← Back to Butte

Document Butte_doc_fd63384f09

Full Text

www.mmiplanning.com/butte/g1.htm 1 Greeley Neighborhood Steering Committee #6 November 30, 2010 6:30 PM – 8:30 PM MEETING NOTES Steering Committee Attendees: Doug Conway Tad Dale John Habeger Jed Hoopes Edie McClafferty Dan McClafferty Christy McGrath Gary Shea Jim Shive Terry Schultz Members not in attendance: Ed Randall Craig Dessing Sandy Garrett Gary Jones Staff/Consultant Attendees: Anne Cossitt Jolene Rieck Steve Hess Guests: Robert Bergsing R. Edward Banderob Debra Schultz Anne Cossitt began the steering committee meeting by discussing the purpose and outcomes for the meeting. Jolene Rieck reported on the results of the town hall meeting that was held in October. Anne Cossitt went through the draft neighborhood plan and explained the new formatting and organizational layout. The committee reviewed the draft document that was posted on line on November 24. Not all changes are documented in these meeting notes, but committee discussion will be incorporated into a revised plan scheduled to be distributed on December 8. Generally, the committee wanted to emphasize that Howard and Stuart were priority streets in the plan. The committee also suggested changing the name of the plan to the “Greeley/Racetrack Area Neighborhood Plan.” Some objectives and strategies were changed at the meeting. New strategies included adding street sweeping in the spring to mitigate dust, requesting BSB to implement a complete streets policy, and placing the neighborhood plan on the BSB website. Anne distributed the following schedule, noting that the consultant contract ends at the end of December 2010. ---PAGE BREAK--- www.mmiplanning.com/butte/g1.htm 2 December 8: Revised plan to the steering committee for final review comments. December 16: Deadline for comments on the final plan. December 23: Comments incorporated and re-sent to committee. December 30: Final draft plan sent with cover letter to the Planning Board. Committee members filled out an evaluation soliciting their thoughts on the planning process. 1. What has worked well for you in these meetings?  Wide range of discussions, directed by staff to specific purposes  The forum was good. Nice job!  Better knowledge of this neighborhood.  Liked listening to everyone’s thoughts and ideas. 2. What else would have made these meetings to you?  Maybe update the website sooner so info could be read more in advance  Cold Beer! John’s Pork Chop 3. In terms of the overall planning process, how would you rank the success of the steering committee in meeting its mission of providing stakeholder input and feedback to BSB? not good to 5‐Great!)  3.75, it was good  5  4  4 4. What questions or comments do you still have about the neighborhood plan?  Now is the time for motivated and not just opinionated people to begin work towards identified goals.  How will it survive? Needs to be a living document.  Nothing at this time. (2x) 5. What advice/suggestions do you have for Butte‐Silver Bow as they finalize this planning process?  The steering committee has put a lot of time and energy into this plan. Please do not place this master plan on hold and do nothing with it.  Give us the help we need, we have been over looked for too many years. Now is our time!!  Take the batons and run! We need your help!  Help in identifying financial/organizational helps. 6. Anything else you’d like to say?  Good job!  Thanks for all your hard work & facilitation.  Thank you! For your time & help.  Thanks to all the people who gave their time to help make this a successful committee. The meeting adjourned at 9:05 PM.