Elbertcounty-Co_doc_d22274d25c - Public Records Archive

Full Text

LAND • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County, Colorado prepared for Elbert County Department of Public Works 215 Comanche Street Kiowa, CO 80117 prepared by Enertia Consulting Group, LLC 1529 Market St. Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202 December 2017 ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Report Intent and Objective 1 1.2 Report Content 1 2.0 PAVEMENT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 PAVERTM7 3 3.0 PCI ASSESSMENT 4 3.1 County Road PCI Results 4 3.2 Subdivision Road PCI Results 5 4.0 2017 PCI RESULTS 6 4.1 County Roads 6 4.2 Subdivision Roads 7 5.0 ROAD MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES 8 6.0 ROAD MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 10 6.1 County Road Recommendations 10 6.2 Subdivision Road Recommendations 11 6.3 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Plan Recommendations 12 Appendix A – D6433-09, Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Survey Appendix B – 2010 and 2017 PCI Maps Appendix C – 2017 PCI Results – County Roads Appendix D – 2017 PCI Results – Subdivision Roads ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This 2017 Pavement Assessment Report (hereinafter referred to as “Report”) is prepared for the Elbert County Department of Public Works (DPW), for road maintenance and capital improvement planning purposes. As such, this Report includes an assessment of all paved county roads and residential subdivision roads; and a recommended maintenance and/or improvement strategy based on the assessment. The 2017 pavement assessment described in this Report also serves as a follow up to a similar report prepared for the DPW in 2010. Information from the 2010 report is included for comparison purposes and to assist DPW with its decision-making process regarding short-term and long-term road maintenance and improvement planning. All road surface evaluations completed for this Report were performed based on applicable American Society for Testing of Materials (ASTM) standards. No geotechnical or structural capacity tests were performed. 1.1 Report Intent and Objective The intent of this Report is to evaluate the physical condition of roughly 165 miles of paved road surface within Elbert County and help determine how best to protect and maintain this County infrastructure investment. The objective of the Report is to classify each road according to its condition to help assist the DPW in determining the hierarchy of maintenance and repair from most critical to least critical. Maintenance and improvement strategies are recommended based on the overall physical condition of each road, or segments of roads. In addition to the pavement assessment methodology and findings, this Report also includes pavement repair/replacement cost estimates which may be used as a basis for short-term and long-term decision making regarding roadway maintenance and improvement. 1.2 Report Content This Report includes: a description of the 2017 pavement assessment methodology and the computer software used to compute the pavement condition index for each county road and subdivision; a comparison of 2010 and 2017 pavement condition index results; 2017 results for each county road and subdivision; a recommended 5-year road maintenance plan based on the 2017 results; and cost estimates for the 5-year maintenance plan. Report appendices include: the ASTM standard used to complete the road assessment (Appendix maps summarizing the 2010 and 2017 road assessment results (Appendix 2017 county road assessment results (Appendix and subdivision road assessment results (Appendix ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 2 2.0 PAVEMENT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The ASTM standard used to assess Elbert County paved roads is identified as D6433-09, Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Survey. The pavement condition index (PCI) is a subjective method of evaluation that measures two conditions: the type, extent and severity of pavement surface distresses (typically cracks and rutting); and the smoothness and ride comfort of the road. The PCI is based on visual road surface inspection and observation that rates the condition of pavement and provides a numerical rating system where 0 is the worst possible pavement condition and 100 is the best. A description of the PCI rating system and a description of typical associated pavement conditions is summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1 – PCI Summary PCI Range Classification Approx. Life Pavement Description 86 - 100 Good 25-20 years New pavement. Minimal weathering and minor cracks. Minimal, routine maintenance suggested. 71 - 85 Satisfactory 20-15 years Minor distresses beginning to develop. Low weathering. Routine maintenance required. 55 - 70 Fair 15-12 years Intermediate distresses. Low-medium weathering. Intermediate rehab required. 41 - 56 Poor 12-10 years Intermediate distresses. Medium weathering. Ride quality affected. Intermediate rehab required. 26 - 40 Very Poor 10-7 years Advanced distresses. Medium-high weathering. Ride quality affected. Advanced rehab required. Full Reconstruction possible. 11 - 25 Serious 7-5 years Advanced distresses. High weathering. Ride quality severely affected. Requires full reconstruction. 0 - 10 Failed 5-0 years Extreme distresses and rough pavement. Requires full reconstruction or conversion to gravel road. The road assessment is based on a visual inspection of various pavement distress types requiring a significant amount of field data used to calculate a numerical PCI value, which rates the surface condition of the pavement. Each individual distress type has a specific measurement procedure and criteria for determining the severity level, which is further described in Appendix A. Each distress type is measured and categorized into a severity level of either low, medium or high. The ASTM D6433-09 quantifies the following 19 distress types for asphalt-paved roads. 1. Alligator Cracking – Due to traffic loading, form smaller cracks with sharp angles. Measured by area (ft2). 2. Bleeding – Sticky, bituminous glass like film, excessive amount of asphalt/tar on the surface. 3. Block Cracking – Interconnected cracks divide pavement into rectangular pieces, caused by shrinkage, daily temperature cycling. Not load associated. Typically larger areas. Measured by area (ft2) 4. Bumps & Sags – upward & downward displacements. Buckling or bulging of pavement. Frost Heave. Not considered swelling, shoves, or corrugation. Measured in linear feet. 5. Corrugation – Wash-boarding, series of ripples at regular intervals. Ridges are perpendicular to traffic direction. Measured by area (ft2). Use straight edge. 6. Depression – localized depressions in pavement caused by foundation settlement. Areas with ponding water, look for water stains. Measured by Area (ft2). 7. Edge Cracking – Cracks parallel to and within 1.5 ft of the edge. Due to traffic load and frost-weaken base or subgrade. Measured in linear feet (ft). 8. Lane Shoulder Drop Off – Difference in elevation between shoulder edge and pavement. Caused by shoulder erosion & settlement. Measure in linear feet (ft). ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 3 9. Longitudinal & Transverse Cracking – Parallel to centerline. Caused by poorly constructed lane joint, temperature shrinkage. Cracks are perpendicular to centerline. Measured in linear feet (ft). 10. Patching & Utility Cut – Area that has been replaced with new material. Considered defect no matter how well its performing. Distresses found within a patch are not recorded, however should be taken into account in determining the patch severity level. Measured by Area (ft2) and ride quality. 11. Polished Aggregate – Repeated traffic applications. No rough, angular aggregate to provide skid resistance. Smooth to the touch. Small aggregate at the surface. Measured by Area (ft2). 12. Potholes – Bowl shaped depressions. Potholes can be created by high-severity alligator cracking. Measured by counting the number that are low, medium, high and recorded separately. Severity based on depth and diameter when diameter is greater than 30”. Record size and depth of all potholes. 13. Railroad Crossing – Bumps around or between tracks. Measured by area (ft2). 14. Rutting – Surface depression in wheel path, uplift may occur along sides of rut. Measured by area (ft2). 15. Shoving – Where asphalt pavements abut PCC pavement. PCC pavement increases in length causes push of asphalt. Measured by area (ft2). 16. Slippage Cracking – Crescent or half-moon shaped cracks, usually transverse to travel. Produced by braking or turning wheels. Pavement slides or deforms. Occurs in overlaps, when there is a poor bond between pavement layers. Measured by area (ft2). 17. Swell – upward bulge in pavement, a long, gradual wave more than 10 feet long. Measured by Area (ft2). 18. Raveling – dislodging of coarse aggregate. Insufficient binder, poor mix quality, insufficient compaction, stripping. Measured by area (ft2). 19. Weathering (Surface Wear) – The wearing a way of asphalt binder and fine aggregate matrix. Dislodging of aggregate is covered in Raveling. Surface Wear is caused by oxidation, inadequate compaction, insufficient asphalt content, excessive natural sand, surface water erosion, and traffic. Weathering occurs faster in areas with high solar radiation. Measured by area (ft2). For the 2010 pavement condition assessment, PCI scores were calculated manually in accordance with methodology outlined in ASTM D6433-09. For the 2017 assessment, Elbert County DPW upgraded its pavement assessment procedure by implementing the use of PAVERTM7 computer software. The software was purchased from Colorado State University, an authorized administrator of PAVERTM7. A brief description of PAVERTM7 follows. 2.1 PAVERTM7 The PCI method of quantifying pavement conditions was developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. PAVERTM7 software is one of several applications that compute the PCI score based on data that is input for each road. To satisfy the PAVERTM7 data input requirements, the roads in Elbert County were divided into branches, sections and samples. Each paved road in Elbert County is considered a “branch”. Each branch is then divided into “sections”. County road branches were divided into sections that are approximately one mile in length. Subdivision branches were divided into sections that spanned from one intersection to another intersection or dead end. A “sample” is a 100-foot length of pavement which is visually inspected for the 19 types of pavement distress/deterioration. Multiple samples are taken within each section to determine a PCI score for the section. The PCI scores of the sections are used to determine an overall PCI score for the branch. Appendix C and D include PCI results for county roads and residential subdivision roads, respectively. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 4 3.0 PCI ASSESSMENT The first Elbert County PCI assessment was conducted in summer 2010 and at that time, there were approximately 150 miles of paved roads (88 miles of county roads and 62 miles of residential subdivision roads) included in the assessment. Figure 1 (Appendix B) illustrates the results of the 2010 assessment. The second PCI assessment was conducted in summer 2017. This assessment included 168 miles of paved roads, which included in all roads in the 2010 assessment and an additional 16 miles of county roads and 2 miles of residential subdivision roads constructed between 2010 and 2017. Figure 2 (Appendix B) illustrates the results of the 2017 assessment. A comparison of the 2010 and 2017 results is presented below. 3.1 County Road PCI Results There are currently 25 paved county roads in Elbert County totaling 104 miles. Based on the 2010 pavement condition assessment, the associated PCI scores ranged between 82 (CR 5 – North) and 0 (CR 124) with an average PCI score of 55. Based on this analysis, the DPW initiated a road maintenance and improvement program that included: crack sealing and shouldering (all roads); chip sealing (segments of CR 1, CR 13, CR 21, CR 29, CR 166, CR 186, Elbert Road and Kiowa-Bennett Road); subgrade restoration and patching (all roads); and full restoration (CR 9- 15). In addition, several gravel road segments were paved (4 miles of Kiowa-Bennett Road, 4 miles of CR 194, 2 miles of CR 45, 4 miles of CR 29, and 2 miles of CR 17-21) between 2010 and 2017. As a result of this maintenance and improvement program, the PCI score for all county roads increased with scores ranging between 95 (CR 9-15) and 57 (CR 186) with an average PCI score of 79. Table 2 summarizes the 2010 and 2017 PCI scores and ranking. Table 2 – PCI Summary for County Roads County Road ID 2010 PCI 2010 Classification Rank 2017 PCI 2017 Classification Rank CR 1 – Delbert Rd 41 Poor 19 81 Satisfactory 12 CR 5 (North) 82 Satisfactory 1 87 Good 6 CR 5 (South) 50 Poor 14 71 Satisfactory 21 CR 9-15 41 Poor 19 94 Good 1 CR 13 33 Very Poor 22 68 Fair 23 CR 17-21 60 Fair 9 70 Fair 22 CR 21 58 Fair 11 88 Good 5 CR 29 60 Fair 9 86 Good 8 CR 33 71 Satisfactory 6 81 Satisfactory 12 CR 45 63 Fair 8 83 Satisfactory 9 CR 106 N/A 87 Good 6 CR 124 0 Failed 24 58 Fair 24 CR 125 49 Poor 15 74 Satisfactory 17 CR 132 38 Very Poor 21 93 Good 2 CR 142 53 Poor 13 75 Satisfactory 16 CR 146 49 Poor 15 73 Satisfactory 18 CR 150 81 Satisfactory 2 78 Satisfactory 15 CR 154 81 Satisfactory 2 90 Good 3 CR 158 70 Fair 7 83 Satisfactory 9 CR 166 47 Poor 18 73 Satisfactory 18 CR 174 74 Satisfactory 5 72 Satisfactory 20 CR 186 49 Poor 15 57 Fair 25 CR 194 28 Very Poor 23 89 Good 4 Elbert Road 56 Fair 57 82 Satisfactory 11 Kiowa-Bennett Road 81 Satisfactory 2 81 Satisfactory 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 5 3.2 Subdivision Road PCI Results There are 17 residential subdivision in Elbert County with a total of 64 miles of paved roads. Based on the 2010 pavement condition assessment, the subdivision PCI scores ranged between 95 (Fox Wood Ranches) and 48 (Stage Run) with an average PCI score of 76. Given the higher PCI scores compared to county road PCI scores, the subdivision road maintenance plan was not changed. Subdivision roads continued to be maintained by regular crack sealing and shouldering and addressing structural issues such as potholes, on an as-needed basis, by subgrade restoration with patching. As a result, the average PCI score for subdivision roads remained about the same (average PCI score of 78). Table 3 summarizes the 2010 and 2017 PCI scores and ranking. Table 3 – PCI Summary for Subdivision Roads Subdivision ID 2010 PCI 2010 Classification Rank 2017 PCI 2017 Classification Rank Amanda Pines 78 Satisfactory 90 80 Satisfactory 10 Britanie Ridge 91 Good 3 83 Satisfactory 6 Coyote Hills 82 Satisfactory 7 77 Satisfactory 11 Cimarron 49 Poor 16 67 Fair 15 Deer Creek Estates 81 Satisfactory 8 83 Satisfactory 6 Deer Creek Farms 68 Fair 13 62 Fair 16 Elk Horn Ranch 88 Good 5 82 Satisfactory 8 Fox Wood Ranches 95 Good 1 86 Good 4 Meadow Station 93 Good 2 85 Good 5 Overland 73 Fair 12 89 Good 1 Outback Estates 58 Fair 15 71 Satisfactory 14 Southern Hills 68 Fair 13 89 Good 1 Sky Rim 78 Satisfactory 9 77 Satisfactory 11 Stage Run 48 Poor 17 47 Poor 17 Spring Valley 86 Good 6 87 Good 3 TNM Ranches 74 Satisfactory 11 72 Satisfactory 13 Wild Pointe 91 Good 3 82 Good 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 6 4.0 2017 PCI RESULTS Appendix C and D include the 2017 pavement condition assessment results for each county road and residential subdivision road. A summary of the results are included below for county roads and subdivision roads. 4.1 County Roads 2017 county road PCI scores ranged from 94 (CR 9-15) to 57 (CR 186). Table 4 illustrates the aggregate PCI score, rank, and section classification for each road. Of the 104 sections (or miles) of road that were assessed, 43 sections are classified as good (PCI score between 86-100), 41 sections are classified as satisfactory (PCI score between 71-85), 16 sections are classified as fair (PCI score between 56-70) and 4 sections are classified as poor (PCI score between 41-55). There were no county road sections classified as very poor (PCI scores between 26-40), Serious (PCI score between 11-25) or failed (PCI score between 0-10). Table 4 – 2017 PCI Classification for County Roads COUNTY ROAD INFORMATION NUMBER OF ROAD SECTIONS OF EACH PCI CLASSIFICATION Road PCI Rank Length (ft) Number of Sections Good (86-100) Satisfactory (71-85) Fair (56-70) Poor (41-55) Very Poor (26-40) Serious (11-25) Failed (0-10) CR 1 - Delbert 81 12 26,533 5 5 CR 5 (North) 87 6 5,730 2 2 CR 5 (South) 71 21 4,100 1 1 CR 9- 15 94 1 8,445 2 2 CR 13 68 23 41,875 8 3 4 1 CR 17- 21 70 22 47,950 8 2 1 5 CR 21 88 5 36,638 7 4 3 CR 29 86 8 38,609 6 4 2 CR 33 81 12 1,280 1 1 CR 45 83 9 20,200 4 2 2 CR 106 87 6 10,569 2 2 CR 124 58 24 4,140 1 1 CR 125 74 17 5,280 1 1 CR 132 93 2 8,575 2 2 CR 142 75 16 3,050 1 1 CR 146 73 18 5,100 1 1 CR 150 78 15 10,158 2 2 CR 154 90 3 4,860 1 1 CR 158 83 9 15,740 3 2 1 CR 166 73 18 36,540 6 1 2 2 1 CR 174 72 20 940 1 1 CR 186 57 25 21,943 4 1 1 2 CR 194 89 4 22,086 5 5 Elbert Road 82 11 84,864 14 8 5 1 Kiowa- Bennett 81 12 85,064 16 4 8 1 Totals 550,269 104 43 41 16 4 0 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 7 4.2 Subdivision Roads 2017 subdivision road PCI scores ranged from 89 (Overland and Southern Hills) to 47 (Stage Run). Table 5 illustrates the aggregate PCI score, rank, and segment classification for each subdivision. Of the 276 road sections (varying in length) that were assessed, 70 sections are classified as good (PCI score between 86-100), 142 sections are classified as satisfactory (PCI score between 71-85), 37 sections are classified as fair (PCI score between 56-70), 17 sections are classified as poor (PCI score between 41-55), and 10 sections are classified as very poor. There were no subdivision road sections classified as Serious (PCI score between 11-25) or failed (PCI score between 0-10). Table 5 – 2017 PCI Classification for Subdivision Roads SUBDIVISION ROAD INFORMATION NUMBER OF ROAD SECTIONS OF EACH PCI CLASSIFICATION Subdivision PCI Rank Length (ft) Number of Sections Good (86-100) Satisfactory (71-85) Fair (56- 70) Poor (41-55) Very Poor (26-40) Serious (11-25) Failed (0-10) Amanda Pines 80 10 21,010 20 4 14 2 Britanie Ridge 83 6 18,860 17 7 10 Coyote Hills 77 11 7,165 3 3 Cimarron 67 15 8,740 8 3 3 2 Deer Creek Estates 83 6 11,115 8 5 2 1 Deer Creek Farms 62 16 25,909 41 2 13 14 8 4 Elkhorn Ranch 82 8 64,850 31 3 28 Foxwood Ranches 86 4 12,755 3 1 2 Meadow Station 85 5 23,090 10 4 6 Overland 89 1 8,305 8 6 2 Outback Estates 71 14 5,255 6 1 5 Southern Hills 89 1 1,325 1 1 Sky Rim 77 11 19,005 14 10 3 1 Stage Run 47 17 20,760 17 1 4 6 6 Spring Valley 87 3 38,645 47 24 23 TNM Ranches 72 13 2,830 1 1 Wild Pointe 82 8 45,630 41 12 24 5 Totals 335,249 276 70 142 37 17 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 8 5.0 ROAD MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES The DPW has an on-going road maintenance program that includes: crack sealing; shouldering, subgrade repair and patching; and chip sealing. On a more limited basis, roads are improved by transitioning from gravel and/or chip seal surface to full depth asphalt-paved surface or composite section. A description of each maintenance or improvement technique and estimated unit cost is as follows. Crack Seal Pavement cracking in an inevitable occurrence over the lifetime of any paved road. Crack sealing is a routine technique used to temporary treat roadways cracks. It is also a necessary step prior to more advanced rehabilitation techniques. Crack sealing prevents moisture from infiltrating the pavement crack and causing more extensive problems such as potholes and road subgrade failure. Crack sealing is achieved by applying a flexible rubberized asphalt that prevents water infiltration and moves with the pavement as the crack expands and contracts. The approximate cost of crack sealing depends on the width, depth and number of cracks requiring treatment. Crack sealing cost is estimated to vary from $0.5 to $6 per linear foot of road. Shouldering Shouldering is the process of installing an aggregate material recycled asphaly, gravel) at the edge of pavement at the shoulder when there is a vertical drop-off. This process increases the safety of driving conditions by providing a consistent transition from the paved road surface to the outside limit of travel lanes. The process is done only in areas where there is a noticeable drop-off and is typically completed concurrently with crack sealing. Shouldering cost is estimated to vary from $1 to $2 per linear foot of road. Chip Seal Chip seal is a maintenance technique that extends the life of a typical county road pavement surface for approximately 5 years. Prior to chip sealing a road segment, required crack sealing and subgrade restoration and patching are completed. The road segment is then swept prior to the application of an asphalt-based emulsion. Crushed granite (3/8” chips) is then applied and rolled over the asphalt-based emulsion. A fog sealant is then sprayed uniformly over the top of the chips. Excess chips are swept away prior to the final step of road striping. Chip seal cost is estimated to vary from $2.75 to $3.25 per square yard of road surface. Slurry Seal Slurry seal is a maintenance technique for road experiencing less traffic volume (such as a subdivision road) that extend the life of road surfaces for approximately 5 years. It is a mixture of asphalt emulsion and finer-grained aggregate. Prior to slurry sealing a road segment, required crack sealing and subgrade restoration and patching are completed. Slurry seal is then applied by a truck with a squeegee or spray applicator. Slurry seal cost is estimated to vary from $2.15 to $2.50 per square yard of road surface. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 9 Asphalt Rejuvenator Asphalt Rejuvenator is the application of petroleum-based products AsPenTM, Anova) to penetrate the pavement surface and replace the binders that have been lost over time due to oxidation, weathering, etc.. It is an ideal treatment for pavement with medium to high weathering. Crack sealant is applied to pavement cracks prior to the asphalt rejuvenator application. Asphalt Rejuvenator cost is estimated to vary from $1.25 to $1.75 per square yard of road surface. Mill & Overlay Milling is the process of removing and recycling of the top layer (typically of asphalt. Overlay is the application of a new layer of asphalt pavement over existing or milled asphalt pavement. When the existing asphalt pavement has enough depth, a road in very poor condition can be rehabilitated with milling and overlay. In some cases, the existing asphalt does not have enough depth to be milled. In this case, the existing asphalt is crack sealed and an overlay is applied. Mill and overlay cost is estimated to vary from $25 to $40 per square yard of roadway surface. Full Reconstruction In Elbert County, transitioning a gravel, chip sealed or asphalt-paved surface with a serious or failed PCI score may be considered for full reconstruction. Full reconstruction of county roads typically includes chemically treating subgrade soils with Portland cement or lime and installing 4”-5” of asphalt over the treated subgrade. Full reconstruction of subdivision roads has not been performed in Elbert County to date but would be similar to county road reconstruction if completed. In addition to road improvements, drainage improvements are also included in full reconstruction projects. Full reconstruction cost is estimated to vary from $45 to $70 per square yard of roadway surface. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 10 6.0 ROAD MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Several factors are considered when determining what maintenance and improvement procedure should be applied to existing pavement. These factors include pavement type, PCI score, age, depth, weathering, subgrade conditions, and previously completed maintenance or improvement applications. Table 6 summarizes maintenance/improvement procedures that may be considered based upon PCI score and other factors listed above. Table 6 – Typical Maintenance and Improvement Procedure PCI RANGE PCI CLASSIFICATION RECOMMENDED MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT 86 - 100 GOOD Crack Seal, Shouldering 71 - 85 SATISFACTORY Crack Seal, Shouldering, Asphalt Rejuvenator 55 - 70 FAIR Crack Seal, Shouldering, Asphalt Rejuvenator, Slurry Seal, Chip Seal 41 - 56 POOR Crack Seal, Shouldering, Asphalt Patch, Chip Seal, Mill & Overlay 26 - 40 VERY POOR Crack Seal, Shouldering, Asphalt Patch, Chip Seal, Mill & Overlay, Full Reconstruction 11 - 25 SERIOUS Full Reconstruction, Convert to Gravel 0 - 10 FAILED Full Reconstruction, Convert to Gravel 6.1 County Road Recommendations Based on the 2017 pavement assessment results, approximately 80 percent of county roads achieved a PCI classification of Good (38.6 percent) or Satisfactory (40.9 percent). Approximately 20 percent of county roads achieved a PCI classification of Fair (16.2 percent) or Poor (4.3 Percent). Table 7 summarizes the PCI score and road length and percentage associated with each PCI classification. Table 7 - County Road PCI Score Summary PCI Range PCI Classification Length (ft) Percent Coverage 86 - 100 GOOD 210,306 38.6% 71 - 85 SATISFACTORY 222,954 40.9% 55 - 70 FAIR 88,516 16.2% 41 - 56 POOR 23,211 4.3% 26 - 40 VERY POOR 0 0% 11 - 25 SERIOUS 0 0% 0 - 10 FAILED 0 0% 0.00 50,000.00 100,000.00 150,000.00 200,000.00 250,000.00 Roadway Length (ft) PCI Score County Road PCI Distribution ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 11 Based on the county road pavement assessment, it’s recommended that the DPW continue its crack sealing and shouldering program on all roads. It’s further recommended that county roads with segments that achieved a PCI classification of Fair (CR 13, CR 17-21, CR 124, CR 158, CR 166, CR 186, Elbert Road and Kiowa-Bennett Road) be further inspected to determine if additional road maintenance procedures such as a chip seal or asphalt rejuvenator application are warranted. County roads with segments that achieved a PCI classification of Poor (CR 13, CR 166, CR 186) should be considered as part of the 2018 or 2019 DPW capital improvement plan for county roads. Maps of each county road that identify PCI scores for each road section (mile segments) are included in Appendix C. Using the CR 186 map as an example, there are 3 PCI classifications for the approximately 4 miles of CR 186 included in the pavement assessment. Approximately 1 mile is classified as Fair (Delbert Road to Bristle Cone Court), approximately 2 miles are classified as Poor (Bristle Cone Court to Elkhorn Street), and approximately 1 mile is classified as satisfactory. Should the DPW plan improvement activities along CR 186, the 2 miles with a PCI classification of Poor should be considered a priority. 6.2 Subdivision Road Recommendations Based on the 2017 pavement assessment results, approximately 82 percent of subdivision roads achieved a PCI classification of Good (23.8 percent) or Satisfactory (57.9 percent). Approximately 18 percent of county roads achieved a PCI classification of Fair (11 percent), Poor (5.3 Percent) or Very Poor (2 percent). Table 8 summarizes the PCI score and road length and percentage associated with each PCI classification. Table 8 – Subdivision Road PCI Score Summary PCI Range PCI Classification Length (ft) Percent Coverage 86 - 100 GOOD 75,220 23.8% 71 - 85 SATISFACTORY 182,919 57.9% 55 - 70 FAIR 34,665 11.0% 41 - 56 POOR 16,610 5.3% 26 - 40 VERY POOR 6,690 2.0% 11 - 25 SERIOUS 0 0% 0 - 10 FAILED 0 0% 0.00 40,000.00 80,000.00 120,000.00 160,000.00 200,000.00 Roadway Length (ft) PCI Score Subdivision PCI Distribution ---PAGE BREAK--- 2017 Pavement Assessment Report Elbert County Department of Public Works 12 Based on the subdivision road pavement assessment, it’s recommended that the DPW continue its crack sealing and shouldering program on all roads. It’s further recommended that subdivisions with road segments that achieved a PCI classification of Fair (Amanda Pines, Cimarron, Deer Creek Estates, Deer Creek Farms, Outback Estates, Sky Rim, Stage Run and Wild Pointe), be further inspected to determine if additional road maintenance procedures such as a slurry seal or asphalt rejuvenator application are warranted. Subdivision roads with segments that achieved a PCI classification of Poor or Very Poor (Cimarron, Deer Creek Farms, Outback Estates, Sky Rim and Stage Run) should be considered as part of the 2018 or 2019 DPW capital improvement plan for subdivision roads. Maps of each subdivision road identify PCI scores for each road section (segment length varies). These maps are included in Appendix C. As an example, the Outback Estates map illustrates the segments that are classified as: Fair (Sunset Ave from CR 29 to Eagle Nest Cir) and Good (Sunset Ave from Eagle Nest Circle to the end of Sunset Ave). Should the DPW plan maintenance activities along Sunset Ave, a slurry seal from CR 29 to Eagle Nest Circle may be considered. 6.3 Capital Improvement Plan Recommendations Table 9 includes DPW capital improvement plan recommendations for 2018-2019. Table 9 – Recommended 2018-2019 CIP for County Roads and Subdivision Roads Year Road or Subdivision PCI Class. Location Length (ft.) Maintenance/Improvement Estimated Cost 2018 Cimarron Poor Cimarron Tr. between CR 142 and Morgan Tr. 1,290 Crack Seal, Shouldering, Slurry Seal $9,000 2018 Cimarron Poor Cimarron Tr. Between Palomino Tr. And Morgan Tr. 825 Crack Seal, Shouldering, Slurry Seal $6,000 2018 Deer Creek Farms Poor, V. Poor Deer Ridge Cir, Meadowlark Ct, Cir, Apple Field Cir, Golden Field Cir, Pine Meadow Ave., Segments of Deer Creek Dr. 7,455 Crack Seal, Shouldering, Slurry Seal $124,250 2018 Sky Rim Poor Delbert Rd to Frasier Fir 850 Crack Seal, Shouldering $19,000 2018 Stage Run Poor, V. Poor Segments of Cherokee Tr., Wagon Wheel Tr. And Rawhide Cir, Arabian Tr., Broken Arrow Cir., Stagecoach Cir., 12,610 Crack Seal, Shouldering, Patching, Slurry Seal $210,200 2019 CR 13 Poor South of CR 158 5,280 Crack Seal, Shouldering $10,000 2019 CR 166 Poor East of Delbert Rd 5,280 Crack Seal, Shouldering $12,500 2019 CR 186 Poor Bristle Cone Ct to Elkhorn St (2 mi.) 10,560 Crack Seal, Chip Seal $90,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- LAND • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE Appendix A ASTM D6433-09 Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Survey ---PAGE BREAK--- Designation: D6433 – 09 Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys 1 This standard is issued under the ﬁxed designation D6433; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript epsilon indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. 1. Scope 1.1 This practice covers the determination of roads and parking lots pavement condition through visual surveys using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method of quantifying pavement condition. 1.2 The PCI for roads and parking lots was developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2 It is further veriﬁed and adopted by DOD and APWA. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. Speciﬁc precau- tionary statements are given in Section 6. 2 Terminology 1 2.1 Deﬁnitions of Terms Speciﬁc to This Standard: 2.1.1 additional sample—a sample unit inspected in addition to the random sample units to include nonrepresentative sample units in the determination of the pavement condition. This includes very poor or excellent samples that are not typical of the section and sample units, which contain an unusual distress such as a utility cut. If a sample unit containing an unusual distress is chosen at random it should be counted as an additional sample unit and another random sample unit should be chosen. If every sample unit is surveyed, then there are no additional sample units. 1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E17 on Vehicle - Pavement Systems and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E17.42 on Pavement Testing and Evaluation. Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2009. Published December 2009. Originally approved in 1999. Last previous edition approved in 2007 as D6433 – 07. DOI: 10.1520/D6433-09. 2 The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of this standard. 2.1.2 asphalt concrete (AC) surface—aggregate mixture with an asphalt cement binder. This term also refers to surfaces constructed of coal tars and natural tars for purposes of this practice. 2.1.3 pavement branch—a branch is an identiﬁable part of the pavement network that is a single entity and has a distinct function. For example, each roadway or parking area is a separate branch. 2.1.4 pavement condition index (PCI)—a numerical rating of the pavement condition that ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible condition and 100 being the best possible condition. 2.1.5 pavement condition rating—a verbal description of pavement condition as a function of the PCI value that varies from “failed” to “excellent” as shown in Fig. 1. 2.1.6 pavement distress—external indicators of pavement deterioration caused by loading, environmental factors, con- struction deﬁciencies, or a combination thereof. Typical dis- tresses are cracks, rutting, and weathering of the pavement surface. Distress types and severity levels detailed in Appendix X1 for AC, and Appendix X2 for PCC pavements must be used to obtain an accurate PCI value. 2.1.7 pavement sample unit—a subdivision of a pavement section that has a standard size range: 20 contiguous slabs (68 slabs if the total number of slabs in the section is not evenly divided by 20 or to accommodate speciﬁc ﬁeld condition) for PCC pavement, and 2500 contiguous square feet, 6 1000 ft 2 (225 6 90 m if the pavement is not evenly divided by 2500 or to accommodate speciﬁc ﬁeld condition, for AC pavement. 2.1.8 pavement section—a contiguous pavement area having uniform construction, maintenance, usage history, and condition. A section should have the same traffic volume and load intensity. 2.1.9 portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement— aggregate mixture with portland cement binder including nonreinforced and reinforced jointed pavement. 2.1.10 random sample—a sample unit of the pavement section selected for inspection by random sampling techniques, such as a random number table or systematic random procedure. Copyright © ASTM International. 100 Barr Harbor Dr., P.O. box C-700 West Conshohocken, 19428-2959, United States Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3. Summary of Practice 1 The pavement is divided into branches that are divided into sections. Each section is divided into sample units. The type and severity of pavement distress is assessed by visual inspection of the pavement sample units. The quantity of the distress is measured as described in Appendix X1 and Appendix X2. The distress data are used to calculate the PCI for each sample unit. The PCI of the pavement section is determined based on the PCI of the inspected sample units within the section. 4. Summary of Practice 4.1 The PCI is a numerical indicator that rates the surface condition of the pavement. The PCI provides a measure of the present condition of the pavement based on the distress observed on the surface of the pavement, which also indicates the structural integrity and surface operational condition (lo- calized roughness and safety). The PCI cannot measure struc- tural capacity nor does it provide direct measurement of skid resistance or roughness. It provides an objective and rational basis for determining maintenance and repair needs and priorities. Continuous monitoring of the PCI is used to estab- lish the rate of pavement deterioration, which permits early identiﬁcation of major rehabilitation needs. The PCI provides feedback on pavement performance for validation or improve- ment of current pavement design and maintenance procedures. 5. Apparatus 5.1 Data Sheets, or other ﬁeld recording instruments that record at a minimum the following information: date, location, branch, section, sample unit size, slab number and size, distress types, severity levels, quantities, and names of surveyors. Example data sheets for AC and PCC pavements are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. 6.1 Traffic is a hazard as inspectors may walk on the pavement to perform the condition survey. FIG. 2 & 3 Not Applicable 5. Apparatus 5.2 Hand Odometer Wheel, that reads to the nearest 0.1 ft (30 mm). 5.3 Straightedge or String Line, (AC only), 10 ft (3 5.4 Scale, 12 in. (300 mm) that reads to 1⁄8 in. (3 mm) or better. Additional 12-in. (300 mm) ruler or straightedge is needed to measure faulting in PCC pavements. 5.5 Layout Plan, for network to be inspected. 6. Hazards 2 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by 2 D6433 – 09 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 8.2 Asphalt Concrete (AC) Surfaced Pavement— Individually inspect each sample unit chosen. Sketch the sample unit, including orientation. Record the branch and section number and the number and type of the sample unit (random or additional). Record the sample unit size measured with the hand odometer. Conduct the distress inspection by walking over the sidewalk/shoulder of the sample unit being surveyed, measuring the quantity of each severity level of every distress type present, and recording the data. Each distress must correspond in type and severity to that described in Appendix X1. The method of measurement is included with each distress description. Repeat this procedure for each sample unit to be inspected. A copy of a Blank Flexible Pavement Condition Survey Data Sheet for Sample Unit is included in Fig. 2. 8. Inspection Procedure 8.1 The deﬁnitions and guidelines for quantifying distresses for PCI determination are given in Appendix X1 for AC pavements. Using this test method, inspectors should identify distress types accurately 95 % of the time. Linear measure- ments should be considered accurate when they are within 10 % if remeasured, and area measurements should be considered accurate when they are within 20 % if remeasured. Distress severities that one determines based on ride quality are considered subjective. 9. Calculation of PCI for Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavement 9.1 Add up the total quantity of each distress type at each severity level, and record them in the “Total Severities” section. For example, Fig. 4 shows ﬁve entries for the Distress Type 1, “Alligator Cracking”: 5L, 4L, 4L, 8H, and 6H. The distress at each severity level is summed and entered in the “Total Severity” section as 13 ft 2 (1.2 m 2) of low severity and 14 ft 2 (1.3 m 2) of medium severity. The units for the quantities may be either in square feet (square meters), linear feet (meters), or number of occurrences, depending on the distress type. 9.2 Divide the total quantity of each distress type at each severity level from 9.1 by the total area of the sample unit and multiply by 100 to obtain the percent density of each distress type and severity. 9.3 Determine the deduct value (DV) for each distress type and severity level combination from the distress deduct value curves in Appendix X3. 9.4 Determine the maximum corrected deduct value (CDV). The procedure for determining maximum CDV from indi- vidual DVs is identical for both AC and PCC pavement types. 9.5 The following procedure must be used to determine the maximum CDV. 9.5.1 If none or only one individual deduct value is greater than two, the total value is used in place of the maximum CDV in determining the PCI; otherwise, maximum CDV must be determined using the procedure described in 9.5.2-9.5.5. 9.5.2 List the individual deduct values in descending order. For example, in Fig. 4 this will be 25.1, 23.4, 17.9, 11.2, 7.9, 7.5, 6.9, and 5.3. 9.5.3 Determine the allowable number of deducts, m, from Fig. 5, or using the following formula (see Eq m 5 1 1~9/98!~100–HDV! # 10 where: m = allowable number of deducts including fractions (must be less than or equal to ten), and HDV = highest individual deduct value. (For the example in Fig. 4, m = 1 + (9/98)(100-25.1) = 7.9). ---PAGE BREAK--- Figure 4 4 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. 5 Adjustment of Number of Deduct Values 9.5.4 The number of individual deduct values is reduced to the m largest deduct values, including the fractional part. For the example in Fig. 6, the values are 25.1, 23.4, 17.9, 11.2, 7.9, 7.5, 6.9, and 4.8 (the 4.8 is obtained by multiplying 5.3 by (7.9 – 7 = If less than m deduct values are available, all of the deduct values are used. 9.5.5 Determine maximum CDV iteratively, as shown in Fig. 6. 9.5.5.1 Determine total deduct value by summing individual deduct values. The total deduct value is obtained by adding the individual deduct values in 9.5.4, that is, 104.7. 9.5.5.2 Determine q as the number of deducts with a value greater than 2.0. For example, in Fig. 6, q 9.5.5.3 Determine the CDV from total deduct value and q by looking up the appropriate correction curve for AC pavements in Fig. X4.15 in Appendix X3. 9.5.5.4 Reduce the smallest individual deduct value greater than 2.0 to 2.0 and repeat 9.5.5.1-9.5.5.3 until q 9.5.5.5 Maximum CDV is the largest of the CDVs. 9.6 Calculate PCI by subtracting the maximum CDV from 100: PCI = 100-max CDV. 9.7 Fig. 6 shows a summary of PCI calculation for the example AC pavement data in Fig. 4. A blank PCI calculation form is included in Fig. 2. 5 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIXES (Nonmandatory Information) X1. Distress in Asphalt Pavements X1.1 During the ﬁeld condition surveys and validation of the PCI, several questions are commonly asked about the identiﬁcation and measurement of some of the distresses. The answers to these questions for each distress are included under the heading “How to Measure.” For convenience, however, the most frequently raised issues are addressed below: X1.1.1 If alligator cracking and rutting occur in the same area, each is recorded separately at its respective severity level. X1.1.2 If bleeding is counted, polished aggregate is not counted in the same area. X1.1.3 Spalling as used herein is the further breaking of pavement or loss of materials around cracks or joints. X1.1.4 If a crack does not have the same severity level along its entire length, each portion of the crack having a different severity level should be recorded separately. If, however, the different levels of severity in a portion of a crack 6 FIG. 6 Calculation of Corrected PCI Value—Flexible Pavement ---PAGE BREAK--- cannot be easily divided, that portion should be rated at the highest severity level present. X1.1.5 If any distress, including cracking and potholes, is found in a patched area, it is not recorded; its effect on the patch, however, is considered in determining the severity level of the patch. X1.1.6 A signiﬁcant amount of polished aggregate should be present before it is counted. X1.1.7 A distress is said to be raveled if the area surrounding the distress is broken (sometimes to the extent that pieces are removed). X1.2 The reader should note that the items above are general issues and do not stand alone as inspection criteria. To properly measure each distress type, the inspector must be familiar with its individual measurement criteria. X1.3 Nineteen distress types for asphalt-surfaced pavements are listed alphabetically in this manual. RIDE QUALITY X1.4 Ride quality must be evaluated in order to establish a severity level for the following distress types: X1.4.1 Bumps. X1.4.2 Corrugation. X1.4.3 Railroad crossings. X1.4.4 Shoving. X1.4.5 Swells. X1.4.6 To determine the effect these distresses have on ride quality, the inspector should drive at the normal operating speed and use the following severity-level deﬁnitions of ride quality: X1.4.6.1 L—Low. Vehicle vibrations, for example, from corrugation, are noticeable, but no reduction in speed is necessary for comfort or safety. Individual bumps or settlements, or both, cause the vehicle to bounce but create little discomfort. X1.4.6.2 M—Medium. Vehicle vibrations are signiﬁcant and some reduction in speed is necessary for safety and comfort. Individual bumps or settlements, or both, cause the vehicle to bounce signiﬁcantly, creating some discomfort. X1.4.6.3 H—High. Vehicle vibrations are so excessive that speed must be reduced considerably for safety and comfort. Individual bumps or settlements, or both, cause the vehicle to bounce excessively, creating substantial discomfort, safety hazard, or high potential vehicle damage. X1.4.7 The inspector should drive at the posted speed in a sedan that is representative of cars typically seen in local traffic. Pavement sections near stop signs should be rated at a deceleration speed appropriate for the intersection. ALLIGATOR CRACKING (FATIGUE) X1.5 Description—Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic loading. Cracking begins at the bottom of the asphalt surface, or stabilized base, where tensile stress and strain are highest under a wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface initially as a series of parallel longitudinal cracks. After repeated traffic loading, the cracks connect, forming many sided, sharp-angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling chicken wire or the skin of an alligator. The pieces are generally less than 0.5 m (1.5 ft) on the longest side. Alligator cracking occurs only in areas subjected to repeated traffic loading, such as wheel paths. Pattern-type cracking that occurs over an entire area not subjected to loading is called “block cracking,” which is not a load-associated distress. X1.5.1 Severity Levels: X1.5.1.1 L—Fine, longitudinal hairline cracks running par- allel to each other with no, or only a few interconnecting cracks. The cracks are not spalled (Fig. X1.1). X1.5.1.2 M—Further development of light alligator cracks into a pattern or network of cracks that may be spalled (Fig. X1.2). X1.5.1.3 H—Network or pattern cracking has progressed so that the pieces are well deﬁned and spalled at the edges. Some of the pieces may rock under traffic (Fig. X1.3). X1.5.2 How to Measure—Alligator cracking is measured in square meters (square feet) of surface area. The major difficulty in measuring this type of distress is that two or three levels of severity often exist within one distressed area. If these portions can be easily distinguished from each other, they should be measured and recorded separately; however, if the different levels of severity cannot be divided easily, the entire area should be rated at the highest severity present. If alligator cracking and rutting occur in the same area, each is recorded separately as its respective severity level. BLEEDING X1.6 Description—Bleeding is a ﬁlm of bituminous material on the pavement surface that creates a shiny, glasslike, reﬂecting surface that usually becomes quite sticky. Bleeding is caused by excessive amounts of asphaltic cement or tars in the mix, excess application of a bituminous sealant, or low air void content, or a combination thereof. It occurs when asphalt ﬁlls the voids of the mix during hot weather and then expands onto the pavement surface. Since the bleeding process in not reversible during cold weather, asphalt or tar will accumulate on the surface. FIG. X1.1 Low-Severity Alligator Cracking 7 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.2 Medium-Severity Alligator Cracking FIG. X1.5 Medium-Severity Bleeding FIG. X1.3 High-Severity Alligator Cracking X1.6.1 Severity Levels: X1.6.1.1 L—Bleeding only has occurred to a very slight degree and is noticeable only during a few days of the year. Asphalt does not stick to shoes or vehicles (Fig. X1.4). X1.6.1.2 M—Bleeding has occurred to the extent that asphalt sticks to shoes and vehicles during only a few weeks of the year (Fig. X1.5). FIG. X1.4 Low-Severity Bleeding Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by X1.6.1.3 H—Bleeding has occurred extensively and consid- erable asphalt sticks to shoes and vehicles during at least several weeks of the year (Fig. X1.6). X1.6.2 How to Measure—Bleeding is measured in square meters (square feet) of surface area. If bleeding is counted, polished aggregate should not be counted. BLOCK CRACKING X1.7 Description—Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement into approximately rectangular pieces. The blocks may range in size from approximately 0.3 by 0.3 m (1 by 1 ft) to 3 by 3 m (10 by 10 ft). Block cracking is caused mainly by shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily temperature cycling, which results in daily stress/strain cycling. It is not load-associated. Block cracking usually indi- cates that the asphalt has hardened signiﬁcantly. Block crack- ing normally occurs over a large portion of the pavement area, FIG. X1.6 High-Severity Bleeding 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- but sometimes will occur only in nontraffic areas. This type of distress differs from alligator cracking in that alligator cracks form smaller, many-sided pieces with sharp angles. Also, unlike block, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings, and therefore, are found only in traffic areas, that is, wheel paths. X1.7.1 Severity Levels: X1.7.1.1 L—Blocks are deﬁned by low-severity 3 cracks (Fig. X1.7). X1.7.1.2 M—Blocks are deﬁned by medium-severity 3 cracks (Fig. X1.8). X1.7.1.3 H—Blocks are deﬁned by high-severity 3 cracks (Fig. X1.9). X1.7.2 How to Measure—Block cracking is measured in m 2 (ft 2) of surface area. It usually occurs at one severity level in a given pavement section; however, if areas of different severity levels can be distinguished easily from one another, they should be measured and recorded separately. BUMPS AND SAGS X1.8 Description: X1.8.1 Bumps are small, localized, upward displacements of the pavement surface. They are different from shoves in that shoves are caused by unstable pavement. Bumps, on the other hand, can be caused by several factors, including: X1.8.1.1 Buckling or bulging of underlying PCC slabs in AC overlay over PCC pavement. X1.8.1.2 Frost heave (ice, lens growth). X1.8.1.3 Inﬁltration and buildup of material in a crack in combination with traffic loading (sometimes called “tenting”). X1.8.1.4 Sags are small, abrupt, downward displacements of the pavement surface. If bumps appear in a pattern perpen- dicular to traffic ﬂow and are spaced at less than 3 m (10 ft), the distress is called corrugation. Distortion and displacement that occur over large areas of the pavement surface, causing large or long dips, or both, in the pavement should be recorded as“ swelling.” X1.8.2 Severity Levels: 3 See deﬁnitions of longitudinal transverse cracking within Appendix X2.10. FIG. X1.8 Medium-Severity Block Cracking FIG. X1.9 High-Severity Block Cracking X1.8.2.1 L—Bump or sag causes low-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.10). X1.8.2.2 M—Bump or sag causes medium-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.11). X1.8.2.3 H—Bump or sag causes high-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.12). FIG. X1.7 Low-Severity Block Cracking FIG. X1.10 Low-Severity Bumps and Sags 9 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.11 Medium-Severity Bumps and Sags FIG. X1.13 Low-Severity Corrugation FIG. X1.12 High-Severity Bumps and Sags FIG. X1.14 Medium-Severity Corrugation X1.8.3 How to Measure—Bumps or sags are measured in linear meters (feet). If the bump occurs in combination with a crack, the crack also is recorded. CORRUGATION X1.9 Description—Corrugation, also known as “wash- boarding”, is a series of closely spaced ridges and valleys (ripples) occurring at fairly regular intervals, usually less than 3 m (10 ft) along the pavement. The ridges are perpendicular to the traffic direction. This type of distress usually is caused by traffic action combined with an unstable pavement surface or base. X1.9.1 Severity Levels: X1.9.1.1 L—Corrugation produces low-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.13). X1.9.1.2 M—Corrugation produces medium-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.14). X1.9.1.3 H—Corrugation produces high-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.15). X1.9.2 How to Measure—Corrugation is measured in square meters (square feet) of surface area. DEPRESSION X1.10 Description—Depressions are localized pavement FIG. X1.15 High-Severity Corrugation surface areas with elevations lower than those of the surrounding pavement. In many instances, light depressions are not noticeable until after a rain, when ponding water creates a “birdbath” area; on dry pavement, depressions can be spotted by looking for stains caused by ponding water. Depressions are created by settlement of the foundation soil or are a result of 10 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- improper construction. Depressions cause some roughness, and when deep enough or ﬁlled with water, can cause hydroplaning. X1.10.1 Severity Levels (Maximum Depth of Depression): X1.10.1.1 L–13 to 25 mm ( 1⁄2 to 1 in.) (Fig. X1.16). X1.10.1.2 M–25 to 50 mm (1 to 2 in.) (Fig. X1.17). X1.10.1.3 H—More than 50 mm (2 in.) (Fig. X1.18). X1.10.2 How to Measure—Depressions are measured in square meters (square feet) of surface area. EDGE CRACKING X1.11 Description—Edge cracks are parallel to and usually within 0.3 to 0.5 m (1 to 1.5 ft) of the outer edge of the pavement. This distress is accelerated by traffic loading and can be caused by frost-weakened base or subgrade near the edge of the pavement. The area between the crack and pavement edge is classiﬁed as raveled if it is broken up (sometimes to the extent that pieces are removed). X1.11.1 Severity Levels: X1.11.1.1 L—Low or medium cracking with no breakup or raveling (Fig. X1.19). X1.11.1.2 M—Medium cracks with some breakup and rav- eling (Fig. X1.20). X1.11.1.3 H—Considerable breakup or raveling along the edge (Fig. X1.21). X1.11.2 How to Measure—Edge cracking is measure in linear meters (feet). JOINT REFLECTION CRACKING (From Longitudinal and Transverse PCC Slabs) X1.12 Description—This distress occurs only on asphalt- surfaced pavements that have been laid over a PCC slab. It does not include reﬂection cracks from any other type of base, that is, cement-or lime-stabilized; these cracks are caused mainly by thermal-or moisture-induced movement of the PCC slab beneath the AC surface. This distress is not load-related; however, traffic loading may cause a breakdown of the AC surface near the crack. If the pavement is fragmented along a FIG. X1.16 Low-Severity Depression FIG. X1.17 Medium-Severity Depression FIG. X1.18 High-Severity Depression FIG. X1.19 Low-Severity Edge Cracking crack, the crack is said to be spalled. A knowledge of slab dimension beneath the AC surface will help to identify these distresses. X1.12.1 Severity Levels: X1.12.1.1 L—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.22): Nonﬁlled crack width is less than 10 mm ( 3⁄8 in.), or ﬁlled crack of any width (ﬁller in satisfactory condition). 11 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.20 Medium-Severity Edge Cracking FIG. X1.23 Medium-Severity Joint Reﬂection Cracking FIG. X1.21 High-Severity Edge Cracking X1.12.1.3 H—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.24): Any crack ﬁlled or nonﬁlled surrounded by medium- or high-severity secondary cracking; nonﬁlled cracks greater than 75 mm (3 in.); or, a crack of any width where approxi- mately 100 mm (4 in.) of pavement around the crack are severely raveled or broken. X1.12.2 How to Measure—Joint reﬂection cracking is mea- sured in linear meters (feet). The length and severity level of each crack should be identiﬁed and recorded separately. For example, a crack that is 15 m (50 ft) long may have 3 m (10 ft) FIG. X1.22 Low-Severity Joint Reﬂection Cracking FIG. X1.24 High-Severity Joint Reﬂection Cracking X1.12.1.2 M—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.23): Nonﬁlled crack width is greater than or equal to 10 mm ( 3⁄8 in.) and less than 75 mm (3 in.); nonﬁlled crack less than or equal to 75 mm (3 in.) surrounded by light secondary cracking; or, ﬁlled crack of any width surrounded by light secondary cracking. 12 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- of high severity cracks, which are all recorded separately. If a bump occurs at the reﬂection crack, it is recorded also. LANE/SHOULDER DROP-OFF X1.13 Description—Lane/shoulder drop-off is a difference in elevation between the pavement edge and the shoulder. This distress is caused by shoulder erosion, shoulder settlement, or by building up the roadway without adjusting the shoulder level. X1.13.1 Severity Levels: X1.13.1.1 L—The difference in elevation between the pave- ment edge and shoulder is > 25 mm (1 in.) and< 50 mm (2 in.) (Fig. X1.25). X1.13.1.2 M—The difference in elevation is > 50 mm (2 in.) and < 100 mm (4 in.) (Fig. X1.26). X1.13.1.3 H—The difference in elevation is > 100 mm (4 in.) (Fig. X1.27). X1.13.2 How to Measure—Lane/shoulder drop-off is mea- sured in linear meters (feet). LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING (Non-PCC Slab Joint Reﬂective) X1.14 Description: X1.14.1 Longitudinal cracks are parallel to the pavement’s centerline or laydown direction. They may be caused by: X1.14.1.1 A poorly constructed paving lane joint. X1.14.1.2 Shrinkage of the AC surface due to low tempera- tures or hardening of the asphalt, or daily temperature cycling, or both. X1.14.1.3 A reﬂective crack caused by cracking beneath the surface course, including cracks in PCC slabs, but not PCC joints. X1.14.1.4 Transverse cracks extend across the pavement at approximately right angles to the pavement centerline or direction of laydown. These types of cracks are not usually load-associated. X1.14.2 Severity Levels: X1.14.2.1 L—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.28): nonﬁlled crack width is less than 10 mm ( 3⁄8 in.), or ﬁlled crack of any width (ﬁller in satisfactory condition). FIG. X1.25 Low-Severity Lane/Shoulder Drop-Off FIG. X1.26 Medium-Severity Lane/Shoulder Drop-Off FIG. X1.27 High-Severity Lane/Shoulder Drop-Off FIG. X1.28 Low-Severity Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking X1.14.2.2 M—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.29): nonﬁlled crack width is greater than or equal to 10 mm and less than 75 mm ( 3⁄8 to 3 in.); nonﬁlled crack is less than or equal to 75 mm (3 in.) surrounded by light and random cracking; or, ﬁlled crack is of any width surrounded by light random cracking. 13 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.29 Medium-Severity Longitudinal and TransverseCracking FIG. X1.31 Low-Severity Patching and Utility Cut Patching X1.14.2.3 H—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.30): any crack ﬁlled or nonﬁlled surrounded by medium-or high-severity random cracking; nonﬁlled crack greater than 75 m (3 in.); or, a crack of any width where approximately 100 mm (4 in.) of pavement around the crack is severely broken. X1.14.3 How to Measure—Longitudinal and transverse cracks are measured in linear meters (feet). The length and severity of each crack should be recorded. If the crack does not have the same severity level along its entire length, each portion of the crack having a different severity level should be recorded separately. PATCHING AND UTILITY CUT PATCHING X1.15 Description—A patch is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair the existing pave- ment. A patch is considered a defect no matter how well it is performing (a patched area or adjacent area usually does not perform as well as an original pavement section). Generally, some roughness is associated with this distress. X1.15.1 Severity Levels: X1.15.1.1 L—Patch is in good condition and satisfactory. Ride quality is rated as low severity or better (Fig. X1.31). X1.15.1.2 M—Patch is moderately deteriorated, or ride quality is rated as medium severity, or both (Fig. X1.32). X1.15.1.3 H—Patch is badly deteriorated, or ride quality is rated as high severity, or both; needs replacement soon (Fig. X1.33). X1.15.2 How to Measure—Patching is rated in ft 2 of surface area; however, if a single patch has areas of differing severity, these areas should be measured and recorded separately. For example, a 2.5 m 2 (27.0 ft 2) patch may have 1 m 2 (11 ft 2) of medium severity and 1.5 m 2 (16 ft 2) of low severity. These areas would be recorded separately. Any distress found in a patched area will not be recorded; however, its effect on the patch will be considered when determining the patch’s severity level. No other distresses, for example, are recorded within a patch. Even if the patch material is shoving or cracking, the area is rated only as a patch. If a large amount of pavement has been replaced, it should not be recorded as a patch but considered as new pavement, for example, replace- ment of a complete intersection. POLISHED AGGREGATE X1.16 Description—This distress is caused by repeated traffic applications. Polished aggregate is present when close FIG. X1.30 High-Severity Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking FIG. X1.32 Medium-Severity Patching and Utility Cut Patching 14 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.33 High-Severity Patching and Utility Cut Patching examination of a pavement reveals that the portion of aggre- gate extending above the asphalt is either very small, or there are no rough or angular aggregate particles to provide good skid resistance. When the aggregate in the surface becomes smooth to the touch, adhesion with vehicle tires is considerably reduced. When the portion of aggregate extending above the surface is small, the pavement texture does not signiﬁcantly contribute to reducing vehicle speed. Polished aggregate should be counted when close examination reveals that the aggregate extending above the asphalt is negligible, and the surface aggregate is smooth to the touch. This type of distress is indicated when the number on a skid resistance test is low or has dropped signiﬁcantly from a previous rating. X1.16.1 Severity Levels—No degrees of severity are deﬁned; however, the degree of polishing should be clearly evident in the sample unit in that the aggregate surface should be smooth to the touch (Fig. X1.34). X1.16.2 How to Measure—Polished aggregate is measured in square meters (square feet) of surface area. If bleeding is counted, polished aggregate should not be counted. POTHOLES X1.17 Description—Potholes are small—usually less than FIG. X1.34 Polished Aggregate Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by 750 mm (30 in.) in diameter—bowl-shaped depressions in the pavement surface. They generally have sharp edges and vertical sides near the top of the hole. When holes are created by high-severity alligator cracking, they should be identiﬁed as potholes, not as weathering. X1.17.1 Severity Levels: X1.17.1.1 The levels of severity for potholes less than 750 mm (30 in.) in diameter are based on both the diameter and the depth of the pothole, according to Table X1.1. X1.17.1.2 If the pothole is more than 750 mm (30 in.) in diameter, the area should be determined in square feet and divided by 0.5 m 2 (5.5 ft 2) ﬁnd the equivalent number of holes. If the depth is 25 mm (1 in.) or less, the holes are considered medium-severity. If the depth is more than 25 mm (1 in.), they are considered high-severity (Figs. X1.35-X1.37). X1.17.2 How to Measure—Potholes are measured by counting the number that are low-, medium-, and high-severity and recording them separately. RAILROAD CROSSING X1.18 Description—Railroad crossing defects are depres sions or bumps around, or between tracks, or both. X1.18.1 Severity Levels: X1.18.1.1 L—Railroad crossing causes low-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.38). X1.18.1.2 M—Railroad crossing causes medium-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.39). X1.18.1.3 H—Railroad crossing causes high-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.40). X1.18.2 How to Measure—The area of the crossing is measured in square meters (square feet) of surface area. If the crossing does not affect ride quality, it should not be counted. Any large bump created by the tracks should be counted as part of the crossing. RUTTING X1.19 Description—A rut is a surface depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift may occur along the sides of the rut, but, in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after a rainfall when the paths are ﬁlled with water. Rutting stems from a permanent deformation in any of the pavement layers or subgrades, usually caused by consolidated or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic load. X1.19.1 Severity Levels (Mean Rut Depth): X1.19.1.1 L—6 to 13 mm ( 1⁄4 to 1⁄2 in.) (Fig. X1.41). X1.19.1.2 M—>13 to 25 mm 1⁄2 to 1 in.) (Fig. X1.42). 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.35 Low-Severity Pothole FIG. X1.38 Low-Severity Railroad Crossing FIG. X1.36 Medium-Severity Pothole FIG. X1.39 Medium-Severity Railroad Crossing FIG. X1.37 High-Severity Pothole FIG. X1.40 High-Severity Railroad Crossing X1.19.1.3 H—>25 mm in.) (Fig. X1.43). measurements taken along the length of the rut to compute its X1.19.2 How to Measure—Rutting is measured in square mean depth in millimeters. meters (square feet) of surface area, and its severity is determined by the mean depth of the rut (see X1.19.1.1- X1.19.1.3). The mean rut depth is calculated SHOVING by laying a straight edge across the rut, measuring its depth, then using X1.20 Description 16 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.41 Low-Severity Rutting FIG. X1.42 Medium-Severity Rutting FIG. X1.43 High-Severity Rutting X1.20.1 Shoving is a permanent, longitudinal displacement of a localized area of the pavement surface caused by traffic loading. When traffic pushes against the pavement, it produces a short, abrupt wave in the pavement surface. This distress normally occurs only in unstable liquid asphalt mix (cutback or emulsion) pavements. X1.20.2 Shoves also occur where asphalt pavements abut PCC pavements. The PCC pavements increase in length and push the asphalt pavement, causing the shoving. X1.20.3 Severity Levels: X1.20.3.1 L—Shove causes low-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.44). X1.20.3.2 M—Shove causes medium-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.45). X1.20.3.3 H—Shove causes high-severity ride quality (Fig. X1.46). X1.20.4 How to Measure—Shoves are measured in square meters (feet) of surface area. Shoves occurring in patches are considered in rating the patch, not as a separate distress. SLIPPAGE CRACKING X1.21 Description—Slippage cracks are crescent or half- moon shaped cracks, usually transverse to the direction of travel. They are produced when braking or turning wheels cause the pavement surface to slide or deform. This distress usually occurs in overlaps when there is a poor bond between the surface and the next layer of the pavement structure. X1.21.1 Severity Level: X1.21.1.1 L—Average crack width is < 10 mm ( 3⁄8 in.) (Fig. X1.47). X1.21.1.2 M—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.48): average crack width is $ 10 and<40mm($ 3⁄8 and< 1- 1⁄2 in.); or the area around the crack is moderately spalled, or surrounded with secondary cracks. X1.21.1.3 H—One of the following conditions exists (Fig. X1.49): the average crack width is > 40 mm 1⁄2 in.) or the area around the crack is broken into easily removed pieces. X1.21.2 How to Measure—The area associated with a given slippage crack is measured in square meters (square feet) and rated according to the highest level of severity in the area. SWELL X1.22 Description—Swell is characterized by an upward bulge in the pavement’s surface, a long, gradual wave more FIG. X1.44 Low-Severity Shoving 17 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.45 Medium-Severity Shoving FIG. X1.48 Medium-Severity Slippage Cracking FIG. X1.46 High-Severity Shoving FIG. X1.49 High-Severity Slippage Cracking FIG. X1.47 Low-Severity Slippage Cracking FIG. X1.50 Example Swell. Severity level is based on ride quality criteria. than 3 m (10 ft) long (Fig. X1.50). Swelling can be accompa- nied by surface cracking. This distress usually is caused by frost action in the subgrade or by swelling soil. X1.22.1 Severity Level: X1.22.1.1 L—Swell causes low-severity ride quality. Low- severity swells are not always easy to see but can be detected by driving at the speed limit over the pavement section. An upward motion will occur at the swell if it is present. X1.22.1.2 M—Swell causes medium-severity ride quality. X1.22.1.3 H—Swell causes high-severity ride quality. 18 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- X1.22.2 How to Measure—The surface area of the swell is measured in square meters (square feet). RAVELING X1.23 Description—Raveling is the dislodging of coarse aggregate particles. Raveling may be caused by insufficient asphalt binder, poor mixture quality, insufficient compaction, segregation, or stripping. X1.23.1 Dense Mix Severity Levels—As used herein, coarse aggregate refers to predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix, and aggregate clusters refers to when more than one adjoining coarse aggregate piece is missing. If in doubt about a severity level, three representative areas of one square yard each (square meters) should be examined and the number of missing aggregate particles/clusters is counted. X1.23.1.1 M—Considerable loss of coarse aggregate, greater than 20 per square yard (square meter), or clusters of missing coarse aggregate are present (or both) (see Fig. X1.51). X1.23.1.2 H—Surface is very rough and pitted, may be completely removed in places (see Fig. X1.52). X1.23.2 How to Measure—Raveling is measured in square feet (square meters) of surface area. Mechanical damage caused by such things as hook drags, tire rims, or snowplows is counted as raveling. If raveling is present weathering (surface wear) is not recorded. WEATHERING (SURFACE WEAR)—DENSE MIX ASPHALT X1.24 Description—The wearing away of the asphalt binder and ﬁne aggregate matrix. X1.24.1 Severity Levels: As used herein, coarse aggregate refers to predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix. Loss or dislodging of coarse aggregate is covered under Raveling. Surface wear is normally caused by oxidation, inadequate compaction, insuf- ﬁcient asphalt content, excessive natural sand, surface water erosion, and traffic. Weathering occurs faster in areas with high solar radiation. FIG. X1.52 High-Severity Raveling X1.24.1.1 L—Asphalt surface beginning to show signs of aging which may be accelerated by climatic conditions. Loss is the ﬁne aggregate matrix is noticeable and may be accompanied by fading of the asphalt color. Edges of the coarse aggregates are beginning to be exposed (less than 1 mm or 0.05 inches). Pavement may be relatively new (as new as 6 months old) (see Fig. X1.53). X1.24.1.2 M—Loss of ﬁne aggregate matrix is noticeable and edges of coarse aggregate have been exposed up to ¼ width (of the longest side) of the coarse aggregate due to the loss of ﬁne aggregate matrix (see Fig. X1.54). X1.24.1.3 H—Edges of coarse aggregate have been exposed greater than ¼ width (of the longest side) of the coarse aggregate. There is considerable loss of ﬁne aggregate matrix leading to potential or some loss of coarse aggregate (see Fig. X1.55). X1.24.2 How to Measure—Surface wear is measured in square feet (square metre). Surface wear is not recorded where medium or high severity (or both) raveling is recorded. FIG. X1.51 Medium-Severity Raveling FIG. X1.53 Low-Severity Weathering (Sur face Wear) 19 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X1.54 Medium-Severity Weathering (Surface Wear) FIG. X1.55 High-Severity Weathering (Surface Wear) 20 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X2.50 High-Severity Spalling, Joint FIG. X3.1 Alligator Cracking FIG. X3.2 Bleeding 38 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X3.6 Corrugation FIG. X3.9 Edge Cracking (metric units) FIG. X3.7 Depression FIG. X3.10 Joint Reﬂection Cracking FIG. X3.11 Joint Reﬂection Cracking (metric units) 39 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X3.15 Longitudinal/Transverse Cracking (metric units) FIG. X3.16 Patching and Utility Cut Patching FIG. X3.17 Polished Aggregate 40 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X3.18 Potholes FIG. X3.21 Rutting FIG. X3.22 Shoving FIG. X3.19 Potholes (metric units) FIG. X3.20 Railroad Crossing FIG. X3.23 Slippage Cracking 41 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X3.24 Swell FIG. X3.25 Raveling FIG. X3.26 Weathering 42 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIG. X3.27 Total Deduct Value X4. DEDUCT VALUE CURVES FOR CONCRETE FIG. X4.1 Blowups FIG. X4.3 Divided Slab 43 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jan 4 16:04:49 EST 2010 Downloaded/printed by Bonner Gilmore (CH2M HILL) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. ---PAGE BREAK--- DEDUCT VALUE CURVES FOR ASPHALT APPENDIX A ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- LAND • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE Appendix B 2010 and 2017 PCI Maps ---PAGE BREAK--- CO RD 13 CO RD 186 AMANDA PINES ELKHORN RANCH ESTATES CO RD 1 CO RD 29 CO RD 186 CO RD 17 CO RD 194 FOXWOODS RANCHES/ ESTATES MEADOW STATION CO RD 1 CO RD 1 CO RD 1 CO RD 166 DEER CREEK ESTATES DEER CREEK FARMS CO RD 13 CO RD 17-21 SPRING VALLEY RANCH TNM RANCHES CO RD 29 OUTBACK ESTATES CO RD 174 CO RD 21 CO RD 166 CO RD 166 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD CO RD 194 CO RD 21 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD SECTION 2 COYOTE HILLS CO RD 158 CO RD 5 CO RD 5 CO RD 150 CO RD 146 CO RD 154 CO RD 154 CO RD 29 CO RD 162 CO RD 154 CO RD 142 CO RD 158 BRITANIE RIDGE STAGE RUN WILD POINTE CO RD 146 CO RD 142 CO RD 13 OVERLAND CO RD 17 CO RD 21 CO RD 17 SOUTHERN HILLS ELBERT STREET CO RD 3 CO RD 128 CO RD 124 CO RD 114 CO RD 9-15 CO RD 9 CO RD 122 CO RD 118 CO RD 5 CO RD 5 CO RD 13 CO RD 106 CO RD 106 CO RD 5 CO RD 21 CO RD 25 CO RD 150 CO RD 33 CO RD 37 CO RD 134 CO RD 33 CO RD 134 CO RD 17-21 HWY 86 HWY 86 CO RD 33 CO RD 33 CO RD 37 CO RD 98 CO RD 112 CO RD 102 CO RD 94 CO RD 41 CO RD 13 CO RD 1 CO RD 74 CO RD 86 CO RD 82 CO RD 9 CO RD 110 CO RD 74-82 CO RD 82 KIOWA CREEK KIOWA CREEK ELBERT ROAD SECTION 1 ELBERT ROAD SECTION 1 ELBERT ROAD SECTION 1 CO RD 120 CO RD 45 CO RD 49 CO RD 102 CO RD 98 CO RD 21 CO RD 146 CO RD 90 CO RD 49 CO RD 126 DOUGLAS COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY EL PASO COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY ARAPAHOE COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY CIMARRON ELBERT ROAD SECTION 2 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD SECTION 1 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD SECTION 2 CO RD 150 CO RD 132 LEGEND N.T.S. PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI), RATING SCALE & SUGGESTED COLORS GOOD SATISFACTORY FAIR POOR VERY POOR SERIOUS FAILED 100 85 70 55 40 25 10 0 CO RD 125 CO RD 80 CO RD 125 HWY 24 CO RD 74 EL PASO COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY CO RD 33 CO RD 117 HWY 24 CO RD 86 CO RD 127 DOUGLAS COUNTY ARAPAHOE COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY EL PASO COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY LINCOLN COUNTY KEY MAP N.T.S. ELBERT COUNTY LINCOLN COUNTY PROJ DATE DATE NO. DSGN DR REVISION CHK APVD BY APVD SHEET DWG VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. 0 1" 1437 LARIMER STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202 AUGUST 2010 JSO JSO BWS BWS 218 CHEYENNE STREET KIOWA, CO 80117 ELBERT COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT PHASE 1 & 2 PAVEMENT EVALUATION FIGURE 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- CO RD 13 CO RD 186 AMANDA PINES ELKHORN RANCH ESTATES CO RD 1 CO RD 29 CO RD 186 CO RD 17 CO RD 194 FOXWOODS RANCHES/ ESTATES MEADOW STATION CO RD 1 CO RD 1 CO RD 1 CO RD 166 DEER CREEK ESTATES DEER CREEK FARMS CO RD 13 CO RD 17-21 SPRING VALLEY RANCH TNM RANCHES CO RD 29 OUTBACK ESTATES CO RD 174 CO RD 21 CO RD 166 CO RD 166 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD CO RD 194 CO RD 21 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD SECTION 2 COYOTE HILLS CO RD 158 CO RD 5 CO RD 5 CO RD 150 CO RD 146 CO RD 154 CO RD 154 CO RD 29 CO RD 162 CO RD 154 CO RD 142 CO RD 158 BRITANIE RIDGE STAGE RUN WILD POINTE CO RD 146 CO RD 142 CO RD 13 OVERLAND CO RD 17 CO RD 21 CO RD 17 SOUTHERN HILLS ELBERT STREET CO RD 3 CO RD 128 CO RD 124 CO RD 114 CO RD 9-15 CO RD 9 CO RD 122 CO RD 118 CO RD 5 CO RD 5 CO RD 13 CO RD 106 CO RD 106 CO RD 5 CO RD 21 CO RD 25 CO RD 150 CO RD 33 CO RD 37 CO RD 134 CO RD 33 CO RD 134 CO RD 17-21 HWY 86 HWY 86 CO RD 33 CO RD 33 CO RD 37 CO RD 98 CO RD 112 CO RD 102 CO RD 94 CO RD 41 CO RD 13 CO RD 1 CO RD 74 CO RD 86 CO RD 82 CO RD 9 CO RD 110 CO RD 74-82 CO RD 82 KIOWA CREEK KIOWA CREEK ELBERT ROAD SECTION 1 ELBERT ROAD SECTION 1 ELBERT ROAD SECTION 1 CO RD 120 CO RD 45 CO RD 49 CO RD 102 CO RD 98 CO RD 21 CO RD 146 CO RD 90 CO RD 49 CO RD 126 DOUGLAS COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY EL PASO COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY ARAPAHOE COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY CIMARRON ELBERT ROAD SECTION 2 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD SECTION 1 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD SECTION 2 CO RD 150 CO RD 132 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD SECTION 2 LEGEND N.T.S. PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI), RATING SCALE & SUGGESTED COLORS GOOD SATISFACTORY FAIR POOR VERY POOR SERIOUS FAILED 100 85 70 55 40 25 10 0 DOUGLAS COUNTY ARAPAHOE COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY EL PASO COUNTY ELBERT COUNTY LINCOLN COUNTY KEY MAP N.T.S. ELBERT COUNTY LINCOLN COUNTY PROJ DATE DATE NO. DSGN DR REVISION CHK APVD BY APVD SHEET DWG VERIFY SCALE BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. 0 1" 1437 LARIMER STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202 AUGUST 2010 JSO JSO BWS BWS 218 CHEYENNE STREET KIOWA, CO 80117 ELBERT COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT 2017 PHASE 1 PAVEMENT EVALUATION FIGURE 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- LAND • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE Appendix C PCI Results – County Roads ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 1 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 1 10 CR 186 M1 5,280. 43.00 80.00 County Road 1 20 M1 M2 5,280. 39.00 85.00 County Road 1 30 M2 M3 5,280. 33.00 83.00 County Road 1 40 M3 M4 5,280. 46.00 81.00 County Road 1 50 M4 CR 166 5,412.7 39.00 74.00 OVERALL 26,532.7 41.00 81.00 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 1 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 1 20 M1 M2 5,280. 39.00 85.00 2022 CR, ED 2,428.80 $ 80.00 County Road 1 30 M2 M3 5,280. 33.00 83.00 2022 CR, ED 2,428.80 $ 78.00 County Road 1 40 M3 M4 5,280. 46.00 81.00 2022 CR, ED 2,428.80 $ 76.00 County Road 1 10 CR 186 M1 5,280. 43.00 80.00 2022 CR, ED 2,428.80 $ 75.00 County Road 1 50 M4 CR 166 5,412.7 39.00 74.00 2022 CR, ED, CS 49,381.87 $ 84.00 OVERALL 26,532.7 41.00 81.00 59,097.07 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 5 (NORTH) INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 5 North 10 Hilltop Rd M1 5,280. 80.00 87.00 County Road 5 North 20 M1 Starling Ln 450. 84.00 86.00 OVERALL 5,730. 82.00 87.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 25% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 75% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 5 (NORTH) INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 5 North 10 Hilltop Rd M1 5,280. 80.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 County Road 5 North 20 M1 Starling Ln 450. 84.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 OVERALL 82.00 87.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 5 (NORTH) ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 5 (SOUTH) INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 5 South 10 Coyote Dr Pawnee Pkwy 4,100. 50.00 71.00 OVERALL 4,100. 50.00 71.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐ 85, 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 FAIR 56‐70 33% POOR 41‐55 67% 2010 ‐ ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 5 (SOUTH) INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 5 South 10 Coyote Dr Pawnee Pkwy 4,100. 50.00 71.00 2021 CR, ED, CS 36,429.87 $ 83.00 OVERALL 4,100. 50.00 71.00 36,429.87 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 5 (SOUTH) ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 9-15 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 9-15 10 CR 132 M1 5,280. 41.00 94.00 County Road 9-15 20 M1 Stage Run Tr 3,165. 41.00 94.00 OVERALL 41.00 94.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 FAIR 56‐70 40% VERY POOR 26‐40 40% SERIOUS 11‐25 20% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 9-15 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 9-15 10 CR 132 M1 5,280. 41.00 94.00 TBD 89.00 County Road 9-15 20 M1 Stage Run Tr 3,165. 41.00 94.00 TBD 89.00 OVERALL 41.00 94.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- ELBERT STREET / COUNTY ROAD 132 / COUNTY ROAD 9‐15 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 13 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 13 01 End M1 5,280. 38.00 76.00 County Road 13 02 M1 M2 5,280. 30.00 64.00 County Road 13 03 M2 M3 5,280. 30.00 62.00 County Road 13 04 M3 M4 5,280. 25.00 53.00 County Road 13 05 M4 M5 5,280. 33.00 80.00 County Road 13 06 M5 M6 5,280. 33.00 64.00 County Road 13 07 M6 M7 5,280. 33.00 63.00 County Road 13 08 M7 CR 86 4,915. 33.00 79.00 OVERALL 41,875. 33.00 68.00 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 37% FAIR 56‐70, 50% POOR 41‐55, 13% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 13 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 13 05 M4 M5 5,280. 33.00 80.00 2019 CR, ED 2,238.72 $ 76.00 County Road 13 08 M7 CR 86 4,915. 33.00 79.00 2019 CR, ED, CS 41,331.87 $ 81.00 County Road 13 01 End M1 5,280. 38.00 76.00 2019 CR, ED, CS 44,401.28 $ 81.00 County Road 13 02 M1 M2 5,280. 30.00 64.00 2019 CR, ED, CS 44,401.28 $ 81.00 County Road 13 06 M5 M6 5,280. 33.00 64.00 2019 CR, ED, CS 44,401.28 $ 81.00 County Road 13 07 M6 M7 5,280. 33.00 63.00 2019 CR, ED, CS 44,401.28 $ 81.00 County Road 13 03 M2 M3 5,280. 30.00 62.00 2019 CR, ED, CS 44,401.28 $ 81.00 County Road 13 04 M3 M4 5,280. 25.00 53.00 2019 CR, ED, CS 46,640.00 $ 81.00 OVERALL 41,875. 33.00 68.00 312,216.99 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 13 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 17-21 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 17-21 10 BONNIE RIDGE HWY 86 4,289.86 60.00 71.00 County Road 17-21 30 HWY 86 M1 6,237.13 60.00 86.00 County Road 17-21 40 M2 M3 6,237.13 60.00 86.00 County Road 17-21 50 M3 M4 6,237.13 60.00 69.00 County Road 17-21 60 M4 M5 6,237.13 60.00 58.00 County Road 17-21 70 M5 M6 6,237.13 60.00 61.00 County Road 17-21 80 M6 M7 6,237.13 60.00 70.00 County Road 17-21 90 M7 CR 106 6,237.13 60.00 62.00 OVERALL 47,949.77 60.00 70.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 26% SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 9% FAIR 56‐70, 65% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 17% FAIR 56‐70 56% POOR 41‐55 22% VERY POOR 26‐40 5% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 17-21 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 17-21 30 HWY 86 M1 6,237.13 60.00 86.00 2020 CR, ED 2,719.39 $ 83.00 County Road 17-21 40 M2 M3 6,237.13 60.00 86.00 2020 CR, ED 2,719.39 $ 83.00 County Road 17-21 10 BONNIE RIDGE HWY 86 4,289.86 60.00 71.00 2020 CR, ED, CS 37,095.85 $ 82.00 County Road 17-21 80 M6 M7 6,237.13 60.00 70.00 2020 CR, ED, CS 53,934.54 $ 82.00 County Road 17-21 50 M3 M4 6,237.13 60.00 69.00 2020 CR, ED, CS 53,934.54 $ 82.00 County Road 17-21 90 M7 CR 106 6,237.13 60.00 62.00 2020 CR, ED, CS 53,934.54 $ 82.00 County Road 17-21 70 M5 M6 6,237.13 60.00 61.00 2020 CR, ED, CS 53,934.54 $ 82.00 County Road 17-21 60 M4 M5 6,237.13 60.00 58.00 2020 CR, ED, CS 56,653.93 $ 82.00 OVERALL 47,949.77 60.00 70.00 314,926.73 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 17‐21 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 21 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 21 10 CR 166 M1 5,280. 54.00 89.00 County Road 21 20 M1 M2 5,280. 57.00 92.00 County Road 21 30 M2 M3 5,280. 46.00 92.00 County Road 21 40 M3 M4 5,280. 74.00 93.00 County Road 21 50 M4 M5 5,280. 69.00 85.00 County Road 21 60 M5 M6 5,280. 47.00 80.00 County Road 21 70 M6 HWY 86 4,957.5 61.00 82.00 OVERALL 36,637.5 58.00 88.00 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 58% SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 42% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 21 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 21 10 CR 166 M1 5,280. 54.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 County Road 21 20 M1 M2 5,280. 57.00 92.00 TBD 87.00 County Road 21 30 M2 M3 5,280. 46.00 92.00 TBD 87.00 County Road 21 40 M3 M4 5,280. 74.00 93.00 TBD 88.00 County Road 21 50 M4 M5 5,280. 69.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 County Road 21 60 M5 M6 5,280. 47.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 County Road 21 70 M6 HWY 86 4,957.5 61.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 OVERALL 58.00 88.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 21 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 29 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 29 30 M2 M3 5,035.95 60.00 88.00 County Road 29 40 M3 M4 6,714.61 60.00 87.00 County Road 29 50 M4 M5 6,714.61 60.00 86.00 County Road 29 60 M5 M6 6,714.61 60.00 84.00 County Road 29 70 M6 M7 6,714.61 60.00 86.00 County Road 29 80 M7 CR 166 6,714.61 60.00 84.00 OVERALL 38,609. 60.00 86.00 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 65% SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 35% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 29 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 29 30 M2 M3 5,035.95 60.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 County Road 29 40 M3 M4 6,714.61 60.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 County Road 29 50 M4 M5 6,714.61 60.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 County Road 29 60 M5 M6 6,714.61 60.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 County Road 29 70 M6 M7 6,714.61 60.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 County Road 29 80 M7 CR 166 6,714.61 60.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 OVERALL 60.00 86.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 29 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 33 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 33 10 End End 1,280. 71.00 81.00 OVERALL 1,280. 71.00 81.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐ 85, 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 67% VERY POOR 26‐40 33% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 33 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 33 10 End End 1,280. 71.00 81.00 TBD 76.00 OVERALL 71.00 81.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 33 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 45 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 45 01 CR 86 M1 5,280. 55.00 74.00 County Road 45 02 M1 M2 5,280. 74.00 80.00 County Road 45 03 M2 M3 5,280. 57.00 87.00 County Road 45 04 M3 CR 118 4,360. 63.00 91.00 OVERALL 20,200. 63.00 83.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 48% SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 52% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 12% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 12% FAIR 56‐70 50% POOR 41‐55 13% VERY POOR 26‐40 13% CR 45 ‐ ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 45 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 45 01 CR 86 M1 5,280. 55.00 74.00 TBD 69.00 County Road 45 02 M1 M2 5,280. 74.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 County Road 45 03 M2 M3 5,280. 57.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 County Road 45 04 M3 CR 118 4,360. 63.00 91.00 TBD 86.00 OVERALL 63.00 83.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 45 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 106 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 106 10 CR 21 M1 5,280. n/a 86.00 County Road 106 20 M1 ELBERT RD 5,289.1 n/a 88.00 OVERALL 10,569.1 n/a 87.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 106 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 106 10 CR 21 M1 5,280. n/a 86.00 TBD 81.00 County Road 106 20 M1 ELBERT RD 5,289.1 n/a 88.00 TBD 83.00 OVERALL n/a 87.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 106 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 124 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 124 10 CR 17-21 End 4,140. .00 58.00 OVERALL 4,140. 0.00 58.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY FAIR 56‐70, 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 FAILED 0‐10 100% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 124 INSPECTION DATE: 7/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 124 10 CR 17-21 End 4,140. .00 58.00 2018 CR, ED, CS 32,976.48 $ 80 OVERALL 4,140. 0.00 58.00 32,976.48 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 124 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 125 INSPECTION DATE: 8/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 125 10 M1 Antelope St 5,280. 49.00 74.00 OVERALL 5,280. 49.00 74.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐ 85, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 FAIR 56‐70 28% POOR 41‐55 43% VERY POOR 26‐40 29% CR 125 ‐ ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 125 INSPECTION DATE: 8/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 125 County Road 125 10 M1 Antelope St 5,280. 74.00 TBD 69.00 OVERALL 5,280.00 74.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Rejuvinator ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 132-Elbert Street INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 132 - Elbert St 10 CR 136 M1 5,280. 63.00 93.00 County Road 132 - Elbert St 20 M1 CR 9/15 3,295. .00 93.00 OVERALL 8,575. 38.00 93.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 20% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 20% VERY POOR 26‐40 20% FAILED 0‐10 40% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 132-Elbert Street INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST REHAB COST County Road 132 - Elbert St 10 CR 136 M1 5,280. 63.00 93.00 TBD 88.00 County Road 132 - Elbert St 20 M1 CR 9/15 3,295. .00 93.00 TBD 88.00 OVERALL 38.00 93.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- ELBERT STREET / COUNTY ROAD 132 / COUNTY ROAD 9‐15 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 142 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 142 10 Cimarron Tr CR 13 3,050. 53.00 75.00 OVERALL 3,050. 53.00 75.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐85 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 FAIR 56‐70 33% POOR 41‐55 67% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 142 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 142 10 Cimarron Tr CR 13 3,050. 53.00 75.00 2021 CR, ED, CS 27,100.27 $ 83.00 OVERALL 3,050. 53.00 75.00 27,100.27 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 142 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 146 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 146 10 Delbert Rd CR 5 5,100. 49.00 73.00 OVERALL 5,100. 49.00 73.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐85 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 34% POOR 41‐55 33% SERIOUS 11‐25 33% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 146 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 146 10 Delbert Rd CR 5 5,100. 49.00 73.00 2021 CR, ED, CS 45,315.20 $ 83 OVERALL 5,100. 49.00 73.00 45,315.20 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 146 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 150 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 150 10 CR 5 M1 5,280. 77.00 82.00 County Road 150 20 M1 CR 13 4,878. 84.00 74.00 OVERALL 10,158. 81.00 78.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐ 85 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 20% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 60% FAIR 56‐70 20% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 150 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 150 10 CR 5 M1 5,280. 77.00 82.00 2021 CR, ED 2,365.44 $ 80.00 County Road 150 20 M1 CR 13 4,878. 84.00 74.00 2021 CR, ED, CS 43,342.66 $ 83.00 OVERALL 10,158. 81.00 78.00 45,708.10 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 150 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 154 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 154 10 CR 21 End 4,860. 81.00 90.00 OVERALL 4,860. 81.00 90.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 100% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 154 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 154 10 CR 21 End 4,860. 81.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 OVERALL 81.00 90.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 154 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 158 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 158 10 Delbert Rd M1 5,280. 81.00 74.00 County Road 158 20 M1 M2 5,280. 59.00 68.00 County Road 158 30 M2 CR 13 5,180. 70.00 72.00 OVERALL 15,740. 70.00 83.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 66% FAIR 56‐70, 34% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 20% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 50% FAIR 56‐70 20% SERIOUS 11‐25 10% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 158 INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 158 10 Delbert Rd M1 5,280. 81.00 74.00 2017 89.00 County Road 158 20 M1 M2 5,280. 59.00 68.00 2017 89.00 County Road 158 30 M2 CR 13 5,180. 70.00 72.00 2017 89.00 OVERALL 70.00 71.33 Code * AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT, THIS ROAD WAS WAS CR PROPOSED TO BE RECONSTRUCTED IN 2017 ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 158 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 166 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 166 10 CR 1 M1 6,959.94 47.00 51.00 County Road 166 20 M1 M2 6,959.94 40.00 70.00 County Road 166 30 M2 M3 6,959.94 45.00 75.00 County Road 166 40 M3 M4 6,959.94 57.00 85.00 County Road 166 50 M4 M5 6,959.94 41.00 88.00 County Road 166 60 M5 M6 1,740.02 50.60 62.00 OVERALL 36,539.72 47.00 73.00 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 19% SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 38% FAIR 56‐70, 24% POOR 41‐55, 19% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 166 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 166 10 CR 1 M1 6,959.94 47.00 51.00 TBD 46.00 County Road 166 20 M1 M2 6,959.94 40.00 70.00 TBD 65.00 County Road 166 30 M2 M3 6,959.94 45.00 75.00 TBD 70.00 County Road 166 40 M3 M4 6,959.94 57.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 County Road 166 50 M4 M5 6,959.94 41.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 County Road 166 60 M5 M6 1,740.02 50.60 62.00 TBD 57.00 OVERALL 47.00 73.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 166 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 174 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 174 10 CR 129 Taos Trail 940. 74.00 72.00 OVERALL 940. 74.00 72.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐ 85, 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 100% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 174 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 174 10 CR 129 Taos Trail 940. 74.00 72.00 2021 CR, ED, CS 8,352.21 $ 83 OVERALL 940. 74.00 72.00 8,352.21 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 174 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 186 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 186 10 Delbert Rd M1 5,485.74 62.00 58.00 County Road 186 20 M1 M2 5,485.74 42.00 55.00 County Road 186 30 M2 M3 5,485.74 67.00 42.00 County Road 186 40 M3 M4 5,485.74 23.00 71.00 OVERALL 21,942.96 49.00 57.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 71‐85, 25% FAIR 56‐70, 25% POOR 41‐55, 50% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 FAIR 56‐70 58% VERY POOR 26‐40 25% SERIOUS 11‐25 17% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 186 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 186 40 M3 M4 5,485.74 23.00 71.00 2018 CR, ED, CS 44,825.81 $ 80 County Road 186 10 Delbert Rd M1 5,485.74 62.00 58.00 2018 CR, ED, CS 47,085.93 $ 80 County Road 186 20 M1 M2 5,485.74 42.00 55.00 2018 CR, ED, CS 47,085.93 $ 80 County Road 186 30 M2 M3 5,485.74 67.00 42.00 2018 CR, ED, CS 47,085.93 $ 80 OVERALL 21,942.96 49.00 57.00 186,083.62 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 186 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 194 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI County Road 194 10 CR 17 M1 5,280. 16.00 87.00 County Road 194 20 M1 M2 5,280. 18.00 88.00 County Road 194 30 M2 M3 5,280. 37.00 90.00 County Road 194 40 M3 M4 5,280. 28.00 89.00 County Road 194 50 M4 PATRICK T 966.1 28.00 88.00 OVERALL 22,086.1 28.00 89.00 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100, 100% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: 194 INSPECTION DATE: 7/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI County Road 194 10 CR 17 M1 5,280. 16.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 County Road 194 20 M1 M2 5,280. 18.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 County Road 194 30 M2 M3 5,280. 37.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 County Road 194 40 M3 M4 5,280. 28.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 County Road 194 50 M4 PATRICK T 966.1 28.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 OVERALL 28.00 89.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD 194 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: Elbert Road INSPECTION DATE: 7/17/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI ELBERT RD 10 HWY 86 M1 6,061.72 50.00 86.00 ELBERT RD 20 M1 M2 6,061.72 50.00 86.00 ELBERT RD 30 M2 M3 6,061.72 50.00 88.00 ELBERT RD 40 M3 M4 6,061.72 50.00 88.00 ELBERT RD 50 M4 M5 6,061.72 50.00 87.00 ELBERT RD 60 M5 M6 6,061.72 50.00 74.00 ELBERT RD 70 M6 M7 6,061.72 50.00 87.00 ELBERT RD 80 M7 M8 6,061.72 50.00 88.00 ELBERT RD 90 M8 M9 6,061.72 50.00 87.00 ELBERT RD 100 M9 M10 6,061.72 50.00 79.00 ELBERT RD 110 M10 M11 6,061.72 50.00 78.00 ELBERT RD 120 M11 M12 6,061.72 78.00 79.00 ELBERT RD 130 M12 M13 6,061.72 78.00 78.00 ELBERT RD 140 M13 M14 6,061.72 78.00 64.00 OVERALL 84,864.08 82.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 57% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 36% FAIR 56‐70 7% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 3% FAIR 56‐70 43% POOR 41‐55 27% VERY POOR 26‐40 21% SERIOUS 11‐25 3% FAILED 0‐10 3% 2010 ELBERT ROAD, SECTION 1 ‐ ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐ 85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 GOOD 86‐100 13% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 80% FAIR 56‐70 7% 2010 ELBERT ROAD, SECTION 2 ‐ ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: Elbert Road INSPECTION DATE: 7/17/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI ELBERT RD 10 HWY 86 M1 6,061.72 50.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 ELBERT RD 20 M1 M2 6,061.72 50.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 ELBERT RD 30 M2 M3 6,061.72 50.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 ELBERT RD 40 M3 M4 6,061.72 50.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 ELBERT RD 50 M4 M5 6,061.72 50.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 ELBERT RD 60 M5 M6 6,061.72 50.00 74.00 TBD 69.00 ELBERT RD 70 M6 M7 6,061.72 50.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 ELBERT RD 80 M7 M8 6,061.72 50.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 ELBERT RD 90 M8 M9 6,061.72 50.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 ELBERT RD 100 M9 M10 6,061.72 50.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 ELBERT RD 110 M10 M11 6,061.72 50.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 ELBERT RD 120 M11 M12 6,061.72 78.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 ELBERT RD 130 M12 M13 6,061.72 78.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 ELBERT RD 140 M13 M14 6,061.72 78.00 64.00 TBD 59.00 OVERALL 82.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- ELBERT ROAD ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: Kiowa-Bennett INSPECTION DATE: 7/17/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI KIOWA-BENNET RD 10 CR 194 M1 6,543.38 74.00 85.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 20 M1 M2 6,543.38 74.00 86.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 30 M2 M3 6,543.38 74.00 84.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 40 M3 M4 6,543.38 83.00 88.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 50 M4 M5 6,543.38 83.00 89.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 60 M5 M6 6,543.38 83.00 88.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 70 M6 M7 6,543.38 83.00 82.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 80 M7 M8 6,543.38 83.00 79.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 90 M8 M9 6,543.38 83.00 69.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 100 M9 M10 6,543.38 83.00 71.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 110 M10 M11 6,543.38 83.00 75.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 120 M11 M12 6,543.38 83.00 76.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 130 M12 M13 6,543.38 83.00 75.00 OVERALL 85,063.94 81.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 31% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 61% FAIR 56‐70 8% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 37% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 18% FAIR 56‐70 36% SERIOUS 11‐25 9% 2010 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD, SECTION 1 ‐ ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 GOOD 86‐100 68% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 18% FAIR 56‐70 14% 2010 KIOWA BENNETT ROAD, SECTION 2 ‐ ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTY ROAD: Kiowa-Bennett INSPECTION DATE: 7/17/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI KIOWA-BENNET RD 10 CR 194 M1 6,543.38 74.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 20 M1 M2 6,543.38 74.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 30 M2 M3 6,543.38 74.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 40 M3 M4 6,543.38 83.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 50 M4 M5 6,543.38 83.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 60 M5 M6 6,543.38 83.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 70 M6 M7 6,543.38 83.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 80 M7 M8 6,543.38 83.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 90 M8 M9 6,543.38 83.00 69.00 TBD 64.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 100 M9 M10 6,543.38 83.00 71.00 TBD 66.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 110 M10 M11 6,543.38 83.00 75.00 TBD 70.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 120 M11 M12 6,543.38 83.00 76.00 TBD 71.00 KIOWA-BENNET RD 130 M12 M13 6,543.38 83.00 75.00 TBD 70.00 OVERALL 81.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- KIOWA‐BENNETT ROAD ---PAGE BREAK--- LAND • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE Appendix D PCI Results – Subdivision Roads ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: AMANDA PINES INSPECTION DATE: 4/10/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Amanda Pines Drive 10 CR 186 Sugar Pine Cir 1,980. 76.00 85.00 Amanda Pines Drive 20 Sugar Pine Cir Sunsetview Way 1,400. 76.00 80.00 Amanda Pines Drive 30 Sunsetview Way Black Spruce Ln 680. 76.00 81.00 Amanda Pines Drive 40 Black Spruce Ln Needle Leaf Ln 1,850. 76.00 79.00 Amanda Pines Drive 50 Needle Leaf Ln Bristle Cone Ct 1,520. 76.00 80.00 Amanda Pines Drive 60 Bristle Cone Ct End 1,430. 76.00 66.00 Andrea Circle 10 Sunsetview Way End 1,150. 83.00 86.00 Black Spruce Lane 10 End Amanda Pines Dr 700. 75.00 83.00 Black Spruce Lane 20 Amanda Pines Dr End 1,120. 75.00 80.00 Bristle Cone Court 10 Amanda Pines Dr CR 186 1,305. 78.00 79.00 Indian Brush Court 10 End Rolling Hills Pl 450. 80.00 75.00 Indian Brush Court 20 Rolling Hills Pl End 735. 80.00 90.00 Needle Leaf Lane 10 Amanda Pines Dr End 760. 69.00 75.00 Rolling Hills Place 10 Sunsetview Pl Indian Brush Ct 1,580. 87.00 77.00 Rolling Hills Place 20 Indian Brush Ct Delbert Rd 630. 87.00 77.00 Sugar Pine Circle 10 Amanda Pines Dr End 540. 88.00 87.00 Sunsetview Way 10 Amanda Pines Dr North Pines 870. 86.00 77.00 Sunsetview Way 20 North Pines Andrea Cir 580. 86.00 60.00 Sunsetview Way 30 Andrea Cir Rolling Hills Pl 780. 86.00 88.00 Sunsetview Way 40 Rolling Hills Pl End 950. 86.00 88.00 OVERALL 78.00 79.65 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 19.78% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 70.66% FAIR 70‐56, 9.57% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 14% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 73% FAIR 56‐70 13% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 77 60 86 88 77 75 77 90 INDIAN BRUSH 88 73 76 68 49 69 76 74 75 77 75 70 76 82 LOBLOLLY FRAISER FIR ROLLING HILLS SUNSETVIEW SILVER FIR ANDREA NORTH PINES INDIAN BRUSH NORTH PINES SCOTH PINE RED CEDAR NOBEL CONIFER AMANDA PINES SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: AMANDA PINES INSPECTION DATE: 4/10/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Amanda Pines Drive 10 CR 186 Sugar Pine Cir 1,980. 76.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 Amanda Pines Drive 20 Sugar Pine Cir Sunsetview Way 1,400. 76.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Amanda Pines Drive 30 Sunsetview Way Black Spruce Ln 680. 76.00 81.00 TBD 76.00 Amanda Pines Drive 40 Black Spruce Ln Needle Leaf Ln 1,850. 76.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 Amanda Pines Drive 50 Needle Leaf Ln Bristle Cone Ct 1,520. 76.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Amanda Pines Drive 60 Bristle Cone Ct End 1,430. 76.00 66.00 TBD 61.00 Andrea Circle 10 Sunsetview Way End 1,150. 83.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 Black Spruce Lane 10 End Amanda Pines Dr 700. 75.00 83.00 TBD 78.00 Black Spruce Lane 20 Amanda Pines Dr End 1,120. 75.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Bristle Cone Court 10 Amanda Pines Dr CR 186 1,305. 78.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 Indian Brush Court 10 End Rolling Hills Pl 450. 80.00 75.00 TBD 70.00 Indian Brush Court 20 Rolling Hills Pl End 735. 80.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Needle Leaf Lane 10 Amanda Pines Dr End 760. 69.00 75.00 TBD 70.00 Rolling Hills Place 10 Sunsetview Pl Indian Brush Ct 1,580. 87.00 77.00 TBD 72.00 Rolling Hills Place 20 Indian Brush Ct Delbert Rd 630. 87.00 77.00 TBD 72.00 Sugar Pine Circle 10 Amanda Pines Dr End 540. 88.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 Sunsetview Way 10 Amanda Pines Dr North Pines 870. 86.00 77.00 TBD 72.00 Sunsetview Way 20 North Pines Andrea Cir 580. 86.00 60.00 TBD 55.00 Sunsetview Way 30 Andrea Cir Rolling Hills Pl 780. 86.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 Sunsetview Way 40 Rolling Hills Pl End 950. 86.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 OVERALL 21,010. 78.00 79.65 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: BRITANIE RIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/7/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Black Forest Drive 30 Bobcat Cr Johnson St 2,040. 95.00 72.00 Black Forest Drive 40 Johnson St End 780. 95.00 78.00 Black Forest Drive 10 Wild Horse Tr Tarie Tr 1,445. 95.00 87.00 Black Forest Drive 20 Tarie Tr Bobcat Cr 1,270. 95.00 80.00 Bobcat Circle 10 Black Forest Dr End 975. 84.00 72.00 Coyote Circle 10 Tarie Tr End 1,200. 94.00 79.00 Johnson Street 10 Black Forest Dr CR 154 570. 92.00 93.00 Melanie Circle 10 Wild Horse Tr End 1,300. 84.00 78.00 N Big Buck Circle 10 Wild Horse Tr End 1,000. 100.00 80.00 S Big Buck Circle 10 Wild Horse Tr End 495. 86.00 91.00 Tarie Trail 10 Wild Horse Cr Coyote Cr 1,440. 94.00 82.00 Tarie Trail 20 Coyote Cr Black Forest Dr 1,360. 94.00 83.00 Wild Horse Trail 10 CR 154 Melanie Cr 655. 87.00 88.00 Wild Horse Trail 20 Melanie Cr Black Forest Dr 400. 87.00 88.00 Wild Horse Trail 30 Black Forest Dr Tarie Tr 1,300. 87.00 90.00 Wild Horse Trail 40 Tarie Trail Big Buck Cir 2,230. 87.00 88.00 Wild Horse Trail 50 Big Buck Cir End 400. 87.00 88.00 OVERALL 91.00 83.35 . ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 39.74% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 60.26% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 80% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 20% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- BLACK FOREST 79 78 93 72 72 BOBCAT CIRCLE 80 87 88 88 78 83 82 90 88 80 88 91 COYOTE CIRCLE JOHNSON BLACK FOREST TARIE TRAIL MELANIE CR WILD HORSE WILD HORSE NORTH BIG BUCK SOUTH BIG BUCK WILD HORSE BRITANIE RIDGE SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: BRITANIE RIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/7/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Black Forest Drive 30 Bobcat Cr Johnson St 2,040. 95.00 72.00 TBD 67.00 Black Forest Drive 40 Johnson St End 780. 95.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 Black Forest Drive 10 Wild Horse Tr Tarie Tr 1,445. 95.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 Black Forest Drive 20 Tarie Tr Bobcat Cr 1,270. 95.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Bobcat Circle 10 Black Forest Dr End 975. 84.00 72.00 TBD 67.00 Coyote Circle 10 Tarie Tr End 1,200. 94.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 Johnson Street 10 Black Forest Dr CR 154 570. 92.00 93.00 TBD 88.00 Melanie Circle 10 Wild Horse Tr End 1,300. 84.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 N Big Buck Circle 10 Wild Horse Tr End 1,000. 100.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 S Big Buck Circle 10 Wild Horse Tr End 495. 86.00 91.00 TBD 86.00 Tarie Trail 10 Wild Horse Cr Coyote Cr 1,440. 94.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Tarie Trail 20 Coyote Cr Black Forest Dr 1,360. 94.00 83.00 TBD 78.00 Wild Horse Trail 10 CR 154 Melanie Cr 655. 87.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 Wild Horse Trail 20 Melanie Cr Black Forest Dr 400. 87.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 Wild Horse Trail 30 Black Forest Dr Tarie Tr 1,300. 87.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Wild Horse Trail 40 Tarie Trail Big Buck Cir 2,230. 87.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 Wild Horse Trail 50 Big Buck Cir End 400. 87.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 OVERALL 18,860. 91.00 83.35 . Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: COYOTE HILLS INSPECTION DATE: 4/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Coyote Trail 10 Hilltop Rd Howling Cir 2,610. 82.00 75.00 Coyote Trail 20 Howling Cir CR 5 3,865. 82.00 79.00 Howling Circle 10 End Coyote Tr 690. 84.00 76.00 OVERALL 82.00 76.67 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 40% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 60% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 75 79 76 COYOTE TRAIL HOWLING CIR COYOTE TRAIL COYOTE HILLS SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: COYOTE HILLS INSPECTION DATE: 4/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Coyote Trail 20 Howling Cir CR 5 3,865. 82.00 79.00 2021 CR,ED,SS 27,415.73 $ 83.00 Howling Circle 10 End Coyote Tr 690. 84.00 76.00 2021 CR,ED,SS 4,894.40 $ 83.00 Coyote Trail 10 Hilltop Rd Howling Cir 2,610. 82.00 75.00 2021 CR,ED,SS 18,513.60 $ 83.00 OVERALL 7,165. 82.00 76.67 50,823.73 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- COYOTE HILLS ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: CIMARRON INSPECTION DATE: 4/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Cimarron Trail 10 CR 142 Morgan Trail 1,290. 36.00 53.00 Cimarron Trail 20 Morgan Trail Appaloosa Trail 1,225. 36.00 66.00 Cimarron Trail 30 Appaloosa Trail Shetland Trail 550. 36.00 76.00 Cimarron Trail 40 Shetland Trail Arabian Trail 570. 36.00 63.00 Cimarron Trail 50 Arabian Trail Palomino Trail 1,060. 36.00 82.00 Cimarron Trail 60 Palomino Trail Morgan Trail 825. 36.00 50.00 Cimarron Trail 70 Morgan Trail Pinto Trail 1,670. 36.00 73.00 Cimarron Trail 80 Pinto Trail CR 86 1,550. 36.00 69.00 OVERALL 36.00 66.50 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 37.53% FAIR 70‐56, 38.27% POOR 55‐41, 24.20% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 20% POOR 41‐55 20% VERY POOR 26‐40 20% SERIOUS 11‐25 20% FAILED 0‐10 20% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 69 73 50 82 63 76 66 53 CIMARRON CIMARRON SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: CIMARRON INSPECTION DATE: 4/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Cimarron Trail 50 Arabian Trail Palomino Trail 1,060. 36.00 82.00 2020 CR, ED 462.16 $ 77.00 Cimarron Trail 30 Appaloosa Trail Shetland Trail 550. 36.00 76.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 3,796.83 $ 82.00 Cimarron Trail 70 Morgan Trail Pinto Trail 1,670. 36.00 73.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 11,528.57 $ 82.00 Cimarron Trail 80 Pinto Trail CR 86 1,550. 36.00 69.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 10,700.17 $ 82.00 Cimarron Trail 20 Morgan Trail Appaloosa Trail 1,225. 36.00 66.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 8,456.58 $ 82.00 Cimarron Trail 40 Shetland Trail Arabian Trail 570. 36.00 63.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 3,934.90 $ 82.00 Cimarron Trail 10 CR 142 Morgan Trail 1,290. 36.00 53.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 9,467.74 $ 82.00 Cimarron Trail 60 Palomino Trail Morgan Trail 825. 36.00 50.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 6,054.95 $ 82.00 OVERALL 8,740. 36.00 66.50 54,401.90 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction Rehab Key Description ---PAGE BREAK--- CIMARRON ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: DEER CREEK ESTATES INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Deer Creek Ranch Loo10 CR 13 Zane Grey Loop 1,045. 78.00 82.00 Deer Creek Ranch Loo20 Zane Grey Loop Zane Grey Loop 1,000. 78.00 91.00 Deer Creek Ranch Loo30 Zane Grey Loop CR 13 1,270. 78.00 86.00 John Wayne Circle 10 Zane Grey Loop End 930. 73.00 84.00 Tom Mix Circle 10 Zane Grey Loop End 665. 96.00 88.00 Zane Grey Loop 10 Deer Creek Ranch Tom Mix Cir 2,975. 82.00 86.00 Zane Grey Loop 20 Tom Mix Cir John Wayne Cir 640. 82.00 60.00 Zane Grey Loop 30 John Wayne Cir Deer Creek Ranch 2,590. 82.00 84.00 OVERALL 81.00 82.63 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 53.17% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 41.07% FAIR 70‐56, 5.76% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 12% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 88% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 60 86 86 ZANE GREY 82 91 86 84 84 ZANE GREY JOHN WAYNE DC RANCH DC RANCH TOM MIX DEER CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: DEER CREEK ESTATES INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Deer Creek Ranch Loo10 CR 13 Zane Grey Loop 1,045. 78.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Deer Creek Ranch Loo20 Zane Grey Loop Zane Grey Loop 1,000. 78.00 91.00 TBD 86.00 Deer Creek Ranch Loo30 Zane Grey Loop CR 13 1,270. 78.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 John Wayne Circle 10 Zane Grey Loop End 930. 73.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 Tom Mix Circle 10 Zane Grey Loop End 665. 96.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 Zane Grey Loop 10 Deer Creek Ranch Tom Mix Cir 2,975. 82.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 Zane Grey Loop 20 Tom Mix Cir John Wayne Cir 640. 82.00 60.00 TBD 55.00 Zane Grey Loop 30 John Wayne Cir Deer Creek Ranch 2,590. 82.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 OVERALL 11,115. 81.00 82.63 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- DEER CREEK ESTATES ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: DEER CREEK FARM INSPECTION DATE: 4/11/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Apple Field Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 540. 86.00 51.00 Country Rose Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 790. 71.00 66.00 Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 670. 29.00 45.00 Deer Creek Drive 10 Singing Hills Rd Deer Ridge Cir 325. 72.00 74.00 Deer Creek Drive 100 Country Rose Cir Golden Field Cir 640. 72.00 57.00 Deer Creek Drive 110 Golden Field Cir Apple Field Cir 665. 72.00 46.00 Deer Creek Drive 120 Apple Field Cir OVERALL+B6:B46 675. 72.00 52.00 Deer Creek Drive 130 Fairfield Cir Cir 525. 72.00 65.00 Deer Creek Drive 140 Cir Deer Creek Cir 380. 72.00 73.00 Deer Creek Drive 150 Deer Creek Cir Pine Meadow Ave 620. 72.00 66.00 Deer Creek Drive 160 Pine Meadow Ave Singing Hills Rd 780. 72.00 54.00 Deer Creek Drive 20 Deer Ridge Cir Round Hill Cir 980. 72.00 70.00 Deer Creek Drive 30 Round Hill Cir Red Maple Cir 510. 72.00 86.00 Deer Creek Drive 40 Red Maple Cir Pleasant Hill Cir 425. 72.00 68.00 Deer Creek Drive 50 Pleasant Hill Cir Sunny Farm Cir 445. 72.00 60.00 Deer Creek Drive 60 Sunny Farm Cir Farmhouse Cir 1,295. 72.00 67.00 Deer Creek Drive 70 Farmhouse Cir CR 13 365. 72.00 75.00 Deer Creek Drive 80 CR 13 N Pinefield Cir 380. 72.00 58.00 Deer Creek Drive 90 N Pinefield Cir Country Rose Cir 950. 72.00 35.00 Deer Ridge Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 300. 40.00 36.00 Deer Creek Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 175. 40.00 40.00 Fairfield Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 535. 73.00 58.00 Farmhouse Circle 10 End Deer Creek Dr 500. 75.00 69.00 Farmhouse Circle 20 Deer Creek Dr. End 1,059. 75.00 76.00 Fawn Ridge Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 240. 72.00 67.00 Golden Field Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 535. 72.00 53.00 Meadowlark Court 10 End Pine Meadow Ave 140. 51.00 44.00 Meadowlark Court 20 Pine Meadow Ave End 1,140. 51.00 36.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 10 End Deer Creek Dr 140. 50.00 49.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 20 Deer Creek Dr Pine Meadow Cir 2,065. 50.00 56.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 30 Pine Meadow Cir Meadowlark Ct 580. 50.00 54.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 40 Meadowlark Ct End 360. 50.00 83.00 Pine Meadow Circle 10 Pine Meadow Cir End 165. 50.00 47.00 S Pinefield Circle 10 End Quail Ridge Cir 505. 75.00 79.00 S Pinefield Circle 20 Quail Ridge Cir Deer Creek Dr 430. 75.00 66.00 S Pinefield Circle 30 Deer Creek Dr End 1,090. 75.00 71.00 Pleasant Hill Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 880. 79.00 77.00 Quail Ridge Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 680. 76.00 81.00 Red Maple Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 740. 74.00 75.00 Round Hill Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 1,540. 84.00 82.00 Sunny Farm Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 150. 79.00 87.00 OVERALL 68.00 62.29 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐ 86, 2.55% SATISFACTORY 85‐ 71, 30.58% FAIR 70‐56, 38.09% POOR 55‐41, 18.87% VERY POOR 40‐26, 9.90% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 11% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 50% FAIR 56‐70 25% VERY POOR 26‐40 11% SERIOUS 11‐25 3% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 54 83 36 44 54 47 56 49 66 40 73 45 65 58 52 51 46 53 57 66 35 71 81 79 66 58 75 69 76 67 87 60 77 68 75 86 82 70 74 67 36 FAWN RIDGE PLESANT HILL COUNTRY ROSE DEER CREEK CIR ROUND HILL APPLE FLD GLDN FLD FARMHOUSE SUNNY FARM RED MAPLE DEER CREEK DEER RIDGE PINE MDW DEER CREEK PINE MDW FAIRFLELD PINE MDW C DEER CREEK MEADOWLARK DEER CREEK PINEFIELD QUAIL RIDGE DEER CREEK FARM SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: DEER CREEK FARM INSPECTION DATE: 4/11/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Sunny Farm Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 150. 79.00 87.00 2019 CR, ED $63.60 82.00 Deer Creek Drive 30 Round Hill Cir Red Maple Cir 510. 72.00 86.00 2019 CR, ED $216.24 81.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 40 Meadowlark Ct End 360. 50.00 83.00 2019 CR, ED $152.64 78.00 Round Hill Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 1,540. 84.00 82.00 2019 CR, ED $652.96 77.00 Quail Ridge Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 680. 76.00 81.00 2019 CR, ED $288.32 76.00 S Pinefield Circle 10 End Quail Ridge Cir 505. 75.00 79.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $3,390.23 81.00 Pleasant Hill Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 880. 79.00 77.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $5,740.53 81.00 Farmhouse Circle 20 Deer Creek Dr. End 1,059. 75.00 76.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $6,908.21 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 70 Farmhouse Cir CR 13 365. 72.00 75.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $2,381.02 81.00 Rehab Key Red Maple Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 740. 74.00 75.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $4,827.27 81.00 Code Description Deer Creek Drive 10 Singing Hills Rd Deer Ridge Cir 325. 72.00 74.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $2,120.08 81.00 CR Crack seal Deer Creek Drive 140 Cir Deer Creek Cir 380. 72.00 73.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $2,478.87 81.00 ED Edge Repair S Pinefield Circle 30 Deer Creek Dr End 1,090. 75.00 71.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $7,110.43 81.00 RJ Rejuvinator Deer Creek Drive 20 Deer Ridge Cir Round Hill Cir 980. 72.00 70.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $6,392.87 81.00 SS Slurry Seal Farmhouse Circle 10 End Deer Creek Dr 500. 75.00 69.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $3,261.67 81.00 CS Chip Seal Deer Creek Drive 40 Red Maple Cir Pleasant Hill Cir 425. 72.00 68.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $2,772.42 81.00 OV Overlay depth) Deer Creek Drive 60 Sunny Farm Cir Farmhouse Cir 1,295. 72.00 67.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $8,447.72 81.00 MO Mill & Overlay depth) Fawn Ridge Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 240. 72.00 67.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $1,565.60 81.00 RS Reconstruction Country Rose Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 790. 71.00 66.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $5,153.43 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 150 Deer Creek Cir Pine Meadow Ave 620. 72.00 66.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $4,044.47 81.00 S Pinefield Circle 20 Quail Ridge Cir Deer Creek Dr 430. 75.00 66.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $2,805.03 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 130 Fairfield Cir Cir 525. 72.00 65.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $3,424.75 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 50 Pleasant Hill Cir Sunny Farm Cir 445. 72.00 60.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $3,176.11 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 80 CR 13 N Pinefield Cir 380. 72.00 58.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $2,712.19 81.00 Fairfield Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 535. 73.00 58.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $3,818.47 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 100 Country Rose Cir Golden Field Cir 640. 72.00 57.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $4,567.89 81.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 20 Deer Creek Dr Pine Meadow Cir 2,065. 50.00 56.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $14,738.59 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 160 Pine Meadow Ave Singing Hills Rd 780. 72.00 54.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $5,567.12 81.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 30 Pine Meadow Cir Meadowlark Ct 580. 50.00 54.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $4,139.65 81.00 Golden Field Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 535. 72.00 53.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $3,818.47 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 120 Apple Field Cir OVERALL+B6:B46 675. 72.00 52.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $4,817.70 81.00 Apple Field Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 540. 86.00 51.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $3,854.16 81.00 Pine Meadow Avenue 10 End Deer Creek Dr 140. 50.00 49.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $999.23 81.00 Pine Meadow Circle 10 Pine Meadow Cir End 165. 50.00 47.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $1,177.66 81.00 Deer Creek Drive 110 Golden Field Cir Apple Field Cir 665. 72.00 46.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $4,746.33 81.00 Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 670. 29.00 45.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $4,782.01 81.00 Meadowlark Court 10 End Pine Meadow Ave 140. 51.00 44.00 2019 CR, ED, SS $999.23 81.00 Deer Creek Circle 10 S Pinefield Dr End 175. 40.00 40.00 2019 OV $5,132.17 86.00 Deer Ridge Circle 10 Deer Creek Dr End 300. 40.00 36.00 2019 OV $8,798.00 86.00 Meadowlark Court 20 Pine Meadow Ave End 1,140. 51.00 36.00 2019 OV $33,432.40 86.00 Deer Creek Drive 90 N Pinefield Cir Country Rose Cir 950. 72.00 35.00 2019 OV $27,860.33 86.00 OVERALL 25,909. 68.00 62.29 $213,336.07 90.00 ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS ---PAGE BREAK--- DEER CREEK FARM ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: ELKHORN RANCH INSPECTION DATE: 4/5/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Antelope Ridge Trail 10 Elkhorn Ranch St Northout St 500. 90.00 82.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 100 Paintbrush Ln Coal Creek St 2,855. 90.00 80.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 20 Northout St Elkhorn Ranch St 5,225. 90.00 82.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 30 Elkhorn Ranch St Sagebrush St 1,835. 90.00 75.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 40 Sagebrush St Elkhorn Ranch St 2,285. 90.00 90.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 50 Elkhorn Ranch St Coal Creek St 1,160. 90.00 87.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 60 Coal Creek St Paintbrush Ln 1,385. 90.00 80.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 70 Paintbrush Ln Eastout Ave 8,055. 90.00 85.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 80 Eastout Ave Sagebrush Ave 1,260. 90.00 85.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 90 Sagebrush Ave Paintbrush Ln 1,530. 90.00 85.00 Coal Creek Street 10 CR 194 Antelope Ridge Tr 1,925. 95.00 83.00 Coal Creek Street 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Antelope Ridge Tr 705. 95.00 86.00 Eastout Ave 10 Antelope Ridge Tr Sagebrush Ave 2,560. 93.00 92.00 Eastout Ave 20 Sagebrush Ave CR 17 665. 93.00 83.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 50 Elkhorn St Sagebrush St 1,245. 87.00 76.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 60 Sagebrush St Antelope Ridge Tr 3,070. 87.00 78.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 10 End Antelope Ridge Tr 975. 87.00 76.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Sagebrush St 825. 87.00 82.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 30 Sagebrush St Antelope Ridge Tr 2,050. 87.00 85.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 40 Antelope Ridge Tr Elkhorn St 3,950. 87.00 78.00 Elkhorn Street 10 Elkhorn Ranch St Sagebrush St 2,715. 81.00 79.00 Elkhorn Street 20 Sagebrush St Westout Ave 1,710. 81.00 83.00 Elkhorn Street 30 Westout Ave CR 186 1,000. 81.00 75.00 Northout Sreet 10 CR 194 Antelope Ridge Tr 675. 86.00 85.00 Paintbrush Lane 10 End Antelope Ridge Tr 810. 91.00 80.00 Paintbrush Lane 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Antelope Ridge Tr 2,930. 91.00 85.00 Sagebrush Avenue 10 Antelope Ridge Tr Eastout Ave 1,980. 91.00 85.00 Sagebrush Street 10 Elkhorn Ranch St Antelope Ridge Tr 2,460. 88.00 82.00 Sagebrush Street 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Elkhorn Ranch St 1,750. 88.00 78.00 Sagebrush Street 30 Elkhorn Ranch St Elkhorn St 2,240. 88.00 84.00 Westout Avenue 10 Elkhorn St CR 9 2,520. 80.00 73.00 OVERALL 88.00 81.90 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 10.35% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 89.65% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 81% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 19% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 80 85 85 92 83 85 85 85 80 80 83 86 87 90 75 73 83 84 79 ELKHORN STREET 78 82 85 82 78 76 78 ELKHORN RANCH 75 ANTELOPE RIDGE 82 82 76 ELKHORN RANCH 85 ELKHORN WESTOUT ANTELOPE RIDGE SAGEBRUSH ST COAL CREEK PAINTBRUSH LANE EASTOUT SAGEBRUSH AVE ANTELOPE RIDGE ELKHORN RANCH ELKHORN RANCH NORTHOUT ELKHORN RANCH SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: ELKHORN RANCH INSPECTION DATE: 4/5/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Antelope Ridge Trail 10 Elkhorn Ranch St Northout St 500. 90.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Antelope Ridge Trail 100 Paintbrush Ln Coal Creek St 2,855. 90.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Code Antelope Ridge Trail 20 Northout St Elkhorn Ranch St 5,225. 90.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 CR Antelope Ridge Trail 30 Elkhorn Ranch St Sagebrush St 1,835. 90.00 75.00 TBD 70.00 ED Antelope Ridge Trail 40 Sagebrush St Elkhorn Ranch St 2,285. 90.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 RJ Antelope Ridge Trail 50 Elkhorn Ranch St Coal Creek St 1,160. 90.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 SS Antelope Ridge Trail 60 Coal Creek St Paintbrush Ln 1,385. 90.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 CS Antelope Ridge Trail 70 Paintbrush Ln Eastout Ave 8,055. 90.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 OV Antelope Ridge Trail 80 Eastout Ave Sagebrush Ave 1,260. 90.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 MO Antelope Ridge Trail 90 Sagebrush Ave Paintbrush Ln 1,530. 90.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 RS Coal Creek Street 10 CR 194 Antelope Ridge Tr 1,925. 95.00 83.00 TBD 78.00 Coal Creek Street 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Antelope Ridge Tr 705. 95.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 Eastout Ave 10 Antelope Ridge Tr Sagebrush Ave 2,560. 93.00 92.00 TBD 87.00 Eastout Ave 20 Sagebrush Ave CR 17 665. 93.00 83.00 TBD 78.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 50 Elkhorn St Sagebrush St 1,245. 87.00 76.00 TBD 71.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 60 Sagebrush St Antelope Ridge Tr 3,070. 87.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 10 End Antelope Ridge Tr 975. 87.00 76.00 TBD 71.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Sagebrush St 825. 87.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 30 Sagebrush St Antelope Ridge Tr 2,050. 87.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 Elkhorn Ranch Street 40 Antelope Ridge Tr Elkhorn St 3,950. 87.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 Elkhorn Street 10 Elkhorn Ranch St Sagebrush St 2,715. 81.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 Elkhorn Street 20 Sagebrush St Westout Ave 1,710. 81.00 83.00 TBD 78.00 Elkhorn Street 30 Westout Ave CR 186 1,000. 81.00 75.00 TBD 70.00 Northout Sreet 10 CR 194 Antelope Ridge Tr 675. 86.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 Paintbrush Lane 10 End Antelope Ridge Tr 810. 91.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Paintbrush Lane 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Antelope Ridge Tr 2,930. 91.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 Sagebrush Avenue 10 Antelope Ridge Tr Eastout Ave 1,980. 91.00 85.00 TBD 80.00 Sagebrush Street 10 Elkhorn Ranch St Antelope Ridge Tr 2,460. 88.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Sagebrush Street 20 Antelope Ridge Tr Elkhorn Ranch St 1,750. 88.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 Sagebrush Street 30 Elkhorn Ranch St Elkhorn St 2,240. 88.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 Westout Avenue 10 Elkhorn St CR 9 2,520. 80.00 73.00 TBD 68.00 OVERALL 64,850. 88.00 81.90 ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: FOXWOOD RANCHES INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Becky Circle 10 Patrick Tr End 2,915. 97.00 74.00 Patrick Trail 10 CO194 Becky Cir 6,890. 94.00 89.00 Patrick Trail 20 Becky Cir CO194 2,950. 94.00 83.00 OVERALL 95.00 85.67 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 54.02% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 45.98% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 87% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 13% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- BECKY PATRICK PATRICK FOXWOOD RANCHES SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: FOXWOOD RANCHES INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Becky Circle 10 Patrick Tr End 2,915. 97.00 74.00 TBD 69.00 Patrick Trail 10 CO194 Becky Cir 6,890. 94.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 Patrick Trail 20 Becky Cir CO194 2,950. 94.00 83.00 TBD 78.00 OVERALL 12,755. 95.00 85.67 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- FOXWOOD ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: MEADOW STATION INSPECTION DATE: 4/11/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Buckskin Court 10 Buckskin Rd End 875. 96.00 72.00 Buckskin Road 10 Delbert Rd Buckskin Ct 985. 97.00 82.00 Buckskin Road 20 Buckskin Ct Delbert Rd 1,650. 97.00 92.00 Carlson Road 10 Meadow Station Cir End 790. 100.00 84.00 London Drive 10 Delbert Rd Meadow Station Cir 4,415. 91.00 89.00 London Drive 20 Meadow Station Cir End 2,295. 91.00 87.00 Meadow Station Circle 10 Meadow Station Rd Carlson Rd 2,745. 93.00 90.00 Meadow Station Circle 20 Carlson Rd Meadow Station Rd 4,120. 93.00 89.00 Meadow Station Circle 30 Meadow Station Rd London Dr 1,450. 93.00 80.00 Meadow Station Road 10 Delbert Rd Meadow Sation Cir 3,765. 92.00 86.00 OVERALL 93.00 85.10 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 82.24% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 17.76% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 100% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 87 LONDON 89 86 90 MEADOW STATION CIR 89 84 80 92 72 82 BUCKSKIN RD LONDON MEADOW STATION CIR MEADOW STATION CIR BUCKSKIN CT CARLSON BUCKSKIN RD MEADOW STATION SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: MEADOW STATION INSPECTION DATE: 4/11/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Buckskin Court 10 Buckskin Rd End 875. 96.00 72.00 TBD 67.00 Buckskin Road 10 Delbert Rd Buckskin Ct 985. 97.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Buckskin Road 20 Buckskin Ct Delbert Rd 1,650. 97.00 92.00 TBD 87.00 Carlson Road 10 Meadow Station Cir End 790. 100.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 London Drive 10 Delbert Rd Meadow Station Cir 4,415. 91.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 London Drive 20 Meadow Station Cir End 2,295. 91.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 Meadow Station Circle 10 Meadow Station Rd Carlson Rd 2,745. 93.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Meadow Station Circle 20 Carlson Rd Meadow Station Rd 4,120. 93.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 Meadow Station Circle 30 Meadow Station Rd London Dr 1,450. 93.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Meadow Station Road 10 Delbert Rd Meadow Sation Cir 3,765. 92.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 OVERALL 23,090. 93.00 85.10 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- MEADOW STATION ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: OVERLAND INSPECTION DATE: 4/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Columbine Ridge Road 10 Columbine Trail Columbine Trail E 625. 75.00 86.00 Columbine Trail 10 CO 86 Columbine Trail W 450. 75.00 90.00 Columbine Trail 20 Columbine Trail E Columbine Ridge Rd 1,050. 75.00 90.00 Columbine Trail 30 Columbine Trail E End 280. 75.00 89.00 Columbine Trail East 10 Columbine Trail W Columbine Trail 320. 71.00 73.00 Columbine Trail East 20 Columbine Trail Columbine Ridge Rd 1,690. 71.00 87.00 Columbine Trail East 30 Columbine Ridge Rd Columbine Trail 1,335. 71.00 87.00 Columbine Trail West 10 Columbine Trail Columbine Trail 2,555. 71.00 82.00 OVERALL 73.00 88.88 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 65.38% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 34.62% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 16% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 50% FAIR 56‐70 17% POOR 41‐55 17% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 90 87 90 86 87 89 82 COLUMBINE TRAIL WEST COLUMBINE TRAIL EAST LUMBINE TRAIL COLUMBINE TRAIL COLUMBINE RIDGE COLUMBINE TRAIL OVERLAND SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: OVERLAND INSPECTION DATE: 4/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Columbine Ridge Road 10 Columbine Trail Columbine Trail E 625. 75.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 Columbine Trail 10 CO 86 Columbine Trail W 450. 75.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Columbine Trail 20 Columbine Trail E Columbine Ridge Rd 1,050. 75.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Columbine Trail 30 Columbine Trail E End 280. 75.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 Columbine Trail East 10 Columbine Trail W Columbine Trail 320. 71.00 73.00 TBD 68.00 Columbine Trail East 20 Columbine Trail Columbine Ridge Rd 1,690. 71.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 Columbine Trail East 30 Columbine Ridge Rd Columbine Trail 1,335. 71.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 Columbine Trail West 10 Columbine Trail Columbine Trail 2,555. 71.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 OVERALL 8,305. 73.00 88.88 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal ---PAGE BREAK--- OVERLAND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: OUTBACK INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Sunset Ave 10 CO 29 Antler Cir 680. 19.00 70.00 Sunset Ave 20 Antler Cir Buckhorn Cir 1,700. 19.00 67.00 Sunset Ave 30 Buckhorn Cir Cactus Cir 405. 19.00 67.00 Sunset Ave 40 Cactus Cir Deerfield Cir 675. 19.00 66.00 Sunset Ave 50 Deerfield Cir Eagle Nest Cir 1,120. 19.00 68.00 Sunset Ave 60 Eagle Nest Cir End 675. 19.00 88.00 OVERALL 19.00 71.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 12.84% FAIR 70‐56, 87.16% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 FAIR 56‐70 33% FAILED 0‐10 67% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- SUNSET SUNSET OUTBACK SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: OUTBACK INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Sunset Ave 60 Eagle Nest Cir End 675. 19.00 88.00 2020 CR, ED 302.40 $ 83.00 Sunset Ave 10 CO 29 Antler Cir 680. 19.00 70.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 4,823.47 $ 82.00 Sunset Ave 50 Deerfield Cir Eagle Nest Cir 1,120. 19.00 68.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 7,944.53 $ 82.00 Sunset Ave 20 Antler Cir Buckhorn Cir 1,700. 19.00 67.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 12,058.67 $ 82.00 Sunset Ave 30 Buckhorn Cir Cactus Cir 405. 19.00 67.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 2,872.80 $ 82.00 Sunset Ave 40 Cactus Cir Deerfield Cir 675. 19.00 66.00 2020 CR, ED, SS 4,788.00 $ 82.00 OVERALL 5,255. 19.00 71.00 32,789.87 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- OUTBACK ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: SOUTHERN HILLS INSPECTION DATE: 4/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Pine Ridge Street 10 CO 132 End 1,325. 68.00 89.00 OVERALL 68.00 89.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 50% POOR 41‐55 50% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITIONS SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 89 PINE RIDGE SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: SOUTHERN HILLS INSPECTION DATE: 4/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Pine Ridge Street 10 CO 132 End 1,325. 68.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 OVERALL 1,325. 68.00 89.00 Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- SOUTHERN HILLS ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: SKY RIM INSPECTION DATE: 4/11/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Conifer Street 10 Nobel Dr End 1,420. 86.00 77.00 Fraiser Fir Circle 10 N Pines Tr End 1,020. 73.00 68.00 Loblolly Pine Circle 10 Nobel Dr End 710. 79.00 75.00 Noble Drive 10 N Pines Tr Loblolly Pine Cir 410. 73.00 70.00 Noble Drive 20 Loblolly Pine Cir End 1,380. 73.00 75.00 North Pines Trail 10 Delbert Rd Fraiser Fir 850. 79.00 49.00 North Pines Trail 20 Fraiser Fir Scotch Pine Cir 920. 79.00 76.00 North Pines Trail 30 Scotch Pine Cir Nobel Dr 2,400. 79.00 74.00 North Pines Trail 40 Nobel Dr Red Cedar Cir 1,060. 79.00 76.00 North Pines Trail 50 Red Cedar Cir Silver Fir St 2,565. 79.00 73.00 North Pines Trail 60 Silver Fir St Sunsetview Way 765. 79.00 77.00 Red Cedar Circle 10 N Pines Tr End 625. 76.00 82.00 Scotch Pine Circle 10 N Pines Tr End 750. 79.00 69.00 Silver Fir Street 10 Nobel Dr N Pines Tr 4,130. 66.00 76.00 OVERALL 78.00 76.90 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 84.06% FAIR 70‐56, 11.47% POOR 55‐41, 4.47% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 14% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 73% FAIR 56‐70 13% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 66 79 80 75 79 80 85 83 81 80 87 77 77 60 86 88 77 75 77 90 INDIAN BRUSH 88 73 76 AMANDA PINES NEEDLE LEAF BRISTLE CONE AMANDA PINES ROLLING HILLS SUNSETVIEW SILVER FIR BLACK SPRUCE AMANDA PINES SUGAR PINE SUNSETVIEW ANDREA NORTH PINES INDIAN BRUSH SKYRIM SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: SKY RIM INSPECTION DATE: 4/11/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Red Cedar Circle 10 N Pines Tr End 625. 76.00 82.00 2022 CR,ED 287.50 $ 77.00 Conifer Street 10 Nobel Dr End 1,420. 86.00 77.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 10,342.33 $ 84.00 North Pines Trail 60 Silver Fir St Sunsetview Way 765. 79.00 77.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 3,460.35 $ 84.00 North Pines Trail 20 Fraiser Fir Scotch Pine Cir 920. 79.00 76.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 28,848.13 $ 84.00 North Pines Trail 40 Nobel Dr Red Cedar Cir 1,060. 79.00 76.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 731.40 $ 84.00 Silver Fir Street 10 Nobel Dr N Pines Tr 4,130. 66.00 76.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 2,849.70 $ 84.00 Loblolly Pine Circle 10 Nobel Dr End 710. 79.00 75.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 489.90 $ 84.00 Noble Drive 20 Loblolly Pine Cir End 1,380. 73.00 75.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 952.20 $ 84.00 North Pines Trail 30 Scotch Pine Cir Nobel Dr 2,400. 79.00 74.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 1,656.00 $ 84.00 North Pines Trail 50 Red Cedar Cir Silver Fir St 2,565. 79.00 73.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 1,769.85 $ 84.00 Noble Drive 10 N Pines Tr Loblolly Pine Cir 410. 73.00 70.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 282.90 $ 84.00 Scotch Pine Circle 10 N Pines Tr End 750. 79.00 69.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 517.50 $ 84.00 Fraiser Fir Circle 10 N Pines Tr End 1,020. 73.00 68.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 703.80 $ 84.00 North Pines Trail 10 Delbert Rd Fraiser Fir 850. 79.00 49.00 2022 CR, ED, SS 977.50 $ 84.00 OVERALL 19,005. 78.00 76.90 53,869.07 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: STAGE RUN INSPECTION DATE: 4/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Arabian Trail 10 Wagon Wheel Tr End 1,050. 50.00 42.00 Broken Arrow Circle 10 Wagon Wheel Tr End 180. 22.00 31.00 Cherokee Trail 10 End Wagon Wheel Tr 2,910. 30.00 62.00 Cherokee Trail 20 Wagon Wheel Tr Rawhide Cir 2,030. 30.00 49.00 Cherokee Trail 30 Rawhide Cir Wagon Train Cir 1,040. 30.00 36.00 Cherokee Trail 40 Wagon Train Cir Stagecoach Cir 550. 30.00 47.00 Cherokee Trail 50 Stagecoach Cir CR 86 825. 30.00 44.00 Rawhide Circle 10 End Wagon Wheel Tr 635. 53.00 35.00 Rawhide Circle 20 Wagon Wheel Tr Cherokee Trail 1,610. 53.00 59.00 Stagecoach Circle 10 Cherokee Trail End 570. 49.00 40.00 Stampede Circle 10 Wagon Wheel Tr End 1,585. 75.00 57.00 Wagon Train Circle 10 Cherokee Trail End 740. 70.00 37.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 10 End Arabian Trail 960. 64.00 39.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 20 Arabian Trail Stampede Cir 1,150. 64.00 60.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 30 Stampede Cir Cherokee Trail 625. 64.00 72.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 40 Cherokee Trail Broken Arrow Cir 3,190. 64.00 42.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 50 Broken Arrow Cir Rawhide Cir 1,110. 64.00 42.00 OVERALL 48.00 46.71 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 85‐ 71, 3.01% FAIR 70‐56, 34.95% POOR 55‐41, 42.17% VERY POOR 40‐26, 19.87% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 17% FAIR 56‐70 22% POOR 41‐55 22% VERY POOR 26‐40 22% SERIOUS 11‐25 11% FAILED 0‐10 6% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 44 40 47 37 36 49 59 35 RAWHIDE 42 31 42 62 72 57 60 39 42 STAGECOACH WAGON TRAIN RAWHIDE STAMPEDE CHEROKEE TR WAGON WHEEL BROKEN ARROW ARABIAN WAGON WHEEL STAGE RUN SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: STAGE RUN INSPECTION DATE: 4/14/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Wagon Wheel Trail 30 Stampede Cir Cherokee Trail 625. 64.00 72.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 4,077.08 $ 80.00 Cherokee Trail 10 End Wagon Wheel Tr 2,910. 30.00 62.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 18,982.90 $ 80.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 20 Arabian Trail Stampede Cir 1,150. 64.00 60.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 7,975.63 $ 80.00 Rawhide Circle 20 Wagon Wheel Tr Cherokee Trail 1,610. 53.00 59.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 11,165.89 $ 80.00 Stampede Circle 10 Wagon Wheel Tr End 1,585. 75.00 57.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 10,992.50 $ 80.00 Cherokee Trail 20 Wagon Wheel Tr Rawhide Cir 2,030. 30.00 49.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 14,078.73 $ 80.00 Cherokee Trail 40 Wagon Train Cir Stagecoach Cir 550. 30.00 47.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 3,814.43 $ 80.00 Cherokee Trail 50 Stagecoach Cir CR 86 825. 30.00 44.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 5,721.65 $ 80.00 Arabian Trail 10 Wagon Wheel Tr End 1,050. 50.00 42.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 7,282.10 $ 80.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 40 Cherokee Trail Broken Arrow Cir 3,190. 64.00 42.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 22,123.71 $ 80.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 50 Broken Arrow Cir Rawhide Cir 1,110. 64.00 42.00 2018 CR, ED, SS 7,698.22 $ 80.00 Stagecoach Circle 10 Cherokee Trail End 570. 49.00 40.00 2018 CR, ED, OV 16,243.10 $ 85.00 Wagon Wheel Trail 10 End Arabian Trail 960. 64.00 39.00 2018 CR, ED, OV 27,356.80 $ 85.00 Wagon Train Circle 10 Cherokee Trail End 740. 70.00 37.00 2018 CR, ED, OV 21,087.53 $ 85.00 Cherokee Trail 30 Rawhide Cir Wagon Train Cir 1,040. 30.00 36.00 2018 CR, ED, OV 29,636.53 $ 85.00 Rawhide Circle 10 End Wagon Wheel Tr 635. 53.00 35.00 2018 CR, ED, OV 18,095.38 $ 85.00 Broken Arrow Circle 10 Wagon Wheel Tr End 180. 22.00 31.00 2018 CR, ED, OV 5,129.40 $ 85.00 OVERALL 20,760. 48.00 46.71 231,461.60 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS Reconstruction Description Rehab Key ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) ---PAGE BREAK--- STAGE RUN ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: SPRING VALLEY RANCH INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Annadale Trail 10 S Augusta Ave Westchester Dr 445. 100.00 n/a Annadale Trail 20 Westchester Dr Big Horn Cir 580. 100.00 91.00 Annadale Trail 30 Big Horn Cir End 325. 100.00 95.00 Bear Creek Loop 10 Annadale Tr Southwind Cir 1,130. 92.00 n/a Bear Creek Loop 20 Southwind Cir Annadale Tr 380. 92.00 95.00 Big Horn Circle 10 Annadale Trail End 245. n/a 87.00 E Kingsmill Circle 10 End Las Colinas Dr 340. 89.00 86.00 E Kingsmill Circle 20 Las Colinas Dr La Quinta Cir 1,310. 89.00 82.00 E Kingsmill Circle 30 La Quinta Cir La Costa Cir 350. 89.00 82.00 E Kingsmill Circle 40 La Costa Cir E Kingsmill Cir 715. 89.00 80.00 E Murifield Loop 10 S Augusta Ave S Augusta Ave 2,670. 85.00 76.00 Forest Oaks Drive 10 S Augusta Ave Harbor Town Dr 255. 91.00 93.00 Forest Oaks Drive 20 Harbor Town Dr Indian Wells Cir 590. 91.00 81.00 Forest Oaks Drive 30 Indian Wells Cir Harbor Town Dr 1,020. 91.00 86.00 Forest Oaks Drive 40 Harbor Town Dr S Augusta Ave 210. 91.00 93.00 Harbor Town Drive 10 Forest Oaks Dr Innisbrook Loop 125. 94.00 82.00 Harbor Town Drive 20 Innisbrook Loop Innisbrook Loop 740. 94.00 82.00 Harbor Town Drive 30 Innisbrook Loop Forest Oaks Dr 765. 94.00 89.00 Indian Wells Circle 10 Forest Oaks Dr End 365. n/a 84.00 Innisbrook Loop 10 Harbor Town Dr Harbor Town Dr 1,040. n/a 90.00 La Costa Circle 10 E Kingsmill Cir End 415. 91.00 86.00 La Quinta Circle 10 E Kingsmill Cir End 220. 93.00 90.00 Las Colinas Drive 10 S Augusta Ave Laurel Valley Cir 310. 90.00 80.00 Las Colinas Drive 20 Laurel Valley Cir Las Colinas Dr 590. 90.00 86.00 Laurel Valley Circle 10 Las Colinas Dr End 300. 94.00 90.00 N Pinehurst Circle 10 End Oakwood St 560. 94.00 73.00 Oakwood Street 40 Pleasant Valley Cir S Augusta Ave 750. 83.00 78.00 Oakwood Street 10 Spring Valley Ranc N Pinehurst Cir 315. 83.00 80.00 Oakwood Street 20 N Pinehurst Cir Plantation Cir 420. 83.00 80.00 Oakwood Street 30 Plantation Cir Pleasant Valley Cir 540. 83.00 83.00 Plantation Circle 10 Oakwood St End 830. 97.00 71.00 Pleasant Valley Circle 10 Oakwood St End 855. 77.00 78.00 S Augusta Avenue 50 E Muirfield Loop E Kingsmill Cir 635. 78.00 82.00 S Augusta Avenue 60 E Kingsmill Cir Forest Oaks Dr 870. 78.00 84.00 S Augusta Avenue 70 Forest Oaks Dr Annadale Tr 535. 78.00 84.00 S Augusta Avenue 80 Annadale Tr Forest Oaks Dr 1,600. 78.00 79.00 S Augusta Avenue 90 Forest Oaks Dr End 130. 78.00 n/a S Augusta Avenue 10 Spring Valley Ranc Oakwood St 1,000. 78.00 83.00 S Augusta Avenue 20 Oakwood St E Muirfield Loop 2,030. 78.00 84.00 S Augusta Avenue 30 E Muirfield Loop Las Colinas Dr 280. 78.00 83.00 S Augusta Avenue 40 Las Colinas Dr E Muirfield Loop 280. 78.00 83.00 S Pinehurst Circle 10 Oakwood St End 420. 81.00 88.00 Southwind Circle 10 Bear Creek Loop End 205. n/a 89.00 Spring Valley Ranch R10 End Oakwood St 3,195. 82.00 n/a Spring Valley Ranch R20 Oakwood St S Augusta Ave 1,825. 82.00 n/a Spring Valley Ranch R30 S Augusta Ave CO 166 5,710. 82.00 n/a Westchester Drive 10 Annadale Tr End 225. 100.00 93.00 OVERALL 86.00 86.77 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 51.68% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 48.32% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 50% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 50% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 83 80 73 88 80 71 83 78 78 76 84 83 83 80 90 86 86 82 90 82 86 80 84 BIG HORN 100 89 95 95 87 91 93 100 84 79 100 93 86 84 93 81 89 82 90 82 LAS COLINAS MURIFIELD ANNADALE BEAR CREEK SOUTHWIND INDN WELLS FRST OAKS HRBR TOWN INNISBROOK AUGUSTA LA COSTA KINGSMILL LA QUINTA KINGSMILL LAUREL VALLEY N PLANTATION S OAKWOOD AUGUSTA PLEASANT VALLEY AUGUSTA SPRING VALLEY RANCH SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: SPRING VALLEY RANCH INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Annadale Trail 10 S Augusta Ave Westchester Dr 445. 100.00 n/a TBD Annadale Trail 20 Westchester Dr Big Horn Cir 580. 100.00 91.00 TBD 86.00 Code Annadale Trail 30 Big Horn Cir End 325. 100.00 95.00 TBD 90.00 CR Bear Creek Loop 10 Annadale Tr Southwind Cir 1,130. 92.00 n/a TBD ED Bear Creek Loop 20 Southwind Cir Annadale Tr 380. 92.00 95.00 TBD 90.00 RJ Big Horn Circle 10 Annadale Trail End 245. n/a 87.00 TBD 82.00 SS E Kingsmill Circle 10 End Las Colinas Dr 340. 89.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 CS E Kingsmill Circle 20 Las Colinas Dr La Quinta Cir 1,310. 89.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 OV E Kingsmill Circle 30 La Quinta Cir La Costa Cir 350. 89.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 MO E Kingsmill Circle 40 La Costa Cir E Kingsmill Cir 715. 89.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 RS E Murifield Loop 10 S Augusta Ave S Augusta Ave 2,670. 85.00 76.00 TBD 71.00 Forest Oaks Drive 10 S Augusta Ave Harbor Town Dr 255. 91.00 93.00 TBD 88.00 Forest Oaks Drive 20 Harbor Town Dr Indian Wells Cir 590. 91.00 81.00 TBD 76.00 Forest Oaks Drive 30 Indian Wells Cir Harbor Town Dr 1,020. 91.00 86.00 TBD 81.00 Forest Oaks Drive 40 Harbor Town Dr S Augusta Ave 210. 91.00 93.00 TBD 88.00 Harbor Town Drive 10 Forest Oaks Dr Innisbrook Loop 125. 94.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Harbor Town Drive 20 Innisbrook Loop Innisbrook Loop 740. 94.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Harbor Town Drive 30 Innisbrook Loop Forest Oaks Dr 765. 94.00 89.00 TBD 84 Indian Wells Circle 10 Forest Oaks Dr End 365. n/a 84.00 TBD 79 Innisbrook Loop 10 Harbor Town Dr Harbor Town Dr 1,040. n/a 90.00 TBD 85 La Costa Circle 10 E Kingsmill Cir End 415. 91.00 86.00 TBD 81 La Quinta Circle 10 E Kingsmill Cir End 220. 93.00 90.00 TBD 85 Las Colinas Drive 10 S Augusta Ave Laurel Valley Cir 310. 90.00 80.00 TBD 75 Las Colinas Drive 20 Laurel Valley Cir Las Colinas Dr 590. 90.00 86.00 TBD 81 Laurel Valley Circle 10 Las Colinas Dr End 300. 94.00 90.00 TBD 85 N Pinehurst Circle 10 End Oakwood St 560. 94.00 73.00 TBD 68 Oakwood Street 40 Pleasant Valley Cir S Augusta Ave 750. 83.00 78.00 TBD 73 Oakwood Street 10 Spring Valley Ranc N Pinehurst Cir 315. 83.00 80.00 TBD 75 Oakwood Street 20 N Pinehurst Cir Plantation Cir 420. 83.00 80.00 TBD 75 Oakwood Street 30 Plantation Cir Pleasant Valley Cir 540. 83.00 83.00 TBD 78 Plantation Circle 10 Oakwood St End 830. 97.00 71.00 TBD 66 Pleasant Valley Circle 10 Oakwood St End 855. 77.00 78.00 TBD 73 S Augusta Avenue 50 E Muirfield Loop E Kingsmill Cir 635. 78.00 82.00 TBD 77 S Augusta Avenue 60 E Kingsmill Cir Forest Oaks Dr 870. 78.00 84.00 TBD 79 S Augusta Avenue 70 Forest Oaks Dr Annadale Tr 535. 78.00 84.00 TBD 79 S Augusta Avenue 80 Annadale Tr Forest Oaks Dr 1,600. 78.00 79.00 TBD 74 S Augusta Avenue 90 Forest Oaks Dr End 130. 78.00 n/a TBD S Augusta Avenue 10 Spring Valley Ranc Oakwood St 1,000. 78.00 83.00 TBD 78 S Augusta Avenue 20 Oakwood St E Muirfield Loop 2,030. 78.00 84.00 TBD 79 S Augusta Avenue 30 E Muirfield Loop Las Colinas Dr 280. 78.00 83.00 TBD 78 S Augusta Avenue 40 Las Colinas Dr E Muirfield Loop 280. 78.00 83.00 TBD 78 S Pinehurst Circle 10 Oakwood St End 420. 81.00 88.00 TBD 83 Southwind Circle 10 Bear Creek Loop End 205. n/a 89.00 TBD 84 Spring Valley Ranch R10 End Oakwood St 3,195. 82.00 n/a TBD Spring Valley Ranch R20 Oakwood St S Augusta Ave 1,825. 82.00 n/a TBD Spring Valley Ranch R30 S Augusta Ave CO 166 5,710. 82.00 n/a TBD Westchester Drive 10 Annadale Tr End 225. 100.00 93.00 TBD 88 OVERALL 38,645. 86.00 86.77 ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- SPRING VALLEY ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: TNM RANCHES INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Taos Trail 10 CO 29 CO 174 2,830. 74.00 72.00 OVERALL 74.00 72.00 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY SATISFACTORY 85‐ 71, 100.00% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 50% FAIR 56‐70 50% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 72 TAOS TNM RANCHES SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: TNM RANCHES INSPECTION DATE: 4/12/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST 2023 PROJ. PCI Taos Trail 10 CO 29 CO 174 2,830. 74.00 72.00 2021 CR, ED, SS 19,440.21 $ 83.00 OVERALL 2,830. 74.00 72.00 19,440.21 $ Code CR ED RJ SS CS OV MO RS ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- TNM RANCHES ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: WILD POINTE INSPECTION DATE: 4/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI Badger Ridge Circle 10 Heritage Trail End 630. 87.00 89.00 Chaparral Circle 10 Legacy Ridge St End 1,900. 92.00 80.00 Greystone Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 1,360. 85.00 79.00 Heritage Ridge Trail 10 Legacy Ridge St End 725. n/a 85.00 Heritage Trail 10 Legacy Ridge St Badger Ridge Cir 1,380. 93.00 84.00 Heritage Trail 20 Badger Ridge Cir End 2,550. 93.00 79.00 Legacy Circle 10 CO 86(N) Legacy Trail 2,595. 86.00 n/a Legacy Circle 20 Legacy Trail CO 86(S) 1,285. 86.00 n/a Legacy Ridge Street 30 Chaparral Cir Promontory Cir 2,545. 90.00 76.00 Legacy Ridge Street 40 Promontory Cir Willow Run Cir 1,065. 90.00 60.00 Legacy Ridge Street 50 Willow Run Cir Heritage Tr 970. 90.00 88.00 Legacy Ridge Street 60 Heritage Tr Heritage Tr 1,100. 90.00 83.00 Legacy Ridge Street 10 CO 86 Legacy Trail 4,495. 90.00 78.00 Legacy Ridge Street 20 Legacy Trail Chaparral Cir 770. 90.00 87.00 Legacy Trail 10 Legacy Cir Wildflower Cir 1,180. 92.00 79.00 Legacy Trail 100 Timarron Cir Star Ridge Cir 380. 92.00 81.00 Legacy Trail 110 Star Ridge Cir Legacy Ridge St 1,885. 92.00 81.00 Legacy Trail 20 Wildflower Cir Ridgeview Loop 540. 92.00 78.00 Legacy Trail 30 Ridgeview Loop Tribute Cir 285. 92.00 76.00 Legacy Trail 40 Tribute Cir Greystone Cir 740. 92.00 82.00 Legacy Trail 50 Greystone Cir Ridgeview Loop 1,505. 92.00 76.00 Legacy Trail 60 Ridgeview Loop Cir 895. 92.00 88.00 Legacy Trail 70 Cir Vista View Cir 770. 92.00 90.00 Legacy Trail 80 Vista View Cir Vantage Cir 1,545. 92.00 90.00 Legacy Trail 90 Vantage Cir Timarron Cir 550. 92.00 88.00 Prominence Circle 10 Ridgeview Loop End 1,105. 78.00 67.00 Promontory Circle 10 Legacy Ridge St End 1,020. 94.00 89.00 Ridgeview Loop 10 Legacy Trail Sheffield Cir 1,510. 81.00 72.00 Ridgeview Loop 20 Sheffield Cir Prominence Cir 1,305. 81.00 67.00 Ridgeview Loop 30 Prominence Cir Legacy Trail 1,265. 81.00 82.00 Sheffield Circle 10 Ridgeview Loop End 590. 94.00 68.00 Star Ridge Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 555. 86.00 82.00 Timarron Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 435. 100.00 82.00 Tribute Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 720. 85.00 67.00 Vantage Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 480. 100.00 90.00 Viewpointe Circle 10 Cir End 400. 100.00 92.00 Vista View Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 780. 97.00 74.00 Wildflower Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 405. 99.00 80.00 Willow Run Circle 10 Legacy Ridge St End 440. n/a 88.00 Circle 10 Legacy Trail Viewpointe Cir 610. 100.00 89.00 Circle 20 Viewpointe Cir End 365. 100.00 93.00 OVERALL 91.00 81.93 ROADWAY ASPHALT CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86, 29.20% SATISFACTORY 85‐71, 60.31% FAIR 70‐56, 10.49% 2017 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 100‐86 SATISFACTORY 85‐71 FAIR 70‐56 POOR 55‐41 VERY POOR 40‐26 SERIOUS 25‐11 FAILED 10‐0 GOOD 86‐100 81% SATISFACTORY 71‐85 19% 2010 ROADWAY CONDITION SUMMARY GOOD 86‐100 SATISFACTORY 71‐85 FAIR 56‐70 POOR 41‐55 VERY POOR 26‐40 SERIOUS 11‐25 FAILED 0‐10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 83 85 LEGACY RDG 79 84 89 88 88 60 89 76 80 78 87 81 82 81 82 88 90 90 74 90 93 92 89 88 76 82 76 82 67 67 68 72 78 79 80 67 79 PROMONTORY HERITAGE TRAIL CHAPARRAL VISTA VIEW SHEFFIELD PROMINENCE HERITAGE RIDGE BADGER RUN WILLOW RUN LEGACY RDG STAR RIDGE LEGACY TRL TIMARRON VANTAGE LEGACY TRL WILDFLOWER RIDGEVIEW LOOP TRIBUTE GREYSTONE VIEWPOINTE LEGACY TRL WILD POINTE SUBDIVISION - 2017 PCI SCALE: N.T.S. GOOD: 100-86 SATISFACTORY: 85-71 FAIR: 70-56 POOR: 55-41 VERY POOR: 40-26 SERIOUS: 25-11 FAILED: 10-0 LEGEND ---PAGE BREAK--- SUBDIVISION: WILD POINTE INSPECTION DATE: 4/13/2017 STREET NAME SECTION FROM TO LENGTH (FT) 2010 PCI 2017 PCI EST. REHAB DATE REHAB REHAB COST REHAB COST Badger Ridge Circle 10 Heritage Trail End 630. 87.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 Chaparral Circle 10 Legacy Ridge St End 1,900. 92.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Greystone Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 1,360. 85.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 Heritage Ridge Trail 10 Legacy Ridge St End 725. n/a 85.00 TBD 80.00 Heritage Trail 10 Legacy Ridge St Badger Ridge Cir 1,380. 93.00 84.00 TBD 79.00 Heritage Trail 20 Badger Ridge Cir End 2,550. 93.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 Code Legacy Circle 10 CO 86(N) Legacy Trail 2,595. 86.00 n/a TBD CR Legacy Circle 20 Legacy Trail CO 86(S) 1,285. 86.00 n/a TBD ED Legacy Ridge Street 30 Chaparral Cir Promontory Cir 2,545. 90.00 76.00 TBD 71.00 RJ Legacy Ridge Street 40 Promontory Cir Willow Run Cir 1,065. 90.00 60.00 TBD 55.00 SS Legacy Ridge Street 50 Willow Run Cir Heritage Tr 970. 90.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 CS Legacy Ridge Street 60 Heritage Tr Heritage Tr 1,100. 90.00 83.00 TBD 78.00 OV Legacy Ridge Street 10 CO 86 Legacy Trail 4,495. 90.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 MO Legacy Ridge Street 20 Legacy Trail Chaparral Cir 770. 90.00 87.00 TBD 82.00 RS Legacy Trail 10 Legacy Cir Wildflower Cir 1,180. 92.00 79.00 TBD 74.00 Legacy Trail 100 Timarron Cir Star Ridge Cir 380. 92.00 81.00 TBD 76.00 Legacy Trail 110 Star Ridge Cir Legacy Ridge St 1,885. 92.00 81.00 TBD 76.00 Legacy Trail 20 Wildflower Cir Ridgeview Loop 540. 92.00 78.00 TBD 73.00 Legacy Trail 30 Ridgeview Loop Tribute Cir 285. 92.00 76.00 TBD 71.00 Legacy Trail 40 Tribute Cir Greystone Cir 740. 92.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Legacy Trail 50 Greystone Cir Ridgeview Loop 1,505. 92.00 76.00 TBD 71.00 Legacy Trail 60 Ridgeview Loop Cir 895. 92.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 Legacy Trail 70 Cir Vista View Cir 770. 92.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Legacy Trail 80 Vista View Cir Vantage Cir 1,545. 92.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Legacy Trail 90 Vantage Cir Timarron Cir 550. 92.00 88.00 TBD 83.00 Prominence Circle 10 Ridgeview Loop End 1,105. 78.00 67.00 TBD 62.00 Promontory Circle 10 Legacy Ridge St End 1,020. 94.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 Ridgeview Loop 10 Legacy Trail Sheffield Cir 1,510. 81.00 72.00 TBD 67.00 Ridgeview Loop 20 Sheffield Cir Prominence Cir 1,305. 81.00 67.00 TBD 62.00 Ridgeview Loop 30 Prominence Cir Legacy Trail 1,265. 81.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Sheffield Circle 10 Ridgeview Loop End 590. 94.00 68.00 TBD 63.00 Star Ridge Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 555. 86.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Timarron Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 435. 100.00 82.00 TBD 77.00 Tribute Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 720. 85.00 67.00 TBD 62.00 Vantage Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 480. 100.00 90.00 TBD 85.00 Viewpointe Circle 10 Cir End 400. 100.00 92.00 TBD 87.00 Vista View Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 780. 97.00 74.00 TBD 69.00 Wildflower Circle 10 Legacy Trail End 405. 99.00 80.00 TBD 75.00 Willow Run Circle 10 Legacy Ridge St End 440. n/a 88.00 TBD 83.00 Circle 10 Legacy Trail Viewpointe Cir 610. 100.00 89.00 TBD 84.00 Circle 20 Viewpointe Cir End 365. 100.00 93.00 TBD 88.00 OVERALL 45,630. 91.00 81.93 ROADWAY REHABILITATION COST ANALYSIS Rehab Key Description Crack seal Edge Repair Rejuvinator Slurry Seal Chip Seal Overlay depth) Mill & Overlay depth) Reconstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- WILD POINTE

Document Elbertcounty-Co_doc_d22274d25c

Full Text