Anaheim_doc_9755a874ec - Public Records Archive

Full Text

speciﬁc plan anaheim second revised public draft I august 2015 canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- speciﬁ c plan anaheim canyon prepared by: second revised public draft I august 2015 ---PAGE BREAK--- The work upon which this publication is based was funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the California Strategic Growth Council (SGC). The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the City of Anaheim and its consultant team, and not necessarily those of the SGC or of the Department of Conservation, or its employees. The SGC and the California Department of Conservation make no warranties, express or implied, and assume no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I i Originally a commercial and industrial support center for Orange County’s early 20th century agricultural industry, Anaheim Canyon became home to America’s defense and aerospace industry between the 1950s and 1980s. This industry was led by Boeing (formerly Autonetics), which at one point employed nearly 30,000 people and owned 2.5 million square feet of building space within Anaheim Canyon. The aerospace industry had a major role in developing the nation’s technologies, including the Navaho missile program; navigation systems for ships, submarines, missiles, aircraft, and space vehicles; data-processing systems; radar systems; and general-purpose digital computers. However, due to economic cycles, military downsizing and reorganization, and economic competition from other areas, many of these industries left Anaheim Canyon in the 1990s and early 2000s. Today, Anaheim Canyon is at a major turning point in its history. There is a strong need to create an updated and unique economic identity for Anaheim Canyon – a vision that will help the area once again become the leading innovation center for Southern California. With the departure of the defense industry over the last decade, Anaheim Canyon must take advantage of opportunities to reposition itself and set the course to become a leader in the “Innovation Economy.” Many things have changed in the United States culture and economy over the past few decades. The way Americans communicate and conduct business has become quicker and more productive, due in large part to the technology boom beginning in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Manufacturing and transportation of goods have also become more automated and streamlined. Even the way preamble: the future of anaheim canyon Anaheim Canyon has a long history as an economic engine and a leading center for innovative and cutting edge technology in Southern California. Innovation Economy The “Innovation Economy” is an ongoing conversation on the vital role of innovation in sustaining and building upon the United States’ competitiveness in the global economy. Applied to Anaheim Canyon, it is the idea that the area is a prime location to design, manufacture, and distribute the goods that come out of forward- thinking industries, including high tech, green, and new energy businesses. ---PAGE BREAK--- ii I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 p r e a m b l e : t h e f u t u r e o f a n a h e i m c a n y o n people commute to and from work has changed, as more are opting for transit and non-automotive forms of travel, or not commuting at all because they work from home. Innovation and places that incubate sustainable business growth are vital to expanding Anaheim Canyon’s competitiveness in a global economy. California is a leading innovator in ideas and designs related to the green economy. However, California has severely lagged in its ability to manufacture these new green products. A recent article noted that California “…boasts the highest number of green technology patents, 450 registered between 2007 and 2009,… but captured only 57 percent of the $4.9 billion in venture capital funding invested in clean technology nationwide in 2011.” 1 Now is a key time to plan for how Anaheim Canyon can take advantage of emerging industries and the new Innovation Economy. There are some real, pressing questions that face the City of Anaheim and the local business community, including: 1. What is the unique identity of Anaheim Canyon, and how will this affect its future? 2. What can the City do to partner with local businesses, and attract new businesses, to help them grow and prosper in Anaheim Canyon? 3. What strategies must be in place for Anaheim Canyon to become a leader in the Innovation Economy? 4. How can the City leverage its resources to support businesses as they look to locate or expand in Anaheim Canyon? The Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan sets out a clear path for how the City of Anaheim and the local business community can work together to transform Anaheim Canyon into a center for the Innovation Economy. The Speciﬁ c Plan strengthens public-private partnerships and outlines a clear strategy for transforming this regionally signiﬁ cant area. This strategy includes a focused set of infrastructure improvements to support businesses; an urban form and design strategy that will lead to a multimodal and aesthetically-pleasing environment; direction for how to provide greater amenities to workers and patrons; and guidance on how to make industries in the area more energy efﬁ cient. Lastly, this Speciﬁ c Plan includes a set of zoning and development standards that will help property owners and developers navigate the development review process. Streamlining the project approval process will result in greater certainty for the business community and, in turn, greater economic growth in Anaheim Canyon. Vision for Anaheim Canyon The vision statement for Anaheim Canyon shown on the following page was crafted based on input received from local business and property owners, area stakeholders, elected and appointed ofﬁ cials, employees, and members of the community. The vision expresses the shared desires for what Anaheim Canyon should become in the near future and describes the community’s philosophy for how existing and new businesses will be supported in Anaheim Canyon. Each of the incentives, strategies, development standards, and actions included in the Speciﬁ c Plan was developed to support and implement this vision. 1. Sacramento Bee, California Missing Out on ‘Green’ Manufacturing Jobs, May 20, 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I iii p r e a m b l e : t h e f u t u r e o f a n a h e i m c a n y o n The Vision “Anaheim Canyon is an engaging, innovative, and dynamic business environment that provides opportunities for growth, development, and sustained success supported by clear policies and regulations.” ---PAGE BREAK--- iv I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 p r e a m b l e : t h e f u t u r e o f a n a h e i m c a n y o n City Council Tom Tait, Mayor Lucille Kring, Mayor Pro-Tempore Jordan Brandman, Council Member James Vanderbilt, Council Member Kris Murray, Council Member Planning Commission John Seymour, Chair Michelle Lieberman, Chairman Pro-Tempore Grant Henninger, Commissioner Paul Bostwick, Commissioner Mitchell Caldwell, Commissioner Bill Dalati, Commissioner Victoria Ramirez, Commissioner Anaheim Canyon Advisory Group George Adams, SA Recycling Todd Ament, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Greg Ashwill, Ashwill Associates Mitch Ashwill, Ashwill Associates Jim Axtell, Kilroy Realty Stephen Batcheller, Panattoni Development Company Brad Bierbaum, CB Richard Ellis Jim Buckles, Leonard’s Services Craig Ersek, Essex Realty Management Jeff Farano, Sr., SA Recycling Joel Landau, Dominion Property Partners, LLC Margaret Larson, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Jake LeBlanc, Panattoni Development Company Larry Lukanish, Sares Regis Group Bill Montgomery, Sares Regis Group Jon Passaﬁ ume, Lee and Associates Mahmood Rezai, InfoSend Ben Seybold, CB Richard Ellis Tony Smale, Kaiser Permanente Marie Zambelli, PacSun acknowledgements ---PAGE BREAK--- p r e a m b l e : t h e f u t u r e o f a n a h e i m c a n y o n City Staff Community Development Department John Woodhead, Community Development Director Brad Hobson, Deputy Community Development Director David Gottlieb, Community Investment Manager Sergio Ramirez, Senior Project Manager Community Services Department Pamela Galera, Principal Project Planner Planning Department Jonathan E. Borrego, AICP, Planning Services Manager Susan Kim, AICP, LEED AP ND, Acting Principal Planner Ted White, AICP, Principal Planner Judy Dadant, Senior Planner Gustavo N. Gonzalez, AICP, Associate Planner Public Works Natalie Meeks, Public Works Director Raul Garcia, Acting Development Services Manager Khanh Chu, Acting Engineering Manager Linda Johnson, Principal Planner Johnny Chan, Assistant Engineer Ruby Emami, City Engineer Keith Linker, Principal Civil Engineer Leticia Mercado, Sanitation Contract Specialist Sandip Budhia, Associate Engineer David Kennedy, Principal Trafﬁ c Engineer Rafael Cobian, Associate Engineer Public Utilities Earl Lasley, Resource Program Specialist Phil Hayes, Business and Community Programs Manager Dukku Lee, General Manager Rod Yong, Senior Electrical Systems Designer Michael LeBlanc, Senior Power Systems Planning Engineer Larry Davis, Electrical Capital Projects Manager Al Shaikh, Principal Civil Engineer Sara Mathis, Principal Civil Engineer Ed Murdock, Senior Product Development Specialist Mark Brownrigg, Product Development Specialist a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I v ---PAGE BREAK--- vi I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 p r e a m b l e : t h e f u t u r e o f a n a h e i m c a n y o n Consultants MIG, Inc. Chris Beynon, AICP, Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager Dan Amsden, AICP, Deputy Project Manager Mindy Craig, Outreach and Branding Specialist Rick Barrett, LEED AP, Sustainability Planner Jeff Liljegren, AICP, LEED Green Associate, Project Associate Laura Shipman, Project Associate Chris Fullmer, Project Associate Marissa Reilly, Project Associate BAE Urban Economics Paul Peninger, Principal Ron Golem, Principal Stephanie Hagar, Associate Fuscoe Engineering Patrick R. Fuscoe, PE, President Ian Adam, Principal/Stormwater Manager Mike Ijams, GIS Brandon Norton, Technical Graphics Barbara Parker, Information Coordinator KEMA Andrea Traber, Principal Amy Rider, Sustainability Consultant Daisy Allen, Sustainability Professional Nathan Kinsey, Sustainability Professional Fehr & Peers Chris Gray, Senior Associate Thao Pham, Transportation Engineer/Planner acknowledgements ---PAGE BREAK--- p r e a m b l e : t h e f u t u r e o f a n a h e i m c a n y o n a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I vii table of contents Preamble: The Future of Anaheim Canyon i Acknowledgements Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Anaheim Canyon Proﬁ 1.2 Speciﬁ c Plan Update Process 1.3 Purpose of a Speciﬁ c Plan. 1.4 Document Overview Chapter 2: Key Findings and Opportunities 15 2.1 Economic and Market Conditions 2.2 Land Use and Urban Design 2.3 Mobility 2.4 Infrastructure 2.5 Sustainability 2.6 Identity and Branding 2.7 Regulatory Setting Chapter 3: Public Realm Improvements 29 3.1 Public Realm Transformative Strategies 3.2 Identity and Branding 3.3 Mobility Improvements 3.4 Open Space Improvements 3.5 Infrastructure Improvements 3.6 Public Realm Design Guidelines Chapter 4: Private Realm Incentives and Strategies 69 4.1 Private Realm Transformative 4.2 Business and Development 4.3 Transportation Demand 4.4 Identity and Branding 4.5 Development Chapter 5: Implementation 83 5.1 Implementation Action Plan Glossary of Abbreviations and Terms 101 Appendices A: Street Cross Sections B: Zoning and Development Standards C: Public Realm Plant D: Existing Conditions and Opportunities Analysis E: Industrial Park Amenities Survey and Analysis F: General Plan Consistency Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 1 chapter 1: introduction From the 1950s through the 1980s, the aerospace industry, led by Boeing, was instrumental in establishing Anaheim Canyon as a premier high tech manufacturing center. However, due to economic cycles, military downsizing and reorganization, and economic competition from other areas, many of these industries left Anaheim Canyon in the 1990s and early 2000s. The Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan is a long-range planning and regulatory document that establishes a clear vision and a series of transformative strategies that will deﬁ ne the future of public and private investment in the area. It supports the community’s vision for Anaheim Canyon as a vital and viable center for research, industry, and commerce that serves both the greater Southern California region and the nation. The Speciﬁ c Plan envisions transforming Anaheim Canyon into the leading center of the emerging Innovation Economy in Southern California. This includes supporting existing companies while also promoting new businesses that take full advantage of new technologies and manufacturing techniques. The Plan provides a clear action plan for where the public and private sectors should focus investment, development, and improvements to ensure the vision is effectively met and the long-term economic success of Anaheim Canyon is achieved. It also establishes a safe and accessible multimodal transportation network that accommodates vehicles, trucks, transit, pedestrians, and bicyclists to provide greater options and healthier living for area residents and workers. Anaheim Canyon has long served as a key local and regional commerce and employment center, supplying nearly a third of all jobs within Anaheim and drawing employees from throughout the region. In this Chapter… 1.1 Anaheim Canyon Proﬁ le 1.2 Speciﬁ c Plan Update Process 1.3 Purpose of a Speciﬁ c Plan 1.4 Document Overview ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n This Speciﬁ c Plan provides the roadmap for the City, other public agencies, and the private sector to respond to changing market forces and revitalize this important industrial core, while at the same time improving energy efﬁ ciency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These changes will help the area and region move towards a more economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable future. The overarching goals of the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan are to: 1. Create a successful business climate with ﬂ exible regulations. 2. Help local businesses meet State and regional sustainability mandates. 3. Engage private stakeholders in creating new economic development strategies. 4. Create a comprehensive vision that is supported by business owners, property owners, and the greater community. 5. Improve the physical image of the public realm to help promote economic growth. Boeing Site (formerly Autonetics), circa 1950 Former Boeing Site, 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 3 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n 1.1 Anaheim Canyon Proﬁ le Regional Location and Planning Area The City of Anaheim, founded in 1857, is one of the nation’s premier municipalities and is one of California’s most populous cities. Anaheim covers 50 square miles with more than 348,000 residents,124,000 private sector workers, and more than 2,950 City employees. The municipal corporation’s annual budget is $1.5 billion. Anaheim supports a thriving business community with companies such as Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc., L-3 Communications, and Paciﬁ c Sunwear. Successful sports franchises call Anaheim home, including Angels Baseball, Anaheim Ducks, the U.S. Men’s and Women’s National Volleyball Teams, and the Professional Arena Soccer League Anaheim Bolts. Anaheim also boasts world-class meeting and entertainment venues with the Anaheim Convention Center (LEED-certiﬁ ed and the largest on the West Coast), Disneyland Resort, Anaheim GardenWalk, Honda Center, Angel Stadium of Anaheim, and the City National Grove of Anaheim. In addition, Anaheim embraces its vibrant cultural arts community, including the world-renowned Anaheim Ballet. Annually, Anaheim welcomes millions of visitors, truly making it a place where the world comes to live, work, and play. Anaheim Canyon is located in the northern portion of Anaheim, approximately 25 anaheim canyon T 241 91 91 55 90 57 57 57 91 91 91 39 5 5 5 241 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River Walnut Canyon Reservoir fullerton placentia buena park orange anaheim yorba linda villa park stanton garden grove pedestrian path/trail * planned bikeway * existing bikeway * railroad city boundary water bodies 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend ﬁgure 1-1: city context metrolink station T ---PAGE BREAK--- 4 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana van buren jefferson hunter white star kellogg chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune manassero brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden pedestrian path/trail * planned bikeway * existing bikeway * railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 1-2: anaheim canyon planning area ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 5 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles (Figure 1-1). The Anaheim Canyon Planning Area (Figure 1-2) encompasses approximately 2,600 acres and is roughly bounded on the north by Orangethorpe Avenue, on the south by the Santa Ana River, on the east by Imperial Highway (State Route 90), and on the west by the Orange Freeway (State Route 57). The area is traversed by the Santa Ana River, which is the major drainage of the San Bernardino Mountains and a major water source for four counties. Anaheim Canyon beneﬁ ts from a strategic location in the heart of the Los Angeles/ Orange County region of Southern California. This close proximity to major populations has kept the area as one of the leading industrial centers in the region. The area also beneﬁ ts from access to an extensive transportation network that includes a BNSF/Metrolink rail line to the north, the Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) to the south, Imperial Highway (State Route 90) to the east, and the Orange Freeway (State Route 57) to the west. Beyond these transportation networks are a series of residential neighborhoods that surround Anaheim Canyon, within the cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Orange, Placentia, and Yorba Linda. Anaheim Canyon is near several higher education institutions, including California State University Fullerton, Fullerton College, Hope International University, Chapman College, and Santiago Canyon College. Planning History The City of Anaheim has a long history of working with property owners and area stakeholders to develop focused plans for Anaheim Canyon. Prior to the creation of this Speciﬁ c Plan, development activities were governed by two separate documents: the Northeast Area Speciﬁ c Plan and the Paciﬁ Center Anaheim Speciﬁ c Plan. The Northeast Area Speciﬁ c Plan covered most of the industrial area in Anaheim Canyon, and the Paciﬁ Center Anaheim Speciﬁ c Plan covered a one block piece of land at the southwest corner of La Palma and Tustin avenues. Both of these plans have been consolidated within, and replaced by, the new Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan. In addition to the two previous speciﬁ c plans, portions of Anaheim Canyon were also included in a Redevelopment Area. Redevelopment was a ﬁ nancial and legal tool used by many jurisdictions to remove blight by focusing public and private efforts towards rehabilitation. However, the State of California dissolved all Redevelopment Agencies effective February 1, 2012. The City of Anaheim has elected to become the “successor agency” to the Redevelopment Agency, which allows the City to continue to manage existing obligations that were already approved and/or under construction. ---PAGE BREAK--- 6 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n 1.2 Speciﬁ c Plan Update Process The Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan was adopted by City Council on [TBD] by Resolution [TBD]. The adoption of the Plan was the culmination of a broad community-based process that focused on actively engaging local business and property owners, partner agency staff, elected and appointed ofﬁ cials, the local workforce, and members of the community. The City also hired a multi- disciplinary consultant team of urban planners, economists, transportation specialists, civil engineers, and sustainability experts to conduct the planning process and perform technical analyses in support of the Speciﬁ c Plan effort. In order to garner input from a wide range of stakeholders, the community outreach and engagement process was broad in its approach. Beginning in early 2011, the process included meetings with the Anaheim Canyon Advisory Group, meetings with partner agencies, a large Community Workshop, surveys, a website, and meetings with elected and appointed ofﬁ cials. Several major products were produced at key milestones during the project. The process began with an Existing Conditions and Opportunities Analysis of Anaheim Canyon. The consultant team conducted a thorough background analysis, drawing upon existing studies and data. This work was supplemented with additional ﬁ eld observations, Advisory Group input, and community surveys. A summary of the analysis is highlighted in Chapter 2. Building on the existing conditions work, the initial meetings with the Advisory Group focused on deﬁ ning a vision for the future of Anaheim Canyon. This resulted in the second major work product of the update effort, the Draft Vision and Transformative Strategies summary. The City and consultant team then developed a focused and implementation oriented draft Speciﬁ c Plan that identiﬁ ed public and private actions necessary to transform Anaheim Canyon into the premier center for the Innovation Economy. The draft Plan was then taken to the Anaheim Canyon Advisory Group, the community and the Planning Commission for input and reﬁ nement leading to the ﬁ nal Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan that was adopted by the City Council. Project Funding Funding for the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan was provided by a $334,850 Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and Incentives Program Grant (Proposition 84) awarded to the City by the State of California’s Strategic Growth Council (SGC). The SGC is a cabinet-level committee of the Governor’s ofﬁ ce that is tasked with coordinating the activities of various State agencies related to: • Improving air and water quality • Protecting natural resources and agriculture lands • Increasing the availability of affordable housing • Promoting public health • Improving transportation • Encouraging greater inﬁ ll and compact development • Revitalizing community and urban centers ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 7 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n Following is a summary of each of the major components that comprised the public input and engagement process. Advisory Group Early in the planning process the City tapped into the existing Anaheim Canyon Advisory Group to provide input on the issues and opportunities facing Anaheim Canyon, and to serve as a liaison between the City and the community at large. The Advisory Group is generally comprised of 30 members, approximately two-thirds of which are local business owners and operators, developers, or real estate brokers. The remaining members are City of Anaheim employees from multiple departments including Planning, Community Development, Utilities, Public Works, and Community Services. The group was formed prior to the Speciﬁ c Plan process to provide input on economic development initiatives within Anaheim Canyon. Additional community members volunteered to participate in the Advisory Group as a result of public outreach during the development of the Speciﬁ c Plan. The Advisory Group provided valuable input and guidance throughout the planning process. Community Workshop and Input The City held a Community Workshop at Kaiser Permanente on February 15, 2012. More than 30 people attended the workshop, which included an overview of the project and a keynote discussion on emerging economic trends. The discussion was followed by an interactive open house that included displays characterizing existing conditions and opportunities for each of the Plan’s major topical areas. City staff and the consultant team were on hand to ﬁ eld questions from workshop participants. These discussions allowed the City and consultant team to better understand the speciﬁ c issues and concerns of the community. Community members and area stakeholders provided feedback during a Community Workshop ---PAGE BREAK--- 8 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n Amenities Survey A detailed survey was conducted for the project in early 2012. The survey asked business owners, property owners, workers, and residents what speciﬁ c types of amenities they think should be added or expanded in Anaheim Canyon. The survey was distributed to the Advisory Group and participants at the Community Workshop; provided at the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station and a local restaurant; and posted on the project website. The survey results showed that most respondents were neutral in regards to their satisfaction with the current amenities in Anaheim Canyon. However, three categories emerged as having great importance to the survey participants: • Establishing more sit-down restaurants, • Fostering greater mobility/accessibility, and • Creating a better overall appearance. The complete amenities survey can be found in Appendix D: Industrial Park Amenities Survey and Analysis. Project Webpage To help promote the project and make project-related information more accessible, the City developed a webpage dedicated to the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan project. The website included a summary of why the City conducted the project, links to key documents, and information on how people could provide input during the process. Other Agencies Key to the success of this project is close partnerships between the City of Anaheim and other public agencies that own property, have regulatory authority, operate facilities, or provide services within Anaheim Canyon. In addition to being involved during the planning process, each of these agencies will also be involved at various levels in the implementation of this Speciﬁ c Plan, and ultimately will directly contribute to the success of Anaheim Canyon. These agencies include: • Orange County Water District (OCWD). As the largest land owner in Anaheim Canyon, OCWD assisted the City throughout the development of the Speciﬁ c Plan. The City and Large, congested roadways in Anaheim Canyon are often unsafe for bicyclists and pedestrians ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 9 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n OCWD worked together to ensure that any future changes in the area do not affect OCWD’s ability to continue its groundwater recharge operations, which are of signiﬁ cant local and regional importance. • California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans maintains and operates all of the State Highways that surround and connect to Anaheim Canyon. The agency’s future freeway planning and expansion projects will have a signiﬁ cant effect on how people and goods travel to and from the area, which in turn will have a direct relationship with the long term economic health of Anaheim Canyon. • Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). OCTA operates all bus transit within Anaheim Canyon. In addition, OCTA is the local representative of the Metrolink Joint Powers Authority; the Authority operates rail transit at the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station. Transit expansion throughout Anaheim Canyon is an important objective of the Speciﬁ c Plan as the City looks to identify ways to reduce congestion and emissions, and promote multimodal transportation for residents and workers. • Orange County Flood Control District (OC Flood). OC Flood is responsible for protecting Anaheim Canyon from the threat of ﬂ oods by constructing and maintaining channels, pump stations, and other drainage related facilities. These include a large ﬂ ood control channel that extends from north of Anaheim Lake, through the western portion of Anaheim Canyon, and into the Santa Ana River. OC Flood waterways help protect Anaheim Canyon during large storm events OCTA provides bus transit services for Anaheim and greater Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- 10 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n 1.3 Purpose of a Speciﬁ c Plan The Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan is a strategic tool that will be used by the City of Anaheim, its residents, and the business community to help shape and create a vibrant, sustainable, and successful center for commerce. The primary purpose of this Plan is to outline a commonly agreed upon community- based vision for the future of the area; a vision that will result in positive changes to Anaheim Canyon that will beneﬁ t the entire community. To implement this vision, the Plan also provides the necessary steps to guide future public and private investment in the area. The following is a brief summary of how this Plan relates to other city, regional, State, and Federal plans and regulations. Relationship to the City of Anaheim General Plan Because Speciﬁ c Plans are mechanisms for executing the goals and policies of a community’s General Plan, State law requires that Speciﬁ c Plans must be consistent with the General Plan. As such, this Speciﬁ c Plan must be consistent with all goals, policies, objectives, and standards included in the City of Anaheim General Plan. Appendix E: General Plan Consistency Analysis provides a detailed summary of this Speciﬁ c Plan’s consistency with the City’s General Plan, including a summary of the portions of the General Plan that were amended prior to the adoption of the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan. What is a Speciﬁ c Plan? The State of California Governor’s Ofﬁ ce of Planning and Research provides the following deﬁ nition for a speciﬁ c plan: A speciﬁ c plan is a tool used for the systematic implementation of a general plan. It effectively establishes a link between implementing policies of the general plan and the individual development proposals in a deﬁ ned area within the general plan area. A speciﬁ c plan may be as general as setting forth broad policy concepts, or as detailed as providing direction to every facet of development. Direction can include the type, location, and intensity of uses; the design and capacity of infrastructure; the resources used to ﬁ nance public improvements; or the design guidelines of a subdivision. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 11 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n 1.4 Document Overview Speciﬁ c Plan Themes Certain themes resonate throughout the Speciﬁ c Plan. These themes are based on economic and market trends as well as community desires and needs. They build from the vision to create Anaheim Canyon as the premier center for the Innovation Economy. Themes include: • Economic Development. Fostering economic growth and development is the overarching objective of this Speciﬁ c Plan. The Plan articulates speciﬁ c actions the City of Anaheim and partner agencies will take to improve the public realm (infrastructure, streetscapes, and signage) in an effort to make Anaheim Canyon a more attractive and better functioning destination for businesses to locate. Actions include real, effective incentives the City can provide the local business community to help foster economic vitality. These include both regulatory incentives (streamlined development standards) and ﬁ nancial incentives (Green Building Program, Eco-Industrial Park Incentive). • High Quality Jobs. As part of the goal to capitalize on the emerging Innovation Economy, this Speciﬁ c Plan establishes strategies to attract quality, long-term jobs to Anaheim Canyon. While the private sector will largely be responsible for what types of industries are located within Anaheim Canyon, the City can play a role by incentivizing uses that are sustainable, high-value, and result in well paying jobs for the local workforce. • Sustainability. Complementary to economic factors, comprehensive sustainability is a key focus of this Speciﬁ c Plan. The City of Anaheim recognizes that sustainability goes well beyond just reducing energy demand or recycling materials. This Plan looks at sustainability in a holistic fashion and identiﬁ es ways Anaheim Canyon can become more environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable in the future. This includes strategies for how the City can best focus ﬁ scal resources to ensure the long-term service needs of Anaheim Canyon. • Implementation. The Speciﬁ c Plan includes clean and concise text, graphics, standards, and guidelines to make implementation straightforward and to provide certainty to area businesses and the development community. Recommendations include clearly identiﬁ ed roles, responsibilities, and timelines for future actions that are necessary to create positive change in Anaheim Canyon. The City and local business community must work together as strong partners to ensure continued economic growth and vitality in Anaheim Canyon. ---PAGE BREAK--- 12 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n Environmental Compliance On [TBD], as part of the Speciﬁ c Plan update, the City Council certiﬁ ed Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 348. Consistent with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the EIR was used as an analysis tool to help decision makers, staff, and the public understand the potential environmental impacts or beneﬁ ts associated with implementation of the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan. Speciﬁ c Plan Structure The Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan is designed to be easily understood and referenced by a range of users, including City staff, elected ofﬁ cials, developers, business and property owners, and community members. It is organized into the following ﬁ ve chapters: Chapter 1: Introduction This chapter summarizes the history and major characteristics of Anaheim Canyon; describes how the Speciﬁ c Plan was prepared; explains the Speciﬁ c Plan’s relationship to other plans and regulations; and outlines the structure of the document. Chapter 2: Key Findings and Opportunities This chapter summarizes key ﬁ ndings and opportunities identiﬁ ed in the Existing Conditions and Opportunities Analysis prepared by the City at the beginning of the planning process (see Appendix C: Existing Conditions and Opportunities Analysis). The key ﬁ ndings and opportunities provide a baseline analysis for identifying current market conditions; land use and urban design issues and assets; mobility and infrastructure assessments; sustainability factors; branding and identity considerations; and legal/regulatory conditions. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 13 c h a p t e r 1 : i n t r o d u c t i o n Chapter 3: Public Realm Improvements This chapter identiﬁ es the public realm improvements necessary to achieve the Speciﬁ c Plan’s vision and to help develop an overall brand for the area. The public realm includes all land owned or controlled by either the City of Anaheim or another public agency roads, rights-of-way, retention basins, ﬂ ood canals, Santa Ana River corridor). The chapter describes the brand and details needed improvements to the mobility and infrastructure networks. It also includes detailed design guidelines that help ensure public realm improvements are well deﬁ ned, sustainable, beautiful, and result in a coherent environment. Chapter 4: Private Realm Incentives and Strategies This chapter includes the business and development incentive programs the City offers to help attract and retain industrial and commercial businesses within Anaheim Canyon. It also summarizes parking and transportation demand management strategies that will be used to improve mobility. Lastly, this chapter identiﬁ es the location and intent of each Development Area in Anaheim Canyon. Speciﬁ c Zoning and Development Standards are codiﬁ ed in Chapter 18.120 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 5: Implementation This chapter includes the major actions necessary to implement the vision, policies, and concepts identiﬁ ed in the Speciﬁ c Plan. It includes a detailed Implementation Action Plan that prioritizes public projects, improvements, and investments to achieve the Speciﬁ c Plan’s transformative strategies. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 15 chapter 2: key ﬁ ndings and opportunities At the beginning of the planning process, the City and consultant team prepared an Existing Conditions and Opportunities Analysis (Appendix including a set of key ﬁ ndings and opportunities. These key ﬁ ndings and opportunities provide a baseline analysis for identifying current market conditions, land use and urban design issues and assets, mobility and infrastructure assessments, sustainability factors, branding and identity considerations, and legal/ regulatory conditions. This information was used to develop strategies and actions that will foster economic growth, support high quality development, and ensure appropriate public and private investment in Anaheim Canyon. Following is a summary of the key ﬁ ndings and opportunities, broken down by topical area. Anaheim Canyon has many physical characteristics that must be fully understood in order for the City and community to make informed decisions about how to build upon the area’s assets and address existing challenges. In this Chapter… 2.1 Economic and Market Conditions 2.2 Land Use and Urban Design 2.3 Mobility 2.4 Infrastructure 2.5 Sustainability 2.6 Identity and Branding 2.7 Regulatory Setting ---PAGE BREAK--- 16 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s 2.1 Economic and Market Conditions Anaheim Canyon is a major business and employment center in Orange County and contains nearly a third of the city’s jobs. The Great Recession signiﬁ cantly impacted Anaheim. In 2012 the city’s unemployment rate rose to 11 percent, the highest for any community in Orange County. The table below summarizes some of the key indicators that describe the economic and market conditions in Anaheim Canyon in 2012 when this analysis was completed. Fortunately, projections for future economic growth in Anaheim Canyon look strong. The Southern California Association of Governments estimates that jobs within Anaheim Canyon will increase by over 11,500 by 2035 (13 percent of market area total). While the focus of the area is on business growth, there will also be future housing demand linked primarily to transit-oriented development (TOD) adjacent or near the Metrolink Station. In terms of the commercial real estate market, as the space needs of industry evolve over time, Anaheim Canyon will be well positioned to capture demand for hybrid forms of ﬂ ex, industrial, and ofﬁ ce space currently in short supply in other key employment centers in Southern California. Key Economic Indicators in Anaheim Canyon (2012) Top Three Industry Sectors (based on the number of businesses in 21 different sectors) Manufacturing (17.6%) Construction (13.8%) Professional, Scientiﬁ c, and Technical Services (10.2%) Commercial Square Footage by Building Type Industrial (7 million) Flex (1.6 million) Medical (1.4 million) Ofﬁ ce (500,000) Retail (270,000) Total Businesses in Anaheim Canyon 2,953 Jobs Located within Anaheim Canyon 39,000 Sources: California State University Fullerton Center for Demographic Research, 2012; BAE, 2012 Great Recession The global recession that began in 2008, sometimes referred to as the Great Recession, was a major global economic crisis. It was largely caused by a burst in the United States housing bubble, collapse of several credit and ﬁ nancial markets, and the European debt crisis. While the Great Recession affected the entire world economy, it had particular impact on California where many areas, including Orange County, experienced substantial job loss and reduced home values. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 17 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s In order for Anaheim Canyon to thrive economically, it will need to continue to respond to market trends and competitive pressures from other major industrial areas such as the Inland Empire. One of the area’s key competitive advantages is that it is considered an excellent location for many large employers, based on its centrality to the Southern Californian labor market and convenient access to intermediate inputs (supplies in the industrial supply chain) and supplies. In addition, the area’s lease rates for ﬂ ex and industrial space are lower than the Orange County average, but higher than Inland Empire, based on the type and quality of space as well as the competitive location. While general business growth looks good, Anaheim Canyon is not considered a strong location for warehouse, distribution, or advanced logistics uses based on cost. It is considered a strong location for industrial production, repair, and research within the larger Southern California marketplace. In addition, Anaheim Canyon is an excellent location for attracting industrial and ofﬁ ce workforce uses from Los Angeles County, the Inland Empire, and other parts of Orange County because it has convenient access to intermediate inputs as well as critical repair and technical services. The area is within easy driving distance to executive housing in desirable residential areas of Orange County, and the City-owned municipal utility provides electric power and water to industrial and ofﬁ ce users. The City of Anaheim has a supportive regulatory climate and low cost of doing business when compared to other business park locations. However, Anaheim Canyon suffers from a lack of retail and food service amenities, a lack of recreational amenities for local workers, and outdated public infrastructure (roads, sidewalks, and public spaces). With all of these considerations taken into account, Anaheim Canyon remains a desirable place to locate and expand businesses. The following table summarizes the projected demand for new land uses within Anaheim Canyon. Major employers such as Kaiser Permanente provide high quality jobs in Anaheim Canyon Surrounding freeways offer ideal access for distribution services ---PAGE BREAK--- 18 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s Major Economic and Market Opportunities • Continue to take advantage of Anaheim Canyon’s strong competitive location for moderately priced industrial space oriented to users in a variety of industries such as aerospace suppliers, biosciences, medical devices, and green industries. Create high quality ofﬁ ce and industrial development to capture technology-related businesses and jobs as the economy improves. • Identify ways to take advantage of Anaheim Canyon’s large selection of industrial building sizes, which can provide opportunities for many types of businesses to locate in the area. • Pursue the potential demand for higher-amenity extended-stay hotels that serve local businesses as well as the medical/health cluster. • Create new food service, restaurants, and retail spaces that serve daytime customers. • Identify ways to attract businesses that will beneﬁ t from the high quality infrastructure, including recycled water. • Identify incentives to attract new businesses and help existing businesses grow and thrive. Future Land Use Demand Summary Type Acres Units/Square Feet Residential 11-63* 650-1,256 units Ofﬁ ce 20-122* 1,330,542 sq. ft. Retail 17-23* 255,042 sq. ft. Industrial 81-114* 1,239,820 sq. ft. * Estimate range varies depending on unit density and ﬂ oor area ratio (FAR) Sources: CSUF, 2012; BAE, 2012 “The Crossing” mixed-use development offers housing opportunities for local employees ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 19 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s 2.2 Land Use and Urban Design While there are a range of existing land uses and business types throughout Anaheim Canyon, most parcels are designated for either industrial or ofﬁ ce uses, or reserved for groundwater recharge activities. The area beneﬁ ts from a broad range of block and street patterns, parcel sizes, and building footprints that allow for a diverse mix of building sizes and types. In 2012 the three largest land uses by acreage in Anaheim Canyon were Water (827 acres), Ofﬁ ce (673 acres), and Industrial (668 acres). While the area is primarily ofﬁ ce and industrial, there are many additional types of uses including Kaiser Permanente’s new Anaheim Medical Center, a regional Metrolink Station, a transit-oriented residential development adjacent to the Metrolink Station, various retail commercial uses, a scattering of single family residences, a major waste transfer facility, four large churches, and three private elementary schools. OCWD groundwater recharge basins provide relief from the surrounding urban environment Light industrial architecture inﬂ uences much of the overall character of Anaheim Canyon Retail and commercial services are mostly auto-oriented by design Ofﬁ ce parks typically lack clear pedestrian access or outdoor amenities ---PAGE BREAK--- 20 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s Anaheim Canyon has fairly limited pedestrian or bicycle amenities. The area has many incomplete sidewalks, few shade trees, and minimal street furniture. There are bicycle lanes along Miller, Miraloma, and Lakeview avenues and a bike trail south of the Santa Ana River. Bike lockers are located at the Metrolink Station. Major Land Use and Urban Design Opportunities • Protect and grow Anaheim Canyon as a major economic engine for Orange County through zoning and development standards. • Upgrade and enhance the public realm through coordinated and programmatic streetscape/landscape design. • Coordinate and cooperate with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to identify dual or multi- use opportunities (such as recreation and enhanced stormwater capture/ treatment) in groundwater recharge basins, with careful consideration for OCWD operational and public safety concerns. • Expand opportunities for additional high-density residential, ofﬁ ce, and retail development within ¼ to ½ mile of the Metrolink Station. • Discourage residential or other sensitive uses within industrial areas. • Promote and support strategic commercial sites at major intersections. • Plan for and help create additional amenities for area workers and residents, including parks and open space, recreation, and transportation options. • Take advantage of vacant and underutilized sites throughout Anaheim Canyon. Public transportation amenities are sparse and often lack adequate shelter Expansive use of turf landscaping results in high water demand ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 21 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s 2.3 Mobility Anaheim Canyon has good access to Orange County’s extensive regional freeway network, including the Orange Freeway (State Route 57), Riverside Freeway (State Route 91), Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55), and Imperial Highway (State Route 90). The main arteries in Anaheim Canyon include La Palma Avenue, Kraemer Boulevard, and Tustin Avenue. While the area is primarily auto and truck oriented, there are some existing multimodal options, including a Metrolink Station, bike trails, and bus transit. The area has the right characteristics for increased pedestrian and bicycle mobility (ﬂ at, access to transit, mild climate), but the current system has many gaps and barriers. There is also a lack of basic amenities at many bus stops throughout Anaheim Canyon. Major Mobility Opportunities • Expand multimodal transportation options and create better connections between Anaheim Canyon and surrounding communities. • Create a pedestrian-friendly walking environment by establishing a complete sidewalk network, providing more crosswalks, installing pedestrian bulb-outs, upgrading push buttons and countdown signals, installing pedestrian signals at mid-block crosswalks, providing accessibility between ofﬁ ce and retail land uses, and installing additional pedestrian pathways. • Enhance bicycle facilities by creating bike lanes on major north-south and east-west corridors, including a pedestrian/bicycle corridor along Miraloma Avenue and Miller Road; providing additional bikeways that connect to bus stops; and connecting existing and new bike paths to the regional Santa Ana River Trail via improved road bridges and/or a new pedestrian/bicycle bridge. The Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station provides a regional transit connection Sidewalks are needed in many areas to provide a safe pedestrian environment ---PAGE BREAK--- 22 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s • Improve vehicular facilities by providing consistent lane widths on roads throughout Anaheim Canyon to improve driving conditions and decrease merging congestion (lane drops along the same arterial can lead to unnecessary delay or congestion at merging points); pursuing consistent speed limits along the length of speciﬁ ed arterials to improve roadway trafﬁ c ﬂ ow; providing additional lane capacity at intersections or improved and coordinated signal timing along corridors experiencing high volumes of trafﬁ c; and restriping faded lane stripes and markings. • Work with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to upgrade and create additional bus routes and stops; provide connections to the planned Placentia Metrolink Station; provide safe loading/unloading areas for all riders; improve pedestrian connectivity to transit; encourage shuttles to employment centers; and improve coordination of bus schedules and stops. Wide roadways offer opportunities for improved bicycle and pedestrian amenities Bus shelters can beneﬁ t from better access and sidewalk connections ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 23 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s 2.4 Infrastructure The City of Anaheim has the unique role of being Anaheim Canyon’s water and power provider. The City maintains an adequate and reliable infrastructure system within Anaheim Canyon that has the ability to be expanded to accommodate future growth. In addition, the existing storm drain and sewer systems also have the capacity to accommodate additional development in locations within Anaheim Canyon. The OCWD’s Groundwater Replenishment System pipeline, which delivers highly puriﬁ ed recycled water for groundwater recharge in Anaheim Canyon, can also provide local businesses with high quality water for industrial uses. Anaheim Canyon beneﬁ ts from extensive existing power, natural gas, broadband, and telecommunications networks that can be used to help attract new commercial and industrial uses. Major Infrastructure Opportunities • Promote the existing “capture, clean, and use” strategy for stormwater management. • Retroﬁ t the existing storm drain system with regionally beneﬁ cial improvements including catch basin screening systems; bioﬁ ltration swales and treatment wetlands; and basin impoundments to capture stormwater for inﬁ ltration, passive irrigation of natural open spaces, or habitat creation. • Create more pervious surfaces to help inﬁ ltrate stormwater and recharge local groundwater aquifers. • Consider coordinating with the Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region to initiate regional water quality facilities paid by in- lieu or drainage fees from upstream developments, relieving them of costly and less effective on-site solutions. • Coordinate with the OCWD to expand recycled water supply and delivery to the interested businesses that can beneﬁ t from the high quality recycled water for industrial uses. • Facilitate recycled water distribution to help interested businesses obtain LEED certiﬁ cation. • Support reduction of wastewater generation by installing small on-site sewer water reclamation/recycling plants, balancing ﬂ ow into the sewer system through the installation of on- site low ﬂ ow clariﬁ er units and low ﬂ ow water ﬁ xtures. • Encourage installation of grey water systems which direct certain used water from a building to landscape areas rather than discharging to public sewers. • Continue to move all overhead power and telecommunications lines underground to improve system reliability and aesthetics. • Consider power rate discounts for “clean tech” businesses, and encourage on-site solar energy panels for commercial roof tops and parking structures. • Consider co-developing a public/ private WiFi network that will enable continuous connectivity for workers, visitors, and commercial enterprises. ---PAGE BREAK--- 24 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s 2.5 Sustainability Local and regional sustainability is a very important topic related to both quality of life and economic development. There is a strategic need to make Anaheim Canyon businesses more sustainable to ensure they succeed in the Innovation Economy. In addition to that need, there are also numerous State and regional laws, policies, and programs that require sustainability concepts be implemented at the local level. In 2003 the City of Anaheim joined the California Climate Action Registry. As part of this effort, the City annually tracks and reports greenhouse gas emission totals. The City has an obligation, through a series of State and regional regulations, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve citywide sustainability, and capture/reuse stormwater at new and redeveloped sites. To meet this obligation, the City has already developed an extensive array of green building and sustainability-related programs and incentives. These include very high standards for energy efﬁ ciency, including LEED certiﬁ cation, in City-owned buildings. In addition, in April 2012, the City Council approved the Anaheim Outdoors Connectivity Plan. This study identiﬁ es citywide opportunities for access to open space and recreation areas, including expanding bicycle and pedestrian systems. Major Sustainability Opportunities • Continue to encourage LEED certiﬁ cation on all new buildings. • Protect and rehabilitate open space and habitat areas. • Promote multimodal transportation options throughout Anaheim Canyon, including transit, bike, and pedestrian facilities and amenities. • Support and encourage unique solutions speciﬁ c to Anaheim Canyon, such as increased renewable energy generation, improved stormwater management systems, increased use of industrial waste heat, expanded programs for business owners to utilize bulk purchasing, and reduced vehicle idling. Opportunities exist to replace turf areas with more sustainable landscaping Stormwater planters reduce maintenance costs, lower water use, and ﬁ lter stormwater ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 25 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s 2.6 Identity and Branding Anaheim Canyon currently lacks a unique “sense of place.” It does not have an identity that differentiates it from other Southern California business and industrial centers. Promotion of local businesses and the general area has suffered in the past from inconsistent naming and branding policies. The area has been known as either “The Canyon,” ”Anaheim Canyon Business Center,” or “Anaheim Canyon.” This lack of a uniﬁ ed identity was one of the top issues identiﬁ ed in business and property owner surveys conducted by the City early in the planning process. Major Identity and Branding Opportunities • Create a consistent signage program to unify the entire area, building on existing design elements already located in Anaheim Canyon. • Build an identity and brand that resonates with employers and visitors. • Develop clear brand guidelines for businesses and partners to ensure consistency. • Create gateways that become focal points for arrival and provide a better sense of place. • Create a unique landscape palette for the public realm. • Use the term “Anaheim Canyon” consistently to identify the area. • Expand Anaheim Canyon’s “image” from the freeways for better exposure. Existing “The Canyon” banner sign Existing signage that is inconsistent with the overall brand ---PAGE BREAK--- 26 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s 2.7 Regulatory Setting There are many existing local, regional, State, and Federal laws, regulations, and programs that affect development activities within Anaheim Canyon. The City of Anaheim’s General Plan, which was comprehensively updated in 2004, is the overarching policy document that regulates all development within the City. This Speciﬁ c Plan implements the General Plan by providing greater detail on area- speciﬁ c development policies, standards, and guidelines for Anaheim Canyon. At the regional level, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prepares and administers a Regional Transportation Plan that focuses regional investment on major roadways (in particular freeways), which will have a direct impact on Anaheim Canyon. As part of its regional planning efforts, SCAG has also developed a Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS), which provides a framework for housing and employment growth on a regional level. State law allows projects that are consistent with the SCS to be eligible for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) streamlining. At the State level, there have been major law changes in recent years to focus development permitting on greenhouse gas reduction and sustainability. The two most notable laws are Assembly Bill (AB) 32, which was passed in 2006, and Senate Bill (SB) 375, which was passed in 2008. AB 32 requires local governments to reduce total greenhouse gas emissions to their 1990 levels by 2020. SB 375 implements this law by establishing a direct link between local land use planning and regional transportation planning to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks. The California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358) requires local governments to incorporate Complete Streets policies into planning documents, in particular into a city’s General Plan. As a result of all of these laws, this Speciﬁ c Plan identiﬁ es opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide Complete Streets within Anaheim Canyon. Complete Streets Complete Streets are streets that are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities. They can also include a unique design identity, areas for pedestrian gathering, and systems to capture and ﬁ lter stormwater. In addition to helping create more attractive, accessible, and safer environments, Complete Streets are also required by the State as a means for providing access to multimodal transportation options (Assembly Bill 1358). ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 27 c h a p t e r 2 : k e y f i n d i n g s a n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s The State’s CalGreen Code applies to the planning, design, operation, construction, use, and occupancy of newly constructed residential and non-residential buildings and structures. This updated building code establishes minimum standards that must be met for energy efﬁ ciency construction and green materials. Lastly, the State also requires new development and signiﬁ cant redevelopment to reuse stormwater that falls on these sites. Inﬁ ltration is considered reuse, and the Anaheim Canyon area is the best location in Orange County for this to occur due to soil composition and depth of the water table. At the Federal level, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit program controls water pollution by regulating discharges of pollutants into waters of the State. As a result, virtually all commercial and industrial sites must implement standard “Best Management Practices” on-site to reduce discharge of pollutants to the storm drain system. Certain industrial facilities must also obtain permits from the Santa Ana Region Water Quality Control Board. Major Regulatory Setting Opportunities • Identify strategies to streamline development regulations and encourage economic growth and revitalization. • Clearly articulate how the City of Anaheim is addressing recent State greenhouse gas and sustainability mandates, which will help streamline approvals of future projects that are consistent with this Speciﬁ c Plan. • Continue to coordinate with OCWD to identify opportunities for passive and active recreation adjacent to, or within, areas used for water retention so long as they do not affect the day-to-day operations of OCWD. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 29 The “public realm” (Figure 3-1) includes all land under the direct control of either the City of Anaheim or another public agency. This generally includes all public streets, bike and pedestrian paths, and land owned/operated by the Orange County Water District the Santa Ana River and retention basins) and the Orange County Flood Control District. Focused improvements to the public realm will play a critical role in the long-term success of Anaheim Canyon. The public realm accounts for 38 percent of all land within Anaheim Canyon. The City has an opportunity to focus resources within this area to enhance aesthetics and promote sustainability, both of which will beneﬁ t the private sector and assist economic growth and local job creation. This chapter identiﬁ es the changes needed within the public realm to achieve the Speciﬁ c Plan’s vision. The chapter begins with Transformative Strategies that will be used by the City to implement the vision for the public realm, then outlines overall branding and identity improvements, and proceeds into detailed changes to the mobility and infrastructure networks. These changes include outlining a multimodal transportation network for Anaheim Canyon, to accommodate movement by automobiles, trucks, transit, rail, pedestrians, and bicycles. The chapter concludes with detailed public realm design guidelines that will ensure improvements are consistent, aesthetically pleasing, and meet the City’s sustainability goals. In this Chapter… 3.1 Public Realm Transformative Strategies 3.2 Identity and Branding 3.3 Mobility Improvements 3.4 Open Space Improvements 3.5 Infrastructure Improvements 3.6 Public Realm Design Guidelines chapter 3: public realm improvements The City of Anaheim and other agencies will take a lead role transforming Anaheim Canyon by making speciﬁ c physical improvements to the public realm. ---PAGE BREAK--- 30 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s T placentia orange anaheim bike trail plan area legend water bodies public realm metrolink station city boundary railroad N 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 T ﬁgure 3-1: public realm ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 31 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s 3.1 Public Realm Transformative Strategies The following Transformative Strategies are designed to support the community’s vision for the public realm of Anaheim Canyon. Along with the Private Realm Transformative Strategies in Chapter 4, these strategies help deﬁ ne Anaheim Canyon’s long-term direction, and can be viewed as broad policy statements that will help guide City and other public agency decisions for improvements within the public realm of Anaheim Canyon. 1. Develop an engaging brand and identity that attracts and retains businesses. 2. Create signage and wayﬁ nding elements that connect gateways, centers, and destinations. 3. Create distinctive and recognizable gateways, streetscapes, and open space areas. 4. Ensure easy access and the efﬁ cient movement of goods. 5. Promote a range of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options to enhance mobility, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and foster a healthy environment. 6. Create a safe, accessible, and well- connected pedestrian, bicycle, and transit network. 7. Ensure access to efﬁ cient and appropriately sized infrastructure and utilities. 8. Promote green and eco-friendly infrastructure to enhance the brand and sense of place. ---PAGE BREAK--- 32 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s building a brand for anaheim canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 33 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s 3.2 Identity and Branding As a focus of the overall economic development strategy of the Speciﬁ c Plan, the City and local business community desire to establish a distinctive brand for Anaheim Canyon. The area has a wide range of to support a vibrant and economically successful future. However, surveys and focus groups conducted during the Speciﬁ c Plan update process indicated that business owners, property owners, real estate brokers, residents, and the general public do not associate Anaheim Canyon with a particular brand. The lack of an existing brand is based on several elements, including inconsistent signage, limited promotions, and a lack of a central place or icon that is memorable. Why is a Brand Important? The importance of a unique brand for Anaheim Canyon is multi-faceted, but primarily relates to bolstering economic advantage for local businesses. By building a reputation for the area based on the Speciﬁ c Plan’s vision, Anaheim Canyon will become more recognized and people will want to connect their business endeavors and relationships with the area. Elements of the Anaheim Canyon Brand A successful place-based brand is memorable if it reﬂ ects a reputation, a sense of place, and qualities distinctive to a particular area. This kind of brand must be built and maintained through City policies and actions, collaborations with the business community, marketing and promotions, and physical improvements. As part of the Speciﬁ c Plan process, the City determined that the best approach was to promote the existing Anaheim Canyon name rather than trying to create a new one. A commitment to the Anaheim Canyon moniker provides the opportunity to immediately begin work on fully establishing and promoting the brand. In addition to the name, there is also an opportunity to build a brand that supports the area’s vision for becoming an innovative, sustainable, and business- friendly commerce center. Key elements include: • Establishing Anaheim Canyon as cutting edge and high-tech; • Promoting green and innovative manufacturing; • Supporting sustainable building design and business operations; • Expanding mobility options; • Ensuring aesthetically-pleasing street- scapes with enhanced lighting; and • Expanding stormwater retention and groundwater recharge. Integrating the Brand Throughout the Public Realm The City has the greatest capability to shape the brand through thoughtfully- designed improvements within the public realm. Throughout this chapter the brand is expressed in text, graphics, and photo examples. This includes both speciﬁ c physical improvements to the area’s roads and streetscapes as well as public realm design guidelines that provide a framework for the City to follow when selecting the colors, textures, and the placement of new features in Anaheim Canyon. ---PAGE BREAK--- 34 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s 3.3 Mobility Improvements The ability to efﬁ ciently move people and goods into, through, and out of Anaheim Canyon is essential to protecting and enhancing the area’s economic vitality and long-term sustainability, while also improving the quality of life for local residents and workers. The Anaheim Canyon area beneﬁ ts from having multiple access options, including convenient access to Orange County’s extensive regional freeway network, a local Metrolink Station, extensive Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus transit services, and an existing bicycle and pedestrian trail system. However, there is a great need to increase options for non-vehicular travel to and through Anaheim Canyon. This includes the need to improve roadways, expand bus transit service, expand the pedestrian and bicycle network, and create more opportunities for commuter rail travel. This section outlines the City’s strategy for providing a comprehensive, multimodal transportation network for Anaheim Canyon that builds upon the existing backbone system. While there is an extensive existing transportation system that connects Anaheim Canyon to locations both inside and outside of the area, there are several areas where the accessibility could be improved. This enhanced circulation network will help accommodate all modes of travel for a wide range of users, help provide better access and safety for residents and workers, and help ensure the efﬁ cient movement of commercial goods. Combined, these strategies will help the City dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Improved bicycle and transit facilities offer an opportunity to expand accessibility along less traveled streets ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 35 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Roadways Roadway Classiﬁ cations The City of Anaheim deﬁ nes a series of Roadway Classiﬁ cations in its General Plan in order to administer engineering design standards and trafﬁ c operation performance standards, and to develop a unique function and characteristic for each street. The system is based on the functional classiﬁ cation hierarchy which orders streets in terms of their mobility and access functions. Figure 3-2 shows the Roadway Classiﬁ cation system for Anaheim Canyon. The following are general deﬁ nitions of each roadway classiﬁ cation: • Major Arterial. Roadways that carry a large volume of regional through trafﬁ c not handled by the freeway system. Typically, these roadways have six lanes, a landscaped median, left turn pockets, bike lanes, and a right-of-way width of 120 feet. Major arterials carrying over 45,000 vehicles per day typically contain eight lanes with a right-of-way width of 144 feet. • Primary Arterial. Roadways that provide for circulation within the City and to its adjacent communities. Primary arterials are typically six lane divided facilities with no parking, or four lane divided with left turn pockets and two parking lanes. The typical right-of-way width of a primary arterial is 106 feet. • Secondary Arterial. Roadways that provide for circulation within the City. Secondary arterial facilities are four lane undivided roadways with two parking lanes. These facilities have a typical right-of-way width of 90 feet. • Complete Streets Collector. Roadways that distribute local trafﬁ c from its point of origin to higher capacity facilities. They include enhanced multimodal features to ensure the efﬁ cient and safe movement of all forms of travel including automobile, truck, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian. They are typically two lane undivided roadways with a 90-foot right-of-way width. • Collector Street. Roadways that distribute local trafﬁ c from its point of origin to higher capacity facilities. They are typically two lane undivided roadways with a 64-foot right-of-way width. • Industrial Interior. Roadways that provide access from higher capacity facilities to individual properties, alleys, or driveways. They are typically two lane undivided roadways with a 76-foot right-of-way width. ---PAGE BREAK--- 36 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe w eiv e k al kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum d le ﬁ h cir red gum fee ana n e r u b n a v n o sr e ff ej hunter white star g g o lle k chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune o r e s s a n a m brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail y e r p s o la palma miraloma coronado la jolla a tsiv o ir lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln lle s s al g tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr d le ﬁ h cir orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden pedestrian path/trail * planned bikeway * existing bikeway * railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-2: roadway classiﬁcation roadway classiﬁcation primary arterial freeway major arterial collector secondary arterial complete streets collector ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 37 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Complete Streets Improvements One of the major objectives of the Speciﬁ c Plan is to provide more mobility options within Anaheim Canyon for visitors, workers, and residents. The term “Complete Streets” refers to a shift in emphasis from auto-centric streets to ones that are designed for all forms of travel. These types of streets address the safe accommodation of all users, including motorists, public transit users, bicyclists, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Complete Streets concepts include fully constructed sidewalks and crosswalks with landscaping, bulb-outs at intersections, dedicated right-of-way for buses, grade- separations, on-street parking, and bicycle lanes. Not only do Complete Streets help promote efﬁ cient travel, safety, and healthy lifestyles, they are also a requirement of State law. In Anaheim Canyon, it is not practical to require that all streets be transformed into Complete Streets, since truck trafﬁ c must continue to be prioritized on many streets in order to maintain efﬁ ciency Incorporating Complete Streets and Green Street features will offer a more sustainable environment that expands mobility and access at the human scale ---PAGE BREAK--- 38 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s for industrial businesses. Consequently, the Speciﬁ c Plan designates Miraloma Avenue and Miller Street as Complete Streets Collectors that will include these enhanced features (see Figure 3-3). This designation signiﬁ es enhanced transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Bus stops will be upgraded to include proper shelter, lighting, and loading areas. These streets will include striped bicycle lanes along the entire corridor in both directions and high-visibility crosswalks at intersections. Bulb-outs may be provided at locations where on-street parking is provided adjacent to intersections and crosswalks. Mid-block crosswalks will also be created at key locations to provide increased connectivity. The designation of Miraloma Avenue and Miller Street will require an amendment to OCTA’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). Roadway Improvements In addition to Complete Streets improvements, a number of other physical roadway improvements are necessary in order to implement the Speciﬁ c Plan as identiﬁ ed in Figure 3-3. These include modiﬁ cations to existing roadway sizing and lane widths, additions of new pedestrian crosswalks, and modiﬁ cations to intersection signals. A full list of speciﬁ c actions and individual projects is included in Chapter 5. In addition, the Speciﬁ c Plan includes updated street cross section diagrams for all major streets in Anaheim Canyon. These diagrams are located in Appendix A. Freeway Improvements Commerce in Anaheim Canyon is dependent on having convenient access to regional freeways, including the Orange Freeway (State Route 57), Riverside Freeway (State Route 91), Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55), and Richard Nixon Freeway/Imperial Highway (State Route 90). OCTA is currently working with Caltrans on several freeway projects that will improve Anaheim Canyon’s regional connectivity. See Chapter 5 for a speciﬁ c list of freeway improvements. Expanding of existing on-ramps will provide greater regional access for Anaheim Canyon Shortening crosswalks with bulb-outs will improve pedestrian safety ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 39 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T chrisden la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana van buren jefferson hunter white star kellogg chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune manassero brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa Recommended bulbouts at Miraloma Avenue and Miller Street. High visibily crosswalks are recommended if bulbouts are not feasible. 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim 8-lane facility 6-lane facility 2-lane facility railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T plan area legend complete street collector roadway modiﬁcation signal modiﬁcation high visibility crosswalk crosswalk 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-3: future roadway improvements ---PAGE BREAK--- 40 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Due to its relatively ﬂ at geography and grid street pattern, Anaheim Canyon is an ideal location for expanding pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The Speciﬁ c Plan strongly encourages the creation of new and improved facilities as a means to promote a healthier lifestyle and provide better access to homes, retail, jobs, transit, and parking. In particular, creating a complete network of accessible sidewalks is a priority for Anaheim Canyon. Figure 3-4 shows areas within Anaheim Canyon that currently have incomplete sidewalks. While a complete sidewalk network is the ultimate goal of the Speciﬁ c Plan, certain streets should receive priority for pedestrian improvements. Most pedestrian improvements will occur through the addition of sidewalks along all roadways, crosswalks at major intersections, and crosswalks at select mid-block locations. The addition of these pedestrian facilities will create a more complete multimodal network for Anaheim Canyon. The Bicycle Plan (Figure 3-5) shows the overall bicycle connectivity plan for Anaheim Canyon. In addition to the roadway improvements and new trails, the bicycle plan also identiﬁ es some larger projects needed to improve bicycle mobility and safety. Key pedestrian and bicycle connections include: 1. A pedestrian and bicycle access tunnel and walkway between the Metrolink Station and Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center; 2. A pedestrian and bicycle undercrossing beneath Tustin Avenue that connects the Metrolink Station to the Santa Ana River Trail system; and 3. A bicycle and pedestrian bridge across the Santa Ana River just east of Riverside Freeway. Bus Transit Bus transit routes, and the increased awareness of these services, will dramatically increase how efﬁ ciently people move to and throughout Anaheim Canyon. Figure 3-6: Bus Transit shows bus service operated by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN). Creating a complete network of sidewalks will provide greater connectivity and safety for pedestrians ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 41 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail chrisden T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana van buren jefferson hunter white star kellogg chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune manassero brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim incomplete sidewalks railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-4: incomplete sidewalks ---PAGE BREAK--- 42 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana van buren jefferson hunter white star kellogg chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune manassero brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden planned pedestrian path/trail planned bikeway existing bikeway railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-5: bicycle plan ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 43 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s The City will continue to coordinate with OCTA and ATN to identify potential opportunities for new routes or modiﬁ cations to existing routes as new development or redevelopment occus in Anaheim Canyon. In an effort to expand transit services, the City will work with OCTA and ATN to develop a comprehensive Transit Awareness Package that includes a quick reference guide of transit service and schedules so people can easily navigate through Anaheim Canyon. Railroads and Metrolink Stations The northern gateways to Anaheim Canyon have recently been improved by OCTA constructing several grade- separated crossings along the BNSF railroad track. These crossings are located at Kraemer Boulevard, Tustin Avenue, Orangethorpe Avenue, and Lakeview Avenue and improve connectivity and safety while maintaining goods movement. These improvements are anticipated to be completed by 2016. The Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station serves the Inland Empire - Orange County line, which operates eight northbound and eight southbound trains per weekday. Metrolink also plans to increase rail service to an anticipated 21 daily trips by 2020 (30-minute headways). OCTA is also planning to make signiﬁ cant improvements to Metrolink service within and near Anaheim Canyon. Plans for the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station include a redesign with new bus bays at the front of the station, additional parking, enhanced loading areas, and upgrades to the platform. In addition, OCTA is planning a new Placentia Metrolink Station which will be a part of the Metrolink 91 Line extending from Riverside/Fullerton to downtown Los Angeles. This station will be located within a quarter-mile of Anaheim Canyon and will provide a valuable opportunity to expand commuter rail service to the area. It is anticipated that feeder service to this station would be provided through a reconﬁ guration of existing bus routes, new bus routes, or a combination of the two. OCTA’s addition of new transit routes will have a direct impact on how people travel to and throughout Anaheim Canyon A new Placentia Metrolink Station will broaden commuter rail access to Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 44 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T chrisden 30 3 411 24 167 71 38 153 213a 213 38 129 213 213a 17 794 30 la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview frontera blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana jefferson hunter white star chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock dune manassero gretta hawk armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! m ! m ! m ! ma m ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 55! 55 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 21 ! n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ma ! ma ! an an an an an an a ! ma man ! k k ! er b er b ! me mer bl ! ! ! b bl bl ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! nas g ! railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T plan area legend Route 24 Route 213 Route 213a Route 167 Route 30 Route 71 Route 38 Route 153 Route 411 Art Route 17 ! Route 794 Bus Stops 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-6: existing transit ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 45 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s 3.4 Open Space Improvements Open space areas play an important role in the overall aesthetics and quality of life in Anaheim Canyon. Nearly one third of all the land in Anaheim Canyon is located within the Open Space/Water Development Area (see Chapter Protecting visual and physical access to these areas can play a key role in branding, economic development, and the ability of the City to retain and attract businesses to the area. All of the land within the Open Space/ Water Development area is owned and controlled by the Orange County Water District (OCWD). While it is important to increase public access to open space areas, it is also important to ensure that OCWD can continue to conduct groundwater recharge activities in a safe and efﬁ cient manner. Three potential open space improvements have been identiﬁ ed for Anaheim Canyon: • Basin Turf Conversion. This project would convert approximately 10.8 acres of irrigated and inaccessible turf into California-friendly planting with trails and seating areas around Kraemer Basin, Anaheim Lake, and Warner Basin. These improvements would be done in close coordination with OCWD. They would be made outside of the existing fenced area and would not interfere with OCWD operations. • Metrolink Station Connection. This project is intended to increase bicycle and pedestrian mobility and safety between the Metrolink Station and the Santa Ana River Trail. Major project components include a bridge across the Santa Ana River and an undercrossing beneath Tustin Avenue. • Waterway Trail Connection. This project broadens the overall pedestrian and bicycle connectivity of Anaheim Canyon by leveraging available open space connectors, and capitalizing on the available views to area lakes and the Santa Ana River. Key components include developing additional off-road trail connections through select OCWD areas to the 110- mile regional Santa Ana River Trail; and creating an interconnected set of loop trails for pedestrians and bicyclists as a form of local recreation for Anaheim Canyon residents and workers. ---PAGE BREAK--- 46 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s 3.5 Infrastructure Improvements Anaheim Canyon is supported by an extensive infrastructure network that serves area residents and businesses. The physical and economic prosperity of businesses within the area are dependent on this network and on the availability of the necessary resources. Most of the existing infrastructure within Anaheim Canyon is adequate to serve existing and future businesses, although it is aging and will require periodic upgrade and expansion. As businesses in Anaheim Canyon continue to grow in intensity, the City will focus its efforts on providing an adequate level of service to accommodate existing uses and the projected growth. One key focus will be to identify solutions to create more sustainable infrastructure that relies on fewer natural resources. This will be done through the implementation of sustainable infrastructure at all scales to support the backbone functions of a re- envisioned public realm. Following is a description of the proposed infrastructure system for Anaheim Canyon. The improvements suggested will help facilitate Anaheim Canyon’s transformation to a more sustainable and efﬁ cient area. This transformation includes demonstrating how infrastructure can support existing and new development while promoting sustainable objectives of conservation, efﬁ ciency, and natural resource protection. Speciﬁ c actions and improvements to the infrastructure system that are necessary to implement the Speciﬁ c Plan are identiﬁ ed in Chapter 5. Water System Anaheim ﬁ rst initiated its municipal water delivery system in 1879. Most of the City’s water has historically been supplied by groundwater wells in the Santa Ana River Corridor. Originally intended for agricultural uses, the well ﬁ elds were gradually expanded into a reliable source of drinking water for the now urbanized City. The wells tap into the regional groundwater aquifer, which is managed by OCWD. OCWD directs annual supply allotments to the agencies it serves and has the ﬂ exibility to overdraft the basin during dry periods and replenish the basin later in wet years. The local groundwater is supplemented by imported water purchased from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). MWD provides treated and untreated water supplies to Southern California via a regional network of lakes, pipelines, and canals delivering water from the Colorado River and Northern California. Using local groundwater is much more Expanding pedestrian and bicycle routes will help connect the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station to the Santa Ana River Trail Converting irrigated turf areas to drought- tolerant, California native landscaping will reduce water use and maintenance costs Installing off-road bicycle amenities will broaden bicycle and pedestrian connectivity with the Santa Ana River Trail ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 47 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s environmentally and economically sustainable since it limits expensive and energy-intensive imported MWD water. Anaheim Canyon beneﬁ ts from this locally sourced water which is also of a very high quality, with low mineral content and total dissolved solids. This naturally “puriﬁ ed” groundwater requires only chlorination. Anaheim Canyon receives its water supply via an extensive network of delivery lines primarily made of large diameter steel and ductile iron pipe, as shown in the Domestic Water Facilities Plan (Figure 3-7). This pipeline network is fed from the City’s Linda Vista water supply center, known as the “heart” of the City’s water system. The Linda Vista facility serves all of Anaheim Canyon and portions of Anaheim Hills and the Flatland Area. The Linda Vista facility is comprised of groundwater wells, pumping facilities (with backup power), and a four million gallon (MG) storage reservoir. The system delivers ﬁ re ﬂ ow pressure, ﬂ ow, and volumes while meeting all required emergency storage standards. Nonetheless, the system is aging and the City has embarked on a replacement/expansion project to replace the four MG reservoir and pump station and add a three MG sister reservoir. The new reservoir tanks will be pre-stressed concrete, designed to the latest seismic standards, and partially buried for aesthetic purposes. The pipeline network extends throughout Anaheim Canyon for full coverage, but is aging and has several segments that were installed over 40 years ago. The City’s annual inspection and replacement/repair program helps ensure reliable service. As a result, there have been no repeated or large failures in the area. Anaheim Canyon also beneﬁ ts from noncorrosive and well-draining soils. The City currently has identiﬁ ed two main pipeline segments to be improved. These new arteries will ensure the Linda Vista facility can continue to meet current and future potable water and ﬁ re ﬂ ow demands. Overall, the City’s domestic water system is well positioned to serve existing and future businesses within Anaheim Canyon. It is also well planned for expansion, and implementation of the Linda Vista Master Plan will help ensure adequate future water supplies to existing and new businesses. Recycled Water Southern California is an arid climate region that relies on large amounts of imported water from the Colorado River and Northern California. Although groundwater fortiﬁ es this supply, it too is subject to long-term drought cycles. Studies have shown the urbanization of the region is consuming water at very high rates with little or no increase in supply. As a result, the State of California has adopted strict conservation rules and directed local municipalities to reduce water consumption. The most effective means to meet these increasingly important standards is by using recycled water. Use of recycled water can dramatically reduce demand for potable water. Although commonly used as a source for landscape irrigation, recycled water can also be used in manufacturing, power generation (cooling), and other industrial processes. Many cities in Southern California have begun to provide recycled water from locally operated sewage treatment plants which collect “used” water and treat it for “reuse,” typically via a three step process: Primary (solids removal and clarifying); Secondary (biological treatment); and Tertiary (complete chemical treatment). Most ---PAGE BREAK--- 48 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe w eiv e k al kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum d le ﬁ h cir red gum fee ana n e r u b n a v n o sr e ff ej hunter white star g g o lle k chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune o r e s s a n a m brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail y e r p s o la palma miraloma coronado la jolla a tsiv o ir lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln lle s s al g tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr d le ﬁ h cir orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden pedestrian path/trail * planned bikeway * existing bikeway * railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-7: domestic water facilities plan domestic water service line ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 49 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s recycled water systems in Orange County use tertiary level treatment for landscape irrigation. Anaheim Canyon beneﬁ ts from a recent partnership between the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and OCWD to treat wastewater and produce highly puriﬁ ed recycled water for groundwater replenishment. The agencies installed a main stem line along the Santa Ana River, which was brought into Anaheim Canyon via the Carbon Canyon Drainage Channel crossing and extended to Anaheim Lakes (near Miraloma Avenue and North Miller). This highly puriﬁ ed recycled water is currently being used at the Anaheim Canyon Power Plant for cooling and landscape irrigation, and has the potential to be used for many additional public and private uses. The City of Anaheim conducted a citywide study that included an evaluation of the use of this recycled water in Anaheim Canyon. The study identiﬁ ed a Phase I implementation plan for the Anaheim Canyon area, as shown in the Recycled Water Facilities Plan (Figure 3-8). The study identiﬁ ed potential users, predicted daily and peak demand ﬂ ows, and considered existing as well as future growth conditions. From these metrics, a pipeline layout was done and a cost estimate prepared. The study is a road map for the City to follow, and the Phase I layout can be the ﬁ rst step in an area-wide system enabling “green” industrial users and businesses or residents to reduce potable water demand. Groundwater Basin Recharge OCWD is responsible for managing the vast groundwater basin that provides most of northern and central Orange County’s drinking water. As part of its groundwater management, OCWD maintains an advanced managed aquifer recharge system to replace the water that is pumped from about 400 wells belonging to local water agencies, cities, and other groundwater users. OCWD currently owns approximately 840 acres within Anaheim Canyon (roughly 30 percent of the total area), making it the largest single property owner in the area. This land is principally used for groundwater recharge and includes eight detention basins and the Santa Ana River. The primary reason OCWD owns so much land in Anaheim Canyon is that the area’s soil is sandy and coarse-grained, which allows water to easily percolate into the deep aquifers. These areas are a critical resource not only for Anaheim residents, but also for all of Orange County. Stormwater Management Stormwater Management is a broad topic that includes local and regional infrastructure, such as open channels and underground storm drains. It also includes on-site capture and treatment systems such as pervious pavement and bio-swales. These technologies are an important priority throughout Southern California because of the continued paving of natural areas, tightened regulations issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Boards, and the increased need for sustainable management of groundwater and surface water supplies. The City of Anaheim currently has a master planned network of underground storm drains as shown in the latest studies for East Anaheim: • Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary areas, September 2010; and • Master Plan of Storm Drainage for ---PAGE BREAK--- 50 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe w eiv e k al kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum d le ﬁ h cir red gum fee ana n e r u b n a v n o sr e ff ej hunter white star g g o lle k chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune o r e s s a n a m brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail y e r p s o la palma miraloma coronado la jolla a tsiv o ir lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln lle s s al g tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr d le ﬁ h cir orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden pedestrian path/trail * planned bikeway * existing bikeway * railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-8: recycled water facilities plan existing groundwater recharge supply line (OCWD) existing recycled water source line future recycled water source line (phase I) ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 51 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s North and West Santa Ana River Tributary Areas (2013 ongoing). Although adequate, these pipelines and channels were constructed to runoff standards that are now outdated. New ﬂ ood analysis standards and urbanization more impervious surfaces) have led the City to prepare district-by- district capital improvement plans to improve ﬂ ood protection. The City also has developed and implemented a robust series of programs ensuring compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Municipal Stormwater Permit requirements. Prominent among these programs is the New Development component, which requires stormwater treatment devices (such as inﬁ ltration basins, underground storage and inﬁ ltration “galleries,” bio- swales, and permeable pavements) at new and redeveloped sites. In addition, future building and development projects are required to participate in both ﬂ ood control improvements (through assessment area fees) and water quality compliance (on-site treatment). Anaheim Canyon has a viable network of City-maintained underground storm drains that connect to the Santa Ana River by way of the Atwood Channel, East Richﬁ eld Storm Drain, Deerﬁ eld Storm Channel, Carbon Creek Diversion Channel, and the Carbon Creek Channel; as well as several direct connections, as shown in the Storm Drain Facilities Plan (Figure 3-9). There are currently no major Capital Improvement Projects for ﬂ ood control in Anaheim Canyon, as most of the localized ﬂ ooding issues Anaheim experiences are located in the western and central parts of the city. New development that may increase stormwater runoff would be required to detain the peak ﬂ ow on-site in a privately funded and operated detention facility. Anaheim Canyon also beneﬁ ts from having extremely well drained soils that enable stormwater runoff to be inﬁ ltrated on-site effectively, which reduces infrastructure costs. In the future, as new buildings and parking lots place pressure on the existing storm drain system, stormwater capture and treatment systems could be supplemented with conversion of select open space areas to treatment areas. There are also locations where open space could be converted into “sub-regional” or district level treatment zones that would reduce the requirements for upstream stormwater treatment for new buildings. The Importance of Groundwater Groundwater in Anaheim Canyon is water that is contained in the vast underground aquifer system located beneath most of northern Orange County. It is different from surface water, which includes water in rivers, streams, and lakes. Today, Orange County’s groundwater basin supplies nearly 75 percent of the water needs for residents and businesses in Anaheim and surrounding communities. ---PAGE BREAK--- 52 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe w eiv e k al kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum d le ﬁ h cir red gum fee ana n e r u b n a v n o sr e ff ej hunter white star g g o lle k chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune o r e s s a n a m brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail y e r p s o la palma miraloma coronado la jolla a tsiv o ir lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln lle s s al g riverdale crescent rd santa ana canyon kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr d le ﬁ h cir orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange chrisden pedestrian path/trail * planned bikeway * existing bikeway * railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-9: storm drain facilities plan storm drain main service line water quality treatment & re-use opportunity tustin anaheim imperial hwy ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 53 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Sanitary Sewer The City of Anaheim, like most North Orange County cities, relies on OCSD for regional collection and full treatment of municipal sewage. Efﬂ uent is currently treated to a secondary level for discharge in an ocean outfall or treated to advanced levels for pumping upstream and recharge into the groundwater basin. OCSD has a regional collection trunkline following the Santa Ana River corridor that serves eastern Anaheim, including Anaheim Canyon, as shown in the Sanitary Sewer Facilities Plan (Figure 3-10). The City operates and maintains a municipal sewer collection system that connects to OCSD trunklines. This system has performed well as shown in the Combined East Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (December 2005) that guides expansion, extensions, and replacement projects. There are numerous improvement projects planned for adding collection and conveyance capacity that generally involve adding pipelines or enlarging existing lines. The City’s sanitary sewer system in Anaheim Canyon continues to perform well and meet the needs of local users. There are Capital Improvement Plans for enhanced performance necessary to meet growth expectations, including two pipeline segments. The system has no reports of ﬂ ow disruptions or spills in recent years and the City maintains a vigorous program of inspection, repair, and segment replacement to assure uninterrupted service. Implementation of the City’s domestic water conservation programs will reduce efﬂ uent discharge to the sewer system. Aggressively pursuing these policies will allow more users on the current collection system, saving costs for new sewer infrastructure. Utilities Anaheim Canyon beneﬁ ts from an extensive and reliable utility network for power, gas, broadband, and telecommunications service. The area has not suffered from unusual or frequent service interruptions and the systems continue to provide energy and information to businesses and residents. System expansion needs are incremental and user based, as the area is completely developed. The Groundwater Replenishment System supplies treated puriﬁ ed recycled water to the recharge facilities in Anaheim Canyon Installing recycled water carrying “purple pipe” supports water conservation and eases efﬂ uent discharges to existing sewer lines ---PAGE BREAK--- 54 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe w eiv e k al kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum d le ﬁ h cir red gum fee ana n e r u b n a v n o sr e ff ej hunter white star g g o lle k landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle o r e s s a n a m brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter grove y e r p s o la palma miraloma coronado la jolla a tsiv o ir lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln lle s s al g tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr d le ﬁ h cir orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-10: sanitary sewer facilities plan sewer service line ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 55 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Power Electrical power is a critical resource that is necessary for the nation’s ﬁ nancial, educational, commerce and trade, transportation, and manufacturing systems. A robust and efﬁ cient power system is critical to fostering economic development. More than 142 million electric customers in the United States demand in excess of 4.2 trillion kilowatt hours of electricity annually, and over the next 20 years that demand is expected to grow by more than 20 percent. Consider the potential stress on the grid from plug- in electric vehicles (PEVs) alone, with an estimated 20 million expected to be in use by 2030. The City of Anaheim understands the importance of power and has focused on system reliability. The City provides electrical power throughout Anaheim via 1,500 circuit miles sourced from diverse locations throughout the Western United States. The City operates a Utility Department efﬁ ciently servicing customers and maintaining the power system. It also recently constructed a natural gas ﬁ red power plant in Anaheim Canyon to ensure a reliable and balanced power supply, even during peak usage. The construction of the power plant included a considerable amount of overhead line undergrounding. Much of the power delivery system in the area is on overhead lines, but the City has an aggressive undergrounding program and aims to convert all overhead lines to underground conduit for improved reliability, better aesthetics, lower maintenance, and long- term cost advantages. This program, however, only applies to City-operated power lines, and not the high-power transmission lines owned and operated by Southern California Edison. Natural Gas Natural gas is a plentiful and relatively inexpensive source of energy in Southern California. The Southern California Gas Company has a citywide gas pipeline service network and maintains it for service by direct agreement with each end user, including all homes and businesses in Anaheim Canyon. The City’s Canyon Power Plant provides locally generated electricity during peak demand and reduces out-of-state resource need Undergrounding existing overhead lines will improve reliability, aesthetics, and maintenance costs ---PAGE BREAK--- 56 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Broadband and Telecommunications The City has both a ﬁ ber optic system for broadband internet service (City Fiber) and a cable telecommunications system (Time Warner-AT&T). These systems serve Anaheim Canyon and the broader city with high caliber information at best-in-class service levels. Solid Waste Solid waste collection, processing, transportation and disposal or reuse is often ignored as a part of the overall infrastructure system. The approach taken in this Speciﬁ c Plan is to include it as a key component of the “green” or environmentally sustainable goals the City seeks to achieve. The City currently provides businesses and residents with a full spectrum of solid waste disposal that includes routine trash removal (curbside and commercial containers), special trip removals (three times/year free for residents and a nominal charge for commercial uses), a medical waste program, and a restaurant food waste composting pilot program. The City has been successful at diverting landﬁ ll waste through its effective and diligent management of the waste stream and through recycling efforts. The waste collection is contracted out to Republic Services, who sorts the collected waste to recover recyclable materials and salvage. Anaheim Canyon continues to be well served by the City-directed solid waste removal and disposal program. The County of Orange also operates a household hazardous waste center at La Palma Avenue and Blue Gum Street, a convenient depot for batteries, ﬂ uorescent bulbs, paints, and other special waste. A substantial and privately operated metal recycling site exists in the Anaheim Canyon area, operated by SA Recycling. These local disposal sites are conveniently located for existing and future businesses in Anaheim Canyon. City Fiber and Time Warner-AT&T provide broadband and telecommunications at a best-in-class service level for Anaheim Canyon Recently installed solar powered trash compactors provide convenience and reduce litter at the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 57 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s 3.6 Public Realm Design Guidelines Changes to the public realm will play a crucial role in deﬁ ning Anaheim Canyon’s brand, functionality, and overall quality of life for residents and workers. As mentioned earlier in this chapter, the City anticipates making ongoing improvements to the public realm in the coming years to improve the functionality and aesthetics of these spaces. In order to achieve this, the following design guidelines were developed to provide direction for City departments and consultants regarding the design and placement of improved roadways, signage, street furniture, public art, and landscaping. The ultimate goal is to ensure public realm improvements result in a well deﬁ ned, sustainable, beautiful, and coherent environment that promotes economic development and improves the quality of life for area workers and residents. The Public Realm Design Guidelines include: • Gateways • Green Street Features • Complete Streets • Signage and Wayﬁ nding • Public Art • Street Furniture and Lighting • Renewable Energy Facilities • Sustainable Plant Pallette Design concepts for the public realm strike a balance between the needs of all users whether pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorists ---PAGE BREAK--- 58 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Gateways Intent. Create unique and special entry points that provide a sense of arrival, showcase the green industrial character of the area, and promote the overall brand of Anaheim Canyon. Gateways that are targeted for these improvements are shown in Figure 3-11. 1. Create well deﬁ ned gateways into Anaheim Canyon through the use of distinctive monument signage, plant selection and placement, and public art. 2. Utilize opportunities within the public right-of-way at key perimeter intersections and approaches into Anaheim Canyon to deﬁ ne entry and create a sense place. 3. Install gateway monument signage and amenities at the Metrolink Station platform to announce a sense of arrival into Anaheim Canyon. Ensure that these features are elegantly designed and contribute to the overall character of Anaheim Canyon. 4. Focus near-term gateway improvements in the following areas: Tustin Avenue and State Route 91; Kraemer Avenue and State Route 91; and the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink station (with the ultimate goal to improve all gateways shown on Figure 3-11). Broad, planted medians in gateways can denote a sense of arrival, provide opportunities for public art, and deﬁ ne a unique identity Gateway signage should be elegant in design and contribute to the overall character of Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 59 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s bike trail T bike trail bike trail bike trail bike trail T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana van buren jefferson hunter white star kellogg chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune manassero brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman proposed placentia metrolink station melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden pedestrian path/trail * planned bikeway * existing bikeway * railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N ﬁgure 3-11: primary gateways gateway ---PAGE BREAK--- 60 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Green Street Features Intent: Create and maintain a system of streets that capture stormwater runoff, ﬁ lter pollutants, replenish groundwater supplies, provide habitat for wildlife, and help Anaheim Canyon develop a sustainable identity as an environmentally- friendly industrial and commerce district. 1. Consider the adoption of updated citywide standards for streets, parking lots, and landscaped areas, enabling proven bioﬁ ltration treatment features to be integrated in public thoroughfares and private development projects. 2. Install naturally drained, landscaped stormwater planters where possible, exploring the transition from piped to natural percolation and including these planters on sidewalks, medians, bulb-outs, quasi-public parks, and plazas. 3. Encourage the use of permeable paving materials or porous asphalt within the public realm along parking lanes, in surface parking areas, and around tree wells with natural drainage instead of planter strips to increase inﬁ ltration of stormwater runoff. 4. Use low-maintenance native or drought-tolerant plant species in streetscape landscaping to minimize water consumption and maintenance; and discourage use of turf, grass, or landscaping that requires high water usage (see Sustainable Plant Palette). 5. Explore the ﬁ nancing, creation, and maintenance mechanisms of “sub-regional” or district level treatment zones with structural and non-structural municipal stormwater treatment facilities to assist in maximizing the development potential of physically constrained sites. Stormwater planters placed along sidewalks help manage stormwater and enhance the pedestrian experience along the street edge Using permeable pavers offers inﬁ ltration for stormwater runnoff ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 61 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Complete Streets Intent: Create and maintain streets that enable safe, attractive, and comfortable access and travel for all users (including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and public transport users of all ages and abilities) by reducing and slowing trafﬁ c. 1. Improve Miller Avenue and Miraloma Avenue as Complete Streets Collectors to provide a proper balance between driving, parking, walking, and biking interests of all users. 2. Provide clearly marked crosswalks with a minimum width of 10 feet at all controlled intersections. 3. Ensure that all crosswalks have ramps and warning strips that comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. 4. Where feasible, provide on-street parking to slow trafﬁ c and provide an additional buffer for pedestrians. 5. Incorporate bulb-outs at intersections and at pedestrian crossing locations to reduce crossing distances. Bulb- outs may be designed to function as pocket plazas with pedestrian amenities such as landscaping seating, trash receptacles and bicycle racks. Complete Streets safely and efﬁ ciently accommodate all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and automobile drivers ---PAGE BREAK--- 62 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s 6. Provide pedestrian-friendly transit facilities bus shelters and benches and connecting sidewalks). 7. Ensure that all streets have continuous sidewalks with a minimum width of ﬁ ve feet. 8. Promote outdoor dining on private property within Development Areas 3, 4 and 5 that is adjacent to public sidewalks or other public spaces. 9. Provide appropriate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within Development Area 3 to reduce conﬂ icts between pedestrians and automobiles. 10. Consider development of new mid- block pedestrian crossing locations on Miller Street, Miraloma Avenue, La Palma Avenue, Kraemer Boulevard, and Tustin Avenue when justiﬁ ed by a pedestrian trafﬁ c study, in conjunction with site development or in response to additional pedestrian activity. 11. Install bike lanes or “bike sharrows” to designate Class II and III bike facilities. 12. Plant street trees to help articulate the street edge and open spaces, provide pedestrians a safety buffer from trafﬁ c, and offer shade and wind protection along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways. 13. Ensure street tree placement does not interfere with truck circulation, obstruct pedestrian or bicycle circulation patterns, hinder visibility of any users of the street, or obscure signage. 14. Ensure at least a 12-foot tree canopy clearance from the ﬁ nished sidewalk elevation to provide clear emergency and service access, allow light penetration from pedestrian- scale street lights, and create visual connections between buildings, signage, the sidewalk, and the roadway. Separation of at-grade crossings will improve connectivity and safety Broad sidewalks and bulb-outs offer comfortable, buffered walkways for pedestrians while allowing for on-street parking ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 63 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Signage and Wayﬁ nding Intent: Establish an overall signage and wayﬁ nding program that will visually knit Anaheim Canyon together; support and promote the unique brand; enhance the pedestrian environment; and assist employees, residents, and visitors in ﬁ nding their way in and around the area with convenience and ease. 1. Develop a consistent naming convention by replacing, when possible, existing “The Canyon” banners, monuments, and street signage with updated “Anaheim Canyon” signage. Ensure all new signage includes the name “Anaheim Canyon.” 2. Explore opportunities for educational and interpretive signage to highlight important historic or natural features of the area. In particular, coordinate with the Orange County Water District to develop a signage program that educates people about their operations and the importance of groundwater recharge in Orange County. 3. Place prominent landscaping and trees so they help improve wayﬁ nding through common spaces, identify building and frame vistas to the Santa Ana Mountains and the Santa Ana River. 4. Develop consistent thematically branded wayﬁ nding and signage throughout Anaheim Canyon, maximizing visual recognition for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicyclist circulation; and providing direction to parking areas, major bus stops, and key community amenities such as the Metrolink Station and the Santa Ana River Trail. 5. Place wayﬁ nding and directional signs at a height visible for both pedestrians and drivers. Signs should be placed at approximately 12 to 15 feet above ground. Scale signage to be visible both from the roadway and sidewalks. Directional sign letters and numbers should be scaled so they are no less than four inches tall. Signage and wayﬁ nding placement contributes to the overall character of a place, and assists all users in ﬁ nding their way around Interpretive signage helps to educate the community about the resources around them ---PAGE BREAK--- 64 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Public Art Intent: Promote creativity and strengthen the Anaheim Canyon brand through the design and placement of unique and functional public art. 1. Display public art pieces at gateways, within medians along major roadways, on bulb-outs, along wide sidewalk spaces, and adjacent to major transit facilities so they are highly visible and become iconic features for Anaheim Canyon. 2. Create a cohesive series of art pieces either by theme, artist, style, or materials and explore installation of artistically designed bicycle racks, trash receptacles, seating, lighting posts, and utility boxes. 3. Explore opportunities for local and regional artists to design, fabricate, and install public art that reﬂ ects and promotes the industrial, innovative, and sustainable characteristics of Anaheim Canyon. 4. Encourage art pieces that serve both an aesthetic and functional purpose, such as sculptural bicycle racks, trash receptacles, seating, lighting posts, utility boxes, and renewable energy generating structures wind turbines and solar panels). 5. Encourage public art that reﬂ ects the area’s unique history former hub for the defense and aerospace industry) and/or promotes the image of Anaheim Canyon becoming a center for the Innovation Economy. Incorporate public art in highly visible locations of the public right-of-way to help create iconic features for Anaheim Canyon Art installations should be functional and reﬂ ect the character of Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 65 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Street Furniture and Lighting Intent: Ensure a well-designed, functional, and safe environment in Anaheim Canyon through the installation of new street furniture and the upgrade and expansion of public lighting. 1. Provide pedestrian-friendly streetscape amenities – including seating, trash receptacles, and bus shelters – at key nodes along Miraloma Avenue, Miller Street, Kraemer Boulevard, La Palma Avenue, Orangethorpe Avenue, and Tustin Avenue. 2. Provide bicycle racks and/or lockers at key locations throughout the Planning Area – especially near major employers and the Metrolink Station. Ensure that bicycle racks are placed in highly visible locations and in sufﬁ cient quantities. 3. Ensure that bus shelters do not obstruct pedestrian circulation. Require a minimum of six-foot sidewalk clearance for pedestrians. 4. Work with the Orange County Transportation Authority to design safe, functional, visually iconic, energy efﬁ cient, and user-friendly bus shelters. Consider the use of solar panels to power lighting and monitors, require ADA accessibility, and ensure maximum transparency to enhance safety. 5. Provide both automobile-oriented and pedestrian-oriented street lighting throughout Anaheim Canyon to meet established lighting standards and to provide a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment. 6. Encourage the installation of LED or similar energy efﬁ cient light bulbs in all public light ﬁ xtures to reduce energy costs. 7. Utilize a modern utilitarian and efﬁ cient design aesthetic. A brushed steel bike rack, which is an example of a modern and efﬁ cient design aesthetic (Creative Pipe, Model: The Horseshoe) Metal, industrial and enclosed bicycle lockers (DURA Bike Locker, Model: DLP100-1) ---PAGE BREAK--- 66 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Renewable Energy Facilities Intent. Install new renewable energy facilities within the public realm, owned and operated by Anaheim Public Utilities, that provide clean energy to local businesses and become identifying landmarks that help establish Anaheim Canyon as the regionally-recognized green industrial and commerce district. 1. Identify opportunities to install solar and wind energy-producing structures that would provide clean energy to local businesses and function as physical icons for the sustainable intentions of Anaheim Canyon on publicly-owned property. 2. Ensure that new public renewable energy facilities are installed in areas that do not pose a safety issue for businesses or block their visibility from major roadways. 3. Encourage unique design of wind energy turbines so they are interesting, moving art pieces that support Anaheim Canyon’s brand and provide visual interest to the area. Wind turbines can provide visual interest while supporting the sustainable brand Renewable energy facilities can be both functional and iconic in design ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 67 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s Sustainable Plant Palette Intent. Create distinctive, drought- tolerant, and sustainable landscaping in the public realm of Anaheim Canyon in order to deﬁ ne the area’s brand, reduce water consumption, reduce energy costs, and provide an aesthetically-pleasing environment. 1. Ensure that all new landscaping in the public realm includes non- invasive, drought-tolerant plants in order to reduce maintenance costs, reduce water usage, and promote sustainability. 2. Locate new street trees and planter strips between sidewalks and roadways to provide a safety buffer for pedestrians from trafﬁ c. 3. Select tree species for planter strips and street medians consistent with the scale and design theme for each roadway segment (see typical street cross sections included in Appendix 4. Ensure that tree canopies are high and airy to create a pleasant streetscape without impeding truck movement, roadway visibility, or bicyclist and pedestrian safety. 5. Identify plants appropriate for public realm landscaping in Anaheim Canyon, using Appendix C: Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette beginning on the following page. Many of these plants are native to California, and all plants have very low, low, or medium water needs as deﬁ ned by the University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE) Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape Plantings in California. 6. Consider using plants not included in Appendix C only if they are drought- tolerant, California native species, and/ or are cultivars or sub-species of the plants listed in the table. 7. Encourage private developers and property owners to use the plants listed in Appendix C when making landscaping improvements. Evergreen trees offer year round foliage, hamper prevailing winds, and contribute to a unique brand for Anaheim Canyon Drought-tolerant succulents offer a water- conserving landscape for streetscape design ---PAGE BREAK--- 68 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 3 : p u b l i c r e a l m i m p r o v e m e n t s ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 69 The private realm (Figure 4-1) includes all privately-owned property in Anaheim Canyon, which accounts for 60 percent of the total land within the Speciﬁ c Plan area. A key goal of this Speciﬁ c Plan is to streamline both City regulations and the project review processes to help make development decisions more predictable and, in turn, facilitate economic growth. This chapter summarizes the major incentives and strategies that implement the City’s vision for private development within Anaheim Canyon. The chapter begins with the Transfor- mative Strategies that will be used by the City to implement the vision for the private realm. It then outlines the development incentives available to area business and property owners; describes identity and branding strategies; outlines “Transportation Demand Management” concepts; and concludes with a summary of major design principles for Anaheim Canyon. The information contained in this chapter is designed to be an easily understood and helpful resource for the business and the development community. Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards provides the Anaheim Municipal Code requirements for development in Anaheim Canyon. New private development, investment, and improvements will have a profound impact on the aesthetics and long-term economic success of Anaheim Canyon. In this Chapter… 4.1 Private Realm Transformative Strategies 4.2 Business and Development Incentives 4.3 Transportation Demand Management 4.4 Identity and Branding Strategies 4.5 Development Areas chapter 4: private realm incentives and strategies ---PAGE BREAK--- 70 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana van buren jefferson hunter white star kellogg chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune manassero brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa placentia orange anaheim T proposed placentia metrolink station bike trail plan area legend water bodies private realm metrolink station city boundary railroad N 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 T ﬁgure 4-1: private realm ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 71 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s 4.1 Private Realm Transformative Strategies The following Transformative Strategies are designed to support the community’s vision for the private realm of Anaheim Canyon. Along with the Public Realm Strategies at the beginning of Chapter 3, these strategies help deﬁ ne the area’s long-term direction, and can be viewed as broad policy statements that will help guide City decisions and private sector actions in the private realm of Anaheim Canyon. 1. Protect the integrity of industrial and commercial operations by discouraging residential or other sensitive uses within business areas. 2. Support, maintain, and grow high- value jobs-generating uses. 3. Create an attractive and welcoming environment. 4. Create land use patterns and ﬂ exible, business-friendly regulations that support economic development. 5. Ensure consistent land use patterns that support the area’s industrial character. 6. Provide a range of uses, services, and amenities for workers, visitors, and residents. 7. Maximize the range of building and site sizes, products, and types. 8. Identify key nodes along Complete Streets to encourage the development of commercial amenities. 9. Expand the use of sustainable design, construction, and management practices and incentives to all building types and landscapes. 10. Utilize available sustainable development incentives to promote and attract businesses. 11. Expand opportunities for dining, entertainment, and service-oriented retail in appropriate locations. 12. Encourage transit-oriented commercial, ofﬁ ce, and residential development adjacent to the Metrolink Station to take full advantage of commuter rail opportunities. ---PAGE BREAK--- 72 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s 4.2 Business and Development Incentives This section identiﬁ es the incentive programs the City of Anaheim either currently offers, or will offer, as implementation of this Plan. These incentives are a valuable tool the City can offer to attract and retain industrial, ofﬁ ce, and commercial businesses within Anaheim Canyon and encourage the area’s transformation into a regionally recognized center for the Innovation Economy. The incentives are grouped into three major categories: • Regulatory Streamlining Incentives • Green Building and Industry Incentives • Utility Incentives Regulatory Streamlining Incentives The City of Anaheim understands the importance of reducing regulatory barriers and helping to create more predictable development review and approval processes. In 2012 the City established a Regulatory Relief Task Force that developed a series of citywide recommendations for ways to make it easier to do business in Anaheim. This Plan streamlines regulations for Anaheim Canyon by consolidating and/ or replacing previous speciﬁ c plans and zoning and development standards from previous sections of the municipal code with new updated sections. These updates deﬁ ne development standards in a concise and comprehensive manner. This new chapter, included in Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards, provides an updated list of permitted, conditionally- permitted, and prohibited uses; and eliminates the need for a conditional use permit for many uses. The City also recognizes the need to maintain its attractive business environment and evolve its operations and regulatory enforcement in conjunction with innovation, emerging technology, and market transformation on a regional and industry wide scale. Accordingly, the City will continue to revise the municipal code to establish more ﬂ exible regulatory frameworks to accommodate business operational changes and restructuring. Consolidating the zoning requirements and development standards of the previous Paciﬁ Center and Northeast Area speciﬁ c plans will help streamline the development review and approval process in Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 73 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s Green Building and Industry Incentives The City wants to continue to identify ways to encourage green buildings and industries in Anaheim Canyon as a key strategy for economic growth and a major step towards retaining a large share of the Innovation Economy market. Encouraging green buildings and industries is nothing new for the City of Anaheim. In 2012 and 2014, the Orange County chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council awarded the City its bi-annual Eco City Award for being the greenest municipality in Orange County, ahead of 33 other cities. The City received this award based on incentives and assistance available for green development, public education via LEED Accredited staff, and an overall commitment to develop green City facilities. The City has also reported greenhouse gas emissions to the California Climate Action Registry since 2003, and has been recognized as a Certiﬁ ed Climate Action Leader by the Registry. This long- term environmental commitment can be leveraged as a market differentiator for the City in attracting new green businesses to locate in Anaheim Canyon. Currently, the city receives 20 percent of its electricity from renewable resources including geothermal, wind, solar, hydroelectric, and landﬁ ll gas. In an effort to continue reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the City plans to increase renewable energy resources to 25 percent by 2016 and 33% by 2020. In 2006 the City Council adopted a series of citywide goals grounded in the principles of environmental soundness and sustainable development. Anaheim Public Utilities is using a variety of programs and development models to implement these goals for new private development. In addition to encouraging and incentivizing sustainable techniques, the Green Building Program has resulted in lower operating costs and, in some cases, higher tenant rates due to tenant demand for green buildings. To further incentivize green businesses, the City will develop an “Eco-Industrial Park” (EIP, see description on next page) initiative in Anaheim Canyon. The City offers special incentives for new or remodeled green development, which would include those that meet LEED standards The City offers assistance and information for developers and property owners to implement on-site water quality systems ---PAGE BREAK--- 74 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s Eco-Industrial Parks An Eco-Industrial Park (EIP) is a cluster of industrial manufacturing and support facilities that work together to improve their overall environmental and economic performance through the sharing of resources. Participating companies maintain common environmental stewardship goals and recycle by-products of each facility’s waste streams for use in other facilities’ processes. This collaboration results in an “industrial ecosystem” of energy efﬁ cient and resource efﬁ cient operations that would not have been possible for participating businesses to achieve alone. Energy, waste, and water reuse are integral to the functioning of an EIP. Other shared sustainability initiatives among EIP participants may include stormwater management, food waste composting, vehicle idling reductions, and sustainable purchasing policies. In Anaheim Canyon, there is a strong potential for large industrial producers to form an EIP by joining with the City’s power plant in a waste-to-energy loop. Successful EIPs often begin as a power plant coupled with one or two industrial producers, and then grow over time to encompass many interconnected waste and energy streams. EIPs can be created in existing industrial areas like Anaheim Canyon through retroﬁ ts and new operational strategies. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 75 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s Utility Incentives Energy Efﬁ ciency Incentives The Anaheim Public Utilities Department offers a wide variety of commercial and industrial programs that provide incentives for businesses to locate and operate in Anaheim Canyon. These incentive programs cover a diverse spectrum of energy and water systems and services, ranging from systematic energy audits, lighting retroﬁ ts, water conservation strategies, renewable energy utilization, and new construction and customized energy reduction strategies. Water Efﬁ ciency Incentives As mentioned previously, the City of Anaheim is in a unique position as the City’s water and electricity provider. There are several incentive programs currently offered that are speciﬁ c to water efﬁ ciency and conservation for businesses. New Utility Incentives In addition to the existing City programs, Southern California Gas offers a variety of energy efﬁ ciency measures. Together, these programs offer a wide range of incentives to commercial and industrial utility customers. Small business programs may be particularly useful to start-up and small research and development businesses using ﬂ ex commercial space. Other programs, especially the special Economic Development/Business Retention Incentive Rate, are critical tools for attracting and retaining large customers. In addition to this energy rate incentive, the City has an opportunity to partner with larger businesses or employers for water use incentives to stay, relocate, or operate in Anaheim Canyon. In an age of shortages and service interruptions, this can be an edge in the competition for economic growth. There are also possibilities to further market and expand current programs, or develop new programs, to provide additional water and utility incentives. Incentives must be responsive to new opportunities as industrial technologies change and evolve. For example, the City is currently deploying “smart meters” that will enable Anaheim Public Utilities to digitally communicate the ﬂ uctuating price of electricity to consumers in real time. Businesses that are able to switch major operations to off-peak times may opt for a critical peak pricing electricity rate structure, where they pay more for electricity during peak times and less during off-peak times. ---PAGE BREAK--- 76 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s 4.3 Transportation Demand Management Transportation Demand Management (TDM) refers to a mix of strategies aimed at reducing transportation impacts, fuel consumption, and vehicle emissions. TDM strategies are designed to reduce vehicle trips and parking demand by encouraging the use of alternative travel modes such as transit or bicycling. TDM has great success potential in areas that have an opportunity to inter-connect their entire transportation system ranging from sidewalks to transit, such as in Anaheim Canyon. TDM enhances the performance of the transportation network and reduces greenhouse gas emission through a variety of voluntary Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) programs. The programs are typically implemented by a lead agency, such as the City of Anaheim, but are ultimately the responsibility of private development to fund. TDM strategies include: • Providing end-of-trip facilities for commuters who travel by bicycling or running/walking. These facilities can include showers, bicycle and personal lockers, and changing areas. End-of- trip facilities are particularly of use to commuters who may take the train to work and need to travel the last few miles by walking or biking. • Encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules that reduce commuter trips by allowing employees to work from home or to travel during off-peak hours. These programs can include allowing ﬂ exible work schedules or compressed work schedules. • Promoting multimodal transportation to create awareness and opportunity for commuters to take the train or bicycle to work. Employers can inform employees of mode options during employee orientations or through publications. “Bike-to-work” week is an example of providing opportunities for employees to be more aware of alternative modes of travel. • Providing preferential parking to commuters carpooling or not driving alone. Preferential parking can be implemented at convenient locations such as at businesses or train stations and can be reserved a number of ways such as free, reduced fee, or vanpool sized. Permits and restrictions may be enforced to monitor the program. Promoting multimodal transportation creates awareness of the opportunities for local employees to take transit and bike to work ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 77 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s 4.4 Identity and Branding Strategies In addition to the public realm identity and branding strategies outlined in Chapter 3, there is great opportunity to promote the Anaheim Canyon brand within the private realm through building and property improvements. The area will achieve an important measure of success in brand and identity when the businesses, owners, brokers, and tenants embrace the Anaheim Canyon brand and connect their businesses to the place. Developing this buy-in will take time, and while the initial efforts will be done in the public realm by the City, there should also be long-term investment in the brand by the private sector. The City and the business community are not in favor of adding new requirements or regulations that force private property owners to add branding features to their property. Rather, the City desires to work hand-in-hand with the business community and the Anaheim Canyon Advisory Group to co-build the brand and provide opportunities for businesses to adopt the brand voluntarily. This can be done through enhancements and modiﬁ cations to their signage, materials, promotions, and messaging, as appropriate. Several areas of the Speciﬁ c Plan support the business and brand connection: • Sustainability. By implementing an innovative and dynamic program around sustainability, businesses can build on green messaging. In addition, many businesses have corporate green policies and therefore prefer leasing space in areas that align with and decrease the cost of those goals by promoting and incentivizing green building construction and operations. • A Place to Grow. One of the unique elements of Anaheim is the relative number of small businesses compared to other similar cities. Anaheim Canyon’s branding and identity will promote and express this ability for small businesses to thrive and grow in place. The availability of a variety of building ﬂ oor plates in Anaheim Canyon, as well as a broad range of development opportunities and incentives, supports such evolution for area businesses. • Livability and Open Space. The reﬁ nement of greenways, water features, and overall livability related to transit and walkability will improve the attractiveness of Anaheim Canyon to prospective employees and therefore businesses. ---PAGE BREAK--- 78 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s 4.5 Development Areas In order to identify speciﬁ c areas for certain allowed uses and development standards, the Speciﬁ c Plan establishes six unique Development Areas. Each Development Area is, in essence, an individual zoning district within Anaheim Canyon. The location and extent of each Development Area are shown on Figure 4-2: Development Areas. Following is a brief summary of each Development Area’s purpose and intent. See Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards for more information. DA-1: Industrial Area The Industrial Area provides for the development of light and heavy industrial uses and related support facilities. This is the largest development area in terms of acreage and represents the focus for keeping Anaheim Canyon a viable, successful center of commerce and employment. The underlying Anaheim Municipal Code base zone for this development area is: Industrial Zone. DA-2: Recycling Area The Recycling Area provides a speciﬁ c location for waste recycling and material recovery uses and facilities within Anaheim Canyon. Anaheim Canyon is an ideal location for these types of uses, and retaining them within the area is important to the City. The underlying Anaheim Municipal Code base zone for this development area is: Industrial Zone. DA-3: Transit-Oriented Area The Transit-Oriented Area provides a location for the development of a high quality, pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly mixed-use district. This district will deﬁ ne the core of Anaheim Canyon and take full advantage of the Metrolink Station and convenient access to the Riverside Freeway and open space areas. This area provides a unique location for new workforce and commuter housing within Anaheim Canyon, including affordable housing. The underlying Anaheim Municipal Code base zone for this development area is: “MU” Mixed Use Overlay Zone. DA-4: Local Commercial Area The Local Commercial Area provides locations for the development of locally- serving commercial and retail amenities, such as sit-down restaurants, fast food establishments, professional services, and other commercial uses that serve the local workforce. These areas are dispersed throughout Anaheim Canyon and provide a viable opportunity to create new worker amenities within a walkable or bikeable distance from most area businesses. They are also primarily located on Complete Streets Miraloma Avenue and Miller Drive). The underlying Anaheim Municipal Code base zone for this development area is: “C-NC” Neighborhood Center Commercial Zone. DA-5: General Commercial Area The General Commercial Area provides locations for larger, regionally-serving commercial, entertainment, and medical uses. These larger uses are important to the city and the region. These uses are intended to take full advantage of good freeway access and visibility. The underlying Anaheim Municipal Code base zone for this development area is: “C-G” General Commercial Zone. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 79 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s bike trail T T la palma miraloma tustin orangethorpe lakeview kraemer blvd frontera miller blue gum richﬁeld red gum fee ana van buren jefferson hunter white star kellogg chantilly cardiff landon la cresta hancock ocean coronado eagle dune manassero brasher gretta hawk fountain armando blue star cosby shepard lance simon mccan la mesa hundley ricker leaverton la loma regal park barsten ceena van horne dynamics kraemer pl hunter marjan oshkosh rail grove bike trail osprey la palma miraloma coronado la jolla rio vista lincoln south nohi ranch canyon rd lincoln glassell tustin riverdale crescent santa ana canyon rd imperial hwy kellogg imperial hwy chapman melrose kraemer blvd rose dr richﬁeld orangethorpe mariposa 55 91 57 91 90 Anaheim Lake Santa Ana River Lakes Santa A n a R iv er Santa Ana River placentia orange anaheim chrisden 0 2,000 4,000 FT 1,000 N railroad city boundary water bodies metrolink station T 1/4 and 1/2 mile radius plan area legend DA-3 transit-oriented area DA-2 recycling area DA-1 industrial area DA-6 open space/water area DA-5 general commercial area DA-7 ﬂex area (DA-1 and DA-5 allowed) DA-4 local commercial area ﬁgure 4-2: development areas ---PAGE BREAK--- 80 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s DA-6: Open Space/Water Area The Open Space/Water Area provides locations for open space activities. This area is intended to be maintained in a manner that protects groundwater recharge activities from incompatible development. Anaheim Canyon is located on some of the most permeable soil in Orange County, and groundwater recharge is a critically important activity of regional importance. Protecting these areas is an important focus of the Speciﬁ c Plan. In addition to groundwater recharge activities, the Open Space/Water Area also encourages the creation of bicycle and pedestrian trails that link Anaheim Canyon to surrounding neighborhoods and the Santa Ana Trail system. This area does allow some non-open space and water uses, as deﬁ ned in the Anaheim Municipal Code (Chapter 18.120). The underlying Anaheim Municipal Code base zone for this development area is: “OS” Open Space Zone. DA-7: Flex Area The Flex Area provides locations for a wide range of industrial, ofﬁ ce, and commercial uses. This area allows ﬂ exibility in both the types of uses and development standards that are applied. Every use that is included in either DA-1 or DA-5 can also be located with the Flex Area. In the event that there is conﬂ ict between the development standards of the two Development Areas, the least restrictive standard shall apply within the Flex Area. The underlying Anaheim Municipal Code base zones for this development area are: Industrial Zone and “C-G” General Commercial Zone. Zoning and Development Standards Each Development Area includes speciﬁ c zoning and development standards that represent the minimum standards to which new development must conform. These standards, which are included as Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards, are part of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code (Chapter 18.120). The standards are speciﬁ c to Anaheim Canyon and, as such, may not cover every possible topic. Where a provision contained within this chapter does not discuss a speciﬁ c condition or situation which arises, the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code shall apply for Anaheim Canyon. In the event of a conﬂ ict between these provisions and the other provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.120 shall govern. In addition to these standards, all uses within the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan boundaries shall comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal laws, ordinances, and regulations. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 81 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- 82 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 4 : p r i v a t e r e a l m i n c e n t i v e s a n d s t r a t e g i e s ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 83 chapter 5: implementation The Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan identiﬁ es the location and type of desired development in Anaheim Canyon, consistent with the City of Anaheim’s General Plan. Achieving this vision requires a concerted and cooperative public/private partnership, including capital investment. The City of Anaheim will focus its efforts on reducing regulatory barriers, streamlining development review and approval processes, improving multimodal circulation and streetscapes, and promoting the brand and image of Anaheim Canyon as an innovative eco- industrial district. The private sector must be encouraged to increase the value of private property by incorporating sustainable and green development techniques, improving building facades and signage, and taking full advantage of multimodal opportunities. This strategic partnership should take advantage of public and private development opportunities as they arise to create value incrementally in order to continue long- term capital investment in this important commerce center. This chapter outlines the “how-to” steps necessary to create positive change in Anaheim Canyon in the short and long terms. This framework creates a solid foundation from which the City can support the growth of existing businesses, attract new businesses and investment, allocate limited resources, and foster collaboration through strong public/ private partnerships. While the Speciﬁ c Plan remains visionary in its ambition, the action steps in this chapter put forth a realistic and practical approach to assist economic growth, promote sustainability, and ensure a successful future for Anaheim Canyon. In this Chapter… 5.1 Implementation Action Plan Focused, prioritized, and realistic implementation actions are critical to the long-term economic, ﬁ scal, environmental, and social success of Anaheim Canyon. ---PAGE BREAK--- 84 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n 5.1 Implementation Action Plan The following Implementation Action Plan (Table 5-1) lists the speciﬁ c actions that need to be taken by the City of Anaheim, in coordination with local businesses and partner agencies, to fully implement the vision outlined in this Speciﬁ c Plan. The Implementation Action Plan summarizes each action by topical area and provides a priority timeframe, primary responsibilities and partners, approximate costs, and potential funding sources. It should be noted that phasing and cost estimates are based on current costs, funding sources, and logistics. The Implementation Action Plan will be used by the City throughout the life of the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan, and as such should be periodically reviewed and updated by the City to reﬂ ect conditions as they change over time. Implementation Action Plan Legend Timeframe Short 1-5 years Medium 5-15 years Long over 15 years Ongoing throughout the life of the plan Cost $ < $50,000 $50,000-250,000 $250,000-500,000 $500,000-$1 million > $1 million Implementation Action Plan Abbreviations Caltrans California Department of Transportation OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OCWD Orange County Water District ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 85 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Economic Development Actions E.1: Regulations for Flexible Business Operations. Implement regulations that allow businesses to make operational changes with minimal or no discretionary City approval, recognizing that business operations change with changes in technology and market conditions. Short Planning $ City E.2: Positive Business Climate Marketing. Aggressively market Anaheim Canyon’s strong competitive location and supportive regulatory climate for users in a variety of industries such as innovative and green industries, aerospace suppliers, biosciences, medical devices, and manufacturing. Short Community Development City E.3: University Satellite Campus/Research Facility. Have the Anaheim Center for New Energy Technology (AC-NET), a partnership between California State University Fullerton (CSUF) and the City of Anaheim, explore the possibility of locating a satellite campus and/or research facilities in Anaheim Canyon as a way to develop public/private partnerships with local businesses and promote skilled labor jobs. Medium Community Development, Public Utilities $ City E.4: Business Improvement District(s). Work with the local business community to establish Business Improvement District(s) as a means to support local business efforts to invest in landscaping and streetscape improvements, and to create new gateway signage. Medium Community Development $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- 86 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Land Use and Urban Design Actions L.1: Anaheim Canyon Master Sign Plan. Prepare and adopt a Master Sign Plan that will be used as a method to improve the Anaheim Canyon brand, reduce blight, and create a more uniform design throughout the area. Short Public Works, Planning, Community Development $ City L.2: Gateway Improvements. Design and install new gateway entry monument signage and landscaping features to create a uniﬁ ed theme and clear identity for people entering Anaheim Canyon. Medium Public Works City L.3: Freeway Landscaping Improvement. Work with Caltrans to improve landscaping and aesthetics along the State Route 91 corridor. Medium Public Works City and Caltrans L.4: Solid Waste Collection Management. Continue to provide diligent oversight of solid waste and recycling management within Anaheim Canyon to ensure waste does not accumulate on properties and result in safety or blight issues. Ongoing Public Works, Planning $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 87 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Mobility Actions - Regional Improvements MR.1: Orange Freeway Between Orangethorpe Avenue and Lambert Road Improvements. Add an additional northbound travel lane. Short Public Works City, Caltrans, OCTA, State and Federal funding MR.2: Orange Freeway Between Orangewood Avenue and Lincoln Avenue Improvements. Add an additional northbound travel lane. Short Public Works City, Caltrans, OCTA, State and Federal funding MR.3: Riverside Freeway Between Orange Freeway and Interstate 5. Add an additional westbound travel lane. Short Public Works City, Caltrans, OCTA, State and Federal funding MR.4: Riverside Freeway Between Costa Mesa Freeway and State Route 241. Add an additional travel lane in both directions. Short Public Works City, Caltrans, OCTA, State and Federal funding MR.5: Riverside Freeway Between Tustin Avenue and Costa Mesa Freeway. Add an additional westbound off-ramp lane at westbound Tustin Avenue exit. Short Public Works City, Caltrans, OCTA, State and Federal funding MR.6: Riverside Freeway Bridge Improvements. Widen bridges at Lakeview Avenue, Imperial Highway, and Yorba Linda Boulevard/Weir Canyon Road. Short - Medium Public Works City, Caltrans, OCTA, State and Federal funding MR.7: Riverside Freeway. Multiple expansions and realignments of on- and off-ramps. Short - Medium Public Works City, Caltrans, OCTA, State and Federal funding ---PAGE BREAK--- 88 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Mobility Actions - Grade Separation MG.1: Kraemer Boulevard Grade Separation at BNSF Railroad Track. Construct grade separation on Kraemer Boulevard. As a result, reduce Crowther Avenue to one left turn and one through lane in the east/west direction. Short Public Works City and OCTA MG.2: Tustin Avenue Grade Separation at BNSF Railroad Track. Construct grade separation on Tustin Avenue. Construct connector road in northeast quadrant from Orangethorpe Avenue to Tustin Avenue. Tustin Avenue at the connector road will have a lane conﬁ guration of three through lanes in the northbound direction; one left and three through lanes in the southbound direction; one left turn, one left-right shared lane, and one right turn lane in the westbound direction. The connector road at Orangethorpe Avenue will be conﬁ gured to have one left turn and two right turn lanes in the southbound direction, two left turn and three through lanes in the eastbound direction, and three through lanes in the westbound direction. Short Public Works City and OCTA MG.3: Lakeview Avenue Grade Separation at BNSF Railroad Track. Construct grade separation on Lakeview Avenue. Construct connector road in northeast quadrant from Orangethorpe Avenue to Lakeview Avenue. Lakeview Avenue at the connector road will have a lane conﬁ guration of two through and one right turn lane in the northbound direction; one left and two through lanes in the southbound direction; and one left turn and one left-right shared lane in the westbound direction. The connector road at Orangethorpe Avenue will have a lane conﬁ guration of one left turn, one left-right shared, and one right turn lane in the southbound direction; one left turn and three through lanes in the eastbound direction; and three through lanes in the westbound direction. Short Public Works City and OCTA MG.4: Orangethorpe Grade Separation. Construct grade separation on Orangethorpe Avenue. Short Public Works City and OCTA ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 89 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Mobility Actions - Local Streets ML.1: La Palma Avenue at Grove Street Improvements. Install a trafﬁ c signal at this intersection, and realign the south leg (Grove Street south of La Palma Avenue) to align with the north leg (Grove Street north of La Palma Avenue). Trafﬁ c signal operations at the intersections of La Palma Avenue at Grove Street and at Cosby Way will need to be coordinated. Short Public Works City ML.2: La Palma Avenue at Shepard Street Improvements. Install a trafﬁ c signal at this intersection with protected left turn phasing in the east/west direction and permitted phasing in the north/south direction. Short Public Works City ML.3: Tustin Avenue at Miraloma Avenue Improvements. Restripe the northbound right turn lane to a through lane. Medium Public Works $ City ML.4: Miraloma Avenue and Miller Street Complete Streets Collector Improvements. Redesign Miraloma Avenue and Miller Street to include Complete Streets improvements that provide enhanced mobility for bicycles, transit, and pedestrians. Both streets currently have bike lanes on portions of each roadway. Complete Streets address the safe accommodation of all users, including motorists, public transit users, bicyclists, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Complete Streets concepts include fully constructed sidewalks and crosswalks with landscaping, bulb-outs at intersections, dedicated right- of-way for buses, grade-separations, on-street parking, and bicycle lanes. The designation of Miraloma Avenue and Miller Street will require an amendment to OCTA’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). Short Public Works City and State (funding currently exists from the Fourth Supervisorial District Bikeways Collaborative to develop bike lanes on Miraloma Avenue) ---PAGE BREAK--- 90 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Mobility Actions - Transit MT.1: Bus Service and Stop Improvements. Coordinate with OCTA to provide additional bus routes to serve Anaheim Canyon and to improve area bus stop layouts and materials to ensure that every bus stop has a bench, adequate signage, and shade. Medium Public Works City, OCTA, and Federal funding MT.2: Transit Awareness Package. Provide links on the AConnext website (www.AConnext.com) to rail and bus schedules that serve Anaheim Canyon and to information regarding OCTA’s Guaranteed Ride Home Program. This information could be used by existing and new employers in Anaheim Canyon as an easy reference guide for understanding and promoting transit ridership. Short Public Works $ City MT.3: Regional Transit Improvements. Coordinate with OCTA to implement regional transit improvements throughout Anaheim Canyon, including the proposed bus rapid transit (BRT) route along La Palma Avenue. Medium Public Works City, OCTA, and Federal funding MT.4: Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station Enhancements. Install bus bays at the front of the station, provide additional parking, and enhance loading areas to include platform upgrades according to Metrolink standards. Anticipate OCTA increases to rail service on the Orange County Line with an anticipated 30 daily trips by 2020 at 15-minute headways. Rail service will also be increased on the Inland Empire-Orange County Line and 91 Line to an anticipated 21 daily trips by 2020 at 30-minute headways. Coordinate with OCTA to improve loading and unloading layouts at the Metrolink Station platforms to improve functionality and safety. Medium Public Works, Community Development, Planning City, Metrolink, OCTA, and Federal funding MT.5: Metrolink Shuttle Bus. Coordinate with OCTA to run a shuttle from the Metrolink Station throughout Anaheim Canyon during peak hours. Short Public Works OCTA, Business Improvement District, or Federal grants (U.S. Economic Development Administration or Federal Transportation Administration) ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 91 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Mobility Actions - Active Transportation (Bike/Ped) MA.1: Metrolink Bike Sharing and Storage Program. Encourage a bike sharing program and bike lockers at the Metrolink Station so rail commuters can use a commuter bike instead of a commuter car for local mobility. Short Public Works City MA.2: Sidewalk Connections and Improvements. Create a complete and connected network of sidewalks throughout Anaheim Canyon, with a near- term focus on adding ADA-compliant sidewalks and crosswalks on Miraloma Avenue, Miller Street, Orangethorpe Avenue, La Palma Avenue, Blue Gum Street, Red Gum Street, Kraemer Boulevard, Tustin Avenue, Van Buren Street, and Kellogg Drive. Short, Ongoing Public Works City and ADA Grants (funding currently exists from an ADA Grant to complete sidewalks on La Palma Avenue between Kraemer Boulevard and Tustin Avenue. The remaining improvements are not currently funded) MA.3: Discontinue the Sidewalk Waiver Program. Discontinue the sidewalk wavier program for new development currently included in the Northeast Area Speciﬁ c Plan. Short Public Works Private Development MA.4: TDM Strategy – End-of-Trip Facilities. Encourage end-of-trip facilities for commuters who travel by bicycling or walking. These facilities can include showers, bicycle and personal lockers, and changing areas. Short Public Works, $ City and Private Development MA.5: Alternative Working Options. Encourage telecommuting and alternative work schedules that reduce commuter trips by allowing employees to work from home or to travel during off-peak hours. These programs can include allowing ﬂ exible work schedules, or compressed work schedules. Short Public Works $ City and Private Development MA.6: Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity. Continue to develop and implement bicycle and pedestrian improvements in Anaheim Canyon as identiﬁ ed in the citywide Anaheim Outdoors Connectivity Plan and Fourth Supervisorial District Bikeway Collaborative. Ongoing Public Works City ---PAGE BREAK--- 92 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Mobility Actions - Active Transportation (Bike/Ped) MA.7: Multimodal Marketing. Promote multimodal transportation to create awareness and opportunity for commuters to take the train or bicycle to work. Employers can inform employees of mode options during employee orientations or through publications. “Bike-to-work” week is an example of providing opportunities for employees to be more aware of alternative modes of travel. Short Public Works $ City and Private Development MA.8: Metrolink Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Tunnel and Walkway. Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access between the Metrolink Station, The Crossing apartment complex, and the Kaiser Permanente Hospital to increase mobility and safety through these heavily used parts of the Transit-Oriented Area. Medium Public Works Metrolink and private development MA.9: Tustin Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Undercrossing. Install a pedestrian and bicycle undercrossing beneath Tustin Avenue that connects the Metrolink Station to the Santa Ana River Trail system. Medium Public Works City and Fourth Supervisorial District Bikeways Collaborative MA.10: Class II Bike Lane on Orangethorpe Avenue between West of Miller Street to West of Tustin Avenue. Improve the current Class III facility to a Class II bikeway. Medium Public Works $ City MA.11: Class II Bike Lane on Lakeview Avenue between BNSF Railroad Tracks and La Palma Avenue. Create a Class II bikeway. Medium Public Works $ City MA.12: Class II Bike Lane on Miraloma Avenue between West of the Orange Freeway (State Route 57) and Lakeview Avenue. Extend the bike lane to connect with existing bike lane segments between La Loma Circle and Van Buren Street, and from La Loma Circle to Van Buren Street. Medium Public Works $ City (funding currently exists from the Fourth Supervisorial District Bikeways Collaborative to provide bike lanes on Miraloma Avenue) MA.13: Class II Bike Lane on Tustin Avenue between Proposed Connector Road North of BNSF Railroad Tracks and Miraloma Avenue. Create a Class II bikeway. Medium Public Works $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 93 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Mobility Actions - Active Transportation (Bike/Ped) MA.14: Bikeway on La Palma Avenue. Develop a Class I, II, or III bikeway on La Palma Avenue from west of the Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) to just east of Brasher Street, and then south to the Santa Ana River bike path. Long Public Works $ City MA.15: Bikeway on Richﬁ eld Road. Develop a Class II or III bikeway on Richﬁ eld Road, south of La Palma Avenue, east to the northern edge of Huckleberry Pond. Extend the lane along Lakeview Avenue to connect back with La Palma Avenue. Long Public Works City and private development MA.16: Bikeway on Grove Street. Develop a Class II or III bikeway on Grove Street from Miraloma Avenue to La Palma Avenue. Long Public Works $ City MA.17: Bikeway on Van Buren Street. Develop a Class II or III bikeway on Van Buren Street from Buena Vista Avenue to La Palma Avenue. Long Public Works $ City MA.18: Extension of Bike Lane on Miller Street. Extend the Class II bike lane on Miller Street from Orangethorpe Avenue to La Palma Avenue. Long Public Works $ City MA.19: Melrose/Miraloma/Miller/La Palma/Tustin Bicycle Facility. Develop a Class II or III bikeway north of Orangethorpe Avenue on Melrose Street/Blue Gum Street to Miraloma Avenue, then on Miraloma Avenue to Miller Street, then on Miller Street to La Palma Avenue, then on La Palma Avenue to Tustin Avenue, and Tustin Avenue to past the Riverside Freeway ramps onto the Santa Ana River as a Class I bike path. Long Public Works $ City MA.20: Bike Path on Santa Ana River. Develop a Class I bike path adjacent to the Santa Ana River from west of the Mira Loma Basin to the Santa Ana River. Long Public Works City MA.21: Bikeway on Santa Ana River. Develop a Class II or III bikeway along the western edge of the Santa Ana River Lakes, the northern edge of the Riverside Freeway ramps, and the eastern edge of the railroad tracks to connect with the Metrolink Station. Long Public Works $ City and Metrolink MA.22: Orangethorpe Class II. Develop a Class II bikeway along Orangethorpe Avenue from Lakeview Avenue to Imperial Highway. Long Public Works $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- 94 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources MA. 23: Santa Ana River Bike and Pedestrian Bridge. Construct a new bike and pedestrian bridge across Santa Ana River to better connect the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station to the Santa Ana River Trail. Long Public Works City Mobility Actions - Parking MP.1: Parking Incentives. Encourage preferential parking to commuters carpooling. Preferential parking can be implemented at convenient locations such as at businesses or train stations and can be reserved a number of ways such as free, reduced fee, or vanpool sized. Permits and restrictions may be enforced to monitor the program. Short Public Works, Planning $ City and Private Development Mobility Actions - Kaiser EIR Mitigation Measures MK.1: Kraemer Boulevard from Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) to La Palma Avenue Improvements. Add one through lane in southbound direction on Kraemer Boulevard (for a total of four through lanes in each direction) between the Riverside Freeway and La Palma Avenue. To implement this improvement, it is recommended that Kraemer Boulevard be classiﬁ ed to carry eight lanes in this roadway segment. Long Public Works City, Caltrans, and Private Development MK.2: La Palma Avenue at Kraemer Boulevard Improvements. Widen the north side of La Palma Avenue east of Kraemer Boulevard to provide a right turn lane and restripe the eastbound approach to convert one through lane to a through/right turn lane. Widen the westbound approach (La Palma Avenue) to provide a right-turn-only lane (the westbound approach would consist of two left turn lanes, two through lanes, one shared through/right turn lane and one right-turn-only lane). Long Public Works City and Private Development MK.3: La Palma Avenue at Miller Street Improvements. Widen and stripe the northbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. Restripe the southbound approach to provide one left turn lane, one through/right turn lane, and one right-turn-only lane. Long Public Works City and Private Development ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 95 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources MK.4: La Palma Avenue at Blue Gum Street Improvements. Implement Intelligent Transportation Systems improvements. Long Public Works City and Private Development MK.5: Lincoln Avenue at Tustin Avenue Improvements. Restripe the westbound approach to provide two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one shared through/right turn lane, and convert the east/west signal operations from split phasing to protect left turn phasing. Long Public Works City and Private Development MK.6: Orangethorpe Avenue at Kraemer Boulevard Improvements. Widen the eastbound approach (Orangethorpe Avenue) to provide a second eastbound left turn lane. Long Public Works City and Private Development MK.7: Orangethorpe Avenue at Miller Street Improvements. Widen Orangethorpe Avenue to have three through lanes in each direction. Long Public Works City and Private Development ---PAGE BREAK--- 96 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Infrastructure Actions I.1: Water Conservation Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs to increase water efﬁ ciency, promote sustainability, and retain/attract larger or high value businesses to Anaheim Canyon. Incentive programs will also assist water utility customers decrease their utility costs through the following water use efﬁ ciency measures: a) Provide free water use surveys to customers to help them identify water saving opportunities indoors and outdoors, as well as applicable rebates. b) Provide landscape design parameters and speciﬁ cations per the City’s Landscape Water Use Efﬁ ciency Guidelines for residents, landscape professionals, developers, and contractors to follow when planning and completing landscape projects in the City. Applicable incentive programs consist of turf removal, weather-based irrigation controllers, soil moisture sensors and rotating nozzles. Short, Ongoing Public Utilities $ City I.2: Bioﬁ ltration Treatment Features. Adopt alternative standards for alleyways, streets, parking lots, and landscaped areas enabling proven bioﬁ ltration treatment features to be integrated in public thoroughfares and private development projects as approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. Short Public Works, Planning $ City I.3: Recycled Water Expansion. Expand the recycled water pipeline system to large water users, when feasible, to assist developers/customers with LEED certiﬁ cation and to provide high quality recycled water for industrial uses. Medium Public Utilities City and Private Development I.4: Utilities Relocation. Relocate major electrical, cable, and other communications utilities underground along Miraloma and Miller avenues. Medium Public Works, Public Utilities City and Private Development I.5: OCWD Recycled Water Coordination. Continue to coordinate with OCWD to identify ways to increase recycled water usage in Anaheim Canyon as an incentive for local businesses and as a means to promote sustainability. Ongoing Public Utilities $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 97 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources I.6: Water Retention Basin Turf, Trail and Seating Improvements. In close coordination with OCWD, convert approximately 10.8 acres of irrigated and inaccessible turf into California-friendly planting, based on the Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette, with new pedestrian trails and seating areas surrounding Kraemer Basin, Anaheim Lake, and Warner Basin. These improvements will be constructed outside of the existing fenced area and would not interfere with OCWD operations. Medium Community Services and Public Works City Sustainability Actions S.1: City Green Building and LEED Program Assistance. Continue to provide green building and LEED program assistance to Anaheim Canyon business/property owners looking to develop or retroﬁ t their property to be more sustainable and efﬁ cient. This point person(s) would provide guidance and resources to help all projects make smart equipment and materials choices, maximize construction waste diversion, decrease indoor and outdoor water use, and increase energy efﬁ ciency through passive and active design strategies. For business/property owners interested in pursuing LEED certiﬁ cation, this person(s) would be responsible for providing general information about the LEED program; strategies for how industrial, ofﬁ ce, mixed-use, and commercial developments can earn credits; and case studies of completed LEED projects. City staff would not be responsible for preparing a business/property owner’s application for LEED, rather they would assist with information and data collection. Ongoing Planning, Public Utilities $ City S.2: Eco-Industrial Parks. Identify strategies and opportunities for formation of Eco-Industrial Parks within Anaheim Canyon. Establish at least one area where industrial and ofﬁ ce buildings will share resources within or between buildings using cogeneration and other waste reuse strategies. Short, Ongoing Community Development, Public Utilities, Public Works $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- 98 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources S.3: Large-Scale Waste Recycling Coordination. Coordinate with large-scale manufacturing businesses to establish collective waste recycling and disposal programs to increase efﬁ ciency and reduce the need to store waste materials on-site. Encourage transportation of waste and industrial by-products between facilities for reuse as an input for industrial processes. Ongoing Public Works $ City S.4: Shade Trees and Open Space. Continue to implement carbon sequestration goals through provision of open space and planting trees. Emphasize planting of trees to shade sidewalks and parking lots in order to mitigate the heat island effect and encourage pedestrian activity. Ongoing Public Works, Public Utilities City Identity and Branding Actions B.1: Comprehensive Branding Strategy and Program. Develop a comprehensive Branding Strategy that includes messaging, key audiences, tactics, and roles and responsibilities in alignment with the Speciﬁ c Plan. The strategy should include marketing materials that highlight Anaheim Canyon as a leading center for green industry, and should include a summary of all City incentives as a means for attracting new businesses to locate in Anaheim Canyon. Short Community Development City and Business Community B.2: Strategy Promotion. Ensure that branding and identity, as well as marketing and promotions, are regularly on the agenda for the Anaheim Canyon Business Advisory Group meetings in order to build ownership and buy-in from existing businesses, brokers, and the stakeholders as well as to extend the City’s resources and efforts in branding. Short Community Development $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 99 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Coordination and Administration C.1: Grant Funding Applications. Identify and apply for grant funding to initiate public realm mobility, streetscape, signage, and branding improvements. Short Public Works, Public Utilities, Community Development $ City C.2: Developer Toolkit Awareness. Make available and promote a Developer Toolkit to area businesses, property owners, and real estate professionals as a resource for making area stakeholders aware of new guidelines, standards, and incentives. Short Planning, Community Development $ City C.3: Recharge Basin Interpretive Signage. Coordinate with OCWD to develop an interpretive sign program along pedestrian trails that abut groundwater retention basins. Each sign should highlight a speciﬁ c, unique topic. Topics should include the history of Anaheim Canyon, the history of the Water District, a summary of the District’s operations, and the importance of groundwater recharge activities for Orange County residents and businesses. Short Community Services City and OCWD C.4: Anaheim Canyon Webpage Enhancement and Maintenance. Continue to maintain the Anaheim Canyon website as a one-stop resource site for all information related to the area. The website should be expanded to include a community forum component where residents, property owners, businesses, real estate brokers, and other area stakeholders can post information about available properties, jobs, or events. The website should also serve as the primary area for the City to provide updates about public improvements, construction projects, events, or other activities. Through the use of an online forum, the City can help to build a sense of community within Anaheim Canyon. Short Community Development City ---PAGE BREAK--- 100 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 c h a p t e r 5 : i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Table 5-1: Implementation Action Plan Speciﬁ c Actions Timeframe Primary Responsibility Cost Potential Funding Sources Coordination and Administration C.5: Anaheim Canyon Advisory Group Formalization. Transition the Anaheim Canyon Advisory Group into an autonomous committee so they can become a catalyst for positive change in Anaheim Canyon. This will help the local business and real estate community become more organized and allow them to take ownership of the private realm concepts and guidelines contained within this Speciﬁ c Plan. Short Community Development $ City ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 101 glossary of abbreviations and terms Abbreviations/Acronyms APU Anaheim Public Utilities BMP Best Management Practices BRT Bus Rapid Transit Caltrans California Department of Transportation CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CSUF California State University, Fullerton EIP Eco-Industrial Park EIR Environmental Impact Report FAR Floor Area Ratio GHG Greenhouse Gas ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System OCCOG Orange County Council of Governments OC Flood Orange County Flood Control District OCSD Orange County Sanitation District OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OCWD Orange County Water District ROW Right-of-Way SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SGC Strategic Growth Council SR State Route TDM Transportation Demand Management TOD Transit Oriented Development TSM Transportation Systems Management ---PAGE BREAK--- 102 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 g l o s s a r y o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s a n d t e r m s ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 103 g l o s s a r y o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s a n d t e r m s Terms Best Management Practices (BMP) Any program, technology, process, or engineered system that controls, removes, or reduces pollution. Bicycle Facilities These include Class I, Class I, and Class III Bike Facilities. A Class I Facility, typically called a “bike path” or “shared use path,” provides bicycle travel on a paved right- of-way completely separated from any street. A Class II Facility, often referred to as a “bike lane,” provides a striped and stenciled lane for one-way travel on either side of a street or highway. A Class III Facility, generally referred to as a “bike route,” provides routes through areas not served by Class I or II facilities or to connect discontinuous segments of a bikeway. Class III facilities can be shared with motorists on roadways and are identiﬁ ed only by signing. Business Improvement District (BID) A BID is a public-private partnership in which businesses in a deﬁ ned area pay an additional tax or fee in order to fund improvements or maintenance within the district’s boundaries. Complete Streets Complete Streets are streets that are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities. They can include a unique design identity, areas for pedestrian gathering, and systems to capture and ﬁ lter stormwater. In addition to helping create more attractive, accessible, and safer environments, Complete Streets are also required by the State as a means for providing access to multimodal transportation options (Assembly Bill 1358). Density The number of residential dwelling units per acre of land. Densities speciﬁ ed in the General Plan are expressed in units per gross developable acre. Developer Toolkit The Developer Toolkit is intended to be a succinct reference for area property owners, developers, and real estate professionals to understand the transformative strategies, branding and design concepts, permitted uses, development standards, and major incentives of the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan. It includes information on the local, regional, State, and Federal regulatory process for new development, including strategies for how for developers can create energy efﬁ cient and sustainable development (and its associated cost savings). While the content of the toolkit is largely derived from the Plan, it is a reference document and not a formal part of the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁ c Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- 104 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 g l o s s a r y o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s a n d t e r m s Development Standards The basic building form or “envelope” that applies to a given property. Development standards consist of measurable building elements such as setbacks, stepbacks, building heights, ﬂ oor area, and residential density. The standards are considered prescriptive and quantitative, and are applied to all properties in each zoning district consistently. The development standards are mandatory, and projects may only be approved if the proposed improvements are consistent with the development standards, unless otherwise provided by a variance. Easement A right given by the owner of land to another party for speciﬁ c limited use of that land. An easement may be acquired by a government through dedication when the purchase of an entire interest in the property may be too expensive or unnecessary; usually needed for utilities or shared parking. Eco-Industrial Park An Eco-Industrial Park (EIP) is a cluster of industrial manufacturing and support facilities that work together to improve their overall environmental and economic performance through the sharing of resources. Participating companies maintain common environmental stewardship goals and recycle by- products of each facility’s waste streams for use in other facilities’ processes. This collaboration results in an “industrial ecosystem” of energy efﬁ cient and resource efﬁ cient operations that would not have been possible for participating businesses to achieve alone. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) A document used to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a project, evaluate reasonable alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to minimize the impacts. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that the agency with primary responsibility over the approval of a project (the lead agency) evaluate the project’s potential impacts in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Impacts analyzed include air quality, noise levels, population, trafﬁ c patterns, public services, endangered species, archeological artifacts, and community design. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Regulates the intensity of non-residential development, is the ratio of the total ﬂ oor area of a building to the size of the land or parcel on which it sits. General Plan A comprehensive plan that lays out the future of the city’s development in general terms through a series of policy statements (in text and map form). Each city and county adopts and updates their general plan to guide the growth and land development of their community, for both the current period and the long term. Green Building A Green Building generally refers to one that is environmentally friendly in terms of energy consumption or the waste it produces during its entire life-cycle. Green buildings are scored by rating systems, such as the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system developed by the U.S. Green Building Council, Green Globes from GBI, and other locally-developed rating systems. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 I 105 g l o s s a r y o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s a n d t e r m s Green Streets A Green Street is a street that has been designed to include innovative natural stormwater systems to help reduce runoff and associated pollutants, bring natural elements into streets, and improve access for pedestrians and bicyclists. These features are often used to help improve both water quality and the aesthetics of the public realm. Groundwater Water that is contained in the vast underground aquifer system located beneath the surface. It is different from surface water, which includes water in rivers, streams, and lakes. Impervious Surface Any material which prevents absorption of water into land. Inﬁ ll The development of new housing or other buildings on scattered vacant lots in a predominantly developed area or on new building parcels created by permitted lot splits. Inﬁ ltration Gradual ﬂ ow of runoff through the soil to mix with groundwater. Infrastructure Permanent utility installations, including roads, water supply lines, sewage collection pipes, drainage pipes, and power and communications lines. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) A national program aimed at using modern computers and communications to make travel smarter, faster, safer, and more convenient. Level of Service (LOS) A qualitative term describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or at an intersection during a speciﬁ c time interval. It ranges from LOS A (very little delay) to LOS F (long delays and congestion). Mitigation A speciﬁ c action taken to reduce environmental impacts. Mitigation measures are required as a component of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) if signiﬁ cant measures are identiﬁ ed. Mixed-Use Development A development form in which a mix of uses is located in close proximity to each other, sometimes within the same building. The land uses may be stacked on top of each other a retail land use on the ground ﬂ oor with multi-family residential units or ofﬁ ces above). Alternately, the mix could be “horizontal” in nature where, for example, commercial or institutional (school or civic) uses are placed directly next to multi-family residential uses. In all instances the intent of a mixed-use designation is to allow a higher density and intensity of uses that encourage pedestrian activity by placing residents within walking distance of daily needs, reducing automobile dependence. ---PAGE BREAK--- 106 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I s e c o n d r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I a u g u s t 2 0 1 5 g l o s s a r y o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s a n d t e r m s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) As authorized by the Clean Water Act, the NPDES permit program controls water pollution. Parking – Shared Parking The concept of using the same parking spaces for two or more different land uses at different times. For example, many businesses experience their peak business during daytime business hours on weekdays, while restaurants and bars peak in the evening hours and on weekends. This presents an opportunity for shared parking arrangements and can improve the economics of constructing new parking by providing greater turnover in the facility. Residents in a mixed-use building generally need parking at night, while retail users need parking during the day. Mixed-use developments that share parking result in greater density, better pedestrian connections, and reduced reliance on private vehicles because multiple uses can be accessed by walking. Private Realm The private realm includes all privately owned land and improvements, including buildings, private parking lots, and landscaping. Public Realm The public realm includes all publicly owned land and improvements, including roads, sidewalks, public parking lots, open space, etc. Right-of-Way (ROW) A continuous strip of land reserved for or actually occupied by a road, sidewalk, parkway, crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary sewer, storm drain, trafﬁ c equipment, or other similar use. Setbacks Refers to the space between the property lines and the front, side, and back of buildings. While a consistent of building facades along the sidewalk edge is important, front setbacks allow privacy for the residential uses and encourage space for outdoor dining activities for retail uses. Solar Photovoltaic Systems Solar photovoltaic systems use solar panels to convert sunlight into electricity. A system is typically made up of one or more solar photovoltaic panels, a DC/ AC power converter (also known as an inverter), a racking system that holds the solar panels, electrical interconnections, and mounting for other components. A small solar photovoltaic system may provide energy to a single consumer, or to an isolated device like a lamp or a weather instrument. Large grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems can provide the energy needed by many customers. Speciﬁ c Plan A speciﬁ c plan is a special set of development standards that apply to a particular geographical area. Under California law, a speciﬁ c plan provides for systematic implementation of the general plan for all or part of the area covered by the general plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-1 Roadway Improvements The following street section diagrams show proposed improvements for all major streets in Anaheim Canyon based upon the following Roadway Classification system: • Major Arterial • Primary Arterial • Secondary Arterial • Complete Streets Collector • Collector Street • Industrial Interior (Note: see Section 3.3 of the Specific Plan for a complete description of each classification) Each roadway is illustrated with a photo of the existing condition, a cross section showing the typical existing roadway configuration, and two options for how the City can implement the concepts of the Specific Plan. Option A cross sections show cost- efficient, near-term improvements that can make the roadway more efficient and aesthetically pleasing. These typically include the addition of new roadway striping, bike lanes, and complete sidewalks. Option B cross sections include additional improvements that may take longer to implement due to limited financial resources. These typically include revised lane or curb widths, new medians and pedestrian bulb-outs, undergrounded utilities, improved street lighting, street trees, stormwater planters, and branding features. appendix a: street cross sections ---PAGE BREAK--- A-2 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Major Arterial Orangethorpe Avenue Orangethorpe Avenue, Looking East, Existing Condition Orangethorpe Avenue, Looking East, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-3 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Orangethorpe Avenue, Looking East, Option A Orangethorpe Avenue, Looking East, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- A-4 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Major Arterial Tustin Avenue (Orangethorpe to State Route 91 overpass) Tustin Avenue, Looking South, Existing Condition Tustin Avenue, Looking South, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Tustin Avenue, Looking South, Option A Tustin Avenue, Looking South, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- A-6 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Primary Arterial Kraemer Boulevard North (Orangethorpe to Miraloma) Kraemer Boulevard North, Looking South, Existing Condition Kraemer Boulevard North, Looking South, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-7 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Kraemer Boulevard North, Looking South, Option B Kraemer Boulevard North, Looking South, Option A ---PAGE BREAK--- A-8 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Primary Arterial Kraemer Boulevard South (Miraloma to La Palma) Kraemer Boulevard South, Looking South, Existing Condition Kraemer Boulevard South, Looking South, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-9 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Kraemer Boulevard South, Looking South, Option B Kraemer Boulevard South, Looking South, Option A ---PAGE BREAK--- A-10 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Primary Arterial La Palma Avenue West (State Route 91 to Tustin Avenue) La Palma Avenue West, Looking East, Existing Condition La Palma Avenue West, Looking East, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-11 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s La Palma Avenue West, Looking East, Option A La Palma Avenue West, Looking East, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- A-12 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Primary Arterial La Palma Avenue East (Tustin Avenue to Imperial) La Palma Avenue East, Looking East, Existing Condition La Palma Avenue East, Looking East, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-13 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s La Palma Avenue East, Looking East, Option A La Palma Avenue East, Looking East, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- A-14 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Primary Arterial Lakeview Avenue (Orangethorpe to La Palma) Lakeview Avenue, Looking South, Existing Condition Lakeview Avenue, Looking South, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-15 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Lakeview Avenue, Looking South, Option A Lakeview Avenue, Looking South, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- A-16 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Secondary Arterial Kellogg Drive Blue Gum Street Jefferson Street Richfield Road Kellogg Drive, Looking South, Existing Condition Kellogg Drive, Looking South, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-17 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Kellogg Drive, Looking South, Option A Kellogg Drive, Looking South, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- A-18 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Complete Streets Collector Miraloma Avenue Miraloma Avenue, Looking East, Existing Condition Miraloma Avenue, Looking East, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-19 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Miraloma Avenue, Looking East, Option B Miraloma Avenue, Looking East, Option A ---PAGE BREAK--- A-20 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Complete Streets Collector Miller Street Miller Street, Looking South, Existing Condition Miller Street, Looking South, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-21 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Miller Street, Looking South, Option B Miller Street, Looking South, Option A ---PAGE BREAK--- A-22 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Collector Street La Jolla Street Coronado Street (east of Jefferson) Van Buren Street Red Gum Street Collector Street Prototypical, Existing Condition Collector Street Prototypical, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-23 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Collector Street, Prototypical, Option A Collector Street, Prototypical, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- A-24 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Industrial Interior Interior Industrial Prototypical, Existing Condition Interior Industrial Prototypical, Existing Condition ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I A-25 a p p e n d i x a : s t r e e t c r o s s s e c t i o n s Interior Industrial, Prototypical, Option A Interior Industrial, Prototypical, Option B ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I 2 appendix b: zoning and development standards B- ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 1 Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.120 ANAHEIM CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2015-1 (SP 2015-1) ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Sections: 18.120.010 Purpose. 18.120.020 Development review and permits. 18.120.030 Intent of individual Development Areas. 18.120.040 Uses. 18.120.050 Site and building area. 18. 120.060 Floor area ratio, residential density and structural heights. 18. 120.070 Structural and landscape setbacks. 18. 120.080 Parking and loading. 18. 120.090 Signs. 18. 120.100 Landscaping and screening. 18.120.010 PURPOSE. .010 Purpose. The provisions contained herein shall govern zoning and development within the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Area. Where the provisions contained herein do not discuss a specific condition or situation which arises, the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as it may be amended from time to time, shall apply to the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this chapter and the other provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the provisions set forth in this chapter shall govern. All uses within the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan boundaries shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, ordinances and regulations. .020 Intent. The regulations set forth in this chapter have been established to provide for orderly development of that certain property (hereinafter referred to as the “Specific Plan Area”) described in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Specific Plan”). These regulations provide for the arrangement, development and use of various “development areas” within the Specific Plan Area, to create a regional employment center, which will provide for a wide variety of ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 2 industrial and related uses, a range of services and commercial support facilities, and a limited amount of mixed-use transit oriented development. Application of these regulations is specifically intended to provide for and to ensure the most appropriate use of the Specific Plan Area, to create a harmonious relationship among land uses, and to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. .030 Organization. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.72 (Specific Plans), the standards herein are patterned after the zone districts and definitions of Title 18 (Zoning Code). The Specific Plan is consistent with the intent, purpose and goals of the Anaheim General Plan and Title 18 (Zoning Code). 18.120.020 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND PERMITS. .010 Prior to commencing any work pertaining to the erection, construction, reconstruction, moving, conversion, alteration or addition to any building or structure within the Specific Plan Area, all building plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City in compliance with all provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures). .020 Specific Plan Amendments and Adjustments. .0201 Specific Plan Amendments. Specific Plan amendments, including modification of development area boundaries or creation of new development areas, shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 18.76 (Zoning Amendments) and 18.72 (Specific Plans). .0202 Specific Plan Adjustments. Modification to zoning and development standards in one or more development areas (including provisions pertaining to land uses) shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 18.72 (Specific Plans). .030 Area Boundaries. The Specific Plan is divided into six development areas: Industrial Area (DA-1), Recycling Area (DA-2), Transit Oriented Area (DA-3), Local Commercial Area ( DA-4), General Commercial Area (DA-5), and Open Space/Water Area (DA-6). In addition, the Specific Plan also includes a Flex Area (DA-7), which combines the zoning and development standards of the Industrial Area (DA-1) and General Commercial Area (DA-5). The Specific Plan Area is identified on Figure 1-2, Anaheim Canyon Planning Area, and the development areas, including the Flex Area, are shown on Figure 4-2, Developmental Areas in the Specific Plan document. A legal description of the Specific Plan Area is provided in Ordinance No. approved by City Council on 2015. .040 Nonconforming Building Requirements. .0401 The site development standards contained in this chapter shall apply to new buildings or to any expanded portion of an existing building. However, the expansion area of an existing building may extend up to, but cannot exceed, an existing building’s legal non-conforming setback. Such setback encroachments may be allowed, provided that the length of the expansion does not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the length of the legal non-conforming building wall. .0402 Any expansion that increases a building’s gross floor area beyond 25% (with the exception of interior mezzanine additions) shall result in the need for the entire building site to comply with all landscaping, signage and site screening requirements of this chapter. Exceptions to this retrofit ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 3 provision may be approved by the Planning Director if such site enhancements cannot be achieved due to existing physical constraints. .050 Expansion or Change of Nonconforming Uses. .0501 A nonconforming use lawfully existing upon the date of adoption of the Specific Plan may be expanded or extended throughout a building lawfully existing upon said date. Building additions to allow the expansion of such use shall be permitted. .0502 A nonconforming use lawfully existing upon the date of adoption of the Specific Plan may be may be changed to another nonconforming primary permitted use of the zoning designation in effect prior to the adoption of the Specific Plan. .060 Destroyed Homes. A legally established single-family residence, existing on the date of adoption of the Specific Plan, that is damaged or destroyed by earthquake, fire, wind, flood, explosion or other disaster, casualty or act of God, or of a public enemy, may be reconstructed subject to development standards contained within either the RS-2 or RS-3 Zone, based on lot size; provided, however, that a complete and proper application for a building permit is filed with the Building Division within two years of the date of the event that caused the damage or destruction. 18.120.030 INTENT OF INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS. .010 Industrial Area (DA-1). The intent of the Industrial Area (DA-1) is to provide for and encourage the development of light and heavy industrial uses and related facilities, and further, to recognize the unique and valuable industrial land resources existing within the City of Anaheim and to protect Anaheim Canyon as a viable, successful commerce and employment center. This resource is found to have both local and regional significance due to an ideal industrial environment, including central geographic location, regional access and circulation, availability of utilities and services, and a well-established industrial base. The underlying base zone for this area is the Industrial Zone and, unless otherwise indicated, the standards of the Industrial Zone shall apply. .020 Recycling Area (DA-2). The intent of the Recycling Area (DA-2) is to provide for and encourage a specific location for waste recycling and material recovery uses and facilities within Anaheim Canyon. Due to the presence of an ideal industrial environment, including central geographic location, regional access and circulation, availability of utilities and services, and the presence of a large urban population, the availability of land for recycling, materials recovery and related uses is a resource found to have both local and regional significance. The underlying base zone for this area is the Industrial Zone and, unless otherwise indicated, the standards of the Industrial Zone shall apply. .030 Transit Oriented Area (DA-3). The intent of the Transit Oriented Area (DA-3) is to provide for and encourage the development of a high-quality, pedestrian and bicycle friendly mixed-use district that will define the core of Anaheim Canyon and take full advantage of the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station and convenient access to the Riverside Freeway and open space areas. This area provides a unique location for new workforce and commuter housing within Anaheim Canyon, including affordable housing. These resources are found to have both local and regional significance due to the City's central geographic location and ideal proximity to regional markets and labor pools, and regional access, circulation and public transit routes. This mixed use area, and its continued development in a ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 4 quality manner, is found to be a resource essential to the community's economic health and the preservation of a competitive growth potential. The underlying, base zone for this area is the “MU” Mixed Use Overlay Zone and, unless otherwise indicated, the standards of the “MU” Mixed Use Overlay Zone shall apply. .040 Local Commercial Area (DA-4). The intent of the Local Commercial Area (DA-4) is to provide locations for the development of locally-serving commercial and retail amenities, such as sit- down restaurants, fast food restaurants, professional services and other commercial uses that serve the local workforce. These areas are dispersed throughout Anaheim Canyon and provide a viable opportunity to create new worker amenities within a walkable or bikeable distance from most area businesses. The underlying base zone for this area is "C-NC" Neighborhood Center Commercial Zone and, unless otherwise indicated, the standards of the “C-NC” Neighborhood Center Commercial Zone shall apply. .050 General Commercial Area (DA-5). The intent of the General Commercial Area (DA-5) is to provide locations for larger, regionally-serving commercial, entertainment and medical uses. These larger uses are important to the city and the region. These uses are intended to take full advantage of good freeway access and visibility. The underlying base zone for this area is "C-G" General Commercial Zone and, unless otherwise indicated, the standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone shall apply. .060 Open Space/Water Area (DA-6). The intent of the Open Space/Water Area (DA-6) is to ensure that all existing water-related, open space areas are protected from incompatible uses and maintained in an orderly manner. Anaheim Canyon is located on some of the most permeable soil in Orange County, and groundwater recharge is a critically important activity of regional importance. Protecting these areas is an important focus of the Specific Plan. In addition to groundwater recharge activities, this area also encourages the creation of bicycle and pedestrian trails that link Anaheim Canyon to surrounding neighborhoods and the Santa Ana Trail system. Certain non-open space or water uses are also allowed within this development area, as indicated in Tables 120-A, 120-B and 120-C. The underlying base zone for this area is the “OS” Open Space Zone, and, unless otherwise indicated, the standards of the “OS” Zone shall apply. .070 Flex Area (DA-7). The intent of the Flex Area (DA-7) is to provide locations for a wide range of industrial, office and commercial uses. This area allows flexibility in both the types of uses and development standards that are applied. Every use that is included in either “DA-1” or “DA-5” can also be located within the Flex Area. In the event there is a conflict between the development standards of the two Development Areas, the least restrictive standard shall apply within the Flex Area. The underlying base zones for this area are Industrial Zone and “C-G” General Commercial Zone and, unless otherwise indicated, the standards of the Industrial Zone and “C-G” General Commercial Zone shall apply. 18.120.040 USES. .010 Primary Uses. Table 120-A (Primary Uses by Development Area: Residential Use Classes) and Table 120-B (Primary Uses by Development Area: Non-Residential Use Classes) identify allowable primary uses, listed by classes of uses as defined in Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses). .020 Accessory Uses. Table 120-C (Accessory Use Classes by Development Area) identifies ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 5 allowable accessory uses and structures, listed by classes of uses as defined in Section 18.36.050 of Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses). .030 Temporary Uses. Table 120-D (Temporary Use Classes by Development Area) identifies allowable temporary uses and structures, listed by classes of uses as defined in Section 18.36.060 of Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses). .040 Use Tables. The allowable uses in Tables 120-A, 120-B, 120-C and 120-D for each development area are established by letter designations as follows: .0401 designates classes of uses permitted by right; .0402 designates classes of uses permitted with a conditional use permit; .0403 designates classes of uses that are prohibited; and .0404 designates classes of uses permitted with a telecommunications antenna review permit. .050 Interpreting Classes of Uses. The provisions for interpreting the classes of uses in Tables 120-A, 120-B, 120-C or 120-D are set forth in Section 18.36.020 (Classification of Uses) of Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses). .060 Unlisted Uses. Any class of use that is not listed in Tables 120-A, 120-B, 120-C or 120-D is not permitted. .070 General Requirements for Permitted Uses. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, the following general requirements shall apply for the conduct of any use permitted in any development area: .0701 All uses shall be maintained in such a manner that they are neither obnoxious, offensive or objectionable by reason of emission of odor, dust, smoke, gas, noise, vibration, electromagnetic disturbance, radiation, fumes, excessive lighting (glare) or other similar causes detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. .0702 All uses shall be conducted wholly within a building except the following: Normal service station operations; Those uses whose description in Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses) allow for outdoor activities; and, Those uses specifically allowed by this chapter to have outdoor activities. .080 Special Provisions. Special provisions related to a use are referenced in the "Special Provisions" column of Tables 120-A, 120-B and 120-C. Such provisions may include references to other applicable code sections or limitations to the specified land use. .090 Overlay Zones. Any property that is located within an overlay zone may be subject to ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 6 additional requirements as specified in the overlay zone. .100 Flex Area (DA-7). Every use that is included in either “DA-1” or “DA-5” can also be located within the Flex Area (DA-7). The least restrictive use requirements of the two development areas will apply to the use. Table 120-A PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Dwellings–Multiple Family N N C N N N Dwellings–Single-Family Attached N N C N N N Dwellings–Single-Family Detached N N N N N N Mobile Home Parks N N N N N N Residential Care Facilities N N C N N N May be permitted in compliance with State law Senior Citizen Housing N N C N N N Senior Citizens' Apartment projects subject to Chapter 18.50 Supportive Housing N N C N N N Transitional Housing N N C N N N Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Agricultural Crops P P N P P P Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C C Subject to Section 18.38.025 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 7 Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Alcoholic Beverage Sales- Off-Sale N N P/C P/C P/C N Permitted without a conditional use permit in DA 3, DA 4 and DA 5 if use is in conjunction with Markets–Large Alcoholic Beverage Sales- On-Sale C C P P P C Ambulance Services P P N N C C Animal Boarding P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C Permitted without a conditional use permit when conducted entirely indoors subject to Section 18.38.270 Animal Grooming P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C Permitted without a conditional use permit when conducted entirely indoors subject to Section 18.38.270 Antennas-Broadcasting P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C Permitted without a conditional use permit if designed similar to stealth telecommunications facility as defined in Section 18.38.[PHONE REDACTED] Antennas-Private Transmitting T T T T T T Antennas- Telecommunications T T T T T T Subject to Section 18.38.060 & 18.62.020 Automated Teller Machines (ATM’s) P P P P P P Subject to Section 18.36.040 Automotive-Vehicle Sales, Lease & Rental C C C N C N Subject to Section 18.38.200 Automotive – Sales Agency Office C C C C C N Subject to Section 18.38.065 Automotive-Impound Yards C C N N N N Subject to Section 18.38.200 Automotive-Public Parking P P P P P P ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 8 Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Automotive-Parts Sales P/C P/C N P/C P/C N Permitted without a conditional use permit when conducted entirely indoors Automotive-Repair and Modification C C N C C N Automotive-Service Stations P P N P P N Subject to Section 18.38.070 Automotive-Washing C C C C C C Bars & N N C C C N Bed & Breakfasts Inns N N C C C N Subject to Section 18.38.080 Beekeeping C C N N N C Billboards N N N N N N Boat & RV Sales C C N N C N Subject to Section 18.38.200 Building Material Sales C C N N C N No more than 30% of the outdoor area, excluding parking, shall be devoted to outdoor displays; subject to Sections 18.38.190 and 18.38.200 Business & Financial Services P P P P P N Cemeteries N N N N N N Commercial Retail Centers N N P/C P/C P/C N Subject to Section 18.38.115; otherwise a CUP is required. Community & Religious Assembly N N C C C N Computer Internet & Amusement Facilities N N N N N N Convalescent & Rest Homes N N C N N N ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 9 Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Convenience Stores N N P P P N Subject to Section 18.38.110; otherwise a CUP is required. Dance & Fitness Studios– Large N N P P P N Dance & Fitness Studios– Small N N P P P N Day Care Centers P/C P/C P/C P P N Permitted without a CUP in DA-1, DA-2 and DA-3 if integrated within a multi-tenant office building as an accessory use to serve office tenants. Drive-Through Facilities N N C C C N Educational Institutions- Business P P P P P N Educational Institutions- General N N C C C N Educational Institutions- Tutoring N N P P P N Subject to Section 18.36.040.050 Emergency Shelters (50 or fewer occupants) P P N N N N Subject to Section 18.38.125 Emergency Shelters (more than 50 occupants) C C N N N N Subject to Section 18.38.125 Entertainment Venue N N C C C N Equipment Rental-Large P/C P/C N P/C P/C N Permitted without a conditional use permit if use is conducted wholly indoors including storage and display of equipment Equipment Rental-Small P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C N Permitted without a conditional use permit if use is conducted wholly indoors including storage and display of equipment Golf Courses & Country Clubs N N N N N C ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 10 Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Group Care Facilities N N C N N N Subject to Section 18.36.040.070 Helipads & Heliports P/C P N N C N Requires a CUP in DA-1 if the use is located within 1,000 feet from a residentially-zoned parcel Hospitals C C N N C N Hotels & Motels N N C N C N Industry P P N N N C Industry–Heavy P P N N N C Junkyards C C N N N N Subject to Section 18.38.200 Markets-Large N N P P P N Markets-Small N N P/C P/C P/C N Subject to Section 18.38.155; otherwise a CUP is required Medical & Dental Offices C C P P P N Mortuaries C C N N N N Offices–Development P P P P P N Offices–General P P P P P N Oil Production C C N N N N Subject to Section 18.38.180 Outdoor Storage Yards P/C P/C N N N N Permitted without a conditional use permit if all storage is screened from view; subject to Section 18.38.200 Personal Services-General N N P/C P/C P/C N Laundromats are subject to Section 18.38.150; otherwise a CUP is required. Massage subject to Section 18.16.070 Personal Services-Restricted N N C C C N ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 11 Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Plant Nurseries P/C P/C N P/C P/C P/C Subject to Sections 18.38.190, 18.38.200 and 18.38.205; otherwise a CUP is required. Public Services P P C C C N Recreation-Billiards N N P/C P/C P/C N Subject to Section 18.38.085; otherwise a CUP is required. Recreation-Commercial Indoor N N C P P N Amusement arcades are allowed only in conjunction with a hotel, motel, or a bowling alley Recreation-Commercial Outdoor N N C C C C Recreation-Low-Impact P P P P P P Recreation-Swimming & Tennis N N P/C P/C P/C P/C Permitted without a conditional use permit if use is conducted wholly indoors Recycling Services-General C P N N N C Subject to Chapter 18.48 Recycling Services- Processing P/C P N N N P/C Subject to Chapter 18.48. Small processing facilities under 4,000 s.f. that conduct all work inside are allowed in DA-1 and DA-6 without a CUP Repair Services-General P P P P P N Repair Services-Limited P P P P P N Research & Development P P P P P C Restaurants-Drive-Through N N C C C N Subject to Section 18.38.220 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 12 Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Restaurants-General C C P P P C Fast food and take-out service are permitted without a conditional use permit when a part of an industrial or office complex of 5 or more units; subject to Section 18.38.220 Restaurants-Outdoor Dining C C P P P C Subject to Section 18.38.220 Restaurants-Walk-Up C C P P P C Retail Sales-General C/N C/N P P P N Subject to Section 18.38.220; Permitted by CUP in DA-1 & DA-2 only if the retail is industrially-related Retail Sales-Household Furniture C/N C/N N N C N Permitted by CUP in DA-1 & DA 2 only if the retail sales portion of the business occupies a minimum of 50,000 square feet of building floor area. Retail Sales-Kiosks N N C C C C Retail Sales-Outdoor N N C C C C Subject to Sections 18.38.190 and 18.38.200 Retail Sales-Used Merchandise N N P P P N Room & Board N N C N N N Self Storage C C N N N N Subject to Council Policy No. 7.2 Sex-Oriented Businesses P P N N N N Subject to Chapter 18.54 Smoking Lounge N N P/C P/C P/C N Subject to Section 18.16.080; otherwise CUP is required. Studios–Broadcasting P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C N Permitted without a CUP if there is no live audience. Studios–Recording P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C N Permitted without a CUP if there is no live audience. ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 13 Table 120-B PRIMARY USES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA: NON-RESIDENTIAL USE CLASSES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Towing Services P P N N N N Transit Facilities C C P C C N Truck Repair & Sales P P N N C N Subject to Section 18.38.200 Utilities–Major C C C C C C Utilities–Minor P P P P P P Payphones must be located on the interior of a building or attached to the exterior within 10 feet of the main building’s entrance Veterinary Services P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C Subject to 18.38.270; otherwise a CUP is required. Warehousing & Storage– Enclosed P P N N P C Wholesaling P P N N P C Table 120-C ACCESSORY USE CLASSES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Accessory Living Quarters N N N N N N Agricultural Workers Quarters N N N N N N Accessory Entertainment N N P P P N Subject to Section 18.16.060 in conjunction with a commercial use Amusement Devices N N P P P N Subject to Section 18.16.050 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 14 Table 120-C ACCESSORY USE CLASSES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Animal Keeping N N P N N P Subject to Section 18.38.030 Antennas–Dish P P P P P P Subject to Section 18.38.050 Antennas–Receiving P P P P P P Subject to Section 18.38.050 Automated Teller Machines (ATM’s) P P P P P N Subject to Section 18.36.050.035 Bingo Establishments N N P P P N Subject to Chapter 7.34 Caretaker Units P P P P P P Subject to Section 18.38.090 Day Care–Large Family N N C N N N Day Care–Small Family N N C N N N Fences & Walls P P P P P P Subject to Section 18.40.050; this use may occur on a lot without a primary use Greenhouses–Private N N N N N N Home Occupations N N P N N N Subject to Section 18.38.130 Landscaping & Gardens P P P P P P Subject to Chapter 18.46; this use may occur on a lot without a primary use Mechanical & Utility Equipment–Ground Mounted P P P P P P Subject to Section 18.38.160 Mechanical & Utility Equipment–Roof Mounted P P P P P P Subject to Section 18.38.170 Outdoor Displays C C C C P C Subject to Section 18.38.190 Outdoor Storage P P N N P C Subject to Section 18.38.200 Parking Lots & Garages P P P P P P Petroleum Storage– Incidental P P P P P N Shall comply with the Uniform Fire Code ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 15 Table 120-C ACCESSORY USE CLASSES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Portable Food Carts N N C C C N Subject to Section 18.38.210 Recreation Buildings & Structures N N P N N C Recycling Services– Consumer P P P P P N Subject to Chapter 18.48 Retail Floor, Wall & Window Coverings P P P P P N Subject to Section 18.38.250 Second Units N N N N N N Senior Second Units N N N N N N Signs P P P P P P Subject to Chapter 18.44 Solar Energy Panels P P P P P P Thematic Elements P P P P P P Vending Machines P P P P P P Shall be screened from view from public rights-of- way and shall not encroach onto sidewalks Warehousing & Storage- Outdoors P P N P P N Subject to Section 18.38.200 Table 120-D TEMPORARY USE CLASSES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Carnivals & Circuses N N N N P N Subject to Section 18.38.095 and Chapter 3.32 Christmas Tree & Pumpkin Sales P P P P P N Subject to Section 18.38.240 Contractor's Office & Storage P P P P P N Subject to Section 18.38.105 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 16 Table 120-D TEMPORARY USE CLASSES BY DEVELOPMENT AREA P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Real Estate Tract Office P P P P P N Real Estate Tract Signs P P P P P N Special Events P P P P P P Subject to 18.38.240; Special Events – Outdoor Activity are not permitted in DA-1 and DA-2 18.120.050 SITE AND BUILDING AREA. .010 Site Development Standards – General. Site development standards are intended to provide for the continued orderly development of each development area, to assure adequate levels of light, air and density of development, to maintain and enhance the locally recognized values of community appearance, to promote the functional compatibility of uses and the safe and efficient circulation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, all of which are found to be necessary for the preservation of the community health, safety and general welfare. .020 Building Site Requirements. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use shall be adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner consistent with the stated purpose and intent of the development area within which it is proposed to be developed. .0201 Adequate provision shall be made for the safe and orderly circulation of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic between the proposed site and all streets and highways, and between coordinated facilities, accessways or parking areas on adjacent sites. .0202 The proposed development shall not limit or adversely affect the growth and development potential of adjoining lands or the general area in which it is proposed to be located. .0203 Adequate provisions shall be made for loading and unloading of supplies and materials, and collection of refuse in a manner that is screened from view and does not obstruct required parking and accessways or impact adjacent land uses. .030 Building Size. No commercial building shall be less than four hundred (400) square feet in size, excluding kiosks. ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 17 18.120.060 FLOOR AREA RATIO, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND STRUCTURAL HEIGHT. The maximum floor area ratio, residential density and structural height for each Development Area is shown in Table 120-E. Special provisions are referenced in the "Special Provisions" column. .010 Floor Area Ratio Exception. An increase in the maximum floor area ratio is permitted in connection with a conditional use permit, as set forth in Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permit) and subject to the following additional finding: .0101 The proposed use of the structure(s) shall not create a greater impact to infrastructure than impacts anticipated by the maximum permitted floor area ratio, as analyzed by Environmental Impact Report No. 348 prepared for the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, unless such impacts are duly analyzed and mitigated pursuant to subsequent environmental review. Such impacts shall be determined through a sewer and traffic impact analysis to be submitted to the City Engineer. Additional infrastructure studies may be required as determined by the Planning Director. .020 Structural Height Exceptions. Projections above the height limit are permitted as set forth in Section 18.40.030 in Chapter 18.40 (General Development Standards). Table 120-E MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO AND STRUCTURAL HEIGHT BY DEVELOPMENT AREA DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Special Provisions Floor Area Ratio 0.50 0.50 3.0 0.45 0.50 0.10 An increase in Floor Area Ratio may be permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit per Section 18.120.060.010. Residential Density N/A N/A 60 dwelling units/acre N/A N/A N/A Subject to 18.32.040 Structural Height 60 feet 60 feet 100 feet 60 feet 60 feet 30 feet Minimum ground-floor height for all commercial, office and mixed-use buildings shall be 15 feet 18.120.070 STRUCTURAL AND LANDSCAPE SETBACKS. .010 Structural and Landscape Setbacks. Every building, structure or addition thereto erected in any Development Area shall be provided with setbacks and landscaping in conformance with the provisions of Section 18.40.040 (Structural Setbacks and Yards) of Chapter 18.40 (General Development Standards), and Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening), with the exception of the provisions contained in this section and Section 18.120.100 (Landscaping and Screening). ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 18 Table 120-F MINIMUM STRUCTURAL SETBACKS BY DEVELOPMENT AREA DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Major Arterial 50 feet 50 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet Primary Arterial 50 feet 50 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet Secondary Arterial 50 feet 50 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet Complete Streets Collector 25 feet 25 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 25 feet Collector Street 25 feet 25 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 25 feet Local Street 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Freeway, Freeway Frontage Road, Freeway On/Off Ramps 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Interior Property Line 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Table 120-G MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS BY DEVELOPMENT AREA DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 DA-4 DA-5 DA-6 Major Arterial 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet Primary Arterial 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet Secondary Arterial 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet Complete Streets Collector 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet Collector Street 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet Local Street 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Freeway, Freeway Frontage Road, Freeway On/Off Ramps 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Interior Property Line 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet .020 Permitted Encroachments within Minimum Required Setback Areas. The encroachments set forth in Table 120-H may encroach, as indicated in the table, into the required setback areas described in Tables 120-F and 120-G. Special provisions are referenced in the "Special Provisions" column. Any encroachment that conflicts with the California Building Code, as adopted by the City, shall not be permitted. ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 19 Table 120-H PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS WITHIN MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK AREAS Encroachment Permitted Within Minimum Building Setback Per Table 120-F Permitted Within Minimum Landscaped Setback Per Table 120-G Special Provisions Canopies (fixed) or trellises Yes Yes Shall encroach no more than three feet Cornices, eaves, sills, belt courses, buttresses and fireplaces Yes Yes Shall encroach no more than two feet Driveways providing access from adjacent streets or private accessways Yes Yes Subject to Engineering Standard Detail No. 475 Fences and walls Yes Yes Subject to Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening) Fences, open wrought iron, maximum six feet in height Yes No All other fences and walls are subject to Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening) Flagpoles, including solar flagpoles Yes Yes Limited to three flagpoles for the display of national, state, city and/or company trademark or logo; shall not exceed the maximum structural height per Table 120-E Fountains, ponds, sculptures and landscaped planters Yes Yes Subject to Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening) Gates Yes No Subject to Engineering Standard Detail No. 475 Light fixtures Yes Yes Shall not exceed the maximum structural height per Table 120-E Non-commercial recreation areas Yes No Outdoor dining and seating areas Yes No Parking areas Yes No Subject to Section 18.120.100 (Landscaping and Screening) Solar canopies and wind turbines Yes No Shall not exceed the maximum structural height per Table 120-E Signs Yes Yes Subject to Chapter 18.44 (Signs) Trees, shrubs, flowers, and plants Yes Yes Subject to Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening) Walkways leading from parking areas and public sidewalks Yes Yes Provided the walkway is integrated with the landscape design and does not significantly reduce the landscape area ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 20 18.120.080 PARKING AND LOADING. Minimum Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. All parking and loading areas shall comply with Chapter 18.42 (Parking and Loading). 18.120.090 SIGNS. Sign Regulations. All signs shall comply with Chapter 18.44 (Signs). 18.120.100 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING. .010 Landscaping and screening. All landscaping and screening shall comply with Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening) with the exception of the provisions contained in this section and Section 18.120.070 (Structural and Landscape Setbacks). .020 Required Enclosure and Screening for Industrial Uses. Industrial uses shall be enclosed to provide effective site screening from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way as follows: .0201 Required Screening Adjacent to residential properties. A solid masonry wall, planted with vines so as to prevent graffiti, landscaped earthen berm, or any combination thereof, totaling not less than eight feet in height, shall be required along, and adjacent to, any side or rear property line abutting any residential zone boundary; provided, however, said wall or berm shall not be required adjacent to any lot zoned Transition, which is under a resolution of intent to any non-residential zone, or any alley abutting any such zone boundary. Further, any access gates shall be constructed of view-obscuring material to provide effective sight screening. .0202 Required Enclosure of Outdoor Uses. The perimeter of any portion of a site upon which any outdoor use of an industrial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not less than six feet, either by a solid masonry wall, a chain link fence (interwoven with cedar, redwood or PVC slats) or building walls, which incorporate live plants with adequate growing area, planted along and adjacent to said wall(s) or fence. No outdoor industrial use, or enclosure thereof, shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to any public right-of-way, nor shall any storage of products or materials exceed the height of any such enclosure. .030 Required Screening of Vehicle Storage or Parking Areas. Any vehicular storage or parking area visible from a public right-of-way or a freeway shall be screened from view by landscaping or architectural devices to a height of thirty-six (36) inches. .040 Required Enclosure and Screening for Recycling Uses. Where recycling facilities are adjacent to properties not developed with such facilities, a minimum ten (10) foot high masonry block wall or metal-panel fence, as approved by the Planning Director, shall separate such uses. .050 Irrigation. All new development with landscaped areas over 2,500 square feet shall construct separate irrigation lines for recycled water. All such irrigation systems shall be designed to function properly with recycled water. ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Second Revised Draft Appendix B: Zoning and Development Standards August 2015 21 Disclaimer: This Code of Ordinances and/or any other documents that appear on this site may not reflect the most current legislation adopted by the Municipality. American Legal Publishing Corporation provides these documents for informational purposes only. These documents should not be relied upon as the definitive authority for local legislation. Additionally, the formatting and pagination of the posted documents varies from the formatting and pagination of the official copy. The official printed copy of a Code of Ordinances should be consulted prior to any action being taken. For further information regarding the official version of any of this Code of Ordinances or other documents posted on this site, please contact the Municipality directly or contact American Legal Publishing toll-free at [PHONE REDACTED]. © 2012 American Legal Publishing Corporation [EMAIL REDACTED] 1.[PHONE REDACTED]. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I C-1 appendix c: public realm plant palette Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette Scientific Name Common Name Gateway Primary Arterials & Inter- sections Parkway Median Water Quality Basins Riparian Corridor Bioswale Plant Type Full Sun Part Shade Full Shade Water Needs* CA Native Achillea filipendulina Fernleaf Yarrow x x perennial √ Low Achillea millefolium Fernleaf Yarrow x x perennial √ Low √ Aeonium arboreum Black Rose x x succulent √ Low Aeonium haworthii Pinwheel x x succulent √ Low Aeonium urbicum Saucer Plant x succulent √ Low Aeonium x floribundum Aeonium Hybrid x succulent √ Low Agave americana Century Plant x succulent √ Low Agave attenuata Agave x x succulent √ √ Low Agave vilmoriniana Octopus Agave x succulent √ Low Agonis flexuosa Peppermint Tree tree √ √ Low Aloe nobilis Aloe x x succulent √ Low Aloe vera Medicinal Aloe x succulent √ Low Arctostaphylos densiflora Vine Hill Manzanita x shrub √ Low √ Arctostaphylos edmundsii Little Sur Manzanita x x ground cover √ √ Low √ Aristida purpurea Purple Three Awn x x perennial grass √ √ Low √ Artemisia pycnocephala Beach Sagewort x shrub √ Low √ * Per the University of California Cooperative Extension Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape Plantings in California. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-2 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x c : p u b l i c r e a l m p l a n t p a l e t t e Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette Scientific Name Common Name Gateway Primary Arterials & Inter- sections Parkway Median Water Quality Basins Riparian Corridor Bioswale Plant Type Full Sun Part Shade Full Shade Water Needs* CA Native Baccaharis pilularis 'Pigeon Point' Dwarf Coyote Bush x x x ground cover √ Low √ acerifolius Flame Tree x x tree √ Low populneus Bottle Tree x tree √ Low Callistemon citrinis Lemon Bottle Brush x tree √ Low Calycanthus occidentalis Spice Bush x x x shrub √ √ Medium √ Carex divulsa Berkeley Sedge x x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ Medium Carex pansa California Meadow Sedge x x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ √ √ Medium √ Carex praegracilis Clustered Field Sedge x x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ √ √ Medium √ Carex spissa San Diego Sedge x x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ √ √ Medium √ Chitalpa tashkentensis Chitalpa x x tree √ Low Coreopsis gigantea Giant Coreopsis x shrub √ Very low √ Dasylirion quadrangulatum Mexican Grass Tree x x succulent √ Low Dendromecon rigida Bush Poppy x shrub √ Very low √ Echeveria agavoides Hen and Chicks x x succulent √ √ Low Echeveria elegans Hen and Chicks x succulent √ √ Low * Per the University of California Cooperative Extension Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape Plantings in California. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I C-3 a p p e n d i x c : p u b l i c r e a l m p l a n t p a l e t t e Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette Scientific Name Common Name Gateway Primary Arterials & Inter- sections Parkway Median Water Quality Basins Riparian Corridor Bioswale Plant Type Full Sun Part Shade Full Shade Water Needs* CA Native Echeveria x imbricata Hen and Chicks x succulent √ √ Low Encelia californica California Sunflower x shrub √ √ Very low √ Eriogonum arborescens Santa Cruz Island Buckwheat x x shrub √ Very low √ Eriogonum cinereum Ashy-leaf Buckwheat x shrub √ Very low √ Eriogonum fasciculatum 'Dana Point' Dana Point Buckwheat x x x ground cover √ Very low √ Eriogonum grande rubescens Red Buckwheat x x perennial √ Very low √ Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark x tree √ Low Eucalyptus torquata Red Cap Gum x x tree √ Low Fragaria vesca [californica] California Strawberry x x x ground cover √ √ Medium √ Geijera parviflora Australian Willow x tree √ Low Helianthemum nummularium Sunrose x perennial √ Low Hymenosporum flavum Sweetshade x x tree √ Medium Iva hayesiana Poverty Weed x x shrub √ √ Very low √ Juncus effusus Common Rush- Soft Rush x x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ √ Medium √ Juncus patens 'Elk blue' California Gray Rush x x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ √ √ Medium √ * Per the University of California Cooperative Extension Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape Plantings in California. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-4 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x c : p u b l i c r e a l m p l a n t p a l e t t e Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette Scientific Name Common Name Gateway Primary Arterials & Inter- sections Parkway Median Water Quality Basins Riparian Corridor Bioswale Plant Type Full Sun Part Shade Full Shade Water Needs* CA Native Juncus textilis Indian Rush x x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ √ √ Medium √ Justicia californica Chuparosa x shrub √ Very low Keckiella cordifolia Heart-leaved Keckiella x x shrub √ √ √ Very low √ Laurus nobilis Sweet Bay x tree √ √ Low Lavandula angustifolia English Lavender x x shrub √ Low Lavandula dentata French Lavender x x shrub √ Low Lavandula stoechas Spanish Lavender x x shrub √ Low Leonotis leonurus Lion's Tail x shrub √ Low Leymus triticoides Creeping Wildrye x x grass/ sedge/ rush √ √ Medium √ Lysiloma watsonii var. thornberi Feather Bush x shrub/ tree √ Low Melaleuca linariifolia Flaxleaf Paperbark x tree √ Low Melaleuca Prickly Paperbark x tree √ Low Metrosideros excelsa New Zealand Christmas Tree x x x tree √ Medium Myoporum parvifolium Myoporum x x ground cover √ Low Nassella pulchra Purple Needlegrass x perennial grass √ √ Very low √ Parkinsonia x 'Desert Museum' Palo Verde x x tree √ Low * Per the University of California Cooperative Extension Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape Plantings in California. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I C-5 a p p e n d i x c : p u b l i c r e a l m p l a n t p a l e t t e Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette Scientific Name Common Name Gateway Primary Arterials & Inter- sections Parkway Median Water Quality Basins Riparian Corridor Bioswale Plant Type Full Sun Part Shade Full Shade Water Needs* CA Native Penstemon spectabilis Showy Penstemon x perennial herb √ Low √ Phlomis fruticosa Jerusalem Sage x shrub √ Low Pinus brutia va. Eldarica Afgan Pine x tree √ Low Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine x x tree √ Low Pinus pinea Italian Stone Pine x tree √ Low Platanus racemosa California Sycamore x x x x tree √ Medium √ Prosopis chilensis Chilean Mesquite x tree √ Low Prosopis glandulosa Texas Honey Mesquite x x tree √ Low Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak x x tree √ Very low √ Quercus ilex Holly Oak x tree √ Low Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Berry x shrub √ √ Very low √ Rhus lancea African Sumac x tree √ Low Ribes aureum var. gracillimum Golden Currant x shrub √ √ Low √ Ribes speciosum Fuchsia- flowered Gooseberry x shrub √ √ Low √ Romneya coulteri Coulter's Matilija Poppy x shrub √ Very low √ Rosa californica California Wild Rose x x shrub √ √ √ Low √ Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary x x shrub √ Low * Per the University of California Cooperative Extension Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape Plantings in California. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-6 I a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 a p p e n d i x c : p u b l i c r e a l m p l a n t p a l e t t e Anaheim Canyon Public Realm Plant Palette Scientific Name Common Name Gateway Primary Arterials & Inter- sections Parkway Median Water Quality Basins Riparian Corridor Bioswale Plant Type Full Sun Part Shade Full Shade Water Needs* CA Native Salvia apiana White Sage x shrub √ Very low √ Salvia 'Bee's Bliss' Bee's Bliss Sage x x shrub √ Low √ Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage x x shrub √ Very low √ Salvia Purple Sage x shrub √ Low √ Salvia 'Point Sal Spreader' Spreading Purple Sage x x ground cover √ Low √ Salvia spathacea Hummingbird Sage x x perennial herb √ √ √ Low √ Sedum album Stonecrop x x succulent √ √ Low Sedum dendroideum Stonecrop x x succulent √ √ Low Sedum praealtum Stonecrop x x succulent √ √ Low Sedum rubrotinctum Pork and Beans x x x succulent √ √ Low Sedum sediforme Stonecrop x x succulent √ √ Low Sedum spurium Stonecrop x x x succulent √ √ Low Sisyrinchium bellum Blue-eyed Grass x perennial herb √ √ Low √ Teucrium fruticans Bush Germander x shrub √ Low Teucrium x lucidrys Germander x x perennial √ Low Trichostema lanatum Woolly Bluecurls x shrub √ Very low √ Zelkova serrata Sawleaf Selkova x tree √ Low * Per the University of California Cooperative Extension Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape Plantings in California. ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I 1 appendix d: existing conditions and opportunities analysis D- ---PAGE BREAK--- anaheim canyon specific plan existing conditions and opportunities analysis public review draft I may 2013 ---PAGE BREAK--- contents Introduction and Executive Summary…...….. 1.1 Land Use and Urban 2.1 Economics and Market Conditions.............… 3.1 Infrastructure………………………...……...….5.1 Sustainability……………………..………...…. 6.1 Identity and Branding..……………….……….7.1 Regulatory ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.1 1.1 1 I introduction and executive summary ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.2 introduction • Anaheim Canyon is a 2,500 acre center of industry, business and commerce located in the heart of the City of Anaheim • The area is a major employment center for Orange County, accounting for 1/3 of all the jobs in Anaheim, with great freeway access and a Metrolink station • While industrial uses dominate the area, there are also office, commercial, mixed-use and residential uses currently located in Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.3 introduction • The City of Anaheim is in the process of preparing a new specific plan for Anaheim Canyon, which is scheduled to be completed in early 2013 • The new specific plan will replace the existing Northeast Industrial and PacifiCenter Anaheim specific plans, which were adopted in 1995 and 1999 respectively • The effort is focused on identifying ways to promote economic development – including new, yet-to-be-created industries – in a manner that is flexible, sustainable and defines Anaheim Canyon as the economic and job center of northern Orange County • The specific plan update process includes extensive outreach to business owners, land owners, residents, other government agencies and other local stakeholders • The City has had success developing focused, action-oriented specific plans for other parts of the community, including The Anaheim Resort ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.4 contents of the report • This report provides an overview of Anaheim Canyon’s existing conditions and opportunities, divided into the following topical sections: – Land Use and Urban Design – Economics and Market Analysis – Mobility – Infrastructure – Sustainability – Identity and Branding – Regulatory Setting • This information will be used during the planning process as a foundation for shaping alternatives and strategies for strengthening and enhancing Anaheim Canyon • The following slides provide a summary of the major findings and opportunities for each topical section ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.5 land use and urban design summary • Anaheim Canyon is a major economic and job center for the City of Anaheim and Orange County • While there is a range of land uses throughout the Canyon, most parcels are designated for either industrial or office uses, or reserved for groundwater recharge • Anaheim Canyon has a broad range of block and street patterns, parcel sizes and building footprints • The area has very limited pedestrian and bicycle amenities • The Santa Ana River and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) basins are used for groundwater recharge and are important for sustaining the County's water resources ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.6 • The three largest existing land uses by acreage in Anaheim Canyon are Water (827 acres), Office (673 acres) and Industrial (668 acres) • The existing Northeast Area Specific Plan envisions a total of approximately 30 million square feet of employment uses land use and urban design findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.7 • While Anaheim Canyon is primarily an industrial area, there are many additional community features including: – A new large Kaiser Permanente hospital campus, including associated medical offices – A Metrolink rail station – Transit-oriented residential development adjacent to the Metrolink station – Various retail commercial uses – A scattering of single family residences – A major waste transfer facility – Three large churches, with an additional church under construction – Three private elementary schools land use and urban design findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.8 • There are minimal street furniture or pedestrian amenities in Anaheim Canyon • There are bicycle lanes along Miller, Miraloma and Lakeview Avenues and a bike trail south of the Santa Ana River in the Project Area • Bike lockers are located at the Anaheim Canyon MetroLink Station • There are missing sidewalk sections throughout the area; however, pedestrian improvements are currently underway in targeted areas land use and urban design findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.9 • Engage local business owners, property owners, residents and other stakeholders to identify a unified vision for the future of the area • Protect Anaheim Canyon as a major economic engine for Orange County • Create sub areas within Anaheim Canyon in the updated specific plan to focus revitalization strategies, urban design and streetscape standards, and unique development incentives • Expand the specific plan boundary to include the Santa Ana River and all commercial property surrounding the Imperial Highway/La Palma Avenue intersection land use and urban design opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.10 • Expand multi-modal transportation options and create better connections between Anaheim Canyon and surrounding communities • Identify ways to take advantage of Anaheim Canyon’s large selection of industrial building sizes, which can provide opportunities for many types of businesses to locate in the area • Identify incentives to attract new businesses and help existing businesses grow and thrive in Anaheim Canyon land use and urban design opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.11 • Upgrade transit stops • Improve bike and pedestrian facilities throughout the area • Plan for and help create additional amenities for area workers and residents, including parks and open space, recreation, restaurants, and transportation options • Coordinate and cooperate with OCWD to identify dual or multi-use opportunities (such as recreation and enhanced stormwater capture/treatment) in groundwater recharge basins, with careful consideration for District operational and public safety concerns land use and urban design opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.12 economics and market conditions findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.13 • Anaheim Canyon is a major business and employment center in Orange County • The area contains 18% of the City’s businesses and approximately 22% of the City’s job base economics and market conditions summary ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.14 • Anaheim’s current unemployment rate is 11%, the highest in Orange County • The largest employment sectors in the City include Manufacturing Retail Trade and Accommodation and Food Service (10%) • The vast majority of Anaheim residents (85%) commute to jobs located outside of Anaheim • Anaheim has larger average household sizes but fewer owner- occupied households (49%) than Orange County overall (unincorporated plus cities) • Anaheim’s annual median income is $56,000, which is $16,000 less than the rest of Orange County economics and market conditions findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.15 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim Canyon is a major employment area with approximately 39,000 jobs as of 2010 • Projections from the Southern California Association of Governments estimate that jobs in the Planning Area will increase by over 11,500(13% of market area total) by 2035 • Future housing demand within the Planning Area will be linked primarily to transit oriented development (TOD) adjacent or near the Metrolink station • Future housing demand is expected to include units in Anaheim Canyon between 2010 and 2035 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.16 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim has a relatively weak office market compared to the rest of Orange County overall (lower lease rates combined with high vacancy rates for Class A office space) • Anaheim Canyon is one of the major industrial nodes in Orange County, and increasingly competes with the Inland Empire • There is an improving industrial segment with declining vacancy rates in Anaheim • Lease rates for industrial space in Anaheim Canyon are lower than the Orange County average, but higher than Inland Empire based on the type and quality of space as well as the competitive location ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.17 economics and market conditions findings • In Anaheim and in Orange County overall, Research and Development (R&D) and Flex markets are improving more slowly than the overall industrial market • Anaheim Canyon is not considered a strong location for warehouse/ distribution and advanced logistics uses based on cost, but is considered a strong location for an industrial production, repair and research node within the larger Southern California marketplace ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.18 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim Canyon is an excellent location for attracting industrial and office workforce Los Angeles County, the Inland Empire and other parts of Orange County • The area has convenient access to intermediate inputs (supplies in the industrial supply chain) as well as critical repair and technical services • The area is within easy driving distance to executive housing in desirable residential areas of Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.19 economics and market conditions findings • The City-owned municipal utility provides low-cost power to industrial and office users • The Enterprise Zone designation provides existing and new businesses with a variety of financial and tax incentives to encourage growth and expansion • Anaheim has a supportive regulatory climate and low-cost of doing business when compared to other business park locations ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.20 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim Canyon suffers from a lack of retail and food service amenities, a lack of recreational amenities for local workers, and old or outdated public infrastructure (roads, sidewalks and public spaces) • There are also some older industrial, office and retail buildings that are obsolete for current market needs and in need of rehabilitation • Some encroaching non-business uses in certain areas of Anaheim Canyon may be incompatible with existing or future industrial uses ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.21 • Continue to take advantage of Anaheim Canyon’s strong competitive location for moderately priced industrial space oriented to users in a variety of industries such as aerospace suppliers, biosciences, medical devices and green industries • Create new food service, restaurants and retail spaces that serve daytime customers • Pursue the potential demand for higher-amenity extended-stay hotels that serve local businesses as well as the medical/health cluster • Pursue the increased demand for high-density residential, office and retail development surrounding the Metrolink commuter rail station over the medium- to long-term (5-15 years) • Create quality Flex space to capture this product type as the technology economy improves economics and market conditions opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.22 economics and market conditions opportunities • Take advantage of vacant and underutilized sites throughout Anaheim Canyon • Promote and support strategic commercial sites at major intersections (including underutilized commercial properties at Tustin and La Palma) • Expand opportunities for residential and mixed-use development sites within ¼ to ½ mile of the Metrolink Station ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.23 Future Land Use Demand Summary (2010-2035) * Estimate range varies depending on unit density and floor area ratio (FAR) Sources: CSUF, 2012; BAE, 2012 economics and market conditions opportunities Type Acres Units/Square Feet Residential 11-63* 650 – 1,256 units Office 20-122* 1,330,542 sq. ft. Retail 17-23* 255,042 sq. ft. Industrial 81-114* 1,239,820 sq. ft. ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.24 mobility summary • Anaheim Canyon has good access to regional freeways • The area includes many multi-modal options, including Metrolink, bike trails and transit ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.25 • Anaheim Canyon is primarily an auto-oriented area • Most vehicular congestion occurs near freeway interchanges • While Anaheim Canyon has the right characteristics for pedestrian and bicycle mobility (flat, access to transit, mild climate), the current system has many gaps and barriers • There is a lack of basic amenities at bus stops throughout Anaheim Canyon mobility findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.26 Roadways • Create consistent lane widths on roads throughout Anaheim Canyon to increase safe driving conditions and decrease merging congestion (lane drops along the same arterial can lead to unnecessary delay or congestion at merging points) • Restripe faded lane stripes and markings to improve pedestrian, bicyclist and vehicular safety • Consider creating consistent speed limits along the same arterial to improve roadway traffic flow • Provide additional lane capacity at intersections or improved and coordinated signal timing along corridors experiencing high volumes of traffic mobility opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.27 Transit Work with OCTA to: • Add additional bus routes and stops on major roadways • Provide bus routes that will connect Anaheim Canyon to the planned train station in Placentia • Install pockets or bulb-outs at bus stops to provide safe waiting and loading areas for passengers • Provide safe loading/unloading platforms for all riders • Improve pedestrian connectivity to transit • Encourage shuttles to employment centers • Improve coordination of bus schedules and stops mobility opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.28 Sidewalks • Establish a complete sidewalk network in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards – Minimum of 44” of unobstructed sidewalk width – Maximum of ½” of vertical obstructions – Curb ramps at intersections and driveways – Pedestrian push buttons at intersections • Create a safer walking environment by: – Providing crosswalks at Kraemer Boulevard and Lakeview Avenue Freeway interchanges, in coordination with Caltrans – Installing pedestrian bulb-outs at wide intersection crossings – Upgrading push buttons and countdown signals – Installing pedestrian signals at mid-block crosswalks – Providing accessibility between office and retail land uses – Installing additional pathways consistent with Urban Greening Plan currently under preparation mobility opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.29 Bike Facilities • Create bike lanes to major north-south and east-west corridors • Implement the Anaheim Outdoors Connectivity Plan which will identify additional bicycle facilities • Create a pedestrian/bicycle corridor along Miraloma Avenue • Create additional bikeways that connect to bus stops • Connect existing and new bike paths to the regional Santa Ana River Trail via improved road bridges and/or a new pedestrian/bike bridge mobility opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.30 infrastructure summary and findings • The City of Anaheim is the area’s water and power provider and maintains an adequate and reliable infrastructure system for Anaheim Canyon • The Orange County Water District’s Recycled Water system provides important benefits to Anaheim Canyon businesses • The existing storm drain and sewer systems have the capacity to accommodate additional development in locations within Anaheim Canyon • The extensive existing power, natural gas, broadband and telecommunications networks serve and attract commercial uses in the Project Area ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.31 infrastructure opportunities Storm Water • Further promote the existing “capture, clean and use” strategy for storm water management • Retrofit the existing storm drain system with regionally beneficial environmental improvements including: – Catch basin screening systems – Biofiltration swales and treatment wetlands in Right-of-Way open space areas or building setbacks – Channel, culvert or infiltration basin impoundments for capture of dry weather flow and/or stormwater for infiltration or passive irrigation of natural open spaces or landscape areas and/or for habitat creation • Create more pervious surfaces throughout the Project Area to help filter stormwater and recharge groundwater • Consider creating a “mitigation bank” for regional water quality facilities to relieve new businesses of fees or impacts ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.32 infrastructure opportunities Recycled Water • Work with the Orange County Water District to identify ways for expanding recycled water supply and delivery in Anaheim Canyon • Identify ways to attract businesses to Anaheim Canyon that will benefit from the high quality recycled water • Facilitate recycled water distribution to assist interested businesses to obtain LEED certification • Reduce water and sewer system demands by encouraging low flow fixtures and reuse grey water rather than discharging it into public sewers ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.33 infrastructure opportunities Domestic Water and Sanitary Sewer • Reduce sewer system demands by encouraging the installation of low- flow fixtures and modifications in industrial processes which reduce water use • Encourage installation of Grey Water Systems which direct certain used water from a building to landscape areas rather than discharging to public sewers ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.34 infrastructure opportunities Other Utilities • Continue to place all overhead power and telecommunications lines underground to improve system reliability and aesthetics • Consider power rate discounts for “clean tech” businesses plus encourage on-site solar energy panels for commercial roof tops and parking structures • Consider co-developing a Project Area WiFi network enabling continuous connectivity for workers, visitors and commercial enterprises ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.35 sustainability summary • Local and regional sustainability is an important topic related both to quality of life and economic development • There are many state, regional and local laws, policies and programs that require sustainability at the local level (see Section 8) • The City joined the California Climate Action Registry in 2003 and reports emission totals each year ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.36 sustainability findings • The City has an obligation, through a series of state and regional regulations, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve sustainability citywide, and capture/reuse stormwater at new and redeveloped sites (see Section 8) • The City has an extensive array of green building and sustainability- related programs and incentives • The City has very high standards for energy efficiency, including LEED certification, in City-owned buildings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.37 • Continue to encourage LEED certification on all new non-residential buildings – CALGreen Tiers and/or GreenPoint Rated could be considered for certain building types • Identify additional ways to reduce citywide greenhouse gas emissions through land use decisions: – Zoning options: e.g. form based zoning, increased density, outdoor lighting requirements – Consider using non-electrified traffic control roundabouts) – Protect and rehabilitate open space / habitat areas • Promote multi-modal transportation options throughout Anaheim Canyon • Expand bike and pedestrian facilities and amenities • District scale solutions: e.g. energy generation, stormwater management, waste heat reuse, bulk purchasing for business owners, vehicle idling prohibition, food waste composting sustainability opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.38 identity and branding summary • A lack of a unified identity was one of the top issues identified from background surveys conducted by the City • An identity: – Influences perceptions and decisions – Creates higher marketability – Provides a sense of ownership and loyalty – Attracts both employers and employees – Offers a common link for otherwise disconnected uses or ideas ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.39 • Anaheim Canyon currently has no unique sense of place – where is the “there”? • There is a lack of a consistent brand use and signage • It is unclear whether the name “Anaheim Canyon” resonates with the community • There is no distinctive element that defines the Anaheim Canyon area • The existing large roadways and the lack of amenities reduce pedestrian and bicycle connections to the area from surrounding neighborhoods identity and branding findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.40 • Create gateways that are focal points for arrival and provide better sense of place • Expand freeway “image” for better exposure • Leverage new and refurbished businesses in key locations that reinforce the brand • Create a consistent signage policy to unify the area • Build an identity and brand that resonates with employers and visitors • Develop clear brand guidelines for businesses and partners to ensure consistency identity and branding opportunities Key Gateway to the Canyon Leverage strong business to build brand value ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.41 regulatory setting summary • There are many existing federal, state and local regulations that will affect the development of the updated Anaheim Canyon specific plan • The updated specific plan will generally cover the same geography as two existing specific plans, with the addition of certain adjacent areas. • The updated specific plan will need to be consistent with the City’s existing and adopted General Plan • Major recent changes to state law now focus on greenhouse gas reduction and sustainability, most notably AB 32 and SB 375, and require their consideration in local planning regulations • New development and significant redevelopment are required to reuse stormwater that falls on these sites (infiltration is considered reuse, and the Canyon area is the best location in Orange County for this to occur) ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.42 • The regional Compass Blueprint project developed by SCAG is a voluntary guidance document • The South Coast AQMD has regulatory authority over air pollution created by vehicles and industries in the Anaheim Canyon area • The Regional Transportation Plan developed by SCAG focuses regional investment/reinvestment on major roadways, in particular Freeways, which will have an direct impact on Anaheim Canyon regulatory setting findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.43 • Development projects that are consistent with the Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) are eligible for CEQA streamlining • The State requires Complete Street policies, which are already included in the City’s existing General Plan prior to adoption of the law • The Anaheim Canyon specific plan update process will identify specific ways for creating more complete streets within Anaheim Canyon • The State’s recent CalGreen code applies to the planning, design, operation, construction, use and occupancy of newly constructed residential (homes, motels, hotels and apartments under three stories) and non-residential buildings and structures, and creates minimum standards for energy efficiency construction, materials and systems regulatory setting findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.44 • The City and the community have the opportunity to create an updated specific plan for Anaheim Canyon that streamlines regulations and encourages economic development and revitalization • The updated specific plan can clearly articulate how the City of Anaheim is addressing recent state greenhouse gas and sustainability mandates, and in turn help streamline approvals of future projects that are consistent with the plan regulatory setting opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.1 2.1 2 I land use and urban design ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.2 land use and urban design • This section is divided into the following topics: – Regional Context – Citywide Context – Historical Context – Project Area Context – Zoning – General Plan Land Use Designations – Existing Land Uses – Community Amenities – Views – Streetscape Design – Street and Block Patterns – Architecture – Blank Walls – Parking – Water Uses and Open Space – Findings and Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.3 2.3 regional context • Economics and Market Conditions – As economic conditions improve, there might be potential for new residential, commercial and flex-space developments although current market is very limited – There is more land for development than market demand in Vallejo and American Canyon, the potential for the Planning Area will be influenced by activity elsewhere – Economic recovery, changes in perceptions of the corridor and supporting public improvements will be key to realizing market potential anaheim canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.4 2.4 regional context • Since its founding in 1857, the City of Anaheim has grown from its original 1.8 square-mile townsite west of the Santa Ana River to its current boundary of approximately 50 square miles • Neighboring cities include Fullerton, Placentia, Yorba Linda, Orange, Garden Grove, Cypress and Buena Park • Anaheim is the 10th largest city in California with an estimated 2011 population 341,034 (California Department of Finance) • Key freeways and highways run through the City ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.5 2.5 citywide context • Anaheim Canyon is centrally located within the City limits of Anaheim • The area is configured in an east-west orientation that stretches from the northern to southern borders of the city • Natural features include the Santa Ana River and several water basins, including Anaheim and Santa Ana Lakes, that are used for groundwater recharge and limited recreation purposes • MetroLink commuter trains and BNSF freight trains run along tracks in the northern and middle portions of Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.6 2.6 historical context 1949 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.7 2.7 historical context 1949 • Anaheim Canyon is a part of the historic 36,000 acre Mexican land grant, Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, given in 1837 by Governor Juan Alvarado to Juan Pacífico Ontiveros • The grant encompassed the present day cities of Anaheim, Fullerton and Placentia • The City of Anaheim was founded in 1857 by grape farmers and wine makers from Franconia in Bavaria • For much of the first half of the 20th century, Anaheim was a rural farming community ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.8 2.8 historical context 1964 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.9 2.9 historical context 1964 • Introduction of the interstate highway system fragmented the City during the mid 20th century • The ability to move freight by vehicle, the Canyon’s close proximity to many highway corridors and the amount of undeveloped land made the Anaheim Canyon an ideal location for larger industrial, manufacturing and distribution operations • The aerospace industry has played a huge role in the development of Anaheim Canyon, in particular the creation of Autonetics (now know as Boeing) which located to the area in 1955 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.10 2.10 historical context 1974 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.11 2.11 historical context 1974 • The Canyon continued to expand with larger industrial parcels • This increased the area’s impervious surfaces and created the need to move water quickly off asphalt and roads, which contributed to the need for the channelization of the Santa Ana River and the creation of multiple retention basins throughout the Planning Area ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.12 2.12 historical context 2010 • Currently the Planning Area is nearly fully built out, and is largely divided into mega-blocks that are oriented towards efficient automobile and truck access and mobility ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.13 2.13 project area context ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.14 2.14 project area context • The Anaheim Canyon Planning Area covers approximately 2,500 acres • The Planning Area is approximately 5 miles long and 1.5 miles wide • Existing land use designations are primarily industrial and commercial, with some mixed-use near the MetroLink station • The two existing specific plans (Northeast Industrial and PacifiCenter) include additional zoning for commercial, mixed-use and office • The existing land use mix (what is on the ground) is composed of industrial with some commercial, residential, office, religious, and educational uses ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.15 2.15 project area context • The Planning Area is generally defined by the Santa Ana River and State Route (SR) 91 along the southern edge, and portions of Orangethorpe Avenue and the City of Anaheim border on the northern edge • The western edge is primarily defined by SR 57, and the eastern edge by Imperial Highway ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.16 2.16 zoning ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.17 2.17 general plan land use designations ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.18 2.18 existing land uses ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.19 2.19 existing land uses 0.5% 14.02 Vacant 1.5% 39.85 Single Family Residential 1.8% 46.71 Religious Use/Education 1.0% 25.22 Public Services 25.6% 672.60 Office 0.3% 7.47 Multi-Family Residential 1.3% 33.27 Infrastructure 25.5% 667.78 Industrial 0.2% 8.25 Hotel 1.0% 25.52 Hospital/Medical 4.7% 123.96 Commercial 1.9% 51.07 Auto Dealership 1.6% 44.41 Auto Repair/Service/Salvage 0.3% 6.65 Agriculture 100.0% 2,629.20 Total Area 1.3% 35.00 Waste Management 31.5% 827.42 Water Percent Acreage Land Use ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.20 2.20 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.21 2.21 community amenities ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.22 2.22 community amenities • While Anaheim Canyon is primarily an industrial area, there are many additional community amenities that currently exist. These include: – A MetroLink rail station and an adjacent transit-oriented residential development – Various retail commercial uses, including Fry’s Electronics, fast food restaurants, small community theaters, and private recreational facilities – A new large Kaiser Permanente hospital and medical offices – A bike and pedestrian trail on the south bank of the Santa Ana River – Several large religious uses that occupy former industrial/office buildings ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.23 2.23 community amenities • Kaiser Permanente is a major regional destination centrally located within the Canyon • Three private elementary schools and three large churches, with an additional large church under construction, are located within the Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.24 2.24 views ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.25 2.25 views • The area is primarily flat, and as such, has the opportunity for increased pedestrian and bicycle networks • The design of the street and future developments should consider views of open spaces and the surrounding mountains • Near the Santa Ana River there are views of marshy areas, lakes/retention ponds and distant mountains ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.26 2.26 streetscape design • There is minimal street furniture or pedestrian amenities • Transit stops would benefit by having enhanced furniture and accessibility ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.27 2.27 streetscape design • Signage is mostly focused on vehicular traffic and has a large scale • “The Canyon” signs are scaled for vehicular traffic and have an interesting quality and design that serve as gateway elements which help define the area’s sense of place ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.28 2.28 streetscape design • Currently there are bicycle lanes only along Miller, Miraloma and Lakeview Avenues and a bike trail south of the Santa Ana River in the Project Area • Bike lockers are located at the Anaheim Canyon MetroLink Station • Bikers typically ride along the curb to avoid fast moving traffic making it unsafe to share the road with vehicles • Bicycle connections throughout the area are minimal and could be improved ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.29 2.29 streetscape design • Landscaping and street trees on private property are varied and water dependent • Landscaping and street trees are minimal or nonexistent in the public right-of-way • Recent improvements have occurred along La Palma adjacent to new development based on standards in the existing specific plans (Northeast Area and PacifiCenter) ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.30 2.30 street and block patterns ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.31 2.31 street and block patterns • The Project Area contains a mix of block sizes and patterns, ranging from large 1,700’ by 2,500’ blocks in the major industrial areas to smaller 800’ by 1,200’ blocks near the Metrolink station • Generally, the Project Area has good “bones” for connectivity; however, other factors including safety and lack of pedestrian and bicycle facilities discourage multi-modal circulation ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.32 2.32 architecture • Architectural character throughout the Planning Area covers a range of styles from industrial to smaller residential neighborhood character • The range and mix of styles reflect an area in transition and fails to create a clear identity for the corridor ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.33 2.33 architecture • Landmark buildings within the Planning Area are larger in scale and have a business/industrial park style that is characterized by big box architecture, glass, and large-scale auto-oriented signage at the corner of buildings ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.34 2.34 blank walls • Many building and street edges in the Planning Area lack articulation or landscaping • Many of the edges facing major arterials are setback to allow for parking, but are not treated with architectural features such as windows, doors and other changes in the façade ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.35 2.35 parking • The Planning Area has a wide range of parking arrangements • Many business parks have large surface parking lots fronting arterial streets • On-street parking is available along local streets and heavily used ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.36 2.36 water uses and open space ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.37 2.37 water uses and open space • There are currently no parks in the Project Area • There are opportunities to expand access to open space areas, including the Santa Ana River, retention basins, bike and pedestrian trails, and fishing/lakeshore recreation areas • However, there are significant limitations to expanding recreation because the river and retention basins are used by the Water District for groundwater basin recharge – The District frequently drains basins so they can be de-silted, which includes grading with heavy equipment that scrapes away the surface of the basins – The District operates heavy equipment (trucks, bulldozers) throughout the area which poses and operational and safety issue – Introduction of vegetation within the basins impedes or prevents the required maintenance and can introduce organic material to the basin which prevents infiltration ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.38 2.38 land use and urban design findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.39 land use and urban design summary • Anaheim Canyon is a major economic and job center for the City of Anaheim and Orange County • While there is a range of land uses throughout the Canyon, most parcels are designated for either industrial or office uses, or reserved for groundwater recharge • Anaheim Canyon has a broad range of block and street patterns, parcel sizes and building footprints • The area has very limited pedestrian and bicycle amenities • The Santa Ana River and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) basins are used for groundwater recharge and are important for sustaining the County's water resources ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.40 land use and urban design findings • The three largest existing land uses by acreage in Anaheim Canyon are Water (827 acres), Office (673 acres) and Industrial (668 acres) • The existing Northeast Area Specific Plan envisions a total of approximately 30 million square feet of employment uses ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.41 • While Anaheim Canyon is primarily an industrial area, there are many additional community features including: – A new large Kaiser Permanente hospital campus, including associated medical offices – A Metrolink rail station – Transit-oriented residential development adjacent to the Metrolink station – Various retail commercial uses – A scattering of single family residences – A major waste and recycling transfer facility – Three large churches, with an additional church under construction – Three private elementary schools land use and urban design findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.42 • There are minimal street furniture or pedestrian amenities in Anaheim Canyon • There are bicycle lanes along Miller, Miraloma and Lakeview Avenues and a bike trail south of the Santa Ana River in the Project Area • Bike lockers are located at the Anaheim Canyon MetroLink Station • There are missing sidewalk sections throughout the area; however, pedestrian improvements are currently underway in targeted areas land use and urban design findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.43 • Engage local business owners, property owners, residents and other stakeholders to identify a unified vision for the future of the area • Protect Anaheim Canyon as a major economic engine for Orange County • Create sub areas within Anaheim Canyon in the updated specific plan to focus revitalization strategies, urban design and streetscape standards, and unique development incentives • Expand the specific plan boundary to include the Santa Ana River and all commercial property surrounding the Imperial Highway/La Palma Avenue intersection land use and urban design opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.44 • Expand multi-modal transportation options and create better connections between Anaheim Canyon and surrounding communities • Identify ways to take advantage of Anaheim Canyon’s large selection of industrial building sizes, which can provide opportunities for many types of businesses to locate in the area • Identify incentives to attract new businesses and help existing businesses grow and thrive in Anaheim Canyon land use and urban design opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.45 • Upgrade transit stops • Improve bike and pedestrian facilities throughout the area • Plan for and help create additional amenities for area workers and residents, including parks and open space, recreation, restaurants, and transportation options • Coordinate and cooperate with OCWD to identify dual or multi-use opportunities (such as recreation and enhanced stormwater capture/treatment) in groundwater recharge basins, with careful consideration for District operational and public safety concerns land use and urban design opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.1 3 I economics and market conditions ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.2 economics and market conditions • This section is divided into the following topics: – Approach and Methodology – Demographic Analysis – Economic Profile – Real Estate Market Analysis – Future Market Demands – Potential Development Product Types – Findings and Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.3 approach and methodology • Demographic analysis uses Census 2010 and Census 2005 – 2009 American Community Survey (ACS) data – Census 2010 data is from the “short form” questionnaire – limited to basic population count, age, sex, race, and housing tenure only – ACS replaces the Census “long form” questionnaire for detailed household demographic, economic, social, housing, and financial characteristics – ACS is calculated over a period of time, rather than a single point in time like the Census, direct comparisons cannot be made between these two sources. – ACS data for small areas measures 5-year intervals, with annual updates. Since it has just come out, it will be awhile before comparisons for an area can be made across time periods. • Projections from the California State University Fullerton Center for Demographic Research (CSUF) were used to estimate population, housing unit and employment growth between 2010 and 2035 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.4 approach and methodology • Real estate market analysis assesses current prices and trends for office, retail, and industrial development in the local and regional market – Real estate listings, interviews with brokers, and broker reports were used to evaluate the market for each development type – Comparisons between geographies provide an indication of the relative competitiveness of Anaheim Canyon within the regional real estate market ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.5 approach and methodology • Data for Anaheim Canyon (where available) and the City of Anaheim was compared to North Orange County, which serves as the market area for Anaheim Canyon and consists of the cities of Anaheim, Brea, Fullerton, Placentia and Yorba Linda • These three areas were compared to Orange County as a whole to provide a regional benchmark • In addition, CSUF projections for Census Tracts 117.14 and 218.13, which most closely match the Anaheim Canyon planning area boundaries, were used to gauge potential employment growth in Anaheim Canyon – Demographic and economic characteristics were not assessed for Anaheim Canyon census tracts because there are very few residents in the area ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.6 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.7 demographic analysis: population trends (Census 2000-2010) • Anaheim is the most populous city within the market area, containing 54% of the population of North Orange County in 2010 • Anaheim, North Orange County and Orange County all experienced moderate population growth between 2000 and 2010 – The population of Anaheim increased by less than the rate of growth in North Orange County or Orange County overall ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.8 demographic analysis: household composition (Census 2000-2010) • Households in Anaheim differ from those in North Orange County and in Orange County overall – Household are larger at an average size of 3.38 persons (3.16 in North Orange County, 2.99 in Orange County) – Fewer owner-occupied households at 49% (56% in North Orange County, 59% in Orange County) ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.9 demographic analysis: educational attainment (ACS 2005-2009) • Anaheim has lower levels of educational attainment than North Orange County and Orange County overall – 73% of Anaheim residents have a high school diploma, versus 80% in North Orange County and 83% in Orange County overall – 30% of Anaheim residents have an associates, bachelors, graduate, or professional degree, compared to 38% in North Orange County and 44% in Orange County overall • This can affect the residents’ access to employment as well as employers’ access to a trained labor force ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.10 3.10 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.11 demographic analysis: household income (ACS 2005-2009) • Household income in Anaheim is typically lower than household income in North Orange County and Orange County in general – At approximately $56,000 per year, median income is about $10,000 less than in North Orange County and $16,000 less than in Orange County – While 23% of Anaheim households earn $100,000 or more per year, 30% of North Orange County households and 35% of Orange County households earn $100,000 or more ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.12 demographic analysis: employment status • September 2011 data from the California Employment Development Department indicates that unemployment is higher in the City of Anaheim than in surrounding areas – The Anaheim unemployment rate was 11% – The North Orange County unemployment rate was 10% – The Orange County unemployment rate was 9% Note: the above data are not seasonally adjusted Kaiser Permanente and Fisker Automotive are both major employers in Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.13 demographic analysis: commute patterns • Most Anaheim residents (85%) commute to jobs in locations outside of the city • Similarly, 85% of people employed in Anaheim commute from other locations ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.14 demographic analysis: occupation and industry of workers • The occupations of Anaheim residents typically differ from the occupations of residents of North Orange County and Orange County overall – A high share in service (20% vs. 17% in North Orange County and 16% in Orange County) and production, transportation, and material moving (16% vs. 12% in North Orange County and 10% in Orange County) – A lower proportion in Management, Business, Science, and Arts (28% vs. 36% in North Orange County and 40% in Orange County) • However, employment by industry is generally similar between geographies – higher share of Anaheim residents employed in Arts, Entertainment, Recreation, and Accommodation & Food Service – Marginally lower share of Anaheim residents employed in Professional, Scientific, Management & Administrative and Educational, and Health & Social Services industries ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.15 economic profile: job change, orange county (2007-2010) • Employment Development Department (EDD) data was used to compare jobs in Orange County by sector pre-financial crisis (3rd Quarter 2007) vs. 3rd Quarter 2010 • The largest sectors in 2010 were manufacturing retail trade and accommodation and food services (10%) – These were also the largest sectors in 2007 • Orange County lost a significant number of jobs between 2007 and 2010 – A 10% decrease in jobs overall – The largest decreases were in construction (37,247 jobs), manufacturing (25,342 jobs), and retail trade (21,083 jobs) • A limited number of sectors increased in employment – The most significant increases in healthcare and social assistance (10,171 jobs) and non-classified jobs (2,805 jobs) ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.16 economic profile: growing industry sectors, orange county • Technology employment is generally diverse in Orange County, but overall growth is stagnant • There is potential growth foreseen in Biotechnology and Defense/Aerospace sectors, which could have a competitive advantage in a location like Anaheim Canyon • Healthcare, education and communications sectors continue to experience overall growth in Orange County despite ongoing economic challenges ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.17 economic profile: industries by sector, anaheim canyon • Anaheim Canyon is a major industrial and back-office employment area in Orange County • 22% of all jobs in Anaheim and 18% of all firms are located in Anaheim Canyon • There is strong concentration of manufacturing, construction wholesale trade, real estate leasing and professional, technical and scientific services firms in Anaheim Canyon Businesses by Industry, Anaheim Canyon, 2011 Business Category Number % of Total Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting 7 0.2% Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 2 0.1% Utilities 4 0.1% Construction 407 13.8% Manufacturing 519 17.6% Wholesale Trade 258 8.7% Retail Trade 225 7.6% Transportation and Warehousing 108 3.7% Information 47 1.6% Finance and Insurance 40 1.4% Real Estate Rental and Leasing 387 13.1% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 300 10.2% Management of Companies and Enterprises 6 0.2% Administrative and Support and Waste Management 118 4.0% Educational Services 21 0.7% Health Care and Social Assistance 44 1.5% Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 37 1.3% Accommodation and Food Services 49 1.7% Other Services (except Public Administration) 148 5.0% Public Administration 4 0.1% Unknown 222 7.5% Total 2,953 100.0% Note: Categories used here are based on NAICS Code as assigned by City staff and noted in the City of Anaheim's business license application. Sources: City of Anaheim; BAE, 2011. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.18 economic profile: businesses by square feet occupied, anaheim canyon • Nearly 30% of all commercial spaces in Anaheim Canyon are occupied by manufacturing uses, with another 29% used for wholesale and retail trade • Other major categories include health care (Kaiser) and personal and business services Occupied Commercial Square Footage by Business Type, Anaheim Canyon Business Type Sq. Ft. % Agriculture and Mining 46,775 0.4% Construction and Manufacturing 715,592 6.5% Manufacturing 3,225,865 29.4% Transportation 290,347 2.6% Communications and Utilities 169,660 1.5% Wholesale and Retail 3,168,040 28.9% Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 155,602 1.4% Lodging and Recreation 223,650 2.0% Personal and Business Services 1,134,005 10.3% Automotive and Repairs 197,500 1.8% Health and Social Services 1,483,250 13.5% Legal 16,000 0.1% Education 65,790 0.6% Membership Organizations 27,500 0.3% Government 20,500 0.2% Not Classified 16,750 0.2% Total 10,956,826 100.0% Sources: City of Anaheim, 2012; Inside Prospects, 2012; BAE, 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.19 economic profile: building types, anaheim canyon • The majority of existing space is industrial, primarily focused on manufacturing and repair uses • Flex, medical and office buildings make up the balance of existing building types in Anaheim Canyon Occupied Commercial Square Footage by Building Type, Anaheim Canyon Building Type Sq. Ft. Education 36,000 Flex 1,571,624 Hotels 82,000 Industrial 7,043,624 Medical 1,421,300 Office 514,528 Religious 1,750 Retail 270,550 Unknown 15,450 Total 10,956,826 Sources: Inside Prospects, 2012; BAE, 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.20 economic profile: vacant and underutilized sites • There are a large number of vacant and underutilized sites in Anaheim Canyon, including – 208 vacant parcels (including publically owned and undevelopable parcels) – 330 underutilized properties (where building value = 90% or less of appraised land value) • Some existing buildings are obsolete for contemporary industrial and office uses, and many others would be suitable for future adaptive reuse for back office, flex or light industrial uses Improvement to Land Value, Anaheim Canyon Parcels Improvement Number Total to Land Value of Parcels Acreage Zero 208 561 Greater than 0, up to 90% 330 691 91% to 150% 298 449 150% and up 422 515 Total 1,258 2,217 Note: Properties with a land value equal to zero are included with the properties with an improvement to land ratio equal to zero. Sources: Tax Assessor Parcel Data, 2011; BAE, 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.21 economic profile: vacant and underutilized sites ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.22 real estate market analysis: for sale residential market trends • For sale housing prices in both Orange County and Anaheim have declined over the past year – The rate of decline in Anaheim (4.29% between October 2010 and October 2011) was slower than the rate of decline in Orange County overall (7.79% during the same period), but still significant • Median single family home sale prices in Anaheim are lower than the County median – Median sales prices in zip codes 92806 and 92807, which encompass Anaheim Canyon, were $370,000 and $482,000, respectively, in 3rd quarter 2011 (countywide median sales prices were $485,000) – Higher sales prices in the 92807 zip code are likely attributable to sales south of SR 91 which are located within this zip code ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.23 real estate market analysis: rental residential market trends • Anaheim Canyon has one large multifamily development, The Crossing – The Crossing is a 312-unit development located adjacent to the Metrolink station and incorporates a range of unit types and a high level of amenities • There are only a small number of large, professionally-managed multifamily housing developments in Anaheim Canyon zip codes • Market rents for units in these properties indicate potential support for new multifamily housing construction – Rents for a 2-bedroom unit at the Crossing range from $1,699 to $1,940 for a flat to $2,274 for a townhome – 1 mile from Anaheim Canyon, an older development that includes few amenities advertises rents at $1,510 to $1,570 for a 2-bedroom unit – One of the few new multifamily developments in the zip codes shared by Anaheim Canyon is adjacent to Angel Stadium and offers 2- bedroom units ranging from $2,135 to $4,844 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.24 real estate market analysis: office market conditions • Broker reports indicate that the Orange County office market is showing signs of a slow recovery – Positive absorption and declining vacancy rates in 2011 – However, vacancy rates countywide are 16%, suggesting a continued excess supply – Average lease rates were $1.94 per square foot in the 3rd quarter of 2011, stable compared to the previous quarter but down from $2.00 in the 3rd quarter of 2010 • Office construction has been minimal throughout the County • In Anaheim, the office market is generally weaker than in the County – Vacancy rates are higher (21.2%) – Lease rates are lower ($1.74 per square foot per month) ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.25 real estate market analysis: retail market conditions • The Orange County retail market is yet to make a full recovery, but there are indications that conditions are improving – During 1st quarter 2011, asking lease rates declined to $2.44 per sq. ft. and construction activity was stagnant – Over the same period, net absorption was positive (154,589 sq. ft.) and vacancy rates declined to 3.4% • The North County submarket, which includes the City of Anaheim, had both a lower vacancy rate and lower asking rents ($2.36 per sq. ft. than the County overall. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.26 real estate market analysis: industrial market conditions • The industrial market is showing signs of a moderate recovery in Orange County – Declining vacancy rates, moderate increases in average rents • Anaheim was competitive within the industrial market as of the 3rd quarter of 2011 – Anaheim contains 18% of the industrial square footage throughout Orange County – Anaheim had a 4% vacancy rate, lower than the County – Lease rates average $0.49 per square foot lower than the County ($0.54) • The market for research and development space was comparatively weak in Anaheim as of the 3rd quarter of 2011 – High vacancy rates (9.75% in Anaheim, 8.18% in Orange County) – Low lease rates ($0.59 in Anaheim, $0.88 in Orange County) ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.27 real estate market analysis: industrial market conditions • The industrial Flex market in Orange County has demonstrated declining asking rents and vacancy rates within the past year – Industrial Flex is space that is designed to be versatile, potentially accommodating industrial processing, R&D, office, or high-tech uses – Average countywide lease rates were $1.77 per square foot in 3rd quarter 2011, in comparison to $1.86 in 3rd quarter 2010 – Vacancy has declined from the 3rd quarter 2010 rate (19%) but remains at 17% • Anaheim has a limited market for industrial Flex space (industrial space with a minimum of 75% improved drop ceiling, a minimum parking ratio of 3.5 to 1,000 square feet, minimum of 3 elevators with full glassline, and with ground level loading doors possible) – There were only 31 industrial Flex properties in the City of Anaheim as of 3rd quarter 2011, totaling 629,114 square feet. – The vacancy rate among these properties is 14%, lower than the countywide rate (17%) but too high to indicate strong market support. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.28 real estate market analysis: industrial market conditions • The Inland Empire has a sizable industrial real estate market that competes with the Orange County industrial real estate market. – The North Orange County submarket, which includes the City of Anaheim, has lower asking rents than average for Orange County, but asking rents in the Inland Empire are still lower than asking rents in North Orange County by 1/3. – Despite higher rents, North Orange County has substantially lower industrial vacancy rates than the Inland Empire. Industrial Real Estate Market, Inland Empire and Orange County, 1st Quarter 2011 Rentable Vacancy Availability Net Average Asking Market Area (SF) Rate Rate Absorption (SF) Lease Rate North Orange County 109,809,185 2.7% 7.3% 696,964 $0.49 West Orange County 39,662,852 3.1% 9.1% (85,338) $0.55 Airport Area 69,159,353 4.9% 9.4% (397,329) $0.57 South Orange County 32,633,232 6.8% 11.6% (176,787) $0.73 Orange County Total 251,264,622 3.9% 8.7% 37,510 $0.57 Inland Empire West 152,230,274 8.3% 14.9% 1,238,466 $0.33 Inland Empire East 242,413,690 5.2% 11.5% 1,971,745 $0.33 Inland Empire Total 394,643,964 6.4% 12.8% 3,210,211 $0.33 Source: CBRE; BAE, 2011. Note: These data are for 1st quarter 2011 and are provided by CBRE, and therefore differ from 3rd quarter 2011 data presented above from Voit ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.29 real estate market analysis: extended stay hotel market • There is potential market support for extended stay hotel development Anaheim Canyon – Ten extended stay hotels were identified in North Orange County, including an Extended Stay America in Anaheim Canyon – Four of these ten hotels are located within 2 miles of Disneyland, Angel Stadium, and the Convention Center, and therefore are likely to serve a different market than other extended stay hotels in the area – Occupancy levels among the remaining six hotels fell from 74% (in 2006 and 2007) to about 62% during 2008 and 2009, but have since rebounded – Hotels generally require 70% to 75% occupancy to be profitable, and current occupancies among these properties average 78% • A higher-end extended stay hotel in Anaheim Canyon could serve a market niche that is not met by the existing supply ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.30 real estate market analysis: transit-oriented development (TOD) • Anaheim Canyon is served by the Metrolink regional transit system, but service is limited and ridership is low – The Anaheim Canyon station is located on the Inland Empire – Orange County line, which runs from San Bernardino to Oceanside – On weekdays, trains make seven stops in both directions, with wait times between trains ranging from 30 minutes to 4 hours – There are only a small number of boardings at the Anaheim Canyon station during an average weekday (310 daily in 4th quarter 2011), indicating that the station is currently a limited driver for real estate development in the area – As development of real estate and pedestrian infrastructure occurs in Anaheim Canyon over the long term, the area has the potential to accommodate demand for TOD, particularly from commuters from the Inland Empire ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.31 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.32 future market demand: non-residential square foot total • There is a net demand for 1.3 million square feet of office, 255k square feet of commercial, and 1.2 million square feet of industrial through 2035, based on CSUF projections and an assessment of local market trends Market Demand Estimates, Anaheim Canyon, 2010-2035 Jobs by Place of Work New Jobs Office Retail Industrial 2010-2035 Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Total New Jobs, 2010-2035 11,587 40.0% 4,635 10.0% 1,159 40% 4,635 Sq. Ft. per Employee 350 700 850 Projected Demand (Sq. Ft.) 1,622,180 811,090 3,939,580 Less Planned and Proposed 291,638 556,048 2,699,760 Net Projected Demand (Sq. Ft.) 1,330,542 255,042 1,239,820 Notes: Jobs by place of work based on distribution of future demand as estimated by BAE. New jobs based on CSUF projections as benchmarked to the 2010 US Census. Sq. Ft. per employee based on Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Employment Density Study completed in 2001. Represents approximately 14% of total demand in the market area during the plan period. Sources: CSUF, 2012; BAE, 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.33 future market demand: non-residential acreage total • This demand translates to between 20.4 – 122.2 acres of office, 16.7 – 23.4 acres of retail, and 81.3 – 113.8 acres of industrial uses depending on applicable floor-area ratio (FAR) ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.34 future market demand: residential total • There is a net demand for 650 –1,256 multifamily residential units based on CSUF projections, residential land availability and an assessment of local market trends (1.2% - 3.0% of Market Area total) Total Residential Market Demand, 2010-2035 Market Area New Housing Units, 2010-2035 42,191 650 - 1,266 Acreage Demand at 20 DU/Acre 2,110 32.5 - 63.3 at 35 DU/Acre 1,205 18.6 - 36.2 at 60 DU/Acre 703 10.8 - 21.1 Notes: New households based on CSUF Projections benchmarked to the 2010 US Census. The market area encompasses Northern Orange County. Lower end of demand estimate range for Anaheim Canyon represents existing projections from CSUF. Top half of range represents 3% capture rate of overall market demand during the Plan period. Sources: California State University Fullerton, Center for Demographic Research, 2012; BAE, 2012. Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.35 potential development product types • Based on the analysis conducted in this market assessment, there is a potential for the following development product types in Anaheim Canyon: – Industrial production and repair space – Research & Development – Flex space – Limited back office uses related to existing industry needs in the market area – Small increments of retail to fill need for full-service restaurants to serve the local business community – Limited higher density residential development adjacent to Metrolink light rail – Extended stay hotel that provides a high level of amenities ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.36 economics and market conditions findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.37 • Anaheim Canyon is a major business and employment center in Orange County • The area contains 18% of the City’s businesses and approximately 22% of the City’s job base economics and market conditions summary ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.38 • Anaheim’s current unemployment rate is 11%, the highest in Orange County • The largest employment sectors in the City include Manufacturing Retail Trade and Accommodation and Food Service (10%) • The vast majority of Anaheim residents (85%) commute to jobs located outside of Anaheim • Anaheim has larger average household sizes but fewer owner- occupied households (49%) than Orange County overall (unincorporated plus cities) • Anaheim’s annual median income is $56,000, which is $16,000 less than the rest of Orange County economics and market conditions findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.39 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim Canyon is a major employment area with approximately 39,000 jobs as of 2010 • Projections from the Southern California Association of Governments estimate that jobs in the Planning Area will increase by over 11,500(13% of market area total) by 2035 • Future housing demand within the Planning Area will be linked primarily to transit oriented development (TOD) adjacent or near the Metrolink station • Future housing demand is expected to include units in Anaheim Canyon between 2010 and 2035 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.40 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim has a relatively weak office market compared to the rest of Orange County overall (lower lease rates combined with high vacancy rates for Class A office space) • Anaheim Canyon is one of the major industrial nodes in Orange County, and increasingly competes with the Inland Empire • There is an improving industrial segment with declining vacancy rates in Anaheim • Lease rates for industrial space in Anaheim Canyon are lower than the Orange County average, but higher than Inland Empire based on the type and quality of space as well as the competitive location ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.41 economics and market conditions findings • In Anaheim and in Orange County overall, Research and Development (R&D) and Flex markets are improving more slowly than the overall industrial market • Anaheim Canyon is not considered a strong location for warehouse/ distribution and advanced logistics uses based on cost, but is considered a strong location for an industrial production, repair and research node within the larger Southern California marketplace ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.42 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim Canyon is an excellent location for attracting industrial and office workforce Los Angeles County, the Inland Empire and other parts of Orange County • The area has convenient access to intermediate inputs (supplies in the industrial supply chain) as well as critical repair and technical services • The area is within easy driving distance to executive housing in desirable residential areas of Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.43 economics and market conditions findings • The City-owned municipal utility provides low-cost power to industrial and office users • The Enterprise Zone designation provides existing and new businesses with a variety of financial and tax incentives to encourage growth and expansion • Anaheim has a supportive regulatory climate and low-cost of doing business when compared to other business park locations ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.44 economics and market conditions findings • Anaheim Canyon suffers from a lack of retail and food service amenities, a lack of recreational amenities for local workers, and old or outdated public infrastructure (roads, sidewalks and public spaces) • There are also some older industrial, office and retail buildings that are obsolete for current market needs and in need of rehabilitation • Some encroaching non-business uses in certain areas of Anaheim Canyon may be incompatible with existing or future industrial uses ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.45 • Continue to take advantage of Anaheim Canyon’s strong competitive location for moderately priced industrial space oriented to users in a variety of industries such as aerospace suppliers, biosciences, medical devices and green industries • Create new food service, restaurants and retail spaces that serve daytime customers • Pursue the potential demand for higher-amenity extended-stay hotels that serve local businesses as well as the medical/health cluster • Pursue the increased demand for high-density residential, office and retail development surrounding the Metrolink commuter rail station over the medium- to long-term (5-15 years) • Create quality Flex space to capture this product type as the technology economy improves economics and market conditions opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.46 economics and market conditions opportunities • Take advantage of vacant and underutilized sites throughout Anaheim Canyon • Promote and support strategic commercial sites at major intersections (including underutilized commercial properties at Tustin and La Palma) • Expand opportunities for residential and mixed-use development sites within ¼ to ½ mile of the Metrolink Station ---PAGE BREAK--- 3.47 Future Land Use Demand Summary (2010-2035) * Estimate range varies depending on unit density and floor area ratio (FAR) Sources: CSUF, 2012; BAE, 2012 economics and market conditions opportunities Type Acres Units/Square Feet Residential 11-63* 650 – 1,256 units Office 20-122* 1,330,542 sq. ft. Retail 17-23* 255,042 sq. ft. Industrial 81-114* 1,239,820 sq. ft. ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.1 4.1 4 I mobility ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.2 4.2 mobility This section is broken down into the following topics: • Street and Freeway Network • Traffic Operations • Pedestrian and Bicycle Network • Transit • Findings and Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.3 4.3 street and freeway network ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.4 4.4 regional freeway network • Riverside Freeway (SR-91) – East-west freeway provides regional access to San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles Counties – Four general purpose lanes and one HOV lane in each direction of travel – Annual average daily traffic (AADT) values (Caltrans, 2010) • 223,000 at SR-57 • 215,500 at Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street • 230,800 at Tustin Avenue • 321,000 at SR-55 • 302,000 at Lakeview Avenue • 255,000 at Imperial Highway/SR- 90 – Freeway improvement projects planned/in progress for SR-91 • Addition of one general purpose lane in each direction, east of SR-55 • Four to six-lane elevated freeway over median between SR-241 and I-15 • Addition of auxiliary lanes between SR-241 and SR-71 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.5 4.5 regional freeway network • Orange Freeway (SR-57) – North-south freeway provides access between Los Angeles County at SR-60 and Orange County at SR-22 – Four general purpose lanes and one HOV lane in each direction of travel – AADT values (Caltrans, 2010) • 292,000 at SR-91 • 295,000 at Orangethorpe Avenue – Freeway improvement projects planned/in progress for SR-57 • Addition of one NB auxiliary lane from Katella Avenue to Lincoln Avenue • Addition of one SB auxiliary lane from Ball Road to Katella Avenue • Addition of one NB through lane at SR-91 • Addition of an HOV ramp at Douglass Road ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.6 4.6 regional freeway network • Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) – North-south freeway in Orange County provides access between SR-91 and the City of Costa Mesa – Four general purpose lanes and one HOV lane in each direction of travel – AADT values (Caltrans, 2010) • 227,000 at Lincoln Avenue/Nohl Ranch Canyon Road ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.7 4.7 local street network Local Street Direction of Travel Number of Lanes Roadway Classification Posted Speed Limit Connection to Freeway Orangethorpe Avenue East/west 4D Major Arterial 50 SR-57 Miraloma Avenue East/west 4D Secondary Arterial 45/25 La Palma Avenue East/west 6D Primary Arterial 45 Blue Gum Street North/south 4D Secondary Arterial 40 Red Gum Street North/south 2U Collector 35 Kraemer Boulevard North/south 4D/6D Primary Arterial 40 SR-91 Miller Street North/south 2D Secondary Arterial 45 Tustin Avenue North/south 6D Major Arterial 40 SR-91 Van Buren Street North/south 2U Collector 40 Lakeview Avenue North/south 4D Primary Arterial 35/40 SR-91 Kellogg Drive North/south 4D Secondary Arterial 40 Imperial Highway (SR-90) North/south 6D Major Arterial 45 SR-91 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.8 4.8 local street network classifications ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.9 4.9 speed limits ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.10 4.10 average daily traffic (ADT) volumes ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.11 4.11 intersection level of service (LOS) criteria Level of Service Description Volume-to- Capacity (V/C) Ratio A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length. 0.000-0.600 B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle 0.601-0.700 C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle Individual cycle failures begin to appear. 0.701-0.800 D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 0.801-0.900 E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. 0.901-1.000 F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle Greater than 1.000 Source: Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000). ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.12 4.12 deficient level of service (LOS) locations Intersection Peak Hour V/C LOS La Palma Avenue / Kraemer Boulevard PM 1.083 F Source: Kaiser Permanente Orange County Anaheim Medical Center Draft EIR, Parsons, 2007 Roadway Segment Lanes Daily Volume LOS Kraemer Boulevard between SR-91 and La Palma Avenue 6D 52,910 E Tustin Avenue between SR-91 and La Palma Avenue 7D 58,920 D Source: Kaiser Permanente Orange County Anaheim Medical Center Draft EIR, Parsons, 2007 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.13 4.13 pedestrian facilities • Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks and trails Pedestrians on Lakeview Avenue ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.14 4.14 pedestrian facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.15 4.15 pedestrian facilities Sidewalks • While most newer areas of Anaheim Canyon include sidewalks, there are large gaps in the sidewalk system and barriers to pedestrian travel • Many businesses in the Planning Area do not have sidewalk access to intersections and attractions restaurants and bus stops) Missing and obstructed sidewalks place people in harms way ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.16 4.16 pedestrian facilities Crosswalks • Most major intersections include striped crosswalks • There are some existing crosswalk deficiencies, including a lack of crosswalks in all directions of travel, non-signalized mid-block crossings, and wide streets which result in long crossings ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.17 4.17 bicycle facilities • There are three types of bicycle facilities – Class I Bikeways provide travel on right-of-way (ROW) separate from street – Class II Bikeways provide striped and signed lanes within street ROW – Class III Bikeways are signed bike routes 2-Lane Divided Section with Bike Lanes and Pedestrian Crossing Signs (Miller Avenue) ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.18 4.18 bicycle facilities • The Santa Ana Regional Bike Path is a Class I bikeway located along the southern bank of the Santa Ana River ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.19 bicycle facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.20 4.20 bicycle facilities No bike lanes with railroad crossing ahead • While there are a few Class I and II bikeways in the area, there is an overall lack of complete bikeway connections in all travel directions • Many bikeways do not connect to bus stops, reducing travel options ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.21 4.21 transit • The Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) serves all of Orange County with connections to Metrolink and 91 Express Lanes • OCTA operates 5 local bus routes, 3 shuttle routes, 2 intra-county express routes, and 2 rail feeder routes in Anaheim Canyon • The local bus fare is $1.50 for youth and adults, $0.60 for seniors and disabled Bus stop on La Palma Avenue No sidewalk leading to bus stop ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.22 4.22 transit • Metrolink’s Inland Empire-Orange County line serves San Bernardino to San Diego County • Metrolink’s Anaheim Canyon Station is served by 15 trains on weekdays and 4 trains on weekends • The Anaheim Canyon Station includes on-site parking and bike racks • Proposed improvements at the Anaheim Canyon station include a redesign of platforms to Metrolink standards, constructing a pedestrian undercrossing, installing bus bays at the front of the station, providing additional parking spaces, and enhancing shelters and benches for riders ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.23 4.23 transit • Construction of the Placentia Station is anticipated to begin during 2012/13 and will be part of Metrolink’s 91 Line, extending to Riverside, Fullerton and downtown Los Angeles • This station will provide additional rider service to the Anaheim Canyon region and will be equipped with restrooms and a 500- space parking facility • This station will also provide direct connectivity to areas not currently served by the Anaheim Canyon Station ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.24 4.24 mobility findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.25 mobility summary • Anaheim Canyon has good access to regional freeways • The area includes many multi-modal options, including Metrolink, bike trails and transit ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.26 • Anaheim Canyon is primarily an auto-oriented area • Most vehicular congestion occurs near freeway interchanges • While Anaheim Canyon has the right characteristics for pedestrian and bicycle mobility (flat, access to transit, mild climate), the current system has many gaps and barriers • There is a lack of basic amenities at bus stops throughout Anaheim Canyon mobility findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.27 mobility opportunities Roadways • Create consistent lane widths on roads throughout Anaheim Canyon to increase safe driving conditions and decrease merging congestion (lane drops along the same arterial can lead to unnecessary delay or congestion at merging points) • Restripe faded lane stripes and markings to improve pedestrian, bicyclist and vehicular safety • Consider creating consistent speed limits along the same arterial to improve roadway traffic flow • Provide additional lane capacity at intersections or improved and coordinated signal timing along corridors experiencing high volumes of traffic ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.28 mobility opportunities Transit Work with OCTA to: • Add additional bus routes and stops on major roadways • Provide bus routes that will connect Anaheim Canyon to the planned train station in Placentia • Install pockets or bulb-outs at bus stops to provide safe waiting and loading areas for passengers • Provide safe loading/unloading platforms for all riders • Improve pedestrian connectivity to transit • Encourage shuttles to employment centers • Improve coordination of bus schedules and stops ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.29 mobility opportunities Sidewalks • Establish a complete sidewalk network in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards – Minimum of 44” of unobstructed sidewalk width – Maximum of ½” of vertical obstructions – Curb ramps at intersections and driveways – Pedestrian push buttons at intersections • Create a safer walking environment by: – Providing crosswalks at Kraemer Boulevard and Lakeview Avenue Freeway interchanges, in coordination with Caltrans – Installing pedestrian bulb-outs at wide intersection crossings – Upgrading push buttons and countdown signals – Installing pedestrian signals at mid-block crosswalks – Providing accessibility between office and retail land uses – Installing additional pathways consistent with Urban Greening Plan currently under preparation ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.30 mobility opportunities Bike Facilities • Create bike lanes to major north-south and east-west corridors • Implement the Anaheim Outdoors Connectivity Plan which will identify additional bicycle facilities • Create a pedestrian/bicycle corridor along Miraloma Avenue • Create additional bikeways that connect to bus stops • Connect existing and new bike paths to the regional Santa Ana River Trail via improved road bridges and/or a new pedestrian/bike bridge ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.1 5.1 5 I infrastructure ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.2 5.2 infrastructure • This section is divided into the following topics: – Storm Water – Recycled Water – Domestic Water – Sanitary Sewer – Other Utilities – Findings and Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.3 5.3 storm water • The existing City storm drain system functions well for flood control in Anaheim Canyon • Storm drainage main lines exist on most major roadways in Anaheim Canyon and connect to County channels or the Santa Ana River • There are areas with the City’s right- of-way around channels, storm drain pipes and groundwater recharge basins suitable for low flow and stormwater capture, treatment and infiltration ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.4 5.4 storm drain facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.5 5.5 recycled water • The Orange County Water District owns and operates several large regional groundwater recharge basins in Anaheim Canyon • The District operates a treatment plant in Fountain Valley and conveys the highly treated recycled water through a mainline for groundwater recharge near the corner of Kraemer Boulevard and Miraloma Avenue in Anaheim Canyon Existing flood control and groundwater basin recharge facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.6 5.6 recycled water • Malcom Pirnie, a water engineering consulting firm, conducted a cost-benefit analysis for the City that demonstrated positive economic, environmental and social metrics for replacing commercial potable water uses with recycled water delivered by this system • The City is also considering Building Code changes that allow for “dual plumbing” in buildings (recycled water) which will also contribute to Water Conservation ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.7 5.7 recycled water ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.8 5.8 domestic water • The City has a well managed and extensive system for domestic water in the Project Area • The City acts as its own potable water agency • The City’s main sources of supply are local groundwater and imported water provided by the Metropolitan Water District • The City’s current system has the capacity for expanding or adding additional water transmission mains ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.9 5.9 domestic water facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.10 5.10 sanitary sewer • The City has a well managed and extensive sanitary sewer system in the Project Area • The City acts as its own sewer collection and service agency • The Orange County Sanitation District operates a trunkline sewer collection system which conveys sewage from the City system to the OCSD treatment plant for treatment, reuse and disposal • The City’s current system has capacity to accommodate additional development in most parts of Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.11 5.11 sanitary sewer facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.12 5.12 other utilities • The City acts as its own power provider and cooperates with Southern California Edison • The City maintains a power delivery network and recently added a natural gas fired Power Plant in the Project Area • Natural gas is generally available in the Project Area from the Southern California Gas Company • Broadband and telecommunications are also available through a fiber optic system (City Fiber) and cable (Time Warner/AT&T) • These utility systems follow the road network and are both underground and on overhead poles ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.13 5.13 infrastructure findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.14 infrastructure summary and findings • The City of Anaheim is the area’s water and power provider and maintains an adequate and reliable infrastructure system for Anaheim Canyon • The Orange County Water District’s Recycled Water system provides important benefits to Anaheim Canyon businesses • Eastern portions of Anaheim, including Anaheim Canyon, have some deficiencies for sewer infrastructure. • The extensive existing power, natural gas, broadband and telecommunications networks serve and attract commercial uses in the Project Area ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.15 infrastructure opportunities Storm Water • Further promote the existing “capture, clean and use” strategy for storm water management • Redesign and rebuild the storm drain system to accommodate the water quality best management practices with regionally beneficial environmental improvements including: – Catch basin screening systems – Biofiltration swales and treatment wetlands in Right-of-Way open space areas or building setbacks – Channel, culvert or infiltration basin impoundments for capture of dry weather flow and/or stormwater for infiltration or passive irrigation of natural open spaces or landscape areas and/or for habitat creation • Create more pervious surfaces throughout the Project Area to help filter stormwater and recharge groundwater • Consider creating a “mitigation bank” for regional water quality facilities to relieve new businesses of fees or impacts ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.16 infrastructure opportunities Recycled Water and Sewer • Work with the Orange County Water District to identify ways for expanding recycled water supply and delivery in Anaheim Canyon • Identify ways to attract businesses to Anaheim Canyon that will benefit from the high quality recycled water • Facilitate recycled water distribution to assist interested businesses to obtain LEED certification • Reduce water and sewer system demands by encouraging low flow fixtures and reuse grey water rather than discharging it into public sewers • Coordinate with developers to meet recommendations according to the City’s current sewer study. • Work with developers to verify existing sewer capacity for proposed developments beyond current zoning and consider recommendations for needed improvements to the City’s existing sewer infrastructure. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5.17 infrastructure opportunities Other Utilities • Continue to place all overhead power and telecommunications lines underground to improve system reliability and aesthetics • Consider power rate discounts for “clean tech” businesses plus encourage on-site solar energy panels for commercial roof tops and parking structures • Consider co-developing a Project Area WiFi network enabling continuous connectivity for workers, visitors and commercial enterprises ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.1 6.1 6 I sustainability ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.2 6.2 sustainability • This section is a summary of existing City programs and achievements related to sustainability, and is broken down into the following sections: – Carbon Sequestration – Vehicle Trip Reduction – Non-Vehicular Circulation – Green Buildings and Developments – Renewable Energy Generation – Water Efficiency – Waste Reduction and Recycling – Findings and Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.3 6.3 • Carbon sequestration is typically achieved by increasing open space and parkland, and planting trees • City is achieving carbon sequestration goals through: – Their 46 parks and two 18-hole golf courses (700 acres) – The Tree Power Program which has a goal to plant >40,000 shade trees – The active management of over 70,000 street trees located in public right-of-way throughout the City – A park standard of 2 acres of park and recreation space/1000 people (AMC 17.08.230) – The requirement of 1 canopy tree/20 feet street frontage and 1 tree/3,000 s.f. of parking area carbon sequestration Pearson Park ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.4 6.4 • The City targets reducing commuter vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and the associated greenhouse gas emissions through encouraging: – Staff shuttles to/from train stations – Rideshare and vanpool programs – Carpool parking spaces – Teleconferencing/telecommuting to reduce miles traveled vehicle trip reduction ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.5 6.5 • The City has an extensive existing bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails system, including: – 25 miles of combined regional and city trails devoted to hiking and equestrian use – 28.5 miles of bicycle trails • The City supports and promotes bicycle travel via the OCTA bus system, the Metrolink commuter rail service, and Amtrak • The City is currently preparing a citywide connectivity plan non-vehicular circulation ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.6 6.6 green buildings and developments • Anaheim Public Utilities currently has incentive programs to increase energy efficiency, water conservation and other green elements – Incentives for residential and commercial energy efficiency (City waives permit fees) – Incentives for low income energy efficiency retrofits – Incentives for energy efficient new construction – Incentives for residential and commercial water conservation retrofits (SmarTimer and rotating nozzles) ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.7 6.7 • Anaheim Public Utilities Renewable Portfolio includes renewable energy targets of 25% by 2016 and 33% by 2020 • The City has a program to create new parks in utility right-of-ways green buildings and developments ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.8 6.8 green buildings and developments • The City has been designated an EcoCity by the Orange County Chapter of the US Green Building Council • The City requires LEED certification for City-owned projects >10,000 s.f. • There are currently 10 LEED certified projects in Anaheim, including: – Anaheim Convention Center (LEED-EB:O&M) – Haskett Branch Library (LEED-NC) – City Hall West TI (LEED-CI) LEED certified Anaheim Convention Center ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.9 6.9 • The City’s Residential Appliance Incentives will invest $52 million over 10 years • The City conducted energy audits for all City facilities that resulted in several upgrades, including replacement of water utility pump station motor and variable frequency drives, and Cool Roof installation at Fire Station 1 and Sunkist Library green buildings and developments ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.10 6.10 • The City currently receives 16% of its energy from renewable resources (wind, geothermal, solar, landfill gas, hydroelectric) • The City’s Solar Programs includes: – Solar Advantage Program began in 2000, 5.2 MW of solar has been installed – Residential, Commercial Incentives – Schools grant program – Solar Mapping: www.anaheim.net/SolarMap/ • Project examples include Energy Field, Anaheim Convention Center, Police Department East, Hermosa Village, and Sun Power for the Schools renewable energy generation Alternative energy options ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.11 6.11 • The City’s Green Connection includes a goal to decrease citywide water use by 15% by 2015 • In order to achieve this, the City established a 15% water conservation goal in 1993, which was surpassed in June 2009 with a 15.57% citywide water use reduction • Since 1993, 84 billion gallons saved through conservation efforts, primarily through the installation of 27,000+ residential high efficiency and low-flush toilets • The City has an award-winning annual Water Awareness Month Campaign and water efficient landscaping guidelines: http://www.anaheim.net/utilities/waterservices/landscapeguidelines.pdf water efficiency ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.12 6.12 • The County of Orange operates one of four household hazardous waste collection facilities (paint, cleaning agents, batteries, and electronic- waste) in the City of Anaheim • Republic Services and City sponsor free residential curbside e-waste collection, including neighborhood cleanup campaigns to dispose of large items that do not fit in conventional trash containers. • The Fire Department oversees a Used Oil Block Grant program, which includes $85,000 a year for educating the public on used oil recycling and disposal (in 2008 over 45,000 gallons of used oil was recycled) • The Parks Division oversees an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program • The City implements the Big Green Box battery recycling program waste reduction and recycling ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.13 6.13 • City currently diverts 65% of its waste from landfills • The City has various waste reduction and recycling facilities and programs, including: – An Anaheim-based Material Recovery Facility – Rebates for refrigerator recycling – City sponsored residential compost giveaway – Program to use tree trimming as mulch and ground cover – Program to promote the use of recyclable grocery bags waste reduction and recycling ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.14 6.14 sustainability findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.15 sustainability summary • Local and regional sustainability is an important topic related both to quality of life and economic development • There are many state, regional and local laws, policies and programs that require sustainability at the local level (see Section 8) • The City joined the California Climate Action Registry in 2003 and reports emission totals each year ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.16 sustainability findings • The City has an obligation, through a series of state and regional regulations, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve sustainability citywide, and capture/reuse stormwater at new and redeveloped sites (see Section 8) • The City has an extensive array of green building and sustainability- related programs and incentives • The City has very high standards for energy efficiency, including LEED certification, in City-owned buildings ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.17 6.17 • Continue to encourage LEED certification on all new non-residential buildings – CALGreen Tiers and/or GreenPoint Rated could be considered for certain building types • Identify additional ways to reduce citywide greenhouse gas emissions through land use decisions: – Zoning options: e.g. form based zoning, increased density, outdoor lighting requirements – Consider using non-electrified traffic control roundabouts) – Protect and rehabilitate open space/habitat areas • Promote multi-modal transportation options throughout Anaheim Canyon future opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.18 6.18 • Expand bike and pedestrian facilities and amenities • District scale solutions energy generation, stormwater management, waste heat reuse, bulk purchasing for business owners, vehicle idling prohibition, food waste composting) • Continue to work with the Orange County Water District to identify opportunities for using storm and irrigation water to help recharge the groundwater basin future opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.1 7.1 7.1 7 I identity and branding ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.2 7.2 7.2 identity and branding • This section is divided into the following topics: – What is Place-Based Branding? – Current Brand and Identity – Image of Anaheim Canyon – Findings and Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.3 7.3 7.3 • More than just a logo • Connects people to place – Build ownership, loyalty and excitement • Creates an emotional connection • Makes intellectual sense • Is truthful and built on fact and tangible attributes • Is aspirational and promises something more • Encompasses – Physical Environment – Marketing Materials – Signage – Communications what is place-based branding? ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.4 7.4 7.4 • Why does (a good) identity matter? – A lack of a unified identity was one of the top issues identified from background surveys conducted by the City • An identity: – Influences perceptions and decisions – Creates higher marketability – Provides a sense of ownership and loyalty – Attracts both employers and employees – Offers a link for otherwise disconnected uses or ideas what is place-based branding? ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.5 7.5 7.5 • The project consultants compared nine cities with similar and/or desirable elements in California • Anaheim has the highest number of small businesses • Areas where other desirable cities shine: – Number of patents issued – Percentage of residents with a Bachelors degree – Low unemployment – High median income • Common traits include access to freeways and transport Cities Compared: • Orange • Riverside • Irvine • Garden Grove • Corona • Santa Ana • Hayward • Santa Clara • Fremont what is place-based branding? ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.6 7.6 7.6 Inconsistent signage and images • Signage is inconsistent in both names and style • Signage design should reflect vision for area ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.7 7.7 7.7 the hierarchy of brand is not clear • It is not clear what is more important? Anaheim? Or the Canyon Brand? • One brand should reign over the other or be presented as co-brands • A signage plan with guidelines for placement, size, design, and color needs to be developed and incorporated into the Policy for area ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.8 7.8 7.8 there are mix messages… • What is the positioning and marketing message for the Canyon? • All communications should reflect the vision and positioning • Clear brand guidelines with consistent messages need to be developed for businesses and collaborators Anaheim’s Chamber of Commerce publication ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.9 7.9 7.9 lack of unity • Background surveys and focus groups by the City indicate a lack of clarity on what Anaheim Canyon means to a business • No single characteristic stood out to distinguish the Canyon for visitors or employers • Need to create a stronger more compelling brand or strengthen existing brand ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.10 7.10 7.10 perception of anaheim canyon Anaheim Canyon’s image from major freeways ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.11 7.11 7.11 perception of anaheim canyon Image within Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.12 7.12 7.12 perception of anaheim canyon Anaheim Canyon’s image from major gateways ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.13 7.13 7.13 identity and branding findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.14 identity and branding summary • A lack of a unified identity was one of the top issues identified from background surveys conducted by the City • An identity: – Influences perceptions and decisions – Creates higher marketability – Provides a sense of ownership and loyalty – Attracts both employers and employees – Offers a common link for otherwise disconnected uses or ideas ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.15 • Anaheim Canyon currently has no unique sense of place – where is the “there”? • There is a lack of a consistent brand use and signage • It is unclear whether the name “Anaheim Canyon” resonates with the community • There is no distinctive element that defines the Anaheim Canyon area • The existing large roadways and the lack of amenities reduce pedestrian and bicycle connections to the area from surrounding neighborhoods identity and branding findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 7.16 • Create gateways that are focal points for arrival and provide better sense of place • Expand freeway “image” for better exposure • Leverage new and refurbished businesses in key locations that reinforce the brand • Create a consistent signage policy to unify the area • Build an identity and brand that resonates with employers and visitors • Develop clear brand guidelines for businesses and partners to ensure consistency identity and branding opportunities Key Gateway to the Canyon Leverage strong business to build brand value ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.1 8 I regulatory setting ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.2 regulatory setting • This section is divided into the following topics: – City Plans and Regulations – Regional Plans and Regulations – Recent State and Federal Plans and Regulations ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.3 city plans and regulations • City of Anaheim General Plan, 2004 • Northeast Area Specific Plan, 1995 • PacifiCenter Anaheim Specific Plan, 1999 • Regulatory Relief Task Force Recommendations, 2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.4 2.4 city general plan • The General Plan is the City’s principal policy document that guides citywide land use and environmental decisions • It includes a Land Use Plan, land use designations and standards, goals, policies, and programs ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.5 city general plan • The Land Use Element includes a specific section for Anaheim Canyon, which identifies the City’s goal of the area as follows: – Preserve and project the image of The Canyon as one of the most prominent business centers in Orange County • The goal section also includes policies focused on: – Encouraging economic growth – Providing a mix of land uses – Improving multi-modal connections ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.6 city general plan • Green Element includes goals to: – Reduce vehicle emissions through traffic flow improvements, e.g. traffic signal Intelligent Transportation Systems, the Scoot Adaptive Traffic Control System, and related capital improvements. – Address the jobs-housing balance by developing housing in proximity to local job centers – Encourage development that provide on-site amenities to lesson vehicle trips, e.g. on-site day care facilities, cafeterias, automated teller machines and bicycle storage facilities. – Encourage increased use of passive / active solar design in existing and new development (e.g. orient buildings to maximize exposure to prevailing winds and locating landscaping to shade buildings). – Encourage energy-efficient retrofitting of existing buildings. – Maximize opportunities to install local or regional groundwater recharge facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.7 city general plan • Public Services and Facilities Element includes goals to: – Examine and utilize the use of alternative water supplies, such as grey water and reclaimed water, where appropriate and feasible – Continue to sponsor and provide water conservation and education programs. – Minimize the amount of impervious surfaces in conjunction with new development. ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.8 Emission reduction goals and measures included in the General Plan: • In accordance with the General Plan, approximately 30 miles (50%) of the traffic lights on the City’s arterials have been and coordinated over the last four years, with the goal of reducing vehicle delay (idling emissions) by 20% • City is committed to reducing the amount of fossil fuel consumed by: – Creating Adaptive Traffic Control System to optimize signal timing (General Plan) – Creating Intelligent Transportation Systems to decrease congestion – Creating Fuel Saving Driving Tips programs for all City drivers – Reducing evaporative emissions from gasoline dispensing by 95% (CARB Enhanced Vapor Recovery Regulations) city general plan ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.9 northeast area specific plan • The Northeast Area Specific Plan covers most of Anaheim Canyon and was adopted in 1995 • The plan envisions a total of approximately 30 million square feet of employment uses ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.10 northeast area specific plan • Objective – To establish a regulatory framework that would foster the development of well-designed, high-quality businesses and employment complexes which meet the needs of a growing population and are compatible with existing and future surrounding land uses. ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.11 northeast area specific plan • Major Goals from the Existing Plan: – Establish a mix of land uses based on economic, planning, and environmental considerations; – Improve the marketability of existing land uses; – Redevelop/improve underutilized parcels; – Optimize municipal revenues from sales/property taxes; – Generate sufficient revenue to fund public improvements; – Establish mechanisms to fund improvements; – Provide adequate public services and facilities; – Improve the overall appearance of the area; – Protect and enhance the integrity and desirability of industrial sites; and – Establish a blueprint to facilitate a mix of uses, a distinctive public-realm, and a pedestrian-oriented employment setting. ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.12 northeast area specific plan • Elements: – Design Guidelines – Zoning and Development Standards – Comprehensive Land Use Plan – Circulation Plan – Landscape Plan – Public Services and Facilities Plan – Implementation Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.13 northeast area specific plan • Development Areas – Industrial Area – Expanded Industrial Area – La Palma Core Area – Transit Core Area – Commercial Area – Open Space ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.14 pacificenter anaheim specific plan • The PacifiCenter Anaheim Specific Plan covers approximately 26 acres located north of the SR 91 and west of Tustin Avenue in Anaheim Canyon, adjacent to the Metrolink station ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.15 pacificenter anaheim specific plan • The first phase of the plan consisted of office retail, warehouse, and restaurant uses on approximately 9 acres • The remaining 17 acres of the site was planned as a high quality mixed-use center including offices, retail, restaurants and a hotel site • The development was designed to encourage transit usage and facilitate business operations • The plan includes project specific development standards, landscaping, design and signage requirements ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.16 regulatory relief task force recommendations • The City Council created a Task Force to review Anaheim’s current regulatory environment and recommend areas where bureaucracy and red tape could be eliminated in order to create more economic freedom and spur job creation • The Task Force made a series of recommendations (known as Phase 1) that identified specific ways the City can: – Build a freedom culture and reduce red tape – Streamline development processes – Reduce taxes and fees ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.17 regulatory relief task force recommendations • The City Council adopted the Phase 1 recommendations, which included 17 specific measures • Most measures related to City operations and protocols, however several call for reduced regulations and fees associated with new development • The Task Force is currently (2012) working to identify additional ways to increase economic freedom, reduce governmental regulations and their associated costs, and streamline processes ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.18 regional plans and regulations • SCAG Blueprint Objectives • Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) • South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Plans ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.19 scag compass blueprint objectives • In 2004, SCAG adopted the Compass Blueprint • The Compass Blueprint is a voluntary guidance document that identifies how and where an alternative future vision for southern California’s future can be implemented • The policies in the Compass Blueprint aim to reduce emissions of various pollutants and greenhouse gasses, increase mobility and accessibility, and improve quality of life through strategic land use changes • Goals for areas identified in the Compass Blueprint as growth opportunity areas include locating new housing near existing jobs and new jobs near existing housing, encouraging in-fill development, promoting development with a mix of uses, creating walkable communities, providing a mix of housing types, and focusing development in urban areas Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • Compass Blueprint is a voluntary guidance document ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.20 regional transportation plan • SCAG prepares a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) which is a comprehensive plan that identifies future regional transportation improvements and allocates federal and state transportation funds towards the construction of those improvements • The RTP was last updated in 2008, and is periodically updated every four years • Under SB 375, SCAG will need to link land use and housing to future infrastructure investment Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • The RTP focuses on investment/reinvestment in major roadways, in particular Freeways, which will have an direct impact on Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.21 south coast aqmd plans • The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) is required to identify ways to improve regional air quality in the Los Angeles/Orange County area • The agency regularly prepares a regional Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) that deals with specific pollutants in specific geographic locales Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • The South Coast AQMD has regulatory authority over air pollution created by vehicles and industries in the Anaheim Canyon area ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.22 recent state and federal plans and regulations • Global Warming (AB 32) • Sustainable Communities (SB 375) • Federal and State Stormwater Requirements • Urban Water Conservation (SB x7-7) • Complete Streets (AB 1358) • Green Building Standards • Enterprise Zone ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.23 global warming (AB 32) • Requires the State to adopt regulations to achieve 1990 equivalent statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels by 2020 • In turn, local governments (including the City of Anaheim) must show how they are achieve GHG reduction standards through land use decisions, including the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan • This law requires California Air Resources Board (CARB) to adopt regulations requiring GHG emission sources to monitor and report their emissions, and specifies detailed criteria for the adoption and compliance with those regulations ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.24 global warming (AB 32) Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • The law includes Smart Growth Principles that should be included in new land use plans, including: – Encouraging mixed-use and transit-oriented development – Expanding pedestrian and bicycle corridors – Creating a job/housing balance – Creating incentives for developments that have flexible development standards, shared parking arrangements, and density bonuses for affordable housing and live/work – Reducing vehicle trips through land use and urban design (City is currently creating a database to analyze how development patterns and green building techniques affect emissions) – Requiring CEQA greenhouse gas emissions analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.25 sustainable communities (SB 375) • An implementation of AB 32, SB 375 requires regional agencies (MPOs) to show how regional land use, housing, and transportation planning reduces GHG emissions • The law requires all MPOs to update their Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) and prepare regional housing needs allocations (RHNA) that result in development patterns and supporting transportation networks which reduce GHG emissions from cars and light trucks • It also requires MPOs to prepare land use and transportation planning strategies that reduce GHG emissions, which are to be incorporated as an additional element of its RTP ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.26 sustainable communities (SB 375) • A major focus of the law is to achieve regional sustainability – Requires regional agencies to prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) in conjunction with Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) – SCAG has drafted a SCS in December 2011 with these primary goals: – Better placemaking (i.e. Smart Growth) – Lower cost to taxpayers and families – increased density for decreased infrastructure costs – Benefits to public health and the environment – Greater responsiveness to demographics and the changing housing market – Improved access and mobility ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.27 sustainable communities (SB 375) • A sustainable communities strategy (SCS) is effectively a blueprint- like set of planning assumptions that helps reduce GHG emissions from cars and light trucks • The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is in the process of developing an SCS, which should be adopted in Spring 2012, that: – Identifies the general location of uses, residential densities, and building intensities within the region – Describes how the development pattern and transportation network can work together to feasibly reduce GHG emissions from automobiles and light trucks consistent with the reduction targets allocated by CARB Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • Development projects that are consistent with the SCS are eligible for CEQA streamlining ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.28 federal and state stormwater requirements • As required by the Clean Water Act, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program controls water pollution by regulating discharges of pollutants into waters of the State Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • Virtually all commercial and industrial sites must implement standard "Best Management Practices" (BMPs) on-site to reduce discharge of pollutants to the storm drain system • Certain industrial facilities must obtain permits from the Santa Ana Region Water Quality Control Board • Redeveloped sites must implement structural treatment controls for stormwater runoff for the operational phase of a project ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.29 urban water conservation (SB x7-7) • This law mandates water conservation targets and efficiency improvements for urban water suppliers • The Statewide urban water reduction target is 10% by 2015 and 20% by 2020 Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • Development projects within Anaheim Canyon will be subject to new water conservation and efficiency policies and standards ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.30 complete streets (AB 1375) • Enacted in 2011, this law requires local jurisdictions, upon any substantive revision to their circulation elements, to plan for a balanced multi-modal transportation network • This includes meeting the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways, including motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial goods, and users of public transportation Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • The City’s existing General Plan includes policies related to complete streets, even though it was adopted prior to this law • The specific plan update process will identify specific ways for creating more complete streets within Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.31 green building standards code • The State Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code) is part of the State Building Code (Part 11) • The purpose of the code is to improve public health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices in the following categories: – Planning and design – Energy efficiency – Water efficiency and conservation – Material conservation and resource efficiency – Environmental quality ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.32 green building standards Relationship to Anaheim Canyon • The code applies to the planning, design, operation, construction, use and occupancy of every newly constructed building or structure • It creates minimum standards for energy efficiency construction, materials, and systems ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.33 enterprise zone • The City received an Enterprise Zone designation from the State effective February 1, 2012 • The Enterprise Zone boundaries include nearly all of the City’s industrial and commercial areas (80% of all businesses), including all of Anaheim Canyon • The program serves to stimulate economic growth by providing tax credits for businesses located within the Enterprise Zone boundaries ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.34 enterprise zone ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.35 enterprise zone • Benefits of this program include the following: – Firms can earn up to $37,440 in state tax credits for each qualified employee hired – Corporations can earn sales tax credits on purchases of up to $20 million per year of qualified machinery and machinery parts – Up-front expensing of certain depreciable property – Lenders to Zone businesses may receive a net interest deduction – Unused tax credits can be applied to future tax years, stretching out the benefit of the initial investment – Enterprise Zone companies can earn preference points on state contracts – Up to 100% Net Operating Loss (NOL) carry-forward (NOL may be carried forward 15 years) ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.36 regulatory setting findings and opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.37 regulatory setting summary • There are many existing federal, state and local regulations that will affect the development of the updated Anaheim Canyon specific plan • The updated specific plan will generally cover the same geography as two existing specific plans, with the addition of certain adjacent areas. • The updated specific plan will need to be consistent with the City’s existing and adopted General Plan • Major recent changes to state law now focus on greenhouse gas reduction and sustainability, most notably AB 32 and SB 375, and require their consideration in local planning regulations • New development and significant redevelopment are required to reuse stormwater that falls on these sites (infiltration is considered reuse, and the Canyon area is the best location in Orange County for this to occur) ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.38 • The regional Compass Blueprint project developed by SCAG is a voluntary guidance document • The South Coast AQMD has regulatory authority over air pollution created by vehicles and industries in the Anaheim Canyon area • The Regional Transportation Plan developed by SCAG focuses regional investment/reinvestment on major roadways, in particular Freeways, which will have an direct impact on Anaheim Canyon regulatory setting findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.39 • Development projects that are consistent with the Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) are eligible for CEQA streamlining • The State requires Complete Street policies, which are already included in the City’s existing General Plan prior to adoption of the law • The Anaheim Canyon specific plan update process will identify specific ways for creating more complete streets within Anaheim Canyon • The State’s recent CalGreen code applies to the planning, design, operation, construction, use and occupancy of newly constructed residential (homes, motels, hotels and apartments under three stories) and non-residential buildings and structures, and creates minimum standards for energy efficiency construction, materials and systems regulatory setting findings ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.40 • The City and the community have the opportunity to create an updated specific plan for Anaheim Canyon that streamlines regulations and encourages economic development and revitalization • The updated specific plan can clearly articulate how the City of Anaheim is addressing recent state greenhouse gas and sustainability mandates, and in turn help streamline approvals of future projects that are consistent with the plan regulatory setting opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- a n a h e i m c a n y o n s p e c i f i c p l a n I r e v i s e d p u b l i c d r a f t I m a y 2 0 1 5 I 1 appendix e: industrial park amenities survey and analysis E- ---PAGE BREAK--- A New Class for Industrial Parks An analysis of amenities for revitalizing and greening an aging business park in Anaheim, CA Suzanne Schwab Professional Report Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the Master of Urban and Regional Planning Department of Planning, Policy, and Design University of California, Irvine Client: Jonathan Borrego, Principal Planner and Susan Kim, Senior Planner City of Anaheim, Planning Department PR Faculty Advisor: Ajay Garde Spring 2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Objectives 2 Audience 3 Problem Statement and Background 3-4 Significance 4-6 Methods and Procedures 6 Existing Conditions 6 Case Study Evaluations 6 Survey 6 Industrial Office Park Trends 7-11 A New Class of 7 Eco-Industrial Parks and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design 8-9 Additional Literature 10-11 SWOT Analysis of Existing Conditions 11-14 11-12 Weaknesses 12-13 Opportunities 13-14 Threats 14 Case Study Evaluations 14-18 NASA Ames and Google 14-16 Irvine Spectrum 16-18 Survey Results 18-21 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Data Collection Methods 18 Survey Population 18 Survey Findings 18-21 Planning Recommendations 21-24 Conclusion 24 Appendices Appendix A Current Land Use Map for the Northeast Area Specific Plan Appendix B Evaluation Criteria for Case Studies Appendix C Amenities Survey Questionnaire Canvasing Card Survey Data Handwritten Responses Appendix D Canyon Point Amenities Brochure Appendix E Eco-Industrial Parks in the United States References ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Figures Figure 1 Photo: Boeing Site in Anaheim Canyon 1 Figure 2 Map: Anaheim Canyon Planning Area 2 Figure 3 Photos: Signage Program 4 Figure 4 Map: PacifiCenter Specific Plan Boundary Map 5 Figure 5 Photos: Hercules Campus at Playa Vista 7 Figure 6 Resource Recovery Based Eco-Industrial Park 9 Figure 7 Photo: Canyon Point LEED Certified Industrial Complex 11 Figure 8 Eastside Church Rendering of Plaza 11 Figure 9 Aerial Map of Anaheim Metrolink Station and Surrounding Area 12 Figure 10 Lack of Connectivity 12 Figure 11 Anaheim Lakes 13 Figure 12 Gateways 14 Figure 13 Googleplex 14 Figure 14 Google Amenities 15 Figure 15 Aerial Map of Irvine Spectrum 16 Figure 16 Photos: Irvine Spectrum 17 Figure 17 Chart: Satisfaction with Current Amenities 19 Figure 18 Chart: Types of Amenities 20 Figure 19 Chart: Dinner in Anaheim Canyon 21 Figure 20 Metrolink Schematic Plan for Pedestrian Connectivity 22 Figure 21 Street Improvements: Bulbouts 22 Figure 22 Photo: The Gates Central Park 24 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 1 A New Class for Industrial Parks ExecuƟve Summary Anaheim Canyon is an industrial park in Anaheim, California covering approximately 2,500 acres of land. The aerospace industry helped to establish Anaheim Canyon as a premier manufacturing center when North American AviaƟon (later bought by Boeing) purchased an 80 acre lot in 1959. Through several cycles of economic ups and downs this business center has maintained a presence in Southern California. Today’s industrial park is vastly diﬀerent than that of the 1960’s. Anaheim Canyon is home to 34% of the City’s businesses and 32% of the City’s job base. With the addiƟon of a Metrolink staƟon, a variety of available natural resources, and adjacent residenƟal neighborhoods this area has the potenƟal to be more than just a place of employment. The objecƟve of this report is to aid the City of Anaheim in making decisions regarding the inclusion of ameniƟes within the new Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁc Plan. Challenging economic condiƟons make this a good Ɵme to revise the Speciﬁc Plans for this area and to rethink the ameniƟes provided in this industrial/oﬃce park. The previous Speciﬁc Plans and revitalizaƟon eﬀorts are no longer compeƟƟve in addressing issues of mobility, connecƟvity and adding convenience and service uses. This report analyzes data found through research, site visits, a survey, and case studies. A weaknesses, opportuniƟes, and threats (SWOT) analysis of exisƟng condiƟons is also presented. RecommendaƟons address issues in ﬁve areas: BeauƟﬁcaƟon, Mobility & ConnecƟvity, Land Use, Economic Development and Community Involvement. Figure 1 Boeing site in Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 2 A New Class for Industrial Parks IntroducƟon Anaheim Canyon has the opportunity to improve its image and compeƟƟveness of the area by capitalizing on three contemporary concepts: sustainable development (encouraging LEED and “green” principles as well as economic stability), the “creaƟve class” work force, and the popularity of mixed use development. Much like oﬃce space is rated on an A, B, and C class basis, a combinaƟon of these ideas could help to launch this area into a new “class” of business parks. Upgrading the ameniƟes of Anaheim Canyon will help this aging industrial area to become the vibrant business center it once was by retaining current tenants and aƩracƟng new “classes” of buildings, companies, workers, and mix of entertainment, recreaƟon, retail and residenƟal uses. ObjecƟves This report supports the creaƟon of a new Speciﬁc Plan by providing a summary of ameniƟes oﬀered in industrial parks, the results of a survey of people who currently use Anaheim Canyon, and recommendaƟons for ameniƟes and uses to be encouraged in the new Speciﬁc Plan. RecommendaƟons are made for ameniƟes that will improve Anaheim Canyon’s compeƟƟveness, increase use of the area during non‐business hours, and explore ways to use exisƟng environmental ameniƟes to enhance the City’s green iniƟaƟves This report explores answers to the following quesƟons: How can this planning area beƩer meet the needs of the businesses and their employees as well as nearby residents and the community at large? What ameniƟes will help to propel use of Anaheim Canyon beyond an industrial park? What exisƟng ameniƟes can be capitalized on to encourage acƟvity during non‐ business hours? How can new and improved ameniƟes add value to this area while promoƟng sustainable principles? Figure 2 Map of Anaheim Canyon Planning Area ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 3 A New Class for Industrial Parks Audience This report has been prepared for the City of Anaheim and MIG (planning consultant for the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁc Plan update). It may also be useful for developers and real estate agents interested in property in Anaheim Canyon. AddiƟonally, people interested in the revitalizaƟon of industrial parks may ﬁnd it informaƟve. Problem Statement and Background Given the economic condiƟons of the past several years this industrial park, like many others, is starƟng to show signs of age and loss of tenants. A 2010 survey of local commercial real estate brokers and property owners revealed that the appearance of the area coupled with the lack of ameniƟes has made it diﬃcult to sell and lease property (Chamber of Commerce, City of Anaheim). This established business center is almost 40 years old and near build out, however, a few newer developments oﬀer signs of promise. The recent addiƟon of a new Kaiser Permanente Hospital campus with a LEED Silver parking structure and the 6.3 acre LEED cerƟﬁed Canyon Point industrial complex have introduced this business center to the next era of smart, green development. To conƟnue encouraging more posiƟve “green” growth the City applied for and was awarded the Strategic Growth Council’s Sustainable CommuniƟes Planning Grant to create a new Speciﬁc Plan. The Anaheim Planning department is working with MIG and their team of sub‐consultants on a new plan to replace the exisƟng Northeast Area Speciﬁc Plan (1995) and the PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan (1989). As previously menƟoned, this planning area is not uƟlized outside of “normal business hours.” The land use mix is heavily focused on Industrial and Oﬃce uses. An opportunity for added economic diversity exists. The adjacency of the Santa Ana River Trail, nearby residenƟal neighborhoods, and a new mixed use development, The Crossings (also a LEED Silver building) within Anaheim Canyon, provides an addiƟonal customer base for service and commercial uses. Previous RevitalizaƟon AƩempts The Anaheim Redevelopment Agency tried to revive and unify this business park in 2008. An oﬃcial sign program was developed to create a sense of place and idenƟty. The signs and banners are located throughout Anaheim Canyon, primarily on major arterial road entrances and intersecƟons. Today the signs and light pole banners are worn and faded (see Figure 3 on page In 2010 The City of Anaheim Economic Development Department formed an Advisory Group for Anaheim Canyon. This group is comprised of property owners, business owners, brokers, and other stakeholders. They are part of the Economic Development Strategy AcƟon Plan for Anaheim Canyon. The AcƟon Plan highlights six guiding principles: Create an environment where businesses can quickly adapt to changing condiƟons. Collaborate with private stakeholders in developing new programs and policies. Concentrate eﬀorts on the core area near the train staƟon. Do not increase costs for businesses or property owners. Build on The Canyon’s exisƟng and successes. Compete eﬀecƟvely against newer, less expensive areas (Vander Dussen, 2010). ImplementaƟon of the AcƟon Plan is a joint eﬀort ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 4 A New Class for Industrial Parks by several City departments. The Advisory Group is an acƟve and vital part of the new Speciﬁc Plan process. This group is also an important contributor to the research and recommendaƟons in this report. Signiﬁcance The current Speciﬁc Plan that provides the framework for development of the majority of the planning area, the Northeast Area Speciﬁc Plan, is 20 years old. It was assembled by IBI Group and oﬀers background informaƟon as well as technical zoning and planning policies. The intent of this document has always been to promote economic development and to protect and maintain this area as a business hub for Anaheim and Orange County. Issues of connecƟvity and walkability were presented in the current Speciﬁc Plan; however they were never fully addressed or implemented. The Northeast Area Speciﬁc Plan provides open space in Development Area 6. On the Land Use Map (see Appendix A) this Development Area includes the land around the Orange County Water District’s (OCWD) retenƟon basins and along a small porƟon of the Santa Ana River Trail near the 91 freeway. These pockets of open space are not accessible for users of Anaheim Canyon due to OCWD liability restricƟons. Expanded availability to open space as an amenity is further explored in this report. A second Speciﬁc Plan, the PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan No. 88—3, guides development within approximately 26 acres of land closest to the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink StaƟon. This Speciﬁc Plan was prepared by Planning Company Associates. It was adopted in 1989 and was last amended in 2004. This area is guided by its own Speciﬁc Plan, however, it is physically contained within the boundaries of the Northeast Area Speciﬁc Plan menƟoned above. PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan encourages mixed use Figure 3 Signage Program ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 5 A New Class for Industrial Parks development. Approved uses within this planning area include oﬃce, restaurant, hotel, and retail. The plan provides design direcƟon to achieve a high quality uniﬁed look at this “gateway” to Anaheim Canyon. As Figure 4 shows this planning area is bordered by major entry points including the 91 freeway, TusƟn Avenue, La Palma Avenue and the Metrolink train tracks. It also houses Anaheim Canyon Metrolink StaƟon. Due to current economic condiƟons this area has not fully achieved the goals set out in the current Speciﬁc Plan. Empty store fronts, buildings, and underuƟlized space plague this potenƟally vibrant place of commerce. This report also explores encouraging more restaurant and retail uses as ameniƟes in this area (as well as other part of Anaheim Canyon). The Northeast Area Speciﬁc Plan and PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan will be replaced by the new Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁc Plan. Another important plan to consider is the Anaheim Canyon StaƟon Master Site Plan also created by IBI Group. This document was completed and approved by the City in 2007. It describes the plan for connecƟvity with the local Metrolink StaƟon to the rest of Anaheim Canyon. The biggest area of opportunity for this site plan is a pedestrian walkway from the train staƟon to the new Kaiser Permanente facility and The Crossings apartment complex. Through the recent acquisiƟon of addiƟonal property this plan is one step closer to reality. Mobility and connecƟvity opportuniƟes are included as amenity opƟons in this report. In 2010, The Anaheim Chamber of Commerce conducted a focus group on Anaheim Canyon. In 2011, they followed it up with a Real Estate Broker’s survey and an addiƟonal Focus Group session. The ﬁndings from the focus groups and survey are insighƞul and helped to solidify the City’s decision to move forward with pursuing a new Speciﬁc Plan for this area. The iniƟal focus group consisted of 4 groups, 20 parƟcipants total. The group covered: business trends, Anaheim Canyon Value ProposiƟon, image, suggested improvements, experience doing business with the City, and value added services. The image secƟon of this document provides valuable informaƟon in that it reveals that the area is seen as “eclecƟc‐ a mix of diﬀerent types of structures and businesses. It is pracƟcal, uƟlitarian not parƟcularly beauƟful, but nice” (Anaheim Chamber of Commerce & Agency 51, Anaheim Canyon Focus Group Trends Summary, 2010). The group speciﬁcally asked for “beƩer lights, more pleasing landscaping, walking trails, and outdoor places for work breaks‐ more of a campus‐like feeling.” When it came to ameniƟes the group suggested a “retail core center” and oﬀered El Toro Blvd in Lake Forest as an example (Anaheim Chamber of Commerce & Agency 51, Anaheim Canyon Focus Group Trends Summary, 2010). The 2011 Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Broker’s survey focuses more on costs of real estate and doing business in Anaheim but also oﬀers a few ideas for ameniƟes and beauƟﬁcaƟon. In quesƟon 5, “How do you think the City should invest In The Canyon?” the survey Figure 4 PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan boundaries ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 6 A New Class for Industrial Parks revealed that providing more ameniƟes, restaurants, shuƩle service from the train staƟon was listed fourth behind business assistance, permit help, relaxed regulaƟons, and redevelopment (Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, 2011 Anaheim Brokers Survey Findings, 2011). Methods and Procedures The new Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁc Plan gives the City the opportunity to create a sustainable economic development plan that will help this area to reemerge as a premier business center. Conveniences like connecƟvity, walking paths, bike trails, and sidewalks as well as proximity to shopping and dining are considered. Research methods include: Weaknesses, OpportuniƟes and Threats (SWOT) analysis of exisƟng condiƟons in Anaheim Canyon; An analysis of case studies: 1. NASA Ames Research Center and Google partnership in Mountain View, California 2. Irvine Spectrum Retail and Oﬃce Park in Irvine, California; and survey of people who use the area. ExisƟng CondiƟons: Weaknesses, OpportuniƟes, and Threats Analysis InformaƟon on exisƟng condiƟons was collected through site visits and web searches of newspaper arƟcles and real estate broker sites. Photographs taken during site visits to Anaheim Canyon are provided to document the condiƟons described. See the Weaknesses, OpportuniƟes, and Threats Analysis secƟon. Case Study EvaluaƟons As previously menƟoned the NASA/Google Ames Research Facility and Irvine Spectrum are used as examples of what types of ameniƟes work and don’t work in large business park areas. In evaluaƟng the case studies, NASA/Google Ames Research Facility and Irvine Spectrum, informaƟon was obtained from the internet and site maps for comparison purposes. It was possible to conduct a site visit to Irvine Spectrum due to its close proximity. See the Case Study EvaluaƟon secƟon and refer to Appendix B for an evaluaƟon sheet used for each case study. Exploratory Survey The survey speciﬁcally asks about the types of ameniƟes that businesses, residents, and property owners think would beneﬁt Anaheim Canyon. It was created using Survey Monkey. The survey was distributed to the Anaheim Canyon Advisory group via e‐mail. It was distributed at a community workshop and was made available to the public through the Anaheim Canyon website www.anaheim.com/ anaheimcanyon. All responses were anonymous. The Advisory Group is comprised of 30 members. Of the members 18 are local business owners and operators, developers, or real estate brokers. The remaining 12 members are City of Anaheim employees from mulƟple departments including Planning, Community Development, UƟliƟes, Public Works, and Community Services. The survey was sent to the 18 non‐city employees. Surveys were distributed at the community workshop on February 15, 2012. The survey was also promoted throughout Anaheim Canyon by canvassing the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink StaƟon and a popular restaurant venue during peak hours. A copy of the survey, results, and canvassing card are available in Appendix C. The results of the survey are discussed in the Survey Results secƟon. ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 7 A New Class for Industrial Parks Overview of Industrial & Oﬃce Park Trends A New “Class” of Worker: Designing a Place with the CreaƟve Class in Mind The City will need to rethink the everyday user of Anaheim Canyon. Richard Florida introduced this new workforce in his book, The Rise of the New CreaƟve Class. Florida deﬁnes the CreaƟve Class to include “people in science and engineering, architecture and design, educaƟon, arts, music and entertainment, whose economic funcƟon is to create new ideas, new technology and/or new creaƟve content” (Florida, 2002, p. The CreaƟve Class sees their work space, work place, recreaƟon, home life, etc. diﬀerently than the predominant service class or managerial class of the past. Outdoor ameniƟes are parƟcularly appealing for this social class. Focus groups of “CreaƟves” conducted by Florida revealed that they “value acƟve outdoor recreaƟon very highly, that they are drawn to places and communiƟes where many outdoor acƟviƟes are prevalent” (Florida, 2002, p. 173). These outdoor acƟviƟes include “bicycling, jogging and kayaking to trail running and snowboarding” (Florida, 2002, p. 173). Urban Land Magazine has covered recent trends of the CreaƟve Class. In “Redeﬁning CreaƟve Space” Patricia Kirk explores the reuse of old buildings by digital and entertainment companies (2011). The majority of her examples are just north of Orange County in Los Angeles. Kirk interviewed Wayne Ratkovich, president and CEO of the Ratkovich Company. His company owns the Hercules Campus, a 28.2 acre property (see Figure 5) that caters to creaƟve companies through ”architecturally interesƟng buildings, a locaƟon near the beach and airport, and access to recreaƟonal and retail ameniƟes at Playa Vista” (Kirk, 2011, p. 59). During the interview Ratkovich deﬁned this concept of the workplace as a lifestyle using the phrase “Google eﬀect” (Kirk, 2011, p. 60) He further noted, “They [the CreaƟve Class] want to know if the wireless is hot outside and if there are picnic tables, a dog park nearby, and recreaƟon” (Kirk, 2011, p. 60). Figure 5 Hercules Campus at Playa Vista, ameniƟes include a sand volley ball court and a manicured running trail Source: www.herculescampus.com ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 8 A New Class for Industrial Parks Anaheim Canyon is already home to two creaƟve type companies, PacSun and Fisker AutomoƟve. PacSun is a retailer oﬀering surf brand adult and teen clothing in malls naƟonwide. The company website describes their work culture as “a dynamic organizaƟon where trust, creaƟvity, individual excellence, teamwork and winning are the values that shape our success.” Fisker, a luxury car maker manufactures a premium hybrid electric vehicle also describes the essence of the CreaƟve Class in the descripƟon of their headquarters: Our facility reﬂects the company's philosophy for sustainability. The recycled ﬂooring, animal cruelty‐free furniture, solar‐powered signage, use of compact ﬂuorescent light bulbs and ongoing recycling eﬀorts keeps every team member and associate fully engaged in this core company mission (ﬁskerautomoƟve.com). Eco‐Industrial Parks and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Eco‐Industrial Parks (EIPs) were fostered in the United States by the President’s Council for Sustainable Development in 1996 during the Clinton AdministraƟon. There are many deﬁniƟons for Eco‐Industrial Parks, two versions provided by Cote and Cohen‐Rosenthal (1998) and used by the President’s Council to deﬁne Eco ‐Industrial Parks are as follows: 1. A community of businesses that cooperate with each other and with the local community to efﬁciently share resources informaƟon, materials, water, energy, infrastructure and natural habitat), leading to economic and environmental quality gains, and equitable enhancement of human resources for the business and local community. And 2. An industrial system of planned materials and energy exchanges that seeks to minimize energy and raw materials use, minimize waste, and build sustainable economic, ecological and social relaƟonships. ConsulƟng ﬁrm Indigo Development provides several beneﬁts for using EIPs: Business derives cost savings and new revenues; shared services; reduced regulatory burden; and increased compeƟƟveness. The community enjoys a cleaner, healthier environment; business and job development; an aƩracƟon for recruitment; and an end to conﬂict between the economy and the environment. Government receives increased tax revenues; reduced enforcement burden; reduced costs of environmental and health damage; and reduced demand on municipal infrastructure. For the environment there is reduced demand on ﬁnite resources; decreased local and global polluƟon; increased use of renewable energy and materials; and an overall renewal of natural systems (Indigo Development, 2006). EIPs can support sustainable growth. There are a number of ways that this type of ecosystem can work. The most immediate applicaƟon lies in the creaƟon or retroﬁƫng of industrial zones where waste or by‐products of one company are used as resources by another company (Erkman, 1997). Another approach is to create industrial clusters around power plants, mills, etc. where other smaller companies would greatly beneﬁt from materials ﬂows and producƟon wastes of the larger facility. A resource recovery facility, shown in Figure 6, would facilitate the exchange of materials and waste. ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 9 A New Class for Industrial Parks The City could oﬀer a framework for private businesses to foster the implementaƟon of eco‐ industrial principles in Anaheim Canyon. The City already promotes a number of “green” iniƟaƟves through the Green ConnecƟon, integraƟng sustainable principles into public uƟliƟes and their green building program (www.anaheim.net/ secƟon.asp?id=162 Fostering a collaboraƟon between businesses would be the next step toward creaƟon of eco‐industrial projects. See Appendix E for a chart of EIPs in the United States. One cauƟon when planning Eco‐Industrial Park projects is not to get caught up in trying to mimic nature. Erkman provides further insight “in the industrial ecology perspecƟve, we should certainly get inspiraƟon from the biosphere, and design human structures compaƟble with its normal funcƟoning, but this may not necessarily mean designing structures and objects with organic shapes, or using only natural materials” (1997). Eco‐Industrial Parks focus on the ecosystem process not necessarily architectural details. On the other hand Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) provides guidelines for individual buildings. These guidelines include a framework for green building design, construcƟon, operaƟons, and maintenance (www.usgbc.com). Anaheim Canyon already has a number of LEED cerƟﬁed buildings that are discussed in the Analysis of ExisƟng CondiƟons secƟon. Anaheim Center for New Energy Technologies (AC‐NET) is a citywide program that promotes a variety of green projects. AC‐NET is a partnership between the City of Anaheim and California State University Fullerton (CSUF). Formed in 2008 AC‐ NET supports the development of clean technology companies in Anaheim through an annual business plan compeƟƟon, pilot projects, and faculty research projects (www.acnet‐ anaheim.net/about‐acnet). Current research areas include energy sustainability and eﬃciency. Several pilot projects for water and energy conservaƟon are underway throughout the City. Anaheim Canyon is a prime locaƟon for test projects and research faciliƟes. Figure 6 Resource Recovery is one model for an EIP, green arrows represent outgoing converted waste while blue arrows represent incoming reusable waste collected by the Resource Recovery Facility and then redistributed, oŌenƟmes the waste is converted to energy represented by a light bulb on this graphic Source: www.energy answers.com ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 10 A New Class for Industrial Parks AddiƟonal Literature The book Retroﬁƫng Suburbia, prsents several case studies. The authors introduce an early example of retroﬁƫng industrial parks in the U.S. with the case of Stanford Industrial Park. This industrial park was built in 1951 in Palo Alto, California and was later renamed Stanford Research Park. To aƩract the CreaƟve Class “it was designed like a university campus with parking behind the buildings and requirements for tenants for 60% of the lot to be open space (Dunham‐Jones & Williamson, 2009, p. 204). Buildings with open ﬂoorplans oﬀered new, leaner “plug and play” concept spaces which seem to be more desirable for creaƟve companies and their employees. The addiƟon of non‐industrial uses will need to be addressed for Anaheim Canyon and thought will have to go into the placement of these uses in proximity to the residents or employees they serve. RecommendaƟons are presented in the arƟcle, The applicaƟon of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of Eco‐Industrial Parks: An Australian case study, from the Journal of Cleaner ProducƟon. This internaƟonal perspecƟve looks at synergisƟc relaƟonships and how to best capitalize on them. By placing businesses near one another where one or both can beneﬁt from the waste, distribuƟon, etc. of the other (similar to Eco‐Industrial Parks but not wholly focused on industrial uses) creates dynamic business parks that are eco‐friendly (Roberts, 2004). This concept is useful for this professional report when analyzing how to arrange the uses so that everyone beneﬁts (where do the ameniƟes ﬁt relaƟve to the industrial uses?). The Urban Land InsƟtute’s book Business Park and Industrial Development Handbook oﬀers more about the importance of ameniƟes like landscaping, the popularity of a campus‐like oﬃce park seƫng, and insight on how to revive older oﬃce parks. Landscaping is an easy and cost eﬀecƟve way to improve the image of an area and its marketability (Frej et al, 2001). Frej, et al (2001) also provide criteria for landscaping through a Speciﬁc Plan and/or design guidelines: Specialized landscape treatments for diﬀerent types of streets in a park (parkways, secondary streets, and service roads); Speciﬁc types of plants; Percent of lot to be landscaped; Designated landscape zones (interior and exterior property lines, foundaƟon areas, streetscapes, and rear yards); Minimum plant sizes and tree diameters; IrrigaƟon systems; Grading and berming standards; and Parking lot conﬁguraƟons. Using naƟve plants, Low Impact Development (LID) principles, and other sustainable opƟons will help to beauƟfy the area in a “green” way. It is also important to look at the cultural context of a site, taking into consideraƟon the architectural character and social structure of the environment. As far as ameniƟes go the authors recommend taking a “modern approach to site development that favors an acƟve landscape in a campus environment” (Frej et al, 2001, p. 121). Outdoor recreaƟon areas can also help to enhance the image of an industrial or business park. Including popular recreaƟonal faciliƟes like nature trails, basketball courts, informal gathering areas, and places for quiet contemplaƟon can add value and increase the percepƟon of the area (Frej et al, 2001, p. 122). “With more companies increasingly aware of being perceived as good corporate ciƟzens, a trend is growing toward making outdoor faciliƟes available to the local community” (Frej et al, 2001, p. 122). ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 11 A New Class for Industrial Parks Encouraging private development to provide more public spaces will greatly beneﬁt Anaheim Canyon. An example of this is discussed in the secƟon with regards to Eastside Church. When looking at aging business parks this book suggests that some reverse engineering may need to take place, modifying the exisƟng internal road networks, upgrading exisƟng streets to current standards, and realigning or removing streets to accommodate new uses may also need to be considered (Frej et al, 2001, p. 143). The authors also note that parking demands may have changed over the years. SoluƟons oﬀered include shared parking, organized van and car pools, access to transit, and shuƩles connecƟng acƟviƟes inside and outside the park (2001, p. 143). Another suggesƟon for improving the overall image and ﬁrst impression of the area is to remove or modify “industrial” looking buildings along the frontages [or gateways], they should be replaced by upscale buildings to present a stronger image. This will help to beƩer posiƟon the business park for a new market (Frej et al, 2001, p. 144). Analysis of ExisƟng CondiƟons: Weaknesses, OpportuniƟes, and Threats A lack of ameniƟes is a common problem among industrial parks. Planners value open outdoor space more today than they have in previous decades; retroﬁƫng exisƟng spaces to accommodate this new aƫtude can be diﬃcult (Dunham‐Jones & Williamson, 2009). Planners today are concerned with preserving open space for a variety of reasons including protecƟng the environment, an increased focus on sustainability, and as an amenity that people can use for recreaƟon. Anaheim Canyon, like any area, has its weaknesses, opportuniƟes and threats. ExisƟng Environment, New Development with LEED Standards, and Unique Companies New development has helped to encourage sustainable principles within Anaheim Canyon. The addiƟon of LEED cerƟﬁed building has brought new life to a few parcels within this industrial park. Sares Regis completed Canyon Point Business Complex in 2010 and 2 of the 3 buildings have been sold to date. This developer along with their real estate broker CBRE, have put together an ameniƟes brochure complete with map to help with the markeƟng of this site (see Appendix AddiƟonally, there are a few new uses that have surfaced in Anaheim Canyon. Eastside ChrisƟan Church bought part of the former Boeing Figure 7 Canyon Point LEED cerƟﬁed building at 1290 North Miller Street Source: SaresRegis.com Figure 8 Rendering of Eastside Church Plaza Source: Eastside.com ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 12 A New Class for Industrial Parks property in May of 2011. The church will be relocaƟng their headquarters from a 7.5 acre campus in Fullerton to 20 acres in Anaheim Canyon. Plans for the new campus include use of two exisƟng buildings, a new 6 story building to be leased for oﬃce and restaurant uses, as well as a large outdoor plaza and garden (Carpenter, 2011). The Oﬃce is a new, local gym that boasts that they are the place “where athletes come to work” (TheOﬃceSports.com). This 45,000 square foot sports complex features 9 baƫng cages, a 40 yard turf football area, and a plethora of other unique training faciliƟes. Not far from the Oﬃce is Chance Theater. Chance describes itself as a contemporary live performance stage featuring mostly plays and musicals (ChanceTheater.com). Weaknesses: Lack of ConnecƟvity, Aging Buildings, and LiƩle Variety in Land Uses ConnecƟvity is a major issue for this area. Without a car this business park is extremely diﬃcult to navigate. Although it oﬀers a Metrolink StaƟon and adjacent Santa Ana River Trails for pedestrians and bicyclist these ameniƟes are not connected to the rest of the business park. As the picture above shows there is liƩle to no connecƟvity to or from the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink StaƟon. The Crossings apartment complex to the west of the staƟon has no access to the train, although, it is literally right next to the tracks. Figure 10 IntersecƟon of East La Palma Avenue and Fee Ana Street, a lack of sidewalks, connecƟons to bus stops, and bike lanes are common within Anaheim Canyon Figure 9 Google Earth map of Anaheim Canyon Metrolink StaƟon and surrounding area ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 13 A New Class for Industrial Parks Much of the physical environment lacks sidewalks and designated bike lanes. Employees are not able to safely walk to take a break or to get lunch. AddiƟonally, there is a lack of restaurant opƟons for employee and client lunches or dinners. Restaurant, retail, and service based land uses are scarce. This 40 year old area is showing its age, with the excepƟon of a few new buildings as highlighted in the secƟon above, the majority of the exisƟng building stock is old and outdated. This could be a major deterrent for aƩracƟng new businesses to the area. Perhaps current and potenƟal businesses could do with older building stock if the conveniences of ameniƟes and right incenƟves outweighed the cost of making improvements to the buildings. OpportuniƟes: Capitalizing on the Local Landscape, ExisƟng Uses, and CreaƟon of an Entertainment Zone(s) The Orange County Water District owns several water retenƟon lakes in the area, however, only one of them is open to the public and leased by a ﬁshing company that stocks and maintains the lake. Unfortunately due to liability and the primary use of the retenƟon ponds by the Orange County Water District they cannot be opened up for public use. However, the ponds could beneﬁt the area through beauƟﬁcaƟon eﬀorts. Adding landscaping to each of the areas will help to increase the image of Anaheim Canyon. Another opportunity exists in expanding on current entertainment uses. Camelot Golﬂand is a family friendly recreaƟon center oﬀering puƩ puƩ, laser joust, and an arcade, as well as an outdoor waterpark and pizza place. Although visible from the 91 freeway and adjacent to Concourse Bowling Alley, this entertainment area is hard to ﬁnd and the two buildings are an island among so many non‐commercial businesses. There are also two idenƟﬁable gateways into Anaheim Canyon. The ﬁrst is centrally located with access to the 91 freeway and TusƟn Avenue. This gateway currently resides in the PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan area. It contains the Metrolink StaƟon and is adjacent to The Crossings apartment community. This area has several service uses including fast food, dry cleaners, banking and light retail. The second gateway is located on the east side of Anaheim Canyon with access to the 90 (Imperial Highway) and East La Palma Avenue. This area is not within the current Speciﬁc Plan. However, it is being considered for inclusion in the updated plan. This side of East La Palma Avenue is home Figure 11 Anaheim Lakes are circled in blue, a close‐up of one of the “Lakes,” this one is open to the public for ﬁshing ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 14 A New Class for Industrial Parks to a movie theater, service, and retail, as well as restaurants. There is median signage at the gateway entrance on TusƟn Avenue and on East La Palma Avenue. Threats: Less Expensive and Perceived High‐End Business Parks Other business parks in Orange County and the Inland Empire pose as threats to Anaheim Canyon. Orange County is home to several high‐ end business parks such as, Irvine Spectrum, South Coast Metro, and the El Toro & Alton areas of Lake Forest. These are highly compeƟƟve areas with the added value of close proximity to the 5 and 405 freeways. With the downturn in the economy many businesses have looked to the Inland Empire. Sketchers built a new shoe distribuƟon center in Moreno Valley. The building is the largest LEED cerƟﬁed building in the United States (Monroe, 2011). This building is seƫng the standard for the brand new 1.8 million square foot Highland Fairview Corporate Park (Dorich, 2010). Case Study EvaluaƟons Ames Research Center The partnership between Google and NASA at the Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California oﬀers a great example of an innovaƟve, technology based, green campus‐like business park. Google signed a 40 year lease for 42.2 acres on NASA’s MoﬀeƩ Field (www.streeƟnsider.com). The campus includes oﬃce and R&D space as well as company housing and ameniƟes such as, dining, sports, ﬁtness, child care, conference and parking faciliƟes for its employees, as well as recreaƟon and parking faciliƟes and infrastructure improvements for NASA’s use. Google’s campus, also referred to as “Googleplex” is an interacƟve campus where employees can ride bikes to and from meeƟngs and dogs are encourage to come to work with their owners (www.google.com). Other on‐site ameniƟes include: Café staƟons that provide free healthy snacks and a great place for a quick meeƟng Outdoor tables and seaƟng for lunch, a break, or for use as a meeƟng space Figure 12 Gateway 1, is adjacent to the Metrolink StaƟon, Gateway 2 includes a commercial shopping center with a movie theater Figure 13 Google Earth Image of “Googleplex” Mountain View, CA ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 15 A New Class for Industrial Parks Exercise rooms Game rooms with video games, foosball, pool tables and Ping‐Pong And even a baby grand piano (www.howstuﬀworks.com/internet/basics/ google6.htm and www.google.com). Bay Area Economics (BAE) report, Economic Beneﬁts Study of NASA Ames Research Center and NASA Research park in Silicon Valley, oﬀers an analysis on this unique model and insight into the ameniƟes oﬀered. NASA Ames Research Park is considered a successful public‐private partnership not just with Google but a total of 70 on‐site partners occupying approximately 675,000 square feet of building space (BAE, 2010, p. These public‐private partnerships provide: World‐class shared‐use R&D and educaƟon campus for industry, academia, nonproﬁts, and government; A center for innovaƟon and entrepreneurship; A unique community of scienƟsts, engineers, students and educators with a shared mission (BAE, 2010, p. 52). There are plans for a mulƟ‐university campus on 75 acres of the 300 acre NASA Ames Research Center at MoﬀeƩ Field. The campus is slated to have laboratories, classrooms and homes for 3,000 people (Perlman, 2009). A mulƟtude of universiƟes have lined up to form partnerships for this future research park: Carnegie Mellon, Santa Clara University and Center for RoboƟc ExploraƟon and Space Technologies, University of California, Foothill‐De Anza Community College District and InternaƟonal Space University. Not only do the universiƟes oﬀer partnerships for research but they also serve as a prototype for green technologies, sustainability, and workforce training. These developments, esƟmated to begin construcƟon between 2013 and 2015, will be linked to CalTrain for a walkable, bike friendly environment (BAE, 2010, p. 73). The quality of life in the San Francisco Bay Area is another perk to the locaƟon of the Ames Research Park. NASA contributes to the to the region’s quality of life through its public outreach and stewardship programs these include: The San Francisco Bay Trail– they have opened addiƟonal secƟon of the 500 mile Bay Trail to improve recreaƟonal access Cultural Tourism– in conjuncƟon with the compleƟon of the Bay Trail and restoraƟon of the salt marshes a signage program is being developed to link the history of NASA Ames, the former Naval Air StaƟon at MoﬀeƩ Field and the ecology of the Bay Figure 14 Google outdoor café and shared bikes Source: www.techchuncks.com ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 16 A New Class for Industrial Parks Burrowing Owl Habitat– these owls were once the most common migratory bird in the Bay Area, due to land development and ground squirrel eradicaƟon they are now a species of concern, NASA has partnered with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect these owls Wetlands PreservaƟon and RestoraƟon– A partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Cargill Salt Company to study salt evaporaƟon ponds Reclaimed Water– NASA Ames uses reclaimed water from the City of Sunnyvale, reducing demand from the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir Ongoing RemediaƟon– Working to cleanup contaminated sites leŌ by the former base Irvine Spectrum Within Orange County Irvine Spectrum is one of closest business parks to Anaheim Canyon. The two business centers are oŌen compared to one another. Irvine Spectrum consists of 6 planning areas and is approximately 3,260 acres (City staﬀ, 2012). This area is most widely known for its regional shopping and entertainment desƟnaƟon, Irvine Spectrum Center. With over 130 shops, restaurants, and entertainment opƟons (including a Ferris Wheel) this commercial center is centrally located within the business park (www.irvinespectrum.com). Like Anaheim Canyon, Irvine Spectrum also has a train staƟon. The Irvine Transit StaƟon oﬀers more connecƟons including Metrolink, Amtrak, OCTA, and the FlyAway ShuƩle to Los Angeles InternaƟonal Airport. Figure 15 Google Earth Map of Irvine Spectrum, the Great Park is currently being build on the old El Toro Marine Base to the north, the Irvine Train StaƟon and Irvine Spectrum Shopping Center are centrally located within the Spectrum planning area ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 17 A New Class for Industrial Parks Development within the Irvine Spectrum area is guided by the General Plan and Chapter 9 of the Irvine Zoning Code; Irvine does not use Speciﬁc Plans. The Zoning Code indicates that warehouse and sales outlets are permiƩed uses with excepƟon of one planning area in the Spectrum that requires a CondiƟonal Use Permit. This coupled with a strong retail anchor center help to promote use of the area during non‐ business hours. Landscaping within this area is well done and enhances the image of the business park. Some of the same connecƟvity issues experienced in Anaheim Canyon exist in regards to sidewalks and access to OCTA bus stops. Although the Spectrum is adjacent to the Great Park; the train tracks are a barrier and work on the park has not yet begun on this side of the site. A markeƟng brochure used by Cushman & Wakeﬁeld boasts the following ameniƟes within the Spectrum: Restaurants and other retail ameniƟes Basketball courts Convenient to Spectrum Entertainment Center Immediately adjacent to major walking/ jogging biking trail Close proximity of the 1‐5, 1‐405 and SR 133 freeways Located near Kaiser & Hoag hospitals Campus environment Many of the ameniƟes listed above are similar to those in Anaheim Canyon with the excepƟon that the Spectrum oﬀers newer faciliƟes. Small retail strips can be found throughout the business park providing dry cleaning services, quick lunch opƟons, and other conveniences. ResidenƟal uses are within close proximity to Figure 16 Images of Irvine Spectrum Top: Landscaping Middle: Irvine Spectrum Center BoƩom: Irvine TransportaƟon StaƟon ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 18 A New Class for Industrial Parks the Spectrum. Shady Canyon, Quail Hollow, The Park, and The Village are a few of the Irvine Company properƟes that oﬀer workforce housing close to or within the Spectrum. Oak Creek golf course is also a nearby amenity oﬀering businesses and residents access to a Fazio‐ designed course (www.irvinecompanyoﬃce.com). Refer to Appendix B for an evaluaƟon sheet used for each case study. Survey Results Data CollecƟon Methods The survey was iniƟally made available to the public at the Anaheim Canyon Community Workshop at the new Kaiser Permanente hospital on East La Palma Avenue. The workshop was held on February 15th from 4 to 6pm. A mix of approximately 35 residents, business owners, and property owners were in aƩendance. Paper copies of the survey were distributed along with self‐addressed envelopes for easy return. The project website was presented to the aƩendees during the presentaƟon and the web address for the survey was also provided on the survey handouts for anyone wanƟng to complete it online through Survey Monkey. A workshop summary e‐mail with a link to the survey was sent to the Anaheim Advisory Working Group as well as all members of the public who provided their e‐mail when signing in for the workshop. Canvasing cards were also used to promote the online survey. Cards were distributed throughout Anaheim Canyon including The Crossings apartment community, Starbucks, It’s a Grind, Canyon StaƟon, and Kaiser Hospital as well as at several other shops and restaurants. The card is included in Appendix C. Due to a low response rate from the workshop and canvasing cards. Surveys were distributed during the lunch hour at Blake’s Place BBQ. Blake’s was chosen due to their high traﬃc rate during lunch and the owners willingness to allow someone to survey their customers. The survey was available online through March 31st. Data was retrieved from Survey Monkey on April 1st. HandwriƩen surveys were added to the data collected from the online responses. The survey results are discussed below, the quesƟons and results are also aƩached in Appendix C. Survey PopulaƟon A total of 61 people completed the survey between February 12th and March 31st. The survey asked several demographic quesƟons to collect informaƟon about users of the area. Approximately 81% of respondents reported they come to Anaheim Canyon for work. About 43% of the parƟcipants were age 50 to 69 and 35% were age 35 to 49. The majority of the respondents were either business owners or employees and approximately 25% of them have been coming to Anaheim Canyon for more than 20 years. Survey Findings Overall, respondents of the survey were neutral in regards to their saƟsfacƟon with the current ameniƟes in Anaheim Canyon. However, more people were saƟsﬁed than dissaƟsﬁed. About 30% of respondents were saƟsﬁed (answers from saƟsﬁed to neutral, but not including neutral) verses 23% who said they were dissaƟsﬁed (from neutral to dissaƟsﬁed, but not including neutral). See Figure 17 on page 19. Three amenity categories emerged as having great importance to the survey parƟcipants they were: restaurants, mobility/accessibility, and appearance. ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 19 A New Class for Industrial Parks Appearance Enhanced landscaping ranked second among the improvements that could beƩer serve the community. QuesƟons 3 and 4 were open ended and allowed respondents to list the things they like the most and least about Anaheim Canyon. Answers varied, things that respondents liked the most were cleanliness, locaƟon, and proximity to the highway. Some of the things least liked about this area included the dump site, a lack of restaurants, shopping, and entertainment, as well as a lack of uniformity and heavy traﬃc during rush hour. These answers give insight to the respondents percepƟon of Anaheim Canyon’s appearance. In quesƟon 4 (what they liked least) , 9 out of 40 responses related to the appearance of the area. In quesƟon 3 (what they liked the most), 6 out of the 40 responses also related to appearance. While some respondents described it as a “nice and clean” environment they noted that Anaheim Canyon is dated. Conversely, one individual who listed appearance as one of the things they liked least noted that the, “Public areas need to look beƩer.” Another said that it, “lacks a friendly atmosphere, [that] it is too corporate.” And yet another described it as “Disjointed, old in most areas, seems neglected.” When asked “What types of acƟviƟes would you parƟcipate in if they were available in Anaheim Canyon?” about 56% of respondents said they would walk to an outdoor plaza or park to take a break or have lunch. See Figure 18 on page 20. Adding parks and plazas could help in the beauƟﬁcaƟon of the area; this ideas is further expanded on in the Planning RecommendaƟons secƟon. Mobility/Accessibility Respondents idenƟﬁed accessibility in several diﬀerent facets throughout Anaheim Canyon. Proximity to the freeways, bike/pedestrian access, as well as the Metrolink StaƟon, and access to the Santa Ana River Trail were all covered in the survey. Respondents found access to the highways to be an advantage of the area. About 92% of those surveyed said they get to work by car. Only 5% of the respondents use a combinaƟon of the Metrolink Train and a car and about 3% ride their bike. When asked if they Figure 17 Responses to QuesƟon 2, The majority of respondents reported a neutral aƫtude toward the current ameniƟes oﬀered in Anaheim Canyon 8.33% 5.00% 16.67% 46.67% 11.67% 5.00% 6.67% 5 3 10 28 7 3 4 How satisfied are you with the current amenities in Anaheim Canyon? DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL SATISFIED ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 20 A New Class for Industrial Parks would ride their bike to work if there were more bike paths within Anaheim Canyon 70% responded no. However, when asked if there was a free shuƩle or trolley from the Metrolink StaƟon to stops throughout Anaheim Canyon about 48% said they would use the service while 52% did not see it as an added beneﬁt. Having such a large percentage of the survey respondents open to an alternaƟve mode of transportaƟon is promising, ideas for capitalizing on this are further discussed in the Planning RecommendaƟons secƟon. BeƩer access to the Santa Ana River Trail was the least supported amenity with an average of 3.82 on a scale of 0 to 7. In two follow up quesƟons regarding the Santa Ana River Trail the results were consistent, 74% said they do not currently use the trail and in the second follow up quesƟon 37% reported that even if there was increased access their use of the trail would not change. However, approximately 44% of respondents to this quesƟon said if there was more access their use of it may change during non‐business hours, mostly on weekends. Restaurants When asked which ameniƟes should be improved restaurants were the front runner with an average ranking of 5.96 on a scale of 0 to 7. The desire for more restaurants was again echoed in quesƟon 7, approximately 73% of respondents said they would have dinner at a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon if more opƟons were available. QuesƟon 13 reveals more about the respondents current use of restaurants for dinner in Anaheim Canyon. As Figure 19 on the next page shows few respondents frequent Anaheim Canyon for dinner. QuesƟon 12 asked about lunch habits of respondents. Since this area predominantly contains business complexes it is no surprise that respondents to the survey frequent restaurants in this area much more for lunch than dinner. About 88% of respondents indicated that they eat lunch in Anaheim Canyon once a week or more. Figure 18 About 50% or more of respondents to quesƟon 6 said they would use addiƟonal connecƟvity, open space, commercial centers, and restaurants if they were available in Anaheim Canyon 52.5% 55.9% 50.8% 72.9% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 1 2 3 4 What types of activities would you participate in if they were available in Anaheim Canyon? (check all that apply) 1 Use sidewalks, bike paths, and the Santa Ana River Trail for walking, running or biking 2 Walk to an outdoor plaza or park to take a break or have lunch 3 Shop at a commercial center in Anaheim Canyon 4 Have dinner at a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 21 A New Class for Industrial Parks QuesƟon 15, “Do you have a favorite local spot in Anaheim Canyon (a place for coﬀee, lunch, or just a break)?” has been omiƩed from this analysis since surveys were collected at Blake’s Place BBQ restaurant. CollecƟng surveys here skewed the data as the majority of the respondents said that Blake’s is their favorite spot. While that might be true it cannot be determined if they felt persuaded to answer the quesƟon due to the fact that they were answering the survey in the restaurant. In quesƟon 4 (What do you like least about Anaheim Canyon?) a lack of restaurants was listed by 9 of the 40 people who responded to this quesƟon. One respondent included that they “drive to Orange to go shopping and for lunch.” While Orange isn’t too far away Anaheim is potenƟally losing tax revenue if other employees or users of this area do the same. SoluƟons to the lack of restaurants, mobility, and appearance “problems” are further discussed in the Planning RecommendaƟons secƟon. Planning RecommendaƟons Property owners, businesses, and real estate brokers use ameniƟes to market their property or company whether as a sales tool or as employee incenƟves. The available ameniƟes can help to set it apart from other properƟes and as menƟoned earlier they can even help to increase property values. The following recommendaƟons are intended for the use of the City of Anaheim Planning Department and MIG. They may also be useful to real estate brokers in the area. RecommendaƟons have been broken down into the following categories: BeauƟﬁcaƟon, Mobility & ConnecƟvity, Land Use, Economic Development and Community Involvement. BeauƟﬁcaƟon Add landscaping and create a beauƟﬁcaƟon project for area water retenƟon basins known as Anaheim Lakes in partnership with the Orange County Water District. Create landscape and design guidelines to aid development of the area for a more consistent look, visually connecƟng potenƟal new walkways, open space, and bike paths between public and private properƟes. A form based code might be a good way to encourage a more uniﬁed look throughout the area. Use Development Agreements to raise money for landscaping improvements throughout Anaheim Canyon. Give incenƟves to developers who include plazas and open public space in new business complexes. For instance, reduce height restricƟons, let the developer build a taller building in exchange for larger front setbacks that incorporate these open public areas. Figure 19 QuesƟon 13, Dinner is not a popular meal in Anaheim Canyon. About 84% of survey respondents have dinner at a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon 3 Ɵmes or less per month 38% 46% 14% 2% 0% How often do you frequent a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon for dinner (per month)? Never 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 or more ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 22 A New Class for Industrial Parks A master sign program (like the one currently required in the PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan) could be used as another way to achieve a more uniform look throughout Anaheim Canyon. Mobility & ConnecƟvity CompleƟon of the proposed pedestrian access tunnel and walkway between the Metrolink StaƟon, The Crossing apartment complex, and new Kaiser Permanente Hospital as shown in Figure 20 and discussed in the IBI Anaheim Canyon StaƟon Master Site Plan (see References) is recommended to beƩer connect these heavily used areas of Anaheim Canyon. Encourage or start a bike sharing program or bike lockers at Metrolink so commuters could use a commuter bike instead of a commuter car for mobility. Partner with OCTA to run a shuƩle from the Metrolink StaƟon throughout Anaheim Canyon during peak hours. Funding sources for this could be through OCTA, a Business Improvement District, or possibly grants to get it started (the U.S. Economic Development AdministraƟon and the Federal TransportaƟon AdministraƟon both oﬀer a number of grants). Bulb‐outs could be used along busy intersecƟons to increase pedestrian safety by shortening the distance to cross and increasing their line of sight (Snyder et al, 2011, 14‐5). They also to help to calm traﬃc which will make it more bike and pedestrian friendly. Public Works improvement projects are currently underway including the extension and introducƟon of sidewalks along East La Palma Avenue. The City should conƟnue to add sidewalk connecƟvity where possible, concentraƟng on creaƟng access to restaurants, shopping, and open spaces like parks or plazas. The current North East Speciﬁc Plan includes sidewalk waivers, it is not recommended to conƟnue using these in the updated plan. If might be for Public Works to see if any of these temporary waivers have expired and where addiƟonal sidewalks can be added. Figure 20 Metrolink SchemaƟc Plan for increased pedestrian connecƟvity, including a pedestrian tunnel connecƟng Kaiser Hospital and The Crossings Apartment Complex to Canyon StaƟon. Source: IBI Metrolink Plan Figure 21 Graphic depicƟng the use of bulb‐outs at an intersecƟon Source: www.greatergreaterwashington.org ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 23 A New Class for Industrial Parks Land Use IdenƟfy the gateway areas and possibly parcels around Camelot family recreaƟon center as “entertainment zone(s)” where land uses like restaurants, theaters, shopping, addiƟonal recreaƟon, etc. would be encouraged. Add incenƟves to the Speciﬁc Plan for restaurant uses. Locate these uses near the entertainment zones and churches to facilitate use of the restaurants during non‐ business hours. ConƟnue to include ﬂexible regulaƟons, like mixed use development, near PaciﬁCenter (also referred to as Canyon StaƟon) to allow for future residenƟal development. This would provide workforce housing for the hospital and local businesses. This could be an area where the City could include aﬀordable housing units. Also consider potenƟal development in this area for hotels (one extended stay hotel already exists) to serve the hospital and business travelers. Parking in some of the older areas and side streets is overcapacity and appears to be inadequate. Buildings may have new tenants that require more parking or perhaps the business of the exisƟng use has grown and there are more employees on the premises then originally planned. A parking study of the area is recommended to determine if this is the case (maybe the businesses are using their parking spaces for something other than employee and customer parking). If parking is determined to be inadequate the study should also suggest how to increase the parking capacity to accommodate future growth within Anaheim Canyon. Include addiƟonal land use ﬂexibility for a University Satellite Campus or Research Facility. With an abundance of Colleges and UniversiƟes in Southern California this industrial park could be a great opportunity for public‐private partnerships as well as a way to provide skilled labor for the area. The Anaheim Center for New Energy Technology (AC‐NET) is a partnership between California State University Fullerton (CSUF) and the City of Anaheim (for more informaƟon see page Capitalizing on the AC‐NET partnership could be a great foundaƟon for research faciliƟes and energy advancements in Anaheim Canyon. Allow warehouse sales on the weekends to encourage use of the area during non‐ business hours. Economic Development Fees from a Business Improvement District, could also be used for landscaping improvements, new gateway signage, and maintenance. TransiƟon the Anaheim Canyon working group to an autonomous group, perhaps though the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. Encourage them to be the catalyst of change for the area. The City can set the framework but if the businesses, local real estate community, and users of the area don’t have ownership of the ideas and the plan for improvement, implementaƟon to change the area will be a much slower process. Community Involvement Maintain the Anaheim Canyon website beyond the Speciﬁc Plan process. This online community could serve as a place where property owners, businesses, real estate brokers etc. could post informaƟon about available properƟes, jobs, as well as sales and events. The City could provide updates about the Enterprise Zone, any landscaping or public improvements, etc. This online forum ---PAGE BREAK--- Schwab I 24 A New Class for Industrial Parks could also help to create a sense of community. MindMixer is a company that builds and will host this type of webpage, they provide examples at www.mindmixer.com that might help the city to further develop their Anaheim Canyon website. Encourage Anaheim Parks and RecreaƟon, in conjuncƟon with the Anaheim Outdoors ConnecƟvity project, to promote use of the Santa Ana River Trail. Possibly include a pubic installment similar to The Gates in Central Park to increase use of the area by OC residents especially during weekend and non‐ business hours. An annual walk or clean up day may also be a good way to spur community involvement. Conclusion A combinaƟon of improved ameniƟes will help to revitalize Anaheim Canyon. This report makes recommendaƟons in ﬁve areas of opportunity: BeauƟﬁcaƟon, Mobility & ConnecƟvity, Land Use, Economic Development and Community Involvement. Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁc Plan can help to foster a sustainable business and physical environment by incorporaƟng the appropriate recommended ameniƟes into the new plan. Other ideas presented in the RecommendaƟons secƟon are general suggesƟons that Planning and other City departments can incorporate into current or new programs. Users of Anaheim Canyon revealed that appearance, a lack of restaurants, and issues with mobility/accessibility are the three areas they would like to see improved. A mulƟfaceted approach to updaƟng the ameniƟes of Anaheim Canyon will help to keep this area compeƟƟve in the Southern California market. Capitalizing on the integraƟon of new trends and established pracƟces, such as Eco‐Industrial Parks, as well as exisƟng programs, like the City’s Green ConnecƟon program will propel this area into a new “class” for industrial parks. Figure 22 The Gates Central Park Source: gothamist.com ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix A Current Land Use Map for the Northeast Area Speciﬁc Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix B EvaluaƟon Criteria for Case Studies ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- What makes this area successful?‐ iniƟal observaƟons via site visit (for Irvine) What ameniƟes are available? What ameniƟes are being used during site visit? What ameniƟes are promoted via Business Park website? What ameniƟes are discussed in any arƟcles or blogs available online? What ameniƟes are markeƟng by real estate brokers in the area? What is the approximate size of the business park? How many businesses are in the business park? What City documents are available‐ how do they support this planning area? Examples: General Plan Speciﬁc Plan Zoning Code ---PAGE BREAK--- Are any of the ameniƟes supported by Parks and RecreaƟon Departments? How many points of access are there to the business park? What modes are transportaƟon are available? What other uses are promoted? How much of the business park is devoted to public open space? Is this area used during non‐business hours? If so how and by who? Other notes, research, and observaƟons ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix C AmeniƟes Survey QuesƟonnaire Canvasing Card Survey Data HandwriƩen Responses ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Front Back ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Rating Average Response Count 11 7 10 8 6 9 6 4.26 57 16 11 11 5 3 4 5 5.00 55 26 16 6 5 1 1 1 5.96 56 14 5 10 11 6 3 3 4.79 52 6 5 11 12 6 8 9 3.82 57 16 10 10 10 4 1 4 5.09 55 58 3 Bike lanes/ paths Enhanced landscaping Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question1 Restaurants skipped question Answer Options Better access to Santa Ana River Trail Sidewalks/ walking trails answered question The questions below are intended to help the City better understand what types of amenities would be the most desirable in Anaheim Canyon. Please take a moment to fill out this quick survey; it will take about 5 minutes. All answers are anonymous. Thank you for your time! The first few questions are about your general feeling regarding Anaheim Canyon and possible improvements that could better serve this community. Rank the following amenities that you think should be expanded in Anaheim Canyon (7 being the most important and 1 being the least important). Shopping 4.26 5.00 5.96 4.79 3.82 5.09 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 Bike lanes/ paths Sidewalks/ walking trails Restaurants Shopping Better access to Santa Ana River Trail Enhanced landscaping Series1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Rating Average Response Count 5 3 10 28 7 3 4 4.10 60 60 1 8.33% 5.00% 16.67% 46.67% 11.67% 5.00% 6.67% Satisfied 30.00% Dissatisfied 23.33% When removing neutral Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 2 How satisfied are you with the current amenities in Anaheim Canyon? Answer Options Please select one answered question skipped question 8.33% 5.00% 16.67% 46.67% 11.67% 5.00% 6.67% 5 3 10 28 7 3 4 How satisfied are you with the current amenities in Anaheim Canyon? ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Count 40 Break into three categories 40 Restaurants 21 Access/ mobility Appearance Number Response Text 1 Cool Trail 2 The variety of centers and things offered 3 Cool Trails 4 Blakes BBQ 5 light traffic 6 Feels newer/ safer 7 Variety of businesses 8 Proximity 9 zoned good 10 Blake's 11 Variety of restaurants 12 13 Weather 14 Riverbed 15 It's nice from what I see 16 how clean the city keeps it's self 17 Lots of small businesses 18 How clean the city is. 19 Restaurants 20 Trails 21 Relative ease of ingress/egress 22 Location- central to OC; links to Inland via 91 freeway 23 Close to my house and freeways 24 Peaceful 25 Metrolink and bus service 26 Nice and Clean 27 Clean and safe area 28 MFG Location 29 Parallel to 91 30 Location 31 It's A Grind 32 Location, diversity of building types 33 Good Location 34 More restaurants within walking distance. A Chase Bank. 35 Proximity to Residence 36 convenience to freeways and metrolink 37 38 access is good. Public areas need to look better 39 Freeways access. 40 Location business friendly, EZ is a great opportunity for businesses. business owners should be educated about the tremendous benefits of EZ. The enhancement is a great idea. The city should plow forward and ignore the complaints about the planning/building department fees. More time should have been allocated to discussions but Paul limited the questions and the conversation time so I held back from making positive comments about the plan. It's normal for business owners to want the city to do everything for them. But the improvements will work better if there is positive and constructive input from the business owners rather than city bashing about the building department's fees. Its hidden area that most people don't know about. so its kool to explore and bring friends down tot the local bars and stuff. Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 3 What do you like most about Anaheim Canyon? Answer Options answered question skipped question ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Count 40 40 Restaurants 21 Traffic related issues Appearance Number Response Text Other 1 No Restrooms 2 crowdedness and trains 3 No restrooms 4 Busy 5 Traffic 6 lacks a friendly atmosphere, too corporate 7 Anything else will cost me more money 8 road construction 9 Boeing is leaving 10 not enough restaurants 11 12 N/A 13 Bad access to riverbed 14 I haven't found anything I dislike 15 the dump area, smells a little too much 16 Not too many fun places like shopping and entertainment. 17 The dump site. 18 Am satisfied 19 More Shopping 20 Minimal amenities to offer employees such as restaurants, shopping, banks 21 Too industrial- needs better sidewalks, landscaping, etc.- beautify! 22 Not that attractive 23 24 Hot 25 We don't have enough restaurants 26 Don't have enough restaurants or shopping centers. I drive to Orange to go shopping and for lunch. 27 Lack of est-in restaurants and dinner houses 28 Upscale Restaurants to Entertain Customers 29 Outdated 30 Lack of area uniformity 31 Not enough stores or restaurants, vacant spaces 32 Appearance, especially in areas near freeway off-ramps. 33 Disjointed, old in most areas, seems neglected 34 Location in relation to shops and dining. 35 91 Freeway 36 not much within walking distance 37 38 The telephone poles. 39 No restaurants 40 Haphazard development just old, no one's fault Road surface @ Tustin and La Palma does not get repaired quickly after a couple of years of degrade. Traffic to get to and from the freeway along La Palma, Oragnethorpe, Imperial, Lakeview, and Tustin 7:30 to 8:30 am, 4:30 to 6 pm. I am concerned about the environmental impact of the concrete/asphalt crushing operation on Richfield Ave. The prevailing winds are out of the S/SW and asphalt contains asbestos. The upwind properties get asphalt dust from the operation. I think the OCWD and the city should conduct an environmental study to make sure the businesses N/NE of the asphalt crushing operations are adversely impacted. Is the land use permitted by the city for such operations and also a junk yard next to it? Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 4 What do you like least about Anaheim Canyon? Answer Options answered question skipped question ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 26.2% 16 73.8% 45 61 0 Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 5 Part 1 skipped question Do you use the Santa Ana River Trail? Answer Options Yes No answered question Do you use the Santa Ana River Trail? Yes No ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 21.7% 10 43.5% 20 17.4% 8 37.0% 17 46 15 If there were more access points to the Santa Ana River Trail throughout Anaheim Canyon would you use the trail more… (check all that apply) My use of the trail would not change During lunch or on a break skipped question Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 5 Part 2 Mornings or evenings Answer Options answered question On the weekends 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% During lunch or on a break On the weekends Mornings or evenings My use of the trail would not change If there were more access points to the Santa Ana River Trail throughout Anaheim Canyon would you use the trail more… (check all that apply) ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 52.5% 31 55.9% 33 50.8% 30 72.9% 43 59 2 1 Use sidewalks, bike paths, and the Santa Ana River Trail for walking, running or biking 2 Walk to an outdoor plaza or park to take a break or have lunch 3 Shop at a commercial center in Anaheim Canyon 4 Have dinner at a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 6 Shop at a commercial center in Anaheim Canyon Answer Options answered question Walk to an outdoor plaza or park to take a break or have lunch What types of activities would you participate in if they were available in Anaheim Canyon? (check all that apply) Have dinner at a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon Use sidewalks, bike paths, and the Santa Ana River Trail for walking, running or biking skipped question 52.5% 55.9% 50.8% 72.9% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 1 2 3 4 What types of activities would you participate in if they were available in Anaheim Canyon? (check all that apply) ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 81.4% 48 11.9% 7 20.3% 12 1.7% 1 3.4% 2 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 59 2 skipped question Work Medical Care Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 7 Restaurants answered question Answer Options Shopping Recreation Other (please specify) What brings you to Anaheim Canyon? Church 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% What brings you to Anaheim Canyon? ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 91.5% 54 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 59 2 Car Other (please specify) Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 8 Bus skipped question Answer Options Walk Metrolink Train and Car answered question How do you typically get to Anaheim Canyon? Bike 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Car Metrolink Train and Car Bus Bike Walk Other (please specify) How do you typically get to Anaheim Canyon? ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 29.3% 17 70.7% 41 58 3 Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 9 skipped question If there were more bike paths within Anaheim Canyon would you ride your bike to the area? Answer Options Yes No answered question If there were more bike paths within Anaheim Canyon would you ride your bike to the area? Yes No ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 63.2% 12 10.5% 2 26.3% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 19 42 skipped question If you use Metrolink to get to Anaheim Canyon what mode of transportation do you use to get to your final destination? Carpool Commuter Car answered question Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 10 Walk Answer Options Other (please specify) Bike If you use Metrolink to get to Anaheim Canyon what mode of transportation do you use to get to your final destination? Commuter Car Bike Walk Carpool Other (please specify) ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 47.9% 23 52.1% 25 48 13 Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 11 skipped question If there was a free shuttle or trolley from the Metrolink station to stops throughout Anaheim Canyon would you use it? Answer Options Yes No answered question If there was a free shuttle or trolley from the Metrolink station to stops throughout Anaheim Canyon would you use it? Yes No ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 11.9% 7 22.0% 13 16.9% 10 28.8% 17 3.4% 2 11.9% 7 5.1% 3 59 2 skipped question Never 5 Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 12 2 answered question Answer Options 4 1 More How often do you frequent a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon for lunch (per week)? 3 How often do you frequent a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon for lunch (per week)? Never 1 2 3 4 5 More ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 38.6% 22 45.6% 26 14.0% 8 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 57 4 skipped question How often do you frequent a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon for dinner (per month)? 7-9 Never answered question Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 13 4-6 Answer Options 10 or more 1-3 38% 46% 14% 2% 0% How often do you frequent a restaurant in Anaheim Canyon for dinner (per month)? Never 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 or more ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 40.4% 23 36.8% 21 10.5% 6 5.3% 3 7.0% 4 57 4 skipped question How often do you frequent Anaheim Canyon during “non-business” hours? Three times a week Never answered question Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 14 Twice a week Answer Options Four or more times per week Once a week How often do you frequent Anaheim Canyon during “non-business” hours? Never Once a week Twice a week Three times a week Four or more times per week ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 56.4% 31 43.6% 24 31 55 6 Number If yes where? 1 Islands 2 Blake's 3 Blake's 4 Blake's 5 Blake's 6 Blake's 7 Blake's 8 Blake's 9 Blake's 10 Blake's 11 Blake's 12 Blake's 13 Blake's 14 Blake's 15 We need more 16 Anaheim Festival Center 17 Blake's 18 Blake's 19 Tom's 20 Blake's 21 enjoy walking along santa ana river trail 22 California Fish Grill 23 Starbucks 24 Polly's Pies (Orange) 25 Starbucks 26 Subway at La Palma and Kraemer 27 It's A Grind coffee 28 Golden Spoon Yogurt 29 i eat luch at Kimmies in Placentia ( Orangethopre and Lakeview) 30 Miraloma Cafe and Blakes Near Red Gum Creative Campus 31 Foxfire Restaurant Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 15 skipped question No Do you have a favorite local spot in Anaheim Canyon (a place for coffee, lunch, or just a break)? answered question Yes If yes where? Answer Options Do you have a favorite local spot in Anaheim Canyon (a place for coffee, lunch, or just a break)? Yes No ---PAGE BREAK--- Zip Code % Response Count Response Count 90266 1.69% 1 59 90620 1.69% 1 59 90621 5.08% 3 2 90703 1.69% 1 91709 1.69% 1 Number Response Text 92008 1.69% 1 1 92663 92544 1.69% 1 2 92869 92570 1.69% 1 3 92869 92582 1.69% 1 4 92821 92602 1.69% 1 5 92886 92603 1.69% 1 6 90621 92625 1.69% 1 7 90621 92630 1.69% 1 8 92870 92648 3.39% 2 9 92880 92653 1.69% 1 10 92602 92663 1.69% 1 11 91709 92672 1.69% 1 12 90621 92677 1.69% 1 13 92866 92691 1.69% 1 14 92808 92704 1.69% 1 15 92807 92780 1.69% 1 16 92630 92782 1.69% 1 17 92691 92804 1.69% 1 18 92704 92805 1.69% 1 19 92653 92806 3.39% 2 20 92782 92807 6.78% 4 21 92008 92808 3.39% 2 22 92805 92821 1.69% 1 23 92867 92831 5.08% 3 24 92831 92840 1.69% 1 25 92869 92841 1.69% 1 26 92886 92861 3.39% 2 27 92840 92866 1.69% 1 28 90703 92867 6.78% 4 29 92570 92869 5.08% 3 30 92887 92870 1.69% 1 31 92780 92880 1.69% 1 32 92648 92886 3.39% 2 33 92831 92887 6.78% 4 34 92807 35 92807 36 92867 37 92648 38 92807 39 92861 40 92831 41 90266 42 92544 43 92582 44 90620 45 92887 46 92887 47 92861 48 92887 49 92672 50 92603 51 92808 52 92841 53 92806 54 92867 55 92806 56 92625 57 92867 58 92804 59 92677 Please help us to better understand the people who use this area by answering a few questions about yourself below: Please provide the ZIP code where you live: Answer Options answered question skipped question Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 16 Part 1 90266 90620 90621 90703 91709 92008 92544 92570 92582 ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Count 53 53 8 Number Response Text 1 92806 Zip Code % Response Count 2 92806 91761 1.89% 1 3 92806 92614 1.89% 1 4 92806 92705 1.89% 1 5 92806 92801 1.89% 1 6 92806 92803 3.77% 2 7 91761 92805 3.77% 2 8 varies 92806 43.40% 24 9 92806 92807 30.19% 16 10 92806 92816 1.89% 1 11 92806 92870 1.89% 1 12 So Cal Region Other 5.66% 3 13 92803 14 92803 15 92806 16 92806 17 92705 18 92816 19 92806 20 92806 21 92807 22 92806 23 92806 24 92801 25 92870 26 Long Beach 27 92806 28 92807 29 92806 30 92806 31 92807 32 92807 33 92807 34 92807 35 92807 36 92807 37 92807 38 92807 39 92807 40 92807 41 92807 42 90620 and 92806 43 92807 44 92805 45 92806 46 92805 47 92806 48 92807 49 92806 50 92807 51 92806 52 92806 53 92614 Please provide the ZIP code where you work: Answer Options answered question skipped question Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 16 Part 2 91761 92614 92705 92801 92803 92805 92806 92807 92816 92870 Other ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 1.9% 1 11.1% 6 35.2% 19 42.6% 23 9.3% 5 54 7 Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 16 Part 3 skipped question Which category below includes your age? 50-69 18 or younger answered question 36-49 Answer Options 70 or older 19-35 2% 11% 35% 43% 9% Which category below includes your age? 18 or younger 19-35 36-49 50-69 70 or older ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 40.0% 22 14.5% 8 0.0% 0 7.3% 4 56.4% 31 55 6 Number Other (please specify) 1 Work 2 Work 3 N/A 4 N/A 5 Employee 6 N/A 7 N/A 8 Sales 9 Work 10 N/A 11 N/A 12 Employee 13 Boeing engineer 14 Employee 15 Employee 16 Visitor 17 Sales 18 Employee 19 Employee 20 Neighbor 21 Visiting 22 Work 23 Work 24 Work 25 Employee 26 Employee of Anaheim business not in the Canyon 27 Employee 28 Leasing Consultant 29 Creative Director and Phjotographer 30 work ~ 1130 North Miller St., Anaheim CA 92806 31 Business Visitor Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Question 16 Part 4 skipped question What is your role in Anaheim Canyon? (check all that apply) Resident Business owner answered question Realtor Answer Options Other (please specify) Property owner 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Business owner Property owner Realtor Resident Other (please specify) What is your role in Anaheim Canyon? (check all that apply) ---PAGE BREAK--- Response Percent Response Count 3.4% 2 18.6% 11 23.7% 14 15.3% 9 13.6% 8 25.4% 15 59 2 Less than 1 year More than 20 years Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Amenities Survey 2012 Part 5 6-10 years skipped question Answer Options 16-20 years 1-5 years answered question How long have you been coming to Anaheim Canyon? 11-15 years 3% 19% 24% 15% 14% 25% How long have you been coming to Anaheim Canyon? Less than 1 year 1‐5 years 6‐10 years 11‐15 years 16‐20 years More than 20 years ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix D Current markeƟng brochure for Canyon Point real estate brokers highlighƟng service ameniƟes ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix E Eco‐Industrial Parks in the United States ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Some eco‐industrial park projects in the United States Source: Cote and Rosenthal, 1998 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- References ACNET‐Anaheim.com. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from hƩp://www.acnet‐anaheim.net Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. (2011). 2011 Anaheim Brokers Survey Findings. Anaheim. Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. (June 2011). Focus Group Follow up Summary. Anaheim. Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, & Agency 51. (2010). Anaheim Canyon Focus Group Trends Summary. Anaheim. Audience Dialogue. Retrieved October 15, 2011, from How to Write a Survey Report: hƩp:// www.audiencedialogue.net/surveyreport.html Bay Area Economics, AECOM, & NASA Ames Research Center. (2010, March). www.bae1.com. Retrieved 9 13, 2011, from Bay Area Economics: hƩp://bae1.com/Documents/EBSReport_2010.pdf Carpenter, E. (2011, May 18). The Orange County Register. Retrieved October 17, 2011, from Church plans $45‐ million home at Boeing site: www.ocregister.com/news/church‐3011320site‐million.html City of Anaheim. Public UƟliƟes. Retrieved January 12, 2012, from www.anaheim.net: hƩp://www.anaheim.net/ secƟon.asp?id=162 City of Irvine. Planning. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from www.cityoﬁrvine.org Cote, & Cohen‐Rosenthal, E. (1998). Designing eco‐industrial parks: a of some experiences. Journal of Cleaner ProducƟon, 181‐188. Dorich, A. (2010, Winter). Highland Fairview. Building and ConstrucƟon West, pp. Online Version Mayfair Business Media. Dunham‐Jones, & Williamson, J. (2009). Retroﬁƫng Suburbia: Urban Design SoluƟons for Redesigning Suburbs. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Erkman, S. (1997). Industrial ecology: an historical view. Journal of Cleaner ProducƟon, 1‐10. ExisƟng and Developing Eco‐Industrial Park Sites in the U.S. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from UCSC: hƩp:// www2.ucsc.edu/gei/eco‐industrial_parks.html Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the CreaƟve Class. New York: Basic Books. Frej, & et al. (2001). Business Park and Industrial Development Handbook. Washington, D.C.: ULI‐the Urban Land InsƟtute. IBI Group. (1990). Northeast Area Speciﬁc Plan. Anaheim. IBI Group. (2007). Anaheim Canyon StaƟon Master Site Plan. Indigo Development. (2006, April). Eco‐Industrial Parks (EIPs). Retrieved February 24, 2012, from hƩp:// www.indigodev.com/Ecoparks.html Info Poll Online Technical Support. (1998, October 16). Retrieved October 16, 2011, from hƩp://www.accesscable.net/ ~infopoll/Ɵps.htm Irvine Company. Retrieved January 12, 2012, from www.irvinecompany.com: hƩp://www.irvinecompany.com/Our‐ ProperƟes/Oﬃce‐ProperƟes.aspx Irvine Company. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from Irvine Spectrum Center: www.shopirvinespectrumcenter.com Kim, S. (2011). The Canyon Speciﬁc Plan Update RFP. Anaheim. Kirk, P. (2011, July/ August 2011). Redeﬁning CreaƟve Space. Urban Land, pp. 54‐61. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- MarƟn, S. Weitz, K. Cushman, R. Sharman, Lindrooth, R. & Moran, S. R. (1996). Eco‐Industrial Parks: A Case Study and Analysis of Economic, Environmental, Technical, and Regulatory Issues. Research Triangle Park: Research Triance InsƟtute. MindMixer.com. Retrieved April 20, 2012, from hƩp://www.mindmixer.com MIG. (2011). The City of Anaheim ConsulƟng Services to Update the Anaheim Canyon Speciﬁc Plan. Fullerton. Monroe, A. (2011, June Sketchers Is Bringing Jobs to Riverside County. www.kmir6.com Perlman, D. (2009, March 14). Joint‐venture university campus planned at Ames. Retrieved February 23, 2012, from SFGate.com: www.sfgate.com/cgi‐bin/arƟcle.cgi?f=/c/a2009/3/14/BAPF16F2J9.DTL Planning Associates Company. (1989, February 28). PaciﬁCenter Speciﬁc Plan 88‐3. Retrieved April 1, 2012, from hƩp:// www.anaheim.net/citydepartments/planning/speciﬁc_plans/paciﬁcenter/ Roberts, B. (2004). The applicaƟon of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco‐ industrial parks: an Australian case study. Journal of Cleaner ProducƟon, 997‐1010. Snyder, R. (2011, October Living Streets LA. Retrieved October 8, 2011, from Model Design Manual for Living Streets: Stratman, D. (2004, April). www.boeing.com. Retrieved October 1, 2011, from Boeing FronƟers Online Volume 02, Issue 11: hƩp://www.boeing.com/news/fronƟers/archive/2004/april/i_ids3.html StreetInsider.com. (2008, June Retrieved 9 13, 2011, from Corporate News Google and NASA Lease Land to Develop New High‐Tech Campus at Ames Research Center: www.streeƟnsider.com/Corporate+News/Google Strickland, J. (2006, December 20). How Google Works. Retrieved February 23, 2003, from howstuﬀworks.com: hƩp:// computer.howstuﬀworks.com/internet/basics/google6.htm The Anaheim Canyon. Retrieved September 13, 2011, from hƩp://www.anaheim.net/thecanyon/index.asp The City of Anaheim. (2010). Sustainable CommuniƟes Planning Grant and IncenƟves Program ApplicaƟon. The City of Anaheim. (2010). The Canyon Development Update. TheOﬃceSports.com. Retrieved Nov 30, 2011, from hƩp://theoﬃcesports.com/ Townsend, & Tully, S. (2007, November 16). The Orange County Register. Retrieved October 17, 2011, from Developer poised to buy Boeing plant: www.ocregister.com/arƟcles/boeing‐76099‐anaheim‐site.html Vander Dussen, S. (2010, June Canyon Economic Development Strategy Work Plan. Anaheim, CA. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix F. General Plan Consistency Analysis Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, Revised Public Draft F-1 Appendix F: General Plan Consistency Analysis Introduction California law (Government Code §65450-§65453) allows cities to develop and administer Specific Plans as an implementation tool for their General Plan. As a requirement of state law, Specific Plans must demonstrate consistency in regulations, guidelines and programs with the goals, objectives, policies, standards, programs and uses that are established in the General Plan. Table 5.8-1 of Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 348 addresses the consistency of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan (ACSP) with the relevant City of Anaheim General Plan Goals and Policies and said table is incorporated by reference into the ACSP.

Document Anaheim_doc_9755a874ec

Full Text