Full Text
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-10 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, TO BE LOCATED IN TITLE 10, ZONING REGULATIONS, OF THE CITY OF CODY MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing to consider this action was published in the Cody Enterprise on March 28, 2017; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 13, 2017 before the City Council, as advertised, at which meeting the City Council heard comments from all persons wishing to speak for or against the proposed ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Cody City Council has thoroughly reviewed the matter and deems that it is in the best interest of the public and the City of Cody to approve the proposed ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF CODY, PARK COUNTY, WYOMING: 1. “Wireless Communications Facility*, pursuant to Chapter 10-11-2” is hereby added to City of Cody Code Sections 10-10A-2(B) [Limited Business zoning district], 10-10B-2(B) [General Business zoning district], 10-10C-2(B) [Open Business/Light-Industrial zoning district], 10-10E-1 [Industrial E zoning district], and 10-10F-2 [Heavy Industrial zoning district]; 2. Chapter 10-11, Wireless Communications Facilities, as found in Exhibit A, is hereby adopted as part of Title 10, Zoning Regulations; and, 3. The Wireless Communications Facility Overlay zoning district as shown in Exhibit B, is hereby added to the Official City of Cody Zoning Map. This Ordinance shall become effective at the final passage and publication in the Cody Enterprise as required by law. PASSED ON FIRST READING: March 21, 2017 PASSED ON SECOND READING: April 4, 2017 PASSED ON THIRD READING: April 13, 2017 Matt Hall, Mayor Attest: Baker Administrative Services Director ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A, Ordinance 2017-10 CHAPTER 11 SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 10-11-1 APPLICABILITY 10-11-2 SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 10-11-1 APPLICABILITY The land uses that are identified with an asterisk in the Limited Business General Business Open Business/Light-Industrial Industrial and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning districts are subject to the corresponding regulations of this chapter, which regulations are in addition to other applicable sections of this title and any conditions that may be imposed pursuant to a conditional use permit review. The standards of this chapter shall apply unless waived or altered pursuant to the zoning variance process; provided, those standards identified herein with may be waived or altered pursuant to the Special Exemption process of Section 10-14-2. In no case shall any of the following standards be waived or modified to the extent that the result is tantamount to a rezone or the use no longer meets the specified definition thereof. 10-11-2 SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The supplemental development standards are listed by use, in alphabetical order: Uses. Wireless Communication Facilities: 1. Purpose/Intent: A. The City of Cody recognizes the benefits of quality wireless communication services and the need to accommodate facilities that provide such services. B. The City of Cody desires to protect the community’s visual quality and safety while facilitating the reasonable and balanced provision of wireless communication services. More specifically, it is the City’s goal to minimize the visual impact of wireless communication facilities on the community, particularly in rights-of-way and residential zones. C. The quality and variety of the scenic viewsheds that are available to the residents and visitors to the area are irreplaceable and warrant protection from unnecessary visual pollution. The City of Cody encourages providers to maximize the use of options that conceal the components of wireless communication facilities (i.e. stealth design) wherever feasible. D. The natural landforms within and around the City of Cody provide a unique opportunity for the location and design of wireless communication facilities, such that design engineers can utilize those natural features and topographic elevation differences in combination with the built environment to both minimize visual impacts and maximize coverage. Historically, almost all current providers in the area have relied on a primary tower on Carter Mountain (in the county), because such location provides coverage not only to the City, but to areas west of the mountain as well. Coverage and capacity is improved through smaller facilities dispersed throughout the Cody area, where fiber optic and power services are existing or readily available. With LTE and LTE-Advanced technology being implemented, more facilities, serving smaller service areas will be needed. The locations and designs of those facilities must be sensitive to the Cody community. ---PAGE BREAK--- E. The size and configuration of the City of Cody is such that a network of tall towers is unnecessary to provide quality coverage to its residents and visitors. The City prefers that the local network system of wireless communication facilities be of a dispersed design—e.g. using two or more smaller facilities instead of one larger tower. Bulkier and/or taller facilities within the city limits are restricted to those areas identified as within the Wireless Communications Overlay district. F. If modifications to these regulations are needed to accommodate the seemingly ever-changing provisions of the Federal Telecommunications Act FCC rules and regulations, the context of such consideration shall be as an amendment to the zoning ordinance, as opposed to a special exemption or variance. Consistent with federal law, the development standards specified in this section shall not be administered so as to have the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless communications services. G. The City desires to provide regulations which are specifically not intended to, and shall not be interpreted or applied to, prohibit or effectively prohibit the provision of personal wireless services, unreasonably discriminate among functionally equivalent service providers, or regulate wireless communication facilities and wireless transmission equipment on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such emissions comply with the standards established by the Federal Communications Commission. 2. Applicability: Every wireless communication facility located within the city limits, whether upon private or public lands, is subject to the standards of this section, except that the following facilities are exempt from the standards: A. Amateur Radio Station Operator/Receive-Only Antenna if owned and operated by a federally licensed amateur radio station operator or used exclusively for a receive- only antenna; B. Satellite earth stations, dishes and/or antennas used for private television reception not exceeding one meter in diameter; C. Any existing tower and antenna, provided a valid building permit was issued for the tower or antenna prior to adoption of this section; and, D. Emergency Services. Wireless communication facilities used exclusively for emergency services including police, fire, and operation of the water utility, when not located on a new freestanding antenna support structure (e.g. tower or dedicated pole).; and E. A temporary, commercial WCF installed for providing coverage of a special event such as news coverage or sporting event, subject to administrative approval by the City. The WCF shall be exempt from the provisions of this Chapter for up to one week before and after the duration of the special event. 3. Distributed Antenna Systems and Small Cells: A. Distributed Antenna Systems and small cells which comply with the height limit of the zoning district and do not require installation of a new tower, utility support structure or building are allowed in all zones, provided the applicant complies with all federal laws (such as the Americans with Disabilities Act), and State laws, and all of the applicable City development regulationsrequirements herein. B. Distributed Antenna Systems and small cells that do not meet the above requirements, and which are located in a residential zoning district, shall be subject to Conditional Use Permit review. DAS and small cells that do not meet the above ---PAGE BREAK--- requirements and are located in a zone that is not residential, shall be subject to review pursuant to #4 below.in all zones are subject to approval via administrative review unless their installation requires the construction of a new tower, utility support structure or building. A Conditional Use Permit is required when the applicant proposes a new tower, utility support structure or building subject to the exceptions for certain zones. C. The City encourages but it does not require the use of DAS and small cells. Each applicant will submit a statement that explains how it arrived at the structure and design being proposed. 34. Classification and Level of Review: Within the Limited Business General Business Open Business/Light- Industrial Industrial and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning districts, Aall wireless communications facilities, except co-location collocation, small cells and DAS as defined and addressed herein, shall be subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Board for analysis of the site plan and applicable zoning standards and criteria. The level of review shall be based on the classification of the facility according to the following standards: A. Within the Limited Business General Business Open Business/Light-Industrial Industrial and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning districts, the following wireless communications facilities are permitted uses: 1. MicrocellMonopoleDistributed Antenna Systems and small cells that do not qualify for review under #3 above, (if small cells or a Distributed Antenna System is attached), when not greater than thirty-five feet in total height above existing natural grade, and when located no more than within twenty feet (SE) from an existing structure or tree that is at least twenty-five feet (SE) in total height. 2. Slim-Line Design PoleMonopole, when: only small cells or a Distributed Antenna System is attached; it is not greater than forty feet in total height above existing natural grade, and when located no more than within twenty feet (SE) from an existing structure or tree that is at least thirty feet (SE) in total height. For purposes of this, monopole is a pole with one or more antennas, on which the antenna panels are narrow and closely spaced with one another atop the pole and extend no more than one foot beyond the circumference of the pole. 3. Stealth Design Wireless Communication Facility, when architecturally integrated into an existing building or structure that was not originally constructed as an antenna support structure, and total height is not more than forty feet or the height limit of the zoning district, whichever is less. B. Within the General Business Open Business/Light-Industrial Industrial and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning districts, the following wireless communications facilities are permitted uses: 1. Roof-top installations on non-residential buildings, so long as they are completely enclosed within an architecturally-compatible approved housing, comply with the height limit of the zoning district in which they are located, and do not extend more than ten feet above the roof or perimeter parapet wall if a parapet wall exists. 2. Installations on public water tanks and similar structures (e.g. storage tanks) that do not extend more than twelve feet above the tank. C. Within the General Business Open Business/Light-Industrial Industrial and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning districts, the following wireless communications facilities are conditional uses: 1. Stealth Design Wireless Communication Facilities that do not meet the limitations of 34(A)(3) above, and which do not exceed the height limit of the zoning district in which located. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2. Roof-top installations on flat-roofed non-residential buildings, so long as they comply with the following requirements: a. Setback. Antennas shall be mounted at least ten (10) feet from the closest exterior or parapet wall of a building or structure. (SE) b. Height. The height shall be measured from the top of the antenna to the roofline of the building or structure, or to the top elevation of the closest perimeter parapet wall if a parapet wall exists. The maximum height of the antenna is equal to half the distance the antenna is set back from such exterior wall or parapet wall, up to a maximum allowable height of twelve feet. c. Roof mounted antennas shall be constructed and/or colored to either appear white, light grey, or match the color of the wall above which they are located. (SE) 3. Distributed Antenna Systems and small cells that do not qualify for review under #3 or 4(A) above. D. Within the Wireless Communications Facility Overlay Zone, each of the above- listed options B, and C herein) shall be classified as permitted uses, regardless of the underlying zoning. In addition, the following conditional uses are established within the Wireless Communications Facility Overlay Zone: 1. Freestanding Wireless Communications Facility that has a total height equal to or less than the height specified for the particular subarea of the overlay. The subarea overlay locations, maximum heights, and method of measuring height are established as follows: Location: Maximum Height Height measured from: Beacon Hill Subarea 80 feet Existing grade. Road 2AB Subarea 110 feet Elevation of closest portion of Road 2AB. Beck Lake Subarea 80 feet Existing grade. Cottonwood Avenue Subarea 70 feet Elevation of closest portion of Big Horn Avenue. West Strip Subarea 70 feet Elevation of closest portion of Highway 14-16-20. * All heights are subject to compliance with City of Cody Code 7-3, Article II, Airport Obstruction Zoning. In addition to the standard conditional use criteria, the applicant must demonstrate that the proposed wireless communications facility is no taller than necessary to provide the desired coverage; provided, the Planning and Zoning Board may authorize a wireless communications facility taller than the minimum necessary when the facility is specifically designed and made available for co-location collocation at market rates as evidenced by a sworn affidavit, and the additional height does not significantly increase the visual impacts of the facility. The Board may require the applicant to provide visual simulations of the facility to assist them in determining visual impacts, and RF propagation maps to demonstrate coverage areas. E. Downtown Architectural District: Notwithstanding any language that may be interpreted otherwise, within the Downtown Architectural District only stealth- design wireless communications facilities that are architecturally integrated with buildings and structures may be permitted. F. Cell on Wheels: Temporary wireless communications facilities (e.g. cell on wheels) shall be subject to the same review procedures and requirements as more permanent towersfacilities; provided, in the case of failure of an existing wireless communications facility, a temporary facility of the same height as the damaged facility may be erected for up to 90 days at the site while repair/replacement activities are conducted, without the need for Planning and Zoning Board review. Unless otherwise permitted through a conditional use permit process, a temporary wireless communications facility is limited to eight months in duration, during any five-year ---PAGE BREAK--- period. The temporary facility shall not be located on the property except during the authorized period. 5. Tower Locations: A. Preferred Tower Locations. All new towers proposed to be located in any zoneing district are permitted only after application of the following siting priorities, ordered from most-preferred to least-preferred 1. City-owned or operated property and facilities not in the downtown architectural district or residential zones, and not including right-of-way; 2. The wireless communication facility overlay zone; 3. Industrial zones (HI, 4. Commercial zones (D-3, D-2, D-1 and D-4); 5. Other non-residential zones; 6. Parcels of land in residential zones that contain non-residential uses (e.g. schools and churches); 7. Residential properties in residential zones. 8. Designated historic structures or downtown zoning districts; 9. City rights-of-way. Upon request by the City, the applicant for a tower located in any zone shall address these preferences in an alternative sites analysis. B. Gap in Coverage or Capacity. Upon request by the City, the applicant shall demonstrate the following with a tower application: 1. A significant gap in the coverage, capacity, or technologies of the service network exists such that users are frequently unable to connect to the service network, or are regularly unable to maintain a connection, or are unable to achieve reliable wireless coverage within a building; 2. The gap can only be filled through an exception to one or more of the standards herein; and 3. The exception is narrowly tailored to fill the service gap such that the wireless communication facility conforms to the standards of this section to the greatest extent possible. C. Least Intrusive Means. For a new tower, the applicant, upon request by the City, must also demonstrate that the manner in which it proposes to fill the significant gap in coverage, capacity, or technologies of the service network is the least intrusive means on the values that these regulations seek to protect. D. Alternative Sites Analysis. For new towers, the applicant must address the City’s preferred tower locations with a detailed explanation justifying why a site of higher priority was not selected. When requested, the City’s tower location preferences must be addressed in a clear and complete written alternative sites analysis that shows at least three higher ranked, alternative sites considered that are in the geographic range of the service coverage objectives of the applicant, together with a factually detailed and meaningful comparative analysis between each alternative candidate and the proposed site that explains the substantive reasons why the applicant rejected the alternative candidate location(s). Alternative site analysis is not limited to locations within the City limits. 6. General standards: The following regulations apply to all wireless communications facilities in all zones and overlays, unless otherwise stated. A. Color. WCFs shall be placed and colored to blend into the architectural detail and coloring of the host structure. Support towers shall be painted a color that best allows it to blend into the surroundings. ---PAGE BREAK--- B. Building Codes; Safety Standards. To ensure the structural integrity of towers, the owner of a tower shall ensure that it is maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable state or local building codes and the applicable industry standards for towers, as amended from time to time. C. Notice. For purposes of this Chapter, any conditional use permit shall require notice to all property owners within a radius of the subject property equal to five times the total height of the facility above existing grade, in addition to any notice otherwise required by the City Code. D. Landscaping, Screening and Fencing. Applicant shall provide a landscaping, screening and fencing plan that shall meet with the approval of the reviewing official. E. Setbacks and Separation: 1. A freestanding wireless communications facility shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from the property line of a residential zone or the height of the tower, whichever is greater (SE), except when the facility is located in the Wireless Communications Facility Overlay Zone. New freestanding wireless communications facilities located in public utility substations shall be exempt from the above residential setback requirement if the wireless communications tower is no taller than the existing substation structures. 1. A freestanding wireless communications facility shall be set back a minimum of 75 feet from all City street rights-of-way, and 130 feet from any State highway rights-of-way. (Alleys are not considered streets.) (SE) Except as stated in and above, freestanding wireless communications facilities shall conform with the setback requirements of the zone in which located. (SE) F. Public Utility Colocation: When mounted on a transmission or sub-transmission line structure, the antenna shall not extend more than six feet above the top of the existing pole, subject to the applicable maximum height limitation of the zoning district, and any equipment cabinet(s) mounted on the structure shall be not more than 3 feet by 4 feet by 18 inches deep, with a minimum clearance of 10 feet above grade and a maximum height of 20 feet. G. Lighting and Signage: Only security lighting or lighting required by a state and/or federal agency is allowed, and provided the location of the lighting fixture together with its cut-off angle shall be such that it does not shine directly on any public right-of-way or any residential premises. The only signage that is permitted is that which is required by state or federal law. H. Abandonment: All wireless communications facilities which are not in use for six consecutive months shall be removed by the wireless communications facility owner. This removal shall take place within 120 days of the end of such six-month period. Upon removal, the site shall be revegetated or otherwise surfaced to blend with the existing surrounding area. If there is no vegetation on a wireless communications facility site, the site shall be returned to its preconstruction condition. The facility owner shall notify the city when removal of the facility occurs. Failure to remove an abandoned WCF within 120 days shall be grounds to remove the WCF at the owner's expense, including all costs and attorneys’ fees. If there are two or more users of a single tower, then this provision shall not become effective until all users cease using the tower. I. Interference: Every wireless communications facility shall meet the regulations of the Federal Communications Commission regarding physical and electromagnetic RF interference. J. Health Issues: Every wireless communications facility shall meet health and safety standards for electromagnetic field RF emissions as established by the Federal Communications Commission, and any other federal or state agency. Certification by a qualified Wyoming licensed engineer shall be submitted to verify such. 7. Co-locationCollocation: ---PAGE BREAK--- It is the policy of the City to minimize the number of wireless communication support towers and to encourage the collocation of antennas of more than one wireless communication service provider on a single support tower. Co-locations Collocations are encouraged, but shall be done in the least visibly- intrusive manner, considering available technology and coverage needs. Co-locations Collocations may be approved by the City Planner in conjunction with the building permit process and as noted in #14 below; provided if the planner is not clearly convinced that the “least visibly-intrusive manner” criterion is met, the matter may be referred to the Planning and Zoning Board for a determination on such. Federal preemptions for co-location are set forth in Section 6409(a) of Public Law 112- 96, Middle Class Tax Relief Act, February 22, 2012, codified at 47 U.S.C. 1455. Co- location does not include any project that: Involves more than a 10% increase in height, or new antennas that extend more than twenty feet from the tower, whichever is greater; Adds more than 4 equipment cabinets (or 1 shelter); or, Involves excavation outside of the current site boundaries. In matters of co-location, changes in height are to be measured from the dimension of the tower as originally installed or permitted, inclusive of any modifications that were approved prior to February 22, 2012. Colocation on a stealth wireless communications facility shall maintain the concealed nature of the facility. 8. Non-conforming wireless communications facilities: Non-conforming wireless communications facilities have the rights and restrictions outlined in Chapter 10-13 of the City code; provided, such facilities are subject to the 6- month abandonment provision noted in 4(D) above; any expansion is limited to the definition of a “co-locationcollocation” as set forth in hereinin the City Code; and, consideration of any expansion is based on the size of the facility as it existed on April 17, 2017. 9. Application Requirements: A. The community development department is authorized to create application form(s) and procedures as necessary to manage and enforce the provisions of this section. B. All applications shall include documentation establishing that the installer has permission from the structure owner and property owner to install the wireless communications antenna(s) and any associated buildings, cabinets or equipment at the site. 10. Independent Technical and Legal Review: The City may retain the services of independent experts of its choice to provide technical and legal evaluation of permit applications for WCFs, including administrative and conditional use permits. The applicant shall pay the cost for any independent consultant fees, along with applicable overhead recovery, through a deposit, estimated by the City, which is to be paid within ten (10) days of the City’s written request. 11. Application Fees: In connection with the filing of an application, the applicant shall pay all applicable application fees as required by the City. 12. Indemnification: ---PAGE BREAK--- Each permit issued shall be deemed to have as a condition of the permit a requirement that the applicant defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, employees, consultants, volunteers, and contractors from any and all liability, damages, or charges (including attorneys’ fees and expenses) arising out of claims, suits, demands, or causes of action as a result of the permit process, a granted permit, construction, erection, location, performance, operation, maintenance, repair, installation, replacement, removal, or restoration of the WCF. 13. Eligible Facilities Request: A. Purpose. This Section implements Section 6409(a) of the Spectrum Act, 47 U.S.C. Section 1455(a) as interpreted by the FCC in its Report and Order No. 14153, which requires a state or local government to approve any Eligible Facilities Request for a modification of an existing tower or base station that does not result in a substantial change to the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. Eligible Facilities Requests shall be governed solely by the provisions in this Section and Federal law. B. Application Review. 1. Upon receipt of a complete application for an Eligible Facilities Request pursuant to this Section, the City will review such application, make its final decision to approve or disapprove the application, and advise the applicant in writing of its final decision. 2. Within 60 days of the date on which an applicant submits a complete application seeking approval of an Eligible Facilities Request under this Section, the City will review and act upon the application, subject to the tolling provisions below. 3. The 60 day review period begins to run when the application is filed, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement between the City and the applicant, or in cases where the City determines that the application is incomplete. The timeframe for review is not tolled by a moratorium on the review of applications. To toll the timeframe for incompleteness, the City must provide written notice to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application. The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental submission in response to the City’s notice of incompleteness. Following a supplemental submission, the City will notify the applicant within 10 days if the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in this Section. Second or subsequent notices of incompleteness may not specify missing documents or information that was not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness. 4. In the event the City fails to approve or deny a complete application under this Section within the timeframe for review (accounting for any tolling), the request shall be deemed granted provided the applicant notifies the City in writing after the review period has expired. 14. Collocation Applications. A. Purpose. This Section implements, in part, 47 U.S.C. Section 332(c)(7) of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, as interpreted by the FCC in its Report and Order No. 14153. B. Application Review. 1. Upon receipt of a complete application for a collocation request pursuant to this Section, the City will review such application, make its final decision to approve or disapprove the application, and advise the applicant in writing of its final decision. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2. Within 90 days of the date on which an applicant submits a complete application seeking approval of a collocation request under this Section, the City will review and act upon the application, subject to the tolling provisions below. 3. The 90 day review period begins to run when the application is filed, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement between the City and the applicant, or in cases where the City determines that the application is incomplete. To toll the timeframe for incompleteness, the City must provide written notice to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application. The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental submission in response to the City’s notice of incompleteness. Following a supplemental submission, the City will notify the applicant within 10 days if the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in this Section. Second or subsequent notices of incompleteness may not specify missing documents or information that was not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness. 4. In the event the City fails to approve or deny a complete application under this Section within the timeframe for review (accounting for any tolling), the applicant shall be entitled to pursue all remedies under applicable law. 15. New Site or Tower Applications. A. Purpose. This Section also implements, in part, 47 U.S.C. Section 332(c)(7) of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, as interpreted by the FCC in its Report and Order No. 14153. B. Application Review. 1. Upon receipt of a complete application for a request for a new site or tower pursuant to this Section, the City will review such application, make its final decision to approve or disapprove the application, and advise the applicant in writing of its final decision. 2. Within 150 days of the date on which an applicant submits a complete application seeking approval of a request for a new site or tower under this Section, the City will review and act upon the application, subject to the tolling provisions below. 3. The 150 day review period begins to run when the application is filed, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement between the City and the applicant, or in cases where the City determines that the application is incomplete. To toll the timeframe for incompleteness, the City must provide written notice to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application. The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental submission in response to the City’s notice of incompleteness. Following a supplemental submission, the City will notify the applicant within 10 days if the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The timeframe is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in this Section. Second or subsequent notices of incompleteness may not specify missing documents or information that were not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness. 4. In the event the City fails to approve or deny a complete application under this Section within the timeframe for review (accounting for any tolling), the applicant shall be entitled to pursue all remedies under applicable law. H:\PLANNING DEPARTMENT\ORDINANCE\WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES ORD\UPDATED 4.6.2017\VERSIONS 4.11\CHAPTER 11_ORDINANCE TEXT.DOCX ---PAGE BREAK---