Full Text
SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-1 August 2013 9.24 TOWN OF SCIPIO This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Scipio. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Name: Mark Chamberlain Highway Supervisor Address: PO Box 71, Scipio Center, NY 13147 Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Fax Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email address: [EMAIL REDACTED] Name: Keith Batman, Town Supervisor Address: PO Box 71, Scipio Center, NY 13147 Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Fax Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email address: [EMAIL REDACTED] PROFILE Population According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the estimated Town of Scipio population was 1,713. The Town of Scipio is one of the 23 towns in Cayuga County. Location The Town of Scipio is located in south-central Cayuga County, sharing its eastern town line with the shores of Owasco Lake. It is bordered by the towns of Fleming to the north, Venice to the south, Ledyard to the southwest, and Springport to the northwest. Brief History Like many other towns in Cayuga County, Scipio was formed on land once reserved as part of the Central New York Military Tract, used to compensate veterans of the Revolutionary War. The first non-native settlements were made in the area around 1790. The town of Scipio was formed in 1794, named after the Roman General Scipio Africanus. The original town boundaries originally included the land areas of present-day towns of Sempronius, a part of Marcellus, Onondaga County, Ledyard, Venice, and part of Springport, all of which were separated between 1799 and 1823 (Town of Scipio, Date Unknown). Governing Body Format Home rule is strong in New York State and thus, each town and village has its own governing body. Towns are made up of a Town Board and Supervisor. Along with town and village roads, any public water and sewer systems are operated by the local municipality, though they may cooperate with County departments. Each municipality has charge over its own planning and zoning and uses the County personnel as a resource (Cayuga County, 2010). Growth/Development Trends The jurisdiction noted that there is no major residential/commercial development or major infrastructure development that has been identified for the next five years in the municipality. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-2 August 2013 New Development/Potential Development in Municipality Municipality Property Name Type (Residential or Commercial) Number of Structures Address Block and Lot Known Hazard Zone Description/Status Scipio Broadband Infrastructure Commercial Note: See Section I: Hazard Area Extent and Location for new development location information. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-3 August 2013 NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY Cayuga County has a history of natural hazard events as detailed in Volume I, Section 5 of this plan. A summary of historical events is provided in each of the hazard profiles and includes a chronology of events affecting the County and its municipalities. Below is presented a summary of historical events to indicate the range and impact of natural hazard events in the County. Specific damages have been indicated if available from reference or local sources. Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment Flood in Moravia 6/1/1905 Severely damaged Moravia business district Steamship Frontenac fire south of Union Springs 6/27/1907 8 deaths Severe Flooding along Cayuga Lake 4/1916 Spanish Influenza 1918 — 1919 nearly 100 deaths in Cayuga County Riots at Auburn Prison 1929 11 deaths, 3 firefighters injured Hislops fire in Auburn 12/1931 Destroyed a block of downtown, 1 firefighter killed Floods in Moravia & Locke 7/1/1935 Floods in Moravia & Locke Gasoline leak & explosion in Auburn 3/30/1960 Killed 5 including 3 firefighters Gasoline spill in Auburn 9/ 1960 17,000 gallon gasoline spill at Drake Oil Gasoline spill 5/1966 8,500 gallon gasoline spill at Sinclar bulk terminal in Auburn Dutch Elm Disease 1960's Kills thousands of trees in City and Villages Tropical Storm Agnes DR-338 Y – IA, PA 6/1972 Auburn's Mill Street dam washed out, Owasco Lake dam weakened, Cayuga Lake rises 1.25 feet higher than 1916 level High Winds/Wave Action/Flooding DR-367 Yes - IA, PA 3/21/1973 Gasoline tanker crash 4/10/1975 Resulting fire destroys 11 buildings in Locke Hurricane Eloise /Severe Storm, Heavy Rain, Landslide/Flooding DR-487 Yes - IA, PA 9/1975 Caused severe damage in Moravia and Locke 10,000 gallon gasoline spill at Agway in Auburn 9/11/1977 Ice Jam in Port Byron 2/1979 Evacuated homes and closes schools ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-4 August 2013 Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment Flooding in Moravia and Locke 10/1981 "worse than Agnes or Eloise" Radiation incident at Austeel (dental scrap) 1980's Blizzard followed by lake and river flooding in April EM-3107 Yes - PA 3/17/1993 Blizzard followed by lake and river flooding in April Dunn & McCarthy fire in Auburn. 11/1993 Ice jam flooding in Port Byron 1/ 1994 Evacuated homes and closes schools. County-wide flooding DR-1095 Yes - IA, PA 1/19/1996 1 death (MVA) Street flooding in Moravia and Locke DR-1148 No 11/1996 Tornado(s) in Niles and Moravia DR-1222 DR-1233 No Summer 1998 Labor Day storm. DR-1244 Yes - IA, PA 9/1998 USDA declared Drought (t40329). 8/1999 Genoa issues Emergency water restrictions Road flooding in King Ferry No 6/2000 (Fed. Declared disaster elsewhere). Flood 5/2002 Road flooding in Union Springs and Meridian. Landslide along Seneca River near Cross Lake in Town of Cato. 2/2003 Ice storm DR-1467 Yes - IA, PA 4/2003 3 deaths in Cayuga County. NE blackout. EM-3186 Yes - PA 8/23/2003 Snow emergency declared EM-3195 Yes - PA 1/2004 Rain/Flooding DR-1589 Yes - PA 4/2005 Flooding triggered by snow melt and rain. Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1650 No June 26 2006 — July 1, 2006 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1670 No November 16-17, 2006 April Nor'easter DR 1692 No April 18, 2007 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1710 No June 19, 2007 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1857 No August 9, 2009 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1993 No April 26, 2011— May 8, 2011 Severe Storms and Flooding EM 3328 No August 26, 2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-5 August 2013 Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment Hurricane Irene DR 4020 No August 26, 2011— September 5, 2011 Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straightline Winds EM 3341 No September 7-8, 2011 Remnants of Tropical Storm lee DR 4031 No September 7-11, 2011 Note: N/A = Not applicable ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-6 August 2013 NATURAL HAZARD RISK/VULNERABILITY RISK RANKING Hazard type Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses to Structures Vulnerable to the Hazard a, c Probability of Occurrence Risk Ranking Score (Probability x Impact) Hazard Ranking b Flood 1% Annual Chance: $92,682 Frequent 18 Medium 0.2% Annual Chance: $171,176 Severe Storm 100-Year MRP: $0 Frequent 18 Medium 500-Year MRP: $865 Annualized Loss: $150 Severe Winter Storm 1% of GBS: $708,392 Frequent 48 High 5% of GBS: $3,541,962 Transportation Not available Rare 6 Low Ground Failure Karst Exposure $0 Rare 6 Low Moderate Incidence $293,298 Moderate Susceptibility $0 a. Building damage ratio estimates based on FEMA 386-2 (August 2001) b. High = Total hazard priority risk ranking score of 30 and above Medium = Total hazard priority risk ranking of 15-29 Low = Total hazard risk ranking below 15 c. The valuation of general building stock and loss estimates was based on custom inventory for Cayuga County. d. Loss estimates for the severe storm and severe winter storm hazards are structural values only and do not include the value of contents. e. Loss estimates for the flood hazard represents both structure and contents. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-7 August 2013 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT This section identifies the following capabilities of the local jurisdiction: Legal and regulatory capability Administrative and technical capability Fiscal capability Community resiliency Community political capability Community classification. The town indicates that it has limited planning, regulatory, administrative, technical, fiscal, a high community resiliency and a moderate community political capability; with a very willing political capability to enact policies or programs to reduce hazard vulnerabilities in the community. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-8 August 2013 E.1) Legal and Regulatory Capability Regulatory Tools (Codes, Ordinances., Plans) Do you have this? (Y or N) Enforcement Authority Code Citation (Section, Paragraph, Page Number, Date of adoption) 1) Building Code Y Code Enforcement Officer NY Codes, 1/3/88 2) Zoning Ordinance Y Town of Scipio Zoning Laws, 1/1/90 3) Subdivision Ordinance Y Town of Scipio Zoning Laws, 1/1/90 4) NFIP Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Y Code Enforcement Officer Federal Flood Plan, 2/12/89 4a) Cumulative Substantial Damages 4b) Freeboard 5) Growth Management 6) Floodplain Management / Basin Plan 7) Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance 8) Comprehensive Plan / Master Plan/ General Plan Y Local 1/01 9) Capital Improvements Plan 10) Site Plan Review Requirements 11) Open Space Plan 12) Stream Corridor Management Plan 13) Watershed Management or Protection Plan 14) Economic Development Plan 15) Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan 16) Emergency Response Plan 17) Post Disaster Recovery Plan 18) Post Disaster Recovery Ordinance 19) Real Estate Disclosure Requirement State State Requirement 20) Other [Special Purpose Ordinances : Equipment Purchase Plan Y Local or County 2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-9 August 2013 E.2) Administrative and Technical Capability Staff/ Personnel Resources Available (Y or N) Department/ Agency/ Position 1) Planner(s) or Engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management practices N 2) Engineer(s) or Professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Y Code Enforcement Officer 3) Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards N 4) NFIP Floodplain Administrator 5) Surveyor(s) N 6) Personnel skilled or trained in “GIS” applications N 7) Scientist familiar with natural hazards N 8) Emergency Manager N 9) Grant Writer(s) N 10) Staff with expertise or training in benefit/cost analysis N E.3) Fiscal Capability Financial Resources Accessible or Eligible to use (Yes/No/Don’t know) 1) Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Don’t Know 2) Capital Improvements Project Funding Don’t Know 3) Authority to Levy Taxes for specific purposes Yes 4) User fees for water, sewer, gas or electric service Yes 5) Impact Fees for homebuyers or developers of new development/homes Don’t Know 6) Incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes 7) Incur debt through special tax bonds Yes 8) Incur debt through private activity bonds Don’t Know 9) Withhold public expenditures in hazard-prone areas Don’t Know 10) State mitigation grant programs (e.g. NYSDEC, NYCDEP) Don’t Know 11) Other ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-10 August 2013 E.4) Community Classifications Program Classification Date Classified Community Rating System (CRS) Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) Public Protection Storm Ready Firewise N/A = Not applicable. NP = Not participating. - = Unavailable. The classifications listed above relate to the community’s effectiveness in providing services that may impact it’s vulnerability to the natural hazards identified. These classifications can be viewed as a gauge of the community’s capabilities in all phases of emergency management (preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation) and are used as an underwriting parameter for determining the costs of various forms of insurance. The CRS class applies to flood insurance while the BCEGS and Public Protection classifications apply to standard property insurance. CRS classifications range on a scale of 1 to 10 with class one being the best possible classification, and class 10 representing no classification benefit. Firewise classifications include a higher classification when the subject property is located beyond 1000 feet of a creditable fire hydrant and is within 5 road miles of a recognized Fire Station. Criteria for classification credits are outlined in the following documents: The Community Rating System Coordinators Manual The Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule The ISO Mitigation online ISO’s Public Protection website at http://www.isomitigation.com/ppc/0000/ppc0001.html The National Weather Service Storm Ready website at http://www.weather.gov/stormready/howto.htm The National Firewise Communities website at http://firewise.org/ F. MITIGATION STRATEGY F.1) Past Mitigation Actions/Status The town has incorporated the following actions into its planning and land use mechanisms: Monitoring of closed landfill; and Planning to rewrite town zoning, land use, and related codes in 2013. F.2) Hazard Vulnerabilities Identified The jurisdiction did not identify any hazard problems and problem areas within the community. The Cayuga County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) has identified the following vulnerabilities for the Town of Scipio, and has proposed hazard mitigation initiatives corresponding to these vulnerabilities, as shown in Section F.3 of this annex: Crane Brook, a tributary that flows to the Seneca River, has been identified as having erosion issues. After heavy rainfall events, the swell of the stream erodes the banks and causes ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-11 August 2013 significant damage. As the banks deteriorate, cropland and other property is lost. The predominant land use adjacent to the watercourse is agriculture and residential. Streambank erosion is a primary concern, particularly during heavy rain events or during the spring melt. Great Gully Creek, a watercourse that flows to Cayuga Lake, has steeply sloped banks and runs through residential and agricultural areas. . After heavy rainfall events, the swell of the stream erodes the banks and causes significant damage. As the banks deteriorate, cropland is lost and property along the creek is endangered. Streambank erosion is a primary concern, particularly during heavy rain events or during the spring melt. Owasco Lake is a major Finger Lake located entirely within Cayuga County. It supplies drinking water to the City of Auburn and several towns within the county. Lake levels are controlled by the City of Auburn, however, in the event of a major storm, water levels could rise above normal stages and threaten lakeshore properties and homes. This could also head to contamination of the drinking water supply, as pollutants could overwhelm the water filtration plant’s capabilities. Land use in the area includes residential areas and agriculture. Recreation areas, steep slopes and certain beaches on parts of the lake may require stabilization. The Cayuga County SWCD has worked on many such projects on the lake in the past, as well as dredging in areas that have received heavy siltation. Big Salmon Creek, Little Salmon Creek and their tributaries have been evaluated for flooding and erosion concerns. Streambank erosion and woody debris have been identified as primary concerns along the stretch. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-12 August 2013 NFIP Summary Municipality # Policies # Claims (Losses) Total Loss Payments # Rep. Loss Prop. # Severe Rep. Loss Prop. # Polices in 100- year Boundary # Polices in 500- Boundary # Policies Outside the 500- year Flood Hazard Scipio 5 1 $6,596 0 0 0 0 5 Source: Policies, claims, repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss statistics provided by FEMA Region 2, in June 2012 using the “Comm_Name”. These statistics are current as of June, 2012. Please note the total number of repetitive loss properties includes the severe repetitive loss properties. Total building and content losses from the claims file provided by FEMA Region 2 (current as of June, 2012). The policy locations used are based on the latitude and longitude provided by FEMA Region 2. Town officials report that there are 3 policies in the 100-year boundary as of the date of publication. It is estimated that in the Town of Scipio, 7 residents live within the 1% annual chance flood area (NFIP Special Flood Hazard Area). Of the municipality's total land area, 7% is located within the 1% annual chance flood area. $288,644 of the municipality's general building stock replacement cost value (structure and contents) is located within the 1% annual chance flood area. There are 5 NFIP policies in the community. While there are 0 policies located within the 1% annual chance flood area, there are only policies issues to property owners in the 1% annual chance flood area. FEMA has identified 0 Repetitive Loss (RL) including 0 Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) properties in the municipality. HAZUS-MH estimates that for a 1% annual chance flood, $92,682 of the municipality's general building stock replacement cost value (structure and contents) will be damaged and 68 tons of debris could be generated. HAZUS-MH estimates no damage or loss of use to critical facilities in the community as a result of a 1% annual chance flood event. In some cases, a facility may be located in the DFIRM flood hazard boundary; however HAZUS did not calculate potential loss. This may be because the depth of flooding does not amount to any damages to the structure according to the depth damage function used in HAZUS for that facility type. Please refer to the Hazard Profiles for additional vulnerability information relevant to this jurisdiction. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-13 August 2013 F.3) PROPOSED HAZARD MITIGATION INITIATIVES Note some of the identified mitigation initiatives in Table F are dependent upon available funding (grants and local match availability) and may be modified or omitted at any time based on the occurrence of new hazard events and changes in municipal priorities. Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category SC-1 Monitoring of closed landfill N/A All 1-1 Town Low Low Town Ongoing Medium PP SC-2 Rewrite town zoning, land use, and related codes in 2013. New and Existing All 1-1 1-6 1-9 Town High Medium Town Short Term High PP SC-3 The Cayuga SWCD proposes to complete bank stabilization as needed along the Crane Brook watercourse. Protecting the banks from erosion and removing excess gravel and debris from the watercourse will allow the main flow of the water to remain in the channel. Enhancement of the floodplain will also lead to a reduction of damage during a major storm event. Significant losses to valuable agricultural land, forestland and property would be mitigated. Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga SWCD; NYSDEC; USACE; High High HMA grants, State, County, local funding Short Term DOF Medium NR SC-4 The Cayuga SWCD proposes to complete bank stabilization along a few reaches of the Great Gully Creek watercourse. Protecting the banks from erosion and removing excess gravel and debris from the watercourse will allow the main flow of the water to remain in the channel. Significant losses to valuable agricultural land, forestland and property would be mitigated. The reduction of soil loss would Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga SWCD; NYSDEC; USACE; High High HMA grants, State, County, local funding On-going DOF Medium NR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-14 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category also be beneficial for the water quality of Cayuga Lake as a result of the reduction of nutrient rich soil particles entering the Lake. SC-5 The Cayuga SWCD proposes to complete bank stabilization along the Owasco Lake lakeshore and throughout the immediate unnamed smaller tributaries that flow into the lake. as needed. The reduction of soil loss would also be beneficial for the water quality of Owasco Lake as a result of the reduction of nutrient rich soil particles entering the Lake. Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga SWCD; NYSDEC; USACE; High High HMA grants, State, County, local funding On-going DOF Medium NR SC-6 The Cayuga SWCD proposes to complete bank stabilization and clearing/snagging of debris jams from the channels of the Big Salmon Creek, Little Salmon Creek and their tributaries. Protecting the banks from erosion and removing excess gravel and debris from the watercourse will allow the main flow of the water to remain in the channel. Areas where improvements can be made to enhance the streams’ ability to reach its’ floodplain will also be investigated and potential projects proposed. Significant losses to valuable agricultural land, forestland and property would be mitigated. The reduction of soil loss would Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga SWCD; NYSDEC; USACE; High High HMA grants, State, County, local funding On-going DOF Medium NR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-15 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category also be beneficial for the water quality of Cayuga Lake as a result of the reduction of nutrient rich soil particles entering the Lake. SC-7 Conduct and facilitate community and public education and outreach for residents and businesses to include, but not be limited to, the following to promote and effect natural hazard risk reduction: Provide and maintain links to the HMP website, and regularly post notices on the County/municipal homepage(s) referencing the HMP webpages. Prepare and distribute informational letters to flood vulnerable property owners and neighborhood associations, explaining the availability of mitigation grant funding to mitigate their properties, and instructing them on how they can learn more and implement mitigation. Use email notification systems and newsletters to better educate the public on flood insurance, the availability of mitigation grant funding, and personal natural hazard risk N/A All Hazards 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 Municipality with support from Planning Partners, County Planning, NYSOEM, FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget, HMA programs with local or county match Short Term High PE ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-16 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category reduction measures. Work with neighborhood associations, civic and business groups to disseminate information on flood insurance and the availability of mitigation grant funding. SC-8 Incorporate ordinances and/or zoning restrictions to control and mitigate future development in hazard areas, specifically as identified in Section I. N/A All Hazards 1-6 4-3 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR SC-9 Improve communication systems. N/A All Hazards 3-3 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium ES PR SC-10 Develop programs/procedures to capture and archive loss data from events. Examples include: Record location and length of roadway closures; Develop a database of residential and commercial property damage, including permit history for such repairs; High water marks, perhaps painting phone poles with high water marks and or regulatory Base Flood Elevations (BFEs). N/A All Hazards 1-3 1-4 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR SC-11 Obtain and install backup power sources at critical facilities. N/A All Hazards 3-3 3-5 Municipality with support from County, Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium ES ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-17 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category NYSOEM and FEMA SC-12 Participate in local, county and/or state level projects and programs to develop improved structure and facility inventories and hazard datasets to support enhanced risk assessment efforts. Such programs may include developing a detailed inventory of critical facilities based upon FEMA’s Comprehensive Data Management System (CDMS) which could be used for various planning and emergency management purposes including: Support the performance of enhanced risk and vulnerability assessments for hazards of concern. Support state, county and local planning efforts including mitigation (including updates to the State HMP), comprehensive emergency management, debris management, and land use. Improved structural and facility inventories could incorporate flood, wind and seismic-specific parameters (e.g. first floor elevations, roof types, structure types based on FEMA-154 “Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards” N/A All Hazards 1-1 1-3 1-4 Hazard Mitigation Plan Coordinator Medium- High Medium-High FEMA Mitigation Grant Programs with local match Long Term DOF Medium PR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-18 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category methodologies). It is recognized that these programs will need to be initiated and supported at the County and/or State level, and will require training, tools and funding provided at the county, state and/or federal level. SC-13 Support ongoing updates of Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans New and Existing All Hazards 1-6 Municipality with support from County Emergency Management Low Low Municipal Budget On-going High PR SC-14 Create/Enhance/Maintain Mutual Aid agreements with neighboring communities for continuity of operations N/A All Hazards 3-2 3-5 3-6 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM, FEMA and surrounding communities Medium Low Municipal Budget Short Term High PR, ES SC-15 Identify and develop agreements with entities that can provide support with FEMA/SOEM paperwork after disasters; qualified damage assessment personnel – Improve post-disaster capabilities – damage assessment; FEMA/SOEM paperwork compilation, submissions, record- keeping N/A All Hazards 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Term Medium PR, ES SC-16 Work with regional agencies (i.e. County and NYSOEM) to help develop damage assessment capabilities at the local level through such things as training programs, certification of qualified individuals (e.g. code officials, floodplain managers, engineers). N/A All Hazards 3-6 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget, FEMA HMA and HLS grant programs Short- Long Term DOF Medium PR SC-17 Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, New and Existing All Hazards 3-1 3-5 Municipality with support High Low – High (for 5 year update) Municipal Budget, On-going High PR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-19 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Section 7.0 from Planning Partners, County Planning, NYSOEM, FEMA FEMA planning grants SC-18 Purchase, relocate, or elevate structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss property as priority. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates based on cost- effectiveness. Phase 2: Where determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of the determined action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability Existing Flood, Severe Storm 1-2 4-2 Municipality (via Municipal Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from County Planning, NYSOEM, FEMA High High FEMA Mitigation Grants Long Term DOF Medium PP SC-19 Maintain compliance with and good-standing in the NFIP including adoption and enforcement of floodplain management requirements (e.g. regulating all new and substantially improved construction in Special Hazard Flood Areas), floodplain identification and mapping, and flood insurance outreach to the community. Further, continue to meet and/or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and criteria through the following NFIP- N/A Flood, Severe Storm 1-4 1-6 1-7 4-3 Municipality (via Municipal Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from NYSOEM, FEMA High Low-Medium Municipal Budget Ongoing High PR, PE ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-20 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category related continued compliance actions identified as Initiatives below. SC-20 Obtain and archive elevation certificates N/A Flood, Severe Storm 1-4 1-6 NFIP Floodplain Administrator Medium Low Municipal Budget On-going High PR SC-21 Promote the participation of Floodplain Administrators within the planning process and other activities. N/A Flood 1-4 1-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR SC-22 Enhance the County/community resilience to severe storms (incl. severe winter storms) by joining the NOAA “Storm Ready” program and supporting communities in joining the program. N/A Severe Storm 1-4 1-6 2-2 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Low Municipal Budget Short Term DOF Medium PE SC-23 Adopt regulations for undergrounding utilities in new developments. N/A Severe Storm 1-6 3-1 Municipal Council Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR SC-24 Implement permit fee waivers for installation of backup power for private property. N/A Severe Storm 2-4 2-5 Municipal Council Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR SC-25 Provide public education and outreach on proper installation and/or use of backup power N/A Severe Storm 2-1 2-2 Municipal Clerk Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR SC-26 Implement, review, and enforce municipal policies and programs to prevent trees from threatening lives and impacting power availability/interruption. N/A Severe Storm 1-6 4-3 Municipal Code Enforcement Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR Notes: *Does this mitigation initiative reduce the effects of hazards on new and/or existing buildings and/or infrastructure? Not applicable (NA) is inserted if this does not apply. Acronyms and Abbreviations: ARC American Red Cross DPW Department of Public Works FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency HMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-21 August 2013 HMP Hazard Mitigation Proposal N/A Not applicable NFIP National Flood Insurance Program NYSOEM New York State Office of Emergency Management NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration SWCD Cayuga County Soil and Water Conservation District USACE U.S Army Corp of Engineers USGS U.S. Geological Survey Costs: Where actual project costs have been reasonably estimated: Low = < $10,000 Medium = $10,000 to $100,000 High = > $100,000 Where actual project costs cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Possible to fund under existing budget. Project is part of, or can be part of an existing on-going program. Medium = Could budget for under existing work-plan, but would require a reapportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. High = Would require an increase in revenue via an alternative source bonds, grants, fee increases) to implement. Existing funding levels are not adequate to cover the costs of the proposed project. Benefits: Where possible, an estimate of project benefits (per FEMA’s benefit calculation methodology) has been evaluated against the project costs, and is presented as: Low = < $10,000 Medium = $10,000 to $100,000 High = > $100,000 Where numerical project benefits cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Long term benefits of the project are difficult to quantify in the short term. Medium = Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure to property. High = Project will have an immediate impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property. Potential FEMA HMA Funding Sources: PDM = Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program FMA = Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program RFC = Repetitive Flood Claims Grant Program SRL = Severe Repetitive Loss Grant Program HMGP = Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Timeline: Short = 1 to 5 years. Long Term= 5 years or greater. OG = On-going program. DOF = Depending on funding. Notes (for Mitigation Type): 1. PP=Prevention and Property Protection: Government, administrative or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. These actions also include public activities to reduce hazard losses or actions that involve modification of existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-22 August 2013 removal of the structures from the hazard area. Examples include planning and zoning, floodplain local laws, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and storm water management regulations and acquisition, elevation, relocation, structural retrofits, storm shutters, and shatter-resistant glass. 2. PE=Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and school-age and adult education programs. 3. NR=Natural Resource Protection: Actions that minimize hazard loss and also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. 4. SP=Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, setback levees, floodwalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. 5. ES=Emergency Services: Actions that protect people and property, during and immediately following, a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response services, and the protection of essential facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-23 August 2013 PRIORITIZATION OF MITIGATION INITIATIVES Initiative # # of Objectives Met Benefits Costs Do Benefits equal or exceed Costs? (Yes or No) Is project Grant eligible? (Yes or No) Can Project be funded under existing programs/budgets? (Yes or No) Priority (High, Med., Low) SC-1 1 L L Y N Y M SC-2 3 H M Y N Y H SC-3 4 H H Y Y N M SC-4 4 H H Y Y N M SC-5 4 H H Y Y N M SC-6 4 H H Y Y N M SC-7 5 M M Y Y N H SC-8 2 M M Y Y Y M SC-9 2 M M Y Y Y M SC-10 2 M M Y Y Y M SC-11 2 M M Y Y Y M SC-12 3 M M Y Y N M SC-13 1 L L Y N Y H SC-14 4 M L Y N Y H SC-15 1 M M Y N Y M SC-16 2 M M Y Y N M SC-17 2 H L Y Y N H SC-18 2 H H Y Y N M SC-19 4 H L Y N Y H SC-20 2 M L Y N Y H SC-21 2 M M Y N Y M SC-22 3 M L Y N Y M SC-23 2 M L Y N Y H SC-24 2 M L Y N Y H SC-25 2 M L Y N Y H SC-26 2 M L Y N Y H Notes: H = High. L = Low. M = Medium. N = No. N/A = Not applicable. Y = Yes. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-24 August 2013 Explanation of Priorities High Priority = A project that meets multiple objectives multiple hazards), benefits exceeds cost, has funding secured or is an on-going project and project meets eligibility requirements for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) or Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM) programs. High priority projects can be completed in the short term (1 to 5 years). Medium Priority = A project that meets goals and objectives, benefits exceeds costs, funding has not been secured but project is grant eligible under, HMGP, PDM or other grant programs. Project can be completed in the short term, once funding is completed. Medium priority projects will become high priority projects once funding is secured. Low Priority = Any project that will mitigate the risk of a hazard, benefits do not exceed the costs or are difficult to quantify, funding has not been secured and project is not eligible for HMGP or PDM grant funding, and time line for completion is considered long term (1 to 10 years). Low priority projects may be eligible other sources of grant funding from other programs. A low priority project could become a high priority project once funding is secured as long as it could be completed in the short term. Prioritization of initiatives was based on above definitions: Yes Prioritization of initiatives was based on parameters other than stated above: Not applicable. FUTURE NEEDS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND RISK/VULNERABILITY No information at this time. HAZARD AREA EXTENT AND LOCATION A hazard area extent and location map has been generated for the jurisdiction to illustrate the probable areas impacted within the municipality and is provided on the next page. This map is based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this Plan, and is considered to be adequate for planning purposes. Maps have only been generated for those hazards that can be clearly identified using mapping techniques and technologies, and for which the jurisdiction has significant exposure. The Planning Area maps are provided in the hazard profiles within Section 5.4, Volume I of this Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-25 August 2013 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS No additional comments at this time. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.24: TOWN OF SCIPIO DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.24-26 August 2013 NFIP ADMINISTRATOR INPUT 1. Planning and Regulatory The Town of Scipio joined the NFIP on December 23, 1983, and is currently an active member of the NFIP. Current Flood Insurance Rate Maps have been in effect for the community since August 2, 2007. The Town of Scipio is proactive in floodplain management with ordinances meeting minimum requirements. 2. Administrative and Technical Staff The Town of Scipio has identified personnel to manage and uphold the Town of Scipio’s compliance with the NFIP, including Mike O'Connor, Code Enforcement Official and NFIP Administrator. 3. Financial As of June, 2012, there are 5 policies enforced within the Town of Scipio. Of the 5 insurance policies, 0 are within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), and 5 are located outside the SFHA. As of June, 2012, there have been zero repetitive loss properties and zero severe repetitive loss properties within the Town of Scipio. 4. Educational None at this time. 5. Actions to Strengthen the Program None at this time.