Full Text
Appendices Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental EIR City of Anaheim Appendix F Traffic Impact Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendices July 2013 This page intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF ANAHEIM HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES REZONING PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL EIR NO. 346 TECHNICAL TRAFFIC STUDY Submitted to: City of Anaheim July 2013 16-J11-1662 Submitted by: ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page ii City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Proposed Project 3 3.0 Methodology 3 3.1 CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL 3 3.2 COMPARISON OF THE ATAM (2000) AND THE ATAM (2012) MODEL INTERSECTION ANALYSES 5 3.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA (SED) SUMMARY 5 3.4 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 6 3.5 CEQA BASELINE 7 4.0 Environmental Setting/CEQA Baseline 7 4.1 FUTURE (2025) PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS FOR THE 2004 APPROVED PROJECT 7 5.0 Environmental Impacts 8 5.1 INTERSECTION-LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS SUMMARY 8 5.2 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FORECASTS 13 5.3 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SUMMARY 13 6.0 Mitigation Measures 14 6.1 APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES FROM THE 2004 CERTIFIED EIR 14 6.2 ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MEASURES 16 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 – SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA (SED) SUMMARY 6 TABLE 2 – INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 6 TABLE 3 – SIGNIFICANT IMPACT CRITERIA 7 TABLE 4 – 2004 APPROVED PROJECT LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) SUMMARY FOR YEAR 2025 8 TABLE 5 – VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SUMMARY 14 TABLE 6 – PROPOSED INTERSECTION MITIGATION 17 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON ATAM 2000 AND ATAM 2012 A1 APPENDIX B: CITY OF ANAHEIM FUTURE 2035 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT PEAK HOUR LOS SUMMARY A11 APPENDIX C: CITY OF ANAHEIM ARTERIAL SEGMENT DAILY LEVEL OF SERVICE A21 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 1 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of a traffic analysis that was conducted for the City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project (the “Proposed Project”). The Proposed Project is comprised of three main elements: 1. Implementation of Housing Element, Housing Production Strategy 1V: Rezoning of Housing Opportunity Sites, 2. Facilitation use of the Statutory Infill Housing Exemption, and 3. An Update of the General Plan Land Use Build-Out Tables The Proposed Project would not change any of the existing land use designations in the Anaheim General Plan. On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 330 (“2004 Certified EIR”) as the environmental documentation for a comprehensive General Plan and Zoning Code Update. As part of these actions, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 was adopted for the General Plan Update and Ordinance No. 5920 was introduced to amend the Zoning Code in its entirety. On June 8, 2004, the Anaheim City Council subsequently adopted Ordinance No. 5920 for the Zoning Code Update. Together, these actions are referred to as the “2004 Approved Project.” Since certification of EIR No. 330 for the 2004 Approved Project, a number of changes have occurred including: 1. 42 separate General Plan amendments have been adopted; 2. A new version of the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM) was approved by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in March 2012; 3. Senate Bill (SB) 97 was signed in to law requiring that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions be analyzed in a CEQA document; and 4. SB 226 was signed in to law allowing cities to utilize various CEQA streamlining provisions for infill projects. As a result, the City has determined that a Supplemental EIR is required to update the 2004 Certified EIR and provide CEQA clearance for the Proposed Project. The City of Anaheim Circulation Element, which is part of the City’s adopted General Plan, is the primary resource for circulation decisions. In addition to the City’s Circulation Element, the Orange County Transportation Authority Master Plan of Arterial Highways defines the City’s build-out circulation system. Anaheim has several arterial highways and freeways within its local boundaries and, therefore, must also coordinate with other transportation agencies such as the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 2 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study In relation to the Proposed Project, the Circulation Element of the General Plan now requires review and analysis due to several factors including the following: 1. A new City of Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM) was developed in 2012 and that model includes revised and updated input data and assumptions such as socioeconomic forecasts and other model components which were updated and revised to match the most current conditions in the City as well as to match regional modeling guidelines and standards 2. The prior version of ATAM (ATAM 2000) had a forecast year of 2025 while the new version (ATAM 2012) has a 2035 future forecast year and that forecast year now matches the regional forecasts of OCTA and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 3. The Proposed Project will add an overlay zone to designated Housing Opportunity Sites that allow residential development consistent with the property’s General Plan land use designation. Since the General Plan has been modified since the 2004 Approved Project, this study assesses the most current General Plan land use as the proposed land use for the Proposed Project. As noted, because there is a new traffic model (ATAM 2012) and also because there have been changes to socioeconomic data forecasts as part of the General Plan, it was necessary to create new future year traffic forecasts and re-evaluate future conditions on the City’s roadway network. This report describes the updates to the traffic analysis that were conducted as part of the 2004 Adopted Project and the Proposed Project and compares the data to the adopted 2004 traffic forecast information. In summary, this document compares the findings from the 2004 Certified EIR to the new 2035 traffic forecasts associated with the Proposed Project to assess how they differ from the 2004 Approved Project and adopted General Plan future year 2025 forecasts. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 3 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study 2.0 PROPOSED PROJECT The Proposed Project analyzed in this traffic study is comprised of three main elements: 1. The City proposes to add one of two possible overlay zones to certain properties identified as Opportunities Sites in the City’s 2006-2014 Housing Element. The overlay zone added to the subject properties would be consistent with each property’s existing General Plan designation. Therefore, the project will not result in increased residential densities beyond those anticipated by the City’s adopted General Plan. In addition, the City proposes a Code amendment to permit residential development “by-right” on designated Housing Opportunity Sites in the Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The addition of the overlay zones to the subject properties and the proposed Code amendment would implement the Housing Element’s Housing Production Strategy 1V: Rezoning of Housing Opportunities Sites. 2. The City proposes to facilitate the opportunity for projects to utilize Public Resources Code Section 21159.24, which allows urban infill residential development that meets certain criteria to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City would facilitate the Statutory Infill Housing Exemption by providing updated community level environmental review, as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21159.20, for properties designated for residential development by the General Plan In addition, the City may utilize the SB 226 CEQA streamlining provisions that went into effect January 1, 2013. 3. The City proposes to update General Plan Land Use Element Tables LU-5: Residential Buildout Estimates and LU-6: Non-Residential Build-Out Estimates to reflect all General Plan Amendments that have been adopted since the City’s General Plan was adopted in May 2004. The Proposed Project would not change any of the existing land use designations in the Anaheim General Plan. 3.0 METHODOLOGY 3.1 CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC MODEL The Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM) has been developed as a tool to help the City forecast future traffic volumes and estimate the traffic effects of changes in land use and roadway facilities. A prior version of ATAM (ATAM 2000) was used for the 2004 Approved Project while this analysis uses the new updated version of ATAM (ATAM 2012). ATAM 2012 has been developed in accordance with the Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual (December 2010) published by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to ensure consistency between local models and the Countywide model. The ATAM 2012 city-wide traffic model was developed using the TRANPLAN transportation modeling software. TRANPLAN is a commercially available modeling software package platform that enables four- step travel demand modeling. The model's network and zone system were developed to provide an appropriate level of detail for local circulation system planning, while incorporating the influences of ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 4 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study regional through traffic on the City arterial system; this was accomplished by developing a focused model. The model produces separate assignments of total daily traffic, morning peak period traffic, and afternoon peak period traffic, reflecting traffic volumes on an average day in the City. Forecasts were developed for the existing and updated General Plan build-out scenario. The following section provides a brief overview of the modeling process. ATAM 2012 uses the existing conditions base year of OCTAM 3.3. All elements of the OCTAM regional model were carefully reviewed and updated for purposes of developing a refined citywide model. Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) were finely disaggregated to enable more precise traffic forecasting for major event centers, schools, and other uses throughout the City. ATAM 2000 was a tiered subarea model consistent with OCTAM 3.1 and it included 493 TAZs within the City. ATAM 2012 includes a total of 1,268 TAZs within the City to allow for more refined consideration of alternative modes and mixed use trip interactions. Like most local models, ATAM 2012 uses land use as the basis for generating trips. To achieve consistency with OCTAM, ATAM 2012 converts land uses into socioeconomic data (dwelling units and employment) prior to calculating trip generation. ATAM 2012 uses the trip generation rates recommended in the subarea modeling guidelines. ATAM 2012 includes a post-processing function to improve the usefulness of its forecasts, providing peak hour turning movement forecasts and level of service calculations at signalized intersections throughout the City. The post processor applies the model’s estimate of future growth to the existing traffic counts to forecast future intersection peak hour turning volumes. As noted, the model was updated in 2012 and has been used to reassess the 2035 traffic conditions at study intersections. The ATAM 2012 model includes changes to land use forecasts related to the general plan amendments completed since 2004 and the Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project as well as other changes to future land use assumptions. ATAM 2000 had a horizon year of 2025 rather than 2035. The updated network for ATAM 2012 differs from the existing General Plan system in a few key areas. The changes noted below have been analyzed in various technical studies since the adoption of the 2004 General Plan Update. These changes include: Deletion of Jamboree Road south of Weir Canyon Road Downgrade of Weir Canyon Road to Primary Arterial south of Oak Canyon Road Grade separations and connector roads parallel to Orangethorpe Avenue at Tustin Avenue, Lakeview Avenue, and Imperial Highway Upgrade of Tustin Avenue and Kraemer Boulevard to 8-lane Major Arterial between La Palma Avenue and SR-91 Extension of Fairmont Blvd from La Palma Avenue to SR-91 with a new interchange at SR-91. No connection is made to Santa Ana Canyon Road Upgrade of Katella Avenue to an 8-lane Stadium between Manchester Avenue and Anaheim Way Upgrade of Lewis Street to Primary Arterial between Katella Avenue and Cerritos Avenue Upgrade of Douglass Road to Primary Arterial between Katella Avenue and Cerritos Avenue Upgrade of Cerritos Avenue to Primary Arterial between State College Boulevard and Douglass Road ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 5 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study 3.2 COMPARISON OF THE ATAM (2000) AND THE ATAM (2012) MODEL INTERSECTION ANALYSES Iteris performed a comparison of the study intersections from the two versions of the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model - ATAM 2000 and ATAM 2012. The purpose of the comparison was to identify the locations of the intersections and roadway segments for which the forecasted Level of Service (LOS) significantly improved or worsened based on the comparison of the two models and their associated future land use forecasts. The ATAM 2000 model included 250 study intersections whereas the ATAM 2012 model now includes 431 study intersections within the City of Anaheim plus some other locations in the cities of Orange, Fullerton, Garden Grove and Placentia. Note the locations outside of the City of Anaheim are not the focus of the analysis covered by this report; they are included in the model as these locations are frequently requested for analysis by neighboring jurisdictions. After comparing the common study intersections in both models, LOS analysis was also performed for the additional intersections with the ATAM 2012 model. Out of the additional study intersections from the ATAM 2012 model, two intersections were found to be performing at a LOS E or F during the 2035 AM period and six intersections were found to be performing at LOS E or F during the 2035 PM period. A comparison of the common locations is described in the following section. Appendix A shows the LOS comparison for the common study intersections for the ATAM 2000 and the ATAM 2012 models during the AM and PM peak hour periods. As shown by the data in Appendix A for the AM peak hour, five intersections from the ATAM 2000 model run that were performing either a LOS E or F condition improved to LOS or better based on the ATAM 2012 model results. Also during the AM peak hour, six intersections that were performing LOS or better in the ATAM 2000 model run worsened to either LOS E or F based on the ATAM 2012 results. During the PM peak hour, 15 intersections from the ATAM 2000 model run that were performing either a LOS E or F improved to LOS or better based on the ATAM 2012 model results. Also during the AM peak hour, ten intersections that were performing LOS or better in the ATAM 2000 model run worsened to either LOS E or F based on the ATAM 2012 results. Also, the ‘Harbor/Ball’ intersection worsened from LOS E to LOS F during the AM peak hour and remained at LOS F during the PM peak hour based on a comparison on ATAM 2000 and ATAM 2012 results. Appendix B shows the intersection LOS results based on ATAM 2012 for all study intersections, including the common intersections with ATAM 2000 plus added locations for ATAM 2012. 3.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA (SED) SUMMARY Table 1 below shows the 2004 Approved Project population and employment, projected 2035 (Proposed Project horizon year) population and employment, and the difference (raw and percent change) for the City of Anaheim and the region as a whole (Orange County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and Ventura County). These socioeconomic data were derived from ATAM 2000 (for the 2004 data) and ATAM 2012 (for the proposed project data). This information is used within ATAM for purposes of generating vehicle trips that are then used for the traffic forecasts and associated traffic analyses. As shown, the population in the City of Anaheim is projected to increase 37 percent from 354,400 people to 485,900 people, and employment is projected to increase 27 percent from 249,700 jobs to 317,800 jobs between existing/CEQA baseline and future 2035 conditions. On average, ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 6 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study population and employment in the City of Anaheim is projected to increase 12 percent faster and two percent slower, respectively, than the region as a whole. TABLE 1 – SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA (SED) SUMMARY 2004 Approved Project Proposed Project Horizon Year Difference Difference Percent Change Population Employment Population Employment Population Employment Population Employment City of Anaheim 354,400 249,700 485,900 317,800 131,500 68,100 37% 27% Total Region (including Anaheim) 17,063,000 7,445,500 21,261,700 9,618,900 4,198,700 2,173,400 25% 29% 3.4 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS The City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies requires a volume-to-capacity ratio of 1.00, or LOS E as the lowest acceptable level of service at designated CMP intersections, and 0.90, or LOS D, as the lowest acceptable level of service for all other intersections. The City requires all study area intersections LOS be evaluated using the intersection capacity utilization (ICU) methodology. This methodology compares forecast peak hour traffic volumes by direction and critical moves to available intersection capacity based on actual configuration. A minimum clearance interval of 0.05, and lane capacities of 1,700 vehicles per hour of green time for through and turn lanes was used for the ICU calculations. Table 2 presents the ICU level of service thresholds utilized in this traffic study. TABLE 2 – INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Level of Service Interpretation Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio A There are no cycles that are fully loaded, and few are close to loaded. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Typically, the approach appears quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. < 0.60 B Represents stable operation. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles. 0.61 – 0.70 C Stable operation continues. Full signal cycle loading is still intermittent, but more frequent. Occasional drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal intersection, and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. 0.71 – 0.80 D Encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks with the peak period, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing queues, thus preventing excessive backups. 0.81 – 0.90 E Represents the most vehicles that any particular intersection approach can accommodate. At capacity (V/C = 1.00), there may be long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection and delays may be great (up to several signal cycles). 0.91 – 1.00 F Represents jammed conditions. Backups from locations or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach under consideration; hence, volumes carried are not predictable. V/C values are highly variable because full utilization of the approach may be prevented by outside conditions. > 1.00 Source: City of Anaheim ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 7 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Furthermore, within the City of Anaheim, an intersection impact is considered significant if the Project resulting V/C compared to the No Project V/C shows the project related increases meet criteria outlined in Table 3. For purposes of this calculation, the “Final V/C Ratio” includes the future v/c ratio at an intersection, considering traffic from existing conditions, ambient growth, approved/related projects, and the proposed project, but without any proposed mitigation. Mitigation measures sufficient to bring the level of service to a less than significant level are identified later in the report where measures are deemed feasible. TABLE 3 – SIGNIFICANT IMPACT CRITERIA LOS Final V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C C >0.700 – 0.800 Equal to or greater than 0.050 D >0.800 – 0.900 Equal to or greater than 0.030 E, F > 0.900 Equal to or greater than 0.010 Source: City of Anaheim 3.5 CEQA BASELINE Ordinarily, the existing environmental setting provides the baseline physical conditions from which the lead agency determines the significance of environmental impacts resulting from a development project. However, CEQA and supporting case law provide that the baseline for a supplemental environmental impact report is the previously approved project, not the existing conditions at the time that the environmental documentation is prepared. Therefore, because this traffic study is being used as part of a Supplemental EIR that supplements the 2004 Certified EIR, the baseline used for the analyses in this traffic study is the 2004 Approved Project. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING/CEQA BASELINE The ATAM 2000 model was used to forecast traffic volumes associated with buildout of the 2004 Approved Project, with a forecast year of 2025. At the time of that analysis, this scenario represented the future conditions, including all elements of the updated General Plan network. 4.1 FUTURE (2025) PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS FOR THE 2004 APPROVED PROJECT The distribution of LOS grades for AM and PM peak hour for the 2004 Approved Project can be seen in Table 4. Twenty (20) of the study intersections were projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS E or F) during at least one of the peak periods. Four of the intersections were forecast by ATAM 2000 to operate at unacceptable levels in the AM and PM. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 8 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study TABLE 4 – 2004 APPROVED PROJECT LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) SUMMARY FOR YEAR 2025 AM PM # of Intersections LOS # of Intersections LOS 3 F 3 F 3 E 15 E 15 D 21 D 26 C 52 C 51 B 58 B 152 A 101 A The twenty (20) intersections forecast by ATAM 2000 to operate at LOS E or F in 2025 are: Tustin Avenue / La Palma Avenue Imperial Highway / SR-91 East Bound Ramps Douglass Road / Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road (AM and PM) Imperial Highway / Santa Ana Canyon Road (AM and PM) Manchester I-5 South Bound / Katella Avenue (AM and PM) Tustin Avenue / SR-91 East Bound Ramps (AM and PM) Kraemer Boulevard / La Palma Avenue Harbor Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue Weir Canyon Road / Santa Ana Canyon Road Harbor Boulevard / Katella Avenue Dale Street / Lincoln Avenue Imperial Highway / Nohl Ranch Road Imperial Highway / La Palma Avenue Imperial Highway / Orangethorpe Avenue East Street / Lincoln Avenue Beach Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue East Street / Orangethorpe Avenue Weir Canyon Road / SR-91 East Bound Ramps Euclid Street / Katella Avenue 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following analysis compares the impacts of the 2004 Approved Project identified in the 2004 Certified EIR with the impacts of the Proposed Project using the City’s updated ATAM 2012 model. The methodology used for this analysis is described above in Section 4.0. 5.1 INTERSECTION-LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS SUMMARY As shown in Appendix B, according to the results of the ATAM 2012 model, the following locations are forecast to operate at LOS E or F in 2035 with the Proposed Project (see Figure Euclid Street / Lincoln Avenue (AM) Euclid Street / Cerritos Avenue (AM and PM) Euclid Street / Katella Avenue (PM) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 9 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Disneyland Drive / Ball Road (PM) Disneyland Drive / Katella Avenue (PM) Harbor Boulevard / La Palma Avenue (PM) Harbor Boulevard / Lincoln Avenue (AM) Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road (AM and PM) Anaheim Boulevard / Vermont Avenue (AM) East Street / Lincoln Avenue (PM) Lewis Street / Ball Road (PM) State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue (PM) State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue (PM) Sunkist Street / Miraloma Avenue / La Palma Avenue (PM) SR-57 SB Ramps / Orangewood Avenue (PM) Rio Vista Street / Lincoln Avenue (AM) Tustin Avenue / SR-91 WB Ramps (AM) Fairmont Boulevard / La Palma Avenue (PM) Lemon Street / Orangethorpe Avenue (PM) Haster Street / Gene Autry Way (PM) The number of intersections that are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the AM peak hour worsened from six to seven with the Proposed Project using the ATAM 2012 model. However, the number of intersections that are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the PM peak hour improved from 18 to 13 with the Proposed Project based on the ATAM 2012 model results. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 10 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study ---PAGE BREAK--- < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( < ( 5 Iþ 91 Iþ 90 Iþ 90 Iþ 57 Iþ 55 Iþ 91 Iþ 241 405 5 5 Iþ 22 Iþ 22 Iþ 39 Iþ 39 La Palma Ave Lincoln Ave Ball Rd Katella Ave Chapman Ave Garden Grove Blvd Orangethorpe Ave Commonwealth Ave Chapman Ave Magnolia Ave Brookhurst St Euclid St Harbor Blvd East St State College Blvd Glassell St Tustin Ave Tustin Ave Santa Ana Canyon Rd Fairmont Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd Weir Canyon Rd Serrano Ave Santiago Canyon Rd Hewes Ave Newport Ave Cannon St Crescent Ave Orange Ave Cerritos Ave Orangewood Ave Lampson Ave Limestone Canyon Regional Park Chino Hills State Park Chino Hills State Park L o s L o s A n g e l e s A n g e l e s C o u n t y C o u n t y O r a n g e O r a n g e C o u n t y C o u n t y S a n S a n B e r n a r d i n o B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y C o u n t y City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Legend AM/PM Peak Hour LOS LOS A-D LOS E LOS F City of Anaheim ± Figure 1 Future 2035 With Proposed Project Intersections with LOS E or F ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 12 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 13 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study 5.2 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FORECASTS The traffic analysis in the 2004 Certified EIR included General Plan Update Average Daily Traffic Volumes (ADT) for 2035. Daily traffic forecasts are used for noise and air quality analysis, among other purposes. Those daily traffic forecasts were based on the traffic model used at that time. Because there is a new traffic model (ATAM 2012) with a new set of input data and assumptions, there are updated 2035 ADT forecasts based on ATAM 2012 results. Appendix C shows the comparison of the Average Daily Traffic Forecasts for the buildout year of 2025 from ATAM 2000 for the 2004 Approved Project to the most current forecasts generated by ATAM 2012 for the buildout year 2035 for the 2004 Approved Project and the Proposed Project. The values in Appendix C compare arterial segments for which ADT data are available from the 2004 study only (City of Anaheim Environmental Impact Report No. 330, Figure 5.15- 10). 5.3 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SUMMARY Table 5 below shows the 2004 Approved Project vehicle miles traveled (VMT), the Proposed Project projected 2035 (Project horizon year) VMT, and the VMT difference (raw and percent change) for trips within the City of Anaheim, and for trips with either an origin or destination in the City of Anaheim. The VMT matrix also summarizes trips for the remainder of Orange County, as well as other counties, including Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and Ventura County. As shown, under the 2004 Approved Project conditions, the VMT of trips traveling within the City of Anaheim is 889,600, the VMT of trips originating in the City of Anaheim is 7,608,300, and the VMT of trips with a final destination within the City of Anaheim is 7,794,900. Under projected 2035 conditions (project horizon year), the VMT of trips traveling within the City of Anaheim is 1,311,200, the VMT of trips originating in the City of Anaheim is 9,567,900, and the VMT of trips with a final destination within the City of Anaheim is 9,772,400. Based on the 2004 Approved Project VMT and the Proposed Project 2035 (Project horizon year) VMT projections, VMT within the City of Anaheim is projected to increase 47 percent, the VMT of trips originating in the City of Anaheim is projected to increase 26 percent, and the VMT of trips with a final destination within the City of Anaheim is projected to increase 25 percent. When compared to the remainder of Orange County and other counties in Southern California, the VMT within the City of Anaheim is projected to increase 30 percent faster than the remaining portions of Orange County, and 10 percent faster than other counties in Southern California. The VMT of trips originating in the City of Anaheim is projected to increase eight percent faster than the remaining portions of Orange County, and ten percent slower than other counties in Southern California, and the VMT of trips with a final destination in the City of Anaheim is projected to increase seven percent faster than the remaining portions of Orange County, and 11 percent slower than other counties in Southern California. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 14 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study TABLE 5 – VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SUMMARY City of Anaheim Remainder of Orange County Other Counties TOTAL ORIGIN DESTINATION 2004 Approved Project VMT City of Anaheim 889,600 3,489,100 3,229,600 7,608,300 Remainder of Orange County 3,566,100 34,521,800 17,929,000 56,016,900 Other Counties 3,339,200 17,989,700 259,658,400 280,987,300 TOTAL 7,794,900 56,000,600 280,817,000 344,612,500 Proposed Project Horizon Year VMT City of Anaheim 1,311,200 4,314,100 3,942,600 9,567,900 Remainder of Orange County 4,394,700 40,412,400 21,428,600 66,235,700 Other Counties 4,066,500 21,482,400 356,606,800 382,155,700 TOTAL 9,772,400 66,208,900 381,978,000 457,959,300 Raw Difference City of Anaheim 421,600 825,000 713,000 1,959,600 Remainder of Orange County 828,600 5,890,600 3,499,600 10,218,800 Other Counties 727,300 3,492,700 96,948,400 101,168,400 TOTAL 1,977,500 10,208,300 101,161,000 113,346,800 Percent Change City of Anaheim 47% 24% 22% 26% Remainder of Orange County 23% 17% 20% 18% Other Counties 22% 19% 37% 36% TOTAL 25% 18% 36% 33% 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 6.1 APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES FROM THE 2004 CERTIFIED EIR The following mitigation measures were included in the 2004 Certified EIR. These mitigation measures are also included in the Proposed Project, and additional mitigation measures have been added for the purposes of this DSEIR. This DSEIR proposes to make certain modifications to the mitigation measures adopted by the City for the 2004 Approved Project. Modifications to the original mitigation measure are identified in strikeout text to indicate deletions and underlined to signify additions. 5.15-1 The City shall continue to coordinate with Caltrans (designated as lead agency) and the City of Yorba Linda to implement the planned grade separation at the intersection of Imperial Highway/Orangethorpe Avenue. 5.15-2 The General Plan Circulation Element and associated Planned Roadway Network Map (Figure C-1 of the General Plan), identifies those roadways that are planned to accommodate current development and future growth established by the Land Use Element. Roadways will be constructed as development occurs and as funding becomes available. In addition to the roadways identified on the Planned Roadway Network Map, the following improvements will be necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service within the anticipated theoretical buildout identified in the General Plan: Intersection of Dale Ave/Lincoln Ave; add an additional EB right turn lane Intersection of Harbor Blvd/Ball Rd; add a 4th WB through lane Intersection of Sportstown Way/Katella Ave; change NB lane configuration from 1/1/2 to 1.5/.5/2 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 15 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Intersection of Tustin Ave/La Palma Ave; change SB lane configuration from 2/3/1 to 2/4/0 (would require triple left turn lanes, and add a third left turn lane on the NB or WB approach to mitigate to LOS D Intersection of Tustin Ave/SR-91 WB ramps; add a second NB left turn lane Intersection of Imperial Hwy/Santa Ana Canyon Road; add a NB right turn lane (would require triple lefts SB or EB or a 4th through lane NB to mitigate PM peak hour to LOS D) Intersection of Weir Canyon Road/SR-91 EB ramps; add a 4th SB through lane 5.15-3 The City shall pursue all available funding, including Measure M2 funding, necessary to implement the circulation improvements identified in the City’s Circulation Element and Mitigation Measure 5.15-2. Implementation of transportation improvements identified in the City’s Circulation Element and Mitigation Measure 5.15-2 shall be conducted in coordination with Caltrans, the County of Orange, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and surrounding jurisdictions. To qualify for Measure M2 funds, the City of Anaheim must comply with the Countywide Growth Management Program component requirements and have an established policy framework for the required Growth Management Program through the adoption of a Growth Management Element. The updated Growth Management Element will maintain provisions of the existing Growth Management element which: 1) establishes policy statements that identify acceptable traffic levels of service (LOS); 2) commits the City to implement a development mitigation program; and 3) commits the City to implement a development phasing and monitoring program. 5.15-4 Prior to issuance of building permits for new development forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, the property owner/developer shall be required to pay the City of Anaheim for all costs associated with updating the applicable Transportation Model to include the trips associated with their proposed development. This model update will be used to determine and program the extent and phasing of improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. If the model demonstrates that the proposed development will cause an intersection to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS or depending on the location), the property owner/developer shall be responsible for constructing its fair share of necessary improvements to maintain acceptable levels of service for the anticipated theoretical buildout of the General Plan as identified in the City’s Circulation Element and Mitigation Measure 5.15-2. 5.15-5 Prior to issuance of each building permit, appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and TrafficTransportation Impact and Improvement Fees shall be paid by the property owner/developer to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City- authorized improvements provided by the property owner/developer; and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established. 5.15-6 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, and subject to nexus requirements, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate right(s)-of-way as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan adjacent to their property. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 16 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study 5.15-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspection; and, ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer of projects anticipated to employ 250 or more employees shall join and participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network/Transportation Management Association. 6.2 ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MEASURES As stated in section 6.1, according to the results of the ATAM 2012 model, 20 intersections are forecast to operate at LOS E or F in 2035 with the Proposed Project. For these intersections, a preliminary set of additional mitigation measures have been identified. With implementation of these measures, the significant project related or cumulative impacts associated with the Proposed Project would be fully mitigated. Table 6 describes the mitigation measures for those locations. Although every effort was made to ensure that all recommended improvements are physically feasible, there are improvements identified in this study that may not be feasible due to high project costs, the inability to undertake right-of-way acquisitions as a matter of policy to preserve existing businesses, environmental constraints, or jurisdictional considerations. For these improvements, a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be proposed. These reasons are discussed in the following section. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 17 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study TABLE 6 – PROPOSED INTERSECTION MITIGATION Intersection Add Right Turn Lane Add Thru Lane Add Left Turn Lane Override Impacts Comments Euclid St / Lincoln Ave EB Euclid St / Cerritos Ave SB Euclid St / Katella Ave WB YES Restripe WBR to WBT. Disneyland Dr / Ball Rd WB YES Disneyland Dr / Katella Ave WB YES Restripe WBR to WBT. Harbor Blvd / La Palma Ave SB Harbor Blvd / Lincoln Ave EB Harbor Blvd / Ball Rd EB SB NB YES Lemon St / Orangethorpe Ave NB & SB Anaheim Blvd / Vermont Ave EB Haster St / Gene Autry Way EB East St / Lincoln Ave NB Lewis St / Ball Rd NB & EB YES Consider realignment of Lewis St to East St State College Blvd / Katella Ave EB YES State College Blvd / Orangewood Ave NB WB YES Sunkist St/Miraloma Ave / La Palma Ave NB SR-57 SB Ramps / Orangewood Ave EB 2.5 EBT, 1.5 EBR Rio Vista St / Lincoln Ave NB & SB Tustin Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps SB Restripe to 3.5 SBT, 1.5 SBR Fairmont Blvd / La Palma Ave NB & WB The following intersection improvements are likely not feasible due to right-of-way or other constraints. Euclid Street / Katella Avenue—Restripe westbound right turn lane to westbound through lane The improvement at Euclid Street and Katella Avenue is infeasible due to the presence of a large number of existing and newly constructed businesses, which support economic development for the City of Anaheim. The potential right-of-way required for receiving lane on the northwest corner of the intersection would significantly impact businesses and parking on the north side of Katella Avenue. Disneyland Drive / Ball Road—Add westbound right turn lane The improvement is infeasible due to the presence of a large number of Anaheim Resort supportive land uses that contribute to the economic development of the City. In order to accommodate the proposed improvement, the intersection would likely need to be expanded. The City has invested heavily in supporting The Anaheim Resort and altering the street system in ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 18 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study the area would be a cost prohibitive undertaking and disruptive to the effective operation of The Anaheim Resort. Disneyland Drive / West Street / Katella Avenue— Restripe westbound right turn lane to westbound through lane and add 4th westbound lane to the Simba parking lot entrance The improvement is infeasible due to the presence of a large number of immediately adjacent Anaheim Resort supportive land uses that contribute to the economic development of the City. This access to the Disneyland Resort has been significantly reconfigured in recent years to accommodate new development at the parks and adjacent parking areas. The addition of lane capacity at this intersection would require substantial right-of-way and negatively affect the attractive gateway that the Disneyland Resort has created through extensive landscaping. Harbor Boulevard / Ball Road—Add northbound left turn lane, southbound through lane, and eastbound right-turn lane The improvements are infeasible due to the presence of a large number of immediately adjacent Anaheim Resort supportive land uses that contribute to the economic development of the City. To accommodate the proposed improvements, the intersection would have to be substantially expanded impacting the right-of-way of several hotel buildings including the Days Inn Suites and Hotel Menage. Altering the street system in the area would be a cost prohibitive undertaking and disruptive to the effective operation of The Anaheim Resort. Lewis Street / Ball Road—Add northbound right turn lane, eastbound right turn lane The improvement is infeasible due to the presence of a large number of immediately adjacent existing structures, including several industrial and high-density office buildings within close proximity to the public right of way. The additional right-of-way necessary for these improvements would increase the cost of the proposed railroad grade separation on Ball Road immediately west of this intersection, potentially making this railroad safety improvement infeasible. Also, having a northbound dual-right turn lane in close proximity to East Street, a signalized intersection less than 600 feet to the east, would negate much of the operational improvements typically expected from dual right turn lanes. It should be noted that a realignment of Lewis Street eastward to line up with East Street is an improvement that should be considered and studied. Since East Street is clear of the grade separation elevation changes, the cost to realign the street may be significantly less than the cost to implement the identified improvements. State College Boulevard / Katella Avenue—Add eastbound left turn lane The addition of a third eastbound left turn lane will significantly impact a recently developed residential mixed-use development on the northwest corner and a gas station on the southwest corner. This widening will also make Katella Avenue difficult for pedestrians to cross, as with this improvement, pedestrian traffic would have to cross 12 lanes, which is not consistent with the goals of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. State College Boulevard / Orangewood Avenue—Add northbound right turn lane and westbound through lane The improvement is infeasible due to the presence of a large number of immediately adjacent structures, including several high-density office buildings within close proximity to the public right of way. These types of higher density buildings are consistent with the goals of the Platinum Triangle of internal trip capture and promotion of transit use. Additionally, State ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 19 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study College Boulevard is a designated BRT corridor. Improvements to the circulation system in this area should be consistent with the goals of promoting transit use and limiting increased auto trips to this area. All of these intersections have a project related impact under the 2035 General Plan Buildout. As set forth above, there are numerous physical constraints associated with the proposed improvements, including private properties, extensive circulation landscaping and mature trees, and a variety of hotels and other businesses that would likely be impacted. These physical constraints limit the ability to ensure that the improvements necessary to mitigate the project impacts at these locations can be mitigated to less than significant levels. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page 20 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 1 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study APPENDIX A: PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON 2004 APPROVED PROJECT (ATAM 2000) COMPARED TO 2035 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (ATAM 2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 2 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Appendix A – AM Peak Hour LOS Comparison (2004 Approved Project vs. Proposed Project) # Intersection AM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Knott Ave / Lincoln Ave B 0.66 D 0.90 2 Knott Ave / Orange Ave B 0.64 C 0.79 3 Knott Ave / Ball Rd A 0.53 D 0.84 4 Western Ave / Lincoln Ave B 0.62 D 0.83 5 Western Ave / Orange Ave B 0.64 B 0.62 6 Western Ave / Ball Rd B 0.67 C 0.79 7 Beach Blvd / Lincoln Ave D 0.82 D 0.81 8 Beach Blvd / Orange Ave D 0.82 D 0.82 9 Beach Blvd / Ball Rd C 0.78 C 0.74 10 Beach Blvd / Cerritos Ave D 0.86 C 0.79 11 Dale Ave / Lincoln Ave B 0.70 C 0.71 12 Dale Ave / Broadway A 0.31 A 0.53 13 Dale Ave / Orange Ave A 0.49 C 0.72 14 Dale Ave / Ball Rd A 0.54 B 0.63 15 Dale Ave / Cerritos Ave A 0.53 A 0.50 16 Magnolia St / La Palma Ave A 0.53 C 0.76 17 Magnolia St / Crescent Ave A 0.50 B 0.66 18 Magnolia St / Lincoln Ave A 0.52 C 0.78 19 Magnolia St / Broadway A 0.53 B 0.64 20 Magnolia St / Orange Ave A 0.52 C 0.77 21 Magnolia St / Ball Rd A 0.54 B 0.69 22 Magnolia St / Cerritos Ave B 0.69 A 0.48 23 Gilbert St / La Palma Ave A 0.42 B 0.63 24 Gilbert St / Crescent Ave A 0.31 A 0.51 25 Gilbert St / Lincoln Ave A 0.43 A 0.59 26 Gilbert St / Broadway A 0.38 A 0.42 27 Gilbert St / Orange Ave A 0.44 A 0.36 28 Gilbert St / Ball Rd A 0.42 B 0.63 29 Gilbert St / Cerritos Ave A 0.53 A 0.42 30 Brookhurst St / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.64 C 0.77 31 Brookhurst St / SR-91 EB Ramps B 0.69 D 0.81 32 Brookhurst St / La Palma Ave A 0.54 C 0.78 33 Brookhurst St / I-5 SB Ramps B 0.64 C 0.71 34 Brookhurst St / Crescent Ave C 0.73 C 0.71 35 Brookhurst St / Lincoln Ave B 0.65 C 0.78 36 Brookhurst St / Broadway A 0.60 B 0.66 37 Brookhurst St / Orange Ave A 0.56 A 0.49 38 Brookhurst St / Ball Rd A 0.60 B 0.66 39 Brookhurst St / Cerritos Ave A 0.59 D 0.84 40 Brookhurst St / Katella Ave D 0.88 D 0.87 41 Nutwood St / Ball Rd A 0.37 A 0.55 42 Nutwood St / Cerritos Ave A 0.47 B 0.61 43 Nutwood St / Katella Ave C 0.76 C 0.71 44 Crescent Way / Lincoln Ave A 0.53 B 0.65 45 Euclid St / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.63 B 0.62 46 Euclid St / SR-91 EB Ramps C 0.79 B 0.65 47 Euclid St / Romneya Dr A 0.53 C 0.74 48 Euclid St / La Palma Ave B 0.67 B 0.67 49 Euclid St / Crescent Ave B 0.69 C 0.80 50 Euclid St / Anaheim Shopping Center A 0.54 B 0.66 51 Euclid St / I-5 NB and SB Ramps A 0.51 C 0.74 52 Euclid St / Lincoln Ave B 0.66 E 0.91 53 Euclid St / Broadway C 0.72 D 0.83 54 Euclid St / Orange Ave A 0.41 A 0.55 55 Euclid St / Ball Rd A 0.45 C 0.75 56 Euclid St / Cerritos Ave B 0.71 E 0.92 57 Euclid St / Katella Ave B 0.71 D 0.87 58 Loara St / Crescent Ave A 0.29 B 0.61 59 Loara St / Lincoln Ave A 0.49 D 0.90 60 Loara St / Broadway A 0.43 B 0.62 61 Walnut St / Ball Rd A 0.41 D 0.88 62 Walnut St / Cerritos Ave A 0.46 C 0.72 63 Walnut St / Katella Ave D 0.90 C 0.77 64 I-5 SB Ramps / Lincoln Ave A 0.37 B 0.61 65 I-5 NB Ramps / Lincoln Ave A 0.26 C 0.72 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 3 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study # Intersection AM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 66 Manchester Ave / Broadway A 0.60 B 0.65 67 West St / La Palma Ave A 0.41 A 0.49 68 West St / Lincoln Ave A 0.56 B 0.62 69 West St / Broadway A 0.54 A 0.53 70 Manchester / I-5 SB Ramps A 0.52 A 0.52 71 Disneyland Dr / Ball Rd C 0.76 D 0.87 72 Disneyland Dr / Magic Way A 0.47 A 0.45 73 Disneyland Dr / Paradise A 0.29 A 0.30 74 Disneyland Dr / Simba A 0.40 A 0.52 75 Disneyland Dr / Katella Ave A 0.59 D 0.86 76 West St / Convention Way A 0.17 A 0.37 77 Ox Rd / Ball Rd B 0.64 B 0.68 78 Convention Center / Katella Ave A 0.55 A 0.55 79 Citron St / La Palma Ave A 0.41 A 0.48 80 Citron St / Lincoln Ave A 0.48 A 0.48 81 Citron St / Broadway A 0.42 A 0.42 82 Harbor Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps A 0.54 A 0.56 83 Harbor Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps A 0.58 A 0.58 84 Harbor Blvd / Romneya Dr B 0.61 C 0.74 85 Harbor Blvd / La Palma Ave B 0.61 D 0.83 86 Harbor Blvd / North St A 0.50 C 0.76 87 Harbor Blvd / Sycamore St A 0.49 C 0.75 88 Harbor Blvd / Lincoln Ave D 0.84 E 0.92 89 Harbor Blvd / Broadway B 0.65 D 0.84 90 Harbor Blvd / Santa Ana St A 0.51 D 0.89 91 Harbor Blvd / South St A 0.60 B 0.70 92 Harbor Blvd / Vermont Ave A 0.60 C 0.78 93 Harbor Blvd / Ball Rd E 0.97 F 1.10 94 Harbor Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps A 0.56 D 0.87 95 Harbor Blvd / I-5 SB Ramps C 0.71 A 0.59 96 Harbor Blvd / Manchester Ave A 0.38 D 0.90 97 Harbor Blvd / East Shuttle Area A 0.55 A 0.43 98 Harbor Blvd / Disney Way A 0.43 A 0.40 99 Harbor Blvd / Katella Ave C 0.78 C 0.80 100 Harbor Blvd / Convention Way A 0.59 C 0.74 101 Harbor Blvd / Orangewood Ave D 0.82 C 0.73 102 Harbor Blvd / Chapman Ave A 0.53 B 0.63 103 Anaheim Blvd / Lemon St / La Palma Ave A 0.54 B 0.66 104 Lemon St / Lincoln Ave A 0.36 A 0.40 105 Lemon St / Ball Rd A 0.42 A 0.51 106 Clementine St / Disney Way A 0.22 A 0.57 107 Clementine St / Katella Ave A 0.59 B 0.65 108 I-5 SB Off Ramp / Disney Way A 0.26 A 0.47 109 Lemon St/Anaheim Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps A 0.60 C 0.71 110 Lemon St/Anaheim Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps B 0.66 B 0.62 111 Anaheim Blvd / La Palma Ave A 0.37 C 0.71 112 Anaheim Blvd / North St A 0.38 A 0.59 113 Anaheim Blvd / Sycamore St A 0.51 A 0.54 114 Anaheim Blvd / Lincoln Ave B 0.61 B 0.69 115 Anaheim Blvd / Broadway B 0.64 C 0.77 116 Anaheim Blvd / Santa Ana St A 0.46 B 0.66 117 Anaheim Blvd / South St A 0.57 C 0.79 118 Anaheim Blvd / Vermont Ave B 0.65 F 1.04 119 Anaheim Blvd / Ball Rd A 0.59 C 0.74 120 Anaheim Blvd / Cerritos Ave A 0.50 C 0.74 121 Anaheim Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps A 0.52 A 0.50 122 Anaheim Blvd / Disney Way A 0.36 B 0.61 123 Anaheim Blvd / Katella Ave C 0.78 D 0.90 124 Haster St / Orangewood Ave A 0.43 C 0.79 125 Manchester Ave/I-5 SB Ramps / Katella Ave F 1.06 D 0.83 126 Anaheim Way/I-5 NB Ramps / Katella Ave A 0.58 D 0.90 127 Olive St / La Palma Ave A 0.31 A 0.51 128 Olive St / Lincoln Ave A 0.39 A 0.50 129 Raymond Ave / Orangethorpe Ave C 0.74 B 0.68 130 East St/Raymond Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.65 B 0.67 131 East St / SR-91 EB Ramps B 0.64 B 0.68 132 East St / Romneya Dr A 0.36 A 0.45 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 4 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study # Intersection AM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 133 East St / La Palma Ave A 0.57 D 0.82 134 East St / Sycamore St A 0.55 B 0.69 135 East St / Lincoln Ave B 0.66 D 0.84 136 East St / Broadway A 0.51 D 0.87 137 East St / Santa Ana St A 0.42 A 0.60 138 East St / South St A 0.54 C 0.78 139 East St / Vermont Ave B 0.66 C 0.79 140 East St / Ball Rd B 0.68 D 0.81 141 Lewis St / Ball Rd A 0.46 C 0.72 142 Lewis St / Cerritos Ave A 0.42 D 0.88 143 Lewis St / Katella Ave A 0.49 D 0.81 144 Manchester Ave / Orangewood Ave D 0.83 D 0.89 145 Anaheim Way / Orangewood Ave A 0.15 A 0.50 146 Acacia St / La Palma Ave A 0.28 C 0.77 147 State College Blvd / Orangethorpe Ave C 0.75 C 0.75 148 State College Blvd / Via Burton St A 0.59 A 0.59 149 State College Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps A 0.53 A 0.59 150 State College Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps B 0.65 A 0.54 151 State College Blvd / Romneya Dr B 0.66 B 0.61 152 State College Blvd / La Palma Ave B 0.63 B 0.70 153 State College Blvd / Lincoln Ave C 0.78 C 0.80 154 State College Blvd / Santa Ana St A 0.52 A 0.41 155 State College Blvd / South St A 0.55 C 0.71 156 State College Blvd / Vermont Ave A 0.58 B 0.65 157 State College Blvd / Ball Rd B 0.64 D 0.87 158 State College Blvd / Winston Rd A 0.59 A 0.57 159 State College Blvd / Cerritos Ave B 0.69 C 0.74 160 State College Blvd / Katella Ave D 0.82 D 0.89 161 State College / Sportstown A 0.58 C 0.73 162 State College Blvd / Gene Autry Way C 0.77 B 0.70 163 State College Blvd / Orangewood Ave D 0.86 D 0.82 164 Peregrine St / Lincoln Ave A 0.52 A 0.57 165 Sunkist St / Miraloma Ave / La Palma Ave A 0.57 C 0.80 166 Sunkist St / Lincoln Ave B 0.61 D 0.85 167 Sunkist St / South St B 0.69 C 0.72 168 Sunkist St / Ball Rd C 0.73 D 0.89 169 Sunkist St / Cerritos Ave B 0.64 D 0.83 170 Howell Ave / Katella Ave B 0.62 D 0.86 171 Sportstown / Katella Ave A 0.48 D 0.82 172 Rampart St / Orangewood Ave A 0.51 B 0.69 173 SR-57 SB Ramps / Lincoln Ave B 0.64 B 0.69 174 SR-57 NB Ramps / Lincoln Ave A 0.48 A 0.55 175 SR-57 SB Ramps / Ball Rd B 0.62 D 0.82 176 SR-57 NB Ramps / Ball Rd B 0.66 C 0.76 177 SR-57 SB Ramps / Katella Ave A 0.47 D 0.85 178 SR-57 NB Ramps / Katella Ave A 0.48 B 0.69 179 SR-57 SB Ramps / Orangewood Ave A 0.56 D 0.87 180 SR-57 NB Ramps / Orangewood Ave A 0.44 B 0.64 181 Rio Vista St / Lincoln Ave B 0.70 E 0.94 182 Phoenix Club Dr / Ball Rd A 0.58 D 0.83 183 Douglass Rd / Katella Ave D 0.90 D 0.82 184 Blue Gum St / Miraloma Ave A 0.45 A 0.43 185 Blue Gum St / La Palma Ave A 0.45 A 0.60 186 Red Gum St / Miraloma Ave A 0.18 A 0.26 187 Red Gum St / La Palma Ave A 0.34 A 0.38 188 Kraemer Blvd / Crowther Ave A 0.58 D 0.84 189 Kraemer Blvd / Orangethorpe Ave C 0.79 D 0.85 190 Kraemer Blvd / Miraloma Ave A 0.52 D 0.81 191 Kraemer Blvd / La Palma Ave D 0.82 D 0.81 192 Kraemer Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.62 B 0.66 193 Kraemer Blvd / Frontera St B 0.65 D 0.82 194 Miller St / Orangethorpe Ave A 0.42 A 0.41 195 Miller St / Miraloma St A 0.40 B 0.61 196 Miller St / La Palma Ave A 0.39 B 0.64 197 Orangethorpe Ave / Tustin Connector D 0.89 B 0.64 198 Tustin Ave / Miraloma Ave C 0.74 D 0.83 199 Tustin Ave / La Palma Ave F 1.01 D 0.87 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 5 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study # Intersection AM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 200 Tustin Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps C 0.79 E 0.96 201 Tustin Ave / SR-91 EB Ramps F 1.22 D 0.81 202 Tustin Ave / Riverdale Ave C 0.76 C 0.71 203 Van Buren St / La Palma Ave A 0.46 A 0.53 204 Orangethorpe Ave / Lakeview Connector A 0.49 A 0.52 205 Lakeview Ave / La Palma Ave A 0.50 B 0.66 206 Lakeview Ave / Riverdale Ave B 0.64 B 0.66 207 Lakeview Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.67 C 0.73 208 Lakeview Ave / Santa Ana Canyon Rd C 0.80 D 0.84 209 Lakeview Ave / SR-91 EB Off Ramp A 0.50 A 0.58 210 Meats Ave / Nohl Ranch Rd A 0.60 A 0.54 211 Kellogg Dr / Orangethorpe Ave A 0.56 B 0.66 212 Kellogg Dr / Orangethorpe Ave A 0.46 C 0.77 213 Kellogg Dr / La Palma Ave A 0.46 A 0.59 214 Royal Oak Rd/Pinney Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.46 B 0.69 215 Royal Oak Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd B 0.64 A 0.50 216 Corporate Cont / La Palma A 0.34 A 0.35 217 Cinema City / La Palma Ave A 0.42 A 0.40 218 Avenida Margarita / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.36 A 0.46 219 Imperial Hwy / Orangethorpe Connector B 0.63 A 0.54 220 Imperial Hwy / La Palma Ave D 0.88 D 0.83 221 Imperial Hwy / SR-91 WB Ramps C 0.73 B 0.62 222 Imperial Hwy / SR-91 EB Ramps E 0.93 C 0.76 223 Imperial Hwy / Santa Ana Canyon Rd E 0.91 D 0.85 224 Imperial Hwy / Ave Bernardo N A 0.60 C 0.71 225 Imperial Hwy / Nohl Ranch Rd D 0.86 D 0.83 226 Imperial Hwy / Big Sky Ln/River Valley Trail A 0.58 B 0.64 227 Chrisden St / La Palma Ave A 0.42 A 0.40 228 Via Cortez / Santa Ana Canyon Rd B 0.62 B 0.64 229 Fairmont Blvd / La Palma Ave A 0.52 C 0.76 230 Anaheim Hills Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.58 D 0.84 231 Anaheim Hills Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd C 0.71 B 0.63 232 Canyon Rim Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd A 0.52 A 0.50 233 Fairmont Blvd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.43 B 0.62 234 Mohler Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.41 A 0.58 235 Festival Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.33 A 0.29 236 Roosevelt Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.32 A 0.38 237 Weir Canyon Rd / La Palma Ave C 0.79 C 0.75 238 Weir Canyon Rd / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.63 B 0.68 239 Weir Canyon Rd / SR-91 EB Ramps B 0.66 C 0.73 240 Weir Canyon Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd C 0.76 C 0.78 241 Weir Canyon Rd / Monte Vista Rd A 0.57 A 0.51 242 Weir Canyon Rd / Serrano Ave C 0.72 C 0.74 243 Weir Canyon Rd / Oak Canyon Dr A 0.28 A 0.28 244 Serrano Ave / Oak Canyon Dr A 0.46 A 0.48 245 Serrano Ave / Canyon Rim Rd A 0.40 A 0.50 246 Serrano Ave / Nohl Ranch Rd A 0.40 A 0.48 247 Placentia Ave / Orangethorpe Ave A 0.51 A 0.57 248 Romneya Dr / La Palma Ave A 0.32 A 0.50 249 Loara St / Ball Rd A 0.45 C 0.71 250 Ninth St / Katella Ave A 0.56 C 0.78 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 6 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Appendix A – PM Peak Hour LOS Comparison (2004 Approved Project vs. Proposed Project) # Intersection PM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Knott Ave / Lincoln Ave D 0.83 D 0.87 2 Knott Ave / Orange Ave C 0.78 C 0.73 3 Knott Ave / Ball Rd C 0.73 D 0.87 4 Western Ave / Lincoln Ave C 0.71 D 0.82 5 Western Ave / Orange Ave B 0.69 A 0.59 6 Western Ave / Ball Rd B 0.70 C 0.80 7 Beach Blvd / Lincoln Ave E 0.93 D 0.89 8 Beach Blvd / Orange Ave D 0.84 C 0.75 9 Beach Blvd / Ball Rd C 0.75 D 0.82 10 Beach Blvd / Cerritos Ave C 0.79 C 0.78 11 Dale Ave / Lincoln Ave E 0.95 D 0.81 12 Dale Ave / Broadway A 0.49 A 0.59 13 Dale Ave / Orange Ave A 0.55 A 0.59 14 Dale Ave / Ball Rd B 0.63 C 0.72 15 Dale Ave / Cerritos Ave B 0.61 A 0.53 16 Magnolia St / La Palma Ave C 0.75 C 0.77 17 Magnolia St / Crescent Ave B 0.63 D 0.87 18 Magnolia St / Lincoln Ave C 0.73 C 0.77 19 Magnolia St / Broadway A 0.60 B 0.62 20 Magnolia St / Orange Ave B 0.63 D 0.90 21 Magnolia St / Ball Rd C 0.73 C 0.74 22 Magnolia St / Cerritos Ave C 0.78 A 0.60 23 Gilbert St / La Palma Ave A 0.47 A 0.58 24 Gilbert St / Crescent Ave A 0.33 A 0.43 25 Gilbert St / Lincoln Ave B 0.63 B 0.66 26 Gilbert St / Broadway A 0.52 A 0.53 27 Gilbert St / Orange Ave B 0.61 A 0.46 28 Gilbert St / Ball Rd A 0.56 B 0.68 29 Gilbert St / Cerritos Ave A 0.56 A 0.44 30 Brookhurst St / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.66 B 0.68 31 Brookhurst St / SR-91 EB Ramps C 0.78 C 0.77 32 Brookhurst St / La Palma Ave B 0.68 D 0.81 33 Brookhurst St / I-5 SB Ramps C 0.71 D 0.84 34 Brookhurst St / Crescent Ave C 0.72 C 0.76 35 Brookhurst St / Lincoln Ave B 0.70 D 0.81 36 Brookhurst St / Broadway B 0.67 C 0.76 37 Brookhurst St / Orange Ave B 0.66 A 0.58 38 Brookhurst St / Ball Rd C 0.73 D 0.81 39 Brookhurst St / Cerritos Ave B 0.63 D 0.83 40 Brookhurst St / Katella Ave D 0.85 D 0.89 41 Nutwood St / Ball Rd A 0.46 A 0.60 42 Nutwood St / Cerritos Ave A 0.49 A 0.54 43 Nutwood St / Katella Ave C 0.76 B 0.70 44 Crescent Way / Lincoln Ave A 0.56 B 0.65 45 Euclid St / SR-91 WB Ramps D 0.84 D 0.85 46 Euclid St / SR-91 EB Ramps C 0.71 B 0.65 47 Euclid St / Romneya Dr A 0.59 C 0.73 48 Euclid St / La Palma Ave D 0.87 C 0.79 49 Euclid St / Crescent Ave D 0.83 D 0.87 50 Euclid St / Anaheim Shopping Center B 0.68 B 0.69 51 Euclid St / I-5 NB and SB Ramps C 0.76 D 0.85 52 Euclid St / Lincoln Ave C 0.78 D 0.87 53 Euclid St / Broadway C 0.78 D 0.84 54 Euclid St / Orange Ave A 0.49 A 0.51 55 Euclid St / Ball Rd B 0.63 C 0.79 56 Euclid St / Cerritos Ave C 0.73 E 0.96 57 Euclid St / Katella Ave E 0.91 E 0.91 58 Loara St / Crescent Ave B 0.65 B 0.69 59 Loara St / Lincoln Ave A 0.54 B 0.65 60 Loara St / Broadway A 0.49 B 0.65 61 Walnut St / Ball Rd A 0.45 D 0.82 62 Walnut St / Cerritos Ave A 0.47 C 0.78 63 Walnut St / Katella Ave B 0.61 C 0.77 64 I-5 SB Ramps / Lincoln Ave A 0.48 D 0.82 65 I-5 NB Ramps / Lincoln Ave A 0.44 D 0.88 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 7 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study # Intersection PM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 66 Manchester Ave / Broadway A 0.57 B 0.65 67 West St / La Palma Ave A 0.54 A 0.52 68 West St / Lincoln Ave B 0.68 B 0.66 69 West St / Broadway A 0.52 A 0.54 70 Manchester / I-5 SB Ramps A 0.31 A 0.35 71 Disneyland Dr / Ball Rd B 0.68 E 0.92 72 Disneyland Dr / Magic Way A 0.59 A 0.55 73 Disneyland Dr / Paradise A 0.38 A 0.37 74 Disneyland Dr / Simba A 0.33 B 0.70 75 Disneyland Dr / Katella Ave C 0.79 E 0.95 76 West St / Convention Way A 0.30 A 0.35 77 Ox Rd / Ball Rd C 0.74 C 0.76 78 Convention Center / Katella Ave A 0.57 B 0.65 79 Citron St / La Palma Ave A 0.38 A 0.50 80 Citron St / Lincoln Ave A 0.52 A 0.51 81 Citron St / Broadway A 0.49 A 0.46 82 Harbor Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps C 0.71 C 0.77 83 Harbor Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps B 0.63 B 0.64 84 Harbor Blvd / Romneya Dr C 0.71 B 0.67 85 Harbor Blvd / La Palma Ave C 0.77 E 0.96 86 Harbor Blvd / North St A 0.49 B 0.66 87 Harbor Blvd / Sycamore St A 0.38 B 0.68 88 Harbor Blvd / Lincoln Ave D 0.90 D 0.88 89 Harbor Blvd / Broadway B 0.67 D 0.86 90 Harbor Blvd / Santa Ana St A 0.58 C 0.77 91 Harbor Blvd / South St A 0.56 C 0.72 92 Harbor Blvd / Vermont Ave B 0.65 B 0.70 93 Harbor Blvd / Ball Rd F 1.12 F 1.11 94 Harbor Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps C 0.74 D 0.85 95 Harbor Blvd / I-5 SB Ramps B 0.63 A 0.42 96 Harbor Blvd / Manchester Ave A 0.57 A 0.59 97 Harbor Blvd / East Shuttle Area A 0.56 A 0.37 98 Harbor Blvd / Disney Way A 0.56 A 0.43 99 Harbor Blvd / Katella Ave E 0.96 D 0.89 100 Harbor Blvd / Convention Way D 0.82 C 0.73 101 Harbor Blvd / Orangewood Ave E 0.96 D 0.85 102 Harbor Blvd / Chapman Ave B 0.69 C 0.75 103 Anaheim Blvd / Lemon St / La Palma Ave A 0.48 C 0.78 104 Lemon St / Lincoln Ave A 0.47 A 0.45 105 Lemon St / Ball Rd A 0.39 A 0.47 106 Clementine St / Disney Way A 0.27 A 0.57 107 Clementine St / Katella Ave B 0.63 D 0.82 108 I-5 SB Off Ramp / Disney Way A 0.25 A 0.44 109 Lemon St/Anaheim Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.62 C 0.77 110 Lemon St/Anaheim Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps C 0.73 C 0.71 111 Anaheim Blvd / La Palma Ave B 0.68 D 0.85 112 Anaheim Blvd / North St A 0.46 B 0.67 113 Anaheim Blvd / Sycamore St A 0.52 B 0.65 114 Anaheim Blvd / Lincoln Ave B 0.70 C 0.77 115 Anaheim Blvd / Broadway C 0.79 D 0.83 116 Anaheim Blvd / Santa Ana St A 0.58 C 0.77 117 Anaheim Blvd / South St C 0.79 D 0.81 118 Anaheim Blvd / Vermont Ave B 0.63 D 0.85 119 Anaheim Blvd / Ball Rd D 0.81 D 0.89 120 Anaheim Blvd / Cerritos Ave C 0.73 D 0.89 121 Anaheim Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps C 0.76 D 0.83 122 Anaheim Blvd / Disney Way A 0.48 D 0.85 123 Anaheim Blvd / Katella Ave D 0.87 D 0.89 124 Haster St / Orangewood Ave C 0.74 C 0.75 125 Manchester Ave/I-5 SB Ramps / Katella Ave E 0.98 C 0.73 126 Anaheim Way/I-5 NB Ramps / Katella Ave B 0.68 D 0.86 127 Olive St / La Palma Ave A 0.40 A 0.48 128 Olive St / Lincoln Ave A 0.48 A 0.50 129 Raymond Ave / Orangethorpe Ave E 0.93 D 0.86 130 East St/Raymond Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps C 0.80 C 0.71 131 East St / SR-91 EB Ramps C 0.76 C 0.80 132 East St / Romneya Dr A 0.43 B 0.62 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 8 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study # Intersection PM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 133 East St / La Palma Ave B 0.69 D 0.81 134 East St / Sycamore St A 0.57 B 0.65 135 East St / Lincoln Ave E 0.94 E 0.91 136 East St / Broadway A 0.50 C 0.74 137 East St / Santa Ana St A 0.42 A 0.59 138 East St / South St A 0.41 C 0.71 139 East St / Vermont Ave A 0.49 C 0.79 140 East St / Ball Rd B 0.66 C 0.79 141 Lewis St / Ball Rd B 0.68 E 0.97 142 Lewis St / Cerritos Ave A 0.54 C 0.78 143 Lewis St / Katella Ave B 0.64 D 0.81 144 Manchester Ave / Orangewood Ave B 0.61 C 0.80 145 Anaheim Way / Orangewood Ave A 0.34 B 0.68 146 Acacia St / La Palma Ave A 0.37 A 0.56 147 State College Blvd / Orangethorpe Ave C 0.78 C 0.74 148 State College Blvd / Via Burton St C 0.79 B 0.65 149 State College Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.68 C 0.73 150 State College Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps B 0.63 B 0.62 151 State College Blvd / Romneya Dr D 0.86 C 0.74 152 State College Blvd / La Palma Ave C 0.76 D 0.81 153 State College Blvd / Lincoln Ave D 0.82 C 0.80 154 State College Blvd / Santa Ana St A 0.56 A 0.46 155 State College Blvd / South St A 0.52 B 0.67 156 State College Blvd / Vermont Ave A 0.57 A 0.50 157 State College Blvd / Ball Rd C 0.77 D 0.84 158 State College Blvd / Winston Rd B 0.66 B 0.61 159 State College Blvd / Cerritos Ave B 0.61 C 0.71 160 State College Blvd / Katella Ave D 0.90 E 0.95 161 State College Blvd / Sportstown A 0.55 D 0.82 162 State College Blvd / Gene Autry Way A 0.41 D 0.86 163 State College Blvd / Orangewood Ave C 0.73 F 1.05 164 Peregrine St / Lincoln Ave B 0.62 A 0.58 165 Sunkist St / Miraloma Ave / La Palma Ave C 0.75 E 0.91 166 Sunkist St / Lincoln Ave C 0.76 D 0.82 167 Sunkist St / South St A 0.56 B 0.67 168 Sunkist St / Ball Rd D 0.84 D 0.85 169 Sunkist St / Cerritos Ave B 0.66 D 0.88 170 Howell Ave / Katella Ave D 0.87 D 0.83 171 Sportstown / Katella Ave C 0.74 D 0.90 172 Rampart St / Orangewood Ave A 0.60 D 0.85 173 SR-57 SB Ramps / Lincoln Ave A 0.58 B 0.63 174 SR-57 NB Ramps / Lincoln Ave B 0.67 B 0.69 175 SR-57 SB Ramps / Ball Rd B 0.62 B 0.64 176 SR-57 NB Ramps / Ball Rd C 0.77 C 0.80 177 SR-57 SB Ramps / Katella Ave B 0.69 C 0.75 178 SR-57 NB Ramps / Katella Ave B 0.69 B 0.70 179 SR-57 SB Ramps / Orangewood Ave C 0.76 E 0.91 180 SR-57 NB Ramps / Orangewood Ave A 0.47 B 0.69 181 Rio Vista St / Lincoln Ave D 0.87 D 0.86 182 Phoenix Club Dr / Ball Rd B 0.68 D 0.88 183 Douglass Rd / Katella Ave F 1.12 C 0.78 184 Blue Gum St / Miraloma Ave A 0.48 B 0.62 185 Blue Gum St / La Palma Ave A 0.58 C 0.79 186 Red Gum St / Miraloma Ave A 0.24 A 0.30 187 Red Gum St / La Palma Ave A 0.42 A 0.53 188 Kraemer Blvd / Crowther Ave B 0.65 B 0.68 189 Kraemer Blvd / Orangethorpe Ave D 0.84 C 0.80 190 Kraemer Blvd / Miraloma Ave B 0.68 D 0.89 191 Kraemer Blvd / La Palma Ave E 0.97 D 0.84 192 Kraemer Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps A 0.58 B 0.70 193 Kraemer Blvd / Frontera St B 0.67 B 0.69 194 Miller St / Orangethorpe Ave A 0.48 A 0.50 195 Miller St / Miraloma St A 0.29 A 0.56 196 Miller St / La Palma Ave A 0.50 C 0.73 197 Orangethorpe Ave / Tustin Connector C 0.80 B 0.62 198 Tustin Ave / Miraloma Ave B 0.67 D 0.87 199 Tustin Ave / La Palma Ave C 0.77 D 0.88 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 9 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study # Intersection PM Peak Hour 2004 Approved Project (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout (ATAM 2012) ICU LOS ICU LOS 200 Tustin Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps D 0.85 D 0.90 201 Tustin Ave / SR-91 EB Ramps E 0.98 D 0.81 202 Tustin Ave / Riverdale Ave D 0.88 D 0.81 203 Van Buren St / La Palma Ave A 0.56 A 0.60 204 Orangethorpe Ave / Lakeview Connector B 0.67 A 0.47 205 Lakeview Ave / La Palma Ave A 0.55 D 0.82 206 Lakeview Ave / Riverdale Ave D 0.84 D 0.83 207 Lakeview Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps B 0.66 A 0.57 208 Lakeview Ave / Santa Ana Canyon Rd C 0.71 C 0.77 209 Lakeview Ave / SR-91 EB Off Ramp A 0.58 A 0.45 210 Meats Ave / Nohl Ranch Rd A 0.29 A 0.32 211 Kellogg Dr / Orangethorpe Ave A 0.58 C 0.72 212 Kellogg Dr / Orangethorpe Ave B 0.67 B 0.69 213 Kellogg Dr / La Palma Ave A 0.50 B 0.62 214 Royal Oak Rd/Pinney Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.60 A 0.49 215 Royal Oak Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd A 0.36 A 0.31 216 Corporate Cont / La Palma A 0.37 A 0.41 217 Cinema City / La Palma Ave A 0.57 A 0.47 218 Avenida Margarita / Santa Ana Canyon Rd B 0.63 A 0.54 219 Imperial Hwy / Orangethorpe Connector E 0.94 A 0.50 220 Imperial Hwy / La Palma Ave E 0.95 D 0.82 221 Imperial Hwy / SR-91 WB Ramps C 0.72 B 0.67 222 Imperial Hwy / SR-91 EB Ramps C 0.76 C 0.79 223 Imperial Hwy / Santa Ana Canyon Rd F 1.01 D 0.85 224 Imperial Hwy / Ave Bernardo N A 0.49 A 0.55 225 Imperial Hwy / Nohl Ranch Rd E 0.95 C 0.79 226 Imperial Hwy / Big Sky Ln/River Valley Trail A 0.49 A 0.49 227 Chrisden St / La Palma Ave A 0.54 B 0.61 228 Via Cortez / Santa Ana Canyon Rd B 0.67 D 0.84 229 Fairmont Blvd / La Palma Ave A 0.58 E 0.99 230 Anaheim Hills Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd C 0.76 D 0.86 231 Anaheim Hills Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd B 0.66 A 0.57 232 Canyon Rim Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd A 0.56 A 0.54 233 Fairmont Blvd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.57 B 0.69 234 Mohler Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.51 A 0.60 235 Festival Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.43 A 0.42 236 Roosevelt Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd A 0.53 C 0.71 237 Weir Canyon Rd / La Palma Ave D 0.84 D 0.85 238 Weir Canyon Rd / SR-91 WB Ramps C 0.78 B 0.70 239 Weir Canyon Rd / SR-91 EB Ramps E 0.92 D 0.89 240 Weir Canyon Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd E 0.96 C 0.79 241 Weir Canyon Rd / Monte Vista Rd C 0.75 C 0.76 242 Weir Canyon Rd / Serrano Ave C 0.73 A 0.48 243 Weir Canyon Rd / Oak Canyon Dr A 0.36 A 0.26 244 Serrano Ave / Oak Canyon Dr A 0.58 A 0.37 245 Serrano Ave / Canyon Rim Rd A 0.45 A 0.37 246 Serrano Ave / Nohl Ranch Rd A 0.33 A 0.30 247 Placentia Ave / Orangethorpe Ave A 0.60 B 0.64 248 Romneya Dr / La Palma Ave A 0.57 A 0.56 249 Loara St / Ball Rd A 0.52 C 0.76 250 Ninth St / Katella Ave A 0.55 C 0.61 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 10 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 11 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study APPENDIX B: CITY OF ANAHEIM FUTURE 2035 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT PEAK HOUR LOS SUMMARY (ATAM 2012) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 12 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Appendix B – Future 2035 (ATAM 2012) Peak Hour LOS Summary Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Knott Ave / Lincoln Ave 0.90 D 0.87 D 2 Knott Ave / Danbrook Ave 0.34 A 0.36 A 3 Knott Ave / Orange Ave 0.79 C 0.73 C 4 Knott Ave / Savanna St 0.48 A 0.39 A 5 Knott Ave / Ball Rd 0.84 D 0.87 D 6 Knott Ave / Cerritos Ave 0.75 C 0.75 C 7 Western Ave / Lincoln Ave 0.83 D 0.82 D 8 Western Ave / Orange Ave 0.62 B 0.59 A 9 Western Ave / Ball Rd 0.79 C 0.80 C 10 Western Ave / Cerritos Ave 0.72 C 0.64 B 11 Grand Ave / Lincoln Ave 0.48 A 0.55 A 12 Beach Blvd / Anacapa Way 0.55 A 0.57 A 13 Beach Blvd / Lincoln Ave 0.81 D 0.89 D 14 Beach Blvd / Youth Center 0.52 A 0.50 A 15 Beach Blvd / Orange Ave 0.82 D 0.75 C 16 Beach Blvd / Ball Rd 0.74 C 0.82 D 17 Beach Blvd / Cerritos Ave 0.79 C 0.78 C 18 Laxore St / Lincoln Ave 0.48 A 0.50 A 19 Gaymont St / Ball Rd 0.47 A 0.46 A 20 Dale Ave / Crescent Ave 0.67 B 0.61 B 21 Dale Ave / Lincoln Ave 0.71 C 0.81 D 22 Dale Ave / Broadway 0.53 A 0.59 A 23 Dale Ave / Orange Ave 0.72 C 0.59 A 24 Dale Ave / Ball Rd 0.63 B 0.72 C 25 Dale Ave / Cerritos Ave 0.50 A 0.53 A 26 Magnolia St / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.85 D 0.68 B 27 Magnolia St / I-5 NB Off-Ramp/Buckingham St 0.87 D 0.85 D 28 Magnolia St / SR-91 EB / I-5 SB Ramps 0.71 C 0.54 A 29 Magnolia St / Northgate 0.48 A 0.47 A 30 Magnolia St / Woodland Dr 0.65 B 0.60 A 31 Magnolia St / La Palma Ave 0.76 C 0.77 C 32 Magnolia St / Greenleaf Ave 0.39 A 0.36 A 33 Magnolia St / Crescent Ave 0.66 B 0.87 D 34 Magnolia St / Lincoln Ave 0.78 C 0.77 C 35 Magnolia St / Broadway 0.64 B 0.62 B 36 Magnolia St / Orange Ave 0.77 C 0.90 D 37 Magnolia St / Ball Rd 0.69 B 0.74 C 38 Magnolia St / Cerritos Ave 0.48 A 0.60 A 39 Woodland Dr / La Palma Ave 0.33 A 0.56 A 40 Webster St / Ball Rd 0.49 A 0.49 A 41 Gilbert St / La Palma Ave 0.63 B 0.58 A 42 Gilbert St / Crescent Ave 0.51 A 0.43 A 43 Gilbert St / Lincoln Ave 0.59 A 0.66 B 44 Gilbert St / Broadway 0.42 A 0.53 A 45 Gilbert St / Orange Ave 0.36 A 0.46 A 46 Gilbert St / Ball Rd 0.63 B 0.68 B 47 Gilbert St / Cerritos Ave 0.42 A 0.44 A 48 Gilbert St / Katella Ave 0.70 B 0.77 C 49 Belinda Cir / Lincoln Ave 0.41 A 0.54 A 50 Monterey St / Lincoln Ave 0.43 A 0.41 A 51 Perdido St / Ball Rd 0.48 A 0.48 A 52 Brookhurst St / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.77 C 0.68 B 53 Brookhurst St / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.81 D 0.77 C 54 Brookhurst St / Huntington Ave 0.88 D 0.58 A 55 Brookhurst St / Falmouth Ave 0.67 B 0.58 A 56 Brookhurst St / La Palma Ave 0.78 C 0.81 D 57 Brookhurst St / I-5 SB Ramps 0.71 C 0.84 D 58 Brookhurst St / Sequoia Ave 0.59 A 0.52 A 59 Brookhurst St / Crescent Ave 0.71 C 0.76 C 60 Brookhurst St / Catalina Ave 0.76 C 0.59 A 61 Brookhurst St / Lincoln Ave 0.78 C 0.81 D 62 Brookhurst St / Broadway 0.66 B 0.76 C 63 Brookhurst St / Orange Ave 0.49 A 0.58 A 64 Brookhurst St / Brookmore Ave 0.49 A 0.47 A 65 Brookhurst St / Ball Rd 0.66 B 0.81 D ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 13 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 66 Brookhurst St / Cerritos Ave 0.84 D 0.83 D 67 Brookhurst St / Katella Ave 0.87 D 0.89 D 68 Columbine St / La Palma Ave 0.49 A 0.49 A 69 Anaheim Shores Dr / Fairview St / La Palma Ave 0.50 A 0.56 A 70 Muller St / Crescent Ave 0.29 A 0.33 A 71 Muller St / Lincoln Ave 0.64 B 0.55 A 72 Crescent Way / Lincoln Ave 0.65 B 0.65 B 73 Agate St / Broadway 0.45 A 0.41 A 74 Empire St / Ball Rd 0.55 A 0.45 A 75 Nutwood St / Broadway 0.46 A 0.42 A 76 Nutwood St / Orange Ave 0.25 A 0.12 A 77 Nutwood St / Orange Ave 0.24 A 0.14 A 78 Nutwood St / Ball Rd 0.55 A 0.60 A 79 Nutwood St / Cerritos Ave 0.61 B 0.54 A 80 Nutwood St / Katella Ave 0.71 C 0.70 B 81 Trident St / Ball Rd 0.56 A 0.49 A 82 Euclid St / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.62 B 0.85 D 83 Euclid St / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.65 B 0.65 B 84 Euclid St / Medical Center Dr 0.56 A 0.64 B 85 Euclid St / Romneya Dr 0.74 C 0.73 C 86 Euclid St / La Palma Ave 0.67 B 0.79 C 87 Euclid St / Glenoaks Ave 0.62 B 0.64 B 88 Euclid St / Crescent Ave 0.80 C 0.87 D 89 Euclid St / Anaheim Shopping Center 0.66 B 0.69 B 90 Euclid St / I-5 NB and SB Ramps 0.74 C 0.85 D 91 Euclid St / Lincoln Ave 0.91 E 0.87 D 92 Euclid St / Target Driveway 0.40 A 0.48 A 93 Euclid St / Broadway 0.83 D 0.84 D 94 Euclid St / Orange Ave 0.55 A 0.51 A 95 Euclid St / Crone Ave 0.59 A 0.55 A 96 Euclid St / Ball Rd 0.75 C 0.79 C 97 Euclid St / Palais Rd 0.45 A 0.43 A 98 Euclid St / Cerritos Ave 0.92 E 0.96 E 99 Euclid St / Katella Ave 0.87 D 0.91 E 100 Euclid St / Orangewood Ave 0.68 B 0.79 C 101 Loara St / North St 0.37 A 0.43 A 102 Loara St / Crescent Ave 0.61 B 0.69 B 103 Loara St / Westmont Dr 0.50 A 0.62 B 104 Loara St / Lincoln Ave 0.90 D 0.65 B 105 Loara St / Broadway 0.62 B 0.65 B 106 Loara St / Ball Rd 0.71 C 0.76 C 107 Loara St / Orangewood Ave 0.43 A 0.39 A 108 I-5 SB Ramps / Lincoln Ave 0.61 B 0.82 D 109 Manchester Ave / Lincoln Ave 0.63 B 0.66 B 110 I-5 NB Ramps / Lincoln Ave 0.72 C 0.88 D 111 9th St / Cerritos Ave 0.51 A 0.42 A 112 9th St / Katella Ave 0.78 C 0.61 B 113 9th St / Orangewood Ave 0.72 C 0.61 B 114 Manchester Ave / Broadway 0.65 B 0.65 B 115 Manchester Ave / Santa Ana St 0.48 A 0.60 A 116 Walnut St / Ball Rd 0.88 D 0.82 D 117 Walnut St / Cerritos Ave 0.72 C 0.78 C 118 Walnut St / Katella Ave 0.77 C 0.77 C 119 Flore St/West Pl / Ball Rd 0.65 B 0.54 A 120 West St / La Palma Ave (West side) 0.41 A 0.57 A 121 West St / La Palma Ave (East side) 0.49 A 0.52 A 122 West St / Lincoln Ave 0.62 B 0.66 B 123 West St / Broadway 0.53 A 0.54 A 124 West St / Santa Ana St 0.44 A 0.43 A 125 Disneyland Dr / I-5 Ramps 0.52 A 0.35 A 126 Disneyland Dr / Ball Rd 0.87 D 0.92 E 127 Disneyland Dr / Magic Way 0.45 A 0.55 A 128 Disneyland Dr / Paradise 0.30 A 0.37 A 129 Disneyland Dr / Simba 0.52 A 0.70 B 130 Disneyland Dr / Katella Ave 0.86 D 0.95 E 131 West St / Convention Way 0.37 A 0.35 A 132 West St / Orangewood Ave 0.60 A 0.64 B ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 14 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 133 Ox Rd / Ball Rd 0.68 B 0.76 C 134 Convention Center / Katella Ave 0.55 A 0.65 B 135 Hotel Way / Katella Ave 0.66 B 0.75 C 136 Hotel Way / Convention Way 0.52 A 0.51 A 137 Citron St / La Palma Ave 0.48 A 0.50 A 138 Citron St / Lincoln Ave 0.48 A 0.51 A 139 Citron St / Broadway 0.42 A 0.46 A 140 Harbor Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.56 A 0.77 C 141 Harbor Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.58 A 0.64 B 142 Harbor Blvd / Romneya Dr 0.74 C 0.67 B 143 Harbor Blvd / La Palma Ave 0.83 D 0.96 E 144 Harbor Blvd / North St 0.76 C 0.66 B 145 Harbor Blvd / Sycamore St 0.75 C 0.68 B 146 Harbor Blvd / Lincoln Ave 0.92 E 0.88 D 147 Harbor Blvd / Broadway 0.84 D 0.86 D 148 Harbor Blvd / Santa Ana St 0.89 D 0.77 C 149 Harbor Blvd / Water St 0.62 B 0.51 A 150 Harbor Blvd / South St 0.70 B 0.72 C 151 Harbor Blvd / Vermont Ave 0.78 C 0.70 B 152 Harbor Blvd / Ball Rd 1.10 F 1.11 F 153 Harbor Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps 0.87 D 0.85 D 154 Harbor Blvd / I-5 SB Ramps 0.59 A 0.42 A 155 Harbor Blvd / Manchester Ave 0.90 D 0.59 A 156 Harbor Blvd / East Shuttle Area 0.43 A 0.37 A 157 Harbor Blvd / Disney Way 0.40 A 0.43 A 158 Harbor Blvd / Katella Ave 0.80 C 0.89 D 159 Harbor Blvd / Convention Way 0.74 C 0.73 C 160 Harbor Blvd / Orangewood Ave 0.73 C 0.85 D 161 Harbor Blvd / Wilken Way 0.35 A 0.54 A 162 Harbor Blvd / Chapman Ave 0.63 B 0.75 C 163 Lemon St / Orangethorpe Ave 0.70 B 1.01 F 164 Lemon St / Orangefair Ave 0.61 B 0.74 C 165 Lemon St/Anaheim Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.71 C 0.77 C 166 Lemon St/Anaheim Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.62 B 0.71 C 167 Anaheim Blvd / Commercial St 0.33 A 0.44 A 168 Lemon St / Lincoln Ave 0.40 A 0.45 A 169 Lemon St / Broadway 0.42 A 0.50 A 170 Lemon St / Ball Rd 0.51 A 0.47 A 171 Clementine St / Lincoln Ave 0.73 C 0.73 C 172 Clementine St / Broadway 0.44 A 0.40 A 173 Clementine St / Disney Way 0.57 A 0.57 A 174 Clementine St / Katella Ave 0.65 B 0.82 D 175 Clementine St / Gene Autry Way 0.41 A 0.60 A 176 Clementine St / Orangewood Ave 0.53 A 0.45 A 177 Willowbrook Ln / Chapman Ave 0.50 A 0.50 A 178 Anaheim Blvd / Carl Karcher Way 0.33 A 0.44 A 179 Anaheim Blvd / La Palma Ave W 0.66 B 0.78 C 180 Anaheim Blvd / La Palma Ave E 0.71 C 0.85 D 181 Anaheim Blvd / North St 0.59 A 0.67 B 182 Anaheim Blvd / Sycamore St 0.54 A 0.65 B 183 Anaheim Blvd / Lincoln Ave 0.69 B 0.77 C 184 Anaheim Blvd / Center St 0.47 A 0.48 A 185 Anaheim Blvd / Center St Promenade 0.48 A 0.36 A 186 Anaheim Blvd / Broadway 0.77 C 0.83 D 187 Anaheim Blvd / Santa Ana St 0.66 B 0.77 C 188 Anaheim Blvd / Water St 0.54 A 0.65 B 189 Anaheim Blvd / South St 0.79 C 0.81 D 190 Anaheim Blvd / Vermont Ave 1.04 F 0.85 D 191 Anaheim Blvd / Ball Rd 0.74 C 0.89 D 192 Anaheim Blvd / Palais Rd 0.49 A 0.63 B 193 Anaheim Blvd / Cerritos Ave 0.74 C 0.89 D 194 Anaheim Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps 0.50 A 0.83 D 195 Anaheim Blvd / I-5 SB Ramps 0.61 B 0.85 D 196 I-5 SB Off Ramp / Disney Way 0.47 A 0.44 A 197 Anaheim Blvd / Katella Ave 0.90 D 0.89 D 198 Haster St / Gene Autry Way 0.62 B 0.93 E 199 Haster St / Orangewood Ave 0.79 C 0.75 C ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 15 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 200 Haster St / Wilken Way 0.52 A 0.50 A 201 Haster St / Chapman Ave 0.64 B 0.70 B 202 Olive St / La Palma Ave 0.51 A 0.48 A 203 Olive St / Lincoln Ave 0.50 A 0.50 A 204 Olive St / Broadway 0.54 A 0.47 A 205 Olive St / Vermont Ave 0.45 A 0.43 A 206 Claudina St / Ball Rd 0.60 A 0.68 B 207 Allec St / Ball Rd 0.60 A 0.65 B 208 Allec St / Cerritos Ave 0.48 A 0.61 B 209 Mountain View Ave / Orangewood Ave 0.37 A 0.42 A 210 Manchester Ave/I-5 SB Ramps / Katella Ave 0.83 D 0.73 C 211 Anaheim Way/I-5 NB Ramps / Katella Ave 0.90 D 0.86 D 212 Raymond Ave / Orangethorpe Ave 0.68 B 0.86 D 213 East St/Raymond Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.67 B 0.71 C 214 East St / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.68 B 0.80 C 215 East St / Romneya Dr 0.45 A 0.62 B 216 East St / La Palma Ave 0.82 D 0.81 D 217 East St / Sycamore St 0.69 B 0.65 B 218 East St / Lincoln Ave 0.84 D 0.91 E 219 East St / Broadway 0.87 D 0.74 C 220 East St / Santa Ana St 0.60 A 0.59 A 221 East St / South St 0.78 C 0.71 C 222 East St / Vermont Ave 0.79 C 0.79 C 223 East St / Ball Rd 0.81 D 0.79 C 224 Lewis St / Ball Rd 0.72 C 0.97 E 225 Lewis St / Cerritos Ave 0.88 D 0.78 C 226 Lewis St / North Connector Rd 0.38 A 0.41 A 227 Lewis St / Katella Ave 0.81 D 0.81 D 228 Lewis St / Anaheim Way 0.13 A 0.45 A 229 Lewis St / Lewis/Anaheim Connector 0.52 A 0.63 B 230 Lewis St / Gene Autry Way 0.44 A 0.50 A 231 Lewis St / Orangewood Ave 0.57 A 0.79 C 232 Acacia St / Romneya Dr 0.44 A 0.47 A 233 Acacia St / La Palma Ave 0.77 C 0.56 A 234 Baxter St / La Palma Ave 0.44 A 0.47 A 235 La Plaza / Lincoln Ave 0.62 B 0.53 A 236 Vernon St / Cerritos Ave 0.52 A 0.56 A 237 Market St / Katella Ave 0.55 A 0.58 A 238 Market St / Gene Autry Way 0.48 A 0.50 A 239 I-5 HOV Ramps / Gene Autry Way 0.38 A 0.32 A 240 Manchester Ave / Orangewood Ave 0.89 D 0.80 C 241 Anaheim Way / Orangewood Ave 0.50 A 0.68 B 242 Orange Center Dr / Orangewood Ave 0.53 A 0.67 B 243 State College Blvd / Orangethorpe Ave 0.75 C 0.74 C 244 State College Blvd / Via Burton St 0.59 A 0.65 B 245 State College Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.59 A 0.73 C 246 State College Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.54 A 0.62 B 247 State College Blvd / Romneya Dr 0.61 B 0.74 C 248 State College Blvd / Sycamore Plaza 0.40 A 0.53 A 249 State College Blvd / La Palma Ave 0.70 B 0.81 D 250 State College Blvd / Underhill Ave 0.44 A 0.51 A 251 State College Blvd / Lincoln Ave 0.80 C 0.80 C 252 State College Blvd / Anaheim Town Center 0.32 A 0.45 A 253 State College Blvd / Santa Ana St 0.41 A 0.46 A 254 State College Blvd / South St N 0.71 C 0.67 B 255 State College Blvd / South St S 0.58 A 0.63 B 256 State College Blvd / Vermont Ave 0.65 B 0.50 A 257 State College Blvd / Wagner Ave 0.58 A 0.55 A 258 State College Blvd / Ball Rd 0.87 D 0.84 D 259 State College Blvd / Winston Rd 0.57 A 0.61 B 260 State College Blvd / Cerritos Ave 0.74 C 0.71 C 261 State College Blvd / Howell Ave 0.56 A 0.63 B 262 State College Blvd / Katella Ave 0.89 D 0.95 E 263 State College Blvd / Gateway 0.73 C 0.82 D 264 State College Blvd / Gene Autry Way 0.70 B 0.86 D 265 State College Blvd / Artisan Ct 0.48 A 0.59 A 266 State College Blvd / Orangewood Ave 0.82 D 1.05 F ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 16 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 267 State College Blvd / Orange Center Dr 0.43 A 0.62 B 268 State College Blvd / I-5 NB Ramps 0.70 B 0.73 C 269 State College Blvd / I-5 SB Ramps 0.60 A 0.56 A 270 State College Blvd / Chapman Ave 0.71 C 0.81 D 271 Placentia Ave / Orangethorpe Ave 0.57 A 0.64 B 272 Placentia Ave / Via Burton St 0.22 A 0.37 A 273 Placentia Ave / La Jolla St 0.28 A 0.42 A 274 Anaheim Town Center / Lincoln Ave 0.57 A 0.51 A 275 Peregrine St / Lincoln Ave 0.57 A 0.58 A 276 Sunkist St / Howell Ave 0.62 B 0.74 C 277 Howell Ave / Katella Ave 0.86 D 0.83 D 278 Sportstown / Katella Ave 0.82 D 0.90 D 279 Sunkist St/Miraloma Ave / La Palma Ave 0.80 C 0.91 E 280 Sunkist St / Lincoln Ave 0.85 D 0.82 D 281 Sunkist St / South St 0.72 C 0.67 B 282 Sunkist St / Wagner Ave 0.80 C 0.49 A 283 Sunkist St / Ball Rd 0.89 D 0.85 D 284 Sunkist St / Winston Rd 0.52 A 0.43 A 285 Sunkist St / Cerritos Ave 0.83 D 0.88 D 286 SR-57 SB Ramps / Orangethorpe Ave 0.55 A 0.54 A 287 SR-57 NB Ramps / Orangethorpe Ave 0.63 B 0.70 B 288 SR-57 SB Ramps / Lincoln Ave 0.69 B 0.63 B 289 SR-57 NB Ramps / Lincoln Ave 0.55 A 0.69 B 290 SR-57 SB Ramps / Ball Rd 0.82 D 0.64 B 291 SR-57 NB Ramps / Ball Rd 0.76 C 0.80 C 292 SR-57 SB Ramps / Katella Ave 0.85 D 0.75 C 293 SR-57 NB Ramps / Katella Ave 0.69 B 0.70 B 294 Phoenix Club Dr / Ball Rd 0.83 D 0.88 D 295 Douglass Rd / Katella Ave 0.82 D 0.78 C 296 Dupont Dr / Orangewood Ave 0.67 B 0.82 D 297 Rampart St / Orangewood Ave 0.69 B 0.85 D 298 SR-57 SB Ramps / Orangewood Ave 0.87 D 0.91 E 299 SR-57 NB Ramps / Orangewood Ave 0.64 B 0.69 B 300 Chantilly St/Frontera St / La Palma Ave 0.60 A 0.56 A 301 Rio Vista St / Frontera St 0.36 A 0.30 A 302 Rio Vista St / Lincoln Ave 0.94 E 0.86 D 303 Rio Vista St / South St 0.37 A 0.33 A 304 Kingsley St / Lincoln Ave 0.59 A 0.58 A 305 Melrose St / Orangethorpe Ave 0.58 A 0.69 B 306 Melrose St / La Jolla St 0.46 A 0.54 A 307 Blue Gum St / Miraloma Ave 0.43 A 0.62 B 308 Blue Gum St / Coronado St 0.19 A 0.23 A 309 Blue Gum St / La Palma Ave 0.60 A 0.79 C 310 Sunshine Way / Miraloma Ave 0.36 A 0.36 A 311 White Star Ave / La Palma Ave 0.20 A 0.28 A 312 Red Gum St / Miraloma Ave 0.26 A 0.30 A 313 Red Gum St / La Palma Ave 0.38 A 0.53 A 314 Kraemer Blvd / Crowther Ave 0.84 D 0.68 B 315 Kraemer Blvd / Orangethorpe Ave 0.85 D 0.80 C 316 Kraemer Blvd / La Jolla St 0.64 B 0.52 A 317 Kraemer Blvd / Miraloma Ave 0.81 D 0.89 D 318 Kraemer Blvd / Coronado St 0.52 A 0.52 A 319 Kraemer Blvd / La Palma Ave 0.81 D 0.84 D 320 Kraemer Blvd / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.66 B 0.70 B 321 Kraemer Blvd / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.57 A 0.86 D 322 Glassell St / Frontera St 0.82 D 0.69 B 323 Shepard St / La Palma Ave 0.40 A 0.56 A 324 Miller St / Orangethorpe Ave 0.41 A 0.50 A 325 Miller St / Miraloma St 0.61 B 0.56 A 326 Miller St / Autonetics Way 0.21 A 0.20 A 327 Miller St / La Palma Ave 0.64 B 0.73 C 328 Ocean Cir / La Palma Ave 0.25 A 0.37 A 329 Chapman Ave / Orangethorpe Ave 0.44 A 0.68 B 330 Grove St / Miraloma Ave 0.30 A 0.43 A 331 Grove St / La Palma Ave 0.60 A 0.59 A 332 Cosby Way / La Palma Ave 0.42 A 0.53 A 333 Tustin Ave / Orangethorpe Connector 0.68 B 0.87 D ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 17 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 334 Orangethorpe Ave / Tustin Connector 0.64 B 0.62 B 335 Tustin Ave / Miraloma Ave 0.83 D 0.87 D 336 Tustin Ave / Jefferson St 0.78 C 0.65 B 337 Tustin Ave / La Palma Ave 0.87 D 0.88 D 338 Tustin Ave / Pacificenter Dr 0.64 B 0.69 B 339 Tustin Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.96 E 0.90 D 340 Tustin Ave / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.81 D 0.81 D 341 Tustin Ave / Riverdale Ave 0.71 C 0.81 D 342 Tustin Ave / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.38 A 0.37 A 343 Pacificenter Dr / La Palma Ave 0.36 A 0.31 A 344 Jefferson St / Orangethorpe Ave 0.43 A 0.48 A 345 Jefferson St / Miraloma Ave 0.40 A 0.31 A 346 Van Buren St / Orangethorpe Ave 0.41 A 0.37 A 347 Van Buren St / Miraloma Ave 0.29 A 0.30 A 348 Van Buren St / La Palma Ave 0.53 A 0.60 A 349 Richfield Rd / Orangethorpe Ave 0.62 B 0.68 B 350 Richfield Rd / Miraloma Ave 0.45 A 0.55 A 351 Richfield Rd / La Palma Ave 0.69 B 0.70 B 352 Finch St / Riverdale Ave 0.37 A 0.37 A 353 Deerfield St / Riverdale Ave 0.39 A 0.33 A 354 Lakeview Ave / Orangethorpe Connector 0.39 A 0.48 A 355 Orangethorpe Ave / Lakeview Connector 0.52 A 0.47 A 356 Lakeview Ave / Miraloma Ave 0.53 A 0.48 A 357 Lakeview Ave / La Palma Ave 0.66 B 0.82 D 358 Lakeview Ave / Riverdale Ave 0.66 B 0.83 D 359 Lakeview Ave / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.73 C 0.57 A 360 Lakeview Ave / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.84 D 0.77 C 361 Lakeview Ave / SR-91 EB Off Ramp 0.58 A 0.45 A 362 Villa Real Dr / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.28 A 0.24 A 363 Meats Ave / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.54 A 0.32 A 364 Hancock St / La Palma Ave 0.38 A 0.40 A 365 Manassero St / La Palma Ave 0.31 A 0.28 A 366 Brasher St / La Palma Ave 0.29 A 0.29 A 367 Wescom Center / La Palma Ave 0.35 A 0.41 A 368 Cinema City / La Palma Ave 0.40 A 0.47 A 369 Kellogg Dr / SR-90 WB Ramps 0.41 A 0.45 A 370 Kellogg Dr / SR-90 EB Ramps 0.37 A 0.45 A 371 Kellogg Dr / Glenview Ave 0.45 A 0.29 A 372 Kellogg Dr / Orangethorpe Ave 0.66 B 0.72 C 373 Kellogg Dr / Orangethorpe Ave 0.77 C 0.69 B 374 Kellogg Dr / La Palma Ave 0.59 A 0.62 B 375 Royal Oak Rd/Pinney Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.69 B 0.49 A 376 Royal Oak Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.50 A 0.31 A 377 Avd Margarita / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.46 A 0.54 A 378 Rural Ridge Dr / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.31 A 0.28 A 379 SR-90 Connector / Orangethorpe Ave 0.67 B 0.54 A 380 Imperial Highway / Orangethorpe Connector 0.54 A 0.50 A 381 SR-90 WB On Ramp / Orangethorpe Ave 0.38 A 0.36 A 382 Imperial Hwy / La Palma Ave 0.83 D 0.82 D 383 Imperial Hwy / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.62 B 0.67 B 384 Imperial Hwy / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.76 C 0.79 C 385 Imperial Hwy / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.85 D 0.85 D 386 Imperial Hwy / Ave Bernardo N 0.71 C 0.55 A 387 Imperial Hwy / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.83 D 0.79 C 388 Imperial Hwy / Big Sky Ln/River Valley Trail 0.64 B 0.49 A 389 Chrisden St / La Palma Ave 0.40 A 0.61 B 390 Fairmont Blvd / La Palma Ave 0.76 C 0.99 E 391 Emogene St / La Palma Ave 0.52 A 0.39 A 392 Jenifer Dr / La Palma Ave 0.46 A 0.35 A 393 Via Cortez / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.64 B 0.84 D 394 Solomon Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.74 C 0.78 C 395 Anaheim Hills Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.84 D 0.86 D 396 Fairmont Blvd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.62 B 0.69 B 397 Mohler Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.58 A 0.60 A 398 Eucalyptus Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.31 A 0.26 A 399 Deer Canyon Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.39 A 0.46 A 400 Festival Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.29 A 0.42 A ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 18 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 401 Festival Center / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.22 A 0.28 A 402 Roosevelt Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.38 A 0.71 C 403 Riverview Dr / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.42 A 0.50 A 404 Woodcreek Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.31 A 0.43 A 405 Roosevelt Rd / Festival Dr/Monta Vista Ave 0.25 A 0.37 A 406 Scout Trail / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.60 A 0.56 A 407 Anaheim Hills Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.63 B 0.57 A 408 Canyon Rim Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.50 A 0.54 A 409 Stage Coach Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.33 A 0.28 A 410 Walnut Canyon Rd / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.22 A 0.21 A 411 Camino Grande / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.23 A 0.21 A 412 Serrano Ave / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.48 A 0.30 A 413 Fairmont Blvd / Canyon Rim Rd 0.44 A 0.24 A 414 Weir Canyon Rd / La Palma Ave 0.75 C 0.85 D 415 Weir Canyon Rd / Savi Ranch Pkwy 0.46 A 0.75 C 416 Weir Canyon Rd / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.68 B 0.70 B 417 Weir Canyon Rd / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.73 C 0.89 D 418 Weir Canyon Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.78 C 0.79 C 419 Weir Canyon Rd / Monte Vista Rd 0.51 A 0.76 C 420 Weir Canyon Rd / Serrano Ave 0.74 C 0.48 A 421 Weir Canyon Rd / Running Springs Rd 0.25 A 0.21 A 422 Weir Canyon Rd / Oak Canyon Dr 0.28 A 0.26 A 423 Weir Canyon Rd / Mountain Park Dr 0.25 A 0.22 A 424 Serrano Ave / Canyon Creek Rd 0.35 A 0.42 A 425 Serrano Ave / Oak Canyon Dr 0.48 A 0.37 A 426 Serrano Ave / Sunset Ridge Rd 0.45 A 0.36 A 427 Serrano Ave / Highcrest Dr 0.41 A 0.31 A 428 Serrano Ave / Canyon Rim Rd 0.50 A 0.37 A 429 Gypsum Canyon Rd / SR-91 WB Ramps 0.42 A 0.48 A 430 Gypsum Canyon Rd / SR-91 EB Ramps 0.31 A 0.24 A 431 Gypsum Canyon Rd / Santa Ana Canyon Rd 0.48 A 0.63 B 432 SR-22 WB Ramps / Metropolitan Dr 0.39 A 0.38 A 433 The City Dr / Metropolitan Dr 0.39 A 0.31 A 434 The City Dr / SR-22 EB Ramps 0.59 A 0.61 B 435 The City Dr / Garden Grove Blvd 0.60 A 0.76 C 436 I-5 Ramps / Chapman Ave 0.45 A 0.54 A 437 Rampart St / Chapman Ave 0.35 A 0.42 A 438 SR-57 SB Ramps / Chapman Ave 0.76 C 0.74 C 439 SR-57 NB Ramps / Chapman Ave 0.56 A 0.51 A 440 Flower St / Chapman Ave 0.47 A 0.70 B 441 Struck Ave / Katella Ave 0.45 A 0.57 A 442 Eckhoff St / Collins Ave 0.74 C 0.79 C 443 Eckhoff St / Orangewood Ave 0.59 A 0.51 A 444 Main St / Taft Ave 0.85 D 1.00 E 445 Main St / Katella Ave 0.70 B 0.78 C 446 Main St / Struck Ave 0.66 B 0.60 A 447 Main St / Collins St 0.74 C 0.89 D 448 Main St / Orangewood Ave 0.52 A 0.65 B 449 Main St / Chapman Ave 0.57 A 0.74 C 450 Batavia St / Lincoln Ave 0.95 E 0.70 B 451 Batavia St / Taft Ave 0.81 D 0.84 D 452 Batavia St / Katella Ave 0.82 D 0.81 D 453 Batavia St / Collins St 0.49 A 0.48 A 454 Batavia St / Walnut Ave 0.59 A 0.58 A 455 Glassell St / Riverdale Ave 0.69 B 0.76 C 456 Glassell St / Lincoln Ave 0.70 B 0.66 B 457 Glassell St / Taft Ave 0.85 D 0.63 B 458 Glassell St / Katella Ave 0.73 C 0.64 B 459 Glassell St / Collins St 0.54 A 0.58 A 460 Glassell St / Walnut Ave 0.56 A 0.55 A 461 Cambridge St / Taft Ave 0.93 E 1.11 F 462 Cambridge St / Katella Ave 0.78 C 0.80 C 463 Tustin Ave / SR-55 SB Off Ramp 0.77 C 0.69 B 464 Tustin Ave / Lincoln Ave 0.71 C 0.68 B 465 Tustin Ave / SR-55 On Ramp 0.54 A 0.72 C 466 Tustin Ave / Meats Ave 0.53 A 0.73 C 467 Tustin Ave / Taft Ave 0.60 A 0.69 B ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 19 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Int # (new ATAM 2012 # scheme) Intersection Future 2035 General Plan Buildout ( ATAM 2012) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS 468 Tustin Ave / Taft Ave 0.86 D 0.71 C 469 Tustin Ave / Katella Ave 0.63 B 0.86 D 470 SR-55 SB Ramps / Katella Ave 0.89 D 0.91 E 471 SR-55 NB Ramps / Katella Ave 0.73 C 0.72 C 472 Santiago Blvd / Nohl Ranch Rd 0.49 A 0.56 A 473 Santiago Blvd / SR-55 NB Ramps 0.80 C 0.94 E 474 Santiago Blvd / Meats Ave 0.74 C 0.50 A 475 Cannon St / Via Escola 0.57 A 0.54 A Note: - Indicates intersection located outside of City of Anaheim yet included in ATAM 2012 post processor. These locations shown for informational purposes only. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 20 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Rezoning Project Technical Traffic Study Page A- 21 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study APPENDIX C: CITY OF ANAHEIM ARTERIAL SEGMENT DAILY LEVEL OF SERVICE 2004 APPROVED PROJECT (2025 FUTURE YEAR) AND PROPOSED PROJECT (2035) AADT SUMMARY ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Page A- 22 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Street From Location To Location 2004 General Plan ADT Year 2025 (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout ADT (ATAM 2012) AADT Mid-Block Lanes AADT Mid-Block Lanes ANAHEIM BLVD SYCAMORE ST NORTH ST 23,000 4D 25,700 4D BALL RD NUTWOOD ST EUCLID ST 29,000 4D 30,900 4D BALL RD HARBOR BLVD ANAHEIM BLVD 43,000 6D 50,700 6D BALL RD STATE COLLEGE BLVD SUNKIST ST 47,000 6D 53,300 6D BEACH BLVD BALL RD ORANGE AVE 57,000 8D 61,400 8D BROADWAY MANCHESTER AVE HARBOR BLVD 18,000 4U 17,100 4U BROOKHURST ST KATELLA AVE CERRITOS AVE 36,000 6D 36,600 6D BROOKHURST ST ORANGE AVE BROADWAY 37,000 6D 35,900 6D BROOKHURST ST LA PALMA AVE RIVERSIDE FWY 43,000 6D 50,700 6D CANYON RIM RD FAIRMONT BLVD SERRANO AVE 8,000 4D 8,000 4D CERRITOS AVE NUTWOOD ST EUCLID ST 8,000 4U 24,000 4U EUCLID ST CHAPMAN AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE 36,000 6D 34,000 6D EUCLID ST LA PALMA AVE ROMNEYA DR 50,000 6D 52,400 6D GILBERT ST BROADWAY LINCOLN AVE 5,000 2U 10,800 2U HARBOR BLVD CHAPMAN AVE WILKEN WAY 42,000 6D 43,400 6D HARBOR BLVD LA PALMA AVE ROMNEYA DR 34,000 6D 46,300 6D HASTER ST CHAPMAN AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE 28,000 6D 33,100 6D IMPERIAL HWY SOUTH CITY LIMITS NOHL RANCH RD 30,000 6D 27,700 6D IMPERIAL HWY LA PALMA AVE ORANGETHORPE AVE 57,000 8D 56,300 8D KATELLA AVE NUTWOOD ST EUCLID ST 38,000 6D 51,300 6D KATELLA AVE HARBOR BLVD CLEMENTINE ST 47,000 8D 62,500 8D KATELLA AVE LEWIS ST STATE COLLEGE BLVD 63,000 8D 84,500 8D KNOTT AVE ORANGE AVE LINCOLN AVE 34,000 6D 32,700 6D KRAEMER BLVD LA PALMA AVE CORONADO ST 34,000 6D 34,700 6D LA PALMA AVE DALE AVE MAGNOLIA AVE 23,000 4D 30,300 4D LA PALMA AVE ANAHEIM SHORES DR EUCLID ST 21,000 4D 21,800 4D LA PALMA AVE KELLOGG DR IMPERIAL HWY 32,000 6D 20,900 6D LAKEVIEW AVE LA PALMA AVE ORANGETHORPE AVE 23,000 4D 20,000 4D LEWIS ST CERRITOS AVE BALL RD 10,000 4D 15,800 4D LINCOLN AVE GILBERT ST BROOKHURST ST 32,000 6D 34,400 6D LINCOLN AVE OLIVE ST EAST ST 27,000 6D 25,500 6D LINCOLN AVE ORANGE FWY RIO VISTA ST 33,000 6D 49,500 6D MAGNOLIA AVE KATELLA AVE CERRITOS AVE 25,000 4D 24,500 4D MAGNOLIA AVE LA PALMA AVE I-5 44,000 6D 45,600 6D MIRALOMA AVE MILLER ST TUSTIN AVE 13,000 4D 12,400 4D NOHL RANCH RD IMPERIAL HWY ANAHEIM HILLS RD 22,000 4U 17,300 4U ORANGETHORPE AVE LEMON ST RAYMOND AVE 36,000 6D 28,000 6D ORANGETHORPE AVE KRAEMER BLVD MILLER ST 14,000 6D 15,600 6D ORANGETHORPE AVE LAKEVIEW AVE KELLOGG DR 17,000 6D 16,100 6D ORANGEWOOD AVE HARBOR BLVD HASTER ST 24,000 4U 21,600 4U ORANGEWOOD AVE STATE COLLEGE BLVD RAMPART ST 35,000 6D 60,000 6D RIVERDALE AVE TUSTIN AVE LAKEVIEW AVE 8,000 4U 8,800 4U SANTA ANA CYN RD NOHL RANCH RD LAKEVIEW AVE 10,000 4D 11,500 4D SANTA ANA CYN RD ROYAL OAK RD IMPERIAL HWY 17,000 6D 18,000 6D SANTA ANA CYN RD FAIRMONT BLVD EUCALYPTUS DR 29,000 4D 22,300 4D SANTA ANA ST MANCHESTER AVE HARBOR BLVD 2,000 2U 10,600 2U SERRANO AVE CANYON RIM RD OAK CANYON DR 19,000 4D 15,600 4D STATE COLLEGE BLVD CERRITOS AVE BALL RD 35,000 6D 36,800 6D STATE COLLEGE BLVD LINCOLN AVE LA PALMA AVE 46,000 6D 33,300 6D ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Page A- 23 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Street From Location To Location 2004 General Plan ADT Year 2025 (ATAM 2000) 2035 General Plan Buildout ADT (ATAM 2012) AADT Mid-Block Lanes AADT Mid-Block Lanes SUNKIST ST SOUTH ST LINCOLN AVE 17,000 4U 15,200 4U TUSTIN AVE JEFFERSON ST MIRALOMA AVE 38,000 6D 38,300 6D WEIR CYN RD LA PALMA AVE SHWY 91 47,000 6D 50,300 6D WEIR CYN RD SERRANO AVE OAK CANYON DR 12,000 6D 10,400 6D ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study Page A- 24 City of Anaheim Draft City of Anaheim General Plan Technical Traffic Study