Document Anaheim_doc_8e97a06732

BAL INTE M P LL RO ERSEC Mitigate Prepare Revis OAD/S CTION Initia ed Neg ed by th Marc sed Des SUNKI N IMP al Study ative D he City o ch 2011 sign Mar IST ST ROVE y/ Declara of Anah 1 rch 201 TREET EMENT ation heim 4 T TS ---PAGE BREAK--- NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY/NOTICE OF INTENT Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HAS RELEASED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS FOR A 30-DAY PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT PERIOD. THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPOSES TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECT: Project Description: The proposed project is intended to improve the intersection of Ball Road/Sunkist Street in order to increase efficiency and relieve traffic congestion (see Attachment As part of the preliminary design process for the project, a total of four conceptual alternatives have been prepared, and occur within the same general impact area. The Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed project as described above to the degree of specificity required by Section 15071 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. As indicated in Section 4 (VII). of the Initial Study, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the project site is not listed on hazardous materials databases maintained by various regulatory agencies. This MND would be the primary reference document in the formulation and implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements. Notice of Availability of MND: Please be informed that the City of Anaheim has released the MND for the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements prepared in compliance with CEQA, and the State and City of Anaheim CEQA Guidelines for a 30-day public review period, from June 13th to July 14th, 2014. The MND is available for public review on the City of Anaheim’s website (http://www.anaheim.net/section.asp?id=133 , click on Ball Road Sunkist Intersection Improvement Environmental Documents) and at the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor, Anaheim, CA 92805. All parties are invited to submit written comments on the MND to the address above for consideration by the City Council. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your comments should be sent at the earliest possible date but must arrive no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 14th, 2014. Notice of Public Meetings: The Anaheim City Council will consider adoption of the MND for the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements prepared in compliance with CEQA and the State and City of Anaheim CEQA Guidelines tentatively on July 15th 2014 at 5:30 PM at the City of Anaheim Council Chambers, 200 S, Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor, Anaheim, California 92805. Who to Contact? For more information, please call William Grigsby, Assistant Civil Engineer, Public Works Department, at (714) 765-5100 ext. 5474 or e-mail to [EMAIL REDACTED]. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Anaheim, P.O. Box 3222, Anaheim, CA 92803 ATTACHMENT The proposed project is intended to improve the intersection of Ball Road/Sunkist Street in order to increase efficiency and relieve traffic congestion. As part of the preliminary design process for the project, a total of four conceptual alternatives were prepared, and occur within the same general impact area. After the initial public review of this MND a revised design has been developed to reduce impacts to residents. Generally, the four scenarios range from a conservative impact area requiring increased ROW (right-of-way) acquisition and parking relocation Alternative 1) to one that implements reduced City design standards and the minimum amount of ROW acquisition Alternative However, the fundamental improvements for increasing capacity at this intersection remain the same under each of the four alternatives, and include: • A new second dedicated left-turn lane in both directions along Sunkist Street; • A new third westbound through lane and dedicated right-turn lane along Ball Road; • Modification of the existing median east of the intersection to accommodate additional ROW acquisition. The proposed improvements along Sunkist Street would be the same in each of the four alternatives. In order to accommodate the additional left turn lane in both directions, the roadway section would include 10-foot wide sidewalks, 13-foot wide outside lanes, 11- foot wide through lanes, and 11-foot wide left turn lanes. The revised design provides only one left hand turn lane on northbound Sunkist as this movement was not critical to improving the intersection LOS. The primary variations between the four alternatives would reflect changes in lane widths and associated ROW acquisition along Ball Road. As stated above, Alternative 1 would reflect increased lane widths and increased ROW acquisition, while Alternative 4 would reflect City design sub-standards and the minimum amount of ROW acquisition. Thus, this Preliminary Environmental Checklist assumes that Alternative 1 would be implemented since it reflects the City standards. This assumption remains valid as the revised design has less impact than Alternative 1. Alternative 1 would implement the City’s standard cross section for a six-lane Primary Arterial along Ball Road. The roadway section would include 10-foot wide sidewalks, 13-foot wide foot outside lanes, 11-foot wide through lanes, 11-foot wide left turn lanes, a 4- to 18-foot wide raised median, and a retaining curb at the back of walk, adjacent to the existing retail/commercial center on the northeast corner of the intersection. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - i - Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Initial Study 1 1.2 Incorporation by Reference 1 2.0 Project Description 3 2.1 Project Location 3 2.2 Environmental Setting 3 2.3 Project Characteristics 6 2.4 Agreements, Permits and Approvals 15 2.5 Environmental Summary 15 3.0 Environmental Checklist Form 16 4.0 Environmental Analysis 19 4.1 Aesthetics 19 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 20 4.3 Air Quality 23 4.4 Biological Resources 32 4.5 Cultural Resources 35 4.6 Geology and Soils 37 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 40 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 50 4.9 Hydrology and Water 55 4.10 Land Use and Planning 61 4.11 Mineral Resources 62 4.12 Noise 62 4.13 Population and Housing 69 4.14 Public Services 70 4.15 Recreation 72 4.16 Transportation/Traffic 72 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems 75 4.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance 78 4.19 References 79 4.20 Report Preparation Personnel 80 5.0 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 81 6.0 Appendices 82 ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 LIST OF EXHIBITS 1 Regional Vicinity 4 2 Local Vicinity 5 3 Surrounding Land Uses 7 4a Conceptual Design – Alternative 1 10 4b Conceptual Design – Alternative 2 11 4c Conceptual Design – Alternative 3 12 4d Conceptual Design – Alternative 4 13 4e Revised Design – Precise Alignment 14 LIST OF APPENDICES A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Report B Biological Technical Letter C Hazardous Materials Assessment D Acoustical Assessment ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 1 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.), this Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Anaheim Local CEQA Environmental Procedures. This Initial Study has been prepared to identify and evaluate short-term construction related impacts and long-term operational impacts associated with the implementation of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements. CEQA requires that all State and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority before taking action on them. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency and has the principal responsibility of approving and implementing the proposed project. 1.1 PURPOSE OF INITIAL STUDY Per Section 15063 of the State CEQA guidelines, the Initial Study would provide the Lead Agency, the City of Anaheim, with information to use as basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project. If the Lead Agency finds that there is no evidence that the project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the Lead Agency shall prepare a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15382 defines a “significant effect on the environment” as a substantial, or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, mineral, flora, fauna, ambient noise and object of historic or aesthetic significance. Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines identifies specific disclosure requirements for inclusion in an Initial Study. Pursuant to these requirements, an Initial Study shall include:  Identification of the environmental setting;  A description of the proposed project;  Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries;  Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any;  Examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; and  The name of person who prepared, or participated in the preparation of, the Initial Study. 1.2 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE The following references were utilized during preparation of this Preliminary Environmental Checklist, and are incorporated into this document by reference. These documents are available for review at the City of Anaheim City Hall located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim.  City of Anaheim General Plan (comprehensively updated on May 25, 2004, and as amended thereafter). The City of Anaheim General Plan (General Plan) contains the plan ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 2 - for the future development and operation of the City of Anaheim. The General Plan is divided into ten topical sections, or Elements, including the Introduction, Land Use, Circulation, Green, Public Services and Facilities, Growth Management, Safety, Economic Development, Housing, and Community Design Elements. The General Plan Elements address a wide range of subjects and provide goals and policies that will guide future development in the City.  City of Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330 (May 25, 2004). The City of Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report (General Plan EIR) analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the City’s buildout potential. The General Plan EIR evaluated the impacts of implementing the General Plan, considered broad policy alternatives, and specified program-wide mitigation measures. Analysis in the General Plan EIR concluded that significant and unavoidable impacts would occur regarding Air Quality, Noise, and Traffic and Circulation despite implementation of mitigation measures.  City of Anaheim Zoning Code, (comprehensively updated on June 8, 2004, and as amended thereafter). Title 18 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code is known as the Anaheim Zoning Code (Zoning Code). The purpose of this Zoning Code is to implement the Anaheim General Plan; promote and protect the public health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare in conformance with the General Plan; classify, segregate, restrict, designate, regulate, and encourage the best type, location and use of buildings, structures, and land; and limit the intensity, height, number of stories, and size of buildings and other structures hereafter designed, erected, or altered. The Zoning Code specifies regulations that must be followed by every project within the City’s jurisdictional area. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 3 - 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION Regionally, the proposed project site is located within the City of Anaheim in the northern portion of Orange County, California, approximately 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and seven miles north of Santa Ana. The City is located north of the cities of Stanton, Garden Grove, and Orange, as well as unincorporated Orange County; south of the cities of Fullerton, Placentia, and Yorba Linda; east of the cities of Cypress, and Buena Park; and west of the City of Orange and unincorporated Orange County; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity. Specifically, the project site is located at the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, within the central portion of the City. It is situated approximately one-quarter mile west of SR-57, one- half mile east of State College Boulevard, and approximately one-half mile north of Cerritos Avenue; refer to Avenue; refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity. 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING BALL ROAD The proposed project site would occur within and immediately surrounding the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street. Ball Road is designated as a Primary Arterial within the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan. Currently, west of Sunkist Street, Ball Road is a six-lane (three lanes in each direction) roadway with a striped median. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the roadway. At the signalized intersection of Ball Road/Sunkist Street, eastbound Ball Road provides:  Dual dedicated left-turn lanes from Ball Road to northbound Sunkist Street;  Two through lanes; and  One shared through lane and right-turn lane from Ball Road to southbound Sunkist Street. East of Sunkist Street, Ball Road is a six-lane (three lanes in each direction) roadway, and includes a raised median. The Ball Road/SR-57 interchange is situated approximately 500 feet east of the Ball Road/Sunkist Avenue intersection. On-street parking is not allowed. At the signalized intersection of Ball Road/Sunkist Street, westbound Ball Road provides:  Dual dedicated left-turn lanes from Ball Road to southbound Sunkist Street;  Two through lanes; and  One dedicated right-turn lane from Ball Road to northbound Sunkist Street. SUNKIST STREET Sunkist Street is designated as a Secondary Arterial within the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan. Currently north of Ball Road, Sunkist Street is a four lane (two lanes in each direction) undivided roadway. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of Sunkist Street, north of East Hilda Street. At the signalized intersection of Sunkist Street/Ball Road, southbound Sunkist Street provides: ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Affected area Local Vicinity – Exhibit 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 6 -  One dedicated left-turn lane from Sunkist Street to eastbound Ball Road; One through lane;  One through lane; and  One shared through lane and right-turn lane from Sunkist Street to westbound Ball Road. South of Ball Road, Sunkist Street is a four lane (two lanes in each direction) undivided roadway with a center turn lane. On-street parking is not allowed on either side of the roadway. At the signalized intersection of Sunkist Street/Ball Road, northbound Sunkist Street provides:  One dedicated left-turn lane from Sunkist Street to westbound Ball Road;  One through lane; and  One shared through lane and right-turn lane from Sunkist Street to eastbound Ball Road. SURROUNDING USES The proposed project consists of roadway improvements to the existing intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street. Impacts to surrounding uses could occur since additional right-of-way (ROW) may be required to accommodate the project. The existing surrounding land uses (Exhibit 3) is provided below:  Northern Side of Ball Road: Uses within the project area along the northern side of Ball Road (from west to east) include multi-family residential uses, retail/commercial uses (including a gas station at the northwestern corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection), a retail/commercial center at the northeastern corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, and the SR-57 interchange;  Southern Side of Ball Road: Uses within the project area along the southern side of Ball Road (from west to east) include single- and multi-family residential uses, a medical office building on the southeastern corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, additional single-family residential uses, and the SR-57 interchange;  Western Side of Sunkist Street: Uses within the project area along the western side of Sunkist Street (from north to south) include multi-family residential uses, a gas station at the northwestern corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, and multi-family residential uses;  Eastern Side of Sunkist Street: Uses within the project area along the eastern side of Sunkist Street (from north to south) include single-family residential uses, a retail/commercial center at the northeastern corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, a medical office building at the southeastern corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, and additional single-family residential uses. 2.3 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project is intended to improve the intersection of Ball Road/Sunkist Street in order to increase efficiency and relieve traffic congestion. As part of the preliminary design process for the project, a total of four conceptual alternatives have been prepared, and occur within the same general impact area (as denoted within Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity). ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 7 - Sunkist Street Ball Road Apartment Complex Multi-family Neighborhood Commercial Building SR-57 Off/On Ramps Single-family Neighborhood Single-family Neighborhood Sunburst Way Office Complex Service Station Exhibit 3: Surrounding Land Uses Sunkist Street Ball Road NORTH ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 8 - Generally, the four scenarios range from a conservative impact area requiring increased ROW (right-of-way) acquisition and parking relocation Alternative 1) to one that implements reduced City design standards and the minimum amount of ROW acquisition Alternative However, the fundamental improvements for increasing capacity at this intersection remain the same under each of the four alternatives, and include:  A new second dedicated left-turn lane in both directions along Sunkist Street;  A new third westbound through lane and dedicated right-turn lane along Ball Road;  Modification of the existing median east of the intersection to accommodate additional ROW acquisition. Exhibit 4a, Conceptual Design – Alternative 1, through Exhibit 4d, Conceptual Design – Alternative 4 depicts improvements associated with each of the four alternatives. It should be noted that all of the 4 alternatives originally presented in the initial public review of this Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) were at a preliminary design phase. Actual property title searches and property surveys as well as detailed final design had not been started. During the final design phase additional details were discovered and analyzed to refine the initial design assumptions. Currently the design precise alignment has been completed. All references to the revised design in this document are referring to the precise alignment (Exhibit 4e).The final design is at a 95% level and will be completed this summer. All information in the current design is presented with a high level of certainty and detail. As a result of initial public review of the MND between October 2nd, 2011 and November 1st, 2011 the City of Anaheim met with several property owners and tenants in the area. The community was very concerned that right of way acquisition and construction activities would negatively affect their businesses during the slow economic times of 2011. In order to accommodate the concerns of the community the City of Anaheim did two things. First, the MND was pulled from the City Council agenda and delayed while the concerns of the community were addressed. Second, Alternative 4 was used as a starting point and right of way acquisition was further minimized in all areas. Traffic analysis during the redesign phase indicated that a second left hand turn lane in the northbound direction on Sunkist Street was not as beneficial as a wider right hand lane that would allow lane sharing for right turners and improve traffic flow. In addition, OCTA provided input during the initial public review. They highlighted the concern for review of plans and bike lanes. The City has provided OCTA with the opportunity to review plans during the redesign phase. However, the City was not able to provide a bike lane and reduce right of way acquisition at the same time as these comments are in direct conflict. The proposed improvements along Sunkist Street would be similar in each of the four alternatives. In order to accommodate the additional left turn lane in both directions, the roadway section would include 10-foot wide parkways with ADA compliant sidewalks, 13-foot wide outside lanes, 11-foot wide through lanes, and 11-foot wide left turn lanes. The revised design includes; reduced parkway widths to 7-feet and 8-feet with ADA compliant sidewalks, 16- foot and 18-foot wide outside lanes increasing bike safety and allow lane sharing for right turns, 11-foot wide through lanes, two 10-foot left turn lanes southbound and one 12-foot left turn lane northbound. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 9 - The primary variations between the four alternatives would reflect changes in lane widths and associated ROW acquisition along Ball Road. As stated above, Alternative 1 would reflect increased lane widths and increased ROW acquisition, while Alternative 4 would reflect dimensions of features that are less than the City standards thus providing the minimum amount of ROW acquisition. This Preliminary Environmental Checklist assumes Alternative 1 in order to study the greatest environmental impact. Alternative 1 would implement the City’s standard cross section for a six-lane Primary Arterial along Ball Road. The roadway section would include 10-foot wide sidewalks, 13-foot wide foot outside lanes, 11-foot wide through lanes, 11-foot wide left turn lanes, a 4- to 18-foot wide raised median, and a retaining curb at the back of walk, adjacent to the existing retail/commercial center on the northeast corner of the intersection. This alternative is anticipated to require acquisition of 9,252 square feet of privately owned ROW, affecting 10 parcels adjacent to the intersection. The overall ROW width along Ball Road would be 116 feet west of Sunkist Street and 127 feet east of Sunkist Street. Under this Alternative, the project would also require the relocation of a parking lot associated with the existing retail/commercial center on the northeastern corner of the intersection. Since additional ROW would be required along the existing parking lot along Ball Road, this Alternative proposes to relocate the parking lot to the eastern portion of the property. This new parking area has been disturbed and graded, but is unpaved. It is situated adjacent to the southbound SR-57 off-ramp at Ball Road. Alternative 4 is anticipated to require the acquisition of approximately 2,236 square feet of privately-owned ROW, affecting a total of 3 parcels adjacent to the intersection. The roadway section would include 7-foot wide sidewalks, 11-foot wide foot outside lanes, 11-foot wide through lanes, 10-foot wide left turn lanes, and a 2- to 18-foot wide raised median. The overall ROW width along Ball Road would be 106 feet west of Sunkist Street and 114 feet east of Sunkist Street. Alternatives 1 thru 4 were analyzed prior to completing title searches for the area. The actual required acquisitions would have been higher. Revised design requires the acquisition of approximately 2,593 square feet of privately owned property for ROW and utility easements, affecting 7 parcels. The roadway section along Sunkist Street would include 7-foot to 8-foot wide parkways with ADA compliant sidewalks, 16-foot and 18-foot wide outside lanes increasing bike safety and allow lane sharing for right turns, 11-foot wide through lanes, two 10-foot left turn lanes southbound and one 12-foot left turn lane northbound. The roadway section along Ball Road would include 6-foot to 8-foot wide parkways with ADA compliant sidewalks, a 12-foot wide right turn lane on westbound Ball Road, 11-foot to 14-foot wide outside lanes, 10-foot to 11-foot wide through lanes, a total of three through lanes in each direction, and two 10-foot wide left turn lanes in each direction. The overall ROW for Sunkist Street would be 90-feet. There is no ROW being added along Sunkist Street for roadway and the overall width of the right of way for Sunkist Street is unchanged. The overall ROW for Ball Road would vary between 106-feet wide and 115-feet wide. The widest section of right of way being added is 5 feet wide. The largest right of way needed on a single property is 568 square feet. ---PAGE BREAK--- DATE APPROVED APPROVED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED D.P.W./ CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER PAGES FIELD BOOKS BENCH MARK NO. 7A-45 BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET APP'D D E S C R I P T I O N INITIAL NO. DATE JOSHUA MCNEILL CARRIE DAVIS 4/19/10 CITY OF ANAHEIM ELEVATION: 177.11 (NAVD88) BASS CAP MKD C OF A BM, IN THE TOP OF CATCH BASIN, 1' BEHIND THE CURB FACE, NEAR THE NE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC WORKS APP'D DATE 4/19/10 BCR. ---PAGE BREAK--- DATE APPROVED APPROVED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED D.P.W./ CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER PAGES FIELD BOOKS BENCH MARK NO. 7A-45 BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET APP'D D E S C R I P T I O N INITIAL NO. DATE JOSHUA MCNEILL CARRIE DAVIS 4/19/10 CITY OF ANAHEIM ELEVATION: 177.11 (NAVD88) BASS CAP MKD C OF A BM, IN THE TOP OF CATCH BASIN, 1' BEHIND THE CURB FACE, NEAR THE NE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC WORKS APP'D DATE 4/19/10 BCR. ---PAGE BREAK--- DATE APPROVED APPROVED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED D.P.W./ CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER PAGES FIELD BOOKS BENCH MARK NO. 7A-45 BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET APP'D D E S C R I P T I O N INITIAL NO. DATE JOSHUA MCNEILL CARRIE DAVIS 4/19/10 CITY OF ANAHEIM ELEVATION: 177.11 (NAVD88) BASS CAP MKD C OF A BM, IN THE TOP OF CATCH BASIN, 1' BEHIND THE CURB FACE, NEAR THE NE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC WORKS APP'D DATE 4/19/10 BCR. ---PAGE BREAK--- DATE APPROVED APPROVED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED D.P.W./ CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER PAGES FIELD BOOKS BENCH MARK NO. 7A-45 BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET APP'D D E S C R I P T I O N INITIAL NO. DATE JOSHUA MCNEILL CARRIE DAVIS 4/19/10 CITY OF ANAHEIM ELEVATION: 177.11 (NAVD88) BASS CAP MKD C OF A BM, IN THE TOP OF CATCH BASIN, 1' BEHIND THE CURB FACE, NEAR THE NE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC WORKS APP'D DATE 4/19/10 BCR. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – May 2014 - 15 - 2.4 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS AND APPROVALS Agreements, permits, and approvals required for implementation of the project would include the following, among others:  City of Anaheim – CEQA Clearance  City of Anaheim – Plan Review  City of Anaheim – Construction Permits  California Department of Transportation – Encroachment Permit NOT REQUIRED FOR REVISED DESIGN  Multiple Parties – Right-of-Way Acquisition 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY 1. Project Title: Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 2. Agency Name and Address: City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mr. Sandip Budhia, Associate Engineer City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 [PHONE REDACTED] 4. Project Location: At the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street within the central portion of the City of Anaheim. 5. General Plan Designation: Ball Road and Sunkist Street are designated as a Primary Arterial and Secondary Arterial by the City’s General Plan, respectively. Uses immediately surrounding the intersection are designated Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and General Commercial. 6. Zoning: Uses immediately surrounding the intersection are designated by the City’s Zoning Code as Multiple-Family Residential (RM-4), Single-Family Residential (RS-3), General Commercial and Low Intensity Office 7. Description of the Project: Refer to Section 2.3, Project Characteristics. 8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Uses immediately surrounding the intersection include single-family and multi-family residential, a gas station, retail/commercial, and a medical office building. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 17 - EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 2) A list of “Supporting Information Sources” must be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the Narrative Summary for each section. 3) Response Column Heading Definitions: a) Potentially Significant Impact is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact”. The mitigation measures must be described, along with a brief explanation of how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. c) Less Than Significant Impact applies where the project creates no significant impacts, only Less Than Significant impacts. d) No Impact applies where a project does not create an impact in that category. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one proposed the project falls outside of a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 4) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to a tiering, program EIR, Master EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15062(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 18 - 5) Incorporate into the checklist any references to information sources for potential impacts the General Plan, zoning ordinance). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 6) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 19 - 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Narrative Summary: Section Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project site is located within an urbanized area that has been completely disturbed. The project would include roadway widening improvements that would improve intersection operation along Ball Road and Sunkist Street. Construction of the proposed project may create temporary aesthetic nuisances associated with construction activities. Exposed surfaces, construction debris, equipment and truck traffic may temporarily impact views adjacent to the project area. However, short-term impacts would cease upon project completion and therefore are not considered significant. In addition, the construction process would be subject to existing City requirements relating to staging and stockpiling to ensure that impacts to scenic vistas are minimized. On a long-term operational basis, the project would not result in significant impacts to scenic vistas. As a roadway enhancement effort, the project would not include any new structures or other amenities that would substantially alter the aesthetic character of viewshed of the area. Additionally, the project would include replacement of all trees damaged or removed for construction. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. A 4.5-mile segment of SR-91 (from SR-55 to the Weir Canyon Road interchange) is an officially designated State Scenic Highway by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Additionally, SR-91, east of Weir Canyon is an eligible State Scenic Highway. Both I. AESTHETICS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?     b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic highway?     c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?     d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 20 - of these highway segments are located over 3.5 miles northeast of the project site. In addition, there are no other significant scenic resources at the project site, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, historic structures, etc. Since no state scenic highway or other scenic resources occurs in proximity to the site, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. As stated above, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to the visual character of the area during construction, since the construction process would be short-term in nature and it would be subject to City standards relating to staging and stockpiling. On a long-term operational basis, the project would not result in significant impacts to the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. As a roadway enhancement effort, the project would not include any new structures or other amenities that would substantially alter the aesthetic character of the area. Additionally, the project would replace all trees damaged or removed for construction. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not anticipated to require nighttime construction; thus, light/glare impacts related to nighttime lighting would not occur. Upon completion of the project, lighting conditions would not be significantly altered in comparison to existing conditions. Any lighting streetlights, illuminated signage, parking lot lights, etc.) to be removed by the proposed project would be replaced in a similar location, with similar lighting facilities. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 21 - a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?     b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?     c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?     d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?     e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non- forest use?     Narrative Summary: Section Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? No Impact. No land at the project site or immediate vicinity is designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Thus, the proposed roadway improvement project would not convert farmland to non-agricultural uses. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The project would not affect any land zoned for agricultural use and would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract. The project site occurs within a completely urbanized, developed area. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 22 - Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The project would not affect any land zoned for forest land, timberland, or timberland production. The project site occurs within a completely urbanized, developed area. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The project site occurs within a completely urbanized, developed area. No forest land exists within the project site or surrounding vicinity. Thus, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. No agricultural or forest land exists within the project area, and the project would not result in any impacts to such resources. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 23 - Narrative Summary: The following is a summary of an air quality study that was conducted for the proposed project. The study, in its entirety, can be found in Section 6.0, Appendices. Under CEQA, the SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District) is an expert commenting agency on air quality within its jurisdiction or impacting its jurisdiction. Under the Federal Clean Air Act, the SCAQMD has adopted Federal attainment plans for O3 and PM10. The SCAQMD reviews projects to ensure that they would not: cause or contribute to any new violation of any air quality standard; increase the frequency or severity of any existing violation of any air quality standard; or delay timely attainment of any air quality standard or any required interim emission reductions or other milestones of any Federal attainment plan. The CEQA Air Quality Handbook also provides significance thresholds for both construction and operation of projects within the SCAQMD jurisdictional boundaries. If the SCAQMD thresholds are exceeded, a potentially significant impact could result. However, ultimately the lead agency determines the thresholds of significance for impacts. If a project proposes development in excess of the established thresholds, as outlined in Table III-1, South Coast Air Quality Management District Emissions Thresholds, a significant air quality impact may occur and additional analysis is warranted to fully assess the significance of impacts. III. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?     b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?     c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?     d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?     e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 24 - Table III-1 South Coast Air Quality Management District Emissions Thresholds Phase Pollutant (lbs/day) ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Construction 75 100 550 150 150 55 Operational 55 55 550 150 150 55 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, November 1993. LOCAL CARBON MONOXIDE STANDARDS In addition, the significance of localized project impacts depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the project are above or below State and Federal CO standards, as follows:  If the project causes an exceedance of either the State one-hour or eight-hour CO concentrations, the project would be considered to have a significant local impact.  If ambient levels already exceed a State or Federal standard, then project emissions would be considered significant if they increase one-hour CO concentrations by 1.0 ppm or more, or eight-hour CO concentrations by 0.45 ppm or more. LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) were developed in response to SCAQMD Governing Boards’ Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative The SCAQMD provided the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (dated July 2008) for guidance. The LST methodology assists lead agencies in analyzing localized impacts associated with project- specific level proposed projects. The SCAQMD provides the LST lookup tables for one, two, and five acre projects emitting CO, NOX, or PM10. The LST methodology and associated mass rates are not designed to evaluate localized impacts from mobile sources traveling over the roadways. The SCAQMD recommends that any project over five acres should perform air quality dispersion modeling to assess impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. CUMULATIVE EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS The SCAQMD’s 2012 AQMP was prepared to accommodate growth, meet State and Federal air quality standards, and minimize the fiscal impact that pollution control measures have on the local economy. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, project-related emissions that fall below the established construction and operational thresholds should be considered less than significant unless there is pertinent information to the contrary. If a project exceeds these emission thresholds, the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook states that the significance of a project’s contribution to cumulative impacts should be determined based on whether the rate of growth in average daily trips exceeds the rate of growth in population. POTENTIAL AIR QUALITY IMPACTS CEQA THRESHOLDS The environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the CEQA Guidelines, as amended. The issues presented in the Initial Study Checklist have been utilized as thresholds of significance in this section. Accordingly, a project may create a significant environmental impact if it causes one or more of the following to occur: ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 25 -  Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan (refer to Section below);  Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation (refer to Section below);  Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for O3 precursors) (refer to Section below);  Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations (refer to Section below); and  Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people (refer to Section below). Based on these standards and thresholds, the effects of the proposed project have been categorized as either a “less than significant impact” or a “potentially significant impact.” Mitigation measures are recommended for potentially significant impacts. Section Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. On December 7, 2012, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the 2012 AQMP to continue the progression toward clean air and compliance with State and federal requirements. It includes a comprehensive strategy aimed at controlling pollution from all sources, including stationary sources, on- and off-road mobile sources and area sources. The 2012 AQMP proposes attainment of the federal PM2.5 standard by 2014 in the Basin through adoption of all feasible measures. The AQMP also incorporates current scientific information and meteorological air quality models. It further updates the federally approved 8-hour O3 control plan with new commitments for short-term NOX and VOC reductions. The AQMP focuses on long-term sources of emissions. The Proposed Project is not a land use development project with housing and would not generate significant new employment opportunities. The Proposed Project would not require zone changes, conditional uses, or entitlements that would modify the existing zoning or land use designations utilized to develop the AQMP emission inventories. The Proposed Project would not generate new growth or emissions that would conflict with the goals of the AQMP. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to the AQMP. Regarding short-term sources of emissions, the Proposed Project would generate fugitive dust emissions during earthwork activity. The South Coast Air Basin has been designated as State and federal nonattainment areas for PM2.5 and PM10. Fugitive dust generated during construction activity could interfere with the AQMP’s demonstration of attainment for particulate matter. The Proposed Project would implement a dust control plan through construction Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) and best management practices (BMPs) related to SCAQMD Rule 403 for the control of fugitive dust. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to consistency with the AQMP. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 26 - Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Section Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Construction Regional Emissions. Construction of the Proposed Project has the potential to create air quality impacts through the use of heavy-duty construction equipment and through vehicle trips generated by construction workers traveling to and from the project site. Fugitive dust emissions would primarily result from grading activities. NOX emissions would primarily result from the use of construction equipment. The assessment of construction air quality impacts considers each of these potential sources. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of operation and, for dust, and the prevailing weather conditions. It is mandatory for all construction projects in the Basin to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for Fugitive Dust. Specific Rule 403 requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground covers as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the project site, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Compliance with Rule 403 would reduce regional PM2.5 and PM10 emissions associated with construction activities by approximately 61 percent. Table III-2 shows the maximum daily emissions associated with construction activity. Daily construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds. Therefore, without mitigation, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to regional construction emissions. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 27 - TABLE III-2: CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS- UNMITIGATED Construction Phase Pounds Per Day VOC NOX CO SOX PM2.5 PM10 Demolition On-Site Emissions 1 10 7 <1 1 2 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 10 7 <1 1 2 Grading On-Site Emissions 3 35 22 <1 3 5 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 3 35 23 <1 3 5 Trenching On-Site Emissions 1 14 6 <1 1 1 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 14 7 <1 1 1 Building Construction On-Site Emissions 1 6 4 <1 <1 <1 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 6 4 <1 <1 <1 Paving On-Site Emissions 1 11 7 <1 1 1 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 11 8 <1 1 1 Maximum On-Site and Off-Site Total 3 35 23 <1 3 5 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD 75 100 550 150 55 150 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Maximum Localized Emissions 3 35 22 <1 3 5 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD 81 485 3 4 Exceed Threshold? No No Yes Yes Assumed a 1-acre project site and a 25-meter (82-foot) receptor distance. SOURCE: TAHA, 2014. Localized Emissions. Emissions for the localized construction air quality analysis of PM2.5, PM10, CO, and NO2 were compiled using LST methodology promulgated by the SCAQMD.1 Localized on-site emissions were calculated using similar methodology to the regional emission calculations. LSTs were developed based upon the size or total area of the emissions source, the ambient air quality in each source receptor area, and distance to the sensitive receptor. The majority of on-site emissions would be related to equipment exhaust and fugitive dust associated with earthwork. As shown in Table 3-5, daily construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD localized thresholds for PM2.5 and PM10. Therefore, without mitigation, the Proposed Project would result in a significant impact related to localized construction emissions. 1The concentrations of SO2 are not estimated because construction activities would generate a small amount of SOX emissions. No State standard exists for VOC. As such, concentrations for VOC were not estimated. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 28 - Operations Regional Emissions. Operational emissions would be emitted from vehicles accessing the intersection. In general, land development projects such as residential or commercial development result in increased vehicle trips to a site, while transportation related projects often lead to redistribution of vehicular traffic in such a way that redistribution decreases traffic congestion and increases efficiency of the transportation network. The Proposed Project is intended to increase transportation efficiency by relieving traffic congestion at the intersection of Sunkist Street and Ball Road. According to the traffic study, the Proposed Project would improve intersection level of service (LOS) from D to B for both AM and PM peak hours in 2016 despite natural growth in the number of vehicles. It is also anticipated that in 2035 the Proposed Project would still result in improved volume to capacity ratio at the intersection, although the intersection during both AM and PM peak hours would operate near its capacity in LOS F. Less wait time behind the traffic light for the build scenario in 2016 compared to the no-build scenario would result in direct reduced emissions generated by idling vehicles. Sunkist Street and Ball Road both experience truck traffic. Ball road is a designated truck route and a primary arterial roadway, and Sunkist Street is listed as a secondary arterial roadway on the County’s Master Plan of Arterial Highway. Although the Sunkist Street is not designated as truck route, the presence of heavy trucks is identified in the traffic study.2 Idling trucks are a substantial source of particulate matter emissions. According to EMFAC2011, a truck traveling 5 miles per hour generates 0.31 grams per mile of PM10, while a truck traveling 25 miles per hour generate 0.08 grams per mile of PM10. Improving the intersection efficiency would directly reduce regional passenger vehicle and truck emissions. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to regional operational emissions. Localized Emissions. CO concentrations in the future are expected to be lower than existing conditions due to stringent State and federal mandates for lowering vehicle emissions. Although traffic volumes would be higher in the future both without and with the implementation of the Proposed Project, CO emissions from mobile sources are expected to be much lower due to technological advances in vehicle emissions systems, as well as from normal turnover in the vehicle fleet. Accordingly, increases in traffic volumes are expected to be offset by increases in cleaner-running cars as a percentage of the entire vehicle fleet on the road. An exceedance of the State CO standards at an intersection is referred to as a CO hotspot. The SCAQMD recommends a CO hotspot evaluation of potential localized CO impacts when volume- to-capacity (V/C) ratios are increased by two percent at intersections with a LOS of D or worse. SCAQMD also recommends a CO hotspot evaluation when an intersection decreases in LOS by one level beginning when LOS changes from C to D. According to the traffic study, implementation of the Proposed Project improvements would provide additional traffic capacity and would reduce the volume to capacity ratio from LOS D to LOS B in 2016 during both AM and PM peak hours. Similarly in 2035 the added traffic capacity would improve the LOS from E to D for AM peak hour and would reduce the volume to capacity ratio during the PM peak hour. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to localized carbon monoxide operational emissions. 2Currently there is no restriction on passage of heavy duty trucks through the Sunkist Street. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 29 - The Proposed Project would also replace 32 commercial parking stalls of the Sunkist Plaza with 33 proposed parking stalls within a vacant area of the eastern portion of the property adjoining the existing parking lot. It is not anticipated that implementation of the Proposed Project improvements increases the utilization of the aforementioned parking stalls which are currently underutilized. In addition, the nearest sensitive receptor to the proposed parking lot is located 30 feet towards the north. The existing parking stalls within Sunkist Plaza are also located greater than 30 feet from the same sensitive receptor. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in significant CO hotspots from the proposed parking lot. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less- than-significant impact related to CO hotspots from the proposed parking lot. Mitigation Measures: The following mitigation measure applies to construction activity: AQ-1 During project construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that construction equipment meets Tier IV or better emissions standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Significance After Mitigation Impacts related to PM2.5 and PM10 construction-related regional emissions without mitigation measures were determined to be significant. Implementation of the Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce the identified impacts to below significance levels by utilizing low-emission off- road construction equipment. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce unmitigated PM2.5 and PM10 emissions by 2 ppd, to 4 and 3 ppd, respectively. These emissions would be less than the SCAQMD localized significant thresholds of 3 ppd for PM2.5 and 4 ppd for PM10. Therefore, with mitigation, the Proposed Project would result in less-than-significant impacts related to construction emission. Section Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. There is an existing regional cumulative impact associated with O3, PM10, PM2.5, Pb, and NO2 because the Basin is designated as a State and/or federal nonattainment air basin for these pollutants. However, an individual project can emit these pollutants without significantly contributing to this cumulative impact depending on the magnitude of emissions. This magnitude is determined by the project-level significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD. The operational improvements would increase the efficiency of the intersection by improving traffic operations and reducing traffic congestion during operations of the Proposed Project. The increased efficiency would inherently lower emissions generated by trucks and passenger cars during idling at the intersection and overall lowers cumulative emissions in long-term. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable increase in operational emissions. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 30 - Regarding construction emissions, the Proposed Project would exceed the project-level SCAQMD localized significance thresholds for particulate matter, and could contribute to a cumulative PM10 and/or PM2.5 impact. Therefore, without mitigation, the Proposed Project would contribute to a cumulative considerable increase in construction emissions. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-1, above. Significance After Mitigation As previously discussed, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1, maximum daily construction emissions would be less than the applicable thresholds for all criteria pollutants. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Section Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact Construction The greatest potential for TAC emissions during construction would be diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy-duty equipment operations. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are described in terms of individual cancer risk. “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk assessment methodology. The majority of heavy-duty construction equipment activity would take place over an 8-month period during site preparation activity. These short- term emissions would not substantially contribute to a significant construction health risk. No residual emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to construction TAC emissions. All types of asbestos are now considered hazardous and pose public health risks. Asbestos is the generic term for the naturally occurring fibrous (asbestiform) (NOA) varieties of six silicate material. These minerals are: tremolite (when fibrous), actinolite (when fibrous), crocidolite (fibrous riebckite), (when fibrous), amosite (fibrous cummingonite- grunerite). is the most common asbestos mineral in California and belongs to the serpentine mineral group. Asbestos also refers to an industrial product obtained by mining and processing deposits of the asbesitform mineral. Asbestos is listed as a toxic air contaminant by CARB and as a Hazardous Air Pollutant by the USEPA. Asbestos occurs naturally in surface deposits of several types of rock formations. Serpentine rock has also been used extensively as base material in the construction of new roads. Serpentinite and/or ultramafic rock are known to be present in 44 of California’s 58 counties. These rocks are particularly abundant in the counties of the Sierra Nevada foothills, the Klamath Mountains, and Coast Ranges. Exposure and disturbance of rock and soil that contains asbestos can result in the release of fibers to the air and consequent exposure to the public. Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology has published location guide ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 31 - maps for areas in California that more likely contain NOA-containing rock formation. 3 The Project site is not located within the areas where occurrences of asbestos may be an issue. In addition, USEPA has determined that, severely damaged, otherwise non-friable materials can release significant amounts of asbestos fibers. Asbestos has been banned from many building materials under the Toxic Substances Control Act, the CAA, and the Consumer Product Safety Act. In addition, the project would not demolish or disturb existing buildings or other facilities that may have asbestos. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to airborne asbestos during construction. Operations The SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.4 Improvements of the Proposed Project would reduce the traffic congestion by mobilizing the traffic more efficiently. Reducing the wait time and idling would directly decrease overall TAC operational emissions by reducing idling emissions. Based on the reduced strength of TAC sources, the Proposed Project would not warrant the need for a health risk assessment associated with on-site activities, and potential TAC impacts are expected to be less than significant. The CARB has published guidance for locating new sensitive receptors residences) out of harm’s way with respect to nearby sources of air pollution.5 Although the Proposed Project would not construct a new receptor, it would widen the roadway towards residences. The CARB recommends against locating new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of an urban road with 100,000 vehicles per day. The average daily traffic along the four segments that comprise the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection range from 12,012 to 51,164 vehicles. These volumes are well below the CARB recommendations of locating residences adjacent to roadways, and the intersection activity would not generate significant exposure from automobile exhaust. In addition, Improvements of the Proposed Project are intended to increase efficiency and relieve traffic congestion. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less-than-significant impact related to TACs. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Section Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant. Construction Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. Odors from these sources would be localized and generally confined to the immediate area surrounding the project site. The Proposed Project would utilize typical construction techniques, and the odors would be typical of most construction sites and 3A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos, ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/ofr/ofr_2000-019.pdf, accessed May 5, 2014. 4SCAQMD, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. 5CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 32 - temporary in nature. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to construction odors. Operations According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses and industrial operations that are associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies and fiberglass molding. The improvements of the Proposed Project would be performed under the category of transportation development; this type of use is not typically associated with odor complaints. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to operational odors. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?     b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?     c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?     d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?     e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 33 - f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?     Section Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. A biological assessment (Harmsworth Associates, November 15, 2010) was conducted at the site on November 9, 2010 and concluded that the project area is completely urbanized and developed with roadway, residential, retail/commercial, and office uses. In addition, this assessment also concluded that there are no active bird nests at the site. The project site and surrounding areas have been completely disturbed by grading and development. The proposed project would involve improvements to the existing Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection and would not have the potential to affect any sensitive biological species. In addition, the assessment concluded that the vegetation within the project area is limited to ornamental landscaping and is not expected to provide suitable habitat for sensitive plants or animals. As such, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. The biological assessment, in its entirety, can be found in Section 6.0 of the appendices. Although the project site‘s vegetation is limited to ornamental landscaping, these ornamental trees have the potential to be used by nesting raptors. State regulations prohibit activities that “take, possess or destroy” any raptor nest or egg (CDFG Code 3503, 3503.5, and 3513). Therefore, if construction is initiated during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30), the project has the potential to impact nesting raptors, thus resulting in a significant impact. This impact would be reduced to a level considered less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM B-1. Mitigation Measure: B-1 Prior to construction, the Public Works Department shall ensure that a survey for active nests occurs 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 through June 30) and within 500 feet of any trees on the project site suitable for nesting. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. Section Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 34 - Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.IV(a), above. The developed and disturbed nature of the project site is not expected to support riparian habitat or other sensitive communities. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Responses 4.IV(a) and 4.IV.(b), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project site is completely developed, within an urbanized area. The project site does not currently serve as a wildlife corridor for native resident migratory fish or wildlife species. Thus, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the project (including demolition and construction activities) will remove approximately 20 ornamental trees. The project will comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code 13.12.060 related to replacement of removed street trees. It should be noted at this location of the City, there are no other applicable tree preservation policies or ordinances related to the protection of biological resources because the project is not located within the Scenic Corridor Overlay area. Therefore, no impacts would occur and thus no mitigation. It should be noted the project will include the installation of approximately 20 new ornamental trees. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other local, regional, or state plan area. The nearest designated area is the Orange County Central/Coastal Natural Communities Conservation Plan Sub-region (NCCP) and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), which is generally located south of SR-91 and east of SR-55. Thus, impacts in this regard would not occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 35 - V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and/or identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (July 20, 1999)?     b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines?     c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?     d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?     Section Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would consist of roadway improvements at the Ball Road/Sunkist Avenue intersection. Although the project would require ROW acquisition, it would not involve any alterations to existing structures immediately surrounding the project site. In addition, none of the structures surrounding the project site have Federal, State, or local historical designations. As such, impacts to historical resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. According to the City’s General Plan EIR, archaeological sites within the City are often located along creek areas, ridgelines, and vistas. Many of these types of landforms are located within the Hill and Canyon Area of the City, and one major cultural resource site (CA-Ora-303) has been identified and registered. This site consists of a series of small north-facing rock shelters adjacent to SR-91. The proposed project site has been completely disturbed by development, and is located within an urbanized area. As such, any archaeological which may have existed in the project area have likely been disturbed. Notwithstanding, ground-disturbing activities, such as grading or excavation, could unearth undocumented archaeological resources. Potential impacts to archaeological resources attributed to the proposed project would be considered less than ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 36 - significant with adherence to the regulatory requirements and recommended mitigation, which provides instructions in the event a material of potential cultural significance is uncovered. Mitigation Measure: CUL-1 In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation and grading activities associated with the project, the contractor shall cease all earth- disturbing activities within a 100-meter radius of the area of discovery and shall retain a qualified archaeologist, as determined by the Public Works Department, to evaluate the significance of the finding and appropriate course of action. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. Section Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. Paleontological sites are those areas that show evidence of pre-human activity. Often they are simply small outcroppings visible on the surface or sites encountered during grading. While the sites are important indications, it is the geologic formations that are the most important since they may contain important fossils. According to the City’s General Plan EIR, the majority of paleontological resources within the City exist in the Hill and Canyon Areas, northeast of the project site. The proposed project site has been completely disturbed by development, and is located within an urbanized area. As such, any paleontological resources which may have existed in the project area have likely been disturbed. Notwithstanding, ground-disturbing activities, such as grading or excavation, could unearth undocumented paleontological resources. Potential impacts to paleontological resources attributed to the proposed project would be considered less than significant with adherence to the regulatory requirements and recommended mitigation, which provides instructions in the event a material of potential cultural significance is uncovered. Mitigation Measure: CUL-2 In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation and grading activities associated with the project, the contractor shall cease all earth- disturbing activities within a 100-meter radius of the area of discovery and shall retain a qualified paleontologist that is approved by the Public Works Department to evaluate the significance of the finding and appropriate course of action. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. Section Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact. No conditions exist that suggest human remains are likely to be found beneath the project site. Due to the level of past disturbance in the project area, it is not anticipated that human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, would be encountered during earth removal or disturbance activities. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 37 - However, in the unexpected event human remains are found, those remains would require proper treatment, in accordance with applicable laws. The California Public Resources Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5-7055 describe the general provisions regarding human remains, including the requirements if any human remains are accidentally discovered during excavation of a site. As required by State law, the requirements and procedures set forth in Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code would be implemented, including notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission and consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the “most likely descendant.” If human remains are found during excavation, excavation must stop in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overly adjacent remains until the County coroner has been called out, and the remains have been investigated and appropriate recommendations have been made for the treatment and disposition of the remains. Following compliance with State regulations, which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered, impacts in this regard would be considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.     ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?     iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?     iv) Landslides?     b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?     c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?     d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 38 - e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?     Section Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No Impact. Figure 5.5-1, Generalized Geologic Map, of the General Plan EIR illustrates the locations of active and potentially active faults in the City. As illustrated on Figure 5.5-1, there are no known active earthquake faults or Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones that traverse the City. In addition, the proposed project would not include any new structures or alter any existing structures. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact. While no active or potentially active faults traverse the City, the entire southern California region is considered to be seismically active. The City is located between two major active fault zones; the Newport-Inglewood fault zone and the Whittier- Elsinore fault zone. The Newport-Inglewood fault passes within seven miles of the western limits of the City. It is considered capable of generating an earthquake with a magnitude of 6.9 on the Richter scale. The Whittier-Elsinore fault passes within one mile of the northeastern end of the City and is capable of generating an earthquake with a magnitude of 6.8 on the Richter scale. The proposed project would include roadway expansion improvements, and would not include any new structures or alter any existing structures on or surrounding the project site. The proposed project would allow for increased traffic efficiency at the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. Implementation of the project is not expected to result in substantial adverse effects related to seismic shaking. Thus, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact. Areas considered to have a potential for liquefaction are illustrated on Figure 5.5-3, Seismic and Geologic Hazards, of the General Plan EIR. As shown in Figure 5.5-3, the project site is located outside of the identified liquefaction potential boundary. In addition, the proposed project would only include roadway improvements, and does not propose any new structures or alteration of existing structures adjacent to the project site. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 39 - Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. iv. Landslides? No Impact. Areas considered to have a potential for landslides are shown on Figure 5.5-3, Seismic and Geologic Hazards, of the City’s General Plan EIR. As shown in Figure 5.5-3, the project site is situated outside of the identified landslide hazard boundary. Landslide-prone areas are limited to the eastern portion of the City. Given the site’s flat topography and lack of features capable of producing a landslide, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not require substantial grading or excavation, since it would only include roadway widening improvements. Ground disturbance would only occur along the edges of Ball Road and Sunkist Street where widening would occur. Given the short-term nature of construction and relatively minor amount of area to be disturbed, it is not expected that the project would result in substantial soil erosion of loss of topsoil. In addition, the project would be subject to the City’s standard requirements for construction- related erosion control measures. Thus, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in an on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact. As described above in Response 4.VI(a), and as shown in Figures 5.5-1 and 5.5-3 of the City’s General Plan EIR, the proposed project site is located outside of identified geologic hazard zones (including landslide, earthquake fault, and liquefaction). In addition, the proposed project would result in improvements to the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. These improvements would not introduce new structures to the site, nor would they alter any existing structures adjacent to the project area. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the California Building Code (2001), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the City’s General Plan EIR, expansiveness refers to the potential to swell and shrink with repeated cycles of wetting and drying and is a common feature of fine-grained clayey soils. This wetting and drying causes damage due to differential settlement within buildings and other improvements. Soils observed in the Hill and Canyon Area (northeast of the project area) are predominately classified in the “Medium” to “High” range, with small areas associated with “Low” expansion potential. Soils observed and encountered throughout the remainder of the City range from “Low” to “High” in expansion potential. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 40 - The proposed project area has been completely impacted by development, and any risks related to expansive soils have been mitigated as part of historical development. In addition, the proposed project would not introduce any new structures or alter any existing structures adjacent to the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. Due to the limited scope and nature of the proposed project, impacts related to expansive soils are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The proposed project does not involve the use or alteration of any septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?     b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?     Narrative Summary: Greenhouse Gases and the Greenhouse Effect GHG emissions refer to a group of emissions that affect global climate conditions. Simply put, the greenhouse effect compares the Earth and the atmosphere surrounding it to a greenhouse with glass panes. The glass panes in a greenhouse let heat from sunlight in and reduce the amount of heat that escapes. GHGs, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) keep the average surface temperature of the Earth close to 60°F. Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth would be a frozen globe with an average surface temperature of about 5°F. Types of Greenhouse Gases In addition to CO2, CH4, and N2O, GHGs include hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride, and water vapor. According to a Climate Action Team Report prepared for the State Governor and Legislature, CO2 is the most abundant pollutant that contributes to climate change through fossil fuel combustion. CO2 comprised 81 percent of the total GHG emissions in ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 41 - California in 2002 and non-fossil fuel CO2 comprised 2.3 percent. The other GHGs are less abundant but have higher global warming potential than CO2. To account for this higher potential, emissions of other GHGs are frequently expressed in the equivalent mass of CO2, denoted as CO2e. CO2e is a measurement used to account for the fact that different GHGs have different potential to retain infrared radiation in the atmosphere and contribute to the greenhouse effect. This potential, known as the global warming potential (GWP) of a GHG, is dependent on the lifetime, or persistence, of the gas molecule in the atmosphere. For example, one ton of CH4 has the same contribution to the greenhouse effect as approximately 23 tons of CO2. Therefore, CH4 is a much more potent GHG than CO2. Expressing emissions in CO2e takes the contributions of all GHG emissions to the greenhouse effect and converts them to a single unit equivalent to the effect that would occur if only CO2 were being emitted. The CO2e of CH4 and N2O represented 6.4 and 6.8 percent, respectively, of the 2002 California GHG emissions. Other high global warming potential gases represented 3.5 percent of these emissions. In addition, there are a number of man-made pollutants, such as CO, NOX, non- methane VOC, and SO2, that have indirect effects on terrestrial or solar radiation absorption by influencing the formation or destruction of other climate change emissions. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the transportation, industrial/manufacturing, utility, residential, commercial and agricultural sectors. In California, the transportation sector is the largest emitter of GHGs, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 are by products of fossil fuel combustion. CH4, a highly potent GHG, results from off-gassing (the release of chemicals from nonmetallic substances under ambient or greater pressure conditions) is largely associated with agricultural practices and landfills. N2O is also largely attributable to agricultural practices and soil management. CO2 sinks, or reservoirs, include vegetation and the ocean, which absorb CO2 through sequestration and dissolution, respectively, two of the most common processes of CO2 sequestration. California produced 474 million gross metric tons (MMT) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) averaged over the period from 2002 to 2004. Combustion of fossil fuel in the transportation sector was the single largest source of California’s GHG emissions in 2002 to 2004, accounting for 38 percent of total GHG emissions in the State. This sector was followed by the electric power sector (including both in-State and out-of-State sources) (18 percent) and the industrial sector (21 percent). REGULATORY SETTING Federal The USEPA is the federal agency responsible for implementing the CAA. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its decision in Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al. ([2007] 549 U.S. 05-1120), issued on April 2, 2007, that CO2 is an air pollutant as defined under the CAA, and that USEPA has the authority to regulate emissions of GHGs. In response to the mounting issue of climate change, USEPA has taken actions to regulate, monitor, and potentially reduce GHG emissions. State ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 42 - The following discussion includes State policies applicable to the proposed residential development. Executive Order S-3-05. On June 1, 2005, E.O. S-3-05 set the following GHG emission reduction targets: by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The E.O. calls for the Secretary of California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) to be responsible for coordination of State agencies and progress reporting. A recent California Energy Commission report concludes, however, that the primary strategies to achieve this target should be major “decarbonization” of electricity supplies and fuels, and major improvements in energy efficiency.  In response to the E.O., the Secretary of the Cal/EPA created the Climate Action Team (CAT), including the Secretaries of the Natural Resources Agency, and the Department of Food and Agriculture, and the Chairs of the Air Resources Board, Energy Commission, and Public Utilities Commission. The original mandate for the CAT was to develop proposed measures to meet the emission reduction targets set forth in the E.O. The CAT has since expanded and currently has members from 18 State agencies and departments. The CAT also has ten working groups which coordinate policies among their members. The working groups and their major areas of focus are:  Agriculture: Focusing on opportunities for agriculture to reduce GHG emissions through efficiency improvements and alternative energy projects, while adapting agricultural systems to climate change;  Biodiversity: Designing policies to protect species and natural habitats from the effects of climate change;  Energy: Reducing GHG emissions through extensive energy efficiency policies and renewable energy generation;  Forestry: Coupling GHG mitigation efforts with climate change adaptation related to forest preservation and resilience, waste to energy programs and forest offset protocols;  Land Use and Infrastructure: Linking land use and infrastructure planning to efforts to reduce GHG from vehicles and adaptation to changing climatic conditions;  Oceans and Coastal: Evaluating the effects sea level rise and changes in coastal storm patterns on human and natural systems in California;  Public Health: Evaluating the effects of GHG mitigation policies on public health and adapting public health systems to cope with changing climatic conditions;  Research: Coordinating research concerning impacts of and responses to climate change in California;  State Government: Evaluating and implementing strategies to reduce GHG emissions resulting from State government operations; and  Water: Reducing GHG impacts associated with the State’s water systems and exploring strategies to protect water distribution and flood protection infrastructure. The CAT is responsible for preparing reports that summarize the State’s progress in reducing GHG emissions. The most recent CAT Report was published in December 2010. The CAT Report discusses mitigation and adaptation strategies, State research programs, policy development, and future efforts. Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), California Global Warming Solutions Act. In September 2006, the State passed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, also known as AB 32, ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 43 - into law. AB 32 focuses on reducing GHG emissions in California, and requires the CARB to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to Statewide levels in 1990 by 2020. To achieve this goal, AB 32 mandated that the CARB establish a quantified emissions cap, institute a schedule to meet the cap, implement regulations to reduce Statewide GHG emissions from stationary sources, and develop tracking, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that reductions are achieved. Because the intent of AB 32 is to limit 2020 emissions to the equivalent of 1990, the regulations affect many existing sources of GHG emissions and not just new general development projects. Senate Bill (SB) 1368, a companion bill to AB 32, requires the California Public Utilities Commission and the California Energy Commission to establish GHG emission performance standards for the generation of electricity. These standards also apply to power that is generated outside of California and imported into the State. AB 32 charges CARB with the responsibility to monitor and regulate sources of GHG emissions in order to reduce those emissions. On June 1, 2007, CARB adopted three discrete early action measures to reduce GHG emissions. These measures involved complying with a low carbon fuel standard, reducing refrigerant loss from motor vehicle air conditioning maintenance, and increasing methane capture from landfills. On October 25, 2007, CARB tripled the set of previously approved early action measures. The approved measures include improving truck efficiency reducing aerodynamic drag), electrifying port equipment, reducing perfluorocarbons from the semiconductor industry, reducing propellants in consumer products, promoting proper tire inflation in vehicles, and reducing sulfur hexaflouride emission from the non-electricity sector. The CARB initially determined that the total Statewide aggregated GHG 1990 emissions level and 2020 emissions limit was 427 million metric tons of CO2e. Based on the estimated GHG emissions inventory, the State was mandated to reduce GHG emissions to 174 million metric tons by 2020. AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan. The CARB AB 32 Scoping Plan contains the main strategies to achieve the 2020 emissions cap. The Scoping Plan was developed by the CARB with input from the CAT and included a comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall carbon emissions in California, improve the environment, reduce oil dependency, diversify energy sources, and enhance public health while creating new jobs and improving the State economy. The GHG reduction strategies contained in the Scoping Plan include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non-monetary incentives, voluntary actions, and market-based mechanisms such as a cap-and-trade system. Key approaches for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 include:  Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance standards;  Achieving a Statewide renewable electricity standard of 33 percent;  Developing a California cap-and-trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative partner programs to create a regional market system;  Establishing targets for transportation-related GHG emissions for regions throughout California, and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets; and  Adopting and implementing measures to reduce transportation sector emissions, including California’s clean car standards and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. In February 2014, CARB released the Proposed First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan. This Update identifies the next steps for California’s leadership on climate change. The ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 44 - first Update to the initial AB 32 Scoping Plan describes progress made to meet the near-term objectives of AB 32 and defines California’s climate change priorities and activities for the next several years. It also frames activities and issues facing the State as it develops an integrated framework for achieving both air quality and climate goals in California beyond 2020. Specifically, the Update covers a range of topics:  An update of the latest scientific findings related to climate change and its impacts, including short-lived climate pollutants.  A review of progress-to-date, including an update of Scoping Plan measures and other State, federal, and local efforts to reduce GHG emissions in California.  Potential technologically feasible and cost-effective actions to further reduce GHG emissions by 2020.  Recommendations for establishing a mid-term emissions limit that aligns with the State’s long-term goal of an emissions limit 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.  Sector-specific discussions covering issues, technologies, needs, and ongoing State activities to significantly reduce emissions throughout California’s economy through 2050. As discussed above, in December 2007, CARB approved a total statewide GHG 1990 emissions level and 2020 emissions limit of 427 million metric tons of CO2e. As part of the Update, CARB is proposing to revise the 2020 Statewide limit to 431 million metric tons of CO2e, an approximately one percent increase from the original estimate. The 2020 business-as- usual (BAU) forecast in the Update is 509 million metric tons of CO2e. The State would need to reduce those emissions by 15 percent to meet the 431 million metric tons of CO2e 2020 limit. CARB has also developed the GHG mandatory reporting regulation, which required reporting beginning on January 1, 2008 pursuant to requirements of AB 32. The regulations require reporting for certain types of facilities that make up the bulk of the stationary source emissions in California. The regulation language identifies major facilities as those that generate more than 25,000 metric tons of CO2 per year. Cement plants, oil refineries, electric generating facilities/providers, co- generation facilities, and hydrogen plants and other stationary combustion sources that emit more than 25,000 metric tons of CO2 per year, make up 94 percent of the point source CO2 emissions in California. CEQA Guidelines Amendments. California SB 97 required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop CEQA Guidelines “for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions or the effects of greenhouse gas emissions.” The CEQA Guidelines amendments provided guidance to public agencies regarding the analysis and mitigation of the effects of GHG emissions in CEQA documents. Noteworthy revisions to the CEQA Guidelines included:  Lead agencies should quantify all relevant GHG emissions and consider the full range of project features that may increase or decrease GHG emissions as compared to the existing setting;  Consistency with the CARB Scoping Plan is not a sufficient basis to determine that a project’s GHG emissions would not be cumulatively considerable;  A lead agency may appropriately look to thresholds developed by other public agencies, including the CARB’s recommended CEQA thresholds;  To qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be identified and incorporated into the project. General compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation; ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 45 -  The effects of GHG emissions are cumulative and should be analyzed in the context of CEQA’s requirements for cumulative impact analysis; and  Given that impacts resulting from GHG emissions are cumulative, significant advantages may result from analyzing such impacts on a programmatic level. If analyzed properly, later projects may tier, incorporate by reference, or otherwise rely on the programmatic analysis. Senate Bill 375. SB 375, adopted in September 30, 2008, provides a means for achieving AB 32 goals through the reduction in emissions of cars and light trucks. SB 375 requires new Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) to include Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCSs). This legislation also allows the development of an Alternative Planning Strategy (APS) if the targets cannot be feasibly met through an SCS. The APS is not included as part of the RTP. In adopting SB 375, the Legislature expressly found that improved land use and transportation systems are needed in order to achieve the GHG emissions reduction target of AB 32. Further, the staff analysis for the bill prepared for the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee’s August 29, 2008 hearing on SB 375 began with the following statement: “According to the author, this bill will help implement AB 32 by aligning planning for housing, land use, transportation and GHG emissions for the 17 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) in the State.” The CARB is required to provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. The CARB is also charged with reviewing each SCS or APS for consistency with its assigned GHG emission reduction targets. In compliance with SB 375, the SCAG approved the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS, which is further discussed below under regional regulations. Executive Order S-13-08. Signed on November 14, 2008, E.O. S-13-08 directed California to develop methods for adapting to climate change through preparation of a Statewide plan. The E.O. directed OPR, in cooperation with the CRA, to provide land use planning guidance related to sea level rise and other climate change impacts. The order also directed the CRA to develop a State Climate Adaptation Strategy and to convene an independent panel to complete the first California Sea Level Rise Assessment Report. The CRA released the Third Climate Change Assessment in 2009 and is in the process of updating the 2009 California Climate Adaption Strategy. California Air Resource Board (CARB) Guidance. The CARB has published draft guidance for setting interim GHG significance thresholds (October 24, 2008). The guidance is the first step toward developing the recommended Statewide interim thresholds of significance for GHG emissions that may be adopted by local agencies for their own use. The guidance does not attempt to address every type of project that may be subject to CEQA, but instead focuses on common project types that are responsible for substantial GHG emissions industrial, residential, and commercial projects). The CARB believes that thresholds in these important sectors will advance climate objectives, streamline project review, and encourage consistency and uniformity in the CEQA analysis of GHG emissions throughout the State. Regional ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 46 - Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) 2012-2035 RTP/SCS. SCAG completed the RTP/SCS, which includes a strong commitment to reduce regional GHG emissions. Goals and policies included in the RTP/SCS are generally related to transportation and consist of adding density in proximity to transit stations, mixed-use development and encouraging active transportation non-motorized transportation such as bicycling). South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD adopted a “Policy on Global Warming and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion” on April 6, 1990. The policy commits the SCAQMD to consider global impacts in rulemaking and in drafting revisions to the AQMP. In March 1992, the SCAQMD Governing Board reaffirmed this policy and adopted amendments to the policy. SCAQMD released draft guidance regarding interim CEQA GHG significance thresholds in 2008. The SCAQMD proposed the use of a percent emission reduction target 30 percent) to determine significance for commercial/residential projects that emit greater than 3,000 metric tons per year. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the staff proposal for an interim GHG significance threshold for stationary source/industrial projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. However, SCAQMD has yet to adopt a GHG significance threshold for land use development projects residential/commercial projects) and has formed a GHG Significance Threshold Working Group to further evaluate potential GHG significance thresholds. SCAQMD has convened a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group to provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents. Members of the working group include government agencies implementing CEQA and representatives from various stakeholder groups that will provide input to the SCAQMD staff on developing CEQA GHG significance thresholds. The working group is currently discussing multiple methodologies for determining project significance. These methodologies include categorical exemptions, consistency with regional GHG budgets in approved plans, a numerical threshold, performance standards, and emissions offsets. EXISTING SETTING The primary effect of rising global concentrations of atmospheric GHG levels is a rise in the average global temperature of approximately 0.2 degrees Celsius per decade, determined from meteorological measurements worldwide between 1990 and 2005. Climate change modeling using 2000 emission rates shows that further warming is likely to occur given the expected rise in global atmospheric GHG concentrations from innumerable sources of GHG emissions worldwide, which would induce further changes in the global climate system during the current century.6 Adverse impacts from global climate change worldwide and in California include:  Declining sea ice and mountain snow peak levels, thereby increasing sea levels and sea surface evaporation rates with a corresponding increase in atmospheric water vapor due to the atmosphere’s ability to hold more water vapor at higher temperatures;7  Rising average global sea levels primarily due to thermal expansion and the melting of glaciers, ice caps, and the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets;8 6USEPA, Draft Endangerment Finding, 74 Fed. Reg. 18886, 18904, April 24, 2009. 7Ibid. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 47 -  Changing weather patterns, including changes to precipitation, ocean salinity, and wind patterns, and more energetic aspects of extreme weather including droughts, heavy precipitation, heat waves, extreme cold, and the intensity of tropical cyclones;9  Declining Sierra Mountains snowpack levels, which account for approximately half of the surface water storage in California, by 70 percent to as much as 90 percent over the next 100 years;10  Increasing the number of days conducive to ozone formation clear days with intense sun light) by 25 to 85 percent (depending on the future temperature scenario) in high O3 areas located in the Southern California area and the San Joaquin Valley by the end of the 21st Century;11 and  Increasing the potential for erosion of California’s coastlines and seawater intrusion into the Sacramento Delta and associated levee systems due to the rise in sea level.12 Scientific understanding of the fundamental processes responsible for global climate change has improved over the past decade. However, there remain significant scientific uncertainties, for example, in predictions of local effects of climate change, occurrence of extreme weather events, and effects of aerosols, changes in clouds, shifts in the intensity and distribution of precipitation, and changes in oceanic circulation. Due to the complexity of the climate system, the uncertainty surrounding the implications of climate change may never be completely eliminated. Because of these uncertainties, there continues to be significant debate as to the extent to which increased concentrations of GHGs have caused or will cause climate change, and with respect to the appropriate actions to limit and/or respond to climate change. In addition, it may not be possible to link specific development projects to future specific climate change impacts, though estimating project-specific impacts is possible. California is the fifteenth largest emitter of GHG on the planet, representing about two percent of the worldwide emissions.13 Table VII-1 shows the California GHG emissions inventory for years 2002 to 2011. Statewide GHG emissions decreased in 2009 due to a noticeable drop in on-road transportation, electricity generation, and industrial emissions. 8Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change, 2007. 9Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change, 2007 10Cal/EPA, Climate Action Team, Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature, 2006. 11Ibid. 12Ibid. 13CARB, Climate Change Scoping Plan, December 2008. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 48 - TABLE VII-1: CALIFORNIA GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Sector CO2e Emissions (million metric tons) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Transportation 184 184 187 189 189 189 177 172 171 168 Electric Power (In-State) 50 48 49 45 50 54 54 56 47 40 Electric Power (Imports) 59 65 66 63 55 60 66 48 44 47 Commercial and Residential 43 42 44 43 43 44 45 44 45 45 Industrial 94 93 96 94 92 89 89 84 91 93 Recycling and Waste 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 High GWP 7 8 9 9 10 11 11 12 14 15 Agriculture 32 33 33 33 34 33 34 32 32 32 Emissions Total 476 479 489 482 479 486 483 455 450 448 SOURCE: CARB, California Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2000-2011, August 1, 2013. METHODOLOGY AND SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA Methodology GHG emissions were estimated using spreadsheet methodology. The emission rates were obtained from the Appendix D of the CalEEMod manual. CalEEMod is a Statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and GHG emissions associated with both construction and operational from a variety of land use projects. The model quantifies direct emissions from construction and operation (including vehicle use), as well as indirect emissions, such as GHG emissions from energy use, solid waste disposal, vegetation planting and/or removal, and water use. Significance Criteria In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project would have a significant impact related to air quality if it would:  Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; and/or  Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The CEQA Guidelines require Lead Agencies to adopt GHG threshold of significance. When adopting these thresholds, the amended Guideline allows lead agencies to consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided that the thresholds are supported by substantial evidence, and/or to develop their own significance threshold. Neither the City of Anaheim nor the SCAQMD have formally adopted GHG thresholds of significance for CEQA. As such, this assessment follows guidance from the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) CEQA and Climate Change White Paper (January 2008). CAPCOA conducted an analysis of various approaches and significance thresholds, ranging from a zero threshold (all projects are cumulatively considerable) to a high ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 49 - of 40,000 to 50,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. For example, an approach assuming a zero threshold and compliance with AB 32 2020 targets would require all discretionary projects to achieve a 33 percent reduction from projected “business-as-usual” emissions to be considered less than significant. A zero threshold approach could be considered on the basis that climate change is a global phenomenon, and not controlling small source emissions would potentially neglect a major portion of the GHG inventory. However, the CEQA Guidelines also recognize that there may be a point where a project’s contribution, although above zero, would not be a considerable contribution to the cumulative impact (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15130[a]). Therefore, a threshold of greater than zero is considered more appropriate for the analysis of GHG emissions under CEQA. Another method would use a quantitative threshold of greater than 900 metric tons CO2e per year based on a market capture approach that requires mitigation for greater than 90 percent of likely future discretionary development. Another potential threshold would be the 10,000 metric tons standard used by the Market Advisory Committee for inclusion in a GHG Cap and Trade System in California. The basic concepts for the various approaches suggested by CAPCOA are used herein to determine whether or not the Proposed Project’s GHG emissions are “cumulatively considerable.” The most conservative lowest) thresholds, suggested by CAPCOA, would not be appropriate for the Proposed Project given that it is located in a highly-urbanized community. Similarly, the 900-metric ton threshold was also determined to be too conservative for general development in the Basin. Consequently, the threshold of 10,000 metric tons of CO2e per year is used as a quantitative benchmark for significance in the Basin. Section Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would not generate new vehicle trips and would not construct new land uses that would generate GHG emissions. Therefore, this analysis focuses on construction emissions. Emissions would be generated by equipment exhaust, truck trips, and worker commute trips. Based on SCAQMD guidance, construction emissions were amortized over a 30-year span. As shown in Table Vii-2, GHG emissions would be 57 metric tons per year. GHG emissions would be less than the 10,000 metric tons of CO2e per year quantitative significance threshold. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to GHG emissions. TABLE VII-2: ESTIMATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Construction Emissions Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (Metric Tons per Year) Construction Emissions 57 Construction Emissions Amortized over 30 years 2 Regional Significance Threshold 10,000 Exceed Threshold? No SOURCE: TAHA, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 50 - Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Section Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact. The primary State and regional plans for reducing GHG emissions include the AB 32 Scoping Plan prepared by CARB and the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS prepared by SCAG. The Proposed Project would facilitate the movement of vehicles through the intersection by reducing congestion. The roadway widening project would not interfere with goals or policies in either of these comments, most of which are designed to reduce emissions either from land use development or large-scale industry electricity generation). Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to consistency with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?     b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?     c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?     d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 51 - e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?     f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?     g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?     h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?     Narrative Summary: The following is a summary of a hazardous waste study that was conducted for the proposed project. The study, in its entirety, can be found in Section 6.0, Appendices. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines contains analysis guidelines related to the assessment of hazardous materials impacts. As stated in Appendix G, a project would create a significant environmental impact if it would:  Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Be located within an airport land use plan that would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area (refer to Impact Statement Section below); ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 52 -  Within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop that would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan (refer to Impact Statement Section below); or  Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires (refer to Impact Statement Section below). Based on these standards and thresholds, the effects of the proposed project have been categorized as either a “less than significant impact” or a “potentially significant impact.” Mitigation measures are recommended for potentially significant impacts. Section Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. The project proposes roadway improvements to the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, and would not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of substantial quantities of hazardous materials. The only uses on-site that may require the use of hazardous materials would be a new landscaped median along Ball Road. This new landscaped area would require the use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers for regular maintenance, but these chemicals would be utilized periodically and in small quantities. Thus, implementation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Section Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is unlikely to result in a release of hazardous materials into the environment. However, during the short-term period of project construction, there is a possibility of accidental release of hazardous substances such as petroleum-based fuels or hydraulic fluid used for construction equipment. The level of risk associated with the accidental release of hazardous substances is not considered significant due to the small volume and low concentration of hazardous materials utilized during construction. The construction contractor would be required to use standard construction controls and safety procedures that would avoid and minimize the potential for accidental release of such substances into the environment. Standard construction practices would be observed such that any materials released are appropriately contained and remediated as required by local, State, and Federal law. Also, excavation activities within the vicinity of the off-site ARCO gasoline station could result in the exposure of construction workers to hazardous materials in the subsurface. The project would be required to include a Worker Safety Plan for construction worker employees (Mitigation Measure HAZ-1). The Worker Safety Plan would provide information regarding ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 53 - potential chemical and physical hazards that may exist at the site as a result of the ARCO gasoline station and describes safety measures to be followed by field personnel during excavation activities. With implementation of the recommended Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. The off-site dry cleaner facility located at 2515 E. Ball Road (Westway Cleaners) is located within 40 feet up-gradient of the proposed improvements. Also, the enclosed dumpster that serves these strip-mall commercial uses (including the Westway Cleaners) is located within 40- feet cross-gradient of the proposed parking lot area and 100 feet up-gradient of other on-site improvement areas. This reported dry cleaner facility has a moderate to high likelihood of releasing hazardous materials into the groundwater. Due to the high likelihood of a release to the groundwater and the close proximity of this facility from the project site, it is anticipated that contaminated groundwater may underlie the project site as a result of the Westway Cleaners facility. Based on available records from the for the ARCO gasoline station (located approximately 300 feet west of this dry cleaner facility), groundwater has fluctuated from approximately 69 to 96 feet below ground surface (bgs) or more. Due to the nature of the proposed improvements roadway widening improvements and paving of a parking lot), groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during construction activities. Therefore, construction workers are not anticipated to be exposed to groundwater underlying the project site and impacts in this regard are less than significant. Long-term operations at the project site would not result in the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; refer to Impact Statement HAZ-1, above. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: HAZ-1 The project shall include a Worker Safety Plan for construction worker employees. The Worker Safety Plan shall be prepared by a qualified Phase II/Site Characterization Specialist and approved by the Director of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. The Worker Safety Plan shall include information regarding potential chemical and physical hazards that may exist at the site as a result of the ARCO gasoline station located at 2445 E. Ball Road and describe safety measures to be followed by field personnel during clearing and excavation activities. Section Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. Katella High School is situated approximately one-quarter mile northwest of the proposed project site. As stated in Impact Statements Sections and above, the proposed project would not result in significant risks related to the use or handling of hazardous materials upon compliance with standard construction practices and local, State, and Federal law. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 54 - Section Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the State Water Resources Board (SWRB) to compile and update a regulatory sites listing (per the criteria of the Section). Also, the State Department of Health Services is required to compile and update as appropriate, a list of all public drinking water wells that contain detectable levels of organic contaminants and that are subject to water analysis pursuant to Section 116395 of the Health and Safety Code. Section 65962.5 also requires the local enforcement agency, as designated pursuant to Section 18051 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, to compile as appropriate, a list of all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is a known migration of hazardous waste. As part of this analysis, records have been obtained by EDR (which includes databases maintained by the DTSC, State Department of Health Services, and other local enforcement agencies pertaining to solid waste disposal facilities), as well as the SWRB. The lists, which were reviewed, identified no regulatory sites within the boundaries of the project site. No known corrective action, restoration, or remediation has been planned, is currently taking place, or has been completed on the project site. The project site has not been under investigation for violation of any environmental laws, regulations, or standards, as identified in the databases reported by EDR. However, the off-site ARCO gasoline station is listed by the SWRB (under the Santa Ana and the dry cleaners facility, which is listed by the DTSC. The proposed project would require the acquisition of land associated with these two properties. Refer to Impact Statement Section above, with regard to project impacts as a result of the off-site ARCO gasoline station and dry cleaner facility. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts pertaining to these regulatory properties would be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Section(e): For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Less Than Significant Impact. There is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within City boundaries, and the project site is not located within any airport land use plan. Fullerton Municipal Airport is situated approximately seven miles northeast of the site, and the Joint Forces Training Base (JFTB), Los Alamitos is located approximately 10 miles southwest. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 55 - in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response VII(e). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project may require temporary lane closures during the construction process. However, construction activities would not obstruct emergency operations since access along Ball Road and Sunkist Street would be maintained at all times. In addition, the project would be subject to all City requirements related to construction signage and traffic rerouting to ensure that emergency response and evacuation operations would not be significantly impacted. Upon completion of construction activities, the project would not obstruct traffic flow or emergency operations. Rather, since the project would increase the operational capacity of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, the project would result in a beneficial impact for emergency operations. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The project site is not located within or near any area capable of producing wildland fires. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 56 - b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?     c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?     d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?     e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?     f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?     g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?     h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?     i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?     j) Inundation by seiche or mudflow?     k) Substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 57 - l) Substantially degrade water quality by discharge which affects the beneficial uses swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or waters?     Section Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Impact. As part of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control direct storm water discharges. In California, the State Water Resources Control Board administers the NPDES permitting program and is responsible for developing NPDES permitting requirements. The NPDES program regulates industrial pollutant discharges, which include construction activities. The works in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Boards to preserve, protect, enhance, and restore water quality. The City of Anaheim is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Construction The adopted NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for Discharges of Stormwater Runoff Associated With Construction Activity (General Construction Permit). Construction sites with 1.0 acre or greater of soil disturbance or less than 1.0 acre, but part of a greater common plan of development, are required to apply for coverage for discharges under the General Construction Permit by submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage, developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address construction site pollutants. Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling, or excavation, but does not include regular maintenance activities. The City of Anaheim Grading Ordinance requires that all construction projects of 1.0 acre or more file an NOI and prepare a The proposed project would require approximately 1.2 acres of soil disturbance, and thus would be subject to these requirements. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would be subject to NPDES requirements, which include submitting a NOI for coverage, developing a and implementing BMPs. Compliance with existing NPDES requirements would reduce construction-related impacts to water quality to a less than significant level. Long-Term Operations The Municipal Storm Water Permitting Program regulates storm water discharges from municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). The have adopted NPDES storm water permits for medium and large municipalities. Most of these permits are issued to a group of co-permittees encompassing an entire metropolitan area. The Santa Ana issued the permit governing the public storm drain system discharges in northern Orange County from the storm drain systems owned and operated by the northern Orange County cities and Orange County (collectively “the Co-permittees”). This permit regulates storm water and urban runoff discharges from development to constructed and natural storm drain systems in the City of ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 58 - Anaheim. Among other requirements, the NPDES permit specifies requirements for managing runoff water quality from new development and significant redevelopment projects, including specific sizing criteria for treatment BMPs. As an intersection improvement project, it is not anticipated that the proposed project would result in a substantial change in water quality conditions at the site. The project does not include any structures or uses that would generate water quality pollutants or cause a violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Although the project may result in an increase in impervious area, any such increase would be nominal and existing stormwater drainage improvements in the site vicinity would continue to serve the project site. It should be noted that while there will be a slight increase in impervious surfaces, this increase will be partially off-set by the introduction of landscape planters. Upon compliance with existing NPDES requirements for long-term operations, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would include roadway widening improvements, and would not require groundwater extraction. The project would not include any uses that would result in an increase in water consumption, with the exception of a new 4- to 18-foot wide landscaped median on Ball Road that would require irrigation with possible landscape planters within newly installed sidewalks. The proposed improvements would not add a substantial amount of impervious area in comparison to existing conditions, and thus would not interfere with groundwater recharge. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not significantly alter the grade or drainage patterns that currently exist in the project area. The project site is currently developed with urbanized uses, and an existing City-operated stormwater drainage system serves the site vicinity. Project improvements would result in enhancements to the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, and would not introduce new uses or alter uses such that substantial erosion of siltation would occur on- or off-site. Refer to Response 4.IX(a), above, for a discussion of construction related water quality impacts. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 59 - Section Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. As stated above, the proposed project would not significantly alter the grade or drainage patterns that currently exist in the project area. The project site is currently developed with urbanized uses, and an existing City-operated stormwater drainage system serves the site vicinity. Project improvements would result in enhancements to the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, and would not introduce new uses or alter uses in a manner that would substantially increase runoff volumes. Impacts related to on- and off-site flooding would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Responses 4.IX(a) and 4.IX(d), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.IX(a). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The proposed project would not include any housing, and thus no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. The project would not include any structures, and thus no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less Than Significant Impact. Flood inundation resulting from dam failure is a potential hazard for the City. According to Figure S-7, Dam Inundation Map of the City’s General Plan, the ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 60 - majority of the City (including the project site) is situated within the flood impact zone associated with a potential failure of Prado Dam (located east of the City in Riverside & San Bernardino Counties). However, since the project proposes only intersection improvements, the project would not result in any increase in risks associated with levee or dam failure. The proposed project would not include the development of any residences or other structures that would expose people to a significant risk of loss, injury or death in the event of flooding. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Less Than Significant Impact. A seiche is an oscillation of a body of water in an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin, such as a reservoir, harbor, lake, or storage tank. A tsunami is a great sea wave, commonly referred to as a tidal wave, produced by a significant undersea disturbance such as tectonic displacement of a sea floor associated with large, shallow earthquakes. Mudflows result from the downslope movement of soil and/or rock under the influence of gravity. The City’s General Plan EIR only identifies the Walnut Canyon Reservoir as a potential risk for seiche. The Walnut Canyon Reservoir is owned and operated by the City of Anaheim and is located approximately 17 miles east of the project site. The Santa Ana River is located approximately one-half mile to the east. The proposed project includes roadway improvements, and would not increase the risk associated with seiche events. In addition, no housing or structures would be included as part of project implementation. Given its inland location (approximately 14 miles from the Pacific Ocean), risks from tsunami events is not considered significant. In addition, as stated within Response 4.VI(a)(4), the topography of the site and surrounding areas is not capable of producing landslide or mudslide events. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.IX(a), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Substantially degrade water quality by discharge, which affects the beneficial uses swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or waters? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.IX(a), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 61 - IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community?     b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?     c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?     Section Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The proposed project would provide for improvements to an existing intersection. The project would not include any structures or other features that would divide an established community. Ball Road and Sunkist Street can be characterized as roadways which separate and divide uses in the area; however, the proposed project would not substantially alter existing conditions in the project area. Thus, no impact would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. Ball Road and Sunkist Street are designated as a Primary Arterial and Secondary Arterial by the City’s General Plan, respectively. Uses immediately surrounding the intersection are designated Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and General Commercial. Uses immediately surrounding the intersection are designated by the City’s Zoning Code as Multiple-Family Residential (RM-4), Single-Family Residential (RS-3), General Commercial and Low Intensity Office The proposed project would not result in any change in roadway, land use, or zoning designations under the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code. The project would implement intersection improvements along Ball Road and Sunkist Street, and would not substantially alter uses adjacent to the site. The most notable project effect on an adjacent use would be the relocation of a parking lot associated with the retail/commercial center on the northeast corner of the intersection. However, this parking lot relocation would not result in any conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations. Thus, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 62 - Section Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.IV(f). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. X. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?     b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?     Section Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Less Than Significant Impact. According to Figure 5.9-1 of the City’s General Plan EIR, the proposed project site is located within a mineral resource zone (aggregate resources only). Although these resources may exist in the project area, the project area is fully built-out with urbanized uses, and no mining activities occur in the vicinity. Thus, implementation of the proposed roadway improvements would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.XI(a). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. XI. NOISE Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 63 - b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?     c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?     d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?     e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?     f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?     Narrative Summary: The following is a summary of an acoustical study that was conducted for the proposed project. The study, in its entirety, can be found in Section 6.0, Appendices. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines contains analysis guidelines related to the assessment of noise impacts. These guidelines have been utilized as thresholds of significance for this analysis. As stated in Appendix G, a project would create a significant environmental impact if it would:  Expose persons to, or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Expose persons to or generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels ((refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project (refer to Impact Statement Section below);  For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, expose people residing ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 64 - or working in the project area to excessive noise levels (refer to Impact Statement Section below); and  For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels (refer to Impact Statement Section below). Based on these standards and thresholds, the effects of the proposed project have been categorized as either a “less than significant impact” or a “potentially significant impact.” Mitigation measures are recommended for potentially significant impacts. Section Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Section A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Section A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION Construction activities are generally temporary and short in duration, resulting in periodic increases in the ambient noise environment. Construction activities are anticipated to take place over approximately six months in 2012, and would consist of site preparation and grading, trenching, paving, and building construction. Groundborne noise and other types of construction-related noise impacts would typically occur during the initial site preparation, which can create the highest levels of noise. However, site preparation typically has the shortest duration of all construction phases. Activities that occur during this phase include demolition, earthmoving, and soils compaction. High groundborne noise levels and other miscellaneous noise levels can be created during this phase due to the operation of heavy-duty trucks, backhoes, and front-end loaders. The anticipated short-term construction noise levels generated during grading, trenching, paving, and building construction activities are presented in Table XI-1, Construction Noise Levels. Construction noise levels were quantified using the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054). The distance is measured from the nearest sensitive receptor to the closest construction activity area of the Project site. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 65 - To summarize, construction activities would expose adjacent receptors to interior noise levels of:  74.1 dBA to 84.1 dBA during the demolition phase;  74.2 dBA to 84.2 dBA during the grading phase;  72.4 dBA to 82.4 dBA during the trenching phase;  72.2 dBA to 82.2 dBA during the paving phase; and  74.6 dBA to 84.6 dBA during the building construction phase. Actual construction-related noise activities would be lower than these conservative rates and would cease upon completion of construction. Furthermore, construction would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated or confined in the area directly adjacent to the residential uses to the north, east, south, and west. Pursuant to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, construction activities may occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. This exemption is included in the code in 14 United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, The Noise Guidebook, undated, page 14. Table XI-1 Construction Noise Levels Description Receptor Locations Estimated Exterior Construction Noise Level3,4 Estimated Interior Construction Noise Level3,4 Direction1 Distance2 Demolition North 19 94.1 74.1 East 6 104.1 84.1 South 13 97.4 77.4 West 8 101.6 81.6 Grading North 19 94.2 74.2 East 6 104.2 84.2 South 13 97.5 77.5 West 8 101.7 81.7 Trenching North 19 92.4 72.4 East 6 102.4 82.4 South 13 95.7 75.7 West 8 99.9 79.9 Paving North 19 92.2 72.2 East 6 102.2 82.2 South 13 95.5 75.5 West 8 99.7 77.7 Building Construction North 19 94.6 74.6 East 6 104.6 84.6 South 13 97.9 77.9 West 8 102.1 82.1 Notes: 1. Uses to the north, east, south, and west of the project are residential. 2. Distance is from the nearest sensitive receptor to the closest construction activity area of the Project site. 3. Derived from the Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), dated January 2006. Refer to Appendix B. 4. A typical building can reduce noise levels by 20 dBA with the windows closed.14 This assumes all windows and doors are closed, thereby attenuating the exterior noise levels by 20 dBA. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA – HEP – 05-054), January 2006; refer to Appendix B. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 66 - recognition that construction activities undertaken during daytime hours are a typical part of living in an urban environment and does not cause a significant disruption. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would further minimize impacts from construction noise. Also, nighttime construction would not occur. Thus, a less than significant noise impact would result from construction activities. LONG-TERM OPERATIONS Project implementation would result in additional traffic on adjacent roadways, thereby increasing vehicular generated noise in the vicinity of the existing residential uses. Traffic volumes were analyzed for the 2030 traffic volumes along the approach and departure segments associated with the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. According to Table XI-2, 2030 Traffic Noise Levels, noise levels at a distance of 100 feet from the centerline would range from 69.8 dBA to 68.7 dBA. The highest noise level for 2030 traffic volumes would occur along Ball Road, east of Sunkist Street. Traffic noise levels would be higher with the 2030 traffic volumes as compared to existing conditions. However, the traffic noise level increase would not be attributed to the proposed project, as the project consists of intersection improvements and does not include any new land uses that could generate new traffic trips. The proposed project would result in an additional left-turn lane in each direction along Sunkist Street, a third westbound lane along Ball Road, and a westbound right-turn lane along Ball Road. These additional lanes would require the widening of the roadways and intersection, which would move travel lanes approximately five feet closer to sensitive (residential) uses as compared to existing conditions. Moving the proposed travel lane approximately five feet closer to sensitive uses is not anticipated to result in a perceptible increase in noise levels experienced at the adjacent residential uses. It is also noted that the existing second story of the adjacent residential uses are currently not attenuated by the approximately 5.5-foot concrete block wall located along the intersection. Additionally, noise measurements conducted on November 10, 2010 (refer to Table 6 of the acoustical study in the appendices) concluded that noise levels experienced within the adjacent residential uses are lower than those predicted by the traffic noise level modeling. Therefore, it is anticipated that noise levels experienced within the adjacent residential uses would also be lower than the traffic noise levels presented in Table XI- 2. Thus, the widening of the intersection and roadways would not substantially increase the ambient noise level in the project area. Table XI-2 2030 Traffic Noise Levels Roadway Segment ADT dBA @ 100 Feet from Roadway Centerline Distance from Roadway Centerline to: (Feet) 60 CNEL Noise Contour 65 CNEL Noise Contour 70 CNEL Noise Contour Ball Road East of Sunkist Street 50,400 69.8 832 263 83 West of Sunkist Street 37,800 68.7 621 196 62 Sunkist Street North of Ball Road 24,900 65.8 350 111 35 South of Ball Road 24,300 66.8 317 100 32 ADT = average daily trips; dBA = A-weighted decibels; CNEL = community noise equivalent level Source: RBF Consulting, Project Study Report – Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements, September 23, 2010. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 67 - The majority of existing soundwalls along the edges of Ball Road and Sunkist Street would not be disturbed. However, Alternative 1 may require the removal of the existing block wall (approximately 5.5 feet in height) at the southwest corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection near multi-family residential uses. Should the removal of this block wall be required, Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would require the wall to be replaced with one of similar material and equal or higher height to the existing wall to ensure noise levels are not adversely increased. As traffic noise levels experienced by adjacent sensitive uses are not anticipated to substantially increase as a result of the proposed project, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department that the project complies with the following:  Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices.  Property occupants located adjacent to the project boundary shall be sent a notice, at least 15 days prior to commencement of construction of each phase, regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet shall also be posted at the project construction site. All notices and signs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, prior to mailing or posting and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints.  The Applicant shall provide, to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, a qualified “Noise Disturbance Coordinator.” The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within 24-hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Public Works Department. All notices that are sent to residential units immediately surrounding the construction site and all signs posted at the construction site shall include the contact name and the telephone number for the Disturbance Coordinator.  Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses residences, convalescent homes, etc.).  During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers.  Pursuant to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, construction activities shall occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. NOI-2 Should the proposed project require the removal of the existing block wall at the southwest corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection near the multi-family ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 68 - residential uses, the City of Anaheim shall replace the wall with one of equal or greater height and material to the existing wall. Said wall shall utilize decorative block that is compatible with the existing block wall design and shall incorporating vine pockets every five feet with 5 gallon clinging evergreen vines. Landscape improvements shall include a permanent irrigation system to maintain said vines. Section Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. Project construction can generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration, depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that damage structures. The types of construction vibration impact include human annoyance and building damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of human perception for extended periods of time. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between vibration source and receiver. In addition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. The vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table XI-3, Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment. Table XI-3 Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment Approximate peak particle velocity at 25 feet (inches/second) Approximate peak particle velocity at 75 feet (inches/second) Large bulldozer 0.089 0.017 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.015 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.001 Notes: 1 - Peak particle ground velocity measured at 25 feet unless noted otherwise. 2 - Root mean square amplitude ground velocity in decibels (VdB) referenced to 1 micro-inch/second. Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006. Groundborne vibration decreases rapidly with distance. As indicated in Table XI-3, based on the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) data, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment operation that would be used during project construction range from 0.003 to 0.089 inch-per-second peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet from the source of activity. At 75 feet from the source activity, vibration velocities range from 0.001 to 0.017 inch- per-second peak PPV. With regard to the proposed project, groundborne vibration would be ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 69 - generated primarily during site clearing and grading activities on-site and by off-site haul-truck travel. Although the closest occupied structures are located within 25 feet of the project site, the proposed construction activities would not be capable of exceeding the 0.2 inch-per-second PPV significance threshold for vibration. Therefore, vibration impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Section For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Section For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan. There is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within the City boundaries or within two miles of the project site. However, the North Net Fire Training Heliport is located approximately 1.5 miles south of the project site. The proposed project would not increase operations of the heliport and would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels, as the project involves the widening of an intersection. Therefore, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?     b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?     c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?     Section Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. The proposed project includes intersection improvements along Ball Road and Sunkist Street, and would not directly generate population growth since it does not include any ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 70 - residences or other structures. The project would not represent an indirect growth inducement impact since it would improve an existing intersection, and does not propose any new roadways. In addition, the project would not include any additional infrastructure (water, sewer, electrical, natural gas, etc.) that would serve or facilitate new development in the project area. The project would generate employment during the construction process; however, this process would be short-term in nature and would not facilitate the relocation of workers to the City. Thus, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The proposed project would not displace any housing. ROW acquisition would be required from several residential property owners along the intersection; however, no displacement would occur. Thus, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.XIII(b). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection?     Police protection?     Schools?     Parks?     Other public facilities?     Section(a): Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 71 - Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Anaheim Fire Department provides fire and emergency medical services for the City. Since the project does not propose any new structures or uses that would require additional demand for fire services, the project would not result in impacts associated with new or altered governmental facilities. Also refer to Response 4.VIII(g) for a discussion of potential impacts related to emergency response during project construction. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant for the short-term construction impacts. The project’s long-term impacts would improve Fire protection by enhancing fire vehicle access to the surrounding community. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Police protection services for the Anaheim residents are provided by the Anaheim Police Department. Since the project does not propose any new structures or uses that would require additional demand for police protection, the project would not result in impacts associated with new or altered governmental facilities. Also refer to Response 4.VIII(g) for a discussion of potential impacts related to emergency response during project construction. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant Impacts in this regard would be less than significant for the short-term construction impacts. The project’s long-term impacts would improve Police protection by enhancing police vehicle access to the surrounding community. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Schools? No Impact. The proposed project would not result in an increased demand for school facilities. The project includes roadway intersection improvements along Ball Road and Sunkist Street, and does not include new residences or other uses that would generate students. As such, no impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Parks? Less Than Significant Impact. The Parks Division of the City of Anaheim Community Services Department maintains Park facilities in the City of Anaheim. The Parks Division is responsible for maintenance and upkeep of approximately 700 acres of parklands within Anaheim. As stated above, the project would not include any residences or other uses that would generate long-term additional demand for parks. The project would generate employment during the construction process, which may result in a negligible increase in park usage in the project area; however, this employment would be short-term in nature and would cease upon the completion of construction. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Other public facilities? ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 72 - No Impact. No other impacts to public facilities beyond those identified above are anticipated to occur upon project implementation. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. XIV. RECREATION Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?     b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?     Section Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.XIV(a)(4). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.XIV(a)(4). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 73 - a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?     b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?     c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?     d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses?     e) Result in inadequate emergency access?     f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation bus stops/routes, bicycle lanes, sidewalks, etc.)?     Section Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? No Impact. The proposed project is intended to improve traffic efficiency at the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. The proposed project would provide for the buildout of Ball Road to its General Plan classification of a six-lane Primary Arterial roadway, and thus would result in a beneficial impact in relation to plan consistency. The project would not include any structures or other uses that would generate vehicular trips or conflict with policies related to alternative transit, intersections, streets, highways/freeways, pedestrian/bicycle paths, and mass transit. Thus, impacts in this regard would not occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 74 - but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.XVI(a), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. Due to the nature and scope of the proposed intersection improvement project, an increase in air traffic levels or change in location that result in substantial safety risks are not anticipated. No impacts would occur in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project could result in hazards during the short- term construction process. The proposed intersection improvements would require lane closures to accommodate an expansion of ROW. However, the proposed project would be subject to all City standards regarding temporary construction safety measures, which could include (but are not limited to) construction signage, a detailed rerouting plan, and/or use of construction flagperson during peak traffic hours. In addition, any impacts during the construction process would be short-term in nature and would cease upon completion of the project. On a long-term operational basis, the project is expected to result in beneficial impacts related to safety. The project would result in increased traffic efficiency at the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. As such, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.VIII(g), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 75 - No Impact. As stated above in Response 4.XVI(a), the project is intended to improve traffic efficiency at the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. The project would not include any structures or other uses that would generate vehicular trips or conflict with policies related to alternative transit, intersections, streets, highways/freeways, pedestrian/bicycle paths, and mass transit. Thus, impacts in this regard would not occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?     b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?     c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?     d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project (including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form) from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?     e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?     f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?     g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?     h) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity?     ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 76 - I) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas?     j) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service?     k) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception?     Section Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? No Impact. The project does not produce any uses capable of producing wastewater, nor would it alter or expand any existing uses to result in an increase in wastewater generation. No exceedance of wastewater treatment requirements would occur as a result of the project. Thus, impacts in this regard would not occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. The project does not include the construction of any structures or uses capable of consuming water. The only project facility that would require water would be a proposed 4- to 18-foot landscaped median along Ball Road. However, any water consumption associated with this landscaped median is anticipated to be nominal, and impacts related to water facilities would be less than significant. In addition, any landscaping and irrigation will use drought tolerant irrigation systems and plant materials. Refer to Response 4.XVII(a), above, for a discussion of wastewater facilities. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.IX(d), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.XVII(b), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 77 - Section Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.XVII(a), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact. The project does not produce any uses capable of producing solid waste, nor would it alter or expand any existing uses to result in an increase in solid waste generation. The only solid waste that could be generated by the project would be related to demolition waste (concrete, asphalt, etc.) associated with roadway expansion. However, given the limited scope of the proposed improvements, the anticipated amount of demolition waste would be nominal, and would cease upon the completion of construction. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.XVII(f), above. The proposed project would comply with all Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity? No Impact. The project would not include any uses capable of requiring electricity, natural gas, telephone, or television service. In addition, the project would not alter or expand any existing uses to result in an increase in demand for such utilities. Thus, impacts in this regard would not occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.XVII(h), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service? ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 78 - No Impact. Refer to Response 4.XVII(h), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.XVII(h), above. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Imp act a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?     b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?     c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?     Section Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. As described within this Preliminary Environmental Checklist, since the project is proposed within a completely disturbed and urbanized area, the proposed intersection improvements would not result in a significant impact to fish or wildlife species/populations, plant or animal communities, or endangered species. Analysis has concluded that potential impacts to unknown, buried archaeological and paleontological ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 79 - resources could occur during construction, and mitigation has been provided to minimize impacts in this regard. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant with mitigation. Section Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact. Due to the nature of the proposed project intersection improvements), implementation would not involve significant cumulative impacts. The proposed project would not result in substantial population growth within the project area, either directly or indirectly. Although the project may incrementally affect other resources that were determined to be less than significant, the project’s contribution to these effects is not considered “cumulatively considerable”, in consideration of the relatively nominal impacts of the project and mitigation measures provided. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. Section Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. Previous sections of this Preliminary Environmental Checklist reviewed the proposed project’s potential impacts related to air quality, noise, hazards, recreation, traffic, and other issues. However, implementation of the mitigation programs described throughout this document would reduce all potential impacts to less than significant levels. Fish and Game Determination (Per Section 21089(b) of the Public Resources Code, all project applicants and public agencies subject to the California Environmental Quality Act shall pay a Fish and Game filing fee for each proposed project that would adversely affect wildlife resources.)* Based on the responses contained in this Environmental Checklist, there is no evidence that the project has a potential for a change that would adversely affect wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Has the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CCR 753.5 been rebutted by substantial evidence? Yes (Certificate of Fee Exemption and County Administrative fee required) XX No (Pay fee) *Note: Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)(2)(A) states that projects that are Categorically Exempt from CEQA are also exempt from filing fee. 4.19 REFERENCES ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 80 - The following references were utilized during preparation of this Initial Study. These documents are available for review at the City of Anaheim Civic Center, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805. 1) Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Fundamentals and Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise, 1973. 2) California Department of Conservation website, http://www.conservation.ca.gov, 2006 3) City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim General Plan, Comprehensively Updated May 2004 and as amended thereafter. 4) City of Anaheim, Zoning Ordinance, Comprehensively Updated June 1004 and as amended thereafter. 5) Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act Review, 2008. 6) Orange County Airport Land Use Commission, Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Fullerton Municipal Airport, November 18, 2004. 7) The Planning Center, Final Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update EIR No. 330, May 25, 2004. 8) South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Analysis Guidance Handbook, October 2003. 4.20 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 928050 [PHONE REDACTED] Mr. Sandip Budhia, Associate Engineer Mr. Joseph W. Wright, Associate Planner Mr. William Grigsby, Assistant Engineer Biological Site Assessment for Ball Road/Sunkist (November 15, 2010): Harmsworth Associates Environmental Consultants, 29 Vacaville, Irvine, California, 92602, (714) 389-9527. Contact: Paul Galvin, M.S.. The following studies were prepared by RBF CONSULTING, 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, California 92618 (949/472-3505). Air Quality, Acoustical Study, and Hazardous Waste. These studies, in their entirety, can be found in Section 6.0, Appendices. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 81 - 5.0 INVENTORY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AIR QUALITY AQ-1 During project construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that construction equipment meets Tier IV or better emissions standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. o BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MM B-1 The Public Works Department shall ensure that a survey for active nests occurs 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 through June 30) and within 500 feet of any trees on the project site suitable for nesting. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation and grading activities associated with the project, the contractor shall cease all earth- disturbing activities within a 100-meter radius of the area of discovery and shall retain a qualified archaeologist, as determined by the Public Works Department, to evaluate the significance of the finding and appropriate course of action. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. CUL-2 In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation and grading activities associated with the project, the contractor shall cease all earth- disturbing activities within a 100-meter radius of the area of discovery and shall retain a qualified paleontologist that is approved by the Public Works Department to evaluate the significance of the finding and appropriate course of action. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAZ-1 The project shall include a Worker Safety Plan for construction worker employees. The Worker Safety Plan shall be prepared by a qualified Phase II/Site ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 82 - Characterization Specialist and approved by the Director of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. The Worker Safety Plan shall include information regarding potential chemical and physical hazards that may exist at the site as a result of the ARCO gasoline station located at 2445 E. Ball Road and describe safety measures to be followed by field personnel during clearing and excavation activities. NOISE NOI-1 Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department that the project complies with the following:  Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices.  Property occupants located adjacent to the project boundary shall be sent a notice, at least 15 days prior to commencement of construction of each phase, regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet shall also be posted at the project construction site. All notices and signs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, prior to mailing or posting and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints.  The Contractor shall provide, to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, a qualified “Noise Disturbance Coordinator.” The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within 24-hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Public Works Department. All notices that are sent to residential units immediately surrounding the construction site and all signs posted at the construction site shall include the contact name and the telephone number for the Disturbance Coordinator.  Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses residences, convalescent homes, etc.).  During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers.  Pursuant to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, construction activities shall occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. NOI-2 Should the proposed project require the removal of the existing block wall at the southwest corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection near the multi-family residential uses, the City of Anaheim shall replace the wall with one of equal or greater height and material to the existing wall. Said wall shall utilize decorative block that is compatible with the existing block wall design and shall incorporating ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 2014 - 83 - vine pockets every five feet with 5 gallon clinging evergreen vines. Landscape improvements shall include a permanent irrigation system to maintain said vines. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 APPENDICES Appendix A: Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Report, Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc., 8522 National Blvd, Culver City, CA 90232. Contact: Sam Silverman Appendix B: Biological Technical Letter, Ball Road/Sunkist, Harmsworth Associates Environmental Consultants, 29 Vacaville, Irvine, CA 92602. Contact: Paul Galvin, M.S. Appendix C: Hazardous Materials Assessment, Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Project, RBF Consulting, 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618. Contact: Ms. Kristen Bogue, CEI, REA Appendix D: Acoustical Assessment, Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Project, RBF Consulting, 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618. Contact: Mr. Eddie Torres, INCE, REA. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix A Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Report, Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc., 8522 National Blvd, Culver City, CA 90232. Contact: Sam Silverman ---PAGE BREAK--- Prepared for CITY OF ANAHEIM Prepared by TERRY A. HAYES ASSOCIATES INC. May 2014 BALL ROAD AND SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS taha 2014-048 AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT REPORT ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Table of Contents Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.1 Purpose of Report 2 2.2 Project Description 2 3.0 AIR QUALITY 4 3.1 Pollutants & Effects 4 3.2 Regulatory Setting 8 3.3 Existing Setting 13 3.4 Methodology and Significance Thresholds 16 3.5 Environmental Impacts 17 4.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 24 4.1 Pollutants & Effects 24 4.2 Regulatory Setting 25 4.3 Existing Setting 29 4.4 Methodology and Significance Criteria 31 4.5 Environmental Impacts 32 APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY CALCULATIONS LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Summary Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1 Table 3-1 State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status for the South Coast Air Basin 8 Table 3-2 2010-2012 Ambient Air Quality Data 14 Table 3-3 SCAQMD Daily Construction Emissions Thresholds 17 Table 3-4 SCAQMD Daily Operational Emissions Thresholds 17 Table 3-5 Construction Emissions- Unmitigated 19 Table 4-1 California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 30 Table 4-2 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions 32 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Project Site 3 Figure 3-1 South Coast Air Basin 12 Figure 3-2 Air Monitoring Area 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 1.0 Summary of Findings Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 1 1.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc. has completed air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) impact analyses for the Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements (Proposed Project). The assessment considered construction and operational impacts associated with the Proposed Project in accordance with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. As shown in Table 1-1, the Proposed Project would result in less-than-significant impacts related to air quality and GHG emissions. TABLE 1-1: SUMMARY IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Impact Mitigation Measures Significance After Mitigation Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable air quality plan of the South Coast AQMD? Less-Than-Significant Impact None Required Less than Significant Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less-Than-Significant Impact with Mitigation AQ1 The construction contractor shall ensure that construction equipment meets Tier IV emissions standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Less than Significant Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less-Than-Significant Impact with Mitigation AQ1 (above) Less than Significant Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less-Than-Significant Impact None Required Less than Significant Would the Proposed Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less-Than-Significant Impact None Required Less than Significant Would the Proposed Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less-Than-Significant Impact None Required Less than Significant SOURCE: TAHA, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 2.0 Introduction Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to evaluate air quality and GHG emissions associated with development of the Proposed Project. Air quality and GHG emissions have been analyzed for construction and operation of the Proposed Project. 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Proposed Project consists of roadway improvements planned for the existing intersection of Ball Road from Athena Way east to State Route 57 (SR 57), and along Sunkist Street from Whidby Lane south to Omega Ave in the City of Anaheim in order to increase efficiency and relieve traffic congestion (Figure 2-1). The Proposed Project would add a new second dedicated left-turn in both directions along Sunkist Street, a new third westbound through lane and dedicated right-turn lane along Ball Road, and would modify the existing median east of the intersection to accommodate additional right-of-way acquisition that is planned for the Proposed Project. ---PAGE BREAK--- LEGEND Project Site feet 0 1200 600 N Source: TAHA 2014. PROJECT SITE FIGURE 2-1 CITY OF ANAHEIM Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Report Olinda Rvillage Blackstone Olinda Village Blackstone ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 4 3.0 AIR QUALITY This section examines the degree to which the Proposed Project may result in significant adverse changes to air quality. Both short-term construction emissions occurring from activities, such as site grading and truck trips, and long-term effects related to the ongoing operation of the Proposed Project are discussed in this section. This analysis focuses on air pollution from two perspectives: daily emissions and pollutant concentrations. “Emissions” refer to the quantity of pollutant released into the air, measured in pounds per day (ppd). “Concentrations” refer to the amount of pollutant material per volumetric unit of air, measured in ppm or micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3). 3.1 POLLUTANTS & EFFECTS Criteria air pollutants are defined as pollutants for which the federal and State governments have established ambient air quality standards or criteria, for outdoor concentrations to protect public health. The federal and State standards have been set at levels above which concentrations could be harmful to human health and welfare. These standards are designed to protect the most sensitive persons from illness or discomfort. Pollutants of concern include carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5), particulate matter ten microns or less in diameter (PM10), and lead (Pb). These pollutants are discussed below. Carbon Monoxide (CO). CO is a colorless and odorless gas formed by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. CO is emitted almost exclusively from motor vehicles, power plants, refineries, industrial boilers, ships, aircraft and trains. In urban areas such as the project location, automobile exhaust accounts for the majority of CO emissions. CO is a non-reactive air pollutant that dissipates relatively quickly, so ambient CO concentrations generally follows the spacial and temporal distributions of vehicular traffic. CO concentrations are influenced by local meteorological conditions; primarily wind speed, topography and atmospheric stability. CO from motor vehicle exhaust can become locally concentrated when surface-based temperature inversions are combined with calm atmospheric conditions, a typical situation at dusk in urban areas between November and February.1 The highest levels of CO typically occur during the colder months of the year when inversion conditions are more frequent. In terms of health, CO competes with oxygen, often replacing it in the blood, thus reducing the blood’s ability to transport oxygen to vital organs. The results of excess CO exposure can be dizziness, fatigue, and impairment of central nervous system functions. Ozone (O3). O3 is a colorless gas that is formed in the atmosphere when reactive organic gases (ROG), which includes volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) react in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight. O3 is not a primary pollutant; it is a secondary pollutant formed by complex interactions of two pollutants directly emitted into the atmosphere. The primary sources of ROG and NOX, the components of O3, are automobile exhaust and industrial sources. Meteorology and terrain play major roles in O3 formation. Ideal conditions occur during summer and early autumn, on days with low wind speeds or stagnant air, warm temperatures and cloudless skies. The greatest source of smog-producing gases is the automobile. Short-term exposure (lasting for a few hours) to O3 at levels typically observed in Southern California can result in breathing pattern changes, reduction of breathing capacity, increased susceptibility to infections, inflammation of the lung tissue and some immunological changes. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2). NO2, like O3, is not directly emitted into the atmosphere but is formed by an atmospheric chemical reaction between nitric oxide (NO) and atmospheric oxygen. NO and NO2 are collectively referred to as NOX and are major contributors to O3 formation. NO2 also contributes to the formation of PM10. High concentrations of NO2 can cause breathing difficulties and result in a 1Inversion is an atmospheric condition in which a layer of warm air traps cooler air near the surface of the earth, preventing the normal rising of surface air. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 5 brownish-red cast to the atmosphere with reduced visibility. There is some indication of a relationship between NO2 and chronic pulmonary fibrosis. Some increase of bronchitis in children (two and three years old) has also been observed at concentrations below 0.3 parts per million (ppm). Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). SO2 is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur- containing fossil fuels. Main sources of SO2 are coal and oil used in power plants and industries. Generally, the highest levels of SO2 are found near large industrial complexes. In recent years, SO2 concentrations have been reduced by the increasingly stringent controls placed on stationary source emissions of SO2 and limits on the sulfur content of fuels. SO2 is an irritant gas that attacks the throat and lungs. It can cause acute respiratory and diminished ventilator function in children. SO2 can also yellow plant leaves and erode iron and steel. Particulate Matter. Particulate matter pollution consists of very small liquid and solid particles floating in the air, which can include smoke, soot, dust, salts, acids and metals. Particulate matter also forms when gases emitted from industries and motor vehicles undergo chemical reactions in the atmosphere. PM2.5 and PM10 represent fractions of particulate matter. Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5, is roughly 1/28 the diameter of a human hair. PM2.5 results from fuel combustion motor vehicles, power generation and industrial facilities), residential fireplaces and wood stoves. In addition, PM2.5 can be formed in the atmosphere from gases such as SO2, NOX, and VOC. Inhalable particulate matter, or PM10, is about 1/7 the thickness of a human hair. Major sources of PM10 include crushing or grinding operations; dust stirred up by vehicles traveling on roads; wood burning stoves and fireplaces; dust from construction, landfills and agriculture; wildfires and brush/waste burning; industrial sources; windblown dust from open lands; and atmospheric chemical and photochemical reactions. PM2.5 and PM10 pose a greater health risk than larger-size particles. When inhaled, these tiny particles can penetrate the human respiratory system’s natural defenses and damage the respiratory tract. PM2.5 and PM10 can increase the number and severity of asthma attacks, cause or aggravate bronchitis and other lung diseases, and reduce the body’s ability to fight infections. Very small particles of substances, such as lead, sulfates and nitrates can cause lung damage directly. These substances can be absorbed into the blood stream and cause damage elsewhere in the body. These substances can transport absorbed gases, such as chlorides or ammonium, into the lungs and cause injury. Whereas PM10 tends to collect in the upper portion of the respiratory system, PM2.5 is so tiny that it can penetrate deeper into the lungs and damage lung tissues. Suspended particulates also damage and discolor surfaces on which they settle, as well as produce haze and reduce regional visibility. Lead (Pb). Pb in the atmosphere occurs as particulate matter. Sources of lead include leaded gasoline; the manufacturers of batteries, paint, ink, ceramics, ammunition and secondary lead smelters. Prior to 1978, mobile emissions were the primary source of atmospheric lead. Between 1978 and 1987, the phase-out of leaded gasoline reduced the overall inventory of airborne lead by nearly 95 percent. With the phase-out of leaded gasoline, secondary lead smelters, battery recycling, and manufacturing facilities have become lead-emission sources of greater concern. Prolonged exposure to atmospheric lead poses a serious threat to human health. Health effects associated with exposure to lead include gastrointestinal disturbances, anemia, kidney disease, and in severe cases, neuromuscular and neurological dysfunction. Of particular concern are low- level lead exposures during infancy and childhood. Such exposures are associated with decrements in neurobehavioral performance, including intelligence quotient performance, performance, reaction time and growth. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 6 Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). TACs are generally defined as those contaminants that are known or suspected to cause serious health problems, but do not have a corresponding ambient air quality standard. TACs are also defined as an air pollutant that may increase a person’s risk of developing cancer and/or other serious health effects; however, the emission of a toxic chemical does not automatically create a health hazard. Other factors, such as the amount of the chemical, its toxicity, and how it is released into the air, the weather, and the terrain, all influence whether the emission could be hazardous to human health. TACs are emitted by a variety of industrial processes such as petroleum refining, electric utility and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust may exist as PM10 and PM2.5 or as vapors (gases). TACs include metals, other particles, gases absorbed by particles, and certain vapors from fuels and other sources. The emission of toxic substances into the air can be damaging to human health and to the environment. Human exposure to these pollutants at sufficient concentrations and durations can result in cancer, poisoning, and rapid onset of sickness, such as nausea or difficulty in breathing. Other less measurable effects include immunological, neurological, reproductive, developmental, and respiratory problems. Pollutants deposited onto soil or into lakes and streams affect ecological systems and eventually human health through consumption of contaminated food. The carcinogenic potential of TACs is a particular public health concern because many scientists currently believe that there is no "safe" level of exposure to carcinogens. Any exposure to a carcinogen poses some risk of contracting cancer. The public’s exposure to TACs is a significant public health issue in California. The Air Toxics “Hotspots” Information and Assessment Act is a state law requiring facilities to report emissions of TACs to air districts. The program is designated to quantify the amounts of potentially hazardous air pollutants released, the location of the release, the concentrations to which the public is exposed, and the resulting health risks. The State Air Toxics Program (AB 2588) identified over 200 TACs, including the 188 TACs identified in the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has assessed this expansive list of toxics and identified 21 TACs as Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs). MSATs are compounds emitted from highway vehicles and non-road equipment. Some toxic compounds are present in fuel and are emitted to the air when the fuel evaporates or passes through the engine unburned. Other toxics are emitted from the incomplete combustion of fuels or as secondary combustion products. Metal air toxics also result from engine wear or from impurities in oil or gasoline. USEPA also extracted a subset of these 21 MSAT compounds that it now labels as the six priority MSATs: benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, diesel particulate matter/diesel exhaust organic gases, acrolein, and 1,3-butadiene. While these six MSATs are considered the priority transportation toxics, USEPA stresses that the lists are subject to change and may be adjusted in future rules. To date, the most comprehensive study on air toxics in the Basin is the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES-III), conducted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The monitoring program measured more than 30 air pollutants, including both gases and particulates. The monitoring study was accompanied by a computer modeling study in which SCAQMD estimated the risk of cancer from breathing toxic air pollution throughout the region based on emissions and weather data. MATES-III found that the average cancer risk in the region from carcinogenic air pollutants ranges from about 870 in a million to 1,400 in a million, with an average regional risk of about 1,200 in a million. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 7 Diesel Particulate Matter (diesel PM). According to the 2006 California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality, the majority of the estimated health risks from TACs can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important being particulate matter from the exhaust of diesel-fueled engines. Diesel PM differs from other TACs in that it is not a single substance, but rather a complex mixture of hundreds of substances. Diesel exhaust is composed of two phases, gas and particle, and both phases contribute to the health risk. The gas phase is composed of many of the urban hazardous air pollutants, such as acetaldehyde, acrolein, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde and aromatic hydrocarbons. The particle phase is also composed of many different types of particles by size or composition. Fine and ultra fine diesel particulates are of the greatest health concern, and may be composed of elemental carbon with adsorbed compounds such as organic compounds, sulfate, nitrate, metals and other trace elements. Diesel exhaust is emitted from a broad range of diesel engines; the on road diesel engines of trucks, buses and cars and the off road diesel engines that include locomotives, marine vessels and heavy duty equipment. Although diesel PM is emitted by diesel-fueled internal combustion engines, the composition of the emissions varies depending on engine type, operating conditions, fuel composition, lubricating oil, and whether an emission control system is present. The most common exposure to diesel PM is breathing the air that contains diesel PM. The fine and ultra-fine particles are respirable (similar to PM2.5), which means that they can avoid many of the human respiratory system defense mechanisms and enter deeply into the lung. Exposure to diesel PM comes from both on-road and off-road engine exhaust that is either directly emitted from the engines or lingering in the atmosphere. Diesel exhaust causes health effects from both short-term or acute exposures, and long-term chronic exposures. The type and severity of health effects depends upon several factors including the amount of chemical exposure and the duration of exposure. Individuals also react differently to different levels of exposure. There is limited information on exposure to just diesel PM but there is enough evidence to indicate that inhalation exposure to diesel exhaust causes acute and chronic health effects. Acute exposure to diesel exhaust may cause irritation to the eyes, nose, throat and lungs, some neurological effects such as lightheadedness. Acute exposure may also elicit a cough or nausea as well as exacerbate asthma. Chronic exposure to diesel PM in experimental animal inhalation studies have shown a range of dose-dependent lung inflammation and cellular changes in the lung and immunological effects. Based upon human and laboratory studies, there is considerable evidence that diesel exhaust is a likely carcinogen. Human epidemiological studies demonstrate an association between diesel exhaust exposure and increased lung cancer rates in occupational settings. Unlike other TACs, no ambient monitoring data are available for diesel PM because no routine measurement method currently exists. However, California Air Resources Board (CARB) has made preliminary concentration estimates based on a PM exposure method. This method uses the CARB emissions inventory’s PM10 database, ambient PM10 monitoring data, and the results from several studies to estimate concentrations of diesel PM. Diesel PM poses the greatest health risk among these ten TACs mentioned. Based on receptor modeling techniques, SCAQMD estimated that diesel PM accounts for 84 percent of the total risk in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 8 3.2 REGULATORY SETTING Federal United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The CAA governs air quality in the United States. The USEPA is responsible for enforcing the CAA. USEPA is also responsible for establishing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). NAAQS are required under the 1977 CAA and subsequent amendments. USEPA regulates emission sources that are under the exclusive authority of the federal government, such as aircraft, ships, and certain types of locomotives. USEPA has jurisdiction over emission sources outside State waters beyond the outer continental shelf) and establishes various emission standards, including those for vehicles sold in States other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet stricter emission standards established by CARB. As required by the CAA, NAAQS have been established for seven major air pollutants: CO, NO2, O3, PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and Pb. The CAA requires USEPA to designate areas as attainment, nonattainment, or maintenance (previously nonattainment and currently attainment) for each criteria pollutant based on whether the NAAQS have been achieved. The federal standards are summarized in Table 3-1. The USEPA has classified the Basin as attainment for SO2, maintenance for PM10 and CO, and nonattainment for O3, PM2.5, and Pb. TABLE 3-1: STATE AND NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS AND ATTAINMENT STATUS FOR THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN Pollutant Averaging Period California Federal Standards Attainment Status Standards Attainment Status Ozone (O3) 1-hour 0.09 ppm (180 µg/m3) Nonattainment 8-hour 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) n/a 0.075 ppm (147 µg/m3) Nonattainment Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) 24-hour 50 µg/m3 Nonattainment 150 µg/m3 Maintenance Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 µg/m3 Nonattainment Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 24-hour 35 µg/m3 Nonattainment Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 µg/m3 Nonattainment 15 µg/m3 Nonattainment Carbon Monoxide (CO) 8-hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) Maintenance 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) Maintenance 1-hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m3) Maintenance 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) Maintenance Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 ppm (57 µg/m3) Nonattainment 0.053 ppm (100 µg/m3) Attainment 1-hour 0.18 ppm (338 µg/m3) Nonattainment 100 ppb (188 µg/m3 n/a Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 ppm (80 µg/m3) Attainment 24-hour 0.04 ppm (105 µg/m3) Attainment 0.14 ppm (365 µg/m3) Attainment 3-hour 1-hour 0.25 ppm (655 µg/m3) Attainment Lead (Pb) 30-day average 1.5 µg/m3 Nonattainment Calendar Quarter 1.5 µg/m3 Nonattainment n/a = not available SOURCE: CARB, Ambient Air Quality Standards, June 4, 2013; CARB, State Standard Area Designations, http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/statedesig.htm; USEPA, The Green Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants, http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/greenbk/index.html. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 9 State California Air Resources Board (CARB). In addition to being subject to the requirements of CAA, air quality in California is also governed by more stringent regulations under the California Clean Air Act (CCAA). In California, the CCAA is administered by the CARB at the State level and by the air quality management districts and air pollution control districts at the regional and local levels. The CARB, which became part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) in 1991, is responsible for meeting the State requirements of the CAA, administering the CCAA, and establishing the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The CCAA, as amended in 1992, requires all air districts in the State to endeavor to achieve and maintain the CAAQS. CAAQS are generally more stringent than the corresponding federal standards and incorporate additional standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility-reducing particles. CARB regulates mobile air pollution sources, such as motor vehicles. CARB is responsible for setting emission standards for vehicles sold in California and for other emission sources, such as consumer products and certain off-road equipment. CARB established passenger vehicle fuel specifications, which became effective in March 1996. CARB oversees the functions of local air pollution control districts and air quality management districts, which, in turn, administer air quality activities at the regional and county levels. The State standards are summarized in Table 3-1. The CCAA requires CARB to designate areas within California as either attainment or non- attainment for each criteria pollutant based on whether the CAAQS have been achieved. Under the CCAA, areas are designated as non-attainment for a pollutant if air quality data shows that a State standard for the pollutant was violated at least once during the previous three calendar years. Exceedances that are affected by highly irregular or infrequent events are not considered violations of a State standard and are not used as a basis for designating areas as nonattainment. Under the CCAA, the Los Angeles County portion of the Basin is designated as a nonattainment area for O3, PM2.5, NO2, and Pb.2 Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). CARB’s statewide comprehensive air toxics program was established in the early 1980's. The Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act created California's program to reduce exposure to air toxics. Under the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act, CARB is required to use certain criteria in the prioritization for the identification and control of air toxics. In selecting substances for review, CARB must consider criteria relating to "the risk of harm to public health, amount or potential amount of emissions, manner of, and exposure to, usage of the substance in California, persistence in the atmosphere, and ambient concentrations in the community" [Health and Safety Code Section 39666(f)]. The Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act also requires CARB to use available information gathered from the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act program to include in the prioritization of compounds. California has established a two-step process of risk identification and risk management to address the potential health effects from air toxic substances and protect the public health of Californians. During the first step (identification), CARB and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) determine if a substance should be formally identified as a TAC in California. During this process, CARB and the OEHHA staff draft a report that serves as the basis for this determination. CARB staff assesses the potential for human exposure to a substance and the OEHHA staff evaluates the health effects. After CARB and the OEHHA staff hold several comment periods and workshops, the report is then submitted to an independent, nine-member Scientific Review Panel (SRP), who reviews the report for its scientific accuracy. If the SRP approves the report, they develop specific scientific findings which are officially submitted to CARB. CARB staff then prepares a hearing notice and draft regulation to formally identify the substance 2CARB, Area Designation Maps, available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm, accessed May 6, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 10 as a TAC. Based on the input from the public and the information gathered from the report, the CARB Board decides whether to identify a substance as a TAC. In 1993, the California Legislature amended the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act by requiring CARB to identify 189 federal hazardous air pollutants as State TACs. In the second step (risk management), CARB reviews the emission sources of an identified TAC to determine if any regulatory action is necessary to reduce the risk. The analysis includes a review of controls already in place, the available technologies and associated costs for reducing emissions, and the associated risk. The Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (Health and Safety Code Section 44360) supplements the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act by requiring a statewide air toxics inventory, notification of people exposed to a significant health risk, and facility plans to reduce these risks. The "Hot Spots" Act also requires facilities that pose a significant health risk to the community to reduce their risk through a risk management plan. California’s Diesel Risk Reduction Program. The CARB identified particulate emissions from diesel- fueled engines (diesel PM) TACs in August 1998. Following the identification process, the CARB was required by law to determine if there is a need for further control, which led to the risk management phase of the program. For the risk management phase, CARB formed the Diesel Advisory Committee to assist in the development of a risk management guidance document and a risk reduction plan. With the assistance of the Advisory Committee and its subcommittees, CARB developed the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles and the Risk Management Guidance for the Permitting of New Stationary Diesel-Fueled Engines. The Board approved these documents on September 28, 2000, paving the way for the next step in the regulatory process: the control measure phase. During the control measure phase, specific Statewide regulations designed to further reduce diesel PM emissions from diesel-fueled engines and vehicles have and continue to be evaluated and developed. The goal of each regulation is to make diesel engines as clean as possible by establishing state-of-the-art technology requirements or emission standards to reduce diesel PM emissions. Local South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The 1977 Lewis Air Quality Management Act created the SCAQMD to coordinate air quality planning efforts throughout Southern California. This Act merged four county air pollution control agencies into one regional district to better address the issue of improving air quality in Southern California. Under the Act, renamed the Lewis-Presley Air Quality Management Act in 1988, the SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the region. Specifically, the SCAQMD is responsible for monitoring air quality, as well as planning, implementing, and enforcing programs designed to attain and maintain State and federal ambient air quality standards in the district. Programs that were developed include air quality rules and regulations that regulate stationary sources, area sources, point sources, and certain mobile source emissions. The SCAQMD is also responsible for establishing stationary source permitting requirements and for ensuring that new, modified, or relocated stationary sources do not create net emission increases. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 11 The SCAQMD monitors air quality within the project area. The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an area of 10,743 square miles, consisting of Orange County; the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties; and the Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin and Mojave Desert Air Basin. The Basin is a subregion of the SCAQMD and covers an area of 6,745 square miles. The Basin includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. The Basin is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west; the San Gabriel, San Bernardino and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east; and the San Diego County line to the south (Figure 3-1). All areas designated as nonattainment under the CCAA are required to prepare plans showing how the area would meet the State air quality standards by its attainment dates. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is the SCAQMD plan for improving regional air quality. It addresses CAA and CCAA requirements and demonstrates attainment with State and federal ambient air quality standards. The AQMP is prepared by SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The AQMP provides policies and control measures that reduce emissions to attain both State and federal ambient air quality standards by their applicable deadlines. Environmental review of individual projects within the Basin must demonstrate that daily construction and operational emissions thresholds, as established by the SCAQMD, would not be exceeded. The environmental review must also demonstrate that individual projects would not increase the number or severity of existing air quality violations. The 2012 AQMP was adopted by the SCAQMD on December 7, 2012. The 2012 AQMP is the current management plan for continued progression toward clean air and compliance with State and federal requirements. It includes a comprehensive strategy aimed at controlling pollution from all sources, including stationary sources, on- and off-road mobile sources and area sources. The 2012 AQMP proposes attainment demonstration of the PM2.5 standard by 2014 in the Basin through adoption of all feasible measures. The 2012 AQMP also incorporates current scientific information and meteorological air quality models. It also updates the federally approved 8-hour O3 control plan with new commitments for short-term NOX and VOC reductions. The 2012 AQMP includes short-term control measures related to facility modernization, energy efficiency, good management practices, market incentives, and emissions growth management. Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). The SCAQMD has a long and successful history of reducing air toxics and criteria emissions in the Basin. SCAQMD has an extensive control program, including traditional and innovative rules and policies. These policies can be viewed in the SCAQMD’s Air Toxics Control Plan for the Next Ten Years (March 2000). To date, the most comprehensive study on air toxics in the Basin is the MATES-III, conducted by the SCAQMD. The monitoring program measured more than 30 air pollutants, including both gases and particulates. The monitoring study was accompanied by a computer modeling study in which SCAQMD estimated the risk of cancer from breathing toxic air pollution throughout the region based on emissions and weather data. MATES-III found that the cancer risk in the region from carcinogenic air pollutants ranges from about 870 in a million to 1,400 in a million, with an average regional risk of about 1,200 in a million. ---PAGE BREAK--- South Coast Air Basin State of California San Francisco Gorman Pt. Dume Santa Monica Long Beach San Clemente San Diego Victorville Palm Springs SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN SOURCE: California Air Resources Board, State and Local Air Monitoring Network Plan, May 2008. FIGURE 3-1 SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN LEGEND: Approx. Scale N 0 150 75 Miles Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements CITY OF ANAHEIM Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Report ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 13 3.3 EXISTING SETTING 3.3.1 Air Pollution Climatology The project site is located within the Orange County portion of the Basin. The Basin is in an area of high air pollution potential due to its climate and topography. The general region lies in the semi- permanent high pressure zone of the eastern Pacific, resulting in a mild climate tempered by cool sea breezes with light average wind speeds. This Basin experiences warm summers, mild winters, infrequent rainfalls, light winds, and moderate humidity. This usually mild climatological pattern is interrupted infrequently by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana winds. The Basin is a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills, bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and high mountains around the rest of its perimeter. The mountains and hills within the area contribute to the variation of rainfall, temperature and winds throughout the region. The Basin experiences frequent temperature inversions. Temperature typically decreases with height. However, under inversion conditions, temperature increases as altitude increases, thereby preventing air close to the ground from mixing with the air above it. As a result, air pollutants are trapped near the ground. During the summer, air quality problems are created due to the interaction between the ocean surface and the lower layer of the atmosphere. This interaction creates a moist marine layer. An upper layer of warm air mass forms over the cool marine layer, preventing air pollutants from dispersing upward. Additionally, hydrocarbons and NO2 react under strong sunlight, creating smog. Light, daytime winds, predominantly from the west, further aggravate the condition by driving air pollutants inland, toward the mountains. During the fall and winter, air quality problems are created due to CO and NO2 emissions. CO concentrations are generally worse in the morning and late evening (around 10:00 In the morning, CO levels are relatively high due to cold temperatures and the large number of cars traveling. High CO levels during the late evenings are a result of stagnant atmospheric conditions trapping CO in the area. Since CO is produced almost entirely from automobiles, the highest CO concentrations in the Basin are associated with heavy traffic. NO2 levels are also generally higher during fall and winter days. 3.3.2 Local Climate The mountains and hills within the Basin contribute to the variation of rainfall, temperature, and winds throughout the region. Within the project site and its vicinity, the average wind speed, as recorded at the Anaheim-Pampas Lane Wind Monitoring Station, is approximately 3.7 miles per hour, with calm winds occurring approximately less than one percent of the time. Wind in the vicinity of the project site predominately blows from the southwest.3 The annual average temperature in the project area is 66.4 degrees Fahrenheit The project area experiences an average winter temperature of approximately 58.7°F and an average summer temperature of approximately 73.6°F. Total precipitation in the project area averages approximately 14.1 inches annually. Precipitation occurs mostly during the winter and relatively infrequently during the summer. Precipitation averages approximately 8.8 inches during the winter, approximately 3.2 inches during the spring, approximately 1.8 inches during the fall, and 0.2 inch during the summer.4 3SCAQMD, Meteorological Data, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/smog/metdata/MeteorologicalData.html, accessed May 5, 2014. 4Western Regional Climate Center, Historical Climate Information, available at http:// www.wrrc.dri.edu, accessed May 5, 2014 for Anaheim, CA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 14 3.3.3 Air Monitoring Data The SCAQMD monitors air quality conditions at 40 locations throughout the Basin. The project site is located in SCAQMD’s Capistrano Valley Air Monitoring Subregion, which is served by the Anaheim- Pampas Lane Monitoring Station. Anaheim-Pampas Monitoring Station is located approximately 3.5 miles east of the project site near the intersection of West Lincoln Avenue and South Euclid Street (Figure 3-2). Historical data from the Anaheim-Pampas Monitoring Station were used to characterize existing conditions in the vicinity of the project area. Table 3-2 shows pollutant levels, the State standards, and the number of exceedances recorded at the Anaheim- Pampas Monitoring Station from 2010 to 2012.5 As Table 3-2 indicates, criteria pollutants CO and NO2 did not exceed the State standards from 2010 to 2012. However, the one- hour and eight-hour State standards for O3 were exceeded zero to one time during this period while the eight-hour federal standard for O3 was not exceeded and the one-hour standard was exceeded zero to one time. The 24-hour State standard for PM10 was exceeded zero to 2 times during this time period; 24-hr State standard for PM2.5 has been exceeded every year. TABLE 3-2: 2010-2012 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA Pollutant Pollutant Concentration & Standards Anaheim-Pampas Monitoring Station Number of Days Above State Standard 2010 2011 2012 Ozone (O3) Maximum 1-hr Concentration (ppm) Days > 0.09 ppm (State 1-hr standard) 0.104 1 0.088 0 0.079 0 Maximum 8-hr Concentration (ppm) Days > 0.07 ppm (State 1-hr standard) 0.088 1 0.072 1 0.067 0 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maximum 8-hr Concentration (ppm) Days > 9.0 ppm (State 8-hr standard) 1.98 0 2.08 0 2.34 0 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Maximum 1-hr Concentration (ppm) Days > 0.18 ppm (State 1-hr standard) 0.08 0 0.07 0 0.07 0 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) Maximum 24-hr Concentration (µg/m3) Days > 50 µg/m3 (State 24-hr standard) — 53 2 48 0 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Maximum 24-hr Concentration (µg/m3) Exceed State Standard (12 µg/m3) 42 Yes 47 Yes 54 Yes = There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value. SOURCE: CARB, Air Quality Data Statistics, Top 4 Summary, http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php, accessed May 5, 2014. 3.3.4 Sensitive Receptors Some land uses are considered more sensitive to changes in air quality than others, depending on the population groups and the activities involved. CARB has identified the following groups who are most likely to be affected by air pollution: children less than 14 years of age, the elderly over 65 years of age, athletes and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. According to the SCAQMD, sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers and retirement homes. 5Monitored data for 2013 was not available when this analysis was completed. ---PAGE BREAK--- Pacific Ocean 20 17 21 19 18 Costa Mesa Monitoring Station 16. North Orange County 17. Central Orange County 18. North Orange County Coastal 19. Saddleback Valley 20. Central Orange County Coastal 21. Capistrano Valley 25. Lake Elsinore LEGEND: Air Monitoring Areas in Orange County: SOURCE: South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Monitoring Areas, 1999. Approx. Scale Miles 0 9.0 3.0 6.0 N 10 10 210 210 60 60 5 5 15 15 215 Corona Chino Industry Tustin Anaheim Laguna Nigel Lake Elsinore Costa Mesa Irvine San Bernardino Hemet Riverside 210 Azusa FIGURE 3-2 AIR MONITORING AREAS 405 25 Not part of South Coast Air Basin Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 16 Fullerton Project Site CITY OF ANAHEIM Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Report ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 16 Sensitive receptors within 1,640 feet (500 meters) of the project site include the following:  Residences adjacent to west and east of Sunkist Street  Residences adjacent to north and south of Ball Road  James Guinn Elementary School, located 500 feet north of the construction area  Katella High School Athletic Field, located 620 feet northwest of the construction area The above sensitive receptors represent the nearest residential land uses with the potential to be impacted by the Proposed Project. Additional sensitive receptors are located further from the project site in the surrounding community and would be less impacted by air emissions than the above sensitive receptors. 3.4 METHODOLOGY AND SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 3.4.1 Methodology This air quality analysis is consistent with the methods described in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993 edition), as well as the updates to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, as provided on the SCAQMD website. Emissions were estimated using spreadsheet methodology. Equipment emission rates were obtained from the Appendix D of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) manual. 3.4.2 Significance Thresholds In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project would have a significant impact related to air quality if it would:  Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan;  Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation;  Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors);  Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; and/or  Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The SCAQMD has developed specific CEQA significance thresholds to assess construction and operational air quality impacts from criteria pollutants. Construction Phase Significance Thresholds The Proposed Project would have a significant impact if:  Daily localized or regional, construction emissions were to exceed SCAQMD thresholds presented in Table 3-3;  The Proposed Project would generate significant emissions of TACs; and/or  The Proposed Project would create an odor nuisance. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 17 TABLE 3-3: SCAQMD DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Criteria Pollutant Regional Emissions (Pounds Per Day) Localized Emissions (Pounds Per Day) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 75 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 100 81 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 485 Sulfur Oxides (SOX) 150 Fine Particulates (PM2.5) 55 3 Particulates (PM10) 150 4 Localized thresholds based on 25-meter receptor distance and a 1-acre project site. SOURCE: SCAQMD, 2014. Operations Phase Significance Thresholds The Proposed Project would have a significant impact if:  Daily operational emissions were to exceed SCAQMD operational emissions thresholds presented in Table 3-4;  Project-related traffic causes CO concentrations at study intersections to violate the CAAQS for either the one- or eight-hour period. The CAAQS for the one- and eight-hour periods are 20 and 9.0 ppm, respectively;  The Proposed Project would generate significant emissions of TACs;  The Proposed Project would create an odor nuisance; and/or  The Proposed Project would not be consistent with the AQMP. TABLE 3-4: SCAQMD DAILY OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Criteria Pollutant Pounds Per Day Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 55 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 55 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 Sulfur Oxides (SOX) 150 Fine Particulates (PM2.5) 55 Particulates (PM10) 150 SOURCE: SCAQMD, 2014. 3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 3.5.1 Would the Proposed Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) Impact Analysis On December 7, 2012, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the 2012 AQMP to continue the progression toward clean air and compliance with State and federal requirements. It includes a comprehensive strategy aimed at controlling pollution from all sources, including stationary sources, on- and off-road mobile sources and area sources. The 2012 AQMP proposes attainment of the federal PM2.5 standard by 2014 in the Basin through adoption of all feasible measures. The AQMP also incorporates current scientific information and meteorological air quality models. It further updates the federally approved 8-hour O3 control plan with new commitments for short-term NOX and VOC reductions. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 18 The AQMP focuses on long-term sources of emissions. The Proposed Project is not a land use development project with housing and would not generate significant new employment opportunities. The Proposed Project would not require zone changes, conditional uses, or entitlements that would modify the existing zoning or land use designations utilized to develop the AQMP emission inventories. The Proposed Project would not generate new growth or emissions that would conflict with the goals of the AQMP. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to the AQMP. Regarding short-term sources of emissions, the Proposed Project would generate fugitive dust emissions during earthwork activity. The South Coast Air Basin has been designated as State and federal nonattainment areas for PM2.5 and PM10. Fugitive dust generated during construction activity could interfere with the AQMP’s demonstration of attainment for particulate matter. The Proposed Project would implement a dust control plan through construction Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) and best management practices (BMPs) related to SCAQMD Rule 403 for the control of fugitive dust. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to consistency with the AQMP. Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. 3.5.2 Would the Proposed Project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation) Impact Analysis Construction Regional Emissions. Construction of the Proposed Project has the potential to create air quality impacts through the use of heavy-duty construction equipment and through vehicle trips generated by construction workers traveling to and from the project site. Fugitive dust emissions would primarily result from grading activities. NOX emissions would primarily result from the use of construction equipment. The assessment of construction air quality impacts considers each of these potential sources. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of operation and, for dust, and the prevailing weather conditions. It is mandatory for all construction projects in the Basin to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for Fugitive Dust. Specific Rule 403 requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground covers as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the project site, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Compliance with Rule 403 would reduce regional PM2.5 and PM10 emissions associated with construction activities by approximately 61 percent. Table 3-5 shows the maximum daily emissions associated with construction activity. Daily construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds. Therefore, without mitigation, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to regional construction emissions. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 19 TABLE 3-5: CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS- UNMITIGATED Construction Phase Pounds Per Day VOC NOX CO SOX PM2.5 PM10 Demolition On-Site Emissions 1 10 7 <1 1 2 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 10 7 <1 1 2 Grading On-Site Emissions 3 35 22 <1 3 5 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 3 35 23 <1 3 5 Trenching On-Site Emissions 1 14 6 <1 1 1 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 14 7 <1 1 1 Building Construction On-Site Emissions 1 6 4 <1 <1 <1 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 6 4 <1 <1 <1 Paving On-Site Emissions 1 11 7 <1 1 1 Off-Site Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Emissions 1 11 8 <1 1 1 Maximum On-Site and Off-Site Total 3 35 23 <1 3 5 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD 75 100 550 150 55 150 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Maximum Localized Emissions 3 35 22 <1 3 5 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD 81 485 3 4 Exceed Threshold? No No Yes Yes Assumed a 1-acre project site and a 25-meter (82-foot) receptor distance. SOURCE: TAHA, 2014. Localized Emissions. Emissions for the localized construction air quality analysis of PM2.5, PM10, CO, and NO2 were compiled using LST methodology promulgated by the SCAQMD.6 Localized on-site emissions were calculated using similar methodology to the regional emission calculations. LSTs were developed based upon the size or total area of the emissions source, the ambient air quality in each source receptor area, and distance to the sensitive receptor. The majority of on-site emissions would be related to equipment exhaust and fugitive dust associated with earthwork. As shown in Table 3-5, daily construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD localized thresholds for PM2.5 and PM10. Therefore, without mitigation, the Proposed Project would result in a significant impact related to localized construction emissions. Operations Regional Emissions. Operational emissions would be emitted from vehicles accessing the intersection. In general, land development projects such as residential or commercial development result in increased vehicle trips to a site, while transportation related projects often lead to 6The concentrations of SO2 are not estimated because construction activities would generate a small amount of SOX emissions. No State standard exists for VOC. As such, concentrations for VOC were not estimated. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 20 redistribution of vehicular traffic in such a way that redistribution decreases traffic congestion and increases efficiency of the transportation network. The Proposed Project is intended to increase transportation efficiency by relieving traffic congestion at the intersection of Sunkist Street and Ball Road. According to the traffic study, the Proposed Project would improve intersection level of service (LOS) from D to B for both AM and PM peak hours in 2016 despite natural growth in the number of vehicles. It is also anticipated that in 2035 the Proposed Project would still result in improved volume to capacity ratio at the intersection, although the intersection during both AM and PM peak hours would operate near its capacity in LOS F. Less wait time behind the traffic light for the build scenario in 2016 compared to the no-build scenario would result in direct reduced emissions generated by idling vehicles. Sunkist Street and Ball Road both experience truck traffic. Ball road is a designated truck route and a primary arterial roadway, and Sunkist Street is listed as a secondary arterial roadway on the County’s Master Plan of Arterial Highway. Although the Sunkist Street is not designated as truck route, the presence of heavy trucks is identified in the traffic study.7 Idling trucks are a substantial source of particulate matter emissions. According to EMFAC2011, a truck traveling 5 miles per hour generates 0.31 grams per mile of PM10, while a truck traveling 25 miles per hour generate 0.08 grams per mile of PM10. Improving the intersection efficiency would directly reduce regional passenger vehicle and truck emissions. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less- than-significant impact related to regional operational emissions. Localized Emissions. CO concentrations in the future are expected to be lower than existing conditions due to stringent State and federal mandates for lowering vehicle emissions. Although traffic volumes would be higher in the future both without and with the implementation of the Proposed Project, CO emissions from mobile sources are expected to be much lower due to technological advances in vehicle emissions systems, as well as from normal turnover in the vehicle fleet. Accordingly, increases in traffic volumes are expected to be offset by increases in cleaner-running cars as a percentage of the entire vehicle fleet on the road. An exceedance of the State CO standards at an intersection is referred to as a CO hotspot. The SCAQMD recommends a CO hotspot evaluation of potential localized CO impacts when volume-to- capacity (V/C) ratios are increased by two percent at intersections with a LOS of D or worse. SCAQMD also recommends a CO hotspot evaluation when an intersection decreases in LOS by one level beginning when LOS changes from C to D. According to the traffic study, implementation of the Proposed Project improvements would provide additional traffic capacity and would reduce the volume to capacity ratio from LOS D to LOS B in 2016 during both AM and PM peak hours. Similarly in 2035 the added traffic capacity would improve the LOS from E to D for AM peak hour and would reduce the volume to capacity ratio during the PM peak hour. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to localized carbon monoxide operational emissions. The Proposed Project would also replace 32 commercial parking stalls of the Sunkist Plaza with 33 proposed parking stalls within a vacant area of the eastern portion of the property adjoining the existing parking lot. It is not anticipated that implementation of the Proposed Project improvements increases the utilization of the aforementioned parking stalls which are currently underutilized. In addition, the nearest sensitive receptor to the proposed parking lot is located 30 feet towards the north. The existing parking stalls within Sunkist Plaza are also located greater than 30 feet from the same sensitive receptor. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in significant CO hotspots from the proposed parking lot. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to CO hotspots from the proposed parking lot. 7Currently there is no restriction on passage of heavy duty trucks through the Sunkist Street. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 21 Mitigation The following mitigation measure applies to the construction activity: AQ1 The construction contractor shall ensure that construction equipment meets Tier IV or better emissions standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Significance After Mitigation Impacts related to PM2.5 and PM10 construction-related regional emissions without mitigation measures were determined to be significant. Implementation of the Mitigation Measure AQ1 would reduce the identified impacts to below significance levels by utilizing low-emission off-road construction equipment. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce unmitigated PM2.5 and PM10 emissions by 2 ppd, to 4 and 3 ppd, respectively. These emissions would be less than the SCAQMD localized significant thresholds of 3 ppd for PM2.5 and 4 ppd for PM10. Therefore, with mitigation, the Proposed Project would result in less-than-significant impacts related to construction emission. 3.5.3 Would the Proposed Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation) Impact Analysis There is an existing regional cumulative impact associated with O3, PM10, PM2.5, Pb, and NO2 because the Basin is designated as a State and/or federal nonattainment air basin for these pollutants. However, an individual project can emit these pollutants without significantly contributing to this cumulative impact depending on the magnitude of emissions. This magnitude is determined by the project-level significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD. The operational improvements would increase the efficiency of the intersection by improving traffic operations and reducing traffic congestion during operations of the Proposed Project. The increased efficiency would inherently lower emissions generated by trucks and passenger cars during idling at the intersection and overall lowers cumulative emissions in long-term. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable increase in operational emissions. Regarding construction emissions, the Proposed Project would exceed the project-level SCAQMD localized significance thresholds for particulate matter, and could contribute to a cumulative PM10 and/or PM2.5 impact. Therefore, without mitigation, the Proposed Project would contribute to a cumulative considerable increase in construction emissions. Mitigation Refer to Mitigation Measure AQ1, above. Significance After Mitigation As previously discussed, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ1, maximum daily construction emissions would be less than the applicable thresholds for all criteria pollutants. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 22 3.5.4 Would the Proposed Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) Impact Analysis Construction The greatest potential for TAC emissions during construction would be diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy-duty equipment operations. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are described in terms of individual cancer risk. “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk assessment methodology. The majority of heavy-duty construction equipment activity would take place over an 8-month period during site preparation activity. These short-term emissions would not substantially contribute to a significant construction health risk. No residual emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to construction TAC emissions. All types of asbestos are now considered hazardous and pose public health risks. Asbestos is the generic term for the naturally occurring fibrous (asbestiform) (NOA) varieties of six silicate material. These minerals are: tremolite (when fibrous), actinolite (when fibrous), crocidolite (fibrous riebckite), (when fibrous), amosite (fibrous cummingonite-grunerite). is the most common asbestos mineral in California and belongs to the serpentine mineral group. Asbestos also refers to an industrial product obtained by mining and processing deposits of the asbesitform mineral. Asbestos is listed as a toxic air contaminant by CARB and as a Hazardous Air Pollutant by the USEPA. Asbestos occurs naturally in surface deposits of several types of rock formations. Serpentine rock has also been used extensively as base material in the construction of new roads. Serpentinite and/or ultramafic rock are known to be present in 44 of California’s 58 counties. These rocks are particularly abundant in the counties of the Sierra Nevada foothills, the Klamath Mountains, and Coast Ranges. Exposure and disturbance of rock and soil that contains asbestos can result in the release of fibers to the air and consequent exposure to the public. Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology has published location guide maps for areas in California that more likely contain NOA-containing rock formation. 8 The Project site is not located within the areas where occurrences of asbestos may be an issue. In addition, USEPA has determined that, severely damaged, otherwise non-friable materials can release significant amounts of asbestos fibers. Asbestos has been banned from many building materials under the Toxic Substances Control Act, the CAA, and the Consumer Product Safety Act. In addition, the project would not demolish or disturb existing buildings or other facilities that may have asbestos. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to airborne asbestos during construction. Operations The SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.9 Improvements of the Proposed Project would reduce the traffic congestion by mobilizing the traffic more efficiently. Reducing the 8A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos, ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/ofr/ofr_2000-019.pdf, accessed May 5, 2014. 9SCAQMD, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 3.0 Air Quality Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 23 wait time and idling would directly decrease overall TAC operational emissions by reducing idling emissions. Based on the reduced strength of TAC sources, the Proposed Project would not warrant the need for a health risk assessment associated with on-site activities, and potential TAC impacts are expected to be less than significant. The CARB has published guidance for locating new sensitive receptors residences) out of harm’s way with respect to nearby sources of air pollution.10 Although the Proposed Project would not construct a new receptor, it would widen the roadway towards residences. The CARB recommends against locating new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of an urban road with 100,000 vehicles per day. The average daily traffic along the four segments that comprise the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection range from 12,012 to 51,164 vehicles. These volumes are well below the CARB recommendations of locating residences adjacent to roadways, and the intersection activity would not generate significant exposure from automobile exhaust. In addition, Improvements of the Proposed Project are intended to increase efficiency and relieve traffic congestion. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less-than-significant impact related to TACs. Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. 3.5.5 Would the Proposed Project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) Impact Analysis Construction Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. Odors from these sources would be localized and generally confined to the immediate area surrounding the project site. The Proposed Project would utilize typical construction techniques, and the odors would be typical of most construction sites and temporary in nature. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to construction odors. Operations According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses and industrial operations that are associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies and fiberglass molding. The improvements of the Proposed Project would be performed under the category of transportation development; this type of use is not typically associated with odor complaints. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to operational odors. Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. 10CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 24 4.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The purpose of this section is to discuss describe how the Proposed Project will would affect regional GHG emissions. GHG emissions refer to airborne pollutants that are generally believed to affect global climate conditions. These pollutants have the effect of trapping heat in the atmosphere, thereby altering weather patterns and climatic conditions. 4.1 POLLUTANTS & EFFECTS Greenhouse Gases and the Greenhouse Effect GHG emissions refer to a group of emissions that affect global climate conditions. Simply put, the greenhouse effect compares the Earth and the atmosphere surrounding it to a greenhouse with glass panes. The glass panes in a greenhouse let heat from sunlight in and reduce the amount of heat that escapes. GHGs, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) keep the average surface temperature of the Earth close to 60°F. Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth would be a frozen globe with an average surface temperature of about 5°F. Types of Greenhouse Gases In addition to CO2, CH4, and N2O, GHGs include hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride, and water vapor. According to a Climate Action Team Report prepared for the State Governor and Legislature, CO2 is the most abundant pollutant that contributes to climate change through fossil fuel combustion. CO2 comprised 81 percent of the total GHG emissions in California in 2002 and non-fossil fuel CO2 comprised 2.3 percent. The other GHGs are less abundant but have higher global warming potential than CO2. To account for this higher potential, emissions of other GHGs are frequently expressed in the equivalent mass of CO2, denoted as CO2e. CO2e is a measurement used to account for the fact that different GHGs have different potential to retain infrared radiation in the atmosphere and contribute to the greenhouse effect. This potential, known as the global warming potential (GWP) of a GHG, is dependent on the lifetime, or persistence, of the gas molecule in the atmosphere. For example, one ton of CH4 has the same contribution to the greenhouse effect as approximately 23 tons of CO2. Therefore, CH4 is a much more potent GHG than CO2. Expressing emissions in CO2e takes the contributions of all GHG emissions to the greenhouse effect and converts them to a single unit equivalent to the effect that would occur if only CO2 were being emitted. The CO2e of CH4 and N2O represented 6.4 and 6.8 percent, respectively, of the 2002 California GHG emissions. Other high global warming potential gases represented 3.5 percent of these emissions. In addition, there are a number of man-made pollutants, such as CO, NOX, non-methane VOC, and SO2, that have indirect effects on terrestrial or solar radiation absorption by influencing the formation or destruction of other climate change emissions. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the transportation, industrial/manufacturing, utility, residential, commercial and agricultural sectors. In California, the transportation sector is the largest emitter of GHGs, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 are by products of fossil fuel combustion. CH4, a highly potent GHG, results from off-gassing (the release of chemicals from nonmetallic substances under ambient or greater pressure conditions) is largely associated with agricultural practices and landfills. N2O is also largely attributable to agricultural practices and soil management. CO2 sinks, or reservoirs, include vegetation and the ocean, which absorb CO2 through sequestration and dissolution, respectively, two of the most common processes of CO2 sequestration. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 25 California produced 474 million gross metric tons (MMT) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) averaged over the period from 2002 to 2004. Combustion of fossil fuel in the transportation sector was the single largest source of California’s GHG emissions in 2002 to 2004, accounting for 38 percent of total GHG emissions in the State. This sector was followed by the electric power sector (including both in-State and out-of-State sources) (18 percent) and the industrial sector (21 percent). 4.2 REGULATORY SETTING Federal The USEPA is the federal agency responsible for implementing the CAA. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its decision in Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al. ([2007] 549 U.S. 05-1120), issued on April 2, 2007, that CO2 is an air pollutant as defined under the CAA, and that USEPA has the authority to regulate emissions of GHGs. In response to the mounting issue of climate change, USEPA has taken actions to regulate, monitor, and potentially reduce GHG emissions. State The following discussion includes State policies applicable to the proposed residential development. Executive Order S-3-05. On June 1, 2005, E.O. S-3-05 set the following GHG emission reduction targets: by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The E.O. calls for the Secretary of California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) to be responsible for coordination of State agencies and progress reporting. A recent California Energy Commission report concludes, however, that the primary strategies to achieve this target should be major “decarbonization” of electricity supplies and fuels, and major improvements in energy efficiency. In response to the E.O., the Secretary of the Cal/EPA created the Climate Action Team (CAT), including the Secretaries of the Natural Resources Agency, and the Department of Food and Agriculture, and the Chairs of the Air Resources Board, Energy Commission, and Public Utilities Commission. The original mandate for the CAT was to develop proposed measures to meet the emission reduction targets set forth in the E.O. The CAT has since expanded and currently has members from 18 State agencies and departments. The CAT also has ten working groups which coordinate policies among their members. The working groups and their major areas of focus are:  Agriculture: Focusing on opportunities for agriculture to reduce GHG emissions through efficiency improvements and alternative energy projects, while adapting agricultural systems to climate change;  Biodiversity: Designing policies to protect species and natural habitats from the effects of climate change;  Energy: Reducing GHG emissions through extensive energy efficiency policies and renewable energy generation;  Forestry: Coupling GHG mitigation efforts with climate change adaptation related to forest preservation and resilience, waste to energy programs and forest offset protocols;  Land Use and Infrastructure: Linking land use and infrastructure planning to efforts to reduce GHG from vehicles and adaptation to changing climatic conditions;  Oceans and Coastal: Evaluating the effects sea level rise and changes in coastal storm patterns on human and natural systems in California;  Public Health: Evaluating the effects of GHG mitigation policies on public health and adapting public health systems to cope with changing climatic conditions; ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 26  Research: Coordinating research concerning impacts of and responses to climate change in California;  State Government: Evaluating and implementing strategies to reduce GHG emissions resulting from State government operations; and  Water: Reducing GHG impacts associated with the State’s water systems and exploring strategies to protect water distribution and flood protection infrastructure. The CAT is responsible for preparing reports that summarize the State’s progress in reducing GHG emissions. The most recent CAT Report was published in December 2010. The CAT Report discusses mitigation and adaptation strategies, State research programs, policy development, and future efforts. Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), California Global Warming Solutions Act. In September 2006, the State passed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, also known as AB 32, into law. AB 32 focuses on reducing GHG emissions in California, and requires the CARB to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to Statewide levels in 1990 by 2020. To achieve this goal, AB 32 mandated that the CARB establish a quantified emissions cap, institute a schedule to meet the cap, implement regulations to reduce Statewide GHG emissions from stationary sources, and develop tracking, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that reductions are achieved. Because the intent of AB 32 is to limit 2020 emissions to the equivalent of 1990, the regulations affect many existing sources of GHG emissions and not just new general development projects. Senate Bill (SB) 1368, a companion bill to AB 32, requires the California Public Utilities Commission and the California Energy Commission to establish GHG emission performance standards for the generation of electricity. These standards also apply to power that is generated outside of California and imported into the State. AB 32 charges CARB with the responsibility to monitor and regulate sources of GHG emissions in order to reduce those emissions. On June 1, 2007, CARB adopted three discrete early action measures to reduce GHG emissions. These measures involved complying with a low carbon fuel standard, reducing refrigerant loss from motor vehicle air conditioning maintenance, and increasing methane capture from landfills. On October 25, 2007, CARB tripled the set of previously approved early action measures. The approved measures include improving truck efficiency reducing aerodynamic drag), electrifying port equipment, reducing perfluorocarbons from the semiconductor industry, reducing propellants in consumer products, promoting proper tire inflation in vehicles, and reducing sulfur hexaflouride emission from the non-electricity sector. The CARB initially determined that the total Statewide aggregated GHG 1990 emissions level and 2020 emissions limit was 427 million metric tons of CO2e. Based on the estimated GHG emissions inventory, the State was mandated to reduce GHG emissions to 174 million metric tons by 2020. AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan. The CARB AB 32 Scoping Plan contains the main strategies to achieve the 2020 emissions cap. The Scoping Plan was developed by the CARB with input from the CAT and included a comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall carbon emissions in California, improve the environment, reduce oil dependency, diversify energy sources, and enhance public health while creating new jobs and improving the State economy. The GHG reduction strategies contained in the Scoping Plan include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non-monetary incentives, voluntary actions, and market- based mechanisms such as a cap-and-trade system. Key approaches for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 include:  Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance standards;  Achieving a Statewide renewable electricity standard of 33 percent; ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 27  Developing a California cap-and-trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative partner programs to create a regional market system;  Establishing targets for transportation-related GHG emissions for regions throughout California, and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets; and  Adopting and implementing measures to reduce transportation sector emissions, including California’s clean car standards and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. In February 2014, CARB released the Proposed First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan. This Update identifies the next steps for California’s leadership on climate change. The first Update to the initial AB 32 Scoping Plan describes progress made to meet the near-term objectives of AB 32 and defines California’s climate change priorities and activities for the next several years. It also frames activities and issues facing the State as it develops an integrated framework for achieving both air quality and climate goals in California beyond 2020. Specifically, the Update covers a range of topics:  An update of the latest scientific findings related to climate change and its impacts, including short-lived climate pollutants.  A review of progress-to-date, including an update of Scoping Plan measures and other State, federal, and local efforts to reduce GHG emissions in California.  Potential technologically feasible and cost-effective actions to further reduce GHG emissions by 2020.  Recommendations for establishing a mid-term emissions limit that aligns with the State’s long- term goal of an emissions limit 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.  Sector-specific discussions covering issues, technologies, needs, and ongoing State activities to significantly reduce emissions throughout California’s economy through 2050. As discussed above, in December 2007, CARB approved a total statewide GHG 1990 emissions level and 2020 emissions limit of 427 million metric tons of CO2e. As part of the Update, CARB is proposing to revise the 2020 Statewide limit to 431 million metric tons of CO2e, an approximately one percent increase from the original estimate. The 2020 business-as-usual (BAU) forecast in the Update is 509 million metric tons of CO2e. The State would need to reduce those emissions by 15 percent to meet the 431 million metric tons of CO2e 2020 limit. CARB has also developed the GHG mandatory reporting regulation, which required reporting beginning on January 1, 2008 pursuant to requirements of AB 32. The regulations require reporting for certain types of facilities that make up the bulk of the stationary source emissions in California. The regulation language identifies major facilities as those that generate more than 25,000 metric tons of CO2 per year. Cement plants, oil refineries, electric generating facilities/providers, co-generation facilities, and hydrogen plants and other stationary combustion sources that emit more than 25,000 metric tons of CO2 per year, make up 94 percent of the point source CO2 emissions in California. CEQA Guidelines Amendments. California SB 97 required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop CEQA Guidelines “for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions or the effects of greenhouse gas emissions.” The CEQA Guidelines amendments provided guidance to public agencies regarding the analysis and mitigation of the effects of GHG emissions in CEQA documents. Noteworthy revisions to the CEQA Guidelines included:  Lead agencies should quantify all relevant GHG emissions and consider the full range of project features that may increase or decrease GHG emissions as compared to the existing setting;  Consistency with the CARB Scoping Plan is not a sufficient basis to determine that a project’s GHG emissions would not be cumulatively considerable; ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 28  A lead agency may appropriately look to thresholds developed by other public agencies, including the CARB’s recommended CEQA thresholds;  To qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be identified and incorporated into the project. General compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation;  The effects of GHG emissions are cumulative and should be analyzed in the context of CEQA’s requirements for cumulative impact analysis; and  Given that impacts resulting from GHG emissions are cumulative, significant advantages may result from analyzing such impacts on a programmatic level. If analyzed properly, later projects may tier, incorporate by reference, or otherwise rely on the programmatic analysis. Senate Bill 375. SB 375, adopted in September 30, 2008, provides a means for achieving AB 32 goals through the reduction in emissions of cars and light trucks. SB 375 requires new Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) to include Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCSs). This legislation also allows the development of an Alternative Planning Strategy (APS) if the targets cannot be feasibly met through an SCS. The APS is not included as part of the RTP. In adopting SB 375, the Legislature expressly found that improved land use and transportation systems are needed in order to achieve the GHG emissions reduction target of AB 32. Further, the staff analysis for the bill prepared for the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee’s August 29, 2008 hearing on SB 375 began with the following statement: “According to the author, this bill will help implement AB 32 by aligning planning for housing, land use, transportation and GHG emissions for the 17 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) in the State.” The CARB is required to provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. The CARB is also charged with reviewing each SCS or APS for consistency with its assigned GHG emission reduction targets. In compliance with SB 375, the SCAG approved the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS, which is further discussed below under regional regulations. Executive Order S-13-08. Signed on November 14, 2008, E.O. S-13-08 directed California to develop methods for adapting to climate change through preparation of a Statewide plan. The E.O. directed OPR, in cooperation with the CRA, to provide land use planning guidance related to sea level rise and other climate change impacts. The order also directed the CRA to develop a State Climate Adaptation Strategy and to convene an independent panel to complete the first California Sea Level Rise Assessment Report. The CRA released the Third Climate Change Assessment in 2009 and is in the process of updating the 2009 California Climate Adaption Strategy. California Air Resource Board (CARB) Guidance. The CARB has published draft guidance for setting interim GHG significance thresholds (October 24, 2008). The guidance is the first step toward developing the recommended Statewide interim thresholds of significance for GHG emissions that may be adopted by local agencies for their own use. The guidance does not attempt to address every type of project that may be subject to CEQA, but instead focuses on common project types that are responsible for substantial GHG emissions industrial, residential, and commercial projects). The CARB believes that thresholds in these important sectors will advance climate objectives, streamline project review, and encourage consistency and uniformity in the CEQA analysis of GHG emissions throughout the State. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 29 Regional Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) 2012-2035 RTP/SCS. SCAG completed the RTP/SCS, which includes a strong commitment to reduce regional GHG emissions. Goals and policies included in the RTP/SCS are generally related to transportation and consist of adding density in proximity to transit stations, mixed-use development and encouraging active transportation non-motorized transportation such as bicycling). South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD adopted a “Policy on Global Warming and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion” on April 6, 1990. The policy commits the SCAQMD to consider global impacts in rulemaking and in drafting revisions to the AQMP. In March 1992, the SCAQMD Governing Board reaffirmed this policy and adopted amendments to the policy. SCAQMD released draft guidance regarding interim CEQA GHG significance thresholds in 2008. The SCAQMD proposed the use of a percent emission reduction target 30 percent) to determine significance for commercial/residential projects that emit greater than 3,000 metric tons per year. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the staff proposal for an interim GHG significance threshold for stationary source/industrial projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. However, SCAQMD has yet to adopt a GHG significance threshold for land use development projects residential/commercial projects) and has formed a GHG Significance Threshold Working Group to further evaluate potential GHG significance thresholds. SCAQMD has convened a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group to provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents. Members of the working group include government agencies implementing CEQA and representatives from various stakeholder groups that will provide input to the SCAQMD staff on developing CEQA GHG significance thresholds. The working group is currently discussing multiple methodologies for determining project significance. These methodologies include categorical exemptions, consistency with regional GHG budgets in approved plans, a numerical threshold, performance standards, and emissions offsets. 4.3 EXISTING SETTING The primary effect of rising global concentrations of atmospheric GHG levels is a rise in the average global temperature of approximately 0.2 degrees Celsius per decade, determined from meteorological measurements worldwide between 1990 and 2005. Climate change modeling using 2000 emission rates shows that further warming is likely to occur given the expected rise in global atmospheric GHG concentrations from innumerable sources of GHG emissions worldwide, which would induce further changes in the global climate system during the current century.11 Adverse impacts from global climate change worldwide and in California include:  Declining sea ice and mountain snow peak levels, thereby increasing sea levels and sea surface evaporation rates with a corresponding increase in atmospheric water vapor due to the atmosphere’s ability to hold more water vapor at higher temperatures;12  Rising average global sea levels primarily due to thermal expansion and the melting of glaciers, ice caps, and the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets;13 11USEPA, Draft Endangerment Finding, 74 Fed. Reg. 18886, 18904, April 24, 2009. 12Ibid. 13Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change, 2007. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 30  Changing weather patterns, including changes to precipitation, ocean salinity, and wind patterns, and more energetic aspects of extreme weather including droughts, heavy precipitation, heat waves, extreme cold, and the intensity of tropical cyclones;14  Declining Sierra Mountains snowpack levels, which account for approximately half of the surface water storage in California, by 70 percent to as much as 90 percent over the next 100 years;15  Increasing the number of days conducive to ozone formation clear days with intense sun light) by 25 to 85 percent (depending on the future temperature scenario) in high O3 areas located in the Southern California area and the San Joaquin Valley by the end of the 21st Century;16 and  Increasing the potential for erosion of California’s coastlines and seawater intrusion into the Sacramento Delta and associated levee systems due to the rise in sea level.17 Scientific understanding of the fundamental processes responsible for global climate change has improved over the past decade. However, there remain significant scientific uncertainties, for example, in predictions of local effects of climate change, occurrence of extreme weather events, and effects of aerosols, changes in clouds, shifts in the intensity and distribution of precipitation, and changes in oceanic circulation. Due to the complexity of the climate system, the uncertainty surrounding the implications of climate change may never be completely eliminated. Because of these uncertainties, there continues to be significant debate as to the extent to which increased concentrations of GHGs have caused or will cause climate change, and with respect to the appropriate actions to limit and/or respond to climate change. In addition, it may not be possible to link specific development projects to future specific climate change impacts, though estimating project-specific impacts is possible. California is the fifteenth largest emitter of GHG on the planet, representing about two percent of the worldwide emissions.18 Table 4-1 shows the California GHG emissions inventory for years 2002 to 2011. Statewide GHG emissions decreased in 2009 due to a noticeable drop in on- road transportation, electricity generation, and industrial emissions. TABLE 4-1: CALIFORNIA GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Sector CO2e Emissions (million metric tons) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Transportation 184 184 187 189 189 189 177 172 171 168 Electric Power (In-State) 50 48 49 45 50 54 54 56 47 40 Electric Power (Imports) 59 65 66 63 55 60 66 48 44 47 Commercial and Residential 43 42 44 43 43 44 45 44 45 45 Industrial 94 93 96 94 92 89 89 84 91 93 Recycling and Waste 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 High GWP 7 8 9 9 10 11 11 12 14 15 Agriculture 32 33 33 33 34 33 34 32 32 32 Emissions Total 476 479 489 482 479 486 483 455 450 448 SOURCE: CARB, California Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2000-2011, August 1, 2013. 14Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change, 2007 15Cal/EPA, Climate Action Team, Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature, 2006. 16Ibid. 17Ibid. 18CARB, Climate Change Scoping Plan, December 2008. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 31 4.4 METHODOLOGY AND SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA 4.4.1 Methodology GHG emissions were estimated using spreadsheet methodology. The emission rates were obtained from the Appendix D of the CalEEMod manual. CalEEMod is a Statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and GHG emissions associated with both construction and operational from a variety of land use projects. The model quantifies direct emissions from construction and operation (including vehicle use), as well as indirect emissions, such as GHG emissions from energy use, solid waste disposal, vegetation planting and/or removal, and water use. 4.4.2 Significance Criteria In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project would have a significant impact related to air quality if it would:  Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; and/or  Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The CEQA Guidelines require Lead Agencies to adopt GHG threshold of significance. When adopting these thresholds, the amended Guideline allows lead agencies to consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided that the thresholds are supported by substantial evidence, and/or to develop their own significance threshold. Neither the City of Anaheim nor the SCAQMD have formally adopted GHG thresholds of significance for CEQA. As such, this assessment follows guidance from the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) CEQA and Climate Change White Paper (January 2008). CAPCOA conducted an analysis of various approaches and significance thresholds, ranging from a zero threshold (all projects are cumulatively considerable) to a high of 40,000 to 50,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. For example, an approach assuming a zero threshold and compliance with AB 32 2020 targets would require all discretionary projects to achieve a 33 percent reduction from projected “business-as-usual” emissions to be considered less than significant. A zero threshold approach could be considered on the basis that climate change is a global phenomenon, and not controlling small source emissions would potentially neglect a major portion of the GHG inventory. However, the CEQA Guidelines also recognize that there may be a point where a project’s contribution, although above zero, would not be a considerable contribution to the cumulative impact (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15130[a]). Therefore, a threshold of greater than zero is considered more appropriate for the analysis of GHG emissions under CEQA. Another method would use a quantitative threshold of greater than 900 metric tons CO2e per year based on a market capture approach that requires mitigation for greater than 90 percent of likely future discretionary development. Another potential threshold would be the 10,000 metric tons standard used by the Market Advisory Committee for inclusion in a GHG Cap and Trade System in California. The basic concepts for the various approaches suggested by CAPCOA are used herein to determine whether or not the Proposed Project’s GHG emissions are “cumulatively considerable.” ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road and Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements 4.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Report taha 2014-048 32 The most conservative lowest) thresholds, suggested by CAPCOA, would not be appropriate for the Proposed Project given that it is located in a highly-urbanized community. Similarly, the 900-metric ton threshold was also determined to be too conservative for general development in the Basin. Consequently, the threshold of 10,000 metric tons of CO2e per year is used as a quantitative benchmark for significance in the Basin. 4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Would the Proposed Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) Impact Analysis The Proposed Project would not generate new vehicle trips and would not construct new land uses that would generate GHG emissions. Therefore, this analysis focuses on construction emissions. Emissions would be generated by equipment exhaust, truck trips, and worker commute trips. Based on SCAQMD guidance, construction emissions were amortized over a 30-year span. As shown in Table 4-2, GHG emissions would be 57 metric tons per year. GHG emissions would be less than the 10,000 metric tons of CO2e per year quantitative significance threshold. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to GHG emissions. TABLE 4-2: ESTIMATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Construction Emissions Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (Metric Tons per Year) Construction Emissions 57 Construction Emissions Amortized over 30 years 2 Regional Significance Threshold 10,000 Exceed Threshold? No SOURCE: TAHA, 2014. Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. Would the Proposed Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) Impact Analysis The primary State and regional plans for reducing GHG emissions include the AB 32 Scoping Plan prepared by CARB and the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS prepared by SCAG. The Proposed Project would facilitate the movement of vehicles through the intersection by reducing congestion. The roadway widening project would not interfere with goals or policies in either of these comments, most of which are designed to reduce emissions either from land use development or large-scale industry electricity generation). Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to consistency with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation. Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix A Air Quality Calculations ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction Emissions without Mitigation ---PAGE BREAK--- Proposed Project Construction Detail HP dLaFys # #Round Trips Per Day Demolition Total Volume(30,000 cu. Ft) Daily Volume (3,000 cu.ft ) On Road Travel (138.59 miles) Concrete/Industrial Saw Concrete/IndustrialSaws 16.00 0.73 1 11 8.0 Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers 357.00 0.40 1 11 2.0 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 108.00 0.37 2 11 8.0 Worker Trips 8 11 1 Haul Truck Trips 1 10 11 Grading Daily Grading (0.2 acre) Total Excavation (1000 cu.yd) Import (NA) Export (1000 cu. Yd ) Total Acre Disturbed (1.16) Max (0.2 acre) On‐Site Cut/fill (1000 cu. Yd/day ) On‐Road Truck Travel (500 miles) Grader Graders 174.00 0.41 1 10 6.0 Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers 255.00 0.40 1 10 8.0 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 108.00 0.37 1 10 8.0 Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment 172.00 0.42 1 10 8.0 Water Truck 1 10 1.0 Worker Trips 10 10 1 Haul Truck Trips 1 2 5 Trenching Excavators Excavators 168.00 0.38 2 22 8.0 Other General Industrial EquOtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 238.00 0.34 1 22 8.0 Worker Trips 6 22 1 Paving Acres to be paved (0.6 acre) Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers 10.00 0.56 4 33 6.0 ---PAGE BREAK--- Proposed Project Construction Detail Paver Pavers 100.00 0.42 1 33 7.0 Roller Rollers 95.00 0.38 1 33 7.0 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 108.00 0.37 1 33 7.0 Worker Trips 9 33 1 Building Construction Total Amout to be Paved (0.6 acre) Forklifts Forklifts 145.00 0.20 2 33 6.0 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 108.00 0.37 1 33 8.0 Worker Trips 8 33 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Emission Rates HP dLaFys # #Round Trips Per Day Year CH4_RUNEX CO_RUNEX CO2_NBIO_RUNEX Demolition Worker Trips 8 11 1 2014 0.02 1.46 344.82 Haul Truck Trips 1 10 11 2014 0.01 2.08 1681.17 Grading Grader Graders 174.00 0.41 1 10 6.0 2014 Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers 255.00 0.40 1 10 8.0 2014 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 108.00 0.37 1 10 8.0 2014 Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment 172.00 0.42 1 10 8.0 2014 Water Truck 1 10 1.0 0.02 1.46 344.82 Worker Trips 10 10 1 2014 0.02 1.46 344.82 Haul Truck Trips 1 2 5 2014 0.01 2.08 1681.17 Trenching 2014 Excavators Excavators 168.00 0.38 2 22 8.0 2014 Other General Industrial EquOtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 238.00 0.34 1 22 8.0 Worker Trips 6 22 1 2014 0.02 1.46 344.82 Paving Acres to be paved (0.6 acre) Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers 10.00 0.56 4 33 6.0 2014 Paver Pavers 100.00 0.42 1 33 7.0 2014 Roller Rollers 95.00 0.38 1 33 7.0 2014 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 108.00 0.37 1 33 7.0 2014 Worker Trips 9 33 1 0.02 1.46 344.82 Building Construction Total Amout to be Paved (0.6 acre) Forklifts Forklifts 145.00 0.20 2 33 6.0 2014 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 108.00 0.37 1 33 8.0 2014 Worker Trips 8 33 1 2014 0.02 1.46 344.82 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Emission Rates Demolition Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Grader Graders Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching Excavators Excavators Other General Industrial EquOtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment Worker Trips Paving Acres to be paved (0.6 acre) Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers Paver Pavers Roller Rollers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips Building Construction Total Amout to be Paved (0.6 acre) Forklifts Forklifts Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips EMFAC Emission Factors (g/mile) NOX_RUNEX PM10_PMBW PM10_PMTW PM10_RUNEX PM25_PMBW PM25_PMTW PM25_RUNEX ROG_RUNEX SO2_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX 0.14 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 7.96 0.06 0.03 0.15 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.31 0.02 0.35 0.14 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.14 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 7.96 0.06 0.03 0.15 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.31 0.02 0.35 0.14 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.14 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.14 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Emission Rates Demolition Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Grader Graders Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching Excavators Excavators Other General Industrial EquOtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment Worker Trips Paving Acres to be paved (0.6 acre) Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers Paver Pavers Roller Rollers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips Building Construction Total Amout to be Paved (0.6 acre) Forklifts Forklifts Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips Offroad Equipment (g/bh‐hr) TOG ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 1.01 0.85 3.95 8.70 0.01 0.49 0.45 527.83 0.16 0.84 0.71 6.16 8.06 0.00 0.38 0.35 524.68 0.16 0.69 0.58 3.83 5.58 0.00 0.44 0.40 523.02 0.15 0.67 0.57 3.39 6.37 0.00 0.33 0.31 514.55 0.15 0.46 0.39 3.15 4.66 0.00 0.23 0.21 516.91 0.15 0.58 0.49 2.05 6.15 0.00 0.25 0.23 517.92 0.15 1.08 0.67 3.47 4.19 0.01 0.18 0.18 568.30 0.06 0.81 0.68 3.77 6.20 0.00 0.48 0.44 514.38 0.15 0.83 0.70 3.81 6.39 0.00 0.48 0.44 518.79 0.15 0.69 0.58 3.83 5.58 0.00 0.44 0.40 523.02 0.15 0.69 0.58 3.52 6.35 0.00 0.35 0.32 516.69 0.15 0.69 0.58 3.83 5.58 0.00 0.44 0.40 523.02 0.15 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Daily Emissions Offsite Emission (lb/day) based on EMFAC model CH4_RUNEX CO_RUNEX CO2_NBIO_RUNEX NOX_RUNEX PM10_PMBW PM10_PMTW PM10_RUNEX PM25_PMBW PM25_PMTW Demolition Worker Trips 0.004 0.361 85.141 0.036 0.009 0.002 0.001 0.004 0.000 Haul Truck Trips 0.000 0.064 51.481 0.244 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.001 0.000 Grading Grader Graders Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment Water Truck 0.001 0.064 15.204 0.006 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 Worker Trips 0.005 0.451 106.427 0.045 0.011 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.001 Haul Truck Trips 0.001 0.115 92.659 0.439 0.003 0.002 0.008 0.001 0.000 Trenching Excavators Excavators Other General Industrial Equ OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment Worker Trips 0.003 0.271 63.856 0.027 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.003 0.000 Paving Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers Paver Pavers Roller Rollers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips 0.004 0.406 95.784 0.040 0.010 0.002 0.001 0.004 0.001 Building Construction Forklifts Forklifts Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips 0.004 0.361 85.141 0.036 0.009 0.002 0.001 0.004 0.000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Daily Emissions Demolition Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Grader Graders Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching Excavators Excavators Other General Industrial Equ OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment Worker Trips Paving Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers Paver Pavers Roller Rollers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes PM25_RUNEX ROG_RUNEX SO2_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX S (mph) vehicle mean speed traveled Acreage of grading site As(acre) Blade width of the grading equipment PM2.5 Fugitive Emissions (lb/day) PM10 Fugitive Emissions (lb/day) 0.000 0.009 0.001 0.014 0.004 0.009 0.000 0.011 7.10 0.20 12.00 0.05 0.50 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.017 0.008 0.017 0.001 0.019 0.000 0.007 0.001 0.010 Grading Worker Trips Building Construction Forklifts Forklifts Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.015 0.000 0.009 0.001 0.014 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Daily Emissions Demolition Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Grader Graders Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching Excavators Excavators Other General Industrial Equ OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment Worker Trips Paving Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers Paver Pavers Roller Rollers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Fugitive Dust Emissions Material Moisture Content Material Slit Content PM2.5 Fugitive Emissions (lb/day) PM10 Fugitive Emissions (lb/day) Daily Throghput (cy/day) Daily Throghput (tons/day) U (mph) Wind mean speed Material Moisture Content PM2.5 Fugitive Emissions (lb/day) PM10 Fugitive Emissions (lb/day) 0.08 0.07 1.48 2.05 100.00 120.00 2.20 0.12 0.14 0.93 Bulldozing Truck loading Worker Trips Building Construction Forklifts Forklifts Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Daily Emissions Demolition Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Grader Graders Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching Excavators Excavators Other General Industrial Equ OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment Worker Trips Paving Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers Paver Pavers Roller Rollers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes On‐Site Offroad Equipment Emissions Offroad Equipment(lb/day) TOG ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 0.95 0.80 3.73 8.21 0.00 0.46 0.42 498.10 0.15 1.51 1.27 11.09 14.50 0.01 0.68 0.62 943.88 0.28 0.49 0.41 2.70 3.93 0.00 0.31 0.28 368.61 0.11 0.86 0.72 4.31 8.12 0.01 0.42 0.39 655.59 0.19 0.52 0.44 3.55 5.24 0.01 0.26 0.24 582.01 0.17 0.83 0.70 2.93 8.78 0.01 0.36 0.33 739.16 0.22 0.08 0.05 0.26 0.31 0.00 0.01 0.01 42.10 0.00 0.53 0.44 2.45 4.02 0.00 0.31 0.29 333.40 0.10 0.46 0.39 2.12 3.56 0.00 0.27 0.24 289.02 0.09 0.43 0.36 2.36 3.44 0.00 0.27 0.25 322.53 0.10 Worker Trips Building Construction Forklifts Forklifts Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips 0.26 0.22 1.35 2.44 0.00 0.13 0.12 198.21 0.06 0.49 0.41 2.70 3.93 0.00 0.31 0.28 368.61 0.11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction‐ Daily Emissions Localized Emissions (lb/day) TOG ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 FPM10 FPM2.5 Ov_PM10 Ov_PM2.5 CO2 CH4 Demolition Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Grader Graders 0.95 0.80 3.73 8.21 0.00 0.46 0.42 0.50 0.05 0.96 0.48 498 0.15 Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers 1.51 1.27 11.09 14.50 0.01 0.68 0.62 2.05 1.48 2.72 2.10 944 0.28 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.49 0.41 2.70 3.93 0.00 0.31 0.28 0.93 0.14 1.23 0.42 369 0.11 Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment 0.86 0.72 4.31 8.12 0.01 0.42 0.39 0.42 0.39 656 0.19 Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching 1.35 1.14 6.48 14.02 0.01 0.62 0.57 0.62 0.57 1321 0.39 Excavators Excavators 0.52 0.44 3.55 5.24 0.01 0.26 0.24 0.26 0.24 582 0.17 Other General Industrial EquOtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 0.83 0.70 2.93 8.78 0.01 0.36 0.33 0.36 0.33 739 0.22 Worker Trips Paving Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers 0.08 0.05 0.26 0.31 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 42 0.00 Paver Pavers 0.53 0.44 2.45 4.02 0.00 0.31 0.29 0.31 0.29 333 0.10 Roller Rollers 0.46 0.39 2.12 3.56 0.00 0.27 0.24 0.27 0.24 289 0.09 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.43 0.36 2.36 3.44 0.00 0.27 0.25 0.27 0.25 323 0.10 Worker Trips Building Construction Forklifts Forklifts 0.26 0.22 1.35 2.44 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.12 198 0.06 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.49 0.41 2.70 3.93 0.00 0.31 0.28 0.31 0.28 369 0.11 Worker Trips ---PAGE BREAK--- Summary of Construction Emissions (lb/day) Localized Emissions TOG ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 FPM10 FPM2.5 Ov_PM10 Ov_PM2.5 CO2 CH4 Demolition 1.33 1.00 7.06 9.90 0.01 0.58 0.54 1.54 0.53 2.12 1.06 816 0.22 Grading 3.81 3.20 21.83 34.76 0.02 1.87 1.72 3.47 1.68 5.34 3.40 2466 0.73 Trenching 1.35 1.14 6.48 14.02 0.01 0.62 0.57 0.62 0.57 1321 0.39 Paving 1.50 1.24 7.18 11.33 0.01 0.86 0.79 0.86 0.79 987 0.28 Building Construction 0.75 0.63 4.05 6.37 0.01 0.44 0.41 0.44 0.41 567 0.17 ---PAGE BREAK--- Summary of Construction Emissions (lb/day) Regional Emissions TOG ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 Demolition 1.36 1.02 7.49 10.18 0.01 2.14 1.07 952.66 0.22 Grading 3.85 3.23 22.46 35.25 0.03 5.37 3.41 2680.46 0.74 Trenching 1.36 1.14 6.75 14.05 0.01 0.63 0.58 1385.03 0.39 Paving 1.51 1.25 7.59 11.37 0.01 0.87 0.80 1082.83 0.29 Building Construction 0.77 0.64 4.41 6.41 0.01 0.45 0.41 651.96 0.17 ---PAGE BREAK--- CalEEMod Emissions factors based on OFFROAD 2011 model (g/bhp‐hr) Equipment Type Year Low High TOG ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 AerialLifts 2014 6 15 0.31 0.261 3.233 4.09559 0.0054 0.1577 0.1451 574.6647 0.1698 AerialLifts 2014 16 25 0.31 0.261 3.233 4.09559 0.0054 0.1577 0.1451 574.6647 0.1698 AerialLifts 2014 26 50 0.31 0.261 3.233 4.09559 0.0054 0.1577 0.1451 574.6647 0.1698 AerialLifts 2014 51 120 0.2408 0.202 3.22 3.37278 0.0049 0.1608 0.1479 516.7028 0.1527 AerialLifts 2014 251 500 0.2811 0.236 0.983 4.60231 0.0049 0.1012 0.0931 516.6375 0.1527 AerialLifts 2014 501 750 40.165 0.299 1.178 3.761 0.005 0.109 0.109 568.299 0.027 AirCompressors 2014 6 15 2.324 0.891 3.723 5.445 0.008 0.341 0.341 568.3 0.08 AirCompressors 2014 16 25 5.008 0.96 2.78 5 0.007 0.291 0.291 568.299 0.086 AirCompressors 2014 26 50 16.691 2.076 6.181 5.421 0.007 0.505 0.505 568.299 0.187 AirCompressors 2014 51 120 15.28 0.901 3.88 5.608 0.006 0.495 0.495 568.299 0.081 AirCompressors 2014 121 175 19.856 0.621 3.227 4.973 0.006 0.272 0.272 568.299 0.056 AirCompressors 2014 176 250 19.194 0.405 1.237 4.399 0.006 0.134 0.134 568.299 0.036 AirCompressors 2014 251 500 31.25 0.373 1.249 3.855 0.005 0.125 0.125 568.299 0.033 AirCompressors 2014 501 750 48.868 0.378 1.249 3.991 0.005 0.128 0.128 568.299 0.034 AirCompressors 2014 751 1000 78.19 0.445 1.493 5.512 0.005 0.157 0.157 568.3 0.04 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 6 15 0.9925 0.834 4.691 5.33236 0.0056 0.3818 0.3513 591.4418 0.1748 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 16 25 0.9925 0.834 4.691 5.33236 0.0056 0.3818 0.3513 591.4418 0.1748 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 26 50 0.9925 0.834 4.691 5.33236 0.0056 0.3818 0.3513 591.4418 0.1748 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 51 120 0.3795 0.319 3.327 4.19515 0.0047 0.2491 0.2292 501.365 0.1482 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 121 175 0.3664 0.308 3.04 4.06571 0.0049 0.186 0.1711 524.0522 0.1549 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 176 250 0.2586 0.217 1.174 3.52453 0.0048 0.1049 0.0965 512.3362 0.1514 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 251 500 0.2402 0.202 1.239 3.18617 0.0048 0.1009 0.0929 506.1536 0.1496 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 501 750 0.1867 0.157 1.087 2.37324 0.005 0.0805 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.1552 Bore/DrillRigs 2014 751 1000 0.125 0.105 0.951 2.98435 0.0049 0.0583 0.0536 516.5998 0.1527 CementandMortarMixers 2014 6 15 1.082 0.666 3.469 4.191 0.008 0.177 0.177 568.299 0.06 CementandMortarMixers 2014 16 25 3.783 0.837 2.57 4.793 0.007 0.253 0.253 568.299 0.075 Concrete/IndustrialSaws 2014 16 25 1.532 0.685 2.339 4.332 0.007 0.164 0.164 568.299 0.061 Concrete/IndustrialSaws 2014 26 50 6.665 1.626 5.313 5.172 0.007 0.424 0.424 568.299 0.146 Concrete/IndustrialSaws 2014 51 120 7.539 0.749 3.675 5.16 0.006 0.412 0.412 568.299 0.067 Concrete/IndustrialSaws 2014 121 175 11.238 0.517 3.08 4.531 0.006 0.228 0.228 568.299 0.046 Cranes 2014 26 50 2.5167 2.115 7.126 6.09324 0.0053 0.6073 0.5587 567.0058 0.1676 Cranes 2014 51 120 1.4815 1.245 4.923 10.3017 0.0048 0.7649 0.7037 514.0286 0.1519 Cranes 2014 121 175 0.9442 0.793 3.932 8.47052 0.0049 0.457 0.4205 519.5114 0.1535 Cranes 2014 176 250 0.7863 0.661 2.726 7.86026 0.0049 0.3603 0.3314 517.6833 0.153 Cranes 2014 251 500 0.5747 0.483 4.177 6.26415 0.0049 0.2596 0.2388 516.5784 0.1527 Cranes 2014 501 750 0.3331 0.28 1.635 4.32737 0.0049 0.1507 0.1387 515.6071 0.1524 Cranes 2014 1001 9999 0.1433 0.12 0.948 2.28075 0.0049 0.0544 0.05 516.6375 0.1527 CrawlerTractors 2014 26 50 3.0003 2.521 8.047 6.39578 0.0053 0.7434 0.6839 564.5641 0.1668 CrawlerTractors 2014 51 120 1.0516 0.884 4.168 7.52434 0.0049 0.6285 0.5782 522.1187 0.1543 CrawlerTractors 2014 121 175 0.7483 0.629 3.459 6.87548 0.0049 0.3743 0.3443 516.4039 0.1526 CrawlerTractors 2014 176 250 0.5404 0.454 1.838 6.23751 0.0049 0.2411 0.2218 518.0363 0.1531 CrawlerTractors 2014 251 500 0.4905 0.412 2.911 5.61601 0.0049 0.2172 0.1998 520.5153 0.1538 CrawlerTractors 2014 501 750 0.4127 0.347 1.675 4.89468 0.0049 0.1786 0.1643 517.8612 0.153 CrawlerTractors 2014 751 1000 0.5656 0.475 2.08 7.42576 0.0049 0.2182 0.2007 520.0052 0.1537 Dumpers/Tenders 2014 16 25 0.842 0.705 2.364 4.433 0.007 0.2 0.2 568.3 0.063 Excavators 2014 16 25 0.9819 0.825 4.844 4.96504 0.0054 0.3802 0.3498 575.2674 0.17 Excavators 2014 26 50 0.9819 0.825 4.844 4.96504 0.0054 0.3802 0.3498 575.2674 0.17 Excavators 2014 51 120 0.6105 0.513 3.663 5.13137 0.0048 0.3824 0.3518 511.3057 0.1511 Excavators 2014 121 175 0.4642 0.39 3.154 4.65701 0.0049 0.2289 0.2106 516.9066 0.1528 Excavators 2014 176 250 0.3501 0.294 1.346 4.37384 0.0049 0.1388 0.1277 517.3234 0.1529 Excavators 2014 251 500 0.2769 0.233 1.327 3.35284 0.0049 0.108 0.0994 515.2151 0.1523 Excavators 2014 501 750 0.2841 0.239 1.347 3.54089 0.0048 0.1143 0.1052 511.9453 0.1513 Forklifts 2014 26 50 2.5152 2.114 7.321 6.00609 0.0054 0.6563 0.6038 575.1123 0.17 Forklifts 2014 51 120 0.9455 0.795 4.079 6.84833 0.0049 0.5737 0.5278 516.0617 0.1525 Forklifts 2014 121 175 0.6881 0.578 3.521 6.35205 0.0049 0.3451 0.3175 516.694 0.1527 Forklifts 2014 176 250 0.7315 0.615 2.501 7.27612 0.0049 0.3301 0.3037 518.0284 0.1531 Forklifts 2014 251 500 0.6442 0.541 4.252 6.35258 0.0049 0.2891 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.1532 GeneratorSets 2014 6 15 2.081 0.783 3.723 5.369 0.008 0.298 0.298 568.299 0.07 GeneratorSets 2014 16 25 3.767 0.821 2.78 5 0.007 0.272 0.272 568.299 0.074 GeneratorSets 2014 26 50 11.368 1.427 4.683 5.048 0.007 0.389 0.389 568.299 0.128 GeneratorSets 2014 51 120 14.638 0.721 3.532 5.147 0.006 0.385 0.385 568.299 0.065 GeneratorSets 2014 121 175 17.974 0.486 2.945 4.565 0.006 0.212 0.212 568.299 0.043 GeneratorSets 2014 176 250 17.205 0.311 1.13 4.025 0.006 0.111 0.111 568.3 0.028 GeneratorSets 2014 251 500 24.516 0.279 1.157 3.603 0.005 0.104 0.104 568.299 0.025 GeneratorSets 2014 501 750 40.956 0.289 1.157 3.724 0.005 0.106 0.106 568.299 0.026 GeneratorSets 2014 1001 9999 106.13 0.389 1.377 5.15 0.005 0.138 0.138 568.299 0.035 ---PAGE BREAK--- Graders 2014 26 50 3.6818 3.094 9.065 6.54967 0.005 0.8672 0.7978 539.1216 0.1593 Graders 2014 51 120 1.5105 1.269 4.92 9.98567 0.0048 0.832 0.7654 515.3819 0.1523 Graders 2014 121 175 1.0079 0.847 3.951 8.70206 0.005 0.4884 0.4493 527.8337 0.156 Graders 2014 176 250 0.4639 0.39 1.462 5.73998 0.0049 0.1853 0.1705 522.3298 0.1544 Graders 2014 251 500 0.3738 0.314 1.791 3.71371 0.0049 0.1427 0.1313 517.3766 0.1529 Graders 2014 501 750 17.784 0.437 1.483 3.876 0.005 0.138 0.138 568.299 0.039 Off‐HighwayTractors 2014 51 120 0.8308 0.698 3.972 6.28073 0.0049 0.5133 0.4723 520.8244 0.1539 Off‐HighwayTractors 2014 121 175 0.5048 0.424 3.265 5.02525 0.0049 0.2577 0.2371 518.1639 0.1531 Off‐HighwayTractors 2014 176 250 0.4816 0.405 1.628 5.66092 0.0049 0.2031 0.1869 514.3699 0.152 Off‐HighwayTractors 2014 501 750 0.3172 0.267 1.334 4.00651 0.0049 0.133 0.1223 516.904 0.1528 Off‐HighwayTractors 2014 751 1000 0.1007 0.085 0.947 2.27938 0.0049 0.0543 0.0499 516.6375 0.1527 Off‐HighwayTrucks 2014 121 175 0.6102 0.513 3.473 5.21922 0.0048 0.2921 0.2688 514.0574 0.1519 Off‐HighwayTrucks 2014 176 250 0.5747 0.483 1.932 5.4411 0.0048 0.2355 0.2166 512.8333 0.1515 Off‐HighwayTrucks 2014 251 500 0.4682 0.393 2.075 4.68575 0.0049 0.1795 0.1652 521.0573 0.154 Off‐HighwayTrucks 2014 501 750 0.577 0.485 2.953 5.57816 0.0049 0.2307 0.2123 521.2295 0.154 Off‐HighwayTrucks 2014 751 1000 0.4933 0.415 1.779 6.36534 0.0049 0.1872 0.1723 516.9385 0.1528 OtherConstructionEquipment 2014 6 15 1.5479 1.301 5.602 5.56546 0.0054 0.5023 0.4621 578.9591 0.1711 OtherConstructionEquipment 2014 16 25 1.5479 1.301 5.602 5.56546 0.0054 0.5023 0.4621 578.9591 0.1711 OtherConstructionEquipment 2014 26 50 1.5479 1.301 5.602 5.56546 0.0054 0.5023 0.4621 578.9591 0.1711 OtherConstructionEquipment 2014 51 120 0.8669 0.729 3.906 6.63282 0.0049 0.5177 0.4763 515.2847 0.1523 OtherConstructionEquipment 2014 121 175 0.6742 0.567 3.385 6.37185 0.0048 0.3332 0.3065 514.5518 0.1521 OtherConstructionEquipment 2014 251 500 0.3922 0.33 2.476 4.5608 0.0049 0.168 0.1546 520.9444 0.1539 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 6 15 1.8101 1.521 6.288 5.58361 0.0054 0.5439 0.5004 575.8705 0.1702 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 16 25 1.8101 1.521 6.288 5.58361 0.0054 0.5439 0.5004 575.8705 0.1702 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 26 50 1.8101 1.521 6.288 5.58361 0.0054 0.5439 0.5004 575.8705 0.1702 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 51 120 0.9386 0.789 4.09 6.72277 0.0048 0.5739 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.152 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 121 175 0.6219 0.523 3.469 5.79166 0.0049 0.3118 0.2868 516.4138 0.1526 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 176 250 0.5803 0.488 2.054 6.15263 0.0049 0.2546 0.2342 517.9164 0.153 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 251 500 0.4222 0.355 2.499 4.56494 0.0049 0.1724 0.1587 517.5945 0.153 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 501 750 0.3044 0.256 1.489 3.62195 0.0049 0.1153 0.1061 518.1798 0.1531 OtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 2014 751 1000 0.4121 0.346 1.08 6.37883 0.0049 0.1668 0.1534 516.6375 0.1527 OtherMaterialHandlingEquipment 2014 26 50 2.0175 1.695 6.59 5.75119 0.0054 0.5751 0.5291 573.1702 0.1694 OtherMaterialHandlingEquipment 2014 51 120 0.664 0.558 3.779 5.37202 0.0049 0.4122 0.3792 518.3162 0.1532 OtherMaterialHandlingEquipment 2014 121 175 0.6287 0.528 3.431 5.79759 0.0049 0.3128 0.2877 516.8178 0.1527 OtherMaterialHandlingEquipment 2014 176 250 0.5654 0.475 1.936 6.17254 0.0049 0.2421 0.2227 516.0109 0.1525 OtherMaterialHandlingEquipment 2014 251 500 0.3944 0.331 1.927 4.35658 0.0049 0.1689 0.1554 514.7142 0.1521 OtherMaterialHandlingEquipment 2014 1001 9999 0.168 0.141 0.978 3.4363 0.0049 0.0665 0.0612 516.6375 0.1527 Pavers 2014 16 25 2.2589 1.898 6.381 5.71682 0.0054 0.5946 0.547 577.016 0.1705 Pavers 2014 26 50 2.2589 1.898 6.381 5.71682 0.0054 0.5946 0.547 577.016 0.1705 Pavers 2014 51 120 0.813 0.683 3.773 6.19872 0.0048 0.4827 0.4441 514.3769 0.152 Pavers 2014 121 175 0.5979 0.502 3.115 5.73631 0.0049 0.2869 0.2639 516.745 0.1527 Pavers 2014 176 250 0.2474 0.208 1.023 4.14032 0.0049 0.1051 0.0967 518.7225 0.1533 Pavers 2014 251 500 0.2143 0.18 1.005 3.04734 0.0048 0.1012 0.0931 512.1908 0.1514 PavingEquipment 2014 16 25 1.2535 1.053 4.952 5.18385 0.0054 0.4368 0.4019 569.4822 0.1683 PavingEquipment 2014 26 50 1.2535 1.053 4.952 5.18385 0.0054 0.4368 0.4019 569.4822 0.1683 PavingEquipment 2014 51 120 0.8054 0.677 3.837 6.36952 0.0049 0.4858 0.4469 518.0756 0.1531 PavingEquipment 2014 121 175 0.494 0.415 3.097 5.21567 0.0049 0.2488 0.2289 515.0343 0.1522 PavingEquipment 2014 176 250 0.369 0.31 1.37 4.78232 0.0049 0.1584 0.1457 516.8998 0.1527 PlateCompactors 2014 6 15 0.79 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059 PressureWashers 2014 6 15 2.16 0.783 3.723 5.369 0.008 0.298 0.298 568.299 0.07 PressureWashers 2014 16 25 3.308 0.821 2.78 5 0.007 0.272 0.272 568.299 0.074 PressureWashers 2014 26 50 8.833 1.096 3.951 4.873 0.007 0.332 0.332 568.299 0.098 PressureWashers 2014 51 120 8.608 0.634 3.367 4.912 0.006 0.332 0.332 568.299 0.057 PressureWashers 2014 121 175 30.292 0.469 2.923 4.513 0.006 0.206 0.206 568.299 0.042 PressureWashers 2014 176 250 11.167 0.137 0.986 1.047 0.006 0.014 0.014 568.299 0.012 Pumps 2014 6 15 1.942 0.891 3.723 5.445 0.008 0.341 0.341 568.299 0.08 Pumps 2014 16 25 5.492 0.96 2.78 5 0.007 0.291 0.291 568.299 0.086 Pumps 2014 26 50 15.493 1.538 4.929 5.107 0.007 0.409 0.409 568.299 0.138 Pumps 2014 51 120 17.179 0.751 3.587 5.226 0.006 0.403 0.403 568.299 0.067 Pumps 2014 121 175 20.895 0.508 2.989 4.635 0.006 0.222 0.222 568.299 0.045 Pumps 2014 176 250 19.3 0.326 1.149 4.09 0.006 0.115 0.115 568.299 0.029 Pumps 2014 251 500 29.829 0.294 1.181 3.648 0.005 0.108 0.108 568.299 0.026 Pumps 2014 501 750 50.824 0.303 1.181 3.77 0.005 0.11 0.11 568.299 0.027 Pumps 2014 1001 9999 158.96 0.399 1.406 5.21 0.005 0.141 0.141 568.299 0.036 Rollers 2014 6 15 1.5567 1.308 5.243 5.39309 0.0054 0.4836 0.4449 575.7953 0.1702 Rollers 2014 16 25 1.5567 1.308 5.243 5.39309 0.0054 0.4836 0.4449 575.7953 0.1702 Rollers 2014 26 50 1.5567 1.308 5.243 5.39309 0.0054 0.4836 0.4449 575.7953 0.1702 Rollers 2014 51 120 0.8271 0.695 3.809 6.39036 0.0049 0.4759 0.4378 518.7866 0.1533 ---PAGE BREAK--- Rollers 2014 121 175 0.4378 0.368 2.998 4.72375 0.0049 0.2191 0.2016 516.591 0.1527 Rollers 2014 176 250 0.4536 0.381 1.76 5.40344 0.0049 0.1914 0.1761 517.8111 0.153 Rollers 2014 251 500 0.4496 0.378 3.318 5.18322 0.0049 0.2015 0.1854 522.0518 0.1543 RoughTerrainForklifts 2014 26 50 1.4067 1.182 4.887 5.22634 0.0054 0.4359 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.17 RoughTerrainForklifts 2014 51 120 0.4174 0.351 3.367 4.46728 0.0049 0.261 0.2401 517.2602 0.1529 RoughTerrainForklifts 2014 121 175 0.2635 0.221 2.852 3.59442 0.0049 0.1395 0.1283 516.0907 0.1525 RoughTerrainForklifts 2014 176 250 0.2216 0.186 1.212 2.98369 0.0049 0.0871 0.0801 517.7663 0.153 RoughTerrainForklifts 2014 251 500 0.2025 0.17 0.954 3.49973 0.0048 0.0761 0.0701 511.6567 0.1512 RubberTiredDozers 2014 121 175 1.1434 0.961 4.226 9.83401 0.0049 0.5627 0.5177 518.335 0.1532 RubberTiredDozers 2014 176 250 0.8584 0.721 2.712 7.97218 0.0049 0.3925 0.3611 520.0105 0.1537 RubberTiredDozers 2014 251 500 0.8417 0.707 6.165 8.05819 0.0049 0.3757 0.3457 524.6758 0.155 RubberTiredDozers 2014 501 750 0.6106 0.513 2.756 7.14705 0.0049 0.2576 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.153 RubberTiredDozers 2014 751 1000 10.347 0.691 3.096 6.849 0.005 0.236 0.236 568.3 0.062 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 16 25 2.5165 2.115 7.77 6.10324 0.0054 0.6758 0.6217 573.5218 0.1695 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 26 50 2.5165 2.115 7.77 6.10324 0.0054 0.6758 0.6217 573.5218 0.1695 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 51 120 1.0328 0.868 4.268 7.12932 0.0048 0.6189 0.5694 510.0099 0.1507 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 121 175 0.7201 0.605 3.585 6.27196 0.0049 0.3503 0.3223 515.7685 0.1524 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 176 250 0.4839 0.407 1.486 5.49539 0.0048 0.1868 0.1719 514.2167 0.152 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 251 500 0.5012 0.421 2.407 5.19438 0.0048 0.1957 0.1801 512.5095 0.1515 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 501 750 0.4833 0.406 1.946 4.81047 0.0047 0.1901 0.1749 499.6952 0.1477 RubberTiredLoaders 2014 751 1000 0.4923 0.414 1.457 6.69249 0.0049 0.195 0.1794 515.307 0.1523 Scrapers 2014 51 120 0.8556 0.719 4.1 7.0654 0.005 0.5262 0.4841 529.9445 0.1566 Scrapers 2014 121 175 0.8547 0.718 3.807 7.90715 0.0049 0.4188 0.3853 524.1709 0.1549 Scrapers 2014 176 250 0.8829 0.742 3.061 8.81494 0.0048 0.403 0.3707 512.8529 0.1516 Scrapers 2014 251 500 0.5697 0.479 3.898 6.23299 0.0049 0.2514 0.2313 517.3608 0.1529 Scrapers 2014 501 750 0.439 0.369 2.846 5.01248 0.0049 0.1895 0.1744 517.3937 0.1529 SignalBoards 2014 6 15 1.04 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059 SignalBoards 2014 26 50 15.005 1.625 5.231 5.139 0.007 0.422 0.422 568.299 0.146 SignalBoards 2014 51 120 15.539 0.759 3.658 5.186 0.006 0.414 0.414 568.299 0.068 SignalBoards 2014 121 175 20.512 0.52 3.058 4.582 0.006 0.228 0.228 568.299 0.046 SignalBoards 2014 176 250 22.034 0.408 1.402 4.857 0.007 0.141 0.141 686.695 0.036 SkidSteerLoaders 2014 16 25 0.7907 0.664 4.016 4.54075 0.0054 0.2856 0.2628 577.0757 0.1705 SkidSteerLoaders 2014 26 50 0.7907 0.664 4.016 4.54075 0.0054 0.2856 0.2628 577.0757 0.1705 SkidSteerLoaders 2014 51 120 0.3619 0.304 3.338 4.0133 0.0049 0.2345 0.2158 517.0621 0.1528 SurfacingEquipment 2014 26 50 1.358 1.141 4.877 5.42525 0.0055 0.4342 0.3995 582.7249 0.1722 SurfacingEquipment 2014 51 120 0.6653 0.559 3.58 5.52029 0.0049 0.3908 0.3595 516.3377 0.1526 SurfacingEquipment 2014 121 175 0.5619 0.472 3.012 5.71146 0.0049 0.2727 0.2508 515.8203 0.1524 SurfacingEquipment 2014 176 250 0.3642 0.306 1.434 5.10182 0.0049 0.1493 0.1374 521.4518 0.1541 SurfacingEquipment 2014 251 500 0.2821 0.237 1.501 3.8952 0.0048 0.1255 0.1155 513.6157 0.1518 SurfacingEquipment 2014 501 750 0.2068 0.174 1.02 3.28435 0.0049 0.1032 0.0949 516.3212 0.1526 Sweepers/Scrubbers 2014 6 15 2.1034 1.767 6.592 5.75157 0.0054 0.6028 0.5546 574.9427 0.1699 Sweepers/Scrubbers 2014 16 25 2.1034 1.767 6.592 5.75157 0.0054 0.6028 0.5546 574.9427 0.1699 Sweepers/Scrubbers 2014 26 50 2.1034 1.767 6.592 5.75157 0.0054 0.6028 0.5546 574.9427 0.1699 Sweepers/Scrubbers 2014 51 120 0.9909 0.833 4.071 6.93387 0.0049 0.6104 0.5615 518.8933 0.1533 Sweepers/Scrubbers 2014 121 175 1.0419 0.875 4.042 9.10792 0.0049 0.5033 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.153 Sweepers/Scrubbers 2014 176 250 0.6005 0.505 2.066 6.70399 0.0048 0.2653 0.2441 514.5271 0.152 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2014 16 25 1.5895 1.336 5.772 5.36869 0.0053 0.4882 0.4491 564.0421 0.1667 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2014 26 50 1.5895 1.336 5.772 5.36869 0.0053 0.4882 0.4491 564.0421 0.1667 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2014 51 120 0.6928 0.582 3.827 5.58081 0.0049 0.4384 0.4033 523.0168 0.1546 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2014 121 175 0.5033 0.423 3.239 4.93788 0.0048 0.2483 0.2285 513.8903 0.1519 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2014 176 250 0.3891 0.327 1.376 4.92175 0.0049 0.1587 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.1522 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2014 251 500 0.3716 0.312 1.878 4.48819 0.0049 0.1518 0.1397 517.1237 0.1528 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2014 501 750 0.3626 0.305 1.833 4.24344 0.0048 0.1536 0.1413 511.3367 0.1511 Trenchers 2014 6 15 1.5089 1.268 5.293 5.45539 0.0054 0.5005 0.4605 577.7275 0.1707 Trenchers 2014 16 25 1.5089 1.268 5.293 5.45539 0.0054 0.5005 0.4605 577.7275 0.1707 Trenchers 2014 26 50 1.5089 1.268 5.293 5.45539 0.0054 0.5005 0.4605 577.7275 0.1707 Trenchers 2014 51 120 0.9736 0.818 3.999 7.2172 0.0049 0.5629 0.5179 520.7658 0.1539 Trenchers 2014 121 175 0.8244 0.693 3.668 7.69921 0.0048 0.3951 0.3635 512.1475 0.1513 Trenchers 2014 176 250 0.5912 0.497 2.07 6.48427 0.0049 0.2579 0.2372 517.7188 0.153 Trenchers 2014 251 500 0.364 0.306 2.035 4.37019 0.0048 0.1611 0.1482 513.7439 0.1518 Trenchers 2014 501 750 0.14 0.118 0.964 1.825 0.0049 0.0613 0.0564 519.6576 0.1536 Welders 2014 6 15 2.237 0.891 3.723 5.445 0.008 0.341 0.341 568.3 0.08 Welders 2014 16 25 4.381 0.96 2.78 5 0.007 0.291 0.291 568.299 0.086 Welders 2014 26 50 19.935 1.9 5.749 5.308 0.007 0.473 0.473 568.3 0.171 Welders 2014 51 120 13.552 0.849 3.774 5.481 0.006 0.464 0.464 568.299 0.076 Welders 2014 121 175 23.067 0.581 3.141 4.862 0.006 0.255 0.255 568.299 0.052 Welders 2014 176 250 18.135 0.376 1.207 4.297 0.006 0.128 0.128 568.299 0.034 Welders 2014 251 500 23.294 0.343 1.227 3.788 0.005 0.119 0.119 568.299 0.031 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction Emissions with Mitigation ---PAGE BREAK--- Tier 4 Emission Factors (CalEEMod Appendix D) Low hp Hhigph ROG CO Nox PM10 PM2.5 10 49 0.12 4.10 2.75 0.008 0.008 50 74 0.12 3.70 2.74 0.008 0.008 75 119 0.06 3.70 0.26 0.008 0.008 120 174 0.06 3.70 0.26 0.008 0.008 175 299 0.06 2.20 0.26 0.008 0.008 300 599 0.06 2.20 0.26 0.008 0.008 600 750 0.06 2.20 0.26 0.008 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 0.06 2.60 2.24 0.016 0.016 ---PAGE BREAK--- Localized Emissions (lb/day) ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 FPM10 FPM2.5 Ov_PM10 Ov_PM2.5 CO2 CH4 Demolition Total Volume(30,000 cu. Ft) Daily Volume (3,000 cu.ft) 0.10 4.84 0.91 0.01 0.01 0.01 1.54 0.53 1.55 0.54 816 0.22 On Road Travel (138.59 miles) Concrete/Industrial Saw Concrete/IndustrialSaws 0.02 0.84 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117 0.01 Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers 0.04 1.39 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.51 0.37 0.52 0.38 330 0.10 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.04 2.61 0.18 0.00 0.01 0.01 1.03 0.16 1.03 0.16 369 0.11 Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Daily Grading (0.2 acre) Total Excavation (1000 cu.yd) Import (NA) Export (1000 cu. Yd) Total Acre Disturbed (1.16) Max (0.2 acre) On‐Site Cut/fill (1000 cu. Yd/day) On‐Road Truck Travel (500 miles) 0.23 11.28 0.98 0.02 0.03 0.03 3.47 1.68 3.50 1.71 2466 0.73 Grader Graders 0.00 0.50 0.05 0.50 0.05 498 0.15 Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers 0.11 3.96 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.01 2.05 1.48 2.06 1.50 944 0.28 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.04 2.61 0.18 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.93 0.14 0.93 0.15 369 0.11 Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment 0.08 4.71 0.33 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 656 0.19 Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching 0.15 7.31 0.66 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1321 0.39 Excavators Excavators 0.07 4.17 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 582 0.17 xcavators xcavators 0.07 4. 7 0. 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58 0. 7 Other General Industrial EquOtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment 0.09 3.14 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 739 0.22 Worker Trips Paving Acres to be paved (0.6 acre) 0.12 7.04 0.68 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 987 0.28 Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers 0.01 0.30 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 0.00 Paver Pavers 0.04 2.40 0.17 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 333 0.10 Roller Rollers 0.03 2.06 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289 0.09 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.04 2.28 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 323 0.10 Worker Trips Building Construction Total Amout to be Paved (0.6 acre) 0.07 4.03 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 567 0.17 Forklifts Forklifts 0.02 1.42 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 198 0.06 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.04 2.61 0.18 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 369 0.11 Worker Trips Localized Emisssions (lb/day) ---PAGE BREAK--- Localized Emissions (lb/day) ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 FPM10 FPM2.5 Ov_PM10 Ov_PM2.5 CO2 CH4 Summary of Emissions by Phase ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 FPM10 FPM2.5 Ov_PM10 Ov_PM2.5 CO2 CH4 Demolition 0.10 4.84 0.91 0.01 0.01 0.01 1.54 0.53 1.55 0.54 816 0.22 Grading 0.23 11.28 0.98 0.02 0.03 0.03 3.47 1.68 3.50 1.71 2466 0.73 Trenching 0.15 7.31 0.66 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1321 0.39 Paving 0.12 7.04 0.68 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 987 0.28 Building Construction 0.07 4.03 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 567 0.17 ---PAGE BREAK--- Demolition Total Volume(30,000 cu. Ft) Daily Volume (3,000 cu.ft) On Road Travel (138.59 miles) Concrete/Industrial Saw Concrete/IndustrialSaws Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Grading Daily Grading (0.2 acre) Total Excavation (1000 cu.yd) Impo Total Acre Disturbed (1.16) Max (0.2 acre) On‐Site Cut/fill On‐Road Truck Travel (500 miles) Grader Graders Rubber Tire Dozer RubberTiredDozers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Water Truck OtherConstructionEquipment Water Truck Worker Trips Haul Truck Trips Trenching Excavators Excavators Regional Emissions (lb/day) ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 0.12 5.26 1.19 0.01 1.57 0.55 953 0.22 0.02 0.84 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 117 0.01 0.04 1.39 0.16 0.00 0.52 0.38 330 0.10 0.04 2.61 0.18 0.00 1.03 0.16 369 0.11 0.01 0.36 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.00 85 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 51 0.00 0.26 11.91 1.47 0.03 3.53 1.72 2680 0.74 0.00 0.50 0.05 498 0.15 0.11 3.96 0.47 0.01 2.06 1.50 944 0.28 0.04 2.61 0.18 0.00 0.93 0.15 369 0.11 0.08 4.71 0.33 0.01 0.01 0.01 656 0.19 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15 0.00 0.01 0.45 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 106 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.44 0.00 0.01 0.01 93 0.00 0.16 7.58 0.69 0.01 0.03 0.02 1385 0.39 0.07 4.17 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.01 582 0.17 xcavators xcavators Other General Industrial EquOtherGeneralIndustrialEquipment Worker Trips Paving Acres to be paved (0.6 acre) Cement/Mortar Mixers CementandMortarMixers Paver Pavers Roller Rollers Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips Building Construction Total Amout to be Paved (0.6 acre) Forklifts Forklifts Tractor/Loader/Backhoe Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Worker Trips 0.07 4. 7 0. 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 58 0. 7 0.09 3.14 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.01 739 0.22 0.01 0.27 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 64 0.00 0.13 7.45 0.72 0.01 0.03 0.02 1083 0.29 0.01 0.30 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 0.00 0.04 2.40 0.17 0.00 0.01 0.01 333 0.10 0.03 2.06 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 289 0.09 0.04 2.28 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 323 0.10 0.01 0.41 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 96 0.00 0.07 4.39 0.32 0.01 0.02 0.01 652 0.17 0.02 1.42 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 198 0.06 0.04 2.61 0.18 0.00 0.01 0.01 369 0.11 0.01 0.36 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.00 85 0.00 Regional Emissions (lb/day) ---PAGE BREAK--- Summary of Emissions by Phase Demolition Grading Trenching Paving Building Construction Regional Emissions (lb/day) ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 0.12 5.26 1.19 0.01 1.57 0.55 952.66 0.22 0.26 11.91 1.47 0.03 3.53 1.72 2680.46 0.74 0.16 7.58 0.69 0.01 0.03 0.02 1385.03 0.39 0.13 7.45 0.72 0.01 0.03 0.02 1082.83 0.29 0.07 4.39 0.32 0.01 0.02 0.01 651.96 0.17 ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix B Biological Technical Letter, Ball Road/Sunkist, Harmsworth Associates Environmental Consultants, 29 Vacaville, Irvine, CA 92602. Contact: Paul Galvin, M.S. ---PAGE BREAK--- HARMSWORTH ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants 29 Vacaville, Irvine, California 92602 – (714) 389-9527 – Cell (714) 287-4986 – [EMAIL REDACTED] November 15, 2010 Alan Ashimine Environmental Services RBF Consulting 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, CA 92618 Dear Mr. Ashimine, Re: Ball Road/Sunkist This letter report presents the findings of a site assessment and focused nesting bird survey conducted at the Ball Road/Sunkist Road intersection project site, Orange County, California. The survey was conducted under contract to RBF Consultants. On November 9 2010, Harmsworth Associates biologist Brian Karpman, conducted the site assessment and focused nesting bird survey at all portions of the intersection project site. Surveys were conducted during the morning hours when bird activity is highest. The project area consisted almost entirely of existing paved roads and sidewalks, with minimal vegetation present. A small graded area occurred off Ball Road between the shopping area and the 57 freeway off-ramp. This area consisted of dirt ground devoid of vegetation, except around the edges where some non-native grasses (Bromus spp.) and weeds (Brassica spp., Sonchus sp.) occurred, Photograph 1. The vegetation that was present onsite consisted of ornamental landscaping, primarily juniper ground covers, turf and ornamental trees such as bottle brush (Callistemon sp), pines trees (Pinus spp.), London plane trees (Platanus sp.) and eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus spp.); Photographs 2-4. No active bird nests were detected within the site boundaries. The only wildlife present during the site visit were house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). ---PAGE BREAK--- 29 Vacaville, Irvine, California 92602 – (714) 389-9527 – Cell (714) 287-4986 – [EMAIL REDACTED] The project site does not support any native habitats, sensitive habitats, wetlands or streambeds. The site does not support any special status species plant1 or wildlife species2 and has no potential to support any special status species. Currently, there are no biological constraints at the project site; but if construction is delayed until the bird nesting season (February through July); then an additional nesting bird survey should be conducted in the ornamental trees that occur onsite. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (714) 389- 9527. Sincerely Harmsworth Associates Paul Galvin, M.S. Vice President 1 Special status plant species = federal or state listed threatened or endangered species, or proposed endangered, threatened or candidate species, California Native Plant Society Species List (CNPS list 1-4), or otherwise sensitive species. 2 Special status wildlife species = federal or state listed threatened or endangered species, or proposed endangered, threatened or candidate species, or otherwise sensitive species. ---PAGE BREAK--- Photograph 1: Ball Road near the 57 off-ramp showing the graded dirt lot, 9 November 2010. Photograph 2: Ball Road adjacent the shopping area with graded dirt lot in fore-ground, 9 November 2010. 29 Vacaville, Irvine, California 92602 – (714) 389-9527 – Cell (714) 287-4986 – [EMAIL REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- 29 Vacaville, Irvine, California 92602 – (714) 389-9527 – Cell (714) 287-4986 – [EMAIL REDACTED] Photograph 3: Sunkist Road near the Ball Road intersection, 9 November 2010. Photograph 4: Sunkist Road, 9 November 2010. ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C Hazardous Materials Assessment, Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Project, RBF Consulting, 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618. Contact: Ms. Kristen Bogue, CEI, REA ---PAGE BREAK--- PRELIMINARY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT for the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Consultant: RBF CONSULTING 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 92618 Contact: MS. Kristen Bogue, CEI, REA Assessor/Hazardous Materials Specialist [PHONE REDACTED] December 2010 JN 10-107037 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment i December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT 1 1.1 Project 1 1.2 Project Site Characteristics 1 1.3 Proposed Project 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2 3.0 REGULATORY DATABASE 3 4.0 SITE 4 5.0 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS-RELATED 5 6.0 LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER 9 7.0 REFERENCES 10 6.1 List of 10 6.2 10 APPENDIX A – EDR RADIUS MAP REPORT APPENDIX B – OTHER RECORDS ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 1 December 2010 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY This Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment (Assessment) was prepared in an effort to provide preliminary identification of the potential existence of hazardous materials/wastes within the boundaries of the proposed Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements project, herein referenced as the project site. The State of California Legislature enacted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in 1970 that requires public agencies to consider the environmental implications of proposed projects and disclose these findings to the public. CEQA mandates that projects with adverse effects on the environment must implement feasible mitigation. The purpose of this Assessment is to provide technical information pertaining to the existing hazardous materials conditions at the project site in order to support the City of Anaheim, as the Lead Agency for implementing CEQA. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located within the City of Anaheim (City), County of Orange, State of California (Sections 13 and 24, Township 4 South [T.4S], Range 10 West [R.10W], San Bernardino Base and Meridian [SBBM]). Specifically, the project site is located at the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, within the central portion of the City. 1.2 PROJECT SITE CHARACTERISTICS Ball Road (to the west of Sunkist Street) is a four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction) with a striped median. Ball Road (to the east of Sunkist Street) is a six-lane roadway (three lanes in each direction) with a raised median. Sunkist Street (to the north and south of Ball Road) is a four-lane undivided roadway (two lanes in each direction). An on-site vacant dirt lot is located at the eastern portion of the project site, which adjoins an off-site strip-mall commercial center at the northeastern corner of the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street. This vacant lot is located at Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 253-072-18 and -19). The address 2507 E. Ball Road is associated with the northern portion of this vacant lot as well as the adjoining commercial center to the west. On-site topography is approximately 175 feet above mean sea level (msl) and is generally flat (sloping in a southwestern direction). Overall, the project site is primarily situated within a developed area of the City of Anaheim, to the west of the State Route 57 (SR-57)/Ball Road interchange. Surrounding land uses consist of residential and commercial uses. 1.3 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project consists of improvements to the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street in order to increase the capacity of the intersection. Four build Alternatives have been ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 2 December 2010 analyzed to increase the capacity of the intersection. This analysis focuses on Alternative 1 which represents the “worst case” scenario. Alternative 1 includes the widening of Ball Road to the City of Anaheim’s standard cross section for a six-lane Primary Arterial. The proposed cross section includes 10-foot wide sidewalks, 13-foot wide outside lanes, 11-foot wide through lanes, 11-foot wide left-turn lanes, a raised landscaped median of various widths, and a retaining curb at the back of the sidewalk adjacent to the proposed right-turn lane. Alternative 1 would require the maximum width of all of the studied alternatives. This alternative would require a substantial amount of right-of-way acquisition (approximately 9,120 square feet) of 10 adjacent parcels. A total of 32 parking stalls would be displaced from three adjacent parcels in the northeast quadrant of the intersection. These parking stalls would be replaced by 33 proposed parking stalls located within the eastern portion of the property. Additionally, a masonry block wall (approximately 5.5 feet in height) would be required to be reconstructed at the southwest corner of the intersection. Minor widening at the southbound SR-57 on-ramp would also occur. The proposed improvements along Sunkist Street are the same in each alternative. In order to accommodate the additional left turn lane, the section includes 10-foot wide sidewalks, 13-foot wide outside lanes, 11-foot wide through lanes, and 11-foot wide left turn lanes. The overall right-of-way width would be 90 feet and would not require acquisition from adjacent parcels. 2.0 METHODOLOGY RBF has reviewed existing regulatory database information for the project site and surrounding area, considered the existing conditions at the project site (as documented by a site inspection conducted on November 10, 2010), provided a discussion of the project’s potential environmental impacts per the hazardous materials thresholds provided as Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form, of the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines, and suggested feasible mitigation measures, if necessary, to reduce potentially significant effects associated with hazardous materials for the proposed project. This Assessment is intended to address the Hazardous Materials analysis guidelines set forth within Appendix G of the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines. The City of Anaheim will have the primary responsibility for implementing CEQA and making sure that its mandates are followed for this project. For the purposes of this Assessment, the term “hazardous material” refers to both hazardous substances and hazardous waste. A material is defined as “hazardous” if it appears on a list of hazardous materials prepared by a Federal, tribal, State, or local regulatory agency, or if it possesses characteristics defined as “hazardous” by such an agency. A “hazardous waste” is a solid waste that exhibits toxic or hazardous characteristics ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, and/or toxicity). ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 3 December 2010 3.0 REGULATORY DATABASE REVIEW The governmental sources have been searched by EDR (at the request of RBF) for sites within the project site and within an approximate one-mile radius of the project site boundaries. Upon completion of their search, EDR provided RBF with their findings dated November 3, 2010; refer to Appendix A, EDR Radius Map Report. RBF makes no claims as to the completeness or accuracy of the referenced sources. Our review of EDR's findings can only be as current as their listings and may not represent all known or potential hazardous waste or contaminated sites. To reduce the potential for omitting possible hazardous material sites on the project site and within the surrounding area, sites may be listed in this report if there is any doubt as to the location because of discrepancies in map location, zip code, address, or other information. The lists, which were reviewed, identified no regulatory sites within the boundaries of the project site. No known corrective action, restoration, or remediation has been planned, is currently taking place, or has been completed on the project site. The project site has not been under investigation for violation of any environmental laws, regulations, or standards, as identified in the databases reported by EDR. Public records identified 35 listed regulatory sites within a one-mile radius of the project site; refer to Appendix A. The potential for contaminated groundwater to underlie the project site, as a result of these off-site regulatory properties, is considered to be low due to the groundwater flow direction from the project site, distance from project site, and/or the status of the identified sites, which the exception of the following: Arco Gasoline Station (2445 E. Ball Road) – The off-site Arco Gasoline Station, located at 2445 E. Ball Road, adjoins the project site and is situated at the northwest corner of the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street. This off-site regulatory property has reported a leaking underground storage tank (LUST), which is currently undergoing soil remediation and groundwater monitoring per the Regional Water Quality Control Board Based on available files maintained by the (refer to Appendix B, Other Records), the site is currently an active retail gasoline station with a small mini-mart and an auto repair facility. This site maintains three USTs and eight gasoline dispensers. In October 2000, when soil samples were collected during UST, fuel dispenser, and product piping upgrade activities, soil contamination was detected at this site. Soil vapor extraction (SVE) wells and groundwater monitoring wells were later installed in 2001. In January 2004, a permanent SVE system began operation at this site. As of October 12, 2006, the SVE system had operated for approximately 12,898 hours and removed approximately 390 pounds of volatile fuel hydrocarbons (VFH) and 6.1 pounds of methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) from the subsurface. Currently, this case remains open per the Westway Cleaners (2515 E. Ball Road) – The off-site Westway Cleaners is located at 2515 E. Ball Road, at the northeast corner of the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street (in ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 4 December 2010 the strip-mall commercial center), up-gradient of the project site. This address has reported to store, maintain, and/or transport liquids with halogenated organic compounds greater than 1000 milligrams per liter (mg/l) and unspecified solvent mixture waste. The disposal method is reported as Transfer Station and H141. Also, this regulatory property is listed in the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Emissions Inventory Data for the year 1987. According to EDR’s ESA Report Desktop Reference, dated 1996, some reported sites (Orphan Sites) are unmappable as exact locations remain undefined. Listings in publicly available records, which do not have adequate address information, are not generally considered practically reviewable. For the purposes of this Assessment, practically reviewable is defined as information provided in a manner and in a form that yields information without the need for extraordinary analysis of irrelevant data. Although the location of these sites may be unknown, the site and detail information are often available through EDR. RBF’s review of Orphan Sites consisted of a verification that the project site is not listed referenced by name or street address) and a review to identify if any of the Orphan Sites cause a moderate to high potential to contaminate groundwater that underlies the project site. No Orphan Sites are reported within the boundaries of the project site. Also, contaminated groundwater underlying the project site as a result of one or more of the reported off-site Orphan Sites is considered to be low due to the groundwater flow direction, status of the site, and/or the distance from the project site. 4.0 SITE INSPECTION The visual site inspection conducted on November 10, 2010, revealed multiple overhead electrical utility lines throughout the project site. No pole-mounted transformers were observed on-site. Yellow traffic striping was observed along Ball Road and Sunkist Street along the length of the project site. Multiple storm drains, evidence of underground sewer pipelines, and other utilities were noted on-site. RBF also observed a ventilation pipe, which is anticipated to be associated with underground water-related utilities. No structures were noted on-site. No evidence indicating the presence of underground storage tanks (USTs) were noted within the boundaries of the project site. RBF also examined the on-site vacant lot located within the eastern portion of the project site. No evidence indicating historical uses, utilities, or USTs/ASTs were observed during the site inspection. Areas of wet soil were observed and are anticipated to be associated with runoff from the adjoining parking lot to the west. No evidence to suggest the presence of hazardous materials was noted. Asbestos Containing Materials. There are no structures on the project site. Therefore, no asbestos containing materials (ACMs) are likely to be present within the project site. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 5 December 2010 Lead-Based Paints. There are no structures on the project site and, therefore, no associated lead- based paints (LBPs). However, LBPs were commonly used in yellow traffic striping materials before the discontinued use of lead chromate pigment in yellow traffic striping/marking materials and hot-melt Thermoplastic stripe materials (discontinued in 1996 and 2004, respectively). Yellow traffic striping materials were visible along the length of the project site within Ball Road and Sunkist Street during the November 10, 2010 site inspection. Adjoining Uses. Adjoining uses consisted of residential and commercial uses. Commercial uses included an ARCO gasoline station, strip-mall commercial uses (including a dry cleaner facility), and medical/office uses. Based on the site visit, conducted on November 10, 2010, RBF observed evidence of USTs at the off-site ARCO gasoline station. Potential monitoring wells were noted in the vicinity of the ARCO gasoline station, which suggest the potential of a release to groundwater in the vicinity. No other visible or physical evidence was observed to suggest that a surface release of petroleum-based material has recently occurred. No unusual or suspicious materials handling or storage practices were observed with respect to adjacent properties. It should be noted that one on-site pad-mounted transformer was noted adjoining the eastern portion of the project site (within the adjoining parking lot for the off-site commercial center). No staining or leaking in association with the off-site transformer was observed during the site inspection. Also, concrete/soil piles were noted within ornamental landscaping between the project site and SR-57 off-ramp to the east. 5.0 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS-RELATED IMPACTS The following are findings and opinions and are considered preliminary. RBF’s scope of work included a visual site inspection of the project site, conducted on November 10, 2010, in concert with research of available Federal, tribal, State, and local regulatory databases to verify if listed regulatory sites or hazardous wastes have been reported within or near the boundaries of the project site. RBF did not conduct any work to satisfy the conditions of ASTM 1527-05 file reviews, chain-of-title review, building record review, etc.). RBF did not review historical documentation or other available public records other than the Regulatory Database Search provided by EDR. CEQA THRESHOLDS Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines contains analysis guidelines related to the assessment of hazardous materials impacts. These guidelines have been utilized as thresholds of significance for this analysis, per RBF’s identified Scope-of-Services. As stated in Appendix G, a project would create a significant environmental impact if it would: ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 6 December 2010  Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials (refer to Impact Statement HAZ-1);  Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment (refer to Impact Statement HAZ-2);  Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school (refer to Impact Statement HAZ-3); and  Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment (refer to Impact Statement HAZ-4). Based on these standards and thresholds, the effects of the proposed project have been categorized as either a “less than significant impact” or a “potentially significant impact.” Mitigation measures are recommended for potentially significant impacts. HAZ-1 CREATE A SIGNIFICANT HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC OR THE ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE ROUTINE TRANSPORT, USE, OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS? Less Than Significant Impact. The project proposes roadway improvements to the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection, and would not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of substantial quantities of hazardous materials. The only uses on-site that may require the use of hazardous materials would be a new landscaped median along Ball Road. This new landscaped area would require the use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers for regular maintenance, but these chemicals would be utilized periodically and in small quantities. Thus, implementation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. HAZ-2 CREATE A SIGNIFICANT HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC OR THE ENVIRONMENT THROUGH REASONABLY FORESEEABLE UPSET AND ACCIDENT CONDITIONS INVOLVING THE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INTO THE ENVIRONMENT? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is unlikely to result in a release of hazardous materials into the environment. However, during the short- term period of project construction, there is a possibility of accidental release of hazardous substances such as petroleum-based fuels or hydraulic fluid used for construction equipment. The level of risk associated with the accidental release of hazardous substances is not considered significant due to the small volume and low concentration of hazardous materials ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 7 December 2010 utilized during construction. The construction contractor would be required to use standard construction controls and safety procedures that would avoid and minimize the potential for accidental release of such substances into the environment. Standard construction practices would be observed such that any materials released are appropriately contained and remediated as required by local, State, and Federal law. Also, excavation activities within the vicinity of the off-site ARCO gasoline station could result in the exposure of construction workers to hazardous materials in the subsurface. The project would be required to include a Worker Safety Plan for construction worker employees (Mitigation Measure HAZ-1). The Worker Safety Plan would provide information regarding potential chemical and physical hazards that may exist at the site as a result of the ARCO gasoline station and describes safety measures to be followed by field personnel during excavation activities. With implementation of the recommended Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. The off-site dry cleaner facility located at 2515 E. Ball Road (Westway Cleaners) is located within 40 feet up-gradient of the proposed improvements. Also, the enclosed dumpster that serves these strip-mall commercial uses (including the Westway Cleaners) is located within 40- feet cross-gradient of the proposed parking lot area and 100 feet up-gradient of other on-site improvement areas. This reported dry cleaner facility has a moderate to high likelihood of releasing hazardous materials into the groundwater. Due to the high likelihood of a release to the groundwater and the close proximity of this facility from the project site, it is anticipated that contaminated groundwater may underlie the project site as a result of the Westway Cleaners facility. Based on available records from the for the ARCO gasoline station (located approximately 300 feet west of this dry cleaner facility), groundwater has fluctuated from approximately 69 to 96 feet below ground surface (bgs) or more. Due to the nature of the proposed improvements roadway widening improvements and paving of a parking lot), groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during construction activities. Therefore, construction workers are not anticipated to be exposed to groundwater underlying the project site and impacts in this regard are less than significant. Long-term operations at the project site would not result in the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; refer to Impact Statement HAZ-1, above. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1 The project shall include a Worker Safety Plan for construction worker employees. The Worker Safety Plan shall be prepared by a qualified Phase II/Site Characterization Specialist and approved by the Director of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. The Worker Safety Plan shall include information regarding potential chemical and physical hazards that may exist at the site as a result of the ARCO gasoline station located at 2445 E. Ball Road and describe safety measures to be followed by field personnel during clearing and excavation activities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 8 December 2010 HAZ-3 EMIT HAZARDOUS EMISSIONS OR HANDLE HAZARDOUS OR ACUTELY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SUBSTANCES, OR WASTE WITHIN ONE-QUARTER MILE OF AN EXISTING OR PROPOSED SCHOOL? Less Than Significant Impact. Katella High School is situated approximately one-quarter mile northwest of the proposed project site. As stated in Impact Statements HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 above, the proposed project would not result in significant risks related to the use or handling of hazardous materials upon compliance with standard construction practices and local, State, and Federal law. Thus, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. HAZ-4 BE LOCATED ON A SITE WHICH IS INCLUDED ON A LIST OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SITES COMPILED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65962.5 AND, AS A RESULT, WOULD IT CREATE A SIGNIFICANT HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC OR THE ENVIRONMENT? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the State Water Resources Board (SWRB) to compile and update a regulatory sites listing (per the criteria of the Section). Also, the State Department of Health Services is required to compile and update as appropriate, a list of all public drinking water wells that contain detectable levels of organic contaminants and that are subject to water analysis pursuant to Section 116395 of the Health and Safety Code. Section 65962.5 also requires the local enforcement agency, as designated pursuant to Section 18051 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, to compile as appropriate, a list of all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is a known migration of hazardous waste. As part of this analysis, records have been obtained by EDR (which includes databases maintained by the DTSC, State Department of Health Services, and other local enforcement agencies pertaining to solid waste disposal facilities), as well as the SWRB. The lists, which were reviewed, identified no regulatory sites within the boundaries of the project site. No known corrective action, restoration, or remediation has been planned, is currently taking place, or has been completed on the project site. The project site has not been under investigation for violation of any environmental laws, regulations, or standards, as identified in the databases reported by EDR. However, the off-site ARCO gasoline station is listed by the SWRB (under the Santa Ana and the dry cleaners facility, which is listed by the DTSC. The proposed project would require the acquisition of land associated with these two properties. Refer to Impact ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment 9 December 2010 Statement HAZ-2 above, with regard to project impacts as a result of the off-site ARCO gasoline station and dry cleaner facility. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts pertaining to these regulatory properties would be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. 6.0 LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION RBF has performed a this analysis in conformance with the Scope-of-Services for the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project, located in the City of Anaheim, California; also known as the project site within this Assessment. This Assessment is intended to provide the City with information regarding potential Hazardous Materials-related impacts. The City will have the primary responsibility for implementing CEQA and making sure that its mandates are followed for this project. Based on the analysis provided within this Assessment, potential significant impacts from the proposed project related to hazardous materials would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Thus, no significant and unavoidable impacts would result in this regard. 7.0 REFERENCES 7.1 LIST OF PREPARERS RBF CONSULTING 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 95618 949/472-3505 Kristen Bogue, CEI, REA, Assessor/Hazardous Materials Specialist Richard Beck, CEP, CEM, REA, Assessor/Hazardous Materials Specialist 7.2 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Radius Map Report, dated November 3, 2010. 2. Site Inspection, conducted by RBF Consulting on November 10, 2010. 3. State Water Resource Control Board, GeoTracker, accessed November 12, 2010. ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDICES ---PAGE BREAK--- A. EDR RADIUS MAP REPORT ---PAGE BREAK--- FORM-NULL-ROM tr o p e R ™ p a M s u i d a R R D E e h T 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 Toll Free: [PHONE REDACTED] www.edrnet.com Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements NA Anaheim, CA 92806 Inquiry Number: 2911758.1s November 03, 2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 119 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested TC2911758.1s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-[PHONE REDACTED] with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS NA ANAHEIM, CA 92806 COORDINATES 33.818400 - 33˚ 49’ 6.2’’ Latitude (North): 117.880800 - 117˚ 52’ 50.9’’ Longitude (West): Zone 11 Universal Tranverse Mercator: 418484.3 UTM X (Meters): 3742175.8 UTM Y (Meters): 178 ft. above sea level Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 33117-G8 ANAHEIM, CA Target Property Map: 1981 Most Recent Revision: 33117-G7 ORANGE, CA East Map: 1981 Most Recent Revision: TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA ID Database(s) Site BALL ROAD BASIN N/A BALL ROAD ANAHEIM, CA N/A SLIC Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs SCH School Property Evaluation Program Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites CDL Clandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information LUCIS Land Use Control Information System LIENS Environmental Liens Listing DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site List of Industrial Site Cleanups Other Ascertainable Records DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data DOD Department of Defense Sites FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD Records Of Decision UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites MINES Mines Master Index File TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO Radiation Information Database FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan NPDES NPDES Permits Listing ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 WDS Waste Discharge System Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records WIP Well Investigation Program Case List HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data EMI Emissions Inventory Data INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations SCRD State Coalition for Remediation of Listing PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database PROC Certified Processors Database MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing COAL ASH DOE Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database FINANCIAL ASSURANCE Financial Assurance Information Listing EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Historical Auto Stations EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations EDR Historical Cleaners EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. A review of the CERCLIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/29/2010 has revealed that there is 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 CERCLIS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY 2201 E. CERRITOS AVE. SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) M50 81 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation SUPERIOR SPRING CO 1260 S TALT AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) F19 35 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there are 6 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation MULTIPLE PLANT SERVICES INC 1260 S SIMPSON CIR WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.160 mi.) D14 27 TECHNO COATINGS INC 1261 S SIMPSON CIRCLE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) D16 30 OSCARS CLEANERS 2111 BALL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) E18 33 ANAHEIM GEAR AND STANDARD 1271 S TALT AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.221 mi.) F21 39 HARDIN HONDA 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.224 mi.) 22 42 CARLSON DESIGN 1281 S TALT ST SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) F23 45 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. A review of the RESPONSE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/18/2010 has revealed that there is 1 RESPONSE site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation CONTINENTAL MOLDING 1841 N. BATAVIA STREET E 1/2 - 1 (0.962 mi.) 56 97 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/18/2010 has revealed that there are 10 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ANAHEIM UHSD/KATELLA 2200 EAST WAGNER AVENUENW 1/2 - 1 (0.502 mi.) 52 88 Status: No Further Action CONTINENTAL MOLDING 1841 N. BATAVIA STREET E 1/2 - 1 (0.962 mi.) 56 97 Status: Certified GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 2060 NORTH BATAVIA ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.979 mi.) N57 101 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC 2060 N BATAVIA ST ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.979 mi.) N58 102 Status: * Inactive VAN DOREN RUBBER CO, INC. 2095 NORTH BATAVIA ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.992 mi.) 59 117 Status: Refer: Other Agency Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation Not reported 2201 EAST CERRITOS AVE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) M46 72 Status: Active NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO. 2201 E. CERRITOS AVENUE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) M47 77 SUPERIOR PLATING, INC. 1901 E. CERRITOS AVENUE SW 1/2 - 1 (0.570 mi.) 53 92 ITASCO 2211 EAST HOWELL STREET SSW 1/2 - 1 (0.712 mi.) 54 93 Status: Refer: Not reported 1350 N. MAIN STREET SE 1/2 - 1 (0.856 mi.) 55 95 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/20/2010 has revealed that there are 25 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ARCO #6132 2445 E BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A4 10 Status: Completed - Case Closed ARCO #6132 2445 BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A6 17 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ARCO #6132 2445 BALL ROAD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A7 18 Status: Open - Remediation Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation STATEWIDE SALES 1301 SUNKIST ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.008 mi.) B9 22 STATEWIDE SALES 1301 S SUNKIST ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.008 mi.) B11 26 Status: Completed - Case Closed EXXON SERVICE STATION #2218 2180 BALL RD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.) C15 28 MC KESSON DRUG 2121 WINSTON SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.) 27 50 Status: Completed - Case Closed WEST COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY 1445 S SUNKIST ST SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.268 mi.) G29 53 Status: Completed - Case Closed WEST COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY 1445 SUNKIST ST SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.268 mi.) G30 53 RUSSELL INVESTMENTS 2210 E WINSTON RD SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.282 mi.) H31 55 Status: Completed - Case Closed RUSSELL INVESTMENTS 2210 WINSTON RD SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.282 mi.) H32 55 EXXON S/S 7 0732 1198 S STATE COLLEGE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.) I33 56 Status: Completed - Case Closed SHELL #1200 1200 S STATE COLLEGE BL W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.358 mi.) I34 60 Status: Completed - Case Closed MOBIL #18-K3Q 1199 S STATE COLLEGE BL W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) I35 61 Status: Completed - Case Closed MOBIL OIL 1199 STATE COLLEGE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) I36 61 Status: Completed - Case Closed UNOCAL #6220 1201 S STATE COLLEGE BL W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) I37 64 Status: Completed - Case Closed CAC INDUSTRIAL 1323 S STATE COLLEGE BL WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.392 mi.) J38 64 Status: Completed - Case Closed KATELLA YARD 10852 DOUGLASS SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.409 mi.) K39 65 Status: Completed - Case Closed PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC 1350 STATE COLLEGE BLVD WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.411 mi.) J40 67 KATELLA YARD 10852 DOUGLASS RD SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.) K41 69 PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC 1350 S STATE COLLEGE BL SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.436 mi.) 42 69 Status: Open - Remediation ROLLINS TRUCK LEASING 1801 E BALL RD W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.459 mi.) L43 70 Status: Completed - Case Closed ROLLINS TRUCK LEASING 1801 BALL RD W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.459 mi.) L44 70 NEVILLE CHEMICAL 2201 E CERRITOS AVE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) M48 78 Status: Completed - Case Closed NEVILLE CHEMICAL 2201 CERRITOS AVE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) M49 79 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/20/2010 has revealed that there are 2 SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY 2201 CERRITOS AVENUE E SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.489 mi.) M45 71 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO. 2201 E CERRITOS AVE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) M51 86 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/20/2010 has revealed that there are 4 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ARCO #6132 2445 E BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A3 9 Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation STATE WIDE SALES CO INC 1301 S SUNKIST ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.008 mi.) B10 24 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION #7 2222 E BALL RD W 0 - 1/8 (0.111 mi.) C13 27 CARLSON DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2301 E WINSTON RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.) F25 48 AST: The Aboveground Storage Tank database contains registered ASTs. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/01/2009 has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation HARDIN HONDA 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.224 mi.) 22 42 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: The Waste Management Unit Database System is used for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. The source is the State Water Resources Control Board. A review of the WMUDS/SWAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2000 has revealed that there is 1 WMUDS/SWAT site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation MCCLELLAN & SONS I 14812 BALL ROAD E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.268 mi.) 28 51 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites HIST Cal-Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. A review of the HIST Cal-Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there is 1 HIST Cal-Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation CONTINENTAL MOLDING 1841 N. BATAVIA STREET E 1/2 - 1 (0.962 mi.) 56 97 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 5 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ARCO FACILITY NO. 6132 2445 E BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A8 19 Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation STATEWIDE SALES 1301 SUNKIST ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.008 mi.) B9 22 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION # 7 2222 E BALL RD W 0 - 1/8 (0.111 mi.) C12 26 CARLSON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIO 1270 TALT AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) F20 38 CARLSON DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2301 E WINSTON RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.) F26 49 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 3 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ASGHAR ZARINSEFAT 2445 E BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A2 8 Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation STATE WIDE SALES CO INC 1301 S SUNKIST ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.008 mi.) B10 24 FIRE STATION #7 2222 E BALL RD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.) E24 48 SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 5 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ARCO FACILITY NO. 6132 2445 E BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A8 19 Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation STATE WIDE SALES CO INC 1301 S SUNKIST ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.008 mi.) B10 24 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION # 7 2222 E BALL RD W 0 - 1/8 (0.111 mi.) C12 26 CARLSON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIO 1270 TALT AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) F20 38 CARLSON DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2301 E WINSTON RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.) F25 48 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA-NonGen list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-NonGen site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation SENTINEL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 1320 SIMPSON CIRCLE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) D17 32 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 9 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ARCO #6132 2445 BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A6 17 Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation STATEWIDE SALES 1301 SUNKIST ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.008 mi.) B9 22 EXXON SERVICE STATION #2218 2180 BALL RD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.) C15 28 MC KESSON DRUG 2121 WINSTON SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.) 27 50 RUSSELL INVESTMENTS 2210 WINSTON RD SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.282 mi.) H32 55 EXXON S/S 7 0732 1198 S STATE COLLEGE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.) I33 56 KATELLA YARD 10852 DOUGLASS SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.409 mi.) K39 65 PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC 1350 STATE COLLEGE BLVD WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.411 mi.) J40 67 NEVILLE CHEMICAL 2201 CERRITOS AVE SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.) M49 79 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 A list of related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners’ agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/15/2010 has revealed that there are 2 sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation WESTWAY CLEANERS 2515 E BALL RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A5 10 Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Lower Elevation OSCARS CLEANERS 2111 BALL W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) E18 33 HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/09/2010 has revealed that there is 1 HWP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Page Map ID Direction / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC 2060 N BATAVIA ST ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.979 mi.) N58 102 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2911758.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name Database(s) SHELL SERVICE STATION HIST CORTESE JAGUAR LITHO INC DBA J&L IMAGING C HAZNET 1X MCKESSON DRUG CO LUST, CHMIRS, HAZNET ITASCO CERC-NFRAP BURRIS SAND PIT CERC-NFRAP PLACENTA STREET SWEEPER TRANDFER S SWF/LF FORMER TEXACO STATION LUST ARCO #1994 LUST SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US LUST STATION 114 HIST UST TRANSITION ROAD FROM WEST STATE HW ERNS 1261 PLACENTIA STREET US CDL ---PAGE BREAK--- EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. ---PAGE BREAK--- EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. EDR Inc. ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500 CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 CERC-NFRAP Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250 RCRA-LQG 6 NR NR NR 6 0 0.250 RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000 RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 10 NR 8 2 0 0 1.000 ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 25 NR NR 19 1 5 0.500 LUST 2 NR NR 2 0 0 0.500 X SLIC TC2911758.1s Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 4 NR NR NR 1 3 0.250 UST 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250 AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 FEMA UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 INDIAN VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 VCP ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 ODI 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500 WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 INDIAN ODI Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP US CDL 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000 HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 SCH 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP CDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP US HIST CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 5 NR NR NR 2 3 0.250 CA FID UST 3 NR NR NR 1 2 0.250 HIST UST 5 NR NR NR 2 3 0.250 SWEEPS UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP LIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 LUCIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP LIENS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP LDS TC2911758.1s Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP MCS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP Orange Co. Industrial Site Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250 RCRA-NonGen 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 DOD 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 ROD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 UMTRA 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP SSTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP PADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP RAATS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP NPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP WDS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 Cortese 9 NR NR 6 1 2 0.500 HIST CORTESE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 Notify 65 2 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 WIP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP EMI 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 INDIAN RESERV 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 SCRD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 PROC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 HWT 0 NR NR NR NR NR TP FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000 HWP EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000 Manufactured Gas Plants 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 EDR Historical Auto Stations 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 EDR Historical Cleaners TC2911758.1s Page 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC2911758.1s Page 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation XXX Thomas Bros Code: XXX Location Code: XXX Lead Agency: XXX Substance: XXX Staff: 8 Region: Closed Facility Status: Soil and Groundwater Type: SLIC: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Not reported Potential Contaminants of Concern: Not reported Potential Media Affected: Local Agency File Location: Not reported RB Case Number: Not reported Local Agency: Not reported Case Worker: Cleanup Program Site Case Type: -117.892357506847 Longitude: 33.8352185879588 Latitude: SLT8R107 Lead Agency Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY Lead Agency: SLT8R1074156 Global Id: 2009-06-17 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: STATE Region: SLIC: Site 1 of 8 in cluster A Actual: 178 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA Target N/A BALL ROAD N/A A1 SLIC BALL ROAD BASIN S101541095 PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00010000 Tank Capacity: 1973 Year Installed: [PHONE REDACTED] Container Num: 001 Tank Num: LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 Owner City,St,Zip: 515 SOUTH FLOWER STREET Owner Address: ARCO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CO. Owner Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: Not reported Contact Name: 0005 Total Tanks: Not reported Other Type: Gas Station Facility Type: 00000026862 Facility ID: STATE Region: HIST UST: Site 2 of 8 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 2445 E BALL RD N/A A2 HIST UST ASGHAR ZARINSEFAT U001578728 TC2911758.1s Page 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Stock Inventor Leak Detection: 0000093 inches Tank Construction: WASTE OIL Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00000280 Tank Capacity: 1971 Year Installed: [PHONE REDACTED] Container Num: 005 Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10 Leak Detection: 0000240 inches Tank Construction: UNLEADED Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00006000 Tank Capacity: 1971 Year Installed: [PHONE REDACTED] Container Num: 004 Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10 Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: PREMIUM Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00008000 Tank Capacity: 1971 Year Installed: [PHONE REDACTED] Container Num: 003 Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10 Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: UNLEADED Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00008000 Tank Capacity: 1971 Year Installed: [PHONE REDACTED] Container Num: 002 Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10 Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: REGULAR Type of Fuel: ASGHAR ZARINSEFAT (Continued) U001578728 Closed pre 1994, file review required to determine closure type Closure Type: CLOSED 9/21/1992 Current Status: RO0000394 Record ID: ORANGE Region: 92IC046 Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: -117.88142 Longitude: 33.81817 Latitude: 11004 Global ID: UST: Site 3 of 8 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Orange Co. Industrial Site 2445 E BALL RD N/A A3 UST ARCO #6132 U003981908 TC2911758.1s Page 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation WASTE (OR SLOP) OIL Released Chemical: ARCO #6132 (Continued) U003981908 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Gasoline Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Regional Board File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083000052T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: VJB Case Worker: SANTA ANA (REGION 8) Lead Agency: 1993-03-31 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.880966 Longitude: 33.818441 Latitude: T0605900042 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: Site 4 of 8 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 2445 E BALL RD N/A A4 LUST ARCO #6132 S109284288 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: IN SUK SONG Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 4271 MYRA AVE Owner Address: IN SUK SONG Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Inactive Date: Yes Facility Active: 6/16/2005 10:43:00 AM Create Date: Business Services, NEC (apparel pressing service for the trade) SIC Description: 7389 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000295281 EPA Id: Site 5 of 8 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. < 1/8 EMI ANAHEIM, CA 92806 HAZNET 2515 E BALL RD N/A A5 WESTWAY CLEANERS S103995744 TC2911758.1s Page 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 6/16/2005 10:43:00 AM Create Date: Laundry and Garment Services, NEC (except diaper service and clothing alteration and repair) SIC Description: 7219 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000295281 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: CHARLIE SHIN Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Owner Address: CHARLIE SHIN Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: 6/30/2003 Inactive Date: No Facility Active: 2/15/1991 Create Date: Laundry and Garment Services, NEC (except diaper service and clothing alteration and repair) SIC Description: 7219 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000040864 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: IN SUK SONG Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 4271 MYRA AVE Owner Address: IN SUK SONG Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Inactive Date: Yes Facility Active: 6/16/2005 10:43:00 AM Create Date: Garment Pressing, and Agents for Laundries and SIC Description: 7212 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000295281 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: WESTWAY CLEANERS (Continued) S103995744 TC2911758.1s Page 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: 6/30/2003 Inactive Date: No Facility Active: 2/15/1991 Create Date: Plants, Except Rug Cleaning SIC Description: 7216 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000040864 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: CHARLIE SHIN Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Owner Address: CHARLIE SHIN Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: 6/30/2003 Inactive Date: No Facility Active: 2/15/1991 Create Date: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial SIC Description: 7211 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000040864 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: IN SUK SONG Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 4271 MYRA AVE Owner Address: IN SUK SONG Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Inactive Date: Yes Facility Active: WESTWAY CLEANERS (Continued) S103995744 TC2911758.1s Page 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: IN SUK SONG Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 4271 MYRA AVE Owner Address: IN SUK SONG Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Inactive Date: Yes Facility Active: 6/16/2005 10:43:00 AM Create Date: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial SIC Description: 7211 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000295281 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: CHARLIE SHIN Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Owner Address: CHARLIE SHIN Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: 6/30/2003 Inactive Date: No Facility Active: 2/15/1991 Create Date: Business Services, NEC (apparel pressing service for the trade) SIC Description: 7389 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000040864 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: CHARLIE SHIN Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Owner Address: CHARLIE SHIN Owner Name: WESTWAY CLEANERS (Continued) S103995744 TC2911758.1s Page 13 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Facility Addr2: 6/30/1997 Inactive Date: No Facility Active: 5/10/1990 Create Date: Not reported SIC Description: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported NAICS Description: Not reported NAICS Code: CAL000024782 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: CHARLIE SHIN Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Owner Address: CHARLIE SHIN Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: 6/30/2003 Inactive Date: No Facility Active: 2/15/1991 Create Date: Garment Pressing, and Agents for Laundries and SIC Description: 7212 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000040864 EPA Id: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Contact Address: IN SUK SONG Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 4271 MYRA AVE Owner Address: IN SUK SONG Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928060000 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Inactive Date: Yes Facility Active: 6/16/2005 10:43:00 AM Create Date: Plants, Except Rug Cleaning SIC Description: 7216 SIC Code: and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) NAICS Description: 81232 NAICS Code: CAL000295281 EPA Id: WESTWAY CLEANERS (Continued) S103995744 TC2911758.1s Page 14 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/l Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT000613893 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: IN SUK SONG Contact: CAL000295281 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .2293 Tons: Not reported Disposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixture Waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD008252405 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: SANG CHUI SHIN Contact: CAL000040864 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 0.15 Tons: Transfer Station Disposal Method: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/l Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT000613893 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: IN SUK SONG Contact: CAL000295281 Gepaid: HAZNET: Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: INACTIVE-CHANGED OWNER-NK Contact Address: KUN KIM Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: Owner Address: PARK JOHN D Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928065053 Mailing Zip: CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: WESTWAY CLEANERS (Continued) S103995744 TC2911758.1s Page 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: 7216 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: 47877 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1987 Year: EMI: 1 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Orange Facility County: 0.1 Tons: H141 Disposal Method: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/l Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT000613893 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: IN SUK SONG Contact: CAL000295281 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 0.15 Tons: H141 Disposal Method: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/l Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT000613893 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2515 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: IN SUK SONG Contact: CAL000295281 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 0.1 Tons: H141 Disposal Method: WESTWAY CLEANERS (Continued) S103995744 TC2911758.1s Page 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation B MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Tested: 2 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 1 MTBE Concentration: 730 Max MTBE GW: 2/27/2002 MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.81839071 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: = GW Qualifies: 12/31/1986 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: 1/11/2004 Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: 2/19/1987 Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 3/31/1993 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 11/23/1986 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: 11/23/1986 Review Date: 12/31/1986 Enter Date: 11/24/1986 How Stopped Date: T0605900042 Global ID: UNK Leak Source: UNK Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Tank Test How Discovered: State Funds Funding: Not reported Enf Type: SUNKIST Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Gasoline Substance: Soil only Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083000052T Case Number: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: 083000052T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: Site 6 of 8 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 LUST 2445 BALL RD N/A A6 HIST CORTESE ARCO #6132 S102424428 TC2911758.1s Page 17 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation CONTMAINATION. PRODUCT LINE FAILED TIGHTNESS TESTING, REPAIRED, PASSED, NO EVIDENCE OF SOIL Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Regional Board Lead Agency: ROW Staff Initials: VJJ Staff: ARCO #6132 (Continued) S102424428 T0605999287 Global ID: UNK Leak Source: UNK Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Tank Closure How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: SUNLIST Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Gasoline Substance: Soil only Case Type: 083003783T Local Case Num: 083003783T Case Number: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Gasoline Potential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supply Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: 083003783T LOC Case Number: 083003783T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: RM Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 2009-03-27 00:00:00 Status Date: Open - Remediation Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.881019 Longitude: 33.818701554 Latitude: T0605999287 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: Site 7 of 8 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 2445 BALL ROAD N/A A7 LUST ARCO #6132 S105050769 TC2911758.1s Page 18 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Haz Mat incident report filed : NORTHWEST CORNER OF BALL AND SUNKIST Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: RM Staff Initials: VJJ Staff: B MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Tested: 1 MTBE Fuel: 68 Max MTBE Soil: 5 MTBE Concentration: 3200 Max MTBE GW: 9/10/2001 MTBE Date: -117.881019 Longitude: 33.81870155 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: = Soil Qualifies: = GW Qualifies: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: 1/27/2005 Remed Action: 11/5/2003 Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 10/23/2000 Discover Date: 6/4/2001 Prelim Assess: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Enter Date: 10/23/2000 How Stopped Date: ARCO #6132 (Continued) S105050769 Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM 92805 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 515 S FLOWER ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported Regulated ID: UTNKA Regulated By: 30005321 Facility ID: CA FID UST: Site 8 of 8 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. < 1/8 HAZNET ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SWEEPS UST 2445 E BALL RD N/A A8 CA FID UST ARCO FACILITY NO. 6132 S101589298 TC2911758.1s Page 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADED Content: P Stg: M. V. FUEL Tank Use: 12000 Capacity: 03-19-91 Actv Date: 30-011-004822-000004 Tank Id: TANK-2 Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 05-25-94 Act Date: 03-19-91 Ref Date: 44-000506 Board Of Equalization: 1 Number: 4822 Comp Number: A Status: Not reported Number Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADED Content: P Stg: M. V. FUEL Tank Use: 12000 Capacity: 03-19-91 Actv Date: 30-011-004822-000003 Tank Id: TANK-3 Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 05-25-94 Act Date: 03-19-91 Ref Date: 44-000506 Board Of Equalization: 1 Number: 4822 Comp Number: A Status: 4 Number Of Tanks: WASTE OIL Content: W Stg: OIL Tank Use: 550 Capacity: 03-19-91 Actv Date: 30-011-004822-000001 Tank Id: TANK-4 Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 05-25-94 Act Date: 03-19-91 Ref Date: 44-000506 Board Of Equalization: 1 Number: 4822 Comp Number: A Status: SWEEPS UST: Active Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: ARCO FACILITY NO. 6132 (Continued) S101589298 TC2911758.1s Page 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: RCHO STA MARG, CA 926880000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 80249 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: JACK OMAN WASTE SPECIALIST Contact: CAL000225524 Gepaid: Not reported Facility County: 0 Tons: Transfer Station Disposal Method: Other organic solids Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD008302903 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: RCHO STA MARG, CA 926880000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 80249 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: JACK OMAN WASTE SPECIALIST Contact: CAL000225524 Gepaid: Not reported Facility County: 1.65 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Aqueous solution with less than 10% total organic residues Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ARTESIA, CA 907026038 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 6038 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: JACK OMAN Contact: CAL000225524 Gepaid: HAZNET: Not reported Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADED Content: P Stg: M. V. FUEL Tank Use: 12000 Capacity: 03-19-91 Actv Date: 30-011-004822-000005 Tank Id: TANK-1 Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 05-25-94 Act Date: 03-19-91 Ref Date: 44-000506 Board Of Equalization: 1 Number: 4822 Comp Number: A Status: ARCO FACILITY NO. 6132 (Continued) S101589298 TC2911758.1s Page 21 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 3 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Orange Facility County: 0.231 Tons: H039 Disposal Method: Aqueous solution with less than 10% total organic residues Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2445 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: KAZEM KHOYLOO Contact: CAL000231646 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 0.21 Tons: H141 Disposal Method: Aqueous solution with less than 10% total organic residues Waste Category: San Bernardino TSD County: CAT080025711 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2445 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: KAZEM KHOYLOO Contact: CAL000231646 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 0.12 Tons: H13 Disposal Method: Aqueous solution with less than 10% total organic residues Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: ARCO FACILITY NO. 6132 (Continued) S101589298 083002931T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: 083002931T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: 44 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster B 0.008 mi. HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 176 ft. < 1/8 CA FID UST ANAHEIM, CA 92806 South LUST 1301 SUNKIST ST N/A B9 HIST CORTESE STATEWIDE SALES S101619878 TC2911758.1s Page 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Regulated ID: UTNKA Regulated By: 30003911 Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: ROW Staff Initials: NOM Staff: * MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 2 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8163129 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: 11/27/1996 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: 11/26/1996 Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 1/21/1997 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 10/30/1996 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: 10/30/1996 Review Date: 11/27/1996 Enter Date: 10/30/1996 How Stopped Date: T0605902004 Global ID: UNK Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Tank Closure How Discovered: Not reported Funding: CLOS Enf Type: CERRITOS Cross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose in Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Diesel Substance: Soil only Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: STATEWIDE SALES (Continued) S101619878 TC2911758.1s Page 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Orange Facility County: 3.6904 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD099452708 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: LOS ANGELES, CA 900210000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2017 EAST 8TH ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: CORPORATION Contact: CAC001237840 Gepaid: HAZNET: Active Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM 92806 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 1400 VISTA MORAGA Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Cortese Code: STATEWIDE SALES (Continued) S101619878 1980 Year Installed: T-1 Container Num: 001 Tank Num: LOS ANGELES, CA 90021 Owner City,St,Zip: 744 SO. ALAMEDA ST. Owner Address: STATE WIDE SALES CO., INC. Owner Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: FRANK LARA Contact Name: 0002 Total Tanks: PRIVATE USE Other Type: Other Facility Type: 00000013709 Facility ID: STATE Region: HIST UST: -117.8806 Longitude: 33.81623 Latitude: 10955 Global ID: UST: 44 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster B 0.008 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 176 ft. < 1/8 SWEEPS UST ANAHEIM, CA 92806 South HIST UST 1301 S SUNKIST ST N/A B10 UST STATE WIDE SALES CO INC U001578888 TC2911758.1s Page 24 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Number Of Tanks: DIESEL Content: P Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 12000 Capacity: 07-10-92 Actv Date: 30-011-004772-000003 Tank Id: Not reported Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 07-10-92 Act Date: 07-08-92 Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: 1 Number: 4772 Comp Number: A Status: 2 Number Of Tanks: DIESEL Content: P Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 5000 Capacity: 07-10-92 Actv Date: 30-011-004772-000001 Tank Id: Not reported Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 07-10-92 Act Date: 07-08-92 Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: 1 Number: 4772 Comp Number: A Status: SWEEPS UST: Visual, Stock Inventor Leak Detection: 5/32 gauge Tank Construction: REGULAR Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00008000 Tank Capacity: 1980 Year Installed: T-2 Container Num: 002 Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor Leak Detection: 5/32 gauge Tank Construction: REGULAR Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00012000 Tank Capacity: STATE WIDE SALES CO INC (Continued) U001578888 TC2911758.1s Page 25 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Diesel Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083002931T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: ROW Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 1997-01-21 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.881739 Longitude: 33.816009 Latitude: T0605902004 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 44 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster B 0.008 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 176 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 South 1301 S SUNKIST ST N/A B11 LUST STATEWIDE SALES S109284578 12-31-88 Created Date: 07-17-92 Act Date: 07-17-92 Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: 4 Number: 6271 Comp Number: A Status: SWEEPS UST: Active Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM 92806 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 200 S ANAHEIM BLVD Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported Regulated ID: UTNKA Regulated By: 30017747 Facility ID: CA FID UST: 584 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster C 0.111 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 174 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West SWEEPS UST 2222 E BALL RD N/A C12 CA FID UST ANAHEIM FIRE STATION # 7 S101589620 TC2911758.1s Page 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 1 Number Of Tanks: DIESEL Content: P Stg: M. V. FUEL Tank Use: 1000 Capacity: 07-17-92 Actv Date: 30-011-006271-000001 Tank Id: Not reported Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: ANAHEIM FIRE STATION # 7 (Continued) S101589620 -117.88499 Longitude: 33.81802 Latitude: 13035 Global ID: UST: 584 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster C 0.111 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 174 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West 2222 E BALL RD N/A C13 UST ANAHEIM FIRE STATION #7 U003937560 Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (714) 635-4070 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1260 S SIMPSON CIR Owner/operator address: MULTIPLE PLANT SVC INC Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Description: Small Small Quantity Generator Classification: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: (714) 635-4070 Contact telephone: US Contact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1260 S SIMPSON CIR Contact address: MIKE TARR Contact: CAD983604331 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1260 S SIMPSON CIR Facility address: MULTIPLE PLANT SERVICES INC Facility name: 07/13/1992 Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 846 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster D 0.160 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 172 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW FINDS 1260 S SIMPSON CIR CAD983604331 D14 RCRA-SQG MULTIPLE PLANT SERVICES INC [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 27 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002859719 Registry ID: FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: MULTIPLE PLANT SERVICES INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] 1000 Qty Leaked: Gasoline Substance: Aquifer affected Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083000146T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: 083000146T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: 852 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster C 0.161 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 173 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West LUST 2180 BALL RD N/A C15 HIST CORTESE EXXON SERVICE STATION #2218 S101299250 TC2911758.1s Page 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: ROW Staff Initials: CAB Staff: Not reported MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Tested: 1 MTBE Fuel: 1 Max MTBE Soil: 2 MTBE Concentration: 10 Max MTBE GW: 12/1/1995 MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.81770698 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: < Soil Qualifies: < GW Qualifies: 5/20/1987 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: 4/27/1992 Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 7/18/1997 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: Not reported Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: 11/9/1990 Review Date: 5/20/1987 Enter Date: Not reported How Stopped Date: T0605900111 Global ID: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: BROOKHURST Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: EXXON SERVICE STATION #2218 (Continued) S101299250 TC2911758.1s Page 29 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: MICHAEL T BIRNEY Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Description: Small Small Quantity Generator Classification: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: (714) 635-1130 Contact telephone: US Contact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1261 S SIMPSON CIRCLE Contact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact: CAD982465585 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1261 S SIMPSON CIRCLE Facility address: TECHNO COATINGS INC Facility name: 11/02/1988 Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 854 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster D 0.162 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 172 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNET ANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW FINDS 1261 S SIMPSON CIRCLE CAD982465585 D16 RCRA-SQG TECHNO COATINGS INC [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 30 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 1 Facility County: 1.0500 Tons: Treatment, Tank Disposal Method: Other inorganic solid waste Waste Category: Kings TSD County: CAT000646117 TSD EPA ID: 1 Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1261 S SIMPSON CIR Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: Not reported Contact: CAD982465585 Gepaid: 1 Facility County: .1125 Tons: Disposal, Other Disposal Method: Other inorganic solid waste Waste Category: Kings TSD County: CAT000646117 TSD EPA ID: 1 Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1261 S SIMPSON CIR Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: Not reported Contact: CAD982465585 Gepaid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110009545590 Registry ID: FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: TECHNO COATINGS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 31 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: Yes Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: ROBERT LEE MAHONEY Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Description: Non-Generator Classification: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: (714) 956-3790 Contact telephone: US Contact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1320 SIMPSON CIRCLE Contact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SIMPSON CIRCLE Mailing address: CAD982461089 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1320 SIMPSON CIRCLE Facility address: SENTINEL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC Facility name: 11/09/1990 Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: 914 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster D 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 171 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW FINDS 1320 SIMPSON CIRCLE CAD982461089 D17 RCRA-NonGen SENTINEL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 32 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002815669 Registry ID: FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: SENTINEL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: OSCAR SANCHEZ Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Description: Small Small Quantity Generator Classification: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: Not reported Contact telephone: Not reported Contact country: Not reported Not reported Contact address: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 BALL Mailing address: CAD981651508 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2111 BALL Facility address: OSCARS CLEANERS Facility name: 09/01/1996 Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1092 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E 0.207 mi. HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 172 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West FINDS 2111 BALL CAD981651508 E18 RCRA-SQG OSCARS CLEANERS [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 33 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation CA Mailing State: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2111 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: 6/30/1997 Inactive Date: No Facility Active: 7/3/1987 Create Date: Not reported SIC Description: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported NAICS Description: Not reported NAICS Code: CAD981651508 EPA Id: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002737753 Registry ID: FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: Unknown Furnace exemption: Unknown On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator name: OSCARS CLEANERS (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 34 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Orange Facility County: .0000 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Not reported Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD981397417 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065127 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2111 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: OSCARS CLEANERS Contact: CAD981651508 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 2.9498 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: etc.) Halogenated solvents (chloroform, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD981397417 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065127 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2111 E BALL RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: OSCARS CLEANERS Contact: CAD981651508 Gepaid: HAZNET: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Telephone: Not reported Contact Address 2: 2111 E BALL RD Contact Address: UNDELIVERABLE PER VF97 AH Contact Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Owner Telephone: Not reported Owner Address 2: 2111 E BALL RD Owner Address: OSCARS CLEANERS Owner Name: 4 Region Code: 928065127 Mailing Zip: OSCARS CLEANERS (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] 1260 S TALT AVE Contact address: BOB D DELONG Contact: CAR000163329 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1260 S TALT AVE Facility address: SUPERIOR SPRING CO Facility name: 06/10/2005 Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1120 ft. Site 1 of 6 in cluster F 0.212 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 170 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SSW HAZNET 1260 S TALT AVE CAR000163329 F19 RCRA-LQG SUPERIOR SPRING CO [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 35 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: 03/01/1996 Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: US Owner/operator country: SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92672 1501 AVENIDA DE NOGALES Owner/operator address: BOB DELONG Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: 03/01/1996 Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: US Owner/operator country: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator address: SUPERIOR SPRING CO Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during any Description: Large Quantity Generator Classification: Private Land type: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact telephone: US Contact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SUPERIOR SPRING CO (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 36 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: BOB D DELONG Contact: CAR000163329 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 1.14675 Tons: H141 Disposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD097030993 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1260 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: BOB D DELONG Contact: CAR000163329 Gepaid: HAZNET: State Evaluation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Generators - General Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 07/09/2008 Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: 07/09/2008 Date violation determined: Generators - General Area of violation: Not reported Regulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS Waste name: D002 Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Commercial status unknown Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: SUPERIOR SPRING CO (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 37 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Orange Facility County: 1.15 Tons: H141 Disposal Method: Other inorganic solid waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD097030993 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1260 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: BOB D DELONG Contact: CAR000163329 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 0.6 Tons: H141 Disposal Method: Other inorganic solid waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD097030993 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928060000 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1260 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: SUPERIOR SPRING CO (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] Not reported Act Date: Not reported Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: Not reported Number: 8725 Comp Number: Not reported Status: SWEEPS UST: Inactive Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM 92815 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2301 E WINSTON RD Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported Regulated ID: UTNKI Regulated By: 30005171 Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1162 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster F 0.220 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 170 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92815 SSW SWEEPS UST 1270 TALT AVE N/A F20 CA FID UST CARLSON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION S101589294 TC2911758.1s Page 38 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADED Content: PRODUCT Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 6000 Capacity: Not reported Actv Date: 30-011-008725-000003 Tank Id: Not reported Owner Tank Id: Not reported Tank Status: Not reported Created Date: Not reported Act Date: Not reported Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: Not reported Number: 8725 Comp Number: Not reported Status: Not reported Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADED Content: PRODUCT Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 6000 Capacity: Not reported Actv Date: 30-011-008725-000002 Tank Id: Not reported Owner Tank Id: Not reported Tank Status: Not reported Created Date: Not reported Act Date: Not reported Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: Not reported Number: 8725 Comp Number: Not reported Status: 3 Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADED Content: PRODUCT Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 6000 Capacity: Not reported Actv Date: 30-011-008725-000001 Tank Id: Not reported Owner Tank Id: Not reported Tank Status: Not reported Created Date: CARLSON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION (Continued) S101589294 S TALT AVE Mailing address: CAR000014043 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1271 S TALT AVE Facility address: ANAHEIM GEAR AND STANDARD Facility name: 07/26/1996 Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1166 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster F 0.221 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 170 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNET ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SSW FINDS 1271 S TALT AVE CAR000014043 F21 RCRA-SQG ANAHEIM GEAR AND STANDARD [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 39 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002913250 Registry ID: FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (714) 778-1103 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1271 S TALT AVE Owner/operator address: PATRICK MASSEY Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Description: Small Small Quantity Generator Classification: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: (714) 778-1103 Contact telephone: US Contact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1271 S TALT AVE Contact address: PATRICK MASSEY Contact: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ANAHEIM GEAR AND STANDARD (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 40 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: PATRICK MASSEY Contact: CAR000014043 Gepaid: Not reported Facility County: 0.68 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080033681 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065533 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1271 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: PATRICK MASSEY Contact: CAR000014043 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 1.7513 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065533 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1271 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: PATRICK MASSEY Contact: CAR000014043 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 2.3851 Tons: Transfer Station Disposal Method: Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.) Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD028409019 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065533 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1271 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: PATRICK MASSEY Contact: CAR000014043 Gepaid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of ANAHEIM GEAR AND STANDARD (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 41 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 14 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Orange Facility County: 1.19 Tons: H039 Disposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oil Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065533 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1271 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: PATRICK MASSEY Contact: CAR000014043 Gepaid: Not reported Facility County: 0.68 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080033681 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065533 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1271 S TALT AVE Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: ANAHEIM GEAR AND STANDARD (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] VICTOR H Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Description: Small Small Quantity Generator Classification: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: Not reported Contact telephone: Not reported Contact country: Not reported Not reported Contact address: Not reported Contact: CAD983600602 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR Facility address: HARDIN HONDA Facility name: 09/01/1996 Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1181 ft. 0.224 mi. HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 172 ft. 1/8-1/4 AST ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE FINDS 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR CAD983600602 22 RCRA-SQG HARDIN HONDA [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 42 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002857196 Registry ID: FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Large Quantity Generator Classification: HARDIN HONDA Facility name: 06/09/1992 Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: Unknown Furnace exemption: Unknown On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (714) 533-6200 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: AHAHEIM, CA 92806 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR Owner/operator address: VICTOR AND DENNIS HARDIN Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (714) 998-0136 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: DANA PT, CA 92629 34300 LANTERN BAY DR Owner/operator address: HARDIN HONDA (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 43 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Unspecified aqueous solution Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD099452708 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065612 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: VICTOR HARDIN Contact: CAD983600602 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 2.9190 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Oil/water separation sludge Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065612 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: VICTOR HARDIN Contact: CAD983600602 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 1.8765 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified aqueous solution Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065612 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: VICTOR HARDIN Contact: CAD983600602 Gepaid: HAZNET: Anaheim Certified Unified Program Agencies: 2,450 Total Gallons: HARDIN HONDA Owner: AST: convenient collection opportunities for used oil and used oil filters. Waste Management Board (CIWMB) helps communities establish and promote UORS (California - Used Oil Recycling System). California Integrated corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA HARDIN HONDA (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 44 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 26 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Orange Facility County: 0.22935 Tons: H039 Disposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065612 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: JOHN YAKEL/SERVICE MGR. Contact: CAD983600602 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .8340 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified aqueous solution Waste Category: 0 TSD County: NRV000001925 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065612 Mailing City,St,Zip: 1381 S AUTO CENTER DR Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: VICTOR HARDIN Contact: CAD983600602 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 1.4595 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: HARDIN HONDA (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: (714) 776-3104 Contact telephone: US Contact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1281 S TALT ST Contact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 P O BOX 819 Mailing address: CAD981413263 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1281 S TALT ST Facility address: CARLSON DESIGN Facility name: 05/13/1986 Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1209 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster F 0.229 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 170 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNET ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SSW FINDS 1281 S TALT ST CAD981413263 F23 RCRA-SQG CARLSON DESIGN [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 45 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002698251 Registry ID: FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: CARLSON DESIGN Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Description: Small Small Quantity Generator Classification: CARLSON DESIGN (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 46 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Facility County: 0.22 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixture Waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928150000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 819 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: Telephone: INACTIVE PER VQ96 Contact: CAD981413263 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .2293 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.) Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD008302903 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928150000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 819 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: DAVE CARLSON PRESIDENT Contact: CAD981413263 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .2085 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.) Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD008302903 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928150000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 819 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: DAVE CARLSON PRESIDENT Contact: CAD981413263 Gepaid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and CARLSON DESIGN (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 47 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Orange Facility County: 0.0378 Tons: Not reported Disposal Method: Aqueous solution with less than 10% total organic residues Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAT080013352 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928055614 Mailing City,St,Zip: 955 S MELROSE ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: BILL BENCIVENGA Contact: CAL000330654 Gepaid: HAZNET: Stock Inventor Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: DIESEL Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00000550 Tank Capacity: Not reported Year Installed: 1 Container Num: 001 Tank Num: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Owner City,St,Zip: 200 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD, S Owner Address: CITY OF ANAHEIM-DEPARTMENT OF Owner Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: BOB Contact Name: 0001 Total Tanks: FIRE STATION Other Type: Other Facility Type: 00000056725 Facility ID: STATE Region: HIST UST: 1220 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E 0.231 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 172 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 West HAZNET 2222 E BALL RD N/A E24 HIST UST FIRE STATION #7 U001578751 Not reported Board Of Equalization: 9 Number: 8745 Comp Number: A Status: SWEEPS UST: -117.88418 Longitude: 33.8145 Latitude: 15022 Global ID: UST: 1290 ft. Site 5 of 6 in cluster F 0.244 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW SWEEPS UST 2301 E WINSTON RD N/A F25 UST CARLSON DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION U003938615 TC2911758.1s Page 48 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADED Content: W Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 6000 Capacity: Not reported Actv Date: 30-011-008745-000003 Tank Id: 790 Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 02-12-92 Act Date: 02-12-92 Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: 9 Number: 8745 Comp Number: A Status: Not reported Number Of Tanks: LEADED Content: W Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 6000 Capacity: Not reported Actv Date: 30-011-008745-000002 Tank Id: 790 Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 02-12-92 Act Date: 02-12-92 Ref Date: Not reported Board Of Equalization: 9 Number: 8745 Comp Number: A Status: 3 Number Of Tanks: LEADED Content: W Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 6000 Capacity: Not reported Actv Date: 30-011-008745-000001 Tank Id: 790 Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 12-31-88 Created Date: 02-12-92 Act Date: 02-12-92 Ref Date: CARLSON DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION (Continued) U003938615 Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported Regulated ID: UTNKA Regulated By: 30017758 Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1290 ft. Site 6 of 6 in cluster F 0.244 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW 2301 E WINSTON RD N/A F26 CA FID UST CARLSON DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION S101589629 TC2911758.1s Page 49 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Active Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM 92806 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: P O BOX Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: CARLSON DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION (Continued) S101589629 Not reported Abate Method: 0 Qty Leaked: Diesel Substance: Soil only Case Type: 89UT197 Local Case Num: 083000240T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Diesel Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Local Agency File Location: 89UT197 LOC Case Number: 083000240T RB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Local Agency: WJ Case Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Lead Agency: 1990-06-20 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.886534 Longitude: 33.815418 Latitude: T0605900185 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 083000240T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: 1410 ft. 0.267 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW LUST 2121 WINSTON N/A 27 HIST CORTESE MC KESSON DRUG S102433204 TC2911758.1s Page 50 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: MUN Beneficial: Not reported Hydr Basin 30000L Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: WJ Staff Initials: PAH Staff: * MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8146029 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 6/20/1990 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 11/1/1989 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Enter Date: 9/9/9999 How Stopped Date: T0605900185 Global ID: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Leak Cause: Close Tank How Stopped: Tank Closure How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Cross Street: MC KESSON DRUG (Continued) S102433204 Not reported Primary Waste Type: Not reported Primary Waste: Not reported Complexity: Not reported Edit Date: WMUDS/SWAT: 1416 ft. 0.268 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 170 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA East 14812 BALL ROAD N/A 28 WMUDS/SWAT MCCLELLAN & SONS I S103442611 TC2911758.1s Page 51 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Solid Waste Information ID: 8 300040NUR Waste Discharge System ID: Not reported Self-Monitoring Rept. Frequency: Not reported Waste Discharge Requirements: Not reported RCRA Facility: Not reported Section Range: 1 Number of WMUDS at Facility: MA Regional Board Project Officer: False Sub Chapter 15: Not reported Threat to Water Quality: Not reported Solid Waste Assessment Test Program: False Department of Defence: False Resource Conservation Recovery Act: False Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Program: True Solid Waste Assessment Test Program: False Waste Discharge System: Not reported Last Facility Editors: Not reported Comments: Not reported Secondary SIC: Not reported Primary SIC: Not reported SWAT Facility Name: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Facility Description: Not reported Facility Type: 8 Region: Not reported Land Owner Phone: Not reported Land Owner Contact: CA Land Owner City,St,Zip: Not reported Land Owner Address: Not reported Land Owner Name: Not reported Agency Telephone: Not reported Agency Contact: Not reported Agency City,St,Zip: Not reported Agency Address: Not reported Agency Department: Not reported Agency Name: Not reported Agency Type: False Waste List: False Open To Public: False Superorder: False Municipal Solid Waste: Not reported Regional Board ID: 0 Tonnage: Not reported NPID: Not reported Base Meridian: Not reported Secondary Waste Type: Not reported Secondary Waste: MCCLELLAN & SONS I (Continued) S103442611 TC2911758.1s Page 52 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Gasoline Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083002577T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: ROW Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 1998-01-27 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.813515 Latitude: T0605901807 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 1417 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster G 0.268 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 168 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SSW 1445 S SUNKIST ST N/A G29 LUST WEST COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY S109284595 Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 1/27/1998 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 10/13/1994 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: 10/28/1994 Review Date: 12/13/1994 Enter Date: Not reported How Stopped Date: T0605901807 Global ID: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Gasoline Substance: Soil only Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083002577T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: 1417 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster G 0.268 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 168 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SSW CA FID UST 1445 SUNKIST ST N/A G30 LUST WEST COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY S101589638 TC2911758.1s Page 53 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Active Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM 92806 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 1445 S SUNKIST Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: Not reported Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported Regulated ID: UTNKA Regulated By: 30017767 Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: ROW Staff Initials: CAB Staff: * MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Tested: 1 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.813515 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: 12/13/1994 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: WEST COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY (Continued) S101589638 TC2911758.1s Page 54 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083001676T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: CAB Case Worker: SANTA ANA (REGION 8) Lead Agency: 1992-09-16 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.885739 Longitude: 33.813758 Latitude: T0605901262 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 1491 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster H 0.282 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 168 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW 2210 E WINSTON RD N/A H31 LUST RUSSELL INVESTMENTS S109284469 12/15/1990 Enter Date: Not reported How Stopped Date: T0605901262 Global ID: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported How Discovered: Not reported Funding: CLOS Enf Type: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Perchlorethylene Substance: Soil only Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083001676T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: 083001676T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: 1491 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster H 0.282 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 168 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW LUST 2210 WINSTON RD N/A H32 HIST CORTESE RUSSELL INVESTMENTS S102436084 TC2911758.1s Page 55 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation NO FILE NO FILE NO FILE NO FILE Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Regional Board Lead Agency: ROW Staff Initials: CAB Staff: * MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8143999 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: 12/15/1990 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: 11/20/1990 Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 9/16/1992 Close Date: 1/1/1965 Enforcement Date: 8/16/1990 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: 8/16/1990 Review Date: RUSSELL INVESTMENTS (Continued) S102436084 Not reported Contact telephone: Not reported Contact country: Not reported Not reported Contact address: Not reported Contact: LONG BEACH, CA 90806 P O BOX 16118 Mailing address: CAD981382674 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1198 S STATE COLLEGE Facility address: EXXON S/S 7 0732 Facility name: 09/01/1996 Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1885 ft. HIST UST Site 1 of 5 in cluster I 0.357 mi. LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West FINDS 1198 S STATE COLLEGE CAD981382674 I33 RCRA-SQG EXXON S/S 7 0732 [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 56 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation FINDS: No violations found Violation Status: Large Quantity Generator Classification: EXXON S/S 7 0732 Facility name: 03/05/1986 Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Verified to be non-commercial Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: Unknown Furnace exemption: Unknown On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: Unknown Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Unknown U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: EXXON CO USA Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: (415) 555-1212 Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Description: Small Small Quantity Generator Classification: 09 EPA Region: Not reported Contact email: EXXON S/S 7 0732 (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 57 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation T0605900109 Global ID: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Leak Cause: Close Tank How Stopped: Tank Closure How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: 0 Qty Leaked: Gasoline Substance: Soil only Case Type: 86UT043 Local Case Num: 083000144T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Gasoline Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Local Agency File Location: 86UT043 LOC Case Number: 083000144T RB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Local Agency: WJ Case Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Lead Agency: 1986-10-03 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8182018 Latitude: T0605900109 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 083000144T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002688075 Registry ID: EXXON S/S 7 0732 (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 58 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation UNLEADED Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00006000 Tank Capacity: 1962 Year Installed: 1 Container Num: 001 Tank Num: HOUSTON, TX 77210 Owner City,St,Zip: 16945 NORTH CHASE BLVD. Owner Address: EXXON COMPANY U.S.A. Owner Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: BERJ PAPADOPOULAS Contact Name: 0004 Total Tanks: Not reported Other Type: Gas Station Facility Type: 00000023958 Facility ID: STATE Region: HIST UST: Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: MUN Beneficial: Not reported Hydr Basin 30000L Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: WJ Staff Initials: CAB Staff: * MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Tested: 1 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8182018 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 10/3/1986 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 1/1/1965 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Enter Date: 9/9/9999 How Stopped Date: EXXON S/S 7 0732 (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 59 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Stock Inventor Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: WASTE OIL Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00001000 Tank Capacity: Not reported Year Installed: 4 Container Num: 004 Tank Num: Stock Inventor Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: REGULAR Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00010000 Tank Capacity: 1962 Year Installed: 3 Container Num: 003 Tank Num: Stock Inventor Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: PREMIUM Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00008000 Tank Capacity: 1969 Year Installed: 2 Container Num: 002 Tank Num: Stock Inventor Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: EXXON S/S 7 0732 (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Diesel Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083003463T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: ROW Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 2000-02-23 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8198222 Latitude: T0605902284 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 1891 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster I 0.358 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 West 1200 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A I34 LUST SHELL #1200 S109284684 TC2911758.1s Page 60 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Benzene Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083002733T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: ROW Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 1997-08-01 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.819613 Latitude: T0605901886 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 1894 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster I 0.359 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West 1199 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A I35 LUST MOBIL #18-K3Q S109284588 Not reported Local Case Num: 083002733T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Not reported Potential Contaminants of Concern: Under Investigation Potential Media Affect: Local Agency File Location: 85UT002 LOC Case Number: Not reported RB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Local Agency: WJ Case Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Lead Agency: 1985-06-25 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.889332 Longitude: 33.851148 Latitude: T0605993216 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 1897 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster I 0.359 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West 1199 STATE COLLEGE N/A I36 LUST MOBIL OIL S103943480 TC2911758.1s Page 61 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: INSTALLED. 2/5/85: EXCAVATION ACTIVITES REPORT, 8/1/95 BORINGS AND VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLS Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: ROW Staff Initials: RS Staff: * MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: .12 Max MTBE Soil: 1 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8181998 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: 12/14/1995 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: 9/7/1995 Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 8/1/1997 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 7/25/1995 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: 9/28/1995 Review Date: 12/14/1995 Enter Date: Not reported How Stopped Date: T0605901886 Global ID: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: OM How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: BALL Cross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose in Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Benzene Substance: Soil only Case Type: MOBIL OIL (Continued) S103943480 TC2911758.1s Page 62 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: MUN Beneficial: Not reported Hydr Basin 30000L Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: WJ Staff Initials: RS Staff: * MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: Not reported Longitude: Not reported Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 6/25/1985 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: Not reported Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported How Stopped Date: T0605993216 Global ID: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Not reported Substance: Undefined Case Type: 85UT002 Local Case Num: Not reported Case Number: MOBIL OIL (Continued) S103943480 TC2911758.1s Page 63 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Gasoline Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083001884T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: ROW Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 1994-12-29 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8195423 Latitude: T0605901405 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 1898 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster I 0.359 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 169 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West 1201 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A I37 LUST UNOCAL #6220 S109284572 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Gasoline Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083000078T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: UNK Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 1986-08-07 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.888018 Longitude: 33.815222 Latitude: T0605900062 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 2069 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster J 0.392 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 167 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW 1323 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A J38 LUST CAC INDUSTRIAL S109284292 TC2911758.1s Page 64 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 6/19/1998 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 7/14/1993 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Review Date: Not reported Enter Date: 9/9/9999 How Stopped Date: T0605900834 Global ID: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Leak Cause: Close Tank How Stopped: Tank Closure How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: 0 Qty Leaked: 12034,800661 Substance: Soil only Case Type: 93UT058 Local Case Num: 083001056T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Diesel, Gasoline Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Local Agency File Location: 93UT058 LOC Case Number: 083001056T RB Case Number: Not reported Local Agency: AD Case Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Lead Agency: 1998-06-19 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8060702 Latitude: T0605900834 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 083001056T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: 2159 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster K 0.409 mi. EMI Relative: Lower Actual: 171 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID UST ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SSE LUST 10852 DOUGLASS N/A K39 HIST CORTESE KATELLA YARD U002096316 TC2911758.1s Page 65 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 4536 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1987 Year: EMI: Active Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ANAHEIM 92806 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 1143 E FRUIT ST ATN: DEAN H Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported Regulated ID: UTNKA Regulated By: 30000856 Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: MUN Beneficial: Not reported Hydr Basin 30000L Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: AD Staff Initials: NOM Staff: * MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8060702 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: KATELLA YARD (Continued) U002096316 TC2911758.1s Page 66 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 17 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 53 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: 9621 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: 4536 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1995 Year: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 30 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 85 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: 9621 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: 4536 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1990 Year: 1 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 1 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 7 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 8 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: 4463 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: KATELLA YARD (Continued) U002096316 083001452T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: 2170 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster J 0.411 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 166 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW LUST 1350 STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A J40 HIST CORTESE PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC S104752781 TC2911758.1s Page 67 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Regional Board Lead Agency: RM Staff Initials: CAB Staff: * MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8144349 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: 3/19/1990 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: 7/12/1992 Remed Action: 3/19/1991 Remed Plan: 11/7/2002 Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Close Date: 9/18/2001 Enforcement Date: 3/1/1990 Discover Date: 1/1/1990 Prelim Assess: Not reported Review Date: 3/19/1990 Enter Date: Not reported How Stopped Date: T0605901102 Global ID: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported How Discovered: Not reported Funding: SI Enf Type: WINSTON Cross Street: contaminants Pump and Treat Ground Water - generally employed to remove dissolved Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: TCE Substance: Aquifer affected Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083001452T Case Number: Pollution Characterization Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC (Continued) S104752781 TC2911758.1s Page 68 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation -APROV’D CAP FOR ENHANCED GW REMED 8/5/96-DISCUSSED OFFSITE WP W/ DAMES & MOORE IS CLEAN. AQUIFER IS TO BE DEWATERED. EXPANDED VADOSE ZONE TREATED W/ VE 6/5/9 4/8/91- PLUME IN SHALLOW AQUIFER STILL UNDEFINED. SAMPLE FROM TALBERT AQUIFER Summary: PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC (Continued) S104752781 RO0002382 Record ID: Soil Only Case Type: 06/19/1998 Date Closed: Gasoline-Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Released Substance: Certification (Case Closed) Current Status: 93UT058 Facility Id: ORANGE Region: RO0002382 Record ID: Soil Only Case Type: 06/19/1998 Date Closed: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D, 2-4 Released Substance: Certification (Case Closed) Current Status: 93UT058 Facility Id: ORANGE Region: ORANGE CO. LUST: 2177 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster K 0.412 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 170 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SSE 10852 DOUGLASS RD N/A K41 LUST KATELLA YARD S102432119 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Trichloroethylene (TCE) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supply Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083001452T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: CAB Case Worker: SANTA ANA (REGION 8) Lead Agency: 2005-10-15 00:00:00 Status Date: Open - Remediation Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8144349 Latitude: T0605901102 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 2304 ft. 0.436 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 165 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW 1350 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A 42 LUST PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC S109284177 TC2911758.1s Page 69 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Diesel Potential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supply Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083001214T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: RM Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 2007-12-07 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -117.891352 Longitude: 33.818653 Latitude: T0605900950 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 2424 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster L 0.459 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 166 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 West 1801 E BALL RD N/A L43 LUST ROLLINS TRUCK LEASING S109284558 Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Close Date: 1/1/1965 Enforcement Date: 1/26/1989 Discover Date: 7/25/1989 Prelim Assess: 10/12/1993 Review Date: 9/5/1989 Enter Date: 1/26/1989 How Stopped Date: T0605900950 Global ID: Piping Leak Source: Other Cause Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Tank Test How Discovered: Not reported Funding: None Taken Enf Type: TRIDENT Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Diesel Substance: Aquifer affected Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083001214T Case Number: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: 2424 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster L 0.459 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 166 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 West 1801 BALL RD N/A L44 LUST ROLLINS TRUCK LEASING S106784795 TC2911758.1s Page 70 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation DATED 04-28-89. THIS SITE IS ADJACENT TO SEARGENT-WELCH. INTEGRITY TEST OF TANKS/PIPELINES. 04-08-91: LAST ENTRY IN FILE IS FAILURE TO MONITOR TANKS, NO DAILY RECORD, FAILURE TO ANNUALLY PERFORM TANK Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: RM Staff Initials: CAB Staff: C MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 1 MTBE Concentration: 20 Max MTBE GW: 6/22/2001 MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.8182398 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Yes Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: < GW Qualifies: 9/5/1989 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: 10/20/2000 Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: ROLLINS TRUCK LEASING (Continued) S106784795 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: Not reported Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affected: Regional Board File Location: PCA#20852 RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: MGC Case Worker: Cleanup Program Site Case Type: -117.885118 Longitude: 33.811701 Latitude: Not reported Lead Agency Case Number: SANTA ANA (REGION 8) Lead Agency: SL0605956547 Global Id: 2007-02-22 00:00:00 Status Date: Open - Site Assessment Facility Status: STATE Region: SLIC: 2582 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster M 0.489 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW 2201 CERRITOS AVENUE E N/A M45 SLIC NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY S106487163 TC2911758.1s Page 71 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Amount: Anaheim Fire Department Admin Agency: 9/16/200012:00:00 AM Incident Date: Neville Chem. Comp. Agency: 2000 Year: Not reported Date/Time: Not reported Other: Not reported Measure: Not reported Type: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Containment: Reporting Party Cleanup By: Not reported Spill Site: Not reported Waterway: No Waterway Involved: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Comments: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Company Name: Not reported CA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Special Studies 6: Not reported Special Studies 5: Not reported Special Studies 4: Not reported Special Studies 3: Not reported Special Studies 2: Not reported Special Studies 1: Not reported Property Management: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Incident Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported OES Date: 9/17/200012:53:41 AM OES notification: 00-4193 OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: 2600 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster M 0.492 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW ENVIROSTOR 2201 EAST CERRITOS AVE N/A M46 CHMIRS S101126234 TC2911758.1s Page 72 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported CA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Special Studies 6: Not reported Special Studies 5: Not reported Special Studies 4: Not reported Special Studies 3: Not reported Special Studies 2: Not reported Special Studies 1: Not reported Property Management: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Incident Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported OES Date: 6/17/199908:40:42 AM OES notification: 99-2565 OES Incident Number: within secondary containment. substance was introduces causing boiling and overflow. All caught A tank overflow caused by water being in the tank when the hot Description: 0 Number of Fatalities: 0 Number of Injuries: 0 Evacuations: 0 Unknown: 0 Tons: 0 Sheen: 0 Quarts: 0 Pints: 0 Ounces: 0 Liters: 0 Pounds: 0 Grams: 200 Gallons: 0 CUFT: 0 Cups: 0 BBLS: Not reported Quantity Released: resin and oil solution Substance: Not reported E Date: Industrial Plant Site Type: Yes Contained: (Continued) S101126234 TC2911758.1s Page 73 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Incident Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported OES Date: 3/1/199911:14:57 AM OES notification: 99-0962 OES Incident Number: investigation Overflow of non hazardous substance. The incident is under Description: 0 Number of Fatalities: 0 Number of Injuries: 0 Evacuations: 0 Unknown: 0 Tons: 0 Sheen: 0 Quarts: 0 Pints: 0 Ounces: 0 Liters: 0 Pounds: 0 Grams: 100 Gallons: 0 CUFT: 0 Cups: 0 BBLS: Not reported Quantity Released: Resin Solution Substance: Not reported E Date: Industrial Plant Site Type: Yes Contained: Not reported Amount: Anaheim Fire Department Admin Agency: 6/17/199912:00:00 AM Incident Date: Neville Chemical Co Agency: 1999 Year: Not reported Date/Time: Not reported Other: Not reported Measure: Not reported Type: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Containment: Reporting Party Cleanup By: Not reported Spill Site: Not reported Waterway: No Waterway Involved: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Comments: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Company Name: (Continued) S101126234 TC2911758.1s Page 74 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 0 Unknown: 0 Tons: 0 Sheen: 0 Quarts: 0 Pints: 0 Ounces: 0 Liters: 0 Pounds: 0 Grams: 375 Gallons: 0 CUFT: 0 Cups: 0 BBLS: Not reported Quantity Released: Hydro Carbon Distillate Substance: Not reported E Date: Industrial Plant Site Type: Yes Contained: Not reported Amount: Anaheim Fire Department Admin Agency: 2/27/199912:00:00 AM Incident Date: Nebille Chemical Co Agency: 1999 Year: Not reported Date/Time: Not reported Other: Not reported Measure: Not reported Type: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Containment: Reporting Party Cleanup By: Not reported Spill Site: Not reported Waterway: No Waterway Involved: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Comments: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Company Name: Not reported CA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Special Studies 6: Not reported Special Studies 5: Not reported Special Studies 4: Not reported Special Studies 3: Not reported Special Studies 2: Not reported Special Studies 1: Not reported Property Management: (Continued) S101126234 TC2911758.1s Page 75 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported PRELIM ASSESS DONE PENDING STATUS BASED ON OUTCOME OF SITE INSPECTION. Comments: 1988-06-27 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: ISSUES, THEREFORE, DHS STATUS IS PENDING. SITE INSP DONE SANTA ANA IS CURRENTLY ADDRESSING CONTAMINATION Comments: 1989-05-10 00:00:00 Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30280120 Alias Name: GeoTracker Global ID Alias Type: SL0605956547 Alias Name: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAD008364150 Alias Name: APN Alias Type: 083-210-31 Alias Name: NMA Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: 20012, 20028 10002, 10003, 10009, 10061, 10063, 10064, 10097, 10119, 10185, 10196, Potential COC: MANUFACTURING - CHEMICALS Past Use: 083-210-31 APN: -117.885575294495 Longitude: 33.811842175623099 Latitude: Not reported Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: 7/1/2008 Status Date: Active Status: EPA - PASI Special Program: 33 Senate: 69 Assembly: Not reported Site Code: 30280120 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: Emad Yemut Supervisor: EILEEN KHACHATOURIANS Program Manager: 8 - Santa Ana Lead Agency: 8 - Santa Ana Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: 18.600000000000001 Acres: Evaluation Site Type Detailed: Evaluation Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: Tank oveerflowed Description: 0 Number of Fatalities: 0 Number of Injuries: 0 Evacuations: (Continued) S101126234 TC2911758.1s Page 76 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: Reassessment completed by DTSC and approved by EPA Comments: 2009-02-09 00:00:00 Completed Date: PA/SI Reassessment Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Site Screening Completed Comments: 2006-04-12 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED Comments: 1987-05-29 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: (Continued) S101126234 NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.88601199999999 Longitude: 33.812018000000002 Latitude: Not reported Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: Not reported Status Date: Not reported Status: Not reported Special Program: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: Not reported Site Code: 71002209 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: Not reported Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: Not reported Acres: Tiered Permit Site Type Detailed: Not reported Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: 2600 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster M 0.492 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW 2201 E. CERRITOS AVENUE N/A M47 ENVIROSTOR NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO. S110494097 TC2911758.1s Page 77 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Comments: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Area Name: Completed Info: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAD008364150 Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO. (Continued) S110494097 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported Site History: * Solvents Potential Contaminants of Concern: Soil Potential Media Affect: Not reported File Location: Not reported LOC Case Number: 083000667T RB Case Number: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Local Agency: UNK Case Worker: ANAHEIM, CITY OF Lead Agency: 1987-11-29 00:00:00 Status Date: Completed - Case Closed Status: LUST Cleanup Site Case Type: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.810717 Latitude: T0605900528 Global Id: STATE Region: LUST: 2600 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster M 0.492 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW 2201 E CERRITOS AVE N/A M48 LUST NEVILLE CHEMICAL S109284216 TC2911758.1s Page 78 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.810717 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: 10/15/1987 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Remed Plan: 10/15/1987 Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: 11/29/1987 Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: Not reported Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Review Date: 10/15/1987 Enter Date: Not reported How Stopped Date: T0605900528 Global ID: Not reported Leak Source: Not reported Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Solvents Substance: Soil only Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083000667T Case Number: Case Closed Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: LUST REG 8: 8 302606N01 Reg Id: WBC&D Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: 083000667T Reg Id: LTNKA Reg By: 30 Facility County Code: CORTESE Region: CORTESE: 2600 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster M 0.492 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW LUST 2201 CERRITOS AVE N/A M49 HIST CORTESE NEVILLE CHEMICAL S101541105 TC2911758.1s Page 79 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Date: -117.885261 Longitude: 33.810737 Latitude: LUST Oversite Program: Not reported Interim: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Operator: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported GW Qualifies: 11/3/1999 Enter Date: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Remed Action: 11/3/1998 Remed Plan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Enforcement Date: 8/25/1998 Discover Date: Not reported Prelim Assess: 11/3/1998 Review Date: 11/3/1999 Enter Date: 9/22/1998 How Stopped Date: T0605902328 Global ID: Piping Leak Source: UNK Leak Cause: Not reported How Stopped: Tank Closure How Discovered: Not reported Funding: Not reported Enf Type: STATE COLLEGE Cross Street: Not reported Abate Method: Not reported Qty Leaked: Hydrocarbons Substance: Aquifer affected Case Type: Not reported Local Case Num: 083003566T Case Number: Remediation Plan Facility Status: Santa Ana Region Regional Board: Orange County: 8 Region: Not reported Summary: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Local Agency Lead Agency: UNK Staff Initials: PAH Staff: * MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued) S101541105 TC2911758.1s Page 80 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Summary: No Work Suspended: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Priority: Not reported Beneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Hydr Basin 30011 Local Agency: Regional Board Lead Agency: UNK Staff Initials: MGC Staff: * MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Tested: 0 MTBE Fuel: Not reported Max MTBE Soil: 0 MTBE Concentration: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued) S101541105 Not reported Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Action: Not reported Priority Level: 11/01/87 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: DISCOVERY Action: CERCLIS Assessment History: THEREFORE, DHS STATUS IS PENDING. SITE INSP DONE SANTA ANA IS CURRENTLY ADDRESSING CONTAMINATION ISSUES, BASED ON OUTCOME OF SITE INSPECTION. SI SITE INSPECTION REPORT 5/10/1989 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT REPORT 6/27/1988 PRELIM ASSESS DONE PENDING STATUS SITE SCREENING 5/29/1987 SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED PA 2005. 10/07: Envirostor TYPE TITLE COMPLETION DATE COMPLETION COMMENT lead oversight for the site and a phase II is planned. the facility closed in The California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Santa Ana Region) has the Site Description: Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Contact Title: (415) 972-3814 Contact Tel: Carl Brickner Contact Name: Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Contact Title: (415) 972-3095 Contact Tel: Jeff Inglis Contact Name: Site Assessment Manager (SAM) Contact Title: (415) 972-3219 Contact Tel: Karen Jurist Contact Name: CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s): Other Cleanup Activity: State-Lead Cleanup Non NPL Status: Not on the NPL NPL Status: Not a Federal Facility Federal Facility: 0901083 Site ID: CERCLIS: 2600 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster M 0.492 mi. HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/4-1/2 FINDS ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW RCRA-LQG 2201 E. CERRITOS AVE. CAD008364150 M50 CERCLIS NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 81 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during any Description: Large Quantity Generator Classification: Private Land type: 09 EPA Region: [EMAIL REDACTED] Contact email: (412) 777-4253 Contact telephone: Not reported Contact country: Not reported Not reported Contact address: JOHN H FERGUSON Contact: PITTSBURGH, PA 15225 2800 NEVILLE RD Mailing address: CAD008364150 EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 90670 2201 E. CERRITOS AVENUE Facility address: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 03/01/2006 Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: Not reported Priority Level: 02/09/09 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: SITE REASSESSMENT Action: Low priority for further assessment Priority Level: 04/12/06 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: SITE REASSESSMENT Action: Low priority for further assessment Priority Level: 02/12/03 Date Completed: 09/26/01 Date Started: SITE REASSESSMENT Action: Low priority for further assessment Priority Level: 09/19/89 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: SITE INSPECTION Action: Low priority for further assessment Priority Level: 03/15/89 Date Completed: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 82 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 03/28/1994 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 02/13/1996 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEM CO Site name: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 09/01/1996 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 03/04/1999 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 03/01/2006 Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Commercial status unknown Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: 01/01/1958 Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: US Owner/operator country: PITTSBURGH, PA 15225 2800 NEVILLE RD Owner/operator address: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: 01/01/1958 Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: US Owner/operator country: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator address: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 83 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information Environmental Interest/Information System 110000480998 Registry ID: FINDS: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation lead agency: 08/09/1994 Date achieved compliance: Generators - General Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 01/05/1993 Evaluation date: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 08/09/1994 Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 08/09/1994 Date achieved compliance: 01/05/1993 Date violation determined: Generators - General Area of violation: FR - 262.10-12.A Regulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEM CO Site name: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 08/18/1980 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY# Site name: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 04/19/1990 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY# Site name: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: 02/27/1992 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO Site name: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Facility name: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 84 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Contact: CAD008364150 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 36.2750 Tons: Transfer Station Disposal Method: Polymeric resin waste Waste Category: San Bernardino TSD County: CAD982444481 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065710 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 E CERRITOS ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Contact: CAD008364150 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 6.2550 Tons: Treatment, Tank Disposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oil Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD028409019 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065710 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 E CERRITOS ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Contact: CAD008364150 Gepaid: HAZNET: and financial information. including an inventory of sites, planned and actual site activities, system contains information on all aspects of hazardous waste sites, to support management in all phases of the Superfund program. The Liability Information System) is the Superfund database that is used CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 85 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 71 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Orange Facility County: 4.4000 Tons: Not reported Disposal Method: Polymeric resin waste Waste Category: San Bernardino TSD County: CAD982444481 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065710 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 E CERRITOS ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Contact: CAD008364150 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 1.4595 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixture Waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD008302903 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065710 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 E CERRITOS ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Contact: CAD008364150 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .8428 Tons: Not reported Disposal Method: Asbestos-containing waste Waste Category: 99 TSD County: AZC950823111 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928065710 Mailing City,St,Zip: 2201 E CERRITOS ST Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] MGC Substance: MGC Staff: 8 Region: 6 Facility Status: Soil and Groundwater Type: SLIC: 2600 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster M 0.492 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SW HIST UST 2201 E CERRITOS AVE N/A M51 SLIC NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO. [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 86 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00000000 Tank Capacity: 1980 Year Installed: NAUC 5 Container Num: 005 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: 8 inches Tank Construction: Not reported Type of Fuel: WASTE Tank Used for: 33000000 Tank Capacity: 1971 Year Installed: NAUC 4 Container Num: 004 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: 0000025 inches Tank Construction: Not reported Type of Fuel: WASTE Tank Used for: 00000240 Tank Capacity: Not reported Year Installed: NAUC 3 Container Num: 003 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: 5 inches Tank Construction: Not reported Type of Fuel: WASTE Tank Used for: 00000000 Tank Capacity: 1958 Year Installed: NAUC 2 Container Num: 002 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: Not reported Tank Construction: Not reported Type of Fuel: WASTE Tank Used for: 00010000 Tank Capacity: 1958 Year Installed: NAUC 1 Container Num: 001 Tank Num: PITTSBURG, PA 15225 Owner City,St,Zip: NEVILLE ISLAND Owner Address: NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY Owner Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: THOMAS A PRADETTO Contact Name: 0007 Total Tanks: MANUFACTURER Other Type: Other Facility Type: 00000003365 Facility ID: STATE Region: HIST UST: MGC Thomas Bros Code: MGC Location Code: MGC Lead Agency: NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO. (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 87 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Visual Leak Detection: .375 inches Tank Construction: Not reported Type of Fuel: WASTE Tank Used for: 00000458 Tank Capacity: 1980 Year Installed: NAUC 7 Container Num: 007 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: 5.5 inches Tank Construction: Not reported Type of Fuel: WASTE Tank Used for: 00000000 Tank Capacity: 1958 Year Installed: NAUC 6 Container Num: 006 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: 0.5 inches Tank Construction: Not reported Type of Fuel: NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO. (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] 30315-NO,30367-NO,30400-NO,30001-NO,30003-NO,30004-NO,30006-NO, 30575-NO,30023-NO,30043-NO,30181-NO,30207-NO,30308-NO,30311-NO, Confirmed COC: 30043, 30181, 30207, 30308, 30311, 30315, 30367, 30400, 30575 , 30001, 30003, 30004, 30006, 30007, 30008, 30013, 30014, 30023, Potential COC: AGRICULTURAL - ROW CROPS, RESIDENTIAL AREA, SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.88598641031599 Longitude: 33.823515706443999 Latitude: School District Funding: NO Restricted Use: 9/4/2003 Status Date: No Further Action Status: Not reported Special Program Status: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: 404431 Site Code: Cypress Division Branch: * Triss Chesney Supervisor: Not reported Project Manager: DTSC - Site Mitigation And Brownfield Reuse Program Lead Agency Description: Lead Agency: Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NO National Priorities List: 1 Acres: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: School Site Type Detail: School Investigation Site Type: 30820018 Facility ID: SCH: 2651 ft. 0.502 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. 1/2-1 ENVIROSTOR ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NW HAZNET 2200 EAST WAGNER AVENUE N/A 52 SCH ANAHEIM UHSD/KATELLA S103950116 TC2911758.1s Page 88 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation HAZNET: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: for the Katella High School. DTSC will provide oversight for a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment As part of the Master Oversight Agreement between DTSC and the AUHSD, Comments: 2003-02-10 00:00:00 Completed Date: Environmental Oversight Agreement Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Not reported Comments: 2003-09-16 00:00:00 Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Not reported Comments: 2003-04-16 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Workplan Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: site, and approved the PEA. further environmental investigation or cleanup was required at this environment under any land use. Therefore, DTSC concurred that no indicated at the site pose a threat to human health or the material, nor the presence of naturally occurring hazardous material determined neither an actual or a potential release of hazardous DTSC approved the Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) and Comments: 2003-09-04 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30820018 Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Type: 404431 Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: KATELLA HIGH SCHOOL Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HSD-KATELLA HS Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Alias Name: NMA Potential Description: 30007-NO,30008-NO,30013-NO,30014-NO,31000-NO ANAHEIM UHSD/KATELLA (Continued) S103950116 TC2911758.1s Page 89 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Disposal, Land Fill Disposal Method: Asbestos-containing waste Waste Category: Los Angeles TSD County: CAD009007626 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928030000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3520 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: ANAHEIM UNION HS DIST Contact: CAL000048741 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .1042 Tons: Not reported Disposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixture Waste Category: Orange TSD County: CAT000613976 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928030000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3520 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: ANAHEIM UNION HS DIST Contact: CAL000048741 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .2502 Tons: Recycler Disposal Method: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Waste Category: Orange TSD County: CAD982524613 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928030000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3520 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: ANAHEIM UNION HS DIST Contact: CAL000048741 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: .1251 Tons: Not reported Disposal Method: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Waste Category: Orange TSD County: CAD982524613 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928030000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3520 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: ANAHEIM UNION HS DIST Contact: CAL000048741 Gepaid: ANAHEIM UHSD/KATELLA (Continued) S103950116 TC2911758.1s Page 90 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Alternate Name Alias Type: KATELLA HIGH SCHOOL Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HSD-KATELLA HS Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Alias Name: NMA Potential Description: 30007-NO,30008-NO,30013-NO,30014-NO,31000-NO 30315-NO,30367-NO,30400-NO,30001-NO,30003-NO,30004-NO,30006-NO, 30575-NO,30023-NO,30043-NO,30181-NO,30207-NO,30308-NO,30311-NO, Confirmed COC: 30043, 30181, 30207, 30308, 30311, 30315, 30367, 30400, 30575 , 30001, 30003, 30004, 30006, 30007, 30008, 30013, 30014, 30023, Potential COC: AGRICULTURAL - ROW CROPS, RESIDENTIAL AREA, SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.88598641031599 Longitude: 33.823515706443999 Latitude: School District Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: 9/4/2003 Status Date: No Further Action Status: Not reported Special Program: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: 404431 Site Code: 30820018 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: * Triss Chesney Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: Lead Agency: Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: 1 Acres: School Site Type Detailed: School Investigation Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: 27 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Orange Facility County: 1.5075 Tons: Transfer Station Disposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixture Waste Category: San Bernardino TSD County: CAT080022148 TSD EPA ID: Orange Gen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928030000 Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3520 Mailing Address: Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported Facility Addr2: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: ANAHEIM UNION HS DIST Contact: CAL000048741 Gepaid: Orange Facility County: 42.9828 Tons: ANAHEIM UHSD/KATELLA (Continued) S103950116 TC2911758.1s Page 91 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: for the Katella High School. DTSC will provide oversight for a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment As part of the Master Oversight Agreement between DTSC and the AUHSD, Comments: 2003-02-10 00:00:00 Completed Date: Environmental Oversight Agreement Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Not reported Comments: 2003-09-16 00:00:00 Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Not reported Comments: 2003-04-16 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Workplan Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: site, and approved the PEA. further environmental investigation or cleanup was required at this environment under any land use. Therefore, DTSC concurred that no indicated at the site pose a threat to human health or the material, nor the presence of naturally occurring hazardous material determined neither an actual or a potential release of hazardous DTSC approved the Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) and Comments: 2003-09-04 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30820018 Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Type: 404431 Alias Name: ANAHEIM UHSD/KATELLA (Continued) S103950116 Not reported Acres: Tiered Permit Site Type Detailed: Not reported Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: 3008 ft. 0.570 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 163 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SW 1901 E. CERRITOS AVENUE N/A 53 ENVIROSTOR SUPERIOR PLATING, INC. S110494356 TC2911758.1s Page 92 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Comments: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Area Name: Completed Info: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAD982459471 Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -[PHONE REDACTED] Longitude: 33.810628199999996 Latitude: Not reported Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: Not reported Status Date: Not reported Status: Not reported Special Program: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: Not reported Site Code: 71003048 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: Not reported Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: SUPERIOR PLATING, INC. (Continued) S110494356 Referred - Not Assigned Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: Not reported Acres: * Historical Site Type Detailed: Historical Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: 3759 ft. 0.712 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 158 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92804 SSW 2211 EAST HOWELL STREET N/A 54 ENVIROSTOR ITASCO S101541102 TC2911758.1s Page 93 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 1983-11-08 00:00:00 Completed Date: Removal Action Completion Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Site Screening Done: CERCLA grant Preliminary Assessment required. Comments: 1987-05-06 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Soil sample levels (11/04/83) below TTLC and TLC. excavated to depth of eight feet; 409 tons of soil removed to BKK. BKK (04/15/83). Samples (05/11/83) show solvent contamination. Site Preliminary Assessment Done: Twenty yards, three of waste, removed to Comments: 1988-01-08 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: unlined sump. 1200ppm of TCE would remain within 8 feet of the surface in an backfilled with clean soil. It is not reasonable to believe that depth. No sampling was done below the 8 feet that was excavated and either surface samples or samp- les collected at a maximum if 8 ft. work at the site: Soil samples collected during cleanup in 1983 were recommends hazard ranking. Reasons for recommend- ation of further Site Inspection Done: EPA recommends Listing Site Inspec- tion; DHS Comments: 1989-09-26 00:00:00 Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30280129 Alias Name: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAD982359879 Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: MICHAEL-RAND PLATING Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: 10064, 10067, 10119, 30018 Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.885710257684 Longitude: 33.807356363992099 Latitude: Not reported Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: 12/16/1993 Status Date: Refer: Status: * CERC2 Special Program: 33 Senate: 69 Assembly: Not reported Site Code: 30280129 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: ITASCO (Continued) S101541102 TC2911758.1s Page 94 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: firm acid rinse goes into manhole. Facility identified via tip from Orange County Sanitary District - Comments: 1981-05-28 00:00:00 Completed Date: * Discovery Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: of contaminated soil was removed. RA Soil. Site has been hazard mitigated. Clean-up complete. 294 tons Comments: ITASCO (Continued) S101541102 Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Special Studies 6: Not reported Special Studies 5: Not reported Special Studies 4: Not reported Special Studies 3: Not reported Special Studies 2: Not reported Special Studies 1: Not reported Property Management: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Incident Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported OES Date: 11/27/200504:26:45 AM OES notification: 05-6830 OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: 4520 ft. 0.856 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 173 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92867 SE ENVIROSTOR 1350 N. MAIN STREET N/A 55 CHMIRS S108406261 TC2911758.1s Page 95 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Site Code: 71003507 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: Not reported Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: Not reported Acres: Tiered Permit Site Type Detailed: Not reported Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: additive to be released. Caller advised that the pump seal for the additive failed causing the Description: 0 Number of Fatalities: 0 Number of Injuries: 0 Evacuations: 0 Unknown: 0 Tons: 0 Sheen: 0 Quarts: 0 Pints: 0 Ounces: 0 Liters: 0 Pounds: 0 Grams: 0.000000 Gallons: 0 CUFT: 0 Cups: 0 BBLS: Not reported Quantity Released: Gasoline additive Substance: Not reported E Date: Refinery Site Type: Yes Contained: Not reported Amount: City of Orange Fire Prevention Bureau Admin Agency: 11/27/200512:00:00 AM Incident Date: Kinder Morgan Agency: 2005 Year: Not reported Date/Time: Not reported Other: Not reported Measure: Not reported Type: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Containment: Reporting Party Cleanup By: Not reported Spill Site: Not reported Waterway: Not reported Waterway Involved: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Comments: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Company Name: Not reported CA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number: (Continued) S108406261 TC2911758.1s Page 96 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Comments: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Area Name: Completed Info: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAT000625111 Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.86984099999999 Longitude: 33.810868900000003 Latitude: Not reported Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: Not reported Status Date: Not reported Status: Not reported Special Program: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: (Continued) S108406261 24 SIC Code: Not Listed NPL: RESPONSIBLE PARTY Type Name: RP Facility Type: N/A Lead Agency: Not reported Lead Agency: CERTIFIED Status Name: OVERSIGHT CERT - CERTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN REMEDIED SATISFACTORILY UNDER DTSC Status: 11191987 State Senate District: Not reported File Name: SO CAL - CYPRESS Branch Name: SB Branch: CYPRESS Region Name: 4 Region: 30240011 Facility ID: HISTORICAL CAL-SITES: 5077 ft. 0.962 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 185 ft. 1/2-1 ENVIROSTOR ORANGE, CA 92666 East RESPONSE 1841 N. BATAVIA STREET N/A 56 HIST Cal-Sites CONTINENTAL MOLDING S105749951 TC2911758.1s Page 97 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation tank bottoms removed. Comments: 10221986 Comments Date: Removal of 105 cubic yards of contaminated soil. Drums and Comments: 10221986 Comments Date: Section 25356. Comments: 05011986 Comments Date: This is the date the site was first listed AWP pursuant to Comments: 05011986 Comments Date: Site is certified as of 11/19/87. Comments: 04281989 Comments Date: Not reported Background Info: ORANGE, CA 92666 Alternate City,St,Zip: 1841 N. BATAVIA STREET Alternate Address: ORANGE, CA 92666 Alternate City,St,Zip: 1841 BATAVIA STREET Alternate Address: ORANGE, CA 92665 Alternate City,St,Zip: CORNER OF BATAVIA STREET AND TAFT AVENUE Alternate Address: 0 Unknown Type: 0 For Residential Reuse: 0 For Industrial Reuse: 0 For Commercial Reuse: Not reported Activity Comments: Not reported Removal Action Certification: Not reported Action Included Fencing: Not reported Well Decommissioned: Not reported Action Included Capping: 0 Liquids Treated (Gals): 0 Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Definition of Status: COM Activity Status: Not reported Request to Delete Activity: Not reported Estimated Size: 0 Est Person-Yrs to complete: 11191987 Comments Date: Not reported Revised Due Date: Not reported AWP Completion Date: 0 Proposed Budget: Not reported AWP Code: CERTIFICATION Activity Name: CERT Activity: 30240011 Facility ID: 33 State Senate District Code: 72 State Assembly District Code: DATA PROVIDED BY PM 1/03 Lat/Long Description: Not reported Lat/long Method: 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 Lat/Long (dms): Not reported Lat/Long Direction: Not reported Region Water Control Board Name: Not reported Region Water Control Board: Not reported Supervisor Responsible for Site: Not reported Staff Member Responsible for Site: Not reported Groundwater Contamination: Not reported Date Site Hazard Ranked: Not reported Hazardous Ranking Score: Not reported Cortese: Not reported Access: MANU - LUMBER & WOOD PRODUCTS SIC Name: CONTINENTAL MOLDING (Continued) S105749951 TC2911758.1s Page 98 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Comments: 1987-11-19 00:00:00 Completed Date: Certification Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30240011 Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Type: 400038 Alias Name: EPA (FRS Alias Type: 110033605962 Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: CONTINENTAL MOULDING FACILITY Alias Name: SOIL Potential Description: 30032-NO,30386-NO,30593-NO Confirmed COC: 30032, 30386, 30593 Potential COC: MANUFACTURING - OTHER Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.86205 Longitude: 33.817994444444402 Latitude: Responsible Party Funding: NO Restricted Use: 11/19/1987 Status Date: Certified Status: Not reported Special Program Status: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: 400038 Site Code: Cypress Division Branch: Thomas Cota Supervisor: Not reported Project Manager: Not reported Lead Agency Description: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NO National Priorities List: 12 Acres: State Response or NPL Site Type Detail: State Response Site Type: 30240011 Facility ID: RESPONSE: Not reported Special Programs Name: Not reported Special Programs Code: CONTINENTAL MOULDING FACILITYCONTINENTAL MOLDING Alternate Name: 400038 ID Value: CALSTARS CODE ID Name: CONTINENTAL MOLDING (Continued) S105749951 TC2911758.1s Page 99 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Comments: 1987-11-19 00:00:00 Completed Date: Certification Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30240011 Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Type: 400038 Alias Name: EPA (FRS Alias Type: 110033605962 Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: CONTINENTAL MOULDING FACILITY Alias Name: SOIL Potential Description: 30032-NO,30386-NO,30593-NO Confirmed COC: 30032, 30386, 30593 Potential COC: MANUFACTURING - OTHER Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.86205 Longitude: 33.817994444444402 Latitude: Responsible Party Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: 11/19/1987 Status Date: Certified Status: Not reported Special Program: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: 400038 Site Code: 30240011 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: Thomas Cota Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: 12 Acres: State Response or NPL Site Type Detailed: State Response Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: CONTINENTAL MOLDING (Continued) S105749951 TC2911758.1s Page 100 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation RECOMMENDATION TO LISTING SITE INSPECTION. SITE SCREENING DONE EPA EVALUATED DHS’ SITE INSPECTION AND CHANGED Comments: 1989-10-04 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: and Sdc = 0. pathway scores were: Sgw = 30.04; Ssw = 2.61; Sa = 0; Sfe = 20.83; SI performed in Sept. 1988. The migration score was 17.43. Other A Hazard Ranking Scoring package was prepared by DTSC staff using the Comments: 1992-12-10 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30280027 Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Type: 400519 Alias Name: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAD008352361 Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CUSHION COMPANY Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC. Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: 10003, 10199, 20015, 30160 Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.864290118299 Longitude: 33.821160324602999 Latitude: EPA Grant Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: 2/17/1995 Status Date: Inactive - Needs Evaluation Status: EPA - PASI Special Program: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: 400519 Site Code: 30280027 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: * HSALLOUM Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: 0 Acres: Evaluation Site Type Detailed: Evaluation Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: 5168 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster N 0.979 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 190 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92667 ENE 2060 NORTH BATAVIA N/A N57 ENVIROSTOR GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY S101481415 TC2911758.1s Page 101 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED FROM INDUSTRIAL WASTE SURVEY-1980. Comments: 1982-06-23 00:00:00 Completed Date: * Discovery Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: MANUFACTURES POLYURETHANE FOAM PRODUCTS SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: ADDITIONAL INFO NEEDED Comments: 1986-11-05 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: PRELIM ASSESS DONE AREA OF SUSP. DUMPING SHOULDBE SAMPLED LABELING AND STORAGEPROBLEMS. RELEASED WASTE NEEDS REMEDIATING. INSPECTION(LOCAL) 1987, 85, 86-VIOLATIONS NOTED AT EACH DRIVEBY. Comments: 1987-06-04 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: BY LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES HRS PACKAGE WILL BE PREPARED SITE INSP DONE STAFF RECOMMENDS COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS BE CONDUCTED Comments: 1988-08-30 00:00:00 Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY (Continued) S101481415 FRED E LELVIS Contact: CAD008352361 EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92865 2060 N BATAVIA ST Facility address: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 07/08/2009 Date form received by agency: RCRA-TSDF: HWP ENVIROSTOR EMI SWEEPS UST HIST UST CA FID UST WDS 5170 ft. FINDS Site 2 of 2 in cluster N 0.979 mi. TRIS Relative: Higher Actual: 190 ft. 1/2-1 RCRA-LQG ORANGE, CA 92865 ENE CERC-NFRAP 2060 N BATAVIA ST 92665GRFM 20 N58 RCRA-TSDF FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 102 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation No Furnace exemption: No On-site burner exemption: No Underground injection activity: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No U.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reported Owner/Op end date: 06/12/2009 Owner/Op start date: Operator Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator country: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator address: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Owner/operator name: Not reported Owner/Op end date: 06/01/1981 Owner/Op start date: Owner Owner/Operator Type: Private Legal status: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: US Owner/operator country: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 PO BOX 1219 Owner/operator address: CAL EAGLE Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during any Description: Large Quantity Generator Classification: Not reported TSD commencement date: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous Description: TSDF Classification: Private Land type: 09 EPA Region: [EMAIL REDACTED] Contact email: 231 Telephone ext.: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact telephone: US Contact country: ORANGE, CA 92865 2060 N BATAVIA ST Contact address: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 103 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX LP - ORANGE Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 10/12/2000 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX, L.P. Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 02/04/2002 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX LP Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 02/05/2004 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX, L.P. Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 02/27/2006 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX, L.P. Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 02/22/2008 Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Not reported Generated waste on-site: Yes Accumulated waste on-site: Thermostats Waste type: Not reported Generated waste on-site: No Accumulated waste on-site: Pesticides Waste type: Not reported Generated waste on-site: Yes Accumulated waste on-site: Lamps Waste type: Not reported Generated waste on-site: Yes Accumulated waste on-site: Batteries Waste type: No Generated waste on-site: No Accumulated waste on-site: Other Waste type: Universal Waste Summary: Commercial status unknown Off-site waste receiver: No Used oil transporter: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No User oil refiner: No Used oil processor: No Used oil fuel burner: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 104 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS Waste name: D002 Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF Waste name: D001 Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX LP Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 07/21/1980 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: GREAT WESTERN FOAM PRODUCTS CO. Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 03/26/1990 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: GREAT WESTERN FOAM PRODUCTS Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 02/17/1992 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 03/14/1994 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 03/14/1996 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX LP Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 09/01/1996 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX LP Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 11/25/1997 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX LP Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 11/25/1997 Date form received by agency: Large Quantity Generator Classification: FOAMEX, L.P. Site name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC Facility name: 03/04/1999 Date form received by agency: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 105 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Regulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: CA029ST Event: 01/01/1990 Event date: CA049SI Event: 10/04/1989 Event date: CA049PA Event: 06/01/1988 Event date: Corrective Action Summary: 5030 Amount (Lbs): BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T) Waste name: U223 Waste code: 5030 Amount (Lbs): OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS Waste name: D003 Waste code: 7525 Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF Waste name: D001 Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2009 Biennial Reports: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T) Waste name: U223 Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS Waste name: D003 Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 106 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation LDR - General Area of violation: F - 268.7 Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/30/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 10/10/1989 Date achieved compliance: 12/21/1988 Date violation determined: Generators - General Area of violation: F - 262.50-60 Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 05/16/1994 Date achieved compliance: 07/23/1992 Date violation determined: Generators - General Area of violation: FR - 262.10-12.A Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/27/2006 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 08/31/2006 Date achieved compliance: 06/27/2006 Date violation determined: Generators - General Area of violation: Not reported Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/10/2009 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 06/10/2009 Date achieved compliance: 06/10/2009 Date violation determined: Generators - General Area of violation: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 107 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 10/14/2008 Evaluation date: State Evaluation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 06/10/2009 Evaluation date: State Evaluation lead agency: 06/10/2009 Date achieved compliance: Generators - General Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 06/10/2009 Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/11/1987 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 10/10/1989 Date achieved compliance: 05/15/1987 Date violation determined: Generators - General Area of violation: F - 262.50-60 Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 12/21/1988 Date achieved compliance: 12/01/1988 Date violation determined: TSD - Financial Requirements Area of violation: F - 264.140-150.H Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/30/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: State Violation lead agency: 10/10/1989 Date achieved compliance: 12/21/1988 Date violation determined: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 108 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 05/15/1987 Evaluation date: State Evaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989 Date achieved compliance: Generators - General Area of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Evaluation: 05/15/1987 Evaluation date: State Evaluation lead agency: 12/21/1988 Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial Requirements Area of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW Evaluation: 12/01/1988 Evaluation date: State Evaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989 Date achieved compliance: Generators - General Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 12/21/1988 Evaluation date: State Evaluation lead agency: 10/10/1989 Date achieved compliance: LDR - General Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 12/21/1988 Evaluation date: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation lead agency: 05/16/1994 Date achieved compliance: Generators - General Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 07/23/1992 Evaluation date: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 05/16/1994 Evaluation date: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 11/25/2003 Evaluation date: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 06/28/2005 Evaluation date: Local Evaluation lead agency: 08/31/2006 Date achieved compliance: Generators - General Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: 06/27/2006 Evaluation date: State Evaluation lead agency: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 109 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Higher priority for further assessment Priority Level: 10/04/1989 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: SITE INSPECTION Action: Low priority for further assessment Priority Level: 06/01/1988 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Action: Not reported Priority Level: 05/01/1988 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: DISCOVERY Action: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: ORANGE, CA 2060 N. BATAVIA Alias Address: FOAMEX Alias Name: CA Not reported Alias Address: GENERAL TIRE RUBBER Alias Name: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Alias Name(s): (415) 972-3096 Contact Tel: Matt Mitguard Contact Name: Not reported Contact Title: (415) 972-3219 Contact Tel: Karen Jurist Contact Name: Not reported Contact Title: (415) 972-3095 Contact Tel: Jeff Inglis Contact Name: Not reported Contact Title: (415) 972-3162 Contact Tel: Brunilda Davila Contact Name: Not reported Contact Title: (415) 972-3814 Contact Tel: Carl Brickner Contact Name: Not reported Contact Title: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Name(s): NFRAP Non NPL Status: Not on the NPL NPL Status: Not a Federal Facility Federal Facility: 0903287 Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: State Evaluation lead agency: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Area of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Evaluation: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 110 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that is Facility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid or Facility Type: Santa Ana River 30I011543 Facility ID: CA WDS: 112(r) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). certain flammable or toxic substances, as required under section plans reported by companies that handle, manufacture, use, or store US EPA Risk Management Plan (RMP) database stores the risk management corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information Environmental Interest/Information System 110000480122 Registry ID: FINDS: Not reported Priority Level: 06/24/1999 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: PRE-CERCLIS SCREENING Action: NFRAP: No further Remedial Action planned Priority Level: 11/04/1991 Date Completed: 09/18/1990 Date Started: EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION Action: Not reported Priority Level: 11/04/1991 Date Completed: Not reported Date Started: ARCHIVE SITE Action: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 111 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation STATE Region: HIST UST: Active Status: Not reported Comments: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported Contact: ORANGE 92665 Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reported Mailing Address 2: 2060 N BATAVIA Mailing Address: Not reported Mail To: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Phone: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Cortese Code: 00009108 Regulated ID: UTNKA Regulated By: 30008333 Facility ID: CA FID UST: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such as Complexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board order Treat To Water: Not reported POTW: Not reported Reclamation: 0 Baseline Flow: 0 Design Flow: Not reported Secondary Waste Type: Not reported Secondary Waste: Not reported Primary Waste Type: Not reported Primary Waste: Not reported SIC Code 2: 3086 SIC Code: Private Agency Type: [PHONE REDACTED] Agency Telephone: FRED LELVIS Agency Contact: ORANGE 92865 Agency City,St,Zip: 2060 N BATAVIA ST Agency Address: FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC Agency Name: FRED LELVIS Facility Contact: [PHONE REDACTED] Facility Telephone: 8 Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7 NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 112 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation EMI: 1 Number Of Tanks: DIESEL Content: P Stg: M.V. FUEL Tank Use: 25000 Capacity: 08-16-93 Actv Date: 30-030-009108-000001 Tank Id: Not reported Owner Tank Id: A Tank Status: 10-13-88 Created Date: 08-16-93 Act Date: 08-16-93 Ref Date: 44-016895 Board Of Equalization: 1 Number: 9108 Comp Number: A Status: SWEEPS UST: Visual Leak Detection: 1/4 inches Tank Construction: REGULAR Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00010000 Tank Capacity: 1968 Year Installed: 3 Container Num: 003 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: 1/4 inches Tank Construction: DIESEL Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00012000 Tank Capacity: 1973 Year Installed: 2 Container Num: 002 Tank Num: Visual Leak Detection: 1/4 inches Tank Construction: DIESEL Type of Fuel: PRODUCT Tank Used for: 00025000 Tank Capacity: 1976 Year Installed: 1 Container Num: 001 Tank Num: ORANGE, CA 92665 Owner City,St,Zip: 2060 N. BATAVIA ST. Owner Address: GREAT WESTERN CARPET CHUSION C Owner Name: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: Not reported Contact Name: 0003 Total Tanks: MANUFACTURER Other Type: Other Facility Type: 00000009108 Facility ID: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 113 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation 3069 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: 1615 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1995 Year: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 654 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: 3069 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: 1615 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1993 Year: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 4 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 840 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 868 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: 3069 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: 1615 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1990 Year: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 474 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 474 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: 3069 SIC Code: SC Air District Name: 1615 Facility ID: SC Air Basin: 30 County Code: 1987 Year: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 114 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Not reported Comments: 1989-10-04 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 80001567 Alias Name: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30280027 Alias Name: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAD008352361 Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: 0 Longitude: 0 Latitude: Not reported Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: 1/1/2008 Status Date: * Inactive Status: Not reported Special Program: Not reported Senate: Not reported Assembly: Not reported Site Code: 80001567 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: * Unknown Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: 0 Acres: Corrective Action Site Type Detailed: Corrective Action Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 654 Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Community Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMD Air District Name: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 115 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Doc Comments: 1987-09-11 00:00:00 Actual Date: Applicant Was A Protective Filer Event Description: CONTAIN1 Unit Names: CAD008352361 EPA Id: Not reported Doc Comments: 1980-11-19 00:00:00 Actual Date: Initial Submittal Event Description: CONTAIN1 Unit Names: CAD008352361 EPA Id: Not reported Doc Comments: 1988-10-11 00:00:00 Actual Date: Approved Request Event Description: CONTAIN1 Unit Names: CAD008352361 EPA Id: HWP: Not reported Site History: Not reported Facility Status: Not reported Public Information Officer: Not reported Senate District: Not reported Assembly District: Not reported Site Code: Not reported Supervisor: Not reported Corrective Action Lead: Not reported Permit Renewal Lead: Not reported Permit Maintenance Lead: CYPRESS, GEOLOGY CAL SUPPORT Region: Not reported Cleanup Status: HAZ WASTE - NON-OPERATING Facility Type: 0 Longitude: 0 Latitude: CAD008352361 EPA Id: HWP: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Comments: 1988-06-01 00:00:00 Completed Date: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS INC (Continued) [PHONE REDACTED] TC2911758.1s Page 116 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: UNAUTHORIZED DISPOSAL OF WST TO SOIL PRELIM ASSESS DONE PRESENCE OF METALLIC DUST AT REAR OF FAC Comments: 1988-05-09 00:00:00 Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: 11, 1984. Health Care Agency issued an order to cleanup the site in December File review indicates that the site is a generator. County of Orange Comments: 1995-05-02 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID Number Alias Type: 30340167 Alias Name: EPA Identification Number Alias Type: CAD982360646 Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: VAN DOREN RUBBER COMPANY Alias Name: Alternate Name Alias Type: MARLEY HEAT TRANSFER COMPANY, THE Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: 10009, 10034, 10067, 10097, 20001, 30013, 30407 Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED APN: -117.86194444444401 Longitude: 33.817222222222199 Latitude: Not reported Funding: NONE SPECIFIED Site Mgmt. Req.: NO Restricted Use: 6/1/1995 Status Date: Refer: Other Agency Status: * CERC2 Special Program: 33 Senate: 72 Assembly: Not reported Site Code: 30340167 Facility ID: Cypress Division Branch: * MMONROY Supervisor: Not reported Program Manager: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Regulatory Agencies: NO NPL: Not reported Acres: * Historical Site Type Detailed: Historical Site Type: ENVIROSTOR: 5237 ft. 0.992 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 191 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92667 ENE 2095 NORTH BATAVIA N/A 59 ENVIROSTOR VAN DOREN RUBBER CO, INC. S101661339 TC2911758.1s Page 117 ---PAGE BREAK--- MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance EPA ID Number Database(s) Site Elevation Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID DURING A FIELD CHECK IN ORANGE. Comments: 1982-06-23 00:00:00 Completed Date: * Discovery Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: NFA for DTSC. Health Care Agency issued an Order to clean up the site on 12/11/84. File review indicates that the site is a generator. County of Orange Comments: 1995-06-01 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Area Name: DRUMS. ADDITIONAL RESEARCH REQ TO DETERMINE TYPES OF CHEMICALS USED SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: VACANT VACILITY WITH ABANDONED Comments: 1986-09-12 00:00:00 Completed Date: Site Screening Completed Document Type: VAN DOREN RUBBER CO, INC. (Continued) S101661339 TC2911758.1s Page 118 ---PAGE BREAK--- ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) ANAHEIM S108748971 JAGUAR LITHO INC DBA J&L IMAGING C 1500TH S SUNKIST AVE STE I & J 92806 HAZNET ANAHEIM S105642458 1X MCKESSON DRUG CO 2ND & 3 MI DUE SOUTH NEWPORT B LUST, CHMIRS, HAZNET ANAHEIM [PHONE REDACTED] ITASCO 2211 E HOWELL AVE 92806 CERC-NFRAP ANAHEIM [PHONE REDACTED] BURRIS SAND PIT 15292 E LINCOLN AVE 92806 CERC-NFRAP ANAHEIM [PHONE REDACTED] 1261 PLACENTIA STREET 1261 PLACENTIA ST US CDL ANAHEIM S109349403 PLACENTA STREET SWEEPER TRANDFER S 1561 N PLACENTIA AVE SWF/LF ANAHEIM S105022516 SHELL SERVICE STATION 210 STATE COLL 92806 HIST CORTESE ANAHEIM U001578893 STATION 114 420 STATE COLL 92806 HIST UST ANAHEIM S109284878 FORMER TEXACO STATION 1001 W STATE COLLEGE 92805 LUST ANAHEIM S109284901 ARCO #1994 700 E STATE COLLEGE 92805 LUST ANAHEIM S105850478 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US 201 STATE COLLEGE BLVD., S. 92805 LUST ANAHEIM 99612823 TRANSITION ROAD FROM WEST STATE HW TRANSITION ROAD FROM WEST STAT ERNS TC2911758.1s Page 119 ---PAGE BREAK--- To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 07/02/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] EPA Region 10 Telephone [PHONE REDACTED] Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 07/02/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC2911758.1s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 07/02/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 01/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPAa??s Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/02/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC2911758.1s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 05/25/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 124 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2911758.1s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 07/09/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 08/18/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. TC2911758.1s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 08/18/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 08/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC2911758.1s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. For more information on a particular leaking underground storage tank sites, please contact the appropriate regulatory agency. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. TC2911758.1s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. TC2911758.1s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. TC2911758.1s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 08/05/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/02/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 08/05/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 08/27/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 08/30/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 11/04/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal registered storage tank lists TC2911758.1s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 09/20/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 08/05/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 08/30/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). TC2911758.1s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 08/03/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/11/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 08/27/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/02/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. TC2911758.1s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 08/18/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA’s Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities--especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots--minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA’s Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 06/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2911758.1s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 07/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/18/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. TC2911758.1s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 08/18/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 08/19/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 131 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC2911758.1s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2010 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2911758.1s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2010 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards partner with the Department of Defense (DoD) through the Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) to oversee the investigation and remediation of water quality issues at military facilities. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Other Ascertainable Records TC2911758.1s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- RCRA-NonGen: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 04/11/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC2911758.1s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2002 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC2911758.1s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 109 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC2911758.1s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/18/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC2911758.1s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 08/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 07/08/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Proposition 65 Notification Records. NOTIFY 65 contains facility notifications about any release which could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. Date of Government Version: 10/21/1993 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/1993 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/1993 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC2911758.1s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Cleaner Facilities A list of related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 09/15/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/19/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SCRD State Coalition for Remediation of Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 05/12/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 96 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2911758.1s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 07/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 09/03/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 11/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 07/21/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 08/09/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/11/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2010 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. TC2911758.1s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 09/27/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINANCIAL ASSURANCE: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 03/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: N/A PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2009 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Historical Auto Stations: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. TC2911758.1s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Historical Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 07/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 08/16/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2010 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. TC2911758.1s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 07/19/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LOS ANGELES COUNTY: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 07/26/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2010 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. TC2911758.1s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 02/09/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/04/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/28/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2003 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 07/07/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 07/19/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 07/09/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. TC2911758.1s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Date of Government Version: 01/15/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2008 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 08/05/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 08/05/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 08/05/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 08/04/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2010 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC2911758.1s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Health Services Agency Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 07/26/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2010 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 09/09/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC2911758.1s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 07/15/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC2911758.1s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA CLARA COUNTY: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 05/29/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2009 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2009 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/29/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually SOLANO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: TC2911758.1s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 07/12/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan Waste Producer and/or Underground Tank information. Date of Government Version: 07/26/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2010 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2009 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/15/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: TC2911758.1s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/26/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/19/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 07/28/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/11/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2010 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/22/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/26/2010 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC2911758.1s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. Telephone: (281) 769-2247 U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. TC2911758.1s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC2911758.1s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ---PAGE BREAK--- B. OTHER RECORDS ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- INFLUENTEFFLUENT MTBE CUMULATIVE VFH CUMULATIVE TOTAL FLOW CATALYST MASS MTBE MASS VFH VACUUM RATE TEMP REMOVED MASS REMOVED MASS (In. H2O) (SCFM) (DEG F) (LBS) REMOVED (LBS) REMOVED 01/11/04 4 4 15 181 758 275 0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 01/12/04 23 27 15 171 760 235 1 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.5 01/13/04 20 47 15 176 753 250 0 0.7 1.5 1.2 2.7 01/14/04 25 72 15 177 760 380 1 21 ND<1.2 12 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.8 2.4 1.5 4.1 01/15/04 37 109 15 172 766 260 0 1.2 3.6 2.1 6.3 01/16/04 28 137 15 175 764 235 1 0.9 4.5 1.6 7.9 01/17/04 10 147 15 186 771 230 1 0.4 4.8 0.6 8.5 01/18/04 24 171 15 176 754 205 0 0.8 5.7 1.4 9.9 01/19/04 21 192 16 186 756 183 1 0.7 6.4 1.3 11.2 01/20/04 23 215 15 176 752 176 0 0.8 7.2 1.3 12.6 01/21/04 25 240 17 184 753 161 1 0.9 8.0 1.5 14.1 01/22/04 23 263 18 188 755 156 0 0.8 8.9 1.4 15.5 01/23/04 27 290 17 180 752 136 1 0.9 9.8 1.6 17.1 01/24/04 26 316 15 176 753 122 0 0.9 10.7 1.5 18.7 01/25/04 22 338 16 180 756 102 1 0.8 11.4 1.3 20.0 01/26/04 22 360 16 181 752 86 0 0.8 12.2 1.3 21.3 01/29/04 46 406 0 0 0 0.0 12.2 0.0 21.3 System off - high k/o tank water level, trans. pump under repair 02/05/04 0 406 16 184 752 54 1 0.0 12.2 0.0 21.3 Restarted SVE system after transfer pump repair 02/12/04 156 562 16 / 35 176 751 64 0 35 ND<1.2 20 ND<2.4 ND<0.059 8.7 20.9 15.2 36.5 Partially closed select wells 02/19/04 155 717 35 186 753 36 0 9.1 30.0 16.0 52.5 02/25/04 163 880 30 173 750 26 1 8.9 38.9 15.6 68.1 03/03/04 154 1,034 30 176 751 21 0 8.6 47.5 15.0 83.1 Shut down system to resheave blower 03/11/04 0 1,034 30 151 752 28 1 24 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.0 47.5 0.0 83.1 03/17/04 166 1,200 35 161 752 23 0 1.2 48.7 10.2 93.3 03/25/04 174 1,374 35 171 753 18 1 1.3 50.0 11.3 104.6 04/01/04 5 1,379 35 161 753 15 1 0.0 50.0 0.3 104.9 04/08/04 209 1,588 36 157 752 13 1 1.5 51.5 12.5 117.4 04/14/04 18 1,606 35 156 751 12 0 22 ND<1.2 2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.1 51.6 1.0 118.3 04/22/04 184 1,790 35 139 752 11 1 1.1 52.7 8.9 127.3 04/28/04 145 1,935 20 126 753 220 5 0.8 53.6 6.4 133.6 05/05/04 165 2,100 21 169 752 220 6 1.2 54.8 9.7 143.3 05/12/04 169 2,269 1.3 56.1 9.9 153.3 Unit down - blower under repair 05/20/04 4 2,273 0.0 56.1 0.2 153.5 Restarted unit after blower motor repairs (new pulleys) 05/21/04 15 2,288 53 192 773 140 10 27 ND<1.2 11 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.5 56.6 1.2 154.7 05/25/04 100 2,388 178 751 150 10 3.1 59.7 7.6 162.4 06/04/04 236 2,624 50 183 752 140 10 7.5 67.2 18.5 180.8 06/09/04 123 2,747 50 188 761 160 0 29 ND<1.2 15 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 5.5 72.7 10.6 191.4 06/16/04 161 2,908 50 181 769 120 0 6.9 79.6 13.4 204.8 06/21/04 127 3,035 51 187 770 150 0 5.6 85.3 10.9 215.7 07/02/04 263 3,298 48 191 758 140 0 11.9 97.2 23.1 238.8 07/09/04 97 3,395 4.4 101.6 8.5 247.3 Unit down for blower bearings repair 07/15/04 0 3,395 189 753 0.0 101.6 0.0 247.3 Restarted system after blower repairs 07/16/04 23 3,418 45 189 752 140 0 27 ND<1.2 11 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.8 102.3 1.9 249.1 07/22/04 144 3,562 46 189 760 160 22 4.7 107.1 11.6 260.8 07/27/04 126 3,688 45 189 753 150 24 4.1 111.2 10.2 270.9 08/03/04 164 3,852 46 189 767 150 20 28 ND<1.2 7.6 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 3.7 115.0 13.7 284.7 08/12/04 214 4,066 45 189 753 140 25 4.9 119.8 17.9 302.6 08/17/04 120 4,186 45 189 762 150 25 2.7 122.6 10.1 312.7 08/24/04 168 4,354 44 189 753 140 28 3.8 126.4 14.1 326.7 09/01/04 192 4,546 43 189 765 130 25 7.9 ND<1.2 8.7 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 5.0 131.4 4.5 331.3 09/08/04 168 4,714 41 188 752 140 28 4.4 135.7 4.0 335.2 09/17/04 218 4,932 23 189 759 140 34 5.7 141.4 5.2 340.4 09/24/04 166 5,098 22 189 759 130 31 4.3 145.7 3.9 344.3 09/30/04 149 5,247 18 189 737 1.8 0.0 3.9 149.6 3.5 347.8 10/06/04 141 5,388 16 189 726 1.7 0.0 7.8 ND<1.2 7.7 6.4 ND<1.2 3.3 152.8 3.3 351.1 10/13/04 167 5,555 8 189 725 60.2 1.2 3.8 156.7 3.9 355.0 10/21/04 199 5,754 10 189 787 44.4 0.0 4.6 161.3 4.6 359.7 10/28/04 159 5,913 8 189 777 23.1 0.0 3.7 164.9 3.7 363.4 Restarted system - high water level in knockout tank 11/03/04 138 6,051 10 189 771 205 23.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 8.4 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 3.5 168.4 0.0 363.4 11/12/04 123 6,173 12 189 760 30.1 12.2 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 6.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 2.5 170.9 0.0 363.4 Shutdown system at departure for rebound test OPERATING HOURS CUMULATIV E OPERATING HOURS DATE MONITORED TABLE 1 SVE SYSTEM OPERATIONAL DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 Anaheim, CA 2445 E. Ball Road ( PID-PPMV) ( LAB-PPMV) VFH CONC. VFH BENZENE MTBE Wells VE-1, VE-2, VE-3, VE-4, VE-5, AB1, AB2, B-3, and B-4 connected to system BENZENE INFLUENT CONC. EFFLUENT CONC. COMMENTS ( LAB-PPMV) VFH SVE_system_tables.xls 1 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- INFLUENTEFFLUENT MTBE CUMULATIVE VFH CUMULATIVE TOTAL FLOW CATALYST MASS MTBE MASS VFH VACUUM RATE TEMP REMOVED MASS REMOVED MASS (In. H2O) (SCFM) (DEG F) (LBS) REMOVED (LBS) REMOVED OPERATING HOURS CUMULATIV E OPERATING HOURS DATE MONITORED TABLE 1 SVE SYSTEM OPERATIONAL DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 Anaheim, CA 2445 E. Ball Road ( PID-PPMV) ( LAB-PPMV) VFH CONC. VFH BENZENE MTBE BENZENE INFLUENT CONC. EFFLUENT CONC. COMMENTS ( LAB-PPMV) VFH 12/01/04 5 6,178 10 189 754 41.9 15.2 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.4 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 0.0 170.9 0.0 363.4 Restarted system for rebound test 12/08/04 65 6,243 12 189 764 15.8 0.0 0.3 171.2 0.0 363.4 Restarted system - high water level in knockout tank 12/17/04 212 6,455 0 0 0 0.0 171.2 0.0 363.4 Unit down at arrival, restarted system - system not reaching temperature, shut down at departure 12/22/04 5 6,460 0 0 0 0.0 171.2 0.0 363.4 Restarted system - temperature still low after 5 hours of operation, shut system down and contacted manufacturer for 01/06/05 0 6,460 0 0 0 0.0 171.2 0.0 363.4 System off - electrical repairs needed 01/18/05 2 6,462 24 189 750 0.0 171.2 0.0 363.4 Restarted system 01/20/05 47 6,508 18 189 751 74.4 4.8 3.0 ND<1.6 4.9 3.3 ND<1.6 0.7 171.9 0.4 363.8 01/24/05 45 6,553 20 189 754 56.7 0.0 0.7 172.5 0.4 364.2 Restarted system - high water level in knockout tank 02/01/05 186 6,739 22 189 763 50.8 1.7 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 7.5 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 4.2 176.7 0.0 364.2 Shutdown system at departure per APUD approval 10/17/05 16 6,754 20 189 763 0.0 2.9 ND<1.2 3.4 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.2 176.9 0.1 364.3 Restarted system 10/25/05 196 6,950 22 189 765 9.8 0.0 2.0 178.9 1.7 366.0 11/01/05 111 7,062 0 0.0 178.9 0.0 366.0 Restarted system - high water level in knockout tank 11/17/05 167 7,229 28 189 768 23.8 0.0 1.7 180.6 1.5 367.5 Restarted system - high water level in knockout tank 11/23/05 42 7,271 29 189 750 0.0 0.0 5.8 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 3.1 ND<1.2 0.4 180.9 0.7 368.2 11/30/05 24 7,295 30 192 755 0.0 0.0 0.2 181.1 0.4 368.6 Restarted system - high water level in knockout tank 12/06/05 59 7,354 0 0 0 0.0 181.1 0.0 368.6 System down - repairs on combustion blower 12/16/05 0 7,354 29 166 752 55 0.0 4.2 ND<1.2 3.9 3.9 ND<1.2 0.0 181.1 0.0 368.6 Completed repairs and restarted system 12/22/05 86 7,440 30 177 751 40 0.0 0.9 182.1 1.0 369.6 Restarted system 12/28/05 145 7,585 30 179 752 45 0.0 1.6 183.7 1.7 371.4 01/03/06 149 7,734 30 166 752 52 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 4.6 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 1.8 185.5 0.0 371.4 01/26/06 554 8,288 30 165 748 53 0.0 6.7 192.1 0.0 371.4 02/02/06 6 8,294 30 165 746 54.0 0.0 0.1 192.2 0.0 371.4 Restarted system at arrival 02/08/06 62 8,356 30 165 746 54.3 0.0 0.7 192.9 0.0 371.4 Restarted system at arrival 02/15/06 153 8,509 30 165 750 60.9 0.0 1.8 194.8 0.0 371.4 Restarted system at arrival 02/22/06 82 8,591 30 165 751 65.4 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.6 195.4 0.0 371.4 Restarted system at arrival 03/01/06 68 8,659 30 165 750 64.8 0.0 0.5 195.9 0.0 371.4 Restarted system at arrival 03/09/06 191 8,850 30 165 750 58.9 0.0 1.4 197.3 0.0 371.4 03/29/06 482 9,332 30 165 752 44.5 0.0 2.9 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 2.8 ND<1.2 1.3 198.5 3.6 375.0 5/3/2006 187 9,518 8 131 739 65.6 0.0 0.4 198.9 1.1 376.1 System blower replaced in April 05/10/06 167 9,685 8 132 753 64.8 0.0 0.3 199.3 1.0 377.1 05/16/06 143 9,829 8 121 758 68.1 0.0 5.5 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.3 199.5 1.5 378.7 05/23/06 168 9,997 8 128 758 64.8 0.0 0.3 199.9 1.9 380.5 06/01/06 217 10,214 8 123 758 72.4 0.0 0.4 200.3 2.3 382.9 06/06/06 119 10,333 8 138 756 68.5 0.0 0.3 200.6 1.4 384.3 06/13/06 166 10,499 8 139 756 0.0 0.4 200.9 2.0 386.3 06/20/06 170 10,669 8 139 756 42.6 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.4 201.3 0.0 386.3 06/27/06 168 10,837 8 142 764 49.8 0.0 0.4 201.7 0.0 386.3 07/05/06 192 11,029 8 142 764 55.6 0.0 0.4 202.1 0.0 386.3 07/11/06 147 11,176 8 138 764 67.2 0.8 0.3 202.4 0.0 386.3 07/17/06 142 11,318 8 138 769 70.8 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.3 202.7 0.0 386.3 08/03/06 403 11,720 8 160 769 69.6 0.0 1.0 203.8 0.0 386.3 08/07/06 98 11,818 8 160 769 72.6 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.2 204.0 0.0 386.3 09/07/06 742 12,560 10 160 758 31.0 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 1.9 205.9 0.0 386.3 System shut down at departure for rebound evaluation 09/28/06 3.8 12,564 10 160 769 28.2 2.1 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.0 205.9 0.0 386.3 System restarted for rebound evaluation 10/06/06 190 12,754 5 108 762 156.0 0.0 0.3 206.2 0.0 386.3 10/12/06 143 12,898 8 106 760 126.0 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.2 206.5 0.0 386.3 System shut down at departure; case closure requested 11/14/07 0 12,898 7 107 777 915.0 2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 0.0 206.5 0.0 386.3 Restarted system extracting only from wells VE-6 and VE-7. Collected vapor samples. 12/04/07 125 13,023 149 753 19.3 18.6 3.2 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 2.9 ND<1.2 0.3 206.8 0.9 387.2 Restarted system. Collected vapor samples. Shut off system. 01/03/08 0 13,023 93 89 35.0 4.5 0.0 206.8 0.0 387.2 Restarted system. 01/04/08 20 13,042 73 106 72.6 3.0 0.0 206.8 0.1 387.3 01/10/08 78 13,120 69 149 31.7 5.1 0.2 207.0 0.6 387.9 01/17/08 178 13,298 52 118 25.4 2.2 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 84 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 28 235.0 0.0 387.9 Collected vapor samples. 01/22/08 118 13,416 53 119 27.1 2.1 19 253.6 0.0 387.9 01/28/08 79 13,495 54 46 25.3 1.4 4.8 258.5 0.0 387.9 02/08/08 261 13,756 51 32 36.5 0.8 11 269.6 0.0 387.9 02/14/08 134 13,890 50 43 42.1 0.0 7.7 277.2 0.0 387.9 02/19/08 106 13,996 49 44 41.9 0.0 6.2 283.4 0.0 387.9 SVE_system_tables.xls 2 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- INFLUENTEFFLUENT MTBE CUMULATIVE VFH CUMULATIVE TOTAL FLOW CATALYST MASS MTBE MASS VFH VACUUM RATE TEMP REMOVED MASS REMOVED MASS (In. H2O) (SCFM) (DEG F) (LBS) REMOVED (LBS) REMOVED OPERATING HOURS CUMULATIV E OPERATING HOURS DATE MONITORED TABLE 1 SVE SYSTEM OPERATIONAL DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 Anaheim, CA 2445 E. Ball Road ( PID-PPMV) ( LAB-PPMV) VFH CONC. VFH BENZENE MTBE BENZENE INFLUENT CONC. EFFLUENT CONC. COMMENTS ( LAB-PPMV) VFH 02/25/08 142 14,138 49 45 43.7 0.2 8.5 291.9 0.0 387.9 03/05/08 180 14,318 47 47 102.3 0.0 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 35 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 4.7 296.6 0.0 387.9 Collected vapor samples. 03/13/08 146 14,464 3.8 300.4 0.0 387.9 System off due to actuator failure 03/20/08 0 14,464 91 149 51.5 2.3 0.0 300.4 0.0 387.9 Restarted system. Hour meter broken. 03/27/08 168 14,464 90 149 60.2 0.1 13.9 314.3 0.0 387.9 Hour meter broken - operating hours estimated 03/31/08 96 14,464 95 149 56.2 0.4 7.9 322.2 0.0 387.9 Hour meter broken - operating hours estimated 04/08/08 192 14,464 93 149 775 47.1 0.6 15.8 338.0 0.0 387.9 Hour meter broken - operating hours estimated 04/16/08 192 14,464 40 149 762 40.1 4.2 15.8 353.9 0.0 387.9 Hour meter broken - operating hours estimated 04/21/08 120 14,464 40 149 774 49.7 5.2 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 59 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 16.7 370.6 0.0 387.9 Collected vapor samples. Hour meter broken - operating hours estimated 04/29/08 120 14,584 94 103 756 33.6 1.5 11.6 382.1 0.0 387.9 Hour meter replaced - operating hours estimated 05/15/08 384 14,968 88 149 763 110 8.9 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 56 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 50.7 432.8 0.0 387.9 Operating hours estimated. Collected vapor samples. 05/19/08 94 15,062 90 149 772 130 23.5 12.4 445.2 0.0 387.9 05/27/08 193 15,254 88 149 764 127 21.9 25.4 470.6 0.0 387.9 06/03/08 172 15,426 91 149 756 108 3.8 22.7 493.2 0.0 387.9 06/11/08 190 15,616 88 149 758 104 6.6 25.1 518.4 0.0 387.9 06/18/08 165 15,781 92 149 772 98.6 4.5 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 33 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 12.8 531.2 0.0 387.9 Collected vapor samples. 06/24/08 145 15,926 85 149 753 95.9 3.6 11.3 542.5 0.0 387.9 06/30/08 144 16,070 83 252 772 98.8 4.8 18.9 561.4 0.0 387.9 07/11/08 262 16,332 94 309 768 76.5 2.5 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 35 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 44.9 606.3 0.0 387.9 Collected vapor samples. 07/17/08 146 16,478 94 183 772 70.2 3.1 14.8 621.2 0.0 387.9 07/24/08 168 16,646 93 183 770 67.8 3.0 17.0 638.2 0.0 387.9 07/31/08 169 16,814 94 103 756 62.5 4.8 9.6 647.8 0.0 387.9 08/06/08 143 16,957 92 309 759 69.8 4.2 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 2.0 649.8 0.0 387.9 Collected vapor samples. 08/11/08 119 17,076 94 309 772 79.8 5.3 1.6 651.4 0.0 387.9 08/18/08 168 17,244 88 321 763 70.1 4.7 2.4 653.8 0.0 387.9 08/25/08 169 17,413 90 309 778 39.7 0.2 2.3 656.1 0.0 387.9 09/02/08 191 17,604 93 309 775 48.1 0.4 2.6 658.7 0.0 387.9 System shut off for O&M duty transition from SAIC to Delta. 10/30/08 18 17,622 90 45 769 108.0 0.9 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 27 2.4 ND<1.2 0.3 659.1 0.0 387.9 System restared. Collected vapor samples> 11/07/08 198 17,820 78 75.9 0.8 3.8 662.9 0.0 387.9 11/12/08 115 17,935 88 44 753 75.3 0.3 2.2 665.1 0.0 387.9 11/19/08 173 18,108 76 86 743 8.5 2.5 6.4 671.4 0.0 387.9 11/25/08 146 18,254 90 89 775 77.2 2.1 5.6 677.0 0.0 387.9 12/03/08 189 18,443 80 85 752 55.5 1.4 6.9 683.8 0.0 387.9 12/10/08 166 18,609 80 72 760 66.9 3.8 5.1 688.9 0.0 387.9 12/18/08 171 18,780 0.0 688.9 0.0 387.9 System shutt off for power supply trouble shooting Notes: VFH = Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons MTBE = Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether DEG F = Degrees Fahrenheit SCFM = Standard cubic feet per minute LBS = Pounds CONC. = Concentration = Not Analyzed PID = Photoionization detector (field measurement) Lab data is used to calculate mass destroyed. PPMV = Concentration in parts per million by volume Bold values exceed the AQMD permit requirements. SVE_system_tables.xls 3 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) 01/11/04 100 14 46 100 14 325 100 13 375 100 13 400 100 15 125 100 15 350 100 15 475 100 14 400 100 14 425 NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/12/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/13/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/14/04 100 40 300 100 40 380 (7.3) 100 40 360 100 40 550 (44) 100 40 330 100 40 270 (4.8) 100 40 280 (18) 100 40 490 (23) 100 40 660 (200) NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/15/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/16/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/17/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/18/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/19/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/20/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/21/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/22/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/23/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/24/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/25/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/26/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/29/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/05/04 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 50 40 40 (8.8) 100 40 55 (5.2) 50 40 33 (9.3) 100 40 76 (40) 50 40 18 (5.7) 100 40 85 (14) 100 40 93 (10) 100 40 122 (41) 100 40 166 (8.3) NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/19/04 50 NM NM 100 NM NM 50 NM NM 100 NM NM 50 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/25/04 50 NM NM 100 NM NM 50 NM NM 100 NM NM 50 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 03/03/04 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 03/11/04 0 30 18 100 30 47 0 30 12 100 30 80 0 30 16 0 30 21 100 30 54 100 30 102 100 30 114 NA NA NA NA NA NA 03/17/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 03/25/04 0 30 NM 50 30 NM 0 30 NM 100 30 NM 0 30 NM 0 30 NM 100 30 NM 100 30 NM 100 30 NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 04/01/04 0 30 NM 50 30 NM 0 30 NM 100 30 NM 0 30 NM 0 30 NM 100 30 NM 100 30 NM 100 30 NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 04/08/04 0 NM NM 50 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 04/14/04 0 35 11 (26) 50 35 39 (26) 0 35 8 (16) 100 35 44 (39) 0 35 11 (93) 0 35 14 (26) 100 35 36 (24) 100 35 76 (29) 100 35 71 (50) NA NA NA NA NA NA 04/22/04 0 NM NM 50 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 04/28/04 0 NM NM 100 20 NM 50 20 NM 100 20 NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 20 NM 0 NM NM 100 20 NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/05/04 0 NM 60 100 15 180 100 15 120 100 16 260 100 16 120 0 NM 80 100 15 110 100 16 110 100 15 130 NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/12/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/20/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/21/04 0 NM NM 100 53 140 (11) 0 NM NM 100 53 220 (14) 100 53 140 (11) 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 53 120 (24) 100 * NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/25/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 * NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/04/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/09/04 0 NM NM 100 50 160 0 NM NM 100 50 230 100 50 140 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 50 130 100 * NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/16/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/21/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/02/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/09/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/15/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/16/04 0 NM NM 100 45 140 0 NM NM 100 45 220 100 45 130 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 45 140 100 45 NM * NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/22/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/27/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 08/03/04 0 NM NM 100 44 130 0 NM NM 100 44 260 100 44 150 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 44 150 100 44 NM * NA NA NA NA NA NA 08/12/04 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM NM 100 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 08/17/04 0 NM NM 100 NM 140 0 NM NM 100 NM 270 100 NM 150 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 NM 150 100 NM NM * NA NA NA NA NA NA 08/24/04 0 NM NM 100 42 130 0 NM NM 100 42 260 100 42 150 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 42 130 100 NM NM * NA NA NA NA NA NA 09/01/04 0 NM NM 100 41 120 0 NM NM 100 41 250 100 41 130 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 41 130 100 41 120 NA NA NA NA NA NA 09/08/04 0 NM NM 100 39 140 0 NM NM 100 39 260 100 39 150 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 39 130 100 39 NM * NA NA NA NA NA NA 09/17/04 0 NM NM 100 21 110 0 NM NM 100 21 140 100 21 120 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 21 110 100 21 NM * NA NA NA NA NA NA 09/24/04 0 NM NM 100 21 110 0 NM NM 100 21 130 100 21 120 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 21 100 100 21 NM * NA NA NA NA NA NA 09/30/04 0 NM NM 100 10 0.3 0 NM NM 100 10 0.0 100 10 1.3 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 10 1.3 100 10 5.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/06/04 0 NM NM 100 10 0.0 0 NM NM 100 10 0.0 100 12 0.4 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 10 1.0 100 10 5.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/13/04 0 NM NM 100 8 6.2 0 NM NM 100 8 3.7 100 8 22.5 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 8 43.5 100 8 130.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/21/04 0 NM NM 100 10 4.9 0 NM NM 100 10 0.0 100 10 9.8 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 10 22.2 100 10 70.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/28/04 0 NM NM 100 4 0.0 0 NM NM 100 4 0.7 100 10 3.7 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 4 15.6 100 8 81.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/03/04 0 NM NM 100 8 0.0 0 NM NM 100 8 0.0 100 8 6.2 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 8 3.7 100 8 215 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/12/04 100 8 1.1 100 8 0.0 100 8 0.0 100 6 0.0 100 6 7.8 100 8 1.1 100 10 5.5 100 8 7.8 100 6 50.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 100 8 7.6 100 8 0.0 100 8 0.0 100 8 0.0 100 8 7.6 100 8 0.0 100 8 15.2 100 8 22.8 100 8 87.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/08/04 100 6 0.0 100 6 0.0 100 6 0.0 100 6 0.0 100 6 3.9 100 6 0.0 100 6 0.0 100 6 11.8 100 6 51.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/17/04 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/22/04 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/06/05 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/18/05 100 22 NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 24 NM 0 NM NM 100 22 NM 100 22 NM 100 22 NM NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/20/05 100 18 4.8 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 18 32.1 0 NM NM 100 18 5.7 100 18 41.8 100 18 105.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/24/05 100 20 0 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 20 28.3 0 NM NM 100 20 0 100 20 25.9 100 20 92.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 100 22 0 100 22 0 100 22 4.1 100 22 4.3 100 22 21.4 100 22 0 100 22 0 100 20 19.7 100 20 31.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/17/05 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 20 0.0 100 20 3.5 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 20 0.0 100 20 21.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/25/05 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 20 0.0 100 20 68.6 0 NM NM 0 NM NM 100 20 0.0 100 20 24.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/01/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA NA 100 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA NA 100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Screen 50-60 ft bgs VE-7 Screen 50-60 ft bgs VE-1 VE-2 Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 73-93 ft bgs 2445 E. Ball Road Anaheim, CA VE-6 Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 20-50 ft bgs Screen 25-55 ft bgs VE-3 VE-4 VE-5 Screen 73-93 ft bgs TABLE 2 WELL SOURCE DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 Date B-3 Screen 15-45 ft bgs B-4 Screen 20-50 ft bgs AB1 AB2 SVE_system_tables.xls 1 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Screen 50-60 ft bgs VE-7 Screen 50-60 ft bgs VE-1 VE-2 Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 73-93 ft bgs 2445 E. Ball Road Anaheim, CA VE-6 Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 20-50 ft bgs Screen 25-55 ft bgs VE-3 VE-4 VE-5 Screen 73-93 ft bgs TABLE 2 WELL SOURCE DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 Date B-3 Screen 15-45 ft bgs B-4 Screen 20-50 ft bgs AB1 AB2 11/17/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA 42.4 100 NA 45.8 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA NA* 100 NA 36.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/23/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 0.0 100 27 52.2 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 0.0 100 27 0.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/30/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 0.0 100 27 0.0 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 0.0 100 27 0.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/06/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/16/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 20 100 27 85 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 45 100 27 60 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/22/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 28 5.0 100 28 75 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 28 35 100 28 45 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/28/05 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 5.0 100 27 79 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 27 42 100 27 48 NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/03/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 28 12 100 28 84 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 28 41 100 28 56 NA NA NA NA NA NA 01/26/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 28 10.2 100 28 84.6 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 28 39.8 100 28 56.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/02/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 10.0 100 30 82.4 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 36.7 100 30 56.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/08/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 10.2 100 30 78.6 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 30.4 100 30 66.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/15/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 10.0 100 30 80.4 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 32.4 100 30 58.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 02/22/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 9.8 100 30 78.4 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 28.6 100 30 44.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 03/01/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 10.1 100 30 88.4 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 28.6 100 30 44.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 03/09/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 8.8 100 30 76.6 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 33.4 100 30 44.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 03/29/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 9.9 100 30 74.6 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 30 39.7 100 30 40.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/03/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 13.6 100 8 88.4 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 48.7 100 8 56.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/10/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 23.8 100 8 90.4 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 45.4 100 8 55.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/16/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 13.2 100 8 87.8 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 44.6 100 8 51.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 05/23/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 40.6 100 8 48.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/01/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 40.1 100 8 65.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/06/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 38.6 (4.3) 100 8 39.6 (2.9) NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/13/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 NM 100 8 NM 100 8 NM 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/20/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 1.4 100 8 0.8 100 8 0 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 06/27/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 1.0 100 8 0.8 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 12.9 100 8 42.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/05/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 1.0 100 8 1.0 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 13.2 100 8 44.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/11/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 1.2 100 8 1.2 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 11.8 100 8 36.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA 07/17/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 0.0 100 8 0.0 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 14.8 100 8 37.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 08/03/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 0.0 100 8 0.0 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 15.2 100 8 55.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 08/07/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 0.0 100 8 0.0 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 15.0 100 8 35.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 09/07/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 10 38.1 100 10 36.6 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 10 4.2 100 10 11.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 09/28/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 10 39.4 100 10 37.2 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 10 38.6 100 10 27.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/06/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 5 57 100 5 127 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 5 82 100 5 152 NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/12/06 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 0.0 100 8 0.0 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 8 15.0 100 8 35.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11/14/07 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 7 581 100 7 715 12/04/07 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA 15.4 100 NA 19.6 01/03/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 85.1 NM 100 89.8 NM 01/04/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA NM 100 NA NM 01/10/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA NM 100 NA NM 01/17/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 50.3 NM 100 50.5 NM 01/22/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 50.6 NM 100 50.7 NM 01/28/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 50.7 NM 100 51.1 NM 02/08/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 49.7 317 100 50.1 19.1 02/14/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 48.2 402 100 49.4 25.3 02/19/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 47.1 386 100 49.0 26.1 02/25/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 46.7 364 100 48.1 24 03/05/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 46.1 184.7 100 46.8 19.2 03/13/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 NA NA 100 NA NA 03/20/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 92 144 100 91 19.8 03/27/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 94 77.1 100 94 23.5 03/31/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 95 98.7 100 95 25.1 04/08/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 93 77.3 100 93 135 04/16/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 40 47.9 100 40 4.6 04/21/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 40 79.3 100 40 10.7 04/29/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 95.2 55.3 100 93.1 12.5 05/15/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 88 162 100 88 63.7 05/19/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 90 172 100 90 42.2 05/27/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 88 143 100 88 38.3 06/03/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 91 145 100 92 34 06/11/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 88 130 100 88 2.1 06/18/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 92 138 100 92 28.4 06/24/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 85 134 100 85 30.8 06/30/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 83 141 100 83 17.2 07/11/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 93.5 117 100 93.5 25.9 07/17/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 93.5 127 100 93.5 18.5 07/24/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 93.4 118 100 93.4 27.1 07/31/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 87 101 100 87 27.8 08/06/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 87 99.7 100 88 28.2 08/11/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 87 118 100 88 34.1 08/18/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 87 115 100 87 29.8 08/25/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 90 76.2 100 90 6.4 09/02/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 93 62.3 100 93 10.7 SVE_system_tables.xls 2 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. % Vacuum VFH Conc. Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Open (In. H2O) (ppmv) Screen 50-60 ft bgs VE-7 Screen 50-60 ft bgs VE-1 VE-2 Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 73-93 ft bgs 2445 E. Ball Road Anaheim, CA VE-6 Screen 73-93 ft bgs Screen 20-50 ft bgs Screen 25-55 ft bgs VE-3 VE-4 VE-5 Screen 73-93 ft bgs TABLE 2 WELL SOURCE DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 Date B-3 Screen 15-45 ft bgs B-4 Screen 20-50 ft bgs AB1 AB2 10/30/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 90 188 100 90 28.1 11/07/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 78 133 100 78 16.9 11/12/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 88 129 50 88 17.7 11/19/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 76 12 50 76 5.3 11/25/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 90 127 40 66 17.1 12/03/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 82 93 50 76 25.3 12/10/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 100 80 81.2 50 75 31 12/18/08 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA 0 NA NA Notes: VFH = Volatile fuel hydrocarbons NA = Not Available ppmv = Parts per million by volume ft bgs = Feet below ground surface NM = Not Measured * = water in line, data not collected Wells VE-1 through VE-5 are dual completion air sparge/vapor extraction well VFH concentrations are field readings measured by a photo-ionization detector or flame-ionization detect ( ) indicates VFH concentrations from laboratory analysis by EPA Method 801 SVE_system_tables.xls 3 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Total Xylenes (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) VE-1 01/14/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 8.8 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 26 ND<1.2 3.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA VE-2 01/14/04 7.3 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 5.9 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 5.2 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 3.5 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 26 ND<1.2 2.7 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 3.2 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 05/21/04 11 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 18 NA NA NA NA NA 07/16/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 5.5 NA NA NA NA NA 08/03/04 12 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 4.5 NA NA NA NA NA 09/01/04 2.7 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA VE-3 01/14/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 22 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 9.3 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 16 ND<1.2 3.8 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 06/20/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA VE-4 01/14/04 44 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 42 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 40 ND<12 ND<11 ND<9.2 ND<18 510 ND<24 ND<27 ND<24 ND<330 NA 04/14/04 39 ND<1.2 5.9 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 12 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 05/21/04 14 ND<12 ND<11 ND<9.2 ND<18 520 NA NA NA NA NA 07/16/04 9.0 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 350/320* NA NA NA NA NA 08/03/04 8.2 ND<6.2 ND<5.3 ND<4.6 ND<9.2 490 NA NA NA NA NA 09/01/04 4.7 ND<25 ND<21 ND<18 ND<37 370 NA NA NA NA NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 10/17/05 2.9 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 01/03/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 5.5 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 06/20/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/07/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/28/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 10/12/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA VE-5 01/14/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 1.9 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 5.7 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 4.5 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 93 ND<1.2 13 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 5.6 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 05/21/04 11 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 2.1 23 NA NA NA NA NA 07/16/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 8.1 NA NA NA NA NA 08/03/04 12 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 13 NA NA NA NA NA 09/01/04 2.9 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 10 NA NA NA NA NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 3.7 NA NA NA NA NA 10/17/05 2.6 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 3.8 NA NA NA NA NA 01/03/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 06/20/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/07/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/28/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 10/12/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA TBA Toluene Well / Sample ID Sample Date VFH Benzene Ethanol TABLE 3 INDIVIDUAL WELL VAPOR ANALYTICAL DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 2445 East Ball Road Anaheim, CA MTBE DIPE ETBE TAME SVE_system_tables.xls 1 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Total Xylenes (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) TBA Toluene Well / Sample ID Sample Date VFH Benzene Ethanol TABLE 3 INDIVIDUAL WELL VAPOR ANALYTICAL DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 2445 East Ball Road Anaheim, CA MTBE DIPE ETBE TAME VE-6 11/14/07 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 12/04/07 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 01/17/08 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 9.3 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 03/05/08 17 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 50 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 04/22/08 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 130 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 07/11/08 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 48 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 10/30/08 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 47 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 VE-7 11/14/07 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 12/04/07 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 01/17/08 3.0 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 37 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 03/05/08 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 28 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 04/22/08 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 07/11/08 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 9.0 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 10/30/08 3.0 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 7.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 AB-1 01/14/04 4.8 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 13 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 14 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 26 ND<1.2 2.9 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA AB-2 01/14/04 18 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 40 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 10 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 4.3 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 24 ND<1.2 2.6 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA B-3 01/14/04 23 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 31 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 41 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 40 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 29 ND<1.2 3.5 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 4.0 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 05/21/04 24 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 1.8 7.4 NA NA NA NA NA 07/16/04 32 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 6.9 NA NA NA NA NA 08/03/04 29 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 7.3 NA NA NA NA NA 09/01/04 10 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 10 NA NA NA NA NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 3.6 NA NA NA NA NA 10/17/05 2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 01/03/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 06/06/06 4.3 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/07/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/28/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 10/12/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA B-4 01/14/04 200 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 92 NA NA NA NA NA 02/12/04 8.3 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 6.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 04/14/04 50 ND<1.2 5.9 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/01/04 2.8 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 NA NA NA NA NA 11/12/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 15 NA NA NA NA NA 12/01/04 ND<2.4 ND<1.6 ND<1.3 ND<1.2 ND<3.5 ND<1.4 NA NA NA NA NA 02/01/05 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 13 NA NA NA NA NA 10/17/05 2.7 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 6.5 NA NA NA NA NA 01/03/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 7.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 06/06/06 2.9 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 5.1 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/07/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 09/28/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA 10/12/06 ND<2.4 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 ND<2.8 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 NA SVE_system_tables.xls 2 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Total Xylenes (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) TBA Toluene Well / Sample ID Sample Date VFH Benzene Ethanol TABLE 3 INDIVIDUAL WELL VAPOR ANALYTICAL DATA ARCO Facility No. 6132 2445 East Ball Road Anaheim, CA MTBE DIPE ETBE TAME B-4-Start 08/17/05 10 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 11 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 B-4-Mid 08/17/05 5.8 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 10 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 B-4-End 08/17/05 5.1 ND<1.2 ND<1.1 ND<0.92 ND<1.8 12 ND<2.4 ND<2.7 ND<2.4 ND<33 ND<160 Notes: VFH = Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons PPMV = Parts per million by volume MTBE DIPE ETBE TAME TBA ND< = Not detected at or above the stated laboratory reporting limi * = Initial analysis exceeded calibration range, result is semi-quantitative; re-analysis was performed past the holding time Wells VE-1 through VE-5 are dual completion air sparge/vapor extraction wells = Tertiary Butanol = Di-isopropyl Ether = Ethyl Tertiary Butyl Ether = Tertiary Amyl Methyl Ether = Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether SVE_system_tables.xls 3 of 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix D Acoustical Assessment, Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements Project, RBF Consulting, 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618. Contact: Mr. Eddie Torres, INCE, REA. ---PAGE BREAK--- ACOUSTICAL ASSESSMENT for the Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Consultant: RBF CONSULTING 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 92618 Contact: Mr. Eddie Torres, INCE, REA Director of Technical Studies [PHONE REDACTED] December 2010 JN 10‐107037 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment i December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT 2 1.1 Project Location 2 1.2 Project 2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF NOISE METRICS 6 2.1 Standard Unit of 6 2.2 Health Effects of Noise 6 3.0 LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, AND STANDARDS 11 3.1 U.S. Environmental Protection 11 3.2 California Environmental Quality 11 3.3 Local 12 4.0 EXISTING 14 4.1 Noise Measurements 14 4.2 Sensitive 14 4.3 Existing Noise 16 5.0 POTENTIAL ACOUSTICAL IMPACTS 18 6.0 REFERENCES 25 6.1 List of 25 6.2 25 6.3 25 APPENDIX A – NOISE MEASUREMENT SHEETS APPENDIX B – MODELING DATA ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment ii December 2010 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 – Regional Vicinity 3 Exhibit 2 – Site Vicinity 4 Exhibit 3 – Site Plan 5 Exhibit 4 – Common Environmental Noise Levels 7 Exhibit 5 – Noise Measurement Locations 15 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Noise Descriptors 8 Table 2 – Noise Sensitivity of Land 12 Table 3 – Noise 14 Table 4 – Sensitive 16 Table 5 – Existing Traffic Noise Levels 17 Table 6 – Construction Noise Levels 19 Table 7 – 2030 Traffic Noise 21 Table 8 – Typical Vibration Levels for Construction 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment iii December 2010 DEFINITIONS OF COMMONLY USED TERMS IN NOISE CONTROL The definitions that follow are in general agreement with those contained in publications of various professional organizations, including the American National Standards Institute (ANSI); the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air‐Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE); the International Organization for Standardization (ISO); and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). TERMINOLOGY acoustic; acoustical: Acoustic is usually used when the term being qualified designates something that has the properties, dimensions, or physical characteristics associated with sound waves acoustic power); acoustical is usually used when the term which it modifies does not explicitly designate something that has the properties, dimensions, or physical characteristics of sound acoustical material). ambient noise: The all‐encompassing noise associated with a given environment at a specified time, usually being a composite of sound from many sources arriving from many directions, near and far; no particular sound is dominant. attenuation: The decrease in level of sound, usually from absorption, divergence, scattering, or the cancellation of the sound waves. average sound level (Leq): The level of a steady sound which, in a stated time period and at a stated location, has the same A‐weighted sound energy as the time‐varying sound. Unit: decibel. A‐weighted sound level (LA): The sound level measured with a sound‐level meter using A‐ weighting. Unit: decibel (dBA). background noise: The total noise from all sources other than a particular sound that is of interest other than the noise being measured or other than the speech or music being listened to). decibel (dB): A unit of level which denotes the ratio between two quantities that are proportional to power; the number of decibels correspond to the logarithm (to the base 10) of this ratio. [In many sound fields, the sound pressure ratios are not proportional to the corresponding power ratios, but it is common practice to extend the use of the decibel to such cases. One decibel equals one‐tenth of a bel.] equivalent continuous sound level (average sound level) (Leq): The level of a steady sound which, in a stated time period and at a stated location, has the same A‐weighted sound energy as the time‐varying sound. Unit: decibel (dBA). ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment iv December 2010 frequency Of a periodic function, the number of times that a quantity repeats itself in one second, i.e., the number of cycles per second. Unit: hertz (Hz). noise: Any disagreeable or undesired sound, i.e., unwanted sound. noise level: Same as sound level. Usually used to describe the sound level of an unwanted sound. noise reduction (NR): The difference in sound pressure level between any two points along a path of sound propagation. sound: A change in air pressure that is capable of being detected by the human ear. The hearing sensation excited by a change in air pressure. sound level: Ten times the logarithm to the base 10 of the square of the ratio of the frequency‐ weighted (and time‐averaged) sound pressure to the reference sound pressure of 20 micropascals. The frequency‐weightings and time‐weighting employed should be specified; if they are not specified, it is understood that A‐frequency‐weighting is used and that an averaging time of 0.125 is used. Unit: decibel (dBA). ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment v December 2010 SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ACRONYMS ADT Average Daily Traffic ANSI American National Standards Institute AM Ante Meridiem CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level dB decibel dBA A‐weighted decibel FHWA Federal Highway Administration INCE Institute of Noise Control Engineering Ldn average day/night sound level Leq equivalent sound level Lmax maximum noise level Lmin minimum noise level Ln exceedance level MPH miles per hour PM Post Meridiem RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 1 December 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this Acoustical Assessment is to evaluate potential short‐ and long‐term noise impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements project (project). The project site is located in the City of Anaheim (City), California, at the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, west of the State Route 57 (SR‐57) and Ball Road interchange. The proposed project consists of improvements to the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street to increase the capacity of the intersection. Four build Alternatives have been analyzed to increase the capacity of the intersection. This analysis focuses on Alternative 1 which represents the “worst case” scenario. Alternative 1 includes the widening of Ball Road to the City of Anaheim’s standard cross section for a six‐lane Primary Arterial. The proposed cross section includes 10‐foot wide sidewalks, 13‐foot wide outside lanes, 11‐foot wide through lanes, 11‐foot wide left‐turn lanes, a raised landscaped median of various widths, and a retaining curb at the back of the sidewalk adjacent to the proposed right‐turn lane. Alternative 1 would require the maximum width of all of the studied alternatives. This alternative would require a substantial amount of right‐of‐way acquisition (approximately 9,120 square feet) of 10 adjacent parcels. A total of 32 parking stalls would be displaced from three adjacent parcels in the northeast quadrant of the intersection. These parking stalls would be replaced by 33 proposed parking stalls located within the eastern portion of the property. Additionally, a masonry block wall (approximately 5.5 feet in height) would be required to be reconstructed at the southwest corner of the intersection. Minor widening at the southbound SR‐57 on‐ramp would also occur. Temporary Impacts. Based upon the results of the analysis, construction activities would be perceptible at nearby sensitive receptors. However, the City’s Municipal Code exempts construction activities during permitted hours. Also, implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would further reduce short‐term noise impacts. Temporary noise impacts would be less than significant. Long‐Term Impacts. The analysis has concluded that project implementation would result in less than significant long‐term impacts in regard to mobile and stationary sources. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 2 December 2010 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY The purpose of this Acoustical Assessment is to evaluate potential short‐ and long‐term noise impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement project (project) in the City of Anaheim (City). 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The project is located in the City of Anaheim, California; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity. Specifically, the project site is located at the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, west of the State Route 57 (SR‐57) and Ball Road interchange; refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map. 1.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project consists of improvements to the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street to increase the capacity of the intersection. Four build Alternatives have been analyzed to increase the capacity of the intersection. This analysis focuses on Alternative 1 which represents the “worst case” scenario. Alternative 1 includes the widening of Ball Road to the City of Anaheim’s standard cross section for a six‐lane Primary Arterial. The proposed cross section includes 10‐foot wide sidewalks, 13‐foot wide outside lanes, 11‐foot wide through lanes, 11‐foot wide left‐turn lanes, a raised landscaped median of various widths, and a retaining curb at the back of the sidewalk adjacent to the proposed right‐turn lane. Alternative 1 would require the maximum width of all of the studied alternatives. This alternative would require a substantial amount of right‐of‐way acquisition (approximately 9,120 square feet) of 10 adjacent parcels. A total of 32 parking stalls would be displaced from three adjacent parcels in the northeast quadrant of the intersection. These parking stalls would be replaced by 33 proposed parking stalls located within the eastern portion of the property. Additionally, a masonry block wall (approximately 5.5 feet in height) would be required to be reconstructed at the southwest corner of the intersection. Minor widening at the southbound SR‐57 on‐ramp would also occur. The proposed improvements along Sunkist Street are the same in each alternative. In order to accommodate the additional left turn lane, the section includes 10‐foot wide sidewalks, 13‐foot wide outside lanes, 11‐foot wide through lanes, and 11‐foot wide left turn lanes. The overall right‐of‐way width would be 90 feet and would not require acquisition from adjacent parcels; refer to Exhibit 3, Site Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- ACOUSTICAL ASSESSMENT BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Exhibit 1 Regional Vicinity NOT TO SCALE 11/10 • JN 10-107037 S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y S A N D I E G O C O U N T Y Victorville Adelanto Hesperia Apple Valley San Bernardino Riverside Fontana Ontario Pomona Rancho Cucamonga Chino Diamond Bar Rialto Corona Norco Lake Elsinore Hemet Beaumont Redlands Temecula Fallbrook Oceanside Murrieta L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y Palmdale Lancaster San Fernando Pasadena West Covina Whittier Burbank Glendora Los Angeles Torrance Long Beach Newport Beach Huntington Beach San Clemente Dana Point Laguna Beach San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Garden Grove Fullerton Yorba Linda Irvine P A C I F I C O C E A N 101 395 Moreno Valley Sun City Perris 405 405 605 105 210 210 710 110 215 215 5 5 5 15 15 15 10 10 10 73 55 57 91 91 90 60 71 91 60 22 1 2 14 18 138 247 74 74 1 ANAHEIM - Project Site ---PAGE BREAK--- ACOUSTICAL ASSESSMENT BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Exhibit 2 Local Vicinity 11/10 • JN 10-107037 NOT TO SCALE - Project Boundary ---PAGE BREAK--- ACOUSTICAL ASSESSMENT BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Exhibit 3 Site Plan 11/10 • JN 10-107037 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 6 December 2010 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF NOISE METRICS 2.1 STANDARD UNIT OF MEASUREMENT Sound is described in terms of the loudness (amplitude) of the sound and frequency (pitch) of the sound. The standard unit of measurement of the loudness of sound is the decibel (dB). Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency‐ dependent rating scale has been devised to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A‐weighted decibel scale (dBA) performs this compensation by differentiating among frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. Decibels are based on the logarithmic scale. The logarithmic scale compresses the wide range in sound pressure levels to a more usable range of numbers in a manner similar to the Richter scale used to measure earthquakes. In terms of human response to noise, a sound 10 dBA higher than another is perceived to be twice as loud and 20 dBA higher is perceived to be four times as loud, and so forth. Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Examples of various sound levels in different environments are illustrated on Exhibit 4, Sound Levels and Human Response. Many methods have been developed for evaluating community noise to account for, among other things: • The variation of noise levels over time; • The influence of periodic individual loud events; and • The community response to changes in the community noise environment. Table 1, Noise Descriptors, provides a listing of methods to measure sound over a period of time. 2.2 HEALTH EFFECTS OF NOISE Human response to sound is highly individualized. Annoyance is the most common issue regarding community noise. The percentage of people claiming to be annoyed by noise generally increases with the environmental sound level. However, many factors also influence people’s response to noise. The factors can include the character of the noise, the variability of the sound level, the presence of tones or impulses, and the time of day of the occurrence. Additionally, non‐acoustical factors, such as the person’s opinion of the noise source, the ability to adapt to the noise, the attitude towards the source and those associated with it, and the predictability of the noise, all influence people’s response. As such, response to noise varies widely from one person to another and with any particular noise, individual responses would range from “not annoyed” to “highly annoyed.” ---PAGE BREAK--- ACOUSTICAL ASSESSMENT BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Exhibit 4 Sound Levels and Human Response 11/10 • JN 10-107037 Source: Melville C. Branch and R. Dale Beland, Outdoor Noise in the Metropolitan Environment, 1970. Environmental Protection Agency, Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety (EPA/ONAC 550/9-74-004), March 1974. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 8 December 2010 Table 1 Noise Descriptors Term Definition Decibel (dB) The unit for measuring the volume of sound equal to 10 times the logarithm (base 10) of the ratio of the pressure of a measured sound to a reference pressure (20 micropascals). A-Weighted Decibel (dBA) A sound measurement scale that adjusts the pressure of individual frequencies according to human sensitivities. The scale accounts for the fact that the region of highest sensitivity for the human ear is between 2,000 and 4,000 cycles per second (hertz). Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) The sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given time period. The Leq is the value that expresses the time averaged total energy of a fluctuating sound level. Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) The highest individual sound level (dBA) occurring over a given time period. Minimum Sound Level (Lmin) The lowest individual sound level (dBA) occurring over a given time period. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) A rating of community noise exposure to all sources of sound that differentiates between daytime, evening, and nighttime noise exposure. These adjustments are +5 dBA for the evening, 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM, and +10 dBA for the night, 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM. Day/Night Average (Ldn) The Ldn is a measure of the 24-hour average noise level at a given location. It was adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for developing criteria for the evaluation of community noise exposure. It is based on a measure of the average noise level over a given time period called the Leq. The Ldn is calculated by averaging the Leq’s for each hour of the day at a given location after penalizing the “sleeping hours” (defined as 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM) by 10 dBA to account for the increased sensitivity of people to noises that occur at night. Exceedance Level (Ln) The A-weighted noise levels that are exceeded 10%, 50%, and 90% (L01, L10, L50, L90, respectively) of the time during the measurement period. Source: Cyril M. Harris, Handbook of Noise Control, 1979. When the noise level of an activity rises above 70 dBA, the chance of receiving a complaint is possible, and as the noise level rises, dissatisfaction among the public steadily increases. However, an individual’s reaction to a particular noise depends on many factors, such as the source of the sound, its loudness relative to the background noise, and the time of day. The reaction to noise can also be highly subjective; the perceived effect of a particular noise can vary widely among individuals in a community. The effects of noise are often only transitory, but adverse effects can be cumulative with prolonged or repeated exposure. The effects of noise on the community can be organized into six broad categories: • Noise‐Induced Hearing Loss; • Interference with Communication; • Effects of Noise on Sleep; • Effects on Performance and Behavior; ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 9 December 2010 • Extra‐Auditory Health Effects; and • Annoyance. Although it often causes discomfort and sometimes pain, noise‐induced hearing loss usually takes years to develop. Noise‐induced hearing loss can impair the quality of life through a reduction in the ability to hear important sounds and to communicate with family and friends. Hearing loss is one of the most obvious and easily quantified effects of excessive exposure to noise. While the loss may be temporary at first, it could become permanent after continued exposure. When combined with hearing loss associated with aging, the amount of hearing loss directly caused by the environment is difficult to quantify. Although the major cause of noise‐ induced hearing loss is occupational, substantial damage can be caused by non‐occupational sources. According to the United States Public Health Service, nearly ten million of the estimated 21 million Americans with hearing impairments owe their losses to noise exposure. Noise can mask important sounds and disrupt communication between individuals in a variety of settings. This process can cause anything from a slight irritation to a serious safety hazard, depending on the circumstance. Noise can disrupt face‐to‐face communication and telephone communication, and the enjoyment of music and television in the home. It can also disrupt effective communication between teachers and pupils in schools, and can cause fatigue and vocal strain in those who need to communicate in spite of the noise. Interference with communication has proved to be one of the most important components of noise‐related annoyance. Noise‐induced sleep interference is one of the critical components of community annoyance. Sound level, frequency distribution, duration, repetition, and variability can make it difficult to fall asleep and may cause momentary shifts in the natural sleep pattern, or level of sleep. It can produce short‐term adverse effects on mood changes and job performance, with the possibility of more serious effects on health if it continues over long periods. Noise can cause adverse effects on task performance and behavior at work, and non‐ occupational and social settings. These effects are the subject of some controversy, since the presence and degree of effects depends on a variety of intervening variables. Most research in this area has focused mainly on occupational settings, where noise levels must be sufficiently high and the task sufficiently complex for effects on performance to occur. Recent research indicates that more moderate noise levels can produce disruptive after‐effects, commonly manifested as a reduced tolerance for frustration, increased anxiety, decreased incidence of “helping” behavior, and increased incidence of “hostile” behavior. Noise has been implicated in the development or exacerbation of a variety of health problems, ranging from hypertension to As with other categories, quantifying these effects is difficult due to the amount of variables that need to be considered in each situation. As a biological stressor, noise can influence the entire physiological system. Most effects seem to be transitory, but with continued exposure some effects have been shown to be chronic in laboratory animals. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 10 December 2010 Annoyance can be viewed as the expression of negative feelings resulting from interference with activities, as well as the disruption of one’s peace of mind and the enjoyment of one’s environment. Field evaluations of community annoyance are useful for predicting the consequences of planned actions involving highways, airports, road traffic, railroads, or other noise sources. The consequences of noise‐induced annoyance are privately held dissatisfaction, publicly expressed complaints to authorities, and potential adverse health effects, as discussed above. In a study conducted by the United States Department of Transportation, the effects of annoyance to the community were quantified. In areas where noise levels were consistently above 60 dBA CNEL, approximately nine percent of the community is highly annoyed. When levels exceed 65 dBA CNEL, that percentage rises to 15 percent. Although evidence for the various effects of noise have differing levels of certainty, it is clear that noise can affect human health. Most of the effects are, to a varying degree, stress related. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 11 December 2010 3.0 LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, AND STANDARDS Land uses deemed sensitive by the State of California (State) include schools, hospitals, rest homes, and long‐term care and mental care facilities. Many jurisdictions also consider residential uses particularly noise‐sensitive because families and individuals expect to use time in the home for rest and relaxation, and noise can interfere with those activities. Some jurisdictions may also identify other noise‐sensitive uses such as churches, libraries, and parks. Land uses that are relatively insensitive to noise include office, commercial, and retail developments. There is a range of insensitive noise receptors that include uses that generate significant noise levels and that typically have a low level of human occupancy. This noise analysis was conducted in accordance with Federal, State, and local criteria described in the following sections. 3.1 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) offers guidelines for community noise exposure in the publication Noise Effects Handbook – A Desk Reference to Health and Welfare Effects of Noise. These guidelines consider occupational noise exposure as well as noise exposure in homes. The EPA recognizes an exterior noise level of 55 decibels day‐night level (dB Ldn) as a general goal to protect the public from hearing loss, activity interference, sleep disturbance, and annoyance. The EPA and other Federal agencies have adopted suggested land use compatibility guidelines that indicate that residential noise exposures of 55 to 65 dB Ldn are acceptable. However, the EPA notes that these levels are not regulatory goals, but are levels defined by a negotiated scientific consensus, without concern for economic and technological feasibility or the needs and desires of any particular community. 3.2 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was enacted in 1970 and requires that all known environmental effects of a project be analyzed, including environmental noise impacts. Under CEQA, a project has a potentially significant impact if the project exposes people to noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. Additionally, under CEQA, a project has a potentially significant impact if the project creates a substantial increase in the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. If a project has a potentially significant impact, mitigation measures must be considered. If mitigation measures to reduce the impact to less than significant are not feasible due to economic, social, environmental, legal, or other conditions, the most feasible mitigation measures must be considered. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 12 December 2010 3.3 LOCAL JURISDICTION City of Anaheim General Plan The City of Anaheim General Plan (General Plan) adopted May 2004, outlines the goals and policies for noise control within the City. Table 2, Noise Sensitivity of Land Uses, presents the noise standards contained in the Noise Element of the General Plan. The criteria are designed to control unnecessary, excessive, and annoying sounds from stationary sources at the private property line such as generators, air conditioning equipment, and other mechanical equipment. These standards include maximum permissible noise levels for noise sources not operating on a public right‐of‐way. The Federal government specifically pre‐empts local control of noise emissions from aircraft, railroads, and interstate highways. However, local agencies may regulate noise levels of most other sources, may provide standards for insulation of noise receivers (either within the structure or by placement of noise barriers such as walls), and, through land use decisions, may reduce noise impacts by separating noise generators from noise‐sensitive uses. Table 2 Noise Sensitivity of Land Uses Land Use CENEL (dBA) Categories Uses Interior1 Exterior2 Single and multiple-family, duplex 453 65 Residential Mobile homes - 654 Hotel, motel, transient housing 45 - Commercial retail, bank, restaurant 55 - Office building, research and development, professional offices 50 - Amphitheater, concert hall, auditorium, movie theater 45 - Gymnasium (multipurpose) 50 - Sports club 55 - Manufacturing, warehousing, wholesale, utilities 65 - Commercial Movie theaters 45 - Hospital, school classrooms/playgrounds 45 65 Institutional/Public Church, library 45 - Open Space Parks - 65 Notes: 1: Indoor environment excluding: bathrooms, kitchens, toilets, closets, and corridors 2: Outdoor environment limited to: • Private yard of single-family dwellings • Multiple-family private patios or balconies accessed from within the dwelling (Balconies six feet deep or less are exempt) • Mobile hom parks • Park picnic areas • School playgrounds • Hospital patios 3: Noise level requirement with closed windows, mechanical ventilation or other means of natural ventilation shall be provided as per Chapter 12, Section 1205 of the Uniform Building Code. 4: Exterior noise levels should be such that interior noise levels will not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level. Source: City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim General Plan Noise Element, Figure N-2, May 2004, Page N-7. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 13 December 2010 City of Anaheim Municipal Code The City has adopted Chapter 18.40.090 of the City’s Municipal Code, Sound Attenuation for Residential Development, to regulate and control disturbing, excessive, and offensive noise. Stationary noise associated with the operation of any facility within the project area is considered significant if it would make, cause, or be allowed to produce noise, which is received on property occupied by another person within the designated zone, in excess of an exterior sound level of 65 dBA. Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code states that the sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of the chapter between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 14 December 2010 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 NOISE MEASUREMENTS In order to quantify existing ambient noise levels in the project area, RBF Consulting conducted three noise measurements on November 10, 2010; refer to Table 3, Noise Measurements. The noise measurement sites were representative of typical existing noise exposure adjacent to the project site. Ten‐minute measurements were taken at each site during the day. Meteorological conditions were typical, with light wind speeds, low humidity, and clear to partly cloudy skies. Measured noise levels during the daytime measurements ranged from 46.1 dBA to 59.6 dBA. Noise monitoring equipment used for the ambient noise survey consisted of a Brüel & Kjær Hand‐held Analyzer Type 2250 equipped with a Type 4189 pre‐polarized microphone. The monitoring equipment complies with applicable requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Type I (precision) sound level meters. The results of the field measurements are included in Appendix A, Noise Measurement Sheets. Refer to Exhibit 5, Noise Measurement Locations for the noise measurements sites. Table 3 Noise Measurements Noise Level (dBA) Site Location Time Leq Lmin Lmax Peak 1 Residential uses located at Hilda Street and Laramie Street 1:47 p.m. 55.3 50.7 69.7 86.9 2 Residential uses located at the terminus of Sunburst Way 2:18 p.m. 62.2 52.2 73.6 98.1 3 Residential uses located along Carl Street, between Riles Circle and Omega Avenue 2:41 p.m. 56.2 49.4 70.5 96.6 Source: RBF Consulting, Field Visit, November 10, 2010. 4.2 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS Certain land uses are particularly sensitive to noise, including schools, hospitals, rest homes, long‐term medical and mental care facilities, and parks and recreation areas. Residential areas are also considered noise sensitive, especially during the nighttime hours. Existing sensitive receptors located in the project vicinity include residential uses, schools, hospitals, and places of worship. Sensitive receptors are outlined in Table 4, Sensitive Receptors. ---PAGE BREAK--- ACOUSTICAL ASSESSMENT BALL ROAD/SUNKIST STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Exhibit 5 Noise Measurement Locations 11/10 • JN 10-107037 NOT TO SCALE - Project Boundary - Noise Monitoring Location ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 16 December 2010 Table 4 Sensitive Receptors Type Name Distance from Project Site (feet) Direction from Project Site 19 North 6 East 13 South Residential Residential Uses 8 West James M Guinn Elementary School 482 North Katella High School 866 Northwest Anaheim University 1,425 West Schools Westwood College of Technology 2,680 South Boysen Park 3,055 Northwest Parks Juarez Park 2,450 North Stadium Vineyard Church 2,320 South Anaheim Christian Center 2,550 Southwest Anaheim United Methodist Church 2,900 Northwest Places of Worship Calvary Baptist Church 2,900 Northeast Hospitals Universal Hospital 2,550 Southwest Source: Google Earth 2010. 4.3 EXISTING NOISE LEVELS In order to assess the potential for mobile source noise impacts, it is necessary to determine the noise currently generated by vehicles traveling through the project area. Noise models were run using the Federal Highway Administration’s Highway Noise Prediction Model (FHWA‐ RD‐77‐108) together with several roadway and site parameters; please refer to Appendix B, Modeling Data. These parameters determine the projected impact of vehicular traffic noise and include the roadway cross‐section number of lanes), roadway width, average daily traffic (ADT), vehicle travel speed, percentages of auto and truck traffic, roadway grade, angle‐of‐ view, and site conditions (“hard” or “soft”). The model does not account for ambient noise levels noise from adjacent land uses) or topographical differences between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Noise projections are based on modeled vehicular traffic as derived from the Project Study Report – Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements, prepared by RBF Consulting on September 23, 2010. The posted speed limit on Ball Road is 40 miles per hour (mph). The speed limit on Sunkist Street is 40 mph south of Ball Road, and 35 mph north of Ball Road. Existing modeled traffic noise levels are presented in Table 5, Existing Traffic Noise Levels. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 17 December 2010 Table 5 Existing Traffic Noise Levels Distance from Roadway Centerline to: (Feet) Roadway Segment ADT dBA @ 100 Feet from Roadway Centerline 60 CNEL Noise Contour 65 CNEL Noise Contour 70 CNEL Noise Contour Ball Road East of Sunkist Street 35,500 68.4 832 263 83 West of Sunkist Street 26,490 67.2 621 196 62 Sunkist Street North of Ball Road 20,280 65.0 350 111 35 South of Ball Road 13,530 64.3 317 100 32 ADT = average daily trips; dBA = A-weighted decibels; CNEL = community noise equivalent level Source: RBF Consulting, Project Study Report – Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements, September 23, 2010. The primary sources of stationary noise in the project vicinity are those associated with residential uses. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 18 December 2010 5.0 POTENTIAL ACOUSTICAL IMPACTS CEQA THRESHOLDS Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines contains analysis guidelines related to the assessment of noise impacts. These guidelines have been utilized as thresholds of significance for this analysis. As stated in Appendix G, a project would create a significant environmental impact if it would: • Expose persons to, or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies (refer to Impact Statements NOI‐1); • Expose persons to or generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels (refer to Impact Statement NOI‐2); • Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project (refer to Impact Statement NOI‐1); • Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project (refer to Impact Statement NOI‐ • For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels (refer to Impact Statement NOI‐3); and • For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels (refer to Impact Statement NOI‐3). Based on these standards and thresholds, the effects of the proposed project have been categorized as either a “less than significant impact” or a “potentially significant impact.” Mitigation measures are recommended for potentially significant impacts. NOI‐1 • EXPOSE PERSONS TO, OR GENERATE NOISE LEVELS IN EXCESS OF STANDARDS ESTABLISHED IN THE LOCAL GENERAL PLAN OR NOISE ORDINANCE, OR APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF OTHER AGENCIES? • A SUBSTANTIAL PERMANENT INCREASE IN AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN THE PROJECT VICINITY ABOVE LEVELS EXISTING WITHOUT THE PROJECT? ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 19 December 2010 • A SUBSTANTIAL TEMPORARY OR PERIODIC INCREASE IN AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN THE PROJECT VICINITY ABOVE LEVELS EXISTING WITHOUT THE PROJECT? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. SHORT‐TERM CONSTRUCTION Construction activities are generally temporary and short in duration, resulting in periodic increases in the ambient noise environment. Construction activities are anticipated to take place over approximately six months in 2012, and would consist of site preparation and grading, trenching, paving, and building construction. Groundborne noise and other types of construction‐related noise impacts would typically occur during the initial site preparation, which can create the highest levels of noise. However, site preparation typically has the shortest duration of all construction phases. Activities that occur during this phase include demolition, earthmoving, and soils compaction. High groundborne noise levels and other miscellaneous noise levels can be created during this phase due to the operation of heavy‐duty trucks, backhoes, and front‐end loaders. The anticipated short‐term construction noise levels generated during grading, trenching, paving, and building construction activities are presented in Table 6, Construction Noise Levels. Construction noise levels were quantified using the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA‐HEP‐05‐054). The distance is measured from the nearest sensitive receptor to the closest construction activity area of the Project site. Table 6 Construction Noise Levels Receptor Locations Description Direction1 Distance2 Estimated Exterior Construction Noise Level3,4 Estimated Interior Construction Noise Level3,4 North 19 94.1 74.1 East 6 104.1 84.1 South 13 97.4 77.4 Demolition West 8 101.6 81.6 North 19 94.2 74.2 East 6 104.2 84.2 South 13 97.5 77.5 Grading West 8 101.7 81.7 North 19 92.4 72.4 East 6 102.4 82.4 South 13 95.7 75.7 Trenching West 8 99.9 79.9 North 19 92.2 72.2 East 6 102.2 82.2 South 13 95.5 75.5 Paving West 8 99.7 77.7 North 19 94.6 74.6 East 6 104.6 84.6 South 13 97.9 77.9 Building Construction West 8 102.1 82.1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 20 December 2010 Notes: 1. Uses to the north, east, south, and west of the project are residential. 2. Distance is from the nearest sensitive receptor to the closest construction activity area of the Project site. 3. Derived from the Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), dated January 2006. Refer to Appendix B. 4. A typical building can reduce noise levels by 20 dBA with the windows closed.1 This assumes all windows and doors are closed, thereby attenuating the exterior noise levels by 20 dBA. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA – HEP – 05-054), January 2006; refer to Appendix B. To summarize, construction activities would expose adjacent receptors to interior noise levels of: • 74.1 dBA to 84.1 dBA during the demolition phase; • 74.2 dBA to 84.2 dBA during the grading phase; • 72.4 dBA to 82.4 dBA during the trenching phase; • 72.2 dBA to 82.2 dBA during the paving phase; and • 74.6 dBA to 84.6 dBA during the building construction phase. Actual construction‐related noise activities would be lower than these conservative rates and would cease upon completion of construction. Furthermore, construction would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated or confined in the area directly adjacent to the residential uses to the north, east, south, and west. Pursuant to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, construction activities may occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. This exemption is included in the code in recognition that construction activities undertaken during daytime hours are a typical part of living in an urban environment and does not cause a significant disruption. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI‐1 would further minimize impacts from construction noise. Also, nighttime construction would not occur. Thus, a less than significant noise impact would result from construction activities. LONG‐TERM OPERATIONS Project implementation would result in additional traffic on adjacent roadways, thereby increasing vehicular generated noise in the vicinity of the existing residential uses. Traffic volumes were analyzed for the 2030 traffic volumes along the approach and departure segments associated with the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection. According to Table 7, 2030 Traffic Noise Levels, noise levels at a distance of 100 feet from the centerline would range from 69.8 dBA to 68.7 dBA. The highest noise level for 2030 traffic volumes would occur along Ball Road, east of Sunkist Street. Traffic noise levels would be higher with the 2030 traffic volumes as compared to existing conditions. However, the traffic noise level increase would not be attributed to the proposed project, as the project consists of intersection improvements and does not include any new land uses that could generate new traffic trips. 1 United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, The Noise Guidebook, undated, page 14. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 21 December 2010 The proposed project would result in an additional left‐turn lane in each direction along Sunkist Street, a third westbound lane along Ball Road, and a westbound right‐turn lane along Ball Road. These additional lanes would require the widening of the roadways and intersection, which would move travel lanes approximately five feet closer to sensitive (residential) uses as compared to existing conditions. Moving the proposed travel lane approximately five feet closer to sensitive uses is not anticipated to result in a perceptible increase in noise levels experienced at the adjacent residential uses. It is also noted that the existing second story of the adjacent residential uses are currently not attenuated by the approximately 5.5‐foot concrete block wall located along the intersection. Additionally, as seen in Table 3, noise measurements conducted on November 10, 2010, concluded that noise levels experienced within the adjacent residential uses are lower than those predicted by the traffic noise level modeling. Therefore, it is anticipated that noise levels experienced within the adjacent residential uses would also be lower than the traffic noise levels presented in Table 7. Thus, the widening of the intersection and roadways would not substantially increase the ambient noise level in the project area. Table 7 2030 Traffic Noise Levels Distance from Roadway Centerline to: (Feet) Roadway Segment ADT dBA @ 100 Feet from Roadway Centerline 60 CNEL Noise Contour 65 CNEL Noise Contour 70 CNEL Noise Contour Ball Road East of Sunkist Street 50,400 69.8 832 263 83 West of Sunkist Street 37,800 68.7 621 196 62 Sunkist Street North of Ball Road 24,900 65.8 350 111 35 South of Ball Road 24,300 66.8 317 100 32 ADT = average daily trips; dBA = A-weighted decibels; CNEL = community noise equivalent level Source: RBF Consulting, Project Study Report – Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements, September 23, 2010. The majority of existing soundwalls along the edges of Ball Road and Sunkist Street would not be disturbed. However, Alternative 1 may require the removal of the existing block wall (approximately 5.5 feet in height) at the southwest corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection near multi‐family residential uses. Should the removal of this block wall be required, Mitigation Measure NOI‐2 would require the wall to be replaced with one of similar material and equal or higher height to the existing wall to ensure noise levels are not adversely increased. As traffic noise levels experienced by adjacent sensitive uses are not anticipated to substantially increase as a result of the proposed project, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: NOI‐1 Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Contractor shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department that the project complies with the following: ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 22 December 2010 • Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices. • Property occupants located adjacent to the project boundary shall be sent a notice, at least 15 days prior to commencement of construction of each phase, regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet shall also be posted at the project construction site. All notices and signs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department prior to mailing or posting and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. • The Contractor shall provide, to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, a qualified “Noise Disturbance Coordinator.” The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within 24‐hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Public Works Department. All notices that are sent to residential units immediately surrounding the construction site and all signs posted at the construction site shall include the contact name and the telephone number for the Disturbance Coordinator. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses residences, convalescent homes, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Pursuant to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, construction activities shall occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. NOI‐2 Should the proposed project require the removal of the existing block wall at the southwest corner of the Ball Road/Sunkist Street intersection near the multi‐family residential uses, the City of Anaheim shall replace the wall with one of equal or greater height and material to the existing wall. NOI‐2 EXPOSURE OF PERSONS TO OR GENERATION OF EXCESSIVE GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION OR GROUNDBORNE NOISE LEVELS? Less Than Significant Impact. Project construction can generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration, depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 23 December 2010 buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that damage structures. The types of construction vibration impact include human annoyance and building damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of human perception for extended periods of time. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between vibration source and receiver. In addition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. The vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table 8, Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment. Table 8 Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment Approximate peak particle velocity at 25 feet (inches/second) Approximate peak particle velocity at 75 feet (inches/second) Large bulldozer 0.089 0.017 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.015 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.001 Notes: 1 - Peak particle ground velocity measured at 25 feet unless noted otherwise. 2 - Root mean square amplitude ground velocity in decibels (VdB) referenced to 1 micro-inch/second. Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006. Groundborne vibration decreases rapidly with distance. As indicated in Table 8, based on the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) data, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment operation that would be used during project construction range from 0.003 to 0.089 inch‐per‐second peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet from the source of activity. At 75 feet from the source activity, vibration velocities range from 0.001 to 0.017 inch‐per‐second peak PPV. With regard to the proposed project, groundborne vibration would be generated primarily during site clearing and grading activities on‐site and by off‐site haul‐truck travel. Although the closest occupied structures are located within 25 feet of the project site, the proposed construction activities would not be capable of exceeding the 0.2 inch‐per‐second PPV significance threshold for vibration. Therefore, vibration impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 24 December 2010 NOI‐3 • FOR A PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN AN AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN (LOS ALAMITOS ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER OR FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT), WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS? • FOR A PROJECT WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A PRIVATE AIRSTRIP, HELIPORT OR HELISTOP, WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan. There is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within the City boundaries or within two miles of the project site. However, the North Net Fire Training Heliport is located approximately 1.5 miles south of the project site. The proposed project would not increase operations of the heliport and would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels, as the project involves the widening of an intersection. Therefore, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvement Project Acoustical Assessment 25 December 2010 6.0 REFERENCES 6.1 LIST OF PREPARERS RBF CONSULTING 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 95618 949/472‐3505 Eddie Torres, INCE, REA, Director of Technical Studies Kelly Chiene, Environmental Analyst Linda Bo, Word Processor/Graphics 6.2 DOCUMENTS 1. City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim General Plan, August 1999. 2. City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim Municipal Code, codified through Ordinance 6192, passed November 9, 2010. 3. Harris, Cyril, Handbook of Noise Control, 1979. 4. RBF Consulting, Project Study Report – Ball Road/Sunkist Street Intersection Improvements, September 23, 2010. 5. State of California, Governors Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines, October 2003. 6. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, The Noise Guidebook, undated. 7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Noise Effects Handbook – A Desk Reference to Health and Welfare Effects of Noise, October 1979 (revised July 1981). 6.3 SOFTWARE/WEBSITES 1. FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA‐RD‐77‐108, Initial release date of December 1978. 2. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX ---PAGE BREAK--- A. NOISE MEASUREMENT SHEETS ---PAGE BREAK--- Site Number: SB001 Recorded By: Kelly Chiene Job Number: 10-107037 Date: 11/10/10 Time: 1:47 p.m. Location: Residential uses; Hilda Street and Laramie Street Source of Peak Noise: Landscaping; traffic on Sunkist Street, Ball Road, SR-57, and 3 cars on Hilda Street/Laramie Street Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 55.3 50.7 69.7 86.9 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 2548189 11/14/2007 Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 2543364 11/15/2007 Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 4265 7/18/2006 Sound Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 7/31/2006 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: ☼ Partly Cloudy Note: dBA Offset = -0.03 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) Est. 0.8 66.6 1007.2 Photo of Measurement Location ---PAGE BREAK--- 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 2.0.2 Start Time: 11/10/2010 14:47:10 End Time: 11/10/2010 14:57:10 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 140.16 Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: 2543364 Input: Top Socket Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Diffuse-field Calibration Time: 11/10/2010 10:25:08 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 54.65 mV/Pa SB001 Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin time time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 0.00 55.3 69.7 50.7 Time 02:47:10 PM 02:57:10 PM 0:10:00 Date 11/10/2010 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=55.3 dB LFmax=69.7 dB LFmin=50.7 dB SB001 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 dB 11/10/2010 02:47:10 PM - 02:57:10 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB001 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 02:47:10 PM - 02:57:10 PM dB L1 = 62.2 dB L5 = 58.7 dB L10 = 56.9 dB L50 = 54.3 dB L90 = 52.6 dB L95 = 52.1 dB L99 = 51.5 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 02:52:09 PM - 02:52:10 PM LAIeq=55.1 dB LAFmax=55.0 dB LCpeak=76.7 dB LAFmin=53.7 dB SB001 02:48:00 PM 02:50:00 PM 02:52:00 PM 02:54:00 PM 02:56:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin SB001 Start Elapsed LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 55.1 55.0 53.7 Time 02:52:09 PM 0:00:01 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=54.6 dB LFmax=55.0 dB LFmin=53.7 dB SB001 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 11/10/2010 02:52:09 PM - 02:52:10 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB001 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 02:52:09 PM - 02:52:10 PM dB L1 = 55.0 dB L5 = 54.9 dB L10 = 54.8 dB L50 = 54.5 dB L90 = 54.2 dB L95 = 54.1 dB L99 = 53.7 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 02:47:10 PM - 03:47:10 PM LAIeq=56.5 dB LAFmax=69.7 dB LCpeak=86.9 dB LAFmin=50.7 dB SB001 Periodic reports 02:50:00 PM 03:00:00 PM 03:10:00 PM 03:20:00 PM 03:30:00 PM 03:40:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin SB001 Periodic reports Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 0.00 56.5 69.7 50.7 Time 02:47:10 PM 0:10:00 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=55.3 dB LFmax=69.7 dB LFmin=50.7 dB SB001 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 11/10/2010 02:47:10 PM - 02:57:10 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB001 Periodic reports 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 02:47:10 PM - 02:57:10 PM dB L1 = 62.2 dB L5 = 58.7 dB L10 = 56.9 dB L50 = 54.3 dB L90 = 52.6 dB L95 = 52.1 dB L99 = 51.5 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 02:52:09 PM.900 - 02:52:10 PM.000 LAeq=54.4 dB LAF =54.5 dB SB001 - Fast Logged 02:48:00 PM 02:50:00 PM 02:52:00 PM 02:54:00 PM 02:56:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAeq LAF SB001 - Fast Logged Start Elapsed LAeq time time [dB] Value 54.4 Time 02:52:09 PM.900 0:00:00.100 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Site Number: SB002 Recorded By: Kelly Chiene Job Number: 10-107037 Date: 11/10/10 Time: 2:18 p.m. Location: Residential uses; Sunburst Way Source of Peak Noise: Traffic on Ball Road; helicopter Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 62.2 52.2 73.6 98.1 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 2548189 11/14/2007 Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 2543364 11/15/2007 Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 4265 7/18/2006 Sound Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 7/31/2006 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: ☼ Partly Cloudy Note: dBA Offset = -0.03 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) Est. 0.9 68 1007.3 Photo of Measurement Location ---PAGE BREAK--- 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 2.0.2 Start Time: 11/10/2010 15:18:40 End Time: 11/10/2010 15:28:40 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 140.16 Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: 2543364 Input: Top Socket Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Diffuse-field Calibration Time: 11/10/2010 10:25:08 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 54.65 mV/Pa SB002 Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin time time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 0.00 62.2 73.6 52.2 Time 03:18:40 PM 03:28:40 PM 0:10:00 Date 11/10/2010 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=62.2 dB LFmax=73.6 dB LFmin=52.2 dB SB002 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 dB 11/10/2010 03:18:40 PM - 03:28:40 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB002 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 03:18:40 PM - 03:28:40 PM dB L1 = 70.4 dB L5 = 67.8 dB L10 = 65.4 dB L50 = 60.0 dB L90 = 55.4 dB L95 = 54.8 dB L99 = 53.4 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 03:23:39 PM - 03:23:40 PM LAIeq=61.6 dB LAFmax=62.1 dB LCpeak=86.2 dB LAFmin=60.3 dB SB002 03:19:00 PM 03:21:00 PM 03:23:00 PM 03:25:00 PM 03:27:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin SB002 Start Elapsed LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 61.6 62.1 60.3 Time 03:23:39 PM 0:00:01 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=61.0 dB LFmax=62.1 dB LFmin=60.3 dB SB002 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 11/10/2010 03:23:39 PM - 03:23:40 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB002 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 03:23:39 PM - 03:23:40 PM dB L1 = 62.2 dB L5 = 62.1 dB L10 = 62.0 dB L50 = 61.0 dB L90 = 60.4 dB L95 = 60.3 dB L99 = 60.2 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 03:18:40 PM - 04:18:40 PM LAIeq=63.4 dB LAFmax=73.6 dB LCpeak=98.1 dB LAFmin=52.2 dB SB002 Periodic reports 03:20:00 PM 03:30:00 PM 03:40:00 PM 03:50:00 PM 04:00:00 PM 04:10:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin SB002 Periodic reports Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 0.00 63.4 73.6 52.2 Time 03:18:40 PM 0:10:00 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=62.2 dB LFmax=73.6 dB LFmin=52.2 dB SB002 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 11/10/2010 03:18:40 PM - 03:28:40 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB002 Periodic reports 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 03:18:40 PM - 03:28:40 PM dB L1 = 70.4 dB L5 = 67.8 dB L10 = 65.4 dB L50 = 60.0 dB L90 = 55.4 dB L95 = 54.8 dB L99 = 53.4 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 03:23:39 PM.900 - 03:23:40 PM.000 LAeq=60.4 dB LAF =60.4 dB SB002 - Fast Logged 03:19:00 PM 03:21:00 PM 03:23:00 PM 03:25:00 PM 03:27:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAeq LAF SB002 - Fast Logged Start Elapsed LAeq time time [dB] Value 60.4 Time 03:23:39 PM.900 0:00:00.100 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Site Number: SB003 Recorded By: Kelly Chiene Job Number: 10-107037 Date: 11/10/10 Time: 2:41 p.m. Location: Residential uses; Carl Street, between Riles Circle and Omega Avenue Source of Peak Noise: Traffic on Ball Road; helicopter Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 56.2 49.4 70.5 96.6 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Brüel & Kjær 2250 2548189 11/14/2007 Microphone Brüel & Kjær 4189 2543364 11/15/2007 Preamp Brüel & Kjær ZC 0032 4265 7/18/2006 Sound Calibrator Brüel & Kjær 4231 2545667 7/31/2006 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: ☼ Partly Cloudy Note: dBA Offset = -0.03 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) Est. 1.1 67.8 1007.4 Photo of Measurement Location ---PAGE BREAK--- 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 2.0.2 Start Time: 11/10/2010 15:41:52 End Time: 11/10/2010 15:51:52 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 140.16 Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: 2543364 Input: Top Socket Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Diffuse-field Calibration Time: 11/10/2010 10:25:08 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 54.65 mV/Pa SB003 Start End Elapsed Overload LAeq LAFmax LAFmin time time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 0.00 56.2 70.5 49.4 Time 03:41:52 PM 03:51:52 PM 0:10:00 Date 11/10/2010 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=56.2 dB LFmax=70.5 dB LFmin=49.4 dB SB003 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 dB 11/10/2010 03:41:52 PM - 03:51:52 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB003 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 03:41:52 PM - 03:51:52 PM dB L1 = 65.0 dB L5 = 61.0 dB L10 = 58.7 dB L50 = 54.0 dB L90 = 51.9 dB L95 = 51.2 dB L99 = 50.5 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 03:46:51 PM - 03:46:52 PM LAIeq=64.3 dB LAFmax=59.8 dB LCpeak=73.2 dB LAFmin=53.1 dB SB003 03:42:00 PM 03:44:00 PM 03:46:00 PM 03:48:00 PM 03:50:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin SB003 Start Elapsed LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 64.3 59.8 53.1 Time 03:46:51 PM 0:00:01 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=53.6 dB LFmax=59.8 dB LFmin=53.1 dB SB003 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 11/10/2010 03:46:51 PM - 03:46:52 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB003 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 03:46:51 PM - 03:46:52 PM dB L1 = 59.6 dB L5 = 58.6 dB L10 = 57.7 dB L50 = 53.8 dB L90 = 53.3 dB L95 = 53.3 dB L99 = 53.2 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 03:41:52 PM - 04:41:52 PM LAIeq=58.6 dB LAFmax=70.5 dB LCpeak=96.6 dB LAFmin=49.4 dB SB003 Periodic reports 03:50:00 PM 04:00:00 PM 04:10:00 PM 04:20:00 PM 04:30:00 PM 04:40:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAIeq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin SB003 Periodic reports Start Elapsed Overload LAIeq LAFmax LAFmin time time [dB] [dB] [dB] Value 0.00 58.6 70.5 49.4 Time 03:41:52 PM 0:10:00 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: Leq=56.2 dB LFmax=70.5 dB LFmin=49.4 dB SB003 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 [PHONE REDACTED] 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 dB 11/10/2010 03:41:52 PM - 03:51:52 PM Hz LZeq LZFmax LZFmin Cursor: [76.2 ; 76.4[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% SB003 Periodic reports 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 11/10/2010 03:41:52 PM - 03:51:52 PM dB L1 = 65.0 dB L5 = 61.0 dB L10 = 58.7 dB L50 = 54.0 dB L90 = 51.9 dB L95 = 51.2 dB L99 = 50.5 dB Level Cumulative ---PAGE BREAK--- Cursor: 11/10/2010 03:46:51 PM.900 - 03:46:52 PM.000 LAeq=53.0 dB LAF =53.1 dB SB003 - Fast Logged 03:42:00 PM 03:44:00 PM 03:46:00 PM 03:48:00 PM 03:50:00 PM 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sound dB LAeq LAF SB003 - Fast Logged Start Elapsed LAeq time time [dB] Value 53.0 Time 03:46:51 PM.900 0:00:00.100 Date 11/10/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- B. MODELING DATA ---PAGE BREAK--- Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.0 Report date: 11/19/2010 Case DescripDemolition Receptor #1 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night North Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Tractor No 40 84 19 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 19 0 Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 19 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 19 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Tractor 92.4 88.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 87.5 83.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Saw 98 91 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 90.1 86.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 98 94.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #2 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night East Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Tractor No 40 84 6 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 6 0 Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 6 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 6 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Tractor 102.4 98.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 97.5 93.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Saw 108 101 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 100.1 96.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Receptor #3 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night South Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Tractor No 40 84 13 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 13 0 Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 13 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 13 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Tractor 95.7 91.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 90.8 86.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Saw 101.3 94.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 93.4 89.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #4 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night West Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Tractor No 40 84 8 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 8 0 Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 8 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 8 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Tractor 99.9 95.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 95 91 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Saw 105.5 98.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 97.6 93.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 105.5 101.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.0 Report date: 11/19/2010 Case DescripGrading Receptor #1 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night North Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Grader No 40 85 19 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 19 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 19 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HNo 50 85 19 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 93.4 89.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 87.5 83.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 90.1 86.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 H 93.4 90.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 93.4 94.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #2 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night East Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Grader No 40 85 6 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 6 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 6 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HNo 50 85 6 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 103.4 99.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 97.5 93.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 100.1 96.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 H 103.4 100.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 103.4 104.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Receptor #3 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night South Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Grader No 40 85 13 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 13 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 13 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HNo 50 85 13 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 96.7 92.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 90.8 86.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 93.4 89.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 H 96.7 93.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 96.7 97.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #4 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night West Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Grader No 40 85 8 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 8 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 8 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HNo 50 85 8 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 100.9 96.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 95 91 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 97.6 93.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 H 100.9 97.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 100.9 101.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.0 Report date: 11/19/2010 Case Descript Trenching Receptor #1 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night North Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Excavator No 40 80.7 19 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 19 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85 19 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Excavator 89.1 85.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 89.1 85.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 93.4 90.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 93.4 92.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #2 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night East Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Excavator No 40 80.7 6 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 6 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85 6 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Excavator 99.1 95.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 99.1 95.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 103.4 100.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 103.4 102.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Receptor #3 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night South Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Excavator No 40 80.7 13 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 13 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85 13 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Excavator 92.4 88.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 92.4 88.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 96.7 93.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 96.7 95.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Receptor #4 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night West Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Excavator No 40 80.7 8 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 8 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85 8 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Excavator 96.6 92.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 96.6 92.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 100.9 97.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 100.9 99.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.0 Report date: 11/19/2010 Case DescripPaving Receptor #1 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night North Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 19 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 19 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 19 0 Paver No 50 77.2 19 0 Roller No 20 80 19 0 Tractor No 40 84 19 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Mixer Truck 87.2 83.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 87.2 83.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 87.2 83.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 85.6 82.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 88.4 81.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 92.4 88.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 92.4 92.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #2 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night East Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 6 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 6 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 6 0 Paver No 50 77.2 6 0 Roller No 20 80 6 0 Tractor No 40 84 6 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Mixer Truck 97.2 93.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 97.2 93.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 97.2 93.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 95.6 92.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 98.4 91.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 102.4 98.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 102.4 102.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Receptor #3 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night South Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 13 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 13 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 13 0 Paver No 50 77.2 13 0 Roller No 20 80 13 0 Tractor No 40 84 13 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Mixer Truck 90.5 86.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 90.5 86.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 90.5 86.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 88.9 85.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 91.7 84.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 95.7 91.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 95.7 95.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Receptor #4 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night West Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 8 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 8 0 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 8 0 Paver No 50 77.2 8 0 Roller No 20 80 8 0 Tractor No 40 84 8 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Mixer Truck 94.7 90.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 94.7 90.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 94.7 90.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 93.1 90.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 95.9 88.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 99.9 95.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 99.9 99.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.0 Report date: 11/19/2010 Case DescripBuilding Receptor #1 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night North Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 19 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 19 0 Tractor No 40 84 19 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq All Other Equipment > 5 HP 93.4 90.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 93.4 90.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 92.4 88.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 93.4 94.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #2 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night East Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 6 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 6 0 Tractor No 40 84 6 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq All Other Equipment > 5 HP 103.4 100.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 103.4 100.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 102.4 98.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 103.4 104.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Receptor #3 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night South Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 13 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 13 0 Tractor No 40 84 13 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq All Other Equipment > 5 HP 96.7 93.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 96.7 93.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 95.7 91.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 96.7 97.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Receptor #4 Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night West Residential 1 1 1 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 8 0 All Other Equipment > 5 HPNo 50 85 8 0 Tractor No 40 84 8 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq All Other Equipment > 5 HP 100.9 97.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 100.9 97.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 99.9 95.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 100.9 102.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 35500 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3550 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 44 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 56.9 65.6 63.9 57.8 66.4 67.0 Medium Trucks: 65.8 57.7 51.4 49.8 58.3 58.5 Heavy Trucks: 70.7 58.7 49.7 50.9 60.6 60.7 Vehicle Noise: 73.0 67.2 64.3 59.4 67.9 68.4 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -832 832 -569 569 -263 263 -180 180 -83 83 -83 83 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene PROJECT DATA Existing 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: East of Sunkist Street Ball Road Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -1000 -500 0 500 1000 Roadway Centerline Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 26490 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2649 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 40 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 55.7 64.4 62.6 56.6 65.2 65.8 Medium Trucks: 64.6 56.5 50.2 48.6 57.1 57.3 Heavy Trucks: 69.5 57.5 48.5 49.7 59.4 59.5 Vehicle Noise: 71.8 66.0 63.1 58.1 66.7 67.2 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -621 621 -425 425 -196 196 -134 134 -62 62 -62 62 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA Existing 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: West of Sunkist Street Ball Road Analyst: Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 Roadway Centerline Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 20280 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2028 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 35 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 24 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 53.1 61.9 60.1 54.0 62.6 63.3 Medium Trucks: 62.8 54.7 48.4 46.8 55.3 55.5 Heavy Trucks: 68.0 56.1 47.0 48.3 58.2 58.3 Vehicle Noise: 70.5 63.8 60.6 56.0 64.5 65.0 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -350 350 -239 239 -111 111 -76 76 -35 35 -35 35 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene PROJECT DATA Existing 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: North of Ball Road Sunkist Street Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 Roadway Centerline Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 13530 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 1353 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 36 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 52.8 61.6 59.8 53.7 62.4 63.0 Medium Trucks: 61.8 53.7 47.3 45.7 54.2 54.5 Heavy Trucks: 66.6 54.7 45.6 46.8 56.5 56.7 Vehicle Noise: 69.0 63.2 60.2 55.3 63.9 64.3 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -317 317 -217 217 -100 100 -68 68 -32 32 -32 32 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene PROJECT DATA Existing 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: North of Ball Road Sunkist Street Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 Roadway Centerline Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 50400 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 5040 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 50 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 58.3 67.1 65.3 59.2 67.9 68.5 Medium Trucks: 67.3 59.2 52.8 51.2 59.7 59.9 Heavy Trucks: 72.1 60.2 51.1 52.3 62.0 62.2 Vehicle Noise: 74.5 68.7 65.7 60.8 69.4 69.8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -1181 1181 -807 807 -373 373 -255 255 -118 118 -118 118 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA Future 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: East of Sunkist Street Ball Road Analyst: Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 Roadway Centerline Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 37800 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 3780 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 45 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 57.1 65.9 64.1 58.0 66.7 67.3 Medium Trucks: 66.1 58.0 51.6 50.1 58.5 58.8 Heavy Trucks: 70.9 59.0 49.9 51.1 60.9 61.0 Vehicle Noise: 73.3 67.5 64.6 59.6 68.2 68.7 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -887 887 -606 606 -280 280 -192 192 -89 89 -89 89 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene PROJECT DATA Future 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: West of Sunkist Street Ball Road Analyst: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -1000 -500 0 500 1000 Roadway Centerline Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 24900 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2490 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 35 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 29 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 53.9 62.7 60.9 54.8 63.5 64.1 Medium Trucks: 63.6 55.5 49.2 47.6 56.1 56.3 Heavy Trucks: 68.8 56.9 47.8 49.1 59.0 59.1 Vehicle Noise: 71.3 64.6 61.4 56.8 65.3 65.8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -429 429 -293 293 -136 136 -93 93 -43 43 -43 43 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA Future 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: North of Ball Road Sunkist Street Analyst: Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 Roadway Centerline Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Name: Scenario: Job Roadway: Centerline Dist to Barrier 0 Road Grade: 0 Barrier (0=wall, 1= berm): 0 Average Daily Traffic: 24300 Receiver Barrier Dist: 0 Peak Hour Traffic: 2430 Centerline Dist. To Observer: 100 Vehicle Speed: 40 Barrier Near Lane CL Dist: 0 Centerline Separation: 41 Barrier Far lane CL Dist: 0 Pad Elevation: 0.5 Site conditions HARD SITE Road Elevation: 0 Observer Height (above grade): 0 Type Day Evening Night Daily Barrier Height: 0 Auto 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 Rt View: 90 Lft View: -90 Med. Truck 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 Heavy Truck 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074 Autos: 0 Medium Trucks: 2.3 Heavy Trucks: 8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 55.3 64.0 62.3 56.2 64.8 65.4 Medium Trucks: 64.2 56.1 49.8 48.2 56.7 56.9 Heavy Trucks: 69.1 57.1 48.1 49.3 59.0 59.1 Vehicle Noise: 71.4 65.6 62.7 57.8 66.3 66.8 Vehicle Type Peak Leq Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: -570 570 -390 390 -180 180 -123 123 -57 57 -57 57 UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (No topographic or barrier attenuation) MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS (With topographic or barrier attenuation) NOISE INPUTS FLEET MIX NOISE SOURCE ELEVATIONS (Feet) PROJECT DATA Future 10-107037 SITE DATA Road Segment: North of Ball Road Sunkist Street Analyst: Federal Highway Administration RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model (CALVENO) Ball Rd/Sunkist St Intersection Improvements Kelly Chiene CENTERLINE NOISE CONTOUR Mitigated 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Unmitigated Roadway Centerline Noise Contour -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 Roadway Centerline Feet