← Back to Cayugacounty Gov

Document cayugacounty_gov_doc_84cc92a8d6

Full Text

SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-1 August 2013 9.20 VILLAGE OF MORAVIA This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Village of Moravia. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Name: Anne Riddell , Village Clerk Address: P.O. Box 711, Moravia, NY 13118 Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Fax Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email address: [EMAIL REDACTED] Name: Gary Mulvaney , Mayor Address: P.O. Box 711, Moravia, NY 13118 Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Fax Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email address: [EMAIL REDACTED] PROFILE Population According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the estimated Village of Moravia population was 1,282. The Village of Moravia is one of the 9 villages in Cayuga County. Location The Village of Moravia is located at the south town line of the Town of Moravia, south of Owasco Lake. Brief History The Village of Moravia was the site of a native village before being settled as part of the Central New York Military Tract. The first settlers arrived around 1789, while the land was still part of Onondaga County and was referred to as the Owasco Flats. Cayuga County was formed in 1799, and that same year the Town of Sempronius was established to include the land of present-day Moravia. The Town of Moravia was set apart from Sempronius in 1833, and incorporated as an independent town in 1837. The Village of Moravia was incorporated in 1837 and re-incorporated in 1859 when enlarged (Scarry, 2008). Governing Body Format Home rule is strong in New York State and thus, each town and village has its own governing body. Towns are made up of a Town Board and Supervisor. The Villages all have a Village Mayor, Clerk, and Village Board. Along with town and village roads, any public water and sewer systems are operated by the local municipality, though they may cooperate with County departments. Each municipality has charge over its own planning and zoning and uses Cayuga County personnel as a resource (Cayuga County, 2010). Growth/Development Trends The jurisdiction noted that there is no major residential/commercial development or major infrastructure development that has been identified for the next five years in the municipality. Growth is limited by available space and flood zones. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-2 August 2013 NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY Cayuga County has a history of natural hazard events as detailed in Volume I, Section 5 of this plan. A summary of historical events is provided in each of the hazard profiles and includes a chronology of events affecting Cayuga County and its municipalities. Below is presented a summary of historical events to indicate the range and impact of natural hazard events in Cayuga County. Specific damages have been indicated if available from reference or local sources. Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment Flood in Moravia 6/1/1905 Severely damaged Moravia business district Steamship Frontenac fire south of Union Springs 6/27/1907 8 deaths Severe Flooding along Cayuga Lake 4/1916 Spanish Influenza 1918 — 1919 nearly 100 deaths in Cayuga County Riots at Auburn Prison 1929 11 deaths, 3 firefighters injured Hislops fire in Auburn 12/1931 Destroyed a block of downtown, 1 firefighter killed Floods in Moravia & Locke 7/1/1935 Floods in Moravia & Locke Gasoline leak & explosion in Auburn 3/30/1960 Killed 5 including 3 firefighters Gasoline spill in Auburn 9/ 1960 17,000 gallon gasoline spill at Drake Oil Gasoline spill 5/1966 8,500 gallon gasoline spill at Sinclar bulk terminal in Auburn Dutch Elm Disease 1960's Kills thousands of trees in City and Villages Tropical Storm Agnes DR-338 Y – IA, PA 6/1972 Auburn's Mill Street dam washed out, Owasco Lake dam weakened, Cayuga Lake rises 1.25 feet higher than 1916 level High Winds/Wave Action/Flooding DR-367 Yes - IA, PA 3/21/1973 Gasoline tanker crash 4/10/1975 Resulting fire destroys 11 buildings in Locke Hurricane Eloise /Severe Storm, Heavy Rain, Landslide/Flooding DR-487 Yes - IA, PA 9/1975 Caused severe damage in Moravia and Locke 10,000 gallon gasoline spill at Agway in Auburn 9/11/1977 Ice Jam in Port Byron 2/1979 Evacuated homes and closes ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-3 August 2013 Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment schools Flooding in Moravia and Locke 10/1981 "worse than Agnes or Eloise" Radiation incident at Austeel (dental scrap) 1980's Blizzard followed by lake and river flooding in April EM-3107 Yes - PA 3/17/1993 Blizzard followed by lake and river flooding in April Dunn & McCarthy fire in Auburn. 11/1993 Ice jam flooding in Port Byron 1/ 1994 Evacuated homes and closes schools. County-wide flooding DR-1095 Yes - IA, PA 1/19/1996 1 death (MVA) Street flooding in Moravia and Locke DR-1148 No 11/1996 Tornado(s) in Niles and Moravia DR-1222 DR-1233 No Summer 1998 Labor Day storm. DR-1244 Yes - IA, PA 9/1998 USDA declared Drought (t40329). 8/1999 Genoa issues Emergency water restrictions Road flooding in King Ferry No 6/2000 (Fed. Declared disaster elsewhere). Flood 5/2002 Road flooding in Union Springs and Meridian. Landslide along Seneca River near Cross Lake in Town of Cato. 2/2003 Ice storm DR-1467 Yes - IA, PA 4/2003 3 deaths in Cayuga County. NE blackout. EM-3186 Yes - PA 8/23/2003 Snow emergency declared EM-3195 Yes - PA 1/2004 Rain/Flooding DR-1589 Yes - PA 4/2005 Flooding triggered by snow melt and rain. Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1650 No June 26 2006 — July 1, 2006 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1670 No November 16-17, 2006 April Nor'easter DR 1692 No April 18, 2007 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1710 No June 19, 2007 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1857 No August 9, 2009 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1993 No April 26, 2011— May 8, 2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-4 August 2013 Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment Severe Storms and Flooding EM 3328 No August 26, 2011 Hurricane Irene DR 4020 No August 26, 2011— September 5, 2011 Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straightline Winds EM 3341 No September 7-8, 2011 Remnants of Tropical Storm lee DR 4031 No September 7-11, 2011 Note: N/A = Not applicable ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-5 August 2013 NATURAL HAZARD RISK/VULNERABILITY RISK RANKING Hazard type Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses to Structures Vulnerable to the Hazard a, c Probability of Occurrence Risk Ranking Score (Probability x Impact) Hazard Ranking b Flood 1% Annual Chance: $5,027,030 Frequent 48 High 0.2% Annual Chance: $7,881,622 Severe Storm 100-Year MRP: $0 Frequent 18 Medium 500-Year MRP: $95 Annualized Loss: $66 Severe Winter Storm 1% of GBS: $633,029 Frequent 48 High 5% of GBS: $3,165,143 Transportation Not available Rare 6 Low Ground Failure Karst Exposure $0 Rare 6 Low Moderate Incidence $0 Moderate Susceptibility $0 a. Building damage ratio estimates based on FEMA 386-2 (August 2001) b. High = Total hazard priority risk ranking score of 30 and above Medium = Total hazard priority risk ranking of 15-29 Low = Total hazard risk ranking below 15 c. The valuation of general building stock and loss estimates was based on custom inventory for Cayuga County. d. Loss estimates for the severe storm and severe winter storm hazards are structural values only and do not include the value of contents. e. Loss estimates for the flood hazard represents both structure and contents. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-6 August 2013 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT This section identifies the following capabilities of the local jurisdiction:  Legal and regulatory capability  Administrative and technical capability  Fiscal capability  Community resiliency  Community political capability  Community classification. The village indicates that it has limited fiscal, and moderate regulatory, administrative, technical, community resiliency, and community political capability; with a moderately willing political capability to enact policies or programs to reduce hazard vulnerabilities in the community. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-7 August 2013 E.1) Legal and Regulatory Capability Regulatory Tools (Codes, Ordinances., Plans) Do you have this? (Y or N) Enforcement Authority Code Citation (Section, Paragraph, Page Number, Date of adoption) 1) Building Code Y CEO 1/2007 2) Zoning Ordinance Y CEO 1/1988 3) Subdivision Ordinance Y Planning Board 5/1996 4) NFIP Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Y CEO 1/2007 4a) Cumulative Substantial Damages N 4b) Freeboard N 5) Growth Management N 6) Floodplain Management / Basin Plan Y CEO 1/2007 7) Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance N 8) Comprehensive Plan / Master Plan/ General Plan Y Planning Board 2/1965 9) Capital Improvements Plan N 10) Site Plan Review Requirements N 11) Open Space Plan N 12) Stream Corridor Management Plan Y NYDEC 13) Watershed Management or Protection Plan Y County 14) Economic Development Plan N 15) Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Y Board of Trustees 3/2012 16) Emergency Response Plan Y Board of Trustees 3/2012 17) Post Disaster Recovery Plan Y County 18) Post Disaster Recovery Ordinance N 19) Real Estate Disclosure Requirement Y Village Clerk FEMA CRS Requirement 3/2013 20) Other [Special Purpose Ordinances critical or sensitive areas)] N ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-8 August 2013 E.2) Administrative and Technical Capability Staff/ Personnel Resources Available (Y or N) Department/ Agency/ Position 1) Planner(s) or Engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management practices N 2) Engineer(s) or Professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure N 3) Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards N 4) NFIP Floodplain Administrator Y Code Enforcement 5) Surveyor(s) N 6) Personnel skilled or trained in “GIS” applications N 7) Scientist familiar with natural hazards N 8) Emergency Manager N 9) Grant Writer(s) N 10) Staff with expertise or training in benefit/cost analysis N E.3) Fiscal Capability Financial Resources Accessible or Eligible to use (Yes/No/Don’t know) 1) Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Y 2) Capital Improvements Project Funding Y 3) Authority to Levy Taxes for specific purposes Y 4) User fees for water, sewer, gas or electric service N 5) Impact Fees for homebuyers or developers of new development/homes N 6) Incur debt through general obligation bonds N 7) Incur debt through special tax bonds N 8) Incur debt through private activity bonds N 9) Withhold public expenditures in hazard-prone areas N 10) State mitigation grant programs (e.g. NYSDEC, NYCDEP) Y 11) Other ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-9 August 2013 E.4) Community Classifications Program Classification Date Classified Community Rating System (CRS) 8 9/2012 Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) 3/2008 Public Protection NP Storm Ready - Firewise NP N/A = Not applicable. NP = Not participating. - = Unavailable.*= 1 and 2 Family Residential. **=Commercial and Industrial The classifications listed above relate to the community’s effectiveness in providing services that may impact it’s vulnerability to the natural hazards identified. These classifications can be viewed as a gauge of the community’s capabilities in all phases of emergency management (preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation) and are used as an underwriting parameter for determining the costs of various forms of insurance. The CRS class applies to flood insurance while the BCEGS and Public Protection classifications apply to standard property insurance. CRS classifications range on a scale of 1 to 10 with class one being the best possible classification, and class 10 representing no classification benefit. Firewise classifications include a higher classification when the subject property is located beyond 1000 feet of a creditable fire hydrant and is within 5 road miles of a recognized Fire Station. Criteria for classification credits are outlined in the following documents:  The Community Rating System Coordinators Manual  The Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule  The ISO Mitigation online ISO’s Public Protection website at http://www.isomitigation.com/ppc/0000/ppc0001.html  The National Weather Service Storm Ready website at http://www.weather.gov/stormready/howto.htm  The National Firewise Communities website at http://firewise.org/ F. MITIGATION STRATEGY F.1) Past Mitigation Actions/Status The village has completed the following mitigation actions:  Dredging of Owasco Inlet by Cayuga County and State.  Recently, the village completed a stormwater mitigation plan on West Ave. with the assistance of Cayuga County.  The Town installed retention ponds to reduce flood of water into the village from Skinner Hill. In the course of their routine administration, the village continues to support the following mitigation actions or programs:  Conducts and facilitate community and public education and outreach for residents and businesses to include, but not be limited to, the following to promote and effect natural hazard risk reduction: ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-10 August 2013 o Provide and maintain links to the HMP website, and regularly post notices on Cayuga County/municipal homepage(s) referencing the HMP webpages. o Prepare and distribute informational letters to flood vulnerable property owners and neighborhood associations, explaining the availability of mitigation grant funding to mitigate their properties, and instructing them on how they can learn more and implement mitigation. o Use email notification systems and newsletters to better educate the public on flood insurance, the availability of mitigation grant funding, and personal natural hazard risk reduction measures.  Works with neighborhood associations, civic and business groups to disseminate information on flood insurance and the availability of mitigation grant funding.  Supports ongoing updates of Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans  Maintains compliance with and good-standing in the NFIP, including adoption and enforcement of floodplain management requirements (e.g. regulating all new and substantially improved construction in Special Hazard Flood Areas), floodplain identification and mapping, and flood insurance outreach to the community. Further, the village continues to meet and/or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and criteria through the following NFIP-related continued compliance actions identified as Initiatives below.  Obtains and archives elevation certificates  Continues to promote the participation of Floodplain Administrators within the planning process and other activities. F.2) Hazard Vulnerabilities Identified The village identified the following hazard problems and problem areas within the community:  Areas are prone to flooding in the Owasco Flats west of Main St on Aurora, W. Cayuga Streets.  Flooding occurs in the area near the villages’ wastewater treatment plant.  Senior citizen housing along  South Main Street floodwater, stormwater diversion project. Village officials reported recent stormwater run-off and flooding issues at the north end of the village from Oak Hill Road down onto North Main Street. There are culverts, however the road and the storm drains are owned by Cayuga County. Any retention areas and other culverts are all on and owned by private property owners. Due to this, the Village has little or no authority or funds to remediate this storm water run-off. Our hopes would be to work with Cayuga County and the property owners in the future to possibly relieve some of this run-off. The Cayuga County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) has identified the following vulnerabilities for the Village of Moravia, and has proposed hazard mitigation initiatives corresponding to these vulnerabilities, as shown in Section F.3 of this annex:  Owasco Lake is a major Finger Lake located entirely within Cayuga County. It supplies drinking water to the City of Auburn and several towns within Cayuga County. Lake levels are controlled by the City of Auburn. However, in the event of a major storm, water levels could rise above normal stages and threaten lakeshore properties and homes. This could also head to contamination of the drinking water supply, as pollutants could overwhelm the water filtration plant’s capabilities. Land use in the area includes residential areas and agriculture. Recreation areas, steep slopes and certain beaches on parts of the lake may require stabilization. The Cayuga County SWCD has worked on many such projects on the lake in the past, as well as dredging in areas that have received heavy siltation. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-11 August 2013  The Village of Moravia is a low-lying village with several streams and watercourses flowing through it, coming down from steep slopes above. Historically, the village has experienced flooding from snowmelt and storm events. In some cases, road culverts have become plugged with debris from upstream. The village storm sewers are not adequate to handle excessive amounts of stormwater. Erosion from steambanks often leads to silt deposits in the flat areas in the village, reducing stream channels even further. Debris carried into the village also creates logjams and flooding. The Cayuga County SWCD has worked with the Village in the past to address some of these issues, however, lack of funds has limited the projects. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-12 August 2013 NFIP Summary Municipality # Policies # Claims (Losses) Total Loss Payments # Rep. Loss Prop. # Severe Rep. Loss Prop. # Polices in 100- year Boundary # Polices in 500- Boundary # Policies Outside the 500- year Flood Hazard Moravia 121 16 $76,025 0 0 114 3 4 Source: Policies, claims, repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss statistics provided by FEMA Region 2, in June 2012 using the “Comm_Name”. These statistics are current as of June, 2012. Please note the total number of repetitive loss properties includes the severe repetitive loss properties. Total building and content losses from the claims file provided by FEMA Region 2 (current as of June, 2012). The policy locations used are based on the latitude and longitude provided by FEMA Region 2. It is estimated that in the Village of Moravia, 519 residents live within the 1% annual chance flood area (NFIP Special Flood Hazard Area). Of the municipality's total land area, 40.7% is located within the 1% annual chance flood area. $44,792,262 (40.6%) of the municipality's general building stock replacement cost value (structure and contents) is located within the 1% annual chance flood area. There are 121 NFIP policies in the community. While there are 114 policies located within the 1% annual chance flood area, there are only policies issues to property owners in the 1% annual chance flood area. FEMA has identified 0 Repetitive Loss (RL) including 0 Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) properties in the municipality. HAZUS-MH estimates that for a 1% annual chance flood, $5,027,030 of the municipality's general building stock replacement cost value (structure and contents) will be damaged and 351 tons of debris could be generated. HAZUS-MH estimates the following damage and loss of use to critical facilities in the community as a result of a 1% annual chance flood event: Critical Facilities Located in the 1-Percent and 0.2-Percent Annual Chance Flood Boundaries and Estimated Potential Damage Name Municipality Type Exposure Potential Loss from 1% Flood Event Potential Loss from 0.2% Flood Event 1% Zone 0.2% Zone Percent Structure Damage Percent Content Damage Days to 100- Percent(1) Percent Structure Damage Percent Content Damage Days to 100- Percent(1) Four Town First Aid Squad, Inc. Moravia Fire X Village Office Moravia Municipal Hall X Village of Moravia Moravia Highway Department X Moravia Moravia Electric Substation X Moravia Justice Center Moravia Police X Moravia Sewage Plant Moravia WWTF X ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-13 August 2013 Name Municipality Type Exposure Potential Loss from 1% Flood Event Potential Loss from 0.2% Flood Event 1% Zone 0.2% Zone Percent Structure Damage Percent Content Damage Days to 100- Percent(1) Percent Structure Damage Percent Content Damage Days to 100- Percent(1) Court Moravia Senior X 15 86.1 NA 16.43 95.3 NA Northwoods Moravia Senior X 15.31 89.86 NA 16.32 94.95 NA Village of Moravia Moravia Highway Department X 63 78 NA 63.82 78.82 NA Well #4 & Treatment Plant Moravia Potable Water X Source: HAZUS-MH 2.1 Note: C = City; NA = Not available; T = Town; V = Village X = Facility located within the DFIRM boundary. HAZUS-MH 2.1 provides a general indication of the maximum restoration time for 100% operations. Clearly, a great deal of effort is needed to quickly restore essential facilities to full functionality; therefore this will be an indication of the maximum downtime (HAZUS-MH 2.1 User Manual). In some cases, a facility may be located in the DFIRM flood hazard boundary; however HAZUS did not calculate potential loss. This may be because the depth of flooding does not amount to any damages to the structure according to the depth damage function used in HAZUS for that facility type. The flood model does not estimate damages for HAZMAT facilities. With regards to the vulnerable critical facilities identified in the table above, village officials provided the following information:  The Village Justice Center is a new facility and was built up above flood elevation when constructed.  The Moravia Sewage Plant is a multi-million dollar facility, so relocating it would not be considered.  The Electric Substation is owned by NYSEG, so the Village of Moravia has no authority over relocating it. Please refer to the Hazard Profiles for additional vulnerability information relevant to this jurisdiction. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-14 August 2013 F.3) PROPOSED HAZARD MITIGATION INITIATIVES Note some of the identified mitigation initiatives in Table F are dependent upon available funding (grants and local match availability) and may be modified or omitted at any time based on the occurrence of new hazard events and changes in municipal priorities. Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category MV-1 Add berms along Mill Stream west of Rt. 38 Bridge (Senior Citizens Housing). Existing Flood 1-1 3-4 Municipal Public Works Medium Medium Federal, State, County DOT Grants Short Term DOF Medium SP MV-2 Dredge the Owasco Inlet – project led by Cayuga County and the State. N/A Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 NYSDEC, County, municipal High High Federal, State, County grant opportunities Short Term DOF High NR MV-3 The Cayuga SWCD proposes to complete bank stabilization along the Owasco lakeshore and throughout the immediate unnamed smaller tributaries that flow into the lake, as needed. The reduction of soil loss would also be beneficial for the water quality of Owasco Lake as a result of the reduction of nutrient rich soil particles entering the Lake. Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga SWCD; NYSDEC; USACE; High High HMA grants, State, County, local funding On-going DOF High NR MV-4 The Cayuga SWCD proposes to complete bank stabilization and clearing/ snagging of debris jams in the several streams and watercourses flowing through the Village. Protecting the banks from erosion and removing excess gravel and debris Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga SWCD; NYSDEC; USACE; County Highway Dept, Village DPW High High HMA grants, State, County, local funding Short Term DOF High NR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-15 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category from the watercourses will allow the main flow of the water to remain in the channels. The SWCD will also work with the Village DPW and County Highway to properly size culverts and improve the storm sewers. MV-5 Work with Cayuga County and the property owners at the north end of the village, from Oak Hill Road down onto North Main Street, to relieve/ remediate storm water run- off problems. Both Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga County Highway Dept, Village DPW, Local Property Owners M-H L-M HMA grants, County, local funding County, local funding M NR MV-6 Remove the old LVRR bridge of Grove Street to reduce flood risk to dozens of homes, the senior housing complex, and the business district. Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga County Highway Dept, Village DPW Medium Medium County, local funding County, local funding M PP MV-7 Incorporate ordinances and/or zoning restrictions to control and mitigate future development in hazard areas, specifically as identified in Section I. N/A All Hazards 1-6 4-3 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR MV-8 Improve communication systems. N/A All Hazards 3-3 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium ES PR MV-9 Develop programs/procedures to capture and archive loss data from events. Examples include:  Record location and length of roadway closures;  Develop a database of residential and N/A All Hazards 1-3 1-4 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-16 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category commercial property damage, including permit history for such repairs;  High water marks, perhaps painting phone poles with high water marks and or regulatory Base Flood Elevations (BFEs). MV-10 Create/Enhance/Maintain Mutual Aid agreements with neighboring communities for continuity of operations N/A All Hazards 3-2 3-5 3-6 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM, FEMA and surrounding communities Medium Low Municipal Budget Short Term High PR, ES MV-11 Identify and develop agreements with entities that can provide support with FEMA/SOEM paperwork after disasters; qualified damage assessment personnel – Improve post-disaster capabilities – damage assessment; FEMA/SOEM paperwork compilation, submissions, record-keeping N/A All Hazards 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Term Medium PR, ES MV-12 Work with regional agencies (i.e. County and NYSOEM) to help develop damage assessment capabilities at the local level through such things as training programs, certification of qualified individuals (e.g. code officials, floodplain managers, engineers). N/A All Hazards 3-6 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget, FEMA HMA and HLS grant programs Short- Long Term DOF Medium PR MV-13 Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Section 7.0 New and Existing All Hazards 3-1 3-5 Municipality with support from Planning Partners, County Planning, NYSOEM, FEMA High Low – High (for 5 year update) Municipal Budget, FEMA planning grants On-going High PR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-17 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category MV-14 Enhance Cayuga County/community resilience to severe storms (incl. severe winter storms) by joining the NOAA “Storm Ready” program and supporting communities in joining the program. N/A Severe Storm 1-4 1-6 2-2 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Low Municipal Budget Short Term DOF Medium PE MV-15 Implement, review, and enforce municipal policies and programs to prevent trees from threatening lives and impacting power availability/interruption. N/A Severe Storm 1-6 4-3 Municipal Code Enforcement Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR Notes: *Does this mitigation initiative reduce the effects of hazards on new and/or existing buildings and/or infrastructure? Not applicable (NA) is inserted if this does not apply. Acronyms and Abbreviations: ARC American Red Cross DPW Department of Public Works FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency HMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance HMP Hazard Mitigation Proposal N/A Not applicable NFIP National Flood Insurance Program NYSOEM New York State Office of Emergency Management NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration SWCD Cayuga County Soil and Water Conservation District USACE U.S Army Corp of Engineers USGS U.S. Geological Survey Costs: Where actual project costs have been reasonably estimated: Low = < $10,000 Medium = $10,000 to $100,000 High = > $100,000 Where actual project costs cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Possible to fund under existing budget. Project is part of, or can be part of an existing on-going program. Medium = Could budget for under existing work-plan, but would require a reapportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. High = Would require an increase in revenue via an alternative source bonds, grants, fee increases) to implement. Existing funding levels are not adequate to cover the costs of the proposed project. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-18 August 2013 Benefits: Where possible, an estimate of project benefits (per FEMA’s benefit calculation methodology) has been evaluated against the project costs, and is presented as: Low = < $10,000 Medium = $10,000 to $100,000 High = > $100,000 Where numerical project benefits cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Long term benefits of the project are difficult to quantify in the short term. Medium = Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure to property. High = Project will have an immediate impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property. Potential FEMA HMA Funding Sources: PDM = Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program FMA = Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program RFC = Repetitive Flood Claims Grant Program SRL = Severe Repetitive Loss Grant Program HMGP = Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Timeline: Short = 1 to 5 years. Long Term= 5 years or greater. OG = On-going program. DOF = Depending on funding. Notes (for Mitigation Type): 1. PR=Prevention: Government, administrative or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built Examples of these are acquisition, elevation, relocation, structural retrofits, storm shutters, and shatter-resistant glass. 2. PP= Property Protection: These actions also include public activities to reduce hazard losses or actions that involve modification of existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or removal of the structures from the hazard area. Examples include planning and zoning, floodplain local laws, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and storm water management regulations. 3. PE=Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and school-age and adult education programs. 4. NR=Natural Resource Protection: Actions that minimize hazard loss and also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. 5. SP=Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, setback levees, floodwalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. 6. ES=Emergency Services: Actions that protect people and property, during and immediately following, a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response services, and the protection of essential facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-19 August 2013 PRIORITIZATION OF MITIGATION INITIATIVES Initiative # # of Objectives Met Benefits Costs Do Benefits equal or exceed Costs? (Yes or No) Is project Grant eligible? (Yes or No) Can Project be funded under existing programs/budgets? (Yes or No) Priority (High, Med., Low) MV-1 2 M M Y Y N M MV-2 4 H H Y Y N H MV-3 4 H H Y Y N H MV-4 4 H H Y Y N H MV-5 4 M-H L-M Y N Y M MV-6 4 M M Y N N M MV-7 2 M M Y Y Y M MV-8 2 M M Y Y Y M MV-9 2 M M Y Y Y M MV-10 4 M L Y N Y H MV-11 1 M M Y N Y M MV-12 2 M M Y Y N M MV-13 2 H L Y Y N H MV-14 3 M L Y N Y M MV-15 2 M L Y N Y H Notes: H = High. L = Low. M = Medium. N = No. N/A = Not applicable. Y = Yes. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-20 August 2013 Explanation of Priorities High Priority = A project that meets multiple objectives multiple hazards), benefits exceeds cost, has funding secured or is an on-going project and project meets eligibility requirements for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) or Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM) programs. High priority projects can be completed in the short term (1 to 5 years). Medium Priority = A project that meets goals and objectives, benefits exceeds costs, funding has not been secured but project is grant eligible under, HMGP, PDM or other grant programs. Project can be completed in the short term, once funding is completed. Medium priority projects will become high priority projects once funding is secured. Low Priority = Any project that will mitigate the risk of a hazard, benefits do not exceed the costs or are difficult to quantify, funding has not been secured and project is not eligible for HMGP or PDM grant funding, and time line for completion is considered long term (1 to 10 years). Low priority projects may be eligible other sources of grant funding from other programs. A low priority project could become a high priority project once funding is secured as long as it could be completed in the short term. Prioritization of initiatives was based on above definitions: Yes Prioritization of initiatives was based on parameters other than stated above: Not applicable. FUTURE NEEDS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND RISK/VULNERABILITY HAZARD AREA EXTENT AND LOCATION A hazard area extent and location map has been generated for the jurisdiction to illustrate the probable areas impacted within the municipality and is provided on the next page. This map is based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this Plan, and is considered to be adequate for planning purposes. Maps have only been generated for those hazards that can be clearly identified using mapping techniques and technologies, and for which the jurisdiction has significant exposure. The Planning Area maps are provided in the hazard profiles within Section 5.4, Volume I of this Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-21 August 2013 Figure 9.2-1. Village of Moravia Hazard Area Extent and Location Map Sources: FEMA, 2011 Notes: NFIP = National Flood Insurance Program. RL = Repetitive Loss. SRL = Severe Repetitive Loss. The entire municipality is vulnerable to the following hazards: drought, earthquake, severe storm, and severe winter storm. MV-1 MV-4 MV-2 MV-3 MV-4 MV-5 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.20: VILLAGE OF MORAVIA DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan –Cayuga County, New York 9.20-22 August 2013 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS No additional comments at this time. NFIP ADMINISTRATOR INPUT 1. Planning and Regulatory The Village of Moravia joined the NFIP on June 4, 1975, and is currently an active member of the NFIP. Flood Insurance Rate Maps have been in effect for the community since September 30, 1982. The Village of Moravia is proactive in floodplain management with ordinances meeting minimum requirements. The Village of Moravia has completed Community Assistance Visits (CAV), with the most recent visit completed on March 17, 2013. As of December 2012 there is no need for a CAV. The Village of Moravia has no outstanding compliance issues. 2. Administrative and Technical Staff The Village of Moravia has identified personnel to manage and uphold the Village of Moravia’s compliance with the NFIP. Dedicated staff include: Code Enforcement Officer (Local Administrator) and the Village Clerk. Staff members (both dedicated and supplementary) complete numerous tasks in order for the Village of Moravia to be in compliance of NFIP standards. Tasks include permit reviews, building inspections, and CRS participation. 3. Financial As of February, 2013 there are 129 of policies enforced within the Village of Moravia. Of the 129 insurance policies, 103 are within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), and 26 are located outside the SFHA. Repetitive loss insurance claims have been reported in one area within the Village of Moravia including. As of February 11, 2013 there has been one repetitive loss property within the Village of Moravia. 4. Educational The Village of Moravia conducts numerous educational and/or outreach activities related to the NFIP. Activities include flood safe building practices, availability of flood insurance, and newsletters/brochures distributed throughout the year as part of the Community Rating System (CRS). The Village of Moravia’s CRS ranking is 5. Actions to Strengthen the Program The Village of Moravia has taken numerous steps to strengthen the NFIP program and its administration. Actions include participation of the Community Rating System (CRS).