Full Text
SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-1 August 2013 9.26 TOWN OF SENNETT This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Sennett. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Name: Kris LaPointe, Highway Department Address: 6931 Cherry Street Auburn, New York 13021 Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] ext#2; [PHONE REDACTED]- cell Fax Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email address: [EMAIL REDACTED] Name: Jeff Herrick, Town Supervisor Address: 6931 Cherry Street Auburn, New York 13021 Phone Number: 253-3912 ext#8 Fax Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email address: PROFILE Population According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the estimated Town of Sennett population was 3,595. The Town of Sennett is one of the 23 towns in Cayuga County. Location The Town of Sennett is located in east-central Cayuga County, sharing its eastern border with Onondaga County. The town is located north of the Town of Owasco, northeast of the City of Auburn, east of the Town of Throop, and south of the Town of Brutus. Brief History Like many Cayuga County towns, the land of Sennett was originally part of the Central New York Military Tract, and reserved for veterans of the Revolutionary War. The area was first settled in 1795, on land that soon became part of the towns of Brutus and Aurelius. Sennett was formed in 1827 on land split form those two towns, named after a public official and early settler, Daniel Sennett. In 1859, Sennett released some of its land for to form the Town of Throop. More land was released later for forming the City of Auburn (Town of Sennett, Date Unknown). Governing Body Format Home rule is strong in New York State and thus, each town and village has its own governing body. Towns are made up of a Town Board and Supervisor. Along with town and village roads, any public water and sewer systems are operated by the local municipality, though they may cooperate with County departments. Each municipality has charge over its own planning and zoning and uses the County personnel as a resource (Cayuga County, 2010). Growth/Development Trends The following table summarizes major residential/commercial development and major infrastructure development that are identified for the next five years in the municipality. Refer to the map in section of this annex which illustrates the hazard areas along with the location of potential new development. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-2 August 2013 New Development/Potential Development in Municipality Property Name Type (Residential or Commercial) Number of Structures Address Quincy Hill Phase 2 residential 36 U.S.Route 20 Note: Please refer to Section I for new development location information. NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY Cayuga County has a history of natural hazard events as detailed in Volume I, Section 5 of this plan. A summary of historical events is provided in each of the hazard profiles and includes a chronology of events affecting the County and its municipalities. Below is presented a summary of historical events to indicate the range and impact of natural hazard events in the County. Specific damages have been indicated if available from reference or local sources. Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment Flood in Moravia 6/1/1905 Severely damaged Moravia business district Steamship Frontenac fire south of Union Springs 6/27/1907 8 deaths Severe Flooding along Cayuga Lake 4/1916 Spanish Influenza 1918 — 1919 nearly 100 deaths in Cayuga County Riots at Auburn Prison 1929 11 deaths, 3 firefighters injured Hislops fire in Auburn 12/1931 Destroyed a block of downtown, 1 firefighter killed Floods in Moravia & Locke 7/1/1935 Floods in Moravia & Locke Gasoline leak & explosion in Auburn 3/30/1960 Killed 5 including 3 firefighters Gasoline spill in Auburn 9/ 1960 17,000 gallon gasoline spill at Drake Oil Gasoline spill 5/1966 8,500 gallon gasoline spill at Sinclar bulk terminal in Auburn Dutch Elm Disease 1960's Kills thousands of trees in City and Villages Tropical Storm Agnes DR-338 Y – IA, PA 6/1972 Auburn's Mill Street dam washed out, Owasco Lake dam weakened, Cayuga Lake rises 1.25 feet higher than 1916 level High Winds/Wave Action/Flooding DR-367 Yes - IA, PA 3/21/1973 Gasoline tanker crash 4/10/1975 Resulting fire destroys 11 buildings in Locke ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-3 August 2013 Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment Hurricane Eloise /Severe Storm, Heavy Rain, Landslide/Flooding DR-487 Yes - IA, PA 9/1975 Caused severe damage in Moravia and Locke 10,000 gallon gasoline spill at Agway in Auburn 9/11/1977 Ice Jam in Port Byron 2/1979 Evacuated homes and closes schools Flooding in Moravia and Locke 10/1981 "worse than Agnes or Eloise" Radiation incident at Austeel (dental scrap) 1980's Blizzard followed by lake and river flooding in April EM-3107 Yes - PA 3/17/1993 Blizzard followed by lake and river flooding in April Dunn & McCarthy fire in Auburn. 11/1993 Ice jam flooding in Port Byron 1/ 1994 Evacuated homes and closes schools. County-wide flooding DR-1095 Yes - IA, PA 1/19/1996 1 death (MVA) Street flooding in Moravia and Locke DR-1148 No 11/1996 Tornado(s) in Niles and Moravia DR-1222 DR-1233 No Summer 1998 Labor Day storm. DR-1244 Yes - IA, PA 9/1998 USDA declared Drought (t40329). 8/1999 Genoa issues Emergency water restrictions Road flooding in King Ferry No 6/2000 (Fed. Declared disaster elsewhere). Flood 5/2002 Road flooding in Union Springs and Meridian. Landslide along Seneca River near Cross Lake in Town of Cato. 2/2003 Ice storm DR-1467 Yes - IA, PA 4/2003 3 deaths in Cayuga County. NE blackout. EM-3186 Yes - PA 8/23/2003 Snow emergency declared EM-3195 Yes - PA 1/2004 Rain/Flooding DR-1589 Yes - PA 4/2005 Flooding triggered by snow melt and rain. Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1650 No June 26 2006 — July 1, 2006 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1670 No November 16-17, 2006 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-4 August 2013 Type of Event FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) County Designated? Date Approximate Damage Assessment April Nor'easter DR 1692 No April 18, 2007 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1710 No June 19, 2007 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1857 No August 9, 2009 Severe Storms and Flooding DR 1993 No April 26, 2011— May 8, 2011 Severe Storms and Flooding EM 3328 No August 26, 2011 Hurricane Irene DR 4020 No August 26, 2011— September 5, 2011 Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straightline Winds EM 3341 No September 7-8, 2011 Remnants of Tropical Storm lee DR 4031 No September 7-11, 2011 Note: N/A = Not applicable ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-5 August 2013 NATURAL HAZARD RISK/VULNERABILITY RISK RANKING Hazard type Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses to Structures Vulnerable to the Hazard a, c Probability of Occurrence Risk Ranking Score (Probability x Impact) Hazard Ranking b Flood 1% Annual Chance: $510,188 Frequent 18 Medium 0.2% Annual Chance: $632,542 Severe Storm 100-Year MRP: $0 Frequent 18 Medium 500-Year MRP: $2,484 Annualized Loss: $340 Severe Winter Storm 1% of GBS: $2,554,325 Frequent 48 High 5% of GBS: $12,771,623 Transportation Not available Occasional 14 Low Ground Failure Karst Exposure $0 Rare 6 Low Moderate Incidence $0 Moderate Susceptibility $0 a. Building damage ratio estimates based on FEMA 386-2 (August 2001) b. High = Total hazard priority risk ranking score of 30 and above Medium = Total hazard priority risk ranking of 15-29 Low = Total hazard risk ranking below 15 c. The valuation of general building stock and loss estimates was based on custom inventory for Cayuga County. d. Loss estimates for the severe storm and severe winter storm hazards are structural values only and do not include the value of contents. e. Loss estimates for the flood hazard represents both structure and contents. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-6 August 2013 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT This section identifies the following capabilities of the local jurisdiction: Legal and regulatory capability Community Classifications E.1) Legal and Regulatory Capability Regulatory Tools (Codes, Ordinances., Plans) Do you have this? (Y or N) Enforcement Authority Code Citation (Section, Paragraph, Page Number, Date of adoption) 1) Building Code Yes Local 2010 2) Zoning Ordinance Yes Local 2007 3) Subdivision Ordinance Yes Local 1992 4) NFIP Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Yes 5) Growth Management 6) Floodplain Management / Basin Plan 7) Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance 8) Comprehensive Plan / Master Plan/ General Plan Yes Local 2009 9) Capital Improvements Plan 10) Site Plan Review Requirements Yes Local 2007 11) Open Space Plan 12) Stream Corridor Management Plan 13) Watershed Management or Protection Plan 14) Economic Development Plan 15) Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan 16) Emergency Response Plan 17) Post Disaster Recovery Plan 18) Post Disaster Recovery Ordinance 19) Real Estate Disclosure Requirement State State Requirement 20) Other [Special Purpose Ordinances critical or sensitive areas)] ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-7 August 2013 E.4) Community Classifications Program Classification Date Classified Community Rating System (CRS) NP Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) Public Protection Storm Ready NP Firewise NP N/A = Not applicable. NP = Not participating. - = Unavailable. The classifications listed above relate to the community’s effectiveness in providing services that may impact it’s vulnerability to the natural hazards identified. These classifications can be viewed as a gauge of the community’s capabilities in all phases of emergency management (preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation) and are used as an underwriting parameter for determining the costs of various forms of insurance. The CRS class applies to flood insurance while the BCEGS and Public Protection classifications apply to standard property insurance. CRS classifications range on a scale of 1 to 10 with class one being the best possible classification, and class 10 representing no classification benefit. Firewise classifications include a higher classification when the subject property is located beyond 1000 feet of a creditable fire hydrant and is within 5 road miles of a recognized Fire Station. Criteria for classification credits are outlined in the following documents: The Community Rating System Coordinators Manual The Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule The ISO Mitigation online ISO’s Public Protection website at http://www.isomitigation.com/ppc/0000/ppc0001.html The National Weather Service Storm Ready website at http://www.weather.gov/stormready/howto.htm The National Firewise Communities website at http://firewise.org/ F. MITIGATION STRATEGY F.1) Past Mitigation Actions/Status The town is currently looking in to purchasing property up stream for retention pond installation to prevent overflowing of Butera Drive. F.2) Hazard Vulnerabilities Identified The jurisdiction identified Butera Drive as a problem area within the community. According to the jurisdiction, the stream there overflows in spring when heavy thaw occurs and also when heavy rain occurs. The Cayuga County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) has identified the following vulnerabilities for the Town of Sennett, and has proposed hazard mitigation initiatives corresponding to these vulnerabilities, as shown in Section F.3 of this annex: ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-8 August 2013 Putnam Brook, a tributary that flows to the Seneca River, has been identified as having erosion issues. After heavy rainfall events, the swell of the stream erodes the banks and causes significant damage. As the banks deteriorate, cropland and other property is lost. The predominant land use adjacent to the watercourse is agriculture and residential. Streambank erosion is a primary concern, particularly during heavy rain events or during the spring melt. NFIP Summary Municipality # Policies # Claims (Losses) Total Loss Payments # Rep. Loss Prop. # Severe Rep. Loss Prop. # Polices in 100- year Boundary # Polices in 500- Boundary # Policies Outside the 500- year Flood Hazard Sennett 5 0 $0 0 0 3 0 2 Source: Policies, claims, repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss statistics provided by FEMA Region 2, in June 2012 using the “Comm_Name”. These statistics are current as of June, 2012. Please note the total number of repetitive loss properties includes the severe repetitive loss properties. Total building and content losses from the claims file provided by FEMA Region 2 (current as of June, 2012). The policy locations used are based on the latitude and longitude provided by FEMA Region 2. It is estimated that in the Town of Sennett, 71 residents live within the 1% annual chance flood area (NFIP Special Flood Hazard Area). Of the municipality's total land area, 5.4% is located within the 1% annual chance flood area. $6,838,904 of the municipality's general building stock replacement cost value (structure and contents) is located within the 1% annual chance flood area. There are 5 NFIP policies in the community. While there are 3 policies located within the 1% annual chance flood area, there are only policies issues to property owners in the 1% annual chance flood area. FEMA has identified 0 Repetitive Loss (RL) including 0 Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) properties in the municipality. HAZUS-MH estimates that for a 1% annual chance flood, $510,188 of the municipality's general building stock replacement cost value (structure and contents) will be damaged and 44 tons of debris could be generated. HAZUS-MH estimates no damage or loss of use to critical facilities in the community as a result of a 1% annual chance flood event. In some cases, a facility may be located in the DFIRM flood hazard boundary; however HAZUS did not calculate potential loss. This may be because the depth of flooding does not amount to any damages to the structure according to the depth damage function used in HAZUS for that facility type. Please refer to the Hazard Profiles for additional vulnerability information relevant to this jurisdiction. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-9 August 2013 F.3) PROPOSED HAZARD MITIGATION INITIATIVES Note some of the identified mitigation initiatives in Table F are dependent upon available funding (grants and local match availability) and may be modified or omitted at any time based on the occurrence of new hazard events and changes in municipal priorities. Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category SN-1 Purchasing property up stream for retention pond installation to resolve overflowing of Butera Drive. Existing Flood 1-2 4-3 Municipality, County, State OEM High High HMA Grant funding, municipal budget Short Term DOF High PP SN-2 Increase capacity of the catch basin on Miller Road near the railroad bridge. The cross culvert has been increased already. Existing Flood 1-1 Municipality High High HMA Grant funding, municipal budget Short Term DOF High PP SN-3 The Cayuga SWCD proposes to complete bank stabilization as needed along the Putnam Brook watercourse. Protecting the banks from erosion and removing excess gravel and debris from the watercourse will allow the main flow of the water to remain in the channel. Enhancement of the floodplain will also lead to a reduction of damage during a major storm event. Portions of the stream are also prone to ice jams. These cause flooding and an increase in erosion due to bed and bank scour, as well as having the potential for causing significant property damage. Significant losses to valuable agricultural land, forestland and property would be mitigated. Existing Flood 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 Cayuga SWCD; NYSDEC; USACE; High High HMA Grants, State, County, local funding On-going DOF Medium NR SN-4 Conduct and facilitate community and public education and outreach for residents and businesses to include, but not be limited to, N/A All Hazards 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 Municipality with support from Planning Partners, County Medium Medium Municipal Budget, HMA programs with local or county match Short Term High PE ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-10 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category the following to promote and effect natural hazard risk reduction: Provide and maintain links to the HMP website, and regularly post notices on the County/municipal homepage(s) referencing the HMP webpages. Prepare and distribute informational letters to flood vulnerable property owners and neighborhood associations, explaining the availability of mitigation grant funding to mitigate their properties, and instructing them on how they can learn more and implement mitigation. Use email notification systems and newsletters to better educate the public on flood insurance, the availability of mitigation grant funding, and personal natural hazard risk reduction measures. Work with neighborhood associations, civic and business groups to disseminate information on flood insurance and the availability of mitigation grant funding. Planning, NYSOEM, FEMA SN-5 Incorporate ordinances and/or zoning restrictions to control and mitigate future development in hazard areas, specifically as identified in Section I. N/A All Hazards 1-6 4-3 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR SN-6 Improve communication N/A All Hazards 3-3 Municipality Medium Medium Municipal Short Medium ES ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-11 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category systems. 3-7 with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Budget PR SN-7 Develop programs/procedures to capture and archive loss data from events. Examples include: Record location and length of roadway closures; Develop a database of residential and commercial property damage, including permit history for such repairs; High water marks, perhaps painting phone poles with high water marks and or regulatory Base Flood Elevations (BFEs). N/A All Hazards 1-3 1-4 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR SN-8 Obtain and install backup power sources at critical facilities. N/A All Hazards 3-3 3-5 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium ES SN-9 Participate in local, county and/or state level projects and programs to develop improved structure and facility inventories and hazard datasets to support enhanced risk assessment efforts. Such programs may include developing a detailed inventory of critical facilities based upon FEMA’s Comprehensive Data Management System (CDMS) which could be used for various planning and emergency management purposes including: Support the performance N/A All Hazards 1-1 1-3 1-4 Hazard Mitigation Plan Coordinator Medium- High Medium- High FEMA Mitigation Grant Programs with local match Long Term DOF Medium PR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-12 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category of enhanced risk and vulnerability assessments for hazards of concern. Support state, county and local planning efforts including mitigation (including updates to the State HMP), comprehensive emergency management, debris management, and land use. Improved structural and facility inventories could incorporate flood, wind and seismic-specific parameters (e.g. first floor elevations, roof types, structure types based on FEMA-154 “Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards” methodologies). It is recognized that these programs will need to be initiated and supported at the County and/or State level, and will require training, tools and funding provided at the county, state and/or federal level. SN-10 Support ongoing updates of Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans New and Existing All Hazards 1-6 Municipality with support from County Emergency Management Low Low Municipal Budget On-going High PR SN-11 Create/Enhance/Maintain Mutual Aid agreements with neighboring communities for continuity of operations N/A All Hazards 3-2 3-5 3-6 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM, FEMA and surrounding communities Medium Low Municipal Budget Short Term High PR, ES SN-12 Identify and develop agreements with entities that can provide support with FEMA/SOEM paperwork after N/A All Hazards 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Term Medium PR, ES ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-13 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category disasters; qualified damage assessment personnel – Improve post-disaster capabilities – damage assessment; FEMA/SOEM paperwork compilation, submissions, record-keeping FEMA SN-13 Work with regional agencies (i.e. County and NYSOEM) to help develop damage assessment capabilities at the local level through such things as training programs, certification of qualified individuals (e.g. code officials, floodplain managers, engineers). N/A All Hazards 3-6 3-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget, FEMA HMA and HLS grant programs Short- Long Term DOF Medium PR SN-14 Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Section 7.0 New and Existing All Hazards 3-1 3-5 Municipality with support from Planning Partners, County Planning, NYSOEM, FEMA High Low – High (for 5 year update) Municipal Budget, FEMA planning grants On-going High PR SN-15 Purchase, relocate, or elevate structures located in hazard- prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss property as priority. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates based on cost- effectiveness. Phase 2: Where determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of the determined action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability Existing Flood, Severe Storm 1-2 4-2 Municipality (via Municipal Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from County Planning, NYSOEM, FEMA High High FEMA Mitigation Grants Long Term DOF Medium PP SN-16 Maintain compliance with and good-standing in the NFIP N/A Flood, Severe Storm 1-4 1-6 Municipality (via Municipal High Low- Medium Municipal Budget Ongoing High PR, PE ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-14 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category including adoption and enforcement of floodplain management requirements (e.g. regulating all new and substantially improved construction in Special Hazard Flood Areas), floodplain identification and mapping, and flood insurance outreach to the community. Further, continue to meet and/or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and criteria through the following NFIP- related continued compliance actions identified as Initiatives below. 1-7 4-3 Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from NYSOEM, FEMA SN-17 Obtain and archive elevation certificates N/A Flood, Severe Storm 1-4 1-6 NFIP Floodplain Administrator Medium Low Municipal Budget On-going High PR SN-18 Promote the participation of Floodplain Administrators within the planning process and other activities. N/A Flood 1-4 1-7 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Medium Municipal Budget Short Medium PR SN-19 Enhance the County/community resilience to severe storms (incl. severe winter storms) by joining the NOAA “Storm Ready” program and supporting communities in joining the program. N/A Severe Storm 1-4 1-6 2-2 Municipality with support from County, NYSOEM and FEMA Medium Low Municipal Budget Short Term DOF Medium PE SN-20 Adopt regulations for undergrounding utilities in new developments. N/A Severe Storm 1-6 3-1 Municipal Council Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR SN-21 Implement permit fee waivers for installation of backup power for private property. N/A Severe Storm 2-4 2-5 Municipal Council Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR SN-22 Provide public education and outreach on proper installation and/or use of backup power N/A Severe Storm 2-1 2-2 Municipal Clerk Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR SN-23 Implement, review, and enforce municipal policies and programs to prevent trees from threatening lives and impacting power N/A Severe Storm 1-6 4-3 Municipal Code Enforcement Medium Low Municipal Budget Short H PR ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-15 August 2013 Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals and Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Mitigation Category availability/interruption. Notes: *Does this mitigation initiative reduce the effects of hazards on new and/or existing buildings and/or infrastructure? Not applicable (NA) is inserted if this does not apply. Acronyms and Abbreviations: ARC American Red Cross DPW Department of Public Works FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency HMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance HMP Hazard Mitigation Proposal N/A Not applicable NFIP National Flood Insurance Program NYSOEM New York State Office of Emergency Management NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration SWCD Cayuga County Soil and Water Conservation District USACE U.S Army Corp of Engineers USGS U.S. Geological Survey Costs: Where actual project costs have been reasonably estimated: Low = < $10,000 Medium = $10,000 to $100,000 High = > $100,000 Where actual project costs cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Possible to fund under existing budget. Project is part of, or can be part of an existing on-going program. Medium = Could budget for under existing work-plan, but would require a reapportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. High = Would require an increase in revenue via an alternative source bonds, grants, fee increases) to implement. Existing funding levels are not adequate to cover the costs of the proposed project. Benefits: Where possible, an estimate of project benefits (per FEMA’s benefit calculation methodology) has been evaluated against the project costs, and is presented as: Low = < $10,000 Medium = $10,000 to $100,000 High = > $100,000 Where numerical project benefits cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Long term benefits of the project are difficult to quantify in the short term. Medium = Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure to property. High = Project will have an immediate impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-16 August 2013 Potential FEMA HMA Funding Sources: PDM = Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program FMA = Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program RFC = Repetitive Flood Claims Grant Program SRL = Severe Repetitive Loss Grant Program HMGP = Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Timeline: Short = 1 to 5 years. Long Term= 5 years or greater. OG = On-going program. DOF = Depending on funding. Notes (for Mitigation Type): 1. PR=Prevention: Government, administrative or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built Examples of these are acquisition, elevation, relocation, structural retrofits, storm shutters, and shatter-resistant glass. 2. PP= Property Protection: These actions also include public activities to reduce hazard losses or actions that involve modification of existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or removal of the structures from the hazard area. Examples include planning and zoning, floodplain local laws, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and storm water management regulations. 3. PE=Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and school-age and adult education programs. 4. NR=Natural Resource Protection: Actions that minimize hazard loss and also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. 5. SP=Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, setback levees, floodwalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. 6. ES=Emergency Services: Actions that protect people and property, during and immediately following, a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response services, and the protection of essential facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-17 August 2013 PRIORITIZATION OF MITIGATION INITIATIVES Initiative # # of Objectives Met Benefits Costs Do Benefits equal or exceed Costs? (Yes or No) Is project Grant eligible? (Yes or No) Can Project be funded under existing programs/budgets? (Yes or No) Priority (High, Med., Low) SN-1 2 H H Y Y N H SN-2 1 H H Y Y N H SN-3 4 H H Y Y N M SN-4 5 M M Y Y N H SN-5 2 M M Y Y Y M SN-6 2 M M Y Y Y M SN-7 2 M M Y Y Y M SN-8 2 M M Y Y Y M SN-9 3 M M Y Y N M SN-10 1 L L Y N Y H SN-11 4 M L Y N Y H SN-12 1 M M Y N Y M SN-13 2 M M Y Y N M SN-14 2 H L Y Y N H SN-15 2 H H Y Y N M SN-16 4 H L Y N Y H SN-17 2 M L Y N Y H SN-18 2 M M Y N Y M SN-19 3 M L Y N Y M SN-20 2 M L Y N Y H SN-21 2 M L Y N Y H SN-22 2 M L Y N Y H SN-23 2 M L Y N Y H Notes: H = High. L = Low. M = Medium. N = No. N/A = Not applicable. Y = Yes. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-18 August 2013 Explanation of Priorities High Priority = A project that meets multiple objectives multiple hazards), benefits exceeds cost, has funding secured or is an on-going project and project meets eligibility requirements for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) or Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM) programs. High priority projects can be completed in the short term (1 to 5 years). Medium Priority = A project that meets goals and objectives, benefits exceeds costs, funding has not been secured but project is grant eligible under, HMGP, PDM or other grant programs. Project can be completed in the short term, once funding is completed. Medium priority projects will become high priority projects once funding is secured. Low Priority = Any project that will mitigate the risk of a hazard, benefits do not exceed the costs or are difficult to quantify, funding has not been secured and project is not eligible for HMGP or PDM grant funding, and time line for completion is considered long term (1 to 10 years). Low priority projects may be eligible other sources of grant funding from other programs. A low priority project could become a high priority project once funding is secured as long as it could be completed in the short term. Prioritization of initiatives was based on above definitions: Yes Prioritization of initiatives was based on parameters other than stated above: Not applicable. FUTURE NEEDS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND RISK/VULNERABILITY No information at this time. HAZARD AREA EXTENT AND LOCATION A hazard area extent and location map has been generated for the jurisdiction to illustrate the probable areas impacted within the municipality and is provided on the next page. This map is based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this Plan, and is considered to be adequate for planning purposes. Maps have only been generated for those hazards that can be clearly identified using mapping techniques and technologies, and for which the jurisdiction has significant exposure. The Planning Area maps are provided in the hazard profiles within Section 5.4, Volume I of this Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-19 August 2013 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 9.26: TOWN OF SENNETT DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cayuga County, New York 9.26-20 August 2013 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS No additional comments at this time. NFIP ADMINISTRATOR INPUT 1. Planning and Regulatory The Town of Sennett joined the NFIP on June 22, 1979, and is currently an active member of the NFIP. Current Flood Insurance Rate Maps have been in effect for the community since August 2, 2007. The Town of Sennett is proactive in floodplain management with ordinances meeting minimum requirements. 2. Administrative and Technical Staff The Town of Sennett has identified personnel to manage and uphold the Town of Sennett’s compliance with the NFIP, including Howard Tanner, Code Enforcement Official and NFIP Administrator. 3. Financial As of June, 2012, there are five policies enforced within the Town of Sennett. Of the 5 insurance policies, three are within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), and two are located outside the SFHA. As of June, 2012, there have been zero repetitive loss properties and zero severe repetitive loss properties within the Town of Sennett. 4. Educational None at this time. 5. Actions to Strengthen the Program None at this time.