Document Burley_doc_776180b05c

December 2025 PROJECT NO. 221232 CITY OF BURLEY Water Master Plan PREPARED BY PREPARED FOR KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC. 100 E Bower St., Suite 110 Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 288-1992 CITY OF BURLEY 1401 Overland Avenue Burley, ID 83318 (208) 878-2224 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE 12/4/2025 Dec 04, 2025 DEQ Twin Falls Regional Office Jeff Kennedy, P.E. Dec 11, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 TOC TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1. Purpose and Need 1-1 1.2. Report Organization 1-1 1.3. Project Description 1-1 CHAPTER 2 - PLANNING BOUNDARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 2-1 2.1. Location & Planning Boundary 2-1 2.2. Environmental Resources Present 2-1 2.2.1. Physiography, Topography, Geology, & Soils 2-2 2.2.2. Surface & Groundwater Hydrology 2-2 2.2.3. Fauna, Flora, & Natural Communities 2-3 2.2.4. Housing, Industrial, and Commercial Development 2-3 2.2.5. Cultural Resources (Historical & Archaeological) 2-3 2.2.6. Utility Use 2-4 2.2.7. Floodplains & Wetlands 2-4 2.2.8. Wild & Scenic Rivers 2-5 2.2.9. Public Health & Water Quality 2-6 2.2.10. Prime Agricultural Farmlands 2-6 2.2.11. Precipitation, Temperature, and Prevailing Winds 2-6 2.2.12. Air Quality & Noise 2-7 2.2.13. Energy Production and Consumption 2-8 2.2.14. Socioeconomic Profile 2-8 CHAPTER 3 - EXISTING WATER SYSTEM 3-1 3.1. Supply, Treatment, and Water Quality 3-2 3.1.1. Water Rights 3-2 3.1.2. Supply 3-3 3.1.3. Existing Water Quality and Monitoring 3-7 3.2. Pressure Zones and Control Valves 3-7 3.3. Booster Pump Stations 3-8 3.3.1. Well 4 Booster Station 3-8 3.3.2. Well 5 Booster Station 3-9 3.3.3. Well 7 Booster Station 3-9 3.4. Storage Tanks 3-9 3.4.1. Tank 4 3-10 3.4.2. Tank 5 3-11 3.4.3. Tank 7 3-11 3.5. Facility Conditions Assessment 3-12 3.5.1. Well 2 3-12 3.5.2. Well 3 3-12 3.5.3. Well 4, Tank, and Booster Site 3-13 3.5.4. Well 5, Tank, and Booster Site 3-14 3.5.5. Well 6 3-15 3.5.6. Well 7, Tank and Booster Site 3-16 3.6. Distribution Pipe 3-16 3.7. System Classification and Licensure 3-17 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 TOC 3.8. Financial Status of Existing Facilities 3-17 3.9. Water/Energy/Waste Audits 3-17 3.10. Sanitary Survey 3-17 3.11. Satellite System – Watco System 3-19 3.11.1. Water Rights 3-19 3.11.2. Supply and Delivery 3-19 3.11.3. Storage Tank 3-20 3.11.4. Watco Demands 3-20 CHAPTER 4 - PROJECT PLANNING 4-1 4.1. Population Projections 4-1 4.2. Demand Analysis 4-3 4.2.1. Historical Water Demands 4-3 4.2.2. Planning Criteria Flows 4-5 4.2.3. Water Consumption 4-6 4.2.4. Unaccounted Water 4-6 4.3. Additional Planning Criteria 4-7 CHAPTER 5 - SUPPLY AND STORAGE ANALYSIS 5-1 5.1. Existing Water Rights 5-1 5.2. Supply Analysis 5-2 5.3. Delivery Analysis 5-4 5.4. Supply and Delivery Recommendations 5-5 5.5. Storage Analysis 5-5 CHAPTER 6 - EXISTING SYSTEM HYDRAULIC MODEL ANALYSIS 6-1 6.1. Model Development 6-1 6.1.1. Distribution Pipe Network Update 6-1 6.1.2. Demand Allocation 6-1 6.1.3. Model Calibration 6-1 6.2. Existing System Evaluation 6-3 6.2.1. Existing PHD Pressures 6-3 6.2.2. Existing Available Fire Flow 6-5 CHAPTER 7 - ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 7-1 7.1. Need for System Improvements 7-1 7.1.1. Health, Sanitation, and Security 7-1 7.1.2. Aging Infrastructure 7-1 7.1.3. Reasonable Growth 7-1 7.1.4. Compliance with State and Federal Regulations 7-1 7.1.5. Compliance with Planning Criteria 7-1 7.1.6. Summary of 7-2 7.2. Alternatives Analysis 7-2 7.2.1. No-Action Alternative 7-2 7.2.2. Optimizing Operation of Existing Facilities 7-3 7.2.3. Upper Pressure Zone Creation and Piping Alternatives 7-3 7.2.4. Upper Pressure Zone Supply 7-7 7.2.5. Upper Pressure Zone Delivery and 7-10 7.2.6. Alley Waterline Alternatives 7-11 7.2.7. Watco Tank System Alternatives 7-13 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 TOC 7.3. Selected Alternatives User rate Impacts 7-15 7.4. Selected Alternatives Environmental Impacts 7-15 7.4.1. Land Use / Prime Farmland / Formally Classified Lands 7-15 7.4.2. Floodplains / Wetlands 7-15 7.4.3. Cultural, Biological, and Water Resources 7-15 7.4.4. Socio-Economic Conditions 7-16 7.4.5. Land Requirements 7-16 7.4.6. Potential Construction Challenges 7-16 7.4.7. Sustainability Considerations 7-16 CHAPTER 8 - FUTURE HYDRAULIC MODEL ANALYSIS 8-1 8.1. Future Model Developement 8-1 8.2. Future System Evaluation 8-2 8.2.1. Future PHD Pressures 8-2 8.2.2. Future Available Fire Flow 8-4 8.3. Buildout Pipe Network 8-5 CHAPTER 9 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 9-1 9.1. Prioritization Criteria 9-1 9.2. Basis for Cost Estimates 9-1 9.3. Capital Improvement Plan 9-1 9.4. Priority 1 Projects 9-4 CIP 1.1 – Booster Station 5 Replacement (MPZ) 9-4 CIP 1.2 – Well 4, Booster Station, and Tank Improvements 9-4 CIP 1.3 – Well 2, 3, and 6 Improvements 9-4 CIP 1.4 – ITD Highway 30 Waterline Replacement 9-4 CIP 1.5 – Downtown Waterline Replacement 9-4 CIP 1.6 – S 600 W and 400 South Road Waterline Improvements 9-4 9.5. Permit Requirements 9-5 9.6. Sustainability Considerations 9-5 9.6.1. Updated CIP and Budget 9-5 9.6.2. Updated Rate Study 9-5 9.6.3. Water System Consolidation 9-5 9.6.4. Water Meter 9-5 9.6.5. Maintaining Asset Management System 9-6 9.6.6. High-Efficiency Lighting 9-6 9.6.7. Class A Reclaimed Water System 9-6 9.6.8. Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) and Efficient Motors 9-6 9.6.9. City SCADA System 9-6 9.7. Funding Options 9-6 9.7.1. Cash Funding 9-6 9.7.2. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (State Revolving Fund) 9-6 9.7.3. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (Section 595) 9-7 9.7.4. Idaho Bond Bank 9-7 9.7.5. Local and Private 9-7 9.8. Annual Budget Considerations 9-7 9.8.1. Annual Replacement Budgets 9-7 9.8.2. Operating Revenues/Expenses and User Rate Impacts 9-8 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 TOC 9.8.3. Operational Staffing Summary 9-11 9.9. Planning Recommendation 9-11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1: Planning Boundary 1 Figure 2-2: Topography 2 Figure 2-3: Sole Source aquifer 3 Figure 2-4: Flood plains 4 Figure 2-5: Wetlands 5 Figure 2-6: Wild and Scenic Rivers Within Idaho 5 Figure 2-7: High Quality Farmland 6 Figure 2-8: Idaho Air Quality Priority Areas 7 Figure 2-9: Noise Level 8 Figure 3-1: Existing Water System 1 Figure 3-2: Well 2 3 Figure 3-3: Well 3 4 Figure 3-4: Well 4 4 Figure 3-5: Well 5 Site 5 Figure 3-6: Well 6 6 Figure 3-7: Well 7 6 Figure 3-8: Tank 4 10 Figure 3-9: Tank 5 11 Figure 3-10: Tank 7 11 Figure 3-11: Electrical Panel and Motor Control Center 15 Figure 4-1: Historical and Projected Populations 2 Figure 4-2: 20-Year Growth Areas 2 Figure 4-3: Diurnal Curve 4 Figure 4-4: ISRB Site Specific Fire Flow Requirements 8 Figure 5-1: Water Rights Analysis 1 Figure 5-2: System MDD vs. Existing Supply 3 Figure 5-3: Peaking Storage 6 Figure 6-1: Hydrant Testing Locations 2 Figure 6-2: MDD EPS Tank level results 3 Figure 6-3: MDD EPS Booster Station VFD Results 4 Figure 6-4: 2024 Existing PHD (firm capacity) 4 Figure 6-5: Existing Available Fire Flow 5 Figure 6-6: Meets Required Fire Flow 6 Figure 7-1: 2021 UPZ Boundary Recommendation 4 Figure 7-2: Current Recommendation for the UPZ Boundary 5 Figure 7-3: UPZ Approximate Service Area 6 Figure 7-4: UPZ Piping recommendations 7 Figure 7-5: Urban Renewal Agency Owned Land Potential UPZ Well Site 8 Figure 7-6: Urban Renewal Agency Owned Land Well Setbacks 9 Figure 7-7: Alley Waterlines 12 Figure 7-8: Watco Alternative 1 14 Figure 7-9: Watco Alternative 2 14 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 TOC Figure 8-1: Burley Future System 1 Figure 8-2: MDD EPS Tank Level Results 2 Figure 8-3: MDD EPS Booster Station VFD Results 3 Figure 8-4: Future PHD 3 Figure 8-5: Future Meets Req’d Fire Flow 4 Figure 8-6: Future AFF 5 Figure 8-7: Burley Buildout System 6 Figure 9-1: CIP Map 3 Figure 9-2: Historical Revenue & Expenditures 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1: Water Rights 2 Table 3-2: Water Supply 3 Table 3-3: Well Controls 3 Table 3-4: Booster Stations 8 Table 3-5: Well 4 Booster Station Controls 8 Table 3-6: Well 5 Booster Station Controls 9 Table 3-7: Well 7 Booster Station Controls 9 Table 3-8: Storage Tank Characteristics 10 Table 3-9: Pipe Summary 16 Table 3-10: Operator Licenses 17 Table 3-11: Sanitary Survey Significant Deficiencies 18 Table 3-12: Watco Water Right Summary 19 Table 3-13: Watco Well Set Points 19 Table 3-14: Watco Tank Characteristics 20 Table 3-15: Watco Historical Demands 21 Table 4-1: Historical and Projected Populations 1 Table 4-2: Historical Demands 4 Table 4-3: Projected Demands 5 Table 4-4: 2042 Projected Demands Per Pressure Zone 5 Table 4-5: 2023 Top Users 6 Table 4-6: Unaccounted Water 7 Table 4-7: Additonal Planning Criteria 7 Table 5-1: Water Right Analysis 2 Table 5-2: Systemwide Supply Analysis 3 Table 5-3: Systemwide Delivery Analysis 4 Table 5-4: Storage Analysis Under Current Operation 6 Table 6-1: Water Calibration Summary 2 Table 7-1: UPZ Storage Analysis 11 Table 7-2: Relocating Alley Waterlines to Main Road Cost Implication 13 Table 7-3: Watco Alternative Cost Summary 15 Table 7-4: Alternatives Environmental Impacts Table 16 Table 9-1: Prioritization Criteria 1 Table 9-2: Capital Improvement Plan 2 Table 9-3: Annual Replacement Budgets 8 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 TOC Table 9-4: Historical Revenue & Expenditures 9 Table 9-5: User Rate Analysis 10 Table 9-6: Current Staffing 11 APPENDICES Appendix A – Full Size Figures Appendix B – Environmental References Appendix C – Water Rights Documentation Appendix D – Water Quality Appendix E – Watco Tank Reports Appendix F – Financials Appendix G – DEQ Sanitary Survey Appendix H – Population Information Appendix I – Cross Connection Ordinance Appendix J – Storage Analysis Appendix K – Alternative Cost Estimates Appendix L – UPZ Supply Memo from Brockway Appendix M – Capital Improvement Plan Appendix N – Annual Replacement Budgets Appendix O – Letter from Local Fire Authority Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 1-1 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION The City of Burley (City) contracted with Keller Associates, Inc. (Keller) to update their Water Master Plan (WMP). This chapter provides an introduction to the water master planning process and the purpose and need of this plan. 1.1. PURPOSE AND NEED This report was commissioned by the City in an effort to assess the current state of the water system and plan for future needs. The City of Burley last completed a WMP in 2015. Master planning is an important task for a public water system as it assists in re-assessing needs and priorities, properly allocating budgets to address system deficiencies, and plan for future growth. It is generally recommended to update a water plan every 5-7 years depending on the growth rate of the system. This study is funded by the City with additional funding from DEQ (DEQ Grant No. DWG-240-2022-11). 1.2. REPORT ORGANIZATION This study was developed to meet the requirements of the DEQ water facility planning checklist. The report organization consists of the following:  Chapter 1 – Introduction  Chapter 2 – Study Area: Identifies the project planning area and environmental resources present that may be impacted by recommended improvements.  Chapter 3 – Existing Water System: Provides an inventory of the existing water system including supply, distribution, storage, treatment, and controls.  Chapter 4 – Project Planning: Establishing planning time periods, historical and projected growth, historical water usage, projected water usage, and regulatory evaluation criteria.  Chapter 5 – Supply, Delivery, and Storage Analysis: Evaluation of the existing supply, delivery, and storage against the existing and future water demands.  Chapter 6 – Hydraulic Model Analysis: Evaluation of the existing distribution system including an analysis of operating system pressures and available fire flow under existing water demands.  Chapter 7 – Alternative Analysis: Evaluation of alternatives to address deficiencies identified in the supply, delivery, storage, and hydraulic model evaluations  Chapter 8 – Future System Hydraulic Model Analysis: Evaluation of the future distribution system with the selected alternatives in place and establishes future buildout pipe network size and location.  Chapter 9 – Capital Improvement Plan: Establishes prioritization criteria to rank selected improvements, provides cost estimates for selected improvements, discusses schedule for Priority 1 improvements, and discusses financial implications of the selected alternatives. 1.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This planning study evaluates the existing system and 20-year study period. It consists of an inventory of the existing system, establishing planning/evaluation criteria, existing system evaluation, future system evaluation, water quality evaluation, alternatives analysis, and capital improvement plan. These components prepare the City for the next 20 years as they continue to grow and improve their system. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-1 CHAPTER 2 - PLANNING BOUNDARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES This chapter provides the location of the project and defines the project planning boundary. Planning efforts will focus within the planning boundary only. This chapter also provides a summary of environmental resources present within the planning boundary. Appendix A provides full size figures of the following figures. 2.1. LOCATION & PLANNING BOUNDARY The City of Burley is located within Cassia and Minidoka Counties in Idaho approximately 34 miles east of Twin Falls, Idaho, see Figure 2-1. The planning boundary for this project is generally described as the area bounded by Interstate 84 on the north, 250 S on the south, the Snake River and 250 East on the east, and 250 to 350 W on the west. The planning boundary is also shown in Figure 2-1, see Appendix A for a full- size figure. Planning efforts are focused on serving the area within the planning boundary with potable water. FIGURE 2-1: PLANNING BOUNDARY 2.2. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRESENT The Water Master Plan is a planning effort with no physical construction of infrastructure or change of operation and maintenance procedures; the plan recommends infrastructure and operation improvements that may have environmental impacts. The environmental impact of the recommended improvements is briefly discussed throughout this report but does not represent a full environmental analysis for any of the recommended projects. A majority of the recommended projects are located within existing roadways, previously developed land, or City owned land. This section presents a summary of the environmental features within the planning boundary. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-2 2.2.1. Physiography, Topography, Geology, & Soils The City of Burley planning area is relatively flat with elevations ranging from approximately 4,140 to 4,200 feet. Elevations are highest in the southwest corner of the planning boundary. FIGURE 2-2: TOPOGRAPHY The major soil types in the Burley planning area are Declo Loam, Paulmyers loam, and Goose Creek Silty loam (See Appendix Goose Creek loams are the most common soil type, occupying about 20% of the planning boundary area. This poses a low risk of corrosion to concrete and a moderate to high risk of corrosion to steel. Further study would be required for a specific site to be properly evaluated (NRCS Cassia County Soil Survey). The majority of recommended new pipelines will likely be constructed of PVC material to mitigate risk of corrosion. 2.2.2. Surface & Groundwater Hydrology The Snake River is the primary drainage through Burley, extending from the east of the City to the west of the City. Surface water irrigation in Burley is largely controlled by the Burley Irrigation District. The City of Burley lies within the extent of a sole source aquifer named the Eastern Snake River Plain Aquifer, according to EPA’s sole source aquifers tool and map (See Figure 2-3). Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-3 FIGURE 2-3: SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER 2.2.3. Fauna, Flora, & Natural Communities The United States Department of Agriculture produces a database that lists endangered and threatened species throughout the country. The majority of priority improvements in the plan are proposed on previously disturbed lands, in urbanized areas, or in roadways. Impacts to threatened or endangered species are not anticipated. The species documented in Burley planning boundary that are listed as endangered, threatened, proposed, and candidate species by US Fish and Wildlife (as of April 13, 2023) are listed below: Threatened: None Endangered: Snake River Physa Snail Candidate: Monarch Butterfly. Appendix B includes a report from the US Fish and Wildlife. 2.2.4. Housing, Industrial, and Commercial Development The main corridor of commercial development is along Highways 30 and 24 as well as along Overland Avenue within the planning boundary. The remainder of the planning boundary consists primarily of residential zoning. Figure 2-10 in Appendix A provides a map of the City’s land use map. 2.2.5. Cultural Resources (Historical & Archaeological) The National Register of Historic Places lists one historic building in the City of Burley (Included in Appendix This building is the Cassia County Courthouse. It is not likely that any of the proposed improvements would affect these properties. Much of the construction of water improvements would be in the roadways or the designated rights-of-way with little or no impact on buildings in the vicinity. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-4 2.2.6. Utility Use The annual average daily water demand from 2015-2021 was 2,183 gallons per minute (gpm), which equates to approximately 293 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). Despite growth, the average water usage has remained relatively constant since the previous WMP. The maximum day water use from 2015-2021 was 5,726 gpm or approximately 762 gpcd. The average water use has remained relatively constant since the previous water master plan while the maximum day water use saw a slight increase. Peak hour water demands were estimated to be approximately 1.2 times the max day demand. Water usage is discussed further in Chapter 4. 2.2.7. Floodplains & Wetlands There is a mapped floodplain for the Snake River drainage within the planning boundary. This floodplain can be seen in the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) Idaho Flood Hazard Map and is shown in Figure 2-4. Portions of the planning boundary lie within the 100-year floodway and adjacent to the floodway of the Snake River. The individual flood map from FEMA can be seen in Appendix B. Recommended projects from this plan will consider floodplains during site selection and the project’s intended use. FIGURE 2-4: FLOOD PLAINS The US Fish and Wildlife Service maintains a National Wetlands Inventory. This inventory shows several mapped wetlands within the planning boundary. Most of the wetlands are near the northern border with the Snake River. Figure 2-5 shows the mapped wetlands within the planning boundary. Again, the recommended projects of this study will be on previously disturbed land, within existing roadways, or City owned land. Impacts to existing wetlands will be little to none. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-5 FIGURE 2-5: WETLANDS 2.2.8. Wild & Scenic Rivers There are no wild and scenic rivers within the planning boundary. Figure 2-6 shows wild and scenic rivers within Idaho with respect to the City of Burley. FIGURE 2-6: WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS WITHIN IDAHO Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-6 2.2.9. Public Health & Water Quality The City has a public drinking water system that provides potable water to the residents and businesses in Burley. The proposed improvements should not pose a threat to the existing groundwater quality. Best management practices should be employed during construction activities, which should also protect surface water quality in the Snake River and other surface water bodies. 2.2.10. Prime Agricultural Farmlands Much of the land outside of City limits, but within the planning boundary, is designated by the NRCS as important high-quality farmland, see Figure 2-7. The City of Burley has historically discouraged “leapfrog” development. Future development is expected to occur close to the existing city limits but will eventually involve development of irrigated farmlands located near the City. Most improvements would likely be located within areas previously disturbed by development. In some cases, future pipelines may be constructed within easements through unimproved or agricultural lands. FIGURE 2-7: HIGH QUALITY FARMLAND 2.2.11. Precipitation, Temperature, and Prevailing Winds The climate summary of June 1917 through June 1967 (See Appendix B) for Burley shows minimum average temperatures ranging from 16°F to 56°F, and maximum average temperatures ranging from 37°F to 91°F. Over this same period, the total annual precipitation averaged about 9.15 inches. The coldest month was January, and the hottest month was July. Based on Western Regional Climate Center wind data (1997 to 2006) for Twin Falls, Idaho (about 50 miles west of Burley), the prevailing wind direction is south in December, south-southwest from July through November and again in January, and West from February through June. The average wind speed for the area is 8.6 miles per hour. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-7 2.2.12. Air Quality & Noise The City of Burley does not have any air quality attainment areas or areas of concern as identified by Idaho DEQ air quality priority tool, see Figure 2-8. Recommended projects of this plan may have a temporary local impact on air quality (dust) during construction, but it is not likely to have long- term adverse impacts. Best management practices during construction can mitigate airborne dust during construction. FIGURE 2-8: IDAHO AIR QUALITY PRIORITY AREAS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 2-8 Noise levels in the Burley area are relatively low compared to the more populated areas nearby such as Twin Falls and Pocatello based on the National transportation Noise Map, see Figure 2-9. Recommended projects of this plan may temporarily increase noise levels during construction but will have minimal long-term effects. FIGURE 2-9: NOISE LEVEL 2.2.13. Energy Production and Consumption The existing water system utilizes electrical energy for pumping water. The City uses variable frequency drives (VFDs) for each of the booster pumps to maintain a relatively constant discharge pressure that is optimized for energy consumption. 2.2.14. Socioeconomic Profile The City of Burley has a population of approximately 12,041 people with a median age of 30.2. The median household income is approximately $58,900 and the median property value is $173,900. There will be no socio-economic or environmental justice issues raised by the proposed projects of this plan. The proposed projects will have mutual benefit to all water customers and improve the overall economic vitality of the area. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-1 CHAPTER 3 - EXISTING WATER SYSTEM The City of Burley owns and operates a potable water system which serves approximately 11,863 people within their service area. The water system consists of six wells, three storage tanks, three booster stations, one pressure zone and approximately 100 miles of distribution pipeline. This chapter provides an inventory of the existing water system’s components. Since the last Water Master Plan (WMP) in 2015, the City has completed upgrades to Well 4 and 5 Booster Stations. Well 4 Booster pumps 1 and 2 were replaced in 2018, and Well 5 Booster pump 2 was replaced in 2022. The City has also removed the PRV that separated the North and Main Pressure Zone (MPZ) making the system one single pressure zone. A figure of the City’s water system showing wells, tanks, and booster stations is illustrated in Figure 3-1 below and a full water system map is included in Figure 3-1 in Appendix A. FIGURE 3-1: EXISTING WATER SYSTEM Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-2 3.1. SUPPLY, TREATMENT, AND WATER QUALITY This section discusses the City’s existing water rights and well supply. Reported water right and well pumping capacities are provided along with general descriptions of each well facility. A general description of water quality monitoring is discussed. 3.1.1. Water Rights The City has twenty-one water rights associated with the potable water system and the low- pressure irrigation system, eighteen have common points of diversion at potable wells 2, 3, 4, and 5 and irrigation wells 8-15, 17, and 19 with a combined diversion rate of 27.36 cubic feet per second (cfs) or 12,280 gallons per minute (gpm). Only one water right is associated with Well 6, and two are associated with all current potable wells and irrigation wells 8-15 and 17-19. Table 3-1 provides a summary of the City’s water rights and supporting water rights documentation is provided in Appendix C. TABLE 3-1: WATER RIGHTS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-3 3.1.2. Supply The City’s potable water is supplied by six groundwater wells. Table 3-2 summarizes the reported capacity of each well and if it has standby power generator). Table 3-3 summarizes the well controls. This section also provides a description of each well. TABLE 3-2: WATER SUPPLY TABLE 3-3: WELL CONTROLS Well 2 Well 2 is located near 14th Street and Albion Avenue in the center of the City. The well site is shown in Figure 3-2. This well is a constant speed pump no VFD) that pumps directly into the distribution system and utilizes chlorine gas for disinfection. The pump is a water lube vertical turbine pump, and the City allows the water lube line to run continuously to avoid issues of pumps coming on without sufficient pre-lube run times and catastrophic pump damage. The well has no known water quality concerns. This well is only used for emergencies fire flow) and the City reported that it rarely is called on – the Well 7 Booster Station is close and has a large pumping capacity. FIGURE 3-2: WELL 2 Well Number Capacity (gpm) Backup Power 2 1,300 No 3 1,000 No 4 1,100 Yes 5 1,860 Yes 6 2,080 No 7 3,890 Yes Well On Setting Off Setting Control Feature Well 2 45 psi 68 psi System Pressure Well 3 50 psi 65 psi System Pressure Well 4 22 ft 29 ft Well 4 Tank Level Well 5 14.5 ft 17 ft Well 5 Tank Level Well 6 14 ft 17 ft Well 5 Tank Level Well 7 25 ft 29 ft Well 7 Tank Level Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-4 Well 3 Well 3 is located on the west side of the City along Park Avenue, immediately north of the Burley High School. The well site is shown in Figure 3-3. This well is also a constant speed pump no VFD) that pumps directly into the distribution system and utilizes chlorine gas for disinfection. The pump is a water lube vertical turbine pump, and the City allows the water lube line to run continuously to avoid issues of pumps coming on without sufficient pre-lube run times and catastrophic pump damage. This well is called on when local pressure drops approximately 15 psi. The City reported that this well comes on more frequently than Well 2; but it is not a daily occurrence. The well has no known water quality concerns. FIGURE 3-3: WELL 3 Well 4 Well 4 is located north of the river near 4th North Street and Overland Avenue. The well was constructed in 1978. Figure 3-4 shows the Well 4 site. This well is a constant speed pump no VFD) that pumps directly into Tank 4 located on the same site and has the ability to pump directly into the distribution system if needed. The well utilizes calcium hypochlorite tablets for disinfection. The well facility consists of a brick building that house both the well pump and four booster pumps. This well site also has a locked fence and surveillance video for security, and a diesel generator for standby power. The well has no known water quality concerns. FIGURE 3-4: WELL 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-5 Well 5 Well 5 is located on the south side of town on a lot surrounded by farm fields off Hiland Avenue. The well was originally constructed in 1977. The well site is shown in Figure 3-5. This well is a constant speed pump no VFD) that pumps to Tank 5 which is located on the same site. The well utilizes chlorine gas for disinfection and a filter to remove sand. The pump is a water lube vertical turbine pump, and the City allows the water lube line to run continuously to avoid issues of pumps coming on without sufficient pre-lube run times and catastrophic pump damage. The well facility consists of a metal and brick building that houses the well pump and three booster pumps. The site also has a diesel generator for standby power. Since the previous WMP, the site fence was replaced to improve security, and a communication tower was constructed near the tank. The well has no known water quality concerns. FIGURE 3-5: WELL 5 SITE Well 6 Well 6 is located along Hiland Avenue approximately a quarter mile northeast of Well 5. This well was originally constructed in 1999. The well site is shown in Figure 3-6. This well is a constant speed pump no VFD) that pumps directly into Tank 5. The well utilizes calcium hypochlorite tablets for disinfection. The pump is a water lube vertical turbine pump, and the City allows the water lube line to run continuously to avoid issues of pumps coming on without sufficient pre-lube run times and catastrophic pump damage. The well facility is located on a large property and the City is considering constructing a maintenance building on site. The well building facility has not had any recent upgrades. The City noted that the building has a lower elevation than the Tank 5 high water level. This has caused flooding of the Well 6 building when the mechanical discharge piping has been dismantled. This has been overcome by closing valving at the tank site or well site prior to dismantling the well discharge mechanical piping. The well has no known water quality concerns. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-6 FIGURE 3-6: WELL 6 Well 7 Well 7 is located along Hiland Avenue just north of Main Street near the fairgrounds. The well was constructed in 2007. The well pump is a vertical turbine line shaft oil lubed pump. This well site is shown in Figure 3-7. This well is a constant speed pump no VFD). This well pumps directly into the Tank 7. The well utilizes calcium hypochlorite tablets for disinfection. The well facility is a cinder block building that houses the well pump and three booster pumps. This site also has a diesel-powered generator that can run the well and boosters. The capacity of Well 7 increased since the previous WMP because it was rebuilt to fix bearing related issues, and the flow meter was replaced in 2023. The well has no known water quality concerns. FIGURE 3-7: WELL 7 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-7 3.1.3. Existing Water Quality and Monitoring The Safe Drinking Water Act establishes standards for drinking water quality to ensure public health. These standards limit concentrations of primary contaminants that pose a risk to life and health, such as total coliform, nitrates, and arsenic, and are monitored by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Providing water within the established maximum contaminate levels (MCL) is of the utmost importance, which is accomplished through required regular testing and reporting. Additionally, other contaminants, known as nuisance or secondary contaminants, are sometimes found in water systems. These include constituents like hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, iron, and manganese that cause aesthetic issues such as odor and color. The City of Burley also implements a Cross Connection/Backflow Prevention Program as part of its commitment to water safety. This program is critical for reducing contaminants entering the public water system through cross-connections, which are potential points where non-potable water could mix with drinking water. By mandating the installation and regular testing of backflow prevention devices, the program protects the water supply from substances from industrial, commercial, and even residential sources. This proactive approach complements the City’s overall strategy for maintaining water quality. The City had no maximum contaminant limit (MCL) violations but recorded three monitoring violations since 2014, all occurring in 2023 in the distribution system. The contaminants not monitored were DBP2 – stage 2, TTHM, and total haloacetic acids (HAA5). A summary of the required water quality monitoring is included in Appendix D, along with the City’s Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) and listed violations. 3.2. PRESSURE ZONES AND CONTROL VALVES Pressure zones are areas in the distribution system that have the same hydraulic grade line (HGL) or energy, consisting predominately of potential energy based on the ground elevation plus the water pressure in the system. The HGL within a pressure zone is typically controlled by boundaries that separate the pressure zones. Examples of pressure zone boundaries include closed valves, water storage tanks, booster pumps, and control valves such as pressure reducing valves (PRVs) or pressure sustaining valves (PSVs). In the previous WMP, the City was separated into two zones by a PRV located on the Overland Avenue bridge over the Snake River. Since then, two of the Well 4 booster pumps were upgraded to match the HGL of the City’s system south of the river so that the PRV could be opened, leaving the City to be served as one zone with a HGL of 4,324 feet. The PRV valve on the bridge is still in place but is open and does not restrict flows other than the headloss associated with the open valve. As the City grows it is likely that an upper pressure zone will be needed to service higher elevations south of town. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-8 3.3. BOOSTER PUMP STATIONS The City’s water system includes three booster stations: Well 4 Booster Station, Well 5 Booster Station, and Well 7 Booster Station. Table 3-4 summarizes the capacity of the pump station with all pumps operational. The following sections provide a summary of the booster stations. TABLE 3-4: BOOSTER STATIONS 3.3.1. Well 4 Booster Station The Well 4 Booster Station was originally constructed in 1987 and is located in the same building as Well 4. There are four booster pumps that draw water from Tank 4 through a 16-inch diameter pipe. Flow from the boosters is discharged into a looped 10-inch diameter distribution line. Booster pumps 1 and 2 were replaced in 2018 when the North Pressure Zone was consolidated into the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ). The two new pumps were installed to upgrade capacities, match the HGL of the MPZ, and install VFDs. Pumps 3 and 4 are larger fire flow pumps that remained in place. Pump 3 is not operable at this time, and Pump 4 frequently seizes up. The booster station also contains a pressure sustaining valve that allows excess flows to return to the water tank, preventing the system from over pressurizing. The control and operational setting of this booster station are provided in Table 3-5. TABLE 3-5: WELL 4 BOOSTER STATION CONTROLS Source Capacity (gpm)1 Well 4 Booster 1 220 Well 4 Booster 2 410 Well 4 Booster 32 0 Well 4 Booster 4 3,250 Well 4 Booster Total 3,880 Well 5 Booster 1 725 Well 5 Booster 2 4,700 Well 5 Booster 3 3,500 Well 5 Booster Total 8,925 Well 7 Booster 1 825 Well 7 Booster 2 3,120 Well 7 Booster 3 3,120 Well 7 Booster Total 7,065 1. gpm = gallons per minute. 2. Well 4 Booster 3 is not operable. Pump2 VFD Setting (psi) Control Feature Pump 1 73 City runs in hand Pump 2 73 City runs in hand Pump 3 73 City runs in hand Pump 4 73 City runs in hand Well 4 Booster Station 1. VFD = Variable Frequency Drive 2. The City runs pump 1 and 2 manually as needed to meet daily demands. Pumps 3 and 4 are turned on manually as needed by the City for larger demand events. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-9 3.3.2. Well 5 Booster Station Well 5 Booster Station is located in the same building as Well 5 and comprised of three booster pumps that draw from Tank 5 through a single 20-inch diameter pipe. The pump station discharges into a looped 14-inch diameter distribution system pipe that runs west to Overland Avenue and east to Hiland Avenue. All three pump motors have been reconditioned, and Booster 3 was replaced in 2022. All three booster pumps operate with a VFD. This pump station also contains a pressure relief valve that protects the system from over pressurizing. The control and operational setting of this booster station are provided in Table 3-6. TABLE 3-6: WELL 5 BOOSTER STATION CONTROLS 3.3.3. Well 7 Booster Station Well 7 Booster Station is located in the same building as Well 7 and comprised of three booster pumps that draw from Tank 7 through a single 20-inch diameter pipe. The booster station discharges to a looped 12-inch diameter distribution line in Hiland Avenue. All three pumps operate on VFDs. The pump station also has a pressure sustaining valve to protect the system from over pressurizing. No harmonic filter was noted during the site visit, if harmonics are a concern at this site, the City should consider adding harmonic filtering. The control and operational setting of this booster station are provided in Table 3-7. TABLE 3-7: WELL 7 BOOSTER STATION CONTROLS 3.4. STORAGE TANKS The City’s storage is made up of 3 tanks: Tank 4, Tank 5, and Tank 7. These three tanks have a combined total storage of 4.13 million gallons (MG). Table 3-8 summarizes the characteristics of the storage facilities. In addition to the City’s tanks there is the Burley-Heyburn Industrial Park (BHIP) Tank (referred to as the Gossner Tank/System in previous studies) that is part of the BHIP system (not examined within the scope of this study). The tank is an above ground welded steel tank and is filled by a well on site. The BHIP system is not currently connected to the City’s water system and therefore is excluded from the storage evaluations. There is also the Watco Tank that the City owns, but it is not a part of the City’s water system. The Watco Tank and System is discussed further in Section 3.11. The following sections summarize each tank. Pump On Setting (gpm) Off Setting (gpm) VFD Setting (psi) Control Feature Pump 1 - - 54 Controlled by flow and time delay Pump 2 > 750 < 850 54 Controlled by flow and time delay Pump 3 > 2,100 < 1,800 54 Controlled by flow and time delay Well 5 Booster Station 1. VFD = Variable Frequency Drive; MPZ = Main Pressure Zone; WTP = Water Treatment Plant. Pump On Setting (gpm) Off Setting (gpm) VFD Setting (psi) Control Feature Pump 1 - - 72 Controlled by flow and time delay Pump 2 > 750 < 700 72 Controlled by flow and time delay Pump 3 > 2,500 < 2,000 72 Controlled by flow and time delay 1. VFD = Variable Frequency Drive; UPZ-1 = Upper Pressure Zone 1. Well 7 Booster Station Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-10 TABLE 3-8: STORAGE TANK CHARACTERISTICS 3.4.1. Tank 4 Tank 4 is a nominal 0.75 million gallon (MG) bolted steel tank that was constructed in 1987 and is located adjacent to Well 4, which fills the tank. Figure 3-8 shows Tank 4. FIGURE 3-8: TANK 4 Characteristic Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 7 Material Bolted Steel Concrete Bolted Steel Base Elevation (ft) 4,145 4,188.8 4,154 Inner Diameter (ft) 61.6 131.5 104 Fill Set Point Level (ft) 26 14 25 Max Operating Depth (ft) 29 17 29 Height (ft) 33 21.8 36 Silt Stop Height (ft) 0.5 0.3 0.7 Dead Storage (gal) 11,147 33,794 42,364 Usable Volume (gal) 635,370 1,689,685 1,800,466 Volume per vertical foot (gal) 22,294 101,381 63,546 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-11 3.4.2. Tank 5 Tank 5 is a nominal 2.0 MG buried concrete tank that is filled by Well 5 and Well 6. Tank 5 is shown in Figure 3-9. FIGURE 3-9: TANK 5 3.4.3. Tank 7 Tank 7 is a nominal 2.0 MG bolted steel tank that was constructed in 2007. This tank is filled by Well 7. Tank 7 is shown in Figure 3-10. FIGURE 3-10: TANK 7 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-12 3.5. FACILITY CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT Keller Associates visited each of the well, tank, and booster station facilities with City staff to observe conditions and discuss deficiencies. This section summarizes the conditions and deficiencies observed and reported. Recommendations are made to address the list of shortfalls at each site. 3.5.1. Well 2 This well was originally constructed in 1986 and the well house roof was recently replaced in 2023. Deficiencies noted during the site visit and from City staff include: ➢ Power surges during windstorms ➢ Motor control center (MCC) and starters are outdated ➢ Flow meter is outdated ➢ Building security is lacking (no site fence and glass windows on building) The following improvements are recommended: ➢ Brick in windows or install bars over windows to improve security ➢ Replace MCC and pump starters ➢ Replace old flow meter when piping has reached its useful life (can be delayed to occur during piping upgrades as this well is rarely used) A capital improvement project will be provided in this report to make the recommended improvements, with the exception of replacing the flow meter. The flow meter can be replaced at a later date when the mechanical piping reaches the end of its useful life. Chapter 9 includes the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that describes each project. 3.5.2. Well 3 This well house had a new roof installed in 2014, and in 2023 the electrical panels were updated and the equipment inside the old panels was repurposed. Deficiencies noted during the site visit and from City staff include: ➢ Overhead lighting was not working ➢ Building security is lacking (several glass paned windows and wooden doors) ➢ Pump starter is outdated The following improvements are recommended: ➢ Brick-in windows or replace windows and install bars over windows to improve security ➢ Brick-in wooden double doors or replace with metal lockable doors to improve security ➢ Update pump starters A capital improvement project will be provided in this report to make the recommended improvements. Chapter 9 includes the CIP that describes each project. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-13 3.5.3. Well 4, Tank, and Booster Site The Well 4 site also includes the Well 4 Booster, and Tank 4. Deficiencies noted during the site visit, from the latest tank inspection report, and from City staff for each of these facilities include: ➢ Well and Booster Facilities: ➢ Building security is lacking: door and windows are aged, glass windows ➢ Soffit trim and roof flashing are aged and deteriorated ➢ Low ceiling that creates hard access to equipment ➢ Interior lighting is outdated ➢ Unused equipment, conduit, and hole penetrations on interior walls ➢ Interior needs repainted ➢ HVAC is old and worn ➢ Old hydraulic valves ➢ Pump 4 seizes up and pump 3 is not currently operational ➢ Automatic transfer switch (ATS) and generator are outdated; lines from generator over sidewalk should be rerouted ➢ Electrical and controls are outdated (MCC, main disconnect, feeder, SCADA, pressure transducers, lighting, etc.) ➢ Tank: ➢ Corroded bolts ➢ Corroded interior bolts and pipe supports ➢ Corroded access stub out pipes ➢ Worn gaskets ➢ Tank leaks ➢ Missing access cover seals ➢ Lacking hatch fall protection ➢ Interior tank corrosion The following improvements are recommended: ➢ Due to the significant improvements needed at the well and booster building, it is recommended that this facility be completely replaced. ➢ In 2024, the City went out for bids to correct the noted deficiencies for Tank 4. Only one bid was received, and the City felt it was not competitive. The City did not move forward with the project. It is recommended that the City re-bid the project to correct the noted deficiencies at Tank 4 again to see if the market has adjusted. A capital improvement project will be provided in this report to correct the tank deficiencies. Chapter 9 includes the CIP that describes each project. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-14 3.5.4. Well 5, Tank, and Booster Site The Well 5 site also includes the Well 5 Booster, and Tank 5. The tank was constructed in 1978. The previous WMP noted the tank lid was spalling and exposing some of the reinforcement. The tank lid has since been repaired and no further visible damage has occurred. The last internal tank inspection was completed in 2010 by Potable Divers Inc. The inspection report noted the exposed reinforcing in the tank lid, but did not note any additional concerns that needed repair. It was recommended that the tank be cleaned more often than every five years based on the amount of sediment removed during the cleaning. A likely contributor to the sediment is the sand production of Well 5. Deficiencies noted during the site visit, from the latest tank inspection report, and from City staff for each of these facilities include: ➢ Well and Booster Facilities: ➢ Well and booster building is outdated. ➢ During the summer of 2024, the air conditioning system was not operable due to repair parts having long lead times. The doors were open, and temperatures were frequently over 85 degrees inside the building. ➢ Roof access is a safety concern for operators. A ladder is used to access the lower roof above the chlorine room, then a second ladder is used to access the higher roof of the main pump room. ➢ Roof leaks over the electrical panels. A trash bag is draped over the electrical panel to prevent damage as shown in Figure 3-11. ➢ The MCC for the building has not been upgraded and replacement parts are no longer available due to the age of the system. ➢ ATS and generator are out of date. ➢ The driveway does not go all the way to the building. ➢ Site is very weedy. The following improvements are recommended: ➢ Due to the significant improvements needed for the well and booster building, it is recommended to replace the well and booster building completely. A capital improvement project will be provided in this report to replace these facilities. Chapter 9 includes the CIP that describes each project. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-15 FIGURE 3-11: ELECTRICAL PANEL AND MOTOR CONTROL CENTER 3.5.5. Well 6 Deficiencies noted at Well 6 during the site visit and from City staff include: ➢ Electrical panels and pump starters are outdated ➢ Building gutters need repair ➢ Site security is lacking (small gap between the fence and gate) The following improvements are recommended: ➢ Extend fence to remove gap between the fence and gate ➢ Replace electrical panels and pump starter ➢ Repair or replace gutters A capital improvement project will be recommended to make the recommended improvements. Chapter 9 includes the CIP that describes each project. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-16 3.5.6. Well 7, Tank and Booster Site The Well 7 site also includes the Well 7 Booster, and Tank 7. Deficiencies noted during the site visit, from the latest tank inspection report, and from City staff for each of these facilities include: ➢ Well and booster building: ➢ Two panels of missing flashing on the building exterior ➢ Site was weedy ➢ VFDs are nearing the end of their useful life ➢ Tank ➢ Old gasket to roof hatch ➢ Vent screen is lacking clamps on the bottom of the roof vent The following improvements are recommended: ➢ Replace missing flashing ➢ Implement weed control ➢ Monitor VFDs performance and consider replacing ➢ Replace tank roof hatch gasket ➢ Add clamps to the bottom of the tank roof vent to better secure the screen These recommendations are considered maintenance items by the City and no specific capital improvement project will be provided in this report. 3.6. DISTRIBUTION PIPE The City’s distribution pipe is primarily comprised of cast iron (CI) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), making up 86 percent of the distribution system. The pipe diameter size ranges from less than 4 to 16-inches with over 50 percent of the pipe being smaller than 8-inches. Table 3-9 summarizes the length and material of the City’s distribution pipe based on the City’s GIS from 2022. TABLE 3-9: PIPE SUMMARY Material GALV CI DI PVC Unknown Total % of Total ≤4 1,350 75,000 450 13,100 950 90,850 21% 6 0 97,900 20,800 38,100 500 157,300 36% 8 0 19,250 10,350 47,550 300 77,450 18% 10 0 9,000 10,400 31,600 0 51,000 12% 12 0 2,650 10,300 30,000 0 42,950 9.9% 14 0 1,300 3,100 0 0 4,400 1.0% 16 0 0 50 10,600 0 10,650 2.5% Total 1,350 205,100 55,450 170,950 1,750 434,600 100% % of Total 0.3% 47% 13% 39% 0.4% 100% - 1) Rounded to nearest 50 2) GALV = Galvanized Steel; CI = Cast Iron, DI = Ductile Iron, PVC = Polyvinyl Chloride (includes HDPE) Water Main Length (ft)1,2 Diameter (in) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-17 3.7. SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION AND LICENSURE The current Distribution System Classification on file with DEQ for the City’s water system is Distribution Class II. There is no current treatment classification for the City’s water system. Table 3-10 shows the City’s current staff licensures. With an assumed growth rate of 1.5% the City is expected to surpass 15,000 people in 2037, which is the maximum population served in a Class II system. Prior to this the City should increase the number of operators with a Class 3 licenses to anticipate the distributions classification change to a Class III. No operator licensing changes for treatment system classification are anticipated with the recommended projects and anticipated growth. TABLE 3-10: OPERATOR LICENSES 3.8. FINANCIAL STATUS OF EXISTING FACILITIES The City utilizes a base rate and additional charge structure based on usage. Currently, the City has a base rate of $26.40 for the first 3,000 gallons and charges an additional $1.29 per 1,000 gallons. Water rate information for the City is provided in Appendix F, and additional user rate analysis is discussed in Chapter 9 with the CIP projects. 3.9. WATER/ENERGY/WASTE AUDITS The City has not completed any recent water, energy, or waste audits. 3.10. SANITARY SURVEY A sanitary survey is an on-site review, conducted by DEQ, to evaluate and document the capabilities of a water system’s sources, treatment, storage, distribution system, operation and maintenance, and overall management and financial capacity. It also identifies any deficiencies that might adversely impact a public water system’s ability to provide a safe, reliable water supply. The survey seeks to identify systems that need technical or capacity development. The Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems require sanitary surveys of water systems to be taken every 3 years for community water systems. The City’s most recent sanitary survey was conducted 2022 and is provided in Appendix G. Table 3-11 summarizes the noted significant deficiencies and the status of the City’s efforts to correct them. License Number of Employees Distribution Class 1 1 Distribution Class 2 3 Distribution Class 3 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-18 TABLE 3-11: SANITARY SURVEY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES Significant Deficiencies Status Tank 4 The storage structure was observed to be leaking at the time of inspection. The City has prepared design drawings and specifications to correct the leak as well as other items noted in the latest dive inspection report. Only one bid was received that was not competitive. City will re- bid in the future. System All installed backflow devices and assemblies owned by the PWS are not tested annually. The City had the backflow devices tested in 05/2022 and has continued to test them annually. Wells 2 & 3 A bottle of ammonium hydroxide (56% ammonia solution) is not available for chlorine leak detection. The City has placed bottles of solution in each building on 10/2022. Wells 2 & 3 A leak repair kit is not provided and/or is not approved by the Chlorine Institute. City placed leak repair kits in 06/2022. Wells 2 & 3 The leak detector is not equipped with both an audible alarm and a warning light. Audible alarm and warning light were installed in 07/2022 and notify through the SCADA system as well. Wells 2 & 3 Each room where chlorine gas is used does not have an operational ventilating fan with a capacity that provides one complete air change per minute when the room is occupied. The City changed the fans out to work correctly now. Wells 2 & 3 The ventilating fan, where chlorine gas is used, does not take suction near the floor as far as practical from the door and air inlet, with the point of discharge to the outside, above grade, and so located as not to contaminate air inlets to any rooms or structures, with louvered air inlets near the ceiling. The fan in Well 2 was moved lower to the floor. A new inlet near the ceiling was installed for Well 3. Wells 2 & 3 The ventilating fan for the gas chlorination room discharges outside to areas that may be occupied by personnel or visitors. A fence was installed around the outlet at Well 2. There is not sufficient occupation around well 3 to have any diversions. Wells 2 & 3 The chlorine room is not provided with doors equipped with panic hardware, assuring ready means of exit and opening outward only to the building exterior. Panic hardware on existing doors installed 10/2022. Well 2 The chlorine room has a floor drain(s) that is not sealed during normal operation and/or is connected to another drain system. City inspected drains with plumbing inspector and found the drains are equipped with p-traps. City will regularly check and maintain water level. Well 3 Gas chlorination equipment is not in a separate, sealed room. City had a shatterproof window between the two areas installed in 10/2022. Well 3 All chlorine rooms, buildings, and areas do not prominently display danger signs warning of the presence of chlorine gas. Warning signs were installed in 07/2022. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-19 3.11. SATELLITE SYSTEM – WATCO SYSTEM The Watco System (referred to as the Dutchmen System in previous studies) was initially constructed as a private industrial well and tank located along Highway 30 near North 300 West approximately 2 miles west of Burley City limits. The water right, well, and elevated tank were purchased by the City in 2006. Due to the location of the Watco System, it has not been tied into the City’s potable water system. It currently serves the Watco and Newcold industries. The existing tank and well pumping facility have noted deterioration and are in need of improvement. Alternatives to replace the tank and well pumping facilities are discussed in Chapter 7. The following sections summarize the Watco System. 3.11.1. Water Rights The Watco system has a singular water right that includes irrigation, commercial, and domestic purposes of use. Table 3-12 summarizes the existing water right for the system. TABLE 3-12: WATCO WATER RIGHT SUMMARY 3.11.2. Supply and Delivery The Watco Well consists of a 200 horsepower (hp) well, that pumps at an unknown rate. The capacity of the well is approximately 500 gpm. This well pumps directly to the Watco Tank. The Watco Well on/off set points are provided in Table 3-13. Based off the Tank’s low level the Watco System’s HGL is approximately 4,300 feet which is 24 feet below the City’s MPZ HGL. There is a second well that can fill the tank, but it is owned by Watco and would require permission for the City to operate; the capacity of this well is also unknown. Deficiencies noted during the site visit and from City staff for well facility include: ➢ Electrical panels and pump starter is outdated ➢ Limited SCADA is in place at this well ➢ Piping needs replaced ➢ Pipe supports needs replaced TABLE 3-13: WATCO WELL SET POINTS Watco Water Right Priority Date Basis Category Water Right (cfs) Water Right (gpm) Irrigation1 2.15 965 Commercial 4.00 1,795 Domestic 0.40 180 6.55 2,940 8/24/1967 Decree Total 1. The irrigation component has a period of use from April 1st through October 31st. 45-07002 Set Points Tank Level (ft) Pressure (psi) On 132.8 57.5 Off 143.9 62.3 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-20 3.11.3. Storage Tank The Watco Tank is a 250,000-gallon elevated welded steel storage tank. Table 3-14 displays the tank characteristics. The Watco tank supplies the demands of the two industries by gravity. The Newcold facility has a fire flow storage tank that can provide four hours of their fire flow requirements, but this doesn’t cover the Watco facility. The Watco Tank was originally built in 1968, and operators have noted various issues such as leaks, freezing issues at the top of the tank in winter, and clanging noises from the transmission line when the well fills the tank. Additionally, a tank inspection was completed in 2020 by Potable Divers Inc. (Appendix E) where the following issues were noted: ➢ Missing hatch gasket ➢ Smaller gauge screen needed for roof vent ➢ Interior coating is at the end of its service life ➢ Corrosion is severely pitting the steel walls ➢ Exterior coating is starting to crack and peel ➢ Interior ladder is missing the bottom rung TABLE 3-14: WATCO TANK CHARACTERISTICS 3.11.4. Watco Demands The Watco system’s historical average day demand (ADD) and maximum day demand (MDD) were analyzed from 2015 to 2021. Historical demands are summarized in Table 3-15 in gpm. The 2022 planning criteria for the ADD was selected as the average seen from the 2015-2021 ADD, and the MDD was selected as the maximum MDD seen from 2015-2021. At this time, the City is not aware of any planned growth of the Watco or Newcold industries, and therefore, the planning criteria will be used for future demands as well. This system is not equipped with a flowmeter which logs data to SCADA, and therefore, a peak hour demand was not able to be estimated from existing data. Smaller water systems exhibit larger peaking factors due to their size. Also, industries sometimes have large demand events if there is a plant flushing, cleaning, or other water intense activity that regularly occurs. A max day demand to peak hour demand factor of 7.0 was assumed for this system. Prior to making improvements, it is recommended to install a flow meter that can track continuous demands for this system to check the peak hour demand flows. Characteristic Watco Tank Nominal Volume (gal) 250,000 Year Constructed 1968 Height to Bottom of Tank (ft) 125 High Water Level (ft) 143.9 Overflow (ft) 145.8 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 3-21 TABLE 3-15: WATCO HISTORICAL DEMANDS Year ADD1,2 (gpm) MDD1,2 (gpm) PHD1,3 (gpm) 2015 11 126 - 2016 14 108 - 2017 11 83 - 2018 13 172 - 2019 15 94 - 2020 19 158 - 2021 25 152 - Average / Max 15 172 - 2022 WMP Design 15 172 1,204 1. ADD = average day demand; MDD = maximum day demand; PHD = peak hour demand; gpm = gallons per minute; gpcd = gallons per capita per day; WMP = Water Master Plan. 2. The ADD design criteria was selected as the average seen from 2015-2021 to reflect current conditions. The MDD design criteria was selected from the max of the MDD from 2015-2021. 3. Peak Hour Factor for PHD/MDD was estimated to be 7.0. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-1 CHAPTER 4 - PROJECT PLANNING This chapter documents historical populations within the study area as well as establishes future projections throughout the 20-year planning period. This section also documents historical water production and water demand criteria in usage per capita. The usage per capita was used in conjunction with the population projections to estimate future water demands within the study area. Additional planning criteria for pressure, storage, and fire flow are also documented. The existing and projected water demands established in this chapter will be used to evaluate the water system and identify deficiencies. 4.1. POPULATION PROJECTIONS Historical populations and growth rates are presented in Table 4-1. The 20-year historical growth rate is approximately 1.2%. In more recent years, the City has seen more significant growth as shown in the 5- year historical growth rate at 2.7%. The City feels that the 20-year growth rate is more accurate for the purpose of this study and 20-year planning period. The City is also concurrently completing a sewer master plan where a range of growth rates is being shown from For the purpose of this study, the City has selected a growth rate of 1.5% to more closely match the 20-year historical growth rate and which is in between the growth rate range being presented in the sewer mater plan. Figure 4-1 shows the historical populations and projected populations. Note the population was projected to 2072 for water right planning purposes only. The City has also decided to use 3.0 people per household for this planning study. Recent Census data suggests that the average household size is 2.85 people, but the City feels that this number is low based on experience and has elected to use 3.0 people to be conservative. See Appendix H for population information. TABLE 4-1: HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED POPULATIONS Year City Population 1980 8,761 1990 8,702 2000 9,316 2010 10,345 2011 10,318 2012 10,354 2013 10,363 2014 10,373 2015 10,336 2016 10,381 2017 10,438 2018 10,477 2019 10,596 2020 11,704 2021 11,863 2.7% 1.2% 1.5% 12,041 2027 12,972 2032 13,974 2037 15,054 2042 16,217 2072 25,349 4. Population growth was based on a growth rate of 1.5% Historical Projected 1. Populations for 1980-2010 were taken from the Census. 2. Populations for 2011-2019 and 2021 taken from Idaho Department of Labor population Estimates on 05/17/2023. 3. The 2020 population was taken from the 2020 Census. City Elected Growth Rate 2022 Design Population 5-Year Ave. 20-year Ave (2000-2021) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-2 FIGURE 4-1: HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED POPULATIONS Locations of growth during the next 20 years were developed based on the City’s input. These locations are shown in Figure 4-2. For the purpose of this study, it was assumed that commercial growth would grow proportional to the residential growth. See Appendix A for a full-size figure with the number of equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) per residential growth area. FIGURE 4-2: 20-YEAR GROWTH AREAS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-3 4.2. DEMAND ANALYSIS This section reviews the historical water production for the City’s potable water system and includes an analysis of the following demand scenarios:  Average Day Demand (ADD) – The average daily volume of water produced during the calendar year.  Maximum Day Demand (MDD) – The maximum volume of water produced in a single day in the year.  Peak Hour Demand (PHD) - The highest hourly flow, excluding fire flow, that a water system or distribution system pressure zone is likely to experience. 4.2.1. Historical Water Demands The previous Water Master Plan (WMP) looked at historical demands from 2010 to 2014. This WMP builds upon the previous plan; water demands from 2015 through 2021 from the system’s wells were reviewed and compiled along with data from the previous WMP summary. Historical demands for ADD and MDD are summarized in Table 4-2 in gallons per minute (gpm) and gallons per capita per day (gpcd), and the flow planning criteria for this study are documented. Overall, the planning criteria for ADD has increased by approximately 10 percent while the MDD only increased by approximately 2% compared to the previous plan. It should be noted that these demands represent a composite of all types of water usage within the City, including residential, commercial, and industrial. Additionally, the City’s residential customers are divided into those who use potable water for irrigation and those who use a separate irrigation system. Therefore, the flow planning criteria are also composite planning numbers. The City requires new residential developments to provide separate irrigation water. As a result, new developments will likely use less water than the planning criteria indicate, since they don’t include commercial uses and will have separate irrigation supplies. It is recommended that the City designate in its consumption data whether the customer (both new and existing) uses potable water for irrigation or has a separate irrigation system. This will allow the City to more accurately estimate the demand per capita for new residential developments. The planning criteria selected for this study is conservative and it is suspected that with the recommendation to track residential irrigation use the planning criteria could be reduced in future studies. Additionally, to protect water quality the City has an approved cross connection ordinance which is included in Appendix I. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-4 TABLE 4-2: HISTORICAL DEMANDS The City’s supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data was reviewed during the highest demand week during 2018 (7/29/18-8/4/18) to develop a diurnal curve of the system’s demands and to estimate a MDD to PHD factor. The available SCADA data was utilized to create a diurnal curve, which matches the general shape and pattern of the diurnal curve developed in the previous WMP and is show in Figure 4-3. The MDD to PHD factor is 1.2 which is also comparable to the MDD to PHD factor in the previous WMP. As mentioned, the City’s diurnal demand curve generally matches the curve from the previous WMP but is much flatter during the non-peak usage times. Contributing factors to the flatter curve include additional industries that have connected to the system since the last WMP, more residential users with separate pressure irrigation systems have been added, and a portion of the population working swing and night shifts at the added industries. FIGURE 4-3: DIURNAL CURVE gpm gpcd gpm gpcd 2010 10,345 1,439 200 5,363 747 3.73 2011 10,450 1,394 192 5,004 690 3.59 2012 10,550 2,139 292 5,473 747 2.56 2013 10,660 2,162 292 5,530 747 2.56 2014 10,770 2,184 292 5,587 747 2.56 2014 WMP Design 10,770 2,184 292 5,587 747 2.56 2015 10,336 2,407 335 5,466 762 2.27 2016 10,381 2,317 321 4,865 675 2.10 2017 10,438 2,228 307 5,072 700 2.28 2018 10,477 2,515 346 5,158 709 2.05 2019 10,596 2,424 329 4,715 641 1.94 2020 11,704 2,424 298 4,460 549 1.84 2021 11,863 2,556 310 4,760 578 - 2010-2021 Average / Max 10,718 2,183 293 5,560 747 2.55 2015-2021 Average / Max 10,828 2,410 321 5,726 762 2.38 2022 WMP Design3 12,041 2,685 321 6,372 762 2.37 1. ADD = average day demand; MDD = maximum day demand; gpm = gallons per minute; gpcd = gallons per capita per day; WMP = Water Master Plan 2. Populations for 2000-2014 taken from previous Water Master Plan (Table 5.1). Populations for 2015-2019 taken from Idaho Department of Labor population Estimates on 05/17/2023 The 2020 population was taken from the 2020 Census. The population of 2021 was taken from U.S. Census Bureau Quickfacts. 3. The ADD design critieria in gpcd was selected as the average seen from 2015-2021 to reflect current conditions. The MDD design criteria, in gpcd, was selcted from the max of 2015-2021. Notes New Data Population2 Peaking Factor (MDD/ADD) ADD MDD Year Previous WMP Data Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-5 4.2.2. Planning Criteria Flows Future demands for the system were estimated based on the projected population growth during the planning period coupled with the demand planning criteria. The projected demands for the system for the 20-year planning period are shown in Table 4-3. Note that the projected demands for 2072 are also shown for water rights planning purposes only. TABLE 4-3: PROJECTED DEMANDS Existing demands are in a single pressure zone. A new Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ) will be recommended in this study to accommodate future growth on the southern end of the city. The projected 2042 demands of the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ) and the new UPZ are presented in Table 4-4. TABLE 4-4: 2042 PROJECTED DEMANDS PER PRESSURE ZONE Year Population ADD (gpm) MDD (gpm) PHD2 (gpm) 2022 12,041 2,685 6,372 7,647 2023 12,222 2,725 6,468 7,762 2024 12,405 2,766 6,565 7,878 2025 12,591 2,807 6,663 7,996 2026 12,780 2,849 6,763 8,116 2027 12,972 2,892 6,865 8,238 2032 13,974 3,116 7,395 8,874 2037 15,054 3,356 7,967 9,561 2042 16,217 3,616 8,582 10,299 2072 25,349 5,651 13,414 16,097 1. ADD = average day demand; MDD = maximum day demand; gpm = gallons per minute; gpcd = gallons per capita per day 2. Based on a peaking factor of 1.20 Zone ADD (gpm) MDD (gpm) PHD (gpm) MPZ 3,480 8,259 9,911 UPZ 136 322 388 System 3,616 8,581 10,299 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-6 4.2.3. Water Consumption The City’s 2023 water meter consumption data was reviewed to identify the top water users. The 15 largest consumptive users were identified and are presented in Table 4-5. TABLE 4-5: 2023 TOP USERS 4.2.4. Unaccounted Water All water systems experience some unaccounted water. Unaccounted for water is defined as the difference between water produced and water delivered to the customer. Unaccounted for water in the City was estimated by comparing the total annual volume produced from the City’s wells to the total annual volume recorded in the City’s billing system. The previous WMP looked at unaccounted for water from 2011 which was estimated at about 15%. This WMP looked at the 2020 and 2021 production vs consumption, which shows that portion of unaccounted for water has remained steady. Table 4-6 summarizes the water loss analysis. The City reported that sources of unaccounted for water include:  Un-metered City buildings  Un-metered park facilities and park irrigation  Un-metered connections at the Fair Grounds  Hydrant flushing  Un-metered fire truck filling station  Un-metered City truck filling station  Street sweeping  Un-metered City landscape irrigation  Un-metered community water filling station (City installed a meter on this station recently)  Water lube well pumps that constantly drain water down the well pump shaft Customer No. Name Annual Total (gal) ADD (gpm) 39.7000.00 Alto Magic Valley, LLC 143,477,700 273.0 39.3450.00 High Desert Milk 88,601,230 168.6 28.3964.00 Fabri-Kal 52,793,720 100.4 10.2622.00 Cassia Regional Hospital 11,773,833 22.4 16.2940.00 Joint School Dist 151 - Dworshak 10,390,550 19.8 28.3963.00 Fabri-Kal 10,371,642 19.7 39.3550.03 Gavilon Agriculture, LLC 9,392,085 17.9 34.5885.03 Bel-Aire Trailer Court 9,346,615 17.8 39.4080.00 Burley Inn Inc 8,439,000 16.1 36.3310.01 Conrad & Bischoff 7,714,745 14.7 13.2158.13 Joint School Dist 151 - WP Irrig 7,405,893 14.1 34.4640.05 Raven's Hi 7,215,150 13.7 36.3040.01 The Bubble Barn 6,751,360 12.8 30.2870.05 All Pro Linen 6,643,650 12.6 17.1395.01 Mini-Cassia Justice Center 6,081,940 11.6 2023 Top Users Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-7 It is recommended that the City install meters on facilities such as un-metered buildings and parks. It is also recommended that the City track water usage for the other un-metered uses and incorporate the use into the consumption data to get a more realistic picture of the unaccounted water throughout the City. TABLE 4-6: UNACCOUNTED WATER 4.3. ADDITIONAL PLANNING CRITERIA Additional Planning Criteria outside of demands are summarized in Table 4-7. The system will be evaluated with these additional criteria in the following chapters. Pressure and redundancy criteria are set forth in IDAPA 58.01.08 (Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems) and fire flow requirements are set by the local fire authority (Appendix O) or Idaho Surveying and Rating Bureau (ISRB). Site specific fire flow requirements set by ISRB are shown in Figure 4-4. The City has elected to account for 8 hours of ADD for emergency storage, and did not want to offset emergency storage with the total pumping capacity with backup power. TABLE 4-7: ADDITIONAL PLANNING CRITERIA Year 2011 2020 2021 Sold/Metered (MG) 897 1,099 1,139 Produced (MG) 1,055 1,278 1,344 Unnaccounted For (MG) 158 179 204 Unnaccounted For 15% 14% 15% Item Criteria Min Pressure During Fire Flow 20 psi Min Pressure During PHD 40 psi Max Pressure 80 psi Fire Flow Requirements1 Existing Residential: 1,000 gpm for 2 hours Future Residential: 1,500 gpm for 2 hours Commercial: 2,500 gpm for 3 hours Industrial: 3,500 gpm for 4 hours Site Specific per ISRB Power Outage ADD for 8 Hours + Fire Flow Mechanical Redundancy Provide PHD or MDD + Fire Flow With any pump out of service Operational Storage Based on Tank Setpoints or 10% of Storage Volume Equalization Storage Calculated by Diurnal Curve Emergency Storage 8 Hours of ADD Fire Storage Largest Fire Flow Requirement 1. The Special District Zone from the City's land use map will be analyzed based on the commercial fire flow criteria. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 4-8 FIGURE 4-4: ISRB SITE SPECIFIC FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 5-1 CHAPTER 5 - SUPPLY AND STORAGE ANALYSIS This chapter provides a comprehensive analysis of Burley's drinking water supply, storage, and delivery facilities. It examines the capabilities of the existing infrastructure to meet current and future demands and discusses general recommendations for addressing any identified deficiencies. The calculations presented in this chapter are based on reported values for capacities and demands and do not account for the dynamic and complex hydraulics associated with the distribution system. Chapter 6 includes an evaluation with a hydraulic model where distribution system deficiencies are evaluated. While this chapter offers an overview of the improvements needed, a more detailed evaluation of specific improvement alternatives is provided in Chapter 7. 5.1. EXISTING WATER RIGHTS Water rights define the legal diversion rate from a water supply groundwater or surface water). The authorized diversion rate of a water right should, at a minimum, equal the maximum day demand (MDD) of a water system that is equipped with storage, or the peak hour demand (PHD) of a water system without storage. The City’s potable water system is supplied by six wells covered by 21 groundwater rights. These same water rights also cover the City’s separate low-pressure irrigation system. Analyzing the City’s low-pressure irrigation system and demands was outside the scope of this study. The City provided 2023 and 2024 SCADA flow data for each well that supplies the low-pressure irrigation system. From this SCADA data, the PHD of the irrigation system was estimated to be 4,197 gpm. Figure 5-1 and Table 5-1 summarize the City’s available water rights and compare them to the water system’s (MDD) and low-pressure irrigation system’s (PHD) projected demands. Assuming the City’s low-pressure irrigation system doesn’t expand demands do not increase), the City has sufficient water rights to meet the current and 2042 projected demands. However, there is a projected water rights deficit of approximately 1,260 gpm by 2072. Beyond the 20-year planning period, the City will need to acquire additional water rights. Based on the projections, additional water rights would be needed by 2064. The City requires new developments to have a separate pressure irrigation system to lessen the demand on the potable system. It is recommended that the City continue to require this, and that new developments retain the water rights associated with the land on which they are constructed to cover the pressure irrigation system and demands. Additionally, to achieve maximum flexibility, Keller Associates recommends that the City consolidate its water rights to include all wells as points of diversion. FIGURE 5-1: WATER RIGHTS ANALYSIS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 5-2 TABLE 5-1: WATER RIGHT ANALYSIS 5.2. SUPPLY ANALYSIS The supply capacity is the physical capability of supplying water to a system. This differs from the water rights capacity, which is only a legal ability to divert water to a system. Similar to water rights, a water system’s supply capacity should, at a minimum, equal the MDD of a water system that is equipped with storage, or the larger of the PHD or MDD plus fire flow of a water system without storage. The Idaho Administrative Code (IDAPA) requires that water systems meet their supply with firm capacity largest source offline). The City currently relies on six groundwater wells to meet system demands. Wells 2 and 3 pump directly into the distribution system while the rest of the wells pump into storage tanks. Table 5-2 compares the system’s current supply capacity against existing and future MDD demands. The City’s firm supply meets Well Water Right # Priority Date Basis Water Right (cfs) Water Right (gpm) 36-4080 8/7/1961 Decreed 0.91 408 45-4089 5/31/1947 Decreed 1.23 552 45-4090 4/1/1943 Decreed 2.01 902 45-4091 4/1/1955 Decreed 1.72 772 45-4092 4/1/1928 Decreed 1.34 601 45-4093 12/31/1934 Decreed 2.00 898 45-4094 12/31/1949 Decreed 1.66 745 45-4095 4/1/1917 Decreed 1.11 498 45-4096 12/31/1917 Decreed 1.34 601 45-4097 4/14/1905 Decreed 0.89 399 45-4098 9/30/1960 Decreed 2.67 1,198 45-4099 12/31/1941 Decreed 2.67 1,198 45-7269 5/25/1976 Decreed 3.56 1,598 45-7436 2/15/1980 Decreed 0.69 310 45-11133 12/31/1954 Decreed 0.89 399 45-13895 10/30/1926 Decreed 0.89 399 45-14083 3/31/1939 Decreed 1.34 601 45-14290 4/1/1944 Decreed 0.44 197 27.36 12,280 6 45-7735 9/3/1996 License 4.46 2,002 4.46 2,002 45-13411 10/22/2001 License 4.07 1,827 45-7686 2/11/1991 License 0.54 242 4.61 2,069 36.43 16,351 6,372 4,197 5,782 8,582 4,197 3,572 13,414 4,197 (1,260) 2042 Water Rights Surplus 2072 Potable MDD 2072 Water Rights Surplus Grand Total 2022 Potable MDD 2022 Water Rights Surplus 2022 Irrigation PHD 2042 Irrigation PHD 2072 Irrigation PHD 2042 Potable MDD Potable Wells 2-5 and Irrigation Wells 8-15, 17, and 19 Total Total Potable Wells 2-7 and Irrigation Wells 8-15 and 17-19 Total Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 5-3 the existing MDD with a surplus. However, the firm supply is not capable of meeting 2042 projected demands. Figure 5-2 displays the available firm well supply capacity compared to the projected systemwide MDD. Based on the projected demands the firm supply capacity is exceeded in 2031. The existing MDD is approximately 86% of the firm supply capacity. It is recommended that the City begin to secure additional well supply now as wells may take years to be brought online due to associated processes such as land acquisition, well drilling, multiple approvals from DEQ, construction and lead times for some equipment. Some of the anticipated developments during the planning period are located south of town in an area identified as needing a new, higher, pressure zone to provide adequate service pressures. This new pressure zone will be referred to as the Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ). Chapter 7 provides more background and details regarding the new UPZ. The City’s existing supply sources are all located in the City’s Main Pressure Zone (MPZ). New sources will be recommended within the UPZ to be dedicated to this new area and address the projected supply deficit. Sources in the UPZ would also be able to benefit the MPZ through pressure reducing valves (PRVs). Alternatives to add additional sources are discussed further in Chapter 7. TABLE 5-2: SYSTEMWIDE SUPPLY ANALYSIS FIGURE 5-2: SYSTEM MDD VS. EXISTING SUPPLY Well Number Capacity (gpm) 2 1,300 3 1,000 4 1,100 5 1,860 6 2,080 7 3,890 Total Capacity 11,230 Firm Capacity 7,340 2022 MDD 6,372 Supply Surplus / (Deficit) 968 2042 MDD 8,582 Supply Surplus / (Deficit) (1,242) Systemwide Supply Analysis Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 5-4 5.3. DELIVERY ANALYSIS The delivery capacity is the capability of pushing water into the distribution system. This differs from the supply capacity as supply sources often don’t always pump directly into the distribution system. For example, supply sources often pump into storage tanks, which is the case for the City. Delivery into a water distribution system must be capable of supplying, at a minimum, the larger of the PHD or MDD plus fire flow with firm capacity (largest source offline). Direct delivery into a water distribution system can include any combination of the following sources:  Wells that pump directly into a pressure zone.  Booster pumps that can convey water from a storage facility into a pressure zone  PRVs flowing from a higher zone to a lower zone The City’s existing distribution system is a single pressure zone with wells and boosters delivering water. The 2042 distribution system will have two pressure zones with PRVs capable of providing flow from the UPZ to the MPZ; they will also be equipped with backflow capability. New pumping facilities dedicated to the UPZ and MPZ will also be part of the 2042 system. As the UPZ does not exist currently, Table 5-3 evaluates the delivery capacity of the system as a whole. TABLE 5-3: SYSTEMWIDE DELIVERY ANALYSIS The delivery analysis shows that the system has a surplus for the current and 2042 demands. However, as mentioned previously, a new UPZ is recommended to provide adequate service pressures south of town. The existing delivery will not be able to provide adequate pressures in the UPZ. New pumping facilities are recommended to deliver water to the UPZ. Alternatives to address delivery into the new UPZ are discussed further in Chapter 7. Source Capacity (gpm) Well 2 1,300 Well 3 1,000 Well 4 Booster 1 220 Well 4 Booster 2 410 Well 4 Booster 3 0 Well 4 Booster 4 3,250 Well 5 Booster 1 725 Well 5 Booster 2 4,700 Well 5 Booster 3 3,500 Well 7 Booster 1 825 Well 7 Booster 2 3,120 Well 7 Booster 3 3,120 Total Capacity 22,170 Firm Capacity2 17,470 2022 PHD 7,647 2022 MDD+FF3 10,872 2022 Surplus / (Deficit) 6,598 2042 PHD 10,299 2042 MDD+FF3 13,082 2042 Surplus / (Deficit) 4,388 Systemwide Delivery Analysis1 3. Based on the industrial zone fire flow requirement of 4500 gpm. 2. Firm capacity is total capacity less the largest source. 1. gpm = gallons per minute; PHD = peak hour demand; MDD = maximum day demand; FF = fire flow Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 5-5 5.4. SUPPLY AND DELIVERY RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the supply and delivery capacity analysis, new well sources are recommended to meet future demands and are recommended to be located in the UPZ. New delivery pumping facilities are recommended to service the new UPZ. Supply and delivery recommendations not related to the capacity analysis include security and electrical improvements at the Well 2 and Well 3 facilities based on the conditions assessment (see Chapter Also, replacement booster pump facilities are recommended for the Well 4 and Well 5 booster station facilities. Replacement facilities for these two booster stations can also provide benefit to the delivery needs for the UPZ and distribution system deficiencies (see Chapter Alternatives for these recommendations will be discussed further in Chapter 7. 5.5. STORAGE ANALYSIS This section includes an analysis of the existing storage within the City’s water system. Minimum volumes and guidelines for storage components are established in the IDAPA. There are four components of storage requirements for potable water systems:  Operational Storage - The volume of water used from the reservoirs during normal operation between the on/off set points of sources that fill the tank. Typically, it is recommended to use approximately 10% of the total storage volume for operational storage to provide appropriate pump run times and adequate reservoir mixing and turnover.  Peaking (or Equalization) Storage - The volume needed to compensate for the difference between the maximum supply capacity and the system’s peak demands. Ideally this is calculated based on the systemwide diurnal curve and difference between the MDD & PHD.  Fire Storage - The volume needed to supply the largest fire flow demand for its specified duration.  Emergency Storage - The minimum volume of water to supply the water system during unusual conditions or when supply sources have failed. The City’s storage is made up of 3 tanks: Tank 4, Tank 5, and Tank 7, that combine for a total of 4.13 million gallons (MG) of usable storage. A storage analysis was completed under current operating conditions and is presented in Table 5-4. The peaking storage was calculated using the diurnal curve. This is graphically presented in Figure 5-3, see Appendix J for additional peaking storage calculation details. Fire storage was calculated from the largest fire flow requirement of 4,500 gpm for four hours. Emergency storage was calculated with eight hours of ADD. Table 5-4 shows a storage surplus of only 0.34 MG in 2042. It is recommended that additional storage be added to the system and be sited in the UPZ adjacent to the new well sources. Storage provides many benefits outside of the components of storage such as source flexibility, delivery flexibility, spatial diversification of storage availability, and water quality treatment if required by the new sources. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 5-6 TABLE 5-4: STORAGE ANALYSIS UNDER CURRENT OPERATION FIGURE 5-3: PEAKING STORAGE Year 2022 2042 ADD (gpm) 2,685 3,616 MDD (gpm) 6,372 8,582 Operational Storage 0.63 0.63 Peaking Storage 0.26 0.35 Fire Storage2 1.08 1.08 Emergency Storage3 1.29 1.74 Total Storage Required 3.25 3.79 Total Storage Available 4.13 4.13 Storage Surplus / Deficit 0.87 0.34 Storage Analysis (all values in MG)1 1. ADD = average day demand; MDD = maximum day demand; MG = million gallons; MGD = million gallons per day 2. Assumes 4500 gpm for 4 hours 3. Assumes 8 hours of ADD Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 6-1 CHAPTER 6 - EXISTING SYSTEM HYDRAULIC MODEL ANALYSIS This chapter includes a description of the hydraulic model development and an evaluation of the existing distribution system. The evaluation includes an analysis of peak hour demand (PHD) pressures and maximum day demand (MDD) available fire flow. The results from the model are evaluated against the planning criteria established in Chapter 4. 6.1. MODEL DEVELOPMENT This section discusses the efforts to update, load, and calibrate the model. 6.1.1. Distribution Pipe Network Update The City’s computer hydraulic model of the distribution system was updated from the previous master plan by comparing the City’s current GIS and record drawings to the model distribution network. Many discrepancies were identified and then resolved based on GIS records, record drawings, or the knowledge of the City staff. It is recommended that the City continue to keep detailed records of new projects and update the GIS and water model as projects or modifications are constructed and brought online to maintain an accurate current model. 6.1.2. Demand Allocation The top 15 users were assigned their average 2023 demands from meter reading data and factored up to the appropriate model scenario demands with peaking factors. The top 15 users are documented in Chapter 4 (Table 4-5). The top 15 users account for approximately all system demands over 10 gpm. The remaining demand in each scenario was spread evenly throughout the system. Water systems are largely governed by fire flow demands which are significantly larger than normal domestic demands; spreading smaller domestic demands evenly throughout the system is an appropriate allocation method. 6.1.3. Model Calibration On March 28, 2022, Keller Associates assisted the City in completing six hydrant tests to be used for calibrating the hydraulic model. Tests consisted of two pressure hydrants monitored in addition to the flow hydrant to provide two calibration points in the model. In addition to the observation hydrants, SCADA was provided where available for the boundary conditions (wells, booster stations, storage tanks) which included pressure and flow data. The six hydrant test locations are shown in Figure 6- 1. The field conditions noted during each hydrant tests were mimicked in the hydraulic model and the field results were compared to the model results. This comparison is summarized in Table 6-1. The hydraulic model calibrated very well with the majority of the observed field conditions matching within 1-2 psi of the modeled conditions. The difference in pressure readings at Hydrant A of Test 1 was likely the result of an erroneous static reading, as the amount of headloss is unlikely from the Well 4 Booster Station. Test 6 appears to not calibrate as well the other tests, but the model results are within observed fluctuations in the pressure gauges and could also be the result of a closed pipe in the vicinity that the City noted had been closed occasionally; the City has since checked and the valves in this area are open. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 6-2 FIGURE 6-1: HYDRANT TESTING LOCATIONS TABLE 6-1: WATER CALIBRATION SUMMARY Test Hydrant Field Pressure Drop (psi) Model Pressure Drop (psi) Field vs. Model Difference (psi) Hydrant A 5 9 -4 Hydrant B 7 7 0 Hydrant A 2 2 0 Hydrant B 1 0 1 Hydrant A 2 4 -2 Hydrant B 3 4 -1 Hydrant A 6 7 -1 Hydrant B 2 4 -2 Hydrant A 2 3 -1 Hydrant B 1 2 -1 Hydrant A 10 7 3 Hydrant B 6 3 3 6 1 2 3 4 5 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 6-3 6.2. EXISTING SYSTEM EVALUATION This section includes a summary of the existing distribution systems’ hydraulic model evaluation to meet pressure and fire flow requirements under current demands. This evaluation was completed with the hydraulic model that was developed, loaded, and calibrated as discussed previously. The planning criteria for pressure and fire flow requirements are provided in Chapter 4. 6.2.1. Existing PHD Pressures The water model was exercised to evaluate pressures in the distribution system under PHD. The Idaho Administrative Code (IDAPA) requires water systems to meet PHD with firm capacity largest pump out of service) while maintaining a minimum pressure of 40 psi. A maximum day extended period simulation (EPS) was modeled in order to observe how the system works collectively and to check system pressures during the peak hour of the maximum day. Results of the tank levels, booster station discharge pressures, and pump flows were reviewed with the City; the City noted that the results represent the system. Figure 6-2 and Figure 6-3 show the tank levels and booster station discharge pressure results from the maximum day EPS, respectively. Each of the tanks are able to recover to their high level setpoints throughout the EPS without any difficulty. The Well 5 and Well 7 booster stations are able to meet their target discharge pressures throughout the maximum day EPS. The Well 4 Booster Station is not able to meet its target discharge pressure of 73 psi; it fluctuates between 67-70 psi. This is due to pumps 3 and 4 not being on in this scenario. Pump 3 is no longer operational, and pump 4 frequently seizes up and is used for fire flow events. They were left off during this simulation to more accurately represent normal operating conditions. The PHD pressures from the maximum day EPS model simulation are presented in Figure 6-4. These results are under firm pumping capacity largest booster at Well 5 Booster Station off). Under this scenario the system is able to maintain pressures above the required 40 psi minimum. Although the Well 4 Booster Station is not able to meet its target discharge pressure, its discharge pressures is relatively close to the target and system pressures are not compromised. Pressures in the southwest corner of the system, around DOT Foods, drop to 40 psi during peak hour of the maximum day EPS scenario. This area is slated to be transitioned into the Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ), see additional details in Chapters 7 and 8. FIGURE 6-2: MDD EPS TANK LEVEL RESULTS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 6-4 FIGURE 6-3: MDD EPS BOOSTER STATION VFD RESULTS FIGURE 6-4: 2024 EXISTING PHD (FIRM CAPACITY) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 6-5 6.2.2. Existing Available Fire Flow A MDD plus fire flow model scenario was run to evaluate the available fire flow throughout the existing system under firm capacity largest booster at Well 5 Booster Station off). Per local fire authorities, 2,500 gallons per minute (gpm) of fire flow was assigned to nodes in commercial areas, 3,500 gpm of fire flow was assigned to nodes in industrial areas, and 1,000 gpm of fire flow was assigned to nodes in existing residential areas. Specific fire flow requirements from the Idaho Surveying and Rating Bureau (ISRB) that exceed the fire flow requirement based on land use were also assigned in the model. The majority of the nodes unable to meet their fire flow requirement are due to smaller diameter pipes 4 and 6-inch pipes). Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects will be recommended to upsize, or loop when possible, waterlines in the distribution system to correct these fire flow deficiencies. The nodes in the southwest corner of the system, around DOT Foods, located in the industrial land use fail not due to smaller diameter waterlines, but due to lower static pressures that fall below 20 psi during fire flow demands. This area is slated to be incorporated into the UPZ (see Chapters 7 and 8 for additional discussion on the UPZ). The available fire flow results of this scenario are shown in Figure 6-5. Figure 6-6 shows if the model node met or failed its assigned fire flow requirement. FIGURE 6-5: EXISTING AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 6-6 FIGURE 6-6: MEETS REQUIRED FIRE FLOW Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-1 CHAPTER 7 - ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS This chapter summarizes the need for system improvements and discusses improvement alternatives to address deficiencies identified in the previous chapters. Where improvements are relatively straightforward undersized waterline needing upsized to meet fire flow requirements), alternatives are not discussed. To address more complex deficiencies supply deficit, insufficient storage, or operating pressures out of compliance with requirements/planning criteria), additional alternative analysis and details are provided. This chapter also provides a brief environmental impact review for the selected alternatives. The selected alternatives will be included in the capital improvement plan (CIP) discussed in Chapter 9. 7.1. NEED FOR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS This section summarizes the system’s deficiencies with respect to health, sanitation, security, aging infrastructure, reasonable growth, compliance with State and Federal regulations, and compliance with planning criteria. 7.1.1. Health, Sanitation, and Security The City’s water system does not have any water quality concerns with the constituents listed in the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) had several observations and recommendations for the system in the last sanitary survey. These observations and recommendations are summarized in Chapter 3. The City has completed all items except for Tank 4 which has several condition items that still need addressed. The City went out for bids for the repairs but only one bid was received, and the City did not feel it was competitive. This project will be included in the CIP of this plan and the City will look to rebid the project again in the future. 7.1.2. Aging Infrastructure The City noted several deficiencies at wells, booster stations, and tanks due to aging infrastructure. The City did not note any distribution system improvements needed due to aging infrastructure. However, as mentioned in Chapter 3, only 37% of the distribution system is PVC piping. Depending on the age and condition of the non-plastic distribution pipes, repairs or replacements of pipelines may begin to be more frequent. 7.1.3. Reasonable Growth The City has seen modest growth in recent years, and it is anticipated that it will continue to grow. Consequently, the water system is also anticipated to grow. Some of this growth is anticipated to be south of town at higher elevations. Keller Associates analyzed the City’s need for an Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ) south of town in the previous master plan. The UPZ recommendation was also revisited in 2021 when several developments requested to build near the UPZ boundary. Delivery improvements will be needed to service the UPZ. Additional growth also places more demand on the City’s supply. Additional supply sources will be needed throughout the planning period due to growth. 7.1.4. Compliance with State and Federal Regulations This plan did not identify any State or Federal regulation related deficiencies. The UPZ will be needed to keep system pressures in compliance with state requirements for the area south of town. 7.1.5. Compliance with Planning Criteria The existing supply, delivery, and storage analysis did not show any deficiencies with respect to the planning criteria. The future supply and delivery analysis does show the need for additional supply sources and new delivery facilities to serve the UPZ. See Chapter 5 for details. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-2 The existing system hydraulic analysis did not show any pressure concerns in the distribution system but did show several locations that do not meet the fire flow planning criteria based on land use. The fire flow deficiencies in the distribution system are proposed to be corrected with simple pipeline upsizing or looping projects. Alternatives for these deficiencies will not be evaluated, but the recommended pipe improvement projects are included in the CIP. 7.1.6. Summary of Deficiencies Based on the conditions assessment, capacity analyses, and existing system model evaluation, the City’s water system is facing the following deficiencies. The following sections will discuss alternatives to correct these deficiencies and document the City’s selected alternatives except for the improvements that are relatively straight forward (i.e. improvements warranted from conditions assessment and fire flow improvements).  Conditions Deficiencies:  Well 2, Well 3, and Well 6 have outdated electrical equipment and security concerns.  Well 4 and Well 5 Booster Stations are dated and have many other condition deficiencies that warrant total replacement for these facilities.  Supply  Additional supply will be needed to meet projected demands.  System Pressures  A new UPZ south of town will be needed to meet the planning criteria for pressure and fire flow.  Delivery  New delivery facilities are needed to service the new UPZ.  Fire Flow  Many existing pipes need to be upsized or looped to correct fire flow deficiencies.  Storage  There will only be a surplus of 0.34 million gallons (MG) at the end of the planning period. A new tank is recommended in the UPZ to maximize the UPZ supply and provide delivery flexibility while providing storage beyond the planning period. 7.2. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS This section documents the alternatives evaluated to address the deficiencies summarized in the previous section. Pros and cons for alternatives are noted, cost estimates are provided, and the preferred alternative is selected where appropriate. 7.2.1. No-Action Alternative In the “No-Action Alternative” the City would choose not to correct any of the noted deficiencies and the system would remain as is. This is not an acceptable alternative as the systems’ existing deficiencies will only worsen as growth occurs. The system would be at risk of not being able to meet the planning criteria or State regulations. Locations with inadequate fire flow would worsen, and some locations with just sufficient fire flow may fall below their required fire flow, as demands increase due to growth. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-3 7.2.2. Optimizing Operation of Existing Facilities Optimizing operations of existing facilities is not a viable option to correct the deficiencies as the system suffers from physical constraints such as aging infrastructure or capacity needs. No adjustment of set points or valve turning will fix the existing deficiencies. The City has not completed an energy audit for their water systems. However, all booster pumps that directly pressurize distribution systems are controlled by variable frequency drives (VFDs). As future improvements take place energy efficiency will be included in the design process. Energy efficiency improvements that can be achieved in water systems generally focus on two key aspects: VFDs and higher efficiency pumps. By installing VFDs on pumps, motor speed can be adjusted based on the required water demand. This allows the pumps to operate at optimal levels, reducing energy consumption during periods of lower water demand. VFDs also enable soft starts and stops, preventing sudden surges in power and reducing wear and tear on the equipment. Furthermore, upgrading to higher efficiency pumps with improved hydraulic performance can decrease energy usage. These pumps are designed to deliver the same flow rate while consuming less power, resulting in tangible energy savings over the long term. 7.2.3. Upper Pressure Zone Creation and Piping Alternatives As mentioned in previous chapters, development is anticipated in the south end of town. Elevations generally climb from north to south. As development pushes further south the water system pressures will decrease, eventually falling below the planning criteria (40 psi for peak hour demands [PHD] or 20 psi for max day demand [MDD] plus fire flow). There are two alternatives to address pressures falling below the planning criteria due to increasing elevations:  Alternative 1 – Moratorium on growth on the south end of town  Alternative 2 – Creating a new UPZ to boost pressures to meet the planning criteria Banning development south of town is not an acceptable solution for the City. The City has elected to create a new UPZ. The need for the UPZ was identified in the previous master plan. Since the previous master plan, several developments approached the City in 2021 that were near the boundary of the UPZ as defined in the previous master plan. Keller Associates evaluated the pressure zone boundary at that time and recommended the UPZ boundary as shown in Figure 7-1. Recommendations for improvements at the Well 5 Booster Station and a new well, tank, and booster station were also made along with piping recommendations, also shown in Figure 7-1. The improvement recommendations for the Well 5 Booster and new well, tank, and booster will be discussed in following sections. This section will focus on the UPZ boundary and piping recommendations. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-4 FIGURE 7-1: 2021 UPZ BOUNDARY RECOMMENDATION Several years have passed since the UPZ boundary recommendation shown in Figure 7-1. The City’s water system has grown, and the water model has been updated to more accurately reflect current conditions and demands. Based on current conditions, the UPZ’s boundary is recommended as shown in Figure 7-2. The key difference between the previous and the new boundary recommendation is the boundary between Overland Avenue and Washington Avenue has been moved further north to W 150 South rather than following W 200 South and the G Canal. The reason for this change is that pressures in this area drop below 50 psi if served by the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ). The City would like to target a minimum PHD pressure of 50 psi in the MPZ to provide additional flexibility in fire flow. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-5 FIGURE 7-2: CURRENT RECOMMENDATION FOR THE UPZ BOUNDARY The recommended target head of the UPZ is 4,378 feet, which is about 45 feet higher than the MPZ. With this new boundary and recommended head, the City will be able to service several miles south with the new UPZ. Targeting a minimum PHD pressure in the UPZ similar to the MPZ, this equates to the elevation contour of 4,264 feet, see Figure 7-3. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-6 FIGURE 7-3: UPZ APPROXIMATE SERVICE AREA Several piping recommendations are proposed with the creation of the UPZ. A network of 12-inch pipes on the mile and half-mile roads is proposed to provide a backbone to support transmission and fire flow. There are several segments of existing 14-inch and 16-inch transmission lines along the planned boundary of the UPZ. It is recommended that parallel large diameter transmission lines be dedicated to both zones at the zone boundary. This will require the installation of new 16-inch transmission lines, converting a segment of 14-inch transmission line from the MPZ to the UPZ, and abandoning small segments of existing lines to isolate the new UPZ. The UPZ piping recommendations are illustrated in Figure 7-4. Portions of the new 16-inch and 14-inch piping along the zone boundary are shown in areas that may require easements or right-of-way acquisition. Should easements or right-of-way not be obtainable along the planned corridor, the City should consider alignments and willing participants further to the south up to West 200 South. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-7 FIGURE 7-4: UPZ PIPING RECOMMENDATIONS 7.2.4. Upper Pressure Zone Supply As presented in Chapter 5, additional water supply is required to meet 2042 demands. Currently, all the City’s well supply sources are located within the MPZ. It is recommended that the new supply be located within the UPZ. The City has indicated that the Urban Renewal Agency owns land in the western part of the UPZ, and that part of this property could be sold to the City for the purpose of developing additional supply. As noted by the City, the portion of the UPZ owned by the Urban Renewal Agency is illustrated in Figure 7-5. The City has selected to proceed with planning for additional supply at this location. The City has also elected to plan for the development of two wells with a target yield of 2,000 gpm each, rather than a larger single well. The City prefers two smaller wells for maintenance and cost efficiency, as larger wells present more maintenance challenges and significantly increased costs. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-8 FIGURE 7-5: URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OWNED LAND POTENTIAL UPZ WELL SITE Brockway Engineering provided a preliminary well site analysis for this location as well as preliminary recommendations for the development of these two new wells. See Appendix L for the full Brockway Technical Memorandum. This section summarizes Brockway’s recommendations and other key points of the evaluation.  New potable water wells for public water systems are required to provide minimum setbacks from potential sources of contamination. A full list of minimum setbacks is provided in the Brockway Technical Memorandum. This site for the new wells in the UPZ is largely undeveloped and does not have many known existing sources of potential contamination. The memo recommends a general 50-foot setback from potential sources of contamination, a 100-foot setback from W 100 S in the event that a pressurized sewer force were to be installed, and a 25-foot setback from the H Canal on the south border (see next bullet for additional canal setback requirements). Figure 7-6 illustrates the setbacks for this site. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-9  Groundwater near surface water can be to some degree hydraulically connected. This is referred to as groundwater under the direct influence of surface water. DEQ has adopted guidelines by which public drinking water wells are evaluated to check for groundwater under direct influence of surface water; referred to as GWUDI. For this potential site for the wells in the UPZ, the H Canal constitutes surface water. In general, DEQ’s GWUDI guidance would be as follows: 1) if the wells are located within 200 feet of the H Canal, DEQ could require microscopic testing to check for surface indicators in the groundwater to check for direct influence, 2) if the wells are located between 200-500 feet from the H Canal, DEQ could require some type of evaluation, and 3) if the wells are located 500 feet or more from the H Canal, DEQ could waive the GWUDI review and no further evaluation may be needed. It is recommended that the two new wells be located as far as possible away from the H Canal, but not closer than 500 feet to avoid potential additional evaluation for direct influence with surface water. Figure 7-6 illustrates various setback distances from the H Canal.  There is not a set standard for well separation distance for drawdown cone of depression interference. A minimum separation distance of 400 feet is recommended. As the area owned by the Urban Renewal Agency is large, it is recommended that one well be located in the northeast corner of each parcel. This would provide a separation distance of approximately 1,300 feet between the two wells. The proposed locations are conceptually shown in Figure 7-6. FIGURE 7-6: URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OWNED LAND WELL SETBACKS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-10  It is recommended that the new wells target the deeper aquifer zones, consistent with the City’s other domestic wells. Water quality data from the lower aquifer in this area is limited, as most nearby wells are completed in shallower zones. However, based on available data from the City’s existing deeper wells and limited results from other sources, the water quality in the deeper aquifer appears to be suitable for potable use. While some data suggest that nitrate-nitrogen levels may be elevated, none of the sampled concentrations exceed the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 mg/L. Given the limited dataset, further testing of deeper domestic wells before proceeding with the construction of a production well is recommended. Alternatively, a test well could be constructed.  Two alternative preliminary designs for the well holes are provided in Appendix L.  The deeper aquifer production zone recommended to be targeted for these two wells consists of fractured basalt strata. This type of aquifer strata can exhibit highly inhomogeneous hydraulic characteristics. Actual strata encountered during drilling could vary significantly from anticipated conditions observed at wells with similar depths in the City. This is, to some degree, a risk with all well drilling. However, the other City’s wells are fairly consistent both in lithology and performance, which may support the decision to forgo drilling a test well.  The proposed locations for the wells are not currently listed as points of diversion of the City’s water rights. A Transfer will be required prior to obtaining drilling permits for the wells. While the City is completing a transfer to add the PODs, the City should also consider consolidating its potable water rights to provide maximum flexibility in diverting water from each source.  Several approvals are required prior to bringing a new source online into a public drinking water system. See Appendix L for the complete list of approvals required. 7.2.5. Upper Pressure Zone Delivery and Storage Although the 2042 evaluation does not identify a delivery or storage deficit, the existing storage tanks and booster stations cannot serve the new UPZ while meeting the pressure planning criteria. Therefore, additional storage and delivery are needed to service the UPZ. Table 7-1 displays the storage analysis for the UPZ. To address the UPZ’s storage needs, a 1.50 MG storage tank is recommended on the west side of the UPZ adjacent to the new sources wells) discussed in the previous section. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-11 TABLE 7-1: UPZ STORAGE ANALYSIS The existing booster station at the Well #5 site, that services the MPZ, is in need of replacement. It is recommended that when these facilities are replaced, additional pumping capacity be built into the new booster facility to include service to the UPZ. In addition to this facility, new wells are recommended on the west side of the UPZ, see Section 7.2.4, with a new storage tank. A second booster station is recommended at this site to also service the UPZ. With two wells supplying the tank on the west side of the UPZ, it is recommended that this booster station also provide service to the MPZ. As mentioned before, the target HGL of the UPZ is 4,378 feet. It is recommended that the booster on the west side of the UPZ lead with the Well #5 Booster lagging for servicing the UPZ. For servicing the MPZ from the booster station on the west side of the UPZ, it is recommended that its target grade be 4,320 feet to not suppress the capacity of the other sources in the MPZ. The planned growth shows that the UPZ will be relatively small through the planning period. For smaller pressure zones, typically the max demand for the zone will be MDD plus required fire flow. The UPZ has a projected MDD of 322 gpm and a fire flow requirement of 3,500 gpm for industrial areas. As it is unknown which booster station will be constructed first, nor when the two UPZ boosters will be connected with the recommended piping discussed in 7.2.3, it is recommended that each of these boosters be constructed with a firm capacity of 4,000 gpm. This should be evaluated in further detail during the preliminary design of each booster station. For the capacity of the new booster station on the west side of the UPZ, it is recommended that it be constructed with a capacity of 3,000 gpm of service to the MPZ. 7.2.6. Alley Waterline Alternatives The City has approximately 16.2 miles of waterlines situated in narrow alleyways. These alleyways have a typical width of 15 and 20 feet and are crowded with utilities such as sewer, which typically does not allow for the required horizontal potable and non-potable separation distance required per IDAPA code 58.01.08. The City also has approximately 7.8 miles of waterline located in backyards. Figure 7-7 shows the waterlines located in alleyways and backyards. A significant portion of the City’s waterline system is aging and will need to be replaced in the near future. There are two alternatives for the replacement of these waterlines. This evaluation focuses on waterlines in alleyways and is assumed similar for waterlines located in backyards. Year 2042 ADD (gpm) 136 MDD (gpm) 322 Operational Storage2 0.05 Peaking Storage3 0.07 Fire Storage4 0.84 Emergency Storage5 0.07 Total Storage Required 1.02 Total Storage Available 0 Storage Surplus / Deficit (1.02) Storage Analysis (all values in MG)1 1. ADD = average day demand; MDD = maximum day demand; MG = million gallons; MGD = million gallons per day 4. Assumes 3500 gpm for 4 hours 5. Assumes 8 hours of ADD 2. Assumes 10% of MDD for operational storage 3. Assumes 15% of MDD for peaking storage Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-12  Alternative 1 – Relocate waterlines to main roads  Alternative 2 – Replace waterlines in alleyways and work with the Idaho DEQ for approval of less separation distances when required The cost implication of replacing the waterlines in the alleyways and roadways was evaluated and is presented in Table 7-2. The estimated cost to relocate alleyway waterlines to the road is approximately double the cost to replace them in the alleys. This is primarily due to the added cost of rerouting the service lines to the front of houses and asphalt restoration. The cost analysis showed that relocating alleyway waterlines to the road would be $55.7 million dollars more expensive overall, or $650 more per linear foot compared to replacing them in the alleyways. Due to the significant cost and burden this would cause the City, Keller Associates recommends the City explore Alternative 2 and work with DEQ when alternative separation distances are required. FIGURE 7-7: ALLEY WATERLINES Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-13 TABLE 7-2: RELOCATING ALLEY WATERLINES TO MAIN ROAD COST IMPLICATION 7.2.7. Watco Tank System Alternatives The Watco system includes a well and an elevated 250,000-gallon tank, which has been documented by the City as significantly deteriorated. A 2020 inspection by Potable Divers, Inc. found that the tank is leaking and has severe interior corrosion. Additionally, the tank is severely undersized for the system's demands. The well facility is also deteriorated due to age. Given these issues, the following alternatives have been developed to replace the Watco system (Table 7-3 summarizes their respective cost estimates; detailed cost estimates are provided in Appendix  Alternative 1 – New Watco Transmission Line, Tank, and Booster Station: This alternative involves constructing a new 1.25 MG pre-stressed concrete tank and booster station on a City-owned parcel south of Highway 30, near the Watco system. The tank would be filled by a 6-inch transmission line, approximately two miles long, that would connect into the City’s MPZ. The maximum daily demand (MDD) for the Watco system is 172 gpm, which would not significantly impact MPZ operations but would accelerate the need for additional supply in the system. This alternative is illustrated in Figure 7-8. General Line Item Roadway Quantity Alleyway Quantity Units Unit Price Roadway Cost (2025 Dollars) Alleyway Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Fittings, Hydrants, and Valves 1,760 1,760 LF 160 $ 281,600 $ 281,600 $ Connect to Existing Water Main - 8-inch Tapping Saddle and Valve 2 2 EA 8,500 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ Asphalt Surface Repair - 12-foot Width 1,760 80 LF 125 $ 220,000 $ 10,000 $ Gravel Surface Repair 0 1,680 LF 20 $ - $ 33,600 $ Utility Protection (road) 1,760 0 LF 7 $ 12,320 $ - $ Utility Protection (alley) 0 1,760 LF 11 $ - $ 19,360 $ New Service off Alley - 1" line, Meter, and Box 0 48 EA 5,000 $ - $ 240,000 $ New Service off Road - 1" line, Meter, Box, Curb/Gutter, Sidewalk, Landscaping, Fence Restoration, and Connection to Back of House 48 0 EA 14,000 $ 672,000 $ - $ Temporary Water Service 0 1,760 LF 30 $ - $ 52,800 $ 1,203,000 $ 654,400 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% 120,300 $ 65,500 $ 1,323,300 $ 719,900 $ Contingency 30% 397,000 $ 216,000 $ 1,720,300 $ 935,900 $ Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% 258,100 $ 140,400 $ 1,978,400 $ 1,076,300 $ Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% 494,600 $ 269,100 $ 2,473,000 $ 1,345,400 $ 1,127,600 $ 650 $ 85,555 55,700,000 $ Total Project Costs (rounded) Total Project Cost Difference Total Project Cost Difference per Linear Foot (rounded) Length of Waterline in Allies (LF) Total Budget Implication (rounded) Plans and Contract Documents Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Total Construction Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-14 FIGURE 7-8: WATCO ALTERNATIVE 1  Alternative 2 – New Watco Wells, Tank, and Booster Station This alternative also proposes a new 1.25 MG pre-stressed concrete tank and booster station on the City-owned parcel. However, the tank would be filled by the existing Watco well hole with a new pumping facility. For supply redundancy, the secondary well on site would be upgraded as well to supply the tank. This alternative is illustrated in Figure 7-9. FIGURE 7-9: WATCO ALTERNATIVE 2  Alternative 3 – Lease or Sell the Watco Water System This alternative would consist of the City leasing or selling the Watco water system to the industries that are currently served by the system. By leasing or selling the system, this alternative could reduce the City’s operational and financial burden of maintaining and upgrading the system. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-15  Alternative 4 – 36-inch Transmission Waterline This alternative would involve constructing a two-mile-long 36-inch transmission waterline to connect the Watco system to the MPZ. This alternative would place a larger burden on MPZ’s delivery, as it would need to meet both the Watco system’s MDD and fire flow requirements. Additionally, due to the length of the waterline, the water would be about 30 days older than the average MPZ water age. For these reasons, Alternative 4 is not a viable option, and it is excluded from further consideration. TABLE 7-3: WATCO ALTERNATIVE COST SUMMARY Both replacement alternatives are costly and face specific construction challenges. For Alternative 1, construction would involve extensive excavation and potential traffic disruptions along Highway 30. For Alternative 2, challenges would include coordination with the industries the Watco system serves and managing groundwater due to the area’s high-water table. Alternative 3, while less disruptive in terms of construction, may encounter political pushback. Given the complexity of these alternatives and the political sensitivity regarding the Watco system, the City is carefully evaluating the alternatives so that it aligns with their long-term goals. Therefore, an alternative was not selected to be included in the CIP. Appendix K contains detailed cost estimates for Alternatives 1 and 2. 7.3. SELECTED ALTERNATIVES USER RATE IMPACTS See Chapter 9 for the discussion on user rate impacts for Priority 1 projects. 7.4. SELECTED ALTERNATIVES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The potential environmental impacts of the recommended alternative are summarized in the following section. 7.4.1. Land Use / Prime Farmland / Formally Classified Lands The new UPZ well, tank, and booster station alternative will take place on private property that is currently being farmed but is owned by the Urban Renewal Agency and is slated for commercial development. All other alternatives will be on previously developed land. Many distribution improvements will take place within existing easements, roadways, and/or rights-of-way. Some of the new distribution waterlines will need easements but should not have an effect on land use. 7.4.2. Floodplains / Wetlands The selected alternative’s locations will be finalized during design. They are not expected to create new obstructions to the flood plain. It is assumed at this time that the improvements will not be located in wetland areas. Further analysis will be completed as these projects develop. 7.4.3. Cultural, Biological, and Water Resources Improvements being evaluated will occur on private property that is being developed or on previously disturbed land. It is not anticipated that they will interfere with cultural, biological, or water resources. Further analysis will be completed as these projects develop. Alternative Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Description Transmission Line, Tank, and Booster New Well Facility, Tank, and Booster Station Lease / Sell System Total Project Cost1 $16.73 M $20.35 M Potential for Revenue 1) Costs are in 2025 dollars. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 7-16 7.4.4. Socio-Economic Conditions Alternatives are not anticipated to have a disproportionate effect on any segment of the population (economic, social, or cultural status). The main economic effect is the cost of the alternatives. 7.4.5. Land Requirements The UPZ wells, tank, and booster station will require additional land for construction that is not currently owned by the City. The City has identified land owned by the Urban Renewal Agency that can likely be acquired for this project. Beyond this project, the remainder of the projects will take place on land already owned by the City or within public right-of-way. Some distribution pipeline projects may require easements or dedication of right-of-way by future developments. It is recommended that the City work with developers to provide adequate / additional easements where necessary. 7.4.6. Potential Construction Challenges The City has noted high groundwater near the Snake River, which may impact construction of projects near the river. Construction plans near the river should include techniques to effectively manage excavation, and dewatering. Construction plans for any of the alternatives should also include provisions to control dust and runoff. Additionally, replacing distribution waterlines in narrow alleyway easements will require additional design considerations and careful excavation to avoid utility conflicts as well as working with DEQ for less horizontal potable / non-potable utility separation when required. 7.4.7. Sustainability Considerations Sustainability considerations will be made as the selected alternatives develop in the future. Some of these sustainability elements that will be considered would be high efficiency lighting, continued use of VFDs, installation of energy efficient motors/pumps, and continued use of SCADA. For the distribution system alternatives, trenchless pipeline installation construction methods should be evaluated where applicable. It is also recommended that the City continue to update and maintain its GIS asset inventory as projects or modifications to the system are completed. Chapter 9 provides additional information regarding Sustainability (Green) Infrastructure efforts specific to this plan and DEQ grant. TABLE 7-4: ALTERNATIVES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TABLE Environmental Criteria Well / Booster / Storage Alternatives Distribution Alternatives Land Use/ Prime Farmland / Formally Classified Lands No Impact No Impact Floodplains / Wetlands No Impact No Impact Cultural, Biological, and Water Resources No Impact No Impact Socio-Economic Conditions May impact user rates May impact user rates Land Requirements Limited Impact Limited Impact Potential Construction Challenges High Water Table High Water Table and Narrow allies with utility conflicts Sustainability Considerations No Impact No Impact Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 8-1 CHAPTER 8 - FUTURE HYDRAULIC MODEL ANALYSIS The selected alternatives and projected growth were added to the computer hydraulic model for the City’s water system to evaluate future performance under peak hour demand (PHD) and maximum day demand (MDD) plus fire flow. The results of this future evaluation are summarized in this chapter. This chapter also provides a buildout pipe network for the area within the system’s planning boundary. 8.1. FUTURE MODEL DEVELOPMENT A future (2042) model was created for the system that included the anticipated future growth and demands. The recommended alternatives (see Chapters 3 and 7) were also modeled, which included updated Booster Stations 4 and 5, the two new wells in the Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ), a new tank and booster station adjacent to the two new wells, and two pressure reducing valves (PRVs) and the piping to separate the two pressure zones. Several pipeline improvements to correct fire flow deficiencies were also added to the model, these pipeline projects are detailed in the capital improvement plan (CIP) in Chapter 9. The future system can be seen in Figure 8-1. FIGURE 8-1: BURLEY FUTURE SYSTEM Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 8-2 8.2. FUTURE SYSTEM EVALUATION This section includes a summary of the future (2042) distribution system’s hydraulic evaluation to meet pressure and fire flow requirements under future demands. This evaluation was completed with the hydraulic model that was developed, loaded, and previously calibrated as discussed in this chapter and Chapter 6. The planning criteria for pressure and fire flow requirements are provided in Chapter 4. 8.2.1. Future PHD Pressures The water model was exercised to evaluate pressures in the distribution system under PHD at firm capacity largest booster pump off). A weeklong MDD extended period simulation (EPS) was modeled for the future system to observe performance throughout the day and to check system pressures during peak hour. Figure 8-2 and Figure 8-3 show the tank levels and booster station discharge pressure results from the MDD EPS respectively. Each of the tanks are able to recover to their high level setpoints throughout the EPS. Tank 4 and Tank 7 recover quickly, while Tank 5 is estimated to recover in approximately 12 hours. The model does not show any issues foreseen with refilling the tanks during an MDD event. Each of the booster stations are able to meet their target discharge pressure throughout the MDD EPS with only slight fluctuations in the Well 5 and new booster to the MPZ located by the two new wells. The PHD pressures from the MDD EPS model simulation are presented in Figure 8-4. These results are under firm pumping capacity. Under this scenario the system is able to maintain pressures above the required 40 psi minimum. FIGURE 8-2: MDD EPS TANK LEVEL RESULTS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 8-3 FIGURE 8-3: MDD EPS BOOSTER STATION VFD RESULTS FIGURE 8-4: FUTURE PHD Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 8-4 8.2.2. Future Available Fire Flow The future MDD plus fire flow model scenario was run at firm capacity to evaluate the available fire flow throughout the future system. This scenario was also modeled with the system recommendations given in Chapters 3 and 7 and the CIP pipes detailed in Chapter 9 under firm capacity. The results of this scenario are presented in the following figures. With the recommended improvements, the majority of the system is able to meet its required fire flow. There are several locations that do not meet the required fire flow planning criteria. These locations are on private waterlines not owned by the City. It is recommended that the City reach out to the owners of these private waterlines with insufficient fire flow to discuss potential needed upgrades. FIGURE 8-5: FUTURE MEETS REQ’D FIRE FLOW Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 8-5 FIGURE 8-6: FUTURE AFF 8.3. BUILDOUT PIPE NETWORK A buildout model was created including the future system and a general mainline pipe network for the system’s planning boundary. Figure 8-7 shows the system’s buildout pipe network. Phasing of development is common, resulting in temporary dead-end waterlines or parts of the system that are not looped. It is recommended that the City model each proposed development, per phase, to check that proposed piping can provide adequate pressures and fire flows. Adjustment to development or the proposed pipe network may be required to accommodate phasing. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 8-6 FIGURE 8-7: BURLEY BUILDOUT SYSTEM Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-1 CHAPTER 9 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The alternatives evaluated in Chapter 7 helped the City select the improvements to correct supply, delivery, distribution, and storage needs within the system. There are several other recommended improvements that are straightforward that did not require an alternative evaluation. This chapter summarizes all recommended improvements, provides cost estimates for each improvement, provides an approximate timeline for their implementation, and establishes annual replacement budgets for existing infrastructure in the water system. The complete list of improvement projects and accompanying schedule is called the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Information on financing options and rate implications is also discussed. 9.1. PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA As discussed in the previous chapters, the recommended improvements to the water system include new wells, distribution system pipes, booster stations, and storage facilities. The improvements have been prioritized, with City input, as outlined in Table 9-1. Priorities are from highest to lowest Additional water transmission mains to serve new connections were assumed to be constructed by development as new areas are incorporated into the system and are not reflected as capital improvement projects. TABLE 9-1: PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA 9.2. BASIS FOR COST ESTIMATES Capital costs developed for the recommended improvements are Class 4 estimates as defined by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE). Actual construction costs may differ from the estimates presented, depending on specific design requirements and the economic climate when a project is bid. The range of accuracy for a Class 4 cost estimate is broad but reflects typical estimate levels for planning work. As a result, the final project costs will likely vary from the estimates presented in this document. The costs are based on Keller’s perception of current conditions at the project location and additional design/administration considerations. The total estimated probable project costs include construction costs, contractor markups, 30% contingency (which is typical of a planning-level estimate), and design/administration costs. Cost estimates should be refined during the preliminary and final design phases of each project. 9.3. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The summary of recommended CIP improvements, their estimated costs, and triggers are provided in Table 9-2. Individual cost sheets with additional details are included in Appendix M. Figure 9-1 shows the locations of the CIP projects and a full-size figure can be found in Appendix M. Some of the additional details include a description of need for the project, project objectives, and design considerations. Priority 1 2 3 4 - Address commercial and residential fire flow deficiencies with more than 60% AFF - Improvements to accommodate future growth Description - Address facilities with conditions concerns - Address downtown fire flow deficiencies - Create Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ) - Address supply and delivery for the UPZ - Address commercial and residential fire flow deficiencies with less than 60% AFF Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-2 TABLE 9-2: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1.1 Well 5 and Booster Station Replacement (MPZ) Facility has reached useful life 7,400,000 $ 1.2 Well 4, Booster Station, and Tank Improvements Facility has reached useful life 8,069,000 $ 1.3 Well 2, 3, and 6 Improvements Security and electrical conditions 631,000 $ 1.4 ITD Highway 30 Waterline Replacement Downtown FF deficiencies/ITD project 4,869,000 $ 1.5 Downtown Waterline Replacement Downtown FF deficiencies 4,119,000 $ 1.6 S 600 W and 400 South Road Waterline Improvements Commercial FF deficiencies 4,743,000 $ 29,831,000 $ 2.1 Water Master Plan Update Recommended timeline 250,000 $ 2.2 UPZ West Well, Tank, and Booster Station UPZ creation 14,195,000 $ 2.3 UPZ West Well 2 UPZ supply redundancy 4,684,000 $ 2.4 Booster Station 5 UPZ Improvements UPZ creation 515,000 $ 2.5 UPZ Waterline Improvements UPZ creation 9,468,000 $ 29,112,000 $ 3.1 Water Master Plan Update Recommended timeline 250,000 $ 3.2 Airport Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 2,273,000 $ 3.3 Park and W Railroad Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 3,898,000 $ 3.4 South of Railroad Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 2,388,000 $ 3.5 North Overland Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 3,365,000 $ 3.6 Overland Shopping Center Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 3,855,000 $ 3.7 East Railroad Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 2,816,000 $ 3.8 South Overland Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 3,889,000 $ 3.9 Miller and Oakley Ave Alley Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 2,631,000 $ 3.10 Hiland Ave Subdivision Waterline Addition Commercial FF deficiencies 242,000 $ 3.11 E 16th Street Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 3,804,000 $ 29,411,000 $ 4.1 Water Master Plan Update Recommended timeline 250,000 $ 4.2 Elba and Malta Ave Alley Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 2,279,000 $ 4.3 Syringa Plaza Apartments Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 1,651,000 $ 4.4 Occidental, Yale, Schodde Alley Waterline Replacment Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 3,904,000 $ 4.5 E 3rd Street Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 689,000 $ 4.6 Burton and Conant From 13th to 16th Street Alley Waterline Replacement Residential FF deficiencies 2,609,000 $ 4.7 Burton and Conant from 5th to 9th Street Alley Waterline Replacment Residential FF deficiencies 2,178,000 $ 4.8 Hansen and Normal Alley Waterline Replacement Residential FF deficiencies 3,875,000 $ 4.9 Burton, Conant, and Miller from 16th to 21st Street Alley Waterline Replacement Residential FF deficiencies 3,680,000 $ 21,115,000 $ 109,469,000 $ ID# Priority 3 Improvements (2036 - 2042) Priority 2 Improvements (2032-2035) Priority 1 Improvements (2026-2031) Total Estimated Cost (2025 Dollars) Project Trigger Project Name Total Priority 1 Improvements (rounded) TOTAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COSTS (rounded) Total Priority 2 Improvements (rounded) Total Priority 3 Improvements (rounded) Total Priority 4 Improvements (rounded) The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein.” Priority 4 Improvements (2036 - 2042) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-3 FIGURE 9-1: CIP MAP Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-4 9.4. PRIORITY 1 PROJECTS Priority 1 CIP projects are planned to be completed within the next 0-5 years. These projects address condition concerns, booster station upgrades, and downtown fire flow deficiencies. The priority 1 projects are summarized as follows. See Appendix M for details regarding the remaining priority 2-4 projects. CIP 1.1 – Booster Station 5 Replacement (MPZ) The Well 5 and Booster Station facility has reached the end of its useful life with several deficiencies such as a leaking roof, broken AC, and outdated Motor Control Center (MCC). This project is needed to construct a new well and booster station facility to pump into the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ) with consideration for future improvements to add pumping capacity to the Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ) with CIP project 2.4. CIP 1.2 – Well 4, Booster Station, and Tank Improvements The Well 4 and Booster Station facility has reached the end of its useful life with deficiencies such as deteriorating building conditions as well as outdated electrical and HVAC equipment and outdated controls. Booster pumps 3 and 4 also need to be replaced. Additionally, Tank 4 has several deficiencies such as corrosion, leaks, and lacking fall protection. This project is needed to construct a new pumping facility and complete Tank 4 improvements. CIP 1.3 – Well 2, 3, and 6 Improvements Well 2 was originally constructed in 1986 and the MCC and pump starters have reached the end of their useful life. In addition, there are two exterior windows that need to be removed and bricked in for security. This project will address these improvements. Well 3’s pump starters have reached the end of their useful like and there are several windows that need to be removed and bricked in for security. There is also a set of wooden doors that should be removed and sealed with bricks for security. This project will address these improvements. Well 6’s electrical panels and pump starters have reached the end of their useful life. Additionally, there is a small gap between the fence and gate that needs to be closed for security. This project will address these improvements. CIP 1.4 – ITD Highway 30 Waterline Replacement The commercial area surrounding Highway 30 (Main Street) does not meet fire flow requirements. This project was identified to upsize the pipelines so that a minimum of 2,500 gpm is provided to the area. This project is scheduled to take place in conjunction with an ITD roadway project for Highway 30. CIP 1.5 – Downtown Waterline Replacement The commercial and residential area surrounding W 13th Street does not meet fire flow requirements. This project was identified to increase fire flow to a minimum of 2,500 and 1,000 gpm to the respective commercial and residential areas. CIP 1.6 – S 600 W and 400 South Road Waterline Improvements The commercial area surrounding S 600 West and 400 South Roads does not meet fire flow requirements. The project was identified to upsize undersized pipelines to provide the 2,500 gpm fire flow requirements. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-5 9.5. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS CIP Projects 1.1 and 1.2 will require DEQ approval due to the design and construction of new well and booster facilities. Since both projects will take place on existing sites, they are not expected to involve special permitting or land acquisition. In contrast, CIP Project 1.3, which involves replacing smaller equipment in kind, approvals from DEQ are not anticipated. The City may require electrical and building permits. CIP Project 1.4 will need additional ITD permitting and coordination, as it is planned to run concurrently with an ITD roadway project. Finally, CIP Project 1.5, which entails boring across Highway 27, is also anticipated to require ITD permitting. Approval of facilities that are not simple water line extensions will require Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) approvals for the preliminary engineering report (PER) and final plans and specifications. Simple water line projects could be submitted to DEQ for approval or be approved by a Qualified Licensed Professional Engineer (QLPE). 9.6. SUSTAINABILITY CONSIDERATIONS This section discusses the Sustainability (Green) Infrastructure efforts specific to this study and the DEQ grant. 9.6.1. Updated CIP and Budget This study updates the City’s CIP, project budgets, and establishes a schedule for the Priority 1 CIP projects as documented in this chapter and in the associated appendices. Planning for future projects years and even decades in advance allows the City to save for projects over significant amounts of time and allocate funds in appropriate manners, lessening the financial burden to users. 9.6.2. Updated Rate Study Current rates are usage based and are sufficient to maintain and operate the existing water system as outlined in Chapter 3. User rate impacts are discussed for fully and partially funding the Priority 1 improvements based on obtaining loans for the Priority 1 CIP budget under Section 9.8.2. of this chapter. 9.6.3. Water System Consolidation The City of Heyburn is a small town of approximately 3,700 people located north of the Snake River adjacent to the City of Burley. Currently, Heyburn does have a connection to the Burley-Heyburn Industrial Park (BHIP) Tank that can fill the tank. However, further emergency interconnections are unlikely because the cities have differing target hydraulic grades. The City of Burley’s hydraulic grade is approximately 50 feet higher than Heyburn’s. Therefore, an emergency connection would only likely benefit Heyburn. 9.6.4. Water Meter Installations The City reported in Chapter 4 several un-metered connections including: City buildings, park facilities and irrigation, Fair Grounds, hydrant flushing, fire truck filling, water lube well pumps, etc. Chapter 4 recommends installing meters for the unmetered buildings and parks and tracking water usage for the other un-metered uses to provide a more realistic picture of the unaccounted water. Improved water metering and tracking can also provide insights into water usage patterns and lead to more efficient management when irregular usage patterns occur. Additionally, in section 9.8. water meter replacement budget is recommended for the City to track and replace water meters that are past their useful life. Over time water meters can become less accurate due to usage and wear, affecting billing accuracy. By implementing the replacement budget, the City can provide more consistent and accurate metering. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-6 9.6.5. Maintaining Asset Management System The City maintains a GIS-based asset management system of the water system. The system was built with a GPS survey of all water features (water meters, valves, fire hydrants, supply/storage facilities) which was used to develop a formal GIS asset inventory database for the water system. The City has found great use in this asset system and continues to maintain it. During this study, the GIS was used to check and update the hydraulic computer model to improve results and accuracy of this study. Field checks were also performed. It is recommended that the City continue to update the GIS system as projects are completed or changes to the system are made to maintain accurate records. 9.6.6. High-Efficiency Lighting High-efficiency lighting and lighting controls are recommended for all improvements and new facilities. 9.6.7. Class A Reclaimed Water System Currently, the City discharges Class A treated water to the Snake River. Connecting this the treated water to the low-pressure irrigation system would require substantial infrastructure improvements, including approximately 1,400 feet of new pipeline and 3,000 feet of upsized waterlines to accommodate the large point source. However, this connection would only reduce irrigation water production, as the low-pressure irrigation system is separate from the potable water system. Additional infrastructure would be required to serve users that irrigate with potable water. The City requires new developments to provide a separate pressure irrigation system. 9.6.8. Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) and Efficient Motors The City’s existing booster pumps are equipped with VFDs. It is recommended that new pumps be equipped with VFDs and energy efficient motors that meet National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Premium specifications. 9.6.9. City SCADA System The existing water facilities have been tied into this network. New facilities will also be tied into the SCADA system. The SCADA system is used to manage and optimize infrastructure operations. 9.7. FUNDING OPTIONS Some of the CIP projects may be funded by development as growth occurs and new facilities are needed to meet increasing demands. Methods of funding the projects that will not be funded by development are available should the City choose to investigate, including the following: 9.7.1. Cash Funding The City could consider raising rates to cash fund the improvements. This would require the least total cash outlay; however, the rates would be higher than if they were spread over a long-term loan, which could be a significant hardship. 9.7.2. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (State Revolving Fund) The State Revolving Fund (SRF) program is funded by a combination of repayment of loans previously made by DEQ and grant money supplied by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Owners of public water systems can apply for SRF funds annually through a competitive application process. Applications are ranked by state officials based on need, sustainability, water quality improvements, and other criteria. Davis-Bacon Wage Act and American Iron and Steel Requirements apply. Applicants may qualify for principal forgiveness or other subsidy programs. DEQ is required to commit a significant percentage of available loan funds to sustainable, energy efficient, and “green” infrastructure improvements. Consequently, elements that meet the “green” Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-7 infrastructure qualifications may receive priority for funding. Authorization to indebt the City is required through either a judicial confirmation or voter approval. The SRF program in recent years has not received as much funding as in the past. This program has become increasingly competitive with many jurisdictions lobbying for funding for their infrastructure needs. It is recommended that the City not count on this source of funding as a reliable option to fund future projects. 9.7.3. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (Section 595) The USACE can sometimes offer funding for water-related infrastructure projects to supplement funding from DEQ or USDA-RD. Funding availability depends on an appropriation from Congress and varies from year to year. Costs are typically shared with a 25 percent local match required. 9.7.4. Idaho Bond Bank The Idaho Bond Bank is a state level entity that lends money to local governments within the state, with the goal of providing funds for their infrastructure needs and access to the capital markets at competitive interest rates. Under the Idaho Bond Bank program (IBBA), a municipality obtains a loan from the Bond Bank secured by either the municipality's bond or a loan agreement with the Bond Bank. The Bond Bank pools several loans to municipalities into one bond issue. The municipalities then repay the loan, and those repayments are used to repay the revenue bonds. The Bond Bank can obtain better credit ratings, more attractive interest rates, and lower underwriting costs than municipalities could achieve individually within the municipal bond market. The Bond Bank is able to pledge certain state funds as additional security for its bonds, further reducing interest costs. Additionally, the Idaho Bond Bank Authority can open doors to municipalities that were previously barred from the capital markets due to the prohibitive costs of financing or challenging credit situations. 9.7.5. Local and Private In addition to federal and state funding programs, there are local and private funding sources available to communities to fund. Some of these include a Local Improvement District (LID), the municipal bond market with voter approval or judicial confirmation, a Business Improvement District (BID), urban renewal district, connection fees, development agreements with developers, and others. 9.8. ANNUAL BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS This section documents recommended annual replacement budgets for the existing system infrastructure as it ages, as well as user rate impacts for funding the Priority 1 projects 9.8.1. Annual Replacement Budgets In addition to the CIP projects, the City should prepare for the replacement of existing infrastructure as it ages. Appendix N includes breakdowns of the annual replacement budgets and assumptions. Annual replacement budgets were estimated for the following system components: ➢ Water Service Meters ➢ Fire Hydrants ➢ Well Facilities ➢ Booster Stations ➢ Storage Tanks ➢ Pipelines The annual cost of each component was estimated by dividing the total component replacement cost by the approximate useful life of the component. For the pipeline replacement, a target of Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-8 replacing 1% of the existing system piping per year was selected. This equates to replacing approximately 0.82 miles of pipe every year. It is recommended the City target older areas of town with known issues for replacement. The City could also target pipelines identified in the CIP as needing to be replaced with this fund. A summary of the annual replacement budget is provided in Table 9-3. Appendix N includes breakdowns of the estimated costs. TABLE 9-3: ANNUAL REPLACEMENT BUDGETS As shown, the total annual replacement budget is approximately $4.22 million. To mitigate potential rate increases necessary to fully fund the replacement budget, replacement budgets can be phased in overtime. 9.8.2. Operating Revenues/Expenses and User Rate Impacts The City provided financial audits for the 2020 through 2022 fiscal years. Using the financial information provided, existing annual operating expenses and revenues were calculated, which showed the change in fund balance and net reserve for each fiscal year. As can be seen in Table 9-4, the City has experienced a positive change in fund balance (total revenues minus total expenditures) in recent years. This is also true when depreciation is considered; depreciation is an accounting adjustment and does not represent an actual transfer of money out of the utility. The positive net reserve indicates that the City is currently in sound financial standing. See Figure 9-2 for a visual representation of the financial information. Category Annual Budget2 Water Meters 149,000 $ Fire Hydrants 240,000 $ Well Facilities 525,000 $ Booster Stations 338,000 $ Storage Tanks 135,000 $ Subtotal 1,387,000 $ Pipeline Replacements1 2,832,000 $ Total Annual Replacement Budget 4,219,000 $ Annual Replacement Budget Summary 1) Assumes replacing 1% of the system is replaced every year. 2) Mobilization, contingency, professional engineering fees are included for well facilities, booster stations, storage tanks, and pipeline replacements. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-9 TABLE 9-4: HISTORICAL REVENUE & EXPENDITURES FIGURE 9-2: HISTORICAL REVENUE & EXPENDITURES Financials Fiscal Year FY2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Average User Rate (Residential)1 $26.40 $26.40 $26.40 Charges for Services 2,896,486 $ 3,015,689 $ 2,999,110 $ Miscellaneous Service Revenue 52,726 $ 63,763 $ 15,835 $ Grant Revenue - $ - $ - $ Capital Contributions 888,500 $ 115,000 $ 669,000 $ Interest Income 7,767 $ 2,396 $ 4,018 $ Total Revenues 3,845,479 $ 3,196,848 $ 3,687,963 $ Salaries & Benefits 658,759 $ 615,189 $ 815,304 $ Contractor Services 149,083 $ 153,031 $ 156,934 $ Operations & Maintenance 945,680 $ 880,657 $ 1,248,430 $ Interest Expense 35,056 $ 27,316 $ 26,056 $ Miscellaneous3 661,005 $ 155,737 $ 171,896 $ Total Expenditures 2,449,583 $ 1,831,930 $ 2,418,620 $ Change in Fund Balance 1,395,896 $ 1,364,918 $ 1,269,343 $ Depreciation2 311,777 $ 529,144 $ 589,087 $ Total Expenditures + Depreciation 2,761,360 $ 2,361,074 $ 3,007,707 $ Net Reserve $1,084,119 $835,774 $680,256 3) Miscellaneous Expenditures includes miscellaneous expense, bad debts, conservation, tax equivalents paid to the General Fund, administrative services, and legal services. Historic Data Revenues Expenditures 1) User rate is the base rate. An additional $1.29 per 1000 gallons is also charged. 2) Depreciation is an accounting adjustment; does not represent an actual transfer of money out of the utility. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-10 The City could choose to debt finance the existing system Priority 1 improvements identified previously in Table 9-2: Capital Improvement Plan. Based on typical DEQ SRF loan terms, Table 9- 5 details the impact on water utility user rates if the projects were fully funded or partially funded. Fully funding the Priority 1 projects would result in a base user rate increase of about $26.38 to offset the annual loan payment. This increase is based on the CIP Priority 1 project costs since there is not an increase in O&M costs because the projects consist of replacing existing facilities or pipelines. Fully funding the projects equates to a total new rate of $52.78, or an approximate 99.9% user rate increase. Nearly doubling the water base rate could cause hardship for the City’s water customers, and it is recommended the City seek additional funding and grants to supplement these project costs. If the City was able to secure 50% of the funding through grants, this would equate to a new rate of $39.59 (increase of $13.19 or 50.0%). TABLE 9-5: USER RATE ANALYSIS Additional information about user costs can be found in Appendix F. This was a very simple rate analysis that did not consider several factors that a full rate study would consider. The City should complete a more detailed rate study and model to assess future rate increases. The rate study at a minimum should evaluate fully funding short-lived assets replacement needs, long-term infrastructure replacement, more clearly define operating revenues and expenses, and integrate planned CIP projects. Water Rate Evaluation Fully Funded Priority 1 Improvements 50% Grant Funded Priority 1 Improvements Existing Water Bill $26.40 $26.40 Priority 1 Project Cost $29,831,000 $29,831,000 Grants $0 $14,915,500 Funding Source/s DEQ DEQ Loan Principle $29,831,000 $14,915,500 Interest Rate 2.13% 2.13% Term (yrs) 30 30 Annual Payment $1,354,954 $677,477 User Rate Increase $26.38 $13.19 Total Annual O&M $0 $0 User Rate for O&M $0 $0 User Rate Increase (O&M Included) $26.38 $13.19 User Rate Percent Increase 99.9% 50.0% Total New Water Bill $52.78 $39.59 Loan Evaluation Additional O&M 1 1) Priority 1 projects consist of infrastrucutre replacements and are not expected to casue a significant increase in O&M. Rate Impacts 2) Calculations for the user rate increase are based on 4,281 water accounts. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER MASTER PLAN CITY OF BURLEY I KA 221232-001 9-11 9.8.3. Operational Staffing Summary The City currently staffs six employees that operate and oversee the water system. Table 9-6 provides a breakdown of the current staffing. The water superintendent has departmental oversight while the water foreman has oversight of the operator daily duties. These duties include, but are not limited to, the repair and replacement of water mains, water services, water meters, fire hydrants, as well as the maintenance of pumps, valves and other related equipment. TABLE 9-6: CURRENT STAFFING Job Title No. of Employees Water Superintendent 1 Water Foreman 1 Water Operator 4 In addition, the City has several programs such as valve exercising and fire hydrant replacement programs. The City recently added an additional water operator in 2024. The City believes that additional personnel will not be required to maintain the additional facilities identified in the CIP at this point but will monitor staff workload moving forward and adjust as needed. 9.9. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION The planning elements used as the basis for the recommendations and CIP projects in this plan may evolve over time and it is recommended that the City continue to maintain current models of the system and review each improvement in more detail a year or two ahead of implementing individual capital improvements. By reviewing upcoming improvements ahead of time, it will provide the City an opportunity to refine project scopes and budget. A more comprehensive update of the master plan is recommended every 5 years to allow for the City to re-assess needs, priorities, and properly allocate budgets to address system deficiencies. The GIS mapping and hydraulic model should continuously be updated to reflect new development and improvements which occur to the system. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX A Full-Size Figures Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Washington Ave S 950 W S 800 W W Main St S 400 W E 100 S S 50 E State Hwy 27 Overland Ave W 400 S S 300 W S 100 W S 250 E W 100 S S 150 E S 200 W S 500 W W 300 S W 500 S W 200 S I- 84 Maxar Figure 2-10 Water Master Plan Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Planning Boundary Land Use Residential Commercial Industrial Special District City of Burley 0 1 2 Miles Path: J:\221232 Burley\001 - 2022 Water Master Plan\PLAN\z_GIS\MXDs\Report MXDs\Land Use & ISRB FF\Land Use and ISRB Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX B Environmental References Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX B.1 NRCS Soils Data Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Soil Map—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 1 of 4 4710000 4711000 4712000 4713000 4714000 4715000 4716000 4717000 4709000 4710000 4711000 4712000 4713000 4714000 4715000 4716000 4717000 264000 265000 266000 267000 268000 269000 270000 271000 272000 273000 274000 275000 276000 263000 264000 265000 266000 267000 268000 269000 270000 271000 272000 273000 274000 275000 276000 42° 34' 29'' N 113° 53' W 42° 34' 29'' N 113° 43' 20'' W 42° 29' 49'' N 113° 53' W 42° 29' 49'' N 113° 43' 20'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 2500 5000 10000 15000 Feet 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Meters Map Scale: 1:60,900 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Cassia County, Idaho, West Part Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 2, 2022 Soil Survey Area: Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Survey Area Data: Version 20, Sep 2, 2022 Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area boundaries. Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 17, 2021—Oct 21, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 2 of 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1 Paulmyers loam 17.8 0.2% 2 Paulmyers variant loam 748.8 6.6% 7 Aysees gravelly loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes 130.5 1.1% 10 Beetville loam 87.2 0.8% 12 Buko-Paniogue complex 795.5 7.0% 14 Declo sandy loam 229.5 2.0% 15 Declo loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 1,475.3 13.0% 16 Declo loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 98.9 0.9% 17 Declo loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 35.6 0.3% 20 Drax silt loam 174.2 1.5% 22 Escalante sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 388.8 3.4% 23 Escalante sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 155.9 1.4% 24 Escalante sandy loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 108.4 1.0% 27 Goose Creek silt loam 1,608.7 14.2% 28 Goose Creek silty clay loam 408.8 3.6% 29 Goose Creek silty clay loam, wet 198.3 1.7% 39 Paniogue-Buko complex 219.4 1.9% 40 Paulville clay loam 37.7 0.3% 41 Pits 303.4 2.7% 42 Pocatello silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 93.8 0.8% 43 Pocatello silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 3.9 0.0% 46 Portneuf silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 978.8 8.6% 47 Portneuf silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 230.2 2.0% 48 Portneuf silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 31.3 0.3% 49 Portneuf silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes 34.9 0.3% 67 Water 320.9 2.8% 71 Wodskow sandy loam 403.5 3.6% Soil Map—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 3 of 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 9,319.9 82.1% Totals for Area of Interest 11,350.9 100.0% Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1 Paulmyers sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 49.7 0.4% 2 Paulmyers loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 384.2 3.4% 3 Arloval loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 29.3 0.3% 9 Decker fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 187.7 1.7% 10 Decker loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 304.5 2.7% 11 Decker loam, saline, 0 to 2 percent slopes 4.6 0.0% 13 Eoyote fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 190.9 1.7% 14 Garsox silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 188.0 1.7% 30 Quincy loamy sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes 86.6 0.8% 34 Schodson loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes 7.3 0.1% 42 Tindahay sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 29.7 0.3% 47 Wodskow sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 180.6 1.6% 50 Woozle loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 65.4 0.6% 51 Water 322.4 2.8% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 2,030.9 17.9% Totals for Area of Interest 11,350.9 100.0% Soil Map—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 4 of 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Corrosion of Concrete—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 1 of 6 4710000 4711000 4712000 4713000 4714000 4715000 4716000 4717000 4709000 4710000 4711000 4712000 4713000 4714000 4715000 4716000 4717000 264000 265000 266000 267000 268000 269000 270000 271000 272000 273000 274000 275000 276000 263000 264000 265000 266000 267000 268000 269000 270000 271000 272000 273000 274000 275000 276000 42° 34' 29'' N 113° 53' W 42° 34' 29'' N 113° 43' 20'' W 42° 29' 49'' N 113° 53' W 42° 29' 49'' N 113° 43' 20'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 2500 5000 10000 15000 Feet 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Meters Map Scale: 1:60,900 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons High Moderate Low Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines High Moderate Low Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points High Moderate Low Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Cassia County, Idaho, West Part Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 2, 2022 Soil Survey Area: Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Survey Area Data: Version 20, Sep 2, 2022 Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area boundaries. Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 17, 2021—Oct 21, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Corrosion of Concrete—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 2 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Corrosion of Concrete Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1 Paulmyers loam Moderate 17.8 0.2% 2 Paulmyers variant loam High 748.8 6.6% 7 Aysees gravelly loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes Low 130.5 1.1% 10 Beetville loam Low 87.2 0.8% 12 Buko-Paniogue complex Low 795.5 7.0% 14 Declo sandy loam Moderate 229.5 2.0% 15 Declo loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Moderate 1,475.3 13.0% 16 Declo loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Moderate 98.9 0.9% 17 Declo loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes Moderate 35.6 0.3% 20 Drax silt loam Low 174.2 1.5% 22 Escalante sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Moderate 388.8 3.4% 23 Escalante sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Moderate 155.9 1.4% 24 Escalante sandy loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes Moderate 108.4 1.0% 27 Goose Creek silt loam Low 1,608.7 14.2% 28 Goose Creek silty clay loam Low 408.8 3.6% 29 Goose Creek silty clay loam, wet Low 198.3 1.7% 39 Paniogue-Buko complex Low 219.4 1.9% 40 Paulville clay loam Low 37.7 0.3% 41 Pits 303.4 2.7% 42 Pocatello silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes High 93.8 0.8% 43 Pocatello silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes High 3.9 0.0% 46 Portneuf silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Moderate 978.8 8.6% 47 Portneuf silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Moderate 230.2 2.0% 48 Portneuf silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes Moderate 31.3 0.3% 49 Portneuf silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes Moderate 34.9 0.3% Corrosion of Concrete—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 3 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 67 Water 320.9 2.8% 71 Wodskow sandy loam High 403.5 3.6% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 9,319.9 82.1% Totals for Area of Interest 11,350.9 100.0% Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1 Paulmyers sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Moderate 49.7 0.4% 2 Paulmyers loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Moderate 384.2 3.4% 3 Arloval loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Low 29.3 0.3% 9 Decker fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Moderate 187.7 1.7% 10 Decker loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Moderate 304.5 2.7% 11 Decker loam, saline, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 4.6 0.0% 13 Eoyote fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Low 190.9 1.7% 14 Garsox silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 188.0 1.7% 30 Quincy loamy sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes Low 86.6 0.8% 34 Schodson loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes Low 7.3 0.1% 42 Tindahay sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Low 29.7 0.3% 47 Wodskow sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Moderate 180.6 1.6% 50 Woozle loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Low 65.4 0.6% 51 Water 322.4 2.8% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 2,030.9 17.9% Totals for Area of Interest 11,350.9 100.0% Corrosion of Concrete—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 4 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Description "Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens concrete. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The concrete in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the concrete in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low," "moderate," or "high." Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be rendered. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding percent composition is recorded. A percent composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values for the components in a map unit. For each group, percent composition is set to the sum of the percent composition of all components participating in that group. These groups now represent "conditions" rather than components. The attribute value associated with the group with the highest cumulative percent composition is returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative percent composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher group value should be returned in the case of a percent composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant condition throughout the map unit only when no tie has occurred. Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Components whose percent composition is below the cutoff value will not be considered. If no cutoff value is specified, all components in the database will be considered. The data for some contrasting soils of minor extent may not be in the database, and therefore are not considered. Corrosion of Concrete—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 5 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Tie-break Rule: Higher The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a percent composition tie. Corrosion of Concrete—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 6 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Corrosion of Steel—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 1 of 6 4710000 4711000 4712000 4713000 4714000 4715000 4716000 4717000 4709000 4710000 4711000 4712000 4713000 4714000 4715000 4716000 4717000 264000 265000 266000 267000 268000 269000 270000 271000 272000 273000 274000 275000 276000 263000 264000 265000 266000 267000 268000 269000 270000 271000 272000 273000 274000 275000 276000 42° 34' 29'' N 113° 53' W 42° 34' 29'' N 113° 43' 20'' W 42° 29' 49'' N 113° 53' W 42° 29' 49'' N 113° 43' 20'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 2500 5000 10000 15000 Feet 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Meters Map Scale: 1:60,900 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons High Moderate Low Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines High Moderate Low Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points High Moderate Low Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Cassia County, Idaho, West Part Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 2, 2022 Soil Survey Area: Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Survey Area Data: Version 20, Sep 2, 2022 Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area boundaries. Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 17, 2021—Oct 21, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Corrosion of Steel—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 2 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Corrosion of Steel Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1 Paulmyers loam High 17.8 0.2% 2 Paulmyers variant loam High 748.8 6.6% 7 Aysees gravelly loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes Moderate 130.5 1.1% 10 Beetville loam Moderate 87.2 0.8% 12 Buko-Paniogue complex High 795.5 7.0% 14 Declo sandy loam Moderate 229.5 2.0% 15 Declo loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Moderate 1,475.3 13.0% 16 Declo loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Moderate 98.9 0.9% 17 Declo loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes Moderate 35.6 0.3% 20 Drax silt loam Moderate 174.2 1.5% 22 Escalante sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Moderate 388.8 3.4% 23 Escalante sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Moderate 155.9 1.4% 24 Escalante sandy loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes Moderate 108.4 1.0% 27 Goose Creek silt loam Moderate 1,608.7 14.2% 28 Goose Creek silty clay loam Moderate 408.8 3.6% 29 Goose Creek silty clay loam, wet High 198.3 1.7% 39 Paniogue-Buko complex High 219.4 1.9% 40 Paulville clay loam Moderate 37.7 0.3% 41 Pits 303.4 2.7% 42 Pocatello silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes High 93.8 0.8% 43 Pocatello silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes High 3.9 0.0% 46 Portneuf silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes High 978.8 8.6% 47 Portneuf silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes High 230.2 2.0% 48 Portneuf silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes High 31.3 0.3% 49 Portneuf silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes High 34.9 0.3% Corrosion of Steel—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 3 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 67 Water 320.9 2.8% 71 Wodskow sandy loam High 403.5 3.6% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 9,319.9 82.1% Totals for Area of Interest 11,350.9 100.0% Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1 Paulmyers sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 49.7 0.4% 2 Paulmyers loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 384.2 3.4% 3 Arloval loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 29.3 0.3% 9 Decker fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 187.7 1.7% 10 Decker loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 304.5 2.7% 11 Decker loam, saline, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 4.6 0.0% 13 Eoyote fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Moderate 190.9 1.7% 14 Garsox silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 188.0 1.7% 30 Quincy loamy sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes Low 86.6 0.8% 34 Schodson loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes Low 7.3 0.1% 42 Tindahay sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Low 29.7 0.3% 47 Wodskow sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes High 180.6 1.6% 50 Woozle loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Moderate 65.4 0.6% 51 Water 322.4 2.8% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 2,030.9 17.9% Totals for Area of Interest 11,350.9 100.0% Corrosion of Steel—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 4 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Description "Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle-size distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The steel in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the steel in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low," "moderate," or "high." Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be rendered. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding percent composition is recorded. A percent composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values for the components in a map unit. For each group, percent composition is set to the sum of the percent composition of all components participating in that group. These groups now represent "conditions" rather than components. The attribute value associated with the group with the highest cumulative percent composition is returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative percent composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher group value should be returned in the case of a percent composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant condition throughout the map unit only when no tie has occurred. Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Components whose percent composition is below the cutoff value will not be considered. If no cutoff value is specified, all components in the database will be considered. The data for some contrasting soils of minor extent may not be in the database, and therefore are not considered. Corrosion of Steel—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 5 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Tie-break Rule: Higher The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a percent composition tie. Corrosion of Steel—Cassia County, Idaho, West Part; and Minidoka Area, Idaho, Parts of Minidoka, Blaine, and Lincoln Counties Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/24/2023 Page 6 of 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX B.2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife IPaC Resource List Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX B.3 National Register of Historic Places in Idaho Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     2+!#314!54$! 2+!524!54$! 2+!#314!54$!6/0!72+!524! 54$!869:6 ;   @ ! A2+4!#314!54$!869:6 BCD E  E  F()G21,,(221!6/0!H)991,! #GI+J21I2)G1!F'  7@7 @7 2+!#314!54$!869:6 KCBC N5!O(P2!QRRJI1P!J/!S06+(! 7 T 7 ! UO5 7  7@ @  A !V4!W1X1-$!869:6 Y ZD  M[  7  (/!5/6\1!'J31G$!8]!(R!O6G96$! O6G96!3JIJ/J2-  E   !84! 2+$!O6G96 D F()G21,,(221!6/0!H)991,! #GI+J21I2)G1!F' 7 7 7 @ G0!6/0!d621P$!O6G96    HX-! @!6/0!521:+6/!h6/1$!'(PX1,,  e F()G21,,(221!6/0!H)991,! #GI+J21I2)G1!F' Yg?f 77 7  '24!$!#G1/6!j6,,1-!'04$!]J,01G  777 77   !d622!%(G/1G!'04$!]J,01G! 3JIJ/J2-   N454!HJ*+X6-!7A$!8!(R!]J,01G$! ]J,01G!3JIJ/J2- fBf ^fg?  7@ @ 7 F(X/!(R!%+1P21GRJ1,0$!%+1P21GRJ1,0 i 77 7 6::G(m4! 4A!9J4!88]!(R!nI24!5H! ! 6/0!F)G/1G!'04$!oG6I1!3JIJ/J2-   O1*G69!FG)PP!'6J,G(60!dGJ0*1P!(R! S06+(!UO5 iB 7@ @ A7!54!U6J/$!5(06!5:GJ/*P  %()/2-!%()G2+()P1P!J/!S06+(!UO5 A  77 7 !54!U6J/!524$!5(06!5:GJ/*P f 7 7 7 @  !.,\4!V!H((:1G!#314$!5(06! 5:GJ/*P ZY   7 A A  8V!(R!5(06!5:GJ/*P!J/!%6GJ.()! 862J(/6,!p(G1P2$!5!(R!SW! $!5(06! 5:GJ/*P!3JIJ/J2- g 77 7 @  !]4!/0!54!524$!5(06!5:GJ/*P   A  77 7 7!54!U6J/!524$!5(06!5:GJ/*P 7  7@ @  [ 7@ @ QRR!SW! [ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       # 234&&* $10567# 89 <  ;@AB  CD CCE F 0,F G  0,F . HI14 L,3,-,IM  PQ @RS   E I4 2IF T ULK/*1-J "LKF# V6/*KM ? $&6-IM $&6/I4&67K7 (J14& WX2    "55/&YF F 0,F . HI14Z(J14& V&/JK/# 2G V6/*KM# V6/*KM L,3,-,IM B;\@RS    W1,- 2IF 1-J "LKF# U1]*KM BO  P@QR^BAR  D E "JJ/K77 _K7I/,3IKJ# V*6K )&0K L,3,-,IM P ^QPB8  D _KM-&*J7 2IF 1-J U*J `aMF  # A  R D     e f,*g&/K L,3,-,IM 8RR   HF2F  1I `6-I*KM 25K-3K/ h;R BQS B BiB   D )KaKM# W1,-# 1-J CI4 2I7F# B   E C   EE W,34,g1- "LKF# Qb8b  H2 X&7I U'',3K7 (J14& D WX2 R   "JJ/K77 _K7I/,3IKJ# X,K/3K L,3,-,IM A   # X,K/3K  hRR    D D  7I 2IF e# GK,55K P 9 CC CCE 2 GK,55K # GK,55K L,3,-,IM h   Q8R BQS E   C CC 2 $41**,7 HF2F $41**,7 PN   W1,- "LK-6K# $41**,7 P   P?     E D X*K171-I "LK-6K# $41**,7 P?    W1,- "LK-6K# $41**,7   E W1,- "LK-6K# $41**,7 P?nd  "JJ/K77 _K7I/,3IKJ# $41**,7 L,3,-,IM  ^ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX B.4 Flood Hazard Map Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Flood Hazard M ap Esri, HERE, G arm in, Esri, HERE, G eographics planningboundary23 Flood Control Districts FIRM : Flood Zone 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard PLS Sections 6/5/2023, 2:42:51 PM 0 0.9 1.8 0.45 m i 0 1.5 3 0.75 km 1:72,224 Idaho Departm ent of W ater Resources G eographics I IDW R, FEM A, Silver Jackets I FEM A, IDW R, Custer County, Idaho I FEM A, IDW R, Custer County, Idaho, Silver Jackets I Idaho State Tax Com m ission I Idaho Departm ent of W ater Resources I Esri, HERE I Esri, HERE, G arm in I Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX B.5 Climate Information Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      CD*DBEFBG;HBHC50
,I CD*DBEKBG;HHHC50
,I CD*DBEMBGBEEHC50
,I S  ./01/5
75/ P15+@X^ ^ Z[5/0/?
[+070 Z[5/0/?+@+070  T T S R  *
+,-P700
5-P
I9ii jkOl m nfoe VS )Lqr)q$%LJ \15 s7@ s7, \7X P/1 B2HB H2F< H2KF H2EE H2EK H2FH H2;E H2h< H2hE H2K; H2FK H2EF E2Bi F2< h2F <2i B2F H2M H2H H2H H2H H2H B2B B2E i2F ;K2F ; B H H H H H H H H H B H ?
[2./012EE2Eu?+@2./012BHHu45/+1+
+@BHHuP@Yd
,,EE2EuP@Y*/1AFh2Bu Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---











 

 
   

 




                            



        

 



   
  

             Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 







! 



#



 #  # 


#  


%





  !   ! !  

! !    

!      



!  #

 !  $



 



  





#   



 #

 

6   

 !  Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX B.6 Socioeconomics Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    2)3 2)3 4)567 4)567 9 : ;  " @A9 B CD0EF GHIJKLMI  NO P Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---  
    
                         3(45/+(67)  3(45/+(67) A/6(B) ?(1/2CD) E/1/6  ?(1/2CD) E/1/6 "
      #    
   "    #   $  
   
      I-=C5  > ; J4=6C " J4=6C) KLML) N,26=/2 G" J4=6C) KLOP) KLOL J4=6C) KLQP) KLQL J4=6C) KLRP) KLRL G S+,C) J426/DT C(@U 3(B) 2/-C/25) J426/DT C(@U Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX C Water Rights Documentation Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX D Water Quality Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 1 of 14 Chemical And Radiological Sampling History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 227 A PWS is only required to report the most recent detections of any contaminant at each representative sampling location. For example, if nitrate is detected in a sample collected at Well X in 2022, but is not detected at Well X in 2023, then the system is not required to report nitrate for Well X in the 2023 CCR. Note: If a contaminant nitrate) is listed with a (meaning "Yes") in the "non-detect" column, this means that sampling results showed a "non-detect" - that is to say, nitrate was not detected. Required Language. If a system reports a detection, the system must give the major sources of the contaminant. To report this information, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Major Sources in Drinking Water" column and place it in your CCR. If the system exceeds the MCL (maximum contaminant level) value of a contaminant, the system must show the potential health effects of the contaminant. To report this information, go to Appendix A of the CCR template , find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Health Effects Language" column and place it in your CCR. Abbreviations used below: MG/L (mg/L) = milligrams per liter (mg/L = ppm in Appendix A) UG/L (µg/L) = micrograms per liter (µg/L = ppb in Appendix A) PIC/L (pCi/L) = picocuries per liter Contaminant Date Collected Facility Non Detect? Detected Level Units CCR Units 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 ARSENIC 10/18/2023 WELL #7 N 0.003 MG/L 2.560 ARSENIC 12/21/2020 WELL #7 N 0.003 MG/L 2.760 ARSENIC 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB N 0.003 MG/L 3.000 ARSENIC 09/10/2019 WELL #3 N 0.003 MG/L 3.000 ARSENIC 09/10/2019 WELL #4 N 0.002 MG/L 2.000 ARSENIC 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 0.003 MG/L 3.000 BARIUM 10/18/2023 WELL #7 N 0.064 MG/L 0.064 BARIUM 12/21/2020 WELL #7 N 0.045 MG/L 0.045 BARIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB N 0.290 MG/L 0.290 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 2 of 14 BARIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #3 N 0.250 MG/L 0.250 BARIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #4 N 0.390 MG/L 0.390 BARIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 0.310 MG/L 0.310 BENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 BENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 BENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 BENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 BENZENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 CADMIUM 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 CADMIUM 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 CADMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 CADMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 CADMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 CADMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 CHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 CHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 CHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 CHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 CHLOROBENZENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 CHROMIUM 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 CHROMIUM 12/21/2020 WELL #7 N 0.004 MG/L 3.710 CHROMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 CHROMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 CHROMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 CHROMIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 COMBINED RADIUM (-226 & -228) 11/29/2022 WELL #4 1.520 PCI/L 1.520 COMBINED RADIUM (-226 & -228) 11/29/2022 WELL #7 2.260 PCI/L 2.260 COMBINED RADIUM (-226 & -228) 09/10/2019 WELL #4 0.090 PCI/L 0.090 COMBINED RADIUM (-226 & -228) 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 COMBINED URANIUM 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB N 1.220 UG/L 1.220 COMBINED URANIUM 11/29/2022 WELL #3 N 2.560 UG/L 2.560 COMBINED URANIUM 11/29/2022 WELL #4 N 3.050 UG/L 3.050 COMBINED URANIUM 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 2.530 UG/L 2.530 COMBINED URANIUM 11/29/2022 WELL #7 N 1.380 UG/L 1.380 DICHLOROMETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 DICHLOROMETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 DICHLOROMETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 DICHLOROMETHANE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 DICHLOROMETHANE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 FLUORIDE 10/18/2023 WELL #7 N 0.640 MG/L 0.640 FLUORIDE 12/21/2020 WELL #7 N 0.570 MG/L 0.570 FLUORIDE 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB N 0.590 MG/L 0.590 FLUORIDE 09/10/2019 WELL #3 N 0.450 MG/L 0.450 FLUORIDE 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 FLUORIDE 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 0.430 MG/L 0.430 GROSS ALPHA, EXCL. RADON & U 11/29/2022 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 GROSS ALPHA, INCL. RADON & U 11/29/2022 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 GROSS ALPHA, INCL. RADON & U 09/10/2019 WELL #4 N 4.400 PCI/L 4.400 MERCURY 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 MERCURY 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 MERCURY 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 MERCURY 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 MERCURY 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 MERCURY 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 NICKEL 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 3 of 14 NICKEL 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NICKEL 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NICKEL 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 NICKEL 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 NICKEL 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 06/04/2024 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 06/04/2024 WELL #3 N 0.760 MG/L 0.760 NITRATE 06/04/2024 WELL #4 N 2.210 MG/L 2.210 NITRATE 06/04/2024 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 0.880 MG/L 0.880 NITRATE 06/04/2024 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 10/18/2023 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 10/18/2023 WELL #3 N 1.660 MG/L 1.660 NITRATE 10/18/2023 WELL #4 N 2.330 MG/L 2.330 NITRATE 10/18/2023 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 1.160 MG/L 1.160 NITRATE 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 N 1.810 MG/L 1.810 NITRATE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 N 2.030 MG/L 2.030 NITRATE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 1.720 MG/L 1.720 NITRATE 11/29/2022 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 09/08/2021 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 09/08/2021 WELL #3 N 1.710 MG/L 1.710 NITRATE 09/08/2021 WELL #4 N 2.410 MG/L 2.410 NITRATE 09/08/2021 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 1.660 MG/L 1.660 NITRATE 09/08/2021 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 12/21/2020 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 12/21/2020 WELL #3 N 1.690 MG/L 1.690 NITRATE 12/21/2020 WELL #4 N 2.230 MG/L 2.230 NITRATE 12/21/2020 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 1.030 MG/L 1.030 NITRATE 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NITRATE 09/10/2019 WELL #3 N 1.150 MG/L 1.150 NITRATE 09/10/2019 WELL #4 N 2.740 MG/L 2.740 NITRATE 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD N 1.300 MG/L 1.300 NITRATE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRITE 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRITE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 NITRITE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRITE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 NITRITE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 NITRITE 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 RADIUM-226 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 RADIUM-226 11/29/2022 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 RADIUM-226 09/10/2019 WELL #4 N 0.090 PCI/L 0.090 RADIUM-226 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 RADIUM-228 11/29/2022 WELL #4 N 1.520 PCI/L 1.520 RADIUM-228 11/29/2022 WELL #7 N 2.260 PCI/L 2.260 RADIUM-228 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 RADIUM-228 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 SELENIUM 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 SELENIUM 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 SELENIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 SELENIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 SELENIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 SELENIUM 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 STYRENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 STYRENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 STYRENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 STYRENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 STYRENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 THALLIUM, TOTAL 10/18/2023 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 4 of 14 THALLIUM, TOTAL 12/21/2020 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 THALLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 THALLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 THALLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 THALLIUM, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 TOLUENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 TOLUENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 TOLUENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 TOLUENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 TOLUENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 VINYL CHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 VINYL CHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 VINYL CHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 VINYL CHLORIDE 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 VINYL CHLORIDE 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 XYLENES, TOTAL 11/29/2022 WELL #2 14 & ALB Y 0.000 0.000 XYLENES, TOTAL 11/29/2022 WELL #3 Y 0.000 0.000 XYLENES, TOTAL 11/29/2022 WELL #4 Y 0.000 0.000 XYLENES, TOTAL 11/29/2022 WELL #5 & WELL #6 MANIFOLD Y 0.000 0.000 XYLENES, TOTAL 09/10/2019 WELL #7 Y 0.000 0.000 Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 5 of 14 Coliform Sampling History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 120 Only report coliform results in the CCR if one or more samples tested positive during the 2023 calendar year. Required Language. If your water system's coliform history for the year included one or more samples present for coliform, you must give the major sources of the contaminant. To report this information, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Major Sources in Drinking Water" column and place it in your CCR. If the system has exceeded the MCL (maximum contaminant level) value for coliforms, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Health Effects Language" column and place it in your CCR. Coliform Sampling History Total Records: 120 Contaminant Date Collected P=Present A=Absent COLIFORM (TCR) 12/20/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/20/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/20/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/20/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/05/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/05/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/05/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/05/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/05/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 12/05/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/14/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/14/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/14/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/14/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 11/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 10/03/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/25/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/25/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/25/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/25/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 09/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/02/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/02/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/02/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/02/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 08/02/2023 A Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 6 of 14 COLIFORM (TCR) 08/02/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 07/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 06/06/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/23/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/23/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/23/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/23/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/09/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/09/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/09/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/09/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/09/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 05/09/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/18/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/11/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/11/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/11/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/11/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/11/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 04/11/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/21/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 03/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/22/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 02/07/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/24/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/24/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/24/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/24/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/10/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/10/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/10/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/10/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/10/2023 A COLIFORM (TCR) 01/10/2023 A Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 7 of 14 Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 8 of 14 Lead And Copper Sampling History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 4 A public water system is only required to report the most recent 90% percentile detections for lead and copper within the past five years. If a result is listed as zero, it should be assumed the result was actually a non-detect. Other lead and copper information to be included in the CCR not listed on this page are the number of samples collected from the distribution system, and the highest level of lead or copper that was detected. Required Language. If there are detections for lead and copper to report, the system must give the major sources of the contaminant. If a system reports a detection, the system must give the major sources of the contaminant. To report this information, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Major Sources in Drinking Water" column and place it in your CCR. If the system exceeds the MCL (maximum contaminant level) value of a contaminant, the system must show the potential health effects of the contaminant. To report this information, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Health Effects Language" column and place it in your CCR. Abbreviations used below: MG/L (mg/L) = milligrams per liter (mg/L = ppm in Appendix A) UG/L (µg/L) = micrograms per liter (µg/L = ppb in Appendix A) Contaminant # Samples Collected 90th %ile Result Units Date Collected CCR Units LEAD SUMMARY 31 0.000 MG/L 09/26/2023 0.000 COPPER SUMMARY 31 0.089 MG/L 09/26/2023 0.089 LEAD SUMMARY 30 0.000 MG/L 08/26/2020 0.000 COPPER SUMMARY 30 0.070 MG/L 08/26/2020 0.070 Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 9 of 14 DBP Sampling History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 122 Sampling history is only listed for systems which are practicing chlorination on a full-time basis. Public water systems that are required to collect one sample for disinfection byproducts once every year, or every three years, are only required to report the most recent detections for disinfection byproducts. If the most recent sampling was a non-detect for the contaminants, then it is not necessary to report any disinfection byproduct sampling. Note: If a contaminant is listed with a (meaning "Yes") in the "non-detect" column, this means that sampling results showed a "non-detect" - that is to say, the contaminant was not detected. If a public water system collects more than one sample per year, the system must report the average of Total Trihalomethanes and Haloacetic Acids Group 5 over the 2023 calendar year. The highest level detected, and the range for each contaminant must also be reported. Required Language. If a system reports a detection, the system must give the major sources of the contaminant. To report this information, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Major Sources in Drinking Water" column and place it in your CCR. If the system has exceeded the MCL (maximum contaminant level) value of a contaminant, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Health Effects Language" column and place it in your CCR. Contaminant Date Collected Sampling Location Non Detect? Detected Level Units CCR Units TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/26/2022 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.001 MG/L 1.010 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/26/2022 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/22/2021 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/22/2021 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/08/2021 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/08/2021 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/24/2020 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/24/2020 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/10/2019 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.002 MG/L 1.800 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/10/2019 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/25/2018 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/25/2018 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/22/2017 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.002 MG/L 1.500 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/22/2017 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.001 MG/L 1.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/20/2016 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/20/2016 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.001 MG/L 1.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/28/2015 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/28/2015 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/29/2014 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/29/2014 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 1.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/22/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/24/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/23/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/23/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/23/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 10 of 14 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 1.370 UG/L 1.370 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 07/29/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.003 MG/L 3.140 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 07/29/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.004 MG/L 3.550 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 07/28/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.011 MG/L 10.780 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 07/28/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.002 MG/L 2.390 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 21.190 UG/L 21.190 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 22.490 UG/L 22.490 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 23.180 UG/L 23.180 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 7.640 UG/L 7.640 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/28/2006 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/28/2006 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/28/2006 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.002 MG/L 1.500 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.002 MG/L 2.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 09/26/2022 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.006 MG/L 6.210 TTHM 09/26/2022 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.001 MG/L 0.870 TTHM 09/22/2021 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.002 MG/L 2.000 TTHM 09/22/2021 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.004 MG/L 4.100 TTHM 09/08/2021 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.000 0.000 TTHM 09/08/2021 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.000 0.000 TTHM 09/24/2020 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.001 MG/L 1.300 TTHM 09/24/2020 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.006 MG/L 5.800 TTHM 09/10/2019 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.002 MG/L 2.400 TTHM 09/10/2019 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.007 MG/L 6.700 TTHM 09/25/2018 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.001 MG/L 1.000 TTHM 09/25/2018 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.004 MG/L 3.600 TTHM 08/22/2017 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.001 MG/L 1.200 TTHM 08/22/2017 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.004 MG/L 4.300 TTHM 09/20/2016 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.006 MG/L 5.500 TTHM 09/20/2016 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.002 MG/L 1.800 TTHM 09/28/2015 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON N 0.001 MG/L 1.260 TTHM 09/28/2015 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 09/29/2014 FH 12 N. MINIDOKA AVE. N 0.006 MG/L 6.070 TTHM 09/29/2014 FH 368 2758 WASHINGTON Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.005 MG/L 4.900 TTHM 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 1.100 TTHM 09/24/2013 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 0.800 TTHM 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 1.000 TTHM 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.003 MG/L 2.900 TTHM 08/27/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 1.200 TTHM 08/22/2012 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.002 MG/L 2.400 TTHM 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.000 MG/L 0.100 TTHM 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/29/2011 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 1.100 TTHM 08/24/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/23/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.004 MG/L 4.060 TTHM 08/23/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 0.990 TTHM 08/23/2010 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 7.600 UG/L 7.600 TTHM 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 0.000 TTHM 08/24/2009 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 2.400 UG/L 2.400 TTHM 07/29/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 07/29/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.006 MG/L 6.190 TTHM 07/28/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 07/28/2008 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.870 UG/L 0.870 TTHM 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 12.100 UG/L 12.100 TTHM 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 1.800 UG/L 1.800 TTHM 08/02/2007 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 2.300 UG/L 2.300 TTHM 08/28/2006 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 08/28/2006 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 08/28/2006 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 11 of 14 TTHM 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 08/25/2005 GENERIC SAMPLING POI Y 0.000 MG/L 0.000 TTHM 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 1.300 TTHM 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 1.000 TTHM 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.004 MG/L 4.200 TTHM 11/09/2004 GENERIC SAMPLING POI N 0.001 MG/L 0.800 Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 12 of 14 RTCR Sampling History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 0 Only report if your water system was required to comply with one or more Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) Level 1 and/or Level 2 Assessments during the 2017 calendar year. Required Language: If your water system was required to conduct an RTCR Level 1 or Level 2 Assessment (numbers I- III below), the associated information must be reported in the CCR in accordance with IDAPA 58.01.08.151. I. If your water system was required to conduct a Level 1 or 2 assessment not due to an E. coli MCL violation, go to section I below. II. If your water system was required to conduct a Level 2 assessment due to an E. coli MCL violation, go to section II below. III. If your water system detected E. coli and did not violate the E. coli MCL, go to section III below. I. If your water system was required to conduct a Level 1 or 2 assessment not due to an E.coli MCL violation, you must include in the report adverse health affect information and additional information regarding the number of assessments required, the number of assessments completed, the number of corrective actions required and the number of corrective actions completed. Adverse Health Effects Required Text: Coliforms are bacteria that are naturally present in the environment and are used as an indicator that other, potentially harmful, waterborne pathogens may be present or that a potential pathway exists through which contamination may enter the drinking water distribution system. We found coliforms indicating the need to look for potential problems in water treatment or distribution. When this occurs, we are required to conduct assessment(s) to identify problems and to correct any problems that were found during these assessments. Additional Information Required: a. During the past year we were required to conduct [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 1 ASSESSMENTS] Level 1 assessment(s). [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 1 ASSESSMENTS] Level 1 assessment(s) were completed. In addition, we were required to take [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we completed [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions. b. During the past year [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS] Level 2 assessments were required to be completed for our water system. [INSERT NUMBER OF LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS] Level 2 assessments were completed. In addition, we were required to take [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we completed [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions. c. Any system that has failed to complete all the required assessments or correct all identified sanitary defects, is in violation of the treatment technique requirement and must also include one or both of the following statements, as appropriate: i. During the past year we failed to conduct all of the required assessment(s). ii. During the past year we failed to correct all identified defects that were found during the assessment. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 13 of 14 II. If your water system was required to conduct a Level 2 assessment due to an E.coli MCL violation, you must include in the report adverse health affect information and additional information regarding the number of assessments required, the number of assessments completed, the number of corrective actions required and the number of corrective actions completed. Adverse Health Effects Required Text: E. coli are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human or animal wastes. Human pathogens in these wastes can cause short-term effects, such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches, or other They may pose a greater health risk for infants, young children, the elderly, and people with severely compromised immune systems. We found E. coli bacteria, indicating the need to look for potential problems in water treatment or distribution. When this occurs, we are required to conduct assessment(s) to identify problems and to correct any problems that were found during these assessments. Additional Information Required: a. We were required to complete a Level 2 assessment because we found E. coli in our water system. In addition, we were required to take [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] corrective actions and we completed [INSERT NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS] of these actions. b. Any system that has failed to complete the required assessment or correct all identified sanitary defects, is in violation of the treatment technique requirement and must also include one or both of the following statements, as appropriate: i. We failed to conduct the required assessment. ii. We failed to correct all sanitary defects that were identified during the assessment that we conducted. c. Any system that violated the E. coli MCL, the system must include, in addition to the required adverse health effects text [see II.(A) above], one or more of the following statements to describe any noncompliance, as applicable: i. We had an E. coli-positive repeat sample following a total coliform-positive routine sample. ii. We had a total coliform-positive repeat sample following an E. coli-positive routine sample. iii. We failed to take all required repeat samples following an E. coli-positive routine sample. iv. We failed to test for E. coli when any repeat sample tests positive for total coliform. III. If your water system detected E. coli and did not violate the E. coli MCL, the system may include, in addition to the required adverse health effects text [See II.(A) above], a statement that explains that although E. coli water detected, your system was not in violation of the E. coli MCL. No results were found for the RTCR Sampling History Report. Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sampling History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 14 of 14 Chlorine Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Sampling History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 12 Sampling history is only listed for systems which are practicing chlorination on a full-time basis. Please include in your CCR the highest chlorine residual level detected during the previous calendar year (2023) by your system, as well as the average of all residuals collected during 2023. Required Language. If the system exceeds the chlorine MCL (maximum contaminant level) value, the system must show the potential health effects of the contaminant. To report this information, go to Appendix A of the CCR template, find the contaminant, and copy the information from the "Health Effects Language" column and place it in your CCR. Samples Collected Chlorine Residual Units Begin Date Monitoring Period 10 0.4000 MG/L 01/01/2023 JAN2023 10 0.3000 MG/L 02/01/2023 FEB2023 10 0.3000 MG/L 03/01/2023 MAR2023 10 0.3400 MG/L 04/01/2023 APR2023 10 0.3700 MG/L 05/01/2023 MAY2023 10 0.4000 MG/L 06/01/2023 JUN2023 10 0.5000 MG/L 07/01/2023 JUL2023 10 0.4800 MG/L 08/01/2023 AUG2023 10 0.5000 MG/L 09/01/2023 SEP2023 10 0.5700 MG/L 10/01/2023 OCT2023 10 0.5000 MG/L 11/01/2023 NOV2023 10 0.5200 MG/L 12/01/2023 DEC2023 Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Violation History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 1 of 7 Chemical And Radiological Violation History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 1 Monitoring violations are violations that occurred because a system failed to complete a required contaminant sampling (which means the system failed to "monitor" or sample for a contaminant). MCL (maximum contaminant level) violations are violations that occurred because the level of the completed sampling was higher than allowed, or higher than the MCL (maximum contaminant level). If the chemical monitoring report shows no results, then the system has no chemical violations for the last (2023) calendar year. Contaminant Violation Type Facility Begin Date End Date DBP2 - STAGE 2 MONITORING, ROUTINE (DBP), MAJOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 01/01/2023 12/31/2023 Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Violation History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 2 of 7 Coliform Violation History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 0 Monitoring violations are violations that occurred because a system failed to complete a required contaminant sampling (which means the system failed to "monitor" or sample for a contaminant). MCL (maximum contaminant level) violations are violations that occurred because the level of the completed sampling was higher than allowed, or higher than the MCL (maximum contaminant level). If the coliform monitoring report shows no results, then the system has no coliform violations for the last (2023) calendar year. No results were found for the Coliform Violation History Report. Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Violation History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 3 of 7 Lead And Copper Violation History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 0 If your system has a violation listed below, it means that your system was required to sample for lead and copper during calendar year 2023, but failed to do so during the appropriate time period. These violations must be reported in the CCR as a failure to monitor. If the lead and copper monitoring violations report shows no results (Total Records: then the system has no lead and copper monitoring violations for the last (2023) calendar year. No results were found for the Lead And Copper Violation History Report. Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Violation History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 4 of 7 DBP Violation History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 2 This report only applies to systems practicing chlorination and/or filtration. Monitoring violations are violations that occurred because a system failed to complete a required contaminant sampling (which means the system failed to "monitor" or sample for a contaminant). MCL (maximum contaminant level) violations are violations that occurred because the level of the completed sampling was higher than allowed, or higher than the MCL (maximum contaminant level). If the DBP monitoring violations report shows no results, then the system has no disinfection byproduct violations for the last (2023) calendar year. Contaminant Violation Type Facility Begin Date End Date TTHM MONITORING, ROUTINE (DBP), MAJOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 01/01/2023 12/31/2023 TOTAL HALOACETIC ACIDS (HAA5) MONITORING, ROUTINE (DBP), MAJOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 01/01/2023 12/31/2023 Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Violation History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 5 of 7 SWTR and MRDL Violation History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 0 This report only applies to systems practicing chlorination and/or filtration. Violations listed are either treatment techniques or failure to monitor violations. Violation Type "TT" designates a treatment technique violation; violation type "MON" designates a monitoring violation. If no records are displayed, the system did not accrue any applicable violations during the previous calendar year. For your information - definitions of abbreviations found in the "Requirements" column: EPRD: "entry point residual disinfection" level either not met or not reported. DSRD: "distribution system residual disinfection" level either not met or not reported. 95PT: "95 percentile" (95%) turbidity level either exceeded or not reported. MAXT: "maximum turbidity" level either exceeded or not reported. No results were found for the SWTR and MRDL Violation History Report. Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Violation History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 6 of 7 Sanitary Survey Significant Deficiency Violation History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 0 This report identifies violations generated from unaddressed significant deficiencies and failing to consult with the state to produce a compliance schedule. If the Sanitary Survey Significant Deficiency violations report shows no results, then the system has no significant deficiency violations for the last (2023) calendar year. No results were found for the Sanitary Survey Significant Deficiency Violation History Report. Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Violation History Report Print Date: June 28, 2024 Page 7 of 7 Public Notification Violation History PWS Number: ID5160008 PWS Name: BURLEY WATER DEPT Total Records: 0 This report identifies violations generated from failing to deliver public notification to the public in accordance with the public notification schedule. If the Public Notification violation history report shows no results, then the system has no public notification violations for the last (2023) calendar year. No results were found for the Public Notification Violation History Report. Note: Please notify your regional DEQ office if you find discrepancies in your sampling or violation histories. DEQ will correct the errors in the agency's database. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    ,-./01234./5167819 : @/A/0-B1C3D/19 ! ,-./01234./516-5/19EFGHIJKLIG IML 2.-./1C3D/19 ! N0OPQOD-B1R7SP.3 2/0T/A19 N0O5-03127S0Q/ 9 U 2.-.S419 K VQ.OTO.31W-./19 >XY>ZYopY <>Y g >q %rs:LrG:sUt GrFL:sI%KwrG IHHyo>ZY p;X; g oZ %rs:LrG:sUt GrFL:sIu EMvt %:srG x EM x EMY !HrI :LG:EFL:rs JLI% C7.-B16S5I/017}1~/Q70A41@/.Q/A1€1 h)e i  j*d l)b
^ m  ^ m o>oqY qZ=o g p; ‚K:HFGI K GI I‚:!:Is!J uUGv UGrFs KLIG GFHI o>oqY qZ=q g p; ‚K:HFGI K GI I‚:!:Is!J uUGv UGrFs KLIG GFHI o>oqY qZ=p g p; ‚K:HFGI K GI I‚:!:Is!J uUGv UGrFs KLIG GFHI o>XXX !ƒHrG:sI :LG:EFL:rs JLI% o>10% Y X N Coating Satisfactory Fair X N Oxidized Y N X Pitting Y N X Delamination Y N X Corrosion % Y N X Seams/Welds Good Low Spots Y N X Cathodic Protection Plates None Sealed Y N Loose Y N Missing Y N Conclusion/Discrepancies: Roof coating is cracked and peeling with minor surface corrosion noted. Satisfactory Y X N Coating Corrosion % Y N X Proper Design Y X N Locked Y X N Gasket Y N X Hinge Good Hatch Size 2 FT FT Conclusion/Discrepancies No gasket present Access is in good shape minus the gasket Satisfactory Fair X N Coating Corrosion 40% Y X N Proper Design Y X N Screens Y X N Sealed Edges & Seams Y X N Cap/Cover Y X N Conclusion/Discrepancies Vent is clear and unobstructed. Coating is failing with pitting of the steel. Screen could use a smaller gauge EXTERIOR ROOF ACCESS HATCH VENTS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Rings Chime Good 2nd Weld Ring Good 3rd Weld Ring Good 4th Weld Ring Good 5th Weld Ring Good Ring(s) Wall to Roof Seam Good Coating Satisfactory Y X N Oxidized Y X N Pitting Y N X Delamination Y N X Corrosion % Y N X Conclusion/Discrepancies Coating has several nicks and scratches. Little to no corrosion as the underlying primer is still intact Construction Coated Steel Satisfactory Y X N Coating Satisfactory Fair X N Oxidized Y X N X Pitting Y N X Delamination Y N X Corrosion 10% Y X N Welds/Joints Good Supports Good Safety Cage/Climb Y X N Conclusion/Discrepancies Ladder and cage and Coating Satisfactory Y X N Oxidized Y X N Pitting Y N X Delamination Y N X Corrosion 15% Y X N Welds/Joints Good Supports None Screens Y X N Attachments pipe extension Foundation Conclusion/Discrepancies Corrosion noted on the exterior pipe EXTERIOR SHELL EXTERIOR LADDER all components are in good condition, surface corrosion present on the rungs and welds OVERFLOW STRUCTURE Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Concrete Slab/Ring Satisfactory Y X N Cracking Y N X Spalling Y N X Exposed Aggregate Y N X Erosion Undermining Y N X Seismic Restraints None Corrosion Y N Tight Y N Conclusion/Discrepancies Concrete is in good condition. No other entry other than roof access Coating Satisfactory Y X N Oxidized Y N X Pitting Y N X Delamination Y N X Corrosion % Y N X Welds/Joints Good Conclusion/Discrepancies Access is in good condition; however no gasket present FOUNDATION MANWAY ENTRIES Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Coating Satisfactory Y N X Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Corrosion 50% Y X N Seams/Welds Fair Trusses None Gussets None Coating Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Corrosion % Y N X Vent Penetration Surface corrosion Roof Hatch Good Conclusion/Discrepancies: Coating is at the end of its service life. Surface corrosion covers the interior of the plates. Surface corrosion has increased by 10% Coating Satisfactory Y N X Blistering Y X N Cracking Y X N Peeling Y X N Holidays Y X N Pitting Y X N Corrosion % Y X N Seams/Welds Poor Rings Chime Poor 2nd Weld Ring Poor 3rd Weld Ring Poor Conditions are progressing with new 4th Weld Ring Poor areas of corrosion and pitting. 5th Weld Ring Fair Ring(s) 7 in all Fair Wall to Roof Seam Fair Baffle/Support Walls None Conclusion/Discrepancies: Coating has failed, the shell needs to be sandblasted and recoated Shell exhibits blistering, cracking, peeling, holidays and slight pitting from the corrosion INTERIOR ROOF INTERIOR SHELL Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Coating None Satisfactory Y N Blistering Y N Cracking Y N Peeling Y N Holidays Y N Pitting Y N Corrosion % Y N Seams/Welds Floor/Base Plates Construction Conclusion/Discrepancies: There are no support columns Coating Satisfactory Fair X N Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Pitting Y N X Corrosion 20% Y X N Seams/Welds Fair Conclusion/Discrepancies: Observable conditions exhibited slight surface corrosion along the seams and a few rust nodules indicating pitting Sediment Depth 3 inches Coating None Satisfactory Y N Blistering Y N Cracking Y N Peeling Y N Holidays Y N Pitting Y N Corrosion Y N Seams/Welds Conclusion/Discrepancies: No other entry than roof access SUPPORT COLUMNS FLOOR MANWAY ENTRIES Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction Coated steel Satisfactory Fair X N Coating Satisfactory Y N X Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Pitting Y N X Corrosion 10% Y X N Seams/Welds Fair Safety Cage/Climb Y N X Conclusion/Discrepancies: Bottom rung that rests in the floor guides is completely corroded away and no longer exists. The bottom rung needs to be replaced and welded in the guides Coating Satisfactory Fair X N Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Pitting Y N X Corrosion 5% Y X N Seams/Welds Fair Conclusion/Discrepancies: Overflow pipe has minor surface corrosion on the pipe and on the interior no changes since last inspection OVERFLOW LADDER Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Influent Coating Satisfactory Y X N Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Pitting Y N X Corrosion % Y N X Seams/Welds Good Conclusion/Discrepancies: influent is in good condition pipe appears to be in good shape Effluent Coating Satisfactory Fair X N Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Pitting Y N X Corrosion % Y N X Seams/Welds Good Conclusion/Discrepancies: Effluent pipe is in good-fair condition with minor corrosion noted Water Sampler Coating Satisfactory Y X N Blistering Y N X Cracking Y N X Peeling Y N X Holidays Y N X Pitting Y N X Corrosion % Y X N Seams/Welds Good Conclusion/Discrepancies: Sampler has minor corrosion on the threads and interior of the pipe APPURTENANCES Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Based on the results of this underwater inspection which took place, it appears this tank needs to be taken out of service sandblasted and recoated in the immediate future. AS the corrosion is pitting the steel; the plates may need to be reinforced to add structural strength before recoating. PDI concurs with the recommendations of AWWA that all potable water reservoirs or storage tanks be cleaned and inspected at least every five years and in some cases, depending upon source waters, type and quantities of sediment, and presence (or lack thereof) of cathodic protection systems, more frequently. The following recommendations are made to provide continued, uninterrupted service of your water storage tank: 1 Your tank should be inspected and cleaned every five years, as suggested by the AWWA. Routine inspections and cleanings provide ample time to perform remedial repairs to abnormalities discovered before having a chance to become problematic. 2 Roof access hatch could use a gasket to create a good seal. 3 Roof vent could use a smaller gauge screen. 4 The interior coating is at the end of its service life and needs to be sandblasted and recoated. The corrosion on the walls is pitting the steel. The bullet hole will eventually need to have a plate welded over the patch. The corrosion is severely pitting the steel plates and will need to be reinforced before recoating. 5 The exterior coating is starting to crack and peel exposing the primer. Corrosion is minimal at this time but eventually the primer will fail. The exterior may need to be recoated at the least touched up around the problematic areas. 6 The interior ladder is missing the bottom rung. The missing rung is what went into the floor guides. This bottom rung needs to be replaced and welded to the ladder legs while it rests in the guides. Attaching the bottom of the ladder will not allow it to raise and lower with the expansion and contraction of the tank. It was designed for the bottom rung to float up and down on the inside of the guides, but two metal surfaces rubbing and touching causes severe corrosion; resulting in the bottom rung completely corroding away. Recommendations Conclusion Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX F Financials Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    " %  2  # # 4
678986786:;7<:=>?@ 89=>: A5B CD6DE8F86:?@ <@G;@@<=6D676DHI@<@ JKL5JKM D@?@AB1CA1D56./0123.E'  F $ G %  I J I K  !   I    I K    I      I         G       I           %    Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         !   0     3   $ 3     3 5676897:;9<8;8=7>9?=7:6@98K6=FK9 9 8?@A:B?     3       3    7    !  G     3       3   " 3             Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---              #     3   4006            8                      3    9               >?@A@)B"CBD"E   9 FG:HGHG:  3  IJK:HLL:LMN 9 O 9  IPGN:JPL- 4  IPNM:KMG4O 9  IHG:HRL 7 9      IJF:PJP:LMGS    9  IJ:LJG:NGG0     U          9  9     V ( W$'X  Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                             (            4 4 56768968:94              Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         (  ! )   !2 '   2"34506760464,8"&!#0.'!#*        (02% * 0     (  $  )  (      !  .  % $  0 !2 '   B  % & #    $   E  FGGHIG ` cbafbgad ` ggbhfbgea gdbgaebefd iXZjXY_k]Y[__XZ gbgfablfa gbgalbhg

ehbhabfc cfbdalbhda cfbaagbc IrIFsFGGHIG lbcegbc labhalbgha ahbaebdld afbdcbde yXY_k]Y]zmk{[Zk]Y_IryH} ccblc lebd gagbhea s~F}~s~I~HG gbafblde gbeflbl ebdbac ebeblhl glbgaebc ahbhl cbf IrIFss~F}~s~I~HG lbhgabha gbcebal Hjm]€XWjXY_k]Y[__VjZk]YIryH} clbdhe cbhfe ldabcg iHIyrG~I~ri iXZkYX_ZXYZkYp[jkZ[m[__XZ_ efbehgbald labbhg



bcabhfl IrIFsiHIyrG~I~ri ` lgbfabha `   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---          % % % % 1 1#3

1 1#3  

14911  



 #  2   1







34#$CB





1@11#4#16





=1470  % % % % DEFGHIHJKLMNFNNO PQONHOORSLMNFNNO TULVDWXVVWYZ[XYX[V \ \ \ c t\q}\lvm\†mspo}us\vƒ}p\plm\zm~}zp\}z\umm{\ ‹zxmq‚\ \‘’’‘‚\}z\wlmw‡\}p\plm\nopq\}t\‹zxmq\€mƒsopm\€€€„ƒzxmqo{vl}„}zI„\\ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---  ( 5+543+1*. 7 '("89 7     # 225+,/, @ 225+,/, 22+22/ 2+/,*+512 @ # /3.+23* @ /3.+23* @ C"'D ?C # # @ @ ( @ 45-+3-5 45-+3-5 @ ) *,2+32, @ *,2+32, @ 24+432+4/5 5+5-.+242 7 7 '("89 D# @ *54+-*4 *54+-*4 @  7 '("89 @ @ @ !@J6J 2+235+,35 @ 2+235+,35 @ @ @ @ -24+**5 D 21+.3*+32/ 22+*53+4,- /+251+,15 C 23+322+1,* *-+531+131 44+,.2+22* 4+224+/51 ; 7 ,1+.32+/,2 *3+521+452 5.+-5/+1,1 .4+2-,+51- GJ66GKLJIKMKJ6KL6 B B9" ,3.+1.1 ,/4+4-1 -25+-41 @ B #@J6J @ @ < DK 7 # ,/4+4-1 @ IENEIEE     !#C"F"89 D"77 D ?C # # -44+**3 2+3**+25- /+421+415 52+,*2 D @ @ D"8# 7 #C"F"89 @ @ ! #!C"F"89 2+35* N; #C"F"89 .15+22, 2+/3*+155 2+3,2+434 # 2+5-3+,1/ *+,*3+344 7 #C"F"89 D# @ @ D#C"F"89 41+111 @ D#C"F"89 ) 2+12/+24, 22+211+111 2/+22/+24, A 9'"8'9'!F @ ; 7 # 24+,1.+.,1 /1+453+-.4 GJ66GEAJIKMKJ6KL6 G < 7 # @ @ @ 5+-,2+,45 )C9;F C B9" 225+,22 @ )C9;F C @J6J @ @ < DE 7 # 5.+*24 214+,.3 5+-,2+,45 ABKEEKA     A ( 6 $ ;O @ @ @ -24+**5 L D ,+33.+/15 22+-/3+23* -4+232+-2- 0  P  C! )8 ) RSQTUQ  F' H " ) - Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   
  /01230244 4046/0787 9 9 1:806/; 1:806/; 80:720847 44608:: 9 9 D403170:47E D403170:47E F?GHI(CJ*K*A.'%%.J /0//102:/ 9 4/40864 9 D7:20:27E D7:20:27E 64:07:4 /:/0314 9 9 D2/70:2:E D2/70:2:E /0//6027/ 3802/6 9 9 D/0:840:;1E D/0:840:;1E 8306;1 /80217 9 9 D460/:;E D460/:;E 2340264 /80264 30;78 9 D21:04:;E D21:04:;E 84;0::; 9 9 467034: D1;0/3;E D1;0/3;E 820;:2 9 9 9 D820;:2E D820;:2E 308;30432 40137028; 44/0/26 467034: D604:;0334E D604:;0334E * * * 30;:20;26 303430/37 9 6208/4 /;;0;61 /;;0;61 402270638 4072704/4 9 3306:: 6330/47 6330/47 20;:;0/31 60/:60;:7 9 7;04:: 2760;48 2760;48 /047707:8 /03:107:3 9 9 6:;0::6 6:;0::6 1310/81 6430;22 9 9 D/6;0874E D/6;0874E /;032;0668 /704/30;14 9 42:0:/4 /01//044/ /01//044/ 410446038; 4/07:30/77 44/0/26 2770384 D604:;0334E /01//044/ D80671011/E /02/;0631 9 9 9 D/02/;0631E 40;7303/3 9 40;7303/3 20:6;071; 82;08;6 9 82;08;6 9 3::017: 9 3::017: 9 /046/07;: 9 /046/07;: 9 4:/0/:4 9 4:/0/:4 9 [PHONE REDACTED]:4 /::0:13 640/46 886013/ 9 886013/ 8:60213 840;;8 9 840;;8 /021:0::: V'(&JB%'J D3;0/:2E 3;0/:2 9 9 60;/603;/ /6401:1 6031302;; 603;6061: 6:;0737 /0;18034; 404;/03/1 2026;07;2 8/0;36076; 240/480722 ;807:707:/ D/106780823E [PHONE REDACTED] 28033;0;;/ ;10/3/0;/; D/40/8608;2E 5* de egd"h ij
 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    )12+34 532. 5+6 5+731893/5+  /-121<8+6 8+6 8+6 8+67 ('BCD'EF& BH%'DHH I JE'FFF DDJ'%(% I I I DDJ'%(% DBB'EJE I I I DBB'EJE  D&B'%FB I I DCB'C(& (CE'DCB  M I I I I I    B%D'CD% I I I B%D'CD% %'(HC'BDE BH%'DHH I (BB'BCF %'EEF'&C(      TU=UTU?U>=VR WVR>XWU?YP TA$AAA"P      BHC'H(& DF'D&E I (JH'%BE HJ('DHC  I I I M I I I I I H&&'HJB DF'D&E I (JH'%BE EHB'(D( R> >KK>RUV  EB'DCB I I I EB'DCB WVR=T=V@>P P I I I I I  I I I I I  I BJH'&FC BJH'&FC  I I I LD('CF%O LD('CF%O ('BC%'BCD I I I ('BC%'BCD      ('BC%'BCD BJH'&FC I LD('CF%O ('E(H'FCF      %'(HC'BDE BH%'DHH I (BB'BCF %'EEF'&C(   E Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       !5  !5          !5  ! )   ?<#'67A   !3  77&#%B7  E ?<#6B7#$$6A E   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   0/0/ 123456784 =3?;9@A;7=3 1=B293C23;:6 12329:6@3> 759:9D@3> E  F  . GHI GIG KIG LGM GI/ N . MKO  IOG N N N IOG G 0HG ML/ N N N G 0HG ML/ 0 I0. LHI L 0/G N N 0 MHL 0/G G/0 N N N 0/G G/0 IH I 0HG N N LG HHH 0G0 .H0 O LM. N 0HM O0/ KO/ MIH T" KI 0KG O N N HK 0IK     L OM0 HIL KMG MOL GI/ 0HM O0/ O MLK H.K E 0.G OKL N N N 0.G OKL 0M MO0 N N N 0M MO0 M0M HML N N 0 M.G HML N N N N GOK 0II N N N GOK 0II 0OI IM/ N N N 0OI IM/ G L.K KKG N N N G L.K KKG G 0HM IHG N N N G 0HM IHG G.M K00 N N N G.M K00 G .OK HHG N N N G .OK HHG GHO GI/ N N N GHO GI/ .LL LIM N N N .LL LIM .I /L0 N N N .I /L0 V#Y .G0 N N N .G0 GH/ N N N GH/ 0LL N N N 0LL N KIO 0OI N N KIO 0OI N N 0LH N 0LH  N N HH GI/ N HH GI/ GH HLH N N .GG K.0 .0L     L H.0 KIO 0OI GI/ K.0 O IKK 00G 00K 0. L/G N IG0]  ] N G. N N G. G/K] N N N G/K] N N N N N N N N N N  ] G/K] G. N N \OL G/K] 0I/ G0/ .I L/G N IG0] 0K. 0/M 0 00. .IG K0/ .IL N K/ LKM 0 IOK KLL 0 KO. KOG KHL /IO N \G0 OI.] 0 M0L IOI ` GG Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   .&/0!1010 15/!106   3  A>>?!105B A15=!11CB     9 AG!G=>B    16=!000    A/!00/B   3   G?C!G?C   9 AG0=!01>B =0>!6C6 9 G1 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   2121 34564789:6;< 56@674= 674= 4BC54D=9 E7F4BC54D=9G H    I  0 JKL M11 0 JKL M11 0 JKO JOJ P2 Q0MR  JOK L11 JOK L11 00K OLJ JOM LLJ J 1Q2 111 J 1Q2 111 J 2KJ MQ1 JQM MQ1 2 LJJ OUK 2 LJJ OUK 2 O20 QKO PJLQ LLMR 2Q0 KU1 2Q0 KU1 21J J12 PQ2 U0LR M2 111 M2 111 OK 01U P2O OMOR 2JO 1JO 2JO 1JO 2J2 0K2 P0 OOUR X" 2M 1UK 2M 1UK UO 2UJ JQ JMO    Q LJL MUO Q LJL MUO Q LM2 KOQ Q0 O2J    H  0KK QJM 0KK QJM 20J LUQ J20 LQ2 0K UKU 0K UKU 2M ML2 K UQ2 J 1L1 QOU J 1L1 QOU M2M KMQ JKJ JOQ + + + + JM0 1O2 JM0 1O2 JLU 2OO L QMO 01O 0OU 01O 0OU 2LO OM1 JM OQU J Q0U UUJ J Q0U UUJ J Q0U UUJ + J 2QJ 0OM J 2QJ 0OM J 2KM OKJ JJ QJL JKL MJQ JKL MJQ J0M U22 JM UMK J KLJ 22M J KLJ 22M J 0LU KKJ JMO OQL JQK 2M2 JQK 2M2 JKL JO1 JQ J02 0QU JM2 0QU JM2 0QQ QOM P0 KQQR 0O MK1 0O MK1 0O 1Q2 LQL 2MQ 2UJ 2MQ 2UJ 00O 0J2 P0M 1QJR JKQ UOO JKQ UOO JK1 Q11 O QOO 01O QJK 01O QJK 2QQ 01L 2M U1Q 22 111 22 111 JK KQK O U2K L 1LQ JQK L 1LQ JQK Q K02 0U0 KKU L02  P2OL 22MR P2OL 22MR 0O1 22U O2L UK0  R + + + + PJKK QKKR PJKK QKKR PJ11 J1UR KK OKJ JLK 111 JLK 111 + PJLK 111R + + + +  R P20L MLUR P20L MLUR 2O1 J21 UMM J1U 2 220 0OJ 2 220 0OJ 2 220 0OJ + J MLU 0QQ J MLU 0QQ 2 UL0 ULJ UMM J1U _ J0 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3232 4567589:;7<= 67A785> 785> 5CD65E>: F8G5CD65E>:H I    J  KLM 21N KLM 21N KLN MNP QR 1N3S  + + + + + + + + M 322 M 322 M 32N N + + + + L 322 L 322 L 3RN RN 1N 122 1N 122 X MP1 Q33 R2MS Y" NN K22 NN K22 X 231 Q1 1MMS    R31 N1N R31 N1N KPN PXM Q1N NKKS    I  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + RKN N1N RKN N1N KLX 3XL M3 XKR RKN N1N RKN N1N KLX 3XL M3 XKR  QNX 222S QNX 222S 31 M2N KN M2N  S NX 222 NX 222 N1 222 R 222 + + + + + + + + + + + +  S + + 1L M2N 1L M2N K32 1LM K32 1LM K32 1LM + K32 1LM K32 1LM KRM 2LX 1L M2N _ NK Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3232 4567589:;7<= 67A785> 785> 5CD65E>: F8G5CD65E>:H I    J  11K LM2 11K LM2 112 KO2 PK MQ2R  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + U" + + + +    11K LM2 11K LM2 112 KO2 PK MQ2R    I  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + V#X + + + + + + + + + + + + 3LM 222 3LM 222 3LM 222 +  MO LM2 MO LM2 MM KO2 K MQ2 11K LM2 11K LM2 112 KO2 K MQ2  + + + +  R + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +  R + + + + + + + + + + + + ] KM Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3232 4567589:;7<= 67A785> 785> 5CD65E>: F8G5CD65E>:H I    J  + + + +  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 PQP Q22 3 PQP Q22 3QP R32 S3 TPP TR2U V" + + + +    3 PQP Q22 3 PQP Q22 3QP R32 S3 TPP TR2U    I  + + + + + + + + WRX 222 WRX 222 3 222 WRQ 222 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 WX3 Q22 3 WX3 Q22 W13 3 2TR 3 PQP Q22 3 PQP Q22 1^1 W13 3 TWT 2TR  + + SQ1 T^3U SQ1 T^3U  U + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +  U + + SQ1 T^3U SQ1 T^3U W2 XWP W2 XWP W2 XWP + W2 XWP W2 XWP S^3 RT1U SQ1 T^3U ` ^T Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         ) -./-0.123 4 -.516.768 4 3.85/.10- 4 803.830 4 82.7-0 4 2.732.//7 4 5.703.36/ 4 0/8.08- 518.8/7 770.-58 5/8.531 5.217 5.-73.8/5 B C!"D%*E B B B B B B 62.023 30/.203 520.255 B B B 086.168 B : 7./27.85/ -.802.612 3.136./66 002.023 05.7/2 55.-35.762 5.333.503 B ? 5/2.320 B 736.-8/ B B 380.630 B B B B B B B B J%#E 56/.-78 -3-.553 31.260 B 367.1-8 B E"D! 7.023.621 2./38.387 77.88-.7// 260./67 755.380 36.81/./1/ B 7.263.8-2 2.-16.806 77.231.8-0 211.867 755.380 31.85/.085 B 6./01./72 55.186.780 71.628.0/7 5.081.-06 76-.608 82.68-./7/ 5.333.503 LM9L KNMJKO KM 9KN9 22.0-/ 05.680 10.-/1 88./32 -3./76 7-0.06/ 22.0-/ 05.680 10.-/1 88./32 -3./76 7-0.06/ JGQGJGG ) "E "FD 5./6/./50 510.-25 370.888 2-.066 81.051 5.133.586 53.-6/ " B B B B B B B B 5.181 52.370 B B -5.-23 B L " ? B B B B B B B Q>#E& ) B : B B -/.557 2/8.557 B : 5./6/./50 -27.532 5.-78.225 2-.066 61.675 -.66/.803 53.-6/ , B 23./27 112.530 B B 217.-72 B Q>#E& ) B B B B 727.33/ -37.120 73/.306 -56.3/2 23.27- 5.-2/.533 727.33/ 5.70-.212 55.7/3.057 -56.3/2 23.27- 57.767.717 B LM9L GIMJKO KM 9KN9 53.7-1 1.11- 5-.726 6.256 7.381 30.21- 53.7-1 1.11- 5-.726 6.256 7.381 30.21- CKGGKI 7.108./77 1.586.806 --.630.-60 211.867 -25.737 70./31.62- B B B B B B B B 5.1-3.13- -./20.8-8 7.81-.873 3/0.63/ =65.00-A 6.171.262 5.3-2.123 8.012.168 4 5/.-83./2- 4 -0.7-1.15/ 4 5.728.757 4 -52.015 4 37.116.665 4 5.3-2.123 4 T  US     V WXTYZ[W\] ^X M 56 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---               $ # ! & 35.--4.465 31.-02.40- 37/-.655 3/./04.752 ! & :7.701.407; ! & >.>/0.111 ) # & 2.16> $ & 7.107.604 @ , ! C & 2>6.512 @ &56.111 ! C " 154.161 IC "J &9+C , 99!L " "9 17>.1>0 & + !9 " & 1/.45/ & 2.6/7 >.047 "9 1>.472 CN $ 2-./57 ! , 66.67/ " C " >0.200 " "9 @ 750.574 ) % 9) & & >2.506 " @ 147 LL N & /.151 $ , " "ED%"L >56.>67 9! @ >11.666 170.07/ & 405.422 # & /6.700 @ & >.14-.22/ 1/6.2// 706.007 1.6-0.526 $ @ " $ < ! 75.>1/ , L & < & 10./07 & @ ; :5.16-; $ @ ; 20.>>4 & 1-6.421 < < 1-6.421 7.701.415 4.27-.142 7.2-4.-67 310./75.04/ 31.>47.>1> 3/14.2-1 31.5/4.-45    c] D+ ) V W"L LA CN O + ! dD%"L& A C " $ A 99+C ) C " &E 1- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---               / 343564738 9746:74;<6 9<43<:473: 9<64768473= 9747>64:;= @=47=<45;3A @7487=48>6A @:=74;:5A 2 @6874;==A A @8;5485:A 55:4785 74>6=4667 / B , B B / B :;48<7 @;4<53A , B @7546=>A @6;645=8A 2 774<5; @74<>>4573A / , ! , B @7843;:A 5584:== <47:84873 <47;543=; 74>7=436; 974<35485: 9;4:<>43=7 9648;64>>8         ! A <754=77 95:74585 9<453>4;=5 8<<4555 7478747:8 ) ( 73;4678 8;4877 * ) ( @5:4<83A ( 5;46:6 55:4785 974>6=4667 96543=> Z c]    + f <6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   122)3.4- 140+ 7*18,94: )35 )35 )35: (%%'CDD F(&'DGCH (G('IJC L L L L L L (%%'CDD F(&'DGCH (G('IJC OA;PAOA=A<     L G%'QJQ G%'QJQ  L L L L L L R L L L R L L L L G%'QJQ G%'QJQ <=!MA=AM    (%%'CDD F%C'%DZH GZZ'&ZZ (%%'CDD F%C'%DZH GZZ'&ZZ  Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   !  !   ./012 34/5/2 677.8392 6950 .30:38; 3:.>35/2 @AABCBD$E G,G-H G,I-H KL  M O  -,H+N G,G-H A'AQCBD$E     O S-,HT+ S-,HT+ O O O  O O O  O S-,HT+ S-,HT+ DCW'X B$@$B$YDQX'KQ'ME   O O O  O O O W@$Y'B$$'C%DBCBD$E -,H+N KSG,IPHM KPN,THSM  *S,+SP -PN,+HP  -**,INN K*I,*NTM GTT,+TT  Z -G Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    (  2- 34  8-      7A3,          9                9    F      7 1      9   477    J9                K7  47 :9  7       11        J9  47 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                  01     0  01         1      0            ,      :3 0 =       '     C     18             Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         & 1,   $5  & 2       &         A       A &  & + & &  &      &   A  &     A &     & & & Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      343#""$ :;<=>?;@AB>CD>EFGBHIJBFIH KBGB@>LM>>N.(  PQ KBGB@>RM>>S  KBGB@>UM>>V , $7 EFGBHIJBFIHXY.(      ^         g=Beh:INLK#LNN      (   (    Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     (234526789:2;4:;< CD  8E<F3E<823G5HI5HJ: KALMA M M O#$RS#R!P M M O#$RS#R!P T @!#$O"#SRO M M @!#$O"#SRO M M UV+ W!"#>SR M P$#R@O#SRW W!"#>SR M P!#@P>#SP@     GGJ4JH5<:Y :Z2:G35<38;' !#RWR#WW@ M !#OPS#P!@ T P#O$S#!"R !"O#WPO M W#@!W#OWP @WP#>S! M UV+ M @$#WSS#R>@ SSR#$"P M %:<88[I5HJ:' KALMA M M L@>"#OO"N M T O#PW!#PR$ L!"O#WPON M O#@PP#>@P P#R!O#>>O L@WP#>S!N M P#POP#"$W UV+ M L$PW#$$ON M $>#S>W#OPR 8E<F3E<823G5HI5HJ: KALMA M M M M T M M UV+ @#ROP#"@S M M @@#SWP#"W@     GGJ4JH5<:Y :Z2:G35<38;' W#!R! M $WS#SW$ T $PP#O>S M UV+ R@#W@S M S#WSS#$P@ !@@#SSS M S#OO>#"@O %:<88[I5HJ:' KALMA M M LW#!R!N M T M !#WW>#RSS L$PP#O>SN M UV+ L!!#WWSN M $OW#R!> P#@PO#OW" L$O!#O@SN M  $O  Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    ./012/0.3245675689 < < ABC#&BD < ABC#&BD E (D#D"(#BB> BB#D"" < HI- &BC#>$A BC#D&A < (CA#"&A < (C#D&D#D"D     448K86509L 9M3942502.NO < D"C#$$B E A#C$$#BA( >(D#BBD < C#(!B#C>A HI- < AA(#&A> >BB#B>> < P90..Q75689O < < < (B"#CDC E < B#>D(#A!B HI- !B>#D&C < < &#$BC#DAC ./012/0.3245675689 >B#&CA < < >B#&CA B""#DC( < E >A#((A#DAA < >A#$(!#CAD HI- < < D"#$&&#CAD     448K86509L 9M3942502.NO DCD#(AB < E < HI- < < (A#A&B#>B& P90..Q75689O >B#&CA < < >B#&CA CDA#>!$ < (#CC(#AB" E < HI- < !!#B!C#CA$ < Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    -./01./-2134564578 ; ; ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, ; ;     337I754/8J 8K28314/1-LM ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, ; ; O8/--P64578M ; ; ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, ; &NF#"N! ; &EE#=N! -./01./-2134564578 ; ; ; ; GE!#==F ; ; GE!#==F @ ; CD, (#"(G#FNN ; ; (#"(G#FNN ; ;     337I754/8J 8K28314/1-LM $FE#E(" @ E!G F"F#FG= CD, (#N""#GEE ; O8/--P64578M ; ; ; ; ; $(G#NGF @ :E!G< ; CD, (NN#!=F ; G"F#NEN ; Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       0"1#230 5+ 27#7!8  $88#1"3 5 5+ 8#!!3   $#2"0  6 $#@33  778#$"0   P P P P R P P P P P P P P ST+ P P P P P 1#02"#!"2 P 1#02"#!"2     IIMUMKJENV NWHNIGJEGCXY P @1!#72" P @1!#72" R P P P P P P P P ST+ P P P P P @1!#72" P @1!#72" P P P P R P P P P P P P P ST+ P P P P P 1#$88#222 P 1#$88#222 N^NKCWUNXEME_CHGE\             Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    (  00    56789:9;<=<>6<9?@7A9:9;6978>?9C75:7D9D896?E7F9>6?75;7?96G<=9H7>I9H7>:C7JG96>I97?>K>6F@7L9D896?7              Y3   1            2 1Q  7]7^J97_?97aK>:7>:C7BJ97b<69;:?7 2*3    3  011 31      3 3   Y3 13 *gV   XM MMMQ  Q1/Q40Q 2 bcb7=5?B75;7K?97?9C75:7BJ97<:=69>?97<:7BJ97?B>B9nG96>I97;<69;I9@ R       2 1     2 2 Y3 3     *   3  3 Q  00     A9:9;6978>?9C75:7D9D896?E7F9>6?75;7?96G<=97>?7n9KK7>?7BJ97;<:>K7>G96>I97?>K>6F@7t7;<69;G97u7      iUQ     1kQkiS,    2 c9B<69D9:B7A5>6C7>:C7n>?7xx@yz{7I9:96>K79DfK5F99?7>:C7xI@I}{7;567f5K<=97>:C7;<69;?;@A;;=<@ABBCDAK?;@MCN>AB@KCBED:@MCN@A;;=<@ABBCDAAB@A;;=<@ABBCDA=OIA<@>CN=@DCF;=NQA?;@ R5      1      6 2041       1   Docusign Envelope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ocusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      3 6!7#7!8 6<8#6:< 8#7:7   3 8;6#8;/ /#!;6#887 8;6#87< 6!!#<78   *       * *            Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     * $-0#-42 $$2#03" 3/2#"$0 -#4/3#.44 0#/00#3// 67  A 5 A 5 5 A 5 B4"0#2.$C A 5 A 5 4#/$2#404 B.4#2$!C 4#/$2#404 B-#4.3#.4$C $3#232#0!" EF
GHIDJ I DK
DG J M N 7 QF G RF S S GU   L D 2$  9 6   7 7 7  7         7  8 7  *        8      Y  )   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    * 112 4   4 5 24 62 =   321 =  B D B       3F  ) ) 2   2 G2 3OGH5P2 2 13F5J E11  .22 0  2 2  2 1 .21   3  .21      KL2 12 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---

Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   " ! #  " $ !   # % % "    %   $ $ !   "  !   # # !  #           # ! " # !  ! !    $        2 34567869:9;<;=98>?@8AB8C;DEFC;G89;=8H;:CG8?I8F=I?C<:9F?=89?8J;8KC;G;=9;L8F=89MFG89:JN; M?O;P;CQ8E=9FN8:8IENN8RSTH;:C89C;=L8FG8U? > > <58?6 4567;56?4 4685;87 > 457985 > 457;85<<6 4=95644 75?945<6I 9=65<;9 7958I4 > > > > > > 9=65<;9 7958I4 > > > 9=65<;9 7958I4 6=759=< 7985I=7 457?85I46 :7695I<< :459785I89  Y 96 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     9A;:=@B A;G F<:999:=C=G H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ I1#.*$*.4.,)1"JF)!07.21"G H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ BDC:<>B FDB:<;BG B:AA9 $ B>:BB; $ FAD>:CBCG $ $%,2!24,23$!41,+,1,."5 H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ $%,2!24,23$!41,+,1,."5 H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ BDC:<>B FDB:<;BG B:AA9 $ B>:BB; $ FAD>:CBCG $ ;D<:BDA A:D@B 9>D:BC@ FAD>:CBCG 9:A=B:B;>        BD;:A=B G 9=C:9=C H $ H $ H $ H H $ H $ H $ H $ H $ H H $ H $ H $ $ H $ H H $ $ CB> $ BA@ $ H $ ;:DAD $ @:AC= $ BDC:<>B FDB:<;BG B:AA9 B>:BB; FAD>:CBCG   [ '7/,2,23$a1!1.7.21$'%$ P21.*2!&$a.*+,4.$b82-" a..$!44'7)!20,23$2'1."$1'$1#.$%,2!24,!&$"1!1.7.21"e BC Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---        BC  F µ¶Ä½³º²®»°´²®Å´·¯Æ°±´Ç²¯¯°±È´ ÊË Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---            J LM N OP"PQPO RS Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    " %  2  # # 4
678986786:;7<:=>?@ 89=>: A5B CD6DE8F86:?@ <@G;@@<=6D676DHI@<@ J5JKL D@?@A= 38569:5;8< 38<57>6 ?@A@BCDEFGAHEI@J@AG@KELMEFGANOPQA d`WVSeTfVS`cV`W[g lVVaYbYl^`Va o^a_Vgg[`VTpa Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       # " 0-)1 23 !43 23 53 3 3 !3 623 73 !83 53 E(F%G+-+H% 'I./*HN(GO) ,*.G-GL P/%H&G*H N-&%G Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   " &23( 5&   " ' 5  87?9;@&5 &23(  " 2!2   9  " (  !  ! ! ( "  ( " ( > ( A" 5  # 55 ! ! DE  F(    " &5G3  5&    " ' 9F(   &23( &+-/781/;045& .7.79H3 ( +./408/;18 &23( 5&  6.7.8 5&  5 '  "  (3 A3 A" 5  # 55 ! ! DE JE    G3 &23(  6.7.89 " "    & !3A  2(I& !3A   87098@&5<( !  ( 5 A" 5 55 ! ! LMN  " &23( ' (  &23( &5+817/7779& (  &23(  6.7.89H3 ( &23(  ( "  ( & ( C!   5 &2:HPKQ9 REEM ( " &"&5+?81/088 &23( &23(  ( ( ( S ! !  ! ( " (23("  32"  2 " &55'  !  A" 5 55 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---        2  $  6789/::9()*  $ $   2  2F  2GEF3H        3 2F   #   $ 5   25  NOP PCQ?QR ?S=P 3 2*#6VU/79:/WWW   69V7U/:VW()*   - Z__e\f^^\b`d Z_\e`f\^fg\b`ed Zg\g]e\aaa\b`^d Z^\faf\ccf\b_`d Zgff\fc`\bcd Z`\[g`\c^g\b]d Zac]\g]f\bcd stutvwxyzu{ stutvwxI}x~w€~u‚u{ ƒw€tvyzu{ ƒw„€t w€tvyzu{ †xt‡€v~‡yzu{ ˆ~}vwv‰yzu{ Šwu~€w€~uyzu{ sx‹yzu{ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                        *   4      56789:7;<=7>>M>>>NJJIJJIOPGQRI Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     (  ! )  !2 '   2"34506670867,9"&!#0.'!#*        (02% * 0      (  $  ) (      !   .  % $  0  !2 '   B  % & #    $   E ACCF>C GHIJKLMKMM GHIJKLMKMN GHIJKLMKMM GHIJKLMKMN 3 40O6;048P ;0Q4R074; 3 O;05670O57 OQ0O8407;5 O0;8608OR P0OQO0P58 S  S  < 8708QQ0P4O 8O0588055R 6Q04670857 650P7O0RQ6 >T>AUACCF>C 670O8;068P 6706560O84 ;P0Q470Q67 ;P086707PO  2' [TDF9 P0O;;056P 5660458 O0O570RP7 ;P;06;6 U-A9-U->-FC !2 '   O0P5;0O58 O0P;R087R P0OR40O55 P0O460P75 !2 '   ;O607PR O07R;0Q74 R055606O; O70ROP076R !2 ' P0Q8;0544 :QO0QPP< P0O4O07P6 :680554< >T>AUU-A9-U->-FC 606P;0RR7 P08O60PRQ O60OQ80;O5 O807QP0654 % [TDF9 O60Q75 P0OO50RPP OR0O45 O06OO05Q5 F>DTC->-T   PR0QO;0Q4Q P40PRQ065Q 8;04OQ0857 8;0RP4044Q S  S  S  S  4086Q07RP ;086707QR OP05;80PR8 O70O470PR5 >T>AUF>DTC->-T 3 8504;O0;55 860;8Q0Q86 3 6R0Q540;;8 650O7R0O4P \]G^_`G_IabcId]dIdGe fged_Gee IhHGcId]dIdGe      Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---            %  1,2,3%45676*3'" BCDCEFCG  H I*JK9*L9I H I*LLM*LJL H I6*LI7*9LJ H I6*I6J*K5I %  M6*69L 5I*I66 N  N  %  MLJ*5MK 5*7K:*IK: 5*:J7*LI9 :KL*:LJ :*5LM*5J6 :*IJ6*J9M N  N   PG I*J5I*5L5 I*KL5*996 N  N  IL9*69K I6:*MKI N  N  "  LM7*97I MMK*9:6 :M*IK5 I:*J6L  ' RJ9*K:6S R5MM*697S J9*K:6 5MM*697 7*795*L75 56*7LJ*79L II*5II*IJL I6*J:5*LJM CT1CEGCG  79M*:LI :*56:*796 N  N   G :*669*9LK I*976*76M N  N  MJK*99J 7:5*:MK N  N  K59*9K5 K6K*L56 N  N   5*JLJ*KJ6 5*57M*KL7 N  N   N  N  9*75K*J9M 9*M:5*5L9 N  N  :*66J*J6J I*:L5*6JM N  N  K*K:L*MJK M*LL7*LJJ N  N  5*M:K*KM9 5*IJ7*IJ9 N  N  JKJ*I95 JL7*6LL C4& L*JKK*K:K 9*LIL*M69 57*LKI*J7K 5J*K56*IL: H :*IIL*5KL H I*:M5*KJ9 H I*ML7*M95 H :*II5*M55 X Y Z `a[bXc; db bce fg;dedgb Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---  ( ,0+23/+2.2 4,+5-5+40* 5+.,2+3*0 7 '("89 7     # @ 4 4-.+2,5 @ # @ @ @ @ C"'D ?C # # @ ( 2 @ @ ) 52.+34* @ 52.+34* @ 40+5/,+05- 5+.4*+*54 7 7 '("89 D# @ 2-5+554 2-5+554 @  7 '("89 @ @ @ 5+20-+2/. !@J6J ,+.20+2,3 @ ,+.20+2,3 @ @ @ @ D 0*2+/45 2+-5,+33* C ,3+2*-+0.3 05+2..+505 ; 7 0.+,05+344 */+,25+544 ,0+*43+-5/ 0-+,2.+024 .4+5/-+50- GJ66GKLJIKMKJ6KL6 B B9" ,+2.2+505 4+520+0.5 @ B #@J6J @ @ < DK 7 # 2+22*+..4 @ IENEIEE     !#C"F"89 D"77 D ?C # # 252+.42 ,+420+.24 ,+5//+455 @ D 445+/23 @ 445+/23 @ D"8# 7 #C"F"89 422+530 @ 422+530 @ ! #!C"F"89 .04 ,/+505 ,2.+/22 N; #C"F"89 0.4+0*5 305+--- # 2+0*0+25- ,+0-2+5,2 7 #C"F"89 D# @ @ D#C"F"89 @ D#C"F"89 ) 2*.+44, /+05.+44, A 9'"8'9'!F @ ; 7 # ,,+355+00- 0+04.+33- GJ66GEAJIKMKJ6KL6 G < 7 # @ @ @ 5+,02+522 )C9;F C B9" 22+.30 @ )C9;F C @J6J @ @ @ @ < DE 7 # 22+.30 5+,02+522 ABKEEKA     A ( 43+5,.+5/5 ..+22,+355 6 $ ;O @ @ @ L D /+205+-34 ,4+*.2+432 03+5*/+..2 /*+00-+20-  P  C! )8 2-+4-44 ) RSQTUQ  F' H " ) / Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   
  /012345 525752/45 8 8 725502499 725502499 32990204B 5312B91 8 8 C52DD12347E C52DD12347E F=GHI(AJ*K*?.'%%.J 1DB200D 8 8 8 C1DB200DE C1DB200DE B7020B7 731271D 8 8 C3012D91E C3012D91E 7274/2100 7742140 8 8 C729B32959E C729B32959E 3D2431 1B2599 8 8 D2B44 D2B44 B1D2/13 7B2197 192904 8 C1/521B4E C1/521B4E 52450 8 8 14D271B 1412B7D 1412B7D /20DD 8 8 8 C/20DDE C/20DDE 42DBB2B3B 52DB02405 192904 14D271B C3210/2455E C3210/2455E * * * 02/7B2D01 /21D42504 8 7442B93 D5D299B D5D299B 3299D2D9D 329712/1B 8 44/2999 4D42530 4D42530 B2B3421DB B2B492DDD 8 B11275B B40215D B40215D 7213B2B10 720B725/B 8 8 17B2D1D 17B2D1D DBD2507 D542B41 8 8 C392D7DE C392D7DE 7/24B52D/B 59245/204D 8 723D/2450 523B42D99 523B42D99 [PHONE REDACTED] 5323002B1/ 192904 720142DD3 C3210/2455E 523B42D99 C727352/55E 727B123// 8 8 8 C727B123//E 520742DD9 8 520742DD9 321402D75 31D2199 8 31D2199 8 725D/2/BB 8 725D/2/BB 8 721352594 8 721352594 8 540290B 8 540290B 8 7429B4 3125B7 B9239D B2345 49/2BD3 8 49/2BD3 1/B239D 512549 8 512549 8 CD02B39E D02B39 8 8 42D7B2DDB 7752D07 420502BB4 32/4/2307 3255427B3 5214/2107 B24/B2431 520712/05 31243B2B51 1D279/2705 072D112D94 C02/D/2/0BE 3D204724DD 1/2BD02443 0D21192319 C4274B2993E de egd"h ij
 / Docusign Envelope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ocusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       !5 67#6""#&$8  !5          !5 A&66#"'%B !A9 A667#777B  ! A&8>#$7$B )   A=%&B   !3   A8%#"7>B E 8#=6%#68' E   88 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   0/00 123456784 =3?;9@A;7=3 1=B293C23;:6 12329:6@3> 759:9D@3> E  F  . G.H HKL MLK HNN O H HH. .NN  G/M 0L0 O O O G/M 0L0 I H.0 0/G O O O I H.0 0/G 0 GKI GLH L LNM O O 0 GL/ MKN 0GL /LM O O O 0GL /LM KI MNK G M/G O O KL O H/ /LG O HGK IHM M/K 0.I T" I/ I/ .HK O O 0/ .HK     L GN. IGK MHH H0I HNN HGK IHM I/ 0.0 E 0MM IL/ O O O 0MM IL/ 0K .GG O O O 0K .GG N0/ .0G O O 0 N00 .0G O O O O IN. KKK O O O IN. KKK 0LN /MN O O O 0LN /MN I N/I HNG O O O I N/I HNG I M/I 0H. O O O I M/I 0H. NH HIL O O O NH HIL N/K HKM O O O N/K HKM IK/ .0G O O O IK/ .0G HII KHI O O O HII KHI .M HG/ O O O .M HG/ V#Y /IH O O O /IH IG/ L0/ O O O IG/ L0/ KII O O O KII O MH/ LHH O O MH/ LHH O O O  O O HNN O HNN O O O 0 G0L 0 G0L     K MI. HI0 MH/ LHH HNN H G0L L .LN I IKN KMM . MKK O HG0 MIK I GHM LHN  ] O O O O O \I 0IG O O I I.L \KL O O O O O 0H 0G/ O O O 0H 0G/  ] \I IN0 O O I I.L \MH 0K/] \I0 MLL] . MKK O I MN/ I MNI MKN H NLG M0I NN. O \HN/ .0N] H 0G0 GM/ H 0IL .NL M0M MK/ O I II/ 0GI M LMH 00N ` I0 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   .&/0!1011 5!675!687   5!67?!660 3  AB1/!886C 881!886     81?    /10!000 571!786    A57!5B6C ?11   3   A6/!/67C   ; K10!010 /!11?!56/ ; 5/ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   2122 34564789:6;< 56@674= 674= 4BC54D=9 E7F4BC54D=9G H    I  0 J00 KKL 0 J00 KKL 0 N0J 0L0 211 OJ2  LKQ L11 LKQ L11 N1O 2R2 J2N LR2 L 2N1 111 L 2N1 111 L J02 21N LK2 21N 2 K0O L0K 2 K0O L0K 2 NKL NRJ TN0 JO0U 2JO 111 2JO 111 2NR 1RO 20 1RO NR 111 NR 111 KL OQK 0 OQK L L0R 1K0 L L0R 1K0 + TL L0R 1K0U X" + + L1 111 L1 111    Q 1OQ 1RL Q 1OQ 1RL R NQ0 LNK T0NO QLJU    H  OL0 KRK OL0 KRK 2OO LR1 2OR N1K 0O KLL 0O KLL 2K 0NN R 0JO L 1JR KJ2 L 1JR KJ2 Q21 02N L2R JLN + + + + LQN LKR LQN LKR LQ0 KKK 2 J1L 0J1 JKQ 0J1 JKQ 2RQ 1OQ OL J21 L Q1L JQO L Q1L JQO L Q1L JQN TLU L JK1 0R0 L JK1 0R0 L O1L 2J0 T01 RN1U LL1 JJ2 LL1 JJ2 QJ JLR LN 12J L 1QJ KOO L 1QJ KOO Q1K JKO LRK 2R1 LKL KJ2 LKL KJ2 LK1 02N L JLN JLL JKJ JLL JKJ JLL KJL T2NKU OJ LO1 OJ LO1 0O JN1 LR NQ1 0L2 ONO 0L2 ONO 0J1 1LJ T2K JJQU LN2 JKK LN2 JKK LN1 R21 L NOK 0LL N2R 0LL N2R 01J KLL N QLK L L0R 1K0 L L0R 1K0 + L L0R 1K0 Q 2KJ 1RL Q 2KJ 1RL K OL0 JL2 L KN1 NNQ  T2LO 111U T2LO 111U L LKQ KOO L 0QJ KOO  U 211 111 211 111 + 211 111 + + TL 2LN N10U TL 2LN N10U + + + + LO 111 LO 111 2J 2N1 Q 2N1  U + + TL2 ORRU TL2 ORRU J 201 QRN J 201 QRN J 201 QRN + J 201 QRN J 201 QRN J 2LR 0QR TL2 ORRU _ LJ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3233 4567589:;7<= 67A785> 785> 5CD65E>: F8G5CD65E>:H I    J  KLM NML KLM NML KLM NML +  + + + + + + + + L 322 L 322 M MQN R SQN + + + + S 322 S 322 S N2S 12S 1R 122 1R 122 K2 2MS M LMS W" RR K22 RR K22 R2 1KL XR 2N1Y    N1K SML N1K SML NKK K3R Q L1K    I  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + NL2 SML NL2 SML NK2 MKK 3Q MK1 NL2 SML NL2 SML NK2 MKK 3Q MK1  X1S 222Y X1S 222Y 1 NLL 1Q NLL  Y 1S 222 1S 222 + 1S 222 + + + + + + + + + + + +  Y + + 1 NLL 1 NLL N3R QQ1 N3R QQ1 N3R QQ1 + N3R QQ1 N3R QQ1 N3N NL2 1 NLL _ RN Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3233 4567589:;7<= 67A785> 785> 5CD65E>: F8G5CD65E>:H I    J  11K 222 11K 222 112 MNN OP2KQ  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T" + + + +    11K 222 11K 222 112 MNN OP2KQ    I  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + U#W + + + + + + + + + + + + 122 222 122 222 122 222 +  1K 222 1K 222 12 MNN P2K 11K 222 11K 222 112 MNN P2K  + + + +  Q + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +  Q + + + + + + + + + + + + \ K] Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3233 4567589:;7<= 67A785> 785> 5CD65E>: F8G5CD65E>:H I    J  + + + +  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 PQR S22 3 PQR S22 QPT RQS U3 RTQ 1SSV W" + + + +    3 PQR S22 3 PQR S22 QPT RQS U3 RTQ 1SSV    I  + + + + + + + + SPS 222 SPS 222 3 222 SP1 222 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + X#Z + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 2TP S22 3 2TP S22 3 P3] 3 2T1 ]T3 3 PQR S22 3 PQR S22 Q P3] 3 P1P ]T3  + + QP3 SRT QP3 SRT  V + + + + + + R R1] 2T1 R R1] 2T1 + + + + + + + +  V + + R P22 S_2 R P22 S_2 UQ_2 13_V UQ_2 13_V UQ_2 13_V + UQ_2 13_V UQ_2 13_V R RR2 3PR R P22 S_2 ` RT Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         ) 3 -.421.5// 3 2.616.1/4 3 7.217.0/5 3 467.427 3 76.-5/.-1- 3 7.627.2/2 3 99= 126.-A5 75/.02A -/-.5A5 74/.142 7.5/- 7.-10.201 B C!"D%*E B B B B B B 7//.47/ -50.A57 407.2// B B B 11/.105 B 9 6.542.A2- -.040.-41 2./6/.257 7.15A.676 46-.4-6 71.6-6.17/ 7.1-5./A- I=#9 B > /0.06- B 470./A5 B B -A2.224 B B 74.-2A B B B 74.-2A B J%#E 70A.4-2 464.776 6/.501 74.2AA B 60-./42 B E"D! -.7-7.644 5.76A.475 -4.AA7.72A 00A.166 -4-.77A 62.-11.262 B -.-/5.6AA 5.-56.1/- -4.410.5-2 0/-.766 -4-.77A 61.72/.404 B /.-76.62- 7-.744.AA5 -/.771.241 4.60-.22/ 211.-66 14.254./5A 7.1-5./A- LM8L KNMJKO KM 8KN8 -41.621 421.A66 -47.22/ 7/4.7A2 /6.020 7.70A.54A -41.621 421.A66 -47.22/ 7/4.7A2 /6.020 7.70A.54A JGQGJGG 99= ) %99! "E "FD 1A0.A67 762.-77 465.1/4 12.A10 710.2-7 7.4-6.1-4 4-.76A B 74.-6- B B B 74.-6- B B 7.0A1 71./-5 B B 7/.262 B L " > B B B B B B B Q=#E& ) B 9 B 77A.AAA /-2.AAA B B 562.AAA B 9 1A0.A67 415.-1A 7.7A7.247 12.A10 710.2-7 4.47A.24A 4-.76A I=#9 , B 7-0.626 7.221.514 B B 7.156.671 B Q=#E& ) B 04A.AAA 0.-1A.AAA B B /.A/A.AAA B 1A/.A05 601.547 25/.527 --5.4AA 720./0- 4.7/7.A46 1A/.A05 7.--6.-02 5.272.57- --5.4AA 720./0- 77.522.66A B LM8L GIMJKO KM 8KN8 2.-2A 6.751 2.41/ 4.5/6 7.-/5 75.7/0 2.-2A 6.751 2.41/ 4.5/6 7.-/5 75.7/0 CKGGKI -.-A7.120 4-./22.741 0/-.766 -4-.77A -1./72.-0A B B B B B B B B 6.77/.0/4 -.470.0/5 -.51A.421 7.612.41/ 7.75/ 74.01-.45- 7.171.11- 0.64A.6-5 3 77.00A.744 3 40./72.-/4 3 4.46/.674 3 -46.-A/ 3 65.20/.11- 3 7.171.11- 3 T  US     V WXTYZ[W\] ^X M 4A44 %99=,D%#H*#P 7/ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---               $ # ! & 25.536.046 23.753.1-5 2016.56/ 214.560.7-- 21.8/4.863 ! & ;5.816.141< ! & /.3/7.411 5.536.046 3.753.1-5 016.56/ 1.8/4.863 ) # & 1.461 $ & /.354.47/ 5.564.000 3.753.1-5 016.56/ 35.848.665 1.8/4.863 @ , ! C & 5-3.85/ @ ! C " 3/5.050 383.175 IC "J , " 350.13- 113.511 355.574 & 87.17- 300.051 333.171 + " & 37.574 & 38.630 1.873 38.074 CN $ 04.530 ! , -8.77- " C " = " @ 0-8.-87 143.555 ) % & & 87.5/5 171.103 " @ LL N & 35.16- $ 1/.600 , " "ED%"L 8/0./44 @ 81/./68 3.186.510 & 74/.-66 314.444 385.444 # & 83.508 @ & 8.57/.085 1.-73.653 5.174.715 0/4.073 1.8-8.014 565.8/- 3.174.315 $ @ " $ = ! 366.548 , L & = & 5.174 & @ < $ @ < 366.-86 3.334.716 & 081.175 674.156 = = 081.175 674.156 6.677.35/ 33.47-.766 10.111.470 3.781.643 3.604.411 0./14./8- 233.004.311 210.735.871 21.1/7./31 281/.847 2/-.507.668 23.636.668    c] D+ ) V W"L LA CN 84.1411 O + ! dD%"L& A C " $ A ) C " &E 3- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---               / 345364578 96487:43;; 9<4<==46=3 974><74836 9;465846=7 @=4:8;47>3A @74>=;486=A @6468=475=A @7646864<3:A @;457;4:<8A @<;;4566A @5784<>3A 2 @>6=4<63A @7334888A @654888A A @65:4588A 748>54>53 <3645;; / B , B B / B 7==4<86 @54>5:A @7457<4=36A , B B @7467:4758 7=45;: 74;=;436; 5574:57 6=54837 ;4=784:;7 <47884<37 774:854533 74<;643:5 64>:64=<6 964;<=43>> 9<45=54=>; 974<=74:>3 975463>46=6 9745<74<><         ! A <=<4653 9664;35 9@<646<3A 6;545=6 ) ( 7:47;5 334>:> * ) ( 34775 @774868A ( =>43;7 748>54>53 9<3645;; 974<==4<87 9<634;77 9643774::: 9@:;46>3A Z c]    + f ;8 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   122)3.4- 140+ 7*18,94: )35 )35 )35: (%C'D(E IDE'J(( L L L L L L (%C'D(E IDE'J(( OA;PAOA=A<     L L L  L L L L L L Q L L L Q L L L L L L <=!MA=AM    (%C'D(E IDE'J(( (%C'D(E IDE'J((  (I Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   !  !   ./012 34/5/2 677.8392 6950 .30:38; 3:.>35/2 @AABCBD$E F HI HI KL  M N+I F N+I  N+I HI NHO A'APCBD$E     F R,-SR R,-SR F F F  F F F  F R,-SR R,-SR DCV'W B$@$B$XDPW'KP'ME   F F F  F F F V@$X'B$$'C%DBCBD$E N+I KR,-OHM KI,RNNM  -++,HSS  -*I,S-R HSR,Y--  Z Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    (  2- 34  8-      7A3,          9                9    F      7 1      9   477    J9                K7  47 :9  7      11        J9  47 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                  01     0  01         1      0            ,      :3 0 >       '     D     18             3 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         & 1,   $5  & 2       &          A       A  &  & &  &  &       &   A  &     A &     & & & Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      33!#!"3 89:;<=9>?@G$IJ#M88     (                (    (    Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     (234526789:2;4:;< CD  8E<F3E<823G5HI5HJ: KALMA M M O#$RS#R!P M M O#$RS#R!P T @#PPO#UU" M @U#"UR#PRO M M VW+ P#@O>#$SS M P#!!S#$SS @#U>R#UU" M PU#!PO#UP"     GGJ4JH5<:Y :Z2:G35<38;' M T U#PPR#PPR M U#SRS#@@O $#!RR#PO> @PO#@RP M $#U@P#RU! VW+ @RP#"UO M @P#@R>#POP O$!#SSU M %:<88[I5HJ:' KALMA M M L@>"#OO@N M P#"!O#PP$ T O#@R@#PS$ @#@$S#OSO M P#!!U#OR" L@PO#@RPN M P#@OS#R>R VW+ L@R#"UON M @#OUP#>O@ $>#UO$#U"R SS$#SSU M 8E<F3E<823G5HI5HJ: KALMA M M M T M M VW+ @#SOS#R$! M M @#SOS#R$! M M     GGJ4JH5<:Y :Z2:G35<38;' U#!R! M $RO#PSO T R#PP>#O$U $PP#O>R M R#R>P#S$@ VW+ M @#URP#OP@ O#$"!#USO !$P#PR$ M O#U$O#"P" %:<88[I5HJ:' KALMA M M LU#!R!N M O!#RU! T M L$PP#O>RN M $#O$P#>OS VW+ $>R#>OU LSP#$"!N M L!$P#PR$N M   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    ./012/0.3245675689 < < ABC#&BD < ABC#&BD E (D#C"D#!B> < HI- < < < (B#B"B#D"!     448K86509L 9M3942502.NO < D!>#BCA E C#DDD#!&> < C#&CB#!B" HI- CA"#A!A (D$#$CB < B#B!C#"B$ DB&#"BB < P90..Q75689O < < < E < HI- < < ./012/0.3245675689 >B#&CA < < >B#&CA < < E >A#$CA#D(D < HI- < < D"#A$B#CD& < D(#(C$#BB>     448K86509L 9M3942502.NO A&D#&(D CA#A"B < CC$#D$! E (D#B"A#&C! < HI- < (C#BBA#$!$ < P90..Q75689O >B#&CA < < >B#&CA ;CA#A"B= < E ;>AB#C>A= < HI- D$B#&!C < < Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    -./01./-2134564578 ; ; ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, !#E!F#EGH ; ; !#E!F#EGH ; ;     337J754/8K 8L28314/1-MN ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, (E(#GF& ; $#HEF#""G (E(#GF& ; $#HEF#""G O8/--P64578N ; ; ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, ; FF"#EGG &GG#E$! ; FH!#(GG -./01./-2134564578 ; ; ; ; GH!#==E ; ; GH!#==E @ ; CD, (#"(G#EFF ; ;     337J754/8K 8L28314/1-MN @ E"F#GH( E"H#!(G CD, $E#H(H ; (#HHH#(H= O8/--P64578N ; ; ; ; ; @ ; F$H CD, ; ; Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       012#"34 6+ 2"#"38  142#$!$ 6 12#"1= 6+   $#1=8  7 $#144    !#"01#44= P P !#"01#44= P P R P P P P P P P P ST+ P P P P 4#!01#44= P P 4#!01#44=     IIMUMKJENV NWHNIGJEGCXY P 32$#0"" R P P P P P P P P ST+ P P P P P 32$#0"" !#"01#44= P P !#"01#44= O!10#"""Q P 0#31=#0"" R P P P P P P P P ST+ P P P P 2#428#84= O!10#"""Q P 2#334#84= N^NKCWUNXEME_CHGE\             Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    (  00  5657689:;8:76<6=>?>@8>69A:B6<6=>C9:@86:7@96D:;<:5657689E:F6@89:;=:968G>?6H:@I6H:@IJ69C:@G68@I6:9@K@8FA: L              X3   1            2 1Q  :\:]J6:^>CF:?;7_C69:C;:CJ6:B@96:`K@<:@86=>IJC68E9:b6C>86568656?6:@86=>IJC689A:]J6:^>CFE9:  vOl!#imm,   2 aba:?;9C:;=:K>G>9:7@96D:;<:CJ6:><:CJ6:9C@C6o>D6:@G68@I6:=>86=>IJC68E9:o@I6A L       2 1     2 2 X3 3   x3    3   3 Q  00     B6<6=>C9:@86:7@96D:;<:5657689E:F6@89:;=:968G>?6:@9:o6KK:@9:CJ6:=><@K:@G68@I6:9@K@8FA:I:=>86=>IJC68:5_9C:J@G6:}:      hTQ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    BC D BC D FGCHC ICHC JG JG BCC  PTU#NVM N#"OM#MN$ Z[\]^_`ab]ac[_a_defgh_ij`aeigegicbg]a\]kakbll_i_]m_`an_co__]a    NTN#"$! BC D BC D t6t FGCHC ICHC JG JG BCC  Z[\]^_`ab]ac[_a_defgh_ij`aeigegicbg]a\]kakbll_i_]m_`an_co__]a    U#MMM !V      ƒ {         ƒ   YGCLT"T#"PTC              ae_im_]c{ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     $6!"7 !6"+7 !6"+7  .7     8   8 :     6             EF9    5 kF         Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---          1      20B1      ,        1                   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    1245-+0 13 1245-+0 ))17%('12  B@C"A E JJ@""A C@""A K@""A BJ@""A C@$JA K@$JA OI OI B@J"A B@J"A R  K@BCA U@BCA R B$@$VA B$@$VA J@JJA !@UKA OI "@U"A "@U"A J@BJA !@"KA ?@8AB8C;DEFC;G89;=8H;:CG8?I8F=I?C<:9F?=89?8J;8KC;G;=9;L8F=89MFG89:JN; M?O;P;CQ8E=9FN8:8IENN8RSTH;:C89C;=L8FG8U? 4=8599; 95<7@ ? ? ? ? 4566459@= F;65@6=G ? ? ? ? ? ? F;65@6=G ? ? ? F;65@6=G 4599@54>4 <695974 45<><5<48 :<8858@9 :456465669  Y 8> Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      E9GB:A:@GA ?AGG:ABB    V E@;:G;BF H H H  [ P21.*2"&a.*+,4.b82-# a.."44'7)"20,232'1.#1'1$.%,2"24,"&#1"1.7.21#e =G Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       p ²³´µ¶³·¸¹º»³´¶»¸¹¼½µ¶¹¾¿³·³À¿·¸¹ÁµÂ»¶´¿³Ã¹ wp9%,010%31;*03*03-%(32Å*1+3-(+Åp’Ę¡¡pŸ‘’–p‘’p—’¡˜ º»É¸¿·³Àµ¹·³Ê¹¼´Ëµ¶¹Ì·´´µ¶Í¹ ¹ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       *+,-./0-/12345616/72819/59.5:!    <=>?@ABCDEBFA>GABCHCIEJK>??C RS%TUTV Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    " %  0"1 3 0"1  # # 5
789:97897;<8=;>?@A B6C DE7EF9G97;@A =AH7E787EIJA=A KL,6KLM EA=H=7E7H=EI/;E;9G97;AN O P # 6Q2$ " & # 5S  " & #  0 52 2 # T  " & #  4R 2P2 2 5 U " & # 5S 6O P # M W R #R232" 2 "3O P # 5  " & #  0 52 2 #  " & #  4W P #V V 6 P # W R #R232" 2 4 " & #  4W P #V V 5 5 4O P #  " & #  4R 2P2 2 5  " & #  4W P #V V 6 V"3S O # " ,B O # "3-'321" 2 ,C O #5 VR2 ,K  " & #  0 52 2 #60 % 2 " YV#$5 ,T  " & #  4W P #V #5 0 52 2 % 2 " YV#$5 ,U  " & #  4"5 Q560 % 2 " YV#$5 ,M  " & #  42$VR2" 0 52 2 2 5  " & #  52#2$VR2" 0 52 2 #  5  " & # 5 + Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    " % ./012.340556.7.89:6
8;<27:91<8=  B C "  E #DF B GG  B C # F #D GH <7I1818J18:8K1:649:9.7.89L:834KM.306.L=  " & #  E DF F PF> GQ  " & #  AR P #D E DF F PF> GT  " & #  A"D UDO# PF> GV WP2*78+1- Q,1*2*R3+43*S'-&'()*+'1'23RT-U8R3-V+*2W*/0'RT-42,-Q),*3-&'()*+'1'23R-78+-X','+40-QY4+,R>          H         A                                                                        A               ab^! c"de"f]g _ "ibc^   l8S'+21'23-Q),*3*2m-.342,4+,R>                                                        l8S'+21'23-Q),*3*2m-.342,4+,R       N n Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         M N  6(Q526(*(,.) RJ@4) Z[F)RJ@4) 72+A272.3F) 12.3) 4567(3) +77) 0577)   ) `bCa8c[c) eg) DCDC) `D8bCT8TT[) DCEcF) ) ) &/.+7)72+A272.2(<)0/6).'()12.3):(?6(+<(:)A3)`b8DcD8CDZF)&/.+7)72+A272.2(<)0/6)+77)05,:<)>(6() Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         $    34567869           C-/0D./DEF   C-/1FG/0DE  (     F2DDI    0/0E./J11   C0/1G0/-GE     KCFD0/D0FL  C-0G/DFD2    CD/EG0/JHD2M       C1/0HF/110   C1/10F/0--   C1/11J/-HE   CGJE/H00K0.0.L   CGHJ/GHD 0.1G2?          CG-1/-FJ/   C1/-EF/JJ1  ( '   '     '   [\]^_`abcd]e]bf]ghij\_^]k`i[\]^_`abclm\]bka`f^]g TnX`iTn d]e]bf] lm\]bka`f^]g Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---           !0 !  1   23456744189:71;36<41      0            !000!000$ 0 0       C    0 0 C    !D D!A 0    0  0  H
IJK LH
LJK 
MIK N
OK 
MMK L
PMK I
MK 
NHK J
OK LM
HJK H
IPK OIOL a`bTZUcU_T dYefW_j`Zk[ lWeZcZ] Q_`U`mW_ QfT_XZW_ jc[XTocXTZ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---  ! " ! % # #  &    +     *   0 0        )     $        &  ! 00   # "00 !0      % 4 5  &  !0 " " #    &   6          7  6              ! 00#&   ) < =>?@ABIKE?LIB< M 6 4MN65  M 26M 266  MN6  M 6   MN6    M   MN6     MN6     Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       + , . +12 , 11 , , +1 + 5 BCDEFGDHEI BHDIFEDLMK BMLDELL abcdebfghijk sofebtcueboreofjv {bjonxmpeh{eep {eephqh{moep ~mpnevvjoecp Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                     (             2  2    2                4               2   7 !        2                   >
BB? DB DCEBBBEBBB D@EBBBEBBB DEBBBEBBB D>EBBBEBBB D=BEBBBEBBB D=CEBBBEBBB D=@EBBBEBBB FGHGIJKLMHN F
O
PQHN RJSGI VWSXYGZSPXLMHN Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                  43#) Docusign Envelope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ocusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   
  /0/12034/ 6078903:8 ; /0/:2078: 607/90791 607/90791 602170174 6210881 ; ; D6097/0/63E D6097/0/63E F?GHI(CJ*K*A.'%%.J 1:/0:43 ; ; ; D1:/0:43E D1:/0:43E 37309/7 /360989 ; ; D:3601:4E D:3601:4E /0/140391 //903/7 ; ; D/07820731E D/07820731E 360682 /:01/9 ; ; D:20:96E D:20:96E 44:0634 /30632 /60677 ; D4/30819E D4/30819E /0:930/31 ; ; 2/30/27 D3410181E D3410181E 440842 ; ; ; D440842E D440842E 209690472 609940989 /60677 /013:063: D:01190681E D:01190681E * * * 204:/0/92 10648092/ ; /8209/8 1130/:7 1130/:7 60:9/0784 :07810436 ; //30777 2::0:82 2::0:82 409910988 304260714 ; [PHONE REDACTED]/98 2830/98 /06810682 /08/90362 ; ; 4:80637 4:80637 8910799 92/0838 ; ; D280:71E D280:71E /803/7069: 67067803/6 ; :390:98 :073:09/9 :073:09/9 690/:9098/ 6602860/22 /60677 60:710967 D:01190681E :073:09/9 D146099:E /0/3/08/1 ; ; ; D/0/3/08/1E :06870824 ; :06870824 :08410731 :480477 ; :480477 ; 1370:92 ; 1370:92 ; /06940//6 ; /06940//6 ; 67:0436 ; 67:0436 ; 20418 6:0879 :6067: 4048: 461037: ; 461037: 33:0388 802:7 ; 802:7 ; V'(&JB%'J D/440721E /440721 ; ; 90::80238 /980813 903730936 40:780/71 60:4/0382 :066/04// 303960121 :0/330:17 :6061:0149 4:0228088/ 890/2/08/8 D/60/:30:84E :409:30364 480/710/26 2/08440879 D201810124E de egd"h ij
 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    *23,45 643/ 6,7 6,8429:406,  0.232=9,7 9,7 9,7 9,78 DDE'&%G H ICJ&'%(JK C'&L&'JCD ))D'EEE H H H ))D'EEE )LC')LJ H H H )LC')LJ  H H H H H  N H H H H H    D%D'CG( H H H D%D'CG( C'G%&'DE% DDE'&%G H ICJ&'%(JK C'GJE'(L(      TU>UTU@U?>VR WVR?XWU@YP TB$BBB"P      (J('J)J %C'&CD H H %(E'JEC  H H H N H H H H H D&%'G(D %C'&CD H H D%L'GL& R? ?MM?RUV M?\WMA?P  JD'LD( H H H JD'LD( WVR>T>VA?P P H H H H H  H H H H H  H D()'JJ% D()'JJ%  H H H ICJ&'%(JK ICJ&'%(JK C'(%&'JGE H H H C'(%&'JGE      C'(%&'JGE D()'JJ% H ICJ&'%(JK C'(E('ED&      C'G%&'DE% DDE'&%G H ICJ&'%(JK C'GJE'(L(   J Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       !5  !5          !5  ! )     !3   E E   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   0/01 234567895 >4@<:AB<8>4 2>C3:4D34<;7 2343:;7A4? 86:;:EA4? A4? A4? A4?@ F  G  0 HHH IIJ JH0 H0J .0L HJI M . NI/ .NO  J/0 .L1 M M M J/0 .L1 1 M M M 1 0 OIN 1HL I M M 0 OL. 0NL JN0 M M M JN0 H1 N11 H 1HI M M HI OIL 1 1.I 10 M I1N 1I/ 1 LON JN. T" 1I JLO 1H 11. M M .N O/L     L .0O N1H 0LN .0L HJI I1N 1I/ 1/ IO0 NJL F 00N O0L M M M 00N O0L 0I O11 M M M 0I O11 L.0 L1J M M 0 L.J L1J M M M M 1L0 LO/ M M M 1L0 LO/ 0LH N0L M M M 0LH N0L 1 HHI 0IO M M M 1 HHI 0IO 1 NJN OI/ M M M 1 NJN OI/ 111 M M M 111 L.1 .JN M M M L.1 .JN 1ON J/J M M M 1ON J/J J.O HLJ M M M J.O HLJ N0 0HI M M M N0 0HI V#Y IO. M M M IO. 1ON HJH M M M 1ON HJH 0LJ IJ0 M M M 0LJ IJ0 M JH/ M M JH/ M M 0IN M 0IN  M M JJ HJI M JJ HJI HJ N1. M M 1 0L/ OJO 1 .ON 1NL     H NH. JH/ .0L HJI 1 0L0 OJO L OOO 1LJ 1 O0O ILO JO L0N M \JHH JOO] 1 1LO .NN  ] M 1I M M 1I \1O0 /IL] M M M \1O0 /IL] 0HJ IOI M M M 0HJ IOI H M M M H  ] 10/ O/L 1I M M 1.I O/L 1 HJH N/N OJ L0N M \JHH JOO] 1 LOJ 0 JI. JI1 JNH /OI M \10 IO.] 0 L0H OIO J LIO N01 LL. M \JL/ .0L] J 0O0 ON/ ` 11 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   .&/0!1012 2!//6!786   801!167 4  @A2B!BA7C @12/!/60C     2!B8A    /0B!000 @22/!7A8C    @B!/ABC B70   4   160!21A   ; K71!0/7 1!/62!BKA ; 21 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   2123 4567589:;7<= 67A785> 785> 5CD65E>: F8G5CD65E>:H I    J  2 KLL MLK 2 KLL MLK 2 KKK OOP 31 M3K  3O1 111 3O1 111 P12 0M3 222 0M3 3 SK3 111 3 SK3 111 3 M10 0P1 002 0P1 2 KMK 2L2 2 KMK 2L2 2 LOS 3KM T332 1O0U 2PL 111 2PL 111 210 PS2 TP2 SPOU OS 111 OS 111 K3 S33 T30 POMU + + 3 30O 1K0 3 30O 1K0 X" 2K L11 2K L11 3O PML TM 31PU    K LK0 O2M K LK0 O2M M 211 02L 3 S2L PMK    I  S3P LKL S3P LKL 22S L2M 2OM 1PK 0S K33 0S K33 2O L33 K 311 3 131 02K 3 131 02K M02 M3P KK P30 + + + + 3M0 3PP 3M0 3PP 3M2 ML1 3OP 01L 1O3 01L 1O3 2MK S2M O SS2 3 KLP PP3 3 KLP PP3 3 KKO 2OL T30 OPSU 3 01S 0OS 3 01S 0OS 3 SPS LO1 T2P1 2MSU 32S OP0 32S OP0 333 10S 3P O1O 3 10K 13L 3 10K 13L M03 0PS 31S LK3 3K2 KOK 3K2 KOK 3LS P1P K 0O0 0MS 0SS 0MS 0SS P0L KMP TP3 P0MU M3 3S1 M3 3S1 S2 2KO 0O OK2 003 LO3 003 LO3 00M OL0 TO 3O2U 3LP 312 3LP 312 3LS KPK T3 LPSU 01P L01 01P L01 2MP OP2 M KOO 0L S11 0L S11 KP S30 T0O 130U K KOO O2M K KOO O2M K SK0 P01 23S 0MM  T33S 111U T33S 111U 3 L2L OML 3 KP3 OML  U 311 111 311 111 + 311 111 + + T3L2 1OMU T3L2 1OMU + + 2KP OLO 2KP OLO 3S 111 3S 111 K O01 TK 3K1U  U + + 3 KPK S1S 3 KPK S1S 2 PO0 PO3 2 PO0 PO3 2 PO0 PO3 + 2 PO0 PO3 2 PO0 PO3 P 201 MOL 3 KPK S1S _ 30 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3234 567869:;<8=> 896?@AB;=C 78B896? 896? 6DE76F?; G9H6DE76F?;I J    K  LM3 M3L LM3 M3L LM3 M3L +  + + + + + + + + M 322 M 322 P 2P2 PP2 + + + + Q 322 Q 322 M 4MP RMP 14 122 14 122 43 322 V4R 422W X" 44 L22 44 L22 4M 441 Y M41    Y3P P3L Y3P P3L Y4M 3RY V44 Y3RW    J  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + YLQ P3L YLQ P3L LM2 1M2 MQ LYL YLQ P3L YLQ P3L LM2 1M2 MQ LYL  V4P 222W V4P 222W LQ R3Y QL R3Y  W 4P 222 4P 222 4P 222 + + + + + + + + + + + + +  W + + QL R3Y QL R3Y LYM 2QP LYM 2QP LYM 2QP + LYM 2QP LYM 2QP Y34 RR1 QL R3Y _ 4L Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3234 567869:;<8=> 896?@AB;=C 78B896? 896? 6DE76F?; G9H6DE76F?;I J    K  112 LM2 112 LM2 13O LPQ R4 223S  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + V" + + + +    112 LM2 112 LM2 13O LPQ R4 223S    J  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + W#Y + + + + + + + + + + + + 3QM 222 3QM 222 3QM 222 +  PM LM2 PM LM2 PP LPQ 4 223 112 LM2 112 LM2 13O LPQ 4 223  + + + +  S + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +  S + + + + + + + + + + + + ^ 4M Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   3234 567869:;<8=> 896?@AB;=C 78B896? 896? 6DE76F?; G9H6DE76F?;I J    K  + + + +  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Q 133 222 Q 133 222 R4S 4R2 T1 S2U R32V W" + + + +    Q 133 222 Q 133 222 R4S 4R2 T1 S2U R32V    J  + + + + + + + + Q43 222 Q43 222 3 222 Q42 222 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + X#Z + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 ]42 222 1 ]42 222 4 3]2 UQU 3 U4] 1SQ Q 133 222 Q 133 222 4 3]3 UQU 1 23] 1SQ  + + TQ^^ QUUV TQ^^ QUUV  V + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +  V + + TQ^^ QUUV TQ^^ QUUV T43 RU1V T43 RU1V T43 RU1V + T43 RU1V T43 RU1V TQ]2 13]V TQ^^ QUUV ` 4U Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         ) -./01.2-0 3 -.405.-62 3 5.011.570 3 0.1--.506 3 055.6-/ 3 00.216.677 3 0.5-8.726 3 /20.688 -10.2-2 847.510 0-4.6-8 0.746 0.878.1/4 B C!"D%*E B B B B B B 0/4.461 67/.7/7 051.6/8 B B B /62.68- B : 8.227.0-8 8.0/2.682 5.671.17- 0.051.782 052.601 08.266.777 0./7-.406 B ? 74.470 B --7.024 B B 8-4.1/7 B B B B B B B B J%#E 021.-85 -6-.006 64.72/ 0-.511 B 628.4-5 B E"D! 8.655.446 7.1/1.812 8-./78.550 78-.0-8 -54.075 6/.611.1/1 B 8.2-5.101 7.81-.6-0 8-.720.215 766./-8 -54.075 62.-10.756 B 2.516.088 0-.6/7.454 84.6/0.272 -.175.5/1 605./15 /1.76/.758 0./7-.406 LM9L KNMJKO KM 9KN9 046.-02 0-5.7-/ 0/5.466 01-.-22 64.-11 046.-02 0-5.7-/ 0/5.466 01-.-22 64.-11 JGQGJGG ) "E "FD 572.7-2 08-.066 -70./06 060.477 4-.124 " B B B B B B B B 0.21/ 0/.487 B B 04.565 B L " ? B B B B B B B Q>#E& ) B : B 001.111 401.111 B B 7-1.111 B : 572.7-2 -68.451 0.004.658 060.477 4-.124 -.046.-12 , B 052.170 0.2-7.754 B B 0.442.167 B Q>#E& ) B 481.111 4.075.111 B B 7.1-5.111 B =0-.428A =4.411A =00.547A =2.064A =8.8/4A =68.224A =0-.428A 724.-70 7.708.8/7 =2.064A =8.8/4A 01.4/4.-20 B LM9L GIMJKO KM 9KN9 605.06- -48.222 828.28- -81.645 014./-0 0.600.252 605.06- -48.222 828.28- -81.645 014./-0 0.600.252 CKGGKI 8./-/.007 4.8/-.6-0 -8.282.5-2 766./-8 -54.075 8/.7-4.445 B B B B B B B B 8.1/-.185 -.2-2.665 8.646.5/1 442.724 04.-27 01.041.-72 0./21.1-- /./44.056 3 00.147.4// 3 -2.---.142 3 0.48-./10 3 -2/.626 3 62.017.04- 3 0./21.1-- 3 T  US     V WXTYZ[W\] ^X M 81. -1-0 02 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---               $ # ! & -./01.022 30.412.56- 32.06-.2/4 31.715.2/6 3561.727 3/4.408.68- 3/./85.7/5 ! & ;2.447.-80< ! & 8.//0.81/ 0.412.56- 1.715.2/6 561.727 ) # & 15.0/5 $ & 8./0-.706 1.715.2/6 561.727 @ , ! C & 518.072 154.125 @ &87.58- ! C " IC "J !+"6.768 , " 174.//1 & 8/./66 + " & 18.215 & 2/.472 0.217 10.764 CN $ 5/.464 ! , 66.2/8 " C " = " @ 264.10/ ) % & & 15.772 " @ /12 LL N & /0.425 $ 51.048 , " "ED%"L 087.844 @ 018.254 1.167.788 15/.424 & -05./45 102.444 # & 05.277 @ & 0.816.618 /.000.726 8.801.65- 700.620 6/4.-/8 807./24 $ @ " $ = ! 176.517 112.444 , L & = & 0.18- & @ < ;8.811< $ @ < 177.022 & 602.778 = = 602.778 2.56-.672 /5.0/6.614 1.0-2.010 80.667.771 5.566.128 311.46-.655 3/7.///.467 31.60/.541 3/75.878 387.14-.16/ 31.574.4//    c] D+ ) V W"L LA CN 04./4/1 O + ! dD%"L& A C " $ A ) C " &E 16 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---               / 345654377 8947:94;;6 8<4=;64676 854:394;<9 8;747=643=< @:4:6<4>99A @54;;64=96A @:63465;A @554>;5497=A @;476>4;9;A @>7=4=>5A @;496:466>A 2 @3>;4>69A @5334777A A @9=>4=77A =>54<59 54;7643== 543:3496< / B , B B / B 5>64:5> 55<4777 @=4=55A @54=964655A , B @9;6433=A @5564577A 2 364<:7 @54=3746=6A @5564577A / , B ! , 574:7< 945=3 594><= <6946;> ;47;:463= ;456>49>< 349=34779 549:=4=67 ;4:574>;5 8;465<4;=> 8<45774<35 8547;;4<5= 8554>7=4=33 854<;943>=         ! A 6;743;= 8547<74;;< 894775433> 8;=745;6 95=4<:7 ) ( @:<4>65A @9:477;4763A ( @37473:A =>54<59 854;7643== 8543:3496< 85<34=3= Z c]    + f 53 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   233*4/5. 251, 8+29-:5; *46 *46 *46; J J J J J J MBB=     J J J  J J J J J J O J J J O J J J J J J =>!KB>BK     Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---   !  !   /0123 450603 788/94:3 7:61 /41;49< 4;/?4603 HIJ .,-IJ LM  N O  HIJ .,JPH B'BQDCE$F     O SPH SPH O O O  O O O  O SPH SPH EDV'W C$A$C$XEQW'LQ'NF   O O O  O O O VA$X'C$$'D%ECDCE$F *JP  -**,IYY L*I,*YHN .HH,+HH   Z Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    )  3. 45  9.      8B4-       05    :      205    05           F 0   0    8 2 0   0    :   588         0           K8  58  8  05   00   22         58 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                  12     1  12         2      1            -      ;4 1 >       (     D     29             4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         ' 2-   $6  ' 3  90      '          B       B  '  ' '  '  '       '   B  '     B '     ' ' ' Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      456#!$4 LCHCA?MN??O/)  QR LCHCA?SN??T  LCHCA?VN??W - $8 FGJC>CIJ?>=IY?CZ=J?>=IYN,0\-0  /   /  a               a         Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     2  45+  6' 2'  +   + +        '                    +  E     +   +  + 4  1  Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    34 72 5 84
26
5 $9   )    )     )         =Bf%k"#gig    ) 0 0               Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     )34563789:;3<5;<= CD  9E=F4E=934G6HI6HJ; KALMA M M O#$RS#R!P M M O#$RS#R!P T %!#$O"#SRO M M M VW, M P#%O?#$SS P!#%P?#SP% M     GGJ5JH6=;Y ;Z3;G46=49<( !#OPS#P!% M T U#%!U#OUP M U#PPR#PPR %PO#%RU M $#!RR#PO? VW, %RU#?U$ M O%U#UO? M %P#%R?#POP &;=99[I6HJ;( KALMA M M L%?"#OO"N M T O#%PP#?%P %R#UUO M O#%R%#PS$ P#POP#"$U L%PO#%RUN M P#!!U#OR" VW, M $?#S?U#OPR M $?#UO$#U"R 9E=F4E=934G6HI6HJ; KALMA M M M M T M M VW, SU#RPR M %#SOS#R$! %%#SUP#"U% SU#RPR M     GGJ5JH6=;Y ;Z3;G46=49<( $US#SU$ U#!R! M T $PP#O?S M R#PP?#O$U VW, M S#OO?#"%O !%P#UR" M O#$"!#USO &;=99[I6HJ;( KALMA M M LU#!R!N M T M L$PP#O?SN M VW, $OU#R!? M $?R#?OU L$!O#?%PN M  $O  Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    ./012/0.3245675689 < < ABC#'BD < ABC#'BD E < %D#C"D#!B> HI- < %C#D'D#D"D <     448K86509L 9M3942502.NO D"C#$$B < E C#%!B#C>A >%A#A>B < C#DDD#!'> HI- AA%#'A> 'B#AC$ < CA"#A!A < B#B!C#"B$ P90..Q75689O < < %B"#CDC < E B#>D%#A!B < HI- < '#$BC#DAC < ./012/0.3245675689 >B#'CA < < >B#'CA < < E >A#$%!#CAD A$#CD" < >A#$CA#D%D HI- < D"#$''#CAD < D"#A$B#CD'     448K86509L 9M3942502.NO CA#A"B < A'D#'%D E < %D#B"A#'C! HI- < %A#A'B#>B' < %C#BBA#$!$ P90..Q75689O >B#'CA < < >B#'CA %#CC%#AB" ;CA#A"B= < E < HI- %AD#!!B < D$B#'!C ;BDB#C>'= < Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    -./01./-2134564578 ; ; ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, ; !#G!H#GEF ;     337J754/8K 8L28314/1-MN ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, ; ; O8/--P64578N ; ; ; ; ; ; @ ; ; ; ; CD, 'HG#"H! ; 'FF#=H! ; 'EE#G$! -./01./-2134564578 ; ; ; ; EF!#==G ; ; EF!#==G @ ; CD, %#"%E#GHH ; ; %#"%E#GHH ; ;     337J754/8K 8L28314/1-MN $GF#F%" @ G"G#GE= F!G G"H#EF% CD, ; O8/--P64578N ; ; ; ; $%E#HEG ; @ :F!G< ; CD, ; ; Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       112#33! 5, 78#$3$  5 5,   $#1"8  6  2%1#12>   P P P R P P P P P P P P ST, P P P P 2#81"#!"1 P     IIMUMKJENV NWHNIGJEGCXY %2!#71" %2!#71" P !37#1"" R P P P P P P P P ST, P P P P %2!#71" %2!#71" P !37#1"" P O%2!#71"Q P R P P P P P P P P ST, P P P P 2#$33#111 7%7#>8$ P 2#>28#8>7 N^NKCWUNXEME_CHGE\             Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    ) 67689:;<8:=8>?@?AB8?A9CDE;D8?;8FE;DG8:A8>8E;88E@DCEBD8;E>EC_K8`8=?CD=?BHEC_K8 L              X0   1            15  8x8oHD8p?<_89:AEA8EAG8EA;8 .Q0    0  R11 01      0 V5QM/ 0   X0 10 QM/   3S SSS5  51,52R5 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    CD E CD E GHDID JDID KH KH CDD  T    %$q#NON CD E CD E t7t GHDID JDID KH KH CDD     P#OOO         SvIK      idf^jcY]]^z^_]^         b\Z]_dZ^Y]]\`^lY]^kY]\h^dZ^`X\^W_`eg]^]XYf\^di^jdZ`f_km`_dZ]^_Z^`X\^ŒŒ^b\Z]_dZ^bcYZ^f\cY`_Ž\^`d^`X\^`d`Yc^ ^b\fj\Z`~        Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---     $6!"7 !6"37 !6"37  %7   EF9    5 KF                       8   8 :     6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---          2      31B2      -        2                   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    2356.,1 24 2356.,1 .)0,3 .)0,3 **28&)(23  %AC"B D"A$"B E JJA""B CA""B KA""B %JA""B CA$JB KA$JB OI $A""B $A""B OI %AJ"B %AJ"B R  KA%CB UA%CB R %$A$VB %$A$VB JAJJB !AUKB OI "AU"B "AU"B JA%JB !A"KB =I WJA!JBX WKA!JBX WYA!JBX G [   WVJ#!""X W$#CCV#""CX G [   W%#VYJ#Y%%X !K R XG>  R XG> RGT I   HI I RGT    A?SANMA RZ    HI  HI  P   @A      Z     Z  [   [    [    WJA!J   SNS WYA!J     A Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    ,-.*/012304/56/787/9:,1/;0<172519.,801-20-/7=5=:,>>,?=( KAD LM $"Q#QR! $#TQ$ W  FPA Q#VR% $#VQ! U#%"Q UQ#"TR LQ#RU"N RX#Q%R PA QU#UXX L%#"UTN QR#U$% PA QV#U"" X#X$% VV#R$% UXU $U#R"T OEPA $Q#T"V L%#T%VN Q$T#$$V T#VQ" Q!R#URV [  KADXJ!" ] X#QVX X#QVX X#QVX $T#!UU   P KADXJ!" ` Pa $^U"b XR#V%% X#RU" XX#%QX %"%#TVX %"Q#RQQ %#VQ" %"R#%TQ Pa Q$Q#U$R KADXJ!" ` FWA Q#QT" %V#TQX %%#VXT Q#$V" %V#TQT Q#"%R %V#TQT !#UUU %V#TQT !#V!Q %V#TQX RV#Q"Q UX#$Q$ U$#$UR R#XRV UX#$Q% U"V FWA $$X#%UT Q%#VRV $U"#UQ! !U    P  F P dP   dP   Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    1 3 7#%89 6#"7/ 67#$6! %#89$  $89#7:7 1  7/#6/8   1   1   1 !7      DEED                       Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      1 4 %6!#86"   1 4 5"9#86" 5"9#86" 5"9#86" %#$55#86" 78:#86" 6#$7:#86"  B :#65" 4 5!7#876 :$6#595 $85#:7: 9!9#589 B 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 %%#96%#!68 !9                      Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---    012345678594:;4<=<4>?064@5;07A01514B1<4?@8AB8C;DEFC;G89;=8H;:CG8?I8F=I?C<:9F?=89?8J;8KC;G;=9;L8F=89MFG89:JN; M?O;P;CQ8E=9FN8:8IENN8RSTH;:C89C;=L8FG8U? > > 45==? 4567<57?< C5C<957C9 > 45 > > > 45<<65 > > > > > 4C;589< F44568CG > > > 4C;589< F44568CG 45C=;5?47 C7<5?88 4588;54?4 :C9858=4 :CC;5C7C :4597=5=CC  Y <7 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      ?9=A:ABA E9CB:@C>G EC:B><:CFCG H H H 9C@:F=@ H H H H H H H H H H 9C@:F=@ 9:C9B:A;< 9:F=B:BBA    V 9C@:FA= ?E99:;FCG H H H E9;G 9C@:F=@  [ P21.*2"&a.*+,4.b82-# a.."44'7)"20,232'1.#1'1$.%,2"24,"&#1"1.7.21#e Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       v ²³´µ¶³·¸¹º»³´¶»¸¹¼½µ¶¹¾¿³·³À¿·¸¹ÁµÂ»¶´¿³Ã¹ wv9%,010%31;*03*03-%(32Å*1+3-(+Åv’Ę¡¡vŸ‘’–v‘’v—’¡˜ º»É¸¿·³Àµ¹·³Ê¹¼´Ëµ¶¹Ì·´´µ¶Í¹ ¹ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       *+,-./0-/12345616/72819/59.5:!   <=>?@ABCDEBFA>GABCHCIEJK>??C R%STSS Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---
Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---       v — —   Î%Ì5»2-0+3)vtŒŽ‰vÀ¿¿–vÏ30,+(&*/9&030)-(2-0Ë%*Î%Ð50(%&%3-)Ñ*6+)-*7(0310º»%)Ñ*239*/590-*Î%Ð50(%&%3-)*,+(* ÓÇ! ÕÃ"Ö Ä"F Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---                                                     1                                    1                                   1                                                                   8                   9                                 1              LM  N  K P QRQQ Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      "  67 89  B+-C0/+D'E/F0G.)/-'10,'-H)'I4.+/C-C)3 J "   PQ2R'ST'U$VWERX'Q(YIS "    A#  LK Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---      & % ! - / - $ 1%2 3156 748591:.; B  =  GC   C C  OL
Q CA
D C >C =IQ T?C       H=C  CAC C  C =AC   GC H  WW Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---         !    + ,  5 . ) 7 9 !  3 !  !     < !   !   >?@ABCDBEFGHIAJB?KLMC ! N  #  
    
!   ,5 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Historic Water Rate Analysis Financials Fiscal Year FY2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Average User Rate (Residential)1 $26.40 $26.40 $26.40 Charges for Services 2,896,486 $ 3,015,689 $ 2,999,110 $ Miscellaneous Service Revenue 52,726 $ 63,763 $ 15,835 $ Grant Revenue - $ - $ - $ Capital Contributions 888,500 $ 115,000 $ 669,000 $ Interest Income 7,767 $ 2,396 $ 4,018 $ Total Revenues 3,845,479 $ 3,196,848 $ 3,687,963 $ Salaries & Benefits 658,759 $ 615,189 $ 815,304 $ Contractor Services 149,083 $ 153,031 $ 156,934 $ Operations & Maintenance 945,680 $ 880,657 $ 1,248,430 $ Interest Expense 35,056 $ 27,316 $ 26,056 $ Miscellaneous3 661,005 $ 155,737 $ 171,896 $ Total Expenditures 2,449,583 $ 1,831,930 $ 2,418,620 $ Change in Fund Balance 1,395,896 $ 1,364,918 $ 1,269,343 $ Depreciation2 311,777 $ 529,144 $ 589,087 $ Total Expenditures + Depreciation 2,761,360 $ 2,361,074 $ 3,007,707 $ Net Reserve $1,084,119 $835,774 $680,256 3) Miscellaneous expenditures includes miscellaneous expense, bad debts, conservation, tax equivalents paid to the General Fund, administrative services, and legal services. Historic Data Revenues Expenditures 1) User rate is the base rate. An additional $1.29 per 1000 gallons is also charged. 2) Depreciation is an accounting adjustment; does not represent an actual transfer of money out of the utility. $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 FY2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total Revenue Total Expenditures Net Change in Fund Balance Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Water Rate Impacts Water Rate Evaluation Fully Funded Priority 1 Improvements 50% Grant Funded Priority 1 Improvements Existing Water Bill $26.40 $26.40 Priority 1 Project Cost $25,570,000 $25,570,000 Grants $0 $12,785,000 Funding Source/s DEQ DEQ Loan Principle $25,570,000 $12,785,000 Interest Rate 2.13% 2.13% Term (yrs) 30 30 Annual Payment $1,161,415 $580,707 User Rate Increase $22.61 $11.30 Total Annual O&M $0 $0 User Rate for O&M $0 $0 User Rate Increase (O&M Included) $22.61 $11.30 User Rate Percent Increase 85.6% 42.8% Total New Water Bill $49.01 $37.70 Loan Evaluation Additional O&M 1 1) Priority 1 projects consist of infrastrucutre replacements and are not expected to casue a significant increase in O&M. Rate Impacts Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX G DEQ Sanitary Survey Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Brad Little, Governor Jess Byrne, Director 650 Addison Avenue West, Suite 110, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 (208) 736-2190 March 31, 2022 By email: [EMAIL REDACTED] City of Burley PO Box 1090 Burley, ID 83318 Subject: Sanitary Survey conducted on 03/01/2022 – ID5160008 Dear Mr. Reiter: A sanitary survey was recently conducted for City of Burley (ID5160008). Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the sanitary survey report and photos for your records. Any significant deficiencies identified in the report are required to be addressed following consultation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Consultation and a written corrective action plan are required within 30 days regarding any significant deficiencies and/or follow-up requirements identified in this written notification, as required by IDAPA 58.01.08. Please follow the four steps identified in the sanitary survey report to address all significant deficiencies. Be advised that modifications to your public water system may require the assistance of an Idaho licensed professional engineer and require DEQ review and approval prior to making water system modifications or installing new components. Please contact this office before making modifications to your system. Thank you for your help in completing the sanitary survey. Contact Cassandra Lemmons at the DEQ Twin Falls Regional Office at (208)-737-3871 or [EMAIL REDACTED] if you have any questions. Sincerely, Cassandra Lemmons, MBA, REHS Drinking Water Compliance Analyst CDL:tjp Enclosures Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Sanitary Survey Report March 31, 2022 ID5160008 City of Burley RE: Sanitary survey conducted on 03/01/2022 Narrative The City of Burley is a large water system served by 6 groundwater sources and 3 storage tanks. Wells 2 and 3 pump directly to the city’s distribution network, while Wells 4, 5, 6 & 7 all pump to storage structures. Pumphouses 4, 5 & 7 are equipped with booster stations and standby power with automatic transfer switches to send stored water to the distribution network. The system has 2 pressure zones separated by one PRV. Some of the pumps in the system are VFD controlled, and some are not. The north pressure zone of the system served by Well 4 & Storage 4 lies north of the Snake River and therefore affords some logistical constraints in serving and expanding that portion of the system. The south pressure zone is that area south of the Snake River. Storage structures provide approximately 4.75 million gallons of finished water storage which is approximately the peak summer daily demand volume. System utilizes both erosion fed calcium hypochlorite tablets (at Wells 4, 5, 6 & 7) and gas chlorination (at Wells 2 & 3) as a means for disinfecting the system voluntarily. Entire system is monitored by SCADA and all operators have 24/7 access to the system utilizing their cell phones. Facilities are secured with door alarms connected to the SCADA system. The city also owns and operates 2 additional sources, 2 storage structures and a booster station. The Burley Industrial Park (near the west end of the city) and Gossner Area (near the east end, within reach to connect to the City of Heyburn) are currently not regulated due to low population counts and not being directly connected to the city’ infrastructure. At the time of this survey neither of these sources and tanks were evaluated. The city will regularly review the population of these systems to determine whether they should become regulated. Significant Deficiencies A significant deficiency as identified during a sanitary survey, is any defect in a system’s design, operation, maintenance, or administration, as well as any failure or malfunction of any system component, that the Department or its agent determines to cause, or have the potential to cause, risk to health or safety, or that could affect the reliable delivery of safe drinking water (IDAPA 58.01.08.003.131). Failure to address significant deficiencies constitutes a violation of IDAPA 58.01.08.302 or 58.01.08.303. Significant deficiencies may reference IDAPA design standard requirements. IDAPA rule citations for sections 500-549 are primarily requirements during the design or modification stage of a new system or component and may not be enforceable as part of a sanitary survey. These have been listed to provide reference of what current standards would apply if that particular component were designed, modified, or constructed today. Corrective actions that include material modifications must be approved by the Department. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 A list of findings for your system has been summarized below. In order to address all significant deficiencies, follow steps 1, 2, 3, and 4. Step 1: Within 30 days of receiving this notification, submit to me in writing a corrective action plan including planned completion dates for each identified significant deficiency. Step 2: Complete the planned action(s) by the “Planned Completion Date(s)”. Step 3: After completing each planned action, enter an “Actual Completion Date”, your initials, and write the “Corrective action taken”. Step 4: Sign your name at the bottom certifying that each corrective action has been corrected by the planned completion date and that your public water system has completed the sanitary survey response requirements pursuant to IDAPA 58.01.08. Send me a copy of the signed paperwork. Plan of Action for Significant Deficiencies: Storage: The storage structure Storage tank 4 was observed to be leaking at the time of inspection (IDAPA 58.01.08.544.09). There was a small leak near the overflow piping. See photo 43. A leak in the storage structure indicates tank damage and creates an environment where algae, bacteria, and pathogens can grow and potentially lead to a waterborne disease outbreak. Leaking water will drain water away from the tank and cause erosion to the exterior of the tank and the area surrounding the tank. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: Distribution: #20: All installed backflow devices and assemblies owned by the PWS are not tested annually (IDAPA 58.01.08.552.06.c and 552.07). Backflow devices installed for treatment protection were not tagged as recently tested. Ensuring that all installed backflow devices and assemblies are annually tested can help prevent the likelihood of a backsiphonage or backpressure event. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 Disinfection: The following deficiencies were found in both gas chlorine rooms (Wells 2&3). A bottle of ammonium hydroxide (56% ammonia solution) is not available for chlorine leak detection (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.05.b). Ammonia vapor detects chlorine leaks by forming a white cloud upon interaction of the chemicals. For safety of personnel when changing chlorine cylinders, always check for leaks. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: A leak repair kit is not provided and/or is not approved by the Chlorine Institute (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.05.b). A leak repair kit contains devices and tools to contain leaks in and around the cylinder valve and in the sidewall of chlorine cylinders. The Chlorine Institute has developed equipment and techniques for the safe production, distribution, and effective response to chlorine incidents. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: The leak detector is not equipped with both an audible alarm and a warning light (IDAPA 58.01.08.552.04.a.vii). An audible alarm and warning light can alert personnel to proceed with caution and to follow safety policies (wear PPE, ensure ventilation) before entering the chlorine room. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: #11: Each room where chlorine gas is used does not have an operational ventilating fan with a capacity that provides one complete air change per minute when the room is occupied (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.04.a.iii). Lack of a ventilation fan that has the capacity to provide one complete air change per minute poses a potential health risk to anyone that enters the room in the event of a chlorine leak. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 4 #12: The ventilating fan, where chlorine gas is used, does not take suction near the floor as far as practical from the door and air inlet, with the point of discharge to the outside, above grade, and so located as not to contaminate air inlets to any rooms or structures, with louvered air inlets near the ceiling (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.04.a.iv. and 531.04.a.vii). Chlorine gas is heavier than air and will collect at floor level. To avoid any possible contamination the fan must take suction near the floor as far as practical from the door and air inlet and discharge outside at a location away from air inlets to any rooms or structures. Air inlets must be located near the ceiling to facilitate the air circulation into the chlorine room. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: #13: The ventilating fan for the gas chlorination room discharges outside to areas that may be occupied by personnel or visitors (IDAPA 58.01.08.501.14). Gas chlorination systems that are located in public areas or near facilities where people may occupy, need to be ventilated in such a manner that fan discharges are not harmful to public health. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: #14: The chlorine room is not provided with doors equipped with panic hardware, assuring ready means of exit and opening outward only to the building exterior (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.04.a.i). Lack of a panic bar and outward-opening door are a safety concern to the operator. To assure a ready means of exit, the doors must open outward only to the building exterior. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: The following was found at the gas chlorine room for Well #2 only: #17: The chlorine room has a floor drain(s) that is not sealed during normal operation and/or is connected to another drain system (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.04.a.viii). A floor drain in a chlorine room that is not sealed during normal operation and/or is connected to another drain system is a potential health hazard for employees and visitors. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 The following were found at the gas chlorine room for Well #3 only: Gas chlorination equipment is not in a separate, sealed room (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.04.a.i). Openings between the chlorine room and the rest of the plant pose a health risk in the event of a chlorine leak. For safety, chlorine equipment should be enclosed, sealed, and separated from other operating areas. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: #10: All chlorine rooms, buildings, and areas do not prominently display danger signs warning of the presence of chlorine gas (IDAPA58.01.08.531.04.a.xii). Display danger signs to warn personnel and visitors of the presence of chlorine gas. Planned Completion Date: Actual Completion Date: Initials________. Corrective action taken: I certify, to the best of my knowledge that all significant deficiencies have been corrected by the agreed upon date and that the corrective action meets the requirements pursuant to IDAPA 58.01.08. Signature: Date: Deficiencies General Information: Material Modifications: DEQ has not approved plans and specifications for material modification that have occurred for the existing water system (IDAPA 58.01.08.504.03). System converted treatment plants for Wells 2 & 3 to gas chlorination. While it appears that the system may have previously utilized gas as a means of disinfection, the last documentation of gas chlorination was in the 2002 sanitary survey. Prior to construction of material modifications of existing public water systems, submit plans and specifications to DEQ for review and approval. A Qualified Licensed Professional Engineer may review and approve plans and specifications for simple water main extensions. This issue will be referred for enforcement as an Idaho Code § 39-118 violation if not corrected within 120 days of receiving this report. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 6 Storage: #14: Metal surfaces of the storage structure #7 are corroding resulting in tank damage. Give proper protection to metal surfaces by paints or other protective coatings, by cathodic protective devices, or by both (IDAPA 58.01.08.544.15). There was debris found inside the overflow screen possibly indicating that the interior coating of the structure might be deteriorating. Corrosion occurs when metal, an electrolyte, and oxygen are present. Alkalinity, pH, temperature, dissolved solids, and hardness can create an aggressive environment inside the tank. Corrosion may indicate that cathodic protection and protective coatings are needed to extend the life of the tank. Internal corrosion may lead to leaking and damage of the storage tank. Coatings can fail for several reasons, including improper surface preparation, application, and curing, use of the wrong type of coating, removal by ice or other environmental exposure, and lack of maintenance. Exposed metal surfaces that are submerged and then exposed to air corrode at an increased rate. Disinfection: The chlorine room for Well #3 is not provided with an interior shatter resistant inspection window (IDAPA 58.01.08.531.04.a.ii). Install an interior shatter resistant inspection window the next time material modifications occur to the chlorine room. For the safety of personnel, a fire-resistant, non-shattering inspection window allows the interior of the room to be viewed without entering the building. Recommendations Storage: Applies to all storage structures Date Last Inspected – Qualified personnel should conduct annual inspections of all storage tanks for structural integrity, protection from contamination, proper ventilation, and screening, and level of silt build up, etc. The storage module of the DEQ sanitary survey form may assist in conducting this annual inspection of each storage facility. The sanitary survey form is available on the Public Water System Switchboard at www.deq.idaho.gov/pws-switchboard. Date Last Cleaned – Qualified personnel should clean all storage tanks every three to five years. Sediment may harbor bacteria, pathogens, or other organisms and create the potential for a waterborne disease outbreak. Tank sediment may become disturbed during heavy demand periods and release these pathogens into the distribution system. The cleaning of any storage tank should be coordinated with the DEQ regional office. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 6 3 0 Distribution: PWS Treatment: Name: Responsible Charge Operator (DO): PWS Name: Name: Title: E-mail: Name: Title: Name: Title: Name: Title: Name: E-mail: Title: Name: Title: Phone: E-mail: Email: # 1 6 3 1 1 1 6 4 2 of 26 FALSE FALSE Properly Licensed? [PHONE REDACTED] Emergency Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Burley, ID 83318 Expiration Date: 11/15/2022 PO Box 1090 License Type/Number: Survey conducted by: [PHONE REDACTED] [EMAIL REDACTED] System Classification: Modules used: Sanitary Survey Index TRUE Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Cassandra Lemmons CO City, State, Zip: [EMAIL REDACTED] FALSE Properly Licensed? DWD2-17405 License Type/Number: Cassia Water System Type: 3/22/2017 # Service Connections: Date Closed: (Scheduled operating dates) Status: Legal Entity: GA Owner Type: local gov't Population: 10345 Water Purchased From: 3867 Water Sold To: State of Idaho Public Water System Sanitary Survey 3/1/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) Survey Date PWS # ID5160008 Mailing Address: # Storage Facilities: Total Storage (gal): Name of Public Water System: City of Burley County: Date of Last Survey: # Groundwater Sources: # Surface Water Sources: WATER SYSTEM INVENTORY INFORMATION DWD2 NA Seasonal Systems: Date Open: Substitute Responsible Charge Operator (OP): City, State, Zip: Phone Number: [EMAIL REDACTED] yes no n/a unk note General Information 2. If yes, were plans and specs submitted to and approved by DEQ? 1. Have material modifications been made to the PWS since the last survey? Color Key: Significant Deficiency Deficiency Recommendations/ Info Gathering/ Notification Mailing Address: Phone Number: Benton Palmer License Type/Number: DWD2-24055 1 Page Notes: Total Modules PO Box 1090 Burley, ID 83318 License Type/Number: Expiration Date: 8/17/2022 Emergency Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] 25 2 of the treatment plants (Wells #2 and 3) were converted to gas chlorination without propoer approvals. These plants were at one time designed for gas chlorination, but were changed to erosion feeders. Survey workbook is placed in order of the inspection and to keep treatment plants and storage tanks with their respective sources. 3. Were samples taken during the survey by the inspector? Emergency Phone: Health District/ DEQ Region: TFRO Physical Location (Township, Range, Section) : 10S22E, 10S23E & 11S23E (If yes, indicate what samples were collected in comments below) Legal Owner: City of Burley PO Box 1090 Burley, ID 83318 FALSE Bryan Reiter (Identify operator for GW-NC) Others Present During Inspection: IDEQ Health Dept. Mr. Ms. Yes No Approved Disapproved N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - GW/ NC Nontransient Noncommunity Community Transient Noncommunity-NC N/A No DO N/A - DO available 24/7 Mr. Ms. Yes No Mr. Ms. General Information Well Source Spring Source Storage Hydropneumatic Tanks Distribution Pumping Financial - Managerial Treatment Application Disinfection Gas Cl2 Notes Photo Log No OP N/A IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 General Information Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) w/source: w/source: 1400 FALSE 236 FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE 3. Are pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers applied to the well lot without approval? DNR gallons 58 psi. 2 Of 26 Source Activity Status: (Choice One) Source Availability: (Choice One) Source is directly connected to the distribution. 4. Well not in a pit. 10. Did not record flow reading. FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 20. Is the pump house protected from flooding and surface water entry? FALSE FALSE 1. Are surrounding land uses creating health hazards or increasing the FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE Notes: (Please indicate question number) (Locking cap, fenced, etc.) (Recommended) 19. Is there a history of pump house equipment freezing? (Inadequate heating) (connected to other drainage systems, sump <30' from well, etc.) 11. Is a working pressure gauge provided? (Instant, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 21. Does the configuration of the floor drain or sump cause a contamination risk? 18. Are there signs of equipment damage due to excess heat, moisture, or FALSE Static Water Depth (FT): Start-up (MM/DD): Shut Down (MM/DD): 42.535544 -113.791533 Readings at the time of inspection: Longitude (Decimal): WELL INFORMATION PWS # (Explain the Treatment Train in Notes) ID5160008 Treatment Processes: Is this Well Source Treated? 3/1/2022 Survey Date EDMS 2022ACA1190 Is there a well log for the source? Associated with: Tag Source Name: A separate form must be completed for each well associated to the PWS Is this source seasonal? Latitude (Decimal): Pump Capacity (GPM): 4. If the well is in a pit, is the pit protected from flooding and contamination? WELL SOURCE Page (Capacity of the well, air gap, prior to the first service connection, etc.) (Instant, totaling, nonvolatile memory, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE (pesticides, paint, herbicides, fertilizers, petroleum, etc.) (watertight walls and floor, floor drain, acceptable pit cover, etc.) pump house? 13. Is the well enclosed in a pump house? 17. Is adequate backflow protection provided on all threaded taps installed in the 16. Does the pump house have adequate lighting throughout? 15. Is the pump house protected from unauthorized entry? 14. Is the pump house protected from contamination? (Clean, in good repair, etc.) PUMP HOUSE (Only pump houses that contain a Groundwater Source) (Locked, durable construction, etc.) yes no n/a unk note (Floor drain, ground surface graded to lead surface water away, etc.) 403-disinfection without filtration Well #2 14th and Albion Physical Location: 8. Does the well casing and cap prevent contamination and surface water entry? 12. Is an adequate pump-to-waste provided? corrosion? (Inadequate ventilation) E0007520 10. Is a working flow meter provided? 9. Is a raw water smooth nosed sample tap provided on the discharge pipe? 7. Is the well properly vented? 5. Is the well (not located in a pump house) protected from unauthorized access? (casing height >highest flood level, >18" outdoor, >12" indoor, etc.) FALSE 6. Is the well protected from flooding? FALSE FALSE 2. Are toxic or hazardous chemicals stored on the well lot? potential for source contamination? (Setbacks not met, dumping, etc.) (24 mesh screen, open downward >18" outdoor or >12" indoor, etc.) (Prior to any treatment) Active Proposed Emergency Inactive Yes No Wellfield No Yes N/A Unk Unk Manifold Deficiency Significant Verified as accurate Verified as accurate N/A Yes Seasonal Unk No Permanent Interim Other IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Well Source Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) Treated Water (GPD): TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 3 Of 26 FALSE 11. Are the quantities of chemicals used measured to detect over or under dosing? FALSE 16. Are incompatible chemicals stored and handled separately? 12. Is backflow prevention provided on the water lines that discharge to solution tanks? (Air gap, internal feeder protection, etc.) FALSE FALSE 10. If water flow rates vary, are chemical feed rates proportional to flow? 15. Is space provided for storage and handling of chemicals? (Recommended) FALSE 14. Is the chemical feed equipment easily accessible? prevent accidental cross contamination? FALSE 17. Where multiple chemicals are used, are tanks and pipes clearly labeled to FALSE FALSE 13. Is a working anti-siphon valve or equivalent on each feeder to prevent liquid chemical solutions from being siphoned or overfed into the water supply? FALSE FALSE FALSE 26. Where provided, is the shower and eyewash station working? FALSE 22. Are chemical shipping containers clearly labeled? FALSE 25. Is personal protective equipment provided for each operator? FALSE (Chemical name, purity, concentration, supplier, ANSI/NSF 60 certified, etc.) FALSE outside atmosphere above grade and remote from air intakes? 20. Are floors smooth, impervious, slip-proof, and well drained? (Recommended) FALSE 21. Are vents from corrosive or hazardous chemical equipment discharged to the 23. Are acids and caustics kept in closed, corrosion-resistant containers? (Gloves, respirator, protective clothing, goggles or face mask, etc.) 24. Is secondary spill containment provided for all bulk liquid chemical containers? (110% of container volume) FALSE E0007520 Chlorine Chemical Manufacturer: ANSI/NSF 60 certified? connection to surface water? FALSE yes no n/a unk note yes no n/a unk note TREATMENT Notes: 1. Is water treatment required for public health protection? (Please indicate question number) (MCL exceedances, surface water treatment, pathogens, etc.) 4. No waste generated. 13, 16 - 24. Single gas chemical used. No solution tanks. from contamination? (Open downward, 24 mesh screen, air gap, etc.) 19. Are liquid chemical solution tanks provided with an overflow that is protected 18. Are chemical solution tanks protected from contamination? (Covered, sealed, etc.) TREATMENT APPLICATION & CONTROL A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) associated to the PWS. Well #2 TP E0007520TP Survey Date 3/1/2022 PWS # ID5160008 2. Have there been any interruptions in treatment in the past year? (Sludge, backwash water, brines, spent treatment media, etc.) FALSE 9. Does a flow sensing device prevent chemical injection when water flow stops? WASTE HANDLING and DISPOSAL (Explain disposal methods in comments) FALSE 4. Is water treatment plant waste properly disposed of? 3. Were all alarms associated with treatment process equipment properly addressed? (Review treatment equipment alarm log(s) with the operator.) FALSE yes no n/a unk note SAMPLE TAPS FALSE 6. Are sampling taps provided for each treatment process? CHEMICAL APPLICATION If no chemical applied, questions 6-24 are n/a yes no n/a unk note FALSE 7. Are chemical feeders in good condition with spare parts readily available for 5. Do any treatment processes, emergency overflow, drainage, or pump to waste features discharge to surface water or conveyances that have potential critical pump components? Page Sources Treated by Facility: (Tag Date Online: Facility Name: Facility ID Physical Location: Identify all processes in the treatment train: FALSE FALSE 14th and Albion 1989 Process Objectives: 403 Chemical Trade Name: FALSE 8. Are the feeders manually or automatically controlled? Manual Automatic Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Unk Unk Lime-Soda Ash Sedimentation Filtration Peroxide POU Coagulation Ion Exchange Sequestration pH adjustment Yes No Unk Disinfection Aeration Flocculation Inhibitor Fluoridation Permanganate Other: Sludge Treatment Backwash GAC PAC Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Treatment Application Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) TRUE Page 4 Of 26 (Emergency Kit for 150 lb. cylinders and Emergancy Kit for ton containers) ID5160008 3. Is a bottle of ammonium hydroxide provided? (56% ammonia solution) 4. Is a Chlorine Institute leak repair kit provided? TRUE TRUE GAS CHLORINATION yes no n/a unk note PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FALSE 18. Are cylinders protected from overly hot and cold temperatures? chlorinator room? TRUE 14. Does the chlorine room door open outward by using a crash bar? FALSE 2. Does respiratory protection equipment consist of >30 minutes of air and similar to the units used by the local fire department? FALSE 5. Is automatic chlorine gas leak detection equipment provided? CHLORINE LEAK DETECTION yes no n/a unk note 6. See photos 2-10 3. None provided. 4. No kit available. 6. No audible alarm. 12. Air intake is near the outlet 14. No crash bar 21. No ammonia storage. FALSE TRUE 6. Is the automatic leak detector equipped with both an audible alarm and a FALSE 8. Is a sealed and separate room provided for gas chlorination equipment? 17. Are any floor drains in the chlorine room sealed during normal operations FALSE 23. Are cylinders on a calibrated, working scale? CHLORINE GAS CYLINDERS (Applies to both full and empty cylinders) TRUE 13. Does the ventilation fan discharge to outside areas that may be occupied? (Walkways, sitting areas, etc.) FALSE 16. Is an interior shatter resistant inspection window provided? 15. Do pressurized chlorine feed lines carry chlorine gas beyond the FALSE 19. Are cylinders isolated from operating areas? TRUE and not connected to any other drainage systems? FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE 22. Are cylinders stored out of direct sunlight or heat sources? FALSE 20. Are cylinders restrained by a chain or cable to prevent tipping? FALSE 21. Are cylinders stored in rooms separately from ammonia storage? FALSE 24. Is an automatic switch-over of chlorine cylinders provided? (Recommended) 25. Are at least 2 people present during cylinder changes? (Recommended) FALSE DO NOT ENTER THE GAS CHLORINE ROOM UNTIL YOU ARE SURE THE AIR HANDLING SYSTEM IS OPERATING PROPERLY. THE OPERATOR MUST ACTIVATE THE VENTILATION SYSTEM PRIOR TO ENTERING. FALSE 11. Is a working ventilating fan provided? TRUE 12. Is the room vented at the floor with a ceiling air inlet across the room? FALSE 9. Are separate fan and light vandal-proof switches provided outside of the room and at the inspection window? FALSE 10. Are danger signs posted on all chlorine room doors and buildings? Facility Name: of the chlorine room? Notes: warning light? (Please indicate question number) Treated Water (GPD): Gas System Type: Facility ID E0007520TP 1. Is respiratory protection equipment available and stored nearby, but outside Well #2 TP Note: The "Chlorination" module must also be filled out for each Treatment Plant (TP) that utilizes gas chlorination. Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) that has gas. 3/1/2022 7. Does each chlorine cylinder have a valve that automatically shuts off the flow of chlorine gas, or is there an air treatment system for the chlorine room that automatically turns on, if a chlorine leak is detected? FALSE yes no n/a unk note CHLORINE ROOM Unk Pressure Vacuum IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Gas Chlorination Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) w/source: w/source: 3550 FALSE 257 FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE 3. Are pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers applied to the well lot without approval? [PHONE REDACTED] gallons psi. 5 Of 26 WELL SOURCE Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each well associated to the PWS 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Tag Source Name: Associated with: Is this Well Source Treated? D0037120 Well #7 Treatment Processes: Physical Location: (Explain the Treatment Train in Notes) On Hiland Ave, north of HWY 30 421 - disinfection without filtration Source Activity Status: (Choice One) Source Availability: (Choice One) Latitude (Decimal): 42.539363 Pump Capacity (GPM): Start-up (MM/DD): Static Water Depth (FT): Shut Down (MM/DD): Longitude (Decimal): -113.78295 Is there a well log for the source? EDMS 2017ACA2134 Readings at the time of inspection: Is this source seasonal? WELL INFORMATION Notes: FALSE 1. Are surrounding land uses creating health hazards or increasing the (Please indicate question number) potential for source contamination? (Setbacks not met, dumping, etc.) 4. Well not in a pit. FALSE 2. Are toxic or hazardous chemicals stored on the well lot? FALSE 5. Is the well (not located in a pump house) protected from unauthorized access? (Locking cap, fenced, etc.) (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the well protected from flooding? (pesticides, paint, herbicides, fertilizers, petroleum, etc.) FALSE FALSE 4. If the well is in a pit, is the pit protected from flooding and contamination? (watertight walls and floor, floor drain, acceptable pit cover, etc.) FALSE 8. Does the well casing and cap prevent contamination and surface water entry? FALSE 9. Is a raw water smooth nosed sample tap provided on the discharge pipe? (Prior to any treatment) (casing height >highest flood level, >18" outdoor, >12" indoor, etc.) FALSE 7. Is the well properly vented? (24 mesh screen, open downward >18" outdoor or >12" indoor, etc.) (Instant, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 12. Is an adequate pump-to-waste provided? (Capacity of the well, air gap, prior to the first service connection, etc.) FALSE 10. Is a working flow meter provided? (Instant, totaling, nonvolatile memory, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 11. Is a working pressure gauge provided? FALSE 15. Is the pump house protected from unauthorized entry? (Locked, durable construction, etc.) FALSE 16. Does the pump house have adequate lighting throughout? yes no n/a unk note PUMP HOUSE (Only pump houses that contain a Groundwater Source) 13. Is the well enclosed in a pump house? FALSE 14. Is the pump house protected from contamination? (Clean, in good repair, etc.) corrosion? (Inadequate ventilation) FALSE 19. Is there a history of pump house equipment freezing? (Inadequate heating) FALSE 20. Is the pump house protected from flooding and surface water entry? FALSE 17. Is adequate backflow protection provided on all threaded taps installed in the pump house? FALSE 18. Are there signs of equipment damage due to excess heat, moisture, or Page (Floor drain, ground surface graded to lead surface water away, etc.) FALSE 21. Does the configuration of the floor drain or sump cause a contamination risk? (connected to other drainage systems, sump <30' from well, etc.) Active Proposed Emergency Inactive Yes No Wellfield No Yes N/A Unk Unk Manifold Deficiency Significant Verified as accurate Verified as accurate N/A Yes Seasonal Unk No Permanent Interim Other IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Well Source Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) Treated Water (GPD): TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 6 Of 26 TREATMENT APPLICATION & CONTROL Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) associated to the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Well house #7 location D0037120 2007 Identify all processes in the treatment train: Facility Name: Facility ID Well 7 TP D0037120TP Physical Location: Sources Treated by Facility: (Tag Date Online: FALSE Constant Chlor plus Arch Chemicals FALSE yes no n/a unk note TREATMENT Notes: Process Objectives: Chemical Trade Name: Chemical Manufacturer: ANSI/NSF 60 certified? 421 FALSE yes no n/a unk note (Review treatment equipment alarm log(s) with the operator.) WASTE HANDLING and DISPOSAL FALSE 4. Is water treatment plant waste properly disposed of? (Sludge, backwash water, brines, spent treatment media, etc.) 1. Is water treatment required for public health protection? (Please indicate question number) (MCL exceedances, surface water treatment, pathogens, etc.) 4. No waste generated. 13, 16 - 24. Single chemical used. No solution tanks. 2. Have there been any interruptions in treatment in the past year? FALSE 3. Were all alarms associated with treatment process equipment properly addressed? FALSE 6. Are sampling taps provided for each treatment process? yes no n/a unk note CHEMICAL APPLICATION If no chemical applied, questions 6-24 are n/a FALSE 7. Are chemical feeders in good condition with spare parts readily available for (Explain disposal methods in comments) FALSE 5. Do any treatment processes, emergency overflow, drainage, or pump to waste yes no n/a unk note features discharge to surface water or conveyances that have potential connection to surface water? SAMPLE TAPS FALSE 9. Does a flow sensing device prevent chemical injection when water flow stops? FALSE 10. If water flow rates vary, are chemical feed rates proportional to flow? FALSE 11. Are the quantities of chemicals used measured to detect over or under dosing? critical pump components? 8. Are the feeders manually or automatically controlled? chemical solutions from being siphoned or overfed into the water supply? FALSE 14. Is the chemical feed equipment easily accessible? FALSE 15. Is space provided for storage and handling of chemicals? (Recommended) FALSE 12. Is backflow prevention provided on the water lines that discharge to solution tanks? (Air gap, internal feeder protection, etc.) FALSE 13. Is a working anti-siphon valve or equivalent on each feeder to prevent liquid FALSE 18. Are chemical solution tanks protected from contamination? (Covered, sealed, etc.) FALSE 19. Are liquid chemical solution tanks provided with an overflow that is protected from contamination? (Open downward, 24 mesh screen, air gap, etc.) FALSE 16. Are incompatible chemicals stored and handled separately? FALSE 17. Where multiple chemicals are used, are tanks and pipes clearly labeled to prevent accidental cross contamination? FALSE 22. Are chemical shipping containers clearly labeled? (Chemical name, purity, concentration, supplier, ANSI/NSF 60 certified, etc.) FALSE 23. Are acids and caustics kept in closed, corrosion-resistant containers? FALSE 20. Are floors smooth, impervious, slip-proof, and well drained? (Recommended) FALSE 21. Are vents from corrosive or hazardous chemical equipment discharged to the outside atmosphere above grade and remote from air intakes? (Gloves, respirator, protective clothing, goggles or face mask, etc.) FALSE 26. Where provided, is the shower and eyewash station working? Page FALSE 24. Is secondary spill containment provided for all bulk liquid chemical containers? (110% of container volume) FALSE 25. Is personal protective equipment provided for each operator? Manual Automatic Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Unk Unk Lime-Soda Ash Sedimentation Filtration Peroxide POU Coagulation Ion Exchange Sequestration pH adjustment Yes No Unk Disinfection Aeration Flocculation Inhibitor Fluoridation Permanganate Other: Sludge Treatment Backwash GAC PAC Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Treatment Application Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) TRUE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 7 Of 26 A separate form must be completed for each chlorinator in the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Note: The "Treatment Application" module must also be completed for each facility that chlorinates. CHLORINATION Survey Date PWS # Facility Name: Facility ID Treated Water (GPD): Well #7 TP D0037120TP Select types used: Required or Voluntary Disinfection: Entry Point Residual: Disinfection Point: 1. Does the system maintain continuous disinfection? (Please indicate question number) mg/L Time Collected: Chlorination Purpose: Abundance of caution yes no n/a unk note CHLORINATION Notes: FALSE 6. Are chlorine storage tanks covered, sealed, and vented outside? FALSE 2. If water flow rate varies, is an automatic proportioning chlorinator being used? 5. No petroleum products. 6. No tanks. 10-15. Disinfection not required. FALSE 3. Is an EPA approved method used to measure the residual disinfectant concentration? FALSE 4. Is the equipment for measuring the residual disinfectant in good condition? (Reagents not expired, equipment calibrated, color wheel not faded, etc.) FALSE 5. Are all petroleum products stored separate from chlorine? (The reaction between these products is quick and violent) yes no n/a unk note REQUIRED DISINFECTION FALSE 7. Was the residual observed at a service connection? If yes: mg/L Location: Time: VOLUNTARY CHLORINATION FALSE 8. Is detectable free chlorine residual maintained throughout the distribution system? FALSE 9. Is the free chlorine residual measured daily at the entry point? (Recommended) immediately of the contact basin? FALSE 10. Are there areas of the distribution system that are not currently monitored, and may lack adequate residual? FALSE 11. Is a backup chemical feed pump provided to ensure continuous disinfection? FALSE 12. Is contact time being calculated correctly? (Reporting correct temp, pH, flow, residual; etc.) FALSE 13. For determining contact time, is chlorine residual, temperature, and pH measured Page FALSE 14. Are EPA approved methods used to measure pH and temperature? (Calibrated pH meter and thermometer, no litmus paper) FALSE 15. Is the contact time basin protected from contamination? Gas cl2 Hypochlorination Hypochlorite - onsite generation Unk VOL = Voluntary Disinfection REQ2 = Required Disinfection without contact time REQ1 = Required Disinfection that includes contact time (4-log) Digital Colorimeter Test Strips Color Wheel A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Pre-filtration Post-filtration Disinfection only Deficiency Significant Deficiency Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Chlorination Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- FALSE Date in Service: FALSE FALSE Date Last Inspected: TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE Reason: FALSE FALSE Page 8 Of 26 STORAGE Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each storage unit in the PWS. 3/1/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) ID5160008 Physical Location: Total Days Supply (This structure) : Hiland Ave, near Well #7 2007 1 Date Last Cleaned: Storage Structure Name: Storage Structure ID Volume (gal): Storage tank 7 ID5160008ST7 2 million How is the water level measured? Was the entire storage structure safely accessible for inspection? transducer no fall protection yes no n/a unk note ALL STORAGE STRUCTURES Notes: Storage Type: Construction: Type of Material: FALSE 1. Does the storage structure appear to be structurally sound? (Please indicate question number) FALSE 2. Is leakage evident at time of inspection? 14. There was debris noted inside the overflow screen possibly indicating that interior coating may be corroding. 17 & 18. Tank is above- ground. FALSE 3. Can the storage structure be isolated from the system without depressurizing the distribution system? (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the storage structure protected from contamination? (Watertight roof and sidewalls; excludes birds, animals, insects, and excessive dust; sloped roof to facilitate drainage; etc.) FALSE 4. Does a contamination risk exist due to wastewater spray irrigation or sludge disposal within 500 feet of the storage structure? FALSE 5. Is vegetation managed to prevent impact to the storage structure? around the tank? (Discharge to daylight over drainage structure or splash plate, screened, adequate air gap, etc.) FALSE 9. Is an overflow provided and protected from contamination? (Discharges to daylight, air gap, 24 mesh screen or expanded metal screen with weighted flapper; etc.) FALSE 7. Is the storage structure secure from unauthorized access? (Fencing, locked manholes, etc.) FALSE 8. Does the drain discharge in a way to prevent contamination and erosion ( above the roof, 2" overlapping lid, watertight, sealed, etc.) FALSE 12. Are vents provided and protected from contamination? (open downward >12" above roof and >24" above ground; 24 mesh screen; exclude animals, insects, birds, and excessive dust; etc.) (The overflow pipe shall not be considered a vent) FALSE 10. Does the overflow discharge in a way to prevent backflow and erosion around the tank? (Drainage structure or splash plate, air gap, etc.) FALSE 11. Are access covers locked and protected from contamination? contamination risk? (Paint, coatings, sealants, components, etc. NSF 61 Approved) FALSE 16. Is the area surrounding the storage structure graded to prevent standing surface water? (n/a for elevated tanks) FALSE 13. Are there signs or a history of the storage appurtenances freezing? TRUE 14. Are metal surfaces inside the tank corroding? FALSE 15. Are there any materials or components contacting water that may pose a FALSE 18. Do potential contamination sources exist <50' from the storage structure? (Sewer/irrigation lines, standing water, etc.) yes no n/a unk note PARTIALLY BURIED OR BELOW-GROUND STORAGE FALSE 17. Are manholes elevated to prevent contamination from snow, storm water, etc.? (>24" above the roof or ground) Unk Unk Unk Unk Reservoir/Tank Elevated Plastic Fiberglass Concrete Metal Other: Unk Unk Above-ground Ground-level Below-ground Partially Buried Clearwell Standpipe Yes No Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Storage Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) w/source: w/source: 1050 FALSE 202 FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE 3. Are pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers applied to the well lot without approval? [PHONE REDACTED] gallons 75 psi. 9 Of 26 WELL SOURCE Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each well associated to the PWS 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Tag Source Name: Associated with: Is this Well Source Treated? E0007522 Well #4 Treatment Processes: Physical Location: (Explain the Treatment Train in Notes) On 4th North St, near the Miller Ave and 4th intersection 421-disinfection without filtration Source Activity Status: (Choice One) Source Availability: (Choice One) Latitude (Decimal): 42.560525 Pump Capacity (GPM): Start-up (MM/DD): Static Water Depth (FT): Shut Down (MM/DD): Longitude (Decimal): -113.794403 Is there a well log for the source? EDMS 2022ACA1198 Readings at the time of inspection: Is this source seasonal? WELL INFORMATION Notes: FALSE 1. Are surrounding land uses creating health hazards or increasing the (Please indicate question number) potential for source contamination? (Setbacks not met, dumping, etc.) 4. Well is not in a pit. FALSE 2. Are toxic or hazardous chemicals stored on the well lot? FALSE 5. Is the well (not located in a pump house) protected from unauthorized access? (Locking cap, fenced, etc.) (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the well protected from flooding? (pesticides, paint, herbicides, fertilizers, petroleum, etc.) FALSE FALSE 4. If the well is in a pit, is the pit protected from flooding and contamination? (watertight walls and floor, floor drain, acceptable pit cover, etc.) FALSE 8. Does the well casing and cap prevent contamination and surface water entry? FALSE 9. Is a raw water smooth nosed sample tap provided on the discharge pipe? (Prior to any treatment) (casing height >highest flood level, >18" outdoor, >12" indoor, etc.) FALSE 7. Is the well properly vented? (24 mesh screen, open downward >18" outdoor or >12" indoor, etc.) (Instant, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 12. Is an adequate pump-to-waste provided? (Capacity of the well, air gap, prior to the first service connection, etc.) FALSE 10. Is a working flow meter provided? (Instant, totaling, nonvolatile memory, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 11. Is a working pressure gauge provided? FALSE 15. Is the pump house protected from unauthorized entry? (Locked, durable construction, etc.) FALSE 16. Does the pump house have adequate lighting throughout? yes no n/a unk note PUMP HOUSE (Only pump houses that contain a Groundwater Source) 13. Is the well enclosed in a pump house? FALSE 14. Is the pump house protected from contamination? (Clean, in good repair, etc.) corrosion? (Inadequate ventilation) FALSE 19. Is there a history of pump house equipment freezing? (Inadequate heating) FALSE 20. Is the pump house protected from flooding and surface water entry? FALSE 17. Is adequate backflow protection provided on all threaded taps installed in the pump house? FALSE 18. Are there signs of equipment damage due to excess heat, moisture, or Page (Floor drain, ground surface graded to lead surface water away, etc.) FALSE 21. Does the configuration of the floor drain or sump cause a contamination risk? (connected to other drainage systems, sump <30' from well, etc.) Active Proposed Emergency Inactive Yes No Wellfield No Yes N/A Unk Unk Manifold Deficiency Significant Verified as accurate Verified as accurate N/A Yes Seasonal Unk No Permanent Interim Other IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Well Source Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) Treated Water (GPD): TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 10 Of 26 TREATMENT APPLICATION & CONTROL Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) associated to the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Inside Well #4 pumphouse E0007522 1987 Identify all processes in the treatment train: Facility Name: Facility ID Well #4 TP E0007522TP Physical Location: Sources Treated by Facility: (Tag Date Online: FALSE Constant Chlor Plus Arch Chemicals FALSE yes no n/a unk note TREATMENT Notes: Process Objectives: Chemical Trade Name: Chemical Manufacturer: ANSI/NSF 60 certified? 421 FALSE yes no n/a unk note (Review treatment equipment alarm log(s) with the operator.) WASTE HANDLING and DISPOSAL FALSE 4. Is water treatment plant waste properly disposed of? (Sludge, backwash water, brines, spent treatment media, etc.) 1. Is water treatment required for public health protection? (Please indicate question number) (MCL exceedances, surface water treatment, pathogens, etc.) 4. No waste generated. 12, 13, 16 - 24. Single chemical used. No solution tanks. 2. Have there been any interruptions in treatment in the past year? FALSE 3. Were all alarms associated with treatment process equipment properly addressed? FALSE 6. Are sampling taps provided for each treatment process? yes no n/a unk note CHEMICAL APPLICATION If no chemical applied, questions 6-24 are n/a FALSE 7. Are chemical feeders in good condition with spare parts readily available for (Explain disposal methods in comments) FALSE 5. Do any treatment processes, emergency overflow, drainage, or pump to waste yes no n/a unk note features discharge to surface water or conveyances that have potential connection to surface water? SAMPLE TAPS FALSE 9. Does a flow sensing device prevent chemical injection when water flow stops? FALSE 10. If water flow rates vary, are chemical feed rates proportional to flow? FALSE 11. Are the quantities of chemicals used measured to detect over or under dosing? critical pump components? 8. Are the feeders manually or automatically controlled? chemical solutions from being siphoned or overfed into the water supply? FALSE 14. Is the chemical feed equipment easily accessible? FALSE 15. Is space provided for storage and handling of chemicals? (Recommended) FALSE 12. Is backflow prevention provided on the water lines that discharge to solution tanks? (Air gap, internal feeder protection, etc.) FALSE 13. Is a working anti-siphon valve or equivalent on each feeder to prevent liquid FALSE 18. Are chemical solution tanks protected from contamination? (Covered, sealed, etc.) FALSE 19. Are liquid chemical solution tanks provided with an overflow that is protected from contamination? (Open downward, 24 mesh screen, air gap, etc.) FALSE 16. Are incompatible chemicals stored and handled separately? FALSE 17. Where multiple chemicals are used, are tanks and pipes clearly labeled to prevent accidental cross contamination? FALSE 22. Are chemical shipping containers clearly labeled? (Chemical name, purity, concentration, supplier, ANSI/NSF 60 certified, etc.) FALSE 23. Are acids and caustics kept in closed, corrosion-resistant containers? FALSE 20. Are floors smooth, impervious, slip-proof, and well drained? (Recommended) FALSE 21. Are vents from corrosive or hazardous chemical equipment discharged to the outside atmosphere above grade and remote from air intakes? (Gloves, respirator, protective clothing, goggles or face mask, etc.) FALSE 26. Where provided, is the shower and eyewash station working? Page FALSE 24. Is secondary spill containment provided for all bulk liquid chemical containers? (110% of container volume) FALSE 25. Is personal protective equipment provided for each operator? Manual Automatic Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Unk Unk Lime-Soda Ash Sedimentation Filtration Peroxide POU Coagulation Ion Exchange Sequestration pH adjustment Yes No Unk Disinfection Aeration Flocculation Inhibitor Fluoridation Permanganate Other: Sludge Treatment Backwash GAC PAC Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Treatment Application Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) TRUE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 1 Of 26 abundance of caution Notes: yes no n/a unk note CHLORINATION Chlorination Purpose: mg/L Time Collected: (Please indicate question number) VOLUNTARY CHLORINATION REQUIRED DISINFECTION FALSE 1. Does the system maintain continuous disinfection? concentration? (Reagents not expired, equipment calibrated, color wheel not faded, etc.) FALSE 4. Is the equipment for measuring the residual disinfectant in good condition? 3. Is an EPA approved method used to measure the residual disinfectant FALSE 2. If water flow rate varies, is an automatic proportioning chlorinator being used? yes no n/a unk note FALSE Note: The "Treatment Application" module must also be completed for each facility that chlorinates. CHLORINATION PWS # 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Survey Date A separate form must be completed for each chlorinator in the PWS. FALSE 12. Is contact time being calculated correctly? (Reporting correct temp, pH, flow, residual; etc.) 15. Is the contact time basin protected from contamination? FALSE FALSE 14. Are EPA approved methods used to measure pH and temperature? FALSE 13. For determining contact time, is chlorine residual, temperature, and pH measured 5. No petroleum products. 6. No tanks. 10-15. Disinfection not required. FALSE 9. Is the free chlorine residual measured daily at the entry point? (Recommended) 11. Is a backup chemical feed pump provided to ensure continuous disinfection? Page (Calibrated pH meter and thermometer, no litmus paper) FALSE 5. Are all petroleum products stored separate from chlorine? (The reaction between these products is quick and violent) FALSE 6. Are chlorine storage tanks covered, sealed, and vented outside? 8. Is detectable free chlorine residual maintained throughout the distribution system? FALSE 7. Was the residual observed at a service connection? If yes: Time: FALSE mg/L Location: FALSE 10. Are there areas of the distribution system that are not currently monitored, and may lack adequate residual? immediately of the contact basin? Facility Name: Facility ID Required or Voluntary Disinfection: Entry Point Residual: Disinfection Point: Treated Water (GPD): Well #4 TP E0007522TP Select types used: Gas cl2 Hypochlorination Hypochlorite - onsite generation Unk VOL = Voluntary Disinfection REQ2 = Required Disinfection without contact time REQ1 = Required Disinfection that includes contact time (4-log) Digital Colorimeter Test Strips Color Wheel A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Pre-filtration Post-filtration Disinfection only Deficiency Significant Deficiency Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Chlorination Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- FALSE Date in Service: FALSE FALSE Date Last Inspected: TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE Reason: FALSE FALSE Page 12 Of 26 (Sewer/irrigation lines, standing water, etc.) storm water, etc.? (>24" above the roof or ground) PARTIALLY BURIED OR BELOW-GROUND STORAGE 16. Is the area surrounding the storage structure graded to prevent standing 17. Are manholes elevated to prevent contamination from snow, surface water? (n/a for elevated tanks) 15. Are there any materials or components contacting water that may pose a FALSE FALSE FALSE 18. Do potential contamination sources exist <50' from the storage structure? FALSE (Paint, coatings, sealants, components, etc. NSF 61 Approved) contamination risk? STORAGE A separate form must be completed for each storage unit in the PWS. (mm/dd/yyyy) 2. Small leak in tank near overflow, see photo 43. 17 & 18. Tank is above-ground. yes no n/a unk note Storage Structure Name: Storage Structure ID Physical Location: sludge disposal within 500 feet of the storage structure? depressurizing the distribution system? Total Days Supply (This structure) : 8. Does the drain discharge in a way to prevent contamination and erosion >1 ALL STORAGE STRUCTURES yes no n/a unk note screen with weighted flapper; etc.) 9. Is an overflow provided and protected from contamination? 2. Is leakage evident at time of inspection? FALSE 13. Are there signs or a history of the storage appurtenances freezing? ID5160008ST4 750000 On 4th North St, near the Miller Ave and 4th intersection 1987 FALSE Storage tank #4 (open downward >12" above roof and >24" above ground; 24 mesh screen; FALSE 7. Is the storage structure secure from unauthorized access? (Fencing, locked manholes, etc.) (Discharges to daylight, air gap, 24 mesh screen or expanded metal 10. Does the overflow discharge in a way to prevent backflow and erosion exclude animals, insects, birds, and excessive dust; etc.) FALSE 11. Are access covers locked and protected from contamination? ( above the roof, 2" overlapping lid, watertight, sealed, etc.) FALSE (The overflow pipe shall not be considered a vent) FALSE 14. Are metal surfaces inside the tank corroding? 12. Are vents provided and protected from contamination? FALSE 5. Is vegetation managed to prevent impact to the storage structure? excessive dust; sloped roof to facilitate drainage; etc.) Type of Material: Notes: (Please indicate question number) FALSE (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the storage structure protected from contamination? Was the entire storage structure safely accessible for inspection? How is the water level measured? (Watertight roof and sidewalls; excludes birds, animals, insects, and FALSE FALSE around the tank? (Discharge to daylight over drainage structure or splash plate, screened, adequate air gap, etc.) PWS # Survey Date 3/1/2022 Volume (gal): Date Last Cleaned: around the tank? (Drainage structure or splash plate, air gap, etc.) 1. Does the storage structure appear to be structurally sound? Storage Type: Construction: transducer FALSE TRUE FALSE 3. Can the storage structure be isolated from the system without no fall protection 4. Does a contamination risk exist due to wastewater spray irrigation or ID5160008 Unk Unk Unk Unk Reservoir/Tank Elevated Plastic Fiberglass Concrete Metal Other: Unk Unk Above-ground Ground-level Below-ground Partially Buried Clearwell Standpipe Yes No Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Storage Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) w/source: w/source: 2000 FALSE 288 FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE 3. Are pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers applied to the well lot without approval? [PHONE REDACTED] gallons 0 psi. 13 Of 26 WELL SOURCE Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each well associated to the PWS 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Tag Source Name: Associated with: Is this Well Source Treated? D0002353 Well #6 Treatment Processes: Physical Location: (Explain the Treatment Train in Notes) On Hiland, south of 100S 421-disinfection without filtration Source Activity Status: (Choice One) Source Availability: (Choice One) Latitude (Decimal): 42.513306 Pump Capacity (GPM): Start-up (MM/DD): Static Water Depth (FT): Shut Down (MM/DD): Longitude (Decimal): -113.782 Is there a well log for the source? EDMS 2022ACA1189 Readings at the time of inspection: Is this source seasonal? WELL INFORMATION Notes: FALSE 1. Are surrounding land uses creating health hazards or increasing the (Please indicate question number) potential for source contamination? (Setbacks not met, dumping, etc.) 4. Well is not in a pit. 11. Not pumping at time of inspection FALSE 2. Are toxic or hazardous chemicals stored on the well lot? FALSE 5. Is the well (not located in a pump house) protected from unauthorized access? (Locking cap, fenced, etc.) (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the well protected from flooding? (pesticides, paint, herbicides, fertilizers, petroleum, etc.) FALSE FALSE 4. If the well is in a pit, is the pit protected from flooding and contamination? (watertight walls and floor, floor drain, acceptable pit cover, etc.) FALSE 8. Does the well casing and cap prevent contamination and surface water entry? FALSE 9. Is a raw water smooth nosed sample tap provided on the discharge pipe? (Prior to any treatment) (casing height >highest flood level, >18" outdoor, >12" indoor, etc.) FALSE 7. Is the well properly vented? (24 mesh screen, open downward >18" outdoor or >12" indoor, etc.) (Instant, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 12. Is an adequate pump-to-waste provided? (Capacity of the well, air gap, prior to the first service connection, etc.) FALSE 10. Is a working flow meter provided? (Instant, totaling, nonvolatile memory, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 11. Is a working pressure gauge provided? FALSE 15. Is the pump house protected from unauthorized entry? (Locked, durable construction, etc.) FALSE 16. Does the pump house have adequate lighting throughout? yes no n/a unk note PUMP HOUSE (Only pump houses that contain a Groundwater Source) 13. Is the well enclosed in a pump house? FALSE 14. Is the pump house protected from contamination? (Clean, in good repair, etc.) corrosion? (Inadequate ventilation) FALSE 19. Is there a history of pump house equipment freezing? (Inadequate heating) FALSE 20. Is the pump house protected from flooding and surface water entry? FALSE 17. Is adequate backflow protection provided on all threaded taps installed in the pump house? FALSE 18. Are there signs of equipment damage due to excess heat, moisture, or Page (Floor drain, ground surface graded to lead surface water away, etc.) FALSE 21. Does the configuration of the floor drain or sump cause a contamination risk? (connected to other drainage systems, sump <30' from well, etc.) Active Proposed Emergency Inactive Yes No Wellfield No Yes N/A Unk Unk Manifold Deficiency Significant Verified as accurate Verified as accurate N/A Yes Seasonal Unk No Permanent Interim Other IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Well Source Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) Treated Water (GPD): TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 14 Of 26 TREATMENT APPLICATION & CONTROL Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) associated to the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 South os 100S on Hiland D0002353 1998 Identify all processes in the treatment train: Facility Name: Facility ID Well #6 TP D0002353TP Physical Location: Sources Treated by Facility: (Tag Date Online: FALSE Constant Chlor Plus Arch Chemicals FALSE yes no n/a unk note TREATMENT Notes: Process Objectives: Chemical Trade Name: Chemical Manufacturer: ANSI/NSF 60 certified? 421 FALSE yes no n/a unk note (Review treatment equipment alarm log(s) with the operator.) WASTE HANDLING and DISPOSAL FALSE 4. Is water treatment plant waste properly disposed of? (Sludge, backwash water, brines, spent treatment media, etc.) 1. Is water treatment required for public health protection? (Please indicate question number) (MCL exceedances, surface water treatment, pathogens, etc.) 4. No waste generated. 12, 13, 16 - 24. Single gas chemical used. No solution tanks. 2. Have there been any interruptions in treatment in the past year? FALSE 3. Were all alarms associated with treatment process equipment properly addressed? FALSE 6. Are sampling taps provided for each treatment process? yes no n/a unk note CHEMICAL APPLICATION If no chemical applied, questions 6-24 are n/a FALSE 7. Are chemical feeders in good condition with spare parts readily available for (Explain disposal methods in comments) FALSE 5. Do any treatment processes, emergency overflow, drainage, or pump to waste yes no n/a unk note features discharge to surface water or conveyances that have potential connection to surface water? SAMPLE TAPS FALSE 9. Does a flow sensing device prevent chemical injection when water flow stops? FALSE 10. If water flow rates vary, are chemical feed rates proportional to flow? FALSE 11. Are the quantities of chemicals used measured to detect over or under dosing? critical pump components? 8. Are the feeders manually or automatically controlled? chemical solutions from being siphoned or overfed into the water supply? FALSE 14. Is the chemical feed equipment easily accessible? FALSE 15. Is space provided for storage and handling of chemicals? (Recommended) FALSE 12. Is backflow prevention provided on the water lines that discharge to solution tanks? (Air gap, internal feeder protection, etc.) FALSE 13. Is a working anti-siphon valve or equivalent on each feeder to prevent liquid FALSE 18. Are chemical solution tanks protected from contamination? (Covered, sealed, etc.) FALSE 19. Are liquid chemical solution tanks provided with an overflow that is protected from contamination? (Open downward, 24 mesh screen, air gap, etc.) FALSE 16. Are incompatible chemicals stored and handled separately? FALSE 17. Where multiple chemicals are used, are tanks and pipes clearly labeled to prevent accidental cross contamination? FALSE 22. Are chemical shipping containers clearly labeled? (Chemical name, purity, concentration, supplier, ANSI/NSF 60 certified, etc.) FALSE 23. Are acids and caustics kept in closed, corrosion-resistant containers? FALSE 20. Are floors smooth, impervious, slip-proof, and well drained? (Recommended) FALSE 21. Are vents from corrosive or hazardous chemical equipment discharged to the outside atmosphere above grade and remote from air intakes? (Gloves, respirator, protective clothing, goggles or face mask, etc.) FALSE 26. Where provided, is the shower and eyewash station working? Page FALSE 24. Is secondary spill containment provided for all bulk liquid chemical containers? (110% of container volume) FALSE 25. Is personal protective equipment provided for each operator? Manual Automatic Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Unk Unk Lime-Soda Ash Sedimentation Filtration Peroxide POU Coagulation Ion Exchange Sequestration pH adjustment Yes No Unk Disinfection Aeration Flocculation Inhibitor Fluoridation Permanganate Other: Sludge Treatment Backwash GAC PAC Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Treatment Application Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) TRUE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 15 Of 26 A separate form must be completed for each chlorinator in the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Note: The "Treatment Application" module must also be completed for each facility that chlorinates. CHLORINATION Survey Date PWS # Facility Name: Facility ID Treated Water (GPD): Well #6 TP D0002353TP Select types used: Required or Voluntary Disinfection: Entry Point Residual: Disinfection Point: 1. Does the system maintain continuous disinfection? (Please indicate question number) mg/L Time Collected: Chlorination Purpose: Abundance of caution yes no n/a unk note CHLORINATION Notes: FALSE 6. Are chlorine storage tanks covered, sealed, and vented outside? FALSE 2. If water flow rate varies, is an automatic proportioning chlorinator being used? 5. No petroleum products. 6. No tanks. 10-15. Disinfection not required. FALSE 3. Is an EPA approved method used to measure the residual disinfectant concentration? FALSE 4. Is the equipment for measuring the residual disinfectant in good condition? (Reagents not expired, equipment calibrated, color wheel not faded, etc.) FALSE 5. Are all petroleum products stored separate from chlorine? (The reaction between these products is quick and violent) yes no n/a unk note REQUIRED DISINFECTION FALSE 7. Was the residual observed at a service connection? If yes: mg/L Location: Time: VOLUNTARY CHLORINATION FALSE 8. Is detectable free chlorine residual maintained throughout the distribution system? FALSE 9. Is the free chlorine residual measured daily at the entry point? (Recommended) immediately of the contact basin? FALSE 10. Are there areas of the distribution system that are not currently monitored, and may lack adequate residual? FALSE 11. Is a backup chemical feed pump provided to ensure continuous disinfection? FALSE 12. Is contact time being calculated correctly? (Reporting correct temp, pH, flow, residual; etc.) FALSE 13. For determining contact time, is chlorine residual, temperature, and pH measured Page FALSE 14. Are EPA approved methods used to measure pH and temperature? (Calibrated pH meter and thermometer, no litmus paper) FALSE 15. Is the contact time basin protected from contamination? Gas cl2 Hypochlorination Hypochlorite - onsite generation Unk VOL = Voluntary Disinfection REQ2 = Required Disinfection without contact time REQ1 = Required Disinfection that includes contact time (4-log) Digital Colorimeter Test Strips Color Wheel A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Pre-filtration Post-filtration Disinfection only Deficiency Significant Deficiency Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Chlorination Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) w/source: w/source: 2200 FALSE 267 FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE 3. Are pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers applied to the well lot without approval? [PHONE REDACTED] gallons psi. 16 Of 26 WELL SOURCE Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each well associated to the PWS 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Tag Source Name: Associated with: Is this Well Source Treated? E0007521 Well #5 Treatment Processes: Physical Location: (Explain the Treatment Train in Notes) West of Hiland, south of 100S 421-disinfection without filtration Source Activity Status: (Choice One) Source Availability: (Choice One) Latitude (Decimal): 42.511264 Pump Capacity (GPM): Start-up (MM/DD): Static Water Depth (FT): Shut Down (MM/DD): Longitude (Decimal): -113.787375 Is there a well log for the source? EDMS 2022ACA1192 Readings at the time of inspection: Is this source seasonal? WELL INFORMATION Notes: FALSE 1. Are surrounding land uses creating health hazards or increasing the (Please indicate question number) potential for source contamination? (Setbacks not met, dumping, etc.) 4. Well is not in a pit. 11. Well was offline at time of inspection. FALSE 2. Are toxic or hazardous chemicals stored on the well lot? FALSE 5. Is the well (not located in a pump house) protected from unauthorized access? (Locking cap, fenced, etc.) (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the well protected from flooding? (pesticides, paint, herbicides, fertilizers, petroleum, etc.) FALSE FALSE 4. If the well is in a pit, is the pit protected from flooding and contamination? (watertight walls and floor, floor drain, acceptable pit cover, etc.) FALSE 8. Does the well casing and cap prevent contamination and surface water entry? FALSE 9. Is a raw water smooth nosed sample tap provided on the discharge pipe? (Prior to any treatment) (casing height >highest flood level, >18" outdoor, >12" indoor, etc.) FALSE 7. Is the well properly vented? (24 mesh screen, open downward >18" outdoor or >12" indoor, etc.) (Instant, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 12. Is an adequate pump-to-waste provided? (Capacity of the well, air gap, prior to the first service connection, etc.) FALSE 10. Is a working flow meter provided? (Instant, totaling, nonvolatile memory, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 11. Is a working pressure gauge provided? FALSE 15. Is the pump house protected from unauthorized entry? (Locked, durable construction, etc.) FALSE 16. Does the pump house have adequate lighting throughout? yes no n/a unk note PUMP HOUSE (Only pump houses that contain a Groundwater Source) 13. Is the well enclosed in a pump house? FALSE 14. Is the pump house protected from contamination? (Clean, in good repair, etc.) corrosion? (Inadequate ventilation) FALSE 19. Is there a history of pump house equipment freezing? (Inadequate heating) FALSE 20. Is the pump house protected from flooding and surface water entry? FALSE 17. Is adequate backflow protection provided on all threaded taps installed in the pump house? FALSE 18. Are there signs of equipment damage due to excess heat, moisture, or Page (Floor drain, ground surface graded to lead surface water away, etc.) FALSE 21. Does the configuration of the floor drain or sump cause a contamination risk? (connected to other drainage systems, sump <30' from well, etc.) Active Proposed Emergency Inactive Yes No Wellfield No Yes N/A Unk Unk Manifold Deficiency Significant Verified as accurate Verified as accurate N/A Yes Seasonal Unk No Permanent Interim Other IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Well Source Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) Treated Water (GPD): TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 17 Of 26 TREATMENT APPLICATION & CONTROL Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) associated to the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 West of Hiland, south of 100S E0007521 Identify all processes in the treatment train: Facility Name: Facility ID Well #5 TP E0007521TP Physical Location: Sources Treated by Facility: (Tag Date Online: FALSE Constant Chlor Plus Arch Chemicals FALSE yes no n/a unk note TREATMENT Notes: Process Objectives: Chemical Trade Name: Chemical Manufacturer: ANSI/NSF 60 certified? 421 FALSE yes no n/a unk note (Review treatment equipment alarm log(s) with the operator.) WASTE HANDLING and DISPOSAL FALSE 4. Is water treatment plant waste properly disposed of? (Sludge, backwash water, brines, spent treatment media, etc.) 1. Is water treatment required for public health protection? (Please indicate question number) (MCL exceedances, surface water treatment, pathogens, etc.) 4. No waste generated. 12, 13, 16 - 24. Single gas chemical used. No solution tanks. 2. Have there been any interruptions in treatment in the past year? FALSE 3. Were all alarms associated with treatment process equipment properly addressed? FALSE 6. Are sampling taps provided for each treatment process? yes no n/a unk note CHEMICAL APPLICATION If no chemical applied, questions 6-24 are n/a FALSE 7. Are chemical feeders in good condition with spare parts readily available for (Explain disposal methods in comments) FALSE 5. Do any treatment processes, emergency overflow, drainage, or pump to waste yes no n/a unk note features discharge to surface water or conveyances that have potential connection to surface water? SAMPLE TAPS FALSE 9. Does a flow sensing device prevent chemical injection when water flow stops? FALSE 10. If water flow rates vary, are chemical feed rates proportional to flow? FALSE 11. Are the quantities of chemicals used measured to detect over or under dosing? critical pump components? 8. Are the feeders manually or automatically controlled? chemical solutions from being siphoned or overfed into the water supply? FALSE 14. Is the chemical feed equipment easily accessible? FALSE 15. Is space provided for storage and handling of chemicals? (Recommended) FALSE 12. Is backflow prevention provided on the water lines that discharge to solution tanks? (Air gap, internal feeder protection, etc.) FALSE 13. Is a working anti-siphon valve or equivalent on each feeder to prevent liquid FALSE 18. Are chemical solution tanks protected from contamination? (Covered, sealed, etc.) FALSE 19. Are liquid chemical solution tanks provided with an overflow that is protected from contamination? (Open downward, 24 mesh screen, air gap, etc.) FALSE 16. Are incompatible chemicals stored and handled separately? FALSE 17. Where multiple chemicals are used, are tanks and pipes clearly labeled to prevent accidental cross contamination? FALSE 22. Are chemical shipping containers clearly labeled? (Chemical name, purity, concentration, supplier, ANSI/NSF 60 certified, etc.) FALSE 23. Are acids and caustics kept in closed, corrosion-resistant containers? FALSE 20. Are floors smooth, impervious, slip-proof, and well drained? (Recommended) FALSE 21. Are vents from corrosive or hazardous chemical equipment discharged to the outside atmosphere above grade and remote from air intakes? (Gloves, respirator, protective clothing, goggles or face mask, etc.) FALSE 26. Where provided, is the shower and eyewash station working? Page FALSE 24. Is secondary spill containment provided for all bulk liquid chemical containers? (110% of container volume) FALSE 25. Is personal protective equipment provided for each operator? Manual Automatic Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Unk Unk Lime-Soda Ash Sedimentation Filtration Peroxide POU Coagulation Ion Exchange Sequestration pH adjustment Yes No Unk Disinfection Aeration Flocculation Inhibitor Fluoridation Permanganate Other: Sludge Treatment Backwash GAC PAC Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Treatment Application Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) TRUE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 18 Of 26 A separate form must be completed for each chlorinator in the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Note: The "Treatment Application" module must also be completed for each facility that chlorinates. CHLORINATION Survey Date PWS # Facility Name: Facility ID Treated Water (GPD): Well #5 TP E0007521TP Select types used: Required or Voluntary Disinfection: Entry Point Residual: Disinfection Point: 1. Does the system maintain continuous disinfection? (Please indicate question number) mg/L Time Collected: Chlorination Purpose: Abundance of caution yes no n/a unk note CHLORINATION Notes: FALSE 6. Are chlorine storage tanks covered, sealed, and vented outside? FALSE 2. If water flow rate varies, is an automatic proportioning chlorinator being used? 5. No petroleum products. 6. No tanks. 10-15. Disinfection not required. FALSE 3. Is an EPA approved method used to measure the residual disinfectant concentration? FALSE 4. Is the equipment for measuring the residual disinfectant in good condition? (Reagents not expired, equipment calibrated, color wheel not faded, etc.) FALSE 5. Are all petroleum products stored separate from chlorine? (The reaction between these products is quick and violent) yes no n/a unk note REQUIRED DISINFECTION FALSE 7. Was the residual observed at a service connection? If yes: mg/L Location: Time: VOLUNTARY CHLORINATION FALSE 8. Is detectable free chlorine residual maintained throughout the distribution system? FALSE 9. Is the free chlorine residual measured daily at the entry point? (Recommended) immediately of the contact basin? FALSE 10. Are there areas of the distribution system that are not currently monitored, and may lack adequate residual? FALSE 11. Is a backup chemical feed pump provided to ensure continuous disinfection? FALSE 12. Is contact time being calculated correctly? (Reporting correct temp, pH, flow, residual; etc.) FALSE 13. For determining contact time, is chlorine residual, temperature, and pH measured Page FALSE 14. Are EPA approved methods used to measure pH and temperature? (Calibrated pH meter and thermometer, no litmus paper) FALSE 15. Is the contact time basin protected from contamination? Gas cl2 Hypochlorination Hypochlorite - onsite generation Unk VOL = Voluntary Disinfection REQ2 = Required Disinfection without contact time REQ1 = Required Disinfection that includes contact time (4-log) Digital Colorimeter Test Strips Color Wheel A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Pre-filtration Post-filtration Disinfection only Deficiency Significant Deficiency Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Chlorination Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- FALSE Date in Service: FALSE FALSE Date Last Inspected: FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE Reason: FALSE FALSE Page 19 Of 26 STORAGE Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each storage unit in the PWS. 3/1/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) ID5160008 Physical Location: Total Days Supply (This structure) : West of Hiland, south of 100S 1978 1 Date Last Cleaned: 2021 2021 Storage Structure Name: Storage Structure ID Volume (gal): Storage Tank 5&6 ID5160008ST56 2 million How is the water level measured? Was the entire storage structure safely accessible for inspection? transducer Most of the tank is buried yes no n/a unk note ALL STORAGE STRUCTURES Notes: Storage Type: Construction: Type of Material: FALSE 1. Does the storage structure appear to be structurally sound? (Please indicate question number) FALSE 2. Is leakage evident at time of inspection? 14. Tank is not metal FALSE 3. Can the storage structure be isolated from the system without depressurizing the distribution system? (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the storage structure protected from contamination? (Watertight roof and sidewalls; excludes birds, animals, insects, and excessive dust; sloped roof to facilitate drainage; etc.) FALSE 4. Does a contamination risk exist due to wastewater spray irrigation or sludge disposal within 500 feet of the storage structure? FALSE 5. Is vegetation managed to prevent impact to the storage structure? around the tank? (Discharge to daylight over drainage structure or splash plate, screened, adequate air gap, etc.) FALSE 9. Is an overflow provided and protected from contamination? (Discharges to daylight, air gap, 24 mesh screen or expanded metal screen with weighted flapper; etc.) FALSE 7. Is the storage structure secure from unauthorized access? (Fencing, locked manholes, etc.) FALSE 8. Does the drain discharge in a way to prevent contamination and erosion ( above the roof, 2" overlapping lid, watertight, sealed, etc.) FALSE 12. Are vents provided and protected from contamination? (open downward >12" above roof and >24" above ground; 24 mesh screen; exclude animals, insects, birds, and excessive dust; etc.) (The overflow pipe shall not be considered a vent) FALSE 10. Does the overflow discharge in a way to prevent backflow and erosion around the tank? (Drainage structure or splash plate, air gap, etc.) FALSE 11. Are access covers locked and protected from contamination? contamination risk? (Paint, coatings, sealants, components, etc. NSF 61 Approved) FALSE 16. Is the area surrounding the storage structure graded to prevent standing surface water? (n/a for elevated tanks) FALSE 13. Are there signs or a history of the storage appurtenances freezing? FALSE 14. Are metal surfaces inside the tank corroding? FALSE 15. Are there any materials or components contacting water that may pose a FALSE 18. Do potential contamination sources exist <50' from the storage structure? (Sewer/irrigation lines, standing water, etc.) yes no n/a unk note PARTIALLY BURIED OR BELOW-GROUND STORAGE FALSE 17. Are manholes elevated to prevent contamination from snow, storm water, etc.? (>24" above the roof or ground) Unk Unk Unk Unk Reservoir/Tank Elevated Plastic Fiberglass Concrete Metal Other: Unk Unk Above-ground Ground-level Below-ground Partially Buried Clearwell Standpipe Yes No Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Storage Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) w/source: w/source: 2100 FALSE 226 FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE 3. Are pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers applied to the well lot without approval? 306435000 gallons 60 psi. 20 Of 26 WELL SOURCE Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each well associated to the PWS 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Tag Source Name: Associated with: Is this Well Source Treated? E0007519 Well #3 Treatment Processes: Physical Location: (Explain the Treatment Train in Notes) 2020 Park Ave 403 - disinfection without filtration Source Activity Status: (Choice One) Source Availability: (Choice One) Latitude (Decimal): 42.528769 Pump Capacity (GPM): Start-up (MM/DD): Static Water Depth (FT): Shut Down (MM/DD): Longitude (Decimal): -113.803711 Is there a well log for the source? EDMS 2022ACA1191 Readings at the time of inspection: Is this source seasonal? WELL INFORMATION Notes: FALSE 1. Are surrounding land uses creating health hazards or increasing the (Please indicate question number) potential for source contamination? (Setbacks not met, dumping, etc.) 4. Well is not in a pit FALSE 2. Are toxic or hazardous chemicals stored on the well lot? FALSE 5. Is the well (not located in a pump house) protected from unauthorized access? (Locking cap, fenced, etc.) (Recommended) FALSE 6. Is the well protected from flooding? (pesticides, paint, herbicides, fertilizers, petroleum, etc.) FALSE FALSE 4. If the well is in a pit, is the pit protected from flooding and contamination? (watertight walls and floor, floor drain, acceptable pit cover, etc.) FALSE 8. Does the well casing and cap prevent contamination and surface water entry? FALSE 9. Is a raw water smooth nosed sample tap provided on the discharge pipe? (Prior to any treatment) (casing height >highest flood level, >18" outdoor, >12" indoor, etc.) FALSE 7. Is the well properly vented? (24 mesh screen, open downward >18" outdoor or >12" indoor, etc.) (Instant, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 12. Is an adequate pump-to-waste provided? (Capacity of the well, air gap, prior to the first service connection, etc.) FALSE 10. Is a working flow meter provided? (Instant, totaling, nonvolatile memory, installed on discharge pipe, etc.) FALSE 11. Is a working pressure gauge provided? FALSE 15. Is the pump house protected from unauthorized entry? (Locked, durable construction, etc.) FALSE 16. Does the pump house have adequate lighting throughout? yes no n/a unk note PUMP HOUSE (Only pump houses that contain a Groundwater Source) 13. Is the well enclosed in a pump house? FALSE 14. Is the pump house protected from contamination? (Clean, in good repair, etc.) corrosion? (Inadequate ventilation) FALSE 19. Is there a history of pump house equipment freezing? (Inadequate heating) FALSE 20. Is the pump house protected from flooding and surface water entry? FALSE 17. Is adequate backflow protection provided on all threaded taps installed in the pump house? FALSE 18. Are there signs of equipment damage due to excess heat, moisture, or Page (Floor drain, ground surface graded to lead surface water away, etc.) FALSE 21. Does the configuration of the floor drain or sump cause a contamination risk? (connected to other drainage systems, sump <30' from well, etc.) Active Proposed Emergency Inactive Yes No Wellfield No Yes N/A Unk Unk Manifold Deficiency Significant Verified as accurate Verified as accurate N/A Yes Seasonal Unk No Permanent Interim Other IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Well Source Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) Treated Water (GPD): TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 21 Of 26 TREATMENT APPLICATION & CONTROL Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) associated to the PWS. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 2020 Park Ave E0007519 Identify all processes in the treatment train: Facility Name: Facility ID Well #3 TP E0007519TP Physical Location: Sources Treated by Facility: (Tag Date Online: FALSE chlorine FALSE yes no n/a unk note TREATMENT Notes: Process Objectives: Chemical Trade Name: Chemical Manufacturer: ANSI/NSF 60 certified? 403 FALSE yes no n/a unk note (Review treatment equipment alarm log(s) with the operator.) WASTE HANDLING and DISPOSAL FALSE 4. Is water treatment plant waste properly disposed of? (Sludge, backwash water, brines, spent treatment media, etc.) 1. Is water treatment required for public health protection? (Please indicate question number) (MCL exceedances, surface water treatment, pathogens, etc.) 4. No waste generated. 12, 13, 16 - 24. Single gas chemical used. No solution tanks. 2. Have there been any interruptions in treatment in the past year? FALSE 3. Were all alarms associated with treatment process equipment properly addressed? FALSE 6. Are sampling taps provided for each treatment process? yes no n/a unk note CHEMICAL APPLICATION If no chemical applied, questions 6-24 are n/a FALSE 7. Are chemical feeders in good condition with spare parts readily available for (Explain disposal methods in comments) FALSE 5. Do any treatment processes, emergency overflow, drainage, or pump to waste yes no n/a unk note features discharge to surface water or conveyances that have potential connection to surface water? SAMPLE TAPS FALSE 9. Does a flow sensing device prevent chemical injection when water flow stops? FALSE 10. If water flow rates vary, are chemical feed rates proportional to flow? FALSE 11. Are the quantities of chemicals used measured to detect over or under dosing? critical pump components? 8. Are the feeders manually or automatically controlled? chemical solutions from being siphoned or overfed into the water supply? FALSE 14. Is the chemical feed equipment easily accessible? FALSE 15. Is space provided for storage and handling of chemicals? (Recommended) FALSE 12. Is backflow prevention provided on the water lines that discharge to solution tanks? (Air gap, internal feeder protection, etc.) FALSE 13. Is a working anti-siphon valve or equivalent on each feeder to prevent liquid FALSE 18. Are chemical solution tanks protected from contamination? (Covered, sealed, etc.) FALSE 19. Are liquid chemical solution tanks provided with an overflow that is protected from contamination? (Open downward, 24 mesh screen, air gap, etc.) FALSE 16. Are incompatible chemicals stored and handled separately? FALSE 17. Where multiple chemicals are used, are tanks and pipes clearly labeled to prevent accidental cross contamination? FALSE 22. Are chemical shipping containers clearly labeled? (Chemical name, purity, concentration, supplier, ANSI/NSF 60 certified, etc.) FALSE 23. Are acids and caustics kept in closed, corrosion-resistant containers? FALSE 20. Are floors smooth, impervious, slip-proof, and well drained? (Recommended) FALSE 21. Are vents from corrosive or hazardous chemical equipment discharged to the outside atmosphere above grade and remote from air intakes? (Gloves, respirator, protective clothing, goggles or face mask, etc.) FALSE 26. Where provided, is the shower and eyewash station working? Page FALSE 24. Is secondary spill containment provided for all bulk liquid chemical containers? (110% of container volume) FALSE 25. Is personal protective equipment provided for each operator? Manual Automatic Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Unk Unk Lime-Soda Ash Sedimentation Filtration Peroxide POU Coagulation Ion Exchange Sequestration pH adjustment Yes No Unk Disinfection Aeration Flocculation Inhibitor Fluoridation Permanganate Other: Sludge Treatment Backwash GAC PAC Recommend Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Treatment Application Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) TRUE Page 22 Of 26 DO NOT ENTER THE GAS CHLORINE ROOM UNTIL YOU ARE SURE THE AIR HANDLING SYSTEM IS OPERATING PROPERLY. THE OPERATOR MUST ACTIVATE THE VENTILATION SYSTEM PRIOR TO ENTERING. Note: The "Chlorination" module must also be filled out for each Treatment Plant (TP) that utilizes gas chlorination. GAS CHLORINATION Survey Date PWS # A separate form must be completed for each Treatment Plant (TP) that has gas. 3/1/2022 ID5160008 Facility Name: Facility ID Gas System Type: Treated Water (GPD): Well #3 TP E0007519TP yes no n/a unk note PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Notes: (Emergency Kit for 150 lb. cylinders and Emergancy Kit for ton containers) FALSE 1. Is respiratory protection equipment available and stored nearby, but outside (Please indicate question number) of the chlorine room? See photos 62-65 for gas chlorination room 3, 4 & 6. Not provided 8. Room is not sealed, photo 63 & 65 shows observation window open 10. No signage 12. Air intake is the open window and does therefore not meet rule. 14. No crash bar 21. No ammonia storage. FALSE 2. Does respiratory protection equipment consist of >30 minutes of air and yes no n/a unk note similar to the units used by the local fire department? CHLORINE LEAK DETECTION TRUE 3. Is a bottle of ammonium hydroxide provided? (56% ammonia solution) TRUE 4. Is a Chlorine Institute leak repair kit provided? FALSE 5. Is automatic chlorine gas leak detection equipment provided? TRUE 6. Is the automatic leak detector equipped with both an audible alarm and a warning light? FALSE 7. Does each chlorine cylinder have a valve that automatically shuts off the flow yes no n/a unk note of chlorine gas, or is there an air treatment system for the chlorine room that automatically turns on, if a chlorine leak is detected? CHLORINE ROOM TRUE 8. Is a sealed and separate room provided for gas chlorination equipment? FALSE 9. Are separate fan and light vandal-proof switches provided outside of the room and at the inspection window? TRUE 10. Are danger signs posted on all chlorine room doors and buildings? FALSE 11. Is a working ventilating fan provided? TRUE 12. Is the room vented at the floor with a ceiling air inlet across the room? FALSE 13. Does the ventilation fan discharge to outside areas that may be occupied? (Walkways, sitting areas, etc.) TRUE 14. Does the chlorine room door open outward by using a crash bar? FALSE 15. Do pressurized chlorine feed lines carry chlorine gas beyond the chlorinator room? TRUE 16. Is an interior shatter resistant inspection window provided? FALSE 17. Are any floor drains in the chlorine room sealed during normal operations and not connected to any other drainage systems? yes no n/a unk note CHLORINE GAS CYLINDERS (Applies to both full and empty cylinders) FALSE 18. Are cylinders protected from overly hot and cold temperatures? FALSE 19. Are cylinders isolated from operating areas? FALSE 20. Are cylinders restrained by a chain or cable to prevent tipping? FALSE 21. Are cylinders stored in rooms separately from ammonia storage? FALSE 22. Are cylinders stored out of direct sunlight or heat sources? FALSE 23. Are cylinders on a calibrated, working scale? FALSE 24. Is an automatic switch-over of chlorine cylinders provided? (Recommended) FALSE 25. Are at least 2 people present during cylinder changes? (Recommended) Unk Pressure Vacuum IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Gas Chlorination Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- FALSE Main Line Sizes: FALSE 23 Of 26 8. Is there a water loss control program? (Recommended) 9. Is the owner/operator aware of any leaking water mains? 10. Is there a water efficiency program? (Recommended) 3. Was the pressure observed at a service connection? 12. Are dead end mains flushed at least semiannually? FALSE If yes: Location: Time: to unapproved source, uncontrolled fire hydrant use, treatment bypass with raw FALSE 15. Are there any connections that provide supplemental disinfection and meet the definition of a PWS but are unregulated? (Recommended) (Hospitals, businesses, long-term care facilities, etc.) (Community PWS only) (Authority to implement, inspection program, adequate failed device) FALSE TRUE yes no n/a unk note 24. Are bulk water stations provided with backflow protection measures? FALSE FALSE FALSE If yes, explain in comments section. (Pipes, sealants, components, etc.) 13. Are there any materials used that should not be in contact with drinking water? 20. Are all backflow preventers owned by the PWS tested annually? 21. Are there any known unprotected cross connections? 22. Are all non-potable mains, hydrants, and taps easily identified as such? Cross Connection Control FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 11. Are all dead end mains equipped with a means to flush? protection, annual testing,ability to discontinue service, 10 days to repair a water, etc.) (Prevent surface water entry and backflow, open downward, 24 mesh screen, etc.) ID5160008 yes no n/a unk note PWS # Survey Date 3/1/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) 2. Have public notifications, DEQ notifications, and follow-up actions been followed for any planned or unplanned depressurizations in the past year? Main Line Type of Materials: (Please indicate question number) 20. Devices in Wellhouse #7 were not FALSE DISTRIBUTION One form for all distribution systems in the PWS. (Submerged blow-offs, direct connections to storm or sewer drains, connection 19. Is the operator trained in cross connection control? (Recommended) # Fire Hydrants: 23. Is the discharge piping on all air valves protected from contamination? # Flushing Hydrants: 14. Does the system experience water main freezing? 18. Is an adequate cross connection control program provided and implemented? 7. Are valves inspected and exercised regularly? (Recommended) If yes, how often? 16. Are there any unused subsurface water storage tanks that need to be abandoned? (Recommended) 17. Are there any water supply wells that are no longer being used that 1. Is a current map of the distribution system available? (Recommended) (Main sizes, locations of valves and hydrants, etc.) (Including fire flow - Identify pressure complaints in the notes.) 0 cast iron Notes: 4. Is a minimum system pressure of 20 psi. maintained at all service connections? need to be abandoned? (Recommended) FALSE 6. Does pressure exceed 100 psi at any service connection? FALSE 5. Is a minimum system pressure of 40 psi. maintained during maximum hourly demand conditions? (PWSs constructed after 7/1/1985 - Excluding fire flow) psi. Page # Metered Connections: (Select all that apply) 1"-18" 3867 yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE out of DISTRIBUTION 3867 680 Unk Unk Steel PVC HDPE (black) Ductile Iron Asbestos/Cement A.M. P.M. Copper Other: Gray Iron Galvanized IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Distribution Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Survey Date 3/1/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) PUMPS, PUMP HOUSES, AND CONTROLS Pump ID#: Type of Pump: Horsepower: Low (psi) set point High (psi) set point 1 vertical turbine 200 40 65 2 vertical turbine 600 na na 3 vertical turbine 40 na na 4 vertical turbine 200 na na 5 vertical turbine 200 na na 6 vertical turbine 150 na na 7 vertical turbine 15, 25, 40, 150 na na 8 vertical turbine 250 na na 9 vertical turbine 250 na na 10 vertical turbine 40, 250 na na 11 vertical turbine 250 na na 12 vertical turbine 200 40 65 13 14 15 16 17 yes no n/a unk note Page 24 Of 26 One form for all Pumps. Physical Location: Well #2 Well #7 Storage 7 Booster 1 Storage 7 Booster 2 PWS # ID5160008 Purpose: to distribution to storage to distribution to distribution PUMPING - PG. 1 to distribution to storage to storage to distribution to distribution to distribution Well #4 Booster 1, 2 & 3 & fire to distribution to storage Well #6 Well #5 Storage #5 booster 1 & 2 Storage #5 booster #3 Well #3 (on the discharge side before the shut-off valve) 5. Are isolation valves provided on the discharge side of the pump? FALSE FALSE FALSE Storage 7 Booster 3 Well #4 FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 9. Is an air/vacuum relief valve provided for vertical turbine pump(s) and is it protected from contamination? (Open downward, 24 mesh screen, air gap, etc.) 8. Is all pump lubrication oil ANSI/NSF 61 approved? 1. Do pumps cycle < 6 times per hour? (Recommended) 3. Are spare parts readily available for critical pump components? PUMPS 4. Is each pump equipped with an accessible check valve? 2. Are all pumps in good repair? (excessive noise, vibration, heat, odors, leaks, etc.) Notes: (Please indicate question number) All pumps showing na for pressure settings are controlled by storage tank level demands. Additionally, I did not include pumps for dosing chlorine into the system. 10-18 All pumps are housed in wellhouses. FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 6. Is a working pressure gauge installed on the discharge line? PUMP HOUSE (Only pump houses that don't contain a Groundwater Source) 10. Is the pump house protected from contamination? (Clean, good repair, etc.) 11. Is the pump house protected from unauthorized entry? 7. Is a working flow meter provided? (Required if pump is connected directly to the distribution system) FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE 17. Does the floor drain discharge >30 feet from any well? 18. Does an unprotected cross connection exist due to the floor drain connection? (Connected to sewer, storm drains, etc.) (Locked, durable construction, etc.) 12. Does the pump house have adequate lighting throughout? 13. Is adequate backflow protection provided on all threaded taps/ hose bibs 14. Are there signs of excess heat, moisture, or corrosion damage? (Inadequate ventilation) 15. Are there signs or a history of pump house equipment freezing? (Inadequate heating) 16. Is the pump house protected from flooding and surface water entry? (Drained, ground surface graded to lead surface water away, etc.) installed in the pump house? IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Pumping Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- SURVEY DATE 3/1/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) APU ID#: Type of APU: Brand: Model: 1 diesel CAT D343A 2 diesel Onan 600DFX 3 diesel CAT 800W FALSE Page 25 Of 26 (Please indicate question number) yes no n/a unk note AUXILIARY POWER UNIT (APU) PWS # ID5160008 Physical Location: Well lot #4 20. Is a working automatic power transfer switch provided? FALSE Auxiliary Power Units (APU) Purpose: source and booster power source and booster power source and booster power PUMPING - PG. 2 One form for all auxiliary power units Well lot #5 COMMENTS: 19. Is the APU tested regularly? (Recommended) Well lot #7 FALSE FALSE the pumping station (pump, controls, treatment, etc.) and pressurize the APU on a Well Lot Only 23. Is the fuel tank above ground or otherwise accessible for leak inspection? 25. Does a certified operator observe filling of the fuel tank? Community Systems Only 21. Can the community PWS adequately pressurize the distribution system during a power outage? yes no n/a unk note 26. Is the engine exhaust directly discharged to the outside atmosphere? 22. Does the APU power all essential electrical functions in the pump house and 24. Is secondary spill containment provided for all fuel tanks? (110% of fuel tank volume) FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE system for a minimum of 8 hours? FALSE FALSE yes no n/a unk note Deficiency Significant IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Pumping Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- (mm/dd/yyyy) Fee: $ 26 Of 26 MANAGERIAL PLANS see note MANAGERIAL CAPACITY 8. Are samples being taken in accordance with the sample siting plan(s)? Change frequency to: waiver, variance, or exemption determinations-5yr; PNs issued-3yr; RECORDS MANAGEMENT 9. Are records retained onsite or nearby for the minimum time required? 10. Is there a customer complaint system and ongoing public information program? 7. Do all sample siting plan(s) meet the minimum requirements? FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE 14. Does the PWS have an Emergency Response Plan? (Community PWSs >3300) (TC-5yr; chem/rad-10yr; violation corrective actions-3yr; sanitary surveys-10yr; 5. Does the board meet routinely? Frequency: 4. Does this PWS have a governing body or board of directors? 11. Is there a recognized organizational structure and management of the PWS? FALSE (Recommended) Notes: 3. Has an independent financial audit of the PWS been conducted, or has the SMART Financial Tool been completed? (Recommended) (Please indicate question number) 2. Is the user charged for drinking water? Current RTCR schedule: 2.residential: $18.70 for first 3000 gallons then 0.54 per each additional 1000 gallons Commercial: $20.70 for first 5000 gallons then 0.76 per each additional 1000 gallons 6. Review the following where applicable: (Recommended) 12. Is there an overall operation and maintenance manual for the PWS? PWS # ID5160008 Survey Date 3/1/2022 FINANCIAL / MANAGERIAL One form for each survey. FALSE FALSE yes no n/a unk note FINANCIAL CAPACITY 1. Is the PWS current with the payment of drinking water fees? If no, identify why in the notes. yes no n/a unk note TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE yes no n/a unk note FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE Page daily free chlorine residuals-1yr) FALSE inadequately protected? 18. Are protocols followed for any confined space entry? (Recommended) 17. Is there a potential shock hazard because the electrical wiring appears to be OPERATOR SAFETY 15. Are all operators trained in safety procedures and equipment? 16. Does a safety concern exist for personnel and/or visitors? (PPE, handrails/ guardrails, ladders, non-slip treads, etc.) (including equipment manuals, as-builts, SOPs, manufacturers' literature, etc) 13. Does the PWS have an Asset Management Plan? (Recommended) yes no n/a unk note PWS Inventory Information Sample Schedules Chlorine Residual History - Past 5 years Sample History (TCR and Non-TCR) - Past 5 Years Violation History - Past 5 years Public Notification - ongoing/currently required Compliance Schedules - pending and overdue N/A RTCR PBCU DBP Special RTCR Monitoring Evaluation (CFR 141.854 Quarterly No Change Quarterly Operating Reports (MORs) Cross Connection Control Plan Sample Siting Plan(s) POU System Classification Worksheet (C & NTNC) IDEQ - Sanitary Survey - 1/1/20 Financial/ Managerial Capacity Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Photographic Documentation Inspection Date(s): Tuesday, March 01, 2022 Facility ID: ID5160008 Name of Facility: City of Burley Inspector(s): Cassandra Lemmons Purpose of Inspection: ESS State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 2 Table of Photographs: Photograph 1: Well #2 4 Photograph 2: Wellhouse #2 4 Photograph 3: Gas chlorine room door signage 5 Photograph 4: Gas chlorine room 5 Photograph 5: Gas chlorine room 6 Photograph 6: Gas chlorine tanks 6 Photograph 7: Gas chlorine injection point 7 Photograph 8: Gas chlorine room mixing pump 7 Photograph 9: Gas chlorine room warning 8 Photograph 10: Gas chlorine tanks - no wrench on valve 8 Photograph 11: Well #2 pumping room 9 Photograph 12: Well #2 vertical turbine pump motor 9 Photograph 13: Well #2 piping and flow control 10 Photograph 14: Pressure gauge 10 Photograph 15: Chlorine injection to distribution 11 Photograph 16: Well #7 and storage 11 Photograph 17: Wellhouse #7 and storage 12 Photograph 18: Well #7 APU 12 Photograph 19: Inside well 7 pumphouse 13 Photograph 20: Well #7 13 Photograph 21: Pump motor oil container 14 Photograph 22: Well 7 outlet 14 Photograph 23: Well 7 outlet piping to storage 15 Photograph 24: Well 7 flow meter 15 Photograph 25: Booster station for #7 storage structure 16 Photograph 26: Small leak at outlet to distribution 16 Photograph 27: Leak close-up 17 Photograph 28: Treatment plant 17 Photograph 29: Erosion feeder control 18 Photograph 30: Backflow for treatment 18 Photograph 31: Backflow for treatment 19 Photograph 32: Storage tank overflow - 19 Photograph 33: Well #4 and Storage #4 20 Photograph 34: Wellhouse #4 and Storage #4 20 Photograph 35: Well #4 21 Photograph 36: Well #4 21 Photograph 37: Pressure gauge 22 Photograph 38: Well #4 flow meter for storage 22 Photograph 39: Well #4 flow meter 23 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 3 Photograph 40: Storage#4 booster station 23 Photograph 41: Well #4 treatment plant 24 Photograph 42: Well #4 injection point 24 Photograph 43: Storage #4 25 Photograph 44: Well #4 APU 25 Photograph 45: Wells #5 (left with storage & 6 (upper 26 Photograph 46: Well lot #6 26 Photograph 47: Inside Well #6 wellhouse 27 Photograph 48: Well #6 outlet 27 Photograph 49: Well #6 outlet to storage #5 28 Photograph 50: Well #6 flow meter 28 Photograph 51: Well #6 treatment plant 29 Photograph 52: Well #6 treatment plant controls 29 Photograph 53: Well #5 treatment plant 30 Photograph 54: Inside Well #5 Well 30 Photograph 55: Well #5 pressure gauge 31 Photograph 56: Well #5 flow meter 31 Photograph 57: Storage #5 flow meter 32 Photograph 58: Well #5 APU 32 Photograph 59: APU fuel tank 33 Photograph 60: Storage #5 33 Photograph 61: Well #3 34 Photograph 62: Wellhouse (left) and treatment plant (right) 34 Photograph 63: Well #3 treatment plant 35 Photograph 64: Gas tanks 35 Photograph 65: Mixing pump 36 Photograph 66: Wellhouse #3 36 Photograph 67: Well #3 flow meter 37 Photograph 68: Well #3 pump motor 37 Photograph 69: Well #3 flow control and injection point 38 Photograph 70: Corrosion in piping 38 Photograph 71: Well #3 pressure gauge 39 Photograph 72: Well #3 outlet to distribution 39 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Photograph 1: Well #2 Photograph 2: Wellhouse #2 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 5 Photograph 3: Gas chlorine room door signage Photograph 4: Gas chlorine room Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 6 Photograph 5: Gas chlorine room Photograph 6: Gas chlorine tanks Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 7 Photograph 7: Gas chlorine injection point Photograph 8: Gas chlorine room mixing pump Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 8 Photograph 9: Gas chlorine room warning light, no audible alarm Photograph 10: Gas chlorine tanks - no wrench on valve Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 9 Photograph 11: Well #2 pumping room Photograph 12: Well #2 vertical turbine pump motor Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 10 Photograph 13: Well #2 piping and flow control Photograph 14: Pressure gauge Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 11 Photograph 15: Chlorine injection to distribution Photograph 16: Well #7 and storage Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 12 Photograph 17: Wellhouse #7 and storage Photograph 18: Well #7 APU Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 13 Photograph 19: Inside well 7 pumphouse Photograph 20: Well #7 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 14 Photograph 21: Pump motor oil container Photograph 22: Well 7 outlet piping Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 15 Photograph 23: Well 7 distribution piping Photograph 24: Well 7 flow meter Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 16 Photograph 25: Booster station for #7 storage structure Photograph 26: Small leak at outlet to distribution Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 17 Photograph 27: Leak close-up 43 Photograph 28: Well #7 Treatment plant Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 18 Photograph 29: Erosion feeder control Photograph 30: Backflow for treatment Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 19 Photograph 31: Backflow for treatment Photograph 32: Storage tank overflow – debris in screen Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 20 Photograph 33: Well #4 and Storage #4 Photograph 34: Wellhouse #4 and Storage #4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 21 Photograph 35: Well #4 Photograph 36: Well #4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 22 Photograph 37: Pressure gauge Photograph 38: Well #4 flow meter for storage Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 23 Photograph 39: Well #4 flow meter Photograph 40: Storage#4 booster station Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 24 Photograph 41: Well #4 treatment plant Photograph 42: Well #4 injection point Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 25 Photograph 43: Storage #4 leak Photograph 44: Well #4 APU Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 26 Photograph 45: Wells #5 (left with storage & 6 (upper right) Photograph 46: Well lot #6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 27 Photograph 47: Inside Well #6 wellhouse Photograph 48: Well #6 outlet piping Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 28 Photograph 49: Well #6 outlet to storage #5 Photograph 50: Well #6 flow meter Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 29 Photograph 51: Well #6 treatment plant Photograph 52: Well #6 treatment plant controls Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 30 Photograph 53: Well #5 treatment plant Photograph 54: Inside Well #5 Well house Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 31 Photograph 55: Well #5 pressure gauge Photograph 56: Well #5 flow meter Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 32 Photograph 57: Storage #5 flow meter Photograph 58: Well #5 APU Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 33 Photograph 59: APU fuel tank Photograph 60: Storage #5 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 34 Photograph 61: Well #3 Photograph 62: Wellhouse (left) and treatment plant (right) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 35 Photograph 63: Well #3 treatment plant – no warning light Photograph 64: Gas tanks – no valve wrenches Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 36 Photograph 65: Mixing pump Photograph 66: Wellhouse #3 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 37 Photograph 67: Well #3 flow meter Photograph 68: Well #3 pump motor Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 38 Photograph 69: Well #3 flow control and injection point Photograph 70: Corrosion in piping Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Photographic Documentation For: City of Burley - ID5160008 39 Photograph 71: Well #3 pressure gauge Photograph 72: Well #3 outlet to distribution Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX H Population Information Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Census Census Census Census Census Census Census Census Census 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Aberdeen 1,016 1,486 1,484 1,542 1,528 1,406 1,840 1,994 1,756 Acequia 107 107 100 106 144 124 131 Albion 357 610 415 229 286 305 262 267 234 American Falls 1,439 1,874 2,123 2,769 3,626 3,757 4,111 4,457 4,568 Ammon 363 447 1,882 2,545 4,669 5,002 6,187 13,816 17,694 Arco 548 961 1,562 1,244 1,241 1,016 1,026 995 879 Arimo 291 337 303 252 338 311 348 355 354 Ashton 1,203 1,256 1,242 1,187 1,219 1,114 1,129 1,127 949 Athol 120 226 214 190 312 346 676 692 709 Atomic City 141 24 34 25 25 29 41 Bancroft 406 495 416 366 505 393 382 377 299 Basalt 252 227 275 349 414 407 419 394 357 Bellevue 502 528 384 537 1,016 1,275 1,876 2,287 2,560 Blackfoot 3,681 5,180 7,378 8,716 10,065 9,646 10,419 11,899 12,346 Bliss 126 91 114 208 185 275 318 258 Bloomington 418 302 254 186 212 197 251 206 199 Boise City 26,130 34,393 34,481 74,990 102,249 125,738 185,787 205,671 235,684 Bonners Ferry 1,345 1,776 1,921 1,909 1,906 2,193 2,515 2,543 2,520 Bovill 447 437 357 343 289 256 305 260 191 Buhl 2,414 2,870 3,059 2,975 3,629 3,516 3,985 4,122 4,558 Burley 5,329 5,924 7,508 8,279 8,761 8,702 9,316 10,345 11,704 Butte City 104 42 93 59 76 74 78 Caldwell 7,272 10,487 12,230 14,219 17,699 18,400 25,967 46,237 59,996 Cambridge 405 354 473 383 428 374 360 328 335 Carey 427 513 604 685 Cascade 1,029 943 923 833 945 877 997 939 1,005 Castleford 274 174 191 179 277 226 215 Challis 620 728 732 784 758 1,073 909 1,081 902 Chubbuck 120 1,590 2,924 7,052 7,791 9,700 13,922 15,570 Clark Fork 430 387 452 367 449 448 530 536 513 Clayton 36 43 26 27 7 10 Clifton 268 201 150 137 208 228 213 259 413 Coeur d'Alene 10,049 12,198 14,291 16,228 19,913 24,563 34,514 44,137 54,628 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Population Dece Source: U,S, Census Burea 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Idaho 1,570,819 1,584,272 1,595,910 1,612,053 1,632,248 1,652,495 1,684,036 1,719,745 1,752,074 1,789,060 1,826,913 Aberdeen 1,998 2,000 1,975 1,969 1,951 1,934 1,933 1,945 1,941 1,976 1,992 Acequia 126 126 128 128 127 127 130 127 128 129 130 Albion 263 264 267 267 270 271 270 272 274 277 278 American Falls 4,480 4,420 4,444 4,411 4,372 4,341 4,317 4,278 4,308 4,297 4,298 Ammon 14,032 14,187 14,337 14,523 14,725 15,012 15,222 15,524 16,428 17,128 17,726 Arco 990 963 938 905 902 873 875 875 877 886 893 Arimo 350 355 354 354 355 359 363 361 364 364 368 Ashton 1,124 1,110 1,094 1,081 1,066 1,059 1,062 1,067 1,060 1,045 1,042 Athol 694 702 709 713 722 734 748 765 777 794 809 Atomic City 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 Bancroft 370 365 360 365 366 364 373 380 385 396 395 Basalt 395 397 393 393 392 391 393 398 402 407 411 Bellevue 2,325 2,298 2,292 2,309 2,319 2,331 2,374 2,401 2,433 2,450 2,501 Blackfoot 12,013 12,027 11,917 11,902 11,821 11,772 11,847 11,920 11,902 12,032 12,025 Bliss 316 312 310 308 305 306 307 306 305 305 312 Bloomington 205 204 206 208 206 203 206 210 208 209 209 Boise City 209,586 212,685 215,722 217,457 219,602 221,060 224,839 227,882 228,608 229,142 229,776 Bonners Ferry 2,511 2,458 2,448 2,439 2,453 2,514 2,584 2,627 2,626 2,651 2,693 Bovill 253 255 255 254 254 255 260 263 260 260 261 Buhl 4,184 4,205 4,230 4,280 4,308 4,346 4,394 4,444 4,448 4,510 4,524 Burley 10,331 10,318 10,354 10,363 10,373 10,336 10,381 10,438 10,477 10,596 10,712 Butte City 74 72 70 68 69 66 66 67 68 68 69 Caldwell 46,545 47,286 47,726 48,988 50,152 51,571 53,157 54,783 56,551 58,635 60,674 Cambridge 325 322 319 315 315 314 317 316 316 316 320 Carey 608 599 600 610 616 618 627 633 639 642 649 Cascade 931 916 905 911 926 945 975 989 1,006 1,032 1,053 Castleford 226 229 229 234 237 240 244 246 249 250 251 Challis 1,093 1,092 1,095 1,071 1,048 1,029 1,037 1,049 1,068 1,078 1,066 Chubbuck 14,026 14,147 14,179 14,184 14,284 14,504 14,728 14,952 15,267 15,599 15,960 Clark Fork 530 529 522 522 531 536 544 558 567 579 589 Clayton 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 8 8 8 Clifton 258 270 271 275 279 278 291 294 301 305 312 Coeur d'Alene 44,288 45,021 45,539 46,281 47,674 48,819 49,861 50,666 51,222 52,392 53,354 Cottonwood 909 922 934 931 926 928 924 932 936 958 977 Council 835 835 818 811 815 816 824 864 881 888 924 Craigmont 504 502 505 504 504 500 506 506 493 488 487 Crouch 165 166 161 160 161 166 168 176 183 187 192 Culdesac 380 381 380 385 385 384 384 384 385 384 384 Dalton Gardens 2,340 2,356 2,356 2,355 2,356 2,367 2,375 2,394 2,404 2,409 2,423 Dayton 463 463 462 462 466 468 480 479 483 495 504 Deary 508 515 517 515 515 518 525 530 525 524 531 Declo 346 348 352 351 357 358 356 359 360 366 369 Dietrich 332 326 337 341 340 338 336 343 342 338 341 Donnelly 143 140 139 139 141 143 149 151 214 219 229 Dover 546 544 537 538 591 642 708 740 798 876 968 Downey 626 628 629 624 619 620 621 624 631 633 634 Driggs 1,619 1,616 1,608 1,650 1,652 1,694 1,758 1,789 1,785 1,803 1,836 Drummond 16 16 16 15 17 16 15 17 16 16 16 Dubois 677 659 611 606 614 611 599 607 584 579 589 Eagle 20,012 20,514 21,076 21,685 22,517 23,629 24,817 26,091 28,284 29,826 31,699 East Hope 209 208 206 206 209 211 214 219 222 227 231 Eden 407 408 407 409 411 414 420 422 427 433 428 Elk River 124 124 123 122 121 121 122 122 123 122 123 Emmett 6,545 6,536 6,504 6,475 6,515 6,539 6,642 6,811 6,893 7,077 7,269 Fairfield 415 414 400 384 388 392 396 398 397 391 403 Ferdinand 159 161 160 158 159 159 158 160 160 162 164 Fernan Lake Village 173 174 174 174 174 174 175 176 175 175 174 Filer 2,522 2,546 2,568 2,611 2,655 2,689 2,743 2,789 2,858 2,935 2,939 Firth 480 483 479 477 477 476 478 486 489 498 501 Franklin 664 715 734 742 755 785 815 818 829 838 857 Fruitland 4,768 4,767 4,817 4,838 5,024 5,155 5,155 5,250 5,376 5,441 5,568 Garden City 10,984 11,148 11,287 11,368 11,502 11,665 11,762 11,882 11,882 11,979 11,920 Genesee 945 953 958 954 953 955 970 979 969 968 976 Georgetown 491 490 483 485 485 483 492 496 492 496 497 Glenns Ferry 1,325 1,275 1,277 1,270 1,265 1,244 1,254 1,281 1,296 1,298 1,295 Gooding 3,600 3,569 3,539 3,506 3,480 3,498 3,485 3,477 3,466 3,476 3,543 Grace 921 906 897 902 906 895 913 925 928 942 942 Annual Population Estimates Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 2020 2021 Aberdeen city, Idaho 1,766 1,768 1,797 Acequia city, Idaho 131 131 133 Albion city, Idaho 236 236 242 American Falls city, Idaho 4,558 4,560 4,610 Ammon city, Idaho 17,729 17,870 18,673 Arco city, Idaho 882 882 908 Arimo city, Idaho 354 354 351 Ashton city, Idaho 950 947 952 Athol city, Idaho 705 709 724 Atomic City city, Idaho 40 40 41 Bancroft city, Idaho 297 297 303 Basalt city, Idaho 359 358 365 Bellevue city, Idaho 2,542 2,549 2,568 Blackfoot city, Idaho 12,237 12,228 12,332 Bliss city, Idaho 259 259 259 Bloomington city, Idaho 200 199 206 Boise City city, Idaho 235,670 235,829 237,446 Bonners Ferry city, Idaho 2,493 2,498 2,561 Bovill city, Idaho 189 190 192 Buhl city, Idaho 4,568 4,566 4,654 Burley city, Idaho 11,638 11,661 11,863 Butte City city, Idaho 79 79 81 Caldwell city, Idaho 59,985 60,482 63,629 Cambridge city, Idaho 336 337 347 Carey city, Idaho 691 691 691 Cascade city, Idaho 971 976 993 Castleford city, Idaho 218 217 219 Challis city, Idaho 900 897 922 Chubbuck city, Idaho 15,641 15,715 15,842 Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 Geographic Area Population Estimate (as of July 1) April 1, 2020 Estimates Base Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 Clark Fork city, Idaho 517 519 540 Clayton city, Idaho 9 9 9 Clifton city, Idaho 416 420 428 Coeur d'Alene city, Idaho 54,515 54,770 55,904 Cottonwood city, Idaho 817 820 847 Council city, Idaho 859 867 908 Craigmont city, Idaho 472 472 493 Crouch city, Idaho 154 154 163 Culdesac city, Idaho 417 416 418 Dalton Gardens city, Idaho 2,539 2,542 2,556 Dayton city, Idaho 514 518 526 Deary city, Idaho 509 512 518 Declo city, Idaho 341 340 348 Dietrich city, Idaho 284 284 293 Donnelly city, Idaho 251 254 260 Dover city, Idaho 757 777 917 Downey city, Idaho 565 565 562 Driggs city, Idaho 1,973 1,981 2,139 Drummond city, Idaho 14 14 14 Dubois city, Idaho 513 515 514 Eagle city, Idaho 30,471 30,917 32,100 East Hope city, Idaho 230 231 239 Eden city, Idaho 396 394 397 Elk River city, Idaho 140 140 141 Emmett city, Idaho 7,585 7,635 7,819 Fairfield city, Idaho 441 445 463 Ferdinand city, Idaho 132 132 136 Fernan Lake Village city, Idaho 167 167 167 Filer city, Idaho 2,763 2,761 2,824 Firth city, Idaho 521 523 530 Franklin city, Idaho 1,025 1,029 1,062 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 Fruitland city, Idaho 6,068 6,105 6,454 Garden City city, Idaho 12,313 12,297 12,288 Genesee city, Idaho 1,029 1,029 1,044 Georgetown city, Idaho 504 506 513 Glenns Ferry city, Idaho 1,298 1,296 1,295 Gooding city, Idaho 3,676 3,685 3,713 Grace city, Idaho 929 929 938 Grand View city, Idaho 440 441 458 Grangeville city, Idaho 3,322 3,325 3,431 Greenleaf city, Idaho 813 811 814 Hagerman city, Idaho 968 973 981 Hailey city, Idaho 9,118 9,148 9,463 Hamer city, Idaho 85 85 88 Hansen city, Idaho 1,098 1,098 1,105 Harrison city, Idaho 228 228 229 Hauser city, Idaho 764 765 770 Hayden city, Idaho 15,556 15,630 16,194 Hayden Lake city, Idaho 653 655 662 Hazelton city, Idaho 809 807 813 Heyburn city, Idaho 3,693 3,700 3,692 Hollister city, Idaho 243 245 256 Homedale city, Idaho 2,875 2,900 2,996 Hope city, Idaho 96 97 100 Horseshoe Bend city, Idaho 716 721 818 Huetter city, Idaho 98 98 100 Idaho City city, Idaho 463 465 484 Idaho Falls city, Idaho 65,413 65,657 66,898 Inkom city, Idaho 795 798 809 Iona city, Idaho 2,723 2,746 2,885 Irwin city, Idaho 259 259 273 Island Park city, Idaho 193 193 193 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 Jerome city, Idaho 12,312 12,309 12,555 Juliaetta city, Idaho 622 622 632 Kamiah city, Idaho 1,147 1,146 1,204 Kellogg city, Idaho 2,306 2,307 2,374 Kendrick city, Idaho 288 288 291 Ketchum city, Idaho 3,561 3,570 3,588 Kimberly city, Idaho 4,612 4,631 4,824 Kooskia city, Idaho 511 511 527 Kootenai city, Idaho 941 953 1,002 Kuna city, Idaho 24,131 24,553 26,673 Lapwai city, Idaho 1,167 1,169 1,185 Lava Hot Springs city, Idaho 357 357 369 Leadore city, Idaho 92 93 94 Lewiston city, Idaho 34,193 34,185 34,447 Lewisville city, Idaho 417 417 426 McCall city, Idaho 3,650 3,688 3,844 McCammon city, Idaho 832 831 824 Mackay city, Idaho 453 452 473 Malad City city, Idaho 2,299 2,289 2,303 Malta city, Idaho 166 166 169 Marsing city, Idaho 1,226 1,232 1,263 Melba city, Idaho 575 573 581 Menan city, Idaho 715 714 723 Meridian city, Idaho 118,099 119,729 125,963 Middleton city, Idaho 9,426 9,535 10,169 Midvale city, Idaho 195 195 204 Minidoka city, Idaho 87 87 89 Montpelier city, Idaho 2,625 2,619 2,669 Moore city, Idaho 162 162 168 Moscow city, Idaho 25,414 25,466 25,850 Mountain Home city, Idaho 16,107 16,114 16,235 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 Moyie Springs city, Idaho 828 834 874 Mud Lake city, Idaho 316 319 330 Mullan city, Idaho 648 648 666 Murtaugh city, Idaho 116 116 122 Nampa city, Idaho 100,252 101,124 106,186 Newdale city, Idaho 333 332 331 New Meadows city, Idaho 517 522 546 New Plymouth city, Idaho 1,502 1,517 1,535 Nezperce city, Idaho 462 461 487 Notus city, Idaho 609 607 610 Oakley city, Idaho 788 790 804 Oldtown city, Idaho 222 223 235 Onaway city, Idaho 198 198 202 Orofino city, Idaho 3,239 3,240 3,275 Osburn city, Idaho 1,576 1,581 1,625 Oxford city, Idaho 36 36 38 Paris city, Idaho 545 543 553 Parker city, Idaho 302 301 301 Parma city, Idaho 2,095 2,092 2,114 Paul city, Idaho 1,195 1,198 1,441 Payette city, Idaho 8,116 8,180 8,415 Peck city, Idaho 165 165 168 Pierce city, Idaho 465 466 472 Pinehurst city, Idaho 1,674 1,676 1,729 Placerville city, Idaho 45 45 46 Plummer city, Idaho 1,016 1,019 1,048 Pocatello city, Idaho 56,238 56,282 57,092 Ponderay city, Idaho 1,299 1,307 1,470 Post Falls city, Idaho 38,538 39,209 42,610 Potlatch city, Idaho 765 766 774 Preston city, Idaho 5,586 5,614 5,771 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 Priest River city, Idaho 1,669 1,677 1,742 Rathdrum city, Idaho 9,223 9,290 10,223 Reubens city, Idaho 45 45 47 Rexburg city, Idaho 34,931 34,894 35,300 Richfield city, Idaho 429 429 442 Rigby city, Idaho 5,032 5,060 5,241 Riggins city, Idaho 372 373 383 Ririe city, Idaho 663 665 694 Roberts city, Idaho 503 503 539 Rockland city, Idaho 240 240 241 Rupert city, Idaho 6,075 6,091 6,099 St. Anthony city, Idaho 3,689 3,696 3,752 St. Charles city, Idaho 164 163 172 St. Maries city, Idaho 2,351 2,358 2,423 Salmon city, Idaho 3,119 3,108 3,190 Sandpoint city, Idaho 8,527 8,596 9,003 Shelley city, Idaho 4,796 4,840 5,032 Shoshone city, Idaho 1,642 1,641 1,678 Smelterville city, Idaho 672 672 691 Soda Springs city, Idaho 3,099 3,090 3,118 Spencer city, Idaho 29 29 29 Spirit Lake city, Idaho 2,344 2,351 2,462 Stanley city, Idaho 120 119 122 Star city, Idaho 11,187 11,363 12,912 State Line city, Idaho 37 37 39 Stites city, Idaho 172 173 177 Sugar City city, Idaho 2,343 2,358 2,616 Sun Valley city, Idaho 1,798 1,800 1,814 Swan Valley city, Idaho 226 240 254 Tensed city, Idaho 86 86 90 Teton city, Idaho 791 794 806 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 Tetonia city, Idaho 309 310 311 Troy city, Idaho 892 893 906 Twin Falls city, Idaho 51,593 51,816 53,213 Ucon city, Idaho 1,163 1,164 1,216 Victor city, Idaho 2,158 2,174 2,236 Wallace city, Idaho 786 786 808 Wardner city, Idaho 193 193 198 Warm River city, Idaho 1 1 1 Weippe city, Idaho 401 402 405 Weiser city, Idaho 5,616 5,639 5,810 Wendell city, Idaho 2,903 2,912 2,926 Weston city, Idaho 511 514 529 White Bird city, Idaho 85 85 88 Wilder city, Idaho 1,599 1,594 1,656 Winchester city, Idaho 282 281 295 Worley city, Idaho 255 254 255 Suggested Citation: Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places in Idaho: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021 (SUB-IP-EST2021-POP-16) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division Release Date: May 2022 Note: The estimates are based on the 2020 Census and reflect changes to the April 1, 2020 population due to geographic program revisions and the application of disclosure avoidance to protect confidentiality (DRB clearance number For population estimates methodology statements, see http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical- documentation/methodology.html. All geographic boundaries for the Vintage 2021 subcounty population estimates series are as of January 1, 2021. For updates on Legal Boundary Change/Annexation Data, see Additional information on these localities can be found in the Geographic Boundary Change Notes (see Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK---          $          ,-./[PHONE REDACTED] 072147 8-9.: ;<7=1>7/?3@7 AB.7= C7.:7= D-9E7F-4G/H5I7 J Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX I Cross Connection Ordinance Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX J Storage Analysis Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Existing Storage Analysis Year 2022 2042 ADD (gpm) 2,685 3,616 MDD (gpm) 6,372 8,582 Operational Storage 0.63 0.63 Peaking Storage 0.26 0.35 Fire Storage2 1.08 1.08 Emergency Storage3 1.29 1.74 Total Storage Required 3.25 3.79 Total Storage Available 4.13 4.13 Storage Surplus / Deficit 0.87 0.34 Storage Analysis (all values in MG)1 1. ADD = average day demand; MDD = maximum day demand; MG = million gallons; MGD = million gallons per day 2. Assumes 4500 gpm for 4 hours 3. Assumes 8 hours of ADD Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 UPZ Storage Analysis Year 2042 ADD (gpm) 136 MDD (gpm) 322 Operational Storage2 0.05 Peaking Storage3 0.07 Fire Storage4 0.84 Emergency Storage5 0.07 Total Storage Required 1.02 Total Storage Available 0 Storage Surplus / Deficit (1.02) Storage Analysis (all values in MG)1 1. ADD = average day demand; MDD = maximum day demand; MG = million gallons; MGD = million gallons per day 4. Assumes 3500 gpm for 4 hours 5. Assumes 8 hours of ADD 2. Assumes 10% of MDD for operational storage 3. Assumes 15% of MDD for peaking storage Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 2022 Peaking Storage Hour System Peaking Factor System MDD (gpm) Hourly Demand (gpm) Required Storage Outflow (gpm) Storage Inflow (gpm) Required Storage (gal) Storage Filling (gal) Peaking Storage (gal) Peaking Storage Factor 0 0.96 6,372 6,133 0 239 0 14,315 0 0.00 1 1.01 6,372 6,411 39 0 2,368 0 2,368 0.01 2 0.97 6,372 6,195 0 177 0 10,647 0 0.00 3 0.99 6,372 6,287 0 85 0 5,105 0 0.00 4 0.97 6,372 6,195 0 177 0 10,626 0 0.00 5 1.02 6,372 6,483 111 0 6,636 0 6,636 0.02 6 1.05 6,372 6,695 323 0 19,409 0 26,045 0.05 7 1.09 6,372 6,940 568 0 34,109 0 60,154 0.09 8 1.20 6,372 7,645 1,273 0 76,379 0 136,532 0.20 9 1.05 6,372 6,691 319 0 19,116 0 155,648 0.05 10 1.03 6,372 6,586 214 0 12,858 0 168,506 0.03 11 1.02 6,372 6,509 137 0 8,194 0 176,700 0.02 12 1.01 6,372 6,442 70 0 4,224 0 180,924 0.01 13 1.02 6,372 6,474 102 0 6,140 0 187,064 0.02 14 1.00 6,372 6,400 28 0 1,691 0 188,754 0.00 15 0.97 6,372 6,208 0 164 0 9,814 178,941 0.00 16 0.98 6,372 6,266 0 106 0 6,367 172,573 0.00 17 1.00 6,372 6,372 0 0 0 0 172,573 0.00 18 1.03 6,372 6,563 191 0 11,470 0 184,043 0.03 19 1.05 6,372 6,691 319 0 19,116 0 203,159 0.05 20 1.14 6,372 7,289 917 0 55,026 0 258,185 0.14 21 0.99 6,372 6,294 0 78 0 4,655 253,530 0.00 22 1.00 6,372 6,351 0 21 0 1,238 252,291 0.00 23 0.97 6,372 6,181 0 191 0 11,450 240,842 0.00 Average 1.02 6,372 6,513 192 52 - - - 0.03 Total - - - - - 276,733 74,217 258,185 - Year 2022 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Peaking Factor Time (hour) Peaking Storage Peaking Storage Diurnal Curve MDD 5500 6500 7500 8500 GPM Time (hour) Peaking Storage Peaking Storage Diurnal Curve MDD Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 2042 Peaking Storage Hour System Peaking Factor System MDD (gpm) Hourly Demand (gpm) Required Storage Outflow (gpm) Storage Inflow (gpm) Required Storage (gal) Storage Filling (gal) Peaking Storage (gal) Peaking Storage Factor 0 0.96 8,582 8,261 0 321 0 19,280 0 0.00 1 1.01 8,582 8,635 53 0 3,189 0 3,189 0.01 2 0.97 8,582 8,343 0 239 0 14,340 0 0.00 3 0.99 8,582 8,467 0 115 0 6,875 0 0.00 4 0.97 8,582 8,343 0 239 0 14,312 0 0.00 5 1.02 8,582 8,731 149 0 8,937 0 8,937 0.02 6 1.05 8,582 9,018 436 0 26,141 0 35,078 0.05 7 1.09 8,582 9,348 766 0 45,939 0 81,017 0.09 8 1.20 8,582 10,296 1,714 0 102,869 0 183,886 0.20 9 1.05 8,582 9,011 429 0 25,746 0 209,632 0.05 10 1.03 8,582 8,871 289 0 17,317 0 226,949 0.03 11 1.02 8,582 8,766 184 0 11,036 0 237,985 0.02 12 1.01 8,582 8,677 95 0 5,689 0 243,674 0.01 13 1.02 8,582 8,720 138 0 8,270 0 251,943 0.02 14 1.00 8,582 8,620 38 0 2,277 0 254,220 0.00 15 0.97 8,582 8,362 0 220 0 13,217 241,003 0.00 16 0.98 8,582 8,439 0 143 0 8,576 232,427 0.00 17 1.00 8,582 8,582 0 0 0 0 232,427 0.00 18 1.03 8,582 8,839 257 0 15,448 0 247,875 0.03 19 1.05 8,582 9,011 429 0 25,746 0 273,621 0.05 20 1.14 8,582 9,817 1,235 0 74,110 0 347,731 0.14 21 0.99 8,582 8,478 0 104 0 6,269 341,461 0.00 22 1.00 8,582 8,554 0 28 0 1,668 339,793 0.00 23 0.97 8,582 8,325 0 257 0 15,421 324,373 0.00 Average 1.02 8,582 8,771 259 69 - - - 0.03 Total - - - - - 372,713 99,958 347,731 - Year 2042 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX K Alternate Cost Estimates Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 General Line Item Roadway Quantity Alleyway Quantity Units Unit Price Roadway Cost (2025 Dollars) Alleyway Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Fittings, Hydrants, and Valves 1,760 1,760 LF 160 $ 281,600 $ 281,600 $ Connect to Existing Water Main - 8-inch Tapping Saddle and Valve 2 2 EA 8,500 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ Asphalt Surface Repair - 12-foot Width 1,760 80 LF 125 $ 220,000 $ 10,000 $ Gravel Surface Repair 0 1,680 LF 20 $ - $ 33,600 $ Utility Protection (road) 1,760 0 LF 7 $ 12,320 $ - $ Utility Protection (alley) 0 1,760 LF 11 $ - $ 19,360 $ New Service off Alley - 1" line, Meter, and Box 0 48 EA 5,000 $ - $ 240,000 $ New Service off Road - 1" line, Meter, Box, Curb/Gutter, Sidewalk, Landscaping, Fence Restoration, and Connection to Back of House 48 0 EA 14,000 $ 672,000 $ - $ 1,203,000 $ 601,600 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% 120,300 $ 60,200 $ 1,323,300 $ 661,800 $ Contingency 30% 397,000 $ 198,600 $ 1,720,300 $ 860,400 $ Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% 258,100 $ 129,100 $ 1,978,400 $ 989,500 $ Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% 494,600 $ 247,375 $ 2,473,000 $ 1,236,875 $ 1,236,125 $ 703 $ 85,555 60,200,000 $ Plans and Contract Documents Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Total Construction Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Total Project Cost Difference Total Project Cost Difference per Linear Foot (rounded) Length of Waterline in Allies (LF) Total Budget Implication (rounded) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: New Watco Transmission Line, Tank, and Booster Project Identifier: Alternative 1 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Abandon Existing Well 1 LS 15,000 $ 15,000 $ Demo Existing Tank and Well Facility 1 LS 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 6-inch PVC Transmission Pipe - Excavation, Bedding, Backfill, Fittings, and Valves 10,550 LF 140 $ 1,477,000 $ 1.25 MG Concrete Pre-Stressed Tank 1 LS 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ Booster Station (4,700 gpm) 1 LS 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ Site Work (Yard Piping, Overflow Pond, Grading, and Paving) 1 LS 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 18-inch PVC Transmission Pipe - Excavation, Bedding, Backfill, Fitting, and Valves 1,250 LF 310 $ 387,500 $ Boring (30" Casing) 250 LF 2,000 $ 500,000 $ Utility Protection 11,800 LF 7 $ 82,600 $ Gravel Surface Restoration 8,960 LF 21 $ 188,200 $ Asphalt Surface Restoration - Full Lane 850 LF 115 $ 97,800 $ Highway Asphalt Restoration - Full Lane 1,590 LF 150 $ 238,500 $ 8,136,600 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $814,000 $8,950,600 Contingency 30% $2,685,000 $11,635,600 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $1,745,000 $13,380,600 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $3,345,000 $ 16,726,000 Subtotal Location: Watco Site Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • The Watco Tank has reached the end of its useful life, and the Watco system needs a new tank and delivery system. The Watco Tank has insufficient fire storage. Objective: • Provide supply, delivery, and storage for the Watco system. Design Considerations: • The new tank and booster will be located across Highway 30 on a parcel owned by the City. A 6-inch PVC transmission line will fill the new 1.25 MG pre-stressed concrete tank via the existing City distribution system. The tank material should be reassessed during the conceptual design phase. The booster station must meet low flow conditions (15 gpm) and maximum day demands with fire flow (4,700 gpm). To serve the Watco system, boring will likely be required for the Highway 30 and the railroad crossing. The tank costs includes the foundation, tank, site work (overflow pond), yard piping, and electrical. The cost of the booster station includes the building, site work, yard piping, mechanical piping, electrical, HVAC, pump, motor, chlorination, generator, and controls. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: New Watco Pump, Tank, and Booster Station Project Identifier: Alternative 2 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Demo Existing Tank and Well Facility 1 LS 300,000 $ 300,000 $ Well Facility (500 gpm) 2 LS 1,500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 8-inch PVC Transmission Pipe - Excavation, Bedding, Backfill, Fittings, and Valves 2,250 LF 160 $ 360,000 $ Boring (18" Casing) 250 LF 1,500 $ 375,000 $ 1.25 MG Concrete Pre-Stressed Tank 1 LS 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ Booster Station (4,700 gpm) 1 LS 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ Site Work (Yard Piping, Overflow Pond, Grading, and Paving) 1 LS 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 18-inch PVC Transmission Pipe - Excavation, Bedding, Backfill, Fitting, and Valves 1,250 LF 310 $ 387,500 $ Boring (30" Casing) 250 LF 2,000 $ 500,000 $ Utility Protection 4,000 LF 7 $ 28,000 $ Asphalt Surface Restoration - Full Lane 850 LF 115 $ 97,800 $ 9,898,300 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $990,000 $10,888,300 Contingency 30% $3,266,000 $14,154,300 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $2,123,000 $16,277,300 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $4,069,000 $ 20,347,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Watco Site Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • The Watco Tank has reached the end of its useful life, and the Watco system needs a new tank and delivery system. Objective: • Provide supply, delivery, and storage demands for the Watco system. Design Considerations: • The new tank and booster will be located across Highway 30 on a parcel owned by the City. The existing well is set to be upgraded with new well facility to fill the 1.25 MG pre-stressed concrete tank. The tank material and the well upgrade should be reassessed during the conceptual design phase. The booster station must meet low flow conditions (15 gpm) and maximum day demands with fire flow (4,700 gpm). To serve the Watco system, boring will likely be required for the Highway 30 and the railroad crossing. The tank costs includes the foundation, tank, site work (overflow pond), yard piping, and electrical. The cost of the booster station includes the building, site work, yard piping, mechanical piping, electrical, HVAC, The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX L UPZ Supply Memo from Brockway Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Burley Well Location Analysis 2 Brockway Engineering PLLC / July 17, 2025 Table 1. Regulatory setbacks that may be applicable to new well development. DEQ (IDAPA 58.01.08) Property line 50 ft Gravity wastewater line 50 ft Any potential source of contamination 50 ft Pressure wastewater line 100 ft Individual home septic tank 100 ft Individual home disposal field 100 ft Livestock 50 ft Surface water (see text) IDWR (IDAPA 37.03.09) Other well, separate ownership 25 ft Septic drainfield 100 ft Septic tank 50 ft Sewer line – pressurized 100 ft Sewer line – gravity 50 ft Sewer line – secondary 25 ft Effluent pipe 50 ft Property line 5 ft Permanent buildings other than related to well 10 ft Above-ground chemical storage 20 ft Permanent (more than six months) or intermittent (more than two months) surface water 50 ft Canals, irrigation ditches or laterals, and other temporary (less than two months) surface water 25 ft C. Potential surface water influence The presence of the nearby canal will require special evaluation by DEQ in the approval of a well site. In compliance with the Surface Water Treatment Rule, DEQ has adopted guidelines by which existing and new public drinking water well sources must be evaluated and determined either to be “groundwater” or potentially “groundwater under the direct influence” of surface water. This evaluation is called a GWUDI analysis. The provisions in this guidance document pertaining to new sources, as opposed to existing sources, will apply in this case. Surface water is defined in the GWUDI guidance as “Any water that is open to the atmosphere, other than a sealed vessel such as a water storage tank, including lakes, streams, ponds, canals, and ditches, which exists for 60 or more days per year. The sixty days do not have to be continuous.” The H Canal along the southern border of the subject property meets this definition. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Burley Well Location Analysis 3 Brockway Engineering PLLC / July 17, 2025 A well source is defined as GWUDI if it exhibits significant occurrence of certain micro- or macro-organisms, or exhibits fluctuations in water chemistry or physical parameters that correlate with fluctuations in the nearby surface water. DEQ has considerable latitude to evaluate GWUDI criteria, but in general new sources located greater than 500 feet from surface water will be classified as “groundwater” without any further evaluation. Sources located less than 500 feet from surface water will require some level of evaluation, with those less than 200 feet likely requiring microscopic particular analysis (MPA) testing prior to bringing the well online. For new sources, DEQ strongly recommends placing the well as far away from surface water as possible and would likely expect that the 500-foot threshold to be met in this case. Since it appears that ample space is available, adhering to the 500-foot setback is recommended. DEQ expects that new well sources will be properly designed and constructed to exclude surface water to the extent feasible given the hydrogeological characteristics of the aquifer. This means placing the intake and annular seal depth to the lowest reasonable production zone, preferably below a low-permeability strata that provides protection against vertical migration of surface water to the intake zone. D. Hydrogeologic analysis D.1. Well drilling records Drilling records for wells within 0.75 miles of the subject property were obtained from the IDWR database and reviewed (Figure 1; Appendix All but one of these well is a domestic well and nearly all wells are completed in the uppermost alluvial aquifer with typical depths of 80 to 100 feet. This finding confirms the presence of the perched aquifer system that underlies the Burley and Rupert area from which most domestic wells draw. A limited number of wells, shown on Figure 1, extend below the uppermost zone and can provide information about the lithology closer to the production zones of the new City wells. The logs for the existing City wells were also consulted, as these are the deepest wells in the area although some are relatively distant from the site. The lithology in the wells on Figure 1 is very consistent, indicating a perching clay layer with a mean thickness of 44 feet, underlain by basalt at typically 90 to 120 feet and extending to about 230 feet (see Table This upper basalt layer may or may not contain water, and is not recommended to be developed as a production zone. Below the upper basalt a second alluvial layer consisting of sand, gravel, and clay exists from 230 to 304 feet (average). Below that layer is the production zone consisting of deep fractured basalts that likely extend to 700 feet or more based on consistent information from all of the City’s deep municipal wells. This lower basalt is the zone tapped by the City wells. Logs for wells that are fully cased to the lower basalt indicate that the piezometric head in that zone is higher than the top of the zone by 30 to 40 feet. Thus, water is present under confined conditions and is under a mild artesian pressure. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Burley Well Location Analysis 4 Brockway Engineering PLLC / July 17, 2025 D.2. Aquifer hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity of the basalt production zone was estimated based on pumping test information report for large wells with sufficient data to conduct the analysis. Five wells were identified that meet the criteria (Figure including four city wells and one irrigation well. The analysis was conducted using the classical Theis method with a correction for partial penetration developed by Bradbury and (1985). As is typical for fractured basalt aquifers, the hydraulic conductivity has a high variability, ranging from 14.5 to 436 ft/day, with a mean of 142 ft/day. For estimation purposes, the high and low value were excluded, and the distance to the well test was accounted for by taking the inverse distance-weighted mean. The resulting value of 101 ft/day was taken to be the most likely figure for the new wells. It is possible that the hydraulic conductivity could be significantly lower, which would not necessarily preclude development of a productive well but would result in greater drawdown and pumping lift. D.3. Interference analysis and well separation The distance between the two wells should be large enough to avoid undue interference between them. Interference means that the cone of depression induced by pumping a well intersects another well and causes its water level to be lower, thus reducing its potential yield and increasing pumping cost. There is no specific criteria for how much interference is too much. The Theis analysis was employed with hydraulic conductivity of 101 ft/d, saturated thickness of 346 feet, and a storativity of 0.001 which is representative of semi-confined conditions, and a pumping rate of 2000 gpm. After 30 days of continuous pumping, the drawdown versus distance curve was calculated as shown on the attached spreadsheet. Because of the high variability of hydraulic conductivity, a sensitivity analysis was performed by reducing the value by 25% to 75 ft/d. Based on the resulting curves, a separation distance such that the impacted well would lie the area where the cone of depression is beginning to flatten would be 400 feet, corresponding to a drawdown of 8.4 to 11.9 feet or 2.4% to 3.4% of the saturated depth. For planning purposes this should be considered the minimum separation, but a greater distance would be preferable to decrease the interference potential. After the first well is drilled and tested, data from the test can be used to refine this analysis. D.4. Aquifer water quality Water quality data in the close vicinity of the site is limited. IDWR maintains a database of water quality data collected by three Idaho agencies: IDWR, the Idaho Department of Agriculture, and IDEQ. Many samples exist for shallow domestic wells completed in the upper perched aquifer – which is the subject of significant water quality concern due to elevated nitrate levels – and a few samples exist for wells completed in the upper basalt. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Burley Well Location Analysis 5 Brockway Engineering PLLC / July 17, 2025 To assess only the lower production zone targeted by the new City wells, a query was made for wells having a depth greater than 330 feet. Within three miles of the site, there are two such domestic wells having data within the past 25 years. Data for these wells is provided in Appendix B. The most complete dataset is for well ISDA-9301601, located approximately 2 miles west of the site and having eight samples from 2001 through 2008. Physical and inorganic parameters were tested. Nitrate- nitrogen ranged from 2.5 mg/l to 7.7 mg/l; however, the most recent four samples were 2.7 or below. The MCL for nitrate is 10 mg/l. Other parameters were within limits. No organics, pesticides/herbidices, bacteriological, or radiological parameters were tested. Well ISDA-7906101 is located 1.8 miles south of the project site. Its data is limited, consisting of one sample in 2001. Nitrate was elevated at 6.33 mg/l. Other parameters were acceptable. No organics, bacteriological, or radiological parameters were tested. A limited test for herbicides was conducted in 2001, and found non-zero levels of Atrazine and Simazine. Water quality data for City wells is available on the IDEQ database for Wells and #7 (Appendix In the past ten years, wells have been tested annually for nitrate, twice each for VOCs, SOCs, and radiologicals, and sporadically for a limited suite of inorganic constitutents. Nitrate-nitrogen concentration ranges from non-detect to 2.74 mg/l. No detection of any VOC or SOC has occurred. Radiologicals are all below the MCL. Arsenic ranges from 0.002 to 0.003 mg/l, well below the MCL of 0.010 mg/l. Metals and other parameters are non-detect or below the MCL. Barium has consistently been detected at 0.04 to 0.1 mg/l, which is well below the MCL of 2.0 mg/l. In summary, the water quality data for the lower aquifer in the close vicinity of the proposed new well sites is limited in terms of number of samples and parameter coverage. The lower aquifer is likely well protected from surface influence by intervening low-permeability strata, and based on the City wells it appears likely that water quality will be suitable. However, the limited data from domestic well samples indicates that nitrate-nitrogen may be elevated in this area even in the lower aquifer. Because of these data limitations, it is recommended that the planning process for the new wells include additional testing by identifying a domestic near the site that is completed in the lower aquifer, and testing it for a comprehensive suite of IOCs, VOCs, SOCs, radiologicals, and biological parameters. There are at least four domestic wells that are cased to the lower basalt strata that could potentially be sampled. E. Recommended well locations Figure 2 shows all pertinent recommended setbacks, which define an acceptable zone for the two wells. Within these zones, two possible pairs of well locations are shown. Wells should be located outside the 500-foot setback to the H Canal and as far away from the canal as possible. Other locations than those shown on Figure 2 are possible. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Burley Well Location Analysis 6 Brockway Engineering PLLC / July 17, 2025 F. Preliminary well design Preliminary design schematics were prepared for the production wells (Appendix A 16-inch final casing diameter is contemplated, which will be sufficient for a 13-inch or 14-inch pump having a capacity of 2,000 gpm. The known lithology consisting of two alluvial zones and two basalt zones must be considered in the design. The method will likely be air rotary, and the drill-and-drive method to advance casing will be feasible, but basalt drilling will be open hole. Two alternative designs were prepared involving similar end products but with different depths of annular seal. Alternative 2 is simpler but may be more costly due to greater quantity of larger diameter drilling, and the additional surface seal. G. Risks of well development Based on known data from the City’s existing wells, it appears that the lower basalt strata targeted as the production zone is highly fractured with a relatively high transmissivity suitable for development of large municipal wells. However, well development in general carries certain risks, and development in basalt aquifers has additional considerations. Basalt aquifers are highly inhomogeneous, with the degree of fracturing often exhibiting very high spatial variation. The yield of a basalt well depends on the amount and nature of the water-bearing fractures that are intersected. Often wells located very near each other have large differences in performance. The proposed well sites are located west of the area where accurate well tests are available for the City’s existing wells. Because of the inhomogeneity of the aquifer, having test data close to the proposed site is important. The actual strata encountered during drilling may vary from the indications of surrounding well logs. This can sometimes necessitate field changes in the well construction, potentially resulting in greater cost than anticipated. A small-diameter exploratory well could be constructed to confirm the lithology and mitigate some of this risk. However, the very consistent lithology on the well logs and the known performance of the City wells makes the case for an exploratory well less compelling. H. Water right considerations The City currently holds water rights for both municipal, industrial, commercial, and irrigation beneficial uses. The contemplated new municipal wells are not currently listed as points of diversion on any City water right. Prior to construction of the wells, a water right transfer application must be filed with IDWR to add the wells as points of diversion. Adding the points of diversion will not provide any additional diversion rate or annual volume, but will allow the wells to be utilized as sources for the potable water system. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Burley Well Location Analysis 7 Brockway Engineering PLLC / July 17, 2025 This same transfer process could be used as an opportunity to evaluate and consolidate all of the City’s water rights to ensure that all municipal points of diversion (wells) are listed on all of the municipal water rights, and rectify any other irregularities with the City’s municipal, industrial, and commercial water rights. This will provide the maximum flexibility for future water usage and ensure strict compliance with the water right elements. I. Regulatory approvals The proposed wells and related facilities will require the following agency reviews and approvals by IDEQ and IDWR: 1. Well site review and approval. This is typically the first step, and involves a site inspection by IDEQ and potentially an analysis of setback issues if any concerns arise. 2. Preliminary Engineering Report and Plans & Specifications for well holes. These documents describe the engineering design for the well drilling and can be submitted separately or as a package to IDEQ. IDEQ may have comments or require changes, but ultimately will issue an “approved to construct” letter that allows the wells to be drilled. 3. Well completion report and as-built construction drawing approval. After the wells are drilled, pump-tested, and the water quality sample results are returned, a completion report and drawings showing actual as-built conditions are prepared. Based on these documents, IDEQ will issue an “approved to serve” letter, authorizing the wells to be placed online to serve the public. 4. Preliminary Engineering Report and Plans & Specifications for wellhouse and pumping facilities. These documents cover the engineering design of the well pumps, piping and appurtenances, well houses, and all other infrastructure related to delivering the water to the City system. IDEQ will review and issue an “approved to construct” letter. 5. As-built record drawings for the facilities. After completion, record drawings are prepared and submitted to IDEQ for review and approval. 6. Water right transfer to add wells as points of diversion. This requirement is discussed in Section H and must be completed prior to any well drilling permit can be issued. 7. Drilling permits. A drilling permit is the authorization from IDWR to construct the well. IDWR will only issue a drilling permit if an authorized point of diversion is on the water right(s) at the proposed well location. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Sna k e R i v er 30 USHwy 30 B ill Ruby S na OverlandAve SHighway27 Overlan EM ainSt W Mai nSt BurleyCity M unicipalGo Course BurleyM unicipal Airport Burley City W ell 1960 City W ell 1977 City W ell 1986 City W ell 2006 Hanks 3950 4050 4000 Sources: Esri, Tom Tom , Garm in, FAO, NOAA, USGS, OpenStreetM ap contributors, and the GIS User Com m unity Legend W ells within 0.75 m iles, over 200ft depth, over 150 SW L G roundwater Contours (unknown source) Hydraulic Conductivity Estim ation W ells Parcels FIG URE 1. PRO PERTY LO CA TIO N AND W ELLS 2023 NAIP AERIAL Path: F:\Projects\Burley, City of - New W ell\ArcPRO \Burley_Aerial\Burley_Aerial.aprx LM B - Date: 7/11/2025 3:02 PM 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0.13 M iles Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Legend Parcels Buffer from property line Potential Locations Canal_25 Canal_50 Canal_200 Canal_500 FIG URE 2. SETBACKS AND ACCEPTABLE W ELL SITES 2023 NAIP AERIAL Path: F:\Projects\Burley, City of - New W ell\ArcPRO \Burley_Aerial\Burley_Aerial.aprx LM B - Date: 7/11/2025 4:02 PM 0 130 260 390 520 65 Feet Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 2. Well Log Lithology City of Burley New Well Site Evaluation Wells within approx. 3/4 mile of site, deeper than ~200 feet Values in feet Piezo head Total First clay Static water on lower First basalt depth thickness Top Bottom level basalt Remarks 138 235 46 232 164 Completed in upper basalt 85 405 35 220 335 294 41 96 338 39 232 295 255 40 120 225 35 >225 178 Completed in upper basalt 72 330 39 230 282 253 29 120 295 Mixed 248 292 178 Completed in upper basalt 94 235 65 235 200 Completed in upper basalt 79 329 34 218 287 243 44 96 232 40 232 200 Completed in upper basalt 118 235 42 232 197 Completed in upper basalt 120 240 57 >240 185 Completed in upper basalt 93 390 57 214 331 308 23 Mean values: 103 291 44 229 304 221 35 SWL mean lower basalt 271 Lower alluvium/clay Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 Well lithology.xlsx:Sheet1 Page 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 3. Transmissivity Estimation with Partial Penetration Bradbury and (1985) specific capacity method Suitable for situations where a single time and drawdown measurement is available Includes effects of partial penetration using Sternberg (1973) approach Enter data in blue, pay attention to units. Vary "Trial T" until equal to "Calc Well Pumping Rate Drawdow n Time Well radius Storativity SWL Aquifer bottom Avg open interval Average aquifer thickness Specific capacity L/b G sp Trial T (vary) Calc T Calc K No. Name Location* [gpm] [ft] [min] [in] [ft] [ft] [ft] [ft] [ft2/d] [ft2/d] [ft/d] ln K 1 City of Burley 1986 10S23E20SWSE 1900 3.5 300 8 0.001 236 800 285 562.25 542.9 0.51 1.55 5.05 245057.7 245057.7 435.9 6.08 2 City of Burley 2006 10S23E21NWSW 3550 191 1500 10 0.001 257 800 273 447.5 18.6 0.61 1.65 2.96 6498.8 6498.8 14.5 2.68 3 City of Burley 1960 10S23E31NENE 2100 33 360 8 0.001 226 800 66.5 557.5 63.6 0.12 2.22 33.26 82848.5 82848.5 148.6 5.00 4 City of Burley 1977 10S23E32SENE 2200 24 600 8 0.001 267 800 251 521 91.7 0.48 1.53 5.51 41157.7 41157.7 79.0 4.37 5 Hanks 10S22E24SW 1000 50 480 8 0.001 323 800 103 452 20.0 0.23 1.81 15.96 15002.5 15002.5 33.2 3.50 Mean 78113.0 142.2 4.3 1 City of Burley 1986 435.9 1.96 2 City of Burley 2006 14.5 2.56 3 City of Burley 1960 148.6 1.27 4 City of Burley 1977 79.0 1.88 5 Hanks 33.2 2.66 Mean 142 Inverse distance-weighted mean 154 Mean excluding high and low 86.9 Inverse distance-weighted mean 101.2 Well No. Name Calc K (ft/d) Distance (mi) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 4b. Well drawdown estimation for City of Burley potential new wells Drawdown estimated using Theis approach Brockway Engineering, PLLC Hydraulic conductivity 75 ft/day Pumping rate 2000 gpm = 4.46 cfs Saturated thickness 316 feet Pumping time 720 hrs Transmissivity 177276 gpd/ft Well efficiency 0.85 Storage coefficient 0.001 Time R = 0.67 feet R = 50 feet R = 400 feet z well (days) (hrs) u W(u) z (feet) u W(u) z (feet) u W(u) z (feet) (ft) 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.3 30 3.8E-09 18.824 24.34 2.1E-05 10.189 13.17 1.4E-03 6.032 7.80 28.6 2.5 60 1.9E-09 19.517 25.23 1.1E-05 10.882 14.07 6.8E-04 6.724 8.69 29.7 3.8 90 1.3E-09 19.923 25.76 7.0E-06 11.288 14.59 4.5E-04 7.129 9.22 30.3 5.0 120 9.4E-10 20.210 26.13 5.3E-06 11.575 14.97 3.4E-04 7.417 9.59 30.7 6.3 150 7.5E-10 20.434 26.42 4.2E-06 11.799 15.25 2.7E-04 7.640 9.88 31.1 7.5 180 6.3E-10 20.616 26.65 3.5E-06 11.981 15.49 2.3E-04 7.822 10.11 31.4 8.8 210 5.4E-10 20.770 26.85 3.0E-06 12.135 15.69 1.9E-04 7.976 10.31 31.6 10.0 240 4.7E-10 20.904 27.03 2.6E-06 12.269 15.86 1.7E-04 8.110 10.49 31.8 11.3 270 4.2E-10 21.021 27.18 2.3E-06 12.386 16.01 1.5E-04 8.228 10.64 32.0 12.5 300 3.8E-10 21.127 27.31 2.1E-06 12.492 16.15 1.4E-04 8.333 10.77 32.1 13.8 330 3.4E-10 21.222 27.44 1.9E-06 12.587 16.27 1.2E-04 8.428 10.90 32.3 15.0 360 3.1E-10 21.309 27.55 1.8E-06 12.674 16.39 1.1E-04 8.515 11.01 32.4 16.3 390 2.9E-10 21.389 27.65 1.6E-06 12.754 16.49 1.0E-04 8.595 11.11 32.5 17.5 420 2.7E-10 21.463 27.75 1.5E-06 12.828 16.59 9.6E-05 8.669 11.21 32.6 18.8 450 2.5E-10 21.532 27.84 1.4E-06 12.897 16.67 9.0E-05 8.738 11.30 32.8 20.0 480 2.3E-10 21.597 27.92 1.3E-06 12.962 16.76 8.4E-05 8.803 11.38 32.8 21.3 510 2.2E-10 21.657 28.00 1.2E-06 13.022 16.84 7.9E-05 8.864 11.46 32.9 22.5 540 2.1E-10 21.715 28.07 1.2E-06 13.080 16.91 7.5E-05 8.921 11.53 33.0 23.8 570 2.0E-10 21.769 28.14 1.1E-06 13.134 16.98 7.1E-05 8.975 11.60 33.1 25.0 600 1.9E-10 21.820 28.21 1.1E-06 13.185 17.05 6.8E-05 9.026 11.67 33.2 26.3 630 1.8E-10 21.869 28.27 1.0E-06 13.234 17.11 6.4E-05 9.075 11.73 33.3 27.5 660 1.7E-10 21.915 28.33 9.6E-07 13.280 17.17 6.1E-05 9.121 11.79 33.3 28.8 690 1.6E-10 21.960 28.39 9.2E-07 13.325 17.23 5.9E-05 9.166 11.85 33.4 30.0 720 1.6E-10 22.002 28.45 8.8E-07 13.367 17.28 5.6E-05 9.208 11.91 33.5 31.3 750 1.5E-10 22.043 28.50 8.4E-07 13.408 17.34 5.4E-05 9.249 11.96 33.5 30-day Dist (ft) u W(u) z (ft) 10 4E-08 16.586 21.44 25 2E-07 14.754 19.07 50 9E-07 13.367 17.28 100 4E-06 11.981 15.49 200 1E-05 10.595 13.70 400 6E-05 9.208 11.91 600 0.0001 8.398 10.86 800 0.0002 7.822 10.11 1200 0.0005 7.012 9.07 1600 0.0009 6.437 8.32 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 Theis drawdown prediction - Burley new wells.xls:K=75 Page 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 4a. Well drawdown estimation for City of Burley potential new wells Drawdown estimated using Theis approach Brockway Engineering, PLLC Hydraulic conductivity 101 ft/day Pumping rate 2000 gpm = 4.46 cfs Saturated thickness 346 feet Pumping time 720 hrs Transmissivity 261396.1 gpd/ft Well efficiency 0.85 Storage coefficient 0.001 (confined) Time R = 0.67 feet R = 50 feet R = 100 feet z well (days) (hrs) u W(u) z (feet) u W(u) z (feet) u W(u) z (feet) (ft) 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.3 30 2.5E-09 19.212 16.85 1.4E-05 10.578 9.27 5.7E-05 9.191 8.06 19.8 2.5 60 1.3E-09 19.906 17.45 7.2E-06 11.271 9.88 2.9E-05 9.884 8.67 20.5 3.8 90 8.5E-10 20.311 17.81 4.8E-06 11.676 10.24 1.9E-05 10.290 9.02 21.0 5.0 120 6.4E-10 20.599 18.06 3.6E-06 11.964 10.49 1.4E-05 10.578 9.27 21.2 6.3 150 5.1E-10 20.822 18.26 2.9E-06 12.187 10.69 1.1E-05 10.801 9.47 21.5 7.5 180 4.2E-10 21.004 18.42 2.4E-06 12.369 10.85 9.5E-06 10.983 9.63 21.7 8.8 210 3.6E-10 21.158 18.55 2.0E-06 12.523 10.98 8.2E-06 11.137 9.77 21.8 10.0 240 3.2E-10 21.292 18.67 1.8E-06 12.657 11.10 7.2E-06 11.271 9.88 22.0 11.3 270 2.8E-10 21.410 18.77 1.6E-06 12.775 11.20 6.4E-06 11.388 9.99 22.1 12.5 300 2.5E-10 21.515 18.87 1.4E-06 12.880 11.29 5.7E-06 11.494 10.08 22.2 13.8 330 2.3E-10 21.610 18.95 1.3E-06 12.975 11.38 5.2E-06 11.589 10.16 22.3 15.0 360 2.1E-10 21.697 19.02 1.2E-06 13.062 11.45 4.8E-06 11.676 10.24 22.4 16.3 390 2.0E-10 21.777 19.10 1.1E-06 13.142 11.52 4.4E-06 11.756 10.31 22.5 17.5 420 1.8E-10 21.852 19.16 1.0E-06 13.217 11.59 4.1E-06 11.830 10.37 22.5 18.8 450 1.7E-10 21.921 19.22 9.5E-07 13.286 11.65 3.8E-06 11.899 10.43 22.6 20.0 480 1.6E-10 21.985 19.28 8.9E-07 13.350 11.71 3.6E-06 11.964 10.49 22.7 21.3 510 1.5E-10 22.046 19.33 8.4E-07 13.411 11.76 3.4E-06 12.024 10.54 22.7 22.5 540 1.4E-10 22.103 19.38 7.9E-07 13.468 11.81 3.2E-06 12.082 10.59 22.8 23.8 570 1.3E-10 22.157 19.43 7.5E-07 13.522 11.86 3.0E-06 12.136 10.64 22.9 25.0 600 1.3E-10 22.208 19.47 7.2E-07 13.573 11.90 2.9E-06 12.187 10.69 22.9 26.3 630 1.2E-10 22.257 19.52 6.8E-07 13.622 11.94 2.7E-06 12.236 10.73 23.0 27.5 660 1.2E-10 22.304 19.56 6.5E-07 13.669 11.98 2.6E-06 12.282 10.77 23.0 28.8 690 1.1E-10 22.348 19.60 6.2E-07 13.713 12.02 2.5E-06 12.327 10.81 23.1 30.0 720 1.1E-10 22.391 19.63 6.0E-07 13.756 12.06 2.4E-06 12.369 10.85 23.1 31.3 750 1.0E-10 22.431 19.67 5.7E-07 13.796 12.10 2.3E-06 12.410 10.88 23.1 30-day Dist (ft) u W(u) z (ft) 10 2E-08 16.974 14.88 25 1E-07 15.142 13.28 50 6E-07 13.756 12.06 100 2E-06 12.369 10.85 200 1E-05 10.983 9.63 400 4E-05 9.597 8.41 600 9E-05 8.786 7.70 800 0.0002 8.211 7.20 1200 0.0003 7.400 6.49 1600 0.0006 6.825 5.98 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 Theis drawdown prediction - Burley new wells.xls:K=101 Page 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix A Selected Well Drilling Records Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix B Water Quality Data Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER QUALITY DATA - DOMESTIC WELLS Agency WellNumbeAgencyWellName SampleDat Type Name Value Units ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Inorg Chloride 56 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Inorg Sulfate 98 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Nutr Ammonia BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Nutr Nitrate 7.68 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Nutr Phosphate, ortho 0.45 mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Phys pH 7.27 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Phys Specific Conductance 998 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20001018 Phys Water Temperature 12.9 °C ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Alkalinity as (CaCO3) 310 mg/l as CaCO3 ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Aluminum BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Barium 0.085 ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Beryllium BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Bromide 0.2 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Cadmium BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Calcium 58 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Chloride 79 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Chromium BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Cobalt BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Copper 0.03 ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Fluoride 0.44 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Iron 0.13 ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Magnesium 46 ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Molybdenum BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Nickel BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Potassium 9 ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Sodium 110 ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Sulfate 99 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Vanadium BDL ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Inorg Zinc 0.19 ug/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Nutr Ammonia BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Nutr Nitrate 7.5 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Nutr Phosphate, ortho BDL mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Phys pH 7.08 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Phys Specific Conductance 1035 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20020808 Phys Water Temperature 12.1 °C ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Inorg Alkalinity as (CaCO3) 260 mg/l as CaCO3 ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Inorg Bromide 0.13 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Inorg Chloride 55 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Inorg Fluoride 0.47 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Inorg Sulfate 74 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Nutr Ammonia BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Nutr Nitrate 4.8 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Nutr Phosphate, ortho ND mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Phys pH 6.96 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Phys Specific Conductance 838 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20030811 Phys Water Temperature 13.4 °C ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Inorg Bromide 0.14 mg/l Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Inorg Chloride 60 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Inorg Fluoride 0.48 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Inorg Sulfate 86 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Nutr Ammonia BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Nutr Nitrate 6.3 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Nutr Phosphate, ortho ND mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Phys pH 7.03 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Phys Specific Conductance 806 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20040803 Phys Water Temperature 15 °C ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Inorg Bromide 0.13 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Inorg Chloride 52 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Inorg Fluoride 0.25 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Inorg Sulfate 45 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Nutr Ammonia BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Nutr Nitrate 2.5 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Nutr Phosphate, ortho ND mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Phys pH 6.87 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Phys Specific Conductance 611 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20050801 Phys Water Temperature 17.1 °C ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Inorg Bromide 0.12 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Inorg Chloride 56 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Inorg Fluoride ND mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Inorg Sulfate 49 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Nutr Ammonia ND mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Nutr Nitrate 2.7 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Nutr Phosphate, ortho ND mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Phys pH 7.68 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Phys Specific Conductance 586 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20060808 Phys Water Temperature 17.4 °C ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Inorg Bromide BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Inorg Chloride 54 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Inorg Fluoride 0.21 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Inorg Sulfate 45 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Nutr Ammonia BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Nutr Nitrate 2.7 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Nutr Phosphate, ortho ND mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Phys pH 7.94 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Phys Specific Conductance 574 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20070725 Phys Water Temperature 17.5 °C ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Inorg Bromide BDL mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Inorg Chloride 51 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Inorg Fluoride 0.27 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Inorg Sulfate 45 mg/l ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Nutr Nitrate 2.8 mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Nutr Phosphate, ortho ND mg/l as P ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Phys pH 7.73 pH ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Phys Specific Conductance 610 uS/cm ISDA 9301601 ISDA-9301601 20080722 Phys Water Temperature 17.2 °C Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- WATER QUALITY DATA - DOMESTIC WELLS Agency WellNumbeAgencyWellName SampleDat Type Name Value Units ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Inorg Chloride 41 mg/l ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Inorg Sulfate 107 mg/l ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Nutr Ammonia ND mg/l ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Nutr Nitrate 6.33 mg/l as N ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Nutr Nitrite ND mg/l as N ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Nutr Phosphate, ortho 0.43 mg/l as P ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Phys pH 7.67 pH ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Phys Specific Conductance 601 uS/cm ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Phys Water Temperature 15.2 °C ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Pest Atrazine 0.12 ug/l ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Pest Atrazine, desethyl 0.094 ug/l ISDA 7906101 ISDA-7906101 20010710 Pest Simazine 0.065 ug/l Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF BURLEY WELL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING Samples for nitrate-N, limited IOCs, VOCs, and SOCs Radiologicals, haloacetic acids, and TTHM all below MCL Source Parameter Sample Date Result Units MCL Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 4/24/2025 1.14 mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 4/24/2025 ND mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 4/24/2025 ND mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 4/24/2025 2.25 mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 6/4/2024 0.76 mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 6/4/2024 2.21 mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 6/4/2024 ND mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 10/18/2023 1.66 mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 10/18/2023 2.33 mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 11/29/2022 1.81 mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 11/29/2022 2.03 mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/8/2021 ND mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/8/2021 2.41 mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/8/2021 1.71 mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/8/2021 ND mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/21/2020 1.69 mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/21/2020 2.23 mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/10/2019 1.15 mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/10/2019 2.74 mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/4/2018 ND mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/4/2018 2.39 mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/4/2018 1.93 mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 12/4/2018 0.74 mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 7/11/2017 ND mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 7/11/2017 2.51 mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 7/11/2017 ND mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 7/11/2017 1.333 mg/l 10 Well 4 Nitrate-nitrogen 8/9/2016 2.15 mg/l 10 Well 3 Nitrate-nitrogen 6/21/2016 2.49 mg/l 10 Well 2 Nitrate-nitrogen 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 10 Well 7 Nitrate-nitrogen 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 10 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 City wells WQ.xlsx:ALL Page 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Well 7 ARSENIC 10/18/2023 0.00256 mg/l 0.01 Well 7 BARIUM 10/18/2023 0.06444 mg/l 2 Well 7 CADMIUM 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 CHROMIUM 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 7 FLUORIDE 10/18/2023 0.64 mg/l 4 Well 7 MERCURY 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 7 NICKEL 10/18/2023 ND mg/l None Well 7 SELENIUM 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 0.05 Well 7 SODIUM 10/18/2023 32.7 mg/l None Well 7 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 0.006 Well 7 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 0.004 Well 7 THALLIUM, TOTAL 10/18/2023 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 7 ARSENIC 12/21/2020 0.00276 mg/l 0.01 Well 7 BARIUM 12/21/2020 0.0448 mg/l 2 Well 7 CADMIUM 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 CHROMIUM 12/21/2020 0.00371 mg/l 0.1 Well 7 FLUORIDE 12/21/2020 0.57 mg/l 4 Well 7 MERCURY 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 7 NICKEL 12/21/2020 ND mg/l None Well 7 SELENIUM 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 0.05 Well 7 SODIUM 12/21/2020 32.9 mg/l None Well 7 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 0.006 Well 7 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 0.004 Well 7 THALLIUM, TOTAL 12/21/2020 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 2 ARSENIC 9/10/2019 0.003 mg/l 0.01 Well 2 BARIUM 9/10/2019 0.29 mg/l 2 Well 2 CADMIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 CHROMIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 2 FLUORIDE 9/10/2019 0.59 mg/l 4 Well 2 MERCURY 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 2 NICKEL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l None Well 2 SELENIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.05 Well 2 SODIUM 9/10/2019 34 mg/l None Well 2 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.006 Well 2 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.004 Well 2 THALLIUM, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 3 ARSENIC 9/10/2019 0.003 mg/l 0.01 Well 3 BARIUM 9/10/2019 0.25 mg/l 2 Well 3 CADMIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 CHROMIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 3 FLUORIDE 9/10/2019 0.45 mg/l 4 Well 3 MERCURY 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 3 NICKEL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l None Well 3 SELENIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.05 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 City wells WQ.xlsx:ALL Page 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Well 3 SODIUM 9/10/2019 31 mg/l None Well 3 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.006 Well 3 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.004 Well 3 THALLIUM, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 4 ARSENIC 9/10/2019 0.002 mg/l 0.01 Well 4 BARIUM 9/10/2019 0.39 mg/l 2 Well 4 CADMIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 CHROMIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 4 FLUORIDE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 4 Well 4 MERCURY 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 4 NICKEL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l None Well 4 SELENIUM 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.05 Well 4 SODIUM 9/10/2019 39 mg/l None Well 4 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.006 Well 4 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.004 Well 4 THALLIUM, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 7 ARSENIC 10/11/2016 0.003 mg/l 0.01 Well 7 BARIUM 10/11/2016 0.1 mg/l 2 Well 7 CADMIUM 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 CHROMIUM 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 7 FLUORIDE 10/11/2016 0.6 mg/l 4 Well 7 MERCURY 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 7 NICKEL 10/11/2016 ND mg/l None Well 7 SELENIUM 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 0.05 Well 7 SODIUM 10/11/2016 35 mg/l None Well 7 ANTIMONY, TOTAL 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 0.006 Well 7 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 0.004 Well 7 THALLIUM, TOTAL 10/11/2016 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 3 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 3 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 3 XYLENES, TOTAL 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 10 Well 3 DICHLOROMETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.6 Well 3 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.075 Well 3 VINYL CHLORIDE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 3 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.007 Well 3 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEN 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 3 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.2 Well 3 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 City wells WQ.xlsx:ALL Page 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Well 3 CHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 3 BENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 TOLUENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 1 Well 3 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.7 Well 3 STYRENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 2 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 2 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 2 XYLENES, TOTAL 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 10 Well 2 DICHLOROMETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.6 Well 2 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.075 Well 2 VINYL CHLORIDE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 2 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.007 Well 2 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEN 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 2 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.2 Well 2 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 CHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 2 BENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 TOLUENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 1 Well 2 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.7 Well 2 STYRENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 4 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 4 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 4 XYLENES, TOTAL 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 10 Well 4 DICHLOROMETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.6 Well 4 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.075 Well 4 VINYL CHLORIDE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 4 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.007 Well 4 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEN 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 4 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.2 Well 4 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 CHLOROBENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 4 BENZENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.005 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 City wells WQ.xlsx:ALL Page 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Well 4 TOLUENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 1 Well 4 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.7 Well 4 STYRENE 11/29/2022 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 7 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 7 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 7 XYLENES, TOTAL 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 10 Well 7 DICHLOROMETHANE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.6 Well 7 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.075 Well 7 VINYL CHLORIDE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 7 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.007 Well 7 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEN 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 7 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.2 Well 7 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 CHLOROBENZENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 7 BENZENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 7 TOLUENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 1 Well 7 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.7 Well 7 STYRENE 9/10/2019 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 4 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 4 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 4 XYLENES, TOTAL 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 10 Well 4 DICHLOROMETHANE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.6 Well 4 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.075 Well 4 VINYL CHLORIDE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 4 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.007 Well 4 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEN 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 4 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.2 Well 4 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 CHLOROBENZENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 4 BENZENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 4 TOLUENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 1 Well 4 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.7 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 City wells WQ.xlsx:ALL Page 5 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Well 4 STYRENE 8/23/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 3 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 3 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 3 XYLENES, TOTAL 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 10 Well 3 DICHLOROMETHANE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.6 Well 3 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.075 Well 3 VINYL CHLORIDE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 3 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.007 Well 3 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEN 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 3 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.2 Well 3 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 CHLOROBENZENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 3 BENZENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 3 TOLUENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 1 Well 3 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.7 Well 3 STYRENE 6/21/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 2 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 2 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.07 Well 2 XYLENES, TOTAL 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 10 Well 2 DICHLOROMETHANE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.6 Well 2 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.075 Well 2 VINYL CHLORIDE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.002 Well 2 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.007 Well 2 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEN 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 2 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.2 Well 2 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 CHLOROBENZENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Well 2 BENZENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.005 Well 2 TOLUENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 1 Well 2 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.7 Well 2 STYRENE 5/24/2016 ND mg/l 0.1 Brockway Engineering, PLLC 7/14/2025 City wells WQ.xlsx:ALL Page 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix C Preliminary Well Design Schematics Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- SWL 271'± ANNULAR SEAL, BENTONITE CHIP OR GROUT 59' CLAY, SOME SAND AND GRAVEL 16" CASING, 0.375" WALL 24" OVERBORE AND TEMPORARY CASING 103' CLAY BASALT, POSSIBLE WATER SAND AND GRAVEL WITH WATER 229' 20" OPEN HOLE 334' 650' (DEPTH TBD) 20" CASING, 0.375" WALL BASALT PRODUCTION ZONE 16" OPEN HOLE F:\Projects\Burley, City of - New Well\CAD\797-05-2025_Wells_A_LMB_cgb-tweaks.dwg CITY OF BURLEY, IDAHO NEW WELL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BY BROCKWAY ENGINEERING, PLLC FOR A SPECIFIC PROJECT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT. REUSE OF THIS DRAWING FOR ANY PURPOSE IS PROHIBITED UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM BOTH BROCKWAY ENGINEERING & THE CLIENT IS GRANTED. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV APPRO. BY DESCRIPTION DATE A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 7/11/2025 A DWG # REV PROJECT # [SSN REDACTED] (8.5 X 11 DWG ONLY) DRAFTED BY LMB DESIGNED BY CGB HYDRAULICS ♦ HYDROLOGY ♦ WATER RESOURCES 2016 WASHINGTON ST NORTH, STE 4 TWIN FALLS, ID 83301 (208) 736-8543 BROCKWAY ENGINEERING SCALE: NTS 1 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE #1 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- ANNULAR SEAL, BENTONITE CHIP OR GROUT 59' CLAY, SOME SAND AND GRAVEL 103' CLAY BASALT, POSSIBLE WATER SAND AND GRAVEL WITH WATER 229' 20" OPEN HOLE TO 239'± 334' 650' (DEPTH TBD) 20" OVERBORE AND TEMPORARY CASING BASALT PRODUCTION ZONE 16" OPEN HOLE SWL 271'± 16" CASING, 0.375" WALL F:\Projects\Burley, City of - New Well\CAD\797-05-2025_Wells_A_LMB_cgb-tweaks.dwg CITY OF BURLEY, IDAHO NEW WELL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BY BROCKWAY ENGINEERING, PLLC FOR A SPECIFIC PROJECT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT. REUSE OF THIS DRAWING FOR ANY PURPOSE IS PROHIBITED UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM BOTH BROCKWAY ENGINEERING & THE CLIENT IS GRANTED. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV APPRO. BY DESCRIPTION DATE A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 7/11/2025 A DWG # REV PROJECT # [SSN REDACTED] (8.5 X 11 DWG ONLY) DRAFTED BY LMB DESIGNED BY CGB HYDRAULICS ♦ HYDROLOGY ♦ WATER RESOURCES 2016 WASHINGTON ST NORTH, STE 4 TWIN FALLS, ID 83301 (208) 736-8543 BROCKWAY ENGINEERING SCALE: NTS 2 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE #2 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX M Capital Improvement Plan Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 CIP Summary 1.1 Well 5 and Booster Station Replacement (MPZ) Facility has reached useful life 7,400,000 $ 1.2 Well 4, Booster Station, and Tank Improvements Facility has reached useful life 8,069,000 $ 1.3 Well 2, 3, and 6 Improvements Security and electrical conditions 631,000 $ 1.4 ITD Highway 30 Waterline Replacement Downtown FF deficiencies/ITD project 4,869,000 $ 1.5 Downtown Waterline Replacement Downtown FF deficiencies 4,119,000 $ 1.6 S 600 W and 400 South Road Waterline Improvements Commercial FF deficiencies 4,743,000 $ 29,831,000 $ 2.1 Water Master Plan Update Recommended timeline 250,000 $ 2.2 UPZ West Well, Tank, and Booster Station UPZ creation 14,195,000 $ 2.3 UPZ West Well 2 UPZ supply redundancy 4,684,000 $ 2.4 Booster Station 5 UPZ Improvements UPZ creation 515,000 $ 2.5 UPZ Waterline Improvements UPZ creation 9,468,000 $ 29,112,000 $ 3.1 Water Master Plan Update Recommended timeline 250,000 $ 3.2 Airport Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 2,273,000 $ 3.3 Park and W Railroad Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 3,898,000 $ 3.4 South of Railroad Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 2,388,000 $ 3.5 North Overland Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 3,365,000 $ 3.6 Overland Shopping Center Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 3,855,000 $ 3.7 East Railroad Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 2,816,000 $ 3.8 South Overland Ave Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 3,889,000 $ 3.9 Miller and Oakley Ave Alley Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 2,631,000 $ 3.10 Hiland Ave Subdivision Waterline Addition Commercial FF deficiencies 242,000 $ 3.11 E 16th Street Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 3,804,000 $ 29,411,000 $ 4.1 Water Master Plan Update Recommended timeline 250,000 $ 4.2 Elba and Malta Ave Alley Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 2,279,000 $ 4.3 Syringa Plaza Apartments Waterline Replacement Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 1,651,000 $ 4.4 Occidental, Yale, Schodde Alley Waterline Replacment Commercial and residential FF deficiencies 3,904,000 $ 4.5 E 3rd Street Waterline Replacement Commercial FF deficiencies 689,000 $ 4.6 Burton and Conant From 13th to 16th Street Alley Waterline Replacement Residential FF deficiencies 2,609,000 $ 4.7 Burton and Conant from 5th to 9th Street Alley Waterline Replacment Residential FF deficiencies 2,178,000 $ 4.8 Hansen and Normal Alley Waterline Replacement Residential FF deficiencies 3,875,000 $ 4.9 Burton, Conant, and Miller from 16th to 21st Street Alley Waterline Replacement Residential FF deficiencies 3,680,000 $ 21,115,000 $ 109,469,000 $ ID# Priority 3 Improvements (2036 - 2042) Priority 2 Improvements (2032-2035) Priority 1 Improvements (2026-2031) Total Estimated Cost (2025 Dollars) Project Trigger Project Name Total Priority 1 Improvements (rounded) TOTAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COSTS (rounded) Total Priority 2 Improvements (rounded) Total Priority 3 Improvements (rounded) Total Priority 4 Improvements (rounded) The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein.” Priority 4 Improvements (2036 - 2042) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Well 5 and Booster Station Replacement (MPZ) Project Identifier: 1.1 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Well Facility 1 LS 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ Booster Station Facility (Building and Electrical to Accommodate Pumps to UPZ) 1 LS 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,600,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $360,000 $3,960,000 Contingency 30% $1,188,000 $5,148,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $772,000 $5,920,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $1,480,000 $ 7,400,000 Subtotal Location: Well 5 Site Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • The Well 5 and Booster Station facilities have reached the end of their useful life with several deficiencies such as a leaking roof, outdated HVAC equipment, and outdated motor control center with no available replacement parts. In addition, the roof access is a safety concern for operators. Objective: • Construct a new well facility and new booster station to pump to the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ) with improvements that will accommodate a future project (CIP 2.4) that will pump to Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ). Design Considerations: • Project assumes existing Well 5 will continue to be used and a new well facility constructed around it. Consider constructing the new well facility during non-peak periods fall/winter) • Site new booster station in a manner to allow existing facilities to remain operable during construction. Booster Station building, electrical, mechanical piping to be sized to accommodate future pumping to the UPZ. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Well 4, Booster Station, and Tank Improvements Project Identifier: 1.2 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Well Facility 1 LS 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ Booster Station Facility 1 LS 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ Tank 4 Improvements 1 LS 325,000 $ 325,000 $ 3,925,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $393,000 $4,318,000 Contingency 30% $1,295,000 $5,613,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $842,000 $6,455,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $1,614,000 $ 8,069,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Well 4 Site Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • The Well 4 and Booster Station have reached their useful life with several deficiencies such as deteriorating building conditions, outdated HVAC, and outdated electrical and controls. Booster pumps 3 and 4 need replaced. Additionally Tank 4 has several deficiencies such as corrosion, tank leaks, and lack of fall protection. Objective: • Construct a new Well and Booster Station facility and complete Tank 4 improvements. Design Considerations: • Project assumes existing Well 4 will continue to be used and a new well facility constructed around it. Consider constructing the new well facility during non- peak periods fall/winter) • Site new booster station in a manner to allow existing facilities to remain operable during construction. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Well 2, 3, and 6 Improvements Project Identifier: 1.3 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Well 6 Well 6 Electrical 1 EA 100,000 $ 100,000 $ Well 6 Fence Improvement 1 LS 2,000 $ 2,000 $ Replace Well 6 Gutters 1 LS 1,500 $ 1,500 $ Well 2 Well 2 Electrical 1 LS 125,000 $ 125,000 $ Remove and Brick in Window 2 EA 3,000 $ 6,000 $ Well 3 Well 3 Electrical 1 EA 40,000 $ 40,000 $ Seal Door 1 EA 14,000 $ 14,000 $ Remove and Brick in Window 6 EA 3,000 $ 18,000 $ 306,500 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $31,000 $337,500 Contingency 30% $101,000 $438,500 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $66,000 $504,500 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $126,000 $ 631,000 Location: Well Sites 2, 3, and 6 Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Subtotal Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • Well 2, 3, and 6 are in need of electrical and security improvements. Objective: • Well 6 - Higher Priority • Replace pump starters, address gap in fence by gate, replace electrical panels, and repair gutters. • Well 2 • Replace pump staters, address window security, and replace motor control center (MCC). • Well 3 • Replace pump starters, address wooden door for security, and address window security. Design Considerations: • These tasks can be completed in smaller projects or as one project. If broken into smaller projects Well 6 is a higher priority because Well 2 and 3 run less frequently than Well 6. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: ITD Highway 30 Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 1.4 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 220 LF 175 $ 39,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 5,000 LF 165 $ 825,000 $ 24-inch Casing 660 LF 1,000 $ 660,000 $ Boring (24" Casing) 150 LF 1,700 $ 255,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 12,800 $ 13,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 8 EA 8,500 $ 68,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 6 EA 4,300 $ 26,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 34 EA 5,000 $ 170,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 1,720 LF 115 $ 198,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,620 LF 21 $ 56,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 5,220 LF 11 $ 58,000 $ 2,368,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $237,000 $2,605,000 Contingency 30% $782,000 $3,387,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $508,000 $3,895,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $974,000 $ 4,869,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Main Street Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that does not meet fire flow requirements. Objective: • Replaced undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm of fire flow for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • These waterline improvements are to be coordinated with an ITD roadway project. • Project includes four 8-inch and two 12-inch Highway 30 crossings. • Project costs assumes pipe and casing will be installed with open trench and surface restoration along Main Street is accounted for with the ITD roadway project. • A future waterline through the airport could augment fire flows near the 12- inch Highway 30 crossing, however, this project may be outside of the planning period. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Downtown Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 1.5 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 4,940 LF 175 $ 865,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 350 LF 165 $ 58,000 $ Boring (24" Casing) 260 LF 1,700 $ 442,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 12,800 $ 26,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 8 EA 8,500 $ 68,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 8 EA 4,300 $ 35,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 10 EA 5,000 $ 50,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 3,040 LF 115 $ 350,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,250 LF 21 $ 48,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 5,550 LF 11 $ 62,000 $ 2,004,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $200,000 $2,204,000 Contingency 30% $661,000 $2,865,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $430,000 $3,295,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $824,000 $ 4,119,000 Subtotal Location: W 13th Street Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • This is a commercial and residential area that does not meet fire flow requirements. Objective: • Construct a waterline to provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for commercial zones and 1,000 gpm for residential zones. Design Considerations: • Consider coordinating with Project 1.4. • Includes railroad and Highway 27 crossing. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: S 600 W and 400 South Road Waterline Improvements Project Identifier: 1.6 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 5,750 LF 175 $ 1,007,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 350 LF 165 $ 58,000 $ Boring (24" Casing) 100 LF 1,700 $ 170,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 8 EA 12,800 $ 103,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 12 EA 8,500 $ 102,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 11 EA 5,000 $ 55,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 6,000 LF 115 $ 690,000 $ HWY Repair - full lane 350 LF 150 $ 53,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 6,200 LF 11 $ 69,000 $ 2,307,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $231,000 $2,538,000 Contingency 30% $761,000 $3,299,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $495,000 $3,794,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $949,000 $ 4,743,000 Location: 400 South Road / S 600 W Road / Overland Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Includes crossing of ITD ROW. • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Water Master Plan Update Project Identifier: 2.1 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Water Master Plan Update 1 LS 250,000 $ 250,000 $ $ 250,000 Location: Burley, Idaho Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • At the start of the Priority 2 improvements timeline, the current water master plan will be approximately 5 years old and the system should be re-evaluated. Objective: • Update planning criteria, identify existing and future water system needs, and develop an updated CIP. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: UPZ West Well, Tank, and Booster Station Project Identifier: 2.2 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Test Well 1 LS 150,000 $ 150,000 $ Production Well 1 LS 300,000 $ 300,000 $ Well Facility 1 LS 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 1,400 LF 175 $ 245,000 $ 16-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 500 LF 260 $ 130,000 $ New West Booster Station Facility (UPZ and MPZ) 1 LS 2,250,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 1.5 MG Pre-Stressed Concrete Tank 1 LS 2,230,000 $ 2,230,000 $ 6,905,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $691,000 $7,596,000 Contingency 30% $2,279,000 $9,875,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $1,481,000 $11,356,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $2,839,000 $ 14,195,000 Subtotal Location: Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • Dedicated water supply, storage, and delivery are needed to service the new Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ). Objective: • Construct a well, 1.5 MG tank, and booster station to pump 3,000 gpm to the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ) and 4,000 gpm to the UPZ. Design Considerations: • Length and size of 12-inch pipe to the MPZ and UPZ should be re-evaluated based on tank and booster station siting. • The tank material was assumed to be pre-stressed concrete with a flat supported slab roof. Tank material and type should be evaluated as part of the pre-design. • See well siting recommendations and setback requirements summarized in the Technical Memo provided by Brockway Engineering in Appendix L. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: UPZ West Well 2 Project Identifier: 2.3 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 1,300 LF 175 $ 228,000 $ Test Well 1 LS 150,000 $ 150,000 $ Production Well 1 LS 300,000 $ 300,000 $ Well Facility 1 LS 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,278,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $228,000 $2,506,000 Contingency 30% $752,000 $3,258,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $489,000 $3,747,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $937,000 $ 4,684,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • As the Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ) develops a second supply source is required for redundancy. Objective: • Construct a well facilicy that will also fill the UPZ Tank from CIP 2.2. Design Considerations: • This secondary well will have similar setup to Well 6, Well 5 and Tank 5. • Length and size of 12-inch pipe from the new well to the tank should be re- evaluated based on well siting and capacity. • See well siting recommendations and setback requirements summarized in the Technical Memo provided by Brockway Engineering in Appendix L. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Booster Station 5 UPZ Improvements Project Identifier: 2.4 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Booster Station Improvements (UPZ Pumps and Mechanical Piping) 1 LS 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $25,000 $275,000 Contingency 30% $83,000 $358,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $54,000 $412,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $103,000 $ 515,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • CIP 1.1 details the replacement of Booster Station 5. This improvement allows Booster Station 5 to pump to both pressure zones. It is needed for the development of the Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ) to have sufficient delivery. Objective: • Complete Booster Station 5 improvements so that Booster Station 5 can pump to both the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ) and Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ). Design Considerations: • Costs to include pumps, electrical, and controls for Booster Station 5 improvements. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Need for Project: • As development occurs further south a new upper pressure zone is needed to provide water service. Objective: • Install pumps and mechanical piping to serve the UPZ. Design Considerations: • Costs include pumps and mechanical piping for UPZ. Building and electrical costs are included in CIP 1.1. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: UPZ Waterline Improvements Project Identifier: 2.5 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 16-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 14,300 LF 260 $ 3,718,000 $ PRV with Vault valve) 1 EA 50,000 $ 50,000 $ Boring (24" Casing) 100 LF 1,700 $ 170,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 12,800 $ 39,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (14") 3 EA 15,000 $ 45,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (16") 2 EA 18,000 $ 36,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 3,700 LF 115 $ 426,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 4,200 LF 21 $ 89,000 $ Natural Surface Repair 6,400 LF 5 $ 32,000 $ 4,605,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $461,000 $5,066,000 Contingency 30% $1,520,000 $6,586,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $988,000 $7,574,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $1,894,000 $ 9,468,000 Subtotal Location: Upper Pressure Zone and Main Pressure Zone Southern Boundary See Figure 5 in Appendix M Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • As the Upper Pressure Zone (UPZ) develops additional piping is needed to convey water efficiently across the zone. Objective: • Install 16-inch transmission lines along the boundary of the Main Pressure Zone (MPZ) and UPZ. Convert the existing 14-inch transmission line from the MPZ to the UPZ. Install a pressure reducing valve (PRV) between MPZ and UPZ at Parke Avenue. Design Considerations: • Consider phasing this project as development occurs in the UPZ. • Surface restoration may vary depending on development and phasing. • Consider coordinating construction on Parke Ave with school schedule. • Canal crossing near Well 5 site. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Water Master Plan Update Project Identifier: 3.1 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Water Master Plan Update 1 LS 250,000 $ 250,000 $ $ 250,000 Location: Burley, Idaho Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • At the start of the Priority 2 improvements timeline, the current water master plan will be approximately 10 years old and the system should be re-evaluated. Objective: • Update planning criteria, identify existing and future water system needs, and develop an updated CIP. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Airport Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.2 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 3,450 LF 175 $ 604,000 $ 10-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 1,200 LF 170 $ 204,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 12,800 $ 26,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 23 EA 5,000 $ 115,000 $ Sod Surface Repair 1,200 LF 35 $ 42,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,250 LF 21 $ 48,000 $ HWY Repair 1 LS 14,000 $ 14,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 4,650 LF 11 $ 52,000 $ 1,105,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $111,000 $1,216,000 Contingency 30% $365,000 $1,581,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $237,000 $1,818,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $455,000 $ 2,273,000 Subtotal Location: Burley Municipal Airport Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replaced undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm fire flow for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Construction within ITD ROW • - Coordination with the airport and parks. • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Park and W Railroad Ave Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.3 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 2,900 LF 175 $ 508,000 $ 10-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 1,700 LF 170 $ 289,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 1,400 LF 165 $ 231,000 $ Boring (24" Casing) 100 LF 1,700 $ 170,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 12,800 $ 26,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 8,500 $ 26,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 4,300 $ 5,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 18 EA 5,000 $ 90,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 3,800 LF 115 $ 437,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,200 LF 21 $ 47,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 6,000 LF 11 $ 66,000 $ 1,895,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $190,000 $2,085,000 Contingency 30% $626,000 $2,711,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $407,000 $3,118,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $780,000 $ 3,898,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Park and W Railroad Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing commercial and residential area that does not meet the fire flow goals of 2,500 and 1,000 gpm, respectively. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for commercial areas and 1,000 gpm for existing residential areas. Design Considerations: • - Railroad ROW crossing. • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: South of Railroad Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.4 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 4,200 LF 165 $ 693,000 $ Boring (18" Casing) 100 LF 1,500 $ 150,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 12,800 $ 26,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 5 EA 8,500 $ 43,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 4,300 $ 9,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 14 EA 5,000 $ 70,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 150 LF 115 $ 18,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 3,650 LF 21 $ 77,000 $ Sod Surface Repair 400 LF 35 $ 14,000 $ HWY Repair 1 LS 14,000 $ 14,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 4,300 LF 11 $ 48,000 $ 1,162,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $116,000 $1,278,000 Contingency 30% $383,000 $1,661,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $249,000 $1,910,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $478,000 $ 2,388,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: South of Railroad and Normal Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Includes ITD ROW crossings. • - Coordination with the park. • - Maintain service to residents. • - If proposed replacement becomes too costly to coordinate with rail spurs, City can consider the alternative routing proposed in red. • - Provided costs are based off the alignment in yellow. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: North Overland Ave Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.5 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 10-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 2,000 LF 170 $ 340,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 2,400 LF 165 $ 396,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 4 EA 12,800 $ 52,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 8,500 $ 17,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 73 EA 5,000 $ 365,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 1,550 LF 115 $ 179,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,400 LF 21 $ 51,000 $ Concrete Surface Repair 450 LF 416 $ 188,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 4,400 LF 11 $ 49,000 $ 1,637,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $164,000 $1,801,000 Contingency 30% $540,000 $2,341,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $351,000 $2,692,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $673,000 $ 3,365,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: North Overland Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. • - Alley between Albion and Overland has a concrete surface, consider alternative surface repair to reduce project cost. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Overland Shopping Center Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.6 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 3,200 LF 175 $ 560,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 1,500 LF 165 $ 248,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 12,800 $ 39,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 9 EA 8,500 $ 77,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 4,300 $ 5,000 $ Boring (18" Casing) 100 LF 1,500 $ 150,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 37 EA 5,000 $ 185,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 1,950 LF 115 $ 225,000 $ HWY Repair - full lane 2,100 LF 150 $ 315,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 350 LF 21 $ 8,000 $ Sod Surface Repair 300 LF 35 $ 11,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 4,700 LF 11 $ 52,000 $ 1,875,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $188,000 $2,063,000 Contingency 30% $619,000 $2,682,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $402,000 $3,084,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $771,000 $ 3,855,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Overland Ave and W 21st Street Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Includes replacement and crossing in ITD ROW. • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: East Railroad Ave Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.7 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 4,100 LF 165 $ 677,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 12,800 $ 13,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 8,500 $ 26,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 6 EA 4,300 $ 26,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 39 EA 5,000 $ 195,000 $ Concrete Surface Repair 400 LF 416 $ 167,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 1,510 LF 115 $ 174,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,190 LF 21 $ 46,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 4,100 LF 11 $ 46,000 $ 1,370,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $137,000 $1,507,000 Contingency 30% $452,000 $1,959,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $294,000 $2,253,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $563,000 $ 2,816,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: East Railroad Ave / Albion Ave / Hansen Ave / Normal Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: South Overland Ave Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.8 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 3,650 LF 175 $ 639,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 1,350 LF 165 $ 223,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 12,800 $ 39,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 5 EA 8,500 $ 43,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 139 EA 5,000 $ 695,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 980 LF 115 $ 113,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 4,020 LF 21 $ 85,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 5,000 LF 11 $ 55,000 $ 1,892,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $189,000 $2,081,000 Contingency 30% $624,000 $2,705,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $406,000 $3,111,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $778,000 $ 3,889,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Oakley Ave / Overland Ave / Albion Ave / Hansen Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. • - Coordinate with nearby school schedule. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Miller and Oakley Ave Alley Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.9 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 3,700 LF 165 $ 611,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 12,800 $ 13,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 4 EA 8,500 $ 34,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 4 EA 4,300 $ 18,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 73 EA 5,000 $ 365,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 1,200 LF 115 $ 138,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,050 LF 21 $ 44,000 $ Sod Surface Repair 450 LF 35 $ 16,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 3,700 LF 11 $ 41,000 $ 1,280,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $128,000 $1,408,000 Contingency 30% $422,000 $1,830,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $275,000 $2,105,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $526,000 $ 2,631,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Miller Ave / Oakley Ave / W Railroad Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing commercial and residential area that does not meet the fire flow goals of 2,500 and 1,000 gpm, respectively. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for commercial areas and 1,000 gpm for existing residential areas. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Hiland Ave Subdivision Waterline Addition Project Identifier: 3.10 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 180 LF 215 $ 39,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 16,640 $ 17,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 11,050 $ 12,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 180 LF 150 $ 27,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 180 LF 14 $ 3,000 $ 98,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $10,000 $108,000 Contingency 30% $32,000 $140,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $21,000 $161,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 50% $81,000 $ 242,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Berkeley Ave and Hiland Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This area did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this area. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. • - Consider completing this project with a larger project to realise benefit from a mobolized contractor. • - Unit prices were increased by 30%, to account for higher costs associated with small projects. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: E 16th Street Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 3.11 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 12-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 5,100 LF 175 $ 893,000 $ 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 450 LF 165 $ 75,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 12,800 $ 13,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 8 EA 8,500 $ 68,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 20 EA 5,000 $ 100,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 5,550 LF 115 $ 639,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 5,550 LF 11 $ 62,000 $ 1,850,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $185,000 $2,035,000 Contingency 30% $611,000 $2,646,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $397,000 $3,043,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $761,000 $ 3,804,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: E 16th Street and Hiland Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing commercial and residential area that does not meet the fire flow goals of 2,500 and 1,000 gpm, respectively. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for commercial areas and 1,000 gpm for existing residential areas. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents and hospital. • - Coordinate with hospital access and service. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Water Master Plan Update Project Identifier: 4.1 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) Water Master Plan Update 1 LS 250,000 $ 250,000 $ $ 250,000 Location: Burley, Idaho Total Project Costs (rounded) Need for Project: • At the start of the Priority 2 improvements timeline, the current water master plan will be approximately 15 years old and the system should be re-evaluated. Objective: • Update planning criteria, identify existing and future water system needs, and develop an updated CIP. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Elba and Malta Ave Alley Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 4.2 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 2,900 LF 165 $ 479,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 8,500 $ 26,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 5 EA 4,300 $ 22,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 93 EA 5,000 $ 465,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 240 LF 115 $ 28,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,660 LF 21 $ 56,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 2,900 LF 11 $ 32,000 $ 1,108,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $111,000 $1,219,000 Contingency 30% $366,000 $1,585,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $238,000 $1,823,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $456,000 $ 2,279,000 Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Location: Elba and Malta Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing commercial and residential area that does not meet the fire flow goals of 2,500 and 1,000 gpm, respectively. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for commercial areas and 1,000 gpm for existing residential areas. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. • - Unit prices were increased by 30%, to account for higher costs associated with small projects. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Syringa Plaza Apartments Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 4.3 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 2,550 LF 165 $ 421,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 12,800 $ 26,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 4 EA 8,500 $ 34,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 4 EA 4,300 $ 18,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 23 EA 5,000 $ 115,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 1,030 LF 115 $ 119,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 870 LF 21 $ 19,000 $ Sod Surface Repair 650 LF 35 $ 23,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 2,550 LF 11 $ 29,000 $ 804,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $80,000 $884,000 Contingency 30% $265,000 $1,149,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $172,000 $1,321,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $330,000 $ 1,651,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Normal Ave / Almo Ave / Elba Ave / Oriental Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing commercial and residential area that does not meet the fire flow goals of 2,500 and 1,000 gpm, respectively. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for commercial areas and 1,000 gpm for existing residential areas. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Occidental, Yale, Schodde Alley Waterline Replacment Project Identifier: 4.4 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 5,500 LF 165 $ 908,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 5 EA 12,800 $ 64,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 5 EA 8,500 $ 43,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 6 EA 4,300 $ 26,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 125 EA 5,000 $ 625,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 600 LF 115 $ 69,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 4,900 LF 21 $ 103,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 5,500 LF 11 $ 61,000 $ 1,899,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $190,000 $2,089,000 Contingency 30% $627,000 $2,716,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $407,000 $3,123,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $781,000 $ 3,904,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Occidental Ave / Yale Ave / Schodde Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing commercial and residential area that does not meet the fire flow goals of 2,500 and 1,000 gpm, respectively. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for commercial areas and 1,000 gpm for existing residential areas. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: E 3rd Street Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 4.5 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 10-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 680 LF 221 $ 151,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 16,640 $ 17,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 11,050 $ 12,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 1 EA 6,500 $ 7,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 680 LF 150 $ 102,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 680 LF 14 $ 10,000 $ 299,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $30,000 $329,000 Contingency 30% $99,000 $428,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $64,000 $492,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 40% $197,000 $ 689,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: E 3rd Street and Overland Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is a commercial area that did not meet the fire flow goal of 2,500 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 2,500 gpm for this commercial area. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. • - Unit prices were increased by 30%, to account for higher costs associated with small projects. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Burton and Conant From 13th to 16th Street Alley Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 4.6 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 3,400 LF 165 $ 561,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 5 EA 12,800 $ 64,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 8,500 $ 9,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 88 EA 5,000 $ 440,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 820 LF 115 $ 95,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,150 LF 21 $ 46,000 $ Sod Surface Repair 430 LF 35 $ 16,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 3,400 LF 11 $ 38,000 $ 1,269,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $127,000 $1,396,000 Contingency 30% $419,000 $1,815,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $272,000 $2,087,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $522,000 $ 2,609,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Burton Ave / Conant Ave / Miller Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing residential area that does not meet the fire flowgoal of 1,000 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 1,000 gpm for this existing residential area. Design Considerations: • - Coordination with the park. • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Burton and Conant from 5th to 9th Street Alley Waterline Replacment Project Identifier: 4.7 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 3,100 LF 165 $ 512,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 12,800 $ 13,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 1 EA 8,500 $ 9,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 4,300 $ 9,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 77 EA 5,000 $ 385,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 320 LF 115 $ 37,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 2,780 LF 21 $ 59,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 3,100 LF 11 $ 35,000 $ 1,059,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $106,000 $1,165,000 Contingency 30% $350,000 $1,515,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $227,000 $1,742,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $436,000 $ 2,178,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Burton Ave / Conant Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing residential area that does not meet the fire flowgoal of 1,000 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 1,000 gpm for this existing residential area. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Hansen and Normal Alley Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 4.8 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 4,900 LF 165 $ 809,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (14") 2 EA 15,000 $ 30,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 12,800 $ 39,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 2 EA 8,500 $ 17,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 4,300 $ 13,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 143 EA 5,000 $ 715,000 $ Concrete Surface Repair 100 LF 416 $ 42,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 680 LF 115 $ 79,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 4,120 LF 21 $ 87,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 4,900 LF 11 $ 54,000 $ 1,885,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $189,000 $2,074,000 Contingency 30% $622,000 $2,696,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $404,000 $3,100,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $775,000 $ 3,875,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Hansen Ave / Normal Ave / Almo Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing residential area that does not meet the fire flowgoal of 1,000 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 1,000 gpm for this existing residential area. Design Considerations: • - Coordinate with nearby school schedule. • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232-001 Project Title: Burton, Conant, and Miller from 16th to 21st Street Alley Waterline Replacement Project Identifier: 4.9 General Line Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost (Rounded) Total Cost (2025 Dollars) 8-inch PVC Pipe - Excavation, Backfill, Valves, Hydrants, Fittings 4,900 LF 165 $ 809,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main (10" & 12", Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 12,800 $ 39,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main & Tapping Saddle and Valve) 6 EA 8,500 $ 51,000 $ Connect to Existing Water Main and Smaller, Tapping Saddle and Valve) 3 EA 4,300 $ 13,000 $ Reconnect Services (existing) 135 EA 5,000 $ 675,000 $ Full lane (12') Pavement Repair 480 LF 115 $ 56,000 $ Gravel Road Repair (Trench Width - 4,420 LF 21 $ 93,000 $ Existing Utility Protection & Coordination 4,900 LF 11 $ 54,000 $ 1,790,000 $ Mobilization and General Conditions 10% $179,000 $1,969,000 Contingency 30% $591,000 $2,560,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15% $384,000 $2,944,000 Plans and Contract Documents Design, Legal, and Construction Services 25% $736,000 $ 3,680,000 Subtotal Total Construction Subtotal Total Project Costs (rounded) Subtotal Location: Burton Ave / Conant Ave / Miller Ave / Oakley Ave Construction Subtotal Additional Elements Need for Project: • This is an existing residential area that does not meet the fire flowgoal of 1,000 gpm. Objective: • Replace undersized lines and provide a minimum of 1,000 gpm for this existing residential area. Design Considerations: • - Maintain service to residents. The cost estimate herein is concept level information only based on our perception of current conditions at the project location and its accuracy is subject to significant variation depending upon project definition and other factors. This estimate reflects our opinion of probable costs at this time and is subject to change as the project design matures. This cost opinion is in 2025 dollars and does not include escalation to time of actual construction. Keller Associates has no control over variances in the cost of labor, materials, equipment, services provided by others, contractor's methods of determining prices, competitive bidding or market conditions, practices or bidding strategies. Keller Associates cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from the cost presented herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX N Annual Replacement Budgets Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Water Distribution System Annual Replacement Budget Summary Category Annual Budget2 Water Meters 149,000 $ Fire Hydrants 240,000 $ Well Facilities 525,000 $ Booster Stations 338,000 $ Storage Tanks 135,000 $ Subtotal 1,387,000 $ Pipeline Replacements1 2,832,000 $ Total Annual Replacement Budget 4,219,000 $ Annual Replacement Budget Summary 1) Assumes replacing 1% of the system is replaced every year. 2) Mobilization, contingency, professional engineering fees are included for well facilities, booster stations, storage tanks, and pipeline replacements. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Water Meter Annual Replacement Budget Meter Size Meter Cost Transmistter Cost Labor Hours Total Cost1 3/4 Inch 174 $ 223 $ 2 557 $ 1 Inch 233 $ 223 $ 2 616 $ 1-1/2 Inch 1,698 $ 223 $ 4 2,241 $ 2 Inch 1,880 $ 223 $ 4 2,423 $ 3 Inch 2,280 $ 223 $ 4 2,823 $ 4 Inch 4,111 $ 223 $ 4 4,654 $ 6 Inch 6,841 $ 223 $ 4 7,384 $ 8 Inch 10,500 $ 223 $ 4 11,043 $ Meter Replacement Size Frequency (years) Price Quantity Cost/Year 3/4 Inch 20 557 $ 2,836 78,983 $ 1 Inch 20 616 $ 1,212 37,330 $ 1-1/2 Inch 20 2,241 $ 81 9,076 $ 2 Inch 20 2,423 $ 122 14,780 $ 3 Inch 20 2,823 $ 14 1,976 $ 4 Inch 20 4,654 $ 13 3,025 $ 6 Inch 20 7,384 $ 7 2,584 $ 8 Inch 20 11,043 $ 2 1,104 $ 149,000 $ 1) Labor Rate was assumed to be $80/hour. Total Annual Replacement Budget (Rounded) Water Meter Annual Replacement Budget 2) Labor hours were assumed to include two laborers. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Fire Hydrant Annual Replacement Budget Total Number of Hydrants 560 Typical Life (years) 50 Hydrants replaced per year 12 Typical cost/Hydrants1 20,000 $ Total Annual Replacement Budget (Rounded) 240,000 $ Fire Hydrant Annual Replacement Budget 1) Hydrant cost includes hydrant, 3 valves, 1 fitting, 6-inch pipe and labor cost. Labor cost include 16 hours for 3 employees with an hourly rate of $80/hr. Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Well Facility Annual Replacement Budget Well Number Reported Capacity 2023 (gpm) Pump Horsepower (hp) Backup Power Well 2 1,300 200 No Well 3 1,000 200 No Well 4 1,100 150 Yes Well 5 1,860 250 Yes Well 6 2,080 250 No Well 7 3,890 600 Yes Item Count Sites 6 Wells 6 Large Pump / Motor (>100 hp) 6 Generator 3 Typical Replacement Activities Frequency (years) Price Quantity Cost/year Building 50 333,200 $ 3 19,992 $ Site Paving, Fencing, Etc. 30 109,650 $ 3 10,965 $ Plumbing / Mechanical 30 250,000 $ 6 50,000 $ Yard Piping 80 183,000 $ 6 13,725 $ Electrical 30 164,900 $ 6 32,980 $ HVAC 20 66,300 $ 6 19,890 $ Pump and Motor 100 hp) 25 250,000 $ 6 60,000 $ Generator 30 115,000 $ 3 11,500 $ Controls 20 60,350 $ 6 18,105 $ Chlorine Treatment 10 91,800 $ 6 55,080 $ 293,000 $ 10% 30,000 $ - 323,000 $ 30% 97,000 $ - 420,000 $ 25% 105,000 $ 525,000 $ 1. Well 4, 5, and 7's building and site replacement costs are included in the Booster Station budget. Annual Replacement Subtotal (Rounded) Total Annual Replacement Budget (Rounded) Mobilization Subtotal Contingency Construction Cost Engineering, CMS, Legal, & Admin Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Booster Station Annual Replacement Budget Very Small <200 gpm Small 200-500 gpm Medium 500-2,000 gpm Large 2,000+ gpm Booster Station Location Pumps (HP & gpm) Total Pumping Capacity (gpm) Pump Size Booster Station Size 15 HP (220 gpm) Small 25 HP (410 gpm) Small 32 HP (800 gpm) Small 137 HP (3,250 gpm) Large 40 HP (725 gpm) Medium 250 HP (4,700 gpm) Large 200 HP (3,500 gpm) Large 50 HP (825 gpm) Medium 200 HP (3,120 gpm) Large 200 HP (3,120 gpm) Large Typical Replacement Activities Frequency (years) Price Quantity1 Cost/year Building 50 381,650 $ 3 22,899 $ Site Paving, Fencing, Etc. 30 209,950 $ 3 20,995 $ Plumbing / Mechanical 30 315,000 $ 3 31,500 $ Yard Piping 80 215,000 $ 3 8,063 $ Electrical 30 268,600 $ 3 26,860 $ HVAC 20 126,000 $ 3 18,900 $ Pumps and Motors 25 288,000 $ 3 34,560 $ Generator 30 115,000 $ 3 11,500 $ Controls 25 98,600 $ 3 11,832 $ 188,000 $ 10% 19,000 $ - 207,000 $ 30% 63,000 $ - 270,000 $ 25% 68,000 $ 338,000 $ Large 4,680 Large Large Pump and Booster Station Criteria Hiland Ave and Sandy Glen Ln Booster Station 4 4th N St and Overland Ave 8,925 Booster Station 7 Hiland Ave and E Main St 7,065 Booster Station 5 Annual Replacement Subtotal (Rounded) Total Annual Replacement Budget (Rounded) Mobilization Subtotal Contingency Construction Cost Engineering, CMS, Legal, & Admin Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Storage Tank Annual Replacement Budget Very Small 25k gal Small 26k - 100k gal Medium 101k - 500k gal Large 500k+ gal Storage Tank Volume (gal) Size Type Tank 4 750,000 Large Welded Steel Tank 5 2,000,000 Large Concrete Tank 7 2,000,000 Large Welded Steel Typical Replacement Activities Frequency (years) Price Quantity Cost/year Hatch 30 22,000 $ 3 2,200 $ Vent 30 9,000 $ 3 900 $ Ladder 30 14,000 $ 3 1,400 $ Site, Paving, Fencing, etc. 30 150,000 $ 3 15,000 $ Inspection / Clean 7 16,000 $ 3 6,858 $ Level Sensor 15 14,000 $ 3 2,800 $ Interior Coating 20 293,000 $ 2 29,300 $ Exterior Coating 30 234,000 $ 2 15,600 $ 75,000 $ 10% 8,000 $ - 83,000 $ 30% 25,000 $ - 108,000 $ 25% 27,000 $ 135,000 $ Storage Tank Criteria Construction Cost Engineering, CMS, Legal, & Admin Total Annual Replacement Budget (Rounded) Annual Replacement Subtotal (Rounded) Mobilization Subtotal Contingency Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Alternative Pipeline Replacement Budget Summary Alternative Description Length / Year (LF) Cost / Year (Millions) 1 Replace 1% of system per year (assumes a useful life of 100 years) 4,346 2.83 2 Replace 0.5% of system per year (assumes a useful life of 200 years) 2,173 1.42 3 Replace all non-plastic pipe smaller than 8-inches pipe within 50 years 1,817 1.21 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Client: City of Burley Project: Water Master Plan Project No.: 221232 Pipeline Replacement Budget Option 1 Pipe Diameter Length 1% of Total length Total Pipeline Road Repair Total Installed Cost (in) (ft)5 (ft)1 Cost (per LF)2 Cost (per LF)3 (per LF)4 ≤4 90,850 909 292 $ 81 $ 10% 30% 534 $ 25% 668 $ 606,424 $ 6 157,300 1,573 292 $ 81 $ 10% 30% 534 $ 25% 668 $ 1,049,978 $ 8 77,450 775 292 $ 81 $ 10% 30% 534 $ 25% 668 $ 516,979 $ 10 51,000 510 249 $ 81 $ 10% 30% 472 $ 25% 590 $ 300,900 $ 12 42,950 430 255 $ 81 $ 10% 30% 481 $ 25% 601 $ 258,237 $ 14 4,400 44 253 $ 81 $ 10% 30% 478 $ 25% 598 $ 26,290 $ 16 10,650 107 305 $ 81 $ 10% 30% 552 $ 25% 690 $ 73,485 $ Total 434,600 4,346 2,832,000 $ Distribution System 1% Replacement Budget 2) Assumes pipes smaller than 8-inches are replaced with 8-inch pipe, and the cost includes PVC pipe, excavation, bedding, backfill, fittings, valves, hydrants, and services. 4) Total installed cost includes construction and professional engineering. 3) Total construction costs include installed pipe cost, road repair (12 foot width), mobilization, and contingency. Road repair assumes one third of the pipeline replacements are completed with roadway projects. Professional Engineering Contingency Total Construction Costs (per LF)3 1.0% of System Cost Mobilization 1) Assumes a useful life of pipeline is 100 years and 1% of the system is replaced every year. Total Annual Pipeline Replacement Budget (Rounded) Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX O Letter from Local Fire Authority Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- Burley Fire Department Casey Harman Deputy Fire Chief 1235 Miller Ave. Burley, ID 83318 [EMAIL REDACTED] Phone: 1-[PHONE REDACTED] To whom it may concern, We have reviewed the following fire flow criteria that is proposed to be used for the water system evaluation in the latest Water Master Plan. 1. Existing Residentially Zoned Areas – 1,000 gpm for 2 hours 2. Future Residentially Zoned Areas – 1,500 gpm for 2 hours 3. Commercially Zoned Areas – 2,500 gpm for 3 hours 4. Industrial Zoned Areas – 3,500 gpm for 4 hours 5. Existing Industries - Pacific Ethanol and DOT Foods – 4,500 gpm for 4 hours For the purpose of water system design, we agree with the application of these general fire flow demands to currently undeveloped areas that are zoned as listed. That being said, as projects occur and areas are developed, each development will be measured versus the standards listed in the 2018 International Fire Code. Multiple variables based on construction type, square footage and presence of suppression systems, will affect the final determination of a project’s required fire flow. If you have any questions or need further information do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Casey Harman Deputy Fire Chief Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE ---PAGE BREAK--- 100 E Bower St., Suite 110 I Meridian, ID 83642 I (208) 288-1992 Docusign Envelope ID: 75F65CC6-E44A-45E4-8203-151C8A397EDE