Full Text
Request for Proposal: Structural and Construction Design Services for Site Preparation at 112 N. 2nd Street, Douglas, Wyoming *REISSUED* The City is seeking proposals from qualified firms for geotechnical, structural and construction design services for a former 5,500-square-foot building located at 112 N 2nd Street in downtown Douglas. The project includes engineering analysis and the development of a detailed site- specific geotechnical report, structural and construction drawings necessary to stabilize the site and adjacent buildings, prepare the site for interim use, and guide future redevelopment efforts. This RFP focuses on planning and design, providing the groundwork for future construction activities. RFPs will be accepted electronically until 4:00 PM MT, November 20, 2024, and will be evaluated immediately following. Please send your PDF response to: Clara Chaffin [EMAIL REDACTED] Subject: “112 N 2nd Structural and Construction Design Services” ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 2 of 9 Section One Introduction and Summary The City of Douglas is soliciting proposals from qualified Wyoming-licensed engineers for structural and geotechnical design services at 112 N. 2nd Street in downtown Douglas. Damaged by a fire in 2000, this property is an important part of the City’s downtown revitalization efforts, with a long-term vision to redevelop the site. The focus of this RFP is on conducting the necessary geotechnical and structural analysis and developing detailed construction drawings to stabilize the site, secure adjacent buildings, and prepare the property for interim uses. This effort will provide the critical groundwork for the City’s future construction and redevelopment phases. Proposals must be submitted electronically to Clara Chaffin at [EMAIL REDACTED] with the subject line “RESPONSE TO RFP: Structural and Construction Design Services for Site Preparation at 112 N. 2nd St” by no later than 4:00 PM MST, November 20, 2024. The City anticipates awarding the project at the City Council’s regular meeting on December 9, 2024, with work expected to begin by December 23, 2024, following contract execution. All work should be completed by May 2025 unless otherwise approved by City Council. Section Two City of Douglas Recognized as the Jackalope Capital of the world, the City of Douglas, with a population of over 6,400 people, is a growing community located in east-central Wyoming, in Converse County. The City is situated along the Interstate 25 corridor, approximately 50 miles east of Casper, WY, and 130 miles north of Cheyenne, WY. Our legacy is rooted in Oregon Trail pioneers, railroads, and the wild western frontier. That pioneering spirit, essential to survival in the old West, still exists today. With breathtaking views, Douglas sits at an elevation of 5,000 feet, resting at the foot of the beautiful Laramie Mountain range and beside the North Platte River. The nearby Medicine Bow National Forest and Glendo Reservoir provide opportunities for outdoor recreation such as hunting, fishing, boating, and hiking. In addition to being the official home of the Jackalope and a Tree City USA, ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 3 of 9 Douglas is home to the Wyoming State Fairgrounds, Pioneer Museum, Wyoming Law Enforcement Academy, Douglas Railroad Interpretive Center, Douglas Community Golf Course, and other attractions. Douglas has been named one of the best 100 Small Towns in America and was recently recognized as the best small town in the western United States to practice medicine. The City enjoys a diverse economy and high quality of life, grounded in traditional family values. The strong economic base is primarily influenced by the availability of rail access, nearby coal resources, and related mining operations, as well as mineral exploration and production activities associated with oil, gas, and uranium reserves in Converse County The current municipal boundaries can be found online via the Converse County Mapserver. Section Three Project Background The downtown property at 112 N. 2nd Street covers approximately 0.14 acres in the heart of Douglas, sitting at an elevation of 4,819 feet. The site has a rich history, dating back to its earliest known use as an ice cream shop, as recorded on a Sanborn Fire Insurance map from 1894. Over the years, it has housed a variety of businesses, including a meat store, billiards, furniture store, confectionery, grocery warehouse, bank, law offices, clothing store, and more. By 1995, the site became home to KKTY Radio and Four Seasons Cleaners, which operated until at least 2001. Although the building was believed to have been erected in 1913, earlier maps show it was in use as early as 1894. The property was severely damaged by fire around 2000, leaving only the front unreinforced masonry façade intact, which has since been supported by temporary timber support structures that are now deteriorating. Extensive assessments have been conducted over the past five years, beginning with Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments under a USEPA Brownfield Grant to determine any lingering contamination from the dry cleaners and fire. In 2024, a limited structural evaluation by Martin and Martin assessed the condition of the remaining façade, temporary timber bracing, and surrounding infrastructure. This assessment is included in the appendices. The current site consists of the façade front, a chain-link fence at the rear, and a vacant interior filled with vegetation, concrete remnants, and the deteriorating façade and ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 4 of 9 support systems. These elements are now compromised, posing a potential threat to the adjacent structures and public spaces. The City has a long-term vision for the property as part of its downtown revitalization efforts, with the ultimate goal of developing a three-story mixed- use building featuring commercial spaces on the ground floor and residential units on the second and third floors. A concept plan for this redevelopment was developed in 2021. However, the immediate focus of this RFP is to stabilize the site and prepare it for interim use. The selected firm will build upon existing studies and assessments to ensure that the site and adjacent structures are structurally secure, in turn laying the groundwork for future construction and redevelopment. Concept plans for the future redevelopment are included as an attachment. Section Four Scope of Services The purpose of this project is to stabilize and prepare the site at 112 N. 2nd Street for interim uses while laying the groundwork for future redevelopment. The selected consultant will be responsible for the following preliminary elements: 1. Structural Stabilization Plan: Develop a detailed structural stabilization plan that ensures the structural integrity of the remaining site components and the protection of adjacent buildings. This includes any structural modeling and design computations needed to produce construction drawings to stabilize the shared walls with neighboring structures and any associated infrastructure (sidewalks, streets, and alleyways). 2. Facade Removal Plan: Provide a comprehensive plan for the safe removal of the existing unreinforced masonry façade without causing damage to the adjacent buildings. This plan must take into account structural concerns, required sequencing, the stability of neighboring properties, and the preservation of site integrity. 3. Site Preparation and Geotechnical Evaluation: Conduct a site-specific geotechnical analysis to determine sub-base fill needs and to provide recommendations to mitigate water infiltration and groundwater issues as they relate to the site and adjacent structures. The geotechnical report shall provide the required structural design criteria values of the conceptual future building’s foundation substructure. The design must account for the site’s future use, preparing it for potential interim activities and future redevelopment. The sub-base fill design must protect adjacent infrastructure, including buildings, sidewalks, streets, and alleyways, and accommodate the structural needs of the conceptual future building. 4. Feasibility Study for Future Redevelopment: Assess the feasibility of future engineering needs based on the City’s conceptual redevelopment plans. The study should identify constraints and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 5 of 9 related to existing infrastructure, structural integrity of the site and existing features, and propose solutions to integrate future development with the site. Deliverables: The City is seeking the following minimum deliverables: • Phase I: Structural Stabilization and Site Preparation Plan o Develop detailed pricing plans with general specification notes for the removal of the front façade. o Create stabilization pricing plans with general specification notes for adjacent buildings and shared walls. o Provide a geotechnical analysis and associated report, along with the structural design for site fill, ensuring protection of adjacent infrastructure and preparing the site for interim use. o Develop construction documents that will guide interim site preparation work. o Assist the City with Bid Documents and selection of a contractor/developer. • Phase II: Feasibility Study for Future Development o Conduct a feasibility study for the site’s engineering based on the conceptual redevelopment plan. o Provide a preliminary cost estimate for the future construction phase, including permits and compliance with local regulations. o Refine the conceptual redevelopment design based on feasibility findings. Project Timeline: Work on the project is anticipated to begin in December 2024, following final selection and contract approval, with an anticipated completion by May 2025 unless otherwise approved by City Council. The selected consultant will provide a detailed project timeline that outlines key milestones and progress checkpoints. Project Management and Communication: The selected consultant will be responsible for regular communication with City staff, including organizing project meetings, preparing meeting materials, and providing timely updates on progress. • Timeline and Budget: a clear project timeline and budget for ongoing communication and project management must be included in the proposal. • Meetings: progress meetings will be held with Staff. These progress meetings may be held virtually. Qualification Requirements: The consultant team must include licensed engineers in Wyoming, experienced in structural, geotechnical, and civil engineering. Proposals should identify the project lead and any additional team members required to complete the work. All professionals must be appropriately licensed in Wyoming. Additional Considerations: Respondents are encouraged to propose an alternate scope of services that meets the goals of the project, including any innovative approaches to site stabilization and future redevelopment planning. All final documentation and reports will be provided electronically. ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 6 of 9 Documentation: At a minimum, provide documentation of all activities, draft reports, and final reports electronically. This is subject to change based on idea-generating conversations between the selected consultant and the City. Delivery: Consultants will ensure that each of the requirements is met, and components are included in the final document. Section Five RFP Submittal Requirements RFPs must include the following information: 1. Introductory Requirements a. Transmittal Letter Provide a transmittal letter signed by an authorized representative of the firm, confirming the applicant’s availability and commitment to completing the project within the specified timeline. b. Project Understanding Include a statement describing the applicant’s understanding of the project’s scope, with emphasis on the stabilization and interim site preparation goals, and any unique skills or approaches the applicant will bring to the project. 2. General Information a. Provide the following company information: i. Firm name ii. Business address iii. Primary contact name, email, and telephone number iv. Year established v. Type of ownership b. Subcontractor information and role. i. If applicable, provide details of any subcontractors who will contribute to the project, including their specific role. c. Experience i. Provide a summary of the applicant’s experience with similar stabilization, structural design, and geotechnical projects. ii. Include background information on key members of the project team and their relevant experience in similar projects. iii. Provide qualifications and certifications of key engineers and other technical staff. iv. Highlight any specialized skills that are particularly suited to this project, such as structural stabilization or geotechnical expertise. d. Potential or Perceived Conflicts of Interest i. Disclose any potential or perceived conflicts of interest that may affect this project. 3. Project Approach, Schedule, and Presentations ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 7 of 9 a. Provide a detailed narrative describing the applicant’s approach to completing the project as outlined. b. Submit an expected project schedule, with key milestones and deadlines, starting from anticipated contract approval in November 2024 through the project completion in May 2025. The application may propose a timeline that is less than the 6 months outlined. c. Describe the anticipated final deliverables, including structural stabilization plans, façade removal plans, geotechnical reports, and feasibility studies. d. Include any additional approaches or information relevant to demonstrating the applicant’s knowledge of and capacity to complete this project. 4. Resumes a. Provide resumes for all individuals who will be directly involved in the project. Each resume should outline the individual’s relevant experience and their proposed role in this project, following the qualifications listed in Section 2. 5. References Provide at least three references for similar projects completed by the applicant, including the following information: o Name of the project contact, their position, email address, and telephone number. o Description of the services provided and the applicant’s role in the project. 6. Project Costs a. Submit an overall project cost, including a breakdown of major tasks with associated costs. b. Include the hourly rates and hours by task for all key team members involved in the project. c. Provide a reimbursement schedule or detailed breakdown of anticipated reimbursable expenses related to the project. 7. Proof of Insurance for Contractor and Subcontractors a. Include a statement confirming that proof of the following insurance will be provided if awarded the contract: i. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance 1. Applicant shall have comprehensive general liability insurance coverage during the entire term of the contract, against claims arising out of bodily injury, death, damage to or destruction of the property of others, including loss of use thereof in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) in general aggregate. ii. Workers’ Compensation or Employers Liability Insurance 1. Applicant shall provide proof of workers’ compensation coverage, for all employees working on this project. Applicant’s coverage shall be under the Wyoming Workers Safety and Compensation program if statutorily required or such other workers’ compensation insurance as appropriate. Applicant’s insurance shall include Stop Gap coverage in the amount not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per employee for each accident and disease. Applicant shall also supply proof of worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance on any sub-applicant. 2. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 8 of 9 iii. Applicant shall provide proof of professional liability insurance or errors and omissions liability insurance to protect Committee from any and all claims arising from Applicant’s alleged or real professional errors, omissions or mistakes in the performance of professional duties by Applicant or his sub-applicants in an amount no less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). iv. Business Automobile Liability 1. Applicant shall maintain, during the entire term of the Contract, automobile liability insurance in an amount not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per occurrence. The RFP is to be signed by an official authorized to bind the offer and is to contain a statement to the effect that the RFP is a firm offer for a ninety (90) day period from opening. The RFP is also to provide the following information: name, title, address, email address, and telephone number of the individual(s) with authority to contractually bind the company and also who may be contacted during the period of RFP evaluation to clarify submittal information. Section Six Selection Procedures and Schedule Communication and Questions All communication regarding this RFP must be directed to Clara Chaffin at [EMAIL REDACTED]. Written questions are due by 3:00PM MT, October 31, 2024, and responses will be sent to those who submit questions or request to receive updates. Answers will also be posted on the City of Douglas Bid page. No other contact with City staff, Council members, agents, or consultants is allowed during the RFP process. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification. RFP Submission Instructions RFP responses must be submitted via email to [EMAIL REDACTED] with the subject line “RESPONSE TO RFP: Structural and Construction Design Services for Site Preparation at 112 N. 2nd St” by 4:00 PM MT, November 20, 2024. Evaluation Criteria Submitted proposals will be evaluated by the selection committee based on the following criteria: 1. Specialized Experience: Technical expertise of the firm and personnel in connection with the scope of services and project complexity. 2. Certifications: Wyoming-based engineer certifications relevant to the project. 3. Past Performance: Record of performance on previous contracts, including the quality of work, timeliness, and cost control. ---PAGE BREAK--- RFP: 112 N 2nd Structural and Civil Design Services, Douglas, WY Page 9 of 9 4. Capacity: Ability to complete the work within the time limitations, considering the firm’s current and planned workload. 5. Project Familiarity: Understanding of the type of project and the specific challenges associated with the scope of services. 6. Cost: Proposed hourly rates and overall cost of services. Anticipated Timeline (subject to change) • RFP Re-Issued: October 21, 2024. • Questions Due: 3:00 PM MT October 31, 2024. • Q&A Posted: 4:00 PM MT, November 1, 2024 • RFP Submission Due: 4:00 PM MST, November 20, 2024. • Tentative Virtual Interview: December 2-3, 2024. • City Council Approval: December 9, 2024. • Contract Execution: December 10-20, 2024. • Consultant Start Date: December 23, 2024. Appendices: • 2022 Structural Plans – Martin and Martin • 2022 Douglas Building Official Memo – City of Douglas • 2024 Structural Observations – Martin and Martin • 2020 Concept Plans – Ayres Associates We look forward to working with you! ---PAGE BREAK--- NORTH Martin/Martin, Inc. considers that design data is only in its final form on plotted drawings with original signatures and professional certification being visibly present on the drawings. Data supplied via computer generated format does not contain this approval or certification. The receiver of electronically transmitted drawings is responsible for verifying the information contained within the electronic data against the recorded or approved documents. The use of electronically transmitted drawings is considered to be at your own risk. Martin/Martin, Inc. assumes no responsibility for any claims or damages resulting from your use of this information. Electronic information is provided for the convenience of the recipient only. The recipient of this file agrees that the information may not be transferred to any other party. PROJECT NO: DATE: REVISIONS SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: MM JOB PRINCIPAL: EOR: PROJECT MANAGER: DESIGNERS: LEAD REVIT TECH: DATE PRINTED: FILE PATH: 11/9/2022 1:13:18 PM I:\2022\22-009 112 North Second St Douglas WY\3-Documents\Drawings\Structural\Current\22-009-112 N Second St Douglas WY-S22l.rvt EXISTING BASEMENT IN-FILL 112 North Second Street, Douglas WY, 82633 22.009 08/11/2022 S-100 ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS & GENERAL NOTES © MARTIN/MARTIN 2022 GFS GFS JRS 22.009 GFS EL CONCRETE NOTES 1) GENERAL: 1A)ENGINEER: REFERENCES ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO ‘ENGINEER’ MEAN THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD. OTHER ENTITIES ARE SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS “CONTRACTOR’S ENGINEER”, “MECHANICAL ENGINEER”, ETC. 1B)UNDERGROUND UTILITIES: LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR SUBGRADE CONDITIONS WHICH INTERFERE WITH WORK. 2) USE OF DRAWINGS: 2A)DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 2B)DETAILS ON DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND TYPICAL DETAILS. 2C)DETAILS NOTED TYPICAL APPLY TO ALL SIMILAR CONDITIONS. WHERE NO SPECIFIC DETAILS ARE SHOWN, CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO SIMILAR WORK ELSEWHERE ON THE PROJECT. 2D)WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN PLANS, DETAILS, GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS: - CONTACT THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION - THE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL GOVERN FOR BIDDING / PRICING 3) EXISTING STRUCTURES: 3A)CONTRACT DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PREPARED USING AVAILABLE DRAWINGS AND SITE OBSERVATION AS PERMITTED BY ACCESS RESTRICTIONS DURING DESIGN. 3B)DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MAY ENCOUNTER EXISTING CONDITIONS WHICH ARE NOT KNOWN OR ARE AT VARIANCE WITH PROJECT DOCUMENTATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ALL CONDITIONS NOT PER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. EXAMPLES INCLUDE: - SIZES OR DIMENSIONS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN - DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION TO MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS - CONDITIONS OF INSTABILITY OR LACK OF SUPPORT - ITEMS NOTED AS EXISTING ON THE DRAWINGS BUT NOT FOUND IN THE FIELD 3C)PREPARE DIMENSIONAL DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCOVERED ITEMS. 3D)CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING SHOP DRAWINGS. CONTRACT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFING ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING ELEMENTS MAY VARY FROM APPROXMIATE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PLAN. 3E)CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALLOWANCE FOR THE RESOLUTION OF SUCH DISCOVERIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. 4) SUBMITTALS AND SUBSTITUTIONS: 4A)SUBMITTALS: - IF THE CONTRACTOR REQUESTS A CHANGE FROM THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, IT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE MARTIN/MARTIN WYOMING, INC. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING SHOP DRAWINGS. VARIATION SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE SHOP DRAWINGS. - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED FOR USE IN SUBMITTALS - ALL SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL REFERENCE THE STRUCTURAL DRAWING NUMBER AND DETAIL USED TO PREPARE THE SUBMITTAL 4B)SUBSTITUTIONS: ENGINEER’S APPROVAL SHALL BE SECURED FOR ALL SUBSTITUTIONS 4C)NONCONFORMANCE: NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF CONDITIONS NOT CONSTRUCTED PER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CORRECTIVE WORK. SUBMIT PROPOSED REPAIR TO THE ARCHITECT FOR ACCEPTANCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPENSATE MARTIN/MARTIN, INC. FOR DESIGNING THE REPAIR. 5) TEMPORARY CONDITIONS, CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING, AND OSHA STANDARDS: 5A)THE STRUCTURE IS DESIGNED TO FUNCTION AS A UNIT UPON COMPLETION AND ONLY FOR LOADS ANTICIPATED DURING THE STRUCTURE’S SERVICE LIFE. 5B)THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL TEMPORARY BRACING AND/OR SUPPORT THAT MAY BE REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF THE CONTRACTOR’S CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND/OR SEQUENCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED ENGINEERING AND OTHER MEASURES TO ACHIEVE THE MEANS, METHODS, AND SEQUENCES OF WORK WHICH MAY INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: - LAYOUT - DESIGN FOR FORMWORK AND SHORING - DESIGN OF CONCRETE MIXES - DESIGN OF TEMPORARY BRACING OF WALLS FOR WIND, SEISMIC, OR SOIL LOADS - SURVEYING TO VERIFY CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES - EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LOADS ON STRUCTURE DUE TO EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TO RESIST ANY OTHER LOADS NOT IDENTIFIED ON DESIGN DRAWINGS 5C)NOTHING SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS. WHERE THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH OSHA REQUIREMENTS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS REPRESENT FINAL CONDITIONS ONLY. SHEET LIST SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME S-100 ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS & GENERAL NOTES S-200 IN-FILL PLAN S-250 ELEVATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA 1) CODES AND STANDARDS: 1A)GENERAL DESIGN - IBC 2018 1B)LOADS - ASCE/SEI 7-10 "MINIMUM DESIGN LOAD FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES" WHERE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS INDIVIDUAL UNFACTORED LOAD COMPONENTS Di, L, Lr, R, S, H, F, Fa, E, W, Wi, T) ARE AS DEFINED AND DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS INDICATED. LOAD COMPONENTS SHALL BE COMBINED USING THE LOAD COMBINATIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE FOR SPECIALTY DESIGN BY OTHERS. 1C)CONCRETE - ACI 301-10 "SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS" - ACI 318-11 "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE" GENERAL NOTES 1) GENERAL: 1A)ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH ACI 301-10, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN DRAWINGS OR PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 2) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE MIX REQUIREMENTS: 3) CONSTRUCTION/CONTROL JOINTS: 3A)SUBMIT DRAWINGS SHOWING CONSTRUCTION AND CONTROL JOINT LOCATIONS ALONG WITH THE SEQUENCE OF POURS. CONSTRUCTION JOINT LOCATIONS AND CASTING SEQUENCE SHALL BE ARRANGED TO MINIMIZE THE EFFECTS OF ELASTIC AND LONG-TERM SHORTENING/SHRINKAGE. 3B)CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN SLABS-ON-GRADE SHALL BE LOCATED TO ACCOMMODATE THE MAXIMUM LENGTH AND AREA THE CONTRACTOR CAN REASONABLY POUR, FINISH, AND JOINT IN THE SAME DAY. 3C)CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION JOINT SURFACE SHALL BE CLEANED AND ALL LAITANCE AND LOOSE MATERIAL REMOVED PRIOR TO SECOND CONCRETE PLACEMENT. FRC = MACROFIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE. 3 LB/YD b. ABBREVIATIONS FOR OTHER REQUIREMENTS AS FOLLOWS: a. WHERE AIR CONTENT IS INDICATED IN THE MIX TABLE, PROVIDE AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURE. TOTAL AIR CONTENT LIMITS INCLUDE BOTH ENTRAINED AND ENTRAPPED AIR 1.5%. FOR CONCRETE PLACED BY PUMPING PROVIDE CONCRETE MIX FLOWABILITY TO FACILITATE PUMPING. ENTRAINED AIR MAY BE USED TO FACILITATE PUMPING SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF NOTE b BELOW. USE TYPE I / II PORTLAND CEMENT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FOR CONCRETE MIXES USED ON FLOORS MINIMUM CEMENTITIOUS CONTENT SHALL BE 540 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD - PROVIDE WORKABILITY AND CONSISTENCY TO PERMIT CONCRETE TO BE WORKED READILY INTO FORMS AND AROUND REINFORCEMENT UNDER CONDITIONS OF PLACEMENT TO BE EMPLOYED, WITHOUT SEGREGATION OR EXCESSIVE BLEEDING. CONTRACTOR SHALL SELECT APPROPRIATE SLUMP. USE ADMIXTURES AS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN DESIRED RESULTS. - PROVIDE THE MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS INDICATED IN THE MIX TABLE. DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM WATER-CEMENT RATIO NOTED. PROPORTIONS OF MATERIALS IN CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE ESTABLISHED TO: CONCRETE MIX TABLE NOTES: 1 EXTERIOR SLAB ON GRADE 5 NWC 0.40 3/4 (#67) 6 FRC CONC MIX TYPE INTENDED USE MIN 28 DAY STRENGTH f'c (KSI) CONC WEIGHT MAX W/C RATIO, INCLUDING FLY ASH MAX AGGREGATE SIZE, IN (ASTM C33) TOTAL AIR CONTENT NOTE a OTHER REQTS, NOTE b CONCRETE MIX TABLE - SMALL PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT SCOPE THIS PROJECT INCLUDES IN-FILL OF AN EXISTING BASEMENT AT 112 NORTH 2ND STREET IN DOUGLAS, WYOMING. SITE WAS ORGINALLY A BUILDING WHICH AS BEEN DEMOLISHED. THE EXISTING BASEMENT HAS BEEN PARTIALLY FILLED IN WITH SOIL. DUE TO CONCERNS OF INCREASING HORIZONTAL SOIL PRESSURE ON THE BASEMENT WALLS OF THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS IN-FILLING WITH SOIL IS NOT RECOMMENDED. THESE DRAWINGS INCLUDE REMOVAL OF THE PARTIALLY IN-FILLED SOIL, FILLING IN THE BASEMENT WITH CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH FILL AND TOPPING THE SITE WITH A CONCRETE SLAB. NO. ISSUE DATE 1 CITY COMMENTS 09-27-22 2 CD 11-09-22 1) SALVAGE MATERIALS: 1A)SAVE ALL HISTORIC MATERIALS (MOST MATERIALS ON THE FACADE QUALITY AS HISTORIC) FOR USE IN THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE STRUCTURE. 1B) MATERIAL TO BE SAVED, SALVAGED SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO PRIMARY DEMOLITION. MATERIAL TO BE SALVAGED SHALL BE REMOVED WITH CARE AND WITHOUT DAMAGE. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCOUNT FOR ADDITIONAL TIME REQUIRED TO REMOVE MATERIAL TO BE SALVAGED. 1C)SALVAGED MATERIAL SHALL BE STORED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO PROTECT MATERIAL FROM DAMAGE. SALVAGED MATERIAL SHALL BE STORED IN A SECURE AND WEATHER PROTECTED ENVIROMENTMENT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS IT IS DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF DOUGLAS. 1D)CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF DOUGLAS TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO DELIVERING SALVAGED MATERIAL. SALVAGED MATERIAL SHALL BE DELIVERED AND UNLOADED AT A LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DOUGLAS. SALVAGE MATERIALS 11-9-2022 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 S-250 1 S-250 EXISTING BRICK BUILDING WITH BASEMENT EXISTING BRICK BUILDING WITH BASEMENT SLOPE DOWN SLOPE PERIMETER 12" DOWN AWAY FROM EXISTING BUILDING - TYP SLOPE PERIMETER AT 1:12 FOR 12" ADJACENT TO EXISTING BUILDING - TYP DEMOLISH STOREFRONT BETWEEN EXISTING BUILDINGS - SEE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECOND STREET EXISTING SIDEWALK 51'-0" EXISTING PARKING LOT / ALLEY 50'-0" 121'-0" 110'-0" 2/S-250 DEMOLISH BASEMENT RETURN WALL AND TOP OF ADJACENT PARAPET WALL - SEE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4/S-250 1 S-200 TYP 2 S-200 TYP EXISTING PORCH 1/S-200 4" MINIMUM THICKNESS SLAB WITH FIBER REINFORCING - SEE CONCRETE MIX TABLE LIGHT BROOM FINISH 2 S-200 TYP 1% MIN - 2% MAXIMUM SLOPE SEE PLAN NOTES SUGGESTED CONTROL JOINT ARRANGMENT - GC TO SUBMIT FINAL CONTROL JOINT LAYOUT BASED ON FIELD VERIFIED INFORMATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION - 12'-0" MAX SPACING - ARRANGE IN SQUARE SECTIONS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE S-100 S-100 DEMOLISH EXISTING SLAB AND A MINIMUM OF THE TOP 2'-6" OF WALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING LINER NOTES: 1. PROVIDE TOOLED JOINT OR SAW CUT AS SOON AS THE CONCRETE HAS HARDENED SUFFICIENTLY TO PERMIT CUTTING WITHOUT CHIPPING, SPALLING, OR TEARING (BUT NOT MORE THAN 12 HOURS AFTER CASTING) NOTE 1 T/3 4" MIN JOINT SEALANT - SEE PLAN NOTES 1/4" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER JOINT SEALANT - SEE PLAN NOTES 1" EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING BASEMENT WALL IN-FILL PER PLAN NOTES SLAB PER PLAN NOTES JOINT PER 2/S-200 SEE AND FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING STOREFRONT WALL 4/S-250 2/S-250 Martin/Martin, Inc. considers that design data is only in its final form on plotted drawings with original signatures and professional certification being visibly present on the drawings. Data supplied via computer generated format does not contain this approval or certification. The receiver of electronically transmitted drawings is responsible for verifying the information contained within the electronic data against the recorded or approved documents. The use of electronically transmitted drawings is considered to be at your own risk. Martin/Martin, Inc. assumes no responsibility for any claims or damages resulting from your use of this information. Electronic information is provided for the convenience of the recipient only. The recipient of this file agrees that the information may not be transferred to any other party. PROJECT NO: DATE: REVISIONS SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: MM JOB PRINCIPAL: EOR: PROJECT MANAGER: DESIGNERS: LEAD REVIT TECH: DATE PRINTED: FILE PATH: 11/9/2022 1:13:19 PM I:\2022\22-009 112 North Second St Douglas WY\3-Documents\Drawings\Structural\Current\22-009-112 N Second St Douglas WY-S22l.rvt EXISTING BASEMENT IN-FILL 112 North Second Street, Douglas WY, 82633 22.009 08/11/2022 S-200 IN-FILL PLAN © MARTIN/MARTIN 2022 GFS GFS JRS 22.009 GFS EL NO SCALE BASEMENT IN-FILL PLAN 1. GENERAL: A. SEE SERIES SHEETS FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2. IN-FILL : CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH FILL: A. CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH FILL MATERIAL: BASIS OF DESIGN FOAMED FLASHFILL BY FLASHFILL SERVICES, LLC. a. LEAN CONCRETE IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH FILL ALTERNATE. B. CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH FILL TO BE PLACED IN LIFTS OR AT A RATE OF PLACEMENT SUCH THAT A MAXIMUM OF 12" OF EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE IS IMPOSED ON ADJACENT BUILDING WALLS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW BY ENGINEER, PROCEDURE SHALL INCLUDE VERIFICATION THAT ADDITIONAL FLUID PRESSURE IS NOT PLACED ON ADJACENT WALLS. SUBMIT PRODUCT DATA INCLUDING HISTORICAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS, MIX DESIGN AND PLACEMENT PROCEDURE A MINIMUM OF THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. C. FILL REQUIREMENTS: a. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS SHALL BE BETWEEN 100 PSI AND 250 PSI WHEN TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4832. b. UNIT DENSITY BETWEEN 50 PCF AND 145 PCF. c. MATERIAL SHALL BE SELF CONSOLIDATING. d. MAXIMUM AIR CONTENT SHALL NOT EXCEED e. MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN CONTACT WITH PVC. D. TEST REQUIREMENTS: a. TEST CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH FILL PER ASTM D4832. b. TEST 4x8 CYLINDERS EVERY 150 CUBIC YARDS. TESTING SCHEDULE CYLINDERS AT 28 DAYS, CYLINDER AT 56 DAYS. E. IN-FILL SETTLEMENT: CONTRACTOR TO ALLOW IN-FILL AND SUBGRADE 28 DAYS FOR SUBGRADE SETTLEMENT TO OCCUR PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE SLAB. 3. SLAB-ON-GRADE: A. SEE DETAIL FOR TYPICAL SLAB-ON-GRADE CONTROL JOINT DETAIL. B. SEE PLAN FOR SLAB SLOPES. C. CONTROL JOINT AND EDGE OF SLAB SEALANT: ONE PART SILICONE BASED SEALANT FORMULATED SPECIFICALLY FOR SEALING CONCRETE JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D5893. a. SEALANT TO BE APPLIED PER MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS. b. USE TYPE SELF-LEVELING WITH TOP OF SEALANT AT TOP OF SLAB ELEVATION. c. ULTIMATE ELONGATION: 600% MINIMUM d. MINIMUM OF 5000 HOURS PRIOR TO CHALKING, CRACKING OR LOSS OF BOND ACCORDING TO ASTM C793. e. TACK FREE TIME: 180 MINUTES ACCORDING TO ASTM C679. f. WARRANTY: 20 YEARS. 4. SITE GRADE AND SLAB SLOP: A. A SITE SURVEY HAS NOT BEEN PERFOMED, THE SLOPE RANGE SHOWN ON PLAN IS THE DESIRED AND ANTICIPATED SLOPE. GC SHALL VERIFY SITE ELEVATIONS AND PROVIDE SLAB SLOPE FOR REVIEW A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF CONTROLLED FILL. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCOUNT FOR AND ANTICIPATE COORDINATE OF SITE ELEVATION IN COST AND SCHEDULE. 5. MISCELLANEOUS NOTES: A. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD LOCATE ALL UTILITIES BELOW GRADE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER AND OWNER BY DIMENSIONED DRAWING OF LOCATIONS WHERE UTILITIES ARE BELOW FILL AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALLOWANCE FOR THE RESOLUTION OF SUCH DISCOVERIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH EFFECTED FOUNDATIONS. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL CAP EXISTING UTILITIES ENTERING FILL AREA FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS, COORDINATE WORK WITH ADJACENT BUILDING OWNER. NORTH NO SCALE 1 SLAB-ON-GRADE CONTROL JOINT NO SCALE 2 TYP SOG ISOLATION JOINT 3/4" = 1'-0" 3 EDGE OF BASEMENT/SIDEWALK NO. ISSUE DATE 1 CITY COMMENTS 09-27-22 2 CD 11-09-22 11-9-2022 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 S-250 SLAB PER PLAN S-200 2 UNDISTRUBED SOIL - DO NOT OVEREXCAVATE IN-FILL PER PLAN NOTES EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING EXCAVATE SOIL TO TOP OF ADJACENT BUILDING SLAB ON GRADE - TYP APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE 3 S-250 SLAB PER PLAN SLOPE AS INDICATED 3'-0" 1 1/2 1 IN-FILL PER PLAN NOTES 1 1/2 1 EXISTING BUILDING BEYOND EDGE OF IN-FILL TO ALIGN WITH BACK WALL OF ADJACENT BUILDING - EDGE OF IN-FILL WILL NOT BE PARALLEL TO FRONT OF IN-FILL EXISTING STOREFRONT TO BE REMOVED - SEE UNDISTRUBED SOIL - DO NOT OVEREXCAVATE 2/S-250 9'-6 25/128" 10'-0" 3'-0" EXISTING SIDEWALK S-200 3 EXISTING BASEMENT WALL EXTENT OF EXISTING STOREFRONT WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED - DEMOLITION TO INCLUDE WOOD BRACING STRUCTURE BEHIND EXISTING STOREFRONT WALL CONTRACTOR TO TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING ADJACENT BRICK - REPAIR ANY BRICKS THAT BECOME LOOSE OR DAMAGED WHICH ARE TO REMAIN - FILL ANY VOIDS EXPOSED IN MULTI-WYTH WALL WITH SALVAGED BRICKS - REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS AS NEEDED AT NEWLY EXPOSED CORNER SALVAGE TERRA COTTA BANDS SALVAGE "FLOWER" WASHERS AND BOLTS ALONG FULL LENGTH OF STOREFRONT BEAM SALVAGE BRICK - COORDINATE QUANTITY WITH CITY OF DOUGLAS CUT TERRA COTTA BANDS FLUSH WITH OUTSIDE EDGE OF RETURN WALL SALVAGE DOUGLAS HISTORIC PLAQUE DEMOLISH WOOD BRACING STRUCTURE DEMOLISH TOP 2'-6" OF RETURN WALL DEMOLISH TOP OF EXISTING SIDE WALL TO MATCH ADJACENT BUILDING PARAPET HEIGHT - CONFIRM WORK WITH ADJACENT BUILDING OWNER PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION - REPAIR ANY BRICKS THAT BECOME LOOSE OR DAMAGED WHICH ARE TO REMAIN - FILL VOIDS EXPOSED IN MULTI-WYTH WALL WITH SALVAGED BRICKS - REPOINT JOINTS AS NEEDED - PROVIDE AND INSTALL METAL PARAPET CAP BELOW DEMOLISHED WALL - REPAIR ANY DAMAGED ROOF FLASHING EXISTING BASEMENT WALL TO REMAIN Martin/Martin, Inc. considers that design data is only in its final form on plotted drawings with original signatures and professional certification being visibly present on the drawings. Data supplied via computer generated format does not contain this approval or certification. The receiver of electronically transmitted drawings is responsible for verifying the information contained within the electronic data against the recorded or approved documents. The use of electronically transmitted drawings is considered to be at your own risk. Martin/Martin, Inc. assumes no responsibility for any claims or damages resulting from your use of this information. Electronic information is provided for the convenience of the recipient only. The recipient of this file agrees that the information may not be transferred to any other party. PROJECT NO: DATE: REVISIONS SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: MM JOB PRINCIPAL: EOR: PROJECT MANAGER: DESIGNERS: LEAD REVIT TECH: DATE PRINTED: FILE PATH: 11/9/2022 1:13:19 PM I:\2022\22-009 112 North Second St Douglas WY\3-Documents\Drawings\Structural\Current\22-009-112 N Second St Douglas WY-S22l.rvt EXISTING BASEMENT IN-FILL 112 North Second Street, Douglas WY, 82633 22.009 08/11/2022 S-250 ELEVATIONS © MARTIN/MARTIN 2022 GFS GFS JRS 22.009 GFS EL NO SCALE 3 Cross Section N/S NO SCALE 1 Cross Section E/W 3/4" = 1'-0" 2 FRONT VIEW NO SCALE 4 BACK VIEW NO. ISSUE DATE 1 CITY COMMENTS 09-27-22 2 CD 11-09-22 11-9-2022 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 01/17/2024 January 17, 2024 JD Cox City of Douglas 101 N 4th St. Douglas, WY 82633 Re: 112 North 2nd Street East Façade Observation Mr. Cox: As requested, we have completed our structural observation of the east façade located at 112 N. 2nd Street in Douglas, WY. The observation was completed on Wednesday, January 10th, 2024, in an effort to visually assess the condition of the existing facade along the East side of the property and the temporary stabilization support system constructed in 2015. This observation and report are only intended to identify discernable signs of distress, movement, and deterioration compared to our office’s last visual observation report dated November 12, 2020. OBSERVATIONS The North and South existing walls on each side of the property do not show evidence of movement since the previous observation. Both appear to be stable at this time. There is substantial plant growth and plant debris in the former basement area since the previous inspection, however the overall backfill slopes and drainage appear to be in similar condition to previous observations. The backfill slopes down to a center area covered with a tarp material to retain water. (See photos 1 and 2) The exposed faces of the North and South walls have been painted since the last site observation performed by Martin/Martin Wyoming. Both walls appeared to be in similar condition as previously observed. We have noted a crack at the base of the North wall located approximately 20 feet from the East elevation that appears from grade level up several courses into the masonry and grouted pocket above. We are unable to determine where the crack originated or when it may have formed. (See photo 3) The OSB sheathed walls of the stabilization system bracing the East façade appear to be in relatively poor condition due to prolonged exposure. Checking, delamination, and warping of various members of the floor was evident at the time of observation and continues to undergo corrosion. (See photos 4 and Several of the diagonal wood cross members at the roof level have either partially or fully detached from the horizontal girt and sheathed walls of the stabilization system since the previous inspection. This includes both cross members in the middle portion as well as one member in the south portion. The bracing of the ---PAGE BREAK--- 112 North 2nd Street East Façade Observation January 17, 2024 P a g e 2 I 7 East façade is considered compromised and no longer adequate based on our understanding of the initial design of the stabilization system. (See photos 4 and The wood header framing was missing at one of the window openings, thus exposing the interior brick header. This lack of support is considered a hazard which can result in the bricks detaching and falling over time. (See photo The wall sheathing of the two sheathing walls at the foundation level are showing increased signs of deterioration beneath the weather barrier at the base where they were not painted with the water-resistant paint (See photo The original design capacity of the walls is reduced by this deterioration and their capacity to adequately brace the walls is questionable. Previous visual building assessments by Pillar Engineering indicated slight bowing at the top of the wall deflecting towards the street. Increased movement or deflection of the wall was not evident at the time of this observation. The wall appeared stable at the time of the site visit. (See photo RECOMMENDATIONS As noted above and in previous reports to your office, the stabilization system for the east façade was provided as a temporary system and continues to undergo extensive decay and loss of integrity due to exposure beyond its intended use. Therefore, while stable at the time of the observation, continued use of the structure in its condition is a risk for failure and possible collapse if repair and/or a more suitable, permanent fix is not provided. It is not possible to quantify the capacity of the remaining structure due to its compromised condition. Therefore, we would like to reiterate the importance of either removing the remaining structure and stabilization system and/or replacing it with a more permanent system as soon as possible. LIMITATIONS Previous structural assessments and repair recommendations by Pillar Structural Engineering were provided prior to the observation. These documents and drawings were used by our office to acquire a comprehensive understanding of the existing structure, repairs, recommendations, and assessments. These documents were not analyzed by Martin/Martin Wyoming and, therefore, we do not take responsibility for the adequacy of the design, construction, or recommendations previously provided as they were not under the direct supervision of our office. Our investigation was limited solely to exterior observations of the property on 112 North 2nd Street and is based on conditions that were readily observable at the time of our site visit. Existing drawings were not provided for review and no invasive testing was performed. Neither the investigation nor this report is intended to cover mechanical, electrical, architectural, or other features beyond those described above. Martin/Martin Wyoming, Inc. does not accept responsibility for deficiencies not evident during an observation of this type. ---PAGE BREAK--- 112 North 2nd Street East Façade Observation January 17, 2024 P a g e 3 I 7 We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this report or if you require further assistance. Sincerely, John Shaffer, PE Principal ---PAGE BREAK--- 112 North 2nd Street East Façade Observation January 17, 2024 P a g e 4 I 7 PHOTOS Photo 1 – Overview of Property Looking East Photo 2 – Overview of Property Looking West ---PAGE BREAK--- 112 North 2nd Street East Façade Observation January 17, 2024 P a g e 5 I 7 Photo 3 – Crack at Base of North Wall Photo 4 – Middle Portion of Stabilization System, Missing Cross Bracing, and Deteriorating Platform ---PAGE BREAK--- 112 North 2nd Street East Façade Observation January 17, 2024 P a g e 6 I 7 Photo 5 – South Portion of Stabilization System, Missing Cross Bracing, and Deteriorating Platform Photo 6 – Brick Support at Header Missing ---PAGE BREAK--- 112 North 2nd Street East Façade Observation January 17, 2024 P a g e 7 I 7 Photo 7 – Deteriorated Sheathing at Base of South Stabilization Wall Photo 8 – East Façade from Street ---PAGE BREAK--- UP UP 2,494.62 SF COMMERCIAL SPACE 1 193.81 SF STOR./MECH. 2 HALL 3 HALL 4 VESTIBULE 5 MEN 6 WOMEN 7 JAN. 8 STAIR 9 MAIL/PARCEL ELEV. 10 STAIR 11 EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 1,610.06 SF GARAGE 12 Scale 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/15/2021 2:30:41 PM 1 DOUGLAS, WY REDEVELOPMENT MURPHY'S WALL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 1 FIRST FLOOR ---PAGE BREAK--- UP DW DW DW DW UP ELEV. 13 STAIR 14 STAIR 15 UNIT C - 2 BED 16 UNIT D - 1 BED 17 UNIT A - 2 BED 18 UNIT B - 2 BED 19 HALL 20 BEDROOM BEDROOM LIVING ROOM KITCHEN BATH BATH WIC STOR./LAUND. KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH BATH BATH BATH BATH WIC WIC WIC WIC WIC WIC STOR./LAUND. STOR./ LAUND . STOR./LAUND. DINING DINING DINING DINING 1,281 SF 1,923 SF 1,051 SF 1,358 SF EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING Scale 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/15/2021 2:30:42 PM 2 DOUGLAS, WY REDEVELOPMENT MURPHY'S WALL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 1 SECOND FLOOR ---PAGE BREAK--- DW DW DW DW ELEV. 21 STAIR 22 STAIR 23 HALL 24 UNIT A - 2 BED 25 UNIT B - 2 BED 26 UNIT E - 2 BED 27 UNIT F - 1 BED 28 BEDROOM BEDROOM LIVING ROOM BATH BATH WIC STOR./LAUND. KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH BATH BATH BATH BATH WIC WIC WIC WIC WIC WIC STOR./LAUND. STOR./ LAUND . STOR./LAUND. DINING DINING DINING DINING 1,281 SF 1,923 SF 957 SF 1,258 SF EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING Scale 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/15/2021 2:30:42 PM 3 DOUGLAS, WY REDEVELOPMENT MURPHY'S WALL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 1 THIRD FLOOR ---PAGE BREAK--- Scale 1/15/2021 2:30:55 PM 4 DOUGLAS, WY REDEVELOPMENT MURPHY'S WALL SCALE: 4 1 SOUTHEAST CORNER ---PAGE BREAK--- Scale 1/15/2021 2:31:06 PM 5 DOUGLAS, WY REDEVELOPMENT MURPHY'S WALL SCALE: 5 1 SOUTHWEST CORNER ---PAGE BREAK--- Scale 1/15/2021 2:31:18 PM 6 DOUGLAS, WY REDEVELOPMENT MURPHY'S WALL SCALE: 6 1 NORTHEAST CORNER