Document Anaheim_doc_f9689f097b

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan SCH No. 91091062 Prepared for Susan Kim, Senior Planner Planning Department City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Prepared by BonTerra Consulting 2 Executive Circle, Suite 175 Irvine, California 92614 T: (714) 444-9199 F: (714) 444-9599 www.BonTerraConsulting.com December 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section 1.0 Introduction 1-3 1.1 Final Environmental Impact Report Requirements 1-3 1.2 Project Description Summary 1-3 1.3 CEQA Compliance and EIR Review Process 1-4 1.4 Contents Of The Final EIR 1-5 Section 2.0 Responses To Comments 2-1 2.1 Comment Letters Received 2-1 2.2 State 2-3 2.2.1 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) 2-5 2.2.2 California Department of Transportation, District 12 (Caltrans) 2-13 2.2.3 Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) 2-17 2.2.4 Public Utilities Commission (PUC) 2-24 2.3 Local Agencies 2-27 2.3.1 City of Orange (Orange) 2-29 2.3.2 OC Public Works (OCPW) 2-41 2.4 Other Interested Parties 2-45 2.4.1 Seltzer, Caplan, McMahon, Vitek a (SCMVa) 2-47 2.4.2 Seltzer, Caplan, Mcmahon, Vitek b 2-55 Section 3.0 Errata 3-1 3.1 Text Changes to the Draft EIR 3-1 Section 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring Program 4-1 TABLES Table Page 1-1 Existing, Permitted and Proposed Development 1-4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx ii Table of Contents APPENDICES Appendices A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Errata Pages – December 2012 B Water Demand Memorandum – July 2011 C Revised Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Errata Pages – December 2012 D The Anaheim Resort Identity Program Errata Pages – December 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 1-3 Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIREMENTS Before approving a Project, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the Lead Agency to prepare and certify a Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR). This document, combined with the referenced documents below, represent the Final EIR for the Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project (Project). This Final EIR has been prepared in accordance with Section 15132 of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended. As required by this section, the Final EIR shall consist of the following: • The Draft SEIR (SCH No. 91091062) or a revision of the Draft SEIR. • Comments and recommendations received on the Draft SEIR, • A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft SEIR. • The Lead Agency’s responses to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. • Any other information added by the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency must provide each agency that commented on the Draft SEIR with a copy of the Lead Agency’s proposed response at least ten days before certifying the Final SEIR. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY The Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project (Project) involves the build out of the ARSP, as defined in DRAFT SEIR No. 313 and subsequent amendments and adjustments to date and the expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) area encompasses 581.3 gross acres and is located in the City of Anaheim, 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 7 miles northwest of Santa Ana, in Central Orange County. The ARSP area is located generally west of the Interstate 5 corridor, south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Street, and north of Chapman Avenue. The Convention Center is located within the ARSP area, south of Katella Avenue between West Street and Hotel Way. Development in Accordance with the ARSP The ARSP area is divided into two Development Areas: Area 1 and Area 2. Development Area 1 is also known as the Commercial-Recreation (C-R) District and encompasses approximately 518.5 acres. Development Area 2 is also known as the Public Recreational (PR) District and encompassed 62.8 acres. Existing, permitted, and proposed development in these two areas is shown in Table 1-1. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 1-4 Table of Contents TABLE 1-1 EXISTING, PERMITTED AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT District Existing Development Permitted Development Proposed Development C-R District • 11,587 hotel rooms* • 32,500 hotel rooms • 32,500 hotel rooms P-R District • 1,600 hotel rooms • 1,712,004 sf convention center • 1,600 hotel rooms • 1,712,004 sf convention center • 119,414 sf future traffic generating uses • 100,000 sf outdoor programmable space • 2,500 hotel rooms • 2,118,363 sf convention center • 180,000 sf commercial development • 40,000 sf of additional hotel meeting and ballroom space • 100,000 sf outdoor programmable space * Commercial uses are converted to hotel room equivalents on a ratio of 600 square feet of commercial development = 1 hotel room The ARSP permits up to 32,500 hotel rooms within the C-R District. There are 11,587 hotel rooms or hotel room equivalents1 that are currently developed within the ARSP area. For impact analysis, commercial uses are converted to hotel room equivalents on a ratio of 600 square feet of commercial development to one hotel room. The Proposed Project does not include any changes to allowable number of hotel rooms in the C-R District. The PR District includes the 1,712,004 square foot (sf) Anaheim Convention Center (Convention Center) and the 1,600-room Anaheim Hilton Hotel. In addition, 219,414 sf of future traffic-generating development was environmentally cleared within the PR District through the certification of the MEIR. Of this development potential, 100,000 sf has been allocated toward outdoor programmable space for the Anaheim Convention Center Grand Plaza Project. The Proposed Project includes a further expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center, with the following components: • An additional 406,359 sf of Convention Center space (including exhibit halls, ballrooms, flexible meeting space, office and meeting rooms, and an interior bridge/skyway) and • 180,000 sf of commercial space (including, but not limited to, retail stores, spa facilities, bars and and restaurants). • A maximum of 900 hotel additional rooms, • A maximum of 40,000 sf of additional hotel meeting and ballroom space, and 1.3 CEQA COMPLIANCE AND EIR REVIEW PROCESS In compliance with Section 15087 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim circulated copies of the Notice of Availability of a Draft SEIR to the State Clearinghouse (as well as a Notice of Completion), responsible and trustee agencies, local agencies, and any other interested parties for a 45-day public review period. The Draft EIR was made available for public review at City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA; 1 A hotel room equivalent is a defined area of a specific land use type that has been determined to result in environmental effects (such as traffic generation) that are roughly equivalent to a single hotel room. The use of hotel room equivalents allow for the development of other allowed land uses in an area that the maximum allowable density is defined in terms of hotel rooms. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 1-5 Table of Contents and online at www.anaheim.net/planning. The Draft EIR public review period began on Friday September 14, 2012, and ended on Monday, October 29, 2012. 1.4 CONTENTS OF THE FINAL EIR This document—together with the Draft SEIR dated September 14, 2012 for the proposed Project and the Technical Appendices to the Draft SEIR dated September 14, 2012—constitutes the “Final SEIR” for the proposed Project. The Draft SEIR consists of the Draft SEIR, which includes the environmental analysis for the proposed Project and Technical Appendices A through J. This Final SEIR is organized in the following five sections: • Section 1.0 (Introduction): This section provides a brief introduction to the Final SEIR and its contents. • Section 2.0 (Responses to Comments): This section provides each written comment letter submitted by both public agencies and interested parties, followed by responses to the comments. • Section 3.0 (Errata): This section consists of text changes made to the Draft SEIR as a result of comments raised during the public review process, as well as minor typographical corrections. Changes within the Errata would not result in significant new information that could require recirculation of the Draft SEIR, pursuant to Section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. • Section 4.0 (Mitigation Monitoring Program): This section includes the Mitigation Monitoring Program, which identifies the mitigation measures, monitoring timing, action required, responsible agency/party, and the monitoring agency/party responsible for ensuring each recommended mitigation measure is implemented. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 1-6 Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-1 Responses to Comments SECTION 2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS 2.1 COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED The Draft SEIR public review period for the Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project began on Tuesday, September 14, 2012, and ended on Monday, October 29, 2012. During the public review period, the City of Anaheim received a total of eight comment letters from State and local agencies and a local business on the Draft SEIR. Consistent with Section 15088 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City’s Responses to Comments are provided below. Each comment letter is identified by the abbreviation of the agency or organization name, as noted in parentheses next to the list of written commenters below, and each comment in each letter is individually numbered beginning with For example, the comment letter from the Native American Heritage Commission is identified as letter “NAHC” and the individual comments in this letter are identified as NAHC-1, NAHC-2, etc. Responses to these written comments are identified using the same convention; hence, the response to the first comment of this letter is identified as “Response NAHC-1”. Comment letters received are categorized as state agencies, local agencies, or organizations. Within each category, the comment letters are organized in alphabetical order. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-2 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-3 Responses to Comments 2.2 STATE AGENCIES ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-4 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-5 Responses to Comments 2.2.1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL (DTSC) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-6 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-7 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-8 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-9 Responses to Comments 2.2.1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL (DTSC) October 19, 2012 Response DTSC-1 The Draft EIR analysis is based on the EDR Radius Map with Geocheck®, ARSP South and the EDR Radius Map with Geocheck®, ARSP North, both dated May 2010 and prepared by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) and collectively referred to as EDR Reports (provided in Appendix F of the Draft SEIR). These reports were prepared to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05). The EDR Reports document the State and federal databases that were reviewed to determine if the Project site or any adjacent properties were listed as hazardous waste generators, as having underground storage tank releases (UST), or as having other environmental concerns. The EDR Reports provides a listing of all federal, State, regional, and tribal databases searched. The databases listed in Comment DTSC-1 were referenced in the EDR Reports. As discussed on pages 5.7-6 and 5.7-7 of the Draft SEIR, multiple sites containing leaking underground storage tanks were identified where the status of the leak was not reported. Therefore, the Draft SEIR identified appropriate mitigation measures (refer to MMs 5.7-1 through 5.7-7 of the Draft SEIR) required to address this impact and reduce it to a less than significant level. Response DTSC-2 Please refer to Response DTSC-1, above. Response DTSC-3 As stated on page 5.7-6 of the Draft SEIR, four sites within the C-R District have been reported as containing leaking underground storage tanks which do not have record of remediation or evidence of case closure. As individual, future development projects are proposed within the C-R District area of the ARSP, property owners/developers shall be responsible for ensuring that any necessary remediation activities have been completed. MM 5.7-5 of the Draft SEIR requires further analysis, as appropriate, such as subsurface investigation and sampling to determine what, if any, additional remediation measures are necessary. Further MM 5.7-5 identifies that any subsequent analyses be subject to review and approval by the City of Anaheim Fire Department, which has jurisdiction to oversee hazardous substance cleanup. Response DTSC-4 As stated on page 5.7-7, the ARSP area contains structures constructed prior to 1972; therefore, these structures have the potential to contain asbestos. Further, the ARSP area contains structures constructed prior to 1992 which have the potential to contain lead-based paint. SRs 5.7-1 and 5.7-2 and MM 5.7-6 requires that all construction activities, including demolition and renovation of existing facilities and installation of new facilities, be performed in compliance with all California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CalOSHA) has regulations and that the removal and disposal of LBP be performed by a California licensed and registered LBP Abatement Contractor. Additionally, MM 5.7-6 requires that hazardous waste, including asbestos, be handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-10 Responses to Comments Therefore, with implementation of MM 5.7-6 and compliance with State requirements for asbestos and lead (if present) abatement (SRs 5.7-1 and 5.7-2), there would be less than significant impacts related to exposure to these materials during buildout of the ARSP. Response DTSC-5 Consistent with MMs 5.7-1 and 5.7-7 of the Draft SEIR, in areas where hazardous materials are known or suspected, a qualified environmental professional shall conduct an investigation which may include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a subsurface investigation, including soil sampling or a soil organic vapor survey, prior to earth disturbance. Should the soil be found to be contaminated, the project would comply with applicable regulations related to the storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous waste such as Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. Further, any potential exposure to or disposal of hazardous materials would be in conformance with all CalOSHA standards (refer to SR 5.7-1 of the Draft SEIR), California Code of Regulations Title 17 (refer to SR 5.7-2), and the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (refer to SR 5.7-3) as well as all other applicable regulations, including the California Accidental Release Prevention Program and the California Emergency Response Plan. Response DTSC-6 According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) 2003 publication The Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, health risk assessments, which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions, should be based on a 70-year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with a proposed Project. Construction-related emissions of TACs would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial emissions of TACs because the use of off-road, heavy-duty equipment would be temporary (short in duration when compared to 70 years); diesel PM has highly dispersive properties; and exhaust emissions would further be reduced with improved equipment. As stated in the Initial Study Checklist prepared for the project and included as Appendix B to the Draft SEIR, daily operations with the ARSP area are not anticipated to include uses that would emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste. Therefore, a quantitative assessment of TAC health risks is not required. Response DTSC-7 Refer to Response DTSC-5 Response DTSC-8 As stated in the Initial Study Checklist prepared for the project and included as Appendix B to the Draft SEIR, the project is not anticipated to include uses that would emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste. However, should any unforeseen hazardous wastes be generated, these would be managed in accordance with applicable State law and regulations. No revisions to the analysis or conclusions set forth in the Draft EIR are required. Response DTSC-9 As noted in MM 5.7-3 of the Draft SEIR, should any non-UST-related remediation activities occur, all remediation activities shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Care Agency (COHCA). Further, the Anaheim Fire Department shall be responsible for review and approval ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-11 Responses to Comments of plans related to remediation of previously unknown USTs, LUSTs, and other hazardous materials (refer to MMs 5.7-4 and 5.7-5 of the Draft SEIR). The contact name provided in Comment DTSC-9 is noted. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-12 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-13 Responses to Comments 2.2.2 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT 12 (CALTRANS) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-14 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-15 Responses to Comments 2.2.2 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT 12 (CALTRANS) October 29, 2012 Response Caltrans-1 The Traffic Mitigation Agreement (TMA) referred to in the comment letter is an agreement currently being developed between Caltrans and the City of Anaheim to fund improvements which would mitigate impacts identified in the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. However, it should be noted that the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, which is addressed in Draft SEIR 340, is not related to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. These projects may occur independently of each other, and do not depend upon each other or each other’s improvements in order to be fully implemented. Proposed development within the ARSP area can be built without any development in the Platinum Triangle, as has been the case for over 20 years. Similarly, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan can be fully developed without any additional development or improvements within the ARSP area. The two projects are mutually exclusive; therefore, the TMA referred to in the comment letter does not apply to the project evaluated in Draft SEIR 340. Response Caltrans-2 The study area was developed using the "Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies" and includes all locations meeting the minimum criterion for analysis. It should also be noted that cumulative impacts do not exist on SR-57. As shown in Appendix H of the Traffic Study (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR), the project would result in nominal changes to traffic volumes on the SR-57 freeway. Response Caltrans-3 As stated previously in the Response Caltrans-2, the study area was developed using the "Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies" and includes all locations meeting the minimum criterion for analysis. Of the four locations specified in this comment, only the intersection at Orangewood Avenue/SR-57 Southbound ramps is projected to be deficient, and the mitigation measure is identified in the DSEIR. Response Caltrans-4 As stated in Section 2.4.1 of the Draft SEIR, the City of Anaheim held one scoping meeting on February 25, 2009 to provide the public, including any interested or affected agencies, with a forum to identify any additional environmental issues to be evaluated in the Draft SEIR. All potential issues raised at this scoping meeting or during the public comment period for the NOP/IS are identified and addressed in the Draft SEIR, as stated in Section 2.4.1 of the Draft SEIR. Response Caltrans-5 As stated on pages 8-10 of the TIA (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR), and consistent with the approach taken for the recent Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (EIR 339), the analysis was performed by application of the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM) to develop future traffic forecast volumes throughout The Anaheim Resort and surrounding study area. ATAM is the traffic forecasting modeling tool for the City of Anaheim and has been certified by the Orange County Transportation Authority as consistent with the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM). ATAM relies on OCTAM for the regional component ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-16 Responses to Comments of traffic activity and OCTAM is based on and is consistent with the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) regional transportation model, and therefore, incorporates adopted regional growth projections. In order to identify trips generated for use in the City of Anaheim’s model ATAM, an employment conversion rate is utilized for office and retail land uses. The rate is based on regional demographic information and converts land use quantities to number of employees. The total trip generation or number of trips is then calculated based on the trip purpose for each employee. Residential based trips are calculated based on the trip purpose for each dwelling unit. There are no trip rates based on land use. Therefore, trips are generated based on socioeconomic data and not by land use. Response Caltrans-6 The map in Appendix H of the Traffic Study (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR) shows the project trips. Based on the socioeconomic growth projections developed for ATAM trip generation, future trip activity is estimated and assigned to the roadway circulation system in ATAM using an equilibrium assignment. It is not based on any land use type, but rather socioeconomic data which is consistent with OCTA and SCAG forecasting requirements. Response Caltrans-7 Per the commenter’s request, the City of Anaheim will forward the complete electronic Analysis files to Caltrans District 12 Traffic Operations for review. Response Caltrans-8 The SEIR and associated Traffic Study (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR) have sufficiently addressed all impacts per State guidelines. The City of Anaheim is willing to work towards an agreement with Caltrans to mitigate the impacts identified in the SEIR. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-17 Responses to Comments 2.2.3 NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION (NAHC) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-18 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-19 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-20 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-21 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-22 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-23 Responses to Comments 2.2.3 NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION (NAHC) October 5, 2012 Response NAHC-1 As stated on page 5.4-7 of the Draft SEIR, an inquiry was made of the NAHC for this Project on October 21, 2009, requesting a review of the Sacred Lands File database regarding the possibility of Native American cultural resources and/or sacred places in the Project vicinity that are not documented on other databases. The NAHC Search of the Sacred Lands File did not identify the presence of Native American cultural resources on the Project site. The NAHC did provide a list of Native American groups and individuals who may have knowledge of Native American cultural resources not formally listed on any database, which are listed below: • Sonia Johnston, Tribal Chairperson, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians; • David Belardes, Chairperson, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation; • Joyce Perry, Representing the Tribal Chairperson, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation; • Anthony Rivera, Chairman, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation; • Anthony Morales, Chairperson, Gabrielino/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians; • Sam Dunlap, Tribal Secretary, Gabrielino Tongva Nation; and • Linda Candelaria, Chairwoman, Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe. Each of these groups and individuals were mailed an informational letter on November 2, 2009, describing the Project and requesting any information regarding resources that may exist on or near the Project site. No responses were received. Although no response letters were received for the project, the City has included three mitigation measures to address potential impacts related to the discovery of cultural resources and human remains during Project implementation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-24 Responses to Comments 2.2.4 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (PUC) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-25 Responses to Comments 2.2.4 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (PUC) October 12, 2012 Response PUC-1 The nearest rail corridor is located outside of the ARSP area and east of the I-5 Freeway. Therefore, any future development associated with the ARSP would not conflict with railroad right-of-way. No revisions to the document are required. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-26 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-27 Responses to Comments 2.3 LOCAL AGENCIES ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-28 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-29 Responses to Comments 2.3.1 CITY OF ORANGE (ORANGE) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-30 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-31 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-32 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-33 Responses to Comments 2.3.1 CITY OF ORANGE (ORANGE) October 29, 2012 Response Orange-1 The text in Section 5.14, Transportation and Traffic, shall be modified as follows, in accordance with the revisions to the Traffic Impact Analysis, included as Appendix A of this Final SEIR: Page 5.14-4, last paragraph Peak hour analyses were performed for 81 study intersections, including 64 intersections in the City of Anaheim, 2 shared intersections between the cities of Anaheim and Orange, and 159 intersections in the City of Orange. Page 5.14-8 through 5.14-10, Table 5.14-6 TABLE 5.14-6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-1** Euclid St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.89 D 1.02 F I-2 Ninth St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.53 A I-3 Walnut St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.57 A 0.55 A I-4 Walnut St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.43 A 0.53 A I-5 Disneyland Dr/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.68 B 0.76 C I-6 Disneyland Dr/West St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.57 A I-7 Harbor Blvd/Vermont Ave Anaheim 0.56 A 0.58 A I-8 Harbor Blvd/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.73 C 0.68 B I-9 Harbor Blvd/I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.54 A 0.54 A I-10 Harbor Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.32 A 0.34 A I-11 Harbor Blvd/Disney Way Anaheim 0.33 A 0.42 A I-12 Harbor Blvd/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.55 A 0.63 B I-13 Harbor Blvd/Convention Way Anaheim 0.29 A 0.35 A I-14 Harbor Blvd/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.55 A 0.57 A I-15 Clementine St/Disney Way Anaheim 0.19 A 0.23 A I-16 Clementine St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.60 A I-17 I-5 Southbound Off Ramp/Disney Way Anaheim* 0.20 A 0.24 A I-18 Anaheim Blvd/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.63 B 0.91 E I-19 Anaheim Blvd/Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.49 A 0.71 C I-20 Anaheim Blvd/I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.44 A 0.59 A I-21 Anaheim Blvd/Disney Way Anaheim* 0.44 A 0.49 A I-22 Anaheim Blvd/Haster St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.47 A 0.58 A I-23 Haster St/Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-24 Haster St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.54 A 0.65 B I-25 Manchester Ave (I-5 Southbound Ramps)/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.55 A 0.52 A I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.46 A 0.50 A I-27 East St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.51 A 0.67 B ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-34 Responses to Comments TABLE 5.14-6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-28 Lewis St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.41 A 0.53 A I-29 Lewis St/Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.28 A 0.31 A I-30 Lewis St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.48 A 0.62 B I-31 Lewis St/Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-32 I-5 HOV Ramps/Gene Autry Way Anaheim* 0.07 A 0.07 A I-33 Lewis St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.48 A I-34 Manchester Ave/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.52 A 0.37 A I-35 Anaheim Way/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.36 A 0.50 A I-36 State College Blvd/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.57 A 0.65 B I-37 State College Blvd/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.43 A 0.53 A I-38 State College Blvd/Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.30 A 0.29 A I-39 State College Blvd/Orangewood Ave Anaheim/Orange 0.46 A 0.47 A I-40 State College Blvd/Orange Center Dr Anaheim/Orange 0.21 A 0.21 A I-41 State College Blvd/I-5 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.33 A 0.28 A I-42 State College Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.43 A 0.28 A I-43 State College Blvd/The City Dr/ Chapman Ave Orange 0.71 C 0.66 B I-44 Sunkist St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.82 D 0.79 C I-45 Howell Ave/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.38 A 0.55 A I-46 Rampart St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.51 A 0.44 A I-47 Rampart St/Chapman Ave Orange 0.31 A 0.31 A I-48 Ball Rd/SR-57 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.54 A 0.58 A I-49 Ball Rd/SR-57 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.69 B 0.57 A I-50 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.36 A 0.40 A I-51 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.40 A 0.40 A I-52 Orangewood Ave/SR-57 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.52 A 0.49 A I-53 Orangewood Ave/SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.61 B 0.68 B I-54 Phoenix Club Dr/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.48 A 0.59 A I-55 Douglass Rd/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.41 A 0.49 A I-56 Eckhoff St/Orangewood Ave Orange 0.56 A 0.69 B I-57 Main St/Taft Ave Orange 0.68 B 0.73 C I-58 Main St/Katella Ave Orange 0.50 A 0.50 A I-59 Batavia St/Taft Ave Orange 0.65 B 0.67 B I-60 Clementine St/Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-61 Clementine St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.33 A 0.33 A I-62 Flower St/Chapman Ave Orange 0.38 A 0.49 A I-63 Harbor Blvd/Chapman Ave Anaheim 0.55 A 0.61 B I-64 I-5 Ramps/Chapman Ave Orange* 0.43 A 0.46 A I-65 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/ Chapman Ave Orange* 0.40 A 0.39 A I-66 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/ Chapman Ave Orange* 0.54 A 0.52 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-35 Responses to Comments TABLE 5.14-6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-67 Euclid St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.59 A 0.66 B I-68 Walnut St/Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.56 A 0.47 A I-69 Disneyland Dr/I-5 Southbound Off Ramp Anaheim* 0.35 A 0.29 A I-70 Disneyland Dr/Magic Way Anaheim 0.28 A 0.30 A I-71 Ox Rd/Cast Place/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.56 A 0.55 A I-72 Convention Center/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.39 A 0.41 A I-73 Harbor Blvd/Lincoln Ave Anaheim 0.61 B 0.76 C I-74 Harbor Blvd/Broadway Anaheim 0.50 A 0.67 B I-75 Harbor Blvd/Manchester Ave Anaheim 0.29 A 0.43 A I-76 Anaheim Blvd/Lincoln Ave Anaheim 0.47 A 0.60 A I-77 Anaheim Blvd/Broadway Anaheim 0.46 A 0.52 A I-78 Olive St/Lincoln Ave Anaheim 0.40 A 0.43 A I-79 Flore St/West St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.53 A 0.47 A I-80 West St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.61 B 0.72 C I-81 Struck Ave/Katella Ave Orange 0.28 A 0.34 A Note: * Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction* The intersection of Euclid St/Katella Ave is currently under construction to enhance capacity. The intersection of Euclid Street/Katella Avenue is currently under construction to enhance capacity. Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010. Page 5.14-44 through 5.14-46, Table 5.14-25 TABLE 5.14-25 RECOMMENDED 2030 INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project Scenario Without Mitigation 2030 With Project Scenario With Mitigation Recommended Mitigation Strategy AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I-1 Euclid St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.87 D 0.94 E 0.87 D 0.89 D Restripe NBR to NBTR, add 400’ NB departure lane (widen) I-2 Ninth St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.95 E 0.97 E 0.88 D 0.80 C Add 2nd NBL (Restripe #1 SB lane) I-5 Disneyland Dr/ Ball Rd Anaheim 0.87 D 0.92 E 0.83 D 0.87 D Add NBL, Restripe NB to 2L, 2T, 1R and SB to 2L, 2T. Remove Split Phase I-6 Disneyland Dr/ West St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.96 E 0.94 E 0.85 D 0.90 D Restripe EBR to EBT, Restripe WBR to WBT and add 4th WB lane to the Simba parking lot entrance I-8 Harbor Blvd/ Ball Rd Anaheim 1.10 F 0.96 E 0.90 D 0.90 D Add NBT, SBT, EBT, EBR ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-36 Responses to Comments TABLE 5.14-25 RECOMMENDED 2030 INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project Scenario Without Mitigation 2030 With Project Scenario With Mitigation Recommended Mitigation Strategy AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I-18 Anaheim Blvd/ Ball Rd Anaheim 0.88 D 1.01 F 0.82 D 0.90 D Add NBR, EBL, EBR I-19 Anaheim Blvd/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.86 D 1.03 F 0.68 B 0.86 D Add NBL, SBL, WBR, Restripe WB approach to 2L, 1TR, 1R I-20 Anaheim Blvd/ I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.66 B 0.95 E 0.55 A 0.85 D Add SBT ( in median) I-22 Anaheim Blvd/ Haster St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.90 D 0.92 E 0.90 D 0.90 D Add WBR I-23 Haster St/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.97 E 1.17 F 0.78 C 0.88 D Add WBL, SBL, SBR I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/ Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.95 E 0.90 D 0.82 D 0.78 C Add EBT, WBT I-29 Lewis St/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.85 D 0.95 E 0.85 D 0.89 D Add WBR I-30 Lewis St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.85 D 1.28 F 0.70 B 0.83 D Add NBL, NBT, SBL, SBR, WBT; Restripe SB to 2L, 1T, 1TR, 1R I-37 State College Blvd/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.94 E 0.99 E 0.90 D 0.85 D Add WBR, EBR; Restripe SB to 2L, 2T, 2R; EB to 3L, 3T, 1R I-38 State College Blvd/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim 1.02 F 0.84 D 0.90 D 0.73 C Add SBR I-39 State College Blvd/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim/ Orange 0.91 E 0.97 E 0.88 D 0.90 D Add NBR and WBT I-43 State College Blvd/ The City Dr/ Chapman Ave Orange 0.88 D 0.96 E 0.83 D 0.80 C Restripe WBT to WBTR I-45 Howell Ave/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.62 B 0.95 E 0.62 B 0.85 D Add WBR I-46 Rampart St/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.78 C 1.13 F 0.73 C 0.80 C Add NB Free Right, Add SBL ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-37 Responses to Comments TABLE 5.14-25 RECOMMENDED 2030 INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project Scenario Without Mitigation 2030 With Project Scenario With Mitigation Recommended Mitigation Strategy AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I-53 Orangewood Ave/ SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.84 D 1.04 F 0.79 C 0.89 D Add WBL (Restripe) I-55 Douglass Rd/ Katella Ave Anaheim 1.04 F 1.09 F 0.84 D 0.87 D Add NBT and SBT; Reconfigure NBTR to NBT, Reconfigure SBTR to SBT, Add EBT and WBT Note: * Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010. Page 5.14-72 and Page 5.14-73, Table 5.14-34 TABLE 5.14-34 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ID Location Jurisdiction Impact Mitigation Strategy Comments Intersection I-1 Euclid St/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Restripe NBR to NBTR, add 400’ NB departure lane (widen) Override I-2 Ninth St/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add 2nd NBL (Restripe #1 SB lane) I-5 Disneyland Dr/ Ball Rd Anaheim Project Add NBL, Restripe NB to 2L, 2T, 1R and SB to 2L, 2T. Remove Split Phase Override I-6 Disneyland Dr/ West St/ Katella Avea Anaheim Project Restripe EBR to EBT, Restripe WBR to WBT and add 4th WB lane to the Simba parking lot entrance Partial Override I-8 Harbor Blvd/ Ball Rd Anaheim Project Add NBT, SBT, EBT, EBR Override ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-38 Responses to Comments TABLE 5.14-34 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ID Location Jurisdiction Impact Mitigation Strategy Comments I-18 Anaheim Blvd/ Ball Rdb Anaheim Project Add NBR, EBL, EBR I-19 Anaheim Blvd/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim Project Add NBL, SBL, WBR, Restripe WB approach to 2L, 1TR, 1R I-20 Anaheim Blvd/ I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* Project Add SBT ( in median) I-22 Anaheim Blvd/ Haster St/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add WBR Override I-23 Haster St/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim Project Add WBL, SBL, SBR I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/ Katella Ave Anaheim* Project Add EBT, WBT I-29 Lewis St/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim Project Add WBR I-30 Lewis St/ Katella Aveb Anaheim Project Add NBL, NBT, SBL, SBR, WBT; Restripe SB to 2L, 1T, 1TR, 1R I-37 State College Blvd/ Katella Avec Anaheim Project Add WBR, EBR; Restripe SB to 2L, 2T, 2R, EB to 3L, 3T, 1R Partial Override I-38 State College Blvd/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim Project Add SBR I-39 State College Blvd/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim/ Orange Project Add NBR and WBT Override I-43 State College Blvd/ The City Dr/ Chapman Ave Orange Project Restripe WBT to WBTR I-45 Howell Ave/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add WBR I-46 Rampart St/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim Project Add NB Free Right, Add SBL I-53 Orangewood Ave/ SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange Project Add WBL (Restripe) Override I-55 Douglass Rd/ Katella Ave Anaheim* Project Add NBT and SBT, Reconfigure NBTR to NBT, Reconfigure SBTR to SBT, Add EBT and WBT ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-39 Responses to Comments TABLE 5.14-34 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ID Location Jurisdiction Impact Mitigation Strategy Comments Arterial Segments A-35 Katella Ave between Disneyland Dr and Hotel Wayd Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-36 Katella Ave between Hotel Way and Harbor Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-37 Katella Ave between Harbor Blvd and Clementine Std Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-38 Katella Ave between Clementine St and Anaheim Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-39 Katella Ave between Anaheim Blvd and Manchester Aved Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-40a Katella Ave between Manchester Ave and Anaheim Way Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane Stadium Smart St Ramp Termini Intersections I-20 Anaheim Blvd/ I-5 Northbound Rampse Anaheim Project Add 4th SBT I-25 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add 4th EBT, Add 4th WBT I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/ Katella Avee Anaheim Project Add 4th EBT, Add 5th WBT I-53 Orangewood Ave/ SR-57 Southbound Rampse Orange Project Add WBL(restripe) Override a EB improvements are not being overridden b Intersection deficient in 2015 but no project related significant impact. The improvements from 2030 should be expedited to 2015 at these locations for the intersection to operate at an acceptable LOS in 2015 with the exception of the improvement at Katella Ave and Lewis St, which is infeasible in 2015. c Override recommended for restriping one EBT to EBL only d Arterial Segment deficient in 2015 e Intersection identified as deficient under both ICU and HCM analysis. * Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Response Orange-2 Key changes to the highway network for both the Interim 2015 scenario and the 2030 scenario are listed on page 9 of the traffic impact analysis included as Appendix H of the Draft SEIR. All improvements are listed in detail in Appendix B to the traffic impact analysis (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR). The only change to the 2015 network is an improvement to the Euclid Street/Katella Avenue intersection. Response Orange-3 As stated in the Draft SEIR and restated by the commenter, the service degradation at the intersection of Main Street and Taft Avenue is due to the approved projects shown on page 26 of the Traffic Study (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR). Response Orange-4 As stated on page 37 of the Traffic Study (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR), the 2015 With Project Scenario incorporates the expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center only. With ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-40 Responses to Comments implementation of the proposed project, traffic increases are forecasted to be concentrated on Katella Avenue and some increase along Orangewood Avenue to I-5 only. The 2030 scenario represents full buildout of the ARSP area, with increased development intensity between Vermont Avenue and Chapman Avenue. As a result of this increase in intensity, traffic volumes will change on all streets in the vicinity of the project. Response Orange-5 The City of Anaheim met with the City of Orange regarding the proposed project at the time the NOP was released for public review in 2009. At this meeting, the City of Orange requested incorporation of Orange General Plan into the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM); therefore, the Orange Traffic Analysis Model (OTAM) was incorporated using the updated Orange General Plan under consideration at the time of this meeting. The six lane configuration between the Santa Ana River and Eckhoff Street was approved at the 2009 meeting. Inasmuch as the Orange General Plan was included in ATAM, the Anaheim General Plan is also included in ATAM which has a six lane primary arterial designation on Orangewood Avenue east of Manchester Avenue, as well as several other locations throughout the City of Anaheim. Response Orange-6 The proposed improvement for the intersection of Orangewood/SR-57 SB ramps is feasible and it is the City of Anaheim’s intent to include the intersection improvement as part of the bridge widening. Due to the feasibility of this improvement, the City of Anaheim anticipates that both Caltrans and the City of Orange would work with the City of Anaheim to implement this improvement. However, since the primary responsibility for approving and/or completing this improvement lies with agencies other than the City of Anaheim, there is the potential that significant impacts may not be fully mitigated if such improvements are not completed for reasons beyond the City of Anaheim’s control. Therefore, the City found the identified impact to be significant and unavoidable. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-41 Responses to Comments 2.3.2 OC PUBLIC WORKS (OCPW) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-42 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-43 Responses to Comments 2.3.2 OC PUBLIC WORKS (OCPW) October 18, 2012 Response OCPW-1 The text on page 5.8-14 shall be modified as follows: MM 5.8-1 Prior to approval issuance of the first grading plan or issuance of first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department, Development Services Division and Orange County Environmental Management Agency (OC) Public Works/OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm; and, b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project- generated drainage and runoff (MEIR 313 MM 3.7-1, Hydrology and Water Resources). ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-44 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-45 Responses to Comments 2.4 OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-46 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-47 Responses to Comments 2.4.1 SELTZER, CAPLAN, MCMAHON, VITEK a (SCMVa) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-48 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-49 Responses to Comments ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-50 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-51 Responses to Comments 2.4.1 SELTZER, CAPLAN, MCMAHON, VITEK a (SCMVa) October 29, 2012 Response SCMVa-1 As detailed in Section 3.3.2, Project Characteristics, of Draft SEIR No. 340 and noted in the comment letter, the project proposes to increase the development intensity within the PR District of the ARSP to allow for the future expansion of the Convention Center and additional hotel development on City-owned land. This expansion would occur on City-owned property and may include redevelopment of certain portions of the Anaheim Convention Center such as the Car Park 1; however, there are no specific design plans or construction documents for this expansion at this time. Further, the timing and exact location for these future actions are not known; however, the increase in development intensity would occur within the bounds of the PR District, as illustrated on Exhibit 3-3 of the Draft SEIR. At the time future development plans are made available, they will be subject to a thorough review by City staff to determine and process the appropriate level of environmental review. Response SCMVa-2 Refer to Response SCMV-1. Response SCMVa-3 Refer to Response SCMV-1. Response SCMVa-4 As indicated in Response SCMV-1, above, this expansion would occur on City-owned property and may include redevelopment of certain portions of the Anaheim Convention Center such as the Car Park 1; however, there are no specific design plans or construction documents for this expansion at this time.. Further, the timing and exact location for these future actions are not known; however, the increase in development intensity would occur within the bounds of the PR District. Because no specific development plans are being considered at this time, the parking requirements, which vary according to the proposed uses, cannot be determined. Future development will, however, be required to comply with the parking requirements set forth in the Section 18.42 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. Response SCMVa-5 As indicated in Response SCMV-1, above, this expansion would occur on City-owned property and may include redevelopment of certain portions of the Anaheim Convention Center such as the Car Park 1; however, there are no specific design plans or construction documents for this expansion at this time. Further, the timing and exact location for these future actions are not known; however, future development does not preclude the demolition of existing structures and redevelopment with proposed uses of higher development densities or differing land uses, provided they comply with the allowable land uses as set forth in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Response SCMVa-6 According to the footnote on page 3-3 of Draft SEIR No. 340, improvements in the precision and technology used for mapping has allowed for a more precise calculation of permitted hotel ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-52 Responses to Comments rooms. Based on the presently available technology and mapping methods, an additional 3,512 hotel rooms could be developed within the C-R district beyond what was previously stated in MEIR No. 313. Although these hotel rooms do not represent an increase in permitted maximum density, Draft SEIR No. 340 includes these rooms as part of its analysis to ensure that all potential environmental impacts are accurately portrayed and analyzed. Response SCMVa-7 On July 21, 2011, ARCADIS, U.S., Inc. submitted a technical memorandum which documented the consistency of the Anaheim 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) conclusions regarding water supply reliability with those of Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment, prepared in November 2009 and supplemented with a Water Demand and Regional Supply Update memo dated November 29, 2010, both of which are provided in Appendix I of the Draft SEIR document. The July 2011 memorandum is included as Appendix B to this Final SEIR document. According to the July 2011 memorandum, the 2010 UWMP updated the City’s estimated current and projected water demands through 2035; and project water supplies available to the City of Anaheim to meet these projected demands. The current and projected water demands identified in the 2010 UWMP are significantly less than the demands projected in the ARSP WSA. For FY 2009-10, the total water demand for retail customers served by Anaheim was approximately 67,000 acre feet per year, or 10,000 acre-feet less than the 77,700 acre-feet projected for 2010 in the ARSP WSA. Based on current projections, the City of Anaheim is not projected to meet that level of demand (77,700 acre-feet per year) until 2035. To address the uncertainties in imported water supplies, the WSA analyzed hypothetical worst-case scenarios considering potential court-ordered reductions in State Water Project deliveries 2007 Judge Wanger decision) caused by environmental issues in the Delta. These worst-case scenarios are presented in Section 6 of the WSA (Possible Water Supply Shortage), and their resulting impacts on imported water supply availability are discussed in the Draft SEIR (Section 5.15.6, Threshold 5.15.2). As discussed in the Conclusion Section of the WSA, if required by extraordinary circumstances, the City can meet its water demands through such actions as increasing production of groundwater beyond the Basin Production Percentage (BPP) up to the basin safe yield and/or decreasing demand through water conservation measures. The City's water supply contingency measures are fully described in Section 5 of the 2010 UWMP, a copy of which is posted at the following web address: http://www.anaheim.net/articlenew2222.asp?id=4400. The City's 2010 UWMP was adopted by the City Council on June 7, 2011. Response SCMVa-8 Katella Avenue will be widened on both sides of the street to a distance of 83 feet from the existing centerline on Katella Avenue. There will be no bus turnouts on Katella Avenue where there are four travel lanes in one direction. The existing bus turnouts will become travel lanes. Response SCMVa-9 Katella Avenue will be widened as adjacent properties redevelop, or when the daily traffic on Katella Avenue reaches the maximum acceptable level. There is no timeframe for the widening. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-53 Responses to Comments Response SCMVa-10 Conceptual cross sections have been developed for the widening of Katella Avenue and are included within the Public Realm chapter of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (refer to Appendix H of the Draft SEIR). As built and/or construction drawings have only been developed for locations already widened, or adjacent to parcels with new development plans. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-54 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-55 Responses to Comments 2.4.2 Seltzer, Caplan, Mcmahon, Vitek b ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-56 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-57 Responses to Comments 2.4.2 SELTZER, CAPLAN, MCMAHON, VITEK b October 30, 2012 Response Comment has been noted and no response is required. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 2-58 Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SECTION 3.0 ERRATA 3.1 TEXT CHANGES TO THE DRAFT EIR The following text changes are made to the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and incorporated as part of the Final SEIR. These changes further substantiate conclusions and/or clarify aspects of the previously circulated document. None of these changes reflect a determination of a new or more significant environmental impact than disclosed in the Final SEIR. Changes to the text are noted with bold and underline (for added text) or strikeout and underline type (for deleted text). Section 1.0 Executive Summary Table 1-2, Third Column MM 5.1-1 Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner/developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning and Building Department for review and approval demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would avoid creating significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses to the maximum extent feasible. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas outdoor eating areas, hotel/motel swimming pools, and residential front and back yards) or structures that include sensitive uses residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. (MEIR 313, MM 3.11-3, Visual Resources and Aesthetics) MM 5.1-5 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, private streets within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area shall have street lights installed which are compatible with the design standards used for the public streets as determined by the Public Utilities Department. (Ord 5454, Condition 3) MM 5.1-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department a letter from a licensed landscape architect certifying that all landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approved in connection with the Final Site Plan. (Ord 5454, Condition 13) MM 5.2-4 Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site (MEIR 313 MM 3.4-4, Air Quality). MM 5.2-5 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department (MEIR 313 MM 3.4-5, Air Quality). MM 5.3-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning and Building Department 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. MM 5.3-2 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist. MM 5.4-3 Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old, property owners/developers shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division, documentation to verify the presence/absence of historic resources. On properties where resources are identified, such documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist. (EIR 330 MM 5.4-1, Cultural Resources). MM 5.5-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer. (MEIR 313 MM 3.6-2, Geology and Soils) MM 5.5-2 Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing. (MEIR 313 MM 3.6-3, Geology and Soils) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MM 5.5-5 Ongoing during grading activities, the property owner/developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division. (MEIR 313 MM 3.6-6, Geology and Soils) MM 5.5-6 Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or geologic hazards and provide a note on plans that all grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the applicable geotechnical investigation. (EIR 330 MM 5.5-1, Geology and Soils) MM 5.7-2 Prior to the removal of USTs, the property owner/developer shall obtain a permit from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department for the removal of such tanks. During the removal of USTs, a representative from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department shall be onsite to direct soil sampling. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-2, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) MM 5.7-3 Ongoing during remediation all remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs, conducted on behalf of the property owner/developer, shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Department. Information on subsurface contamination from USTs shall be provided to the Public Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmental Services Division. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-3, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) MM 5.7-4 Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first the property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval of by the Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if previously unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material or waste, is discovered onsite. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-4, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) MM 5.7-5 Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area affecting any property on a published list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) that has not been officially closed or resolved, a qualified environmental professional, retained by the property owner/developer, shall attempt to contact the current and/or known former property/business owners to obtain information regarding the status of USTs and/or tank closures at these sites. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional, and results of these analyses shall be submitted to the Fire Department and the Environmental Services Division of the Public Utilities Department for review and approval. Appropriate remediation measures will be developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-5, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) MM 5.8-1 Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan for review and approval by the Public Works Department, Development Services Division and Orange County Environmental ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Management Agency (OC) Public Works/OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm; and, b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project- generated drainage and runoff (MEIR 313 MM 3.7-1, Hydrology and Water Resources). MM 5.8-2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one acre of soil, the property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division. (MEIR 313 MM 3.7-3, Hydrology and Water Resources). MM 5.10-8 Ongoing during construction, property owners/developers shall pay for all reasonable costs associated with noise monitoring which shall include monitoring conducted by a certified acoustical engineer under the direction of the Planning and Building Department four times a year on a random basis to ensure that outdoor construction-related sound levels at any point on the exterior project boundary property line do not exceed 60 dBA between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM of the following day where outside construction is occurring. If a complaint is received by the City, additional noise monitoring shall be conducted at the discretion of the City. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is being exceeded, construction activities will be modified immediately to bring the sound level below the 60 dBA requirement, with additional follow-up monitoring conducted to confirm compliance. (Ord 5454, Condition 20) MM 5.10-10 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on- site noise sources are designed to meet the City’s 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more restrictive. MM 5.10-11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on plans indicating that there shall be no operation of large bulldozers or vibratory rollers within 25 feet of any existing home residence. MM 5.10-12 Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. MM 5.14-9 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons’ transportation options,. to These options may include, but are not be limited to, the list below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. a. On-site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on-site services such as the food, retail, and other services. b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs. d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on-site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests. f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts. j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means computer with modem). l. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single- occupant auto to travel to work. m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles. n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools. o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for bicycling to work. p. Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. (MEIR 313 MM 3.3-8 in part) MM 5.15-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems. b. Use of waterway recirculation systems. c. Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals. d. Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves. e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors. f. Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels. g. Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other water- using appliances. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest. i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation. j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible. (MEIR 313 MM 3.9.6-1, Water Service). MM 5.15-2 Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire Department (MEIR 313 MM 3.9.6-3, Water Service). MM 5.15-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, a separate water meter shall be installed for landscape water on all projects where the landscape area exceeds 2,500 square feet in accordance with Ordinance No. 53496160. MM 5.17-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent. Section 5.1 Aesthetics Pages 5.1-9 and 5.1-10, MM 5.1-1 MM 5.1-1 Prior to submittal of each final site plan approval, the property owner/developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning and Building Department for review and approval demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would not avoid creating significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses to the maximum extent feasible. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas outdoor eating areas along Harbor Boulevard, hotel/motel swimming pools, and residential front and back yards) or structures that include sensitive uses residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. If the analysis identifies shade and/or shadow impacts would occur and the building setback, architectural massing and landscape requirement provisions set forth in Section 5.0, Design Plan of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, do not function as feasible mitigation measures, additional technical review of the structure(s) will be required. (MEIR 313, MM 3.11-3, Visual Resources and Aesthetics) Page 5.1-10, MM 5.1-5 MM 5.1-5 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, pPrivate streets within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area shall have street lights installed which are compatible with the design standards used for the public streets as determined by the Public Utilities Department. (Ord 5454, Condition 3) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 5.1-10, MM 5.1-7 MM 5.1-7 That Prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department a letter from a licensed landscape architect shall provide a letter to the Planning Department certifying that all landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approved in connection with the Final Site Plan. (Ord 5454, Condition 13) Section 5.2 Air Quality Page 5.2-28, MMs 5.2-4 and 5.2-5 MM 5.2-4 Prior to approval issuance of each grading permit plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works/Engineering Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Maintenance Department. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site (MEIR 313 MM 3.4-4, Air Quality). MM 5.2-5 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department (MEIR 313 MM 3.4-5, Air Quality). Section 5.3 Biological Resources Page 5.3-5, MMs 5.3-1 and 5.3-2 MM 5.3-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning and Building Department 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MM 5.3-2 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist. Section 5.4 Cultural Resources Page 5.4-9 and 5.4-10, MM 5.4-3 MM 5.4-3 Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old, City staff shall require property owners/developers shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division, to provide studies to documentation to verify the presence/absence of historic resources for areas with documented or inferred resource presence. On properties where resources are identified, such studies documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist. (EIR 330 MM 5.4-1, Cultural Resources). Section 5.5 Geology and Soils Page 5.5-13, MMs 5.5-1 and 5.5-2 MM 5.5-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer. (MEIR 313 MM 3.6-2, Geology and Soils) MM 5.5-2 Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing. (MEIR 313 MM 3.6-3, Geology and Soils) Page 5.5-14, MMs 5.5-5 and 5.5-6 MM 5.5-5 Ongoing during grading activities, the property owner/developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division. (MEIR 313 MM 3.6-6, Geology and Soils) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MM 5.5-6 Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division The City shall require geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or geologic hazards as part of the environmental or development review process and provide a note on plans that all grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the applicable geotechnical investigation. (EIR 330 MM 5.5-1, Geology and Soils) Section 5.7 Geology and Soils Page 5.7-8, MMs 5.7-2 MM 5.7-2 Prior to the removal of USTs, the property owner/developer shall obtain a permit from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department for the removal of such tanks. During the removal of USTs, a representative from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department shall be onsite to direct soil sampling. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-2, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) Page 5.7-9, MMs 5.7-3, 5.7-4, and 5.7-5 MM 5.7-3 Ongoing during remediation all remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs, conducted on behalf of the property owner/developer, shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA)Department. Information on subsurface contamination from USTs shall be provided to the Fire Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmental Services Division. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-3, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) MM 5.7-4 Prior to approval issuance of the first grading plan or issuance of first demolition permit, whichever occurs first the property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval of by the Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if previously unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material or waste, is discovered onsite. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-4, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) MM 5.7-5 Prior to approval issuance of the first grading plan or demolition permit, whichever occurs first for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area affecting the California Chemical Company, 1772 S. Haster Street; Arco Service Station, 1037 W. Ball Road; Avis Rent-a-Car System, 1400 S. Harbor Blvd.; Mobile Service Station, 1800 S. Harbor Blvd.; Shell Service Station, 2100 S. Harbor Blvd; Texaco Service Station, 100 W. Katella Avenue; and Mobil Service Station, 100 E. Katella Way any property on a published list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) that has not been officially closed or resolved, a qualified environmental professional, retained by the property owner/developer, shall attempt to contact the current and/or known former property/business owners to obtain information regarding the status of USTs and/or tank closures at these sites. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional, and results of these analyses shall be submitted to the Fire Department and the Environmental Services Division of the Public Utilities Department for ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program review and approval. Appropriate remediation measures will be developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas. (MEIR 313 MM 3.10-5, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) Section 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Page 5.8-14, MM 5.8-1 MM 5.8-1 Prior to approval issuance of the first grading plan or issuance of first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department, Development Services Division and Orange County Environmental Management Agency (OC) Public Works/OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm; and, b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project- generated drainage and runoff (MEIR 313 MM 3.7-1, Hydrology and Water Resources). Page 5.8-15, MM 5.8-2 MM 5.8-2 Prior to issuance of a grading or demolition permit for sites that disturb more than one acre of soil; and, during clearing, the property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division City Engineer. (MEIR 313 MM 3.7-3, Hydrology and Water Resources). Section 5.10 Noise Page 5.10-28, MM 5.10-8 MM 5.10-8 Ongoing during construction, That the property owners/developers shall pay for all reasonable costs associated with noise monitoring which shall include monitoring conducted by a certified acoustical engineer under the direction of the Planning and Building Department four times a year on a random basis to ensure that outdoor construction-related sound levels at any point on the exterior project boundary property line do not exceed 60 dBA between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM of the following day where outside construction is occurring. If a complaint is received by the City, additional noise monitoring shall be conducted at the discretion of the City. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is being exceeded, construction activities will be modified immediately to bring the sound level below the 60 dBA requirement, with additional follow-up monitoring conducted to confirm compliance. (Ord 5454, Condition 20) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 5.10-29, MMs 5.10-10, 5.10-11, and 5.10-12 MM 5.10-10 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on- site noise sources are designed to meet the City’s 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more restrictive. MM 5.10-11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on plans indicating that there shall be no operation of large bulldozers or vibratory rollers within 25 feet of any existing home residence. MM 5.10-12 Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. Section 5.12 Public Services Page 5.12-14, Existing Conditions The Euclid Library, located at 1340 S. Euclid Street, and the Central Library, located at 500 W. Broadway, are the two closest Anaheim Public Library facilities nearest to The Anaheim Resort. Virtual Anaheim Library services would also be available via the internet. These services include an internet-based library catalog; book reserves and “Book News”, an online access to book clubs and newsletters; the ability to write and read book reviews online and post them in the library catalog through the Library’s Facebook Page; full text printable/downloadable databases including a Business and Company Resource Center, health and wellness resources, magazines, and local and national newspapers; one on one tutoring through Homework Help; and practice tests for school, jobs, and the military. Built in 1963, the Central Library is a 67,500-square-foot facility that provides library service 6 days a week to a local population of approximately 97,570 99,046 residents. The Central Library has a collection of 264,365 270,110 items including print, video, and audio materials. In fiscal year 200810/200911, approximately 55,669 users 58,985 registered card holders borrowed over 670,546 579,677 items. The outlet has seating for 256 262 persons, including seating for 47 55 public access computer workstations. Built in 1976, the Euclid Library is a 10,000-square-foot facility that provides library service 5 days a week to a local population of approximately 73,534 residents. In FY 2010/11, Euclid had a service population of 74,303 residents and a collection of 59,819 The Euclid Library has a collection of 70,229 items including print, dvds/videos, and audio materials. In FY 2010/11, 18,717 registered card holders borrowed 129,162 To date, there are approximately 19,769 borrowers who have borrowed over 139,213 items. The outlet has seating for 102 101 persons, including seating for 22 24 public access computer workstations. As shown in Table 5.12-5, the Euclid Library is undersized compared to current Library Service Indicators. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 5.12-14, Table 5.12-5 TABLE 5.12-5 LIBRARY SERVICE INDICATORS Factor National Library Norms (HALPR’s Index) Euclid Branch of APL Square Feet per capita 0.3–0.5 sf 0.2 0.13 sf Volumes per square feet owned per capita 4.0–6.2 volumes 4.5 4.82 volumes Circulation per capita 4.5 4.04 1.74 Electronic Resource Use per capita .9 1.1 0.45 Information Assistance per capita 1.1 0.79 0.82 sf: square feet Source: Lujan 2009 and 2012. Page 5.12-18 California, State of. 2010. California Government Code (Sections 65995–65998). Sacramento, CA: The State of California. http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi- bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=65001-66000&file=65995-65998. Lujan, A. 2012 (October 15). Personal communication. Email from A. Lujan (Anaheim Library Services Department) to S. Kim (Anaheim Planning Department) entitled RE: PUBLIC INVITED TO SUBMIT COMMENTS TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN. Lujan, A. 2009 (December Personal communication. Email from A. Lujan (Anaheim Library Services Department) to A. Armanino (BonTerra Consulting) entitled Impacts of Library Services – Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Amendment. Section 5.14 Transportation and Traffic Page 5.14-4, last paragraph Peak hour analyses were performed for 81 study intersections, including 64 intersections in the City of Anaheim, 2 shared intersections between the cities of Anaheim and Orange, and 159 intersections in the City of Orange. Page 5.14-8 through 5.14-10, Table 5.14-6 TABLE 5.14-6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-1** Euclid St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.89 D 1.02 F I-2 Ninth St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.53 A I-3 Walnut St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.57 A 0.55 A I-4 Walnut St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.43 A 0.53 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-14 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TABLE 5.14-6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-5 Disneyland Dr/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.68 B 0.76 C I-6 Disneyland Dr/West St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.57 A I-7 Harbor Blvd/Vermont Ave Anaheim 0.56 A 0.58 A I-8 Harbor Blvd/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.73 C 0.68 B I-9 Harbor Blvd/I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.54 A 0.54 A I-10 Harbor Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.32 A 0.34 A I-11 Harbor Blvd/Disney Way Anaheim 0.33 A 0.42 A I-12 Harbor Blvd/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.55 A 0.63 B I-13 Harbor Blvd/Convention Way Anaheim 0.29 A 0.35 A I-14 Harbor Blvd/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.55 A 0.57 A I-15 Clementine St/Disney Way Anaheim 0.19 A 0.23 A I-16 Clementine St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.60 A I-17 I-5 Southbound Off Ramp/Disney Way Anaheim* 0.20 A 0.24 A I-18 Anaheim Blvd/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.63 B 0.91 E I-19 Anaheim Blvd/Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.49 A 0.71 C I-20 Anaheim Blvd/I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.44 A 0.59 A I-21 Anaheim Blvd/Disney Way Anaheim* 0.44 A 0.49 A I-22 Anaheim Blvd/Haster St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.47 A 0.58 A I-23 Haster St/Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-24 Haster St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.54 A 0.65 B I-25 Manchester Ave (I-5 Southbound Ramps)/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.55 A 0.52 A I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.46 A 0.50 A I-27 East St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.51 A 0.67 B I-28 Lewis St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.41 A 0.53 A I-29 Lewis St/Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.28 A 0.31 A I-30 Lewis St/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.48 A 0.62 B I-31 Lewis St/Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-32 I-5 HOV Ramps/Gene Autry Way Anaheim* 0.07 A 0.07 A I-33 Lewis St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.53 A 0.48 A I-34 Manchester Ave/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.52 A 0.37 A I-35 Anaheim Way/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.36 A 0.50 A I-36 State College Blvd/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.57 A 0.65 B I-37 State College Blvd/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.43 A 0.53 A I-38 State College Blvd/Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.30 A 0.29 A I-39 State College Blvd/Orangewood Ave Anaheim/Orange 0.46 A 0.47 A I-40 State College Blvd/Orange Center Dr Anaheim/Orange 0.21 A 0.21 A I-41 State College Blvd/I-5 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.33 A 0.28 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-15 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TABLE 5.14-6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-42 State College Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.43 A 0.28 A I-43 State College Blvd/The City Dr/ Chapman Ave Orange 0.71 C 0.66 B I-44 Sunkist St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.82 D 0.79 C I-45 Howell Ave/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.38 A 0.55 A I-46 Rampart St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.51 A 0.44 A I-47 Rampart St/Chapman Ave Orange 0.31 A 0.31 A I-48 Ball Rd/SR-57 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.54 A 0.58 A I-49 Ball Rd/SR-57 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.69 B 0.57 A I-50 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.36 A 0.40 A I-51 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.40 A 0.40 A I-52 Orangewood Ave/SR-57 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.52 A 0.49 A I-53 Orangewood Ave/SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.61 B 0.68 B I-54 Phoenix Club Dr/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.48 A 0.59 A I-55 Douglass Rd/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.41 A 0.49 A I-56 Eckhoff St/Orangewood Ave Orange 0.56 A 0.69 B I-57 Main St/Taft Ave Orange 0.68 B 0.73 C I-58 Main St/Katella Ave Orange 0.50 A 0.50 A I-59 Batavia St/Taft Ave Orange 0.65 B 0.67 B I-60 Clementine St/Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-61 Clementine St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.33 A 0.33 A I-62 Flower St/Chapman Ave Orange 0.38 A 0.49 A I-63 Harbor Blvd/Chapman Ave Anaheim 0.55 A 0.61 B I-64 I-5 Ramps/Chapman Ave Orange* 0.43 A 0.46 A I-65 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/ Chapman Ave Orange* 0.40 A 0.39 A I-66 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/ Chapman Ave Orange* 0.54 A 0.52 A I-67 Euclid St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.59 A 0.66 B I-68 Walnut St/Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.56 A 0.47 A I-69 Disneyland Dr/I-5 Southbound Off Ramp Anaheim* 0.35 A 0.29 A I-70 Disneyland Dr/Magic Way Anaheim 0.28 A 0.30 A I-71 Ox Rd/Cast Place/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.56 A 0.55 A I-72 Convention Center/Katella Ave Anaheim 0.39 A 0.41 A I-73 Harbor Blvd/Lincoln Ave Anaheim 0.61 B 0.76 C I-74 Harbor Blvd/Broadway Anaheim 0.50 A 0.67 B I-75 Harbor Blvd/Manchester Ave Anaheim 0.29 A 0.43 A I-76 Anaheim Blvd/Lincoln Ave Anaheim 0.47 A 0.60 A I-77 Anaheim Blvd/Broadway Anaheim 0.46 A 0.52 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-16 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TABLE 5.14-6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-78 Olive St/Lincoln Ave Anaheim 0.40 A 0.43 A I-79 Flore St/West St/Ball Rd Anaheim 0.53 A 0.47 A I-80 West St/Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.61 B 0.72 C I-81 Struck Ave/Katella Ave Orange 0.28 A 0.34 A Note: * Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction* The intersection of Euclid St/Katella Ave is currently under construction to enhance capacity. The intersection of Euclid Street/Katella Avenue is currently under construction to enhance capacity. Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010. Page 5.14-44 through 5.14-46, Table 5.14-25 TABLE 5.14-25 RECOMMENDED 2030 INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project Scenario Without Mitigation 2030 With Project Scenario With Mitigation Recommended Mitigation Strategy AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I-1 Euclid St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.87 D 0.94 E 0.87 D 0.89 D Restripe NBR to NBTR, add 400’ NB departure lane (widen) I-2 Ninth St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.95 E 0.97 E 0.88 D 0.80 C Add 2nd NBL (Restripe #1 SB lane) I-5 Disneyland Dr/ Ball Rd Anaheim 0.87 D 0.92 E 0.83 D 0.87 D Add NBL, Restripe NB to 2L, 2T, 1R and SB to 2L, 2T. Remove Split Phase I-6 Disneyland Dr/ West St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.96 E 0.94 E 0.85 D 0.90 D Restripe EBR to EBT, Restripe WBR to WBT and add 4th WB lane to the Simba parking lot entrance I-8 Harbor Blvd/ Ball Rd Anaheim 1.10 F 0.96 E 0.90 D 0.90 D Add NBT, SBT, EBT, EBR I-18 Anaheim Blvd/ Ball Rd Anaheim 0.88 D 1.01 F 0.82 D 0.90 D Add NBR, EBL, EBR I-19 Anaheim Blvd/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.86 D 1.03 F 0.68 B 0.86 D Add NBL, SBL, WBR, Restripe WB approach to 2L, 1TR, 1R I-20 Anaheim Blvd/ I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.66 B 0.95 E 0.55 A 0.85 D Add SBT ( in median) I-22 Anaheim Blvd/ Haster St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.90 D 0.92 E 0.90 D 0.90 D Add WBR ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TABLE 5.14-25 RECOMMENDED 2030 INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project Scenario Without Mitigation 2030 With Project Scenario With Mitigation Recommended Mitigation Strategy AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I-23 Haster St/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.97 E 1.17 F 0.78 C 0.88 D Add WBL, SBL, SBR I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/ Katella Ave Anaheim* 0.95 E 0.90 D 0.82 D 0.78 C Add EBT, WBT I-29 Lewis St/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim 0.85 D 0.95 E 0.85 D 0.89 D Add WBR I-30 Lewis St/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.85 D 1.28 F 0.70 B 0.83 D Add NBL, NBT, SBL, SBR, WBT; Restripe SB to 2L, 1T, 1TR, 1R I-37 State College Blvd/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.94 E 0.99 E 0.90 D 0.85 D Add WBR, EBR; Restripe SB to 2L, 2T, 2R; EB to 3L, 3T, 1R I-38 State College Blvd/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim 1.02 F 0.84 D 0.90 D 0.73 C Add SBR I-39 State College Blvd/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim/ Orange 0.91 E 0.97 E 0.88 D 0.90 D Add NBR and WBT I-43 State College Blvd/ The City Dr/ Chapman Ave Orange 0.88 D 0.96 E 0.83 D 0.80 C Restripe WBT to WBTR I-45 Howell Ave/ Katella Ave Anaheim 0.62 B 0.95 E 0.62 B 0.85 D Add WBR I-46 Rampart St/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim 0.78 C 1.13 F 0.73 C 0.80 C Add NB Free Right, Add SBL I-53 Orangewood Ave/ SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.84 D 1.04 F 0.79 C 0.89 D Add WBL (Restripe) I-55 Douglass Rd/ Katella Ave Anaheim 1.04 F 1.09 F 0.84 D 0.87 D Add NBT and SBT; Reconfigure NBTR to NBT, Reconfigure SBTR to SBT, Add EBT and WBT Note: * Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-18 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Pages 5.14-67 and 5.14-68, MM 5.14-9 MM 5.14-9 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons’ transportation options,. to These options may include, but are are not be limited to, the following list below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. a. On-site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on-site services such as the food, retail, and other services be provided. b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members be developed for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs. d. Transit Pass. Promote Southern California Rapid Transit District and Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes be promoted through financial assistance and on-site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. e. Commuter Bus. As commuter “express” bus service expands throughout the region, passes for use on these lines may be provided for employees who choose to use this service. Financial incentives be provided. e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project be generated, and offer a local shuttle program offered to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests. f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. g. Rental Car Fleet. A “fleet” vehicle program be developed to provide employees who travel to work by means other than an automobile with access to automobiles in case of emergency, medical appointments, etc. This service would help employees use alternative modes of transportation by ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ensuring that they would be able to have personal transportation in the event of special circumstances. g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts. j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means computer with modem). l. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work. m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles may be provided. n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 60 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools. o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees offered financial incentives for bicycling to work. p. Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. be offered to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. q. Actively recruit prospective employees residing within a 3-minute commute shed. q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. (MEIR 313 MM 3.3-8 in part) ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-20 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 5.14-72 and Page 5.14-73, Table 5.14-34 TABLE 5.14-34 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ID Location Jurisdiction Impact Mitigation Strategy Comments Intersection I-1 Euclid St/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Restripe NBR to NBTR, add 400’ NB departure lane (widen) Override I-2 Ninth St/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add 2nd NBL (Restripe #1 SB lane) I-5 Disneyland Dr/ Ball Rd Anaheim Project Add NBL, Restripe NB to 2L, 2T, 1R and SB to 2L, 2T. Remove Split Phase Override I-6 Disneyland Dr/ West St/ Katella Avea Anaheim Project Restripe EBR to EBT, Restripe WBR to WBT and add 4th WB lane to the Simba parking lot entrance Partial Override I-8 Harbor Blvd/ Ball Rd Anaheim Project Add NBT, SBT, EBT, EBR Override I-18 Anaheim Blvd/ Ball Rdb Anaheim Project Add NBR, EBL, EBR I-19 Anaheim Blvd/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim Project Add NBL, SBL, WBR, Restripe WB approach to 2L, 1TR, 1R I-20 Anaheim Blvd/ I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* Project Add SBT ( in median) I-22 Anaheim Blvd/ Haster St/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add WBR Override I-23 Haster St/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim Project Add WBL, SBL, SBR I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/ Katella Ave Anaheim* Project Add EBT, WBT I-29 Lewis St/ Cerritos Ave Anaheim Project Add WBR I-30 Lewis St/ Katella Aveb Anaheim Project Add NBL, NBT, SBL, SBR, WBT; Restripe SB to 2L, 1T, 1TR, 1R ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-21 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TABLE 5.14-34 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ID Location Jurisdiction Impact Mitigation Strategy Comments I-37 State College Blvd/ Katella Avec Anaheim Project Add WBR, EBR; Restripe SB to 2L, 2T, 2R, EB to 3L, 3T, 1R Partial Override I-38 State College Blvd/ Gene Autry Way Anaheim Project Add SBR I-39 State College Blvd/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim/ Orange Project Add NBR and WBT Override I-43 State College Blvd/ The City Dr/ Chapman Ave Orange Project Restripe WBT to WBTR I-45 Howell Ave/ Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add WBR I-46 Rampart St/ Orangewood Ave Anaheim Project Add NB Free Right, Add SBL I-53 Orangewood Ave/ SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange Project Add WBL (Restripe) Override I-55 Douglass Rd/ Katella Ave Anaheim* Project Add NBT and SBT, Reconfigure NBTR to NBT, Reconfigure SBTR to SBT, Add EBT and WBT Arterial Segments A-35 Katella Ave between Disneyland Dr and Hotel Wayd Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-36 Katella Ave between Hotel Way and Harbor Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-37 Katella Ave between Harbor Blvd and Clementine Std Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-38 Katella Ave between Clementine St and Anaheim Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-39 Katella Ave between Anaheim Blvd and Manchester Aved Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane arterial A-40a Katella Ave between Manchester Ave and Anaheim Way Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8- lane Stadium Smart St ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-22 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TABLE 5.14-34 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES ID Location Jurisdiction Impact Mitigation Strategy Comments Ramp Termini Intersections I-20 Anaheim Blvd/ I-5 Northbound Rampse Anaheim Project Add 4th SBT I-25 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave Anaheim Project Add 4th EBT, Add 4th WBT I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps)/ Katella Avee Anaheim Project Add 4th EBT, Add 5th WBT I-53 Orangewood Ave/ SR-57 Southbound Rampse Orange Project Add WBL(restripe) Override a EB improvements are not being overridden b Intersection deficient in 2015 but no project related significant impact. The improvements from 2030 should be expedited to 2015 at these locations for the intersection to operate at an acceptable LOS in 2015 with the exception of the improvement at Katella Ave and Lewis St, which is infeasible in 2015. c Override recommended for restriping one EBT to EBL only d Arterial Segment deficient in 2015 e Intersection identified as deficient under both ICU and HCM analysis. * Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Section 5.15 Water Supply and Infrastructure Page 5.15-7, MM 5.15-1 MM 5.15-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems. b. Use of waterway recirculation systems. c. Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals. d. Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves. e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors. f. Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels. g. Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other water- using appliances. h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest. i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-23 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible. (MEIR 313 MM 3.9.6-1, Water Service). Page 5.15-8, MM 5.15-2 MM 5.15-2 Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire Department (MEIR 313 MM 3.9.6-3, Water Service). Page 5.15-9, MM 5.15-7 MM 5.15-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, a separate water meter shall be installed for landscape water on all projects where the landscape area exceeds 2,500 square feet in accordance with Ordinance No. 53496160. (Ord 5454, Condition 40) Section 5.17 Electricity Page 5.17-5, MM 5.17-3 MM 5.17-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 3-24 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SECTION 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM This section presents the Mitigation Monitoring ting Program (MMP) for the Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, which identifies the mitigation measures, standard conditions of approval, monitoring timing, responsible agency/party, and the monitoring agency/party responsible for ensuring each recommended mitigation measure is implemented. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Terms and Definitions 1. Property Owner/Developer − Any owner or developer of real property within the Anaheim Report Specific Plan Area. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing − Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning and Building Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted Fee Schedule. 3. Timing − This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsibility for Monitoring − Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures − The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction,” the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction. 6. Building Permit − For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building. AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATED AND MODIFIED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 85c ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion AESTHETICS MM 5.1-1 Prior to final site plan approval Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner/developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning and Building Department for review and approval demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would avoid creating significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses to the maximum extent feasible. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas outdoor eating areas, hotel/motel swimming pools, and residential front and back yards) or structures that include sensitive uses residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-2 Prior to issuance of building permits Prior to issuance of building permits, all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of the building shall be shown on plans as fully screened from view of adjacent public rights-of-way and from adjacent properties by architectural devices and/or appropriate building materials. A note indicating that these improvements will be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-3 Ongoing Ongoing, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the removal of any on-site graffiti within 24 hours of its application. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-4 Prior to Final Site Plan approval Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the location and configuration of all lighting fixtures including ground-mounted lighting fixtures utilized to accent buildings, landscape elements, or to illuminate pedestrian areas shall be shown on all Final Site Plans. All proposed surface parking area lighting fixtures shall be down-lighted with a maximum height of 12 feet adjacent to any residential properties. All lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighting toward the area to be illuminated and away from adjacent residential property lines. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-5 Prior to final building and zoning inspections Prior to final building and zoning inspections, private streets within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area shall have street lights installed which are compatible with the design standards used for the public streets as determined by the Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department MM 5.1-6 Prior to final building and zoning inspections Prior to final building and zoning inspections, root and sidewalk barriers shall be provided for trees within seven feet of public sidewalks. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspections Prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department a letter from a licensed landscape architect certifying that all landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approved in connection with the Final Site Plan. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5.1-8 Ongoing Ongoing, all on-site non-Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, and Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, within area in which dedication has not been accepted by the City, shall be maintained by the property owner/developer, in compliance with City standards. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-9 Ongoing Ongoing, any tree planted within the Setback Realm shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-10 Ongoing Ongoing, a licensed arborist shall be hired by the property owner/developer to be responsible for all tree trimming. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-11 Prior to issuance of each building permits Prior to issuance of each building permits, unless records indicate previous payment, a fee for street tree purposes shall be paid or cause to be paid to the City of Anaheim based on the length of street frontage in an amount as established by City Council resolution or credit against the fee given for City authorized improvements installed by the property owner/developer. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-12 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be shown on plans as shielded from public view and the sound buffered to comply with City of Anaheim noise ordinances from any adjacent residential or transient-occupied properties. A note indicating that these improvements shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-13 Prior to Final Site Plan approval Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that the rear elevations of buildings visible from off-site areas shall be architecturally accented to portray a finished look. Planning and Building Department MM 5.1-14 Prior to Final Site Plan approval Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that no shuttle/bus/vehicular drop- off areas shall be permitted in hotel/motel or vacation resort front setback area. Planning and Building Department AIR QUALITY MM 5.2-1 Ongoing during project operation Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as practicable. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5.2-2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. The property owner/developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property owner/developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage: a. Use non-solvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; b. Use solvent-based coatings, where they are necessary. Planning and Building Department MM 5.2-3 Ongoing during construction Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce construction-related air quality impacts. These measures shall include, but are not limited to: a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable. b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as parking) on-site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the on-site haul roads shall be paved. c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil binders, according to manufacturer’s specification, to exposed piles. d. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported from the project site occur. e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered prior to Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion entering public streets. g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas. h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes. i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less. k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts. l. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.) where practicable. n. Utilize existing power sources power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned. p. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable. MM 5.2-4 Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan) Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5.2-5 Prior to the issuance of each building permit Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department. Planning and Building Department MM 5.2-6 Prior to the issuance of each building permit Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce operation-related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors. b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances. c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in building design, such as appropriate passive solar design. d. Use drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used in pumping and transporting water. e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or participate in a joint development daycare center f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment current at the time makes this installation infeasible. Planning and Building Department MM 5.2-7 Prior to issuance of the first building permit Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for any proposed sensitive land uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be located within 500 feet of the near edge of the I-5 freeway unless it is demonstrated that the health risks have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the SCAQMD at the time of building permit application. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MM 5.3-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning and Building Department 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. Planning and Building Department MM 5.3-2 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist. Planning and Building Department CULTURAL RESOURCES MM 5.4-1 Prior to issuance of each grading permit Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. MM 5.4-2 Prior to issuance of each grading permit Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. Planning and Building Department MM 5.4-3 Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old, property owners/developers shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division, documentation to verify the presence/absence of historic resources. On properties where resources are identified, such documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist. Planning and Building Department GEOLOGY AND SOILS MM 5.5-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5.5-2 Prior to issuance of each foundation permit Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing. Planning and Building Department MM 5.5-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Planning Department, Building Services Division for review and approval showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the California Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim. Planning and Building Department MM 5.5-4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection for a hotel/motel Prior to the final building and zoning inspection for a hotel/motel, the property owner/developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review and approval by the Fire Department. The plan shall require posted notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures and incorporate ongoing earthquake training for hotel staff to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Fire Department MM 5.5-5 Ongoing during grading activities Ongoing during grading activities, the property owner/developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division. Planning and Building Department MM 5.5-6 Prior to issuance of building or grading permits Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or geologic hazards and provide a note on plans that all grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the applicable geotechnical investigation. Planning and Building Department HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MM 5.7-1 Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first, in areas of former service stations, in areas known or thought to have been previously occupied by USTs, and in areas where tank removal has not been verified prior to excavation or grading the property owner/developer shall retain the services of a qualified environmental professional to conduct an investigation for known, or the presence of, tanks, using geophysical methods. Soil sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required if soil sampling results are not available, or indicate contamination is present above regulatory guidelines. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken in these areas, and appropriate remediation measures developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas. Fire Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5.7-2 Prior to the removal of USTs Prior to the removal of USTs, the property owner/developer shall obtain a permit from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department for the removal of such tanks. During the removal of USTs, a representative from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department shall be onsite to direct soil sampling. Fire Department MM 5.7-3 Ongoing during remediation all remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs Ongoing during remediation all remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs, conducted on behalf of the property owner/developer, shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). Information on subsurface contamination from USTs shall be provided to the Public Utilities Department, Environmental Services Division. Fire Department Public Utilities Department MM 5.7-4 Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading demolition permit, whichever occurs first the property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval by the Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if previously unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material or waste, is discovered onsite. Fire Department MM 5.7-5 Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area affecting any property on a published list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) that has not been officially closed or resolved, a qualified environmental professional, retained by the property owner/developer, shall attempt to contact the current and/or known former property/business owners to obtain information regarding the status of USTs and/or tank closures at these sites. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional, and results of these analyses shall be submitted to the Fire Department and the Environmental Services Division of the Public Utilities Department for review and approval. Appropriate remediation measures will be developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas. Fire Department Public Utilities Department MM 5.7-6 Ongoing during project demolition and construction Ongoing during project demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), and according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. Fire Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5.7-7 Prior to issuance of any discretionary permit for a current or former hazardous waste disposal site or solid waste disposal site Prior to issuance of any discretionary permit for a current or former hazardous waste disposal site or solid waste disposal site, the project property owner/developer shall submit a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to the City. If possible hazardous materials are identified during the site assessments, the appropriate response/remedial measures will be implemented in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. Fire Department HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MM 5.8-1 Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan for review and approval by the Public Works Department, Development Services Division and Orange County (OC) Public Works/OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm; and, b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project- generated drainage and runoff. Public Works Department MM 5.8-2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one acre of soil Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one acre of soil, the property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division. Planning and Building Department MM 5.8-3 Ongoing during project operations Ongoing during project operations, the property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim on a basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots. The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited. Planning and Building Department MM 5.8-4 Prior to each final building and zoning inspection Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City certifying that the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans. Planning and Building Department MM 5.8-5 Prior to final building and zoning inspection Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install piping on-site with project water mains so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available. Public Utilities Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-14 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5.8-6 Prior to issuance of building permits Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works Department NOISE 5.10-1 Ongoing during construction, Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers. Planning and Building Department 5.10-2 Prior to approval of each final site plan Prior to approval of each final site plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise-sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property owner/developer prior to final building and zoning inspections. Planning and Building Department 5.10-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, for structures that are adjacent to noise- sensitive areas such as residences, the property owner/developer shall ensure that all mechanical ventilation units are shown on plans and installed in compliance with Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Planning and Building Department 5.10-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit for a parking structure Prior to issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall ensure that noise from parking structures adjacent to residential areas will be reduced by the provision of convenient access to parking facilities, sound attenuation devices (louvers and walls), the use of textured deck surfaces to reduce tire squalling, and tiering a parking facility to provide greater distance to the receptor. Planning and Building Department 5.10-5 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on building plans indicating that during construction, the property owner/developer shall install and maintain specially designed construction barriers at the project perimeter areas. The construction sound barriers shall be a minimum height of 8 feet with a minimum surface weight of 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. The structure shall be a continuous barrier. Gates and other entry doors shall be constructed with suitable mullions, astragals, seals, or other design techniques to minimize sound leakage when in the closed position. Access doors should be self closing where feasible. Vision ports are permissible providing they are filled with an acceptable solid vision product. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-15 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.10-6 Ongoing during construction and project operation Ongoing during construction and project operation, pressure washing operations for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to graffiti or other aesthetical considerations shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM. Planning and Building Department 5.10-7 Ongoing during construction and project operation Ongoing during construction and project operation, sweeping operations in the parking facilities and private on-site roadways shall be performed utilizing sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than 60 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line. Planning and Building Department 5.10-8 Ongoing during construction Ongoing during construction, property owners/developers shall pay for all reasonable costs associated with noise monitoring which shall include monitoring conducted by a certified acoustical engineer under the direction of the Planning and Building Department four times a year on a random basis to ensure that outdoor construction- related sound levels at any point on the exterior project boundary property line do not exceed 60 dBA between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM of the following day where outside construction is occurring. If a complaint is received by the City, additional noise monitoring shall be conducted at the discretion of the City. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is being exceeded, construction activities will be modified immediately to bring the sound level below the 60 dBA requirement, with additional follow-up monitoring conducted to confirm compliance. Planning and Building Department 5.10-9 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels would be less than 65 dBA CNEL for outdoor use areas (including dining patios, pools, playgrounds, or outdoor gathering areas). This requirement can be accomplished through shielding areas behind buildings or the construction of a noise barrier. Planning and Building Department 5.10-10 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on-site noise sources are designed to meet the City’s 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more restrictive. Planning and Building Department 5.10-11 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on plans indicating that there shall be no operation of large bulldozers or vibratory rollers within 25 feet of any existing residence. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-16 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.10-12 Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. Planning and Building Department PUBLIC SERVICES 5.12-1 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security provisions during both the construction and operative phases for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including the concept of crime prevention through environmental design building design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas). Police Department 5.12-2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a parking structure Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit television monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department. Said measures shall be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections. Police Department 5.12-3 Ongoing during project operation Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall provide private security on the premises to maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to review and approval of the Police Department. The use of security patrols and electronic security devices video monitors) should be considered to reduce the potential for criminal activity in the area. Police Department 5.12-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the project design shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department. Police Department 5.12-5 Prior to commencement of structural framing on each parcel or lot Prior to commencement of structural framing on each parcel or lot, onsite fire hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner/developer as required and approved by the Fire Department. Fire Department 5.12-6 Prior to issuance of each grading permit Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to the Fire Department for review and approval to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department service requirements. Fire Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.12-7 Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to the final building and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to the final building and zoning inspection, plans shall indicate that all buildings, exclusive of parking structures, shall have sprinklers installed by the property owner/developer in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed prior to each final building and zoning inspection. Fire Department 5.12-8 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including: a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of access roads. b. Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 75,000 pounds. c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required at all entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department. d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of 400 feet apart. e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. Fire Department 5.12-9 Prior to issuance of the first building permit Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid their fair share of the funding to accommodate the following, which will serve the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area: a. One additional fire truck company. b. One additional paramedic company. c. Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units, additional manpower, equipment and facilities. d. A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability. e. A medical triage vehicle/trailer, equipped with sufficient trauma dressings, medical Fire Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-18 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion supplies, stretchers, etc., to handle 1,000 injured persons, and an appropriate storage facility. The determination of the allocable share of costs attributable to the property owner/developer shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such equipment/facilities among property owners/developers in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan Area, the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area or the otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. Note: To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic Services Impact Fee Program. Compliance with this Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5496 and Resolution No. 95R-73 dated May 16, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements. 5.12-10 Prior to each final building and zoning inspection Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department. Fire Department 5.12-11 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan to the Fire Department for review and approval detailing accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow. Fire Department 5.12-12 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit, plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as being in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code. Fire Department 5.12-13 Prior to the placement of building materials on a building site Prior to the placement of building materials on a building site, an all-weather road shall be provided from the roadway system to and on the construction site and for fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire Department. Such routes shall be paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to Fire Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet the requirements of Section 10.204 of the Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by the City of Anaheim. Fire Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.12-14 Prior to approval of building plans Prior to approval of building plans, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence to the satisfaction of the Fire Department that all lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates shall be equipped with “knox box” devices as required and approved by the Fire Department. Fire Department 5.12-15 Prior to approval of on-site water plans Prior to approval of on-site water plans, unless each commercial building is initially connected to separate fire services, an unsubordinated covenant satisfactory to the City Attorney’s Office shall be recorded prohibiting any individual sale of buildings until separate fire services are installed in the building(s) subject to the sale. Fire Department 5.12-16 Prior to approval of water improvement plans Prior to approval of water improvement plans, the water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection services in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Fire Department 5.12-17 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of compliance with Government Code Section 53080 (Schools). Planning and Building Department 5.12-18 Ongoing Ongoing, the City will work cooperatively with school districts to identify opportunities for new schools and school expansion. Planning and Building Department 5.12-19 Prior to the issuance of a building permit Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.385, Public Library Facilities Services Areas – Payment of Fees Required. Planning and Building Department TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 5.14-1 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, the property owner/developer shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when the improvements identified in this traffic analysis shall be designed and constructed. Public Works Department 5.14-2 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the property owner/developer. The property owner shall also participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts, which have been established. Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-20 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.14-3 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan. Public Works Department 5.14-4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in conjunction with the on-going operation of the project. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these programs ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. Public Works Department 5.14-5 Prior to the issuance of grading permits Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN recommendations to the extent feasible. Public Works Department 5.14-6 Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a hotel development that exceeds 100 rooms per gross acre within the Commercial Recreation District within the Convention Center Medium density category Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a hotel development that exceeds 100 rooms per gross acre within the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) within the Convention Center (CC) Medium density category, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement TDM measures sufficient to reduce the actual trip generation from the development to no more than the trips assumed by the City’s traffic model. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office. Public Works Department 5.14-7 Ongoing during construction Ongoing during construction, if the Anaheim Police Department or the Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair-share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. Police Department Public Works Department 5.14-8 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office. Objectives of the TDM program shall be: a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests. b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project- Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-21 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion generated trips. c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership. 5.14-9 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons’ transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. a. On-site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on-site services such as the food, retail, and other services. b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs. d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on-site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests. f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-22 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts. j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means computer with modem). l. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work. m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles. n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools. o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for bicycling to work. p. Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. 5.14-10 Prior to approval of each tentative tract or parcel map Prior to approval of each tentative tract or parcel map, the following Street Design Elements shall be shown on each tentative tract or parcel map: a. Street cross-sections, including dimensions, labels, circulation designation Resort Secondary) and whether public or private. Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-23 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion b. Street grades and vertical alignment. c. Horizontal alignment, including radii, and cul-de-sac radii. 5.14-11 Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, in the event that a parcel is subdivided and there is a need for common on-site circulation and/or parking, prior to recordation of a subdivision map, an unsubordinated covenant providing for reciprocal access and/or parking, as appropriate, approved by the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager, shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning and Department. If the reciprocal access is across parcel lines or if public rights of way are required for reciprocal access; Public Works approval shall be required. Planning and Building Department 5.14-12 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the location of any proposed gates across a driveway shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates shall conform to the current version of Engineering Standard Detail No. 475. Public Works Department 5.14-13 Prior to the issuance of building permits Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall show that all driveways shall be constructed with a minimum fifteen (15) foot radius curb returns as required by the City Engineer, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Public Works Department 5.14-14 Prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first, security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, completion guarantee, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and drainage facilities and other appurtenant work, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with the specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, as may be modified by the City Engineer. Installation of said improvements shall occur prior to final building and zoning inspections. Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-24 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.14-15 Based upon the improvement phasing analysis in the project traffic study Based upon the improvement phasing analysis in the project traffic study, the property owner/developer shall implement traffic improvements as identified in the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards, and methodologies established by the Orange County Congestion Management Program and the City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction, and fair-share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The property owner/developer shall construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. Public Works Department 5.14-16 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in MM 5.14-1, property owners/developers will determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in MM 5.14-1. Public Works Department 5.14-17 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in MM 5.14-1, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation with the City of Orange: a. The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair-share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis. b. The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange. c. The property owner/developer shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities. Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-25 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.14-18 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in MM 5.14-1, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans: a. The traffic study will identify the project’s proportionate impact on the specific freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair-share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance, performance standards, and methodologies established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and the City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. b. The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with Caltrans. Public Works Department 5.14-19 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in MM 5.14-15. The City shall allocate the property owner/developer’s fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City. Public Works Department 5.14-20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Public Works Department 5.14-21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact that will be responsible for coordinating with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on-site coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the project with the ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-26 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.14-22 Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of the first Final Site Plan Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the recommended improvements. Public Works Department WATER SUPPLY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.15-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation) Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems. b. Use of waterway recirculation systems. c. Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals. d. Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves. e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors. f. Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels. g. Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other water- using appliances. h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest. i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation. j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible. Public Utilities Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-27 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.15-2 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire Department. Public Utilities Department Fire Department 5.15-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80 psi or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property owner/developer’s service. Planning and Building Department 5.15-4 Prior to the issuance of each building permit Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan which shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The irrigation plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system. The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils, that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies, and that surface runoff and overwatering is minimized. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall include water-conserving features such as low flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water-conserving equipment. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall indicate that separate irrigation lines for recycled water shall be constructed and recycled water will be used when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. Planning and Building Department 5.15-5 Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan and building permits Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan and building permits, plans shall specifically show that the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment will be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, aboveground and behind the building setback line in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys and in accordance with Ordinance No. 4156. Prior to the final building and zoning inspections, the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, in accordance with the Final Site Plan and the building permit plans. Public Utilities Department 5.15-6 Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous payment Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous payment, the appropriate fees for Primary Mains, Secondary Mains and Fire Protection Service shall be paid to the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division in accordance with Rule 15A, and Rule 20 of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules and Regulations. Public Utilities Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-28 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.15-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspections Prior to final building and zoning inspections, a separate water meter shall be installed for landscape water on all projects where the landscape area exceeds 2,500 square feet in accordance with Ordinance No. 5349. Planning and Building Department 5.15-8 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall be amended to include: a. Construction of a new well with a minimum 1,500 GPM capacity to serve The Anaheim Resort Area (tentative location near Ponderosa Park and Orangewood Avenue); and b. Construction of a new 16-inch water main along Harbor Boulevard from Orangewood to Chapman Avenue. Public Utilities Department 5.15-9 Ongoing Ongoing, the City shall continue to collaborate with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), its member agencies, and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to ensure that available water supplies meet anticipated demand. If it is forecasted that water demand exceeds available supplies, staff shall recommend to City Council to trigger application of the Water Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, §10.18), as prescribed, to require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by Sections 10.18.070 through 10.18.090, as appropriate. Public Utilities Department SEWER 5.16-1 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future sanitary sewer system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval of the City Engineer to assist in determining the following: a. If the development/redevelopment does not discharge into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or does not increase flows or change points of discharge, then the property owner’s/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program. b. If the development/redevelopment discharges into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or increases flows or changes points of discharge, then the property Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-29 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as recommended by the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspections for the building/structure, whichever comes first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, as determined by the City Engineer, which may include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts for the sanitary sewer system, the property owner/developer shall submit a sanitary sewer system improvement phasing plan for the project to the City Engineer for review and approval which shall contain, at a minimum, a layout of the complete system, all facility sizes, including support calculations, construction phasing, and construction estimates. The study shall determine the impact of the project sewer flows for total build out of the project and identify local deficiencies for each project component each hotel). ELECTRICITY 5.17-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/develop shall consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Business and Community Programs Division, in order to review energy efficient measures to incorporate into the project design. Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner developer shall implement these energy efficient measures which may include the following: a. High-efficiency air-conditioning systems with EMS (computer) control b. Variable air volume (VAV) distribution c. Outside air (100%) economizer cycle d. Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads e. Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas f. Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors compressor motors, air- Public Utilities Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-30 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion handling units, and fan-coil units) g. Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces h. Use of compact fluorescent lamps i. Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps j. Use of light emitting diode (LED) or equivalent energy-efficient lighting for outdoor lighting k. Use of Energy Star® exit lighting or exit signage. l. Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified m. Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high-pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots n. Consideration of thermal energy storage air-conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods. o. For swimming pools and spas, incorporate solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors, as feasible. p. Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: a. New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $10,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems b. New Construction – cash incentives ($300 to $400 per kW reduction in load) for efficiency that exceeds Title 24 requirements c. Green Building Program – offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance. 5.17-2 Prior to final building and zoning inspection Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. Electrical Service Fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. Public Utilities Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-31 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.17-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent. Planning and Building Department 5.17-4 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with the Public Utilities Department to incorporate feasible renewable energy generation measures into the project. These measures may include but not be limited to use of solar and small wind turbine sources on new and existing facilities and the use of solar powered lighting in parking areas. Public Utilities Department STORM WATER 5.18-1 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map, or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to approval of a final subdivision map, or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following: a. If the specific development/redevelopment does not increase or redirect current or historic storm water quantities/flows, then the property owner/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to provide storm drainage facilities in 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency. b. If the specific development/redevelopment increases or redirects the current or historic storm water quantity/flow, then the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s office of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the storm drainage facilities as recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-32 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion Improvement (Fee) Program as determined by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage system improvement phasing plan for the project shall be submitted by the property owner/developer to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall contain, at a minimum, a layout of the complete system; all facility sizes, including support calculations; construction phasing; and, construction estimates. 5.18-2 Ongoing Ongoing, the City shall work with the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) to ensure that flood control facilities are well maintained and capable of accommodating, at a minimum, future 25-year storm flows for City-owned and maintained facilities, and 100-year storm flows for County facilities. Where improvements to local drainage facilities have the potential to increase discharges to County facilities, the City shall analyze potential impacts to County facilities in consultation with the Manager, County of Orange Flood Control Division. Encroachment Permits shall be obtained from the County’s Public Property Permits Section for any activity performed within OCFCD’s right of way. Public Works Department 5.18-3 Prior to the issuance of building permits Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City shall require that building plans indicate that new developments will minimize stormwater and urban runoff into drainage facilities by incorporating design features such as detention basins, on-site water features, and other strategies. Planning and Building Department OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES 5.19-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning Inspection Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning Inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as administered by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final building and zoning inspection, implementation of said plan shall commence and shall remain in full effect. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation include, but are not limited to: a. Detailing the location and design of on-site recycling facilities. b. Providing on-site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling. c. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for hazardous material disposal. Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-33 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion d. Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City. In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs, as required by the Public Works Department, including, but not limited to: a. Facilitating recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins. b. Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and storing. c. Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing adequate space for sorting and storing. d. Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection. e. Prohibiting curbside pick-up. 5.19-2 Ongoing during project operation Ongoing during project operation, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer: a. Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and packaging. b. Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard. c. Collection of office paper for recycling. d. Collection of (foam) cups for recycling. e. Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. Public Works Department 5.19-3 Prior to issuance of building permits Prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall show that trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works, Operations Division. On an ongoing basis, trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Public Works Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report R:\Projects\Anaheim\J050\FSEIR\FEIR-120612.docx 4-34 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Department Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5.19-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit, Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall demonstrate that the plans include provisions for the installation of trash and recycle receptacles near all benches and near high traffic areas such as plazas, transit stops and retail and dining establishments. Public Works Department 5.19-5 Prior to issuance of each grading and building permit Prior to issuance of each grading and building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit to the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager for approval a Construction Waste Management Plan that, at a minimum, specifies that at least 75 percent of non-hazardous construction and demolition debris shall be recycled or salvaged and identifies the materials to be diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or co-mingled. Planning and Building Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Errata Pages – December 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 11 ICU Analysis The City’s Growth Management Element requires a volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.90, or LOS D, as the lowest acceptable service level at intersections. Intersections that operate at a level of service below LOS D are deemed to be operating at insufficient levels. The City requires study area intersections to be evaluated through an intersection capacity utilization (ICU) analysis that compares forecast peak hour traffic volumes to intersection capacity. A minimum clearance interval of 0.05 in association with lane capacities of 1,700 vehicles per hour of green time for through and turn lanes was assumed for the ICU calculations. The City of Orange ICU analysis is consistent with the City of Anaheim analysis as are the LOS thresholds; therefore the same assumptions were applied for intersection in both jurisdictions. Table 2.1 presents the ICU level of service thresholds utilized in this traffic study. Table 2.1: Intersection Level of Service Thresholds LOS ICU A < 0.60 B 0.61 – 0.70 C 0.71 – 0.80 D 0.81 – 0.90 E 0.91 – 1.00 F > 1.00 Source: City of Anaheim, City of Orange Peak hour ICU and level of service (LOS) analyses were performed for 81 study intersections - 64 intersections in the City of Anaheim, 2 shared intersections between Anaheim and Orange, and 195 in the City of Orange. The City of Orange identified the preferred intersections for analysis within the City of Orange. For the Interim Year analysis, a transportation impact is considered significant in accordance with Table 2.2. For purposes of this calculation, the “Final V/C Ratio” refers to the future V/C ratio at an intersection with the proposed project but without any proposed mitigation. Mitigation measures sufficient to bring the level of service to a less than significant level are identified later in the report. Table 2.2: Significant Impact Criteria LOS Final V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C C >0.700 – 0.800 Equal to or greater than 0.050 D >0.800 – 0.900 Equal to or greater than 0.030 E, F > 0.900 Equal to or greater than 0.010 Source: City of Anaheim For General Plan Buildout analysis, a project is deemed to have a significant impact if the project results in deterioration of the LOS to an unacceptable LOS or an increase in the ICU value of 0.01 if the intersection is projected to operate at LOS E or F under without project conditions. Mitigation measures, discussed later in the report are required to bring deficient intersections and roadway segments to an acceptable LOS. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 15 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing conditions analysis establishes the framework for the future forecasts for the Proposed Project. The analysis is based on existing intersection and arterial segment traffic counts, collected by the City on a typical weekday in 2008 and included in the existing conditions analysis. The existing conditions analysis reflects these count volumes as well as existing lane configurations for all circulation system elements in the study area. Intersection Analysis Table 3.1 presents ICU and LOS results for the study intersections under existing conditions during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. Existing lane geometrics were assumed in the ICU and LOS analyses. The detailed existing ICU worksheets are presented in Appendix A-1. The following two intersections currently operate at unacceptable levels of service during the PM peak hour: • Euclid Street at Katella Avenue • Anaheim Boulevard at Ball Road Figure 3.1 presents study intersection LOS under existing conditions. A table summarizing the existing and future lane configurations is included in Appendix B. Table 3.1: Existing Peak Hour Intersection LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-1** Euclid Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.89 D 1.02 F I-2 Ninth Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.53 A 0.53 A I-3 Walnut Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.57 A 0.55 A I-4 Walnut Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.43 A 0.53 A I-5 Disneyland Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.68 B 0.76 C I-6 Disneyland Drive / West Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.53 A 0.57 A I-7 Harbor Boulevard / Vermont Avenue Anaheim 0.56 A 0.58 A I-8 Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.73 C 0.68 B I-9 Harbor Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.54 A 0.54 A I-10 Harbor Boulevard / I-5 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.32 A 0.34 A I-11 Harbor Boulevard / Disney Way Anaheim 0.33 A 0.42 A I-12 Harbor Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.55 A 0.63 B I-13 Harbor Boulevard / Convention Way Anaheim 0.29 A 0.35 A I-14 Harbor Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.55 A 0.57 A I-15 Clementine Street / Disney Way Anaheim 0.19 A 0.23 A I-16 Clementine Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.53 A 0.60 A I-17 I-5 Southbound Off-Ramp / Disney Way Anaheim* 0.20 A 0.24 A I-18 Anaheim Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.63 B 0.91 E I-19 Anaheim Boulevard / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.49 A 0.71 C I-20 Anaheim Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.44 A 0.59 A I-21 Anaheim Boulevard / Disney Way Anaheim* 0.44 A 0.49 A I-22 Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.47 A 0.58 A I-23 Haster Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 16 Table 3.1: Existing Peak Hour Intersection LOS, Continued ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-24 Haster Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.54 A 0.65 B I-25 Manchester Avenue (I-5 Southbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.55 A 0.52 A I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.46 A 0.50 A I-27 East Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.51 A 0.67 B I-28 Lewis Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.41 A 0.53 A I-29 Lewis Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.28 A 0.31 A I-30 Lewis Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.48 A 0.62 B I-31 Lewis Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-32 I-5 HOV Ramps / Gene Autry Way Anaheim* 0.07 A 0.07 A I-33 Lewis Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.53 A 0.48 A I-34 Manchester Avenue / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.52 A 0.37 A I-35 Anaheim Way / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.36 A 0.50 A I-36 State College Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.57 A 0.65 B I-37 State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.43 A 0.53 A I-38 State College Boulevard / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.30 A 0.29 A I-39 State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim/Orange 0.46 A 0.47 A I-40 State College Boulevard / Orange Center Drive Anaheim/Orange 0.21 A 0.21 A I-41 State College Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.33 A 0.28 A I-42 State College Boulevard / I-5 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.43 A 0.28 A I-43 State College Boulevard / The City Drive / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.71 C 0.66 B I-44 Sunkist Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.82 D 0.79 C I-45 Howell Avenue / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.38 A 0.55 A I-46 Rampart Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.51 A 0.44 A I-47 Rampart Street / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.31 A 0.31 A I-48 Ball Road / SR-57 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.54 A 0.58 A I-49 Ball Road / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.69 B 0.57 A I-50 SR-57 Northbound Ramps / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.36 A 0.40 A I-51 SR-57 Southbound Ramps / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.40 A 0.40 A I-52 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.52 A 0.49 A I-53 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.61 B 0.68 B I-54 Phoenix Club Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.48 A 0.59 A I-55 Douglass Road / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.41 A 0.49 A I-56 Eckhoff Street / Orangewood Avenue Orange 0.56 A 0.69 B I-57 Main Street / Taft Avenue Orange 0.68 B 0.73 C I-58 Main Street / Katella Avenue Orange 0.50 A 0.50 A I-59 Batavia Street / Taft Avenue Orange 0.65 B 0.67 B I-60 Clementine Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-61 Clementine Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.33 A 0.33 A I-62 Flower Street / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.38 A 0.49 A I-63 Harbor Boulevard / Chapman Avenue Anaheim 0.55 A 0.61 B I-64 I-5 Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.43 A 0.46 A I-65 SR-57 Northbound Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.40 A 0.39 A I-66 SR-57 Southbound Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.54 A 0.52 A I-67 Euclid Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.59 A 0.66 B I-68 Walnut Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.56 A 0.47 A I-69 Disneyland Drive / I-5 Southbound Off-Ramp Anaheim* 0.35 A 0.29 A I-70 Disneyland Drive/ Magic Way Anaheim 0.28 A 0.30 A I-71 Ox Road / Cast Place / Ball Road Anaheim 0.56 A 0.55 A I-72 Convention Center/ Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.39 A 0.41 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 17 Table 3.1: Existing Peak Hour Intersection LOS, Continued ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-73 Harbor Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.61 B 0.76 C I-74 Harbor Boulevard / Broadway Anaheim 0.50 A 0.67 B I-75 Harbor Boulevard / Manchester Avenue Anaheim 0.29 A 0.43 A I-76 Anaheim Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.47 A 0.60 A I-77 Anaheim Boulevard / Broadway Anaheim 0.46 A 0.52 A I-78 Olive Street / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.40 A 0.43 A I-79 Flore Street / West Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.53 A 0.47 A I-80 West Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.61 B 0.72 C I-81 Struck Avenue / Katella Avenue Orange 0.28 A 0.34 A Source: City of Anaheim Note: *Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction * The intersection of Euclid Street / Katella Avenue is currently under construction to enhance capacity. The intersection of Euclid Street / Katella Avenue is currently under construction to enhance capacity. Daily Arterial Segment LOS Analysis Table 3.2 presents average daily traffic (ADT) and LOS for study area arterial segments under existing conditions. The analysis is based on existing traffic counts, collected by the City on a typical weekday in 2008 and 2009. The table indicates that four arterial segments operate at a deficient LOS under Existing condition. Three of these segments currently are not at their ultimate configuration per the City’s Circulation Element. One deficient segment that is currently at the Circulation Element configuration is further analyzed under AM and PM peak hour conditions. The deficient segments are: • Ball Road between State College Boulevard and Sunkist Street • Ball Road between Sunkist Street and SR-57 (Ultimate configuration) • Orangewood Avenue between State College Boulevard and Rampart Street • Orangewood Avenue between Rampart Street and SR-57 Table 3.2: Existing Daily Arterial Segment LOS ID Arterial From To Jurisdiction 2008 Existing Daily Count Mid-Block Lanes Total Capacity V-C Ratio Daily LOS A-1 Anaheim Boulevard Katella Avenue I-5 Freeway Anaheim 19,380 6D 56,300 0.34 A A-2 Anaheim Boulevard I-5 Freeway Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 33,160 6D 56,300 0.59 A A-3 Anaheim Boulevard Cerritos Avenue Ball Road Anaheim 26,790 4D 37,500 0.71 C A-4 Ball Road Euclid Street Walnut Street Anaheim 26,330 6D 56,300 0.47 A A-5 Ball Road Walnut Street Disneyland Drive Anaheim 34,020 6D 56,300 0.60 A A-6 Ball Road Disneyland Drive Harbor Boulevard Anaheim 44,320 6D 56,300 0.79 C A-7 Ball Road Harbor Boulevard Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim 36,890 6D 56,300 0.66 B A-8 Ball Road Anaheim Boulevard East Street Anaheim 35,280 6D 56,300 0.63 B A-9 Ball Road East Street State College Boulevard Anaheim 38,110 6D 56,300 0.68 B A-10 Ball Road State College Boulevard Sunkist Street Anaheim 40,500 4D 37,500 1.08 F A-11 Ball Road Sunkist Street SR-57 Freeway Anaheim 48,400 6D 56,300 0.86 D A-12 Ball Road SR-57 Freeway Main Street Orange 32,740 6D 56,300 0.58 A A-13 Clementine Street Manchester Avenue Disney Way Anaheim 7,510 4U 25,000 0.30 A A-14 Clementine Street Disney Way Katella Avenue Anaheim 7,510 4U 25,000 0.30 A A-20 Disney Way Harbor Boulevard Clementine Street Anaheim 7,770 6D 56,300 0.14 A A-21 Disney Way Clementine Street Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim 13,880 6D 56,300 0.25 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 27 Table 4.1: Interim Year 2015 No Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-1 Euclid Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.66 B 0.75 C I-2 Ninth Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.66 B 0.65 B I-3 Walnut Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.61 B 0.62 B I-4 Walnut Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.58 A 0.63 B I-5 Disneyland Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.74 C 0.81 D I-6 Disneyland Drive / West Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.66 B 0.68 B I-7 Harbor Boulevard / Vermont Avenue Anaheim 0.68 B 0.71 C I-8 Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.83 D 0.73 C I-9 Harbor Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.60 A 0.61 B I-10 Harbor Boulevard / I-5 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.40 A 0.37 A I-11 Harbor Boulevard / Disney Way Anaheim 0.36 A 0.55 A I-12 Harbor Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.66 B 0.71 C I-13 Harbor Boulevard / Convention Way Anaheim 0.43 A 0.47 A I-14 Harbor Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.64 B 0.66 B I-15 Clementine Street / Disney Way Anaheim 0.29 A 0.30 A I-16 Clementine Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.62 B 0.72 C I-17 I-5 Southbound Off-Ramp / Disney Way Anaheim* 0.27 A 0.29 A I-18 Anaheim Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.72 C 0.98 E I-19 Anaheim Boulevard / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.70 B 0.85 D I-20 Anaheim Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.51 A 0.70 B I-21 Anaheim Boulevard / Disney Way Anaheim* 0.51 A 0.60 A I-22 Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.59 A 0.71 C I-23 Haster Street/Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.35 A 0.44 A I-24 Haster Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.66 B 0.79 C I-25 Manchester Avenue (I-5 Southbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.72 C 0.63 B I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.55 A 0.61 B I-27 East Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.59 A 0.79 C I-28 Lewis Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.60 A 0.70 B I-29 Lewis Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.45 A 0.48 A I-30 Lewis Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.75 C 0.98 E I-31 Lewis Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-32 I-5 HOV Ramps / Gene Autry Way Anaheim* 0.22 A 0.28 A I-33 Lewis Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.56 A 0.51 A I-34 Manchester Avenue / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.58 A 0.50 A I-35 Anaheim Way / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.47 A 0.54 A I-36 State College Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.66 B 0.75 C I-37 State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.52 A 0.66 B I-38 State College Boulevard / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.57 A 0.62 B I-39 State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim/Orange 0.58 A 0.61 B I-40 State College Boulevard / Orange Center Drive Anaheim/Orange 0.36 A 0.32 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 28 Table 4.1: Interim Year 2015 No Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS, Continued ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-41 State College Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.47 A 0.42 A I-42 State College Boulevard / I-5 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.59 A 0.44 A I-43 State College Boulevard / The City Drive / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.76 C 0.70 B I-44 Sunkist Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.85 D 0.91 E I-45 Howell Avenue / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.46 A 0.66 B I-46 Rampart Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.65 B 0.75 C I-47 Rampart Street / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.42 A 0.46 A I-48 Ball Road / SR-57 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.62 B 0.67 B I-49 Ball Road / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.76 C 0.68 B I-50 SR-57 Northbound Ramps / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.46 A 0.51 A I-51 SR-57 Southbound Ramps / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.48 A 0.48 A I-52 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.60 A 0.58 A I-53 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.69 B 0.78 C I-54 Phoenix Club Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.66 B 0.78 C I-55 Douglass Road / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.67 B 0.78 C I-56 Eckhoff Street / Orangewood Avenue Orange 0.76 C 0.80 C I-57 Main Street / Taft Avenue Orange 0.76 C 0.96 E I-58 Main Street / Katella Avenue Orange 0.60 A 0.60 A I-59 Batavia Street / Taft Avenue Orange 0.79 C 0.78 C I-60 Clementine Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable I-61 Clementine Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.36 A 0.54 A I-62 Flower Street / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.44 A 0.59 A I-63 Harbor Boulevard / Chapman Avenue Anaheim 0.59 A 0.67 B I-64 I-5 Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.44 A 0.51 A I-65 SR-57 Northbound Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.44 A 0.43 A I-66 SR-57 Southbound Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.60 A 0.62 B I-67 Euclid Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.64 B 0.70 B I-68 Walnut Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.61 B 0.48 A I-69 Disneyland Drive / I-5 Southbound Off-Ramp Anaheim* 0.41 A 0.35 A I-70 Disneyland Drive/ Magic Way Anaheim 0.35 A 0.35 A I-71 Ox Road / Cast Place / Ball Road Anaheim 0.62 B 0.59 A I-72 Convention Center/ Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.51 A 0.52 A I-73 Harbor Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.66 B 0.82 D I-74 Harbor Boulevard / Broadway Anaheim 0.54 A 0.72 C I-75 Harbor Boulevard / Manchester Avenue Anaheim 0.33 A 0.47 A I-76 Anaheim Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.56 A 0.68 B I-77 Anaheim Boulevard / Broadway Anaheim 0.54 A 0.56 A I-78 Olive Street / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.45 A 0.48 A I-79 Flore Street / West Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.56 A 0.49 A I-80 West Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.72 C 0.83 D I-81 Struck Avenue / Katella Avenue Orange 0.40 A 0.49 A Note: * Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 53 • State College Boulevard/The City Drive at Chapman Avenue (Orange) • Howell Avenue at Katella Avenue • Rampart Street at Orangewood Avenue • Orangewood Avenue at SR-57 Southbound Ramps (Orange) • Douglass Road at Katella Avenue Table 5.1: 2030 No Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-1 Euclid Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.85 D 0.92 E I-2 Ninth Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.93 E 0.95 E I-3 Walnut Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.71 C 0.70 B I-4 Walnut Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.87 D 0.86 D I-5 Disneyland Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.87 D 0.90 D I-6 Disneyland Drive / West Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.92 E 0.92 E I-7 Harbor Boulevard / Vermont Avenue Anaheim 0.75 C 0.77 C I-8 Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 1.05 F 0.93 E I-9 Harbor Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.74 C 0.77 C I-10 Harbor Boulevard / I-5 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.58 A 0.49 A I-11 Harbor Boulevard / Disney Way Anaheim 0.45 A 0.82 D I-12 Harbor Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.79 C 0.87 D I-13 Harbor Boulevard / Convention Way Anaheim 0.59 A 0.76 C I-14 Harbor Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.82 D 0.86 D I-15 Clementine Street / Disney Way Anaheim 0.55 A 0.56 A I-16 Clementine Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.65 B 0.88 D I-17 I-5 Southbound Off-Ramp / Disney Way Anaheim* 0.48 A 0.50 A I-18 Anaheim Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.88 D 0.99 E I-19 Anaheim Boulevard / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.86 D 1.05 F I-20 Anaheim Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.66 B 0.92 E I-21 Anaheim Boulevard / Disney Way Anaheim* 0.68 B 0.83 D I-22 Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.88 D 0.89 D I-23 Haster Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.91 E 1.10 F I-24 Haster Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.74 C 0.82 D I-25 Manchester Avenue (I-5 Southbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.75 C 0.78 C I-26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.96 E 0.85 D I-27 East Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.84 D 0.80 C I-28 Lewis Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.77 C 0.89 D I-29 Lewis Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.85 D 0.91 E I-30 Lewis Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.84 D 1.28 F I-31 Lewis Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.63 B 0.79 C I-32 I-5 HOV Ramps / Gene Autry Way Anaheim* 0.54 A 0.73 C I-33 Lewis Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.63 B 0.56 A I-34 Manchester Avenue / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.73 C 0.80 C I-35 Anaheim Way / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.72 C 0.62 B I-36 State College Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.73 C 0.90 D I-37 State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.86 D 0.98 E I-38 State College Boulevard / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.98 E 0.84 D I-39 State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim/ Orange 0.89 D 0.97 E I-40 State College Boulevard / Orange Center Drive Anaheim/ Orange 0.71 C 0.58 A ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 54 Table 5.1: 2030 No Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS, Continued ID Intersection Jurisdiction AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS I-41 State College Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.77 C 0.73 C I-42 State College Boulevard / I-5 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.91 E 0.78 C I-43 State College Boulevard / The City Drive / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.86 D 0.92 E I-44 Sunkist Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.85 D 0.87 D I-45 Howell Avenue / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.62 B 0.91 E I-46 Rampart Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.73 C 1.05 F I-47 Rampart Street / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.66 B 0.83 D I-48 Ball Road / SR-57 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.69 B 0.72 C I-49 Ball Road / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.82 D 0.86 D I-50 SR-57 Northbound Ramps / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.67 B 0.73 C I-51 SR-57 Southbound Ramps / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.70 B 0.69 B I-52 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Northbound Ramps Orange* 0.76 C 0.79 C I-53 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.85 D 0.99 E I-54 Phoenix Club Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.81 D 0.87 D I-55 Douglass Road / Katella Avenue Anaheim 1.02 F 1.09 F I-56 Eckhoff Street / Orangewood Avenue Orange 0.88 D 0.85 D I-57 Main Street / Taft Avenue Orange 0.67 B 0.87 D I-58 Main Street / Katella Avenue Orange 0.77 C 0.78 C I-59 Batavia Street / Taft Avenue Orange 0.83 D 0.86 D I-60 Clementine Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.53 A 0.83 D I-61 Clementine Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.54 A 0.76 C I-62 Flower Street / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.56 A 0.80 C I-63 Harbor Boulevard / Chapman Avenue Anaheim 0.67 B 0.81 D I-64 I-5 Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.60 A 0.73 C I-65 SR-57 Northbound Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.50 A 0.53 A I-66 SR-57 Southbound Ramps / Chapman Avenue Orange* 0.73 C 0.82 D I-67 Euclid Street / Ball Road Anaheim 0.74 C 0.79 C I-68 Walnut Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.73 C 0.53 A I-69 Disneyland Drive / I-5 Southbound Off-Ramp Anaheim* 0.55 A 0.49 A I-70 Disneyland Drive/ Magic Way Anaheim 0.50 A 0.46 A I-71 Ox Road / Cast Place / Ball Road Anaheim 0.74 C 0.68 B I-72 Convention Center/ Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.59 A 0.58 A I-73 Harbor Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.69 B 0.81 D I-74 Harbor Boulevard / Broadway Anaheim 0.58 A 0.71 C I-75 Harbor Boulevard / Manchester Avenue Anaheim 0.41 A 0.57 A I-76 Anaheim Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.75 C 0.85 D I-77 Anaheim Boulevard / Broadway Anaheim 0.70 B 0.67 B I-78 Olive Street / Lincoln Avenue Anaheim 0.45 A 0.49 A I-79 Flore Street / West Place / Ball Road Anaheim 0.63 B 0.50 A I-80 West Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.63 B 0.65 B I-81 Struck Avenue / Katella Avenue Orange 0.67 B 0.80 C Note: *Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 85 6.2 2030 ANALYSIS IMPACTS Project impacts for the 2030 buildout scenario are determined using the definition of significant impacts from the City of Anaheim’s Growth Management Element in the General Plan, discussed in Chapter 2.0, that states that LOS E or LOS F is unacceptable. Intersections According to the analysis, there are 21 intersections with project related impacts associated with the Proposed Project. The intersections with project impacts are presented in Table 6.5. Table 6.5: 2030 Project Related Intersection Impacts ID Intersection Jurisdiction Existing Conditions 2030 No Project 2030 With Project AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I – 1 Euclid Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.89 D 1.02 F 0.85 D 0.92 E 0.87 D 0.94 E I – 2 Ninth Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.53 A 0.53 A 0.93 E 0.95 E 0.95 E 0.97 E I – 5 Disneyland Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.68 B 0.76 C 0.87 D 0.90 D 0.87 D 0.92 E I – 6 Disneyland Drive / West Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.53 A 0.57 A 0.92 E 0.92 E 0.96 E 0.94 E I – 8 Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.73 C 0.68 B 1.05 F 0.93 E 1.10 F 0.96 E I - 18 Anaheim Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.63 B 0.91 E 0.88 D 0.99 E 0.88 D 1.01 F I - 19 Anaheim Boulevard / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.49 A 0.71 C 0.86 D 1.05 F 0.86 D 1.03 F I - 20 Anaheim Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.44 A 0.59 A 0.66 B 0.92 E 0.66 B 0.95 E I – 22 Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.47 A 0.58 A 0.88 D 0.89 D 0.90 D 0.92 E I – 23 Haster Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Not Applicable 0.91 E 1.10 F 0.97 E 1.17 F I - 26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.46 A 0.50 A 0.96 E 0.85 D 0.95 E 0.90 D I – 29 Lewis Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.28 A 0.31 A 0.85 D 0.91 E 0.85 D 0.95 E I – 30 Lewis Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.48 A 0.62 B 0.84 D 1.28 F 0.85 D 1.28 F I – 37 State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.43 A 0.53 A 0.86 D 0.98 E 0.94 E 0.99 E I - 38 State College Boulevard / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.30 A 0.29 A 0.98 E 0.84 D 1.02 F 0.84 D I – 39 State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim/ Orange 0.46 A 0.47 A 0.89 D 0.97 E 0.91 E 0.97 E I – 43 State College Boulevard / The City Drive / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.71 C 0.66 B 0.86 D 0.92 E 0.88 D 0.96 E I – 45 Howell Avenue / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.38 A 0.55 A 0.62 B 0.91 E 0.62 B 0.95 E I – 46 Rampart Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.51 A 0.44 A 0.73 C 1.05 F 0.78 C 1.13 F I – 53 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.61 B 0.68 B 0.85 D 0.99 E 0.84 D 1.04 F I – 55 Douglass Road / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.41 A 0.49 A 1.02 F 1.09 F 1.04 F 1.09 F Note: *Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction Arterial Segments Based on the arterial segment traffic analysis, there is one arterial segment with a significant impact with implementation of the Proposed Project within the City of Anaheim. Table 6.6 displays the deficient arterial segment in Anaheim. This arterial segment will require mitigation to operate at an acceptable LOS through upgrading segment classification to provide additional capacity. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 92 2030 Analysis In summary, throughout the study area 21 intersections are forecast to operate at a deficient LOS under 2030 With Project conditions. Included in the 21 intersections are three Caltrans ramp termini intersections. As a general rule, mitigation measures for arterials or intersections begin with identification of any measures that might have been recommended as part of other traffic studies in the area, particularly those contained in the traffic study prepared for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project (DSEIR No. 339). These mitigation measures are then applied to determine whether they result in roadway segment or intersection operation within acceptable thresholds. If mitigation measures were not previously identified either as part of a traffic study or planned future improvements, mitigation is achieved by identifying new improvements that will provide adequate capacity for the critical movement for an intersection or for arterial segments. Critical movements are conflicting intersection turning movements that are identified to have the highest ICU for opposing movements; i.e. each of the approaches at a four-legged intersection will contain a critical movement that conflicts with an opposing movement. Since the combination of the ICU values for each critical movement defines the ICU, providing additional through lanes or turning lanes is dependent upon whether the critical movement is a through or turn (left or right) movement. The decision of whether additional lanes should be auxiliary lanes that just add capacity to the intersection without widening the street segment or extended to adjacent intersections is dependent upon the performance, proximity and improvement needs of adjacent intersections. Mitigation measures are further analyzed for feasibility. A preliminary feasibility assessment is reliant upon potential cost-effectiveness and right-of-way acquisition. Right-of-way acquisitions are least preferred as they incur relocation and compensation cost for displaced residences and businesses which are additional burdens to the community, hence wherever feasible additional capacity for through movements or turn movements are facilitated through re-striping or widening, provided the intersection has sufficient receiving lanes as vehicles pass through the intersection. Table 7.2 provides a list of improvements for the deficient intersections within the Cities of Anaheim and Orange. Improvement strategies for locations within the City of Orange will require coordination with the City and a fair-share contribution determined for the City of Anaheim’s share of the cost of the improvements in Orange. Figure 7.1 shows the improvement locations and identified mitigation strategy. Lane geometries for the intersections within the study area including mitigation strategies are included in Appendix B. Table 7.2: Recommended 2030 Intersection Mitigation Strategies ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project Scenario Without Mitigation 2030 With Project Scenario With Mitigation Recommended Mitigation Strategy AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I - 1 Euclid Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.87 D 0.94 E 0.87 D 0.89 D Restripe NBR to NBTR, add 400’ NB departure lane (widen) I - 2 Ninth Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.95 E 0.97 E 0.88 D 0.80 C Add 2nd NBL (Restripe #1 SB lane) I - 5 Disneyland Drive / Ball Road Anaheim 0.87 D 0.92 E 0.83 D 0.87 D Restripe NB to 2L, 2T, 1R and SB to 2L, 2T. Add NBL: Remove Split Phase I - 6 Disneyland Drive / West Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.96 E 0.94 E 0.85 D 0.90 D Restripe EBR to EBT, Restripe WBR to WBT and add 4th WB lane to the Simba parking lot entrance ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 93 Table 7.2: Recommended 2030 Intersection Mitigation Strategies, Continued ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project Scenario Without Mitigation 2030 With Project Scenario With Mitigation Recommended Mitigation Strategy AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I - 8 Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 1.10 F 0.96 E 0.90 D 0.90 D Add NBT, SBT, EBT, EBR I - 18 Anaheim Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim 0.88 D 1.01 F 0.82 D 0.90 D Add NBR, EBL, EBR I - 19 Anaheim Boulevard / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.86 D 1.03 F 0.68 B 0.86 D Add NBL, SBL, WBR, Restripe WB approach to 2L, 1TR, 1R I - 20 Anaheim Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps Anaheim* 0.66 B 0.95 E 0.55 A 0.85 D Add SBT (in median) I – 22 Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.90 D 0.92 E 0.90 D 0.90 D Add WBR I – 23 Haster Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 0.97 E 1.17 F 0.78 C 0.88 D Add WBL, SBL, SBR I - 26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim* 0.95 E 0.90 D 0.82 D 0.78 C Add EBT, WBT I – 29 Lewis Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 0.85 D 0.95 E 0.85 D 0.89 D Add WBR I – 30 Lewis Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.85 D 1.28 F 0.70 B 0.83 D Add NBL, NBT, SBL, SBR, WBT; Restripe SB to 2L, 1T, 1TR, 1R I – 37 State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.94 E 0.99 E 0.90 D 0.85 D Add WBR, EBR; Restripe SB to 2L, 2T, 2R; EB to 3L, 3T, 1R I - 38 State College Boulevard / Gene Autry Way Anaheim 1.02 F 0.84 D 0.90 D 0.73 C Add SBR I – 39 State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim/ Orange 0.91 E 0.97 E 0.88 D 0.90 D Add NBR and WBT I – 43 State College Boulevard / The City Drive / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.88 D 0.96 E 0.83 D 0.80 C Restripe WBT to WBTR I – 45 Howell Avenue / Katella Avenue Anaheim 0.62 B 0.95 E 0.62 B 0.85 D Add WBR I – 46 Rampart Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim 0.78 C 1.13 F 0.73 C 0.80 C Add NB Free Right, Add SBL I – 53 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.84 D 1.04 F 0.79 C 0.89 D Add WBL (Restripe) I – 55 Douglass Road / Katella Avenue Anaheim 1.04 F 1.09 F 0.84 D 0.87 D Add NBT and SBT; Reconfigure NBTR to NBT, Reconfigure SBTR to SBT; Add EBT and WBT Note: *Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction 7.3 ARTERIAL SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS 2015 Interim Year Analysis Based on the 2015 With Project traffic analysis, five arterial segments along Katella Avenue will need to be improved through upgrading segment classification to the buildout condition to operate at an acceptable LOS. Table 7.3 presents the daily V/C ratio and proposed improvement. For the proposed improvement, Katella Avenue between Disneyland Drive and Manchester Avenue will be widened from six to eight lanes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 97 7.5 CITY OF ORANGE IMPROVEMENTS 2015 Interim Year Analysis As identified in the 2015 traffic analysis, there are no intersections in the City of Orange that are significantly impacted by implementation of the proposed project. 2030 Analysis As set forth above in Table 7.6, the proposed project results in cumulative impacts to three intersections located within the City of Orange or shared intersections between Orange and Anaheim. The identified improvements are not included within the City of Orange development impact fee program. For this study, the fair-share calculations show that the Proposed Project contributes 4% to 14% of trips to Orange intersections. The Cities of Orange and Anaheim will need to enter into a cooperative agreement to determine the implementation of these improvements. The City of Anaheim does not have jurisdiction over the deficient circulation system components in the City of Orange. Nevertheless, the City shall fund appropriate fair-shares of the identified improvements. The City shall endeavor to work with the City of Orange in developing a joint fee program whereby cross-municipal boundary impacts can be mitigated by development that is occurring in the adjoining jurisdiction. However, because the City of Anaheim cannot guarantee that the City of Orange will cooperate in the development of such a fee program or utilize funds collected by the City of Anaheim for City of Orange impacts for the intended purpose of such funds, a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be developed for the deficient City of Orange intersections in the Environmental Documentation. Table 7.6: Potential 2030 Intersection Mitigation and Fair-share for Orange Facilities ID Intersection Jurisdiction 2030 With Project 2030 With Project (Mitigated) Proposed Mitigation Strategy Possible Mitigation Issues Fair-Share Percentage AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS I - 39 State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim/ Orange 0.91 E 0.97 E 0.88 D 0.90 D Add NBR and WBT Median, Corner business 4% I - 43 State College Boulevard / The City Drive / Chapman Avenue Orange 0.88 D 0.96 E 0.83 D 0.80 C Restripe WBT to WBTR Within ROW 14% I - 53 Orangewood Avenue / SR- 57 Southbound Ramps Orange* 0.84 D 1.04 F 0.79 C 0.89 D Add WBL (Restripe) Within ROW 11% Note: *Iintersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction For ramp termini intersections within the City of Orange, the facilities identified in Table 7.7 would require improvements to ensure acceptable operations. However, as the City of Orange did not utilize the HCM methodology in their General Plan, the operational deficiencies described above were not addressed. As these locations operate at an acceptable LOS under the ICU analysis, they should be monitored to determine appropriate strategies toward improving flow through signal timing and coordination. The City of Anaheim does not have jurisdiction over the deficient circulation system components in the City of Orange, thus a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be developed for the deficient Orange locations in the Environmental Documentation. Should the City of Orange decide to improve ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report 110 Table 7.9: Project Mitigation Strategies ID Location Jurisdiction Impact Mitigation Strategy Comments Intersections I - 1 Euclid Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim Project Restripe NBR to NBTR, add 400’ NB departure lane (widen) Infeasible I - 2 Ninth Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim Project Add 2nd NBL (Restripe #1 SB lane) I - 5 Disneyland Drive / Ball Road Anaheim Project Add NBL: Restripe NB to 2L, 2T, 1R and SB to 2L, 2T; Remove Split Phase Infeasible I - 6 Disneyland Drive / West Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim Project Restripe EBR to EBT, Restripe WBR to WBT and add 4th WB lane to the Simba parking lot entrance Infeasible I - 8 Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road Anaheim Project Add NBT, SBT, EBT, EBR Infeasible I - 18 Anaheim Boulevard / Ball Road* Anaheim Project Add NBR, EBL, EBR I - 19 Anaheim Boulevard / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim Project Add NBL, SBL, WBR, Restripe WB approach to 2L, 1TR, 1R I - 20 Anaheim Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps AnaheimA Project Add SBT (in median) I - 22 Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street / Katella Avenue Anaheim Project Add WBR Infeasible I - 23 Haster Street / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Project Add WBL, SBL, SBR I - 26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue AnaheimA Project Add EBT, WBT I - 29 Lewis Street / Cerritos Avenue Anaheim Project Add WBR I - 30 Lewis Street / Katella Avenue* Anaheim Project Add NBL, NBT, SBL, SBR, WBT; Restripe SB to 2L, 1T, 1TR, 1R I - 37 State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue** Anaheim Project Add WBR, EBR; Restripe SB to 2L, 2T, 2R; EB to 3L, 3T, 1R Partial Infeasible I - 38 State College Boulevard / Gene Autry Way Anaheim Project Add SBR I - 39 State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim/ Orange Project Add NBR and WBT Infeasible I - 43 State College Boulevard / The City Drive / Chapman Avenue Orange Project Restripe WBT to WBTR Outside City’s Jurisdiction I - 45 Howell Avenue / Katella Avenue Anaheim Project Add WBR I - 46 Rampart Street / Orangewood Avenue Anaheim Project Add NB Free Right, Add SBL I - 53 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Southbound Ramps Orange Project Add WBL (Restripe) Outside City’s Jurisdiction I - 55 Douglass Road / Katella Avenue AnaheimA Project Add NBT and SBT; Reconfigure NBTR to NBT, Reconfigure SBTR to SBT; Add EBT and WBT Arterial Segments A-35 Katella Avenue between Disneyland Drive and Hotel Way*** Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8-lane arterial A-36 Katella Avenue between Hotel Way and Harbor Boulevard*** Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8-lane arterial A-37 Katella Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Clementine St Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8-lane arterial A-38 Katella Avenue between Clementine Street and Anaheim Boulevard*** Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8-lane arterial A-39 Katella Avenue between Anaheim Boulevard and Manchester Avenue*** Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8-lane arterial A-40a Katella Avenue between Manchester Avenue and Anaheim Way Anaheim Project Upgrade to 8-lane Stadium Ramp Termini Intersections I - 20 Anaheim Boulevard / I-5 Northbound Ramps**** Anaheim Project Add 4th SBT I - 25 Manchester Avenue (I-5 Southbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue Anaheim Project Add 4th EBT, Add 5th WBT I - 26 Anaheim Way (I-5 Northbound Ramps) / Katella Avenue**** Anaheim Project Add 4th EBT, Add 5th WBT I - 53 Orangewood Avenue / SR-57 Southbound Ramps**** Orange Project Add WBL (Restripe) Outside City’s Jurisdiction * Intersection deficient in 2015 but no project related significant impact. The improvements from 2030 should be expedited to 2015 at these locations for the intersection to operate at an acceptable LOS in 2015 with the exception of the improvement at Katella Avenue and Lewis Street, which is infeasible in 2015. Override recommended for restriping one EBT to EBL only Arterial Segment deficient in 2015 Intersection identified as deficient under both ICU and HCM analysis. A Intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix B Water Demand Memorandum – July 2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Mr. Al Shaikh, P.E. Principal Civil Engineer City of Anaheim 201 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 601 Anaheim, CA 92805 Subject: Consideration of the City of Anaheim’s Resort Specific Plan on Current and Projected Water Demands Dear Mr. Shaikh: The purpose of this memorandum is to document the consistency of the conclusions regarding water supply reliability presented in the City of Anaheim’s (Anaheim) Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) Water Supply Assessment (WSA), prepared in November 2009 and supplemented with a Water Demand and Regional Supply Update memo dated November 29, 2010 as part of the ARSP Environmental Impact Report, and Anaheim’s 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (2010 UWMP), adopted by the Anaheim City Council in June 2011. The findings of this analysis include the following:  The projected demands detailed in the 2010 UWMP include: Anaheim’s estimated water demands for existing customers; and projected water demands associated with the development projects identified as part of the ARSP WSA.  The 2010 UWMP demonstrates that the projected water supplies available to Anaheim through 2035 are sufficient to meet the existing and projected water demands, including those demands associated with the proposed developments identified in the ARSP WSA. ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 8001 Irvine Center Drive Suite 1100 Irvine California 92618 Tel [PHONE REDACTED] Fax [PHONE REDACTED] www.arcadis-us.com Date: July 21, 2011 Contact: Michael B. Hurley Phone: (213) 270-5305 Email: mhurley@arcadis- us.com ---PAGE BREAK--- Mr. Al Shaikh, P.E. July 21, 2011 Page: 2/4 ARSP WSA Projected Demands The ARSP project area is divided into two development areas: the Commercial-Recreation District (CR District), and the Public- Recreation District (PR District). Presently, the development within the 581 acres of the project area consists of the Anaheim Convention Center and a mix of hotels, retail stores, restaurants, and other visitor- serving uses. There are also small industrial and office uses, mobile home parks, an elementary school, as well as land used for agricultural purposes. The projected water demands associated with the existing development was included in the projected Total City Demands identified in the ARSP WSA. The proposed project within the ARSP project area discussed in the WSA included the build-out of development within the CR District, and the expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center within the PR District. The total projected water demand associated with the proposed increase in land use intensification within the ARSP project area was 981.7 acre-feet (AF) per year (see November 29, 2010, Water Demand and Regional Supply Update memo). UWMP Projected Demands and Supplies Over the last year, Anaheim has updated its 2010 UWMP. The 2010 UWMP documents the City’s: estimated current and projected water demands through 2035; and projected water supplies available to Anaheim to meet these projected demands. A key consideration in the development of future water demand projections was population growth within the service area. The 2010 UWMP projects that Anaheim’s population will increase from 364,921 currently to 432,949 in 2035, with much of the growth attributed to higher population densities throughout Anaheim. The anticipated higher population densities are attributed to development projects including the Platinum Triangle and Mountain Park, as well as various other development and redevelopment projects. As a result, the 2010 UWMP projects that Anaheim’s water demand will increase from 66,929 in 2010 to 77,700 in 2035. ---PAGE BREAK--- Mr. Al Shaikh, P.E. July 21, 2011 Page: 3/4 The current and projected water demands identified in the 2010 UWMP are significantly less than the demands projected for Anaheim as part of the ARSP WSA. For FY 2009-10, the total water demand for retail customers served by Anaheim was approximately 67,000 AF annually or 10,000 AF less than the 77,770 AF projected for 2010 in the ARSP WSA. As noted above, Anaheim is now not projected to meet that level of demand until 2035. There are a number of factors contributing to this lower level of consumption including cooler weather, the economy, and conservation efforts in response to the recent drought and regulatory restrictions on imported water supplies. It is recognized that perhaps not all of the current conservation within Anaheim is “permanent” and is due in some measure to implementation of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California’s (Metropolitan) Water Shortage Allocation Plan, which went into effect in 2009. However, it is highly likely that a significant portion of this conservation will become permanent as hardware such as low and ultra-low flush toilets has been installed, landscape has been altered and irrigation systems retrofitted. Lifestyles have also been altered due to the heightened awareness to conserve water as well. Therefore, the demand projections included in the WSA should now be considered conservative, making the conclusion of a reliable water supply even more positive. This conclusion is reflected in the 2010 UWMP, which projects that Anaheim will have sufficient water supplies from local groundwater, imported water purchased from Metropolitan, and future recycled water supplies to meet projected water demands through 2035, including those associated with the proposed projects included in the ARSP WSA. Current and projected water demands and supply sources identified in the 2010 UWMP are provided below. ---PAGE BREAK--- Mr. Al Shaikh, P.E. July 21, 2011 Page: 4/4 2010 UWMP Current and Projected Water Supplies and Demands (AFY) Fiscal Year Ending 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Projected Demands 66,929 72,400 73,600 75,900 77,500 77,700 Groundwater 44,898 46,917 47,674 49,169 50,209 50,339 Recycled Water 220 255 255 255 255 Metropolitan 22,031 25,263 25,671 26,476 27,036 27,106 Total Supplies 66,929 72,400 73,600 75,900 77,500 77,700 Consistency of 2010 UWMP and ARSP WSA Conclusions The 2010 UWMP documents that Anaheim has sufficient water supplies from local groundwater, recycled supplies, and imported water purchased from Metropolitan to meet the projected increase in annual demands of approximately 11,000 AF between 2010 and 2035. Given the lower revised demand projections contained in the 2010 UWMP, the plan’s conclusions regarding sufficiency of water supplies to meet projected demands are consistent with the WSA. Sincerely, ARCADIS U.S., Inc. Michael B. Hurley Senior Water Resources Specialist ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix C Revised Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Errata Pages – December 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN ERRATA Appendix A of Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 2008-00340 provide redline changes to the documents that govern and regulate development within the Anaheim Specific Plan area. The changes shown below in green, indicate proposed changes to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan that were not included in Appendix A. Deletions are shown in strikethrough and additions are shown in bold. Changes shown in red were included in Appendix A. Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction On September 27, 1994, the Anaheim City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5453 relating to the establishment of Zoning and Development Standards for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) No. 92-2 by the addition of Chapter 18.48 to the Anaheim Municipal Code, and Ordinance No. 5454, amending the zoning map to reclassify approximately 549.5 acres of certain real property into the ARSP. The ARSP was specifically designated by the City’s General Plan for recreation and tourist/convention-related activities. Since the adoption of the ARSP, proposed modifications to the specific plan having have included 14 amendments and 6 adjustments, which have included an expansion of the ARSP area to include 31.8 additional acres, increasing the total acreage of the ARSP area to 581.3 acres. ARSP Amendment No. 1. In June 1997, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 344, Amendment No. 1 to the ARSP, and Conditional Use Permit No. 3917. These actions designated 4.67 acres, located on the northern side of Orangewood Avenue and east of Harbor Boulevard, for Commercial Recreation land use and incorporated the site into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2) Zone. Conditional Use Permit No. 3917 approved the conversion of an existing 139-unit, 2-story, 8-building apartment complex on this site into a 136-unit Vacation Ownership Resort known as “Dolphin Cove.” ARSP Amendment No. 2. In October 1998, Amendment No. 2 to the ARSP was proposed to amend Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to add “coffee house” as a Conditionally Permitted Accessory Use in conjunction with an Automotive Service Station. The Planning Commission denied the amendment and the Applicant subsequently withdrew the petition at the January 26, 1999, City Council meeting. ARSP Adjustment No. 1. In May 1999, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 1 to the ARSP, which amended Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort ---PAGE BREAK--- Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to modify the setback and yard requirements to reflect the local street status of Convention Way. ARSP Amendment No. 3. In August 1999, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 364 and Amendment No. 3 to the ARSP. These actions designated an approximate 0.73-acre site, located at the northwestern corner of Casa Grande Avenue and Casa Vista Street, for Commercial Recreation land use and reclassified the site into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2) Zone. The site is developed with 44 guest rooms of a 100-room motel. Prior to the amendments, the site was designated for Medium Density Residential land uses, while the balance of the motel (lobby and 56 guest rooms) was included in the SP 92-2 Zone and designated for Commercial Recreation land uses. As a result of the amendments, the entire hotel site is designated for Commercial Recreation land use and located in the SP 92-2 Zone. ARSP Adjustment No. 2. In September 1999, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 2 to the ARSP, which amended Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to modify the minimum landscape setback requirement for properties adjacent to Manchester Avenue between Katella Avenue and the southern boundary of the ARSP area. ARSP Adjustment No. 3. In May 2001, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 3 to the ARSP, which amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) relating to temporary parking requirements including time limitations, landscape and screening requirements, and permitted fence and wall materials. ARSP Adjustment No. 4. In April 2004, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 4 to the ARSP, which amended Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to permit office uses in legal nonconforming buildings subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. ARSP Amendment No. 4. In June 2004, the City Council adopted Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, a comprehensive update of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. This code amendment incorporated ARSP Amendment No. 4, which included modifications to Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) intended to streamline the project review process. ARSP Amendment No. 5. In June 2004, the City Council approved Amendment No. 5 to the ARSP in conjunction with a comprehensive update of the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code. Amendment No. 5 expanded The Anaheim Resort™ to the southern City limits by incorporating ---PAGE BREAK--- approximately 26.4 acres, located along Harbor Boulevard, south of Orangewood Avenue, into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2) Zone. ARSP Amendment No. 6. In February 2005, the City Council approved Amendment No. 6 to the ARSP. This amendment modified Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to permit convenience markets to sell beer and wine for off-premises consumption, as an accessory use to service stations in conjunction with the relocation of an existing service station, if such service station is relocated from a location with street frontage on Harbor Boulevard to a location not fronting on Harbor Boulevard. ARSP Amendment No. 7 In August 2006, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00042 and Amendment No. 7 to the ARSP to create a residential overlay that would allow the development of residential uses in certain targeted areas when such uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300-room full service hotel. ARSP Adjustment No. 5 In August 2006, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 5 to the ARSP, which amended Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) in its entirety to provide consistent formatting with Title 18 (Zoning Code) along with minor modifications and clarifications. ARSP Amendment No. 7 In August 2006, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00042 and Amendment No. 7 to the ARSP to create a residential overlay that would allow the development of residential uses in certain targeted areas when such uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300-room full service hotel. ARSP Amendment No. 8. In April 2007, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00448 and Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP to allow for wholly-residential development, fifteen percent of which must be comprised of rental units affordable to low or very-low income households, on a designated 26.7-acre site located south and east of Katella Avenue and Haster Street. ARSP Amendment No. 9. In November 2007, City Council repealed General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00448 and initiated Amendment No. 9 to the ARSP to repeal Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP. In March 2008, City Council approved Amendment No. 9, which removed all provisions in Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) related to wholly-residential development, with the exception of residential uses in certain targeted areas when such uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300-room full service hotel (as approved by Amendment No. ---PAGE BREAK--- ARSP Amendment No. 10. In February 2008, Planning Commission reviewed a proposal for a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment (Amendment No. 10 to the ARSP), Zoning Reclassification, Conditional Use Permit, Final Site Plan, Development Agreement, Tentative Parcel Map, and Tentative Tract Map to allow a 102-room hotel with 14,714 square feet of accessory commercial uses and a 191-unit condominium complex on approximately 5 acres located at 2232 Harbor Boulevard, in the southern portion of the ARSP area. Prior to the City Council taking final action on this request, the applicant withdrew the proposal due to the approval of the “SOAR” Initiative. ARSP Amendment No. 11. In March 2008, under General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00466 and Amendment No. 11 to the ARSP, City Council adopted an initiative measure, known as the “SOAR” Initiative, to amend the General Plan and ARSP to generally prohibit residential development within The Anaheim Resort unless such a project included environmental and economic analysis, City Council approval, and voter approval at a city election. ARSP Amendment No. 12. In October 2008, City Council approved Amendment No. 12 to the ARSP, which increased the allowable density on a 5.9-acre project site from C-R Low Density (50 hotel rooms per gross acre) to C-R Low Medium Density (75 hotel rooms per gross acre). The site was divided into two separate parcels, allowing development of 154 hotel rooms on Parcel 1 and up to 288 hotel rooms on Parcel 2 for a total of up to 442 hotel rooms. ARSP Amendment No. 13. In March 2009, City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00470, Amendment No. 13 to the ARSP and an amendment to the Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program. These amendments modified the text in the General Plan Land Use Element and the ARSP to reflect a new density category created for the Commercial Recreation District, called “Low Medium Density (Modified); modified the Central Core and Special Intersection Landscape Treatment exhibits to allow special landscape and hardscape treatments at the corner of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue; modified the sign code to allow a greater number and larger signs than currently permitted for hotels and accessory retail; allowed changeable copy signs for hotels when not visible from any public right-of-way, murals, and building integrated multi-tenant signs subject to approval of a conditional use permit. ARSP Adjustment No. 6. In June 2012, City Council approved Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00106, which included Adjustment No. 6 to the ARSP. This adjustment modified the Code references and terminology for Restaurants with Outdoor Dining, Restaurants with Accessory Entertainment, Dance Venues, Massage Establishments, Amusement Devices, Amusement Arcades and Health Clubs to be consistent with Chapters 18.16 (Regulatory Permits) and 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 (Zoning Code). ---PAGE BREAK--- ARSP Amendment No. 14. In City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00482 and Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP to update the ARSP to reflect current development conditions and regulations and increase the maximum allowable square footage in the Public Recreational (PR) district to accommodate future expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center. Chapter 5.0 Design Plan (Page 5-1) The Design Plan contains descriptions of the basic concepts that will help achieve the ARSP's fundamental goal of creating a unified resort identity for the ARSP area. Written text in this Section describes the fundamental design concepts, while the drawings that accompany the text show how the concepts will be implemented. The Design Plan has been coordinated with several adopted documents that describe design concepts for the ARSP area. These documents include The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program, and The Anaheim Resort Identity Program. In addition, this Section is intended to supplement the Zoning and Development Standards contained in Section 7.0, which is codified as Chapter 18.118 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Since the public streets are the interface between the ARSP and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, both specific plans describe in detail the design of the public streets, as well as the treatment of setback areas adjacent to public streets. The emphasis in both plans is on creating unity through landscape design, a standardized design vocabulary for streetscape elements (such as light poles and directional signs), and regulation of private property, including standards for signs, building heights, and setbacks. For ease of reference and to better depict the relationship between the two specific plans, the ARSP contains information about the treatment of all public streets that border or are within the ARSP area boundaries. As a result, there is an overlap in the information contained in both specific plans along the border between the two areas. For example, the description and illustrations of the design concept for Harbor Boulevard appear in both specific plans. On September 20, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94R-239 approving The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program. Subsequent amendments have been adopted including Resolution No. 96R-178 (Amendment No. 99R-137 (Amendment No. 2002R-56 (Amendment No. 2009R-037 (Amendment No. and _______(Amendment No. The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program summarizes landscape concepts proposed for the public streets within The Anaheim Resort and provides a general overview of the different landscape treatments that will help create a unifying resort identity. ---PAGE BREAK--- The ARSP is also consistent with The Anaheim Resort Identity Program approved by the City Council by adoption of Resolution No. 94R-238 and amended by Resolution Nos. 2001R-239 (Amendment No. 1) and (Amendment No. The Anaheim Resort Identify Identity Program contains specific recommendations for the location and design of gateways, directional signs, banners, light fixtures, and street furniture for The Anaheim Resort. Section 5.5 of the ARSP summarizes how signs and other identity elements will help create the unified environment envisioned for the entire Anaheim Resort area. The information in this Section supplements the Zoning and Development Standards contained in Section 7.0 in the following ways. First, it describes the fundamental design ideas and concepts that are the basis for the standards and regulations. This description of the basic concepts will assist in the interpretation of the intent of the ARSP in situations where several options may be consistent with the regulations. Also, it contains design guidelines that would be considered too general to be standards or regulations, but convey useful information about the character and quality of development anticipated within the ARSP area. Finally, this Section contains sketches, cross-sections and photos that show what the physical appearance of important conditions in the ARSP area should be if the standards, regulations, and guidelines are implemented in accordance with this section and Section 7.0. By showing how the two work together, the intent of the ARSP can be conveyed in a more comprehensive manner. Chapter 7.0 Zoning and Development Standards - Title 18 (Zoning Code) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2010-00093) TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Agricultural uses crops P Alcoholic Beverages – Off-Sale N Except as permitted subject to Section 18.116.070.090 or as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel. Alcoholic Beverages – On-Sale P Ambulance Services N ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Amusement parks, theme-type complexes, aviaries, zoos C Such uses may include the keeping of animals or birds used in the operation of the facility, provided that such animals or birds shall be maintained in physical confinement sufficient to prohibit the movement of said animals or birds upon any real property not owned or under the lawful possession or control of the person or entity owning or controlling said animals or birds. Further, no animals or birds shall be confined closer than forty (40) feet from any building used for human habitation, including hotel or motel rooms, and no closer than forty (40) feet from any property line. Conditional use permits for the keeping of animals and birds shall specify the maximum number and type of animals and birds permitted. Any increase in the number and/or variations in the type of animals and birds kept shall require either an amendment to said conditional use permit or a new conditional use permit. Animal Boarding C No animals or birds shall be confined closer than forty (40) feet from any building used for human habitation, including hotel or motel rooms, and no closer than forty (40) feet from any property line. Conditional use permits for the keeping of animals and birds shall specify the maximum number and type of animals and birds permitted. Any increase in the number and/or variations in the type of animals and birds kept shall require either an amendment to said conditional use permit or a new conditional use permit. Animal Grooming N Antennas – Broadcasting C Antennas - Telecommunications T Stealth facilities integrated within a building are permitted subject to Section 18.38.060 and Section 18.62.020 Freestanding ground-mounted facilities including stealth facilities are not permitted. Automated Teller Machines (ATM’s) P Shall be located wholly within a building or within a hotel complex in a location not visible from the public right-of-way. Subject to Section 18.36.040. Art galleries C ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Automotive – Parking Lots or Parking Structures/Garages C Parking lots or parking structures/garages not otherwise permitted by Table 116-D. Automotive – Car Sales and Rental N/C Car sales are prohibited. Automotive - Rental not otherwise permitted by Table 116-D requires a conditional use permit. Automotive – Parts Sales N Automotive – Public Parking C Parking lots or parking structures/garages not otherwise permitted by Table 116-D. Automotive – Repair and Modification N Automotive – Service Station C Subject to requirements of Chapter Section 18.38.070 (Automotive Service Stations) and subsection 18.116.070.090. Automotive – Service Station: Convenience Markets or Mini- markets with or without the sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption N Except as permitted subject to Section 18.116.070.090. Automotive –Service Station: Rental and/or display of utility trailers or trucks N Automotive –Service Station: Sale of alcoholic beverages for on- premises and/or off- premises consumption N Except as permitted subject to Section 18.116.070.090 ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Automotive – Service Station: Tow Truck Operations C In conjunction with an Automotive - Service Station only subject to the following: A maximum of one tow truck shall be permitted. When on-site, the tow truck shall be screened from view of the public right-of-way at all times. All vehicles towed to the site shall be stored indoors in a service bay. Under no circumstances shall outdoor storage of the towed vehicles be permitted. No additional signage advertising tow truck operations shall be permitted. Tow truck operations or towing services not in compliance with the above requirements shall be prohibited. Automotive – Washing C In conjunction with an Automotive – Service Station only. Bars & C Bed and Breakfast Inns N Beekeeping N Billboards N As defined in subsection 18.116.160.010 (Definitions Pertaining to Signs). Bingo N Boat and RV Sales N Building and Material Sales N Cemeteries N ---PAGE BREAK--- -10- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Christmas tree sales lots and/or stands N Commercial retail centers N Including commercial retail centers, strip shopping centers, mini- malls and other shopping centers not in conformance with the requirements of a Specialty Retail Center, as defined in Section 18.116.030 (Definitions) and detailed within this table (Table 116-C) “Specialty Retail Centers”. Computer Internet Facility C Community and Religious Assembly C Computer Internet & Amusement Facilities C Convalescent & Rest Homes N Convenience markets or mini-markets Stores N Except as allowed by Section 18.116.070.090 Conversion of hotels or motels to semi- permanent or permanent living quarters N Except a caretaker/manager unit may be provided as specified in Table 116-D, or vacation ownership resorts as detailed within this table (Table 116-C) “Vacation Ownership”. Dance Venue C As defined in Section 18.92.070 Words, Terms And Phrases.) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Dance & Fitness Studios – Large N Dance & Fitness Studios – Small N Permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel ---PAGE BREAK--- -11- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Day Care Centers N Permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel Drive-Through Facilities N Dwelling units N Single-family or multiple-family, except caretaker/manager units allowed as an accessory use integrated within a hotel, motel or vacation ownership resort. Educational Institutions – Business C Educational Institutions – General C Emergency Medical Facilities C Entertainment Venue C Equipment Rental – Large N Equipment Rental – Small N Golf Courses & Country Clubs C Group Care Facilities N Headshop N Heliport N As defined in Chapter 18.92 (Definitions). Helistop C As defined in Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) (excluding heliports); that any such helistop shall be located a minimum of one thousand (1,000) feet from any residentially zoned property. ---PAGE BREAK--- -12- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Hotels and motels located north of Orangewood Avenue P Including suite type hotels Hotels and motels located south of Orangewood C Including suite type hotels Hospitals N As defined in Chapter 18.92 (Definitions). Industrial Uses Industry N As set forth in Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zones) Industry-Heavy N Inflatable advertising display N Junkyards N Kitchens or kitchenettes C In hotel or motel guest rooms or suites. Massage establishments C Those integrated within a hotel or motel only, for which a permit is required pursuant to Section 18.16.070 (Massage) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Markets-Large N Markets-Small N Medical & Dental Offices N Mobile home parks N Except as otherwise permitted by Section 18.116.120 (Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay) for parcels encompassed by the MHP Overlay as identified on Exhibit 3.3.2a of the Specific Plan document (Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay Zone). Expansion of existing facilities to increase the number of mobile homes or mobile home spaces is prohibited. ---PAGE BREAK--- -13- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Mortuaries N Museums C Nonconforming Structures and Uses – Expansion of nonconforming uses and structures C Provided that the expansion brings the use and/or structure into greater conformity with the intent of the Specific Plan. Nonconforming Structure – Facade improvements not exceeding 5% of the building floor area P Provided that the improvements are in substantial conformance with the building envelope, do not adversely impact any adjacent parcels and are in conformance with the Design Plan. If the Planning Director determines that adverse impacts would occur from the improvements or if the improvements are not in substantial conformance with the building envelope, the plans shall be referred to the Planning Commission as a conditional use permit. Nonconforming Structure – Facade improvements exceeding 5% of the building floor area C Nonconforming Structure – Office uses in a legal nonconforming building C Non-publicly operated convention centers C Including exhibition halls and auditoriums Offices - Development C Office buildings when accessory to, and integrated as part of, an on-site permitted primary or when located in a legal non- conforming building. ---PAGE BREAK--- -14- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Offices – General C Office buildings when accessory to, and integrated as part of, an on-site permitted primary or when located in a legal non- conforming building. Oil Production N Outdoor advertising of merchandise, products and/or services N Including, but not limited to, merchandise promotions, sales, pricing, etc. Outdoor sales events N Including Christmas Tree/Pumpkin sales lots or stands Outdoor storage yards of goods and materials N Except as otherwise permitted in this Zone Personal Services – General N Permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel Personal Services - Restricted N Plant Nurseries N Public Services C Pawnshops N Pennants or pennant- type banners N Where visible from a public right-of-way and/or adjacent property Recreation-Billiards C Recreation Buildings and Structures, as defined by Section 18.116.030, are permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel Recreation–Bowling Commercial Indoor C Including sales of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption Recreation Buildings and Structures, as defined by Section 18.116.030, are permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel ---PAGE BREAK--- -15- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Recreation –Golf Courses/ Miniature golf courses Commercial Outdoor C Recreation Buildings and Structures, as defined by Section 18.116.030, are permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel Recreation –Low Impact C Recreation Buildings and Structures, as defined by Section 18.116.030, are permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel Recreation –Outdoor recreational playground areas P In conjunction with permitted primary uses and structures listed in Table 116-C only Recreation –Swimming & Tennis C Recreation Buildings and Structures, as defined by Section 18.116.030, are permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel Recreation –Skating rinks C Recreational vehicle and campsite parks C Limited to use for short-term visits, not to exceed 30 days in any calendar year, by tourists and visitors. Recycling Services – Consumer General N Recycling Services - Processing N Repair Services - General N Repair Services – Limited N Research & Development N Residential hotels/motels N ---PAGE BREAK--- -16- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Restaurants –General P Enclosed and or with outdoor dining, with or without sale of alcoholic beverages for on premises consumption, as defined in Chapter 18.92 (Definitions). Restaurants allowed as permitted uses shall be full service establishment. Such establishments may provide take-out service, but as a limited, ancillary function only. Outdoor seating areas visible from the public right-of-way shall not include table umbrellas that display any symbol, name, writing or product advertising. Restaurants –Drive-in or Drive-through N Restaurants – Outdoor Dining P Restaurants allowed as permitted uses shall be full service establishment. Such establishments may provide take-out service, but as a limited, ancillary function only. Outdoor seating areas visible from the public right-of-way shall not include table umbrellas that display any symbol, name, writing or product advertising. Restaurants – Walk-Up N Restaurants allowed as permitted uses shall be full service establishment. Such establishments may provide take-out service, but as a limited, ancillary function only Restaurants with accessory entertainment with cover charge C Pursuant to and as defined in Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) Retail Sales - General N Permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel or subject to the requirements for a specialty retail center Retail Sales - Kiosk N Permitted by right as an accessory use incidental to and integrated within a hotel or motel or as part of a conditional use permit for a specialty retail center Retail Sales – Outdoor N Retail Sales – Used Merchandise N Room & Board N ---PAGE BREAK--- -17- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Sale of alcoholic beverages for on- premises and/or off- premises consumption N Except as otherwise expressly permitted in conjunction with automobile service station convenience markets or min-markets subject to Code Section 18.116.070.090. Secondhand shops N Self Storage N Sex-oriented businesses N As defined in Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) Specialty retail centers C Where all goods and services are oriented, marketed and intended for tourist, visitor and/or recreational consumers and not oriented to the general public. Such centers shall Consist of a minimum of five acres; Have integrated management; Have a “festive theme” orientation; Plazas and/or other pedestrian-oriented amenities shall be part of the center’s design as set forth in the Design Plan; and, Land uses may include, but need not be limited to: custom print and art shops; souvenir, gift, and/or novelty shops; toy shops; hobby shops; photo supply shops; clothing stores; confectionery shops, including candy stores, ice cream parlors, baked goods cookies, muffins, etc.) for on-premises sale or consumption; floral shops; luggage and accessory shops; jewelry stores; sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption; sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption; entertainment facilities; and amusement arcades, subject to the provisions of Section 18.16.050 (Amusement Devices). A complete listing of proposed uses shall be submitted with every conditional use permit application. ---PAGE BREAK--- -18- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Structures –Height exceeding 1/2 the distance from the building or structure to a single- family, multi- family and/or MHP Overlay zone boundary. C Structures within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of any single- family residential zone boundary (other than property under a resolution of intent to any commercial zone), or, for property located south of Orangewood Avenue, within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of any multi-family residential zone boundary (other than property under a resolution of intent to any commercial zone), or property within the Specific Plan area encompassed by the MHP Overlay as shown on Exhibit 3.3.2a3 (Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay Zone) exceeding a height equal to one-half (1/2) the distance from said building or structure to said zone or overlay boundary. Dedicated streets shall be included in calculating distance. Heights shall not exceed the maximum heights defined in Section 18.40.080 (Structural Height limitation - Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area). Structures –Height Limits exceeding the maximum heights defined in Section 18.40.080 (Structure Height Limitation – Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area). N Structures –Interior Setbacks N Interior setbacks less than two times the height of any proposed building or structure when such building or structure is within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of any single-family residential zone boundary (other than property under a resolution of intent to any commercial zone), or, for property located south of Orangewood Avenue, within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of any multi-family residential zone boundary (other than property under a resolution of intent to any commercial zone), or property within the Specific Plan area encompassed by the MHP Overlay as shown on Exhibit 3.3.2a3 (Mobile Home Park (MPH) Overlay Zone). Structures originally designed or intended for residential use but used for non-residential purposes N ---PAGE BREAK--- -19- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Studios –Broadcasting C Including accommodations for filming/taping in front of live audiences Studios –Recording C Including accommodations for filming/taping in front of live audiences Theaters C Including dinner, legitimate or motion picture theaters, performance theaters or clubs, and indoor or outdoor amphitheaters Tow truck operators Towing Services C Permitted only in conjunction with an automotive service station facility. See Automotive –Service Stations Tow Truck Operations Permitted only in conjunction with Automotive – Service Station Trailer and Truck Rental Services N Transportation facility C As defined in paragraph subsection 18.116.030.080 Words, Terms and Phrases) of this chapter; helistops, as defined in Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) (excluding heliports); provided that any such station or helistop shall be located a minium of one thousand (1,000) feet from any residentially zoned property Truck Repair & Sales N Uses or activities not listed N Uses or activities not specifically listed in this chapter which are inconsistent or incompatible with the intended purpose of the Specific Plan are prohibited. C Uses or activities not specifically listed or prohibited in this chapter may be established by conditional use permit when determined by the Planning Commission to be consistent and compatible with the intended purpose of the Specific Plan. Utilities –Major C As defined in paragraph 18.36.040.210 Utilities –Minor P As defined in paragraph 18.36.040.210 and subject to paragraph 18.116.100 (Screening, Walls, Fences, Landscaping and Lighting –Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area ---PAGE BREAK--- -20- TABLE 116-C PRIMARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Prohibited T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Vacation ownership resorts C Subject to compliance with the requirements of Section 18.116.150 (Requirements for Vacation Ownership Resorts) Veterinary Services N Warehousing & Storage-Enclosed N Wholesaling N TABLE 116-E ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO AND INTEGRATED WITHIN A HOTEL OR MOTEL INCLUDING SUITE-TYPE HOTELS, AND OTHERWISE LIMITED HEREIN: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Permitted T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Alcoholic Beverages – Off-Sale P Alcoholic Beverages – On-Sale P Amusement arcades Devices P No public access directly from the exterior of the building. Subject to Section 18.16.050 (Amusement Devices). Antennas- Dish P Subject to Section 18.38.050 Antennas-Receiving P Subject to Section 18.38.050 ---PAGE BREAK--- -21- TABLE 116-E ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO AND INTEGRATED WITHIN A HOTEL OR MOTEL INCLUDING SUITE-TYPE HOTELS, AND OTHERWISE LIMITED HEREIN: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Permitted T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Automobile - Rental agency offices P With a maximum of three parking spaces for on-site parking of vehicles available for rental in reserved parking spaces in a location not visible from the public right-of-way. Said spaces should be in addition to those required by Chapter 18.42 (Parking and Loading) and subject to Section 18.116.140 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements). Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) P Shall be located wholly within a building or within a hotel complex in a location not visible from the public right-of-way. Subject to Section 18.36.040. Banquet/Meeting Room P Bingo Establishments N Banking facilities Business & Financial Services P Including automated teller machines located wholly within a building or within a hotel complex in a location not visible from the public right-of-way. Caretaker Unit P One unit Limited to less than one thousand two-hundred twenty-five (1,225) gross square feet in size Must comply with the parking standards for dwellings under Chapter 18.06 (Multiple Family Residential Zones). Barber shops P Beauty shops P Book stores P Including newspaper and periodical sales Clothing stores P ---PAGE BREAK--- -22- TABLE 116-E ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO AND INTEGRATED WITHIN A HOTEL OR MOTEL INCLUDING SUITE-TYPE HOTELS, AND OTHERWISE LIMITED HEREIN: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Permitted T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Confectionery shops P Including candy stores, ice cream parlors and establishment selling bakery goods and/or coffee Custom print and art galleries P Day Care services Centers P Limited strictly to the use of the guests and/or employees of such hotel or motel Dog/cat kennels Animal Boarding P Limited strictly to the pets of guests and patrons of such hotel or motel, provided such kennels shall not be located closer than forty (40) feet from hotel/motel guest rooms or residentially zoned property. Drugstores P Floral shops P Entertainment - Accessory P Subject to Section 18.16.060 Health spas/physical fitness center Dance and Fitness Studios - Small P Limited strictly to the use of the guests and/or employees of such hotel or motel Fences and walls P Subject to Section 18.116.100 (Screening, Walls, Fences, Landscaping and Lighting –Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) Landscaping & Gardens P Subject to Section 18.116.100 (Screening, Walls, Fences, Landscaping and Lighting –Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- -23- TABLE 116-E ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO AND INTEGRATED WITHIN A HOTEL OR MOTEL INCLUDING SUITE-TYPE HOTELS, AND OTHERWISE LIMITED HEREIN: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Permitted T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Mechanical and Utility Equipment –Ground Mounted P Subject to Section 18.116.100 (Screening, Walls, Fences, Landscaping and Lighting –Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) Mechanical and Utility Equipment –Roof- Mounted P Subject to Section 18.116.100 (Screening, Walls, Fences, Landscaping and Lighting –Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) Outdoor Displays N Outdoor Storage N Jewelry stores P Laundry facilities and Dry Cleaning services P Limited strictly to the use of the guests and/or employees of such hotel or motel Luggage and accessory shops P Meeting/banquet facilities P One caretaker/manager residential unit P Less than one thousand two-hundred twenty-five (1,225) gross square feet in size subject to compliance with the parking standards for Multiple-Family Dwellings under Chapter 18.06 (Multiple Family Residential Zones). Parking Lots & Garages P To provide off-street parking spaces, as required by this Code, to serve the on-site uses permitted under this chapter. Petroleum Storage – Incidental N Outdoor food and/or beverage carts Portable C In conjunction with a hotel and subject to the following: The design of the cart shall be compatible with the ---PAGE BREAK--- -24- TABLE 116-E ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO AND INTEGRATED WITHIN A HOTEL OR MOTEL INCLUDING SUITE-TYPE HOTELS, AND OTHERWISE LIMITED HEREIN: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Permitted T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Food Carts architectural design and/or theme of the hotel. The cart shall not be permitted to encroach into any required setback areas. One non-illuminated business identification sign, not exceeding four square feet in area with a maximum letter and/or logo height of 10-inches, may be displayed on or below the valance of the roof canopy. One menu pricing sign, not to exceed 12-inches in width by 18-inches in height, may be displayed on the cart below the roof canopy. One trash receptacle shall be provided adjacent to the cart. The trash receptacle shall be decorative and designed to complement the design of the cart. The trash receptacle and the area around the cart shall be permanently maintained and kept clean by the cart operator. The precise size, number and location of carts shall be determined by conditional use permit, provided that the cart(s) shall not be visible from the public right-of-way. All equipment, products and/or supplies shall be stored wholly on or inside the cart at all times. When not in use, all carts shall be stored in an on-site commissary approved by the Orange County Health Department and specifically shown on plans submitted in connection with a conditional use permit. Such commissary shall be fully enclosed and shall not be visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent properties. The cart operator shall obtain all applicable State and/or local licenses and/or permits and shall prominently display such ---PAGE BREAK--- -25- TABLE 116-E ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO AND INTEGRATED WITHIN A HOTEL OR MOTEL INCLUDING SUITE-TYPE HOTELS, AND OTHERWISE LIMITED HEREIN: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Permitted T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions current and valid licenses and/or permits on the cart at all times. Personal Services – General P Photo supply shops P Postal and copy service facilities P Recreational facilities Recreation Buildings and Structures P Including, but not limited to, outdoor playground areas, tennis and racquetball courts, spas and swimming pools. Limited strictly to the use of the guests and/or employees of such hotel or motel. Restaurants – Drive- Through N Restaurants - General P Enclosed or with outdoor dining Restaurants – Outdoor Dining P Restaurants – Walk-Up P Restaurants P Enclosed or with outdoor dining, full-service, walk-up, fast food and/or delicatessen only Retail Floor, Wall & Window Coverings N Retail Sales - General P Retail Sales - Kiosk P ---PAGE BREAK--- -26- TABLE 116-E ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO AND INTEGRATED WITHIN A HOTEL OR MOTEL INCLUDING SUITE-TYPE HOTELS, AND OTHERWISE LIMITED HEREIN: C-R DISTRICT (DEVELOPMENT AREA 1) P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit N Permitted T Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required Classes of Uses C-R District Special Provisions Retail Sales – Outdoor N Retail Sales – Used Merchandise N Signs P Subject to Section 18.116.160 (Signs) Thematic Elements P Subject to Section 18.116.160 (Signs) Vending Machines P Shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way and shall not encroach onto sidewalks. Warehousing & Storage – Outdoors N Sales of alcoholic beverages P On-premises and off-premises consumption Shoe repair shops P Souvenir, gift, and/or novelty shops P Including sales of sundry items Ticket agencies P Tobacco shops P Travel agencies P TABLE 116-Q FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGNS Street Frontage 0-60 ft. >60-150 ft. >150-300 ft. >300 ft. ---PAGE BREAK--- -27- TABLE 116-Q FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGNS Street Frontage 0-60 ft. >60-150 ft. >150-300 ft. >300 ft. Maximum Sign Area Per Sign Face None See Planning Standard Detail Nos. 5, 6 and 7 on file in the Planning Department. Maximum Number of Signs Per Lot None One per street frontage. One per six hundred and sixty (660) feet of street frontage. Minimum Setback From Public Right-of- Way Not Applicable Two feet Except adjacent to Harbor Boulevard between Orangewood Avenue and Interstate-5 Freeway and adjacent to Katella Avenue between Walnut Street and Interstate-5 Freeway where it shall be zero feet. Maximum Height to Top Not Applicable Nine feet oriented on a horizontal format. Eleven and one half (11.5) feet oriented on a vertical format. Sign Copy Not Applicable Name and/or logo of the development and/or name and/or logo of up to three tenants/accessory uses. Total area for sign copy shall not exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of total sign face and shall not be closer than ten (10) inches to any edge. Illumination Not Applicable Illumination Limitations No bare bulbs, exposed neon, animated or flashing signs. Allowable illumination Letters/symbols routed from painted opaque background with internally illuminated push-through copy. Ground mounted spotlights screed from public view by landscaping. Other Limitations Not Applicable All signs to be mounted on the standard Anaheim Resort sign base which is not included in the area calculation of the sign. Standard sign base shall be precast colored concrete as specified in the Anaheim Resort Identity Program. An Anaheim Resort logo shall appear on three sides of each column on the standard sign base. ---PAGE BREAK--- -28- TABLE 116-Q FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGNS Street Frontage 0-60 ft. >60-150 ft. >150-300 ft. >300 ft. Signs shall identify development address in the location specified on sign details on file in the Planning Department, using the typeface consistent with the identity sign elements for the street address. All signs except corner locations shall be located in the middle 40% of the street frontage. For corner locations signs may be located at the corner. Any attachments or “riders” to signs shall be prohibited. All signs shall be placed perpendicular to the street. For Hotels/Motels, affiliation and vacancy information signs shall be in the location designated on the standard base diagram. ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix D The Anaheim Resort Identity Program Errata Pages – December 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- THE ANAHEIM RESORT IDENTITY PROGRAM ERRATA Appendix C The Anaheim Resort Identity Program Appendix A of The Anaheim Resort Identity Program includes an “Exhibit This exhibit should be dated September 18, 2001. ---PAGE BREAK---