Document Anaheim_doc_7b7539ba83

5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-165 5.10 5.10 NOISE 5.10.1 Methodology The evaluation of noise impacts associated with a proposed project includes: • Reviewing existing ambient noise levels, including modeling and field monitoring in the project area; • Determining the noise impacts associated with the development of the General Plan and Zoning Code update; • Determining the long-term noise impacts on proposed development within the proposed General Plan area; and, • Determining the long-term noise impacts from project-related traffic. The generation of noise associated with the implementation of the General Plan and Zoning Code update would occur in the short-term with site preparation and construction activities and over the long- term from transportation related noise sources on new and existing development. This noise assessment addresses noise impacts by discussing the current noise environment, analyzing impacts associated with proposed land uses including mobile-source noise, evaluating construction equipment noise and identifying mitigation measures and their effectiveness. The Caltrans Sound32 version of the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, currently used throughout the United States, is used to evaluate traffic-related noise conditions in the project area. This model requires various parameters, including traffic volumes, vehicle mix, vehicle speed and roadway geometry, to compute typical equivalent noise levels during daytime, evening and nighttime hours. The resultant noise levels are weighted and summed over 24-hour periods to determine the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) values. CNEL contours are derived through a series of calculations to determine the 60, 65 and 70 dBA CNEL contours associated with traffic noise generated on area roads. These data are used in the assessment of impacts in this DEIR. A full description of the noise modeling methodology can be found in Appendix D, Noise Data. Characteristics of Sound Sound is a pressure wave transmitted through the air. It is described in terms of loudness or amplitude (measured in decibels), frequency or pitch (measured in Hertz [Hz] or cycles per second), and duration (measured in seconds or minutes). The standard unit of measurement of the loudness of sound is the decibel (dB). Changes of 1 to 3 dBA are detectable under quiet, controlled conditions and changes of less than 1 dBA are usually indiscernible. A change of 5 dBA is readily discernable to most people in an exterior environment whereas a 10 dBA change is perceived as a doubling (or halving) of the sound. The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies. Sound waves below 16 Hz are not heard at all and are "felt" more as a vibration. Similarly, while people with extremely sensitive hearing can hear sounds as high as 20,000 Hz, most people cannot hear above 15,000 Hz. In all cases, hearing acuity falls off rapidly above about 10,000 Hz and below about 200 Hz. Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency dependent rating scale is usually used to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) performs this compensation by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. Noise is defined as unwanted sound, and is known to have several adverse effects on people, including hearing loss, speech and sleep interference, physiological responses, and annoyance. Based on these known adverse effects of noise, the Federal government, the State of California, and many local ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-166 • The Planning Center May 2004 governments have established criteria to protect public health and safety and to prevent disruption of certain human activities. Measurement of Sound Sound intensity is measured through the A-weighted measure to correct for the relative frequency response of the human ear. That is, an A-weighted noise level de-emphasizes low and very high frequencies of sound similar to the human ear's de-emphasis of these frequencies. Unlike linear units such as inches or pounds, decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale, representing points on a sharply rising curve. On a logarithmic scale, an increase of 10 decibels is 10 times more intense than 1 decibel, while 20 decibels are 100 times more intense, and 30 decibels are 1,000 times more intense. A sound as soft as human breathing is about 10 times greater than 0 decibel. The decibel system of measuring sound gives a rough connection between the physical intensity of sound and its perceived loudness to the human ear. Ambient sounds generally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Sound levels are generated from a source and their decibel level decreases as the distance from that source increases. Sound dissipates exponentially with distance from the noise source. This phenomenon is known as “spreading loss.” For a single point source, sound levels decrease by approximately 6 decibels for each doubling of distance from the source. This drop-off rate is appropriate for noise generated by on-site operations from stationary equipment or activity at a project site. If noise is produced by a line source, such as highway traffic, the sound decreases by 3 decibels for each doubling of distance in a hard site environment. Line source noise in a relatively flat environment with absorptive vegetation decreases by 4.5 decibels for each doubling of distance. This latter value is also used in the calculation of railroad noise. Time variation in noise exposure is typically expressed in terms of a steady-state energy level equal to the energy content of the time varying period (called Leq), or alternately, as a statistical description of the sound level that is exceeded over some fraction of a given observation period. For example, the L50 noise level represents the noise level that is exceeded 50% of the time. Half the time the noise level exceeds this level and half the time the noise level is less than this level. This level is also representative of the level that is exceeded 30 minutes in an hour. Similarly, the L02, L08 and L25 values represent the noise levels that are exceeded 2, 8 and 25% of the time or 1, 5 and 15 minutes per hour. These values are typically used to demonstrate compliance for stationary noise sources with a city’s noise ordinance, as discussed below. Other values typically noted during a noise survey are the Lmin and Lmax. These values represent the minimum and maximum root-mean-square noise levels obtained over the measurement period. Because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at night, State law and the City of Anaheim require that, for planning purposes, an artificial dB increment be added to quiet time noise levels in a 24-hour noise descriptor called the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) or Day-Night Noise Level (Ldn). The CNEL descriptor requires that an artificial increment of 5 dBA be added to the actual noise level for the hours from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 10 dBA for the hours from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The Ldn descriptor uses the same methodology except that there is no artificial increment added to the hours between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. Both descriptors give roughly the same 24-hour level with the CNEL being only more restrictive higher). The City's General Plan and Zoning Code update identifies the use of the CNEL for environmental assessment. However, the General Plan and Zoning Code update also allows for a 12-hour Leq for sensitive land uses that are not occupied on a continual basis. This descriptor is actually more appropriate to those uses ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-167 schools, churches) that are not typically occupied at night when noise levels are weighted to compensate for relaxation and sleep. and Physiological Effects of Noise Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to noise levels higher than 85 dBA. Exposure to high noise levels affects our entire system, with prolonged noise exposure in excess of 75 dBA increasing body tensions, and thereby affecting blood pressure, functions of the heart and the nervous system. In comparison, extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA could result in permanent cell damage. When the noise level reaches 120 dBA, a tickling sensation occurs in the human ear even with short-term exposure. This level of noise is called the threshold of feeling. As the sound reaches 140 dBA, the tickling sensation is replaced by the feeling of pain in the ear. This is called the threshold of pain. A sound level of 190 dBA will rupture the eardrum and permanently damage the inner ear. Vibration Fundamentals Vibration is a trembling, quivering, or oscillating motion of the earth. Like noise, vibration is transmitted in waves, but in this case through the earth or solid objects. Unlike noise, vibration is typically of a frequency that is felt rather than heard. Vibration can be either natural as in the form of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides, etc., or man-made as from explosions, the action of heavy machinery or heavy vehicles such as trains. Both natural and man-made vibration may be continuous such as from operating machinery, or transient as from an explosion. As with noise, vibration can be described by both its amplitude and frequency. Amplitude may be characterized in three ways including displacement, velocity and acceleration. Particle displacement is a measure of the distance that a vibrated particle travels from its original position and for the purposes of soil displacement is typically measured in inches or millimeters. Particle velocity is the rate of speed at which soil particles move in inches per second or millimeters per second. Particle acceleration is the rate of change in velocity with respect to time and is measured in inches per second or millimeters per second. Typically, particle velocity (measured in inches or millimeters per second) and/or acceleration (measured in gravities) are used to describe vibration. Table 5.10-1 presents the human reaction to various levels of peak particle velocity. Vibrations also vary in frequency and this affects perception. Typical construction vibrations fall in the 10 to 30 Hz range and usually occur around 15 Hz. Traffic vibrations exhibit a similar range of frequencies. However, due to their suspension systems, buses often generate frequencies around 3 Hz at high vehicle speeds. It is more uncommon, but possible, to measure traffic frequencies above 30 Hz. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-168 • The Planning Center May 2004 TABLE 5.10-1 HUMAN REACTION TO TYPICAL VIBRATION LEVELS Vibration Level Peak Particle Velocity (inches/second) Human Reaction Effect on Buildings 0.006 - 0.019 Threshold of perception, possibility of intrusion Vibrations unlikely to cause damage of any type 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible Recommended upper level of vibration to which ruins and ancient monuments should be subjected 0.10 Level at which continuous vibration begins to annoy people Virtually no risk of “architectural” not structural) damage to normal buildings 0.20 Vibrations annoying to people in buildings Threshold at which there is a risk to “architectural” damage to normal dwelling – houses with plastered walls and ceilings 0.4 - 0.6 Vibrations considered unpleasant by people subjected to continuous vibrations and unacceptable to some people walking on bridges Vibrations at a greater level than normally expected from traffic, but would cause “architectural” damage and possibly minor structural damage Source: Caltrans 2002. The way in which vibration is transmitted through the earth is called propagation. Propagation of earthborn vibrations is complicated and difficult to predict because of the endless variations in the soil through which waves travel. There are three main types of vibration propagation: surface, compression and shear waves. Surface waves, or Rayleigh waves, travel along the ground’s surface. These waves carry most of their energy along an expanding circular wave front, similar to ripples produced by throwing a rock into a pool of water. P-waves, or compression waves, are body waves that carry their energy along an expanding spherical wave front. The particle motion in these waves is longitudinal in a “push-pull” fashion). P-waves are analogous to airborne sound waves. S-waves, or shear waves, are also body waves that carry energy along an expanding spherical wave front. However, unlike P- waves, the particle motion is transverse or “side-to-side and perpendicular to the direction of propagation.” As vibration waves propagate from a source, the energy is spread over an ever-increasing area such that the energy level striking a given point is reduced with the distance from the energy source. This geometric spreading loss is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Wave energy is also reduced with distance as a result of material damping in the form of internal friction, soil layering, and void spaces. The amount of attenuation provides by material damping varies with soil type and condition as well as the frequency of the wave. 5.10.2 Environmental Setting Existing Noise Environment Like all highly urbanized areas, the City of Anaheim is subject to noise from a myriad of sources. The major source of noise is from mobile sources and most specifically, traffic traveling through the City on its various roadways and freeways. Aircraft also contribute to this noise. The City is not located within the 65 dBA CNEL contours for any commercial or private airports, and fixed-wing aircraft are typically too high to add measurably to local noise. However, local helicopter air traffic is commonplace throughout the City and was noted in many instances during the field survey preformed in drafting the General Plan Noise Element. In addition, both freight and commuter rail-traffic pass through the City and noise ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-169 generated along these rail lines can be substantially higher than in areas that are located away from the tracks. Noise from trains and their associated horns and whistles are a particular concern to those residents that live along these railroad corridors. The City also includes a variety of stationary noise sources. These are primarily associated with industrial land uses and for the most part are restricted to the appropriate areas. However, in some areas along Orangethorpe Avenue and in central portions of the City) residential land uses abut industrial land uses and the sound of industrial processes is readily audible at exterior residential locations. Other sources of “stationary” noise are associated with the fireworks displays put on at Disneyland on a regular basis and special events at Angel Stadium of Anaheim. While the latter sources of noise are readily audible at proximate residential locations, they represent the existing setting. Furthermore, this noise is of short duration and as such, does not add substantially to the existing CNEL, which is based on a 24-hour, time-weighted average. Field Survey The City of Anaheim encompasses approximately 54 square miles of Orange County. Most of the City is currently occupied, however, the eastern most portion of the City (primarily east of the Eastern Transportation Corridor (SR-241) remains largely undeveloped. In addition, other areas of the City will likely undergo redevelopment. To ascertain the existing noise within the City and to determine the percentages of automobiles and trucks for subsequent use in the generation of noise contours, The Planning Center conducted field monitoring on Wednesday, September 3 and Thursday, September 4, 2003, in conjunction with the development of the General Plan and Zoning Code update. Eighteen separate noise level measurements were obtained in representative areas of the City. The location of the noise monitoring locations are shown in Figure 5.10-1, Noise Monitoring Locations. Additional details on the monitoring program are thoroughly covered in Appendix D, Noise Data. The field monitoring confirmed that most noise in the City is due to the use of vehicles on public roadways. The City is also subject to noise created by aircraft overflights and helicopters, which were noted during most of the field measurements. Other noise sources include the Union Pacific, the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BN&SF) and Metrolink Railroad operations. Relative to noise generated by on-road vehicles, however, the combined contribution by air and rail operations city-wide is relatively a small percentage of the City’s total noise. On-Road Vehicles Noise from motor vehicles is generated by engine vibrations, the interaction between tires and the road, and the exhaust system. Reducing the average motor vehicle speed reduces the noise exposure of receptors adjacent to the road. Each reduction of 5 miles per hour reduces noise by about 1.3 dBA. In order to assess the potential for mobile-source noise impacts, it is necessary to determine the noise currently generated by vehicles traveling through the project area. Average daily traffic (ADT) volumes were based on the existing daily traffic volumes provided by Parsons Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc. The results of this modeling indicate that average noise levels along arterial segments currently range from approximately 60 dBA to about 75 dBA CNEL as measured at a distance of 50 feet from the centerline of the road. Lesser-traveled routes in areas that are currently underdeveloped are under 55 dBA CNEL, whereas noise levels near the freeways are projected at about 86 dBA CNEL as measured at a distance of 50 feet from the centerline of the road. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-170 • The Planning Center May 2004 This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-172 • The Planning Center May 2004 This page intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-173 Railroad Noise The project area includes two railroad freight carriers. These include the Union Pacific line located primarily along the I-5 Freeway, but diverging in the southern portions of the City, and the BN&SF located along Orangethorpe Avenue/Esperanza Road. The Metrolink line also runs through the City and is located between Anaheim Boulevard and East Street south of La Palma Avenue and Lemon Street and Raymond Avenue north of La Palma. Metrolink also runs along Tustin Avenue, north of the SR-91 Freeway and shares the BN&SF line along Orangethorpe Avenue/Esperanza Road. Railroad noise is dependant on the number of engines and railcars, the average speed, the percentage of operations that take place at night, the type of rails and the presence of “at-grade” crossings that require the engineer to sound a warning horn. An at-grade crossing raises the noise produced by the engines by approximately 10 dBA. Ten times as many operations could occur if a horn were not sounded to achieve the same 10 dBA increase. Parsons Brinckerhoff reports that there are approximately 70 at-grade crossings throughout the City. The use of railroad warning signals is regulated at the Federal level and the City has limited authority to dictate railroad policy in this matter. The Union Pacific line is used primarily to serve the local industries. Conversation with Union Pacific representative John Bromley, Director of Public Affairs, revealed that no mainline operations are conducted through the City. The railroad operates only as a branch line with switching activities to service the local business. Trains are short and operated at slow speed. The daily number of operations, and timing of these operations varies considerably day to day and Mr. Bromley was unable to state what a typical day could include. The BN&SF does operate mainline activities through the northeastern portion of the City, primarily along Orangethorpe Avenue/Esperanza Road. Discussion with Lena Kent, BN&SF Director of Public Affairs, noted that the line averages about 75 operations per day, including Metrolink operations. Metrolink operations account for 31 trains per day. Thus, BN&SF operates approximately 44 trains a day along this corridor. Noise from these operations was modeled using the “Wyle” method as presented in The Noise Guidebook distributed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Modeling predicts that the 65 dBA Ldn noise contour falls at a distance of approximately 370 feet from the centerline of the tracks along the Orangethorpe Avenue/Esperanza Road corridor. This distance is extended to approximately 1,260 feet at crossings where a warning horn is sounded. In actuality, these distances would be considerably shorter as the intervening topography and structures would serve as noise berms and walls. The actual distance to the 65 dBA Ldn can only be determined on a case-by-case basis. (Note that railroad noise is based on the Ldn rather than CNEL descriptor. Because very few railroad operations occur between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. [where the CNEL adds a 5 dBA penalty], both descriptors would yield similar results [within 0.2 dBA]). Metrolink has two stations in the City of Anaheim. The “Anaheim” station is located adjacent to the Angel Stadium of Anaheim south of Katella Avenue. The “Anaheim Canyon” station is located just southwest of the intersection of Tustin Avenue and La Palma Avenue. Metrolink and Amtrak schedules show that the Orange County Line, passing through Anaheim Station currently has 45 operations with 10 occurring at night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 The “91 Line” adds an additional 10 operations, with one at night for a total of 55 operations with 11 at night. Using the Wyle method, the 65 Ldn falls at a distance of approximately 115 feet from the centerline of the rails. This distance is extended to approximately 465 feet at crossings. Again, actual distances to these contours could be shorter where topography or structures block the line of sight to the rails. The “Anaheim Canyon” Station is currently serviced/passed by 22 operations with four occurring at night. These operations are joined by the “91 Line” and receptors located along the Inland Empire- ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-174 • The Planning Center May 2004 Orange County corridor could experience 31 operations a day with eight at night for a total of 53 operations with 12 at night. The distances to the 65 Ldn are modeled at approximately 70 feet and 250 feet at crossings requiring a warning signal. Existing Policies and Regulations To limit population exposure to physically and/or damaging, as well as intrusive noise levels, the Federal government, the State of California, various County governments, and most municipalities in the State have established standards and ordinances to control noise. Federal Regulations Federal Highway Administration Six State Routes traverse the City of Anaheim: SR-91, SR-55, SR-57, SR-241, Beach Boulevard (SR-39), and Imperial Highway (SR-90). In addition, I-5 runs through the City. These routes are subject to Federal funding and as such are under the purview of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The FHWA has developed noise standards that are typically used for Federally funded roadway projects or projects that require either Federal or Caltrans review. These noise standards are based on Leq and L10 values. The FHWA values are the maximum desirable values by land use type and area based on a “trade-off” of what is desirable and what is reasonably feasible. These values recognize that in many cases lower noise exposures would result in greater community benefits. The FHWA design noise levels are included in Table 5.10-2. TABLE 5.10-2 FHWA DESIGN NOISE LEVELS Design Noise Levels 1 Activity Category Leq (dBA) L10 (dBA) Description of Activity Category A 57 (exterior) 60 (exterior) Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. B 67 (exterior) 70 (exterior) Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals. C 72 (exterior) 75 (exterior) Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B, above D Undeveloped lands. E 52 (interior) 55 (interior) Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, and auditoriums. 1 Either Leq or L10 (but not both) design noise levels may be used on a project. Source: FHWA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency In addition to FHWA standards, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified the relationship between noise levels and human response. The EPA has determined that over a 24- ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-175 hour period, a Leq of 70 dBA will result in some hearing loss. Interference with activity and annoyance will not occur if exterior levels are maintained at a Leq of 55 dBA and interior levels at or below 45 dBA. While these levels are relevant for planning and design and useful for informational purposes, they are not land use planning criteria because they do not consider economic cost, technical feasibility, or the needs of the community. The EPA also set 55 dBA Ldn as the basic goal for exterior residential noise intrusion. However, other Federal agencies, in consideration of their own program requirements and goals, as well as difficulty of actually achieving a goal of 55 dBA Ldn, have settled on the 65 dBA Ldn level as their standard. At 65 dBA Ldn, activity interference is kept to a minimum, and annoyance levels are still low. It is also a level that can realistically be achieved. Occupational Health and Safety Administration The Federal government regulates occupational noise exposure common in the workplace through the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) under the EPA. Such limitations would apply to the operation of construction equipment and could also apply to any proposed industrial land uses. Noise exposure of this type is dependent on work conditions and is addressed through a facility’s Health and Safety Plan, as required under OSHA, and is therefore not addressed further in this analysis. US Department of Housing and Urban Development The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has set a goal of 65 dBA Ldn as a desirable maximum exterior standard for residential units developed under HUD funding. (This level is also generally accepted within the State of California.) While HUD does not specify acceptable interior noise levels, standard construction of residential dwellings constructed under Title 24 standards typically provides in excess of 20 dBA of attenuation with the windows closed. Based on this premise, the interior Ldn should not exceed 45 dBA. Railroad Noise Standards The Federal government regulates railroad operations in the United States. Train noise is preempted from direct local control by the Federal Noise Control Act (Public Law 90-411, as amended). Federal regulations do not specify absolute levels of acceptable noise that apply directly to rail noise and compatible land uses along rail lines. The following summarizes the applicable Federal rail noise assessment criteria and guidelines. The EPA is charged with regulating railroad noise under the Noise Control Act. These regulations appear in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 201. While these regulations remain in force, the EPA Office of Noise Abatement and Control was closed in 1982, leaving enforcement of the EPA regulations to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Representatives of the EPA, however, have indicated that states and localities may, at their option, enforce the Federal regulation. Table 5.10-3 summarizes the EPA railroad noise standards that set operating noise standards for railroad equipment and set noise limit standards for new equipment. (Note that these values are in terms of the Lmax greatest root-mean-square value obtained over a measurement period], and can be considerably greater than the Leq time-weighted equivalent sound level] typically used in the measurement of obtrusive noise.) ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-176 • The Planning Center May 2004 TABLE 5.10-3 SUMMARY OF EPA/FRA RAILROAD NOISE STANDARDS Noise Sources Operating Conditions Noise Metric Measured Distance (Feet) Standard (dBA) Stationary Lmax (Slow) 1 100 73 Idle Stationary Lmax (Slow) 100 93 Non-Switcher Locomotives built on or before 12/31/79 Non-Idle Moving Lmax (Fast) 2 100 95 Stationary Lmax (Slow) 100 70 Idle Stationary Lmax (Slow) 100 87 Switcher Locomotives plus Non-Switcher Locomotives built after 12/31/79 Non-Idle Moving Lmax (Fast) 100 90 Speed < 45 mph Lmax (Fast) 100 88 Speed > 45 mph Lmax (Fast) 100 93 Rail Cars Coupling Adj. Avg. Max. 50 92 1 A slow exponential-time-weighting is used. 2 A fast exponential-time-weighting is used. Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency Railroad Noise Emission Standard (40 CFR Part 201) The Federal Rail Administration adopted the EPA railroad noise standards as its noise regulations (CFR 49, Chapter 11, part 210) for the purpose of enforcement. The standards provide specific noise limits for stationary and moving locomotives, moving railroad cars and associated railroad operations in terms of A-weighted sound level at a specified measurement location. These regulations are pre-emptive, and states and local governments cannot set more stringent limits for railroad equipment than required by these Federal regulations. Aircraft Noise Standards The noise field study disclosed that the City is subject to aircraft overflight noise. While most fixed-wing aircraft are too high to be of consequence and the City is not located within the 65 dBA CNEL of any commercial airports, helicopters do regularly over fly the City and generate short-term noise. In fact, eight of the 18 noise readings obtained over a period of two days included helicopter overflight noise. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates the noise from aircraft. The Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 required that the FAA establish a single system for measuring and evaluating noise impacts. The FAA chose the Sound Exposure Level (SEL). The individual values of the SEL for each helicopter takeoff, landing, and flyovers are combined and compared against the community noise levels. The FAA Advisory Circular Number 150-5020-2, entitled “Noise Assessment Guidelines for New Helicopters recommends the use of a cumulative noise measure, the 24-hour equivalent sound level (Leq(24)), so that the relative contributions of the heliport and other sound sources within the community may be compared. The Leq(24) is similar to the Ldn used in assessing the impacts of fixed wing aircraft. The helicopter Leq(24) values are obtained by logarithmically adding the single-event SEL values over a 24-hour period. Public Law 96-193 also directs the FAA to identify land uses which are “normally compatible” with various levels of noise from aircraft operations. Because of the size and complexity of many major hub airports and their operations, FAR Part 150 identifies a large number of land uses and their attendant noise levels. However, since the operations of most heliports and helistops tend to be much simpler and the impacts more restricted in area, Part 150 does not apply to heliports/helistops not located on airport ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-177 property. Instead, the FAA recommends exterior noise criteria for individual heliports based on the types of surrounding land uses. These recommended noise levels are included in Table 5.10-4. The maximum recommended cumulative sound level (Leq(24)) from the operations of helicopters at any new site should not exceed the ambient noise already present in the community at the site of the proposed heliport. In other words, the Leq(24) should not exceed the values recommended in Table 5.10-4, or the locally measured ambient noise level. TABLE 5.10-4 NORMALLY COMPATIBLE COMMUNITY SOUND LEVELS Type of Area Leq(24) Residential Suburban Urban City 57 67 72 Commercial 72 Industrial 77 Source: FAA Advisory Circular Number 150-5020-2, 1983 California State Regulations Figure 5.10-2 on the next page presents a land use compatibility chart for community noise prepared by the California Office of Noise Control. It identifies normally acceptable, conditionally acceptable and clearly unacceptable noise levels for various land uses. A conditionally acceptable designation implies new construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements for each land use is made and needed noise insulation features are incorporated in the design. By comparison, a normally acceptable designation indicates that standard construction can occur with no special noise reduction requirements. County of Orange Noise Standards Three unincorporated areas are located adjacent to or within City boundaries and fall within Anaheim’s Sphere-of-Influence: land north of Orangethorpe Avenue and west of Kellogg Drive; land south of Broadway between Gilbert Street and Brookhurst Street, and land south and east of the Mountain Park Specific Plan area. The County of Orange Noise Standards regulates noise within these lands. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-178 • The Planning Center May 2004 Figure 5.10-2 Land Use Compatibility For Community Noise Environments ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-179 The Noise Element of the County of Orange General Plan has developed noise standards for mobile noise sources. These standards address the impacts of noise from adjacent roadways and John Wayne Airport (JWA). The County specifies outdoor and indoor noise limits for residential uses, places of worship, educational facilities, hospitals, hotels/motels, commercial and other land uses. The noise standard for exterior living areas is 65 dBA CNEL. The County prohibits new residential land uses within the 65 dBA65 dba CNEL contour from any airport or air station. Non-residential noise-sensitive land uses, such as hospitals, rest homes, convalescent hospitals, places of worship and schools, will not be permitted within the 65 dBA CNEL area from any source, unless appropriate mitigation measures are included such that the standards contained in the County of Orange Noise Element and in appropriate State and Federal Codes are met. The standard Conditions of Approval of the County of Orange require that all residential and non- residential noise-sensitive structures be sound attenuated against the combined impact of all present and projected noise from exterior noise sources (including aircraft and highway noise) to meet the interior noise criteria as specified in the Noise Element and Land Use/Noise Compatibility Manual 45 dBA CNEL interior). The goals of the County Noise Element are implemented through the County Codified Ordinance and specifically Division 6 (Noise Control), which is the noise control ordinance adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors (Ordinance No. 2700 on September 19, 1973). The Orange County Noise Ordinance specifies allowable levels for daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise at residential properties. Residential properties are defined as real property used for residential purposes other than motels and hotels. Allowable noise levels under the County Code are included in Table 5.10-5. TABLE 5.10-5 COUNTY OF ORANGE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL Time L50 L25 L08 L02 Lmax 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. 55 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 75 dBA 10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. 50 dBA 55 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Source: Orange County Codified Ordinance, Division 6. The Ordinance also states that if the ambient noise level exceeds any of the noise limit categories above, the allowable level should be increased to the value of the ambient level in the appropriate category. With respect to construction noise, the standard Conditions of Approval require that all construction vehicles or equipment, fixed or mobile, operated within 1,000 feet of a dwelling be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, that all operations comply with Orange County Codified Ordinance Division 6 (Noise Control), and stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas must be located as far as practicable from dwellings. As specified in the Orange County Codified Ordinance Division 6 (Noise Control), construction activities are generally restricted to between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. from Monday through Saturday. No construction activity is permitted on Sundays and Federal holidays. Construction noise during the allowed construction time periods is exempted from the noise level provisions in the noise control ordinance. City of Anaheim Noise Standards The General Plan and Zoning Code update is subject to the General Plan and Noise Ordinance incorporated therein. The City has adopted, as part of the Noise Element, the State of California ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-180 • The Planning Center May 2004 standards as included in Figure 5.10-2. Furthermore, the Noise Element indicates that exterior noise levels at residential locations should not exceed a CNEL of 65 dB while interior levels shall not exceed an annual CNEL of 45 dB in any habitable room. Stationary sources of noise are governed under the local Municipal Code, Chapter 6.70, Sound Pressure Levels. Section 6.70.010 simply states that “No person shall, within the City, create any sound, radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property in excess of sixty decibels (Re 0.0002 Microbar) read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response.” The section goes on to state “Traffic sounds, sound created by emergency activities and sound created by governmental units shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter. Sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter during the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.” 5.10.3 Thresholds of Significance The criteria used to determine the significance of potential noise impacts are taken from City-approved Thresholds of Significance based on the City’s Initial Study and the model Initial Study checklist in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines. The project would typically result in a significant impact on noise if the project would result in: • Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; • Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; • A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; • A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; • For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels; • For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. The applicable noise standards governing the project site are the City of Anaheim Noise Standards. Mobile sources of noise, such as aircraft, truck deliveries, railroad and aircraft operations, are exempt from local ordinance but are still subject to CEQA and would be significant if the project generates a volume of traffic that would result in a substantial increase in mobile source-generated noise or sites sensitive land uses in incompatible noise areas. Noise impacts can be broken down into three categories. The first is “audible” impacts, which refers to increases in noise level that are perceptible to humans. Audible increases in noise levels generally refer to a change of 3 dBA or more since this level has been found to be barely perceptible in exterior environments. A change of 5 dBA is readily audible to most people in an exterior environment. The second category, “potentially audible,” refers to a change in noise level between 1 and 3 dBA. This range of noise levels was found to be noticeable to sensitive people in laboratory environments. The last category includes changes in noise level of less than 1 dBA that are typically “inaudible” to the human ear except under quiet conditions in controlled environments. Only “audible” changes in noise level are considered potentially significant. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-181 Mobile-source noise vehicle noise) is preempted from local regulation, but is still subject to CEQA. Here, a change of 5 dBA would denote a significant impact if their resultant noise level were to remain within the objectives of the General Plan 65 dBA CNEL at a residential location), or 3 dBA if the resultant level were to meet or exceed the objectives of the General Plan. (Note that Caltrans defines a noise increase as substantial when the predicted noise levels with the project would exceed existing noise levels by 12 dBA Leq.) Also note that an impact is only potentially significant if it affects a receptor. An increase in noise in an uninhabited location would not denote a significant impact. 5.10.4 Analysis of Environmental Impacts IMPACT: WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN EXPOSURE OF PERSONS TO OR GENERATION OF NOISE LEVELS IN EXCESS OF STANDARDS ESTABLISHED IN THE LOCAL GENERAL PLAN OR NOISE ORDINANCE, OR APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF OTHER AGENCIES; WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN A SUBSTANTIAL PERMANENT INCREASE IN AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN THE PROJECT VICINITY ABOVE LEVELS EXISTING WITHOUT THE PROJECT; WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN A SUBSTANTIAL TEMPORARY OR PERIODIC INCREASE IN AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN THE PROJECT VICINITY ABOVE LEVELS EXISTING WITHOUT THE PROJECT Impact Analysis: Noise is regulated by numerous codes and ordinances across Federal, State, and local agencies. The City regulates noise-generating activities through the Municipal Code. Specifically, noise generated during construction activities or the operations of aircraft have the potential to violate the City’s Noise Ordinance and policies contained in the General Plan. Construction Noise Impacts The City recognizes that construction noise is difficult to control and restricts allowable hours for this intrusion. Section 6.70.010 of the City Municipal Code states that the sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of the chapter between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Compliance with these provisions is mandatory and as such, does not constitute mitigation under CEQA. Still, construction, even when restricted to within these hours, presents a nuisance value when conducted in proximity to sensitive receptors and the impact is considered as potentially significant. Short-term noise impacts are impacts associated with demolition, site preparation, grading and construction of the proposed land uses. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction. First, the transport of workers and movement of materials to and from the site could incrementally increase noise levels along local access roads. The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated at the job site during demolition, site preparation, grading and/or physical construction. Construction is performed in distinct steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment, and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. However, despite the variety in the type and size of construction equipment, similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction-related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase. Table 5.10-6 lists typical construction equipment noise levels recommended for noise impact assessments as based on a distance of 50 feet between the equipment and a noise receptor. Composite construction noise is best characterized by Bolt, Beranek and Newman (EPA December 31, 1971). In their study, construction noise for commercial and industrial development is presented as 89 dBA Leq when measured at a distance of 50 feet from the construction effort. Residential development is quieter with a composite noise level of about 88 dBA Leq, again when measured at a distance of 50 feet from the construction effort. These values take into account both the number of pieces and ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-182 • The Planning Center May 2004 spacing of the heavy equipment used in the construction effort. In later phases during building assembly, noise levels are typically reduced from these values and the physical structures further break up line-of-sight noise propagation. TABLE 5.10-6 NOISE LEVELS GENERATED BY TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Type of Equipment Range of Sound Levels Measured (dBA at 50 feet) Suggested Sound Levels for Analysis (dBA at 50 feet) Pile Drivers, 12,000 to 18,000 ft-lb/blow 81 to 96 93 Rock Drills 83 to 99 96 Jack Hammers 75 to 85 82 Pneumatic Tools 78 to 88 85 Pumps 68 to 80 77 Dozers 85 to 90 88 Tractor 77 to 82 80 Front-End Loaders 86 to 90 88 Hydraulic Backhoe 81 to 90 86 Hydraulic Excavators 81 to 90 86 Graders 79 to 89 86 Air Compressors 76 to 86 86 Trucks 81 to 87 86 Source: Noise Control for Buildings and Manufacturing Plants,” Bolt, Beranek and Newman, 1987. Based on the 89 dBA Leq value, and assuming that construction were to occur for 8 hours a day, the CNEL is calculated at 84 dBA at 50 feet (83 dBA CNEL for residential construction). The 65 dBA65 dba CNEL contour would fall at a distance of about 446 feet (397 feet for residential construction). Mitigation of these impacts to a level that is less than significant would be conducted both at the project level through the enforcement of the Anaheim Municipal Code and in a broader sense through the policies of the General Plan Noise Element. Operational Impacts On-Road Mobile-Source Noise Impacts on Existing Land Uses Potential impacts on existing land uses stem mainly from the addition of project-generated vehicles along site access roads. Table 5.10-7 presents those routes with the potential for significant increase in noise due to growth anticipated under the General Plan and Zoning Code Update. The table only considers those roads for which the City has existing, 2002 data and as such, all roads subject to potential impact may not be included in the table. The increase or decrease in noise along all routes is included in the Appendix D, Noise Data. As expected, the greatest increases are expected in those areas subject to increased land use intensity. The actual level of impact would depend on the presence and placement of any existing land uses. While an increase of 3 or 5 dBA is potentially significant, it is only significant if it impacts sensitive land uses. While adverse, noise increases in open-space or industrial areas would not be considered as significant. The analysis, as performed, is required under CEQA and essentially assumes that the project would be built at one time and that the entirety of its traffic would be added to the existing volumes of traffic on the road. In actuality, project development would occur over a period of many years and the increase in noise over this period would not be readily discernable. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-183 Furthermore, the General Plan Noise Element contains a number of policies, listed above, to minimize the potential noise sources and impacts generated by vehicular traffic. TABLE 5.10-7 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND RESULTANT NOISE LEVELS ALONG MAJOR ROADWAYS SUBJECT TO POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE Street Name Segment - From Segment – To Existing ADT Volumes Existing CNEL (dBA @ 50 Feet) Future ADT Volumes Future CNEL (dBA @ 50 Feet) Increase in CNEL (dBA @ 50 feet) North to South SR-91 SR-91 (South Side) 26,922 68.6 60,090 72.1 3.5 Harbor Boulevard South Street Ball Road 27,297 68.7 53,999 71.6 3.0 Anaheim Boulevard N. of Cerritos Ave. Cerritos Avenue 26,006 69.9 51,777 72.8 3.0 Manchester Avenue N. of Gene Autry Way 20,200 67.4 50,715 71.4 4.0 Haster Street/Anaheim Blvd. N. of Gene Autry Way Gene Autry Way 20,200 67.4 49,172 71.2 3.9 Katella Avenue Orangewood Ave. 28,177 70.5 63,413 74.0 3.5 State College Boulevard Orangewood Ave. N. of I-5 28,177 70.5 59,472 73.7 3.2 Sunkist Street Ball Road N. of Cerritos Ave. 9,947 64.3 21,406 67.6 3.3 S. of Frontera St. N. of Lincoln Ave. 9,406 65.4 18,907 68.5 3.0 North Rio Vista Street N. of Lincoln Ave. W. Lincoln Ave. 9,406 65.4 18,907 68.5 3.0 Imperial Highway E. La Palma Ave. N. of SR-91 45,000 73.1 89,619 76.1 3.0 West to East Euclid St. W. of West St. 11,720 66.4 28,518 70.3 3.9 W. of West St. West Street 11,720 66.4 25,734 69.8 3.4 West Street Citron Drive 11,720 65.0 25,706 68.4 3.4 Kraemer Blvd. W. of Miller St. 21,100 70.5 52,238 74.5 3.9 W. of Tustin Ave. Tustin Ave. 21,100 70.5 42,906 73.6 3.1 La Palma Avenue Imperial Highway E. of Imperial Highway 14,664 67.4 33,900 71.0 3.6 Lincoln Avenue Lemon Street Anaheim Blvd. 21,827 68.1 39,255 71.9 3.8 Nohl Canyon E. of Nohl Canyon 7,701 64.6 16,797 68.0 3.4 E. of Nohl Canyon W. of Meats 7,701 64.6 15,403 67.6 3.0 Imperial Highway E. of Imperial Highway 16,354 67.8 32,415 70.8 3.0 Nohl Ranch Road Anaheim Hills Rd. Canyon Rim 9,388 65.4 28,057 70.2 4.8 Nohl Ranch Rd. E. of Nohl Ranch Rd. 3,880 61.6 14,263 67.2 5.7 E. of Nohl Ranch Rd. E. of Nohl Ranch Rd.(1) 3,880 61.6 14,529 67.3 5.7 E. of Nohl Ranch Rd.(1) W. of Canyon Rim 3,880 61.6 18,502 68.4 6.8 W. of Canyon Rim Canyon Rim 3,880 61.6 20,992 68.9 7.3 Canyon Rim E. of Canyon Rim 8,315 64.9 20,407 68.8 3.9 E. of Canyon Rim W. of Oak Canyon Dr. 8,315 64.9 23,305 69.4 4.5 W. of Oak Canyon Dr. Oak Canyon Dr. 8,315 64.9 28,994 70.3 5.4 Oak Canyon Dr. W. of Weir Canyon Rd. 8,315 64.9 24,594 69.6 4.7 Serrano Avenue W. of Weir Canyon Rd. Weir Canyon Rd. 8,315 64.9 31,211 70.6 5.7 ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-184 • The Planning Center May 2004 TABLE 5.10-7 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND RESULTANT NOISE LEVELS ALONG MAJOR ROADWAYS SUBJECT TO POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE Street Name Segment - From Segment – To Existing ADT Volumes Existing CNEL (dBA @ 50 Feet) Future ADT Volumes Future CNEL (dBA @ 50 Feet) Increase in CNEL (dBA @ 50 feet) Serrano Ave. W. of Weir Canyon Rd. 1,856 58.4 5,829 63.4 5.0 Oak Canyon Drive W. of Weir Canyon Rd. Weir Canyon Rd. 1,856 58.4 7,372 64.4 6.0 SR-57 (West Side) SR-57 (East Side) 22,820 69.6 53,761 73.3 3.7 SR-57 (East Side) W. of Main Street 22,820 69.6 52,284 73.2 3.6 Ball Road W. of Main Street Main Street 22,820 69.6 46,098 72.6 3.1 Euclid St. Ninth Street 7,944 63.3 16,848 66.6 3.3 Ninth Street W. of Walnut St. 7,944 63.3 18,407 66.9 3.6 W. of Walnut St. Walnut St. 7,944 63.3 19,364 67.2 3.9 State College Blvd. W. of Sunkist St. 8,191 64.8 21,774 69.1 4.2 W. of Sunkist St. Sunkist St. 8,191 64.8 21,127 68.9 4.1 Cerritos Avenue Sunkist St. Douglass Road 8,191 64.8 16,221 67.8 3.0 Harbor Blvd. Clementine St. 5,325 63.0 12,864 66.8 3.8 Disney Way/Freedman Way Clementine Street I-5 (West Side) 5,325 63.0 12,878 66.8 3.8 W. of Walnut St. Walnut St. 25,312 70.0 50,806 73.1 3.0 Walnut St. West Street 25,312 70.0 58,249 73.7 3.6 West Street W. of Harbor Blvd. 28,390 70.5 64,833 74.1 3.6 W. of Harbor Blvd. Harbor Blvd. 28,390 70.5 69,210 74.4 3.9 Harbor Blvd. Clementine Street 31,249 70.9 71,537 74.5 3.6 Clementine Street W. of Haster St. 31,249 70.9 71,741 74.6 3.6 W. of Haster St. Haster Street 31,249 70.9 77,204 74.9 3.9 Haster Street I-5 (East Side) 30,173 70.8 81,410 75.1 4.3 I-5 (East Side) Anaheim Blvd. 30,173 70.8 85,733 75.3 4.5 Anaheim Blvd. Lewis Street 30,173 70.8 85,733 75.3 4.5 Lewis Street E. of Lewis St. 30,173 70.8 78,260 74.9 4.1 E. of Lewis St. W. of State College Blvd. 30,173 70.8 78,260 74.9 4.1 W. of State College Blvd. State College Blvd. 30,173 70.8 76,618 74.8 4.0 State College Blvd. SR-57 (West Side) 35,582 71.5 81,121 75.1 3.6 Katella Avenue SR-57 (West Side) Douglass Road 35,582 71.5 71,402 74.5 3.0 I-5 (East Side) W. of State College Blvd. 17,966 68.2 36,220 71.3 3.0 Orangewood Avenue W. of State College Blvd. State College Blvd. 17,966 68.2 40,542 71.8 3.5 Freeways SR-91 Weir Canyon Rd. 35,000 76.5 77,611 80.0 3.5 ETC 241 (Toll Road) Weir Canyon Rd. S. of Weir Cyn (City Limits) 35,000 76.5 83,387 80.3 3.8 Source: The Planning Center ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-185 On-Road Mobile-Source Noise Impacts on New, Proposed Land Uses An impact could be significant if the project sites sensitive land uses in areas that do not meet the environmental goals of the City for the area in which they are to be situated. The General Plan and Zoning Code Update projected buildout noise contours are presented in Figure 5.10-3 and Figure 5.10- 4. These noise contours include existing plus ambient growth plus project-generated traffic. As noted in the prior discussion, for the purposes of this analysis, impacts on sensitive areas are considered significant if a CNEL of 65 dBA (Leq(12) for sensitive land uses not occupied on a 24-hour basis) is met or exceeded. These standards shall then serve as the basis of the impact analysis. The General Plan and Zoning Code update presents the anticipated buildout vehicle-generated noise contours and proposed land use designations. There are several areas in the City where the 65 dBA CNEL noise contours overlap residential areas. Furthermore, other sensitive land uses, such as schools, churches, etc. uses overlap the 65 dBA CNEL (and possibly Leq(12)) contours generated by on-road vehicles. This is especially true in those areas that lie near the freeways. Any siting of sensitive land uses within these contours then represents a potentially significant impact and would require a separate noise study through the development review process to determine the level of impacts and required mitigation. As such, the General Plan Noise Element contains a number of policies, listed above, to minimize potential impacts on sensitive land uses. Railroad Noise Impacts The project area includes two railroad freight corridors. These include the Union Pacific line located primarily along the I-5 Freeway, but diverging in the southern portions of the City, and the BN&SF located along Orangethorpe Avenue/Esperanza Road. The Metrolink line also runs through the City and is located between Anaheim Boulevard and East Street south of La Palma Avenue and Lemon Street and Raymond Avenue north of La Palma. Metrolink also runs along Tustin Avenue, north of SR-91 and shares the BN&SF line along the Orangethorpe/Esperanza corridor. No data are available from Union Pacific. However, the railroad operates only as a branch line with switching activities to service the local business. Trains are short and operated at slow speed. The daily number of operations, and timing of these operations varies considerably day to day and it is not possible to determine either existing or future railroad noise contours along this line. Furthermore, operations proximate to the I-5 Freeway are masked, at least in part, by freeway noise. As such, any predictions for noise generated along the Union Pacific line or its spurs would be suspect. Still, if these operations increase in direct relation to the BN&SF, discussed below, an increase of approximately 4 dBA Ldn would be expected along the line. The significance of this impact would be dependant on the proximity of any sensitive land uses and is considered as potentially significant. The analysis provided by Parsons Brinckerhoff estimates that traffic along the BN&SF corridor located in the northeastern portion of the City, would increase future operations by approximately 250%. This increase would raise Ldn noise levels by approximately 4 dBA with a resultant noise level of approximately 73 dBA Ldn as measured at a distance of 200 feet from the rails. Many of the existing residents have a direct view of the tracks with no attenuation other than the structures in which they live. This increase in noise then represents a potentially significant impact to existing residents located along the corridor. The presence of at-grade crossings would increase this value to 81 dBA Ldn, again, as measured at a distance of 200 feet. The future 65 dBA65 dba Ldn values would fall at distances of 685 and 2,330 feet, for without and with crossings, respectively. This then represents a potentially significant impact to any sensitive uses located along the Orangethorpe/Esperanza corridor. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-186 • The Planning Center May 2004 Metrolink has two stations in the City as depicted in Figure 5.10-4. The “Anaheim” station is located adjacent to the Angel Stadium of Anaheim south of Katella Avenue. Parsons Brinckerhoff estimates that rail traffic would increase by roughly 160% along the Orange County Line running through the Anaheim station. Existing operations along this line are estimated to create a noise level of 61.5 dB Ldn as measured at a distance of 200 feet from the rail. At-grade crossings would increase this value to approximately 63.5 dBA Ldn, again as measured at a distance of 200 feet. Future operations would raise the noise levels by approximately 2 dBA Ldn. This increase represents an adverse, but less than significant impact on existing receptors. These planned operations would extend the 65 dBA Ldn noise contour to a distance of approximately 160 feet. Grade crossings raise the existing Ldn to approximately 70.5 dBA and future operations could further raise this value by approximately 2 dBA Ldn resulting value of approximately 72.5 dBA Ldn as measured at a distance of 200 feet from the crossing. The 65 dBA Ldn value would be extended to a distance of approximately 630 feet. An impact would be potentially significant if new sensitive land uses were to be located within these distances. Operations at the Anaheim Canyon Station currently produce Ldn values of approximately 58.0 dBA (66.5 dBA at crossings), both as measured at a distance of 200 feet from the rails. Parsons Brinckerhoff estimates an increase of approximately 235% along this line. This increase would raise the noise levels by approximately 3.7 dBA Ldn – a potentially significant increase. The 65 dBA Ldn contours both without and with crossings would be increased to 120 feet and 380 feet, respectively. Again, an impact would be potentially significant if new sensitive land uses were to be located within these distances. As previously noted, in all cases the actual distances could be greatly reduced due to the presence of intervening structures. While most of the proposed land uses sited adjacent to the rail lines would not be sensitive, railroad contours extend far enough to includes large areas of residential development and the impact is potentially significant for noise from passing trains. In an effort to minimize the potential impacts associated with railway operations, the General Plan Noise Element contains a number of policies, listed abovebelowlisted below. Industrial Stationary-Source Noise Impacts The General Plan and Zoning Code update represents a decrease of 13,397,000 square feet of industrial land use from the existing, 2002 value. Such a reduction would have beneficial impacts on noise as industrial facilities can represent point sources of noise located proximate to more sensitive areas. In fact, field reading NR-3 obtained in the field survey noted a continual “hum” from the “Pacific Transformer” facility located approximately 500 feet to the southwest of the multi-family residential complex located along the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue. The location of field reading NR-3 can be seen on Figure 5.10-1 in Environmental Setting section above. Another benefit of reducing industrial land uses is in the reduction of truck (and rail) traffic along major roadways and corridors. Trucks add disproportionately to traffic-generated noise. While a heavy truck may represent two to four passenger car equivalents with respect to roadway geometry, it represents over 30 passenger car equivalents with respect to noise. In addition, the trucks’ taller profiles render sound walls less effective. A volume of automobiles that produces a given noise level is more effectively shielded by a wall than is a mix of automobiles and trucks that produce the same noise level shielded by the same wall. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-188 • The Planning Center May 2004 This page intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-190 • The Planning Center May 2004 This page intentionally left blank ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-192 • The Planning Center May 2004 This page intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-193 While the overall level of industry would decrease in the City, this does not preclude the construction of new industrial facilities or truck terminals within the appropriate designated areas. The siting of new industrial land uses may increase noise levels in their proximity. This can be due to the continual presence of heavy trucks used for the pick-up and delivery of goods and supplies; or from the use of noisy equipment actually used in the manufacturing or machining process. While vehicle noise is exempt from local regulation while operating on public roadways, for the purposes of the planning process, this noise may be regulated as a stationary-source while operating on private property. On February 8, 1996, The Planning Center personnel documented noise associated with idling trucks at the Consolidated Volume Transfer Station and Recycling Facility (CVT) in Anaheim. Equipment used in the CVT study is as described below. The measurement obtained at the CVT Transfer Station was obtained to determine the noise generated by heavy trucks as they queue up and are weighed prior to dumping their loads. Two weigh scales are situated on either side of a scale house at the CVT facility. The meter was placed to the side of the trucks where engine noise is most prominent. The unit was situated at a distance of 50 feet from the side of the near truck. This placed the meter at the opening of a maintenance shop such that the reading was taken between the refuse room and maintenance shop area. (This would tend to produce elevated noise readings as the sound reverberates between the two sets of structures.) A "green waste" processing area was located to the side of the meter at a distance of about 150 feet. "Yard" activities included trucks queuing up (approximately six at a time) and being weighed, and a bucket loader tending to the green wastes. A 15-minute measurement was made beginning at 10:08 a.m. A Leq of 73.0 dBA was registered. Based on the measurement obtained at the CVT facility, this analysis assumes that heavy trucks produce a level of approximately 73 dBA Leq as measured at a distance of 50 feet from the noisiest portion of the truck to the side with the engine exposed). The use of multiple trucks could generate noise levels on the order of 80 dBA Leq; again as measured at a distance of 50 feet. Process equipment and the use of pneumatic tools could also generate elevated noise levels, but this equipment is typically housed within the facilities and would not be expected to exceed the 80 dBA Leq projected for exterior trucks. If it is assumed that the 80 dBA Leq level were produced continually for a period of 8-hours during the day, the calculated CNEL is 75 dBA as measured at a distance of 50 feet. The 65 dBA CNEL would fall at a distance of 158 feet. The General Plan and Zoning Code Update concentrates industry toward the north in The Canyon and the North Central Industrial Area; along the Metrolink rail line between Vermont Avenue and the northern edge of The Platinum Triangle; and, in various pockets along the I-5 Freeway, generally north of Santa Ana Street. Potential areas of land use-noise conflict could occur at the borders along the residential areas along Orangethorpe and La Palma Avenue), but also include other sensitive use areas such as schools and hospitals. The impact could be significant if a new industrial source that emits excessive noise is allowed along such a border area. In addition, because much of the industrial area is being replaced by more sensitive uses, these more sensitive uses could be sited near existing industrial facilities. Again, this could create a land use-noise conflict and a potentially significant impact. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-194 • The Planning Center May 2004 Relevant Goals and Policies Proposed General Plan policies related to operational noise include: • Continue to enforce acceptable noise standards consistent with health and quality of life goals and employ effective techniques of noise abatement through such means as a noise ordinance, building codes, and subdivision and zoning regulations. (Noise Element, Goal 1.1, Policy • Discourage the siting of sensitive uses in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL without appropriate mitigation. (Noise Element, Goal 1.1, Policy • Require that site-specific noise studies be conducted by a qualified acoustic consultant utilizing acceptable methodologies while reviewing the development of sensitive land uses or development that has the potential to impact sensitive land uses. (Noise Element, Goal 1.1, Policy • Discourage new projects located in commercial or entertainment areas from exceeding stationary-source noise standards at the property line of proximate residential or commercial uses, as appropriate. (Noise Element, Goal 3.1, Policy • Prohibit new industrial uses from exceeding commercial or residential stationary-source noise standards at the most proximate land uses, as appropriate. (Industrial noise may spill over to proximate industrial uses so long as the combined noise does not exceed the appropriate industrial standards.) (Noise Element, Goal 3.1, Policy • Expand and Enforce standards to regulate noise from construction activities. Particular emphasis shall be placed on the restriction of the hours in which work other than emergency work may occur. Discourage construction on weekends or holidays except in the case of construction proximate to schools where these operations could disturb the classroom environment. (Noise Element, Goal 3.1, Policy Proposed General Plan policies related to railroad noise include: • Encourage the construction of noise barriers by the Public Utilities Commission, Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Union Pacific, Burlington Northern & Santa Fe and Amtrak where residences exist next to the track. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy • Encourage the Public Utilities Commission, Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Union Pacific, Burlington Northern & Santa Fe and Amtrak to minimize the level of noise produced by train movements and whistle noise within the City by reducing speeds, reducing the number of nighttime operations, improving vehicle system technology and developing improved sound mitigation barriers where residences exist next to the track. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy • Encourage the use of sound-deadening matting (as opposed to wood) leading to, from and between the rails where public roads cross tracks in residential areas. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy Proposed General Plan policies related to construction noise include: • Continue to enforce the noise standards of the State Motor Vehicle Code and other State and Federal legislation pertaining to motor vehicle noise. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy • Employ noise mitigation practices, as necessary, when designing future streets and highways, and when improvements occur along existing highway segments. Mitigation measures should emphasize the establishment of natural buffers or setbacks between the arterial roadways and adjoining noise-sensitive areas. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy • Maintain roadways so that the paving is in good condition to reduce noise- generating cracks, bumps, and potholes. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy • Require sound walls, berms and landscaping along existing and future highways freeways and railroad rights-of-ways to beautify the landscape and reduce noise, where appropriate. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-195 Proposed General Plan policies related to reducing noise impacts to sensitive receptors include: • Discourage the siting of sensitive uses in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL without appropriate mitigation. (Noise Element, Goal 1.1, Policy • Require that site-specific noise studies be conducted by a qualified acoustic consultant for the development of sensitive land uses utilizing acceptable methodologies while reviewing the development of sensitive land uses or development that has the potential to impact sensitive land uses. (Noise Element, Goal 1.1, Policy Proposed General Plan policies related to reducing noise impacts from industrial land use include: • Discourage new projects located in commercial or entertainment areas from exceeding stationary-source noise standards at the property line of proximate residential or commercial uses, as appropriate. (Noise Element, Goal 3.1, Policy • Prohibit new industrial uses from exceeding commercial or residential stationary-source noise standards at the most proximate land uses, as appropriate. (Industrial noise may spill over to proximate industrial uses so long as the combined noise does not exceed the appropriate industrial standards.) (Noise Element, Goal 3.1, Policy 2) Existing Codes and Policies • The City shall restrict noise intensive construction activities to the hours specified under Chapter 6.70. of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 These hours shall also apply to any servicing of equipment and to the delivery of materials to or from the site. In addition, construction shall be restricted to weekdays and Saturdays between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Construction shall not be allowed any time on Sundays or Federally recognized holidays. Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures: 5.10-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits for any project generating over 100 peak hour trips, the project property owner/developers shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter and railroad, to meet City interior and exterior noise standards. Level of Significance After Mitigation: Implementation of the proposed General Plan Goals and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and mitigation measures listed above will reduce all potential short-term and long-term noise impacts to the extent feasible. However, as shown in Table 5.10-7, many roadways within the City are expected generate noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. As a result, in locations where these roadways are adjacent to existing sensitive land uses, the impacts are anticipated to remain significant. IMPACT: WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN EXPOSURE OF PERSONS TO OR GENERATION OF EXCESSIVE GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION OR GROUNDBORNE NOISE LEVELS Impact Analysis: Buildout of the Recommended Land Use Alternative could potentially expose more people to the impacts of groundborne vibration or noise levels. Although buildout would result in a smaller overall population when compared to the existing General Plan, increased exposure could occur through increased residential or employment densities on lands within proximity to noise generating activities. Specifically, vibration created through construction and industrial activities or through the ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-196 • The Planning Center May 2004 operation of motor vehicles and railways could create potentially significant impacts on the residents of Anaheim. Construction Vibration Impacts An aspect of construction is its accompanying vibration. Excessive groundborne vibration is typically caused by activities such as blasting, or the use of pile drivers during construction. Construction under the General Plan and Zoning Code update is not anticipated to may require blasting activities in the Hill and Canyon Area, and but pile driving could occur which would and produce vibration that could be felt at nearby land uses. These vibrations pose not only a nuisance, but also a risk to proximate structures. However, these impacts would be assessed at the time specific development applications are submitted. As a reasonable worst-case scenario, an impact pile driver, which would generate greater vibrations, is assumed. While the City has no vibration standards, Caltrans sets the criterion level for pile driving at between 0.2 and 2 inches per second. A reasonable worst-case scenario assumes the use of the 0.2 inch per second criterion. Caltrans presents the vibration produced by a 50,000 foot-pound force with distance for both clayey and sandy/silt soils as a function of distance. Caltrans indicates that the distance to the 0.2 inch per second minimum criterion falls at a distance of approximately 50 feet. Still, like construction, pile driving carries a high nuisance factor and vibration related to pile-driving activities is considered as potentially significant if these activities are performed within 200 feet of any permanent structures. Operational Vibration Impacts On-Road Mobile-Source Vibration Impacts Caltrans has studied the effects of propagation of vehicle vibration on sensitive land uses. Caltrans notes that “heavy trucks, and quite frequently buses, generate the highest earthborne vibrations of normal traffic.” Caltrans further notes that the highest traffic generated vibrations are along the freeways. Their study finds that “vibrations measured on freeway shoulders (5 m from the centerline of the nearest lane) have never exceeded 0.08 in/sec, with the worst combinations of heavy trucks. This level coincides with the maximum recommended “safe level” for ruins and ancient monuments (and historic buildings). Because sensitive land uses are not and will not be sited within this distance, any potential for significant vibration impacts is less than significant. Railroad Vibration Impacts Caltrans has studied the effects of propagation of train vibration on sensitive land uses and notes that train vibration levels may be quite high, depending on the speeds, load, condition of track, and amount of ballast used to support the track. Caltrans obtained measurement of train vibrations and using their highest recorded value, prepared a “drop-off curve.” The curve represents the maximum expected levels from trains, and is considered by Caltrans to be “very conservative.” The curve demonstrates that 0.08 in/sec level, the maximum recommended “safe level” for ruins and ancient monuments and used here as a significance threshold, occurs at a distance of 25 feet from the rails. The 0.2 in/sec level, at which there is a risk of architectural damage occurs at a distance of about 7.5 feet from the rails. Because sensitive land uses are not and will not be sited within these distances, any potential for significant vibration impacts is less than significant. Industrial Vibration Impacts The use of heavy equipment stamping tools) associated with industrial operations can create elevated vibration levels in their immediate proximity. While the level of this vibration is indeterminate, it ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR City of Anaheim • Page 5-197 certainly would not be expected to exceed that of railroad operations. Railroad operations are shown to create vibration levels under the most stringent Caltrans threshold levels at a distance of 25 feet from the rails. Any pieces of heavy vibration-causing equipment would be situated in excess of this distance from any sensitive land uses and any potential for impact is less than significant. Relevant Goals and Policies • See Relevant Goals and Policies listed above under “Noise Generation In Excess Of The City’s Noise Ordinance And/Or Related Policies.” Existing Codes and Regulations • The City shall restrict noise intensive construction activities to the hours specified under Chapter 6.70. of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 These hours shall also apply to any servicing of equipment and to the delivery of materials to or from the site. In addition, construction shall be restricted to weekdays and Saturdays between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Construction shall not be allowed any time on Sundays or Federally recognized holidays. Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are necessary. Level of Significance After Mitigation: No significant adverse impacts were identified and no mitigation measures are necessary. IMPACT: FOR A PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN AN AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN OR, WHERE SUCH A PLAN HAS NOT BEEN ADOPTED, WITHIN TWO MILES OF A PUBLIC AIRPORT OR PUBLIC USE AIRPORT, WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS; FOR A PROJECT WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A PRIVATE AIRSTRIP, WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS The Fullerton Municipal Airport is located approximately 2 miles away from Anaheim. In the most current data available, the Airport projected a maximum of 265,500 total operations for the year 2000. However, the 65 CNEL Noise Contour for Fullerton Airport does not extend into the City of Anaheim and no significant impacts are anticipated. Several heliports within the City of Anaheim are utilized for helicopter take-off and landing. According to the Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics, the City of Anaheim contains five heliports. These include two heliports associated with the Anaheim Police Department (police use), Boeing Anaheim B/250 (corporate use), Boeing Heliport/Building 203 (corporate use), and North Net Fire Training Center (fire department use). There are no private airstrips within the City. The Airport Land Use Commission’s (ALUC) was established to ensure that there are no direct conflicts with land uses, noise, or other issues that would impact the functionality and safety of airport and heliport operations. The ALUC requires that cities and counties general plans and zoning ordinances are consistent with Airport Environs Land Use Plans (AELLUP’s), which contain noise contours, restrictions for types of construction and building heights in navigable air space, as well as requirements impacting the establishment or construction of sensitive uses within close proximity to airports. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Environmental Analysis Page 5-198 • The Planning Center May 2004 Fullerton Municipal Airport and Los Alamitos Joint Training Base are regulated by AELUPs, both of which extend into the City of Anaheim. The ALUC has established an AELUP that addresses heliport operations within cities and counties, and which are applicable to the City of Anaheim. Relevant Goals and Policies Proposed General Plan policies related to reduction of potentially hazardous noise levels include: • Require private heliports/helistops to comply with the City noise ordinances and Federal Aviation Administration standards. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy 9) • Participate in the planning activities of County, regional and State agencies relative to the location of new airports and the assessment of their impact on the environment of the City. (Noise Element, Goal 2.1, Policy 101) Existing Codes and Regulations • Future projects shall comply with all relevant local, State, and federal regulations related to hazardous materials. Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Potentially significant. Mitigation Measures: 5.10-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, new development project property owner/developers shall use the most current available Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) as a planning resource for evaluating heliport and airport operations as well as land use compatibility and land use intensity in the proximity of Los Alamitos Joint Training Base and Fullerton Municipal Airport. Level of Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant. 5.10.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Implementation of the proposed General Plan Goals and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and mitigation measures listed above will reduce all potential short-term and long-term noise impacts to the extent feasible. Furthermore, the included mitigation for site operations could reduce any significant impacts on new, proposed development or the impact of any proposed industrial land uses to less than significant levels. However, as shown in Table 5.10-7, many roadways within the City are expected generate noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. As a result, in locations where these roadways are adjacent to existing sensitive land uses, the impacts are anticipated to remain significant.