Document Belgrade_doc_e35fc6b67e

Master Plan 2025 Defining a unified vision for our future. www.beheardbelgrade.com [PHONE REDACTED] beheardbelgrade.com 91 East Central Avenue Belgrade, MT 59714 ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN ii Ryen Glenn Pavillion ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN iii City of Belgrade Staff Hayden Caligiuri, Planner Neil Cardwell, City Manager Jason Karp, Community Development Director Steve Klotz, Belgrade Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District Director Levi Simonson, GIS Brad Stein, Senior Planner Greg Tryon, Assistant City Manager Camaree Uljua, Director of Public Works Belgrade Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District Board Joe Bernhardt, County Representative Alex Cady, City Representative Emily Decker, City Representative Renae Mattimoe, Ex-Officio Diana Perry, City Representative Jamie Rosemary, County Representative Clint Steadman, County Representative Gallatin County Commission City of Belgrade City Council Consultants Cushing Terrell 411 E Main St #101 Bozeman, MT 59715 Community Thank you to all the community members who participated in engagement events and contributed their ideas to the 2025 Belgrade Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District Master Plan. Special thanks to those who shared their thoughts and ideas online, participated in meetings, and attended the open houses, both virtually and in person. Acknowledgements ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN iv Adoption ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN v Dear Community Members, The Gallatin Valley, a region of stunning natural beauty, has long been a haven for outdoor enthusiasts. Recognizing the importance of preserving outdoor spaces and recreational opportunities, the residents of the extended Belgrade community took a significant step in 2023 by voting to establish a regional parks, trails, and recreation district. This visionary decision created a district encompassing 242 square miles, offering a diverse range of recreational opportunities for both residents and visitors. With this new district comes the exciting opportunity to shape the future of outdoor recreation and public spaces in the region. To ensure that the District meets the evolving needs and aspirations of the community, a comprehensive master planning process was initiated. This collaborative effort involved extensive public input, with residents sharing their ideas and priorities through in- person meetings, virtual gatherings, and online surveys. The valuable insights gained from this process have been instrumental in shaping the District's goals and guiding the development of its master plan. We are grateful for the time and dedication of community members who participated in this process. Your input has been instrumental in shaping the future of the Belgrade Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District. It is our hope that this district will provide lasting benefits to the community, promoting health, wellness, and environmental stewardship for generations to come. Sincerely, Belgrade Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District Board Letter from the Board ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN vi Executive Master Plan District Establishment and A. District Background, Purpose, B. District Governing Structure, Funding, and Administration������������24 Facilities Inventory and A. Existing Conditions Assessment B. Park Classifications and C. Equity D. Places and Facilities E. Pathways F. Minimum Park Requirements G. Facilities Maintenance Standards and Maintenance H. Priorities For Facility Improvements and I. Recreation and Wellness Best J. Recreation and Wellness Trends Operations and Capital Improvement Planning A. Capital Improvement Assessment B. District Capital Improvement Plan Programming and A. Programming Inventory and Core B. External Use and Event Guidelines for Park and Facility Rentals���74 C. Park and Facility D. Programming Partnerships and Governance and A. Staff Position B. Engagement C. Park District Board Implementation Action Plan and Capital Project A. Implementation Action B. Capital Project Appendix Table Of Contents 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 ---PAGE BREAK--- vii BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN ---PAGE BREAK--- 8 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Executive Summary 01 BACKGROUND Encompassing 242 square miles, the Belgrade Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District, (District), includes everything you would expect in the beautiful State of Montana. From mountain tops, to a quaint main street and everything in between, the District sits within Gallatin County in the heart of the scenic Rocky Mountains and offers a wide range of unique experiences. Given it’s natural beauty, there is no question why so many people choose to live and recreate here. Gallatin County is one of the most populated and one of the fastest growing counties in southwest Montana and Belgrade is one of the fastest growing cities in the state. With this large influx of recent growth and more projected, the development of the Districts’ first Master Plan, is a critical first step to ensure the quality, quantity, and diversity of recreation amenities keeps up with the pace of growth. With the recent establishment of the District by voters in 2023, the District is still in its infancy. Prior to the development of this Master Plan, in 2020, the City of Belgrade adopted a Parks Master Plan of it's own which provided recommendations for parks, recreation, programming, and trails within the City. Much has changed within the city since then and with the addition of unincorporated area into the District, a new plan was needed. The 2025 Master Plan is a visionary and aspirational document intended to capture what District residents want, create a path for bringing these desires to fruition, and serve as a road map for decision makers and leaders. ---PAGE BREAK--- DRY CREEK RD SPRINGHILL RD JACKRABBIT LN RIVER RD FRONTAGE RD AMSTERDAM RD THORPE RD BAXTER LANE BOZEMAN BELGRADE MANHATTAN ROCKY MOUNTAIN ROAD MAIN ST E VALLEY CENTER RD REESE CREEK ROAD LINNEY RD PENWELL BRIDGE ROAD ALASKA RD S CAMERON BRIDGE WEST RD AIRWAY BLVD MCILHATTEN RD AIRPORT ROAD FRONTAGE RD 0 1 2 3 4 ½ Miles Legend District Park Spaces District Boundary Roads Municipal Boundaries Belgrade City Limits Major Streets Forest Service Trails Waterways Park District ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 10 OPPORTUNITY Create opportunities for high-quality parks and recreation facilities to improve and maintain the user experience PLANNING Provide for current and future generations through public outreach, partnerships, and strategic planning. INNOVATION Create high-quality parks, trails, and recreational opportunities around the needs of residents and families that reside in the District. CONNECTION Foster opportunities for social connections by implementing and maintaining an interconnected network of trails, parks, and destinations, and recreational opportunities. ACCESSIBILITY AND EQUALITY Provide recreational opportunities to all areas of the District that support the inclusion of district residents regardless of limitations. TRANSPARENCY Prioritize quality in our programs and accountability in our fiscal management to provide excellent and affordable recreation that inspires everyone to enjoy. ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS To better understand the community desires, an extensive community engagement process was conducted and informed many of the plan recommendations. Key themes and findings from the community include: PLACES AND FACILITIES • The development of a large community park and Aquatic and Recreation Center remain top priorities. • Flexible recreational facilities and sporting fields are desired. PATHWAYS • More safe active mobility connections between parks, facilities, and other district destinations are desired. • New, broader pathway connections throughout the District are desired but must respect private property boundaries. MASTER PLAN MISSION, VISION, AND VALUES MISSION What does the Master Plan do? Through the Master Plan, we strive to improve the quality of life of district residents through offering a variety of park, trail, and recreation opportunities to the community, including fully developed parks. VISION What does the Master Plan want? The Master Plan wants all residents to have access to open outdoor spaces and participate in recreation. VALUES What does the Master Plan value? ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 11 PROGRAMMING • More family-friendly, year-round, community-wide events and festivals are desired that serve all age groups – particularly youth and seniors. • Affordable programs that promote health and wellness are highly desired such as classes, lessons, camps, and swim lessons. ADMINISTRATION • Guidance and/or regulation addressing improper use or behaviors at parks, trails, and facilities is desired. • Preservation of open space and ecological sensitivity should be considered by the District as it makes future plans. BENCHMARK FINDINGS In addition to community findings, the existing District amenities were compared to the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) benchmarks. NRPA is the leading non-profit organization dedicated to building strong, vibrant, and resilient communities through the power of parks and recreation. Annually, NRPA releases an Agency Performance Review surveying Park and Recreation Agencies about existing amenities, programming, and other pertinent data within the Park and Recreation industry. Utilizing the 2024 report, which included input from nearly 1,000 Park and Recreation Agencies across the country from 2021 to 2023, an existing level of service analysis is provided in the Master Plan for reference. While this analysis offers insight compared to a national average, the unique nature and location of the District does justify special consideration. Nonetheless, it provides a valuable benchmark for the District and should be considered. To complete the analysis, the team used an approximate District population. The District population was estimated to be 26,379 in 2022. This estimate was used to gauge whether the District was meeting, exceeding, or lagging the national NRPA benchmark levels. With the current projection for large population growth in the District, particularly inside the City of Belgrade, the level of services will continue to trend down without the addition of new park areas, amenities and facilities. Additionally, parks inside and outside the City of Belgrade were included in this analysis and it was found that City Parks, although substantially smaller on average, offer significantly more developed amenities. Below is a summary of how existing District park and recreation facilities compare to NRPA benchmarks: OUTDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY BENCHMARKS EXCEEDS BENCHMARK • Playgrounds • Multi-use courts (tennis/pickleball) • Basketball courts • Ice rinks ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 12 MEETS BENCHMARK • Dog parks • Skateboard parks • Splash pads LAGS BENCHMARK • Diamond fields • Rectangular fields • Walking loops/ Running tracks INDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY BENCHMARKS EXCEEDS BENCHMARK • None identified from relevant facilities MEETS BENCHMARK • Performance amphitheaters (indoor or outdoor) LAGS BENCHMARK • Recreation Center • Aquatic Center • Stadiums • Teen Center PATHWAY BENCHMARKS NRPA pathway data combines trails, greenways, and other outdoor walking areas for community members. A typical park and recreation agency is responsible for managing 16 miles of trails for communities between 20,000 to 49,999 in population. The District currently owns and maintains one short recreational pathway segment near Sunnyside Park and I-90. Other recreational pathways within the District are owned and maintained by Home Owners Association's (HOA). In total there is 8.21 miles of pathways owned and maintain by HOA's and the District. In addition there is 56.9 miles of trails on the west side of the Bridger Range that are owned and maintained by the USFS. PROGRAMMING BENCHMARKS Currently, the District does not offer any recreational programs, but District facilities are used for events and recreation programs run by other organizations. There is public support for the creation of District sponsored recreational programming, however, some of the facilities required to support these programs do not yet exist. According to NRPA, the top five programs offered by park and recreation agencies nationwide include: • Themed special events • Social recreation events • Team sports • Fitness enhancement classes • Health and wellness education ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 13 RECOMMENDATIONS All Master Plan recommendations are based on the Park Space Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. Recommendations are organized into three categories: Facilities; Programming; and Administration. FACILITIES Facilities are foundational to any park and recreation district. Effort to capture and inventory of all facilities that exist within the District, regardless of ownership and maintenance responsibility, will serve the District well. For the first time, information was compiled to understand what recreation facilities exist in the District, both inside and outside the City of Belgrade. This information provides valuable insight into existing District conditions and ultimately contributes to park equity. Some gaps in park coverage across the District were observed and it should be noted that some of these locations are unsuitable for park development due to existing land uses like airports, highways and gravel pits. Further analysis of District facilities, specifically those that exist outside city limits, and the role the District plays within these areas, and park equity should continue to be studied. Given the significant land development pressure occurring in the District, procuring land for future parks and pathways will continue to become more challenging and more expensive. It is recommended that the District be proactive about acquiring large tracts of land (should attractive terms and pricing exist) that could accommodate the large recreation facilities Aquatic and Recreation Center, Regional Park, etc.). The District should prioritize the creation of a donation program. A donation program can provide many creative opportunities for the District to expand recreation opportunities and if done well, can create a reliable revenue source. In addition to revenue, a donation program may also create opportunities for the District to acquire land, conservation easements, sponsorships, or maintenance assistance. As the District population grows and land is subdivided for residential development, Master Plan goals and recommendations should be integrated into development application review to ensure that new parks are developed in alignment with District priorities. The most effective way to ensure this is done is to implement a set of minimum park standards. Land within the District crosses many jurisdictional boundaries. As such, the District should focus on creating partnerships at local, state, and federal levels and allied organizations to capitalize on existing programs and improve project success through shared resources and knowledge. Additional studies, planning, and conceptual design efforts are also recommended. Investing in topic specific planning can improve resident support, create a sense of ownership and pride and improve decision making transparency. Specifically, this Master Plan recommends prioritizing the creation of a District-wide recreational trails master plan, a wayfinding and signage master plan, and park specific master plans for all major District parks. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 14 To streamline facility maintenance and respond to the increase in demand, effort should be made to create and formalize a routine maintenance program. Once all existing space and facility obligations have been identified, creation of maintenance schedules, standards, and staffing responsibilities is recommended. Several cost saving recommendations include utilizing a work order management system to improve efficiency and periodically evaluating in-house versus outsourcing tasks. PROGRAMMING When examining community feedback on desired programs along with NRPA benchmarks, the two most significant facilities missing from the District is an aquatic center and a recreation center. Although the aquatic center is a long-standing desire within the community, a recreation center will also create the opportunity for significant programming options that the District is currently missing. It is recommended that these facilities be studied as a joint facility to create construction and building efficiencies. District sponsored recreation programs are widely supported by residents. Careful consideration of which programs to pursue is critical and it is recommended that the District spend time to create a Core Program list. Additionally, analyzing cost recovery and understanding the full cost of running a program is imperative to ensure financial success. Once a program is established it is recommended that the District create an online platform that allows users to easily sign up for programs, events, and rentals. ADMINISTRATION As the complexity and quantity of decisions increase, the District should continue to define Board roles and responsibilities. It is also recommended that the Board adopt a schedule for master plan updates. Regular updates ensure that goals and recommendations stay in line with community expectations and needs. Typically, master plans are updated every 5-10 years. When the District increases the number and variety of spaces under its care, ensuring that the facilities are maintained, and program needs are met will continue to increase in complexity. Creating a team of professionals, each with their own area of expertise, will be a key component to District success. Below are several positions to consider adding to the District team as growth occurs. • Facility Coordinator/Permit Officer • Grant Writer/Contract Manager • Facilities Manager (Building and indoor court maintenance) • Grounds Maintenance Manager (landscape and outdoor field maintenance) • Recreation Program Manager • Communication Manager • Park Planner/Landscape Architect • Specialty: Aquatics, Naturalist, Trails and Arborist ---PAGE BREAK--- Sprayground at Lewis and Clark Park 15 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN ---PAGE BREAK--- 16 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN A. Master Plan Purpose In 2023, voters approved a referendum to create a Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District that would generate funding for park, trail, and recreation facilities and programs. For the first time, residents have a unified voice to develop, improve and maintain recreation spaces, facilities and programs in and surrounding Belgrade. The purpose of this Master Plan is to capture what is most important to District residents and to establish a baseline for future decision making. Efforts to complete an inventory of existing recreational facilities, spaces, and programming will provide the District and the Board with an understanding of how residents recreate within the District, what facilities will benefit the most residents, what improvements are needed, and where. Combined with robust engagement, this information sets the foundation for the District future. Like any master plan, it’s important to remember that its content is meant to be aspirational, to imagine what is possible, and propose a path to achieve goals. The vision and goals captured in this plan represent a moment in time. As circumstances change, as needs evolve, the 2025 Master Plan may need to be adjusted. Perhaps most importantly, a master plan encourages consistency and ensures activities protect and preserve the character of the District as envisioned by residents. This Master Plan provides a reference point for the Board, Council, commissioners and staff in their decision-making processes and ensures that those decisions align with the public sentiment. Master Plan Approach 02 ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 17 B. Master Plan Goals MISSION What does the Master Plan do? Through the Master Plan, we strive to improve the quality of life of district residents through offering a variety of park, trail, and recreation opportunities to the community, including fully developed parks. VISION What does the Master Plan want? The Master Plan wants all residents to have access to outdoor spaces and participate in recreation. VALUES What does the Master Plan value? OPPORTUNITY Create opportunities for high-quality parks and recreation facilities to improve and maintain the user experience PLANNING Provide for current and future generations through public outreach, partnerships, and strategic planning. INNOVATION Create high-quality parks, trails, and recreational opportunities around the needs of residents and families that reside in the District. CONNECTION Foster opportunities for social connections by Implementing and maintaining an interconnected network of trails, parks, and destinations, and recreational opportunities. TRANSPARENCY Prioritize quality in our programs and accountability in our fiscal management to provide excellent and affordable recreation that inspires everyone to enjoy. ACCESSIBILITY AND EQUITY Provide recreational opportunities to all areas of the District that support the inclusion of District residents regardless of limitations. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 18 C. Master Plan Process, Outreach, and Engagement 1. ENGAGEMENT PROCESS AND STRATEGY The targeted engagement window began on February 20, 2024, with the launch of online tools, a survey and interactive map. Over a 6-month time period, District residents logged 100's of comments, reviewed the map and answered survey questions. Additional effort was made to reach local stakeholders and area recreation agency leaders. Small focus group virtual sessions and agency calls provided the team with added clarity and context around opportunities to improve recreation and what barriers exist. The engagement effort culminated with a second open house in October 2024 where over 40 participants gathered in the Belgrade Community Library to learn more about Master Plan recommendations. 2. ENGAGEMENT METHODS Community Open Houses Two community open houses were hosted during the project – one at the beginning of the project and one towards the end. The first open house gave attendees a broad understanding of the District, an overview of the master planning process, and engaged the community to express their recreational interests, priorities, desires, and concerns. The event also allowed attendees to meet the planning team and provide initial feedback on the District map. The second community open house focused on presenting findings and recommendations to the community. Attendees provided input on the recommendations and were also able to prioritize their favorite components during an interactive activity. Virtual Meeting An online meeting, Clearly Wednesday: Parks District, was hosted with the Belgrade Parks and Recreation Director, Steve Klotz, and the consultant team. The meeting provided District background, a project overview, and planning for the District. The meeting was a part of the broader virtual meeting series connected to the city's Clearly Belgrade Master Planning effort. Focus Groups The project team met with members of the community and agency partners to participate in guided discussions on various topics related to recreation in the District. Guests were invited to discuss topics like sports, indoor and outdoor recreation, fitness and wellness alongside broader discussions with organizations and local authorities. Project Website Project updates were made to the project website at BeHeardBelgrade.com which served as a resource for project information, background documents, and to provide link to engagement tools. Doorhangers 500 door hangers were distributed across portions of the City and County within the District providing a direct link residents for information about the project and the survey. Posters Several dozen posters were displayed at park sites and key community locations informing residents about the project and survey. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 19 3.ENGAGEMENT, BY THE NUMBERS The online survey and interactive map tools were made to the public available via the project website. What is your age? 20 - 29 Outside of the District 12 or under 46 - 65 30 - 45 In Gallatin County within the District 13 - 19 In the City of Belgrade 65+ Where do you live? Survey An online survey was conducted through the project website, targeting residents across the District. The survey captured what respondents wished to see in the District and collected input on future parks, trail networks, and recreation programs, as well as identified which projects should be prioritized over the next three years. Interactive Map An interactive, conceptual map for the District provided residents with a visioning exercise to imagine possibilities. Respondents were asked to share thoughts on the proposed improvements, conceptual trails, and/or identify new parks, trails, and recreation facilities they would like to see in the District! This input was hosted on the project webpage and collected by pins and comment options on the map. THEMES FROM THE ENGAGEMENT PHASE The following findings underscore the overall takeaways of the feedback received through the public engagement project phase. Over 750 data points through the project phase resulting in the following themes representing a collection across all sources; the most common open-ended response with data derived from the online survey and interactive map. These findings captured critical values from the community and, based on public feedback, directly guided the Master Pan's organization within these themes. Programs Engagement comments by theme Online Surveys, Interactive Maps, and Focus Groups were organized in similar topics across the sources. The responses are grouped into 6 categories and summarized in the below breakdown. Survey Respondent Profile Places and Facilities Connections N/A Other Admin Places and Facilities 238 Connections 164 Programs 73 Admin 33 Other 110 N/A 72 60.9% 58.2% 34% 16% 10% 24% 5% 11% 38.8% 3.0% 24.1% 6.7% 8.2% ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 20 Themes The following themes, informed by participants and respondents throughout the master plan engagement phase, create a framework to inform the consideration of projects, priorities, and best practices recommended through the master plan. Places Residents noted an overwhelming desire to expand, maintain, and/or create new spaces for the community to experience parks, dog parks, sports fields, recreation facilities and amenities, and open space. These included strong desires for the development of an aquatic facility and a larger community park/recreation center. Connections Connections refer to links between spaces and facilities in a safe, accessible, and convenient manner which were noted as important desires by respondents. These include opportunities to create new routes (trails, pathways, and/ or sidewalks) for residents to get to and from key community spaces, parks, facilities, and destinations. Programs Residents noted an interest in expanding, and creating a variety of programming, events, and partnerships that serve a diversity of interests throughout the District. These responses noted a desire for inclusive, family-friendly, offerings year-round that served all ages and abilities. Administration In addition to the service offerings of the District, responses shared a desire for equal interest noted for the implementation, management, and facilitation of programs, places, and connections that fall within the authority of the District. These include the creation and/ or enforcement of policies and guidelines considerations by district authorities. Other Residents offered a variety of feedback reflecting desires that crosscut many of the above themes or fall outside of the project scope but may inform more comprehensive plan recommendations. These include relevant information, process consideration, plan implementation, suggestions for best practices, and related comments beyond the responsibilities of the District. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 21 4. OPEN HOUSE #2 INVESTMENT ACTIVITY A primary engagement tool for Open House #2 was an interactive activity aimed to gather attendee feedback on priority projects using investment thinking. Residents were greeted at the introduction station, asked to sign in and then given five bills of fake currency. They were asked to visit each station, learn as much about the district as possible, consider recommendations at each station and then “invest” their currency in the recommendation that meant the most to them. Residents could either invest all of their money in one recommendation or divide their money across as many as five of their preferred recommendations. This exercise proved to be a fun way to get the public to recognize the varying degree of complexity and nuance needed to improve costly recreation projects. The following 201 votes reflect attendees' desired project investments across the District. PLACES AND FACILITIES CONNECTIONS PROGRAMS $ - Outdoor Stage 10 West Bridger 14 Sports and Recreation 10 - Multi-use Courts 1 Bozeman / Manhattan 41 Fitness and Wellbeing 7 - Aquatic Center 32 Central Belgrade 22 Arts, Education and Culture 14 - Large Regional Park 15 Gallatin River 21 Community Events 14 58 98 45 Activity Summary • In general, attendees were familiar with the District creation and scope. • Support for the large regional park which included active recreational fields was moderate but may have been overshadowed by the very high preference for the Aquatic Center. Moderate support was also received for sport field interest in the programming section. • In general, there is a high level of interest in pathway connections with the most interest in a connection between Bozeman and Manhattan. • Compared to other alternatives, participants were less interested in connections to the existing West Bridger trailheads • Participants did not voice a strong preference for one individual program area but the strongest preference was for arts, education, culture and community events Although responses, comments, and ideas were gathered through a variety of sources, capturing different perspectives from the community, Respondent's comments are generally aligned with the broad categories of places, connections, programs, and administration. Complete and detailed reports from the survey and other engagement methods utilized can be found in the Engagement Summary located in the Appendix. 55% 42% 31% 31% 22% 16% 23% 21% 14% 26% 17% 2% ---PAGE BREAK--- 22 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN A. District Background, Purpose, History Since completing the City of Belgrade Parks Master Plan, the community has shown continued interest in improving parks, trails, and recreation in the area. Rapid growth and an increasing population have only emphasized the need for strategic parks and recreation planning. In 2023, voters approved a referendum to create a District that would generate funds for park, trail, and recreation facilities and programs. District revenue will also fund staff and equipment for District maintenance. District Establishment and Future 03 ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 23 3. DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHICS Population by age Source: Census data: ACS 2022 5-year 35.9 years Median Age $87,273 Median household income $433,500 Median value of owner-occupied housing units 10,274 Number of Households 2.6 Persons per household 65.5% District Population not in labor force Race and Ethnicity 1. PURPOSE The purpose of the District is to provide park and recreation services and amenities including but not limited to: 1. Maintenance, repair, replacement, upkeep, installation, improvement, operational enhancement, construction, reconstruction, acquisition of land. 2. Development, financing, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of various parks and recreation improvements. 3. Implementation or measures required to maintain public health and safety or meet legal or regulatory requirements. 4. Purchasing, replace and/or maintaining equipment, tools, or vehicles used to carry out District functions. 5. Any other function, labor training, supplies and/or material necessary for management and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, lands, and equipment including but not limited to public playgrounds and parks, recreation facilities, trails, open space, urban forest, medians, boulevards, pathways, sidewalks, public easements, and other facilities located in the District. 2. LOCATION The District boundary follows the Belgrade School District #44 footprint, which encompasses the entire City of Belgrade and portions of the Gallatin River, East Gallatin River, and the Bridger Range in Gallatin County. The District covers 155,000 acres, or 242 square miles, of urban, agricultural, and natural open spaces. Under 18 25% 18 to 64 63% 65 and over 12% Under 18 18 to 64 65 and over 94.2% 0.1% 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.7% 1.7% 2.5% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% White Black Native Asian Islander Other Two of More Hispanic ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 24 B. District Governing Structure, Funding, and Administration The City of Belgrade and Gallatin County ordered a referendum to officially create the District on May 2, 2023. Shortly after, the City and the County entered into an Interlocal Agreement to outline the rights, duties, obligations and responsibilities for the establishment and administration of the District, and necessary improvements and services. The District has a broad responsibility for providing park and recreation services and amenities within the boundary. Notably, these services include maintenance and replacement of facilities, improvements and new development, acquisition of land, staffing and supplies, and general management of operations. The District is managed by the Belgrade Regional Park and Recreation Board of Directors (Board) and the City of Belgrade (City) is required to manage all staff, services and improvements. The Board is responsible for the governance of the District, subject to the direction and control of the Belgrade City Council and the Board of County Commissioners. The City is responsible for all day- to-day services required for the operation, improvements, and property maintenance utilizing services provided by the City through employees, agents and/or contractors. The City formed a Parks and Recreation Department to house staff that are responsible for day-to-day services and improvements for the District. Currently the Department is led by Director Steve Klotz. The Board is made up of seven members, three members residing within the City, three members residing outside of the City but within the District and one member of the City of Belgrade Council. The city members shall be appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council. The county members shall be nominated by the Board of County Commissioners and appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council. The City Council member shall be appointed annually by the Mayor with the approval of the Council. The Board meetings are typically held the first Thursday of the month at 6:30pm at 91 E Central Ave, Belgrade, MT 59714 and are open to the public. 1. FUNDING Generating approximately $1.5 million in 2024, the District is taking its first steps to establish a vision and identify potential initial projects based on community input. Funding for the District operation is generated through a special assessment based on the taxable value of each lot, tract, or parcel in the district. The fiscal year for the District runs from July 1st to June 30th. The Board ensures that the budgeting and accounting requirements and obligations for the District are maintained. The City maintains and oversees all funds and accounts related to District funds and provides District financial reports to the City and County quarterly. Each year Belgrade City Staff presents the budget to the Board of Directors, the Belgrade City Council, and the Gallatin County Commission, for approval. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 25 Playground at Lion's Park ---PAGE BREAK--- 26 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN The District has a variety of experiences to offer. The District boundary follows the Belgrade School District #44 footprint, which encompasses the entire City of Belgrade and portions of the Gallatin River, East Gallatin River, and the Bridger Range in Gallatin County. It covers 242 square miles of urban, rural, agricultural, and natural open spaces. Inside the District there are a variety of existing recreation amenities, spanning many jurisdictions, that were established before 2023. Identifying these spaces, regardless of maintenance obligation or ownership is a valuable exercise. Understanding the breadth and diversity of existing recreation within the District will help the Board understand existing conditions and provide insight into future decision making. An inventory of existing park spaces, recreation facilities, pathways, and programs is included in this plan. The inventory includes the four main pieces: • Park Space Inventory Map and Table • Facility and Amenity Table (Appendix G) • District Connections and Pathways • Programming Inventory Matrix Facilities Inventory and Assessment 04 ---PAGE BREAK--- 90 SPRINGHILL RD JACKRABBIT LN RIVER RD HUFFINE LN DRY CREEK RD THORPE RD NORRIS RD FRONTAGE RD MAIN ST E VALLEY CENTER RD AMSTERDAM RD LOVE LN LINNEY RD BAXTER LN PENWELL BRIDGE ROAD ALASKA RD S REESE CREEK ROAD AIRWAY BLVD CAMERON BRIDGE EAST RD ROYAL RD CHURCHILL RD W DRY CREEK RD POWERS BLVD FRANK ROAD EAST BASELINE 2 BROADWAY ST BOLINGER RD VALLEY CENTER RD CRUISER LN OREGON ST GOLDEN WEST DR FRONTAGE RD AIRPORT ROAD Major Street Network Legend City County City (Non Amenity) County (Non Amenity) Parks District Parcels Road Municipal Boundaries 0 ½ 1 1½ 2 ¼ Miles 90 90 Existing Park Inventory ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 28 A. Existing Conditions Assessment 1. DISTRICT INVENTORY Amongst the 155,000 acres that form the District, 70 recreational areas encompassing 603.2 acres were identified. (Some parcels with identical ownership and direct adjacency, such as areas within subdivisions, were combined.) Every effort was made to produce an inventory that represents the current recreation conditions within the District. To identify the relevant park spaces, facilities and amenities, the team relied on data from a variety of sources. Much of the information was collected from Geographic Information System (GIS) parcel information available from Gallatin County, City of Belgrade, and State of Montana Cadastral. Details regarding existing facilities and recreation amenities constructed within the District were collected using aerial photos, staff institutional knowledge, the 2019 Belgrade Parks & Recreation Master Plan, and the Triangle Trails Plan. Since the inventory is the first one compiled for the District, it is meant to capture as much information as possible and is intended only as an initial record of existing recreation within the District boundary. Currently the only park spaces and recreation facilities/amenities under the purview of the Board, are those owned by the City of Belgrade. These amenities represent only a small fraction of recreation opportunities that exist inside the District. The inventory intentionally extends beyond City of Belgrade ownership to include any space that is listed as Park, Park Area, Open Space, and Common Area in the GIS data. While spaces and amenities are listed, their inclusion is not meant to suggest or define any existing or future ownership, maintenance obligations, or any plans to complete future improvements. Ultimately any decision pertaining to the District role in how these spaces will be managed must be examined further and a formal decision must be made by the Board. A few additional notes on the Park Space Inventory: At this time, the District does not own or maintain HOA parks. However, these areas do provide important recreational opportunities for District residents. As such these spaces are included in the inventory as it is helpful for future planning to understand where these spaces are located and how many of these spaces exist. Several portions of land were excluded from the inventory that do offer some relationship to the District but function and operate differently. These include schools and the large areas of state and federal land that are located primarily along the Bridger Range. The Park Space Inventory includes the following information: Name: The Subdivision, HOA, Park Name, or Lot identification as noted in the GIS data sources Space Type: For inventory purposes only, description of the space as a single parcel of land (Park Space) or made of multiple parcels (Combined Park Space). Size: Total area of parcel(s) in acres Classification: How the space aligns with the Park Type Classifications listed on page 32 Improved: Notes the presence of at least one existing amenity ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 29 90 JACKRABBIT LN THORPE RD SPRINGHILL RD RIVER RD MAIN ST E VALLEY CENTER RD FRONTAGE RD DRY CREEK RD AMSTERDAM RD LINNEY RD PENWELL BRIDGE ROAD ALASKA RD S AIRWAY BLVD CAMERON BRIDGE EAST RD ROYAL RD AIRPORT ROAD POWERS BLVD FRANK ROAD EAST BASELINE 2 8TH ST BROADWAY ST BOLINGER RD SPOONER RD VALLEY CENTER RD FRANK RD ALASKA FRONTAGE RD CRUISER LN HOFFMAN ST CAMERON BRIDGE WEST RD OREGON ST CENTRAL AVE JEFFERSON AVE GOLDEN WEST DR CAMERON AVE CHEERY DR WESTWOOD CL NEVADA ST NORTHERN PACIFIC AVE MAYFAIR DR THUNDER ROAD Companion Way ROSEBUD AVE SPAIN BRIDGE RD 13TH STREET FRONTAGE RD 90 90 90 AIRPORT ROAD CAMERON BRIDGE WEST RD 90 90 Legend District Park Spaces District Boundary Roads Belgrade City Limits Parcels Forest Service Trails Waterways 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 1/8 Miles Park Space Inventory Map, All Parks by Name ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 30 Name Space Type Size (acres) Classification Improved 1 4-DOT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 8.7 Neighborhood Park Yes 2 ADDITION TO BELGRADE Park Space 0.2 Pocket Park No 3 ASHTON MEADOWS SUB Park Space 8.0 Neighborhood Park No 4 KIWANIS PARK Combined Park Space 1.7 Pocket Park Yes 5 QUINELLA PARK Combined Park Space 1.2 Pocket Park No 6 BELGRADE GARDENS SUBDIVISION Park Space 5.9 Neighborhood Park Yes 7 CHILDREN'S PARK Combined Park Space 0.3 Pocket Park Yes 8 LEWIS AND CLARK PARK Combined Park Space 6.7 Neighborhood Park Yes 9 BRIDGER HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 5.5 Neighborhood Park No 10 SUNNYSIDE PARK Park Space 3.0 Neighborhood Park Yes 11 TRIANGLE PARK Combined Park Space 0.2 Pocket Park No 12 CITY OF BELGRADE UNNAMED PARK AREA 1 Combined Park Space 8.3 Neighborhood Park No 13 CLARKIN PARK Park Space 1.0 Pocket Park No 14 CLOVERLEAF MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 4.7 Neighborhood Park No 15 COBBLESTONE SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 13.5 Community Park Yes 16 ESTATES SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 10.0 Neighborhood Park No 17 WINER PARK Combined Park Space 0.3 Pocket Park Yes 18 DAVIS SUBDIVISION Park Space 1.9 Pocket Park No 19 LION'S PARK Combined Park Space 14.9 Community Park Yes 20 GALLATIN HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 40.7 Community Park Yes 21 GALLATIN RIVER FARM NORTH SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 5.0 Neighborhood Park No 22 GALLATIN VALLEY HOMESTEADS Park Space 3.5 Neighborhood Park Yes 23 MAYFAIR MEADOWS PARK Combined Park Space 5.1 Neighborhood Park No 24 HEATHS SECOND ADDITION TO BELGRADE Park Space 0.2 Pocket Park No 25 HENSON SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 4.1 Neighborhood Park No 26 JERRY ASKIN PARK Park Space 6.2 Neighborhood Park Yes 27 LANDMARK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1 Combined Park Space 10.4 Community Park No 28 LANDMARK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 4 Combined Park Space 4.9 Neighborhood Park Yes 29 LAS CAMPANAS SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1 Park Space 0.7 Pocket Park No 30 MCMILLAN PARK Park Space 0.5 Pocket Park No 31 LAS CAMPANAS SUBDIVISION, PHASE 3 Combined Park Space 1.0 Pocket Park No 32 MILLER PARK Park Space 0.5 Pocket Park Yes 33 KATHY HOLLENSTEINER PARK, Park Space 1.6 Pocket Park Yes 34 MEADOWLARK RANCH Combined Park Space 16.1 Community Park Yes 35 MEMORIAL PARK Combined Park Space 0.2 Pocket Park Yes 36 MINOR SUBDIVISION 292A Park Space 2.7 Neighborhood Park No 37 MINOR SUBDIVISION 518 Combined Park Space 2.3 Neighborhood Park No 38 MINOR SUBDIVISION 540 Park Space 0.4 Pocket Park No 39 MISSION PARK SUBDIVISION Park Space 2.4 Neighborhood Park No 40 MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 9.3 Neighborhood Park Yes Park Space Inventory Table ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 31 Name Space Type Size (acres) Classification Improved 41 MOUNTVIEW SUBDIVISION Park Space 0.5 Pocket Park No 42 NELSON MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 1.3 Pocket Park No 43 OLD PLACE SUBDIVISION Park Space 1.8 Pocket Park No 44 OUTLAW COUNTRY Combined Park Space 19.0 Community Park No 45 PRESCOTT RANCH SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 7.8 Neighborhood Park Yes 46 RIVER ROCK NORTH SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 5.0 Neighborhood Park Yes 47 RIVER ROCK SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 18.2 Community Park No 48 RIVER ROCK SUBDIVISION, THE TRADITIONS Combined Park Space 4.7 Neighborhood Park No 49 RIVER ROCK SUBDIVISION, THE VILLAS Combined Park Space 0.6 Pocket Park No 50 RIVERWOOD SOUTH SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 18.8 Community Park No 51 ROYAL ARABIAN SUBDIVISION Park Space 3.1 Neighborhood Park No 52 ROYAL VILLAGE SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 7.7 Neighborhood Park Yes 53 RYEN GLENN ESTATES SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 18.3 Community Park Yes 54 SCOTTISH ACRES SUBDIVISION Park Space 3.8 Neighborhood Park No 55 PRAIRIE VIEW PARK Combined Park Space 4.0 Neighborhood Park Yes 56 SHAKIRA SUBDIVISION Park Space 2.1 Neighborhood Park No 57 SIERRA VIEW SUBDIVISION Park Space 3.5 Neighborhood Park No 58 SILOS PUD SUBDIVISION - CAMERON CROSSING Park Space 2.7 Neighborhood Park No 59 SILOS PUD SUBDIVISION - JUNIPER ESTATES Park Space 2.2 Neighborhood Park No 60 SPAIN BRIDGE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 106.9 Community Park No 61 STORY CREEK SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 2.9 Neighborhood Park No 62 SUMMIT SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 5.1 Neighborhood Park No 63 THORPE COMMERCIAL CENTER SUBDIVISION, Park Space 2.1 Neighborhood Park No 64 VALLEY GROVE SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 23.8 Community Park No 57 SIERRA VIEW SUBDIVISION Park Space 3.5 Neighborhood Park No 58 SILOS PUD SUBDIVISION - CAMERON CROSSING Park Space 2.7 Neighborhood Park No 59 SILOS PUD SUBDIVISION - JUNIPER ESTATES Park Space 2.2 Neighborhood Park No 60 SPAIN BRIDGE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 106.9 Community Park No 61 STORY CREEK SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 2.9 Neighborhood Park No 62 SUMMIT SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 5.1 Neighborhood Park No 63 THORPE COMMERCIAL CENTER SUBDIVISION Park Space 2.1 Neighborhood Park No 64 VALLEY GROVE SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 23.8 Community Park No 65 VALLEY VISTA SUBDIVISION Park Space 2.4 Neighborhood Park No 66 WESTLAKE PARK SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 40.2 Community Park No 67 WILDFLOWER SUBDIVISION Park Space 3.5 Neighborhood Park No 68 WILDHORSE TRAIL PROPERTIES SUBDIVISION Combined Park Space 21.5 Community Park No 69 YUKON SUBDIVISION Park Space 1.0 Pocket Park No 70 BELGRADE YOUTH SPORTS COMPLEX Park Space 55.2 Community Park Yes TOTAL 603.2 ACRES Park Space Inventory Table (continued) ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 32 B. Park Classifications and Definitions A park classification system categorizes spaces based on certain attributes like purpose, features, facilities and size. A park classification system can help the District understand existing spaces and amenities and aid in the identification during future park planning. Currently, most of the parks within the District are smaller in size and serve the neighborhoods in which they are located. These Neighborhood Parks provide a good foundation for the system and create opportunities for recreation that are usually a walk, bike, or short drive away. However, when thinking about creating a well-rounded, functional park system, the District should also consider large scale areas, like community and regional parks. Large scale spaces provide different recreational opportunities than their smaller counterparts and act as a destination for District residents. Large scale amenities are missing from the District's Park Space Inventory and are needed according to NRPA metrics. The District will play an important role in the creation of large scale park spaces. Under current policies, the development of new subdivisions alone will not facilitate the creation of a Community or Regional Park. Instead, the District, with its newly created authority is best suited to plan for, own, and operate them. Park Type Classifications Type Pocket Park Neighborhood Park Community Park Regional Park Special Use Size (typical) 0.25 – 2 acre(s) 2 – 10 acres 10 – 100 acres 100+ acres No typical park size, service area, or amenities - may include double classification. Service Area 1/4 mile radius 1/2 mile radius 1 mile radius 5 mile radius Typical Elements • Small pavilion w/ picnic area • Seating • Perimeter or linear walkway • Special niche use • Field and court sports • Playground • Small pavilion w/ picnic area • Seating area • Perimeter walk • Multiple large field and court sports • Playground • Pavilion w/ picnic areas • Seating and viewing areas • Perimeter and interior pathways • Variable mix of passive and active use based on sites and desires • Multiple large field and court sports • Playground • Large pavilion w/ picnic areas • Multiple seating and viewing areas • Perimeter and interior pathways ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 33 C. Equity As the District evolves, it is important to spatially illustrate the distribution of the various park spaces, park types and park amenities to ensure that the level of service remains consistent across the District. In the Park Service Area exhibits on the following pages, a radius from the park areas is offset to form the "park service area". Each park type has a unique classification and park service area that is assigned in the prior section. Understanding park equity and finding solutions to improve opportunities in underserved areas can be nuanced. In some instances, additional parks and amenities, such as a regional park outside the District boundary, may exist and would improve this simple equity analysis. In addition, some of the unshaded areas on the maps may simply not provide good opportunities for park development. For example, locations with prime agricultural land, environmentally sensitive lands, highways, airports, and industrial areas could all inaccurately show a deficiency. Within the City of Belgrade, where much of the District population is located, adequate park coverage is provided in most areas. Outside of this area, level of service diminishes, and population drops quickly. This is expected due to agricultural uses, industrial uses, and the airport. If the District is interested in seeking additional information about park equity, this study could be enhanced by looking at the relationship between population density and recreation type. Beyond simply looking at park acreage and location, available facility and recreational amenities are also important considerations for equitable access to recreation. As shown in the Park Service Area exhibits on the following pages, the distinction between parks with amenities and without amenities is highlighted, creating a much different level of service outcome. As suggested in prior portions of the Plan, it is recommended that the District reach out to HOA’s to discuss and inventory these spaces. Belgrade Skate Park ---PAGE BREAK--- DRY CREEK RD SPRINGHILL RD JACKRABBIT LN RIVER RD FRONTAGE RD AMSTERDAM RD DURSTON RD THORPE RD W DRY CREEK RD BAXTER LANE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ROAD MAIN ST BRIDGER CANYON RD E VALLEY CENTER RD N 19TH AVE BAXTER LN REESE CREEK ROAD LINNEY RD LOVE LN PENWELL BRIDGE ROAD ALASKA RD S L ST MANLEY RD BRIDGER DR AIRWAY BLVD MCILHATTEN RD AIRPORT ROAD PEACH ST BOLINGER RD FRONTAGE RD BOZEMAN BELGRADE Bridger Mountains Gallatin River 90 90 Legend District Park Spaces District Boundary Roads Belgrade City Limits Major Streets 0 1 2 3 4 ½ Miles Forest Service Trails Waterways Parks With No Amenities 1/4 Mile Radius (Pocket Park) 1/2 Mile Radius (Neighborhood Park) 1 Mile Radius (Community Park) Park Service Area, Existing Parks with Amenities ---PAGE BREAK--- DRY CREEK RD SPRINGHILL RD JACKRABBIT LN RIVER RD FRONTAGE RD AMSTERDAM RD DURSTON RD THORPE RD W DRY CREEK RD BAXTER LANE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ROAD MAIN ST BRIDGER CANYON RD E VALLEY CENTER RD N 19TH AVE BAXTER LN REESE CREEK ROAD LINNEY RD LOVE LN PENWELL BRIDGE ROAD ALASKA RD S L ST MANLEY RD BRIDGER DR AIRWAY BLVD MCILHATTEN RD AIRPORT ROAD PEACH ST BOLINGER RD FRONTAGE RD BOZEMAN BELGRADE Bridger Mountains Gallatin River 90 90 Legend District Park Spaces District Boundary Roads Belgrade City Limits Major Streets 0 1 2 3 4 ½ Miles Forest Service Trails Waterways 1/4 Mile Radius (Pocket Park) 1/2 Mile Radius (Neighborhood Park) 1 Mile Radius (Community Park) Park Service Area, All Parks with Amenities (Potential) ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 36 D. Places and Facilities 1. PLACES AND FACILITIES INVENTORY Through the study of existing places and facilities, the key takeaway is that the character of parks and facilities varies greatly throughout the District. Primarily, this variation is seen in size, distribution, level of development, and ownership of the space. Where population is higher, such as in central Belgrade, parks are much smaller and offer more developed amenities, whereas outside this area the relationship is flipped. With residential growth predicted to occur outside the City center, additional park spaces will naturally fill in around city limits. However without a minimum design standard or additional review, these spaces may not develop in line with the needs of the District. For instance, it is highly unlikely that new subdivisions will be able to create large recreational facilities and amenities that the District is lacking. Additionally, these areas my not develop in areas that are currently underserved. A few key statistics of existing park amenities: • Total Acreage in the District is 154,645 • Total Acreage of park areas is 603.2 • The District features 70 Park Areas • The average District park area is 8.6 acres • Total number of HOA maintained Park and Open Space Areas is 39 • Total number of City of Belgrade Parks is 31 • 38.6% of the District’s park area currently includes a field, court, and/or play amenities. • 58.6% of the District’s park areas include multiple park spaces. City County District Total Park Areas 31 39 70 Total Acreage 182.7 420.5 603.2 Avg Acreage 5.9 10.8 8.6 Amenity Count - Courts 9 5 14 Amenity Count - Fields 7 0 7 Amenity Count - Playgrounds 13 9 22 Existing Park Amenities ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 37 Diamond Field at Lion's Park ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 38 2. COMPARISON AGAINST NATIONAL STANDARDS The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) is the leading non-profit organization dedicated to building strong, vibrant, and resilient communities through the power of parks and recreation. Annually, the NRPA releases an Agency Performance Review surveying Park and Recreation Agencies about existing amenities, programming, and other pertinent data within the Park and Recreation industry. Utilizing the 2024 report, which included input from nearly 1,000 Park and Recreation Agencies across the country from 2021 to 2023, an existing level of service is provided in this master plan for reference. While this analysis offers insight against a national average, the unique nature and location of the District does justify special consideration. Nonetheless, this analysis provides a valuable benchmark for the current state of the District and should be considered. To complete the analysis, the team used an approximate District population. Based on the American Community Survey (ACS) 2022 5-year estimate, the District population was estimated to be 26,379 in 2022. This estimate was used to gauge whether the District was meeting, exceeding, or lagging the national NRPA benchmark levels. With the current projection for large growth in the District, particularly in Belgrade, the level of services will continue to trend down without the addition of new park areas, amenities and facilities. The Level of Service analysis also relied on information regarding existing recreation amenities in the District. Information contained in the Existing Amenity Inventory column was collected using Geographic Information System (GIS) parcel information available from Gallatin County, City of Belgrade, and State of Montana Cadastral. Further details regarding existing facilities and recreation amenities was also collected using aerial photos, staff institutional knowledge, the previous City of Belgrade park master plan and the Triangle Trails Plan. The recreation facility and amenity information collected for the analysis is further defined in the Level of Service Facility and Amenity Definitions. The definitions were used to quantify existing facilities and amenities and are referred to in the Existing Level of Service Table under the "Existing Amenity Inventory" column. The facility and amenity information is fully summarized in the Facility and Amenity Table found in the Appendix G. Regarding outdoor facilities and amenities, the District is meeting most of the expected facilities and amenities of its population. A few exceptions, which received more input from the community, include rectangular fields and diamond fields. Regarding indoor facilities and amenities, the District is lagging due to the lack of indoor facilities. This is consistent with community feedback. Recommendations and capital projects are provided in the upcoming sections to address these deficiencies. This analysis can be updated annually, and it is important to periodically review the District population to keep an accurate benchmark. Given the significant timeline to move projects from planning and design through to construction, it is also beneficial for the Board to be proactive about future projects in order to meet the service demands of the growing District population. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 39 Facility Median Number of Residents Per Facility Facilities needed based on population (2022) Existing Amenity Inventory Level of Service Meet/ Exceeds/ Lags OUTDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND AMENITIES Playgrounds 3,707 6 22 366% Exceeds Diamond fields 3,105 8 6 75% Lags Basketball courts 7,501 4 5 125% Exceeds Rectangular fields 3,333 8 1 13% Lags Multiuse courts (tennis/pickleball) 13,000 2 9 450% Exceeds Dog parks 27,508 1 1 100% Meets Skateboard parks 33,167 1 1 100% Meets Splash pads, spray grounds or spray showers 30,629 1 1 100% Meets Ice rinks 19,770 1 2 200% Exceeds Walking loops/Running tracks 18,585 1 0 0% Lags INDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND AMENITIES Recreation centers (including gyms) 24,487 1 0 0% Lags Performance amphitheaters (indoor or outdoor) 32,255 1 1 100% Meets Aquatics centers 31,000 1 0 0% Lags Stadiums 32,299 1 0 0% Lags Teen centers 31,785 1 0 0% Lags Existing Level of Service Note: In order to provide a simple analysis, and given the conceptual nature of the comparison, the above exhibit contains some rounding. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 40 4. LEVEL OF SERVICE FACILITY AND AMENITY DEFINITIONS The District includes a wide range of facilities and amenities that vary in quality. Below are the definitions used to quantify recreational facilities and amenities for the Level of Service analysis. These definitions are intended to create clarity about included and excluded amenities and are meant to align with the minimum expectations of recreational users. OUTDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND AMENITIES Playgrounds • Includes playground equipment and fall zone surfacing • Adjacent playgrounds within the same amenity area that are serving different age groups are counted as one playground Diamond Fields • Includes softball, tee ball, and baseball fields and each are quantified • Grass or field material with regulation striping, bases, mound, and backstop • Can share use with other recreational amenities rectangular fields) Basketball Courts • Full court or half court • Paved and striped • Does not share space with other uses parking) Rectangular Fields • Striped fields for football, soccer, lacrosse, and other related field types • Grass or field material with striping and associated goals • Fields striped for multiple sports are quantified as one • Can share use with other recreational amenities diamond fields) Multiuse Courts - Tennis/Pickleball • Striped with hard playing surface that could accommodate tennis or pickleball • Includes net Dog Parks • Formally designated off leash dog park area that is typically enclosed Skateboard Parks • Includes sloped or curved structures for skateboarding, roller skating, BMX, and scooters 3. ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS • The development of a large community park and Aquatic Center remain the top project priorities of respondents. • Respondents have an interest in recreation facilities and sporting fields that are flexible for various activities and remain accessible in all seasons, including indoor facilities during the colder season. • Key priorities for many respondents are upgrades, improvements, and maintenance of existing baseball fields at Lions Park. • Residents shared a strong desire for more dog parks and dog-friendly areas, and have an interest in other facility investments such as an amphitheater and bike park. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 41 Splash Pads, Spray Grounds, or Spray Showers • Outdoor play area with sprinklers, fountains, or nozzles that spray water within an area with little or no standing water • Located within hardscape Ice Rinks • Includes natural or ice and is dedicated for leisure or recreational use • Frozen water bodies are excluded Walking Loops/Running Tracks • Looped pathway with marked distance that is intended for walking or running multiple loops • Smooth surfacing typically consisting of concrete, asphalt, or material • Flat topography • Excludes pathways used for hiking, biking, and similar uses INDOOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND AMENITIES Recreation Centers (including gyms) • Facility that includes the space for sports, play, leisure, and fitness activities Performance Amphitheaters (indoor or outdoors) • Covered stage area with ability to host performances • Includes sloped or terraced area for temporary or permanent seating Aquatics Centers • Type of community center focused on water-based recreation Stadiums • Large enclosed area with tiered seating for spectators • Hosts sporting events, performances, or other events Teen Centers • A type of community center focused on social, education, and wellness programming for adolescents Play structures at Corbett Park ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 42 5. CAPITAL PROJECTS Many capital projects relevant to places and facilities are recommended in this Master Plan. Listed below are the most significant and highest impact projects. As with all project and Master Plan recommendations, they are based on the Park Space Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. The full list of capital projects can be found in Chapter 8. CIP 4D.1 Relocate Lions Park Baseball Fields The current baseball fields at Lions Park require replacement at a new location due to several factors. First, the land exchange with the School District approved by voters in November of 2024 requires that new facilities are established prior to the use of the Park by the School District. Although the timing of the School District improvements to the land is unknown, it is beneficial for the District to be proactive in procuring a site that allows for a thoughtfully designed and long-term facility that is central to the District’s population. Procuring a large parcel of land suitable for this may be challenging given development pressure and land prices. Currently, there is a large parcel of land owned by the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) north of the City and adjacent to the airport that would serve as an excellent site for future baseball fields, among other amenities. It is recommended that the District pursue a permanent easement with DNRC for this facility. Although the land is larger than what is required to replace the current fields, it is a rare land opportunity that would also allow the District to fulfill the current and future needs of the growing District population for other parks, facilities, and programs. Alternatively, the District may consider building out the existing Belgrade Sports Complex with additional fields. Large support for youth athletics, specifically baseball and softball, was recorded during the community engagement effort. Ideally, youth athletic facilities, including new diamond fields, could be part of a large Regional Park. By including these amenities into a regional park, vehicle parking could be shared with other uses that operate at different times of the year and baseball visitors could have access to other recreational amenities while at the park (play spaces and trails). Given the age of the existing baseball facilities at Lions Park, more maintenance is required to keep the spaces and facilities acceptable for use. Much of this maintenance is currently completed by volunteers and investing more money into the maintenance of these older fields is not an ideal use of District funds. Key Tasks • Study land acquisition opportunities that measure site program capacity, purchase/lease options, potential funding mechanisms, partnership opportunities. • Conduct a community master planning effort that confirms vision and develops phasing following acquisition. DNRC Site and Potential Regional Park Location PENWELL BR Potential Pathway Connection DRY CREEK RD Potential Regional Park ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 43 CIP 4D.2 Develop an aquatic and recreation center. Creating an aquatic and recreation center has been a community priority for awhile and based upon community feedback, interest remains high. The creation of this facility would greatly increase the opportunity for available programming offerings during all seasons. It would put the District in line with the current national level of service expectations. That said, creating a facility at this scale requires substantial fiscal planning over the course of many years, and given the current inflationary environment, costs are expected to rise continually in the coming years. It is recommended that the District take advantage of opportunities as they arise rather than deferring all planning to a later date. Specifically, finding a large, centrally-located site for this facility is a good first step. To aid in this process, it is recommended that the District partner with groups, organizations, and potential donors. Additionally, the DNRC site may also provide an excellent location for aquatic and recreation Center. Key Tasks • Study land acquisition opportunities that measure site program capacity, purchase/lease options, potential funding mechanisms, partnership opportunities. • Develop a community master planning effort that confirms a vision for the center and develops a construction phasing plan following acquisition. • Pursue partnerships and discuss roles and responsibilities with potential organizations – specifically look to partner with organizations that can provide insight and expertise with facility management. CIP 4D.3 Improve and integrate additional amenities at Belgrade Youth Sports Complex While multi-purpose sports fields exist within the District, based on the level of service analysis and the overwhelming community support for youth activities, additional field spaces are needed. Ideally, additional fields are clustered to provide an opportunity for the District to host tournaments. Including a cluster of multi-purpose fields at a future Regional Park should be studied. Although community input clearly supported the desire to improve and expand youth sports and activities at the complex, improving or expanding a soccer program within the District was not clearly identified. Additional community feedback included the need to pave the parking lot and to use the fields as a cross-country skiing hub during the winter season. Key Tasks • Confirm resource needs from existing local sport clubs on desired needs. • Create master plan to study feasibility at Belgrade Youth Sports Complex or other sites. CIP 4D.4 Implement a playground replacement program for all existing owned facilities In addition to the Districts’ current playground safety tracking, it is recommended that a detailed playground replacement program be developed which lists the projected lifespan of park playgrounds and the estimated replacement timeline. Playgrounds are high-cost amenities and their replacement have potentially long-lead times that require additional planning. CIP 4D.5 Add field and court striping to existing amenities to meet level of service definitions Some fields and courts within the District are not striped and based upon the level of service ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 44 definitions in this Master Plan, do not meet minimum requirements for formal use. For example, not all basketball courts are striped and it is recommended that they are in order to provide formal use. Through the collaboration with local athletic groups and volunteers, striping could potentially be completed at a reduced cost. CIP 0.1 Create dog park in Henson Neighborhood The Henson Neighborhood is interested in seeing the development of a dog park. This interest, combined with general community support to see more dog parks, it is recommended that the District support this project. CIP 0.2 Implement the Park Master Plan at Mayfair Meadows Park In 2024, the Mayfair Meadows Park Master Plan was adopted and it is recommended that the District move forward with implementation. Key features of this plan include: Recreational bike facility; Open space; Parking; Shelter; and Playground. CIP 0.3 Develop mini arboretum and nature walk at Quinella Park Quinella Park is a small linear pocket park bisected by an irrigation ditch. As a part of the 2019 Belgrade Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the addition of canopy trees and a simple linear pathway would improve the user experience. CIP 0.4 Add parking and dog park amenities to the City of Belgrade Unnamed Park #1 Labeled as #12 on the Park Space Inventory Table, this park and former landfill site on the southeast side of Belgrade, is passively used as a walking area and dog park. Simple improvements are recommended and include dog stations, fencing (as needed), and a small parking lot. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS Below are recommendations for places and facilities within the District. As with all project and Master Plan recommendations, they are based on the Park Space Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. REC 4D.1 Conduct District-wide Facility and Amenity Inventory Conduct an annual update to the District Park Space and Facility inventory. REC 4D.2 Establish recommended service levels standards for District Facilities Routinely evaluate district facilities to establish service goals that support the District population. REC 4D.3 Cultivate strong partnerships and formal agreements with Local, State, and Federal agencies and organizations There are many entities with overlapping recreational missions and goals. Through collaboration, ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 45 the District could create opportunities to partner to provide services maintenance, land, etc.) with other organizations. Gallatin Valley Land Trust, Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, and US Forest Service are three important contacts. REC 4D.4 Seek corporate and individual funding and create donation opportunities As the District grows in popularity, corporate and individual donations could become an important revenue source. The Board should discuss the most appropriate methods annually and evaluate whether efforts were successful. Potential fundraising ideas include hosting fundraising events and creation of adopt-a-park or adopt-a-trail sponsorships. REC 4D.5 Integrate District priorities and plan goals into new parks associated with development applications Define minimum park standards and a cash-in-lieu of park dedication process that promote the creation of high-quality park areas that align with plan goals. Work with Gallatin County to create a seat at the table for the District to review new park spaces associated with development applications. REC 4D.6 Meet with HOA’s to discuss neighborhood park space and potential partnerships HOA maintained park spaces make up a large portion of the existing park inventory but many of these spaces are not developed and/or do not have amenities. If amenities were added to these areas, park equity across the District would increase greatly, and residents would be more likely to utilize parks due to their proximity. As part of this discussion, asking the HOA about future park maintenance and improvement plans is recommended. REC 4D.7 Find and procure land for future park spaces With the rapid growth projected in the District, planning for future park spaces may be difficult. To be proactive about the future needs of the District, investing in acreage, even if it remains undeveloped, will provide the District with recreational amenity opportunities that are proportional to the Districts population. REC 4D.8 Create Park Signage and Wayfinding Master Plan Creating a consistent park signage and wayfinding master plan would create continuity in the District and create awareness of the District's work. REC 4D.9 Create site Master Plans for all major owned parks in the system Starting with larger parks in the District, having a conceptual master plan for each major owned park in the District will help identify future capital projects and engage the community on their desires. REC 4D.10 Prioritize projects located in areas in the District with low park equity Based upon the park equity map, seek opportunities to locate future parks and amenities in underserved areas. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 46 E. Pathways 1. PATHWAY INVENTORY For the purpose of the Master Plan, existing trails were defined in two ways: Recreational Pathways and Transportation Pathways. The Master Plan focuses on the identification and planning of recreational rather than transportation pathways. These pathways are defined as: Recreational Pathway – A pathway that accommodates low-speed users and is not within a street right of way. Recreational pathways are typically used for leisure and exercise and link to other amenities. Internal park circulation pathways are excluded. Transportation Pathway – A hard surface pathway that accommodates moderate to high-speed users and is directly adjacent to or within a street right of way. It links users from key destinations getting them from point-to-point as quickly as possible. Other than one short Recreational Pathway segment near Sunnyside Park and I-90, all other Recreational Pathways within the District are owned and maintained by USFS and HOA's. Recreational Pathways have been inventoried to assist in the future study and planning of connections within the District. Internal park circulation that lead users to various amenities within park areas connecting a parking lot to a playground, connecting a shelter to a restroom, etc.) are not included. Although the Master Plan does not intend to establish Transportation Pathways, other documents such as the Belgrade Transportation Master Plan (TMP) will provide these recommendations. Close coordination between this document and other related transportation planning efforts is required to create a robust active transportation network that serves a variety of users. The proceeding District Connections maps and map enlargements highlight the current and proposed pathways within the District. The District Connection Opportunities map highlights areas and destinations that the public were most interested in seeing developed in the future. The Pathway Inventory also includes trails proposed in the Triangle Trails Plan. The Triangle Trails Plan is a collaboration between Gallatin County and the Gallatin Valley Land Trust that was approved by the Belgrade City Council and Gallatin County Commission in 2021. It provides guidelines for new trails proposed in the area between Bozeman, Belgrade, and Four Corners, some of which fall within the District Boundary. The Triangle Trails Plan is part of the Gallatin County Growth Policy and provides insight into how to connect existing trails to new ones proposed within the triangle area. It includes future trail routes which are acknowledged in this Master Plan and can be found on the proceeding maps. In order to complete the District Connections & Pathways Map, the team relied on Geographic Information System (GIS) parcel information available from Gallatin County, City of Belgrade, and State of Montana Cadastral. Further details regarding existing Recreation Pathways was also collected using aerial photos, staff institutional knowledge, the previous City of Belgrade Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the Triangle Trails Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- JACKRABBIT LN LOVE LN THORPE RD DRY CREEK RD SPRINGHILL RD ROCKY MOUNTAIN RD ROCKY MOUNTAIN RD CAMERON BRIDGE RD PENWELL BRIDGE RD BOZEMAN MANHATTAN BELGRADE GEE NORMAN RD REESE CREEK RD AMSTERDAM RD VALLEY CENTER RD E HULBERT RD FRONTAGE RD RIVER RD DRY CREEK RD DRY CREEK RD B ri d ger F o ot h i ll s Nat’ l R e c r e a ti on T r a il North Cottonwood Corby Gulch Trail North Cottonwood/ Johnson Canyon Trail Truman Gulch Trail Cameron Bridge Fishing Access Erwin Bridge Fishing Access West Dry Creek Fishing Access I-90 Bridge/ Frontage Rd Fishing Access Flathead Pass Jeep Trail 90 90 90 0 1 2 3 4 ½ Miles Legend District Park Spaces District Boundary Roads Municipal Boundaries Fishing Access Belgrade City Limits Major Streets Forest Service Trails Waterways Existing Trails School District Connections, Existing Recreation Pathways and Proposed Triangle Trails Plan Pathways Enlargement ---PAGE BREAK--- 90 JACKRABBIT LN THORPE RD MAIN ST RIVER RD AMSTERDAM RD LINNEY RD ALASKA RD S AIRWAY BLVD CAMER FRONTAGE RD ROYAL RD DRY CREEK RD FRANK ROAD 8TH ST BROADWAY ST SPOONER RD VALLEY CENTER RD BOLINGER RD ALASKA FRONTAGE RD CRUISER LN HOFFMAN ST CAMERON BRIDGE WEST RD OREGON ST GOLDEN WEST DR MADISON AVE THUNDER ROAD Companion Way 90 CAMERON BRIDGE WEST RD District Connections, Existing Recreation Pathways and Proposed Triangle Trails Plan Pathways Enlargement ---PAGE BREAK--- 90 90 SPRINGHILL RD RON BRIDGE EAST RD POWERS BLVD EAST BASELINE 2 N 19TH AVE AIRPORT ROAD FRONTAGE RD 0 ½ 1 1½ 2 ¼ Miles Legend District Park Spaces District Boundary Municipal Boundaries Major Streets Existing Trails Proposed Connector Trail (TTP) Triangle Trails Plan (TTP) Boundary Proposed Commuter Trail (TTP) Potential Pathway Connection River Corridor ---PAGE BREAK--- JACKRABBIT LN LOVE LN THORPE RD DRY CREEK RD SPRINGHILL RD ROCKY MOUNTAIN RD ROCKY MOUNTAIN RD CAMERON BRIDGE RD PENWELL BRIDGE RD BOZEMAN MANHATTAN BELGRADE GEE NORMAN RD REESE CREEK RD AMSTERDAM RD VALLEY CENTER RD E HULBERT RD FRONTAGE RD RIVER RD DRY CREEK RD DRY CREEK RD B ri d ger F o ot h i ll s Nat’ l R e c r e a ti on T r a il North Cottonwood Corby Gulch Trail North Cottonwood/ Johnson Canyon Trail Truman Gulch Trail Cameron Bridge Fishing Access Erwin Bridge Fishing Access West Dry Creek Fishing Access I-90 Bridge/ Frontage Rd Fishing Access Flathead Pass Jeep Trail 90 90 90 Gallatin River Bozeman to Manhattan Central Belgrade Belgrade to West Bridger Trailheads 0 1 2 3 4 ½ Miles Legend District Park Spaces District Boundary Roads Municipal Boundaries Fishing Access Belgrade City Limits Major Streets Forest Service Trails Waterways Existing Trails School Potential Pathway Connection Triangle Trails Plan Boundary (TTP) Proposed Connector Trails (TTP) Proposed Commuter Trails (TTP) District Connection Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 51 2. COMPARISON WITH NATIONAL STANDARDS NRPA pathway data combines trails, greenways, and other outdoor walking areas for community members. A typical park and recreation agency is responsible for managing 16 miles of trails for communities between 20,000 to 49,999 in population. The District currently owns one short recreational pathway segment near Sunnyside Park and I-90, and all other recreational pathways within the District are owned and maintained by HOA's for a total of 8.21 miles. Additionally, the USFS owns and operates a total of 56.9 miles on the west side of the Bridger Range. 3. ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS • Respondents feel strongly that additional active transportation improvements that provide safe connections between existing parks, public facilities should be prioritized. • Respondents noted a desire for more safe and protected bike lanes and trails for commuting. • Respondents share interest in new, broader, trail connections throughout the District. • Respondents noted future pathway considerations should consider alignment with public roadways and ensure the impact of property owners is minimized. Trails on private property require coordination and approval from property owners. 4. CAPITAL PROJECTS Many capital projects relevant to pathways are recommended in the Master Plan. Listed below are the most significant and highest impact projects. As with all project and plan recommendations, they are based on the Programming Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. CIP 4E.1 Create a Recreational and Transportation path that links Bozeman To Manhattan Through the project engagement process, respondents expressed strong interest in creating a pathway through Belgrade that links Manhattan and Bozeman. This was also identified as a proposed project in the 2019 Belgrade Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Part of this project could contribute to the Great American Rail-Trail that links 3,700 miles of trail from the west coast to the east coast. Given the potential contribution to this larger trail system, it may be eligible for federal and state grants opportunities. District Connection Opportunities Central Belgrade Gallatin River Belgrade to West Bridger Trailheads Bozeman to Manhattan ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 52 CIP 4E.2 Create Recreational Pathways to improve access to fishing sites and the Gallatin River Deep history surrounds the Gallatin River and several fishing access sites provide outdoor enthusiasts with access to the river. Through a potential partnership with Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks, the District could work to improve those access sites. Planning efforts should also include the creation of a north/south non-motorized river path. Improving access to these sites via non-motorized transportation could reduce automobile reliance and alleviate parking demand. Currently, much of the river corridor is privately owned so pathway alignment would require flexibility. Conservation easements and other access agreements with private property owners will also be crucial to project success. CIP 4E.3 Create an off-street Recreational Pathway loop surrounding the City of Belgrade The creation of a Recreational Pathway that is located primarily off-road and detached from the public Right-of-Way should be considered. The route should be designed to safely accommodate hikers, cyclists, cross-country skiers, and equestrian riders and was well received within the community. CIP 4E.4 Implement a wayfinding and signage master plan With the desire to create future trail connections and align with the Triangle Trails Plan, creating a unified signage system across District boundaries would greatly improve the user experience. CIP 4E.5 Connect existing Meadowlark Ranch Pathway to DNRC property through an agreement with the Airport Through collaboration with the Airport, it is recommended to connect the existing Meadowlark Ranch Pathway to DNRC land as shown in the adjacent graphic. This connection would require Airport approval and need to respect adjacent property owner rights. 5. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations for pathways within the District are highlighted in the following pages. As with all project and plan recommendations, they are based on the Park Space Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. Potential Pathway Connection to DNRC property PENWELL BR Potential Pathway Connection DRY CREEK RD Potential Regional Park ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 53 REC 4E.1 Identify solutions to improve access to the West Bridger Trailheads Some interest exists to connect central Belgrade to the West Bridger trailheads using Recreation Pathways, however further analysis is needed to determine proper routing, trail type, and the most desirable improvements. Potential items could range from trailhead improvements to pathway links/routes. REC 4E.2 Establish regulations with Gallatin County and the City of Belgrade that require pathway connections to key community amenities and trail design standards within new developments There are currently no regulations in place to require pedestrian connectivity to important locations in the District such as schools, parks, pathways, civic institutions, and major employers. Natural drainages should be prioritized as a way to provide low-impact recreational pathway connections. Additionally, it is recommended that the District find a way to require trail design standards. Standards that align with the Triangle Trails Plan are referenced in Appendix B. REC 4E.3 Work with landowners and organizations to establish public access easements along important pathway corridors Recreational Pathways emphasize connections to recreation amenities and are usually located adjacent to natural elements like drainage corridors, natural open spaces, and parks. These locations are not typically publicly owned. As development occurs, the District must work with property owners to create a contiguous pathway network over time. As highlighted in the Triangle Trails Plan, work has already been completed to capture future public access routes in the southwest portion of the District. REC 4E.4 Meet with HOA’s to discuss Recreation Pathway connections and potential partnerships Much of the HOA maintained park spaces consists of unimproved areas - many of which are linear and serve as open space buffers. These areas could be improved to include multi-use Recreational Pathways that may eventually form a large interconnected system as additional development occurs. REC 4E.5 Complete a District wide recreational trails Master Plan It is recommended that a recreational trails master plan is developed to focus on the detailed analysis of creating a recreational trail network. Project scope could include: Refinement of the pathway inventory; Review of existing trail plans; Analysis of current land and right-of-way ownership; Conceptual wayfinding sign design; Partnerships and funding; and Implementation strategies. REC 4E.6 Consider adopting the Triangle Trails Plan and work with Gallatin County and the City of Belgrade to understand the role of the District in its implementation. It is recommended that the District consider adopting the Triangle Trails Plan. With the Plan already adopted by Gallatin County and the City of Belgrade, it is recommended the Board meet with both parties to understand the role they wish to play in the implementation of the Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 54 F. Minimum Park Requirements There are currently no minimum park design standards in place for parks located within the City of Belgrade or in Gallatin County. This directly correlates to the lack of amenities currently found in existing District parks. Without minimum design standards, when parks are proposed with new development, they are most likely not improved. These unimproved spaces are less likely to be used by District residents and create a cost burden to the District in order to see improvements made in the future. Many of the HOA maintained park spaces function more as landscape buffer areas, linear park corridors, and natural areas, than active parks. Although some buffering and undeveloped open space is beneficial, additional amenities to encourage active use are required. 1. RECOMMENDATIONS Below are recommendations for minimum park requirements within the District. As with all project and plan recommendations, they are based on the Programming Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. REC 4F.1 Establish minimum park design requirements for new parks developed within the District Coordination with the City of Belgrade and Gallatin County is required in order to implement regulatory design standards. PARKS MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING INTENT: Connected Parks should be organized to create an integrated system that connects to interior and exterior parks, open spaces, public lands, schools, trails, transit, commercial areas, and employment centers. Fragmentation of parkland into less usable portions should not be allowed. Parks must be easily accessible to the public via public roads and pathways. Centralized Parkland must be centrally located and the site should be conducive to a variety of uses. Enjoyable Parks must offer a variety of active and passive recreational uses. Parks must provide users with shelter and shade from the elements. PARKS MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: Planting and irrigation • Permanent irrigation is required within all areas of the park area and the adjacent ROW with active recreation. Water conservation is encouraged. • A minimum of 50% of the park should be programmed for active use and include high traffic turfgrass. • A mix of deciduous and evergreen trees must be clustered around play areas to provide shade. • A minimum of six inches of topsoil. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 55 Site dimensions, access, and frontage • The park must allow for easy public access • A 5’ wide minimum concrete sidewalk is required within the adjacent street right-of-way (ROW) Grading and terrain • Stormwater retention and detention for areas outside of the park boundaries does not count towards the parkland dedication. • Site topography and grading must be gradual to allow for a variety of recreational uses. Active Amenities - Parks must include 2 of the following active amenities • Playground • Basketball court • Tennis court • Field sports • Water features • Adult fitness • Skate park • Bike park • Walking path/loop • Dog area Passive Amenities - Parks must include 2 of the following passive amenities • Seating • Shelter or covered performance space • Picnic area • Nature viewing area G. Facilities Maintenance Standards and Maintenance Cycles Providing safe, clean and functional parks, facilities, and amenities is a fundamental role of the District, and directly impacts the level of user satisfaction. Currently, the District has a small team of staff and is responsible for the maintenance of a wide variety of facilities and grounds. Key maintenance responsibilities include: • Athletic field maintenance • Citizen inquiries • Equipment maintenance • Existing maintenance requirements • Facility grounds maintenance • Irrigation • Landscaping • Park building maintenance • Park permit/special event facilitation • Pest/animal management • Playground maintenance • Restroom custodial service • Snow and ice removal • Sport courts • Turf management • Site furnishings, lighting, and equipment maintenance • Special event support ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 56 1. CAPITAL PROJECTS Below is a recommended capital project related to Maintenance in the District. As with all project and plan recommendations, this recommendation is based on the Programming Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. CIP 4G.1 Secure land for a future District maintenance facility As District amenities expand, so too will maintenance responsibilities. With the continual increase in land prices, it is recommended that the District secure land for a maintenance facility or establish a partnership with the City for a shared maintenance facility that anticipates the future needs of the District. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS Below are recommendations related to maintenance in the District. As with all project and plan recommendations, they are based on the Programming Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. REC 4G.1 Create maintenance special events and sponsorship programs Involving the community in the maintenance and care for District parks is an effective and cost effective way to keep facilities and spaces looking good. These programs also help cultivate stewardship in the parks and build awareness. • Operation and maintenance partnerships • Sponsors (adopt-a-trail and adopt-a-park) • Volunteer days for simple maintenance tasks REC 4G.2 Develop management plans that outline maintenance standards, staffing responsibilities, and schedules A series of “use specific” management plans will create efficiencies in park maintenance, ensure consistency in the park experience, set expectations for maintenance, and allow for easier outsourcing of maintenance (as desired). The following maintenance plans are recommended: • Accessibility and equal access • Animal control • Athletic fields • Dog park • Irrigation • Noxious weeds • Playground inspections • Shelter and restrooms • Snow and ice removal • Skate park • Trash removal • Urban forestry ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 57 Additional maintenance plans will be required with the growth of the District and may include the following: • Aquatic Center • Maintenance Yard • Natural resource/open space • Trails and pathways REC 4G.3 Review “in-house” versus “outsourcing” of District maintenance costs With the projected growth predicted to occur within the District ,additional maintenance capacity will be needed. Once comprehensive maintenance plans are complete, it is recommended that the District meet with potential service providers to receive quotes for qualifying services that are challenging for the District to provide. REC 4G.4 Utilize a work order management system (WOMS) A work order system should help streamline requests and limit the number of serious issues through preventative maintenance. Additionally, using this system will help provide actual cost data for performed work. H. Priorities For Facility Improvements and Upgrades This Master Plan identifies many potential improvements and upgrades to occur within the District which can make prioritization challenging. The Board should spend time to understand what the operational costs associated with existing facilities are before recommending improvements or upgrades. Once an annual base budget is understood, the Board can then look at the funding available for improvements and capital projects. Capital Improvement Planning and prioritization criteria should be utilized to help the District decide which projects to focus on first. For additional information see Chapter 5. In general, it is recommended that the District prioritize maintaining existing amenities and create facility maintenance plans for assets within the District before adding new amenities or facilities or expanding programming. I. Recreation and Wellness Best Practices There is currently no District sponsored programming. The District will have the opportunity to start programs from scratch and do so efficiently in order to optimize user experiences. When initiating a recreation program, it is important to focus on the following: Create parks and programs based on community desires Delivering programs that reflect what the community wants is imperative. Using surveys, outreach events and partnerships with existing programs are ways the District can capture and document community preference. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 58 Be fiscally responsible In the Districts’ early years, this is very important as financial resources are modest. As the District matures, its obligations also increase. Focusing on the creation of a diverse financial funding strategy will insulate the District from potential loss of funding sources. Fortunately, much of the current funding is based upon property assessments, which is a consistent income stream. While this source of funding is consistent, the District should focus on creating additional revenue streams to increase resiliency. Be transparent and find effective communication channels Utilizing a variety of digital and print communication tools that target a wide demographic base will help raise awareness and build confidence in the District. Engage the community The District should prioritize regular engagement with the community. Whether the effort is a formal engagement campaign to understand a preference, creation of an annual special event or establishing a volunteer team with a partner organization, consistent effort will create ownership and trust. Provide excellent maintenance Well-maintained parks and efficient programming enhances the user experience and can create a sense of pride. The District should prioritize improving maintenance plans District wide and emphasize responding to public comments and requests. J. Recreation and Wellness Trends While the District does not currently provide any recreational programming, public comment indicates that District residents would support District sponsored programs. When considering the creation of a recreation program, it is important for the District to understand not only what residents want, but current recreation and wellness trends. These trends correlate to demographic shifts and the programming triggered by those shifts. This Master Plan includes a summary of current trends and general findings are listed below. Many of these are informed by Xplor Recreation’s Guide on 2024 Park and Recreation Trends. Xplor Recreation specializes in parks and recreation management software for a wide variety of recreation agencies. Millennials are the largest US population group Strong access to recreation is important to parents and millennials which reinforces the importance parks and recreation play in providing diverse recreational opportunities. Additionally, almost all millennials prefer to shop online which reinforces the importance of providing content in an online format. Highlights: • 69% of parents and millennials strongly agree that access to recreation is important. • 21.8% of the US population are millennials – the largest population group • 80% of new moms in 2023 belong to the millennial demographic • 91% of millennials prefer to shop online ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 59 There is a growing 65+ population The 65+ age group is one of the fastest growing demographic segments nationally. Parks and recreation plays a critical role in enhancing the lives of older adults. With some similarities to millennials, seniors are looking to parks and recreation, but likely for different reasons. With 95% of adults over 60 reporting to have at least one chronic health condition, older adults are often looking for ways to stay active and improve their health. Highlights: • 25% increase in senior participation in outdoor activities from 2018 to 2022 • 38% increase in 65+ population in the US since 2010. Programming and activities Pickleball has seen unprecedented growth in the last few years but it is not the entire story. The proceeding demographic shifts have several other trends that are also likely to stick around. Including pickleball, these include: • Expansion in after school programming for parents to place their children in. Although still a small percentage of parents, there has been a 100% increase in parents using recreation programs for childcare – moving from 5% to 10%. • Dog parks. 45% of families now have a dog and given the decreasing home lot size, taking them to a local dog park is increasingly popular. • Pickleball. Pickleball is expected to stay and research shows it is expected to double by 2027. Contrary to belief, the smallest user group is actually those 55+. • Aquatics, Senior Centers, and Recreation Centers. According to a recent NRPA survey, since 2021, swimming pool visits have seen a 47% increase and senior center and recreation center visits have increased 55%. Aquatics programs are essential to communities, particularly those focused on youth that emphasize learning to swim and water safety. Private pool centers can often be very expensive and do not accommodate the special needs of participants. Important 2025 programming trends: Top increases in planned programming • Special needs • Teen programs • Environmental programs Top decreases in planned programming • Fitness programs • Mindbody programs • Group programs and arts/crafts programs Programming through the Belgrade Senior Center ---PAGE BREAK--- 60 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Operations and Capital Improvement Planning 05 A. Capital Improvement Assessment Framework The number of projects included on the Capital Improvement Project List exceeds what can be accomplished by the District in one fiscal year. So how does the District decide what projects to add to a work plan each year? How does the District ensure that capital projects are planned while at the same time providing necessary budgeting for staffing and maintenance? Capital improvement planning is a helpful way for the District to prioritize and select projects in a transparent and consistent way. In general, capital improvement planning is a process used to identify capital needs, establish project priorities, and to schedule and fund projects to either construct or improve existing or new facilities. The result of the process is a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP includes a list of specific project recommendations, costs, prioritization, schedule, and funding sources. The capital project recommendations provide a sequenced vision for acquisition, development, renovation, and maintenance of parks, trails, and recreation facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 61 What is a Capital Improvement? A capital improvement project is a permanent structural change to a property or asset that increases its value, prolongs its life, or enhances its capabilities. A Capital Improvement is one piece of the District’s budget and does not include staffing, maintenance or general office related expenses. Within the District, the definition of Capital Improvement aligns with City of Belgrade policy and process: • Cost is $10K+ • >5 Year life expectancy Included within the above definition of a capital project are the following items: • Construction of new facilities • Remodeling or expansion of existing facilities • Purchase, improvement, and development of land • Operating equipment and machinery for new or expanded facilities • Planning and engineering costs related to specific capital improvements How will the District Use the Capital Improvement Plan? It prioritizes projects and can gauge District success. The District will use the CIP to inform budgeting decisions to ensure that new park spaces and facilities are developed in a cost-effective and transparent manner. The CIP also creates a process where project selection aligns with the Master Plan Mission and Values. It helps save money and track progress for large expenditure projects. The CIP can provide a road map to earmarking funds over time to implement large scale projects. It helps separate capital projects from the larger budgeting discussion. The District budget will allocate funds to other items in addition to capital improvements. For example, staffing needs, office costs, trainings. All these things must be budgeted for but are not considered capital projects. It can be reviewed periodically and integrated into a District work plan. The CIP should be reviewed and revised annually, to reflect changes in priorities, opportunities and circumstances. Before beginning the budget process, the plan is extended one year so that each time frame outlook is maintained. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 62 1. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING AND PRIORITIZATION Step 1 - Identify list of Capital Projects Proposed Capital Projects should be inventoried and cataloged by Department staff. In addition to a basic project description, a general order of magnitude cost estimate should also be included. The list of capital projects is expected to shift over time. As projects are completed and new opportunities are identified, capital projects are removed and added. The District should refer to the projects identified in this plan, staff recommendations, and new projects proposed by the public and maintenance annually. Step 2 - Project prioritization Once the list of capital projects is identified the District must work to determine a timeline for when projects are developed. The prioritization process involves Parks Department leadership, the Board, the City, the County, and the public. The process begins with the District and the Board evaluating potential projects using the CIP prioritization matrix. The completed CIP prioritization matrix and resulting list of proposed capital projects are presented to the commissions for feedback and approval. For each budget cycle, the top projects from the criteria matrix are proposed for funding and implementation. Step 3 - Add project cost estimates Once the projects are prioritized, additional effort is needed to refine project cost estimates including acquisition, design, construction, furnishings, equipment, and soft costs such as permitting, internal labor and benefits, risk contingency, and escalation. In addition to cost estimates, proposed capital projects should also include clear details of each project’s justification, net effect on the operating budget, and implementation schedule. Step 4 - Consider revenue projections This step requires a comprehensive analysis of the ability of the District to pay for the desired improvements as well as identifying outside grant or loan funding that might be secured for specific projects over time. This involves identifying the specific legal and administrative requirements that must be fulfilled, funding cycles and understanding any grant and loan program criteria, as well as District revenue projects. In this case, City of Belgrade will group Capital Improvements into time frames. For example: 0-2 yrs, 3-5 yrs, 6-10 yrs, 10-20 yrs Step 5 - Select Projects to include in work plan and CIP approval With the completion of the project prioritization, the local governing body typically adopts the CIP by resolution or ordinance after a public hearing. This process is separate from the annual budget review where Belgrade City Staff presents the budget to the Board of Directors for approval, followed by the Belgrade City Council and the Gallatin County Commission. Any capital projects approved in the CIP and flagged for implementation are then included in the District work plan. Step 6 - Review CIP annually CIP is then reviewed by the District annually. Were the projects completed as expected? Has a change occurred in circumstance that may impact prioritization or projected scheduling? ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 63 2. CIP PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA The CIP Prioritization criteria were developed to provide a framework for the District to evaluate potential capital projects and are based off the Plan goals. The criteria were used to create a Capital Project Prioritization Matrix. In the matrix, criteria aligning with multiple plan goals were weighted higher than the others due to their importance. Each proposed capital project should be evaluated using these criteria to understand which projects should be prioritized. A project may move up and down in prioritization scoring each year depending on new opportunities for funding and/or partnerships. The prioritization criteria should be evaluated annually or bi-annually to ensure they still meet the desires of the District. A sample Capital Project Prioritization Matrix is found in the Appendix. Prioritization Criteria Master Plan Value Does the project improve safety? Quality, Innovation Does the project address a community need? Planning, Innovation, Quality Is there an immediate opportunity for partnership? Planning Does the project connect to a larger recreation system? Connection Does the District have the resources to support the operation of the project? Transparency Is there a funding incentive? Transparency, Planning Is the project recommended by staff? Quality, Planning Is the project located in an underserved amenity area of the District? Quality, Planning ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 64 B. District Capital Improvement Plan Roadmap As a potential capital project moves through the Capital Improvement Planning process, costs will be estimated at each stage. 1. CAPITAL PROJECT COST STAGES Costs Estimate Stage 1 - Order of Magnitude This initial cost estimate is a way to consider general project costs in relation to one another early in the planning process. For the purposes of this plan, Order of Magnitude is used in the prioritization process. These estimates are meant to provide general direction on whether to move forward with a project in general when little detail is known. $ $1-$50,000 $50,000 – $300,000 $300,000 – $800,000 $800,000 – $1,500,000 $1,500,000 + Cost Estimate Stage 2 - Capital Improvement Plan Once a project has been identified as a priority improvement, additional cost estimation is needed in order for the project and associated costs, to be included in the city Capital Improvement Plan. According to guidance outlined in the State of Montana CIP Manual, potential capital project cost estimates should include the following: • Preliminary engineering (if not already completed), • Preparation of inventories of cultural/environmental resources (if necessary), • Selection of consultant, • Final design, • Preparation of bid documents, • Solicitation of bids and contractor selection, • Labor and materials, • Construction oversight, • Land purchases or right of way concerns, • Utility requirements, • Environmental mitigation, • Preparation of applications for grants and loans, and • Expenses related to obtaining a loan such as the issuance of a bond, holding an election, or forming a special district. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 65 2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDING STRATEGY A Capital Improvement Funding Strategy can be quite complex, with multiple sources of funds available and often with single projects funded by multiple sources. As capital project priorities are identified, it is recommended that a funding strategy is investigated and completed on a project specific basis. According to guidance from the American Association of Planners, most local officials think of the CIP as a plan for general obligation (GO) bond financing. GO bonds carry the lowest interest rates because they are full faith obligations of the issuer over a long term, typically 15 years or longer. They generally require a referendum; they are rated securities issued as tax exempt bonds. However, GO bonds are just one way to fund capital projects. “Paygo” financing of projects is usually an annual appropriation from general fund expenditures, carryover, or reserves. Since paygo funding does not involve the issuance of debt or payment of debt service, but relies on annual expenditure decisions, it is typically used for more modest capital projects. Revenue bonds are tax-exempt bonds that are underwritten based on an identified external source of revenue, e.g. recreational facilities fees, etc. Because revenue bonds are not general obligation financing, they generally do not count against the locality’s debt ceiling and should not affect the metrics used by the rating agencies. Some communities enter into lease-purchase agreements or public-private partnerships for the development of facilities. Such agreements can lower facilities costs through the use of tax deductions by a private developer and the deferral of some public costs into future years. They have the added benefit of not counting against the debt ceiling. Transfer payments from higher level governments in the form of formula returns or special grants may be dedicated to capital or infrastructure needs. States fund projects such as school construction or roadway improvements based on a funding formula tied to population, income, or other factors. ---PAGE BREAK--- 66 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Programming and Partnerships 06 Open House #1 ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 67 A. Programming Inventory and Core Programs 1. EXISTING PROGRAM INVENTORY District recreation programming is a foundational tenant to leading park districts nationwide. It’s no surprise that District led programs can provide new opportunities for residents to participate in recreation by removing cost or ability barriers that are typical in private programs. District led recreation programming can also inspire healthy lifestyles to residents through the exposure to new activities or through the creation of social connections that add to public health and general wellbeing. An inventory of existing programs offered by private clubs and organizations was completed and a comprehensive list was generated to understand desired programming, potential core programming, and the potential role the District could play in implementation. Currently, District facilities are used for events and recreation programs that are run by other organizations. There is public support for the creation of District run recreational programming, however, some of the facilities required to support these programs do not yet exist. 2. COMPARISON WITH NATIONAL STANDARDS As shown in the figures below from the NRPA 2024 Agency Performance Review, programs are highlighted across all park and recreation agencies. Although the District does not currently provide substantial programming, these exhibits should serve as an additional reference when reviewing potential programs. 68% 66% 63% 63% 62% 62% 56% 53% 49% 26% Aquatics Natural and cultural history activities Cultural crafts Visual arts Trips and tours Performing arts Martial arts Running/Cycling races Golf Esports/Egaming Source: NRPA 2024 Agency Performance Review ROGRAMMING OFFERED BY PARK AND RECREATION AGENCIES (PERCENT OF AGENCIES) 89% 88% 86% 82% 80% 76% 73% 70% Themed special events Social recreation events Team sports Fitness enhancement classes Health and wellness education Individual sports Safety training Racquet sports PROGRAMMING OFFERED BY PARK AND RECREATION AGENCIES (PERCENT OF AGENCIES) ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 68 3. ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS • Respondents would like to see more family-friendly, community-wide events and festivals be marketed broadly to the public. • Respondents desire a diversity of programming that is available year-round and serves a variety of ages and abilities. • Respondents desire affordable and accessible youth programming that promotes health and wellness. • Respondents desire classes, lessons, and camps alongside facility and place investments such as swim lessons and classes. • Responded identified youth-focused (ages 6-17 yrs.) programs sporting options, camps, and activities as a priority. 4. PROGRAM CATEGORIZATION AND PRIORITIZATION Ultimately, the number of program opportunities the District could initiate is vast. One way to focus effort is to establish a list of Core Programs that represent the topics that are most important to residents. In the following pages, programs are organized and considered under this lens to establish a preliminary list of core programs. Programming is organized into the following categories: • Sports and Recreation • Arts, Education, and Culture • Seniors • Fitness and Wellbeing Within each of these categories programs are analyzed to determine the following: • What programming currently exists in the District? • What programming is currently desired in the District? • What programming could be a core program? • What the proposed District role is in program implementation? Source: NRPA 2024 Agency Performance Review Percent of Agencies Less Than 20,000 20,000 to 49,999 50,000 to 99,999 100,000 to 250,000 More Than 250,000 Summer camps 83% 65% 86% 92% 84% 92% Specific senior programs 78 63 79 88 82 82 Specific teen programs 67 50 64 77 69 78 Programs for people with disabilities 66 37 62 78 75 86 STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) programs 57 41 49 66 59 74 After-school programs 52 44 41 51 58 71 Preschool 34 26 34 46 32 36 Before-school programs 19 17 17 23 15 22 Full-day care 7 7 2 8 6 12 TARGETED PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN, OLDER ADULTS AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES (PERCENT OF AGENCIES BY JURISDICTION POPULATION) 83% 65% 86% 92% 84% 92% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 69 These exhibits are intended to be working documents that the District reviews and re-evaluates periodically based on evolving community desires and fiscal realities. Within each of these categories, core programs are identified. Typically, core programs likely meet several of the below criteria: • It is valued by a large portion of the District • It can be offered most of the year • Full-time program staff will be dedicated to it • The District would control a large share of the local market • It would be a large portion of the District budget • Trends suggest this amenity is needed. • Current level of service suggests inadequacy within the community • Align with master plan goals • Difficult for other entities to create or sustain District Core Programming Recommendations (See additional in Programming Inventory Matrix) Baseball and Softball Youth Camps Multi-purpose Rooms Youth Classes Outdoor Performances Youth Basketball Aquatics Tennis & Pickleball Youth/Teen After School Programming Soccer Festivals Youth and Adult Softball ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 70 SPORTS AND RECREATION DISTRICT PROGRAMMING STATUS PROPOSED DISTRICT ROLE Name Existing Program Proposed Program Proposed Core Program Facility Creation Program Staff Maintenance Support Baseball (Adult) Club x x Baseball (HS Age) School x x Baseball (Youth) Club x x x Basketball (Adult) Club x x x x Basketball (HS Age) School Basketball (Youth) Club x x x x x Bowling Cycling Club Dodgeball (Adult) x x x x Equestrian Facility Golf Outside District Football (HS Age) School Football (Flag or Youth) Club x Utilize Existing x x Frisbee Golf x x x Hockey Club Kickball (Adult) x x x Lacrosse Club Utilize Existing x Biking (BMX, MTB) Club x x x Pickleball Club x x x x Rock Climbing/ Bouldering x Utilize Existing x Skiing (XC) x x x Soccer (Adult) Club x Utilize Existing x x Soccer (HS Age) School Soccer (Youth) Club x x Utilize Existing x Softball (Adult) Club x x x x x Softball (HS Age) School Softball (Youth) Club x x x x x Tennis Club, School Utilize Existing x Volleyball (Adult) Outside District x x x Wrestling School Ultimate Frisbee Club x Utilize Existing x x Programming Inventory Matrix ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 71 ARTS, EDUCATION, AND CULTURE DISTRICT PROGRAMMING STATUS PROPOSED DISTRICT ROLE Name Existing Program Proposed Program Proposed Core Program Facility Creation Program Staff Maintenance Support After School Outdoor Prog (Teen) Club x x Utilize Existing x x After School Outdoor Prog (Youth) Club x x Utilize Existing x x Art in the Park (Music, Theater, etc.) Club x x x x Art Studio School, Club Music Lessons School, Club Teen Activities Club x x x x x Youth Camps Club x x Utilize Existing x Wrestling School Ultimate Frisbee Club x Utilize Existing x x SENIORS DISTRICT PROGRAMMING STATUS PROPOSED DISTRICT ROLE Name Existing Program Proposed Program Proposed Core Program Facility Creation Program Staff Maintenance Support Bingo Senior Center Utilize Existing Birding x Utilize Existing x Card Games Senior Center Utilize Existing x Dancing Senior Center x Utilize Existing x x Music Lessons Senior Center Utilize Existing x x Gardening x x x x Trekking Pole Exercise x x x Programming Inventory Matrix ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 72 5. RECOMMENDATIONS Below are recommendations for recreational programming. As with all project and plan recommendations, they are based on the Programming Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. REC 6A.1 Create and invest in additional facilities that will increase available programming opportunities In order to provide additional programming that aligns with community desires and national standards, the District must invest in the required facilities. Most notably, and strongly supported by community feedback, these facilities include an aquatic center and recreation center. REC 6A.2 Understand program cost recovery and the full cost of running programs Cost recovery typically varies by the type of program. Core Programs typically have lower cost recovery than other programs. For all new program proposals, a cost-of-service analysis should be conducted that includes all indirect and direct costs. The cost-of-service analysis must include: Facility and equipment; Personnel and administration; Debt; Maintenance costs; and Third party contractors. After understanding the costs, anticipated revenue should be calculated. Revenue considerations include: Quantity of participants; Quantity and frequency of programs; and Required time. FITNESS AND WELLBEING DISTRICT PROGRAMMING STATUS PROPOSED DISTRICT ROLE Name Existing Program Proposed Program Proposed Core Program Facility Creation Program Staff Maintenance Support Aquatics Outside District x x x x x Community Gardening Outside District x x x Dance Club x x x x Dog Park x x x x x Fly Casting Club x Utilize Existing x Gymnastics Club x x x x x Ice Skating (outside) x Utilize Existing x Pilates Club x x x x Special Needs Rec Program x x Utilize Existing x Tai Chi Club, Library x x x x Hiking (Multi-use) Club x x x x Yoga (Standard and chair) Club x x x x Programming Inventory Matrix ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 73 REC 6A.3 Partner with the City of Bozeman Prior to making potentially large investments in the District, it is recommended that staff meet with the City of Bozeman Parks and Recreation Department to understand successes and failures in existing programs and what the District could learn from them. Additionally, it is also recommended that the District request program participation data from Bozeman to help inform interest level for various programs to help plan for the future. REC 6A.4 Establish an online platform that allows users to sign up for programs and events Utilizing an online platform to sign up and register for District programs and events will streamline process for admin time, improving participation, and increase user satisfaction. As mentioned later in Chapter 6, several online recreation management software options are mentioned as possible alternatives to explore. In addition to an online platform, the District should publish a seasonal copy of the District’s programs. This information is critical to create awareness of the programs. Ideally, the information would be distributed in both digital and print versions to reach the largest audience. REC 6A.5 Create a Core Program List The District should create a Core Program List based on community needs, current trends, and existing facilities. Through a public engagement effort specific to this topic, the District can learn just how important different program opportunities are for residents. Once a Core Program List is created, effort should shift towards a cost-of-service analysis for each potential program proposal. REC 6A.6 Create a Recreation Program Proposal Process A Program Proposal Process will provide the District with a consistent way to review and consider recreation program proposals. The creation of the process will also ensure that the District has all of the information necessary on staffing needs, cost of services, and required facilities. This process could include a form and must identify whether Board or Department approval is required. REC 6A.7 Collaborate programming with the Senior Center The Senior Center is a great community amenity and it is recommended that the District collaborates with staff on programming to ensure efforts are not duplicated. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 74 B. External Use and Event Guidelines for Park and Facility Rentals Sponsoring special events and providing facility rental opportunities can create an effective way to broaden service to residents, expand support for District priorities, and create additional funding streams. While the City of Belgrade has allowed the public to rent existing park facilities and spaces within the City, the new District includes many opportunities for use and rental outside city limits. 1. ATHLETIC EVENTS As new recreational facilities are planned, designed, and constructed opportunities to host athletic events are created. REC 6B.1 Partner with existing sports leagues and the Belgrade School District Partner with existing sports leagues and the Belgrade School District to learn what tournaments or events they are interested in and what facilities are necessary in order to host. In addition to field and equipment, events will also rely on the availability of parking, restrooms, concessions, and spectator seating. Include necessary facilities and amenities in design plans. 2. FILMING AND PHOTOGRAPHY REC 6B.2 Create a Film and Photography Permit Program Create a Film and Photography Permit Program to protect park facilities and avoid conflict with public use and enjoyment of the park. Specifically consider the use of drones. Refer to the National Park Service policy on Filming and Photography in parks. 3. SPECIAL EVENTS, (WEDDINGS AND CEREMONIES, FESTIVALS AND PICNICS) Gallatin County and the City of Belgrade each administer Special Event Permit programs. The creation of the District provides an opportunity to coordinate between jurisdictions to ensure that all events are safe and enjoyed by participants. REC 6B.3 Establish a Special Use/Event Permit system Establish a Special Use/Event Permit system to maintain the park’s integrity as a public space while also preventing unauthorized commercialization. Park event permit holders should be expected to follow all park rules, regulations, and guidelines to ensure that activities within the park are conducted in accordance with the District. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 75 C. Park and Facility Use 1. ADMINISTRATION FOR PARK RENTALS AND EVENTS The City of Belgrade currently administers a rental program through a Facilities/Amenity Permit and a Park Spaces Permit. According to staff, this program works well and should be maintained with minimal changes and expanded to include park spaces and facilities outside the city boundary but managed by the District. REC 6C.1 Create a User Group Request Form Create a User Group Request Form for groups interested in reserving and using park district facilities for an extend period of time. REC 6C.2 Expand the City Facilities/Amenity Permit and Park Use Permit program to the District Expand the City Facilities/Amenity Permit and a Park Use Permit program to include spaces outside the City but maintained by the District REC 6C.3 Create and adopt District Park Prohibitions Create and adopt District Park Prohibitions to include: • Ground marking requirements • Hours of operation • Sound restrictions (While the City of Belgrade does not have a noise ordinance, restrictions on noise will minimize conflicts with neighbors) • Alcohol (While the City of Belgrade does not have an open container law, restrictions on alcohol consumption may help keep liability insurance rates low and minimize conflicts.) • Event must comply with all county and state special event, food/beverage, sanitation requirements • Fee structure prioritizing District residents • Food Truck policy • Acknowledgment and provisions to help clarify limitations to liability. Special Use/Event Permit suggested parameters • Events or gatherings greater than 20 people require the prior permission of the District through the approval of a Special Use/Event Permit. • Events or gatherings that require catered food services, alcoholic beverages, amplified sound (if allowed) or third-party vendors also require prior permission of the District through the approval of a Special Use/Event Permit. • Cleanup fee • Damage/security deposit • Operations plan, parking, and traffic control • Additional documentation including: Certificate of Liability Insurance (COI), route maps for runs and walks, site plans for major events, vendor information for any food trucks involved with the event, plans for security, traffic, and waste management for large events ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 76 REC 6C.4 Review Liability Insurance Requirement Review Liability Insurance Requirement and applicability to all District managed park spaces and facilities outside city limits. Talk with City Attorney about additional insurance requirements: Personal and Advertising Injury, Property Damage. Provide a suggestion on how an applicant can obtain necessary insurance.- REC 6C.5 Create a District-wide facility Rental inventory Create a District-wide facility inventory available for rent and provide this information on a District webpage. Consider setting occupancy thresholds to aid in safety, minimize neighbor and parking conflicts and to establish rental fees. REC 6C.6 Update existing rental forms Update existing rental forms to include the following: • Cleanup fee • Damage/Security Deposit • Require additional documentation including: Certificate of Liability Insurance (COI), Route maps for runs and walks, Site plans for major events, Vendor information for any food trucks involved with the event, Plans for safety (EMS), security, traffic, and waste management for large events, and Special Event permit approval as needed. REC 6C.7 Include Administrative fee within rental rates Add an administrative fee on top of the rental fee to offset online permitting software costs. REC 6C.8 Fee Schedule Updates Conduct a park facility fee assessment and regular update to fee schedule. Consider following the City of Belgrade schedule for fee updates. 2. POTENTIAL SOFTWARE An online reservation booking system provides several benefits including increased convenience for customers, reduced administrative work, real-time availability updates, the ability to gather valuable customer data and the potential to boost revenue by allowing 24/7 booking access and streamlined reservation management. As the number of District facilities available for reservation increases and the District develops a recreation program, online reservations will become a necessary solution. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 77 There are many platforms available and its important for the District to understand what the administrative needs are before selecting and investing in a platform. According to suggestions taken from the NRPA, the District should keep the following in mind when considering software options: • Begin by making a list of required functionalities and other desired features, such as point-of-sale capabilities. • Ensure the software can grow with the District and includes features the District might use in the future. For example, facility use reports, permit statistics, social media integration and communication tools, etc. • Consider the costs of implementation and ongoing training or troubleshooting. Are those costs included in estimates? • Ask for referrals and feedback from users. • Weigh the costs and benefits of buying the software outright (customer service is usually included) or purchasing a cloud-based system. Usually cloud-based software costs recur City Works Currently used by the Belgrade City-County Planning Department Trimble City Works is a GIS-centric asset lifecycle management system. While not a parks and recreation specific platform, according to the website, it provides a solution for local governments, utilities, airports and public works agencies to manage and maintain infrastructure across the full lifecycle. The City of Belgrade is currently using this online platform for online permitting and licensing. Staff opinion is varied over the effectiveness of City Works to create efficiency and point to its limitations with point-of-sale capabilities and lack of compatibility with other City accounting software. Civic Plus - Rec1 Used by Rexburg ID, Butte Silverbow County MT, Idaho Falls ID According to their website, the platform empowers park and rec teams to manage activities, classes, events, facilities, volunteers, and payments with our CivicPlus Recreation Management software. The custom modules and integrations enable you to scale our software based on your needs and budget. RecTrac/WebTrac by Vermont Systems Used by Bend Parks and Recreation District, City of Missoula Parks and Recreation According to their website, RecTrac offers fully integrated parks and recreation management software to increase efficiency and productivity while providing extensive reporting and statistical data and an intuitive interface. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 78 D. Programming Partnerships and Funding To support the growth of the District, a diverse set of partnerships and funding mechanisms is necessary. It is recommended that time is invested in growing and expanding relationships at the local, state, and federal level to compare challenges and opportunities. As part of this, it is recommended to pinpoint how the District might support other entities or other entities might be able to support the District to meet its goals. If successful, this will ultimately require the development of detailed agreements but will greatly expedite the development and improvement of facilities throughout the District. 1. RECOMMENDATIONS Below are recommendations for programming and partnerships. As with all project and plan recommendations, they are based on the Programming Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. REC 6D.1 Collaborate with Agencies for core programs Meet with local, state, and federal organizations to explore the benefits of collaboration for core programming. REC 6D.2 Create a policy to require alignment with certain NRPA initiatives Use NRPA initiative documents to focus on key challenges with the District. Currently, NRPA offers more than a dozen initiatives that are accompanied with detailed reports and studies. Additional information can be found at: As seen in the Appendix a variety of potential partnerships are outlined and how they might be able to support the District. In addition to these partnership opportunities, and shown in the Appendix, a variety of grant opportunities exist and are outlined the adjacent exhibit. However, grant opportunities typically have greater availability for park and trail improvements rather than programming. Additionally, further funding mechanisms could include the following: • Advertising sales • Bonds • Corporate and private donations • Developer contributions through cash-in-lieu • Franchise fee for utility rights of way • Friends of the Park Group • Irrevocable remainder trusts • Lease backs • Private concessionaires operating with a land lease • Public-private partnerships • User fees and program fees ---PAGE BREAK--- 79 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Festival of Lights ---PAGE BREAK--- 80 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Governance and Administration 07 ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 81 A. Staff Position Descriptions As the District increases the number and variety of spaces under its care, ensuring that the facilities are maintained, and program needs are met will continue to increase in complexity. Developing a team of professionals, each with their own area of expertise, will be a key component to District success. Below are a number of positions and general job descriptions to consider adding to the Park Department team. 1. FACILITY COORDINATOR/PERMIT OFFICER Oversees, coordinates, participates in the preparation, scheduling, and use of required facilities for assigned programs and activities. Communicates with scheduled groups to confirm use of the facility and identifies the needs of the user group. Updates emergency and other pertinent information on a regular and as-needed basis. Coordinates and maintains the District’s permit processes; communicates policy, procedures, and requirements connected with event permits. Coordinates, plans, and executes all components of assigned events including the application process, event vendors, marketing, and oversight of event volunteers; coordinates other special events as assigned. Coordinators may collect and maintain records in a database. The records that coordinators may maintain can help them learn from past events or comply with governmental record-keeping requirements. Provides general office support, front desk, and general phone customer service. Initiates and coordinates the purchase of office supplies and equipment. 2. GRANT WRITER/CONTRACT MANAGER This position is responsible for researching, writing, and securing, monitoring, Federal, State, Local and Foundation grant proposals for District projects. Communicates with program staff and works collaboratively to conceptualize new projects. Participates in meetings as necessary for grant matters, including grant site visits, presentations, and meetings with potential grant providers/ funders. Identify funding opportunities and new program areas to match District priorities. Develops budget and financial report documents in collaboration with program and fiscal staff in compliance with grant requirements. Coordinates with Finance Department to account for all grant funds. Monitor and maintain government grant and contract documents. Ensures compliance and meets reporting requirements for existing grants. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 82 3. FACILITIES MANAGER (BUILDING and INDOOR COURT MAINTENANCE) Manages the Structures and Facilities program in the District: plans, coordinates, implements, and supervises a wide variety of building maintenance and repair tasks. Develops, recommends and implements a comprehensive facility management plan. Ensures that all facilities and systems are maintained to a high standard. Is responsible for overseeing and managing all park facility operations, including maintenance, security, and general cleanliness. Their duties and responsibilities include developing and implementing maintenance plans for park facilities, conducting routine inspections of park facilities, managing park maintenance staff, and ensuring compliance with local, state, and federal regulations related to park building operations and maintenance. They also perform daily walk-through duties, manage heavy equipment operation safety training, and coordinate larger maintenance needs. 4. GROUNDS MAINTENANCE MANAGER (LANDSCAPE and OUTDOOR FIELD MAINTENANCE) A Grounds Maintenance Manager oversees the maintenance, cleanliness, and overall appearance of the park, ensuring that trails, outdoor field facilities and equipment, and landscapes are well-kept and safe for visitors. They develop and implement park policies and regulations to protect outdoor areas and ensure visitor safety and satisfaction. Their duties and responsibilities include developing and implementing maintenance plans for park facilities and landscapes, overseeing routine inspections, managing park maintenance staff, and ensuring compliance with regulations. Assists with preparing the annual and biennial budget. Implements and monitors approved facility plan budget. Submits budget reports and analysis as requested. Coordinates purchase and delivery of supplies and services; maintains inventory control of park assets. Develops, recommends, and implements recommendations for program specific tools, vehicles, and small equipment. Coordinates maintenance and serves as resource for general maintenance, facility upgrades, and rehabilitation of parks. Works with professional consultants and City specialists to coordinate design, requests for proposal, and contractor selection processes as needed, prepares contracts, and ensures implementation of project goals and budgetary requirements, monitors contractor performance during construction and at completion of project for adherence to expectations. 5. RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER This position performs planning, implementation, coordination, and supervision of recreation programs, events, and activities, including planning, scheduling, and implementing recreational activities; recruits, coordinates, and supervises the activities of regular, temporary, and volunteer staff; prepares program budgets and monitor expenditures; administers the rental, scheduling, use and maintenance of recreation facilities; and performs related work as required. Develops and implements event and program budget; monitors program revenues and expenditures; oversees the coordination of contracts related to areas of responsibility; collects, counts, receives, and deposits cash and fees collected for programs. ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 83 6. COMMUNICATION MANAGER A Parks Communication Manager is responsible for overseeing the implementation of communications and marketing strategy in partnership with the District Board. They lead strategic and operational communications both internally and externally, delivering clear, consistent, and impactful messaging pertaining to District recreational programming and facility rentals. Excellent communication skills are critical for building relationships with the public. The role involves planning, creating, and delivering communications for District Parks through digital channels, campaigns, internal communications, public relations, and corporate communications. 7. PARK PLANNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A Park Planner is responsible for conducting park planning and acquisition studies, overseeing future master plan development and project management for construction projects within the District. They also review site plans for park and recreation area within new developments to ensure compliance with District standards and regulations. A Park Planner will also coordinate, monitor, and provide technical assistance at park and recreation construction sites, and develop plans for projects. 8. SPECIALTY: AQUATICS, NATURALIST, TRAILS and ARBORIST Management of some facilities and amenities may require a specialized skill set. For example, the operation and management of an aquatics center or the preservation of large native open space area, construction and maintenance of a trail network. As programs or facilities are developed, the District must include staff needs and include staffing request in budget projections. B. Engagement Findings • Respondents desire to see guidance and/or regulation for addressing improper use or behaviors at parks, trails, and facilities. • Respondents share that impacts on natural resources and wildlife should be considered at the forefront of any decisions. Respondents feel that the preservation of open spaces is a priority as the community grows to ensure quality of life for residents. • Respondents encouraged the coordination and partnership with stakeholders, institutions, and agencies, where possible, to realize goals. C. Park District Board Role The District is managed by Board and the City of Belgrade is required to manage all staff, services, and improvements. The Board is responsible for the governance of the District, subject to the direction and control of the Belgrade City Council and the Board of County Commissioners. The Board ensures that the budgeting and accounting requirements and fiscal obligations for the District are maintained. Each year Belgrade City Staff presents the budget to the Board for approval, followed by approval from the Belgrade City Council and the Gallatin County Commission. Further investigation regarding the role of the Board and potential updates to the Board By-Laws will be helpful. Specifically listing what matters will be brought before the Board for consideration and defining whether a majority vote is needed on any decision will clarify the Boards role in park development and provide transparency to the public on how decisions are made. For example, will proposed new parks within the District require review and approval by the Board? Or will the board consider requests to use Cash-In-Lieu of Parkland during development review? ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 84 1. RECOMMENDATIONS Below are recommendations for Park District Board Role. As with all project and plan recommendations, they are based on the Programming Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. See Chapter 8 – Implementation Action Plan for a full list of plan recommendations and implementation information. REC 7C.1 Complete a comprehensive facility management plan Complete a comprehensive facility management plan and develop a regular master plan update schedule. Typically, master plans are updated every 5-10 years. REC 7C.2 Clarify Board role and responsibilities Clarify Board role and responsibilities. Specifically include Board approval of proposed Capital Projects. ---PAGE BREAK--- 85 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE #2 ---PAGE BREAK--- 86 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Implementation Action Plan and Capital Project List 08 ---PAGE BREAK--- 87 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN A. Implementation Action Plan The following implementation matrix was created using the recommendations identified in this Master Plan. The District can use the matrix to ensure that plan recommendations are completed. The matrix is divided into plan Themes and identifies action items, key tasks, time frames, responsible departments and offices; and, if applicable, identities preliminary budget implications The time frames listed throughout this Implementation Matrix are as follows: • Immediate (0 to 2 years following adoption) • Medium (3 to 5 years following adoption) • Long (6 to 10 years following adoption) • Annual/Ongoing B. Capital Project List Many capital projects have been identified throughout the planning process. The following Capital Project List captures those projects in one place for reference. As with all project and plan recommendations, the capital projects included on the list are based on the Park Space Inventory, comparison to national standards, community engagement report findings, trends, and general professional opinion. The list combines projects recorded in the 2019 Belgrade Parks & Recreation Master Plan as well as new projects. In addition to a basic project description, the list includes a general order of magnitude cost estimate and any potential partnership or funding sources. Play structures at Lewis and Clark Park ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 88 ID Recommendation Responsibility Timeframe FACILITIES INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Places and Facilities REC 4D.1 Conduct District-wide Facility and Amenity Inventory Program Director Annual/Ongoing REC 4D.2 Establish recommended service levels standards for District Facilities Program Director Annual/Ongoing REC 4D.3 Cultivate strong partnerships and formal agreements with Local, State, and Federal agencies and organizations Program Director Immediate REC 4D.4 Seek corporate and individual funding and create donation opportunities Program Director Medium REC 4D.5 Integrate District priorities and plan goals into new parks associated with development applications Program Director Annual/Ongoing REC 4D.6 Meet with HOA’s to discuss their park space and potential partnerships Program Director Long REC 4D.7 Find and procure land for future park spaces Program Director Long REC 4D.8 Create Park Signage and Wayfinding Master Plan Program Director Long REC 4D.9 Create site Master Plans for all major parks in the system Program Director Long REC 4D.10 Prioritize areas in the District with low park equity Program Director Medium Pathways REC 4E.1 Identify solutions to improve access to the West Bridger Trailheads Program Director Long REC 4E.2 Establish regulations with Gallatin County and City of Belgrade that requires pathway connections to key community amenities within new developments Program Director Immediate REC 4E.3 Work with landowners and organizations to establish public access easements along important pathway corridors Program Director Long REC 4E.4 Meet with HOA’s to discuss recreation pathway connections and potential partnerships Program Director Medium Implementation Action Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- 89 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Implementation Action Plan (continued) REC 4E.5 Complete a District wide recreational trails Master Plan Program Director Immediate REC 4E.6 Consider adopting the Triangle Trails Plan and work with Gallatin County and the City of Belgrade to understand the role of the District in its implementation Program Director Immediate Park Requirements REC 4F.1 Establish minimum park design requirements for new parks developed within the District Program Director Immediate Facilities Maintenance Standards REC 4G.1 Create Maintenance Special Events and Sponsorship Programs Program Director Medium REC 4G.2 Develop Management Plans that describe maintenance standards, staffing responsibilities, and schedules Maintenance Supervisor Immediate REC 4G.3 Review “in-house” versus “outsourcing” of District maintenance costs Maintenance Supervisor Immediate REC 4G.4 Utilize a work order management system (WOMS) Maintenance Supervisor Immediate PROGRAMMING AND PARTNERSHIPS Programming Inventory and Core Programming REC 6A.1 Create and invest in additional facilities that will increase available programming opportunities Program Director Medium REC 6A.2 Understand program cost recovery and the full cost of running programs Program Director Immediate REC 6A.3 Partner with the City of Bozeman Program Director Immediate REC 6A.4 Establish an online platform that allows users to sign up for programs and events Program Director Medium REC 6A.5 Create a Core Program List Program Director Medium ID Recommendation Responsibility Timeframe ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 90 REC 6A.6 Create a Recreation Program Proposal Process Program Director Medium REC 6A.7 Collaborate programming with the Senior Center Program Director Immediate External Use and Event Guidelines REC 6B.1 Partner with existing sports leagues and the Belgrade Central School District Program Director Immediate REC 6B.2 Create a Film and Photography Permit Program Program Director Immediate REC 6B.3 Establish a Special Use/Event Permit system Program Director Immediate Park and Facility Use REC 6C.1 Create a User Group Request Form Program Director Immediate REC 6C.2 Expand the City Facilities/Amenity Permit and Park Use Permit program to the District Program Director Immediate REC 6C.3 Create and adopt District Park Prohibitions Program Director Immediate REC 6C.4 Review Liability Insurance Requirement Program Director Immediate REC 6C.5 Create a District-wide facility Rental inventory Program Director Immediate REC 6C.6 Update existing rental forms Program Director Immediate REC 6C.7 Include Administrative fee within rental rates Program Director Immediate REC 6C.8 Fee Schedule Updates Program Director Immediate Programming Partnerships and Funding REC 6D.1 Collaborate with Agencies for core programs Program Director Immediate REC 6D.2 Create a policy to require alignment with certain NRPA initiatives Program Director Immediate GOVERNANCE AND ADMINISTRATION Programming Partnerships and Funding REC 7C.1 Complete a comprehensive facility management plan Program Director Medium REC 7C.2 Clarify Board role and responsibilities District Board Immediate ID Recommendation Responsibility Timeframe Implementation Action Plan (continued) ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 91 ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 92 ID "Sub-Category or Location" Description "Order of Magnitude - Potential Partnerships or Funding Sources CIP 4D.1 Places and Facilities Relocate Lions Park baseball fields Partnerships: End user groups CIP 4D.2 Places and Facilities Develop Aquatic and Recreation Center Partnerships: YMCA; Local rec and swim clubs; Local jurisdictions; Local gyms CIP 4D.3 Places and Facilities Improve and integrate additional amenities at Belgrade Youth Sports Complex Partnerships: End user groups CIP 4D.4 Places and Facilities Implement a playground replacement program for all existing owned facilities CIP 4D.5 Places and Facilities Add field and court striping to existing amenities to meet level of service definitions $ Partnerships: Community groups and volunteers CIP 4E.1 Pathways Create a recreational and transportation path that links Bozeman to Manhattan Partnerships: County; MDT; Rail owner(s); GVLT; Trail clubs; Local jurisdictions CIP 4E.2 Pathways Create recreational pathways to improve access to fishing access site and the Gallatin River Partnerships: FWP, GVLT; Trail Clubs; County CIP 4E.3 Pathways Create an off-street recreational pathway loop surrounding the City of Belgrade Partnerships: County; Local Trail Clubs; GVLT CIP 4E.4 Pathways Implement a wayfinding and signage master plan Partnerships: County; Local Trail Clubs; GVLT; Local jurisdictions CIP 4E.5 Pathways Connect existing Meadowlark Ranch Pathway to DNRC property through an agreement with the Airport Partnerships: County; Local Trail Clubs; GVLT; Local jurisdictions CIP 4G.1 Facilities maintenance standards Secure land for a future District maintenance facility Capital Project List ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 93 ID "Sub-Category or Location" Description "Order of Magnitude - Potential Partnerships or Funding Sources CIP 2019.01* Children’s Park Add perimeter walk $ CIP 2019.02* Children’s Park Add perimeter fencing, trash can, new seating, park signage, sidewalks, and new play equipment CIP 2019.03* Clarkin Park Add sidewalk along West Madison Street and crossing at entry driveways $ CIP 2019.04* Clarkin Park Add sidewalks, park signage at parking, parking lot crossing and landscaped islands, vegetative buffers, gazebo maintenance, new seating, relocate organization sign CIP 0.1 Henson Park Create dog park in Henson Neighborhood CIP 2019.06* Kathy Hollensteiner Memorial Park Add vegetative buffer, bike racks, and trash can at shelter $ CIP 2019.07* Kiwanis Park Add crosswalk and sidewalk $ CIP 2019.08* Kiwanis Park Install sidewalk, fencing, pave parking lot, add park signage, and improve turf CIP 2019.09* Lewis and Clark Park Crosswalk striping, complete crossing study at Main Street for improved crossing treatment, upgrade bathrooms, add perimeter sidewalks, and add fencing along Main Street across from playground CIP 2019.10* Lewis and Clark Park Add sidewalks, vegetative screens, remove tennis court and replace with turf, repair shelters, replace signage, update play equipment, utilize concessions stand Capital Project List (continued) * From 2019 Belgrade Parks and Recreation Master Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 94 CIP 0.2 Mayfair Meadows Park Implement Master Plan at Mayfair Meadows Park Partnerships: Local trail and bike clubs CIP 2019.12* McMillan Park Add vegetative buffer, park signage, and coordinate with local residents for added features or activities $ CIP 2019.13* Memorial Park Add sidewalks, install crosswalk CIP 2019.14* Memorial Park Add new play equipment, park signage, playground signage, trees, mailbox pull- out area with landscaping, new seating, improve turf CIP 2019.15* Miller Park Add crosswalks $ CIP 2019.16* Miller Park Add sidewalks, park signage, playground signage, and bike racks $ CIP 2019.17* Prairie View Park Add perimeter sidewalks, crosswalks $ CIP 2019.18* Prairie View Park Add restrooms, water fountain, sidewalks, trash can, park signage, playground signage, and mailbox pull-out area with landscaping, and repair fencing CIP 2019.19* Prescott Park Add sidewalks to access the park before development CIP 2019.20* Quinella Park Add sidewalks along Quinella Street $ CIP 0.3 Quinella Park Develop mini arboretum and nature walk at Quinella Park $ CIP 2019.21* Ryen Glenn Park Add water fountain, grills at shelter $ CIP 2019.22* Sunnyside Park Add sidewalks $ ID "Sub-Category or Location" Description "Order of Magnitude - Potential Partnerships or Funding Sources Capital Project List * From 2019 Belgrade Parks and Recreation Master Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 95 CIP 2019.23* Sunnyside Park Add natural surface trail, park signage, bike racks, and seating $ CIP 2019.24* Triangle Park Add perimeter sidewalks and crosswalks $ CIP 2019.25* Triangle Park Remove tree, add trees, mailbox pull-out area with landscaping, and park signage $ CIP 2019.26* Winter Park Add sidewalks, fencing, and crosswalk $ CIP 2019.27* Winter Park Add vegetative buffer, trash can, park signage, mailbox pull-out area with landscaping CIP 0.4 Belgrade Unnamed Park #1 Add parking and dog park amenities for area #12 on Park Space Inventory ID "Sub-Category or Location" Description "Order of Magnitude - Potential Partnerships or Funding Sources Capital Project List (continued) * From 2019 Belgrade Parks and Recreation Master Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- 96 BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Appendix 09 ---PAGE BREAK--- BELGRADE REGIONAL PARKS, TRAILS, AND RECREATION DISTRICT MASTER PLAN 97 A. Engagement Summary B. Triangle Trails Master Plan Trail Design (select pages) C. Site Specifications (see Section 3.3) D. Capital Improvement Planning Prioritization Score Sheet E. District Incorporation Documents F. Grants and Partnerships G. Facility and Amenity Inventory H. Belgrade Regional Parks, Trails, and Recreation District Board Meeting Minutes ---PAGE BREAK--- Contact Us [PHONE REDACTED] beheardbelgrade.com 91 East Central Avenue Belgrade, MT 59714