← Back to Columbia County, GA

Document Columbiacountyga_doc_e5432178a3

Full Text

Site ID/Name: Location: Inspector: Date: PERMEABLE PAVEMENT Pervious Concrete (PC) (applicable to Porous Asphalt) GENERAL INSPECTION QUESTIONS Note: ‘Yes’ indicates a maintenance need and action General: 1. Is access to the site inadequately maintained for inspection and maintenance? YES / NO 2. Is there evidence of runoff short-circuiting (going around) the practice? YES / NO 3. Is there evidence of gullies, rills, or erosion around the practice? YES / NO Drainage Area: (pertains to the surrounding landscape that will contribute runoff to the practice) 4. Does the vegetation around the practice need to be pruned/mowed? Is vegetation unhealthy? signs of bare/dead grass) YES / NO Note: grass clippings should be removed. 5. Is there any exposed or unstable soil around the practice that could cause sediment accumulation within the practice? YES / NO QUALITATIVE INSPECTION QUESTIONS (GOOD/MARGINAL/POOR) Note: ‘Poor’ indicates a maintenance need and action 12. Rate the presence of undesirable vegetation. 13. Rate the presence of sediment accumulation in pore spaces. 14. Rate the presence of debris leaves, trash, grass clippings) on the permeable pavement surface. 15. Rate the presence of concrete raveling. aggregate becoming loose) 16. Is there visible smearing of pervious concrete? no visible pore space) GOOD EXAMPLES Permeable Pavement Surface: 6. Is there evidence of long-term ponding or standing water in the practice? 7. Are there signs of the pervious concrete settling or cracking? YES / NO YES / NO Inlets/Outlets: 8. Do drainage ways (overland flow or pipes) to the practice have trash, debris, large branches, etc. present? 9. If cleanouts are included, are caps missing? 10. If an underdrain system is included, are there signs of it clogging or a blockage? YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO 11. Does the emergency overflow have trash, debris, sediment or structural damage present? YES / NO GOOD (<25% of area) MARGINAL (25-50%) POOR GOOD (<25% of area) MARGINAL (25-50%) POOR GOOD (<25% of area) MARGINAL (25-50%) POOR GOOD (<25% of area) MARGINAL (25-50%) POOR GOOD (<25% of area) MARGINAL (25-50%) POOR COMMENTS: ---PAGE BREAK--- EXAMPLES OF POTENTIAL ISSUES: 5 UNSTABLE DRAINAGE AREA 5 UNSTABLE DRAINAGE AREA 6 STANDING WATER, 6 PONDING / STANDING WATER 7 CRACKING-STRUCTURAL 12 VEGETATION (POOR) & 13 SEDIMENT (POOR) & 14 DEBRIS (MARGINAL) & 13 SEDIMENT (POOR) 7 CRACKING & 15 RAVELING (POOR) 13 SEDIMENT (POOR) 7 CRACKING-STRUCTURAL 13 SEDIMENT (POOR) 14 DEBRIS (MARGINAL) 16 SMEARING (POOR) (COVERED WITH ASPHALT SEALER) 15 RAVELING (POOR) 15 RAVELING (MARGINAL) 16 SMEARING (POOR) 16 SMEARING (POOR)