Document Anaheim_doc_ff95f32d80

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE REVISED PLATINUM TRIANGLE EXPANSION PROJECT FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. [PHONE REDACTED] PREPARED FOR THE PLATINUM GATEWAY PROJECT Volume I Prepared for: City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Prepared by: Templeton Planning Group 20250 Acacia Street, Suite 260 Newport Beach, CA 92660 December 3, 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE REVISED PLATINUM TRIANGLE EXPANSION PROJECT FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. [PHONE REDACTED] PREPARED FOR THE PLATINUM GATEWAY PROJECT Lead Agency: CITY OF ANAHEIM 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Contact: Vanessa Norwood, Associate Planner (714) 765-4934 Prepared By: TEMPLETON PLANNING GROUP 20250 Acacia Street, Suite 260 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact: Vanessa Yee, Senior Project Manager (949) 724-0640 DECEMBER 3, 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project i Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Scope 1-1 1.2 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR 1-3 1.3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 1-4 1.4 Summary of Findings 1-5 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 Location of Project 2-1 2.2 Project Characteristics 2-1 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 3-1 3.1 Aesthetics 3-3 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 3-7 3.3 Air Quality 3-8 3.4 Biological Resources 3-16 3.5 Cultural Resources 3-17 3.6 Geology and Soils 3-19 3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3-23 3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3-30 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality 3-33 3.10 Land Use and Planning 3-41 3.11 Mineral Resources 3-49 3.12 Noise 3-50 3.13 Population and Housing 3-55 3.14 Public Services 3-57 3.15 Recreation 3-63 3.16 Transportation/Traffic 3-66 3.17 Utilities and Service Systems 3-85 3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance 3-96 3.19 Cumulative Impacts 3-96 4.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED 4-1 4.1 City of Anaheim (Lead Agency) 4-1 4.2 Project Applicant 4-1 4.3 Applicant’s Consultants 4-1 4.4 Environmental Consultant 4-2 5.0 LIST OF REFERENCES 5-1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project ii Table of Contents (Continued) Section Page 6.0 LIST OF APPENDICES (BOUNDED SEPARATELY IN VOLUME II) A. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION B. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT C. PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT D. PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN E. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS UPDATE F. PRELIMINARY ON-SITE SEWER SYSTEM STUDY ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project iii List of Exhibits Exhibit Page 2.1-1 REGIONAL LOCATION 2-2 2.1-2 VICINITY MAP 2-3 2.1-3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 2-4 2.2-1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 2-11 2.2-2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2-12 2.2-3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2-13 2.2-4 LANDSCAPE PLAN 2-15 3.1-1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 3-5 3.9-1 EXISTING HYDROLOGY MAP 3-35 3.9-2 PROPOSED HYDROLOGY MAP 3-37 3.16-1 OPENING YEAR (2016) PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3-77 ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project iv List of Tables Table Page 2.2-1 COMPARISON OF PROPOSED PROJECT TO PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT 2-9 2.2-2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS 2-10 2.2-3 PARKING SUMMARY 2-14 3.6-1 SUMMARY OF MAJOR ACTIVE FAULTS 3-21 3.13-1 ESTIMATED POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT GENERATION FOR THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE 3-56 3.14-1 ACSD AND AUHSD STUDENT GENERATION RATES 3-60 3.16-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON 3-68 3.16-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 3-70 3.16-3 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION 3-71 3.16-4 OPENING YEAR (2016) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 3-74 3.16-5 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 3-76 3.16-6 CALTRANS METHODOLOGY LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 3-79 ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 1-1 11 1 Introduction and Summary 1.1 Purpose and Scope This document, Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (State Clearinghouse No. [PHONE REDACTED]) Prepared for the Platinum Gateway Project (hereinafter referred to as the “Addendum”) has been prepared to demonstrate that there are no new significant environmental effects nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects associated with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project (Project No. DEV2012-00059) than those effects identified by the previously-certified Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (State Clearinghouse No. [PHONE REDACTED]), to be referred to as “FSEIR No. 339” throughout this document. FSEIR No. 339 was prepared by the City as the environmental documentation for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan, Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone, Platinum Triangle Standardized Development, and related zoning reclassifications to allow the following maximum development intensities within the 820-acre Platinum Triangle: General Plan Land Use Designation Permitted Density Mixed Use 18,909 residential dwelling units 4,909,682 square feet of commercial development 9,862,166 square feet office development 1,500,000 square feet institutional development Office High and Office Low 4,478,356 square feet Institutional 3.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Industrial 0.5 FAR Open Space 0.1 FAR On October 26, 2010, City Council certified FSEIR No. 339, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C for the PTMLUP. Implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Project includes, but is not limited to implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan subdivision maps, grading permits, street improvement plans, final site plans, development agreements, financial mechanisms including but not limited to assessment districts, etc.). ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 1-2 The proposed Platinum Gateway Project, which is described in detail in Section 2.0 of this Addendum, would allow for the development of a four-story “wrap-style” residential building consisting of 399 dwelling units with a five-story parking structure and public park on a 7.01- acre site within the Platinum Triangle. When compared to the development intensity permitted by the General Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and Development Agreement No. 2007-00002, the Platinum Gateway Project proposes 79 more residential units than permitted on the project site. In addition, the proposed project would not develop 209,419 square feet of office development and 114,571 square feet of commercial development, currently permitted for the project site. Therefore, amendments are proposed to the General Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and Development Agreement No. 2007-00002 to reflect the proposed development intensity of the Platinum Gateway Project. The development intensity analyzed by FSEIR No. 339 for properties within the Platinum Triangle designated for mixed use land use and the proposed development intensity within the Platinum Triangle that includes the change in development intensity proposed by the Platinum Gateway Project are as follows: Mixed Use Land Use FSEIR No. 339 With Proposed Project Difference Residential (Dwelling Units) 18,909 18,988 +79 Office (Square Feet) 9,862,166 9,652,747 -209,419 Commercial (Square Feet) 4,909,682 4,795,111 -114,571 Institutional (Square Feet) 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 The PTMU Overlay Zone requires the property owner to provide an on-site public park for all residential development of more than 325 units on parcels eight acres or larger. The Platinum Gateway Project includes an approximate 0.40-acre park; therefore, amendments to the General Plan and the PTMLUP are proposed to reflect the location of the proposed public park within these documents. Although the requirement for the public park was analyzed by FSEIR No. 339; the proposed location was not specified in FSEIR No. 339. With the exception of the minor increase in residential development intensity, decrease in office and commercial development intensities and the location of the proposed public park, there are no other changes to the project analyzed by FSEIR No. 339. This Addendum together with all other environmental documents incorporated by reference herein, serve as the environmental review of the proposed project, as required pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. the State CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations 15000 et. seq. and the City of Anaheim procedures of the implementation of CEQA. Pursuant to California Code of Regulations Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency charged with the responsibility of determining whether the proposed project will result in new information or new significant effects which were not previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339, thus requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR. As ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 1-3 part of the decision making process, the City is required to review and consider the potential environmental effects that could result from implementation of the project. The City, as the Lead Agency, has the authority for project approval and certification of the accompanying environmental documentation. 1.2 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be prepared “if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Pursuant to Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent EIR may be required for the project unless the City determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that one or more of the following conditions are met: 15162: Where an EIR or Negative Declaration has been prepared, no subsequent EIR need be prepared unless: Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 1-4 Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 15163: The Lead or Responsible Agency may choose to prepare a supplement to an EIR rather than a subsequent EIR if: Any of the conditions described in Section 15162 would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation. 15164: The Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. 1.3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Section 3.0 of this Addendum compares the anticipated environmental effects of the proposed project with those disclosed in the previous EIR and reviews whether any of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR are met. Section 3.0 analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed project for each of the following environmental topic areas:  Aesthetics  Agriculture and Forestry Resources  Air Quality  Biological Resources  Cultural Resources  Geology and Soils  Greenhouse Gas Emissions  Hazards and Hazardous Materials  Hydrology and Water Quality  Land Use and Planning  Mineral Resources  Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 1-5  Population and Housing  Public Services  Recreation  Transportation/Traffic  Utilities and Service Systems Section 3.0 provides information and analysis upon which the City of Anaheim has based its determination that no subsequent EIR is required for the proposed project. 1.4 Summary of Findings Based on the environmental analysis prepared for the project (provided in Section 3.0), the project would not result in any new significant impacts which were not previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-1 2 Project Description 2.1 Location of Project As shown on Exhibit 2.1-1, Regional Location, the project site is located within southern Anaheim, in the north/central portion of Orange County, in Southern California. Regional access is provided from the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway and Orange (SR-57) Freeway. More specifically, the project site consists of 7.01 acres located on the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street at 905, 915 and 917 East Katella Avenue within the Platinum Triangle in the City of Anaheim, as shown on Exhibit 2.1-2, Vicinity Map. The project site includes four parcels of land, APN No.’s 082-261-23, 082-269-02, 082-261-04, and 082-269-03. The project site is generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties in all directions. It is bounded by Omni Duct to the north, Mr. Stox Restaurant and an industrial building with multiple tenants including Axxis Motorsports to the east, Test American Drilling Corporation, Brownco Construction, Marmonite Masonry, and a former Unocal gas station to the south across East Katella Avenue, and Trafalgar Travel Agency and the Orange County Register across South Lewis Street to the west. An aerial photograph of the project site is shown on Exhibit 2.1-3. 2.2 Project Characteristics 2.2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND The City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency for this Addendum. Since 1996, the Anaheim City Council has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle. FEIR No. 320 On May 30, 1996, the Anaheim Planning Commission certified Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) No. 320 (State Clearinghouse No. 95041029) and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for the portion of the Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums; 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses; a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet); a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center; 250,000 square feet of office development; and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the renovated Angel Stadium of Anaheim, and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were developed/renovated under this plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 2.1-1 REGIONAL LOCATION 0 2.5 mi 5.0 mi Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P Diamond Bar Corona Laguna Beach Newport Beach Pacific Ocean Huntington Beach Long Beach Garden Grove Santa Ana Anaheim Placentia Fullerton Brea Yorba Linda Irvine Los Angeles Los Angeles Co. Orange Co. San Bernardino Co. Orange Co. Riverside Co. Orange Co. 60 60 15 91 91 57 55 22 5 405 5 55 5 605 90 261 73 241 241 133 133 PROJECT SITE ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 2.1-2 VICINITY MAP Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P The Platinum Triangle Boundary Platinum Gateway Project Area Source: FSEIR No. 339 ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 2.1-3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P SOUTH LEWIS STREET EAST HOWELL AVENUE AMTRAK SOUTH CLAUDINE WAY PROJECT PROJECT SITE SITE AUBURN WAY EAST GENE AUTRY WAY SOUTH BETMOR LN SANTA ANA FREEWAY SOUTH ANAHEIM WAY EAST KATELLA AVENUE Project Boundary Source: Google Earth ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-5 Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan (MLUP) & FEIR No. 321 On March 2, 1999, the Anaheim City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan (MLUP). The boundaries for this MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that this MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to I-5 that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the Anaheim Stadium Area MLUP, the City Council also certified FEIR No. 321 (State Clearinghouse No. 9611041) and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the Anaheim Stadium Area was implemented through the Sports Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone, which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of this Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space; 452,026 square feet of new retail space; and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology. City of Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update & FEIR No. 330 On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update changed the General Plan designations within the project area from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space, and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensity for the Platinum Triangle to be up to 9,175 dwelling units; 5,000,000 square feet of office space; 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses; industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50; and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 were incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final EIR No. 330 (State Clearinghouse No. [PHONE REDACTED]), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development intensities on a citywide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including an Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle. Platinum Triangle MLUP (PTMLUP) & Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone In order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, on August 17, 2004, the City Council replaced the Anaheim Stadium Area MLUP with the Platinum Triangle MLUP (PTMLUP); replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone; approved the form of the Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement; and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under these updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions are required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-6 the City of Anaheim. Ordinances associated with the PTMU Overlay Zone and the approved zoning reclassifications became effective September 23, 2004. FSEIR No. 332 On October 25, 2005, the Anaheim City Council adopted and certified the Final Subsequent EIR (FSEIR) No. 332 (State Clearinghouse No. [PHONE REDACTED]) including an Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106A for the PTMLUP and associated actions, which utilized the certified FEIR No. 321 (adopted for the Anaheim Stadium MLUP, as discussed above) and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. The General Plan Amendment associated with FSEIR No. 332 increased the allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units; 5,000,000 square feet of office uses; and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses. The City Council approved two addendums to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units; 55,550 square feet of office development; and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project EIR was also approved to increase the allowable development intensity by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to up to 10,266 residential units; 5,055,550 square feet of office uses; and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses. FSEIR No. 334 In order to increase the overall densities within the Platinum Triangle to accommodate market demand and to further the project objectives, in 2007, the City embarked upon a process to adopt a General Plan Amendment; amendments to the PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development; and related zoning reclassifications (hereafter, the “Platinum Triangle project”). However, following the approval of the project and the associated environmental impact report (FSEIR No. 334), a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. In consideration of the City’s historical record in avoiding CEQA litigation and its commitment to proper environmental review, the City Council repealed the approval of the project and directed staff to prepare a new subsequent EIR for the “Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project.” FSEIR No. 339 FSEIR No. 339 was prepared by the City as the environmental documentation for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan, Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone, Platinum Triangle Standardized Development, and related zoning reclassifications to allow the following maximum development intensities within the 820-acre Platinum Triangle: ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-7 General Plan Land Use Designation Permitted Density Mixed Use 18,909 residential dwelling units 4,909,682 square feet of commercial development 9,862,166 square feet office development 1,500,000 square feet institutional development Office High and Office Low 4,478,356 Institutional 3.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Industrial 0.5 FAR Open Space 0.1 FAR On October 26, 2010, City Council certified FSEIR No. 339, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C for the PTMLUP. Implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Project includes, but is not limited to implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan subdivision maps, grading permits, street improvement plans, final site plans, development agreements, financial mechanisms including but not limited to assessment districts, etc.). Permitted Land Use and Development Table LU-4: “General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City” of the Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates the maximum development intensity for each of the land use designations permitted within the Platinum Triangle. The Platinum Gateway Project Site is designated for mixed use land use by the General Plan. The maximum permitted development intensity for the Mixed Use Land Use Designation within the Platinum Triangle is up to:  18,909 residential dwelling units  4,909,682 square feet of commercial development  9,862,166 square feet office development  1,500,000 square feet institutional development The PTMLUP and PTMU Overlay Zone further divide the portions of the Platinum Triangle designated for Mixed Use Land Use by the General Plan into seven mixed-use districts. The Platinum Gateway Project is located within the Katella District. This district allows for the development of up to:  5,707 residential dwelling units  832,614 square feet of commercial development  2,131,058 square feet office development Appendix G: PTMU Overlay Zone District Sub-Area Development Intensity Maps, of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, indicates the permitted amount of development for certain areas within the Platinum Triangle. The Platinum Gateway Project is located within Katella District Sub-Area A, which permits development of the project site with up to: ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-8  320 dwelling units  114,571 square feet of commercial development  209,419 square feet of office development An approved final site plan and a development agreement between the property owner and the City of Anaheim are required for all development under the PTMU Overlay Zone. The final site plan application is submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director as to conformance with the provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone and the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. The approved Final Site Plan is then attached as an exhibit to the Development Agreement and submitted to the Planning Commission and the City Council for review at a noticed public hearing. In 2008, Development Agreement No. 2007-00002 was executed to govern the development of a mixed use project on the Platinum Gateway Project Site. The approved project consists of a 320- unit condominium complex, a 12-story, 209,419 square foot office building, including a 5,586 square foot full-service restaurant, 4,381 square feet of retail space, and a 138-room hotel. 2.2.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS The Platinum Gateway Project requires the following discretionary approvals by the City of Anaheim: 1) An amendment to the City of Anaheim General Plan to amend Table LU-4: “General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City” to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the Mixed Use land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and amend the Land Use, Circulation and Green Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park for this project site. 2) An amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to reflect an increase in the total number of dwelling units; a reduction in the commercial square footage; a reduction in office square footage; and, an addition of a public park. 3) An amendment to Chapter 18.20.040 of the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code to revise Table 20-D Development Intensities: (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone to reflect an increase in the permitted number of dwelling units; reduce the permitted amount of commercial square footage; and, reduce the permitted amount of office square footage. 4) Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2007-00002 between the City of Anaheim and Ronald W. Marshall Trust, Deborah L. Marshall Trust, Marshall Family Trust, Charles B. Marshall Trust, and Susan M. Marshall Trust to address the project redesign, including a revised product type and site layout. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-9 5) A tentative tract map to reflect the redesign of the Platinum Gateway Project and the adjacent Platinum Vista Project (Project No. DEV2012-00060) and the addition of the proposed public park. Approval of the Platinum Gateway Project would allow the development of a four-story “wrap- style” residential building consisting of 399 dwelling units with a five-story parking structure and a public park on a 7.01-acre site. The proposed density for the site is 57 residential units per acre. No office or commercial uses are proposed. The Conceptual Site Plan is shown on Exhibit 2.2-1. The Tentative Tract Map is shown on Exhibit 2.2-2. As shown on Table 2.2-1, when compared to the development intensity permitted by the General Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and Development Agreement No. 2007-00002, the Proposed Project would result in an increase of 79 residential units and a reduction of allowable office and commercial development by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet, respectively. Table 2.2-1 Comparison of Proposed Project to Permitted Development Land Use Permitted Development Proposed Project Difference Residential (Dwelling Units) 320 399 +79 Office (Square Feet) 209,419 0 -209,419 Commercial (Square Feet) 114,571 0 -114,571 The PTMU Overlay Zone requires the property owner to provide an on-site public park for all residential development of more than 325 units on parcels eight acres or larger. The Platinum Gateway Project includes an approximate 0.40-acre park; therefore, amendments to the General Plan and the PTMLUP are proposed to reflect the location of the proposed public park within these documents. The Platinum Gateway Project includes a total of 8 studio units, 191 one-bedroom units, 152 two-bedroom units, 39 three-bedroom units, and 9 three-bedroom plus loft units. The elevations from East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street on Exhibit 2.3-3, Building Elevations show details on the architectural design proposed. A summary of the proposed floor plans is provided in Table 2.2-2. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-10 Table 2.2-2 Summary of Proposed Floor Plans Plan Type Type # of Units Average Square Footage % of Mix Total Square Footage Plan S1 Studio 8 561 2.0% 4,488 Plan A1 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 32 683 8.0% 21,856 Plan A1-A 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 14 706 3.5% 9,884 Plan A2 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 16 708 4.0% 11,328 Plan A4 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 93 803 23.3% 74,679 Plan A5 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 36 829 9.0% 29,844 Plan B1 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 51 1,040 12.8% 53,040 Plan B2 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 18 1,050 4.5% 18,900 Plan B3 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 43 1,163 10.8% 50,009 Plan B6 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 40 1,208 10.0% 48,320 Plan C1 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 11 1,310 2.8% 14,410 Plan C2 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 28 1,400 7.0% 39,200 Plan C1-L 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 3 1,460 0.8% 4,380 Plan C2-L 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 6 1,550 1.5% 9,300 TOTAL 399 100% 389,638 Source: Architects Orange, July 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 2.2-1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 0 40’ 80’ Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P LEGEND Source: Architects Orange ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 2.2-2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17494 0 50’ 100’ Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P Source: Hall & Foreman, Inc. PLATINUM VISTA (NOT A PART) ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 2.2-3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 0 18’ 36’ Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P Source: Architects Orange Elevation 1: View looking north from E. Katella Avenue. Elevation 2: View looking east from S. Lewis Street. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 2-14 Additionally, the PTMU Overlay Zone requires 731 parking spaces for the Platinum Gateway Project. A total of 741 parking spaces are proposed, including 21 street spaces, 6 surface spaces, and 714 spaces within the parking structure, as shown in the parking summary in Table 2.2-3. Table 2.2-3 Parking Summary Unit Type Number of Units Stalls/Unit Required Parking Studio 8 1.25 10 1 Bedroom 191 1.50 287 2 Bedroom 152 2.00 304 3 Bedroom 39 2.50 98 3 Bedroom + Loft 9 3.50 32 Total Parking Required 399 N/A 731 Street Parking 21 Surface Parking 6 Parking Structure 714 Total Parking Proposed 741 Source: Architects Orange, July 2012. The landscape plan, shown in Exhibit 2.2-4, provides detail to the location and type of trees to be planted within the project site. Palm trees along East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street will include Phoenix dactylifera (Date Palm), and Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm). Street trees along East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street will include Tristania conferta (Brisbane Box), Prunus species (Plum), Lagerstroemia indica (Crape and Cercidium species (Palo Verde). The Connector Street trees will include Podocarpus gracilior (Fern Pine), Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm), Liriodendron tulipifera (Tulip Tree), Tristania conferta (Brisbane Box), Magnolia g. ‘St. Mary’ (Magnolia), Prunus species (Plum), Lagerstroemia indica (Crape and Cercidium species (Palo Verde). With the exception of the proposed increase of 79 residential units, reduction of office and commercial development by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet, respectively, and specifying the location of the proposed public park, there are no other differences between the Platinum Gateway Project and the development analyzed by FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 2.2-4 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 35’ 70’ Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P Source: TheCollaborativeWest ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-1 3 Environmental Analysis This portion of the Addendum examines each environmental topic analyzed in FSEIR No. 339 in relation to the Platinum Gateway Project. By definition, an addendum to a CEQA document is intended to demonstrate that the modifications to the previously approved project will not substantially increase the environmental impacts or create new significant impacts. With the exception of the proposed increase of 79 residential units, reduction of office and commercial development by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet, respectively, and specifying the location of the proposed public park, there are no other modifications to the project analyzed by FSEIR No. 339. Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be prepared “if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Pursuant to Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, for each environmental topic the following analysis includes a summary of the analysis in FSEIR No. 339, followed by a comparison to the anticipated effects of the Platinum Gateway Project and a determination as to whether a subsequent EIR is required for the project, based upon substantial evidence, that one or more of the following conditions are met: Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete show any of the following: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-2 Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The analysis includes existing regulations and standard conditions that will apply to the Platinum Gateway Project, as well as applicable mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C, adopted in conjunction with the certification of FSEIR No. 339. These mitigation measures have been compiled into Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307. In certain circumstances the measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C have been modified to reflect the Platinum Gateway Project. Deletions are shown in strikethrough and additions are shown in bold. Compliance with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307 will be a condition of approval for the Platinum Gateway Project. Based on the following substantial evidence, the Platinum Gateway Project would not result in any new significant impacts which were not previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-3 3.1 Aesthetics SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is highly urbanized with industrial, commercial, and recreational uses, which do not exhibit any significant geographic features or natural resources of importance. Although the development of the Platinum Triangle would result in an intensification of the existing urban character of the area through demolition or renovation of existing structures and construction of new structures, after mitigation, the impacts to aesthetic resources were not found to be significant. FSEIR No. 339 also did not identify any designated scenic resources or scenic highways within the project area. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project site is not characterized by unique visual resources, and no historic structures exist on the property. Therefore, no adverse impacts on designated scenic resources would result from the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. A transition from light industrial to mixed-use development within the Platinum Triangle is occurring through the development of residential, commercial, and office uses. Landmarks include man-made elements such as Angel Stadium of Anaheim and the Honda Center. Because of the predominately urban character of the Platinum Triangle, night-lighting is widespread and characterized by parking lot lighting; structural lighting for hotels and restaurants; overhead street lighting; vehicle headlights; sign/building illumination; and lighting during nighttime sporting events. Additionally, at the time of FSEIR No. 339 preparation, Angel Stadium of Anaheim, the Honda Center, and several high-rise office and residential uses created shade and shadows throughout the project area. FSEIR No. 339 identified that increased density and height would result in increased shadow and widths beyond the existing conditions at that time. The issue of shade and shadow pertains to the blockage of direct sunlight by on-site buildings, which affect adjacent properties. Shading is an important environmental issue because the users or occupants of certain land uses, such as residential, recreational, outdoor restaurants, and pedestrian areas have expectations for direct sunlight and warmth from the sun. According to FSEIR No. 339, compliance with design standards would reduce shade/shadow impacts by breaking up continuous shade lines. However, despite these design guidelines, there is a potential that over 50 percent of on- and off-site shadow-sensitive areas would experience shade/shadow effects for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. Future development projects, where adjacent uses are deemed shadow sensitive, would be required to demonstrate that their projects would not interfere with those uses’ exposure to natural sunlight, and incorporate design features that allow direct sunlight for at least 50 percent of the sun-sensitive areas for at least 50 percent of duration for the season, as appropriate. In order to visually unify the area, new mixed-use development within the Platinum Triangle would be required to adhere to the design standards and principles for the PTMU Overlay Zone. FSEIR No. 339 found that potential impacts related to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-4 Project could result in significant visual impacts that could be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY Visual Appearance The current visual character of this portion of the Platinum Triangle is characterized by low- and mid-rise commercial buildings, light industrial uses, and residential apartment/condominum complexes with varying architectural styles. Coverage of the project site is nearly complete with the existing tilt-up light industrial structure, associated paved parking and limited landscaping. The structure on the project site will be demolished as part of the proposed project. Photographs of the project site are shown on Exhibit 3.1-1. The proposed four-story residential development with a five-story parking garage and associated landscaping is consistent with the visual character of the existing surrounding land uses. For instance, the existing four-story Vivere condominium complex is located east of the project site at 1331 East Katella Avenue, and the existing five-story Park Viridian apartment homes complex is located to the east of Vivere at 1515 East Katella Avenue. Continuing east on Katella Avenue are several existing residential complexes similar to the Platinum Gateway Project. An amendment to the development agreement for the adjacent property to the east, Platinum Vista, located at 1005 – 1105 East Katella Avenue is currently being processed for the development of 350 residential dwelling units. Because of the in-fill nature of the proposed project and the compatible nature of the proposed project among similar scale buildings within this urban pattern, there are no significant visual impacts resulting from the construction of the proposed project. Shade and Shadow The residential buildings would be a maximum of 57 feet in height, and the garage would be a maximum of 62 feet and 5 inches in height, which does not exceed the maximum 100-foot height limit. The Platinum Gateway Project consists of 399 residential units, six landscaped courtyards, a club house, fitness center, and public park. The project’s design, building massing, and impacts are in conformity with those analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. FSEIR No. 339 also anticipated the effects of light and shadow on the surrounding environment, adding mitigation requiring applicants to demonstrate that their projects would not interfere with sensitive uses’ exposure to natural sunlight, and incorporate design features that allow direct sunlight for at least 50 percent of the sun sensitive areas for at least 50 percent of duration for the season, as appropriate. However, this measure does not apply to the Platinum Gateway Project because there are no adjacent shadow sensitive uses and; therefore, no significant impacts will occur. Light and Glare The security lighting for the proposed residential development and public park will create a new source of light and glare. However, the project would comply with the applicable provisions of ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 3.1-1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P Photograph 1: View looking northeast from the northwest corner of S. Lewis Street and E. Katella Avenue. Photograph 2: View looking northeast from the southeast corner of S. Lewis Street and E. Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-6 The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and PTMU Overlay Zone with regards to landscaping, lighting, and setback requirements. It is also anticipated that proper installments of light fixtures that include the necessary shielding, such as hoods, filtering louvers, and glare shields may be required to maintain proper lighting in the park facility without undue glare impacts on adjoining residential areas. Therefore, less than significant impacts associated with additional light and glare would result from project implementation. No mitigation measures are necessary. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that, with the implementation of the PTMLUP and the PTMU Overlay Zone, no unavoidable significant impacts related to aesthetics would occur. The proposed project includes the quality of design in accordance with City of Anaheim requirements and those analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. Therefore, the proposed project does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to aesthetics. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant aesthetic effects identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions Future development projects within the Platinum Triangle shall be required to comply with the planning principles and the urban design elements contained in the Platinum Triangle MLUP as ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-7 amended, and the development standards contained in the PTMU Overlay Zone (Chapter 18.20 of the Anaheim Municipal Code) as amended. 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to agriculture resources were identified through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to agricultural resources. FSEIR No. 339 did not provide specific analysis of forest resources. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency designates the project site as Urban and Built-Up Land.1 In addition, the project site is not currently used for agricultural production or under any Williamson Act contracts, and no such designated land is nearby. Therefore, no impacts to agricultural resources are anticipated. The project site is not defined as forest land according to Section 12220(g) of the California Public Resources Code, which defines forest land as “land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits,” nor is it zoned for Timberland Production as defined by Section 51104(g) of the California Government Code. The project site is currently developed with urban uses including an industrial building occupied by multiple tenants including Golden West Medical Center and associated paved parking. The project site does not contain any forest land and forest land would not be converted to non-forest use. Therefore, no impacts related to forestry resources are anticipated. Although the CEQA questions related to forestry resources were not on the checklist when the FSEIR No. 339 was prepared, there are no environmental impacts associated with this issue; therefore, this does not preclude the use of an addendum to the previous document. 1 Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program Website: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2010/ora10.pdf ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-8 Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant agriculture and forestry resources impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. 3.3 Air Quality SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FSEIR No. 339 analyzed air pollutant emissions associated with the Platinum Triangle area for build-out of the PTMLUP. Air pollutant emissions associated with new development occurring in the Platinum Triangle area would increase carbon monoxide (CO) emissions, volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), respirable particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10), and respirable particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) within the project vicinity. Short-Term Air Quality Impacts Associated with Construction Air pollutant emissions from construction activities were modeled using URBEMIS2007, and were included in Table 5.2-6 of FSEIR No. 339. The primary source of construction-related CO, SOx, VOC, and NOx emissions is gasoline- and diesel-powered, heavy-duty mobile construction equipment, such as scrapers and motor graders. The primary sources of PM10 and PM2.5 emissions is clearing and demolition activities, excavation and grading operations, construction ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-9 vehicle traffic on unpaved ground, and wind blowing over exposed earth surfaces. Air pollutant emissions generated from construction activities would cause temporary increases in air pollutant emissions that exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) threshold criteria for CO, NOx, VOC, PM10, and PM2.5. Therefore, FSEIR No. 339 concluded that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project’s construction impact was a Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council. Long-Term Air Quality Impacts Associated with Operation Operation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate air pollutants from stationary sources and mobile sources. The stationary source emissions from operation of the proposed land uses would come from its consumption of natural gas and electricity. FSEIR No. 339 indicated that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project at buildout would generate 443,263 average daily trips. Using the default emission factors included in URBEMIS2007, emissions associated with the project were calculated and included in Table 5.2-7 of FSEIR No. 339. As shown in this table, project-related emissions would exceed the SCAQMD daily emissions thresholds for CO, VOC, NOx, PM10 and PM2.5. Mobile sources represent the largest source of operational emissions for the project. Therefore, FSEIR No. 339 concluded that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project’s impact was considered a Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council. CO Hotspot Analysis Localized concentrations of air pollutant emissions associated with the new development occurring within the Platinum Triangle area would increase pollutant concentrations that could contribute to violations of federal and state ambient air quality standards (AAQS). Localized concentrations of pollutant emissions from operation of the Platinum Triangle were modeled using CALINE4, for their potential to contribute to CO hotspots and were included in Table 5.2- 8 of FSEIR No. 339. As shown in this table, localized concentrations of CO at congested intersections would not exceed the most stringent AAQS. Consistency with the AQMP FSEIR No. 339 included a consistency evaluation with the SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The consistency evaluation concluded that because the Master Land Use Plan would reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), the project is consistent with the AQMP. Odors FSEIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle area found that no significant impact from objectionable odors from construction or operation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would occur. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-10 IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY Short-Term Air Quality Impacts Associated with Construction Construction activities of the proposed project would have a short-term impact on air quality. Temporary construction emissions would result from demolition of the existing structure, pavement, and utilities, excavation, and grading activities, and from construction of the proposed project. No additional building demolition would be required to construct the additional 79 dwelling units. The proposed project would result in the construction of 79 additional dwelling units, air pollutant emissions of which were not previously analyzed in the FSEIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle. However, the proposed project would reduce the maximum development intensity for build-out of the PTMLUP by 209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial uses. Therefore, construction of the less intense project would decrease the duration of construction activities associated with the Platinum Gateway Project. As a result, the project would not increase the maximum daily air pollutant emissions generated during construction activities. The project would contribute to emissions of CO, NOx, VOC, PM10, and PM2.5 that exceed the SCAQMD’s construction emission thresholds identified in FSEIR No. 339 and therefore cumulatively contribute to the SoCAB’s ozone nonattainment designation, however, cumulative impacts would be less than those calculated under the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. The construction air emissions are anticipated to be less than those calculated in FSEIR No. 339 and would not result in any new significant impacts which were not previously anticipated. Operational Impacts The primary source of regional emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles. Other emissions would be generated from the combustion of natural gas for space heating and the generation of electricity. Emissions would also be generated by the use of natural gas and oil for the generation of electricity off-site. As discussed in Section 3.16, Transportation/Traffic, long term operational impacts associated with vehicle trips generated from the proposed project would be 72 percent less than the trips associated with the land uses for the site analyzed by FSEIR No. 339. The project would result in a reduction of 6,433 daily trips and 45,481 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as compared to the previously approved uses, since residential uses generate less trips than office and commercial uses. Since the primary source of operational emissions are the result of vehicle emissions, the reduction in daily volumes would result in a reduction in operational related air emissions. The operational air emissions from the additional 79 units would not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously anticipated. No new significant impacts would occur. CO Hotspot Analysis Localized air quality effects would occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase CO concentrations at congested intersections. As previously stated, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project would generate 6,433 less daily trips. Therefore, the additional 79 residential units proposed within the Platinum Gateway Project and reduction of 209,419 square feet of office ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-11 space and 114,571 square feet of commercial use would result in a decrease in the number of project-related vehicles at local intersections within the vicinity of the project. Further, the proportion of project-related vehicle trips is small in relation to the volume of traffic at local intersections. The project would not expose sensitive-receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and no new air quality impacts would occur. Consistency with the AQMP SCAQMD’s most recent adopted comprehensive plan is the 2007 AQMP, which was adopted June 1, 2007. However, SCAQMD has recently released a draft of the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (Draft 2012 AQMP), which is anticipated to be adopted in the fall of 2012. Regional growth projections are used by SCAQMD to forecast future emission levels in the SoCAB. For southern California, these regional growth projections are provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and are partially based on land use designations included in city/county general plans. Typically, only large, regionally significant projects have the potential to affect the regional growth projections. While the proposed project would result in an increase in population, it would also reduce employment in the City of Anaheim, and it would not substantially affect the regional growth projections. The project would reduce emissions and would not affect the regional emissions inventory or conflict with strategies in the AQMP to attain the AAQS. Because the project would increase the number of residential units by 79 units, the project would further reduce the VMT within the SoCAB and the project would be consistent with the AQMP. The proposed project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Odors During construction, potential odors would be generated by trucks and heavy-duty construction equipment used on site during demolition and construction. However, odors from the trucks and heavy-duty construction equipment used at the project site would be temporary and would cease to exist after construction is completed. Additionally, construction of the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Therefore, no new significant impact would occur. Conclusion The proposed project will reduce project intensity from that allowed in FSEIR No. 339 through the reduction of office and commercial uses. The Platinum Gateway Project will also produce 72% less trips than would be generated by the existing entitlements. Thus, because the project is building out at less than anticipated in FSEIR No. 339, short-term air quality impacts related to construction and long-term operational air emissions from vehicular traffic will be less than the air emissions projected in FSEIR No. 339. Additionally, implementation of FSEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures Nos. 2-1 through 2-6, which address emissions from grading, construction equipment operation and stationary sources will further reduce air quality impacts to less than significant. As a result, the Platinum Gateway Project does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to air quality. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-12 Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant air quality impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions SCAQMD Rule 201: Permit to Construct. SCAQMD Rule 402: Nuisance Odors. SCAQMD Rule 403: Fugitive Dust. SCAQMD Rule 1403: Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. CARB Rule 2480: Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) – Schools. CARB Rule 2485: Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) – Commercial Vehicles. Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24). Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20). Motor Vehicle Standards (AB 1493). ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-13 2007 AQMP. Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339 The following mitigation measures are taken from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation measures apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project. 2-1 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to reduce construction-related emissions; however, the resultant value is expected to remain significant. a) The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations to reduce operational emissions. b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, off-road construction equipment with higher air pollutant emissions standards for equipment greater than 50 horsepower, based on manufacturer’s availability. c) The contractor shall utilize existing power sources power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary diesel-power generators, where feasible. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-30, Mitigation Measure No. 2-1) 2-2 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall implement the following measures in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. To assure compliance, the City shall verify compliance that these measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections. The measures to be implemented are listed below: a) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering as quickly as possible to achieve a minimum control efficiency for PM10 of 5 percent. b) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall apply chemical soil stabilizers to on-site haul roads to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared to travel on unpaved, untreated roads. c) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. d) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. e) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall sweep streets with Rule 1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-14 units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. f) During active demolition and debris removal and grading, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall suspend demolition and grading operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to achieve an emissions control efficiency for PM10 under worst-case wind conditions of 98 percent. g) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials and tarp materials with a fabric cover or other suitable means to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent. h) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of every three hours on the construction site to achieve an emissions reduction control efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent. i) During active demolition and debris removal, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall apply water to disturbed soils at the end of each day to achieve an emission control efficiency for PM10 of 10 percent. j) During scraper unloading and loading, the property owner/developer’s construc- tion contractor shall ensure that actively disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil moisture content of 12 percent by use of a moveable sprinkler system or water truck to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 69 percent. k) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles per hour to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 57 percent. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-30, Mitigation Measure No. 2-2) 2-3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials. These plans shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project site. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-32, Mitigation Measure No. 2-3) 2-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that high-solids or water-based low emissions paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-15 plans and specifications. Additionally, the property owner/developer’s shall specify the use of high-volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand application. Air-atomized spray techniques shall not be permitted. Plans shall also show that property owner/developers shall construct/build with materials that do not require painting, or use prepainted construction materials, to the extent feasible. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-32, Mitigation Measure No. 2-4) 2-5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10 emissions:  Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis Update, LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012 Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 20+10 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall be implemented as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.  The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site frontage routes as needed. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-5) 2-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/architect shall submit energy calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that shows each new structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall show the following: a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building materials and suppliers can be found at the following website: http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or other similar websites. b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways not within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool pavement materials are available at: http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/ images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html or other similar websites. c) Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or double- paned windows. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-16 d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing over 50,000 square-feet. e) Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the building structure to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and office buildings. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-6) 3.4 Biological Resources SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to biological resources were identified through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to biological resources. The project area is developed with urban uses and is nearly built- out with no natural resources on-site. Based on the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element, no locally designated species or natural communities, wetland habitats, or wildlife corridors are known to exist within the Platinum Triangle. The project area is not part of the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and did not impact any resources within the NCCP area. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY The project site is located in an existing commercial and industrial area and is currently developed with urban uses including a tilt-up light industrial building, associated paved parking and limited landscaping. The site is graded, flat and landscaping consists of non-native ornamental vegetation. The project site does not contain any of the following:  Habitat that would support sensitive species;  Riparian habitat;  Sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife;  Known wetlands;  Native resident or migratory fish, wildlife species, or wildlife corridors;  Protected biological resources; or  Native plant communities or wildlife habitat. Therefore, implementation of the project will not cause any significant impacts related to biological resources, and no mitigation measures will be required. Therefore, no new impacts are anticipated which were not previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-17 Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant biological resources impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. 3.5 Cultural Resources SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to cultural resources were identified through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to cultural resources. Based on the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is not located within the Anaheim Colony Historic District. As such, none of the structures in the project area are identified on the Qualified Historic Structures List of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (July 20, 1999) and no impacts would result from project implementation. There were no known archaeological or paleontological resources, unique geologic features, or human remains at the project site, and no significant impacts to such resources were anticipated according to FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-18 IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY According to FSEIR No. 339, no cultural resources are known to exist on the proposed Platinum Gateway Project site. However, the project includes a General Plan Amendment, so the City of Anaheim initiated formal tribal consultation under the requirements of Senate Bill 18 and sent letters to all applicable Native American tribes as determined by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Chairman Andrew Teutimez Salas of the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians/Kizh Tribe Los Angeles Basin responded via email on August 8, 2012. He states that the proposed project is located within some of their Native Prehistoric KIZH/Gabrieleno Villages, and the tribe requests that one of their Native American Monitors be present only during any and all ground disturbance in an effort to protect and preserve all of their cultural resources in the event that a cultural resource(s) is found. The owner/developer will comply with the Chairman’s request for their Native American Monitor to be present during any and all ground disturbances. The 90-day invitation to consult period ended with no other entities requesting to meet. The City has completed its obligations under Senate Bill 18 for the Platinum Gateway Project. In addition, the project site was previously graded and is currently developed with urban uses including a tilt-up light industrial building, associated paved parking and limited landscaping. The existing structure on the site was built in the 1970’s. The existing structure is not over 50 years old and is not considered historically significant. Therefore, no significant impacts to cultural resources are anticipated and no mitigation measures will be required. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-19 No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant cultural resources impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. 3.6 Geology and Soils SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, impacts related to geology and soils were identified as less than significant through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to geology and soils. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY The following section is summarized from information provided in the Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation for the project site prepared by EEI on July 3, 2012. The Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation is provided in Appendix A of this Initial Study/Addendum. Topography The project site is approximately 145 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and is relatively flat. The site is located in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7½-minute Anaheim quadrangle, which shows that the topography of the surrounding area is also relatively flat. Regional topography gently slopes toward the west and south. Geology Regional Geologic Setting The project site is situated within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province in Southern California. The Peninsular Ranges consist of a series of mountain ranges separated by longitudinal valleys. The ranges trend northwest-southeast and are sub-parallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault. The Peninsular Ranges are bounded by the Transverse Ranges province to the north, the Colorado Desert Province to the east and Mexico to the south. The nearest mountains are the northwest-trending Santa Ana Mountains, located approximately eight miles east of the project site. Local Geologic Setting The project site is underlain by Pleistocene-aged to Holocene-aged alluvial fan deposits. These deposits are locally mantled by artificial fill materials of varying thicknesses. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-20 Alluvium Subsurface conditions consist of Quaternary-age alluvial fan deposits (alluvium) that extends to the maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. The alluvial fan deposits consist of interbedded poorly graded sands and silty sands, with lesser zones of sandy silts and clayey silts. The sandy layers of the alluvium are typically dry to moist and loose to medium dense, while the sandy silt and clayey silt layers are generally moist to very moist and firm to stiff. Laboratory Expansion Index tests indicate that the alluvium has a very low expansion potential. Laboratory tests also indicate that the alluvium is moderately alkaline (pH = 8.2) and is highly corrosive to ferrous metals. Laboratory testing yielded a soluble sulfate concentration of 0.003 percent, indicating a negligible corrosion potential to concrete. Chloride concentration within the tested sample was 0.002 percent, indicating that the alluvium possesses a low potential for corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. A conventional shallow foundation system appears to be suitable for use to support the residential structure proposed for development, and a reinforced mat foundation system for the support of the proposed parking structure, provided the property is graded and improved in general conformance with recommendations presented in the Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by EEI, as well as the California Building Code, the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange grading ordinances. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings to the maximum depths explored of 51.5 feet below existing grades during the subsurface exploration. The historic high groundwater in the vicinity of the site is at least 50 feet below the ground surface. A few groundwater monitoring wells are located within the general vicinity of the project site based on historical well data provided by the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR). The nearest well, No. 04S10W26C001S is located approximately 0.23 miles west of the site and depth to groundwater was approximately 124 feet below ground surface (bgs) in 1973. Well No. 04S10W23R001S, located approximately 0.34 miles northeast of the project site reported a depth to groundwater at 89.8 feet bgs in 1969, and Well No. 04S10W25D001S located approximately 0.50 miles east of the project site reported a depth to groundwater at 113 feet bgs in 2010. In addition, the former Unocal Station located 100 feet south of the project site at 1818 South Lewis Street reported depth to groundwater at approximately 80 to 100 feet bgs. Based on the surface topography, regional groundwater flow can be expected to migrate to the west/southwest. Geologic Hazards Seismic Ground Shaking The portion of Southern California that includes the project site is considered to be seismically active. The nearest active faults that could affect the subject site include the San Joaquin Hills Fault, located approximately 8 miles from the site, the Puente Hills Blind Thrust, located approximately 9 miles from the site, the Whittier Fault, located approximately 9 miles from the site, and the Los Angeles Basin segment of the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone, located ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-21 approximately 10 miles from the site. Other nearby seismic sources includes the Chino-Central Avenue segment of the Elsinore Fault Zone and the offshore segment of the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone. Due to the proximity of the site area to several nearby active faults, strong ground shaking could occur at the site as a result of an earthquake on any one of these faults. The following Table 3.6-1 provides a summary of active fault zones within an approximately 25-mile radius of the project site that may have a considerable effect on the project site in the event significant activity is experienced. There are no known active faults crossing the project site and the site is not within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, the likelihood of surface fault rupture at the project site is low. As a result, seismic ground shaking and surface fault rupture impacts are considered less than significant. Table 3.6-1 Summary of Major Active Faults Fault Name Approximate Distance from Site (Mi.) Maximum Moment Magnitude San Joaquin Hills 7.7 6.6 Puente Hills Blind Thrust 8.5 7.1 Whittier 8.9 6.8 Newport-Inglewood (L.A. Basin) 10.4 7.1 Chino-Central Avenue (Elsinore) 11.9 6.7 Newport-Inglewood (Offshore) 14.8 7.1 Elsinore (Glen Ivy) 15.2 6.8 San Jose 16.3 6.4 Palos Verdes 20.1 7.3 Upper Elysian Park Blind Thrust 21.7 6.4 Sierra Madre 23.1 7.2 Cucamonga 24.2 6.9 Raymond 24.9 6.5 Source: EEI, July 2012. Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture Based on the geography, topography and site-specific geotechnical conditions, the potential for ground lurching or shallow ground rupture at the project site is low; however, due to the active seismicity of California, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. In light of this, the unlikely hazard of lurching or ground-rupture should not preclude consideration of “flexible” design for onsite utility lines and connections. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-22 Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced by earthquake shaking or other rapid loading. Liquefaction and related phenomena have been responsible for substantial structural damage in historical earthquakes, and are a design concern under certain conditions. Liquefaction occurs in saturated soils; soils in which the space between individual particles is completely filled with water. This pore water exerts a pressure on the soil particles that influences how the particles themselves are pressed together. Prior to an earthquake, pore water pressure is typically low; however, earthquake motion can cause the pore water pressure to increase to the point where the soil particles can readily move with respect to each other. When liquefaction occurs, the strength of the soil decreases and the ability of a soil deposit to support structural loads are reduced. The City of Anaheim General Plan Safety Element does not identify any areas of potential liquefaction within or in proximity to the project site. The project area is relatively flat and no near surface static ground water exists at the site. In addition, soils comprising of the Quaternary-aged Alluvium underlies the site. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. Seismically Induced Settlement Seismically induced settlement can occur due to reorientation of soil particles during strong shaking of unsaturated sands, as well as in response to liquefaction of saturated loose granular soils. The total seismically induced settlement is estimated to be less than 1 inch. Differential earthquake induced settlements are estimated to be less than 0.5 inch across a 50-foot span. These measurements are not considered to be significant amounts of seismically induced settlement. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-23 No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant geology and soils effects identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. 3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FSEIR No. 339 evaluated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with build-out of the PTMLUP based on the Technical Advisory for addressing climate change through CEQA released in 2008 by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the amended CEQA Guidelines (released on December 30, 2009). Operational emissions were calculated for area sources (including project-related water demand, energy use, and waste disposal) and transportation sources. An estimate of construction emissions was also generated. Build-out of the PTMLUP would generate substantial greenhouse gas emissions and cumulatively contribute to climate change impacts in California. Implementation of mitigation measures related to solid waste reduction, transportation and motor vehicles, energy efficiency, and water conservation and efficiency would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, however, the emission levels would continue to represent a Significant and Unavoidable Adverse Impact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by City Council. Despite this finding, build-out of the PTMLUP would be consistent with statewide and regional greenhouse gas reduction strategies to integrate land uses and improve transportation planning. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY The proposed Platinum Gateway Project involves an overall increase in the number of residential units (79 units) within the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable square footage for non-residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial) over what was previously analyzed. Operational GHG emissions include the direct emissions from vehicle trips and natural gas use and the indirect emissions resulting from the off-site generation of electricity used on-site and used to obtain, transport, and treat water used on-site. As shown in Section 3.16 Transportation/Traffic of this addendum, the average daily trips associated with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project is approximately 72 percent less than the trips associated with the land uses analyzed by FSEIR No. 339 for the project site. Similarly, the proposed project will reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled by 45,481 VMT. Therefore, GHG emissions from vehicle trips would be reduced by approximately 72 percent. In addition, it is determined in Section 3.17, Utilities and Service Systems of this addendum that the proposed project will generate less demand for utilities including natural gas, electricity, and water. This decrease in both vehicular trips and demand for utilities would result in a reduction in GHG emissions related to the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed Platinum Gateway ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-24 Project will not increase GHG emissions levels beyond what was analyzed in FSEIR No. 339, and no new long-term GHG emissions impacts would occur. The proposed Platinum Gateway Project is a high-density residential infill development that will provide housing opportunities in close proximity to retail, service, entertainment and office opportunities in a pedestrian-friendly environment; reducing vehicular trip and number of vehicular trips. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) provides several bus routes along the project site which connect users to the Anaheim Metrolink Station and the future Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), further reducing the number of vehicular trips. In addition, the project as designed is in compliance with Title 24 of the State Building Code to reduce energy consumption and will meet building efficiency requirements per the relevant mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No. 339. Therefore, similar to FSEIR No. 339, the proposed project is consistent with statewide and regional greenhouse gas reduction strategies. The proposed project does not result in a new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. Therefore, approval of the proposed project would not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to greenhouse gas emissions. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant greenhouse gas emissions impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-25 Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24 California Code of Regulations). Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20 California Code of Regulations). Motor Vehicle Standards (AB 1493). AB 32: California Global Warming Solutions Act. Executive Order S-3-05: Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets. Executive Order S-01-07: Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program. City of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 10.18, Water Conservation Ordinance No. 6138 (adopted April 14, 2009). Assembly Bill 939 (Sher, Chapter 1095, Statutes of 1989). Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339 The following mitigation measures related to GHG were previously adopted in connection to FSEIR No. 339 and are stated throughout this document as applicable to the proposed project. These mitigation measures would reduce vehicle GHG emissions or GHG emissions associated with energy use. Solid Waste Measures 2-3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials. These plans shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project site. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-32, Mitigation Measure No. 2-3) 10-18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-26 of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at its discretion, the following plan components:  Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities.  Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.  Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.  Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection.  Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible.  Prohibiting curbside pick-up.  Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and city regulations. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-42, Mitigation Measure No. 10-18) 10-19 Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer:  Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.  Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.  Collection of office paper for recycling.  Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-19) 10-20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-20) Transportation and Motor Vehicle Measures 2-5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-27 owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10 emissions:  Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis Update, LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012 Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 20+10 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall be implemented as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.  The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site frontage routes as needed. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-5) 9-14 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-115, Mitigation Measure No. 9-14) Energy Efficiency 2-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/architect shall submit energy calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that shows each new structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall show the following: a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building materials and suppliers can be found at the following website: http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or other similar websites. b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways not within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool pavement materials are available at: http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/ images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html or other similar websites. c) Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or double- paned windows. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-28 d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing over 50,000 square-feet. e) Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the building structure to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and office buildings. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-6) 10-22 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance with Title 24, which may include the following:  High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.  Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.  Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.  Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.  Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.  Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors compressor motors, air- handling units, and fan-coil units).  Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.  Use of compact fluorescent lamps.  Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.  Use of ® exit lighting or exit signage.  Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified.  Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high- pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots.  Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods.  Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems. o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per kWh saved for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency that exceed Title 24 requirements.. o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.  Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush [gpf] or less).  Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).  Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.  Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-44, Mitigation Measure No. 10-22) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-29 Water Conservation and Efficiency 10-7 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:  Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible;  Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash down of exterior areas;  Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals;  Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;  Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors;  Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;  Low-flow shower heads in hotels;  Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;  Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are lowest;  Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using appliances;  Cooling tower recirculating system;  Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;  Use of waterway recirculation systems;  Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation; and  Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available. In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-7) 10-9 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet. (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures) (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-40, Mitigation Measure No. 10-9) 10-12 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-12) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-30 10-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient appliances. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-13) 10-14 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines and use recycled water when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-14) 3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials were identified as less than significant through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to hazards and hazardous materials. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY The following section is summarized from information provided in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the project site prepared by EEI on February 7, 2012. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is provided in Appendix B of this Initial Study/Addendum. Records Search Based on historical records such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, and City directories and building records, the project site was developed with orchards and a rural residence from at least 1938. The property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the orchards were cleared. In 1970, a building was constructed and originally occupied by Whirlpool Corporation. Additions to the structure were reportedly made in 1978 and 1989. The building has been occupied by various commercial/industrial tenants since that time. The Orange County Health Care Agency, California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the State Water Resources Control Board were contacted, and other State and Federal databases were reviewed to determine if the project site, or any adjacent properties, were listed as hazardous waste generators, underground storage tank releases (UST), or as having other environmental concerns spill, leak, or aboveground tank). Neither the project site nor any immediately adjacent properties were listed on any of the databases researched. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-31 Four nearby sites were identified as closed LUST cases, where the soil only was impacted. The sites include: Texaco Service Station located 100 feet southwest at the southwest corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street at 818 East Katella Avenue, Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal located 100 feet south at the southeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street at 1818 South Lewis Street, Jaycox Disposal located 100 feet south across Katella Avenue at 1016 East Katella Avenue, and Westrux International Trucks located 100 feet south across Katella Avenue at 1110 East Katella Avenue. Based on regulatory oversight, and “case closed” status of the releases, these sites are not considered to be an environmental concern at this time. Asbestos-Containing Materials According to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, buildings constructed prior to 1980 are considered to have “Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials (PACM) unless otherwise sampled and analyzed. Based on the approximate age of the existing building (early 1970’s) the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) is likely. Building materials will be carefully assessed prior to demolition in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1403. Therefore no impacts are anticipated. Lead-Based Paint Lead has long been recognized as a harmful environmental pollutant and old lead based paint (LBP) is a significant source of lead exposure in the U.S. today. Most structures built before 1960 contain heavily leaded paint. Some buildings built as recently as 1978 may also contain lead paint. Based on the approximate age of the structure (early 1970’s), the presence of lead based paint is likely. These materials will be handled in accordance with all relevant local, State, and Federal regulations and no significant impacts are anticipated. Radon Radon is a radioactive gas which has been identified as a human carcinogen. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends that homeowners in areas with radon screening levels greater than 4 Picocurries per liter (pCi/L) conduct mitigation of radon gas to reduce exposure. The EPA’s Map of Radon Zones (EPA-402-R-93-071) was reviewed for radon levels based on such factors as indoor radon measurements, geology, aerial radioactivity, and soil permeability. The EPA has identified Orange County as Zone 3, having a predicted average indoor radon screening level less than 2 pCi/L, which is considered a low to nominal risk to the property. Therefore, radon is not considered a significant environmental concern at this time. Biphenyls The disposal of Biphenyls (PCB’s) is regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA, 1976), which banned the manufacture and distribution of PCB’s. The EPA, under TSCA guidance, regulates the removal and disposal of all sources of PCB’s containing 50 ppm or more. Any electrical equipment containing dielectric insulating fluids or coolants, ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-32 manufactured prior to 1976, should be considered as potentially PCB-containing. This includes transformers, capacitors, and fluorescent light fittings. In addition, PCB’s may also be found as a stabilizer in older lubricating oils, pesticide extenders, cutting oils, hydraulic fluids, paints, sealants, and flame retardants (UNEP, 1999). Also, due to the age of the structure (pre-1978) on the project site, the structure may contain older fluorescent lighting mounts and/or interior electrical transformers. Older lighting fixtures and/or electrical transformers may contain small amounts of PCBs. These materials will be handled in accordance with all relevant local, State, and Federal regulations and no significant impacts are anticipated. Site Reconnaissance During a site reconnaissance of the project area, small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning products and propane/electric batteries were observed in the New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products suites. Small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste were observed in the Golden West Medical suite. The quantities of these stored chemicals are considered de minimus and not an environmental concern. No other evidence of environmental concern was noted on the project site. Future Construction Construction activities pursuant to implementation of the proposed project will involve the use of chemical agents, solvents, paints, and other hazardous materials. Future contractors will be required to implement standard best management practices (BMPs) and good housekeeping practices in accordance with the City's Municipal Code to control hazardous materials in use during demolition and construction. During construction, no significant impact is expected from the routine use and disposal of these materials. Future Operation Future residential uses will not create or allow any new threat of site contamination involving the production, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials, beyond that which was contemplated in FSEIR No. 339. Because of the limited amount of on-going use of household cleaning agents, there is no significant risk of contamination. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-33 No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant hazards and hazardous materials effects identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions Federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, Part 1926. Hazardous Materials Release Notification – California Health and Safety Codes 25270.7, 25270.8, and 25507. Proposition 65 – Notification Requirements for Presence of Hazardous Materials in Workplace - Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Article 1, 12102 et seq. Lead Containment – California Health & Safety Code sections 17920.10 and 105255. Asbestos and Building Demolition – SCAQMD Rule 1403. PCB Disposal – 40 Code of Federal Regulations part 761. 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Hydrology According to FSEIR No. 339, the portion of the Platinum Triangle east of State College Boulevard is located within the Santa Ana River Watershed and the portion of the Platinum Triangle west of State College Boulevard is located within the Westminster Watershed. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project site is located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance study area within the Zones A99 and X designations. Additionally, the Platinum Triangle is located within the Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-34 Groundwater Basin. Although FSEIR No. 339 identified that implementation of the Platinum Triangle would increase the demand on groundwater supplies, it was determined that adequate water supplies would be available without lowering the local groundwater table level. Water Quality FSEIR No. 339 incorporated the water quality analysis prepared and included in FSEIR No. 332 for the Platinum Triangle. As discussed, pollutant concentrations for the project condition were anticipated to decrease both with and without the best management practices (BMPs) as a result of changes in land use, which in general would result in less light industrial/commercial and more mixed uses. With implementation of mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No. 332, anticipated pollutant concentrations were expected to further decrease and the project water quality impacts would be less than significant; water quality conditions were expected to be better than the existing conditions at the time of the report. FSEIR No. 339 found that no significant unavoidable adverse effects were anticipated from the implementation of the Platinum Triangle. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY A Preliminary Hydrology Report and Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) were prepared by Hall & Foreman, Inc. for the project site in September 2012. The Preliminary Hydrology Report and Preliminary WQMP can be found in Appendices C and D, respectively. Existing Hydrologic Conditions The Platinum Gateway Project site is located within Flood Zone X (Other Flood Areas) as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 0142J (142 of 539), Map Number 06059C0142J. Soil classification is type soils. The soil classification boundary limit is based on Plate from the Orange County Hydrology Manual. The site naturally drains from the northeast to the southwest end of the site. The site is considered flat with a maximum elevation drop of approximately 3 feet over a distance of approximately 850 feet. The project site is predominantly covered by impervious surfaces, with isolated landscape and pervious surfaces along the frontage to South Lewis Street and East Katella Avenue. The rear of the property consists of an unpaved access/loading area for the existing building. As shown on Exhibit 3.9-1 Existing Hydrology Map, drainage discharges to public storm drains and/or roadway facilities located at the following locations: Drainage from the easternmost part of the site is collected in a concrete cross gutter and drains south before discharging into Katella Avenue via the existing easternmost driveway; Drainage from the westernmost part of the site is collected in an above ground concrete gutter and is directed to an inlet at the southwest corner of the property. This inlet is then connected by an underground storm drain line to an existing catch basin located at the northeast corner of the Katella Avenue and Lewis Street intersection; and Located at the northwestern corner of the property is an existing headwall/inlet which collects water received from the rear of the existing building. Drainage ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 3.9-1 EXISTING HYDROLOGY MAP 0 45’ 90’ Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P Source: Hall & Foreman, Inc. PLATINUM VISTA - NOT A PART (NOT A PART) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-36 from this inlet enters a below ground storm drain system that joins the existing storm drain within Lewis Street. The tributary to this system includes a small portion (0.18 acres) of tributary area from the neighboring property to the north. In addition, an existing concrete channel collects water from the property located northeast of the project. The tributary area to this concrete channel is approximately 5.4 acres. This off-site drainage is received on-site at the northeast corner of the project, and continues west along the northerly property line before being collected by the aforementioned headwall/inlet. Proposed Hydrologic Conditions Topography under developed conditions would be very flat throughout the site. As shown on Exhibit 3.9-2 Proposed Hydrology Map, a series of “bird-baths” or sump areas would generally be located within the interior courtyard areas of the residential building to allow minimum grades while maintaining uniform elevation for the building. These sump areas would be drained by catch basins/inlets and connected through a network of below ground storm drain lines. Emergency overflow provisions for the interior courtyards would include scupper and/or channel drains extending through the multiple utility corridors of each respective courtyard. The proposed storm drain system would closely mimic that of the existing condition and would discharge at the same three locations. The existing storm drain infrastructure would connect to a 78-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) within Lewis Street and a 54-inch RCP within Katella Avenue. From there, storm flows continue to the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel before ultimately reaching Anaheim Bay/Huntington Harbor and the Pacific Ocean. The existing connecting storm drain systems within Katella Avenue and Lewis Street are currently under capacity. Therefore, peak flows resulting from the project will not exceed the peak flows under the existing condition. Due to the City of Anaheim’s planned widening of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street, the project site will lose acreage along the frontage of these two roadways. This will be offset by acreage gained at the northern property line where the Connector Street will encroach onto the neighboring property to the north. The net loss of tributary drainage area for the proposed project is 0.19 acres. Approximately 0.69 acres of the project site would be a tributary to a below ground storm drain system running east to west within the Connector Street. This storm drain system would also receive the off-site drainage at the northeast corner of the property before running west within the Connector Street, and would ultimately join the existing 78-inch RCP storm drain line within Lewis Street. Approximately 3.78 acres of the project site would be a tributary to a below ground storm drain system running north to south within the Connector Street. This storm drain system will run south within the Connector Street and ultimately join the existing 54-inch RCP storm drain line within Katella Avenue. It should be noted that this north-south system would ultimately receive the drainage from the adjacent proposed Platinum Vista project. The remaining on-site tributary areas would also be collected in a below ground storm drain system. This system would serve those areas fronting both Katella Avenue and Lewis Street, ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 3.9-2 PROPOSED HYDROLOGY MAP 0 45’ 90’ Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P Source: Hall & Foreman, Inc. PLATINUM VISTA - NOT A PART (NOT A PART) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-38 and represents approximately 4.04 acres of the project site. This system is proposed to join the existing catch basin at the northeast corner of the Katella Avenue and Lewis Street intersection. Due to grade limitations, it is recommended that the invert of the existing storm drain line being connected be lowered a minimum of 2.5 feet as part of the Katella Avenue widening project to allow on-site drainage systems to gravity flow to this point of connection. Due to the introduction of an underground storm drain system in the developed condition, peak flows will experience a minor increase from those of the existing condition. However, underground detention basins located in drainage areas E and G would reduce peak flow. As a result, the proposed project would produce lower total peak flow and total volume compared to the existing condition. The percentage of impervious area and peak storm flows and volumes will be similar to the previously proposed hotel, office, and residential uses and will not create a substantial increase in on- or off-site erosion potential or flooding potential. Therefore, no new significant impacts are anticipated which have not been addressed in FSEIR No. 339. Water Quality Water Quality Standards and Waste Discharge Since the project will disturb one acre or more of soil during construction, it is subject to the requirements of the State General Construction Activity NPDES permit. Permit applicants are required to submit a Notice of Intent to the State Water Resources Control Board, prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) detailed in the to reduce construction effects on receiving water quality by implementing erosion control measures using the best available or best conventional control technology. Typical BMPs include plastic sheeting over soil piles, berms to direct runoff to a designated area, sandbags, silt fencing, screens, and dust control. The proposed project is considered a “priority project” as defined in the City’s Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and therefore shall consider that site design BMPs, routine non-structural and structural source control BMPs, and treatment control BMPs be implemented on-site. Under the municipal Orange County NPDES permit issued by the Santa Ana the City of Anaheim is required to ensure that discharges from its municipal storm drain systems do not cause or contribute to exceedances of receiving water quality standards (designated beneficial uses and water quality objectives) for surface waters or groundwaters. In accordance with Mitigation Measure 3-2 of FSEIR No. 339, a preliminary WQMP has been prepared (see Appendix D) which identifies BMPs that will be used to minimize pollutants in runoff from the site after construction of the project. Anaheim Bay is considered an impaired water body and is listed for dieldrin (tissue), nickel, PCB's biphenyls) (tissue), and sediment toxicity. Huntington Harbor is also considered an impaired water body and is listed for chlordane, copper, lead, nickel, PCB's, pathogens, and sediment toxicity. No Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL’s) for Anaheim Bay and Huntington Harbor have been developed. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-39 The project will be constructed within an existing developed area, and no additional sources of polluted runoff are anticipated. The WQMP prepared for the project identifies BMPs required to reduce impacts to water quality and to ensure that no additional impairments of the Anaheim Bay and Huntington Harbor occur as a result of the project. Therefore, implementation of the WQMP will reduce impacts to water quality to less than significant levels. Groundwater According to the preliminary geotechnical evaluation prepared for the project, the depth to groundwater was measured between 80 to 124 feet below ground surface (bgs) at various locations near the project site. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings to the maximum depths explored of 51.5 feet below existing grades during the subsurface exploration. Groundwater is sufficiently deep that it is not anticipated to adversely impact the proposed development. The project site is not located in a groundwater recharge area. The site will not utilize groundwater for operation; water will be supplied by the local municipal water service. Therefore, no impacts related to groundwater supplies or recharge will result from the proposed project. Flood Hazard and Dam/Levee Failure The project site is located within a 100-Year to 500-Year Flood Zone as identified in the City's Safety Element of the General Plan (Figure S-6). However, in the event that a flood should occur, it is expected to be less than one foot deep. Also, the site is located outside of flood hazard and floodway areas as defined on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) (FIRM Map for Orange County and Incorporated Areas, Community Panel 060213, and Panel Map No. 06059C0142J, 2009). Figure 5.5-5 of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update EIR No. 330 identifies that the proposed project site is located within the flood impact zone associated with the Prado Dam, which is located over 15 miles northeast of the proposed project site. Although the proposed project site is located within the designated flood impact zone, the actual threat of flooding is low due to the extensive development and natural features that exist between the dam and the proposed project site, including several freeways, the Santa Ana River, and portions of the Santa Ana mountain range which would act to block, reduce, or slow the risk of flooding. Additionally, the Prado Dam is subject to annual safety inspections to ensure that the dam is safe, performing as intended, and not developing problems (DWR 2010). Therefore, impacts associated with the risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding would be less than significant. Inundation by Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow The project site is not within a dam/levee inundation area, a tsunami hazard area, a seiche inundation area, or subject to mudflows as designated in the City’s Safety Element of the General Plan (Figure S-3). ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-40 Conclusion The proposed project will meet all City drainage and flood control requirements and will obtain an NPDES permit. Off-site storm drains are adequately sized for the proposed project. The proposed project is expected to have similar impacts related to hydrology and water quality as was analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. Therefore, the proposed project would not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to surface hydrology, water quality, and groundwater. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant hydrology and water quality impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions Future projects shall comply with the Storm Drain Impact and Improvement Fee in the Anaheim Municipal Code. The Fee is designed to implement the goals in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area, the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, the City of Anaheim General Plan, and the Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drain Financial Implementation Plan for the South Central City Area, mitigating flooding and storm drainage impacts. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-41 3.10 Land Use and Planning SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Consistency with General Plan Policies FSEIR No. 339 analyzed the impacts of amending the General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate approximately 191 acres from the Office High land use designation to the Mixed- Use designation; redesignate approximately 17 acres from the Institutional land use designation to the Mixed-Use designation; and reflect a recently constructed park and parks required by approved development agreements. The General Plan Land Use Element was also amended to increase the permitted development intensities in the Platinum Triangle, and remove the FAR requirement for Mixed-Uses and Office Uses in the Platinum Triangle. The total intensity evaluated in FSEIR No. 339 for Mixed-Use was 18,909 dwelling units, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, 9,862,166 square feet of office, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional; 4,478,356 square feet of office-high and office-low uses, institutional development at a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.50, and open space at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10. In addition, the Circulation Element was amended to modify street designations and add Class II bikeways within the Platinum Triangle. Southern California Gas Company’s Existing Microwave Tower The Southern California Gas Company (SCG) operates a microwave tower that serves a core function in the Sempra Utilities data and voice network and provides critical communication links to the transmission facility, which plays a key role in transmitting natural gas to Orange, Riverside, Imperial, and San Diego counties. The microwave tower also serves as the SCG’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) for the Orange County area. According to SCG, introduction of high-rise buildings in the line-of-sight of the microwave tower and prohibition on rooftop telecommunications towers without any shielding or covers would interfere with the proper telecommunications function of the microwave tower both at the local level and throughout southern California. Potential land use conflicts would be from the individual projects north of the microwave tower that may obstruct the tower’s line-of-sight. As of the date of FSEIR No. 339 certification, these projects included Stadium Lofts (completed in January 2007); Stadium Park Apartments (approved/not under construction); Park Viridian (completed); Stadium Club Condos (approved/not under construction); Platinum Vista (approved/not under construction); Platinum Gateway (approved/not under construction); and Dwell @ Katella (92 units under construction). However, most developments north of the tower were approved for podium style structures that would not exceed five stories and would not interfere with the telecommunication function. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be inconsistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Public Services and Facilities Element related to the operation of a Southern California Gas Company microwave tower, resulting in a Significant and Unavoidable Adverse Impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council related to this land use impact. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-42 Consistency with Zoning Designations for the Project Area According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project required a zoning reclassification to add properties to the PTMU Overlay Zone to create new ARTIC and Office Districts and expand the Katella and Orangewood Districts. Consequently, Chapter 18.20, PTMU Overlay Zone of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code was amended to: 1) reflect the boundary changes; 2) provide development standards for ARTIC, Stadium, Arena, and Office Districts; and 3) modify zoning standards, including, but not limited to, vacant lots and setbacks and parking structure requirements for hotels and offices. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that the proposed reclassification and Zoning Code Amendment would not degrade the integrity of or conflict with the PTMU Overlay Zone objectives. Consistency with the Adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan As analyzed in FSEIR No. 339, implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project required the following amendments to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP): reflect the proposed General Plan amendments; adjust the boundaries of the PTMU Overlay Zone to create the ARTIC and Office Districts and expand the Katella and Orangewood Districts; distribute the proposed increased development intensities; replace Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A with Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C; and reflect technical refinements and clarifications including, but not limited to, refinements to street cross-sections, density descriptions and exhibits. The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) includes the following planning principles: • Balance and integrate uses • Stimulate market-driven development • Create a unique, integrated, walkable urban environment • Reinforce transit oriented development opportunities • Maintain and enhance connectivity • Create great neighborhoods FSEIR No. 339 found that expansion of the PTMLUP would not degrade the integrity of or conflict with the PTMLUP’s planning principles. In addition, the creation of the ARTIC District would reinforce transit-oriented development opportunities, and adjustment of mixed-use boundaries would enhance connectivity and create dynamic neighborhoods. Consistency with the Compass Blueprint 2% Strategy and Regional Transportation Plan In 2004, SCAG adopted the Compass Blueprint, which is a part of the 2004 regional growth forecast policy that attempts to reduce emissions and increase mobility through strategic land use changes. Goals for areas identified in the Compass Blueprint include locating new housing near existing jobs and new jobs near existing housing, encouraging in-fill development, promoting development with a mix of uses, creating walkable communities, providing a mix of housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-43 types, and focusing development in urban areas. A portion of the Platinum Triangle has been designated by SCAG as a strategic area in which to focus growth. This area contains the future ARTIC that will be served by Amtrak, Metrolink commuter rail, and Orange County Transportation Authority bus services. The Platinum Triangle is consistent with the overall Compass Blueprint in that it directs additional housing and mixed-use opportunities near to existing and future jobs in the Orange County subregion and locates new jobs near to transit. The 2008 Regional Transportation Plan’s (RTP’s) goals and policies link the goal of sustaining mobility with the goals of fostering economic development, enhancing the environment, reducing energy consumption, promoting transportation-friendly development patterns, and encouraging fair and equitable access to residents affected by socio-economic, geographic, and commercial limitations. FSEIR No. 339 determined that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY General Plan Consistency A General Plan Amendment is being proposed to increase the allowable number of residential units in the Platinum Triangle area by 79 units, and decrease the allowable office and commercial uses by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet, respectively. The property is designated “Mixed-Use,” which allows for the development of residential uses as identified in the Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan. The increase in the allowable Platinum Triangle area residential dwelling units will assist the City in ensuring adequate housing availability. The General Plan Amendment is only being proposed in order to change the intensity of the uses, by increasing residential and reducing office and commercial uses. Therefore, no significant impacts are associated with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project. The proposed increase in the maximum number of residential units and decrease in the maximum office and commercial square footage in the Platinum Triangle area will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the community. The introduction of the residential use into the PTMU Overlay Zone area will reduce overall peak hour trips and will benefit the public by dispersing traffic to alternate hours. Additionally, the project site will be compatible with the Platinum Vista, a future residential complex that is currently being processed for the development of 350 dwelling units located adjacent to the project site at 1005 – 1105 East Katella Avenue. Just east of the future Platinum Vista residential complex are the existing Vivere condominium complex located at 1331 East Katella Avenue, and the existing Park Viridian apartment homes complex located at 1515 East Katella Avenue. The proposed project will be compatible with these aforementioned residential projects in terms of similar building heights, scale, and density. Compatibility of the proposed project with each of the General Plan Elements is presented below. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-44 Land Use Element The General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as Mixed-Use. The Mixed-Use land use category provides opportunities for an integrated mix of residential, retail, service, entertainment and office opportunities in a pedestrian-friendly environment. Mixed-Use areas encourage the use of transit service and other forms of transportation, including pedestrian and bicycle travel. Residential development in these areas emphasizes quality and offers a variety of amenities. Structured parking is an essential component in most mixed-use developments. The scale, size and mixture of uses in the mixed-use areas vary based upon the character of the surrounding area. The Platinum Gateway Project is located within the Platinum Triangle Mixed- Use Overlay Zone. Since the project is proposing to locate 399 dwelling units directly adjacent to existing and proposed residential projects, and numerous office and light industrial businesses, vehicular dependency will be reduced while pedestrian-friendly walkways will encourage walking and biking to nearby areas. The residential project not only complies with, but also embraces the Mixed-Use land use category by placing residents in close proximity to restaurants, services and entertainment, creating a beneficial mix of uses for both residents and businesses. Circulation Element The project site is located at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street. A traffic impact analysis update has been prepared in order to adequately and accurately determine the overall traffic impacts of the proposed project (See Appendix Due to the fact that the project will generate less traffic than the currently entitled land uses, the elimination of office and commercial square footage and the construction of the 399 dwelling units will reduce traffic impacts compared to what was previously analyzed for this project site. According to the traffic impact analysis update, the proposed project would significantly impact the intersection of South Lewis Street and East Katella Avenue based on the City’s performance criteria. However, Katella Avenue is planned to be widened in 2013, before completion of the proposed project which will mitigate project impacts to less than significant. The widening of Katella Avenue is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and is funded by the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District (CFD). The proposed residential development is located off of Katella Avenue offering a number of OCTA bus routes. The bus system provides access to nearby employment and commercial areas, the Anaheim Metrolink Station which is located approximately 1 mile east at 2150 East Katella Avenue, as well as a connection to other areas within and outside of the City. Bus routes offering transit service within the project vicinity include the following: 1. Route 43: Fullerton – Costa Mesa 2. Route 46: Los Alamitos – Orange 3. Route 47: Fullerton – Newport Beach 4. Route 50: Long Beach – Orange 5. Route 54: Garden Grove – Orange 6. Route 57: Brea – Newport Beach 7. Route 59: Anaheim – Irvine ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-45 8. Route 83: Anaheim – Laguna Hills 9. Route 430: Anaheim Metrolink/Amtrak Station – Anaheim Resort Area 10. Route 757: Pomona – Santa Ana Express Green Element The objectives of the Green Element are to: “Expand public parks and open space amenities; improve the City’s trail and bicycle network for local and regional connections; beautify arterial corridors with landscape plans, edge treatments and gateways; and use existing opportunities, such as easements, vacant land and the Santa Ana River to expand accessible open space and recreation opportunities.” Although the project site is located within a highly urbanized area, several of the Green Element’s objectives will be satisfied through the design of the proposed project. More specifically, the proposed project will provide several recreational amenities and leisure areas throughout the project including a 17,570 square foot public park, and 88,610 square feet of recreation-leisure areas comprising of six landscaped courtyards, an entry courtyard, a club house and fitness center, and landscaped areas along East Katella Avenue, South Lewis Street and the Connector Street. The project will also be responsible for payment of community park fees consistent with the most recent City Council adopted fee resolution. The Green Element also includes goals for conserving natural resources. The project is designed with water-conserving plumbing fixtures and water efficient irrigation to conserve water resources. Additionally, the project as designed is in compliance with Title 24 of the State Building Code. This Title requires certain features be incorporated into the design of the project in order to reduce energy consumption. With Title 24 compliance, the project is meeting the goal by conserving energy. Due to the location of the proposed project, biological and mineral resources will not be affected. Public Services and Facilities Element The Public Services and Facilities Element anticipated and required by this General Plan Element include fire protection and emergency services, police services, electric, water and private utilities, sanitary sewer and storm drain systems, solid waste disposal, schools, libraries, and community centers and cultural facilities. All of these public facilities are being addressed throughout the processing of the project through the City of Anaheim. For example, the Anaheim Police Department and the Anaheim Fire Department are responsible for reviewing the project plans for compliance with their regulations. Refer to Section 3.14 Public Services of this document for further discussion. Growth Management Element The purpose of the Growth Management Element reads: “To ensure that growth is based on the City’s ability to provide adequate levels of traffic management and other public facilities and services pursuant to the Countywide Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Component of Measure The purpose of this Element is satisfied and addressed through project implementation. Similar to the Circulation Element goal, a traffic impact analysis update has ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-46 been prepared in order to adequately and accurately determine the overall traffic impacts of the proposed project. Due to the fact that the project will generate less traffic than the currently entitled land uses, the elimination of office and commercial square footage and the construction of the 399 dwelling units will reduce traffic impacts compared to what was previously analyzed for this project site. Additionally, Goal 1.1 of the Element looks to provide a balance of housing options and job opportunities throughout the City. The project aids in satisfaction of this Goal by providing residential land uses in close proximity to job centers, thereby potentially reducing the travel time and commute costs for the future residents who would be forced to live farther from their place of work should the project site be developed for office/commercial uses. Safety Element The stated purpose of the Safety Element is to: “Identify potential hazards that can significantly impact the City; provide policies to minimize potential dangers to residents, workers, and visitors, and to reduce the level of property loss due to a potential disaster; and, identify ways to respond to crisis situations.” Implementation of the project will satisfy the goals of this element. The project will be constructed consistent with all applicable building and zoning code statutes. Being that the project is located in a built urban environment, there are no areas of high fire hazard within close proximity. The project site is located within a 100-Year to 500-Year Flood Zone as identified in the City's Safety Element of the General Plan (Figure S-6). Figure 5.5-5 of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update EIR No. 330 identifies that the proposed project site is located within the flood impact zone associated with the Prado Dam, which is located over 15 miles northeast of the proposed project site. However, in the event that a flood should occur, it is expected to be less than one foot deep. As further discussed in Section 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality of this addendum, although the proposed project site is located within the designated flood impact zone, the actual threat of flooding is low due to the extensive development and natural features that exist between the Prado Dam and the proposed project site, including several freeways, the Santa Ana River, and portions of the Santa Ana mountain range which would act to block, reduce, or slow the risk of flooding. Also, the site is located outside of flood hazard and floodway areas as defined on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) (FIRM Map for Orange County and Incorporated Areas, Community Panel 060213, and Panel Map No. 06059C0142J, 2009). Noise Element The goal of the Noise Element is to: “Protect sensitive land uses from excessive noise through diligent planning and regulation.” This goal will be met through the design of the residential project, including the use of architectural acoustic upgrades in the form of Sound Transmission Class (STC)-rated windows and doors in residential units. Compliance with the California Building Code would ensure that interior noise levels meet the required limits. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-47 Economic Development Element The goal of the Economic Development Element reads: “Create a major, mixed-use regional center in the Platinum Triangle providing employment, shopping, entertainment, and housing for residents, employees and visitors.” The proposed project will satisfy this goal by introducing a large-scale residential development which will provide a market for the growing retail and office uses in the Platinum Triangle area. Community Design Element The goal of the Community Design Element reads: “The Platinum Triangle will become a dynamic, mixed-use center of regional interest, providing retail, office, residential, employment, and entertainment opportunities.” This goal is met through the design of the proposed residential project. The proposed project will provide a quality, high-density urban housing development that is integrated into the surrounding area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, convenient transit connections and arterial access. The proposed project will also include a public park to meet the recreational needs of the site’s residents and neighboring uses. Housing Element One of the goals of the Housing Element states: “Expand the community’s supply of housing, including opportunities for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households.” Given this goal, the project site’s 399 dwelling units will help increase the City’s housing supply, improve the City’s jobs-housing balance, and provide new residential opportunities within easy access to a variety of office, commercial, retail, entertainment, and sports facilities. Consistency with the Adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Implementation of the Platinum Gateway Project would require an amendment to the PTMLUP to amend the allotted residential units and office and commercial square footages allocated to the project site and the public park site consistent with the General Plan amendment. The proposed project would not degrade the integrity of or conflict with the plan’s principles. The Platinum Gateway Project satisfies the planning principals by creating a residential development within a mixed-use area which balances and integrates the surrounding uses and reinforces transit- oriented design. Consistency with the Zoning Ordinance Under the Zoning Code, the project site is designated as I (Industrial) Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone. The Platinum Gateway Project will be increasing the overall dwelling unit cap of 18,909 dwelling units within the PTMU by 79 dwelling units to 18,988 units and will decrease the overall office and commercial densities of 9,862,166 square feet and 4,909,682 square feet, respectively, to 9,652,747 square feet and 4,795,111 square feet, respectively. The additional 79 units will alter the Katella District residential development density by increasing the maximum number of dwelling units from 5,707 to 5,786. The project’s ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-48 proposed density increase of 79 units will provide new residential opportunities within easy access to a variety of office, commercial, retail, entertainment, and sports facilities. The increase in allowable dwelling units allows the City to improve its jobs/housing balance. The residential development is complementary to the surrounding existing and future uses and is compatible with the improvements in the vicinity. Locating housing near work opportunities reduces traffic and contributes to the improvement of air quality. As a result, no significant impacts are associated with the proposed Zone Amendment. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant land use impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions The Proposed Project shall be designed in accordance with all relevant development standards and regulations set forth by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code (as amended), including the PTMU Overlay Zone (as amended), the Platinum Triangle MLUP (as amended) and the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement (as amended). ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-49 3.11 Mineral Resources SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to mineral resources were identified through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to mineral resources. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY According to the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element, the proposed project is not located in an area designated as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) or a Regionally Significant Aggregate Resource Area (Resource Sector). In addition, the project site is currently developed and no mineral resources operations exist on the project site. The proposed project would not result in the loss of any mineral resources. Therefore, no impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant mineral resource impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-50 3.12 Noise SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, noise in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area was measured by the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which is an average of all measured noise levels over a 24-hour period based on the “A-weighted decibel” (dBA). Noise standards for various land uses were identified and noise measurements were taken at five locations along local roadways. Major sources of noise in the Platinum Triangle include Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Honda Center, The Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Stadium Metrolink/Amtrak Station, and existing light industrial land uses, distribution facilities, hotels, offices, restaurants, and supporting retail. Additionally, noise from several new residential communities within the Platinum Triangle, vehicular traffic, occasional aircraft overflights, and rail traffic would all contribute to the existing urban noise environment. Traffic Related Noise According to FSEIR No. 339, noise impacts due to project implementation would occur primarily from project-related traffic. The Platinum Triangle would result in new significant noise increases along multiple roadway segments representing a Significant and Unavoidable Adverse Impact as identified in SEIR No. 332. Impacts to noise-sensitive uses sited in close proximity or adjacent to major arterials, freeways, railroads, industrial or entertainment uses, the ARTIC District, or Angel Stadium of Anaheim would experience Significant and Unavoidable Adverse noise impacts, similar to those identified in SEIR No. 332. Adjacent Industrial-Source Noise FSEIR No. 339 found that residences within the Platinum Triangle could be exposed to stationary-source noise from activities conducted at the adjacent industrial areas. Noise from industrial uses could occur during the nighttime hours when residences are most sensitive to extraneous noise sources. Primary noise generators from these types of industrial/commercial uses include truck idling, loading, and unloading activities. Both FSEIR No. 332 and FSEIR No. 339 identified potentially significant impacts for any noise-sensitive uses sited in close proximity or adjacent to industrial uses. On-Site Recreation According to FSEIR No. 339, noise generated at pocket parks within the Platinum Triangle would be primarily from voices. However, all roadways modeled within the Platinum Triangle generate substantially greater noise levels, and use of the recreational areas is typically restricted to daytime hours. Therefore, noise generated by pocket parks would not generate substantial levels of stationary-source noise at existing noise-sensitive receptors. As a result, noise impacts from these sources associated with the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be less than significant. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-51 Interior Noise Pursuant to the California Building Code, noise-sensitive habitable rooms would be required to be designed to achieve an interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Due to the high volumes of traffic and proximity of new noise-sensitive developments adjacent to the major arterials, freeways, and railroads, building facades that are exposed to noise levels that exceed 69 dBA would require architectural acoustic upgrades in the form of Sound Transmission Class (STC)- rated windows and doors in new residential units. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance with the California Building Code would ensure that interior noise levels meet the required limits. Therefore, interior noise levels would be less than significant. Short-Term Construction Related Noise Construction activities related to build-out of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would result in vibration levels exceeding the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s) criteria for vibration-induced structural damage within the Platinum Triangle and would be considered significant and unavoidable. Construction impacts would result in temporary exceedances of the 65 dBA standard up to 446 feet (397 feet for residential construction) from the construction site and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council for these Significant and Unavoidable Adverse noise impacts. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY As in FSEIR No. 339, noise impacts due to project implementation would occur primarily from project-generated traffic and short-term construction noise. Long-Term Traffic Related Noise Traffic noise will be generated from along site major roadways and access roads including East Katella Avenue, South Lewis Street, and the Connector Street. Long-term noise levels would be less than future noise levels analyzed as part of FSEIR No. 339. The proposed Platinum Gateway Project involves an overall increase in the number of residential units (79 units) within the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable square footage for non- residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial) over what was previously analyzed. As shown in Section 3.16 Transportation/Traffic of this addendum, the average daily trips associated with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project is approximately 72 percent less than what was previously analyzed for this project site. This decrease in vehicular trips would decrease noise impacts related to the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project will not increase noise levels beyond what was analyzed in FSEIR No. 339, and no new long-term noise impacts would occur. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-52 Short-Term Construction Related Noise Construction associated with the proposed project would occur in proximity to noise- and vibration-sensitive uses, including the existing four-story Vivere condominium complex located approximately 300 feet east of the project site at 1331 East Katella Avenue, and the existing five- story Park Viridian apartment homes complex located approximately 700 feet east of the project site at 1515 East Katella Avenue. Construction would occur over a 24-month period and would involve standard contractor’s equipment typical for the demolition, site preparation, grading, landscaping, and construction of the parking structure and residential building. Construction activities will cause annoyance to sensitive land uses when construction equipment is operating nearest to the receptors due to noise levels and exposure to substantial levels of groundbourne vibration and groundbourne noise. According to FSEIR No. 339, the 65 dBA CNEL contour would fall at a distance of approximately 397 feet for residential construction; therefore the nearest sensitive receptor, residents of the Vivere condominium complex could experience CNEL levels higher than 65 dBA. According to the City’s Noise Ordinance, noise sources associated with construction are exempt from the City’s Noise Ordinance standards between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. While the City exempts construction noise from the 60 dBA standard at the property line when construction occurs during these hours, construction noise would have the potential to generate noise levels well above the existing ambient noise levels; vibration impacts would also result in a nuisance to sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the construction site, in particular the residences east of the proposed project site. These impacts would represent significant, short-term noise and vibration impacts that would cease after completion of construction. Consistent with FSEIR No. 339, these impacts are considered significant and unavoidable. However, development of the less intense project would shorten the construction time due to the elimination of office and commercial uses; thereby reducing the amount of time in which sensitive receptors would be affected. Additionally, implementation of the existing mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No 339 will further reduce impacts to noise. Thus, no new noise impacts would occur and no new mitigation measures would be required. Anticipated short-term and long-term noise levels are not expected to increase beyond levels that have been considered previously in FSEIR No 339. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-53 No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant noise impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions State of California Interior and Exterior Noise Standards are incorporated into the California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2, California Code of Regulations) and are the noise standards required for new construction in California. Community Noise Standards adopted by the City of Anaheim in the General Plan, Noise Element. City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 6.20, Sound Pressure Levels: Stationary Noise Standards. City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 6.20, Construction Noise. City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.20.160, Compatibility Standards. FTA groundborne vibration and noise impact criteria. Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339 The following mitigation measures are taken directly from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation measures apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project. 5-1 Prior to approval of street improvement plans for any project-related roadway widening, the City shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design project acoustical features that will limit traffic noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are below the City’s noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-54 ordinance. These treatments shall be noted on the street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and may include, but are not limited to, the replacement of windows and doors at existing residences with acoustically rated windows and doors. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-38, Mitigation Measure No. 5-1) 5-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project property owner/developers shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter, stationary sources industrial, commercial, stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior noise standards as follows: a) The report shall demonstrate that the proposed residential design will result in compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise levels, as required by the California Building Code and California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24 and 25 of the California Code of Regulations). b) The report shall demonstrate that the Proposed Project residential design shall minimize nighttime awakening from stadium event noise and train horns such that interior single-event noise levels are below 81 dBA Lmax. The property owner/developer shall submit the noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for review and approval. Upon approval by the City, the project acoustical design features shall be incorporated into construction of the Proposed Project. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-39, Mitigation Measure No. 5-2) 5-4 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that occupancy disclosure notices regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be elevated during sounding of train horns will be provided to all future tenants facing an at-grade crossing of the Orange County Line. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-39, Mitigation Measure No. 5-4) 5-5 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, to reduce noise and vibration impacts from the impact pile driver, the construction contractor shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct cast-in-place piles for a pile- supported transfer slab foundation system. This alternative construction method would reduce the duration necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or eliminate the need to use pile drivers altogether. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted to the Planning Department in the form of a letter from the construction contractor. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-40, Mitigation Measure No. 5-5). 5-7 Ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise: a) Noise generated by construction, shall be limited by the property owner/developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as governed by Chapter 6.70, Sound Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-55 b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment that produces noise levels noticeably above general construction noise levels to the hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM. c) All internal combustion engines on all of the construction equipment shall be properly outfitted with well maintained muffler systems. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-40, Mitigation Measure No. 5-7) 5-8 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring project contractors to properly maintain and tune all construction equipment to minimize noise emissions. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-41, Mitigation Measure No. 5-8) 5-9 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring project contractors to locate all stationary noise sources generators, compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-41, Mitigation Measure No. 5-9) 5-10 Ongoing during construction activities, material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 6.70. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-41, Mitigation Measure No. 5-10) 3.13 Population and Housing SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FSEIR No. 339 concluded that no significant impacts were anticipated regarding housing and employment in the Platinum Triangle upon project implementation. The EIR indicated that the jobs/housing ratio in the City will be 1.77. Adherence to the Housing Element of the City’s General Plan, which is aimed at the provision of adequate housing supplies, would help ensure adequate housing availability within the City and the Platinum Triangle. No mitigation measures were required. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY The proposed project involves an overall increase in the number of residential units (79 units) within the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable square footage for non-residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial) over what was previously analyzed. This represents a 0.4 percent increase in residential units and a 1.7 percent decrease in non-residential square footage (1.5 percent decrease in office square footage and 2.3 percent decrease in commercial square footage) compared to what was planned for in FSEIR No. 339. As shown on the following Table 3.13-1, the proposed change in land use intensities will change the current jobs/housing ratio in the Platinum Triangle from 2.19 to 2.15. This less than significant change to the Platinum Triangle area will have an even smaller impact to the overall jobs/housing ratio for the entire City of Anaheim. Therefore, the proposed ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-56 project will not significantly alter the current projected jobs/housing ratio of 1.77 for the City of Anaheim. Table 3.13-1 Estimated Population, Housing and Employment Generation for the Platinum Triangle Land Use FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Change Revised Platinum Triangle Housing 18,909 DU 28,364 population +79 DU +119 population 18,988 28,482 population Office 14,340,522 SF 41,500 employees -209,419 SF - 648 employees 14,131,103 SF 40,852 employees Commercial 4,909,682 SF -114,571 SF 4,795,111 SF Institutional 1,500,000 SF 1,500,000 SF Jobs/Housing Ratio 2.19 2.15 Note: Based on a population generation rate of 1.5 persons per dwelling unit and an employment generation factor of 500 square feet per employee. Source: FSEIR No. 339 FSEIR No. 339 found that no significant impacts are anticipated regarding housing and employment in the Platinum Triangle upon project implementation. Adherence to the Housing Element of the City’s General Plan, which is aimed at the provision of adequate housing supplies, will help ensure adequate housing availability within the City and the Platinum Triangle. As a result, the Platinum Gateway Project does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to housing and employment. No mitigation measures are required. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-57 information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant population and housing effects identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. 3.14 Public Services SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FSEIR No. 339 analyzed impacts to public services including fire protection, police protection, schools, libraries, and child care services. Fire Protection Services According to FSEIR No. 339, the City of Anaheim Fire Department (AFD) provides fire protection, emergency rescue and medical services to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. There are 11 fire stations located throughout the City plus one station in the Disneyland Resort. No fire stations currently exist within the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area, however, the two nearest fire stations are located approximately one-half mile from the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. Stadium Station #7 is located at 2222 East Ball Road, and Resort Station #3 is located at 1717 South Clementine. AFD has a plan to construct three new fire stations to serve the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. The first station, the Battalion Headquarters Station will be located along Santa Cruz Street north of Orangewood Avenue, the second station will be located in the north central area of the Platinum Triangle, and the third station will be located at an undetermined location. FSEIR No. 339 indicated that due to the additional population, density, and usage generated by the development of the Platinum Triangle, demand for emergency medical services, ambulance transportation, and rescue operations would increase. These increases would result in delayed response times for first engine response, and additional fire facilities were identified as necessary to provide adequate fire protection services. The impact on fire protection services is considered significant. Additional fire facilities and staff needed to serve the Platinum Triangle as a result of the increase in service demands would be funded through payment of the Public Safety Impact Fee as development within the Platinum Triangle progresses. FSEIR No. 339 found that with implementation of mitigation measures, no significant and unavoidable impacts to fire protection services were anticipated. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-58 Police Protection Services According to FSEIR No. 339, law enforcement and crime prevention services are provided by the Anaheim Police Department (APD). The City of Anaheim is divided into four districts and one police heliport. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is located within the South Police District. The two nearest police facilities are Main Station, located 3.5 miles west of the Platinum Triangle at 425 S. Harbor Boulevard, and South Station, located 3.6 miles west of the Platinum Triangle at 1520 Disneyland Drive. As of July 1, 2010, the APD is authorized for 370 sworn officers. According to the APD, the development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would create an increase in service calls, which would create a need for additional officers and support personnel, office space, vehicles and equipment, resulting in a significant impact. However, FSEIR No. 339 found that with implementation of mitigation measures, no significant unavoidable impacts on police protection were expected. School Services FSEIR No. 339 stated that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is located within the boundaries of the Anaheim City School District (ACSD) and the Anaheim Union High School District (AUHSD) and within the attendance boundaries of Paul Revere Elementary School, South Junior High School, and Katella High School. A demographic consultant for the ACSD conducted a survey of current student generation rates for residential projects in Southern California that are similar to the type of residential development that would occur in the Platinum Triangle, and found the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate fewer students than the number of students expected to be generated from the traditional housing type. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate new students within these school district boundaries that would necessitate the need for new school facilities. Additionally, the serving elementary school is located outside the boundaries of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area; therefore, project implementation would create a need for additional buses and supporting services. However, implementation of mitigation measures, including payment of school impact fees in compliance with Senate Bill 50, would reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Library Services As indicated in FSEIR No. 339, the Anaheim Public Library system consists of a central library, five branch libraries, and two bookmobiles. The nearest library facility to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is the Sunkist Branch Library located at 901 South Sunkist Avenue. A joint use library facility with the Anaheim City School District located at 2135 South Mountain View Avenue was under construction at the time of EIR preparation. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is also served by virtual Anaheim Library services through the network at the Central Library located at 500 West Broadway. According to FSEIR No. 339, implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would increase demand for library collections, staff, space, and services, resulting in a potentially significant impact. This impact would be reduced to a less than significant level through mitigation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-59 Day Care Services Privately owned and operated day care and child care centers are located throughout the City of Anaheim. Three day care centers are located within or in close proximity to the Platinum Triangle including Tara Hill Montessori School located at 2130 West Crescent Avenue, Childtime Learning Center located at 1000 South State College Boulevard, and Kinder Care Learning Center located at 2515 East Street. It was determined that development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would increase the demand for day care centers and child care facilities in the project area. However, permitting the uses in the PTMU Overlay Zone as primary and accessory uses would allow development of day care centers where necessary to serve the Platinum Triangle residents. Therefore, development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would not result in any adverse impact. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY Fire and Police Protection Services The proposed project involves an overall increase in the number of residential units (79 units) within the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable square footage for non-residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial) over what was previously analyzed. This equates to an additional 119 residents and a reduction of 648 employees. FSEIR No. 339 identified mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to fire and police protection services to below a level of significance, including the provision of buildings equipped with fire sprinklers, buildings designed with Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Guidelines (CPTED), and the collection of required impact fees. Through implementation of these existing mitigation measures, impacts to fire and police protection services will be reduced to less than significant. School Services As shown on Table 3.14-1, the addition of 79 residential units will generate 59 more K-12 students than was previously analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. However, as previously stated in FSEIR No. 339, when using a generation rate for residential projects in Southern California that are similar to the type of residential development that would occur in the Platinum Triangle, the addition of 79 residential units generates fewer students than the number of students expected to be generated from the traditional housing type. Implementation of existing mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No. 339, including payment of school impact fees in compliance with Senate Bill 50, would reduce school impacts to less than significant levels. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-60 Table 3.14-1 ACSD and AUHSD Student Generation Rates Proposed Additional Dwelling Units Type Generation Rates Additional Students 79 DU Elementary 0.3609 29 Jr. High 0.1040 8 High 0.1790 14 Total 0.7479 59 Source: FSEIR No. 339 Library Services The proposed project would add a potential of 119 new patrons including students to the library system. However, this impact would be reduced to a less than significant level through payment of developer fees identified in FSEIR No. 339. As a result, potential library service impacts were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. Day Care Services The addition of 79 residential units will generate 119 more residents than was previously analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. However, the potential number of babies and children generated from 79 residential units in the Platinum Triangle area is expected to be less than the number generated from the traditional housing type. Therefore, impacts to day care services will be less than significant and were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. Conclusion The proposed project will not significantly impact public services. As a result, potential public service impacts were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. The Platinum Gateway Project does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to public services. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-61 No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant public services effects identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions For new construction projects, the Anaheim Fire Department provides both building inspections and fire protection systems inspections. The Fire Department’s Life Safety Section conducts final inspections for all building permits within the City, except those for block walls, patios, and signs. All new developments are constructed to meet the requirements of the State Fire Marshal, such as building standards relating to fire, published in the latest California Building Standards Code and the California Fire Code. These standards include safe access in an emergency and location and placement of fire protection services and systems, including water supply, guidelines for the use and storage of combustible materials, and building construction for fire safety. These Standards also include compliance and monitoring inspections. Resolution No. 2006-149, Chapter 17.36, City of Anaheim. Public Safety Facilities and Vehicle and Equipment Impact fees for new and expanded development in the PTMU Overlay Zone Projects that develop within the PTMU Overlay Zone are required to pay a fire facilities fee consistent with the most recent City Council adopted fee resolution. Resolution No. 2006-149, Chapter 17.36, City of Anaheim. Public Safety Facilities and Vehicle and Equipment Impact Fees, requires future projects within the PTMU Overlay Zone to comply with the applicable provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code relevant to crime prevention and police services. Projects that develop within the PTMU Overlay Zone are required to pay police facilities fee consistent with the most recent City Council adopted fee resolution. Senate Bill 50 (Chapter 407 of Statutes of 1998) (SB 50). SB 50 sets forth a state school facilities construction program that includes restrictions on a local jurisdiction’s ability require on mitigation of a project’s impacts on school facilities in excess of fees set forth in Education ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-62 Code 17620. It establishes three potential limits for school districts, depending on the availability of new school construction funding from the state and the particular needs of the individual school districts. Level one is the general school facilities fees imposed in accordance with Government Code Section 65995 as amended. Level two and three fees are alternate fees that are intended to represent 50 percent or 100 percent of a school district’s school facility construction costs per new residential construction as authorized by GC Sections 65995.5, 65995.6, and 65995.7. As described in the impact analysis, SB 50 establishes a current level one fee of $2.97 per square foot for residential development and $0.47 per square foot for commercial/industrial projects. Projects that develop under the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone are required to pay a Library Fee per the Standard Platinum Triangle Development Agreement. Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339 The following mitigation measures are taken directly from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation measures apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project. 7-1 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed by the property owner/developer prior to each final Building and Zoning inspection. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-7, Mitigation Measure No. 7-1) 7-2 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for fire facilities and equipment impact fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-7, Mitigation Measure No. 7-2) 7-3 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including implementation of Ordinance 6016 and the concept of crime prevention through environmental design building design, circulation, site planning and lighting of parking structure and parking areas). Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking structures (for the police helicopter). Minimum size for numbers shall be four feet in height and two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to the parking structure and shall face the street to which the structure is addressed. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-11, Mitigation Measure No. 7-3) 7-4 Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Anaheim Police Department. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-63 Said measures shall be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning inspections. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-11, Mitigation Measure No. 7-4) 7-5 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit design plans that shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Anaheim Police Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim Police Department. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-11, Mitigation Measure No. 7-5) 7-6 Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim Police Department of Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fairshare basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7- 11, Mitigation Measure No. 7-6) 7-9 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the school impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Anaheim Union High School District and Anaheim City School District in compliance with Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section 65995 as amended). (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7- 19, Mitigation Measure No. 7-9) 3.15 Recreation SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FSEIR No. 339 states that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate additional residents (approximately 15,399 residents based upon 1.5 persons per dwelling unit) in the City of Anaheim. Based on the City’s goal of providing 2 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents, development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would require approximately 31 acres of parkland. According to FSEIR No. 339, the recently constructed 0.77- acre Magnolia Park located north of Katella Avenue at Auburn Way and Wright Circle is the only existing park facility within the Platinum Triangle area. FSEIR No. 339 also classifies large Park Deficiency Areas within the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. Therefore, FSEIR No. 339 concluded that development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would increase the demands on existing parks and recreational facilities that are already subject to overuse, resulting in a significant impact. To serve the demand for parks within the Platinum Triangle, developers of residential units in this area are required to pay higher park-in-lieu fees to provide the funding necessary for the development of future parks as residential uses are introduced into this area. Development on parcels eight acres or larger with over 325 residential units are required to provide and construct an on-site privately maintained public park, ensuring that small parks are distributed throughout the residentially developed portions of the Platinum Triangle. These mini-parks must be at a minimum size of 44 square feet per each dwelling unit within the proposed development. This park requirement is in addition to the payment of park-in-lieu fees; however, the value of the ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-64 parkland dedication is credited against the overall park-in-lieu fees paid for the project. This credit is given for parkland dedication only and does not include improvements to the park. In addition, every development is required to provide 200 square feet of recreational-leisure area for each dwelling unit within private and/or common areas. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation; the dedication of property to the City for park and recreational facilities; the development and maintenance of pocket parks by the developer or homeowners’ associations; and the payment of enhanced park-in-lieu fees as required under the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 18.20.110. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY The proposed project will allow for the development of up to 399 dwelling units, which will generate approximately 599 residents and create an increase in demand for recreational facilities. Based on the parkland, mini-park, and recreational-leisure requirements for projects located in the Platinum Triangle, the proposed project would require approximately 1.2 acres of parkland, a 17,556 square foot (0.40 acre) mini-park, and 79,800 square feet of recreational-leisure areas. These requirements will be met through the design of several recreational amenities and leisure areas throughout the project, including a 17,570 square foot public park, and 88,610 square feet of recreation-leisure areas comprising of six landscaped courtyards, an entry courtyard, a club house and fitness center, landscaped areas along East Katella Avenue, South Lewis Street and the Connector Street, as well as private spaces connected to each dwelling unit. The park will contain a variety of active and passive amenities, including a children’s playground, a fenced multi-use open turf play area, group picnic shelters with two barbecues, game tables, picnic tables, park benches, dog waste bag dispensers and enhanced accent paving. The six landscaped courtyards will each have their own unique theme, such as the pool, lounge, garden, patio, and kitchen. As identified in FSEIR No. 339, the Platinum Gateway Project will be required to pay Platinum Triangle park in-lieu fees per the City’s parkland requirement. Collectively, these recreational amenities and park in-lieu fees meet the park dedication requirement and conditions, including PTMU Overlay Zone standards with respect to amount of private recreational space per unit. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will not have any increased impact on the demand for recreational services and park space above that identified in the EIR, because the project includes on-site recreation and facilities, and the project applicant is required to pay community park fees. The proposed project includes a number of recreational amenities to accommodate recreation demand on site, including a children’s park, pool, spa and barbecue area. Therefore, the proposed project would not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to recreation. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-65 No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant recreation impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 18.20.110.010. Authorized by the Quimby Act, the City of Anaheim requires new development to pay a fee or dedicate land for park and recreation facilities. Developers of parcels eight acres or larger with more than 325 residential units shall provide and construct an on-site public park at a minimum size of 44 square feet per unit. Said park shall be bounded on at least one side by a public street with on-street parking. This requirement is in addition to the payment of park-in-lieu fees; however, the value of the parkland dedication will be credited against overall park-in-lieu fees paid for the project. This credit will be given for park land dedication only. No credit will be given for improvements to the park or for required recreational-leisure areas. Parcels less than eight acres in size shall pay park-in-lieu fees. If the number of residential development totals 325 units or less, that construction of a park is not required. Park Fees. All residential dwelling unit development within the PTMU Overlay Zone requires payment of the Platinum Triangle Park In Lieu Fees as adopted by the City Council and as amended from time to time. If the property is eight or more acres in size, the property owner will dedicate, develop and maintain a mini-park substantially in conformance with an approved final site plan for the project. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-66 3.16 Transportation / Traffic SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would significantly impact levels of service (LOS) for the roadway system due to the increased number of trips generated by the project. However, with implementation of planned roadway improvements by responsible agencies such as Caltrans and the City of Orange, all arterial roadways and intersections would operate at an acceptable LOS or no worse than No Project conditions. FSEIR No. 339 determined that 31 intersections in the Platinum Triangle area would operate at an LOS E or F and would require mitigation. With proposed improvements, such as roadway widening, restriping, facility upgrades, etc., all impacted intersections in the Platinum Triangle area would operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. FSEIR No. 339 also identified six segments in the City of Orange and four arterial segments in the City of Anaheim that would have significant impacts with implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Mitigation measures were identified for these deficient arterial segments to operate at an acceptable LOS. Implementation of the recommended improvements was projected to reduce impacted intersections LOS to a less than significant level. However, mitigation measures recommended for 13 impacted intersections were determined to be infeasible and project impacts were identified as significant and unavoidable. Not all identified improvements would be feasible due to a number of reasons such as the inability to undertake right-of-way acquisitions as a matter of policy to preserve existing businesses, environmental constraints, or jurisdictional consideration. Additionally, it was anticipated that a number of improvements would have been economically infeasible due to the anticipated costs of some of the improvements. Inasmuch as the primary responsibility for approving and/or completing certain improvements located outside of Anaheim would lie with agencies other than the City of Anaheim City of Orange and Caltrans), the potential was identified that significant impacts may not be fully mitigated if such improvements are not completed for reasons beyond the City of Anaheim’s control the City of Anaheim cannot undertake or require improvements outside of Anaheim’s jurisdiction or the City cannot construct improvements in the Caltrans right-of-way without Caltrans approval) and the project’s traffic impact would remain significant. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this impact. Since the major freeway facilities within the study area, I-5, SR-22, and SR-57 have reached their design capacity or will have reached it by 2030 and the required physical improvements are largely the result of background regional traffic, consultation between the City of Anaheim and Caltrans was determined to be necessary to reach consensus on any potential operational improvement measures. State highway facilities within the study area are not within the jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim. Improvements to State Highway Systems were deemed to be matters of federal, State, regional, and local concern and are planned, funded, and constructed by the State of California through a legislative and political process involving the State ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-67 Legislature; the California Transportation Commission; the California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency; Caltrans; and OCTA. Therefore, impacts to Caltrans facilities were identified as significant and unavoidable. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this impact. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY Change in Traffic Impacts Due to the Revised Project FSEIR No. 339 analyzed the following maximum development intensities for the project site: 320 dwelling units, 209,419 square feet of office development, and 114,571 square feet of commercial use. According to trip generation rates derived from the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model, these previously approved development intensities have the potential to generate a total of approximately 8,892 ADT, including 518 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 885 trips in the p.m. peak hour. As shown on the following Table 3.16-1, Project Trip Generation Comparison, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project is forecast to generate 6,433 fewer ADT than the previously approved project. This represents a 72 percent reduction in ADT which similarly reduces the overall traffic impacts related to the proposed project by 72 percent. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-68 Table 3.16-1 Project Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Size Units Total AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT In Out Total In Out Total Existing Maximum Development Intensities Residential 320 DU 2,563 64 150 214 144 90 234 General Office 209,419 TSF 3,210 385 48 433 73 356 429 Commercial 114,571 TSF 5,786 16 9 25 244 244 488 Subtotal 11,559 465 208 673 461 690 1,151 Internal Capture Reduction (14.53%) -1,680 -68 -30 -98 -67 -100 -167 Subtotal 9,880 398 178 575 394 589 984 Transit Reduction (Additional 10%) -988 -40 -18 -58 -39 -59 -98 Total Previously Approved for the Platinum Gateway Site 8,892 358 160 518 355 530 885 Proposed Project (399-Dwelling Unit Platinum Gateway) Residential 399 DU 3,196 80 188 267 180 112 291 Subtotal 3,196 80 188 267 180 112 291 Internal Capture Reduction (14.53%) -464 -12 -27 -39 -26 -16 -42 Subtotal 2,732 68 160 228 153 95 249 Transit Reduction (Additional 10%) -273 -7 -16 -23 -15 -10 -25 Total Proposed Project 2,458 61 144 206 138 86 224 Change in Trip Generation with Proposed Project -6,433 -297 -16 -312 -217 -445 -661 Note: Trip generation rates were derived from the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model, provided by the City of Anaheim. This traffic impact analysis update represents a worst case condition and evaluates the potential traffic and circulation impacts associated with the development of the Platinum Gateway Project. Issues addressed in this analysis include off-site intersection impacts, site access, and interface with the arterial street system. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-69 Specifically, this traffic impact analysis examined the proposed development of 399 residential units with an associated parking structure and public park. Primary access to the project site will be provided by a full access driveway (Connector Street) along Lewis Street located north of the project and a right-in/right-out access driveway (Connector Street) along Katella Avenue located east of the project. The north and east Connector Streets along the northerly and easterly boundaries of the project site, will not only provide access and circulation to the project site, but to the adjacent properties to the north and east as well. The following intersections were analyzed as part of the proposed project’s study area: • Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound ramps-Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue • Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue • Lewis Street/Katella Avenue • State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue • Sportstown/Katella Avenue • Howell Street/Katella Avenue • State Route 57 (SR-57) southbound ramps/Katella Avenue • SR-57 northbound ramps/Katella Avenue Existing Conditions Existing Circulation System Key roadways in the vicinity of the proposed project are as follows: • Interstate 5. The I-5 freeway is located southwest of the project site and is a major freeway that extends throughout Orange County. The I-5 freeway in the project vicinity has four to five mixed flow lanes and one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each (northbound and southbound) direction. Primary access to the project site from the I-5 freeway is provided via northbound and southbound on/off-ramps at Katella Avenue. • Katella Avenue. Katella Avenue is the southern boundary of the project site and provides access to the project site via a right-in/right-out driveway. This roadway is designated as an east-west Stadium Area Smart Street (eight-lane divided) in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Katella Avenue is also designated as a Congestion Management Program (CMP) facility. • State College Boulevard. State College Boulevard is located east of the project site. This roadway is designated as a north-south Major Arterial (six-lane divided) in the City General Plan Circulation Element. The roadway is built out to its master-planned lane geometrics. • State Route 57 (SR-57). SR-57 is located east of the project site and is a freeway that extends through Orange County. Direct access to the project site from SR-57 is provided ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-70 via northbound and southbound on/off ramps at Katella Avenue. The SR-57 freeway has five mixed flow lanes and one HOV lane in each direction through Anaheim. • Lewis Street. Lewis Street is located immediately to the west of the project. Access to Lewis Street is provided at the Connector Street. This roadway is designated as a Secondary Arterial (four-lane undivided) in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Existing Intersection Level of Service Analysis Peak-hour turn volumes for the study area intersections were obtained from the previous KHR study which was collected in 2006 and 2007. Based on discussion with the City Traffic Engineering staff, LSA confirmed the use of the traffic counts from the previous study. Based on review of historical count data, the traffic counts along majority of the freeways, arterial and secondary streets around the Platinum Triangle area have gone down after 2006 and 2007. The traffic volumes in 2011 and 2012 have not returned to 2006 and 2007 levels. Therefore, analyzing the existing conditions using the 2006 and 2007 counts would present a conservative analysis. As shown on the following Table 3.16-2, the traffic impact analysis determined that all study area intersections operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 3.16-2 Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS V/C LOS V/C 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.380 A 0.400 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.520 B 0.650 3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue A 0.460 B 0.630 4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue A 0.570 A 0.590 5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.280 A 0.390 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.350 A 0.340 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.420 A 0.390 8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.450 A 0.490 Notes: Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study. Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008). Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-71 Opening Year (2016) Baseline Conditions According to the project applicant, the proposed residential project will be completed by 2016. Consistent with the previous KHR study, to determine a future (2016) condition, traffic volumes for other committed and/or approved (cumulative) developments were added to the existing baseline traffic volumes. In addition, a growth factor of 6 percent was added to the existing baseline traffic volumes. Consistent with the previous KHR study, 14 cumulative projects were identified in the opening year (2016) condition. The following development projects are being proposed in the vicinity of the project: 1. Stadium Lofts (1,801 E. Katella Avenue): 7,839 sf restaurants, 2,820 sf retail, 390 apartments; 2. Avalon Bay (2100 E. Katella Avenue): 261 apartments, 2,740 sf retail, and 10,000 sf restaurant; 3. The Hanover Company (1818 S. State College Boulevard): 266 apartments; 4. Anavia (2045 S. State College Boulevard): 265 apartments; 5. Gateway (2150 S. State College Boulevard): 884 apartments; 6. Platinum Triangle Condominiums (1331 E. Katella Avenue): 337 condominiums; 7. Park Viridian (1515 E. Katella Avenue): 320 apartments, 451 condominiums; 8. Lennar A-Town Metro (1404 E. Katella Avenue): 2,681 residential units, and 150,000 sf of commercial use; 9. Platinum Tower (2210–2220 E. Orangewood Avenue): 591,500 sf office and 8,500 sf retail; 10. Orangewood Condominiums (2211 E. Orangewood Avenue): 325 condominiums; 11. Lennar A-Town Stadium (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue): 525 condominiums; 12. Platinum Vista (1105 E. Katella Avenue): 350 residential units; 13. Gene Autry Experience (1969 S. State College Boulevard): 1,208 condominiums, 100,000 sf office and 50,000 sf retail; and 14. Alexan Orangewood (2020 and 2100 E. Orangewood Avenue): 690 apartments. The project trip generation for the approved and pending projects was calculated using trip rates documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (7th Edition) and is presented in the following Table 3.16-3. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-72 Table 3.16-3 Cumulative Projects Trip Generation Land Use Size Units Total AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT In Out Total In Out Total Stadium Lofts (1801 E. Katella Avenue) Condominiums1 390/ 10.66 DU/ TSF 1,732 60 160 220 109 45 154 Avalon Bay (2100 E. Katella Avenue) Apartment/Retail/Restaurant2 261/ 2.74/10 DU/ TSF 3,033 105 145 250 158 114 272 The Hanover Company (1818 S. State College Boulevard) Apartments2 266 DU 1,721 30 119 149 102 55 157 Anavia (2045 S. State College Boulevard) Apartments2 265 DU 1,715 30 119 149 102 55 157 Gateway (2150 S. State College Boulevard) Apartments2 884 DU 5,860 71 380 451 371 177 548 Platinum Triangle Condominiums (1331 E. Katella Avenue) Condominiums3 337/ 1.300 DU/ TSF 2,286 65 125 190 119 89 208 Park Viridian (1515 E. Katella Avenue) Apartments/Condominiums4 320/ 451 DU 4,988 146 285 431 262 193 455 Lennar A-Town Metro (1404 E. Katella Avenue) Residential/Commercial5 2,681/ 150 DU/ TSF 19,418 -171 780 608 1,108 517 1,624 Platinum Tower (2210–2220 E. Orangewood Avenue) Office/Retail2 591.5/ 8.5 TSF 9,965 1,049 133 1,182 250 1,017 1,267 Orangewood Condominiums (2211 E. Orangewood Avenue) Condominiums6 325 DU 2,103 62 120 182 111 81 192 Lennar A-Town Stadium (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue) Condominiums7 525 DU 8,941 32 371 403 485 225 710 ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-73 Table 3.16-3 Cumulative Projects Trip Generation Platinum Vista (1105 E. Katella Avenue) Residential8 350 DU 2,352 36 143 179 141 76 217 Gene Autry Experience (1969 S. State College Boulevard) Condominium/Office/Retail9 1208/ 100/ 50 DU/ TSF 8,607 88 328 416 436 298 734 Alexan Orangewood (2020 and 2100 E. Orangewood Avenue) Apartments10 690 DU 2,898 -63 126 63 138 -22 116 Total Trip Generation 75,619 1,540 3,334 4,873 3,892 2,920 6,811 Notes: 1 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Lofts Mixed-Use Development, dated September 2004. 2 Trip generation provided by City of Anaheim Traffic Engineering Staff. 3 Trlp generation based on Anaheim Transportation Analysis for the Platinum Triangle Condominium, dated June 2005. 4 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Park Residential Development, dated December 2004. 5 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Metro, dated August 2005. 6 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Orangewood Condominiums, dated September 2006. 7 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Stadium, dated June 2006. 8 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Platinum Vista, dated July 2012. 9 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Gene Autry Experience, dated February 2007. 10 Trip generation based on Alexan Orangewood Traffic Impact Study, dated January 17, 2008. Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012 Opening Year (2016) Intersection Level of Service Analysis The following Table 3.16-4 Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary, summarizes the results of the future a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all study area intersections. As this table indicates, all study area intersections will continue to operate at acceptable LOS (D or better) during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-74 Table 3.16-4 Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS V/C LOS V/C 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.480 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.590 C 0.750 3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue C 0.750 D 0.840 4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue C 0.780 D 0.830 5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.400 A 0.550 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.420 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.490 A 0.460 8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue B 0.660 B 0.670 Notes: Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008). Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012 Project Impacts Trip Generation The proposed project considers development of 399 residential dwelling units. The daily and peak-hour trips for the residential use were generated using trip rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition (2003). The proposed project has the potential to generate approximately 2,681 average daily traffic (ADT), including 203 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 247 trips in the p.m. peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution defines the regional percentage origins and destinations for a project. Trip distribution for the proposed project is based on trip distribution used in the previous KHR study. Approximately 5 percent of the trips are destined north via Lewis Street; 20 percent north via I-5; 5 percent north via State College Boulevard; 15 percent north via SR-57; 10 percent south via Lewis street; 15 percent south via I-5; 5 percent south via State College Boulevard; 10 percent south via SR-57; 5 percent west via Katella Avenue; and 10 percent east via Katella Avenue. LSA adjusted the trip distribution along Anaheim Way and Manchester Avenue to reflect the one-way streets and actual freeway. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-75 Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Condition Traffic generated by the project was added to the future traffic volumes at each study area intersection. Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Summary Analysis Table 3.16-5 summarizes the results of the future plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all study area intersections. As this table indicates, all study area intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS LOS D or better) in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the exception of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The project will significantly impact the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue based on the City’s significance criteria. The project will add traffic resulting in a volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio change greater than the City threshold of 0.030. However, this impact was previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339, and the widening of Katella Avenue to its ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will mitigate the project impacts. Widening of Katella Avenue is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and will be constructed before the construction of the proposed project. Special Issues Project Access As illustrated in the previous Exhibit 2.2-1, Conceptual Site Plan, access to the project site will be provided via a full-access primary Connector Street along Lewis Street and a right-in/right- out secondary Connector Street along Katella Avenue. The Connector Street along Lewis Street is located along the northerly boundary of the project site while the Connector Street along Katella Avenue is located along the easterly boundary of the project site. Each Connector Street is approximately 26 feet wide. Access to the parking garage is provided by the two (northerly and easterly) Connector Streets. These full accesses are also 26 feet wide. The easterly Connector Street (which connects to Katella Avenue) will also provide access to the future Platinum Vista development. The proposed plans for the adjacent development shows two access driveways from the easterly Connector Street. Traffic generated by the proposed project and the future Platinum Vista project will be distributed along the Connector Streets, as shown on Exhibit 3.16-1, Opening Year (2016) Project Traffic Volumes. Based on direction from the City, an all-way stop control analysis was conducted for the three access locations along the easterly Connector Street for both the proposed project and the adjacent Platinum Vista project for the Opening Year (2016) with project conditions. Based on criteria from Section 2B.07 - Multiway Stop Applications from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), it was determined that all-way stop control was not recommended at the three locations. The intersections should be controlled by stop sign at the project accesses with uncontrolled traffic operation along the easterly connector. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-76 Table 3.16-5 Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Opening Year No Project Conditions Opening Year Plus Project Conditions Difference in V/C Ratio AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C V/C V/C 1. Manchester Ave/ Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.480 A 0.480 A 0.480 0.010 0.000 2. Anaheim Way/ Katella Avenue A 0.590 C 0.750 A 0.600 C 0.750 0.010 0.000 3. Lewis Street/ Katella Avenue C 0.750 D 0.840 D 0.820 E 0.940 0.070 0.100 4. State College Blvd/ Katella Avenue C 0.780 D 0.830 C 0.790 D 0.850 0.010 0.020 5. Sportstown/ Katella Avenue A 0.400 A 0.550 A 0.420 A 0.560 0.020 0.010 6. SR-57 SB Ramps/ Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.420 A 0.480 A 0.420 0.010 0.000 7. SR-57 NBRamps/ Katella Avenue A 0.490 A 0.460 A 0.500 A 0.470 0.010 0.010 8. Howell Avenue/ Katella Avenue B 0.660 B 0.670 B 0.680 B 0.680 0.020 0.010 Notes: Bold V/C Ratio = Significant Impact Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008). Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- NTS Exhibit 3.16-1 OPENING YEAR (2016) PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA TEMPLETON P L A N N I N G G R O U P XX/YY AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes LEGEND Source: LSA, September 2012 PLATINUM VISTA (NOT A PART) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-78 Additionally, a traffic signal analysis was conducted at the locations where the Connector Streets intersect Lewis Street and Katella Avenue for the Opening Year (2016) with project conditions. The peak hour volume at the connector intersections is low and they do not satisfy the peak hour signal warrant. Therefore, a signal is not recommended in the Opening Year (2016) condition. California Department of Transportation Analysis According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002), LOS at an intersection is analyzed utilizing the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology. Traffix Version 8.0 computer software was used to determine the LOS at Caltrans intersections based on the HCM methodology. Based on Caltrans traffic impact study guidelines, Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D on State highway facilities. However, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS. Consistent with Caltrans methodology, intersection LOS at four State facilities were analyzed using the HCM 2000 methodology for the existing with and without project conditions. The following study area intersections were included in this analysis: • Manchester Avenue/I-5 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue • Anaheim Way/I-5 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue • SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue • SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Table 3.16-6 summarizes the results of the existing (with and without project) a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for the signalized intersections identified above utilizing the HCM methodology. Based on the Caltrans methodology, all State facilities are forecast to operate at LOS B or better in the existing (with and without project) conditions. Recommended Circulation Improvements Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed project, consisting of 399 dwelling units, would exceed the City’s performance criteria at one study area intersection in the opening year (2016) horizon. However, this impact was previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339, and the following City-initiated geometric improvements for the impacted study area intersection, which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements, would improve the intersection capacity utilization (ICU) and/or reduce the ICU to the baseline condition. Opening Year (2016) Conditions Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The proposed project will increase the LOS at the intersection from LOS C to LOS D with an ICU increase of greater than 0.03 at LOS D in the a.m. peak and from LOS D to LOS E with an ICU increase of greater than 0.01 in p.m. peak hour during the Opening Year (2016) condition. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-79 Table 3.16-6 Caltrans Methodology Level of Service Summary Intersection Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay 1. Manchester Ave/Katella Avenue B 16.5 B 13.3 B 17.3 B 14.2 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue B 15.5 B 18.9 B 15.5 B 18.9 6. SR-57 SB Ramps/Katella Avenue B 16.3 B 14.8 B 16.4 B 15.1 7. SR-57 NBRamps/Katella Avenue B 17.3 A 9.6 B 17.3 A 9.4 Notes: HCM Delay ratio is used for signalized intersections in the City of Anaheim. Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study. Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012 The addition of a fourth lane in the westbound direction would offset the project’s impact at this intersection during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The recommended improvement will decrease the Opening Year (2016) ICU and LOS from 0.82 (LOS D) to 0.720 (LOS C) in the a.m. peak hour and LOS from 0.94 (LOS E) to 0.79 (LOS C) in the p.m. peak hour. Widening Katella Avenue to its ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will provide the additional westbound through lane at the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The widening of Katella Avenue (4 lanes in the westbound direction) is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and is funded by the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District (CFD). The construction of this widening project will begin in the first quarter of 2013 and is scheduled to be completed in 9 months. Conclusion Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed development of 399 residential units can be implemented and continue to maintain satisfactory mobility and circulation system performance. Evaluation of intersection LOS shows that the addition of the project traffic to the opening year (2016) baseline traffic volumes will significantly impact the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue, according to the City’s performance criteria. However, this impact was previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339, and the widening of Katella Avenue to its ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will mitigate the project impacts. Widening of Katella Avenue is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and will be constructed before the construction of the proposed project. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-80 Additionally, overall traffic related impacts would be reduced by 72 percent compared to the previously analyzed uses for the project site due to the reduction of office and commercial uses. Implementation of existing mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No. 339 will further reduce impacts to transportation and traffic. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new impacts beyond what was evaluated in FSEIR No. 339. As a result, potential traffic impacts were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. The Platinum Gateway Project does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to transportation and traffic. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant circulation and transportation effects identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions Traffic Fee Program. Any development in the City of Anaheim is required to pay transportation impact fees per the Anaheim Municipal Code. These fees go towards the funding of the completion of the City of Anaheim Circulation Element. In addition, within the Platinum Triangle, any development shall participate in the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District, which will fund infrastructure improvements throughout the Platinum Triangle, including transportation infrastructure requirements. As set forth above, the City shall sufficiently fund required Project related improvements. The City of Anaheim has historically utilized a variety of strategies to provide improvements to the citywide circulation system. The City currently has a traffic fee program in place to fund General Plan improvements assumed ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-81 under build-out No Project and With Project conditions. The City has a long-standing policy that as development occurs throughout the City, traffic studies are prepared to demonstrate the need for implementation of the improvements identified in the General Plan, and developer fees and other local dedicated taxes will contribute to those improvements as needed. The fee, initially developed in 1993 and updated as needed to include new facilities and updated Capital Improvement Programs, provides a proper nexus between increased development in the City and associated traffic impacts to the citywide circulation system. Developers contribute fees to the City, which uses the fund to implement circulation improvements in the City or as the City of Anaheim’s local match for leveraging funding from OCTA and Caltrans for circulation system improvements. Hence, the general plan improvements assumed in the build-out of the Platinum Triangle, prior to the approval of this plan, are expected to be paid for and implemented through the City’s existing traffic impact fee program. Community Facilities District. The City of Anaheim currently has a Community Facilities District (CFD) in place associated with development in the Platinum Triangle. All projects, regardless of size, are required to contribute to the CFD. The CFD is expected to contribute funds to all infrastructure needs in the Platinum Triangle, including transportation. Nearly all of the mitigation measures in this study within the Platinum Triangle and the City of Orange are already identified within the CFD. The CFD is programmed to provide funding for improvements in the Platinum Triangle identified previously and this study has identified additional improvements that will need to funded on a fair-share basis. Under this Traffic Study and EIR, the City will provide fair-share funding for all of the intersection improvements in the City of Orange and the additional deficient intersections within the City of Anaheim not currently identified within the CFD, as well as fairshare funding to implement appropriate Caltrans facility improvements. If the costs of identified improvements cannot be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing CFD, other fee programs or update of the existing fee programs may have to be implemented to complete the recommended improvements. For locations within the City of Anaheim and Orange, the fairshares for improvements will dictate the fair-share cost, priorities, and timeframe of the improvements. For intersections or arterial segments where the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project contributes a higher share of traffic to the build-out of the area, those improvements will be a higher priority. The City has proposed improvement strategies that return all intersections to an acceptable LOS under the 2030 With Project scenario. The fair-share calculations identify that the Proposed Project contributes a range of 7 percent to 44 percent of trips to study area intersections. The Proposed Project would contribute that percentage toward the costs of the recommended improvements. Intersection and arterial segment improvements in the City of Orange will have fees contributed to them by the Proposed Project, commensurate with the fair-share analysis. Although these improvements will be overridden in this SEIR, because Anaheim does not have jurisdiction over the facilities, the project will be responsible for contributions for the appropriate fair-share toward the recommended improvements. Fee Assessment and Fair-Share for Improvements: The City of Anaheim has applied a fairshare methodology to evaluate the financial responsibility of mitigating Platinum Triangle project impacts. The methodology is consistent with that outlined in the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. Appendix directing users to use a formula to ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-82 calculate equitable share responsibility for the traffic impacts of proposed projects. For impacts that are located in adjacent cities where the intersection becomes deficient under the With Project condition, a fair-share to an improvement cost that achieves acceptable performance is warranted. The fair-share calculation is based on the difference between the Future With Project and Future No Project total intersection entering volumes divided by the total growth entering volume from Existing to Future With Project conditions. The fair-share proportion is based on the value associated with the peak hour for which the deficiency has been identified. A computational example of the fair-share analysis is provided in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 2010. Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339 The following mitigation measures related to traffic were previously adopted in connection to FSEIR No. 339. These measures would also be applicable to this proposed Platinum Gateway Project. 9-4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees, Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the property owner/developer; and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-112, Mitigation Measure No. 9-4) 9-5 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-112, Mitigation Measure No. 9-5) 9-6 Prior to approval of a Development Agreement for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property owner/developers shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when the improvements identified in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010 (Appendix F of this SEIR) shall be designed and constructed. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to implement traffic improvements as identified in the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339, Orange County Congestion Management Program and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-83 phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-113, Mitigation Measure No. 9-6) 9-7 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair-share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-share calculations shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-way, and construction costs, unless alternative funding sources have been identified to help pay for the improvement. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-113, Mitigation Measure No. 9-7) 9-8 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation with the City of Orange: a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair-share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis. b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange. c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-84 d) The City shall work with the City of Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure that fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial and intersection impacts in the City of Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-113, Mitigation Measure No. 9-8) 9-9 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans: a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s proportionate impact on the specific freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339 and established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. b) The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with Caltrans. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-114, Mitigation Measure No. 9-9) 9-10 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-114, Mitigation Measure No. 9-10) 9-11 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts generated by the project. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-114, Mitigation Measure No. 9-11) 9-14 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-115, Mitigation Measure No. 9-14) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-85 9-15 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-115, Mitigation Measure No. 9-15) 3.17 Utilities and Service Systems SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FSEIR No. 339 analyzed impacts to utilities and service systems including wastewater treatment, water supply, storm drainage, solid waste, electricity, natural gas, and communications. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that the potential impacts to public utilities and services could be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Wastewater Treatment and Collection According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is served by the City of Anaheim’s local sanitary sewer collection system, which is a tributary to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), District 2. Wastewater from the City sewer system is conveyed to OCSD’s trunk and interceptor sewers to regional treatment and disposal facilities. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is served by the Newhope-Placentia Trunk (State College Avenue), the Olive Subtrunk, the Orangewood Diversion Sewer, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) line. It was determined in FSEIR No. 339 that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would require sewer improvements to accommodate project buildout. With implementation of these improvements, the sewer system was anticipated to accommodate development within the Platinum Triangle based on future buildout conditions. With implementation of the mitigation measures in FSEIR No. 339, no significant unavoidable impacts were identified. Further, it was determined that the potential for sewer spills during a ten-year storm event would be low and would not represent a significant impact. Water Supply and Distribution Systems The City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Water Division provides water service to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. As of 2007–2008, the City received approximately 79 percent of its water supply from its groundwater wells and 21 percent from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The MWD contracts for water from the State Water Project (SWP) and the Colorado River. According to FSEIR No. 339, buildout of the Platinum Triangle would result in a total water demand of 5,249 acre-feet per year. A comparison of projected demand and supply concluded that there are adequate water supplies to meet the water ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-86 demand created by the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. According to the Water Supply Assessment (WSA), there would be surplus water through the 20-year planning period. Rule 15-D of Anaheim’s Water Rules, Rates and Regulations (Plan No. W2524D) specifies the water facility improvements required to accommodate the projected land use water demands within the City, including the Platinum Triangle. Under Rule 15-D, a new 3,500 gallons per minute (gpm) Well No. 45 was constructed in 2003, and currently supplies most of the demands in and around the Platinum Triangle area. Ultimately, changes in land use projections and addition of water facilities will require updating Rule 15-D; however, under existing Rule 15-D, the projected demands for new office, commercial, and industrial land uses have already been accounted for in determining water facility improvements. The only significant changes, in terms of projected demand quantity for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, were the demands resulting from new residential dwelling units. Once the City approves the necessary improvements, Rule 15-D and associated rates and figures will be revised. According to FSEIR No. 339, compliance with Rule 15-D would ensure that adequate water facilities are provided to serve the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan would not adversely impact the water delivery system. Storm Drain According to FSEIR No. 339, the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area (prepared in January 2006) identifies that the existing storm drainage system under the existing condition in the Platinum Triangle at the time of FSEIR No. 339 preparation was deficient. The analysis determined that specific projects would be evaluated by the City Engineer to determine if they are located within an area served by deficient drainage facilities as identified in the appropriate drainage study; it also determined that the developments in the Platinum Triangle would be required to incorporate additional local systems into their plans to meet the City’s current drainage criteria in terms of street flooding limits and other surface flow parameters. Construction of these facilities would occur in compliance with the standard engineering rules and regulations and would not result in a significant environmental effect. Solid Waste According to FSEIR No. 339, the Olinda Alpha Landfill is the closest facility to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area and would be the solid waste facility most often receiving waste from the project site. Development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would increase the service demand for solid waste disposal beyond existing conditions and would provide more solid waste to the Olinda Alpha Landfill. Development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate a total of 372,457 pounds (168 tons) of solid waste per day. However, the Orange County Landfill System has demonstrated this capacity and regularly imports solid waste from Los Angeles County. Therefore, it was determined that there would be available landfill capacity in the Orange County landfills to accommodate the anticipated solid waste stream generated by implementation of the PTMLUP, individually and cumulatively. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-87 Additionally, implementation of the PTMLUP would generate increased construction and operational solid waste in the area. However, it was determined that each development project in the project area would be required to submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Development projects in the project area would be required to comply with the City’s existing recycling and diversion programs, which would reduce impacts generated by the additional development density to a less than significant level. Electricity According to FSEIR No. 339, the Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD), Electrical Division provides electricity to Anaheim’s citizens and businesses. Implementation of the PTMLUP would increase the electrical load on existing facilities and require upgrades to the existing 12 kilovolt distribution systems. A number of electric utility improvements were identified as either in the planning stages or would be required in the future to serve the Platinum Triangle development, including a new electrical substation. The APUD anticipates that impacts resulting from the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, assuming all identified improvements are implemented, would be within the expansion capabilities of the existing service and such expansion would not be detrimental to the environment. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that impact on electrical service would be considered less than significant. Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company (SCG) provides natural gas service in the City of Anaheim and has facilities throughout the City, including the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. FSEIR No. 339 states that implementation of the PTMLUP would increase the natural gas demand in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area and would require an additional 1.5 miles of gas transmission pipelines; placement of at least two additional pressure limiting stations; and alteration of at least three miles of existing gas mains in the area to increase capacity. With necessary system upgrades and facility improvements, SCG would be able to service the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area with natural gas, which would be provided in accordance with SCG’s policies and extension rules on file with the Public Utilities Commission when the contractual arrangements are made. Although the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project was found to create additional demands on natural gas supplies and distribution infrastructure, the increased demands would be within the service capabilities of SCG, provided necessary improvements are made in coordination with SCG. FSEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the PTMLUP would not result in any unavoidable adverse impacts to natural gas service or resources. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-88 Communications AT&T and Time-Warner provide telephone and cable television service to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area, respectively. According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to telephone service systems or cable television service were identified through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to telephone service systems or cable television service. IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY FSEIR No. 339 included analysis of the effects of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project on utilities and service systems. The FSEIR identified that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project and cumulative development that might affect utilities and service systems will not result in service deficiencies. In addition, a Preliminary On-Site Sewer System Study was prepared for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project (see Appendix F) which compares the estimated sewer flows that will be generated by the proposed project to the flows that would have been generated by the previously approved uses on the project site. The sewer study determined that the proposed project will generate approximately 256,194 gallons per day, which is a reduction of 402,502 gallons per day, or 61% less sewer flow compared to the previously approved project. The study also assessed whether the recently installed Katella Avenue sewer will have sufficient capacity to handle flows from the proposed project. It was determined that the Katella sewer has spare capacity and the flows from the Platinum Gateway Project can be accommodated. Similarly, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project will generate less demand for other utilities and service systems compared to the previously analyzed demand in FSEIR No. 339 due to the decrease in land use intensities on the project site. Fees will be collected at time of development to ensure that improvements tied to the proposed project will not negatively impact service providers. FSEIR No. 339 also identified mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to utilities and service systems to below a level of significance. As a result, potential utilities and service systems impacts were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. The Platinum Gateway Project does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to utilities and service systems. Major EIR Revisions Not Required Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-89 No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more of the significant utilities and service system impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No. 339. Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339 The following mitigation measures are taken directly from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation measures apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project. 10-1 The City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as identified in the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the project area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-38, Mitigation Measure No. 10-1) 10-2 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner/developer shall coordinate with the OCSD to ensure that all improvements and construction schedules are coordinated. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10- 39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-2) 10-3 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-90 contact Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding sewer capacity. Additionally, if requested by the OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a month to verify capacity and ensure consistency with the OCSD’s modeling results. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-3) 10-4 Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for each development project, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade structures of the proposed development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Where requested by the City Engineer, sewer improvements shall be constructed with larger than recommended diameter to maintain the surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above the hydraulic grade line elevation of the surcharge levels when they are above the pipe crown. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-4) 10-5 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where OCSD will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD to ensure that backflow prevention devices are installed by OCSD at the lateral connections to prevent surcharge flow from entering private properties. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-5) 10-6 Prior to final design approval, additional analysis shall be performed and provided for each individual project using flow, wet-weather data, and other information specific for that project in order to obtain more accurate results of the surcharge levels for final design. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-6) 10-7 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:  Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible;  Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash down of exterior areas;  Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals;  Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;  Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors;  Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;  Low-flow shower heads in hotels;  Infrared sensors on drinking fountains; ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-91  Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are lowest;  Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using appliances;  Cooling tower recirculating system;  Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;  Use of waterway recirculation systems;  Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation; and  Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available. In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-7) 10-8 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide engineering studies, including network analysis, to size the water mains for ultimate development within the project. This includes detailed water usage analysis and building plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval in determining project water requirements and appropriate water assessment fees. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-40, Mitigation Measure No. 10-8) 10-9 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet. (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures) (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-40, Mitigation Measure No. 10-9) 10-12 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-12) 10-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient appliances. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-13) 10-14 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines and use recycled water when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-14) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-92 10-17 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located within an area served by deficient drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the project will increase stormwater flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate master plan drainage study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient storm drain system or will create a deficiency in an existing storm drain, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the drainage facilities, as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final Building and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-42, Mitigation Measure No. 10-17) 10-18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at its discretion, the following plan components:  Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities.  Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.  Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.  Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection.  Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible.  Prohibiting curbside pick-up.  Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and city regulations. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-42, Mitigation Measure No. 10-18) 10-19 Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer: ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-93  Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.  Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.  Collection of office paper for recycling.  Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-19) 10-20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-20) 10-22 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance with Title 24, which may include the following:  High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.  Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.  Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.  Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.  Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.  Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors compressor motors, air- handling units, and fan-coil units).  Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.  Use of compact fluorescent lamps.  Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.  Use of ® exit lighting or exit signage.  Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified.  Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high- pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots.  Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods.  Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-94 o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems. o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per kWh saved for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency that exceed Title 24 requirements.. o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.  Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush [gpf] or less).  Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).  Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.  Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-44, Mitigation Measure No. 10-22) 10-23 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities:  Relocate Southern California Edison transmission line underground on Katella Avenue from west of the Union Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850 feet).  Relocate Southern California Edison communication line underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to east of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).  Relocate distribution circuits underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim Way to State College Boulevard (1,500 feet).  Relocation a distribution circuit underground on Orangewood Avenue from State College Boulevard to west of the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College Boulevard (2,500 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Lewis Street from Katella Avenue to Gene Autry Way (950 feet).  Relocate a distribution circuit underground on Douglas Street from Katella Avenue to Cerritos Avenue (1,000 feet). (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-45, Mitigation Measure No. 10-23) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-95 10-25 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities:  Two new distribution duct banks on Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to Lewis Street (800 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell Avenue (2,000 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on State College Boulevard from Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the Santa Ana River (4,800 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from Haster Street to the east side of I-5 (2,500 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College Boulevard (2,500 feet).  A new transmission duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).  A new transmission duct bank on Lewis Street and Santa Cruz Street from Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,000 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on the east side of the Angel Stadium parking lot from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57 (2,000 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue (4,000 feet). (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-46, Mitigation Measure No. 10-25) 10-26 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, the property owner/developer shall provide an electrical load analysis to the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD). The analysis shall include a load schedule and maximum electrical coincident demand. Should the property owner/developer’s load analysis result in a contributed load forecasted to exceed 20 MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the electrical system currently serving the Platinum Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction of a new electrical substation within the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees for the electrical substation will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-47, Mitigation Measure No. 10-26) ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 3-96 3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance Implementation of the proposed project does not involve any significant impacts related to aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, or utilities and service systems. No significant geologic constraints were identified, although the site will be subject to seismic ground-shaking typical of all areas of Southern California. Short-term noise and air quality impacts will be associated with grading and construction activities. These significant impacts were considered in FSEIR No. 339, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for unmitigated environmental effects, including these air quality impacts. For all other environmental impacts analyzed, feasible mitigation measures included in FSEIR No. 339 have been incorporated into the proposed project which avoid or substantially lessen potentially significant impacts to a less-than-significant level for the reasons set forth in this Initial Study/Addendum. Based on the information and environmental analysis of potential environmental impacts contained in this Initial Study/Addendum, it has been determined that none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met and, thus, the City cannot require a subsequent EIR. As described in detail herein, there are no new significant impacts resulting from the proposed modification nor is there any substantial increase in the intensity of any previously identified environmental impacts. The project impacts are not significantly increased due to implementation of the project from anticipated levels documented in the certified Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle. 3.19 Cumulative Impacts Cumulative impacts were addressed in FSEIR No. 339. As described herein, the proposed project does not result in any new significant environmental impacts which were not previously addressed in the certified Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle. As a result, no new cumulative impacts are associated with the proposed project beyond those previously identified in the certified Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 4-1 4 Organizations and Persons Consulted 4.1 City of Anaheim (Lead Agency) Planning Department  Jonathan Borrego, Principal Planner  Susan Kim, AICP, LEED AP ND, Senior Planner  Vanessa Norwood, Associate Planner Public Works Department  Keith Linker, Principal Civil Engineer  Raul Garcia, Principal Civil Engineer  Sandip Budhia, P.E., Associate Engineer, Design Services  Doug Park, Principal Transportation Planner  Taher Jalai, Principal Traffic Engineer  David Kennedy, P.E., Associate Transportation Planner 4.2 Project Applicant The Shopoff Group, L.P.  Brian G. Rupp, Director – Asset Management 4.3 Applicant’s Consultants Geology and Soils EEI  William R. Morrison, Senior Geotechnical Engineer  Jeffrey P. Blake, Senior Engineering Geologist ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 4-2 Hydrology, Water Quality, Sewer Hall & Foreman, Inc.  John C. Hogan, P.E., LEED AP, C.E.O., Principal  Gavin Powell, P.E., LEED AP, Project Manager, Associate  Edward T. Oune, P.E., Q.S.D., Project Manager Fuscoe Engineering, Inc.  Ian Adam, Principal, LEED AP, QSD, Principal, Stormwater Manager  Bob Strong, P.E., Senior Engineer Traffic LSA Associates, Inc.  Tony L. Petros, Principal  Pritam Deshmukh, Senior Transportation Engineer Kunzman Associates, Inc.  Carl Ballard, Principal, Associate 4.4 Environmental Consultant Templeton Planning Group (Consultant to the City) 20250 Acacia, Suite 260 Newport Beach, CA 92660  Peter Templeton, Principal  Vanessa Yee, Senior Project Manager ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 5-1 5 List of References 1. City of Anaheim, Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan, July 20, 1999. 2. City of Anaheim, General Plan, Revised September 15, 2011. 3. City of Anaheim, Municipal Code. 4. EEI, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Shopoff Advisors, LP, 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue, APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28, Anaheim, California 92805, February 7, 2012. 5. EEI, Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Residential Development, Platinum Gateway, East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, July 3, 2012. 6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Orange County and Incorporated Areas, Community Panel 060213, and Panel Map No. 06059C0142J, 2009. 7. Hall & Foreman, Inc., City of Anaheim, Priority Project, Preliminary On-Site Sewer System Study, Platinum Gateway, October 2012, revised November 1, 2012. 8. Hall & Foreman, Inc., City of Anaheim, Priority Project, Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Platinum Gateway, July 2012, revised September 2012. 9. Hall & Foreman, Inc., Platinum Gateway Preliminary Hydrology Report, July 2012, revised September 2012. 10. KHR Associates, Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim, California, January 31, 2008. 11. LSA Associates, Inc., Traffic Impact Analysis Update, Platinum Gateway Residential Development (805 and 917 East Katella Avenue) Anaheim, California, September 2012. 12. The Planning Center, The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339, SCH #[PHONE REDACTED], August 2010. 13. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993, updated November 1993. ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway Project 5-2 14. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Southern California Compass Growth Vision Report, June 2004. 15. State of California, Assembly Bill 32 California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_32 _bill_20060927_chaptered.pdf. September 27, 2006. 16. State of California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program Website: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2010/ora10.pdf ---PAGE BREAK--- 2195 Faraday Avenue ♦ Suite K ♦ Carlsbad, California 92008-7207 ♦ Ph: [PHONE REDACTED] ♦ Fax: [PHONE REDACTED] ♦ www.eeitiger.com PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Residential Development Platinum Gateway East Katella Avenue Anaheim, California July 3, 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Project Description 1 1.3 Scope of Services 1 2.0 BACKGROUND 2 2.1 Site Description 2 2.2 Site Topography….... 2 2.3 Geologic Setting 2 2.4 Regional Groundwater 2 3.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY 3 Table 1 – Summary of Major Active Faults 3 3.1 Seismic Parameters 4 3.2 Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture 4 3.3 4 3.4 Seismic Induced Settlement 5 4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 5 4.1 Field Exploration 5 4.2 Subsurface Conditions 6 4.3 Laboratory Testing and Classification 6 4.3.1 Moisture Content and Dry Density 6 4.3.2 Grain Size Distribution 6 4.3.3 Liquid Limits, Plastic Limits, and Plasticity Index 6 4.3.4 Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content 7 4.3.5 Direct Shear 7 4.3.6 Expansion Index 7 4.3.7 Consolidation 7 4.3.8 7 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 8 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 9 6.1 General 9 6.2 Site Preparation and Grading 9 6.3 Remedial Earthwork 10 6.4 Fill Placement 10 6.5 Shrinkage and Bulking 11 6.6 Temporary Excavation 11 7.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 11 7.1 General 12 7.2 Foundation Design – Residential Buildings 12 7.3 Foundation Design – Parking Structure 13 7.4 Settlement 13 7.5 Footing Setbacks 13 7.6 Construction 13 7.7 Concrete Slab-on-Grade 14 7.8 Retaining Walls 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 8.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 15 8.1 Rigid and Flexible Non Pervious Pavement 15 Table 2 – Preliminary Pavement Design Recommendations 16 8.2 Pervious Pavement 16 8.2.1. Recommendations for Use of Pervious Interlocking concrete Pavement Onsite 17 8.2.2. Recommendations for Use of Pervious concrete Pavement Onsite 17 9.0 DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 17 9.1 Landscape Maintenance and Planting 18 9.2 Site Drainage 18 9.3 Site Runoff Considerations-Stormwater Disposal Systems 18 9.3.1 Percolation Testing 18 Table 3 – Percolation Test Results 19 9.3.2 Stormwater Management Plan 19 9.4 Additional Site Improvements 20 9.5 20 9.6 Utility Backfill 20 10.0 PLAN REVIEW 21 11.0 LIMITATIONS 21 12.0 REFERENCES 22 FIGURES Figure 1 – Site Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Aerial Site Map Figure 3 – Boring Location Map APPENDICES Appendix A – Soil Classification Chart and Boring Logs Appendix B – Laboratory Test Data Appendix C – Liquefaction Analysis Appendix D – Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Distribution: Addressee Addressee (electronic copy) ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this evaluation was to provide geotechnical information to Shopoff Advisors LP (hereinafter referred to as “Client”), regarding the proposed residential development in Anaheim, Orange County, California. The information developed in this evaluation is intended to provide the Client and other members of the design team with an understanding of the physical conditions of site-specific subsurface soils, groundwater, and the regional geologic setting which could affect the cost or design of the proposed development (Site Vicinity Map-Figure 1, Aerial Site Map-Figure This geotechnical evaluation has been conducted in general accordance with the accepted geotechnical engineering principles and in general conformance with the approved proposal and cost estimate for the project by EEI, dated April 10, 2012. EEI conducted an onsite field exploration on May 24 and May 25, 2012 that included drilling and sampling of ten (10) hollow stem auger geotechnical borings for the proposed residential development. We conducted two percolation tests of the upper soils in conjunction with our field exploration. This geotechnical evaluation has been prepared for the sole use of Shopoff Advisors, LP. Other parties, without the express written consent of EEI and Shopoff Advisors, LP, should not rely upon this geotechnical study. 1.2 Project Description Based on our review of a conceptual site plan provided (Architects Orange, dated May 18, 2012), the proposed development is for the construction of a four-story structure to house multi-family residential apartments comprised of attached buildings that will typically house 700 to 1,400 square feet of living space that will include a total of 399 residential units, along with related improvements including an at- grade, five-level parking structure, underground utilities, public park and other associated improvements. The residential buildings are anticipated to be constructed of wood or steel frame and slab-on-grade construction. The multi-level parking structure is anticipated to be constructed of either steel frame or reinforced/pre-stressed concrete on conventional spread and isolated pad footings. No foundation plans were available at the time of our preparation of this report; however, foundation loads are anticipated to be typical for the planned construction. No grading plans are available at this time. 1.3 Scope of Services The scope of our services included: • A review of readily available data pertinent to the subject property, including published and unpublished geologic reports/maps, and soils data for the area (References). • The drilling, logging and sampling of ten (10) hollow stem auger (HSA) borings to depths on the order of 9 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface across the site. Percolation testing was conducted at two of the boring locations. The locations of each of our borings and percolation tests are presented on Figure 3 (Boring Locations and Proposed Site Map). • An evaluation of seismicity and geologic hazards that includes an evaluation of faulting and liquefaction potential. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 2 • Completion of laboratory testing of representative earth materials encountered onsite to ascertain their soils engineering properties, including corrosion potential (Appendix • The preparation of this report which presents our findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the proposed development. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Site Description The subject site parcel is situated at 905-917 East Katella Avenue, northeast of the intersection of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street in Anaheim, California. The subject property is presently occupied by an approximately 175,000 square foot industrial building that contains multiple tenants that include a medical facility along with related improvements, which will be razed prior to the proposed new construction. Current access to the site is afforded by E. Katella Avenue, which bounds the property to the south. The site is also bounded to the north generally by retail and commercial development, to the west by Lewis Street, and to the east by commercial and retail development. A site vicinity map is attached as Figure 1. The center of the property is situated at 33.8043° north latitude and 117.8968° west longitude (Google Earth®, 2011). 2.2 Site Topography The subject property is situated within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Anaheim, California 7.5 Minute Quadrangle map (USGS, 1965). A review of these topographic maps indicates that the ground surface of the subject property is approximately 145 feet above mean sea level (msl). The subject site is overall gently sloping toward the west and south. Surface water appears to drain in a southwesterly direction towards storm drain appurtenances along E. Katella Avenue. An aerial photo of site is attached as Figure 2. 2.3 Geologic Setting Regionally, the area is situated within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California (CGS, 2002). The Peninsular Ranges are essentially a series of ranges separated by northwest trending valleys, sub-parallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault system. The northern portion of this Province is bounded by the Transverse Ranges Geomorphic Province. The Peninsular Ranges extend into Lower California (and Baja), and are bound on the east by the Colorado Desert. The predominant structural feature that has affected the geologic evolution of the province is the San Andreas Fault. Regional geologic maps of the site vicinity (Morton and Miller, 1981; CDMG, 1997) indicate the property is underlain by Pleistocene to Holocene age alluvial fan deposits. The deposits are locally mantled by artificial fill materials of varying thicknesses. 2.4 Regional Groundwater Our review of literature published by the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG, 1997) indicates that the historic high groundwater in the vicinity of the site is at least 50 feet below the ground surface. Monitoring well data available on California Department of Water Resources, Water Data Library website (http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary), indicate recorded groundwater conditions at ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 3 approximately 89 to 124 feet below the grades in the general vicinity of the site. The nearest well, 04S10W26C001S, located approximately 0.23 miles west, reported a depth to groundwater at approximately 124 feet below ground surface (bgs) that was measured in 1973. Well number 04S10W23R001S, located approximately 0.34 miles northeast reported a depth to groundwater at 89.8 feet bgs that was measured in 1969. Well 04S10W25D001S, approximately 0.50 miles east, reported a depth to groundwater at 113 feet bgs that was measured in 2010. Based on information provided on the GeoTracker website the nearby Former Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) of the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street, reported depth to groundwater at approximately 80 to 100 feet below ground surface (bgs). In general, groundwater is expected to follow the direction of surface topography. Based on topography, regional groundwater flow direction can be expected to generally be in a west-southwesterly direction (USGS, 1965). Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory boring excavations performed during our study to the maximum depths explored. However, it should be noted that variations in subsurface water (including perched water zones and seepage) may result from fluctuations in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation and other factors that may not have been evident at the time of our subsurface exploration. 3.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY The portion of Southern California that includes the subject site is considered to be seismically active. Due to the proximity of the site area to several nearby active faults, strong ground shaking could occur at the site as a result of an earthquake on any one of the faults. Our review indicates that there are no known active faults crossing the site (Jennings, 1994; Jennings and Bryant, 2010) and the site is not within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997). It is our opinion, therefore, that the likelihood of surface fault rupture at the site is low. The following table provides a summary of active fault zones within an approximately 25-mile radius of the subject property that may have a considerable effect on the subject property in the event significant activity is experienced. Fault names and approximate distances are based upon information provided in applicable references (Blake, 2000; Jennings, 1994). TABLE 1 Summary of Major Active Faults Fault Name Approximate Distance From Site miles (kilometers) Maximum Moment Magnitude San Joaquin Hills 7.7 (12.4) 6.6 Puente Hills Blind Thrust 8.5 (13.7) 7.1 Whittier 8.9 (14.3) 6.8 Newport-Inglewood (L.A. Basin) 10.4 (16.8) 7.1 Chino-Central Avenue (Elsinore) 11.9 (19.1) 6.7 Newport-Inglewood (Offshore) 14.8 (23.8) 7.1 Elsinore (Glen Ivy) 15.2 (24.5) 6.8 San Jose 16.3 (26.2) 6.4 Palos Verdes 20.1 (32.4) 7.3 Upper Elysian Park Blind Thrust 21.7 (34.9) 6.4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 4 TABLE 1 Summary of Major Active Faults Fault Name Approximate Distance From Site miles (kilometers) Maximum Moment Magnitude Sierra Madre 23.1 (37.2) 7.2 Cucamonga 24.2 (38.9) 6.9 Raymond 24.9 (40.0) 6.5 3.1 Seismic Parameters Maximum considered ground motion maps provided in the California Building Code (CBC, 2010) were utilized with coordinates of 33.8043° north latitude and 117.8968° west longitude, to determine the site seismic parameters. EEI utilized seismic design criteria provided in the CBC (2010). In accordance with the guidelines of the CBC (2010), the spectral parameters for the site (based on a Site Class B soil) are estimated to be Ss = 1.366g and S1 = 0.495g. Based on the geotechnical data obtained during our subsurface exploration it is our opinion that the site can be classified as Class D per the 2010 CBC (Table 1613.5.2). Consequently, Site Coefficients Fa= 1.0 and Fv = 1.505 appear to be appropriate for the site. Based on this information, the adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response parameters SMS = 1.366g and SM1 = 0.746g are recommended for seismic design of the project. Assuming an occupancy category of II (Table 1604.5), an SDs value of 0.910g and an SD1 value of 0.497g, the proposed buildings at the site can be assigned a seismic design category of D [Table 1613.5.6 and Final selection of the appropriate seismic design coefficients should be made by the structural consultant based on the local laws and ordinances, expected building response and desired level of conservatism. Structures should be designed in accordance with seismic design criteria developed by the Structural Engineers Association of California. 3.2 Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture Based on the geography, topography and site-specific geotechnical conditions encountered during our geotechnical evaluation at the site, we consider the potential for ground lurching or shallow ground rupture at the site to be low; however, due to the active seismicity of California, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. In light of this, the unlikely hazard of lurching or ground-rupture should not preclude consideration of “flexible” design for onsite utility lines and connections. 3.3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced by earthquake shaking or other rapid loading. Liquefaction and related phenomena have been responsible for substantial structural damage in historical earthquakes, and are a design concern under certain conditions. Liquefaction occurs in saturated soils, that is - soils in which the space between individual particles is completely filled with water. This pore water exerts a pressure on the soil particles that influences how the particles themselves are pressed together. Prior to an earthquake, pore water pressure is typically low; however, earthquake motion can cause the pore water pressure to increase to the point where the soil particles can readily move with respect to each other. When liquefaction occurs; the strength of the soil decreases and the ability of a soil deposit to support structural loads are reduced. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 5 Due to the observed lack of a near surface static ground water level at the site, along with the observed nature of the encountered materials comprising the Quaternary aged Alluvium that underlies the site, it appears that liquefaction is not a significant geotechnical concern at the site. 3.4 Seismic Induced Settlement Seismically induced settlement can occur due to reorientation of soil particles during strong shaking of unsaturated sands, as well as in response to liquefaction of saturated loose granular soils. The potential seismically induced settlement within the upper alluvial soils was estimated using the LiquefyPro computer program (CivilTech, 2003), which incorporated Tokimatsu and Seed’s procedure (1987). As noted in Section 1802.7.7(2) of the CBC (2010), liquefaction and seismic settlement analyses are to be based on peak-ground accelerations determined from a site specific study; however, the CBC also indicates that a site-specific ground motion study need not be performed, provided that a peak-ground acceleration that equals SDS/2.5 is used (where SDS is the design spectral response acceleration at a short period, as determined in accordance with Chapter 21 of ASCE As indicated in Section 3.1 of this report, an SDS value of 0.910g appears to be appropriate for the project site. When dividing this SDS value by 2.5, a peak-ground acceleration of 0.364g is obtained, which is the value used in our evaluation. Deaggregation of the probabilistic ground motion at the site was performed using the USGS interactive webpage (web address which estimates the modal magnitude for a given probabilistic seismic ground motion. Results of our seismic hazard deaggregation (Appendix C) yielded a modal magnitude of 6.58, which is the magnitude used in our seismic settlement analysis. Based on our evaluation (Appendix which incorporates the geotechnical data obtained from our exploratory Boring B-1, we estimate the total seismic-induced settlement to be less than 1 inch. Differential earthquake induced settlements are estimated to be less than ½ inch across a 50-foot span. 4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 4.1 Field Exploration Field work was conducted on May 24 and May 25, 2012. A total of ten (10) hollow stem auger borings were drilled on the subject property. Percolation testing was performed in two of the exploratory borings during our field work. The borings were placed at various readily accessible locations across the subject property and were extended to a maximum depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. Our exploratory borings were logged by a representative of EEI. Blow count values were determined utilizing a 140 pound automatic hammer, falling 30-inches onto a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) split-spoon sampler and a Modified California split-tube sampler. A truck mounted Mobile-B61 drill rig was used during field work. The blows per foot (N value) required to advance the 18-inch long SPT and 12-inch long Modified California split-tube samplers was measured at various initial depths followed by 5-foot intervals, recorded on the boring logs, and are presented in Appendix A-Soil Classification Chart and Boring Logs. Relatively “undisturbed” samples were collected in a 2.42-inch (inside diameter) California Modified split-tube sampler for visual examination and laboratory testing. The soils were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM, 2008). Representative bulk samples were also collected for appropriate laboratory testing. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 6 4.2 Subsurface Conditions Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of Quaternary age alluvial fan deposits (alluvium) that extends to the maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. As encountered in our exploratory borings, the alluvial fan deposits were observed to consist of interbedded poorly graded sands and silty sands, with lesser zones of sandy silts and clayey silts. The sandy layers of the alluvium were observed to be typically dry to moist and loose to medium dense, while the sandy silt and clayey silt layers were noted to be generally moist to very moist and firm to stiff at the time of our subsurface exploration. Refusal was not encountered within any of our exploratory borings. Detailed descriptions of the encountered soils are provided on the boring logs included as Appendix A. Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory borings during our subsurface exploration. However, it should be noted that variations in groundwater (including perched water zones and seepage) may result from fluctuations in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation and other factors that may not have been evident at the time of our subsurface exploration. 4.3 Laboratory Testing and Classification Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing to check their field classification(s). Field descriptions and classifications were visually classified according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D2488 which classifies soils under the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Representative soil samples were tested in the lab for grain size distribution to determine actual classifications by ASTM D2487-Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes in accordance to the USCS. Final classifications of soils can be found on the boring logs in Appendix A and the laboratory test data in Appendix B. 4.3.1 Moisture Content and Dry Density The in-situ moisture content and dry density of soils was determined for soil samples obtained from the borings. The in-place moisture content and dry density of soils helps to determine engineering design parameters for foundations, retaining walls, and other engineering structures. Moisture content on soil samples was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D2216, and was recorded as a percentage. The in-situ moisture content and dry density for soil samples retrieved from the field can be found on the boring logs located in Appendix A. 4.3.2 Grain Size Distribution To help check field classifications of soils, the grain size distribution of representative soil samples was determined. In order to find the percentages of different sized particles in a particular soil stratum, soils were tested in general accordance to ASTM D 422-Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. Grain size distribution curves and gradation results are presented in Appendix B. 4.3.3 Liquid Limits, Plastic Limits, and Plasticity Index The liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index (PI) of soils were determined to aid in the classification of soils distinguishing clay from silt) and to help evaluate the potential for expansion and seismically-induced liquefaction. The tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D-4318. The results are presented in the Appendix B. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 7 4.3.4 Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined from bulk samples obtained from borings B3 and B9 at depths within five feet of existing grade. Our testing was performed in general accordance with ASTM D1557, Method A. Results of our testing are presented in Appendix B. 4.3.5 Direct Shear Direct shear testing was conducted on two representative samples of the upper soils that were remolded to 90 percent of their maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557) to measure their shear strength characteristics for engineering purposes. The samples were inundated for at least 18 hours prior to testing. The samples were placed in a shear box and a normal load was applied (10, 20, and 40 kilogram weights were used). The samples were then sheared at a controlled strain rate in a direct shear apparatus that measures horizontal displacement and shear resistance. Shear testing was performed in general accordance to ASTM D3080. The results of our testing are presented in Appendix B. 4.3.6 Expansion Index Two representative soil samples obtained from borings B-3 and B-9 within the upper five feet of existing grade were tested for expansion potential. Our expansion index testing was conducted in general accordance to ASTM D4829. The results of our expansion index testing are presented in Appendix B. 4.3.7 Consolidation Testing Consolidation properties of soils were determined to evaluate soil potential for compression and long-term settlement. The consolidation test method includes measuring the amount and rate of consolidation of soil when subject to loading. The test was run with a relatively undisturbed soil sample in a 1-inch thick brass ring, collected from the Modified California sampler. The sample was placed in a consolidometer with porous stones at the top and bottom of the sample and placed in a loading frame. Weights were added and measurements of height were recorded from a dial indicator as the sample was compressed. Measurements of height were also recorded during the “rebound” period of removal of the weights. Consolidation testing was performed in general accordance to ASTM D-2435. During consolidation testing, the collapse potential of soils was assessed using the single oedometer method. To measure hydrocollapse, water was added to the soil sample at a pressure that is equivalent or higher than the pressure that will likely be exerted on soils in the field. Results of our consolidation testing are presented in Appendix B. 4.3.8 Sulfate/Corrosion A representative sample of the upper onsite earth materials was collected for analysis at Clarkson Laboratory and Supply, Inc. located in Chula Vista, California for corrosion/soluble sulfate potential. This corrosion testing included soil minimum resistivity and pH by California Test 643, sulfate by California Test 417, and chloride by California Test 422. Results of these tests are presented in Appendix B. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 8 It should be understood that the results provided in Appendix B are based upon pre-development conditions. Verification testing is recommended at the conclusion of grading on samples collected at or near finish grade. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our field exploration, laboratory testing and engineering and geologic analysis, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed residential development from a geotechnical engineering and geologic viewpoint; however, there are existing geotechnical conditions associated with the property that will warrant mitigation and/or consideration during planning stages. If site plans and/or the proposed building locations are revised, additional field studies may be warranted to address proposed site-specific conditions. As a result, EEI is providing the following conclusions: • A total of ten (10) exploratory hollow stem auger (HSA) borings were advanced within the subject property during this evaluation. This total includes borings for two percolation tests that were performed in conjunction with the HSA borings. The HSA borings extended to a maximum depth of approximately 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). Overall, the subject property is underlain by Quaternary age alluvial fan deposits. The encountered materials comprising the alluvial fan deposits were observed to consist of interbedded poorly graded sands and silty sands with lesser interbeds of sandy silts and clayey silts. Refusal was not encountered in any of our exploratory borings to the total depths explored. • Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory borings to the maximum depths explored of 51.5 feet below existing grades. However, it should be noted that variations in groundwater including perched water zones and seepage may result from fluctuations in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation and other factors that may not have been evident at the time of our subsurface exploration. • Laboratory test results indicate that earth materials are moderately alkaline (pH = 8.2) and are highly corrosive to ferrous metals with a minimum resistivity value of 2,600 ohm-cm. Laboratory testing of the upper soils yielded soluble sulfate concentration of 0.003 percent, indicating a negligible corrosion potential to concrete. Chloride concentration within the tested sample was reported to be 0.002 percent, indicating that the upper soils possess a low potential for corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. Since EEI does not practice corrosion engineering, we recommend that a qualified corrosion consultant be retained to further evaluate the corrosion potential of the upper soils with respect to metallic conduits, and to provide appropriate recommendations to mitigate the effects of corrosive soils, as warranted. • The subject property is located within an area of southern California recognized as having a number of active and potentially-active faults located nearby. Our review indicates that there are no known active faults mapped as crossing the site and the site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Zone. The nearest active faults that could affect the subject site include the San Joaquin Hills Fault, located approximately 8 miles from the site, the Puente Hills Blind Thrust, located approximately 9 miles from the site, the Whittier fault, located approximately 9 miles from the site, and the Los Angeles Basin segment of the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone, located approximately 10 miles from the site. Other nearby seismic sources includes the Chino-Central Avenue segment of the Elsinore Fault Zone and the offshore segment of the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone. Each of these active faults is capable of generating severe ground shaking at the site. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 9 • Based on EEI’s geotechnical evaluation, earth materials underlying the site of the proposed residential development are not considered susceptible to liquefaction or significant amounts of seismic settlement. • Results of our Expansion Index laboratory testing of the upper soils indicate a very low expansion potential. • A conventional shallow foundation system appears to be suitable for use to support the structures proposed for residential development, provided the property is graded and improved in general conformance with recommendations presented herein, as well as the California Building Code (CBC, 2010), the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange grading ordinances. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations presented herein should be incorporated into the planning and design phases of development. Guidelines for site preparation, earthwork, and onsite improvements are provided in the following sections. 6.1 General Grading should conform to the guidelines presented in the California Building Code, 2010 (CBC, 2010) and the grading ordinances of the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange. Additionally, general Earthwork and Grading Guidelines are provided herein as Appendix D. During earthwork construction, removals, excavations, as well as general grading procedures of the contractor should be observed and the fill placed selectively tested by representatives of the geotechnical engineer, EEI. If any unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by the geotechnical engineer and if warranted, modified and/or additional remedial recommendations will be offered. Specific guidelines and comments pertinent to the planned development are provided herein. The recommendations presented herein have been completed using the information provided to us regarding site development. If information concerning the proposed development is revised, or any changes in the design and location of the proposed property improvements are made, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should not be considered applicable unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by this office. 6.2 Site Preparation and Grading Debris and other deleterious material, such as organic soils and/or environmentally impacted earth materials, should be removed from the site prior to the start of grading. Areas to receive fill should be properly benched in accordance with current industry standards of practice and guidelines specified in the CBC (2010). Existing utilities should be removed within the proposed building envelope. Abandoned trenches should be properly backfilled and tested. If unanticipated subsurface improvements (utility lines, septic systems, wells, utilities, etc.) are encountered during earthwork construction, the geotechnical engineer should be informed and appropriate remedial recommendations would then be provided. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 10 6.3 Remedial Earthwork Alluvial materials were encountered underlying the site to the maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet in each of our exploratory borings. The upper portions of the alluvium were observed to be somewhat dry and loose and variable in relative density in our exploratory borings. Consequently, these materials are considered to be potentially compressible and are considered unsuitable for the support of the proposed building loads and additional fill loads in their current condition. Therefore, where they are not already removed by the proposed site grading, the upper soils should be over-excavated and recompacted in the areas proposed for construction, in order to reduce the potential for settlement and to provide relatively uniform soil bearing conditions for the proposed building areas. We recommend that these upper soils be removed to a depth of at least 5 feet below existing site grades, or a minimum of 36-inches below the bottom of the proposed foundations (whichever is deeper) and replaced with compacted fill. Within the areas where the residential structures are proposed, we also recommend that the upper soils be removed to a depth of at least 36-inches below the bottom of the proposed foundation for the parking structure and replaced with compacted fill. Following removal of the upper soils, the bottom of the resulting excavation(s) should be observed by a representative of EEI to check that unsuitable materials have been sufficiently removed. It should be understood that based on the observations of our field representative, localized deeper removals may be recommended. Some areas may encounter thicker zones of topsoil, fill or slopewash based on actual field conditions encountered during earthwork. The base of the removal areas should be level to avoid differential fill thicknesses under proposed improvements. This remedial earthwork should extend at least five feet outside the proposed building limits and/or five feet beyond the area to receive fill. Note that vertical sides exceeding five feet in depth may be prone to sloughing and may require laying back to an inclination of 1:1 (horizontal to vertical). After removal of the upper soils and observation of the excavation bottoms, the over-excavated areas should be scarified to a minimum depth of 8-inches, moisture conditioned as needed to achieve at least optimum moisture content and re-compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557). The over-excavated areas should then be backfilled with onsite and/or imported soils that are placed and compacted as recommended herein until design finish grades are reached. 6.4 Fill Placement Fill material should possess an expansion index of less than 20 (as determined by ASTM D4829) and be free of organic matter (less than three percent organics by weight) and other deleterious material. Much of the onsite materials appear to be suitable for re-use as fill, provided they do not contain rocks greater than six-inches in maximum dimension, organic debris and other deleterious materials. Rock fragments exceeding six-inches in one dimension should be segregated and exported from the site, properly placed in deeper fill areas or utilized for landscaping. If import soils are needed, the earthwork contractor should ensure that all proposed fill materials are approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. Representative soil samples should be made available for testing at least ten working days prior to hauling to the site to allow for laboratory tests. Fill materials should be placed in 6- to 8-inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned as necessary to at least optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent maximum dry density according to ASTM D1557. The upper 12-inches of pavement subgrade should be moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 11 D1557. Suitable heavy grading equipment should be utilized to properly mix, spread, moisture condition or dry, and compact each fill lift. Earthwork may be affected by the existing soil moisture content exceeding optimum. Moist to very moist earth materials may be difficult to mix and compact in their native condition, and drying or mixing with drier soils may be warranted to achieve the recommended relative compaction. Those areas to receive fill (including over-excavated areas) or surface improvements should be scarified at least 8-inches, moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557). 6.5 Shrinkage and Bulking Several factors will impact earthwork balancing on the site, including shrinkage, bulking, subsidence, trench spoils from utilities and footing excavations, and final pavement section thickness as well as the accuracy of topography. Shrinkage, bulking and subsidence are primarily dependent upon the degree of compactive effort achieved during construction. For planning purposes, the shrinkage factor is estimated to be on the order of 10 to 15 percent for the existing fill materials to be re-utilized as engineered fill. These shrinkage factors may vary with methods employed by the contractor. Subsidence is estimated to be on the order of 0.1 feet. Losses from site clearing and removal of existing site improvements may affect earthwork quantity calculation and should be considered. The previous estimates are intended as an aid for the project engineers in estimating earthwork quantities. It is recommended that the site development be planned to include an area that could be raised or lowered to accommodate final site balancing. 6.6 Temporary Excavations Temporary excavations or backcuts within the onsite materials should be stable at 1.1H:1V inclination for short durations during construction but should not exceed 10 feet in height. All temporary excavations should be constructed in accordance with OSHA guidelines and local safety codes. 7.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS As noted above, the encountered alluvial soils were generally observed to be relatively loose and potentially compressible. While removal and recompaction of the upper soils as described above in Section 6.3 of this report can be expected to mitigate the settlement of the more loaded structures proposed for the site (such as the residential buildings proposed for the site), our geotechnical analyses and experience indicate that the more heavily loaded parking structures (which can often impose column loads on the order of 600 kips to 800 kips) could experience considerable settlements if they are supported on conventional shallow foundations bearing upon the onsite materials. A number of different options are available to provide adequate support for the propose parking structure, while mitigating the potential for settlement of the upper soils. After conferring with Shopoff Advisors and members of the design team, we are providing herein recommendations for a conventional shallow foundation system to support the proposed residential buildings and a reinforced mat foundation system for the support of the proposed parking structure. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 12 Other measures to reduce the potential for settlement and to improve the bearing characteristics of the upper soils are available and we would be pleased to provide the alternative recommendations upon request. Be advised that as part of the foundation design election process, there is always a cost/benefit evaluation. Although we are providing recommendations for foundation design we have not accomplished the cost/benefit evaluation. 7.1 General In the event that plans concerning the proposed four-story building structures and five-level parking structure are revised in the project design and/or location or loading conditions of the planned structures are made, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should not be considered valid unless they are reviewed, revised and/or approved in writing by EEI. The foundation recommendations provided herein are based on the soil materials near finish grade possessing a very low expansion potential (Expansion Index < 21). Recommendations by the project's design-structural engineer or architect may exceed the following minimum recommendations. Final foundation and slab design should be provided based on the expansion potential of the near surface soils encountered during grading. 7.2 Foundation Design – Residential Buildings The proposed residential structures can be supported on conventional continuous or isolated spread footings bearing entirely upon at least 36-inches of properly compacted fill materials. Foundations supporting the four story residential structures should be constructed with an embedment of at least 24- inches below finish grade. At these depths, footings may be designed for an allowable soil bearing value of 3,500 psf. This value may be increased by one-third for loads of short duration, such as wind and seismic forces. Continuous footings supporting four-story structures should have minimum width of 18- inches. We recommend a minimum width of 24-inches for isolated spread footings. Based on geotechnical considerations, continuous footings should be provided with reinforcement consisting of two No. 4 rebars, one top and one bottom; however, the actual foundation reinforcement should be in accordance with the structural engineer’s requirements. In order to help reduce the potential for misalignment of proposed garage door openings, we recommend a grade beam be provided at each garage door opening. This grade beam should be designed in accordance with the structural engineer’s requirements and have a minimum reinforcement of two No. 4 rebar (one top and one bottom). Horizontal loads acting on foundations and stem walls cast in open excavations against undisturbed native soil or against properly placed and compacted fill will be resisted by friction acting along the base of the footing and by passive earth pressures against the side of the footing and stem wall. The frictional resistance acting along the base of footings founded on suitable foundation soils may be computed using a coefficient of friction equal to 0.35 with the normal dead load. Passive earth pressures acting against the side of footings and stem walls may be assumed to be equivalent to a fluid weighing 350 pounds per cubic foot. Passive pressure in the upper 1.0-foot should be neglected unless confined by concrete slabs- on-grade or asphaltic pavement. The values given above may be increased by one-third for transient wind or seismic loads. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 13 7.3 Foundation Design – Parking Structure As noted above, a rigid mat foundation can be used for the support of the proposed parking structure at the site, provided the mat foundation is bearing upon at least 3 feet of fill soils that are properly placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations contained herein. When properly designed and constructed, a structural mat foundation system can be expected to support high structural loads and provide relatively uniform settlement across a structure. Mat foundations should be properly reinforced to form a relatively rigid structural unit in accordance with the structural engineer’s design. For designing a mat foundation, we recommend using an uncorrected modulus of subgrade reaction of 225 pounds per cubic inch (pci). For large foundations, the modulus is typically reduced by 75 percent to 56 pci). The mat foundation may also be designed for a maximum bearing pressure of 1,500 psf with a one third increase for transient loadings. Mat foundations should be reinforced in accordance with structural considerations. 7.4 Settlement EEI estimates total static settlement of each foundation system as recommended above to be less than 1 inch. Differential settlement is estimated to be approximately ½-inch or less between structural elements. 7.5 Footing Setbacks All footings should maintain a minimum seven-foot horizontal setback from the base of the footing to any descending slope. This distance is measured from the outside footing face at the bearing elevation. Footings should maintain a minimum horizontal setback of H/3 (H=slope height) from the base of the footing to the descending slope face. This setback distance should not be less than seven feet and need not be greater than 40 feet. Footings adjacent to drainage swales, underground utilities (if any) or within 10 feet of stormwater devices should be deepened to a minimum of 6-inches below the invert of the adjacent unlined swale or utilities. Footings near planned stormwater devices (bioswales) that are lined may be deepened to a maximum of 30-inches. This distance is measured from the footing face at the bearing elevation. Footings for structures adjacent to retaining walls should be deepened so as to extend below a 1:1 projection from the heel of the wall. Alternatively, walls may be designed to accommodate structural loads from buildings or appurtenances as described in the retaining wall section of this report. 7.6 Construction The following foundation construction considerations are presented as minimum recommendations from a soils engineering standpoint. Laboratory test results indicate the onsite soils swell (expansion) potential is very low. During grading of the site, we recommend that no potentially expansive soils material possessing an Expansion Index > 20) be placed within 24-inches of finish grade, if possible. Design parameters provided herein, however, assume that finish grade soil materials will have a very low expansion potential. Recommendations by the project's design-structural engineer or architect, which may exceed the soils engineer's recommendations, should take precedence over the following minimum considerations. Final foundation design should be provided based on the expansion potential of the near surface soils encountered during grading. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 14 7.7 Concrete Slab-on-Grade Concrete slabs-on-grade for the proposed residential structures should be a minimum of 4-inches in thickness. Floor slabs should be suitably reinforced and jointed (in accordance with Structural Engineer's recommendations) so that a small amount of independent movement can occur without causing damage. Based on the encountered geotechnical conditions, we recommend that floor slabs be reinforced with No. 3 bars spaced on 18-inch centers (each way). The contractor should take the appropriate precautions to make sure that the reinforcement is placed and maintained within the middle one-third of the slab. Control joints should be provided to help reduce the potential for random cracking. Slabs should be underlain by a 4-inch thick capillary break layer consisting of clean sand (Sand Equivalent of at least 30) or rounded fine gravel (pea gravel). Where moisture condensation is undesirable, we recommend that the architect and/or structural engineer follow the guidelines of ACI 302.2R-06 for the design of measures for under slab moisture protection and the development of appropriate specifications. To reduce the potential for buildup of hydrostatic pressures, the free draining material under the slabs should have positive drainage with no low lying areas depressions) created. It should be noted that the above recommendation is based on soil support characteristics only. The structural engineer should design the actual slab and beam reinforcement based on actual loading conditions and possible concrete shrinkage. Exterior slabs, such as walkways and driveways, can be adequately grade supported on firm natural materials alluvium) or documented structural fill, being a minimum of 12-inches in thickness, which is placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations contained herein. In preparation for slab or flatwork construction, the earthwork contractor should ensure that the onsite soils have been prepared as recommended and that field density tests have been performed to adequately document the relative compaction of the structural fill. Preparation of the native soils should be documented prior to placement of aggregate, structural components and/or fill. Some minor cracking of slabs can be expected due to shrinkage. The potential for this slab cracking can be reduced by careful control of water/cement ratios in the concrete. The contractor should take appropriate curing precautions during the pouring of concrete in hot or windy weather to reduce the potential for cracking of slabs. We recommend that a slipsheet (or equivalent) be utilized if grouted fill, tile, or other crack-sensitive floor covering is planned directly on concrete slabs. All slabs should be designed in accordance with structural considerations. All dedicated exterior flatwork should conform to standards provided by the governing agency including section composition, supporting material thickness and any requirements for reinforcing steel. Concrete mix proportions and construction techniques, including the addition of water and improper curing, can adversely affect the finished quality of the concrete and result in cracking and spalling of the slab. We recommend that all placement and curing be performed in accordance with procedures outlined by the American Concrete Institute and/or Portland Cement Association. Special consideration should be given to concrete placed and cured during hot or cold weather conditions. Proper control joints should be provided to reduce the potential for damage resulting from shrinkage. As discussed above, laboratory testing of the upper soils yielded a soluble sulfate concentration of 0.003 percent, indicating a negligible corrosion potential to concrete. Chloride concentration of the tested sample was reported at 0.002 percent, indicating that the upper soils possess a low potential for corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. As such, Type II cement can be used in concrete elements that will be in contact with the upper soils. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 15 7.8 Retaining Walls The design parameters provided below assume that non-expansive select material (such as gravel wrapped in filter fabric) is used to backfill any retaining walls. If expansive soils are used to backfill the proposed walls, increased active and at-rest earth pressures will need to be utilized for retaining wall design, and can be provided upon request. Building walls below grade should be waterproofed or damp- proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. The foundation system for retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the preceding sections of this report, as appropriate. Footings should be embedded a minimum of 18-inches below adjacent finish grade (excluding 6-inch landscape layer), and should be designed based on an allowable soil bearing value of 2,500 psf. This can be increased by one-third for loads of short duration, including wind and seismic forces. There should be no increase in bearing for footing width. The design active earth pressure on a retaining wall may be considered equivalent to that produced by a fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This design equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf is considered appropriate for cantilevered walls retaining non-expansive soils with a level ground surface, subject to lateral deflection at distances above grade due to lateral earth pressures. A safety factor for sliding and overturning of 1.5 is typically prescribed for a cantilevered structure as described. All retaining structures should be fully free draining. Restrained walls (such as basement walls or re-entrant corners), with a level backfill, should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf for at rest lateral earth pressure. For resistance to lateral loads, an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 between the base of the foundation elements and underlying material is recommended. In addition, an allowable passive resistance equal to an equivalent fluid weighing 350 pcf acting against the foundation may be used to resist lateral forces. Passive pressure in the upper 1.0-foot should be neglected unless confined by concrete slabs-on-grade or asphaltic pavement. These values may be increased by one-third for transient wind or seismic loads. Adequate subdrainage should be provided behind all retaining walls. The subdrainage system should consist of a minimum of a four-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe (schedule 40 or approved equivalent) placed at the base of the retaining wall and surrounded by 3/4-inch clean crushed rock wrapped in a Mirafi 140N filter fabric (or approved equivalent). The crushed rock wrapped in fabric should be at least 12-inches wide and extend from the base of the wall to within two feet of the ground surface. The upper two feet of backfill should consist of compacted native soil. The retaining wall drainage system should be sloped to an outlet into the storm drain system or other appropriate facility. If proposed, geotechnical design parameters can be provided for reinforced or MSE type walls Keystone, Loffel, Geogrid, etc.). 8.0 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Rigid and Flexible Non Pervious Pavement Deleterious material, excessively wet or dry pockets, concentrated zones of oversized rock fragments, and any other unsuitable yielding materials encountered during grading should be removed. Once compacted fill and/or native soils are brought to the proposed pavement subgrade elevations, the subgrade should be proof-rolled in order to check for a uniform firm and unyielding surface. Representatives of the project geotechnical engineer should observe all grading and fill placement. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 16 The upper 12-inches of pavement subgrade soils should be scarified; moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM D1557). If loose or yielding materials are encountered during subgrade preparation, evaluation should be performed by EEI. Aggregate base materials should be properly prepared processed and moisture conditioned) and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557. Aggregate base should conform to Caltrans specifications for Class 2 aggregate base. All pavement section changes should be properly transitioned. Although not anticipated, if adverse conditions are encountered during the preparation of subgrade materials, special construction methods may need to be employed. A representative of the project geotechnical engineer should be present for the preparation of subgrade and aggregate base. For design purposes we have assumed a Traffic Index (TI) of 5.0 for the proposed interior drive areas at the site. This assumed TI should be verified as necessary by the Civil Engineer or Traffic Engineer. Based on the results of our laboratory testing of representative samples of the upper soils, along with our experience with similar soils in the general vicinity of the subject site, we have utilized an R-Value of 30 for the pavement subgrade during our calculations of pavement structural sections. The modulus of subgrade reaction (K-Value) was estimated at 90 pounds per square inch per inch (psi/in) for an R-Value of 30 (Caltrans, 1974). Flexible pavement design was calculated for the parking areas and drive areas based on structural section requirements for asphaltic concrete in accordance with the guidelines presented in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. Rigid pavement was evaluated in accordance with ACI 330R-08, based on average daily truck traffic value of 25. TABLE 2 Preliminary Pavement Design Recommendations Traffic Index (TI) Pavement Surface Aggregate Base Material 5.0 3.0-inches Asphalt Concrete 5.5-inches Trash Area and Concrete Pavement 6.0-inches Portland Cement Concrete Optional R-Value of 78 for Caltrans Class II aggregate base Reinforcement and control joints placed in accordance with the structural engineer’s requirements The recommended pavement sections provided above are intended as a minimum guideline. If thinner or highly variable pavement sections are constructed, increased maintenance and repair could be expected. If the ADT (average daily traffic) or ADTT (average daily truck traffic) increases beyond that intended, as reflected by the assumed and provided traffic indices used for design, increased maintenance and repair could be required for the pavement section. Final pavement design should be verified by testing of soils exposed at subgrade after grading has been completed. If the upper three feet of soils are impacted, EEI may be able to provide a thinner pavement section, assuming soils will have a higher R-Value. 8.2 Pervious Pavement We understand that the use of a permeable interlocking concrete paving system (permeable pavers) as a method to intercept, store and provide onsite disposal of stormwater runoff is being considered. The following sections provide recommendations for both interlocking concrete pavements and pervious concrete. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 17 8.2.1 Recommendations for Use of Pervious Interlocking Concrete Pavement Onsite Our review of literature prepared by Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI, 2006) and other entities indicates that pervious interlocking concrete pavements are generally installed within areas subject to low volume traffic and pedestrian areas of a site. In light of this, along with the information described above, we recommend the use of the pervious interlocking paver system be limited to the low volume traffic areas, where lower vehicular loads would be exerted. Based on design guidelines for pavement structural sections recommended by the ICPI, a typical minimum pervious interlocking paver section for the proposed pavement section would consist of 3-1/8-inch thick concrete pavers, over a 1-7/8-inch thick bedding course of No. 8 sand, over a minimum 4-inch thick base layer consisting of No. 57 gravel, over a minimum 8-inch thick layer of No. 2 stone, on compacted subgrade soils. The thicknesses of the base and subbase layers can be increased as warranted to accommodate the required storage capacity, as determined by the civil engineer. Other considerations that can affect the long term performance of the pervious interlocking concrete paver system in both the low traffic volume and main drive/entry areas include the proper placement and compaction of the No. 2 rock and aggregate base layers, the placement of the pavers in accordance with industry guidelines and the placement of adequate edge constraints for the pavers as per the guidelines of the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute. The recommended pavement sections provided above are intended as a minimum guideline. If thinner or highly variable pavement sections are constructed, increased maintenance and repair could be expected. If the ADT (average daily traffic) or ADTT (average daily truck traffic) increases beyond that intended, as reflected by the assumed and provided traffic index used for design, increased maintenance and repair could be required for the pavement section. Final pavement design should be checked by testing of soils exposed at subgrade after grading has been completed. 8.2.2 Recommendations for Use of Pervious Concrete Pavement Onsite We understand that pervious concrete is currently being considered for use within the pavement areas at the site. Based on the geotechnical conditions encountered, we recommend that the pervious concrete be constructed in accordance with manufacturer’s guidelines and specifications with a thickness of at least 6-inches. The placement of at least 4 inches of ASTM No. 57 rock over at least 8-inches of ASTM No. 2 rock beneath the pervious concrete/grasscrete is anticipated to provide adequate support of vehicular loads. The actual thickness of these underlayment materials should be determined based on the storage capacity required for collected storm water from a design precipitation event. 9.0 DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1 Landscape Maintenance and Planting Water is known to decrease the physical strength of earth materials, significantly reducing stability by high moisture conditions. Surface drainage away from foundations and graded slopes should be maintained. Only the volume and frequency of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be applied. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 18 Consideration should be given to selecting lightweight, deep rooted types of landscape vegetation which require low irrigation that are capable of surviving the local climate. From a soils engineering viewpoint, “leaching” of the onsite soils is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If landscape soils are processed for the addition of amendments, the processed soils should be re-compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557). 9.2 Site Drainage Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled over slopes or the subject parcel. Runoff should be channeled away from slopes and structures and not allowed to pond and/or seep uncontrolled into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward an acceptable outlet. Although not required, roof gutters and down spouts may be considered to control roof drainage, discharging a minimum of ten feet from the proposed structures, or into a subsurface drainage system. Consideration should be given to eliminating open bottom planters directly adjacent to proposed structures for a minimum distance of ten feet. As an alternative, closed-bottom type planters could be utilized, with a properly designed drain outlet placed in the bottom of the planter. 9.3 Site Runoff Considerations-Stormwater Disposal Systems It is EEI understanding that current plans call for runoff generated from the development to be disposed of in engineered subsurface facilities onsite. We understand that design for such devices including bioretention facilities are based on direct infiltration into the underlying earth materials. 9.3.1 Percolation Testing During our subsurface exploration at the site, EEI conducted percolation testing in our exploratory borings B-1 and B-2 which were drilled in readily accessible locations, or as close as practical to some of the areas proposed for stormwater facilities on the site. Our testing was performed at approximate depths of 7.5 feet and 10 feet below the existing ground surface. A minimum 2-inch layer of ½-inch diameter crushed gravel was placed at the bottom of the excavation prior to testing. The approximate locations of our boring/percolation tests are provided on Figure 3. Percolation testing was conducted by one of EEI’s field personnel under the guidance of a California licensed engineering geologist and civil engineer with EEI. Percolation tests were performed in two of the exploratory borings in general accordance with the County of Orange procedures for percolation testing (which is based on procedures established by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health). Results of the percolation tests are presented herein. The locations of the exploratory trenches/percolation tests are presented on the Boring Location Map - Figure 3. Percolation test locations were pre-soaked by pouring at least 12-inches of water into the excavation. Each of the two percolation test holes conformed to the “sandy soil” test, where two consecutive readings show that at least 6 inches of water seeps away in less than 25 minutes. Consequently, each test was run for approximately one hour, with readings generally taken at approximately 10 minute intervals. The reading obtained from the final 10 minute interval was used to calculate the percolation rate for that test hole. Upon conclusion of testing, the test excavation was backfilled. Results of percolation testing are presented in the following table, Table 3. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 19 We note that a soil profile’s percolation rate is not the same as its infiltration rate. Therefore, the measured/calculated percolation rate was converted to an estimated infiltration rate utilizing the Porchet Method (Ritzema, 1994). The following table presents the calculated percolation rates and corresponding infiltration rates for each of the two test holes. TABLE 3 Summary of Percolation Testing and Estimated Infiltration Rates Location and depth (feet below existing grade) Measured Percolation Rate (min/in) Estimated Infiltration Rate (in/hr) P1, @10’ 0.39 6.2 P2, @7.5’ 1.14 2.8 Based on the results of our percolation study, we recommend that design of the proposed retention basin incorporate a maximum infiltration rate of 3.0 inches per hour. The design of the retention basin should be in accordance with County of Orange guidelines and should utilize an appropriate factor of safety. It is recommended that retention/disposal devices be situated at least three times their depth, or a minimum of 10 feet (whichever is greater), from the outside bottom edge of structural foundations. Structural foundations include (but are not limited to) buildings, loading docks, retaining walls, and screen walls. 9.3.2 Stormwater Management Plan If a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) for the site will be required by the City of Anaheim, the following items are considerations that should be incorporated into the SWMP: • During and following and grading at the site, the contractor should incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practice (BMP) devices to reduce the potential for erosion and sediment transport as low as practical. Such devices can include (but are not necessarily limited to) the placement of sand bags, straw bales, geotextiles, fiber rolls and check dams in graded areas that may be subject to erosion and/or sediment transport. Measures to mitigate the potential for post-construction erosion at the site are presented in Section 9.1 and 9.2 of this report. • As noted above, our subsurface exploration encountered materials comprising Quaternary age alluvium. No groundwater was encountered in any of our exploratory borings. Soil in the vicinity of the site is identified by the United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service as The Metz series consists of very deep, somewhat excessively drained soils that formed in alluvial material from mixed, but dominantly sedimentary rocks. Metz soils are on floodplains and alluvial fans and have slopes of 0 to 15 percent. These soils are somewhat excessively drained; have negligible to low runoff; and moderately rapid permeability. Our review of the United States Department of Agriculture’s soil survey for Orange County (USDA, 1978) indicates that the soil in the vicinity of the site is referred to as ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 20 the loamy sand of the Metz Series (USDA, 1978). According to the USDA’s Soil Survey (1978), the loamy sand of the Metz Series exhibits a moderately low to high permeability, which is on the order of 0.14 to 1.98 inches per hour. Consequently, it appears that these materials can be expected to adequately accommodate infiltration devices. • It appears that the use of Low Impact Development (LID) site design BMPs can be utilized to reduce the potential for pollutants entering the storm drainage system. Such BMPs can include (but are not necessarily limited to) the utilization of pervious sidewalks, pavements and flatwork in areas where pedestrian or light duty traffic is planned, utilizing roof gutters and downspouts to direct roof runoff into landscaped areas as opposed to directing the runoff onto impermeable surfaces, direct runoff from sidewalks and roads toward landscaped areas where practical and utilize drought tolerant vegetation in landscaped areas if practical. • All stormwater disposal systems, including pervious pavement areas should be checked and maintained on regular intervals. • Stormwater devices including bioswales that are located closer than 10 feet from any foundations/footings should be lined with an impermeable membrane to reduce the potential for saturation of foundation soils (also refer to Section 7.3). 9.4 Additional Site Improvements Recommendations for additional grading, exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be provided upon request. If in the future, additional property improvements were planned for the site, recommendations concerning the design and construction of improvements would be provided upon request. 9.5 Trenching All temporary excavations for grading purposes and installation of underground utilities should be constructed in accordance with OSHA guidelines and local safety codes. Temporary excavations over five feet in height should be evaluated by the project engineer, and could require shoring, sloping, or a combination thereof. Temporary excavations within the onsite materials should be stable at 1:1 inclinations for cuts less than 10 feet in height. Footing trench excavations for structures and walls should be observed and approved by a representative of the project soils engineer prior to placing reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent (based on ASTM D1557) if not removed from the site. All excavations should conform to OSHA and local safety codes. 9.6 Utility Backfill Fill around the pipe should be placed in accordance with details shown on the drawings, and should be placed in layers not to exceed 8-inches loose (unless otherwise approved by the geotechnical engineer) and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor). The geotechnical engineer should approve all backfill material. Select material should be used when called for on the drawings, or when recommended by the geotechnical engineer. Care should be taken during backfill and compaction operations to maintain alignment and ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 21 prevent damage to the joints. The backfill should be kept free from stones, chunks of highly plastic clay, or other objectionable material. Backfill soils should be non-expansive, non-corrosive, and compatible with native earth materials. Backfill materials and testing should be in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC, 2010) and the grading ordinances of the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange. Pipe backfill areas should be graded and maintained in such a condition that erosion or saturation will not damage the pipe bed or backfill. Flooding trench backfill is not recommended. Heavy equipment should not be operated over any pipe until it has been properly backfilled with a minimum two to three feet of cover. The utility trench should be systematically backfilled to allow maximum time for natural settlement. Backfill should not occur over porous, wet, or spongy subgrade surfaces. Should these conditions exist, the areas should be removed, replaced and recompacted. 10.0 PLAN REVIEW Once detailed site and grading plans are available, they should be submitted to this office for review and comment, to reduce the potential for discrepancies between plans and recommendations presented herein. If conditions were found to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be provided. Additional field studies may be warranted. 11.0 LIMITATIONS This geotechnical evaluation has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. Findings provided herein have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. This report has been prepared for the sole use of Shopoff Advisors, LP (Client), within a reasonable time from its authorization. Site conditions, land use (both onsite and offsite), or other factors may change as a result of manmade influences, and additional work may be required with the passage of time. This evaluation should not be relied upon by other parties without the express written consent of EEI and the Client; therefore, any use or reliance upon this geotechnical evaluation by a party other than the Client should be solely at the risk of such third party and without legal recourse against EEI, its employees, officers, or directors, regardless of whether the action in which recovery of damages is brought or based upon contract, tort, statue, or otherwise. The Client has the responsibility to see that all parties to the project, including the designer, contractor, subcontractor, and building official, etc. are aware of this report in its complete form. This report contains information that may be used in the preparation of contract specifications; however, the report is not designed as a specification document, and may not contain sufficient information for use without additional assessment. EEI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others. In addition, this report may be subject to review by the controlling authorities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 22 12.0 REFERENCES American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2005, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE Document ASCE/SEI 7-05. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2008, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.08, Construction: Soil and Rock Standards D 420 - D 5876. Anaheim, City of, Anaheim General Plan, Safety Element, pp. S-1 through S-34. Blake, 2000, “EQFAULT, version 3.0”, a Computer Program for Probabilistic Estimation of Peak Acceleration from 3-D Fault Sources,” Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and Software, Newbury Park, California. California Building Code (CBC), 2010, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, California Building Standards Commission, Based on 2009 International Building Code; 2010 California Historical Building Code, Title 24, Part 8; and 2010 California Existing Building Code, Title 24, Part 10, effective January 1. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 1974, Highway Design Manual, dated October 1, 1974. California Department of Water Resources, Water Data Library (WDL), Website (http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary), accessed May 2012. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1997, (revised 2001), Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach7.5-Minute Quadrangles, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03, 50p. (plus plates). California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1998, State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, Anaheim Quadrangle, Scale 1:24,000, Liquefaction Zones Released 1997, Landslide Zones Released 1998. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 2000, California Department of Conservation, Digital Images of Official Maps of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones of California, Southern Region, DMG CD 2000-003. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 2008, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, Special Publication 117, adopted March 13, 1997, revised and re-adopted September 11, 2008. California Geological Survey (CGS), 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces Note 36, Electronic Copy, Revised December 2002. CivilTech Software (CivilTech), 2003, LiquefyPro: Liquefaction and Settlement Analysis, Version 5 and Later, dated February 3. DeLORME, 1999, 3-D TopoQuads, California South, Region 7. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 23 Google Earth®, 2011, Version 6.0. Hart, E.W., and Bryant, W.A. (Hart and Bryant), 1997, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI), 2006, Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements, Third Edition, 48p. Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas: California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet No. 6, scale 1:750,000. Jennings, C.W. and Bryant, W.A., 2010, Fault Activity Map of California, California Geological Survey (CGS), California Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 6. Morton, P.K. and Miller, R.V., 1981, Geologic Map of Orange County, California Showing Mines and Mineral Deposits, California division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 204, Plate 1, Scale 1:48,000. Ritzema, H.P., 1994, Drainage Principles and Applications, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Publication 16, 2nd Revised Edition, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Sowers and Sowers, 1970, Unified Soil Classification System (After U. S. Waterways Experiment Station and ASTM 02487-667) in Introductory Soil Mechanics, New York. State Water Resources Control Board, Website, GeoTracker database accessed January 2012. Tokimatsu, K. and Seed, H.B., 1997, “Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking,” American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8, pp. 861-878. United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service (USDA), 1978, Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, California. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1965, USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map, Anaheim Quadrangle, California-Orange County, scale 1:24,000. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2002, Earthquake Hazards Program, Interpolated Probalistic Ground Motion for the Conterminous 48 States, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/design/. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 FIGURES ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 APPENDIX A SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND BORING LOGS ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST DATA ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 APPENDIX C LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4 APPENDIX D EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES ---PAGE BREAK--- 2195 Faraday Avenue • Suite K • Carlsbad, California 92008-7207 • Ph: [PHONE REDACTED] • Fax: [PHONE REDACTED] • www.eeitiger.com EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES GENERAL These guidelines present general procedures and recommendations for earthwork and grading as required on the approved grading plans, including preparation of areas to be filled, placement of fill and installation of subdrains and excavations. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical report are applicable to each specific project, are part of the earthwork and grading guidelines and would supersede the provisions contained hereafter in the case of conflict. Observations and/or testing performed by the consultant during the course of grading may result in revised recommendations which could supersede these guidelines or the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. Figures A through O are provided at the back of this appendix, exhibiting generalized cross sections relating to these guidelines. The contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthworks in accordance with provisions of the project plans and specifications. The project soil engineer and engineering geologist (geotechnical consultant) or their representatives should provide observation and testing services, and geotechnical consultation throughout the duration of the project. EARTHWORK OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING Geotechnical Consultant Prior to the commencement of grading, a qualified geotechnical consultant (a soil engineer and engineering geologist) should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, the approved grading plans, and applicable grading codes and ordinances. The geotechnical consultant should provide testing and observation so that determination may be made that the work is being completed as specified. It is the responsibility of the contractor to assist the consultant and keep them aware of work schedules and predicted changes, so that the consultant may schedule their personnel accordingly. All removals, prepared ground to receive fill, key excavations, and subdrains should be observed and documented by the project engineering geologist and/or soil engineer prior to placing any fill. It is the contractor’s responsibility to notify the engineering geologist and soil engineer when such areas are ready for observation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Earthwork and Grading Guidelines 2 Laboratory and Field Tests Maximum dry density tests to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with American Standard Testing Materials test method ASTM designation D-1557- 78. Random field compaction tests should be performed in accordance with test method ASTM designations D-1556-82, D-2937 or D-2922 & D-3017, at intervals of approximately two feet of fill height per 10,000 sq. ft. or every one thousand cubic yards of fill placed. These criteria would vary depending on the soil conditions and the size of the project. The location and frequency of testing would be at the discretion of the geotechnical consultant Contractor’s Responsibility All clearing, site preparation, and earthwork performed on the project should be conducted by the contractor, with observation by geotechnical consultants and staged approval by the appropriate governing agencies. It is the contractor’s responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive the fill to the satisfaction of the soil engineer, and to place, spread, moisture condition, mix and compact the fill in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer. The contractor should also remove all major deleterious material considered unsatisfactory by the soil engineer. It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with applicable grading guidelines, codes or agency ordinances, and approved grading plans. Sufficient watering apparatus and compaction equipment should be provided by the contractor with due consideration for the fill material, rate of placement, and climatic conditions. If, in the opinion of the geotechnical consultant, unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable weather, excessive oversized rock, deleterious material or insufficient support equipment are resulting in a quality of work that is not acceptable, the consultant will inform the contractor, and the contractor is expected to rectify the conditions, and if necessary, stop work until conditions are satisfactory. The contractor will properly grade all surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of water. The contractor will take action to control surface water and to prevent erosion control measures that have been installed. SITE PREPARATION All vegetation including brush, trees, thick grasses, organic debris, and other deleterious material should be removed and disposed of offsite, and must be concluded prior to placing fill. Existing fill, soil, alluvium, colluvium, or rock materials determined by the soil engineer or engineering geologist as unsuitable for structural in-place support should be removed prior to fill placement. Depending upon the soil conditions, these materials may be reused as compacted fills. Any materials incorporated as part of the compacted fills should be approved by the soil engineer. Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipelines, or other structures not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a manner recommended by the soil engineer. Soft, dry, spongy, highly fractured, or otherwise unsuitable ground extending to such a depth that surface processing cannot adequately improve the condition should be over excavated down to firm ground and approved by the soil engineer before compaction and filling operations continue. Over excavated and processed soils which have been properly mixed and moisture-conditioned should be recompacted to the minimum relative compaction as specified in these guidelines. ---PAGE BREAK--- Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Existing ground which is determined to be satisfactory for support of the fills should be scarified to a minimum depth of six inches, or as directed by the soil engineer. After the scarified ground is brought to optimum moisture (or greater) and mixed, the materials should be compacted as specified herein. If the scarified zone is greater than 6 inches in depth, it may be necessary to remove the excess and place the material in lifts restricted to six inches in compacted thickness. Existing grind which is not satisfactory to support compacted fill should be over excavated as required in the geotechnical report or by the onsite soils engineer and/or engineering geologists. Scarification, discing, or other acceptable form of mixing should continue until the soils are broken down and free of large fragments or clods, until the working surface is reasonably uniform and free from ruts, hollows, hummocks, or other uneven features which would inhibit compaction as described above. Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient, the ground should be benched. The lowest bench, which will act as a key, should be a minimum of 12 feet wide and should be at least two feet deep into competent material, approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. In fill over cut slope conditions, the recommended minimum width of the lowest bench or key is at least 15 feet with the key excavated on competent material, as designated by the Geotechnical Consultant. As a general rule, unless superseded by the Soil Engineer, the minimum width of fill keys should be approximately equal to one-half the height of the slope. Standard benching is typically four feet (minimum) vertically, exposing competent material. Benching may be used to remove unsuitable materials, although it is understood that the vertical height of the bench may exceed four feet. Pre stripping may be considered for removal of unsuitable materials in excess of four feet in thickness. All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and toe of fill benches should be observed and approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist prior to placement of fill. Fills may then be properly placed and compacted until design grades are attained. COMPACTED FILLS Earth materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized as fill provided that each soil type has been accepted by the soil engineer. These materials should be free of roots, tree branches, other organic matter or other deleterious materials. All unsuitable materials should be removed from the fill as directed by the soil engineer. Soils of poor gradation, undesirable expansion potential, or substandard strength characteristics may be designated unsuitable by the consultant and may require mixing with other earth materials to serve as a satisfactory fill material. Fill materials generated from benching operations should be dispersed throughout the fill area. Benching operations should not result in the benched material being placed only within a single equipment width away from the fill/bedrock contact. 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Oversized materials, defined as rock or other irreducible materials with a maximum size exceeding 12 inches in one dimension, should not be buried or placed in fills unless the location of materials and disposal methods are specifically approved by the soil engineer. Oversized material should be taken offsite or placed in accordance with recommendations of the soil engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. Oversized material should not be placed vertically within 10 feet of finish grade or horizontally within 20 feet of slope faces. To facilitate trenching, rock should not be placed within the range of foundation excavations or future utilities unless specifically approved by the soil engineer and/or the representative developers. If import fill material is required for grading, representative samples of the material should be analyzed in the laboratory by the soil engineer to determine its physical properties. If any material other than that previously analyzed is imported to the fill or encountered during grading, analysis of this material should be conducted by the soil engineer as soon as practical. Fill material should be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in near-horizontal layers that should not exceed six inches compacted in thickness. The soil engineer may approve thicker lifts if testing indicates the grading procedures are such that adequate compaction is being achieved. Each layer should be spread evenly and mixed to attain uniformity of material and moisture suitable for compaction. Fill materials at moisture content less than optimum should be watered and mixed, and “wet” fill materials should be aerated by scarification, or should be mixed with drier material. Moisture conditioning and mixing of fill materials should continue until the fill materials have uniform moisture content at or above optimum moisture. After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture-conditioned and mixed, it should be uniformly compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density as determined by ASTM test designation, D 1557-78, or as otherwise recommended by the soil engineer. Compaction equipment should be adequately sized and should be reliable to efficiently achieve the required degree of compaction. Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required relative compaction or improper moisture content, the particular layer or portion will be reworked until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill will be placed in an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and moisture requirements, and is approved by the soil engineer. Compaction of slopes should be accomplished by over-building the outside edge a minimum of three feet horizontally, and subsequently trimming back to the finish design slope configuration. Testing will be performed as the fill is horizontally placed to evaluate compaction as the fill core is being developed. Special efforts may be necessary to attain the specified compaction in the fill slope zone. Final slope shaping should be performed by trimming and removing loose materials with appropriate equipment. A final determination of fill slope compaction should be based on observation and/or testing of the finished slope face. 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Earthwork and Grading Guidelines If an alternative to over-building and cutting back the compacted fill slope is selected, then additional efforts should be made to achieve the required compaction in the outer 10 feet of each lift of fill by undertaking the following: • Equipment consisting of a heavy short-shanked sheepsfoot should be used to roll (horizontal) parallel to the slopes continuously as fill is placed. The sheepsfoot roller should also be used to roll perpendicular to the slopes, and extend out over the slope to provide adequate compaction to the face slope. • Loose fill should not be spilled out over the face of the slope as each lift is compacted. Any loose fill spilled over a previously completed slope face should be trimmed off or be subject to re-rolling. • Field compaction tests will be made in the outer two to five feet of the slope at two to three foot vertical intervals, subsequent to compaction operations. • After completion of the slope, the slope face should be shaped with a small dozer and then re-rolled with a sheepsfoot to achieve compaction to near the slope face. Subsequent to testing to verify compaction, the slopes should be grid-rolled to achieve adequate compaction to the slope face. Final testing should be used to confirm compaction after grid rolling. • Where testing indicates less than adequate compaction, the contractor will be responsible to process, moisture condition, mix and recompact the slope materials as necessary to achieve compaction. Additional testing should be performed to verify compaction. • Erosion control and drainage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer or engineering geologist. EXCAVATIONS Excavations and cut slopes should be observed and mapped during grading by the engineering geologist. If directed by the engineering geologist, further excavations or over-excavation and refilling of cut areas should be performed. When fills over cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope should be observed by the engineering geologist prior to placement of the overlying fill portion of the slope. The engineering geologist should observe all cut slopes and should be notified by the contractor when cut slopes are started. If, during the course of grading, unanticipated adverse or potentially adverse geologic conditions are encountered, the engineering geologist and soil engineer should investigate, evaluate and make recommendations to mitigate (or limit) these conditions. The need for cut slope buttressing or stabilizing should be based on as-grading evaluations by the engineering geologist, whether anticipated previously or not. Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes should be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies. Additionally, short-term stability of temporary cut slopes is the contractor’s responsibility. 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Earthwork and Grading Guidelines Erosion control and drainage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer and should be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer or engineering geologist. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION Subdrains should be installed in accordance with the approved embedment material, alignment and details indicated by the geotechnical consultant. Subdrain locations or construction materials should not be changed or modified without approval of the geotechnical consultant. The soil engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend and direct changes in subdrain line, grade and drain material in the field, pending exposed conditions. The location of constructed subdrains should be recorded by the project civil engineer. COMPLETION Consultation, observation and testing by the geotechnical consultant should be completed during grading operations in order to state an opinion that all cut and filled areas are graded in accordance with the approved project specifications. After completion of grading and after the soil engineer and engineering geologist have finished their observations, final reports should be submitted subject to review by the controlling governmental agencies. No additional grading should be undertaken without prior notification of the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. All finished cut and fill slopes should be protected from erosion, including but not limited to planting in accordance with the plan design specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape architect. Such protection and/or planning should be undertaken as soon as possible after completion of grading. ATTACHMENTS Figure A – Transition Lot Detail Cut Lot Figure B – Transition Lot Detail Cut - Fill Figure C – Rock Disposal Pits Figure D – Detail for Fill Slope Toeing out on a Flat Alluviated Canyon Figure E – Removal Adjacent to Existing Fill Figure F – Daylight Cut Lot Detail Figure G – Skin Fill of Natural Ground Figure H – Typical Stabilization Buttress Fill Design Figure I – Stabilization Fill for Unstable Material Exposed in Portion of Cut Slope Figure J – Fill Over Cut Detail Figure K – Fill Over Natural Detail Figure L – Oversize Rock Disposal Figure M – Canyon Subdrain Detail Figure N – Canyon Subdrain Alternate Details Figure O – Typical Stabilization Buttress Subdrain Detail Figure P – Retaining Wall Backfill 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- 5' Minimum 3' Minimum* Natural Grade Overexcavate and Recompact Unweathered Bedrock or Approved Material Pad Grade Compacted Fill Typical Benching TRANSITION LOT DETAIL CUT LOT – MATERIAL TYPE TRANSITION * The soils engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend deeper overexcavation in steep cut-fill transitions. Note: Figure not to scale Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES TRANSITION LOT DETAIL CUT LOT – MATERIAL TYPE TRANSITION FIGURE A ---PAGE BREAK--- Typical Benching * The soils engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend deeper overexcavation in steep cut-fill transitions. 5' Minimum Natural Grade Overexcavate and Recompact Unweathered Bedrock or Approved Material Pad Grade Compacted Fill TRANSITION LOT DETAIL CUT – FILL – DAYLIGHT TRANSITION Remove: Topsoil, Colluvium, or Unstable Material 3' Minimum* Note: Figure not to scale FIGURE B Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES TRANSITION LOT DETAIL CUT – FILL – DAYLIGHT TRANSITION ---PAGE BREAK--- ROCK DISPOSAL PITS Note: Large rock is defined as having a diameter larger than 3 feet in maximum size. Pit shall be excavated into compacted fill to a depth equal to half of the rock size. Granular soil shall be pushed into the pit and then flooded around the rock using a sheepsfoot to help with compaction. A minimum of 3 feet of compacted fill should be laid over each pit. Pits shall have at least 15 feet of separation between one another, horizontally. Pits shall be placed at least 20 feet from any fill slope. Pits shall be used only in deep fill areas. Note: Figure not to scale Size of excavation to be commensurate with rock size. Compacted fill Fill lifts compacted over rock after embedment Granular material Large Rock/Boulder Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES ROCK DISPOSAL PITS FIGURE C ---PAGE BREAK--- DETAIL FOR FILL SLOPE TOEING OUT ON FLAT ALLUVIATED CANYON Note: Figure not to scale Toe of slope as shown on grading plan Original ground surface to be restored with compacted fill. Backcut varies for deep removals. A backcut shall not be made steeper than a slope of 1:1 or as necessary for safety considerations. 1:1 minimum Compacted fill Original ground surface Anticipated alluvial removal depth per soils engineer. Provide a 1:1 minimum projection from the toe of the slope as shown on the grading plan to the recommended depth. Factors such as slope height, site conditions, and/or local conditions could demand shallower projections. FIGURE D Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES DETAIL FOR FILL SLOPE TOEING OUT ON A FLAT ALLUVIATED CANYON ---PAGE BREAK--- REMOVAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING FILL Note: Figure not to scale Adjoining Canyon Fill 1:1 Slope Proposed additional compacted fill Compacted fill limits line Temporary compacted fill for drainage only To be removed before placing additional compacted fill Qaf (Existing compacted fill) Qaf Qal (To be removed) Legend Qaf - Artificial Fill Qal - Alluvium FIGURE E EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES REMOVAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING FILL Expertise . . Service . . Solutions ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figure not to scale Note: Subdrain and key width requirements shall be determined based on exposed subsurface conditions and the thickness of overburden. Pad overexcavation and recompaction shall be completed if determined as necessary by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES DAYLIGHT CUT LOT DETAIL FIGURE F DAYLIGHT CUT LOT DETAIL Fill slope shall be recompacted at a 2:1 ratio (this may increase or decrease the area of the pad) Remove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable material Overexcavate and recompact fill Avoid and/or clean up spillage of materials on the natural slope Natural Grade Proposed finish grade 3' minimum blanket fill Bedrock or approved material Typical benching 2' minimum key depth Minimum 1:1 projection 2% gradient ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figure not to scale Note: The need and disposition of drains will be determined by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist based on site conditions. Pad overexcavation and recompaction shall be completed if determined as necessary by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES SKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUND FIGURE G SKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUND 15' minimum key width 2' minimum key depth 3' minimum key depth 3' minimum Proposed finish grade Original slope Proposed finish grade 15' minimum to be maintained from proposed finish slope face to backcut Remove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable material Bedrock or approved materials ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figure not to scale TYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGN W = H/2 or a minimum of 15' 3' minimum key depth Bedrock 4" diameter non-perforated outlet pipe and backdrain (see alternatives) Typical benching Blanket fill if recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist 15' minimum 10' minimum 25' maximum Design finish slope Outlets shall be spaced at 100' maximum intervals, and should extend 12" beyond the face of the slope at the finish of of rough grading 2% gradient 15' is typical 1'-2' clear Toe Heel Buttress or sidehill fill Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES TYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGN FIGURE H Gravel-fabric drain material ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figure not to scale Note: The need and disposition of drains will be determined by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist based on site conditions. Pad overexcavation and recompaction shall be completed if determined as necessary by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES SKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUND FIGURE G SKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUND 15' minimum key width 2' minimum key depth 3' minimum key depth 3' minimum Proposed finish grade Original slope Proposed finish grade 15' minimum to be maintained from proposed finish slope face to backcut Remove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable material Bedrock or approved materials ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figure not to scale TYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGN W = H/2 or a minimum of 15' 3' minimum key depth Bedrock 4" diameter non-perforated outlet pipe and backdrain (see alternatives) Typical benching Blanket fill if recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist 15' minimum 10' minimum 25' maximum Design finish slope Outlets shall be spaced at 100' maximum intervals, and should extend 12" beyond the face of the slope at the finish of of rough grading 2% gradient 15' is typical 1'-2' clear Toe Heel Buttress or sidehill fill Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES TYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGN FIGURE H Gravel-fabric drain material ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figure not to scale Note: Subdrains are required only if specified by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. shall be the equipment width (15') for slope heights less than 25 feet. For slopes greater than 25 feet shall be determined by the project soils engineer and/or the engineering geologist. shall never be less than H/2. Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES STABILIZATION FILL FOR UNSTABLE MATERIAL EXPOSED IN PORTION OF CUT SLOPE FIGURE I STABILIZATION FILL FOR UNSTABLE MATERIAL EXPOSED IN PORTION OF CUT SLOPE Compacted stabilization fill H1 H2 W1 W2 1' minimum tilted back If recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist, the remaining cut portion of the slope may require removal and replacement with compacted fill. Remove: unstable material 15' minimum Remove unstable material Natural Slope Proposed finished grade Unweathered bedrock or approved material ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figure not to scale Note: The cut sectioin shall be excavated and evaluated by the soils engineer/engineering geologist prior to constructing the fill portion. Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES FILL OVER CUT DETAIL FIGURE J FILL OVER CUT DETAIL H Maintain minimum 15' fill section from backcut to face of finish slope Proposed grade Cut/Fill Contact: As shown on grading plan Cut/Fill Contact: As shown on as built Cut slope Original topography Remove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable material Compacted fill 3' minimum Lowest bench width 15' minimum or H/2 2' minimum Bedrock or approved material Bench width may vary ---PAGE BREAK--- Proposed Grade Note: Figures not to scale Compacted Fill Maintain Minimum 15' Width Slope To Bench/Backcut Toe of slope as shown on grading plan Bench Width May Vary 3' Minimum 15' Minimum key width 2' X 3' Minimum key depth 2' minimum in bedrock or approved material Backcut Varies Natural slope to be restored with compacted fill Provide a 1:1 minimum projection from design toe of slope to toe of key as shown on as built Note: Special recommendations shall be provided by the soils engineer/engineering geologist where the natural slope approaches or exceeds the design slope ratio. The need for and disposition of drains would be determined by the soils engineer/engineering geologist based upon exposed conditions. Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES FILL OVER NATURAL DETAIL SIDEHILL FILL FIGURE K Remove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable material 4' Minimum FILL OVER NATURAL DETAIL SIDEHILL FILL ---PAGE BREAK--- OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL View Normal to Slope Face Bedrock or Approved Material Proposed Finish Grade Note: One Equipment width or a minimum of 15 feet. Height and width may vary depending on rock size and type of equipment used. Length of windrow shall be no greater than 100 feet maximum. If approved by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Orientation of windrows may vary but shall be as recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Unless recommended staggering of windrows is not necessary. Areas shall be cleared for utility trenches, foundations, and swimming pools. Voids in windrows shall be filled by flooding granular soil into place. Granular soil shall be any soil which has a unified soil classification system (Universal Building Code (UBC) 29-1). Designation of SM, SP, SW, GP, or GW. After fill between windrows is placed and compacted with the lift of fill covering windrow, windrow shall be proof rolled with a D-9 dozer or equivalent. Oversized rock is defined as larger than 12", and less than 4 feet in size. 10' minimum 15' minimum 5' minimum 15' minimum 20' minimum View Parallel to Slope Face Bedrock or Approved Material Proposed Finish Grade 100' maximum 10' minimum 5' minimum 10' minimum 3' minimum Note: All distances are approximate 0 FT 18 FT 30 FT 60 FT Approximate Scale: 1" = 30' Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL FIGURE L ---PAGE BREAK--- CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL Note: Alternatives, locations, and extent of subdrains should be determined by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist during actual grading. Note: Figures not to scale Type A Type B Proposed Compacted Fill Natural ground Colluvium and alluvium (remove) See alternatives (Figure N) Typical benching Proposed Compacted Fill Natural ground Colluvium and alluvium (remove) See alternatives (Figure N) FIGURE M Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL Typical benching ---PAGE BREAK--- CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS Alternate 1: Perforated Pipe and Filter Material Filter material: Minimum volume of 9 feet3/linear foot. 6" diameter ABS or PVC pipe or approved substitute with minimum 8 diameter) perforations per linear foot in bottom half of pipe. ASTM D 2751, SDR 35 or ASTM D 1527, Schedule 40. ASTM D 3034, SDR 35 or ASTM D 1785, Schedule 40. For continuous run in excess of 500 feet use 8" diameter pipe. 6" Minimum 6" Minimum 6" Minimum 12" Minimum Alternate 2: Perforated Pipe, Gravel and Filter Fabric Minimum Overlap Minimum Bedding 6" 4" 6" Minimum Cover Minimum Bedding 4" 6" Note: Figures not to scale Minimum Overlap Gravel material 9 feet3/linear foot. Perforated pipe: see alternate 1. Gravel: Clean ¾” rock or approved substitute. Filter Fabric: Mirafi 140 or approved substitute. Filter Material Sieve Size 1" ¾” 3/8" No. 4 No. 8 No. 30 No. 50 No. 200 Percent Passing 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 18-33 5-15 0-7 0-3 FIGURE N Expertise . . Service . . Solutions EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS ---PAGE BREAK--- Note: Figures not to scale TYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS SUBDRAIN DETAIL 4" minimum pipe 2' minimum 2" minimum 2" minimum 2' minimum 2" minimum 4" minimum pipe 3' minimum Filter Material: Minimum of 5 ft3/linear foot of pipe or 4 ft3/linear foot of pipe when placed in square cut trench. Filter Material Sieve Size 1" ¾” 3/8" No. 4 No. 8 No. 30 No. 50 No. 200 Percent Passing 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 18-33 5-15 0-7 0-3 Note: Trench for outlet pipes shall be backfilled with onsite soil. Backdrains and lateral drains shall be located at the elevation of every bench drain. First drain shall be located at the elevation just above the lower lot grade. Additional drains may be required at the discretion of the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Alternative In Lieu Of Filter Material: Gravel may be encased in approved filter fabric. Filter fabric shall be mirafi 140 or equivalent. Filter fabric shall be lapped a minimum of 12" on all joints. Minimum 4" Diameter Pipe: ABS-ASTM D-2751, SDR 35 or ASTM D-1527 schedule 40 PVC-ASTM D-3034, SDR 35 or ASTM D-1785 schedule 40 with a crushing strength of 1,000 pounds minimum, and a minimum of 8 uniformly spaced perforations per foot of pipe installed with perforations at bottom of pipe. Provide cap at upstream end of pipe. Slope at 2% to outlet pipe. Outlet pipe shall be connected to the subdrain pipe with tee or elbow. Filter Material – Shall be of the following specification or an approved equivalent: Gravel - Shall be of the following specification or an approved equivalent: Filter Material Sieve Size 1½" No. 4 No. 200 Percent Passing 100 50 8 Sand equivalent: Minimum of 50 FIGURE O EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES TYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS SUBDRAIN DETAIL Expertise . . Service . . Solutions ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 2195 Faraday Avenue Suite KCarlsbad, California 92008-7207 Ph: [PHONE REDACTED]Fax: [PHONE REDACTED]www.eeitiger.com PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28 Anaheim, California 92805 February 7, 2012 EEI Project Number SHO-71418 ---PAGE BREAK--- PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Mr. Brian Rupp Shopoff Advisors, LP 2 Park Plaza, Suite 700 Irvine, CA 92614 Site location: 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28. Anaheim, California 92805 Prepared and edited by: Polly Ivers Staff Scientist Reviewed by: Bernard A. Sentianin, PG 5530, REA I 3477 Principal Geologist EEI 2195 Faraday Avenue, Suite K Carlsbad, California 92008-7207 [PHONE REDACTED] EEI Project Number SHO-71418 ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL SITE EXECUTIVE ii 1.0 1.1 1.2 Scope of Services 1.3 2.0 PHYSIOGRAPHIC 2.1 Site TABLE 1 Current Tenant 2.2 Topography 2.3 Regional and Local 2.4 Regional and Local Hydrogeology 2.5 Hydrologic Flood Plain 3.0 SITE BACKGROUND 3.1 Site 3.2 Site 3.2.1 Aerial Photograph Review and Historical Map Review TABLE 2 Summary of Aerial Photograph 3.2.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance 3.2.3 City/County Directories TABLE 3 Summary of City/County Directory Search 3.2.4 City of Anaheim Building Department Files 3.3 Regulatory Database 3.3.1 Federal 3.3.2 State and Regional 3.4 Regulatory Agency Review 3.4.1 City of Anaheim Fire 3.4.2 City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department 3.4.3 Orange County Health Care 3.4.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control 3.4.5 State Water Resources Control 3.4.6 Review of Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources 3.4.7 National Pipeline Mapping 3.5 Interview with Current Property 3.5.1 Past or Present Uses Indicating Environmental 3.5.2 Deed Restrictions, Activity or Land Use Restrictions, or Environmental Liens......15 3.5.3 Presence of Hazardous Substances or Environmental 3.5.4 Environmental Investigations or 3.5.5 Legal Proceedings 3.5.6 Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based 3.6 User Provided 3.6.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use 3.6.2 Specialized 3.6.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental 3.6.4 Presence or Likely Presence of 3.6.5 ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3.7 Previous 3.8 Other Environmental Issues 3.8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials 3.8.2 Lead-Based 3.8.3 Radon 3.8.4 Biphenyls 4.0 SITE 4.1 4.2 Subject TABLE 4 – Summary of Site 4.3 Adjacent Properties 5.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS 6.0 DATA 6.1 Historical Data Gaps 6.2 Regulatory Data Gaps 6.3 On-Site Data 6.4 Deviations from ASTM Practices 7.0 8.0 REFERENCES FIGURES: Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2 – Aerial Site Map APPENDICES: Appendix A – Résumé of Environmental Professional Appendix B – Preliminary Title Reports Appendix C – Historical Aerial Photographs/ Topographic Maps/County Directory Search Appendix D – Environmental Records Search Appendix E – User Provided Information Appendix F – Photographic Log ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Project Information: Commercial Property EEI Project Number: SHO-71418 Site Information: 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28 Anaheim, California 92805 Site Access Contact: Brian Rupp (949) 231-5068 Consultant Information: EEI 2195 Faraday Ave., Suite K Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Fax: [PHONE REDACTED] E-mail Address: [EMAIL REDACTED] Inspection Date: January 19, 2012 Report Date: February 7, 2012 Client Information: Mr. Brian Rupp Shopoff Advisors, LP 2 Park Plaza, Suite 700 Irvine, CA 92614 Site Assessor: Bernard A. Sentianin – Principal Geologist EP Certification: I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10 (Resume, Appendix Bernard A. Sentianin – Principal Geologist AAI Certification: We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Bernard A. Sentianin – Principal Geologist i ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request and authorization of Shopoff Advisors, LP (“Client”), EEI conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California. The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to assess the presence or likely presence of an existing, historical, or threatened release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures, soil, and/or groundwater beneath the subject property, to the extent practical recognized environmental conditions as delineated in ASTM E1527- 05). The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street, in the City of Anaheim, in northern County of Orange. The subject property encompasses approximately 13-acres on four parcels identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28. The subject property is occupied with 5 commercial buildings identified as: 905 and 915 E Katella (APN 082-261-23); 917 E Katella (APN 082-261-24) Part of same large building as 905/915; 1005, 1015 and 1025 E Katella (APN 082-261-27); and 1105 E Katella (APN 082-261-28) Mr. Stox Restaurant. The westernmost property (905-917) is the location of an approximately 175,000 square-foot (sf) industrial building occupied with multiple tenants including Golden West Medical. The adjacent parcels to the east (1015-1025) contain two approximately 15,000 sf industrial buildings with multiple tenants including Axxis Motorsports. To the south of these buildings, is an approximately 10,000 sf restaurant, identified as Mr. Stox”(1105), at the southeast corner of the overall property. Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005) is located to the west of the restaurant and is utilized for storage. According to the City of Anaheim, the subject is zoned as General Industrial and is located within the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) land use designation. The subject property is generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties to in all directions. It is immediately bound by Omni Duct (1700 South Lewis Street) to the north, East Katella Avenue to the south, a vacant lot and residential property to the east, and South Lewis Street to the west. A former gas station (Former Unocal -1818 South Lewis Street) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street),) is located to the southwest at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street. Based on historical records such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, and City directories and building records, the subject property was developed with orchards and a rural residence from at least 1938. The property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the orchards were cleared. In 1969, the restaurant on the southeast corner of the subject property was developed, and has been occupied with Mr. Stox Restaurant since that time. In 1970, the 905-917 East Katella Avenue building was constructed and originally occupied with Whirlpool Corporation. Additions to the structure were reportedly made in 1978 and 1989. The building has been occupied with various commercial/industrial tenants since that time. In 1978, City records indicate a residence was demolished (1021 East Katella Avenue) and two warehouse buildings (1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue) were developed and have been occupied with various tenants since that time. Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005 East Katella Avenue) was constructed on the subject property in the early 1980s and has been utilized for storage since that time. EEI contacted the Orange County Health Care Agency, California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), State Water Resources Control Board and reviewed other State and Federal databases to determine if the subject property, or any adjacent properties, were listed as hazardous waste generators, underground storage tank releases (UST), or as having other environmental concerns spill, leak, or aboveground tank). Neither the subject property nor any immediately adjacent property was listed on any of the databases researched. ii ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 iii Four nearby sites were identified as closed LUST cases, where the soil only was impacted. The sites include: Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south across Katella Avenue); Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street); Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet south); and Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south). Based on regulatory oversight, and case closed status of the releases, these sites are not considered to be an environmental concern at this time. On January 18, 2012, EEI personnel conducted a site reconnaissance to physically observe the site and adjoining properties for conditions indicating a potential environmental concern. Concerns would include any evidence of contamination, distressed vegetation, petroleum-hydrocarbon staining, waste drums, illegal dumping, or improper waste storage and/or handling. EEI observed small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning products; propane/electric batteries in the New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products suites, and small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste in the Golden West Medical suite in building 905-917 East Katella Avenue. Small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, and used tires were observed in the Axxis Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsky suites, and minor quantities of cleaning products, lubricants, and or paint were noted in all of the suites in building 1015-1025 East Katella Avenue. The quantities of these stored chemicals are considered de minimus and not an environmental concern. No other evidence of environmental concern was noted on the subject property during our site reconnaissance We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Designation E1527-05 for subject property located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue, City of Anaheim, California. This Phase I ESA has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to assess the possible presence of recognized environmental conditions for the located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California (Figure Recognized environmental conditions include property uses that may indicate the presence or likely presence of an existing, historical, or threatened release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures, soil, and/or groundwater beneath the property. The term recognized environmental conditions is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment, and that would not be subject to enforcement action by a regulatory agency. This ESA was performed in general conformance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation E1527-05. 1.2 Scope of Services The following scope of services was conducted by EEI: • A review of readily available documents which included topographic, geologic, and hydrogeologic conditions associated with the subject site. • A review of readily available maps, aerial photographs and other documents relative to historical subject site usage and development. • A review of previous environmental reports and regulatory file information pertaining to both existing and historic site conditions. • A review of readily available federal, state, county, and city documents and database files concerning hazardous material storage, generation and disposal, active and inactive landfills, existing environmental concerns, and associated permits related to the subject property and/or immediately adjacent sites. • A site reconnaissance to ascertain current conditions on the subject property. • Interviews with person(s) knowledgeable of the subject property. • The preparation of this report which presents our findings, conclusions, and recommendations. 1.3 Reliance This ESA has been prepared for the sole use of Shopoff Advisors, LP (Client). This assessment should not be relied upon by other parties without the express written consent of EEI and the Client. Any use or reliance upon this assessment by a party other than the Client therefore, shall be solely at the risk of such third party and without legal recourse against EEI, its employees, officers, or directors, regardless of whether the action in which recovery of damages is brought or based upon contract, tort, statute or otherwise. 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 This assessment should not be interpreted as a statistical evaluation of the subject site, but rather is intended to provide a preliminary indication of onsite impacts from previous site usage and/or the release of hazardous materials. If no significant indicators of the presence of hazardous materials and/or petroleum contamination are encountered during this search, this does not preclude their presence. The findings in this report are based upon published geologic and hydrogeologic information, and information (both documentary and oral) provided by the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, FirstSearch® agency database search), various state and federal agencies, and EEI’s field observations. Some of these data are subject to change over time. Some of these data are based on information not currently observable or measurable, but recorded by documents or orally reported by individuals. 2.0 PHYSIOGRAPHIC SETTING 2.1 Site Description The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street, in the City of Anaheim, in northern County of Orange (Figure The subject property encompasses approximately 13- acres on four parcels identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28. The subject property is occupied with four commercial buildings identified as: 905 and 915 E Katella (APN 082-261-23); 917 E Katella (APN 082-261-24) part of same large building as 905/915; 1005, 1015 and 1025 E Katella (APN 082-261-27); and 1105 E Katella (APN 082-261-28) Mr. Stox Restaurant. According to the City of Anaheim, the subject property is zoned as General Industrial and is located within the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) land use designation. The Westernmost property (905-917) is the location of an approximately 175,000 square-foot (sf) industrial building occupied with multiple tenants including Golden West Medical. The adjacent parcels to the east (1015-1025) contain two approximately 15,000 sf industrial buildings with multiple tenants including Axxis Motorsports. To the south of these buildings, is an approximately 10,000 sf restaurant, identified as Mr. Stox” (1105), at the southeast corner of the overall property. Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005) is located to the west of the restaurant and is utilized for storage. A current tenant list is provided below in Table 1. Table 1 - Current Tenant List 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 East Katella Avenue 905 915 917 New Image Office Designs Inc.; Evriholder Products, LLC Golden West Medical Tandem Design Inc. 1005 Thomas G. Ewing Storage; Trash Busters; Leigh Gately; Telco Electric 1015 Suites A through J A & B) Al Amoto Crossfit C )Telco Electric D) Infinity Rental E) Western Dental Services F, G, H) Digiech Business Solutions J) Wholesale Auto Detailing 1025 Suites A through J A) RBR Motorsports B) Hot Dog Carts C, D, E) Axxis Motorsports F) Wholesale Auto G) Auto Repair H)Storage Misc. J) Pro Cut Concrete 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 The subject property is generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties to in all directions. It is immediately bound by Omni Duct (1700 South Lewis Street) to the north, East Katella Avenue to the south, a vacant lot and residential property to the east, and South Lewis Street to the west. A former gas station (Former Unocal -1818 South Lewis Street) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street),) is located to the southwest at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street. Based on historical records such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, and City directories and building records, the subject property was developed with orchards and a rural residence from at least 1938. The property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the orchards were cleared. In 1969, the restaurant on the southeast corner of the subject property was developed, and has been occupied with Mr. Stox Restaurant since that time. In 1970, the 905-917 East Katella Avenue building was constructed and originally occupied with Whirlpool Corporation. Additions to the structure were reportedly made in 1978 and 1989. The building has been occupied with various commercial/industrial tenants since that time. In 1978, City records indicate a residence was demolished (1021 East Katella Avenue) and two warehouse buildings (1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue) were developed and have been occupied with various tenants since that time. Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005 East Katella Avenue) was constructed on the subject property in the early 1980s and has been utilized for storage since that time. 2.2 Topography The subject property is located on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Anaheim, California 7.5 Minute Quadrangle map (USGS, 1981). According to this map, the elevation of the subject property is approximately 148-feet above mean sea level (amsl). Surface drainage on the subject property drains to the southwest towards the storm drains along East Katella Avenue. 2.3 Regional and Local Geology The City of Anaheim lies within the central block of the Los Angeles Basin, to the south of the Coyote Hills uplift. This portion of the central block of the Los Angeles Basin is considered part of the Central Plain. The Central Plain is bound by the Whittier Fault to the north and northeast, by the Santa Ana Mountains and San Joaquin Hills to the east and southeast, and by the Newport-Inglewood Fault to the south and west. Approximately 9,700 meters of marine and non-marine Cretaceous to Pleistocene sedimentary rock fills the Central Plain (CDMG, 2002). According to the City of Anaheim General Plan, there are no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones within the City limits. The Newport-Ingelwood Fault (located approximately 7 miles southwest of the property) and the Whittier-Elsinore Fault Zone (located approximately 7 miles northeast of the property) nearest active faults zoned under the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Potentially active faults within the vicinity of the property include the Norwalk Fault (located approximately 5 miles north of the property), the El Modeno Fault (located approximately 3 miles northeast of the property), and the Peralta Hills Fault (located approximately 13 miles east of the property) (SCEC, 1998). Sedimentary deposits near the site are dominated by Pleistocene to Quaternary-aged marine and non-marine terrace deposits that range in thickness from a few meters to over 1,100 meters. Recent alluvial soils in the Los Angeles Basin are derived primarily from older sedimentary rocks in the Santa Ana and San Gabriel Mountains. 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Soil in the vicinity of the site is identified by the United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service as loamy sand of the Metz Series (USDA, 1978). The Metz series consists of very deep, somewhat excessively drained soils that formed in alluvial material from mixed, but dominantly sedimentary rocks. Metz soils are on floodplains and alluvial fans and have slopes of 0 to 15 percent. These soils are somewhat excessively drained; have negligible to low runoff; and moderately rapid permeability. 2.4 Regional and Local Hydrogeology According to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board -Santa Ana Region 1995), the site is located in the East Coastal Plain Hydrologic Subarea (HSA), of the Lower Santa Ana River Hydrologic Unit. Groundwater in the East Coast Plain HSA has listed beneficial uses for Agricultural, Municipal, Industrial and Industrial Process Supply purposes. The site area is located within a pressure zone where semi-confined to confined water conditions exits. Groundwater within the aquifer of the pressure zone in the site vicinity generally flows to the west-southwest (OCWD, 1982). EEI reviewed the California Department of Water Resources Water Data Library (WDL, 2012) Website for information regarding wells and depth to groundwater information. A review indicated that three public water wells are located within a one half mile of the subject property. The nearest well, 04S10W26C001S, located approximately 0.23 miles west, reported depth to groundwater at 140.4 feet below ground surface (bgs), measured in 1973. Well number 04S10W23R001S, located approximately 0.34 miles northeast reported depth to groundwater at 890.8 feet bgs, measured in 1969. Well 04S10W25F001S, approximately 0.50 miles east, reported depth to groundwater at 131 feet bgs, measured in 2008. Based on information provided on GeoTracker, the nearby Former Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street, reported depth to groundwater at approximately 80 to 100 feet below ground surface (bgs). The groundwater flow direction of the site was not indicated. In general, groundwater is often expected to follow the direction of surface topography. Based on topography, regional groundwater flow direction can be expected to generally be in a southwesterly to westerly direction (USGS, 1981). 2.5 Hydrologic Flood Plain Information EEI reviewed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) website (FEMA, 2012) to determine if the subject property lies within a Flood Hazard Zone as designated by FEMA. According to the Federal Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map Number 06059C0142J, Panel Number 142 of 539, reviewed, the subject property is not situated within a flood zone. 3.0 SITE BACKGROUND 3.1 Site Ownership Information regarding site ownership was provided by Preliminary Title Reports for each of the subject parcels prepared by Fidelity National Title Company (Appendix The current owner of subject parcels APNs 082-261-23 and -24 (905-917 East Katella Avenue) is listed as K/L Anaheim Properties I and II, LLC. The current owner of subject parcel ASPNs 082-261-27 (1005, 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue) is listed as See Development. The current owner of subject parcel APNs 082-261-28 (1105 East Katella Avenue) is listed Ronald and Deborah Marshall. 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 3.2 Site History EEI reviewed readily available information sources to evaluate historic land use in and around the subject site. These information sources include aerial photographs, USGS maps, City/County Directory search, City of Anaheim building records. The information sources are reviewed in the following sections. 3.2.1 Aerial Photograph and Historical Map Review Aerial photographs and historical topographical maps were reviewed to identify historical land development and any surface conditions which may have impacted the subject property. Photographs and historical topographic maps dating 1898, 1906, 1935, 1938, 1942, 1947, 1950, 1953, 1965, 1968, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1983, 1995, 2002 and 2010 were obtained and reviewed from Track Info Services/FirstSearch®, an environmental information/database retrieval service. A 2011 aerial photograph was obtained and reviewed from GoogleEarth, a copy of which is included herein (Figure Table 1 summarizes the results of the historical use review. Copies of the aerial photographs and historical topographic maps provided by Track Info Services/FirstSearch® are included in Appendix C. Based on the data reviewed the subject property was developed with orchards and a rural residence from at least 1938. The property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the orchards were cleared, but remained with a residence and utilized for agriculture. In 1977, the subject property appeared developed with two commercial structures (905-917 and 1105). Two additional structures (1015 and 1025) appeared on the subject property in 1983. These four structures have remained on the subject property until the present time. TABLE 2 - Summary of Historical Use Review Year Source and Scale Comments 1898 and 1906 Topographic Map 1:62,500 No structural development was present on the subject or adjacent property. I-5 was present as well as several rail lines traversing the site vicinity. Sparse small structures and streets were noted in the surrounding area labeled as “Miraflores.” 1935 Topographic Map 1:31,680 Structural development was present adjacent and east of the subject property. Katella Avenue, Lewis Street, and State College Boulevard were present in the site vicinity. Surrounding area appeared with urban development. 1938 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet Subject property, adjacent property and surrounding area appeared with orchards. A rural residence appeared on the central portion of the subject property and adjacent to the east. Other residential development appeared in the surrounding area as well as some commercial development to the south. 1942 Topographic Map 1:62,500 Structures remained in the immediate site vicinity. The subject property and surrounding area appeared shaded green indicating orchards were present. Surrounding area appeared with increased development. 1947 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet No apparent changes were noted on the subject property, adjacent property or in the surrounding area since the 1938 photograph. 1950 Topographic Map 1:24,000 Site vicinity no longer shaded green for orchards. No other changes were noted on the subject property, adjacent property or in the surrounding area. 1953 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet Additional farming structures appeared on (or near) the subject property and to the east. Additional farm structures were noted in the surrounding area. 1965 Topographic Map 1:24,000 Fewer structures were noted near the subject property. Increased development was noted in the surrounding area which also appeared with orchards. 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 TABLE 2 - Summary of Historical Use Review Year Source and Scale Comments 1968 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet Orchards were no longer present on the subject and adjacent properties; however, the property still appeared utilized for agriculture. Residences remained on the subject property and adjacent to the east. Katella Avenue appeared improved and widened. I-5 was present to the west. Commercial development was present on the south side of Katella Avenue as well as to the west along a rail line and I-5. 1972 Topographic Map 1:24,000 No apparent changes were noted to the subject parcel or adjacent and surrounding property since the 1965 topographic map. 1977 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet Subject property appeared with a large structure on the western portion (905-917) and a smaller commercial structure (1105) was present on the southeastern portion of the subject property. The central and northeast portions of the subject property appeared cleared and undeveloped. Adjacent property in all directions appeared with a mix of commercial development and agriculture. 1981 Topographic Map 1:24,000 A large building was on the western portion and a smaller building was on the eastern portion of the subject property. Additional commercial development appeared on the adjacent property in all directions. Surrounding property appeared entirely urbanely developed. 1983 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet Two rectangular buildings (1015-1025) now appeared on the northeast portion of the subject property. The central portion of the subject property was now developed with a parking area and a smaller, narrow, rectangular warehouse building (1005). Commercial development appeared in the site vicinity. 1995 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet No apparent changes were noted to the subject parcel or adjacent and surrounding property since the 1983 photograph. 2002 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet No apparent changes were noted to the subject parcel or adjacent and surrounding property since the 1995 photograph. 2010 Aerial Photograph 1:375 feet No apparent changes were noted to the subject property since the 2002 photograph. The adjacent property to the northeast appeared cleared of its previous structures and vacant. A large area to the southeast of Katella Avenue also appeared cleared and vacant. 2011 Aerial Photograph GoogleEarth The subject property appeared in its current configuration, with a large commercial structure located on the western portion, two rectangular buildings on the northeastern portion and a smaller restaurant building located on the southeast corner. A residential structure appeared adjacent and to the northeast on the formerly vacant property. Surrounding area appeared commercially developed. 3.2.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were developed in the late 1800s and early 1900s for use as an assessment tool for fire insurance rates in urbanized areas. A search was made at the Los Angeles Public Library’s collection of Sanborn Fire Insurance maps. Sanborn map coverage was not available for the subject property indicating little or no development in the site vicinity prior to 1950. In addition, EEI requested a Sanborn map search from Track Info Services/FirstSearch®, an environmental information/database retrieval service. According to Track Info Services, there is no Sanborn map coverage for the area of the subject property (Appendix D, page 115). 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 3.2.3 City/County Directories Directory listings associated with the subject property addresses was obtained from Track Info Services/FirstSearch®, an environmental information/database retrieval service. The earliest listing for any of the subject property addresses was for 1105 East Katella Avenue, which was listed with Mr. Stox Restaurant from 1969 and through 2009. Subject addresses 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue were listed from 1980 through 2009 with various commercial businesses. 1005 East Katella Avenue was not listed in the directories. Subject address 905 East Katella Avenue was listed from 2002 to 2009 with various commercial businesses. Subject addresses 915 and 917 East Katella Avenue were listed from 1992 through 2009 with various commercial businesses. A summary of the listings associated with the subject property address is summarized below in Table 2. A copy of the City Directory Report is provided in Appendix C. One onsite address and one nearby address were listed by Track Info Services with occupants of potential environmental concern. The onsite address, 1015 East Katella Avenue, was occupied with Community Tire of Anaheim in 1992; based on the absence of any permits associated with this address listed on any of the other databases researched, this listing does not appear to be a concern. The nearby site of potential concern was 902 East Katella Avenue (approximately 100 feet to the south), was listed as the site of the Anaheim Unocal 76 in 1992 and 1997. This service station is no longer present, and has not reported a release under the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database; therefore, is not considered an environmental concern. TABLE 3 - Summary of City Directory Search 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025, 1105 East Katella Avenue 2009 902- No listing 905- New Image Office Design 915- JC Corporate Training; LCA; Profsnl Lighthouse 917- No listing 1015- Auto Brite; Kaladar Co.; Telco Electric 1025- Axis Motor Sport; Reeds Irrigation 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1110- Ideal Lease 2002 902- No listing 905- Clear Connection; C. Travis; WC Designs 915- Goldenwest Medical; JC Corporate Training; LCA; PIL 917- M. Brandler 1015- BE Design; Guy Balancing; K Knotts; LJD Ent; Specialty Mach and Fabrication 1025- Amer. Marble and Tile; Greenscape Sys; Imperial Refrig; Jet Medical; Quetzal Cabinets; Reeds Irrigation 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1110- Ideal Lease 1997 914- No listing 905- Addresses not listed 915- B&F Pharm; B. Capeloto; Gateway Medical; Goldenwest Medical; G. Jystad 917- No listing 1015- BE Design; K Knotts; Plexi Fab; World Electric 1025- Ellenas Bread; Greenscape Sys; Imperial Refrig; Reeds Irrigation 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1110- Ideal Lease 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 TABLE 3 - Summary of City Directory Search 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025, 1105 East Katella Avenue 1992 818- No listing 905- Addresses not listed 915- Salem Carpets 917- Whirlpool Fncl 1015- Benchmark Air Sys; Community Tire; Diamond Plastering; Nutritional Road Runner Cmpter 1025- Artisan Draperies; Ellenas Bread; Greenscape Sys; Natl Irrigation; T&M Construction; Zulu Airware 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1110- Rafferty International Trucks, Inc. 1987 818- United Couriers Inc. 905, 915, 917- Addresses not listed 1015- Servicemaster; D-Real Stone Corp; E-AVC Iron Work; G-MR Ent. G-AGC Electronics; J-ZZZZ Best Carpet and Furniture Cleaning 1025- C-Global Roofing; D-Lounge Car Tours; F-National Irrigation; G-Pearcys Woodworking; G-Joseph Fusco and Assoc; J-Telcom Contractors 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1110- Rafferty International Trucks, Inc. 1983 818- United Couriers Inc. 905, 915, 917- Addresses not listed 1015- PAK edm; Smart Closets; Golden Bear Redwood; SFE Machine; The Head Shop; B- Huston Dental Service; C Lundy Medical Products; D Discount Sales; H Simeone Assoc. 1025- Ed’s Ornamental Iron; MTS Construction;’ Basala Fire Fighter; Koenes Electric; Tech Enterprises; National Irrigation Specialists; BNB Ornamental Iron 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1110- Rafferty International Trucks, Inc. 1980 818- United Couriers Inc. 905, 915, 917- Addresses not listed 1015-ABC Four Seasons Inc.; B- Huston Dental Service; C Lundy Medical Products; D Bement Discount Sales; E Simeone Assoc. 1025- Contor Tool Corp.; Rylaur Custom Cabinetry; Ed’s Ornamental Iron; Koenes Electric; Cupcake Floor Covering; A-1 Certification Scv; NICS; BNB Ornamental Iron 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1230- Diagraph of California 1969 and 1974 700- Westside Bldg. Mat. 818- United Couriers Inc. 905, 915, 917, 1015, 1025- Addresses not listed 1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant 1110- International Harvester Company End Of Search due to: A) earlier directory or street listing not found; B) listing out of range, listings re-numbered, or no numeric listings 3.2.4 City of Anaheim Building Department Files EEI researched the City of Anaheim Building Department’s website Property Permit Records database (City of Anaheim, 2012) regarding any building permits or other records associated with the subject property. The following is a summary of the permits on file with the building department for the subject property address run 905 through 1105 East Katella Avenue: 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 917 East Katella Avenue: September 24, 1975: Permit for a new building issued to Sequoia Pacific. April 5, 1978: Permit for addition to existing building issued to Whirlpool Corporation. A986- Letter from the City of Anaheim stating that the building was constructed in two phases, first in 1970 and again in 1978. June 30, 1989: Permit for addition to building issued to Whirlpool Corporation. June 12, 1990: Certificate of Occupancy issued to Salem Carpets (also listed as 919 East Katella Avenue). 1005 through 1015 East Katella Avenue: April 28, 1987: Building permits for a mini-warehouse of 3,696 square feet (1005) issued to Hunco Development Company. 1021 and 1025 East Katella Avenue: June 8, 1978: Demolition permit for a house and garage issued to Hunco Development Company (1021). March 31, 1978: Permit for a multi-tenant industrial building issued to Hunco Development Company (1025). July 18, 1990: Tenant improvement for a bakery issued to Figueroa and Associates. (1025). 1105 East Katella Avenue: December 2, 1966: Restaurant Plan Check issued to Philip McFarland. March 22, 1968: Permit for a restaurant issued to Katella Corporation. March 16, 1971: Permit to enlarge an existing restaurant issued to Harry Fahnstalk. 3.3 Regulatory Database Search EEI reviewed known electronic database listings for possible hazardous waste generating establishments in the vicinity of the subject property, as well as adjacent sites with known environmental concerns. Facilities were identified by county, state, or federal agencies that generate, store, or dispose of hazardous materials. The majority of information in this section was obtained from FirstSearch®, an environmental information/database retrieval service. A copy of the FirstSearch® report is provided in Appendix D, along with a description of the individual databases. The subject property was not listed on any of the databases reviewed as having environmental concerns. For discussion purposes, the term “non-geocoded” is applied to sites that either have non-existent or incomplete addresses. EEI has located these sites, based on the location description provided in the records search. Following is a list of databases that were reviewed in the preparation of this report. 3.3.1 Federal Databases National Priority List (NPL) – No listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject property. NPL Delisted – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) (NFRAP) Archive – One listing was reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. Orange Empire (1000 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), was listed with a status of “No Further Action Planned (NFRAP)” as of 1988. Based on this information, this site is not considered and environmental concern. RCRA Corrective Action Sites (COR) – No listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject property. RCRA TSD Facility List (RCRA-D) – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. RCRA Generators (RCRA-G) – Twenty-one listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject property. Generator permits are not generally rationale for environmental concern, unless a facility has a dual listing, such as a reported release. The following RCRA-G listings: Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet south); Westside Materials aka L.A. Truck Centers (700 East Katella Street, 500 feet southwest); and Ryder Student Bus Service (917 Gene Autry Way, 0.13 miles south), have reported releases and are discussed below under Section 3.3.2 the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. The remaining listings have not documented a release; therefore, these sites are not considered an environmental concern. RCRA No Longer Regulated (NLR) – One listing was reported within a one-eighth mile radius of the subject property. Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), was listed with a status of “No Longer Regulated (NLR)” as of 1996. Based on this information, this site is not considered and environmental concern. Federal Brownfield – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) – Three listings were reported within a one-eighth mile radius of the subject property. All three listings were for Unocal (former) (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street. In general, ERNS listings denote single release events to the surface; however, the aforementioned site has also documented a release to groundwater and is discussed below under Section 3.3.2 the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. The subject property was not identified on any of the above-referenced databases researched. 3.3.2 State and Regional Sources Tribal Lands – No listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject property. One non- geocoded listing was reported: Bureau of Indian Affairs Contact 1 (location unknown). Tribal lands listings are generally not locations or releases, but placeholders used to contact the local Bureau of Indian Affairs representative for information on tribal lands in the area. 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 State/Tribal Sites – Seven listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject property. Two sites were located within a one-quarter mile of the subject property both located 100 feet (0.02 miles) to the south along the north side of East Katella Avenue. : Orange Empire (1000 East Katella Avenue) was assessed as the site of potential contamination by the DTSC in 1988. The DTSC determined that “No Further Action (NFA)” was required for the site. Platinum Triangle (1016 East Katella Avenue) was identified as an agricultural property with orchards, ASTs and USTs. The status of the listing is “inactive-needs action.” Based on the regulatory oversight of the listings; these sites are not considered an environmental concern. Based on the regulatory oversight by Orange County/and or closed status, and distance from the subject property greater than one-quarter mile), the following sites are not considered an environmental concern at this time: Silgan Plastics Corporation (611 East Cerritos Avenue, 0.41 miles northwest); Itasco (2211 East Howell Avenue, 100 feet 0.51 miles northeast); Ponderosa Elementary School (Mountain View and Wilken Way, 0.60 miles southwest); Neville Chemical (2201 East Cerritos Avenue, 0.60 miles northeast); and The City Place North (3745 West Chapman Avenue, 0.95 miles south). State Spills 90 – No listings were reported within a one-eighth mile radius of the subject property. State/Tribal Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) Sites – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. One non-geocoded listing was reported. Upon further review, EEI determined this site to be located greater than one-half mile from the subject property. Therefore, this site is not considered an environmental concern at this time. State/Tribal California State Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) – Twenty (20) listings, two with duplicate listings, were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. Of listings, six sites were located within approximately one-eighth mile of the subject property and are summarized below. EEI reviewed the on-line database GeoTracker, which provides records on LUSTs, maintained by the for more information regarding these cases. The remaining listings were determined to be located greater than one-quarter mile from the subject property and/or have cases which were closed by regulatory agencies; therefore, these sites are not considered a concern. Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) across Katella Avenue); reported a diesel fuel and chlorinated solvent release in August 1996, which reportedly impacted the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in August 2007. According to the case closure summary accessed on GeoTracker, site closure was recommended for various reasons including: contamination being removed excavated and taken off-site for treatment); much of the contamination remaining at the site was localized, minor and shallow; the worst contamination is located below the buildings and structural supports; there is no apparent risk to groundwater, the environment, or public health; the contaminants remaining in soil are in the garage section of the facility and will not likely require a health risk assessment unless the land use changes. According to the report, depth to groundwater was estimated to be approximately 80 feet bgs and the remaining contaminants were not detected below 10 feet. Based on the case closed status and soil only nature of the release case, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern. 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street, reported three gasoline releases, all listed as closed cases, each impacting soil only. A gasoline release was reported in September 1990, which reportedly impacted the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in October 1995. A second release (diesel fuel) was reported in April 2001, which reportedly impacted the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in January 2002. A third release (gasoline) related to the Steve Craig Property was reported at the site in 2004. The release reportedly impacted soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in March 2011. According to the case closure summaries, the cases were closed for various reasons including the following: the source of contamination has been removed; there does not appear to be a threat to public health and a health risk assessment is not required since the site does not involve a change in land use and is currently in operation as a service station; and the concurs with the site closure. The summary stated that there is no apparent threat to groundwater, which occurs in the area at approximately 80 to 100 feet bgs and not contaminants were detected near that depth. Based on the case closed status of these release cases, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern at this time. Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), reported a waste oil and chlorinated solvent release in October 1988, and the case was closed by the OCHCA in February 1990. Based on regulatory oversight, and case closed status of the release, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern at this time. Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street), reported a gasoline release in August 1987, which reportedly impacted the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in August 1998. According to the case closure summary, groundwater contamination does not appear to be an issue, as all samples were non-detect. Eighteen boring confirmed that soil contamination does not extend below 55 feet, while groundwater is found at approximately 80 feet. Based on the regulatory oversight, and case closed status of the release, this site is not considered an environmental concern at this time. Westside Materials aka L.A. Truck Centers (700 East Katella Street, 500 feet southwest), reported a diesel fuel release, which reportedly impacted soil only in October 1987. Remediation was conducted and the case was closed by the City of Anaheim in February 1991. Based on the distance from the subject property and case closed status, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern at this time. Ryder Student Bus Service (917 Gene Autry Way, 0.13 miles south), reported a gasoline fuel release, which reportedly impacted soil only in January 1993. Remediation was conducted and the case was closed by the City of Anaheim in October 1996. Based on the distance from the subject property and case closed status, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern at this time. State/Tribal Permitted Underground Storage Tanks (UST)/Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) – Eight listings (some duplicated) were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. Operational permits are not generally rationale for environmental concern, unless a facility has a dual listing, such as a reported release. Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south); and Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), have both documented releases and are listed under the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. See the LUST section above for further information. 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 State/Tribal IC/EC – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties (VCP) – No listings were reported within a one- quarter mile radius of the subject property. State/Tribal Brownfields – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. State Permits – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. State Other – One listing was reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. State Orange Empire (1000 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), was listed with a status of “No Further Action Planned (NFRAP)” as of 1988. Based on this information, this site is not considered and environmental concern. Federal IC/EC – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. Dry Cleaners – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. Hazardous Waste Manifest – Six listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. Manifest permits are not generally rationale for environmental concern, unless a facility has a dual listing, such as a reported release. Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet south), and Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), have both documented releases and are listed under the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. See the LUST section above for further information. The subject property was not identified on any of the above-referenced databases researched. 3.4 Regulatory Agency Review 3.4.1 City of Anaheim Fire Department EEI contacted the City of Anaheim Fire Department, Fire Prevention Services (AFD), for information pertaining to the subject property. A written request was submitted requesting information on hazardous materials inventories, inspection reports, hazardous waste generating permits, spills, underground and/or above ground storage tanks, CUPA consolidated permits, Investigation Reports/complaints, and/or site remediation plans for the addresses associated with the subject property (905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue). According to a response letter from Patti Rosal-Cary, dated January 17, 2012, no records associated with the subject property were found. Ms. Rosal-Cary noted that information related to underground storage tanks prior to 1991 and Hazardous Waste and on-site treatment records prior to 2001 may be on record with the County of Orange Health Care Agency (see contact below). 3.4.2 City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department EEI contacted the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department for information regarding the presence of any UST permits or records or other tank information associated with the subject property. According to a response on January 23, 2012, from Ms. Jennifer Hall, Records and Information Manager with the department, there are no UST Case Files on record for the subject property address. 13 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 3.4.3 Orange County Health Care Agency – Environmental Health Division EEI reviewed current Orange County Health Care Agency – Environmental Health Division (OCHCA) databases to determine if the subject property or any adjacent or nearby property, within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property was listed as having a potential environmental concern. The following information was reviewed: Hazardous Waste Facilities No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property. Industrial Cleanup Program No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property. Local Oversight Program (LOP) No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property. Non-Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property. Underground Tank Facilities (UTF) No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property. Land Fill Sites No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property. 3.4.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control EEI reviewed the online database EnviroStor (2012), which provides records on LUSTs, SLICs, Priority cleanup sites and states sites, which is maintained by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). No listings were identified on the EnviroStor database for the subject property or any adjacent or nearby property. 3.4.5 State Water Resources Control Board EEI reviewed the online database GeoTracker, maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board 2012), to determine whether the subject property (or any nearby property) was listed as having a leaking underground storage tank (LUST), spill and leak or above-ground tank problem (AST). No listings were identified on the GeoTracker database for the subject property or any adjacent property. Four nearby sites were identified as closed LUST cases. The sites include: Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south across Katella Avenue); Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street); Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet south); and Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south). Based on regulatory oversight, and case closed status of the release, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern at this time. 14 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 3.4.6 Review of Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources Files Oil and gas wells were not observed on the subject property during our subject property reconnaissance. A review of the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Website for oil and gas fields in California and Alaska (CDOGGR, 2012) indicated no petroleum exploration or production has occurred on the subject property (identified as within Township 04 South, Range 10 West, Section 23). 3.4.7 National Pipeline Mapping System In addition, EEI reviewed the National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS, 2012) public viewer website for gas transmission pipelines and hazardous liquid trunk lines on or close to the subject property. According to the information reviewed, no pipelines are located on or in close proximity to the subject property. 3.5 Interview with Current Property Owner EEI contacted Mr. Jonathan M. Brandler, broker and representative of the property owner (Seller) for 905-917 East Katella Avenue, Mr. Travis Rosenbaum, Property Manager for owner Mr. Tom Ewing with See Development for 1005-1025 East Katella Avenue, and Mr. Ron Marshall, owner of 1105 East Katella Avenue, for information regarding the subject property. Mr. Brandler stated that the Seller of 905-917 East Katella Avenue has provided Shopoff Advisors, LP, copies of all environmental investigative reports within the definition of “Due Diligence Documents” set forth in the Purchase Agreement. These reports were in turn provided to EEI by Shopoff Advisors, LP for review. Mr. Rosenbaum also provided EEI with two previous Phase I ESAs conducted for 1005-1025 East Katella Avenue. All of the previous reports provided were reviewed by EEI and documented below in Section 3.7 Previous Assessments. Additional information provided by Mr. Brandler, Mr. Rosenbaum, and Mr. Marshall is documented below. 3.5.1 Past or Present Uses Indicating Environmental Concern Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents, the Seller is not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property. Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he is not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property. Mr. Marshall stated that he is not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property. 3.5.2 Deed Restrictions, Activity or Land Use Restrictions or Environmental Liens Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents, the Seller is not aware of any deed restrictions, activity or land use restrictions, environmental liens, or notification of violations relating to past or recurrent violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or any facility located on the property. 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any deed restrictions, activity or land use restrictions, environmental liens, or notification of violations relating to past or recurrent violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or any facility located on the property. Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any deed restrictions, activity or land use restrictions, environmental liens, or notification of violations relating to past or recurrent violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or any facility located on the property. 3.5.3 Presence of Hazardous Substances or Environmental Violations Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents, the Seller is not aware of any unresolved or current notices of violation pertaining to the use or storage of hazardous substances or petroleum with respect to the property or any facility located on the property. Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any unresolved or current notices of violation pertaining to the use or storage of hazardous substances or petroleum with respect to the property or any facility located on the property. Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any unresolved or current notices of violation pertaining to the use or storage of hazardous substances or petroleum with respect to the property or any facility located on the property. 3.5.4 Environmental Investigations or Cleanups Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents, the Seller is not aware of any environmental investigations or cleanups conducted for the subject property. Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any environmental investigations or cleanups conducted for the subject property. Mr. Marshal stated that he was not aware of any environmental investigations or cleanups conducted for the subject property. 3.5.5 Legal Proceedings Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents, the Seller is not aware of any of any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant on the property. Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any of any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant on the property. Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any of any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant on the property. 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 3.5.6 Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based Paint Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents, the Seller is not aware of any Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based Paint at the subject property. Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead- Based Paint at the subject property. Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based Paint at the subject property. 3.6 User Provided Information Pursuant to ASTM E1527-05, EEI provided a Phase I ESA User Specific Questionnaire to the “user” (the person on whose behalf the Phase I ESA is being conducted), Mr. Brian Rupp, with Shopoff Advisors, LP. The User Specific Information provided by Mr. Rupp is documented below. A list of the user specific questions (per ASTM E1527-05) with Mr. Rupp’s associated responses is included in Appendix E. Mr. Rupp provided EEI with Preliminary Title Reports (PTRs) for each of the subject property parcels (included in Appendix 3.6.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Land Use Limitations Mr. Rupp stated that he is not aware of environmental liens or activity and land use limitations on the subject property. A review of the PTRs associated with each of the subject property parcels confirmed the absence of any environmental liens or land use limitations on the subject property. 3.6.2 Specialized Knowledge Mr. Rupp stated that he has no specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties knowledge of the chemicals or processes used by a type of business). Mr. Rupp noted that the past uses of the subject property were as a warehouse and a restaurant. 3.6.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues Mr. Rupp stated that the purchase price reasonably reflects the fair market value of the subject property. 3.6.4 Presence or Likely Presence of Contamination Mr. Rupp indicated that he is not aware of any specific issues related to spills, releases, or cleanups which may have occurred on the property. 17 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 3.6.5 Other Mr. Rupp noted that the Phase I ESA is a required as a due diligence requirement prior to the acquisition of the subject property. 3.7 Previous Assessments Based on the information provided by the property owner, previous site investigation activities have been conducted on the subject property. The client provided EEI with copies of these reports. The following section summarizes the information EEI reviewed. Environmental Management Group, Inc. (EMG), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated June 2, 1994, Stadium Business Park, 1005-1025 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of lender Provident Companies The Phase I ESA conducted by EMG included the following: Regulatory Database Review, Historical Data Review, Chemical/Hazardous Materials, PCB's, ACM, Operational Activities, AST's, UST's, Surface Areas, and Adjacent Properties. The Phase I ESA determined that the property did not contain facility storage tanks, drums, containers or pipelines (either above or below ground), nor transformers or other equipment containing PCB's in excess of 50 parts per million (ppm). Furthermore, the Phase I ESA concluded that the property did not appear on any of the regulatory databases reviewed, nor was there any historical evidence that the property was ever involved in the generation of hazardous chemicals, or the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous waste. Based on the information obtained during the course of their Phase I ESA, EMG concluded that the property represented a "low-risk scenario", and that no recognized environmental conditions were identified. EMG had no recommendation for further investigation. Eckland consultants, Inc. (ECI), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated September 11, 1995, Stadium Business Park, 1005-1025 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of lender Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S) ECI conducted a Phase I ESA Update for the subject property, which included a regulatory and document review, site observations, interviews, and a review of the previous Phase I ESA conducted in 1994. ECI concluded that the property was essentially in the same condition as encountered in the previous Phase I ESA. ECI found no specific issues of concern related to chemical or hazardous waste storage, tenant activities, waste disposal practices, AST's, UST's, PCB's, asbestos, lead-based paint, surface conditions, or a regulatory database review. Based on the results of their Phase I ESA Update, ECI concluded that no evidence of recognized environmental conditions was identified at the property. No further investigation was recommended. Smith Emery GeoServices. (SEG), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated October 31, 1996, 915-917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of Hill, Farrer and Burrill LLP. The Phase I ESA conducted by SEG included the following: site reconnaissance, drive-by survey, regulatory database review, historical data review, and a summary of geology and hydrology. The property was occupied with a one-story warehouse building of approximately 130,240 square feet in size and associated parking areas. (176,400 total property size). At the time of the report, the warehouse was occupied with five tenants: Whirl Pool, Golden West Medical Center, Orange County Register, WC Designs, and CTS storage and warehousing. The property did not appear on any of the regulatory databases reviewed, nor was there any historical evidence that the property was ever involved in the generation of hazardous chemicals, or the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous waste. SEG concluded that the following items of concern were found during the site 18 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 reconnaissance: 1) a metal dumpster containing oil compressor was noted along the western bound of the property. The oils from the metal container were observed leaking and heavy staining was noted on the concrete surface terminating at a crack in the concrete; and a shed with a 55-gallong drum labeled as containing waste oil and several copper pipes was noted along the western property boundary. Oil was noted in the asphalt pavement directly underneath the shed. Greenish liquid staining was observed between the shed and cracks in the concrete surface. In conclusion, SEG recommended that a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment involving subsurface soil sampling be performed in the aforementioned stained areas to determine if the subsurface soils have been impacted with contaminants. The consultant noted that the onsite building was constructed prior to 1978; therefore, there is potential for the presence of asbestos containing materials and that if the structure was to be demolished or remodeled, a demolition level ACM survey be conducted. Smith Emery GeoServices. (SEG), Report of Environmental Sampling, dated December 4, 1996, 915- 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of Hill, Farrer and Burrill LLP. The above-referenced report performed environmental sampling within two stained areas outside the commercial structure at 915-917 East Katella Avenue, which were identified in the previous Phase I ESA. The purpose of the investigation was to determine if subsurface soils had been impacted due to past site usage. Two borings were hand augered, one in each area of staining, to a depth of five feet bgs. The two areas of staining were located on the west side of the structure and were associated with a metal dumpster and a shed. Soil samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) by EPA Method 418.1, for volatile organics by EPA Method 8240, and for total copper. The results of the analyses performed showed that all constituents analyzed for were below current regulatory actionable limits. SEG stated that it had been their experience that TRPH levels of less than 100 parts per million (ppm) do not require remediation unless so indicated by regulatory agencies. Based on the results of the sampling and chemical analysis, it was SEG’s opinion that no further action was warranted relating to subsurface soils at the site. Centec Engineering (CE), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated September 24, 2010, 905, 915, and 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of 1st Enterprise Bank. The Phase I ESA conducted by CE included the following: site reconnaissance, drive-by survey, regulatory database review, historical data review, interviews and a summary of geology and hydrology. The property consisted of two contiguous rectangular-shaped parcels totaling approximately 8.7 acres developed with a concrete tilt-up light industrial building of approximately 152,280 sf with associated parking and drive areas. At the time of the report, the warehouse was occupied with three tenants: New Image Office Design (905); Joshua Casey Corporate Training and Education (915), and Golden West Medical Center (917). According to the report, the building was constructed in 1973, and Whirlpool Corporation was the original occupant. Whirlpool subdivided the building to accommodate a carpet business called Salem Carpets in approximately 1989. The medical center moved to the property in 1993. In 1993, a business called Excelsior apparently took over a substantial portion of the building from Whirlpool. New Image Office Design has been onsite since at least 2006 and possibly longer. No records reviewed indicated USTs had been in use at the property, or that significant spills or other environmental issues of concern are present. Phase I ESA determined that the property did not appear on any of the regulatory databases reviewed, nor was there any historical evidence of incidents involving hazardous materials, the presence of PCB containing transformers, or current or former USTs or ASTs. The age of the building suggested potential for the presence of asbestos containing materials on the property, but no damaged suspect friable materials were noted onsite. 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 The report stated that hazardous materials were limited to small amounts of cleaners and bio-hazardous wastes generated by the medical clinic. Several adjacent properties across Katella Avenue, and within a mile radius, were listed as known sources of contamination; however, substantial remediation work had taken place at these locations and did not present an imminent risk to the subject property In conclusion, CE stated that the assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with the current or past use of the property. Based on the lack of any known environmental issues or regulatory concerns for the subject property, no further actions were recommended by the consultant. 3.8 Other Environmental Issues 3.8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials Asbestos, a natural fiber used in the manufacturing of a number of different building materials, has been identified as a human carcinogen. Most friable easily broken or crushed) Asbestos- Containing Materials (ACM) were banned in building materials by 1978. By 1989, most major manufacturers had voluntarily removed non-friable ACM flooring, roofing, and mastics/sealants) from the market. These materials, however, were not banned completely. In October 1995, the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) redefined the manner by which building materials are classified in regards to asbestos and the also the way these materials are to be handled. Under this ruling, “thermal system insulation and sprayed-on or troweled on or otherwise applied surfacing materials” applied before 1980 are considered Presumed Asbestos- Containing Materials (PACM). Other building materials such as “floor or ceiling tiles, siding, roofing, transite panels” non-friable) are also considered PACM unless tested. According to the information reviewed, structures on the subject property were built prior to 1978. Therefore, the presence of asbestos-containing materials is likely. EEI recommends ACM testing of building materials prior to improvements or demolition activities. 3.8.2 Lead-Based Paint Lead-Based Paint (LBP) is identified by OSHA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) as being a potential health risk to humans, particularly children, based upon its effects to the central nervous system, kidneys, and bloodstream. The risk of Lead-Based Paint has been classified by HUD based upon the age and condition of the painted surface. This classification includes the following:  maximum risk is from paint applied before 1950  a severe risk is present from paint applied before 1960  a moderate risk is present from paint applied before 1970  a slight risk is present from paint applied before 1977  paint applied after 1977 is not expected to contain lead According to the information reviewed, structures on the subject property were built prior to 1978. Therefore, the presence of lead based paint is likely. EEI recommends lead-based paint testing of building materials prior to improvements or demolition activities. 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 3.8.3 Radon Radon is a radioactive gas which has been identified as a human carcinogen. Radon gas is typically associated with fine-grained rock and soil, and results from the radioactive decay of radium. The U.S. EPA recommends that homeowners in areas with radon screening levels greater than 4 Picocurries per liter (pCi/L) conduct mitigation of radon gas to reduce exposure. Sections 307 and 309 of the Indoor Radon Abatement Act of 1988 (IRAA) directed the U.S. EPA to list and identify areas of the U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. U.S. EPA’s Map of Radon Zones (EPA-402-R-93-071) assigns each of the 3,141 counties in the US to one of three zones based on radon potential: • Zone 1 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level greater than 4 pCi/L. • Zone 2 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level between 2 and 4 pCi/L. • Zone 3 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level less than 2 pCi/L. Based on such factors as indoor radon measurements, geology, aerial radioactivity, and soil permeability; the U.S. EPA has identified EPA has identified Orange County as Zone 3 low potential for radon gas). EEI does not consider radon as a significant environmental concern at this time. 3.8.4 Biphenyls Biphenyls (PCB’s) are used in electrical equipment, particularly in capacitors and transformers, because they are electrically nonconductive and stable at high temperatures. PCB’s persist in the environment, accumulate in organisms, and concentrate in the food chain. The disposal of these compounds is regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA, 1976), which banned the manufacture and distribution of PCB’s. By Federal definition, PCB equipment contains 500 parts per million (ppm) or more of PCB’s, where PCB-contaminated equipment contains PCB concentrations greater than 50 ppm but less than 500 ppm. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under TSCA guidance, regulates the removal and disposal of all sources of PCB’s containing 50 ppm or more. Any electrical equipment containing dielectric insulating fluids or coolants, manufactured prior to 1976, should be considered as potentially PCB-containing. This includes transformers, capacitors, and fluorescent light fittings. In addition, PCB’s may also be found as a stabilizer in older lubricating oils, pesticide extenders, cutting oils, hydraulic fluids (i.e. like those likely present within the hydraulic lifts on the subject property), paints, sealants, and flame retardants (UNEP, 1999). Also, due to the age of the some of the structures (pre-1978) on the subject property, the structures may contain older fluorescent lighting mounts and/or interior electrical transformers. Older lighting fixtures and/or electrical transformers may contain small amounts of PCBs, and should be evaluated prior to removal. 21 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 4.1 Purpose The purpose of our site reconnaissance was to physically observe the subject site, site structures, and adjoining properties for conditions indicating an existing release, past release, or threatened release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the subject site, or into soil and/or groundwater beneath the subject property. This would include any evidence of contamination, distressed vegetation, petroleum-hydrocarbon surface staining, waste drums, USTs, ASTs, illegal dumping, or improper waste storage/handling. Detailed information pertaining to our site reconnaissance is provided in the text below. 4.2 Subject Site On January 18, 2012, EEI personnel conducted a site reconnaissance to visually observe the subject site and adjoining properties for conditions indicating a potential recognized environmental concern. Concerns would include any evidence of contamination, distressed vegetation, petroleum-hydrocarbon staining, waste drums, illegal dumping, or improper waste storage and/or handling. Visual conditions present during the site reconnaissance are documented in the Photographic Log (Appendix and summarized in Table 3. The subject property encompasses approximately 13-acres on four parcels. The subject property is occupied with 4 commercial buildings identified as: 905 and 915 E Katella (APN 082-261-23); 917 E Katella (APN 082-261-24) Part of same large building as 905/915; 1005, 1015 and 1025 E Katella (APN 082-261-27); and 1105 E Katella (APN 082-261-28). EEI inspected each of the onsite buildings and a summary is provided below: 905-917 East Katella EEI was accompanied by Steve Schloemer of Colliers International, agent for owner, whom provided access to all areas and rooms of the building. The building consists of 174,795 square feet, and is occupied with the following tenants: New Image Office Design (located in northwest corner and west-central portions of building) is a modular office furniture sales and installation business. This area included mainly warehouse space used for product storage Golden West Medical (located on the ground floor in the south central portion along Katella Avenue) – is a 24-hour urgent care center with physical therapy and ongoing treatment for some cases. A mezzanine floor, located directly above Golden West medical, is currently used for storage and conference rooms, but was formerly occupied by Joshua Casey, a safety training/seminar provider. Evriholder Products (located in the southeastern corner and east central portion of building) - imports low- cost "impulse" items for sale in bulk to retailers such as Wal-Mart and Kmart, etc. Items are stored in boxes stacked in the warehouse. The area also includes minor office space used mostly for shipping/receiving. Tandem Design (and sub tenant Terra Tile) (northeast corner of the building) - transports, and assembles display booths used by various clients for trade shows and conventions. Terra tiles stores and sells ceramic tiles. 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 No evidence of significant hazardous materials or hazardous waste storage was noted. Small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning products were noted in tenant spaces occupied by New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products. In addition these two tenants had forklifts operated by either propane or electricity (battery). Small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste were noted at Golden West Medical. 1005, 1015 and 1025 (also 1005 - nine-unit storage building) EEI was accompanied by Travis Rosenbaum, property manager for owner Ewing Enterprises (aka See Development). Building 1005, a nine-unit storage building was not accessible, and housed miscellaneous storage. Building 1015, Suites C and G, and building 1025, Suites C, D, F, and G, were accessed, and consisted of two multi-tenant office buildings (single-story) with rear warehouse space and rollup doors facing an interior driveway/alley. The two buildings are essentially identical (mirror image). Building 1015 has six tenants including uses such as cross-fit training (Al Amato), Electrical contracting (Telco Electric), printer/copier repair (Digitech business solutions), and general storage (Infinity rental, Western Dental Service, and Perfect One). Building 1025 has eight tenants including uses such as custom auto parts and accessories (RBR Motorsports), off road repair and parts (Axxis Motorsports), General construction (O C & C Construction), concrete cutting (Pro Cut) and general storage (Brooks Totlebensmith, Arsh Imports, and Elizabeth Bellara). One tenant, Christopher Beliovsky, conducts repairs and refurbishes his personal automobiles in his suite. Minor quantities of cleaning products, lubricants, and or paint were noted in all of the suites visited, in addition, small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, as well as used tires, were noted in suites occupied by Axxis Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsky. In general, housekeeping was adequate to good, with no evidence of significant spillage/leakage, or significant accumulation of waste. All interiors of the suites were paved with concrete, minimizing concerns in that regard. 1105 East Katella Avenue EEI was accompanied by the property owner Mr. Ron Marshall, who has owned the property since 1977. The Mr. Stox Restaurant has occupied the address since approximately 1969. EEI accessed all areas of the building. The restaurant building consists of large dining areas, lounges, and an exterior patio lounge. The kitchen and refrigeration area is located in the rear of the building. A wine cellar built into floor plan is located at ground level, while the remaining portions of the building were constructed with a raised floor. With the exception of the minor chemical storage described above, no evidence of contamination, distressed vegetation, petroleum-hydrocarbon surface staining, waste drums, USTs, ASTs, illegal dumping, or improper waste storage/handling, was noted during the site reconnaissance. 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 TABLE 4 - Summary of Site Reconnaissance Item Concerns Comments General Housekeeping No No concerns observed. Surface Spills No No concerns observed. Stained Surfaces No No concerns observed. Fill Materials No No concerns observed. Pits/Ponds/ Lagoons No No concerns observed. Surface Impoundments No No concerns observed. ASTs/USTs No No concerns observed. Distressed Vegetation No No concerns observed. Wetlands No No concerns observed. Electrical Substations No No concerns observed. Areas of Dumping No No concerns observed. Transformers No No concerns observed. Waste/Scrap Storage No No concerns observed. Chemical Use/Storage No 905-917-Small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning products; propane or electric batteries (New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products); small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste (Golden West Medical); 1015-1025- Minor quantities of cleaning products, lubricants, and or paint were noted in all of the suites; small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, and used tires (Axxis Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsky). 4.3 Adjacent Properties The subject property is generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties to in all directions. It is immediately bound by Omni Duct (1700 South Lewis Street) to the north, East Katella Avenue to the south, a vacant lot and residential property to the east, and South Lewis Street to the west. A former gas station (Former Unocal -1818 South Lewis Street) is located to the southwest at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street. None of the adjacent properties were identified as having environmental related issues on any of the databases researched. Several nearby sites have reported releases and are discussed under Section 3.3 Regulatory Database Search. Based on various reasons, theses sites are not considered an environmental concern. 24 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 5.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS Based on the information obtained in this ESA, EEI has the following findings and opinions: • Known or suspected REC’s – No known or suspected REC’s have been revealed during the preparation of this ESA.  Historical REC’s – No historical REC’s have been revealed during the preparation of this ESA.  De Minimis Conditions – The following de minimis condition has been revealed during the preparation of this ESA. EEI observed small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning products; propane/electric batteries in the New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products suites, and small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste in the Golden West Medical suite in building 905-917 East Katella Avenue. Small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, and used tires were observed in the Axxis Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsk suites. Minor quantities of cleaning products, lubricants, and or paint were noted in all of the suites in building 1015-1025 East Katella Avenue 6.0 DATA GAPS Section 3.2.20 (ASTM 1527-05) defines a data gap as “a lack or inability to obtain information required by the practice despite good faith efforts of the environmental professional to gather such information.” 6.1 Historical Data Gaps Based on the information obtained during the course of this investigation, no historical data gaps were encountered. 6.2 Regulatory Data Gaps Based on the information obtained during the course of this investigation, no regulatory data gaps were encountered. 6.3 Onsite Data Gaps Based on the information obtained during the course of this investigation, no onsite data gaps were encountered. 6.4 Deviations from ASTM Practice Section 12.10 (ASTM 1527-05), states that all deletions and deviations from this practice shall be listed individually and in detail, including client imposed constraints, and all additions should be listed. EEI believes that there are no exceptions to, or deletions from, the ASTM Designation E1527-05 Guidelines. 25 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 7.0 CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Designation E1527-05 at the subject property located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue, City of Anaheim, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 6.0 of this report. This Phase I ESA has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 27 8.0 REFERENCES California Department of Water Resources, Water Data Library (WDL), Website (http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary), accessed January 2012. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces, Note 36, dated May 27. California State Water Resources Control Board, California Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region, Water Quality Control Plan - Santa Ana River Basin 1995. City of Anaheim, General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report, No. 330, SCH #[PHONE REDACTED], May 25, 2004. http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=1626 Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC), Website (http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/), EnviroStor database, accessed January 2012. Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Website http://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/FemaWelcomeView?storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&langId=-1 accessed January 2012. Google Earth®, 2012, Version 6.0. Orange County Water District (OCWD), 1982, Talbert Barrier Status Report, July 1979-June 1982, dated November 1982. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board 1995, Water Quality Control Plan – Santa Ana River Basin Region 8: California State Water Resources Control Board Publication. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 1998, Faults in California - Los Angeles Region. State Water Resources Control Board, Website, GeoTracker database accessed January 2012. United Nations Environmental Programme, 1999, Guidelines for the Identification of PCBs and Materials Containing PCBs. United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service, 1978, Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, California. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1981, 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, Anaheim, California Quadrangle, scale 1:24,000. ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 FIGURES ---PAGE BREAK--- 0 Scale: 1" = 1,700' Note All Locations Are Approximate FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP Commercial Property 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28 Anaheim, California 92805 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Created February 2012 1,700FT 3,400FT 1,020FT SITE LOCATION Map Source: USGS Anaheim, California 7.5 Minute Quadrangle map (USGS, 1981) ---PAGE BREAK--- 0 Scale: 1" = 400' Note All Locations Are Approximate FIGURE 2 AERIAL SITE MAP SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP Commercial Property 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28 Anaheim, California 92805 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Created February 2012 400 FT 800 FT 240 FT Map Source: Google Earth®, Image Date: March 7, 2011 SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY Omni Duct Vacant Vacant Residential Light Industrial Former Gas Station 905 - 917 1005 1015 1025 1105 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 APPENDIX A RESUME OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL ---PAGE BREAK--- BERNARD A. SENTIANIN, CPG, RG, REA PRINCIPAL GEOLOGIST SUMMARY As Principal Geologist of EEI since 1997, Mr. Sentianin provides consulting and technical services as a project manager, expert witness, and senior geologist for investigation and cleanup efforts at sites impacted by Petroleum Hydrocarbons, heavy metals, pesticides, and chlorinated solvents. As a remediation specialist, he has hands on experience designing, installing, and managing large scale projects involving above ground and in-situ bioremediation, soil vapor extraction, sparging, and groundwater extraction/treatment. He has over 22 years of environmental project management experience, and 25 years professional geologic experience. Mr. Sentianin has extensive experience in planning, implementing and evaluating Phase I and Phase II environmental assessments in commercial real estate transactions following ASTM E1527-05, E1903-97 E2600-10, and 40 CFR Part 312 (AAI). EDUCATION 1985 Bachelor of Science, Geology, California State University, Bakersfield 1989 Master of Science, Geological Sciences, San Diego State University REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS Registered Environmental Assessor I No. 3477, State of California. Professional Geologist No. 5530, State of California. Certified Professional Geologist No. 9059, American Institute of Professional Geologists OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training and 8-Hour Refreshers WORK HISTORY 1991 TO 1997 Senior Geologist, Senior Project Manager PW ENVIRONMENTAL Established in-house engineering and consulting services for mid-sized environmental contractor. Established regulatory, vendor, and client contacts. Initiated policies governing technical report content and format and instituted in- house training program for new technical staff. Selected prioritized and procured required support equipment. Actively managed Phase I and Phase II investigation and remediation projects. Reviewed assessment data, prepared feasibility studies, and evaluated remedial alternatives while preparing Remedial Action Plans (RAP) for fuel, heavy metal, and solvent-impacted sites. Prepared health-based risk assessment on large cleanup site adjacent to health care facility. Permitted, implemented, and successfully completed the first in-situ groundwater bioremediation system in Ventura County. Reviewed and implemented numerous Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments throughout Central and Southern California. ---PAGE BREAK--- 1989 TO 1991 STAFF/Project Geologist NACHANT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Planned, implemented, and managed environmental site investigations and remediation projects following appropriate regulatory and professional guidelines. Prepared and reviewed project cost proposals, correspondence, regulatory permits, assessment and investigation reports, and remedial action plans. 1987 TO 1989 TEACHING ASSISTANT SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY – DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Globe Mills, Sacramento CA - Conducted Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment, evaluated environmental concerns for adaptive reuse project on behalf of Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency. Managed and coordinated site cleanup, obtaining regulatory closure from the Sacramento County Environmental Management Division. K Street Corridor – Sacramento, CA. Evaluated and conducted Phase I environmental site assessments on a multi-block area of downtown Sacramento, as well as a number of individual properties in other areas within the K Street Corridor, on behalf of the City of Sacramento Downtown Development Group. Southside Garden and Fremont Mews, Sacramento, CA – Conducted Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessments and evaluated environmental concerns on three community garden projects on behalf of the Capitol Area Development Authority. Coordinated regulatory oversight with Sacramento County Environmental Management Division and the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Prepared an SAP and facilitated compliance with a Brownfield Grant from EPA Region 9. Prepared and evaluated RFP’s from cleanup contractors and provided remediation oversight and management. Prepared closure documentation and obtained regulatory concurrence for both the Southside Garden and Fremont Mews projects. Electronics Manufacturing Facility/Fueling Depot, Santa Monica, CA. Performed soil and groundwater investigation, feasibility testing and evaluation of fuel hydrocarbon and chlorinated solvent plumes. Prepared RAP with design criteria for soil vapor extraction. After approval of RAP by State regulators, implemented and successfully completed remediation at site, obtaining closure. Former Aerospace Facility, Santa Ana, CA. Evaluated existing Phase I and Phase II assessments. Performed soil, soil vapor, and groundwater investigations of chlorinated solvent plumes at multiple locations on site. Modeled and evaluated potential plume source areas. Initiated site specific sampling protocol for chlorinated solvents. Negotiated with lead regulatory agency regarding regional contamination issues and site closure requirements. Major Land Owner/Developer, San Juan Capistrano, CA. Conducted Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments at multiple sites in southern Orange County. Evaluated potential environmental concerns related to sand & gravel operations, fueling facilities, ordinance testing facilities, aerospace engineering labs, vehicle maintenance and repair facilities, agricultural operations, and illicit dump sites. Major Fast Food Restaurant Chain, Multiple Locations, CA. Conducted Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments at multiple sites throughout California. Evaluated potential environmental concerns related to historic property uses and potential effects on site operations. ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com ISSUING OFFICE: 1300 Dove Street, Suite 310 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 [PHONE REDACTED] • FAX Call for Fax PRELIMINARY REPORT Title Officer: David James Title No.: 11-725142114-DJ Locate No.: CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] TO: Colliers-Seeley One Park Plaza, Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92614 ATTN: Stephen Schloemer PROPERTY ADDRESS: 905 and 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EFFECTIVE DATE: November 22, 2011, 07:30 A.M. The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A FEE as to Parcel(s) A1 and B1; AN EASEMENT more fully described below as to Parcel(s) A2 and B2 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: K/L ANAHEIM PROPERTIES I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels A-1 and A-2 and K/L ANAHEIM PROPERTIES II LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels B-1 and B-2 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF MH\MH 12/07/2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 2 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A-1: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SAID GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING ABOVE 500 FEET, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, RECORDED September 28, 1973 IN BOOK 10921, PAGE 428 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL A-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL B-1: PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY GRANTED HEREIN OR ANY PART THEREOF LYING BETWEEN SAID SURFACE AND FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW SAID SURFACE, AS SET FORTH IN DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, RECORDED December 23, 1977 IN BOOK 12506, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. APN: 082-261-23,24 ---PAGE BREAK--- Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 3 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2011-2012, Assessor’s Parcel Number 082-261-23. Code Area Number: 01007 1st Installment: $55,355.69 OPEN 2nd Installment: $55,355.69 OPEN Land: $1,096,224.00 Improvements: $2,947,579.00 Exemption: $0.00 Personal Property: $0.00 2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2011-2012, Assessor’s Parcel Number 082-261-24. Code Area Number: 01007 1st Installment: $33,136.52 OPEN 2nd Installment: $33,136.52 OPEN Land: $1,081,975.00 Improvements: $1,465,695.00 Exemption: $0.00 Personal Property: $0.00 3. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of California. 4. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records. 5. The use and control of cienegas and natural streams of water, if any, naturally upon, flowing across, into or by the herein described land, and the right of way for and to construct irrigation or drainage ditches through said land to irrigate or drain adjacent lands, as reserved in the deed from Stearns Ranchos Company to G.W. Bissett, recorded July 27, 1895 in Book 87, Page 269 of Deeds. 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document. Granted to: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a partnership composed of Golden Empire Investment Corporation, a corporation and Birren Corporation, a corporation, partners Purpose: Sideyard clearance Recorded: September 28, 1973, Instrument No. 24842, of Official Records Affects: As set forth in said instrument ---PAGE BREAK--- ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 4 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document. Granted to: City of Anaheim Purpose: The installation, maintenance of underground electrical cables, related equipment Recorded: December 26, 1973, Book 11039, Page 854, of Official Records Affects: A portion of Parcel A-1 8. Covenants, conditions and restrictions in the declaration of restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law. Recorded: December 23, 1977, Book 12506, Page 82, of Official Records Affects: Parcel B-1 9. A covenant and agreement entitled "Covenant and Agreement" Executed by: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a general partnership; David E. Sanford; Julius Fligelman; Harvey Cooper and Mark Ross In favor of: City of Anaheim Recorded: April 4, 1978, Book 12621, Page 1581, of Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon any future owners, encumbrancers, their successors or assigns, and shall continue in effect until the advisory agency approves termination. Affects: Parcel A-1 10. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Party Wall Agreement and Grant of Easement" dated December 14, 1978, executed by and between Sequoia Pacific Realco, David E. Sanford, Julius Fligelman and Molly Fligelman as trustees of the Julius Fligelman and Molly Fligelman Revocable Trust, Harvey Cooper Mark Ross recorded December 29, 1978, Book 12981, Page 1109, of Official Records. Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. ---PAGE BREAK--- ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 5 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) 11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document. Granted to: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a California general partnership Purpose: Access to utilities Recorded: December 29, 1978, Book 12981, Page 1144, of Official Records Affects: A portion of Parcel A-1 12. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Covenant Not To Contest" dated June 13, 2008, executed by and between K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company recorded June 17, 2008, Instrument No. 2008000289659, of Official Records. Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 13. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Development Agreement No. 2008-00002" dated June 24, 2008, executed by and between The City of Anaheim, K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company recorded July 23, 2008, Instrument No. 2008000351778, of Official Records. Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 14. The effect of a "Notice of Special Tax Lien-City of Anaheim Community Facilities District No. 08-1 (Platinum Triangle)" recorded August 12, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008000383751, of Official Records of Orange County, State of California. 15. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby Amount: $2,000,000.00 Dated: November 10, 2010 Trustor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels A-1 and A-2 and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels B-1 and B-2 Trustee: Fidelity National Title Company Beneficiary: 1st Enterprise Bank Loan No.: Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636878, of Official Records 16. An assignment of all moneys due, or to become due as rental or otherwise from said land, to secure payment of an indebtedness, shown below and upon the terms and conditions therein Amount: $2,000,000.00 Assigned to: 1rst Enterprise Bank By: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels A-1 and A-2 and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels B-1 and B-2 Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636879, of Official Records ---PAGE BREAK--- ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 6 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) 17. An instrument entitled "Hazardous Substances Certificate and Indemnity Agreement" recorded November 29, 2010 as Instrument/File No. 2010000636880 of Official Records. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 18. An unrecorded lease with certain terms, covenants, conditions and provisions set forth therein as disclosed by the document Entitled: Subordination, Non-Disturbance and Attornment Agreement and Estoppel Certificate Lessor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC Lessee: Gary Jystad, M.D. Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636881, of Official Records The present ownership of the leasehold created by said lease and other matters affecting the interest of the lessee are not shown herein. An agreement (and the provisions contained therein) which states that said lease is subordinate to the Deed of Trust Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636878, of Official Records By document Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636881, of Official Records 19. A financing statement filed in the Office of the County Recorder, showing Debtor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC Secured Party: 1rst Enterprise Bank Date: None Shown Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636882, of Official Records 20. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. 21. Any easements not disclosed by those public records which impart constructive notice as to matters affecting title to real property and which are not visible and apparent from an inspection of the surface of said land. ---PAGE BREAK--- ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 7 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) 22. Any rights of the parties in possession of a portion of, or all of, said land, which rights are not disclosed by the public record. This Company will require, for review, a full and complete copy of any unrecorded agreement, contract, license and/or lease, together with all supplements, assignments and amendments thereto, before issuing any policy of title insurance without excepting this item from coverage. The Company reserves the right to except additional items and/or make additional requirements after reviewing said documents. 23. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, this Company will require for review, the following documents from the Limited Liability Company named below. Limited Liability Company: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company A copy of its operating agreement and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. Confirmation that its Articles of Organization (LLC-1), and Certificate of Amendment (LLC-2), any restated Articles of Organization (LLC-10) and/or Certificate of Correction (LLC-11) have been filed with the Secretary of State. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member. If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it was validly formed, is in good standing and authorized to do business in the state of origin. If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it has complied with California "doing business" laws, if applicable. After review of the requested documents, the Company reserves the right to add additional items or make additional requirements prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance. ---PAGE BREAK--- ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 8 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) 24. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, this Company will require for review, the following documents from the Limited Liability Company named below. Limited Liability Company: K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company A copy of its operating agreement and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. Confirmation that its Articles of Organization (LLC-1), and Certificate of Amendment (LLC-2), any restated Articles of Organization (LLC-10) and/or Certificate of Correction (LLC-11) have been filed with the Secretary of State. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member. If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it was validly formed, is in good standing and authorized to do business in the state of origin. If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it has complied with California "doing business" laws, if applicable. After review of the requested documents, the Company reserves the right to add additional items or make additional requirements prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance. 25. This company will require a statement of information from the parties named below in order to complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees, or other matters which do not specifically describe said land, but which, if any do exist, may affect the title or impose liens or encumbrances thereon. After review of the requested Statement(s) of Information the Company may have additional requirements before the issuance of any policy of title insurance. Parties: All parties (Note: The statement of information is necessary to complete the search and examination of title under this order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only, and having a completed statement of information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which appear to involve the parties but in fact affect another party with the same or similar name. Be assured that the statement of information is essential and will be kept strictly confidential to this file). 26. The transaction contemplated in connection with this Report is subject to the review and approval of the Company's Corporate Underwriting Department. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after such review. END OF ITEMS ---PAGE BREAK--- Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 9 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Note 1. The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach the CLTA Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said land commercial improvements known as 905 & 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy. Note 2. There are NO deeds affecting said land, recorded within twenty-four (24) months of the date of this report. Note 3. If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real estate agent or association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold face type and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 4. Wiring instructions for Fidelity National Title Company, Riverside, CA, are as follows: Receiving Bank: Union Bank of California (800) 849-6466 Irvine, CA 92614 ABA Routing No.: 122000496 Credit Account Name: Fidelity National Title Company - Major Accounts Payoff/Admin 11870 Pierce St. Suite 100, Riverside, CA 92505 Credit Account No.: [PHONE REDACTED] Reference No.: 11-725142114 These wiring instructions are for this specific transaction involving the Title Department of the Newport Beach office of Fidelity National Title Company. These instructions therefore should not be used in other transactions without first verifying the information with our accounting department. It is imperative that the wire text be exactly as indicated. Any extraneous information may cause unnecessary delays in confirming the receipt of funds. Note 5. Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report. ---PAGE BREAK--- NOTES: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 10 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) OWNER'S DECLARATION The undersigned hereby declares as follows: 1. (Fill in the applicable paragraph and strike the other) a. Declarant ("Owner") is the owner or lessee, as the case may be, of certain premises located at further described as follows: See Preliminary Report/Commitment No. for full legal description (the "Land"). b. Declarant is the of ("Owner"), which is the owner or lessee, as the case may be, of certain premises located at further described as follows: See Preliminary Report/Commitment No. for full legal description (the "Land"). 2. (Fill in the applicable paragraph and strike the other.) a. During the period of six months immediately preceding the date of this declaration no work has been done, no surveys or architectural or engineering plans have been prepared, and no materials have been furnished in connection with the erection, equipment, repair, protection or removal of any building or other structure on the Land or in connection with the improvement of the Land in any manner whatsoever. b. During the period of six months immediately preceding the date of this declaration certain work has been done and materials furnished in connection with upon the Land in the approximate total sum of but no work whatever remains to be done and no materials remain to be furnished to complete the construction in full compliance with the plans and specifications, nor are there any unpaid bills incurred for labor and materials used in making such improvements or repairs upon the Land, or for the services of architects, surveyors or engineers, except as follows: Owner, by the undersigned Declarant, agrees to and does hereby indemnify and hold harmless Fidelity National Title Insurance Company against any and all claims arising therefrom. 3. Owner has not previously conveyed the Land; is not a debtor in bankruptcy (and if a partnership, the general partner thereof is not a debtor in bankruptcy); and has not received notice of any pending court action affecting the title to the Land. 4. Except as shown in the above-referenced Preliminary Report/Commitment, there are no unpaid or unsatisfied mortgages, deeds of trust, Uniform Commercial Code financing statements, claims of lien, special assessments, or taxes that constitute a lien against the Land or that affect the Land but have not been recorded in the public records. 5. The Land is currently in use as occupy/occupies the Land; and the following are all of the leases or other occupancy rights affecting the Land: 6. There are no other persons or entities that assert an ownership interest in the Land, nor are there unrecorded easements, claims of easement, or boundary disputes that affect the Land. 7. There are no outstanding options to purchase or rights of first refusal affecting the Land. ---PAGE BREAK--- NOTES: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-[PHONE REDACTED] 11 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) This declaration is made with the intention that Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (the "Company") and its policy issuing agents will rely upon it in issuing their title insurance policies and endorsements. Owner, by the undersigned Declarant, agrees to indemnify the Company against loss or damage (including attorneys fees, expenses, and costs) incurred by the Company as a result of any untrue statement made herein. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on at Signature: END OF NOTES ---PAGE BREAK--- Chicago Title Company Builders Services Division 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-3400 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 1 Title Department: Escrow Department: Chicago Title Company Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] & [EMAIL REDACTED] Phone: (619) 521-3553 & (619) 521-3555 Fax: (619) 521-3608 Order No.: 930023912-U50 Chicago Title Company Attn: Lorri Beasley Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Phone: (949) 724-3114 Fax: (949) 724-3186 Reference No.: 128200004-M19 FIRST AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT Property Address: 1005 East Katella, Anaheim, CA Dated as of: January 12, 2012 at 7:30 am In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner’s Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023912-U50 SCHEDULE A CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 2 1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A fee 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: See Development limited partnership, a California limited partnership 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Orange and is described in the Legal Description, attached hereto: END OF SCHEDULE A ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023912-U50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 3 PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APN 082-261-27 END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023912-U50 SCHEDULE B CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 4 At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: 1. Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2012 - 2013 that are a lien not yet due. 2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2011 - 2012 1st Installment: $20,751.09 (Paid) 2nd Installment: $20,751.09 Penalty and Cost: $2,098.10 (Due after April 10) Homeowners Exemption: $none Code Area: 01007 Assessors Parcel Number: 082-261-27 3. The property included within this subdivision is subject to annual assessments (commonly referred to as Mello-Roos assessments) to pay the installation and maintenance cost of improvements and are currently being collected with the property taxes. a) ANA EL 2002 BOND 05 b) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 02 c) ANAH EL 2010,SR 2011 d) NOCCD 2002 BOND2005R e) ANA EL 2002 BOND2007 f) NOCCD 2002 BOND 2003 g) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 03 h) NOCCD 2002 BND 2002A i) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 06 j) ANAHEIM CITY 1980 BD k) ANA EL 2002 BOND2004 4. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Part 0.5, Chapter 3.5 or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4 respectively (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A; or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to date of policy. 5. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 6. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document. Granted to: City of Anaheim Purpose: installation and maintenance of a water fireline assembly Recorded: November 28, 1978 in book 12939, page 1457 of Official Records ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023912-U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 5 Affects: That portion of said land more particularly described therein 7. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby Amount: $2,325,000.00 Dated: June 30, 2004 Trustor: See Development Limited Partnership, a California Limited Partnership Trustee: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, a Canadian Corporation Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613523 of Official Records 8. An assignment Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613524 of official records of certain of the lessor’s interests under leases referred therein, which assignment recites, among other things, that it is given as additional security for the Deed of Trust Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613523 of official records 9. Intentionally omitted. 10. A document entitled “Development Agreement No. 2007-00002”, executed by City of Anaheim, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation and Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Trust, the Marshall Family Trust and See Development Limited Partnership, subject to all the terms, provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded March 20, 2008 as instrument no. 2008- 129034 of Official Records. 11. An assessment for the District shown below. District: City of Anaheim Community Facilities District no. 08-1 (Platinum Triangle) Disclosed By: District map Recorded: February 4, 2008 as File No. 2008000051133, Official Records A document entitled “Notice of Special Tax Lien” pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the Mello-Roos Community Facility Act of 1982 recorded August 8, 2008 as File No. 2008000383751, Official Records. ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023912-U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 6 12. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage. 13. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases. This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements, assignments, and amendments for review. END OF SCHEDULE B ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023912-U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 7 0: Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage. Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Note No. 3: The requirement that a copy of the partnership agreement of the See Development limited partnership, a California limited partnership be furnished to this Company, together with all supplements, amendments, etc., thereto. Note No. 4: Your open order request indicates that a Limited Liability Company will be acquiring, encumbering or conveying real property in your transaction. Under the provisions of “the California Limited Liability Act, effective September 30, 1994” the following will be required: 1. A copy of the Articles of Organization (and all amendments, if any) that has been filed with the Secretary of State. 2. The requirement that this Company be provided with a copy of the Operation Agreement. The copy provided must be certified by the appropriate manager or member that it is a copy of the current operating agreement. 3. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed then this Company must be provided with a current list of the member names. Note No. 5: Plotted easements ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023912-U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 8 ATTACHMENT ONE PRIVACY STATEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION: For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions From Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this information by selecting the link. For those of you who are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copy of this information has been submitted for your review. ---PAGE BREAK--- CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Privacy Statement (10-21-03) Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies’ Privacy Statement July 1, 2001 We recognize and respect the privacy of today’s consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information (”Personal Information”), and to whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:  From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;  From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates or others;  From our Internet web sites;  From the public records maintained by government entities that we wither obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others; and  From consumer or other reporting agencies Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Information We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes. Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal Information:  to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested;  to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf; and  to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest. In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when your direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such documents may contain your Personal Information. Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. All requests must be made in writing to the following address: Privacy Compliance Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Drive Jacksonville, FL 32204 Multiple Products or Services: If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more that one privacy notice from us. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 10 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: • land use • improvements on the land • land division • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking 3. Title Risks: • that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you • that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date – unless they appeared in the public records • that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date – this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lack of a right: • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A OR • in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. In addition to the Exclusions you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the expenses resulting from: 1. Any right, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. 3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land, whether or not shown by the public records. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. SCHEDULE B, PART I EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the public records. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 11 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: to timely record the instrument of transfer; or of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the public records. 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 12 resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing- business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; Proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the Public Records. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: to timely record the instrument of transfer; or of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the public records. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 13 2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown by the Public Records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the Public Records. CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations concerning: a. building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on the Land e. Land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, 17 or 24. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 14 LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: • For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Our Maximum Dollar Your Deductible Amount Limit of Liability Covered Risk 14: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 15: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 (whichever is less) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that s notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7, 8(e) and 26. 7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the existence of which are Known to the Insured at: The time of the advance; or The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of Interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at Date of Policy. ---PAGE BREAK--- (continued) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 15 You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts. If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction, you do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow or title services in this transaction. If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is subject of your current transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount. Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is required to determine if you qualify for a discount which is subject to other terms and conditions. ---PAGE BREAK--- (continued) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- Chicago Title Company Builders Services Division 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-3400 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 1 Title Department: Escrow Department: Chicago Title Company Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] & [EMAIL REDACTED] Phone: (619) 521-3553 & (619) 521-3555 Fax: (619) 521-3608 Order No.: 930023837-U50 Chicago Title Company Attn: Lorri Beasley Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Phone: (949) 724-3114 Fax: (949) 724-3186 Reference No.: 118200342 FIRST AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT Property Address: 1105 Katella Avenue East, Anaheim, CA Dated as of: January 19, 2012 at 7:30 am In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner’s Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023837-U50 SCHEDULE A CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 2 1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A Fee 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Ronald M. Marshall, trustee and Deborah L. Marshall, trustee of the Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Revocable Trust, dated January 7, 1989, an undivided 1/2 interest and to the Marshall Family Trust, dated February 14, 2000, an undivided 1/2 interest, Charles B. Marshall and Susan M. Marshall, trustees Vesting Deed: August 07, 2001 as Instrument No. 2001-0540746. 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Orange and is described in the Legal Description, attached hereto: END OF SCHEDULE A ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023837-U50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 3 PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. APN 082-261-28 END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023837-U50 SCHEDULE B CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 4 At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: 1. Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2012 - 2013 that are a lien not yet due. 1A. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2011 - 2012 1st Installment: $24,216.61 (Paid) 2nd Installment: $24,216.61 Penalty and Cost: $2,444.66 (Due after April 10) Homeowners Exemption: $none Code Area: 01007 Assessors Parcel Number: 082-261-28 2. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Part 0.5, Chapter 3.5 or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4 respectively (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A; or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to date of policy. 3. The property included within this subdivision is subject to annual assessments (commonly referred to as Mello-Roos assessments) to pay the installation and maintenance cost of improvements and are currently being collected with the property taxes. a) ANA EL 2002 BOND 05 b) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 02 c) ANAH EL 2010,SR 2011 d) NOCCD 2002 BOND2005R e) ANA EL 2002 BOND2007 f) NOCCD 2002 BOND 2003 g) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 03 h) NOCCD 2002 BND 2002A i) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 06 j) ANAHEIM CITY 1980 BD k) ANA EL 2002 BOND2004 4. The use and control of cienegas and natural streams of water, if any, naturally upon, flowing across, into or by the herein described land, and the right of way for and to construct irrigation or drainage ditches through said land to irrigate or drain adjacent lands, as provided in deed(s). Recorded: June 4, 1919 in Book 332 Page 362 of Deeds ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023837-U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 5 5. A document entitled “Memorandum Of Purchase Agreement And Escrow Instructions”, dated January 29, 2007 executed by Ronald W. Marshall, and Deborah L. Marshall, Co-Trustees of the Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Revocable Trust, dated January 7, 1989;and Charles B. Marshall and Susan M. Marshall Co-Trustees of the Marshall Family Trust, dated February 14, 2000 and Integral Partners, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, subject to all the terms, provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded February 2, 2007 as instrument number 2007-72414, Official Records. 6. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following facts disclosed by an ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey, dated as of February 6, 2006, prepared by or under the direction of Rory S. Williams, LS 6654, for Hunsaker and Associates, Irvine, Inc., : Job no. 2873-4 A. there is a block wall straddling a portion of the east line of parcel 2. B. two building overhangs encroach .10 and .40 feet onto parcel 2 from the east adjoiner. C an aluminum storage area overhang encroaches .10 feet into parcel 2 from the east adjoiner. D an aluminum storage area overhang encroaches .50 feet into the east adjoiner from parcel 2. E. a fence on parcel 1projecting from the east face of the building on parcel 2 shown as 1105 East Katella Avenue encroaches an undisclosed distance onto the east adjoiner. F. utility wires between a pole in katella avenue and a building on the east adjoiner overhang parcel 2 near the southeast corner thereof. 7. A document entitled “Development Agreement No. 2007-00002”, subject to all the terms, provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded March 20, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008- 129034 Official Records. 7A. An assessment for the District shown below. District: City of Anaheim Community Facilities District no. 08-1 (Platinum Triangle) Disclosed By: District map Recorded: February 4, 2008 as File No. 2008000051133, Official Records A document entitled “Notice of Special Tax Lien” pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the Mello-Roos Community Facility Act of 1982 recorded August 8, 2008 as File No. 2008000383751, Official Records. 8. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023837-U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 6 9. Any easements not disclosed by those public records which impart constructive notice and which are not visible and apparent from an inspection of the surface of said land. 10. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage. 11. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases. This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements, assignments, and amendments for review. END OF SCHEDULE B ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023837-U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 7 0: Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage. Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Note No. 3: If title is to be insured in the Trustee(s) of a Trust, (or if their act is to be insured), this Company will require a copy of the Trust Agreement including all exhibits listing real and personal property transferred into the Trust together with complete copies of any amendments or modifications thereto. The Company must also be furnished with a verification of all present Trustees stating that the copy being furnished is a true and correct copy of the entire Trust Agreement including all modifications or amendments; that the Trust is currently in full force and effect; and that it has not been revoked or terminated. Note No. 4: The requirement that a copy of the partnership agreement of the Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership be furnished to this Company, together with all supplements, amendments, etc., thereto. Note No. 5: We find no open Deeds of Trust of record. Please verify by inquiry of your escrow personnel and or agents whether or not we have overlooked something and advise the title department accordingly prior to closing. ---PAGE BREAK--- Order No.: 930023837-U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Page 8 ATTACHMENT ONE PRIVACY STATEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION: For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions From Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this information by selecting the link. For those of you who are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copy of this information has been submitted for your review. ---PAGE BREAK--- CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Privacy Statement (10-21-03) Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies’ Privacy Statement July 1, 2001 We recognize and respect the privacy of today’s consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information (”Personal Information”), and to whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:  From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;  From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates or others;  From our Internet web sites;  From the public records maintained by government entities that we wither obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others; and  From consumer or other reporting agencies Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Information We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes. Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal Information:  to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested;  to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf; and  to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest. In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when your direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such documents may contain your Personal Information. Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. All requests must be made in writing to the following address: Privacy Compliance Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Drive Jacksonville, FL 32204 Multiple Products or Services: If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more that one privacy notice from us. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 10 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: • land use • improvements on the land • land division • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking 3. Title Risks: • that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you • that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date – unless they appeared in the public records • that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date – this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lack of a right: • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A OR • in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. In addition to the Exclusions you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the expenses resulting from: 1. Any right, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. 3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land, whether or not shown by the public records. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. SCHEDULE B, PART I EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the public records. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 11 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: to timely record the instrument of transfer; or of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the public records. 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 12 resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing- business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; Proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the Public Records. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: to timely record the instrument of transfer; or of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the public records. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 13 2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown by the Public Records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under or are shown by the Public Records. CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations concerning: a. building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on the Land e. Land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, 17 or 24. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 14 LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: • For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Our Maximum Dollar Your Deductible Amount Limit of Liability Covered Risk 14: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 15: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 (whichever is less) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that s notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7, 8(e) and 26. 7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the existence of which are Known to the Insured at: The time of the advance; or The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of Interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at Date of Policy. ---PAGE BREAK--- (continued) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 15 You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts. If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction, you do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow or title services in this transaction. If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is subject of your current transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount. Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is required to determine if you qualify for a discount which is subject to other terms and conditions. ---PAGE BREAK--- (continued) Attachment One (11-17-06) Page 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 APPENDIX C HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS/ TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS/CITY DIRECTORY SEARCH ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Track Info Services City Directory Report DISCLAIMER The information contained in this report has been obtained from publicly available sources and other secondary sources of information produced by entities other than Track Info Services, LLC (Track Info Services). Although great care has been taken by Track Info Services in compiling and checking the information contained in this report to insure it is current and accurate, Track Info Services disclaims any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. The data provided hereunder neither purports to be nor constitutes legal or medical advice. It is further understood that Track Info Services makes no responsibility with respect to our customer's, its employees', clients', or customers' use thereof. Track Info Services shall not be liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting in whole or in part, from customers' use of the data. Liability on the part of Track Info Services, LLC (Track Info Services) is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. The report is valid only for the geographical parameters specified on the cover page of this report, and any alteration or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report does not constitute a legal or licensed opinion. Prepared for: Bernie Sentianin – EEI Client Job No/Name: SHO 71418.1 TIS Log No: 68493 Subject Property: 905, 915, 917, 1015, 1025, 1105 E Katella Ave Anaheim, CA 92805 January 17, 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 2 of 7 Addresses of Potential Concern: A summary of gas stations, cleaners, automotive shops, and other address occupants of potential environmental concern located on the subject street, within the vicinity of the target address. The addresses listed are included in the body of the report. YEAR ADDRESS OCCUPANT 1997 902 E Katella Ave Anaheim Unocal 76 1992 902 E Katella Ave 1015 E Katella Ave Anaheim Unocal 76 Comnty Tire Anaheim No additional Addresses of Potential Concern identified on the subject street, within vicinity of the Target address. ---PAGE BREAK--- Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 3 of 7 905, 915, 917, 1015, 1025, 1105 E Katella Ave 2009 Haines: North Orange County p. 324 2002 Haines: North Orange County p. 340 ---PAGE BREAK--- Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 4 of 7 1997 Haines: North Orange County p. 272 1992 Haines: North Orange County p. 205 ---PAGE BREAK--- Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 5 of 7 1987 Pacific Telephone: Orange County North p. 38 1983 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 38 ---PAGE BREAK--- Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 6 of 7 1980 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 40 1974 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 38 1969 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 30 End Of Search due to: A) earlier directory or street listing not found; B) listing out of range, listings re-numbered, or no numeric listings ---PAGE BREAK--- Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 7 of 7 Notes: ƒ Subject Property is in bold, the next lowest address on the same side of the street is to the left and the next highest address on the same side of the street is to the right. ƒ The next lowest and highest addresses are the closest listed for the same side of the street as the target and may or may not be adjacent. They are the closest listed in the source consulted. ƒ Occupant names and statements such as 'Vacant', 'No info' and 'Under constr' are verbatim. ƒ Occupant names are listed once per address although they may be listed multiple times in the directory. ƒ A forward slash between names indicates multiple companies listed under same main company. ƒ Previous refers to source and entries listed above what is being read. ƒ The source used is cited in the row above referenced address and occupant. ƒ Entries in italics are research notes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 APPENDIX D ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SEARCH ---PAGE BREAK--- FirstSearch Technology Corporation TM Environmental FirstSearch Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 Job Number: SHO-71418.1 PREPARED FOR: EEI 2195 Faraday Ave., Suite K Carlsbad, CA 92008 01-11-12 Tel: (781) 551-0470 Fax: (781) 551-0471 Environmental FirstSearch is a registered trademark of FirstSearch Technology Corporation. All rights reserved. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Search Summary Report Target Site: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 FirstSearch Summary Notice of Disclaimer Waiver of Liability - Continued on next page - Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS NPL Y 10-25-11 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NPL Delisted Y 10-25-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 CERCLIS Y 09-30-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 NFRAP Y 09-30-11 0.50 0 1 0 0 - 0 1 RCRA COR ACT Y 09-13-11 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA TSD Y 09-13-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 RCRA GEN Y 09-13-11 0.25 0 8 13 - - 0 21 RCRA NLR Y 09-13-11 0.12 0 1 - - - 0 1 Federal Brownfield Y 12-01-11 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 ERNS Y 10-18-11 0.12 0 3 - - - 0 3 Tribal Lands Y 12-01-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 State/Tribal Sites Y 07-14-11 1.00 0 2 0 0 5 0 7 State Spills 90 Y 09-28-11 0.12 0 0 - - - 0 0 State/Tribal SWL Y 01-10-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 1 1 State/Tribal LUST Y 09-28-11 0.50 0 6 2 12 - 0 20 State/Tribal UST/AST Y 06-13-11 0.25 0 5 3 - - 0 8 State/Tribal EC Y NA 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 State/Tribal IC Y 06-01-11 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 State/Tribal VCP Y 07-14-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 State/Tribal Brownfields Y NA 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 Releases Y 10-18-11 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 State Permits Y 09-28-11 0.12 0 0 - - - 0 0 State Other Y 07-14-11 0.25 0 1 0 - - 0 1 Oil & Gas Wells Y 01-08-01 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 Federal IC/EC Y 11-01-11 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 Dry Cleaners Y NA 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 HW Manifest Y 08-02-10 0.12 0 6 - - - 0 6 -TOTALS- 0 33 18 12 5 2 70 Due to the limitations, constraints, and inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch Technology Corp., certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency sites residing in FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such information. Although FirstSearch Technology Corp. uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, FirstSearch Technology Corp. does not and can not warrant the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an understanding of FirstSeaarch Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Search Summary Report Target Site: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 FirstSearch Summary Notice of Disclaimer Waiver of Liability Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS Due to the limitations, constraints, and inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch Technology Corp., certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency sites residing in FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such information. Although FirstSearch Technology Corp. uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, FirstSearch Technology Corp. does not and can not warrant the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an understanding of FirstSeaarch Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Information Report Request Date: 01-11-12 Search Type: COORD Requestor Name: BERNIE SENTIANIN Job Number: SHO-71418.1 Standard: ASTM-05 Filtered Report Target Site: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 Demographics Sites: 70 Non-Geocoded: 2 Population: NA Radon: NA Fire Insurance Map Coverage: No Site Location Degrees (Decimal) Degrees (Min/Sec) UTMs Longitude: -117.896559 -117:53:48 Easting: 417011.431 Latitude: 33.803781 33:48:14 Northing: 3740567.389 Elevation: 146 Zone: 11 Comment Comment: Additional Requests/Services Adjacent ZIP Codes: Services: ZIP Code City Name ST Dist/Dir Sel Requested? Date Fire Insurance Maps No Aerial Photographs Yes 01-11-12 Historical Topos Yes 01-11-12 City Directories Yes 01-11-12 Title Search No Municipal Reports No Liens No Historic Map Works No Online Topos No ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Target Site Summary Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 TOTAL: 70 GEOCODED: 68 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 No sites found for target address Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 TOTAL: 70 GEOCODED: 68 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. 1 NFRAP ORANGE EMPIRE 1000 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 1 1 CAD049903271/NFRAP-N ANAHEIM CA 92805 1 RCRAGN ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING 1000 E KATELLA ST 0.07 SW - 1 2 CAD049903271/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 1 STATE ORANGE EMPIRE 1000 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 1 3 CAL30330009/REFER: OTHER AGENCY ANAHEIM CA 92805 1 OTHER ORANGE EMPIRE 1000 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 1 4 CAL30330009/REFER: OTHER AGENCY ANAHEIM CA 92805 2 RCRAGN PACIFIC BELL 901 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 2 5 CAD980735583/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 3 RCRANLR WESTRUX INTL 1110 E KATELLA 0.07 SE 0 6 CAD983639527/NLR ANAHEIM CA 92805 3 UST WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1110 KATELLA 0.07 SE 0 8 TISID-STATE34355/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 3 LUST WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1110 KATELLA AVE 0.07 SE 0 9 T0605901993/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 4 ERNS UNOCAL 1818 S LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 10 182188/FIXED FACILITY ANAHEIM CA 92805 4 ERNS UNOCAL UNOCAL SS#8800 1818 SO. LE 0.08 SW - 2 11 186030/ ANAHEIM CA 92805 4 ERNS UNOCAL 1818 S LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 12 465925/UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK ANAHEIM CA 92805 4 UST TOSCO 1818 S LEWIS 0.08 SW - 2 13 ANAHIEM12209/ ANAHEIM CA 4 UST UNOCAL (SS 8800) 1818 LEWIS 0.08 SW - 2 14 TISID-STATE34204/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 4 LUST STEVE CRAIG PROPERTY 1818 S LEWIS 0.08 SW - 2 15 T0605983677/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92806 4 LUST TOSCO - 76 STATION #8800 1818 LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 16 T0605901266/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 4 LUST TOSCO/76 SS #8800 1818 S LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 17 T060590323/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 5 RCRAGN GESTETNER CORP 1212 E KATELLA AVE 0.09 SE 0 18 CAD981679194/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92803 6 UST ACTION RENTALS INC 1822 LEWIS 0.10 SW - 2 20 TISID-STATE7221/INACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 6 HWMANIFE C C MYERS INC 1822 S LEWIS RD 0.10 SW - 2 21 CAL000258530/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 7 RCRAGN GESTETNER CORP 1290 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE 0 22 CAD981678659/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 TOTAL: 70 GEOCODED: 68 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. 8 RCRAGN JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 24 CAD981981020/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 8 RCRAGN JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 26 CAD981386469/TRANSPORTER ANAHEIM CA 92805 8 STATE PLATINUM TRIANGLE 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 28 CAL60001110/INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED ANAHEIM CA 92805 8 LUST JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 KATELLA 0.11 SE - 1 30 T0605900867/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92803 8 HWMANIFE TEST AMERICA DRILLING CORP 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 31 CAL000264848/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 9 LUST TEXACO SERVICE STATION 818 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SW - 2 32 T0605900569/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92801 9 HWMANIFE TEXACO #211247 818 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SW - 2 33 CAL000254200/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 10 RCRAGN CLUTCH CO 1832 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 2 34 CA0000435925/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 10 HWMANIFE FASTEEL CORPORATION 1832 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 2 36 CAL000324599/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 11 RCRAGN JOBBER MACHINE 1836 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 2 37 CAD981980477/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 12 UST GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION 1700 S LEWIS ST 0.12 NW + 1 38 TISID-STATE7219/INACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92825 12 HWMANIFE OMMI DUCT SYSTEMS 1700 S LEWIS ST 0.12 NW + 1 39 CAL000212088/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 13 HWMANIFE L & B CONNECTING ROD 1830 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 3 40 CAL000257128/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 14 RCRAGN NATIONAL CRANKSHAFT CO 1848 S LEWIS ST 0.16 SW - 4 41 CAD982496390/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 15 RCRAGN LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS LLC 700 E KATELLA AVE 0.19 SW - 2 43 CAR000016774/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 15 LUST WESTSIDE MATERIALS 700 E KATELLA AVE 0.19 SW - 2 45 T0605900518/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 16 RCRAGN ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ANAHEIM PRI 1701 S LEWIS ST 0.19 NW + 1 46 CAD982438715/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 17 RCRAGN GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC 1140 E HOWELL AVE 0.20 NE + 4 48 CAR000065656/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 18 RCRAGN MALCO SERVICES 1865 S SANTA CRUZ 0.20 SE - 2 50 CAR000053223/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 19 RCRAGN ORANGE COUNTY MICROFILM INC 1456 E KATELLA 0.20 SE + 1 52 CAD982509358/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 TOTAL: 70 GEOCODED: 68 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. 20 RCRAGN PACIFIC IMAGE 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE 0.20 SW - 3 53 CA0000047258/LGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 20 RCRAGN PACIFIC IMAGE, INC 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE 0.20 SW - 3 55 CAO000047258/LGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 21 RCRAGN AIRPORT COACH 917 E GENE AUTRY WAY 0.21 SW - 4 57 CAD983657537/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 21 RCRAGN RYDER STUDENT TRANS 917 PACIFICO AVE 0.21 SW - 4 59 CAD982048316/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 21 UST RYDER STUDENT TRANS CO 917 PACIFICO AVE 0.21 SW - 4 61 TISID-STATE34120/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 21 LUST RYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE 917 E GENE AUTRY WAY 0.21 SW - 4 62 T0605901626/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 22 RCRAGN LIFE FLEET 1890 S BETMOR LN 0.21 SE - 2 63 CA0000133082/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 23 RCRAGN ORANGE COUNTY AUTO 620 E KATELLA AVE 0.21 SW - 1 65 CAD983588161/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 24 RCRAGN MER CEDES SHOP THE 1884 S SANTA CRUZ 0.22 SE - 3 67 CAD983588153/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805 25 UST SCOTTS INDEPENDENT 1885 S SANTA CRUZ 0.22 SE - 3 69 ANAHIEMNA5/ ANAHEIM CA 25 UST SCOTTS INDEPENDENT PORSCHE 1885 SANTA CRUZ 0.22 SE - 3 70 TISID-STATE34184/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 26 LUST JOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL 1858 ANAHEIM WAY 0.26 SW - 4 71 T0605901679/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 27 LUST WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL 1111 HOWELL AVENUE E. 0.27 NE + 4 72 T0605974729/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 27 LUST WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS 1111 HOWELL AVE 0.27 NE + 4 73 T0605901991/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92802 28 LUST WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL 1213 HOWELL AVENUE E. 0.29 NE + 4 74 T0605906599/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 29 LUST COORS DISRIBUTING COMPANY 1625 S LEWIS ST 0.31 NW + 3 75 T060599039/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92802 30 LUST DANA EDWARDS 1901 S MANCHESTER AVE 0.32 SW - 6 76 T0605900745/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92802 31 LUST NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. 1500 E BABBITT AVE 0.37 NE + 9 77 T0605900234/OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT ANAHEIM CA 92805 32 LUST ARCO #6220 1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 0.39 SE + 3 80 T0605900941/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 33 LUST DEL PISO BRICK COMPANY 1635 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 0.45 NE + 10 81 T0605900097/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92806 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 TOTAL: 70 GEOCODED: 68 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. 34 LUST CERTRON 1701 STATE COLLEGE 0.46 NE + 10 82 T0605900725/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805 35 LUST TOSCO CORPORATION SITE 1515 LEWIS 0.46 NW + 7 83 T0605999297/LEAK BEING CONFIRMED ANAHEIM CA 92805 36 LUST UNOCAL 2001 KATELLA 0.48 SE + 6 84 T0605900918/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92801 37 STATE SILGAN PLASTICS CORPORATION 611 E CERRITOS AVE 0.60 NW + 5 85 CAL30300130/REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY ANAHEIM CA 92805 38 STATE ITASCO 2211 E HOWELL AVE 0.67 NE + 10 86 CAL30280129/REFER: ANAHEIM CA 92804 39 STATE PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE/WILKE 0.79 SW - 14 88 CAL30880003/NO FURTHER ACTION ANAHEIM CA 92805 40 STATE NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY 2201 E CERRITOS AVE 0.83 NE + 17 90 CAL30280120/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92806 41 STATE THE CITY PLACE NORTH 3745 W CHAPMAN AVE 1.00 SE - 14 92 CAL30000017/REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY ORANGE CA 92868 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 TOTAL: 70 GEOCODED: 68 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. SWL ANAHEIM CITY DUMP #7 SW OF SANTA ANA RIVER AND NON GC N/A N/A SWIS30-CR-0109/CLOSED ANAHEIM CA TRIBALLA BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTACT I UNKNOWN NON GC N/A N/A BIA-92805/ CA 92805 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 NFRAP SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SW ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 1 NAME: ORANGE EMPIRE REV: 9/30/11 ADDRESS: 1000 E KATELLA ID1: CAD049903271 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: 0900449 ORANGE STATUS: NFRAP-N CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 1 DESCRIPTION: ACTION/QUALITY AGENCY/RPS START/RAA END ARCHIVE SITE EPA In-House 11/14/1988 DISCOVERY State, Fund Financed 12/1/1987 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT State, Fund Financed 11/14/1988 NFRAP: NO FURTHER REMEDIAL ACTION PLANNED ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 18 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SW ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 1 NAME: ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1000 E KATELLA ST ID1: CAD049903271 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 2 SITE INFORMATION OWNER NAME: DOWNEY HEAT TREATING COMPANY OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1000 E KATELLA ST ANAHEIM, CA UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION 331 - PRIMARY METAL MANUFACTURING ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 29 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SW ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 1 NAME: ORANGE EMPIRE REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 1000 E KATELLA ID1: CAL30330009 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: HISTORICAL ORANGE STATUS: REFER: OTHER AGENCY CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 3 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: Historical Status: Refer: Other Agency Status Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Project Manager: Supervisor: * MMONROY Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contaminants: * UNSPECIFIED AQUEOUS SOLUTION Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: * CERC2 OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) LEONARDO MARBLE CAD049903271 30330009 COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: * Discovery Completion Date: 1981-09-01 00:00:00 Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED PHONE BOOK SEARCH (1971) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Screening Completion Date: 1994-10-28 00:00:00 Comments: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completion Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00 Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE HISTORICAL RECORDS DO NOT INDICATE FAC WAS A PROBLEM Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Screening Completion Date: 1987-05-21 00:00:00 Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 OTHER SEARCH ID: 34 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SW ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 1 NAME: ORANGE EMPIRE REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 1000 E KATELLA ID1: CAL30330009 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: REFER: OTHER AGENCY CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 4 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: Historical Status: Refer: Other Agency Status Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Project Manager: Supervisor: * MMONROY Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contaminants: * UNSPECIFIED AQUEOUS SOLUTION Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: * CERC2 OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) LEONARDO MARBLE CAD049903271 30330009 COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Screening Completion Date: 1994-10-28 00:00:00 Comments: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completion Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00 Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE HISTORICAL RECORDS DO NOT INDICATE FAC WAS A PROBLEM Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Screening Completion Date: 1987-05-21 00:00:00 Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: * Discovery Completion Date: 1981-09-01 00:00:00 Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED PHONE BOOK SEARCH (1971) ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 19 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 2 NAME: PACIFIC BELL REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 901 E KATELLA ID1: CAD980735583 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 5 SITE INFORMATION OWNER NAME: OWNER TYPE: OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1854 N NEVILLE ORANGE, CA 92665 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRANLR SEARCH ID: 23 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 3 NAME: WESTRUX INTL REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1110 E KATELLA ID1: CAD983639527 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: NLR CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 6 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: MG MOWREY 15555 VALLEY VIEW AVE SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 90670 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: WESTRUX INTL OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: OPERATOR_TYPE: MAILING ADDRESS: 1110 E KATELLA ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 11/30/1996 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: N INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRANLR SEARCH ID: 23 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 3 NAME: WESTRUX INTL REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1110 E KATELLA ID1: CAD983639527 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: NLR CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 7 - ALL OTHER BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 42 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 3 NAME: WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 1110 KATELLA ID1: TISID-STATE34355 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 8 UST HISTORICAL DATA This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were never included. The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board That agency no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997. Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards. Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 58 DIST/DIR: 0.07 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 3 NAME: WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1110 KATELLA AVE ID1: T0605901993 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 9 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002915T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 2007-08-17 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1997-04-25 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-08-17 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-11-13 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): * No Action ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-08-16 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-11-18 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Unauthorized Release Form ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ERNS SEARCH ID: 24 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: UNOCAL REV: 9/19/90 ADDRESS: 1818 S LEWIS ST ID1: 182188 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: FIXED FACILITY CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 10 SPILL INFORMATION DATE OF SPILL: 9/19/1990 TIME OF SPILL: 1100 PRODUCT RELEASED GASOLINE: AUTOMOTIVE (4.23G PB/G QUANTITY 0 UNITS UNK PRODUCT RELEASED QUANTITY UNITS PRODUCT RELEASED QUANTITY UNITS MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTED AIR: NO GROUNDWATER: YES LAND: NO FIXED FACILITY: NO WATER: NO OTHER: NO WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: SOIL CAUSE OF RELEASE DUMPING: NO EQUIPMENT FAILURE: NO NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATOR ERROR: NO OTHER CAUSE: NO TRANSP. ACCIDENT: NO UNKNOWN: NO ACTIONS TAKEN: SOIL EXCAVATED. RELEASE DETECTION: BELOWGROUND STORAGE TANK/CONTAMINATED SOIL DISCOVERED DURING TANK EXCAVATION MISC. NOTES: DISCHARGER INFORMATION DISCHARGER ID: 182188 DUN & BRADSTREET TYPE OF DISCHARGER: PRIVATE ENTERPRISE NAME OF DISCHARGER: UNOCAL ADDRESS: 2190 EAST TOWN CENTER PLC ANAHEIM CA 92806 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ERNS SEARCH ID: 25 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: UNOCAL REV: 9/19/90 0: ADDRESS: UNOCAL SS#8800 1818 SO. LEWIS ST ID1: 186030 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 11 SPILL INFORMATION DATE OF SPILL: 9/19/1990 TIME OF SPILL: 1100 PRODUCT RELEASED GASOLINE QUANTITY 0 UNITS UNK PRODUCT RELEASED QUANTITY UNITS PRODUCT RELEASED QUANTITY UNITS MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTED AIR: NO GROUNDWATER: NO LAND: YES FIXED FACILITY: NO WATER: NO OTHER: NO WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: NONE CAUSE OF RELEASE DUMPING: NO EQUIPMENT FAILURE: YES NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATOR ERROR: NO OTHER CAUSE: NO TRANSP. ACCIDENT: NO UNKNOWN: NO ACTIONS TAKEN: SOIL REMOVED BY UNOCAL (RP) RELEASE DETECTION: CONTAMINATED SOIL FOUND DURING REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK. MISC. NOTES: DISCHARGER INFORMATION DISCHARGER ID: 186030 DUN & BRADSTREET TYPE OF DISCHARGER: PRIVATE CITIZEN NAME OF DISCHARGER: UNOCAL ADDRESS: 2190 E. TOWN CENTER ANAHEIM CA 92806- ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ERNS SEARCH ID: 26 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: UNOCAL REV: 9/19/90 ADDRESS: 1818 S LEWIS ST ID1: 465925 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 12 SPILL INFORMATION DATE OF SPILL: 9/19/1990 TIME OF SPILL: 1100 PRODUCT RELEASED GASOLINE: AUTOMOTIVE (4.23G PB/G QUANTITY 0 UNITS UNK PRODUCT RELEASED QUANTITY UNITS PRODUCT RELEASED QUANTITY UNITS MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTED AIR: NO GROUNDWATER: NO LAND: YES FIXED FACILITY: NO WATER: NO OTHER: NO WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: SOIL CAUSE OF RELEASE DUMPING: NO EQUIPMENT FAILURE: NO NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATOR ERROR: NO OTHER CAUSE: YES TRANSP. ACCIDENT: NO UNKNOWN: NO ACTIONS TAKEN: SOIL EXCAVATED. RELEASE DETECTION: BELOWGROUND STORAGE TANK/CONTAMINATED SOIL DISCOVERED DURING TANK EXCAVATION MISC. NOTES: DISCHARGER INFORMATION DISCHARGER ID: 465925 DUN & BRADSTREET TYPE OF DISCHARGER: PRIVATE ENTERPRISE NAME OF DISCHARGER: UNOCAL ADDRESS: 2190 EAST TOWN CENTER PLC ANAHEIM CA 92806- ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 40 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: TOSCO REV: 05/24/2000 ADDRESS: 1818 S LEWIS ID1: ANAHIEM12209 ANAHEIM CA ID2: ORANGE STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 13 ANAHEIM CERTIFIED & NON COMPLIANT TANKS LIST INFORMATION According to the Anaheim Fire Dept. the following information is current as of 03/17/03 Certified Petroleum Tanks: 3 Non Petroleum Tanks: Waste Tanks: 1 Non Petroleum Tank Contents: WASTE OIL Comments: Certificate Number: 12209 Date Certificate Issued: 2/1/98 Number of Tags Issued: 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 41 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: UNOCAL (SS 8800) REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 1818 LEWIS ID1: TISID-STATE34204 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 14 UST HISTORICAL DATA This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were never included. The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board That agency no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997. Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards. Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 52 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: STEVE CRAIG PROPERTY REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1818 S LEWIS ID1: T0605983677 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 15 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083004021T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 2011-03-09 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2011-03-09 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-04-14 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Letter - Notice ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-06-18 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Letter - Notice ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 54 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: TOSCO - 76 STATION #8800 REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1818 LEWIS ST ID1: T0605901266 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 16 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001680T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 90UT209 CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1995-10-09 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1995-10-09 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 56 DIST/DIR: 0.08 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 4 NAME: TOSCO/76 SS #8800 REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1818 S LEWIS ST ID1: T060590323 ANAHEIM CA ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 17 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083003827T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 2002-01-16 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-01-16 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 4 DIST/DIR: 0.09 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 5 NAME: GESTETNER CORP REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1212 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981679194 ANAHEIM CA 92803 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 18 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER 1212 E KAYELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92803 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: HANOVER REAL ESTATE OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1212 E KATELLA AVE ANEHEIM, CA 92803 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 09/26/1986 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: O-OTHER SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 4 DIST/DIR: 0.09 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 5 NAME: GESTETNER CORP REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1212 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981679194 ANAHEIM CA 92803 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 19 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 35 DIST/DIR: 0.10 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 6 NAME: ACTION RENTALS INC REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 1822 LEWIS ID1: TISID-STATE7221 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: INACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 20 UST HISTORICAL DATA This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were never included. The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board That agency no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997. Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards. Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 HWMANIFEST SEARCH ID: 63 DIST/DIR: 0.10 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 6 NAME: C C MYERS INC REV: 02/19/10 ADDRESS: 1822 S LEWIS RD ID1: CAL000258530 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 21 DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 5 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 7 NAME: GESTETNER CORP REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1290 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981678659 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 22 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER 1290 E KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: HANOVER REAL ESTATE OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1290 E KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 09/26/1986 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 5 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 146 MAP ID: 7 NAME: GESTETNER CORP REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1290 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981678659 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 23 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 7 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981981020 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 24 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER 1016 E KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: W JAYCOX TRUST OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 04/06/1987 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 7 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981981020 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 25 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 8 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981386469 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: TRANSPORTER CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 26 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER 1016 E KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 90805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: R RANGEL OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: P O BOX 4468 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 02/11/1986 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: N INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: O-OTHER SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: Y - YES TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 8 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD981386469 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: TRANSPORTER CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 27 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 30 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: PLATINUM TRIANGLE REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAL60001110 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: SCHOOL ORANGE STATUS: INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 28 - Continued on next page - GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: School Investigation Status: Inactive - Action Required Status Date: 2009-10-23 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: School District Regulatory Agencies Involved: Lead Agency: Project Manager: CHRISTINE CHIU Supervisor: Shahir Haddad Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: 3.76 Assessor s Parcel Number: 083-751-01, 083-751-14, 083-751-15, 375-381-34, 375-381-35 Past Uses: ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, AGRICULTURAL - ORCHARD, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION - WAREHOUSING Potential Contaminants: 30018 30022 30027 30484 Confirmed Contaminants: 30022 30484 30018 30027 Potential Media Affected: SOIL, SV Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) 083-751-01 083-751-14 083-751-15 375-381-34 375-381-35 404830 60001110 COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo Completion Date: 2009-10-23 00:00:00 Comments: On 10/23/2009, DTSC prepared & transmitted the project close out Cost Recovery Unit Memorandum. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Agreement Terminated Notification Completion Date: 2009-08-17 00:00:00 Comments: On August 17, 2009, DTSC received a letter from the District, dated August 12, 2009, with notification that the District is terminating the Agreement effective immediately. The letter also indicates, however, that a summary data report will be submitted to DTSC when ready. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Technical Workplan Completion Date: 2009-07-03 00:00:00 Comments: Via email on 07/03/2009, DTSC noted that the site sampling plan appeared consistent with discussions with the District s consultant and provided comments on the site sampling plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 30 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: PLATINUM TRIANGLE REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAL60001110 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: SCHOOL ORANGE STATUS: INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 29 Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Fieldwork Completion Date: 2009-07-10 00:00:00 Comments: On July 10, 2009, fieldwork was completed per District s consultant. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Public Notice Completion Date: 2009-07-07 00:00:00 Comments: Via email on July 7, 2009, DTSC received a final copy of the Field Work Notice and was informed that the Notice was posted at the 1010 and 1016 E. Katella properties and delivered to properties within the line of sight of the proposed school property. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Technical Report Completion Date: 2009-10-22 00:00:00 Comments: DTSC did not review the Environmental Assessment Summary Report since the District terminated the EOA (August 2009) prior to receipt of the Report. The report summarized the soil and soil vapor sampling results from fieldwork conducted in July 2009. Maximum concentrations in soil gas include the following: 0.15 ug/l of naphthalene; 580 ug/l of PCE; 20 ug/l of TCE. The risk evaluation estimated the cancer risk due to chlorinated compounds via the vapor intrusion pathway as 1.5 x 10-5 and the total hazard index as 17. PCE is the primary contributor to risk and hazard. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Completion Date: 2009-06-10 00:00:00 Comments: Signed agreement sent (FedEx) to District. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 48 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1016 KATELLA ID1: T0605900867 ANAHEIM CA 92803 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 30 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001097T LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 88UT183 CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1990-02-27 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 HWMANIFEST SEARCH ID: 67 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SE ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 8 NAME: TEST AMERICA DRILLING CORP REV: 02/19/10 ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAL000264848 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 31 DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 53 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 9 NAME: TEXACO SERVICE STATION REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 818 E KATELLA AVE ID1: T0605900569 ANAHEIM CA 92801 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 32 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000719T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1998-08-19 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1998-08-19 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 HWMANIFEST SEARCH ID: 68 DIST/DIR: 0.11 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 9 NAME: TEXACO #211247 REV: 02/19/10 ADDRESS: 818 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAL000254200 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 33 THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST INVENTORY (HWMI) SITE INFORMATION FROM THE CA EPA AND DTSC HAZARDOUS WASTE TRACKING SYSTEM (HWTS) : Date Record was Created: 6/20/2002 7:21:09 AM Inactivity Date: Facility Mail Name: Facility Mailing Address: PO BOX 6004, SAN RAMON, CA 94583 Owner Name: CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO Owner Address: PO BOX 6004, SAN RAMON, CA 94583 Contact Name: KATHY NORRIS - RM L2173 Contact Address: PO BOX 6004, SAN RAMON, CA 94583 Contact Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2005-2009: 2009 Method Type: 2009 Waste Type: 2009 Total Tonnage: 2008 Waste Type: 2008 Total Tonnage: 2007 Waste Type: 2007 Total Tonnage: 2006 Waste Type: 2006 Total Tonnage: 2005 Waste Type: 2005 Total Tonnage: HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2000-2004: 2004 Waste Type: 2004 Total Tonnage: 2003 Waste Type: 2003 Total Tonnage: 2002 Waste Type: 2002 Total Tonnage: 2001 Waste Type: 2001 Total Tonnage: 2000 Waste Type: 2000 Total Tonnage: HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 1993-1999: 1999 Waste Type: 1999 Total Tonnage: 1998 Waste Type: 1998 Total Tonnage: 1997 Waste Type: 1997 Total Tonnage: 1996 Waste Type: 1996 Total Tonnage: 1995 Waste Type: 1995 Total Tonnage: 1994 Waste Type: 1994 Total Tonnage: 1993 Waste Type: 1993 Total Tonnage: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 3 DIST/DIR: 0.12 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 10 NAME: CLUTCH CO REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1832 S LEWIS ST ID1: CA0000435925 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 34 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: KENNETH MAKLOSKI 1832 S LEWIS ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: CLUTCH CO OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: OPERATOR_TYPE: MAILING ADDRESS: 1832 S LEWIS ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 07/05/1994 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 3 DIST/DIR: 0.12 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 10 NAME: CLUTCH CO REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1832 S LEWIS ST ID1: CA0000435925 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 35 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 HWMANIFEST SEARCH ID: 64 DIST/DIR: 0.12 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 10 NAME: FASTEEL CORPORATION REV: 02/19/10 ADDRESS: 1832 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAL000324599 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 36 DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 9 DIST/DIR: 0.12 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 11 NAME: JOBBER MACHINE REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1836 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAD981980477 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 37 SITE INFORMATION OWNER NAME: OWNER TYPE: OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1838 S LEWIS ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION 333319 - OTHER COMMERCIAL AND SERVICE INDUSTRY MACHINERY MANUFACTURING ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 36 DIST/DIR: 0.12 NW ELEVATION: 147 MAP ID: 12 NAME: GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 1700 S LEWIS ST ID1: TISID-STATE7219 ANAHEIM CA 92825 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: INACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 38 UST HISTORICAL DATA This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were never included. The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board That agency no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997. Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards. Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 HWMANIFEST SEARCH ID: 66 DIST/DIR: 0.12 NW ELEVATION: 147 MAP ID: 12 NAME: OMMI DUCT SYSTEMS REV: 02/19/10 ADDRESS: 1700 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAL000212088 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 39 THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST INVENTORY (HWMI) SITE INFORMATION FROM THE CA EPA AND DTSC HAZARDOUS WASTE TRACKING SYSTEM (HWTS) : Date Record was Created: 1/14/2000 Inactivity Date: Facility Mail Name: Facility Mailing Address: 1700 S LEWIS ST, ANAHEIM, CA 92805-6438 Owner Name: ROBERT BRUMLEU Owner Address: 1700 S LEWIS ST, ANAHEIM, CA 92805-6438 Contact Name: CHRISTOPHER W SHORT/GEN MNGR Contact Address: 1700 S LEWIS ST, ANAHEIM, CA 92805-6438 Contact Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2005-2009: 2009 Method Type: STORAGE, BULKING, AND/OR TRANSFER OFF SITE--NO TREATMENT/REOVERY (H010-H129) OR (H131-H135) 2009 Waste Type: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent 2009 Total Tonnage: 0.336 2008 Waste Type: Waste oil and mixed oil 2008 Total Tonnage: 0.9 2007 Waste Type: 2007 Total Tonnage: 2006 Waste Type: 2006 Total Tonnage: 2005 Waste Type: 2005 Total Tonnage: HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2000-2004: 2004 Waste Type: 2004 Total Tonnage: 2003 Waste Type: 2003 Total Tonnage: 2002 Waste Type: 2002 Total Tonnage: 2001 Waste Type: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent 2001 Total Tonnage: 0.3 2000 Waste Type: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent 2000 Total Tonnage: 0.27 HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 1993-1999: 1999 Waste Type: 1999 Total Tonnage: 1998 Waste Type: 1998 Total Tonnage: 1997 Waste Type: 1997 Total Tonnage: 1996 Waste Type: 1996 Total Tonnage: 1995 Waste Type: 1995 Total Tonnage: 1994 Waste Type: 1994 Total Tonnage: 1993 Waste Type: 1993 Total Tonnage: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 HWMANIFEST SEARCH ID: 65 DIST/DIR: 0.12 SW ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 13 NAME: L & B CONNECTING ROD REV: 02/19/10 ADDRESS: 1830 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAL000257128 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 40 DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 14 DIST/DIR: 0.16 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 14 NAME: NATIONAL CRANKSHAFT CO REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1848 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAD982496390 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 41 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER 1848 S LEWIS ST ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: WHEELER RICHARD OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1848 S LEWIS ST ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 04/30/1990 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 14 DIST/DIR: 0.16 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 14 NAME: NATIONAL CRANKSHAFT CO REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1848 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAD982496390 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 42 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 11 DIST/DIR: 0.19 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 15 NAME: LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS LLC REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 700 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAR000016774 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 43 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: WILLIAM SPRINGER 2429 S PECK RD WHITTIER CA 90601 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: JAMES A BARKER OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: OPERATOR_TYPE: MAILING ADDRESS: 2429 S PECK RD WHITTIER, CA 90601 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 11/30/1998 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 11 DIST/DIR: 0.19 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 15 NAME: LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS LLC REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 700 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAR000016774 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 44 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION: D001 - IGNITABLE WASTE D007 - CHROMIUM D008 - LEAD F003 - THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/ BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NON- HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 62 DIST/DIR: 0.19 SW ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 15 NAME: WESTSIDE MATERIALS REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 700 E KATELLA AVE ID1: T0605900518 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 45 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000648T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1991-02-08 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1987-09-28 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): * Historical Enforcement ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 1988-02-02 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Unauthorized Release Form ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 17 DIST/DIR: 0.19 NW ELEVATION: 147 MAP ID: 16 NAME: ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ANAHEIM PRINTING REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1701 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAD982438715 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 46 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: JOSE CASTILLO 1701 S LEWIS ST ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER THE OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1701 S LEWIS ST ANAHEIM, CA 928 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 03/04/1991 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 17 DIST/DIR: 0.19 NW ELEVATION: 147 MAP ID: 16 NAME: ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ANAHEIM PRINTING REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1701 S LEWIS ST ID1: CAD982438715 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 47 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 6 DIST/DIR: 0.20 NE ELEVATION: 150 MAP ID: 17 NAME: GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1140 E HOWELL AVE ID1: CAR000065656 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 48 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: MARK CASALE 1140 E HOWELL AVE ANAHEIM CA 928056452 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: OPERATOR_TYPE: MAILING ADDRESS: 1140 E HOWELL AVE ANAHEIM, CA 928056452 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 02/08/2000 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 6 DIST/DIR: 0.20 NE ELEVATION: 150 MAP ID: 17 NAME: GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1140 E HOWELL AVE ID1: CAR000065656 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 49 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 12 DIST/DIR: 0.20 SE ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 18 NAME: MALCO SERVICES REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1865 S SANTA CRUZ ID1: CAR000053223 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 50 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: MIKE STENNER 1865 SO SANTA CRUZ ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: BUDDY MALONE OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: OPERATOR_TYPE: MAILING ADDRESS: 1865 SO SANTA CRUZ ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 06/10/1999 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 12 DIST/DIR: 0.20 SE ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 18 NAME: MALCO SERVICES REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1865 S SANTA CRUZ ID1: CAR000053223 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 51 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 16 DIST/DIR: 0.20 SE ELEVATION: 147 MAP ID: 19 NAME: ORANGE COUNTY MICROFILM INC REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1456 E KATELLA ID1: CAD982509358 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 52 SITE INFORMATION OWNER NAME: LYKINS BOB OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1456 E KATELLA ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 20 DIST/DIR: 0.20 SW ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 20 NAME: PACIFIC IMAGE REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1: CA0000047258 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: LGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 53 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: ALEX GODINEZ SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT A ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] N/A OWNER NAME: PACFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: PACFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 06/03/2010 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: LQG - LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS: GENERATES MORE THAN 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION 325188 - ALL OTHER BASIC INORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING 334412 - BARE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 20 DIST/DIR: 0.20 SW ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 20 NAME: PACIFIC IMAGE REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1: CA0000047258 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: LGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 54 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: AGENCY: EPA DATE: 05/09/2005 TYPE: VIOLATION INFORMATION: VIOLATION NUMBER: 1 RESPONSIBLE: E - EPA DETERMINED: 05/20/2005 DETERMINED BY: E - EPA CITATION: RESOLVED: 05/20/2005 TYPE: GENERATORS - GENERAL VIOLATION NUMBER: 6001 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE DETERMINED: 10/30/2010 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE CITATION: RESOLVED: 10/30/2010 TYPE: GENERATORS - GENERAL HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION: 792 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 21 DIST/DIR: 0.20 SW ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 20 NAME: PACIFIC IMAGE, INC REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1: CAO000047258 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: LGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 55 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION OWNER NAME: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 02/27/2008 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: LQG - LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS: GENERATES MORE THAN 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION 334412 - BARE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 21 DIST/DIR: 0.20 SW ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 20 NAME: PACIFIC IMAGE, INC REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1: CAO000047258 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: LGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 56 792 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 2 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 21 NAME: AIRPORT COACH REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAY ID1: CAD983657537 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 57 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: PAUL WIGGINS 917 E GENE AUTRY WY ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: AIRPORT COACH OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: OPERATOR_TYPE: MAILING ADDRESS: 917 E GENE AUTRY WY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 01/25/1993 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 2 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 21 NAME: AIRPORT COACH REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAY ID1: CAD983657537 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 58 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 22 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 21 NAME: RYDER STUDENT TRANS REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 917 PACIFICO AVE ID1: CAD982048316 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 59 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: MIKE LUKE 917 E PACIFICO ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: RYDER STUDENT TRANS OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 917 E PACIFICO ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 07/18/1991 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 22 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 21 NAME: RYDER STUDENT TRANS REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 917 PACIFICO AVE ID1: CAD982048316 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 60 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 37 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 21 NAME: RYDER STUDENT TRANS CO REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 917 PACIFICO AVE ID1: TISID-STATE34120 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 61 UST HISTORICAL DATA This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were never included. The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board That agency no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997. Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards. Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 51 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 21 NAME: RYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAY ID1: T0605901626 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 62 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002204T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1996-10-24 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-10-24 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Summary ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-10-24 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 10 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SE ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 22 NAME: LIFE FLEET REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1890 S BETMOR LN ID1: CA0000133082 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 63 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: BRAD JONES 1890 S BETMOR LN ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: LIFE FLEET OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: OPERATOR_TYPE: MAILING ADDRESS: 1890 S BETMOR LN ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 02/11/1994 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 10 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SE ELEVATION: 144 MAP ID: 22 NAME: LIFE FLEET REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1890 S BETMOR LN ID1: CA0000133082 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 64 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 15 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 23 NAME: ORANGE COUNTY AUTO REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 620 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD983588161 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 65 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: CRISPINO RICH 620 E KATELLA ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: ORANGE COUNTY AUTO OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 620 E KATELLA ANAHEIM, CA 92805 UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 07/05/1991 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 15 DIST/DIR: 0.21 SW ELEVATION: 145 MAP ID: 23 NAME: ORANGE COUNTY AUTO REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 620 E KATELLA AVE ID1: CAD983588161 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 66 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 13 DIST/DIR: 0.22 SE ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 24 NAME: MER CEDES SHOP THE REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1884 S SANTA CRUZ ID1: CAD983588153 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 67 - Continued on next page - SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: PRESTON GREG 1884 S SANTA CRUZ STE B ANAHEIM CA 92805 PHONE: [PHONE REDACTED] OWNER NAME: ON THE BALL TYPESETTING OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS: 1884 S SANTA CRUZ STE B ANAHEIM, C UNIVERSE INFORMATION: RECEIVED DATE: 07/05/1991 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA) SUBJCA: N - NO SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD: CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO LAND TYPE: O-OTHER SHORT TERM GEN: N TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO NAIC INFORMATION 811111 - GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 13 DIST/DIR: 0.22 SE ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 24 NAME: MER CEDES SHOP THE REV: 11/9/11 ADDRESS: 1884 S SANTA CRUZ ID1: CAD983588153 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: SGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA Site Details Page - 68 ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 38 DIST/DIR: 0.22 SE ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 25 NAME: SCOTTS INDEPENDENT REV: 03/05/2001 ADDRESS: 1885 S SANTA CRUZ ID1: ANAHIEMNA5 ANAHEIM CA ID2: ORANGE STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 69 ANAHEIM CERTIFIED & NON COMPLIANT TANKS LIST INFORMATION According to the Anaheim Fire Dept. the following information is current as of 03/17/03 Certified Petroleum Tanks: Non Petroleum Tanks: Waste Tanks: 1 Non Petroleum Tank Contents: WASTE OIL Comments: Certificate Number: NA5 Date Certificate Issued: Number of Tags Issued: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 UST SEARCH ID: 39 DIST/DIR: 0.22 SE ELEVATION: 143 MAP ID: 25 NAME: SCOTTS INDEPENDENT PORSCHE REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 1885 SANTA CRUZ ID1: TISID-STATE34184 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: Site Details Page - 70 UST HISTORICAL DATA This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were never included. The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board That agency no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997. Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards. Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 49 DIST/DIR: 0.26 SW ELEVATION: 142 MAP ID: 26 NAME: JOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1858 ANAHEIM WAY ID1: T0605901679 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 71 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002305T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1995-02-02 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1995-02-02 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1995-02-02 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 59 DIST/DIR: 0.27 NE ELEVATION: 150 MAP ID: 27 NAME: WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1111 HOWELL AVENUE E. ID1: T0605974729 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 72 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083004016T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 2005-09-08 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-09-08 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 61 DIST/DIR: 0.27 NE ELEVATION: 150 MAP ID: 27 NAME: WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1111 HOWELL AVE ID1: T0605901991 ANAHEIM CA 92802 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 73 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002912T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1996-12-19 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-12-19 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-12-19 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 60 DIST/DIR: 0.29 NE ELEVATION: 150 MAP ID: 28 NAME: WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1213 HOWELL AVENUE E. ID1: T0605906599 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 74 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083004017T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 2005-08-01 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-08-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 45 DIST/DIR: 0.31 NW ELEVATION: 149 MAP ID: 29 NAME: COORS DISRIBUTING COMPANY REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1625 S LEWIS ST ID1: T060599039 ANAHEIM CA 92802 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 75 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083003867T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline, Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 2002-08-05 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): There was a case opened in 2000 for a waste oil tank andthat case was closed in 2001. A second case was opened in 2002 and later closed A third issue related to VOCs was closed by the Regional Board in 2003. ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-08-05 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 46 DIST/DIR: 0.32 SW ELEVATION: 140 MAP ID: 30 NAME: DANA EDWARDS REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1901 S MANCHESTER AVE ID1: T0605900745 ANAHEIM CA 92802 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 76 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000936T LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 86UT077 CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Stoddard solvent / Mineral Spriits / Distillates POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1986-07-11 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 50 DIST/DIR: 0.37 NE ELEVATION: 155 MAP ID: 31 NAME: NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1500 E BABBITT AVE ID1: T0605900234 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 77 - Continued on next page - RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: SANTA ANA (REGION 8) REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000298T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline, Diesel POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Aquifer used for drinking water supply STATUS: Open - Site Assessment STATUS DATE: 2002-12-05 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-12-27 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-05-15 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2010-10-07 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Verbal Enforcement ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-01-23 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-11-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Meeting ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2004-04-26 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-12-22 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Verbal Enforcement ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-01-28 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-06-10 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-08-29 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): * No Action ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-02-29 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 50 DIST/DIR: 0.37 NE ELEVATION: 155 MAP ID: 31 NAME: NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1500 E BABBITT AVE ID1: T0605900234 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 78 - Continued on next page - ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Vacuum Extract ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Pump and Treat Groundwater ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Remove free product ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-07-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-01-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-04-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-09-05 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Verbal Communication ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-04-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-01-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-01-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Soil and Water Investigation Report ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-07-31 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Soil and Water Investigation Report ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2011-03-07 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-07-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-04-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 50 DIST/DIR: 0.37 NE ELEVATION: 155 MAP ID: 31 NAME: NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1500 E BABBITT AVE ID1: T0605900234 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 79 - More Details Exist For This Site; Max Page Limit Reached - ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-01-31 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Soil and Water Investigation Workplan ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-07-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-02-05 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-01-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-10-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-10-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-07-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-04-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2010-01-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-04-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-01-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2004-02-28 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-07-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-05-15 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE DATE (blank if not reported): 2004-04-30 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 43 DIST/DIR: 0.39 SE ELEVATION: 149 MAP ID: 32 NAME: ARCO #6220 REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD ID1: T0605900941 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 80 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001205T LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF LOCAL CASE NUMBER: CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1994-10-19 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1994-10-09 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT DATE (blank if not reported): 1994-10-19 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 47 DIST/DIR: 0.45 NE ELEVATION: 156 MAP ID: 33 NAME: DEL PISO BRICK COMPANY REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1635 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD ID1: T0605900097 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 81 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000125T LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 90UT080 CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1990-08-08 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 44 DIST/DIR: 0.46 NE ELEVATION: 156 MAP ID: 34 NAME: CERTRON REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 1701 STATE COLLEGE ID1: T0605900725 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 82 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 85UT095 CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Under Investigation STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1986-04-03 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 55 DIST/DIR: 0.46 NW ELEVATION: 153 MAP ID: 35 NAME: TOSCO CORPORATION SITE REV: 01/12/06 ADDRESS: 1515 LEWIS ID1: T0605999297 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: LEAK BEING CONFIRMED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 83 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: LOCAL AGENCY REGIONAL BOARD: 08 LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 083003795T RESPONSIBLE PARTY: ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: SITE OPERATOR: WATER SYSTEM: CASE NUMBER: 083003795T CASE TYPE: UNDEFINED SUBSTANCE LEAKED: DIESEL SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: OTHER CAUSE LEAK SOURCE: OTHER HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: NO DESCRIPTION DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00 HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: STOP DATE (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00 STATUS: LEAK BEING CONFIRMED ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank if not reported): ENTER DATE (blank if not reported): REVIEW DATE (blank if not reported): DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00 DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported): DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported): DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank if not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank if not reported): REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00 MTBE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration): MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION (parts per billion): MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION (parts per million): MTBE CNTS: 0 MTBE FUEL: 0 MTBE TESTED: NOT REQUIRED TO BE TESTED MTBE CLASS: * ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 LUST SEARCH ID: 57 DIST/DIR: 0.48 SE ELEVATION: 152 MAP ID: 36 NAME: UNOCAL REV: 01/10/12 ADDRESS: 2001 KATELLA ID1: T0605900918 ANAHEIM CA 92801 ID2: ORANGE STATUS: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA Site Details Page - 84 RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001162T LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 89UT040 CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil STATUS: Completed - Case Closed STATUS DATE: 1990-08-28 00:00:00 SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00 ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 32 DIST/DIR: 0.60 NW ELEVATION: 151 MAP ID: 37 NAME: SILGAN PLASTICS CORPORATION REV: 03/14/11 ADDRESS: 611 E CERRITOS AVE ID1: CAL30300130 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: EVALUATION ORANGE STATUS: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 85 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: Evaluation Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency Status Date: 2001-03-02 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: Not Applicable Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Project Manager: Supervisor: Referred - Not Assigned Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) 30300130 COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: SB 1248 Notification Completion Date: 2001-02-20 00:00:00 Comments: SB 1248 Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 27 DIST/DIR: 0.67 NE ELEVATION: 156 MAP ID: 38 NAME: ITASCO REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 2211 E HOWELL AVE ID1: CAL30280129 ANAHEIM CA 92804 ID2: HISTORICAL ORANGE STATUS: REFER: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 86 - Continued on next page - GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: Historical Status: Refer: Status Date: 1993-12-16 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Project Manager: Supervisor: Referred - Not Assigned Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contaminants: OTHER ORGANIC SOLIDS, OXYGENATED SOLVENTS, ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS, biphenyls (PCBs) Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: * CERC2 OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) MICHAEL-RAND PLATING CAD982359879 30280129 COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: * Discovery Completion Date: 1981-05-28 00:00:00 Comments: Facility identified via tip from Orange County Sanitary District - firm acid rinse goes into manhole. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: *Site Inspection (SI) Report Completion Date: 1989-09-26 00:00:00 Comments: Site Inspection Done: EPA recommends Listing Site Inspec- tion; DHS recommends hazard ranking. Reasons for recommend- ation of further work at the site: Soil samples collected during cleanup in 1983 were either surface samples or samp- les collected at a maximum if 8 ft. depth. No sampling was done below the 8 feet that was excavated and backfilled with clean soil. It is not reasonable to believe that 1200ppm of TCE would remain within 8 feet of the surface in an unlined sump. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completion Date: 1988-01-08 00:00:00 Comments: Preliminary Assessment Done: Twenty yards, three of waste, removed to BKK (04/15/83). Samples (05/11/83) show solvent contamination. Site excavated to depth of eight feet; 409 tons of soil removed to BKK. Soil sample levels (11/04/83) below TTLC and TLC. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Screening Completion Date: 1987-05-06 00:00:00 Comments: Site Screening Done: CERCLA grant Preliminary Assessment required. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 27 DIST/DIR: 0.67 NE ELEVATION: 156 MAP ID: 38 NAME: ITASCO REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 2211 E HOWELL AVE ID1: CAL30280129 ANAHEIM CA 92804 ID2: HISTORICAL ORANGE STATUS: REFER: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 87 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report Completion Date: 1983-11-08 00:00:00 Comments: RA Soil. Site has been hazard mitigated. Clean-up complete. 294 tons of contaminated soil was removed. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 31 DIST/DIR: 0.79 SW ELEVATION: 132 MAP ID: 39 NAME: PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE/WILKEN WAY ID1: CAL30880003 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: SCHOOL ORANGE STATUS: NO FURTHER ACTION CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 88 - Continued on next page - GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: School Investigation Status: No Further Action Status Date: 2003-08-07 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: School District Regulatory Agencies Involved: DTSC Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Project Manager: Supervisor: Shahir Haddad Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: 14.06 Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses: RESIDENTIAL AREA Potential Contaminants: 30018 Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: SOIL Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ANAHEIM CITY SD-PROPOSED PONDEROSA ELEM PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (PROPOSED) 404300 30880003 COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Completion Date: 2003-08-07 00:00:00 Comments: DTSC approve PEA with a No Further Action determination Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: * Workplan Completion Date: 2002-07-18 00:00:00 Comments: Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) Completion Date: 2003-01-13 00:00:00 Comments: Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR) ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 31 DIST/DIR: 0.79 SW ELEVATION: 132 MAP ID: 39 NAME: PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE/WILKEN WAY ID1: CAL30880003 ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2: SCHOOL ORANGE STATUS: NO FURTHER ACTION CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 89 Completion Date: 2002-01-29 00:00:00 Comments: Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo Completion Date: 2003-08-11 00:00:00 Comments: Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement Completion Date: 2002-01-15 00:00:00 Comments: ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 28 DIST/DIR: 0.83 NE ELEVATION: 163 MAP ID: 40 NAME: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 2201 E CERRITOS AVE ID1: CAL30280120 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2: EVALUATION ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 90 - Continued on next page - GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: Evaluation Status: Active Status Date: 2008-07-01 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: Regulatory Agencies Involved: 8 - Santa Ana Lead Agency: 8 - Santa Ana Project Manager: EILEEN MANANIAN Supervisor: Emad Yemut Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: 18.6 Assessor s Parcel Number: 083-210-31 Past Uses: MANUFACTURING - CHEMICALS Potential Contaminants: * HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS * ORGANIC SOLIDS WITH HALOGENS * OTHER ORGANIC SOLIDS * CONTAMINATED SOIL * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS * TANK BOTTOM WASTES * UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE * OTHER PESTICIDE CONTAINERS, 30 GALLONS OR MORE * TETRAETHYL LEAD SLUDGE Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NMA Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: EPA - PASI OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) 083-210-31 CAD008364150 SL0605956547 30280120 COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency) Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: PA/SI Reassessment Completion Date: 2009-02-09 00:00:00 Comments: Reassessment completed by DTSC and approved by EPA Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: *Site Inspection (SI) Report Completion Date: 1989-05-10 00:00:00 Comments: SITE INSP DONE SANTA ANA IS CURRENTLY ADDRESSING CONTAMINATION ISSUES, THEREFORE, DHS STATUS IS PENDING. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completion Date: 1988-06-27 00:00:00 Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE PENDING STATUS BASED ON OUTCOME OF SITE INSPECTION. Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Screening Completion Date: 1987-05-29 00:00:00 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 28 DIST/DIR: 0.83 NE ELEVATION: 163 MAP ID: 40 NAME: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY REV: 07/14/11 ADDRESS: 2201 E CERRITOS AVE ID1: CAL30280120 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2: EVALUATION ORANGE STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 91 Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Sub- Area Name: Document Type: Site Screening Completion Date: 2006-04-12 00:00:00 Comments: Site Screening Completed ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 STATE SEARCH ID: 33 DIST/DIR: 1.00 SE ELEVATION: 132 MAP ID: 41 NAME: THE CITY PLACE NORTH REV: 03/14/11 ADDRESS: 3745 W CHAPMAN AVE ID1: CAL30000017 ORANGE CA 92868 ID2: EVALUATION ORANGE STATUS: REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CA DTSC Site Details Page - 92 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION Site Type: Evaluation Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency Status Date: 2000-12-05 00:00:00 NPL Site: NO Funding: Not Applicable Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Project Manager: Supervisor: Referred - Not Assigned Branch: Cleanup Cypress Acres: Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED Restricted Use: NO Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED Special Programs Associated with this Site: OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency) 30000017 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Descriptions NPL: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST - The National Priorities List is a list of the worst hazardous waste sites that have been identified by Superfund. Sites are only put on the list after they have been scored using the Hazard Ranking System (HRS), and have been subjected to public comment. Any site on the NPL is eligible for cleanup using Superfund Trust money. A Superfund site is any land in the United States that has been contaminated by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment.FINAL - Currently on the Final - Proposed for NPL NPL DELISTED: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST Subset - Database of delisted NPL sites. The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate.DELISTED - Deleted from the Final NPL CERCLIS: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM (CERCLIS)- CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.PART OF NPL- Site is part of NPL siteDELETED - Deleted from the Final NPLFINAL - Currently on the Final NPLNOT PROPOSED - Not on the NPLNOT VALID - Not Valid Site or IncidentPROPOSED - Proposed for NPLREMOVED - Removed from Proposed PLAN - Pre-proposal SiteWITHDRAWN - Withdrawn NFRAP: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHIVED SITES - database of Archive designated CERCLA sites that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.NFRAP – No Further Remedial Action PlanP - Site is part of NPL siteD - Deleted from the Final NPLF - Currently on the Final NPLN - Not on the NPLO - Not Valid Site or IncidentP - Proposed for NPLR - Removed from Proposed NPLS - Pre-proposal SiteW – Withdrawn RCRA COR ACT: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES - Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices. This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.RCRAInfo facilities that have reported violations and subject to corrective actions. RCRA TSD: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM TREATMENT, STORAGE, and DISPOSAL FACILITIES. - Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are ---PAGE BREAK--- required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices. This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.Facilities that treat, store, dispose, or incinerate hazardous waste. RCRA GEN: EPA/MA DEP/CT DEP RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM GENERATORS - Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices. This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.Facilities that generate or transport hazardous waste or meet other RCRA requirements.LGN - Large Quantity - Small Quantity – Conditionally Exempt Generator.Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List) facilities. CONNECTICUT HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST – Database of all shipments of hazardous waste within, into or from Connecticut. The data includes date of shipment, transporter and TSD info, and material shipped and quantity. This data is appended to the details of existing generator records. MASSACHUSETTES HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR – database of generators that are regulated under the MA DEP. VQN-MA = generates less than 220 pounds or 27 gallons per month of hazardous waste or waste oil.SQN-MA = generates 220 to 2,200 pounds or 27 to 270 gallons per month of waste oil.LQG-MA = generates greater than 2,200 lbs of hazardous waste or waste oil per month. RCRA NLR: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES - Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices. This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.not currently classified by the EPA but are still included in the RCRAInfo database. Reasons for non classification: Failure to report in a timely matter. No longer in business. No longer in business at the listed address. No longer generating hazardous waste materials in quantities which require reporting. Fed Brownfield: EPA BROWNFIELD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (BMS) - database designed to assist EPA in collecting, tracking, and updating information, as well as reporting on the major activities and accomplishments of the various Brownfield grant Programs./n CLEANUPS IN MY COMMUNITY (subset) - Sites, facilities and properties that have been contaminated by hazardous materials and are being, or have been, cleaned up under EPA's brownfield’s program. ERNS: EPA/NRC EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (ERNS) - Database of incidents reported to the National Response Center. These incidents include chemical spills, accidents involving chemicals (such as fires or explosions), oil spills, transportation accidents that involve oil or chemicals, releases of radioactive materials, sightings of oil sheens on bodies of water, terrorist incidents involving chemicals, incidents where illegally dumped chemicals have been found, and drills intended to prepare responders to handle these kinds of incidents. Data since January 2001 has been received from the National Response System database as the EPA no longer maintains this data. ---PAGE BREAK--- Tribal Lands: DOI/BIA INDIAN LANDS OF THE UNITED STATES - Database of areas with boundaries established by treaty, statute, and (or) executive or court order, recognized by the Federal Government as territory in which American Indian tribes have primary governmental authority. The Indian Lands of the United States map layer shows areas of 640 acres or more, administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Included are Federally-administered lands within a reservation which may or may not be considered part of the reservation.BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFIARS CONTACT - Regional contact information for the Bureau of Indian Affairs offices. State/Tribal Sites: CA EPA / CAL SITES- The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has developed an electronic database system called Envirostor with information about sites that are known to be contaminated with hazardous substances as well as information on uncharacterized properties where further studies may reveal problems. The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Database formerly known as CalSites, is used primarily by DTSC’s staff as an informational tool to evaluate and track activities at properties that may have been affected by the release of hazardous substances. The displays information in six categories, two of which are found in ST. The categories listed under ST are: 1. State Response Sites. 2. School Property Evaluation Program Properties (SCH) Please Note: Our reports list the above sites as DB Type (STATE). Other categories found in the are listed in our reports in the DB Types OT and VC. Each Category contains information on properties based upon the type of work taking place at the site. State Response Sites contains only known and potential hazardous substance release sites considered as posing the greatest threat to the public. School sites included in ST will be found within the School Property Evaluation Program. CORTESE LIST-Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List has been compiled by Cal/EPA, Hazardous Materials Data Management Program to provide information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. Cortese List sites that fall under DTSC's guidelines for State Response sites are included in our reports in the ST category as are qualifying sites from the Annual Work Plan (formerly Bond Expenditure Plan) and the historic ASPIS databases. State Spills 90: CA EPA SLIC REGIONS 1 - 9- The California Regional Water Quality Control Boards maintain report of sites that have records of spills, leaks, investigation, and cleanups. State/Tribal SWL: CA SWIS SOLID WASTE INFORMATION SYSTEM-The California Integrated Waste Management Board maintains a database on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the state of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites. For more information on individual sites call the number listed in the source field.. Please Note: This database contains poor site location information for many sites in our reports; therefore, it may not be possible to locate or plot some sites in our reports. WMUDS-The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Waste Management Unit Database System (WMUDS). It is no longer updated. It tracked management units for several regulatory programs related to waste management and its potential impact on groundwater. Two of these programs (SWAT & TPCA) are no longer on-going regulatory programs as described below. Chapter 15 (SC15) is still an on-going regulatory program and information is updated periodically but not to the WMUDS database. The WMUDS System contains information from the following agency databases: Facility, Waste Management Unit (WMU), Waste Discharger System (WDS), SWAT, Chapter 15, TPCA, RCRA, Inspections, Violations, and Enforcement's. Note: This database contains poor site location information for many sites in our reports; therefore, it may not be possible to locate or plot some sites in reports. ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILLS LIST- A list maintained by the Orange County Health Department. ---PAGE BREAK--- State/Tribal LUST: CA LUSTIS- The State Water Resources Control Board maintains a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks. Information for this database is collected from the states regional boards quarterly and integrated with this database. SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEAKING TANKS- The San Diego County Department of Environmental Health maintains a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks within its HE17/58 database. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at phone number listed in the source information field. State/Tribal UST/AST: CA EPA/COUNTY/CITY ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS LISTING-The Above Ground Petroleum Storage Act became State Law effective January 1, 1990. In general, the law requires owners or operators of AST's with petroleum products to file a storage statement and pay a fee by July 1, 1990 and every two years thereafter, take specific action to prevent spills, and in certain instances implement a groundwater monitoring program. This law does not apply to that portion of a tank facility associated with the production oil and regulated by the State Division of Oil and Gas of the Dept. of Conservation. SWEEPS / FIDS STATE REGISTERED UNDEGROUND STORAGE TANKS- Until 1994 the State Water Resources Control Board maintained a database of registered underground storage tanks statewide referred to as the SWEEPS System. The SWEEPS UST information was integrated with the CAL EPA's Facility Index System database (FIDS) which is a master index of information from numerous California agency environmental databases. That was last updated in 1994. We have included the UST information from the FIDS database in our reports for historical purposes to help our clients identify where tanks may possibly have existed. For more information on specific sites from individual paper files archived at the State Water Resources Control Board call the number listed with the source information. INDIAN LANDS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS LIST- A listing of underground storage tanks currently on Indian Lands under federal jurisdiction. California Indian Land USTS are administered by US EPA Region 9.CUPA DATABASES & SOURCES- Definition of a CUPA: A Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) is a local agency that has been certified by the CAL EPA to implement six state environmental programs within the local agency's jurisdiction. These can be a county, city, or JPA (Joint Powers Authority). This program was established under the amendments to the California Health and Safety Code made by SB 1082 in 1994. A Participating Agency (PA) is a local agency that has been designated by the local CUPA to administer one or more Unified Programs within their jurisdiction on behalf of the CUPA. A Designated Agency (DA) is an agency that has not been certified by the CUPA but is the responsible local agency that would implement the six unified programs until they are certified. Please Note: We collect and maintains information regarding Underground Storage Tanks from the majority of the CUPAS and Participating Agencies in the State of California. These agencies typically do not maintain nor release such information on a uniform or consistent schedule; therefore, currency of the data may vary. Please look at the details on a specific site with a UST record in the First Search Report to determine the actual currency date of the record as provided by the relevant agency. Numerous efforts are made on a regular basis to obtain updated records. State/Tribal IC: CA EPA DEED-RESTRICTED SITES LISTING- The California EPA’s Department of Toxic Substances Control Board maintains a list of deed-restricted sites, properties where the DTSC has placed limits or requirements on the future use of the property due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical or necessary at the site. State/Tribal VCP: CA EPA / CAL SITES- The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has developed an electronic database system called Envirostor with information about sites that are known to be contaminated with hazardous substances as well as information on uncharacterized properties where further studies may reveal problems. The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Database formerly known as CalSites, is used primarily by DTSC’s staff as an informational tool to evaluate and track activities at properties that may have been affected by the release of hazardous substances. The Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) category contains only those ---PAGE BREAK--- properties undergoing voluntary investigation and/or cleanup and which are listed in the Voluntary Cleanup Program.Please Note: Our reports list the above sites as DB Type VC. State Permits: CA EPA/COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY HE17 PERMITS- The HE17/58 database tracks establishments issued permits and the status of their permits in relation to compliance with federal, state, and local regulations that the County oversees. It tracks if a site is a hazardous waste generator, TSD, gas station, has underground tanks, violations, or unauthorized releases. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at the phone number listed in the source information field. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMITS- Handlers and Generators Permit Information Maintained by the Hazardous Materials Division. State Other: CA EPA/COUNTY / CAL SITES- The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has developed an electronic database system called Envirostor with information about sites that are known to be contaminated with hazardous substances as well as information on uncharacterized properties where further studies may reveal problems. The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Database formerly known as CalSites, is used primarily by DTSC’s staff as an informational tool to evaluate and track activities at properties that may have been affected by the release of hazardous substances. The displays information in six categories, two of which are found in ST. The categories listed under OT are: 1. Unconfirmed Properties Referred to Another Local or State Agency (REF) 2. Properties where a No Further Action Determination has been made (NFA) Please Note: Our reports list the above sites as DB Type (OTHER). Other categories found in the are listed in our reports in the DB Types ST and VC.LA COUNTY SITE MITIGATION COMPLAINT CONTROL LOG- The County of Los Angeles Public Health Investigation Compliant Control Log. ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL SITE CLEANUPS- List maintained by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency. RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE GENERATORS-A list of facilities in Riverside County which generate hazardous waste. SACRAMENTO COUNTY MASTER HAZMAT LIST-Master list of facilities within Sacramento County with potentially hazardous materials. SACRAMENTO COUNTY TOXIC SITE CLEANUPS-A list of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Federal IC / EC: EPA FEDERAL ENGINEERING AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS- Superfund sites that have either an engineering or an institutional control. The data includes the control and the media contaminated. RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES (RCRA) – RCRA site the have institutional controls. State/Tribal HW: CA EPA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST INVENTORY-Records maintained by the CA DTSC of Hazardous Waste Manifests used to track and document the transport of hazardous waste from a generator’s site to the site of its final disposition. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Database Sources NPL: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly NPL DELISTED: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly CERCLIS: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly NFRAP: EPA Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly RCRA COR ACT: EPA Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly RCRA TSD: EPA Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly RCRA GEN: EPA/MA DEP/CT DEP Environmental Protection Agency, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Updated quarterly RCRA NLR: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly Fed Brownfield: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly ERNS: EPA/NRC Environmental Protection AgencyNational Response Center. Updated annually ---PAGE BREAK--- Tribal Lands: DOI/BIA United States Department of the InteriorBureau of Indian Affairs Updated annually State/Tribal Sites: CA EPA The CAL EPA, Depart. Of Toxic Substances Control Phone: (916) 323-3400 For Cortese List information contact The CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control at (916) 445-6532 Updated quarterly/when available State Spills 90: CA EPA The California State Water Resources Control Board For phone number listings of departments within each region visit their web sites at: Updated when available State/Tribal SWL: CA The California Integrated Waste Management Board Phone:(916) 255-2331 The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227-4365 Orange County Health Department Phone:(714) 834-3536 Updated quarterly/when available State/Tribal LUST: CA The California State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227-4416 San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338-2242 Updated quarterly/when available State/Tribal UST/AST: CA EPA/COUNTY/CITY The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227-4364 CAL EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916)227-4404 US EPA Region 9 Underground Storage Tank Program Phone: (415) 972-3372 ALAMEDA COUNTY CUPAS: * County of Alameda Department of Environmental Health * Cities of Berkeley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore / Pleasanton, Newark, Oakland, San Leandro, Union ALPINE COUNTY CUPA: * Health Department (Only updated by agency sporadically) AMADOR COUNTY CUPA: * County of Amador Environmental Health Department BUTTE COUNTY CUPA * County of Butte Environmental Health Division (Only updated by agency biannually) CALAVERAS COUNTY CUPA: ---PAGE BREAK--- * County of Calaveras Environmental Health Department COLUSA COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Dept. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CUPA: * Hazardous Materials Program DEL NORTE COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Health and Social Services EL DORADO COUNTY CUPAS: * County of El Dorado Environmental Health - Solid Waste Div (Only updated by agency annually) * County of El Dorado EMD Tahoe Division (Only updated by agency annually) FRESNO COUNTY CUPA: * Haz. Mat and Solid Waste Programs GLENN COUNTY CUPA: * Air Pollution Control District HUMBOLDT COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Division IMPERIAL COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Planning and Building INYO COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department KERN COUNTY CUPA: * County of Kern Environmental Health Department * City of Bakersfield Fire Department KINGS COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Services LAKE COUNTY CUPA: * Division of Environmental Health LASSEN COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Agriculture LOS ANGELES COUNTY CUPAS: * County of Los Angeles Fire Department CUPA Data as maintained by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works * County of Los Angeles Environmental Programs Division * Cities of Burbank, El Segundo, Glendale, Long Beach/Signal Hill, Los Angeles,Pasadena, Santa Fe Springs, Santa Monica, Torrance, Vernon MADERA COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department MARIN COUNTY CUPA: * County of Marin Office of Waste Management * City of San Rafael Fire Department MARIPOSA COUNTY CUPA: * Health Department MENDOCINO COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department ---PAGE BREAK--- MERCED COUNTY CUPA: * Division of Environmental Health MODOC COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Agriculture MONO COUNTY CUPA: * Health Department MONTEREY COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Division NAPA COUNTY CUPA: * Hazardous Materials Section NEVADA COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department ORANGE COUNTY CUPAS: * County of Orange Environmental Health Department * Cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Orange, Santa Ana * County of Orange Environmental Health Department PLACER COUNTY CUPAS: * County of Placer Division of Environmental Health Field Office * Tahoe City * City of Roseville Roseville Fire Department PLUMAS COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department RIVERSIDE COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department SACRAMENTO COUNTY CUPA: * County Environmental Mgmt Dept, Haz. Mat. Div. SAN BENITO COUNTY CUPA: * City of Hollister Environmental Service Department SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CUPAS: * County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Haz. Mat. Div. * City of Hesperia Hesperia Fire Prevention Department *City of Victorville Victorville Fire Department SAN DIEGO COUNTY CUPA: * The San Diego County Dept. of Environmental Health HE 17/58 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Public Health SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Division SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CUPAS: * County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Division * City of San Luis Obispo City Fire Department SAN MATEO COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CUPA: ---PAGE BREAK--- * County Fire Dept Protective Services Division SANTA CLARA COUNTY CUPAS: * County of Santa Clara Hazardous Materials Compliance Division * Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District (Covers Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, & Morgan Hill) * Cities of Gilroy, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose Fire, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department SHASTA COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department SIERRA COUNTY CUPA: * Health Department SISKIYOU COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department SONOMA COUNTY CUPAS: * County of Sonoma Department Of Environmental Health * Cities of Healdsburg / Sebastopol, Petaluma, Santa Rosa STANISLAUS COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Environmental Resources Haz. Mat. Division SUTTER COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Agriculture TEHAMA COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Environmental Health TRINITY COUNTY CUPA: * Department of Health TULARE COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department TUOLUMNE COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health VENTURA COUNTY CUPAS: * County of Ventura Environmental Health Division * Cities of Oxnard, Ventura YOLO COUNTY CUPA: * Environmental Health Department YUBA COUNTY CUPA: * Yuba County of Emergency Services Updated quarterly/annually/when available State/Tribal IC: CA EPA The California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control.Phone:(916) 255-3745 Updated Updated quarterly/annually/when available State/Tribal VCP: CA EPA The California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control.Phone:(916) 255-3745 ---PAGE BREAK--- Updated Updated quarterly/annually/when available State Permits: CA EPA/COUNTY The San Diego County Depart. Of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338-2211 San Bernardino County Fire Department Phone:(909) 387-3080 Updated quarterly/when available State Other: CA EPA/COUNTY The CAL EPA, Depart. Of Toxic Substances Control Phone: (916) 323-3400 The Los Angeles County Hazardous Materials Division Phone: (323) 890-7806 Orange County Environmental Health Agency Phone: (714) 834-3536 Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Management Division Phone:(951) 358-5055 Sacramento County Environmental Management Department Phone: (916) 875-8550 Updated quarterly/when available Federal IC / EC: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly State/Tribal HW: CA EPA CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916) 255-087 Updated annually/when available ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch Street Name Report for Streets within .25 Mile(s) of Target Property Target Property: 905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB: SHO-71418.1 ANAHEIM CA 92805 Street Name Dist/Dir Street Name Dist/Dir Betmor Ln 0.19 SE Connecting Road 0.03 SW E Howell Ave 0.21 NW E Katella Ave 0.03 NE EAST KATELLA AVE 0.00-- I 5 0.25 SW Ramp 0.21 SW S Anaheim Way 0.2 SW S Betmor Ln 0.19 SE S Lewis St 0.08 NW S Santa Cruz St 0.18 SE Santa Ana Fwy 0.25 NW Station Cruz St 0.18 SE ---PAGE BREAK--- HISTORICAL FIRE INSURANCE MAPS NO MAPS AVAILABLE 01-11-12 SHO-71418.1 905 EAST KATELLA AVE ANAHEIM CA 92805 A search of FirstSearch Technology Corporation's proprietary database of historical fire insurance map availability confirmed that there are NO MAPS AVAILABLE for the Subject Location as shown above. FirstSearch Technology Corporation's proprietary database of historical fire insurance map availability represents abstracted information from the Sanborn® Map Company obtained through online access to the U.S. Library of Congress via local libraries. Copyright Policy & Disclaimer Certain Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps are copyrighted material and may not be reproduced without the expressed permission of the Sanborn Map Company. FirstSearch Technology Corporation warrants that it will employ its best efforts to maintain and deliver its information in an efficient and timely manner. Customer acknowledges that it understands that FirstSearch Technology Corporation obtains the above information from sources FirstSearch Technology Corporation considers reliable. However, THE WARRANTIES EXPRESSED HEREIN ARE IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, either expressed or implied, including without limitation any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness or suitability for a particular purpose (whether or not FirstSearch Technology Corporation may know, have reason to know, or have been advised of such purpose), whether arising by law or by reason of industry custom or usage. ALL SUCH OTHER WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch 1 Mile Radius ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites 905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805 Source: Tele Atlas Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch .5 Mile Radius ASTM Map: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL 905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805 Source: Tele Atlas Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch .25 Mile Radius ASTM Map: RCRAGEN, ERNS, UST, FED IC/EC, METH LABS 905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805 Source: Tele Atlas Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental FirstSearch .25 Mile Radius Non-ASTM Map: RCRANLR, Other, HW Manifest 905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805 Source: Tele Atlas Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste National Historic Sites and Landmark Sites Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 APPENDIX E USER PROVDED INFORMATION ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418 APPENDIX F PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP Commercial Property 905-917 East Katella Avenue APNS 082-261-23 and 082-261-24 Anaheim, California 92805 Photograph 1 – View north towards the southwest corner of 905-917 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 2 – View north across the parking area at the eastern margin of 905-917 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 3 – View south along the parking area along the western property margin at 905-917 East Katella Avenue. View is towards East Katella Avenue. Photograph 4 – View west towards the southeast corner of 905-917 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 5 – View east across the northern margin of 905-917 East Katella Avenue, the location of a former rail spur. Photograph 6 – View of the kitchen area used by the former tenant Whirlpool Corporation at 905- 917 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 7 – View of former Whirlpool Corporation lobby, used by current tenant New Image Office Design at 905-917 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 8 – View of the interior office space of the current tenant Golden West Medical at 905- 917 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 9 – View of the interior treatment room used by Golden West Medical at 905-917 East Katella Avenue Photograph 10 – View of the mezzanine training room used by former tenant Joshua Casey at 905- 917 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 11 – View of vacant office space used for storage and as a temporary construction area for tenant improvements at 905-917 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 12 – View of warehouse area used by current tenant Evriholder Products at 905-917 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 13 – View of warehouse area used by current tenant New Image Office Designs at 905- 917 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 14 – View of warehouse area used by current tenant Tandem Designs at 905-917 East Katella Avenue ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 15 – View looking east along East Katella Avenue from South Lewis Street. Photograph 16 – View looking north along South Lewis Street from East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP Commercial Property 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue APNs 082-261-27 and 082-261-28 Anaheim, California 92805 Photograph 1 – View north along the drive way towards the entrance to the property off of East Katella Avenue. Building 1005 East Katella Avenue is in view. Photograph 2 – View northeast towards buildings 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue from the driveway area on the southern side of the buildings. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 3 – View north towards the driveway area between buildings 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 4 – View south along the eastern margin of the overall subject property (east of building 1025 East Katella Avenue). ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 5 – View south along the western side of building 1015 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 6 – View south across the rooftops of 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 7 – View east along the northern margin of the property north of 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 8 – View of the interior space of 1015 East Katella Avenue, Suite C used by Telco Electric. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 9 – View of the interior space of 1015 East Katella Avenue, Suites F,G and H used by Digitech Business Solutions (office machine repair and service). Photograph 10 – View of the interior space of 1025 East Katella Avenue, Suite C used by Axxis Motorsports (off road repair and equipment). ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 11 – View of interior of 1025 East Katella Avenue, Suites D and E. The space is used as a workroom and shop area by OC and C Construction (custom kitchen, bath and general construction). Photograph 12 – View of interior space of 1025 East Katella Avenue, Suite G used by Christopher Beliovsky (miscellaneous private auto repair and refurbishing). ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 13 – View of pad-mounted electrical transformer located along the northern margin of the subject property. Photograph 14 – View of the pole-mounted transformers on overhead electrical power line running along western margin of property. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 15 – View east towards the subject property, Mr. Stox Restaurant at 1105 East Katella Avenue. East Katella Avenue is in view to the south. Photograph 16 – View of the interior dining area of Mr. Stox Restaurant at 1105 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418 Photograph 17 – View of the kitchen area of the Mr. Stox Restaurant at 1105 East Katella Avenue. Photograph 18 – View of the cooking grease stored at the northeast corner of the subject property at 1105 East Katella Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- September 2012 T R A F F I C I M PA C T A N A LY S I S U P D AT E PLATINUM GATEWAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (805 AND 917 EAST KATELLA AVENUE) ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA ---PAGE BREAK--- September 2012 T R A F F I C I M PA C T A N A LY S I S U P D AT E PLATINUM GATEWAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (805 AND 917 EAST KATELLA AVENUE) ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: The Shopoff Group, L.P. 2 Park Plaza, Suite 700 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 231-5068 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 553-0666 Project No. SHP1201 ---PAGE BREAK--- P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 8 OPENING YEAR (2016) BASELINE CONDITIONS 11 PROJECT IMPACTS 15 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS 15 OPENING YEAR (2016) PLUS PROJECT CONDITION 22 SPECIAL ISSUES 22 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS 29 RECOMMENDED CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS 29 CONCLUSION 31 APPENDICES A: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS B: ICU LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS C: CALTRANS METHODOLOGY LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS D: MITIGATED LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ---PAGE BREAK--- P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/25/12» ii FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 1: Project Site and Study Area Intersections 2
Figure 2: Site Plan 4
Figure 3: Existing Intersection Geometrics and Traffic Control Devices 5
Figure 4: Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes 9
Figure 5: Approved/Pending Projects Location 12
Figure 6: Approved/Pending Projects Trip Assignment 14
Figure 7: Opening Year (2016) Conditions Traffic Volumes 16
Figure 8: Proposed Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 19
Figure 9: Existing Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 20
Figure 10: Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 23
Figure 11: Connector Road and Driveway - Opening Year (2016) Project Traffic Volumes 25
Figure 12: Lewis Street/Northerly Connector Road Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak Hour Warrant 27
Figure 13: Easterly Connector Road/Katella Avenue Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak Hour Warrant 28
TABLES Table A: Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary 10
Table B: Cumulative Projects Trip Generation 13
Table C: Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary 17
Table D: Project Trip Generation 18
Table E: Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary 21
Table F: Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary 24
Table G: Caltrans Methodology Level of Service Summary 30
---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 1 PLATINUM GATEWAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (805 AND 915 EAST KATELLA AVENUE) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS UPDATE LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) has prepared the following update to the previous Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by KHR Associates in January 2008, to identify the potential traffic impacts resulting from the development of the revised Platinum Gateway project. LSA has prepared this update consistent with the City of Anaheim’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies and with applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project site consists of approximately 7.9 acres (ac) located at 805 and 917 East Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim (City), California. The project proposes the development of 399 residential apartments. This study analyzes the a.m. and p.m. peak-hour levels of service (LOS) at study area intersections. Project impacts were evaluated for the following scenarios: • 1. Existing (2008) conditions • 2. Existing (2008) plus project conditions • 3. Project Opening (2016) conditions • 4. Project Opening (2016) plus project conditions Based on the results of this traffic study, the proposed project would significantly impact the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue, which impact can be mitigated by widening Katella Avenue to its ultimate width (4 westbound lanes) along the project frontage. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this update to the previous traffic impact analysis (prepared by KHR, January 2008) is to identify potential traffic and circulation impacts associated with the development of the revised Platinum Gateway project. Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed project, and the study area intersections analyzed in this report. Issues addressed in this analysis include off-site intersection impacts, site access, and interface with the arterial street system. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 57 KATELLA AVE GENE AUTRY WAY HOWELL AVE STATE COLLEGE BLVD LEWIS ST ANAHEIM WAY MANCHESTER AVE PROJECT SITE FIGURE 1 Platinum Gateway NO SCALE N Project Site and Study Area Intersections I:\SHP1201\G\Gateway\Study Area Intersections.cdr (7/6/12) 8 LEGEND - Study Area Intersection 8 5 7 6 4 3 2 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 3 The traffic analysis for the proposed project examines four scenarios: 1. Existing (2008) conditions 2. Existing (2008) plus project conditions 3. Project Opening (2016) conditions 4. Project Opening (2016) plus project conditions Prior to preparation of this traffic analysis, LSA discussed the scope of work with the City Traffic Engineering staff. The traffic analysis provides an assessment of traffic impacts and a determination of traffic mitigation as required for CEQA compliance. Project Description The project site consists of approximately 7.9 ac located at 805 and 917 East Katella Avenue in Anaheim, California. The property is located within the Platinum Triangle District of the City. The project proposes the development of 399 residential apartments. Figure 2 illustrates the site plan of the proposed project. Primary access to the project site will be provided via a full access driveway (Connector Road) along Lewis Street located north of the project and a right-in/right-out access driveway (Connector Road) along Katella Avenue located east of the project. The north and east Connector Roads along the northerly and easterly boundaries of the project site, will not only provide access and circulation to the project site, but to the adjacent properties to the north and east as well. METHODOLOGY This update to the previous traffic impact analysis is prepared consistent with the objectives and requirements of the City’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies and applicable provisions of CEQA. Consistent with the previous KHR study and confirmed with the City Traffic Engineering staff, the study area analyzed in this report includes the following intersections. Figure 3 provides the existing geometrics and traffic control devices at each study area intersection. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIGURE 2 Platinum Gateway Site Plan P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Site Plan .xls (8/21/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave 2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave 3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave 6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave FIGURE 3 Legend Platinum Gateway Signal Existing Intersection Geometrics and Traffic Control Devices Stop Sign aaccc age cccde abccd ccce aaccc ccce accce xvt accd aaccce xvt xzt ccce ccce accce ad aaccd ade accd aaccde wtt aaccd age ace accd ccce F Free Right Turn F F P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Geo_Exist.xls (9/25/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 6 Study Area Intersections • Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound ramps-Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue • Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue • Lewis Street/Katella Avenue • State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue • Sportstown/Katella Avenue • Howell Street/Katella Avenue • State Route 57 (SR-57) southbound ramps/Katella Avenue • SR-57 northbound ramps/Katella Avenue Intersection Level of Service Methodology The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology was used to determine the LOS for the signalized study area intersections consistent with City requirements. This methodology compares the volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios of conflicting turn movements at an intersection, sums up these critical conflicting v/c ratios for each intersection approach, and determines the overall ICU. The resulting ICU is expressed in terms of LOS, where LOS A represents free-flow activity and LOS F represents overcapacity operation. LOS is a qualitative assessment of the quantitative effects of such factors as traffic volume, roadway geometrics, speed, delay, and maneuverability on roadway and intersection operations. LOS criteria for signalized intersections using the ICU methodology are presented below. ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 7 LOS Description A No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic, and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Typically, the approach appears quite open, turns are made easily, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. B This service level represents stable operation, where an occasional approach phase is fully utilized, and a substantial number are nearing full use. Many drivers begin to feel restricted within platoons of vehicles. C This level still represents stable operating conditions. Occasionally, drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication, and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted, but not objectionably so. D This level encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability at the intersection. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period; however, enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing queues, thus preventing excessive backups. E Capacity occurs at the upper end of this service level. It represents the most vehicles that any particular intersection approach can accommodate. Full utilization of every signal cycle is attained no matter how great the demand. F This level describes forced flow operations at low speeds, where volumes exceed capacity. These conditions usually result from queues of vehicles backing up from a restriction Speeds are reduced substantially, and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time due to the congestion. In the extreme case, speed can drop to zero. The relationship between LOS and the ICU value v/c ratio) is as follows: Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) A < 0.600 B 0.601–0.700 C 0.701–0.800 D 0.801–0.900 E 0.901–1.000 F > 1.000 The City considers intersections with a v/c ratio of 0.90 (LOS D) as the upper limit of satisfactory operations. Mitigation is required for any intersection where project traffic causes the intersection to deteriorate from LOS D to LOS E or F. A transportation impact on an intersection is considered significant in accordance with the following table. The “Final V/C Ratio” includes the future v/c ratio at an intersection, considering traffic from existing conditions, ambient growth, approved/related projects, and the proposed project, but without any proposed mitigation. Level of Service Final V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C C > 0.701–0.800 ≥ 0.050 D > 0.801–0.900 ≥ 0.030 E, F > 0.901 ≥ 0.010 v/c = volume-to-capacity ratio ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 8 EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Circulation System Key roadways in the vicinity of the proposed project are as follows: • Interstate 5. The I-5 freeway is located southwest of the project site and is a major freeway that extends throughout Orange County. The I-5 freeway in the project vicinity has four to five mixed- flow lanes and one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each (northbound and southbound) direction. Primary access to the project site from the I-5 freeway is provided via northbound and southbound on/off-ramps at Katella Avenue. • Katella Avenue. Katella Avenue is southern boundary of the project and provides access to the project site via a right-in/right-out driveway. This roadway is designated as an east-west Stadium Area Smart Street (eight-lane divided) in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Katella Avenue is also designated as a CMP facility. • State College Boulevard. State College Boulevard is located east of the project site. This roadway is designated as a north-south Major Arterial (six-lane divided) in the City General Plan Circulation Element. The roadway is built out to its master-planned lane geometrics. • State Route 57 (SR-57). SR-57 is located east of the project site and is a freeway that extends through Orange County. Direct access to the project site from SR-57 is provided via northbound and southbound on/off ramps at Katella Avenue. The SR-57 freeway has five mixed flow lanes and one HOV lane in each direction through Anaheim. • Lewis Street. Lewis Street is located immediately to the west of the project. Access to Lewis Street is provided at a connector road. This roadway is designated as a Secondary Arterial (four- lane undivided) in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Existing Intersection Level of Service Analysis Peak-hour turn volumes for the study area intersections were obtained from the previous KHR study which was collected in 2006 and 2007. Based on discussion with the City Traffic Engineering staff, LSA confirmed the use of the traffic counts from the previous study. Based on review of historical count data, the traffic counts along majority of the freeways, arterial and secondary streets around the Platinum Triangle Area have gone down after 2006/2007. The traffic volumes in 2011/12 have not returned to 2006/07 levels. Hence, analyzing the existing conditions using the 2006/2007 counts would present a conservative analysis. Figure 4 presents the existing a.m. and p.m. peak-hour turn movement volumes for the study area intersections. The existing traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Table A summarizes the results of the existing a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for the 8 study area intersections. The existing LOS calculation worksheets are contained in Appendix B. As Table A indicates, all study area intersections operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. ---PAGE BREAK---
832 / 1592     161 / 409 1136 / 790    626 / 402 1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave 58 / 91
882 / 1840 64 / 104   1615 / 905  2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave 4 / 50 66 / 64 134 / 96
802 / 1542
523 / 1264
933 / 1292     16 / 15     384 / 240     38 / 14 10 / 131   264 / 160   36 / 25   1411 / 858  916 / 718  981 / 903  348 / 6 204 / 84 50 / 42 3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave 460 / 171 157 / 475 170 / 399
994 / 1291  
1054 / 1065
864 / 1337     207 / 86 1023 / 1082  964 / 872    70 / 44   229 / 421 259 / 429 1076 / 1069  93 / 56 6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave FIGURE 4 XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes 72 / 101 43 / 192 452 / 202 532 / 245 23 / 106 27 / 36 5 / 28 31 / 50 4 / 4 22 / 42 518 / 426 220 / 212 359 / 858 36 / 66 13 / 9 74 / 114 160 / 246 6 / 21 59 / 104 97 / 266 869 / 722 82 / 107 246 / 102 384 / 674 151 / 71 47 / 33 43 / 48 433 / 168 395 / 881 147 / 296 64 / 91 4 / 6 57 / 16 251 / 307 5 / 1 35 / 134 P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Exist NP.xls 8/21/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. LOS V/C LOS V/C 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.380 A 0.400 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.520 B 0.650 3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue A 0.460 B 0.630 4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue A 0.570 A 0.590 5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.280 A 0.390 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.350 A 0.340 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.420 A 0.390 8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.450 A 0.490 Notes: Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study. Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008). Table A: Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions Intersection P:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\existing no project GATEWAY(9/25/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 11 OPENING YEAR (2016) BASELINE CONDITIONS According to the project applicant, the proposed residential project will be completed by 2016. Consistent with the previous KHR study, to determine a future (2016) condition, traffic volumes for other committed and/or approved (cumulative) developments were added to the existing baseline traffic volumes. In addition, a growth factor of 6 percent was added to the existing baseline traffic volumes. Consistent with the previous KHR study 14 cumulative projects were identified in the opening year (2016) condition. The following development projects are being proposed in the vicinity of the project: 1. Stadium Lofts (1,801 E. Katella Avenue): 7,839 square foot (sf) restaurants, 2,820 sf retail, 390 apartments. 2. Avalon Bay (2100 E. Katella Avenue): 261 apartments, 2,740 sf retail and 10,000 sf restaurant. 3. The Hanover Company (1818 S. State College Boulevard): 266 apartments. 4. Anavia (2045 S. State College Boulevard): 265 apartments. 5. Gateway (2150 S. State College Boulevard): 884 apartments. 6. Platinum Triangle Condominiums (1331 E. Katella Avenue): 337 condominiums. 7. Park Viridian (1515 E. Katella Avenue): 320 apartments, 451 condominiums. 8. Lennar A-Town Metro (1404 E. Katella Avenue): 2,681 residential units, and 150,000 sf of commercial use. 9. Platinum Tower (2210–2220 E. Orangewood Avenue): 591,500 sf office and 8,500 sf retail. 10. Orangewood Condominiums (2211 E. Orangewood Avenue): 325 condominiums. 11. Lennar A-Town Stadium (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue): 2,681 condominiums and 150,000 sf retail. 12. Platinum Vista (1105 E. Katella Avenue): 350 apartments. 13. Gene Autry Experience (1969 S. State College Boulevard): 1,208 condominiums, 100,000 sf office and 50,000 sf retail. 14. Alexan Orangewood (2020 and 2100 E. Orangewood Avenue): 690 apartments. Figure 5 illustrates the location of the cumulative projects. The project trip generation for the approved/pending projects was calculated using trip rates documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual (7th Edition) and is presented in Table B. LSA generally used the trip generation, distribution and assignment from the previous KHR study. Figure 6 illustrates the cumulative projects’ trip assignments. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 57 KATELLAAVE GENE AUTRY WAY HOWELL AVE STATE COLLEGE BLVD LEWIS ST ANAHEIM WAY MANCHESTER AVE PROJECT SITE FIGURE 5 Platinum Gateway NO SCALE N Approved/Pending Projects Location I:\SHP1201\G\Gateway\Approved Projects.cdr (8/20/12) 8 LEGEND - Study Area Intersection 8 5 7 6 4 3 2 1 1 7 3 2 6 8 4 5 11 9 10 13 14 12 1 2 3 4 - Stadium Lofts - Avalon Bay - Hanover Company - Anavia 5 6 7 8 - Gateway - Platinum Triangle Condos - Park Viridian - Lennar A-Town Metro 9 10 11 12 - Platinum Tower - Orangewood Condos - Lennar A-Town Stadium - Platinum Vista 13 14 - Gene Autry Experience - Alexan Orangewood ---PAGE BREAK--- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. In Out Total In Out Total 1 "Stadium Lofts" (1801 E. Katella Avenue)- Condominiums1 1,732 60 160 220 109 45 154 2 Avalon Bay "2100 at Platinum Triangle" (2100 E. Katella Avenue)-Apartments/Retails/Restaurant2 261/2.74/10 DU/TSF 3,033 105 145 250 158 114 272 3 The Hanover Company "element' (1818 S. State College Boulevard)_Apartments2 266 DU 1,721 30 119 149 102 55 157 4 Anavia (2045 S. State College Boulevard)-Apartments2 265 DU 1,715 30 119 149 102 55 157 5 Gateway" (2150 S. State College Boulevard)-Apartments2 884 DU 5,860 71 380 451 371 177 548 6 Platinum Triangle Condominiums (1331 E. Katella Avenue)-Condominiums3 337/1.300 DU/TSF 2,286 65 125 190 119 89 208 7 Park Viridian (1515 E. Katella Avenue)-Apartments/Condominiums4 320/451 DU 4,988 146 285 431 262 193 455 8 Lennar "A-Town Metro" (1404 E. Katella Avenue)-Residential/Commercial5 2,681/150.000 DU/TSF 19,418 -171 780 608 1,108 517 1,624 9 Platinum Tower (2210-2220 E. Orangewood Avenue)-Office/Retail2 591.500/8.500 TSF 9,965 1,049 133 1,182 250 1,017 1,267 10 Orangewood Condominium (2211 E. Orangewood Ave.)-Condominiums6 325 DU 2,103 62 120 182 111 81 192 11 Lennar "A-Town Stadium" (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue)-Condominium/Retail7 2,681/150.00 DU/TSF 8,941 32 371 403 485 225 710 12 Platinum Vista (1105 E. Katella Avenue)- Apartments8 350 DU 2,352 36 143 179 141 76 217 13 "Gene Autry Experience" (1969 S. State College Blvd.)-Condominiums/Office/Retail9 1,208/100/50 DU/TSF 8,607 88 328 416 436 298 734 14 "Alexan Orangewood" (2020 & 2100 E. Orangewood Avenue)-Apartments10 690 DU 2,898 -63 126 63 138 -22 116 Total Trip Generation Generation 75,619 1,540 3,334 4,873 3,892 2,920 6,811 Notes: DU: Dwelling Unit. TSF: Thousand Square Feet. 1 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Lofts Mixed-Use Development, dated September 2004. 2 Trip generation provided by City of Anaheim Traffic Engineering Staff. 3 Trlp generation based on Anaheim Transportation Analysis for the Platinum Triangle Condominium, dated June 2005. 4 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Park Residential Development, dated December 2004. 5 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Metro, dated August 2005. 6 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Orangewood Condominiums, dated September 2006. 7 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Stadium, dated June 2006. 8 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Platinum Vista, dated July 2012. 9 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Gene Autry Experience, dated February 2007. 10 Trip generation based on Alexan Orangewood Traffic Impact Study, dated January 17, 2008. Table B: Cumulative Projects Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Unit ADT P:\SHP1201\xls\Cum proj.xls ---PAGE BREAK---
266 / 272   74 / 50 152 / 295   1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave  222 / 190
362 / 332 231 / 530   2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave  18 / 0  1 / 0
117 / 406 
587 / 519     50 / 165 
95 / 576 251 / 688  116 / 112  81 / 23 334 / 308  523 / 338  295 / 216 3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave 
61 / 280
38 / 170  
91 / 570 595 / 264  220 / 106   523 / 337   121 / 73 375 / 159 6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave FIGURE 6 XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway Approved/Pending Projects Trip Assignment 23 / 110 6 / 0 3 / 3 29 / 0 30 / 290 158 / 401 0 / 1 15 / 62 128 / 156 52 / 22 3 / 103 2 / 0 74 / 280 116 / 109 62 / 26 1 / 3 165 / 0 0 / 1 P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Cumu assign.xls 9/25/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 15 Opening Year (2016) Intersection Level of Service Analysis Opening Year (2016) a.m., and p.m. peak-hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. Table C summarizes the results of the future a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all study area intersections. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B. As this table indicates, all study area intersections will continue to operate at acceptable LOS during both the peak hours. PROJECT IMPACTS Trip Generation The proposed project considers development of 399 residential apartments. The daily and peak-hour trips for the apartment use were generated using trip rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition (2003). The project trip generation is presented in Table D. As the table indicates, the proposed project has the potential to generate approximately 2,681 average daily traffic (ADT), including 203 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 247 trips in the p.m. peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution defines the regional percentage origins/destinations for a project. Trip distribution for the proposed project is based on trip distribution used in the previous KHR study. Approximately 5 percent of the trips are destined north via Lewis Street; 20 percent north via I-5; 5 percent north via State College Boulevard; 15 percent north via SR-57; 10 percent south via Lewis street; 15 percent south via I-5; 5 percent south via State College Boulevard; 10 percent south via SR-57; 5 percent west via Katella Avenue; and10 percent east via Katella Avenue. It should be noted that LSA adjusted the trip distribution along Anaheim Way and Manchester Avenue to reflect the one-way streets and actual freeway. Figure 8 shows the regional trip distribution and assignment for the proposed project. EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Traffic generated by the proposed project was added to the existing traffic volumes at the study area intersections. Figure 9 shows the resulting existing plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour traffic volumes. Existing Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Analysis Table E summarizes the results of the existing plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all study area intersections. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B. As this table indicates, all study area intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS LOS D or better) in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with implementation of the proposed project. The project will not create significant impacts at any of the study area intersections in the existing plus project condition. ---PAGE BREAK---
1164 / 1970     259 / 492 1362 / 1148    664 / 427 1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave 304 / 297
1327 / 2301 68 / 110   1954 / 1526  2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave 5 / 52 88 / 68 141 / 101
1480 / 2167
683 / 1790
1086 / 1976     17 / 16     458 / 420     40 / 15 378 / 188   403 / 286   119 / 49   1734 / 1590  1349 / 1092  1603 / 1309  10 / 6 554 / 328 52 / 44 3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave 488 / 181 165 / 499 179 / 306
1157 / 1982  
1175 / 1420
948 / 1661     220 / 91 1699 / 1415  1241 / 941    74 / 47   376 / 523 668 / 500 1708 / 1494  99 / 59 6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave FIGURE 7 XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway Opening Year (2016) Conditions Traffic Volumes 77 / 110 75 / 204 502 / 213 565 / 163 27 / 115 29 / 38 5 / 29 32 / 52 4 / 4 23 / 44 579 / 759 231 / 223 381 / 911 38 / 69 14 / 9 247 / 565 168 / 258 6 / 22 155 / 159 120 / 351 1050 / 922 139 / 135 267 / 225 408 / 715 160 / 75 52 / 35 46 / 51 539 / 479 535 / 1044 218 / 340 67 / 96 4 / 6 60 / 17 431 / 326 5 / 1 37 / 142 P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Opening Yr NP.xls 9/25/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. LOS V/C LOS V/C 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.480 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.590 C 0.750 3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue C 0.750 D 0.840 4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue C 0.780 D 0.830 5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.400 A 0.550 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.420 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.490 A 0.460 8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue B 0.660 B 0.670 Notes: Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008). Table C: Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Opening Year No Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour P:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\Opening yr no project GATEWAY(9/26/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Size Unit ADT In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rates 1 Apartment (Land Use:220) DU 6.72 0.10 0.41 0.51 0.40 0.22 0.62 Trip Generation Apartment 399 DU 2,681 41 163 203 161 87 247 Gross Project Trip Generation 2,681 41 163 204 161 87 248 Notes: 1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. DU-Dwelling Units Table D - Project Trip Generation Summary Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour P:\SHP1201\xls\Trip Generation.xls (9/24/2012) ---PAGE BREAK---
8 / 5  41 / 22 2 / 8   1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave  33 / 17
49 / 27 10 / 40   2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave  
41 / 22 
14 / 56
14 / 56 17 / 65  8 / 4  57 / 31  57 / 31  8 / 4 3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave 
8 / 32
4 / 16
14 / 56 41 / 22  17 / 9  57 / 31  16 / 19 24 / 13 6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave FIGURE 8 XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway Proposed Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 8 / 32 7 / 25 2 / 8 41 / 22 73 / 39 2 / 8 4 / 16 6 / 24 4 / 16 P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Trip Assign.xls 8/21/2012 ---PAGE BREAK---
840 / 1597     202 / 431 1138 / 798    626 / 402 1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave 91 / 108
931 / 1867 64 / 104   1625 / 945  2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave 4 / 50 66 / 64 134 / 96
843 / 1564
537 / 1320
947 / 1348     16 / 15     384 / 240     38 / 14 27 / 196   272 / 164   36 / 25   1411 / 858  973 / 749  1038 / 934  348 / 6 212 / 88 50 / 42 3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave 460 / 171 157 / 475 170 / 399
1008 / 1347  
1062 / 1097
868 / 1353     207 / 86 1064 / 1104  981 / 881    70 / 44   245 / 440 283 / 442 1133 / 1100  93 / 56 6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave FIGURE 9 XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway Existing Plus Project Condtions Traffic Volumes 72 / 101 43 / 192 456 / 218 532 / 245 23 / 106 27 / 36 5 / 28 31 / 50 4 / 4 22 / 42 524 / 450 220 / 212 359 / 858 40 / 82 13 / 9 76 / 122 201 / 268 6 / 21 132 / 143 99 / 274 869 / 722 82 / 107 253 / 127 384 / 674 151 / 71 47 / 33 43 / 48 441 / 200 395 / 881 147 / 296 64 / 91 4 / 6 57 / 16 251 / 307 5 / 1 35 / 134 P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Exist P.xls 9/25/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C V/C V/C 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.380 A 0.400 A 0.390 A 0.400 0.010 0.000 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.520 B 0.650 A 0.520 B 0.650 0.000 0.000 3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue A 0.460 B 0.630 A 0.520 B 0.670 0.060 0.040 4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue A 0.570 A 0.590 A 0.580 B 0.620 0.010 0.030 5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.280 A 0.390 A 0.290 A 0.400 0.010 0.010 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.350 A 0.340 A 0.350 A 0.350 0.000 0.010 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.420 A 0.390 A 0.420 A 0.410 0.000 0.020 8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.450 A 0.490 A 0.470 A 0.510 0.020 0.020 Notes: Significant Impact Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study. Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008). Table E: Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions Difference in V/C Ratio AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour P:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\existing plus proj GATEWAY(9/26/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 22 OPENING YEAR (2016) PLUS PROJECT CONDITION Traffic generated by the project was added to the future traffic volumes at each study area intersection. Figure 10 illustrates the resulting future plus project daily, a.m., and p.m. peak-hour traffic volumes. Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Summary Analysis Table F summarizes the results of the future plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all study area intersections. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B. As this table indicates, all study area intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS LOS D or better) in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the exception of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The project will significantly impact the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue based on the City’s significance criteria. The project will add traffic resulting in a V/C ratio change greater than the city threshold of 0.030. Mitigation measures will be identified to offset this project impact. SPECIAL ISSUES Project Access As illustrated in the site plan (Figure 2, above), access to the project site will be provided via a full- access primary connector road along Lewis Street and a right-in/right-out secondary connector road along Katella Avenue. The connector road along Lewis Street is located along northerly boundary of the project site while the connector road along Katella Avenue is located along the easterly boundary of the project site. Each connector road is approximately 26 ft wide. Access to the parking garage is provided on to the two (northerly and easterly) connector roads. These full accesses are also 26 ft wide. The easterly connector road (which connects to Katella Avenue) also provides access to the adjacent development (Platinum Vista). The proposed plans for the adjacent development shows two access driveways from the easterly connector road. Traffic generated by the proposed project and the adjacent (Platinum Vista) project was distributed along the connector roads (shown in Figure 11). Based on direction from the City, all-way stop control warrants analysis was conducted for the three access locations along the easterly connector road for both the proposed project (Platinum Gateway – one access) and the adjacent project (Platinum Vista – two access) for the Opening Year (2016) with project conditions. Criteria from section 2B.07 - Multiway Stop Applications from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), were used to determine if an all-way stop was warranted at the three locations. ---PAGE BREAK---
1172 / 1975     300 / 514 1364 / 1156    664 / 427 1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave 337 / 314
1376 / 2328 68 / 110   1964 / 1566  2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave 5 / 52 88 / 68 141 / 101
1521 / 2189
697 / 1846
1100 / 2032     17 / 16     458 / 420     40 / 15 395 / 253   411 / 290   119 / 49   1734 / 1590  1406 / 1123  1660 / 1340  10 / 6 562 / 332 52 / 44 3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave 488 / 181 165 / 499 179 / 306
1171 / 2038  
1183 / 1452
952 / 1677     220 / 91 1740 / 1437  1258 / 950    74 / 47   392 / 542 692 / 513 1765 / 1525  99 / 59 6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave FIGURE 10 XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 60 / 17 431 / 326 5 / 1 37 / 142 535 / 1044 218 / 340 67 / 96 4 / 6 160 / 75 52 / 35 46 / 51 547 / 511 274 / 250 408 / 715 381 / 911 42 / 85 14 / 9 249 / 573 209 / 280 6 / 22 228 / 198 122 / 359 1050 / 922 139 / 135 5 / 29 32 / 52 4 / 4 23 / 44 585 / 783 231 / 223 77 / 110 75 / 204 506 / 229 565 / 163 27 / 115 29 / 38 P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Opening Yr P.xls 9/25/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C V/C V/C 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.480 A 0.480 A 0.480 0.010 0.000 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.590 C 0.750 A 0.600 C 0.750 0.010 0.000 3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue C 0.750 D 0.840 D 0.820 E 0.940 0.070 0.100 4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue C 0.780 D 0.830 C 0.790 D 0.850 0.010 0.020 5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.400 A 0.550 A 0.420 A 0.560 0.020 0.010 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.420 A 0.480 A 0.420 0.010 0.000 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.490 A 0.460 A 0.500 A 0.470 0.010 0.010 8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue B 0.660 B 0.670 B 0.680 B 0.680 0.020 0.010 Notes: Significant Impact Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008). Table F: Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Opening Year No Project Conditions Opening Year Plus Project Conditions Difference in V/C Ratio AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour P:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\Opening yr plus proj GATEWAY(9/26/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- FIGURE 11 Connector Road and Driveway - Opening Year (2016) Project Traffic Volumes N Platinum Gateway I:\SHP1201\G\Gateway\Driveway Volumes.cdr (7/9/12) NO SCALE LEGEND - AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes XX/YY KATELLA AVE LEWIS ST PROJECT SITE 30/16 31/17 91/49 10/5 6/22 6/25 2/8 6/25 4/18 91/49 14/54 12/46 33/131 12/46 17/67 42/164 46/24 25/14 8/4 206/110 47/25 25/13 18/72 vv 123/65 v 22/52 80/58 v 16/64 v 28/77 35/139 v 92/104 v 127/83 v v 47/65 v 35/18 ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 26 Per MUTCD, the following criteria should be considered for multiway STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. Such crashes include right-and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum Volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but 3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 65 km/h or exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the above values. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Based on the peak hour volume (less than 150), the three intersections do not satisfy the peak hour traffic signal warrant. Therefore, the intersections do not satisfy criteria A. Since, all these intersections will be built in the future; currently there is no accident data available. Hence, criteria B is not applicable. Based on the projected peak hour volumes along the easterly connector and at the three intersections (less than 150) the minimum volume (criteria C) is not satisfied. Since, criteria B is not applicable, criteria D (which is based on criteria B) is also not applicable. Based on the above discussion, all-way stop control is not recommended at the three intersections along the easterly connector. The intersections should be controlled by stop sign at the project accesses with uncontrolled traffic operation along the easterly connector. Additionally, traffic signal warrants analysis was conducted at the locations where the connector roads intersect Lewis Street and Katella Avenue for the Opening Year (2016) with project conditions. The peak hour volume at the connector intersections is low (see Figures 12 and 13) and they do not satisfy the peak hour signal warrant (warrant Hence, a signal is not recommended in the Opening Year (2016) conditions. ---PAGE BREAK--- FIGURE 12
AM PEAK HOUR  PM PEAK HOUR XX/YY- Major Street Volume/Minor Street Volume Platinum Gateway Lewis Street/Northerly Connector Road SOURCE:CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, FIGURE 4C-3 Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak Hour Warrant (750, 214) (748, 114) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 [PHONE REDACTED] 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 SIGNAL WARRANT 3 MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH 2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor) 2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor) OR 1 LANE (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor) 1 LANE (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor) 150 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approaching with one lane.  P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Traffic Warrant1 .xls (8/21/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- FIGURE 13
AM PEAK HOUR  PM PEAK HOUR XX/YY- Major Street Volume/Minor Street Volume Platinum Gateway Easterly Connector Road/East Katella Avenue SOURCE:CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, FIGURE 4C-3 Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak Hour Warrant 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 [PHONE REDACTED] 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 SIGNAL WARRANT 3 MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH 2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor) 2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor) OR 1 LANE (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor) 1 LANE (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor) 150 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approaching with one lane.  (3827, 91) (4212, 49) P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Traffic Warrant2 .xls (8/21/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 29 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002), LOS at an intersection is analyzed utilizing the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology. Traffix Version 8.0 computer software was used to determine the LOS at Caltrans intersections based on the HCM methodology. Based on Caltrans traffic impact study guidelines, Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D on State highway facilities. However, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS. The correlation between LOS and delay is presented below. LOS HCM Signalized Intersections A < 10.0 seconds B > 10.0 and < 20.0 seconds C > 20.0 and < 35.0 seconds D > 35.0 and < 55.0 seconds E > 55.0 and < 80.0 seconds F > 80.0 seconds Consistent with Caltrans methodology, intersection LOS at four State facilities were analyzed using the HCM 2000 methodology for the existing, and opening year (2016) (with and without project) conditions. The following study area intersections were included in this analysis: • Manchester Avenue/I-5 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue • Anaheim Way/I-5 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue • SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue • SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Table G summarizes the results of the existing, and opening year (2016) (with and without project) a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for the signalized intersections identified above utilizing the HCM methodology. The existing and opening year (2016) (with and without project) LOS calculation worksheets, utilizing the HCM methodology, are contained in Appendix C. Based on the Caltrans methodology, all State facilities are forecast to operate at LOS D or better in the existing and opening year (2016) (with and without project) conditions. RECOMMENDED CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed project, consisting of 399 apartments, would exceed the City’s performance criteria at one study area intersections in the opening year (2016) horizon. The following geometric improvements at the impacted study area intersections would improve the ICU and/or reduce the ICU to the baseline condition. The LOS worksheets at each location are provided in Appendix D. ---PAGE BREAK--- LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue B 16.5 B 13.3 B 17.3 B 14.2 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue B 15.5 B 18.9 B 15.5 B 18.9 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 16.3 B 14.8 B 16.4 B 15.1 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 17.3 A 9.6 B 17.3 A 9.4 LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay 1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue B 18.9 B 19.4 B 19.6 C 20.1 2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue B 14.8 B 19.1 B 14.8 B 19.2 6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 15.0 B 18.5 B 15.0 B 18.7 7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 17.0 A 7.6 B 16.9 A 7.9 Notes: HCM Delay ratio is used for signalized intersections in the City of Anaheim. Significant Impact Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study. Table G: Caltrans Methodology Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Opening Year No Project Conditions Intersection Opening Year Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions P:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\GATEWAY HCM(9/25/2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 31 Opening Year (2016) Conditions Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The proposed project will increase the LOS at the intersection from LOS C to LOS D with an ICU increase of greater than 0.03 at LOS D in the a.m. peak and from LOS D to LOS E with an ICU increase of greater than 0.01 in p.m. peak hour during the Opening Year (2016) condition. The addition of a fourth lane in the westbound direction would offset the project’s impact at this intersection during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The recommended improvement will decrease the Opening Year (2016) ICU and LOS from 0.82 (LOS D) to 0.720 (LOS C) in the a.m. peak hour and LOS from 0.94 (LOS E) to 0.79 (LOS C) in the p.m. peak hour. Widening Katella Avenue to its ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will provide the additional westbound through lane at the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The widening of Katella Avenue (4 lanes in the westbound direction) is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and is funded by the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District (CFD). The construction of this widening project will begin in the first quarter of 2013 and is scheduled to complete in 9 months. CONCLUSION Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed development of 399 apartments can be implemented and continue to maintain satisfactory mobility and circulation system performance. Evaluation of intersection LOS shows that the addition of the project traffic to the opening year (2016) baseline traffic volumes will significantly impact the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue, according to the City’s performance criteria. The widening of Katella Avenue to its ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will mitigate the project impacts. Widening of Katella Avenue is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements which will be constructed before the construction of the project. The internal intersections along the easterly connector road do not satisfy multiway stop control criteria. Stop sign should only be installed at the project accesses and the traffic along easterly connector should be uncontrolled. Also, the intersections of the northerly connector with Lewis Street and easterly connector with Katella Avenue do not satisfy peak hour traffic signal warrants. Hence, traffic signals are not recommended at these locations and the connector approaches should be controlled by a stop sign. ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» APPENDIX A EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» APPENDIX B ICU LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 1 North/South Roadway: Manchester Avenue East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.5 2,550 43 48 0.02 * 0.02 * 1.5 2,550 43 48 0.02 * 0.02 * NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 NBR 1.5 2,550 433 168 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 441 200 0.00 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 47 33 0.01 0.01 2.0 3,400 47 33 0.01 0.01 SBT 2.0 3,400 151 71 0.04 * 0.02 * 2.0 3,400 151 71 0.04 * 0.02 * SBR 1.0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,136 790 0.22 * 0.15 3.0 5,100 1,138 798 0.22 * 0.16 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 626 402 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 626 402 0.00 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 161 409 0.05 * 0.12 2.0 3,400 202 431 0.06 * 0.13 WBT 3.0 5,100 832 1,592 0.16 0.31 * 3.0 5,100 840 1,597 0.16 0.31 * WBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.04 E/W Critical Movements 0.27 0.31 0.28 0.31 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.38 0.40 ICU 0.39 0.40 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.5 2,550 46 51 0.02 * 0.02 * 1.5 2,550 46 51 0.02 * 0.02 * NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 NBR 1.5 0 2,550 539 479 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 547 511 0.00 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 52 35 0.02 0.01 2.0 3,400 52 35 0.02 0.01 SBT 2.0 3,400 160 75 0.05 * 0.02 * 2.0 3,400 160 75 0.05 * 0.02 * SBR 1.0 0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,362 1,148 0.27 * 0.23 3.0 5,100 1,364 1,156 0.27 * 0.23 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 664 427 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 664 427 0.00 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 259 492 0.08 * 0.14 2.0 3,400 300 514 0.09 * 0.15 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,164 1,970 0.23 0.39 * 3.0 5,100 1,172 1,975 0.23 0.39 * WBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.04 E/W Critical Movements 0.35 0.39 0.36 0.39 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.47 0.48 ICU 0.48 0.48 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 2 North/South Roadway: Anaheim Avenue East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.5 2,550 384 674 0.15 * 0.26 * 1.5 2,550 384 674 0.15 * 0.26 * NBT 3.0 5,100 359 858 0.07 0.17 3.0 5,100 359 858 0.07 0.17 NBR 0.5 850 246 102 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 253 127 0.00 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 64 104 0.02 0.03 * 2.0 3,400 64 104 0.02 0.03 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,615 905 0.32 * 0.18 3.0 5,100 1,625 945 0.32 * 0.19 EBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 WBT 3.5 5,950 882 1,840 0.15 0.31 * 3.5 5,950 931 1,867 0.16 0.31 * WBR 1.5 0 2,550 58 91 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 91 108 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.15 0.26 0.15 0.26 E/W Critical Movements 0.32 0.34 0.32 0.34 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.52 0.65 ICU 0.52 0.65 Level of Service (LOS) A B Level of Service (LOS) A B LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.5 2,550 408 715 0.16 * 0.28 * 1.5 2,550 408 715 0.16 * 0.28 * NBT 3.0 5,100 381 911 0.07 0.18 3.0 5,100 381 911 0.07 0.18 NBR 0.5 0 850 267 225 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 274 250 0.00 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 68 110 0.02 0.03 * 2.0 3,400 68 110 0.02 0.03 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,954 1,526 0.38 * 0.30 3.0 5,100 1,964 1,566 0.39 * 0.31 EBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 WBT 3.5 5,950 1,327 2,301 0.22 0.39 * 3.5 5,950 1,376 2,328 0.23 0.39 * WBR 1.5 0 2,550 304 297 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 337 314 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.16 0.28 0.16 0.28 E/W Critical Movements 0.38 0.42 0.39 0.42 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.59 0.75 ICU 0.60 0.75 Level of Service (LOS) A C Level of Service (LOS) A C Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 3 North/South Roadway: Lewis Street East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02 NBT 0.5 850 36 66 0.04 * 0.08 * 0.5 850 40 82 0.05 * 0.10 * NBR 0.5 850 13 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 13 9 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,700 59 104 0.03 * 0.06 * 1.0 1,700 132 143 0.08 * 0.08 * SBT 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01 SBR 1.0 1,700 160 246 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 201 268 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 10 131 0.01 0.08 * 1.0 1,700 27 196 0.02 0.12 * EBT 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 * 0.20 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 * 0.20 EBR 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 * 0.01 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 * 0.01 WBT 2.5 4,250 802 1,542 0.19 0.36 * 2.5 4,250 843 1,564 0.20 0.37 * WBR 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.07 0.14 0.13 0.18 E/W Critical Movements 0.34 0.44 0.34 0.49 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.46 0.63 ICU 0.52 0.67 Level of Service (LOS) A B Level of Service (LOS) A B LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02 NBT 0.5 850 38 69 0.04 * 0.08 * 0.5 850 42 85 0.05 * 0.10 * NBR 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,700 155 159 0.09 * 0.09 * 1.0 1,700 228 198 0.13 * 0.12 * SBT 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01 SBR 1.0 0 1,700 168 258 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 209 280 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 378 188 0.22 * 0.11 * 1.0 1,700 395 253 0.23 * 0.15 * EBT 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37 EBR 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01 WBT 2.5 4,250 1,480 2,167 0.35 * 0.51 * 2.5 4,250 1,521 2,189 0.36 * 0.52 * WBR 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.22 E/W Critical Movements 0.57 0.62 0.59 0.67 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.75 0.84 ICU 0.82 0.94 Level of Service (LOS) C D Level of Service (LOS) D E Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 4 North/South Roadway: State College Blvd East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 2.0 3,400 74 114 0.02 * 0.03 2.0 3,400 76 122 0.02 * 0.04 NBT 2.5 4,250 395 881 0.09 0.21 * 3.0 5,100 395 881 0.11 0.23 * NBR 0.5 850 147 296 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 147 296 0.00 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 82 107 0.02 0.03 * 2.0 3,400 82 107 0.02 0.03 * SBT 3.0 5,100 869 722 0.17 * 0.14 3.0 5,100 869 722 0.17 * 0.14 SBR 1.0 1,700 97 266 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 99 274 0.00 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 264 160 0.08 0.05 * 2.0 3,400 272 164 0.08 0.05 * EBT 2.5 4,250 916 718 0.22 * 0.17 2.5 4,250 973 749 0.23 * 0.18 EBR 1.5 0 2,550 204 84 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 212 88 0.00 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 384 240 0.11 * 0.07 2.0 3,400 384 240 0.11 * 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 523 1,264 0.10 0.25 * 3.0 5,100 537 1,320 0.11 0.26 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 66 64 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 66 64 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.19 0.24 0.19 0.26 E/W Critical Movements 0.33 0.30 0.34 0.31 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.57 0.59 ICU 0.58 0.62 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A B LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 2.0 3,400 247 565 0.07 * 0.17 * 2.0 3,400 249 573 0.07 * 0.17 * NBT 3.0 5,100 535 1,044 0.15 0.27 3.0 5,100 535 1,044 0.15 0.27 NBR 0.0 0 218 340 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 218 340 0.00 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 139 135 0.04 0.04 2.0 3,400 139 135 0.04 0.04 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,050 922 0.21 * 0.18 * 3.0 5,100 1,050 922 0.21 * 0.18 * SBR 1.0 0 1,700 120 351 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 122 359 0.00 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 403 286 0.12 0.08 * 2.0 3,400 411 290 0.12 0.09 * EBT 2.5 4,250 1,349 1,092 0.32 * 0.26 2.5 4,250 1,406 1,123 0.33 * 0.26 EBR 1.5 0 2,550 554 328 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 562 332 0.00 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 458 420 0.13 * 0.12 2.0 3,400 458 420 0.13 * 0.12 WBT 3.0 5,100 683 1,790 0.13 0.35 * 3.0 5,100 697 1,846 0.14 0.36 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 88 68 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 88 68 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.35 0.28 0.35 E/W Critical Movements 0.45 0.43 0.46 0.45 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.78 0.83 ICU 0.79 0.85 Level of Service (LOS) C D Level of Service (LOS) C D Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 5 North/South Roadway: Sportstown Avenue East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 31 50 0.02 * 0.03 1.0 1,700 31 50 0.02 * 0.03 NBT 0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 * 0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 * NBR 1.5 2,550 26 46 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 26 46 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,700 35 134 0.02 0.08 * 1.0 1,700 35 134 0.02 0.08 * SBT 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 * 0.00 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 * 0.00 SBR 1.0 1,700 64 91 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 64 91 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 36 25 0.02 0.01 * 1.0 1,700 36 25 0.02 0.01 * EBT 3.0 5,100 981 903 0.19 * 0.18 3.0 5,100 1,038 934 0.20 * 0.18 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 50 42 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 50 42 0.00 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,700 38 14 0.02 * 0.01 1.0 1,700 38 14 0.02 * 0.01 WBT 3.0 5,100 933 1,292 0.18 0.25 * 3.0 5,100 947 1,348 0.19 0.26 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 134 96 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 134 96 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.26 0.22 0.27 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.28 0.39 ICU 0.29 0.40 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 32 52 0.02 * 0.03 1.0 1,700 32 52 0.02 * 0.03 NBT 0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 * 0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 * NBR 1.5 0 2,550 27 48 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 27 48 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,700 37 142 0.02 0.08 * 1.0 1,700 37 142 0.02 0.08 * SBT 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 * 0.00 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 * 0.00 SBR 1.0 0 1,700 67 96 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 67 96 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 119 49 0.07 0.03 * 1.0 1,700 119 49 0.07 0.03 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,603 1,309 0.31 * 0.26 3.0 5,100 1,660 1,340 0.33 * 0.26 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 52 44 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 52 44 0.00 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,700 40 15 0.02 * 0.01 1.0 1,700 40 15 0.02 * 0.01 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,086 1,976 0.21 0.39 * 3.0 5,100 1,100 2,032 0.22 0.40 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 141 101 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 141 101 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08 E/W Critical Movements 0.33 0.42 0.35 0.43 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.40 0.55 ICU 0.42 0.56 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 6 North/South Roadway: SR-55 Southbound Ramps East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * NBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.5 2,550 220 212 0.09 * 0.08 * 1.5 2,550 220 212 0.09 * 0.08 * SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBR 1.5 2,550 518 426 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 524 450 0.00 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,023 1,082 0.20 0.21 3.0 5,100 1,064 1,104 0.21 0.22 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 229 421 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 245 440 0.00 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,054 1,065 0.21 * 0.21 * 3.0 5,100 1,062 1,097 0.21 * 0.22 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 157 475 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 157 475 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.35 0.34 ICU 0.35 0.35 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * NBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.5 2,550 231 223 0.09 * 0.09 * 1.5 2,550 231 223 0.09 * 0.09 * SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBR 1.5 0 2,550 579 759 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 585 783 0.00 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,699 1,415 0.33 * 0.28 3.0 5,100 1,740 1,437 0.34 * 0.28 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 376 523 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 392 542 0.00 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,175 1,420 0.23 0.28 * 3.0 5,100 1,183 1,452 0.23 0.28 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 165 499 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 165 499 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 E/W Critical Movements 0.33 0.28 0.34 0.28 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.47 0.42 ICU 0.48 0.42 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 7 North/South Roadway: SR-55 Northbound Ramps East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.5 2,550 452 202 0.18 * 0.08 * 1.5 2,550 456 218 0.18 * 0.09 * NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 NBR 1.5 2,550 532 245 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 532 245 0.00 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * EBT 3.0 5,100 964 872 0.19 * 0.17 3.0 5,100 981 881 0.19 * 0.17 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 259 429 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 283 442 0.00 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 864 1,337 0.17 0.26 * 3.0 5,100 868 1,353 0.17 0.27 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 170 399 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 170 399 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.18 0.08 0.18 0.09 E/W Critical Movements 0.19 0.26 0.19 0.27 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.42 0.39 ICU 0.42 0.41 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.5 2,550 502 213 0.20 * 0.08 * 1.5 2,550 506 229 0.20 * 0.09 * NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 NBR 1.5 0 2,550 565 163 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 565 163 0.00 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 * SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * EBT 3.0 5,100 1,241 941 0.24 * 0.18 3.0 5,100 1,258 950 0.25 * 0.19 EBR 1.0 0 1,700 668 500 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 692 513 0.00 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 * 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 948 1,661 0.19 0.33 * 3.0 5,100 952 1,677 0.19 0.33 * WBR 1.0 0 1,700 179 306 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 179 306 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.20 0.08 0.20 0.09 E/W Critical Movements 0.24 0.33 0.25 0.33 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.49 0.46 ICU 0.50 0.47 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 8 North/South Roadway: Howell East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 23 106 0.01 0.06 1.0 1,700 23 106 0.01 0.06 NBT 1.0 1,700 27 36 0.02 * 0.02 * 1.0 1,700 27 36 0.02 * 0.02 * NBR 1.0 1,700 43 192 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 43 192 0.00 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 251 307 0.07 * 0.09 * 2.0 3,400 251 307 0.07 * 0.09 * SBT 0.5 850 57 16 0.07 0.02 0.5 850 57 16 0.07 0.02 SBR 0.5 850 72 101 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 72 101 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 70 44 0.04 0.03 * 1.0 1,700 70 44 0.04 0.03 * EBT 2.5 4,250 1,076 1,069 0.25 * 0.25 2.5 4,250 1,133 1,100 0.27 * 0.26 EBR 0.5 0 850 93 56 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 93 56 0.00 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 207 86 0.06 * 0.03 2.0 3,400 207 86 0.06 * 0.03 WBT 2.5 4,250 994 1,291 0.23 0.30 * 2.5 4,250 1,008 1,347 0.24 0.32 * WBR 0.5 0 850 460 171 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 460 171 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.11 E/W Critical Movements 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.35 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.45 0.49 ICU 0.47 0.51 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 27 115 0.02 0.07 1.0 1,700 27 115 0.02 0.07 NBT 1.0 1,700 29 38 0.02 * 0.02 * 1.0 1,700 29 38 0.02 * 0.02 * NBR 1.0 0 1,700 75 204 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 75 204 0.00 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 431 326 0.13 * 0.10 * 2.0 3,400 431 326 0.13 * 0.10 * SBT 0.5 850 60 17 0.07 0.02 0.5 850 60 17 0.07 0.02 SBR 0.5 0 850 77 110 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 77 110 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 74 47 0.04 0.03 * 1.0 1,700 74 47 0.04 0.03 * EBT 2.5 4,250 1,708 1,494 0.40 * 0.35 2.5 4,250 1,765 1,525 0.42 * 0.36 EBR 0.5 0 850 99 59 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 99 59 0.00 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 220 91 0.06 * 0.03 2.0 3,400 220 91 0.06 * 0.03 WBT 2.5 4,250 1,157 1,982 0.27 0.47 * 2.5 4,250 1,171 2,038 0.28 0.48 * WBR 0.5 0 850 488 181 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 488 181 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.15 0.12 0.15 0.12 E/W Critical Movements 0.46 0.50 0.48 0.51 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.66 0.67 ICU 0.68 0.68 Level of Service (LOS) B B Level of Service (LOS) B B Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» APPENDIX C CALTRANS METHODOLOGY LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Existing AM Command: Existing Volume: Existing AM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.617 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.5 Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.09 0.00 1.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1781 0 3119 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.39 0.05 0.16 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.07 0.70 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.27 0.02 0.00 0.35 0.62 0.62 0.23 0.00 Uniform Del: 42.4 0.0 34.9 48.5 37.1 35.7 0.0 8.8 11.3 44.9 5.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 1.5 14.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 4.4 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.4 62.8 37.4 35.7 0.0 8.9 12.4 49.3 5.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.4 62.8 37.4 35.7 0.0 8.9 12.4 49.3 5.3 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D D A A B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 7 2 2 0 0 6 12 3 3 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.493 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.5 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3137 3137 1568 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6854 1713 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.11 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.03 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.36 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.06 Uniform Del: 26.5 26.2 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.2 9.8 0.0 0.0 11.5 10.3 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.6 26.3 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 10.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.6 26.3 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 10.3 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D A A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 7 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 4 1 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.405 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.3 Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 229 0 1054 157 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 229 0 1054 157 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 229 0 1054 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 0 0 1054 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 0 0 1054 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 0 0 1054 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 1.70 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2174 0 2851 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.6 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A B A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:43 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.408 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.3 Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 259 0 864 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 259 0 864 170 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 259 0 864 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 0 0 864 170 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 0 0 864 170 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 0 0 864 170 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.46 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2492 0 2631 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.11 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.23 Uniform Del: 15.6 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 17.8 16.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 15.7 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 0.0 17.9 16.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.7 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 0.0 17.9 16.8 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 3 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:39 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Existing PM Command: Existing Volume: Existing PM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.455 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.3 Optimal Cycle: 23 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.22 0.00 1.78 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 2028 0 2950 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 0.12 0.31 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.00 0.13 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.26 0.80 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.30 0.06 0.00 0.28 0.45 0.45 0.38 0.00 Uniform Del: 43.4 0.0 40.6 48.4 44.5 43.8 0.0 12.1 13.6 31.3 2.8 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.0 0.7 4.5 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 43.6 0.0 41.3 52.9 45.2 44.0 0.0 12.1 14.0 31.6 2.8 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 0.0 41.3 52.9 45.2 44.0 0.0 12.1 14.0 31.6 2.8 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D D D D A B B C A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 5 8 5 5 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.534 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.68 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3214 4309 512 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6868 1717 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.05 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 Uniform Del: 23.3 23.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.0 13.1 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 23.5 23.2 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.8 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.1 13.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.5 23.2 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.8 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.1 13.1 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 9 8 8 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 10 2 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.376 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.8 Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 421 0 1065 475 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 421 0 1065 475 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 421 0 1065 475 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 0 0 1065 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 0 0 1065 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 0 0 1065 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.00 1.67 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2242 0 2806 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 21.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 21.1 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 21.1 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.369 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.6 Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 429 0 1337 399 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 429 0 1337 399 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 429 0 1337 399 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 0 0 1337 399 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 0 0 1337 399 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 0 0 1337 399 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.45 0.00 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2477 0 2641 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.25 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.35 Uniform Del: 30.5 0.0 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 6.1 6.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 30.6 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.6 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 5 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:29 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Existing Plus Project AM Command: Existing Plus Project Volume: Existing plus project AM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.632 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.3 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.09 0.00 1.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1778 0 3121 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.39 0.06 0.16 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.00 0.22 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.09 0.71 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.27 0.02 0.00 0.36 0.63 0.63 0.23 0.00 Uniform Del: 42.5 0.0 35.1 48.5 37.2 35.8 0.0 9.6 12.2 43.8 5.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 1.7 16.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.8 64.8 37.5 35.8 0.0 9.6 13.5 47.9 5.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.8 64.8 37.5 35.8 0.0 9.6 13.5 47.9 5.2 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D D A A B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 7 2 2 0 0 6 13 3 3 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.500 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.5 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3134 3134 1567 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6826 1707 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.11 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.35 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.10 Uniform Del: 26.1 25.9 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.7 10.1 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.2 26.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.2 26.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.6 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 7 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 4 1 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.409 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.4 Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 245 0 1062 157 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 245 0 1062 157 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 245 0 1062 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 0 0 1062 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 0 0 1062 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 0 0 1062 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 1.70 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2168 0 2852 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.6 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.8 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.8 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A B A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.412 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.3 Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 283 0 868 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 283 0 868 170 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 283 0 868 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 0 0 868 170 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 0 0 868 170 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 0 0 868 170 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.46 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2493 0 2625 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.11 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.49 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.23 Uniform Del: 15.8 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.1 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.4 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 15.9 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 17.7 16.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.9 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 17.7 16.5 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 3 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:06 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Existing Plus Project PM Command: Existing Plus Project Volume: Existing plus project PM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.472 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.2 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.19 0.00 1.81 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1973 0 2987 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 0.12 0.31 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.00 0.14 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.26 0.79 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.27 0.05 0.00 0.29 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 42.5 0.0 39.5 48.5 43.9 43.2 0.0 13.2 14.9 31.2 3.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.0 0.7 5.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 42.6 0.0 40.1 53.4 44.5 43.4 0.0 13.3 15.3 31.5 3.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.6 0.0 40.1 53.4 44.5 43.4 0.0 13.3 15.3 31.5 3.3 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D D D D A B B C A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 5 8 6 5 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.539 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9 Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.61 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3208 4192 620 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6861 1715 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.06 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.53 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.12 Uniform Del: 23.6 23.4 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.1 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 23.8 23.6 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.0 13.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.8 23.6 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.0 13.1 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 9 9 9 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 10 2 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.391 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.1 Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 440 0 1097 475 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 440 0 1097 475 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 440 0 1097 475 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 0 0 1097 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 0 0 1097 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 0 0 1097 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 0.00 1.68 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2217 0 2820 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.3 0.0 20.8 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 21.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 21.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.366 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.4 Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 442 0 1353 399 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 442 0 1353 399 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 442 0 1353 399 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 0 0 1353 399 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 0 0 1353 399 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 0 0 1353 399 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.47 0.00 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2515 0 2614 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.25 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.71 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.35 Uniform Del: 31.9 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.5 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 32.1 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 32.1 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.7 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 5 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Future No Project AM Command: Future Volume: Future AM Geometry: Future Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Future Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.707 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9 Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.08 0.00 1.92 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1760 0 3134 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.07 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.00 0.24 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.10 0.69 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.27 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.71 0.71 0.33 0.00 Uniform Del: 41.8 0.0 34.6 48.6 36.4 34.9 0.0 11.9 14.9 43.3 6.4 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 2.8 27.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.5 6.2 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 41.8 0.0 37.4 75.7 36.6 34.9 0.0 12.0 17.4 49.5 6.4 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.8 0.0 37.4 75.7 36.6 34.9 0.0 12.0 17.4 49.5 6.4 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D C A B B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 9 2 2 0 0 9 15 4 5 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.576 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.8 Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3134 3134 1567 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6722 1681 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.18 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.41 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.30 Uniform Del: 28.5 28.2 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.2 9.6 0.0 0.0 10.2 10.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 28.6 28.3 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 10.2 10.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.6 28.3 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 10.2 10.0 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D A A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 5 8 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 5 5 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.557 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.0 Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 376 0 1175 165 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 376 0 1175 165 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 376 0 1175 165 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 0 0 1175 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 0 0 1175 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 0 0 1175 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.29 0.00 1.71 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2150 0 2869 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 25.5 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 26.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 26.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A C A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 11 0 0 7 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.479 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.0 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 668 0 948 179 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 668 0 948 179 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 668 0 948 179 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 0 0 948 179 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 0 0 948 179 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 0 0 948 179 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.47 0.00 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2514 0 2615 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.11 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.22 Uniform Del: 18.8 0.0 19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 14.1 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 19.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 15.4 14.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 19.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 15.4 14.2 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 3 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:44 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Future No Project PM Command: Future Volume: Future PM Geometry: Future Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Future Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.599 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.4 Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.10 0.00 1.90 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1791 0 3110 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.15 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.26 0.14 0.38 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.23 0.68 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.18 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.56 0.00 Uniform Del: 36.5 0.0 32.6 48.8 39.9 39.3 0.0 20.0 21.2 34.1 8.5 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.4 1.2 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 36.5 0.0 33.8 64.8 40.2 39.3 0.0 20.2 22.6 35.3 8.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.5 0.0 33.8 64.8 40.2 39.3 0.0 20.2 22.6 35.3 8.7 0.0 LOS by Move: D A C E D D A C C D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 8 1 1 0 0 9 10 7 11 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.633 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.1 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.93 2.46 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3089 3936 972 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6798 1700 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.17 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.33 Uniform Del: 26.2 26.2 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 12.2 0.0 0.0 16.4 13.1 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.6 26.6 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 16.7 13.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.6 26.6 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 16.7 13.1 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 11 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 13 5 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.559 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.5 Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 523 0 1420 499 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 523 0 1420 499 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 523 0 1420 499 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 0 0 1420 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 0 0 1420 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 0 0 1420 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.77 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2038 0 2945 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 19.6 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 20.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 20.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 10 0 11 0 0 11 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.420 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.6 Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 500 0 1661 306 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 500 0 1661 306 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 500 0 1661 306 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 0 0 1661 306 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 0 0 1661 306 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 0 0 1661 306 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.57 0.00 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2705 0 2475 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.19 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 Volume/Cap: 0.42 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25 Uniform Del: 35.8 0.0 35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.5 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 36.1 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 4.2 3.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.1 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 4.2 3.6 LOS by Move: D A D A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 3 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Future Plus Project AM Command: Future Plus Project Volume: Future plus project AM Geometry: Future Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Future Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.722 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.6 Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.08 0.00 1.92 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1758 0 3136 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.09 0.23 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.00 0.24 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.12 0.69 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.27 0.02 0.00 0.46 0.72 0.72 0.33 0.00 Uniform Del: 41.8 0.0 34.8 48.7 36.5 35.0 0.0 12.6 15.8 42.5 6.3 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 3.2 29.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.8 6.1 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 41.9 0.0 38.0 78.6 36.7 35.0 0.0 12.7 18.6 48.6 6.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.9 0.0 38.0 78.6 36.7 35.0 0.0 12.7 18.6 48.6 6.3 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D C A B B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 9 2 2 0 0 9 16 5 5 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.583 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.8 Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3130 3130 1565 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6709 1677 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.20 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.41 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.34 Uniform Del: 28.1 27.9 29.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.4 9.9 0.0 0.0 10.4 10.3 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 28.3 28.0 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.5 10.1 0.0 0.0 10.4 10.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.3 28.0 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.5 10.1 0.0 0.0 10.4 10.4 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 5 8 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 6 6 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.568 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.0 Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 392 0 1183 165 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 392 0 1183 165 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 392 0 1183 165 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 0 0 1183 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 0 0 1183 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 0 0 1183 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 0.00 1.72 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2144 0 2869 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 25.8 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 26.3 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 26.3 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A C A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 12 0 0 7 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.483 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.9 Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 692 0 952 179 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 692 0 952 179 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 692 0 952 179 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 0 0 952 179 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 0 0 952 179 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 0 0 952 179 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.47 0.00 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2517 0 2612 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.11 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.22 Uniform Del: 19.1 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 0.0 15.2 13.9 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 19.2 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 14.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 19.2 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 14.1 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 3 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:29 Page 1-1 Scenario Report Scenario: Future Plus Project PM Command: Future Plus Project Volume: Future plus project PM Geometry: Future Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: None Trip Distribution: None Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Future Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 2-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.616 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.1 Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.09 0.00 1.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1782 0 3119 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.16 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.26 0.15 0.38 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.00 0.27 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.24 0.67 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.17 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.17 0.03 0.00 0.52 0.62 0.62 0.57 0.00 Uniform Del: 36.0 0.0 32.2 48.9 39.7 39.0 0.0 21.0 22.1 34.0 8.9 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 1.3 18.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.7 1.4 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 36.0 0.0 33.5 67.5 39.9 39.0 0.0 21.2 23.8 35.4 9.1 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.0 0.0 33.5 67.5 39.9 39.0 0.0 21.2 23.8 35.4 9.1 0.0 LOS by Move: D A C E D D A C C D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 8 1 1 0 0 10 11 7 12 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.641 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.2 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.90 2.43 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3045 3880 1065 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6792 1698 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.18 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.35 Uniform Del: 26.2 26.2 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.7 12.4 0.0 0.0 16.5 13.3 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.7 26.7 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.6 12.6 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.7 26.7 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.6 12.6 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.3 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 11 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 13 6 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.574 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.7 Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 542 0 1452 499 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 542 0 1452 499 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 542 0 1452 499 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 0 0 1452 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 0 0 1452 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 0 0 1452 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.78 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2027 0 2951 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 19.7 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 20.1 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 20.1 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 10 0 11 0 0 11 0 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.428 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9 Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 513 0 1677 306 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 513 0 1677 306 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 513 0 1677 306 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 0 0 1677 306 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 0 0 1677 306 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 0 0 1677 306 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.58 0.00 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2744 0 2453 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.19 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.25 Uniform Del: 35.4 0.0 34.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.4 3.7 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 35.7 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 3.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.7 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 3.8 LOS by Move: D A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 3 Traffix 8.0.0715 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E P L A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» APPENDIX D MITIGATED LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ---PAGE BREAK--- Intersection Number: 3 North/South Roadway: Lewis Street East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02 NBT 0.5 850 36 66 0.04 * 0.08 * 0.5 850 40 82 0.05 * 0.10 * NBR 0.5 850 13 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 13 9 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,700 59 104 0.03 * 0.06 * 1.0 1,700 132 143 0.08 * 0.08 * SBT 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01 SBR 1.0 1,700 160 246 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 201 268 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 10 131 0.01 0.08 * 1.0 1,700 27 196 0.02 0.12 * EBT 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 * 0.20 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 * 0.20 EBR 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 * 0.01 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 * 0.01 WBT 3.5 5,950 802 1,542 0.13 0.26 * 3.5 5,950 843 1,564 0.14 0.26 * WBR 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.07 0.14 0.13 0.18 E/W Critical Movements 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.38 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.46 0.53 ICU 0.52 0.61 Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A B LSA Associates Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM NBL 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02 NBT 0.5 850 38 69 0.04 * 0.08 * 0.5 850 42 85 0.05 * 0.10 * NBR 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,700 155 159 0.09 * 0.09 * 1.0 1,700 228 198 0.13 * 0.12 * SBT 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01 SBR 1.0 0 1,700 168 258 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 209 280 0.00 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,700 378 188 0.22 * 0.11 * 1.0 1,700 395 253 0.23 * 0.15 * EBT 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37 EBR 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01 WBT 3.5 5,950 1,480 2,167 0.25 * 0.36 * 3.5 5,950 1,521 2,189 0.26 * 0.37 * WBR 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.22 E/W Critical Movements 0.47 0.47 0.49 0.52 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.65 0.69 ICU 0.72 0.79 Level of Service (LOS) B B Level of Service (LOS) C C Right Turn Conditions: P - Protected right turn movement U - Unprotected right turn movement N - No right turn on red F - Free right turn lane Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis ---PAGE BREAK---        3/$11,1*$33/,&$7,2112   3$5&(//27180%(5 6  $66(662563$5&(/180%(5 6  352-(&76,7($''5(66   3UHSDUHGIRU  3DUN3OD]D6XLWH ,UYLQH&$  3UHSDUHGE\  (GZDUG72XQH3(46' +DOO )RUHPDQ,QF (WK6WUHHW6XLWH                 (GZDUG72XQH 3UHSDUHG 2FWREHU 1RYHPEHU    ---PAGE BREAK---  ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ,ĂůůΘ&ŽƌĞŵĂŶ͕/ŶĐ͘  WĂŐĞŝ   —–‹˜‡—ƒ”›ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ͝ ‰”‘—†ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ͝Ǧ͟ —••‹‘ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤ Ž—•‹‘ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ͝͞ ͝Ǥ ͞Ǥ ͟Ǥ ͠Ǥ ͡Ǥ ͢Ǥ ͣǤ ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϭ V\VWHP DQGIHHWDORQJ/HZLV6WQRUWKRI.DWHOOD$YH VIRIILFH RI +DUERU%OYGLQDVHZHUPDLQ ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD Ϯ SRUWLRQRIWKHIRUFHPDLQWKDWZRXOGEHLQWKHVWUHHWULJKWRIZD\ %OYG ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϯ ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϰ   6HH7DEOH  ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϱ 3/$11,1*$5($6&2175,%87,1*723/$7,180*$7(:$< 9,67$ 352-(&71$0( JSG JSG JSG  FIV  'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV 7\SH RI%HGURRP 8QLWV DND./3URSHUW\  DND 0DUVKDOO3URSHUW\  6XE7RWDO   DND./3URSHUW\  7RWDO  1RWH %\7RWDO1XPEHURI %HGURRPV ./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV  ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϲ 352-(&71$0( JSG JSG JSG  'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV 7\SHRI %HGURRP8QLWV    DND 2QO\ KDYHEHHQ 7RWDO  1R &RPPHUFLDO 7RWDO  /HQQDU V$7RZQ 0HWUR :ULJKW&LUFOH 7RWDO  1RWH %\7RWDO1XPEHURI %HGURRPV ./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI%HGURRPV  ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϳ  5HIHUWR7DEOHV PRGHODUHD% 7RWDO ϭϳϬ͕ϳϵϲŐƉĚͲϳϮϴ͕ϱϬϴŐƉĚс Ͳϱϱϳ͕ϳϭϮŐƉĚ  3/$11,1*$5($6&2175,%87,1*723/$7,180*$7(:$<21/< 352-(&71$0( JSG JSG JSG  'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV 7\SH RI%HGURRP 8QLWV DND./3URSHUW\  DND./3URSHUW\  6XE7RWDO  1RWH %\7RWDO1XPEHURI %HGURRPV ./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV   ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϴ ,1&/8',1*3/$7,180 6,7( 352-(&71$0( JSG JSG JSG  )8785(  &216758&7(' 'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV 7\SHRI %HGURRP8QLWV JSG  FIV   DND 2QO\ KDYHEHHQ 7RWDO  1R &RPPHUFLDO 7RWDO %XLOGRXW  /HQQDU V$7RZQ 0HWUR 2QO\RI WDEOHGWR0RGHO$UHD  6KHG% :ULJKW&LUFOH 7RWDO  6LWHV  0DLQLQ.DWHOOD$YH  1RWH %\7RWDO1XPEHURI %HGURRPV ./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϵ %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI%HGURRPV  WKHIORZUDWHVRIJSG 6HH7DEOH IRUWKHPRGHODUHD  %DOVRLQFOXGHVWKH0DUVKDOO 9LVWD SURSHUW\DQGDSRUWLRQRIWKH./ SURSHUW\ 6HH7DEOH  IODWVVIUHWDLO /HQQDU V$7RZQ0HWUR 0DUVKDOO3URSHUW\DND9LVWD  PRGHODUHD%  ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϭϬ  $YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW JSG  $YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW $YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW JSG 6HH7DEOH JSG $YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW  JSG $YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW 6HH7DEOH  VHH7DEOH 6HH7DEOH  9LVWD ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϭϭ  FIV JSG WKUHVKROGDQG9 ---PAGE BREAK---   ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD ϭϮ     ---PAGE BREAK---     dd,D Edϭ  ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d ^ t E Zd/KEZd >>/E'hE/d^Ϳ dd,D Edηϭ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ h WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y sŝƐƚĂ ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ ϯϱϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϮϭ͕Ϯϳϱ Ϭ͘ϭϮϭϯ Ϭ͘ϭϴϳϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϰ͕ϭϰϰ Ϭ͘ϯϵϰϭ Ϭ͘ϲϬϵϴ 'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϭϯϯ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϰϲ͕Ϭϴϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϲϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϭϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϰϵ͕ϳϳϱ Ϭ͘ϭϰϵϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϯϭϳ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ Ϯϲϲ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϵϮ͕ϭϲϵ Ϭ͘ϬϵϮϮ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵϵ͕ϱϰϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϵϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϲϯϱ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϵϵ ϭϯϴ͕Ϯϱϰ Ϭ͘ϭϯϴϯ Ϭ͘Ϯϭϯϵ ϰϰϵ͕ϯϮϰ Ϭ͘ϰϰϵϯ Ϭ͘ϲϵϱϮ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ϳϰϵ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ Ϯϱϵ͕ϱϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϱϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϰϯ͕ϰϲϴ Ϭ͘ϴϰϯϱ ϭ͘ϯϬϱϬ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;&ůŽǁŝŶŐ ĂƐƚͿ ϰϴϯ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϲϳ͕ϯϲϬ Ϭ͘ϭϲϳϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϱϴϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϰϯ͕ϵϭϴ Ϭ͘ϱϰϯϵ Ϭ͘ϴϰϭϲ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;&ůŽǁŝŶŐtĞƐƚͿ Ϯϲϲ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϵϮ͕ϭϲϵ Ϭ͘ϬϵϮϮ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵϵ͕ϱϰϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϵϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϲϯϱ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϳϰϵ Ϯϱϵ͕ϱϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϱϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϬϭϲ ϴϰϯ͕ϰϲϴ Ϭ͘ϴϰϯϱ ϭ͘ϯϬϱϬ WůĂƚŝŶƵŵ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͬsŝƐƚĂǀƐ͘DĂƌƐŚĂůΘ<>WůĂŶсϳϰϵͲϲϰϳснϭϬϮh ϭϬϮ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϯϱ͕ϯϰϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϱϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϰϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϰ͕ϴϲϱ Ϭ͘ϭϭϰϵ Ϭ͘ϭϳϳϳ ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲ͘ EŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJǀĞǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐϭ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϭŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---     dd,D EdϮ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d ^ t E Zd/KEZd ^;zdKd>EhD ZKKD^Ϳ dd,D EdηϮ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ h WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ WĞƌƐŽŶƐ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y sŝƐƚĂ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ϯϬ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϯϬ͘ϬϬ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϯ͕ϭϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕Ϯϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϱϴ ϭϱϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϵϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϮϬ͕Ϭϴϭ Ϭ͘ϬϮϬϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲϱ͕Ϯϲϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϱϯ Ϭ͘ϭϬϭϬ ϭϱϵ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱϳ͘ϳϱ ϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϯϳ͕ϱϲϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϳϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϴϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϮϮ͕ϬϴϮ Ϭ͘ϭϮϮϭ Ϭ͘ϭϴϴϵ ϴ ϯ͘ϯϬ Ϯϲ͘ϰϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ Ϯ͕ϳϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͕ϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϵ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϱϬ ϲϬϱ͘ϰϬ ϲϯ͕ϱϲϳ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϯϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϵϴϰ ϮϬϲ͕ϱϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϬϲϲ Ϭ͘ϯϭϵϲ 'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ϴ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϴ͘ϬϬ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϴϰϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϳϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϮ ϭϵϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϴ͘ϳϱ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ Ϯϱ͕Ϭϲϵ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϴϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϭ͕ϰϳϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϭϱ Ϭ͘ϭϮϲϭ ϭϱϮ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϰϮ͘ϬϬ ϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϯϱ͕ϵϭϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϱϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϱϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϲ͕ϳϬϴ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϳ Ϭ͘ϭϴϬϲ ϯϵ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϭϮϴ͘ϳϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϯ͕ϱϭϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϮϬϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϯ͕ϵϭϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϯϵ Ϭ͘ϬϲϴϬ ϵ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϯϯ͘ϯϬ ϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯ ĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿ ϭϬϱ ϯ͕ϰϵϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭ͕ϯϲϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϳϲ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϵϵ ϳϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϳϴ͕ϴϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϴϴ Ϭ͘ϭϮϮϬ Ϯϱϲ͕ϭϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϱϲϮ Ϭ͘ϯϵϲϰ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ϳϰϵ ϭϯϱϲ͘ϭϱ ĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϰϮ͕ϯϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϰ Ϭ͘ϮϮϬϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϲϮ͕ϳϴϲ Ϭ͘ϰϲϮϴ Ϭ͘ϳϭϲϬ ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲ EŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵƐϮ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϮŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d ^ t E Zd/KEZd ^;zdKd>EhD ZKKD^Ϳ dd,D EdηϮ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ h WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ WĞƌƐŽŶƐ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ 'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ Ϯ͘ϲϳ ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϲϳ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϮϴϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵϭϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϯͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϱ͘ϯϯ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϱ͘ϯϯ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϱϲϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϴϮϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϴ ϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϲϯ͘ϲϳ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϳϵ͘ϱϴ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϴ͕ϯϱϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϴϰ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϳ͕ϭϱϴ Ϭ͘ϬϮϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϰϮϬ Ϯͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϭϮϳ͘ϯϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱϵ͘ϭϳ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϲ͕ϳϭϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϰ͕ϯϭϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϴϰϬ ϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϱϬ͘ϲϳ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϰ͘ϬϬ ϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϭ͕ϵϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϴϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϴ͕ϵϬϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϴϵ Ϭ͘ϬϲϬϮ Ϯͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϭϬϭ͘ϯϯ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϮϮϴ͘ϬϬ ϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ Ϯϯ͕ϵϰϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϯϵ Ϭ͘ϬϯϳϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϳ͕ϴϬϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϳϴ Ϭ͘ϭϮϬϰ ϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϭϯ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϰϮ͘ϵϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϰ͕ϱϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϰ͕ϲϰϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϮϮϳ Ϯͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ Ϯϲ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϴϱ͘ϴϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϵ͕ϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵ͕Ϯϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϮϵϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϱϯ ϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϯ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϭϭ͘ϭϬ ϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯ ĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿ ϭϬϱ ϭ͕ϭϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϳϴϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϵ Ϯͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϲ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϮϮ͘ϮϬ ϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯ ĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿ ϭϬϱ Ϯ͕ϯϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳ͕ϱϳϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϳ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ϯϵϵ͘ϬϬ ϳϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϳϴ͕ϴϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϴϴ Ϭ͘ϭϮϮϬ Ϯϱϲ͕ϭϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϱϲϮ Ϭ͘ϯϵϲϰ ϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ ϭϯϯ͘ϬϬ ϮϱϬ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϲ͕Ϯϳϲ Ϭ͘ϬϮϲϯ Ϭ͘ϬϰϬϳ ϴϱ͕ϯϵϴ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϱϰ Ϭ͘ϭϯϮϭ Ϯͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ Ϯϲϲ͘ϬϬ ϱϬϬ͘ϱϬ ϱϮ͕ϱϱϯ Ϭ͘ϬϱϮϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϭϯ ϭϳϬ͕ϳϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϳϬϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϲϰϯ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ϯϵϵ͘ϬϬ ϳϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϳϴ͕ϴϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϴϴ Ϭ͘ϭϮϮϬ Ϯϱϲ͕ϭϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϱϲϮ Ϭ͘ϯϵϲϰ ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJнsŝƐƚĂ ϰϴϯ͘ϬϬ ϴϱϱ͘ϲϱ ϴϵ͕ϴϰϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϵϴ Ϭ͘ϭϯϵϬ Ϯϵϭ͕ϵϵϭ Ϭ͘ϮϵϮϬ Ϭ͘ϰϱϭϴ ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ Ϯϲϲ͘ϬϬ ϱϬϬ͘ϱϬ ϱϮ͕ϱϱϯ Ϭ͘ϬϱϮϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϭϯ ϭϳϬ͕ϳϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϳϬϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϲϰϯ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂdŽƚĂů ϳϰϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϯϱϲ͘ϭϱ ϭϰϮ͕ϯϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϰ Ϭ͘ϮϮϬϯ ϰϲϮ͕ϳϴϲ Ϭ͘ϰϲϮϴ Ϭ͘ϳϭϲϬ ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲ EŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵƐϮ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϯŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d ^ t E Zd/KEZd ^;zdKd>EhD ZKKD^Ϳ dd,D EdηϮ WůĂƚŝŶƵŵsŝƐƚĂ ηhŶŝƚƐ dŽƚĂůηĞĚƌŽŽŵ WĞƌƐŽŶƐͬĞĚͲ ƌŽŽŵhŶŝƚ WĞƌƐŽŶƐ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϯϬ͘ϬϬ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϱϯ ϭϱϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϵϭ͘Ϯϱ ϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϱϵ ϯϭϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱϳ͘ϳϱ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϴ Ϯϰ ϯ͘ϯϬ Ϯϲ͘ϰϬ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϯϱϬ ϱϮϱ ϲϬϱ͘ϰϬ WůĂƚŝŶƵŵ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϴ ϴ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϴ͘ϬϬ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϵϭ ϭϵϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϴ͘ϳϱ ϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϱϮ ϯϬϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϰϮ͘ϬϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϯϵ ϭϭϳ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϭϮϴ͘ϳϬ ϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿ ϵ ϯϲ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϯϯ͘ϯϬ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϯϵϵ ϲϱϲ ϳϱϬ͘ϳϱ dŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϳϰϵ ϭϭϴϭ ϭ͕ϯϱϲ͘ϭϱ dŚĞƐĞηŽĨƵŶŝƚƐĂŶĚƚŽƚĂůďĞĚƌŽŽŵĐŽƵŶƚĐŽŵĞƐĨƌŽŵƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐKƌĂŶŐĞĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƉůĂŶƐƚŝƚůĞƐŚĞĞƚƐĨŽƌďŽƚŚWůĂƚŝŶƵŵ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ dŚĞhͬĞĚƌŽŽŵhŶŝƚ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐĐŽŵĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϯƚĂďůĞ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵƐϮ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϰŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---     dd,D Edϯ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d ^ t E Zd/KEZd Zd/ >>/E'hE/d^Ϳ dd,D Edηϯ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞĂ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y DĂƌƐŚĂůů;sŝƐƚĂͿ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ϯϮϳ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϭϯ͕ϯϬϲ Ϭ͘ϭϭϯϯ Ϭ͘ϭϳϱϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϲϴ͕Ϯϰϯ Ϭ͘ϯϲϴϮ Ϭ͘ϱϲϵϴ ϵ͕ϱϬϬ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ϭ͕ϵϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϲ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϭϭϱ͕ϮϬϲ Ϭ͘ϭϭϱϮ Ϭ͘ϭϳϴϮ ϯϳϰ͕ϰϭϴ Ϭ͘ϯϳϰϰ Ϭ͘ϱϳϵϯ <ͬ>;'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͿ ϯϮϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϭϬ͕ϴϴϬ Ϭ͘ϭϭϬϵ Ϭ͘ϭϳϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϲϬ͕ϯϲϬ Ϭ͘ϯϲϬϰ Ϭ͘ϱϱϳϲ ϮϬϵ͕ϰϭϵ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ KĨĨŝĐĞͬZĞƐƚ͘ ϰϭ͕ϴϴϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϭϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϰϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯϲ͕ϭϮϮ Ϭ͘ϭϯϲϭ Ϭ͘ϮϭϬϲ ZŽŽŵƐ ϭϯϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϰ͕ϲϬϰ ƐĨ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ͍ ,ŽƚĞů;ĞĚƌŽŽŵƐͿ ϭϱϬ ϰϲ͕ϱϳϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϳϮϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱϭ͕ϯϲϵ Ϭ͘ϭϱϭϰ Ϭ͘ϮϯϰϮ ƐĨŽĨĨůŽŽƌƐƉĂĐĞ ϭϲ͕ϲϴϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϰ͕ϲϬϰ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ͍ ,ŽƚĞů;KĨĨͬZĞƚĂŝůͬZĞƐƚ͘Ϳ ϯ͕ϯϯϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕ϴϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϴ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϴ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϮϬϮ͕ϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϯϭϯϲ ϲϱϴ͕ϲϵϲ Ϭ͘ϲϱϴϳ ϭ͘ϬϭϵϮ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴнϮϴ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ϲϰϳ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽKŶůLJ ϭϬϱ ϮϮϰ͕ϭϴϲ Ϭ͘ϮϮϰϮ Ϭ͘ϯϰϲϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϮϴ͕ϲϬϯ Ϭ͘ϳϮϴϲ ϭ͘ϭϮϳϯ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴнϮϴ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ϯ͘ϯ ůů ϭϬϱ ϯϭϳ͕ϴϴϭ Ϭ͘ϯϭϳϵ Ϭ͘ϰϵϭϴ ϯ͘ϯ ϭ͕Ϭϯϯ͕ϭϭϰ ϭ͘Ϭϯϯϭ ϭ͘ϱϵϴϱ <ͬ>;'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͿŝǀŝĚĞĚ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϭϬϲ͘ϲϳ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϯϲ͕ϵϲϬ Ϭ͘ϬϯϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϱϳϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϮϬ͕ϭϮϬ Ϭ͘ϭϮϬϭ Ϭ͘ϭϴϱϵ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ Ϯϭϯ͘ϯϯ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϳϯ͕ϵϮϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϯϵ Ϭ͘ϭϭϰϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϮϰϬ͕ϮϰϬ Ϭ͘ϮϰϬϮ Ϭ͘ϯϳϭϳ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϲϵ͕ϴϬϲ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ KĨĨŝĐĞͬZĞƐƚ͘ ϭϬϱ ϭϯ͕ϵϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϭϰϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϱ͕ϯϳϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϱϰ Ϭ͘ϬϳϬϮ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϭϯϵ͕ϲϭϯ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ KĨĨŝĐĞͬZĞƐƚ͘ ϭϬϱ Ϯϳ͕ϵϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϮϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϰϯϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵϬ͕ϳϰϴ Ϭ͘ϬϵϬϳ Ϭ͘ϭϰϬϰ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯ WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϰϲ ϯϰ͕ϴϲϴ ƐĨ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ͍ ,ŽƚĞů;ĞĚƌŽŽŵƐͿ ϭϱϬ ϭϱ͕ϱϮϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϱϱ Ϭ͘ϬϮϰϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϬ͕ϰϱϲ Ϭ͘ϬϱϬϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϴϭ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;Ϯͬϯ WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϵϮ ϲϵ͕ϳϯϲ ƐĨ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ͍ ,ŽƚĞů;ĞĚƌŽŽŵƐͿ ϭϱϬ ϯϭ͕ϬϱϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϰϴϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϬ͕ϵϭϯ Ϭ͘ϭϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϭϱϲϭ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯ WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϱ͕ϱϲϭ͘ϲϳ ϯϰ͕ϴϲϴ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ͍ ,ŽƚĞů;KĨĨͬZĞƚĂŝůͬZĞƐƚ͘Ϳ ϭ͕ϭϭϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϲϭϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϲ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;Ϯͬϯ WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϭϭ͕ϭϮϯ͘ϯϯ ϲϵ͕ϳϯϲ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ͍ ,ŽƚĞů;KĨĨͬZĞƚĂŝůͬZĞƐƚ͘Ϳ Ϯ͕ϮϮϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳ͕ϮϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϭϭϮ 'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϮϬϮ͕ϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϯϭϯϲ ϲϱϴ͕ϲϵϲ Ϭ͘ϲϱϴϳ ϭ͘ϬϭϵϮ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϲϳ͕ϱϱϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϭϬϰϱ Ϯϭϵ͕ϱϲϱ Ϭ͘Ϯϭϵϲ Ϭ͘ϯϯϵϳ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϭϯϱ͕ϭϭϳ Ϭ͘ϭϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϮϬϵϭ ϰϯϵ͕ϭϯϭ Ϭ͘ϰϯϵϭ Ϭ͘ϲϳϵϰ 'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϮϬϮ͕ϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϯϭϯϲ ϲϱϴ͕ϲϵϲ Ϭ͘ϲϱϴϳ ϭ͘ϬϭϵϮ 'ĂƚĞǁĂLJнsŝƐƚĂ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴŽŶůLJ ϭϴϮ͕ϳϲϰ Ϭ͘ϭϴϮϴ Ϭ͘ϮϴϮϴ ϱϵϯ͕ϵϴϯ Ϭ͘ϱϵϰϬ Ϭ͘ϵϭϵϬ 'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴŽŶůLJ ϭϯϱ͕ϭϭϳ Ϭ͘ϭϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϮϬϵϭ ϰϯϵ͕ϭϯϭ Ϭ͘ϰϯϵϭ Ϭ͘ϲϳϵϰ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴнϮϴ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ůů ϯϭϳ͕ϴϴϭ Ϭ͘ϯϭϳϵ Ϭ͘ϰϵϭϴ ϭ͕Ϭϯϯ͕ϭϭϰ ϭ͘Ϭϯϯϭ ϭ͘ϱϵϴϱ ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲ͘ ,ŽǁƚŽĐŽŶǀĞƌƚ,ŽƚĞůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ^&ƚŽηŽĨƌŽŽŵƐĂŶĚĂĨůŽǁƌĂƚĞ͍ƐƐƵŵĞĚ͗ƵƐĞĚĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚƐƚƵĚŝŽсϱϱϬƐĨͬƵŶŝƚΘϮ͘ϮϱƉĞƌĐĂƉŝƚĂͬƵŶŝƚΘϭϱϬŐƉĐĚ EŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůDĂƐŚĂůůΘ<>WƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐΘďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ^&ĨƌŽŵ:ĂĐŬƐŽŶͬĞDĂƌĐŽͬdŝĚƵƐWĞĐŬĞŶƉĂƵŐŚDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵĚĂƚĞĚ͗ϬϯͬϭϯͬϭϮ͕ƉĂŐĞϯΘϱ͘ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰǀĞhDĂƌƐŚĂůůΘ<>WƌŽƉϯ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϱŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK---     dd,D Edϰ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d t ^ t E Zd/KEZd ^&KZDK >>/E'hE/d^Ϳ dd,D Edηϰ WůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚƌĞĂϮϴ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐ;^ŝƚĞηϭͿ ŐƉĐĚͬhŽƌ^& ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ϯϵϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϱ͕ϭϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϭϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϮϬϵϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϯϵ͕ϭϴϴ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϰϯϵϮ Ϭ͘ϲϳϵϱ ϳϴϯϵ ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϲϮϵ͘ϰϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕Ϭϰϱ͘ϳϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϮ ϮϴϮϬ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϮϮϲ͘ϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϯϱ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϭϯϱ͕ϵϵϬ͘ϵϮ Ϭ͘ϭϯϲϬ Ϭ͘ϮϭϬϰ ϰϰϭ͕ϵϳϬ͘ϰϴ Ϭ͘ϰϰϮϬ Ϭ͘ϲϴϯϴ ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵWĂƌŬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐΘ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵůƵďŽŶĚŽƐ;^ŝƚĞηϰͿ ϳϳϭ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ Ϯϲϳ͕ϭϱϭ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϮϲϳϮ Ϭ͘ϰϭϯϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϲϴ͕ϮϰϮ͘ϯϴ Ϭ͘ϴϲϴϮ ϭ͘ϯϰϯϰ WůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ;^ŝƚĞηϳͿ ϯϯϲ ϯ͘ϯ &ůĂƚƐ ϭϬϱ ϭϭϲ͕ϰϮϰ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϰ Ϭ͘ϭϴϬϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϳϴ͕ϯϳϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϯϳϴϰ Ϭ͘ϱϴϱϰ ϭϮϰϴ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϭϬϬ͘Ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϮϱ͘ϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϭϭϲ͕ϱϮϰ͘Ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϱ Ϭ͘ϭϴϬϯ ϯϳϴ͕ϳϬϯ͘ϳϬ Ϭ͘ϯϳϴϳ Ϭ͘ϱϴϱϵ >ĞŶŶĂƌΖƐͲdŽǁŶDĞƚƌŽ;^ŝƚĞηϵͿ Ϯϲϴϭ ϯ͘ϯ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ϭϬϱ ϵϮϴ͕ϵϲϲ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϵϮϵϬ ϭ͘ϰϯϳϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϭϵ͕ϭϰϭ͘ϭϯ ϯ͘Ϭϭϵϭ ϰ͘ϲϳϭϯ ϮϮϵ͕ϴϬϬ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϭϴ͕ϰϱϮ͘ϵϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϴϱ Ϭ͘ϬϮϴϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϵ͕ϵϳϮ͘Ϭϲ Ϭ͘ϬϲϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϵϮϴ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϵϰϳ͕ϰϭϵ͘ϰϰ Ϭ͘ϵϰϳϰ ϭ͘ϰϲϱϵ ϯ͕Ϭϳϵ͕ϭϭϯ͘ϭϴ ϯ͘Ϭϳϵϭ ϰ͘ϳϲϰϭ tƌŝŐŚƚŝƌĐůĞWƌŽƉŽƐĂů;^ŝƚĞηϭϬͿ ϲϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϮϬ͕ϳϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϯϮϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲϳ͕ϱϲϳ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϭϬϰϱ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϭ͕ϰϴϳ͕ϴϳϲ͘Ϭϳ ϭ͘ϰϴϳϵ Ϯ͘ϯϬϮϭ ϰ͕ϴϯϱ͕ϱϵϳ͘Ϯϯ ϰ͘ϴϯϱϲ ϳ͘ϰϴϭϴ /ŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐKƌŝŐŝŶĂůDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞĂĨƌŽŵDĂƌƐŚĂůůΘ<>WƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐ ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ ϭϴϮ͕ϳϲϰ͘ϭϬ Ϭ͘ϭϴϮϴ Ϭ͘ϮϴϮϴ ϱϵϯ͕ϵϴϯ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϱϵϰϬ Ϭ͘ϵϭϵϬ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚdŽƚĂů ϭ͕ϲϳϬ͕ϲϰϬ͘ϭϳ ϭ͘ϲϳϬϲ Ϯ͘ϱϴϰϵ ϱ͕ϰϮϵ͕ϱϴϬ͘ϱϲ ϱ͘ϰϮϵϲ ϴ͘ϰϬϬϴ ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲ EŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ >ŽĨƚƐͬ^ƚƵĚŝŽƐ;ϭWĞƌƐŽŶͬhͿ KŶĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϭ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿ dǁŽĞĚƌŽŽŵ;Ϯ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿ dŚƌĞĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯ͘ϯϬWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿ ŝƚLJŽĨŶĂŚĞŝŵŽŵďŝŶĞĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ͕sŽů͘ϭ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲWƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ,ϮD,/>> ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůͬZĞƚĂŝůͬKĨĨŝĐĞͬ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚ;ϯϱϬϬŐƉĚͬĂĐƌĞŽƌϬ͘ϬϴϬϯŐƉĚͬƐĨͿĂƐĞĚŽŶdĂďůĞϱ͗EŽŶͲZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗWƌĞǀŝŽƵƐĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵ^ƚƵĚŝĞƐhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗƉĂŐĞϴ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJǀĞǁĞůΖŐhŶŝƚƐ;WdDW^^Ϳϰ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϲŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---     dd,D Edϱ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d t ZW>E ^ t E Zd/KEZd ^ &KZKE^dZhd WKZd/KE^K&WZ<s/Z//E͕W>d/EhDdZ/E'> KEKD/E/hD^н^d/hD>K&d^;zdKd>EhD ZKKD^Ϳ dd,D Edηϱ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ EĂŵĞ WůĂŶEĂŵĞ ĞĚͬĂƚŚ EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨhŶŝƚƐ EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ dŽƚĂů EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ WĂƌŬsŝƌŝĚŝĂŶͲϭϱϭϱ ͘<ĂƚĞůůĂǀĞŶƵĞ;ϯϮϬhŶŝƚƐͿ ^ŝƚĞηϰ;,ĂůĨƚŚĞ^ŝƚĞŝƐĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚͿ ϭ ^ƚƵĚŝŽͬϭ ϱϱϴ ϯϮ ϭ ϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϯϯϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕ϵϮϬ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϵ ϭ͘ϭ ^ƚƵĚŝŽͬϭ ϱϴϲ ϴ ϭ ϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϴϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϳϯϬ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϮ ϭ͘Ϯ ^ƚƵĚŝŽͬϭ ϱϵϯ Ϯϰ ϭ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϱϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴ͕ϭϵϬ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϴϮ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϳ Ϯ ϭͬϭ ϲϳϰ ϵϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϳ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϮϯϯϳ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϵϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϬ͕Ϭϵϳ Ϭ͘ϬϰϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϲϮϬ Ϯ͘ϭ ϭͬϭ ϲϳϭ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ Ϯ͘Ϯ ϭͬϭ ϲϳϰ Ϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϲϮ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϱϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯ ϯ ϭͬϭ ϳϱϱ ϴ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϰϭϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϯ ϯ͘ϭ ϭͬϭ ϳϲϬ Ϯϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϯϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϯϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕Ϯϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϱϴ ϰ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϮ ϲϵ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱϱ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϲϯϬϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϯ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϮ͕ϵϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϱϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϴϮϬ ϰ͘ϭ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϰ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϰ͘Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϭϭϰ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱ ϰ͘ϯ ϮͬϮ ϵϳϮ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϰ͘ϰ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϭϱϱ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϰ͘ϱ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϮ ϳ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱ͘ϳϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϲϱϯ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͕ϯϳϱ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϴϯ ϰ͘ϲ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϰ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϱ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϬϴ ϭϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϬ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϰϮϱϮ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯ͕ϴϮϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϮϭϰ ϱ͘Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϬϴ ϲ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϰϭϳ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϲϬϳ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϭ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϮϬ ϱϬϴ͘ϬϬ ϱϯ͕ϯϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϴϮϱ ϭϳϯ͕ϯϱϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϭϳϯϰ Ϭ͘ϮϲϴϮ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰ džŝƐƚΖŐĞǀĞůKWΖƚ^ĞǁĞƌ&ůŽǁϱ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϳŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d t ZW>E ^ t E Zd/KEZd ^ &KZKE^dZhd WKZd/KE^K&WZ<s/Z//E͕W>d/EhDdZ/E'> KEKD/E/hD^н^d/hD>K&d^;zdKd>EhD ZKKD^Ϳ dd,D Edηϱ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ EĂŵĞ WůĂŶEĂŵĞ ĞĚͬĂƚŚ EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨhŶŝƚƐ EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ dŽƚĂů EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ WůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵƐͲϭϯϯϭ ͘<ĂƚĞůůĂǀĞŶƵĞ;ϵϮhŶŝƚƐͿ ^ŝƚĞηϳ ϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϯϴ ϯ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͘ϳϱ ϭϬϱ ϳϬϴ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϯϬϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲ ϯͬϮ ϭ͕ϱϵϵ ϭϬ ϯ͘ϯ ϯϯ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϯϰϲϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭ͕Ϯϲϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϳϰ Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϰϲϭ ϲ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϰϭϳ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϲϬϳ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϭ ϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϭϲϰ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱ ϯͬϮ ϭ͕Ϯϳϯ ϴ ϯ͘ϯ Ϯϲ͘ϰϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϳϳϮ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͕ϬϬϵ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϵ ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϰϯ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϯͬϮ ϭ͕ϱϲϱ ϰ ϯ͘ϯ ϭϯ͘ϮϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϴϲ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϱϬϱ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϬ ϰ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϲϰ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϯͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϰϵ ϰ ϯ͘ϯ ϭϯ͘ϮϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϴϲ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϱϬϱ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϬ ϭ ϭͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϭϮ ϴ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϰϭϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϳϱ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱ ϭ ϭͬϭ ϳϰϰ ϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϮϳ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϮϵ ϭ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ Ϯϯϲ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϲϴ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϮ ϯͬϮ͘ ϭ͕ϮϬϬ Ϯ ϯ͘ϯ ϲ͘ϲϬ ϭϬϱ ϲϵϯ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϮϱϮ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϱ ϭ ϭͬϭ͘ϱ ϴϳϯ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ ϭ> Ϯͬϭ͘ϱ ϭ͕Ϭϲϲ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ &ϭ ϭͬϭ͘ ϳϰϯ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ Ϯͬϭ͘ ϵϭϮ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϯͬϮ͘ ϭ͕ϵϲϮ Ϯ ϯ͘ϯ ϲ͘ϲϬ ϭϬϱ ϲϵϯ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϮϱϮ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϱ :ϭ ϭͬϭ͘ϱ ϭ͕ϭϲϱ ϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϮϳ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϯͬϭ͘ϱ ϭ͕ϮϭϬ Ϯ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϰϳϮ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϱϯϲ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϰ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϵϮ ϮϮϬ͘ϱϬ Ϯϯ͕ϭϱϮ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϯϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϱϴ ϳϱ͕Ϯϰϱ͘ϲϯ Ϭ͘ϬϳϱϮ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϰ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ dLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y WůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵƐ;^ŝƚĞηϳͿ ŐƉĐĚͬhŽƌ^& ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ϭϮϰϴ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϭϬϬ͘Ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϯ͘Ϭ ϮϬϬ͘ϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϯ WůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵƐ;^ŝƚĞηϳͿ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů Ϯϯ͕ϮϱϮ͘ϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϮϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϯϲϬ ϳϱ͕ϰϰϲ͘Ϭϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϱϰ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϳ ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰ džŝƐƚΖŐĞǀĞůKWΖƚ^ĞǁĞƌ&ůŽǁϱ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϴŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d t ZW>E ^ t E Zd/KEZd ^ &KZKE^dZhd WKZd/KE^K&WZ<s/Z//E͕W>d/EhDdZ/E'> KEKD/E/hD^н^d/hD>K&d^;zdKd>EhD ZKKD^Ϳ dd,D Edηϱ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ EĂŵĞ WůĂŶEĂŵĞ ĞĚͬĂƚŚ EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨhŶŝƚƐ EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ dŽƚĂů EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐʹϭϴϬϭ ͘<ĂƚĞůůĂǀĞŶƵĞ;ϯϵϬhŶŝƚƐͿ ^ŝƚĞηϭ ;ŽŶĚŽŵŝŶƵŵƐͿ ϭ ϭͬϭ ϲϱϭ ϯϵ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϰϴ͘ϳϱ ϭϬϱ ϱϭϭϴ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϲ͕ϲϯϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϳ ϭͬϭ ϳϮϲ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ >ŽĨƚͬϭ ϳϮϲ ϱ ϭ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ ϭy ϭͬϭ ϳϬϱ ϭϮ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϱϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͕ϭϭϵ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϵ Ϯ ϭͬϭ ϳϮϴ ϵϲ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϮϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϮϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϵϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϬ͕ϵϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϰϭϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϯϰ ϭͬϭ ϳϴϰ ϭϮ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϱϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͕ϭϭϵ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϵ >ŽĨƚͬϭ ϳϴϰ ϮϮ ϭ ϮϮ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϯϭϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳ͕ϱϬϴ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϲ Ϯ>D ϭͬϭ͘ϱ ϵϴϳ ϴ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϰϭϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϯ ϯ >ŽĨƚͬϭ ϱϱϬ ϰ ϭ ϰ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϰϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϯϲϱ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϭ ϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϲϮ ϯϮ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϮ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϳϱϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϰ͕ϱϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϯϴϬ Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϴϮ ϭϯϮ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵϳ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϯϭϭϴϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϯϭϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϴϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϭ͕ϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϭϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϭϱϲϴ Ϯ>D ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϮϬϵ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϮϬϳ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱ ϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϯϵϵ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱ Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϵϴ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ  Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϵϬ ϲϲϳ͘ϳϱ ϳϬ͕ϭϭϯ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϳϬϭ Ϭ͘ϭϬϴϱ ϮϮϳ͕ϴϲϵ͘ϲϵ Ϭ͘ϮϮϳϵ Ϭ͘ϯϱϮϲ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂ ƉĞƌhŶŝƚ dLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐ;^ŝƚĞηϭͿ ŐƉĐĚͬhŽƌ^& ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ϳϴϯϵ ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϲϮϵ͘ϰϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕Ϭϰϱ͘ϳϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϮ ϮϴϮϬ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϮϮϲ͘ϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϯϱ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϴϱϱ͘ϵϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯ Ϯ͕ϳϴϭ͘ϳϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϯ ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐ;^ŝƚĞηϭͿ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϳϬ͕ϵϲϵ͘ϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϳϭϬ Ϭ͘ϭϬϵϴ ϮϯϬ͕ϲϱϭ͘ϰϮ Ϭ͘ϮϯϬϳ Ϭ͘ϯϱϲϵ dŽƚĂů ϴϬϮ ϭϯϵϲ͘Ϯϱ ϭϰϳ͕ϱϲϮ͘ϯϴ Ϭ͘ϭϰϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϮϴϯ ϰϳϵ͕ϰϱϮ͘ϰϳ Ϭ͘ϰϳϵϱ Ϭ͘ϳϰϭϴ EŽƚĞ͗ >ŽĨƚƐͬ^ƚƵĚŝŽƐ;ϭWĞƌƐŽŶͬhͿ KŶĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϭ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿ dǁŽĞĚƌŽŽŵ;Ϯ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿ dŚƌĞĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯ͘ϯϬWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿ EŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůͬZĞƚĂŝůͬKĨĨŝĐĞͬ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚ;ϯϱϬϬŐƉĚͬĂĐƌĞŽƌϬ͘ϬϴϬϯŐƉĚͬƐĨͿĂƐĞĚŽŶdĂďůĞϱ͗EŽŶͲZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗWƌĞǀŝŽƵƐĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵ^ƚƵĚŝĞƐhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗƉĂŐĞϴ ŝƚLJŽĨŶĂŚĞŝŵŽŵďŝŶĞĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ͕sŽů͘ϭ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲWƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ,ϮD,/>> ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰ džŝƐƚΖŐĞǀĞůKWΖƚ^ĞǁĞƌ&ůŽǁϱ ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭD ϵŽĨϵ ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---     dd,D Edϲ ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---     dd,D Edϳ   ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF ANAHIEM, CA PLATINUM GATEWAY AND PLATINUM VISTA CONCEPTUAL SEWER CONCEPT TO KATELLA AVE. LEGEND: