Full Text
It THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN A Volume I DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REpORT lJJ I III ADDENtulV EIR No 313 State Clearinghouse No 91091062 City of Anaheim June 1994 Gus Ql4 ---PAGE BREAK--- On August 29 1994 tbe Anaheim City Planning Commission certified tbat EIR No 313 bas been completed in compliance witb the provisions of CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines that the E1R renects tbe independent judgement of tbe lead agency and tbat it bas reviewed and considered the contents therein and all related environmental documentation and refinements submitted through the public bearing process f t Ed h L Harris Secretary e ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFf Em Em NO 313 SCH NO 91091062 Prepared for e City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim California 92805 Prepared by Michael Brandman Associates 17310 Red Hill Avenue Suite 250 Irvine California 92714 Contact Joan Patronite Kelly AICP Project Director June 1994 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Soecilic Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1m Table of Contents i List of Appendices iii List of Tables iv List of Exhibits vii 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I I 1 12 Introduction I I Purpose and Scope of the EIR 1 3 12 I Purpose of the EIR 1 3 12 2 Scope of the EIR 1 6 12 3 Potential Impacts Found to Be Not Significant 1 8 1 2 4 Components of EIR Analysis 1 9 12 5 Review of the Draft EIR 1 0 Overview of the Planning Context 1 10 Alternatives Evaluated 1 12 14 1 9c tinUing Development Alternative 1 13 14 2 Land Use Alternative lpel r 1 13 14 3 Disneyland Reson Land Use Alternative 1 14 14 4 Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative I I4 14 5 Higher Intensity Land Use Alternative 1 14 MS itigation Mf il c i 0 do M M I IS ummary 0 W J tP cu an Itlgatlon easures AElls el sf SipifklAC9 Aft9r 4itigatiQR 1 15 L3 14 1 5 16 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPnON 0 0 0 2 1 2 I Project Location 0 2 I 2 2 Project Objectives 0 0 2 7 2 3 Methodology for Project Analysis 0 2 8 2 4 The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Description and Project Components o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 2 4 I Project Overview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 2 5 Intended Uses of the EIR Responsible Agencies and Discretionary Actions 0 0 0 2 20 2 5 I City of Anaheim General Plan Amendment 2 21 2 5 2 Specific Plan Adoption 2 24 2 5 3 Other Discretionary and Ministerial Actions 2 24 3 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS l fiTIGATION MEASURES AND SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS 0 3 1 1 3 1 Land Use Related Plans and Policies 3 1 3 2 Land Use Compatibility 3 2 1 CRAlCRA TOC Table of Contents 01427 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan Section TABLE OF CONTENTS continued fm 3 3 Transportation and Circulation 3 3 1 J J fJ j l1 pvJIAL ou ibId Cir tllatiaft 3 3 1 3 4 Air Quality 3 4 1 3 5 Noise 3 5 1 3 6 Earth Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity 3 6 1 3 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology 3 7 1 3 8 Employment Population and Housing 3 8 1 3 9 Public Services and Utilities 3 9 1 3 9 I Fire Protection 3 9 2 3 9 2 Police Services 3 9 12 3 9 3 Solid Waste Disposal Service 3 9 14 3 9 4 Parks 3 9 18 3 9 5 Schools 3 9 21 3 9 6 Water Service 3 9 40 3 9 7 Wastewater Sewer Service 3 9 46 3 9 8 Storm Drains 3 9 53 3 9 9 Electricity 3 9 63 3 9 10 Natural Gas Service 3 9 68 3 9 11 Telephone Service 3 9 70 3 9 12 Television ServicelReception 3 9 71 3 10 Hazardous Materials Compliance 3 10 1 3 11 Visual Resources and Aesthetics 3 11 1 3 12 Cultural Resources 3 12 1 3 13 Energy 3 13 1 3 14 Construction Impacts 3 141 4 0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 41 e CIlAJCRA TOe 4 1 Land UseRelated Plans and Policies 4 4 2 Land Use Compatibility 4 6 4 3 Transportation and Circulation 4 7 4 4 Air Quality 410 4 5 Noise 413 4 6 Earth Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity 415 4 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology 415 4 8 Employment Population and Housing 417 4 9 Public Services and Utilities 420 4 10 Hazardous Materials 430 4 11 Visual Resources and Aesthetics 431 4 12 Cultural Resources 431 4 13 Energy 431 01428 Ii Table of ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section TABLE OF CONTENTS continued fw 5 0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT 5 1 6 0 7 0 5 I Summary of Alternatives 5 1 5 2 The No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative 5 5 5 3 Modified Land Use Alternative 5 9 5 4 Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative Year 2000 Scenario 5 13 5 Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative Year 2008 Scenario 5 14 5 6 Environmentally Superior Alternative 5 17 THE RELATIONSIDP BETWEEN WCAL SHORT TERM USES OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF WNGTERM PRODUCTIVITY 6 1 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES 1HAT WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED 7 1 8 0 GROWTII INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTIONS 8 1 9 0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED 9 1 9 1 City of Anabeim 9 1 9 2 Other Agencies 9 1 9 3 Private Organizations 9 2 10 0 BIBUOGRAPHY 10 1 11 0 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL III 12 0 GWSSARY 12 1 13 0 Apoendic es A B C C I D E ABBREVIATIONS 13 1 ti of PMnaration Initial and rnmmen rs r 1 J V Ni1 fr e eson Specific Plan a 1M and UnderSeparate Cover Traffic Analysis Right of Way Requirements and Descriptions Noise Analysis fables Cultural Resources Repon CRAlCRA TOC Hi Table of Contents 01429 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort S ecific Pion Thbk 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 1 3 2 33 3 3 4 3 3 5 3 3 6 3 3 7 3 3 8 3 3 9 3 10 3 3 11 3 4 1 3 42 3 4 3 e 3 4 3 4 5 3 4 6 3 47 3 48 e UST OF TABLES PlI2e Summary of Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Acreage 2 2 Maximum Potential Hotel Development for the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan 2 16 Related Plans and Policies 3 1 3 Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Development Summary 3 2 2 Anaheim Reson Development Density Summary TabulationlDensity Designation for the 1 5 Widening Way 3 2 8 Setback Comparison 3 2 15 Existing ICU Summary 3 3 10 Committed Circulation System Improvements 3 3 15 Year 2000 2010 ICU Summary No Project 3 3 18 2000 Non Committed Background Intersection Improvements 3 21 2000 No Project ICU Values 3 3 21 2010 Non Committed Background Intersection Improvements 3 3 23 2010 ICU Summary No Project Plus Non Committed Improvements 3 3 25 Res I Anaheim Specific Plan Land Use Summary 3 3 29 Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Trip Generation Summary 3 3 33 2000 ICU Summary First Stage of Project 3 3 37 2010 ICU Summary With Project 3 3 40 Ambient Air Quality Standards 3 47 Summary of Air Quality Data Anaheim Air Monitoring Swion 3 4 15 Peak Daily Construction Emissions for the Anaheim Reson Spa PI Without Mitigation in 3 420 Cumulative Peak Day Construction EmissiollS in 2000 Without Mitigation in 3 421 P o 1 OH A L M Of Io 1 CoO 1 o t l t 1 lo Pgl s a h Ul I IIetlf f3f tft Gvu fcJ fi at S P li Baseline Pf ti6 P vl hl l 6dl VU tpF 3 424 I Carbon Monoxide Concentrations GIl Hour for Intersection Traffic at 5 6 P M Summer Baseline Projections Without Mitigation pPM 3 427 n 1o de 9 ncentrations Hour for Intersection Traffic at f mtel Baseline Projections Without Mitigation pPM 3 428 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations G8 Hour for Intersection Traffic at 12 Midnight I A M Winter Baseline Projections Without Mitigation pPM 3 429 01430 CJlAICRA TOC iv Table of ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson SDecific Plan Carbon Monoxide Concentrqations 8 Hour for Intersection Traffic at 12 Midnight to I a m Winter Baseline Projections Without Mitigation 3 4 30 City of Anaheim Exterior Noise Limits 3 54 Field Noise Measurement Results 3 5 8 Existing Roadway Noise Levels 3 5 12 Relationship Between Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale and Richter Magnitude 3 6 5 Recent Employment Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 1980 1990 3 8 2 3 8 2 Unemployment Rate Trends in the City of Anaheim and Orange County 1980 1990 3 8 3 Table 3 4 9 3 5 1 3 5 2 3 5 3 3 61 3 8 1 3 8 3 LIST OF TABLES continued faG Employment Forecasts for Two Zones Around the Project Area 20002010 3 8 4 3 8 4 Resident Worker Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 1980 1990 3 8 5 3 8 5 3 86 3 8 7 3 8 8 3 8 9 3 8 10 3 8 11 3 8 12 3 8 13 3 8 14 3 8 15 3 9 1 3 9 2 Resident Worker Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area 2000 2010 3 8 6 Recent Population Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 19801990 3 8 7 Population Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area 20002010 3 8 8 Age Distribution and Median Age Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 19801990 3 8 8 Recent Housing Stock Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 19801990 3 8 9 Housing Construction Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area 20002010 3 8 10 Estimated Net Employment Within the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Area 2010 3 8 12 Indirect Project Employment Compared to the 2010 Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area 3 8 12 Estimated New Employees by Job Type 3 8 16 Average Income Range for Selected Employee Occupations 3 8 17 Estimated Employees Likely to Relocate by Job Type 3 8 18 Existing Fire Station Locations Equipment and Staffing 3 9 3 Distance and Response Time by Station 3 96 CIlAICRA TOe v Table ofConens 01431 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson STJecific Plan Table 3 93 Ie 3 9 4 3 9 5 3 9 6 3 9 7 3 9 8 3 9 9 3 9 10 3 9 11 e 3 9 12 3 9 13a 3 9 13b 3 9 14 3 9 15 3 9 16 3 9 17 3 9 18 3 9 19 3 9 20 3 101 41 4 1 e UST OF TABLES continued P8le Anaheim Fire Department Response Calls Attributable to the Existing Anaheim Resort WlII990 3 9 7 jrted Solid Waste Generation Year 2010 3 9 16 City Parks and Facilities 3 9 20 Estimated Enrollment in Grade 7 12 Schools in the Project Vicinity 1992 93 School Year 3 9 24 Student Generation Rates for the Anaheim Union High School District 1992 93 School Year 3 9 25 Future AUHSD Enrollment Based on 1991 92 Student Generation Rates 3 9 25 Enrollment vs Capacity at Six AUHSD Schools in the Project Vicinity 1992 93 School Year 3 9 27 Future Enrollment vs Capacity Anaheim Union High School District 3 9 28 Inter district Transfers To and From the Anaheim Union High School District 1988 89 to 199091 3 9 29 Current Enrollment at Anaheim City School District Schools in the Project Vicinity 1992 93 3 9 30 Estimated Number ofDwelling Units Within ACSD School District Boundaries 3 9 32 Estimated Student Generation Rates for the Anaheim City School District 1992 93 School Year 3 9 32 Future ACSD Enrollment Based on 1992 93 Student Generation Rates 3 9 33 Enrollment vs Capacity at Four ACSD Schools in the Project Vicinity 1992 1993 3 9 36 Inter district Transfers to and From the Anaheim City School District 1987 88 to 199091 3 9 36 Proj ater Consumption Year 2010 3 9 43 c tA1S f J Ce c 50 a e rr M coed I ftA A Sewer System J rOJrIllll WitRiR 91ll1l 11 Y 3 9 51 Projected Electrical Consumption Year 20I0 3 9 66 Projected Natural Gas Consumption Year 2010 3 9 69 Location of Sites Included on Agency Lists Within a Quarter Mile of the Anaheim Resort F ific Plan A a 3 102 List of Projects Assumed for Cumulative Impacts Year 2 00 42 Cumulative Operational Emissions in the Year 2000 Without Mitigation 411 01432 CRAlCIlA TOC vi Table of ---PAGE BREAK--- AMheim Reson SDecific PlLm Exhibit 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 3a 2 3b 3 1 1 3 1 2 3 2 1 3 2 la 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 1 32 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 8 3 3 9 3 3 10 3 3 11 3 41 3 4 2 35 1 35 2 3 61 3 62 3 9 1 3 9 2 3 9 3 3 9 4 3 10 1 LIST OF EXlUBITS Regional Location 2 3 Vicinity Map 2 4 Aerial Photograph 2 5 Development Summary Plan 2 12 CoR District Development Density Plan Maximum Hotel Room Density 2 13 General Plan Land Use Designations 3 1 5 Anaheim Resort Specific PlanAnaheim Resort Boundaries 3 1 12 Existing Land Uses 3 2 3 Existing Zoning Designations 3 2 4 Mobile Home Park Overlay MHP Zone 3 2 11 Central Core Plan 3 2 16 Traffic Study Area 3 3 3 Existing 1991 ADT Volumes 3 3 8 Existing Intersection Location Map 3 3 11 Existing Rail Network 3 3 12 Year 2000 ADT Volumes no project 3 3 19 Year 2010 ADT Volumes no project 3 3 24 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Model Planning Areas 3 3 27 z 1 Win Fst St Q or 1J Ied Ceftf 2oooADTVolumes AllIIpRlJ 3 3 38 iI nn winhj t Veer 2010 ADT Volumes 1111 pAlJ 3 3 41 Year 2010 AM Peak Hour ICU Shares 3 3 44 Year 2010 PM Peak Hour ICU Shares 345 Wind Rose at Anaheim 1958 1975 3 45 SCAQMD Air MOnitoring NetWork 3 412 Land Use Compatibility Criteria for Community Noise Environment 3 5 5 Anaheim Resort Noise Study Locations 3 5 10 Typical Fault Motions 3 63 Major Regional Faults 3 6 Anaheim Resort Fire Response Time Study Points 3 9 5 c AIr 1 wer Area Facility Basms South Mea 3 9 50 alt d t ooter O ftlf S Y Bd kI dl S Lt 3 955 South Central Area Drainage Areas 3 9 58 Location of Sites Included on Agency List 3 103 CIlAICRA TOC vii Table of ColllelllS e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan Exhibit 3 11 1 3 II lab 3 II led 3 1I lef 3 1I lgh 3 1I 1i 3 1I 2a 3 11 2b 3 11 2e 3 11 2d 4 1 5 1 e LIST OF EXlDBITS continued P8le PhotographLoeationMap 3 11 3 Project Site Photographs A and B 3 114 ProjectSitePhotographs CandD 3 11 5 Project Site Photographs E and F 3 116 Project Site Photographs G and H 3 11 7 Project Site Photograph J 3 11 8 View of Harbor Boulevard Looking North of Freedman Way 3 11 11 View of Harbor Boulevard Looking North of Katella Avenue 3 11 12 View of Harbor Boulevard Looking South 3 11 13 View of Katella Avenue Looking West 3 11 14 Related Projects Location Map 4 5 Modified Land Use Alternative Hotel Circle 5 11 01434 Cl AlCRA TOe viii Table of ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR SECTION 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Anaheim has proposed the adoption ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan which sets forth a comprehensive development program to enhance and revitalize an area encompassing approximately 5495 acres within the 1 046 acre Anaheim Resort formerly referred to as the Commercial Recreation Area generally located adjacent to and southwest of the Santa Ana Freeway 1 5 in the City of Anaheim California City It is accessible from Harbor Boulevard Ball Road Freedman Way Katella Avenue West Street Orangewood Avenue Haster Street Walnut Street and Vermont Avenue The Anaheim Resort as the term is used in this document refers to an area designated for Commercial Recreation land uses on the City of Anaheim General Plan The Anaheim Resort area excludes another area within the City of Anaheim surrounding the Anaheim Stadium that is also designated Commercial Recreation The General Plan Commercial Recreation designation allows recreation tourist convention and other visitor serving uses The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Specific Plan No 92 2 also referred to in this EIR as the Specific Planl3li the Projectlis proposed to provide comprehensive land use planning and zoning for the proposed Specific Plan area Section 65450 et seq of the California Government Code planning and Zoning Law allows and regulates the establishment of Specific Plans Pursuant to Section 65450 the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will provide the City of Anaheim with an effective tool for the implementation of General Plan policies and priorities The goal of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is to guide the development and enhancement of portions of the land designated by the General Plan as Commercial Recreation by setting forth refined design guidelines zoning and development standards to replace the existing zoning regulations for the project area a new landscape streetscape program and a public facilities plan for the area The plan will permit the development of hotel convention retail and other visitor serving uses as well as the infrastructure improvements which will be needed to support the future development This Environmental Impact Report EIR No 313 State Clearingbouse No 91091062 has been prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan in accordance with the rules and regulations set forth in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The purpose of the EIR is to inform public agency decision makers and the general public about the proposed project and any potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with the planning and subsequent implementation of the Specific Plan and to identify appropriate feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may beadopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts For the purpose of analysis in this EIR the applicant for adoption of the CRAlCRA 1 1 1 Executive Summary 01435 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plml EIR Specific Plan is the City of Anaheim Throughout the EIR there is reference to property owner developer this refers to potential future developers of future development within the project area not the City of Anaheim This EIR will serve as the primary environmental document for the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and all futuredevelopment that is undertaken in the area pursuant thereto The EIR is anticipated to be the definitive environmental document for project implementation within the Specific Plan area including serving as aProject EIR for purposes of infrastructure improvements Developments which require discretionary review Le projects subject to the approval of a conditional use permit will be examined in light of this EIR to determine what additional environmental documentation must be prepared Developments which do not require additional discretionary review will not be subject to any additional environmental documentation However the property owner developer will be required to submit documentation substantiating said development is allowed and in conformance with the Specific Plan and that their environmental effects are within the parameters and timeframe year 2010 analyzed within this EIR I The actions involved in implementation of the proposed project include the following as described in Section 21 Intended Uses of the EIR Responsible Agencies and Discretionary Actions completion ofthe EIR review process and certification ofthe EIR approval ofamendments to the City of Anaheim s General Plan adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan including zoning and development standards design plan and guidelines and a public facilities plan that would regulate the development of the project area approval of a landscapelstreetscape program and an identity program for the Anaheim Resort approval of the non onfonning Sign Program approval of infrastructure financing programs properly acquisition wbich may involve the exercise of eminent domain proceedings and possible subdivision plans grading permits building permits and other actions related to the proposed construction development and operation offuture development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries e e As a separate action The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Specific Plan No 92 1 was approved on June 29 1993 This Specific Plan is intended to integrate the existing and proposed theme parks hotels and visitor serving facilities into a unified destination resort environment The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR was prepared to analyze the impacts associated with implementation of the Specific Plan and was certified by the Anaheim City Council on June 23 1993 The Hotel Circle Specific Plan bas been proposed on approximately 6 8 acres of the Anabeim Resort near the intersection of Katella Avenue and Zeyn Street A Noticeof Preparation for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan was circulated on October 29 1990 Subsequent to the preparation and circulation ofthe Notice of Preparation the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan was modified to substantially downscale 01436 Executive Summary 1 2 CRAlCRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR ultimate development within the plan area A proposed Specific Plan is currently being reviewed considered by the City Together the three Specific Plans include all of the area within the 1 046 acre Anaheim Resort This EIR focuses primarily on the potential effects of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan however the environmental evaluations for each issue address the potential cumulative impacts of the three Specific Plans within the total 1 046 acre Anaheim Resort Refer to Sections 3 I Land Use Related Plans and Policies and 4 0 Cumulative Impacts for additional discussion 1 2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF TIlE EIR 12 1 PURPOSE OF TIlE EIR The City of Anaheim is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA and is responsible for preparing the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR This EIR has been prepared in conformance with the CEQA California Public Resources Code Ai 21000ltWI California CEQA Guidelines California Code ofRegulations Title 14 Ai 15000l t mi and City of Anaheim CEQA Guidelines It is intended to serve as an informational document for the public agency decision makers and the general public regarding the objectives and components of the proposed project as well as the potential environmental impacts and describe mitigation measures and reasonable alternatives to the project This EIR is further intended to serve as the primary environmental document for subsequent actions within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project area including all local discretionary approvals requested to implement the Specific Plan In addition this EIR is the primary reference document in the formulation and implementation of a mitigation reporting or monitoring program for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan It is the intent of the City to use the EIR to permit the maximum amount of development proposed in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area consistent with the capacity of the area s infrastructure Future developments that require additional discretionary review ie Conditional Use Permit Specific Plan Amendment will require subsequent environmental review in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines The City of Anaheim which has the principal responsibility for processing and approving the project and other public agencies ie Responsible Agencies that may use this EIR in the decision making or permit process will consider the information in this EIR along with other information that may be presented during the CEQA process A more detailed discussion and identification ofthe Responsible Agencies is provided in Section 2 4 ofthis document In accordance with CEQA the public agencies will be required to make findings for each environmental impact ofthe project that cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance Ifthe lead agency and responsible agencies decide that the benefits eRACRA 1 3 Executive Summary e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- r e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR ofthe proposed project outweigh unmitigated significant environmental effects they will be required to make a statement of overriding considerations stating reasons to support their action This document analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to the degree of specificity required by Section 15146 of the State CEQA Guidelines The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan s purpose is to guide future development of a designated area rather than a specific proposal with detailed site plans As such the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is intended to provide guidance and consistency for future developments within the Specific Plan area Adoption ofthe Specific Plan would not directly result in development impacts however future implementation ofdevelopment within the Specific Plan area could indirectly result in development impacts from this Specific Plan The scope ofanalysis in this EIR therefore addresses an exhaustive and all inclusive range of impacts by considering the effects of development that may occur in the future I The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR is at minimum a Master EIR as defined in Section 21157 of the California Public Resources Code subd a The Master EIR may be prepared for any of the following General Plan Element General Plan Amendment or Specific Plan A multi planned project Projects that follow a previously approved need or regulation Projects consistent with a development agreement Projects within and consistent with a redevelopment plan and Transit projects that may be subject to multiple stages of review or approval e The intent of the Master EIR legislation is to obviate the need for later redundant environmental review of subsequent discretionary activities or projects that follow the expected course of action previously approved The Master EIR approach is appropriate for this project because it allows a comprehensive consideration ofthe reasonably anticipated scope ofdevelopment under the project and will serve as the base document for any futureenvironmental review necessary for development within the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan boundaries EiR This Master EIR is also project or project specific in that it is intended to environmentally clear I adoption ofthe proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 2 implementation ofthe Public Facilities Plan and project mitigation measures and 3 development within the Specific Plan area which conforms to the parameters and assumptions addressed in the EIR Developments proposed within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries that are within the scope of the Specific Plan and addressed in this EIR aa requirel no discretionary actions for future projects will not require any 1 4 01438 Execurive Summary ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific PIim EIR additional environmental clearance However specific development projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area which do not conform to the parameters and assumptions addressed in this EIR will require additional environmental review unless the City finds after preparing an Initial Study I that the subsequent project is within the scope ofthe Master EIR 2 that the project will not cause any additional significant effects on the environment not described in the Master EIR and 3 that no new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives are required to mitigate the subsequent project s significant environmental impacts California Public Resources Code Section 21157 1 subd c In order to be able to rely on this EIR as a Master EIR for more than 5 years the City of Anaheim must do one of the following after 5 years have elapsed since certification 1 review the EIR and make a finding that there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the EIR was certified or that no new information which was not known and could not have been known at the time of certification has become available or 2 prepare and certify a subsequent or supplemental EIR that is incorporated into and updates the EIR California Public Resources Code Section 21157 6 Because the pace and timing of development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be influenced by the potential buildout of The Disneyland Resort and other factors this EIR examines project impacts at two stages of development The first stage Vear 2000 represents an early stage ofdevelopment where approximately 1 000 hotelmotel rooms have been assumed to be developed and in operation in addition to existing conditions This has been estimated to occur by the year 2000 prior to the opening ofthe WESTCOT theme park which is assumed for analytical purposes to open in 2000 For CEQA analysis the second stage Vear 2010 is analyzed for full buildout 16 318 hotelmotel rooms in addition to existing conditions within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan This future development is assumed for analytical purposes to occur approximately 10 years after the assumed opening date of the WESTCOT theme park Although this full buildout condition is DOt likely to occur by the year 2010 it provides a threshold for use in designing project mitigation and public facility requirements Mitigation measures are developed to aa ommodate development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area at whatever pace it occurs This Draft EIR was prepared by a consultant under contract to the City of Anaheim Prior to public review it was extensively reviewed and evaluated by the City of Anaheim and this Draft EIR reflects the independent judgement ofthe City of Anaheim as required by CEQA Lists of organizations and CRAC1lA I 1 5 Executive Summary 01439 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR persons consulted and the report preparation personnel are provided in Sections 9 0 and 110 of this EIR 1 Z 2 SCOPE OF TIlE EIR I This EIR addresses the potential environmental effects ofthe proposed project The scope of the EIR includes both the areas of controversy identified by the City of Anaheim during the preparation ofthe Initial Study of environmental impacts and the Notice of Preparation NOP as well as issues raised by agencies and the general public in response to the NOP and at the scoping meeting as described below 1 Z2 1 Initial Studv The Initial Study is a preliminary assessment by the lead agency City of Anaheim to identify those environmental elements that would or may be significantly affected by the proposed project The Initial Study for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan formerly termed the C R Area Specific Plan analyzed the full range of categories and specific issues required by CEQA Appendix A Through this process the City determined that the EIR would address the project s potential environmental impacts in each of the categories listed below Land UseRelated Plans and Policies Section 3 1 Land Use Compatibility Section 3 Z Transportation and Circulation Section 3 3 Air Quality Section 3 4 Noise Section 3 5 Earth Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity Section 3 6 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology Section 3 7 Employment Population and Housing Section 3 8 Public Services and Utilities Section 3 9 Hazardous Materials Compliance Section 3 10 Visual Resources and Aesthetics Section 3 11 Cultural Resources Section 3 12 Energy Section 3 13 Cumulative Impacts Section 4 0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project Section 5 0 Growth Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Actions Section 8 0 e Construction impacts are discussed throughout Section 3 0 Environmental Conditions Environmental Impacts Mitigation Measures and Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts and summarized in Section 3 14 Construction Impacts 01440 Hi Executive Summary CIlAICRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR 1 2 2 2 SCODiD2 Process In compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines the City of Anaheim has taken steps to maximize the public s opportunity to panicipate in the environmental process A Notice of Preparation NOP was distributed on September 11 1991 via certified mail to agencies and other interested panies to solicit comments and inform the public of the proposed project The project was described and the public was invited to review the NOP lnitial Study Public comments on the issues discussed in the Initial Study were encouraged and solicited The close ofthe NOP review and comment period was October 11 1991 although letters received later were accepted The NOP the distribution list for the NOP the Initial Study and comment letters received during and after the NOP review period are attached to this EIR as Appendix A A public scoping meeting was held on October 2 1991 by the City of Anaheim to discuss the characteristics of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan the status ofthe project proposal and the nature of environmental issues to be addressed in the EIR Public notifiatioDS were mailed to public agencies and identified interested panies and advertised in area newspapers prior to the meeting The scoping process provided an opportunity for public input regarding environmental CODCerns that should be addressed in the EIR Since the close of the NOP review and comment period the proposed project has beeD modified in response to the final adoption and certification of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and EIR respectively The proposed project bouDdaries have been adjusted to include an approximate 56 acre agricultural field located in the southern portion of the Anaheim Resort Additionally the name of the project has been cbanged from the CoR Area Specific Plan to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Other refinements bave been made as a result of comments received during the NOP process 1 2 2 3 Areas or Cootro ersv and IssufS 10 Be R ed This EIR addresses the areas ofcontroversy and issues which required resolution that were 1cnown to the City of Anaheim or were raised by agencies and the public during the scoping process Many of these were identified during the initial study process as described above The following summarizes the primary areas ofcontroversy related to environmental effects wbich were raised during the public scoping process and the section of the EIR in wbich these issues are addressed Project compatibility with adjacent residential neigbborboods Disneyland and proposed Disneyland Resort Project Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation and Section 3 1 I Visual Resources and CIlACIlA I 1 7 Executive Summary 01441 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific PlL1n EJR Aesthetics Project compatibility with County Growth Management Plan Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility Area traffic impacts and project traffic on local streets and parking conditions Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation Noise from project related traffic Section 3 5 Noise Air quality impacts Section 3 4 Air Quality Enhancement Improvements Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility Section 3 11 Visual Resources and Aesthetics Property values Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility Housing availability Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing Recreational areas public lands and parks Section 3 9 4 Parks Landform modification Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility Section 3 6 Earth Resources and Section 3 11 Visual Resources and Aesthetics e Public Services and utilities Section 3 9 A ternatives Section 5 0 Cumulative impacts Section 4 0 The issues to be resolved by the City ofAnaheim include the choice among alternatives including the proposed project and whether or how to mitigate the environmental effects ofthe proposed project 1 23 POTENTIAL IMPACTS FOUND TO BE NOT SIGNIFICANT Through the Initial Study and public scaping process the City determined that there was no evidence that the project would cause significant environmental effects in the following areas and determined that no further environmental review of these issues was necessary for the reasons described below Natural or fabricated featUres in the project area that are rare or unique No further environmental review ofthis issue wasrequired because there are no rare or unique natural or fabricated featUres within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries e Prominent or specimen trees as defined in the Anabeim Municipal Code Section 8 84 038 Tree Preservation or any rare threatened or endangered plants in the project area No further environmental review of these issues is required because there are no natural resources of this kind within the project area Further Section 1 8 Executive Summnru CIlAICRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plml EIR 18 84 038 pertains to specimen trees in Anaheim s Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone which encompasses Anaheim s eastern Hill and Canyon Area the proposed project area is not within that zone Habitat food source nesting place source of water migratory path or other resource for any rare threatened or endangered wildlife or fish species No further environmental review of these issues is required because none of these resources exist in the project area or would be affected by the implementation of the proposed project 1 24 COMPONENTS OF EIR ANALYSIS The analysis of each environmental category within Section 3 0 is organized into the following subsections Environmental Conditions Environmental Impacts Mitigation Measures Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Environmental Conditions describes the physical conditions which exist before commencement of the project and which may influence or affect the issue under investigation Environmental Impacts describes potential environmental changes to the existing physical conditions which may occur if the proposed project is implemented Mitigation Measures are those specific measures which may be required of the project by the decision maker in order to I avoid an impact 2 minimize an impact 3 rectify an impact by restoration 4 reduce or eliminate an impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations or 5 compensate for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environment Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts are identified where mitigation is not expected to reduce the project impacts to insignificant levels Another component of the EIR is the analysis of cumulative impacts Section 4 0 Cumulative impacts take into account the environmental impacts of the project combined with environmental impacts of other related past present and reasonably foreseeable future projects termed related projects This section analyzes each environmental category in terms of cumulative impacts associated with implemenwion ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan relative to The Disneyland Resort Project as approved Hotel Circle as proposed and other related projects for the years 2000 and 2010 The EIR includes an alternatives discussion that analyzes a reasonable range of alternatives that could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project and evaluates the comparative merits of the alternatives This EIR includes an evaluation of the following alternatives to the proposed project CRAJCRA I 1 9 Executive Summary 01443 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR I a no projectJcontinuing development alternative 2 a modified land use alternative that would include the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and the properties encompassed within the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan area 3 three land use alternatives incorporated by reference from The Disneyland Resort EIR for the 56 acre agricultural parcel 4 two lower intensity land use alternatives for year 2000 and 2008 and 5 the environmentally superior alternative In addition a higher intensity land use alternative was initially considered but eliminated from further review refer to Section 15 of this document 12 5 REVIEW OF THE DRAFf EIR This Draft EIR was distributed to Responsible Agencies other affected agencies surrounding cities and newspapers The Notice of the Availability of the Draft EIR was also distributed as required by CEQA During the 45 1ay public review period the EIR including the appendices is available for review at the City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 S Anaheim Boulevard and or for review at all Anaheim Public Libraries In addition documents referenced in the EIR are available for review or arrangements can be made for review and or purchase at the City of Anaheim Planning Department Written comments on the EIR should be addressed to City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim California 92805 Upon completion ofthe 45 1ay public review period responses to all significant environmental issues raised will be prepared and available for review at least 10 days prior to the public hearing before the Planning Commission at which the certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report will be considered These comments and their responses will be included as part of the environmental record for consideration by decision makers for the project 1 3 OVERVIEW OF THE PLANNING CONTEXT e The Anaheim Resort is an approximate 1 046 acre area designated Commercial Recreation in the City of Anaheim s General Plan a planning designation which permits primarily recreation tourist convention and other visitor serving uses The Anaheim Resort is generally located southwest of 1 5 between Vermont Avenue and Orangewood Avenue and east of Walnut Street and encompasses the adopted 489 7 acre Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area the proposed 6 8 acre Hotel Circle Specific 01444 1 10 Execurive Summary CIlACRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Plan area and the proposed 5495 acre Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area the latter being the subject of this EIR Existing land uses in the Anaheim Resort include the Anaheim Convention Center the existing Disneyland theme park and a number of hotel motel commercial and retail establishments In 1989 the City of Anaheim initiated the Enhancement Program and TransportationLand Use Strategy Plan for the Anaheim Resort formerly referred to as the Commercial Recreation Area The goal of the City s efforts was to address the need for visual enhancement and infrastructure improvements including public utility and transportation in the Anaheim Resort Specifically the goal of the Enhancement Program was to comprehensively address signage landscaping and other land use and site development issues The TransportationLand Use Strategy Plan s goal was to assess existing and future transportation conditions and recommend improvements commensurate with land use intensification projections over the next 20 years In 1990 the Anaheim City Council adopted a revised Commercial Recreation C R Zoning Ordinance and established Design Guidelines for the Anaheim Resort The CoR Zone currently regulates the majority ofthe properties within the Specific Plan area The other existing zoning designations include the PR Public Recreational Zone the RS A 43 OOO Residential SingleFamily Zone and the MHP Mobile Home Park Overlay Zone In order to further implement the goals for the Anaheim Resort the City ofAnaheim has initiated the preparation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan These goals include provision for the continued development of convention and visitor serving uses in the Anaheim Resort whileensuring consistency between land uses enhancement of aesthetic conditions in the area through standards for design landscaping and signage and coordination of development with needed infrastructure improvements If adopted the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will replace and supersede the existing Commercial Recreation Zoning and Development Standards and Design Guidelines and redesignate properties within the project area to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone The adopted Disneyland Resort Specific Plan which was analyzed in a separate EIR EIR 311 certified in June 1993 facilitates the development of a world class destination resort by consolidating the existing Disneyland theme park and new theme park s hotels and other visitor serving facilities in proximity to one other The proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan addresses implementation ofapproximately 1 103hotel rooms on approximately 68 acres in the Anaheim Resort The Specific Plan and environmental documentation addressing the project specific impacts of implementation of the Specific Plan are currently under review consideration by the City As such the specific components of the Hotel Circle Specific Plan and the environmental consequences of the proposed Specific Plan are not CIlAICRA 1 1 11 Execulive Summary 01445 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR addressed in detail in this EIR Ifthe Hotel Circle Specific Plan is not ultimately approved this EIR analyzes an alternative which would modify the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to include the Hotel Circle project site refer to Section 5 0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project As previously mentioned the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan which is the subject of this EIR the adopted Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan are separate projects covering separate portions ofthe Anaheim Resort Because plans for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan have been approved and comprise portions ofthe Anaheim Resort coordination between the Anaheim Resort and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plans has been and will continue to be necessary to ensure that elements of the plans are complementary such as definition of the boundaries of each specific plan and the design of public facilities utilities and transportation networks Refer to Section 2 0 for a more detailed discussion of the relationship of these Specific Plans While three separate specific plans encompass the area and are defined as separate projects this EIR also evaluates the cumulative environmental effects of the implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and development ofthe surrounding area under the adopted Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan see Section 4 Cumulative Impacts 14 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED I The City of Anaheim has analyzed various alternatives to the proposed project to evaluate the opportunity for avoiding or lessening environmental impacts Section 5 0 provides detailed descriptions and analysis of each alternative in adequate detail to allow the decision maker to decide whether or not an alternative should be adopted in lieu of the proposed project as well as an analysis of the environmentally superior alternative As noted in Section 12 2 the Specific Plan alternatives respond to a range of issues identified during formulation and refinement of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e Section I5l26 d of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR describe a range of reasonahle alternatives to the project or to the location of the project which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives For the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR an analysis of alternative location s was not pursued because such an alternative would not attain the basic objectives of the project The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area which constitutes the project location for EIR purposes was designated by the City of Anaheim in light ofthe commercial recreation uses which exist or have been historically encouraged in the area The most notable land uses in the study area which influence this existing commercial recreation character include the Anaheim Convention Center and the existing Disneyland theme park Numerous hotels motels restaurants retail stores and other associated commercial uses have over the past co o CRAlCRA I 1 2 Execurivt Summary I ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR 35 years been established throughout the study area The City s General Plan currently designates the subject area for Commercial Recreation land uses in recognition ofthe desire to continue such uses in the City s long term growth plans It is fully expected that such uses will continue to develop and redevelop within the Anaheim Resort The basic objective ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is to set forth the framework and criteria in which the pattern of growth for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is envisioned It is important to note that the proposed project as addressed in the EIR is a planning program particular to a geographic area As such it is contrary to the basic nature and objective of the project to consider applying the proposed Specific Plan to an alternative location The following summarizes the alternatives considered in detail in Section 5 0 1 4 1 NOPROJECT CONTINUING DEVEWPMENT ALTERNATIVE The No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative assumes that implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would not take place and that land use designations development standards and regulations would remain as they pertain to the area today or with minor adjustments and as stated in the Commercial Recreation designation of the General Plan This alternative also assumes that implementation ofThe Disneyland Resort Specific Plan proceeds as adopted but that the Hotel Circle Specific Plan is withdrawn or not approved Under this alternative property owners developers may continue to develop up to 75 units per parcel under a building permit but may seek additional density under a conditional use permit a discretionary action Although it is not possible to quantify the potential range and scenarios of development impacts under this alternative it is likely that impacts generated by future developments could be generally greater than those associated with the guidance and comprehensive planning proposed for development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project 1 4 2 MODIFIED LAND USE ALTERNATIVE HOTEL CIRCLE The Modified Land Use Alternative assumes that the aforementioned 489 7 acre Disneyland Resort Specific Plan is implemented as approved but that the 6 8 acre Hotel Circle Specific Plan document is not approved or approved as proposed and therefore is included in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area increasing the project to 556 3 acres Alternative uses commensurate with Anaheim Resort Specific Plan land use designations would be proposed for the properties included in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan boundaries The properties within the Hotel Circle Specific Plan would be designated I 10 for the same hotel density as proposed in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan rooms as was analyzed in Cumulative Impacts Section 4 0 of this EIR C1lAICIVd 1 13 Executive Summary 01447 1 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e lee Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 14 3 DISNEYLAND RESORT LAND USE ALTERNATIVE e This EIR incorporates by reference the three Disneyland Resort EIR land use alternatives for the 56 acre agricultural parcel located in the southeast portion ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan originally proposed to be included within the boundaries of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan The three land use alternatives analyzed for this parcel include proposed development of a regional shopping center development ofthe site for public parking and development of a theme park at a scale larger than the third theme park analyzed as part of The Disneyland Resort Section 5 0 Alternatives summarizes each land use alternative for the 56acre parcel and details why an alternative mayor may not be feasible or appropriate for consideration within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area e 1 4 4 LOWER INTENSITY LAND USE ALTERNATIVES e e Two lower intensity land use alternatives are analyzed in this EIR the Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative Year 2000 and the Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative Year 2008 Implementation of the Lower Intensity Alternative Year 2000 assumes that the first stage of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is developed resulting in a net increase of approximately 1 000 rooms within the Specific Plan area by the Year 2000 This alternative is summarized in Section 5 0 and in detail throughout Sections 3 0 and 4 0 ofthis EIR A second lower intensity land use alternative has been analyzed based on a fiscal analysis prepared for the City of Anaheim by Economic and Planning Systems EPS 1993 The Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative 2008 scenario assumes full development and operation of The Disneyland Resort by the year 2008 and corresponding induced growth ofapproximately 5 000 hotel rooms withinthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area by the Year 2008 The Year 2008 alternative scenario assumes development ofapproximately 11 300 fewer hotel rooms as compared to the proposed project and as substantiated by the Fiscal Analysis prepared by EPS 1993 Refer to Section 5 0 Alternatives for a detailed description of the Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative Year 2008 Both of these alternatives assume that the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan is approved as proposed e 1 45 mGHER INTENSITY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE ee Implementation ofthe higher density land use alternative would assume an increase in the maximum level of land use densities currently proposed in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project This alternative anticipates development of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the Hotel Circle Specific Plan as presently adopted and or proposed with an increase in development intensity applied only to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The higher intensity land use alternative would result 01448 CRACIlA I 1 14 Execurive Summary ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR in an increase in the intensity of hotel motel and accessory uses Ancillary uses would include visitor serving commercial retail uses and restaurants as described in the proposed project The impact analysis for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is based on the maximum land use density that would likely occur over the next 16 years 2010 and at a density that can be supported and or balanced by existing and or proposed infrastructUre capacity improvements An increase in density above the 27 508 hotel rooms allowed by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by 2010 could not reasonably be supported by infrastructure capacity improvement programs currently in place and or planned concurrently with Specific Plan proposals within the Anaheim Resort to accommodate projected growth to the year 2010 Further this alternative would not support the City s goal to balance infrastructUre improvements with anticipated growth for the Anaheim Resort For this reason this alternative has been eliminated from further consideration and analysis 15 MITIGATION MONITORING CEQA requires public agencies to set up monitoring or reporting programs for the purpose ofensuring compliance with those mitigation measures adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects identified in environmental impact reports A mitigation monitoring program will be adopted at the time of certification ofthe EIR and will be made a part of the final EIR The mitigation monitoring program will also be included for ease of reference as an appendix to the final Specific Plan document 16 SUMMARY OF SIGNIF1CANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MRA IIIRQ A detailed discussion and analysis of project impacts and recommended mitigation measures is presented in Section 3 0 Environmental Conditions Environmental Impacts Mitigation Measures and Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Project related impacts have been mitigated to the extent feasible However there are some project related impacts that are unavoidable and cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level These impacts will remain significant after mitigation and are briefly summarized below Land Use Related Plans and Policies The conversion of 56 acres of land designated prime agricultural land is considered a significant and unavoidable adverse impact Land Use Compatibility Future developments under the terms of the Specific Plan could result in indirect compatibility impacts with adjacent residential uses located along the periphery of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area CJtAICRA I IS Executive Summary 01449 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Traffic Four intersections will operate at unacceptable levels of service in the year 2010 with implementation of the proposed project and implementation of the identified non committed and committed background improvements These intersections are noted below Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road n hei aster Street and Katella Avenue 5l S e and Orangewood Avenue Lewis Street and Katella Avenue Air Quality Construction emissions will result in significant unavoidable NOx CO and PM 1 0 impacts on a temporary basis Utility usage stationary sources onsite service engines and mobile source emissions attributable to the project will result in significant increases in emissions of reactive organic gases nitrogen oxides carbon monoxide and PMIO emissions in 2000 and 2010 both on aproject specific and cumulative basis Schools Projected project and residential development fees from new project employees will not cover the cost to the school districts projected from new students Solid Waste Because of limited landfill capacity the impact to landfill capacity is expected to remain significant Visual Resources Aesthetics Potential impacts may occur from shadeshadow to residences adjacent to the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area Construction Construction impacts are addressed with each environmental issue analysis As a summary the following significant unavoidable environmental effects are anticipated as a result of construction Land Use Compatibility Section 3 2 Traffic Section 3 3 Air Quality Section 3 4 and Visual Resources Section 3 11 Please refer to the referenced sections for a more detailed discussion and Section 3 14 Construction Impacts for a summary of these issues Additionally the following significant cumulative impacts have heen identified Land use compatibilities inherent in the juxtaposition and proximity of commercial and residential uses Cumulative air quality impacts related to emissions of ROO NOx CO and PMIO which will exceed SCAQMD significance thresholds significant cumulative SOx emissions may also occur but are required to be offset Solid Waste impacts because of limited landfill capacity Potential impacts related to cumulative consumption of electricity and natural gas 01450 CRAlCRA I 1 16 Executive ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific PILm EIR Cumulative water consumption impacts associated with implementation of specific developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and other related projects in the vicinity CRAlCIlA I 1 17 Executive Summary 01451 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plim e e SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 1 PROJECT LOCATION e The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is located in the City of Anaheim 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 7 miles northwest of Santa Ana in central Orange County The regional setting of the project is shown in Exhibit 2 1 Regional Location The project site is located generally west of the Interstate 5 1 5 corridor south of Vermont Avenue east ofWalnut Street and north of Orangewood Avenue Regional access to the project vicinity is provided by 1 5 via West StreetBall Road Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue Freedman Way Local access to the project vicinity is provided via Ball Road Freedman Way West Street Orangewood Avenue Anaheim Boulevard Haster Street Katella Avenue Walnut Street Harbor Boulevard and Vermont Avenue The local vicinity is shown in Exhibit 2 2 An aerial photograph of the project vicinity is shown in Exhibit 2 3 e e e The Anaheim Resort is designated for Commercial Recreation land uses by the City s General Plan and is located on approximately 1 046 acres located generally southwest of1 5 between Katella Avenue and West Street interchanges The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan which is the subject of this EIR encompasses approximately 5495 acres of the Anaheim Resort and is currently zoned CoR Commercial Recreation PR Public Recreational and RS A 43 OOO Residential Agricultural A few of the parcels also have the MHP Mobilehome Park Overlay designation The Specific Plan establishes two land use Districts and a Mobilehome Park Overlay the 317 6acre CoR Commercial Recreation District which allows for hotels motels convention and conference facilities as well as restaurants retail shops and entertainment facilities the 62 8 acre PR Public Recreation District which encompasses the Anaheim Convention Center associated parking facilities and the Anaheim Hilton Hotel and provides for the orderly use of City owned properties such as the Anaheim Convention Center and adjacent private properties and the 31S lIl Te Mobilehome Park MHP Overlay which encompasses existing mobilehome parks within the CoR District and provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations and procedures to mitigate relocation problems and advene effects ofdisplacement upon mobilehome owners when a park is converted to another land use Also encompassed by the Specific Plan boundaries are approximately 15 I acres identified by Caltrans for future 1 5 right of way and approximately 143 2 acres of public right of way Adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would replace the current zoning designations for the project area It would also replace and supersede the CoR Zone requirements in chapter 18 48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code Refer to Table 2 1 1 for a summary of the acreage included within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries e e ee CRAlCRA 2 2 1 Project Description 01452 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plml TABLE 2 1 1 SUMMARY OF ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN ACREAGE Approximate Qf W ay Acreage Commercial Recreation C R 317 6 District Development Area 1 Public Recreation PR District 62 8 Development Area 2 1 5 Widening Area 15 1 Public Right Qf Way 154 0 Tota 5495 Acreage identified by Caltrans as future land to be acquired for 1 5 right of way Until such time as this land is acquired by Caltrans it will be subject to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone CoR District and the density designation in which the property is located Plans showing the properties affected by the 1 5 widening are on file with the City Public WorkslEngineering Department Encompasses the 31S acre Mobile Home Park MHP Overlay Source SWA 1994 Land uses encompassed by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan include the Anaheim Convention Center a mix of commercial retail and visitor serving uses and land used for agricultural purposes Surrounding land uses include the adopted 489 7 acre Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the proposed 6 8 acre Hotel Circle Specific Plan as well as a mix of commercial retail and visitor serving uses Single and multi family neighborhoods are located adjacent to or in the vicinity of the project boundaries The surrounding land uses are shown on an aerial photograph Exhibit 2 3 and an Existing Land Use Map in the Map Pocket A more detailed discussion of surrounding land uses is provided in Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility 2 1 ANAHEIM RESORT CONTEXT Existing land uses in the Anaheim Resort include the Anaheim Convention Center the existing Disneyland theme park and a number of hotel motel commercial and retail establishments In 1989 the City of Anaheim initiated the Enhancement Program and TransponationlLand Use Strategy Plan for the Anaheim Resort formerly referred to as the Commercial Recreation Area 01453 CRAlCRA 2 2 2 Project Description el e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e ee e Burbank Ontario Anaheim Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area MIl Michael Brondman Associms 55 O 694 2 3 Ne SuJ Exhibit 2 1 Regional Location Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- l Lincoln Avenue Riverside Freeway Highway 97 Orangethorpe A venue La Palma A venue Crescent Avenue Orange A venue Ball Road Cerritos A venue Katella A venue Orangewood Avenue Cnapman Avenue Q 0 Q Q Q 11 0 5 1 c g 0 S B 0 0 0 0 as l LU Sourcs SWA June 1994 Legend 1 Anaheim Rcson Boundary Anaheim Reson Specific PI n Are Il Cl C o Il 9l Eo o 2 Miles 00550010 694 Exhibit 2 2 Vicinity Map Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIW Mm Michad Brandm nAssoO lCS 2 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e Legend jI o 2lXXl teel Lmil ofAnaheim R son I iiiiiil Anaheim Raon Specific Pbn SOllfC SWA Jun 1994 m1 Midud Brandnun Associates Exhibit 2 3 Aerial Photograph Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 00550010 694 2 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The goal of the City s efforts was to address the need for visual enhancement and infrastructure improvements including public utility and transportation in the Anaheim Resort Specifically the goal of the Enhancement Program was to comprehensively address signage landscaping and other land use and site development issues The TransportationLand Use Strategy Plan s goal was to assess existing and future transportation conditions and recommend improvements commensurate with land use intensification projections over the next 20 years In 1990 the Anaheim City Council adopted a revised Commercial Recreation C R Zoning Ordinance and established Design Guidelines for the Anaheim Resort The CoR Zone currently regulates the majority ofthe properties within the Specific Plan area The other existing zoning designations include the PR Public Recreational Zone the RS A 43 OOO Residential Single Family Zone and the MHP Mobile Home Park Overlay Zone The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan document along with the Draft EIR No 311 was circulated for public review on November 12 1992 see Section 13 Overview of Planning Context Subsequent to public hearings held by both the Planning Commission and City Council EIR No 311 was certified by the City Council onJune 22 1993 The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan was adopted by ordinance of the City Council on June 29 1993 and is not part of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan As noted in Section 10 Executive Summary the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan are complementary in terms of design guidelines public facilities and zoning and development standards Equally important is that development in both specific plan areas will serve many of the very same visitors and guests thereby enhancing the destination resort character of the overall Anaheim Resort The hotel and motel development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will to a large extent accommodate overnigbt visitors to attractions at The Disneyland Resort Anaheim Convention Center and other area attractions The creation of an enhanced destination resort from eacb complimentary specific plan component of the Anaheim Resort will yield benefits from an environmental standpoint The proximity ofthe attractions Disneyland WESTCOT Convention Center etc and the botels and motels wbich serve them reduces vebicle travel and resulting traffic and air pollution Extensive parking pedestrian and mass transit facilities are planned as part ofthe two specific plans tbese will reduce reliance on the automobile as a means oftravel in and around the Anaheim Resort There are also environmental benefits from enhancing the Anaheim Resort and accommodating the increase in the length of stay for visitors thereby reducing overall vacation travel and decreasing air quality and traffic impacts througbout the region CRAJCRA 2 H Project Descriprion 01457 e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e The Hotel Circle Specific Plan has been proposed for a 6 8 acre portion of the Anaheim Resort near the intersection of Katella Avenue and Zeyn Street A Notice of Preparation NOP for an EIR for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan was circulated on October 29 1990 a proposed Specific Plan document is currently being processed by the City of Anaheim Planning Department Subsequent to the circulation ofthe NOP the Hotel Circle project applicant modified the proposed plan by substantially downscaling the development plan to 1 103 hotel rooms The City of Anaheim has since determined that an EIR will not be required for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared e 2 2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The City of Anaheim has established development and community objectives relative to the proposed project The objectives are intended to set the framework and criteria in which the pattern of growth for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is envisioned The community objectives take into consideration the project development objectives by proclaiming the importance of community enhancement and participation in the Anaheim Resort development process It is the City s intent that the expanded growth of the City s economic potential must be fostered Especially relevant to development of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are the following General Plan Policies e Maintain and encourage Anaheim s position as a nationally recognized tourist convention and recreation center e Increase sales tax yields and further enhance the economic base of the community thereby lessening the tax burden on real property Encourage the development of quality facUities which complement conventions family entertainment and recreation within appropriate areas of the community e Maintain the integrity of the Commercial Recreation Area now referred to as the Anaheim Resort by permitting only compatible land uses within this designated area e These General Plan policies will be implemented through the following overall goals ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan To foster the growth of the City s economic potential by revitalizing the Anaheim Resort ee To treat all landowners and users in the Anaheim Resort area fairly while recognizing the economic and social needs of the entire City CRAlCRA 2 2 7 01458 Project Description ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan To ensure that development complements the City s investment in the Anaheim Convention Center and other area resources and interests To maintain and enhance existing recreation and convention oriented land uses To protect adjacent residential land uses by buffering them from land use impacts associated with development of the Anaheim Resort To maintain or enhance traffic and circulation in and around the Anaheim Resort To provide convenient access to all hotel restaurant and retail opportunities in the Anaheim Resort to enhance the areawide tourist experience To protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from unnecessary intrusion by vehicles traveling to and from the Anaheim Resort To accommodate potential future regional transportation networks into the Plan To provide for necessary public infrastructure and services to maximize the development potential of the Anaheim Resort To create a coherent unique resort identity that reinforces the image ofthe Anaheim Resort as a high quality destination resort To establish a high quality pedestrian environment To improve the aesthetic character of the Anaheim Resort by visually defining the boundaries with appropriate landscape treatments 2 3 METIlODOLOGY FOR PROJECT ANALYSIS The analysis of impacts associated with implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan has been prepared for the years 2000 and 2010 For project analysis the assumption was made that all hotelmotel development approved or in process within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area see Table 41 List of Projects Assumed for Cumulative Impacts will be built by the year 2000 1 005 hotel rooms and full buildout of an additional 15 3I3 hotel rooms will be generated by the year 2010 This represents a net increase of 16 318 botel rooms over existing conditions Added to the number ofexisting botel rooms 11 190 the total number of boteI rooms allowed within the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan area would be 27 508 Implementation of the Specific Plan would thus increase the number of rooms within the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan area by approximately 146 percent by year 2010 overexisting conditions The maximum hotel room density allowed by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan or 100 percent of the allowed density would result in a net increase of 16 318 rooms within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area by the year 2010 CRAlCllA 2 2 8 Project Description 01459 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan The methodology assumes that a maximum of 25 496 hotel rooms 9 590 existing and 15 906 additional would be allowed within the C R District refer to Table 2 3 1 1 and that for analysis purposes this EIR analyzes the impacts ofup to 2 012 hotel rooms 1 600 existing and 412 additional in the PR District This methodology assumes that implementation of the proposed Caltrans 1 5 Widening Program as addressed in Sections 3 1 and 3 3 is completed by the year 2000 However until such time as the Caltrans 1 5 Widening Program proceeds the IS I acres designated in the Widening Program for freeway right fway are subject to the requirements ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan C R District and the density designation in which the acreage is located A maximum of 1 129 hotel rooms would be permitted for the 15 1 acres per the Specific Plan Density Plan For the purpose of this EIR the environmental impact analysis is based on the assumption that 100 percent of the maximum allowable density within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be developed by year 2010 However thereare many existing hotels motels that are currently developed at adensity far less than the maximum allowable densities proposed by the Specific Plan Thus the majority of existing hotel motel development would have to be rebuilt or expanded to obtain the maximum number of units per acre allowed by the proposed Specific Plan In addition there are many restaurants and other retail businesses that will not be replaced by hotels motels Given other factors such as financial constraints market demand design considerations and or the need to mitigate environmental impacts it is most probable that maximum projected year 2010 hotel room densities within the Specific Plan area will not be achieved within the timeframe analyzed in this EIR Therefore this analysis is an aggressive estimate ofthe maximum possible number of hotel rooms that may be constructed in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area 2 4 THE ANARF TM RF80RT SPECIFIC PLAN DESCRIPI10N AND PROJECT COMPONENTS 2 4 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The project is the proposed implemenwion ofaspecific plan to be called the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan covering approximateJy 549 5 acres of land designated by the City of Anaheim in the General Plan as Commercial Recreation This designation permits development of uses such as hotels theme parks visitor serving retail and other similar uses intended to provide for the needs of tourists and Convention Center visitors The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will implement the General Plan policies and objectives and will contain the development regulations and standards that will serve as the zoning for the subject area Adoption ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will lead to continued development ofthe area with retail businesses family riented entertainment lodging recreation and CRAlCRA 2 2 9 Project Description o co o ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan touristvisitor related support services and uses along with the infrastructure needed to support such growth It is the intent of the City through adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to provide a comprehensive long term plan that supports development ofvisitor serving uses whileaddressing the potential impacts ofthis type of development within the context of the Anaheim Resort To achieve this the proposed Specific Plan establishes goals objectives and policies for the planning area as well as permitted land uses development densities standards and design guidelines for the systematic implementation of the General Plan for the area The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is intended to provide guidance and consistency for future development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries Although adoption ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would not directly result in development impacts future implementation of the Specific Plan Le infrastructure development and individual development proposals being guided and directed by the Specific Plan could result in impacts from development within the Specific Plan area Potential environmental impacts of this nature Le impacts resulting from the implementation of a plan or program constitute a Project as defined by CEQA guidelines When future developments are proposed within the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan the City of Anaheim will examine developments in light of this EIR to determine what additional environmental documentation must be prepared Developments which do not require additional discretionary review will not be subject to any additional environmental documenwion However the property owner developer will be required to submit documentation substantiating said development is allowed and in conformance with the Specific Plan and that their environmental effects are within the parameters and timeframe year 2010 analyzed within this EIR This EIR includes adescription ofthe proposed project the actions required for project approval and an evaluation of the environmental impacts anticipated upon implemenWion of the project Le infrastructure implemenwion and future development proposals guided by the Specific Plan Where applicable this EIR incorporates by reference the technical analysis prepared for the Disneyland Resort EIR No 311 SCH No 9IOSIOSS All volumes of The Disneyland Resort EIR are available for review at the Planning Department ofthe City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim California CRAlCRA Z 2 10 Project Description 01461 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific PlmI 2 4 1 Comoonents of the Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan As required by Chapter 18 93 Specific Plan of the Anaheim Municipal Code and California Government Code Sections 65450 through 65457 et seq the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan document includes text and diagrams which specify the following in detail The nature location density and size of all existing and proposed land uses Vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the project and surrounding area The provision ofessential urban services including but not limited to public safety public utilities recreation and similar services as may be required by the proposed development Peninent land use regulations for implementation of the specific plan including supponing justification for any development standards or procedures which deviate from existing City zoning and land use regulations A discussion ofthe proposed Specific Plan s consistency with the provisions ofthe General Plan Chapter 18 93 also requires a development schedule setting forth phasing of development and target dates for completion Development of the planning area will likely be spread over a number of years as individual landowners renovate their propeny or replace existing buildings with new ones This EIR however assumed thresholds for modeling purposes at year 2000 1 000 additional hotel rooms and 2010 buildout Infrastructure will be provided commensurate with development In addition the specific plan contains detailed proposals for urban design improvements to be implemented as pan of development of the project area The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan is divided into 10 sections Section 10 the Executive Summary is a brief overview of the proposed plan Section 2 0 the Project Context discusses the purpose of the Specific Plan the City planning policies that affect development of the Specific Plan area the authority and scope ofthe Specific Plan and its relationship to othertity planning documents Section 3 0 contains the Land Use Plan and describes existing land uses and conditions within the Specific Plan area and describes the proposed land uses and development densities Section 4 0 contains the Public Facilities Plan In Section 5 0 the Design Plan establishes the design criteria for the Specific Plan area Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency describes how the Specific Plan is consistent with the City s General Plan Section 7 0 contains the detailed Zoning and Development Standards that will control development within the Specific Plan area Section 8 0 compares the development standards contained in the Plan to existing City regulations Section 9 0 contains a legal description ofthe Specific Plan area Section 10 contains General Plan Amendment No 333 which is proposed for adoption prior to approval of the Specific Plan CRAlCRA 2 2 11 01462 Project ---PAGE BREAK--- J J 01 1 I j l a iJ Ii i 1 I i 1 1 1 I I c l Ii I 1 I m i I OtefoA t EJ Limit ofAnaheim Resort t I Designated Future Alignment in General Plan Circuladon Element c J CR Oimia Oevdopment Ar l PR Oimia Devdopment Area 2 Mobilehome Park MHP Ovctlay Zone Central Cote Legend Source imA 3116 94 Michxl8randnwIAs ocims 00550010 694 e 1 1 i KatelQAvenueoligrmenf inconnec1lonWfl n1 j t6 fIor 4 D i nprovementa e o lCOJ 20Cll feel IIIllIIII 0 2 12 Exhibit 2 3a Development Summary Pla Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e ee e A l all l 1onl o ay o Qd p c L l Vl L J L 1 I r i r 1 I i I Cem O Avenue J I j H Ii g I u I ol Q o r I i g ii I l I h I 0 Gr1l i I olello Avenue ol9nment in connection wIth I widening see S8ellon 0 otthe SpeClnc Plan c lOCumenlor orner 16 r r I i i i Pocd lcoAvenue I it a Legend l2J II o 1000 2000 feet Mobilehome l 2rk MHP Overlay Zone within the C R District Central Core IIIIIIIII Limit ofAnaheim Resort I2SJ E3 Designated in General Plan Circulation Element In onn tion with Th Dinuy d 10 Spin PI4n Ct1Titos AIItn is R neJ to b Tto ua 000 ro 00fm nonhmJ ana aponion of Wlsr Smn is piAnro a cul tk 1M Wtsr PIac j 1 Designated for Future Extension in General Plan Circuladon Element C R District Developmenr Area I c PR District Development Area 2 Source SWA August 1994 II ich 1 Assoo l Exhibit 2 3a Development Summary Plan Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area EIR 005500 0 8 94 ---PAGE BREAK--- umi ofAnaheim Resort Designated Future Alignment in Genml Plan Circularion E1emen Designated for Funue Extension in Genml Plan Circub ion Low Densil Up 0 50 Hold RoomsGross Acre or 75 rooms whicheo uis grea LowMedium Densil Up ID 75 HCHeI RoomsIGross Acre or75 rooms whichis greater Medium Densil Up ID 100 HOld RoomsIGross Acre or 75 roonu whichis grea CooDon Center Medium Up ID 125 HOld RoomsGross Acre or75 roonu whichis greater Ccrritos Avmue wiD be rdoatcd 1 000 Q UWith environmental impacts mitigated to 1100 feet northerly a portion ofWcs Sum he level of 100 oonu per will become a cul Je laC West Place Legend rf 1 K1 r j I f VO r L 1 1 I Xi LLj I i I lrJ C mo A if Iii ill f I ii t 1 ii c 1 i d v 6 1 lJ i l i 1 W 0J I i l KQ 1 l u fll I YIr rf ZZZ 1 I iU r L 1 I L L iU I Ii ii It J j L 1ULL orano V ItItIIlL 1 if o 1 0 2CXX reet Sourc SWAt June 1994 Exhibit 2 3b C R District Development Density Plan Maximum Hotel Room Density Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR m1 Michael Brandman Associa cs 005500 0 694 2 3 01465 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e 00 VB 1Ont I e i R c O Od C L10 J oT F 7 1 7 t i 1 jC It F on W Kol IIo m Ii U ri l l i KO 1 SS nt rz fA p e s0 t i i o Cerrttos Legend I2SJ E3 CJ Limit ofAnaheim Resort Designated ror Furore Extension in GcnenlPlan Circulation Element Low Density Up to 50 Hotel Roomsl Gross Aac or 7S rooms whichever is greater Low Medium Density Up to 75 Hotel Roomsl Gross kre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Medium Density Up to 100 Hotel Rooms Gross Acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater SOurce SWA August lQQ4 m J ichacl Brandman A ssocl1lCS 00550010 8 94 ImIlIIII o 1000 2000 feet Convention Center Medium Up to 125 Hotel Rooms Gross Acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Tht mp c ti t ofUn houV Urooms sh4i bt minIma UI 1M tquiwUnu ofJ rooms aor Designated Future Alignment in General Plan Circulation Element III rh nJ SP ific Pl is p1411III IN rrloultti J 0 10 J 100 fin 1Imhm IInJ IIporm1l ofWm Smn is P 1Ilfni 10 bm1fV I ahU1U Jt PLut Exhibit 2 3b C R District Development Plan Maximum Hotel Room Density Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- A7Ulheim Reson Specific Plan Land Use Plan The primary purpose of the Land Use Plan is to describe the land uses permitted within the Specific Plan area and the maximum permitted development density Section 7 Zoning and Development Standards ofthe Specific Plan document contains specific detailed development standards which will apply to development In the CoR District Development Area I restaurants hotels motels and other related facilities will be permitted uses refer to Exhibit 2 3ab In addition many service and retail businesses which accommodate visitors such as barber or beauty shops travel agencies automobile rental agencies and specialty retail shops will also be permitted when integrated within a hotel motel development Those uses which are consistent with the overall intent of the Plan but which may require special consideration in order to assure compatibility with surrounding uses such as dinner theaters will require conditional use permits There are two propenies in the southern ponion and one in the northern ponion of the CoR District approximately 315 acres which currently have a Mobilehome Park Overlay zone designation The MHP Overlay requirements which are set forth in Chapter 18 92 of the Anaheim Municipal Code provide development standards for mobilehome parks The Mobilehome Park MHP Overlay which encompasses existing mobilehome parks within the CoR District and provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations and procedures to mitigate relocation problems and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when a park is convened to another land use This designation will continue for said parcels under this Specific Plan In the PR District Development Area 2 City owned uses such as Convention Center complexes and parking facilities are allowed as well as the existing 1 600room Anaheim Hilton Hotel which is currently zoned PR Public Recreational Other related visitor serving uses allowed in the District as accessory uses are concession stands restaurants and shops Kepl pr r th J d 11 s The Phm eUJli3kes apl 8M dill se el tIl d 8Ie 8 dIMity sf SRI sf the primary YMesded Y tunels asEt IRstels 88d their RaslBle lIIes The Pl esmhliahes Will ho l Acnsit 6V withiR the C R OisSfiet sfth aim Rne ipeeifie PI bell 9 BSity whieh peflBits heteb aM 11I9t II tQ ltllo t lIRUR UR gf 50 rg91R1 P JNB8 18M Sf 75 rse ahiehe er is Ifuter Low eElitlm De8Bi Rieh eFlBits a Mill nUB ef7J Fe81B1 81 Jf811 ere Sf 7S r88111S hiehe er is greater te liYJB Qel1liy a MiRna af 100 rea8ll per 8M aere9 er 75 f861M9 wkieht u i1 greater and CSR eAtisa CAlMer cq I IB I Jtimum sf IJ 19811II with trip generation lftitig feEI tEl tile le el ef 199 f881M per IflJS aere 8r 1S f63ft1S hh h n J n 4h HI b CRAlCRA 2 2 14 Project Description 01467 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e ee e Replacement for Page 214 5th paragraph The Specific Plan establishes four density designations within the CoR District These designations are based upon hotel mntel development and allow up to 20 ofeach hotelmotel project gross square footage excluding parking facilities to be developed with integrated i e included within the main hotelmotel complex accessory uses These accessory uses will reduce theotherwise maximum permitted hotelmntel density at the rate of one hotel motel room per six hundred 600 gross square feet ofaccessory use For properties proposed to bedeveloped with permitted and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels motels with accessory uses the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotelmotel including accessory uses density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to FInal Site Plan review and approval FoUowing are the four density designations Low Density which permits hotels and motels to have a maximum of 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Low Medium Density which permits a maximum of75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Medium Density a maximum of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Medium Density a maximum of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater and Convention Center CC Medium a maximum of 125 rooms with trip generation characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre or75 rooms whichever is greater ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan 29 perseR sf the A9wl m9wl prejettt tetlll square restage exehuliag parkiag faeilities fIlay Be Ele eted t8 iRtegrated ytlf Glii8ES917 lses will feEhlee the ethefwhe IflMiffitlffi ermitteEI hote Jmotel ae83itj at the fate sf eRe Iletelmgtel realR per 00 IHlyartf aet p r CiUgr lie The location and boundaries of each area designated with a maximum development density is based on a combination of factors including access to and capacity of major transportation facilities especially 1 5 proximity to major Anaheim Resort attractions such as the Anaheim Convention Center or the existing and proposed theme parks and distance to neighboring residential areas Areas immediately adjacent to the Anaheim Convention Center have the Convention Center CC Medium designation in recognition that guests at these hotels typically do not have automobiles and therefore place fewer demands on area streets one of the most important infrastructure factors that can limit development density The assumptions for the land use plan are based on the ability of the infrastructUre including street storm drain sewer water and electrical capacities etc to accommodate the maximum allowed density proposed for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Generally areas closest to major attractions and areas that have efficient transportation facilities with adequate capacity permit higher development intensities than areas that have less convenient transportation access or capacity or which might be neighboring to a residential use on the edge of the Anaheim Resort Table 2 3 1 1 summarizes the maximum potential development of hotels and motels within the CoR District Approximately 15 1 acres of the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan area are designated for future 1 5 right of way Until such time as this land is acquired M lIired by Caltrans it will be subject to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone CoR District and the density designations summarized in Table 2 3 1 1 The PR District encompasses 62 8 acres including the 1 600room Anaheim Hilton Hotel This District does not have a density designation however it has been analyzed in this EIR for the impacts associated with the construction of up to 412 additional rooms based upon 125 rooms per acre mitigated to a level of 100 roomsacre for 16 1 acres including the 8 6acre Anaheim Hilton Hotel and 7 5 acres of Anaheim Convention Center property Between the CoR and PR Districts this EIR analyzes the impacts ohtotal of 27 508 rooms 16 318 over the existing Dumber of rooms for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan In recognition of the extensive existing development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area the Plan contains provisions that permit existing botels motels to renovate or rebuild at the density existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan even if the current density exceeds the maximum density that would be permitted by the density category in wbicb the property is located 0469 CRAlCRA 2 2 15 Project Description e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e e TABLE 2 31 1 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL HOTEL DEVELOPMENT FOR TIlE CoR DISTRICT e Density Maximum Approximate Existing Hotell Maximum Hotel Designation Density Acres Motel Rooms Motel Rooms Low Up to 50 rooms 714 1 926 3 777 acre Low Medium Up to 75 rooms 1716 4 523 12 873 acre Medium Up to 100 19 2 422 1 920 rooms acre Convention Up to 125 55 4 2719 6 926 Center CC rooms acre Medium Total 317 6 9 590 25 496 Summary of Densitv Designations for the 1 5 Widening Right of Wav Area Low Up to 50 rooms 3 8 190 acre Low Medium Up to 75 rooms 7 7 579 acre Medium Up to 100 3 6 360 rooms acre Total 15 1 1 129 The maximum density for each lot or parcel is the number of hotel motel rooms acre noted in this table or 75 rooms per lotparcel existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan whichever is greater For parcels that are developed with hotel or motel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density Due to the enhanced ultimate right of way required by adopted General Plan Amendment No 331 for Harbor Boulevard 12 feet Katella Avenue 23 feet Freedman Way 115 feet and West StreetlDisneyland Drive north of Ball Road 10 feet and between Cerritos Avenue and Catella Avenue 2 5 feet to implement the public realm streetscape program properties along these streets may include the additional right of way widths in their property acreage when computing density b The maximum number of hotellmotel rooms includes the existing S07 room Pan Pacific Hotel The trip generation characteristics of these hotel motel rooms shall be mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per acre Source SWA 1994 e e e e e ee CIlAJCRA 2 2 16 Project Description 01470 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Also in recognition of the importance of the Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue corridors to the identity of the entire Anaheim Resort the Plan establishes special standards and guidelines for the central portion of the Anaheim Resort identified as the Central Core The limits of this area include the parcels abutting Harbor Boulevard between 1 5 and Orangewood Avenue and abutting Katella Avenue between Haster StreetAnaheim Boulevard and Walnut Street The Central Core standards and guidelines apply to the area between the ultimate public right Qf way and the actual building setback Public Facilities Plan The Public Facilities Plan contains a description of the proposed infrastructure improvements and public services which will be necessary to accommodate the development proposed in the land use portion of the Specific Plan as well as related improvements associated with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan It includes a description of circulation system improvements water sewer and stonn drain improvements gas electric telephone and communication system improvements and public services such as police and fire SYf A necessary to service the area The circulation system component of the Public Facilities Plan includes sections which address vehicular circulation mass transit and pedestrian circulation The plan proposes major improvements to the vehicular circulation system including the widening of major streets improvements for important intersections and provision for adequate right Qf way to accommodate proposed urban design features such as landscaping The mass transit component accommodates both future improvements such as the proposed Orange County Fixed Guideway which will connect the mllior cities in Orange County as well as improvements within the Anaheim Resort intended to enhance access to the existing and planned Disneyland theme park s and Anaheim Convention Center The local improvements include provision for a sbuUle bus system that will efficiently ITansport people between the area s botels and attractions as well as systems intended to provide access from the public parking facilities to the theme parks and convention centers which is described in more detail in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and EIR The pedestrian circulation plan identifies the location of major pedestrian routes which will be enhanced in connection with the proposed Anaheim Resort LandscapelStreetscape program The plans for the water sewer and storm drain systems include provisions for improvements which will add to the capacity of these systems so that they can accommodate the future growth and development of the Anaheim Resort Water system improvements include replacement of some existing water lines with larger ones as well as the addition of new lines to use water produced by 01471 CRAlCRA 2 2 17 Project Description e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e e a new well located within the Anaheim Resort Similarly both the sewer and storm drain plans describe and locate new lines which will supplement or replace existing facilities e Gas telephone cable television and electrical service to the planning area will be gradually upgraded as the area infrastructure is improved The plan recognizes the importance of these improvements to the long term success of the Anaheim Resort and accommodates them by identifying improvements that will be coordinated where possible with other infrastructure construction Public services such as fire and police protection are also addressed in the plan e Sift e the Speeifie Pie gees Ret pFepeS8 any Hew Q8 919pIR8At withiA the plaraiag area he location and timing of new hotels restaurants and other privately developed uses cannot be precisely established This EIR has however assumed thresholds for modeling purposes at year 2000 and 2010 Infrastructure improvements will be required commensurate with development e Based on the anticipated development ofregional infrastructure and the adopted phasing plan for Th Disneyland Resort it is possible however to describe an anticipated schedule for improvements within the planning area The major improvements in the area which are likely to affect the construction of infrastructure are the proposed widening of 1 5 construction of Phase I of The Disneyland Resort and development of the other related projects within the study area refer to Section 4 0 Table 41 These actions are anticipated to be complete by the year 2000 and are associated with a number of improvements which will act Ommodate development within the planning area Among the improvements to infrastructure anticipated as a result of these projects are improvement of 1 5 interchanges at West Street Harbor Boulevard and Katella AvenueIFreedmanWay widening ofsome streets and the improvement of some intersections water sewer and storm drain improvements needed to support these projects improvement of other infrastructure such as electrical capacity gas line replacement etc and the provision of public services of police officers and firefi ting personnel These enhancements wbich were analyzed and described in detail in The Disneyland Resort Draft Environmental Impact Report Section 3 0 are also set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program No 0067 and Specific Plan SP 92 1 and bave been previously environmentally cleared These documents are available for review at the City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 S Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim California e e e After the year 2000 development of additional infrastructure would correspond or precede buildout of the Anaheim Resort assumed to occur by the year 2010 For project analysis the assumption was made that by the year 2010 an additional 16 318 botel rooms would be built Refer to Section 14 Methodology for project analysis The estimate ofthe total number ofrooms assumes that by 2010 approximately 100 percent of the allowed density will be developed Infrastructure improvement ee 2 18 Project Description CRAJCRA2 01472 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan projects that are anticipated to be complete by 2010 are factored into the analysis such that the infrastructure capacity is balanced with projected growth for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to the year 2010 An important aspect of phasing is the coordination of infrastructure construction so that disruption to adjacent landowners will be minimized This may result in certain improvements being installed in advance of their actual need or other developments being delayed until associated improvements can be installed Design Plan The Design Plan contains a description of the design features and development guidelines intended to create an overall identity for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and which will improve the visual quality of the area s development The Design Plan establishes the Objectives and concepts which will achieve this goal and contains a Landscape Concept Plan and Comprehensive Identity Program for the entire Anaheim Resort which show how the Plan s objectives will be realized In order to better define the responsibilities of the private landowners for implementing the Design Plan it divides the planning area into three areas the Public Realm which generally includes the area ofthe public right of way the Setback Realm whicb includes the area between the street rigbt of way and the minimum required building setback and the Private Realm wbicb includes the remainder ofthe privately owned land within the planning area The primary objectives ofthe Design Plan are to create a consistent identity for the Anaheim Resort and create a bigb quality visually appealing pedestrian environment In order to achieve these objectives the plan sets forth guidelines to transform the entire area with landscape that bas a pedestrian scale and is expressed on the area s streets Landscape will also be used to differentiate one area from another so that visitors will be better oriented The plan recognizes that the Central Core will require different desip standards than the peripbery The plan also recommends that a clear bierarchy beestablisbed wbich places primary empbasis on implementing the plan relative to the public streets fint followed by the setbacks adjacent to the streets and finally within individual project development areas The plan describes bow these conceptS will be realized by describing in detail the three areas wbich express the desip bierarchy the Public Realm Setback Realm and Private Realm Standards for the Publ ic Realm incorporate material from the Landscape Plan and Identity Program and describe in detail the improvements to be made within the public right of way The standards for the Setback Realm are more flexible in order to accommodate the variety of conditions wbich exist within the area CRAlCRA 2 2 19 01473 Project Description e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e e between the public right Qf way and the minimum building setback line but are definitive enough to ensure compatibility with the overall landscape and identity concepts The standards and guidelines for the Private Realm ensure the high quality design in site planning building design landscape sign and lighting design within future developments that will contribute to the overall impression of the Anaheim Resort as a high quality destination resort while permitting flexibility to ensure maximum usability of individual parcels Zoning and Development Standards The Zoning and Development Standards section of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan contains the regulations which will be applied to all development within the planning area This section will replace and supersede the zoning regulations contained within the current C R Zone Chapter 18 48 of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code The regulations contained in this section govern land use and provide specific development standards intended to implement the policies and concepts described in the other sections of the Specific Plan e Land uses fall into four categories permitted primary uses permitted accessory uses conditional uses and prohibited uses Permitted primary uses are allowed as of right and accessory uses are allowed as long as they are developed in conjunction with aprimary permitted use Conditional uses are also permitted subject to the review and approval by the City at a noticed public hearing s e Development standards regulate development intensity building height mass and setbacks They also regulate landscape design parking area design and other elements of a development project to ensure overall conformity with the policies described in the Specific Plan 1 5 INTENDED USIlS OF THE RIll RESPONSIBLE AGENCIF 1 AND DISCRETIONARY AcnONS e The EIR is being prepared by the City of Anaheim to assess the potential environmental impacts that may arise in connection with actions related to future implementation ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The City of Anaheim is the lead agency for the project and has discretionary authority over the project and project approvals It is the intent of the City to permit all public infrastructure improvements and all future developments that are within the timeframes and parameters established and analyzed in sufficient detail within the framework of this EIR to proceed without further environmental analysis In addition to the currently proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan other future approvals by the City may be required for the implemenwion of the Specific Plan Such discretionary actions include a General Plan Amendment to maintain consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan the processing ofconditional use permits Final Site Plans adoption ofthe e ee CRAJCRA 1 2 20 Project Description 01474 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Anaheim Resort Identity Program and future environmental review as required Infrastructure financing and maintenance programs and other actions necessary to implement the Specific Plan as identified in Section 2J3 Other Discretionary and Ministerial Actions could also occur This EIR will be the primary reference document in the formulation and implementation of a mitigation monitoring report or monitoring program for the project as is required by Section 210816 of the Public Resources Code refer to Section 1 6 of this document The City of Anaheim is the lead agency for the project and has the principal discretionary authority over the project approvals These include the following 2 5 1 CITY OF ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2 5 1 1 SlIDII1l8ry or General Plan Amendment General Plan Amendment No 333 is proposed to amend the City ofAnaheim General Plan Land Use C l C IIiL oCl ami CinlltatieR Environmental Resource and Management Elements in connection with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project This section describes the proposed amendment According to California Government Code Section 65450 no specific plan may beadopted unless the proposed plan is consistent with the general plan Therefore the amendment proposed in this section must be adopted by the City prior to adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The Specific Plan implements the Commercial Recreation General Plan designation 2 5 1 2 Land Use FJement The City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element designates the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area for Commercial Recreation land uses The proposed amendment would add text to the General Plan Land Use Element recognizing that tile Anaheim Resort Specific Plan in addition to The Disneyland Resort and tile PR Public Recreational Zone implements the Commercial Recreation land use designation and establishes maximum development density designations should the pending Hotel Circle Specific Plan be adopted text will be added to tIIis section recognizing that the Hotel Circle Specific Plan is also an implementing zone for tIIis land use designation for the CoR District Commercial RecreationThe Commercial Recreation category was adopted by the City in the 19605 to encourage commercial recreation land uses primarily in the Anaheim Convention CenterlDisneyland area currently lef lIed to as the approximate 1 046acre Anaheim Resort and in the area around the Anaheim Stadium For tile Anaheim Resort the Commercial Recreation category is implemented by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan CRAlCRA2 2 21 Project Description e e It ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e e and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan For the area around the Anaheim Stadium this category is implemented by the PR Public Recreational Zone e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of approximately 549 5 acres within two land use Districts and a Mobilehome Park Overlay the CoR Commercial Recreation District which allows for hotels motels convention and conference facilities as well as restaurants retail shops and entertainment facilities the PR Public Recreation District which encompasses the Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities and provides for the orderly use of City owned property as well as the existing 1 600 room Anaheim Hilton Hotel and the Mobilehome Park MHP Overlay which encompasses existing mobilehome parks within the CoR District and provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations and procedures to mitigate relocation problems and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when a park is converted to another land use Ate ADaR8im Rts8Ft 5poaifie riM ab ies Lu J de 8 gpm At c ncity CiVUltinne f9f kiJttluauh 1 d n lvll m ul iu mliO C R ryJAtt IM Distrit l ke foliC EleB5i ltqoritfi estalilisRld by me Plm arc l vw B ltIit whidi IA4J d 1186 a mHift deMi oftl to 56 lUUU Y Ifaas aere Of 15 rSBIBI waisk w is 1h s P y Lv1 t1 I lUl D LU t I I YlIt j5 l AJUWFl 51V I or S realBl l aisl18V er is j tfr M xUynl E Wt tip to 199 rooms per If031 aet e o 1S x hi ia peater 8ftEl CeWI8RtieA r CO MediHIB DeBSi HP te 125 fBeBJI per FOss aere wilh l 6GMcatieft miHlatcd to the k d of 199 88 per FQIS reams whi he c i5 A For those parcels developed with hotel motel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density IB 8SI9 VIM B 1 Ix dc dOanA tt1uLl6 tb th hut dliwU 1 as well II om1 i itor Iwd e8 8fsiaIJrltail IRd us e e e The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an approximate 489 7 acre international multi day vacation destination resort iDcluding ongoing modifications to the Disneyland theme park the development of a new theme park additional hotels and entert in nt areas administrative office facilities new public and private parking facilities and an internal transportation 5ystem This development is within five planning Districts Theme Park Hotel Parking Future ExpaDsion and District A and a CoR Overlay which allows development within the Overlay to either be is w1 e Resort District or subject to the same land uses as in the JK tbi15fjiliyratReiOii Specific Plan also identifies maximum development dellSity designations for hotel motel development in the Hotel District up to 5 600 hotel roomsfor the entire District with up to 1 000 hotelmotel rooms transferableto the Theme Park District in District A the maximum number of units permitted would be 75 hotel motel rooms per gross acre or 75 hotel motel roomsper parcel existing on JUlIe 29 1993 whichever is greater and the CoR Overlay the maximum number of unitspermitted on a parcel would be the following I for parcels desiJDaled Low Density 11p to SO hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever greater and 2 for parcels desiJDaled Medium Density up to 75 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater provided that for those parcels that are developed with hotel motel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing dellSity It should be noted that IIC Ssory uses may be developed as well as e e ee 2 22 Project Ducription ClAlCRA2 01476 ---PAGE BREAK--- Replacement for Page 2 22 2nd paragraph 2nd and 3rd sentences The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan also establishes four density designations within the C R District These designations are based upon botelmotel development and allow up to 20 of eacb botel motel project gross square footage excluding parking facilities to be developed with integrated ie included within the main hotel motel complex accessory uses These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted botelmotel density at the rate of one botelmotel room per six hundred 600 gross square feet of accessory use For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels motels with accessory uses the traffic generation characteristics of said uses sball notexceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel motel includiDg accessory uses density as determined by tbe City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval FoUowing are the four density designations Low Density which permits hotels and motels to have a maximum of 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Low Medium Density which permits a maximum of 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Medium Density a maximum of 100 tooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Medium Density a maximum of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater and Convention Center CC Medium a maximum of 125 rooms with trip generation characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater e e e 014n ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan other visitor serving commercial retail and restaurant uses along with these hotelmotel uses e The amendment also proposes to upgrade the water 8Ild eleslrisaI distril R system maps and amend the storm drain and sewer maps to reflect the improvements described in Section 3 9 Public Services and Utilities of this EIR and Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan of the Specific Plan Volume n Appendix B 5 1 3 Circulation Element e In connection with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan a few upgrades and modifications to the circulation system are proposed The following text describes the proposed amendments e Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue Clementine Street is proposed to be redesignated from a Secondary Arterial Highway 4Ianes 9Ofoot right of way to a Modified Secondary Arterial Highway 4 lanes 87 foot right ilf way designation Convention Way between Harbor Boulevard and approximately 1 450 feet west of Harbor Boulevard Convention Way is proposed to be redesignated from a Primary Arterial Highway 6 lanes l06foot right ilf way to a Modified Primary Arterial Highway 6 lanes lIofoot right ilf way designation e Pacifico Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street Pacifico Avenue is proposed to be redesignated from a Major Arterial Highway 6 lanes 120foot right ilf way to a Modified Primary Arterial HiJbway 6 lanes Ilofoot right ilf way designation e Manchester Avenue para1le1inl the 1 5 east ofHarbor Boulevard to lIOrth of Alro Way Manchester Avenue is proposed to be redesignated from a Secondary Arterial Highway 4 lanes 9Ofoot ri ht ilf way to a Modified Secondary Arteria1 Highway 4 lanes 67 foot ri ht ilfway deaignation ee Manchester Avenue south of the portion the intenection of F Iman Way 4 l is propoaed to be redesignated from a Secondary of way to a Modified Secondary Arterial HiJbway Critical Intenec tion Clarification Text is proposed to be added to the Circulation Element c1arifyin that the Critical IDtenec tion desian for Conveation WaylHarbor Boulevard Harbor BouIevardlKatella Avenue Haster Street noilD BoulevardlKatella Avenue and Pacifico AvenuelHaster Street also includes the Anaheim Resort relJ street parkwayssidewalks as well as required throup ttavell left turD lanes jht tum ilnly lane a in lII dilll aad buS tlIRIBlISI The Anaheim Resort street e 2 23 Project Description CRAlCRA2 e 014 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan parkway sidewalk designs are identified in The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program 2 5 14 Environmental Resource and Man8lement Element The General Plan Environmental Resource and Management Element designated 58 0 acres southeast of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard as an Agricultural Preserve Currently this property which is actually 56 acres as opposed to the acreage designated in the General Plan is subject to a California Land Conservation Act the Williamson Act contract A notice of nonrenewal notice has been filed and the contract will expire on March I 2000 In recognition of this pending expiration date and in order for the property to be developed with uses consistent with the Commercial Recreation Land Use designation following the contract expiration the proposed General Plan Amendment will eliminate the Agricultural Preserve designation from the General Plan Itshould also be noted that there is an inadvertent error on the existing Environmental Resource and Management Open SpaceConservation Map It currently shows Agriculture Preserve Area on the northern portion of The Disneyland Resort whereas the Agriculture Preserve Area is actually on the southeastern portion of the District This General Plan Amendment will remove the Agriculture Preserve Area entirely from the CoR District Agricultural uses however will remain a permitted use in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan CoR District 2 5 2 SPECIFIC PLAN ADOP110N The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan includes specific zoning and site development standards design guidelines and a Public Facilities Plan The zoning designation for the properties within the adopted project area would be redesignated to Specific Plan No 92 2 2 5 3 OTHER DISCRETIONARY AND MINISTERIAL AcrIONS The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and Anaheim Resort Nonconforming Sign Program are proposed to be considered with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The project may also require the following approvals by the City of Anaheim financing mechanismsagreements abandonment of streets or subsurface rights buUding permits demolition permits grading permits encroachment permits property acquisition which may involve the exercise of eminent domain for roadway and intersection improvements and for l ntIOiIpe easements for other utilities andor landscaping and other public infrastructUre and other actions related to the implementation of the Specific Plan CIlAICRA 2 2 24 Project Description U14 e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Other agencies with discretionary authority over some aspect ofthe project are defined in CEQA as responsible agencies Section 15381 of the State CEQA Guidelines Such agencies may also use this EIR in their consideration of the project These agencies include but are not limited to California Department of Transponation Caltrans Orange County Environmental Management Agency Orange County Health Department Orange County Transponation Authority Regional Water Quality Control Board South Coast Air Quality Management District Southern California Association of Governments Ul4fW CRAlCRA 2 2 25 Project ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR SECTION 3 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES AND SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS Section 3 0 analyzes the project s environmental impacts for the following issues land use transportation air quality noise earth resources hydrology socioeconomics public services and utilities hazardous materials aesthetics cultural resources and energy The environmental conditions are described for each issue Impacts to the environment which would be caused by implementation of the Specific Plan are discussed Mitigation measures are described which will reduce the impact of the project on the environment This EIR incorporates both standard mitigation measures which the City of Anaheim applies uniformly to projects within its jurisdiction and additional mitigation measures which are designed to mitigate specific impacts associated with implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The last element addresses each issue area for significant unavoidable adverse impacts This describes any impacts that cannot be avoided or lessened with mitigation measures to a level that is less than significant The property owner developer shall implement all mitigation measures in this section of the EIR or their environmental equivalent Environmental equivalent shall mean any mitigation measure and timing thereof subject to the approval of the City which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment The Planning Department in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments shall determine the adequacy of any proposed environmental equivalenttiming and if determined necessary may refer said determination to the Planning Commission Any costs associated with information or environmental documentation required in order to make a determination ofenvironmental equivalency timing shall be borne by the property owner developer The City will ensure compliaIK ethrough the mitigation monitoring process 3 1 LAND lJSE RIlI TIm PLANS AND POLICIRCl Land use issues addressed in this section include the related plans and policies governing existing and future conditions in the Specific Plan area Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility provides an analysis of the existing and future physical land use conditions such as density height and bulk and the potential conversion of existing uses Cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 4 0 CRAlCRA 3 I 3 1 Land Use ReloJed Plans and Policies 01481 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS e Several local and regional plans and programs apply to or are currently being prepared to apply to development in and around the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Table 3 1 1 Related Plans and Policies lists the related plans and policies analyzed in this EIR These include elements of the City of Anaheim General Plan The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan elements and policies of transportation plans for the County of Orange and the County s Congestion Management Plan and regional plans such as the Air Quality Management Plan Growth Management Plan Regional Mobility Plan and various other transportation plans These documents are incorporated by reference into this document The following discussion identifies these plans and policies e e An analysis of the project s consistency with the objectives goals and policies of the City of Anaheim s General Plan is provided in Section 6 0 of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan herein incorporated by reference This EIR also addresses the project s conformity to the General Plan Portions ofthe documents addressed in this section ofthe EIR are in draft form Attempts have been made to include currently available data in this EIR to reflect as completely as possible future conditions The environmental issues addressed by these plans are discussed in other sections of this EIR 3 1 1 City of Anaheim PlanniIl2 Pro2rams e City of Anaheim aIPlan e Adopted in 1963 and comprehensively amended in 1984 the Anaheim General Plan establishes guidelines for future development and redevelopment within the City The General Plan includes the following elements which are discussed in this section Land Use Circulation Environmental Resource and MlIIIlIgement Noise Housing Parks Recreation and Community Services and Growth Management e The General Plan covers the approximate 48 68 square mile City which is divided into two major planning areas The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is located in Planning Area A which consists primarily of the urbanized area of the City west of the Santa Ana River Planning Area B consists ofdeveloped and undeveloped portions ofthe hill and canyon area of Anaheim east of the intersection of State Route 91 and Stale Route 55 The following describes some of the relevant aspects of the Anaheim General Plan ee CRAlCIl A 3 I 3 1 2 01482 Land Use Rewed Plans and Policies ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR TABLE 3 1 1 RELATED PLANS AND POLICIES City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element Circulation Element Envirorunental Resource and Management Element Parks Recreation and Community Services Element Noise Element Housing Element Growth Management Element City of Anaheim Zoning Ordinance City of Anaheim Housing Assistance Programs Affordable Rental Programs Affordable Homeownersbip Programs The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan Utility Underground Conversion Program South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area Anaheim Transportation Plans IIII i IIII I 1I1il JI irtIIIJI11 III iI11Ii 11111111111111 N Orange County Planning Programs Master Plan of Arterial Highways Orange County Congestion Management Program Orange County Transportation Authority OCTA South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD Southern California Association of Governments SCAG Regional Planning Programs 1991 Air Quality Management Plan ReJjonal Mobility Plan Growth Management Plan r I f @rlll j lf rl fY California Deputment of Transportation Caltrans Interstate S Widening Project Orange County Transportation Planning Projects Katella Avenue Sman Street Project Harbor Boulevard Sman Street Project Central Orange County Fixed Guideway Project JJJ iiiii1iii ww W Land Use Related PImu and Policies CRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 3 e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Additionally the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides an analysis of the project s implementation of the objectives goals and policies of the General Plan see Section 6 0 of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan for additional discussion of General Plan goals objectives and policies related to the proposed project e Land Use Element e Exhibit 3 shows the General Plan land use designations for the project area and surrounding areas All ofthe parcels located within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are designated as Commercial Recreation in the Land Use Element of the General Plan The Commercial Recreation land use category is intended to provide for the development ofbusinesses directly related to the recreation and entertainment industries that provide services to visitors and tourists A discussion of existing land uses and zoning is included in Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility e Goals for commercial development set forth in the Land Use Element include meeting the continuing needs and demands ofthe community for commercial goods and services increasing sales tax yields and enhancing the economic base of the community and maintaining and enhancing the position of Anaheim as a nationally recognized tourist center Two of the Land Use Element policies directly related to development in the Commercial Recreation designated area are as follows Encourage the development of quality facilities which complement conventions family entertainment and recreation within appropriate areas of the community e Maintain the integrity of the Commercial Recreation Area now referred to as the Anaheim Reson by permitting only compatible land uses within this designated area e Additional goals and policies regarding development in the area are included in the Specific Plan Section 2 0 e Areas to the nonb northeast west and south of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are designated Low Density Residential 6 dwelling units per acre Medium Density Residential 036 dwelling units per acre Commercial Professional and General Commercial The area east ofthe Specific Plan area isdesignated Low and Medium Density Residential Commercial Professional General Industrial and Business OfficelServicelIndustrial ee 0484 CRAlCRA 3 1 3 Land Use Related PlanJ and Polides e ---PAGE BREAK--- s 0 01 v 0 i V s N i i f 1 I I I l I 1 t L h to 1 W O I rl 11 i L ij I il C li I 1 oi 77 D I r r i ib I R U I 1 Jots f l 1 i IfF r HL DL LLll rn Tf Ll 1 F J 77itb I o L A T r I i y t3 v Z TIH i I T TJfT J L 1 L r I 1 I I j i I I UL i J Ii 1000 0 Legend Spcci6c Pbn j1 Anahoim Raort Anahoim Raon Boundary CommaciaJ Pro ssionaI lBIICommaciaJ Gmml c J Commeral Recreational sm G nenlIndUlai d I7777 A Low Ocnsil Raiden w w ffB Medium Ocnsil Raidcn School Si E E1emenwy lIB BUSiness l s SWA Jun 1994 SOUfft AmOatcs r IWJ Michael Brondman 005500 0 6 94 Exhibit 3 1 1 d Use Designations General Plan Lan ItSpecific Plan EIR Anaheim Reso 3 5 01485 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e l 1 sc 80NROOO u J I J Ifi i llo i A II I i l l lWc Ffeeamonway o r q Jir f t cj rjl I j 1 n L we T cf i i r c m 1 I I F i 1 I Mountain 11 V e I Con nonwov fI 1 j t 1 S I r8 VVUU Legend o 1000 2000 fee Limit of Anaheim General JH General Resort Commercial Limit ofAnaheim Commercial Ii Il Elementary Resort Specific Plan Professional School Site Low Densicy Commercial 1 Designat for Future Residential Recreational Extcrulon In General Plan Circulation Element Medium Density Business Office w @ R sidential Servicelndusuial a l Designated FuroreAlignment in General Plan Circulation Element mePUCIIInf tvUh The Dis qIu J Rn Spmfi pf c u JIMMtitlJu UJurH J OOOtll 00 m mhniy iUtJ porn isplM UlIucMru nJ MJUWttI PIAu Source SWA August 1994 m1 tich dBrandman Assocwes Exhibit 3 1 1 General Plan Land Use Designations Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area EIR 00550010 894 ---PAGE BREAK--- Aru zheim Reson Specific ptmz ElR Circulation Element The Circulation Element of the General Plan describes existing and proposed major thoroughfares transportation routes terminals and other local public utilities and facilities all correlated with the Land Use Element of the General Plan Existing conditions of the circulation system in the project vicinity are discussed in greater detail in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation The Circulation Element designates improvements to the circulation system of the City of Anaheim including the following improvements within or near the Specific Plan area Extension of Clementine Street south through the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue Extension of Gene Autry WaylPacifico Avenue across 1 5 between Harbor Boulevard and 1 5 Upgrading the capacity of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard to major arterial classification as part of ocrA s Smart Street Program and Upgrading of Orangewood Avenue and Ball Road from West Street to 1 5 and Haster Street from Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue Environmental Resource and Manlllement EI t The Environmental Resource and Management Element consolidates goals and policies for the Conservation Open Space and Parks Recreation and Community Services Elements The Environmental Resource and Management Element encourages the retention ofagriculwrallands especially those in agricultural preserves for ill food and fibre and as valuable open space wbere economically feasible All of the prime agricultural land approximately 56 aaes within the Specific Plan area is identified in the element as an Agricultural Preserve as defined under the CaliforniaLand Conservation Act Williamson Act and has been designated for Commercial Recreation use in the General Plan since this field represents remnanll ofagriculwralland and is surrounded by urban uses The agriculwralland is currently under Williamson Act contract is private1y owned and is notpublic open space The Williamson Act status on the property bas been noticed for non renewal and will expire on March I 2000 Agricultural uses are an allowable use in the Specific Plan area cRAlCAA 3 J 3 1 Land Use Rewed Pions and Policies 01487 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Parks Recreation and Community Services Element e The City of Anaheim adopted the Parks Recreation and Community Services Element in 1992 to provide policy guidance through the year 2010 The purpose of this Element is to enhance the overall quality of life by providing a full range of park recreation and community service facilities and programs that are accessible to all residents workers and visitors The goals and policies address issues such as the development of park and community service facil ities and enhancing visual appeal by development and maintenance of medians parkways and street trees and enhancing Anaheim s parks recreation and services development e Noise Element e The City of Anaheim adopted the Noise Element in 1978 The goals are to protect the environment in the City where noise levels are acceptable and to protect noise sensitive locations throughout the City The Noise Element encourages noise reduction from all sources including mobile and stationary sources e Housinl Element The Anaheim Housing Element was amended in June 1992 The goal of the Housing Element is to plan for the provision of a wide variety of housing opportunities to meet the needs of all economic segments of the community The Housing Element states that housing development could be considered in nonresidential areas however no specific nonresidential areas are identified as potential areas for housing development Further the Commercial Recreation land use designation does not include residential uses Section 3 9 Employment Population and Housing provides additional discussion of housing supply and demand in the City e e The Anaheim Resort SpecifiC Plan reclassifies nonconforming residentially zoned sites to a zonewhich is compatible with the Anaheim Genera Plan while allowing the continuation but not expansion of these nonconforming residential uses In addition the areas within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area that are currently designated Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone will maintain their current overlay zoning designation Growth Manuement Element ee The City of Anaheim adopted a Growth Management Element in early 1992 as part of the City s General Plan The Growth Management Element provides goals and policies to enable the City to CRAlCRA 3I 3 1 7 Land Use Reloled Plans and Polides e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR better balance public infrastructure and service needs in relation to plans for new growth and intensification ofland use in the City to establish development priorities citywide and to develop land use strategies to reduce vehicle miles travelled Additionally the Growth Management Element addresses coordination between the City s Element and regional agencies growth plans and policies Relevant regional planning programs are discussed in greater detail in Section 3 112 City of Anaheim Zoning Ordinance The majority ofW properties in the Specific Plan area are zoned Commercial Recreation There are two parcels located north of Ball Road one to the east of Harbor Boulevard and one to the west which are zoned RS A 43 OOO In addition one parcel north ofBall Road west of Harbor Boulevard is zoned CR MHP Parcels east of Haster Street and north of Wakefield Avenue are zoned RS A 43 OOO MHP Six parcels located generally south of Katella Avenue west of Manchester Avenue are also zoned RS A 43 OOO The Anaheim Convention Center an e Anah im Hilton Hotel a Qu e t Pwt properties are zoned PRo Also applicable to the Specific Plan area is the IBl ReseR Maximum Pennitted Structural Height Map adopted by City Council Ordinance No 5379 which regulates building heights within the Anaheim Resort The Commercial Recreation Zone is intended to provide for and encourage the development of integrated facilities in attractive settings for businesses directly related to entertaining lodging and supplying services to tourists and visitors The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will supersede the existing zoning for the Specific Plan area City of Anaheim Housing AssistaDce Programs The City has a number of programs in place to assist low and moderate income households find affordahle housing within the City These are managed by the both the Community Development Department and the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency They are summarized below Affordable Rental There areseveral affordable rental programs in the City ofAnaheim All of the rental programs apply to very low income households at or below an income of 50 percent of the median dependent on the household size as defined by the U S Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD 3 1 8 Land Use Related PIDns and Policies CRAlCIlA 3 1 01489 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The Senior Ordinance Program gives incentives to developers through allowing smaller sized units and lower parking requirements if certain requirements are met These include making 49 percent ofthe total number of units affordable for senior citizens e The Density Bonus Program is based on developer incentives This program allows for an increase in the number ofunits constructed upon a site by a maximum of 25 percent over the allowable density under the applicable zoning for the site for the commitment ofproviding betWeen 12 and 25 percent of the units as affordable e Tax Exempt Financing provides for below market rate construction and or permanent financing for new rental projects The project must provide for a minimum of 20 percent of the total units as affordable The previously described programs can be combined For example the Senior Ordinance Program can be combined with the density bonus which allows a developer the incentives from both programs e The Anaheim Redevelopment Agency Developer Incentive Program is funded through redevelopment set aside funding for rental housing opportunities to very low income households The Agency is assisting for and non profit developers with the financing and development costs ofaffordable housing through the use of low interest rate loans e An additional rental program available in the City ofAnaheim is the federally funded Section 8 Rental Subsidy Program provided through City administration to very low income households Affordable Homeownership Prollams e The Second Mortgage Assistance Program offers financial assistance to moderateincome households interested in purchasing a home within the designated program area The program provides the home buyer with a deferred payment second mortgage loan to provide the difference between the amount a buyer qualifies for and the loan amount needed for home purchase The program area is generally located south of La Palma Avenue to north of Ball Road between West and East streets e The Density Bonus Program is a develOper incentive program very similar to the bonus program afforded rental housing developers Twenty percent of the permitted number of units must be in the affordable category defined as a household earning a maximum of 80 percent of the HUD median income adjusted to household size The homes retain affordability controls for 30 years Ifthe unit ee 01490 I I I CRAlCRA J 1 3 1 9 Land Use Rewed and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR is resold within the 30 year period it must be resold to a lower income buyer at an affordable income sale price The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan e The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan zoning designation SP92 1 encompasses approximately 489 7 3 Aera t I I 3 bpNI 1t acres located generally south and west of 1 5 refer to Exhibi The Disneyland Kesort Specific Sn t Plan is analyzed as a separate but related project in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts t The property within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area is currently developed with the existing Disneyland theme park and parking lot the Disneyland Hotel complex land currently used for agricultural purposes and the back lf house support and administrative facilities for the theme park In addition several parcels within the Specific Plan area are currently occupied by other uses including hotels parking lots restaurants retail shops recreational vehicle parks and campgrounds a tennis club and a service station or are vacant The adopted Specific Plan creates five districts a Lk Theme Park District a Hotel District a Parking District a Future Expansion District and II with the intent ofchanging the area from a daY lriented attraction to a multi day destination resort The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development ofan international multiday vacation destination resort including the development of a new theme park known as WESTCOT theme park additional hotels and entertainment areas administrative office facilities backlf bouse facilities Ie maintenance facility accessory uses and staging areas new public and private parking facilities and an internal transportation system Said plan addition provides for the existing Disneyland theme park to continue to be modified with new attractions and other improvements The prov 4 Disneyland Resort Specific Plan contains zoning and development standards to regulate development These include standards for design landscaping signage and building height to enhance aesthetic conditions in the area Proposed Hotel Circle SpecifIc PIaD The Hotel Circle Specific Plan proposed for a portion of the Anaheim Resort near the intersection of Katella Avenue and Zeyn Street encompasses approximately 6 8 acres and includes the provision for 1 103 hotel rooms The Specific Plan and environmental documentation are currently under review by the City Ifthe Hotel Circle Specific Plan is not ultimately approved the Hotel Circle project site would be regulated by the Commercial Recreation Zone as it currently exists or as it may be amended by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan in the future refer to Exhibit 3 1 2 and Section 5 0 Alternatives CRAlCRA J 1 3 1 10 Land Use Rell1led Pions and Policies 01491 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e AlU1heim Reson Specific Plan EIR Utility Underground Conversion Program e The City of Anaheim has an adopted utility program which includes undergrounding of overhead facilities e g electric telephone television cable on Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue Ball Road and West Street Disneyland Drive The undergrounding has been scheduled into four phases to be completed between June 1994 and June 1997 Phase I undergrounding is complete Phase II is currently in progress Phase III undergrounding projects have been placed on hold and Phase IV undergrounding has been programmed for completion in June 1997 Phase I included the undergrounding of overhead lines on Harbor Boulevard and West Street south of Katella Avenue to the City limits Phase II includes the undergrounding of lines along Harbor Boulevard north of Katella Avenue to 1 5 Katella Avenue from Walnut Street east to Haster Street is Phase III and Phase IV includes the undergrounding oflines on West Street between Ball Road and Katella Avenue e e South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study The City recently prepared a sewer study that encompasses the South Central Area ofAnaheim which includes the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The study analyzes the proposed land use designations associated with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and other reasonably anticipated projects The purpose of the study was to ensure adequate capacity in the sewer system to handle wastewater requirements projected to be associated with full buildout ofthe area as well as the rest of the South Central Area of Anaheim The sewer system serving the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and potential impacts of the proposed project are discussed in Section 3 9 7 WasteWater and Sewer Service e Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area e The City has recently prepared a storm drainage study that encompasses the South Central Area of Anaheim whicb includes the Anaheim Resort area The study analyzes the proposed land use designations associated with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and other reasonably anticipated projects The purpose of the study was to define and analyze the capacities and restrictions of the storm drainage system and to ensure adequate capacity in the system to handle the stormwater runoff requirements projected to be associated with full buildout of the area as well as the rest of the South Central Area of Anaheim The storm drainage system serving the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and the potential impacts of the proposed project are discussed in Section 3 9 8 Storm Drains e ee CRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 1 01492 Land Use Rewed Plans and Policies ---PAGE BREAK--- t ll I r C l O I t 1 r c r On ti T 1 1 l 0Jl Ii rj L u U l i i ji J I i i C T rr l C J 1 Lr Ii 6 1 I il 1 F I H I 11 fJ ir t li gr i I I L U L 0 11 CiLLCW tcurn J 119J ruF Fil gJI ill i j l nT9 c LL l I i I I r r i I i I I ill c I I I cJcIlCOA I iITJ1 I C j L e e Legend E3 limit ofAnaheim Resort C J Designated Future Alignmen in General Plan CirculaEion Element Cl Anaheim Resort Plan Umit Source SWA 3 16194 o lOOl 2lDl S 005500 0 3194 Exhibit 3 1 2 The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Anaheim Reson Boundari Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR m1 MidladI nndman Aaocims 3 1 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e i e e e ee e OI OU Slrr Oin f 0 p l f 1 1 1 o Rood r 1 1 ITi 1 h l 1 r t I n I g ir i T C n ii r l O 1 C foIAvenueF n I 1 1 1 c r Q F tI 1 is n w II 111 I ln t I i ll o o n ffili f t i f igiT I 7A LJL i I I l I il 1 t 1 if lLri I P I t 1 I A i O I I c woy I i i L 6 8 II I 4 i I P o I Lii LlJ p OtongewoodAWMW l u Legend Imm Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Limi E3 o 1000 Designated Future Alignment in General Plan Circulation Element 11 onn ritm with Th Di sneylanJ sort Spi c P14n Cm ilos A is p14m 10 b Io 000 10 0011 northanti a portio of W SIrffl isp14 If b eom a cul u S UWm PI4 Limit ofAnaheim Resort 2000 feet II Designated for Future Extension in General Plan Circulation Element 1 0 Disneyland Resort Boundary Source SWA August 19Q4 11m Michael Aslooa Exhibit 3 1 2 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim Resort Boundaries 00550010 894 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific EIR Anaheim Tramportation Plans In confonnance with California State Law proposition III the City has submitted to the ocrA a 7 year CMP Capital Improvement Program Maintenance of Effort Budget and adopted Transportation Demand Management TOM Ordinance in an effort to achieve congestion management and air quality improvement objectives The City of Anaheim is participating in many transportation plans and programs These are intended to improve mobility in the City Along with many other Orange County cities the City of Anaheim is participating in a feasibility study for the Central Orange County Fixed Guideway Project a north south rail transit project The route being considered is from Irvine Spectrum to the south through Anaheim and north to the Fullerton Transportation Center The City of Anaheim is currently completing final engineering for improvement of the Amtrakcommuter rail station located next to Anaheim Stadium 3 1 2 R lonal P1annid2I rotlrams Orange County Planning Programs Master Plan of Arterial Hilhways The Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways MPAH designates roadways throughout the County whicb serve as regional arterial routes Any changes proposed by cities to arterial designations on the MPAH are processed through the County as a County General Plan Amendment Roadways designated on the MPAH within the Specific Plan area include Ball Road Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard West Street Pacifico Avenue Orangewood Avenue Cerritos Avenue Freedman Way Clementine Street Convention Way Haster Street and Manchester Avenue Planned improvements to these arterial roadways are discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation Oranle County Con estion Manuement Prol ram California State Law Proposition III requires each county to adopt a Congestion Management Plan CMP to outline bow vehicular congestion issues will be addressed over a S yearperiod A summary of components required by the CMP is as follows Land Use Rewed Plans and Policies CIlAICRA 3 1 3 1 13 01495 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ErR a Land Use Coordination The CMP requires establishment of a program that analyzes the impacts of land use decisions made by local jurisdictions on regional transportation systems The program shall also estimate the costs associated with mitigating identified impacts b Transoortation Modelin2 The CMP requires development of a database and transportation modeling system that are consistent with those used by SCAG e c Level of Service LOS The CMP requires that traffic LOS standards be established for the CMP Highway System which shall include at a minimum all state highways and principal arterials The CMP requires that an LOS standard be set at E or at the existing LOS whichever is further from LOS A for any intersection or roadway segment on the CMP Highway System e d Public Transit Standards The CMP requires that standards for the frequency and routing of public transit be established and that transit service provided by separate operators be coordinated e Transoortation Demand Mana2ement ITDM The CMP requires that jurisdictions adopt and implement a TOM ordinance that promotes alternative transportation methods f LOS Deficiency Plans The CMP requires that Deficiency Plans be prepared that describe how excessive congestion on the CMP Highway System can be mitigated in those cases where acceptable LOS cannot be met at certain locations g Anita Improvement PrOlrram ICIP The CMP requires establishment of a 7 year CIP to maintain or improve LOS and transit performance standards and assist in achieving congestion management and air quality improvement objectives e h Bi Annual Monitorinl The CMP requires that the Congestion Management Agency CMA which in Orange County will be the Orange County Transportation Authority created through SB 838 bi annually determine if the County and Cities are conforming with CMP requirements and shall monitor the implementation by each jurisdiction ofall elements of the CMP In accordance with the Orange County CMP adopted by the Orange County Transportation Authority the City ofAnaheim adopted a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance in 1991 e The Orange County Congestion Management Plan CMP was adopted in July 1991 by OCfA Development ofthe plan involved a coordinated effort among local jurisdictions public agencies and business and community groups in the County The CMP contains provisions for a number of elements intended to improve the County s transportation systems The following elements are included for the first year of the plan ee Traffic LOS standards for the CMP highway system and measurement of existing LOS 3 1 14 01496 Land Use Rewed Plans and Policies CRAlCRA 3 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR Adoption of transportation demand management ordinances by all Orange County local jurisdictions A 7 year capital improvement program Transit service standards and development of a short range transit plan A monitoring checklist process for the four items above Additionally ocrA has adopted the processes and framework for land use coordination model and data base uniformity and level of service deficiency plan components These components are being further refined in the 1992 Orange County CMP The City of Anaheim is a panicipant in the CMP process with the County and has been complying with the above elements pursuant to the County CMP with respect to transportation related planning and management for the City Oransze County Transoortation Authority ocrA The ocrA is proposing the development ofthe Anaheim Regional Intermodal Transportation Center lTC The purpose is to link together many existing and proposed intermodal transportation improvements Proposed within the network are Orange County rail transit the California Nevada Super Speed Train Amtrak Inter City Rail and METROLINK the regional commuter rail system In addition ocrA bus and area shuttles to airports hotels and venues would also provide service South Coast Air Quality Mauagement Soutbern California Association of Governments Regional Planninc Procnms 1991 Air Oua1i Plan The Federal Clean Air Act eM 1990 amendments requires designated agencies in any area ofthe nation not ing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAAQS to prepare a plan demonstrating the steps that will be taken to bring the area into compliance Designated planning agencies in the South Coast Air Basin Basin are SCAQMD and SCAG The 1977 amendments to the Clean Air Act set 1987 as the deadline for ining all federal standards Because the South Coast Air Basin planning agencies could not demonstrate attainment of these standards by 1987 the federal Environmental Protection Agency was directed on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to prepare a Federal implementation Plan FIP The EPA issued a draft FIP in February 1994 The fina1 FIP is scheduled for approval in early 1995 C1lAICIlA 3 1 3 1 5 Land Use Rewed Pions aruJ PoUcies 01497 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e The SCAQMD Board adopted an AQMP revision on July 12 1991 which was prepared to address requirements of the California Clean Air Act It was prepared prior to adoption of the 1990 amendments to the federal Clean Air Act and did not address federal attainment planning requirements The SCAQMD is scheduled to adopt a revised AQMP in July 1994 that will address both state and federal requirements e The CAA requires that federal projects demonstrate conformity to the AQMP The 1991 AQMP extends these requirements to all regionally significant projects Regional significance is defined by land use and project size either in square footage or number of units or hotel rooms The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is considered a regionally significant project under the AQMP e Specific AQMP measures seek to reduce vehicle trips VT and vehicle miles travelled VMT including an extension of SCAQMD Regulation XV that would further reduce work related trips and other trip reduction measures directed toward schools and indirect source facilities that attract vehicle trips such as special event centers regional shopping centers and airports Additional information on the AQMP VMT reductions and conformity guidelines is provided in Section 3 4 Air Quality The analysis of the project s conformity with the AQMP is also presented in Section 3 4 14 Re2ional Mobility Plan e The Regional Mobility Plan RMP selects the combination ofinfrastructure andtransportation control requirements considered to best accommodate the projected population increases in the region until the year 2010 SCAG 1989 Proposed projects must comply with the RMP prior to approval The RMP is consistent with the Growth Management Plan discussed below Growth Manll2ement Plan e e The Growth Management Plan GMP prepared by SCAG contains projections of employment population and housing growth in the Basin and serves as the basis for regional planning efforts to accommodate growth and mitigate the impacts of such growth In addition the GMP establishes regional guidelines for local governments to manage growth including balancing the distribution of future job and housing opportunities in the region SCAG 1989 The plan also sets jobslbousing ratio goals for SCAG s region Section 3 4 Air Quality addresses the GMP in light of regional air quality impacts and Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation addresses regional traffic circulation ee CRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 6 01498 Land Use Rewed Plans and Policies ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR 3 11 3 Relional Transoortation PlanniDl Pro2rams California Department of Transportation Caltrans Interstate 5 Widening This program involves reconstruction of 1 5 throughout Orange County to widen and realign the freeway add high occupancy vehicle HOY lanes and implement a new ramping system Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration FHWA have certified the EIRlEIS for the widening project Anticipated dates for construction work on these projects generally range from the present to 1999 Work on the widening of the portion of 1 5 that borders the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is currently scheduled to begin by 1997 and be completed by 2000 The analysis in Section 3 Transportation and Circulation assumes completion of 1 5 improvements by that date Orange County Transportation Planning Projects Katella Avenue Smart Street Proiect The County of Orange has certified an EIR for the Katella Smart Street Project The EIR examined the potential impacts of widening Katella Avenue from Interstate 605 1 605 to State Route 55 SR 55 including the segment through the Specific Plan area Katella Avenue bisects the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Harbor Boulevard Smart Street Proiect As with Katella Avenue OCTA has designated Harbor Boulevard as a Smart Street Currently there are no plans or environmental work yet performed for this project Central Orange Councy Fixed Guidewav Proiect Several central Orange County cities are punuing a proposed Central Orange County Fixed Guideway COCFG project to serve I3 m or activity centers located in the central core of the County The proposed COCFG project will be linked with existing transit services in the region and is proposed to service the project area The cities and OCTA anticipate developing an innovative fixed guideway e g light rail transit or mooorail transit system that ma imi7 private investmellt with public incentives As the project is currently under evaluation a firm construction schedule bas oot yet been set CRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 17 Land Use iJled PIDns and Policies e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anoheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Other Transportation Planning Programs In addition to the above transportstion plans and projects the following transportstion studies and planning programs may involve the vicinity surrounding the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Orange County Commuter Rail Study State Route 91 Freeway Widening and HOV lanes State Route 57 Freeway Extension to the Interstate 405 Freeway Transit Way Interchange at Cerritos Avenue and the State Route 57 Freeway Anaheim Amtrak Station Regional Intermodal Transportstion Center Study as a part of ARTIC Amtrak Commuter Rail Feasibility Study by OCTA Anaheim Las Vegas Superspeed Train 1 5 Smart Corridor Radio Advisory and Changeable Message Signs Relevant transportstion system improvements are discussed further in Section 3 3 Transportstion and Circulation 3 1 1 4 FannIand MapDiJ12 and MonitoriJ12 Pro2ram Prime FannIandl The U So Soil Conservation Service SCS initiated a program to map the nation s important farmlands in October 1975 The State of California Department of Conservation subsequently initiated a Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program in 1980 to supplement the efforts ofthe SCS For land inventory purposes categorical definitions of imponant farmlands were developed by SCS soil scientists These definitions gave recognition to the land s suitability for agricultural production Seven categories of land use are identified in the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring program prime farmlands farmlands of statewide importanCe unique fartn1ands farmlands of local importance grazing lands urban and built up lands and other lands One site within the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan area is designated as prime farmland Approximately 56 acres are located southeast of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue This field is currently under a Williamson Act contract but a non renewal notice bas been filed The agricultural preserve status on the property will expire on March I 2000 The site is currently fanned with the most recent crop being strawberries 3l 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS e Implementation ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will require several discretionary actions and will result in two development districtS and four development density designations low density low CRAlC RA 1 3 1 8 lAnd Use Relared Plans and Policies o ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR medium density medium density and convention center medium density see Exhibit 2 3b as described in Section 2 0 of this EIR Project Description 3 12 1 City or Anaheim Plannill2 Prol rarns City or Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan identifies the allowable density for future development within the CoR District boundaries Table 3 2 2 presents the proposed densities of the CoR District and indicates the proposed maximum number of hotelmotel rooms and the maximum density rooms per acr As indicated in Table 3 2 2 a maximum of 25 996 rooms would be allowed within the CoR District at buildout The PR District encompasses 62 8 acres 8 6 of which are developed with the existing 1 600room Anaheim Hilton Hotel This District does not have adensity designation however it h been analyzed in this EIR for the impacts associated with the construction of up to 412 additional rooms based upon 125 rooms per gross acre and mitigated for traffic to a level of 100 rooms per acre for 16 1 acres and including the 8 6acre Anaheim Hilton Hotel and 7 5 acres of Anaheim Convention Center property Between the CoR and PR District this EIR analyzes the impact of a total of 27 508 rooms at buildout Ifthe Caltrans Freeway Widening Program is not implemented as proposed an additional 15 1 acres would be available for development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Although the maximum proposed room count under this scenario would allow an additional 1 129 hotel rooms to be built by the year 2010 existing and proposed infrastructure improvements programmed through the year 2010 would not be capable of supporting this additional development without additional mitigation The location and boundaries ofeach area designated with amaximum development intensity are based on the capacity of the public infrastructure access to and capacity of major transportation facilities proximity to major Anaheim Resort attractions such as the Anaheim Convention Center the existing and proposed theme parts and distance to neighboring residential areas Generally development within the central portion of the Anaheim Resort is permitted at higher development intensities than areas located at the periphery of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The commercial recreation uses are consistent with the goals and policies ofthe Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area as development of specific projects within the area will contribute to improving the City s economic base enhancing the position of lAnd Use Relol Plans and Policies CRAJCRA 3 1 3 1 9 01501 e r 1 nil Go I J L t v g 1 tJ l Il P c r t l p t Il o t v 1 1l 3 c 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Resort Specific Plml EIR Anaheim as an internationally recognized tourist destination and providing compatible land uses within the Commercial Recreation designation The goals and objectives of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are further discussed in Section 2 2 of this EIR Project Objectives Additionally the relevant objectives goals and policies of the General Plan are discussed in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan As discussed in Section 2 0 Project Description amendments to the General Plan will be required to recognize that the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan implements the Commercial Recreation land use designation and establishes development density designations for the CoR District Exhibit 3 1 2 Specific Pian Area depicts the limits of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan the adopted r Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan areas Circulation Element In connection with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan a few upgrades and modifications to the circulation system areproposed The following text describes the proposed amendments Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Oran1ewood Avenue Clementine Street is proposed to be redesignated from a Secondary Arterial Highway 4 lanes 9Ofoot right of way to a Modified Secondary Arterial Highway 4 lanes 87 foot right of way designation Convention W between Harbor Boulevard and anoroximatelv L450 feet west of Harbor Boulevard Convention Way is proposed to be redesignated from aPrimary Arterial Highway 6 lanes l06foot right of way to a Modified Primary Arterial Highway 6 lanes liDfoot right of way designation Pacifico Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street Pacifico Avenue is proposed to beredesignated from aMajor Arterial Highway 6 lanes 12Dfoot right of way to a Modified Primary Arterial Highway 6 lanes liDfoot right of way designation Manchester Avenue oarallelin1 the 1 5 east of Harbor Boulevard to north of Alro Mancl1ester Avenue is proposed to beredesignated from a Secondary Arterial Highway 4 lanes 9Ofoot richt of way to a Modified Secondary Arterial Highway 4 lanes 67 foot right of way designation Manchester Avenue south of the DOman Darallelinl the 1 5 Alro WIlY to the in ion of Freedman Wav Mancl1ester Avenue is proposed to be redesignated from a Secondary Arterial Highway 4 lanes 9Ofoot right ilf way to a Modified Secondary Arterial Hichway 4 lanes 87 foot right of way designation 01502 Land Use RelaJed Plans and Policies CRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR filP O Jl e Critical Intersection Clarification Text is proposed to be added to the Cir ulation Element clarifying that the Critical Intersection design for Convention Wa arbor Boulevard Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue Haster Street Anaheim Boulevard Katella Avenue and Pacifico AvenueHaster Streetalso includes the Anaheim Resort required street parkways sidewalks as well as required through travel lanes left turn lanes and right turn only lane a raised median and bus turnouts The Anaheim Resort street parkway sidewalks designs are identified in The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program Section 3 Transportation and Circulation addresses the required improvements to the vehicular circulation mass transit and pedestrian circulation including streetscape elements A Phasing Plan Maintenance Plan and Implementation Plan are provided so that all recommended improvements are effectively carried out These plans address the timing responsible parties and possible funding for provisions and maintenance for the circulation improvements The recommended circulation improvements are consistent with circulation plans for the area and would not result in a significant impact to these plans because they would improve pedestrian circulation and would not reduce vehicular circulation capacity Environmental Resource and Manuement Element All of the agricultural land within the Specific Plan area has been designated for Commercial Recreation land uses on the General Plan and represent remnanlll of agricultural land surrounded by urban uses All agricultural lands currently under Williamson Act contract approximately S6 acres have been noticed for non renewal These contracts will expire on March I 2000 The project would pennit the conversion of agricultural lands however it would also result in the implementation ofthe goals and objectives ofthe existing Commercial Recreation land use designation As such the project falls under two General Plan goals an advisory goal in the Environmental Resource and Management Element to encourage the retention of agricultural lands especially those in agricultural preserves for food and fibre and as valuable open space where economically feasible and the land use designation and related Commercial Recreation goals as described in the Land Use Element of the General Plan The conversion of the agricultural land does not create asignificant impact related to General Plan consistency since the Conservation Element Goal is advisory Further the Genera1 Plan Land Use Plan has designated the property for ultimate development with Commercial Recreation land uses An amendment to the Environmental Resource and Management Element is proposed to remove the agricultural preserve designation and provide consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan In light ofthe pending expiration ofthe preserve staluS oftheland the amendment will not result in significant planning or policy impacts on the General Plan The loss of agricultural land Land Use Related Platrs and Policies CRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 21 01503 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR however is asignificant environmental impact as further described in Section 3 2 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Prime Farmland Noise Element The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for future development Future developments proposed under the Specific Plan would be subject to the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program addressing noise issues Mitigation measures include restricting construction activities to comply with the City s Sound Pressure Level Ordinance transportation improvements to reduce traffic congestion and therefore noise on merials and providing for buffering noise walls and berms in noise sensitive areas No significant indirect impacts or inconsistencies with the Noise Element by the project are projected The complete noise analysis can be found in Section 3 5 Housin Element The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan does not include development of residential uses nor are they currently permitted within land zoned Commercial Recreation The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan reclassifies nonconforming residentially zoned compatibility with the Anaheim General Plan The Specific Plan contains provisions allowing the continuation but not expansion of these residential uses As a result of this reclassification parcels currently zoned Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone will maintain the designation with implementation ofthe project Although the Housing Element encourages preservation of residential uses the residential zoned parcel northeast of Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard is adjacent on two sides to parcels designated Commercial Recreation in the General Plan and is not developed with residential uses Therefore no significant adverse impacts to the City s policies and objectiVes will be associated with the redesignation Impacts ofthe Specific Plan on adjacent residential areas are discussed in Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility Potential effects on the housing supply and demand are discussed in Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing Parks Recreation and Community Services Element e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will help the City of Anaheim achieve goals established for parks recreation and community service in several ways Enbanc ed landscape and streetscape plans are provided and landscaped medians are proposed in the Specific Plan to create visually appealing and safe public walkways The Plan also builds upon the existing character of the Anaheim Resort as an established tourist and conventionrecreation center with standards that support and enbance this 3 1 22 01504 Land Use Rewed Plans and PoUClts CIlAICRA 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR character No conflicts or significant impacts to the Paries Recreation and Community Services Element are anticipated Growth Manalement Element Specific land use developments proposed under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be accompanied by improvements in public infrastructure and services as discussed in Section 3 9 Public Services and Utilities The Specific Plan s consistency with Growth Management Element policies is established by addressing the needed infrastructure improvements including reduction to vehicle miles traveled VMT and improvements to public facilities and services Individual development projects will be required to contribute to infrastructure improvements as specified in the Plan In addition the Anaheim Resort is identified in the City s Economic Development Strategic Plan as apriority growth area Consequently no significant impacts to the goals of the Growth Management Element are anticipated As required by the Element the Specific Plan and EIR mitigation measures will adequately pace individual project development with the provision of any needed infrastructure and public services City or Anaheim Zoning Ordinance The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will establish the zoning for the Specific Plan area Land use regulations in the Specific Plan define the allowable uses within the Specific Plan area The design guidelines describe building landscape requirements Site development standards regulate use density and setback from the property line or public right of way within two Development Districts If the Specific Plan is approved the City s zoning ordinance will incorporate the zoning and development standards set forth in the Specific Plan Those parcels currently zoned for residential US FIlera llR IlG JUt 1 100 aeRed pFej89t is the mat will be rezoned to the Specific Plan designation No significant impacts will result to thezoning ordinance standards from adoption of the Specific Plan City or 1m Housinc AssIstance Programs Development within the Specific Plan Area will DOt directly benefit from the available City housing programs There is no provision for new housing development within the boundaries of the Plan Employees working in the Specific Plan area may however be future beneficiaries of the programs through direct participation in other areas of the City For example the Second Mortgage Assistance Program boundaries are adjacent to the Specific Plan boundaries This would be an ideal area for Specific Plan area employees looking to purchase a home to take advantage of City programs to CRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 23 Land Use Relaltd Plans and Policies 01505 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR facilitate their home purchase No significant impacts will result to the City housing programs from adoption of the Specific Plan There may be however some indirect benefits to employees of the area as participants in one or more of the housing programs Disneyland Resort Specific Plan The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of a new theme park additional hotels and public parking facilities The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area encompasses the parcels adjacent to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan The preparation of the Anaheim Resort and the Disneyland Resort Specific Plans were coordinated to ensure consistency with the General Plan and to avoid planning incompatibilities Both plans provide for enhancements to the visual quality and infrastructure of the Anaheim Resort Therefore no significant planning related impacts to the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan are anticipated from adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan The 6 S acre proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan includes 1 103 hotel rooms The Specific Plan and environmental documentation are currently under review by the City Ifthe Hotel Circle Specific Plan document is not ultimately approved this EIR analyzes an alternative which would modify the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan too encompass the Hotel Circle project site Refer to Section 5 0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project Therefore no significant planning related impacts to the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan are anticipated from adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Utility Undergroundin ConversionJ ro ram As part of the City of Anaheim s 5 year Underground Conversion Program the City has approved undergrounding of all the existing and future utilities 69 kV and 12 kV tranSmission and distribution systems communication systems telephooe CATV and associated facilities on the major roadways in the Anaheim Resort Potential impacts to public services and utilities are discussed in Section 3 9 Public Services and Utilities South Central Area Sewer Defldency Study ee The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will comply with the provisions of and the implementation mechanisms adopted by the City as a result of the South Central Area SewerDeficiency Study Refer CRAlCIlA 3 1 3 1 24 01506 Land Use RelaJed Pions and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Spedfic Plan ElR to Section 3 9 7 Wastewater Sewer Services for a complete analysis of the project impacts and mitigation measures No significant planning impacts will result from this study Master Plan ofDrainage for the South Central Area The implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will require compliance with the provision of and the implementation of mechanisms adopted by the City as a result of the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area Refer to Section 3 9 8 Storm Drains for a complete analysis ofthe project impacts and mitigation measures No significant planning impacts will result from this study Anaheim Transportation Plans The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan incorporates measures to improve and maintain vehicular and mass transit improvements within the Specific Plan area These improvements are discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will comply with the City of Anaheim s Transportation Demand Management TOM program which in turn will be in compliance with the Orange County Congestion Management Plan CMP In addition the project will not significantly affect any designated critical intersection Therefore no significant impacts are anticipated The various transit modes availahle and planned to serve the City of Anaheim will facilitate visitors to the Anaheim Resort who are arriving by transportation modes other than automobile It is anticipated that shuttles to The Disneyland Resort and other hotels in the Anaheim Resort will pick up deliver guests ofthe hotels ocrAhuses will also provide service directly to the Anaheim Resort wbich will assist employees commuting by car The Specific Plan area will also include access to the Orange County Fixed Guideway system The project s lII COmmodation of various meaDs of transportation is considered a beneficial effect 3 1 22 1I Lwta1 PlAnn m c Orange County Master Plan of Anerial S lMPAHl The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan does not propose any changes to the County s MPAH as discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation Future developments proposed within the Anaheim Land Use Relaud Plom and PoUdes CRAlCIlA 3 1 3 1 25 01507 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR Resort Specific Plan area are not expected to require changes to the MPAH Therefore no significant impact to this program is anticipated with implementation ofthe Specific Plan Oran2e County Con2estion Mana2ement Plan CMP As discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will not degrade any portion of the CMP network to an unacceptable level ofservice after mitigation and therefore will be consistent with the goals of the CMP The City is complying with the ocr A established CMP and future developments proposed within the Specific Plan area will be required to comply with area TOM programs in conformance with the CMP No significant impacts are associated with the project Oran2e County Transportation Authority aCTA The International Transportation Center lTC is planned to tie modes of transportation together including buses trains light rail and trams As noted above ocrA buses will also provide service directly to the project area The provision of these services is considered a beneficial effort 14 South Coast Air Quality Management District Southern California Association of Governments Regional Planning Programs 1991 Air Duality Manuement Plan Conformance of the Specific Plan with the AQMP is discussed in Section 3 4 Air Quality The project complies with all three criteria of the Plan I VMT reduction or jobs housing balance 2 TOM implementation and 3 conformity with AQMP assumptions therefore no significant impacts are associated with the project Relional Mobility Plan RMP As discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation the Specific Plan will contribute to infrastructure improvements and transportation control measures that will help accommodate the projected population growth in the region Therefore the proposed project is considered consistent with the goals of the RMP and no significant impacts are anticipated refer to Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation and Section 3 4 Air Quality e 01508 CIlAICRA 3 3 1 26 Land Use Rewed Plans and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Growth Manalement Plan The relationship of the project to SCAG s GMP and regional transportation air quality issues is discussed in Section 3 Transportation and Circulation and Section 3 4 Air Quality The project is consistent with the plan and no significant impacts are anticipated 3 1 2 3 Transoortation PlannilllI f Orarns California Department of Transportation Caltrans Interstate 5 Widening The Caltrans 1 5 improvement program including the transitway and HOV lanes will include two new HOV direct connector offramps for the freeway These ramps will be in addition to the new and reconfigured mixed flow ramps that are part of the Caltrans plans for the 1 5 improvement program and are part of the regional and local transportation programs As part of the 1 5 widening project improvements the southbound 1 5 HOV connector ramp is proposed to connect directly to West StreetDisneyland Drive and the West Parking Area facility in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Vehicles will also be able to use this ramp to exit at Ball Road The northbound 1 5 HOV connector ramp will directly access Freedman Way for access to the East Parking AreallTC in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area These parking areas within the boundaries of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan were designed to accommodate both The Disneyland Resort and Anaheim Convention Center traffic These changes are a benefit to traffic flow in the area As discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides for integration ofthe transportation and circulation improvements offuturedevelopment projects with Caltrans widening of 1 5 therefore no significant adverse effects are anticipated Orange COWlty Transportation Authority PIannin Projects Katella Avenue Smart Street Proiect The Smart Street designation and funding of Katella Avenue will provide more capacity between 1j 5 and SR 5S This will accommodate traffic flow through the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area There will be no significant impacts on the Smart Street project from plan implementation cRAlCRA 3 1 3 1 27 Land Use Related PlalJS and Policies 01509 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Harbor Boulevard Smart Street Proiect The Smart Street designation will have no direct benefit to the proposed project although when the street is built to the Ire esee Smart Street ttwill adequately accommodate traffic generated by the buildout of the Anaheim Resort No significant impacts on the Harbor Boulevard Smart Street Project will result from the project Central Oranle County Fixed Guidewl Proiect The proposed fixed guideway route under consideration would extend from Irvine Spectrum in the south to Anaheim Stadium and then north to the Fullerton Amtrak Station Within Anaheim two alignments connecting Anaheim Stadium to Fullerton are being examined west on Katella Avenue and north on Clementine Street and west on Cerritos Avenue northwest along 1 5 and north along Harbor Boulevard The Specific Plan will encourage a connection to the fixed guideway system by future development No significant project impact will occur 3 1 2 4 Fannland MapDine and MonitoriD1 Pro2ram Prime Fannland The 56acre agricultural field located within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is categorized as prime agricultural land by the California Department of Conservation on the Important Farmland Series maps The loss of the agricultural fields reduces the land available for the food production based on the most recent crop production of strawberries The loss ofthe field within the project area ft will result in less than a percent reduction of the land currently cultivated for strawberry production in the state Siebert 1992 Nevertheless loss of any prime agricultural land is considered a significant impact by the California Department of Conservation Based on its designation as prime farmland and the declining amount of farmland resources in the state the removal ofthe agricultural field is considered a significant environmental impact From acommunity planning perspective the conversion ofthis agricultural land to an urban use Le hotel retail restaurant is not premature The field represents a remnant ofagricultural land and is surrounded by urban uses The surrounding area has been developed for a number ofyears The City of Anaheim General Plan has designated the farmland for Commercial Recreation land use The proposed project will implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan designation Consequently the potential loss of the farmland does not create a significant impact related to local land use plan consistency ee 01510 3 1 28 Land Use Rewed Plans and Policies CRAlCRA 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Reson Specific Plan EIR The strawberry farm is the only agricultural land within the project area that is currently designated as an agricultural preserve under the Williamson Act as previously described The agricultural preserve contract is renewed annually for a 10 year period unless there is a request filed to remove the property from this status Because the non renewal notice was filed to allow the agricultural preserve contract to expire the property will be eligible for development of nonagricultural uses by March 1 2000 Vaughan 1991 e 3 13 MITIGATION MEASURES Standard Mili2ation Measures nor pno 1 of z I l SAc 16 0 1 e t el e d Miti2ation Measure 3 1 1 fleeiae Pie rea The Cily will re iew final site plansAfor future S e 9 e 1 cr a developments within the Anaheim Resort or consistency with the Specific Plan 3 14 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS No significant unavoidable adverse effects are anticipated wnlI exceplof r e o o1 N tLd c e a v c h s ol s dpteJ SiO C a e CRAJCRA 3 1 29 Land Use Rewed Pions and Policies e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e 3 2 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY This section discusses the existing and proposed land uses in the project area the compatibility of land use conditions such as density height and bulk of land uses adjacent to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area with those within the Specific Plan area and the potential conversion ofexisting uses to uses in conformance with the Specific Plan Analysis ofthe cumulative effects of the proposed project and other reasonably foreseeable development relative to the land use compatibility is provided in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts 3 2 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS 3 2 1 Overview of ExistiDl Land Uses The environmental setting of the project area consists of the existing physical conditions or existing land uses in the project area and in the surrounding areas that relate to the project area Plans and policies are discussed in Section 3 1 Land Use Related Plans and Policies The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is located within the Anaheim Resort a portion ofthe City of Mlaheim specially designated by the City s General Plan for recreation and touristconvention related activities along with related uses The Anaheim Resort itself contains approximately 1 046 acres The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is generally located southwest of I S between the West StreetBall Road interchange and Orangewood Avenue though aportion is located north of the I SlHarbor Boulevard interchange The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan encompasses approximately S49s acres and is currently zoned C Commercial Recreation PR Public Recreational and RS A 43 OOO ResidentiallAgricultural fthe parcels also have an MHP Mobilebome Park Overlay zoning designation In general the existing land uses within the Specific Plan area consist of the Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities convention and visitor serving hotels and motels restaurants retail establishments and service stations tourist related commercial establishments mobile home parb industrial uses RV campgrounds agricultural land apost office vacant land and 8County of Orange agricultural research center housed in a warehouse strUcture Land usesdirectly surrounding the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area include single and multi family residential uses primarily to the south and north and I S on the east The existing Disneyland theme park Disneyland Hotel complex and related parking facilities are located within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan zone adjacent to the various development areas within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area East of I S are singlefamily residential mobilehome commercial professional and industrial uses Existing land uses are illustrated in Exhibit 3 2 1 Existing Land Uses and in Map Pocket I Existing zoning designations are shown on Exhibit 3 2 18 ee 3 2 1 Land Use Compatibility CRAlCRA 3 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Pkm EIR The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan encompasses two districts the C R District Development Area 1 and the PR District Development Area 2 There are currently 11 190 hotel and motel rooms within the Specific Plan area in addition to numerous restaurant and retail uses Table 3 2 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Existing Development Summary indicates the acreage in each development area Exhibits 2 3a and 2 3b identify the location of each development area TABLE 3 21 ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN DEVEWPMENT SUMMARY Approximate of Way Existing Land Use Acreage Commercial Recreation C R Hotelmotel restaurant and other 317 6 District Development Area I visitor serving uses Public Recreation PR District Anaheim Convention Center Anaheim 62 8 Development Area 2 Hilton Hotel and accessory uses I S Widening Area Land designated for I S widening IS 1 within the Specific Plan area Public Right of Way Land designated for the public right IS4 of way within the Specific Plan area Total S495 Mobilehome Park MHP Overlay Existing Mobilebome Parks 31 5 C R District Approximately 1S 1 acres of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are designated for future I S right of way Until such time as this land is acquired by Caltrans it will be subject to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone C R District and the density designation in which the property is located Exhibit 2 3b C R District Density Plan identifies the locations of the density designations A summary of the I S widening acreage and the corresponding density is provided in Exhibit 3 2 2 C R District Development Density Summary Tabulation of the Specific Plan Plans showing the properties affected by the I S widening are on file with the City Public Works Engineering Deparnnent Source SWA 1994 01513 CRAlCRA J 2 3 2 2 Land Use Compatibiliry ei e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e Legend o tOOl 2lXXl feet Ollia Them Park BI CDlIllIl fIial Industrial I Anaheim Raort Specific Plan Anaheim Raort Boundaty F I Pub6c11nstilUrional Agricultwe10pen Spot o Vacant Pub6c ROW Low Density Raidential Medium Density Residential Mobilehom Park RVM Sourc SWA Jun 199 Michad Brandman Exhibit 3 2 1 Existing Land Uses Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 005500 0 694 3 2 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Legend limit ofAnaheim I Agricuhure1 Resort Open space I I Limit ofAnaheim Service Rcson Specific PlanL J Hotel o Low Density Residential 11II Medium Density RV P k Residential IZJ I Publid Insrirutional Mobilehome Park Theme Parkl Commercial Convention Center Office Vacant I Public ROW Source SWA August 1994 e Exhibit 3 2 1 Existing Land Usese Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area EIR n MlChatl B dman Assoclatcs 00550010 8 94 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e j Ii I 11 I JLJ J 11 Legend J Poe A I o 1000 2000feet 1 I Anaheim Resort Specific Plan l SP92 1 Mobikhome Park MHP Overjoy G3J AnWimResort Boundary I J RS A 43 000 CJ C R Zone PRZonc SOli SWA Jun 1994 m1 Mich dBrandmar1 As50ciaICS 00550010 694 3 24 Exhibit 3 2 1 a Existing Zoning Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Onsite Land Uses Existing land uses are described on Table 3 2 1 and are illustrated on Exhibit 3 2 1 and in Map Pocket L Exhibit 3 2 la illustrates the existing zoning designations within the Anaheim Resort Generally land uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area consist ofa variety of commercial retail hotel motel and visitor and convention serving uses as well as some vacant land and land used for agricultural purposes In addition a post office a fire station and some non conforming uses such as mobilehome parks single family homes and industrial and office facilities are located in the Specific Plan area The Anaheim Convention Center is located on the south side of Katella Avenue west of Harbor Boulevard The area generally located north of Orangewood Avenue east of Harbor Boulevard south of Katella Avenue and west of Haster Street consists of approximately 56 acres currently in agricultural production As discussed in Section 3 I Land Use Related Plans and Policies this acreage is designated as prime farmland by the California department of Conservation California Department of Conservation 1988 This property is also currently an agricultural preserve under the provisions of a Williamson Act contract A notice of non renewal of the contract has been filed therefore the agricultural preserve status will expire March I 2000 10 years after filing of the notice There is an existing private residence and me mobiletrailer homes and storage facilities currently located within the agricultural area Surrounding Land Uses Existing land uses west of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area consist of Disneyland and single family residential uses Northeast of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are a single family residence a retirement home and condominiums Land uses north of the Specific Plan area are predominantly singlefamily residential with arange ofhigher density residential uses and commercial service hotel and retail uses located between 1 5 and the Harbor BoulevardIBall Road intersection South ofBall Road are commercial uses singlefamily residences multi family residences and mobile homes South of Cerritos Avenue east of 1 5 and continuing east of Anaheim Boulevard are a range of industrial uses South of Katella Avenue and east of Anaheim Boulevard are mobilebomes and multi family residences Single and multi family residential uses are found immediately south and west of the Convention Center and around the periphery of the Anaheim Resort lAnd Use CompatibiUry CIlAICll A 3 2 3 2 5 01517 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific PlmI EIR 3 2 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 3 2 2 1 Swoe of Analvsis Implementation of the proposed project will require several discretionary actions including adoption and approval of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan as described in Section 2 0 Project Description This document is intended to provide guidelines and regulations for the future development of the Specific Plan area This section addresses the general nature and intensities of the land uses proposed under the Specific Plan and analyzes the potential land use compatibility impacts affecting onsite and surrounding land uses First conversion ofexisting land uses to those in conformance Specific Plan is analyzed Second the land use compatibility of the proposed uses with surrounding land uses is analyzed Land use compatibility is primarily determined by the sensitivity of a land use to the characteristics associated with another land use such as activity noise density and appearance Therefore other sections ofthis EIR which analyze these environmental changes are relevant to the analysis of land use compatibility and are referenced in this discussion No potential significant incompatibilities between the proposed land uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan or between the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan are anticipated because the proposed uses are designated to complement and support eacb other Further the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan will bave similar or compatible operational requirements e g botels restaurants and parking facilities In the C R District Development Area I restaurants hotels motels and other related facilities will be permitted uses In addition many service and retail businesses intended to accommodate visitors such as barber or beauty sbops travel agencies automobile rental agencies and specialty retail shops will also be permitted wben integrated within a botelmotel development Those uses wbicb are consistent with the overall intent ofthe Plan but wbicb may require special consideration in order to assure compatibility with surrounding uses such as dinner theaten will require conditional use permits e In the PR District Development Area 2 City owned uses such as the Convention Center complex and associated parking facilities are allowed as well as the existing I 600room Anaheim Hilton Hotel Other related visitor serving uses allowed in this District as accessory uses are concession stands restaurants and sbops The area encompassed by the PR District is currently zoned PR co U o 3 Hi lAnd Use Compatibility CJlAICRA 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Public Recreational and subject to the regulation set forth in Chapter 18 86 of the Anaheim Municipal Code The PR zone standards will continue to apply to this area The ltah im Rl ggJt SpIGifh Plan tal11iSR8S fsyr separate hetel reaRl deRail di itrie fOf the C R Distriet Replj1 ce A tif ser1 on o r paQe Low Density which permits development of up to 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Low Medium Density which permits development of up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Medium Density which permits development of up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater Convention Center Medium Density which permits development ofupto 125 rooms per gross acre with fI eR4ilf liiipael mitigated to the level of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever is greater III ad4itiQA to hI manilfttifft hotd motcl lVUUQ plI11 lt 4 tip ta 29 18reeRt sf the total Mea of a A9lel tmBtellrejeet 34U81t feetagt Gxeltu liftll arltiBg faeilities may he de ll e to inb 6 ated accuso 11111 Ive UIi86 ether than hotela ffl tellJ 8Bd theif mtegrated aGt9U9 1 HIes rlfer Exhi it J 3h in PortiOA 2 The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan identifies the allowable density for future development within the C R District boundaries Table 3 2 2 presents the proposed densities ofthe C R District and indicates the proposed maximum number of hotel motel rooms and the maximum density rooms per acre As indicated in Table 3 2 2 a maximum of 25 496 rooms would be allowed within the C R District As noted in Section 3 1 Land Use Plans and Policies the PR District does not have a density designation but has been analyzed in this EIR for up to 412 additional botelmotel rooms Ifthe Caltrans Freeway Widening Program is not implemented as proposed an additional 15 1 acres would beavailable for development within the Anabeim Reson Specific Plan Although the maximum proposed room count under this scenario would provide enough land to accommodate an additional 1 129 hotel rooms to be built by 2010 existing and proposed infrastructure improvements programmed through the year 2010 would not be capable of supponing this additional development CRAlCRA 3 2 3 2 7 Lmrd Use Compatibility 01519 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Replacement for Page 3 2 7 2nd paragraph 1st sentence The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan establishes four density designations for the C R District refer to Exhibit 2 3b in Section 2 0 These designations are based upon hotel motel development and allow up to 20 of each hotelmotel project gross square footage excluding parking facilities to be developed with integrated Le included within the main hotelmotel complex accessory uses These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotel motel density at the rate of one hotel motel room per six hundred 600 gross square feet of accessory use For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels motels with accessory uses the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotelmotel including accessory uses density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval Following are the four density designations ---PAGE BREAK--- A1ulheim Resort Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 22 CoR DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT DENSITY SUMMARY TABULATION Existing Maximum Maximum Approximate HotelIMotel Hotel Motel Density Designation Density Acres Rooms Rooms Low Up to 50 714 1 926 3 777 rooms acre Low Medium Up to 75 1716 4 523 12 873 rooms acre Medium Up to 100 19 2 422 1 920 rooms acre Convention Center CC Up to 125 55 4 2 719 6 926 Medium rooms acre Total 317 6 25 496 DENSITY FOR TIlE 1 5 WIDENING RIGHT OF WAY Low Up to 50 3 8 190 rooms acre Low Medium Up to 75 7 7 579 rooms acre Medium Up to 100 3 6 360 rooms acre Total 15 1 1 129 The maximum density for eacb lot or parcel is the number of rooms acre noted in this table or 75 rooms per lotparcel existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan wbichever is greater For parcels that are developed with botel or motel rooms wbich exceed the maximum density designation the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density 1 rw M A d H f m u 1IIIjI s nf these botel motel rooms shall be mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per acre Source SWA 1994 CRAlCRA 3 2 3 2 8 Land Use CompatibiUty 01521 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Pion ErR e The location and boundaries of each area designated with a maximum development intensity are based on the capacity of the public infrastructure access to and capacity of major transportation facilities proximity to major Anaheim Resort attractions such as the Anaheim Convention Center and the existing and proposed theme parks and distance to neighboring residential areas Generally development within the central portion of the Anaheim Resort is permitted higher development intensities than areas located at the periphery of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan proposes unique development standards and guidelines for the central core ofthe project area that do not apply elsewhere in the Specific Plan area Parcels affected by these development standards include those adjacent to Harbor Boulevard between 1 5 and Orangewood Avenue and those adjacent to Katella Avenue between Haster StreetAnaheim Boulevard and Walnut Street The Central Core standards and guidelines apply to properties with frontage adjacent to these streets l clec1 0 p ol 8v d lo ret 4 Because the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan sea Ret Ir po5 llIlY future development Wthe area no direct land use compatibility impacts will occur with the Specific Plan s adoption To ensure consistency between future developments proposed within the Specific Plan boundaries and the relevant provisions set forth in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan approval of projects under the terms of the Specific Plan will require approval of a Final Site Plan It is the City s intent that future development projects that are within the parameters set forth in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and or that do not exceed the environmental thresholds as set forth in this EIR are not subject to further environmental review if potential impacts are within the scope ofthose addressed in this EIR 5t C c c Pt The processing requirements for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are described in the proposed Municipal Code Section IS 7S 040 020 1 d in Chapter 7 0 Zoning and Development Standards of the proposed Specific Plan approval of projects under the terms of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will require approval of a Final Site Plan and for certain uses a conditional use permit 3 21 or ExistiDl l and Uses As noted implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will not result in direct land use compatibility impacts However under the Specific Plan existing uses on several parcels will become non ronforming uses The Specific Plan will identify these parcels for conversion to visitor and convention related land uses permitted by right and by Conditional Use Permit depending on the use proposed under the Specific Plan Hotels motels restaurants resorts and other related facilities will be permitted uses as they serve to accommodate commercial recreation visitors in the area Service and retail businesses intended to accommodate visitors such as barber beauty sbops travel agencies e 3 2 9 Land Uu Comparibiliry Cl AlCRA 3 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR automobile rental agencies and specialty retail shops will also be permitted Uses which are consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan but which may require special consideration in order to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses ie dinner theaters will require a conditional use permit Refer to Section 7 0 Zoning and Development Standards of the Specific Plan AppendixDB of this EIR for a complete list of all permitted primary uses accessory uses conditional uses and prohibited uses The uses that will be identified for conversion to Commercial Recreation uses under the provisions of the Specific Plan are described below Additionally the dislocation impacts associated with the intersection and roadway improvements are discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation Existing uses south of Katella Avenue and east of Haster Street include two mobile home parks various commercial uses and warehousing A Mobilehome Park MPH Overlay Zone Exhibit 3 2 2 exists and is proposed to continue for the mobile home park properties currently within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The intent of the overlay zone is to mitigate the identified relocation problems and adverse effects of displacement upon the displaced mobile home owners when a park is converted to another land use The MHP Overlay Zone is proposed to permit the properties with the current mobile home use to continue with their current land use or in accordance with the regulations and procedures identified in the MHP Overlay Zone to be developed with uses permitted or conditionally permitted by the C R District zoning regulations contained in Section 7 0 Zoning and Development Standards of the Specific Plan No hotel or motel proposals are currently being considered for these properties No significant land use conversion impacts are anticipated with continuation of the MHP Overlay zone The area located north of Katella Avenue between Clementine and Haster streets currently contains industrial and commercial uses as well as vacant properties A portion ofthis area has been proposed for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan Refer to Exhibit 3 1 i this plan is currently being reviewed by the City of Anaheim The Hotel Circle Specific Plan provides for the development of a total of 1 103 botel rooms within two existing hotels and three new hotels Under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan the existing industrial and commercial uses may be considered non ronforming uses and will be identified for redevelopment andor conversion to commercial recreation uses However because of the availability of other commercial and industrial properties nearby the redevelopment or conversion of these uses is not considered a significant impact Existing land uses located adjacent to I S and northeast of the intersection of AnaheimlHaster Street and Katella Avenue include a restaurant and The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan designates this area for medium density hotel development or a maximum of 340 hotel rooms Although existing uses will be allowed to remain the would be a non ronforming use cRAlCRA 3 2 3 2 10 01523 Land Use Compatibility e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Legend t j I l jf ii l L I L L i it I I i f l m ii I r I I I tl J I i i Eli r I r iCT JI J l L 1 A I L j J I 1 I rl 1 rfi T J I c I V Iii li 1 hi j r L tI i Ii E3 E3 1 o 1 CXl 2CXll teet umi ofAnaheim Resort Designated Fucure Alignment in General Plan Circulation Elemen Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area ParceL Subjea 0 he Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone Source SNA 3116 94 d h o J IIIlIIII till Mi hodBrandnw1 Astociaia Exhibit 3 2 2 Mobilehome Park Overlay MHP Zone 005500 0 694 3 2 11 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- t lA lJe fO A I rc aN ad1 1 fJ s SJ L I 11 j i I j Ii II I cr I r o CerritosAVMue I m r 11 I I J I m n i f l p t Off iI Ka It t t I Jl Ul L 91 td j LTf c Li I r I 1 1 Vii J I e Kolella Avenue OUliJnment it1COnneC wiCl8l llnQ Sees cllon 40 Of Ine Pbn document to otrler 15 leIC PacIfIcO A enutt w A nUll i Legend 1 i Limit ofAnaheim R sort 1 Designated for Furure Extension in General Plan Circulation Element EJ o 1000 2000 feet Pate 1s Subject to the Mobil home Park Overlay Zone in the C R District Designated Future Alignment in General Plan Circulation Elemem In conn tion with The lnortSpecific Plan Cerrito Awn isplanned to be relocated 1 000 1 100 fret 1IImhm arui aportion of West S rct is plan1Uti b omc a l tk SiI West Place mnDII I Anaheim Resort Specific Plan At Source SWA August 1994 00550010 8 94 Exhibir 3 2 2 Mobilehome Park Overlay MPH Zon Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area EI R m1 idu Associates ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e The implementation of the Specific Plan may ultimately result in the conversion of the existing land uses commensurate with the medium density hotel designation proposed by the Specific Plan No significant land use compatibility impact would result as there are other commercial facilities in the vicinity offering similar services of the Specific Plan area The properties located north of Ball Road east of 1 5 and west of Harbor Boulevard are currently zoned for and maintain commercial recreation uses The parcels located east of Harbor Boulevard are zoned for residential agricultural and CoR use and contain commercial retail uses an RV park and the Orange County agricultural center Because this area is located adjacent to residential areas on the periphery of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area the Specific Plan designates it for low density hotel development Again implementation of the Specific Plan may ultimately result in the conversion of the existing land uses to land uses consistent with the Specific Plan designation Ultimate displacement ofthe agricultural center would not be considered significant because the center is not site dependent and the use could be relocated to another property However this is publicly owned land and sale or development would have to be initiated by the County Conversion of the commercial retail uses to commercial recreation uses would not constitute asignificant impact because many other commercial facilities offer similar amenities in the local vicinity The Anaheim Convention Center located south of Katella Avenue north of Orangewood Avenue east of West Street and west of Harbor Boulevard is presently zoned for Public Recreational use The purpose ofthe public recreational designation is to establish a zone to preserve regulate and control the orderly use of City owned properties and adjacent private property The Anaheim Hilton Hotel which is presently zoned PR Public Recreational is also within the PR District The proposed Specific Plan would redesignate the Convention Center and the Anaheim Hilton Hotel r from the PR zone to the PR District litJ tile zoning regulations we1114 remairiilie same witillhe d1at dIe PR Oi iet ould be 3uhjeet te the 5 8 tn ildiBg setbl6k FO JQHemtAtI JlORg Ka Mlla veBtl GLld W su as me LI uillu i i The redesignation ofthe Specific Plan properties from Public Recreational use to a PR District would allow the same uses as currently allowed therefore is not considered a significant impact There is one industrial use the Odetics site located west of 1 5 and Anaheim Boulevard on Manchester Avenue Under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan the existing facilities would be a non conforming use but would be allowed to remain Because of the availability of industrially zoned land and industrial uses developed nearby the ultimate conversion of this land to hotel or other commercial recreation use is not considered significant e CIlAICRA 3 2 3 2 12 lAnd Use Compa1ibiliry ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR In recognition of the extensive existing development within the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area the Specific Plan contains provisions that permit existing hotels or motels to rebuild or renovate at their existing densities existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan even if the current density exceeds the maximum density that would be permitted by the density category in which the property is located In addition up to 20 percent of the total area of a hotel motel project may be devoted to integrated Le included within the hotelmotel complex accessory uses 3 2 2 3 Loss orA 2riculturaI Land The agricultural field located in the southern ponion ofthe Specific Plan area constitutes 56 acres and is categorized as prime agricultural land by the California Department of Conservation on the Imponant Farmland Series maps The loss of the agricultural fields wiIl reduce the land available for food production specifically for the production of strawberries based on the most recent crop cultivated The loss of the field within the project area will result in less than a 0 002 percent reduction of the land currently cultivated for strawberry production in the state Sieben 1992 Loss of any prime agricultural land is considered a significant impact by the California Department of Conservation Based Solely on its designation as prime farmland and the declining amount offarmland resources in the state the removal ofthe agricultural field is considered a significant environmental impact The development of the agricultural land is also discussed in Section 3 1 Land Use Related Plans and Policies and Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts 3 2 4 Compatibility with Surroundilll Land Uses This section discusses land use compatibility issues such as activity intensity ofuse and appearance wbich are relevant to an analysis of the compatibility of permitted Specific Plan land uses with the existing surrounding land uses As hh e8SiBfSiQg A Jotlll9Val ef xiJtinBland Hie n gf the Spaeifie Pl8 R etlhl Bet is an dircet mr atibilil tmpaeu b8t iIUSe it Elees Bet prefl8se fulUft n vlnp tf However specific developments proposed which are within and consistent with the Specific Plan could impact neighboring uses Compatibility impacts can be separated into two issues I compatibility of developing uses with surrounding propenies and 2 potential ongoing operational conflicts with surrounding uses Land use compatibility and operational conflicts are considered significant ifthey will lead to impacts on the health and general welfare of persons living or working in the area impacts on adjacent properties that would in turn lead to physical degradation of the properties caused by disinvesbnent or abandonment Such incompatibilities and conflicts are characterized by nuisances such as odor and noise physical or visual intrusion into the adjacent land use substantial traffic intrusion or operational intrusion or increased risk to human safety Without appropriate site planning that includes adequate separation ofuses buffers setbacks CIlAICRA 3 2 3 2 13 Land Use Compatibility e fl ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e e and safeguards such conflicts could be significant The Districts within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are designed to be internally compatible with each other the uses designated within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area and other adjacent uses Compatibility of Developing Uses with Surrounding Properties e To ensure functional and visual compatibility among land uses permitted within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and existing surrounding uses the Specific Plan includes a design plan that describes specific site planning requirements architectural guidelines and site development standards to be incorporated into projects proposed within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area e e The design plan specifies three distinct levels ofdesign hierarchy called the Public Realm the Setback Realm and the Private Realm also refer to Section 3 11 Visual Resources and Aesthetics The intent is to have the most rigorous design controls in the most visually prominent areas Specific landscape setback and site planning guidelines are defined for each ofthese three realms to promo visual continuity between the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and surrounding areas while creating a consistent high quality pedestrian Qriented environment e or Along streets in the Central Core the minimum structural setback is 26 feet fFem properties abutting the Harbor Boulevard ultimate right Qf way and II feet for properties abutting the Katella Avenue ultimate right Qf way Outside the Specific Plan Central Core Exhibit 3 2 3 area the width ofthe minimum setback will vary depending on the General Plan designation ofthe frontage street and the height of the building on the lot For example the minimum setback for buildings up to 75 feet tall adjacent to major primary and secondary arterial roads is 20 feet For buildings greater than 75 feet the setback requirement is 30 feet Adjacent to local streets the minimum setback for buildings 75 feet or less shall be 10 feet for buildings greater than 75 feet the minimum setback shall be 20 feet These setback requirements serve to guide overall bulk and density of development Both landscape and building setback standards are less than or equal to those currently prescribed in the C R Zone Therefore impacts would be the same as those expected from development consistent with current guidelines Refer to Table 3 2 3 which illustrates the comparison of setbacks proposed in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to those in the existing CoR Code e e Adjacent to residential uses interior property setback lines would be two times the height of the building with a20foot landscaped setback The height of any building adjacent to a singlefamily zone shall not exceed one balf the distance to the ZO boundary A minimum 6foot masonry wall shall be located at the property line to further buffer adj dential uses from Anaheim Resort uses Tbili r dard is th J AUftoo as tbC R IeM SdJoAd l so 11 h4 yc l r rc C Te C olf COl l o IVU 0 Jo l we 5 1 e r 5 4rd lo c 1l C p pcf o t olt c p If l c I a IC G I Jlt ploI t OO Uca r 5 1 0 e CRAJCRA 2 3 2 14 Land Use Compatibility ee 01528 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 2 3 SETBACK COMPARISON Anaheim Resort Setback Comparison Anaheim Resort CoR Zone Comparison Street Name Crou Parkway Sidewalk Land T 1aI Side Land Total Difference in EfJecUve Setback Section Reference cape effective walkl ocape efTecUve Section 5 8 21 tbock aetback land lICtback tbock pe BaD Road w o I 51 6 4 211 30 31 40 10 30 40 10 0Eaat of 1 5 6 ft tree wella tnalcad rporkwayl Clementine Street 6 4 211 30 32 42 13 30 43 11 A 15foot landscape median is olso pn pOOCdl Convention Way 0 10 211 30 30 40 10 30 40 10 0ExttIng condition to remain t planting area withinatdewaJk S ISfoot median Fn edman Way 6 211 30 3a 43 13 30 43 IC O Harbor Boulevard 0 9 211 30 29 39 9 20 29 010 A 16foot median win be Iand north of BaD Road acapcdl Harbor Boulevard I 6 26 50 9 20 29 21 12026 foot median wiD be Jand uth or Manche Raped It rAvcnuc Anaheim Boule S 4 211 30 3G 40 10 30 40 IC O vard ter Street Katella Avenue 16 11 35 9 30 39 A 24 26 foot median wtll be lanel Kapcd Manchutel Ave 211 30 335 13 30 43 9 5 A 15 foot median wUl be Iand nuc t 43 aped Manchester Ave 4 211 30 32 42 13 30 43 ll lIAdJatt nt toIntenlatc 5 then wiD nue Mld South 6 be no sidewalk and the parkway Is SID KatcDa AvaNC reduced to 5teet Onnaewood 211 30 13 43 10 30 40 7 3 nue PadftcoAvenue 4 211 30 3640 9 N N N Local Stt1 cw lro 4 U 20 20 30 10 1030 2040 010 Way CUa Vl8ta 6 Zeyn 1 Local Stn ct Qx 4 1020 211 30 4 1030 14 35 6 Rood Loca IStreet Ver 0 9 U 20 1929 9 1030 11139 01016 foot tree wdls within8kic waIk monl Walnut Slft et 30 43 13 30 43 o A I5 foot median WiD be landKapedl We lt Dia 20 30 3a 43 9 30 39 6 4 neyland Ortve north of BaD Wait Stn etI t8 9 8 19 35 9 30 39 4 IA 5 lOot median wID be 1and8capedl neyland between Katc n CUrta Weal Street Uth 8 211 30 13 43 8 30 39 6 4 of Katdla AvalUC NA NA 10 10 NA NA 10 0 Interlor 1 NA NA Varia NA NA o ck II 2 tsmes het ht of alructutel Intenltatc 5 NA NA 10 10 NA NA 100 Sourc SWA Juno 1994 CRAlCRA J 2 3 2 15 Land Use Compatibility 01529 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e ee i laII i l I i l m lln mi rr jiIEr fffil r mm 1 Ih d I T i iiG ii JiLi c 6 r I I III rj J j L J lj i i jL J i i ill i i Facltco mmT 3mm I i II i mL r L J II j IUJU I J t r Legend E3 E3 E3 Sourcs SWA 3116 94 c LimitofAnaheim Resort Anaheim Raort Specific Plan Boundary Designated Future Alignment in General Plan Circulation Element CClunlCo o 1000 2000 1M IIIIIIII 1 m1 Michad Astocia 00550010 694 3 2 16 Exhibit 3 2 3 Central Core Plan Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- OO l el n X fr w5 I 0 Place 100 aa IC O pr 1 I 1 E9J1 ll 1 I I II i I r p 1 6l JI J I Way ie j gl i I j l olelloA nt Ii I i i IU in COflnectlon wiltll 5 I I Ii 5 i wldenlng 5e4lSecllon O i 11 a I 1 1 i i tI Q lI leSpeciticPlOn I I i d irinfl a iO efoA i h ll t IEif H 1 J PoeitlcoA a Legend G3 CJ LimitofAnaheim Resort Anaheim Resort Specifie Plan Boundary Designated fOr Future Extension in Genenl Plan Circulation Element lXJ o 1000 2000 feet Special Landscaped Intersections described in Section 5 6 34 of he Specic Plan document I E Designated Future Alignment in General Plan Circulation Element In Dnn tiDn with Th Dim lantiWon Spifi Plan C mtfJI Awn is plann d10 b Ioco 000 tfJ 00fin ond 0poTtimof Wns S isplannni tfJ bm 0 cul d 1 WPIoc c Central Cote Srandasds and guidelines apply to ptope ies with frontage along these portions of Ketdla Avenue and Hasbot Boulevasd Source s NA Augus 1994 005500 0 8 94 Exhibit 3 2 3 Central Core Plane Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area EIR 1 lichael Brandman Associt ---PAGE BREAK--- ATUJheim Reson Specific Plan ElR e Please refer to Section 5 6 Setback Realm of the Specific Plan and Exhibit 5 8 2a Half Street Cross Section Key for setback requirements at specific locations within the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area Operational Conflicts with Surrounding Land Uses Implementation ofthe Specific Plan would facilitate hotelmotel development withintwo areas adjacent to residential land uses Refer to Exhibit s 3 2 1 and 3 2 2 Because residential land uses are sensitive to the characteristics of other types of land uses such as density bulk appearance and noise development within the Specific Plan area adjacent to existing residential land uses would result in significant ongoing operational and land use compatibility impacts with surrounding uses The three areas of potential impact are discussed below The highest density permitted within the Specific Plan area is within the area designated for Convention Center Medium Density Hotel uses surrounding the Anaheim Convention Center Sleeifie Plan 5t11d ailv dU IU vf u l 96 Ilt in th numbCL 6f FeeN iR the rnn nt eR eeRIer area Potentially sensitive single and multi family residential uses are located south of the Convention Center Compatibility impacts would depend upon the design of future l developments and the buffering between the hotel and residential uses Future development in this area could increase the number ofbuildings visible from the residential area and cause a visual impact Because the residential area is physically separated from the Anaheim Reson development areas hotel operations are not anticipated to significandy affect the residents Final site plan review would be required to ensure that future developments are consistent with the design guidelines and development standards of the Specific Plan The area nonbeast of 1 5 and nonb ofBall Road is proposed for low density hotel motel development However because existing uses include only 236 hotel motel rooms up to 1 429 rooms could be added in this area Hotelmotel and sory uses could replace the existing RV park and agricultural use on the eastern ponion of this area and would likely present higher density development than the existing uses Additionally residential uses east and south of the 56acre agricultural field could be adjacent to structures that are substantially greater in height and bulk Views could be changed from an agricultural field and a few low rise structures to hotel motel and accessory uses Depending upon design future developments could present additional height and bulk impacts on adjacent sensitive residential uses potentially causing visual and light impacts Noise impacts from hotelmotel operations could also occur although all future uses would be required to comply with the City s sound ordinance The Specific Plan includes design guidelines and zoning regulations for development e CRAlCIlA 3 2 3 2 17 Land Use Compatibility ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR adjacent to residential uses Final site plan review would be required to ensure that future developments are consistent with the design guidelines and development standards ofthe Specific Plan The proposed urban design and landscape features included in the Specific Plan represent a beneficial impact on adjacent properties because ofthe resulting upgrade in the appearance of the streetscape 3 2 2 5 Transoortation Imorovements Improvements to the transportation and circulation network will require the displacement of several commercial uses as described in Section 3 3 2 4 Impacts of Right of Way Acquisition for Circulation System Improvements and in Appendix C l1 arasporAo 4o i pl ilNcs Cc lol s Q Ao CCl Sivu i c k s et it tl oJ s c r4i rVc t i o ui e i O oChlO t2 r 1 1 f o S J v rt cha ts f 4 f 322 6 Construction Imoacts Although construction ofanyone development and or infrastructure improvement within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be short term in anyone location long term cumulative construction impacts over the 16year timeframe of the Specific Plan are anticipated to be significant due to the adjacency of existing mobilehome residences and singlefamily residences along the periphery of the Specific Plan area Long term construction impacts wi11 result from disruptions associated with transportation and other infrastructure improvements air quality emissions noise generated by construction equipment and visual disruptions Refer to Sections 3 3 3 4 35 and 3 11 respectively 3 23 MITIGATION MEASURES MilifJlti8R t 1In 1 11 raio to ap hl rll of eaeh final 3 plan tIK pM aWL eleler shall SHine daRlBUBteti8B selRtJ8MI o iBt aRe lIB 1Rp1i1B11 1dth all eEl 1181elepm8llt MIIUlards iBellldiBg htdl 4ing sefhaee height ltudaNs larttt ieI ireBUBtl IIId desifll pidelinetl as 3peeified in Scctiol 1 9 8f I a 8 the dlR RelgFt 5pl8ifislllu 32 4 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS 1 lBeBtetiSB sf the A RlleFt Splaifie PI 11 1 Bet is iifeellaBd tlSe 88lBpatihili impacts as the EIl ilia PI dees 88t HP e e the e8MIlu eftCS er epclahCIl Dr d l pm Newl eP ture developments under the terms of the Specific Plan could result in indirect compatibility impacts with adjacent residentialusea lo ated south of the Anaheim Convention Center CRAlCRA 3 2 3 2 18 Land Use Compatibility tit e t ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR e and north and east of Ball Road and south of Katella Avenue and east of Haster Street The loss of the prime agricultural land located within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is onsidered a significant and unavoidable impact The future development of this agricultural fie is anticipated to have significant impacts due to the adjacency of residential uses L fer e cn rrv i4Ll t s 0 L I p k fp bQ 7 AJr c o e CRAlCRA 3 2 3 2 19 Land Use Compalibility ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 3 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This section of the document summarizes the technical report Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Circulation Study Austin Foust Associates Inc 1994 contained in Appendix C of the EIR The report includes an assessment of the impact of traffic generated by implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan on the local and regional transportation systems Many of the background transportation improvements discussed and referenced in this Section of the EIR namely the 1 5 widening the Katella Smart Street project and The Disneyland Resort have been previously environmentally cleared through thepreparation and subsequent certification ofseparate environmental documents r JJf t1o s s d r I s 1h 11 1 1A s r f c k 1M v I J w Ar jIJ r 06scr I t o h I1 d A JI Jt I t J tIt s doCcJM Where applicable the information contained in this section of the report reflects information based on the final traffic and circulation analysis presented in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR June 1993 and is hereby incorporated by reference Additionally the information incorporated from the technical report s referenced above has been updated verified andlor validated to reflect the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR Applicable information from the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Circulation Study technical report is herein incorporated by reference This technical report has been independently reviewed and evaluated by the City ofAnaheim Where applicable this section ofthe document also summarizes the technical report The Disneyland Resort Traffic Study Barton Aschman Associates Inc 1992 contained in Appendices C I and C 2 of the Disneyland Resort Draft EIR November 1992 Analyses of the cumulative effects of the proposed plan and other reasonably foreseeable developments on transportation and circulation are provided in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts of this EIR Through a preliminary analysis ofthe transportation and circulation impacts ofthe proposed plan a study area was defined to include all areas that could be affected by significant impacts of the proposed plan and the potentially significant cumulative impacts ofthe related projects 1be related projects are described in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts The study area for the transportation and circulation analysis is consistent with the study area examined in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR and is generally bounded on the north by Lincoln Avenue on the east by the Santa Ana River on the south by State Route 22 SR 22 and the west by Euclid Street It encompasses the proposed plan the adopted Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan areas in the City of Anaheim see Exhibit 3 1 Study Area The analysis oftransportation and circulation also considers impacts from growth outside the Anaheim Resort area as well CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 1 Transponation and Circu alion 01535 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The purpose of this analysis is to identify the traffic implications associated with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and to recommend mitigation measures that will provide adequate levels of service on the surrounding circulation system Traffic impacts ofthe proposed Specific Plan were identified by analyzing short range Year 2 00 and long range Year 2010 traffic conditions The analysis examines average daily traffic ADT on the surrounding circulation system as well as the peak hour level of service impacts at critical intersections For the short range Year 2 00 analysis impacts due to partial completion ofthe Specific Plan are examined based on short range growth projections for areas surrounding the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan while traffic conditions corresponding to full development of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and buildout of the surrounding area are used to evaluate long range Year 2010 traffic impacts Future traffic forecasts for use in the study wereproduced using the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model ATAM a computerized traffic forecasting model that was recently developed for use in acitywide analysis This section of the EIR is organized in the following manner Section 3 3 1 describes the existing environmental conditions related to transportation and circulation This discussion includes the existing conditions of the highway and street circulation public transit and pedestrian circulation systems This discussion also includes the environmental conditions related to transportation and circulation that are expected in the future without implementation ofthe Specific Plan Section 3 3 2 describes the environmental impacts of the proposed project on the transportation and circulation system including highways and streets transit and pedestrian improvements This section also describes the committed and non committed background intersection improvements which were assumed in the analysis of project impacts Section 3 3 3 describes the mitigation measures that are recommended to reduce or avoid significant impacts and committed and non committed improvements that will be required as part of the proposed project e Section 3 3 4 describes the significant adverse project impacts of the proposed project after mitigation CRAlCRA 3 3 3 2 01536 Transponalion and ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR e 3 3 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS 3 3 1 ExistiDl Relional Transoortation and Circulation Svstem Without Proiectl Existing Regional Highway System The study area is served by a system of regional freeways including Interstate 5 1 5 State Route 57 SR 57 State Route 22 SR 22 and State Route 91 SR 91 Of these freeways 1 5 provides the most direct access for the project area Interstate 5 a six lane freeway facility in the City of Anaheim bisects the study area traversing diagonally from beyond the City of Los Angeles on the north to the City of San Diego on the south SR 57 is a ten lane freeway facility inclusive oftwo high occupancy vehicle BOY lanes in the study area oriented in a north south direction traversing from the City ofDiamond Bar on the north to the City of Orange on the south SR 22 a six lane east west freeway facility traverses from the Cil of Long Beach on the west to the City ofOrange on the east along the southern boundary of the study area State Route 91 an eight lane freeway facility with east west orientation is located approximately 1 5 miles beyond the northern boundary of the study area and traverses from the City of Carson on the west to the City of Riverside on the east As part of the widening of 1 5 by Caltrans the interchange between 1 5 SR 57 and SR 22 is currently under construction to improve mixed flow operations and to provide HOV connectors between 1 5 and SR 57 As part of the Congestion Management Program CMP the ocrA has designed the CMP Highway System to include a number ofmultijurisdictional arterial highways known as smart Streets which are planned to be improved to provide increased capacity and enhanced traffic flow Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard the major east west and north south anerial highways serving the project study area have been designated smart Streets The Katella Avenue Smart Street Project proposes improvements including intersection widening improvements midblock widening in some locations on street parking prohibition lane restriping and bus turnouts These measures will provide additional capacity improve traffic flow and upgrade the safety and efficiency ofthe roadway There are currently no active plans to add any major improvements to Harbor Boulevard with the exception of adding raised median islands widening the overcrossing of 1 5 and widening at intersections with Chapman Avenue Katella Avenue and Ball Road e CRAlCIlA 3 3 3 3 4 Transportation and Qrculalion ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR Existing Local Roadway System Existin2 Arterial Hi2hwavs The City of Anaheim arterial highway system is characterized by a grid network of roadways The City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element classifies these roadways by facility types primarily defining the number of lanes within a given roadway The roadway classifications are as follows Major Arterial Highways These facilities complement freeways serving cities within the region and provide for local circulation needs This category of highway requires 120 feet of right of way and typically provides for six travel lanes a painted median or center divider left turn pockets and parking lanes adjacent to each curb Primary Arterial H ighways These facilities provide for circulation within the City and its immediate environs This category ofhighway requires 106 feet ofright of way and typically provides for either a six lane divided highway with no parking or a four lane divided highway with left turn pockets and two parking lanes Secondary Arterial Highways These facilities provide for circulation within the City This category of highway requires 90 feet of right of way and typically provides for four travel lanes and two parking lanes The following roadway classifications were added to the Circulation Element as part of the General Plan Amendment approval associated with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No 331 in June 1993 Modified Major Arterial Highway This category of highway requires 113 feet of right of way and will provide for six travel lanes This designation is applied to Freedman Way between Hast Street and Harbor Boulevard Resort Secondary Arterial Highway This category ofhighway requires 95 feet of right of way and will provide for two travel lanes This designation is a new designation that applies to West Street between Cerritos Avenue and Ball Road and changes its alignment and name to Disneyland Drive from 5 to Katella Avenue Resort Major Arterial Highway This category of highway requires 144 feet of right of way and will provide for six travel lanes This is a new designation that applies to Harbor Boulevard between 5 and Orangewood Avenue 01539 CRAlCJlA J J 3 3 5 Transportalion and Circukllion e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Modified Secondary Arterial Highway This category of highway requires 87 feet of right of way and will provide for four travel lanes This is a new designation that applies to Clementine Street between Freedman Way and Katella Avenue Resort Smart Street These facilities provided improved circulation for local and regional traffic This category of highway requires up to 166 feet of right of way and provides for six to eight midblock travel lanes and landscaped center divider and additional turn lanes at intersections This category applies to Katella Avenue between 1 5 and Walnut Street The existing roadway system in the vicinity of the Anaheim Resort is illustrated in Exhibit 3 3 2 together with existing 1991 observed ADT volumes The project area is served regionally by the Santa Ana Freeway 1 5 and locally by a number of established north south and east west arterial thoroughfares some of which carry moderately heavy volumes Ball Road Katella Avenue Chapman Avenue Euclid Street West Street Harbor Boulevard and Haster StreetAnaheim Boulevard and some of which carry relatively light daily traffic volumes Cerritos Avenue Orangewood Avenue Ninth Street and Walnut Street Performance Criteria Evaluating the ability of the circulation system to serve the desired future land uses requires establishing suitable performance criteria These are the means by whicb future traffic volumes are compared to future circulation system capacity and the adequacy ofthat circulation system assessed For this analysis the circulation system evaluation is based on peak bour data Capacity needs tend to be most important at intersections and the use ofpeak hour data enables intersectioncapacity needs to be determined The detailed forecasting capahility ofthe Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model ATAM allows long range peak bour data on the circulation system to be forecasted with a reasonable level of accuracy Forecasts are made at an intersection level with individual intersection turn movements being estimated Based on these turn movement volumes Intersection Capacity Utilization lCU values are estimated for the a m and p m peak bours Refer to Appendix C Chapter I for a definition of a m and p m peak bours The JCUs represent volume to apacity ratios for the forecast volumes and the assumed intersection lane configurations The performance criteria for evaluating volumes and capacities on the street and highway system is summarized as follows e CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 Transportation and Circulation ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR Level of service LOS to be based on peak hour Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU values calculated using the following assumptions Saturation Flow Rate 1700 Vehicles Per Hour VPH Clearance Interval 05 of an ICU value Levels of Service are as follows Level of Service Maximum ICU Value LOS A LOSB LOSC LOSD LOSE 60 70 80 90 100 As this summary indicates a level ofservice LOS scale is used to evaluate intersection performance based on ICU values The levels range from A to F with LOS A representing free flow conditions and LOS F representing severe traffic congestion Various operating LOS standards have been established which serve both as a guideline for evaluating observed traffic conditions and as a target or goal when evaluating future development plans and circulation system modifications At the regional planning level the statewideCongestion Management Program CMP specifies LOS E peak hour ICU value less than or equal to 1 00 as the operating standard for roadways and intersections on the CMP highway system At the County and local level the City of Anaheim and the Orange County Growth Management Program GMP have established LOS D ICU value less than or equal to 0 90 as the lowest acceptable level of service for peak hour intersection volumes Existil12 Int ollS In order to determine existing operating conditions on the circulation system existing 1991 a m and p m peak hour observed intersection turn volumes were obtained for a number of key intersections in the area Exhibit 3 3 3 illustrates the existing intersection locations that were studied in and around the Anaheim Resort and Tahle 3 3 1 summarizes the corresponding peak hour ICU values Actual intersection turn volumes ICU calculationworksheets and an illustration ofthe existing geometric lane configuration at each location are provided in Appendix C As the ICU summary table indicates each of the six CMP intersection locations studied operates within the CMP LOS E standard and the City s LOS D standard Of the remaining locations only the following two currently operate worse than the City s LOS D performance standard CRAlCRA 3 3 3 7 01541 Transponarion and Circukuion e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e 8n i 0 N 0 25 26 I 27 28 26 lS Ol D N 6 8 Ill Ol l 9 12 8 lJ 17 15 2 L e fN10 S IN b J5 32 40f 6 50 01 Ol Y 01 26 19 2 ASTER 0 N 01 C 0 7 m 7 5 N s 2 v S iI 0 0 2i 22 2 21 21 21 k 26 COLLEGE v 0 10 15 t SUNKIST ZtS o f 5 EIi Iff r 2 tT1 CI aq t cS 3 1 D en5 s en m s S 0C e n Il W s m o W CI D N ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Intersection Number Location I 3 Walnut Ball 26 Anaheim Ball I Peak Hour LOS E E PM PM Existill2 Transit System The City of Anaheim is served by the OCTA and the Southern California Rapid Transit District RTD bus lines which provide fixed route transit bus service throughout Anaheim OCTA has 12 lines serving the study area These routes connect the study area with the cities of Irvine Newport Beach Costa Mesa Santa Ana Orange La Palma Fullerton and Placentia among others The RID lines provide service from Los Angeles County along 1 5 Additionally the study area is served b dial a ride service private bus operators and shuttle bus service between the hotels in the study area and Los Angeles International Airport John Wayne Airport and major activity centers in Orange County Amtrak provides passenger rail service between the City of Los Angeles and the City of San Diego with eight trains per day in each direction on the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe AT SF Railroad tracks in the Los Angeles San Diego LOSSAN corridor see Exhibit 3 3 4 Existing Rail Network Commuter rail Metrolinlc is also provided by the ocrA along the same trackage connecting Iv Los Angeles and Orange counties with daily trains in each direction There are plans to phase in up to five round trips by Metralinlc based on demand Twenty two rail stops are made daily at the Amtrak station in the City ofAnaheim which is located next to Anaheim Stadium south of Katella Avenue east of 1 5 Rail stops are also made at the Amtrak station in the City of Fullerton which is on the main line and receives passengers on cross ountry routes with a direct connection to the proposed project area along Harbor Boulevard byocrA bus lines In JUDe 1992 a clean fuel shuttle service was initiated between the Anaheim Amtrak Station and major employers in the area This will be expanded in 1994 CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 9 Tronsponation and Qrculalion 01543 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e A7U2heim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 3 1 EXISTING leu SUMMARY e Intersection A M P M 1 Euclid Ball 66 80 2 Euclid KateUa 65 85 3 Walnut Ball 73 92 4 Walnut Cerritol 38 43 5 Walnut KateUa 58 62 6 Weat 00Ulh Ball 57 54 7 Weat nonh Ball 52 62 8 Weat Cerritos 28 44 9 Weat KateUa 59 62 10 West Convention 29 29 11 Weat Orangewood 41 62 12 Harbor Ball 65 76 13 Harbor 1 5 NB Ramps 45 64 14 Harbor 1 5 SB Ramps 43 54 15 Harbor Mancheater 47 53 16 Harbor Freedman 41 60 17 Harbor KateUa 52 66 18 Harbor A Convention 29 54 19 Harbor Orangewood 46 60 20 Harbor Chapman 57 85 21 Clemeatine Freedman 32 22 Clemeatine KateUa 52 25 1 5 SB Rampa Freedman 34 52 26 ADabeim Ball 72 99 27 ADabeim Cerritos 46 73 29 ADabeim Freedman 47 63 30 ADabeimlH 73 87 32 H Oranpwood 49 65 34 1 5 NB Rampa KateUa 49 77 35 Lewia KateUa 39 48 36 Slate eoneCO KateUa 50 60 37 SR 57 SB Rampa KateUa 46 45 38 SR 57 NB Rampa KateUa 44 43 Congeation M 10 CMP bipway orki ction locaIion Exceeda level of D Level of 00 60 A 61 70 B 71 ROC 8 90 0 91 100 I Above 1 00 F Source 1991 LA lion IUnl mov provided by City of Aaabeim with Ibe exceplion of PM peok hour for Iocationo 21 IUId 22 wbic b w from Th Dimeylaad Reaort FEIR IUId 1990 oondilioaa A A 1994 e e e e e ee 01544 3 3 10 and CircuJarion CRAlCRA 3 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- II n I i N I J CD om 0 i j j II I I I I l I iliOIiIl oJ I l l I i I I I I Cau GE sTATE 5lJ IST DOUGlASS a svsw f5 liCD I lf r j al I Dn CD 0 g r ol 0 en n tI g U c m c c J c ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Pasadena eerIy Hills p 10 10 60 Los Angeles YOlbal indl Vojo c ii I wt Sourc S ttonAlchman AIIOCiItn lnc 1m Legend rn Anaheim Rcson Sp ific Plan Am Location RMaidc LooArP J I LOSSAN MII1 Michad Brandman Asoo j 00550010 394 Exhibit 3 3 4 Existing Rail Network Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 3 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Existing Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrians accessing or leaving the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area generally are arriving from or walking to nearby hotels and residences and visiting Disneyland or the Convention Center Existing pedestrian circulation routes consist of public sidewalks and crosswalks The highest concentration of pedestrians occurs at the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue where during tile p m peak hour 5 to 6 p m It i estimated that as manv as 235 en ss1 a J tT In tAd 00 f PlIlI str o I c y 1 h n e tfllo c t oO pedestriansAor the intersection by limiting the number of right turn movements Since there are no right turn pockets at this intersection some backup can occur on the through lanes Anaheim Resort Bus Study The City of Anaheim recently completed a study prepared by P D Technology March 1993 that QJr 0 6S J e considered the existing demand for and operational characteristics of private tous buses in the Anaheim Reson area The study concluded that existing private bus operations are shown to have operational problems and result in on street traffic impacts that conflict with the committed and non committed transponation improvements planned for the area referred to planned circulation improvements discussion in Section 3 12 for descriptions of committed and non committed CDl s I I improvements A second pbase of thiS study was completed as a result of these toAthe feasibility of developing a sbuttle system that serves the emire Anaheim Reson area The shuttle system could serve individual hotel propenies within the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area and would provide access to the adopted Disneyland Reson Specific Plan project and the Anaheim Convention Center via a central bus terminal connected to the people mover moving sidewalk thus linking the public parking faciJ ities to The Disneyland Reson The shuttle system could also carry hotel visitors to the terminal for connections to private tour buses airpon sbuttles shopper shuttles etc Two proposed shuttle bus systems were evaluated a demand responsive system where the potential user calls for a pick up and buses are dispatched to pickup and dropoff riders and a fixed route system After consideration of these studies staff is exploring the concept of private bus operations as part of the Intennodal Transponation Center ITC This would eliminate buses stopping in the curb lanes by providing stops at the rrc alJior hotels with onsite areas large enough to accommodate large buses The majority ofexisting hotels and motels are within convenient walking distances of sucb botels or the rrc so that tour bus patrons could walk to the private bus locations Agreements would need to be reacbed among the private bus operators and botels with locations large enough to accommodate onsite operations Airpon bus patrons with luggage would require shuttles to from the private bus locations and the smaller hotels motels This may require private bus operators to introduce sbuttles CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 13 Transportation and Orcularion 01547 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Spedfic Plan EIR into their operations The majority of hotels motels currently operate their own private shuttles and this service could continue These same hotelmotel shuttles could also continue to serve their patrons to from the Convention Center and Disneyland WESTCOT via the ITC It has been concluded that focus sessions will be held with the major private bus operators to facilitate their operations in the rrc 3 3 1 2 Planned Circulation Improvements The analysis of traffic impacts due to implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are identified for both the short range year 2000 and long range year 2010 Table 3 2 provides a summary of circulation improvements that are assumed to be in place by years 2000 and 2010 with or without future development within the Anaheim p ific Plan area The short range year 2000 improvement projectS are primarily associated with the planned 1 5 widening project a project that is expected to substantially influence future travel patterns in and around the Anaheim Resort The 1 5 project is divided into five segments from SR 22 to Beach Boulevard construction is scheduled to begin in 1997 Construction of Segments A and B SR 22 to Lincoln Avenue which extend through the study area of this analysis have been funded and will proceed first For the purpose ofthis study it is assumed that these segments will be completed by year 2000 Important 1 5 widening improvements in the vicinity of the Anaheim Resort include construction of an Orangewood Avenue freeway crossing reconstruction or recontiguration of the freeway ramp system from Ball Road to Chapman Avenue and construction of an HOV transitway system that includes HOV ramps at West Street Freedman Way and Gene Autry Way providing access east of the 1 5 Freeway only The year 2000 committed improvements listed on the table that are not associated with the 1 5 widening project represent intersection improvements that are planned to be constructed over the next few years and for which a means offunding has been established The long range year 2010 no project conditions assume implementation ofthe development plans for the adopted Disneyland Resort and the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan Therefore it is assumed that any circulation improvements required for development ofthese Specific Plan areas will be implemented by 2010 eyear 2010 committed improvements listed in Table 3 3 2 represent the 2010 project improveme that were identified in The Disneyland Resort FEIR No specific circulation improvements ave been identified for implementation as a condition for development of the Hotel Circle Specific Ian Some of the improvements such as the alignment of West Street at Ball Road and the rei ion of Cerritos Avenue between Walnut Street and West Street are related to onsite project design hile others are intended to mitigate offsite impacts due to expansion of the Disneyland Resort AfJI t rndO 6SJ t D S t d c je Q o r0 s acc lI V tW 4 2CHC I s 2 cSo s lr pr c g J e l Jrc J e CRAlCIlA 3 3 3 3 14 TransporUJIion and Orculation 1 o ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR TABLE 3 32 COMMI ITED CIRCULATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Short Range Long Range Location Implemented by Year 2000 Implemented by Year 2010 IDGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS 1 5 from SR 22 to Lincoln Ave Freeway widening project to add multi purpOIe trIVet lanea and HQV ll llnaitw y limp and to reconfigure arterial interchangea I Gene Autry Way from 1 5 to ConIttUct as 61 ne rterial include to 1 Belmore Lane HOV tr l1Iitw y rlimp 1 Orangewood Avenue Conltroct 6lane arterial clOning of 1 51 Welt Street t Ball RQ ld Realip continuou northsouth Irteri f Cemto Avenue belWeen Walnut Relocate north of exillina alipment and and W Street W 5t 1 nott ContlrUloul utwelt Irterial Anaheim Boulevard from H ater Convert to one way northbound to State Street to StJte College Boulevard Colle Blvd fronta roadl Avenuefrom JteUa Convert to o w Y southbound to Compton Avenue to Compton Avenue Ave fronta road INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 4 Walnut Street nd Cerrito ElimiPate Ie of OD IIpart Avenue of Cerritol Aveaua northerly reloatior 7 w Sireme BaU Rood Alip iatenectioa provide triple EST 3 SBT 3 WBT dual NBT I SBL dual WBL NBL dual EBL NBR Ind EBR a West Street and Cerritol ElimitWe eat lea of iDterMCtion and Avenue convert Ihand NBT to NBL2 9 Welt Street nd KateUa AVeDUe Add SBR me WBR 12 Harbor Boulevard aod Ball Add NBR Road 13 Harbor Boulevard IDd J S HI Modify Cor 1 5 NB ramp recoafipratioD add Ramp 3nl SBT me 3nl NBT me provide SBL me NBR 14 Harbor Boulovlnl me SB Modify for 1 5 58 ramp NCODfi ratioa add Ra 3nl SBT me 3nl NBT me provide NBLme EBL 16 HIIloor Boulovanl me Coavtrt Iband WBUWBT to WBL ud Freedman WIY acid 2nd 2nd WBR me 2nd SBL 17 Harbor Blvd ItKateU Ave Acid SBR WBR NBR A EBR 20 Harbor Boulevard and R SBR me acid 2nd SBL 2nd WBL Add SBR lid NBRI CMpmaa Av 2nd NBL 2nd EBL me WBR CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 15 Transponalion and Circularion 01549 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Pion EIR TABLE 3 3 2 continued Shan Range Long Range Location Implemented by Year 2000 Implemented by Year 2010 21 Clementine Street and Convert Ihlred SBUSBT to SBT add Freedman Way SBL and SBR convert shared WBU2nd WBT to 2nd WBT add WBLand 3rd WBT CODvert NBR to ab red 2nd NBT NBR convert Jb red EBLI2nd EBT to 2nd EST and add EBL 3rd EST and EBR potentiaUy will include WB grade separation for Dianeyland R ort parking Jtl Ucture 2 22 Clementine Street and KateUa COnatNct south leB entrance to Avenue Dianeyltind Reaort IOUth parking area convert 2nd SBL 10 lIbared 2nd SBUSBT convert WBR to Jbared 4th WBTIWBR and add dual WBL 2nd ElL EBR NBL NBT and Ihared 2nd l 25 1 5 S8 Ramp and Freedman Elimimte I S ODramp convert uWBR to Convert SBR to 2nd SBT provide free Way 3rd WBT couvert Ihlred NBUNBT to NIL SBR nd add 4th WlW and convert ElL to 3rd EBT 26 Anaheim Blvd and an Road Add 3nl SBT 2nd SBL 2nd NBL and WBR 28 Anaheim BouleVlrd and Halter Modify for iDterMctioa recoDIbUcUon 1 5 S ramp add fronta rod IJlem 29 Anaheim Boulevard Freedman Modify for It I NCODfiJUrstion 1 5 Way freeway and HOV tnnIitway ramp 30 Anaheim Boulev rdlH Convert Ibared 2Dd NBTI2Dd NBR to 2nd Street Ind KiteUa Avawe NBT and add 3nl NBT 3nl SBT 2nd NBL 20d SBL 20d WBL SBR WBR and EBR IAll 33 Mancb Av and KiteUa Modify foru c n ctioDl IlCOGItNetion 1 5 Avenue ramp and road ay 34 1 5 NB Ramp and KAWIa Modify foriD enectioa 1 5 Avenue ramp and fro yllam l 39 1 5 HOV and 0 CooItNcc iaIenectioa 1 5 HOV tranaitwlY Autry W y liMm 1 Note NBL DOI tbboundt fttum laM NBT aortbbou laM NBR DOttbbouad riJbt tum Lane etc for eucbouod IOUIbbauad and 01 lmplemeated upan oltha J5 F y wideaioa pro ets m nuA A B Lona 2010 mitiptioo for the DilMyland RIIIOft IxpaDaiOO Katelll Street ProjIcI improv CraDl CouDl MM M fuoded CoaaMion MaDI emeot ProJram CMP bipy artia llnection 1oc atioa Source AulliD Fouat Auociatel IDe I e CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 16 01550 Transportalion and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The year 2000 and year 2010 committed improvements are assumed to be in place in the development of the respective no project traffic forecasts as discussed in the following sections Sf Ii spe f s I l o lr p av Ts r D b djt o L 1e d rcsv 3 3 1 3 Future Arterial Hilhwav and Intersection Perfonnance Without Proiectl Year 2000 NoProject Traffic Conditions In order to prepare short range year 2000 traffic forecasts in the vicinity of the Anaheim Resort estimates were made regarding the level of future development growth anticipated by the year 2000 in the study area and in the surrounding region For the purpose ofthis analysis the City of Anaheim Planning Departments inventory ofapprov nprocess related projects in the area was used Related projects that are assumed to be fully or partially constructed by 2000 are identified in Table 4 1 Section 4 0 of this EIR Within the Anaheim Resort the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan is assumed to be completed however it is assumed that no expansion of the existing operations in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area occurs by 2000 with the exception of construction of the planned 475 000 square foot administration building Ithas been assumed that the growth in office development in the Anaheim Stadium Business Center will proceed at an average rate of 400 000 square feet per year which amounts to 3 600 000 square feet ofdevelopment from 1991 to 2000 199 I being the base year on which the citywide traffic model has been calibrated This represents approximately 48 percent of the 7 562 800 square feet of office development approved in the Anaheim Stadium Business Center therefore related projects in that area are assumed to be 48 percent developed by the year 2000 Land use assumptions within the remainder ofthe City of Anaheim were estimated by interpolating between existing 1991 and 2010 data from the citywide traffic model For portions of the study area located outside of the City of Anaheim data was taken from the year 2000 version of the Orange County Traffic Analysis Model OCfAM U Year 2000 traffic forecasts were prepared using the citywide traffic model based on these land use assumptions and the year 2000 highway netWork discussed earlier and assuming achievement of an areawide 1 35 work trip average vehicle ridership AVR see page 3 3 Daily traffic volume projections for no project conditions are illustrated in Exhibit 3 3 5 Peak hour intersection turn volumes were also prepared for this scenario and levels ofservice which include implementation of the committed intersection improvements were calculated for background growth under the no project scenario The resulting year 2000 no project peak hour lCU values are summarized in Table 3 3 3 together with existing ICU values for comparison CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 17 Transporralion and Orculalion 01551 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 3 3 EXISTING 2000 2010 ICU SUMMARY NOPROJECT 2000 2010 Existing No Project No Project Location A M P M A M P M A M P M I Euclid BaU 66 80 74 89 1 03 103 Z Euclid Ie KateUa 65 85 78 98 74 82 3 Walnut Bill 73 92 75 9 89 LIS 4 Walnut Cerrito 38 43 33 33 A5 52 5 Walnul KlleU 58 62 58 83 79 92 6 Welt IOUth Ball 57 54 65 62 7 WNt north Ball 52 62 63 86 76 9 8 Welt Cerrito 28 44 33 A3 36 78 9 Welt ItKarella 59 62 71 77 78 93 10 Welt Convention 29 29 37 34 SO 56 11 Welt Orangewood Al 62 56 77 55 113 tZ Harbor Ball 65 76 70 97 81 1 14 13 H lrbor 1 5 NBRampSl 45 64 44 53 A2 67 14 Harbor I S S8 Ramp l A3 54 62 59 65 65 15 H rbor Manchuter 47 53 A6 54 A2 64 16 H rbor Freedman 41 60 49 70 34 53 17 Harbor 1Cate11 52 66 63 68 I OJ 69 18 Harbor Convention 29 54 27 58 Al 58 19 H rbor Onnaewood 4 60 55 77 61 80 20 Harbor Chapman 57 85 56 81 70 72 21 Freedman 32 23 24 19 31 22 CI Kolella 52 40 57 76 67 25 1 5 S8 Ramp FNedrnan 34 52 19 36 28 4 26 Anaheim Ball 72 99 98 80 85 96 27 Anaheim Cerritoa 4 73 39 63 51 9 Z8 Anaheim H r 37 SO A7 68 29 Anaheim Freedman 47 63 45 60 55 68 30 AnaheimIHaater to c 73 87 61 67 98 79 32 Hallter Oranpwood 49 65 69 76 90 119 33 KateUI 70 68 101 57 34 1 5 HI Ramp Ka u 1 49 77 63 62 82 85 35 Lewi KateUa 39 48 58 94 78 1 04 36 Stile Collep KateUa SO 60 SO 79 74 I OS 37 SR 57 sa Ramp KoIel1a 4 45 51 60 61 60 38 SR 57 NB Ramp KoIel1a 44 43 49 58 57 62 39 J S HOV RAmp 0Autry 17 17 22 19 CODpltioa ldanIpmeIIl ProaniD CMP bip ay DetWort iDtenectioa location ICU 1De imp of idealifitld 2000 comaIitted ICU auulDe imp bOft of idaitied 2000 commiaed 2000 dOlKOmmiued and 2010 committed improvemenu Exceed lnel of MI Yicec 0 CMP vel of E pwf onnaDee td Level of mce raapI 00 60 A 61 70 a 71 80 C 11 900 91 LOll E Above LOll F Souree Au tiD Fou Auociatel IDe 1994 e 01552 3 18 Transponarion and Circulmion CRAlCRA ---PAGE BREAK--- 61 n i 26 3 EUQI 32 E 3D I CD A 6 il 8 3 CD 0 7 2 MNJT 3 6 CD 3 7 lEST 6 i i I h 39 36 2 il 51 8 51 I Qi 9 26 19 1 HA51EJl 24 O 0 22 5 9 6 5 0 0 il 0 1 CliYDii 33 33 26 22 23 26 STATE J B 12 10 SUNKIST 22 f SSto 11 5 lf tvoOo C l rg CD 3 l lS I g ij T 0Ii 0 W I m n W 55 u Itf r ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR e The 2000 lane configurations which include short range committed improvements and actual intersection turn volumes can be found in Appendix C Detailed ICU calculation worksheets are an appendix to Appendix C available for review at the City of Anaheim Public Works Enginee l Department As Table 3 3 indicates the following five intersections are projected to operate worse than the LOS D standard under year 2000 no project conditions Intersection Number Location Peak Hour LOS 2 Euclid Katella PM E 3 Walnut Ball PM E 12 Harbor Ball PM E 26 Anaheim Ball AM E 35 Lewis Katella PM E A special analysis was carried out to determine what types of improvements are required to address these non project related deficiencies Table 3 3 4 lists the specific improvements that were considered Table 3 3 5 summarizes year 2000 no project ICU values based on the suggested improvements The improvements identified in Table 34 are considered necessary to mitigate background future deficiencies which are unrelated to the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Although the funding of these improvements has not been established it is assumed that measures will be taken to closely monitor the performance of these locations and to verify and implement the types of improvements that are necessary to address deficiencies that may occur over the next few years For the purposes of this study it is therefore assumed that the short range non mmitted improvements identified here will be in place by year 2000 However in recognition of the uncertain status of these improvements the short range impact analysis presented in Section 3 3 2 examines project impacts at these locationsboth with and without implementation ofthe identified non mmitted improvements 2010 NoProject Trame Conditions e A set of noproject traffic forecasts which assume existing land uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area were prepared for year 2010 conditions For this scenario buildout ofthe adopted Disneyland Resort and proposed Hotel Circle development plans is assumed as well as buildout of the related projects in the vicinity of the Anaheim Resort area Land use assumptions within the remainder ofthe City of Anaheim are based on buildout of the City s General Plan Land Use Element For areas outside of the City year 2010 land use projections were provided by the County of Orange as contained in the ocrAM n traffic model 3 3 20 Transport J1ion and Circularion CRAlCIlA 3 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plml EIR TABLE 3 3 4 2000 NON COMl 11JTIID BACKGROUND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Intersection Improvement Number Location 2 Euclid KateIla Convert unstriped WBR to 3rd WBT and add 3rd EBT 2nd WBL 2nd EBL and WBR 3 Walnut and Ball Add SBR 12 Harbor and Ball Add shared 3rd SBT 2nd SBR 26 Anaheim and Ball Convert EBR to shared 3rd EBTIEBR 35 Lewis and KateIla Add 4th EBT 4th WBT and 2nd EBL Note NBL northbound left turn lane NBT northbound thru Iane NBR northbound right turn lane etc for eastbound soutbbound and westbound Required to address deficiencies identified under 2000 background traffic conditions without future development of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Katella Smart 8keet prejeet imprevemeRt Source Austin Foust Associates 1994 TABLE 35 2000 NOPROJECT ICU VALUES With Committed With Committed and Improvements Non Committed Improvements Intersection A M P M A M P M Number Location 2 Euclid KateIla 78 98 61 n 3 Walnut Ball 75 91 71 78 12 Harbor Ball 70 97 70 88 26 Anaheim Ball 98 80 84 78 35 Lewis KateIla 58 94 48 81 01555 CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 21 Transponarion and CircuJarion e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e e e The citywide traffic model was used to prepare year 2010 no project forecasts based on the 2010 circulation system and assuming achievement of a 1 50 AVR for work trips in the region The resulting 2010 no project ADT forecasts are illustrated in Exhibit 3 3 6 Peak hour intersection turn volumes for this scenario were also prepared Forecasted levels of service were calculated based on intersection lane geometrics which assume implementation of the year 2000 committed year 2000 non committed and year 2010 committed circulation improvements For comparison the resulting year 2000 no project ICUs and 2010 no project ICUs are summarized in Table 3 3 3 Appendix C provides illustrations of the assumed 2010 lane geometrics for this scenario Forecast turn volumes and detailed ICU calculation worksheets are included in an Appendix to Appendix C viewable at the City of Anaheim Public Works Engineering Department e e As Table 3 3 indicates a number of locations are projected to operate at unacceptable levels under year 2010 no project conditions including the CMP monitored Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue intersection LOS F in the a m peak hour Similar to the approach applied for evaluating year 2000 no project conditions an analysis was carried out to identify the types of improvements that are needed to address these long range deficiencies that are induced by future non project related background traffic The resulting set of non committed background improvements that were considered is listed in Table 3 3 6 Lane configurations illustrating the result of non committed background improvements are shown in Appendix C Table 3 3 7 lists 2010 no project peak hour ICU values based on these improvements As the ICU summary table indicates the following three intersection locations are projected to remain deficient with implementation of the non committed improvements e Intersection NumberlLocation Peak Hour LOS 12 Harbor B PM F 33 Manchester fatella AM F 35 Lewis Catella PM E e For the Manchester AvenueIKatella Avenue intersection no feasible improvements could be determined beyond those planned as pan of the 1 5 widening project e Since the non committed improvements represent future improvements that do not have secured funding sources the long range year 2010 impact analysis that is discussed in the following section examines project impacts both with and without implementation ofthese improvements The project s responsibility for funding and or implementation of the identified short range and long range non committed improvements is discussed in Section 3 3 3 ee CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 22 Transportalion and Circukuion 01556 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR TABLE 3 3i 2010 NON COMJ uruill BACKGROUND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Intersection Number Location improvements I Euclid Ball Convert EBR to shared 3rd EBT EBR convert unstriped WBR to shared 3rd WBT WBR and add 2nd EBL and 2nd WBL 3 Walnut Ball Convert shared to SBT convert unstriped EBR to shared 3rd EBTIEBR convert WBR to shared 3rd WBT WBR add SBL and eliminate N S split phasing 5 Walnut Katella Convert shared WBL 2nd WBT to 2nd WBT convert WBR to shared 3rd WBTIWBR and add WBL and 3rd EBT 7 West Ball Convert WBR to shared 3rd WBTIWBR 9 West Katena Add 2nd EBL II West Orangewood Convert shared to WBT convert WBR to shared 2nd WBT WBR and add WBL 12 Harbor Ball Add 3rd NBT 4th WBT and 2nd SBL 17 Harbor Katena Convert 3rd NBT to shared 3rd NBT 2nd NBR 26 Anaheim Ball Add 2nd WBL 2nd ESL and EBR 27 Anaheim Cerritos Convert WBT to shared WBT 2nd WBR 30 AnaheimlHaster Convert EBR to shared 4th EBTIEBR Katena 32 Haster Orangewood Convert unstriped NBR to shared 3rd NBTINBR and add 3rd SBT 2nd WBL 2nd EBL and SBR 35 Lewis Katena Convert SBR to shared 2nd SBT SBR and add 2nd NBT 2nd SBL and 2nd NBL 36 State Cone2e Katena Add and NBR Note NBL northbound left tum lane NBT northbound tbru Iane NBR northbound rigbt tum lane etC for eastbound southbound and westbound I Required to address deficiencies identified under 2010 background traffic conditions without future development of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Katena Smatt Street Project improvement Not required for circulation alternatives which assume construction of Gene Autry Way between Haster Street and the 1 5 Freeway refer to alternatives analysis in Appendix C Not required for circulation alternatives which assume construction of Clementine Street from Katena Avenue to Orangewood Avenue and the extension of Convention Way from Harbor Boulevard to Haster Street refer to alternatives analysis in Appendix C Congestion Management Program CMP highway netWork intersection location Source Austin Foust Associates Inc 1994 CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 23 01557 Transponation and Circulalion e e I ---PAGE BREAK--- e tZ E t I 29 ElaJ 36 32 1 1 3 6 N N 0 9 8 8 18 19 24 1L 29 1 Vo e t 40 36 41 I 51 43 45 28 I 0 N 7 32 29 37 o 0 0 9 12 8 LA a f 36 43 44 35 29 31 ST 35 0 COIllE t 5 d 13 17 CJ1 SUNKIST iWiASS 27f B9S O ic S 1Il Ii IIf r No o l3b J 5 5 i l 3 D JP en o I zm 0 0 S 5 0 6 J2 0 Co J m b Co n Xl en ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 3 2010 lCU SUMMARY NOPROJECT PLUS NON COMl 11nw IMPROVEMENTS 2010 No Project 2010 No Project Plus Improvements Intersection Number Location A M P M A M P M 1 Euclid Ball 103 103 81 86 3 Walnut Ball 89 1 5 66 86 5 Walnut Katella 79 92 62 80 7 West Ball 76 91 76 81 9 West Katella 78 93 78 82 11 West Orangewood 55 1 3 54 76 12 Harbor Ball 81 1 4 78 103 17 Harbor Katella 101 69 74 69 26 Anaheim Ball 85 96 75 88 27 Anaheim Cerritos 51 91 51 85 30 AnaheimHaster l o i1 98 79 88 78 32 Haster Orangewood 90 1 9 73 82 33 Manchester Katella 101 58 0115 5S 35 Lewis Katella 78 104 65 92 36 State College Katella 74 105 74 88 I Congestion Management Program CMP highway network intersection location ICUs assume implementation of identified 2000 committed 2000 noni Ommitted and 2010 committed improvements ICUs assume implementation of identified 2000 committed 2000 noni Ommitted and 2010 committed improvements plus the 2010 noni Ommitted background improvements listed in Appendix C Exceeds level of service D Exceeds CMP level of service E performance standard Level of service ranges 00 60 A 61 70 B 71 80 C 81 90 D 91 100 E Above 100 F Source Austin Foust Associates 1994 eRACRA 3 3 3 3 25 TransponDlion and Orcukuion 01559 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Existing Transit System PerConnance Without Project The ocrA carries approximately 40 000 000 passengers per year on its fixed bus route system and dial a ride service Systemwide the ocrA buses carry approximately 53 percent of their capacity on average although a few routes in and around the City of Anaheim continue to operate over capacity in the peak period Average peak hour operating speed is approximately 13 mph which is typical of the Los Angeles metropolitan area The OcrA RID and private transit services in the City of Anaheim currently carry less than 2 percent of all City trips and just over 1 percent of all trips to and from the study area Citywide the public transit systems carry an estimated 3 percent of all work trips and about 25 percent of all countywide transit trips are for the purpose ofwork These rates apply to the study area as well Six percent of all public transit trips within Orange County are to from the proposed project area Fifty two public buses operate in the proposed project area during the peak morning and afternoon hours Average weekday public transit boardings throughout the proposed project area are approximately 7 200 The peak period for ocrA bus service and bus service in the study area is earlier 3 to 5 p m than the general commute hour The Amtrak intercity and ocrA commuter rail service carries approximately 4 000 passengers per day through Orange County The peak service occurs early in the morning and between 5 p m and 7 p m in the evenings The closest rail station to the proposed project area is at Anaheim Stadium Over 500 rail boardings a1ightings occur each day at this station 32 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section describes the land use and trip generation characteristics associated with the development plans which are proposed for the Anaheim Reson area Additionally this section describes the forecast future traffic conditions for the study area with implementation of the proposed plan in the year 2000 and the year 2010 thus discussing the impacts of the proposed plan and where the impact will be significant to the environment The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan is divided into 26 planning areas for transportation modeling purposes as illustrated in Exhibit 3 3 7 The development plan proposed for the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area primarily involves new construction or intensification ofreson hotel use at various densities Ie hotel rooms per gross acre within each planning area e 01560 CIlAJCRA 3 3 3 3 26 Transportation and ---PAGE BREAK--- It J o i 15 14 e i Anaheim Raort Ilouaduy Anaheim Raort SpcQ PIaa PIanoiacAm Anaheim Raort SpcciIic PIaa Tnffic Modd PIanoiacAm Nuinbcr Nolc TraJIic ModcI Pbnninc Alasdnioolliw pbMiasr aJlUIP I only 3 3 27 Exhibit 3 3 7 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Model Planning Areas Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIRe M 1 Michael BrwIman AssocialCl 00550010 6194 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Table 3 3 8 summarizes the existing and proposed land uses for each planning area together with land use totals for the entire Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area As the table indicates around 17 000 additional resort hotel rooms are proposed to be developed and are assumed to be constructed either in place ofexisting land uses hotel residential and non residential or on vacant parcels of land The proposed plan also includes up to 350 000 square feet of future convention center ancillary development The development plans which have been proposed for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan and approved for The Disneyland Resort areas are summarized in Appendix C The Hotel Circle development plan involves the construction of a 1 103 room hotel district in place of existing land uses or on vacant parcels within the Hotel Circle Specific Plan area The development plans for the adopted Disneyland Resort and proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan areas are summarized in Table 11 2 of Appendix C The 489 7 acre Disneyland Resort development plan involves construction of the 3 350 000 square foot Westcot theme park a 900 000 square fool expansion to the existing Disneyland theme park construction of a 475 000 square foot administration building and 500 000 square feet ofretailrestaurantconvention space a 4 600 room expansion to the hotel district west of West Street and expansion to 2 415 hotel rooms east of Harbor Boulevard Two parking structures will be constructed one adjacent to West Street south of Ball Road and the other adjacent to Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Freedman Way A parking area is also planned to be located south of Katella Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street and will include surface parking and a parking structure The proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan encompasses 6 8 acres and proposes the development of 1 103 hotel rooms within two existing hotels and three new hotels e CRAlCRA J J 3 3 28 Transponarion and Circu JJ1ion ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR TABLE 3 38 ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY Anah Proposed Resort Rooort Pbuming Approximllte Hotel Density Mea Acres Exiating Land Use Pruposed Land Uses RoomslAcres 1 9 8 612 Rooms Resort Hotel 735 Rooms Resort Hotel 75 17 1 TSF Commercial 21 10 2 445 Rooms Reson Hotel 1 275 Rooms Reson Hotel 125 5 5 TSF Commercial 3 46 7 624 4 TSF Convention 624 4 TSF Convention Center Center 358 0 TSF Convention Center ancillary development 4 30 9 2 341 Rooms Reson Harel 3 863 Rooms Reaon Hotel 125 16 8 TSF Commercial 5 30 4 1 533 Rooms Rooort Hotel 3 800 Rooms Reaon Harel 125 2 9 TSF Commercial 6 3 5 229 Rooms Reaort Hotel 263 RooReaon Harel 75 7 56 3 AmcullUral 4 223 RooReaort Hotel 75 8 9 2 523 Rooms Reaort Hotel 690 Rooms Reaort Hotel 75 8 1 TSF Commercial 9 2 7 112 Rooms Reaon Harel 203 RooReaon HouI 75 12 3 TSF Commercial 10 37 9 216 ROOlIIS R0I0rt Hotel 2 843 RooR0I0rt Hotel 75 16 3 TSF Conunercial 3 1 TSF lDduolrial 275 DU Mobile Homeo SiDg1oFamily II 3 44 8 4 TSF Conunercial 340 Rooms R0I0rt Hotel 100 12 35 7 6 TSF Conunercial 350 Rooms R0I0rt Hotel 100 18 0 TSF lDduolrial 13 11 1 4ZZ R R0I0rt Hotel 1 110 R Reoort Hotel 100 15 1 TSF IJlduolrial 14 12 6 1 TSF Conunercial 120 R R0I0rt Hotel 100 IS 11 1 611 R R0I0rt Hotel 833 Roo R Hotel 75 4 3 TSF Commercial 16 16 3 970 R R Hotel 1 223 RooROlOn Hotel 75 ZZ 3 TSF Commercial 17 13 2 105 9 Induolrial 990 Rooau R0I0rt Hotel 75 18 13 2 672 RooR0I0rt Hotel 990 Rooau Reaon Hotel 75 21 8 TSF CoIlllDOtcial 2 2 TSF OIIice 19 4 44 318 Rooau R Hotel 330 Rooau Reoon Hotel 75 6 0 TSF Commercial CRAlCRA 3 3 29 Transponation and QrcuJarion a e o ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e TABLE 3 3 8 continued Anaheim Proposed Resort Resort Planning Approximate Hotel Deosity Area Acres Existing Laad Use Proposed Land U RoomslAcres 20 4 8 260 Rooms Resort Hotel 360 Rooms Resort Hotel 75 21 33 3 236 Rooms Resort Hotel 1 665 Rooms Resort Hotel 50 30 7 TSF Commercial 115 3 TSF Office 198 DU Mobile Home 22 19 74 764 Rooms Resort Hotel 835 Rooms Rcoort Hotel 50 6 1 TSF Commercial 57 9 TSF Office 57 9 TSF Office 23 3 1 136 Rooms Resort Hotel 155 Rooms Resort Hotel 50 2 5 TSF Commercial 24 0 9 29 Rooms Resort Hotel 45 Rooms Resort Hotel 50 25 8 4 254 Rooms Rcoort Hotel 420 ROOIIIll Resort Hotel 50 11 8 TSF Commercial 26 3 Post Office 26 3 TSF Post Office 26 6 0 507 Rooms Rcoort Hotel 507 ROOIIIll Resort Hotel 845 Total 388 2 11 190 Rooms Resort Hotel R Rooms Resort Hotel 624 4 TSF 982 4 TSF Center Center 57 9 TSF Office 206 6 TSF 26 3 TSF Po Office 175 4 TSF Office 142 1 TSF 1ndulllrial 473 DU Mobile Home 26 3 TSF Post Office Note TSF dlouaand oquare feet DU dwelling unit For trip generalion purpoaeo tbe boleI room density for future Center hotel use is reduced by 20 porcto accoulll for a higher than avcrap propor1ioD of vebi ular lripo expected to be goneraled by hotela in die C Ibrougb pedootrian Amount of acreap and number of bocell OOllll wi1I be leu for circulation altemativea which USUIDe construction of Clemenlino SIroOl from KaIeIIa Avenue to Orangewood Avenue or tbe e of Way om Hari or Boulevard to H SIroOl Amount of acreap aod DUmber of hotel t OOIIUI will be leu for cinulation altemaIivea which auume colUltrUctiOQ of G Autry Way H SIroOl aDd die 1 5 FrMWay Does not include requind for tbe pWmod 1 5 FrMWay wideaing DCllIity buod on 1IlPCiOa tbe OlliIling boleI in Ihio planDing will mDllin ullCbanged in die fulU Source AuotiJtFouol 1994 e 3 3 30 Transportation and CircuJarion CRAlCRA 3 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 3 2 1 Trio Generation Methodololv The traffic impacts related to the Anaheim Resort were determined based on an analysis of ADT roadway volumes and peak hour intersection turn volumes for the circulation system in and around the project area Vehicle trip generation estimates were prepared for the three specific plan areas within the Anaheim Resort area The Anaheim Resort The Disneyland Resort and Hotel Circle Specific Plan as well as for other proposed development in the vicinity ofthe Anaheim Resort The technical means for producing vehicle trip generation estimates for existing and future land uses in the City ofAnaheim and the surrounding region has been established in the City s traffic model Traffic model trip generation rates for various types of land uses have been defined and trip generation estimates are calculated by applying the trip rates to quantities of existing or future land uses Due to the unique character of the overall land plan being proposed for the Anaheim Resort special considerations have been made in the traffic model regarding the trip generation and trip distribution characteristics of certain land uses within the project area Also for the purposes of this study it has been assumed that a regionwide increase in work trip average vehicle ridership AVR will be achieved in the future due to adopted transportation demand management TOM regulations The levels of future work trip reduction and the procedures for incorporating the reduction into the citywide traffic model are discussed in the next section The sections that follow discuss the derivation oftrip rates and trip generation estimates for land uses proposed within the project area Impacts of Work Trip Reduction Regulations In order to accoUDt for anticipated increased compliance with traffic management regulations that are currently in effect e g the South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulation IS it has been assumed that an amount of work trip reduction will be observed over the next 10 to 20 years The amount of future reduction assumed for this study is related to the anticipated regionwide increase in work trip AVR and is consisteDt with the reductions assumed in TheDisneyland Reson FEIR No 31I The 2000 and 20I0 work trip reductions as derived in the traffic study portion of that FEIR are summarized as follows Work Trip AVR without strict adherence to TOM regulations Work Trip AVR with adherence to TOM regulations 1 1S6 Work Trip Vehicle ReductioD due to AVR change Year 2000 1 6 US 14 Year 2010 17 1 50 22 Source Austin Foust Associates 1994 CRAlCIlA 3 3 3 3 31 Transportation and QrculDlion 01565 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e e e As this summary indicates achievement of a 150 target AVR by year 2010 would represent a reduction in vehicle work trips of approximately 22 percent and achievement of a 1 35 AVR by year 2000 would represent a reduction of 14 percent These reductions are applied in the citywide traffic model by reducing the work trip generation rates for the various model land use categories by these percentages refer to Appendix C for a listing of the traffic model work trip generation factors Traffic model trip generation summaries with and without the work trip reductions indicate that areawide a m and p m peak hour trips are reduced 8 percent and 5 percent respectively by the year 2000 and 13 percent and 8 percent respectively by year 2010 e The trip generation methodology specific to resort hotels the convention center and the Disneyland Resort are discussed in detail in Appendix C of this EIR Trip Generation Estimates Trip generation estimates were prepared for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan based on the existing and proposed land uses presented in Section 3 1 of this EIR The results are summarized in Table 3 3 9 For analysis purposes these estimates have been produced using trip generation rates which include the 22 percent level of work trip reduction that is anticipated by the year 2010 As Table 3 3 9 indicates the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is estimated to generate around 161 500 ADT an increase of71 percent over the trip generation estimate based on existing land uses The corresponding a m and p m peak hour trip generation estimates of 7 016 and 10 623 represent increases of 83 percent and 56 percent respectively over the estimates that are based on existing land uses e e 3 2 2 Proiect TriD Distribution e As previously noted the traffic impacts due to the proposed Anaheim Resort development plan were analyzed in this study based on both a short range year 20 0 and a long range year 2010 time frame using the year 2000 and year 2010 venions ofthe Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model ATAM to produce traffic forecasts This model allows project specific generated trips to be distributed Ie directionaily superimposed on the roadway system in and around the study area over a cumulative land use and circulation setting for the long range which represents buildout of County and City General Plans Since the ATAM is a subarea derivation ofthe Orange County Traffic Analysis Model ocr AM n and is therefore designed to provide a forecasting capability that is directly compatible with ocrAM n use ofthe ATAM in this study is consistent with the forecasting requirements of the Congestion Management Plan CMP e ee 3 3 32 Transponalion and Circulation CRAlCIlA 3 3 01566 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 3 9 ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIF1C PLAN TRIP GENERATION SUMMARy A M PNk Hour P M Peak Hour lAnd U Units In I Out Toul In I Out TOOlI Am EXlSI1NG LAND USES NO PROJECT Ruol1 Hotel 11 190 Roo 1 231 1 231 2 462 1 790 2 014 3 840 59 291 Convention Center 624 4 TSF 612 2S 637 31 799 830 11 701 COdUllel Cial 206 6 TSF 47 27 74 663 663 1 326 15 402 Office 175 4 TSF 273 36 309 57 273 330 2 566 Indultrial 142 1 TSF 57 9 66 11 51 62 949 Poll Office 26 3 TSF 52 56 108 122 117 239 2 197 Mobile Home 473 DU 47 132 179 137 IS 222 2 171 TOOlI 2 319 1 516 3 135 2 811 4 002 6 113 94 277 PROPOSED LAND PLAN RuortHoeeJ 21 168 RootDJ 2 902 2 902 5 804 4 221 4 748 8 969 140 078 ConventiOD Center 624 4 TSF 612 2S 637 31 799 8 30 11 701 Convention Center lOCillary 358 0 TSF 351 14 365 18 458 476 6 709 Offi 57 9 TSF 90 12 102 19 90 109 826 Poll Office 26 3 TSF 52 56 108 122 117 239 2 197 Toul 4 007 3 009 7 016 4 411 6 212 10 623 161 511 Note TSF lboouod ScIuare FMt DU Dwol1iDJ U Trip ration um 1iad b a baMd on AnaheimTraffic ADaIy i Model ATAM trip tala IIlat include 2 petcenI wort trip TDM nduc tioo y r 2010 cm v Refer 10 text an4 AppeDdix A fordieeuuiona naardiDJ trip rate derivatiOGl In order to aCCOUDI for biPw dwl v proportioa of DODvebicu1lr trip expected to ted by hotell in the Coovaioa C IW 1M propoMd oumber of boml toOIDlI in Ihe c arel w AdUClMl by 20p ceaI prior to caIcuJatiDI trip tioo unteI Source AUlCiJtFou Auoeia 1994 01567 CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 33 Tran sponaJion and CircuJaJion e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR Special considerations regarding the distribution of vehicle traffic generated by guests of the Disneyland Reson theme park are applied in the traffic model Consistent with assumptions made in The Disneyland Reson FErR the following distribution pattern for theme park trips have been assumed 32 percent Within the local area in and around the Anaheim Reson attributed to Disneyland Reson and Anaheim Reson hotel development and other local development 68 percent Distributed beyond the Anaheim Reson local area including 23 percent nonhwest of the area on 1 5 and 20 percent southeast of the area on 1 5 and SR 22 Future Tramit System future transit service in the study area may be enhanced by several Orange County mass transit improvements that are either in the advanced planning or programming stages These improvements include dedicated transit service via a fixed guideway system between the City of Irvine Amtrak Station and the City ofFullenon Amtrak Station an expanded commuter rail network through the City of Anaheim linked to the substantial increase in rail service throughout the Southern California Basin and the countywide system of transitways and HOV lanes in freeway corridors These proposed transit projects are not assumed in the traffic analysis for the year 2000 or the year 2010 since funding for project constructionimplementation has not been fully committed However they are described briefly below to provide information regarding the prospect for substantial future improvements in the regional transit system Central Oran2e County Fixed Guidewav Proiect The cities of Anaheim Irvine Costa Mesa Orange Fullenon and Santa Ana among others in conjunction with the ocrA have initiated a study of the feasibility of a nonh south fixed guideway rail transit project The route under consideration would extend from Irvine Spectrum in the south to Anaheim Stadium and then nonh to the Fullenon Amtrak Station Within Anaheim two alignments CODDecting Anaheim Stadium to Fullenon are being examined 1 west on Katella Avenue and nonh on Clementine Streetand 2 along the AT SF Railroad right of way to Cerritos Avenue and then nonh on Harbor Boulevard e eRACRA 3 3 34 Transponation and Circulation ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort S cijic Pion EIR Transitwav and HOV Lane Svct As shown in Exhibit 3 36 Transitway and HOV Lane System the ocrA and Caltrans are developing acountywide system of transitways and commuter HOV lanes in freeway corridors These facilities would be used by regional express buses regular intercity buses shuttle buses vanpools and carpools Buses and other HOVs would ac cess or egress these facilities at exclusive HOV ramps to streets or at designated at grade merge locations along freeways The ocrA Transitway Development Program has identified exclusive ramps in the City of Anaheim at Gene Autry Way formerly Pacifico Avenue at 1 5 and Cerritos Avenue at SR 57 Transitway lanes through the interchange between 1 5 SR 57 and SR 22 are currently under Exoanded OCTA BI6 Service ocrA plans to systematically upgrade its current bus service and improve headways to meet futuretransit demand By the year 2010 the ocrA bus fleet may double to approximately 900 vehicles This is likely to result in improved peak beadways for most of the existing routes in the proposed project area In addition ocrA is proposing new express bus routes for the proposed project area related to the Transitway Development Program Intercity Commuter RaIl Service The newly formed Southern California Regional Rail Authority SCRRA in conjunction with the ocrA bas identified three commuter rail lines for development through Orange County see Exhibit 3 3 7 Future Commuter Rail Network Los Angeles County to San Diego LOSSAN Riverside to Irvine and Riverside to Los Angeles through Orange County The study area would benefit most significantly by the upgraded LOSSAN Corridor and the routes between Riverside and Irvine however the Riverside to Los Angeles corridors could benefit the study area via shuttle people mover connections to appropriately sited commuter rail stations As shown in Exhibit 3 3 7 the LOSSAN corridor is programmed for double tracking up to seven new stations and a doubling of the existing nine round trip trains The SCRRA will add commuter service between Riverside and Los Angeles via Fullerton Riverside and Irvine This service will be operated as a part of METROLINK the regional commuter rail system operated by the new authority The project includes the development of a new station in the City of Anaheim Anaheim Resort Bus Study The system is anticipated to facilitate ac cess and circulation improve carrying capacity ofthe local roadways improve traffic flow and thus assist in the reduction ofexisting traffic delays As noted in Section 3 1 following consideration of the Anaheim Resort Bus Study the City is exploring the concept of private bus operations as part of the Intermodal Transportation Center ITC Ultimately this may require private bus operators to introduce shuttles into their operations As the majority of hotels motels currently operate their own private shuttles this is not considered to be a significant impact C These same hotelmotel sbuttles would also be able to continue to serve their t fII lJ r patrons to frompisneylandlWESTCOT via the ITC Additionally it is anticipated that this system CRAlCRA 3 3 3 35 TransportaJion and Circulation L e m l8 o ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim son Specific Pion EIR will reduce area wide traffic impacts and by using clean fueled vehicles would assist in reducing local air quality impacts Refer to Section 3 4 for a discussion of Air Quality impacts and mitigation measures Implementation ofthe proposed shuttle bus system is considered to be a beneficial effect 33 13 Future Tl Svstem Short range 2000 traffic projections are presented based on development of a first stage of the Specific Plan and long range 2010 traffic forecasts are based on the trip generating characteristics for buildout of the proposed plan In order to determine the project s potential impacts the traffic forecasts and corresponding level ofservice estimates are compared with the future no project traffic conditions Year 2000 Project Impacts u D y vA CJl Crp T Oo lo r 1 f p rp rs A It S 5 b f r L IDe e af ffd L eAJzooo The amount of project development that is expected occur by year 2000 corresponds to the development projects within the Anaheim Resort Speci c Plan as identified in the City of Anaheim Planning Departments inventory of related projects as shown on Tahle 41 a total of 1 005 hotel motel rooms and a 26 105 square foot dinner theater are assumed to be completed by the year 2 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan related projects together with trip generation estimates associated with the group of projects serves the basis for determining the proposed project s short range year 2 00 traffic impacts Traffic generated in Year 2000 was distributed onto the surrounding circulation system using the citywide traffic model The resulting 2000 with project ADT volumes are iIIustra Exhibit 3 8 Peak hour ICUs for year 2000 conditions are summarized in Tahle 3 10 together sear wia 2000 no project ICUs for comparison ICU values are also listed with and without non committed improvements for the five locations for which short range non committed improvements were identified As the ICU summary table indicates year 2000 development produces ameasurable impact 01 of an ICU value or greater at one ofthe five locations that are forecasted to operate deficiently by year 2000 without implementation of the non committed improvements Lewis Street and Katella Avenue in the p m peak hour The Harbor BoulevardlKatella Avenue intersection existing pedestrian impacts may be alleviated Withra pedestrian overpass ofKatella between Harbor Boulevard and West Street t qll H 0 ro nl ur D l eo 4 Jpb oi Dr e eRACRA 3 3 3 3 36 Transponation and Circulation ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Pkm EIR TABLE 310 2000 ICU SUMMARY FIRST STAGE OF PROJECT 2IlIOlI NoIJ 2IlIOlI NoP 2IlIOlI w bA 2IlIOlI WIPIojoct A M P M M P M A M P M M P M 1 BIIdid 2 llactid K Ja 3 W 4 W CenikIo 5 W K Ja 6 WaIt 7 WaIt 8 Walt CariIioo 9 WaIt K Ja 10 Walt CrWay 11 WaIt o 1Uood 12 H 13 15 NB 14 15 SB IS M L 16 p 17 H K Ja 18 H CaaveIDJa 19 Harhor aad 0 4 20 H 21 r C aDd Pi 22 CL ad 25 15 SB P 40 26 TT c 28 29 IIDIIF 30 n rimlH K u 32 H ano r ood 33 L 34 15 NB 35 LeoriaK Ja 36 CcIIIeF K Ja 37 SR S7 SB K Ja 38 SR S7 NB 39 15 HOV A0 ADlry 74 19 74 78 910 78 75 910 75 33 33 34 58 83 sa 6S 62 6S 63 16 63 33 43 33 71 71 71 37 34 38 56 71 56 10 97 10 44 53 44 62 59 62 46 54 46 49 10 49 63 68 63 r1 58 r1 55 71 57 56 81 56 23 2A 23 40 57 40 19 36 19 910 80 91 39 63 39 37 so 37 45 60 45 61 K1 filI fIJ 76 fIJ 10 68 10 63 62 63 58 940 58 so 79 so 51 60 51 49 sa 49 17 17 17 81 19 910 61 910 71 34 B3 62 87 43 79 34 78 97 10 53 59 54 10 fIJ 58 80 82 2A 58 36 80 84 63 so filI 68 71 68 62 95 48 79 60 58 17 71 78 78 Cv t tr M J Prop CMP highway DC tWork LA cG 1ocMioa lCU aBIIDe of 2000 II J iapovemeGII ICU UIWIIe 11 of fWod 2000 rf aod DOlt 11 I I xceeds level of 05Vice D Level of 05Vice 00 60 II 61 1OB 71 80e 81 90 D 91 1 00 I Above 100 F Soun e AuIliaFoout 1994 61 71 10 84 4ll 78 78 78 82 CRA CRA3 3 3 37 Transponation and Circulation 01571 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e 8E n I 30 1 32 32 U DJCU itn 0 iii B 6 12 11M Cll 7r tn tn 0 6 14 13 17 16 3 WEST i i 10 I I 44 i 52 4lI 52 36 I 40 5 1 Cll 25 26 20 Cll 6 9 i 22 iii 0 l 26 2L ClIWl 26 22 ITAT 41 aNiir 12 B T iiP iCiiAii Ug O g col5 col ogriD I 8 Itlf r No oo c3nII s rocII sa r Tl lal3 II Cli eM en n tl 0 S 0 a n 1 il 2 m n W tl II CC ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Year 2000 CMF System Impacts The Congestion Management Program CMP for Orange County requires that a proposed development project s short range traffic impaas on the CMP highway network be identified as pan of the project s traffic impact analysis As the year 2000 ICU summary presented previously in Table 3 3 10 indicates the implementation of the proposed project for Year 2000 produces a measurable impact 01 of an ICU value or greater at one of the six CMP intersection locations analyzed This level of impact at the Harbor BoulevardlKatella Avenue intersection is considered acceptable since it is forecast to operate better than the CMP level of service E standard Year 2010 Project Impacts In order to evaluate the project s long range Year 2010 impacts a set of traffic forecasts which include full development of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan was prepared using the citywide traffic model Exhibit 3 3 9 illustrates the Year 2010 with project ADT traffic forecasts Table 3 3 1 1 summarizes the Year 2010 with project peak hour ICU values compared with Year 2010 no project ICUs The Year 2010 ICUs assume implementation of the Year 2000 committed Year 2000 non committed and Year 2010 committed circulation improvements The ICU summary table indicates that the proposed project produces measurable impacts lCU increase of 01 or greater at each of the locations that are forecasted to operate deficiently without Year 2010 non committed background improvements with the exception ofthe West Street Ball Road intersection In addition the following three locations two of which have assumed implementation of 2010 non committed improvements drop to unacceptable levels of service when development of the proposed project is assumed Intersection NumberlLocation Peak Hour LOS 19 Harbor and Orangewood PM E 30 AnaheimlHaster and Katella AM E 32 Haster and Orangewood PM E CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 39 Transportation and Circulation 01573 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e An Jheim son Specific Pion ElR TABLE 311 010 ICU SUMMARY WITII PROJECT 2010 2010 NoProject WlProjocl 2010 PI Plu No Proiec 2010W A M P M A M P M A M P M A M P M 1 Euclid and WI 103 103 103 1 06 a1 86 81 a8 2 Euclid ODd KatelIa 74 82 76 86 3 WalDut ODd Ball a9 115 a9 121 66 86 66 90 4 Walnut and Cerritos 45 52 45 57 5 Walnut and Katella 79 92 84 1 00 62 80 66 88 7 Weot ODd Ball 76 91 76 91 76 81 76 81 a Welt and Cerritos 36 7a 37 a6 9 Weot ODd KatelIa 78 93 a2 99 78 a2 a2 88 10 Welt and Convention Way SO 56 54 63 11 w and Orangewood 55 113 60 12 54 76 59 84 12 Harbor ODd Ball 81 11 80 116 78 1 03 77 1 03 13 Harbor and I S NB rampsl 42 67 43 71 14 Harbor and I S 58 rampsl 65 65 66 77 15 Harbor and Manchester 42 601 47 79 16 Harbor and Freedman 34 53 39 63 17 Harbor and Katcl1a1 1 01 69 1 08 80 74 69 a2 80 18 Harbor and Convention 41 58 47 69 19 Harbor and Orangewood 61 80 68 94 20 Harbor ODd Chap 70 n n 77 21 Clementine and Freedman 19 31 19 35 22 Clementine and KateJ 1a 76 67 79 74 25 J 5 S8 ramp ODd Freed 28 46 31 SO 26 ADoheim ODd Ball a5 96 88 9S 75 88 77 89 27 Anaheim and Cerritos 51 91 52 94 51 85 52 89 2a Anaheim and Huler 47 68 48 70 29 Anaheim and Freedman 55 68 62 n 30 AnabeimlHastcr and Kate11a 9S 79 1 03 92 a8 78 93 90 32 Haster and Orangewood 90 119 98 132 73 82 80 94 33 Manchester and KateHa 1 01 57 1 03 63 34 1 5 NB ramps and Kalcl1a1 82 85 84 a7 35 l ewis and Katella 78 104 80 1 06 65 92 67 94 36 State College and Katell 74 10S 75 1 07 74 88 75 90 37 SR S7 58 rampsand Katella 61 60 63 62 38 SR S7 NB ramps and Katcl1a1 57 62 58 63 39 1 5 HOV ram Gene Autry 22 19 22 19 CoOIOltion Management Program eMP highway netWork intcr8cction location leu assume implementation of identified 2000 committed 2000 non committed and 2010 committed improvements leUs assume implementation of identified 2000 committed 2000 non commiued 2010 committed and 2010 non committed improvements s level of service D Exceeds eMP level of service E performance standard Level of service ranges 00 60 A 61 70 8 71 80 C 81 90D 91 100 E Above 100 F Source Austin Foust 1994 01574 CRAlCRA 3 3 340 Transponation and ---PAGE BREAK--- IrH I 29 1L EIJC1I 36 32 i ii 11 13 6 iD 10 19 13 WAUlUT 9 20 21 27 lIST 20 29 I I I I 44 42 52 63 52 52 liD 9 27 35 33 42 iiD ci 19 13 8 ii 41 em 44 35 29 32 36 I ST lI 14 18 sT 9L9 O fIl53 Ilil IIiiiD i itr No O Z3II 5 rg 01 l I en1n tr 2 m II W c CD e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Measurable project impacts are also forecasted at the five intersection locations for which Year 2000 noni Ommitted improvements were identified four of these locations require additional 2010 non committed improvements to address deficiencies due to non project related background traffic The proposed project s relative share offuture traffic at the intersection locations for which noni Ommitted improvements have been identified or which are projected to operate deficiently with development of the project is summarized in Exhibits 3 3 10 and 3 3 11 for the a m and p m peak hours respectively These illustrations show the proportional composition ofeach future ICU value without Year 2010 noni Ommitted improvements according to existing future non project related and future project related traffic shares ICU values with implementation of identified 2010 noni Ommitted improvements are also illustrated for comparison Future Transit System Perfonnance ocrA has forecasts offuture transit service and ridership based on existing trends and funding levels These forecasts show service within the Authority s district increasing by 45 percent while ridership increases by 50 percent over the next 20 years because of the amount of excess capacity available It is projected that commuter rail in the LOSSAN corridor and between Riverside and Irvine will carry between 12 000 and 15 000 passengers per day with 600 to 1 000 of these passengers boarding or unboarding in the City of Anaheim Ifthe proposed future mass transit improvements discussed in Section 3 3 2 2 were implemented by the year 2010 the carrying capacity and overall LOS for transit in the proposed project area would be improved The major impact of this improved system would be the capture of a large number of solo vehicle drivers to the various transit modes greatly enhancing AVRs throughout the area This would improve the roadway and intersection LOS projected in this analysis since this analysis does not assume any ofthe mass transit improvements Recent travel forecasts by the OcrA project that if all of these projects are built transit usage in Orange County would triple by 2010 from approximately 130 000 to nearly 400 000 daily boardings Transit would improve its market share in the proposed project area to almost 3 percent of all trips Because ofthe employment growth in the proposed project area transit ridership would triple over the next 20 years Average weekday transit boardings on buses and the Central Orange County Fixed Guideway System in the proposed project area are anticipated by OcrA to exceed 20 000 in the year 2010 e eRACRA 3 3 3 3 42 Transportation and Circulation ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Pion EIR 32 4 In1pads of Ri2ht oI Wav Acouisilion lor Ciradalion Svstem Imnrovemenls Implementation ofthe proposed circulation system improvements for baseline growth andthe proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will require the acquisition of additional right fway and will result in the partial or complete dislocation of certain uses The impacts associated with the acquisition of the necessary rigbt fway are described in detail and Uluslrated in Appendix C I ofthis EIR Right of way acquisitions are for landscaped buffer zones sidewalks and pedestrian ways with the remainder for travel lanes The acquiSitions are along the following streets c rr s ih r re iIV f tf ts o cc rt A O pC W p ir u oft 5 r4 e f u ft West StreetlDisneyland Drive Ball Road West Street Orangewood Avenue Katella Avenue Pacifico Avenue Haster Street Manchester Avenue Freedman Way Zeyn Street Walnut Street EuclidlBall Intersection Cerritos Avenue EuclidlKatella Intersection Clementine Street Harbor Chapman Intersection Harbor Boulevard AnaheimlBall Intersection For the following critical intersections the following parkway widths ultimate curb to property line have been determined Harbor BoulevardlKatella Avenue The parkway wUl be 24 feet along both Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard Convention WaylPacifico Avenue The parkway will be 24 feet along Harbor Boulevard and 10 feet along Convention WaylPacifico Avenue Haster Street and Anaheim BoulevardlKatella Avenue The parkway wUl be 10 feet along Hasler Street and 24 feet along Katella Avenue Haster SlreetIPacifico Avenue The parkway will be 10feet along both Haster Street and Pacifico Avenue Ball RoadlHarbor Boulevard The parkway will be 9 feet along both Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard Parlcway is defmed as the distance from the curb face to property line including sidewalk and or public landscaping areas Parlcways do not include traffic lanes 01577 CRAlCRA 3 3 3 343 Transportation and Circulation e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e 2 ICUSIiar Future Non Project Rdated lCU SIWe FulWC Project Traffic lCUShare ICU wlNon Commined Improvementt Source Austin Foust Associates Inc 3 7 5 g 11 INlERSEC TlON lOCAl1ON Ru CE MAP 1 2 3 5 15 7 CD 9 Z 11 lIS 12 F 17 m 19 26 27 30 32 33 35 36 Michael Brandman Associates o IOJ VALUE 5 6 7 8 9 La 1 12 Exhibit 3 3 10 2010 AM Peak Hour ICU Shares 0055000 694 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 344 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 2 3 5 15 7 ID 9 I Z 11 lS 12 I 17 19 26 27 30 32 33 35 nffic 36 lCUS Future Non Project Rclutd lCU Shin Future Projccr Traflic lCU SIwt E 3 lCU w Non Commincd Source Austin Foust Associates Inc Mich cl Brandman As50cialcs 3 6 11 INTERSECTION LDCAliON IC UW lCE MAP e IQJ VAUJE 5 6 7 8 9 10 LI 12 1 3 1 4 15 Exhibit 3 3 11 2010 PM Peak Hour leu Shares 00550010 694 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 3 45 01579 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Anaheim sonSpecific PIDn ErR sC w Ultimate way takes to implement year 2010 street improvements not previously addressed O lJAn wl SiT in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR and environmentally cleared will be required atllle intersections f Bo I d d Or ood t o o Harbor u evar an angew Avenue refer to AppendIX 0 l I 32 5 Im c Intersection Roadway and Infrastructure Improvements Intersection roadway and infrastructure improvements will create short term impacts as each roadway segment and intersection is improved lmpre ep l iW i ildalong Roadway improvements with the exception ofthe realignment ofWest StreetlDisneyland Drive and the construction of the Ball Road overpass as discussed in Section 3 8 of The Disneyland Resort EIR will take place over short periods less than 6 months of time in each instance Completion of improvements to the roadway network will require acquisition of additional way impacts associated with these improvements and way acquisition are discussed earlier in this section These improvements will be phased based on a construction phasing plan to minimize impacts to surrounding areas A Traffic Management Plan will be prepared as part ofthe Construction Phasing Plan to minimize traffic disruption e Construction Trips e There are four categories of offsite vehicle trips associated with roadway construction of future developments and public infrastructure improvements within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area employee trips truck deliveries dirt truck trips and demolition debris truck trips The trips will take place over the 16year timeframe of the Specific Plan although approximately 94 of future construction is anticipated to occur between the year 2000 and 2010 The majority of construction work will generally begin at 7 00 a m or 7 30 a m and end at approximately 3 p m with workers leaving between 3 00 p m and 4 00 p m thus reducing the number ofconstruction related trips that will occur by employment activity during the p m peaIc hour 5 00 p m to 6 00 p m Quantification of the number of construction trips associated with future development within the Specific Plan area would be highly speculative and arbitrary at this state of the project however it is anticipated that the eventual number of construction trips made within the project area will be significant e e 33 MITIGATION MEASURES ee Mitilation Measure 3 3 1 Prior to the first final site plan approval excluding signage plans the property owner developer of development forecast to generate 100 or more peaIc hour trips as CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 46 Transponalion and Circulalion e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anoheim Resort Specific Pion DR determined by the City Traffic and Transponation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates shall be required to pay the City of Anaheim for all costs associated with updating the City of Anaheim Resort Transportation Model to include the trips associated with their proposed development This model update will be used to determine and program the extent and phasing of improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development a Ifthe model demonstrates that the proposed development will cause an intersection to operate at LOS E or worse prior to the issuance of whichever building permit necessitates an improvement s the construction contract for said improvement s must have been awarded and prior to final building and zoning inspections for the applicable building permit the improvement s shall be accepted by the City The extent of improvements required for full buildout of the Anaheim Resort are listed in Tables 3 3 2 and 3 3jof this Section 3 1 The property owner developer shall have the option to I wait until the improvement s is constructed by others or 2 construct or pay the actual total costs of the improvement s which shall include the payment for consultantcontractor services for preliminary and final engineering soils analysis right Qf way acquisition demolition relocation construction and inspection and any other related expenses The City Engineer may make the determination that Option 2 may be waived based on the status and phased implementation of the planned improvement s and based on the supporting environmental analysis contained in this EIR EIR No 313 or in supplemental environmental documentation The City may have the ahility to reimburse for the additional expense beyond the property owner developer s fair share contribution of improvement s based on the collection ofother transportation improvement fees or funding through other public sources However if a reimbursement or fair share program has not been established by the City to the extent that the property owner developer s costs exceed their fair share contribution for said improvement s the property owner developer may petition the City Council to establish a reimbursement agreement or benefit district to include other benefiting properties All costs associated with the establishment of any such agreement district shall be at the expense of the property owner developer b Ifthe updated model demonstrates that LOS E will not be exceeded no additional transportation improvement s will be required ofthe proposed development In this instance the property owner developer shall prior to the issuance of each building permit pay to the City of Anaheim all applicahle transportation fees in an amount determined by City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established Mitintion Measure 3 3 2 Prior to issuance of each building permit appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees shall be paid by the property CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 47 Transportation and Circulation e e f8 o e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e Anaheim Reson Specific Pion EIR owner developer to the City of Anaheim in amounts detennined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City authorized improvements provided by the property owner developer and panicipate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established Mitil ation Measure 3 3 3 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance ofthe first building pennit whichever occurs first the property owner developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication with subordination ofeasements including necessary construction easements the ultimate right s fway as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan adjacent to their property P h fen l no P MitilZation Measure 3 3 4J e property owner developer sllall tf fafuel vehieles IIlI Jlnti a1 dAd to th tut fttiilJle 15 EI rmift hI die Cit EagmuF shall join and financially panicipate in a clean fuel shuttle program if established and shall panicipate in the Anaheim Transponation Networ ssociation in conjunction with the ongoing operation of the project Tr r 1 W M et MitilZation Measure 3 3 5 Prior to the issuance of grading pennits for development forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips as detennined by the City Traffic and Transponation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates the property owner developer shall prepare atrip reduction plan for construction crew vehicles subject to the review and approval ofthe City Traffic and Transportation Manager to reduce potential vehicle trips on the road and identify parking locations for construction employees and equipment Mitil ation Mea ure 33 Prior to issuance ofeach building permit for a hotel or motel development in the area designated Convention Center Medium density see Exhibit 3 3b of the Specific Plan C R District Development Density Plan which exceeds 100 rooms per gross acre the property owner developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to the satisfaction of the City s Traffic and Transponation Manager and City Attorney s office to implement TOM measures sufficient to reduce the actual trip generation from the development to no more than the trips assumed by the City s traffic mode1 fer 99 lVVUIi per gruss a hv t It I5f r1 M A Ir OI e S Jr s 3 9 arr O 3 3 b 4 IIOI A t s p 3 3 4 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The project related impacts have been mitigated to the extent feasible but not to a less than significant level Four intersections will operate aUII acceptable levels of service in the Year 2010 with implementation of the proposed project and implementation of the identified non ommitted and committed background improvements These intersections are noted below CRAlCRA 3 3 3 3 48 Tran sponation and Orcularion ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR Harbor and Ball AnaheimlHaster and Katella asn r fUldlR1II and Orangewood Lewis and Katella Significant deficiencies in LOS may occur if future background traffic growth is DOt mitigated by project specific improvements or other improvements or if the Katella Avenue Sm n Street project improvements are DOt implemented t r r s v i fr s u 1 1 9 00 1 CRAlCRA 3 3 01583 Transponation and Circulation 349 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e e e e e ee e Insert for Page 3 48 new mitigation measures Mitillation Measure 3 37 Ongoing during construction if the Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim Traffic Management Center TMC personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services the properly owner developer shall reimburse the Cily on a fairshare basis if applicable for reasonable costs associated with such services Mitillation Me8 ure 3 38 Prior to final building and zoning inspection and ongoing during project operation the property owner developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management TOM program for all employees Objectives of the TOM program shall be Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project generated trips A menu of TOM program strategies and elemenls for both existing and fulurc cmployee commute oplions include bUI are nol limited to the following Onsite Service Qnsite services such as the food retail and other services be provided Ridesharing A computer listing of all employee members be developed for the purpose of providing a malching of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare Vanpoo1ing A computer listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximily to one another and could comprise a van pool Transit Pass Southern California Rapid Transit District and Orange Counly Transportation Authorily including commuter rail passes be promoted through financial assistance and onsile sales 10 encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region Commuter Bus As commuter express bus service expands throughout the region passes for use 00 these lines may be provided for employees who choose to use this service Financial incentives be provided Shunle Service A computer listing of all employecs living in proximity to thc project be generated and a local shuttle program offered to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the aUlomobile Bicycling A Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to employees Secure bicycle racks lockers and showers be provided as part of this program Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options Rental Car Fleet A fleet vehicle program be developed to provide employees who travel to work by means other than an automobile with access to automobiles in case of emergency medical appointments etc This service would help employees use alternalive modes of transporlation by ensuring that they would be able to have personal transportation in the event of special circumstances Guaranteed Ride Home Program A program to provide employees who ridesharc or use transit or other means of commuting to work with a prearranged ride home in a taxi rental car shuttle or other vehicle in the event of emergencies during the work shift Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip An incentives program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips Stagger shifts Develop a compressed work week program which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees Explore the possibility of a telecommuting program that would link some cmployees via electronic means eg computer with modem Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who ridcshare or use transit means other than single occupant auto to travel to work Access Preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuules may b provided Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and or Public Transit Currently Fcderallaw provides tax free status for up to 60 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and or express bus pools Financial Incentive for Bicycling Employees offered financial incentives for bicycling to work Special Premium for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction Ticket passes to special events vacations etc be offered to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool carpool or other trip reduction programs Actively recruit prospective employees residing within a 3Q minute commute shed Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Pion E1R 3 4 AIR OUALITY Appendix C of this EIR The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Circulation Study prepared by Austin Foust Associates Inc was used to prepare the Air Quality analysis Additionally appendices C 0 H and I of The Disneyland Resort Draft EIR contain the technical reports used in the following discussion Applicable information from these technical reports is herein incorporated by reference These include The Disneyland Resort Air Quality AnalysisAppendix 0 1 JHA Environmental Consultants 1992 the Conformity Analysis for The Disneyland Resort Appendix 0 2 Latham Watkins 1992 Health Risk Assessment for The Disneyland Resort Project Appendix D 3 AeroVironment Inc 1992 Stationary Air Pollution Sources Report for The Disneyland Resort Project Appendix D4Radian Corporation 1992 Special Activity Center VMT Calculation Model for The Disneyland Resort Project Appendix D 5 Hamilton Rabinovitz A1schuler Inc 1992 An Assessment of the Employment Population Housing and Jobs Housing Balance Impacts of The Disneyland Resort Project Appendix H Hamilton Rabinovitz and A1schuler Inc 1992 The Disneyland Resort Utility Report Appendix IPsomas and Associates 1992 Anabeim Commercial Recreation Area Tour Bus Study P D Technologies 1993 and Anaheim Resort area Private Tour Bus Study P D Technologies 1993 These technical reports have been independently reviewed and evaluated by the City of Anaheim Analyses of the cumulative effects of the proposed project and other reasonably foreseeable development on air quality is provided in Section 4 0 of this EIR Where applicable the information contained in this section of the report reflects information based on the final analysis presented in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical report s referenced above has been updated verified and or validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR 3 4 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS 3 4 1 1 Re2ionaJ SettiIl2 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is located in the City of Anabeim in Orange County which is in the South Coast Air Basin Basin of California The Basin is a 6 600square mile area which encompasses all of Orange County and the non desert portions of Los Angeles Riverside and San Bernardino counties It is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel San Bernardino and San Jacinto mountains to the north and east Its climate and topography which are discussed below make the Basin highly conducive to the formation of air pollution eRACRA 3 4 3 41 Air Quality 01585 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e AlUlheim Reson specific Phm EIR Climate Reltional Conditions Meteorological conditions in the Basin such as light winds and shallow vertical and topographical features such as surrounding mountain ranges hinder the dispersal of air pollutants The strength and location of a semipermanent subtropical high pressure cell over the Pacific Ocean primarily controls the climate of the Basin Climate is also affected by the moderating effects of the nearby oceanic heat reservoir Warm summers mild winters infrequent rainfall moderate daytime onshore breezes and moderate humidities characterize climatic conditions throughout most of the Basin Differences in terrain cause a number of micro climates to exist within the Basin s overall climate The pattern of mountains and hills is primarily responsible for the wide variations of rainfall temperatures and localized winds that occur throughout the region Temperature variations have an important influence on wind flow in the Basin dispersion along mountain ridges vertical mixing and photochemistry The moderating marine influence decreases with distance from the ocean resulting in and annual temperature spreads that are greatest inland and smallest at the coast Precipitation is highly variable seasonally Summers are often completely dry resulting in periods of 4 to 5 months without rain In winter occasional storms from high latitudes sweep across the coast bringing rain Annual rainfall is lowest in the coastal plain and inland valleys higher in the foothills and highest in the mountains Frequent temperature inversions in the Basin trap air pollutants in a limited atmospheric volume near the ground and hamper dispersion In January a surface inversion exists on 70 percent of the mornings Average wind speed in the Basin is less than 5 miles per hour on 80 percent of the days during the summer smog season this is a measure ofdaily air stagnation Southern California frequently experiences temperature inversions which inhibit pollutant dispersal Inversions may be either ground based or elevated Ground based inversions are most severe during clear cold early winter mornings At this time the greatest pollution problems are from carbon monoxide CO and nitrogen oxides NOx High carbon monoxide concentrations occur on winter days with strong surface inversions and light winds Carbon monoxide transport is extremely limited and highest concentrations occur in close proximity to the source of emissions Since carbon monoxide is produced almost entirely from automobiles the highest concentrations are associated with areas of heavy traffic 01586 CRAlCRA H 3 4 2 Air ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Elevated inversions act as a lid or upper boundary and restrict venical mixing Mixing heights for elevated inversions are lower in the summer and more persistent The low summer inversions are partly responsible for the high levels of ozone experienced during the summer months During summer s longer daylight hours sunshine provides the energy needed to fuel the photochemical reactions betWeen NOx and reactive organic compounds ROC which form ozone Formation of high levels of ozone requires ample sunlight early morning stagnation in source areas high surface temperatures strong and low morning inversions greatly restricted vertical mixingduring the day and daytime subsidence that strengthens the inversion layer The most frequent ozone transport route is from source areas in coastal areas to receptor areas along the base ofthe San Gabriel and San Bernardino mountains Onthe raredays with offshore tlows ozone transport is more limited and highest concentrations occur in the western portion of the Basin High nitrogen dioxide NOlevels usually occur during the autumn or winter on days with summer like weather conditions These conditions include low inversions limited daytime mixing and stagnant windtlows Although days are clear sunlight is limited in duration and intensity Photochemical reactions which would otherwise form ozone are incomplete Atmospheric particulates are made up offine solids or liquids such as soot dust aerosols fumes and mists A large portion of the total suspended particulate fSP matter in the atmosphere is finer than ten microns PMIO As with ozone a substantial fraction of PMIO forms in the atmosphere as a result of chemical reactions Peak concentrations of both ozone and PMIO occur downwind of precursor emission sources Local Climate Anaheim is outside the marine microclimaticzone therefore spring and summer days are less subject to coastal clouds or fog Summers are warmer than along the coast but cooler than in areas of the Basin farther inland The annual mean temperature in the Anaheim area is 62 degrees Fahrenheit with small daily and seasonal variations On rare occasions temperatures may exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit or dip below freezing Winds in the project area are usually driven by the dominant land sea breeze circulation system Regional wind patterns are dominated by daytime on shore sea breezes At night the wind generally slows and reverses direction traveling towards the sea One other important wind regime occurs when a high pressure center forms over the western United States and creates Santa Ana winds from the northeast and east across Orange County to the ocean CRAlCRA 3 4 3 4 3 Air Quality 01587 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR In summer the Santa Ana River canyon northeast ofthe project site is the major orone transport route from Orange County into Riverside and San Bernardino counties Pollutants originating in Orange County are transported by the daytime on shore sea breezes inland where they react to form orone some distance from where the primary pollutants were emitted Wind data were collected over several years at Anaheim by the South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD and its predecessor agencies A wind rose which displays wind patterns at the station is shown in Exhibit 3 41 It shows that a high proportion of winds are from the southwest Regulatory Requirements Air quality control in the South Coast Air Basin is regulated by federal state and regional control authorities The U S Environmental Agency EPA is involved in local air quality planning through the Federal Clean Air Act CAA as recently amended by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 At the state level the Lewis Presley Air Quality Management Act originally adopted in 1976 and substantially amended in 1987 and the California Clean Air Act of 1988 set air quality planning and regulatory responsibilities for the Basin The California Air Resources Board CARB is charged with the responsibility for coordinating efforts to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards and conducting research into the causes of and solutions to air pollution problems At the regional level the SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments SCAG have responsibility for preparing and periodically revising the Air Quality Management Plan AQMP which contains measures to meet state and federal requirements Federal Rewlatorv Reauirements The early federal legislative response to air quality concerns consisted of the Air Pollution Control Act of 1955 the Clean Air Act of 1963 and the Air Quality Act of 1967 The goal of the Clean Air Act CAA of 1970 as stated by Congress in the 1977 CAA Amendments was to protect and enhance the quality of the Nation s air resources The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 the 1990 Amendments are extremely broad The major titles of the 1990 Amendments address attainment ofair quality standards mobile source emissions airtodes acid rain a new federal permit program enforcement and protection of stratospheric ozone The titles that most substantially affect analysis of the proposed project are Title I attainment and maintenance provisions and Title II mobile source provisions e 01588 CRAlCRA 3 4 3 4 Air ---PAGE BREAK--- N NNE ENE w E ssw s SSE Legend Wind Speed I 03miIos per hour mph IIIIIII mph 7 9 mph 1012 mph Aba 12 mph Source CIty of Anohem 1975 00550010 394 Exhibit 3 4 1 Wind Rose at Anaheim 1958 1975 3 45 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Michad Associms ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TItle Iof the aean Air Act Amendments of 990 The goal of Title I is to attain federal air quality standards for six criteria pollutants ozone 0 carbon monoxide CO fine particulate matter pM 10 nitrogen dioxide NOsulfur dioxide SO and lead Pb Federal standards which are established by the EPA at levels to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety are presented in Table 3 4 1 Ambient Air Quality Standards The 1990 Amendments divided the nation into five categories of planning regions depending on the severity of their pollution and set new timetables for attaining the air quality standards The categories range from marginal to extreme Attainment deadlines are from 3 to 20 years depending on the category The South Coast Air Basin is the only region in the nation classified as an extreme ozone nonattainment area Section 181 of the CAA sets the extreme area ozone attainment deadline as 20 years from the date of the CAA s enactment Deadlines for attainment of carbon monoxide and PM10 standards are 2000 and 2005 respectively Title I also requires each nonattainment area to submit a comprehensive inventory of actual emissions as part of a State Implementation Plan SIP revision to demonstrate the means for achieving federal standards by the established deadlines Each nonattainment area must achieve a 15 percent reduction from its actual 1990 emissions inventory within 6 years Thereafter each area must achieve a 3 percent annual reduction Provisions of Section 182 ofthe 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments relate to ozone nonattainment areas and Sections 186 and 187 relate to carbon monoxide nonattainment areas These sections emphasize strategies for reducing vehicle miles travelled Section 182 requires submission of aSIP revision that identifies and adopts specific enforceable transponation control strategies and transportation control measures to offset any growth in emissions from growth in vehicle miles travelled or numbers of vehicle trips in such area to meet statutory requirements for demonstrating periodic emissions reduction requirements Section 187 makes the same basic requirement applicable to carbon monoxide nonattainment areas Section 188 sets forth requirements for PM10 nonattainment areas The EPA can withhold certain transportation funds from states which fail to comply with the planning requirements of the Act Ifa state fails to correct these planning deficiencies within 2 years of federal notification the EPA is required to develop a federal implementation plan for the identified nonattainment area or areas Ie 3 4i Air Quality CRAlCRA3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 41 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS National Standard Air Pollutant Callfomia Standard Primary Secondary Ozone 0 09 ppm I hr ovg 0 12 ppm I hr ovg 0 12 ppm I hr ovg Carbon Monoxide L9 1 ppm B hr ovg 9 S ppm 8hr avg L9 5 ppm Bhr ovg 20 ppm I hr ovg 35 ppm I hr avg 35 ppm I hr vg Nitrogen Dioxide 0 25 ppm I hr ovg 0 053 ppm annualovg 0 053 ppm annualovg Sulfur Dioxide 0 25 ppm I hr 0 03 ppm annualovg 0 50 ppm 3 hr ovg LO 05 ppm 24hr ovg 0 14 ppm 24hr ovg with 0 10 ozone or with 24hr TSP LlOO uglm Su ponded 30 ug m annual 1 SO uglm 24hr VI 150 uglm 24 hr avg Particulale Mauer geometric mean SO 50 uglm annual 50 uglm annual PMIO uglm 24hr ovg aritIunctic mean arithmetic mean SulfOfa 225 u lm 24 hr Ivg Lead LLS uJim 30hr ovg 15 uJim caJcndar 15 uglm calendar quarter quarter Hydrogen Sulfide LO 03 ppm I hr oVI Vinyl Chloride LO OIO ppm 24hr ovg Viaibilily Reducin Sufficient amount to reduce lei prevailing viaibility to leu than 10 mi1cI at relative humidity leu than 70 percent I oboervation Effective 319117 The wu previoualy O IO ppm I hr oVI Effective 911311 S The cIIanJed from 9 3 ppm to 9 5 ppm Effective 71111 S The Ilandanl chanced from 0 0532 ppm to 05 l4 ppm Effective 3987 The chanced from L25 ppm to 25 ppn NOIe ppn puu per miIIioa by volume paler than uJirrr micro per eubic meler L paler than or equal to Source South Coat Air QuaJity M DiIlrict 1992 01591 CRAlCIlA34 3 47 Air Quality e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EJR e e TItle II of the Qean Air Act Amendments of 1990 e Title II of the 1990 Amendments which contains provisions to control emissions from mobile sources includes the following measures to reduce pollutants from mobile sources 1 mandatory use of cleaner reformulated gasoline in those cities with the most severe ozone problem 2 use of cleaner fuels such as methanol and natural gas to meet particulate standards and 3 requirements on auto manufacturers to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons HC and oxides ofnitrogen Section 177 of Title I permits California to adopt stricter vehicle emission standards and allows other states to adopt California s stricter standards e California Clean Air Act Reauirements e The California Clean Air Act of 1988 CCAA amended in 1992 requires all air districts in the state to endeavor to achieve and maintain state ambient air quality standards for ozone carbon monoxide sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide by the earliest practicable date California s ambient air standards are generally stricter than national standards for the same pollutants California also has established state standards for sulfates hydrogen sulfide vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles California standards are shown on Table 3 41 Ambient Air Quality Standards Based on pollutant levels the 1992 amendments to the CCAA divide ozone nonattainment areas into four categories moderate serious severe and extremeto which progressively more stringent requirements apply An extreme ozone nonattainment area is one in which ozone concentrations were greater than 0 20 parts per million ppm during 1989 91 The Basin is designated a serious area for carbon monoxide The 1988 CCAA upon which the 1991 regional air quality management plan was based specified that attainment plans for areas which could not demonstrate attainment of state standards until after December 31 1997 must include specified emission reduction strategies and meet milestones in implementing emission controls and achieving more healthful air quality e e Specific strategies for these nonattainment areas include 1 an indirect and area source control program 2 best available retrofit control technology BAReT for existing sources 3 a program to mitigate all emissions from new and modified permitted sources 4 transportation control measures to attain a 1 5 average passenger vehicle ridership during weekday commute hours and 5 significant use of low emission vehicles by fleet operators The CCAA also includes several additional goals and requirements including reducing district wide emissions vehicular trips and vehicle miles traveled as well as ranking control measures by priority and cost effectiveness no net increase in vehicle emissions after 1997 and a reduction in overall population exposure to ambient pollutant levels in excess of the applicable standards by at least SO percent of 198688 levels by December 31 2000 e ee CIlAJCRA3 3 48 Air Quality 01592 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The CCAA specifies that plans for attaining California standards were to be submitted to the CARB by June 30 1991 Districts were to focus particular attention on reducing the emissions from transportation and areawide emissions sources The CCAA provides air districts with new authority to regulate indirect sources Eacb district plan is to acbieve a 5 percent annual reduction averaged over consecutive 3 year periods in districtwide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors unless despite the inclusion ofall feasible measures in the plan and an expeditious adoption schedule the area is not able to acbieve the required 5 percent annual reduction The 1991 Air Quality Management Plan which contains measures intended to comply with the CCAA was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on July 12 1991 submitted to the CARS and approved on October 16 1992 with some conditions as authorized under Section 41503 2 ofthe California Health and Safety Code Re2ional Reauirements Regional Air Quality Planning The SCAQMD and SCAG are responsible for formulating and implementing the AQMP for the Basin Designated portions of the AQMP which are prepared to comply with federal and state standards are submitted to the CARB for incorporation in the SIP with plans and regulations from other air quality management and air pollution control districts in the state Because air quality plans are prepared to meet CCAA requirements as well as federal CAA requirements they may be broader than federal requirements in certain respects Regional AQMPs were prepared for the Basin in 1979 1982 1989 and 1991 Earlier versions of the AQMP have been submitted to EPA which has approved portions of the Plan for inclusion in the SIP for the Basin However because the Basin does not have an approved Plan that demonstrates attainment of all National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAAQS by the CAA deadlines pursuant to a decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Coall1ionfor OeQl Air v Uniled States EPA July 1 1992 EPA will move forward to promulgate a Federal Implementation Program FIP for the Basin The 1991 AQMP which was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on July 12 1991 was prepared prior to the adoption of the 1990 Amendments to the CAA and was intended to satisfy requirements of the California Clean Air Act CCAA The SCAQMD is amending the AQMP in 1994 to satisfy the 1990 Amendments and to meet the 3 year update requirements of the CCAA 01593 CRAlCRA J 3 49 Air Quality e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EJR e Like the 1989 AQMP the 1991 AQMP divides pollution control measures into three tiers based on the availability of technology Tier I measures are based on currently available technology and management practices Tier IIstrategies are based on commercial development of existing technology and Tier III strategies require the development of new technology In 1993 the SCAQMD adopted a market incentives program for sources of nitrogen oxides NOand sulfur oxides SOthat supplanted AQMP Tier I and Tier II measures for those pollutants for all stationary sources emitting over 4 tons a year of NOx and SOx As required by the CCAA the 1991 AQMP contains a number ofindirect source measures including a revision to the SCAQMD s Regulation XV which requires that large employers in the basin submit plans specifying how they will achieve average ridership targets for their employees during peak rush hours Regulation XV currently applies to employers of 100 or more persons the AQMP proposes various extensions of Regulation XV including lowering the threshold to employers of 50 or more persons The California Legislature subsequently prohibited California air districts from imposing tip4r p reduction programs on employers of fewer than 100 employees until January 1997 Other AQMP measures would require emissions reductions or further control of emissions from various sources including architectural coatings boilers charbroilers deep fat fryers and leaf blowers and would impose additional requirements with respect to fleet vehicles including a switch to vehicles that accommodate reformulated lower emissions fuels The 1991 AQMP also includes measures to control toxic contaminants and global warming precursors including carbon dioxide CO chloroflorocarbons and methane which can contribute to the destruction of stratospheric ozone Air Quality ReguJatioflSfor the Bas n In addition to Regulation XV source specific rules in other regulations most particularly Regulation Xl Source Specific Standards Regulation xm New Source Review and Regulation XIV foxies may also apply to the proposed project Regulation xm requires that net increases in certain pollutants including those for which NAAQS have been established from new or modified permitted stationary sources be offset and that such new sources install best available control technology BACf Offsets may be obtained by reducing existing emissions onsite purchasing emissions reduction credits from sources offsite or in limited circumstances obtaining emissions reduction credits from the SCAQMD s community bank Certain activities are exempt from the Regulation xm offsetting requirements so long as BACT is used e CIlAJCRA34 3 410 Air Quality ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR These activities include among other things replacements with functionally equivalent units emergency standby equipment for non utility electrical power generation and installation of air pollution control equipment Future stationary source emissions such as architectural coatings graphic arts and abrasive blasting will also be regulated by the source specific rules in Regulation XI However SCAQMD is in the process ofextending Regulation XX its market based emission trading program known as RECLAIM for sources of nitrogen and sulfur oxides that emit over four tons a year of either contaminant to include sources of reactive organic gases ROO The revised regulation will cap emissions for sources that emit over four tons year ROO Rule adoption is expected to be completed sometime in 1994 or 1995 Rule 1401 of Regulation XIV specifies limits for maximum individual cancer risks and estimated excess cancer cases due to emissions of toxic air contaminants associated with new permit units relocations or modifications to existing permit units imposes public notice requirements in certain circumstances and identifies the methodology to be used in projecting the risks associated with toxic emissions The SCAQMD has also adopted procedures to comply with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 44300 et seq which requires facilities to assess the threat to public health of concentrated sources of toxic air contaminants Facilities are required to collect and evaluate information regarding the amounts of hazardous substances emitted from the facility Those facilities determined by the SCAQMD on the basis of this information to have a high potential for constituting a risk to human health are then required to prepare and submit a health risk assessment to the SCAQMD evaluating and predicting the dispersion of hazardous substances in the environment the potential for human exposure and the health risks associated with exposure Ifthe health risk assessment indicates that there is a significant health risk associated with the emissions from the facility as defined by the SCAQMD the facility must then provide notice to all exposed persons regarding the results of the health risk assessment 3 4 1 2 ExistiDl Air Oualitv Regional Conditions The SCAQMD samples ambient air at 32 IIIOnitoring stations in the South Coast Air Basin Basin Locations of these stations are shown on Exhibit 3 42 SCAQMD Air Monitoring NetWOrk To 01595 3l 3 411 Air Quality e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e I LANCASTfR I I I I L I I I I SANTA ClNUTA I II IIII I t I I CRESTUHI l 1 AaSEDA IU K SAN IIe NAROtHO PASADENA RIDl ANOS AZUSA UPI NIIJ OHTANA I JII lMONA I ONTARIO J I Rl8DQUX a t r R o AlVlASIOI 8AHHlHI3 LAHAIlRA Nl III LONQRN H L PEMII HIMIT 1 W l Al Il LSIHOAI Wi I I t legend 1Il Anaheim Raort speo iIic Plan Area Loc ion Noo Scale IIIlIIII I i South our Air Buill EJ CoUDI Une c J AirMoniroMc Swion 2J Scarion RopraenlarM ofStudy Area Air Quality Soulce Saulh CoaII Nt QuaIty 00550010 3194 A Q Exhibit 3 4 2 SC D Air Monitoring Network 3 412 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e MiciIad IlnadmoaA ocims ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR determine air quality contaminant levels in air samples are compared to the national and state standards for which the Basin is designated as a non attainment area The Basin exceeds federal and state standards for ozone carbon monoxide nitrogen dioxide and PMIO Ozone 0 a colorless toxic gas formed by a chemical reaction of nitrogen oxides hydrocarbons and sunlight irritates the lungs and damages materials and vegetation The organic compounds that photochemically combine with nitrogen oxides to form ozone are variously described as reactive organic compounds ROC reactive organic gases ROO reactive hydrocarbons RHC and volatile organic compounds VQC For purposes of this analysis all of the reactive gas precursors to ozone are referred to as ROO Carbon monoxide CO a colorless gas that is a major component of mobile source emissions interferes with the transfer of oxygen to the brain Nitrogen dioxide NOa reddish brown gas formed in the atmosphere by a combination ofoxygen and nitric oxide is emitted as a result of combustion At high concentrations N02 can cause breathing difficulties PMIO which is tine particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter causes a greater health risk than larger sized particles since these tine particles can more easily penetrate the defensq of the human respiratory system and cause irritation by themselves and in combination with gases Ozone levels exceed both federal and state standards everywhere in the Basin In 1992 the peak ozone reading was almost three times that of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard NAAQS The Basin exceeds this standard more frequently than any other area in the United States and also records the highest peak readings Federal and state standards for carbon monoxide are exceeded in moredensely populated Los Angeles and Orange counties but not in Riverside and San Bernardino counties Carbon monoxide is produced almost entirely from automobiles The federal nitrogen dioxide standard is exceeded in Los Angeles County tbe only area in the nation which still exceeds this standard The state nitrogen dioxide standard is exceeded in both Los Angeles and Orange counties with the number of readings over the standard fluctuating from year toyear depending on weather patterns PM10 levels regularly exceed the federal standard in Los Angeles Riverside and San Bernardino counties In 1990 the standard was also exceeded in Orange County The more stringent state PM10 standard is exceeded in all four counties CRAlCRAJ 3 413 Air Quality 01597 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Sulfur dioxide SOand lead Pb levels in all areas ofthe Basin are below federal and state standard limits Studies have been conducted in the Basin to examine the cancer risk due to background levels of toxic air contaminants such as benzene trichloromethane chlorine and toluene A SCAQMD and EPA sponsored study showed an existing cancer risk level of 1274 in one million 1274 x 10 in the Basin resulting from background exposure to 13 such air pollutants Local Air Quality The SCAQMD maintains an air monitoring station at 1010 South Harbor Boulevard in Anaheim the Anaheim Station approximately four blocks nonh of the nonheast comer of the existing Disneyland theme park Because the Anaheim Station is within the project study area it closely represents baseline air quality conditions Data from the station for the past 5 years are set fonh in Tahle 3 4 2 Summary of Air Quality Data Anaheim Air Monitoring Station However because PMIO was not monitored at the Anaheim Station before 1990 the EI Toro monitoring station which is located approximately 9 miles southeast of the project area at 23022 EI Toro Road was used to describe PMI0 concentrations from 1988 through 1989 As the data presented in Table 3 42 demonstrate maximum ozone levels over the past 5 years reached about twice the national standard and more than two and a half times the state standard in the vicinity of the project site Carbon monoxide levels were below the state and federal I hour standards every year except in 1991 when one exceedance ofthe state l hour standard was recorded The state and federal 8 hour standards for carbon monoxide were exceeded in 4 of the 5 years for a total of 13 days Nitrogen dioxide levels exceeded the state l hour standard on 2 days over the 5 year period Ambient levelsof PM 10 exceeded the state 24 hour standard on approximately 24 percent ofthe days sampled at the two stations from 1988 through 1992 3 4 1 3 Future Air OuaDtv Air quality conditions in the South Coast Air Basin have improved in recent years Ozone levels in the Basin for the 3 year period ending in November 1992 were the lowest for any 3 year period since the SCAQMD and its predecessor agencies began keeping records e 01598 CIlAJCRA 3 414 Air Quality ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EJR TABLE 3 42 SUMMARY OF AIR QUALITY DATAa ANAHEIM AIR MONITORING STATION PollutlDl SlIndards 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 0 0 Stale IlanIblrd I hr IV 0 09 ppm I br IVI 0 12 ppm Maximum ppm 0 27 0 24 0 18 O ll 0 22 Number of day te ndatd exceeded 53 42 34 41 46 Numberof day federal exceeded 19 13 11 11 22 CarboaM CO State rd 1 hr IV 20 ppm FedenJllandard l hr av 35 ppm State rd lobr IV ii9 1 ppm Fed ra iModIrd S ht IV 9 s ppm Mninwm concenuttion l ht period ppm 17 0 19 0 17 0 210 15 0 Maxinwm concentriuoaa br period ppm 12 0 12 1 117 8 6 9 4 Numberof day l hr 1WIdard 0 0 0 I 0 Number of day federal l hr ItaDdIrd olliceeded 0 0 0 0 Numberof day uteI hr rd nclJeded 6 5 1 0 I Numberof day federal hr ltand lrd exceeded 5 5 I 0 0 N Dioxide No Sla ndanl I 1u aVJ O ll ppm Fodeool n1 0 0534 AM in ppm Maximum l hr ppm 0 21 0 21 0 21 0 20 0 21 Number of day standard exceedod I I 0 0 0 Annua Iridunetic IIIMIl AAM 0 0458 0 0472 0 0469 0 0448 0 0 194 Percelll ftdenlltaDdard exceeded 0 0 0 0 0 s r PMIO s ndanl 24 br aVI 50 uSm Fodeool n1 24 br av ISO uso Maximum 2 ucooccalntiod uJlm T1 II 1511 I 88 Percelll mp m IIUdud II 33 34 14 20 In axceed f ool 0 0 0 0 0 MM Annual AricIunecic uara lllicropaall per cubic ppm peru per mi1Uoa PoUu aaU tboM for wIaicII Souda Coat Air Buill it fedenI iDmuI 1911 89PMIO filr ElToroSloliae 1 1 199I 92PMIO filr Source Cou AU QuoJjIy AUQuoJjIy Daoo1911 ab 1992 CRAlCRA34 3 415 Air QUIllity 01599 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e AlIIJheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The 1991 AQMP projects that this downward trend will continue to the year 2000 even without adoption of any of the AQMP s proposed control measures Pollutant levels will rise above the year 2000 levels by 2010 but will still be below 1990 levels in all cases In making these projections the AQMP incorporated the controls on conventional gasoline powered light duty vehicles that were adopted by CARB through August 1990 The benefits of CARB s low emission alternate fuel program were not included in baseline projections but the program was included as an AQMP control measure and the resulting benefits were considered in projections ofair pollutantconcentrations after implementation of the AQMP The 1991 AQMP projects that air quality in the Basin in 2010 will meet all federal standards but will still exceed state standards for PM10 and ozone 3 4 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Potential air quality impacts of land uses associated with implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan fall into four major categories Constmelion Imoacts Airborne dust and emissions from heavy equipment used during construction offuture developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries OIlerational Relrionallmoacts Emissions resulting from utility usage associated with developed land uses vehicle travel and emissions from stationary equipment that may be used by future land uses Ooeratlonal Loeallmoacts Air quality impacts caused by emissions from traffic traveling in or in the immediate vicinity of the Specific Plan area and emissions from future stationary equipment within the project area which impact air quality in the vicinity are also discussed below Cumulallft IlIIoacts Air quality changes resulting from the incremental impact of the completed Specific Plan wben added 10 related projects These are addressed in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts and in this section 3 4 2 1 S1mlnC2M2 Criteria e Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA Guidelines indicates that a project would normally be considered 10 have a significant effect on air quality if the project violates any ambient air quality standard contributes substantially 10 an existing air quality violation exposes sensitive receplOrs 10 substantial pollutant concentrations or conflicts with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community wbere it is located 01600 CRAlCRA 3 3 416 Air ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Thresholds for Project Emissions Regional Impacts Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impactS of a project are significant and therefore need to be analyzed in an EIR are set forth in the SCAQMD s CEQA Air Quality Handbook approved April 1993 and revised November 1993 The criteria include emissions thresholds and conformity with the existing AQMP Construction emissions are considered significant by the SCAQMD if they result in the following carbon monoxide sulfur oxides nitrogen oxides PMIO reactive organic gases 24 75 tons quarter or 550 pounds on individual day 6 75 tons quarter or 150 pounds on individual day 2 5 tons quarter or 100 pounds on individual day 6 75 tons quarter or 150 pounds on individual day 2 5 tons quarter or 75 pounds on individual day The daily operational emissions significance thresholds are carbon monoxide 550 pounds day sulfur dioXide 150 pounds day nitrogen oxides 55 pounds day particulates 150 pounds day reactive organic gases 55 pounds day Exceedance of state I hour or 8 hour carbon monoxide threshold Cumulative impactS are considered significant unless mitigation measures reduce emissions by 18 percent by 2010 from 1992 levels or I percent a year for projects initiated after 1992 In addition the following secondary effects are considered by the SCAQMD to be indicators of potentially significant impacts e e Project could interfere with attainment or maintenance of any state or federal air quality standard by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected air quality violation Project could result in population increases within the regional statistical area that uceed projections in the AQMP and in other than planned locations for the project s build ut year Project could generate vebicle trips that cause a carbon DIOooxide hotspot Project could bave the potential to create or be subjected to an objectionable odor over 10 dilution to thresholds OfT that could impact sensitive receptors CRAlCRA 3 4 3 417 Air QUIllity 01601 ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Project could have hazardous materials on site and could result in an accidental release ofair toxic emissions or acutely hazardous materials posing athreat to public health and safety Project could emit an air contaminant regulated by District rules or that is on a federal or state air toxic list Project could involve buming ofhazardous medical or municipal waste as waste to energy facilities Project could be occupied by sensitive receptors within a quarter mile ofan existing facility that emits air toxics identified in District Rule 140I New Source Review of carcinogenic air contaminants or near carbon monoxide botspots Project could emit carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that individually or cumulatively exceed the maximum individual cancer risk of 10 in I million Thresholds ror Project Emissiol1i Local Impacts The significance of project impacts depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the project are above or below state and federal CO standards Ifthey are below the standards a project will be considered to bave significant impacts if project emissions result in an exceedance of one or more of these standards If ambient levels already exceed a state or federal standard then project emissions will be considered significant if they increase I bour CO concentrations by 1 0 ppm or more or 8 bour CO concentrations by 0 45 ppm or more The potential air quality impacts ofthe proposed project were assessed using guidelines developed by the SCAQMD in the April 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook the AQAT4 modeling package and emission factors developed by the EPA and CARB 3 4 11 e It is not possible at this time to estimate daily construction emissions that will occur from projects in the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area since neither the specific land use nor the scheduling of construction can be determined at this time Each project will be required to provide mitigation for impacts as described bere and in Section 3 8 of this EIR The purpose of this analysis is to provide a realistic approximation of cumulative emissions and to indicate construction related mitigation measures that will be required for projects in the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area The analysis assumed that grading and excavation will occur over the 16year buildout period However 94 percent of construction is expected to occur between the years 2000 and 2010 On this basis construction in the project area could result in 103 poundsday of reactive organic gases 936 i 3 418 Air Quality CRAlCRA H ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EJR pounds day of nitrogen oxides 73 pounds day of sulfur oxides 552 pounds day of carbon monoxide and 1 462 pounds day of PMIO Without mitigation project area construction would result in significant temporary adverse impacts of reactive organic compounds nitrogen oxides and PMIO Cumulative operational emissions in the project area are set forth in Table 41 Site preparation in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would produce two types of air contaminants I fugitive dust generated as a result of demolition and soil movement and 2 exhaust emissions from construction equipment and employee vehicles These construction impacts can be expected throughout development Fugitive Dust Emissions Construction emissions are associated with land clearing ground excavation and cut and fill operations Building and road construction are the activities with the highest emissions potential Dust emissions vary substantially from day to day depending on the level of activity the specifi operations and weather conditions Nearby sensitive receptors and workers may be exposed to blowing dust dependIng upon prevailing wind conditions 5 The proposed Anaheim Resort Area Specific Plan area covers a total of 5492 acres Grading and excavation will occur e 16 years Assuming that 94 percent of total construction occurs in elI4lftu ao acto af lII e IO YeaJ1 approximately 52 acres will be graded or exposed in any single year According to the SCAQMD 1993 Handbook each acre exposed results in 26 4 pounds day of PMIO emissions Under worst case assumptions that all 52 acres are simultaneously exposed on a peak day daily PMIO emissions will result in 1 373 pounds a day of PMIO emissions Particulate emissions of this magnitude are significant Fugitive dust will be reduced by reasonably available control measures designed to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 These measures are specified in the mitigation section ofthis report Exhaust Em1sslons From Construction Equipment and Vehicles Exhaust emissions from construction activities include those associated with the transport of workers machinery and supplies to the site those produced onsite as the equipment is used and emissions from trucks transporting export materials including demolition debris from the site Exhaust emissions vary substantially from day to day depending on the level ofactivity and the type of land use The analysis assumes that construction equipment will be used 5 days a week 8 hours a day The peak daily construction area of 52 acres is 64 percent of the 81 acre peak construction area CIlAICIlA3 3 419 Air QUlJiiry 01603 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR assumed for The Disneyland Resort Area Therefore equipment and truck emissions for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area were calculated at 64 percent ofpeak exhaust emissions in The Disneyland Resort EIR to reflect lower usage In assessing cumulative emissions Disneyland Resort grading emissions were recalculated using the PMIO factors in the SCAQMD s 1993 Handbook Use of these factors results in a reduction in Disneyland Resort peak daily grading PMIO emissions from 5 702 to 2 277 pounds a day in the Year 2000 As shown in Table 3 4 3 peak day construction emissions for projects in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area without mitigation exceed SCAQMD significance thresholds for reactive organic gases ROO nitrogen oxides NOJ carbon monoxide CO and PMIO Sulfur oxides emissions are below the threshold in 2000 Without mitigation peak day construction will result in significant temporary adverse impacts of reactive organic gases nitrogen oxide carbon monoxide and PMIO emissions TABLE 3 43 PEAK DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS FOR THE ANAHEIM RFSORT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA WITHOUT MmGATlON IN POUNDSIDAY SOURCE ROO NOx SOx CO PMIO Grading 1 373 Dirt Truck Emissions 9 63 33 14 Service Trucks I 2 Employee Vehicles 15 13 147 3 Construction Equipment 79 859 73 370 72 TOTAL 103 936 73 552 1 462 SCAQMD Construction 75 100 ISO 550 ISO Significance Thresholds Significant Impact Yes Yes No Yes Yes Source JHA Environmental Consultants 1994 e CRAlCRAJ4 3 420 01604 Air ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Significance or Air Quality Impacts Due to Construction e Although equipment emissions during construction ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be lower than estimated as new controls are mandated on offroad equipment total direct construction related emissions of ROO NOx CO and PMIO would without additional mitigation constitute a significant direct adverse impact In addition because construction in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area could occur during construction of The Disneyland Resort there will be a temporary period during which emissions associated with construction of that project could be added to construction emissions in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Cumulative construction emissions in the year 2000 are summarized in Table 3 44 Cumulative Project Emissions in year 2000 Without Mitigation Cumulative construction impacts are significant for all pollutants TABLE 3 4 CUMULATIVE PEAK DAY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS IN 2000 WIlHom MmGATION IN POUNDSIDAY SOURCE ROO NOx SOX CO PMIO e Disneyland Resort 162 1 462 114 863 2 277 Construction Emissions Project Area 103 936 73 552 1 462 Construction Emissions TOTAL 265 2 398 187 1 415 3 739 SCAQMD Construction Sipificance 75 100 ISO 5SO 150 Thresholds Sipificant Impact Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted to retlect PMIO emission factors in SCAQMD 1993 CEQA Handbook Source IRA EnviroomelJlal Consultants 3 423 Ooeratlonal Imoacts Operational impacts could result from direct emissions from stationary sources associated with completed land uses direct and indirect emissions resulting from utility usaae associated with these land uses and vebicular emissiollS resulting from employee visitor and service vebicles travelling CRAlcaA 3 421 Air Quality e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan E R to and from the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The SCAQMD significance thresholds for operational or long term emissions above were used to assess the potential significance ofoperational impacts Stationary Source Emissions There will be some stationary sources associated with the project area including emergency generawrs for commercial buildings and hotels as well as cooking equipment All equipment requiring permits from the SCAQMD must obtain offsets for any emissions increases Therefore permitted equipment will not result in any regional increase in emissions Any future development with the potential w result in significant levels ofemissions without mitigation will be required to prepare environmental analyses and to mitigate emissions increases Because some existing facilities within the project area will be replaced it can be expected that new equipment even equipment not requiring an SCAQMD permit or projects for which an environmental impact report is not required will incorporate cleaner technology than is presently used in existing facilities Therefore there should be a net decrease in stationary source emissions with project implementation Q1futi The project is subject to the requirements of SCAQMD Regulation XIII that requires all increases in criteria air pollutants from permitted stationary sources be fully offset at the time that permits for such stationary sources are issued Utility Emissions Utility emissions cannot be calculated without determination of the exact land uses that will be included in the project area However because of decreases in electricity generating emissions resulting from theSCAQMD s REC lAIM Program Regulation XX efficiencies in equipment using natural gas mandated by the SCAQMD and energy efficiencies mandated by Title 24 construction requirements new or expanded facilities will be substantially more energy efficient even at bigher densities Therefore increased electricity use in the project area should not result in a commensurate increase in emissions and depending on land uses may represent a decrease from existing emissions e Anaheim Public Utilities Depanment which provides electricity to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area projects that most electricity used in the area will be generated out of the Basin either in Utah or at San Onofre in San Diego County Should these sources not be available electricity will be obtained elsewhere on the grid system Beca l of the emissions cap imposed by Regulation XX 6 o 3 422 Air Quality ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR there can be no additional emissions from electricity generated in the South Coast Air Basin beyond those already allowed by the SCAQMD annual declining emissions cap Therefore the project will not increase electrical generation emissions in the Basin Mobile Sources Relional Imnacts Mobile sources ofemissions associated with future land uses include employee and guest vehicles and offsite vehicle use These vehicles will result in emissions of carbon monoxide reactive organic gases nitrogen dioxide and particulates Because of the proximity and interrelationsbip of die Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area to the proposed Disneyland Resort it can be assumed that guests in project area hotels and other attractions will share many of the characteristics ofDisneyland Resort guests Hotels in the Anaheim Resort ar also serve the Convention Center hereby resulting in extended stays and fewer daily trips and VMT In estimating VMT for The Disneyland Resort the HR A 1992 study based its VMT estimates on the following assumptions I Local guests to The Disneyland Resort will not represent new trips Trips by local guests will be substitutions for other recreational trips within the South Coast and San Diego Air Basins that would be taken as an alternative to project trips if the project were not built 2 The peak VMT for existing Disneyland tourist guests decreases in the years 2000 and 20I0 because of lower ratios of peak day attendance to annual attendance in those years This results from the destination resort character of the project which acts to smooth out attendance during the year The result is a decrease in VMT for existing tourist guests of 122 123 VMT in the year 2000 and 122 256 in the year 2010 Vehicular emissions were calculated for the project using trip generation factors contained in the InstituteofTransportation Engineers Manual 5th Edition These factors present a worst case analysis because they do not account for the trip reduction benefits of expanding Disneyland into a destination resort where a large portion of daily trips will be made within the project area by foot or shuttle Austin Foust Associates Inc in a separate study for the project area confirmed that the Disneyland Resort traffic assumptions are appl icable to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Refer to Section 3 3 and Appendix C Vehicular emissions tota169 pounds per day of reactive organic gas emissions 527 pounds per day of carbon monoxide emissions 108 pounds per day of nitrogen oxide emissions CRAJCIlA34 3 423 Air QlIIllity 01607 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR and 28 pounds per day of fine particular matter PMIO emissions Refer to Table 3 45 Project Operational Emissions in 2000 Without Mitigation TABLE 3 45 PROJECT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS IN 2000 WITHOUT MITIGATION IN POUNDSIDAY SOURCE PMIO 108 SB7 Project 69 m 28 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 55 550 150 55 150 Are Project Impacts Significant Yes No No Yes No Total trips for each source based on Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition Source JHA Environmental Consultants 1994 Local Imoacts The impact of growth in the project area on local carbon monoxide levels was assessed in The Disneyland Reson EIR This analysis assessed carbon monoxide emissions at potentially affected intersections considering traffic from both the planned Disneyland Reson and existing and future developments in the vicinity The CALlNE4 Air Quality Model which allows microscale carbon monoxide CO concentrations to be estimated along each roadway corridor or intersection was used to identify localized concentrations of carbon monoxide or hot spots Consistent with SCAQMD requirements modeled concentrations were adjusted with CARB emission factors EMFAC7EP Because the highest carbon monoxide concentrations occur in winter when temperatures are low and peak traffic occurs in summer between 5 and 6 p m carbon monoxide impacts were calculated under two conditions summenime peak traffic between 5 and 6 p m and wintenime traffic during the week between Christmas and New Year s Day from 12 midnight to 1 a m which is the peak hour for guest departures from the theme park during winter holiday operations e 01608 CRAlCRAJ4 3 424 Air ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Intersections were selected for modeling based on Barton Aschman traffic studies that identified potential peak traffic levels in the project area These studies incorporate cumulative impacts of related projects Modeled intersections were selected in order to present the scenario representing the greatest project related impacts based on the following criteria an existing LOS of C or better changes in LOS of two levels or more future conditions at LOS D or worse and the largest increase in traffic volume over existing conditions Intersections chosen for summenime modeling were Harbor Boulevard Freedman Way Harbor BoulevardlBall Road Harbor Boulevard Orangewood Avenue Anaheim Way WalnutStreetlBall Road Walnut Street Katella Avenue and West Street Orangewood Avenue The traffic analysis assumed that during peak hour work commute periods all commuters except Disneyland Reson commuters would have an average vehicle ridership AVR of 1 35 As required by the SCAQMD and The Disneyland Reson mitigation requirements Disneyland Reson employees would have an AVR of 1 5 in the year 2000 All coinmuters were projected to have a 1 5 AVR in the year 2010 consistent with requirements ofthe California Clean Air Act The AVRs wereapplied to traffic projections for both 2000 and 2010 AVR was L14 in 1990 CO concentrations were calculated for the I hour averaging period and then compared to the state and national carbon monoxide l hour standards CO 8 hour averages wereextrapolated from the I hour CO calculations using techniques outlined in the Air Quality Technical Analysis Notes California Department of Transponation 1988 Concentrations are given in parts per million ppm at each receptor location Under summer conditions high carbon monoxide concentrations are associated with congestion and excessive vehicle idling and almost never occur unless traffic is higher than LOS D In winter high concentrations can occur when temperatures are cold even when traffic is not congested SCAQMD guidelines specify that in the absence of monitored data current peaIc concentrations at the nearest SCAQMD monitoring station must be added to modeled concentrations to determine future maximum concentrations However because future carbon monoxide levels are projected to decrease as a result of AQMP measures background CO concentrations were adjusted to reflect projected decreases in CO levels in 2000 and 2010 as set forth in the 1991 AQMP In order to calculate total CO concentrations with the project in 2000 and 2010 project related increases were added to twO alternate projections of future ambient concentrations Baseline projections which talce into account reductions in CO emissions that will be achieved through implementation ofadopted SCAQMD rules and replations and Control projections which take into account reductions achieved through implementation of ARB and SCAQMD rules and regulations and CRAlCRA 3 3 425 Air Qualill 01609 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR additional reductions that will be achieved through implementation of control measures contained in the 1991 AQMP for the Basin Baseline projections present a more conservative estimate of future ambient concentrations however Control projections are consistent with SCAQMD assumptions regarding future air quality conditions set forth in the 1991 AQMP Results of the analysis are shown in Table 3 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations I hour for Intersection Traffic at S 6 p m Summer Baseline Projections and Table 3 47 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations 8 Hour for Intersection Traffic at S 6 p m Summer Baseline Projections Intersections selected for wintertime modeling are Manchester AvenuelKatella Avenue and I S southbound onramp Way Results are shown in Table 3 48 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations I Hour for Intersection Traffic at 12 Midnight I a m Winter Baseline Projections and Table 3 49 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations 8 Hour for Intersection Traffic at 12 Midnight I a m Winter Baseline Projections Computer readouts for the CALlNE4 model runs are included as Appendix D l of The Draft Disneyland Resort EIR and are included hy reference herein These CO concentrations are overstated because they do not include the benefits of the ARB s oxygenated fuels program Baseline and Control projections are contained in Final Technical Report VI to the 1991 AQMP titled Assessment ofNlIrogen Dioxide and Cuban Monoxide in the South Coast AirBasin One Hour CO Concentrations at Intersections The modeling shows that in all five summertime scenarios future l hour CO concentrations substantially decline below current levels and both Baseline and Control projections of future CO concentrations are below state and federal l hour standards in both ye ar 2000 and 2010 Under wintertime conditions l hour concentrations increase at southbound I S at Freedman Way over wbat they would be without the project in ye ar 2000 and 2010 However based on either Baseline or Control projections future concentrations with the project remain well below state and federal I hour standards Ei2ht Hour CO Concentrations at Intersections The Anaheim monitoring station is not projected to record exceedances of either the state or federal 8 bour CO standards in ye ar 2000 and 2010 under either Baseline or Control projections even after allowing for projected growth in the surrounding area e 01610 3 426 Air Quality ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 4 6 CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS I HOUR FOR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC AT 5 6P M SUMMER BASELINE PROJECTIONS WITIIOUT MITIGATION pPM e 1991 2000 2010 Direction BueIioc Bueline From Ambient Ambient Total Ambient Total Inlenec tioD Intenedion Concentraliort eo tmion co Concentration CO HarborlKatcUa SW 210 114 1L4 9 9 9 9 SI 11 5 9 9 NI 11 3 9 9 NW 11 3 9 9 SW 210 114 12 0 9 9 10 2 SI 11 8 10 0 NI 117 10 0 NW 117 10 0 WalnutlBaU SW 210 114 11 8 9 9 18 0 SI 12 0 10 2 NI 11 7 10 0 NW 117 10 0 Walnut KateUa SW 210 1L4 119 9 9 10 2 SI 11 8 10 1 NI 11 8 10 1 NW 119 10 0 Weat Duneyland SW 210 lL4 11 3 9 9 9 9 DrivelOnngewood SI 114 9 8 NI 11 5 9 9 NW 112 9 9 Harbor Onngewood SW 210 114 112 9 9 9 9 SI 11 1 9 9 NI 11 3 10 0 NW 114 10 0 HarborlBaU SW 2 0 114 114 9 9 10 0 SI 112 9 8 NI 11 1 9 8 NW 113 9 9 Source Cooaa Air QuaIily ManapD ll DUlrict SCAQMDI 1991 Air Qoa iIy DaIiJ Source projoctiOd reduc tiona Df imp10menlIIinn of ARB and SCAQMD n and reaulationa SCAQMD 1991 A J IP r aI R pon V I oW of Nilrof DID1dtk tJ1td Clll boft MOff Ui Uill tIw Cooaa Air Buill Source IHA I nvinlnmenl l Conau 1992 e CRAlCIlA 3 427 Air Quality e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 47 CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS 8 HOUR FOR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC AT5 6 P M SUMMER BASELINE PROJECTIONS WITHOUT MITIGATION pPM 1991 2000 2010 Direction Bucfine WJlh aleline WJlh From Ambient Ambient Project Ambient Project Intencction Intenection Concenlralion Concenttalion TolaI CO Concenttalion ToIa1CO HarborlKateUa SW 8 6 8 0 8 00 7 0 7 00 SE 8 07 7 00 NE 7 93 7 00 NW 7 93 7 00 AnaheimlFrecdman SW 8 6 8 0 8 42 7 0 7 21 SE 8 28 7 07 NE 8 21 7 07 NW 8 21 7 00 WalnutlBaU SW 8 6 8 0 8 28 7 0 7 07 SE 8 42 6 86 NE 8 21 6 86 NW 8 21 6 93 WalnutlKateUa SW 8 6 8 0 8 35 7 0 7 21 SE 8 25 7 14 NE 8 28 7 14 NW 8 35 7 07 WeIlIDisneyland SW 8 6 8 0 7 93 7 0 7 00 DriveOrangewood SE 8 00 6 93 NE 8 07 7 00 NW 7 86 7 00 Harbor Orangewood SW 8 6 8 0 7 86 7 0 7 00 SE 7 19 7 00 NE 7 93 7 07 NW 8 00 7 07 HarborlBaU SW 8 6 8 0 8 00 7 0 7 07 SE 7 86 6 93 NE 7 19 6 93 NW 7 93 7 00 Source Soulb Coat Air Quality Mana DiIlrict SCAQMD 1991 Air QIIDliIy JQIa Source 1991 AQI T duUcal Rapon VI hs of NiIr Dituidat d C bon Morroxid ill the SoUlh C Air uiII Source JHA EnvironmentAl ConauhantA 1992 e 01612 CRAlCRAJ 3 428 Air ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 4 8 CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS I HOUR FOR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC AT 12 MIDNlGIIT 1 A M WINTER BASELINE PROJECTIONS WI11IOUT MmGATION pPM 1991 2000 2010 Direction Bucline Wllh Baseline WIlh From Ambient Ambient Projeot Ambient Projoot tntenec tion Concentration Concentration Total CO Concentration Total CO n A SW 210 11 4 10 9 9 9 9 7 n u yl KaCcUa SE 110 9 7 NE 110 9 7 NW 110 9 6 1 5 SB OnlO SW 210 114 12 1 9 9 10 3 Rampol SE 12 0 10 4 Freedman Way NE 119 10 1 NW 119 10 2 Source South Coast Air QuaUty Management DiJtrict 1991 Air QIUJIity DlW Source IncludCl projec reduction becaulC of implementation of ARB and SCAQMD rub and feeulatiom South Coast Air QuaUty Management District 1991 AQMP Technical Report VI ADetU af Nllrog Diodd and Carbo M01lOide in the SoMlh Coast Air Basin Source JHA Environmental COnJultants 1992 The analysis shows that increases to either Baseline pr Control projections offuture CO concentrations do not result in exceedances of 8 hour CO standards in 2000 and 2010 Potential Significance of Long Term Operational Air QuaDty Impacts Relional Air OualilV There will be long term emission increases without mitigation from vehicle traffic associated with increased densities in tile Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Cumulative emissions in the project area will exceed SCAQMD thresbolds for all pollutants except sulfur dioxide without mitigation However the City of Anaheim s TOM ordinance will apply to all projects in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area with more than 100 employees and will substantially reduce projected emissions In addition mitigation measures tailored to future developments will substantially reduce currently wo projected cumulative emissions Visitors to the Anaheim Resort have access to other destinations through the use of the OCTO s ulti modal center this further reducing reliance on personal automobile use CRAlCRA34 3 429 Air QUDiiry 01613 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 49 CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS 8HOUR FOR INTERSECTION TRAFFIC AT 12 l A M WINTER BASELINE PROJECTIONS WITIlOUT MmGATION pPM 1991 2000 2010 BaacIinc With Baseline Woth Direction Prom Ambient Ambient Project Ambient Project Inlenection Inteneclion Concentration Concentration Total CO Concentration Total CO SW 8 6 8 0 7 6S 7 0 6 86 KatcUa SE 7 77 6 86 NE 7 S8 6 86 NW 7 72 6 79 S S8 SW 8 6 8 0 8 49 7 0 7 28 On Off SE 8 42 7 3S Ramps NE 8 3S 7 14 Freedman NW 8 3S 7 21 Way Source South CoUl Air Quality Management District 99 Air QIUJIily DaJQ Source Includes dreductions because of implementation of ARB and SCAQMD rules and regulations South Co t Air Quality Management District 1991 AQMP T chnicaJ Report VI Assessmelll of Nilrogell Dioxide and Carbon Monaxide in the SoMlh Coast Air Basin Source JHA Environmenlll Conlullanls 1992 Local Air Dualitv Traffic increases in the project area will IIOt cause a significant adverse impact on local carbon monoxide concentrations as a result of mitigation and because ofdecreased baseline conditions The maximum individual cancer risk resulting from exposure to toxic air contaminants from all related projects is expected to be less than one in one million and therefore below the SCAQMD s significance threshold for toxic contaminants 3 4 2 4 Cumulative Imoads e A full analysis of the cumulative impacts of construction and operation within the project area is set forth in Section 4 4 Cumulative Impacts Air Quality Increases in emissions from grading equipment and vehicles associated with construction in the project area Disneyland Resort and related projects will bave significant adverse impacts on air quality in the short term While stationary sources and utilities will IIOt contribute to adverse cumulative impacts after emissions are offset pursuant to SCAQMD regulations the increase in emissions from vehicle trips associated with the implementation of the Specific Plan without mitigation will contribute on a cumulative basis in both Q o 3 430 Air Quality CRAlCRA34 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EJR 2000 and 2010 to significant adverse impacts on reactive organic gases nitrogen oxides carbon monoxide and PMIO emissions in the Basin Implementation of the Specific Plan will not result in asignificant adverse local carbon monoxide impact on aproject or cumulative basis in 2000 or 2010 3 4 2 5 Conformity with the Air Ouality Man82ement Plan AOMPl Because the 1994 AQMP revision has not been adopted conformity requirements for the 1991 AQMP are still the applicable requirements The 1991 AQMP requires as pan of the environmental review process under CEQA that environmental assessment documents demonstrate that regionally significant projects conform with the AQMP The SCAQMD has defined regionally significant projects to include hotels with 500 or more rooms and sports entertainment and recreational facilities that accommodate at least 4 000 people per performance By these standards the project will be considered regionally significant and must assess conformity with the AQMP SCAG guidelines set forth three criteria for demonstrating conformity ofgeneral development projects job housing balance or equivalent reduction in YMT implementation of Transportation Demand Management fDM measures and conformity with AQMP assumptions including no significant negative impact on air quality mitigation of negative air quality impacts and analysis of air quality impacts on both a city or sub regional basis and a regional basis Based on the following demonstration the project conforms to the 1991 AQ JoblHousing Balance or Equivalent VMT Reduction The Anaheim Reson which includes restaurants and hotels serving both the Convention Center and Disneyland will facilitate longer stays in the project area and less regional travel since all facilities are within walking or local shuttle distance from eacb other The Anaheim Reson therefore shares many of the vebicle miles traveled VMT characteristics analyzed in The Disneyland Reson EIR which found that the project s design would result in longer stays and fewer regional vehicular trips and YMT for future viaitors than are currently attributed to Convention Center and Dianeyland guests Additionally the Specific Plan provides for construction of streetsape improvements and landscape amenities that will encourage an active pedestrian oriented environment The suppon of an active street environment will usiat in reducing auto dependency throughout the Specific Plan area Therefore the Anaheim Reson conforms to the first SCAG conformity criterion by contributing to a reduction in overall regional vebicle miles traveled through enabling future Convention Center visitors as well as Dianeyland viaitors to reduce regional YMT CRAlCRA J 4 3 431 Air Q llJ iry 01615 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR TOM Implementation The Anaheim Resort will be served by aTransportation Management Association to help employers in the area provide transportation information and assistance to their employees A child care facility may also be established in the area In addition the area may be served by a local shuttle service and a new intermodal transportation facility is currently planned to link the area to regional transit facilities These services combined with implementation of and participation in City s TOM Ordinance within the project area and provision of the transportation facilities designed to serve the Disneyland Resort visitors that were described in The Disneyland Resort EIR insurethat the Anaheim Resort conforms to the second of the three SCAG conformity criteria Conformity with AQMP Assumptions SCAG requires that for a project to conform to the 1991 AQMP the environmental documentation for a project must demonstrate each of the following Thenroiect will not have a simificant nellative imnac on air quality in the 10Dl term S years or lon er The EIR has demonstrated that there will not be significant negative impacts on future local air quality Project improvements and an aggressive TOM Ordinance and TOM Implementation Program documented in this EIR will reduce future emission to levels that will not have a significant impact on long term regional air quality Land use transDOrtation and enern conservation control mesII ures of furore develonments shall be used to the extent DOssible to mitilate Dellative air aualitv imnacts The EIR bas identified a rangeof mitigation measures that will be required for all new and modified projects within the project area A Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be prepared to specify bow these measures will be implemented and monitored In addition future developments requiring subsequent environmental documentation will be required to incorporate additional mitigation measures for any impacts found to be significant Therefore the EIR bas demonstrated that negative project impacts will be mitigated to the extent possible Air aualitv imoacts must be AnAlyzed nn both a local and rellional basis The EIR has assessed air quality impacts on both a local and regional basis and therefore the third AQMP conformity requirement 3 4 4 MITIGATION URIRR4i e 3 H Mitintioo Ml lLaJIll J tOngoing during project operation the property owner developershall implement measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical schedule goods movements for off peak traffic bours and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment as practicable 3 432 01616 Air Quality CRAlCRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e 3 1 2 Mitilation Measure Prior to the issuance of each building permit the property owner developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings in compliance with SCAQMD regulations This information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications Tho 1 p My l p sh s t1 A 1 n T e u f S r o lr C1V c o sO us 0 USe IVOf oschJe f o l c Ir O b w r l rj b u s h e o eo T w rlIy cC U I 5 Mitilation Measure A 1 l A Ongoing during construction the property owner developer shall 1 implement measures to reduce construction related air quality impacts These measures shall include but are not limited to a Normal wetting procedures at least twice daily or other dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable b Enclosing covering watering twice daily or applying approved soil binders according to manufacturer s specification to exposed stock piles c Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust and haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported from the project site occur d Wherepracticable heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site e Trucks importing or exporting soil material and or dehris shall be covered prior to entering public streets f Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto public streets including treating onsite roads and staging areas l 1 e g Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes h Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed i Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to IS miles per hour or less Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds as instantaneous gust exceed 2S miles per hour and during first and second stage slllOg alerts k Comply with the SCAQMD Rule 402 which states that DO dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance and SCAQMD Rule 403 which restricts visible emissions from construction j CIlAICRA3 3 433 Air Quality 01617 ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EJR I Use low emission mobile construction equipment e g tractors scrapers dozers etc where practicable m Utilize existing power sources e g power poles or clean fuel generators rather than temporary power generators where practicable n Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned o Use low sulfur fuel for equipment to the extent practicable Miti2ation Measure Prior to approval of each grading plan for Import Export Plan and prior to issuance of demolition permit for Demolition Plan the property owner developer shall submit Demolition and Import Export Plans The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material These options may include recycling ofmaterials onsite sale to a soil broker or contractor sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill with attempts made to move it within Orange County The property owner developer shall offer recyclable building materials such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused on project site ua at nn U c ou 1 1 c OAgeiRg 4wriAl OOAI O tlt pmp QUlft IrIPUP 1 PiPT hall the s tQ HaUl elBi si9111 Will IIshitoeftlFal geatiAgI nil cphl1t lI i are a lT ent blS rtd u6 011 bw Id 1I5 l ayp opriatG b Y I t91 Rt h U iUKwl ell dlt y are nece5 WUY In WiJ1 d ClllI uiftla8 Q1uIlOnt emirriens J nnn 08 HB8 fh avlid VI dl based coatift s 3 4 5 Miti2ation MlI 8Su 3 4 3 Prior to the issuance of each building permit the property owner developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology BACT and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology BARCT for any new or modified stationary source Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning Department 3 4 p Miti2ation MlI 8Su 3 1 Prior to the issuance of each building permit the property owner developer shall implement and demonstrate to the City measures that are being taken to reduce operation related air quality impacts These measures may include but are not limited to the following e 01618 CRAlCRAJ4 3 434 Air ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 1 Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors 2 Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances 3 Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in building design such as appropriate passive solar design 4 Use drought resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used in pumping and transporting water 5 Participate in marketing the existing Anaheim Telecenter telecommuting video conferencing center to guests in their hotelslbusinesses 6 To the extent feasible provide daycare opportunities for employees or participate in ajoint development daycare center ItitifBtislI J 38 Fh o H ud ydoPCl iII implement a eemprehensi e 8 Rd 3WVTi f TFaIl6IUlFtati81l D ucubiMCUJa5 IUul Hlhl fer all 9R1ploy et t II DH A un 3 4 3 Th Vl PCIl vC lvpoihall co upl with all SC QMD effset n i pl n d13t1tioA gf Bet ailalde Cawsl Teehaelegy BACT lAd Bat A iH2ble V it COAt Il Rcr for an Re ef lRedified tatiSRar Curtt C8pias gf Ft it EbaU gi Ba le the PlanRiRg Qep hh Knt 3 4 4 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS G Construction emissions will result in significant unavoidable ROJt NOx CO and PMIO impacts on a temporary basis Utility usage stationary sources onsite service engines and mobile source emissions attributable to the project will result in significant increases in emissions of ROO NOx carbon monoxide and PMIO emiSSioDS in 2000 both on a project specific and cumulative basis CRAlCIlA 3 4 3 435 Air Qualiry 01619 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e 3 5 NOISE The analysis of noise conditions and impacts consists of a survey of the existing noise levels within the project boundaries prediction of future noise conditions and comparison of expected noise with relevant standards and criteria to determine impacts Field noise measurements used for the analysis are included in the EIR as Appendix D Where applicable the information contained in this section ofthe report reflects information based on the final analysis presented in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical report s referenced above has been updated verified and or validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR Analyses of the cumulative effects of the proposed project and other reasonably foreseeable development on noise is provided in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts 3 5 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS Noisesources currently contributing to the environment ofthe proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan study area include motor vehicle traffic occasional aircraft overflights pedestrians fireworks from the existing Disneyland theme park and natural sources such as wind The major sources of noise within the study area come from vehicular traffic along 1 5 Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard Ball Road West Street Disneyland Drive Walnut Street and Cerritos Avenue Existing and future Average Daily Traffic ADT volumes used in the noise modeling along major arterials wereprovided by the City of Anabeim Public WorkslEngineering Department Transportation Planning Division ADTs along freeways were provided by the California Department of Transportation Caltrans District 12 3 5 1 Noise Salles Standards and Guideline Noise can be measured and analyzed OD many scales and frequencies Various standards and guidelines are used to reau1ate noise depending onthe type endurance and location ofthe noise The scales standards and guidelines whicb apply to the analysis and reaulation of noise related to this project are discussed below Noise Salles Community noise levels are measured in terms of the A weighted decibel abbreviated dBA A weighting is a frequency correction that correlates overall sound pressure levels with the frequency response of the human ear The equivalent noise level Leq is a single number representation of the e 3 5 1 Noise CRAlCRA 3 S ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR fluctuating sound level in decibels dB over a specified period of time It is an average of the fluctuating noise level The eq of Leq stands for equivalent The Leq of a timevarying sound is equivalent or equal to a constant unchanging sound of that decibel level Leqb represents the hourly sound energy average level The Community Noise Equivalent Level CNEL is the noise and land use compatibility criteria most widely used in the State of California This measurement represents an average of all measured noise levels obtained over 24 hours based on the dBA Time weighted refers to the fact that noise that occurs during certain sensitive time periods is adjusted for occurring at these times That is 5 decibels 5 dBA are added to sound levels occurring in the evening 7 00 p m to 10 00 p m and 10 decibels 10 dBA are added to sound levels occurring during the late evening and early morning hours between 10 00 p m and 7 00 a m The City of Anaheim has adopted the CNEL as their noise metric State and local governments have established noise standards and guidelines to protect people from potential hearing damage and various other adverse physiological and social effects associated with noise The applicable standards and guidelines for this project are discussed below State of California Standards and Guidelines The State ofCalifornia has adopted noise standards in areas ofregulation not preempted by the federal government State standards regulate noise levels of motor vehicles and motor boats establish noise impact boundaries around airports regulate freeway noise affecting classrooms identify sound transmission control standards for new noisesensitive developments regulate noise control and identify noise insulation standards for new construction Sound Transmission Control The California Sound TransmissionControl Standards are found in California Code of Regulation Title 24 Building Standards Chapter 2 35 as adopted March I 1986 The purpose of the standards is to establish minimum ooise insulation performance standards to protect persons within new hotels motels apartment houses and dwellinas other than detached singlefamily dwellings The standards state that interior noise levels with windows closed attributable to exterior sources shall not exceed an annual noise level of 45 dB CNEL LeIn in any habitable room In addition residential buildings or strUctures within 60 dB CNEL LeIn from airport vehiCIIlar or industrial noise sources shall require an acoustical analysis showing that the proposed building has been designed to limit intrUding noise to the allowable 45 dB CNEL LeIn interior noise level Land Use Conmatibilitv Guidelines The State Office of Noise Control in Guidelines for the Preparation and Content ofNoise Elements ofthe General Plan established in February 1976 provided guidance for the acceptability of projectS within specific CNEL contours Residential uses are normally unacceptable in areas exceeding 70 dB CNEL and conditionally acceptable within 60 to 70 dB CNEL ClAICRA3 S 3 5 2 Noise e i e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Transient lodging such as hotels and motels are conditionally acceptable up to 70 dB CNEL and normally unacceptable in areas exceeding 70 dB CNEL Playgroundsl neighborhood parks are normally unacceptable in areas exceeding 67 dB CNEL Business commercial and professional office buildings are normally acceptable in areas up to 70 dB CNEL and conditionally acceptable in areas between 70 and 77 dB CNEL However the state stresses that these guidelines can be modified to reflect an individual community s sensitivities to noise City of Anaheim Standards and Guidelines California Government Code Chapter 775 Section 65302 f requires the noise element of a community s general plan to show in quantitative terms the contours of present and projected noise levels associated with all existing and proposed major transportation elements including highways and freeways Noise contours for roadways within the City are provided in the Noise Element of the General Plan The City has incorporated noise ordinance standards into the Noise Element of the General Plan They are listed in Table 3 5 1 City of Anabeim Exterior Noise Limits for various land uses The Noise Ordinance Standards within the Noise Element state that no person shall operate or cause to be operated any source of sound at any location within the City or allow the creation of any noise on property owned leased occupied or otherwise controlled by such person which causes the noise level when measured on any other property either incorporated or unincorporated to exceed the noise standard for that land use as specified in Table 3 5 1 for a cumulative period ofmore than 30 minutes in any hour Exhibit 3 5 1 shows the City of Anabeim s Land Use Compatibility Criteria for Community Noise Element chart The noise levels indicated are for land use decisions related to new developments of the types of uses listed only They are used in this EIR however as guidelines for analysis of compatibility of the proposed project with existing land uses Community Ambient Noise Devadation In addition to the State and City criteria set forth in standards and guidelines another consideration in defining impact criteria is based on the degradation ofthe existinl noise environment In long term community noise assessments it is generally not sipificant if no noise sensitive sites are located in the project vicinity or if increases in community noise level with the implementation ofthe project are expected to be 3 dBA or less at noise sensitive locations and the proposed project will not result in violations of local ordinances or standards This is a leneraIly accepted standard by acoustical professionals The 3 dBA increase in noise level is considered an appropriate dividing level because e CRAlCIlA3 S 3 5 3 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR based on assessment at human reaction to different noise level increases a 3 dBA change will be perceived by most people while changes smaller than it are generally not perceived TABLE 3 51 CITY OF ANAHEIM EXTERIOR NOISE UMITS General Plan Noise Ordinance Standards Maximum permissible sound levels by receiving land use A The noise standards for the various categories of land use identified by the Noise Control Officer as presented below shall unless otherwise specifically indicated apply to all such property within a designated rone B No person shall operate or cause to be operated any source of sound at any location within the City or allow the creation of any noise on property owned leased occupied or otherwise controlled by such person which causes the noise level when measured on any other property either incorporated or unincorporated to exceed L The noise standard for that land use as specified below for a cumulative period of more than 30 minutes in any hour or 2 The noise standard plus 5 dB for a cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour or 3 The noise standard plus 10 dB for a cumulative period of more than 5 minutes in any hour or 4 The noise standard plus 15 dB for a cumulative period of more than 1 minute in any hour or 5 The noise standard plus 20 dB or the maximum measured ambient for any period of time Exterior Noise Limits Receivinl Land Use I Time Period I Noise Level Standard dBA One and Two Family Residential 10 p m 7 a m 45 7 a m 10 p m 55 Multiple Dwelling Residential 10 p m 7 a m 50 Public Space 7 a m 10 p m 55 Commercial 10 p m 7 a m 55 7 a m 10 p m 60 Industrial Anytime 70 Source City of Anaheim 1978 01623 CRAlCIlA J S 3 5 Noise e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e LAND USE CATEGORY RESIDEImAL LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX MOBILE HOMES RESIDEImAL MUlT1 FAMILY TRANSIENT LODGING MOTElS HOTElS SCHOOLS UBRARIES CHURCHES HOSPITALS NURSING HOMES AUDITORIUMS CONCERT HAllS AMPHITHEATRES SPORTS ARENA OUTDOOR SPECTATOR SPORTS PlAYGROUNDS NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS GOlF COURSES RIDING STABlES WATER RECREATION CEMETERIES OFFICE BUIlDINGS BUSINESS COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL MANUFACT JRING UTIUT1ES AGRlCUlTURE 80 Soun e City aI a J PWn E1emenI Midud BnadauAlolciora 00550010 6194 LEGEND NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE SI Odfted Iond 11M 1Ilo umption 1l fY bulIdInga involVed of normoI comentiotlal conetruction wtIhout Illy IPKi8 noi roqulnmontI CONDmoNALLY ACCEPTABLE New Of detMaJlment IhouId be onIyaftot onoiyIiIol1llo roductIanraqul ilmadeancl 1ncIudacl1n 1Ilo daI9l c onv IIUI 1rIIIl airIUllI ly orair 1dI ig wtII noIy NORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE Haw or dovaIclpmonI gonofalIy be d11COU 1I i new CDI d or de atQpn IIll pIOCAId roductIan be and 1ncIudacl1n dIo9 CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE NIw uclcn Illhould gerw Iy nal bI Exhibit 3 51 Land Use Compatibility Criteria for Community Noise Environments 3 r Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR or ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Noise sensitive uses include residences motels hotels public meeting rooms auditoriums schools churches libraries hospitals amphitheaters and parks If the increase in noise exposure level is greater than 3 dBA the significance of impact will depend on the ambient noise level and the presence of noisesensitive sites Noise impacts are possibly significant if increases in noise exposure levels are expected to be greater than 5 dBA with implementation of the project Noise impacts are generally significant if the proposed project will cause noise standards or ordinances to be exceeded or increases in the community noise levels by 6 to 10 dBA in built up areas or increases by 10 dBA or more in rural areas For long term steady state noise monitoring and regulation for such things as vehicular noise or airport noise CNEL is used For short term noise regulation for such things as construction noise the maximum permissible exterior noise standard is used 3 5l 2 Existin Noise Settim The following discussion summarizes existing noise conditions within the boundaries ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The analysis includes the results of noise measurement surveys which are detailed in Appendix E of the Disneyland Resort EIR The acoustical environment within the study area is currently affected by traffic noise from Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue Ball Road West StreetlDisneyland Drive Walnut Street Cerritos Avenue and 1 5 Other noise sources audible in surrounding areas include overflying aircraft the Fantasmic show in the evening hours other seasonal fireworks Splash Mountain and the Mark Twain boat horn from within the existing Disneyland theme park Sensitive noise receptors by State guidelines within the study area include the following Singlefamily residences located west of West StreetlDisneyland Drive and north of Ball Road west ofWalnut Street and north of Katella Avenue a1001 Katella Avenue west of Walnut Street west of West StreetlDisneyland Drive and south of Katella Avenue behind motels and restaUrants east ofAnaheim BoulevardlHaster Street and north of Orangewood Avenue south of the Anaheim Convention Center and Marriott Hotel and east of 1 5 Multi family condominiums south of the Anaheim Convention Center and Marriott Hotel and east of 1 5 as well as west of Walnut Street Ka1eidoscope Condominiums CRAlCRA3 S 3 56 Noise 01625 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Multi family apartments east of Harbor Boulevard and north of Orangewood Avenue east of 1 5 and south of Ball Road near Vermont Street Mobile homes east of Haster Street and north of Orangewood Avenue and east of 1 5 Hotels and motels along major arterials in the area as well as recreational vehicle RV parks Field Measurement Results To document existing noise conditions including noise generated by activities within the existing Disneyland theme park field measurement surveys were conducted during March 199L Measurements were taIcen for I hour time periods using Larson Davis Sound Level Meters Models 700 and 8 0 All measurements were taIcen at ground level and or atop the Disneyland Hotel Table 3 5 2 lists the measurement locations and corresponding noise levels The 21 field locations are shown on Exhibit 3 5 2 Anaheim Resort Noise Study Locations Traffic noise was the major factor in local ambient noise levels Noise from overflying aircraft was also present Ambient noise levels measured in or near noise sensitive residential areas were between 55 dBA and 70 dBA depending on the individual locations and their closeness to major traffic sources Ambient noise levels measured in commercial areas or at major intersections weregenerally high ranging from 66 dBA to 88 dBA Vehicular traffic and pedestrians contributed to most of the ambient noise in these areas Existing Fireworks Noise To document existing noise conditions within the Anaheim Resort current firework displays within the existing Disneyland theme park were analyzed Current Disneyland fireworks usually begin at 9 30 p m and last for 5 minutes every night during summer and on weekends and holidays from April to June The noise level for the fireworks are projected to be 106 dBA at the sources by the manufacturer There are approximately 185 explosions per show Current fireworks rise to 800 feet in height Noise measurements for current Disneyland theme park fireworks were performed on September 5 1992 and included both the regular fireworks and Fantasmic shows Noise measurements were taIcen on the ground level at two existing residential areas nearest to the fireworks shows Detailed data are available in The Disneyland Resort EIR Appendix E 01626 CIlA CRA3 S 3 5 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 52 FIELD NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS Leq Designation Time dBA Description l 1850 S West Street 16 30 to 17 30 69 Ambient noise dominated by residence 3 28 91 traffic on West Street 2 Disneyland Hotel at 17 50 to 18 50 61 Noise sources include Seaport of the Pacific 3 28 91 waterfa1I store music people occasional aircraft f1yover 3 Disneyland Hotel 19 00 to 20 00 69 Noise sources include monorail travel port 3 28 91 monorail tramcar people entranceexit 2nd floor traffic on West Street 4 1325 Walnut Street 20 20 to 21 20 65 Noise sources include traffic residences west of 3 28 91 on Walnut Street occasional Conestoga Inn Mark Twain boat horn from Disneyland 5 1116 West Locust Street 21 30 to 22 30 62 Noise sources include traffic residence at Aspen Street 3 28 91 on 1 5 Locust Street occasional Mark Twain boat horn and aircraft f1yover 6 1055 1057 Ball Road 22 40 to 23 40 68 Noise sources include traffic Best Western Stardust 3 28191 on Ball Road and occasional Motel aircraft f1yover 7 Disneyland Autopia 11 50 to 12 50 79 Noise sources include mini entranceexit 3 30 91 cars band music peopllt mover people 8 Disneyland Splash 13 00 to 14 00 n Noise sources include people Mountain waiting areas 3130191 screaming music meter 60 feet from fail 9 Disneyland facilities cast 14 05 to 15 05 62 Noise sources include traffic parkin area behind 3130191 on West Street and parking Splash Mountain lot people Splash Mountain riders screaming low volume 10 900 S Walnut Street at 15 25 to 16 25 70 Noise sources include traffic Walnut Manor Retirlt 3130191 on Ball Road and Walnut ment Village Street with paging system at Walnut Manor CRAlCRA 3 S 3 5 8 Noise 01627 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 5 2 continued e Leqb Designation Time dBA Description II Cinnamon Hollow 16 40 to 17 40 59 Noise sources include traffic entrance exit residences 3 30 91 on Citron Street and 1 5 8 on Citron Street foot soundwall car music people Occasional aircraft flyover 12 100 Katella Avenue at 17 00 to 18 00 88 Noise sources include cars Haster Street Mobil 3 28 91 buses pedestrians and gas Station station 13 1656 Harbor Blvd at 18 15 to 19 15 65 Noise sources include cars Freedman Way 3 28 91 buses pedestrians miniature golf course 14 2080 Harbor Boulevard 19 30 to 20 30 70 Noise sources include cars at Orangewood Avenue 3 28 91 buses pedestrians IS 815 Katella Avenue at 20 35 to 21 35 74 Noise sources include cars Budget Rent a Car near 3 28 91 pedestrians security guard at Heidi Hotel Budget Rent a Car 16 Comer of Palm Street 21 45 to 22 45 64 Noise sources include cars and Winston Road east 3 28 91 people yelling of 1 5 17 1844 Haster Street 12 00 to 13 00 55 Noise sources include cars between Satellite Mobile 3 30 91 residents people at Hampton Homes Park and Inn Plantation Mobile Estates Inc 18 400 Freedman Way at 13 10 to 14 10 58 Noise sources include cars Melodyland Christian 3 30191 buses Center parking lot 19 1202 Kimberly Place at 14 20 to 15 20 64 Noise sources include cars Walnut Street residence 3 30191 buses pedestrians bicyclists 20 1560 Harbor Boulevard 15 30 to 16 30 74 Noise sources include cars at Chao s Chinese 3 30 91 buses pedestrians skateboard Restaurant 21 1770 Harbor Boulevard 16 40 to 17 40 69 Noise sources include cars at Katella Avenue 3 30191 buses pedestrians Source MBA 1991 01628 3 5 9 Noise CRAlCRA3 ---PAGE BREAK--- ail 01 f1 o o J Cerritos Avenue i G 0 j 1 aJ 1lIIA11193 i 1 Legend 0rIngewa0d A J Anaheim Raon J Boundary J Nail Maaitarioc1 m Michael IlnadmoaA 005 0010 fiIH Exhibit 3 52 Anaheim Resort Noise Study Locations Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 510 01629 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Existing Traffic Noise Existing traffic noise levels were calculated for traffic along roadway segments within the study area with the Federal Highway Administration s Highway Noise Prediction Model FHWA RD 77 108 1978 Model input data included average daily traffic levels provided by Austin Foust Associates Inc March 1994 day night percentages of autos medium trucks and heavy trucks vehicle speeds ground attenuation factors and roadway widths The City of Anaheim has an exterior noise limit of 65 dB CNEL for residential uses from long term steady noise sources For commercial uses 70 dB CNEL is the exterior noise limit These exterior noise limits are already exceeded by ambient noise conditions for the applicable land uses along Ball Road Katella Avenue Orangewood Avenue Freedman Way Chapman Avenue Euclid Street West Street State College Boulevard The City Drive East Street Harbor Boulevard Haster Street Anaheim Boulevard and portions of Cerritos Avenue Walnut Street Lewis Street and Sunkist Street Table 3 5 3 Existing Roadway Noise Levels gives distances from area roadway centerlines to 70 65 and 60 dB CNEL and gives the CNEL at 50 feet from the nearest travel lane 3 5 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The potential noise impact of the proposed project can be divided into short term impacts for the construction period and long term effects Construction period impacts from noise generated by grading and construction equipment are considered short term effects Although construction activity in the Specific Plan area has been assumed to take place over a 16year period construction activity adjacent to anyone reception would be ofa much shorter duration Long term impacts are associated with future traffic related noise impacts along roadways and from noise generated by activities within the project boundaries Both are discussed in the following pages e CRAlCRA3 S 3 5 11 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 53 EXISTING ROADWAY NOISE LEVELS Distance from Roadway Centerline CNEL 50 feet to CNEL in feet from Centerline of 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL the Near Roadway FromfTo Travel Lane EastlWest Arterials Ball Road w10 Euclid St 55 164 517 69 0 Euclid SILoara St 67 205 646 69 9 Loara St Walnut St 61 185 581 695 Walnut SIWest St 75 232 732 70 5 West St I5 80 246 775 70 7 Harbor Blvd IAnaheim Blvd 79 233 731 69 9 Anaheim Blvd lOlive SI 81 246 774 70 4 Olive St lEast St 80 246 775 70 7 East St State College Blvd 77 239 753 70 6 State College Blvd lSunkist SI 82 252 796 70 8 Sunkist St SR 57 96 300 947 716 Cerritos Avenue wlo Euclid SI set 70 216 65 2 Euclid St 19th SI 50 57 173 64 2 9th St Walnut SI 50 50 173 64 2 Walnut St West St 50 50 50 62 2 Anaheim Blvd lLewis SI 50 50 50 64 5 Lewis St State College Blvd 50 50 50 64 0 State College Blvd lSunkist St 50 SO SO 615 Sunkist St SR 57 50 SO 50 60 5 Convention Way eto West SI 50 50 SO 57 5 wlo Harbor Blvd 50 50 50 57 5 Gene Autry Way Lewis StState College Blvd SO SO 109 62 9 01631 CIlAICRA3 S 3 5 12 Noise e I ---PAGE BREAK--- Anoheim Resort Specific Plan E R e TARE 3 53 continued Distance from Roadway Centerline CNEL 50 feet to CNEL in feet from Centerline of 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL the Near Roadway FromITo Travel Lane Katella Avenue w o Euclid St 67 205 646 62 9 Euclid St 9th St 63 191 603 69 6 9th St Walnut St 61 185 581 695 Walnut St West St 97 293 922 70 9 West St Harbor Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 719 Harbor St [PHONE REDACTED] 717 Clementine St Haster St [PHONE REDACTED] 718 Haster St Manchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 72 1 Anaheim Blvd lLewis St 100 302 950 71 1 Lewis St State College Blvd 91 275 864 70 7 State College Blvd Howell Ave 86 257 806 70 4 Howell AveJSR 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 719 SR 57 Douglass Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 713 Orangewood Avenue Euclid St9th St 50 63 194 65 0 9th St West St 50 63 194 65 0 West StHarbor Blvd 50 90 280 66 3 Harbor Blvd Haster St 50 97 302 66 6 Haster St lLewis St 50 57 173 64 2 Anaheim College Blvd 50 70 216 65 2 State College Blvd lSR 57 50 110 345 67 2 Freedman Way Harbor St SO 56 173 64 5 Clementine StHaster St SO 57 173 64 2 Howell Avenue State Collece Blvd lSunkist St SO SO 78 615 Sunkist St Katella Ave SO 50 109 62 9 Chapman Avenue 9th St West St SO 144 452 68 4 West St Harbor Blvd 59 178 560 69 3 Harbor Blvd Haster St 63 191 603 69 6 Haster St lLewis St 57 171 538 69 1 Lewis StCity Dr 65 198 624 69 8 1 5ISR 57 67 205 646 69 9 e 3 5 13 Noise CIlAICRA3 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABE 3 5 3 continued Distance from Roadway Centerline CNEL 50 feet to CNEL in feet from Centerline of 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL the Near Roadway Fromffo Travel Lane North South Arterials Euclid Street Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 57 171 538 69 1 Orangewood Ave lKatella Ave 59 178 560 69 3 Katella Ave lCerritos Ave 61 185 581 695 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 63 191 603 69 6 Ball Rd lCrone Ave 59 178 560 69 3 9th Street Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 50 50 94 62 2 Orangewood Ave lKatella Ave 50 50 125 63 5 Katella A ve lCerritos Ave 50 50 63 60 5 Walnut Street Katella A ve lCerritos Ave 50 50 140 64 0 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 50 59 187 65 3 Ball Rd lCrone Ave 50 50 125 63 5 West Street s o Chapman Ave 50 97 302 66 6 Chapman Ave Orangewood Ave 50 97 302 66 6 Orangewood Ave Convention Way 50 90 280 66 3 Convention WaylKatella Ave 50 117 366 67 5 Katella A ve lCerritos Ave 50 104 323 66 9 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 50 92 281 66 0 Harbor Boulevard s o Chapman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 713 Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 97 293 922 70 9 Orangewood Ave lConvention Way [PHONE REDACTED] 719 Convention WaylKarella Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 72 5 Katella Ave Freedman Way [PHONE REDACTED] 72 3 Freedman Way Manchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 72 9 Manchester Ave I5 [PHONE REDACTED] 72 9 1 5 Ball Rd 94 293 925 71 5 Ball Rd Nermont Ave 61 185 581 69 5 010 Vermont Ave 50 158 495 68 8 01633 CRAlCIlA3 S 35 14 Noise e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e TABE 3 5 3 continued Distance from Roadway Centerline CNEL 50 feet to CNEL in feet from 70 CNEL Centerline of 65 CNEL 60 CNEL the Near Roadway Fromffo Travel Lane Haster Street s o Chapman Ave 59 178 560 69 3 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 131 409 68 0 Orangewood Ave Katella Ave 57 171 538 69 1 Katella AveJManchester Ave 50 158 495 68 8 Manchester Ave I5 61 185 581 69 5 Olive Street Ball Rd Nermont Ave 50 50 50 59 2 Manchester Avenue Clementine St Harbor Blvd 50 50 50 59 2 Ball Rd I5 50 50 78 61 5 Anaheim Boulevard 1 5 Cerritos Ave 71 206 645 69 4 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 71 219 689 70 2 Ball Rd Nermont Ave 59 178 560 69 3 Lewis Street s oChapman Ave 50 84 264 66 8 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave 50 50 63 60 5 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 109 62 9 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 50 50 78 615 State College Boulevard 1 5 Orangewood Ave 89 266 835 70 5 Orangewood AveJGene Autry Way 70 203 634 69 3 Gene Autry WayKate1la Ave 70 203 634 69 3 Katella Ave Howell Ave 68 194 605 69 1 Howell A ve lCerritoS Ave 68 194 605 69 1 CerritoS Ave 1Bal1 Rd 68 194 605 69 1 n10 Ball Rd 81 239 749 70 0 The City Drive s o Chapman Ave 59 178 560 69 3 East Street Ball Rd Nermont Ave 50 59 187 65 3 e 3 5 15 Noise CRAlCIlA 3 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR TABE 353 continued Distance from Roadway Centerline CNEL 50 feet to CNEL in feet from Centerline of 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL the Near Roadway FromfTo Travel Lane Sunkist Street Howell Ave lCerritos Ave 50 50 50 59 2 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 50 50 156 645 Ball Rd Nermont Ave 50 74 233 66 2 Interstate 5 Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 477 1024 2205 818 Orangewood Ave lKatella Ave 477 1024 2205 818 Katella Ave Ball Rd 475 1020 2196 817 010 Ball Rd 520 1119 2409 82 3 State Route 57 Chapman Ave Katella Ave 508 1091 2349 82 2 Katella Ave Ball Rd 519 1117 2405 82 3 Does not consider any natural or manmade shielding effects between sources and receptors Traffic noise levels within 50 feet of the roadway centerline require more detailed site specific studies Source Michael Brandman Associates 1994 3 5 2 1 Short Term Construction Imoads Though the Specific Plan itself would not result in any noise impact future individual sitespecific development in the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area will result in constrUction noise impacts ConstrUction noise will affect ambient noise levels on and around any constrUction site within the study area for individual site development as they occur Noise generated by constrUction equipment including earth movers material handlers and portable generators can reach high levels in excess of 6S dBA The EPA bas found that the noisiest equipment types operating at constrUction sites typically range from 88 dBA to 91 dBA at a distance ofSO feet Typical operating cycles may involve 2 minutes of full power followed by 3 or 4 minutes at lower settings Although noise ranges were found to be similar for all constrUction phases the erection phase tends to be less noisy In general noise levels vary from 79 dBA to 88 dBA at SO feet during the erection phase of constrUction 01635 CRAICRAJ 5 3 5 16 Noise e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Pkm EIR e Since noise from localized sources such as construction activities typically diminishes by about 6 dBA with each doubling of distance from source to receptor outdoor receptors within 100 feet of construction sites that have an uninterrupted view of the construction site will experience noise greater than 85 dBA when noise on the adjacent part ofthe construction site exceeds 91 dBA Construction activities will cause annoyance to noise sensitive land uses in the surrounding area for periods when construction equipment is operating near the edge of the property closest to the receptors Nearby noise sensitive receptors will be affected by the construction activities in the individual project area Depending on the location of these receptors maximum outdoor noise levels at residences 100 feet from the construction site could be as high as 85 dBA Itshould be noted that construction noise is exempt from compliance with the City noise ordinance between 7 00 a m and 7 00 p m Construction noise levels between 7 00 p m and 7 00 a m are required to be in compliance with the Anaheim Municipal Code 60 dBA at the property line Construction noise would be a short term unavoidable impact 3 5 2 2 LOIII Tenn Noise ImDacts Future individual development proposals within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be incrementally addin traffiC to local roadways Traffic noise impacts from individual developments are not feasible at th s time however a general analysis of the traffic noise impacts in the project study area is discussed below Implemenwion of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project may result in an increase in noise levels on 1 5 and along most existing arterials within the study area By the year 2010 however noise levels along some existing arterials within the study area may decrease as a result of completion of the HOV lanes on 1 5 which will provide convenient access to the proposed parking facilities associated with The Disneyland Resort project and the Intermodal Transportation Center Future noise level inaeases over existing levels of roadway noise in the Specific Plan area were separated into the followinC cases Year 2000 No Project Year 2000 Fint Stage Project Year 2010 No Project and Year 2010 With Project Tables 01 through D4 located in Appendix D list distances from the area roadway centerline to 70 65 and 60 dB CNEL and list the CNEL at SO feet from the nearest travel lane The inaeases in noise in the no project traffic analyses in year 2000 and year 2010 will be due to the cumulative condition ofpopulationvisitor growth and area buildout in the project vicinity As in the analysis of the existing conditions the future traffic generated noise impact levels were calculated using the Federal Highway Administration s Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model Traffic volumes in year 2000 and 2010 wereprovided by Austin Foust Associates Inc e CRAlCRAJ 5 3 5 17 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Year 2000 With Project Trame Noise Noise level increases in year 2000 due to the cumulative condition of population visitor growth and area buildout in the project vicinity will be less than 3 dBA from their corresponding existing levels except along Gene Autry Way and Orangewood Avenue between Haster Street and SR 57 In some areas traffic noise will decrease because of redistribution ofthe traffic from the proposed provision of convenient freeway access to public parking areas and West StreetlDisneyland Drive Noise level increases in year 2000 with the implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be 0 2 dBA or less above the corresponding no project levels These noise level increases from project related traffic over year 2000 no project noise levels will not be detectible and therefore will not be considered significant The Environmental Impact ReportfEnvironmental Impact Statement for the 1 5 Widening project from SR 22 to SR 91 included an analysis of noise projected to be generated by the 1 5 Widening project The noise criteria used in the study were the same criteria used by the Federal Highway Administration and are described in terms ofthe Leq The acceptable dBA threshold was 67 Leq or below Based upon the noise criteria the noise analysis concluded that no sound abatement along 1 5 was necessary from 200 feet south of South Street through the intersection of 1 5 with Ball Road Year 2010 With Project Trame Noise Traffic noise levels in 2010 will decrease from their corresponding existing levels due to traffic redistribution and road improvements anticipated in the future along the following segments Cerritos Avenue west of Euclid Street to 9th Street Katella Avenue west of Euclid Street to 9th Street and between West Street and Harbor Boulevard Chapman Avenue between West Street and Harbor Boulevard and between Lewis Street and SR 57 Harbor Boulevard between Katella Avenue and 1 5 Anaheim Boulevard between Cerritos Avenue and Vermont Avenue Due to traffic redistribution and freeway access to public parking areas anticipated in the future traffic noise levels will increase from their corresponding year 2010 background levels along the following roadway segments 01637 CRAlCIlA 3 S 3 5 18 Noise e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Convention Way between West Street and Harbor Boulevard increase 4 0 to 4 7 dBA Gene Autry Way between Lewis Street and State College Boulevard increase of 4 1 dBA Orangewood Avenue from west ofHarbor Boulevard to SR 57 increase of 3 0 dBA to 63 dBA Freedman Way between Clementine Street and Haster Street increase of 3 4 dBA West Street between Cerritos Avenue and Ball Road increase of 3 5 dBA 1 5 between Orangewood Avenue and Katella Avenue increase of 3 0 dBA Manchester Avenue between Ball Road and 1 5 increase of 3 8 dBA Lewis Street between Gene Autry Way and Katella Avenue increase of 3 5 dBA State College Boulevard between Gene Autry Way and Katella Avenue increase of 3 0 dBA Contributions from project related noise will be less than 1 0dBA over their corresponding no project levels for those roadway segments that will bave an increase of 3 dBA or higher as identified above Consequently these noise level cbanges attributable to traffic from implementation ofthe project will not be considered significant These noise level increases are not identified as significant cumulative impacts because there are no outdoor uses along these roadway segmentS and indoor noise sensitive uses are sbielded by building structures Consequently these noise level changes attributable to traffic from theproposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan development above 2010 baseline noise levels will not be considered significant Year 2000lYear 2010 PuIdn Structure Noise In addition to long term noise impacts associated with future traffic related noise there is the potential for significant adverse noise impacts generated by tire squealing car borns car alarms and engine noise from sweeping equipment and other parmg structure lIl tivity related noise from hotel parmg structures located adjacent to noise sensitive residential uses e CRAlCRA 3 5 3 5 19 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 5 3 MITIGATION MEASURES Mitilation M ure 3 5 1 During demolition grading and construction noise generated by construction activity shall be limited by the property owner developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries before 7 00 a m and after 7 00 p m as governed by Chapter 6 7 Sound Pressure Level ofthe Anaheim Municipal Code Mitintion M ure 3 5 2 Priorto issuance of the firstbuilding permit An 8 foot high perimeter or portable construction barrier shall be provided by the property owner developeralong boundaries of construction areas which have noise sensitive land use adjacent to them to minimize noise impacts Mitilation Measure 3 53 During construction the property owner developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers Mitintion Measure 35 4 Priorto the submittal ofeach final site plan the property owner developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Qiet Building 8ffi i ide fying whether noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements if warranted to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance Ultimate noise attenuation requirements if any shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property owner developerprior to final building and zoning inspections Mitintion M 3 55 Priorto issuance ofeach building permit for structures that are adjacent to noisesensitive areas such as residences the property owner developer shall ensure that all mechanical ventillltion units are shown on plans and installed in compliance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance U H Jf 3 j t U ur buDding lu dt ilUy huM p L flCilities Wj Al Ilt t NlidlR i1l CIS hall tJluhm t te e Pl Buad 5 D i3 dO Anting dill the driviBISy e lI all h UIlsod wf w Lh nteal Beis Mitintion u 3s1 Engine noise from sweepin equipment used in any 1IeteI parking facil ities located adj al areas shall be muffted subject to the review and approval ofthe Planning Department itiiBI Division CIlAICRA 3 5 3 5 20 Noise 01639 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- ATUJheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e 7 Mitilation Measure 3 5 8 Priorto issuance of each building permit the property owner developer shall ensure that noise from parking structures adjacent to residential areas will be reduced by the provision ofconvenient access to parking facilities sound attenuation devices louvers and walls the use of textured deck surfaces to reduce tire squealing and tiering a parking facility to provide greater distance to the receptor 3 5 4 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS Exceedance ofthe City sNoise Ordinance is not anticipated from construction of future development projects However shoet term unavoidable adverse impacts around individual construction site would occur Noise from vehicular traffic will incrementally increase roadway noise this impact will not be perceptible in most locations and is not a significant project related impact e CRACRA 3 3 5 21 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ElR 3 6 EAR11I RESOURCES GEOWGY SOILS AND SEISMICITY e Dames Moore conducted aPreliminary Geotechnical Investigation report for the Ahaheim Resort This section incorporates the findings of the Dames Moore report The geotechnical investigation included a review of previous geotechnical investigations and available published reports The previous geotechnical investigations include subsurface exploration during which exploratory backhoe pits and borings were accomplished Based on this information Dames Moore developed geotechnical data and information for use in planning design and site development The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation report is available for review with the City of Anaheim 3 6 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS 3 6 1 1 Rl llional Phvsi02raohv Topotraohv and Geo1ot Y The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project area is situated within the Peoinsular Rang Physiographic Province which extends from Los Angeles County to southern Baja California Mexico The mllior landforms of Los Angeles were created largely by deformational earth movements that have taken place within approximately the last 2 5 to 4 million years Regional compression generated by historic faulting has caused surface and subsurface deformation throughout the province e One of the landforms in the province is a broad floodplain IaIown as the Coastal Plain of Orange County which stretches northwesterly from the vicinity of Irvine to the north Orange County boundary with Los Angeles County and is divided into two sections the Downey Plain and the Tustin Plain The project area is located in the northeastern section of the Downey Plain Formed from deposition by streams ancestral to the modem day San Gabriel and Santa Ana rivers the Downey Plain maintains a uniform grade with an average slope of less than 20 feet per mile The U S Geologic Survey USGS divides the strata that fill the coastal plain into three general groups I alluvial deposits that form the surface of the Downey Plain 2 ullCOnsolidated deposits that underlie the alluvial deposits and 3 consolidated rock of primarily marine sediments USGS 1943 The Holocene and Pleistocene alluvial and marine deposits beneath the project site achieve a thickness of up to 4 000 feet The Holocene alluvial sediments are thickest in the Anaheim area and are commonly characterized by gravelly coarse sands California DepartmeDt of Conservation Division of Mines and GeololY 1980 Approximate1y 4 000 feet of UIICOnsolidated sediments underlie the City of Anaheim The sedimentary deposits alluvium unconsolidated and consolidated achieve a total depth of 20 000 feet deep near the project site 3 61 Earth sources Otology Soils and Seismicity e 1IIIOO55 atA U ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan E1R 3 6 1 2 According to the D S Soil Conservation Service 1978 soils underlying the project area include the San Emigdio Metz and Hueneme series The California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology CDMG has combined these units into two general soil units unconsolidated sands and unconsolidated silts of recent age The San Emigdio series consists of fine sandy loams characterized by moderately slow permeability slow runoff and a slight erosion potential The Metz series consists of loamy sands characterized by moderate permeability slow runoff and a slight erosionpotential The Hueneme series consists offine sandy loams characterized by moderately rapid permeability slow runoff and a slight erosion potential Previous exploration of local geotechnical conditions within the project area have indicated that the area is generally underlain by a thin surficial layer 2 to 5 feet thick of silty fine sand Other surficial materials that may occur in the area include artificial fills in areas that have been previously developed and deeper loose soils where backfill was placed following the removal oforchard stumps Below the surficial soils are natural soils consisting generally of alternating layers of sands silty sands and silts The sands may contain occasional gravel and cobbles and the silt soils generally contain occasional layers of moderately soft silts These thin layers of silt within the sand deposits may become somewhat weaker when wet LeRoy Crandall I965c 3 6 1 3 Seismicitv Earthquakes are common to Southern California The faulting and deformation operating in Southern California and affecting the project site are governed by regional north south compression a product of the continued motion between the Pacific and North American plates Yerkes 1985 There are three types of fault movements in the Southern California area strike slip reverse slip and reverse obliqueslip Strike slip faults exhibit horizontal displacement in which rocks slide past one another Reverse faults exhibit vertical movement in which the rock above the fault plane moves upward relative to the rock below Faults that experience components of reverse slip and strike slip are oblique faults Exhibit 3 61 shows typical fault motions Geological evidence is used to determine the likelihood of future rupture along a fault Faults are described as active potentially active or inactive based on their potential for activity Those faults that give evidence of surface displacement within Holocene time the last 11 000 years bave the highest potential of generating earthquakes again and are described as active Distinct landforms lBIOOSS cRA U 3 62 01642 nh Resources Geology Soils and ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit 3 61 Typical Fault Motions AnaheIm Resort Specific Plan EI Strike Slip Fault Reverse Fault Normal Fault 1111 Midlod A 00550010 3I J4 3 63 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e suggesting fault movement within the last 11 000 years include sag ponds offset drainages linear valleys and springs Faults that are poorly defined or inadequately studied but that have shown activity within the last 16 million years are considered potentially active As such their recurrence rates may be tens of thousands of years long but still capable ofproducing moderate to large earthquakes within the design life of many critical or long lifetime structures Various methods are used to determine the impact an earthquake can have on the areas surrounding a fault These methods can be used as planning and engineering tools They include the Modified Mercalli Intensity MI scale Richter the slip rate recurrence intervals and the maximum probable and maximum credible magnitudes MI is a commony used method for describing the intensity of ground motion and is used to emphasize the current seismic environment at a site Intensity scales measure groundshaking severity according to historical damage done to structures changes in the earth surface and personal accounts Because the MI scale uses subjective measures to describe the intensity of an earthquake there may be a number of values of intensity on the scale since the observable effects may vary from location to location Table 3 6 1 defines the MI scale numbers and compares the scale to the Richter magnitude scale The Richter magnitude scale measures the amount of energy released during an earthquake The slip rate is the average rate of displacement of a point along a fault as measured by built or geological features whose age can be estimated A recurrence interval is the average time span between large events A maximum credible earthquake is the maximum earthquake that appears capable of occurring underthe presently Ia10wn seismie conditions The maximum probable earthquake is the maximum earthquake that is likely to occur during a lOOyear interval Neither a maximum probable earthquake oor a maximum credible earthquake occurrence can be assured however their likelihood of occurring is great enough to be relevant COMG 1980 H istorie earthquakes that have caused substantial groundshaking in the project area include the 1933 Long Beach earthquake magnitude 6 3 along the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone NlFZ the 1987 Whittier Narrow earthquake magnitude 5 9 on the Elysian Park Thrust Fault the 1992 Yucca Valley magnitude 7 4 and the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake magnitude 7 9 on the San Andreas Fault In addition a large earthquake in 1812 occurred on either the southern portion ofthe Newport Inglewood e JIIIOOS 3 6 3 6 4 Earth Resources ology Soils and Seismicity ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Fault Zone or on the San Andreas Fault near San Bernardino This 1812 event caused ground motion in the project area TABLE 3 61 RELATlONSIDP BE1WEEN MODIFIED MERCALLIINTENSITY SCALE AND RICHTER MAGNlTIJDE Richter Modified Mercalli Magnitude Intensity Scale Description M3 I Detected only by sensitive instruments II Felt by a few people at rest III Felt noticeably indoors but not always recognized as a quake vibration like a passing truck M4 IV Felt indoors by many and outdoors by few V Felt by most people some breakage of windows dishes and plaster MS VI Felt by all falling plaster and chimneys damage small VII Damage to buildings varies depending on quality of construction negligible damage in buildings of good design M6 VIII Walls monuments chimneys fall panel walls thrown on frames slight damage in specialy designed structures IX Buildings shift off foundations foundations crack ground cracks underground pipes break M7 X Most masonry and frame structures destroyed ground crack landslides M8 XI Ground fissures pipes break landslides rails bent new structures remain standing XII Damage total waves seen on ground surface objects thrown into the air Source Leighton t Associates 1991 from California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology 1979 Earthquakes from several active and potentially active faults in the region could affect future developments within the project area see Exhibit 3 62 Major Regional Faults The active and potentially active faults which are capable of generating the strongest ground motion at the site include the Newpon Inglewood Whittier and Elsinore faults Other faults that may be capable of generating IBIOO5S CRA U 3 65 nh Rtsourcts Geology Soils and Seismicity e e 10 o ---PAGE BREAK--- lItmJ LJ AnobamR r is Spdic An alian h1iwe CS1 p aSp a CSJ IUonWy h1iwe e e 10 OJ 114 ftq O 60 atI W l t 4 Cl Orqo lIiIIiIliiljo OIIngoC YEm III OIvtoionlNe ZiIcfty Jona IhI mMichod Exhibit 3 62 Major Regional Faults Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area EIR O J5500JO IiIH 3 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR strong ground motion at the site include faults located offshore e g Palos Verdes Fault Zone more distant onshore faults e g San Jacinto and San Andreas faults and local faults e g Norwalk and Peralta Hills faults The following discussion describes each fault in the region that could affect the site its known activity and the probable attributes of an earthquake associated with the fault Newoorl Im lewood Fault Zone INIFZl Active The NIFZ is a series of subparallel faults that begins off the coast and extends from Dana Point inland through Newport Beach Long Beach and Torrance until it either merges with or is truncated by the Santa Monica Fault The total length of the fault zone is greater than 50 miles 80 km Recent seismic activity is indicated by numerous historic earthquakes including the 1933 Long Beach earthquake The estimated Quaternary 11 000 to 1 6 million years before present slip rate for the northern segment ofthe fault zone is 0 1 to 12 mm1yr The nearest point of the NIFZ is located approximately 8 miles 12 km southwest of the site The California Division of Mines and Geology 1974 suspects that the NIFZ is capable of generating II maximum probable magnitude of 6 5 and a maximum credible earthquake of 7 5 Intensities could reach vn to vm at the project site because of such an earthquake Whittier Fault Active The Whittier Faultparallels the NIFZ northeast ofOrange County and has atotaIlength of 25 miles 40 km At its nearest point it is 8 miles 12 km northeast of the project site Although no major bistoric earthquakes have been correlated to the fault some earthquakes were centered in the vicinity of this fault on fault splays which may be pan of the Whittier Fault The estimated Quaternary slip rate for this fault is 1 6 to 2 9 mm1yr Recent activity suggests that it has the ability to generate a 6 3 magnitude maximum probable earthquake and a 7 0 magnitude maximum credible earthquake Elsinore Fault Active The Elsinore Fault is approximately 130 miles 210 km long and extends from its intersection with the Whittier and Chino faults on the DOrth to its terminus near the U S Mexico Border The northern end llf the Elsinore Fault is approximate1y 21 miles 33 km east of the project site The late Quaternary 2 5 million years before the present slip rate of the fault is estimated to range from 3 3 to 9 3 mm1yr with a best estimate of 4 to 7 mm1yr The most notable historic earthquake on this fault is the 1910 TemescaJ Valley earthquake magnitude 6 0 along the northernmost segment of the fault In addition two earthquakes of magnitude greater than 6 5 may have occurred on related faults in Mexico in 1892 and 1934 Available data suggest an average recurrence interval of large earthquakes magnitude greater than 7 0 of approximate1y 200 years on the northernmost segment of the fault The maximum probable earthquake magnitude is 6 3 and the maximum credible earthquake magnitude is 7 0 llllOO5 cIlA J 6 3 67 nh Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity 01647 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Palos Verdes Hills Fault Zone Active Another fault exhibiting recent movement is the Palos Verdes Hills Fault Zone which lies 19 miles southwest of the project site It is known to be the source of numerous small earthquakes The fault runs under the Palos Verdes Peninsula through the subsurface of the Palos Verdes Hills USGS 1985 Approximately 80 miles long it is unclear whether the fault experiences reverse or reverse right oblique movement The Palos Verdes Hills Fault could generate a maximum probable earthquake magnitude of 6 2 Dames Moore 1992 and a 6 5to 7 0 magnitude maximum credible event with a recurrence interval of 2 000 to 8 000 years Dames Moore 1983 San Andreas Fault Zone Active The San Andreas Fault marks the boundary between the North American Plate and the Pacific Plate as such it bas been recognized as the major seismotectonic feature in California The last major earthquake in Southern California originating from the San Andreas fault was the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake magnitude 8 0 This earthquake resulted in surface displacement of 16 to 36 feet 5 to II m along the fault and generated intensities ofX to XI Modified Mercalli scale Intensities ofX to XI indicate the destruction of some structures The COMG 1982 has determined that the San Andreas Fault is capable of generating a maximum probable magnitude event of 8 3 It is suspected that the segment of the San Andreas Fault Zone closest to the site is accumulating large amounts of energy which could be released during infrequent large magnitude magnitude 7 to 8 events rather than by more frequent smaller magnitude earthquakes The most recent great earthquake magnitude 8 or greater on this segment may have occurred over 150 years ago Sieh et aI 1989 The long term slip rate for this portion of the fault zone is approximately 25 nun yr at Cajon Pass near San Bernardino Although the project site lies approximately 41 miles to the southwest of the San Andreas Fault it may experience intensities of vn to VIII during a magnitude 8 3 earthquake Table 3 61 14 San Jacinto Faull Zone Active The San Jacinto Fault Zone comprises up to 20 distinct but related northwest trending right lateral strikeslip faull segments This fault zone has been the most historically active fault zone within Southern CaIifornia having generated between 6 and 10 earthquakes measuring magnitudes of 6 0 or greater on the Richter scale since 1989 The fault extends from its junction with the San Andreas Fault in Cajon Pass to near the U S Mexico border and is approximately 165 miles 265 km long Individual faults within the fault zone are known to displace Pleistocene and Holocene age strata along its entire length The San Jacinto Faull Zone is located approximately 39 miles 63 km northeast of the project site It has had an estimated slip rate of 8 to 12 nun yr for the last 700 000 years and 9 to 13 nun yr during the late Pleistocene and Holocene The maximum probable earthquake magnitude is 7 0 and the maximum credible earthquake magnitude is 7 5 e 01648 1 5 CRA 3i 3 68 rth Resources Geology Soils and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan E R Peralta Hills Fault potentially Active The Peralta Hills Fault is a thrust fault that is most likely responsible for the uplift of the Peralta Hills The Peralta Hills Fault is located approximately 4 5 miles 7 5 Ian east of the project site Norwalk Fault potentially Active The Norwalk Fault is a thrust fault located approximately 4 miles 6 5 Ian north of the site The Norwalk Fault is at least 8 5 miles 13 5 Ian in length and may have been the source of a damaging earthquake magnitude 4 7 in 1929 although the recent history ofactivity on this fault and its surface trace are uncertain based upon the available data it is still considered to be potentially active Elvsian Park Thrust Fault Active The Elysian Park Thrust Fault is described as a blind west striking thrust fault in that it does not emerge at the ground surface The existence of this fault wbich is located approximately 16 miles northeast of the project site was generally unrecognized prior to the occurrence of the October 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake magnitude 5 9 which had its focus at a depth of approximately 14 6 kilometers on the Elysian Park Thrust Fault It is believed that this fault may be part of a fold and thrust belt which extends along the north and west flanks of the Los Angeles Basin Because these faults do not extenq to the surface their only surface expressions are anticlines Ie largescaled upward convex folds in crustal rocles evaluation of associated seismic hazards is difficult Slip rates on the Elysian Park Thrust Fault have been estimated to range from 2 5to 5 2 millimeters per year Maximum credible earthquake magnitudes for the thrust fault in the Whittier area have been estimated to range from 2 5 to 5 2 millimeters per year Maximum credible earthquake magnitudes for the thrust fault in the Whittier area have been estimated to be between 5 and 6 Maximum credible earthquake magnitudes of up to 7 5 have been suggested for segments of the associated fold and thrust belt lying farther to the west Johnson Valley Fault Zone Active The Johnson Valley Fault is a northwest trending right lateral strikeslip fault located approximately 89 miles east of the project site The epicenters of the June 28 1992 Landers eanbquake magnitude 7 4 and a number of aftershocles were on this fault although right lateral surface faulting associated with that event appears to have occurred over a distance ofmore than 70 kilometers on the nearby Lenwood Homestead Valley and Camp Rock Emerson faults whicb approximately parallel the Johnson Valley Fault Maximum credible earthquake magnitudes on these faults were previously estimated to be in the 6 3 to 7 1 range but will be reevaluated based on the recent seismic activity Reevaluated maximum credible earthquake magnitudes may be as bigh as 7 9 3 6 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACJ S The potential geologic and seismic hazards identified for the project are not substantially different from other inland and flatland sites in Southern California Geologic and seismic hazard impacts of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project are described as follows 18IOOSS cJlA 3 3 69 Earth Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity 01649 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Implementation of specific developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area may involve removal of some existing improvements excavation and grading Although the volume of earthwork cannot be quantified at this time the mitigation measures included in Section 3 6 3 address impacts associated with grading 3 6 2 1 Settlement Surface loading and other stresses can cause soils to settle Settlement occurs when loosely consolidated materials and fills collapse into soil pore space under the weight ofstructures The soils in the project area are strong and competent at their present moisture content but would decrease in strength and undergo settlement with increases in moisture content LeRoy Crandall 1965 Although differential settlement of foundations would not exceed 0 2 inches the majority of this settlement would occur rapidly and would take place when the structures are completed Should the foundation soils become saturated additional settlement would occur rapidly Because the earth materials underlying the project area have relatively high densities it is anticipated that for future development associated with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project estimated settlements would be minimal causing no significant adverse impacts 3 6 2 2 Erosion The near surface soils are generally silty sands The project area is relatively flat therefore there is little potential for erosion As discussed in Section 3 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology the project will be required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities Compliance with this permit will include implementing erosion controls as necessary during construction Much of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is covered by impervious surfaces e g concrete asphalt or landscaped areas and will continue as such with implementation of the Specific Plan Impervious surfaces will increase the amount of water that will run off because of the elimination of infiltration see Section 3 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology but little earth material will be available for erosion Therefore the erosion potential for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be lowered in the long term and no significant long term impacts from erosion are identified e 01650 3 610 Earth Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity JIlIOOlI cJlA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 6 2 3 Seismicitv As with other developments in Southern California the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is exposed to the secondary impacts of earthquakes The environmental issues associated with earthquakes include groundshaking liquefaction ground rupture and flooding in the region The potential for these impacts to occur within the project area is discussed below Groundshaking The amount of groundshaking expected at a site is commonly expressed in terms of acceleration of gravity g or cm sec Ground acceleration is the incremental increase of the velocity of the ground where each change in rate acts as a force on a structure Acceleration at abuilding site can vary from very weak or none to forceful depending on I the distance from the fault rupture 2 the magnitude of the earthquake and 3 the local geology Because of the location of active and potentially active faults and the historical record of damaging earthquakes in the region it is likely that the project area will be subjected to strong ground motion requiring seismic engineering design Although the soils underlying the area are relatively dense they are susceptible to ground motion Peak horizontal ground accelerations of 0 1 to 0 2g VII on the Modified Mercalli scale are likely within the project area with values between 0 3 and O 4g Vlli on the Modified Mercalli scale possible during the project lifetime As discussed above movement along the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone and the San Andreas Fault Zone could result in MI values of vn to VIII at the project area The potential for earthquakes to generate similar levels of intensity exists throughout much of Southern California Therefore while there is the potential for damage from groundshaking it is not unusually severe compared to general conditions in Southern California Stability Subsidence and Liqueladion The project area maintains a gende grade of 20 feet per mile therefore ground stability is not a concern for future development whicb may occur in the Specific Plan area Groundshaking from rupture on faults may cause soils to subside under certain conditions Seismic induced settlement results when loosely consolidated low density materials and fills are seismically compacted and collapse into empty soil pore space in the absence of soil water Because the earth materials underlying the area are relatively dense the potential for subsidence within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is minimal 8IOO5S C1lA 3 6 3 611 Earrh Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity 01651 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan E R Liquefaction describes a process in which strong groundshaking that is intensities greater than VII as defined on Table 3 61 under certain conditions can cause soil to densify and allow the groundwater to rise and saturatethe soil The liquified soil may acquire ahigh degree ofmobility and become aflowing mass Two conditions must be present for liquefaction to occur low density soils and a shallow groundwater table 50 feet The earth materials underlying the project area are relatively dense and the water table is deep approximately 115 to 130 feet Therefore the potential for liquefaction within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is very low Ground Rupture The Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone APSSZ Act California Public Resources Code Section 2621 et seq provides policies and criteria to assist cities counties and state agencies in prohibiting development on active faults The APSSZ Act requires the State Geologist to delineate special study zones to encompass all potentially and recently active traces of named faults including the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults and other such faults or fault segments which are deemed sufficiently active and well defined as to constitute a potential hazard to structures from surface faulting or fault creep Maps delineating these special studies zones are provided to cities counties and state agencies Cities and counties have established special procedures for reviewing applications for new building permits within these special studies zones According to the APSSZ maps no active fault traces lie within 1 000 feet ofthe project area and the project site is not within any special studies zones Therefore ground rupture from fault movement is not expected and future development projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be in accordance with the APSSZ Act Earthquake Induced flooding Earthquake induced flooding occurs as a result offailure of reservoirs and other surface water bodies or by blockage of flowing streams The Brea Dam located approximately 5 miles north of the northernmost ponion of the project area is the closest potential source of flooding The drainage channels of the dam drain to the west away from the project area Walnut Canyon Reservoir and Prado Flood Control Basin are located 9 and 16 miles northeast ofthe site respectively Both of these drain into the Santa Ana River which is approximately 10 mile east of the eastern portion of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Other drainage channels closer to the area are engineered for flood control and do not have substantial flows except during periods of rainfall The chief engineer at the Orange County Flood Control District pers CODUD March 1992 has said that even though a rupture at Prado Dam as the result of an earthquake would cause substantial damage 11 lIllOOS5 CRA J 3 612 Eanh Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EJR he feels that the chance of an earthquake creating enough damage to break the Dam is remote In addition the water level in the dam would have to be high which creates a very remote possibility Consequently the potential for earthquake induced flooding at the project site is not considered to be significant e Tsunamis are potentially damaging sea waves generated by earthquakes submarine volcanic explosions or undersea landslides Damage caused by a tsunami is typically restricted to low lying coastal areas The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is approximately 125 to 140 feet above mean sea level and approximately 10 miles from the Pacific Ocean Therefore there is no potential for tsunami damage in the project area Seiches are earthquake induced waves in a confined body of water such as a lake reservoir or bay There are no substantial bodies of water in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Consequently there is no potential for significant seiche damage to future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area 3 63 MmGATION MEASURES Miti2ation Measure 3 61 AU gndiAg fhjil be is eeftfe UI ltl1 Titk 17 and the Aft UI MURisipal Colli Prior to approval of each grading plan the property owner developer shall submit to14W e 1 tt1 f 1 r C C t oJt a soils and geological repot1 tn anse ith Till 11 vf th AuW lil Cede ci i r C 4 bc i O tl ID d i O d o1 e 1 1 eo o s ae lc l e aAA ra4 5 IDe CO 1 r lc 17 0 f Mitilation Measure 3 62 Prior to the issuance of each building permit the property l owner developer shall submit for review and approval detailed foundation design information for the subject building s prepared by a civil engineer based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer 0 Mitilation Measure 3 63 Prior to issuance ofeach foundation permit the property owner developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer for review and approval which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing IBIOO5S cJlA 34 3 613 nh Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Mitilation Measure 3 6 4 Prior to issuance of each building permit the property owner developer shaH submit plans showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim ft 4t n 1C8 1ur 3 65 OngaiRg 8tlfiBg t speratia i03 the 111UP U uwul r shall QordiRate earhlYaka traiRieg ith the fire Def8 ftRleRt far 89t81 gtag t v l J p 1M I Mitilation Measure 3 Prior to is uanae UGIl II iftg JleFlRit for hoteljr the property owner developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review and approval The plan shall require posted notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures I Y o 0 1 s Mitilation Measure 3 6 During grading activities the property owner developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion 3 6 4 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The proposed project will expose people to potential seismic risks that are not unusually severe compared to general conditions in Southern California With implementation of the mitigation measures these impacts are not considered significant e IBlOOSS cJlA J 6 3 614 Eanh Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR 3 7 GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE HYDROLOGY 3 7 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS Appendix G Volume IV of The Disneyland Resort EIR Hydrology and Water Quality Analysis prepared by Dames Moore 1992 was used to prepare the following analysis Where applicable the information contained in this section of the report reflects information based on the final analysis presented in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical report s referenced above has been updated verified and or validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR Analyses of the cumulative effects of the proposed project and other reasonable foreseeable development on groundwater and surface hydrology is provided in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts 3 7 1 Groundwater The Orange County region is underlain by a basin ortopographic depression that during its formation over the last several million years has been in tilled with river laid sediments eroded from the surrounding mountainous areas Subsequently the sea level fluctUated numerous times eroding river deposits as it advanced and depositing marine sediments in the basin as it receded Marine and nonmarine sedimentary deposits in the project area have obtained a thickness ofover 20 000 feet and are described in Section 3 6 Earth Resources Jeology Soils and Seismicity Aquifers of the Groundwater Basin This geologic history is reflected in the layered sequence of Recent alluvium to 11 000 years before present b p D Pleistoceue deposits 11 000 to 16 million years b p and Pliocene age deposits 16 to 5 3 million years b p which comprise the 360 square mile South Coast Groundwater Basin of Orange County The rock layen in the South Coast Groundwater Basin comprise three separate aquifer systems including an Upper aquifer system Middle aquifer system and Lower aquifer system An aquifer is a generally horizontal layer of porous and permeable sediment or rock that readily transmits and holds water Water movement between the three aquifer systems in the South Coast Groundwater Basin is retarded by materials with low permeabilities which generally separate the systems CRAlCRA 3 3 7 1 GroU1ldwaler and Suiface Hydrology 01655 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR The Lower aquifer system consists of numerous interconnected aquifers of varying thickness The Lower aquifer system reaches a maximum depth ofapproximately 4 000 feet and is approximately 900 feet thick beneath the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The total thickness of the Middle aquifer system ranges from over 1 600 feet in the central portion of the South Coast Groundwater Basin to less than 50 feet in the Coyote Hills area The uppermost aquifer in the Middle aquifer system is the Main aquifer The Main aquifer may transmit water to the aquifers in the lower and middle portions of the Middle system through areas of relatively high permeability Few wells penetrate to the lower and middle portion of the Middle system The Upper aquifer system consists of several water bearing layers from Recent and Pleistocene age deposits It has an average thickness of about 800 feet and reaches a maximum thickness of greater than 1 100 feet near Anaheim The Talbert aquifer is the principal shallow aquifer in the Upper aquifer system Also present in parts of the region are numerous semiperched aquifers of limited extent that overlie the Talbert aquifer The South Coast Groundwater Basin is divided laterally into the Santa Ana Forebay and the Santa Ana Pressure area subunits The project site is situated near the southwestern boundary of the SantlAna Forebay subunit which contains the Upper Middle and Lower aquifer systems Free unconfined groundwater characterizes the Santa Ana Forebay subunit In an unconfined aquifer the water table can receive recharge from above and can move up and down freely within the aquifer in response to changes in the amount ofrecharge received Because it is unconfined the Santa Ana Forebay subunit is a major area of groundwater recharge to the South Coast Groundwater Basin Potential water bearing sediments in this subunit are over 4 000 feet thick The Santa Ana Pressure area subunit is characterized by relatively fine grained low permeability sediments which overlie the uppermost aquifer unit Groundwater in this area is possibly confined or under pressure so that the water table can neither receive recharge from above nor move up and down The finegrained sediments tend to impede infiltration of water from the surface downward to the uppermost aquifer Groundwater Resources IIIld Use Soils in the area have relatively high to moderate infi1tration rates Below the surficial soils sediments range from clayey silts and silts to sand and gravel Infiltration of surface water to groundwater beneath the project area is expected to be slowed by the presence of relatively low permeability finegrained layers within the higher permeability sands The shallowest groundwater in the project site vicinity is found in the Talbert aquifer in which the depth to groundwater varies from approximately 115 feet to 130 feet beneath the project site There is no evidence of perched or 8 CRAlCRA l 7 3 7 2 GroundwaJer and Surfate Hydrology ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EJR semi perched groundwater at or adjacent to the project site Perched water refers to a water table of limited area maintained above the normal groundwater supply by arelatively impermeable confining layer Although the Talben aquifer forms the upper ponion ofthe Upper aquifer system wells in the vicinity of the project site generally pump from the lower portion of the Upper aquifer system Generally groundwater flows toward the south and southwest but may be influenced locally by pumping wells There are 18 water wells within I mile of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Water from these wells is used for municipal and irrigation purposes and is considered to be of good to fair quality with an average of 845 milligrams per liter mg l of total dissolved solids fDS Average annual rainfall in the area is approximately 12 6 inches and the estimated infiltration rate of the soils is 20 percent Additionally it is estimated that 20 percent of irrigation water infiltrateS to the groundwater table The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area involves approximately 549 5 acres of land The majority of this area is currently developed a small ponion mostly landscaped areas is unpaved and subject to surface water inf1ltration Thus the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area does not currently contribute significantly to groundwater recharge Additionally this return flow is of low quality because as it percolateS through the ground it carries with it residual salts fertilizers pesticides and herbicides As discussed in Section 3 9 6 Water Service approximately 70 percent ofthe water supplied by the City of Anaheim is from groundwater The groundwater basin is managed by the Orange County Water District OCWD The OCWD levies and collects a water replenishment assessment fee on water extracted from the groundwater basin These monies are used for 1 the purchase of supplemental water for groundwater recharge 2 the operation and maintenance of water prnduction facilities 3 the acquisition of water rights and spreading ground facilities to replenish and protect groundwater supplies and 4 administrative purposes 3 7 U Surface WaterlRlI The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project area is located on a low lying coastal plain with a slight topographic gradient ofapproximately 20 feet per mile to the southwest The nearest body ofsurface water is the Anaheim Barber City Chaooellocated approximately 0 25 miles west of the site The Santa Ana River Challnel is located approximately 10 mile to the east Urban growth diminishes the amount of pervious land such as open fields where rainfall can percolate into the ground With an increase in impervious area such as streets and roads greater stormwater runoff flows occur The Anaheim Resort area eocompasses approximately 549 5 acres aponion of which is currently unpaved and contains exposed earth materials However the majority CRAlCRA J 7 3 7 3 Groll1ldwa1er and Surface Hydrology 01657 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR of the project area is currently paved Surface runoff from the project area generally flows west directly into the Anaheim Barber City Channel or south to southwest into a storm drain that is located along Katella Avenue Flow within this storm drain ultimately empties into the Anaheim Barber City Channel The entire project area is outside the IOOyear floodplain so the impacts associated with potential flooding during a IOOyear storm event is low for a discussion of earthquake induced flooding please see Section 3 6 Earth Resources On March IS 1990 the County of Orange and the Orange County Flood Control District in cooperation with the incorporated cities in Orange County including Anaheim submitted a NPDES Application No CA 8000180 for an areawide stormwater discharge permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPDES The NPDES permit was adopted in July 1990 The intent ofthe permit is to regulate pollutant discharges and improve water quality in the Santa Ana Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board In compliance with the NPDES Stormwater Permit a baseline Drainage Area Management Plan DAMP was prepared August 1992 The NPDES permit requires development and implementation of Best Management Practices BMP to control the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States The vehicle for this BMP implementation is the DAMP which includes modifications to existing BMPs and other stormwater system management programs to reduce pollutants in the stormwater discharges from industrial commercial and residential areas to the maximum extent practicable Specific requirements are structural controls non structural controls such as education programs management practices and regulatory approaches andenforcement programs In addition an implementation plan is required in the DAMP for site specific structural and non structural BMPs at construction sites commercial industrial construction sites disturbing I acre or more of the total land area and residential construction sites disturbing 5 acres or more The existing runoff conditions and the storm drain impacts ofthe proposed project and related projects are discussed in Section 3 9 8 Storm Drains 3 7 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 3 7 2 1 Gro t D h e Currently the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan study area does not contribute significantly to groundwater recharge The project area involves approximately 549 5 acres of land Of this area co 10 co o CJlAICIlA3 7 3 7 4 GroulIdwQur and Swfact ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim son Specific Plan EIR approximately 72 acres are unpaved and subject to surface water infiltration Based on an average annual rainfall of 12 6 inches 1 05 feet and an estimated infiltration rate of 20 percent of the total rainfall reaching the groundwater basin existing recharge from the 72 acres to the groundwater basin is approximately 15 1 acre feet a year AFY Thus a limited amount of rainwater and irrigation return flow currently reaches the groundwater table The existing agriculture field in the southern portion ofthe Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan encompasses 56 acres and is estimated to pump between 162 and 193 AFY of which 32 AFY to 39 AFY returns to the groundwater as irrigation return flow The maximum total recharge from the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is currently 51 AFY 12 AFY from rainfall plus an additional 39 AFY from irrigation return flow Thus implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan has the potential to remove 51 acrefeet a year AFY of recharge water from the regional groundwater basin known as the South Coast Groundwater Basin The loss of 51 AFY of recharge is a conservative estimate The Specific PI will maintain landscaping throughout the project area and thus will contribute irrigation return flow to the basin Additionally the loss of irrigation return flow does not account for the termination of pumping which removes 162 to 193 AFY from the groundwater basin for irrigation Of this irrigation water 39 AFY currently returns to the groundwater table via deep percolation the remainder is taken up by the crops or evaporated Ultimately following implementation of the Specific Plan and development ofthe agricultural fields with uses consistent with the plan the full 193 AFY will remain in the groundwater basin thus negating the loss of 39 AFY of irrigation return flow Finally the loss of 12 AFY of rainwater is also a maximum estimation The full 12 AFY would be lost if the entire project area were paved this will DOt be the case A portion of the rainwater will percolate through open space areas and enter the groundwater basin Nonetheless the loss of 12 AFY is considered less than sipificant relative to the total amount of recharge to the South Coast Groundwater Basin as a whole The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides guidance and consistency for future proposals and does DOt propose any future developments for the area However it can be assumed that the existing developed areas will be replaced with new paved areas if redeveloped It is anticipated that implementation ofthe Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan will DOt sipificantly affect groundwater recharge in the area Additionally future developments will not withdraw directly from the groundwater basin rather they will contract for water service from the City of Anaheim However approximately 70 percent of the Groundwater and Surfaa Hydrology CRAlCIlA 37 3 7 5 01659 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Aru Jheim Reson Specific Plan EIR water supplied by the City is from groundwater As discussed in Section 3 9 6 water conservation measures will be built into and required of all new projects proposed in the Specific Plan area The demand on groundwater resources will increase substantially with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan however projects will be required to comply with Anaheim s Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance to minimize landscape related water consumption The water conservation measures will reduce overall water consumption within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The property owner developer shall implement dual plumbing where feasible so that reclaimed water can be used for irrigation purposes when availahle 3 7 2 RlDIorr Impacts of the project on the surrounding storm drain system and mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts associated with increased runoff to an insignificant level are addressed in Section 3 9 8 StormDrains During grading andconstruction activities offuture developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries there will be a potential for surface water runoff to carry sediment and small quantities of pollutants into the Stormwater system during precipitation events Soil erosion may occur along project boundaries during construction and in areas where temporary soil storage is required Soil erosion and small quantities ofpollutants such as oil or other fluids used for construction may wash into the storm drain system In addition increased runoff could result in higher flood damage potential for the project area Compliance with the NPDES permit and implementation of required mitigation measures identified in Section 3 7 3 would reduce construction and operation related runoff impacts to a level considered less than significant 3 7 23 W f hlilY De2radatioD The Orange County Sanitation District is proposing to build apipeline to the project area to provide reclaimed water Dames Moore 1992b If constructed reclaimed water could be used for landscape irrigation which would reduce the amoum ofpotable water demands by implemenwion of the Specific Plan The water quality char l eristics of the reclaimed water are not currently known however water that has received tertiary treatment is Jenerally suitable for irriJation It is assumed that approximately 20 percent the current rate of the reclaimed water used for land irrigation would percolate downward and eventually enter the groundwater basin Although the total dissolved solids TDS of the reclaimed water might be higher than that of groundwater percolation of o 10 10 o e 3 7j Groll1ldwaler and Surface Hydrology CIlAICRA3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan E1R reclaimed water is not expected to cause degradation of the quality of groundwater because of the limited quantity of reclaimed water that would reach the groundwater and the cleansing that takes place as it flows through the ground to the aquifer Reclaimed water is commonly used for recharging groundwater Additionally the use of reclaimed water reduces the demand on potable water thereby reducing freshwater withdrawals from the groundwater basin which will help to maintain the groundwater table at or above its existing level Impacts to groundwater quality from the potential use of reclaimed water for landscape irrigation needs in the project area are not significant Ifimplemented the proposed project will remove the agriculture fields from production Currently approximately 32 to 39 AFY ofirrigation return water from the fields reenters the groundwater basin carrying residue salts fertilizers herbicides andpesticides Development ofthe proposed project will eliminate affected return flows from the fields entering the groundwater basin at the project site a beneficial groundwater quality effect The proposed project does not represent apotential hazard to groundwater quality from contaminatioQ by hazardous materials No significant impacts are expected For a further discussion on hazardous materials in the project area see Section 3 10 Hazardous Materials Surface Water Quality Development activities would increase the potential for stormwater runoff to transport surface water contaminants from roadway surfaces lawns driveways and parking lots and other exposed structural and landscape surfaces into the storm drain system The County ofOrange has an active surface water quality monitoring program in the permit area which includes the project study area Dry weather sampling is performed and wet weather sampling is performed during significant storm events 0 5 inches ofrainfall Stormwater runoffsamples collected are analyzed for nutrients trace metals specific conductance dissolved oxygen lcwpetatdre and pH Sediment samples are also collected and analyzed for radiochemical constituents only at Huntington Harbour organics and trace metals on a semi annual basis This monitoring program includes 21 water quality monitoring stations 17 water level stations 12 of which are stream gaging stations and 31 precipitation stations Most of the water quality monitoring stations are located at storm drain systems associated with drainage areas in which land use activities have been identified to significantly affect the beneficial uses of waters in Orange County These drainage areas characterized as agricultural commercial and industrial are mainly located upstream of Newport Bay Those pollutants that have been identified to cause significant threat to the water quality of Newport Bay include nutrients especially nitrates pesticides herbicides and suspended solids CRAlCRA 3 7 3 7 7 Groll1ldwaler and SU1j ace Hydrology 01661 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e AnLlhejm Reson Specific Plan EIR The surface water quality monitoring program will continue after the Specific Plan area is fully buildout The samples will reveal any increases of pollutants discharged into the local storm drains The sampling program will identify unauthorized use ofhazardous materials and the location of the violator so that the appropriate actions can be taken by the City and County Such actions may include remediation and the assessment of fines on the violator The Regional Water Quality Control Board currently regulates discharges ofpoint source process wastewater and non process wastewater and stormwater to storm drain systems through NPDES permits Industrial stormwater dischargers are required to cooperate with the County of Orange to control the discharge of pollutants in the stormwater runofffrom individual facilities or to obtain individual industrial stormwater discharge permits from the Regional Board Inaccordance with the County s NPDES stormwater discharge regulations structural best management practices BMP placed throughout the specific plan area will achieve water quality enhancement through filtration sedimentation and other standard practices In addition to these structural BMPs pollutant loading into stormwater can be reduced by implementing nonstructural BMPs Nonstructural BMPs are those pollutant controls which are a part of the development s maintenance system rather than its infrastructure and can include recycling signage e g no dumping street sweeping hazardous waste collection and fertilizer management These practices can be highly effective at reducing runoff quality constituent concentrations in receiving waters as well as total pollutant loads per storm Implementation ofthe Specific Plan would allow for the conversion ofthe existing S6acreagricultural field to hotel motel and accessory uses Future development of the agricultural field will lessen pesticide and herbicide contamination from agricultural ruooff This is discussed further in Section 3 10 Hazardous Materials The increase in the amount of paved land in the project area will decrease the volume ofpotentially affected surface water that will infiltrate to the groundwater The potential for impact of surface water quality from implementation of the Specific Plan will not be significant e d PO Ii 3 7 3 MITIGATION MEASURES rst bu h J l f J oCc J1 iSS r clo 0 MitintiOD Meuure 3 7 1 Prior to approval ofagrading plan the property owner developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Ruooff Management Plan MD for review and approval by the Public W orks Engineering DepartmelJ Development rn ion 1It Orange County Environmental Management Agency 11M RIgisalll W Q aI I Collt ol Belll d lIIId The Master Plan shall include but oot be limited to the following items 3 7 8 01662 Groll1ldwater and Surface Hydrology CRAlCJlA 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan E1R Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the lOOyear stormj b A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project generated drainage and runoff a c Def il 459esame81 sf eJE istiRg ater lVali1iy7 pn nti 1 ulit q lali impacts and l npeiptiQR qf prepesad m8Hvra to 1Ili iAtaiA w 1tlr quality te the wql liRld by tha Nltio lI nt nicthD gp P limigti rc lR DES 2119 its rllollll1Itinnll ifthu tit lB tbt fnl1nwing L IR88Fpec l1tiv l1 uf Jtitletural Rtf IIOnf tyral City s9R elIes RMPJ B lf sh ll tQ tbf tJy lall I iRehule InK not 1 b A t6 CQAt1 ift 8Rt af fIlM8nty aDd pailrt RUtes 88 site rep dis esal sf vehle Nel and malBteR Bee wastes dia s3a1 eftrash ass aahriB prGl ailJiliag water l l h rlnUln nf paHgQ areas ge1B Mini a ud Jh t9IU1tRJ tiQg up HQ J04 by tJPDES IU PlBiij and tteati8 ng for 9B1trueU8B ll Gnkerr i1R Ut 8 praetistS isgiRlOFisg deteib p 9GllduRI JIft res sB5ihilities sf 86 R tpg shall 11 9 be d Gri td 2 1A 1 8flti6ft of mcasw to wOili ll with vl I LuUO h dentified tay die ia itb t liYacer R869vrses Caaerel Beard S RCB atetew d wGb 1 Iuaii l Nuhul piau VI Alld lUr AtG s 1d9p April 11 1001 J g 1Y ipt iS8 sf 4 4b qwdlit meaitetiBg IrsfFIRl t6 1B8Mter Iter 4dd l Elarieg IIIl4 lIb IU Rt te and te t IIltt tile efft lv g 9f B fh iIiy IIIs iteriRtJ pre h1I Aatif l tbp pIA1ull R Y r slISihle fer implwA t tM P V6 f II1JU of in nlnn I g lIiII t1n frn d areas 4cijatica tlQa 1 inl1ftl gf p l1l1t JIf eate ill fUBeff tit will he rnn itnrarl I tnt JIl vlpaRd l8lids l i w F lity unp1ms ItaV9R1 diM 8f flpf L uC uuufC from the JOM idldfied hnVI SIImptill p gr elleI81Y md ditl deli to p ancJ I SIInd tinn rlilll 6 lIledlad fer taI 1 d eellestad RQIII rim prnl1l1m iftt IIIil1l 1I r ElSU1Fl g ivfl ftl C nfRLI Pa ftIm GttAitinn 1 1 1 if CQ iKRUe tiu af he BMPs Ie the 81 tMCl ds ideMit4 C I aillM Midfadon Measure 3 7 1 Prior to approval of a grading plan the property owner developer shall submit for review and approval of the City Eng a Water Quality Management Plan wQMP specifically identifying Best Management Practices BMPs that will be used onsite to control predictable pollutant run lff CRAlCRA 3 7 3 7 9 Groundwater and Su1foce Hydrology 01663 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR This WQMP shall identify the structural and non structural measures specified in the AppendiJs70fthe C 1 Drainage Area Management Plan detailing implementath n whenever they are applicahle to the project when the project has a below grade loading dock for example the assignment of long term maintenance responsibilities specifying the developer parcel owner maintenance association lessee etc and shall reference the location s of structural BMPs Mitilation Measure 3 7 3 Prior to approval of grading plan or issuance of demolition permit and clearing the property owner developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Const ruction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to City Enginee litirat 3 T4 Pliul w i t SUAU N uf h bulldbIg pcludL the pruperLY dcvduVCl Ch I f lbmit bllQ apiRg uti irrigatiSB plans ed III h 6cd u JI ucllt Pregram toi nteJtak aB6 pSlfie tJ lnCt1t1IatieB af str 181Mlsell iBg ith the pealSs seR8ffUetieB This Ilfulaeepe 11ft 1Jkall lwd G b lIfi to OOlltf the ee effeFliliMFs aB4 pestieidC3 8fKI lit irrigati ilIlIj lttm deei6ud tv Udllilll u r IWhuff and 8 eRVatwiq Ad JitioAlI ly I The lanElseape t1 hall he rep MEl eeFlified h a lieensed landscape arekitet Del ElIiG areki l oihcdl uhlU l lAUo IOCOC4Cct W ith AHIleiIB 9 Watll iftiailRSY 9rdiBeee II GuiA lin b The militias 1 Ragt At D grarn tlhall ify for IRQRit9riRg Ule iuigatioR sYltem ed shall he desipM Y as irriptis8 eBliIleer Fhe 9y te81 sRall DI lM that irr4d vu l du uuL thiftfiItratie8 af 188al S9i1G and tblt tJI appH tioD of f nilieers IBEI eIlisidee do 1 Ippl op iaf 1 vp I of frtMIUeneies 8 tbt lM I p and iJ rigati R 111III ahall IJ devtl8J ed to he eeBSisteflt W th tbG p iaifl uC dw Speeifie Pl kidl r tlire at the lb w M ltI ItIT allo ft 4ft txt1 tJi lhall F IEI Bet efteeed 89pw l etllL 1B88D IRIN8I I V i99 SF that the I leap irrilaHSIl atem hul Il ater eoRlin8 NIi Ill II 19 80 imllti98 ke uu4 irfigatien MedtdiB i Ble fle IIB1iBg e81MR111 cUD A Bsil moiJh re JeftS6f5 ni saer w G1ISCf 6 iipllle8t IB dKiell all U 5 duu SYSICII D ghidl be d ipad 88 that th II ill 9U Ifo oa p ly it h reelailRed water t1Il4X1L system is a adbl 1E I IIIJI J 7 Pricr Ie nu C I fadml pllB fer I JpcGifie e clv prejeet the IU8Perty ew d 1o thall obtaiB feI lN tlPDES pf 16 RelR tIl Vl ReSBUfce5 1 08 1 i hhBU afgb 8 ofqqoirtd peADi rIblll sultmi1Y4 te III City EaliReer CRAlCRA 3 7 3 7 10 01664 Groundwater and Surface ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR Mitil Btion Measure 3 7 During project operations the property owner developer shall provide for the following cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim on a basis including but not limited to private streets and parking lots The use of waterto clean streets paved areas parking lots and other areas and flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited 5 Mitillation M ure 3 7 7 P ior to eacb final building and zoning ins ion the property fer cc cl 6 f cls o ffc 0 n c J Cer owner developer shall submit a i b4 7 leel iii S fi PI II II labII III III I II aaRlRg wunan as 888f lU 1 1 a u I at I an Gsape IrrIgation systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans 3 7 4 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS No significant impacts related to groundwater or surface water bydrology are anticipated s J I II 0 p m T r Me4 So l 1 1 r 1l c prop HdU tDt s J YS iS W sc pc r J l J s So rcc CJ oJ r ur r f L r v lo tr t1 Co 5 4IV oD ytt c rO r o c o cv CltAlCIlA3 7 3 7 11 Groundwater and Swfaa Hydrology 01665 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e 3 8 POPULATION AND HOUSING This section contains analysis based on a technical report incorporated by reference into this analysis The Employment Population and Housing Report prepared by Hamilton Rabinovitz Alschuler Inc 1992 for The Disneyland Resort EIR Technical Appendix H of The Disneyland Resort EIR Relevant baseline information from this report is summarized in this section Where applicable the information contained in this Employment Population and Housing section of the report reflects information based on the final analysis presented in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical report referenced above has been updated verified and or validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR This section presents an analysis of the employment population and housing conditions potentially affected by the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan The following geographic zones were analyzed The City of Anaheim The City of Anaheim is addressed with respect to employment population and housing The Northwest Orange County Subregion The Southern California Association of Governments SCAG and the South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD analyze jobslbousing balance at the subregional level The project is located in the Northwest Orange County Subregion 3 8 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS 3 8 1 1 FmolQYment Reant Employment Table 3 8 1 Recent Employment Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 19801990 summarizes the 19801990 historical trend in total employment in each geographic zone around the project site as forecast by SCAG These data show that employment from 1980 to 1990 increased dramatically in both geographic zones employment increased 17 peccent about 24 000 new jobs in the City of Anaheim and 25 percent about 152 000 new jobs in the Subregion The SCAG employment figures for 1990 were derived from the Regional Growth Mauagement Plan GMP forecast from 1987 to 2010 as explained in Appendix H of The Disneyland Resort Draft EIR Employment Population and Housing Report incorporated by reference This EIR uses a straight e 3 8 1 EmploymenJ Population and Housing CRAlCRAJI ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR line interpolation method based on the population projection methodology and results contained in the GMP to determine employment figures for 1990 TABLE 3 81 RECENT EMPLOYMENT TRENDS IN TWO ZONES AROUND TIlE PROJECT AREA 1 8O 1 9O 1980 144 923 [PHONE REDACTED] 90Change Percent 1990 169 351 755 693 Geographic Zone City of Anaheim Northwest Orange Co Subregion Source SCAG 1987 HR A 1992 1987 162 321 727 825 17 25 These relative and absolute increases in employment growth in both geographic zones between 1980 and 1990 reflect the continuing development ofSouthern CaI ifornia into one ofthe major metropolitan regions in the world However more recent employment trends have resulted in significant job loss in Orange County Between May 1991 and May 1992 29 600 non agricultural jobs were lost in the County of the jobs lost 2 900 were in the service sector of the economy California Employment Development Department 1992 The overall development of the region has been fueled by 1 continued population and manufacturing growth in Los Angeles County 2 the transformation of Orange County from a suburban bedroom community that housed workers employed in Los Angeles County into a major manufacturing tourism and professional services center that competes successfully in regional national and international markets and 3 the development of San Bernardino and Riverside counties into major residential communities that supply workers to the growinll manufacturing and services sector employers located in Orange and Los Angeles coumies One recent study suggests that Anaheim s rapid growth over the decade has resulted in its emergence as the principal city within a new Central Orange County urban core Robert Charles Lesser and Company 1989 Urban cores are defined in this study as a feature of post industrial metropolitan structure consisting of multiple centers with concentrations of regional and export lriented employment The study suggests that there are 26 such urban cores in the Jl eater Los Angeles CIlAICItA31 3 8 2 EmployfMnI PopuJalion and Housing e e ---PAGE BREAK--- I Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e I metropolitan area four of which are located in the Central Orange County urban core Anaheim Garden Grove Tustin and Santa Ana The Central Orange County Core is the second fastest growing core not only within Orange County but also among all urban cores in the state and is superseded only by aneighboring Orange County urban core that includes the John Wayne Airport area Irvine and Costa Mesa According to this analysis Anaheim s rapid growth is due largely to its superior freeway access and availability of housing including its supply of executive housing in the Anaheim Hills area which together have made it an attractive location for back office space users and subregional headquarters of major corporations Tahle 3 8 2 Unemployment Rate Trends in the City of Anaheim and Orange County 1980 1990 summarizes the 198090 trend in unemployment rates in the City of Anaheim and Orange County as a whole These data show that 1980 unemployment rates in Anaheim and the County wereessentially the same 4 3 to 4 7 percent and that by 1990 the unemployment rate in both zones declined about one percentage point based on California Employment Development Department data for Orange County However unemployment has increased since 1990 Unemployment rates in Anaheim increased by 2 4 percentage points to 6 1 percent in 1993 a 40 percent increase in unemployment and by 2 0 percentage points to 5 3 percent in the County a 38 percent increase in unemployment TABLE 3 82 RATE TRENDS IN TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND ORANGE COUNTY 1 1990 19801990 1991993 Change Change Geograpbic Zone 1980 1990 1993 Amount Amount City of Anaheim 4 7 3 7 6 1 10 21 2 4 40 Orange County 4 3 3 3 5 3 10 23 2 0 38 Source UDS 1990 California Employment Development Department 1990 HR A 1992 Ben Montes California Employment Development Department Labor Monitoring Information Division March 1994 e CRAlCRA31 3 8 3 EmploymeN Population and Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Future Employment SCAG s forecast ofemployment for 2000 and 2010 for each of the two geographic zones around the project area is shown in Table 3 8 3 Employment Forecasts for Two Zones Around the Project Area 20002010 Unlike the employment trends from 1980 to 1990 reported in Table 3 8 1 SCAG s employment forecast predicts a more consistent 11 to 12 percent rate of growth within the two geographic zones in the future Overall SCAG forecasts employment increases of 28 percent for Anaheim and 25 percent for the Subregion from 1990 to 2010 TABLE 3 83 EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS FOR TWO ZONES AROUND THE PROJECT AREA 20002010 20002010 Change 19902010 Change Geograpbic Zone 2000 2010 Amount Percent Amount Percent City of Anaheim 192 785 216 218 23 433 12 46 800 28 Northwest Orange 848 588 941 483 92 895 11 185 800 25 Co Subregion Source SCAG 1989 HR A 1992 e Although the rate of employment growth in both zones is forecast to diminish during the 19902000 period and again from 2000 to 2010 relative to the increases recorded from 1980 to 1990 the projected absolute increases in employment are nonetheless substantial The 19902000 increase is forecast to be 14 percent in Anaheim and 17 percent in the subregion As shown in Table 3 8 3 Employment Forecasts for Two Zones Around the Project Area 20002010 the total increase over the 2oyear period from 1990 to 2010 is forecast to range from about 47 000 employees in Anabeim to about 186 000 in the Subregion Even prior to the economic recession a number offactors were expected to contribute to thepredicted slowing rate ofjob creation projected over the next 20 years especially within Orange County First and most importantly are the relatively bigh costs of land and bousing and the congestion related costs of travel such as length of time required to commute loss of revenue producing time and costs incurred due to delays which are expected to encourage IIIOre residential development in outlying areas such as Riverside and San Bernardino counties compared to Orange County Lower land costs and a larger supply of resident workers in these areas are also expected to cause employers to follow the labor force Secood the age distribution is projected to shift upward and reduce the size of the 3 8 4 Fmploymenl PopuJarion and Housing o CRAlCRA31 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e potential labor force in Orange County expect the percentage of working age residents 16 64 to fall from the current 68 percent of the county population to 67 percent by 2010 and continue declining to 63 percent by 2020 as reported by the Orange County Administrative Office OCP 92 However several factors are likely to offset at least partially the decreasing percentage ofthe population in this age group First SCAG s projected increases in the absolute size of the labor force over the 19902010 period based on increases in the total county population are substantial Second national level projections of labor force participation rates by the U S Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the percentage of working age persons active in the labor force is expected to increase from 65 6 percent in 1987 to 67 8 percent by 2000 Thus even though the percentage of the total population in the working age group is projected to decline that percentage will represent a substantially larger number ofthe working age people Resident Workers Resident workers are those persons who reside within ageographic area and are also members of th labor force in that same area Table 3 8 4 Resident Worker Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 19801990 summarizes the 1980 1990 trend in the number of resident workers in each of the two geographic zones around the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area These data show a consistent growth trend across both geographic areas 10 Anaheim the number of resident workers increased by 10 percent over the decade while the SCAG Subregion experienced an increase of 13 percent The SCAG resident worker figures for 1990 are based on a straight line interpolation of the 2010 forecast in the Regional Growth Management Plan In absolute terms the increases in resident worken range from about 12 000 additional working residents in Anaheim to about 89 000 additional working residents in the Subregion I TABLE 3 8 4 RESIDENT WORKER TRENDS IN TWO ZONES AROUND TIlE PROJECT AREA 19801990 19801990 Clauge Geoaraphic Zone 1980 1987 1990 Amount Percent City of Anaheim 119 707 125 093 131 438 11 731 10 Northwest Orange Co 682 465 745 065 TI1 928 89 463 13 Subregion Source SCAG 1989 HR A 1992 e CItAICIlA JI 3 85 Employmenr Popul41ion and Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e These trends indicate that in each of the geographic zones around the project area the size of the resident labor force grew less rapidly than employment in absolute and relative terms For example while employment grew by 17 percent in Anaheim from 1980 to 1990 the resident labor force grew at about one half that rate or 10 percent In ahsolute terms employment grew by about 24 000 persons while the resident labor force grew by about 12 000 persons The more rapid growth in employment relative to the resident labor force is consistent with the continued transformation of Orange County and in this case Anaheim and the Subregion from their residential agricultural roots into major urban employment centers that attract employees from outside the City boundaries Future Resident Workers Projected growth in the number of resident workers to 2010 is shown in Table 3 8 5 Resident Worker Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area 20002010 for each ofthe geographic zones around the project area SCAG forecasts that from 1990 to 2000 and from 2000 to 2010 the number of resident workers will grow at a faster pace than employment In percentage terms the number of resident workers in the Subregion will according to the SCAG forecast from 2000 to 2010 grow 10 percent while Anaheim s resident labor force will grow 14 percent Over the 19902010 period Anaheim s growth in resident workers will outpace empJoymem growth an increase of 28 percent employment growth vs an increase of 32 percent resident worker growth but in the Subregion employment will grow faster than the resident worker population an increase of 25 percent employment growth vs an increase of 23 percent resident worker growth e TABLE 3 85 RFSIDENT WORKER FORECAST FOR TWO ZONES AROUND TIlE PROJECI AREA 20002010 20002010 Change 19902010 Change Geographic Zone 2000 2010 Amount Percent Amount Percent City of Anaheim 152 589 173 739 21 150 14 42 300 32 Northwest Orange 861 473 951 018 89 545 10 179 100 23 Co Subregion Source SCAG 1989 HRItA 1992 CIlA CRA JI 3 8 01671 Emp nl Popularion fJIUl Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e 3 8 1 2 PoDulation Recent Population Size Trends Table 3 8 6 Recent Population Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 19801990 summarizes the 198090 trend in population for the two geographic zones around the project area The 1990 census data show that both Anabeim and the Subregion grew much faster over the decade than was assumed in SCAG s regional growth forecast The Anabeim population grew by about 46 000 people and the Subregion grew by about 255 000 between 1980 and 1990 TABLE 3 8 6 RECENT POPULATION TRENDS IN TWO WNES AROUND THE PROJECT AREA 19801990 19801990 Change Geographic Zone Source 1980 1990 Amount Percent City of Anaheim a 220 140 266 406 46 266 21 b 250 313 30 173 14 Northwest a 1 362 165 1 617 375 255 210 19 Orange Co b 1 508 784 146 619 11 SubregioD Actual based on U S Census data SCAG forecast for comparison Difference betweeo 1980 Census data and SCAG projections Source U S Census Bureau 1990 SCAG 1989 HR A 1992 Future Population Size Table 3 8 7 PopulatioD Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area 20002010 summarizes SCAG s population projections for the 19902010 period including an estimate for 2000 which is based on an interpolation betweeo SCAG s 1987 estimate and its 2010 forecast Overall the SCAG forecast indicates that the percentage increases in population will decline somewbat from the assumed 11 to 14 percent range estimated over the 198090 period to 7 to 10 percent over the period from 1990 to 2000 and more to 7 to 9 percent from 20002010 Overall SCAG predicts that Orange County s population will increase by about 30 percent betweeo 1990 and 2010 due in part to the potential for considerable residential development in tbe soutbern portion of tbe County e CIlA CIlA31 3 8 7 EmploymeN PopuIalion and Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 87 POPULATION FORECAST FOR lWO ZONES AROUND THE PROJECT AREA 20002010 20002010 Change 19902010 Change Geographic Zone 2000 2010 Amount Percent Amount Percent City of Anaheim 276 508 302 704 26 196 9 36 298 14 Nonhwest Orange Co Subregion 1 615 638 1 722 491 106 853 7 105 116 6 5 Source SCAG 1989 HR A 1992 Although the rate of population growth in the SCAG forecast is expected to moderate somewhat in each zone over the projection period the absolute increases in population between 1990 and 2010 are nonetheless substantial About 36 000 more people are expected in Anaheim and about 105 000 more are expected in the Subregion Population Age Distribution Tahle 3 8 8 Age Distribution and Median Age Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 1980 1990 summarizes the age distribution and median age ofthe population in the two geographic zones surrounding the project area for the 19801990 period These data show a consistent pattern of an aging population in both zones TABLE 3 8 AGE JON AND MEDIAN AGE TRENDS IN lWO ZONES AROUND THE PROJECT AREA 19801990 1980 1990 Age Distribution Age Distribution Median Median Geographic Zone 017 18 64 65 Age 017 18 64 65 Age City of Anaheim 27 Ai 65 8 28 8 26 66 8 29 9 Nonhwest Orange Co Subregion 28 64 8 28 8 25 66 9 29 0 Source U S Census Bureau 1990 SCAG 1989 HR A 1992 01673 CRAlCRA U 3 8 8 Employmenr Populotion and Housing e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e Although there are no known projections of the population age distribution to 2010 that are available at the city and census tract level two such projections have been made for Orange County Both projections suggest that the aging trend in the population from 1980 to 1990 described below is likely to continue but at a slower rate A State Department of Finance projection indicates that the percentage of working age persons Ie 16 64 years old is expected to fall from 68 percent in 1990 to 67 percent by 2010 and then to 63 percent by 2020 OCP 92 Woods Poole Economics an econometric and demographic forecasting group projects that the median age of the population in Orange County will increase from 32 5 years in 1990 to 36 4 years in 2010 Furthermore their projections indicate that the percentage of persons between 20 and 64 will fall from 63 4 percent in 1990 to 62 9 percent in 2010 Woods Poole 1990 3 8 1 3 HousiDl Table 3 8 9 Recent Housing Stock Trends in Two Zones Around the Project Area 19801990 summarizes the 19801990 trend in the size of the housing stock in each ofthe two geographic zon around the project area These data show that the percentage increases in the size of the housing stock are similar 12 to 13 percent in both zones Over the decade about 11 000 units were added in Anabeim and about 57 000 were added in the Subregion TABLE 38 9 RECENT HOUSING srocK TRENDS IN lWO ZONES AROUND TIlE PROJECT AREA 19801990 198090 Change Percentage of Units Vacant Geographic Zone Source 1980 1987 1990 Amount Percent 1990 City of Anaheim a 82 647 88 539 93 177 10 530 13 6 b 92 567 9 920 12 Northwest a 491 048 525 970 548 491 57 443 12 4 4 Orange Co b 542 447 51 399 11 Subregion Actual based on Census data SCAG estimate for comparison Difference between 1980 Census data and SCAG projections Source U S Census Bureau 1990 SCAG 1989 HR A 1992 e 3 8 9 Employmelll Population and Housing CRAlCRA 3 I ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR SCAG s forecast of housing construction in the two geographic zones is shown in Table 3 8 10 Housing Construction Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area 2000 2010 for 2000 and 2010 The housing unit counts for 1990 and 2000 are based on an interpolation of the SCAG Growth Management Plan forecast from 1987 to 2010 Unlike the similar trends reported in Table 3 8 9 the percentage increases in housing units across the two zones differ by as much as 9 percentage points over the 1990 2010 forecast period from 19 percent in the Subregion to 28 percent in Anaheim TABLE 3 810 HOUSING CONSTRUCTION FORECAST FOR twO ZONES AROUND TIlE PROJECT AREA 2000010 20002010 Change 19902010 Change Geographic Zone 2000 2010 Amount Percent Amount Percent City of Anaheim 105 992 119 418 13 426 13 26 241 28 Northwest Orange 598 447 654 199 55 752 9 105 708 19 Co Subregion Source SCAG 1989 HRA 1992 City housing programs are discussed in Section 3 1 Land UseRelated Plans and Policies 3 8 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 3 8 2 1 Emolovment Adoption ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would not result directly in employment opportunities hleau3e the p l du aad mel a the Sf apeNlisR ofa ihC m4J Kses R II the Specific Plan provides for a colICise framework of developmem standards and guidelines for future developmem in the area and establishes objectives policies and land use densities with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries However the implementation of future development under the guidance of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will directly add new jobs as a result of construction and operation The numbers of construction and other related jobs generated by the project cannot be calculated at this Stale ofproject development as the individual uses and future developments within the Anaheim Resort have not yet been determined bowever the influence of the proposed Specific Plan on the job market is not expected to generate significant growth beyond the growth assumed in regional plans These projects will also induce new jobs as a result of income spent by workers filling CRAlCRA 31 3 8 10 Employmou Population and Housing e Ie e o ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e these direct jobs resulting in indirect employment to the extent that direct employment leads to local purchases ofmaterials and services Employment generated by futuredevelopment within the Specific Plan area is considered an indirect impact of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Indirect and induced employment impacts are not directly related to or under the control of the City of Anaheim Indirect and induced employment impacts result from the actions and decisions of businesses workers and households that benefit from the demand for goods and services required to construct develop and maintain business within the Specific Plan area It is not possible to ascertain with any reasonable degree ofprecision what the complex series ofeconomic decisions will be in response to the projected construction of future development projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The location and magnitude of the indirect and induced impacts in the region will only be apparent once a property owner developer pursues the economic opportunities created by the Specific Plan and act on their decision but not until then The additional employment generated by the future development is considered a beneficial impact for job growth in Anaheim and the region Table 3 8 11 Estimated Net Employment Within the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan Area prese an estimate of the number of new jobs that will be created as a result of individual hotel and motel projects allowed under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by the year 2010 An average employment generation factorof 1 11 employees per hotel or motel room was used to determine direct employment generation by future development within the Specific Plan Area Although the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will govern both hotel and motel development the higher hotel employee generation factor 1 11 employees per room was used rather than the accepted 0 9 employees per room Institute of Transportation Engineers 1987 for motels because the number of hotel versus motel rooms to be built is not known at this time The estimate of future new hotel motel employment opportunities would therefore represent an estimate on the high side offuture employment in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area to respond to potential impacts Given that hotels tend to have a higher employee to hotel occupant ratio than motels and that the hotels which may develop within the Anaheim Resort could be resort oriented the 1 11 employee per room generation factor wu assumed to provide a more reasonable and yet conservative estimate of the number ofemployees anticipated to be generated by 2010 Thus at 2010 future development allowed under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will create a total of 18 113 jobs These job opportunities are greater than six times the 2 900 service sector jobs lost in Orange County between May 1991 and May 1992 California Employment Development Department e C IlACRA 3 1 3 8 11 Employmou Populalion and Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 811 ESI1MATED NET EMPLOYMENT WITIUN THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA 2010 HotelMotel Rooms in Anaheim Resort Average Employment Generation Factor New HotellMotel Employment 12 421 18 113 30 S34 Existing Specific Plan Year 2010 Year 2010 Total Source City of Anaheim 1992 MBA 1994 11 190 1Ua IIroom IIroom 27 S08 II room The net increase of 18 113 jobs within the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area by 2010 represents a relatively small percentage of the SCAG employment forecast for Anaheim in 2010 ie about 8 0 percent refer to Table 3 8 3 However net new jobs projected to be generated by future development within the Specific Plan area will account for about 39 percent of the new jobs forecast to be added in Anaheim between 1990 and 2010 These jobs represent about 2 0 percent of the employment forecast by SCAG for the Subregion in 2010 and about 10 0 percent of employment growth forecast for the Subregion during the 19902010 projection period These relationships are presented in Table 3 8 12 Indirect Project Employment Compared to 2010 Forecast for Two Zones Around the Project Area TABLE 3 812 INDIRECT PROJECT EMPLOYMENT COMPARED TO 2010 FORECAST FOR TWO ZONES AROUND THE PROJECT AREA Geographic Zone City of Anaheim Net Jobs for Future development Northwest Orange County Subregion Net Jobs for Future development Source SCAG 1989 MBA 1994 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area Indirect Jobs as PercetIl of 2010 Forecast SCAG Indirect Jobs as PercetIl of Projected Job Growth 19902010 8 0 39 0 2 0 10 0 01677 CRAlCRA3 1 3 8 12 Employ nJ PopulaJion and Housing e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e Viewed from another perspective the number ofjob opportunities generated by future development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be equal to 43 percent ofthe 19902010 increase in the City s resident labor force and 10 percent ofthe 19902010 increase within the SCAG subregion workers according to the SCAG forecast refer to Table 3 8 5 The primary type of employment opportunities within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are visitor serving commercial uses including hotels motels retail and restaurant uses These positions generally do not require a highly skilled or educated labor force The nature ofthese opportunities suggests that the potential labor supply in the City and Subregion will exceed the demand for additional labor indirectly generated by the project It is likely that the mlijority of the employees needed would be found in the subregional resident labor force The implementation of the project is not expected to induce significant migration into Southern California or substantially increase intra urban migration As noted above no direct employment impacts would result from implementation ofthe Specific Plan The indirect environmental impacts of individual project implementation within the Specific Plan area are not considered significant I I I I In addition to the 18 113 jobs associated with hotel and motel development induced by the project indirect employment in other economic sectors will result including jobs in the retail commercial and industrial sectors Further the construction of future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries would provide additional constructionjob opportunities This is considered a beneficial impact ConstrUction employees typically do not permanently relocate for a project Although the constrUction buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will take place over many years most of the required trades and constrUction personnel will be working for specific segments of the constrUction period on specific developments within the Specific Plan area In addition unemployment in the constrUction field is currently high there are many unemployed or underemployed constrUction workers in the region who would not have to relocate for project employment Because of the temporary nature of coDStrUction jobs these jobs are not expected to result in significant impacts on population or honsing growth in the area 3 8 22 PnnI I tinn Permitted land uses under the proposed Specific Plan regulatiODS do not include dwelling units with the exception of the existing mobilehomes located in the Mobilehome Park MHP Overlay The Specific Plan therefore will not result in any direct increase in population within either Anaheim or the Subregion nor will the future developments that will be constrUcted under the Specific Plan include any dwelling units To the extent that employees and indirect or induced employment associated with specific developments within the Anaheim Resort result in net new households in the e CIlAICRA31 3 8 13 Employmuu Population 01Id Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR area an indirect increase in population would occur As noted in Section 3 8 2 3 Housing Impacts this indirect population increase is not expected to result in significant population impacts Although implementation ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would not result in any direct impacts on population an estimate was made of indirect population increases based on projected employment in the land uses allowed under the Specific Plan It is estimated that a maximum of 18 113 new employment opportunities in hotels and motels would be generated in the Anaheim Resort by the year 2010 Based on a survey of Disneyland cast and the HRA study of employment and housing for The Disneyland Resort project it is estimated that approximately 13 3 percent ofnew hotel and motel employees would choose to relocate into the City of Anaheim Using this percentage approximately 2 409 new hotel and motel employees or 2 409 new households would move their residences to Anaheim by 2010 Assuming only one Anaheim Resort employee per new household at the City average of 3 1 persons per household the new households would result in 7 468 new residents The anticipated population increase from the indirect employment generated by future developments within the Anaheim Resort would not result in significant indirect population impacts because the estimated population increase associated with the indirect employment growth is well within 21 percent of the growth projections for the City from 1990 to 2010 3 8 23 Housinll Imoacts The implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan does not include the construction ofany new dwelling units nor the removal of existing residential units However the projected indirect employment increase generated by future developments within the Anaheim Resort will result in an indirect increase in the demand for housing within the City ofAnaheim In addition implementation of future development projects in the mobile home park overlay areas located east of Haster Street and south of Katella Avenue and north of Ball Road and west of Harbor Boulevard could result in the ultimate removal ofas many as 190 mobile home spaces The impact of removal ofthese housing units is addressed in Section 3 2 2 2 Land Use Compatibility Change ofLand Uses The potential impact of increased employment on housing is discussed below The additional hotel and motel employment opportunities anticipated within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are not anticipated to attract employees from outside the Region The types of positions that will be available do not generally require a high level of skill or education unavailable among resident workers in the City and Subregion However these employment opportunities may encourage a number of workers within the Region or Subregion to move into the City of Anaheim to be closer to theirplace of employment A number offactors affect a household s decision to relocate including whether the employee is a full or pan time worker and a primary or secondary wage earner CIlAICRA31 3 8 14 Employmenr Population and Housing e e @e o ---PAGE BREAK--- t Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e within the household Based on the survey of existing Disneyland employees and the HRA study of employment and housing characteristics and impacts Appendix H ofThe Disneyland Resort Draft EIR approximately 13 3 percent of hotel employees are likely to move to Anaheim The HR A study applied this percentage to the number of full time equivalent FTE primary wage earners positions projected for new Disneyland Resort hotels to derive the number of new hotel employees projected to move into the City Because information on the individual employment and housing characteristics of potential employees within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is not known the 13 3 percent was applied to the total number of anticipated employees from new hotel and motel development Thus it is projected that specific development within the Specific Plan area may generate an indirect impact of 2 409 new hotel motel employees moving to Anaheim from outside the City by 2010 As noted in Section 3 8 2 1 Employment this is based on an average employment generation factor of L 11 employee per hotel or motel room and maximum densities within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Therefore the number of new employees expected to move into the City and the increase in housing demand also represents a maximum As new hotels and motels will be developed over several years this increased demand for housing will be spread over th development years and will not occur in anyone year In addition as the unemployment rate is currently over 5 percent in Orange County many of the future employees may be currently unemployed residents of the City of Anaheim which would reduce the number of employees who would potentially relocate to the City of Anaheim The indirect demand for 2 409 housing units by 2010 represents 9 0 percent ofthe projected increase in the City s housing stock from 1990 to 2010 and 2 0 percent of the total number of housing units projected for the City in 2010 In addition current vacancy rates of6 14 percent for the City indicate the availability of approximately 5 721 dwelling units Department of Finance 1994 Therefore based on the size of the indirect need for housing compared to projected housing availability this impact is not anticipated to be significant Although there are 110 significant impacts anticipated with regard to the number of housing units needed by employees moving to Anaheim from implementation of the Specific Plan this EIR also addresses the affordability of currently available housing compared to the salary ranges of new employees The type of employment position will help determine the approximate salary range of future employees and the number of employees moving into Anaheim that may need affordable housing As indicated in Table 3 8 13 Estimated New Employees by Job Type the majority of new hotel motel employees would be in service positions including housekeepers and maintenance personnel Based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data over 70 percent ofbotel employees are employed in service occupations These occupations generally provide lower salaries than positions requiring e CRAlCRA 3I 3 8 15 Employment Population Il1IIl Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR more training or education as indicated in Table 3 8 14 Average Income Range for Selected Employee Occupations TABLE 3 813 ESTIMATED NEW EMPLOYEE S BY JOB TYPE Job Type Percentage Estimated lob Type for Hotels New Hotel Motel Employees Managers Administration 6 7 1 213 Professionalrrechnical 2 5 453 Sales and Related 5 2 942 Clerical Support 15 2 2 753 Service Occupations 70 4 12 752 Total 100 0 18 113 Source Michael Brandman Associates 1994 based on Bureau of Labor Statistics 1989 Table 3 8 14 compares a statewide average income range for a number of occupations to the 1989 median gross rent for housing within the City of Anaheim The wage information is available from the Los Angeles Long Beach Metropolitan Area Wage Survey December 1989 and is published by the U S Bureau of Labor Statistics Additionally hourly wages for job types including cashiers sales clerks secretaries and cleanerslhousekeepers are available in the Annual Planning Information document ofthe Los Angeles Long Beach area published by the California Employment Development Department in June 1989 There are currently no wage data available from these sources for the managerial administrative job categories The number ofhousebolds associated with future employees in the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan area that would require some type of subsidized or affordable housing Le would have to pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing costs cannot be accurately predicted for a number of reasons First the exact distribution of occupations within the future developments cannot be determined because specific developments are not yet proposed Second future salary ranges for all occupations associated with future development projects is not known Third there is currently no method to predict housellold size from employee income data 01681 CRAlCJtA31 3 8 16 Emp oymenr Popularion and Housing e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR e TABLE 3814 AVERAGE INCOME RANGE FOR SELECTED EMPWYEE OCCUPATIONS Qwdifi u Overpaying Perceat of Individual Wage Job IncoRange Applied to Single Type Oeeupation AverageRent mer Two Wage prr Systems ADalyst 3 022 3 984 24 18 No No prr Computer Operator 1 845 2 344 39 30 Yes No prr Drafter 1 555 2 438 46 29 Yes No prr Electronics Technician 2 511 3 005 28 24 No No CIS Secretary 1 879 2 425 38 29 So No CIS Typist 1 334 1 758 53 41 Yes No CIS Receptionist 1 269 1 645 56 43 Y No SO Janitor Cleaner 779 1 181 91 60 Y So SO CleanerlHousekeeper 736 953 97 75 Y Y prr ProfionaI Technica1 CIS SO Service Oeeupation Based on average rent in ADabeim of 712 Based on Bureau of Ubor Statistics definition boUlehold overpays if more than 30 percent of mootbly income is IuiRd for haUling costs Two wage earner analysis oasumea similar occupatiOllll within houoehold Source Michael Brandman Aaoociates 1994 bued on Bureau of Ubor Statistics 1991 California Economic DeveloplDOllt Departmoat 1989 The estimated number of future employees likely to relocate into the City is presented byjob type in Table 3 8 IS The number of employees likely to relocate within each job category is based on the 13 3 percent of total future hotel motel employees as discussed above applied to the estimate percentage by employee type noted in Table 3 8 13 As indicated in Table 3 8 1S approximately 2 409 employees in all job categories are anticipated to move into the City Of these employees it is assumed that employees with managerial administration and professional technical jobs would not require housing assistance It CRAlCJlA JI 3 8 17 Emp oymml POpulmiOll and Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 815 EMPWYEES LIKELY TO REWCATE BY JOB TYPE New Employees Likely to Job Type Total New Employees Relocate Manager Administrative 1 213 162 Professionalrrechnical 453 60 Sales and Related 942 125 Clerical Support 2 753 366 Services Occupations u m U22 Total 18 113 2 409 Source Michael Brandman Associates 1992 based on Bureau of Labor Statistics 1989 This leaves an estimated balance of 2 187 employees in the lower salaried job categories likely to relocate to Anaheim who may require housing assistance or need affordable housing It is assumed that some of these employees will meet the criteria for subsidized or affordable housing needs as defined by HUD depending on the current salaries and rents and the number of wage earners within the household 3 83 MITIGATION MEASURES Existing City policies and the activities of the City of Anaheim Housing Authority provide for the housing needs of the City No additional mitigation measures are provided for because no significant impacts on the provision of necessary levels ofhousing are anticipated The City s housing needs for all income levels are accommodated through the programs and policies of the General Plan Housing Element which by law is reviewed and updated every S years based upon housing production targets set by SCAG The next programmed General Housing Element update is scheduled for July 1996 3 8 4 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS There will be no unavoidable adverse impacts of the project related to employment population and housing CRAlCJtA31 3 8 18 Employme1U Population and Housing 01683 e ---PAGE BREAK--- A1uJheim Reson Specific Plan E R e 3 9 PUBUC SERVICES AND UTILITIES This section contains analyses based on consultation with affected agencies on five technical reports Two of the technical reports incorporated by reference into this analysis relative to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR are The Disneyland Resort Utility Report prepared by Psomas and Associates 1992 and An Assessment of the Impacts of The Disneyland Resort Project on the Anaheim City Scbool District and the Anaheim Union Higb Scbool District prepared by Hamilton Rabinovitz Alscbuler Inc 1992 These reports bave been independently reviewed and evaluated by the City of Anaheim Relevant information from these reports is summarized in this section The reports are included as Technical Appendices I and J respectively in The Disneyland Resort Draft EIR Volume 5 This section of the EIR also incorporates data from the Draft Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Fiscal Analysis Technical Report prepared by Economic Planning Systems Inc 1993 In addition this section incorporates two recently completed utility reports wbieb encompass the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area the South central Area Sewer Deficiency Study and the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area Both ofthese reports wereprepared by the City of Anaheim Public Works Engineering Department 1993 and are summarized in the Wastewater Sewer Service and Storm Drain sections respectively of this EIR Where applicable the information contained in this Public Services and Utilities section of the report reflects information based on the final analysis presented in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical reports referenced above bas been updated verified andor validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR In practice public services are provided to a service area as a unit For example a fire station provides fire protection services to numerous facilities throughout a large service area The service areas for fire protection do not exactly matcl1 the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries Therefore the actual boUDdaries for each service and utility are described within each section Analyses of the cumu1ative effects of the proposed project and other reasonably foreseeable development in the area on public services and utilities are provided in Section 4 0 of this EIR CIlAICRA39 3 9 1 PubUc Servicu 01Id UtiUliu ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 9 1 FIRE PROTECTION 3 9 1 Environmental Conditions Fire Prevention The City of Anaheim Fire Department s fire prevention inspection and permit services are provided through the fire companies located in Fire Stations 3 and 6 and through the Department s Fire Prevention Division The Fire Prevention Division currently has one inspector to handle all trade shows in the Anaheim Reson and the Anaheim Stadium area Onehalf of an inspector s time is assigned to handle the inspection and permit service for the high rise hotels and miscellaneous assemblies education and institutional occupancies in the Anaheim Resort Hazardous materials disclosure and underground storage tank activities are also handled through the Fire Prevention Division Response Times The Anaheim Fire Department provides fire protection emergency medical response fire inspection and other services for the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area Two Anaheim fire stations provide primary service to the area Fire Station 6 located at 1330 South Euclid Street houses one four person paramedic engine and one four person fire engine company Itservices 40 percent of the project area The Station is planned to be reconstructed on its existing site which is approximately 0 5 acre in size to accommodate future anticipated growth within the Anaheim Reson It was originally scheduled for reconstruction in 1991 but has been postponed indefinitely due to lack of available funding The existing Station 6 will remain in operation while reconstruction occurs therefore no deficiencies in service are expected during reconstruction Fire Station 3 located at 1580 South Clementine Street is a battalion headquarters which houses a Suppression Batta1ion Chief a four person paramedic engine company and a four person truck company This fire station services approximately 60 percent ofthe Anaheim Resort Fire Station 3 is located within the 1 5 widening project acquisition zone and may be required to relocate within the next 5 years The City currently does not have a specific site identified for this relocation If Station 3 is required to move it is planned to be relocated within the triangular area bounded by Harbor Boulevard KateIla Avenue and 1 5 The relocated Station 3 would be operational prior to demolition of the existing facility If Station 3 is located within the triangular area there would be no substantial change ofexisting response times to locations within the Station s service area including the project area as a result of relocation However if the Station is located outside of the CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 2 Public Services and Utilities e o ---PAGE BREAK--- A1uJheim Resort Specific PliIn EIR e planned area impacts to response times could occur and additional environmental documentation would be necessary A future fire station is planned for the Anaheim Stadium Business Center area to serve planned high rise office and other commercial development The station is intended to house a four person paramedic engine company and a four person truck company Based on 1989 projected response times the station was originally scheduled to open in 1996 however current response time projections do not suppon the need for this opening date The Anaheim Fire Department will recommend the construction ofthe new station when demands for emergency service meet or exceed the Department s ahility to meet response time standards The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Area also receives fire protection services from Fire Station 7 located at 2222 East Ball Road which houses a four person paramedic company Fire Headquarters located at 500 E Broadway also provides emergency response services to the area Ithouses a four person paramedic engine company a four person fire engine company and four person squad truck company Anaheim Fire Department station locations equipment and personnel serving the project area are summarized in Table 3 9 1 TABLE 391 EXISl1NG FIRE STATION LOCATIONS EQUIPMENT AND STAFFING Fire Station I Location I Equipment r Personnel Fire Station 3 1580 S Oementine 1 paramedic engine company 9 Street 1 truck company 1 BaIta1ion Chief vehicle Fire Station 6 1330 S Euclid Street 1 paramedic engine company 8 1 standard engine company Fire Station 7 2222 E Ball Road 1 paramedic engine company 4 Fire Department 500 E Broadway 1 paramedic engine company 12 HeadquarterS 1 fire engine company 1 squad truck company Stations providing primary service to the project area Source Anaheim Fire Department 1992 verified 1994 e CIlAICRA39 3 93 PubUc Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The Anaheim Fire Department is a party to the Orange County Mutual Aid Agreement The Department has automatic aid agreements with all ofAnaheim s neighboring jurisdictions Additional fire and emergency medical response services are provided to the Anaheim Resort by the City of Garden Grove Fire Station 6 located at 12111 Chapman Avenue through an automatic aid agreement Exhibit 3 9 1 Anaheim Resort Fire Response Time Study Points shows the locations of the emergency vehicle response time study points in and around the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area which are addressed in Table 3 9 2 Distance and Response Time Current emergency vehicle response times and distances from the four Anaheim stations in the service area and Garden Grove Fire Station 6 to areas in and around the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are shown in Table 3 9 2 Distance and Response Time As can be seen in Table 3 9 2 the average time for first response in areas in proximity to the project area is approximately 2 minutes and 45 seconds Response time standards for the Anaheim Fire Department require first engine response within 5 minutes to 90 percent of all incidents and 8 minutes to the remaining 10 percent In addition the Department requires a maximum of 10 minutes for truck company response to 90 percent of all incidents Based on the equipment and staffmg listed in Table 3 9 1 Existing Fire Station Locations Equipment and Staffing current needs are being met Service CaJJ Responses Table 3 9 3 shows the number and type of Anaheim Fire Department service calls attributed to the existing Anaheim Resort in 1991 As seen in the table the majority of the service calls 61 percent were for emergency medical services According to the Anaheim Fire Department units from Fire Stations 3 and 6 responded to 1 901 calls for service in 1991 within the Anaheim Resort approximately 41 percent ofthese stations service call workload in 1991 Of this number approximately 674 calls were attributed to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 4 Public rvices and Utilities 01687 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e J Fire Station No 3 0 Anlllolm Fill 1 1 Legend I I I AaabcimR aon Bouocbry CRAlaSpc i6c I I PIaa Ala IX Emat ncY VdUdr Srudy Poin Laa J ur run9 NOTE Fire Sla ioD No 3 May Be Reloa 0IIngeMxld Avenut mil Micbad Brandm o AsJocWa 005500 0 6194 Exhibit 3 91 Anaheim Resort Fire Response Time Study Points Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 95 ---PAGE BREAK--- j ire Station No 3 SOUfe Anaheim Fir 1991 Legend Orangewood Avenue f Anaheim Raort Boundary Anaheim Raort Specific PI Am xl Emcri ncrVehidc 5IUdy PoinlS litTib J92 NOTE Fire Station No 3 May Be Relocated Exhibit 3 9 1 Anaheim Resort Fire Response Time Study Points Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 11m Midud Brandman Associms 005500 894 01689 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR e TABLE 39 DISTANCE AND RESPONSE TIME BY STATION Anaheim Anaheim Anaheim Anaheim Garden Grove Point Locatioll8 Station 3 Station 6 Headquarters Station 7 Station 6 1 Distance 1 12 19 2 1 N A Response Time 3 12 2 24 4 48 5 12 2 Distance 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 N A Response Time 3 36 3 00 5 12 5 36 3 Distance 0 5 2 3 2 4 2 6 N A Response Time 2 0 5 36 5 48 6 12 4 Distance 17 1 3 2 4 2 6 N A Response Time 4 24 2 36 5 48 6 12 5 Distance 1 8 1 2 6 2 8 N A Response Time 4 36 3 00 6 12 6 36 6 Distance 0 4 2 6 17 17 N A Response Time 1 48 6 12 3 24 4 24 7 Distance 0 7 2 3 2 2 14 Response Time 2 24 5 36 5 00 5 00 3 48 8 Distance 12 1 8 25 25 19 Response Time 3 24 4 36 6 00 6 00 4 48 9 Distance 15 1 S 2 8 2 8 2 2 Response Time 4 00 4 00 6 36 6 36 5 24 10 Distance 0 9 16 2 2 2 2 12 Response Time 2 48 4 12 5 24 5 24 3 24 Distance is liven in miles based on an aVer8jle drivinll speed of 30 mpb and a I minulll alarm reflex time Response time is given as minutes seconds Refer to Exhibit 3 9 1 for point loeatloDS Source Anaheim Fire Department Fire Prevention Division 1991 validated 1994 e 3 PubUc Strvicu and UdUtiu CltA CIlAJ9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR TABLE 3 93 ANAHEIM FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE CALLS ATIRIBUTABLE TO THE EXISTING ANAHEIM RESORT 1991 Type of Incident Year Total Medical Service Fire Calls 1991 644 89 190 Percent 61 34 5 100 Service calls include wire down electrical outlet smoking water vacuuming smoke from chimney no immediate hazard Of these C31ls 674 calls were attributed to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Medical 445 Service 205 Fire 24 Source Anaheim Fire Denartment 1994 Search and Rescue and Disaster Respome As part of their involvement with the California Office of Emergency Services DES the Anaheim Fire Department currently provides for light urban search and rescue services such as swift water rescue high angle building mountain etc rescue and other specialized searcb and rescue activities building collapse etc and has emergency medical services response capability However the Department has identified acitywide need for additional specialized equipment and supplies to provide an adequate response in the event of a major catastrophic disaster in the City particularly in the vicinity of the proposed project where there is typically a high population ofvisitors and employees Fire F10w The general required fire flow for buildings in the City of Anaheim is a minimum flow of two fire hydrants each flowing at I SOO to 2 000 gallons per minute gpm A minimal residual water pressure of 20 pounds per square inch psi must remain in the water system The adequacy of the existing water system and fire flow availability for the project area is discussed in Section 3 9 6 Water Service 01691 Public Servicu and Utilitiu CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 7 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Pion EIR e 3 9 1 Environmental Imoacts Fire Prevention With the proposed project fire prevention services provided by the City of Anaheim Fire Department will be continued in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The Anaheim Fire Department will continue to provide necessary fire prevention inspection fire permit bazardous materials disclosure and underground storage tank services particularly during future development project construction pbases In addition tradesbowscomplaints bazardous materials spills special events and business license inspections are some of the other types of fire prevention activities that will continue Inspections and plan cbeck services for new construction will increase The average production time in 1992 93 per inspector was 1 817 bours Based on these figures and bistorical experience the Anaheim Fire Department estimateS that one additional inspector and one plan checker will be needed to provide these services during the construction of future developments in the Anaheim Reso Specific Plan area Plan check fees will cover the costs of the plan check services Anaheim Fire Department Fire Marsbal 1994 To maintain adequate levels ofservice ofongoing fire inspection one additional fire inspector will be added by the City The additional fire inspector will be funded through tax proceeds associated with the anticipated incremental growth within the City In addition the Hazardous Materials Section of the Fire Department conducts annual inspections of all underground and aboveground storage tanks in the Specific Plan area as well as bazardous material disclosures and enforcement of statemandated regu1ations Rtspome Times Although the existing emergency vehicle response times for the project area are considered acceptable by the Anaheim Fire Department concern hasbeen expressed by its staff about the increased difficulty in naviglltini streelS especially in peak traffic times City ofAnaheim Fire Department Fire Marshal 1991b The proposed project will result in an increase in trip Jeoeration over current conditions However as the result ofroadway and intersection improvements that will be implemented as part of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and mitigation measures described in Section 10 Executive Summary Section 2 0 Project Description Section 3 3 Trausportation and Circulation and related area projects described in Section 4 0 Cumulative Analysis response times should improve on streets within and adjacent to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area e CRAICRA 3 9 3 9 8 PubUc Servicu and Utilitiu ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific P i1n EIR There would be no impact on response times even during construction of the new Station 3 as a result of the potential relocation of Fire Station 3 within the area bounded by Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and 1 5 The relocated Station 3 would be operational prior to demolition of the existing facility As noted previously this relocation is necessitated by Caltrans widening of 1 5 not by implementation of the proposed Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Service Call Responses The ability of the Anaheim Fire Department to adequately service the project area is dependent in part on the number of service caUs originating in the project area As previously discussed the Anaheim Reson generated 1 901 calls for service in 1991 Of the 1 901 service calls 674 calls were attributed to the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area For the purpose of calculating fire response demands of the proposed project the following assumption was made Based on 1991 responses for the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area 674 calls and the number ofexisting hotel rooms 11 190 rooms a generation rate of0 06 service caUs per room was calculated for the future hotel uses and associated hotel parking areas Using this assumption by year 2000 an additional 60 service calls are estimated to be gener aoJId year 2010 the total number of annual fire service calls anticipated to be generated in the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area is 1 650 which is a net increase of976 service calls 45 percent over 1991 levels Because of the higher degree of risk associated with mid to high rise hotels the increased number of visitors in the area and the potential for life and property loss the impact of the proposed project on fire protection services is considered significant by the Anaheim Fire Department and they anticipate that additional manpower equipment and facilities will be needed to serve the proposed project area and future development within the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area Fire personnel needed to accommodate the estimated increase in calls for fire protection services will be funded through taX proceeds associated with incremental growth within the City EPS 1993 Fire Station 3 is expected to be relocated because of the widening of 1 5 and Station 6 would be enlarged to accommodate the additional fire apparatus needed to service the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area Anaheim Fire Department Fire Marshal 1994 if the plan is implemented Precise staffing needs will be determined and implemented based upon the ultimate nature and phasing of developments within the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area as adjusted by factors such as 01693 CKAlCRA 3 9 3 9 9 Public Services and Utilities e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR e technological advances departmental scheduling assignment ofpersonnel and projected and areawide needs experienced in the future Search and Rescue and Disaster Response The proposed project will increase the concentration of mid to high rise hotel occupants and transient population in the project area Therefore implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will increase the existing need for additional capacity to provide emergency medical response services in the event of a major catastrophic event The Anaheim Fire Department has identified a need for two vehicles to serve the area a heavy search and rescue vehicle and a 1 000 patient medical triage vehicletrailer These specially configured vehicles outfitted with specialty tools equipment and supplies will provide the project area inhabitants an immediate major disaster level response capability Both these vehicles should be located in the immediate vicinity of the project area preferably at Fire Station 3 andor 6 3 9 13 MitillatioD Measures J Mitilation Measure 3 9 1 1 Prior to commencement of lI IIeturud framing OD each parcel or lot onsite fire hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner developer as required and approved by the Fire Department Mitiution M 3 9 1 1 Prior to approval of each Grading Plan the property owner developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to the Fire Department for review and approval to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department service requirements Miti atlon Measure 3 9 1 3 Prior to the issuance of each building permit plans shall indicate that all buildings exclusive of parlting struCtures shall have sprinklers installed by the property owner developer in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code Said sprinklers shall be installed prior to each finaJ building and zoning inspection M1tl tinn M 3 9 1 4 Prior to the issuance of each building permit plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards including a Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of access roads e 3 9 10 PubUc Servicu and UtiUtia CJlA CRA 3 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Replacement for noted paragraph on Page 3 9 11 The determination of the allocable share of costs attributable to the property owner developer sball be based on an apportionment of the costs ofsuch equipment facilities among property owners developers in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan Area the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area and theAnaheim ResortSpecific Plan Area or the otherwise dermed service area as applicable depending on the area served e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR b Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 75 000 pounds c All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers Water supplies are required at all entrances Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department d Adequate off sitepublic fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner developer The precise number types and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review Hydrants are to be a maximum of 400 feet apart e A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water system Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1 000 to 1 500 gpm Miti ation Measure 3 9 1 5 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit the property owner developer shall enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim to the satisfaction of the Fire Department and the City Attorney s office to payor cause to be paid their fair share of the funding to accommodate the following which will serve the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units additional manpower equipment and facilities A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability A medical triage vehicletrailer equipped with sufficient trauma dressings medical supplies stretchers etc to handle 1 000 injured persons and an appropriate storage facility oeo dd bfJ QrC 1t H 0 1 Or t Q e J r e 1 4 R dPI Jtaffitlg Reeds will he d ed aB8 iBlpl IBIBted liMed 1IpBR tile ulti b 88lUre af the t pbuiRg of fvtm de P nt UI iR me Len R 91t SpifiG Plan h9uRlIari a adjusteci by 0 DI W PAoflii faGtBn Jti h 8iGaI ad aneest d4p sehedsliBg 3Ad IilipRl8at af ft dlld cbA pr9j8 cud Ifbnid u l Il i u hl Pro r tuJ t l P Miti ation M 3 9 1 6he property owner developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department e Mitiution Measure 3 9 1 7 Prior to issuance ofeach building permit the property owner devel per wt ej flro J Ia shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan 144t d duilll 11UIl f accessibility of emergency fire equipment fire hydrant location and any other construction features 3 9 11 Public Servic and Uriliri CRAlCRA 3 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim ResorT Specific Plan ElR required by the Fire Marshal The property owner developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow er Mitintion Measure 3 9 1 8 Priorto approval of improvementi plans the water supply system shall be designed by the property owner developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection in accordance with Fire Department requirements 3 9 14 Sumificant Unavoidable Adverse Imoacts With implementation ofthe mitigation measures described above no significant unavoidable adverse impact on fire protection services is anticipated 3 9 2 POUCK SERVICES 3 9 2 1 Environmental Conditions The Anabeim Resort Specific Plan area is served by the Anaheim Police Department The Department currently has a total of 353 sworn personnel 171 non sworn personnel and 99 part time employees All of the Department s personnel except for officers from the Helicopter Detail operate from the Mark A Stephenson Police Station located at 425 S Harbor Boulevard approximately 3 4 mile north of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Helicopter operations He conducted from the Police Heliport located at 901 E Vermont Avenue To provide response to calls for service and patrol functions for the entire City 160 sworn personnel He assigned to the Patrol Division The remaining sworn personnel are assigned to support adivities throucbout the remaining three divisions of the Police Department The Anaheim Police Department bas more than 22 marked police units assicned to patrol the 48 7 square miles of the City at any liven time Also an average enforcement officers two K 9 units and ODe helicopter He available to support patrol officers on a daily basis The followinl additional police services He available Vebicle Collision Investigation Units Traffic Control Police Service RepreseutativeslReport Writers InvestigationlDetective Details Community Policing Procram Crime Task Force Detail Special Weapons and Tadics Details Gang Enforcement Detail CltAlClA 3 9 3 9 12 PubUc Services and Utilities 01697 1 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Neighborhood Watch Program C A N Hotel Crime Network D A R E Program For police protection purposes geographical areas of the City of Anaheim are divided into service areas of various sizes The City of Anaheim is divided into five sectors which are comprised of smaller units called Reporting Districts For each geographical area designated as a Reporting District data are kept by the Police Department as to the type and number of police service calls The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is included within Reporting Districts 1824 1825 1923 1924 1925 2023 2024 2025 2123 2124 2125 and 2126 However the borders of these Reporting Districts are not contiguous with those of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and therefore the Police Department used statistical sampling from all the reporting districts in the Specific Plan area Co C 6L counts taken In 1991 to WIth the boundaries of the Spectfic Plan area According to the Police Department typical crime problems in the project area are those associated with ahigh transient visitor population Response Statistics In 1993 the Anaheim Police Department responded to a total of 208 462 calls for service from throughout the City City ofAnaheim Police Department Planning and Research Unit 1994 A total of 8 008 calls were answered for service to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area during 1993 or an average of 22 calls per day An additional 1 527 calls for service were answered in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area bringing the total to 9 535 calls for service in the Anaheim Resort This figure represents approximately 4 6 percent of the 208 462 annual calls for service generated throughout the City in In 1993 the total calls for police service attributed to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area accounted for 84 percent of all calls requested in the Anaheim Resort The addition of police penonnel within the Anaheim Resort will be funded through annual tax proceeds and incremental growth in and around the Anaheim Resort EPS 1993 3 9 2 Environmental ftArtc Security Incidents Implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will indirectly increase the number of visitors and employees in the project area and surrounding area e CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 13 01698 Public Services and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Pion E1R The Anaheim Police Department estimates that the implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would create an increase in the number of cans for service associated with the area The number of service calls projected for the Year 2010 will double the current service level an increase of 20 calls per day in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The service calls include responses to thefts vehicle burglaries damage to vehicles traffic related incidents and crimes against persons For an estimate of calls associated with the botel motel uses the Police Department assumed fun development ofthe a1lowahle uses and assumed that all uses would operate at fun capacity As noted in Section 3 9 2 1 petite penoUoLl l dOOd 4 h aeee eElaee the ti lluird iBS tU9 in IIt dditional police protection service will be funded througb tax proceeds associated with anticipated incrementa growth within the Anaheim Resort EPS 1993 3 9 23 Mitintion M 7 r s1 t iY l 1 IJ 3 j l 2 3 l j 3 No Ilht 6Gt v easures are ubcd 1 d Iwl G loI o I o 3 9 2 4 SiPftiflrJInt Unavoidable Adverse Imn L X ti tt f at OW uM t scl sc t i U A o cJ 0si ficant adverse impact on police protection services is anticipated from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan 3 93 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE 3 93 1 Enriro ta1 Regional Settio The City ofAnaheim Deputment of Mainten recently developed a Solid Waste Management Plan to comply with the California IDtegrated Waste ManagemeDt Act of 1989 CaI Health and Safety Code 4 000 This law requites cities and counties within California to reduce waste generation by a minimum of 2S percent by 1995 and SO percent by the year 2000 through a combination of solid waste management source reductioo recycling composting and market development Conectioo and recycling programs are curreutIy uod way in the raideotial areas of the City and are proposed for commercial area in the future Recycle Anaheim is a program administered by Anaheim Disposal Iocorporated and bas been implemeoted 00 a otnry basis for singlefamily raideoces ooly Commercial retaiI and industrial uses also participate in this program 00 a voluntary basis CRAlCItA39 3 914 PubUc Servicu and UtiUtiu 01699 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- I I e e r 1 Insert for Page 3 9 14 new mitigation measures Mitiszation Measure 3 9 21 Prior to approval of each final site plan and issuance of each building permit the property owner developer sha1I submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval for the purpose ofincorporating safety measures in theproject design including theconcept ofcrime prevention through environmental design eg building design circulation site planniDg and lighting of parking structures and parking areas Mitiszation Measure 3 9 2 2 Prior to issuance ofeach building permit for a parking structure the property owner developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit television monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department Said measures shall be implemented prior to linal building and zoning inspections Mili2ation Measure 3 9 2 3 Ongoing during project operation the property owner developer sha1I provide private security on the premises to maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to review and approval ofthe Police Department The use of security patrols and electronic security devices ie video monitors should be considered to reduce the potential for criminal activity in the area Miti2ation Measure 3 9 2 4 Prior to issuance of each building permit the project design shall include parking lots and parking structures with controUed access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police Department and sha1I be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR All of the solid waste generated in Anaheim is currently disposed of at the OlindaOlinda Alpha Landfill located in unincorporated Orange County and within the City of Brea s Sphere ofInfluence which is permitted to receive 8 000 tons of solid waste per day excluding asphalt or soil Grauer pers conun In 1987 the Orange County Board ofSupervisors authorized atwo phase process to identify sites for additional Class ill nonhazardous solid waste disposal capacity and future integrated waste management facilities for north Orange County The Phase I NOCLATS report was completed in 1989 This study involved the identification and comparative evaluation of 16 candidate landfill sites in north Orange County and four alternative waste management technologies Information presented in the Phase I report resulted in the selection by the Board of Supervisors of four primary sites and two alternative technologies which were assessed in the EIR prepared for the NOCLATS report On March 10 1992 the Orange County Board of Supervisors certified the Final EIR for the North Orange County Landfill and Alternative Technologies Study NOCLATS project and approved the expansion of the OlindaOlinda Alpha Landfill This landfill site is projected to remain in operation until the year 2013 Local SettiDl Solid waste generated by existing uses within the Anaheim Resort area is collected and disposed of by Anaheim Disposal Incorporated which serves the City of Anaheim As shown in Table 3 9 4 Existing Projected Solid Waste Generation approximately 4 028 tons of solid waste is currently generated annUally id Specific Plan area This is equivalent to approximately II tons of solid Ii waste per day which represents approximately percent of the daily permitted capacity at the OlindaOlinda Alpha landfill 3 9 32 Environmental Imoads Construction of the future development projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will involve site preparation activities and demolition which will generate waste materials Hauling and disposal of these materials will occur during the construction process of individual development projects located within the Specific Plan area Following completion and occupancy of the development projects within the Specific Plan area refuse will be regularly generated As indicated in Table 3 9 4 the future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are estimated to generate an additional 29 373 tons annually or a net increase of 805 tons per day which constitutes approximate1y 10 percent of the current daily permitted capacity of the expanded OlindaOlinda Alpha Landfill 01701 CRAlCIlA 3 9 3 9 IS Public Services and Utilities e e ---PAGE BREAK--- AnIlheim Resort specific Plan EIR e TABLE 3 9 4 SOLID WASTE GENERATION YEAR 2010 Solid Waste Load Generation Component Area sq ft Ibs TonslYear 16 318 hotel roomsb 7 832 640 1 2 4 700 Restaurant 979 OSO 48 6 23 792 Retail 979 080 1 8 881 Project Net Increase Subtotal 29 373 Existing II 190 6 714 000 12 4 028 Hotel Rooms Year 2010 Total 33 401 Total Average Daily Generation 2010 915 tons day Psomas Associates 1992 b Assumes 600 square feet per room per City of Anaheim 2 94 Assumes approximately 20 percent of the total hotel motel room square footage may be devoted to accessory uses 10 percent retail 10 percent restaurantSO percent rooms Average day is annual demand365 Source MBA 1994 The waste generated by the proposed project would represent a small percentage of the remaining capacity at the expanded OlindaOlinda Alpha Landfill However because ofthe limited capacity of the landfill the project s impacts are significant However individual development projects will be required to comply with AS 939 which stipulates thatsolid waste be reduced by 2S percent by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000 Implementation of the City s Solid Waste Management Plan and mitigation measurea included herein will help extend the lifeof landfills and substantially reduce the impact of future developmem projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Solid waste will be collected and disposed ofby Anaheim Dispoaal Incorporated or other contracton designated by the City at the appropriate landfill sites I Refer to Section 3 11 Hazardous Materials for discussion relative to disposal ofhazardous materials e 3 916 PllbUc Services and UdUties CRAlCIlA 3 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 9 3 3 Mitilation Measures Mitilation Measure 3 9 3 1 Prior to issuance of building permits the property owner developer shall submit project plans to the Maintenance Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939 the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 as administered by the City of Anaheim and the County ofOrange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans Prior to final building and g ad inspections implementation ofsaid plan shall commence and shall remain in full effect as required by the Maintenance Department Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation include but are not limited to a Detailing the locations and design of on site recycling facilities b Providing on site recycling receptacles tOfncourage recycling c Complying with all Federal State rtgijla ions lIAd City for hazardous material disposal d Panicipating in the City of Anaheim s Recycle Anaheim program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 AB 939 the property owner developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs as required by the Maintenance Department including but not limited to Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins Facilitating cardboard recycling especially in retail areas by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing Facilitating glass recycling especially from restaurants by providing adequate space for sorting and storing Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection idillg sa silil r ecyclial Tt I aeccuibk tv m pUOJk W u Uulage poqrr1ing fn llln18iB88MlS cm IO A AIled h kG hl e e Prohibiting curbside piclc up r UOJ 1i hazardulD 1U4l5 d d tcd oUw IIR With Sl 4u aud City rcgulaticDS CRAlCRA J 9 3 9 17 01703 Public rvices and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 r Anaheim son Specific Plan E1R Ie Miti ation Measure 3 9 32 On going during project operations the following practices shall be implemented as feasible by the property owner developer Usage of recycled paper products for stationery letterhead and packaging Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard Collection of office paper for recycling Collection of foam cups for recycling Collection of glass plastics kitchen grease laser printer toner cartridges oil batteries and scrap metal for recycling or recovery A t6J atien AI uN 3 9 3 J Faiva IoU appruval uf 5aadi u5 pliW CVI io aujQ L I requhw5 iW Ift lp IfPYp9A Pl and pfier te is 111ft f of fmQlitiQD peRRit fer Pl the ty OWR8fEl8 el6 cdl Ub LfwulidvLI aud buyv tfEJtISA Plw 1 A At ft linM tn qec uary lty tile W ksf ueparonem nafltt n5ha liu5 nlvl lun and or Mdh QepBRIB Bt The 811111 d ub uLl vf vff 11 CI wt fv ial I eft ti tllt pwjOGt 8Bd pt dS CVI d vu cd UI excess milLc llal Tbc sc upcIuWJ way ludt 1dinll3f ntTrials 8BSiucd LV il bro er or CODUdLWl d16 4 prejeet is dlt uitiRitr or V POR to III t 1 I1M IgrvH ll witII BKempts LLlad IoU lDUve It OlilUl cufttj All prnp rty o a tIveloper IlhalI offer re yclahle huildinr I 1I h II upbalt or OO 4l fnr ulp pr ums 8I h p cm fJ AAA iI 5 Hittie l18fteies far UOIhu odiuu ul o er pruJ if uUl all elB be rII IlGfI It on thf Gihl 3 93 4 Unayoi hl Adverse II Implementation of the mitigation measures is anticipated to substantially reduce the amount of solid waste produced by the project however ofthe limited landfill capacity the impact to landfill capacity is expected to remain significant 3 9 4 PARD Section 3 1 Land UseRelated Pl and Policies and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Appeodix B provide a discussion of the project s implementation of the Pub Recteation and Community Services Element goals and policies set forth in the Anaheim General Plan e 3 918 Publk Services and Utilitiu CRAlCIlA 3 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Pkm ElR 3 9 4 1 Environmental Conditions The Anaheim Parks Recreation and Community Services Depanment the Department maintains six parks within a 3 mile radius ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area for public recreational uses These parks and their size facilities and programs are summarized in Table 3 9 5 City Parks and Facilities In 1992 the Department expanded Boysen Park located approximately 2 5 miles northeast of the Specific Plan area by the development of an additional 5 acres The expansion includes a youth soccer field one parking lot play equipment and picnic facilities There are no other programmed expansion plans for parks and recreational facilities within a 3 mile radius of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The City recently adopted the Parks Recreation and Community Service Element of the City s General Plan GPA 325 which identifies park acreage and facility deficiencies Within the West Anaheim planning area which includes the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area there are nine neighborhood parks and four community parks that total 174 2 acres in size The City attempts to maintain a ratio of 2 acres ofparkland per 1 000 population however the actual ratio is much lower in West Anaheim than the preferred ratio Based upon this standard the population in the year 1990 generated a demand for 189 9 acres of parkland The estimated parkland demand in the year 20I0 is 220 4 acres West Anaheim presently has only 174 2 acres of local parkland thus even with the additional 5 5 acres of additional park development associated with Boysen Park there is a parkland deficit of 15 7 acres This deficit will increase to 46 2 acres by the year 2010 Anaheim Parks Recreation and Community Service Element 1992 Additionally the demand for the use of ballfields is greater than the availability at peak usage periods According to the Depanment the six parks listed in Table 3 9 5 their facilities and their programs are used as designed and are used to capacity 3 9 4 2 Environmental Imoads No increased deficit in City parklands beyond the 46 2 acres in West Anaheim that are already projected for the year 2010 will result from implemenwion of the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan Therefore no direct impacts on park recreation and community facilities and services would occur CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 19 Public Services and Utilities 01705 e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan E1R TABLE 3 95 CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES ParI LocaIion Size Facilities StoddaJd ParI 9th Street south of Katella 9 4 acres play equipment Ave softball field soccer field overlay picnic facilities restrooms pu tina Ponderosa ParI Hoster St and Orangewood 9 0 acres neiahborhood center Ave buketball court handball courts play equipment picnic facilities volleyball court Iiahted softball field restrooms parI ina Audre Plaza ParI Audre west of Walnut St O S acre play equipment buketball courts neiahborhoocl center Palm Lane ParI PaIai St north of CerriIo8 7 0 ICreI play equipment Ave softball field soccer field overlay picnic facilitieo BoyParI State Collep Blvd north 212 ICreI 12 tamiJ courta ofKateUa Ave teaDi center privately operated play equipment volleyball courts one Iiahted softball field soccer overlay pu tina one DOIl Iip ted softball field soccer overlay e8b00lDl youth soccer field picuic facilitieo Modjeob ParI Nulwood St nortb of 24 0 ICreI play equipment Katella Avo picuic sbeltera picaicfacilitieo Iip ted softball field with soccer overlay pu tina cricbt field SourI eADabeim Pub RecroaticD aDd CommuIIity Serviceo Deputment January 1993 va1idated in January 1994 e CRAlCllA 3 9 3 9 20 PubUc Servicu and Utililies ---PAGE BREAK--- ATUJheim Reson Specific Plan EIR A substantial area within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area has been designed to encourage use by pedestrians in a park like setting As detailed in Section 3 11 2 2 Design Plan pedestrian amenities including landscaped walkways street furniture and lighting will promote a recreational theme and may indirectly create increased recreational opponunities Development of amenities associated with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are expected to be an improvement over existing Anaheim Resort recreational conditions therefore a beneficial impact would occur 3 9 4 3 Mitilation Measure As there will be no negative impact to parks created by approval of the Specific Plan or by development within the Specific Plan boundaries no mitigation measures are required 3 9 4 4 Silmificant Unavoidable Adverse Imoacts No significant unavoidable adverse impact on park and recreational resources is anticipated 3 9 5 SCHOO The school impact analysis was based primarily on An Assessment ofthe Impacts ofThe Disneyland Resort on the Anaheim City School District and the Anaheim Union High School District HR A 1992 Appendix J of The Disneyland Resort Draft EIR Volume 5 This report has been independently reviewed and evaluated by the City of Anaheim and is incorporated by reference into this EIR The City also has reviewed and analyzed additional information provided by the school districts including I The Comprehensive Study of the Impact of Development on the School Districts and Fee Program Justification Fee Program Justification Report March 1992 prepared by Recht Hausrath Associates RH A required as a condition to collection of statutory developer fees 2 An Analysis of the Impacts to Anaheim City School DistrictAnaheim Union High School District Caused by the Proposed Disneyland Resort Specific Plan prepared by RH A hut later withdrawn by the district 3 The Critique of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report and Analysis of Impact on Anaheim City School District 4 Development Fee Justification Analysis for Residential Development Commercial Industrial Developmeot and Senior Housing prepared for the Anaheim City School District April 1993 and prepared by School Planning Services CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 21 Public Services and Utilities e e 01707 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ie Anaheim Resort Spedfic Plan EIR Where applicable the information contained in this section of the report reflects information based on the finaJ analysis presented in The Disneyland Resort Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical report s referenced above has been updated verified and or validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation ofthis EIR The DEIR does not explicitly discuss the project s impacts on any school district other than the Anaheim City School District ACSD and Anaheim Union High School District AUHSD because I There is no potential for direct project impacts because the project does not include any new residential development Additionally each school district may restrict the number of inter district transfers employees who enroll their children near their place of employment to conform with available student seating capacity 2 Under applicable state law any potential indirect impacts that may occur as a result of project generated employees relocating to new housing units within other school districts would be mitigated through the imposition ofdeveloper fees oncoostructiOlt of such new housing units 3 Estimates ofindirect impacts ofproject generated employees whorelocate to existing housing uoits within other school districts are speculative at best and therefore cannot be reasonably analyzed in this EIR 4 Based on the estimated distribution of project generated employee households throughout the study area as described in this analysis and the size and location of the school district it is reasonable to predict that the impact of project generated employee households relocating to within the boundaries of the district will be negligible S Each school district outside the ACSD and AUHSD area will receive school fees from any new resideotial units that may be constructed within that district boundaries The metbodololY used to calculale the potential impacts ofthe proposed project on the emollment and capacities of these two school districts is explained in this section of the EIR After a thorough evaluation the City of Anaheim bas detennined that the analysis presented in this section of the EIR is a reasonable analysis wbich is by realistic assumptions and metbodololY Cumulative impacts related to schools are addressed in Section 4 0 of this EIR e CIlA CIIA 3 9 3 922 Public Services 01Id Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 9 5 1 Environmental Conditions The project area is located within the jurisdictions of the Anaheim Union High School District and the Anaheim City School District The Anaheim Union High School District AUHSD provides grades 7 12 and adult education for much of the cities of Anaheim Buena Park and Cypress portions of the cities of La Palma Stanton Garden Grove Fullerton Los Alamitos and Orange as well as various areas of unincorporated Orange County AUHSD operates eight junior high schools eight high schools three continuation high schools and a special education school The cities of Anaheim Buena Park and Cypress are roughly approximate AUHSD boundaries Kindergarten through 6th grade students in the vicinity ofthe project area are served by the Anaheim City School District The Anaheim City School District ACSD encompasses an area within but not coterminous with the City of Anaheim ACSD has 21 kindergarten through 6th grade elementary schools The City of Anaheim s boundaries roughly approximate the boundary ofthe ACSD for the purposes of analysis ofimpacts because the district encompasses all of the City of Anaheim and only small portions of the cities of Orange and Garden Grove Anaheim Union High School District Current Enrollment According to California Basic Education Data System CBEDS information provided by the district for the preparation of this EIR the total enrollment for the 1992 93 school year in 7th 12th grades in AUHSD was 24 770 students Of this number 8 001 are junior high students enrolled in grades 7 8 and 15 069 are senior high students in grades 9 12 AUHSD continuation schools special education programs alternative education and independent study programs account for an additional 2 825 students Thus the entire enrollment in the AUHSD in the 1992 93 school year was 27 595 students The project is located within the Loara High School Ball Junior High School attendance area and also borders on the Katella High School South Junior High School attendance area to the east and the Anaheim High School Sycamore Junior High School attendance area to the north For the purpose of this EIR analysis the district provided the estimated 1992 93 enrollment in the AUHSD which serves the project area broken down by school shown in Table 3 9 01709 CIlAICIlA 3 9 3 9 23 Public rvices and Utilities e e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Pion EIR TABLE 3 9 6 FSTIMATED ENROLLMENT IN GRADE 7 12 SCHOOLS IN THE PROJECT VICINITY 199293 SCHOOL YEAR School Complex T Enrollment Loara High School 1 802 Ball Jr High School ill Suhtotal 2 917 Katella High School 1 707 South Jr High School W Subtotal 2 790 Anaheim High School 1 975 Sycamore Junior High School Subtotal 3 241 All Six Schools Senior High 5 484 Junior High 3l Total 8 948 Source AUHSD 1993 Student Generation Ihr Based on an AUHSD estimate of 106 750 dwelling units within its boundaries in 1992 the AUHSD student generation rate is 0 217 students in grades 7 12 per dwelling unit 0 075 junior high students per dwelling unit and 0 14 senior high students per dwelliq unit Other miscellaneoUll AUHSD programs generate students at a rate of0 026 students per household These relationships are shown in Table 3 9 7 Student Generation Rates for the Anaheim Union High School District 1992 93 School Year Future AUHSD EnrolJ Multiplyiq the AUHSD s projected increase in households within the AUHSD boundaries by the current 1991 92 student poeration rate produces the future enrollment estimates for the years 2000 and 2010 shown in Table 3 9 8 e 1993 Occupied dwelliq count wu not available durinc the preparation of this school analysis ThUll occupied dwelliq unit numbers from 1992 are used The use of 1992 dwelliq unit number results in a marginally higher number of students 3 9 24 PubUc krvicu and UriUries CRAlCRA J 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 17 STUDENT GENERATION RATES FOR THE ANAHEIM UNION IUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 199293 SCHOOL YEAR Junior Senior High High Total Total Grades Grades Grades Other All 7 8 9 12 7 12 Programs AUHSD 1992 93 Enrollment 8101 15069 23170 2825 25 995 1992 Dwellin Units 1 06 750 106 750 106 750 106 750 106 750 Student Generation Rate enrollment divided by dwelling units 0 75 0 14 0 217 0 026 0 244 Includes continuation high school and other miscellaneous programs but not adult education Source AUHSD 1992 1993 HRA 1992 TABLE 3 1 8 FUTURE AUHSD ENROU MENT BASED ON 1991 92 STUDENT GENERATION RATES Total Student Estimated Year Housing Units Generation Rate Enrollment 1991 1992 106 750 0 244 26 047 20001200 l 112 450 0 244 27 438 201012011 120 250 0 244 29 341 Projections of total housing units are based on unpublished year by year projections prepared for the AUHSD Fee Program Justification Report AUHSD did not provide updated projections for 1992 1993 total housing units Includes continuation high school and other miscellaneous programs but not adult education This projection assumes that these programs maintain their respective 1992 1993 proportion of total enrollments Source AUHSD 1993 01711 Cl AJCIlA 3 9 3 9 25 Public Services and Utilities e ---PAGE BREAK--- r Anaheim Reson Specific Pion E R However it should be noted that in its study AUHSD uses a cohort enrollment model which projects year by year grade level by grade level enrollment generated by existing housing and projected new housing between the 1991 92 and 20102011 school years The analysis using the cohort enrollment model is based on certain planning assumptions including the following An increase of 5 700 new housing units by the year 2000 and 13 500 new units by 2010 A combination of demographic trends will result in a corninuation of the current birth rate until the 20002001 school year then a decline at the same rate it increased over the 19805 until the 20062007 school year and then to remain flat over the final 5 years of the projection period Continuation high school special education alternative education and independent study programs will maintain their respective 1992 1993 proportions of total enrollment Based on this enrollment model AUHSD estimates that total enrollment will reach about 37 000 by the year 2000200I and about 40 000 students by 201020II AUHSD Qassroom Seatin Canacil AUHSD seating capacity is an estimate of the amourn ofclassroom space available to house students and is expressed in terms of Average Daily Attendance ADA per teaching station The ADA standards are fixed on a stateWide basis and do not leCel lari1y conform to the maximum class size reflected in local school district policies or classroom teacher agreements Each individual schools seating capacity is the sum of these calculations for each respective teacher wort station Total AUHSD seating capacity is equal to the sum of tbe seatin capacities for each AUHSD school All AUHSD schools cum ntly operate on a single tract two semester or traditional school year schedule AJaumin a sin 1Hract twCl S t er capacity there are 16 104 senior high school seats grades 912 and 10 604 junior high school seats grades 7 8 for a total of 26 708 seats in the AUHSD as a whole not inc1udin tbe continuation high schools the special education school or administrative rooms within individual schools These capacity fipres differ from those provided by the AUHSD however they are substantiated by statewide standards Relationshio of AUHSD llt and Canaciey For the junior high senior high campuses closest to tbe project site tbe 1992 93 school year enrollment capacity situation is illustrated in Table 3 99 Enrollment VI Capacity at Six AUHSD CRAlCRA 3 9 3 926 PubUc Services and UriUrtu ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plml EIR Schools in the Project Vicinity Overall these six schools are currently operating at about 98 percent of capacity A comparison between projected junior high and senior high enrollment demand and the above supply estimate of single track seating capacity is shown in Table 3 9 10 Future Enrollment vs Capacity Anaheim Union High School District TABLE 3 99 ENROLLMENT VS CAPACITY AT SIX AUIISD SCHOOLS IN TIlE PROJECT VICINITY 199293 SCHOOL YEAR School I 1992 93 Loara Sr High Capacity 1 969 Enrollment l W Difference 167 Ball Jr High Capacity 1 120 Enrollment 1 J lj Difference 5 Katella Sr High Capacity 1 687 Enrollment 1l Z Difference 20 South Jr High Capacity 985 Enrollment l W Difference 98 Anaheim Sr High Capacity 2 146 Enrollment l ill Difference 171 Sycamore Jr High Capacity 1 154 Enrollment 1 ll6 Difference n TOTAL Capacity 9 061 Enrollment J 2ll8 Difference 153 Source AUHSD 1993 01713 CRAlCRA J 9 3 9 27 Public Services and Uriliries e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 A1u1heim Reson Specific Pion EIR e TABLE 3 910 FUnJRE ENROLLMENT VS CAPACITY ANAHEIM UNION mGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991 92 200200I 20102011 Capacity Junior High 10 604 10 604 10 604 Senior High Total 26 708 26 708 26 708 Enrollment Junior High 7 528 11 091 10 514 Senior High l2 ill Total 21 758 30 419 32 859 Surplus Deficit Junior High 3 076 487 90 Senior High UM J 224 6 241 Total 4 950 3 711 6 151 Source HR A 1992 AUHSD projections ofjunior high school enrollment indicate that in the school year 200200I 10 616 students will live in existing residential developments and 475 students will live in housing developed after 1992 Thus the existing capacity for 10 604 students will be used by students from existing housing and about 17 additional singletrack classrooms would be needed for the remaining 487 students However based on the previously described coban enrollment model by the school year 20102011 the junior high age school enrollment will decline and a small surplus ofspace may again become available at that time At the senior high level AUHSD projections for 20002001 indicate that 18 532 students will live in existing res and 796 students will live in post l992 resideotial development In this case AUHSD will be shon by about 2 428 seats to accommodate students from existing development and will have to operate some schools year round add portable classrooms construct new space ie about 121 complete high schools operating on a single track traditional school year calendar or additions to existing schools or some combination of these strategies None of these strategies will be fino from new development fees All of the senior high students generated by new developlllelll in the 2002001 school year will also have to be in some type of new space By 20102011 according to the AUHSD projection the need for additional seating capacity will increase further e C1WCRA 3 9 3 9 28 Pubic Suvtcu and UdUtiu ---PAGE BREAK--- AlUlheim Reson Specific Plan EIR AUHSD Inter district Transfers State law permits a school district to consider applications to enroll children who reside outside the district ifthe parent or guardian is employed withinthe boundaries ofthe district California Education Code Section 48204 For the AUHSD the inter district transfer program applies only to junior high school students grades 7 and 8 and not to senior high school students Sending and receiving school districts may refuse inter district transfers if the requested transfer would negatively impact a district s desegregation plan or that the additional cost of educating apupil would exceed the amount of additional state aid received as a result of the transfer Over the last 4 years there has been a substantial decline in the number of AUHSD inter district transfers among both those entering the district and those leaving the district In 1991 92 the district had a marginal increase in the number of students entering the district than the past three years but overall had a negative net exchange in that it lost 106 more students than it gained These relationships are shown below in Table 3 9 11 Inter district Transfers to and from the AUHSD Inter district transfers per state law are not allowed for grades 9 12 TABLE 3 911 INTER DISTIUCT TRANSFERS TO AND FROM TIlE ANAHEIM UNION IUGH SCHOOL DISTIUCT 1988 89 TO 1 91 Transfers Transfers Net Year In Out Oumge 1988 89 610 [PHONE REDACTED] 90 396 266 130 199091 191 203 12 1991 92 243 349 106 Source AUHSD 1993 Anaheim City School District Current Enrollment For the purpose of this EIR analysis the district provided 1992 93 enrollment figures for the schools located within the vicinity of the Anabeim Reson Specific Plan During the 1992 93 school year CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 29 Public Services and Utilities el I I ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific PlmI EIR e there were 16 308 students enrolled in ACSD schools including special education students The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is located within the Stoddard School attendance area and is adjacent to the Ross Palm Lane and Revere schools attendance areas The enrollment situation at these schools is summarized below in Table 3 9 12 Current Enrollment at ACSD Schools in the Project Vicinity TABLE 3 912 CURRENT ENROLLMENT AT ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISI RICT SCHOOLS IN THE PROJECT VICINlTV l 9293 Elementary 1992 1993 Sdlool Enrollmeut Palm Lane 898 Revere 881 Ross 519 Stoddard 905 Total 3 203 Source ACSD 1993 Nine ACSD schools including Stoddard Palm Laue lIJId Revere currently operate year round on a four track 6020 program Under a 6020 plan the school year is divided into three 6O day instructional periods lIJId three2O day vacation periods Each pupil thua has 3 months of instruction followed by 1 month of vacation With a four track 6020 plan like that used in ACSD schools building seating capacity is increased by 33 pen ent Three additional schools wereplaced on year round calendan in the 1992 1993 school year For purposes of analysis it is assumed that these additional schools will operate on the same 6020 plan currently used by nine schools in the district Student mOil Rate The student geueration rate provides an estimate ofthe average number ofchildren enrolled in ACSD per housellold within the district boundaries The student generation factor used in the District s Developer Fee Justification Study was prepared uaing a commonly accepted estimation lIlchnique which uses census ttactbased information to approximate the boundaries ofthe district The study bas been officially adopted by the district lIJId e 3 930 Public Suvlces and Utilities CRAlCIlA 3 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ErR it was independently verified by the preparers of the EIR Scbools Analysis While it is true that district boundaries do not exactly match the census tract boundaries used by the district s consultant in making the student generation factor calculation for the Fee Justification Study the district and the City have determined that the census tract boundaries serve as a reasonable proxy for the district Although ACSD previously prepared an estimate of the number of 1991 92 dwelling units within the districts boundaries the district does not have 1992 93 estimates available for use in this EIR Thus the 1992 93 dwelling unit estimate used in this analysis was obtained by the City of Anaheim from the Orange County Environmental Management Agency EMA Orange County Projections for 1992 OCP 92 OCP 92 estimated an average of 325 dwelling units year through the year 2000 with most of the projected growth occurring after 1995 see Table l3a The aelUaI number of building permits issued between 1990 and the first quaner of 1994 however is substantially fewer than the OCP 92 estimates for the year 2000 Subtracting the difference between the average of 325 units per year and the factual numbers of residential building permits issued between 1990 and 1994 the OCP 92 year 2000 estimate would be reduced by approximately 808 units Additionally approximately 4 percent of the building permits issued during this period did not complete construction This equates to an additional reduction of 32 units or a total of 840 units less than projected for the year 2000 It has been estimated by the City that through year 2000 housing growth within the City of Anaheim will be less than that projected by OCEMA Thus the OCP 92 estimate of 53 959 dwelling units may be too high when compared to actual building activity OCP 92 is anticipated to be revised in 1996 at which time housing and employment estimates are most likely to be reduced to reflect conditions associated with the lingering recession For the years 2000 and 2010 ACSD used two projection methods SPS I which is based on the continuation of the number of housing units constructed from 19801990 and SPS 2 wbich is based on the continuation of the rate of housing growth from 1980 1990 SPS I yielded 322 units year which is almost identical to OCP 92 in the long term SPS 2 yielded 372 units year which accounts for the higher range in projections for the years 2000 and 2010 By using the timeframe between 19801990 the projections by ACSD are relatively high since that timeframe was considered a boom period for both Anaheim and Southern California As demonstrated by actual resideotial building permit numbers the housing growth of the first four years of the nineties are substantially lower then the housing growth that occurred in the eighties Assuming that Anaheim recovers from the recession in the near term growth is not anticipated to approach the building activity of the late eighties Given the comparisons between the districts projections and OCP 92 as noted above the City of Anaheim determined that the OCP 92 projectiOns more accurately reflects the estimate of the number CRAlCRA J 9 3 9 31 Public Services arul Utilities 01717 e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR of new dwelling units anticipated to be constructed within the district s boundaries by the year 2010 As such OCP 92 estimates wereused in this analysis to determine the overall student generation rate Dividing ACSD s 1992 93 total enrollment by OCP 92 s estimate of 52 090 housing units located within the district in 1992 93 yields an overall student generation r of0 313 student per household as shown in Table 3 9 13b Estimated Student Generation Rates for the Anaheim City School District 1992 93 TABLE 3 913 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS WITIDN ACSD SCHOOL DISTRICf BOUNDARIES Year Year Year Year Dwelling Units 1991 92 1992 93 2000 2010 ACSD Estimate 51 780 oa 53 657 55 853 56 877 72 173 OCP 92 oa 52 090 54 767 57 970 Source ACSD 1993 City of Anabeim 1994 TABLE 3 913b ESTIMATED STUDENT GENERATION RATPS FOR THE ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICf tm 93SCHOOL YEAR TOlal Grades K1 1992 93 Enrollment 16 304 Occupied Dwellinl Units 52 090 Studeot GeDeration Rate 0 313 OCP 92 Projections Total K6 enrollment divided by occ upied dwellinl units Soun e ACSD 1993 City of Anaheim 1994 e 3 932 PubUc Servicu and Utilities CIlAICRA 3 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Future ACSD Enrollment One method for projecting future enrollment is to multiply the projected increase in households within the ACSD boundaries by the current 1992 93 student generation rate This produces the future enrollment estimates for the years 2000 and 2010 in Table 3 9 14 Future ACSD Enrollment Based on 1992 93 Student Generation Rates TABLE 3 914 FUTURE ACSD ENROLLMENT BASED ON 199293 STUDENT GENERATION RATES Year Total Housing Units Estimated Enrollment Student Generation Rate 1992 1993 2000 200I 2010 2011 0 313 0 313 0 313 16 304 17 142 18 145 52 090 54 767 57 970 The 1993 Facilities Master Plan for ACSD indicates a 5 percent vacancy rate in the ACSD boundary whereas the Anaheim Department of Finance DOF showed the entire City of Anaheim at 6 14 percent vacancy rate for 1993 Applying the DOF vacancy factor to the number of dwelling units would reduce the number of students generated by over I percent since the population would be less than projected by ACSD Source ACSD City of Anaheim 1994 ACSD uses a cohort enrollment model which projects year by year grade level by grade level enrollment generated by existing housing and projected new housing between the 1992 93 and 2010 2011 school years This approach yields approximately 1 000 more students in 1995 96 than ACSD s current stateapproved 5 year projection Based on an estimate of4 450 new housing units by the year 2000 and 9 420 new units by 2010 and other assumptions on birth rate trends and special education enrollment as described in Appendix J Volume 5 The Disneyland Resort EIR November 1992 ACSD estimates that enrollment will reach 24 006 by the year 2000 and 21 708 by 2010 The combination ofrising birth rates and rising rate of annual bome construction toward the middle of the projection period wbich taper off by the end of the period result in bigher projected enrollment in 2000 than in 2010 01719 CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 33 Public Services and Utilities e e ---PAGE BREAK--- r Anaheim son Specific Plan ErR e ACSD Classroom Seatinl Canacity ACSD seating capacity or the amount of classroom space available to house students is determined by first classifying each teacher work station in each ACSD school by type e g kindergarten or general classroom and by grade level Each classroom type is then multiplied by stale pupil loading standards expressed in terms of Average Daily Attendance ADA per teaching station ADA is equal to 97 percent of actuaI enrollment to account for the fact that some students are absent from school each day of the school year Since this is a formula used by the Stale to determine eligibility for capacity expansion e g new schools the ADA standards are fixed ona stalewide basis and do not necessarily conform with maximum class sizes as reflected in local school district policies and classroom teacher agreements Each individual school s seating capacity is the sum of these calculations for each respective teacher work station The 3 student loading standard used for general classrooms is an average for the Stale Department of Education pupil loading of 29 students per class for grades 1 3 and 33 students per class for grades 4 6 These classroom loading standards are consistent with the maximum standards permitted by the Stale Department of Education Applying the appropriate Stale loading facton as described above to the number of classrooms reported by ACSD for each school in the district provides an estimate of 19 275 seating capacity in the ACSD Relationshin of ACSD Enrollment and rnacity With a seating capacity of 19 275 in the ACSD there should be additional classroom space warranted through 2010 based on the tota1 number of housing units projects and the student meration rate of 0 313 Refer to Table 3 9 14 Future ACSD Enrollment Comparing enrollment as projected by ACSD to the Mrimof seating capacity indicates that by the year 2000 the district will have a 4 700 seat shortap By the year 2010 it is Dticipated that enrollment growth will slow at this time the deficit will decrease to about a 2 400 seat shortage pACSD projections estimate that year2000 2001 enrollment 22 401 students will come from existing development and 1 605 will come from post l992 housing Ifthe ACSD projection is correct there will DOt be seating capacity by the year 2000 toaccommodate the 1 605 students projected by the district tobe geoetated by post l992 development 1beIe studeots could be housed in about 40 portable or newly constructed classrooms if they were operated on a60 20 plan year round calendar If it isassumed that new classrooms are added at thesame ratio of multi track year round e CIlAICIlA 3 9 39 34PubUc Suvicu and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR use to traditional calendar use as is projected for the district in 1992 93 the 1 605 seats associated with new development would require 2 25 new schools Assuming that 57 percent Le the ratio of 12 year round schools to 21 total ACSD schools of a standard 600student elementary school operates year round with a capacity factor of 133 and 43 percent operates on a single track basis a 6OO student school could accommodate 713 students This estimating approach is consistent with the Fee Program Justification Report except that it uses a 1 33 factor for year round capacity whereas the ACSD Report uses 125 In the school year 20102011 ACSD projects that 18 636 students will be generated by existing development and 3 072 by new development Assuming that there are no permanent expansions in seating capacity beyond the 1991 92 situation there will be a surplus of 1 089 seats which could be filled by students from new development This leaves an unsatisfied need for 1 983 seats from new development by the year 2010 This requirement could be met with 50 portables all operated on a 60 20 plan calendar If on the other hand the same year round traditional calendar mix in newly constructed space which was noted above is assumed 2 78 schools would be needed It is important to remind the reader that this future need is based upon ACSD projections which were modeled using the bousing boom years of the 19805 wbich are no longer occurring Table 3 9 15 sbows the estimated 1992 1993 enrollment capacity relationsbip for the four elementary scbools closest to the proposed project area Overall these four schools are operating at about 12 percent over their capacity Stoddard Palm Lane and Ross are operating at ahigher percentage over capacity than Revere According to the information provided by ACSD Revere School is the only scbool sbown on this table that bas minimal remaining capacity ACSD Inter district Transfers As previously discussed a school district may consider applications for inter district transfers from parents wbo reside outside the district if the parent or guardian is employed within the boundaries of the district The inter district transfer program in the ACSD applies to students in all grades from kindergarten through the 8th grade According to an ACSD representative the district turns down four incoming transfer applications for every one it accepts primarily because of space limitations Over the past 4 years there has been a declining number of in coming ACSD inter district transfers and a fairly stable number of out going transfers In each year the number of out going transfers has exceeded in coming transfers These relationsbips are shown in Table 3 9 16 01721 CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 35 Public rvices and Utilities e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plim ElR e TABLE 3915 ENROlLMENT VS CAPACITY AT FOUR ACSD SCHOOLS IN THE PROJECT VICINlTY 1 92 1 93 School 1992 1993 Stoddard Capacity 768 Enrollment Difference 137 Palm Lane Capacity 873 Enrollment m Difference 25 Ross Capacity 335 Enrollment ill Difference 184 Revere Capacity 88S Enrollment w Difference 4 Total Capacity 2 861 Enrollment Ul3 Difference 342 May oot sum precisely lelllse of rounding Source ACSD 1993 TABLE 3 916 INTER DISl1UCf TRANSFERS TO AND FROM THE ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISl1UCf Il117 8l1 TO 1990 91 Tl TI Net Yell ID Out ChaD e 1987 88 158 297 139 198889 108 [PHONE REDACTED] 90 112 286 174 199091 62 243 181 Source AUHSD HR A 1992 Appendix J Reson Em 1992 93 update not available e CIlAICRA 39 3 936 Public SeTllicu D1Id Utilitiu ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR It is possible that some children of employees at the existing hotels motels and accessory Anaheim Resort uses attend ACSD schools through the inter listrict transfer program However the exact number of such students cannot be determined because the district considers the records of employment confidential In any case the number of such students would not constitute asignificant proportion of the total ACSD enrollment since it would be some fraction of the total number of transfer students 3 9 5 2 Environmental Imo3cts Anaheim Union High School District Direct Imoacts Since implementation of the project does not involve the construction of new dwelling units it will not have direct impacts on the AUHSD in terms of directly generating new students Concerning inter listrict transfers in the 7th and 8th grades there is DO evidence that there is asignificant demand among the current employees within the Anaheim Resort for such transfers and there is no reason to believe there will be any greater demand among the employees generated by future development projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area In any event a decision about whether to permit such inter listrict transfers is entirely within the control of the AUHSD Should capacity problems emerge in the future it is anticipated that permission for any project related inter listrict transfers would be denied because of lack of school capacity No significant direct impacts are anticipated to occur Indirect Imoacts The methodology for assessing potential indirect impacts is based on the methodology assumptions prepared for The Disneyland Resort ElR as noted in Section 3 IO S 1 and incorporated by reference herein It is estimated that implementation of the plan could produce a need for 2 409 dwelling units within the boundaries of the AUHSD by 2010 The area of Anaheim Buena Park and Cypress is larger than the AUHSD boundaries even though small portions of other cities which are in the AUHSD boundaries are DOt included Applying the AUHSD student generation rates described in Section 3 9 S 1 to the number of units implied by the housing demand analysis indicates that the project could generate at most S88 CltAlCRA 9 3 9 37 01723 Public Services and Utilities e ---PAGE BREAK--- it Anaheim Ireson Specific Pion ElR e AUHSD students 0 244 per household x 2 409 project related dwelling units 588 AUHSD students Anaheim City School District Direct ImDacts Since implementation ofthe project does not involve the construction ofnew dwelling units no direct generation ofnew students will take place Parents of X 8 students who reside outsidethe ACSD but want to enroll their children in disttict schools may have a direct impact This assumes that the current state legislation on such inter disttict ttansfers is extended beyond its sunset date in 1995 to coincide with the two projection periods of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area ie 2000 and 2010 Thereis no evidence of asignificant demand by existing Anaheim Resort employees for inter disttict ttansfers into the ACSD and there is no evidence to demonsttate a change in this situation for the project generated employees Permission for inter district ttansfers for children of specific development project employees could be denied by the ACSD because of lack of space preventing a project impact Implementation of the proposed project would not result in a significant direct impact to ACSD Indirect ImDacts A reasonable estimate of indirect school enrollment impacts can be determined from the estimate of the project s estimated indirect demand for housing in the City of Anaheim Additional information onthe project s indirect demand for housing is provided in Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing It shows an estimated for 2 409 units for all household income categories in the area of the Anaheim City School District by 2010 Applying the ACSD student i alItion rates based on 1992 93 data diSC lssed above to the number of housing units implied by project housing demand in Anaheim indicala that ofthe project could aeale 754 ACSD students by 2010 0 313 per homehold x 2 409 project related dwelling units 754 ACSD students Statutory De9eloper Fee for ACSD ud AUIISD Under state law California Government Code Section 53080 et seq a fee will be collected from the developer of future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area A specific project s fee is based on applicable floor area for structures multiplied by 0 28 per square foot e 3 9 3 938 PubUc Suvicu and Utilitiu ---PAGE BREAK--- AlUlheim Reson Specific Plan EIR as adjusted according to state law The impact fees will be evenly divided by the ACSD and AUHSD Assuming an average of 600 square feet of space generated for every hotel room by 2010 the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would generate up to an estimated 16 318 hotel rooms or approximately 9 8 million square feet of development for approximately million in developer To the extent that implementation of the Plan generates households occupying new housing units in the ACSD and AUHSD the developers of those units will also pay a statutory fee to the districts to mitigate school impacts Thus the districts will collect fees both from the future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and from builders ofnew homes into which project employee households may move Because of the time period over which the project will be implemented it is assumed in this analysis that 100 percent of employees of new within the Specific Plan area who move into the two school districts will move into dwelling units subject to a school fee The housing fee paid to the ACSD is based on an average unit size of 1 364 square foot per the ACSD Fee Program Justification Report and onehalf the current maximum statutory fee of 172 per square foot ie 0 86 Assuming the new employees generate the need for new development within the AUHSD and ACSD boundaries the residences are subject to a school fee the 2 400 new units would generate a total of 5 55 million 172 x 2 409 x 1 364 J 7 4ls S With the S2 65 million in developer fees from development within the Specific Plan area and 65 million in fees from projected new residential development a total of up to 8 3 million in school impact fees would be generated by project implementation The actual fees paid will be commensurate with the amount of development which occurs within the Specific Plan area and from residential development in the Districts The estimated cost of impacts to schools based on indirect impacts of 9 874 per new student at AUHSD and 10 478 at ACSD is based on the Hamilton Rabinovitz Alschuler Inc school impact assessment ofThe Disneyland Resort EIR Volume 5 Appendix J The 588 potential AUHSD students and 754 ACSD students would generate a cost impact of up to 13 7 million 5 8 million and 57 9 million respectively With developer fees from the project and new residential development totaling up to 58 3 million a shortfall ofS5 4 million in fees for new student incurred costs would result from project implementation 3 9 53 Mitintion Measures Mitintion Measure 3 951 Prior to issuance ofeach building permit the property owner developer shall provide proof to the Building Division of the Planning Department that school impact fees have been paid consistent with State statutes CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 39 PubUc Services and UtiUties 01725 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e 3 9 5 4 SiP1lificant Unavoidable Adverse Imoacts The proposed project will not bave any direct impacts on the AUHSD or ACSD The recommended mitigation measure imposes the maximum developer fee imposed by the state However the potential cost created by the new students generated by anticipated residential units within the AUHSD and ACSD will not be fully mitigated by the developer fees Specific Plan development is projected to result indirectly in the development ofbousing units wbicb will create significant impacts to the Scbool Districts 39 6 WATER SERVICE This section addresses the water distribution system serving the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Section 3 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology discusses the potential impacts of the project on available water supply An analysis ofthe effects of the project and related projects on water service was prepared as part of The Disneyland Resort Utility Study Appendix I Volume S of The Disneyland Resort EIR Where applicable the Utility Study as summarized berein is incorporated by reference into this analysis In addition this section contains analysis based on consultation with and information provided by the Anaheim Public Utilities Department Water Division 3 9 6 1 F nvi taJ Water service is provided to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department Water Division The ority of the City s water approximately 70 percent is pumped from the local groundwater basin Additional water is pun hased from the Metropolitan Water District MWD MWD is a wbolesale water lleocy for Southern California responsible for providing supplemental water water from a source other than local groundwater and surface water to water lleucies within its service area MWD contracll for water from the State Water Project SWP and the Colorado River As a wholesale qeacy MWD finances lS and operares the pipelines and other facilities to transport the water from the SWP and Colorado River to the area of service Water purveyors such IS the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Dep Water Division purchase imported water from MWD Purveyors transport the water from the wholesale lICIICY s storage facility or from turnoulI colUlCCtion points on the wbolesaler s distribution pipeline and provide water service to their clients e Cl AlCIlA 3 9 3 PubUc Services D1Id UliUdu ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Piml EIR Local Settilll From a preliminary network model of the water system it was determined that the proposed water production well at Lewis Street and Cerritos Avenue is too far from the area of demand to adequately meet the supply needs To meet the supply needs an additional well is proposed to be constructed at the intersection of Clementine Street and Freedman Way This well would be sized to meet maximum well design criteria as set by the City ofAnaheim and is proposed to pump approximately 4 000 gpm Well No 41 the closest source of groundwater which serves the Specific Plan area was drilled and has been operating for the last 9 years at the intersection of Convention Way and West Street A connection to the MWD system at the intersection of Katella Avenue and West Street Disneyland Drive provides back up service for the well Well No 41 feeds two 2Qinch mains one in Convention Way between West Street and Harbor Boulevard and another in West Street from Convention Way to Katella Avenue Well No 41 the existing MWD connection and the distribution lines are capable of supplying the existing maximum day demands and peak bour demands to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The system can supply a maximum of 4 million gallons per day mgd for short periods of time several hours Iffor any reason there is a pressure drop in this area adjacent lines in surrounding streets can feed the loop at a lower pressure The location and sizes of the water service lines are described in more detail in Appendix I Utility Analysis of The Disneyland Resort EIR Additional wells and water mains may serve portions of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area north of Ball Road The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is serviced by water mains on Walnut Street West Street Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard These service lines range in size from 6 to 16 inches The water distribution system in the area bas recently been upgraded to a single pressure zone 97 98 psi 335 foot static bydraulic grade line In 1992 the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance No 5349 entitled the Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance to reduce and conserve landscape related water consumption The purpose of this ordinance is to promote efficient water use througb landscape design appropriate to Anaheim s climate zone The ordinance applies to all new and rebabilitated public industrial commercial and institutional landscaping and developer installed landscaped common areas in singlefamily and multi family residential land uses As such the documentation and monitoring requirements of the Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance would apply to landscaping proposed within the Anaheim CIlAJCIlA 9 3 9 41 Public Services and Utilities 01727 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Reson Specific Plan ElR Resort Specific Plan area In addition to conservation measures mandated by the Landscape WIter Efficiency Ordinance reclaimed water can be used effectively and safely to irrigate landscaping and for ornamental water features such as ponds and waterways Use of reclaimed water for these purposes is encouraged by the City of Anaheim 3 9 6 2 Environmental Imoads Projected Total water consumption for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will consist of domestic demands irrigation for landscaping evaporative losses from pools and ponds and chiller recharge The maximum day domestic water demand in year 20I0 for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is calculated on peak day demand at mgd based upon peak demand faaor of 15 times an average d g v ay In order to construct future development projects within the Anaheim Resort some of the existinJ facilities in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be demolished and will 110 longer demand 1 0 water from the local system The estimated total net increase in average consumption is 2mgd for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area This estimate is based on the approximate demands of each component of the project 11IIII111I111 into account existing facilities within the project area that could be abandoned as part of future development within the Specific Plan area Peak Demand The peak water utilization times for all of these do not svily coincide with one another Water I for irrigation chiller recharp and resupply of evaporative losses will most likely occur late at night or early in the mornin when facility water d are lowest whereas peak domestic d for varioua usa ie boteIa restaurants balbrooma will most likely occur throughout the day The peak domestic demofor each facility will not occur at the same time peak hour for hotels is between 9 am and 10 a m peak hour for wuuua l ia1 buildinp is bettlleen 10 am and II I m peak hour for retai is between 2 p m and 3 p m As mentioned earlier Well No 41 the existing MWD connection and the distribution lines are capable of supplyinc a ilDUm of 4 mgd for short perioda oftime However impl Wion of e CRAlCIIA 3 9 3 9 42 Pubic rWcu 01Id Udlitiu ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will result in a net increase in average daily water consumption by mgd refer to Table 3 9 17 q I TABLE 3 917 PROJECTED WATER CONSUMPTION YEAR 2010 Total Area Load Demand Component s f ga1 s Uyr gaUyr 16 318 Hotel Rooms 7 [PHONE REDACTED] 714 728 400 Restaurant 979 080 46 730 on 456 oee Retail 979 080 43 8 42 883 704 Project Net Increase 187 lIlI1 Existing 11 190 Hotel Rooms 6 [PHONE REDACTED] 612 652 500 Year 2010 Annual Demand 27 77217404 Total Average Daily mgd Demand 2010 5 7 Psomas Associates 1992 Assumes 600 square feet per room per City of Anaheim 2 94 Assumes approximately 20 percent of the total botelmotel room square footage may be devoted to accessory uses 10 percent retail IO percent restaurant 80 percent rooms Average daily demand is annual demand 365 Source MBA 1994 71 1ag 100 1 7 j Vo 5iI Ogl r 00 The increased water demand for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area can be satisfied from other wells in the 335 pressure zone and the construction of transmission pipelines atHarbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue across 1 5 Development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area in addition to implementation of the Disneyland Resort will requite construction of the new well at the intersection of Clementine Street and Freedman Way With the construction of this well there is no necessity for the construction ofthe Harbor Boulevard Transmission Main across 1 5 However the Orangewood Avenue line would still be required to adequately service the demands of the Specific Plan area Ifthe new well at Clementine Street and Freedman Way is not constructed by Year 2010 other water supply mechanisms including the transmission pipelines across 1 5 at Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue would be sufficient to provide adequate water service to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area at 2010 buildout CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 43 01729 Public rvices and Utilities e ---PAGE BREAK--- 11 AruJheim Resort Specific Plan ErR Fire Mow The adequacy of fire flow protection for agiven area is based on required fire flow responsedistance from existing fire stations and the City ofAnaheim Fire Deparnnents judgment of needs in an area Required fire flow is closely related to land use The quantity of water necessary for fire protection varies with the type ofdevelopment life hazard occupancy and the degree offire hazard According to the Anaheim Fire Deparnnent the system presently can provide 6 000 gpm for the 2 hour fire incident at 20 psL According to the City ofAnaheim Fire Department 6 000 gpm is required for fire flow in noo sprinklered buildings For sprinklered buildings the requirement is 4 000 gpm New buildings will be designed with sprinklers for fire protection Refer to Mitigation Measure 3 9 1 3 Fire flows have not been considered in the potable water demand calculations Because fire flow demands are intermittent and variable it is standard industry practice not to consider fire flow in demand calculations 10 evaluating the water system the City will add the fire flow demand to the peak day demand to determine the pipe sizes 3 9 6 3 Miti tina Measures Mitqation Measure 3 9 61 Prior to issuance of each building permit er apjlFe a1llf h I cbeape pllB ilia er first to be implemented prior to fina1 building and zoning inspections and continuing ontoo going hasis during project operation the property owoec developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department plans for review and approval which aball ensure that water conservation measures are incolpOrated Among the water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property owoec deveioper to the extent applicable Sjlwific PIIII lIflIl include but are not limited to the followina Use of low flow sprinkler heads in irrigation syatema Use of waterWay recirculation systanI Low flow fittiDp fixtures and equiplllelltincludina low flush toilets and urinals Use of self dosina valves on drinkiDg fountains Hit 4f reeI w far irrilatiGB aM ule a h l b afllil le Use of efficient irription syatema such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors Use of low flow shower heads in boteIs caAICItA 3 9 3 944 PubUc rvicu and Utililiu ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plmz EIR Water efficient ice machines dishwashers clothes washers and other water using appliances Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible llitifa v un 3 Fliul to 11 nal rsfti 4 d buildiu5 U yadUIl dIe prupexly 9 YRer develepel shall SUBmit A 1lifi waLe audit tUl lcIJld IoAp iu IAMiaR 3YSteR1 18 ehliti91l ill eRfs1 ftl8llte W ith th Ciluf Auanelm s Landscape waiel effi in GreiRanee the g Retodc dopc 1hall ublUjL it Landscape DUl uUl utAti3fl ask for tf iti lAd aI BY the PlarJiiBl and Utll ti ayy afJriMe A atj MOGloC lI 1 Q t Drigr It URU Mal 1l9aiBg 8Rd o lildillg intpectiQP h prnp rty dt 9lgper skall aMBle 1kat e h htlihliag is aeveleped wim dlutl pipieg te famaw ute of reel imed water he8 it becvm availAble frUIII dlC Cuumy SardUldon of OIiU1 C LUUlIly r ut in landl api 8 ilett and Hriaals J Miti ation Measure 3 96 A Prior to approval of the first subdivision map or the issuance of the first grading permit or building permit whichever occurs first the property owner developer shall enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim to the satisfaction of the Utilities Department and City Attorney s Office to guarantee the property owner developer s panicipation in water system improvements necessitated by the project The agreement shall contain provisions requiring the property owner developer to payor cause to be paid its fair share funding for said improvements and orconstruct said improvements if determined to be necessary by the Utilities Department with reimbursement by other beneficiaries in accordance with the Utility s Rates Rules and Regulations Costs shall include the payment for consultantcontractor services for the preliminary engineering soils analysis right of way acquisition demolition construction and inspection and any other related expenses Further the property owner developer shall submit an engineering repon and phasing plan for review and approval by the Utilities Department setting forth the extent and timing of the water system improvements necessitated by the project for use in implementing the agreement The property owner developer shall at all times perform its obligations as set forth in said agreement Water system improvements identified in the environmental documentation for buildout of the Anaheim Reson which the property owner developer may be required to panicipate in include 01731 CRAlC lA9 3 9 45 Public Services and Utilities e ---PAGE BREAK--- elI 1 Anoheim Reson Specific Pion EIR The existing 8 inch diameter pipe in Clementine Street from Katella Avenue to Freedman Way shall be replaced by a 2oinch diameter pipe The existing loinch diameter pipe in Freedman Way from Clementine Street to Harbor Boulevard shall be replaced by a 2oinch diameter pipe onll IAhV The existing loinch diameter pipe in Harbor Boulevard from Katella 8IIlI to Freedman Way shall be replaced by a 2Oinch diameter pipe The l2 inch pipe in Katella Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street shall be replaced by a 2oinch diameter pipe The existing loinch diameter pipe in Harbor Boulevard from Freedman Way to Harbor Boulevard north of Manchester Avenue shall be replaced by a l6inch diameter pipe An additional water well shall be constructed near the intersection of Clementine Street and Freedman Way The existing l4inch and l2 inch diameter pipes in West Street from Katella Avenue to Ball Road shall be replaced by a 2Oinch pipe Mi t uIIbmUl C 3 65 flul W fb d BuHdU D A thAucdic1ln Reson WIJI be d auycd w chI dun ul me elL uf Au4bl Jtilih HIUU UI ALa 3b y wieb piPiDtl Olllitt tQ II reel d hcr1 it is avlil lt 9n rnlJ 1l nitmnn nitor 8 ge t CSDOC on u G ill It im R tR WIlIWlyl aad for iRip iea r d Ae JrH CU 3 1 1W3 fD Y Wil cJ If 11 1101 3 9 6 4 J nIfIto ont V vol Advene The project related impacts have been mitigated to a 1 than significant level therefore 110 significant unavoidable impacts are expected 3 9 7 WASTEWATERJSEWER SERVICE The City rec eot1y completed prepuatioo of the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study to identify sewer system deficieocies fur aim and future dry we8tber flows and to reviae the August 1991 Central City Sewer Deficiency Study Anaheim Resort prepared by CH2M Hill for the City of Anaheim The South Central Area encompuses the Anaheim Resort The revised study considers higher densities and related projects in and around the Anabeim Resort i 1INl problems in the localized sewer lines and projected sewer flaM for the tota1 buildout of the Anaheim Resort For the purpose of this lIIalysis sewer system impacts usocilted with implemeutllioo of the Anabeim Resort Specific Plan have been prepared for buildout ofthe Anabeim Resort Portiolll ofthe South CIlA CIlA 3 9 3 9 46 Public Servica and UrlUtiu OH32 ---PAGE BREAK--- Insert for Page 3 9 46 new mitigation measures Miti2ation Measure 3 9 63 Prior to issuance ofeach building permit all water supply pI g for tileproject wiI1 be doseIy coordinated with andbe subject to the review and fmal approval of the Utilities Department Water p gi ring Division and Fire Department Miti2ation Measure 3 9 6 4 Prior to issuance of each building permit water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch psi shall be reduced to 80 psi or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property OWIIllr deveIoper s service e t ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study have been summarized in this section For the purpose of this analysis it is anticipated that by year 2000 The Disneyland Resort will be in full operation Additionally the following assumptions are included in the analysis of wastewater sewer impacts The improvements identified in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR will be implemented by buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area v The improvements identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency StudySi r i V be implemented by buildout of the Anaheim Resort 3 9 7 1 Environmental Conditions Regional Setting The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is served by the City of Anaheim local sanitary sewer system which is a tributary to the County Sanitation District of Orange County CSDOC The CSDOC consists of fourteen sub districts which encompass 439 square miles Wastewater from City sewers are conveyed through the trunk and interceptor sewers to regional treatment and disposal facilities The CSDOC interceptor sanitary sewer serving the Anaheim area flows west through Garden Grove then south to the District s Treatment Plant Number I in Fountain Valley Plant Number I has a total capacity of60 million gallons per day mgd The Fountain Valley plant along with Treatment Plant Number 2 in Huntington Beach treats wastewater from 24 Orange County cities Together the treatment plants process more than 270 mgd of wastewater Approximately 80 percent of the total effluent is generated by residential uses the balance comes from industrial or commercial sources Treated effluent is discharged into thePacific Ocean through an outfall pipe offshore from Huntington Beach Future CSDOC expansion plans involve the construction of three upstream water reclamation plants with a capacity of 43 mgd and development of a water reclamation system for irrigation in the Anaheim area The CSDOC also plans to expand Plant Number I in Fountain Valley to process 120 mgd of wastewater The CSDOC currently reclaims up to 15 mgd of secondary treatment water from the Fountain Valley plant which is purified at the Orange County Water District Factory 21 The purified water is injected into the groundwater table to block seawater intrusion The CSDOC has proposed plans to reclaim an additional 15 mgd for industrial use and landscape irrigation 01734 CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 47 Public Services and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Local Setting The South Central Area of the City of Anaheim the study area encompassing the Anaheim Resort is considered the most deficient area in the City Forty three sewer sub basins were delineated within the study area on the basis of the following topographic features the configuration and alignment of the wastewater collection system present and year 2010 land uses and the placement of the flow monitoring devices Analysis of the existing collection system under dty weather flow conditions revealed deficient pipe defects throughout the system The total length ofpipe found to be deficient was 20 845 lineal feet representing 4 8 percent of the sanitary sewer collection system in the study area Peak dry weather flow in these deficient lines ranged from f to 244 percent of existing pipe v capacity The study area as illustrated in Exhibit 3 9 2 is made up of residential commercial and industrial land uses and includes portions of Anaheim and Garden Grove and a section ofunincorporated land in Orange County Wastewater from the study area flows by gravity through the Anaheim collection system to the County Sanitation District of Orange County CSDOC trunk lines for ultimate treatment and disposal This area is irregularly shaped generally extending to Vermont Avenue on the north the southern City limits on the south Euclid Street on the west and State College Boulevard on the east The six main sewer area facility basins are shown on Exhibit 3 9 2 and are identified as the Katella Avenue basin Orangewood Avenue basin Ball Road basin Cerritos Avenue Euclid Street basin Cerritos Avenue Walnut Street basin and Chapman Avenue basin in conjunction with the City of Garden Grove area facility basin On Walnut Street south of Ball Road there is a district lwned 24inch sewer line which increases to a 27 inch line flowing southerly to Katella Avenue The 27 inch District line turns at Katella Avenue where it flows westerly and joins a 27 inch District sewer line approximately 30 feet north of where the 24 inch City line in Katella Avenue joins the two 24 inch lines at Ninth Street This 24 inch District line flows south for approximately 30 feet where it connects to a manhole and the flow separates into the two 24 inch sewer outlets mentioned above The District has completed construction of a 1t inch interceptor line in Ball Road This 33 inch District line relieves flows in the 24 inch and 27 inch pipes in Walnut Street which are tributary to the District 24 inch line in Ninth Street Also the district recently completed its relief trunk sewer in Katella Avenue from Ninth Street to Euclid Street thus diverting any flows from going into the Ninth Street sewer line CRA CRA3 9 3 9 48 Public Services and Utilities 01734 1 eel 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The City sewer main in Orangewood Avenue flows west increasing in size from 10 inches to 15 inches and finally to 18 inches This sewer line is at capacity east of Ninth Street The peak flow rate as measured in July and August 1990 was 3 07 mgd which is 83 percent of capacity This line discharges into the 24 inch CSDOC sewer line at Ninth Street this line becomes a 27 inch line south of Chapman Avenue The Orangewood Avenue sewer line is at or near capacity and cannot accommodate any additional flows A 48 inch increasing to 54 inch District trunk line in Euclid Street flowing south to the Fountain Valley Treatment Plant has recently been constructed to relieve capacity problems in the existing CSDOC trunk line in Euclid Street and provide additional capacity for future flows Sewage impacts resulting from implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and other related projects requires construction of the improvements identified in Table 3 9 18 3 9 7 2 Environmental Imoacts The Sewer Deficiency Study analyzed existing facilities for capacities or restrictions and based on year 2010 buildout land use conditions identified necessary improvements Based on the deficiency study future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area may be required to conduct subsequent technical review for wastewater impacts and implement specific sanitary sewer improvements and management techniques if necessary o 3 6 ife e1 o e Sh r 1 oE r r o be o c t h ond As identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study by year 2010 a cumulative total of CDor or 0 1 dL 39 947 linear feet or an increase in 19 102 linear feet of pipe segment deficiencies resul t Deficient pipe segments include those pipes that will not have sufficient capacity to accommodate t anticipated growth and those that are identified as having operational and or maintenance deficiencies v As indicated in Table 3 9 18 peak dry weather flow in the deficient lines ranged from 85 to 381 percent of existing pipe capacity The increase in deficient pipe capacity from existing to post 2010 t conditions indicates a low to moderate growth rate per the assumptions identified in Section 2 3 of this EIR and further the South Central Area is almost entirely developed Future development would mainly involve redevelopment of existing land uses and development of some new uses including The Disneyland Resort project and Hotel Circle project if approved However for the purposes ofthis EIR the impacts are assessed based on 100 percentof the maximum allowable density being developed by year 2010 Based on ultimate development of an additional 16 318 hotel room accessory uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area it is anticipated that future development within these boundaries would generate an additional average daily sewage flow of approximately 2 2 mgd by 2010 r e 01735 3 9 49 Public Services and Utilities CRAlCRA 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- OS H Beam Blvd I Ii J J E I i cI f Dale 51 l I J J J J f I u c Ave Gilbert 51 j J BroakhUBl 51 I Milwood 51 Milwood 51 r f Eudid 51 Un II 9th 51 I utSt t West 51 I I I L I Harbor Blvd 0 I l sf I r r a S III f L t 7af S01 CO i Stall Colene J 1 l kist 51 J 1 i IR 7 FWY I J pI G1assel Sf S I SR 55 FWY l O I l r ii n n TI n tl l l I r Vl0 3 Drn o n n m 0 ct l m CD I D 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e TABLE 3 918 EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM DEFlCIENCIES AlliI RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS FOR YEAR 2010 e Year 2010 Condition Deficient Sewer Lines Reoommended Existing Improvement Pipe Percent Existing parallel P L f Ci ity Di eter or Iace Selected Location Limits in Diameter Ball Road West St to EfWalnut 1398 00 114 24 P 15 Ball Road Claremont to WIHarbor 1784 00 97 140 24 R 27 p KateU Ave Walnut to Ninth 1335 00 145 161 24 P 21 Katella Ave West to Walnut 1323 00 125 139 24 P 21 KateU Ave Harbor to 650 ft ElWest 1951 00 110 114 24 P 15 KateU AVe 650 ft EfWest to West 649 00 131 133 24 P 18 Manchester Ave Palm 1F 1 51 to Harbor 1013 00 11 121 15 P 12 Harbor Blvd Manchester to N Freedman 1032 00 13 139 15 P 12 Harbor Blvd N Freedman to KateU 2352 00 142 215 15 P 15 Katella AVe Harbor to WIHarbor 59 00 104 24 P 12 West St N Cerritos to Cerritos 703 00 104 24 P 12 n p n Oran ewood Ave Ninth to Harbor 5275 00 9 139 18 P 15 Harbor Blvd NIConvention Way to 1575 00 85 307 15 P 12 Oran ewood Wakefield AVe Mt View to WfMt View 284 00 85 8 P 8 MI View Ave Wakefield to Pearson 781 00 135 219 8 P 10 Mt View Ave Pearson to Oran ewood 356 00 266 301 8 P 12 OranO ewood AVe Mt View to Hasler 841 00 92 114 10 P 8 Ave Hasler to Clementine 1310 00 17204 10 P 12 Oranlzewood AVe Clementine to Harbor Blvd 1186 00 247 254 10 P 15 n WJ T l lIIgR it M away OJ 0 r e Ln m Qr CRAlCRA 9 3 9 51 Public Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 918 continued Year 2010 Condition Deficient Sewer Lines Recommended Existing lmprovement Pipe Percent Existing parallel P Ci ity Di r or face Selected Location Limits Diameter v OJ V 0 Qo 0 or n 0 00 141 0 u KJteYa 8 Katella Ave E O Ninth St Ninth SI 12 161 24 P 24 n IS e ImT 0 l 12 CII b A Source Cilv of Anaheim Sooth Ce Area SewDeficiencv S dv January 1993 Implementation of future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would trigger the need to implement the improvements recommended in the City s South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study Implementation of these improvements will enable the sewer system to accommodate development within the Anaheim Resort beyond the 2010 year horizon of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Water conservation will be an important part of projects implemented in conformance with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and it will be achieved through numerous measures intended to reduce water consumption and will therefore reduce wastewater flows The water conservation measures to be implemented are outlined in Section 3 9 6 3 of this EIR CRAlCRAJ 9 3 9 52 01738 Public Services and Utilities e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 9 7 3 Miti2ation Measures lliti2ation lfeasure 3 9 7 1 Prier Ie appre a1 ef a final subd iuu nap fir i33 aucc ue building permit for all R Qi and or hd vdvl I1lI IIL lJrujecLS widliu the AnaLcim ResortSpecific pJ an rp thP City M tpr P1ilR gf Se ef3 llhd 1 l ldted Iufla llulcture Impro emeRts Fee Program to assiH in mitigating 3ftMitiUy l WCI y tt1Il dcfilic1113 as fe Ho ws 1 L a The fJrepeft 6 nlId shall 3l 1bJal t a ulvtl fVI l V ew and appFeval bythe Eity Clloillcel to t ith ddc lllliuillg th eronowiu if the develGpmeRt reae elopmeRt 1 aees Retdiseharge ffite a se er s stcm that iS cuH ully d hc t GEwill ee elPP npfidellt eeCatl3 of tl discharge ana or 2 does not lfiaease fluw or ch puin13 of d d i11l e then me propeny owner s aeveloperTresponsibility shall b l lUt to participdl uu ill die FeerProgram If the dvdvIJwcuu u m t di5 h41 into seWef system thatis currently defi ient or ill b colnG d f i lll beGlIlIs ef that discl argc and ar increase fle sr d 4l l men dIe IJluPetty o ncr de elsper shall be required tv lU4lantee f iull ue d City u iu 4l d Ci Y Anomey s offIce of the Impactprior 10 applUvdi ue a fmal subdivision map or isslulll e of a building permit whiclls er o firM p 10 the 1prQ pm nts identified in the SQutll Cent alArea Sewer Deficiency StOOy The property o nerfde elsper shall be required l rinstall the sanitary sewer fa ilitie as reeommend b thG SOllth Central D hc cu Studl priOl o r pt llnf P fnr maintenancp nf pllh1k eUldS b the Cit aT final bui1tiinj Inn mning in pections for th ilqiRg truentre whiehever fiut the prspeity 8 n l d vdu JC 1 hcdl p t dpatt ia the Iafl3Etructute Improyement reX F 4l11 de ellllim d by d Cil Engineer which csulll iRclude re eredits f hbuu I1JC IlLS VI 4 I vwbiRatien thereaf A p a rt of ilrr t iRg the mitigatiaR af impacts fOl the 38 8itary sewer system the ptope OU1nprc deu IQper iblll 6 llJmit Ii 3anitaf se er sy telR filGnt pha3ing plan fur dt proj Xt to thCity EtJ ilJt CI Or rc vi w and apPd al whieh 3haH eentain at a minim llH 1 a 14 3tlt v t h I vlUpl t jJ te m 2 ail ail C I III tinn1 rutructi9A pb3SiAg a RQ 1 mtru l vlI timates 3 9 7 4 Silmificant Unavoidable Adverse Imoacts Following implementation of the mitigation measures no significant unavoidable impacts are anticipated 3 9 8 STORM DRAINS The City recently completed preparation of the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to analyze existing facilities and identify existing and projected deficiencies in the system The CRACRA 3 9 53 Public Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Replacement for Page 3 9 53 1itilfation Measure 3 9 7 1 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit whichever occurs fust the property o NIlerjdeveloper shaH participate in the Citys Master Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvements Fee Program to assist in mitigating existing and future sanitary sewer system deficiencies as follows The property owner developer shall submit a report for review and approval by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following a If the development redevelopment 1 does not discharge into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and or 2 does not increase flows or change points of discharge then the property owner s developer s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the nfrastructure Improvement Fee Program b If the development redevelopment 1 discharges into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and or 2 increases flows or changes points of discharge then the property owner developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the CityEngineer and CityAttorney s office ofthe impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance ofa grading or building permit whichever occurs first pursuant to the improvements identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study The property owner developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities as recommended by the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspections for the building structure whichever occurs first Additionally the property owner developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement Fee Program as determined by the City Engineer which could include fees credits reimbursements or a combination thereof As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts for the sanitary sewer system the property owners developer shall submit a sanitary sewer system improvement phasing plan for the project to the City Engineer for review and approval which shall contain at a minimum 1 a layout of the complete system 2 all facility sizes including support calculations 3 construction phasing and 4 construction estimates The study shaJl determine the impact of the project sewer flows for total buiIdout of the project and identify local deficiencies for each project component Le each hotel e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR purpose of the Master Plan of Drainage is to provide the City with comprehensive long range planning for the implementation and development of drainage facility improvements in the area For the purpose of this analysis storm drain impacts associated with implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan have been prepared for buildout of the Anaheim Resort Portions of the Master Plan of Drainage have been summarized in this section For the purposes of this analysis it is anticipated that The Disneyland Resort will be in full operation by the year 2000 Additionally the following assumptions are included in the analysis of storm drain impacts The improvements identified in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR will be implemented by buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area First Revision will be implemented by buildout of the Anaheim Resort 3 9 8 1 Environmental Conditions Regional Setting The regional facilities serving the Anaheim Resort include the Anaheim Barber City ABC channel the East Garden Grove Wintersburg EGGW Channel aster Basin which is parr of the EGGW Channel and the Carbon Creek Channel CCC The ABC Channel begins at Ball Road where storm drains conveying runoff from 1 571 acres from areas 19 and 20 enter the channel fefer t9 lixhibit 3 9 3 The majority of flows from Areas 21 22 and 32 enter the channel via storm drains in Cerritos Avenue Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue The channel has a capacity at Ball Road Katella Avenue and Cerritos Avenue approximately equal to a 10 year storm Me OC hlA J J J I N sC c T1 OVf r rt 1 c l j s1 5 Ic S t IM l7 v 7h S c ol3 e 1 fA t ItJ t7 1ty Y The EGGW Channel and Haster Ad WISlf8lll Basi are under the jurisdiction of the OCFCD which is administered by OCEMA The EGGW Channel outlets to Haster Basin The channel was originally designed in the early 19605 to convey a 25 year storm Since that time hydrologic criteria has changed and the channel has less than a IO year capacity A study being completed by OCEMA has indicated the overall capacity of EGGW Channel upstream of Haster Basin and the Haster and West Street Basins to be less than a 2 year storm OCEMA is currently studying options to improve the EGGW Channel system of which ter and West Street basin a part The results of their l J study scheduled to be published in late H3 will indicate proposed improvements and phased construction schedule to improve the system to at least a25 year storm capacity These improvements are expected to be constructed within the next 20 years 0 14 CRAiC A 9 3 9 54 Public Services and ---PAGE BREAK--- I I rum If I t a t CI I C cf 0 0 Q tII I Ii SN E t t I I 1 ZvHO 1 1 u U1IS ST1far 0 Il L jl I l I I 3 fr n o C Cil I No vI o rcr V r nJ r n n I Cn tTJ s s cr t e 5 0 n one c rl3 nlen o go or m55 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Carbon Creek Channel has a capacity equivalent to a 5 to 10 year storm The OCDV whichhas juri d ct nn nv regio il facilities IlIl5 n8 plans to imprQ e aaheim Ilarber City Cllar nel within tile next 2Q e lts OCEMA completed a study of Carbon Creek in 1989 and is currently improving the LV co system These improvements will upgrade tIl e tire system to a 25 year level of protection and are expected to be constructed with the next 20 years The intermediate facilities include the West Street storm drain owned by the City of Garden Grove and the Oertley Spinnaker and West Anaheim storm drains owned by OCEMA The capacity of these storm drains range from a 2 year to 8 year storm The Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA has indicated on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps FIRM that the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is within Flood Zone X Zone X is subject to flooding during a 500 year storm or during a lOO year storm with a flood depth less than I foot Flood Zone X is out of the lOO year flood zone However the OCFCD Channels and areas immediately adjacent to these channels are in Flood Zone A which is subject to flooding in stOI1l events of lesser intensity than the IOO year storm Flooding in these areas is because of a lack of capacity in the lower Santa Ana River Orange County is in the process of improving the lower Santa Ana River from 1 405 to its outfall at the Pacific Ocean Also proposed are the construction of the Seven Oaks Dam in Redlands and the raising of the Prado Dam in Riverside County by 284 feet These three improvement projects are included in OCFCD s 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan LocaJ Setting In 1973 the City published a Master Plan of Drainage for the City of Anaheim That report divided the City into 42 drainage areas nine of whicb are in the South Central Area These nine areas are numbered 18 through 26 as shown on Exhibit 3 9 4 South Central Area Drainage Area Area 18 drains to the Carbon Creek Channel Areas 19 through 23 drain to the ABC Channel and Areas 24 to 26 drain to facilities that are tributary to the EGGW Channel The majority of the mainline facilities in the study area were built in the late 19605 and early 19705 and are identified as existing facilities on the 1973 Master Plan of Drainage These facilities include the Cerritos Avenue Katella Avenue Ball Road and South Street storm drains Since that time many ofthe proposed facilities identified in the 1973 Master Plan have also been built Nonetheless the City determined that there was a need to prepare a new Master Plan of Drainage based on changes to the hydrologic criteria and future development proposed and or anticipated within the Anaheim Resort CRAlC1lA J 9 3 9 56 Public Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR The local facilities include all facilities owned by the City of Anaheim These facilities are classified as those tributary to Anaheim Barber City Channel those tributary to the EGGW Channel and Haster Basin and those tributary to the Carbon Creek channel Based on the findings of the recently completed Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area the existing storm drain system has a capacity of a 2 year to 8 year storm Improvements to these facilities will be necessary to increase the overall system capacity to at least a IO year and 25 year storm depending upon the panicular drainage basin These improvements consist of parallel storm drains relief drains extensions of existing systems and removal and replacement of existing facilities The following analysis has been summarized from the City s Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area Refer to Exhibit 3 9 4 which illustrates the local drainage areas identified in the following discussion Drainale Areas Within the South Central Area ABC Tributaries Area 19 Drainage from Area 19 flows to the Ball Walnut South Street storm drain The flow rate is approximately equal to a 5 year storm Flows unable to enter the storm drain will overtop the curbs on Vermont Santa Ana and South Streets These flows will pond at sumps adjacent to the railroads and the Santa Ana Freeway until they are able to enter the storm drain system Area 20 Drainage from Area 20 flows to the Ball Road storm drain which outlets to the ABC Channel The existing flow rate is approximately equal to a 2 year storm There are several sumps in the drainage area one at 1 5 one at the Southern Pacific Railroad and one at the AllChison Topeka and Santa Fe AT SF Railroad Water from the to year storm will pond at these sumps until it can enter the storm drain Flows in these dump locations along Ball Road will pond above the top of the curb Street flow between Anaheim Boulevard Harbor Boulevard and the Santa Ana Freeway will be above the top of the curb for a Ioyear storm Flow at the Santa Ana Freeway near Harbor Boulevard will pond until it can enter the storm drain Flows in Ball Road between the west side ofthe freeway and the ABC will be within the 17 foot limit due to ponding on the east side of the freeway e 01744 CRA CRA 3 9 3 9 57 Public Services and ---PAGE BREAK--- mf 1C t 1 1 1 C J IDB I l tl r i I U r I l II e enRil r Gj et 1 Id B JV m H EJ 1 BEii5 11 0 El nJlc J I g mlW J IU lfi l l DLJJU E3 Ui rJ J II I g rl f 1 u w w J n J i li gg tu 1 i l I l f g@ JI JI LJI 1 U L JCI ll g i I ll a u I n III E Jll c r F u l qi II j I a tf rit II L 1 1 I r d il li yi d II ll l Legend CLl Drain Ana IN s J 1 Michael a dnun ADociaccs Exhibit 3 9 4 South Central Area Drainage Areas Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIW 005500 0 394 H S8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Area 21 The majority of flow from Drainage Area 21 drains to the Cerritos Avenue storm drain which outlets to the ABC ChanneL The storm drain on West Street can handle 60 percent of a 10 year storm The storm drain on Walnut Street can handle 50 percent of a lO year storm The overall storm drain system can handle a 2 year storm Due to this fact and the flat streets in the area West Street Walnut Street and Cerritos Avenue will flood well beyond the 17 foot limit desired by the City Area 22 Area 22 drains to the Katella Avenue storm drain which outlets to the ABC ChanneL The storm drain has approximately a 2 year storm capacity The sump of Anaheim Boulevard north of Palais Drive will flood above the top of the curb during a 10 year storm The Harbor Boulevard lateral can convey 50 percent of the lO year storm The remaining street flow in Harbor Boulevard will overtop the curb in a lO year storm Flow in Katella Avenue unable to enter the storm drain will overtop the curb in a lO year storm EGGWC and the Haster Basin Tributaries Area 24 Drainage from Area 24 flows to the West Street storm drain which outlets to the West Street Basin in the City of Garden Grove The flow rate is approximately equal to a 2 year storm Flows not in the storm drain will flood beyond the 17 foot flooded limit in West Street and Orangewood Avenue Area 25 Drainage from Area 25 flows to the Oertley storm drain which outlets to Haster Basin The existing flow rate is approximately equal to a 2 year storm The flow not in the storm drain will overtop the curb in Orangewood Avenue Harbor Boulevard Chapman Avenue and Haster Street Carbon Creek Channel to West Anaheim Storm Drain Tributaries Area 18 Drainage from Area 18 flows to the West Anaheim storm drain which outlets to Crescent Basin which is tributary to the Carbon Creek ChanneL The existing flow rate is approximately equal to a 2 year storm The majority of flow enters the storm drain from the Broadway storm drain Flows unable to enter the storm drain will flow east on the streets of Broadway Santa Ana Street and Lincoln Avenue to Manchester Avenue flooding Manchester Avenue above the top of curb Flows to Lincoln Avenue at the Santa Ana freeway and on Santa Ana Street from South Street north to Santa Ana Street will flood beyond the 17 foot flooded width limit These storm drain lines and most ofthe existing lines in the study area weredesigned and constructed over 25 years ago based on outdated OCFCD criteria The OCFCD has revised its storm drain design e 3 9 59 Public Services and Utilities CRAJCRA 3 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR requirements Evaluation of these existing storm drain lines under the new OCFCD criteria may indicate that most lines are currently inadequate and can only accommodate a 2 year frequency storm event 3 9 8 2 Environmental ImDacts In general runoff within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan study area will be collected by roof drains trench drains area drains and catch basins and directed via a subsurface drainage system to the public storm drain system The following lists the general impacts on runoff conditions that would result from future developments built within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Future storm drain points of connection to the public storm drain system are assumed to be in approximately the same location as existing points of connection Development of the area currently draining to the public storm drain system in Drainage Areas 18 19 20 21 22 24 and 25 will result in an increase in stormwater runoff The existing pipes in these areas are inadequate to handle any increase in drainage runoff flows from future development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area There is a potential for significant short term impacts to the storm drains from uncontrolled accumulation of silt in the runoff from development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The improvements proposed within the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area for the drainage areas identified as having deficient pipe capacity are described below Prooosed ImDrovements Identified in the Master Plan Dr DraiD82e for the South Central Area Area 18 Southern areas and pipes of the West Anaheim Storm Drain WASD will be diverted to Anaheim Barber City Channel ABCC along Ball Road in exchange for an equivalent area of the ABCC south ofthe 1 5 and nonh of South Street being diverted to the shortened WASD Extensions to the Lincoln Avenue and Santa Ana Street storm drains are proposed to reduce the street flooding below the 17 feet flood width limit in the streets The WASD s terminus will be at South Street to accommodate the widening profile changes of the 1 5 Freeway the design of the 1 5 Freeway at South Street puts the freeway 15 feet lower than the existing condition An extension to the South Street storm drain is included to reduce the street flooding below the 17 feet flood width limit as well as the exchange of tributary areas between the Anaheim Barber City Channel and the Carbon Creek ChanneL Area 19 Proposed improvements to Area 19 include a relief drain in Vermont Avenue to relieve the South Street storm drain The relief drain will convey runoff from those areas east of East Street to CRAICRA 3 9 3 9 60 Public Services and Utilities 01747 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plnn EJR e Vermont Avenue The drain will flow west on Vermont Avenue to Harbor Boulevard where it will turn south on Harbor Boulevard to Ball Road and join the proposed Ball Road storm drain In addition to the relief drain extensions of the existing storm drains in Vermont Avenue Santa Ana Street and South Street are recommended to reduce flooding to the 17 foot limit in arterial highways Area 20 To relieve potential flooding in Ball Road a parallel storm drain is proposed The first section of storm drain would extend from the ABC Channel to Harbor Boulevard where the relief drain from Area 19 will tie in From Harbor Boulevard to East Street the storm drain is on the south side and ties into the existing storm drain on the south side at Harbor Boulevard The widening of 1 5 would not have a significant impact on the Ball Road drainage pattern Any minor alterations in drainage patterns would occur within the 1 5 right of way and will be addressed by Caltrans at the time of freeway design The existing and proposed Ball Road storm drain will have to be protected and or reconstructed with the 1 5 widening Area 2I Improvements to Area 2I are proposed to include a parallel storm drain in Cerritos Avenue and West Street The existing undersized pipe on Walnut Street will be removed and the storm drain will be connected to the parallel drain on Cerritos Avenue The parallel storm drain in West Street will extend up to Winston Road to relieve the storm drain in Winston Road The storm drain in Walnut Street is proposed to be extended to meet the City s 17 foot flooded width criteria The storm drain in Cerritos Avenue was sized based On the assumption that flows between Walnut Street and West Street will drain to Cerritos Avenue via the storm drain outlined in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area 22 A parallel storm drain in Katella Avenue is required from Harbor Boulevard east to Haster Street north on Haster Street and Anaheim Boulevard to Cerritos Avenue In addition a parallel storm drain on Harbor Boulevard will also be necessary This storm drain will begin at Katella Avenue and turn east on Manchester Avenue cross the freeway and pick up flow on Midway Drive 1 1 T 11 rtA r b J b lt d 5 hr w 1 b i t j d CJr JJlf vlU J l C c 1d 1 t L r t y Iv rJ UYl t t fc f e e 1A S Mr 1 r Or ct Area 24 Parallel or upgrade storm drain lines in West Street to the Haster Basin are required The storm drain terminates at Convention Way and Harbor Boulevard as it then proceeds westerly along Convention Way to West Street thence southerly in West Street to Orangewood Avenue thence easterly along Orangewood Avenue to Harbor Boulevard thence southerly down Harbor Boulevard to Chapman Avenue thence easterly along Chapman Avenue to the Oertley Storm Drain and thence southerly to Haster Basin e CRAJCRA 3 9 3 9 61 Public Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Area 25 To relieve the current projected discharge deficiencies of the Oertley Storm Drain a relief drain in Haster Street is proposed This storm drain extends from the Spinnaker Storm Drain at r J c o rh e 5roJ rARr s Lampson Avenue northerly turning easterly along Gene Autry and ending at te Callege of a Qule ird In addition laterals are proposed at Wilken Way and Chapman Avenue to reduce the street flooding below the 17 feet flood width limit includes the sump condition in Wilken Way p uaJlel UQrm sraiB is J3r3pv aiVlJ Ol411C wuud Aveuut i lL WesL hneL v Hl11bu Bau ley8 fB to istereel t tin 3 HII araifl3 iA V est Street mnniRg BSFtA te CS8 cnti6ft VIray theH 8 8 lth@rly on J larp9T ReHle MB heRGe tlYt rly nn rh pman AvemlP tn thp PYitting Oertley StenD Drain 3 9 8 3 Miti2ation Measures r ui or Miti2ation Measure 3 981 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of aA6uilding 11te pr f rtrO r d tl ar permit whichever occurs first aU Rew aevelepmeRt and r reEle eleJ3meat prQjec W ithin the Alld m R u l Slc olnc Plan alt a shall panicipate in the City s Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement Fee Program to assist in mitigating existing and future lIIlilary storm drainage system deficiencies as follows The property owner developer shall submit a report for review and approval by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following a If the specific proj developmentredevelopment prapafiell does not increase or redirect current or historic storm water quantities flows then the property owner s developer s responsibility shall be limited to panicipation in the Infrastructure Improvement Fee Program to provide storm drainage facilities in 10 and 25 year storm frequencies and to protect properties structures for a lOOyear storm frequency b Ifthe specific1 8 ieet developmentredevelopment increases or redirects the current or historic storm water then the property owner developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Atto s office iell r C nr u cofthe im lPrJ t apf val of a final subdiVISIon map or Issuance of butld1ng permit pursuant to the Improvements identified in the Master Plan ofDrainage for the South Central Area The property owner developer shall be required to install the storm drainage facilities as recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for 10 and 25 year storm frequencies and to protect properties structures for a IOOyear storm frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements br t 9X cpr final building and zoning inspection for the building structur 1tdiuonally the property owner developer shall panicipate in the Infrastructure Improvement Fee Program as determined by the City Engineer which include fees credits jJ reimbursements or a combination thereo pan ofguaranteeing the mitigation of impacts on the storm drainage system a st8mge drainage system improvement phasing plan for the project eRAeRA 9 3 9 62 Public Services and Utilities e 0 5 o ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e shall be submitted by the property owner developer to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall contain at a minimum I a layout of the complete system 2 all facility sizes including support calculations 3 construction phasing and 4 construction estimates 3 9 8 4 Si nificant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Implementation ofthe storm drain system improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for l 0tU OO f I the South Central Area will mitigate potential impacts related to implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3 9 9 ELECTRICITY This section is an evaluation of the Anaheim Resort project impacts related to electrical use and other utilities The Disneyland Resort Utility Report psomas Associates 1992 which includes analysis of the entire Anaheim Resort is summarized herein as well as the 1992 Electric System Forecast City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department 1992 are incorporated by reference into this analysis For the purposes ofYear 2010 analysis it is assumed that the recommendations for improvements and 0 1 rv r be e eS r mitigation measures identified in the Utility Report will be implemente41 These include Construction of a 120 million volt amperes MVA substation and transmission line to serve the proposed Disneyland Resort and existing Disneyland Park and Hotel The substation will supply power to all Disney faciliti e u 5001 roe v l e o Construction of a new IODMVA Katella Substation to replace the 6OMVA Katella Substation to be removed when 1 5 is widen c l S s I Scheduled expansion of the Southwest Substation located on Ninth Street north of Katella Avenue I fIC 1 ed n 1 6 11 t 1 Z StT Ct iL c r otp d s Implementation of recommended energy conservation measures ytlt e 3 9 9 1 Environmental Conditions Regional Setting The City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department provides electrical services to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The Public Utilities Board advises the City Council on public utility matters e CRAiCRA 3 9 3 9 63 Public Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Primary power supply comes from the San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant and from the Intermountain Power Plant in Utah via the Southern California Edison SCE network A combustion turbine generator located at Dowling Substation supplies anadditional 50 megawatts for peaking requirements Anaheim s main receiving substation is located on Lewis Street east of 1 5 The existing facilities currently provide adequate service to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Local Setting The Specific Plan area is currently served by the 40 MVA Southwest Substation located on Ninth Street north of Katella Avenue and the 6O MVA Katella Substation at the intersection of 1 5 and Anaheim Boulevard It is anticipated that the Katella Substation will be demolished and replaced with the Caltrans 1 5 widening project discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation As part of the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan a new IOO MVA Katella Substation will be constructed at the corner of Claudina and Katella Avenue This will be completed in coordination r pcV v with the 1 5 widening The Katella Substation improvement would be capable of servicing the proposed Year 2010 growth in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area As part of the City of Anaheim s 5 Year Underground Conversion Program the City has approved undergrounding all ofthe existing and future utilities 69 kV and 12 kV transmission and distribution systems communication systems telephone CATV and associated facilities in four phases on Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard and West Street in the Anaheim Resort Phase I of the Underground Conversion Program Harbor Boulevard and West Street south of Katella Avenue is complete Phase II Harbor Boulevard north of Katella Avenue and Freedman Way is under construction Completion of Phase II is anticipated in April 1994 Phase III Katella Avenue Haster Street to west of West Street is on hold and Phase IV West Street between Katella Avenue and Ball Road is scheduled for construction in June 1997 The existing hotels within the Specific Plan area consume an average of 87 953 kWh on an annual bases Electric and Ma2netic Fields Research conducted over the past decade has raised much debate over the health effects associated with electric and magnetic fields typically referred to as electromagnetic fields EMF Electric fields are produced in electrical lines as a result ofvoltage applied to wiring and is measured in volts per meter V1m or kilovolts per meter kV1m Electric field strength falls off dramatically with distance and many objects including trees and houses shield these fields Most exposure to residential electric fields is a result of internal household appliance use Magnetic fields are a result of the movement 01751 eRAeRA 9 3 9 64 Public Sel1lices and Utilities e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e current ofelectricity These fields are measured in Gauss however this measure is extremely large and fields from electrical lines are generally referred to in milligauss mG As with electric fields magnetic field strength decreases dramatically with distance from the source however magnetic fields are not shielded by objects such as trees and buildings Bailey Research Associates 1992 Exposure to electromagnetic fields is an existing circumstance that is typical in urban communities including Anaheim and the intensity of EMF varies with the type of electricity source Whether the fields are originating from household appliances or high voltage transmission lines public and scientific concern exists regarding the health effects resulting from exposure The relationship between EMF exposure and health effects has not been scientifically proven results from the plethora of epidemiological and laboratory studies that have taken place are inconclusive Scientists for SCE as well as most scientists to date have found no threshold value no dose response or no causative relationship that demonstrates evidence of any physical effects from EMF 3 9 9 2 Environmental ImDacts Electrical Consumption Full implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will increase the demand for electricity by approximately 249 208 000 kWh annually and an estimated 683 000 kWh on an average day refer to Table 3 9 19 by 2010 The estimated net increase in electrical demand associated with implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is 82 5 MVA The available sources for power supply are from the proposed expansion to the Southwest Substation the new lOO MVA Katella Substation and the 120 MVA Substation identified in the Utility Report The City s electrical supply will be capable of meeting the total estimated additional demand generated by implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Electric and Ma2netic Fields The gas insulated substation does not contain high voltage air insulated equipment by design Due to the fact that all the equipment is metal encased and grounded there are no external electric fields emanating from the substation The steel metal clad enclosures of all the substation s high voltage equipment also serve to reduce magnetic field emissions EMF levels at the perimeter of the substation are anticipated to be nominal e CRAiCRA J 9 3 9 i5 Public Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR TABLE 3 919 PROJECTED ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION YEAR 2010 Proposed Annual Area Load Consumption Component s f kWh s f yr kWh 16 318 Hotel Rooms 7 832 640 13 1 102 608 000 Restaurant 979 080 44 6 43 667 000 Retail 979 080 15 3 14 980 000 Project Net Increase fotal 161 254 000 Existing 11 190 hotel rooms 6 714 000 13 1 87 953 000 Year 2010 Total 249 208 000 Annual Consumption Total Average Daily Consumption 683 000 Load Total Area Volt Demand Component s f amp s f Volt amp 16 318 Hotel Rooms 7 832 640 5 39 163 Restaurant 979 080 5 4 895 Retail 979 080 5 4 895 Project Net Increase 48 954 Existing 11 190 Hotel Rooms 6 714 000 5 33 570 Total Demand 82 524 825 MV A Note All values are rounded to the nearest 1 000 kWh Psomas Associates 1992 Assumes 600 square feet per room per City of Anaheim February 1994 Assumes approximately 20 percent of the total hotel motel room square footage may be devoted to accessory uses 10 percent retail IO percent restaurant80 percent hotel motel d Average Daily demand is annual demand 365 Source MBA 1994 CRAlCRA 3 9 3 9 Public Services and Utilities e e 01753 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e As a result of the inconclusive findings from research in the area of EMF a determination of significance related to the health effects resulting from exposure to EMF can not reasonably be made There are no applicable municipal regional or statewide policies currently in place which attempt to limit EMF exposure however the action to underground or enclosed electrical lines associated with the proposed project is in accordance with EMF consensus recommendations which authorize utilities companies to implement no or low cost steps to reduce field exposure Undergrounding or enclosing electrical systems is considered at this time to be one of the most feasible actions to reduce EMF exposure levels 3 9 9 3 Mitilation Measures Mitilation Measure 3 991 Prior to issuance of each building permit the property owner developer shall submit plans showing that each structure will comply with the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings Title 24 Part 6 Anicle 2 California Code of Regulations and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Resource Efficiency Division in order to review above Title 24 measures prigr te eaeh hu41 b lileliBg ami z8Rieg iqiPe tiQJ to incorporate into the project design including energy efficient designs o1 ov i u eG Gnv1 l titi2ation lfeasure 3 992 1ft enler to eS83erH U15Y 11 11 tv 1000UQJ J I i vC t b ildi8g permit the property owner developer shall implement energy saving practices in compliance with Title M41 which may include the following Use of high fficiency air conditioning systems controlled by a computerized management system including features such as a variable air volume system a lOO percent outdoor air economizer cycle sequential operation of air conditioning equipment in accordance with building demands isolation of air conditioning to any selected floor or floors Use of electric motors designed to conserve energy Use of special lighting fixtures such as motion sensing devices and compact fluorescent fixtures in place of incandescent lights Use ofT8 lamps and electronic ballasts Metal hallide or high pressure sodium for outdoor lighting and parking lots e Mitilation Measure 3 9 93 Prior to issuance of each building permit for any buildings requiring a change in electrical service the property owner developer shall install an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules Rates Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground CRAiCRA 9 3 9 67 Public Services and Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Systems Electrical Service Fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules Rates Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems IIlSt vf J4 r jl ht tIl e 3 9 9 1 A 41dll s o ftv ft Oldj 3 9 9 4 Silnificant Unavoidable Adverse ImDacts Implementation of the mitigation measures listed above will reduce the impact on electrical service to a level considered less than significant 3 9 10 NATURAL GAS SERVICE The Disneyland Resort EIR includes The Disneyland Resort Utility Report psomas Associates 1992 Included in this technical report is an evaluation of the Anaheim Resort area project impacts related to natural gas use and other utilities This Utility Report as summarized herein is incorporated by reference into this analysis For the purposes of Year 2010 analysis it is assumed that the recommendations for improvements and mitigation measures identified in the Utility Report will be implemented These include Southern California Gas Company SCG will modify the system as necess lry to meet the specific requirements offuture development The existing SCG distribution system will be capable of supplying the estimated demand Implementation of recommended energy conservation measures 3 9 10 1 Environmental Conditions Regional Setting The SCG provides gas service to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area through existing gas service pipes which range in size from 2 inches to 103 4 inches and operate at 40 pounds per square inch psi distribution pressure LocaI Setting Existing uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are provided natural gas by the Southern California Gas Company and currently consume approximately 386 726 MBTV annually and 1 060 MBTV daily 01755 CRAiCRA 9 3 9 8 Public Services and Utilities e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Insert for Page 3 Y 68 new mitigation meJsure 1itiQation Measure 3 9 9 4 Prior Q installation of any transformers the property owner developer shall submit evidence to the Utilities Department Electrical Engineering Division that the transformers are PCB free ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 9 10 2 Environmental Impacts Future development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will increase the demand for energy from natural gas The demand for natural gas was estimated for future developments in the Anaheim Resort based on demand factors associated with the hotel motel land use designations proposed within the Specific Plan as well as accessory uses such as restaurants and commercial retail use refer to Table 3 9 20 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is estimated to consume an additional 508 730 million British Thermal Units MBTU annually or 1 394 MBTU daily TABLE 3 920 PROJECTED NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION YEAR 2010 Proposed Natural Area Load Gas Consumption Component s f cf sJ lyr MBTU year 16 318 hotel rooms 7 832 640 57 6 451 160 Restaurant 979 080 24 23 498 Retail 979 080 34 8 34 072 Project Net Increase 508 730 Existing 11 190 hotel rooms 6 714 000 57 6 386 726 Year 2010 Total Consumption 895 456 Total Average Daily Consumption 2010 2 453 Psomas AssociateS 1992 Assumes 600 square feet per room per City of Anaheim February 1994 Assumes approximately 20 percent of the hotel motel room square footage may be devoted to accessory uses 10 percent retail 1 0 percent restaurant80 percent rooms Average daily demand is annual demand 365 Source MBA 1994 Gas service will be added to the existing system by SCG as necessary to meet the requirements of individual development projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area SCG has indicated that it will be able to supply the Specific Plan area with natural gas without impacting existing service CRAiCRA 9 3 9 69 Public Services and Utilities 01757 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 9 10 3 Miti2ation Measures Miti28tioR f QC IU o 9 19 1 Prior to i UdW V t i11i building permit du prupeny owm l dcvdupcr iball s1 I13m it 151fHl fgr reie ana 8ffre aJ whidl shall ef u dlc1l buildillo aJ 1I UUfVIIUal1ce n ith tPP 4i t te CU 16J C6R3efl ati6ft Stansareg far NQni fj io nti l Rllil iltBS Title 24 Part 6 Article 2 Calif eraia Aamini3llat vc Cudt I Miti2ationMeasure 3 9 10 The Southern California Gas Company has developed several programs which are intended to assist in the selection of the most energy efficient water heaters and furnaces The property owner developer shall implement a program as required to reduce the demand on natural gas supplies prior to each final building and zoning inspection 3 9 10 4 Si2nificant Unavoidable Adverse ImDacts The Southern California Gas Company has indicated that they will be capable of meeting the energy needs of the future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area without adverse impacts on surrounding uses No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated 3 9 11 TELEPHONE SERVICE 3 9 11 1 Environmental Conditions Pacific Bell Telephone Company pacific Bell provides telephone service to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area via underground conduits and above grade pole lines Major underground telephone conduits which serve the existing Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are located on Harbor Boulevard and Walnut Street On Walnut Street between Ball Road and Cerritos Avenue the telephone lines are aerial and the poles belong to Pacific Bell There are also aerial service lines on West Street Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue The City has a program to underground utilities in Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard and West Street All existing and future telephone lines within the public way will eventually be located underground per the City of Anaheim 5 year Capital Improvement Program CIP Pacific Bell can provide fiber optics to facilitate high capacity digital service There are existing fiber optic services in Harbor Boulevard and if needed Pacific Bell can extend this service e eRA CRA 3 Q 3 9 70 01758 Public Services and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 9 11 2 Environmental ImDacts 12 ei t jeJs Implementation of the individual Iffl ieet within the Specific Plan area will increase demand on the telephone service system According to Pacific Bell it will be able to meet the needs of the project without impacting existing customer service There may be an increased demand for fiber optic service Fiber optic service will be useful for providing teleconferencing facilities for the hotels Telephone service will remain on standard copper wire U ndergrounding of existing overhead telephone lines extension of fiber optic service and other upgrading will be provided by Pacific Bell or any other communication provider as needed to serve future development developed within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area 3 9 11 3 Miti2ation Measures No mitigation measures are required 3 9i1 4 Si2nificant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No significant unavoidable impacts are anticipated 3 9 12 TELEVISION SERVlCElRECEPTION 3 9 12 1 Environmental Conditiom Broadcast television is provided by public stations throughout the Greater Los Angeles Metropolitan region Currently MultiVision Cable TV provides cable television service to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area 3 9 12 2 Future development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries would result in additional requests for cable television services particularly at hotels and restaurants During construction of street improvements eltisting cable television facilities will need to be relocated underground or otherwise redesigned in order to accommodate new accounts No adverse impacts on cable service to existing customers are anticipated CRAiCRA 9 3 9 71 Public Services and Utilities 01759 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- In e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Television reception of residents and businesses currently without cable television service might be negatively impacted by multi story hotels or other tall structures within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries if structures physically interfere with reception Mitilation Measure 3 9 121 Within 6 months after completion of building exteriors of new developments over 75 feet in height a study of area television reception shall be undertaken by the property owner developer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval Ifthe City of Anaheim determines that the proposed project creates a significant impact on broadcast television reception at local residences and other existing hotels restaurants or other businesses a signal booster or relay system shall be installed by the property owner developer immediately on the roof of the tallest project building to restore television reception to its original condition L 0 i v f 51 h 1j fs 1 11 S J Ph I 01 03J c An4k Y Yfvf e 7 1 o e lf J j j frt c fur i fI jll f L f fcfYI J 1 1 COrl lm rc I tlH I rf tf J J e prceecli d 3 9 12 4 Silnificant Unavoidable Adverse Imoacts With the implementation of the mitigation measure discussed above no significant adverse impacts on local television service reception will occur e 01760 3 9 72 Public Services and Utilities CRAfCRA 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 10 HAZARDOUSMATE SCOMPL CE 3 10 1 IloTRODUCTION To determine the presence of suspected or known hazardous waste contamination sites within the Specific Plan study area various governmental agency lists were reviewed CEQA requires the lead agency to consult the lists compiled by the State of California pursuant to Governmental Code Section 659625 some of which are still in the process of being compiled CEQA Cal Pub Resources Section 21092 6 Lists that were reviewed that are available under Section 656925 of the California Government Code include The California Environmental Protection Agency Department of Toxic Substances Control s DTSe s CAL Sites List the California Governor s Office Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List the California Department of Health Services DHS s Expenditure Plan for the Hazardous Substances Cleanup Bond Act Bond Expenditure Plan the State Water Resources Control Board s s Solid Waste Assessment Test SWAn List the California Regional Water Quality Control Board s s Underground Storage Tank Case List USTC and the California Solid Waste Management Board s List of Active Landfills Inactive Landfills and Transfer Stations The was also contacted regarding any Cease and Desist Orders or Cleanup and Abatement Orders within the Specific Plan area In addition to the State lists the following Federal lists were reviewed the EPA s National Priorities List NPL and Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System CERCLIS Where applicable the information contained in this section of the repon reflects information based on the final analysis presented in The Disneyland Reson Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical repon s referenced above has been updated verified and or validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR Analysis of the cumulative effects ofthe proposed project and other reasonably foreseeable development on hazardous materials compliance is provided in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts The most recent 1990 s Well Investigation Program List of Polluted Wells was reviewed for the study area as part ofthe Hatardous Materials Compliance investigation conducted by Dames Moore for The Disneyland Reson Specific Plan EIR Dames Moore 1992 Data for the List of Polluted Wells are obtained from the Orange County Water District OCWD According to the Dames and Moore Hatardous Materials Compliance Report OCWD files indicate that all wells within the Anaheim Reson meet state drinking water criteria Extending the radius to within 14 mile of the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan boundaries indicates that an agricultural supply well within the western ponion ofThe Disneyland Reson Specific Plan Area exceeds the state drinking water criteria CRAiCRA J 10 3 101 Hazardous MaJerials Compliance 01761 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e I ATU1heim Reson Specific Plan EIR for chloroform However this well is not used to provide drinking water to any facility including any future project within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and is therefore not considered to be subject to action by the The following is a summary of active known or suspected contamination sites identified by a review of public agency lists or through agency consultation within the Anaheim Resort boundaries The location of the sites are shown on Exhibit 3 10 1 and listed in Table 3 10 1 Sites that are listed but that are closed or require no further action are not included TABLE 3 101 LOCATION OF SITES INCLUDED ON AGENCY LISTS WITIUN A QUARTER MILE OF THE ANAHEIM RESORT No I NamelAddress I Identified by I Type of Contamination I California Chemical Company ASPIS Unknown 1772 S Haster Street 2 Arco Service Station 72 LUST Gasoline Fuel soil 1037 W Ball Road 3 Avis Rent a Car System LUST Diesel Fuel or Hydrocarbons 1400 S Harbor Blvd soil 4 Mobil Service Station 18 LUST Gasoline Fuel soil 1800 S Harbor Blvd 5 Shell Service Station LUST Gasoline Fuel soil 2100 S Harbor Blvd 6 Eagle Anaheim Car Wash LUST Gasoline Fuel soil 350 W Katella Ave Demolished vacant lot 7 Texaco Service Station LUST Gasoline Fuel soil 100 W Katella Ave 8 Mobil Service Station LUST Gasoline Fuel soil 100 E Katella Way 9 West StreetlDisneyland Drive Lubricating oil soil Strawberry farm LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank List ASPIS Abandoned Site Program Information System Department of Toxics Soil affected by oil is not included on agency list Source Dames Moore 1992 California EPA 1991 Validated 1994 e 01762 3 10 2 HazJ1rdous Materials Compliance CRA CRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Cerritos Avenue n I r D Soure D m nd Moor 111112 Califomi EPA 1991 Legend Olangowood A f Anaheim Raon 0 A is Rell locr ArcaBouncWy 1400 S Hubor BOulmrd Anaheim Raon 0 Mobil me S tio 118 Sp cific Pbn Bound ry 1800 S Hubor BouIMrd 0 c Jifomia 0lcmiaI Company Sh IIS lVictSari 1772 S H S 2100 S Hubor BooImd ARea Servie S io 172 0 fsfiI Anaheim crWash 1037 W Ball Road 3 Kaldla Ave o o o Tcuco S lVict Sari 100 W KasdlaA Mobil Service Sl2Don 100 E KasdIaWay W Sum SInWl my farm Exhibit 3 10 1 Location of Sites Included onAgency List Anaheim Resort Specific Plan E1Ra 3 103 mm Michad BrandllUtl Auoci 00550010 694 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e 3 10 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS The DTSC s CAL Sites List identifies one site within the project boundaries The location of the site California Chemical Company is listed on Table 3 10 1 and shown on Exhibit 3 10 1 According to a Hazardous Materials Compliance Report for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR Dames and Moore 1992 California Chemical Company is being evaluated for placement on the DHS s Bond Expenditure Plan a list of contamination sites targeted for cleanup by responsible parties The City of Anaheim subsequently requested and received information on the California Chemical Company site on file with the DTSC According to the siteprofile information this site was initially identified in 1961 via a telephone directory as a potential hazardous waste site as it manufactured chemicals However the lead agency was unable to locate the site during a drive by survey in 1982 The final entry 1987 in the site profile concluded that a further record search of past history of the site was needed The status of the site is listed as preliminary endangerment assessment reg low The s USTC list identifies seven sites within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan study are that are undergoing preliminary assessment or pollution characterization For those sites which will be undergoing preliminary assessment or pollution characterization no definite time has or will be listed by the for commencement of those actions These sites are listed on Table 3 10 1 and shown on Exhibit 3 10 I Six of the sites involve contamination of soil by gasoline fuel The remaining site involves contamination of soil by either diesel fuel or hydrocarbons Five ofthe sites are also listed on the Fonner USTs There is the potential that a UST may exist or may have existed within the 56acre parcel located in the southeast portion of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area for the storage of fuel for farm vehicles No records were found in agency files indicating the presence of USTs at this site Electrical Transfonners Transformers within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and throughout the Anaheim Resort are all owned by the City of Anaheim except the transformers at the vacant Riviera parcel within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area which are owned by the Southern California Edison Company SCE According to an SCE representative all SCE transformers located on private property currently do not contain PCBs above regulated limits City owned transformers in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area have been classified by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department as non PCB contains less than 50 ppm biphenyls PCBs e eRAeRA 10 3 16 4 Hazardous Marerials Compliance ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 10 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Soil contamination from leaking underground storage tanks is known to exist at seven sites within the proposed Specific Plan study area The type of contamination is listed in Table 3 10 1 Soil and potentially groundwater contamination associated with the sites listed on Table 3 10 1 may be encountered during grading excavation or construction activities associated with future development redevelopment of parcels within the Specific Plan area Ifcontamination levels at these sites in excess of federal state and local standards are encountered by unprotected construction workers or the public from the listed sites or from areas that were not known to be contaminated it would be a significant health impact However it should be noted that there are existing federal and state policies and procedures that require the delineation and remediation of hazardous waste sites to the satisfaction of the designated lead agency In addition it is unlikely that the contamination from these sites would be extensive or beyond the capabilities of typical remediation measures Implementation of the mitigation measures prescribed below would reduce health impacts associated with development of specific projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Fonner USTs It is possible that USTs may be present within the 56acre parcel located in the southeast portion of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Soil affected by TPH or other possible contaminants may exist in the areas ofthe former or existing tanks however there is no evidence to suggest this is the case In an effort to substantiate the presence or absence of significant soil contaminants an investigation using geophysical methods to evaluate the possible presence of tanks will be required Electrical Transronners Because no PCB transformers are expected to be impacted from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan no impacts are anticipated for electrical transformers 3 10 4 MITIGATION MEASURES I I Mitintion Measure i l0 4t Prior to approval of the first grading plan or issuance of the first demolition permit whichever occurs first the property owner developer shall retain the services of a qualified environmental professional to conduct an investigation for knoWlOr the presence tanks using geophysical methods in areas of former service stations in areas known or thought to CRAfCRAllO 3 10 5 01765 Hazardous MaJerials Compliance e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e have been formerly occupied by USTs and in areas where tank removal has not been verified prior to excavation or grading in these areas Soil sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required ifsoil sampling results are not available or indicate contamination is present above regulatory guidelines If warranted subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken in these areas and appropriate remediation measures developed if necessary before demolition excavation or grading takes place in these areas 3 P 2 Mili2alion Measure 3 19 4 J Prior to the removal of USTs the property owners developers shall obtain a permit from the Environmental Protection Section ofthe Fire Department for the removal of such tanks During the removal of USTs a representative from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department shall be onsite to direct soil sampling 1u 3 c lv Mili2alion Measure J 19 43 AII remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs conducted on behalf of the property owner developer shall be overseen by th Orange County Health Department Information on subsurface contamination from USTs shall be n x e r Se provided to the Pulllie Utilities Department Environmental Sef kl 3 SectiOR 1 I Mili2ation Measure 3 19 44 Prior to approval of the first grading plan or issuance of the first demolition permit whichever occurs first the property owner developer shall submit aplan for review and approval to the Environmental Protection Section ofthe Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if a previously unknown USTs or other unknown hazardous material or waste is discovered onsite J o r Mili2alion Measure 3 18 45 Prior to approval of the first grading plan or demolition permit whichever occurs first for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area affecting the California Chemical Company 1772 S Haster Street Area Service Station 1037 W Ball Road Avis Rent a Car System 1400 S Harbor Blvd Mobile Service Station 1800 S Harbor Blvd Site fforn ISI AIld Car WlI5h JS9 W Kalllla A 811118 Shell Service Station 2100 S Harbor Blvd Texaco Service Station 100 W Katella Avenue and Mobil Service Station 100 E Katella Way aqualified environmental professional retained by the property owner developer shall attempt to contact the current and or known former property business owners to obtain information regarding the status of USTs and or tank closures at these sites If warranted subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional and results of these analyses shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval Appropriate remediation measures will be developed if necessary before demolition excavation or grading take place in these areas e 3 106 HazJ Udous Marerials Compliance CRACRA 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Ie p Mitieation Measure 3 19 46 Prior to approval of the first grading plan or issuance of an excavation permit whichever comes first several representative samples of shallow soils shall be collected and aqv4 h i e I lNle flr e5 I l analyzed bX the property owner developer for pesticide and herbicide residue on the 56 acre parcel located in the southeast portion of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area If soils containing pesticides or herbicides above regulated limits are found remedial actions shall be carried out before any disturbance to the soils occurs Remedial actions should consist of removal and disposal or treatment of affected soils according to all applicable local state and federal regulations 10 7 Mitieation Measure 3 19 4 7 Ongoing during demolition and construction in the event that hazardous waste including asbestos is discovered during site preparation or construction the property owner developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law Health and Safety Code Division 20 Chapter 6 5 and according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code Title 30 Chapter 22 3 10 4 SIGNIF1CANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS Implementation of mitigation measures will reduce the hazardous materials human health impacts to a level less than significant 01767 CRACRAJ10 3 10 7 H rdous Materials Compliance e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e 3 11 VISUAL RESOURCES AND AESTHETICS This section addresses the potential impacts related to the changes in visual conditions as a result of implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Visual effects are also discussed in Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility Analysis of the cumulative effects of the proposed project and other reasonably foreseeable development on visual resources and aesthetics is provided in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts 3 11 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 3 11 11 Visual Settine The approximately 5495 acre Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is within a sector of relatively flat topography in the southern portion of the City of Anaheim Most structures within the project area are one to three stories tall but there are several taller structures primarily hotels There are existing height limitations that apply to the project area and surrounding areas As discussed in Section 3 1 Land Use Related Plans and Policies the current C R Zoning regulation Anaheim Municipal Code 18 48 082 allows a maximum structural height of 75 feet by right and allows property owners to obtain approvals for greater heights subject to a conditional use permit CUP up to the maximum shown on the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Maximum Permitted Structural Height Map In addition to height limitations landscape and building setbacks currently apply to the project area Pursuant to the existing C R Zoning regulations the minimum landscape and building setbacks along major arterials such as Katella Avenue Ball Road Orangewood Avenue Clementine Street Convention Way Freedman Way Haster Street Manchester Avenue West Street and Walnut Street are 30 feet Harbor Boulevard is an exception to these major arterials with a minimum setback of evri 1 r 20 feet For local streets such as reet the setback is 10 feet if the building is less than three stories over three stories the minimum setback is 30 feet Setbacks along 1 5 and adjacent to interior property lines ahutting commercial uses are 10 feet The C R Zone additionally requires a minimum 20 foot wide landscape area adjacent to an interior property line when the interior property line is within 150 feel of a residential lone The variety and intensity of existing land uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and surrounding areas create a setting that is predominately urban in character interspersed with undeveloped areas some used for agricultural purposes There are no distinct natural landscape e eRA CRA 311 3 11 1 Visual Resources and Aesthetics ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resol1 Specific Plnn EIR features or natural visual resources or vistas within the project area Refer to Section 3 2 Land Use Compatibility for a detailed description of existing land uses within and around the project area Typically major arterial streetscapes Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard within the project area are dominated by prominent commercial signage overhead utility lines minimal landscaping varied architecture styles and limited indistinct pedestrian areas There is currently little coordination of design themes signage or streetscape appearance on the streets within the Specific Plan area However isolated areas of theme oriented landscaping do exist along the periphery of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area adjacent to portions of Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and West Street Photographs were taken to represent the visual conditions within and around the project area Exhibit 3 II I Photograph Location map provides a graphic illustration of the location of where photographs were taken within and at the fringe of he project area and depicts the view direction of b the photograph Exhibits 3 11 IX through 3 11 IJC Project area Photographs show the identified areas Due to the urbanized setting night lighting is widespread throughout the project area which adds to the ambient light within the Anaheim area Night lighting consists primarily ofstreet lighting parking lot lighting and signlbuilding illumination The intensity of direct lighting is substantially reduced within the undeveloped and residential areas near the project area Existing ambient sources of night time lighting within the project area are characterized by neon and fluorescent signage of adjacent commercial and retail land uses parking lot lighting existing Disneyland parking lot structural lighting for hotels motels and restaurants overhead street lighting along adjacent roadways and lighting from vehicle headlights 3 1112 Existill2 Views Due to the intensity ofexisting development and flat topography characteristic of the project area ground level views of the project area are limited to short distances and are usually confined within roadway corridors except in agricultural or undeveloped areas Several ofthe tallest structures within or near the project area are visible within the background farthest from viewer of most views while overhead powerlines are visible within the foreground nearest the viewer or middleground intermediate to viewer from most views 01769 eRAeRA 311 3 11 2 Visual Resources and Aesthetics e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e r Z r Ball Road I m il T ra 1 1 I 1 1 II 11 II ii I e I l l HLi i II 1 2 A ej u m e 1 toJ iil n I ft p I @ n i 1 DO i L 0 J I 1 I I r Freedman Way i 1 Ii I L I 1 i T i i 1 i i H rmJ Cl Kalella Way O Kal laAv UT t l 5 r L I CJi J jj r I 0 c 0 J n I Gi g en V5 c C I I tI 1 t I Z 0 i g nventlo Iay iI L f l Ball Road I Legend Orangewood Avenue 1 1 Anaheim Resort Boundary Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary t I Direction of Phorograph Views tCIlf I Irdt Michael Brandm m Associatcs Exhibit 3 11 1 Photograph Location Map Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 005500 0 694 3 11 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- e Legend Orangewood Avenue Anaheim Resort Boundary Anaheim Resort Spcciiic Plan Area Direction ofPhotograph Views 00550010 8 94 Exhibit 3 11 1 Photograph Location Map Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e Ililllillli I lich d to ---PAGE BREAK--- LL O e e e i iil it ill v l s s So I 3s tr I o rtn M C tT1 12 rU o tw ocr 0 C a 5 0r ro 3Jlro o C C ro 0tl W m is ---PAGE BREAK--- Location C Wm tid Harbor Boul vard looking north Location D ElUt sitU Harbor Bouuvard looking north 3 11 5 Exhibit 3 11 1 cd Project Area Photographs Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIRe Mm tichad Br mdman Associates 005500 0 694 ---PAGE BREAK--- vLL O e e r g litit O 9 or t L t t 0 El l 0 I g iitr g c 0 o o nnM r 3 JJ n t I1 o Or 6 C 0 Cll M g 0 qL 1J L Cl l O A r tD 0 v ---PAGE BREAK--- SLL O 8 o 1 t S t e E L r 1 t l 1 t ii o 1n gl3 0 1 tTl e 0 rS o e 0 0 04rcc 0 T ---PAGE BREAK--- e Localion Kartlfa Avmut looking tall e 00550010 694 Exhibit 3 11 1 i Project Area Photographs Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR nm Mich 1 Assoo 3 11 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 11 13 Shade and Shadow In general the cast of shadows on adjacent properties from structures currently located within the Specific Plan area is confined to limited locations Shadows originating from existing tall structures within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area do not presently extend onto residential uses located on the periphery of the Specific Plan area 3 11 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 3 11 2 1 Overview of Soecific Plan Desilm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan deBS Rat prepese llIIY mane develepHleRI5 btlt ralll8l is intended to provide guidance and consistency for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Ultimately development within the specific plan area will indirectly result in the intensification of the urban and commercial recreation character of the project area Refer to Section 2 0 Projec Description for a detailed description of the proposed land uses within the project area This intensification of the area s character is consistent with the Commercial Recreation designation under the City s General Plan as discussed in Section 31 Land Use Related Plans and Policies However portions of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are located along the perimeters of the Anaheim Resort thus portions ofthe border of the project area form a visual interface between the proposed commercial recreation uses and the surrounding areas including residential areas The juxtaposition ofthe different land uses although contemplated by the City ofAnaheim s General Plan creates the potential for visual impacts to the surrounding areas Approximately 56 acres in the southeastern portion of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is currently prime farmland and designated as an agricultural preserve Development anticipated for this area includes medium density hotel uses or theme park uses allowed with a conditional use permit Any development or land use within this area will be subject to the standards and design guidelines set forth in the Specific Plan While specific development details of future developments within the area are not yet known there is the potential for significant visual impacts to the residential properties adjacent to this area To evaluate the impacts ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan it is necessary to understand the design elements and standards proposed in the Specific Plan The following discussion describes the aspects of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan which may modify the visual characteristics of the area eRACRA II 3 11 9 Visual Resources and Aeslhetics 01777 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 11 2 2 The Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan contains a design plan that is intended to visually unify the project area Refer to Section 5 0 Design Plan of the Specific Plan document The primary objectives of the design program are Create visual continuity between the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area Create a high quality visually appealing pedestrian oriented environment and Create landscape and design standards and regulations to reinforce the area s unique identity The design plan describes basic design concepts that are intended to achieve these objectives It describes opportunities to transform and unify the area with landscape along the public rights of way to create settings of unique scale and form highlight distinct uses or areas of special interest and screenlbuffer views of service areas and mechanical equipment from the public right of way In addition the design plan proposes variations in landscape treatment for different streets with an emphasis on the central core at Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue The design plan also proposes treetscape improvements to be coordinated where possible with other area improvements such as the undergrounding of utilities As identified in the Design Plan Exhibits 3 11 2A through 3 1I 2D depict the proposed landscape design characteristics along Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and West StreetDisneyland Drive In addition design characteristics such as those depicted in Photographs A through C are proposed along other roadways within the Specific Plan Area The Design Plan proposes a design hierarchy which divides the planning area into three segments Public Realm Setback Realm and Private Realm based on the relative importance of each in achieving the Plan s goal in unifying the identity of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area e 01778 311 10 Visual Resources and Aesthetics eRA CRA ---PAGE BREAK--- J @o ro11lfmu r uiJes r o 005500 0 694 jI vb J vlrv d Exhibit3 11 rf View of Looking Anaheim Resort Specific Plan E Michael Br41ldman Associ cs 3 11 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- e 4 e is tVr T Lv JT f i L Li jji i 10 t v i Michad BrandmiUl Associ IHC5 Exhibit 3 11 2b View of Harbor Boulevard Looking North of Karella Avenue 00550010 694 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 11 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- r 00550010 694 Exhibit 3 11 2c View of Harbor Boulevard LookingSourh Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EI 3 11 13 Miducl Br mdman A s oci CS ---PAGE BREAK--- e z I Mm Michael B dman Aj KcIdt 1 v L Exhibit 3 11 2d View of LookingWest Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e 005500 0 694 3 11 14 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR eRAeRA 311 The Public Realm is the most visible and includes all of the area within the public right of way including public streets street medians parkways and sidewalks Landscape design concepts are described for each of the major streets within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area as well as for the major entry points into the Anaheim Resort Also provided are concepts for landscaping the major 1 5 interchanges within the Anaheim Resort to complement landscaping within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The Setback Realm includes the privately owned land located between the Public Realm and the Private Realm This area contains the minimum setbacks as required by the Specific Plan The intent of this Realm is to ensure compatibility between private development within this area and the improvements planned for the adjacent Public Realm Visually the primary roles of the Setback Realm will be to reduce the impact of mass and support and reinforce the design along the streets The minimum building setback will vary depending on the General Plan designation of the adjacent street and the height of the adjacent bUliclOg The width use and character of the setback areas will vary by location depending on the width of the street and character of adjacent uses For example within the central core along Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue the principal objective is to create a high qual ity pedestrian environment that reinforces the character established by the landscaping and other street elements contained in the Public Realm As such site planning guidelines will encourage pedestrian activity adjacent to the Public Realm For areas outside the central core pedestrian activity is not anticipated to be as high as in the central core therefore the setback area is oriented more towards landscaping The Private Realm includes all the privatelY Qwned property not included in the Setback Realm which is the developable area of a parcel and contains design guidelines and standards that are intended to help strengthen the overall quality and character of development in the Specific Plan area These standards and guidelines will ensure the high quality design in site planning building design landscape signage and lighting design n order to describe how the concepts identified in the Design Plan will be implemented the Specific Plan contains a Landscape Concept Plan an Identity Program and detailed descriptions of the proposed treatments ofthe Public Realm Setback Realm and Private Realm The contents of these elements are described below The Landscape Concept Plan describes specific landscape design concepts and principals which will guide landscape development activities within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The Concept Plan includes concept statements diagrams and cross sections intended to describe in a general way the basic landscape treatments An important landscape concept identified in the plan is to create a layered landscape by planting trees shrubs and ground covers in horizontal and vertical layers in order to increase the apparent depth of setbacks and the visibility ofthe landscape n addition the 3 11 15 Visual Resources and Aesthetics 01783 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Concept Plan also designates canopy and palm trees of various sizes to be used as the primary feature along roadways within the Specific Plan area The Identity Program plan includes entry gateways major directional signs bus shelters and other major street features to be coordinated in form color and overall placement in reinforcing the basic objectives of the Design Plan The description of the Public Realm Setback Realm and Private Realm within the Specific Plan contains detailed proposals for landscape treatments that demonstrate how the objectives of the Design Plan will be achieved Each proposal is described through the use of text cross sections and landscape plans In addition to the Design Plan a Streetscape Program is detailed in Vol 2A of the Specific Plan EIR The Streetscape Program is for street treatment within the public realm Standards and Guidelines The Design Plan contains numerous development standards and guidelines intended to enhance the visual quality of development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries The following is a sample of development standards and guidelines which would be implemented for each development project within the Anaheim Resort Area Specific Plan boundaries All service equipment Le utility equipment trash collection facilities etc service areas loading docks surface parking areas and outdoor storage areas will be located on the side or rear portions of buildings and will be screened from public view by landscaping berms and architecturally enhanced walls that complement the style and materials of surrounding buildings Rooftop mechanical and utility equipment will be screened from views from nearby tall buildings to the extent feasible Maximum sign area and sign illumination and maximum number of signs will be regulated by development standards as well as design guidelines included in the Specific Plan Landscaping guidelines and standards include requirements for the minimum size of plant material at installation the screening of parking areas and a plant palene of recommended plant materials In addition there are guidelines for pedestrian paving walls and fences irrigation and landscape maintenance 01784 CRA CRA3ll 3 11 16 Visual Resources and ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 11 2 3 Shade Shadow and Illumination Imoacts In as much as individual developments projects are not proposed with adoption of the Specific Plan exact impacts associated with individual proposals or locations cannot be determined at this time e c4 j L I v l Future developments WIll need to comply WIth the heIght regulatIons set fonh on the An ellR Resort Maximum Permitted Structural Height Map Specific project development within the Specific Plan area could change some adjacent property s exposure to the sun The effect on private properties cannot be determined prior to understanding a particular project proposal however because the Specific Plan does not propose any changes to the current building height development standards potential impacts would be no greater on adjacent properties than currently permitted under the existing Code Light from parking facilities hotels and other visitor serving uses will add to the illumination of the area at night Nighttime illumination ofbuildings pedestrian walkways parking areas and roadways internal to the project area will be used to highlight building design features emphasize prominent entrances and plazas and create a feeling of security The lighting specifications outlined in Section 5 75 of the Specific Plan and design landscaping will diminish light intrusion on surrounding residences and adjacent hotels No significant impacts generated by the continuation of nighttime illumination features are anticipated as the intent of the Specific Plan is to visually enhance the area through the various guidelines and standards described 3 11 2 4 Construction Imoacts Construction of future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will create visual disruption within the project area while proposed roadway and public infrastructure improvements are completed This will include removal ofsome landscaping grading demolition ofexisting structures completion of roadway improvements and other infrastructure and building construction 3 11 3 MITIGATION MEASURES Miti2ation Measure 3 11 1 Prior to issuance of each building permit the property owner developer shall submit plans to the Planning Department for review and approval which illustrate that all mechanical equipment and trash areas for the subject building s will be screened from adjacent public streets and adjacent residential areas Screening shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspection CRAiCRA J 11 3 11 17 Visual Resources and Aestherics 01785 e f ---PAGE BREAK--- e 4 i k e C k r Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Miti2ation Measure 3 11 2 Prior to issuance ofeach building permits the property owner developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Department This plan shall be prepared d by a licensed landscape architect The landscape plan shall include a phasing plan for the installation and maintenance of landscaping associated with that building permit and shall be in conformance with the Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance Adc 1 l t t f Vh CIl IVI ow Cr I t x r 4 I F 5 1 Miti2ation Measure 3 11 3 Prior to the submittal of each llYilding perrAit the property owner developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning Department for review and approval demonstrating that the proposed structure s would not create significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas e g eating areas along Harbor Boulevard hotel motel swimming pools and residential front and back yards or structures that include sensitive uses e g residences have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours If the analysis identifies shade and or shadow impacts would occur and the building setback architectural massing and landscape requirements provisions set forth in Section 5 0 Design Plan of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan do not function as feasible mitigation measures additional technical review of the structure s will be required Mitillation Measure 3 114 i9r ta tAe NaaJ bttilaiflg ans Z8RiRg iMP l Ou tile eV Rsreeleper shall par ti ifate 18 a l fItbeape 8S eURleRt md Jlu int onillce distriet if on is est1bliER99 fer the City sf A aahdm l Anaheim Res9rt Miti2ation Measure 3 11 5 Prior to issuance of each building pennit the property owner developer shall submit plans which detail the lighting system for any parking facilities adjacent to residential or light sensitive uses The systems shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal light sources to the extent feasible to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent uses The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer with a letter from the engineer stating that in the opinion of the engineer this requirement has been met 3 11 4 SIGNIF1CANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The project will have beneficial impacts on the area as a result ofthe extensive landscaping and design features However unavoidable adverse visual impacts and possible shade and shadow impacts could occur for property owners immediately adjacent to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area land uses No other significant impacts are anticipated 01786 CRACRA311 3 11 18 Visual Resources and ---PAGE BREAK--- Page 3 11 18 Add to end of MitiQarion Measure 3 11 2 The irrigation plan shall specify metbods for monitoring tbe irritation system The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do notexceed the inflitration of local soils tbat tbe applicarion of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies and that surface runoff and overwatering is minimized The landscape and irrigation plans shall include water conserving features sucb as low flow irrigation beads automatic irrigation scheduling equipment flow sensing controls rain sensors soil moisture sensors and other water conserving equipment In addition all irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly witb reclaimed water once a system is available Change Mitilation Measure 3 11 4 Prior to final building and zoning inspection or whenever established the property owner developer shall participate in the assessment district for landscape installation and maintennace if one is established for the Anaheim Resort Participation shall thereafter occur on an ongoing basis e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e 3 12 CULTURAL RESOURCES A record search for the Anaheim Reson area was prepared by the Cal ifornia Regional Archaeological Information Center at the UCLA Institute of Archaeology in May 199L This repon has undergone independent review and evaluation by the City of Anaheim staff and consultants The full repon is included in Appendix M to The Disneyland Reson EIR incorporated herein by reference and relevant ponions of the repon applicable to the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area are summarized below Where applicable the information contained in this section of the repon reflects information based on the final analysis presented in The Disneyland Reson Final EIR June 1993 Additionally the information incorporated from the technical repon s referenced above has been updated verified and or validated to reflect existing 1994 conditions As such the analysis tables and exhibits that follow represent the most current data available during the preparation of this EIR 3 12 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Cultural resources include fossils remains and artifacts from prehistoric civilizations historic structures and other antiquities The archaeological record search included a study area comprised of the Anaheim Reson The Center reviewed all recorded historic and prehistoric sites in the study area In addition historic maps on file at UCLA were reviewed for the study area The analysis identified no historic or prehistoric cultural resources in this area Seven archaeological surveys have been conducted within a I mile radius of the study area to locate and characterize cultural resources However these repons surveyed no part of the study area 3 12 1 Prehistoric Resources Prehistoric resources include fossils archaeologic and paleontologic remains and early Native American artifacts No prehistoric sites were identified within a I mile radius of the study area 3 12 12 Historic Resources Historic sites typically include European style agricultural rural or urban development Inspection of historic maps Anaheim 1896 and 1942 IS series indicates an urban area with structures and permanent roads in place as early as 1896 Much of the area was apparently used as orchards in 1942 e CRAJOA JI2 3 12 1 Cultural Resources ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR In 1991 a subcommittee at the Orange County Historic Commission met to determine whether the existing Disneyland theme park immediately adjacent to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area should be designated a County historic landmark No historic designation was made at that time and no future action was recommended 3 12 2 ENVlRONMENTALIMPACTS Past surveys have not uncovered any cultural historic or prehistoric resources according to the archaeological records search Implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would not cause any direct impacts Development of specific projects within the Specific Plan area is not anticipated to uncover any cultural historic or prehistoric resources Therefore no impact to these resources is expected from further development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area 3 12 3 MITIGATION MEASURES No impacts to cultural historic or prehistoric resources are anticipated however the following mitigation measures will be required of applicants for future developments within the Specific Plan area to minimize potential disturbance to as yet undiscovered resources that may be encountered during construction activity Mitilation Measure 3 12 1 Prior to approval of each grading plan the property owner developer shall submit a letter to the Public Department Development Division and the Planning Department Planning Division identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented a The archaeologist must be present at the pregrading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling identification and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner developer for exploration and or salvage b Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution c Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area 01789 CRA CRA 312 3 12 2 Cullural Resources e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e d A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer Upon completion of the grading the archaeologist shall notify the City to when the final report will be submitted Miti2ation Measure 3 12 2 Prior to approval of each grading plan the property owner developer shall submit a letter to the Public Works Engineering Department Development Division and the Planning Department Planning Division identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented a The paleontologist must be present at the pregrading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling identification and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered Ifartifacts are uncovered and found to be significant the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner developer for exploration and or salvage b Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donate to an appropriate educational or research institution c Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area d A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted Upon completion of the grading the paleontologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted 3 12 4 SIGNIFlCANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS Because no known cultural resources have been identified in the study area no adverse imp cts are anticipated However incorporation of the mitigation measures listed above will ensure potential indirect impacts of the project are mitigated to a less than significant level if any cultural resources are discovered during grading or development ofspecific projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area e 3 12 3 Cultural Resources CRAlCRA 312 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 13 ENERGY e Additional analysis of impacts associated with usage of electricity and natural gas is provided in Sections 3 9 9 Electricity and 3 9 10 Natural Gas Service 3 13 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDmONS Operation of existing hotel restaurant and retail services within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will result in the consumption of electricity and natural gas The Specific Plan area is served by the Southwest Substation located on Ninth Street north ofKatelIa Avenue and the KatelIa Substation located at 1 5 and Anaheim Boulevard It is anticipated that the KatelIa Substation will be demolished and replaced as part of the Caltrans 1 5 widening project discussed in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation The Southern California Gas Company provides gas service to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area through existing gas service pipelines ranging in size from 2 inches to 10 3 4 inches 3 13 Z ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan at 2010 will increase the demand for electricity by approximately 161 million kWh annually and 441 794 kWh daily refer to Table 3 9 by 2010 The City s electrical supply will be capable ofmeeting the electrical demand generated by the project Future development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries would increase the demand for energy from natural gas The demand for natural gas was estimated based on S ific Plan buildout in 2010 and demand factors for size and use ofthe facilities refer to Table 3 9jh Future developments in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will consume an additional 508 730 MBTU annually and 1 394 MBTU daily However Southern California Gas Company has indicated it will be able to supply the area with natural gas without impacting existing service 3 13 3 MITIGATION MEASURES Refer to Section 3 9 Public Services and Utilities for mitigation measures related to electricity Section 3 9 9 Electricity and natural gas Section 3 9 10 Natural Gas Service usage L 0 r Q 1 t t t S 3 3 Ir rTt 15 G T Q Q r e Jj 10 1 I 0 r r t 1 5 of C v j tr A d 6st r t c c yl S T ot Q c e Q e 1 i Crj oo lO lIld h 1 Jcj ct i Dn r Iw o I r n t r 3 13 1 Energy e CRA CRA 31J ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 3 13 4 SIGNIFICANr UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS Although the project will consume substantial amounts of energy electricity Section 3 9 9 Electricity and natural gas Section 3 9 10 Natural Gas Service the proposed usage is consistent with the assumed usage under approved plans and policies Implementation ofthe mitigation measures stated in Section 3 9 9 Electricity and Section 3 9 10 Natural Gas Service would reduce energy usage impacts to a level not considered significant e 01792 eRAeRA 3l3 3 13 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 3 14 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS This section summarizesconstruction impacts associated with future development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Construction impacts are generally considered to be short term and therefore not significant However for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan future development within the plan area including public infrastructure and roadway improvements associated with accommodating future growth within the area will result in construction activity potentially taking place continually over successive years 16 in all areas of the Specific Plan area For analysis purposes it is assumed that approximately 94 percent of construction will occur between years 2000 and 2010 Not all types of construction activities will occur at the same time many will occur sequentially Nor will construction activities be concentrated in anyone location within the Specific Plan Area for any extended period of time However the cumulative long term impact throughout the Specific Plan Area associated with construction over a 16 year period is considered a significant and unavoidable impact Therefore the following presents a summary of the potential effects associated with construction activities as identified throughout Section 3 0 of this EIR and to the extent feasible Analysis ofthe cumulative construction effects ofthe proposed Specific Plan and other reasonably foreseeable development is provided in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts of this EIR LAND USE PLANS AND POLICIES No construction related impacts are anticipated LAND USE COMPATIBILITY Long term construction impacts are related to roadway and infrastructure improvements traffic and circulation fugitive dust and exhaust emissions generated during grading and excavation activity air quality noise associated with operation ofconstruction equipment whenequipment operates adjacent to sensitive receptors and visual disruption llll will result in long term nuisance impacts to single family and mobilehome residences located along the periphery of the Specific Plan area Refer to Section 3 2 Land Use TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION The proposed project will result in significant impacts during construction phases related to disruption associated with transportation and other infrastructure improvements Intersection roadway and public infrastructure improvements will create short term impacts as each roadway segment and intersection is improved Improvements will be phased based on a construction phasing plan to minimize impacts eRACRA 31 3 141 Construction Impacts 01793 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e ATUlheim Reson Specific Plan EIR to surrounding areas Additionally vehicle trips associated with construction of future developments including employee trips truck deliveries dirt truck trip and demolition debris trips are anticipated to be significant Refer to Section 3 Transportation and Circulation AIR QUALITY Site preparation in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would produce two types of air contaminants 1 fugitive dust generated as a result of demolition and soil movement and 2 exhaust emissions from construction equipment and employee vehicles These construction impacts can be expected throughout development of the Specific Plan area Fugitive dust emissions and exhaust emissions from construction equipment and vehicles are analyzed to the extent feasible in Section 3 4 Air Quality of this EIR As noted in Section 3 4 paniculate emissions PMIO are significant Fugitive dust will be reduced by reasonable available control measures designed to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 These measures are specified in Section 3 4 3 ofthis ElK Additionally as noted in Section 3 4 of this EIR although equipment emissions during construction of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be lower than estimated as new controls are mandated on off road equipment total direct construction related emissions ofROG NOx SOx CO and PM 10 constitute a significant direct adverse impact without mitigation NOISE Construction noise will affect ambient noise levels on and around any construction site within the Specific Plan area as development occurs Noise generated by construction equipment including earth movers material handlers and portable generators can be as high as 85 dBA for residences at a distance of 100 feet from construction activity Due to the short term characteristics ofthe panicular construction activity that would cause residences in a local area to be exposed to relatively high short term noise it would not be considered a significant impact Prolonged high noise construction activities in a localized area are not anticipated for the proposed project Very high noise events such as blasting or pile driving are considered annoying but would not be significant impacts if they last only a short period of time DE tOLITION AND EARTIlWORK IMPACTS e It is anticipated that some existing uses within the project area may be demolished and that future development will result in the removal of some existing improvements excavation and grading At this time it is speculative to determine the quantity of the volume of earthwork that would be CRA CRAJI4 3 14 2 01794 Construction ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR generated by construction activity However mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed project as noted in Section 3 6 Earth Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity that will reduce any potential earthwork impacts to a level considered less than significant Because there are no grading plans associated with adoption of this Specific Plan the destination of any future exponed graded material cannot be determined The destination will be influenced by the precise date of grading in relation to other construction projects in the region which may need imponed soil However it is likely that the material would be exponed to a location within the Orange County area where it can be used as a fill or cover resource Truck hauling routes will be defined for grading contractors prior to the stan of excavation Routes will use major anerial streets Truck hauling in residential areas will be avoided Refer to the mitigation measures identified in Section 3 6 Earth Resources Geology Soils and Seismicity GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE HYDROWGY As noted in Section 3 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology during grading and construction activities there will be a potential for surface water runoff to carry sediment and small quantities of pollutants into the stormwater system Soil erosion may occur along project area boundaries during construction and in areas where temporary soil storage is required Soil erosion and small quantities of pollutants such as oil or other fluids used for construction may wash into the storm drain system During grading and until surface areas are paved or landscaped the future development sites within the project area will be subject to erosion and runoff during rains and high winds Because of the topography of the project area the potential for erosion is not significant However there is a potential for significant shon term impacts to the stormdrains from silt in the runoff from the area if uncontrolled Mitigation measures have been identified to reduce potential impacts to a level considered less than significant Refer to Section 3 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology POPULATION AND HOUSING e e The number ofconstructionjobs associated with buildout ofthe Specific Plan area cannot be quantified at this state of project development however as noted in Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing construction employees do not typically relocate for a project Although the phasing of the Specific Plan will take place over a period of 16 years most of the required trades will only be working for specific segments of the construction period for future individual developments n addition unemployment in the construction field is currently high There are many unemployed or underemployed construction workers in the region who would not have to relocate for project not fi h co t employment Construction employees are expected to have a cant Impact on ouslDg Refer to Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing CRA CIlA I 3 143 ConstrUction Impacts 01795 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR PUBLIC SERVICES AND UfILITIES Existing public service and utility capacities are adequate to bandle future development within the Specific Plan area through the Year 2000 Impacts are associated with expansion of public infrastructure and new facilities to accommodate Year 2010 development for water wastewater storm drainage and electrical transmission New facilities to be provided are discussed in detail in Section 3 9 Public Services and Utilities Solid waste generated by demolition cannot be quantified at this time but is anticipated to be significant due to limited landfill capacity Construction waste including scrap wood and metal empty materials containers and other construction debris will have to be disposed This material will have to be taken to landfills that accept construction materials or to infill sites where materials are needed At this time it is speculative to determine where the demolition material would be taken Disposal of demolition debris can be minimized by recycling material to the degree feasible and within the legal constraints For example concrete can be pulverized and beneficially used Refer to Section 3 9 Public Services and Utilities HAZARDOUS MATERIALS The potential impacts of primary concern regarding hazardous materials and waste during construction involve the identification and clean up of contaminated sites within the construction area The potential for exposure to contaminated soil during future development within the Specific Plan area is discussed in Section 3 10 Hazardous Materials Additionally construction activities involve the use of certain hazardous materials such as various solvents and are governed by a number of federal state and local laws and regulation Refer to Section 3 10 Hazardous Materials VISUAL IMPACTS Future development within the Specific Plan area will create visual disruption within the project area while proposed improvements are being completed This will include removal of some existing landscaping grading demolition ofexiting structures completion ofroadway and other infrastructure improvements and building construction Refer to Section 311 Visual Resources and Aesthetics ENERGY Energy will be consumed during development site preparation and for grading and construction operations Construction vehicles are usually diesel powered and are anticipated to be used during site preparation and construction phasing of future developments Construction equipment anticipated to be used includes but is not limited to the following air compressors concrete transit mixers 01796 CRA CRA 314 3 14 4 ConSTruction ---PAGE BREAK--- ATUlheim Reson Specific Plan EIR conveyers cranes curb builders finishers forklifts generators graders mixers pavers concrete pumps and other pumps rollers scrapers loaders tractors utility carts welders wheedled loaders wheedled tractors and saws Construction equipment fuel will be consumed at varying levels during the 16 year construction period of the Specific Plan and although cannot accurately be estimated would be expected to be consistent with typical energy usage for construction of urban projects n addition to construction vehicle and equipment fuel consumed within the project area fuel useJto haul excavated soil and demolished building materialSi I bring building materials to the area will occur Construction waste is also anticipated to be removed from the area Refer to Section 3 12 Energy Silmificance or Construction ImDacts The proposed Specific Plan sets fonh acomprehensive development program for a large area within the Anaheim Resortthat will facilitate the enhancement and revitalization ofthe project area Because of the length of time required to implement the public infrastructure and roadway improvements identified within the Specific Plan the size of the development area proximity of existing uses and the background environmental conditions of the urban location significant construction impacts associated with the implementation ofdevelopment under the guidance of the Specific Plan will occur These include truck trips disruptions associated with transportation and other infrastructure improvements including air quality emissions noise and visual disruption Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed project where feasible to minimize to the extent practicable the impacts to the residents and businesses in the area CRA CI A 314 3 145 ConsTrUction Impacts 01797 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e SECTION 4 0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS This section of the EIR analyzes the potential impacts of reasonably foreseeable growth in and around the Anaheim Resort including the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan CEQA defines cumulative impacts as two or more individual effects which when considered together are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts CEQA Guidelines Section 15355 Cumulative impacts only need be discussed when they are significant The analysis need not be as in depth as the project alone but should be guided by the standards of practicality and reasonableness CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 This analysis may be based on either of the following A list of past present and reasonably anticipated future developments producing related or cumulative impacts A summary of projections contained in an adopted general plan or related planning document designed to evaluate regional or areawide conditions For the purposes of analysis 100 percent of the hotel rooms were projected to be developed within the Specific Plan area by the year 2010 Environmental analysis is being conducted for the two thresholds of development year 2000 and year 2010 Any development past the 2010 time frame may require subsequent environmental documentation Because ofthe potential time lag between year 2000 development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and year 20I0 development a two tier analysis of future cumulative impacts is provided in this section where feasible and appropriate First for an analysis of the cumulative impacts that may be expected to occur by the year 2000 this EIR presents an analysis of the cumulative environmental impacts of past present and reasonably anticipated projects in conjunction with those associated with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The term related projects is used as a shorthand reference for the reasonahly anticipated projects producing related or cumulative impacts The master list ofrelated projects is presented in Table 41 List of Projects Assumed for Cumulative Impacts Year 2 00 For the analysis of certain impacts it is appropriate to consider regional planning documents or studies which provide projections regarding future development rather than specific project proposals that are under review The cited plans in this section are incorporated by reference into this document For example regional traffic projections are considered for cumulative traffic impacts 4 1 Cumulalive Impacts eRAeRA e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR as well as local traffic projects The specific sources of the planning projections are described below under the relevant environmental category TABLE 41 LIST OF PROJECTS ASSUMED FOR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS YEAR 2000 Office Retail Hotel Resid Misc Project Name Ift sq ft Rooms Unit sq ft Approved Projects 1 Full Service Car Wash 10 250 car wash 2 Stadium Park West SRO 208 3 KateU Avenue Hotel part of 384 Hotel Circle Phase I 4 Anaheim Hotel Complex 750 5 Coral Reef Resort 159b 6 King Henry s Feast 26 105 dinner the uer 7 Camelot 1M Suites 96 8 The Disneyland Resort 475 000 300 000 4 600 4 250 000 theme park 200 000 meeting roomsl convention ace 9 Stadium Business Park 1 519 200 41 900 400 40 000 health club 10 State CoUege Plaza 467 536 11 10M Busineos Center 384 667 7 000 12 Centnl Park TOWer 578 000 6 000 134 10 000 l C8taurant 13 Stadium Towers Plaza 270 000 21 395 17 030 restaurants 14 Anaheim Stadium Center 2 118 480 15 Metroceoter Phase III 24 430 16 Hanover KauUa Office Park 1 179 375 56 000 17 VoUeybalJ Club 39 000 club CRAlCRA 4 4 2 Cumulative lmpacls 01799 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Office Retail Hotel Resid Misc Project Name sq ft sq ft Rooms Unit sq ft Approved Projects Outside Anaheim 18 KoU Center Orange Phase II 1021 111 Projects in Process 19 Hotel Circle Specific Plan Phase II Atrium Court Hotel 150 Phase I1 Parkview Hotel 300 20 Anaheim Plaza Resort Hotel 236b 166 350 amusement 21 Q ZARlQZOO 17 040 amusement 22 Superstar Dragsters 68 000 amusement Related Projects totals 8 037 799 432 295 6 204 208 0 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Totals 1 005 43 145 Grand Totals 8 037 799 432 295 7 209 208 1 i gU Projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 0 Additional rooms to existing hotelmotel Source City of Anaheim December 27 1993 updated May 25 1994 q 700 3 I 4 43 775 In addition to the related projects listed in Table 4 1 several related transportation projects are considered in this analysis including the Katella Avenue Smart Street Harbor Boulevard Smart Street and 1 5 improvements The 1 5 improvements are scheduled to proceed within the same time frame as development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The improvements are described in Section 3 Transportation and Circulation The second tier ofthe cumulative impact analysis focuses on future development of the remainder of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area by the year 2010 where relevant local and regional growth impacts have also been considered The study area for the compilation of the related projects list as shown in Exhibit 41 is generally defined by Lincoln Avenue to the north Chapman Avenue to the south Euclid Street to the west and the Santa Ana River to the east The actual study area for each potential environmental impact JJ n 1101 5 d lIi l d b s d cd WI d l1r7s s r feo7r fJII d fCL e e G i ll II n ll 1 5vt CRAiCR A 4 43 CumulaJive Impacts e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Thus some study areas are larger than others For each potential impact the specific boundaries for the cumulative impact analysis are described within each topical discussion provided below 4 1 LAND USERELATED PLANS AND POLICIES 4 1 STUDY AREA This section addresses the related projects and theproposed project s consistency with plans policies and programs of the City of Anaheim and responsible agencies As such the study area is not considered except in the sense that each plan policy and program applies to a specific geographic area 4 12 YEAR 2000 The related projects shown in Table 4 1 and Exhibit 4 1 plus proposed related project development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would add approximately 7 209 new hotel and motel rooms 208 single room occupancy SRO residential units more than 8 0 million square feet ofoffice space 432 295 square feet of retail 26 105 theater seats 866 815 square feet ofmiscellaneous uses 1213 nS The majority of the developments considered in this analysis are of a nature and intensity generally consistent with guidelines set forth in the regional and local planning documents Implementation of the adopted Disneyland Resort one of the related projects will reduce prime agricultural land by approximately 24 acres Development ofthese acres will complete the conversion to urban uses which is consistent with adopted land use plans and policies for this area of the City The conversion of this farmland will contribute to a depletion of farmland in Orange County and the State of California The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project has been considered in the analysis ofother major projects in the area such as The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and Katella Smart Street Project These various plans are anticipated to support and implement important local and regional planning goals and policies and no significant planning incompatibilities are anticipated CRACRA 4 Cumulative Impacts 01801 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Cily cf Full rton j C IV 01 P aclr1lla State Route 91 Riverside F City of Al lIfIllm Ball pt Jenlle U1 CO BfOaQwa Santa Ana Street u m CD c m 0 m 3 0 0 m0 3 0 U Clementine Q iii Cerritcs Avenue 5ci Katella Avenue I Q iii Orangewood Avenue CityolAna l m g u w 6 J Cha man Avenue h J e ttO Cl Q i i 01 Not5u Legend Anaheim R son Specific Plan k 1 Anaheim R son 8ouod ty I 2 I Locarion of Rclarm PlOjeca Sourc City 01 Anaheim 1993 MBA Exhibit 4 1 Related Projects Location Map Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Michad e dnun Assoc r 005500 0 694 4S ---PAGE BREAK--- fFul er10n y 01 Ana elm Ball I Q iii Cerritos Avenue Katena Avenue Q iii Orangewood Avenue u o UJ Chaoman Avenue Legend Slate Route 91 Riverside Fwvl J rila e pJef Ue Ul co 1 6foadVJa Santa Ana Street ill C S o a OJ 1 lo V rlo0l 9 1 I 11 ill 3 o m 8 TO Disneyland Resort ill co s15 u Freedman Wy Clementine St ill iii 5 c 1 1 I I AnI ItiII 0 C rJl m e J C tyotAnatlI m tl J 110j j XottoS aU Anaheim Resort Specific Plw naheim Resort Boudolf Locmon of Rd ucd ProlectS Source City of Anaheim lQQ4 Michael Brandman Associates J I 1 h1d or AssOCl l tes 00550010 8 9 Exhibit 4 1 Related Projects Map Anaheim Resort Specific Plan E1a ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 4 1 3 YEAR 2010 The additional development that will occur within the Anaheim Reson by the year 20I 0 is expected to primarily consist of hotels restaurants and supponing retail uses Therefore for purposes of this analysis it is assumed that the future land uses proposed in the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan in conjunction with development of related projects would be consistent with the existing City of Anaheim General Plan and Regional Growth Management Plan and the other local and regional planning documents described in Section 3 I However the loss of 24 acres ofprime agricultural land within The Disneyland Reson and 56 acres within the Anaheim Reson is considered a significant cumulative impact Other than the loss of prime agricultural land no cumulative impacts are anticipated Cumulative impacts associated with other land use issues such as drainage traffic noise etc are discussed elsewhere in this section 4 2 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 2 1 STIJDY AREA The study area for land use compatibility is defined as the area up to approximately 0 25 mile outside and surrounding the Anaheim Reson land use compatibility with more distant areas will not likely be affected by the implemented land uses of the proposed project This boundary is approximately the area defined by Locust Avenue and 1 5 and Vermont to the north Ninth StreetHampstead Street to the west Orangewood Avenue to the south and 1 5 and Cambridge Street to the east 4 2 2 YEAR 2000 The area influenced by cumulative land use impacts are limited to parcels within the boundaries of the Anaheim Reson and the surrounding areas Related projects in the surrounding Anaheim Reson have been included in Table 41 if they have either been I submitted for plan processing 2 approved by the City of Anaheim or adjacent cities and or 3 have been engaged in active construction Largely a developed area the established land use patterns and intensities are reinforced by General Plan designations for the Anaheim Resort The areas surrounding the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area south of Orangewood Avenue and Katella Avenue west of Walnut Street West Street and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area 4 6 Cumulmive Impacrs CRA CRA 4 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR north of Ball Road and north and east of Vermont Avenue east of Haster Street are fully developed with residential units including apartments mobile homes and single family attached and detached units No development is anticipated in these areas but they are close enough to the proposed and related project developments to potentially be affected by the cumulative development of the proposed project and development within the Anaheim Reson Existing land use relationships were established through development of the various land uses over time consistent with General Plan designations The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan which includes zoning development standards and design guidelines the General Plan and the adopted Disneyland Reson Specific Plan all address land use compatibility in terms of providing edge treatment with appropriate setbacks height limits design features and landscape treatments to reduce potential land use incompatibilities and to enhance the aesthetic quality of the area The intent of the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan is to protect the integrity of the existing and future commercial recreation uses within the plan area 4 2 3 YEAR 2010 The additional development in the study area is anticipated to further the goals of the General Plan for the Anaheim Reson Through adherence to development standards and design guidelines proposed for the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan and those included in The Disneyland Reson Specific Plan the study area will be visually cohesive and internally compatible The issue of land use incompatibility with adjacent residential areas will still create significant impacts because of the proximity of the two different land use categories Commercial Recreation and Residential Implementation of design guidelines and development standards reflected in both the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan and the adopted Disneyland Reson Specific Plan will contribute to mitigation of cumulative land use compatibility impacts however these cumulative impacts on compatibility with adjacent residential uses are anticipated to remain significant 4 3 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION The future traffic scenarios analyzed in Section 3 3 Transponation and Circulation include the cumulative traffic impacts ofexisting conditions reasonably foreseeable projects and regional growth A detailed and quantitative analysis was undenaken to calculate the future traffic levels and future conditions within the study area for both the year 2000 and the year 2010 as described in Section 3 3 eRA eRA 4 4 7 Cumulative Impacts 01805 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR This analysis is briefly summarized below However the following summary should be considered in conjunction with Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation and Appendix C of this resort Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Circulation Study March 1994 which provides a more complete discussion of existing and future conditions and an explanation of the terms used in this section 4 3 1 STUDY AREA The traffic study area was defined as the area generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue the Santa Ana River SR 22 and Euclid Street The traffic study area includes all potential significant impacts of development within the Anaheim Resort However projected growth outside the traffic study area was also analyzed to determine the number of vehicular trips passing through the study area The analyses of cumulative traffic impacts assumed the following growth projections Southern California Association of Governments SCAG and Orange County Environmental Management Agency OCEMA projections of land use and traffic growth outside the City of Anaheim for 2010 and linearly interpolated for the year 2000 Anaheim s list of related projects as of 12 27 93 for growth in and around the Anaheim Resort between 1990 and 2000 including the Anaheim Stadium Business Center and the proposed Hotel Circle project OCEMA projections of land use and traffic growth in the City of Anaheim outside the Anaheim Resort for the year 2010 and modified to be consistent with the related projects list Buildout of the Anaheim Resort including The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan areas by 2000 4 3 2 YEAR 2000 4 3 2 1 Intenections and Street Se2ments As a result of implementation of the proposed project and related projects fable 4 1 by the year 2000 one intersection will operate at unacceptable levels of service LOS E or worse thus failing to meet the City of Anaheim s LOS D performance criteria assuming that only the commined improvements listed in Section 3 3 werecompleted by the year 2000 However it is anticipated that e CRAlCRA4 4 8 Cumularive Impacts ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR implementation of the non commined improvements and the completion of the identified mitigation measures discussed in Section 3 3 in conjunction with future growth and circulation improvements will allow this intersection to operate at acceptable levels of service LOS As described in Section 3 Transportation and Circulation with implementation of the commined improvements as future growth occurs and implementation of non commined improvements and project mitigation measures there will be no significant effect on local streets as a result of implementation of the proposed project and related projects 4 3 3 YEAR 2010 4 3 3 1 Intersections Sixteen intersections will operate at LOS E or worse assuming that only the year 2000 commined and non commined and year 2010 commined improvements are completed Future growth will trigger the requirement for the identified mitigation in Section 3 After implementation of the year 2010 non commined improvements listed in Section 3 3 four intersections will operate at unacceptable levels of service thus failing to meet the City of Anaheim s LOS D perfonnance criteria Implementation of the project mitigation measures identified in Section 3 3 of this EIR will reduce potential project impacts but not to a level less than significant Thus there would be a significant cumulative impact on study area intersections 4 3 4 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON TRANSIT SERVICES The OCTA provides public transit to the project area The ocrA anticipates that its ridership will increase 50 percent by the year 2010 with an increase in service of 45 percent Implementation of the project will generate substantial numbers oftrips on various fonns oftransit vehicles both publicly and privately operated such as tour buses shuttles and public transit buses and rail Given the ocrA projections it is anticipated that implementation ofthe proposed and other related projects will increase ridership to approximately 90 percent of seated capacity in the year 2000 and 92 percent in the year 2010 from approximately 54 percent today Therefore assuming realization of the anticipated increase in service effects on transit services would not be significant see Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation CRA CRA 4 4 9 Cumulative Impacts 01807 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Implementation of the proposed project would accommodate a number of transit improvements that are planned or are under consideration but which are not yet funded and were not assumed in the analysis of potential traffic impacts Nevertheless these improvements may make alternative transportation modes available in the future and are therefore important to consideration of cumulative impacts The potential improvements include the Central Orange County Fixed Guideway System the Transitway and Commuter HaY Lane System expanded OCTA bus service and intercity commuter rail services These improvements would be considered beneficial cumulative effects 4 4 AIR OUALITY 4 4 1 STUDY AREA The regional study area for air quality encompasses the South Coast Air Basin Basin The SCAQMD maintains an air monitoring station approximately four blocks north of the northeast cornet of the existing Disneyland Theme Park i tl r ai1i j iry d area Anaheim 3 C1 des the Anaheim resort Refer to Section 3 4 4 4 2 YEARS 2000 AND 2010 4 4 2 1 Relional Imoacls The 1991 AQMP projects growth in population employment and housing for the Basin Additionally the AQMP looks at the related increase in YMT and emissions and identifies mitigation strategies that address the impacts of growth including a series of actions by local governments 4 4 2 2 Ooeralional Imoacts The cumulative impact of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The Disneyland Resort and other foreseeable projects in the vicinity were estimated based on trip generation factors developed for each type ofproject The trip generation factors were applied to future development and the total number of trips and trip were developed through use of the CARB Emission Model EMFACfFI 1 Stationary sources will have to be offset to meet SCAQMD requirements Utility emissions were not calculated because basin emissions have been capped Mobile emissions overstate the potential CRA CRA 4 4 10 Cumulalive Impacts e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR emissions because they do not assume trip reduction programs for these sources will also be reduced through SCAQMD rules and 1991 AQMD measures Natural gas usage Table 4 1 summarizes projected operational emissions from these related projects in the year 2000 TABLE 4 41 CUMULATIVE OPERATIONAL EMiSSIONS IN THE YEAR 2000 WITIlOUT MlTIGATION IN POUNDS DA Y ROG CO SO NO PMI0 Project 69 527 108 28 Disneyland Resort 329 2 002 98 1 157 104 Other Related Projects 1 370 10 692 1 ill 562 Total 1 768 13 221 98 3 443 694 SCAQMD Significance 55 550 150 55 150 Threshold Are Cumulative Impacts Yes Yes No Yes Yes Significant Total trips for each source based on Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition Emission estimate from Disneyland Resort EIR Source JHA Environmental Consultants 1994 Although specific related projects have not been identified for 2010 there will be increases in VMT resulting from cumulative growth in the region including buildout under the provisions of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan However emission rates will be decreasing because of the implementation of new vehicle and fuel standards Nevertheless cumulative emissions increases in 2010 are likely to exceed the thresholds of significance for reactive organic gases ROG nitrogen oxides NOJ carbon monoxide CO and PM 10 CRACRA 4 4 11 Cumulative Impacts 01809 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR After implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and all related projects there will be cumulative air quality impacts in 2000 and 2010 resulting from the increase in VMT by new tourist guests visiting the area and increased employment While emissions resulting from vehicle trips made by these guests to and from the project area have been set forth in Tables 3 4 7 and 3 4 8 and umulative air quality impacts from related projects are set forth in Table 4 1 additional regional cumulative air quality impacts are expected from the additional vehicle trips and VMT created by new guests during the portion of their stays that is not spent at The Disneyland Resort project or within the Anaheim Resort The estimates of emissions shown in Table 4 1 are conservative because the calculations do not account for the reduction in VMT because ofthe extended length of stay associated with The Disneyland Resort or other hotels in the Anaheim Resort Stationary source emissions from equipment at projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and related projects are required by SCAQMD Regulation XIII to be fully offset at the project level and will not have a direct or cumulative impact on regional emissions after such offsetting A discussed previously under Public Services and Utilities Section 3 9 9 Electricity electrical generation emissions in the Basin have been capped Any increase in electricity usage will be provided by electricity generated out of the Basin or by low polluting alternatives Natural gas usage will also be reduced through SCAQMD rules and through energy conservation requirements Stationary sources and utilities will not contribute to adverse cumulative impacts because of offsetting requirements however the increase in emissions from direct vehicle trips associated with the project without mitigation will contribute on a cumulative basis in both 2000 and 2010 to significant adverse impacts on reactive organic gas nitrogen oxide carbon monoxide and PM 10 emissions in the Basin With mitigation such impacts will still be considered significant 4 4 2 3 Cumulative LocaJ Carbon Monoxide Imoacts The traffic analysis for impacts on local intersections includes related projects identified for 2000 and 2010 of projected local growth in its determination of the baseline conditions Therefore the analysis under Local Impacts Section 3 4 2 3 Air Quality Dperational Impacts also addresses the cumulative local air quality impacts of related projects in both 2000 and 2010 CRAlCRA 4 4 12 Cumulative Impacts ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR There will be no exceedances of either the state or federal I Hour and 8 Hour CO standards in either 2000 or 2010 with implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and the related projects Therefore no significant cumulative impact on local CO is anticipated 4 5 NOISE 4 5 1 STUDY AREA The study area for noise impacts is generally defined by Lincoln Avenue to the north Chapman Avenue to the south Euclid Street to the west and the Santa Ana River to the east Although project noise will be limited to the immediate area the larger study area was used to address potential cumulative traffic noise impacts 4 5 2 YEAR 2000 In year 2000 implementation of the project plus the related projects would contribute a maximum of 0 2 dBA traffic noise increases on local street segments and a maximum of 0 I dBA on 1 5 near SR 22 over corresponding no project levels These increases would not be considered significant There are 45 street segments that would either have no traffic noise increases or have lower traffic noise levels because of changes of the area traffic patterns No street segment would have traffic noise level increases higher than 0 1 dB from the implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and related projects over the corresponding year 2000 baseline levels Most street segments would have no traffic noise level increases over the corresponding year 2000 background levels Without mitigation for noise sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to those related projects that might generate high noise levels certain related projects may generate significant noise impacts However the proposed project would not contribute to these site specific impacts therefore no significant cumulative effects are anticipated 4 5 3 YEAR 2010 The noise impacts associated with vehicular traffic described in Section 3 5 Noise are considered to be cumulative in nature As mentioned in Section 4 3 2 the traffic analysis looked at baseline data consisting of anticipated regional growth and related projects in the Anaheim Resort Therefore traffic noise levels with the project are representative of a cumulative 2010 scenario CRA CRA 4 4 13 Cumularive Impacts 01811 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e The traffic noise impacts of the proposed project over future background levels are considered less than significant However the cumulative impact of future baseline traffic noise levels will be greater than 3 dBA from the existing levels along the following segments Convention Way between West Street and Harbor Boulevard Gene Autry Way between Lewis Street and State College Boulevard Orangewood Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to SR 57 Freedman Way between Clementine Street and Haster Street West Street between Cerritos Avenue and Ball Road Manchester Avenue between Ball Road and 1 5 Lewis Street between Gene Autry Way and Katella Avenue State College Boulevard between Gene Autry Way and Katella Avenue 1 5 between Orangewood Avenue and Katella Avenue Traffic volumes under cumulative 2010 conditions along some roadway segments not necessarily along the entire road within the study area would be lower than their corresponding existing ones partly due to redistribution of the traffic to other roadway segments within the study area Traffic noise levels along these r adway segments would decrease from their corresponding existing volumes n d If ij r I r in the year 2010 inaJl meir c9nditieRs noise levels for receptors along these segments may be lower due to roadway widening therefore pushing these receptors further away from the roadway centerline As part of the 1 5 widening project between SR 22 and SR 91 Caltrans has analyzed the potential for noise impacts because of the planned improvements in the Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Based upon noise criteria of an acceptable threshold of 67 Leq or below the noise analysis concluded that no sound abatement walls would be necessary from 200 feet south of South Street through the intersection of1 5 with Ball Road Should any noise walls be needed in the future itwill be Caltrans responsibility to provide noise walls as implementation of the project with cumulative traffic is not anticipated to produce noise exceeding acceptable levels None of the related projects are anticipated to create significant noise impacts by the use itself only by the cumulative traffic created CRAiCRA 4 4 14 Cumulative lmpacrs e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 4 6 EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGY SOILS AND SEISl fiCITY 4 6 1 STIJDY AREA Impacts related to geology and soils are based primarily on site specific conditions see Section 3 6 Earth Resources The exception to this is in instances where geologic features e g earthquake faults might affect an extensive area or where development of aproject might affect the geology of the adjacent development areas e g because of extensive erosion or landslides The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project area is not affected by any of the specific geologic conditions mentioned above as the effects relating to geology and soils can be mitigated As such the cumulative impact study area for geology and soils is the same as the project area 4 6 2 YEARS 2000 AND 2010 Specific cumulative effects from grading during construction are addressed in Section 3 4 Air Quality 3 5 Noise and 3 6 Earth Resources Because of the nature of geologic and seismic impacts cumulative impacts associated with implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project in association with surrounding development are not considered significant Additionally it is reasonable to assume that all cumulative development will be subject to requirements similar to those imposed on projects within the Specific Plan Area to reduce impacts and seismic risks with proper implementation of project specific mitigation measures 4 7 GROUNDWATER AND HYDROLOGY 4 7 1 STUDY AREA The study area for groundwater and surface hydrology is the forebay portion of the South Coast Ground Water Basin refer to Section 3 7 as this encompasses the entire groundwater basin for the project area 4 7 2 YEAR 2000 AND 2010 There are three areas of potential cumulative impacts to consider with implementation of the proposed project those of overall water supply demand infrastructUre constraint and groundwater quality eRAeRA 4 15 Cumulative ImpacIs 01813 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Ie Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR Potential cumulative impacts include reducing recharge to the groundwater basin because of the cumulative effect of paving currently unpaved land Although it is anticipated that the cumulative impact of paving unpaved land in the vicinity of the project area will result in the reduction of natural recharge to the groundwater basin the OCWD Groundwater Management Plan is designed to accommodate and offset the impacts of new development to groundwater resources to the greatest extent possible Dames Moore 1992b New development will presumably increase water demand and usage OCWD will levy assessment fees which in turn will be used to purchase surface imported water to recharge supplies within the District However if drought conditions persist deliveries of imported water to recharge the groundwater basin could be unreliable To assist with meeting water demands under these conditions the use of reclaimed water for landscape irrigation and ornamental features such as waterways or ponds is encouraged by the City of Anaheim and the OCWD As described in Section 3 9 6 mitigation is provided to encourage future developments to provide dual plumbing to accommodate the use of reclaimed water All developments constructed following the completion reclaimed water distribution systems will be required to provide dual plumbing within their development Thus increased water demand is offset and the impact of development on the water resources is minimized Section 4 9 6 discusses anticipated water demand from cumulative projects Infrastructure improvements are expected to be provided as long as there are available water resources In addition to the issue ofpaved lands affecting groundwater supply a major cumulative consideration is that of the potential for drought The OCWD Groundwater Management Plan includes provisions to develop new recharge reclamation and desalination projects to minimize the effects of drought The OCWD may also need to purchase water from the state water bank or MWD to meet future needs The related projects and other future growth in the study area as well as implementation of the proposed project will increase the potential of stormwater runoff transporting surface water quality contaminants from roadway surfaces lawns driveways parking lots and other exposed structural and landscape surfaces into the storm drain system In general mass loading of contaminants on areas is a potential impact associated with new development Typical urban runoff contaminants i e oil and grease surfactant heavy metals solvents pesticides nutrients or fecal coliform bacteria can be expected within runoff reaching the storm drains serving the project area While the OCWD Groundwater Management Plan stipulates water quality enhancement programs for 4 16 Cumularive Impacls CRAiCRA 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR the future projects over I acre in size will be required to develop stormwater pollution prevention plans that use Best Management Practices BMPs to obtain reductions in urban pollutant loading to the maximum extent practicable A majority of the related projects as well as implementation of the proposed project will be required to implement stormwater pollution prevention plans and will replace developments which do not have such plans Thus development of the proposed and related projects will reduce the potential of stormwater runofftransporting surface water quality contaminants This will be an improvement over the existing conditions and will improve further in 2010 as more land has been developed under the new NPDES requirements The cumulative impacts associated with runoff and flooding potential are discussed in Section 3 9 8 Storm Drains 4 8 EMPLOYMENT POPULATION AND HOUSING The following analysis of cumulative impacts is based in large part on the report contained in Appendix H of The Disneyland Resort EIR Employment Population and Housing to the EIR An Assessment of the Employment Population Housing and Job Housing Balance Impacts of The Disneyland Resort Project Additionally this analysis should be considered in conjunction with Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing The referenced section provides a more complete discussion of the existing and future conditions related to these issues and explains the methodology used in the analysis The scale of employment population and housing of the related projects when considered with that ofthe project is within the growth forecast for the Subregion and therefore will not produce significant impacts 4 8 1 STUDY AREA The study area for employment population and housing consisted of the City of Anaheim located in the northwest Orange County Subregion as defined by SCAG 4 8 2 YEAR 2000 The analysis presented in Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing describes the regional growth that is forecasted to occur in the City of Anaheim and the northwest Orange County Subregion Subregion in the 1990 2000 time period as well as in the 1990 2010 time period The analysis is CRA CRA4 4 17 Cumulative Impacts 01815 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e based on the growth forecasts presented in the Regional Growth Management Plan GMP which was prepared by SCAG The GMP and the EIR prepared for the GMP are herein incorporated by reference Section 3 I Land Use Related Plans and Policies In addition to the analysis presented in Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing the potential cumulative effect of the related projects plus the impacts of implementation of the proposed project have been analyzed One way to analyze the potential employment effects of the related projects is to use commonly accepted employment density factors e g employees per square foot of development by use Using this methodology it is estimated that the implementation of the related projects would generate approximately 43 121 new jobs The estimated employment generated by these projects is well within the SCAG forecasts of an increase of nearly 93 000 new jobs in the Subregion between 1990 and 2000 The total cumulative effect will be the employment opportunities created by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan projects and related projects Le 77 238 jobs Comparing the total cumulative employment with the SCAG forecasts indicates that the total cumulative employment will represent roughly 9 percent of the total employment in the Subregion in the year 2000 and 83 percent of the 1990 to 2000 employment growth forecast Thus while the total number ofjobs that will be created by implementation of the proposed project and the related projects is nearly three times the SCAG projection for 1990 2000 job growth in Anaheim but well within the SCAG projection for the subregion Assuming 208 SRO dwelling units as part of the related projects the related projects will account for roughly 0 2 percent of the total housing stock forecasted for the City of Anaheim in the year 2000 and a much smaller increment 0 03 percent of the subregional housing stock in the year 2000 The population anticipated to reside in these units would represent less than one hundredth of 1 percent of the total population in the Subregion in the year 2000 The cumulative increase of population associated with the related projects and the indirect increases in population associated with project specific households are within the SCAG forecasts in the GMP Therefore these impacts are less than significant 418 Cumularive Impacts eRAeRA e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 4 8 3 YEAR 2010 For an analysis of the potential cumulative effects of buildout of the proposed project plus the uses allowable in the City and Subregion in the year 2010 such as the buildout of The Disneyland Resort and the Anaheim Resort it is appropriate to consider the growth forecasts prepared by SCAG The analysis in Section 3 8 indicates that the proposed project is consistent with the regional growth forecasts prepared by SCAG An analysis of the SCAG forecasts is presented in Section 3 8 and should be reviewed for a more detailed discussion In summary it is anticipated that a total of216 218jobs would exist within the City of Anaheim in the year 2010 an increase of 28 percent over present employment and an estimated 941 483 jobs would exist in the Subregion an increase of roughly 25 percent over present levels The growth of the local and regional employment levels is not considered an environmental effect to the extent that this growth creates environmental effects these effects are discussed in other portions of this analysis of cumulative effects The regional forecasts indicate the City of Anaheim will experience a 14 percent increase in population 36 298 people between 1990 and 2010 the Subregion will experience an increase of 6 5 percent 105 116 people in the same period From 1990 to 2010 an additional 26 241 housing units will be constructed in the City of Anaheim an increase of28 percent An additional 105 708 housing units are forecast for the Subregion during the same period an increase of 19 percent The new housing units that will be indirectly related to or induced by the implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be well within these estimates therefore implementation ofthe proposed project will not trigger new cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of the forecasted growth have previously been considered by the City of Anaheim in adopting the allowable land use designatiOns and in the EIR prepared by SCAG for the GMP CRAiCRA 4 4 19 Cumulative Impacts 01817 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reso1 Specific Plan EIR 4 9 PUBLIC SERVICES AlID lJTILlTIES 4 9 1 F1RE PROTECTION 4 9 1 Studv Area The study area for cumulative fire services impacts consists of the Anaheim Resort and Fire Station Service Areas 3 and 6 4 9 1 2 Year 2000 To determine the cumulative impacts to the Fire Depanment a conservative assumption of a 5 percent annual growth pattern provided by the Anaheim Fire Depanment is used to approximate the development within the Anaheim Resort the relevant study area as defined by the Anaheim Fire Depanmenl Without recommended mitigation based on a 5 percent annual growth rate provided by the Anaheim Fire Depanment units from Stations 3 and 6 will respond to approximately 40 percent more calls per year by 1998 corresponding to an increase of 2 661 calls This is considered a substantial though not significant cumulative impact Mitigation measures as described in Section 3 9 1 that ensure adequate level of service is maintained will be required for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and related projects in the Anaheim Resort Section 3 9 I Fire Protection outlines specific mitigation measures With this mitigation in place for all cumulative projects no significant impacts on fire services are anticipated 4 9 1 3 Year 2010 It is anticipated that when implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is completed having reached the maximum allowable densities and related projects including The Disneyland Resort are built out by the year 2010 there will be a 100 percent increase in the demand for emergency responses which equates to approximately 3 802 calls per year for units based at Fire Stations 3 and 6 Approximately 61 percent of these calls will be for single unit paramedic engine responses The remainder will require one or more units to respond This is a significant impact and would constitute a substantial cumulative increase in demand Mitigation measures described in 4 20 Cumulative Impacts CRAiCRA 4 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Section 3 9 1 will be required for all future developments to ensure service is maintained at an adequate level within the Anaheim Resort 4 9 2 POLICE SERVICES 4 9 2 1 Studv Area The study area for cumulative police service impacts is the Anaheim Resort as represented in reporting districts 1824 1825 1923 1924 1925 2023 2024 2025 2123 2124 2125 and 2126 4 9 2 2 Year 2000 2010 According to the Police Department police coverage requirements in the Anaheim Resort which includes the Specific Plan area are expected to double by the year 2010 based on a doubling of developed square footage in these areas The annual number of calls for service in this area would thus be expected to double during this period from 9 535 calls in 1993 to 19 070 calls in 2010 This represents a growth rate of 5 percent per year As noted in Section 3 9 2 incremental growth and tax proceeds within the Anaheim Resort will facilitate the provision of additional police personnel and equipment necessary to meet the cumulative service needs within the study area EPS 1993 No significant impacts are anticipated 4 9 3 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE 4 9 3 1 Studv Area The study area for cumulative impacts to solid waste is the service area of the OlindaOlinda Alpha LandfilL 4 9 3 2 Year 2000 and Year 2010 Based on generation factors for specific land use types e g office commercial hotel warehouse etc the related projects will generate an estimated 16 148 tons of solid waste annually 44 tons per day The proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area plus the related projects identified in Table 4 1 will cumulatively generate approximately tons of solid waste per year 85 tons per day oJ r eRAeRA 4 4 21 Cumularive ImpaclS 01819 e ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e The aggregate amount will represent approximately Y2 percent of the current daily permined capacity at the Olinda Olinda Alpha landfill This would represent a significant cumulative impact on solid waste disposal in the OlindaOlinda Alpha service area While the quantity of solid waste produced is expected to be a significant impact on the current landfill system the City of Anaheim has completed a Solid Waste Management Plan which will reduce solid waste by 50 percent by the year 2000 It is anticipated that the implementation of such plans throughout the region will extend the life of local landfills It can reasonably be assumed that all related projects as well as the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area will be required to execute programs designed to limit the amount of solid waste sent to the Olinda Olinda Alpha landfill thus reducing the level ofany cumulative impacts however the cumulative impacts will still be significant The types of impacts discussed for year 2000 are likely to also occur in year 2010 Without being able to characterize the project in the area beyond those identified in Table 4 1 it is speculative to try and characterize cumulative impacts beyond those previously identified Compliance with the CitY of Anaheim Solid Waste Management Plan will reduce the cumulative impact on the local landfill system however the impacts will still be significant 4 9 4 PARKS 4 9 4 1 Studv Area The cumulative study area for the assessment of park impacts is West Anaheim as defined by the General Plan 4 9 4 2 Year 2000 Parks are developed in the City of Anaheim on an as needed basis An existing deficiency in parkland has been identified by the City There is a minimal number of housing units proposed in connection with the related projects which will directly generate additional demand for park sites Additional housing and employment population resulting from employment associated with the nonresidential related projects is anticipated There will be a significant cumulative impact on parks from antcipated growth in West Anaheim without mitigation however the proposed project does not contribute to the existing parkland deficiency and therefore will not contribute to impacts from other projects CRACRA 4 4 22 Cumulative Impacts e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 4 9 4 3 Year 2010 Any additional residential development in West Anaheim will increase the need for parkland which is mentioned above The buildout of the Anaheim Resort will not create new residences but may generate the demand for housing in the City Measures to meet the goals of the General Plan Parks Recreation and Community Services Element would offset any cumulative impact to the park system 4 9 5 SCHOOLS 4 9 5 1 Studv Area The study area for cumulative assessment of school impacts is comprised of the district boundaries of the Anaheim City School District ACSD and the Anaheim Union High School District AUHSD 4 9 5 2 Year 2000 and 2010 The following analysis of cumulative impacts on the local school districts is based on the study contained in Appendix J Schools Analysis of The Disneyland Resort EIR which is incorporated by reference Additionally this cumulative analysis should be read in conjunction with Section 3 95 Schools which provides a more detailed analysis ofthe existing conditions future conditions and the impacts of the project The districts forecast deficiencies in the future as a result of growth within their boundaries Infill housing and higher densities in existing housing are expected to take place within the study area including development of related projects within the study area This would generate additional students at AUHSD and ACSD The related projects include 208 housing units The nonresidential related projects would indirectly generate new students However because of the absence of detailed data on the characteristics of the labor force associated with the nonresidential related projects it is not possible to predict the possible secondary impacts of the related projects with any degree of precision Using the Student Generation Rates described in Section 3 9 5 the 24 living units within the Stadium Park West SRO related project would generate 8 ACSD students and 6 AUHSD students The impacts of these new students On specific schools will depend upon the enrollment capacity situation at the schools nearest the location of the Stadium Park West SRO related project at the time it is constructed This relatively small number of units has presumably been accounted for in each CRAiCRA4 4 23 Cumulilrive Impacts 01821 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR School District s projection Each new project requiring discretionary approval will be subject to individual environmental review by the City including where applicable impacts on school facilities The development fee for the Districts L72 per square foot on residential development and 0 28 per square foot on commercial industrial development currently will be collected for each new development where appropriate It is unknown how many residential units will be constructed within the ACSD and AUHSD by the year 2010 It is assumed that development of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would likely induce residential growth within the City but the amount is unknown For this reason it must be concluded that impacts to schools will be significant Imposition of developer fees in accordance with state law will mitigate potential impacts to level considered less than significant by state law 4 9 6 WATER SERVICE 4 9 6 1 Studv Area The relevant study area is defined to encompass the water distribution system located west of 1 5 that has recently been modified to be incorporated within the 335 zone static HGL pressure zone All of the related projects sites are located within this pressure zone 4 9 6 2 Year 2000 and Year 2010 Water demand within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area at 2010 buildout is estimated at 1 mgd The projected water demand for the related projects was estimated based on the demand factors for the size and use of projects The average daily water demand for the related projects is estimated at J2 million gallons per day mgd It should be noted that this calculation describes the total water demand not the increment related to future growth since no credit was taken for the existing uses that would be removed or modified by the related projects Based on this methodology it is estimated that the cumulative average water demand of the related projects plus the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be k54 mgd A discussion of water availability from OCWD is presented in Section 3 7 Groundwater and Surface Hydrology The proposed improvements to the water distribution system that are listed as mitigation measures in Section 3 9 6 were designed to accommodate the total increase in water demand from the proposed 4 24 Cumulative Impacts eRA eRA4 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR project and reasonably foreseeable growth in the area including the related projects that are part of the water service area In calculating the necessary improvements the City of Anaheim based its analysis on its 5 year Capital Improvement Plan implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project and related projects Therefore with the implementation of the proposed improvements with developments paying their fair share there will not be a significant adverse effect on the water system The analysis of cumulative impacts in the year 2010 was based upon growth projections regarding the study area that were based on the allowable uses under the existing zoning and General Plan and the potential buildout of the surrounding area under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The proposed improvements listed in Section 3 9 6 Water Service have been sized to accommodate the buildout ofthe Anaheim Resort The average daily water demand for the Anaheim Resort Specific Ie v Plan and cumulative development is mgd Therefore implementation of these improvements would reduce potential cumulative effects to a less than significant level Mitigation measures will be required to ensure service is maintained at an adequate level with buildout ofthe Anaheim Resort with the property owner developer paying a fair share of the required improvement costs 4 9 7 WASTEWATERSEWER SERVICE The analysis of cumulative impacts should be considered in conjunction with the analysis of the project s impacts in Section 3 9 7 of this EIR which provides a more complete discussion of the existing and future wastewater sewer system 4 9 7 1 Studv Area The study area is made up ofresidential commercial and industrial land uses and consists ofportions of Anaheim Garden Grove and a section of unincorporated Orange County The study area is served by the City of Anaheim local sanitary sewer system The proposed project and the related projects are tributary to the City s main sewer lines located in Katella Avenue Ball Road Cerritos Avenue Euclid Street Cerritos Avenue Walnut Street Harbor Boulevard West Street Orangewood Avenue and Chapman Avenue The description of these lines is provided in Section 3 9 7 The South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study was recently prepared by the City for Central Anaheim which includes all three Specific Plans the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The Disneyland Resort CRA CRA4 4 25 Cumulative Impacts 01823 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Specific Plan and Hotel Circle Specific Plan areas The purpose of the study is to ensure adequate capacity for buildout of all three Specific Plan areas 4 9 7 2 Year 2000 2010 The Sewer Deficiency Study analyzed existing facilities for capacities or restrictions and based on year 2010 buildout land use conditions and densities identified necessary improvements to accommodate development within the Sopth Central Area which includes the Anaheim Resort As r o 1 no r 5t i rd oL u21 C 3 v 0 identified in Section 3 9 7 lby the year 2010 a cumulative totaI of 39 947 linear feet or an increase r r v o c T In t G L in 19 102 feet of pip segment deficiencies Will res lt Implementation of the mitigation measures c stated in Section 3 9 7 will enable the sewer system to accommodate development within the Anaheim o Resort beyond the 2010 horizon year of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Mitigation would be provided by property owners developers in the area on a fair share basis No significant cumulative impact is anticipated 4 9 8 STORM DRAINS The analysis of cumulative impacts should be considered in conjunction with the analysis of the project s impacts in Section 3 9 8 of this EIR which provides a more complete discussion of the existing and future storm drain system The City recently completed the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area that addresses the existing storm drain systems and the existing shortfall of storm drain capacity due to planned development in the area The above study evaluates the Anaheim Barber City Channel East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel and the area tributary to Carbon Creek Channel for proposed drainage improvements at total buildout conditions and management programs to handle onsite and offsite flows This project as well as future development projects will be required to complete City required mitigation measures described in Section 3 9 8 The above mentioned drainage analysis are based upon the growth projections currently available and the preliminary recommended improvements to the system 426 Cumulari ve Impacts CRA CRA 4 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plnn EIR 4 9 8 1 Studv Area The related projects evaluated in this section are those that could potentially have impacts on the storm drain lines into which the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan developments and other related projects will drain The facilities serving the study area include the Anaheim Barber City ABC Channel the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel EGGWC and Haster Basin which is part ofthe EGGWC and the Carbon Creek Channel CCC 4 9 8 2 Year 2000 2010 Nine drainage areas are located in the South Central Area These nine areas are numbered 18 through 26 as shown on Exhibit 3 9 4 South Central Area Drainage Areas Area 18 drains to the Carbon Iic Creek Channel Areas 19 through 23 drain to the B Channel and Areas 24 26 drain to facilities that are tributary to the EGGW Channel The analysis of cumulative impacts was based on buildout in the study area extending beyond the horizon year of 2010 Buildout was determined based on the allowable uses under the existing zoning and General Plan and buildout of the surrounding area under the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and Hotel Circle Specific Plan as well as other relevant plans programs and related policies As noted in Section 3 9 8 based on the findings of the recently completed Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area the existing storm drain system has a capacity of a 2 year to 8 year storm Development of related projects within the area currently draining to the public stormdrain system in Drainage Areas 18 19 20 21 22 24 and 25 will result in an increase in stormwater runoff The existing pipes in these areas are inadequate to handle any increase in drainage runoff flows from future development within the Anaheim Resort The improvements identified in Section 3 9 8 will be necessary to increase the overall system capacity to at least a layear and 25 year storm depending upon the particular drainage basin These improvements consist of parallel storm drains relief drains extensions of existing systems and removal and replacement of existing facilities The proposed improvements listed in Section 3 9 8 and improvements recommended by the City s Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area will be sized to accommodate the future development within the Anaheim Resort other related projects and other areas that would be serviced by the storm drain CRA CRA4 4 27 CumulntiVI Impacts 01825 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e c 0 system draining to the AIl EGGWC and CCc Therefore implementation of these improvements would reduce potential cumulative impacts to a less than significant level 4 9 9 ELECTRICITY 4 9 9 1 Study Area The study area for electrical is generally defined by Lincoln Avenue to the north Chapman Avenue to the south Euclid Street to the west and the Santa Ana River to the east 4 9 9 2 Year 2000 and Year 2010 The total combined consumption of the project plus related projects is 4 273 311 429 kwh annually or 11 707 702 kwh per day Electrical power will be available to the project area as well as the related projects without a reduction in service to existing customers A new lOO MVA substation will replace the Katella substation which will be demolished during the widening of 5 The construction of a 120 MVA substation at The Disneyland Resort and the lOO MVA relocated Katella substation and the added capacity to the existing Southwest Substation will reduce the impact on electrical service to a level considered not significant The City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department has indicated that electrical power will be available to new developments within the study area t is infeasible to calculate the increase in consumption of the projects but it will be related to factors such as growth and the implementation ofconservation measures such as those identified in Section 3 9 9 Depending upon the magnitude of future developments improvements may be required to expand local electrical facilities Improvements will be undertaken on an as needed basis and a cumulative impact to electrical service in the area is not anticipated Regional growth and associated energy consumption is described in the Regional Growth Management Plan E R see Section 3 1 Land Use Related Plans and Policies No significant cumulative impacts are anticipated CRA CRA 4 428 Cumulative Impacts e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 4 9 10 NATURAL GAS SERVICE 4 9 10 1 Studv Area The study area for natural gas is generally defined by Lincoln Avenue to the north Chapman Avenue to the south Euclid Street to the west and the Santa Ana River to the east 4 9 10 2 Year 2000 and Year 2010 The total demand generated by the related projects and implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is 976 675 MBTU annually The related projects are not concentrated in one area SCG can meet the energy needs of the related projects without adverse impacts to surrounding uses The total cumulative demand is not considered significant because of the amount of reserves available Although it is infeasible to precisely calculate the total natural gas consumption that will occur as a result of buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area plus growth ofthe surrounding areas the anticipated increase will be substantial SCG anticipates being able to meet the energy needs of this growth As discussed in Section 4 I the Regional Growth Management Plan EIR provides analysis of regional growth and recommended conservation measures No significant cumulative impacts are anticipated because of the reserves available 4 9 11 TELEPHONE SERVICE 4 9 11 1 Studv Area The study area for telephone service is generally defined by Lincoln Avenue to the north Chapman Avenue to the south Euclid Street to the west and the Santa Ana River to the east 4 9 11 2 Years 2000 and 2010 Implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and related projects within the Pacific Bell service area may require expansion of existing telephone facilities and services The phone eRA eRA 4 4 29 Cumulative Impacts 01827 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e company has indicated that it will have no difficulty in serving additional development from buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan plus related projects therefore no impact on telephone service to existing customers is anticipated 4 9 12 TELEVISION 4 9 12 1 Studv Area The study area for television service is generally defined by Lincoln Avenue to the north Chapman Avenue to the south Euclid Street to the west and the Santa Ana River to the east 4 9 12 2 Years 2000 and 2010 Implementation of related projects together with the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and eventual buildout ofthe area may create temporary disruption oftelevision service at area residences As described in Section 3 9 12 projects with multi story structures will be required to mitigate any impacts on television reception created by these structures therefore no cumulative impact is anticipated i4 4 10 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 4 10 1 STUDY AREA The study area for cumulative effects of hazardous materials is the Anaheim Resort 4 10 2 YEARS 2000 AND 2010 The proposed Anaheim Reson Specific Plan and the related projects would require hazardous materials analysis at a minimum level equivalent to that required for CEQA clearance Based upon project compliance and the federal and state compliance regulations regarding the treatment and storage of such materials there are no significant cumulative impacts anticipated 4 30 Cumulative Impacts CRAlCRA4 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 4 11 VISUAL RESOURCES AND AESlHETICS 4 11 1 STUDY AREA The study area for cumulative effects to visual resources is a Q 5 mile border around the Anaheim Resort 4 11 2 YEARS 2000 AND 2010 Several portions of the Anaheim Resort are currently being planned for future enhancement and development through the establishment of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and the approved The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Both ofthe above referenced plans include provisions for the enhancement of the existing urban environment by providing a framework for the implementation of urban design improvements and ensuring that public areas would be properly maintained Implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan in conjunction with implementation of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan with compatible design standards contained in both would contribute to positive cumulative impacts to existing aesthetic visual conditions Other plans and programs under consideration would also be expected to provide visual enhancement Even with the aesthetic benefits significant impacts are anticipated to occur for residents adjacent to the future Disneyland Resort parking structures 4 12 CULTURAL RESOURCES Because of the currently urban nature of the area no known cultural resources are expected to occur within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area or at any of the related project sites Therefore development and eventual buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area along with the related projects in the Anaheim Resort are not anticipated to contribute to a potential cumulative impact on cultural resources 4 13 ENERGY 4 13 1 STUDY AREA The study area for cumulative effects to energy is defined by the Anaheim Resort eRA1eRA 4 4 31 Cumulative Impacts 01829 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR 4 13 2 YEARS 2000 11 2010 Energy will be consumed with operation of projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and related projects in the study area Project impacts would be reduced to a level below significance by implementation of identified mitigation measures Implementation of the proposed project and related projects will result in electricity and natural gas consumption as well as fuel consumption associated with vehicle trips The cumulative consumption of electricity and natural gas is discussed in Sections 4 9 9 and 4 9 10 respectively Potential cumulative impacts are anticipated to be significant although they could be mitigated to a level less than significant by implementation of measures similar to the mitigation measures identified for the project 4 32 Cumulative Impacts eRA eRA e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR SECTION 5 0 ALTERIATIVES TO TIIE PROPOSED PROJECT e 5 1 SL fMARY OF ALTERNATIVES This section of the EIR describes a range of reasonable alternatives to the project and evaluates the environmental impacts associated with each alternative as required by CEQA The analysis focuses on the alternatives capable of reducing or eliminating the adverse impacts of the project Additionally alternatives should be discussed in terms of achieving the project s objectives In order to set the framework for the alternatives discussion and analysis a brief overview of the intent ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is presented below One of the purposes of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan which is equally important in alternative evaluation is to establish an overall identity and land use plan which is intended to maximize the area s potential guide future development and ensure a balance between growth and infrastructure The land use densities assigned in the Specific Plan were developed to be consistent with the overall goal of maximizing the area s potential and providing for the needs of visitors to the area s attractions Consequently the permitted uses are primarily those which by their nature are related to tourism and entertainment The densities developed were assigned in consideration of the timing and availability of infrastructure such as vehicular access water and sewer capacity and storm drainage facilities proximity to the area s attractions and the relationship w surrounding land uses including The Anaheim Convention Center and The Disneyland Resort In response to these factors the Specific Plan establishes four density categories related to hotel motel development with accessory uses and support retail development which will help assure that development ofthe area will be compatible with committed and proposed infrastructure improvements and with the goal to protect surrounding residential uses 1 r J With these goals and objectives in mind alternatives were i I c S1dered Each of the alternatives presented in this section of the EIR is discussed in adequate detail to allow the decisionmaker to decide whether the alternative should be adopted in lieu of the proposed project For the purpose of providing the decisionmaker with as much information as possible certain alternatives are examined in detail even though they do not satisfy the project s objectives Specifically the following alternatives are analyzed No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative CRA CRA S 5 1 Alternatives 10 the Proposed Project e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Modified Land Use Alternative Inclusive of Hotel Circle Specific Plan area into the Project Area Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A Year 2000 Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative B Year 2008 Environmentally Superior Alternative For analysis of the No Project Alternative required by CEQA the No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative assumes the Anaheim Resort land use designations development standards and regulations would remain as they pertain to the plan area today or with minor adjustments and as stated in the C R designation of the General Plan This alternative assumes that the 489 7 acre Disneyland Resort project proceeds as approved but that the benefits associated with the close coordination of infrastructure design and streetscape improvements between the two plans are not realized This alternative would avoid all project impacts both positive and negative Further it assumes that the Hotel Circle Specific Plan is withdrawn or not approved The Modified Land Use Alternative assumes that the aforementioned 489 7 Disneyland Resort Specific Plan is implemented as approved but that the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan is withdrawn not approved or not approved as proposed This alternative would modify the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries to include the properties within the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan This would increase the acreage of the proposed project from 549 to 556 The properties within the Hotel Circle Specific Plan would be designated for the same hotel density as proposed in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan 1 103 rooms and as was analyzed in the Cumulative Impacts Section Section u Two lower intensity land use alternatives are analyzed in this EIR The first lower intensity land use alternative analyzes implementation ofthe first stage ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan development through the Year 2000 The total number of hotel rooms analyzed by this alternative assumes an increase of approximately 1 000 rooms by the Year 2000 or a total of approximately 12 190 hotel rooms within the Specific Plan area The second lower intensity land use alternative analyzes development within the Specific Plan area through the year 2008 This alternative assumes that approximately 11 300 fewer rooms total are developed within the Specific Plan area as described in the fiscal analysis prepared for the City of Anaheim by Economic Planning Systems lnc EPS 1993 incorporated by reference Additionally four other alternatives were considered The Higher Intensity Land Use Alternative and three land use alternatives previously analyzed in The Disneyland Resort EIR including The Land eRA CRA 5 5 2 01832 Alremanves 10 rhe Proposed ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Use Alternative Reduced Project Scale and Increased Projeit Scale Alternatives Three of these alternatives were eliminated from further consideration as noted below Hi2her Intensitv Alternative The Higher Intensity Land Use Alternative assumes development of The Disneyland Resort Speiific Plan as adopted and Hotel Circle Specific Plan as proposed However this alternative assumes an increase in the maximum level ofland use densities currently proposed in the Anaheim Resort Speiific Plan Preliminary analysis demonstrated that an increase in density above the 27 508 hotel rooms allowed by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by 2010 could not reasonably be supported by infrastructure capacity improvements currently in place and or planned for the Anaheim Resort This alternative would not support the City s goal to balance infrastructure improvements with anticipated growth for the Anaheim Resort For these reasons the Higher Intensity Land Use Alternative was eliminated from further consideration Disnevland Resort Land Use Alternatives Seition 5 0 ofThe Disneyland Resort EIR Alternatives to the Projeit evaluates three alternative land use scenarios for the 56 acre agricultural parcel within the southeast portion of the Anaheim Resort Spei ific Plan This parcel was removed from inclusion within the boundaries of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan prior to final adoption in June 1993 As such this parcel was subsequently included within the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The land use alternatives analyzed for this parcel include a The Land Use Alternative b The Reduced Scale Alternative and c The Increased Project Scale Alternative an alternative that would increase the size of the Disneyland Resort to include the entire Future Expansion District as a theme park with no parking provided on the site These alternatives were analyzed in detail within The Disneyland Resort EIR These three alternatives are hereby incorporated by reference into this document However for the purpose of providing the decision maker with as much information as possible a summary of the reasons these alternatives are not feasible and or appropriate for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are provided below Additionally it is important to note that two of these alternatives do not satisfy the objectives of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan project and therefore have been eliminated from further consideration The environmental impacts associated with implementation of these three alternatives are described in detail in The Disneyland Resort EIR Volume I Section 5 0 As noted in The Disneyland Resort EIR the term Future Expansion District refers to the 81 acre area located north of Orangewood Avenue west of Haster Street south of KatelIa Avenue and east of Harbor Boulevard Approximately 56 of the 81 acres within the Future Expansion District are CRAiCRA 5 5 3 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 01833 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR currently in agricultural production and have since been removed from The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan boundaries as noted The alternatives are as follows Land Use Alternative Under the Land Use Alternative a regional shopping mall would be proposed for the 81 acre Future Expansion District Land uses for this alternative include a regional mall hotel and restaurant uses and parking The regional mall would be located southeast of the Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue intersection and would contain 15 million square feet of retail space and 7 680 surface parking spaces Reasons ror Rejecting this Alternative rrom rurther consideration As noted in The Disneyland Resort EIR existing City land use plans and policies would have to be amended and a General Plan Amendment would be required to accommodate and permit respectively a regional shopping maiL Significant land use compatibility impacts from the juxtaposition of a 1 5 million square foot mall adjacent to residential uses would occur Additionally traffic impacts would be increased by approximately 3 410 additional p m peak hour trips thus affecting the level of service throughout the study area Overall vehicle trips would increase and average vehicle ridership for these trips would be lower resulting in increased emissions from mobile sources Development of the regional mall would not be part of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan but rather separate development plans would need to be developed for the malL Although the regional mall would provide services and attract tourists which would be consistent with the goals of the Commercial Recreation designation the mall would not a hieve the long term community and economic objectives of the Anaheim Wecific Plan Further additional and significant transportation and circulation impacts would occur with this alternative in comparison to the proposed project Reduced Proiect Scale Alternative This alternative eliminates the future third theme park from the Future Expansion District and relocates the East Parking Area to the 81 acres located south of Katella Avenue Future Expansion District As adopted The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of a 5 lOO space parking area identified as the South Parking Area on approximately 25 acres of the northernmost portion of the Future Expansion District The parking facilities will include surface parking on the western portion of the District and a 5 level parking structure on the eastern portion ofthe Future Expansion District Reasons ror Rejecting this alternative rrom rurther Consideration The location of a multi story parking structure on the remaining 56acre agricultural parcel would generate significant impacts on adjacent residential properties The proximity ofthe structure to existing residential units would be a greater visual impact than the impact associated with hotel motel development under the proposed project due to the provision ofparking facilities adopted as part ofThe Disneyland Resort Specific Plan there is no substantiated need for additional public parking facilities beyond those anticipated to be provided by the Intermodal Transportation Center and other surface parking facilities 01834 5 4 Alternatives to the Proposed Project CR 4 eRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Increased Proiect Scale Alternative This alternative features a larger third theme park in the Future Expansion District than the previously proposed third theme park analyzed as part of The Disneyland Resort Project This alternative analyzes development of a theme park on all 81 acres of The Future Expansion District including the 56 acres agricultural parcel potential impacts ofthis alternative would be similar in nature to those analyzed as part of the proposed project Refer to Section 5 7 of The Disneyland Resort EIR June 1993 However impacts associated with transportation and circulation air quality public services and utilities visual resources and aesthetics noise land use compatibility and energy are anticipated to be greater than those associated with the proposed project Under the provisions of the proposed Specific Plan a theme park use would be allowed by Conditional Use Permit This alternative has been retained for consideration by the decisionmakers Environmentallv SUllenor Alternative The Environmentally Superior Alternative will be selected from the alternatives described above The Environmentally Superior Alternative is an alternative that would result in the fewest or least significant environmental impacts and still achieve the objective of the planning effort The analysis of alternatives includes the base assumption that all applicable mitigation measures associated with the project would be implemented with the appropriate alternatives However applicable mitigation measures may be scaled to reduce or avoid the potential impacts of the alternative under consideration and may not precisely match those identified for the project as proposed If a specific potential impact is not raised within the discussion of an alternative it is because the effect is projected to be the same as associated with implementation ofthe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5 2 THE NOPROJECT CONTINUING DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE 5 2 1 DESCRIPTION OF NOPROJECf CONTINUING DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE The No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative assumes that adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would not take place and that land use designations development standards and regulations would remain as they pertain to the plan area today or with minor adjustments and as stated in the C R designation of the General Plan This alternative also assumes that the 489 7 acre Disneyland Resort Specific Plan proceeds as adopted and that the Hotel Circle Specific Plan is withdrawn or not approved This alternative may avoid some project related impacts both positive and negative as discussed below CRACRA S 5 5 Altemarives to the Proposed Project 01835 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Construction and operation of the various new developments within the proposed 5495 acre Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries hotels motels and accessory uses retail and other visitor serving uses would continue to occur but not under the guidance of a comprehensive plan The existing arrangement of hotels motels restaurants surface parking lots and recreational areas would remain or would be modified in accordance with the existing land use designations and zoning and development standards currently allowed under the existing C R Zone Under the No Project Continuing Development Alternative scenario it is anticipated that parcels within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area would continue to develop on a parcel by parcel basis Existing environmental conditions would remain as would existing zoning and land use designations Under this alternative property owners developers may continue to develop up to 75 units per parcel underabuilding permit but may seek additional density under conditional use permit a discretionary action Although it is not possible to quantify the potential range and scenario of development impacts under this alternative it is likely that the impacts generated by continuing development under existing codes may have many ofthe same impacts as development under existing code or could be greater without the guidance and comprehensive planning proposed Therefore these impacts would not be comprehensively mitigated as under the guidance of an adopted Mitigation Monitoring Plan Under the No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative the potential benefits associated with the proposed project would be lost including the coordination of infrastructure improvements between The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to serve the Anaheim Resort For example the public infrastructure improvements including transportationcirculation and roadway improvements storm drain and sewer system capacity improvements and other service and utility improvements to accommodate anticipated growth within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries would not be coordinated and balanced with projected growth for the area The existing visual setting would remain in place and implementation of the design elements of the Specific Plan including landscaping and building setbacks would not occur Without implementation of the Specific Plan individual property owners developers would likely be subject to preparation of individual project EIR documentation in order to environmentally clear a specific development proposed within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries 5 2 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF NoProjectContinuing Development Alternative Land UseRelated Plans and Policies Existing plans and policies would remain without proposed amendments 01836 eRA eRAS H AlreT7Ultives ro rhe Proposed ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Land Use Compatibility The existing land uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would continue under the existing C R Zone designations The No Project Continuing Development Alternative would not involve the coordination and or comprehensive transition of land uses to Commercial Recreation designated land uses The transition of prime agricultural farmland to Anaheim Resort uses may occur under this alternative as with the proposed project Development of allowed land uses in the surrounding area would require implementation ofsome ofthe committed and non committed traffic improvements identified in Section 3 3 The street improvements associated with the proposed project would not occur as proposed but might result in part in the future as developments within the project area occur Additional height and bulk compatibility problems would likely occur Transportation and Circulation Traffic transit and pedestrian conditions under the No Project Continuing Development Alternative would be equivalent to those described in Section 3 3 1 Transportation and Circulation Environmental Conditions With the continued increase of through traffic from other regions traffic congestion would be anticipated to be greater than would occur with implementation of the project intersection improvements described in Section 3 3 1 and in Section 3 3 Transportation and Circulation Mitigation Measures Air Oualitv Under the No Project Continuing Development Alternative short term construction related air quality impacts would increase in the area due to the nature of construction that would continue and the lack of comprehensive short term air quality mitigation measures Utility and stationary source emissions would continue to incrementally increase in accordance with individual parcel development In addition levels of both local and regional pollutants associated with mobile sources would substantially increase as local and through traffic on streets increased since the public infrastructure improvements including transportation circulation and roadway improvements and comprehensive air quality mitigation measures such as the local and regional VMT reductions that would be achieved through coordinated TOM measures would not be implemented in coherent or timely manner Noise Under the No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative short term construction related noise impacts would incrementally increase over existing levels consistent with individual parcel development However long term traffic construction and operational noise impacts would be much greater in the area because of the absence of the public infrastructure improvements including transportation circulation and roadway improvements that would redistributetraffic and enhance local circulation and the lack of a comprehensive noise mitigation program eRAeRA S 5 7 A te17li1lives to the Proposed Project 01837 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Geoloev Soils and Seismicitv No Specific Plan induced construction would occur with the No Project Continuing Development Alternative Land area would be developed but not as a direct result of Specific Plan implementation Soil settlement potentially associated with implementation of the Specific Plan would not occur Because of the project study area s location in the seismically active region of Southern California there would continue to be a significant potential for damage from groundshaking with development under the existing C R Code similar to the proposed Specific Plan Groundwater and Surface Rvdroloev The No Project Continuing Development Alternative may involve paving of currently undeveloped land under the existing C R Code and may therefore also affect groundwater recharge However because the development potential of parcels within the Anaheim Resort would be reduced under the existing C R Zone as compared to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan no significant groundwater recharge impacts are anticipated Pumping for irrigation would continue at agricultural lands Drainage amounts would remain at present condition EmDlovment PODulation and Rousine Because this alternative would result in continued development under the existing C R Code fewer hotel rooms would most likely result within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries Thus the No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative would likely result in fewer indirect jobs This alternative would result in fewer direct or indirect population and housing impacts since there would be fewer direct or indirect employees generating 1 h C Fe demand for housing As with the existing code and the proposed specific plan 1lobilehomes which currently exist are legal nonconforming uses Public Services and Utilities The benefits associated with the comprehensive and coordinated planning for the area including implementation of a Public Facilities Plan as proposed with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would be losl Under this alternative there would be no mechanisms to promote a balance between infrastructure public service and utilities capacity and the anticipated growth within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area Impacts to schools would be lessened with fewer indirect demands on population and housing The benefits associated with the programmed phasing of improvements would not be realized Hazardous Materials The No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative would continue to involve future construction of individual development projects and therefore would also disturb existing hazardous materials or expose workers to hazards from potential contamination as would implementation of the proposed Specific Plan Remediation if required would take place on a project by project basis but without the comprehensive mitigation measures as provided for with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan 01838 CR CRA 5 5 8 Alternatives to the Proposed ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Visual Resources and Aesthetics The No Project Continuing Development Alternative would not result in any new development that could unify development of the Specific Plan study area Project benefits from landscape signage and other development improvements and design guidelines would not occur Additionally the beneficial impacts associated with united design and development standards for future development projects would not occur Cultural Resources No prehistoric historic or archaeological resources have been recorded within a I mile radius of the Anaheim Resort therefore similar to the proposed Specific Plan no impacts are anticipated under the No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative Enemv The No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative Continuing Development would involve an increase in energy usage over existing conditions However as compared to the proposed Specific Plan the existing CoR Code permits less density of development by right within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries Thus energy usage would be reduced as compared to the proposed Specific Plan 5 3 MODIFlED LAND USE ALTERNATIVE 5 3 1 DESCRIPTION OF MODIFlED LAND USE ALTERNATIVE HOTEL CIRCLE The Modified Land Use Alternative Exhibit 5 1 assumes that the aforementioned 489 7 acre Disneyland Resort Specific Plan is implemented as adopted but that the same 6 8 acre Hotel Circle Specific Plan document is withdrawn not approved or not approved as proposed and that the 6 8 acres of property is included in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Alternative uses would be designated on the properties included within the portions of said Hotel Circle Specific Plan boundaries where uses designated in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan are currendy proposed Under this alternative the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would permit 1 103 hotel units within the Hotel Circle Specific Plan area which is the same hotel room density proposed under the Hotel Circle Specific Plan This density is based upon existing and approved hotel 654 rooms and development ofremaining parcels per the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Under this alternative the total number of acres within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would increase to a total of 556 3 CRAiCRA 5 5 9 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 01839 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Environmental impacts associated with development of the Hotel Circle Specific Plan were analyzed within the context of Cumulative Impacts Refer to Section 4 0 and as such the inclusion of these properties within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundaries would increase the total acres of land within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan but would not increase the total maximum hotel room density that is anticipated to occur by 2010 This alternative would not impact the sensitive balance between maximum density permitted and infrastructure capacity 5 3 1 Environmental Impacts of Modified Land Use Alternative Unclusion of Hotel Circle Specific Plan Area into Proiect Area Land UseRelated Plans and Policies Existing land use plans and policy impacts would be similar to those identified in the analysis of the proposed Specific Plan Mitigation measures identified for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would be implemented under this alternative and would reduce impacts I a level f tfi iri Land Use Compatibility This alternative would provide land uses similar to those of the proposed project but would include an additional 6 8 acres of hotelmotel uses Therefore land use impacts for the other components would be comparable to those identified for the proposed project Mitigation measures as proposed within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan including appropriate setbacks height limits design features and landscape treatments would reduce impacts beiO a level considered 0 significant Transportation and Circulation Traffic impacts associated with development of the Hotel Circle Specific Plan were analyzed in the context of cumulative impacts see Section 4 0 and therefore the inclusion of these parcels within the Anaheim Resort boundaries at the same density proposed in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan would not result in impacts above levels previously analyzed Therefore l t A nO Slgnificant impacts are expected with mitigation Air Quality Implementation of the Modified Land Use Alternative would have air quality impacts similar to those associated with the proposed project This alternative would not result in any significant localized CO impacts Further SO and PMIO emissions would not be significant However operational emissions of reactive organic gases nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide will exceed significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD This alternative would be consistent with the Regional Growth Management Plan and 1991 Air Quality Management Plan l ioise Under the Modified Land Use Alternative noise from vehicle trips would be similar to the proposed Specific Plan Proposed mitigation measures as identified in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan noise analysis would be required After mitigation no significant impacts are anticipated o o CR CR 4 5 10 Alremarives 10 rhe Proposed Projecr ---PAGE BREAK--- I e e i J ffi 17 u I I u I j J c Avenue o L 0j 1 n I r i lS I KaonoIW ijlf L u 00L2 i Y J2tt h J 777 i L j iL l ni i irdV wa i LL J Legend Ej Limit ofAnaheim Resort Development Nea I J L1 Development Area 2 o 1000 2000 fcct mI IIII i1 I t d A 6 ftJ Source SWA 3 16 94 mrI Mic hael jatcs Exhibir 5 1 Modified Land Use Alrernarive Horele 5 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Legendl CJ r acoa wes lo 0 lv yl i A u i n I i l J 1 2 I II j W L I 0 CIRCLE I e Freedman MJY I 1 Ii I 0 1018110 Avenue Olignment l i s E E 40 I document for om8 16 J r oomp p men I Kot oA e L to rz z 7 c c Ii L n n o o n HOTEL PoCI fCO Avenue 0 ml IIII Limit ofAnaheim Resort o 1000 2000 fcct C RDistrict Development Area I P RDistriCl Development Area 2 I Designated Future Alignment In General Plan Circulation Element If rD 1Itmtm 1InU Tht Dim l4rui RlIlm Spmfir PLl umlrn upunruti UJb rtUJrll ud 1 00010 1 100 ltr flntiI1 pomo fWtn Smn upl4 ttt UI bm w 4 VJ filJIU Designated fOr Future Extension in General Plan Circulation Element OTE Premencss ofbounduv lines and legend Jimncuons are not oact Scrce S JA 3 16 Q4 Rev Michael Brandman AssoCiates 8 Q4 ll 1Ii IJ J I h d B ndm n Exhibit 5 1 Modified Land Use Alternative Hotel I0550010 8 94 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EiR ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Geology Soils and Seismicity Soil settlement constraints would be comparable to those identified for the proposed project Impacts associated with groundshaking and seismic activity would be the same as for the proposed project Mitigation measures comparable to those required for the proposed project would be incorporated into this alternative Therefore impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance as for the proposed project Groundwater and Surface Hydrology Implementation ofthis alternative would have impacts similar to those identified for the proposed project Mitigation measures similar to those identified for the proposed project would be included in this alternative Thus no significant impacts would be anticipated Employment Population and Housing This alternative would produce a similar total number of jobs as the proposed project and probably a similar or higher proportion of full time and primary wage earners because of the potential increase in the number of hotel rooms developed The number and pattern ofindirect and induced employment would therefore also be marginally different As with the proposed project this alternative would produce no significant impacts on employment Demand for housing would be similar to the proposed project and would not be significant Resulting impacts on population would also be insignificant Public Services and Utilities The impact on public services and utilities would be increased when compared to the proposed project Similar mitigation measures would be required to those of the proposed project resulting in reduced utility consumption and demand for public services which would reduce impacts to a level below significance f s fIt lhr Y r 1s h 3J r iJ i I vl c 7 1 r 4r Lrl Pr H r1J J Hazardous Materials Impacts would be equivalent under the Modified Land Use Alternative to those associated with the proposed project because the study area for hazardous materials included all properties within the Anaheim Resort Implementation of the mitigation measures identified for the proposed project would reduce potential impacts for this alternative to below a level of significance Refer to Section 3 10 Hazardous Materials Compliance for a detailed discussion Visual Resources and Aesthetics The development of the Modified Land Use Alternative would result in intensification of the existing types of urban uses as would the proposed project The 6 8 acres of additional land area would be guided by the landscape design and setback standards identified in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Incorporation ofthe Hotel Circle Specific Plan parcels within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan boundary would likely result in similar beneficial impacts on the area as a result of the extensive landscaping and design features that would be required eRACRA S 5 12 Alrematives to the Proposed Project 01843 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Pian EIR Mitigation measures similar to hose identified for the proposed project would be included in this ou t c alternative Thus no significant impacts would be anticipated Refer to Section 3 11 Visual Resources and Aesthetics for a detailed discussion Cultural Resources No significant impacts are anticipated because no cultural resources have been found in the Anaheim Resort Further mitigation measures incorporated into the project would be incorporated into the Modified Land Use Alternative Refer to Section 3 12 Cultural Resources for a detailed discussion Energy Because more land area is included energy use could be increased under the Modified Land Use Alternative as compared to the proposed project As with the proposed project significant r c e h If e c c d rtd 5 4 id ine impacts would be antteipatea 8 88 triter impl@mentatiQP f prnj mitigation measun 3 Comparative Summary of the Modified Land Use Alternative Impacts The potential impacts to land use plans and policies transportation circulation population housing and employment opportunities public services and utilities geology soils and seismicity groundwater and surface hydrology hazardous materials energy and cultural resources would be comparable to the proposed project However impacts to land use compatibility visual resources and aesthetics noise and air quality would be generally greater than the proposed project 5 4 LOWER INTENSITY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE A YEAR 2000 SCENARIO This alternative assumes that the project limits development to implementation of the first stage of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan development Year 2 00 For this alternative analysis the assumption was made that aU approved hotel motel development within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be built by year 2000 approximately 1 000 hotel rooms Total buildout of the Specific Plan under this alternative would result in a total of approximately 12 190 hotel rooms by Year 2000 11 190 existing plus approximately 1 000 approved hotel rooms The analysis of Year 2000 impacts associated with this alternative are described in detail throughout Section 3 0 Environmental Conditions Environmental Impacts Mitigation Measures and Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts and Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts of this EIR e Although this alternative would result in fewer short and long term environmental impacts it would fail to achieve the City s long term community and economic objectives to establish an overall identity i o CR eRA 5 13 Allemanves 10 rhe Proposed projecr ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR and land use plan which is intended to maximize the area s potential while guiding future development and insuring a balance between growth and infrastructure within the Anaheim Resort 5 5 LOWER INTENSITY LAND USE ALTER IATIVE B YEAR 2008 SCENARIO 5 5 1 TION OF THE LOWER INTENSITY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE B YEAR 2008 SCENARIO This alternative incorporates the assumptions described in the Fiscal Analysis Technical Report prepared for the City oftnaheim April 1993 by EPS For this alternative analysis the assumption x S was made that by Year a there will be a total demand for approximately 16 200 hotel rooms or a net increase of approximately 5 000 hotel rooms in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The total demand for hotel roms in the Anaheim ResQrt Specific Plan area assumes that The Disneyland Resort is developed and operational by Year 9ll Total induced demand for hotel rooms within the Anaheim Resort which includes the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and Hotel Circle Specific Plan areas is approximately 22 000 to 24 000 depending on future levels of Convention Center activity and demand induced by The Disneyland Resort Project Implementation of this alternative would result in approximately one third fewer hotel rooms by the Year 2008 than the maximum number ofhotel rooms 27 508 by Year 2010 that would be permitted with the proposed project Additionally this alternative assumes tat the market demand exists for the additional 5 000 hotel roms 5 5 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF LOWER INTENSITY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE YEAR 2008 SCENARIO Land UseRelated Plans and Policies Existing land use plans and policies impacts would be similar to those identified in the analysis of the proposed Specific Plan Mitigation measures identified for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would be implemented under this alternative but would not reduce impacts below a level of significance The loss of prime farmland would result in asignificant impact as with the proposed project see Section 3 1 Land Use Related Plans and Policies for a complete description Land Use ComDatibililv This alternative would provide the same land uses to those ofthe proposed project but would reduce the scale ofpotential future development by approximately one third below that proposed in the Specific Plan Land use impacts associated with future development within the Specific Plan area would be anticipated to be less than those identified for the proposed project Mitigation measures as proposed within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan including appropriate CIWCRA S 5 14 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 01845 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR setbacks design features architectural standards and landscape treatments would reduce impacts but not to a level considered less than significant This alternative would result in significant and unmitigated impacts due to the development of 56 acres designated as prime farmland by the Soil Conservation Service as would the proposed project Transoortation and Circulation The number of total and peak hour trips would be expected to be reduced by the fewer number of hotel rooms ultimately developed under this alternative Trip generation would be less than for the proposed project The mitigation measures identified for the project would be required to reduce potential impacts although it is possible that due to the reduction in total development density some of the improvements identified for the proposed project would no longer be necessary As impacts occur mitigations will be put in place as necessary Since the proposed project s contribution to intersection deficiencies projected by year 2010 is marginal these same intersections would continue to be significantly impacted even after mitigation with development of this alternative Air Qualitv Due to fewer hotel rooms the utility consumption of the project would be less reducing stationary emissions from power plants and onsite stationary emissions but not to a level considered less than significant Implementation of this alternative would have air quality impacts less than but similar to those associated with the proposed project This alternative would not result in any significant localized CO impacts Further SOx and PMIO emissions would not be significant However operational emissions of reactive organic gases nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide will continue to exceed significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD This alternative would be consistent with the Regional Growth Management Plan and 1991 Air Quality Management Plan Neither the proposed project nor this alternative would result in unavoidable significant impacts on air quality from direct mobile sources Noise Under this alternative noise from vehicle trips would be reduced in comparison to noise levels identified with the proposed Specific Plan The proposed reduction in the number of hotel rooms would incrementally reduce the project related traffic and therefore will reduce traffic noise With the exception of construction related noise impacts neither noise levels from the proposed project nor this alternative would be significant The mitigation measures as identified in the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan noise analysis would be required for this alternative After mitigation no significant impacts are anticipated GroI02V Soils and Seismicitv Soil settlement constraints would be comparable to those identified for the proposed project Impacts associated with groundshaking and seismic activity would be the same as for the proposed project Mitigation measures comparable to those required for the proposed f eRA CRA 5 15 Alcema ives CO che Proposed Project ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR project would be incorporated into this alternative Therefore impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance as for the proposed project Groundwater and Surface Hvdrolo2v Implementation of this alternative would have impacts similar to those identified for the proposed project Mitigation measures similar to those identified for the proposed project would be included in this alternative Thus no significant impacts would be anticipated EmDlovment PODulation and Housin2 This alternative would produce approximately 12563 fewer jobs decrease of 69 percent than that of the proposed project and a lower proportion of full time and primary wage earners because of the fewer number of hotel rooms developed EPS 993 The number and pattern ofindirect and induced employment would only marginally be different since land uses would remain the same As with the proposed project this alternative would produce no significant impacts on employment Demand for housing would be less than the proposed project and would not be significant Resulting impacts on population would also be insignificant The fewer number of jobs associated with this alternative would result in lower VMT impacts and therefore a sl greater VMT saving than for the proposed project It is anticipated that the mitigation measure identified in Section 3 8 of this EIR would be required for this alternative Public Services and Utilities The reduction in the number of hotel rooms would reduce impacts on police and fire services Schools would be affected indirectly as with the proposed project Indirect and significant impacts to schools would be associated with this alternative This alternative would also incrementally reduce utility impacts No significant adverse impacts on public services or utilities would occur after mitigation with the exception of impacts to schools and landfills similar to that of the proposed project although reduced to reflect the scale of this alternative Benefits would be to a lesser scale Similar mitigation measures would be required to those of the proposed project resulting in reduced consumption and demand for public services which would reduce impacts to a level below significance Hazardous Materials Impacts would be equivalent to those associated with the proposed project because the study area for hazardous materials includes all properties within the Anaheim Resort regardless of the density andlor intensity of development activity Implementation of the mitigation measures identified for the proposed project would reduce potential impacts for this alternative to below a level of significance Refer to Section 3 10 Hazardous Material Compliance for a detailed discussion 5 16 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 01847 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Arwheim Reson Specific Plan EIR Visual Resources and Aesthetics The implementation of the Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative Vear 2008 Scenario would result in development of the same types of urban uses as would the proposed project but modified to reflect the scale of this alternative Implementation of this alternative would be guided by the development standards landscape design and setback standards identified in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The mitigation measures listed in Section 3 II would reduce almost all of the project impact of this alternative to below a level of significance However visual impacts to residential uses along the periphery of the Specific Plan area are anticipated with this alternative Cultural Resources No significant impacts are anticipated because no cultural resources have been found in the Anaheim Resort Further mitigation measures incorporated into the project would be incorporated into this alternative Refer to Section 3 12 Cultural Resources for a detailed discussion Enemv The energy demand would be decreased in relation to the proposed project because of the reduction in the number of hotel rooms Mitigation measures similar to those identified for the proposed project would be recommended for this alternative As for the proposed project no significant unavoidable impacts are anticipated 5 5 3 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF THE WWER INTENSITY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE B YEAR 2008 SCENARIO IMPACTS The potential impacts to Land Use Related Plans and Policies Land Use Compatibility Geology Soils and Seismicity Groundwater and Surface Hydrology Hazardous Materials Visual Resources and Aesthetics and Cultural Resources would be comparable to the proposed project Impacts to Transportation and Circulation Air Quality Noise Employment Population and Housing Public Services and Utilities and Energy would be anticipated to be reduced in comparison to the proposed project although not necessarily proportionate to the scale of this alternative This alternative would not result in the elimination of any significant adverse environmental impacts 5 6 ENVIRONMENTu TY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE CEQA requires that an Environmentally Superior Alternative be identified that is an alternative that would result in the fewest or least significant environmental impacts The No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative would induce impacts associated with continued development under the existing CoR Code and on a parcel by parcel basis but would not provide any coordinated improvements within the Anaheim Resort Some environmental effects such as land use compatibility traffic noise air quality and visual aesthetics could potentially be greater with CRAiCRA 5 5 17 Alternatives to the Proposed Project ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR implementation of the No Project Continuing Development Alternative Further the No ProjectContinuing Development Alternative is not capable of satisfying the City s objectives of creating an urban destination resort that features resort hotels restaurants and shopping opportunities nor would implementation of this alternative meet the long term demand for recreation and resort activities in the Anaheim Resort The Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative B Year 2008 would be the most environmentally superior of the alternatives analyzed This alternative would have similar impacts to land use plans and policies land use compatibility geology soils and seismicity groundwater and surface hydrology hazardous materials visual resources and aesthetics and cultural resources Implementation of this alternative would also result in reduced impacts to transportation and circulation air quality noise public services and utilities employment population and housing and energy although not necessarily proportionate to the scale of the alternative However this alternative is not capable of eliminating any significant adverse effects nor will it reduce the level of significance of any of the identified environmental impacts The fewer number of hotel rooms that would be permitted with adoption of this alternative would generate less of a taX base and associated revenues from which to fund public services and utilities and other public infrastructure improvements to the Anaheim Resort This alternative would not provide the public benefit associated with the intent of the economic objectives such as to increasing sales tax yields and further enhancing the economic base ofthe community thereby lessening the tax burden on real property This alternative would result in the generation of fewer jobs within the Anaheim Resort due to the fewer number of hotel motel rooms that would be ultimately developed Implementation of this alternative would impede many of the community and economic objectives as stated in Section 2 2 Project Objectives CRACRA 5 5 18 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 01849 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e SECTION 6 0 TIlE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT TERM USES OF TIlE El VIRONMENT AND TIlE MAINTENANCE Ac ID ENHANCEMENT OF LONGTERM PRODUCTIVITY To provide an analysis of the relationship between the short term uses and long term productivity of the environment CEQA encourages a description of the cumulative and long term environmental effects of the proposed project particularly those that narrow the range of beneficial uses or pose long term risks to health and safety and the reasons why the project sponsor believes the project to bejustified at the present time The environmental effects of the proposed project and the cumulative effects of reasonably anticipated growth are discussed in Sections 3 0 and 4 0 of this EIR and are summarized in Section 1 0 The significant long term impacts are identified in Section 7 0 The potential health and safety risks posed by the proposed project either are not significant or would be mitigated to below a level ofsignificance by implementation of the mitigation measures that have been incorporated into the project andlor recommended in this EIR Currently the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is developed with three primary existing land uses hotelmotel restaurant and retail As a result the project area has already been dedicated to urban oriented recreational and convention center uses The proposed project would facilitate the expansion intensification of these land uses within the project area Implementation of the project would implement a long term strategy for enhancing the development potential of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and the recently adopted Disneyland Resort Specific Plan have been coordinated by the City to ensure that the overall City initiated goals for continuing development of convention theme park hotelmotel and visitor serving uses enhancing the aesthetic conditions in the Anaheim Resort through standards for design landscaping and signage and coordination of infrastructure improvements can be achieved The coordination and implementation of these two plans is considered to be both complementary and mutually beneficial to the Anaheim Resort Implementation of the Specific Plan represents a step toward achieving the goals of the City of Anaheim which include comprehensively planning for the area s continuing growth and development and establishing the area as an international lestination oriented resort The implementation of the Specific Plan would continue to enhance the area as a highly urbanized environment incorporating commercial entertainment and recreation uses As part of an urbanized area the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area does not contain sensitive natural resources such as wetlands endangered species or riparian habitat Therefore development of the e 6 1 The Relationship Between Short Term and Long Term Productivity CRA CRA 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR project would not create substantial shon term loss of imponant natural resources as the trade off for its long term economic productivity The proposed Specific Plan would facilitate an increase in the area s economic productivity in terms of increased revenues to the City County and State Implementation of the Specific Plan may therefore be considered an enhancement to long term productivity in terms of land use efficiency Because of the large monetary commitment required to provide the infrastructure and preliminary planning framework for implementation offuture specific development proposals as well as the City s goal for continued enhancement of the Anaheim Reson it is unlikely that the Specific Plan area would reven to a less intensive land use The CEQA Guidelines state that this section should describe the reasons that the project proponent believes the project to be justified at the present time The following discussion is provided in accordance with this CEQA provision The City of Anaheim as project proponent believes that the proposed Anaheim Reson Specific Plan project is justified now for a number of reasons These reasons are reflected in the objectives of the proposed project see Section 2 0 Project Description of this EIR and in the proposed Anaheim Reson Specific Plan see Section 10 Executive Summary and Section 2 0 Planning Context of the Specific Plan document refer to Appendix B of this EIR bound under separate cover The proposed project would build upon the existing development within the Anaheim Reson including the City of Anaheim Convention Center and the existing Disneyland Theme Park and accommodate a broader range of hotelmotel accommodations and increased opportunities for retail shopping and dining An imponant aspect of the project s success will be the synergy created by numerous hotel opportunities and visitor serving facilities in proximity to the rest of the Anaheim Reson including the Anaheim Convention Center and the recently approved Disneyland Reson Specific Plan Implementation of the project pursuant to the proposed Specific Plan will guide development in a visually cohesive manner with extensive landscaping setback and signage regulations both within and along the perimeter of the Anaheim Reson Specific Plan area The proposed Anaheim Reson Specific Plan is expected to indirectly provide substantial long term benefits to the community and the public It will enable the revitalization and enhancement of the long term economic productivity of the area by inducing jobs and substantial tax revenues and is expected to stimulate economic vitality in the surrounding areas O 85 CRA CRA 6 6 2 The Relarionship BeTWeen Shon Term and Long Term Productivity e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Implementation of the proposed project will provide the framework for major infrastructure improvements and will provide and or indirectly generate a substantial portion of the funding necessary to complete major improvements to the City of Anaheim s transportation and circulation systems and to the public services and utilities systems If the proposed project is not approved and implemented it is anticipated that parcels within the boundaries of the Specific Plan area would continue to be developed under the existing Commercial Recreation zoning code on a parcel by parcel basis without comprehensive planning guidance e CRAlCRA 6 63 The Relationship Between Shan Term and Long Term Productivity ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR SECTION 7 0 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE EJliVIRONMENTAL CHANGES THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED IN TIlE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED The environmental effects of the proposed project are discussed in Section 3 0 of this EIR and summarized in Section 1 0 Implementation of the proposed project would require the long term commitment of natural resources and land as discussed below Approval and implementation of actions related to implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would result in an irretrievable commitment of nonrenewable resources such as energy supplies and other construction related resources These energy resource demands would be used for construction heating and cooling of buildings transportation of people and goods to and from the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area heating and refrigeration for food preparation and water as well as lighting and other associated energy needs Inasmuch as fossil fuels currently are the principal source of energy it can be stated that implementation of development projects within the Specific Plan boundaries will directly reduce existing supplies of fuels including fuel oil natural gas and gasoline It has been forecast that the proposed project would consume approximately 161 million kWh ofelectricity 508 730 MBTU of natural gas annually and additional vehicular fuel This represents a long term commitment to consumption of an essentially nonrenewable resource The implementation of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would require the commitment or destruction of other nonrenewable and slowly renewable resources These resources include but are not limited to lumber and other forest products sand and gravel asphalt petrochemical construction materials steel copper lead and other metals water etc An increased commitment of public maintenance services waste disposal and treatment etc would also occur The majority of the Specific Plan area is currently developed but there is one remnant agricultural area that is proposed for development The loss of this agricultural resource including prime agricultural soils in this case would be a significant irreversible environmental change It should be noted however that this agricultural area is designated for urban development in the City of Anaheim General Plan so its removal is consistent with local community planning eRAeRA 7 7 1 SignijicanJ Irreversible Environmental Changes Thal Would Be Involved in Ihe Proposed Action Should II Be Implemented 01853 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR e SECTION 8 0 GROWTH INDUCING IlIPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTIONS This section of the EIR analyzes the potential environmental consequences of the foreseeable growth and development of the surrounding area that would be induced by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan To a great extent the potential growth that may be induced by implementation of the proposed plan is discussed in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts and other previous sections of this EIR Therefore where appropriate the following discussion summarizes the relevant analysis and provides cross references to guide the reader to environmental analyses located elsewhere in the EIR As described below implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan may induce growth of various kinds including economic growth in the City of Anaheim new construction and other jobs in the region population growth in the Southern California region It is anticipated that the Anaheim Resort will experience substantial economic growth in the future as an indirect result ofthe proposed plan and other municipal planning efforts such as future Convention Center betterment programs and the recently approved Disneyland Resort Specific Plan The intent of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be to integrate commercial recreation land uses including family oriented entertainment businesses lodging recreation and other touristvisitor support services and facilities Ifadopted the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would allow commercial growth consistent with the plan to revitalize the area enhance the economic base of the City and increase local employment opportunities The growth that may be expected to occur in the foreseeable future through 2010 in the area surrounding the proposed project area is described and analyzed in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts Growth anticipated within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would be consistent with the types of land uses allowed in the Anaheim Resort as described in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts Therefore although the proposed Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is anticipated to induce the future development of hotels and other commercial uses the growth would be consistent with the growth projections for the Anaheim Resort Implementation of individual development projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area would directly create a number of new employment opportunities in the City of Anaheim and throughout the Southern California region Construction jobs in Anaheim and throughout the region e CRA CRA 8 8 1 Growth Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Actions ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR would be created as a direct result of the project Jobs associated with the operation of the newly developed uses within the Anaheim Resort would also be created as the project area develops In addition otherjobs in a wide variety of sectors of the local and regional economies would be induced as an indirect result of the implementation of the project The numbers of construction and other related jobs generated by the project cannot be calculated at this state of project development as the individual developments and timing within the Anaheim Resort is not known however the influence of the proposed project on the job market is not expected to generate significant growth beyond the growth assumed in regional plans As discussed in Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing considering both in migrating and intraregional relocation it is estimated that a maximum of 2 505 employees 7 766 new residents at 3 I persons per household will seek housing in Anaheim as a result of employment in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan These people would comprise approximately 21 percent of the 1990 20I0 population growth projected for the City The project could also indirectly induce effects on population elsewhere within the region Therefore the potential demand for public services and utilities that would be generated by this induced population growth would be well within the forecasted growth and infrastructure improvements in local and regional pfans including public service plans to accommodate forecasted growth As discussed in Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing it is anticipated that the jobs indirectly induced by the project would in turn induce demand for additional housing units within the region However it is infeasible to calculate the size of households wage earner status and the choice of housing location of the employees in the jobs that may be indirectly induced by the implementation of the proposed project Therefore it would be speculative to try to predict the number and location of housing units generated by the employment opportunities that may be indirectly induced by implementation of the proposed project However because the proposed project and the potential growth that would be indirectly induced by implementation of the proposed project are well within the local and regional growth forecasts as described in Section 3 I Land Use Related Plans and Policies and Section 3 8 Employment Population and Housing it is anticipated that the indirect effects associated with the provision of housing would also be within these forecasts In addition to the potential induced growth discussed above it is conceivable that certain aspects of the proposed Specific Plan would remove barriers to growth ofnew uses or expansion of existing uses in the surrounding area For example implementation ofthe proposed Specific Plan will provide for certain public infrastructure improvements that may providecapacity in excess of the current demand eRA eRA 8 2 GrOWTh Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Actions 01855 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e The additional capacity may be provided to adequately serve the reasonably anticipated growth within the service or study areas as discussed in Section 4 0 Cumulative Impacts The growth that may be induced by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan is anticipated to be only a portion of the buildout of the projects currently under consideration and or review for the surrounding area including the buildout of the recently adopted Disneyland Resort and is consistent with adopted growth projections for the region Thus the analysis of the cumulative effects of the proposed project plus the development of the surrounding area subsumes the potential environmental impacts associated with the growth that may be induced by the proposed project Rather than repeating the detailed analysis of cumulative impacts the reader is referred to Section 4 0 of this EIR Cumulative Impacts e 8 3 Growth Inducing Impacls of lhe Proposed Actions CRAiCRA 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR SECTION 9 0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED 9 1 CITY OF ANAHEIM City Anorney s Office Selma Mann Community Development Department Lisa Stipkovich Bertha Chavoya Convention Center Lynn Thompson Consulting City Anorney Tom Winfield Josh Gonheim Fire Department Fire Marshall Timothy Riley Gary Wilder Janet Baylor Maintenance Department Doris Roush Rod Hallock Parks Recreation and Community Services Jack Kudron Dick Mayer Planning Department Code Enforcement Division John W Poole Planning Department Planning Division Greg McCafferty Sean Gerber Debbie Fank Police Department Officer Stanley Kanter Officer Buddy Jacob Public Utilities Department Ed Aghjayan Consumer Services Darrell Amant Financial Services Mike Bell Water Services Ed Alario Diem Vuong Bruce Bowman Electrical Services Brian Brady J afar Taghavi Public Works Department Trafficffransponation Alfred Yalda Design Division Mark Komoto Ralph Harp Subdivision Section Natalie Meeks 9 2 OTHER AGENCIR Anaheim City School District M Strickland Maria Elena Romero Special Counsel Best Best Krieger John Brown Dina Harris Anaheim Unified High School District Rita S Newman California Department of Transponation District 12 Al Fisher California Department of Water Resources Bob Fingado CJlAJCllA9 9 1 Organizarions and Persons Consulted 01857 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR California Archaeological Information Center Dorothy Uyehara Ashley Shaw Ken Kurkup Dave Kodova California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology Greg Poseley Molly Penburst California Regional Water Quality Control Board D Gildersteeve K Williams Orange County Cultural and Historic Planning Mary Goss Orange County Flood Control District Dick Runge Orange County Integrated Waste Management David Grauer Orange County Sanitation Districts Tom Dawes Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region Dan Pirotton South Coast Air Quality Management District Joe Casmassi Steve Smith Southern California Association of Governments Mark Pisano 9 3 PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS California Institute of Technology Seismology Lab Heidi Aspaturian Multivision Cable Company Bill Snyder Pacific Bell Telephone Company T F Dean Southern California Gas Company Doug Jelinek Southern California Edison Company Wayne Milner 01858 CRA CR 9 9 2 Organizations and Persons ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan SECTION 10 0 BIBLIOGRAPHY The documents which are specifically incorporated by reference are available for public review at the City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim California 92805 Other documents which served as secondary resource material for this EIR are made available by request to the City of Anaheim Planning Department The ErR appendices are available for public review at Anaheim Public Libraries and are available for review and or purchase at the City of Anaheim Planning Department during the period of public review of the Draft ErR 1 e t Y I Anaheim City of 1977 The City of Anaheim Council Policv No 542f W QK e J 2 5 Anaheim City of 1978 Noise Element of the General Plan Anaheim City of 1984 City of Anaheim General Plan Anaheim City of 1990 City of Anaheim 1990 Traffic Census ReDor Anaheim City of 1991 ZoniOl Ordinance Anaheim City of City Council 1986 Heivht Standard Guidelines Mao Map 1124 Revised California Department of Health Services 1972 Model Community Noise Ordinance California Governor s Office Office of Planning and Research 1992 California Environmental Duality Act and Guidelines to the California Environmental Duality Act California State of 1976 Guidelines for the Preoaration and Content of Noise Elements of the General Plan California State of 1986 California Sound Transmission Control Standards California Code of Regulations Tide 24 Building Standards Chapter 2 5Sound Transmission Control Part 2 as adopted March 1 1986 County of Orange Administrative Office Undated Oran2e County Proiections 1988 County ofOrange County Transportation Authority 1991 Oran2e County Con2estion Mana2ement e wl County of Orange 1988 County Growth Mana2ement Plan Element County of Orange 1991 Oran2e County General Plan CRAlCRA lO 10 1 Bibliography 01859 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Economic Planning Systems Inc 1993 Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Fiscal Analysis Technical Reoort Grauer David Staff Assistant for Operations Orange County Integrated Management Personal communication Telephone conversation May 23 1994 Institute of Transportation Engineers 1991 Trio Generation 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 1987 Trio Generation 4th Edition Michael Brandman Associates Association 1993 The Disneyland Resort EIR Moyer C and M Francis 1991 Clean Air Handbook A Practical Guide to Comoliance Clark Boardman New York New P D Technologies 1993 Final Draft Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Private Tour Bus Study Report 1 Existing Demands and Operations Characteristics P D Technologies 1993 Final Draft Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Tour Bus Study Report 2 Shuttle System and Central Terminal Facility South Coast Air Quality Management District 1978 A Climatoloeical Air Quality Profile California South Coast Air Basin South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality Data 1988 1992 Anaheim Air Monitoring Station South Coast Air Quality Management District 1992 Draft Air Quality Handbook for Preoarine Environmental Imoact Reoorts South Coast Air Quality Management District April 1993 CEOA Air OUality Handbook South Coast Air Quality Management District and Southern California Association of Governments 1989 Air Quality Manaeement Plan South Coast Air Basin South Coast Air Quality Management District and Southern California Association of Governments 1991 1991 Air Quality Manaeement Plan South Coast Air Basin Southern California Association of Governments 1989a Reeional Mobility Plan Southern California Association of Governments 1989b Reeional Growth Manaeement Plan Southern California Association of Governments 1989c Reeional Forecasts Southern California Association of Governments 1990 Guidance for Imolementation of 1989 AOMP Conformity Procedures e 01860 10 2 Bibliography eRA eRA ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan SWA Group The 1993 The Disnevland Resort Soecific Plan SP92 L Final June 29 1993 City of Anaheim U S Bureau of the Census 1989 Statistical Abstract of the United States 1989 109th Edition U S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1978 Hi hwav Noise Prediction Model FHWA RD 77 108 U S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1981 FHWA Sound Procedures for Measurin Hi hwav Noise Final Report DP 45 1 R U S Environmental Protection Agency 1971 Noise from Construction EquiDment and Ooerations Buildin Eauioment and Home ADDliances U S Soil Conservation Service 1978 Soil Survey ofOran e County CRAiC IO 103 Bibliography 01861 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e SECTION 110 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL ILl CITY OF ANAHEIM City Administration Deputy City Manager Tom Wood Planning Depanment Planning Director Joel Fick Deputy Planning Director Mary McCloskey Senior Planner Lucy Yeager Senior Planner Linda Johnson Associate Planner Debbie Fank Assistant Planner Sean Gerber City Attorney City Attorney Jack White Deputy City Attorney Selma Mann Consulting Attorney Tom Winfield Josh Gottheim 14 Public Works Engineering Depanment Director Gary Johnson Deputy City Engineer Russell Maguire Traffic and Transportation Manager John Lower 11 2 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Principal in Charge Joan Patronite Kelly AICP Project Manager Laura Worthington Forbes Environmental Analysis Tina Anderson Jason Brandman Roben Matson Leslea K Meyerhoff AICP Jodi S Schriefer Susanne Zechiel Hazardous Material Assessment Julie Gaa Noise Assessment Tung chen Chung Ph D Graphics Carl Workman e 11 1 Repon Preparation Personnel CRAlCRA 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan Word Processing Chris Alzua Charlene Kortgard Editing Andrea Joyles Clark Bernadette Mezzacappa 11 3 TECHNICAL SUBCONSULTANTS Air Quality Analysis JoAnne Aplet JHA Environmental Tra k c 1tJ 1 J S Kendall Elmer Austin Foust Traffic Analysis Tour Bus Study Joanne Lombardo P D Technologies 01863 eRA eRA 11 11 2 Repon PreparaJion Personnel e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e SECTION 12 0 GLOSSARY This glossary is provided to the reader as a reference These summaries are not intended as comprehensive definitions and the terms should be considered in the context in which they are used Because ofthe many sources of technical information several terms and conventions have been used throughout the document A WEIGHTED DECIBEL SOUND LEVEL dBA See decibel A Weighted ACRE FOOT A unit of volume usually water equal to a one acre area covered with I foot of water or 325 900 gallons AIR QUALITY MODEL An algorithmic relationship between pollutant emissions and pollutant concentrations used in the prediction of a project s pollutant impact AIR TOXICS Any air pollutant for which a national ambient air quality standard NAAQS does not exist ie excluding ozone carbon monoxide PMI0 sulfur dioxide nitrogen dioxide that may reasonably be anticipated to cause cancer developmental effects reproductive dysfunctions neurological disorders heritablegene mutations or other serious or irreversible chronic or acute health effects in humans AMBIENT CONDITIONS Initial background concentration sensed measured at a monitoring sampling site as in air quality or noise AMBIENT NOISE The background noise associated with a given environment usually a composite of sounds from many sources near and far AQUIFER A natural underground formation that is saturated with water and from which water can be stored or withdrawn See confined aquifer ARTERIAL HIGHWAY A vehicular public right of way whose primary function is to carry through traffic in a continuous route across an urban area while also providing some access to abutting land AT GRADE CROSSING The crossing of two channels of transportation at the same elevation or level ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY The resistance to or enhancement of vertical air movement related to the vertical temperature profile AIT AINMENT AREA An area considered to have air quality as good as or better than the National Ambient Air Quality Standard as defined in the Clean Air Act An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a nonattainment area for others e CRAlCRA I2 12 1 Glossary ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ADT The number of vehicles passing a given point on a road going in a direction during a 24 hour period A VERAGE VEHICLE RIDERSHIP AVR Average number of people per vehicle of the total number of vehicles arriving at a certain destination BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION Air pollutant concentration due to natural sources and distant unidentified man made area sources BERM An earthen embankment Berms can function as visual screens noise attenuators and surface water diverters CARBON MONOXIDE CO A colorless odorless gas that is toxic because of its tendency to reduce the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood CLEAN FUELS Additive blends and or substitutes for gasoline fuels including compressed natural gas methanol ethanol and others CLOSED SYSTEM A system in which input and output of one element to a similar adjacent system is limited or not possible COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVEL CNEL Represents a time weighted 24 hour average noise level based on the A weighted decibel The CNEL scale includes an additional 5 dB reduction adjustment to sounds occurring in the evening 7 00 p m to 10 p m and a 10 dB reduction adjustment to sounds occurring in the late evening and early morning hours between 10 00 p m and 7 00 a m COMPOSTING Composting of solid waste provides a means of recovering portions of the inorganic and the organic segments of the waste stream It is a biological process in which organic substances are converted into a humus like material The compost when added to the soil is capable of improving the tilth water holding and nutrient holding capacity of the soil CONFINED AQUIFER An aquifer bordered above and below by impermeable soil layers also known as artisan aquifer CONTIGUOUS Lands or legal subdivisions having a common boundary lands having only a common corner are generally not contiguous CRITERIA POLLUTANT A pollutant for which EPA has established a National Ambient Air Quality Standard CULTURAL RESOURCES Physical remains ofhuman activity that are sufficiently old to have value in characterizing culture Includes remains from both historic and prehistoric periods 01865 Glossary eRA CRA 12 12 2 e e e I ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e CUMULATIVE IMPACT As defined by CEQA cumulative impacts refers to two or more individual effects that when considered together are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts The individual effects may be changes resulting from a single project or a number of separate projects The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment which results from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past present and reasonable foreseeable probable future projects Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time DAY NIGHT AVERAGE SOUND LEVEL Ldn The A weighted average sound level in decibels during a 24 hour period with a 10 dB weighing applied to nighttime sound levels 10 p m to 7 a m This exposure method is similar to the CNEL but deletes the evening time period 7 p m to 10 p m as a separate factor DECIBEL dB A unit for expressing the relative intensity loudness of sounds The decibel is the logarithm ofthe ratio of the intensity of a given sound to the faintest sound discernible by the human ear DECIBEL A WEIGHTED dBA A weighting is a frequency correction that correlates overall sound pressure levels with the frequency response of the human ear DESIGN CAPACITY The capacity at which a street water distribution pipe pump or reservoir or a wastewater pipe or treatment plant is intended to operate DIRECT EMPLOYMENT In reference to a particular project employment provided by that project DISPERSION The process by which atmospheric pollutants disseminate because of wind and vertical stability DROUGHT TOLERANT An adjective used to describe any plant species that is capable of surviving with little or no water for extended periods EASEMENT A right given by the owner of land to another party for specific limited use of that land An easement may be acquired by a government through dedication when the purchase of an entire interest in the property may be too expensive or unnecessary EMINENT DOMAIN The legal right of government to acquire or take private property for public use or public purpose upon paying just compensation to the owner EMISSION FACTOR The rate at which pollutants are emitted into the atmosphere by one source or a combination of sources ENVIRONMENT The physical conditions that exist within the area that will be affected by a proposed project including land air water minerals flora fauna ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance The area involved shall be the area in which significant effects would occur either directly or indirectly as a result of the project The environment includes both natural and man made conditions e CRAlCRA I2 12 3 Glossary ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EQUIVALENT NOISE LEVEL Leq A single number representation ofthe fluctuating sound level in decibels over a specified period of time It is a sound energy average of the fluctuating level EROSION The process by which material is removed from the earth s surface including weathering dissolution abrasion and transportation most commonly by wind or water FAULT A fracture in the earth s crust forming a boundary between rock masses that have shifted An active fault is a fault that has moved recently and that is likely to do so again An inactive fault is a fault that shows no evidence of movement in recent geologic time and no potential for movement in the relatively near future FOOTPRINT Building The outline of the ground area covered by abuilding GENERAL PLAN A compendium of city or county policies regarding long term development in the form of maps and accompanying text The General Plan is a legal document required of each local agency such as the City of Anaheim by the State of California Government Code Section 65301 and adopted by the City Council or Board of Supervisors GLARE A light source either reflected or direct that may be annoying or distracting GRADING Alteration of existing slope and shape of the ground surface GRA VITY FED An adjective used to describe a water distribution or wastewater collection system that relies on gravity to move the fluids through pipelines GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE The total square footage of a building or structure including the exte ior walls of all floors GROUNDWATER Water under the earth s surface often confined to aquifers GROUNDWA TER RECHARGE The natural process of infiltration and percolation of rainwater from land areas or streams through permeable soils into water holding rocks that provide underground storage Le aquifers Also refers to the process by which public agencies return water to aquifers HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE HOV A motor vehicle that is carrying at least a minimum specified number of passengers normally at least two or more sometimes three Of more It can be a bus a taxi with passengers or a car or van used for carpooling An HOV lane is a special lane dedicated to HOVs HYDROCARBONS HC These gases represent unburned and wasted fuel They come from incomplete combustion of gasoline and from evaporation of petroleum fuels IMPACT Effects and impacts are usually synonymous Direct or primary effects are caused by the project and occur at the same time and place indirect or secondary effects are caused by the project and are later in time or farther removed in distance but are still reasonably foreseeable Indirect or secondary effects may include growth inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the panem of land use population density or growth rate and related effects on air and water and other natural systems including ecosystems 01867 CRA CRA l 12 4 Glossary e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e IMPERVIOUS SURFACE Ground surface that cannot be penetrated by water Includes paved and compacted surfaces as well as those covered by buildings INDIRECT EMPLOYMENT In reference to a panicular project employment provided by businesses that sell goods and services to the reference project INDIRECT IMPACT Effects caused by an action that are later in time or farther removed in distance but are still reasonably foreseeable Indirect effects may include growth inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of land use population density or growth rate and related effects on air and water and other natural systems including ecosystems INDIRECT SOURCE Any structure or installation that attracts an activity that creates emissions of pollutants For example a major employment center a shopping center an airport or a stadium can all be considered to be indirect sources INDUCED EMPLOYMENT In reference to a panicular project employment provided by businesses that sell goods and services to employees of the reference project INFILTRATION The introduction of underground water such as groundwater into wastewate collection systems Infiltration results in increased wastewater flow levels INFRASTRUCTURE Permanent utility installations including roads water supply lines sewage collection pipes and power and communications lines INITIAL STUDY Under CEQA a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency to determine whether an EIR or a Negative Declaration must be prepared to identify the significant environmental effects to be analyzed in an EIR INTERSECTION CAPACITY The maximum number of vehicles that has a reasonable expectation of passing through an intersection in one direction during a given time period under prevailing roadway and traffic conditions INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ICU METHOD A method of analyzing intersection level of service by calculating a volume to capacity V IC ratio for each governing critical movement during a traffic signal phase The VIC ratio for each phase is summed with the others at the intersection to produce an overall VIC ratio for the intersection as a whole The VIC ratio represents the percent of intersection capacity used For example a VIC ratio of 0 85 indicates that 85 percent of capacity is being used INVERSION LAYER An atmospheric condition in which the air temperature increases with increasing altitude holding cooler surface air down along with its pollutants KILOWAIT A measure of the rate of electrical flow equal to 1 000 watts KILOWAIT HOUR A measure of a quantity of electrical consumption equal to the power of one kilowatt acting for 1 hour e 12 5 Glossary CRAlCRA I2 I ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan LANDFILL An area of land or an excavation in which wastes are placed for permanent disposal and that is not a land application unit surface impoundment injection well or waste pile LAND USE The purpose or activity for which a piece of land or its buildings is designed arranged or intended or for which it is occupied or maintained LEAD AGENCY The public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project The Lead Agency will decide whether an EIR or Negative Declaration will be required for the project and will cause the document to be prepared LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS The different operating conditions which occur in a lane or roadway when accommodating various traffic volumes A qualitative measure of the effect of traffic flow factors such as special travel time interruptions freedom to maneuver driver comfort and convenience and indirectly safety and operating cost Levels of service are usually described by a letter rating system of A through F with LOS A indicating stable traffic flow with little or no delays and LOS F indicating excessive delays and jammed traffic conditions LIQUEFACTION A geologic phenomenon in which surface and near surface materials soils alluvium etc behave like a liquid during seismic shaking often causing failure of soils to support structures MAXIMUM CREDIBLE EARTHQUAKE The maximum earthquake that appears capable of occurring under the presently known seismic conditions MAXIMUM PROBABLE EARTHQUAKE The maximum earthquake that is likely to occur during a tOO year interval MITIGATION MEASURE Mitigation includes avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation rectifying the impact by repairing rehabilitating or restoring the affected environment reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance during the life of the action and compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments MOBILE SOURCES A source of air pollution that is related to transportation vehicles such as automobiles or buses MODE SPLIT The methods of transportation assumed to travel a trip Ie walking bicycling single ccupant automobile carpooling automobile vanpool vehicle shuttle bus bus etc MODIFIED MERCALLI SCALE An earthquake intensity scale with twelve divisions from I not felt by people to XII nearly total damage 01869 eRA CRA 12 lHi Glossary e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE All solid wastes generated by residential commercial industrial governmental and institutional sources at construction and demolition sites at food processing facilities and at treatment works for water and waste water which are collected and transported under the authorization of a jurisdiction or are self hauled Municipal solid waste does not include agricultural crop residues animal manures mining wastes forestry wastes and ash from industrial boilers furnaces and incinerators NEGATIVE DECLARATION A written statement by the Lead Agency briefly describing the reasons that a proposed project not exempt from CEQA will not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore does not require the preparation of an EIR NITROGEN OXIDES NOJ Chemical compounds containing nitrogen and oxygen reacts with volatile organic compounds in the presence of heat and sunlight to form ozone It is also a major precursor to acid rain Nationwide approximately 45 percent of NO emissions come from mobile sources 35 percent from electric utilities and 15 percent from industrial fuel combustion NOISE BARRIER A wall or other solid structure constructed with the objective of attenuating ie reducing noise behind the barrier commonly a noise wall along a roadway NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOC A brief notice filed with the California Office of Planning and Research OPR by a Lead Agency when it has completed a draft EIR and is prepared to make it available for review NOTICE OF DETERMINATION NOD A brief notice to be filed by a public agency after it approves or determines to carry out a project that is subject to the requirements of CEQA NOTICE OF PREPARATION NOP A brief notice sent by a Lead Agency to notify the Responsible Agencies Trustee Agencies and involved federal agencies that the Lead Agency plans to prepare an EIR for the project The purpose ofthe notice is to solicit guidance from those agencies as to the scope and content of the environmental information to be included in the EIR Public agencies are free to develop their own formats for this notice OZONE 0 A compound consisting of three oxygen atoms that is the primary constituent of smog It is formed through chemical reactions in the atmosphere involving volatile organic compounds nitrogen oxides and sunlight Ozone can initiate damage to the lungs as well as damage to trees crops and materials There is a natural layer ofozone in the upper atmosphere that shields the Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation PMI0 The current standard for measuring the amount of solid or liquid matter suspended in the atmosphere particulate matter including dust Refers to the amount of particulate matter 10 micrometers or less in diameter The smaller PM 10 particles penetrate to the deeper portions of the lung affecting sensitive population groups such as children and people with respiratory diseases See total suspended particulates TSP PEAK HOURS In reference to transportation systems the hour or hours during which the greatest traffic flow occurs e eRAeRA 12 12 7 Glossary ---PAGE BREAK--- ATUlheim Reson Specific Plan PEAKING FACTOR An average factor determined by taking the average of the peak month water demand over a 4 year water purchase period In order to determine the highest average water demand at anyone given time this factor is then applied to the average peak month water demand to estimate projected peak month demand PERCENT SLOPE A common way of expressing the steepness of the slope of terrain whicb is derived by dividing the change in elevation by the horizontal distance traversed An increase of 20 feet in levation over a loo foot distance is a 20 percent slope PERCHLOROETHYLENE PCE A halogenated hydrocarbon used as a solvent a heat transfer medium and in the manufacture of fluorocarbons PERCOLATION Downward movement of groundwater through soil and bedrock PERMEABILITY That quality of the soil that enables it to transmit water or air PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG The atmospheric condition that results when reactive organic gases and nitrogen oxides emitted into the atmosphere react in the presence ofsunlight to form other pollutants such as oxidants POINT SOURCE A pollutant source that is fixed in location and that releases pollutants through a relatively small area such as an air emissions stack or a pipeline outfall PRECURSOR A chemical compound that leads to the formation of a pollutant Reactive organic gases and nitroen oxides are precursors of photochemical oxidants REACTIVE ORGANIC GASES ROG Classes olefins substituted aromatics and aldehydes that are likely to react with ozone and nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere to form photochemical smog RECYCLING Any of a variety of processes whereby waste is separated for reuse or reprocessing into a useful form RESPONSIBLE AGENCY A public agency which proposes to carry out or approve a project for which a Lead Agency is preparing or has prepared an EIR or Negative Declaration For the purposes of CEQA the term Responsible Agency includes all public agencies other than the Lead Agency that have discretionary approval power over the project RICHTER SCALE A logarithmic scale developed in 1935 36 by Dr Charles F Richter and Dr Beno Gutenberg to measure earthquake magnitude by the amount of energy released as opposed to earthquake intensity as determined by local effects on people structures and earth materials SEDIMENTATION Process by which material suspended in water is deposited in a body of water SEISMICITY The likelihood of an area being subjected to earthquakes or other earth movements SEISMOTECTONIC Seismic conditions arising from the convergence of two tectonic plates eRA eRA I 12 8 01871 Glossary e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e SHORING An excavation process that stabilizes vertical slopes as excavation continues deeper to minimize the surface disruption and minimize soil movement SIGNIFICANT IMPACT As defined by the California Environmental Quality Act a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land air water minerals flora fauna ambient noise and objects of historic or aesthetic significance An economic or social change by itself shall not be considered a significant effect on the environment A social or economic change related to a physical change may be considered in determining whether the physical change is significant A special street design and configuration program to increase street capacity and minimize congestion through measures such as light timing coordination and reduced driveways and cross streets SOLID WASTE Any nonhazardous garbage refuse or sludge which is primarily solid but may also include portions of liquid semi solid or contained gaseous material resulting from residential industrial commercial agricultural mining operations and community activities SOURCE SEPARATION A process in which solid waste materials are produced as an autonomous waste product that are stored separately at the site of generation or are physically separated from afl other solid wastes into recyclable compostable or other fractions at the site of generation SPEED PARKING A special parking procedure in which vehicles are directed to specific parking spaces and are not allowed to circulate freely in a surface parking lot or parking structure Such procedures are intended to expedite the parking of vehicles containing theme park visitors in order to reduce stacking of vehicles on public roads or streets and to minimize automobile idling time thereby significantly reducing air emissions STATIONARY SOURCE A source of air pollution that is not mobile such as a heating plant or an exhaust stack from a laboratory SULFUR DIOXIDE SO A heavy pungent colorless air pollutant formed primarily by the combustion of fossil fuels It is a respiratory irritant especially for asthmatics and is the major precursor to the formation of acid rain SURFACE WATER Water in lakes streams or rivers as distinct from subsurface groundwater THERM The amount of energy necessary to raise 100 000 pounds of water I degree FiihTenheit TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS A test method which identifies the presence and quantities of petroleum products as well as the general type of products and the general type of petroleum e g gasoline diesel TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATES TSP Air quality measurement of dust ash or other airborne inert particles e CRAlCRA I2 12 9 Glossary ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT TDM A program to consolidate person trips minimize vehicle trips Similar to a TSM program with a focus on shared or mixed uses onsite to reduce demand TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT TSM A program for encouraging alternatives to private automobile use such as increased reliance on public transit carpooling and bicycles TRICHLOROETHYLENE TCE A halogenated hydrocarbon used in metal degreasing dry cleaning operation refrigerants and fumigants TRIP The one way movement from origin to destination with each trip having two trip ends TRIP ASSIGNMENT The allocation of vehicle trips to available routes between locations in a traffic study area TRIP GENERATION The number of vehicle trip ends associated with Le produced by a particular land use or traffic study site A trip end is defined as a single vehicle movement Roundtrips consist of two trip ends TRUSTEE AGENCY A state agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a project that are held in trust for the people of the State of California Trustee Agencies generally include a The California Department ofFish and Game with regard to the fish and wildlife of the state to designated rare or endangered native plants and to game refuges ecological reserves and other areas administered by the department b The State Lands Commission with regard to state owned sovereign lands such as the beds of navigable waters and state school lands c The State Department ofParks and Recreation with regard to units ofthe State Park System d The University of California with regard to sites within the Natural Land and Water Reserves System VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED VMT A measure of both the volume and extent of motor vehicle operation the total number of vehicle miles traveled within a specified geographical area whether the entire country or a smaller area over a given period of time VEHICLE TRIP ENDS A single or one irection vehicle movement with either the origin or destination inside a traffic study site VIEWSHED The geographic area from which a site is visible a collection of viewpoints VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS VOCs A group of chemicals that react in the atmosphere with nitrogen oxides in the presence ofheat and sunlight to form ozone does not include methane and other compounds determined by EPA to have negligible photochemical reactivity Examples of VOCs include gasoline fumes and oil based paints 01873 CRAICRA 12 12 10 Glossary e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO C In reference to public services or transportation ratio of peak hour use to capacity WASTE STREAM Any and all waste that has been generated and is being processed toward permanent disposition WATERSHED The area of a landscape from which surface runoff flows to a given point WINDROSE A graphic depiction of average wind speed and direction over time e CRAlCRA IZ 12 11 Glossary ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR SECTION 13 0 ABBREVIAnONS This compilation of abbreviations is provided to the reader as a reference of terms commonly used in the EIR as abbreviations or acronyms AAM Annual Arithmetic Mean ABC Anaheim Barber Channel ACSD Anaheim City School District ADA Average Daily Attendance ADT Average Daily Traffic AFY Acre Feet per Year APCD Air Pollution Control District APSSZ Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone AQMD AQMP Air Quality Management District Air Qual ity Management Plan ASPIS Abandoned Site Program Information System AT SF Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe AUHSD Anaheim Union High School District AVR Average Vehicle Ridership BACT Best Available Control Technology BARCT Best Available Retrofit Control Technology BMP Best Management Practices BP Before Present CAA Federal Clean Air Act CALTRANS California Department ofTransportation CARB California Air Resources Board eRACRA IJ 13 Abbrevialions 01875 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR CCAA CCC CDMG CEPADT CEQA CERCLA CFR CIP CMP CNEL co co COCFG C R CSDOC dB dBA DEIR DHS DOE DOT DTSC EGGWC eRA CRA IJ California Clean Air Act Carbon Creek Channel Cal ifornia Depanment of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology California Environmental Protection Agency Cal ifornia Environmental Quality Act Comprehensive Environmental Responsibility Compensation and Liability Act Comprehensive Environmental Response and Liability Information System Code of Federal Regulations Capital Improvement Program Congestion Management Plan Community Noise Equivalent Level Carbon Monoxide Carbon Dioxide Central Orange County Fixed Guideway Commercial Recreation County Sanitation District of Orange County Decibel Decibel A Weighted Draft Environmental Impact Repon CEQA California Depanment of Health Services u S Depanment of Energy u S Depanment of Transponation Depanment of Toxic Substances Control East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel 01876 13 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan E1R ElR Environmental Impact Report CEQA EPA U S Environmental Protection Agency EPS Environmental Protection Section of the Anaheim Fire Department FAA Federal Aviation Administration FElR Final Environmental Impact Report CEQA FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIP Federal Implementation Program FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FTE Full Time Equivalent GMP Growth Management Plan gpd Gallons per day gpm Gallons per minute gsf Gross square feet HC Hydrocarbons HMC Hazardous Materials Compliance HOV High Occupancy Vehicle Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization KV M Kilovolts per meter kW Kilowatt kWh Kilowatt Hour LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission Ldn Day Night Average Sound Levels CRAlCRA I J 13 3 Abbreviations 01877 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR e Leq Leq LOS LOSSAN LRT LUST MBTU MG mgd MI MVA MWD NAAQS NIFZ NOC NOCLATS NOD NOP NO NO NPDES NPL 0 e eRAeRA 13 Equivalent Noise Level Hourly Sound Energy Average Level Level of Service Los Angeles San Diego Commuter Rail Corridor Light Rail Transit Leaking Underground Storage Tank Million British Thermal Units Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan Milligauss Million gallons per day Mercalli Intensity Million Volt Amperes Metropolitan Water District National Ambient Air Quality Standards Newport Inglewood Fault Zone Notice of Completion CEQA North Orange County Landfill and Alternative Technologies Study Notice of Determination CEQA Notice of Preparation CEQA Nitrogen Oxides Nitrogen Dioxide National Pollution Discharge Elimination System National Priorities List official list of hazardous waste sites Ozone 01878 134 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR OCEMA OCFCD OCHCA OCTA OCWD OPR OSHA Orange County Environmental Management Agency Orange County Flood Control District Orange County Health Care Agency Orange County Transportation Authority Orange County Water District Office of Planning and Research Occupational Safety and Health Agency Pb Lead PCB Biphenyls PCE PEARH PMIO ppm psi RECLAIM RHC Perchloroethylene also known as Tetrachloroethylene or Tetrachloroethene Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Required High Priority Particulate malter 10 micrometers microns or less in diameter Parts per million 10 by volume or weight Pounds per square inch Regional Clean Air Incentives Market Reactive Hydrocarbons ROC Reactive Organic Compounds ROO Reactive Organic Gases RMP RTD SCA SCAG SCAQMD Regional Mobility Plan Rapid Transit District Regional Water Qual ity Control Board South Central Area Southern California Association of Governments South Coast Air Quality Management District CRAlCRA 13 Abbreviations 13 5 01879 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Specific Plan EIR SCCRA SCE SCG SCS SDOC SF SIP so so STIP SWAT SWIS SWP TeE TDM TDS TMA Southern California Commuter Rail Authority Southern California Edison Company Southern CaI ifornia Gas Company United States Soil Conservation Service Sanitation Districts of Orange County Square feet State Implementation Plan Sulfur Dioxide Sulfur Oxide State Transportation Improvement Program Solid Waste Assessment Test Solid Waste Information System State Water Project State Water Resources Control Board Trichloroethylene also known as Trichloroethene Transportation Demand Management Total Dissolved Solids Transportation Management Association TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TSM Transportation Systems Management TSP TWA ugim e uSGS eRA eRA 1J Total Suspended Particulate Time Weighted Average Micrograms per cubic meter U niled Slales Geologic Survey 01880 13 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR UST Underground Storage Tank e USTC Underground Storage Tank Case V C Volume to Capacity Ratio VIM VollS per meter VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled VOC Volatile Organic Compounds VT Vehicle Trips 1 13 7 Abbreviations e CRACllA 13 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 e APPENDIX A NonCE OF PREPARATlONIINlTIAL mlDY AND COMMENT LllAKS e ---PAGE BREAK--- cm OF ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA Planning Department e SEPTEMBER 9 1991 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT THE ANAHEIM COMMERCIAL RECREATION C R AREA SPECIFIC PLAN The City of Al1ahcim will be the lead agency and will prepare a Program Impact Report EJR for the b h im Commercial Reacation C R Area Specific Plan the Projectj Agency commellU 011 the proposed project and the scope and COlltelll of the enwolIIDelltal infOrmatiOll are requested The project area ellcompasses appromnately 4835 acres of land in the City ofADaheim Commerc ial Recreation Area located generally of the I S Santa Ana Freeway betweCII Orangewood AYelluc and Vermont Street alld east of Walnut StreeL The Project study area sunoUllds two additional privately initiated specifie plan proposals which the City is processing of the CoR Area Specific Plan the SSOacre Disneyland Resort Specific PIu and the 6 5acre Hotel Circle Specific Plan Current land uses within the CoR Area Specific Plan Project area include the Anaheim CoIlYelltion Cellter hotels nd motels recreational Yebicle parks indUSlrial commercial retail parking Opell space goYernmenlal mobile home parks ollice quasi public uses residentia as wen as vacant land The proposed Project will identify subareas or districts and will establish land uses and developmelll standards design guidelines and all of public m lIe Y for ultimate It is also anticipated to include a range of land use dell5ities associated with botel motel deYelopmeDl with accessory uses for certain districts in the project area A more detailed descriptioll of the project and its locatiOD is provided in the attached Initial Study The related issues to be addressed in the draft Em will include but lIot be limited to the fonowing Aesthetics VlSual Resources Air Quality A1ternati cs Analysis Cultural and SciClltifie Resolll ces Cumulative Impact Earth Resources Geology Soils Seismicity Growth Inducing Impacts Hazardous Matcrials Compliance Hydrology Water Quality 1 andUsc Noise Public Semens and Utilities PopuIatiOll Employmelll Jobs Housing Balance Transportatioll Circulatioll In accordance with time limits mandated by State Law please send your response It the earliest possible date bur not later tban 30 days after receipt of this 1IOlice to Lucy Yeager at the address sbOWD below Thank you for your prompt respoasc U you baYe any quesliollS please Lucy Yeager at 714 254S139 Ext 5440 Attachment Noted AP1493LY Ms Lucy Yeager Scaior PlaMer City of Anaheim PlaMing Department 2IlO S Anabeim Blvd Anaheim CA 92l OS 11 Suulll Aualu im Huuk o mt 1 I 41X llwlIlI l llifunu l I I 71 J I i l t 1 e ---PAGE BREAK--- INITIAL ANAHEIM COMMERCIAL RECREATION AREA SPECIFlC PLAN e INTRODUcnON The City of Anaheim Cityis the Lead Agency responsible for preparing an impact report EIR for the actions related to implementation of the proposed Anaheim Commercial Recreation CR Area Specific Plan of which will Cllcompass approximately 4835 acres in south centra1 Anaheim The purpose of the proposed Specific Plan is to establish objectives policies land use and dcnsities and development standardsdesign guidelines for the systematic implementation of the General Plan for the area The City ofAnaheim General Plan dcsignat the subject area as Recreation which includes the types of uses istiog within and anticipated for the area additional discussion ofland uses provided below The C R Area Specific Plan is to elaborate and refine the General Plan framework and isting CR Zoning Code for the subject area The istinl CR Zoning Code currently permits privately initiated development of the Commercial Recreation Area However it is the intent of the City through adoption of a specific plan to be proactM and develop a visionary comprehensi1le all inclusive plan that addresses the potential cumulative effects of future development within the CoR Area An evaluation of the broad range of potential cumulative effects lencrated by development within the CR Area could not be as or accounted for on an individual project byproject basis The CR Area Specific Plan docs not propose any specific development projects for the area but rather is intended to provide guidance and consistency for future proposals within the C R Spccific Plan Area Future individual development proposals within the C R Specific Plan Area will be subject to further and review and as such are not individually addressed in this EIR Adoption of the C R Specific Plan would not directly result in impacts however future implementation of the Specific Plan c individual proposals being lUided and directed by the Specific Plan could indirectly result in impacts Potential environmental implCU of this nature cg impacts resulting from the implementation of a plan or program require consideration under the California Environmental Quality As CEQA The C R Area Specific Plan and associated actions necessary for the of the Specific Plan constitute a Projcct as defined by CEQA lUidelines and are cvaluated within this Initial Study e J08 OllS OOIOJS 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- The 483 5acre study area surrounds two additional privately initiated specific plan proposals which the City is processing independent ofthe CR Specific Plan the SSOacn Disneyland Rcson Specific Plan and the 6 5acre Hotel Cirtle Specific Plan A separate EIR is being prepared for each Specific Plan proposal Although the three specific plans C R Area Disneyland Rcson and Hotel Circle are being proposed separately all relate to the common planning framework of the Anaheim General Plan and each will be considered in light of the other proposals The EIRs being prepared for each Specific Plan will focus on the potential effects ofeach proposal however the environmental evaluation for each will address the potential cumulative impacts of the three proposals within the total estimated l04acre area designated for Commercial Recreation in the General Plan This Initial Study presents information specific to the CR Area Specific Plan referred to heretofore as the Project including the proposed Project description the actions required for Project approval and an evaluation of the probable environmental effects anticipated upon implementation of the Project eg future dc wlopment proposals guided by the Specific Plan The Notice of Preparation NOP and the Initial Study Checklist is being distnl uted to all responsible agencies truStee agencies and interested parties as required by the Califomia Environmental Quality Act CEQA EXISTING CONDmONS The Project area is primarily dc w loped with uses Current land uses include the Anaheim Coavention Center bolels aocl motels recreational vehicle parla industrial commerciallretail plant nursery parkina open space governmental mobile holllC parla office quasi public uses residential as well as vacant lanePrimary accc ss to the project area is from the I S Santa Ana Freeway via interchanges at KateUa Avenue Harbor Boulevard Ban Road and West StrceL 2 01885 e ---PAGE BREAK--- DESOrPTION OF THE PROTECT e Protect Location The Project is located in the CoR Area of the Oty of Anaheim The area occupies apprm imately 4835 acres It is located generally west of the 1 5 Freeway Santa Ana Freeway south of Vermont Street east of Walnut Street and north of Orangewood Avenue Exhibit t Regional Location and Exhibit 2 Vicinity Map depict the Project setting PROTECT CHARACTERISTICS The C R Area Specific Plan is expected to identify subareas or districts and will establish land uses and development standardsdesign guidelines for each district as well as densities related to hotel motel deve10pment with accessory uses and support retail developmCIIL Ancillary uses will include but are not limited to visitor serving uses and restaurant uses The levels of densities to be evaluated in the ana1ysis include Low SO rooms per acre Med UIII 75 rooms per acre and High tOO rooms per acre Project characteristics of these proposed types of uses and dCIISities are depicted in Exhibit 3 Proposed Specific Plan The Project will include a Public Facilities Plan to indicate the public faci1ities n ary to accommodate the level of proposed developmenL 14 DISCRETIONARY cnON Diseretionary actions to be requested as part of this Project are as follows Sued Plall It is envisioned that the C R Area Specific Plan will include a P1Iblie Facilities Plan and will designate the zelling for land use districts or subareas Each district will be designated for certain types of uses and associated densities related to hotel motel and support retail developmenL The Project will necessitate the adoption ofzelling and deve10pment standards as identified in the Commercial Recreation CR Area Specific Plan Other D1SC ltlona Actions of the Specific Plan may include the following discretionary actions fi riag mechanismsagreements amendment of the Oty ofAn h Genera1 Plan to ensure consistency bctweell the Specific Plan and the related elements of the General Plan and other actiollS related to the proposed of the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Specific Plan Project e J08J1ll1S5OlllOJS 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- PURPOSE OF THE ETR The EIR is being prepared by the City of Anaheim to assess the potential ellViroDDlental impacts that may arise in colIDection with future implementation of the CR Area Specific Plan In light ofthe range of actiollS and approvals that would be associated with future implementation ofthe CRArea Specific PIaD the EIR may be considered a ProIlUD EIR as that term is defined in Section 15168 of the CECA Guidelines A ProIlUD EIR is an EIR which may be prepared on aserie of actiollS that can be cbaracterized as one large project and are related because they are each a part of achain of contemplated actiOIlS tectAltematfvs In addition to evaluating the potential elIViroDDlental effects of the proposed CoR Area Specific PIaD the EIR will addresl a full range of project a1tematiw s including a No Project alternative required by CECA Relevant PIDnnh Bms Platming programs which arerelevant to the Project area but are not proposed as part of the CoR Area Specific Plan include the fonowing D1mnland Rl SOrt SDedftr Pia The Disney Development Company is cunently preparing a Specific Plan and EIR for apprmimately 5SO acres of land surroUllded by the CR Specific Plan Project Area lbis Project will consist of development of the site with a theme park hotels up to S 600 rooms retail parking and related uses and afuture ion area H I SDedftr Plan A Specific Plan is cunently being prepared for apprmimately 6 S acres of land located on the north side of Katena AYlnue between Haster Street and aemc ntine Street The Specific Plan area shares COIIIIIIOtI boundaries with the proposed CR Specific Plan Project Area The Hotel Cirde Specific Plan includes the development of SCYeIl hotels with a combined total number of rooms ranging from 1 5 13 to 1 733 Peo l M City of An hrim is investigating the feasibility of a people mover to link and employment centers with satellite parking in either or both the Recreation Area andor the Anaheim Stadium Business Center JOB 4 01887 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Katel1a A nue Suner l t The Orange County Transportation Authority is preparing an EIR for the KateUa Avenue Super Street Concpt Project The Em will cramine the potential impacts of widening KateUa Avenue throughout the C R Specific Plan area e In addition the City of Anaheim is currently preparing environmental assessments separate from the Katella Avenue Super Street Project at the following critical intersections Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and Haster Street KateUa Avenue and State College Boulevard The I S W1deninl F IR EIS Caltrans and FHWA have crtified the EIR1EIS for the 1 5 Freeway widening CI or Anaheim Utili tJnden Prol nm The City has adopted a program to underground overhead utility facilities on Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and West Street in the C R Area Convention Center Betterment IVl n1ect The City is currently preparing a Supplemental EIR for satellite parking associated with the expansion program for the City of Anaheim Convention Center West Street Reall ment Stnd9 The City is currently studying the realignment of West Street north and south of Ball Road to combine the two signalized interseetions and improve a for planned freeway interchange a ramps when the 1 5 Freeway is widened I Centr ll CI S The City has a study underway of the Central City sewer system including the Commercial Recreation Area to determine sewer deficiencies and provide remedial solutions based upon the General Plan land uses and densities Other Tl Other relevant studies include the Las Vegas Superspec d Train Central Orange County FlEd Guideway Orange County Commuter Rail Study 91 Freeway Widening 57 Freeway HOV Lanes 57 Freeway Extension to the 405 Freeway and Transit Way Interchange at Ccrritos and the 57 Freeway In addition to these studies the Orange County Transportation Authority is studying the feasibility of providing commuter rail service by utilizing existing Amtrak rail lines Funher the City is conducting a Regional Transportation Study to determine a more accessible location for the existing Amtrak station The relationship of each of these planning programs to the C R Area Specific Plan will be discussed in the EIR e J08 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- IEAD AGENCY The City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency responsible for preparing the Environmental Impact Report ErR Project and environmental proc cssing will be administered through the City of Anaheim P1anDiDg Department with the contact penon being as follOM Ms Lucy Yeager Senior PlanDer City of Anaheim P1anDiDg Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim California 9280S 714 2 4S139 ezt S440 PROBABLE ENVIRONMENTAL F ECTS An initial analysis has been undertaken to identify the probable environmental elIects associated with future implementation of the CoR Area Specific Plan Based on the FmdiDgs contained in the attached Environmental Information Check1ist an EIR is required for the Project Accordingly those impactS that may be considered be significant or potentially significant are identified in the attached Environmentall b I and are cnbed in AttachmentA the Dumbers and letters of each heading c lmi to thCIC on the attached check1ist JOB lS 6 01889 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e COUNTY I I J I I II H I I r YEIADO RIVERSIDE i COUNTY I I I I 1 I I SAlt DIEGO COUNTY LEGEND CIIY PIOJECT LCanlJl 1 e REGIONAL lOCATION MAP Anaheim C R Are Spedfic Plan EI EX N lilT ---PAGE BREAK--- e Lincoln Avenue a 0IS J BaD Rood eI I lateRa Avenue L r i I I eI j t s E I LEGEND I cu 0 s C l I e V I I N I T Y M A P Anaheim R Are 01891 11111 ---PAGE BREAK--- e It LEGEND I CU Spd CI JI alol MoloIo ity kBDy Ills lOW 50a b CM J MaIIlo ity kBDy Ills MEnIIl 7Sr tb CH I HalII MaIIlo ity kBDy Ills lllit 100r tb I I 0IIIIy HalII IIalIl c 1IaI r PROJECT AREA PLAN t S o c 1 Xl fEr Anaheim R Arec Speafie Plan EIR HIIIT ---PAGE BREAK--- INITIAL STUDY OF ENViRONMENTAL IMPACT CITY OF ANAHEIM Project tion riTy nf An h i COMmercial Recreation Area C Rl npcifir olan Project Loc tion The Soecifir o an aree is nerellv est of the 1 5 Santa Ana Freeway south of Vermont St east of Halnut Street and north of Oranoe ood Avenue Project Description The crcoosed croiect includes adoction of the C R Area Scecific Plar including the establis ent of objectives policies permitted land uses and densities d2v@1 t nd rdc rt cion ou d@ Pub1ie F eilities Plan for t le C P T l The C R Area Specific Plan does not rc ose any specific developcent projects for e ar but r t pr it ntondpn n nr v d Qu d reG d eonsi5t ncv for the future orooosals ithin the C R Specific Plan Area H1IlC of Owner Project Applic nt Citv of Anaheim Phone [PHONE REDACTED] Address P O Box 3222 Anaheim California 92805 Zip cOClel I f ppl icble Agent s Hllme Contact Lucy Yeager Senior Planner Phone [PHONE REDACTED] Address 200 S Anahei Blvd P O Box 3222 Anaheim California 92805 zip coeel Under the provisions of the t llforni Environaental QYAllty Aet tEQA 1 An Initial Study will be conducted to determine whether or not the project des cribed above could have a significant Individual or cumulative adverse imo ct on the envi o nt The Initi l Study shall consist of and ineorporate the Findings of F ct on the folloing p ges 2 If the l iti 1 Study conch d th t the ill b no significant yiro lIfte t 1 i ct theft Ne9 Jtive Dect 1ratiOft witt be prep recf b City Staf I the Negetive Decleration Is ap roved by the Lead Ageftcy it will ftOt be necessery to SlIblftil an Eftvi o nul IlllIlact Reoort EIR for thiS project J If the Initi l Stwd that there could ttc Si9 ific f J dividual or c luive dverse envir Mal i act or if Ueguive Declaration Is not approved by the Lead Agency then It will be necessary for you to SlIbmit a Craft EIR in accordanCI with the tlty of Anahei EIR Culdelines I equest t t an InitIal Study be conducted aftd egree to provide all applicable infor tion pertainin9 10 the questions In the of Fect I decl e uftde pCftalty 0 inforNtio to the It it 0 Dcrjury tht the tc fttS JS contained her in re correCt Due JA 9 Ifril Sigftetllre of APo iC Rev 817 01893 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e 9 4 10 11 12 I I 15 16 e INITIAl STUOY FIN01N S OF FACT I Could project cnange proposed uses of land as Indicated on tne Ceneral Plan either On project site or within general re 7 2 Jould significant inerc es in eIther noise levels dust Odors fumes vibr tlon Or r diatlon be generated from proJe t are either during construction or from eomolcted project other thl those resulting from norm 1 eonstruetlon actIvIty Wi 11 roje t Involve llpl1c atlon use or dtspos l of hazardouS or toxi materlals7 il1 any deviation rom any estab ished environment l standards air water noise I Ignt etc and or adOPted plans be requested in eonneetion with project7 5 il1 project rtQuire t1on luthorlz tlon or Issuance of I oermit by Y local stlte or fcoeral gency7 Health Department tomie ncr9Y Com issiO 1 Ir Pollution Control District etc 6 Jill tne projee require he I ac of rrcunts of energy wni h ould be reduced by t e use of ppropriate itigAtlon meAsures7 7 B Could the proje t rc te I traffIc h zard or congestion Could project result in any substantial change in Quality Quantity or ac of any portion of regions Ir o su face and ground ter resources Vi I 1 project involve construction of facilities ift an area which could be flooded during an Intermediate regional flood7 1111 project result In need for public facilities or services beyond thosc presently available or proposed In near future Could tne project result in the cement of communIty resldentl7 re tnere any known hlslorical or archeological sites In viclhity of project area which could be affected by project Are any n tur l or n de eAtures in project rel unique or rare I e not normally found In otner p rts of county or reglonl 7 Could the proje t fect the use of recre tionl1 are or ar of impor nt aesthetic value or reduce or restrict access to public landS or p 1rks Are tnere ny prominent Or lPecimen trees as defined In See 18 8 038 ree Preserv tion of tfte untcip 1 COde or Any rare or endangered plant species in project arc Does project rea serve as nablt t food source nesting place lource of water mlgruory patn etc for ny rHe or endangered lid life or f n specles1 1 Yes ybe No L 01894 L L v x x x x x x L L x x x ---PAGE BREAK--- 17 j 11 project be Ie ed in irM ledlate rei of ny ad Se geologic feature such as sl e prone Ire s erosible s ds e rtn faults etc lB Could project substantially affect POtentll1 use or of a non renewable nltural resource 19 ill Iny grlding or excavation be required in connection with project which could liter any existing prominent surface llnd form ie hillsides clnyons dr tnlgecOl etc 20 ill any effects of the subject project together or In conJunction with effects of other projects eause I signlfi lnt adverse impact on the environment Ye Ilybe No v e L z SUKKARY OF F I NO I NCS AND CUIIULATlVE EFFECTS ATTACH ADD IT I DNAL SHEETS I F NECESSARY 1 If Iny of the Findings of Fact hive been answered Yes or IIAYBE then a brief clarifieltic of potential shall be Included u well IS discussion of any cumulative effects Please see Attach ent A KITICATION KEASURES ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY Describe type Ind anticipated efrect of Iny mc sureS proposed to iti lte or eli inate potentially significant dverse environmental Impacts e STAFF EVA U TIl1 17 DDITIONAL ItEETS IF tlECESSA Y Th Ini ti 1 Study indie e that D Project is CategorIcally Exempt Clus un er State LI C Project is already covered under EIR No D A Negat ive De larlt ion should be prepared An E lVlronmental Impact eport should be prepared I rJ t1 l7ityrizetf sign I r I ooing D partment JR f D te J 7 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e In l h S a e SS lftb1y 0111 Ilo HH h County 0 Oran9 r qula that the Clty notl the County 0 certain onln9 action To detersln the ne d or no ltlc tlon p1 s compl t the ollo lnq ch ckll t o ll Do thl lonln9 action InyolY adoption or nd nt to Ith r 1 the nah i C n r l lan bl Sp l n or cl a A Tn X 110 IF ill COK ItT TilE rOIIOIHlIC 1 Co thl lonln9 ctlon 1nyolvo l rid locatcd ca t 0 the a1lqnAent of w lr Canyon Aoad Tn 110 X JI Coe thl lonlnq action Inyolv a r sld ntlal proj ct oy r acr s or IInl t In d e 4 CO or a Yes thl lonln9 action 1nyolye a non r I ntlal pro cet Tel X 110 X non r ld ntial proj ct IIOre than upIOll1 No oyer acr IS vi I 9 ff Cat pla nL sta7f Oiiiy t pt ro atHlc tl y C ouI1ty CtlCic tlon r t1ulrcd rI A IPlannet 0 lqn 1tur 0 A 9 Iff Cat e ---PAGE BREAK--- ATIACHMENT A INlTlAL STUDY CHECKUST FINDINGS OF FAcr The purpose of the proposed Commercial Recreation Area Specific Plan is to establish objectives policies land uses and densities and development guidelines for the systematic implementation of the General Plan for the Commercial Recreation Area Existing zoning within the CoR Area currently permits privately initiated development of the Commercial Recreation Area However it is the intent of the City through the Specific Plan planning process to be proactive and develop a visionary comprehensive all inclusive plan that addresses the potential cumulative efectS offuture development within the CoR Area An eva1uation of the broad r3D e of potential cumulative efectS generated by development in the CoR Area could not be as extensively addressed or accounted for on an individual project by project basis The CoR Area Specific Plan does not propose any specific development projects for the area but rather is intended to provide guidance and consistency for future proposals within the CoR Specific Plan Area Adoption of the CR Area Specific Plan would not directly result in development impacts however future implementation of the Specific Plan Co individual development Pl Oposas being guided by the Specific Plan could result in development impacts This ErR will not discusl potential CDVironmental impacts of individual projectS that may be proposed at a future date Individual development projects proposed within the CoR Area will be subject to further environmental documentation and review 1 Gene 1 Pill Consistenr f M be The Project is consistent with the City s General Plan Commercial Recreation land uses for the area and will implement and elaborate the Genc raJ Plan Amendments to elements of the General Plan may be recommended during the CO USC ofSpecific Plan eva1uation and refinement in order to maintain consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan 2 Noi e nd Aip 0111 t nels rM l Future development of land uses allowed by the Specific Plan could create short term project specific air quality and noise impacts resultinc from construction activities in essence a potential future or secondary impact of the proposed Project Short term odor impacts from diesel JOBJOQ5j lDIDJS A I 01897 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e colIStruction equipment could also occur during COlIStructiOn The EIR will discuss typical colIStruction related impacts which could be generated by the development ofSpecific Plan land uses allowed in the Project area An air resources specialist will conduct an air quality ana yis estimating areawide smog pr r emissions The analysis will involve modeling carbon monoxide levels using CALINE 4 at huildout conditions The relatiollShip of the proposed Project s colISistency with the Air Quality Management Plan will be discussed Potential project specific andlor cumulative air quality impacts will be identified Based on the Air Quality Management Plan objectives and the mitigation measures proposed in the Project the EIR will define the level of significance for the Project as well as the cumulative impacts Estimates ofpollutants emitted by the proposed Project will be identified using the URBEMIS II model This model will calculate total air pollutant emissiollS based on proposed Project land uses for the following pollutants total organic gases carbon monoxide and nitrosen oxides The noise ana yis will be conducted by an acoustical engineer and will identify all sensitive noise receptors in the Project area On and off site noise monitoring will be conducted to establish the existing and future noise levels along nearby streets and highways and will reference the FHWA Highway Traflic Noise Prediction Model The emting and future lr2fiic noise contours will be determined in terms of the Noise Equivalent Leve1 CNEL noise scale 3 nl iDnsal or Ra 3rdOIl5rroYi Materials M vbe The EIR will assess the past uses of the Project study area for potential use storage or disposal of toxic and hazardous wastes or materials Available public records and applicable Federal State and locallislS will also be researched for documentation of known past or current sitesareas of contamination within the Project study area Should notable hazardous materia1s waste problelllS be found to exist in the study area future implementation of the CoR Area Specific Plan and development with affected areas could present a potential need for remediation andlor disposal 4 Dni tinn rmm Est lbli hed Envimnmentar Standards Mavbe Future development which is allowed and guided by the Specific Plan is not anticipated to exceed any local or regional environmental standards and no deviation from established standards or e JOBfOllSOOtQ lS A 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- adopted plaes is anticipated Potential water noise and air quality impacts will hlJWeYer be evaluated to eesure compliance with applicable local and regional Stalldards s Permit Requirements rMavbel The approval of a Specific Plac including a Public Facilities Plan and zocicg and development Stalldards will be coesidered by the Oty Future implementation may require the following discretionary actions FltIlIDcing and other actiotIS related to the proposed implementation of the C R Area Specific Plan Project Permittin of specific uses allowed by the Specific Plan Approvalspermits from other agencies cg SCAQMD permit for boilers and Health Department Permits for restaurants etc Future approval of general plan amendments may be maintain cotlSistency the General Plan and the proposed Specific Plan Further as individual developme1t pro CClS within the Specific Plan Study Area are approved building permits will be required prior to COtlSuuctiOIl 6 Eneft1 9Conmll1Dtfon MaYbe The future development of uses aI10wed by the Specific Plan may result in the consumption of significant quantities of enerl resources Natural gas and cotlSumption estimates will be calculated for potential buildout ofthe area and together with fuel consumption estimates will determine total enerl consumption requirements for such developmenL 7 Tl 2m ImDads Maybe Development of the Rcc rcation Area under the existing zocicg code may result in traffic impacts The intent ofthe proposed Specific Plan for the C R Area is to comprehetlSively plan for future potential cumulative effects of development within the C R Area thereby attempting to incorporate mechanisms to reduce future traffic and circulation impacts that would likely result under the existin zocic An analysis of the existin tratlSportation conditiollS year 2000 and year 2010 forecasts will be completed to determine if uses allowed under the Specific JOB lIll5SOOtGJS A 3 01899 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Plan would result in additional vehicular traffic A regionally compauble traffic model will be used to analyze the development which will incorporate long range suhregional development assumptions into traffic forecasts 8 Water DualitT Air Dualitv Mavbe Potential development of the area with structures roads and other impermeable surfaces could result in a decrease in soil absorption rates Also development ofthe area may result in changes to the amount quantity and quality of area runoff Urban runoff associated with the proposed implementation ofthe Specific Plan which could include pesticides fertilize and other petroleum based materials will also be addressed for their effects on water quality The potential impact ofdevelopment allowed in the study area will be discussed in terms of the pre and post discharge drainage patterns and the proposed storm drain infrastructUre system This discussion will descnbe how runoff from peak storm flows would be conveyed into regional stonn drain systems 4 Development of uses allowed by the Specific Plan may contnbute to the deterioration of local air quality due to future construction emissions project generated traffic and stationary emissions see Item 2 9 Flnodinp Mavbe The area is located in Flood Zone X formerly Flood Zone B Source The Federal Emergency Management Agency s Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Number 06213 Panel 20 September IS 1989 and discussion with City ofAnaheim staff Potential impacts from increased runoff will be evaluated 10 Publlr S rvI and Facilities Mavbe Specific Plan implementation could result in an incremental increase in the demand for public services and utilities including water sewer storm drain natural gas electricity fire police solid waste schools paries recreation telephone cable TV and any others as appropriate The ability of the service providers to service the study area will be evaluated in the EIR e JOB llllUOO OJS A4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 11 Di nlsC @ment n Community Residents avbe Existing Project area zoning prohibits in large part residential uses of property Some existing long term residential uses currently exist in the study area No specific development projects are proposed as pan of the CoR Area Specific Plan and no displacement of businesses or residences would result from adoption of the Specific Plan To the crtent that future implementation ofthe Specific Plan serves to revitalize the study area and engendel the replacement of uses with c ommerc ial recreational uses some existing long term residents may be displac ed e 1 2 HI dori l and A hBt OltwiOlJ R iou No The study area is largely urbanized and future development as allowed by the Specific Plan would oc cur in previously developed areas No arc haeologic al resources are knOWll to exist in the area or arec xpec ted to be enc ountered during future development No historic allandmarla have been identified within the study area 13 Unioue Natul 21 or Man Made No The study area includes the Anaheim Convention Center industrial uses hotelsmotels c ommerc ia lretail uses recreational vehicle parla plant nursery parking facilities governmental facilities mobile home parla oflice uses quasi public uses residential as weD as vacant land No unique or rare natural or man made features will be impacted by the proposed Specific Plan 14 R tlon Aesthetic Value IMavbe Implementation of the proposed Project may result in indirec t impacts to existing parle and recreation facilities and programs Anticipated areas of impact include landscape maintenance in medians and parkways street tree increased use of para for picnics and human services egchild care recreation programs and use ofrecreation facilities such as gymnasiums and lighted athletic fields The Project is not anticipated to impact ally areas of important aesthetic value A positive aesthetic impact on land uses both puhlic and private is one of the ohjectives of the proposed Project A S e ---PAGE BREAK--- 15 Tl ft Plant SDedes INol e The study area is either altered or developed and does not contain any prominent or specimen trees or rareendangered plant species 16 SDedes INol The study area includes the Anaheim ColMntion Center industrial uses hotelsmotels commercialretail uses recreational vehicle parks plant nursery parking facilities governmental facilities mobile home parla office uses quasi puhlic uses residential as well as vacant land and does not accommodate any significant biological re sounes 17 Geotechnie al Constraint rMnbel The ErR will address earth resoun es Further will be required to document ezisting area characteristics as individual development proposals allowed under the Specific Plan are pror t 1L Nonl e1lewnble Natural ResotJ MaYbe The study area contains no known natural resources The ErR will address energy collSumption and conservation eg collSumption of natural fuels for energy generation as well as water collSumption and conservation associated with poteltial future uses allowed by the Specific Plan 19 Landform lNo The study area does not contain any hi1Isides canyons or drainage courses Project implementation will not impact any existing prominent landform features 0 Cumulative lmD ns Mavbe Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan together with other development projects in the vicinity may result in environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively significanL These effects wm be addressed in the ErR e JOB llll1l00IOJS A ---PAGE BREAK--- ate Clearinghouse ffice of Planning Research 400 Tenth St icramento CA 95814 lr Resources Board ationary Source Division Sue Wyman 0 Box 2B15 lcramento CA 95812 So Coast Air Quality Hqmt Lst Planning Division 50 E Flair Dr l Honte CA 91731 tn Barry Walleratein Oir ounty of Riverside lanning Department J80 Lemon St 9th FIr iverside CA 92376 ounty of San Diego annin9 Department Ol Ruffin Road Ste B an Diego CA 92123 1666 Lty of Garden Grove Jebra Hart Adv PIng Supvr 391 Acacia parkway lrden Grove CA 92640 lncho Santiago Comm Colleg 030 W 17th St Santa Ana CA 92706 tn Dr Robert Jan on vernment Publishing Dept 1 Main Library 0 Box 19557 Irvine CA 92713 verside Transit Agency 25 3rd St iverside CA 92507 i v1t l n r M n J r r OEIR MAILING LIST AP1488LY State of California Dept of Transportation Oistrict 12 250l Pullman st Santa Ana CA 92705 Attn Bob Joseph Department of Health Services 215l Berkeley Way Berkeley CA 94704 Calif Regional Water Quality control Board 6809 Indiana Ave Suite 200 Riverside CA 92506 County of San Sernardino Planning Department 3B5 N Arrowhead Ave San Bernardino CA 92415 City of Orange Jack HcGee Dir Comm P O Box 449 Orange CA 92666 Dev City of Buena park Planning Director 6650 Beach Blvd Buena park CA 90620 City of Villa Park Planning Dep nt 17855 Santiago Blvd Villa Park CA 92667 City of Tuatin Community Development Dept 300 Centennial Way Tuatin CA 926BO Foothill Eastern Transp Corridor Agency 345 Clinton St COsta Hesa CA 92626 60ll State of California Division of Kines and l416 Ninth St sacramento CA 95B14 Geelee So Calif Assn of Governments Attn Clearinghouse Coord B18 W Seventh St 12th Flr Los Angeles CA 90017 3435 Kari Rigoni County of Orange Environmental Hgmt Agency P O Box 4048 Santa Ana CA 92702 4048 County of Los Angeles Planning Department 320 w Temple St Los Angeles CA 90012 City of Yorba Linda Phillip S Paxton Plng 4845 Hain St Yorba Linda CA 92686 Dir e city of Stanton Planning Director 10660 Western Ave Stanton CA 90680 City of Placentia Planning Director 401 E Chapman Ave Placentia CA 92670 City of Pullenon Paul Dudley Director Dev service Dept 303 W Commonwealth Ave Pullenon CA 92632 emitrans 1700 W 5th St San Bernardino CA 92411 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e A County Transportation commission 6 W 7th St 00 Angeles CA 90017 Anaheim Bulletin 0 Andrew Silva O Box 70004 aheim CA 92825 0004 O ange Unified School Dist 370 N Glassell St o ange CA 92666 A n Frank Remkiewiez So California Gae Co 0 an98 County Division O 80x 3334 r aheim CA 92803 acific Sell 2939 E Coronado St 2nd Flr aheim CA 92807 ichael 0 Brunner President Kaleidoscope Condo Assoc 391 S Walnut 1703 k aheim CA 92802 k aheim Chamber of Commerce 100 S Anaheim Blvd k aheim CA 92805 County S4nitation Distriets of Orange County O 80x 8127 ountain Valley CA 92728 8127 O anqe co Waste and Hazardous a erials Advisory Committee 2 chard Ackerman ty of Fullerton 3 3 W Commonwealth Avenue lerton CA 92632 e COMU RCIAL RECREATION AREA SPECIFIC P OUR MAILING LIST 1 AP1488LY Orange County Register Ricky Young 1771 S Lewis St Anaheim CA 92805 Anaheim Elem School District Meliton Lope Ph D 890 S Olive Anaheim CA 92805 5299 Garden Grove Unified School District 10331 Stanford Ave Garden Grove CA 92640 Multi Vision Cable Co Bill Snyder Operations Mgr 3041 E Miraloma Ave Anaheim CA 92806 CUrtis Stricker H O M E 1117 Wakefield Pl Anaheim CA 92802 Jerry Horri on Pepperwood Village Homeowners Assoc 2112 E 4th St Suite 200 Santa Ana CA 92705 Municipal Water District of Orange COunty P O Box 15229 Santa Ana CA 92705 Transportation Corridor Agency 345 Clinton St Costa Mesa CA 92626 Page 2 L A Times O C Edition Kevin Johnson LisA Mascaro 1375 Sunflower Ave Costa Mesa CA 92626 Anaheim High School District Attn Rita S Newman 501 Crescent Way PO Box 3520 Anaheim CA 92803 3520 Magnolia Elem School Diot 2705 W Orange Ave Anaheim CA 92804 So California Edison Co Wayne Milner Superintendent 1241 S Grand Ave Santa Ana CA 92705 Lila Jagger President S Anaheim Neighborhood Council 105 E Leatrice Ln 2 Anaheim CA 92802 Sgt Jim Weddell Calif Highway patrol Planning Analysis Division 2555 First Ave sacramento CA 95814 Mich l Betts Mgr Planning orange County Transportation Authority P O Box 3005 Garden Grove CA 92640 Orange Co Water Diet P O Box 8300 Fountain Valley CA 92728 8300 ---PAGE BREAK--- Economic Planning ttn Joanne Brion S15 B Fourth St Serkeley CA 94710 Systems oan Kelly Michael Brandman Associates 06 S Olive St Suite 600 os Angeles CA 90014 he SWA Group 5S0 Broadway Suite 200 caguna Beach CA 92651 CO RCIAL RECREATION AREA SPECIFIC aT OJECT TEAM MAILING T AP14SSL 7 Curtis Alling Michael Brandman Associates 2530 Red aill Ave Santa Ana CA 92705 Tony Skidmore Michael Brandman Associates 2530 Red aill Ave Santa Ana CA 92705 Joanne LOmbardo p 0 Technologiee 1100 Town Country Orange CA 92668 Page 3 e Rd 1300 Tom Winfield Brown Winfield Canzoneri 300 S Grand Ave Suite 1500 II Los Angeles CA 90071 3125 e II II e ---PAGE BREAK--- 4111tou9 Moreland isney Development Co 500 S Buena Vista St 3urbank CA 91521 e CO RCIAL RECREATION AREA SPECIFIC P AN INTERESTED PARTIES MAILING LI AP1488L7 Frank k Elfend President Frank Elfend Associates 4675 MacArthur Ct Suite 660 Newport Beach CA 92660 Page Foothill Project Management Attn Sandra J Gunn 117 1 2 2Bth St Newport Beach CA 92660 ---PAGE BREAK--- crn OF ASAHEIM CALIFORitA Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING The Ci1y of Anaheim will be conducting a public scoping meeting in connection with the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report EIR for the City s Commercial Recreation C R Area Specific Plan The proposed project encompasses approximately 485 acres in the area of the City of Anaheim known as the Commercial Recreation Area which is located generally west of the 1 5 Freeway Santa ArIa Freeway between Orangewood Avenue and Vermont Avenue I and east of Walnut Street The proposed project will identify subareas or districts and will establish land uses and development standards design guidelines and identify public facilities services necessary for ultimate development It is also anticipated to include a range of land use densities associated with hotel motel development and accessory uses for districts in the project area Current land uses within the project area include the Anaheim Convention Center hotels and motels recreational vehicle parks industrial retail plant nursery parking open space governmental mobile home parks office quasi public uses residential as well as vacant land Based on an initial scudy of the proposed project the City has determined that it is necessary to evaluate potential environmental impacts that may result from the project Therefore an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA The CoR Area Specific Plan would not directly result in development impacts however future implementation of the Specific Plan could indirectly result in developlll8nt impacts These future individual development proposals will be subject to further environmental documentation and review Early public consultation is an optional process which is often used in preparing an ErR This process known as scoping has been found to be helpful in ideneifying the range of actions alternatives mitigation measures and potentially significane effects to be analyzed in an EIR Ie should be noeed that the purpose of this meeting is co receive public inpu for dhe environmental process not to consider the merits of the proposal The decision making process will following the completion of the EIR You will be notified of the public hearing at that eime All INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO A1 I END A PUBUC SCOPING HEElING TO ASSIST IN ID I FYING ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED IN IilE DRAFl EIR Al TENDEES JILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITi TO PROVIDE INP11l TO IilE CONSUL IANl S PREPARING IilE EIR The public scoping meeting will be held on IJednesdaY October 2 1991 COIIIlI8nting at 6 30 p m CITiOF ANAHEIM COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 SOlJ nANAHEIM BOOU VARD ANAHEIM For more information please contact Lucy Yeager City of Anaheim Planning Departmene 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim California 92805 [PHONE REDACTED] Ext 5440 AP1569LY 200 South Anaheim Boulevard P O Box 3222 Anaheim California 92803 714 5139 01907 e ---PAGE BREAK--- State Clearinghouse Office of Planning Research 1400 Tenth St Sacramento CA 95814 Air Resources Soard Stationary Source Division Sue Wyman P O Box 2815 Sacramento CA 95812 So Coast Air Quality Mgmt Dist Planning Oivision 9150 E Flair Dr El Monte CA 91731 Attn Barry Waller tein Dir County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon St 9th Flr Riverside CA 92376 ounty of San Diego lannin9 Department 201 Ruffin Road Ste B San Diego CA 92123 1666 City of Garden Grove Debra Hart Adv PIng Supvr 11391 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove CA 92640 Rancho Santiago Comm College 1530 W 17th St Santa Ana CA 92706 Attn Dr Robert Jen80n Government Publishing Dept UCI Main Library P O Box 19557 I vine CA 92713 Riverside Transit Agency 1825 3rd St R ver9ide CA 92507 e CCMERCIAL RECREATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN OEIR HAILING LIST AP1488LY State of California Dept of Transportation District 12 2501 Pullman St Santa Ana CA 92705 Attn Bob Joseph Department of Health Services 2151 Berkeley Way Berkeley CA 94704 Calif Regional Water Quality Control Board 6809 Indiana Ave Suite 200 Riverside CA 92506 County of San Bernardino Planninq Department 385 N Arrowhead Ave San Bernardino CA 92415 City of Orange Jack MCGee Dire Comm Dev P O Box 449 Orange CA 92666 City of Buena Park Planning Director 6650 Beach Blvd Buena Park CA 90620 City of Villa Park Department 17B55 Santiago Blvd Villa Park CA 92667 City of Tustin Community Development Dept 300 Centennial Way Tustin CA 92680 Foothill Eastern Transp Corridor Aqency 345 Clinton St Costa Mesa CA 92626 6011 Page 1 State of California Division of Kines and Geolo l 1416 Ninth St Sacramento CA 95814 So Calif Assn of Governments Attn Clearinghouse Coord B18 W Seventh St 12th Flr Los Anqele8 CA 90017 3435 Xari Riqoni County of Orange Environmental Mgmt Agency P O Box 4048 Santa Ana CA 92702 404B County of Los Angeles Planning Department 320 W Temple St Los Anqele8 CA 90012 City of Yorba Linda Phillip S Paxton Plng Dir 4845 Main St Yorba Linda CA 926B6 City of Stanton Planninq Director 10660 Western Ave Stanton CA 90680 City of Placentia Planning Director 401 E Chapman Ave Placentia CA 92670 City of Fullerton Paul Dudley DirectOr Dev Service Dept 303 W Commonwealth Ave Fullerton CA 92632 Omitran8 1700 W 5th St San Bernardino CA 92411 ---PAGE BREAK--- cr MERC AL RECREATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN DEIR MAILING LIST AP1488LY L A County Transportation ommission 18 W 7th St QS Angeles CA 90017 1aheim Bulletin c o Andrew Silva O 80x 70004 aheim CA 92825 0004 range Unified School Dist 70 N Glassell St Orange CA 92666 tn Frank Remkiewlez o California Gaa ce range County Division c O Box 3334 Anaheim CA 92803 Pacific 8ell 939 E Coronado St 2nd FIr naheim CA 92807 ichael O Brunner Pre ident Kaleidoscope Condo A oc 391 S Walnut 1703 naheim CA 92802 naheim Chamber of Commerce 00 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 ounty Sanitation District of Orange county P O Box B127 untain Valley CA 9272B 8127 Orange Co Waste and Hazardous lterials Advisory Committ chard Ackerman City of Fullerton 3 W Commonwealth Avenue Jllerton CA 92632 orange County Register Ricky Young 1771 S Lewis St Anaheim CA 92805 Anaheim Elem School District Meliton Lopez Ph D 890 S Olive Anaheim CA 92805 5299 Garden Grove Unified School Distriet 10331 Stanford Ave Garden Grove CA 92640 Multi Vision Cable Co Bill Snyder Operations Mgr 3041 E Miraloma Ave Anaheim CA 92806 CUrtis Stricker H O M I 1117 Wakefield Pl Anaheim CA 92802 Jerry Morrison Pepperwood Village Homeowners Assoc 2112 E 4th St Suite 200 Santa Ana CA 92705 Municipal Water District of Orang County P o Box 15229 santa Ana CA 92705 Transportation COrridor Agency 345 CUnton St Costa Kesa CA 92626 Page 2 L A Times O C Edition Kevin JOhnson Lisa Mascar 1375 sunflower Ave Costa Mesa CA 92626 Anaheim High School District Attn Rita S Newman 501 Crescent Way PO Box 3520 Anaheim CA 92803 3520 Magnolia Elem School Dist 2705 W Orange Avs Anaheim CA 92804 So California Edison Co Wayne Kilner Superintendent 1241 S Grand Ave Santa Ana CA 92705 Lila Jagger President S Anaheim Neighborhood Council 105 E Leatrice Ln 12 Anaheim CA 92802 e Sgt Jim Weddell Calif Highway Patrol Planning Analysis Division 2555 First Ave Sacramento CA 95814 Michael aetts Hgr Planninq Orange County Transportation Authority P O Box 3005 Garden Grove CA 92640 Orange Co Water Dist P O BOx 8300 Fountain Valley CA 92728 8300 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Economic Planning Systems Attn Joanne Brion 1815 B Fourth St Berkeley CA 94710 Joan Kelly Michael Brandman Associates 606 S Olive St suite 600 Los Angeles CA 90014 The SWA Group 580 Broadway Suiee 200 Laguna Beach CA 92651 e CClM ERC1 t w CREAT10N AREA SPJ Cll JC pJ Al j PROJECT CONSULTANT TEAM MAILIN IST AP14B8L7 Curtis Alling Michael Brandman As ociate 2530 Red Hill Ave Santa Ana CA 92705 Tony Skidmore Michael Brandman Associates 2530 Red Hill Ave Santa Ana CA 92705 l age Joanne Lombardo P D Technologies 1100 Town Country Rd 300 Orange CA 92668 Tom Winfield Brown Winfield Canzoneri 300 S Grand Ave Suite 1500 Los Angeles CA 90071 3125 ---PAGE BREAK--- q Moreland 3ney Development Co CO S Buena Vista St urbank CA 91521 on R Hart Jolly Roger 318 W Lawrence Road hoenix Arizona 85013 C MERC AI RECREA ION AREA SPECIFLC INTERESTED PARTIES MAILING AP1488L7 Frank R E1fend President Frank Elfend Associates 4675 MacArthur Ct Suite 660 Newport Beach CA 92660 PLAN T Page 4 Foothill Project Managemente Attn Sandra J Gunn 117 1 2 28th St Newport Beach CA 92660 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Jm Hart 0 1y Roger 3 8 w Lawrence Road hoenix Arizona 85013 Joug Moreland isney Development Co 300 S Buena Vista St 3 rbank CA 91521 30b Roth iisney Anaheim 313 S Harbor Blvd Anaheim CA 92802 aul Pruett 201 S Euclid i naheim CA 92802 30b Buelow 834 Gail Ln naheim CA 92802 Arian Benedict 63 S Helena St aheim CA 92802 ario DalesB lly Roger Inn 5 0 W Katella Ave aheim CA 92802 Jr Wilkerson elodyland OO Freedman Wy aheim CA 92802 avid Bedyon A Group 80 Broadway a 1 r a Beach CA 92651 cc tRCIAL RECREATION SCOPING MEETl 10 2 91 ATTENDANCE HAIL LIST AP1583LY Bob Greer cushman Wakefield 2100 Main St Suite Irvine CA 92802 Jean Hockett Anaheim High school 501 N Crescent Way Anaheim CA 92804 Dist 100 Joan Schlund R Paul Grimm Traffic Eng City of Garden Grove 11391 Acacia Garden Grove CA 92640 Bob Messe 1523 Bayless Anaheim CA 92802 Vinee Kagawan Anaheim CA Glen Roosevelt Odetie Inc 1280 N Piedmont Dr Anaheim CA 92806 Mel Lee 2215 W Broadway IF209 Anaheim CA 92B02 R Catron J Catron 1732 Norfolk Anaheim CA 92802 Von Loveland SCAQMO 9150 Flair Dr El Monte CA 91733 Rita Bernie Maun 1774 Norfolk Ln Anaheim CA 92B02 Terri Vermeller Anaheim Bulletin 1771 S Lewis St Anaheim CA 92802 Steve White Anaheim Home Joan Kelly Michael Brandman A BOC 606 S Olive St Ste 600 Los Angeles CA 90014 George Barbu Melodyland 400 Freedman Wy Anaheim CA 92802 Elio Betty Ronconi 1241 S Walnut Anaheim CA 92802 Jeff Kiuch 2661 W palais Anaheim CA 92804 Rocki Schmidt 715 Amstutz Anaheim CA 92802 ---PAGE BREAK--- Allan Hughes Chamber of Commerce 100 S Anaheim Blvd 300 knaheim CA 92805 Mengesha A 1J23 Chalet Anaheim CA 92802 Harvey Taf 575 N Century Dr Anaheim CA 92802 Paul Ridenour 1403 Goodhue Ave Anaheim CA 92804 N H Pickett Caltrans 2501 Pullman St Anaheim CA 92806 Miriam Kaywood 2784 W Wi1berta Lane Anaheim CA 92804 Jane Fujishige 1801 Ave of the Stars 1202 Century City CA 90067 AP1583LY Robert Kuehn Attorney 200 N Harbor Blvd Anaheim CA 92802 Curtis Stricker 1117 Wakefield Place Anaheim CA 92802 John Carrisos 1326 Colonial Anaheim CA 92802 Ron Fox Roosevelt Co 10300 Town Center Or Anaheim CA 92802 Joel Sheila Lewis 1320 W Katella Anaheim CA 92802 Ned Snavely Anaheim Marriott 700 Convention Way Anaheim CA 92802 J Oscar Picazo V Chairman SANC 1607 S Michelle Dr 5 Anaheim CA 92802 Doug Renner Community Redevelopment 1226 W Western Dr Anaheim CA 92801 Jo Makepeace 1212 W Holgate Dr Anaheim CA 92802 Jackie Terrell 1307 N Jasmine Pl Anaheim CA 92801 Tom Juenge1 1515 S Manchester Ave Anaheim CA 92802 e WID Krebs Telephone Taxpayers Committee 996 Siet Ave Anaheim CA 92806 01913 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e f L I J I c L J 0 r NFQ C I I Cc ADDRESS L ooMA IN Z l sv o 1 rA IIl 4 COv v ir v e 2eJ E A0clre0w1 2ul s r r A r 6 Uf Rocevli1 r ktI v o eJ R I J C rJ IZ VC7r Lov J I j Q I f r r o M r r3 71 lJJ 4ft1 W tl c 1l I If u IrvN 2cr 1V 1 e V nN iJ eA jIl dnAJJd fOp 5 JiEtJ bCO Ar f I J fV Q L L V Q 54 V Ic 4cCw u d PflN dT q cUd Vv R f 0 R 11 L f i lr Fc c1 li 4 1 461 7 hi 0 1 S 2 lv PAlAJ 11 12 rfouu sz 1 I 7 7 l A s J t L 2867p Jj l6 H q IO t erJcs I c 1260 PtE JMONr 4 1 JlAvF 7 r Iv r r 74 v t AI l1e 1cj 6 I 3 C l Je K JJI S AG D 72Vor4 V r FlaIl f E M h G5 fJ Ie c 1 7rJ 44 t iJ o ---PAGE BREAK--- BUSI SS ADORESS 3Dt d 100 k 111 FJ T 2jJ t 11 11 9 lall p r 13t uOr 91 IL AAlA t 132 k a J irr e O cfJ Jdrn Cjr I ArJll7 lV1 rrs N C r JJ kLj I u t rAIc J Nd d v 1If itW 7dV GNJirlf1 J WA1 J tLJF V l u CODJJU E Ihce ft 4t fJ jC 607 L j J I J I L f 2 Iv fv l A 7 I PI II r It I i UtiA Z6 It V 1111 LrJ i i c 1tJ7fl 0 J J tl ujlJ j 9 A yy d r I L 1 A dtr f ISI J 1 P1 ciu t V 7Jr f tl T 1 J lfYtIc r IJ 7 c V L S 196 S r v II 4 N fl 9 z fct 2867p e ---PAGE BREAK--- e 4 I I PUBLIC SCOPING KEETrNG COMMENT CARD COMMERCIAL RECREATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Please list any environmental issues which you would like to see discussed in the EIR The specific plan proiect area map would indicate Odetics is not even a consideration for study In fact it looks like the Grand Hotel the Fuiishiqe strawberry field and Disney owned property are all in the same situation I am confused since Disney s plans call for hiah density hotels on their property why would they not be included in this study Is there another study for our area John Cresse 1515 So Manchester Ave Anaheim CA 92802 Telephone 774 5000 Name Address Comments may also be mailed to LUCy Yeaqer Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planninq Department P O Box 3222 Anaheim CA 92803 Please forward them to Lucy s attention by Friday October 11 1991 if possible ---PAGE BREAK--- ci76 f OCT 1fii1 l hAN I DEP G ARlMEN7 E 7 1 I l PUBLIC SCOPING KEETING COMMENT CARD COMMERCIAL RECREATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT e which you would like to see e Name Address MI L alIdIcI aa 5trWt Anaheim CA Telephone b G 0 Comments may also be mailed to Lucy Yeaqer Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planninq Department P O Box 3222 Anaheim CA 92803 Please forward them to Lucy S attention by Friday October 11 1991 if possible ---PAGE BREAK--- 57ATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON @ DATE Sep 17 1991 TO Reviewing Aqency RE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING DEPARTMENT s NOP for CITY OF ANAHEIM COMMERCIAL RECREATION AREA SCH 91091062 Attached for your comment is the CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING DEPARTMENT s Notice of preparation of a draft Environmental Impact Report EIR for the CITY OF ANAHEIM COMMERCIAL RECREATION AREA Responsible agencies must transmit their concerns and comments on the scope and content of the EIR focusing on specific information related to their own statutory responsibility within 30 days of receipt of this notice We encourage commenting agencies to respond to this notice and express their concerns early in the environmental review process P ease direct your comments to LUCY YEAGER CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING DEPARTMENT 200 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD ANAHEIM CA 92805 with a copy to the Office o Planning and Research Please refer to the SCH number noted above in all correspondence concerning this project If you have any questions about the review process call Tom Loftus at [PHONE REDACTED] Sincerely L Oavid C Nunenkamp oeputy Oirector Permit Assistance ttactunents cc Lead Agency ---PAGE BREAK--- 6 6 O z I c r p i i I 1trJLI I r n iF I ft 0 II I ocr o o tier 1iU rl r nf dI i Iff J l I fJ o 0 0 0 0 Ififi if if fi ifl r R f r ff L fL f fr 11 ir rJ j f ii I J J Ii r r I I I f o i llo c 1f HI Aan I o fl iflfLeilrtiii I Il 9j u 0 r D 9 9 e I L 5 r fr if rlF l r L t L I L 1 i rI I t u I f l n rv 21 it ll L f JilL lif i FL 11f i 1f i 1 U III f f lIif i ii if i IlL I i i o irf 1f F i tJ liir t f 1 a r f 1 t r a i rrl 1 r Fl a 8i r i 1 i i I r i rrr I rf Pr Kelr trr iLl I Lli w i 1 I I I il f i i I l l ill r I L L g 9 l i r 12 02 i i 11I I t lo a z g t 0 gJ o J j I i I 9 I e r e S z z J r to 0 t i r B f I 1 LJ I 0 iril t t zLl e rr l 1itr H I IE r rap l S t l i fL I I fa I t r l l I If I o I i InnIl rfr r1 J I Ir L o o o o J n r Q so1 r FLI 1 i q c i I 0 l etlrl f 11 I o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iri fr Ir fi iflfi ir f iiif li fi li lrr p Ji Hr rJ i i e j I E r N i p i II 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 s i ii f iil Ifr j J I i III C e c t 1 t i o Irli l faS ir fiS z Iii z a 2 3 rB I L lo L il 1 l t l r I 3 r l I n t lo I r E 2 15 1 ejr r s a E I I 2 C i 0 i i 2 i o DO o o 1li I lr t 1 z 10 i o rrlI i 3 U i u It t I r r 3 ir lrz 8 o II r o o o J C i IIi OJr i H g ---PAGE BREAK--- Notice of Completion Appendix F Non il091062 Mm w Selle C1 ringllouse 1400 Tenth Sa S CA 9S 14 9161445 0613 iect Tltl C1TY OF ANAIIEIM COMMERC1AL REC TION A1U A l od ccn y Citv of Anaheim Plannino Deoar1 ment c mp Lucy Yeaoer S t 200 S Anaheim Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] Ext C Anaheim r 92805 Oranoe uy umy SCH 5440 Project LocatIo Counry Oranoe Coammn i y m C uss S w thin the boundaries of the Santa Ana I 5 Fvy 483 S a s L 3 SIIa lw 100 Golla o I Q A 4 GWA c rIr Aip t ly p No Sc ioII Twp lax WiIhiD LMIlcs Sca Hwyt 1i7 SR 22 WIIa WW S lII iI J HII h e ementary h f l 1 Sout ern Pae c c Garden Grove Onified LVL D L Docum t Typo Oranqe Unified CECA NEPA OJ o a o FiIaI t Ooaw ONOI CltIw OEA ODnAEIS Cl FONI EJNOP o Em Cono oNq Doc oDnA EIR OSoppI lIS o EIR Prior SOl No l o 0lIl0r Local Actloft Typo C CcnonI PIon UpcWe C lPIon Ccnonl PIon o Comaumuy P bn D Spc ili PIon o 101 PIon 0 U1li o Silo PIon ClJl Cl Cl U p O IacI Dmsioa CSulolliYilioa P1ftZl Mop T Mop CJ AJII J Cl Jlodoo Cl Coa aI Clour D Io m Typo W p I Cllliu A rv C O li t CommIlCl t J ndlulNi t Acre C R 1 OWFao iIi r AlCJ o TI a T o IwfimDc IIWni 0 r w OW T r CJ 11 W r ou r Refer to No e o Pr@ ar tio w EM If1oa EM If1oa Pl Oiect I DI j 1f I DocuIIIent E INII J IacI ur Quali ZJ Io J cutal Zone Z Dr narcl 3 E nonuc lo FU J Gl ScI oIllU Cl s a S IlO s IlO Sail I IlD Soliol W IlDTo CD TrUliclClI UlaooIl CJ V6 IlO W Quali 2l W Ow o WilcDil lCln wrA C 2liic ElI o oa Xi FIaod PIaioIIFIaodina o L uFn 11 I l CAoIo s 0 CD HoiIo IXI Ial Xi P lIlie s m nooiIi ia i P t anti U J2oN c U SEE ATIAO MENT Proj ct D acriptJon SEE ATI ACIIHDlT VC7 C no II F n ii n m ror II JON U SClin lrudvo r ro PJC CU IOW 1 31 ICue lillull l IJ O ---PAGE BREAK--- South Coast AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 9150 FLAIR DRIVE EL MONTE CA 91731 [PHONE REDACTED] e September 19 1991 Ms Lucy y ea er City of Anaheim Planning Dept 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 Notice ofPreparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Repon for The Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area District No ORC9109l3 01 Dear Ms Yeager Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced environmental document District staff has reviewed and assessed potential impacts that may result from the above referenced project Preliminary staff assessment indicates that the proposed project may adversely affect air quality Appropriate mitigation measures should be incorporated into the proposed project to reduce air quality impactS to insignificant level Refer to the District s Air Quality Handbook for Preparini Environmental Impact Reports to assess and mitigate adverse air quality impacts Upon completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report please forward two copies to e South Coast Air Quality Management District Planning Division 9150 Flair Drive EI Monte CA 91731 Attn Local Government CEQA If you have any questions please call me at [PHONE REDACTED] Yours truly Pro Supervisor EnVironmental Review h b A 15 ne n H lt r I rorJ r CD es Oha d be PO J y 10 c r ---PAGE BREAK--- e ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 Crescent Way Post Orneellox 520 Anaheim CA 92110 520 714 999 555 BUSINESS SERVICES September 20 1991 Ks Lucy Yeager Planning Department City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 Re Anaheim Commercial Recreational Area Specific Plan Dear Ks Yeager This letter is in response to the Notice of Preparation of an Environ mental Impact Report EIR for the Anaheim Commercial Recreational Area Specific Plan Although the Specific Plan will only address policy and procedural suidelines and will not address the individual impacts of specific proposed projects the District wishes to submit a statement of its concern for any growth and new development in this area The two schools nearest the Commercial Recreational Area are Loara 8igh School and Ball Junior 8igh School Tvo portable classrooms were added to the Loara campus last year increasinl Loara s capacity from 1633 to 1969 The projected 1991 92 enrollment for Loara is 1785 grades 9 12 An analysis of the projected cumulative growth for Loara has indicated that additional classrooms will not be needed through the 1995 96 school year when projected enrollment is expected to be 1929 The capacity at Ball Junior 8igh School is 1120 grades 7 8 Pro jected enrollment at Ball Jor 1991 92 is 934 however enrollment is expected to increase steadily through the 1995 96 school year to a tutal of 1257 Growth this year has exceeded projections The Anaheim Union 8igh School District is dedicated to meeting the educational needs of all its students by providing quality instruc tional programs within a learning environment Therefore close monitoring by both the City of Anaheim and the school district of all growth and new development within this area is essential to adequately plan for future student needs Sincerely Jt t 3 1 j a Rita S NeWlll 1l Assistant Superintendent Business Services ---PAGE BREAK--- September 27 1991 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 303 WEST COMMONWEALTH AVENUE FULLERTON CAUFORNIA 9 632 Telephone 7J4 738 6540 FAX 714 738 3IJO e Ms Lucy Yeager Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anheim CA 92805 P Analae m Comm rci l Recrea ion AreA lfic rlan Notice of Preparation DEIR Dear Ms Yeager The City of Fullerton Development following comments on the Anaheim Notice of Preparaeion DEIR Services Department wishes Commercial Recreation Area co provide the Specific Plan 1 Transportation Circulation The City of Fullerton assumes thae a deeailed and comprehetwive eraffic study will be prep ed and chae ehe poeeneially impacced interseceions in ehe City of Fullerton will be analyzed Two areas of concern are the Laman Street and Harbor Boulavard 9l Fra way intarsections 2 Growth Management Since this project is contiguous with to the North Coucty Growth Area 1 the GMA 1 Interjurisdictional Planning Forua would be a logical place for discussion of the project s pocential impacts on the north county circulation system Th 3r k tu for ecs1 rlleil of eh I ollD U lDok f Y lrc eo ra i tt i g thl draft EIR when it is available If you have any questions plaase contact Joel Rosen ae [PHONE REDACTED] Zg4i Development Services Department ep ---PAGE BREAK--- September 16 1991 Ms Lucy Yeager Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 Dear Ms Yeager Thank you for including the Transportation Corridor Agency as an agency review participant in the comment and review of the Anaheim C R Area Specific Plan Notice of Preparation At this time the Transportation Corridor Agency has no comments We appreciate the acknowledgment by the City of Anaheim If you have any questions please contact me at [PHONE REDACTED] Sincerely tUMit JW MlIcie Cleary M n Senior Environmental Analyst cc Steve Letterly file 345 Onaln eoMeso co 92626 [PHONE REDACTED] FAX [PHONE REDACTED] 7 TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCIES WdIiem Woo Iel r ex a c eC fI e r fa Can Ior Agency OvirTnen GIIddi Vasquez SuI arvwor 3rrJ Members Analletm It4IaIon v Orange Son Oemenll S8n Juan ea t5fnlno Sa Ana T YarDe LintIll Counoy fG ange Son Hills Can Ior Agency Owt TTIIIn John Cox NIIopcn aeoch Mamilf MS Costa Mae o nPant Innne Ugutla Nlgue V Newport Baach Son Oemenll Son JoWl Col Sl71lnO Sa Ana Colny f G ange ---PAGE BREAK--- e b f EXHIBIT A POTENTIAL EMISSION SOURCES AND MITIGATION MEASURES A To Minimize Construction Activity Emissions o Water site and equipment In the morning and evening o Spread soil binders on site unpaved roads and parmg areas o Re establish ground cover on construction site through seeding and watering Reduce Construction Equipment Emissions o Wash off trucks leaving site o Properly tune and maintain all equipment o Use low sulfur fuel for equipment Reduce Construction Related Traffic Congestion o Provide rideshare incentives o Provide transit incentives for construction personnel o Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interferences o Minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes o Provide a flagperson to guide the traffic properly o Schedule operations affecting roadways for off peak traffic hours Limit Emissions From Vehicle Trips and Roadway ConstrUction o Operate a Transponation management Plan per SCAQMD regulation XV o Provide commuter rideshare incentives o Provide commuter transit incentives o Promote Transponation Demand Management Associations o Establish a program of altemative work schedules o Establisb a telecommuting program o Scbedule goods movements for off peak traffic hours o Promote local shuttle and regional transit systems o Provide dedicated tum lanes as appropriate o Provide transit shelters o Provide bicycle lanes storage areas and amenities o Ensure efficient parking management o Prioritize ConstrUction of HOV lanes o Work closely with cities in the region to implement lDM goals Minimi7e Indirect Source Emissions o Implement energy conservation measures beyond state and local requirements o Install energy efficient street lighting o Include ener costs in capital expenditure analyses o Landscape WIth native drought resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits B c D E 01925 e ---PAGE BREAK--- r SOUTHERN CAWFORNIA I g S I COMPANY ORANGE COUNTtOMSION POBOX J3306 ANAHEIM FORN 33 Y September 12 1991 C1ty of Anahe1Jll Dept 200 S Anahe1Jll Blvd Anahe1lll CA 92805 Attention Lucy Yeager Subject EIR Anahe1Jll COIIIIDerc1al Recreation Area This letter 1s not to be illterpreted as a contractual COIIImitIIlent to serve the proposed project but only as an information service Its intent is to not1fy you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities ill the area where the above named project is proposed Gas service to the project can be served without any si nificant illlpact on the The service would be in accordance with the company s policies and extension rules on file with the CalifOrnia Public Utilities COIIIIIission at the t 1lIle contractual are made Due to the scope of the project we will be unable to provide IllaPS for the entire project Haps for the entire area are available for viewing at our Heaclquarters Office 1919 S State College Anabe1Jll The availabil1ty of natural gas service as set forth in this letter is based upon present conclitions of gas supply and regulatory polic1es As a pub11c uti11ty t be Southern CaJifornia Gas Company 1s under the jurisdiction of the federal regulatory agencies Should these agencies take any action wh1ch affects gas supply or the concli tion under wh1ch service 1s available gas service will be provided ill accordance with revised conclitions Residential SYStem Area Averaoel S illgle family Multi family 4 or less units Multi family 5 or IIOre units Yearly 1095 theru year c1well illg unit 640 theru year c1welling unit 580 theru year c1welling unit These estimates are based on gas COllSUllPtion in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company during 1975 ancI 1t should not be implied that any particular hOlle ap rt Ilent or tract of hoes will use these uounts of energy This 1s particularly e due to the State s insulation requ1reHnts and consUllers efforu toward energy conservation ---PAGE BREAK--- Estimaus ot gas usage tor non residential projec tll are developed on an individual basis and are obtained froIII a Harkel Services Stat representative by calling 714 634 31130 We have developed several proqrams which are available upon requen 1 0 provide assistance in selec t1ng the lIOn enerqy etficienl appliances or synelU tor a particular project It you desire further on any ot our energy programs please contact Ul1s ottice tor assistance Sincerely R ep t4 0 R B Aarv1g Techn1c al Supervisor Al du al1 01927 e ---PAGE BREAK--- I Riohl Of Ir 3 tl9 ElSl UtONlGC FIlKr ANIletm clOflllit 9 PACIFICCBELL UdocT C September 24 1991 City of Anaheim Planning Department Attention Ms Lucy Yeager 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim California 92805 RE PEIR Anaheim Anaheim Commercial Recreation C R Area Specific Plan Dear Ms Lucy Yeager Pacific Bell has existing facilities to serve this project Underground or aerial plant is located along Harbor Blvd West Street Walnut Street and Ball Road also along a portion of Katella Avenue We will construct additional facilities if necessary to satisfy subscriber needs Any additional questions that you have concerning this matter may be directed to me in Anaheim on [PHONE REDACTED] or to the Engineer Mike Slattery for that area on [PHONE REDACTED] Sincerely IlM IfIc c Jack E Stewa Right of D9814Z t JL lqon lSJIE cr anooo s 2nG tol l2a Jl 71H 16S7 IIa llJ QHI 9 ndg ---PAGE BREAK--- o zn il II tf I J J 0 IUP L ANTHONY l BAtI oHN v FONl EY JOHN GARTHE DOHN LAwRENCE Ft KR AE E 1Ft AUGUST F 1 ENAJN GEOAGE OSBORNE I GCOH W O N N08l S J WAlT September 17 1991 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Ms Lucy Yeager Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planning Depamnent 200 South Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 Preparation of EIR for the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Specific Plan Oorr LANGOON W OWEN L SAPIR First VaPrndIm LANT 11ONY s concr VII Wl1J IAM Ft MILi S JR Gon oI M AAY e JOHNSON cr rary This is in response to your notice dated September 9 1991 on the subject maner The EIR will cover a project area of 4835 acres within the city of Anaheim which will address the potential cumulative effectS of future development within that area The entire project area is within the Orange County Water Disnict and is therefore included within the Disnict s overall Groundwater Management Plan It is noted on page A4 of the Initial Study Checklist that water use will be evaluated in the EIR Staff believes that it is important that water use be considered in land use changes In addition it is requested that the repon evaluate the possible use of reclaimed wastewater in outside landscaping and other permissible uses The Disnict has been working closely with the City of Anaheim in a possible wastewater reclamation facility in the Anaheim area Use of wastewater would provide for greater utilization of the region s local water resources Very trUly yours 7 r u L h Nereus Richardson 1 Assistant Manager Disnict Engineer NR jcr lUNG AOORESS p o BOX 1300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 1272w JQO e 10500 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY TELEPHONE 7 163 5661 x 114 963 7 72 ---PAGE BREAK--- It II 0 C O CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER UUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION 2010 IOWA AVENUE SUITE 100 RlVERSIDE CAUFORNIA 92507 2409 PHONE [PHONE REDACTED] TELECOPIER 7H 781 6288 October 3 1991 Ms Lucy Yeager Senior Planner city of Anaheim Planning Department 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 f tf 1 5011I c Ai 01 23 50 0 1 OC e I 1 T 6 fj o c f llr7 NOTICE OF PREPARATION NOP OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR FOR THE ANAHEIM COMMERCIAL RECREATION C R AREA SPECIFIC PLAN ANAHEIM ORANGE COUNTY Dear Ms Yeager We have reviewed the NOP for this pro ect In response to the statutory concerns of this office the Draft EIR should address the following A Water Quality I Potential impacts of the proposed project on surface and groundwater quality Construction activities inclUding grading that could result in wate quality impacts Soil characteristics related to water quality potential for erosion and subsequent siltation increase or decrease in perCOlation Impacts of waste generation treatment and disposal Impacts of toxic substances handling and or disposal if appropriate B Mitigation of Adverse Impacts II Water Wastewater and Solid Waste Service A Water Availability of water for the proposed project Existing infrastructure lines tie ins location of water supply Applications or permits required for water acquisition Impact or calculated project demand on water supply ---PAGE BREAK--- I Ms LUCy Yeager city of Anaheim B Waste Disposal Treatment 2 October 3 1991 Types and amounts of waste materials generated by project Proposed waste treatment and disposal methods Existing infrastructure treatment facilities location current capacity treatment standards master treatment facilities expansion plan if appropriate treatment plant collector system location of major trunk lines and tie ins current capacity disposal facilities location capacity Applications or permits required to implement waste disposal Impact of calculated project waste volume on capacity of existing and proposed treatment and disposal facilities In addition either a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination system NPDES permit for any discharge of wastes to surface waters or a Waste Discharge Requirements WDR permit for any discharge of wastes to land will be required from this Regional Board These discharges of wastes can be those associated with but not limited to dewatering during construction dredging activities or stormwater runoff from industrial areas construction sites and or facilities which use hazardous materials Also the new stormwater regulations published by EPA on November 16 1990 in the Federal Register 40 CFR Parts 122 123 and 124 require a NPDES permit for runoff from construction sites of five acres or more Any proposed use of reclaimed water will also require that a Report of Waste DiSCharge be filed with this office Please note that the time frame for the issuance of a permit can be as long as 180 days from the time the permit application is accepted as complete We look forward to reviewing the Draft EIR when it becomes available If you have any questions please call me at [PHONE REDACTED] Sincerely A ijielO Water Resources Control Engineer Regulations Section cc Tom Loftus State Clearinghouse AEA17 4003anah nop 01931 e ---PAGE BREAK--- ANAHEIM H O M E P O BOX 6103 Holiday Station ANAHEIM CA 92612 71 11 7511 tloME NERS 8AINT AININCl THEIR@ NVIRONMENT octobe 4 1991 Lucy Yeager Senior Planrler Planning Department 00 S Anallei nl Ell vd Anaheim CA 92805 LJe r Ms Yeager This Letter is in response to the Commerc ial Recreation Ares Spec i fi PIn Envi ornment l Impact report Anaheim H o M E has primarily the same concerns to raise in regard to this Specific Plan as we listed in June in connection with the Disneyland Resort EIR Listed aga in l Impact or qul i ty of lifE in adjacent rEsidenti al neighl orlloods MO E spEcific lly thE availability of housi ng fOl add i ti onCl l enlp Oy ees nd their i mpact on schools libraries and overburdened public services Cost 5 CJo addi ti onBl demands on Pol i ce and Fi t e set vi ces Wht Mdditional demands will bE made on City Utilities 4 Impact of increased vieitor ar d err ployee traffic on ur ace street eer i ng resideflti al nei ghborhoods Financial What impact will Plan hav on the Cities General Fund If C O P s or bonding is used to fund pr jEcts hon will it limit the Cities ability to fund future F ublic prC1jeet 10 wh t e tent will Errtinent Donlairl bE e erci ed7 6 Wht wi 11 be the Ef feet of i ncr Eilsed noi se cor gesti on ii pollution itste disposil l ect on the Quality of life of ELIt round i fig Ilei ghbor hoods The fClCI IS Cif OLlI COflCern if both E lr fi is on the surrounding r sidenti l n lghb rl oods and the CIty of AndheIffl il l lllole In order to properly ddre55 ttlese trn we sl ttIet the SpeCIfic rlloUt rr oject Are Cot be r llrl d I f lE IC fhp tt t 9 81 lp code and l h t fJCoI t of U1C 81 1 lp cr eJ Stll ltl o C n Ave S1 f e err ul II O M E 01932 ---PAGE BREAK--- Octob 8 1991 pm WILSON w I @ STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS 0 TR4 SPORTAT10N CENCf DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OISTJ ICT 12 2501 ItULI MAN STREEi S NT ANA CA 9 270 FILE SCHII PM I ATSD NOP ORA 5 36 38 MS Lucy Yeager Planning D pa tmnt City 01 Anah im 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anah im CA 92805 SUBJECT Tne Ananelm CQmme c i l ReC reatlon C R ea Soecif i Plan De Ms Yeager Thank you for the opportunity o review and comment on tne Notice 01 P pa tion NOP 01 D aft Envionm ntal Impact R pot DEIR amnding th City s G n l Pl n ncomp ssing 483 5 c s of land in the City of Anaheim Commercial Recr eation Area locatec g n lly wst of tn 1 5 F w y b tw n O ng wood Av nu and vermont Street and east of Walnut Steet Our concerns are as follo s e 1 Ho will the r eclaSSlficati on of land use and C1r OQosed orojects effect the in err gi on l tr ns ortation sYstem netwo k If 1 t lel tr 1 5 SJ9ni1icant cnange i n tr 1fl circulation and or l vel of ser Vlce tnat imp cts n lgn oring Jurl dict ons ho ooes e City intend to coordin te w th tnes oJ cent clties coun les and other State agencies7 1 Caltrans ocreC lat t n Clty S I TfO o C OlT bine all tn major po rams tn t are relevant to tnlS roject Our cone ns remain tn same as s ateo n tne tt aated Junle l c l Oisneyland Resort S Ie 111c lan S atalneo letter Cart1cul ly int st d 1M tn dISCUssion ot future taMsportation lmp cts on the St te s 1acilltleS as ocosed 1M tn Disneyland Plan s well as tne otner clans listeo on cages 4 5 of the Nap 3 Furthe more cl se lnCJ n w I lrl C O I v ic l emlSS10ns I le l en Pe I cesJr l e lT cl lnc t t e County 3 o r an lemtn sme t n nm l F irotpct 1 l l AQency Gu dellnes no eoul t J ---PAGE BREAK--- e LAWYERS BEST BEST KRIEGER L JCt4 r n J l L aOIoI IOl N t Inltla OOUGL AS I OW wlUJ 1t 000WOU f I CI 1UJl T0lII C GAU alttQOlln W l 1UMIQIIIoI AOL T 1 Ut1il W l NN S UlIIT OAU A IoIOI MU Cl I vtOL 1IofoIlCN CJol 1t L NTllit IEVGIN TAI lIAKA IIlICKAla T Dt aASll T QoI JC lIotfoI O UN TlMOT1ool1 M CONIIICl I 0 lItIr VC fC llt I WOIJ CUl tT1Utol O l t 0UVl 1It T lotI lMAS So SUN r ANI L J IIlreMUCI iPOWW MOW D C3oO M WIQNACL T MlXIOJ I l t JIMlEM CCI1WCH IIIt DfTM A AI MAlItC t QIUoN T o IIlOTnCMAlP Ut AlICIa J WMTIIiII A IillUtI l Dl t T TMOWAI J MlCMALL 1U ttIIClI M O III TM OIIII N IUNCI III g J wv uMIW I DI O IiCOTTC m4 AClItIaTl u ca CUWItKE IIII QIilICKJIIn UND L M vn IIMMIII LIWfS c u M AOI rl l Nll It D A DAYlO UNOT L UAU I t1 A Il m WILJ 1AMO OAMLIJIIQ TT MOItftII 1m Y QUNlIoI C c rr AUN MNoIT M I lItC QMtNUI Of 1Y eeT Juut TWAItO MlIGS JUCWlUJ J NICDU lItOeEltTW MA IIIOJIlU IOI J ClL g T AH A urn ATtItlCaW IUMt W TM J A SOIIIlO MAYON TClN MAMlA UaftJt MICMLUZ OUIEL LI TT E 1t AQIt o tMu nwIt WI J QItMI 00 SSlOf l SClUAA 3110 UNIVDt1rr r AVENlJt I OIT cr IIOX 1021 CAlJ A 82502 l 6M l 5C TtU 71 1 OU 6C a612 lWJSAN e CHlInST O IU DOOIClN o lInI lt MIl L W1 ll Al l h1u I J ufJ AD u lItANDOl PN JAMn JAMU MAlilSMAU I 1tUOCllJ M lUM A a tlft C rtII fMIA Ql ANO MNft C OUTIIlU IIIIMntlAc DAMn c u R MOU I I liID IoLII Q O CMMItLD C IICClU PI DALZ T W U C OU CHllIIIT1fC LIIICN J IlIIICI COfMGJIl MCMot RD lItIOIU LDT IVU 1IC II tIlIl w MTMORD IKST 11 1 1 lAMa N 1011 1 11 1 1 lUlKfiII auT n 1l A M Iatus n 1tAICHD 1I 1 11 DIn u o 1I I October 9 1991 L VLA TELECOPIER AND MAIL Lucy Yeaqer Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planninq Department 200 South Anaheim Anaheim California 92805 Re Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Specific Plan Dear Ms Yeaqer This law firm acts as special counsel to the Anaheim City School District We have been asked by the District to respond to your letter of September 9 1991 reqardinq the solicitation of information in connection with the preparation of an environmental impact report EIR for the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Specific Plan The District will be affected by any development in the proposed project area The District has therefore asked us to present its comments reqardinq the project 1 In re8sed Dev@lonment Althouqh the proposed project intends to provide quidance for future proposals and does not propose any specific development projects for the area the District is very concerned about the ramifications of any development in the area The District provides elementary and secondary public school servic s to the City of Anaheim within the area encompassed by the project The majority of District schools in the project area are operatinq either above or near capacity Therefore one matter of particular concern to the District is whether or not the implementation of the Specific Plan will have an effect upon or result in a need for new 7D69 r t 1 1 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- LAW OllII lCt5 011 lEST lEST KRIEGER Lucy Yeager October 9 1991 Page 2 or altered education facilities or services The rnitial study indicated that although the adoption of the Specific Plan would not directly result in development impacts future implementation of the Specific Plan could result in development impacts Crnitial Study page 1 Any increased development could result in significant increases in demand for public school services rt is essential to the District that these issues are addressed in the ErR The project could also result in new employment opportunities created by any projected evelopment and increased demand for public services and facilities attendant with the implementation of the Specific Plan The effect of any new employment opportunities will be to cause increases in student population in District schools School districts are required to provide services to all children whether they live within the district or if their parents are employed within the District Since the majority of District schools serving the project area are currently operating above capacity any increase in student population will have serious implications Thus we would suggest that the ErR study the extent to which physical changes such as overcrowded classroolllS and school playground space will result from implementation of the proposed project In addition the rnitial Study indicated that implementation of the Specific Plan could result in an increase in demand for public services including schools Crnitial Study page A 4 The District schools are already operating at well above capacity The District s total capacity is 12 864 and its projected enrollment for the 1991 92 school year is 15 038 Any development impacts resulting from implementation of the Specific Plan may have a serious adverse impact on the District s inadequate and overcrowded facilities Regarding any prospects for expansion or renovation of existing facilities the District is presently applying for State funds for both modernization and construction of new facilities It is not likely however that the Ois rict will receive funds in the near future Therefore any increase in demand for school services will have serious impacts on the District 2 Environmental Issues The proposed project is likely to generate impacts in the areas of air quality noise traffic circulation and recreational opportunities At various points the Initial Study discovered potential impacts in each of these areas Potential impacts in these areas might rise to significant levels The adverse impacts from each of these areas may have interactive effects on school 73369 01935 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e LAW O ICtS 0 BE ST BE ST KRIE GE R Lucy Yeager October 9 1991 Page 3 services and students that require examination in the EIR For example studies of changes in traffic circulation and intensity resulting from implementation of the Specific Plan should include discussion of increased traffic volume in areas around schools and its effect on students going to and from school Other areas of particular concern regarding this project are air quality and noise Short and long range air quality impacts of construction and increased commercial activities should be examined Also the potential of increased emission generated by vehicles traveling neighborhood streets where schools are located should be e Zll lined as to their effects on schools and school children The Initial Study indicated that future development of land uses allowed by the Specific Plan could create short term project specific air quality and noise impacts resulting from construction Initial Study page A l Long range air quality and noise impacts resulting from increased development should also be considered Often school sites are considered noise sensitive land uses which require mitigation measures Mitigation measures should be devised for any of the above referenced impacts if discovered to be significant Examples of mitigation measures which may be required include but are not limited to provision of signaling devices and crossing guards to mitigate traffic impacts on school areas sound proofing and air conditioning of school buildings funding for the acquisition of school sites and construction of facilities and expansion of existing playground space Please let us know if we can be of any assistance Jchn E Brovn of Best Best Krieger Special Counsel Anaheim City School District JEB dk cc Jack Sarnicky Assistant Superintendent Business Services Karia Elena Romero Director Strategic Planning 13369 ---PAGE BREAK--- J BEST BEST KRIEGER LAWYERS AIII Tt MLL fTl rWOR TM MICMAI L I AHOCLSCIIN I UIt It 1 NUM Ou t 11 1 DOUO IU WJU IAM O DAH IIIt lIlI oWCll 1r AfifTDHIA nlot MOItftIS QA IP Q QOlIftK j O INH IoUL T KutW aTEWlH c o u Aa I tOUtlID DAVID I UJIION IllUMT DW CMlItIST NTIJ EUGENE ToVlM A IRIC llIlI C OT U81LT Dl TA D WAM TIMOTM t CON JUUt HA1 WAIa IMICrtAI I O rUA I MCOI U CUM UL DANtU E QUVlP w vP TIoIOMlI a 1oLOVM DANIC I UOH AIIIIICC L WbS lOot E NID 00L Qa TVoN I MCHALlT L 1 I O MPl DO J ICH eMNn l I 1lIIINIC 11 ICKW PlNIIC I JOHJIlII ITN 1IlAIC II I IIIIM11N A wELLElIt MlaON D l lE u NI T TMOMAr I IilICWML CtICllM MAI DM WINSTON D NE HI 1t I l 1INOW orDIlQt It Itf tD un I MNlItA tIAaTI Jt WIWAM O I M nc I 1N t CfIIISTr MCIt CLAMCl JIll MICICU I0UIUZTTt LKNIlOlU P ETPt I IIPAl L U WII Gt VIO M CL UIIlM c a o waa CMWIO I c rLDAl LDf I auIIG tuaM C HAUSS T I CJCJo ON MoUhl lit MOWE IIL Il1 fo fllC U WIU JNlf I AOAMS lCC It M lAMna 1II MoUt rtAU tt IUM lI rlU nwTH A II O MAl ft I nt rV ItAc AINU C MU llIQUYlH D MA O ctWIILD t IUJU Dt DALC LlM IIt CIi I NIt PJI1 Flnc 7324Q Jit c leT 19S1 DtpLANNING ON c 50 UNlVER rTV AVENUE Ofr11cr l02 CAu ORHIA 82502 C7I NMI6 1 SO TtU 714 JOa a 12 a CleHINI T vr ftIClNO T CJ JN7 MMD N IUttlcatJt 1I 1 7 1UOClC I NII MM ta IUSo72e04 IUlMCMOMIIUlOl I HII GNTAMO 1I I october 17 1991 VlA TELECOprZR AND nIL L Lucy Yeaqer senior Planner City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheilll Anaheim California 92805 Re Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Specific Plan Dear Ms Yeaqer This law firm serves as special counsel to the Anaheim City School District On October 9 1991 we sent a letter in response to your letter of september 9 1991 concerninq the preparation of an environmental impact report EIR for the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Specific Plan In our letter it was inadvertently stated that the District provides elementary and secondary public school services to the City of Anaheilll within the area to be affected by the project In fact the District provides only elementary school services to the project area This is to notifY you of the amendment Thank you for your attention Very truly yours Kichelle Ouellette for Best Best Krieqer Special Counsel Ahaheim City School District MO dk cc Maria Elena Romero Director Strateqic Planninq 01937 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e It fl1r Z c L J r f OCT 19SJ D PLAIiIiI l J PAFi7M Nr MICHAEL M RUANE DIRECTOR EM 12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA SANTA ANA CALiFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS P O BOX 4048 SANTA ANA CA 92702 4048 TELEPHONE [PHONE REDACTED] FlU 834 2395 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY OCT 2 4 1991 F1Lf Lucy Yeager Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 S Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim CA 92803 NCL 91 141 L SUBJECT NOP for the Anaheim Commercial C R Area Specific Plan Dear Ms Yeager The above referenced item is a Notice of Preparation NOP for the City of Anaheim The project encompasses approximately 483 5 cres of land and is located west of the 1 5 Freeway south of Vermont Street east of Valnut Street and North of Orangewood Avenue in the City of Anahei The proposed project will est blish objectives policies land use nd densities and development standards design guidelines for the sys tic i ple entation of the General Plan for the re The County of Orange has reviewed the NOP resulting in the following comments BICYCLE TRAILS Page 5 Other Transport tion Studies In consideration of bicycle tr vel as an ltern tive ode of transport tion and recreation the Specific Plan should explore the fe sibility of i ple enting a bicycle trail network within the project loc tion as itig tion me sure to reduce traffic congestion vehicul r noise and ir pollution The development of a bicycle commuter network will help to chieve ir quality go ls of SCAQMD s Regulation XV the Air Quality Manage ent Plan the recent Feder l Clean Air Act AIR QUALITY The ir quality an lysis for this project should be prep red in accordance with the techniques recommended by the Californi Air Resources Board and the South Coast Air Ou lity Manageaent District CIRCULATION The project s pl nned land use intensity should correlate vith the cap city of the local and regional circulation system This will ensure b lance between the land uses nd the circul tion syste ---PAGE BREAK--- Should use intensification require changes to the Haster Plan of Arterial Highways HPAB then the City should coordinate these with the County to that both circulation plans remain consistent ensure Storm water runoff from the Specific Plan Area is captured primarily by the Anaheim Barber City Channel C03 Small parts of the area drain to the East Garden Grove Vintersburg Channel C05 and the Carbon Creek Channel B01 All three of these facilities lie outside of the Specific Plan Area Our land use maps for the City of Anaheim indicate that the entire Specific Plan Area is already considered commercial and or recreational No increase in storm water runoff above what has been planned for should occur as a result of development in the area L Local drainage fac11ities should meet the requirements of the City of Anaheim and should protect structures from the 100 year flood POPULATION EMPLOYMENT HOUSING A section on population employment and housing should be included in the analysiS Also data on population employment and housing should reflect the County s current set of OCP 88 demographic projections VATER RESOURCES The Specific Plan should incorporate state of the art vater conservation measures to improve the efficiency of water utilization in this highly visible public recreation area The water conservation measures are reco ended to be consistent with those described in the Memorandum of Understandin2 le2ardinr Urban Vater Conservation in California as recommended by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and adopted by the Municipal Vater District of Orange County Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the NOP Please send five 5 copies of the draft EIR to Kari li oni at the above address One unbound copy that we could reproduce would suffice If you have questions please call Hs Rigoni at [PHONE REDACTED] Very truly yours Joan S Golding Program Hanager Regional Coordination Office CH tit 1102215102908 01939 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e C I T Y o F 8UENA PAR K so BEACH BOULEVARD p O BOX 5IXfI PHONE C A L FOR N A 90622 October 2 1991 City of Anaheim Attention Lucy Yeaqer 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 SUBJECT Response to Notice of Preparation of an EIR and Scopinq Meetinq for the Recreation C R Area Specific Plan Dear Lucy The City of Buena Park has reviewed your notice of Preparation for the Recreation C R Area Specific Plan Althouqh we feel that the Specific Plan will not have a direct impact upon our city there may be some indirect impacts Based on this review we offer the fOllowinq which should be discussed within the Environmental Impact Report 1 Impacts on your housinq residents within the project our housinq stock stock by displacement of area may have an impact on 2 Impacts on Employment and how employment pool within Anaheim this miqht as well as chanqa the surroundinq 3 An economic analysis that discus es out all fiscal impacts should be prepared Thank you for qivinq us the opportunity project We look forward to reviewinq Impact Report in the next few months questions reqardinq our Please convenience to on this the Environmental If you have any contact me at your i Rick Warsinski Assistant Director of Development Services Planninq Buildinq ---PAGE BREAK--- tl lID OCl llI nlnElIlf S1S West Seventh Street 121h Floor Los Angeles Cellfornla 90017 34350 [PHONE REDACTED] FAX 213 2361S25 EXECL T1VE COMMm EE PNciOcaI ii cc VIGIft CoIwy JoiuI flyoa S 1 WMr Mm ViccPN idmt Rcp uof an nwdmo Cowny JDbn Lon w M s coa dVic c AD SubCMl s 1 01MI CounI ilk AftUlno9ich S u 0 Ml NrwIiOr On a1 C Ily Harrieu w Rl Cor zmy Mdba DulUap s n Bau rduloeouy Jon MikS w ew afl os Aqlll CcIInry UUM clo CI of lm1lCIW Cou ftly SltI1IM IlCl aM n 1CY ua of OnnIC J ln f i Iri lO PtO 1 cUClorRJ ccGUnl JUG itrOUf ta lrI lorw no laJ acy CIIKI o oc nwn Cowaay wIdum Itt S Il l Pa u ClIY ol1 or All Tom Bradl N T Cll U lll C u I If Cll o l arIa B Cla nct atiUl c oucy CU IMITT EE CUADt l1al Cro1U M T II t llMl w tiC lIolOlU D M 7O IrfI T c ft rfton c l i f lvY Scull t rr l 11111 hen CornrI WNI C orICm l N C Hu man c CU lcn Al A kCl D l ECATES IC l nL C I IZ Ih krl G I COltJlU llo nil lJ I kl l LIt 6l tll f T r October 21 1991 Ms Lucy Yeager City of Anaheim Planning Dept 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 RE ANAHEIM COMMERCIAL RECREATION C R AREA SPECIFIC PLAN SCAG CLEARINGHOUSE OR 55200 NPR Dear Ms Yeager We have concluded review of the above project and determined that it is regionally significant Enclosed you will find a copy of our general requirements for environmental documents being prepared for regionally significant projects The EIR should also address conformity with the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan AQMP using procedures included in the Guidance for Implementation of AQMP Conformity Procedures A description of the project was published in the October I 1991 Semi Intergovernmental Review Listing for public review and coment The project title and SCAG number should be used in all correspondence with SCAG concerning this project Correspondence should be sent to the attention of the Clearinghouse Coordinator When additional documents are sent to SCAG please provide three copies so that the project is generated to the respective If you have questions please contact Maureen Farley at [PHONE REDACTED] Thank you r r J rj r u J PAUL HAT ANAKA Clearinghouse Official Al1L w T1 1 U C I s Sus L All C y ElIIIt4IMu s OnaICc y 0 Y as a 1 t lt1CuILaraa s s u C O Uy Iv er v c Vr ca lt ew olt alc Vie n h Jf At auftOfiaDl1 c oIuauc ul 0 Ilk C W U Uy C ofOr cc 1 0 ra er C Ne tlw h C u sofk a r a cu c u SIA C 0 to r 11 MI6 0 oI C V ea lo Cu oI1 M kKUtlllA tutft C llao a1 C MIC I 0 1 O l dl1ad c Ali rJ c IIl lwloour ll4ot 1 A M CtMno 0 1I w M o1 o u 01941 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e It ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND REVIEW GENERAL REQUIREMENTS for NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS MmGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS NOTICES OF PREPARATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS ENVIRONME TALASSESSMENTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS The aeneral requirements for the review of ona1l siplillcant projects are basedon the disclosure ofImpacts and aproaram for their mllleation u required under CEQA The requirements used presenU by SCAG arerevised u shown below to provide for the adoption of the Growth Manqement Plan Regional MoblUt Plan and AIr Quality Manacement Plan Revised on No rember 1 1989 If any proposed project s wiD or could cause enviroomernal impacts suchimpacts must beconsistem with the forecastS included in OrowthManaeCIDcm Plan andRegional MobilityPlan approved in FebNary 1989 andthe Air Quality Management Plan approved in March 1989 The relationships of the fo and policies mentioned above mUS be acldre scd and evaluated whe er applicable Therefcm all ofbe doc umCIIIS 1isted above and OCher such stUdies and reportS should the issues below N0l all issues wm apply to 1 What are the ImpaCU of the proposed project on populatioDemployment adhousine Give be JIOWth fore caslfor each pbase of the projecl 1fItwed 1 Me the IJ Owth IIWIqeJDeDt aoals and policies complied with 3 Are the JolWBollSiDa BaIUlce perforn nce aoals beiD met Is oil III tenDs ofthe IIlcome and wqe Ine1s ofthe local WlIrkforce 5 What wiD be the cumulatiYe Impacts of the project III the subrqion Bow bthb related to the Growth ManaaemenI Ulfoncastattheexpected dateofproject completion orphase completion 6 Are theprovisions of the AIrQuaIlt Manqunent Plan Implemented at the locaIlnei and thiD the subregion WhIt are the air quallt Impacts of the project Are the beineaddressed 7 For any project with transportation corridor level Impacts what are the lona tena Impacts L What assumptions are used in estimatilll the total trips aenerated by the project 9 What are the related vehicular emissions ---PAGE BREAK--- 10 What Is the annual Impact on total trips Ilenerated b1 this proJect 11 Discuss the transportation demand man J ement proJl lUll chosen for the project Will mass transit rideshariD and other tripreduction stratet ies be promoted Q lanUfy the effeas or eacb COIIIporlCIIl or these pl Opams Provide an schedWe for eacb COIlIponent IdenUfy the persal or agency responsible ror monilOring and adminstering the pl Ognm Who wil1 opel2lC Ihc proeram7 How wil1 the program be fuDded I 11 Does the project Impact a hi hwa1 either directl1 or indlrecll1 Does It include ahillhwa1 in a mllIllalion measure U 10 Thedocument IIIIISt SlIlC wbe tile project iDc1udcs Hit h Occupancy Vehicles HOV lr1nsilWay mdI or mW dfIow It must rwe bow milipliOll measur owiD Pl Olllote he use or HOVs Ir1nsitway andor mixed now improvement Itmust State whe1her the bit hway is iJlQuded in the Call1 111S Disuict Service Manac mem Plan 13 Transportation must adhere to the foDowinc criteria The impact of lIIe overall project on air quality in the long lClIIl must be analyzed on a transporwion corridor level even if be project is phased or incrementally developed The impact or tile project on air quality must be compaled with the impacu or the project alternatives on a transpOrtaliOll corridor level The altemalives must also be compmd with each other The demand managCIDem pes HOV improvements and ll IDSit lie required 10 be evaluated as alternatives and IS miligaliOll measur oIf ne uvy 14 AlJ PROJECTS MUSTSTATE THE FOLLOWING o Whether the1 are lDcluded in the Jlqional Transportation Improvement Provam 0 Whether the are with local pl llllinll documents o Whether the1 are as constrained or lDIconstTained in the lqional MobiUt1 Plan o Whether the are CDnsistent with the specillc policy elements of the Rqlonal Mobility Plan Section IV IS What are the Impacts If au oftheproject oa Water Wastewater ar Solid and hazardous waste Enere School facilllies Environmelllal cIoc umems wiD be ewed by SCAG at the approplUte lime willIin lIIe public miew period or public beariDC proccdwes Please send IhIcopies or the c oc umelllS wilen they are lWIy for clistribulim FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL THE SCAG CLEARINGHOUSE [PHONE REDACTED] 01943 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- It Lucy Yeager Senior Planner Planning Depl 200 S Ananheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 6 u Cr NOV IBSu PLANNING DEPART N7 0 II 1 Od 19 1991 Ms Yeager I have some CODcems regarding the Commercial RecreatioD Area and its impeDding EnviroDmeDtaJ lley ort Finand fnremost is the inability of tbe resideDts in Anaheim to have meaningful input in the ptoceSS of addressiDg specific issues that occur wheD reports such as this an geDerated I aneDded the SCOpiDg meetiDg Od 2 1991 aDd I came away with the feeliDg that resideDts especially resideDts that own property OD the border of tbe C ll area should be giveD the opportunity to express their view One meetiDg is clearly Dot eDough time to foalS liD the issues This becomes more appar eDt as time goes by lIDd some of the parametelS change tie Disneylands decisioD to build or DOt to build in the area I say this DOW so that qUestiODS CaD be directed to the very people who staDd to be afieded the most by any proposals that ultimately come from this study This may sound self serving because I do live diredly across tbe street from the C ll area aDd if the people who decide these manelS lived directly across tbe street from the C ll area it might be clearer as to why fm sayiDg this No ODe knows bener about a giveD streetarea tbaD the pelSOD or pelSODS who live then The proposals tbat eveDtually become the goals will be acceptable to the majority if more input CaD be given fm DOt suggesting tbat thePlanning Dcpt doesn t have the 8DSwelS Dor am I suggesting that I have all the What I am suggesting is that iD the city ofAnaheim groups or OrganizatiODS exist tbat CaD give positive aDd coDsuuc tive input OD the problems tbat will oc c ur witb such projects Without feedback from in the planning stages ultimately the residents will feeltbe need to express themselves in ODe form or 1UI0ther the latest example would be the fOrmiDg of the ACT coalitiOD to oppose the utility tax Some would say that the system worked because the people did voice tleir did effect acleae I 5 lY the eneo zy e ctcd by bnth 5ides nf that issue could have heeD cbaDDeled in amore coDStnic tive lUId positive maDDer if oDly tbe vety groups that efieded that outcome could ofhad a say in the planning stages of the Deed to raise taxes or trim tbe budgel Now before studies are completed lUId priorities are fiDalized the ideas aDd SUggestiODS of the residents of AIIaheim should be beard These are tbe same people tbat will ultimately pay for aDd live witb the dccisioDS that will be made regardiDg the C llarea WorkiDg togetber will allow tbe City of AIIaheim lUId its residents to be partDelS in the growth awaitiDg us all DismissiDg the good intentioDs ofthese groups and orgaDizatioDs within AIIaheim will ODly CRate teDsioD and coDflia As I said earlier tbe energy will be expeDded by everyoDe iDvolved wily Dot chanDel it iD a COD stlUdive maDDer so tbatthe beDefits caD be sbared by all It ADabeim B O M E Member JohD Carrisosa 1326 W ColoDial Ave ADabeim CA 92801 o ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF GARDEN GROVE CALIFORNIA 11391 ACACIA PARKWAY P O BOX 3070 GARDEN GROVE CALIFORNIA 92642 GARDEN GROVe October 23 1991 Ms Lucy Yeager Senior Planner City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Blvd Anaheim CA 92805 Dear Ms Yeager SUBJECT Response to Notice of Preparation for the Draft Environmental Impact Report EIR for the Anaheim Commercial Recreation C R Area Specific Plan Thank you for extending us the opportunity to provide project related concerns that may affect our community Do to the size and magnitude of the proposed specific plan and its future developments the following discussion outlines our concerns that the Draft EIR for the Anaheim Commercial Recreation C R Area Specific Plan should address 1 Traffic The scope of the proposed project will significantly increase traffic in the northern part of Garden Grove The traffic study should include all of Garden Grove arterials and identify the extent of impacts radiating out from the project It also needs to identify LOS Level of Services values for build out conditions on Harbor Blvd West St Euclid St and Katella Avenue Mitigation measures and impact fees need to be established for maintenance after build out 2 Roadway Surface The report should also address such items as surface wear potential roadway repairs due to excessive vehicle trips including responsible parties for street maintenance and other street related concerns within the City of Garden Grove 3 Sewerage and Treatment Facilities The Draft EIR should address the issue of availability of capacity in the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County sewerage and treatment facilities with respect to possibility of the project limiting capacity for adjoining cities 01945 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- It lucy Yeager City of Anaheim October 23 1991 page 2 4 Cumulative Effect The implementation of the proposed project together with other development projects in the vicinity will result in cumulative envorinmental impacts to the northern residential parts of Garden Grove In addition the increase in noise air quality and traffic circulation during weekdays weekends and holidays should also be addressed within the Draft EIR S Economic Impacts The Draft EIR should address how ultimate build out under the proposed land use designations which will impact the local economy ie jOb creation hotel occupied increased tourism etc I hope the above information will be helpful in your analysis Once all the comments have been addressed and completed in the Draft EIR please forward a copy to Debra Hart Advance Planning Supervisor at the above address In addition please include Garden Grove as part of your mailing list for any future public hearings and workshops on the proposed project We are very interested in working with the City of Anaheim to better understand the direction which development in this area is taking and what possible impacts may affect us Therefore we are requesting to participate in your review process of the Anaheim Commercial Recreation C R Area Specific Plan and any other future specific plans within the Anaheim Stadium Disneyland and Anaheim Convention Center areas The City of Garden Grove appreciates the opportunities given by the City of Anaheim to review and comment on proposed developments in your city and wishes to thank you again for your assistance and cooperation in this matter Should you have any questions regarding this response please feel free to call Rosalinh Ung at [PHONE REDACTED] Respectfully Frank A Schuma Director D elopment Services Depar nt B R 1 h U 1 osa 1n ng I Associate Planner L It ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 n J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA PO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92728 8 27 108A4 ELLIS FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92708 7018 714 962 24 October 30 1991 Ij ic hJJ J1 l 7 OC p I lag O AZ q4 4 1 fIAt 1t6 0 y f v I 0 Ir I I I 7 IIII Ms Lucy Yeager Senior P1anner Planning Oepartment City of Anahei m 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Post Office Box 3222 Anaheim CA 92803 Subject Notice of Preparation NOP of an Environmental Impact Report EIR on the Anaheim Commercial C R Area Specific Plan This is in response to y ur notice dated September 9 1991 received on October 9 1991 that the City will prepare an Environmental Impact Report EIR for the development of a 484 u re irregular triangular shaped parcel generally bounded by Walnut Street on the west Orangewood Avenue on the south and the Santa Ana Freeway on the northwest The plan does not propose any specific development projects at this time However it is intended that commercial recreational uses be provided on any future proposed development projects This area is within County Sanitation District No 2 CSD 2 and previous planning has shown high intensity industrial commercial for this parcel In addition to this plan CSD 2 has responded to the NOP for the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR on June 14 1991 The same comments apply to this plan regardin9 adequate sewage capacity discussed in that plan as long as overall development intensities are consistant with previous planning You are requested to calculate the expected sewage to be generated from the proposed development and compare it to the District s previous plans For your calculations use the flow coefficients of 3230 gallons per day per acre gpd acre for commercial 4520 gpd acre for industrial 7755 gpd acre for high intensity industrial commercial 200 gpd 1000 sf gross floor area GA for high intensity office or high rise commercial 150 gpd room for hotels and motels 100 gpd 1000 sf GFA or commercial shops and stores 50 gal seat for restaurants and 200 gpd acre for recreation and open space usage 01947 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e It COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS I ORANGE COUNTY CAUFORNIA Lucy Yeager City of Anaheim October 30 1991 Page Two 10844 EL US AVENUE PO BOXS127 FOUrflAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92726 8127 71 962 2 1 Wastewater generated within the Districts service area is processed at treatment plants located in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach The Districts operate under an NPDES permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency This permit has a set discharge limit for biochemical oxygen demand BOD and suspended solids SS At the present time the BOD in the Districts discharge is close to the limit therefore significant land use changes will impact the Districts facilities Industrial users should take on site measures to reduce the load strength of the sewage Commercial users should incorporate all practical and mandated water conservation measures All users should use ultra low flow water fixtures to reduce the volume of sewage to the system The ability of the Sanitation Districts to provide sewage collection treatment and disposal services for this development is dependent on the continued expansion of treatment plant and disposal capacity All Sanitation Districts treatment projects require a Permit to Construct PTC from the South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD In addition the Sanitation Districts expansion projects require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPDES Permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board Issuance of such permits are conditional upon a finding of conformity with an approved air quality manag ment plan Such a finding requires that the expansion be sized and service phas d according to the pattern of growth for your agency s service area as shown in the latest Growth Management Plan adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments SCAG Regulations adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD pursuant to the Air Quality Management Plan AOMP may also impact the Districts expansion projects The Sanitation Districts ability to expand and serve this project is therefore dependent upon your agency s conformance with the adopted Growth Management Plan and SCAQHD regulations to implement the AQMP You should therefore review this project in light of the adopted Growth Management Plan and the AQMP Thank you for the opportunity to C R Area Specific Plan heim Commercial Recreation omas M Dawes Director of Engineering THD CW sj1 ENG ElU LS4 cc Chuck Winsor Susan Nichols ---PAGE BREAK--- VOLUME 2A AND 2B ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLANt THE ANAHEIM RESORT IDENTITY PROGRAM UNDER SEPARATE COVER 01949 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e APPENDIX C TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ---PAGE BREAK--- e ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN CIRClIDATION STUDY MAYl994 UI fJUITAIIDClATn AM ---PAGE BREAK--- 11 Draft ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN CIRCULATION STUDY Prepared for City 01ADaheIm Prepared by A Fout AssocIIIteI IDe 2020 North Tustin A ue Santa Ana California 92701 [PHONE REDACTED] May ZS 1994 e ---PAGE BREAK--- CONTENTS Palle L INTRODUCTION Project Area It Analysis Scope I t Performance Criteria 1 3 De6nitions 1 5 Referenc ca 1 5 u PROmCf DESCRIPTION Propolled Land Use Plan n t Trip Generation Methodology n 6 Trip Generation timata n tO Project Trip Distnbution n t llL PROJECr SE ITlNG e EDting Setting m t Planned Cin ulation Improvements m 3 2000 NoProject TrafIic Conditions m tO 2OtO NoProject TrafIic Conditiona m tS IV PROJECr IMPACf ANALYSIS 2000 Project Impactl IV t 2000 CMP System Impactl IV 3 2fll0 Project Impacts IV A1tem atiwaAnaIyIia IV t3 V MIT1GATION MEASURES e CNcnicw V t Short Range Mitigation Meaura V 2 Long Range Mitigation Meaura V 3 01953 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e UST OF FIGURES Pave 1 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Location 1 2 n 1 ARA Specific Plan Areas n 2 n 2 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Planning Areas n 3 ill 1 Existing 1991 ADT Volumes ill 2 ill 2 Existing Intersection Location Map ill 4 ill 3 Existing Lane Configurations ill6 ill 4 2000 ADT Volumes No Project ill 13 ill S 2000 Committed Lane ConfiguratioDJ ill IS ill 6 2010 ADT Volumes No Project ill 19 ill 7 2010 Lane ConfiguratioDJ ill 21 ill8 2010 Non Committed Background Lane ConfiguratioDJ ill 23 IV 1 2000 ADTVolumes With rUlt Stage of Project IV4 IV 2 2010 ADT Volumes With Project IV 7 IV 3 2010 AM Peak Hour ICU Shares IV ll IV4 2010 PM Peak Hour ICU Shares IV 12 IV S 2010 ADT Volumes A1tcmatiYc A IV IS IV6 2010 ADT Volumes A1tcmatiYc B IV 16 IV 7 2010 ADT Volumes A1tcmatiYc C IV 17 IV8 2010 Lane ConfiguratioDJ A1tcmatMi A through C IV IS IV 9 2010 ADT Volumes A1tcmatiYc D IV 23 ii ---PAGE BREAK--- LIST OF TABLES Page I I Standards For Roadway Levels of Service 1 0 II I Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Land Use Summary II 4 II 2 Disneyland Resort and Hotel Circle Land Use Summary II II 3 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Trip Generation Summary II ll m l Existing lCU Summary m s m 2 Committed Circulation System m m 3 Related Projects in the Anaheim Resort VICinity m ll m 4 2000 lCU Summary NoProject m 14 ms 2000 Non Committed Background Intersection Improvements m l moO 2010 lCU Summary NoProject m 2O m 2010 Non Committed Background Intersection Improvements m 22 m 8 2010 lCU Summary NoProject plus Non Committed Improvements m 24 IV I Anaheim Resort SpeciIic Plan Year 2000 ProjecII IV 2 IV 2 2000 lCU Summary FIlIt Stage of Project IV S IV 3 2010 lCU Summary With Project IV8 IV4 2010 lCU Summary Alternatives A through C IV 19 IV S 2010 lCU Summary Alternative D IV 24 V I Long Range Mitigation Mcasura V S iii 01955 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e I INTRODUCTION This report theresults ofa circulation analysis performed for theAnaheim Resort Specific Plan hereafter referred to as the Anaheim Resort or the project areaIt addressa the traffic impacts which are related to the dewlopment plan proposed for the Anaheim Resort and is intended to provide the level of circulation analysis required for environmental clearance of such a development plan The report contains documentation of the methodology and assumptions used in the analysis and presents the results and findings of the capacity impacts of the proposed development plan PROJECf AREA Figure 1 1 illustratca the location of the Anaheim ResorL It encompasses 5495 acres IIlOlIt of which is located weat of the Santa ADa Freeway 1 5 betwceD Ball Road and Orangewood Avcnue and includca the Anaheim Comention Center A detailed dacription ofthe land IICI and trip generating characteristics of dewlopment plana proposed for the Anaheim Resort is given in Chapter n ANALYSIS SCOPE The purpolCofthis ana1yIia is to ideatify the traffic implicatioDa ISIIOCiated with the n m Resort and to recommead mitiption that could prOYide adequate levcII ofICIVice on the sunoundiDg circulation system Traffic impacll of the proposed dew 1opment plan wen ideatified by analyt ingabort range and long range traffic CODditio The analJaia mi average daily traffic ADT on the IIInOIllldinI circulation system as wel1 as the peak hour 1evcl ofICIVice impactl at critical intenectioua For the short range year 20 0 analyIia impacll due to partial completion of the proposed dewlopment plan are omi based on abort range growth projcctio for e Raaot SpdIc Cn lIlIIa sc I I F i 355CIlllAs ---PAGE BREAK--- z e l Q SSY1noa U 1 r U J Sl fNns I fz m2 II U gg r II r moo m e san IS O f I e Ii i l 0 HlI si l CI tI z o e c 0 r ft r l 1111I11 0 CI CI l cc8 S c e Q I AAaIIeim SpedlIc PIa 1 2 J1 lee e CiraJIoaa 51udy ---PAGE BREAK--- e surrounding the Anaheim Resort while traffic conditions corresponding to full development of the proposed plan and buildout of the surrounding area are used to evaluate long range 2010 traffic impacts Long range impacts due to a number of land use and circulation alternatives being considered in the project area are also analyzed Future traffic forecasts for use in thestudy wereproduced using the AnaheimTraffic Analysis Model ATAM a computerized traffic forecasting model that was recently developed for use in a citywide analyses see Reference 1 at the end of this chapter for a description of the model Consistent with the format used for eDYironmentaI impact reports the traffic analysis material presented here is set out as foUows Chapter n Project Description Chapter ill Circulation Setting Chapter IV Project Impacta Chapter V Mitigation Measures The detailed analysis results contained in the technical appendices at the end of the report are referenced in the tezt where appropriate PERFORMANCE CRlTERIA Evaluating the abilityof the circulation IJllem to serve the deaired future land UICI requires establiahing suitable perfOI lll8llCl criteria 1beIe are the meaJII by which future traffic are compared to future circulation IJltem capacity and the ldequacy ofthat circulation IJllem ed The circulation IJllem evaluation made in this report is bued on peak hour data Capacity needs tend to be IIIllIt important at intencctionl and the use ofpeak hour data enablea intencctioD capacity to be cIetermiDcd The detailed fora aating capability oftheATAM aI1owIlong ranae peak hour data on the circulation IJllem to be Co ted with a l hle level of aa urxy Forecaall are made at an intencction level with individual intencction turn lDO aIICl1l1 being estimated Baed on thcIe turn lDO aIICl1t intenec tioncapacity utilization lCUvalua are Spec iIIo CraIIoIm SllId 1 3 F A Iac J55GOZ a ---PAGE BREAK--- estimated for the AM and PM peak hours The lCUs represent volume t H 8pacity ratios for the forecast volumes and the assumed intersection lane configurations The performance criteria used in this study for evaluating volumes and capacities on the street and highway system is summarized as follows Level of Service LOS to be based on peak hour Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU values calculated using the following assumptions 50 Flow Rare 17011 V Per Hour VPH lJ501u1CU Levels of Service are as follows UveI Service LOS A LOSB LOSe LOS 0 LOSE u ICU Value HJ 10 ao so 1 00 A4 this SIl1Dl118lindicates a IevcI of service LOS scale is used to evaluate intencction performance based on lCUvalua The levels range from A toP with LOS A representing free Oow conditions and LOS Prepresenting traffic congeation Various operating LOS stal1dards have been establisbed which sene both a guideline for evaluating observed traffic conditiollS and as a target or goal when evaluating future development plans and c in ulation system modifications Atthe regional plonn 1 glevel the statewideCongeation MallagemeDt Program CMP peeifW LOS E peak hour lCU value Ic A thau or equal to 1 10 the operating staDdard for roadways and intenectiollS 00 the CMP higbway system At the County and Iocallevel the Qty ofAoabeim and the Orange County Growth Management Program GMP me established LOS 0 lCU value Ic A than or equal to 90 the Iowat lICl eptable IevcI of service for peak hour intencctioo volumes SpedIk Sllody lie 355OllZ a 14 01959 e ---PAGE BREAK--- DEFINITIONS e Certain terms used throughout this report are defined belowto clarify their intended meaning AnT Average Daily Traffic DU Dwelling Unit lCU Intersection Capacity Utilization A factor used to measure the volume to capacity ratio for an intenc ction and determine the level of service LOS Level ofService A scale used to evaluate circulation system performance based on intenection lCU valua or volumecapacity ratioll of arteria1 segments The levels which range from A to F are descnbed in Table 1 1 Peak Hour This refers to the hour during the AM peak period typically 7 AM 9 AM or the PM peak period typically 3 PM 6PM in which the greatest number ofvehicle trips are generated by a given land use or are travelling on a given roadway TSF Square Feet V C Volume to Capacity Ratio This is typically descnbed u a pen entage of capacity utilized by existing or projected traffic on a segment of arteria1 or an intersection turn movement VPD Vehicles Per Day VPH Vehic1ea Per Hour REFERENCES 1 Anaheim General Plan Traffic AnaiyIiI Traffic Model Dacriptioo Austin Fault Aaocialel Inc August 1992 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report for the DiIDcyIand Rsort Michael Brandman leI December 1992 3 Malter Plan of Arterial Higbwaya County of Orange Environmental Management Ageucy Tramportation pl nnin August 1989 4 Highway Capacity Manual Highway Reaean hBoard Special Report ftT National ARmy of Sciencea Washington D c 1965 It sPlIa CIn oIola S udJ AIIIdII IK 3S5OO2 aI ---PAGE BREAK--- lEVEL OF SERVICE A B e o E F T bIe 1 1 STANDARDS FOR ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE TRAme CONDmONS PriIIIuiIy lee 1 1IIUIUy 90 I ol lee opeed VebicIeI CaD IIWteUYa IIIlimpeded witbia the trat6c atreuL DeIly at p Ii7M it IIIiDimoL Re laobly pedod 1 1IIUIUy bcMlI70 ol lee opeed AbIJlty to oliptIy otoppaI oulljecI d to bIe bIe iD Ioca 1IIlI be l aaprq IipaI lIIlIc oatributeto ol 5O ol opeed d pprecioble oa naaeiD iD 1IIlI tlII iD pproocIIdeIay iD IIICriIJ opeed Co naae 1ipaI iaopprapriIle IipalIiIDiDI bip IX1IIl llllIIIbiaatioa FIX pIIIIIIiDc tIUI LewI ol Ibe 1owaI1bat bIe Awnp UIMlI In abouI to pc rceal 01fn eaaw apeed CIIancIeriJied IIoIplIlcut approocII dOIaya ol ol opeod IX ca II bip 1ipaI queuiqll criIlca1 iD 1ipaI IX CIIancIeriJied IIIIICriIJ II to 1 ollroe opeed r UUIy 1 criIlca1 reouItlDa iD bip pproocII dOIaya Advene proptlIIioa it freqaeadJ cc IribaIar10 IbiI C FRlmIllCrilJ oll985 Copodty SjleaIIc CiraIIIIioa Study 14 I f IDe 01961 ---PAGE BREAK--- e I 5 Traffic Manual Slate of California Department ofTransportation 1985 6 Trip Generation 5th Edition Institute ofTransportation Engineers 1991 7 CongestionManagement Program for Orange County Orange Authority January 1991 s CIIaIlodaa SbIdJ 1 7 F IK 3S5OlIZ co e ---PAGE BREAK--- II PROJECT DESCRIPTION This chapter descnbes the land use and trip generation c baracteristics associated with the development plans which are proposed for the Anaheim Resort The proposed land use plans are summarized first fol1owed by a disc usaion of the trip generation metbodology utilized for the traffic impact analysis ofthe project Existing and future trip generation summariea for theAnaheim Reaort are then presented and the methodology for distributing project generated trips onto the roadway system in and around the project area is diacuaaed at the end ofthe chapter PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN The Anaheim Reaort Specific Plan is 1cxated within the An MIll Resort Area ARA a portion of the City of Anaheim designated by the Citys General Plan for recreation and touristcollYention activities along with related IIeI In IIddition to the An MIlI Resort the ARA encompasses the adopted 489 7 lICre Disneyland Resort and the proposed 6 8 lICre Hotel Circle Specific Plan These two specific plana are described in greater detai1later in this section and the boundaries ofeach of the three specific plan areas within the ARA are i11l11trated in Figure n l e e 1be An im Resort is divided into 26 pl nni111 areas i11l11trated in FIgIIJe II 2 1be proposed deYelopment plan primarily iIMIha newc onatruction or i1 t lWOOn ofresort hotel use at varialll densities Lehotc1 rooms per lICre within each planning area Table n lsl111111Wiza the c xiating and proposed land IIIeI for each pl nn 1 area together with land use totals for the entire project area AI the table indicalel approzimatcly 17 000 IIdditional resort hotel rooms are proposed to be developed and are umed to bec onatructcd either in plal eofc xiating land IIIeI hotel SII lIiI SlIlllJ U1r F IIIe 35 0 1 01963 ---PAGE BREAK--- e os LEGEND Anaheim Re ort Are ARA Boundary EZ3 Anaheim Re ort SpecUic Plan CJ Adopted Disneyland R ort Specific Ficure 11 1 Plan D ARA SPECIF1C PLAN AREAS Propo d Hotel Circle Specific Plan RaM SpodIIc PIaa CimlIabolISludy 4 1 IDe u z 35SOOZo ---PAGE BREAK--- I i rS LEGEND Anaheim Resort Area AHA Boundary r lAnaheim Re ort Specific PI n Plannina Are XX Are Number FIcure U 2 ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREAS SpeciIIc PIu 0n ulaIi00 Sludy I lee 355OO1a n 01965 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Table II I ANAHEIM R1 SORT SPEClF1C PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY Propoocd AKA PlIaaiDJ AppoIimare H ea iIy An lI Aaea edatinl Land UIeI P nd U fROOIDIIAac 9Jl 612 Raorl H 7 l5 Raorlllo d 75 17 1 TSF CommatiaI 2 101 445 Raorlllo d 1 275 Raorlllold 125 5 TSF CommatiaI 3 467 624 4 TSF C CaI 6244 TSF CGaoca CaI 35 0 TSF Ccl6 tiQo CeDI I8CiIIary dc1 1 1 fDl 41 4 30 9 2 341 Raorl Hold Raorl Hold 125 1 TSF CommatiaI 5 30 4 1 533 Raorl Hold 3 800 Raorlllo d 125 29TSF C iaI 6 3 5 229 Raorl Hold 263 Raorl Hold 75 7 56 3 V 4 223 Raorl HoleI 75 8 91 m Raorl Hold 690 Raorlllolcl 75 81TSF CommatiaI 9 27 112 Raorl Hold m Raorl Hold 75 1l 3 TSF 1 daI 10 379 216 Raorl Hold l I43 Raorl Hold 75 16 1 TSF tiaI 11 TSF mDU NalliIe 11 14 8 4TSF C 340 Raorl Hold lOll 12 3 5 76 TSF C tiaI 350 Raorl Hold lOll 18 0 TSFI 13 11 1 422 Rooart Hold 1 110 Rooart Hold lOll 151 TSF 14 1 6ITSF C tiaI 1 0 Rooart Hold lOll 15 11 1 611 Rooart Hold 833 Rooart Hold 75 4 3TSF C tiaI 16 16 1 9lO Rooart Hold 1 223 Rooart Hold 75 2 z J TSF C II 17 111 IQ5 9TSF 990 Raorl Hold 75 CooliIIlIllll Spol lIIoPlu Cn uIWoe Sbody D A r A 0 IK 35SCmAs ---PAGE BREAK--- Table II I XlII ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFlC Pu N USE SUMMARY AKA PIa uIinc Appmtimale Area Aaa ill I fttI U 18 132 6n RCIGII1loIeI 21 81llF Commada1 221llF otIIce 19 444 318 RCIGII1loIeI 60 TSF Commada1 20 4 8 260 RCIGII HcIeI 21 33 3 236 RCIGII1loIeI JO7TSF 1I5 31llF otIIce 198 DU Mabile 22 19 7 764 Reoon IloIeI 611llF 57 9 TSF otIIce 23 31 136 Reoon IloIeI U TSF 0 I 24 9 29 Reoon IloIeI 23 8 4 254 Reoon IloIeI 118 TSF r daJ 26 3 TSF crotIIce 16 6 0 Sl17 Reoon IloIeI TOTAL 388 2 11 190 RCIGII1loIeI 6244 TSF o L Caler 206 6 TSFr w 1754 TSF 0III0e 142 ITSFo 26 3 0III0e 47 1 DUMabile TSF SqF DU 0Uoll 1 ntlU P Rcaan HoIeI Dealily lRoomaIA re1 75 990 RCIGII HoIeI 330 RCIGII HoIeI 75 360 Reoon HoIeI 75 1 665 Reoon HcIeI so 1J 8 ReoonHclel SO 57 9 TSF otIIce ISS RCIGII1loIeI SO 45 RCIGII1loIeI SO 42lI Ra IlloIeI 26 3 crotIIce SO Sl17 Reoon IloIeI 2lI18 RCIGII1loIeI TSF eoa Ceoler 57 TSF 0III0e 26 3 TSF p0It 0III0e 84 S 1 Forlrip IIIe c c II 20 for dY 01 Ill Iripa to be tip diea CaIa 2 0I 0I 01 SIreI ICaIeIa 10 t v 1M 01 0 L W tn MInar 9J I 10 su 01 01 oIo IIIIZf W 1IIe1 5 0 of 1IIe 1 5 wIdooloI Daolly IIIe r lller Rcaan 5pot IIIc S 1IdJ n 5 JI I F 1IIc 35 02 01967 ---PAGE BREAK--- e residential and non residential or on vacant parcels of land The proposed plan modeled for traffic also includes 3S8 OOO square feet of future convention center developmenl The development plans for the adopted Disneyland Resort and proposed Hotel CircleSpecific Plan areas are summarized in Table 11 2 The 4897 acre Disneyland Resort development plan involves construction of the 3 50 000 square foot Westcot theme park a 900 000 square foot expansion to theexisting Disneyland theme park construction ofa 475 000square foot administration building and SOO OOO square feet ofretaiVrestaurantlconvention space a 4600 room expansion to the hotel district west of West Street and expansion to 2415 hotel roollll east of Harbor Boulevard Two parking structures will be constructed one adjacent to West Street lOuth of Ball Road and the other adjacent to Clementine Street between KateUa Avenue and Freedman Way A parking area is also planned to be located south of KateUa Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street and will include surfacc parking and a parking structure The proposed Hotel Circle Spccilic Plan encompasses 6 8acres and proposes the development of 1 103 hotel roomswithin two existing hotels and three new hotels Traffic generation estimates associated with the development plans proposed for each ofthese spccilic plan areas are summarized later in this chapter TRIP GENERATION METHODOLOGY mentioned in Chapter L the traffic impacts related to the Anaheim Resort wen determined based on an analysis ofADT roadway and peat bour interscc tion turn for the circulation system in and around the projcctarea Vehicle tripgeneration estimates therefore needed to be prepared for the three spccilic plan arcas within the ARA as U as for other development in the vicinity ofthe ARA The tecbnical means for producing vehiclc trip generation estimates for existing and future land IISCI in the Cty of Anaheim and the surrounding region baa been established in the Ctys traffic model Traffic IIIOdcI trip aeneration rates for various types of land IISCI have been defined and trip generation estimates arccalculated by applying the trip rates to quantities ofexisting or future land uses Aaa Sped6c Plu 0ra IaIa Sludy u 1IIc 35 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table U 2 DISNIYU NDRESORT AND HO Il LC1RCU1 ND USE SUMMARY Theme Port ADOPTED DISNEYlAND IUlSORT SPI CIPIC PIAII liooBIIiIlIIq R c Meolia Rooal C llrIeIllioo S Pan iq SIl1ICllIRI Parldq DIolricc PROPOSllD 8OI ELCIIlCLE SPI CIPIC PL H I iIIiac DiIaeyIaDd PIaaaed DiIaeyIaDd W T Wal DloIricl Wal DloIricl Eaol DloIricl T w SInIcloIe I aIt SInIcloIe T 2 600000 oq feet 900000 oq feet 3 50000 oq feet 6 8SO OOO oq feet 7 000 quare fed 1 000 I OCIIIII 4 600 I OCIIIII 2415 8015 3OO llOO oq feet 2llO llOO oq feet A MO 16lOO Arr 17 600 5 000 269 834 1 103 Sf PIaa SlIlllJ o p a C Alt l 0 7 01969 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Due to the unique character ofthe overall land plan being proposed for the Anaheim Resort special considerations have been made in the traffic model regarding the trip generation and trip distnbution characteristics of certain land uses within the project area Also for the PUl of this study it bas been assumed that aregionwide increase in work trip average vehicle ridership AVR will beachieved in the future due to adopted transportation demand management 1DM regulations The levels of future work trip reduction and the procedures for incorporating the reduction into the citywide traffic model are discussed in the next section The sections that foUow discuss the derivation oftrip rates and trip generation estimates for land uses proposed within the project area TDM Work Trip ReductlODS In order to account for anticipated increased compliance with traffic management regulations that are currently in effect eg the South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulation 15 it has been assumed that an amount ofwork trip reduction will be obse OYer the next 10 to 20 years The amount of future reduction assumed for this study is related to the anticipated regionwide increase in work trip AVR and is consistent with the reductions assumed in The Disneyland sort FElR No 311 The 2000 and 2010 work trip reductions as derived in the traffic studyportion of that FEIR are summarized as foUows Year 2000 Ysr 2010 WeftTripAVR IIric l lOmM l Weft Trip AVR 1riIII 10 mM l Weft Trip V Redoaiae due 10 AVR cllaFl 1 17 1 0 16 1 35 l4Ji this summary indicates achieYemeot of a 1 50 target AVR by 2010 would represent a reduction in work tripsor around 22 pen enl and achievement of a 135 AVR by 2000 would represent a reduction or 14 percenL These reductions are applied in the citywide traffic model by reducing the work trip generation rates for the various model land use categoriel by these percentages refer to Appendix A for a listing of the traffic model work trip generation factors Traffic model trip generation summaries with and without the work trip reductions indicate that SpodIIc PIoo ClraIIolioa SllIdy AMIIia FoaII Il lac WOO1a 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- areawide AM and PM peak hour trips are reduced 8 percent and 5 percent respectively by the year 2000 and 13 percent and 8 percent respectively by year 2010 Resort Hotel Trip GeaenUoD Rata The AM and PM peak hour traffic model trip rates for resort hotels represent ITE resort hotel rates reduced by 10 percent assuming an average occupancy of 90 percent and reduced a further 15 percent to account for a higher than average non vehicular travel mode for trips generated by resort hotels within the project area A daily trip generation rate for resort hotels in the project area was developed in a simi1ar manner for application in 1 M Disneyland son FEIR and for consistency has been assumed for this study The resulting peak hour and ADT resort hotel trip rates are summarized in the foUewing table together with year 2000 and year 2010 trip rates which include the future work trip reductions discussed previously e AM PI AIt HOUR PM PI AItHOUR IN Ol1f TOTAL IN Ol1f TOTAL MYr Rcoan HoIeI RaI O ao lripndUCSioa 13 13 J6 17 19 36 54 2000 Raon HoIeI RaI O 14 Irip ndUCSioa IZ 1Z Z4 17 19 36 537 e 2010 Rcoan HoIeI Rata lrip 11 11 zz 16 18 34 5 3Z eoter Hotel Trip Gneradoa Future botel dewiopment in thec otioo area An Jv lm Rerort rl nni g areaa 2 5 is propelled to be dcveIoped at an intensity of 125 rooatI F acre Rccopizing that a sil ifi o luttly higher tbaD averaae proportioo of IIOD vehicular trips will be geuerated by botel within this area in comparisonwith other resort boteI in the An iJn ReIort the number of Conwotion area botellOODll aaumed in the traffic JDDCIeI are artificially reduced for trip genention purpoaea The approadl imoha uswning an intensity of 100 IOODIIFacre rather tbaD the propl d 125 equating to a 20 percent reduction in the number of botel mol1lS Illumed in the SpmIIc PIoa 0n lIl0 aSIadl JT F A IK 1 u 01971 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Convention Center area The resort botel trip rates described in the previous section are then applied to detennine trip generation estimates for Convention Center area botel use Disneyland Resort Trip Generation The trip generation approacb that bas been establisbed in tbe citywide traffic model involves tbe application of specially derived trip rates for the theme parkadministration and resort botel components of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and standard commercial traffic model rates for tbe retailrestaurantconvention componenl Guest and cast service theme park trip rates were derived based on trip generation estbnates from The Resort FEIR and trip rates for resort botel development were derived as discussed earlier in this cbapter In order to produce retailrestaurant trip generation levels that are consistent with thOle estimated in The Resort FEIR tbe actual quantity of retai1land use was artificially adjusted before applying the traffic models commercial trip generation rates refer to Appendix A for listings of all trip rates that are applied in the citywide traffic model TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Trip generation estimates were prepared for the Anaheim Resort based on the existing and proposed land uses presented at the beginning of this chapter and the resultJ are summaril in Table D 3 For analysis PurpolCS these estimates haw been produced using trip generation rates whicb include the 22 percent level ofwork trip reduction that is anticipated by the year 2010 As the table indicates the proposed Anaheim Resort plan is estimated to generate around 161 500 ADT an increase of 71 percent aver the trip generation estimate based on eltisting land uses The corresponding AM and PM peak hour trip generation estimates of 7 016 and 10 623 represent increases of83 percent and 56 pen ent aver the estimates that are based on existing land usa The trip generation estimates based on emting land uses will as the baais for determining long range background traffic forecastJ without development of the proposed Anaheim Resort land plan c asentially repraenting a noproject letting A traffic forecast letting that includes development of the proposed land plan will then be utilized to identify the project impact on the surrounding roadway system SpocilIc PIu Cin uIa1ioa SIllily 0 10 fOUII A lac ---PAGE BREAK--- T ble 11 3 ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PlAN lRlP GENERATION SUMMARy AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR u ND USE UNITS IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL ACT EXISTING lAND USES NOoPROJIIICI Hotel 1 190 1 231 1 231 2 1 790 2014 3 MI 59 291 CocM aIioD Cater 624 4 TSF 612 25 637 31 199 830 11 701 Commcn iaI 206 6 TSF 47 rI 74 663 663 1 326 15 0llIc0 1754 TSF m 36 30 1 57 m 330 2 566 lDdualrial 1421 TSF 57 9 66 1 1 62 949 POll 0llIc0 26 3 TSF 2 36 108 In [PHONE REDACTED] MoIIiIe Home 473 DU 47 132 179 137 zz z 2171 Talal 2 319 1 516 3 83S 2 111 4 llOZ 6 813 94 PROPOSED lAND PLUI Hotel 28168 Rocma 29Ol 2 902 JlI4 4 m 4748 8969 140 018 eoa lioa CaI 624 4 TSF 612 25 637 31 199 830 11 701 eoa lioa CaI aaciIIary 358JI TSF 351 14 36l 18 476 6709 0llIc0 579 TSF 90 12 102 19 90 109 lI26 POll 0IlIce 26 3 TSF 52 36 108 In 17 239 2197 Talal 41J11 3 009 7 1ll6 4411 6 212 Il1 6ZJ 161 511 be TSF I UMad Sq Feel DU 0MiIIiq Un I Trip lIlIlilIIaIca booed oa AaabeIm Tn lkAaaIyIlI ATAM 1rip 1ha1 n nllipmM ar 10 j Rd 1o aadAppoDdlaAfar 1rip Ia 10 lor A L 1rtpo apecred 10 be by ill IIlo CcaI rIIlo oI IoIlloc CcaIer by priar to caladlCiq trip l sPIooo SbodJ F 1 35 OO 2 a 11 11 01973 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Special considerations regarding the distnbution ofvehicle traffic generated by guests of the Disneyland Resort theme park are applied in the traffic model Consistent with assumptions made in The Disneyland Resort FEIR the foUowing distnbution pattern for theme park trips have been assumed 32 percent Within the local area in and around the Anaheim Resort attnbuted to Disneyland Resort and Anaheim Resort hotel development and other locai development 68 percent Distnbuted beyond the Anaheim Resort locai area including 23 percent northwest of the area on S and 20 percent southeast of the area on IS and SR 22 Rolon SpodIIc Ploa ClmdaIIa Sl1Idy D U F 4 IDe 35 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- Peak hour and ADT trip generation estimates for the Disneyland Resort and Hotel Circle Specific Plans are summarized as follows e AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR lAND USE IDIITS IN our TOTAL IN our TOTAL ADT ADOPI ED DISI lEYIAND RESORT SPECIFIC PlAN Theme PwtIAdlIIiII 70m TSF 1 513 m 2 Sl 1 055 1 281 2 336 47J53 Raan IloIcl 8 015 882 882 1 764 1 28Z 1 443 2725 42 640 R unJIVCoav 500 TSF zs 16 44 42Z 42Z 844 9 18 T 2433 1 635 4068 2159 3146 5 90S 100 191 PROPOSED HOTEL CIRCLE SPECIFIC PlAN Raan IloIcl 1 103 121 121 m 176 199 375 5 868 These estimates were developed hased on the trip rate derivation and Disneyland Resort generation estimation procedures diacusaed earIier in this c hapter and they include the measure of work trip reduction that is anticipated by the year 2010 due to adopted transportation management regulations The year 2010 background trat1ic forecasts noproject alternative that are diacusaed in Otapter ill assume completion of these two specific plan developments e PROJECI TRIP DISTRIBUTION As mentioned in the previa c hapter the traffic impacts due to the propoeed ADaheim Resort development plan wereanaIyzed in this study based on both a short range year 2000 and a long range year 2010 time frame and use made of the 2000 and 2010 11J of the Anaheim Trat1ic Analysis Model ATAM to prodl1I c traffic forecasts based on these two settings This model allows project specific generated trill to be distributed over a cumulative land use and circulation setlinJ which for the IonS range represents buildout of County and City General Plans Since the ATAM is a suban aderiYation ofthe Orange Analysis Mode1 OCTAM D and is therefore desiJDed to provide a forecasting c apability that is directly compauble with OCTAM n use of the ATAM in a study such as this is coutent with the forecasting requirements of the Consestion Management Plan CMP Raan SI 6PIa Sludy 0 12 F 1 IIac e ---PAGE BREAK--- e III PROJECT SETTING This chapter delcribca the loca1 traDsportation setting for the p1 OpOlCd Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The existing roadway system and present day traffic are first foUowed by a discussion of the ful1lrll circulation system improllClIICI1ts which are committed to he implemented in and around the project area Year 2000 and 2010 traffic forecasts for COnditiolll without any future development of the n im Resort are then together with discussions regarding the typca of non tted improllClIICI1ts which are needed to address projected short range and long range dclicicncics based on noprojcct traffic conditions EXISTING SE1TING The existingroadway system in the vicinity ofthe Anaheim Resort is iIIU1trated in Figure m 1 together with existing 1991 obIcned ADT volumes The project area is served regionally by the Santa Ana Freeway IS and Ioca11y by established DOrtb uth and cast arterial thoroughfares SOIDC ofwhich carry moderate1y heavy JOI Ball Road KateUa AWllue Clapman Avenue Euclid Street West Street Harbor Boulevard and Haster n m Bou1cwrd and SOIDC of which carry relatM ly Ji ht daily traffic voIuma Ccrritm AWllue Orangewood AWllue Ninth Street and Walnut Street In order to deterntinc Ioperating CODditioas 011 the circulation system atlng 1991 AM and PM peak hour oIlIcrwxI intalCCtioa turD JOI were obtained for key the area FftotilintalCCtioa cap8City utilization ICU vall1C1 were cak ulated using these pcaIr hour counts in CDIIIbinatioa with the JCOIDClIic IaDc coafiguration of each location A discussed in Clap I va1ue of 1 00 LOS Ej is the maimum ICUvalue by the Congestion Manqcment Program CMP for intalCCtioa 1ocationI on the CMP network and e SpodIIo Cn uIIld SbIdJ m 1 Irf I 3S OlIZ aI ---PAGE BREAK--- li6 O IS0 y r J r Z w w Ii o 0 X 25 26 27 26 26 DJCLO IS Ie LOMA E 6 8 l 11M ID 91 8 14 14 13 17 15 13 2 Iii I iS 35 32 Il i 46 50 47 I I m q 2 22 19 is I HASTER 0 7 7 5 iiiiS lftS 2 B VSt tzI 0 Ia 0 Z 0 Cl 29 22 21 21 21 26 STAlE CCll EGE J c9 C v tl ri eJ 3 10 15 o I 1 f iJNl IST t 9 11 ii 1 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- r e additionally the City of Anaheim uses a value of 90 LOS 0as the maximum acceptable lCU value for intersections within its city limiL Figure ill 2 illustrates the existing intersection locations that were studied in and around the Anaheim Resort and Table ill I summarizes the corresponding peak hour lCU values Actual intersection turn volumes and lCU calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B and an illustration of the existing geometric lane configuration at each location is provided in Figure ill3 AI the lCU summary table indicates each of the six CMP intersection locations studied operates within the CMPLOS E standard and the City s LOS 0 standard Of the remaining locations only the following two currently operate worse than the City s LOS 0 performance standard LOCATION PRAX HOUR LOS 3 WalDut A BaD 26 AIlaheim A Boll PM PM E E PLANNED CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS In this analysis traffic impacts due to the Anaheim Resort are identified based on both a short range year 2000 and long range year 2010 transportation letting The fintstep is to deliDc the circulation system that is planned to be in place for each letting Table m 2 providca a summary of circulation improvements that are assumed to be in place by 2000 and 2010 witb or without future development of the Anaheim Resort The sbort range 2000 improvement projects are primarily associated with the planned I S Freeway widening project a project that is expected to sipifU ntly future trftel in and around the n hMm Resort The project is divided into live legments from the Garden Grove Freeway to Beacb Boulevard and construction is scheduled to begin in 1997 Construction of Segments A and B SR 22 to Lincoln Avenue wbic bextend through the analysis area of this study bave been funded and will proceed finL For the purpose of this study it is assumed that these segments will be completed by 2000 Important I S widening improvements in the vicinity of the e SpodIk P1u ClraIIolioa SIudJ ml IDe 35 Ol12o ---PAGE BREAK--- 6L6 O It llOSA pllS lIDIOJlWD J J tom oowllOds i IlCU Ia go tf co lOST Cl Ql 2 IiI 2l l I I l I I HASii Ie LEMS co lisCJl z C Z 1I SrATE co COlJEGE eJ Ql lll 0 I S1JNKIST t III r 0n co DouGlASS Ql eJis e z II l ---PAGE BREAK--- Table W 1 EXISTING ICU SUMMARY IN1 ERSecnoN AM PM l Eudid BaD 66 J O 2 Eudid Kaldla 65 Jl5 3 WalDut BaD 73 92 4 Walaut Cenid 38 43 WalDUI Kaldla 58 62 6 W BaD 57 S4 7 W acnJt BaD 52 62 8 W CaTitoo 28 44 9 W KaIdIa 59 62 lO W C 29 29 11 W Oraqewood 41 62 12 Ball 6S 76 13 1 NB Ram 64 14 I 58 Ram 43 S4 u Harbcx a L 47 53 16 1 41 17 Kaldlal 52 66 IS CDlMIItioa 29 S4 19 Oraqewood 46 60 lO Clla Sf Jl5 21 CleIIIcaIlae 32 22 CleIIIcaIlae KaIdIa 52 25 1 58 RampI 1 34 52 l6 BaD 72 99 r7 CaTitoo 46 73 29 1 47 63 30 A KatdIa 73 Jf 32 fIIMer at Oi 4 49 6S 34 1 NB RampI Ka 49 77 35 UwIo 39 41 36 Cdlep so 60 fl SK 57 58 RampI 46 45 3 SK 57 NIl RampI Kaldlal M 43 e 1 J u CMP D I GO ADA 61 n Me II 900 9l 1JJOB UlOI 1 CIIJ PM Zla8dZZ rn rile 0 a c FEIR 1 L SpodIIl PIIIII ClraIIa1iaoISludl m 5 IIM 35SOll24 e ---PAGE BREAK--- m J J ttr EUCUD m tt T LOARA H g l HARBOR te Ul T x 9 z Jtt tt 4 tj Itt 4ft WALNUT t tt I lI lII J ict tt Wt lIl j 1 0 ic t r 8 1 1 m lI j lII i r 0 fTl z 4 t HASTER E ttr m CD rr ns lS 3 LEWIS Z J cI STATE COLEGE x0 rr 0 Z SUNKIST 00 r llS DOUGLAS I JJ j c rn 1 l J Ul J rj J It v 0 0 11 T 0 0 I o l J 1rC l t o l c m I MXVieJ ZC1 M oo J C1 c u jo n F E UlI iI fa5 ofaJ JI 5 Q p o 0 CO ---PAGE BREAK--- e Table 11I 2 ClRcuunON SYSI1 MIMPROVEMENTS LOCAnON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS SaD ADa Freeway 1 5 lrom the Oardea 0 Freeway SRon 10 UD XlID Ave 0 Autry W lrom SanADa Pwy 1 5 10 U Dna Ave Well St at BaD Rd CerriIOl Ave betweat Walaul Sl aDd Weal 51 IIaaler 51 10 S Ie CoIIqe IIMI M Ddaetler Ave from ICatella Ave 10 CamplOll Ave SHORT RANOE IMPLEMENIEO BY YEAR 20 0 Freeway projecllo add D1u1U uaveI aDd HOY lnIIIitway po aDd 10 roc c lIlIpre aru riaI iD CoaoInIcl 6 IaDe aru riaI mcIudo1 trim SuIa Au Freett8J HOY lnIIIitway 1 CoaoInIcl6 IaDe aru riaI lbe SanADa F 1 5 1o 1IllIIh 1 Coaven 10 0De4l8 IOUtbbouDd 1 4 WalDa Ccnilca COMMIT EDINTEIISIICI ION IMPROVEMENTII 7 Weal BaD 8 Weal Ccnilca 9 W 12 BaD 13 1 5NB Add NBJI I Modify for 1 5 NB aaun add 3cd SBTud 3cd NBT ad SBL ud NBJI LONO RANOE IMPLEMENI1 OBY YEAR 2010 Realip coaliaUOUl DOIthIaoutb aner u1 1rteri I1 RI ealeiolialaleClJoa put at CcnIIoo Ave IIllItIIa1J AlIp 1ripIo EST dual saT dual WBT dull NBT dual SBL dual WBL dual IlBl duall 11L waR NBRad ERR EIaIiDIIIe lea d NlIlJ3nI NBT 10 NBL Add SBR ad WBR CGedauod SpociIIcPIu Cin ulaID 51udJ 11I 7 A 1Dc 35SOO2 c1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 1Il 2 COIl CIRCUlATION SYS reM IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION SHORT RANGE lMPU MENTED BY YEAR 2000 COMM11Tl DINTI IMPROVEMENTS 1 14 IIart or 4 1 5 SB Ramp Modify lo 1 5 SB nulp1 lDIIIIpnI add 3nI SBT aad 3nI NBT aad provide NBL aad EBLI 16 1Iart or4Freedmaa 17 IIart or4 Katdla Add SBR WBR NBR 4 EBR Remooe SBR aDd add 2ad SB1 2ad WB1 2ad NBL 2Dd EBL aDd WBR 20 IIart or 4 CIlapmall 21 acmeliae 4Freedmaa 22 CIemalliae 4 Katdla 25 1 SB Ram4F cmz 14 CIOIINIt WIIJI 10 3nI WBT IlIIUNIIT 10 NBL aad EBL 10 3nI EBT Add 3nI 181 2IId 58L 2IId NBL WIIJI 26 4 BaD 28 4 ModIfy 1 cA 15 1 NadIIy I aDdHOVIr io 1 29 ADaIaeia R LONG RANGE lMPUlMENTED BY YEAR 2010 llcoIooot WBUWBTIOWBL aad add 2Dd WBUWBT 2Dd WBRaad 2Dd SBL Add SBR aad NBR C llnaI SBLmIT 10 SBT add SBL aad SBR WBlAtd WBTIll ladWBT add WBLaad 3nI WBT NBR 10 2ad NBTINIIR EBU2DdEBTIO 2ad EBT aDd add EBL 3nI EBT aad EBR polelIliallywill iDdude WBpIe ir pIIlllq ec u s 10 D j pIIlllq 2IIdSBLIO 2ad SBLmIT WBR 10 add WBL 2Dd EBL EBR NBL NBT aad 2ad NBTIIlBR C llnaISBR 10 2ad 181 provide SBR add 4Ihwin CI SpeciIk Plaa CiIcuIaIiao Study m 1 I F A A IDe 35SOOUa 01983 e eel 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- e Table 11I 2 001I COMMITTED CIRCULATION SYSlEM IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION SHORT RANGE IMPUlMENTED BY YEAR 2000 LONG RANGE lMPUlMENTED BY YF AR2010 COMMJTI EDINTEIISECI ION IMPROVEMENTS I 30 AnabeimIHaatec Ka elIlo eoo enIharod 2Ild NBT 2lld NBR 10 2Ild NBT aad odd 3nI NBT 3nI SBT ad NBL 2Ild SBL ad WBL SBR WBR aad EBRU 33 Jf t II KateUa Madlfy for tnteneelioD 1 p aad n od 34 1 NB Ramp Katella 39 1 HOY Ramp GcDe Aully Madlfy for tnteneelioD 1 p aad n od CoaIIrueI iIlteneelioD I HOY truoitwoy N NBL aonllboulld IefI lUlD laDe NBT aonllboulld lIuu laae NBR riIbl lUlD laDe elc for southbound aad bouDd lmp pon otlhe 1 F projed A B 1 Loq n 2010 mitiplioa for Ihe DioaeylaDd Katella Sman Street ProjeeI im 0 COWII Meaotue M Coli Maaqemeu CMP IUpwlIy iIl e Aoalteim SpoaIIe PIu Cin ula Study III AIIIIlH oaol lac 355C1OZ o1 ---PAGE BREAK--- project area include colIStrUction of an Orangewood Avenue freeway crossing or reconfiguration of the freeway ramp system from Ball Road to Chapman Avenue and colIStrUction of an HOY transitway system that includes HOY ramps at West Street Flf Ilman Way and Gene Autry Way providing access east of the 1 5 Freeway ooly The year 2000 committed improvements listed on the table that are not associated with the 1 5 widening project represent intersection improvements that are planned to be COlIStrUCted over the next few yean and for which a means of funding has been established As mentioned in the previous chapter the long range year 2010 noproject alternative assume completion of the development plans for the adopted Disneyland ReIort and the proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plm Therefore it is assumed that any circulation improvements required for development of theae Specific Plan areas will be implemented by 2010 The 2010 committed improvements listed in Table m 2 represent the 2010 project improvements that were identified in The Dimeyland Resort FEIR Some of the improvements such 8 the alignment of West Street at Ball Road and the relocation ofCerrilOl Avenue between Walnut Street and West Street are related to on site project design while othen such 8the Harbor Avenue interaection improvements are intended to mitigate olf site impacts due to expansion ofthe Disneyland Resort Theae year 2000 and year 2010improvemenla are assumed to be in pIac e in the development of the respective noproject trafIK forecasts that are V N Iin the following sections 2000 NO PROJEer TRAmC CONDmONS In order to prepare short range year 2000 traffic forec asta in the vicinity of the Anaheim Resort estimates must be made regarding the Ieve1offuture development growth anticipated by 2000 in the study area and in the aunounding region For the JocaI area in and around the Anaheim Resort use was made of the Oty of Anaheim planning Department s inventory of related projectl that have been approved in the area Related projects that are usumed to be fuI1y or partially constructed by 2000 are listed in Table ID 3 Within the ARA the propolCd Hotel Circle Specific Plan is assumed to be completed however it is usumed that no expansion of the Cllisting operations in the Disneyland Resort Specific Spoci IcI u Cin ulatioll lady 1Dc 355OOZ ca m lo 01985 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Table m 3 e RElATED PROlE IN 1HB AIIAHBIM RESORT VICINITY LAND USB AMOUNT BUILDOUT IN I1lRIM DEVELOPMENT LOCATION LAND USB TYPB IYI AR 2010 IYI AR 2000 ANA1IEIM RESORT AR ARA The DiAcyIaDd R Rcaon nPort 4 2S00TSF SpedIlc PIall R Hold 7 01 R RclaiIIRaU 3000 TSF 4750 TSF 475 0 TSF Hold Hold SpedIlc PIall Rcaon Hold 1 103 R OOIIII 1 103 RtmJ ANA1IEIM BrADIllM BVSINI SS D1S 1UCF Sladium B Port Weal 01 SUCoIJoFISoaIIl om 1 5192 TSF 72U TSF 01 0Awy Way Hold 190 41 9 TSF 19 9 TSF HeaiIll Cub 40 0 TSF 190 TSF S CGIIcp PIaa W 01 Slate CoUqe NcrdI om 4675 TSF m s TSF 0I lDM B Ca Ilaol 01 Slate CoIJoFISoaIIl om 3lW7 TSF 11131 TSF 0I 7 oTSF 13 TSF Calnl Part T Ilaol 01 SUCoUqe NcrdI om S7lLO TSF 175 1 TSF 0I1CaIcIIa Hold 134 16J1 TSF 7 6TSF S T PIaa W 01 SR S7 01 0lIIce mo TSF 12lU TSF 31 4TSF 18 3 TSF AaalIcim SIadlCeorer W 01 SR S7 01 om 2IWTSF 1 GOU TSF Ora 04 P 3 Ilaol 011 5 01 om 24A TSF lUTSF 0 d u1KaIdIa 0lIIce Put w of SIaIe c Ill 0lIIce 1 17904 TSF S ilA TSF 01 S6JI TSF l67TSF KoII CaOrlP 1I Ilaol 0I1 m a01 0lIIce 1 021 1TSF 4861 TSF 0 J TSF SqI eol 0lJ 01 c R SllIdJ prq a t 17 199 J I 2lW e Rcaon SfIIdII PIa Sl m 1I IK 3S 002a ---PAGE BREAK--- Plan area occurs by 2000 with the exception of constructing the planned 475 000 square foot administration building Other related projects which are planned for development by 2000 within the Anaheim Resort will be descn hed in Chapter IV together with a discussion of their short range traffic impacts Existing land uses in the Anaheim Resort are assumed to remain unchanged under 2000 noproject conditions It has heen assumed that the growth in office development in the Anaheim Stadium business district will proceed at an average rate of400000 square feet per year which amounts to 3 600 000 square feet ofdevelopment from 1991 to 2000 1991 being the base year onwhich the citywide traffic model has been cah brated This represents approximately 48 percent of the 7 562 800 square feet ofoffice development approved in the Anaheim Stadium area therefore related projects in that area are assumed to be 48 percent d loped by the year 2000 Land use assumptions within the remainder of the City of Anaheim were estimated by interpolating between ezisting 1991 and 2010 data from the citywide traffic mode and outside of the City of Anaheim data was taken from the year 2000 version of the Orange County TrafIic Analysis Model OCfAM D Year2000 traffic forecasts were prepared using the citywide traffic model baled on these land use assumptions and the 2000 highway network discussed earlier and assuming achievement of an areawide 135 work trip AVR Daily traffic wlume projectiou for noproject conditionl are illustrated in Figure m4 Peak hour intersection turn wlUIIICI were also prepared for this scenario and leYels of service wbic h include implementation of the committed intenection improvements discussed earIier were calculated The reauiting 2000 noproject peak hour ICU are summarized in Table m4 together with ezisting ICU VBlIICI for comparison and FIJIII e m s illustrates the 2000 lane configuratiou which inc lude sbon range committed improvements Actual intersection turn wlumes and dMailed ICU ca1culation worbbeets can be found in Appendiz B h the ICU summary table indX ates thefollowing me intenectiona are projected to operate wone than the LOS 0 standard under 2000 noproject conditiotll Ram SpodII CIrcuIa1iaB SIlldy It F A J 1 m 12 01987 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e QQ6 O zoosst IS 3IIJ r END lIlds I 26 31 32 2 30 i lLWlA il E 6 B 3 CJl 7 L 0 rr 1 16 13 17 14 IIEST i 10 h 39 36 42 il 51 4ll 51 H I CJl Q y 26 19 24 HAS1ER OJ 0 L 22 9 s s 0 il I to 41 33 00 C TVOi 3 26 22 n 26 0 STAT I c l J z Iii 0Ie 1l ac ell a 12 I en A UNKIST 0 22 0 0 0 DCUASS en ---PAGE BREAK--- AaUdm SpeclIic PIu CimIIo1iao Sludy m 14 F Ao lac 1 01989 ---PAGE BREAK--- J J JH ttf Ul m JH ttr LOARA nf 1 Ul JH e tt I ii t I CU JlIIt tjoE I 1illlt1 il I l EUCUD 9TH WALNUT 4ij I rtft m I I lit T 4ft U HARBOR 0 I 4ij I I I HARBOR UlfT1 fT1 Zo i rfT1Tli I fT CIl l c CIl eJ q Z t1 C l B 0 p BPtpI lP CIl C n P I tPPB P t PB tlZ n g lj lCll 0 q 0 0 log P l pt l I tl IP lj B C il Il f Il B iltl CIl n8 I I Q tD rr COLEGE f 1 1JUl STATE J0 I t HASTER LEWIS SUNKIST u o l c B i DOUGl SS L if IIoo o oilil lj tl o9 c eJoZlJ it H o cocoo ---PAGE BREAK--- It LOCATION Euclid 4 Kalclla 3 WalDut BaU 1 26 AIlaheilII 4 Boll 35 LcwiI 4 KaldJa PEAK HOUR LOS PM PM PM AM PM E E E E E A special analysis was carried out to determine what types oC improvements are required to address these non project related deficiencies Table ms lists the specific improvements that were considered and the Conowing table summarizes 2000 noproject ICU values based on the suggested improvements 1000nON lIlOO NoPROlECl ICU VALUES WilliComlIIiIled 4 Naa commilled AM PM WltIl NB mM Lupnl II AM PM Euclid 4 Kalclla 3 w 4Boll 1 26 AIlaheilII 4 BaD 35 LcwiI 4 ICaIclla 78 91 61 77 75 91 71 78 70 T1 70 88 91 JIll JI4 78 58 94 48 Jll These improvements are considered IlCCCIlI8l to mitigate background future deficiencies which are unrelated to the proposed AnAJv im Rcsort development plan Although the funding oC these improYemenla baa not been eatablilbed it is Illumed that measurea will be taken to c10IeIy monitor the performance oC theac locations and to veriCy and implement the types oC improw menla that are nccesaary to addrea delicienciel that may occur OYCI the lICIl Cew ycan For the of this study it is therefore Illumed that the short range non committed improvemenla identified here will be in placeby 2010 HOWCYer in recognitionoC the status oCthese improvemeula the short range impact anaIyais presented in Chapter IV omi project imp8Cla at these Iocatiolll both with and without implementation oC the identified non mmitted improvemenlL e Spol iIIcPlu CIn uIotioA 51 m 16 J F I8c ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 01 2000 NON COMMJTI1 I BACKGROUND INTERSEC I10N IMPROVEMENTS LOCATlON IMPROVEMENTS eoa n pod WBR to 3rd WBT ud add 3rd EBT 20d WBL 20d EBL ud WBR 2 Euclid Kaldla 3 Walnut Ball Add SUR 12 Harbor IIalI Add 3rd SBTIZDd DR eoa nEBR to 3rd ESTIEBR 26 Anabeim IIalI 35 lcwio Kaldla Add 4lh EST 4lh WBT ud 20d EBL NOle NUL IIOItbboulld IcII IW1I NUT IIOItbboulld 1III u NUR IIOItbbouad rtpl lW1l ell rc bowld ooulhbouad ud t Requited 10 Iddn idcDlified 1IDder 2000 bM tp ouDd Iraftic CODdilioal witboul future cIopmall of the Anaheim Rcoon SpeciIic PIu Anabeim SpedIIc Ciradatiaa Study 01 17 1 1De 35 OOZ a 01992 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- 2010 NO PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDmONS e A set of noproject traffic forecasts which assume existing land uses within the Anaheim Resort were also prepared for year 2010 conditions For this setting buildout of the adopted Disneyland Resort and proposed Hotel Circle development pl3ll is assumed as weD as buildout of the related projects in the vicinity of the ARA that weresummarized earlier Land use assumptions within the remainder of the City ofAnaheim are based on buildout of the City s General Plan Land Use Element and for areas outside of the City use was made of the year 2010 land use projections provided by the County of Orange as contained in the OCJAM n traffic modeL The citywide traffic model was used to prepare year 2010 noproject forecasts based on the 2010 circuJation system discussed earlier and assuming achiewment of a 1 50 AVR for work trips in the region The resulting 2010 noproject AnT forecasta are illustrated in Figure m 6 Peak hour intersection turn volumes for this case were also prepared and forecasted levels of servic e were calculated based on intersection lane geometriCll vhich assume implementation of the 2000 committed 2000 non ommitted and 2010 committed circulation that were diSC earlier in this chapter The resulting 2010 noproject lCUs are summarized in Table m together with existing and 2000 noproject lCUs for comparison rlgUlC m provides illustrations of the assumed 2010 lane geometries and actuaI turn voluma and lCU calculation worbhceta for this case are included in Appendiz B the lCU summary table indicates a number of 1ocaDons are projected to operate at levels under 2010 noproject coaditions inc 1uding the CMP mouitored Harbor Avenue intersection LOS Fin the AM peak hourSimilar to the approlldl applied for evaluating 2000 noprojectcoaditions an anaIysia c arried out to icleDtify the typea of improvementa that are oeeded 10 address these long nul that are induced by future non project related bacqrouDdtraffic The resulting letof that wereconsidered is listed in Table m and illustrated in rJ UIC ms and Table m lista 2010 noproject peakhour lCU valua based on Aa the ICUsummary table iadicates the following three intersection locations are projected 10 remain de6cient with imp1ementatioa of the sugpted DOn committed e s1 IoII SIlllIy m 1I f taM w ---PAGE BREAK--- I tr66 O e polS IKlBI1WO OGJ 1IlOzI 61 m gpods UDIOlI CD I 29 34 J6 32 ElJCU I LONIA 1 0 3 L 11M 9 L j 0 r CD 0 18 18 9 24 19 29 CST I 1 V 1 4 I 51 40 36 43 45 I c rt 0 CD c B 29 HAS1EJl 19 8 s I vs I CD 41 0 CiTYii 36 43 44 35 29 31 35 0 STATE I tlzi 5 0 c 10 v 1l0OS 13 17 t Jt J I l JI SUNK1ST n Q i If 00 e ---PAGE BREAK--- Table m6 2010 lCU SUMMARY NO PROJECT 2000 2010 EXIS11NO NOPROJECT NOPROJECT LOCATION AM PM AM PM AM PM 1 4 Ball 66 80 74 89 1 ll3 1 03 2 Eudid 4 KaIClla 65 85 61 n 74 82 3 W lIIUI a BaD 73 92 71 78 89 1 15 4 WaIDw 4Cmilol 38 43 33 33 45 52 5 WaID 4 KaIClla 58 62 58 83 79 92 6 W 108m 4 Ball 57 54 65 62 7 W oorlh 4 Ball 52 62 63 86 76 91 8 W 4CcniloI 28 44 33 43 36 78 9 W 4 KaIClla 59 62 71 n 78 93 10 W 4 eootiaa 29 29 Y1 34 50 56 11 W 4 Onq wood 41 62 56 n 55 113 12 HaIIJor 4 Ball 65 76 70 8lI 81 114 13 HaIIJor 4 5 NB Rampol 4 6l 44 53 42 67 14 HaIIJor 4 5 58 Rampol 43 54 62 59 65 65 15 Harbor er 47 53 54 42 6l 16 HaIIJor 4 F 41 60 49 70 34 53 17 HaIIJor 4 KalCllal 52 66 63 68 1 D1 HI 18 HaIIJor 4 eootiaa 29 54 1 58 41 58 19 HaIIJor 4Onq wood 60 55 n 61 80 to Hart or 4 CIIa I 85 56 JI1 70 72 21 0 4F 3Z 23 21 19 31 22 0 4 KaICIla J2 40 I 76 67 25 1 5 sa Rampo 4 F 34 52 19 36 28 2AS Aaabdm 4 BaD 72 99 801 78 85 96 27 Aaabdm 4 CcniloI 73 39 63 51 91 28 Aaabdm 4 Y1 50 47 68 29 Aaabdm 4 F 47 63 4 60 55 68 30 Kardla 73 SI 61 67 98 79 32 Onq wood 49 65 HI 76 90 l9 33 A KaIeUa 70 68 1 01 I 34 5 NB Rampo 4KalelJal 49 n 63 62 83 85 35 LewiI 4KaICIla 39 41 41 JI1 78 1 Of 36 Slale CoIlcp 4KaICIla 50 All 50 79 74 1 OS 37 SR 57 58 Rampo 4KaICIlal 4 51 All 61 All 38 SR 57 NB Rampo 4 KaICIlal 44 43 58 I 62 39 HOV Rampo IIIIrf 17 17 Z2 19 1 C I u J CMP Z IClII i t l 01 icIeDci6ed 2lOOO v aM W M 3 lCU w w cl ideDIiIIed 2008 lI 2lOOO 3010 oHM ot D CMP al LcYdol DO 6OA 61 708 71 8Oe JI1 90D 91 IJIlIB IJ1l1 P Aaabdm SpodIIc PIIII Cln uIatiaa S1udy m 2O 1Dc e ---PAGE BREAK--- e LOARA tt tt lD rr J w mv l 00 VI 4 00 VI 00 oVI t 1X Vi m eJZ m Cl f m EUCUD Zt 1UJ t HARBOR tt Clt 1 Ztj 1 i2 4t WALNUT 0 ll0 0 t t 1 ZeJUJ STi 4 y ttt 00 z I 0z j 0 I zJ 0 I m r fhl iI Jm HASTER LEWIS i t lC w r l i hj Cl 6 ro U H ItI 0 c I r o1o o i c u Sr TI 0 8 S c l 0 d g Al 1lll a tJt 3 P po I t 1 ON 11l lo58 1 I 0t o p 3 j oa 1 g B 0 p g o i COLEGE ffl i STATE I o rr SUNKIST DOUGLAS Lc s o0 z IV o r o t 1 o 1 o II Zlo 1 c oJ u jS f E we ph o coco0 ---PAGE BREAK--- e IV ThiI chapter BDaiyzca the traffic impactl on the lurrounding circulation system due to de of the propoledjnaheiID Resort Spcc ific Plan Short range 2000 traffic projectioal are p ted baaed on cIcwelopment of 6nt ltage of the plan and long range 2010 traffic fOrecalll bued on the trip generating dwac teriatiol dacribed in OIapter n for buildout of the proposed plan are diacIIIICd In order to determine the projeet l potential imp8Cll tbcac traffic fOrecalll and corraponding 1cYcI of IeIYice estimateS are compared with the future noproject traffic COnditioDl dilculsed in the pnlYio chapter Potential mitiption wbich addrea identified projectimpactl are disc usaed in OIapter V Four long range 2010 allcl natM acenarioI are also omi at the end of this chapter three of wbich are baaed on buiIdout of the propelled plan but nning altemative circulation plana within the project area The fourth omi the impacll ofan altemative land lie within planning Area 7 ofthe j Jvojm Resort together with an altemative c plan 2000 PROJECT IMPAcrs The amount of project de oeIopIIIeIIt that II to occur by year 2000 OAAadI to the cIeveJopIMDt projedI within thejnaMlm Raort identified in the 0lJofj aMlm ptan in Departmeat mloIy of related IdjectL Table IV 1 bnnmarDia the j naMl Raort related projcc with trip paeration a ocia with the JIOUP of plojectL Thil1cYcI of futuJc dcat and traffic aeaeration aena the basil fordetennininI the JlIOPOICd projeet l short range 2000 traffic i r e s IV I o A 35 ---PAGE BREAK--- SPI CIFIC PRonrr USTING Table IV I ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFICI LA1IYEAR 2000 PROJEC IS DFVm nPMENT Hold cpko Qnl Reef KilII Hcaay1 F c a Suitca QZARJQZOO ANAHEIM RESORT PLANNING AREA LAND USE AMOUNT AND TYPE l5 10 16 18 7SO Rt HoIeI 159 Rt Hold 261 IVR 1 16 Rt HoIeI 17o IV r Cly CR StlIdy ptojecIIliatla D 7 1993 TRIP G1lNEIlA1101 1 LAND USE TYPE Hold r c w T UNrI S I OOS 261 IV 170 IV AM PI AK HOUR IN our TOTAL PI AK HOUR IN OUT TOTAL AnT 171 191 362 Nt 176 2117 IS l4 3P 34S 74 m S77 7 8S9 11 14 141 242 10 l4 76 m 4 10 us Note IV Sqaanl Feel 1 Trip I 1AIIIJaII ATAM Irip 14 lripm c 2000 Alar Irip w J Trip v oa ATAM r IIa for 1 JwI SpociIIcI aa StlIdy 1V2 F IK 01998 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Traffic generated by this stage of project dewlopment was distnbuled onto the surrounding circulation system using the citywide traffic modeL The resulting 2000 with project AnTvolumes are illustrated in Figure IV t Peak hour lCUs for 2000 conditions with this first stage of the project are summarized in Table IV 2 together with 2000 noproject lCUs for comparison lCU values are also listed with and without non committed improvements for thelive locations for which short rangeDOn committed improvements were identified in the previous chapter AA the lCU summary table indicates dewlopment of the first stage ofthe proposed project produces a measurable impact 01 of an lCU value or greater at one ofthe live locations that are forecasted to operate deficiently by 2000 without implementation of the DOn committed improvements The short range mitigation measures discussion in Chapter V address this PM peak hour project related deficiency identified at the intersection ofLewis Street and KateUa Avenue e 2000 CMP SYSTEM IMPACI S The Congestion Management Program CMP for Orange County requires that apropolCd dewlopment project s short range traffic impacts on the CMP highway network be identified as part of the project s traffic impact analysis AA the year 2000 lCU previously in Table IV 2 in licates the project s first stage ofdevelopment prodUl CS ameasurable impact 01 of an lCU value or greater at one ofthe six CMP Iocatiolll analyzed This 1cvel ofimpact at the Harbor BoulevardlKateUa Avenue iseoosiclerecl acceptable siDce it is forecast to operate better than the CMP 1evel ofservice E standard 2010 PROJECI IMPACI S In order to evaluate the project s Ion ranae 2010 impacla a set of traffic forecasts which include fun development of the proposed 4n Mim Raort plan was prepared using the citywide traffic model Fiame IV 2 mustrata the 2010with project ADT traffic forecasts developed in this m n and Table IV 3 IlIIIIJIWiza the 2010 with project peak hour lCU vaIueI togctber with comparative 2010 aoproject lCUL The 2010 lCUs implementation of the 2000 committed 2000 DOn committed and 2010 committed cim J lion that d in the previolll chapter and lCU valUC1 are included for conditiotll with and without eoostructioa of the identified 2010 IIOD committed background improvements e SpodIIc Cn oloIloa 5ludr 1V3 Jac ---PAGE BREAK--- ooo o pons 8l1OIlUD e tOOSst AI aw gpods tIIJ I T I 32 30 26 32 32 DlCUl I UlAlIA E 6 L 3 III L 7 0 13 16 13 17 L tEST i II10 u r 44 i 52 40 36 48 52 I III 0 Y 26 20 25 HAI1EIl III 0 L 22 9 s sl 0 l I i 41 R 26 0 CiTViii 26 22 0 33 I CWL 0 8 ATE l10 l J 0tc 8 12 l Jl llo SUNKIST l J I 0 22 l 0 G DOUQASS 00 100 e l J n ---PAGE BREAK--- e e oozo ipoas 0 r d S IIOIlIs JJ II a t ltt bt b iI II I St S tl s bS 1 8 l s a t ltt bt iI 121 S SS tl 81 bSiI c ta 3 1 q 0 0e i il lli 1 ill 81 ill 5i o U 0 00 I l ii 81 ltlt ---PAGE BREAK--- ogpods AI zoozo cuuast A i e If Ii oI1l lIlCll t rUlan Ji iiiii 1 1 Ii I ltil U a ltll lts lI tl III 110 U a 00 Ii UI w eelIIII pJUjIIIIIIfI if IIaJ iaJi fUIII lIIcn e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e EOOZO lpoqs 0 s 1lJ Jr i I 32 36 J6 3S 2 lOMA IUCLIl I co l 3 L 1 L 10 29 20 21 27 20 19 0 lEST I 3 I S21 63 S2 S2 42 I 7 7 9 33 0 42 33 8 13 t 5 1 i 19 0 36 3 CD 32 I coum 29 35 An 4 44 If 36 co III CiYOi 0 N 0 fi5 8 Cl OJ 4 l T III r B lleII1lOlYJ I iiP cn N C0 Ul ---PAGE BREAK--- tOOZO Ipqs 0 I V 1 1 11 I II i ijfiliijf llfilfliJliJlil s SM s c b a 2 ss s iI bt lsa 0 a cil at I s iw t i lS Is a E I c 1Il l 0 e ti le e Is SI S i Is iI 5 i E N 00 i f ss I at 1 1 1 liE E ll e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e IlllS llt U UlIfiIi r IIi I 1I I II ow ea b 3 i b ietlana bl5 tli lll r ietltlu s i UU Ills 0 UH 8f w AI u 1 S Sf if III Ii mlfi 1MI litIIih l Iff F1r II i Ii f1It8 ala 1II1 1n 900 O Mt ---PAGE BREAK--- The ICU summary table indicates that the proposed project produces measurable impacts ICU increase of 01 or greater at each of the locations that are forecasted to operate deficiently without 2010 non ammitted background improwments with the exception of the West Strcet Ball Road intersection In addition the foUowing three locations two of which have assumed implementation of 2010 non ammitted improwments drop to leYels of service when development of the proposed project is assumed LOCAnoN 19 a 0nJIFw00d 30 a KoldIo 32 a0napMl0d LOS E E E PEAK HOUR PM AM PM Measurable project impacts are also forecasted at the live intenection locations for which 2000 non ammitted improvements were identified four of theIe locations require additional 2010 non ammitted improwments to address delicienc ies due to non project related background traffic The proposed project s relative share of future traffic at the intenection locations for which non committed improwmenll have been identified or which are projected to operate deficiently with dewllopment of the project is summarized in FIpJS 1V 3 a11d 1V4for the AM a11d PM peat houn respectively These illustrations show the proportional compoaitionofeach future ICUvalue without 2010 non ammitted improw ments according to existing future non project related a11d future project related traffic shares lCU values with implementation of identified 2010 non ammitted are also illustrated for comparison 1biI traffic share information is intended to assist in the dew Iopment of a program for implementatioa of loaJ range that may be required to mitigate future intenection at locations whidI are imp8ded by the project The specific 101lJ range project mitiption mea with peel to projected d olW t intenec tions and locations for which non eommitted improw ments have been identified are discua in Chapter v SpodIIc PIooI SIalJ IV IO fI F 35 02006 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e 2 3 5 15 7 CD 9 I Z 11 12 F 17 m 19 26 27 30 32 33 35 36 3 i 2 i INlERSECllON LOCAliON REFERENCE MAP IQJ VALUE 5 6 7 8 9 to Ll 1 2 LEGEND Exiatina traffic ICV hare Future non project related ICV hare Future project traffic leU hare em leu w non Improvementll e AlIallcia Spec i6PlY CiraIIolloa ScudJ Flaure lV 3 2010 AM PEAK HOUR ICV SHARES 1V 1t JiJ l F IIIc 3 l5OlP ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 3 5 IS 7 III 9 2 Z It 215 12 F 17 m 19 iiE 26 27 30 32 33 35 36 3 7 2 5 9 11 INlERSECllON L OCAllON REFERENCE MAP 36 ICU VAlUE 5 6 7 8 9 La 1 12 1 3 1 4 15 LEGEND Exlstinl traffic ICU share Future non project related ICU share Future project traffic ICU h 1m ICU wjnon lmprovemenUo Fleure IV 2010 PM PEAK HOUR ICU SHARES SpociIk PIIs 0radsIia0 Sludy 1V 12 4 fb A I8c 35 Olll 02008 e ---PAGE BREAK--- ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS e In thia section four long range 2010 alternatives which involve modificatioDl to the circuIation system andor proposed land uses in the Anaheim Resort are The first three examine the impacta ofconstructing an enhanced artcriaI circulation system in the lOutheast portion of the project area and the fourth analyzes the of an czpandcd theme park development in tbe same area together with arterial system enhancements Fnh dArtertlIJ System AJtenathes The three 2010 circulation system alternatives Illume variolll CODltrul tion tap of a potential Co lion Way Gcnc Autry Way c bctw D Harbor Bou1cvard and the 1 Fr way and a Clementine Street from KatcUa Avcoue to Orangewood Avcoue 1bac roadways are currently included on the City GencraI Plan Circulation Elcment highway network and the three alternatives analyzed here Illume the following tap A1ternatiYc A Construction of Co tion Way a six Lane arterial bctw n Harbor Boulcvard and Haster Street and CODStrUCtion of Clemcntinc Street afour Lane artcriaI KateUa Avcoue and Oranacwood Avcoue A1ternatiYc B Constructioa of Oeoe Autry Way aa Lane artcriaI bct10 rn Haster Street and the I S A1ternatiYc C A1ternatiYc A p1111 A1tcrnatiYc B Land use IUUIIIptioaI within the 4n Jv naRaort anthe tboIc t for the 2010 with project conditioas d rd earIicr in thiI chapter with the ceptlou ofthe land propoIIld for 4n M un Raort P1 nlArea 7 and 10 wbich hne been zwh clue to dedication ofthe right ofway required for COIIItructioo of the propclICd arteriaIL The are ummarizIed folloM SpodIIl 1 lV U Fc 4 lie S e ---PAGE BREAK--- PROPOSED RESORT ANAHEIM RESORT HOll L PLANNING AREA LAND USE RIGHT OF WAY DEDICA110N ADJUS1ED RESORT HOll L CIRCULATION LAND USE ALlERNATIVES 7 10 3 6Oll 2 648 AudC BudC 4 223 2 843 R 8 2 A Ro 2 6A Ro Year 2010 traffic forecasts for the three circulation a1tcmalivea were prepared using the citywide traffic model and the resulting ADTwlumes are illustrated in Figures IV S through IV Peak hour IewIs of service for each alternative were cak ulated based on 2010 lane configurations which include the abort range and long range nonoQ improvements identified in Chapterm Additional imprOYeJDents assumed to beimp1cmented with construction ofthe Comention WaylGeue Autry Way and Cementinc Street extensions are illustrated in Figure IV 8 At part of the levc1 of service analysis the2010 DOn committed improvcmenuwere reevaluated as to their need under these circulation alternative conditions Non committed improvemenll that were found to be lIft Y under one or more of the a1ternalivea are IIIIIUII rizcd as foDowa 1NT RR rnnN NON MMrI I m NOT REQUIRED POll WHlOI AL mRNA11VEtS 7 w alloll 17 a Bac AaC c t WBR 10 3nI WBT WlIR c t 3nI NBT 10 3nI NBR Table IV 4IW11111l1rizea the2010 peak hour ICU willa for A1temalivea A through C togetber with the 2010 with project ICUI presented carIier in this chapter At the table iPdicatel the Alternative A improvemcau raokoe the II J that it Cu led It the intenection of Harbor Bou1evard aDd Oraupwood A lie and the A1teraatM B address the w w forecasted at the F A lie IDd Lewis Street intenectiona at Kate1la A ue while imp1cmentatioo of the imIO U asaociated with A1terJ1ati oeC reaolw ame ofthe ail projected de6cient IocatioaL The identified under ead11Ce111rio are IIIIIUII rizcdIfoDowa SfOdlIc SbIdJ F ill IV 14 02010 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e ocm Ipqs A no yogpods I 29 35 Jlj 2 32 IlCUl C E 11 13 I1H l 10 19 9 20 22 25 20 29 lEST I I 491 52 44 43 49 51 I 22 13 33 32 37 37 19 13 8 I il 3 III0 41 iTYiiR 43 4 35 29 32 36 0 I I STA caw GE 1 lri 5 C l Jo5lE s 14 18 lJ 1 lJ SUNOST o0 0iiQJiS 0rn ---PAGE BREAK--- o e paIS 0 JVl d r y Io OW gpods I co 29 35 J6 32 EJIQD 0 I UlMA 3 6 10 lL 13 19 20 2 27 20 29 0 i I u l 51 I 62 2 I 51 52 I 9 27 2 37 36 48 o 9 9 14 iil f 0 III0 35 2 3 29 3L 36 0 I auECE I SnTE l l t E s 0 3l O t t1 Cs Ql 14 18 l I cn SUNKIST l Ol a10 0 C cuss 0 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e c ozo Io ipaast f LI AI lIPOds I 29 35 Jj 32 t ICD 11 13 6 10 19 1 0 r t CD 19 21 23 25 29 lOT 0 I 501 55 r 47 2Q I 12 18 12 2 34 39 34 iiii OJ 19 14 9 j t I I iii I III 40 1 0 iiiYiii 42 34 29 32 36 0 I n l r CD 5 JolO v ztc II 4 18 I JI S1JNl lST t jUl no 0 DiGiASS 0en ---PAGE BREAK--- ALTERNATIVE A W CO ON fttf i ALTERNA TIVE B CON ALTERNATIVE C CON t i J f g LEGEND d Ian B c roun wned P emeD al Lane improv alternative lrculaUon tor c Cn olIla J m L fftt mi Fleur IV e URATlONS 2010 LANETIVEC GTHROUGH C ALTERNA IV II 1 r A CNq e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e IpaJS oIs 61 AI s oc o DIll rr d e Iffffillll fff r If E Efll EI 111 if Illil I nabl I t c I l Ul sia llda e U I a1Uls I I IUtnel UII I 0 a Iutt l ls l ta e i II I t a1 i lllt t II s a a1alll ls 5 0c0I s ls l I t 1I l t ts el tat eI n iI n I I s tll lt acUtlis UlslIlI I I ls l tt tl t ls sl eI I is ssa Ill s e I S ls all 1 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- ijIals c s U I lll i l UHlI 2f i3i3 I mfi j Ol e1 i Ii i IIi blll t I rn U 8 bn su n I1 llHs I t iUti tl ei l s I it fI I lll s z trrl o rl 01 1 9 O O 1 e I I SIWI alf I IftItHIlt 6Ii1l i II tiilll 01 11I e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e 12 Ha Ball 19 Ha an a od 30 AaahcimIIla Ka1clla 32 IluIer an a od n Maa 4 Ka eUa 35 Lowio Ka1cIIa 2010 ALT A 12 Ha Ball 30 AaabeimI laII r Ka1clla 32 IluIer an a od 33 MIlI 4KatcUa 35 Lowio Ka1clla 2010 ALT B 2010 ALT C 2010 PROPOSED PROJECT 12 Ha Ball 19 Ha an a od 30 Ka1cIIa 32 IluIer an a od 12 Ha Ball Pl nlnl Area7 Theme Puk AJtemathe For this alternative referred to here 81 Alternative 0it is Illumed that Anaheim Retort PllIDIling Area 7 is deweloped as a theme park use rather than raort hotel use For the purposea of this analysis the type of theme park use and the associated trip gcucration characteriaticl are assumed to be similar in nature to the proposed theme park analyzed for this site in 77w Disneyland Reson FElR Trip generation estimates for the Planning Area 7 theme park are summarized in the foRowing table together with the aite s raort hotel trip JCDCI Btion for compariaclll AM HOUR PM HOUR LUm USE UNn S IN our TOTAL IN our TOTAL MYr PlAIlNING AIIEA PIIOP08IlD RaGa IIOl Dug 4 ZZS 465 465 9JI 6 M 760 1 Z 466 PIANIIING AIIEA AL l DMA11YK TlIDIIt PAIIIiug 11leOIc Part su 124 3ft 1111 254 461 9 172 For the purposea of this anaIyIia it is IIIlIIIICd that tiDe Stn etwould be wI south ofICate1Ia A to the theme putsite and that this would provide prinwy to the site This alternative IIao that an inQ of GcIIc Autry Way is between Haater and the 1 Freeway e s PIoII a t SIudJ JV F ---PAGE BREAK--- Year 2010 ADT volumes for this scenario are presented in Figure lV 9 As in the analysis ofAlternatives A through C the long range non wmmitted identified in Chapter ill were also reevaluated for this scenario and the following was found to be unnecessary I INTERSECI10N NON COMMITIED MPROVF MIlNI 7 WOOl A JIoIJ CGavIn WBR 10 3nI WBT WBR The peak bour ICU valUC1 calcuIated for this alternative ume implementation of the remaining long range non wmmitted uwen u at the Huter Street and 1 5 HOV transitway ramp intersections with Gene Autry Way that are lISIOCiated with constrUCtion ofthe Gene Autry Way Clrtension The resulting peak bour ICUvalUC1 for this alternative arelisted in Table lV S together with the 2010 with project ICU preaeoted earlier in this chapter loa the table indicates the fonowing three locations are projected to remain cleficient under this scenario LOCAnON PI AIC HOUR LOS 12 AJIoIJ JO KoIdIa 32 Ao d P E E PM PM PM In the caae ofthe 4n Bou1evardIHaate Street intenec tioD at KateUa A uealthough the AM peak hour 6c ironcy forecaated 1IIIdcc bale caae 2010 conditioDa ia reIOIved in Alternative D the PM peak hour Ievd ofaenrice deterioratel to an unaa eptable Ieve1 primarily due to traffic pattern ahifta which are related to c onatructioD 01 the Gcae Autry Way anu s Cn lIIola SbIdl J F IVoZZ 02018 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e 6 OZO tlIlm ipoas D r d IZ ogpods I J4 36 32 t I r 11 13 L 9 lL 13 19 20 21 26 20 30 lEST I i 461 56 b 2 39 7 48 I 8 l 36 35 48 jiiiiI 19 13 9 i VS a III0 40 Ciniii 1 7 34 29 31 35 0 I If STATE aum l co Pl o m cIS 4 17 l J I UI lJ Cl co 00ui ---PAGE BREAK--- Table IV S 010lCU SUMMARY AL1l RNATIVI D lOIO 010 PROPOSED PROJECr AL1l RNAnvE p2 INTERS cnoN AM PM AM PM I Eudid A BaU 81 88 81 88 2 Eudid A Kaldla 76 86 7 87 3 W A BaU M 0 Ji1 86 W ACcrritoo 43 51 43 s6 S W A KaldIa M 88 61 86 7 W BaU 76 81 7S J 90 J 8 W A Ccrritoo sI 86 sI 82 9 W Kaldla 82 88 79 89 10 W ec 54 63 51 sa 11 W CJnaae od s9 s9 80 12 ABaU 77 1 03 76 un 13 A I S N8 IlampI A3 71 43 69 14 A I S SB IlampI M 77 65 73 IS AU A7 79 71 1 AF 39 63 3S s9 17 A KaldIa 82 80 16 79 18 Aec A7 69 s9 19 A AI 94 M 88 lO A 72 77 7 15 ZI ri AFi eedaIui 19 3S 211 3S 22 aliDe A Kaldla 79 7 79 15 J S SB RamJlI A Fre dmalI 31 so 31 s3 16 ABaU 77 15 87 rI Ccnilao s2 so Ii l8 A M 70 M 69 29 Fre dmalI Q 72 s6 81 30 A KaldIa 93 0 89 95 3J 0 71 32 Hllla AC u d 80 94 79 91 33 u XaIcIII LAIJ 63 87 51 34 I S N8 RamJlI A KaldIa If7 15 M 35 A KaldIa 67 94 65 36 CaIlep A 15 0 71 83 YI SR 57 sa IlampI l 63 Q 61 Q 3 SR SIN8 A EoldIa 88 63 51 63 39 IS ROV IlampI A 0 2Z 1 61 I U Qa IClIo r zooo o J laII 1 10 Ie 1 IacIdDI l D UwI 11II lOA 61 70 71 AIle 81 OD 91 111II8 I l111F SpedIIc PIa Stody IV at 02020 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e v 1bia chapter discussea mitigation measura for traI1icimpaela thatwilloccurwith ofthe pl OpOlled Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The ia to eatablisb a feasible and equitable traDlportation improvement program that can mitigate abort ranI and iong ranae traI1ic impacts which will occur 81 the proposed deYc10pment ia imp1emeotccL OVERVIEW In conjunction with other DeW dcve10pment in and aroUDd the b Mlm Resort the propoICIll Specific Plan will create the need for varioua abort range and long ranI traDlportatiOD improvements The approacb taken by the City of 4ft Mlm to emure of eded future circulatiOD impnwementl ia to requite aD DeW cIewlIopment witbiD the City to participate in ac in uIatIoo improvement fee progranL Addlt1oaaDy a DeWcIeve1opmeot project may bec ooditioDed to direct1y imp1emeot specific circulatiOD improvemeotl wben it baa been dcmonatrated that the need for sa improvementl ia primarily attributed to the propoIeCI development Cnloteut with tbia approac bthe propoIeCI projeel s n Car m It tatioa ofimpIovemeDIa wbich mitipte project related trafIic iIIlptia aepuated ilIto the lbIIowiD two 1 DireI tImpL tatioa 2 L pt Fee I ntatioa The mitiptioa Car Impacts which faD ilIto the 6nt caIepJ would be for Iill ownerldc Yclopcn of iDdMduaJ deve10pmentl witblD the A hooim Resort to actuaJIy COIIIU ICtthe identified improvemenll a cooditioo CarcIt votJofIm nt n pll0WDer deveJ0per would be able to pecitioo the City CouIIciI to catabIiab a t BIll t ell beaelit diatrict to s L SaIdJ V I F A ---PAGE BREAK--- include other areas of benefit in order to get reimbursed for beyond their fair share For the second category individual property owner developers wouldcontnbute to the of improvements through the payment of a impact fee In Chapter m a number ofshort range and long range DOn iXlmmitted circulation system improvements were identified which address futun that Ip8 occur due to background non project related traffic growth The propolCd mitigation at impacted locations for which non committed improvements have been identified faIIa into the impact fee implementation category IS long IS the Icycl ofservice forecasted under background conditions with implementation ofthe non committed improvements is maintained For Iocatiolll which areforecasted to operate at acceptable under background plus DOn c ommitted impw ement COnclitiolll but which become deficientdue to project impacts additional improvements are identified which repraent mitigation mC8Surea to be directly implemented by property owner developen ofindividual projects in the Anaheim ReIort The following sectiolll praentshort range and long rangemitigation mC8Surea that have been by applying this criteria to the project traffic impact results discussed in the previous chapter SHORT RANGE MI l1GAll0N MEASURES The abort range 2OOO analysis praented in the previouI chapter determined that DO short range circulation system de will be produced due to the bel of project development propolCd by the year 2000 but that the project meaurably impactl one of the me inlene ion locations which will require DOD committed improvemenll to IIIdreII 2000 DOproject e The project Ibort raage mitiptioa tbetdod iDwIYe CODtributing through the paymeDt of circulation improvement impaltfeea to the tatioa of the following intenectioll IN I ERSI CTION I 35 LA Add 4lII BIT 4lII WIlT lid BBL s PIoa SIlIdy F A 3 vz 02022 e ---PAGE BREAK--- LONGRANGE MITIGATION MEASURES The intenec tion loc atioDl which are forecasted to operate deficiently under 2010 conditiona with deYelopment of the proposed project and implementation of the identified DOn committed background improvements are as follows 12 Harbor Ball 19 Harbor Orangewood 30 AnaheimlHaster cl Katcl1a 32 Halter Orangewood 33 trf qr ter cl Katcl1a 35 LewiI cl Katcl1a The detic iency forecasted at the Harbor Boulevard Ba1I Road intcnection is primarily attnbuted to non project related trafIic growth due to buiIdout of the Cty1 General Plan A1so DO additional feasible improYCmenll beyond the identified Iong ranJ C IIOD committed b4jlau 1I could be determined for this location Recognizing the reIatiwIy low 1cml of project impact at this intersection it is recommended that this location be for Ipecial study outside of this anaJ sis and that the propel LJ owner devdopen of individual projects contribute to the CllIt ofsuch a study through the payment of adevelopment impact fee Similarly DO feaSIble improwmenll beyond the mitted and IIOD mmit tcd improvcmeoll discussed in C1apter m could be identified for the BouIevard HaIte Street t A ue and LewiI Street intenections a100g JCatcI1a AYCDue and lare fmec ted at two of the three IocatioIII with or without development of the proposed project Aa Maratcd in the c in ulatioa a1ternatiYes anaIyIis iD the previous chapter tile at ead1locatioa resoMd wbeo it is med that Comatioa Way Ga1te Autry Way is COIIItr Harbor Bou1evard and tile 1 5 FI l AltcmatiYe C The Ocae Autry Way Iea betwliD 1Uster Street and tile 1 5 F y iD particular providesc ritica11y DeedellIOIldway capacity for tile lIow oftrafIic 1IIiDg tile artcria1 freeway It is o euo that a Ipecial study be carried out to detcn tile feaibiIity and impleUl of CIlIIIIruCtia tile 1 J and that tile p ot eo11 owner deYelopen of individual projects coatrlbute to tile CllIt ofIIId1 astudy as well as tile ultimate hlpIewe4tatioa of tile h jlao t through tile tl 4t ofa dek r impact fee e s G V l no ---PAGE BREAK--- For the Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street intersectiOJlJ with Orangewood Avenue the following improvementa when implemented as part of project c eIIelopment address the identified project related deficiencies IMPROVBMENT 19 a an ood n a an ood Add riPl Add lad 1dI ICU SUMMARY W1 llf IN I1 RSIcnON WIO N lS AM PM W AM PM 19 A On 4 II 3Z a AI 80 67 JJJI 90 18 94 94 It should be noted that tbcIe improvements are DOt ft ry for 2010 with project traf6j conditions wbic h Illume COlIftructioO of CDmIention Way GeDe Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and the 1 5 Freeway and Cemcntinc Street between KateDa Avenue and Orangewood Awoue The overaJ1 program of t f Ioutranae mitipoo in Table V I The tint part of the table IiIII the intenection J eCX IInM for direet and the aec oncl part of the tabJc IUIlII11lIrizea otbcr noa committed the need for wbich is partiaDy attributed to cIcveJopmeut of the A Raort Ibc paymeat of the Otya cin ulation improYemcDt fee isc onAdcred 10 be aJIIOjlefty owner devdopcra cootributioa 10 the ultimate of thaeimpI lM meDlI or other future ilIlpaow mcn1l wbich 1Uf be neeci fin the viI inity of the project area The 1at part of the tabJc IUIllIlIIriza the two area of apec ial atudy in wbic h JII t OWIICIc1cveIopea of individual An Resort projecta are rec omt f 10 participate S IdIo SI8dJ v r t1 11M 35 00 02024 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Tobie V I LONG RANGE MITIGATION MEASURES 1MPAC1 MI11GATION D1IIIIICI 1MPU M1 NTATION 1be Im LOCATION 19 0nIIpMl0d 32 Holler 0nIIpMl0d are 10 be bar MIl pal ot bIa Jkl Alr I oltbe ADaIIebD a n MENTS Add NBR Add ad NBL 1MPAC1 M1 I1GAl101f IMP11OYEM1 lnnz IMPLI MIlNTAllON Y IJo 1 Raart ia1prOl IIcbroqb be ofc in aIaIicb r I feD I 1toIcIIo NON DMMrI 1 D1MPR0VIlMENTS 0EBR 3nIESTI lR WBR 3n1 WBT WBa odd lid BBL lid WIlL 0 WBR 3nI WBT odd 3nI EST lid WII1 adBBL WBR Addsaa SIIlA1ITIOSBT EBRIO 3nI ESTI lR WBR 3nI WBT WIIR odd SBL NAlIpIiI 0 WBIAod WBT IO ad WBT WBR10 3nI WBT WIIR odd WIlL 3rd Add adBBL 0 WBT WBR1O adWBTI 1lA odd WIlL Add 3rd SBTIlod 3rd NBT 4ll WBT adSBL 03rd NBT 10 3rd NBT lId NBR 0 EBR 3rd EST E1IR odd lldWII1 lId BBL EBR 0WBT 10 WBT 2IId WBR c t EBR 10 4ll ESTIIlIIR c t NBRIO 3rd NBT tIIIR ad ad BBL Add EST WBT ad BBL SBR 10 lid SBTISIR odd adNBT ad SBL lid NBL Add W8JC 1lBR l OCA110N 1 110II 1W 1IoII S W 9 11 W Cran at 1 110II 17 16 8d 77 Carlklo IlL 32 00 I 35 36 0llIep IP1IIl IALI 11lD J at a t 10 ot 10 lordie 1 L 2 4 1 5 dle 10 NBT Il L NBIt II 1 Jar r J HaI IrC w o II T J die 1 5 I I ReqonIIIO 00 HaI IrO 11 J 4 II IMIII o J I u e a tSf Vs F t ---PAGE BREAK--- T m 7 1010 NON coMMlIl1 DBACKGROUND JInERSIlCl10N IMPROVl N1 NTS1 LOCAll0N IMPROVEMHNT 1 EuclId aBaD o n EBR 10 3nI EBTIEBR 1IIIIlriped waR 10 3nI WBT WBR Idd 2M BBL 2M WIlL o n S1I1ABTIoSBT 1IIIIlripedEBRIo 3nIEBTIEBR WBR 10 3nI WBT WBR 1dd SBL NnI opIiI o n WBUZIId WBT 10 2M WBT waR 10 3nI WBT WBR Idd WIlL3nI 3 WaJaut a BaD S WaJaut a KaIdIo 7 W a BaD o nWBR 10 3nI WBT WBR Add2M BBL 9 W a KaIdIo 11 W a o n 10 WBT WBR 10 2M WBT WBR Idd WIlL 11 HarllaraBaD Add 3nI NBT 4lIl WBT2M SBL 17 Harllara o n3nI NBT 10 3nI NBTaot Add2M 2M EBLEBR o n WBT WBTaot WBR o nEBR 4lIl EBTIEBR o n 3nI NBTINIIR 1dd 3nI SBT 2M WBL 2M BBL SIIA o t SIIA 2M SBTIIBR 1dd 2M NBT 2M SBL2M NBL Add4lll 26 aBoll rI aCariIoI 30 a 31 0 1 d 3 I a 36 CclIqoa NoIc NBL l f NBf NBR lo dPt I Rolqoirod 101 at Nell l 411 L at 0 J a1Y 4 Not Jara T J 01 100 at I a IY 0 SlIIdJ r 1v m za 02026 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- il J 1 6J L e L I IlE4f1fit LOARA I ffit lD F COlCE ll VI J fl VI 4 STAlE VI m Jillij 4f1tff EUCUD ffit WALNUT F E ij ill V t HARBOR 4f1ttr E I Z cil o I zli1 HARBOR t LE MS WEST HASlER Ul rT1 fT1 Zo v trfT1 t IIFI SUNKIST DOUGLASS l51 I I 8 It III0 gfiff 0 83 c CIl 3 1t 3 tIlq d g 5 tzj oQ d P go 11 0 rOo t 0 i JCI c Z Sg l o l OQ l g i 7 03r 7 0 l 3 p 1 0 p Z 00 t J i P 30 l 18 e tl o CIl z 1 0 tJ Z I 0 t 0 tl ii2tl llo lCtl en IIIo o t J1 00 0 Z 12c t J tl T III Cl 00 z CIlQ u oc Ztl f fE 1 n r tl 1DrJ 2oIj ---PAGE BREAK--- Table In 2010 ICU SUMMARY NO PROJEct PLUS NON XlMMI reDIMPROVEMENTS 2010 NoPROJEcr PLUS 2010 NoPROJECI IMPROVEMENTS INTERSEcnON AM PM AM PM 1 Eudld A BaD 1 03 UI3 81 86 3 WalaUl A BaD 6J 1 15 66 86 5 WalaUl A KatcUa 79 92 62 80 7 W A BaD 76 91 76 81 9 W A ICatcUa 78 93 78 8Z 11 W A 0nlIpw00d 55 1 13 54 16 1 HarlIo A BaD 81 114 78 lll 17 HarlIo A ICatcUa1 1 01 fJI 74 J 26 ABaD 85 96 75 88 r A CerriIoo 51 91 51 85 30 A KatcUa 91 79 88 78 32 I aIIcr A 0nlIpw00d 80 1 19 73 8Z 33 at L ICaIdJa 01 5lI 35 Lcwio A KatcUa 78 1 04 65 2 J6 Slate0 lIeIe A ICatcUa 14 1 15 4 88 I C I CNP 2 ICU Uf t tioD 01 ideadfIed 2000 2000 I IIId 21010 nM a 3 101 imf t 01 idcGIiIed 2000 itI 2000 na I aad 2010 ltMII pi 2010 Mi bocqrouad ImprDI fa T m 0I CMP oI E Lewll 01 00 60A 61 1OB 71 80 C 81 90 D 91 1 00 B 1 00 F SjldIO Clrc ldaIa SIlIdJ m Jo 1 awn e ---PAGE BREAK--- LOCATION 12 Ball 31 a Katdla 35 Lewis a Katdla PEAK HOUR PM AM PM LOS F FI In the caseofthe Manchester AvenuelKateUa Avenue intersection no feasible intprovements could be determined beyond those planned as part of the I S Freeway widening project It should also be noted thaI the level of service estimates at a nwnber of locations are shown to intprove if additional arterial extensions are constructed in the area specifically the connection of Co lion WaylGene Autry Way from Harbor Boulevard to the IS Freeway and the extension of Cementine Street from KateUa Avenue to Orangewood Avenue As will be discussed in Chapter IV circulation alternatives which assume these types ofimprovements address deficiencies and affect the need for long range nOIl ammitted improvements at the foDowing locations 7 West BaD 17 Harbor KateDa 30 AnaheimJHaster KateUa 33 Manchester KateDa 35 Lewis KateDa Since the non ammitted improvements sugcsted here represent unfunded future improvements the Iollg range 2010 impKt ana1ysis that is d rw in the following chapter mines project impacll both with and without of these improvemenlL The project s responsibility Cor fundingand or imp1emelltation ofthe identified short range and long range lIon Jmmitted improvemeDlI is diocllPed in Chapter V SpedIIc PIIlI Cln uIIla SllIdy m Z5 A1rJJ F IDe 02029 e ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX C t R1GIIT oF WAY ACQUISITION DESCRIPIlONS e ---PAGE BREAK--- AREAS OF POTENTIAL R O W REQUIREMENTS ANA r sg 7 W W PGo Z Z Uil Q r1 CLEAR D BY THIS UR I r j I m U IIZhQJ inDb U @ill Jtg W l tQ r D LLL 11 d U I SCALE 1 2 000 I I 1 LL i mmr Ji e 0 D I 11 J t IE3 ill Iff i I cr c tJ i I 1 1 j n 11 il 7 I r ERR11Ps A hi R 10 I t h l i L g g I Iii 1 fmrn P I a M705A iii r u 1 f j jE 1w I I J tJ I i r 1 I Ii JI bi 4r I m i I j iic I II i i l i l I If Ii 1 11 r lj i i t n liii JIi iiiFI1 ruiICl 1 y L S uu WLJ rr fi JI i L I IL c i 1 Ie IF 1nril lIL rUL 1 I 1f iU r J VI i i j j I L j I I n I l n J wwi F COIMNTlON J ii l y i IILJ Ir CeNTeR I r II J 1 c 1 IlJULhl NCnCO A L J It r h nn l l ll 000 I I 1Ji 1 1 l IU lLf J 1 Q JI r IMi JUT 1 F11o I rrtt5 r J I I II II g I h n ---PAGE BREAK--- e e ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLANIEm EXHmIT El Description of Right of Way Requirements General All dimensions and limits of right of way requirements described as follows are approximate only and are subject to final design and approval by the City Engineer Alro Wav 1 East of Manchester Alro Way will retain its current right of way width therefore no right of way is required Ball Road 1 Walnut Street to 350 wlo WestlDisneyland Drive North Side A 3 foot width is required to achieve a 106 foot right of way 2 350 wlo WestDisneyland Drive to West Disneyland Drive North Side A 3 to 5 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate additional through right and left turn lanes at the intersection with West Disneyland Drive 3 West Place to West Disneyland Drive South Side A 5 to 16 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate additional through right and left turn lanes at the intersection with West Disneyland Drive 4 West Disneyland Drive to Ox Road North Side A 5 to 10 feet width is required to accommodate additional through right and left turn lanes at the intersection with WestDisneyland Drive 5 West Disneyland Drive to Ox Road South Side A 5 to 0 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate additional through right and left turn lanes at the intersection with West Disneyland Drive 6 600 wlo Harbor Blvd to Harbor Blvd North and South Sides Sufficient right of way exists to accommodate the proposed critical intersection 7 Harbor Blvd to 600 elo Harbor Blvd North Side A 15 to 0 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate the proposed westbound founh through lane at the intersection P QSe nou All dimen rions GTt approximalt and aTt to the approval of the City Engineer ---PAGE BREAK--- Casa Vista Street 1 South of Katella Casa Vista Street will retain its current right of way width therefore no right of way is required Cerritos Avenue 1 Walnut St to West Disneyland Drive Existing right of way will be exchanged for new 65 foot right of way to accomplish the 1 000 to 100 foot northerly relocation of this portion ofCerritos Avenue as part of the effort to discourage increased traffic on neighboring residential streets Clementine Street 1 Katella Ave to Freedman Way A 12 foot width is required on the west side of Clementine and a 13 foot width is required on the east side of Clementine from Katella to 600 feet north of Katella to achieve an 87 foot wide right of way From 600 feet north of Katella to Freedman a 10 to 5 foot transitioning width is required on the west side only to achieve the 87 foot wide right of way 2 Katella Ave to Resort Bdry Approx 600 n o Orangewood Ave An 87 foot width is required to join the existing Clementine Street at Katella with Clementine Street at Orangewood which presently terminates 600 feet north of Orangewood Convention Wav 1 West Street to N Convention Drive Convention Way is a private street and no right of way is planned at this time Any future right of way requirement is not cleared by this EJ R 2 N Convention Drive to Harbor Blvd Convention Way will retain its current 110 foot right of way width therefore no right of way is required Freedman Wav 1 Harbor Blvd to Interstate 5 A 45 to 50 foot transitioning width on the north side of Freedman Way and a 0 to 4 foot transitioning width on the south side of Freedman Way are required to achieve a 109 foot wide right of way Harbor Boulevard 1 Orangewood Ave to Katella Ave Generally a 12 foot width is required on both sides of Harbor to achieve a 144 foot wide right of way However from 600 feet 2 Please noU All dImensions art approllmatt and au subjullo the approval of ht City Enginur 02033 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e south of Katella Avenue to Katella Avenue a 12 to 23 foot transitioning width is required on the east side to accommodate intersection right and left turn lane additions 2 Katella Ave to 300 slo Manchester Ave West Side A 23 to 12 foottransitioning width is required from Katella to 600 north of Katella to accommodate intersection right and left turn lane additions From this point north to Freedman Way a 12 foot width is required From Freedman Way to 300 feet south of Manchester Avenue an 8 foot width is required 3 Katella Ave to Manchester Ave East Side Generally a 12 foot width is required from Katella north to a point approximately 600 feet south of Manchester From this point north to Manchester a 12 to 23 foottransitioning width is required to accommodate intersection lane additions 4 North of 1 5 to Ball Road West Side Existing right of way on this side of Harbor is sufficient to accommodate intersection lane additions 5 North of 1 5 to Ball Road East Side A 25 foot width is required to accommodate intersection lane additions 6 Ball Road to Vermont Avenue From Ball Road to 600 feet north of Ball Road on the east side of Harbor a 37 to 20 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate intersection lane additions as well as a City bus bay project Involving several properties fronting the east and west side of Harbor Boulevard north of the intersection limits widths varying from 0 to 25 feet are required to achieve a 120 foot roadway right of way Haster Street L South of Orangewood Ave to n o Katella Ave An 8 foot width is required on both sides of Haster to achieve a 106 foot wide right of way except at the intersections with Katella Avenue Pacifico Avenue and Orangewood Avenue where additional right of way is required to accommodate intersection lane additions At the Katella intersection a 17 to 8 foot varying and transitioning width is required on the west side of Haster from Katella to 600 feet north of Katella A 13 to 8 foot varying and transitioning width is required on the west side of Haster from Katella to 600 feet south of Katella At the Pacifico Avenue intersection an 18 to 8 foot transitioning width is required on either the west side of Haster from Pacifico Avenue to 600 feet north of Pacifico Avenue or on the west side of Haster from Pacifico Avenue to 600 feet south of Pacifico Avenue While Pacifico Avenue from Haster to the 1 5 is a General Plan requirement it is not cleared by this E I R 3 PI ase note All dimtnsiofLS art approximate and art subject to thi approval ofthe Cry Enginur ---PAGE BREAK--- At the Orangewood intersection a 16 to 8 foot transitioning width is required on the west side of Haster from Orangewood to approximately 500 feet north of Orangewood A five foot width is required on the west side of Haster and a 10 foot width is required on the east side of Haster from Orangewood to approximately 600 feet south of Orangewood Katella Avenue L 650 wlo Walnut Street to Walnut Street A 0 to 12 foot transitioning width is required on the north side of Katella to allow for west bound lane transitions No additional right of way is required on the south side of Katella 2 Walnut Street to West Street South Side Generally a 12 foot width is required to achieve a 72 foot half street right of way However from 600 feet west of West Street to West Street a 12 to 23 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate intersection lane additions 3 Walnut Street to West Street North Side Generally a 15 foot width is required to achieve a 75 foot half street right of way However from Walnut Street to 750 feet east of Walnut a 35 to 15 foot transitioning width is required to acconunodate intersection lane additions 4 West Street to Harbor Blvd North Side Generally a 19 foot width is required to achieve a 79 foot half street right of way However from West Street to 600 feet east of West Street a 30 to 19 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate intersection lane additions 5 West Street to Harbor Blvd South Side Generally a 12 foot width is required to achieve a 72 foot half street right of way This 12 foot width is also sufficient along most frontages within the intersection limits where the right of way increases to accommodate intersection lane additions A 23 foot width is required at this location along one property s frontage 6 Harbor Blvd to Haster Street Generally a 23 foot width is required on both sides Katella to achieve a 166 foot half street right of way 7 Haster to 1 5 A 15 foot width is required on both sides of the street to increase the 9 foot parkways to be provided by Caltrans to 24 feet consistent with the 166 foot right of way 8 500 w o Lewis St to Lewis St Additional right of way is required for this portion of Katella Avenue which is between Caltrans improvements to the west and Smart Street improvements to the east An 8 to 6 foot transitioning and varying width is required on the south side of Katella Avenue An 8 to 21 foot transitioning and varying width is required on the north side of Katella to acconunodate a bus bay 4 Pleast nore All dImensions art approxlntaU and art subject to the approval of the City 02035 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Manchester Avenue I West Manchester Ave east west portion from Harbor to 1 5 A 15 to 0 foot transitioning width is required on the south side of Manchester from Harbor Boulevard to approximately 270 feet east of Harbor Boulevard to achieve a 90 foot right of way throughout this portion ofManchester Avenue 2 Mid Manchester Ave parallels 1 5 between West Manchester and South Manchester The existing 47 foot wide right of way will be used by Caltrans for the 1 5 widening Caltrans will acquire an equivalent width to replace the width used for the widening An additional 20 foot width is therefore required to achieve the 67 foot right of way 3 South Manchester Ave north south portion from 1 5 to connection with Clementine at Freedman A total of 17 feet of right of way width from the east and west sides of South Manchester is required to achieve an 87 foot right of way 4 Southeast Manchester Ave s o Katella to the s ly boundary of the Anaheim Resort No additional right of way is required on this portion of Manchester Avenue where the total right of way width will remain at 50 feet Oranlewood Avenue I 300 w o Harbor Blvd to Harbor Blvd Five foot widths are required on the north side of Orangewood Avenue from 300 feet west of Harbor to 130 feet west Harbor and on the south side of Orangewood from 150 feet west of Harbor to Harbor to achieve the required 90 foot right of way In order to maintain Orangewood s 13 foot parkway within the intersection limits and accommodate intersection lane additions an additional 10 feet of total right of way is required approximately 500 feet east and west of the intersection with Harbor Boulevard 2 600 w o Haster Ave to 250 e o Haster Ave Sprague Ave An 11 foot width is required on the north side of Orangewood Ave at this location to accommodate intersection lane additions Ox Road I North of Ball Road Ox Road will retain its current right of way width therefore no right of way is required Pacifico A venue I Harbor Blvd to Haster Street This portion of Pacifico A venue presently does not exist therefore a 110 foot width is required to achieve the 110 foot right of way 5 Pltast nou All dimensions art approximau and art the approWJl of the City Enginur ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 Haster Street to 1 5 A 106 foot width is required to achieve the 106 foot right of way This portion of Pacifico Avenue is a General Plan requirement and therefore is not cleared by this E IR Vennont Avenue I Vermont Avenue will retain its current right of way width therefore no right of way is required Walnut Street I Cerritos Ave to 1 340 n o Cerritos Ave A twenty five foot width is required on the east side of Cerritos Ave Over the northern most 200 feet the width transitions from 25 feet to 37 feet West Street Disnevland Drive L 1 5 to BaIl Road A 37 to II foot varying and transitioning width is required on the east side of WestDisneyland from Ball Road to the 1 5 interchange limits approximately 850 feet north of Ball Road A 13 to 0 foot varying and transitioning width is required on the west side of WestDisneyland from Ball Road to the 1 5 interchange limits 2 Ball Road to West Parking Area The required right of way for this new portion of WestDisneyland varies considerably from the north south oriented portion at the north end which joins the intersection at Ball Road through the curved middle portion to the eastwest oriented portion near the Parking Area at the south end The required right of way is estimated to be 148 feet at the north end transitioning to 260 feet through the middle to 93 feet at the south end 3 West Parking Area to Katella Ave Varying and transitioning widths from 2 to 8 feet are required on both sides of WestDisneyland to achieve a 95 foot right of way However from Katella Avenue to 600 feet north of Katella a 20 to 3 foot transitioning width is required on the west side of WestDisneyland to accommodate intersection lane additions On the east side in this vicinity a 19 to 2 foot transitioning width is required to accommodate intersection lane additions West Street I Katella Ave to 600 s o Katella On the west side of West Street a 3 foot width is required to accommodate intersection lane additions On the east side an 18 to 0 foot varying and transitioning width is required to accommodate these lane additions 6 Please flOU All dimenSIOns are approximau and au 10 tht approval of the Ciry Enginur 02037 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Zevn Street e 1 Zeyn Street will retain its current right of way width except at the cul de sac end where a 60 to 100 foot transitioning width is required for an approximate length of 110 feet This right of way is required to improve the substandard cul de sac Juclid BaIl Intersection A nine foot width is required on the west side of Euclid Street from Ball Road to 250 feet north of Ball Road to accommodate intersection lane additions Euclid Katella Intersection A five foot width is required on the south side of Katella A venue from 270 feet west of Euclid Street to Euclid Street A five foot width is also required on the north side of Katella Avenue from Euclid Street to 460 feet east ofEuclid Street The end 120 foot portions of these widths furthest from the intersection transition from 5 to 0 feet This right of way is required to accommodate intersection lane additions Harbor ChaDman Intersection A 10 to O foot transitioning width is required along Harbor Boulevard from Chapman Avenue to approximately 420 feet north of Chapman Avenue Anaheim Ball Intersection A 0 to 8 foot transitioning width is required on the north side of Ball Road from 600 feet west of Anaheim Boulevard to Anaheim Boulevard A 15 to 0 foot transitioning width is required on the north side of Ball Road from Anaheim Boulevard to 600 feet east of Anaheim Boulevard A 7 to 0 foot transitioning width is required on the east side of Anaheim Boulevard from Ball Road to 600 feet north of Ball Road A 12 to 0 foot transitioning width is required on the east side of Anaheim Boulevard from Ball Road to 600 feet south of Ball Road e 7 Please nott All di nsions aft approximate and aTt subjtCI10 the approval of the City Engineer ---PAGE BREAK--- APPENDIX D NOISE ANALYSIS TABLES 02039 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Soecific Plan TABLE 0 1 YEAR 2000 NO PROJECT Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL lin feet From Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway FromlTo 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB EastlWest Arterials Ball Road wlo Euclid St 61 185 581 69 5 0 5 Euclid StJLoara St 71 219 689 70 2 0 3 Loara StJWalnut St 65 198 624 69 8 0 3 Walnut StJWest St 86 266 839 71 1 0 6 West StJl 5 82 252 796 70 8 0 1 Harbor Anahein Blvd 83 246 774 70 2 0 3 Anaheim St 89 273 860 70 9 0 5 Olive StJEast St 88 272 861 7L2 0 5 East College Blvd 84 259 818 710 0 4 State College St 82 252 796 70 8 0 0 Sunkist 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 719 0 3 Cerritos Avenue wlo Euclid St 50 50 15 63 6 16 Eucl id StJ9th St 50 50 109 62 2 2 0 9th StJWalnut St 50 50 152 63 6 0 6 Walnut StJWest St 50 50 109 62 2 0 0 Anaheim St 50 50 125 63 5 10 Lewis College Blvd 50 50 63 60 5 3 5 State College St 50 50 63 60 5 1 0 Sunkist 57 50 50 63 60 5 0 0 Convention Way elo West St 50 50 50 575 0 0 wlo Harbor Blvd 50 50 50 59 2 17 Gene Autry Way Lewis College Blvd 50 74 233 66 2 3 Katella Avenue wlo Euclid St 69 212 667 70 0 2 Euclid StJ9th St 65 198 624 69 8 0 2 9th StJWalnut St 63 191 603 69 6 0 Walnut StJWest St 102 311 979 7L2 0 3 West StJHarbor Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 717 0 2 Harbor St [PHONE REDACTED] 715 0 2 e JB OOSS cRA O D 2 Noise Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Soecific Plan TABLE 01 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL lin feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Clementine StJHaster SI [PHONE REDACTED] 7L6 0 2 Haster StJManchester Ave 102 311 979 712 0 9 Anaheim SI [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 0 2 Lewis College Blvd 100 302 950 7Ll 0 4 State College Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 7L6 L2 Howell AveJSR 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 726 0 7 SR 57 Douglas Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 72 1 0 8 Orangewood Avenue Euclid StJ9th SI 50 83 259 66 3 1 3 9th StJWest SI 50 96 302 67 0 2 0 West StJHarbor Blvd 50 137 431 68 2 19 Harbor SI 55 164 517 69 0 2 4 Haster StJLewis SI 71 219 689 70 2 6 0 Anaheim College Blvd 96 300 947 716 6 4 State College 57 86 266 839 7Ll 3 9 e Freedman Way Harbpr SI 50 96 302 67 0 2 5 Clementine StJHaster St 50 104 323 66 9 2 7 Howell Avenue State College St 50 50 63 60 5 10 Sunkist St Katella Ave 50 50 78 61 5 1 4 Chapman Avenue 9th StJWest SI 50 137 431 68 2 0 2 West StJHarbor Blvd 50 158 495 68 8 0 5 Harbor Blvd tHasler St 63 191 603 69 6 0 0 Hasler St lLewis St 59 178 560 69 3 0 2 Lewis St iCity Dr 50 137 431 68 2 16 5 SR 57 75 232 732 70 5 0 6 North South Anerials Euclid Street Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 59 179 560 693 0 2 Orangewood AveJKatella Ave 69 212 667 70 1 0 8 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 71 219 689 70 2 0 7 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 71 219 689 70 2 0 6 Ball Ave 67 205 646 69 9 0 6 02041 JB OOS5 CRA D 0 3 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson 50ecific Plan TABLE D l continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerl ine to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway FromlTo 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB 9th Street Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 50 94 622 0 0 Orangewood AveJKatella Ave 50 50 125 635 0 0 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 50 592 1 3 Walnut Street Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 109 62 9 L1 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 50 59 187 65 3 0 0 Ball Ave 50 50 125 635 0 0 West Street slo Chapman Ave 50 90 280 663 0 3 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 110 345 67 2 0 6 Orangewood AveJConvention Way 50 90 280 66 3 0 0 Convention Way Katella Ave 50 117 366 675 0 0 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 97 302 66 6 0 3 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 50 III 345 66 9 0 9 Harbor Boulevard slo Chapman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 718 0 5 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 715 0 6 Orangewood AveJConvention Way [PHONE REDACTED] 72 1 0 2 Convention Way Katella Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 73 0 0 5 Katella AveJFreedman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 727 0 4 Freedman AveJManchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 73 0 0 1 Manchester AveJI 5 [PHONE REDACTED] 729 0 0 I 5IBall Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 720 0 5 Ball Rd JVermont Ave 65 198 624 69 8 03 nJo Vermont Ave 57 171 538 69 1 0 3 Haster Street slo Chapman Ave 59 178 560 69 3 0 0 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 131 409 68 0 0 0 Orangewood AveJKatella Ave 60 166 516 68 4 0 7 Katella AveJManchester Ave 50 159 495 68 2 0 6 Manchester AveJI 5 50 139 431 67 6 19 Olive Street Ball RdJVermont Ave 50 50 63 60 5 1 3 e 0 4 Noise AlUllysis JBIOOSS CRA D ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson 5vecific Plan e TABLE D I continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feei Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Manchester Avenue Clementine St iHarbor Blvd 50 50 50 57 5 L7 Ball RdJI 5 50 50 140 64 0 25 Anaheim Boulevard 1 5 Cerritos Ave 62 173 538 68 6 0 8 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 59 172 538 68 9 L3 Ball RdJVermont Ave 50 131 409 67 7 16 Lewis Street s o Chapman Ave 50 108 342 67 9 LI Gene Autry Way Katella Ave 50 50 109 62 9 2 4 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 140 64 0 LI Cerritos AveJBall Rd 50 50 94 62 2 0 7 State College Boulevard 1 5 0rangewood Ave 100 302 950 7L1 0 6 Orangewood AveJGene Autry Way 100 302 950 71 1 0 8 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 2 0 Katella AveJHowell Ave 81 239 749 70 0 0 9 Howell AveJCerritos Ave 70 203 634 69 3 0 2 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 73 212 663 69 5 0 4 nio Ball Rd 81 239 749 70 0 0 0 The City Drive s o Chapman Ave 90 280 882 71 3 2 0 East Street Ball Rd Nennont Ave 50 54 171 64 9 0 4 Sunkist Street Howell AveJCerrilOs Ave 50 50 50 59 2 0 0 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 50 50 125 63 5 10 Ball Rd Nennont Ave 50 59 187 65 3 0 9 Interstate 5 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 691 1488 3204 84 2 2 4 Orangewood Ave Katella Ave 702 1511 3254 84 2 2 5 Katella Ave Ball Rd 695 1494 3218 84 2 2 5 nio Ball Rd 737 1587 3417 84 6 2 3 02043 e JB 0055 CRA D 0 5 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Soecific Plan e Roadway From To State Route 57 Chapman Ave Katella Ave Katella Ave Ball Rd TABLE 0 1 continued Distance From Roadway Centerline to CNEL in feet CNEL 50 feet from Centerline of the Near 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane [PHONE REDACTED] 1182 82 6 82 7 Increase Over Existing in dB OA OA Does not consider any natural or manmade shielding effects between sources and receptors Traffic noise levels within 50 feet ofthe roadway centerline require site specific technical review 2506 2544 Source Michael Brandman Associates 1994 e e lBiOOSS CRA D Noise Analysis L 0 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort STJecific Plan e TABLE D 2 YEAR 2000 F1RST STAGE PROJECT Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet From Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway FromlTo 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB EastlWest Arterials Ball Road wlo Euclid SI 61 185 581 69 5 0 0 Euclid StJLoara SI 71 219 689 70 2 0 0 Loara StWalnut SI 65 198 624 69 8 0 0 Walnut StWest St 86 266 839 71 1 0 0 West StJl 5 82 252 796 70 8 0 0 Harbor Blvd Anahein Blvd 83 246 774 70 2 0 0 Anaheim Blvd Olive St 89 273 860 70 9 0 0 Olive St East St 88 272 861 712 0 0 East St State College Blvd 84 259 818 710 0 0 State College Blvd Sunkist St 82 252 796 70 8 0 0 Sunkist StSR 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 7L9 0 0 Cerritos Avenue e wlo Euclid SI 50 50 152 63 6 0 0 Euclid StJ9th SI 50 50 109 62 2 0 0 9th StJWalnut SI 50 50 152 63 6 0 0 Walnut St West St 50 50 109 62 2 0 0 Anaheim Blvd Lewis St 50 50 125 63 5 0 0 Lewis St State College Blvd 50 50 63 60 5 0 0 State College Blvd Sunkist SI 50 50 63 605 0 0 Sunkist 57 50 50 63 60 5 0 0 Convention Way elo West St 50 50 50 57 5 0 0 wlo Harbor Blvd 50 50 50 59 2 0 0 Gene Autry Way Lewis College Blvd 50 74 233 66 2 0 0 Katella Avenue wlo Euclid SI 69 212 667 70 1 0 0 Euclid StJ9th SI 67 205 646 69 9 0 1 9th StWalnut 51 63 191 603 69 6 0 0 Walnut SIWest 51 [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 0 1 West StHarbor Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 71 7 0 0 Harbor Blvd Clementine SI III 338 1065 7L6 0 1 02045 e IB OO55 CRA D D 7 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e TABLE 02 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Clementine St lHaster St [PHONE REDACTED] 7L7 0 1 Haster St lManchester Ave O5 320 1008 713 0 1 Anaheim Blvd lLewis St O5 320 1008 7L3 0 0 Lewis St lState College Blvd 100 302 950 71I 0 0 State College Blvd lHowell Ave III 338 1065 716 0 0 Howell Ave lSR 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 726 0 0 SR 57 Douglas Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 72 2 0 1 Orangewood Avenue Euclid St l9th St 50 83 259 66 3 0 0 9th St lWest St 50 96 302 67 0 0 0 West St lHarbor Blvd 50 137 43 68 2 0 0 Harbor Blvd lHaster St 57 171 538 69 1 0 1 Haster St lLewis St 73 225 7 0 70 4 0 1 Anaheim Blvd lState College Blvd 96 300 947 716 0 0 State College Blvd lSR 57 88 273 861 712 0 1 Freedman Way Harbor Blvd lClementine St 50 96 302 61 0 0 0 Clementine St lHaster St 50 04 323 66 9 0 0 Howell Avenue State College B1vd lSunkist St 50 50 63 605 0 0 Sunkist St lKatella Ave 50 50 18 615 0 0 Chapman Avenue 9th StWest St 50 137 431 68 2 0 0 West St lHarbor Blvd 55 164 517 69 0 0 2 Harbor Blvd lHaster St 63 9 603 69 6 0 0 Haster St lLewis St 59 178 560 69 3 0 0 Lewis St lCity Dr 50 137 43 68 2 0 0 1 5 SR 57 75 232 732 70 5 0 0 North South Arterials Eucl id Street Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 59 78 560 69 3 0 0 Orangewood A ve lKatela Ave 7 2 9 689 70 2 0 1 Katella A ve lCerrilOs Ave 11 219 689 70 2 0 0 Cerritos A ve lBall Rd 11 219 689 70 2 0 0 Ball Rd lCrone Ave 67 205 646 69 9 0 0 Noise Analysis e 18 00SS cRA D D 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson 5vecific Plan e TABLE 12 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB 9th Street Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 50 50 94 62 2 0 0 Orangewood Ave lKatella Ave 50 50 125 635 0 0 Katella Ave lCerritos Ave 50 50 50 59 2 0 0 Walnut Street Katella A ve lCerritos Ave 50 50 109 62 9 0 0 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 50 59 187 65 3 0 0 Ball Rd lCrone Ave 50 50 125 635 0 0 West Street s o Chapman Ave 50 90 280 66 3 0 0 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 110 345 67 2 0 0 Orangewood AveJConvention Way 50 90 280 66 3 0 0 Convention Way Katella Ave 50 117 366 67 5 0 0 Katella A ve lCerritos Ave 50 97 302 66 6 0 0 Cerritos A ve lBall Rd 50 III 345 66 9 0 0 e Harbor Boulevard s o Chapman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 719 0 1 Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 715 0 0 Orangewood AveJConvention Way [PHONE REDACTED] 72 3 0 2 Convention Way Katella Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 73 1 0 1 Katella AveJFreedman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 72 7 0 0 Freedman Ave lManchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 73 1 0 1 Manchester Avell 5 [PHONE REDACTED] 729 0 0 1 5 Ball Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 72 1 0 1 Ball RdJVermont Ave 67 205 646 69 9 0 1 010 Vermont Ave 57 171 538 69 1 0 0 Haster Street s o Chapman Ave 59 178 560 69 3 0 0 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 137 431 68 2 0 2 Orangewood Ave Katella Ave 62 173 538 68 6 0 2 Katella AveJManchester Ave 50 159 495 68 2 0 0 Manchester AveJI 5 50 146 452 67 8 0 2 01 ive Street Ball Rd lVermont Ave 50 50 63 60 5 0 0 02047 e J8 OOll CRA D 0 9 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- r Anaheim Reson Specific Plan e TABLE D 2 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway FromlTo 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Manchester Avenue Clementine St lHarbor Blvd 50 50 50 57 5 0 0 Ball Rdl1 5 50 50 140 64 0 0 0 Anaheim Boulevard 1 5 Cerritos Ave 62 173 538 68 6 0 0 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 59 172 538 68 9 0 0 Ball Rd lVermont Ave 50 138 431 67 9 0 2 Lewis Street slo Chapman Ave 50 108 342 67 9 0 0 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave 50 50 109 62 9 0 0 Katella A ve lCerritos Ave 50 50 140 64 0 0 0 Cerritos Ave lBall Rd 50 50 94 62 2 0 0 State College Boulevard 1 510rangewood Ave 100 302 950 71 1 0 0 Orangewood Ave lGene Autry Way 100 302 950 71 1 0 0 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 0 0 Katella Ave lHowell Ave 81 239 749 70 0 0 0 Howell A ve lCerritos Ave 70 203 634 69 3 0 0 Cerritos Ave lBall Rd 73 212 663 69 5 0 0 nlo Ball Rd 81 239 749 70 0 0 0 The City Drive s o Chapman Ave 90 280 882 71 3 0 0 East Street Ball Rd lVermont Ave 50 54 171 64 9 0 0 Sunkist Street Howell Ave lCerritos Ave 50 50 50 59 2 0 0 Cerritos A ve lBalI Rd 50 50 125 63 5 0 0 Ball Rd lVermont Ave 50 59 187 65 3 0 0 Interstate 5 Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 693 1491 3211 84 2 0 0 Orangewood Ave Katella Ave 704 1514 3261 84 3 0 1 Katella A ve lBall Rd 696 1498 3225 84 2 0 0 nlo Ball Rd 739 1590 3424 84 6 0 0 e lBiOOSS cRA D D IO Noise Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- AfUlheim Reson Soecific Plan Roadway From To State Route 57 Chapman AveJKatella Ave Katella AveJBall Rd TABLE 02 continued Distance From Roadway Centerline to CNEL Iin feet CNEL 50 feet from Centerline of the Near 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane [PHONE REDACTED] 1182 82 6 82 7 Increase Over Existing in dB 0 0 0 0 b Does not consider any natural or manrnade shielding effects between sources and receptors Traffic noise levels within 50 feet ofthe roadway centerline require site specific technical review 2506 2544 Source Michael Brandman Associates 1994 02049 IB OOSS CRA D Noise Analysis 0 11 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Anaheim Reson Soecific Plan e TABLE D 3 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Haster StManchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 724 0 3 Anaheim Blvd lLewis SI [PHONE REDACTED] 720 0 9 Lewis StState College Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 0 6 State College Blvd lHowell Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 722 L8 Howell AveJSR 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 73 2 1 3 SR 57 Douglas Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 726 1 3 Orangewood Avenue Euclid St 9th SI 50 96 302 67 0 2 0 9th StWest SI 50 116 366 67 8 2 8 West StHarbor Blvd 50 144 452 68 4 2 1 Harbor Blvd lHaster St 63 191 603 69 6 3 0 Haster StLewis SI 75 232 732 705 6 3 Anaheim Blvd lState College Blvd 92 286 904 714 6 2 State College Blvd lSR 57 84 259 818 710 3 8 Freedman Way Harbor Blvd lClementine SI 50 126 388 67 2 2 7 Clementine St Haster SI 50 139 431 67 6 3 4 Howell Avenue State College Blvd lSunkist SI 50 50 109 62 9 1 4 Sunkist StKatella Ave 50 50 109 62 9 0 0 Chapman A venue 9th St lWest SI 50 137 431 68 2 0 0 West StHarbor Blvd 55 164 517 69 0 0 3 Harbor Blvd lHaster SI 63 191 603 69 6 0 0 Haster St lLewis St 59 178 560 69 3 0 0 Lewis StCity Dr 50 158 495 68 8 10 1 5 SR 57 59 178 560 69 3 0 6 Nonh South Arterials Euclid Street Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 65 198 624 69 8 0 7 Orangewood A ve lKatella Ave 75 232 732 70 5 12 Katella Ave lCerritos Ave 80 246 775 70 7 1 2 Cerritos Ave lBall Rd 80 246 775 70 7 11 Ball Rd lCrone Ave 71 219 689 70 2 0 9 02051 e JBOO55 CRA D 0 13 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan e TABLE D 3 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway FromlTo 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB 9th Street Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 54 171 64 9 2 7 Orangewood AveJKatella Ave 50 64 202 65 6 2 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 94 62 2 1 7 Walnut Street Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 140 64 0 L1 Cerritos Ave lBall Rd 50 89 280 67 0 1 7 Ball Ave 50 59 187 65 3 18 West Street slo Chapman Ave 50 124 388 67 7 L1 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 124 388 67 7 L1 Orangewood AveJConvention Way 50 131 409 68 0 17 Convention Way Katella Ave 55 164 517 69 0 1 5 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 131 409 68 0 L1 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 67 199 624 695 3 5 Harbor Boulevard slo Chapman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 719 0 6 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 715 0 5 Orangewood AveJConvention Way [PHONE REDACTED] 720 0 1 Convention Way Katella Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 73 0 0 5 Katella AveJFreedman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 722 I Freedman AveJManchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 724 5 Manchester AveJI 5 [PHONE REDACTED] 72 4 5 1 5 Ball Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 722 0 6 Ball RdJVermont Ave 75 226 710 70 1 0 6 00 Vermont Ave 65 192 602 694 0 6 Haster Street 5 0 Chapman Ave 71 219 689 70 2 0 9 Chapman Ave Orangewood Ave 65 198 624 69 8 18 Orangewood A veKaleIJa Ave 85 253 795 70 3 12 Kalella Ave Manchester Ave 71 206 645 69 4 0 6 Manchester Ave IS 65 186 581 68 9 0 6 Olive Street Ball Rd Vermont Ave 50 SO 78 615 2 3 e D 14 Noise Analysis lB OOll CA D ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Soecific Plan e TABLE D 3 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL SO feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Manchester Avenue Clementine StHarhor Blvd SO SO SO 59 2 0 0 Ball RdI 5 SO 59 187 653 3 8 Anaheim Boulevard 1 5 Cerritos Ave 77 226 709 69 8 0 4 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 71 212 667 69 8 05 Ball Rd Vermont Ave 61 178 559 69 0 0 3 Lewis Street s o Chapman Ave SO 94 295 67 3 0 5 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave SO SO 140 64 0 3 5 Katella A veCerritos Ave SO 59 187 653 2 4 Cerritos A veBall Rd SO SO 125 63 5 2 0 State College Boulevard e 1 5 0rangewood Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 714 0 9 Orangewood Ave Geoe Autry Way [PHONE REDACTED] 72 2 19 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 72 3 3 0 Katella Ave Howell Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 2 2 Howell Ave Cerritos Ave 89 266 835 70 S 1 4 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 94 284 893 70 8 17 0 0 Ball Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 L3 The City Drive s o Chapman Ave 90 280 882 71 3 2 0 East Street Ball RdVermont Ave SO 69 218 65 9 0 6 Sunkist Street Howell A veCerritos Ave SO SO 78 615 2 3 Cerritos Ave BaIl Rd SO 64 202 65 6 LI Ball RdVermont Ave SO 84 264 66 8 0 6 Interstate 5 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 734 1580 3403 84 6 2 8 Orangewood Ave Katella AVe 745 1603 3452 84 7 3 0 Katella Ave Ball Rd 727 1564 3368 845 2 8 nJo Ball Rd 766 1648 3548 84 9 2 6 02053 e IB OO55 CRA D 0 15 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort 5oeciic Plan e Roadway From To State Route 57 Chapman Ave lKatella Ave Katella Ave lBall Rd TABLE D 3 continued Distance From Roadway Centerline to CNEL in feet CNEL 50 feet from Centerline of the Near 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane [PHONE REDACTED] 1171 2498 2521 82 6 82 6 Increase Over Existing in dB 0 4 03 Does not consider any natural or manrnade shielding effects between sources and receptors Traffic noise levels within 50 feet of the roadway centerline require site specific technical review Source Michael Brandman Associates 1994 e 8100SS CRA D Noise Analysis 0 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan e TABLE D4 YEAR 2010 WITII PROJECT Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet From Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB EastlWest Arterials Ball Road wlo Euclid St 75 232 732 70 5 0 1 Euclid StJLoara St 96 300 947 716 0 1 Loara StWalnut St 90 280 882 71 3 0 1 Walnut StJWest St [PHONE REDACTED] 719 0 1 West StJl 5 [PHONE REDACTED] 72 3 0 1 Harbor Blvd Anahein Blvd 99 300 946 71 1 0 1 Anaheim Blvd Olive St [PHONE REDACTED] 716 0 1 Olive StJEast St [PHONE REDACTED] 719 0 1 East College Blvd 101 314 990 718 0 1 State College Blvd Sunkist St 92 286 904 714 0 0 Sunkist 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 724 0 0 Cerritos Avenue e wlo Euclid St 50 57 173 64 2 0 0 Euclid St 9th St 50 57 173 64 2 0 6 9th StWalnut St 50 64 195 64 7 0 0 Walnut StWest St 50 57 173 64 2 0 0 Anaheim Blvd Lewis St 50 64 202 65 6 0 0 Lewis College Blvd 50 54 171 64 9 0 4 State College Blvd Sunkist St 50 50 125 63 5 0 6 Sunkist 57 50 50 109 62 9 0 0 Convention Way elo West St 50 50 94 62 2 0 7 wlo Harbor Blvd 50 50 109 62 9 0 7 Gene Autry Way Lewis College Blvd 50 89 280 67 0 0 0 Katella Avenue wlo Euclid St 83 246 774 70 2 0 4 Euclid St9th St 79 233 731 69 9 0 4 9th StWalnut St 77 239 753 70 6 0 4 Walnut StWest St [PHONE REDACTED] 724 0 5 West StHarbor Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 72 2 0 4 Harbor Blvd Clementine St [PHONE REDACTED] 726 0 7 Clementine StHaster St [PHONE REDACTED] 734 0 9 e 02055 JB OOll CRA O 0 17 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort Soecific Plan e TABLE D4 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feeO from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway FromTo 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Haster StManchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 73 3 0 9 Anaheim Blvd lLewis St [PHONE REDACTED] 725 0 5 Lewis StState College Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 7L6 0 3 State College BlvdIHowell Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 725 0 3 Howell Ave lSR 57 [PHONE REDACTED] 73 5 0 3 SR 57 Douglas Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 72 7 0 1 Orangewood Avenue Euclid St l9th St 50 110 345 67 5 0 5 9th StWest St 50 130 409 68 3 0 5 West StHarbor Blvd 50 158 495 68 8 0 4 Harbor Blvd lHaster St 75 232 732 705 0 9 Haster StLewis St 86 266 839 71 1 0 6 Anaheim Blvd lState College Blvd 99 307 968 7 7 0 3 State College Blvd lSR 57 86 266 839 71 1 0 1 Freedman Way Harbor Blvd lClementine St 50 133 409 67 4 0 2 Clementine St lHaster St 50 146 452 67 8 0 2 Howell Avenue State College Blvd lSunkist St 50 50 109 62 9 0 0 Sunkist StKatella Ave 50 50 109 62 9 0 0 Chapman Avenue 9th StWest St 50 151 474 68 6 0 4 West StHarbor Blvd 57 171 538 69 1 0 1 Harbor Blvd lHaster St 65 198 624 69 8 0 2 Haster StfLewis St 61 185 581 69 5 0 2 Lewis StCity Dr 50 158 495 68 8 0 0 5 SR 57 59 78 560 69 30 0 North South Anerials Euclid Street Chapman Ave lOrangewood Ave 65 198 624 69 8 0 0 Orangewood Ave lKatella Ave 77 239 753 70 6 0 1 Katella A ve lCerritos Ave 80 246 775 70 7 0 0 Cerritos Ave lBall Rd 80 246 775 70 7 0 0 Ball Rd lCrone Ave 71 219 689 70 2 0 0 e D 18 Noise Analysis lIliOOSS cRA D ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Soecific Plan e TABLE D4 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerline to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway From To 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB 9th Street Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 54 171 64 9 0 0 Orangewood AveJKatella Ave 50 64 202 65 6 0 0 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 94 62 2 0 0 Walnut Street Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 50 156 645 0 5 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 50 94 295 67 3 0 3 Ball Ave 50 64 202 65 6 03 West Street slo Chapman Ave 50 131 409 68 0 0 3 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 50 137 431 68 2 0 5 Orangewood AveJConvention Way 50 144 452 68 4 0 4 Convention Way Katella Ave 61 185 581 69 5 0 5 Katella AveJCerritos Ave 50 137 431 68 2 0 2 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 67 199 624 69 5 0 0 e Harbor Boulevard slo Chapman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 72 3 0 4 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 72 1 0 6 Orangewood AveJConvention Way [PHONE REDACTED] 73 1 1 Convention Way Katella Blvd [PHONE REDACTED] 73 9 0 9 Katella AveJFreedman Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 73 1 0 9 Freedman AveJManchester Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 73 1 0 7 Manchester AveJI 5 [PHONE REDACTED] 73 1 0 7 1 51Ball Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 72 5 0 3 Ball RdJVermonr Ave 81 246 774 704 0 3 nlo Vermont Ave 69 205 645 69 7 0 3 Haster Street slo Chapman Ave 77 239 753 70 6 0 4 Chapman AveJOrangewood Ave 73 225 710 704 0 6 Orangewood Ave Katella Ave 95 287 903 70 9 0 6 Katella AveJManchester Ave 77 226 709 69 8 0 4 Manchester AveJI 5 69 199 624 69 2 0 3 01ive Street Ball Rd Vermonr Ave 50 50 78 6L5 0 0 02057 e JBOO55 CRA D 0 19 Noise ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Resort 50ecific Plan e TABLE D 4 continued Distance From Roadway CNEL 50 feet Increase Centerl ine to CNEL in feet from Centerline Over of the Near Existing Roadway FromlTo 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane in dB Manchester Avenue Clementine StJHarbor Blvd 50 50 50 60 5 L3 Ball Rd I 5 50 59 187 653 0 0 Anaheim Boulevard 1 5lCerritos Ave 79 233 731 69 9 0 1 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 75 226 710 70 1 03 Ball Rd Vermont Ave 63 185 581 69 2 0 2 Lewis Street slo Chapman Ave 50 94 295 67 3 0 0 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave 50 50 140 64 0 0 0 Katella A veCerritos Ave 50 64 202 65 6 0 3 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 50 50 125 635 0 0 State College Boulevard 1 510rangewood Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 71 5 0 0 Orangewood Ave Gene Autry Way [PHONE REDACTED] 723 0 1 Gene Autry Way Katella Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 723 0 0 Katella Ave Howell Ave [PHONE REDACTED] 71 3 0 0 Howell Ave Cerritos Ave 89 266 835 70 5 0 0 Cerritos Ave Ball Rd 97 293 922 70 9 0 1 nlo Ball Rd [PHONE REDACTED] 715 0 1 The City Drive s o Chapman Ave 90 280 882 71 3 0 0 East Street Ball RdVermont Ave 50 69 218 65 9 0 0 Sunkist Street Howell A veCerritos Ave 50 50 78 615 0 0 Cerritos AveJBall Rd 50 69 218 65 9 0 3 Ball Rd Nermont Ave 50 89 280 67 0 0 2 Interstate 5 Chapman Ave Orangewood Ave 746 1606 3458 84 7 0 1 Orangewood AveJKatella Ave 754 1622 3493 84 8 0 1 Katella AveJBall Rd 731 1574 3389 84 6 0 1 nlo Ball Rd 777 1673 3603 85 00 1 e J8IOOSS CRA D 0 20 Noise Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Anaheim Reson Soecific Plan Roadway From To State Route 57 Chapman AveJKatella Ave Katella AveJBall Rd TABLE D4 continued CNEL 50 feet from Centerline of the Near 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Travel Lane Distance From Roadway Cemerline to CNEL in feet [PHONE REDACTED] 1178 2498 2536 82 6 82 7 Increase Over Existing in dB 0 0 0 1 Does not consider any natural or manmade shielding effects between sources and receptors Traffic noise levels within 50 feet ofthe roadway centerline require site specific technical review Source Michael Brandman Associates 1994 02059 IS OO55 CRA D Noise Analysis 0 21 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e APPENDIX E CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT ---PAGE BREAK--- e I APPENDIX E CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT e e ---PAGE BREAK--- u On j i Archaeological Inventory Mai IIlf AGclr1 A dlaeoklFcal IIliotlIIaIlon c n UClA 01 1os7 MIlN1ZIII 01 ClIItun1 HlIlot1 MAY 1 8 LaI CA I5 lO c J a1nrdJ 19tJ J FAX Z1S0Zf 4 Resional COooeo In orznation C ter c May 22 1991 Steven Gerhar4t Mich l Br n nan A ocietel 606 South Olive Street Suite 600 Los Angells CA 90014 R ReCord earch for the Disneyland Expans on Specific Plan and the C rcial Aria Orangl County Califomia D ar Mr Gerhardt AI plr your reque t of May 1 1991 we haVI condUCted an arehalological record arch of thl aJove referenced projece This documlnt earch included a revi of all recorded hi eoric and prlhi toric archaeological itl in the vicinity as well as a revi of all known cul tura1 nt ource survey and excavation rlporu In addition hAve our file of hi toric maps regarding this region DUI to the Inlitive naturl of archalological sitl locacions ar not nIHive are are delimited by black scate trinomi ls li ted Surveyed are s cros hatChing The e documents revlaled cultural resource relea ed 1n tead ewall with relevsnt are indicated by red PRHISTOIIC RESOURCES No prehhtodc ites hAve been idlntified within a I mile r diuI of the lubject arias II incloled IIlP a1Il lilt HISTORIC AZSOCKCZ llo historic I1t havI b en ideneified within a OIl mil rcHu of ehe lecc arlal 1 ncloled up and 1 i c of cur historic Upl An he 18 and 1 62 IS eril indicat an u an are with Ic ceure aAd permanlnt rO 1 in pl ce s early al 11 Much of ar wa apparently used al orchar4a in 1 62 PREVIOUS AJtCHAEOLOGICAL Seven survey have been conducted Within a one mil radlu of che ub lce alal S I enclOled IIlP and bibll09raphy 110 pert of the parle or the recreation area ha been proviou ly urveyed ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 I UCOMMINDA fION8 Our ottice reccmmen th t when uainq thia information for s eciUc pro ect plann nll purpoaea at M rd halt work cOMition hould Ie in eftect in the ev nt th t 11 cur l reaourc e re i cCIY rld uriJlcr any coc truction urth r proj ct chat includ ex ion of the park cucdde the current Dilneyland Iounc1 ry ahould inclu e an hi8torical evaluation of properties that may be impacted The propereiel houle be eval uatee again t criteria tor peldble includen in the National Regi ter of Hiatorie Placea If you have any qu tiona r garding our r ults or t he recommendations pr nted hereiJl Pl teel tr to concact cur otfic ac 2131 825 1 80 e Invoice re mailed approximately two week aft r recorda se rche Thi will allow your Urm che opportUJlity to request further information und r the ame invoice n r Pl r f rence the invoic number lilted b low when making inquire Itequuta lIl de aft r invoicing will nee lsitate a aeparat invoic with a 10 00 handling fe Sh ll y Marie Gomea Staff ArCha ologiet Incloeure Xl X I I I I I Xl NaP 1109r phy 1t ale Sic record lu Y report II2V01ce 3173 SO A 1 be ---PAGE BREAK--- t F LE coPY THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN Volume ITa Draft Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR No 313 State Clear1nghouse No 91091062 City of Anaheim June 1994 A U5t I qq Y Reflect El rttf4M hne f lll ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan SP92 2 City of Anaheim JUDe 1994 AugJs Iqcj If f Prepared for TIiE CI1Y OF ANAHEIM Center P O Box 3222 Anaheim Cal1fomla 92803 Contact Tom Wood [PHONE REDACTED] On August 29 1994 the City of Anaheim Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan SP92 2 and the errata provided in the August 29 1994 Staff R ort to the Planning Co mission Prepared by TIiE SWA GROUP 580 Broadway Suite 200 Laguna Beach Cal1fomla 92651 Contact Bob Jacob [PHONE REDACTED] 02088 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Plan Table of Contents Section 1 0 Executive Summary 1 1 1 1 Purpose of the Specific Plan 1 3 12 OrganJzation of the Specific Plan Document 1 3 1 3 Setting 1 4 1 4 implementing the General Plan 1 5 1 5 Project Goals 1 5 1 6 Summary of the Development Plan 1 6 1 6 1 Land Use 1 6 1 6 2 Development Density 1 7 1 6 3 Development Standards and Guidelines 1 9 1 6 4 Development Summary 1 9 17 implementing the Specific Plan 1 9 Section 2 0 Planning Context 2 1 2 1 Purpose ofthe Plan 2 3 2 2 Specific Plan Policies 2 3 2 2 1 Create and Enhance an Urban Destination Resort Environment 2 4 2 2 2 Establish a Unified Resort Identity 2 4 2 2 3 Supply Visitor and Convention Facll1ties to Meet Long Term Demand 2 4 2 2 4 Improve Public Facll1t1es Services and Infrastructure to Accommodate Growth 2 5 2 2 5 Improve the Transportation System 2 6 2 2 6 Develop Implementation Mechanisms to Assure Quallty Development 2 6 2 2 7 Enhance and Protect Surrounding Uses 2 7 2 3 Authority and Scope ofthe Spec1ftc Plan 2 7 2 4 Relationship to City Plannmg Documents and Regulations 2 8 2 4 1 Relationship to the General Plan 2 8 2 4 2 Relationship to Zonlng Ordinance 2 9 2 4 3 CEQA Requirements 2 9 2 4 4 Relationship to The Disneyland Resort Plan and Environmental Impact Report EIR 2 10 2 4 5 Relationship to the Hotel Circle Plan 2 10 Section 3 0 l4nd Use Plan 3 J 3 1 Regional Location 3 3 3 2ExIsting Cond1tions 3 4 3 2 1 The Plan Area 3 4 3 2 2 ExIsting Uses 3 4 3 3 Land Use Plan 3 8 3 3 1 Bastc Land Uses 3 8 3 3 2 Mobllehome Park MHP Overlay Zone 3 11 3 3 3 CoR Distr1ct Development DensIty 3 11 3 3 4Development Standards 3 15 3 4 Phasing 3 17 Section 4 0 Public FacUlties Plan 4J 4 1 Regional CIrculation Programs 4 3 4 2 Regionai Infrastructure Programs 4 4 4 3 Vehicular Circulation Plan for the ADahellD Resort 4 6 4 3 1 Connections to Interstate 5 4 6 4 4 ADahe1m Resort Arterta1 Secondary System 4 10 4 5 Transit Plans 4 30 4 5 1 The Disneyland Resort Projects 4 30 4 5 2 Future Orange County Transit Improvements 4 30 4 5 2 1 Central Orange County Fixed Guideway Project 4 30 02067 Page ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Table of Contents 4 5 2 2 and HOV Lane System h hh h h h hh 4 30 4 5 2 3 Expanded OCTA Bus Service h h h h 4 31 4 5 2 4 Intercity Commuter Rail Service h h 4 31 4 6 Pedeslrtan Circulation Plan h h h h h 4 31 4 7 Water h h 4 33 4 8 Sanitary Sewer 4 35 4 9 Storm Drain h h 4 39 4 10 Electricity 4 39 4 11 Natural Gas h h 4 41 4 12 Telecommunlcatlons h 4 42 4 13 Television Service h h 4 42 4 14 SoUd Waste 4 42 4 15 PubUc Services h h 4 43 Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 1 5 1 Design Plan Objectives h h h h h 5 4 5 1 I Create Visual Continuity Between the Spec1flc Plan Area and the Adjacent DISneyland Resort Plan Area h h 5 4 5 1 2 Create a High Quallty Visually AppeaUng Pedestrian Oriented EnVIronment 5 5 5 13 Create Landscape and Design Standards and Regulations to Reinforce the Area s Identity hh h h hh h 5 5 5 2 Design Concepts h h h h 5 5 5 2 1 Transform and Unify with Landscape 5 6 5 2 2 Create aDIStr1ct with a CIvic Scale 5 6 5 2 3 Emphasize the Landscape on the PubUc Streets 5 6 5 2 4 Orient Visitors Visually h 5 7 5 2 5 Create aRecognizable Center for the Anaheim Resort 5 7 5 2 6 Coordlnate Streetscape Improvements with other Improvements 5 7 5 2 7 Establish a Clear Destgn Hierarchy 5 8 5 3 Landscape Concept Plan 5 8 5 3 1 Landscape Concepts 5 9 5 3 1 1 Unity and DIversity 5 9 5 3 1 2 Use Plant Material to Create Scale 5 9 5 3 13 Establish aRecognizable Streetscape Geometry 5 10 5 3 1 4 Deftne aPlant Palette 5 10 5 3 15 Layer Landscape to Create Depth 5 11 5 3 1 6 Contrast Plant Material for DIversity and Balance 5 11 5 3 17 Colorful Plants to EmphasiZe a festM Atmosphere 5 12 5 3 2 Plant Materta1 Selection and Use 5 12 5 3 2 1 Bas1c Selection CrIteria 5 12 5 3 2 2 Tree Selection and Use CrIteria 5 13 5 3 2 3 Sbrub Vine and Ground Cover Selection and Use CrIteria 5 15 5 3 3Layered Landscape DesIgn CrIteria 5 16 5 3 41ndscape Concept DIagram 5 18 5 3 5 Landscape Cross Sections 5 18 5 4 Identity Concept Plan 5 30 5 4 1 Identity and Sign Concepts 5 30 5 4 1 1 Re1nforce the Landscape Character of the Anaheim Resort 5 30 5 4 12 forms to be Traditional In Appearance 5 31 5 4 13 Integrated Sign Program Directs Visitors Eftlc1ently 5 31 5 4 14 ConsIStent Color System 5 32 5 4 15 Night LIghting to Create afestiVe Atmosphere 5 32 e Page II ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan OJ Table of Contents 5 4 2 Identity Elements 5 32 5 4 2 1 Gateways 5 32 Freeway Gateways 5 33 Arterial Road Gateways 5 33 5 4 2 2 Lighting Fixtures and Street Pageantry 5 35 5 4 2 3 Street Furniture 5 35 5 4 3 Sign Elements 5 36 5 4 3 1 Vehicular Directional Signs 5 36 5 4 3 2 Pedestrtan Directional and Informational Signs 5 38 5 4 3 3 Private Signs Freestanding Monument Signs 5 38 5 5 Design Criteria for the Public Realm 5 40 5 5 1 Interstate 5 and the Major Interchanges 5 41 5 5 2 Arrtval Gateways 5 43 5 5 2 1 Harbor Boulevard North Gateway 5 43 5 5 2 2 Harbor Boulevard South Gateway 5 44 5 5 2 3 Katella Avenue East Gateway 5 44 5 5 2 4 Katella Avenue West Gateway 5 44 5 5 3 The Public Streets 5 45 5 5 3 I Harbor Boulevard 5 45 5 5 3 2 Katella Avenue 5 46 5 5 3 3 West Street Disneyland Drive 5 47 5 5 3 4 West Street south ofKatella Avenue 5 48 5 5 3 5 Freedman Way 5 49 5 5 3 6 Clementine Street 5 50 5 5 3 7 Manchester Avenue 5 51 5 5 3 8 Walnut Street 5 52 5 5 3 9 Ball Road 5 53 5 5 3 10 Anaheim Boulevard Haster Street 5 54 5 5 3 1 I Convention Way 5 55 5 5 3 12 Pac11lco Avenue 5 55 5 5 3 13 Orangewood Avenue 5 56 5 5 3 15 Local Streets 5 57 5 6 Design Criteria for the Setback Realm 5 58 5 6 1 Exterior 5 58 5 6 2 Freestanding Sign Guidelines and Standards 5 60 5 6 2 1 General Sign Standards 5 60 5 6 2 2 Freestanding Monument Sign Requirements 5 61 5 6 2 3 Multi tenant Signs 5 63 5 6 2 4 Landscape Wall Identity Signs 5 64 5 6 2 5 AutomoUYe Servtce StaUon Sign Standards 5 64 5 6 3 Setback Realm Guidelines for the Central Core 5 66 5 6 3 1 Central Core SUe pl g Guidelines 5 67 5 6 3 2 Arch1tectural Guidelines 5 67 5 6 3 3 ClrcuJatlon and GuidelInes 5 68 5 6 3 4 Special Intersection 1 dKape 5 69 5 6 3 5 Landscape 5 70 5 6 3 6 Exterior Lighting 5 71 5 6 4 Setback Realm Guldellnes for Areas Outside the Central Core 5 71 5 6 4 1 Site Guidelines 5 71 5 6 4 2 Arch1tectural GuidelInes 5 72 5 6 4 3 ClrcuJation and GuidelInes 5 73 5 6 4 4 Landscape Guidelines 5 73 02089 Pageili ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Table of Contents 5 6 4 5 Lighting Guidel1nes h h h h 5 73 5 6 5 Interior Setbacks h h h h h 5 73 5 6 5 1 Interior Setbacks Between Adjacent nonresidential properties 5 74 5 6 5 2 Interior Setbacks Adjacent to Residential Uses h 5 74 5 6 6 Landscape Requirements h hh h 5 75 5 6 6 1 Tree Density h h h hh 5 75 5 6 6 2 Tree Density to Vary According to Adjacent Use 5 75 5 6 6 3 The Tree Density Factor h h 5 75 5 7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm h 5 79 5 7 1 OrganiZation Realm Design Standards and Guldel1nes 5 79 5 7 1 1 Guidel1nes vs Standards h h 5 79 5 7 12 Types of guldel1nes and standards h h 5 80 5 7 1 3 Applicability 5 80 5 7 2 General Site h 5 80 5 7 2 1 Guldel1nes and Standards h 5 80 5 7 3 Theme Park Back of House Servlce Areas h 5 81 5 7 3 1 Guldel1nes and Standards 5 81 5 7 4 Servlce and Loading Areas h h 5 81 5 7 4 1 Guidel1nes and Standards h h h h 5 82 5 7 5 Exterior Lighting 5 83 5 7 5 1 Guidel1nes 5 83 5 7 6 Surface Parking Areas h 5 84 5 7 6 1 General Parking GUldel1nes and Standards 5 84 5 7 6 2 Parking Area Design 5 85 5 7 6 3 Parking Lot CIrculation 5 85 5 7 7 Parking Structure Appearance 5 86 5 7 7 1 Guidel1nes and Standards 5 86 5 7 8 Building Appearance 5 88 5 7 8 1 Building Massing 5 88 5 7 8 2 Building Mater1aIs and Colors 5 89 5 7 8 3 Building Equipment 5 91 5 7 8 4 Color 5 91 5 7 8 5 5 91 5 7 9 Signs 5 92 5 7 9 1 Purpose 5 92 5 7 9 2 General Sign Guidel1nes 5 92 5 7 9 3 Americans with DIsabilities Act ADA Standards 5 94 5 7 9 4 Wall or Building Sign Standards 5 94 5 7 9 5 On Site Dlrectlonal SIgn Standards 5 96 5 7 9 6 WlDdO llll Sign Guidel1nes and Standards 5 97 5 7 10 a pe 5 98 5 7 10 1 Site dscape Guldel1nes and Standards 5 98 5 7 10 2 Surface Landscaping Guidel1nes and Standards h 5 98 5 7 10 3 Design 5 99 5 7 10 4 Pedestrian Pavtng Guldel1nes 5 100 5 7 10 5 Landscape Wall and Fence Guldel1nes and Standards 5 101 5 7 10 6Irr1gauon Guldel1nes and Standards 5 101 5 7 10 7 Landscape Maintenance 5 102 e Page Iv ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Table of Contents 5 8 Design Plan Reference Summary 5 103 5 8 1 Full Street Reference Plan and Cross Sections 5 104 5 8 2 Half Street Reference Plan and Cross Sections 5 132 5 8 3 Plant Selection Matrix 5 165 Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 J 6 1 General Community Objectives and Policies 6 3 6 I1 General Community Objective I 6 3 6 12 General Communtty Objective 2 6 4 6 13 General Community Objective 3 6 4 6 14 General Community Objective 4 6 4 6 2 Land Use Element 6 5 6 2 1 Commercial Areas Goals and Policies 6 5 6 2 2 Communtty SelV1ces and Fac1litles Goals and Policies 6 8 6 2 3 Infrastructure Goals and Policies 6 8 6 3 Circulation Element 6 10 6 3 1 Goal and Policies 6 10 6 4 EnVIronmental Resource and Management Element 6 13 6 4 1 Goal and Polley 1 6 13 6 4 2 Goal and Polley 2 6 13 6 5 Safety and SeismiC Safety Element 6 14 6 5 1 PrImary Safety Goal 6 14 6 5 2 Goal and Policies FIre Prevention 6 14 6 5 3 Goal and Polley GeoIOgiC Hazard 6 14 6 5 4 Goal and Polley Flood Hazard 6 15 6 5 5 Goal and Polley DIsasters 6 15 6 6 Housing Element 6 15 6 6 1 Goal and Polley Housing and Neighborhood Quality 6 15 6 7 Noise Element 6 16 6 7 1 Goals and Policies 6 16 6 8 Growth Management Element 6 18 6 8 1 Growth Management Goals and Policies for Land Use 6 18 6 8 2 Growth Management Goals and Policies for Community SelV1ces and FacUlties 6 21 6 8 3 Growth Management Goals and PoliCies for Infrastructure 6 23 6 8 4 Growth Management Goals and PoliCies for Circulation 6 26 6 8 5 Growth Management Goal and Polley for Parks and Open Space 6 31 6 8 6 Growth Management Goal and Policies for AJr Quality 6 32 6 9 Parks Recreation and Community SelV1ces 6 33 6 9 1 Goal and Policies 1 6 33 6 9 2 Goal and PoUc1es 2 6 34 Section 7 0 Zoning Development Standards 7 J 18 48 010 PURPOSE AND INTENT 7 3 18 48 020 GENERAL PROVISIONS 7 3 050 Structures and Uses 7 4 18 48 030 DEFINITIONS 7 5 010 K Words Terms And Phrases 7 5 020 G Words Terms And Phrases 7 5 030 H Words Terms And Phrases 7 5 040 N Words Terms and Phrases 7 5 050 P Words Terms And Phrases 7 6 060 S Words Terms And Phrases 7 6 070 T Words Terms And Phrases 7 6 080 U Words Terms And Phrases 7 6 02071 Page v i e e ---PAGE BREAK--- i The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Table of Contents e 18 48 040 020 060 18 48 050 18 48 060 18 48 070 030 060 110 120 18 48 080 18 48 090 18 48 100 18 48 110 18 48 120 18 48 130 020 18 48 140 18 48 150 18 48 170 18 48 180 18 48 190 METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECnnC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 7 6 FlnaI Site Plan Review and Approval 7 6 Master Planned Developments 7 8 DEVELOPMENT AREAS 7 8 LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS C R DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT DENSITY AREAS 7 8 LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMERCIAL RECREATION C R DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 7 9 Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 7 9 Prohibited Uses 7 13 Required Site Screening 7 17 Landscaping 7 19 LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSPUBLIC RECREATION PR DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AREA 2 7 20 MOBILEHOME PARK MHP OVERLAy 7 20 CENTRAL CORE 7 21 OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 7 21 REQUIREMENTS FOR VACATION OWNERSHIP RESORT 7 23 SIGN REGULATIONS 7 26 SIgns General 7 30 APPLICATION FEES 7 39 DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS 7 39 PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS 7 40 AMENDMENTS CONDmONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES 7 40 NONAPPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER TO CITYACTMTIES OR PROPERTY 7 40 Section B Zoning Explanation tJl 8 1 Purpose 8 1 8 2 Basic Pr1ndples 8 3 8 2 1 ProvIde More Detall and Greater 8 3 8 2 2 Streamline Review of Hotel Motel Projects 8 3 8 3 Land Use 8 4 8 3 1 Central Core 8 4 8 3 2 Development Dens1ty 8 5 8 4 Development Standards 8 5 8 4 1 Setbacks 8 6 8 4 2 Landscape 8 7 8 5 SIgDa 8 5 8 5 1 SJgD Standards 8 9 8 5 2 CoonI1Dated SJgD Program 8 9 8 5 3 Perm1tted S1gPs 8 9 8 5 3 1 Informational Regulatory and D1rect1onal lRD SigDS 8 9 8 5 4 CODdit1oDal1y Permitted SigDS 8 9 8 5 4 1 ChaDgeable Copy S1gPs 8 9 8 5 5 Prohibited S1gPs 8 10 8 5 6 Sign Standards MatrlX 8 10 8 5 6 1 Freestanding SigDS 8 10 8 5 6 2 Window Ident1ftcation SigDS 8 11 8 5 7 AutomotIVe Service Station SigDS 8 11 e Page vi ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Table of Contents 8 5 8 Sign Illumination 8 12 Section 9 0 Legal Description 91 9 1 Area 1 9 3 9 2 Area 2 9 4 9 3 Area 3 9 6 9 3 1 Excepting Hotel Circle Area 9 6 9 4 Area 4 9 7 9 5 Area 5 9 8 9 6 Area 6 9 8 Section 10 0 General Plan Amendment 10 1 10 1 Introduction 10 3 10 2 Land Use Element 10 3 10 3 Circulation Element 10 5 10 4 Environmental Resource and Management Element 10 10 02073 Page vii e e ---PAGE BREAK--- Th Anahelm Ileaort Plan List of Exhibits e Section 1 0 Executioo Summary 1 1 EJthIblt 1 70An0helm Rescrt SpeclriePlan District Development Summall u 1 10 ExhIbIt 1 7oTheAnahelm Rescrt Specific Plan Development Su nmaI lPlan 11 ExhIbIt 1 7cC R Development DensI1y Summall Tabciaffon 12 ExhIbIt 1 7d C R DIstrictDevelopment Density Plan 1 13 Section 2 0 Planning Context 2 1 Section 3 0 und Use Plan 3 1 ExhIbIt 3 1a Reg1onal Location Map 3 3 ExhIbIt 3 2 laThe Anaheim Resort Specific Pian Anaheim Rescrt Boundartes 35 EJthIbIt 3 2o Aer aI Photograph wf1tl the Anaheim Plan and Anaheim Rescrt Boundat1es 3 6 ExhIbIt 3 22t EJdsItnQ Land Use 37 ExhIbIt 3 3 lo Development Plan 39 ExhIbIt 3 3 2a Mob ehome Perle MPH Ovel1ayZone 3 12 EJthIbIt 3 3 3o C RD strIct Development Density SlInmOll Tabulation 3 13 ExhIbIt 3 3 3b C RD strIct Development Density Plan 3 14 Exhibit 3 3 4o Central Core 3 16 Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan 4J ExhIbIt 4 1o EJds1fng Circulation System 4 5 ExhIbIt 4 3 lo nterstate 5West street Dlsneytand Dtfvelnterehange as Shown In The Dlsneyjand ResortSpecIfIc Plan 4 7 ExhIbIt 4 3 b 4 Jterstate 5 KatelaAvenue Interchange as Shown h The DIsneyland ResortSpecific PIon 4 9 ExhIbIt 440Vehlcular CIrculation Plan 4 1 ExhIbIt 4 4b Propal9d West street DWleyland Dttve Plan Nor1h of Sa Road 4 12 ExhbIt4 4c I roposed West street DIsneyland Dttve C10ss Section Between Katella Avenue and Centtos AverxNJ 4 13 ExhbIt4 Sou1tl of Katella Avenue C10ss Section 4 13 44 Propa edWestPlace Ooss Section Forrnerty Soutt1 of Ball Road 4 14 ExhIbIt 4 4f Proposed Freedman Way Plan East of Clementine Street 4 15 ExhbIt 4 4g mterlm Katela Avenue stween Inhmtate 5and West street Dlfneyjand Dtfve Ooss SectIon 4 16 ExhbIt44h Uttmate KateIIa Avenue Ooss Section Between htelstate 5 and West street DlsneY 01 4 16 ExhbIt 44I Uftmate KateIa Avenue Cross Section Between Wahut street and DIsneyland Drtve 4 17 ExhbIt 44f Proposed Walnut street Cross Section 4 18 ExhbIt 44 t Propor 1Hatbor BatJevord C10ss SectIon Orangewood to Manater Avenue on the East SIde and OanQewood10 1 250 Feet Soutt1 of Manchester Avenue on the West SIde 4 19 ExhbIt4 41 Hatbor BoUevotd C10ss Section Between ManchesterAvenue on the Eaf SIde and 1 250 feet Soutt1 of Ma chesterAvenue on the West Side to the ht tt 5 4 19 ExhbIt 4 4m f ropo dHarbor BoUevard C Iss Section htetstate 5Nor1tl 4 20 ExhbIt441 1 Ptopo dSol C10sss ction Westof WestRoc 4 21 ExhbIt4 40 I ropc edBaI RoarJ Closs SectIon s West Place and Inters10te 5 4 21 ExhIbIt 4 f ropoIed Sol RoarJ C10ssSection Eaf of htelstate 5 4 21 ExhbIt44Q O nenIIne Iss SectIon 4 22 ExhbIt4 1l Hoster street AnaheIm BoUevadC10ss Section 4 22 ExhbIt4o JstIng eom nttonWay C10sss ctlon 4 23 ExhbIt44t Futtse PacIfIco Avenue Betweerl Hatbor BoUevard andHaster street Ooss Section 4 24 ExhbIt 44u f ropoMK1 Manchestet Avenue West PcrtIon C Iss SectIon 4 25 ExhbIt 4 4v f ropoM1d Manchestef AI 8IlU9 Ac facent to htetstate 5 NorIh of Aho Way C10ss Sectton 4 25 ExhbIt 4 4w PropoMKJ ManchesterAvenue Sou1tl PcrtIon Cross SectIon 4 26 ExhbIt 44Jt PropoMKJ Manc M18rAVeflU9 Adjacent to htetstate 5 Soutt1 ofKatella Avenue Ooss Section 4 26 e Pogeill ---PAGE BREAK--- TM Anaheim Resort Specific Plan List of Exhibits Exhibit 4 4y Orangewood Avenue Cross Section 4 27 Exhibit 4z ProposedLocal Street Alro Way Cross Secffon 4 27 Exhibit 4 4ao Proposed Local Street Coso Vista Cross Section 4 28 Exhibit 4 4ab Proposed LocalStreet Ox Road Cross Secffon 428 Exhibit 4 4ac Proposed Local StreetVermont Avenue Cross Section 429 Exhibit 4 4ad Propos d Local Street Zeyn Street Cross Section 4 29 Exhibit 4 60Pedestrlan ClrcuJaffon 4 32 Exhibit 4 7 Wafer System Improvements 4 34 Exhibit 4 8 Sewer System Improvements 4 36 Exhibit 4 Sewer System De Jclencles and Recornrn inded Improvements for Year2010 4 38 Exhibit 4 9ostorm Droln System Improvements 40 Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 1 Exhibit 5 3 1 lo andDIversity 510 Exhibit 53 Jo Loyered Landscape Design Criteria for Praper1les wfft1 Frontages Greater thor13OO Feet 5 17 ExhIbit 53 3ot oyered Landscape Design Criteria for Proper1 Frontages Less ftJan 300 Feet 518 Exhibit 53 Jc Layered Lardscape Setback Crlterla 5 19 Exhibit 53 4o Landscape Concept Diagram forAnaheim ResortPublIc Reolm 520 Exhibit 53 5a Landscape Cross Section A Harbor 8ou1evard Between Manchester Avenue and OrangewoodAvenue 521 Exhibit 5 3 5Ir Landscape Cross Section 8 Harbor Boulevard Between 5 and VermontAverMJe 521 Exhibit 5 3 5c LondscapB Cross Section C Kate a Avenue 522 Exhibit 5 3 5d Landscape Cross Secffon D Wahut Street 522 Exhibit 5 3 5Lardscape Cross Section E DIsneyland DrIve North of 8011 Road 523 ExhIbit 5 3 5f andscape Cross Sectfon F West Street Dlsneytond DrIve North of Katela Avenue 523 Exhibit 53 ardscape Cross Section G 80 Road 524 ExhIbit 5 35tl andscape Cross Section H Clementfne Street 524 fxhIbt 53 5Iardscape Cross Sectfon I Freedman Way 525 ExhIbit 53 5jl ardscape Cross Sectfon J Orang8wcod Avenue 525 fxhIbt 5 3 Sk andscape Cross Section K Avenue Westand MIdPortIons 526 Exhibit 53 Cross Sectfon L Mt 1ncIw1ster AV lU8PortIonsadJacent to 5J 526 fxhIbt 5 3 5rn Landscape CrossSectfon M PacJt1co Avenuebetween Harbor 80Uevard and Hoster Avenue 527 ExhIbIt 53 5n Lant Jscape Cross Sectfon N Cotwentfon Way 527 ExhIbIt535o Cross Sectfon 0 AnaheIm 80IJevaeJlHasterstreet 528 EJIhIbIt 5 3 5p Cross Sectfon P 528 EJIhIbIt 5 3 5q Landscape Cross Sectfon Q LDcaf streets Arla Way Coso VIsta Ox Road VermonfAvenue andZeyn street 529 fxt1IbIt 5 4 2 1 Locattan Plan 5 34 fxt1IbIt 54 3 0 1l tJInQ SIgn DesIQn CrtterIa 5 39 fxt1IbIt 5501he Pr bIc RtIaIm s 42 fxt1IbIt 55 310 kxbar 80uIevaeJ In the Pr bIcRealm 8etwHn ManaterAvenue and Avenue 5 45 fxt1IbIt 5 5 3 1b labor8culevaeJ In thePl DIc Realm North of Inter Jtote 5 5 46 fxt1IbIt 553 AI 8I lIMIn the Pl DIc Realm 5 47 fxt1IbIt 553 30 VI l In the Pl North of 8aI Road 5 47 fxt1IbIt 553 W l Myland Dttve In the Pl Between Avenue andKateIO Averx e 5 48 ExhIbIt5 5 3 4a West In the PublIcR Jm SOu1tl of Kote laAvenue 5 49 535o 4reer Jman Way East of Street In the PublIc Realm 5 49 fxt1IbIt 5 53tlo street Ir1thePl DIc1 I8ahI Mthout ap MJ1 way People Maver MOvhQ SIdewoII System In MedkIfI Page x 02075 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan List of hibits Exhibit 5 53 6b Clemennne street In the PubUc Realm wIttl aPotential Pedestrian Way People Mover Moving SIdewalk System In Median North of katella Avenue 550 ExhIbit 55 3 7a Mancflester Avenue Westand North Portions 551 ExhIbit 5 5 3 7lManchester Avenue Portions Adjacent to Inttate 5 552 Exhibit 5 5 38o WatJut street In the Public Realm 553 ExhIbit 5 5 3 9o BalI Road East of West Place In the Public Realm wiPointedMedian 553 ExhIbit 5 5 3 9t Ba1 Road West Place to Walnut Street In the Public Realm wi Landscaped Median 554 ExhIbIt 5 53 100 Anahelm BouIeVOfd Haster Street In the PublIc Realm 554 ExhIbit 5 5 3 lla Convenffon Way In the PublIc Realm 555 Exhibit 55 3 120 P0cflco A19nue In the Pt bllc Realm between Harbor Botievard and Hasterstreet 5 56 Exhibit 55 3 13o Orangewood Avenue In the Public Realm 556 ExhIbIt55n 556 ExhIbIt553 150Typcal Local Street Arlo Way Coso VIsta Street Ox Road V9l7l1Ont Avenue and Zeyn street 557 ExhIbit 5 5 3 151Typcal Local Street West Place 557 Exhibit 56 1o LocollZe Ligtlting Effects 558 ExhIbIt5 The SetbackRealm 559 Exhibit 5 6 2 2o S1gn Atea Determined by street Frontage fX 2 ExhIbIt 5 62 2t Layout of SIgn Copy 5 63 ExhIbit 5 624o Landscaped WafSIgn 5 64 ExhIbIt 5 6 25o Gas Station PrIcing Informatfon 5 65 ExhIbIt 5 630 Basic Antral Core DesIgn es 5 66 Exhibit 56 3 10 Pfoce ParlcIng Facllties at the rearof the lite 5 67 ExhIbIt 56 3 3o curb cuts 5 6B ExhIbIt 56 33b ConsoIIdate curb cuts 5 6B ExhIbIt56 33d Um t porlIon ofe vatton devoted to parIdnQ area entries 5 69 ExhIbIt56 3 3c NlITlber of Curb Cuts per Lot 5 69 ExhIbIt5634o SpecJa ntersecffon Landscap Treatment 570 Exhibit 56 5 2a 1ter1or Setbacksadjacent to Relldentlal Use 574 ExhIbIt 5 6 630Tree Density Factor Plan 578 ExhIbIt 5 7 9 aI stgn Atea 595 ExhIbIt 5 7 9 Wal5Ign Atea for Lea1han Two Stor e 595 ExhIbIt 5 7 94cWaf 5Ign for Bulc l1lfP Less Than Two S1l lIt s 595 ExhIbIt 5 7 9 6a iJmItAtea of Wh10w SIgns 597 ExhIbIt5 B la Fu1Street Ooss Section Reference Plan 5105 ExhIbIt58 1b arbor BouIevad Northoflnt8lSfate 5 FUI Street CrossSecnon 5106 ExhIbIt5B lc Harbor Boulevard Between Intetrfate 5 and Monchester AverxJe on the East SIde and 15Oto250 tSouthofMalchesterAvenue on the West SIde FiJI Street cross SecIIon 5 107 ExhIbIt 5 B ld labor BouIevad Between OronQewood Avenue and Manchester AverxJe on the East SIde and 150 to 250 tSoutf1 of Manchester AverxJe on the West SIde FUlStreet cross SectIon 5 108 ExhIbIt5Bl KDte1a A East of West street D lneyland Dttve FciI street Cross SectIon 5 109 ExhIbIt5 8 1f KDM1a A East of West Street Dllneyland 0rIw FUl5traet Ooss SectIon 5 110 ExhIbIt58 Ig V ahA Street Full Street Cross SectIon 5 111 ExhIbIt58 1 loVMt 5frNt Dllneyland Dttve Nortf1 of Sol Road FuII tCrossSection 5 1 12 ExhIbIt 58 1 8efWNn Centtos Awmue and Kote la Avenue FcilStreeI 0 SectIon 5 113 ExhIbIt 58 1 w t StreetSouth of Ka1lJI a A FUI street cross Sec1Ion 5 114 ExhIbIt 58 1rw stPlaceCl kJe Soc FuII t Ooss Section 5 115 ExhIbIt 5 8 11 Ba1RoadWestof West Place FciI street Cross Sec1Ion 5 116 ExhIbIt 58 lm Bo1Rood Fli StreelCross Sec1Ion 5116 ExhIbIt58 1n 8011 Rood East of West Place Fu115traet cross Section 5 117 ExhIbIt 5 8 1o C1ernen11ne Street and Manchester Avenue Full Street Ooss Section 5 117 ExhIbIt 5 8 lp Oernen11ne street FIJI street Cross Sec1Ion 5118 ExhIbIt 58 1 eedmon Way FuII t Cross Sec1Ion 5119 e Page xi ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan List ofExhibits Exhibit 5 8 lr Anahelm Boulevard HasterStreet Full street CrossSection 5 120 Exhibit 5 8 Is Convention Way Full Street Cross Section 5 121 Exhibit 5 B 1t Poclnco Avenue Between Harbor Bo ievard and Haster Street Future Proposed Fil Street Cross Section 5 122 Exhibit 58 1U Orangewocd Avenue Cross Section 5123 ExhIbit 5B lv Monchester Avenue West and Mid Por1fons Fil Street Cross Section 5 124 Exhibit 5B lw Manchester Avenue Portion Adjacent to 1 5 Freeway North of Arto Way Full Street Cross Section 5 125 Exhibit 5 8 lx Monchester Avenue Portion Adjacent to 5 Freeway South of Kotello Avenue Full Street CrossSection 5 126 Exhibit 5 8 1 Hocal Street Alro Way Full Street Cross Section 5 127 Exhibit 5 8 1z Loccl Street Coso Vls10 Street Full Street Cross Section 5 128 Exhibit 5 8 1oo 1ocol Street Ox Rood Cross Section 5 129 Exhibit 5 8 1ab iocol Street Vermont Avenue Full Street Cross Section 5130 ExhIbit 5 8 1oc Local StreetZeyn street Fulstreet Cross Section 5 131 ExhIbit 5 8 2o Hotf street Cross Section Reference PIon 5 133 Exhibit 5 8 2t Holf Street Cross Section 30 Kotello Avenue interim Condition with 1Ive Travel Lanes 5 134 Exhibit 5 8 2cHotf Street CrossSection 3b Kotena Avenue UItfmote Condition with Four Travel Lanes 5 135 Exhibit 5 8 2dHoIf Street Cross Section 6 Harbor Boulevard Between Orangewood Avenue to Manchester Avenue on the East SIde and 150 to 250 feet South of Manchester Avenue on the WestSIde 5 136 ExhIbIt 5 82 tf Street Cross Section 8 Harbor Boulevard Between Manchester Avenue on the East Side and 150 to 250 feet South of Manchester Awmue on the West Side and the 15 Freeway 5137 ExhIbIt 5 8 2fHoIf Street Cross Section 10 OIsney orld Drive Between Katella Avenue and Centtos AWIflUlI 5138 ExhIbIt 5 8 2rr Hctf street Cross Section 13 Kotelo Avenue Between DIsneyland DrIve WalnutStreet ummote condition 5 139 Exhibit 5 8 2lHoIf street CrossSection 21 Walnut Streel 5 140 ExhIbIt 5 8 2Ho1fstreet Cross SectIon22 Anaheim BouJevad Hoster Avenue 5 141 ExhIbIt 5 8 2Ho1fstreet Cross Section 23 Ba Rood Westof West Place 5 142 Exhibit 5 8 2k street Cross SectIon 28 interior Property IJne Setback AcJjocent to Other Cornmerclol Zones 5 143 ExhIbIt 5 8 Cross Section 2Ba WestPfoce ca cSoc 5 144 ExhIbIt5 8 2m f o1f Street Closs SectIon 30 5145 ExhIbIt5 8 2n CrossSection 31 Way 5 146 ExhIbIt 5 82 Street Cross SectIon32 Oementlne Street 5 147 ExhIbIt5 8 2p f o1f Street Cross SectIon 33 Welt Street Southof KoteIo AWIflUlI 5 148 hIbIt 5 8 street Cross Sectton 340 Avenue West Porlipn 5 149 ExhIbIt 5 8 2r4o f street Cross SectIon 340 Awmue PortIon Southof Aio Way 5 150 ExhIbIt5 8 street Cross SectIon 350 Avenue PortIonAdjacent to Intetltote 5Nortn ofAlto Way 5 151 ExhIbIts a n J Cross Section 35b Avenue PortIon Ad OCMlt to IntoIt 5South ofKDMIo Awmue 5152 ExhIbIt s a 2u af5treet Cross SectIon SetbodcAdjocent to Intemate 5 5 152 ExhIbIt s a 2v CmaSectIon 36 In Setbodc Adjocent to 1n1elsto1e 5 5 153 ExhIbIt s a 2l Closs SectIon 37 Hotbor 80uIevard North ofInfets10te 5 5154 ExhIbIt s a 2x Cross SectIon39 Quo tJod Avenue 5155 ExhIbIts a 2y 5155 ExhIbIt 5 B22 Cross Section 40 D lneyland Drlve north ofSol Rood5156 ExhIbIt5 B 200 Cross SectIon 4I BaI RoodEast of WestPlace 5 157 ExhIbIt582Gb IIoIfstreet Cross SectIon 43 FI8eGtnon Way South SIde ofIlIgnt fWay 5 158 ExhIbIt582oc Cross Section 440 Locd street Am Way 5159 ExhIbIt 582od IoIfstreet Cross SectIon 44b LoooI 5treet co oItsto str t 5160 ExhIbIt58208 IafStreet Cross SectIon 441 Localstreet Ox Rood 5161 ExhIbIt5 B 2of4o f street Cross SectIon 44d LoooI street Vermont Avenue 5162 Page xii 020n e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim hsorI Specmc Plan List ofExhibits Exhibit 5 B 2agHaIfstreet Cross Section 44e Local Street Zeyn Street 5163 ExhIbit 5 B2 1f street Crass Section 45 Pacifico Averue Between Harbor Boulevard ancl Hosterstreet 5164 ExhIbit 5B Tree Selection Matrix 5 167 ExhIbIt5B 3tShni line ancl Ground Cover Matrix 5 16B Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 Section 7 0 ZOning Development Standards 7 1 ExhIbIt 7Oo PermItted SIgn Standards Matrix 7 42 ExhIbIt 7OI Hate Matel Sign Stanclards Matrix 7 44 Section 8 0 ZOning Explanation 8 J e Exhibit B 40 An0he m Rescrt Comparison 8 Section 9 0 lAgal Decription 9 ExhIbIt 9 Ia LegaI Description Areas 95 Section 10 0 General Plan Amendment 101 ExhIbIt IO 3o C1ty of Anaheim Ger eral Plan ExistIng Circulation Element Plan lCk ExhIbit 10 3b C1ty of Anaheim Ger eral Plan Amended Circulation ElementPlan 1 7 Exhibit 103c Exceptians Ust to Arterial Highway Rights of Way 1 9 ExhIbIt 104o CIty of Anaheim General Plan ExistIng Environmental Resources ancl ManagementElement Plan 1 11 ExhIbIt IO4I CIty of Anaheim General Plan Proposed EnvironmentalResourcesand Management Element Plan 1 12 e 02078 PoQe xiii ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary 02079 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Reaort specmc Plan Section 1 0 Executir le Summary e 1 1 purpose of the Specific Plan 1 2 Organization of the Specific Plan Document e The purpose of the Anaheim Resort Plan Is to pro vide a long range comprehensive plan for future develop ment of approximately 549 5 acres the 1046 acre Anaheim Resort which Is generally located adjacent to and southwest ofInterstate 5 To achieve this the Spec1fic Plan establishes an overall Identity and land use plan which Is Intended to maximize the area s potential guide future de velopment and ensure abalance between growth and infra structure The Plan additionally Includes zoning and development standards desJgn guidelines a streetscape program and apublic facWties plan which de scribe bow the Plan s goals and objectives will be reallzed The Plan will permit the development of hotel convention retail and other visitor serving uses as well as the infra structure will be needed to support fu ture development The Anaheim Resort as the term Is used In this Sped1lc Plan refers to an area deSignated for Commercial Recre ation land uses on the CityofAnaheim General Plan anoth er area designated Commercial Recreation aroundAnaheim Stadium ts not apart of theAnaheim Resort The term Ana helm Resort Plan area refers to the 549 5 acre por tion regulated by this document The Plan Is divided Into ten sections Section 10 the Executive S nY ts abriefoverview of the proposed plan SecUon 2 0 the Context discusses the pur pose of the Specific Plan the City policies that ai fect development ofthe Specific Plan area theauthority and scope of the Sped1lc Plan and Its relationship to otherCity documents Section 3 0 contains the Land Use Plan and describes exIStingland uses and conditions the SpedfIc Plan area and describes the proposed land uses and development densities SectIon 4 0 contains the Public FacWties Plan In Section 5 0 the Design Plan estab lishes the design criteria for the Specific Plan area Section 6 0 General Plan ConsIStency describes how the Sped1lc Plan Is consIStent with the Clty s General Plan Section 7 0 contains the detailed Zoning and Development Standards that will regulate development within the SpecI1lc Plan area Section 8 0 compares thedevelopment standardscontained In the Plan to ex1sting City regulations Section 9 0 con tains alegal description of the Sped1lc Plan area Section 2080 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anohelm Resort Pion Section 1 0 Executiue Summary l 1 3 Existing Setting I I j I The Anohem R ttSpeck Pion Area ho Jfld ona the Anohem Resort Bounaone no e ft1Is rnatg ntJlaQlam hoW existing sf 01oth er rnatg n a ogtoms toUQ lOUl e show p Onnec1 OI gntT1etIfs Page 4 10 0 contaJns General Plan Amendment No 333 In the Ft nal Plan the appendix will contain the resolution approvtng the Plan and the conditions of approval Fold out maps located In theback document show a larger scale Development Summary Plan and CoR District Development Density Plan For Informational pU foses the City s adopted Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area ax Imum Permitted Structural Height Map is also I ed at the back document c re du ed opy of The Anaheim Resort Specl1lc Plan area Is locatedwithin the Anaheim Resort aportion of the City ofAnaheim specially designated by the City s General Plan for recreation and tourtst convention related activities along with related us es The Anaheim Resort itself contaJns approximately 1 046 acres The Anaheim Resort Plan area Is depleted In the diagram In the margin and Is generally located south west ofInterstate 5 between the West Street Ball Road in terchange and Orangewood Avenue though a portion Is located north of the Interstate 5 Harbor Boulevard inter change The Anaheim Resort Plan area encompass es approximately 549 5 acres and Is currently zoned CoR Commercial Recreation PR Publlc Recreational and RS A 43 OOO Residential Agricultural A few of the parcels also have the MHP Mobllehome Park Overlay desJgnation Adoption ofthe Anahelm Resort SpecIflc Plan Plan No 92 2 would replace the current zanlng designations with the SpecIflc Plan CoR DIstrict PR District and MHP Overlay zoning designations for the project area Itwould also replace and supercede the CoR Zone reqUIrements In Chapter 18 48 of the Anaheim Munldpal Code In addition to thls SpecIflc Plan plAnning efforts have been underway far the r 496 5 acres ofthe Anaheim Re sort On June 29 1993 the CIty ofAnaheim adapted The DIsneyland Resort SpecIflc Plan SpecIflc Plan No 92 1 to provide for the development of an International multi day vacation destiDation resort encompa ITlg approximately 489 7 acres of the Anaheim Resort This Plan the development ofa new theme park additional hotels and en tertalDment areas new facl11ties and an Internal transportation syatem In addition the Plan the ex Sung DlsDeylaDd theme park to continue to be modlfled with new attractioDS and other Improvements Although e 02081 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 1 0 Execut Summary e 1 4 the General Plan 1 5 Project Goals e they are separate projects theAnaheim Resort and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plans have been prepared to complement one another by incorporating s1m1lar zoning and development standards streetscape and slgnage pro grams and Infrastructure Improvements for the overall en hancement of the Anaheim Resort The Hotel Circle Specific Plan Is currently under consideration by the City for the re 6 8 acres of the Anaheim Resort Itwould provide for the development of a total of M96 hotel roomswithin two existing hotels and three new hotds 61l 211 e istin 100 prcf d The Anaheim Resort Speci1lc Plan Implements the Clty s General Plan byaddressing the pertinent goals policies and objectives of the General Plan ThIs Speci1lc Plan Is being processed concurrently with amendments to the Land Use Circulation and Environmental Resource and Management Elements of the General Plan which are discussed separately in th TFal Plg A I IR1 tIt 1 3 dii t 1 Section 10 0 ofthis Spec11lc Plan A complete discussion of the relationship between this Specific Plan and the Anaheim General Plan Is found In Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency Especially relevant to development of the Anaheim Resort Speci1lc Plan are the following General Plan Policies To maintain and encourage Anaheim s position as a na tionally recognIZed tour1st convention and recreation cen ter To Increase sales tax yields and further enhance the eco nomic base of the community thereby lessening the tax burden on real property To encourage the development ofqual1ty faclUtles which complement conventions family entertalnment and recre ation within appropriate areas ofthe community and To maintain the Integrity of the Commercia Recreation Area now referred to as theAnaheim Resort by permitting only compatible land uses within thisdesignated area These General Plan policies wtll be Implemented through the following overall goals of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan To foster the growth of the Clty s economic potential by re vltal1zIng the Anaheim Resort To treat all landowners and users In the Anaheim Resort 02082 Page 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary 1 6 Summary of the Development Plan Pemlffed Land U Hotels Motels SetvIng Retal 1Iestaurants tc Conventtan and ling Ent tU Page 6 falrly wh1le recognizing the economic and social needs of the entire City To ensure that development complements the Clty s in vestment In theAnaheim Convention Center and other area resources and Interests To maintain and enhance existing recreation and conven tion oriented land uses To protect adjacent residential land uses by buffering them from potential land use Impacts associated with de velopment of the Anaheim Resort To maintain or enhance tra1llc and circulation In and around the Anaheim Resort To proVIde convenient access to all hotel restaurant and retall opportunities In the Anaheim Resort to enhance the area wide tourist experience To protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from un necessary intrusion by vehicles traveling to and from the Anaheim Resort To accommodate potential future regtonal transportation networks Into the Plan To proVIde for necessary public Infrastructure and servic es to m nnml e the development potential of the Anaheim Resort To createacoherent unique resort Identity thatreinforces the Anaheim Resort s image as ahigh quality destlnation resort To establish ahigh quality pedestrian enVIronment and To Improve the aesthetic character ofthe Anaheim Resort by VIsually c1H1n T1g the boundaries with approprtate land scape treatments The Development Plan establishes the basic framework for land use and development standards which will govern de velopmentafthe Specl1lc Plan area Itdefinesthe permitted uses development density building setbacks building heights and other design standards that will be complied with by lnd1V1dual p u rtyowners and developers when building new or renovating existing projects 1 6 1 Lancl Use The land uses permitted within the SpecI1lc Plan area w1lI be consistent with the overall goal ofm nnm ng the area s potential wh1leestabll hlng an overall identity The prima ry Intent IS to provide for the needs ofvisitors to the area s 02083 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan e I I Development Areas C II Ught shOCled area PII Clark shaded area I I MobI ehame Park O 11ay e Section 1 0 Executiue Summary attractions Consequently uses are prJmarjy those which by their nature are related to tourism and en tertainment The 317 6 acre CommercIal Recreation C R DIstrIct De velopment Area I which encompasses the entire Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area except the Anaheim Convention Center area proVIdes for the development of hotels motels convention and conference fac1lltles as well as restaurants retail shops and entertalnment uses Since the uses are orl ented towards entertainment retail uses such as neIghbor hood shopping centers wID not be permitted In addition to discourage use ofautomobUes drive through restaurants and other slm1lar uses wID not be This Includes properties currently zoned CoR Commerctal Rec reation and RS A 43 000 Resldenttal Single Family These properties wID be redestgnated to the CoR un der this Specl1lc Plan Further the C R Zonlng which Is set forth In Chapter 18 48 ofthe Anaheim Code wID be replaced and superceded by this Spec1fIc Plan There are also two properties In the south eastern portion and one In the north portion of theC R whichcurrently have a MobUehome Park MHP Overlay Zone designation The MHP Overlay requlrements which are set forth In Chapter 18 92 ofthe Anahelm Code are Intended to pro VIde development standards for mobUehome parks and to mltigate relocation problems and adverse deets of dis placement upon mobUehome owners when apark Is con verted to another land use These parcels wID continue to have the MHP Overlay designation under this Spec1fIc Plan The 62 8 aae Public Recreation PR DIStrict lOe ldopment Area 2 encompasses the City of Anahelm Convention Cen ter and associated complexes and the 1 600 room Anahelm Hllton Hotel which currently have aPublic Recre ational PR Zone designation The purpose of the PR Zone which Is set forth In Chapter 18 86 of the Anahelm MunlC lpal Code IS to preserve regulate and control the orderly use of CIty owned property and adjacent prlvate property This designation wID continue for this area under the Spe cl1lc Plan 1 6 2 Development Density Because ofthe location of the plann1ng area In an urban setting the at which particular areas are developed 2084 Page 1 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary I I C R Development DeNftY Varies on Infrastructure Pro Im Iyto Attractions ana Re Oton tllp to Surrounding Uses r de n4tions ba dzdt d d el rm I 1 11t nqSf I level 1 i l lttI r I d th iIte oltI MDilI Ib j cusot 11Ie II 1ftI lvt I1UtLlj uoU l naklk d f9trtl l u1 rJIlof M of DIle 1 0 1 c D ref m r4 1 c oo 4 51 iUt siJ d f pujJ p1 Cp 0e 0 4 c SI vU r bf dNf 1 P laII 1 iWl ld onAJlj 1lI4 mnet s L 1 lI S 1 U Js ic1 trafli B ld t6tf t s DliaJd II tS s nDf 11II Mk I tf e gH er oJlSC pet h tIS lJ rJttu J d JI th f I l iefM nu J fl rpriK 0 Fi Gf J Page 8 Is an Important consideration In particular the and availability of Infrastructure such as vehicular access water and sewer capacity and storm drainage facll Itles Is the determJnant for the future development potential of the Specific Plan area In addition proxlm1ty to the area s attractions and the to surrounding land uses was considered e In response to these factors the Plan establ1shes four den s1ty categories In the CR District l l l d tu huu I 111Uld 1 19p Vtl n 8UlS 913 l88 Ad Wt4 t tea y twhich will help assure that development ofthe area will be compatible with proposed Infrastructure and with the goal to protect surrounding residential uses The rfour density categories establ1shed by the plan are Low Density which has amaximum density of up to 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever Is greater Low Me dliun DensIty up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms I whichever Is greater Medium Density up to 100 rooms I per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever Is greater and Con i ventlon Center CCI Medium DenSity up to 125 rooms per gross acrewlth B n ellleIl11l a8W to ther of 100rooms gross acre or 75 rooms whichever Isr eat er tol ip erlerAiOfl clWA lVj nc The areas With the Low DensIty designation are generally 10 cated where planned future Infrastructure Improvements will not support more Intense development or which are further tram the area s attractions Areas With the Low Me dlum and Medium DensIty designations are located where planned future Infrastructure w11l be sufllc1ent to accom modate these more Intense levels of development and which are cloeer to the main attractions ofthe Anaheim Re sort Areas Immediately adjacent to the Anahe1lD Conven tion Center have the Convention Center Medium destgDation In that guests at these hotels typl cally do not have automobiles and therefore place fewer demands on area streets one ofthe most Important infra structure factors which tends to 1m1t development denSIty In recognition ofthe extenstve existing development Within the Anaheim Resort the Plan contalnS provisions which permit existing hotels motels to renovate or rebuild at the denSIty existing on the date ofadoption of the Anaheim Re sortSped1lc Plan even tCthedensity exceeds the maxtmum e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anallelm Resort Specmc Plan Section 1 0 Executi Summary 1 I I I I Co Special Development StondordJ 101 the Central COle 1 7 Implementing the Specific Plan by the density category In which the property Is located 1 6 3 Development Standards and Guidelines In addltion to regulations which will govern development density the Development Plan contains development stan daTlIs which regulate building mass and setbacks from property lines The Plan also contains regulations which de fine required landscape treatmenls both within the public right of way and In required setbacks as well asguidelines for site plann1ng service area design fac1l1ty de sign building appearance signs and other landscaping In recognition of the Imporlance of the Harbor Boulevard and KateUa Avenue corridors to the Identity of the entire Anaheim Resort theplan establishes spec1al standardsand guldelJnes for the central portion of the Anaheim Resort This area known as the Cenlral Core encompasses lots or parcels In the Speci1Ic Plan area with frontage on Harbor Boulevard between Interstate 5 and Orangewood Avenue and on Katella Avenue between Walnut Street and Haster Street Anaheim Boulevard 1 6 4 Development Summary The maps and accompanying tables on the following pages snmm rtze the Development Plan for the Anaheim Resort SpecI1lc Plan The Development Snmm TY Plan shows the local1on ofthe two development areas the Central Core and the Mobllehome Park Overlay It Is accompanied by a table that snmm r1zes the Development Plan The CoR DIstrict Development Density Plan shows the four density areas of the CoR District It Is also accompanied by atable that sum martzes the DWdmum permitted Bet l lIlvt 1 1 11II 1 The sketches dlagrams and plans Included In this SpecI1lc Plan are Intended to convey the overaJl design Intent of the Anaheim Resort SpecI1lc Plan As Indlvidual properties are developed addll10nal site pIAnntl1g design review and ap proval will be required prtor to the Issuance ofbuilding per mits In order to convey the design Intent of the Plan the trees and other plants shown In sketches and cross sections have been drawn to show their sizes at maturity 2086 Page 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Development Summary Districts of Way Land Use Approximate Acreage Commercial Recreation C R Hotel motel restaurant and other vls 317 6 District Development Area 1 Itor uses Public Recreation PR DIs Anaheim Convention Center and ac 62 8 Development Area 2 cessory uses hotel uses 1 5 Freeway Widening Area Land designated for 1 5 Freeway wld 15 1 enlng within the Specific Plan Area Public RIght of Way Land deslgnated for the public 154 0 of way within the Specific Plan Area TOTAL 549 5 MobUehome Park MHP ExIsting MobUehomes 315 Overlay In the CoR District Approxlmately 15 1 acres of the Anaheim Resort Spec1ftc Plan area are designated for future 1 5 Freeway of way Until such time as this land Is acqulred by Caltrans It will be subject to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone C R District and the density designat10ns summarized In Exhibit 1 7c C R District Development Density Plan Tab ulation and shown on Exhibit 1 7d C R DIstrict Development Density Plan Plans showing the properties a1lected by the 1 5 Freeway widening are onme with the City Pub lic Works Engineering Department Exhibit loAnanem Resort Specific Pion D Development Summary Page 1 10 02087 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e I I e The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary r t t 1 11 t J HI hJ l s hti i i il J Lr i r I 1 I L L i 1 r 1 i if i f vYt4nc he tcr il c A I I 1 I lll JI T nFf i1 i J i tl i irl I ui l r r1 T j il I i iit f i I 1 r t II fac oA 1 1 Ii 1 L I AYfnut CJ Tu rlL Ir i g H ill i f Ji I J I I I u Ii I r I r LJ il U L The Anaheim Plan Anaheim California Legend r LrnIl 01 Anaheim Resort DesIgnated lor Future ExtensIOn In General Plan Ckculo1ton Eiemenl CoR DevelOpmenl Area 1 Development Summary Plan EB o 100 2lXXl I 02088 PR Develapmenl Area 2 Deslgnaled Future AlIgnmenlln General Plan Ckculo1ton Eiemenl oed 0 errtlos Avenue abe reiOCaled UXXllo 1 100 nortllerty aporllan 01 Wesl SIr r beCome 0cu c West Place p nU ExIl DllI 7t The AnaheimReSOt1 SpecIfIC PIOn DevelOpmenl Summary PIOn In C nnutlOl Llt The Oi neJ lN olt lt sor SpeLtt illloll T MobIehome Pork MHP Overlay Zone wtIllln IIle C R OtsIrlCl CenlTOl Core Page ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary CoR District Development Density Summary Tabulation Density Designation Low Maximum Approximate Density Acres roUnded Up to 50 714 rooms acre Up to 75 1716 rooms acre Up to 100 19 2 rooms acre Up to 125 55 4 rooms acre 317 6 25 496 Existing Maximum Hotel Hotel Motel Motel Rooms Rooms 1926 3 777 4 523 12 [PHONE REDACTED] 2 719 6 926 Low Medium Medium Convention Center CC Medium 9 590 Total The maxlmum density for each lot or parcells the number ofhotel motel rooms acre noted In this table or 75 rooms per lot parcel existing on the date ofadoption of the Anaheim Resort SpecUlc Plan Is greater For parcels that are developed wtth hotel or motel rooms exceed the maxlmum density designation the number of rooms existing on the date of adopUOn of the Anaheim Resort SpecUlc Plan may be rebuilt or modl1led at their existing density Due to the enhanced ulumate of way required by adopted General Plan Amendmenl No 331 for Harbor Boulevard 12 feell Katel1a Awnue 23 feell Freedman Way 11 112 feetl and West Street DIsneyland Drtve north of Ball Road 10 feet and between CemtosAvenue and Katel1a Avenue 2 112 feell to Implement the Public Realm streetscape program prop erties along these streets may Include the addlUOaal of way In their jlloperty acreage when computing density The maxlmum number ofhote1 motel rooms Includes the existing 507 room Pan Hotel lYi S or o cl Ar S LS Tbe l ana twl L 1 or these hotel motel rooms shall be mJugated to the equtva1ent of 100 rooms per aere 9tOSS Summary of Designations for the 1 5 Future Widening Right of Way Area U rooms acre 190 Low Medium Up to 75 rooms acre 7 7 579 Medium Up to 100 rooms acre 3 6 360 Total 15 1 1 129 I 7c C R D SIllct Development Density SlIMlOtY TobU OlfOl l Page 1 12 02089 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary 01 Anaheim Resort DesIgnated lor Future Extension in General Pion Ckculotlon Element low Density Up to 50 Hotel Rooms Gross Acre Of 75 rooms whichever Is grealer low Medium Density Up 10 75 Holel Rooms Gross Acre or 75 rooms whichever Is grealer Medium Density Up to 100 Holel Rooms Gross Acre or 75 rooms whichever Is grealer Convention Center Medium Up 10 125 Hotel Rooms Gross Acre or 75 rooms whichever Is greate 1r hOlUtOI tcr n WIth RAI llm vi mitigated to the 01100 rooms per acre L vQ lent Page 1 13 ok j 1 y 0 I J rii 0 C T lTr I I c r m r c C L 1 t L l 1 j 1 ii a i 11 J C A I IJr j J i 11 ill il Ai 1 iji L b 11 p I 1 i hi H rL iii JL i l r LG l U r I r i i i L i f Ii i I Hif Lg Ii i1 S l u II i U u I JlOteIaACIIQrW IWnl lMC1lOn wlOItnII IO s c1lOn 0 I JelOtec l 4 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim California Legend L CoR District Development Density Plan M lJlI M tt EB o 2000 feet Ibid Deslgnaled Future Alignment In General Pion ClrculotiOn Element cerrIIOS Avenue will be relocafed UXXllo 1 100 reet northerly 0 portion 01 West Street wUI become 0cu desoc West Ploce ExhOlt 1 7d C R D Development Density Pion ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Speellle Plan Section 1 0 Executive Summary 02091 Page 14 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e The Anaheim Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context e ---PAGE BREAK--- TIle Anaheim Relart Speellle Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context 2 1 Purpose of the Specific Plan The Anaheim Resort theme parks convention facilities and visltor uses such as hotels Isaunlque type of land use concentration that requires speclal consid eration and attention to ensure that the various elements come together to create an exciting attractive environment The unique synergy a destination resort must have Is not easUy addressed by traditional zoning Because of this It Is necessary to estabUsh a basic framework which provides plann1ng poUcles and assure that visltor facilities and themepark uses will come together as an Integrated whole ThIsSpecific Plan Is Intended to estab lish this framework thereby ensuring an attractive destina tion resort environment In addition to overall planning poUcles the Specific Plan es tabUshes comprehensive zoning reguJatlons and design guidelines which recogntze the distinctive nature of tourist and convention oriented uses and eflectlvely Implements the poUcles ofthe Specific Plan It also Identifies the pubUc facilltles and services that will be needed to support the de velopment and describes how the project and Its related Improvements will be phased The zoning regulations contained this Specific Plan In Section 7 0 Zonlng and Development Standards are regulatory In nature Subsequent development plans and subdivision maps must be consistent wtth both this Speclf Ic Plan and the City ofAnaheim General Plan Any situation or condition not specifically covered by provisions con tained this Specific Plan will be subject to the regu lations ofthe City ofAnaheim Code 2 2 Specific Plan Policies The Specific Plan goa1s stated In Section 1 4 define the basts for the following Specific Plan pollcles They Include Enhance the urban destination area and create a resort development EstabUsh a unified resort Identity Supply adcquale VIsItor and convention to meet the long term demand for entertainment convention lodg Ing and retail uses pubUc services and Infrastructure to ac commodate projected growth the transportation system 020s3 Page 23 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Speelfie Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context e Develop Implementation measures to assure that the area will be enhanced by high quality development and Protect and enhance surrounding uses The follOwing subsections describe these pollcles in more detail 2 2 1 Create and Enhance an Urban Destinaflon Resort Environment The primary planning polley for the Anaheim Resort Specif ic Plan Is to enhance an urban destination area and create aresort envtronment that features theAnaheim Convention Center hotels restaurants and shopping and entertain ment opportunities By enhancing this area visitors will be encouraged to stayfor several days and enjoy the variety of recreation and entertainment opportunities avallable 2 2 2 Establish a Unified Resort Identity In order to establish the Identity of the Anaheim Resort as apremiere destination resort the Spec1flc Plan proposes that aun11 ytng theme be established throughout the Spec1f Ie Plan area ThIs will be achieved by establishing a consis tent visual language for the public areas that extend throughout the Specl1lc Plan area The main components of the un11 ytng visual language will be character and quality of the landscape signage and street furnishings The character and quality of the proposed will be regulated through acombination of set back requirements contained In Section 7 0 Zonlng and Development Standards and design guidelines contained In Section 5 0 DesIgn Plan of the Spec1flc Plan The land scapecharacter ofthe Sped1lc Plan will be created prlmar1ly by extensive planting of trees shrubs and ground cover Slml1arly sIgnage within the Sped1lc Plan area will present aunl1Ied visual character through the use of compatible and complimentary colors forms and typography Street fum1sht g Includlng lighting fixtures benches pageantry and entry statements w1Il also be selected to reinforce the overall Identity of the Anaheim Resort 2 2 3 Supply Visitor and Conventlan facilities to Meet Long Term Demand Another Important Sped1lc Plan policy Is to supply the vis itor and convention fac1l1ties that w1Il be needed to meet the e POQ92 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- TIle Anaheim Resort Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context long term demand for recreation convention and visItor serving activities There are three prtmary types offacilities needed to achieve this which are addressed by this plan hotels convention facilities and retall and entertainment facilities First the Specific Plan provides for the addition of up to ap proximately 15 906 new hotel roomswithin the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan CoR District to accommodate the in creased number of visitors Second the Spec11lc Plan provides for the ongoing operation of the Anaheim Convention Center the largest convention facility on the West Coast and uses supportive of this im portant facility the Spec11lc Plan also provides for re tall and entertainment fac1l1ties within the Anaheim Resort Spec11lc Plan area 2 2 4 Improve Public facilities Services and Infrastructure to Accommodate Growth Another Important Spec11lc Plan objective Is to Improve public fac1l1ties servtces and Infrastructure to accommo date the growth and development that Is planned to occur within the Anaheim Resort SpecI1Ic Plan area The public fa c1I1ty components to be Improved as aresult ofthis Plan In clude the transportation Infrastructure In Section 4 0 Publlc Facilities Plan the pedestrian envtron ment and the streetscape described In SectIon 5 0 Design Plan The Plan proposes to create an Integrated pedestrian envtronment that provides convenient connec tions throughout the Anaheim Resort SpecI1Ic Plan area and the adjacent Disneyland Resort An Important element ofthe pedestrian envtronment will be the landscaped park ways and pedestrian facilities that will beprovided through out the area The Plan also proposes streetscape Improvements that are COIDpaUble with those In the adopt ed Disneyland Resort SpecI1Ic Plan and which will contrib ute to aunlfy1ng vtsuaJ character for the entire Anaheim Resort Improvements to underground Infrastructure will also be made including the storm drainage water supply electrical and sewerage systems Enhanced public services will also be prOVided 02095 Page 25 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context 2 2 5 Improve the Transportation System An essential part of the Specific Plan is to identify improve ments to the transportation system so that access to the Anaheim Resort Plan area will be Improved These Improvements include acombination of new access routes to and from Interstate 5 local roadway Improvements and provision for anew fixed guidewaywhich will connect major cities in Orange County These fac1llties will complement those proposed within the adopted Disneyland Resort Spe Plan which includes two high capacity public parking facilities amonorall and an elevated pedestrian way peo ple mover moving sidewalk system Day visitors to the Anaheim Resort Speclf1c Plan area will have convenient access to and from two new public day use parking facilities described in more deta1iin The Disney land Resort Specific Plan These fac1llties will have amaxi mum capacity of 34 300 cars and w1ll accommodate Anaheim Convention Center as well as theme park visi tors Access from the parking fac1llties to the Anaheim Con vention Center will be by shuttle bus or vis the pedestrtan walkway system Overnight visitors by Interstate 5 may use the same interchanges as day visitors but will be directed to surface streets for access to hotels or other fac1l ities within the Anaheim Resort 2 2 6 DevelopImplementation Mechanisms to Assure Quallly Development To assure the overall quality ofthe Anaheim Resort fIwel Spu i fi PIM OICAJ Jl lthe Plan contains Implementation mechan1sms that promote the destgn goals ofthe Plan These mecha nisms include development regulations standards design guidelines as well as apublic fac1llties plan SecUon 5 0 The DesIgn Plan thedesign concepts that w1ll be Implemented to provide aun1fIed Identity The City has also prepared an Identity Program for the Anaheim Resort which has been deveIoped In conjunction with thls Specific Plan and which Is also descr1bed In SectIon 5 0 The zoning and development standards are contained within SecUon 7 0 Zonlng and Development Standards They define the per mitted uses and establish setback standards among other things Also proposed as an Implementation mt n nlcIs the establishment of a non sign program to as sist property owners In thelr signa Into conform ancewith the proposed Anaheim Resort standards e Page 2 d 02096 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim PIOn Section 2 0 Planning Context 2 3 Authority and Scope of the Specific Plan 2 2 7 Enhance and Protect Surrounding Uses implementation of the Specific Plan will enhance and pro tect the surrounding uses through the creation ofdevelop ment setback areas which will be created and maintalned to proVIde an aesthetically appeallng landscaped bulfer be tween development In the Specific Plan area and neighbor Ing uses As a fully Integrated document the Specific Plan proVIdes the overall policy direction In this Section Section 3 0 Land Use Plan and Section 4 0 Pub lic Facilities Plan as well as the particular tools Section 5 0 Desigll Plan and Section 7 0 Zonlng and De velopment Standards needed to ensure that these goals are ach1eved as development ofthe Specific Plan area pro ceeds e The City ofAnaheim s authority to prepare adopt and im plement Specific Plans Is assuredby CalIfornia Government Code Sections 65450 through 65457 Procedures for the adoption implementation andamendment ofSpecific Plans are provtded In Chapter 18 93 Speclfic Plans of the Ana heim MuniC1pal Code The Planning Commission must hold apublic hearing before It can recommend the adoption ofa Specific Plan by the City Counell The City Caunell may then adopt the Specific Plan by ordinance As required by Chapter 18 93 of the Anaheim MuniC1pal Code and CalIfornia Government Code Sections 65450 et seq thls document Includes textand dJagrams which spec Ify the following In detaU e The nature location density and sizeofall existing and proposed land uses Vehicular and pedestrtan the project and surrounding area The provIs1on ofessential urban services including but not lim1ted to public safety public ut1l1t1es recreation and sIn1lIar services as may be required by the propoeed devel opment PertInent land use regulations for implementation ofthe specific plan including supporting Justification for any de velopment standards or procedures which deviate from ex isting City zoning and land use regulations and A discussion of the proposed Specific Plan s consistency wtth the prOVls1ons ofthe General Plan 02097 Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context e i lo ended 10 p vide oWldell MI 0 I dul n fOr the N1v evtlopmonr of tno S if PIM Ne tJr Id Devtlopmo a k Spe ih PIOJ oreA ill likely be Ipl I 0 lumb r of yeAtS indi liducU latd ners renOl d c their prcp t ly or repl Qri 1 inj cuildi wi n OMJ fiR tlo 313 h4 1 n erl 1 a wmed resnolds of elltlop till mod Ii p rpo a hL J J ont ons il t1f CC orJ ZOIO J 0en ut mi ja nOn me4SUl tJ G hA lnj tv i1 frtl f1 rYuir e eommensur Ic II ce 0 wilh Iaf m 4 2 4 Relationship to City Planning Documents and Regulation e Page 2 8 nt schedule setting In addition this document addresses subjects such as ur ban design which are necessary and desirable for imple mentation of the General Plan Further this document provides Information which speci fies how the proposed Specific Plan Is In conformance wtth the following findings which the Planning Commission and the City Council are required to make prior to approving a Specific Plan That the property proposed for the Speclfic Plan has unique slle characteristics such as topography location or surroundings which are enhanced by speclalland use and development standards That the Speclfic Plan Is consistent wtth the goals and pol Icies ofthe General Plan and with the purposes standards and land use guidelines therein That the Speclfic Plan results In development of desirable character which will be compatible wtth existing and pro posed development In the surrounding neighborhood That the Speclfic Plan contributes to abalance ofland us es and That the Sped1Ic Plan respects environmental and a thetic resources consistent with economic real1ties ThIs section describes the ofthe Anaheim Re sort Speclfic Plan to other relevant City planning docu ments and regu1ations 2 4 1 Relationship to the General Plan As previously mentioned the Speclfic Plan must be consis tent with the goa1s and poUeles ofthe General Plan SectIon 6 0 General Plan Consistency Includes a d1scusaIon of each of the applicable General Plan Elements goals and ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context policies and how they are Implemented through the Ana heim Resort SpecUlc Plan A General Plan Amendment Is being requested to the Land Use CirculaUon and Environ mental Resource and Management Elements In order to comprehensively plan for the enhancement of theAnaheim Resort SecUon 10 0 Includes ofGeneral Plan Amendment No 333 related to this SpecUlc Plan 2 4 2 Relationship to Zoning Ordinance The Specific Plan zomng regulaUons and development standards that will apply to the Specific Plan area Upon adopUon ofthe Specific Plan the Anaheim Re sort Specific Plan SP92 2 zomng deslgnaUon will replace the current zomng designaUons for the project area In cas es where the Specific Plan does not addressa parUcular sit uaUon the regulaUons and development standards contained within Title 18 ofthe Anaheim Municipal Code will apply To the extent the two dllfer the Specific Plan s policies dcs1gn gutdcl1nes regulaUons and development standards will apply 2 43 CEQA Requirements An Environmental Impact Report ElR for the Specific Plan was prepared In compl1ance with the Cal1fonUa Environ mental Quallty Act CEQA Pursuant to local and State CEQA Guldcl1nes the City ofAnaheim prepared an ln1Ua1 Study which that certain potentially sign11lcant environmental Impacts be assoctated with develop ment under the SpccI11c Plan The City prepared ElR No 313 under separate cover which Impacts which may result from Implementation ofthe Specific Plan and in cludes recommended mitigaUon measures to lessen these Impacts e 02099 Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 2 0 Planning Context WI luq isli 1100 ptDPOH e Page 2 10 2 4 4 Relationship to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report EIR The City of Anaheim adoptedThe Disneyland Resort Specif ic Plan Specific Plan No 92 1 J and certified Environmental Impact Report No 311 on June 29 1993 The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an In ternatlonal multi day vacation destination resort encom passing approximately 489 7 acres of the Anaheim Resort The plan the development of anew theme park ad ditional hotels and entertainment areas new parking facll Itles and an Internal transportation system In addition the Plan the existing Disneyland theme park to con tinue to be mod11led with new attractions and other im provements Like the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan The Disneyland Re sort Spec11lc Plan Includes refinements to the CR Zone de velopment standards and regulations ortg1nallyadopted In 1967 and revised In September 1990 Italso Includes reo finements to the design guidelines established by the CR Zone The plan also Includes apublic facUitles plan which addresses the timing and extent ofvarious Infrastructure Improvements and services needed to serve the area Although they are separate projects preparation of the Anaheim Resort Spec11lc Plan and The Disneyland Resort Spec11lc Plan were coordlnated to ensure Planning consis tency and to ensure that elements of the plans are comple mentaIy for example definition ofplanning area boundartes the design of the streetscape Improvements and the provts1on ofadequate infrastructure Where appro prtate references or descrpUons of the programs proposed as partofThe Disneyland Resort Spec11lc Plan are Included within this document In order to provide the reader with a better of the relaUonsh1p between the plan ning concepts and programs proposed as partofeach ofthe two Spec11lc Plans 2 4 5 tothe Hotel Circle Plan The Hotel CIrcle Spec11lc PIaD Is currently under consider ation by the City for the p g 6 8 acres oftheAnaheim Resort The Hotel CIrcle Spec11lc Plan provtdes for a total of MIlhotel roomswithin two existing hotels and three new hotels located north ofKatella Avenue between Clementine Street and Haster Avenue Anaheim Boulevard ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resorl Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan 020 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan e 3 1 Regional Location The Specific Plan area Is located In the City of Anaheim 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 7 miles northwest of Santa Ana In Central Orange County Cal1for nla la shows theregional location of the project The project site IS generally located southwest ofInterstate 5 and Is accessible from the Interchanges at Ball Road West Street Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue Freed man Way k 0nIarI0 Paclie Ocean EB NClIth Note Dark Lines RepresentFreeways NIS 3 1o ReglOnal Location Map 02102 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use llan 3 2 Existing Conditions Page 3 4 This Section contains a description of the Specific Plan area and other relevant existing conditions 3 2 1 The Specific Plan Area The Specific Plan area Is locatedwithin theAnaheim Resort an area designated on the City of Anaheim General Plan for recreation and tourist convention related activities along with related uses The Anaheim Resort Itself contains approximately 1046 acres Exhibit 3 2 la shows the location of the Specific Plan area within the Anaheim Resort Harbor Boulevard West Street proposed to be re named Disneyland Drive between 1 5 and Katella Avenue In connection with The Disneyland Resort and Haster Street are the main north south thoroughfares through the project area Katella Avenue Ball Road and Orangewood Avenue are the main east west thoroughfares Interstate 5 also crosses through the Specific Plan area 3 2 2 Existing Uses The current useswithin the Specific Plan area Include ava riety of commercta1 retall hotel motel and and con vention serving uses In addition some non conforming uses such as a mobUe home park industrial and omce fa cUltIes are located In the Specific Plan area The Anahelm Convention Center Is located on the south side of Katella Avenue west of Harbor Boulevard Residential neighbor hoods consisting ofsingle famUy homes and multiple fami lydwelling unitsare located south and west oftheAnahelm Convention Center and around the periphery of the Ana helm Resort ExhIbit 3 2 2a Is an aerial photograph of the Anaheim Re sort and Exhibit 3 2 2b shows the generallocatian of the ex isting uses the Specific Plan area The 1ImIts of Anahelm Resort Specific Plan are also ldentl1led 02103 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan ie e 1i t fo y n Q t j iT i U 1 j I I i i 1 t I 1 i iI i H rJ i a I w I TT m U lcnf I i Lr0 J oj c A I r i I J l I j I I I J i I I I I I I I 106 jl i J l 1Ci I rf A j i t 1 I f l l l LJ I n F1T i TT tl r rr Cij m i U i c g 11 L II I I p oci ii iu r1 wtL 1LJi I 1 J i I I 1 H I I J II 1 il t j i r I I i I I L J1 L l 0 III II I i 1 I I IIll i l ilL J l il t n ad L J L L L The Anaheim Resort Pion Anaheim Callfomla legend L The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim Resort Boundaries N lImll of Anaheim Resort Anaheim Resort PIon LmIt EB DesIgnated for Future extension In General PIon Clrculotton Elemenl IbiJ DesIgnated Future Algnmenlln GeMrol PIon Clrculotton Element CerrIIOS Avenue will be relocated 1 000 10 1 100 leef northerly 0porlton 01 West Slreel wi become 0 cul desac West PlOCe o lII1l 2lIlO Exhibit 3 2 loThe Anaheim Resort PIOn Anaheim ResortBoundanes e 02104 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan IL r tf 4 f l r as T f e J idJl J v i Sip 6 r l rj n i i I t ru l p c r 4 S t J f sr 1 IfJ r w rIi e lr pol t r If r r IJ 1 t k U s Y 1 4 c 1 I l w J V 7iI ll l S I 9 Jt i r v I r Ir 0 k 1 1 I IJJ c A C J I j 1 0 Fj i fIII I J I 1 1 tI I l 11 1 3 r J W I II I 1 c en lf J II 1 c oR l FI 1 I 1 J r Lr if t I 1 I itt JiP J r J i i I i 5 1ii r I o 1 1 1 l BIU 1 11 II I U1 I I N J II l ii I iil ti r i o I 5 1111 t 1 It to J 1I sr III 1 I II IO lll o I I rill 1III I f I 1 C L r c i f 11 R o L 4 P J 1 t I I 2r r 1 fi 11 f f I N JY ct Ii L 7 I j X I I I 1003 r II I 01 C I s o l lI fl r 1D I The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim California Revi e shoC4lf l c PmAheil e or cif fl tm I Circl ijc Plat Legend bcundori LmItor Anahem Resort Anaheim R rt Specll1c Plan Alea Aerial Photograph with An Retortancl The Anaheim Retort Plan lou Ilea EBN o HXXl 2000 reel Exhibit 3 22oAertol Photograph with the Anaheim ResortSpeclnC Plan and Anaheim Resort Bounaarles Page 3 6 02105 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- d Use plan 3 O Lan Section e rt Specific Plan helm Re o The Ana California Anaheim Existing Land Use I 2000 teet 1000 Legend EBNOrlh BiIDI e Public lrutnulionol Vacant I I Public ROW Agrlcunure Open Space Land Use ExhIbit 3 22b EJds1inQ Industrial RV Pork Mobllehome W Pork Servlce Hotel lion Cenler Pork Conven Theme Resldentlal Low De iIy Residential Medium Dens OIlIce Commercial heim R8 Orl Limn at Ana nlc Plan im R8 Orl Spec Limn of Anohe o MNW t1l i I I 02106 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan 3 3 Land Use Plan I dIIII 4 Specific PIOn A ea Page 3 8 Section 3 0 Land Use Plan This section contaJns a description of the land use plan for the Anaheim Resort Specl lc Plan In particular It estab lishes the general policies that will govern land use within the Plan area Section 7 0 Zoning and Develop ment Standards contains specl lc detailed zoning and de velopment standards which are based on the policies described herein The land use plan is based on three major factors that will govern land use within the Specl lc Plan area For each of these three factors the Specl lc Plan provides abackground rationale for the proposed land use regulations as well as a description of the basic land use policies They are The basic land uses permitted in the C R and PR Districts as well as the Mobilehome Park MHP Overlay The maximum development density in the CoR District and The types ofdevelopment standards which will apply to development Exhibit 3 3 la is the Development Plan for the Anaheim Re sort Specl lc Plan Further information about development can be found in Exhibit 3 3 2a Mobilehome Park MHPI Overlay Zone which shows the location of the Overlay Ex hiblt 3 3 3b Development Density Plan which shows the CoR density desJgnations and in Exhibit 3 3 4a Central Core wb1ch shows the location where the provi sions ofthe Central Core apply Exhibit 3 3 3a Is asumma ry table thatincludes pertinent factsabout thedevelo ment proposed for the Sped1lc Plan area With adoption ofthe Anaheim Resort Sped1lc Plan the Development Plan the Mobilehome Park MHP Overlay Zone map the CoR DIstrict Development Density Plan and the Central Core Plan will serve as the zonIng maps for this area 3 3 1 Basic Land Us s As Implied in its name the Anaheim Resort Is intended for land useswith acommercialand orrecreat1oDal emphasis The presence of the Anaheim Conventton Center and the Disneyland Theme Park with the potenual addition ofone or more new theme parks as provided for in The Dtsneyland Resort Sped1lc Plan baa establ1sbed the area as 02107 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e Ibid The Ana elm Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan 3 U l ti j f C 1 j L i j i i i I 1 h l i E 1 1 c l i It I i 1 1 JJa n F 1 I I i it i ill il c I ll I i Z iFr Ijh 111 B w li i C H n I i li L H I f I Jl i J I rJ ll f I Jj 1 1 j 2V J I i III I i 8 I t I i i ii 14 J j r I il L I ll j II The Anahelm RelOrt Plan Anaheim Call1omla Legend c limit 01 AnohemResort Development Plan o llDl 2lDl EB Deslgnaledle Fulure Extension In Generol Pion Circulation Elemenl Commercial Recreallon C R Development Areo 1 Pubic Recreallon PR OIsIrlcl Development Areo 2 r DesIgnated Future Algnmenlln GenetcII PIon CIrc Element ceos Avenue wibe reIocofed1 l1oo 10 1 100 leel nolII eIly 0pottlon 01 west Slreet w become 0CukleIOC West Place Exhibit 3 3 IaDevelopmenl Pion 02108 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan 1 I I Development Areas CoR IiQtJt shaded area PR darksnaded area Page 3 0 an Important regional as well as national and International desltnation In the future other slm1lar attractions may be developed In the area As aresult visitors to the Anaheim Resort require many types of goods and services In order to make theirvisits safe convenient and enjoyable Among the most common visitor requirements are food and lodging Consequently In the 317 6 acre Commercial Recre ation C R Development Area IJ restaurants ho tels and motels w1ll be penn1tted uses In addition many service and retail businesses Intended to accommodate vis Itors such as barber or beauty shops travel agencies au tomobile rental agencies and spectalty retail shops w1ll also be permitted when Integrated within a hotel motel de velopment Those uses whichare consistent with the overall Intent of the Plan but which may require special consider ation In order to assure compatibility with surrounding uses such as day care facilities Intended for hotel patrons w1ll require conditional use permits The 624 400 square foot Anaheim Convention Center one ofthemajor visitor destinations In the Anaheim Resort and the ex 1 600 roomAnaheim HUton Hotel are located In the 62 S acre Public Recreation CPR DIstr1ct Development Area 2 ThIs DIstr1ct has the same boundaries as the cur rent PR Zone and Is Intended to preserve regulate and con trol the orderly use ofCity owned properties such as Convention Center complexes and adjacent prtvate proper ties Other related visitor serving uses allowed In the DIs tr1ct as accessory uses are concession stands restaurants and shops Section 7 0 Zoning and Deve10pment Standards contains acomplete list ofall the permitted primary uses as well as accessory uses conditional uses and prohibited uses 02109 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort specmc Plan Section 3 0 Land Use plan l ni Spui PI e i lIe f1t nl IS jj I seJ OiSfl1 ot Th d siq i lCS uc fln I mopm I u o 1 0 20 cf eAU f l3ed s fiJA foctA Jex l p i 1 f il s be dvtIDp i rAJd tll fld ulU w ill I ClCl I 1 fl acallt uU m t w e s ill utt t 1 cthl t J e mG TI IlJl r pt tnl ncne dtilsi y d tit rit of cne f I oiC1 Ph t tL SJI Mia n1 I4c 1 f JoIGoIilLc d AlJ rt per i h OU fI 06r d W II R Df m5 Jill f pert 1kJ r C U c Ill I petm c n LLt pefmifIW J I oltn ll 11 5 1 iJJt SJ c 1n Ir siics of sAid use 8llReJ hoSt SSDCI o1lMe ineruiU p 1IcJ ift f lCIc I1dudi1 4C lll J dtn l delr n b I C Tr t 111 J r II IV T7Alf1 p o oIfI4S e dfn dt n4jl S I I I I I 1 Mobile Home Overlay I I 1 I C 11 DevelOpment 3 3 2 Mobllehome Park MHP Overlay Zone Currently there Is a Mobllehome Park MHP Overlay Zone on two properties located In the southeastern portion and one In the northern portion of the Specific Plan area The MHP Overlay Zone Is Intended to provide developmenl stan dards for mobUehome parks and 10 mltigale relocation problems and adverse effects of displacement upon moblle home owners when apark Is converted to another land use These parcels will continue to have the MHP Overlay desig nation under thJs Specific Plan 3 3 3 CoR District Development Density Development density Is the amounl ofdevelopmenl permit ted as afunction ofthesize ofadevelopment site Fu hut J QRq IiIili J 1 aft lalul tl 1tM 11 yl 4u V l p rI U da8AR El as tileB lr fr8811lB III ttt t p P Development density is an important con slderation with respect to land use because It determines the need for public Infrastructure such as streets water service sewers storm drains and public services It Is the Intent of the Specific ptan to permit the maximum amount ofdevelopment In the planning area consistent with the ca pacityof the area s Infrastructure In order to ensure the fu ture adequacy of the public Infrastructure the Anaheim Resort Specific ptan contains regulations which govern de velopment density within the CoR ExhIbit 3 3 3b the CoR Development Density Ptan shows the location ofthe four 1 density within the C R ExhIbit 3 3 2a the C R De velopment Density y Tabulation compiles the de velopment potent1al Low Density which permits development ofup to 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever Is greater Low Medium which permits development ofup to 75 roomsper gross acre or 75 rooms whichever Is greater Medium which permits development of up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever Is greater and Convention Center Medium which permits devel opment of up to 125 roomsper gross acre with Me lIl iTll eroo hAf4 ier tia Page 3 71 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan 1tr J l 5 i I j Q C oI J o 1 41 hl l im 4 J i 1 I 1 i 1 i I r I 0 CiI S J 111 I 10 1 1 e cj rtl VIc heslP nuc I c J r 1 a 1 I r 4iZtJ i I o i I lit r Ll i L t i 1 i il i 1 I 1 j o wbeN la MeSec1lDnLO it L l I I ll il t L i i li 1liL a i i Ii i Ii h d t IRu b c 11 w I I 1 J I Ii o c f JU i i i I I T g ii il i 1 1 i H Iii t 1 I 1 ii 11 J II L JL Ju LJ 0 dot 1 ii The Anaheim Resort Plan Anaheim California Legend LmIt of Anahetm Resort DesIgnated fOf Future Extension In General Pion C culollon Element Anahetm Resort PIon Area PorcelS SUbject to he MobIIehOme Part Overlay Zone In he CoR Mobllehome MHP Park Overlay Zone In the C R DIstrict t EB Ibid 0cerrtlOS Avenue wi be relocated UXXlto 1 1 Xl feet nortIleIlV a portlon of West Street will become acuklesac West Place 3 2o Mob lehOme Port MPH Overlay Zone DesIgnated Future AIgM1entln General Plan Ckculotlon Element Page 312 02111 e 1 eel ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan e COR District Development Density Summary Tabulation Density Designation Low Maximum ApprOXimate Acres rounded Up to 50 714 rooms acre Up to 75 1716 rooms acre Up to 100 19 2 rooms acre Up to 125 554 rooms acre 317 6 Low Medium Medium Convention Center ICC Medium Total Existing Maximum Hotell HotellMotel Motel Rooms Rooms 1926 3 77700 4 523 12 873 422 1 920 2 719 6 926 9 590 25 496 The maximum density for each lot or parcells the number ofhotel motelrooms acre noted In this table or 75 rooms per lot parcel on the date of adoption of the Anahetm Resort Specl1lc Plan Is greater For parcels that are developed with hotel or motel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation the number of rooms on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specl1lc Plan may be rebullt or modUled at their density Due to the enhaneed u1ttmate of way required by adopted General Plan Amendment No 331 for Harbor Boulevard 112 feetl Katel1a Avenue 123 feet Freedman Way III Jlfeet and West Street Disneyland Drtve north of Ball Road 110 feet and between CerTltos Avenue and Katel1a Avenue 2 Jlfeet to Implement the Public Realm streetscape program prop erties along these streets may Include the additional r1ght of way In their property acreage when computtng density The maximum number of hotel motel rooms Includes the 507 room Pan Hotel rip en ol chAt4lt crl S hcJ The I RM81UB t1U h r of these hotel motelrooms shaI1 be mitigated to the equJvalent of 100 rooms per acre Summary of Density Designations for the 1 5 Future Widening ot Way Area Low Up to 50 3 8 190 rooms acre Low McdJum Up to 75 7 7 579 rooms acre Medium Up to 100 3 6 360 rooms acre Total 15 1 1129 3 3 3o C R Deve OplTlent Derwty Summoty TabutatlOn e 02112 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan l m f 1 F J 4 s I Y a I I 1 I c J II I I j i I c 1 j j Ir Ih Ii i Ii Ii III rJl J iCll j 1 I L Lill c L rTf ff lI r I t Jt iJ III I 1 1 i I l I L c I I 1 J liI i I t Ii i lL UU i Ii 1 i l KOMIa 1IlCCIIN O fofOlflelI ed The Anaheim Resort Plan Anaheim Call1omla Legend c CoR District Development Density Plan MS IM Un D 1 ftI RIItt o 11DI 2IllXI EB Ibid Deslgnated FulWe Algnmenlln GenetaI Plan ClrcUClllanE I fACerrllOS Avenue wibe reloCated 1 000 10 11 00 eel nartnerly aporttan 01 W8S1 5 1 wll beCame a cul desac W8S1 Place 3 3 3t C R DIStrIct Development Density PIon Page 3 14 LmlI 01 Ananelm Resort OeslgnaIed fo Future Extension In General Plan Ckculafton Elemenl low DensIty Up10 iO Halel RoomsGroa Acre 075 roams whichever Is greater low Medk m0ensIIy Up 10 75 HolelRoomsl Grass Acre 075 roams erls greater Medk mDenolly Up 10 100 Halel Rooms Gross Acre 075 roams whIClleYerls greater Conventton Cenler Medium Up to 125 Holel RoomsGross Acre 075 roamsW lIC L C 1Ol I WIth AftWIr mIflgated to 11 8 01100 roams per acre l Ui n 02113 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The AnaheIm Plan e e L Section 3 0 Land Use Plan et 1en Impacts mltigated to the of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms whichever Is greater Within each of these districts however the Specific Plan permits existing hotels or motels to rebuild or renovate at the density existing on the date of adoption of the Specific Plan even if it exceeds the maximumdensity established by the Specific Plan In lthlUi61l te1 le Betelmstel r9jV U i tteil Ill t99 fth Lt b tcI jeet 1 Ki HI a p l g T t IIl J h 4 l d V iPltar rlf 11 1 111 wt 1Q 10 11 1 t 1 RI8T1lU 3 3 4 Development Standards The third factor land use within the planning area are the additional development standards which w1ll be appl1ed to parcels In the heart or Central Core of the Anaheim Resort The Central Core Includes parcels with frontage on Harbor Boulevard between Interstate 5 and Orangewood Avenue and all parcels with frontage on KateJla Avenue between Haster StreetlAnaheim Boulevard and Walnut Street For reasons described In the next paragraph the Central Core requlres different standards than does the periphery espec1ally with respect to building massing and provtslon for pedestrtans ThIs sector Is depleted In ExhIbit 3 3 4a Development on the parcels within the Central Core has an especially impor tant role to play In creating an overalllmage for the Ana helm Resort Inasmuch as the Central Core Is In close prOXlm1ty to the Area s major attraCUons the potential for pedestrtan use Is greatest In this area By IriTlg the Cen tral Core a more Interesting area to walk through the Cen tral Core development standards w1ll encourage more people to leave thelr cars and walk therebyimproving ve hicular tra1llc flow The uses adjacent to these stretches of road within the area w1ll also have astronger vI on thelarge number ofvehlcles wb1ch pass through It each day than other sectors ofthe planning area Among the differences In development standards between the Central Core and the periphery are the following In the Central Core no parking w1ll be allowed between the publ1c of way and the building face lring the Central Core more vtsually Interesting since the parked ve 02114 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan 0 j t 11 i J 1 r l L C br n i t r 1 I I c Lll i I i I I rl T A L l m r I I a 1 r J i 4 r a I I AI n i illO j in wi i I U 1 i Ii 1 C 1 1 trI 1 1 v JH Erti 1 f 1ili I d i LI l 4 rrTj ii i l l 1 L i i j L 1r i i 11 I u I Ii I I J I f L e The Anaheim Resort Speclnc Plan Anaheim Callfomla Legend Central Core Plan C J LmIt 01 Anaheim RllIOIt Anaheim RllIOIt EB Plan Boundary DeIIgnaIed 10 Future Ex1enIIon In 0 la ll lOlIO Genellll Plan CIrc E Cen1Tal Care Slandards and DeoIgnaled Fulure Algnment In guldelnes apply ta PfOI 8fIIeI PlanC1rc E t wttI1 franlage aIang par1tans al Katela Avenue Ibid f Centtas Avenue wi be relacated UXXl ta and Harbat 8a MYard 1100 leel narthelIy apartIan 01 West Street Special landscaped IntetseCtIans wi became a cul desac West Place deIc In Sec1lan 56 3 4 or the SpecttIc Plan doc Exhibit 3 3 4o CentraJ Core Page 3 16 e ---PAGE BREAK--- I e e The Anaheim Re arf Specltic Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan Ill he I Pei hlcles will be behind the bullcl1ngs Whereas In the periph ery parking Is allowed In front ofa bullcl1ng provided said parking Is not WIthin the required setback from the publJc right of way SpecIal landscape provisIons which allow greater areas of hardscape to penntt outdoor dining In the front setback area will be allowed along Harbor Boulevard In the Central Core allowing pedestrtans interesting activities to view Outdoor dining In the front setbacks Is not allowed In the periphery Bullcl1ngs In the Central Core willbe required to occupy a of 60 of the frontage adjacent to the right of way or provide asolJd mass of landscape to achieve the same effectl In order to create awell defined edge for the street No such wlI1 apply to parcels outsIde the Central Core and Spec1ai Landscaped Intersections wlI1 be required at the entrances td and the center ofthe Central Core to create an edge and center orient the pedestrtan visually These spec1ai development standards for the Central Core are described In Section 7 0 Zonlng and Development Standards Section 5 0 The Destgn Plan also contains guidelines which distinguish one area from another 02116 Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 3 0 Land Use Plan 02117 Page 3 18 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan 4 1 Regional Circulation Programs The Publ1c Facl11ties Plan contains a of the pro posed plans for transportation ut1llties Infrastructure and services for the Spec1fic Plan area The first two Subsections planned regional Improvements which have an im pact on the project The Improvements under sVf Y T l f I Z e each of the rema1nlng Sections are Intended to all the in frastructure services needed for the complete buUdout of theAnaheim Resort More detailed Information concemlng the proposed publ1c facilities ts proVided in EIR No 313 which contains detaUed maps and exhibits including a thorough discussion of the existing cond1tions within the Specific Plan area Currently several major facl11ties provide vehicular access to the Spec1fic Plan area They include Interstate 5 Katella Avenue Haster StreeYAnaheim Boulevard Ball Road Har bor Boulevard and Freedman Way Secondary roadswithin the Anaheim Resort Spec1fic Plan area include Manchester Avenue Clementine Street Orangewood Avenue Walnut Street and West Street DIsneyland DrIve All other streets within the Specific Plan area are Local Streets including AlroWay Casa Vista Street Mountain View Avenue Ox Road Vermont Avenue and Zeyn Street Many roads within the area are anticipated to be Improved in connection with otherlocal County and State circulation programs Facl11ties In this category include Interstate 5 Interchanges at West Street Disneyland DrIve Harbor Boulevard Ball Road and Katella Avenue Freedman Way Gene Autry Way Avenue and Or angewood Avenue w1Jl be Improved as part ofthe Interstate 5 widening Katella Avenue Is anticipated to be widened aspart ofthe Orange County Smart Street Program and Intersections at Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue Katella Avenue and Anaheim BOulevard Haster Street Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road Harbor Boulevard and Convention Way and Haster Street and Pac1fico Avenue have been IdenU1ied as part ofAnahelm s CrIticallntersec tiOD Program Funding for these Improvements w1Jl be from state and fed eral funds Orange County s Measure M funds as well as other publ1c and prtvate sources 02119 Page 4 3 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e 4 2 Programs e Page 4 4 The City s General Plan Identifies a future roadway exten slon of Pacifico Avenue east of Harbor Boulevard to inter state 5 Thls road would provide an entrance and exit to the hlgh occupancy vehicle HOV lanes planned for Interstate 5 Exhibit 4 la shows the existing circulation system as well as planned Improvements to the existing system In the preceding paragraphs The Transportatlon and Cir culatlon Sectlon of the Environmental Impact Report also contains detailed Informatlon on the existing circulatlon system The widening ofInterstate 5 w1ll bring changes to Interstate 5 and the Interchanges providing access to the Anaheim Resort These changes Include the of more travel lanes on Interstate 5 including special carpool lanes that w1ll have direct access to off ramps leading Into the Anaheim Resort Although these Improvements are not essential for smooth functlOnlng access to the early devel opment phases of the AnaheJm Resort Specl1lc Plan they w1ll further Improve access to the area Current plans for the wldenlng of Interstate 5 Include northbound and southbound hlgh occupancy vehlcle HOVJ lanes The Anaheim Resort Is located In an area that has been served by public ut1l1tles and fac1l1tles for many years As part of ongoing efforts to Improve the City s Infrastructure new fac1l1tles are CUITently planned or underway Some of these such as Improvements to the regional sewage treat ment fac1l1ties are planned to proceed regardless of the ac t1v1ty In the Anaheim Resort Spec1flc Plan area Among the projects CUITently proposed are Addition to capacity at regional sewage treatment fac1l1 tles New larger water lines and anew well to supply Increased demand of ut1l1ties on Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and West Street DIsneyland Dr1ve and Constructlon of additional electrical substation capacity These projects are discussed In greater detallln the Envi ronmental Impact Report ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan 1 CIMIIIOIA J i L 1 1 1 i r I I i 4 I t i I The Anaheim Resort Plan Anaheim Callfomla Legend J Limit 01 Anahem Resort L 2 Anahem Resort Specl1tc Pion Boundary Designated lorFuture Extension In General Pion Ckculotlon Elemenl Existing CIrculatIon EBN o lem 2000 tee Ib J Cerrnos Avenue wm be relocated 1000 10 1 100 leel northerly a portion 01 West Street wID become a cul de sac ewest Ploce t Dlor of liM nfea m le hiDit DeslQnated Future Alignment In General PIOn Circulation Element Exh b l4 Io ClrculallOn System 02121 Page 4 5 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan e 4 3 Vehicular Circulation Plan tor the Anaheim Resort 4 3 1 Connections to Interstate 5 Connecnoru to nt ale5 e Page 4 6 Section 4 0 Public Faci lities Plan Convenient automobile access to the Anaheim Resort Is an essential component to the success of the area Most vlsl tors will come to the Anaheim Resort by automobile or bus and It Is especIally Important that the visItors expertence be pleasant upon both arrival and departure In connection with The Disneyland Resort several improve ments to the area wide circulation system wereproposed These Improvements which are descrIbed In The DIsney land Resort Specific Plan are summarized here to demon strate how the convenient automobile access will function The following IS adiscussion ofthe proposed circulation im provements proposed for the Anaheim Resort including those Improvements that are part of The DIsneyland Resort Specific Plan Convenient connections from Interstate 5 to the proposed public facilities were proposed In The Disneyland Resort Approxlmately 70 of thevisitors to the Disneyland Resort will arrive on Interstate 5 Moving them on and off the Freewaysafely and efficIently will be accomplished In a variety ofways Durtng the early stage ofimplementation ofThe DIsneyland Resort Spec1flc Plan IfInterstate 5 has not yet been wid ened a new mixed Dow off ramp will be constructed at the West Street Disneyland Drive exit north of Ball Road ThIs will permIt southbound trafllc to exit on to Ball d to exit onto arampthat prOVIdes adirect link to the public parking fac1l1ty In the West Parking Area of the Disneyland Resort ExhIbIt 4 3 I Interstate 5 West Street Disneyland Drive Interchange as Shown In The DIsneyland Resort Specific Plan illustrates several features of this Inter1m condition the new southbound off ramps and the overpass over Ball Road ExIsting access patterns to surrounding properties will gen erally be maintained except that existing West Street will be made Into a cul de sac south ofBall Road and renamed West Place see ExhIbIt 4 4aVeh1cular C1rculatlon Plan The DIsneyland Resort Spec1flc Plan also prOVIdes for changes at the new West Street DIsneyland DrIve access that will depending upon ava1lable funding permIt south bound Interstate 5 traftlc to exit from the HOV lane directly onto the ramp that provides convenient access to the park ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort SpecHlc Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Nortnboul lCl MOV IrQlfic Nortnbouncl rn 8d tr Itl ie NortnboundOtI l Qmp 101 0 oNe SOUthboI IndOtl offiC SOvlf lboundHOVlane n ac acc TlOdC 01 grade WOIOM IoIRoad 1lon Nol fInOI contlgufanon 01 1h1t areabe 01deIc rI ed n the M MonItOMg IOn or EIR 311 OCCornrnodGte eitherW IbouN l Of ttOfIc QlNC ory I I DllnetAanC1 Back ot hOuSe he ytand 1pecIIc Interstate S West Street Disneyland Drlve Interchange Showing Entrance 10 west orattIc ftDw Re Ie toneI o 100 EB 200 u EXhlbIl4 3 1enfersfafe 5West Drive InferchanQe as Shown In The Disneyland Resort SpecifIC Plan 02123 e e e Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e e Page 4 8 ing facility as proposed in the adopted Disneyland Resort Speclfic Plan or West StreetDisneyland Drive When traf fic leaving the public parking facility in the Disneyland Re sort exceeds the traffic entering the facility the lanes leading into the parking facility and crossingover Ball Road would be reversed permitting Visitors to exit the parking fa cility conveniently onto the freeway Generally the lanes will be used for inbound traffic in the morning and for out bound traffic in the afternoon and evening Use ofthe inter change by those not Visiting the Disneyland Resort and or not in a HOY will be accommodated conveniently wtth the allowance of amandatory at grade opposite flow lane in each dJrection A slmUar system depending on avallable funding will per mitVisitors arriving from the south to exit the HOY lane on aramp that travels under the elevated portion of the Free way and provides convenient access to uses located in the east part of the planning area ThIs system will enable visi tors to avoid existing trafDc signals and wt1l keep Anaheim Resort traffic from congesting traffic on Katella Avenue see Exhibit 4 3 1trInterstate 5 Katella Avenue Interchange as Shown in The DIsneyland Resort Speclfic Plan In addition The Disneyland Resort Plan proposed the relocation of Cerrltos Avenue approximately 1000 feet north of Its existing location ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e Southboundoff romp on floWe Frontage Rood NorthbOUnd mixedIOnes NOtII IbOUnd HOV Lone SouthboundHOV Lone SouthDOUnd HOV lane Northbound HOVk lne NorIt1bOund HOY orr omp10 WQy ld milced lane on omp mlIedtraffic acerood to Fteeamon Wart h woy I I I I NorthbOund rnilted hame 01 Kofela A NOl 1I lbO ndmiad trorriC Ol Homp e SoutnclouncImaed hi ace to OfWCn II CIl IdKoteIQ Avenue I IrotfiCofI crnp tGnc ofI Imp outhbol ndrnIdCl tromc orwamp kontoge fOOCf occ A R 1pecIlIc Plan A Interstate 5 Katella Avenue Interchange OItKaon 01 ffafIC now kI o ZIl CD 1 Exhibit 4 3 It 1ntersfate S Katella Avenue IntercharIQe 0Shown In The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan e 02125 Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e 4 4 Anaheim Resort Arterial Secondary System wt StteetlD sneyfOnd DtIY 8NottrJ at 80 Road e Page 4 10 1 One of the Important objectives of the Anaheim Resort Spe cific Plan Is to traffic Impacts on surrounding ar terial and secondary streets The system ofnew connections to the Freeway that lead conveniently to area uses will con tribute significantly to thls obJective In addition improve ments will also be made to the local streets that will enhance the overall vehicular circulation within the Ana heim Resort The street cross sections described In the Sec tion are typical mid block sections They are not Intended to depict every condition which may exist In the Spec1f1c Plan area Additionally more detalled Information about street rights of way can be found In Section 5 8 of the De sign Plan They are subject to variationat intersections and at other locations with the approval of the City The exhibit on the follOwing page Is the Vehicular Circula tion Plan It shows the location of the major roads and streets within the Plan area The spec1f1c improve ments proposed for each street are discussed onthe follow Ing pages West Street DrlJ1e the new name for the alignment of existing West Street between Interstate 5 and Katella Avenue will be sign11icantly modUled to serve both the Disneyland Resort and uses within the Anaheim Resort Plan area such as the Anaheim Convention Center The followtng Is a description ofthe modUlcations that will occur to West Street DIsneyland Dr1ve AJJ previously described Disneyland Dr1ve w1I1 be connected to Interstate 5 with an Interchange Between Interstate 5 and Ball Road the e x1sting West Street w1I1 be ned to accommodat tra1Ilc ordeparting from 1 hJch t the Anaheim Resortl U n lS the publ1c parking fac1I1Ues In the DIsneyJand Resort the Anaheim eonvenUOD Center and lirahotels At Ball Road anew two lane ovapass w1Il carty southbound DIsneyJand Dr1vetrafiIc over Ball Road TraI Ic bound for other destinations w1Il have full access to Ball Road Exb1b1t 4 4b Proposed West Street DIsneyland Dr1ve Plan North of Ball Road Is aplan which shows the proposed of way parlnrays stdewalks and trave11anes for this part10D ofWest Street DIsneyland Dr1ve ---PAGE BREAK--- bi P t The Anaheim Relart Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan I I j j f I r I i Cotmt I Iin pe 1 11 11 EI I I Q i icl Mnue oJ n tnt oh rCtl r oct lII l S The Anahelm Reaort Speclnc Plan Anaheim California Vehicular Circulation Plan EB C A be teIOCatecll to 1 100 eel narttletly apofIIon 01 West S1Iee wi Decome ac West Place Legend J LmII 01 Anohern Resort lIB Anohem Plan Area Dellgnafed 0Fu1ufe ExI In GeMal Plan CkculO1lOn Elemenl Dellgnafed Fulufe AlgMl8nl In GeneIlII PIOn OculalIOn EIlIment EJdl CII4 CltCuIaIIon PIon 02127 Page 4 11 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- r The Ananelm Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e west Streer D y OnC1 Drtve Nort 1of Katella Avenue e Page 4 12 51001 sidewolk 5 fool sidewalk 8 fool parkway 8 foal parkway 3lravellanes typical 3 Iravellanes typical 13ft I 113ft 36 feel mln 36 feel min of way 98ft mln Exhibit 4 4b Proposed Disneyland Drive Plan North of Ball Rood Between Ball Road and Katella Avenue West Street DIs neyland Drtve will have two basic cross secUon cond1t1Ons The applies to the porUon ofthe street between Ball Road and the the public parking facUlties andIS de In The DISneyland Resort Sped1lc Plan ThIS section ofWest Street DIsneyland DrIve south ofBall Roadwill guide visitors south to the west parking area entry Tralflc on BallRoad will have full at grade access to West Street DIsneyland DrIve The second cond1t1on for West Street DIsneyland DrIve IS south of the entry to the publJc parking facUlty West Street DIsneyland Drtve prOvIdes access to hotels and oth er uses wtth1n the Anaheim Resort ThIS portion of the street will have two northbound and two southbound lanes oftra1Ilc separated by aratsed landscaped medlan Right and left turn lanes may be required Insome locations to 1m prove trafIJc flow ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Rert Speclnc Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan w 5ouft OlKaIeIIa A ue i 2 travel 2 travel e lanes lanes Btoat B faot parkway parkway landscaped 8 toot Btoot J median j sidewalk sidewalk I 24ft 115ft 24ft I Right at way 95 teet I 4 4c Proposed west Street Dlsneyfand Olive Cross Sec tlon Between Kotel aA venue and Cerrffos Avenue South of KateUa Avenue West Street wID not be renamed and wID bewidened at the intersection with KateUa Avenue for additional turning lanes In order to accommodate in creased trafllc South of this widening approximately 600 feet south ofthe Intersection with KateUa Avenue the right of way and roadway wID return to the existing General Plan width whichaccommodates two lanes oftravel In each direction Exhibit 4 4dWest Street South of KateUa Ave nue Cross Sect1on the current configuration ofthis porUon ofWest Street e 8foof poIkway Moot parkway 5toot 1 sidewalk j 2 tTOveI lanes 1 5foot sidewalk 2travel lanes Jd J 32ft 32ft ld l RIght of way 90 feet 4 4ciWelt Strt Souttl of KoteIa Avenue CfOSS SectIOn 02129 e Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e West Place Cul deSac Freedman Way e Page 4 14 L Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Immediately south of Its existing Intersection with Ball Road existing West Street referred to In this document as West Place will end In acul de sac to serve the uses already located at this intersection as well as aportion of the Dis neyland Resort This street will become alocal street and the proposed Cross Section Is depleted In Exhibit 4e Proposed West Place Cross Section Formerly West Street South of Ball Road 101001 parkway 4 1001 Sidewalk 020 001 J parkway 101001 parkway j 4 1001 sidJ e I001 parkway Minimum one Iravellone each direclion J 114 34ftl 52ft 114 34ftl ol way lOll120ft I I Exhibit 4 4 Proposed West Place CrOSl Section Formetty West Street South 01 BoIRood I reedman Wag will be widened between Interstate 5 and Harbor Boulevard from Its current condition of two travel lanes In each direction to three to four travel lanes In each direction to serve the trafIIc entering and leavtng the east portion ofthe Anaheim Resort and the public parking facil Ity located In the East Parking Area ofThe DIsneyland Re sort Spedllc Plan The portion ofFreedman Way west of Clementine Street Is described In The DIsneyland Resort Spect1lc Plan Between Clementine Street and Interstate 5 there will be apainted medlan as In the plan be low ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Speclnc Plan Section 4 0 Public FacUities Plan 8toot parkway Moot dewalk Minimum 3 Pointed travel Median Iones Minimum 3 trovellanes 8toot parkway 5toot sidewalk I Minimum 35 teet 35 teet I l 115ft I Minimum right ot way 111 teet minimum Exhibit 4 4t oposecJ F eedmon Way Plan East of Clementine Sf eet Korflla A w 1 DIIMyfond om 5 KateU4 Auenue will contlnue to have three lanes oftravel In each direction within the Anahelm Resort Proposed 1m provements to east and westbound KateUa Avenue Include turn lanes and double left turn lanes at its intersec tion with Harbor Boulevard and at other locations as nec essary as well as a raised landscaped med1an which will separate opposing ttafIIc between A gI It ed intersections Although KateUa Avenue Is depicted as having three lanes oftravel In the Spedftc Plan Kate1laAvenue will be four lanes westboundfrom 600 feet east of Clementine Street to Harbor Boulevard to accommodate the propoeed Regional TransportatIon Center The Spedftc Plan also recognIZeS that KateUa Avenue ultimatelywill bewtdened to four lanes In each d1rectIon east ofWest Street DIsneyland Drive to accommodate ruture growth In the Anahelm Resort The Spedftc Plan m9llates theu Umate of way needed to pravlde for four lanea or travel In each dIrec tIon Interstate Ii lIDd West Street DIsneyland Drive Exb1bIt 4 4g 1Dtalm KateUa Avenue slw Interstate 5 lIDd West Street DIsneyland Drive Cross SectIon lIDd Ex h1b1t 4 4htnUmate Kate1laAvenue Cross SectIon Iktwc cn Interstate 5 lIDd West Street DIsneyland Drive show the lo cation or the ultimate or way adjacel1t to the SpecUlc Plan area as well as the Intalm c ond1tIaD 02131 Page 4 15 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Uttimate right of way Uttimate right of way Addrtionallandscape Addilionallandscape 8 oot landscaped parkway 8 foot landscaped parkway 11 24 I 35 I 2426 I 35 24 11 Right of way varies 164166 J 8 foot sidewalk j 8 foot landscaped parkway 3 travel lanes 8 foot sidewalk landscaped median j 8 foot landscaped J parkway 3 Itovel lanes Exhibit 4g1nterimKatella Avenue Between Interstate 5 and West Street Disneyland Drive CrossSection Ultimate right of way 8 foot landscaped parkway 8foot sidewalk j 8loot landscaped parkway 4ltavet Ian8S Ultimate right of way 8foot landscaped parlcway 8lootsidewalk landscaped median 8Ioot 1 landscaped parkway 4 10 24 46 2426 46 I 24 Right of way 164 166 EJth bIt4 1ttnate KateIa A venue CrOll SectIOn Between inNwilt5 and Welt Street DIsneyland Drtve Page 4 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re art Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Kate laAvenue Between W Street Dlsneytand Olive and Walnut Street Katella Avenue between Walnut Street and West Street Disneyland Dr1ve w1ll remain astreet with three travel lanes In each dJrect1on however the ralsed landscaped median w1ll from amln1mum of 15 feet wide to amedian which Is a mIn1mum of 24 to 26 feet wide ExhIbit 4 4IUl tlmate Katella Avenue Cross Section Between Walnut Street and West Street DIsneyland Drive shows the ultimate no interim of Katella Avenue between West Street Disneyland Dr1ve and Walnut Street seE Corridor see Olsney1and iResortj 8r J caped parkway 3 travel lanes I 16ft I ft LondoCaped median wk tth varies 26 eet at nd DrIVe 15 eet ol Wa nul Slree I I 1I100 landSCapec1 parkway IItoo Waltj IItOOlIOndscapec1 J parkway 3 trovelianes ft 24ft RIght of way 125 136 ft 4 4 Ulttmote Kcttello Avenue C oa Section Between Walnut Street and West Street DIsneyland Drive W llel f n ll le JVJ 11 R Walnut w1ll be malntalned as a street though access to existing usesnorth ofCen1tos ftDue w1ll be con tlnued at presentlevels Walnut Street be modltled to carry two lanes oftraftJc In each direction AIt o7 11M C1J I 3 ur I D iJlI Pbll1 t T T r r l rL 1 refer to T 1e DIsnevIand Resort SpecIflc Plan for a 1In f1 MN 4iituU Impl entaa au le d L lh t A J 1I1l1tII Rall11 The followtng destgD w1Il gu1de construct1on ofWalnut S The aIatIDg curb aDd gutter parkway and sidewalk con dlt10DS on the west side of the street w1Il remain as Is In their t 10000t tnn A raised ped medIaD flfteen feet wtde w1ll be con structed Road and Katella Avenue within the 02133 Page 4 17 e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan HarlIor Boulevard One ofthe benefiCIal elJects of provid Ing convenient access to the publ1c parking facWty In the Anaheim Resort will be the removal ofany Increased traftIc from Harbor Boulevard betften Interstate 5 and Katella Av enue Harbor Boulevard south oflnterstate 5 will remaln a six lane d1v1ded road w1thInthe Spedftc Plan area at Freedman Way KateUa Avenue ConvoenUon Way Orange woodAvenueand at otherlocaUona wbere Itwill bewtdened to accommodate addtt10Dal and left turn lanes The next t shows the typIca1 Harbor Boulevard crosssec Harbor 80 0South oIlnt ate 5 tion which will apply bdw uOrangewood Avenue and a point appraxlmately 150250 feet south ofManchester Av enue on the west stele and to Manchester Avenue on the z st stele e e Page 4 18 current paved section of the street with median openings approved by the City New curb and gutter will be constructed on the east side of Walnut Street only where no curb and gutter currently exist Existing curb and gutter on the west stde ofWainut Street w1lJ remaln in their current locations and The parkway on the east side w1lJ be modtfied so that there will be acontinuous eight foot wide landscaped parkway and five foot wide pedestrtan walk within the Spec1ftc Plan area Setback and sidewalk parkway condition vories to remain as i 2 travel lanes 2 travel lone j 8 toot parkway J foot sidewalk Landscaped medlon J I 24ft I 15ft I 24ft ot way vanes 7 ft Exhibit 4 4I Proposed WalnutStreet Croos Section ---PAGE BREAK--- 81001 parkway 81001 sidewalk J 81001 parkway The Anaheim Re or Plan 2411 Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan landscaped median 81001 parkway 8 1001 dewalk e Minimum 31ravel lenes Minimum 31ravel lanes J J 8 1001 parkway l20 mn 2611 I 35 to 38 II mln 35 10 3811 min 2411 Righl ol wayvaries 138 10 150 II Exhibit 4 4k Proposed Harbor Boulevard Cross Section Orangewoad to Manchester Avenue on the East Side and Orangewood to 15250 FeBt South of Manchester Avenue on the WestSide Haroor Boulevard Between Moner ond In at 5 Between 150250 feet south of Manchester Avenue on the west SIde and Manchester Avenue onthe east side to the in terstate 5 Interchange the Harbor Boulevard right of way w1ll narrow to transition to the Harbor Boulevard overpus which Is ra1Sed above thefieeway landscaped median e j 9 1001 patkwayl sidewalk Mlniml m 3 ttavel lanes j 9 tooi patkwayl sidewalk j Mlnimlm 31ravel lanes I I 3511 mtI 3511 mtI Right of way vClies 102 1 OBII mlnmum hIbIt4 ropoeed HOtbot BOIAevatd C O ISecIlOn Between Manctteslet A 011 the East SkJe and 150250 teet Souttl of A 011 the Welt SkJe to the Intetstote 5 Interchange e 02135 Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Speciffc Plan e HOft 1of Boulevard North of Interstote 5 e Page 4 20 Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan C7 North of Interstate 5 Harbor Boulevard Is proposed to reo main per Its current General Plan designation wtth araised median and six lanes of travel except at Ball Road and in terstate 5 where It wtJl be widened to accommodate addi tional through and right and left lanes The parkway wtJl consist of a 9 foot sidewalk with cutouts for tree wells 9 foot sidewalk tree wel J 3 travelianes mlnmum 9 lootsidewalk treewels J landscaped 3 traveliane Medoon minlmuml I 43ft I I 43ft w I Uttlmate of way 120 fl 4 4rr Propaled Harbor Boulevard Crou Secfton Interstate S North BeaU Road wt1l be slx lanes except at West Street DIsney land DrIve Ox Road and Harbor Boulevard where It wt1l be wtdened to accommodate additional and eft turn lanes West ofWest Place Ball Road wt1l have landscape medians and east ofWest P1ace It wt1l have painted medi ans of wayvartes from 103 to 106 feet The ultimate of waywt1l continue to be 106 feet as desigllatec ID the General Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 4 0 Public Fcuilities Plan 8011 Rood west Place and Intemate 5 BoI Rood East It1t ate 5 If Wi 1I 00feet I4lt 6 of lWllOr tIlU wIf Tn 6iMMSi ltl MI lit h ic WI q foot JrJIfJ It All 4 1001 sidewalk 6 1001 porkway 31ravel l e 4 1001 sidewalk 61001 parkway landscaped 3 Iravel r t I 35ft 116ft I J Painted Median 35ft I U lmale RighI aI way 106 ft Exhibll 4 4tProposed BonCross Section West of West Ploce 35ft I 4 001 sidewalk 61001 parkway 31ravelr 4 1001 sidewall 61001 parkway 3 travelr I e 116ft I 35ft Ullmate ol way 106ft 02131 Exhibit 44oP1Oposed Boll Road Cross Section Between West Place and Interstate 5 4 toot sidewalk 6toot parltway 3 travelr 13 troveI J Panted IoneI typical Median 35ft 116ft I 4 1oot sidewalk 6toot parkway 35ft Id I Ullmate ot way 106ft I ExhIbIt 4 4p Proposed Boll RoodCroa Section East of Interstate 5 e Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Plan e ClemenNne Street e Hast StreelAnahetn e Page 4 22 1 Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Clementine Street w1JJ serve two lanes of travel In each dl rection and w1JJ be widened from 60 feet to 87 feet to accom modate anew landscaped median north ofKateUa Avenue a fOOlj parkway 4 1001 sidewalk J 2 Iravellanes landscaped median 1 2 Iravellanes j 8fool parkway 4 tool l sidewalk j I 24ft 15ft 124ft I ot way 87 fI Exhibit 4 4q CemenNne Street CrossSection South of Katella Avenue the r1ght of way for Clementine Street Is proposed to to be be 87 feet In width Raster 3 travel lanes In each dlrection with a 16 footwide palnted median except at Katella Avenue and Pact1lco Avenue where It wid ened to accommodate add1tionalleft and right turn lanes Thls Is consistent with Its current designation as aPrimary Artertal HIghway In the Circulation Element or the Citys General Plan 4 1001 SIdewalk 61001 parkway 4 1001 lidewalk 6loot parkway j 3 travellanu typical j t o I I 35fHt 116ft I 35feel RIg ItaI way 106 It ExhIbIt 44t PropOIed Hostel SlrHIAnaheim BocMvOtd CIOSI SectIOn ---PAGE BREAK--- Tbe western portion of Convention Way Is currently 8eeig RUn 1I8 aprtvate street and no typical cross section Is pro posed at this time itlc Mvn ex rllliCt of Pac llcoANnue Is u 1 tbd lIulshown on the C lement of the General Plan i idd teratate 5 east to wereI Convention Wq Current plans call for three travel lanes In each d1rectlon except at Harbor Boulevard and Haster Streetwhere It WlIl be widened to accommodate addItIClDalleft and right turn lanes Bt t Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street alandscaped mecUan dIvIdIIIg the travel lanes Is proposed W1thln a 110 foot right of way A4 footwide Sidewalk behind a 6 foot parkway Is proposed on both Sides ofthe right of way Ex b1bIt 4 4t Future PaciAco Avenue B t Harbor Boule vard and Haster Street Cross Sect10n shows the p oposed conflguration B tt lc Haster Street and Interstate 5 Pac lClcohansltions as part of afuture 1 5 plan to an exclUSIVe in terchange accommodating traDslt vehicles Crom the pro posed HOV lanes on the 1 5 freeway ThIs Interchange WlIl be elevated Sound walls WlIl be constructed In this loca The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Convention Way f9 Pacifico A HOtO Bou eVotd and HCII Street Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan ic Convention Way will continue to serve trlXiiahelm Con vention Center In Its current r1ght Of wa lof 110 feet A landscape median of 18 feet Is p oVlded except where left turn lanes educe the median to 8 feet Three travel lanes nl are p OVIded In each d1rectlon and a Ia foot sidewalk area are depleted In Exhibit 4 Convention Way Cross Section The sldewalk has 4 foot landscaped cutouts prOVIded at the back of the sidewalk e 101001 31ravel j r sidewalk lanes lanes sidewalk landscaped 4 1001 J median J 4 1001 planting J planfing areas areas 10ft 36leel 36leel 10ft Righl al way 11 0 leel Exhibit 4 4S Convenllon Way Cross secllon e e Page 4 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- if The Anaheim Relor Specillc Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e Manchester A WaIf ee Page 4 24 6 Ioot landscoped parkwoy 4 rootj sidewalk 3 travel 3 Iravel lanes lanes landscaped median j 6 1001 landscapec parkway j 4 1001 sidewalk 36 feel typical 10 10 II 36 feet typical I Righl of way 11 Dfeel Exhibit 4 4t Future Pacifica Avenue Between Harbor Boule vard and Hoster Street CrQ Section ItH IIvt tion The crass section for thls portion of PacUlco has not been ftnaJ1zed Manchester Auenue Is d1v1ded Into four parts West ManchesterAvenuewhich extends In an east west d1recUon from Harbor Boulevard North Manchester Avenue which extends In a southeastern d1recUon from West Manchester Avenue adjacent to the freeway South Manchester which extends In anorth south d1rect1on between North Manches ter and the IntersecUon With Freedman Way and Manches ter Avenue south ofKateUa Avenue which extends In a southeastern d1recUon adjacent to the freeway south ofKa tena Avenue to the southern boundary of the Anahelm Re sort at the future Intersection With Padftco Avenue The West portiOn ofManchester Avenue W1I1 retain Its cur of y and parkwayIsldewalk confIguraUon and Is depleted In ExhIb1t 4 4uPropolled 6nrh ter Avenue West Portion Crose SectIon ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resarl Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Mane Avenue Ad Ocent to Interstate 5 North or Atto Way L n 2 trayellane 2 trayellane e Sv loot parkway landscaped r medicn parkway 51001 1 1 5 laot sidewalk J sidewalk I 15ft I q 24ft 24ft Right aI way 90ft I Exhibit 4 4uProposed Manchester Avenue West Por tion Cross Section The portion ofManchester Avenue adjacent to Interstate 5 w1ll be relocated as part of the Widening of the freeway and the Improvements proposed for the Interchange at KateDa Avenue and Interstate 5 The ultln1ate con1l guration for this portion ofManchesterAvenue whichoccurs adjacent to the freeway Is depleted In Exhibit 4 4v Proposed Manchester Avenue Adjacent to Interstate 5 North ofAlro Way Cross Section Btoot parkWOVj 4 1oot SIdewalk d 2ttayellOnes 2 ttayellanes e j j 5loot parkway j 25ft b4 25ft ol way 67 ft L Exhibit 4 4 oposedManchesterAvenue Ad Qcent to Inter ate 5 NOI1t1 of Aka Way Croa SectIon e 02141 Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e Manchester Avenue South Port on Moncne Avenue SouItI of Kotello A ue e Page 4 26 South Manchester Avenue the north south portion be tween Manchester Avenue adjacent to Interstate 5 and the Intersection with Freedman Way w1ll transition to match the Clementine Street Cross Section as depicted below 2 trovellones 2 travel lanes J8 loot parkway 4 loot J dewalk pa k g j 4 loot1 sidewalk I of woy 87 I Exhibit 4 4w ProposecJ Manchester A venue South Portion CrossSection landscaped median 24n 1 11sn I 24n I ManchesterAvenue south ofKateUa Avenue w1ll become a one way traveling south frontage road adjacent to Inter state 5 with three lanes of travel as depicted In the ExhIbit below 6loot parkwayJ 4 loot sidewalkr fd Mtnmum 3 trovellanes In one direction stoot parkway 1 Mlnmum 37 tt J Right of way 52tt ExhIbIt44x PropoI8d Monchestet A Adjacent to In tetstote 5SouttI of KoteIa Avenue CIOII5ecIIon ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re art Plan OrangewoodAvenue LocalsIMer Ato Way Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Orangewood Auenue will retain Its current right of way and travel lane configurations andIts designa tion as a Secondary Arterial Current plans call for four travel lanes except at Harbor Boulevard where It will be wid ened to accommodate additional left and right turn lanes 8 100lj parkway 5 1001 sidewalk 1 51001 travel lanes vary sidewalk 8 loot parkway J g l J I 32 ft 61 J 32 ft Right aI way 90 4 4y Orongewood Avenue Cross Secffon Alro Way will be modl1ied to have a 4 foot sidewalkwith a 6 foot parkway within Its current right of way and will reo taln Its deSIgnation as a Local Street 4 rO if 1 181 tWII t 1 Sh LJ UiXt UUI1 o tu u o a N I A OUL h v diti t1S d f i cJ 1 10 1 trevellone each TO 6loot parkway I 4 tool sidewalk j j 61001 parkway j Moot sidewalk 40ft ol way 60ft fJrhIbIf 4 tOpOI Local Street Alro Way Cross Sectton 02143 Page 4 27 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relort Plan I Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan 1 travel lane each 6 1001 parkway direction r 4 1001 sidewalkj 1 j 4 1001 sidewalk locol Street Coso Vlsto I 40ft Righl ol way 60 It I e Casa Vista W1ll be modUled to have a 4 Coot sidewalk with a6 Coot parkwaywithln Its current oC way and wUI re tain Its designation as aLocal Street Ji 1 1 PJ Q r g l eealJtirIU FAr c riSD gedisll l n Yo liiFiJ r1l ur 1J I7lit a J depi cd oel w Exhibit 4 4ooProposedLocal Street Coso Vista Cross Secllon Ox Road will be mod1fled to have a4 foot sidewalk with a 6 foot parkway within Its current right of way and will re tain Its designation as a Local Street The exhibit below shows the Ox Road local street crosssection condition 1 Iravetlone each d ec1ton J 6rool parkway j 4 1001 s1dewalkJ j6 loot parkway r Ioolsldewalk I locolStreet Ox ROOd 40ft ol way 60ft e 4 4a ropollKl LocalStreet Ox Road Croa Section Page 4 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Local Street VetmOllt A venue Local Street leY Street Vermont Auenue w1Il retain Its current right oC way park way sidewalk and travel lane configurations as well as Its designation as a Local Street The exhibit below shows the Vermont Avenue local street cross section cond1t1on 1 travel lone each dirrtion 5 1001 Iree well 9 loot Sidewalkj j 51001 Iree well j 9 1001 sidewalk 9n 48n 9n ol way 66 ft Exhibit 4 4ac Proposed Local Streel Vermont Avenue Croa Section Zeyn Streetw1ll be mod11led to have a6 foot parkway with In the r1ght of way destgnated on the General Plan ThIs street w1ll retain Its destgnatlon as a local street iii4blt A A lI 10 n TFiitl 1 II c 17 8 B t1vu 1 l cal fr t MnAS s Minn ati R AS fi cJ belo 6loot parkway J 4 1001 sldewalk j I 1 Iravellane eachj j 61001 parkway j 4 1001 sidewalk 40ft I ol way 60 ft 1 ExJt bIt4 4od ProptJIeQ Local Streel leI Street Cross Sec tIon 02145 Page 4 29 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e 4 5 Transit Plans e Page 4 30 To automobile traffic on local streets exiSting and proposed transit systems W1ll service uses within the Spe cific Plan area The maJn component of the existing system Is the Orange County Transll Authority OCTA bus service to the planning area Current bus routes are located on Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and Ball Road and pro vide regular service to the Anaheim Resort The existing Disneyland Resortmonorail also prOvides transll service In the area 4 5 1 The Disneyland Resort Projects The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan proposes to transport theme park visitors to the theme parks from the new public day use facilities by ahigh capacity pedestr1an way peoplemover movlng sidewalk system and grade sep arated pedestr1an overpasses In addition the existing rnorail wlll be expanded to provided additional transit 1m provements 4 5 2 Future Orange County Transit Improvements A number of Orange County transit projects are planned near the Anaheim Resort and W1ll have an Impact on devel opment In the area as follows 4 5 2 1 Central Orange County Flxed Guldewoy Project The cities ofAnaheim lrv1ne Costa Mesa Orange Fuller ton and Santa Ana among others In conjunction with aCTA have initiated astudy of the feasibility of anorth south llxed guldeway rail transIt project The route un der consideration would extend from lrv1ne Spectrum In the south to Anaheim Stadium and then north to the Ful lerton Amtrak Station WIthin Anaheim two alignments connecting Anaheim Stadium to Fullerton are being ex amined 1 west on Katella Avenue and north on Harbor Boulevard and 2 along the AT SF RaIlroad right of way to Cerrttos Avenue and then north on Harbor Boulevard 4 5 2 and HOV La Sy1lem OCTA and Caltrans are developing acountywide system of and commuter HaV lanes In freeway COrri dors These factltUes would be used by regtonal express busses regular buses shuttle buses vanpools and carpools Buses and other HOVs would access or egress these facilities at exclusive HaV ramps to streets or at destgnated at grade merge locations along freeways ---PAGE BREAK--- The AnaheIm Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan 4 6 Pedestrian Circulation Pian fXisiins On l htmt pAt It M Exclusive HOV ramps have been at Gene Autry Way Pacifico Avenue on the 1 5 and at Cerritos Avenue on the SR 57 lanes through the Interchange between 1 5 SR 57 and SR 22 are currently under con struction 4 5 2 3 Expanded OCTA Bus Service OCTA plans to systematically upgrade Its current bus service and Improve headways to meet future transit demand By the year 2010 the OCTA bus fleet may double to approximately 900 vehicles In add1t1on OCTA Is proposing new express bus routes for the and HOV lanes 4 5 2 4 Commute Roll Service The newly formed Southern CalIfornla Commuter Ra1l Authority SCCRA In conjunction With OCTA has three commuter for development through Orange County The Anaheim Resort w1ll benefit most the upgraded Los Angeles County to San Diego line whichIs pragrammed far dauble up to seven new stations and a af the existing eleven raund trip trains An Increase In the number af hatel rooms and the develop ment af new attractlans pedestrian activity In the Anaheim Resort ThIs w1ll enhance the urban character af the area and w1ll requlre that facWties be enhanced to meet the needs af these pedestrians Exhibit 4 6a Wustrates the pedestrian c1rculatian system Within the Spect1lc Plan area and areas On this plan pedestrian rautes have been as wdI as the locatlan afthe three pedestrian overpasses praposed In The DIsneyland Resort Plan and apotenttal faurth pedestrian overpass aver Katella Avenue The primary destlnatlans af pedestrians Within the Ana heim Resort Hatels restaurants and ather businesses In the Anaheim Resort The Anaheim Canventian Center raposed theme park described In The Disneyland Re sart Plan and The praposed East and West Areas described In The Disneyland Resart Specific Plan 02147 Page 4 31 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan fee wes ide of Iio triM c e lIJ3IW Smell DI neJjl Crlf W Mm 6 u L fo i Xl peafsm wJ OI UMSJ P ooc r 1100d n I I I 11 JI jij I 1 i 1 ill I 1 A L r i n Ii 3 j U i I Chll 11M mAh leyrJ i 1 8 I I 0 11 I I I c I I j j l 4A I I The Anaheim Re ort Plan Anaheim Callfomla 1 llie n PM nve nMeltif leD nectot l I l l S len Pedestrian Circulation Legend r limn ot Ananelm Resort o llXQ Anonelm Resort Plan Boundary Deslgnaled ror Future extensIOn In General Plan Circulation Elemenl Pedestllon Routes Pedestrian Overpass proposed In TIle DIsneyland Resort PIon III Polenflol Future Pedestrian OVerpass EB Ibi4 I Designated Future In General Plan Cltculatlon Elemen Cerr1tos Avenue wtJ De relocated 1 000 10 1 100 reet nortnerly aportion ot West Street w become a cul de sac West Place 11111111I1 Exhibit 4 6 edestt1an Clrcuatton Page 4 32 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resar Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan 47 Water PObhC li tili lies O par Yn 1t The City of Anaheim will provide water to the planning area Its sources Include both wells to tap groundwater resourc es and water purchased from the Metropolitan Water Dls tr1ct Based on preliminary estimates the average additional daily water consumption for the planning area will be about million gallons 0 The exiSting water supply system consists of numerous wa ter lines that surround or transverse the Specific Plan area Modification of this system will be necessary to provide wa ter at the pressures and In the quantities needed to supply the planning area The followtng Is alist of the improve ments to the water system that will be made as part of Implementation of theAnaheim Resort Specific Plan pIPe Replacement of the 8 lnch llfte In Clementine Street from Katella Avenue to Freedman Way with a 20Inch Replacement ofthe existing IOInchrein FreedmanWay from Clementine Street to Harbor Boulevard with a20Inch t e I f lU neAf 1I r seChon 0 Provision for anew well to be eea il at Clementine Street and Freedman Way thM ill BeRll n Hitl l v d26 iIlek lHie illClelReR4iinl itr t p pe Replacement ofthe existing 100Inch JlfM In Harbor Boule vard from HattU A to Freedman Way with a2oInch lI Co Mi P Replacement of the existing I O Inch In Harbor Boule vard from Freedman Way to Harbor Boulevard north of p pe Manchester Avenue with a 16lnch iIfte p p Replacement of the existing 12 lnch In Katella Avenue If f Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street with a 20 lnch lIRe and Replacement of the existing 12 lnch and 14lnch In West Street DIsneyland Drivefrom Ball Road to Katella Avo P P enue with a 20Inch 1IIle ExhIbit 4 7a Water System Improvements shows the lo cation ofthe proposed Improvements to the water system In and around the Plan area Water conservation Is an Important part ofthe Plan and will be achieved through numerous measures Intended to re duce water consumption Among the measures to be imple mented within the Specific Plan Area are the feHa lAg tile eJ tnt ftA iblC u lIJ bul AJe Dt I mi 0 11 ft llo 02149 Page 4 33 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e Ibid The Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan 1 11 J f I J I i r oo OO t t I k J C I L Y L i i l J II ij 1 20 diameter water line to replace 14 Bnes 16 dlometet water lineto i replace exiSting b era 12 inss a C A I IlJ A I ir l I i 1 u 1 Realignment of lines to fOllownew rood alignment I 1 J I 20 dJomer wotsr Ins to eplace 2fr dIOt netsr c o A The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim Callfomla Water System Improvements EB k itnItvenve A li g n jI aonnectio 1 irS Iclln i 4 I Legend L J Limit 01 Anaheim Resort Anaheim Resort Plan Boundary Oelignofed lorFuture extension In General Plan C culotton Elemenl Oellgnoled Futu eAlIgnmenlln General PIon C cutotlon Element New Waler Unea fcentlos Avenue wibe relocoled 1 000 10 1 100 eel northerly 0portion 01 West S r wHl become a cul de sac West Place Exhibit 4 7o Waler System Improvements Page 4 34 ---PAGE BREAK--- Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan The Anaheim Resort Plan Add Use of lo fl fnnk ler heU s in ir r A iDf 1 trs U e of dbl rr r ul h s rnl 4 8 Sanitary Sewer u of Low flow fittings Ilxtures and equipment toilets and i clvdi1 cw M urinals ui l I Use of self closing valves on dr1nk1ng fountains hJ UiL l l d nu l J 19iB1 tltIh IiI WHalS mI bli stir 5 TT r l TP on r irRgaYBA QV Q ardt s R oulnn it p t tllo 1 Use of efficient lITigation systems such as drip irrigation WI Jll and automaUc systems which use Blh lw sensors u e of r Water efficient Ice machines dishwashers clothes wash ers and other water using appliances Use ofirrtgation systems primartly at night when evapora tion rates are lowest Use ofwater conserv1ng landscape material wherever fea sible u e ofiLow low shower heads in hotels and ProVide information to the public in conspicuous places water conservation Inaddltion to these measures development in the Anaheim Resort Spec1flc Plan will fl T1I1R a adopt ed to Implement the State Of Cal1fO ea Water Conservatlon In LandscapIng Act AB 325 he t t ie LNl sf CKd e Treatment ofwastewater will be proVided by the County San ltation District ofOrange County CSDOC which oper ates Sanitation DIstrict Treatment Plant Number lin Foun tain Valley ThIs fac1l1ty will eventually receive wastewater generated by the planning area Currently programmed ex pansion ofthis fac1l1ty will be able to accommodate develop ment of the planning area In addltion the CSDOC may construct one or more fac1l1ties in the region that would eventually provide reclaimed water for landscape irrtgation purposes Average addltional dally sewage generation Is expected to be 2 2 mW10D gallons Mll 1 A iVI TvUlaateEl 8 Ii i 4 1IIa 17 11 1 pitr ExIsting sewers on streets generally carTy sewage south and west The CIty of Anaheim has prepared a comprehensive Master Plan of Sewers for the South Central Area a portlon of which includes the Anaheim Resort Specl1ic Plan area As part of the general Improvement to CSDOC infrastructure some of these Page 4 35 02151 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan l i A I u t b I I I i T TI i I i I l UL e IS diameter proposed Jorclel J sewerline QlIlDOQ t I I L j knetM j C A parallel 1 sewerline I I 1 1 If n A I i 12 21 diameter porollel sewerline 81S dlanet poroI eI 1 J r i I i c I i I l u I I i KA aJ gn t it aonnee1 ot i t S clff 12 15 dianetfH poro e sew I le II I 12 j I I The Anaheim Resort Plan Anaheim Call1omla Sewer System Improvements DesIgnated n a1 Plan C culallon EIemenI Avenue w be relocated 1 Il00 10 L 100 teet norlherly a porttan ot Wert Sheel w become a cuf desoc Wer Place o llDl 2lDl Ibid Exhibit 4 8o S4Jwer Smem Improvements e Page 4 36 Legend L linK al Anaheim Resort Anahem Resort Plan Boundary Designated lOt Fulute extension n General Plan C culallon E nl New SewLnes ect1an 01 Flaw EB II ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan sewers will be enlarged or parallel Unes will be constructed to hancUe Increased flows These Improvements will serve the planning area as well as other development In the City Some of these Improvements are planned for Unes outside the Specific Plan area Exhibit 4 8a Sewer System Improvements shows the location of the proposed Improvements to the sanitary sewer system In the Specific Plan area The ange County S lat rtuRst may construct one or more facilities to provide recla1med water for landscap Irrtgatlons purposes Exhibit 4 8 lists the new sewer Unes to be constructed or relocated s for development In the plann1ng area CounlJ S i onoo Oistrid of 02153 Page 4 37 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Existing Sewer System Deficiencies and Recommended Improvements for Year 2010 loca1ion Limits Existing Improvements Selected Diameter In parallel or Diameter replacement Ball Road West 51 to E Walnut 2 p 15 Ball Road Claremont to W Harbor 24 R 27 7 BaJl i1tlad kemon amgpc rge J 4 V u KateJla Avenue walnut 10 Ninth 24 Kalella Avenue West to Walnut 24 P 21 Kalella Avenue Harbor to 650 n EIWest 24 P 15 Katella Avenue 650 f1 ElWest 5t to West 5t 24 P 18 Manchester Avenue Palm 10 Harbor 15 P 12 Harbor Boulevard Manchester to N Freedman 15 P 12 Harbor Boulevard N Freedman to Katella 15 P 15 Katella Avenue Harbor to W Harbor 24 P 12 West Street N Cerritos to Cerritos 24 P 12 H bor oul d Wilkpto 0 1 P 5 7 erjlf O e I V ifken J6 BluJl6e 8 P 8 f 9 Iken wey e l f toft4 Jl Oe fey I a WillitnW WjOertltIY to rbqt 8 P 5 Orangewood Av Ninth to Harbor r nue Harbor Boulevard Convention to Orangewood 5 P 2 Wakefield Avenue JAt Viewto W Mt View 8 P 8 MtView Avenue Wakefield to Pearson 8 P 10 Mt View Avenue Pearson to Orangewood 8 P 12 OranQewood Av Mt View to Haster 0 P 8 nue Orangewood Ave Haster to Clementine 10 P 12 nue Orangewood Av Clementine to Harbor 10 P 15 nue P JiIIaudiJltl St tofl 811eim 1VO Of I I Mr Y 1Blvd t O 2 17 I 8 L on Sir 1mJMl 00 Midy to M 1W Y 8 P I I 1 I P S o G id Ln J6 Midwaj f P 8 I kel at IS o Aldw y9 to MlcjIIi y 8 I I t I N jIPalaia jrd to P Ad 8 I fP 8 BIvd alatQllo MI P d F EJo B cmor St b L wjI 1 8 P 8 1 S to 7G 8 V 1 t lJ Io Gol 6 Autryto Kfl 8 I P Ka A I Elo Ninth t to Nlmn l Oif to P1a 1 P 15 IIIN to BalJRd la II 8 E2LfCriaSt I Jfl P 8 l lIiege 0 Ball to BoHjrd 8 P J8 sy 10 QIIlol A 8 T 2 I t ChaIfI A to6o CMItI A Illf P if Stl hale1rtON rrito lf F PI II J IItol ad Sl 8 1 IT IjlJertly Qltv Ave tQN ilken lay 8 fP 8 I e Ce e 0 1t e Oe le te lett e Exnlbir 4 81 Sewer System Deflclencle and Recommend Page 4 38 adImprovemenrs for Year2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resart Speellle Plan 4 9 Storm Drain or lief A parl111el or relitf dr ill in O l io OY1 Jdnd O e J W TU 4 10 Electricity FiJJ J of he moly Rl ort Spu f PIA iJiJl r 1 1 dfm rtle Y1 N wQJt Ofproll M t 2 1 2 tI dn kll Mn vrv J 4Il flB3 COo kiloj olit haur n o n 1 f J bj 2010 Tht t fi Cd ne i reAU tlu nt J IJI J i SS Jli AJA 1 1f I tah f1 of fht AlIbi S 1f A f3 7 S rTI lIiM I lllt lJrf rt Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Storm water from the northem portion of the Specific Plan area will flow west In new or existing underground storm drains to the Anaheim Barber Channel located several hundred feet west of and parallel to Walnut Street Storm water from the southem portion of the plann1ng area will flow south to the East Garden GroveWintersburg ChanneL Eventually the storm water from the entire Specific Plan area empties Into the ocean at Huntington Harbor The folloWIng Is a list of the planned fac1llties to be con structed to handle the storm water flows from the Specific Plan area d fWbor ElovlevAl E4 A relief drain InIVermont AvenuC E Sotre A parallel drain In Ball Road A parallel draln In Cerrltos Avenue and In West Street Disneyland Dr1ve lJAlnulStrut A parallel drain In Katella Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard A parallel s drain In Harbor Boulevard and Manchester Avenue A parallel or upgrade s drain In Convention Way u I M e rv West Stree Jfu Orangewood Avenue ana C1 f m lil Pnt ut A rellef draln In Haster Street and Gene AuOy Way Pacifico Avenue All new development and or redevelopment projects shall AliI In the CItys Master Plan ofs DralI IIlllIld re lated Infrastructure Improvement Feel Programs to assist In mitigating storm drainage system deftdendes as de scr1bed In the Environmental Impact Report for the Specific Plan area will be prOVIded by the City ofAnahelm Public Utilities Department Electric DM slon utilities will be InStaJled underground In ac corciance With City Electrical ConstrucUon Standards Specifications the Rates Rules and Regulations and the Devdo moot Standards and GUldel1nes for the Anaheim Resort Tlt8l J TII i1A l1illl 881lt11 1Bl tilR af ele8tiRlMiS ifth A D e a F e af Aatlly 1g 1114 0 lrHnur r tt As pan of an existing City of Anaheim 5 year Capital Im provement Program s Utility Program the existing overhead electric utilities on Katella Avenue West Street Disneyland Dr1ve and Harbor Boulevard will be 02155 Page 4 39 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Ibid The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan ertRo l J t tr4 1 Q j 1 Ioe I r I 1 I C nrwA Relocated storm drain b I Ii t Proposed tOITTl drain to connect i J I to AnaheimBarber City Channel o l It q I l i I tt c Parallel t storm droln III J Ii P I J I I I 1 c L tpor llelOr I i upgradestolTTl II R 1 drain I A Parollel storm drain Proposed storm drains 1 Il 0NIllJ 1 1 I r I 1I iu I i A Parallel stOITTl drooln The Anaheim Resort Plan Anaheim California Storm Drain System Improvements EB o 2lXXl CennesAvenue w be relocaled 1000 la 1 100 leel noertv apor1lon 01 Wesl Slreel wiD become a cul desac Wes Place 4 9o Starm Drain System Improvements Legend C J LmW 01 Anaheim Resorl Anaheim Resort Plan Boundary Deslgnaled lorFuture Extension In General Plan Ckculatlan Elemenl DeslQnated Future AlQnmenlln General Plan Ckculatlon Element New Slorm Drain lines Dkec1lon 0 Flaw 11 Page 4 40 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan 4 11 Natural Gal S 08 130 erili h Thtr nAl 1111 11 m8TU n or 1 3 q 1 li 61 V 4 r Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan placed underground Where possible the will be completed prior to or at the same time the street im provements are done New lines constructed to serve the area will also be placed underground p Je t d no X of f gut 18 i1 91JIfUiRB M p n At The Disneyland Resort a new substation facility will be constructed at no cost to the City of Anaheim WithinThe Disneyland Resort boundaries The proposed substation will be engineered to meet the pro jected eleclr1cal demands of the Disneyland Resort The City ofAnaheim will serve the substation With new under ground transmission lines If the Disneyland Resort takes service at 69kv In order to conserve energy development may be required to Implement one or more energy saVing practices Among those which may be required for Ind1vldual projects are the follOWIng incorporation of design features Intended to reduce energy use Use of high efficiency air conditioning systems controlled by acomputeriZed management system including features such as avartable air volume system a 100 outdoor air economizer cycle sequential operation of air conditioning equipment In accordance With building demands tsolatlon ofair conditioning to any selected floor or floors Use of eleclr1c motors designed to conserve energy Use of special fixtures such as motion sensing light switch devices and compact fluorescent fixtures In place of Incandescent lights and Use ofT8 lamps electronlc ballast and or metal halUde or high pressure sodium for out door and parking lots C f4 j Natural gas for area will be deUvered by South ern CaUfomla Gas which maintains both standard and high pressure gas lines In the of the project At build out the Spec1llc Plan area will consume an additional i1 IW IliJl 1 yuye Wherever practical development Within the planning area will be required to Incorporate en ergysaVing means Into the project to reduce consumption of natural gas In addition many ofthe energy conservation measures described In Section 4 10 above will also result In natural gas saVings 02157 Page 4 47 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan phone rV le 4 12 TeleC318AU t1RieatieR5 e 4 13 Television Service 4 14 Solid Waste e Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Paclfic Bell or other phone service providers will provide telephone service to the Speclfic Plan area from existing lines ExiSting and future telephone lines within Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue and West Street Disneyland Drive public rights of way will be placed underground as part of the City of Anaheim s current five year Capital Im provement Program Although some of these lines may need to be expanded or improved to accommodate the increased load this expansion Can be easily achieved without disrup tion to existing customers Pacific Bell Can provide fiber op tics to facilitate high capacity services There are existing fiber optic servle es in Harbor Boulevard which can be ex tended h tlu f lI l tn Broadcast television ts provided by statics throughout the greater Los Angeles metropolitan region MultiVlslon Cable TV provides cable television service to the Anaheim area in cluding the planning area Durtng construction of street im provements existing cable television facilities will be l 1 0 ctben ise rtd 5i9 T1 relocated underl 1 ound J UtJ e ure h 1e evi io mell hA 1 0 1 e wo i u di rbed Solid waste from the pl g area will be collected by a City contracted disposal company Collected waste will be deposited at the Brea Olinda Alpha unincorporat ed Orange County adjacent to the City ofBrea Assuming a 25 reduction in waste by 1995 and a50 reduction in solid waste by 2000 as stipulated by the Cal1fomla Inte grated Waste Management Act of 1989 development with in the planning area will generate approx1mately 29 373 additional tons of solid waste per year approx1mately 80 5 tons of solid waste per day by 2010 In order to meet the requlrements ofthis law one or more solid waste reduc tion programs may be required of new development in the planning area including Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or conve nient locations for sorting and bins Facilitating cardboard recycling espec1ally in retaJl areas by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and baling Fac1lltatlng gJass espec1ally from restaurants by providing adequate space for sorting and storing Providing trash compactors for non recyclable materta1s whenever feasible to reduce the tOtal of solid waste and the number of required fOf collection vol ume Page 4 42 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan Pr81i Ag vu 1t cqellBg fLL taeles aesl iell ts Un 4 15 Public Services r 1 IlR J VI cdi Dl l t L uI t t u I t l J s aaliil pl 8RS mk f 11e Prohibiting curbside pick up W E h g l a l cdo t dl tpv cd uU 1phl UiJ Yla nM Etate anB t 6 1Jl u Fran fEt Q li A rAg llll i8M E IfJoJt Pl LAd Providing the following on going practices during project operations as feasible Usage of recycled paper products for stationery letter head and packaging Recovery ofmaterials such as aluminum and cardboard Collection of office paper for recycling Collection of foam cups for recycling and Collection ofglass plastics kitchen grease laser printer toner cartridges 011 batteries and scrap metal for recy cling or recovery Waste management mitigation measuresthat will be taken to reduce solid waste generation Include but are not limit ed to Detailing the location and design of on site facil Ities Providing on site recycling receptacles to encourage recy with an Federal State and CIty regulations for hazardous material dlspos and Participating In the CItys Recycle Anaheim program or other substitute programs as may be developed by the City The City ofAnaheim Fire Department will provide fire pro tection emergency medical response fire Inspection and other services to the plann1ng area The CIty FIre Depart ment In conjunction with the Utilities Department has set the minimum standards for water Dow for the ar ea In addition they will review all future development for compliance with CIty F1re Department standards Typical requirements Include the installation ofsprinklers In accor dance with the Anaheim Municipal Code preparation of emergency fire access and construction fire protection plans provtslon ofadequate access to structures for fire fighting vehicles and location of fire hydrants In convenient ly accessible locations Since development In the plann1ng area will Increase the number of service calls to the Fire De 02159 Page 4 43 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan e Add One di ana hI1Tud omf r U Joe o Jd 011 parAmedic orr1 4 e partment new development shall be required to participate in fair share funding of the following measures intended to improve fire protection Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units additional manpower equipment and facilities A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the fire Department to provide heavy search and res cue response capability and A medical triage vehJcle traller equipped with sufficient trauma dressings medical supplles stretchers etc to handle 1 000 injured persons and an appropriate storage facility The Anaheim Pollee Department prOvides pollee protection to the Specific Plan area The additional pollee service per sonnel needed for the development of the Anaheim Resort will be funded through annual tax proceeds and incremen tal growth in and around the Anaheim Resort 02160 Page 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Th Anaheim R orl Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 02161 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e e The Design Plan contaJns descriptions of the basic concepts that will help achieve the Specific Plan s fundamental goal of creating a unlfied resort identity for the Specific Plan ar ea Written text in thJs Section describes the fundamental design concepts while the drawings that accompany the text show how the concepts wm be implemented The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan has been coordinated with design concepts contaJned in the adopted Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Since the public streets are the inter face between the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and The Dis neyland Resort Specific Plan both Plans describe in detail the design of the public streets as well as the treatment of setback areas adjacent to public streets The emphasis in both plans is on creating unity through landscape design a standardized design vocabulary for streetscape elements such as light poles and directional signs and regulation of private property including standards for signs building heights and setbacks The streetscape elements and land scape concepts for the ultimate right of way are pre sented in this document and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan document will be considered by the City Council for the entire Anaheim Resort as a separate action The private property standards and concepts will be regu lated by their respective Specific Plan For ease of reference and to better depict the between the two Specific Plans theAnaheim Resort Specific Plan contaJns information about the treatment of all public streets that border or are withJn the Specific Plan area boundaries As a result there is an overlap in the informa tion contaJned in both Plans along the border be tween the two areas For example the description and illustrations of the design concept for Harbor Boulevard ap pear in both Plans The information in this Section is intended to supplement the Spec1flc Plan ZOning and Development Standards con taJned in Section 7 0 in the following ways First it de scribes the fundamental design ideas and concepts that are the basis for the standards and regulations This descrip tion ofthe basic concepts will assist in the interpretation of the intent of the Specific Plan in situations where several optJons may be consistent with the regulations Also it con taJns design gUidelines which would be considered too gen Page 5 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan eral to be standards or regulations but convey useful Information about the character and quality of development antiCipated Within the Specific Plan area Finally this See tton contaJns sketches and cross sections that show what the physical appearance of important condittons In the Spe cific Plan area should be if the standards regulal10ns and guidelines are implemented In accordance With this Sectton and Sectton 7 0 This Secl10n also contains regulattons from Section 7 0 Zoning and Development Standards which help illustrate the design ideas and concepts By showing how the two work together the Intent of the Spe cillc Plan can be conveyed In a more comprehenstve man nef In adcl1tton to this Introductton this Sectton is Into eight parts includIng Design Plan Objectives Design Concepts Landscape Concept Plan Comprehensive Identity Plan Design Criteria for the Public Realm Design Criteria for the Setback Realm Design Criteria for the Private Realm and Design Plan Reference Summary 5 1 Design Plan Objectives The Design Plan is Intended to achieve three prInCipal de sign objectives They are Create visual contlnuJty between the Specillc Plan area and the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specillc Plan area Create a high quality VIsually appealing pedestrian ori ented environment and Create landscape and design standards and regulations to reinforce the area s Identity Following Is adescription of each of these objectives 5 1 1 Create Visual Continuity Between the Specific Plan Area and the Adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area An Important objective of the Plan Is 10 VIsually tie the Spe cI1lc Plan area to the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area through the consistent use of landscape and oth er streetscape elements IncluclIng signs gateways lights and other elements The Anaheim Resort will then have a more unlJled Identity and there will be asmooth poge 5 4 02163 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plcn Section 5 0 Design Plan e 5 2 Design Concepts e from the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and The Dis neyland Resort Specific Plan Area 5 12 Create a High Quality Visually Appealing Pe destrian Oriented Environment A second design objective is to create a high quality pedes trian environment that reinforces the urban character of the Specific Plan area With the potential development of the new theme park and construction of the new public parking facilities In The Disneyland Resort and the in crease In the number of Visitor accommodations both with In The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and this Specific Plan there w1ll be a measurable Increase In the number of pedestrians In the area Anticipated improvement of the Anaheim Convention Center w1ll also contribute ly to the Increase In pedestrians This w1ll help support an active street environment for shopping dining and lodging within walking dJstance from the theme parks and the Ana heim Convention Center The Design Plan addresses the needs of pedestrians by Establishing the size and location of pedestrian walks Defln1ng the type of landscape necessary to create ape destrlan scale and ProVidJng for other amenitles such as dJrectlonal signs Intended to enhance the overall pedestrian experience 5 1 3 Create Landscape and Design Standards and Regulations to Reintarce the Area s Identity The Design Plan also proVides landscape standards for the setback areas and along the publ1c streets that pass through the center of the Specific Plan area In order to re Inforce the overall consistency of the area s Identity The setback landscape will also help provide a continuity ele ment In front of existing that have avariety of ar chJtectural styles In the Design Plan Includes design gUldel1nes Intended to support the overall quallty of development In the Specific Plan area by sound crttena for prtvate development The concepts below are the basic design policies for the Specific Plan area and form the basis for implemen tation of the Design Plan They address the objectives of the Design Plan In Section 5 1 and Include a 02164 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Ancheim Resort Specific Plcn Section 5 0 Design Plan Ufifize me Stteels IOf Lanoscape Page 5 6 tion of the important site factors which will alTect mentation of the design concepts 5 2 1 Transform and Unify with Landscape The Anahelrn Resort presents a Visually confuSing idenl1ty due in part to the variety of uses abundance of large signs varying architecturalquality presence of overhead utilil1es mix of large and small parcels in close proximity and lack of consistent landscaping The primary concept of the Design Plan is to transform the Visual character ofthe Anaheim Resort with landscape The primary component of this transformal1on will be the streetscape which will include trees and shrubs as well as man made elements such as light fixtures benches entry gateways and signs Setback areas on private land between the public street and buildings will also be important in this transformation In some instances the Visible portions of and private land behJnd the setbacks will also playa role in the character of the Specific Plan ar ea 5 2 2 Create a District with a Civic Scale The Anaheim Resort encompasses approximately 1046 acres a large urban area in which to create a un1fted Iden tity In add1t1on many of the streets within the Anaheim Re sort are wide and provide important regional circulation linkages Finally the number ofvisitors to the area Is a1 ready slgn1ftcant and will grow with development of the Anaheim Resort and The Disneyland Resort Spec1ftc Plans Consequently the character of the Anaheim Resort as a whole must be grand in scale to complement the size and importance of the area as aworld class destInatton resort The Design Plan proposes creating a grand c1v1c scale prl mart1y with large scale landscape plantIngs and architec tural regulations IncludJng heights and setbacks 5 2 3 Emphasize the landscape on the Public Streets Most visitors to the Plan area and the adjacent Dis neyland Resort Spec1ftc Plan area will experience the area s streets at some time durtng their visit either from automo bUes other vehicles such as the pedestrian way people mover moVlng sidewalk system and or monorall discussed In The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan or on foot Nearly 02165 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 1t I Y Li i j 1 i i I 11 j 1 l I J I i t nk u u n r I i i i 11 Creote Distinct Differences 11101 help Orient Visi fors Visually n I Tne Central COfe of me AnOl lelm Resort all of the publicly owned land within both areas is con tained within the street rights of way or In easements though the space available for landscaping within the pub lie right of way will be somewhat limited because of the need to serve vehicle and pedestrtan circulation Streets and their edges furnish the primary space In which landscape can be placed to transform the identity of the Anaheim Resort Where new rights of way are being creat ed sufficient space will be provided within the right of way to accommodate the proposed landscape 5 2 4 Orient Visitors Visually Visitors to the Specific Plan area and the adjacent Disney land Resort Specific Plan area often come from great dis tances and lack familiarity with Anaheim and the Anaheim Resort These visitors need well defmed visual cues that ori ent them to their location within the area In addition there Is great variety In the different uses and functions of the spaces within the Specific Plan area and the scale of the spaces often varies as well The Design Plan differentiates the major streets within the Specific Plan area by establish Ing landscape treatments that will help create a unique character for each 5 2 5 Create a Recognizable Center for the Anaheim Resort In coordination with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan the Design Plan establishes an area known as the Central Core will have specIal desIgn standards It Includes parcels located on Harbor Boulevard between Interstate 5 and Orangewood Avenue and on Katella Avenue between Interstate 5 and Walnut Street The location of the Central Core Is shown In the dIagram to the left For parcels adJa cent to Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue specIal de sign standards will apply to setbacks and streetscape treatments that are different from other locations In the Anaheim Resort 5 2 6 Coordinate Streetscape Improvements with other Improvements The construction of the streetscape Improvements In the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will be coordinated to the extent feasible with public and private improvements such as the of uUIJties The Intent Is to Install Page 5 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Public Realm Sotl ack Realm Private Realm I Ultlmot ol woy I I BuilOOOle 1 POtlIOl l I Bvildi ettlOCk The Three Elements of trle Design Hierar Chy The Public Realm The Setback Realm and me Private Realm 5 3 landscape Concept Plan Page 5 8 SeCtion 5 0 Design Plan public streetscape improvements as soon as possible while minimizing the need to disrupt these improvements once theyve been installed 5 2 7 Establish a Clear Design Hierarchy The Plan specifies three distinct levels of design hierarchy called the Public Realm the Setback Reaim and the Prlvate Realm The intent is that the most visually prominent areas have the most rigorous design controls and that the design of less visually prominent areas be more flexible Areas within the ultimate public right of way will be called the Public Realm This visually prominent area is the most precisely dermed and designed of the three Realms As pre viously stated the CityCouncil will consider adoption ofthe Public Realm concepts which are presented in thls docu ment as well as The Disneyland Resort Speclfic Plan docu ment for the entire Anaheim Resort as a separate action The Setback and Private Realm concepts are regulated for the respective Specific Plan areas by the Anaheim Resort and Disneyland Resort Specific Plans The Setback Realm includes the prlvate property between the ultimate of way and the required minJmum bu1lding setback Since these areas are not quite as to the overall char acter of the Speclfic Plan area as the Public Realm the plan provides for more flexibility in their design The Private Realm which includes areas behind builcl1ng setbacks ad Jacent to public streets will be guided by design crlterla that are the most flexible of the three realms but st1ll con tain Important design guidelines intended to enhance the overall Identity ofthe Specific Plan Area Development ofthe Private Realm will occur with less predictability than the other Realms and so less speclficlty Is provided in the de sign guidelines Additional discussion of the three Realms can be found in Subsections 5 5 5 6 and 5 7 This section of the Design Plan the landscape de sign principles for the Speclfic Plan area that will contribute to the unlfied environment envisioned by the Plan It con talns of thebasic landscape concepts crlterla for the selection of plant material and general planting de sign guidelines for the publlc streets and adjacent setbacks which the Plan calls the Public Realm and the Setback Realm The Landscape Concept Diagram Exhibit 5 3 4a 02167 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- r The Anaheim Resort Specific Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan e e Small scale landscape elements tor the pedestrian scale large scale J landscape element tor the vehicular scale ee loscope Reflects Scale EL shows how the principles have been applied to the impor tant streets within the Specillc Plan area and landscape cross sections and elevations illustrate the basic landscape design principles The landscape design drawings found In this Section in cluding the landscape cross sections are Intended to illus trate basic landscape design concepts and unless needed to illustrate a concept described In the text do not contain dimensions or other detailed information about street right of way widths or minimum setback clJmensions informa tion about street rights of way and minimum setbacks can be found In Section 4 3 Vehicular Circulation Plan and Section 7 0 Zoning and Development Standards respec tlvely Subsection 5 8 Design Plan References Summary contains detailed technical cross sections which show ail el ementslandscape right of way and building setbacks together on a single page with key dimensions and land scape descriptions 5 3 1 landscape Concepts The follOwing landscape concepts are Intended to derme the character of the landscape proposed far the Anaheim Re sort 5 3 1 1 Unlly and To achieve the objectives of the Design Plan landscape planting must create an overail unity while allowing di versity to create dJjferences between places This will be achieved by establishing aplanting design system In which basic elements are repeated In an orderly regu lar way while the elements vary to respond to particular situations Exhibit 5 3 1 1a Is an example of how two landscape treatments can have the same planting design system but vary In the use of materials to create distinct places 5 3 1 2 Use Plant Material to Create Scale It Is Important that the scale of landscape re flect the scale of place they are Intended to enhance For example major streets and entries that will be vlewed pri marily from automobiles will require alandscape treat ment that Is grander In scale and texture than areas Intended solely for pedestrians When there are overlap ping needs that Is when both pedestrian and automobile 02168 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Page 5 10 Unity Regularly spaced elements Horizontal and verticollayers of elements Lorgescale repetition Of elements Diversity Size scale and type of elements varies Arrangement 01 elements vories Pattern 01 elements vories Exhibit 5 3 1 a Unity and Diversity scales must be accommodated the planting design will address both needs 5 3 1 3 Establish 0 Recognizable Streetscape Geometry Throughout the Anaheim Resort landscape elements in cluding trees and shrubs as well as man made elements such as light fixtures will be arranged In regular patterns that establish order and a recognizable geometry The patterns will vary to create dillerent effects and will help d1fferentlate one location from another Generally street tree will feature regularly spaced trees and the same tree will be used consistently for considerable ofthe same street Changes In the variety of tree or the geometry of the planting design may occur when a street changes In WIdth changes direction or crosses an other Important street Informal masses of trees will only occur In the Public Realm where the total WIdth of the combined landscape area In the Public Realm and Set back Realm exceeds forty feel Planting designs In which trees are scattered randomly are inconsistent WIth the in tent of thJs concept 5 3 1 4 Define 0 Plant Palelle Another way the Plan will create a unlJled Identity Is by the plant matertal that will be used In the Ana 02169 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Q a 0l 0 C Q 0 Q 5 g Qj Layered Lonascope Creotes Deptfl helm Resort especially within the areas visible from the street the Public Realm and the Setback Realm The plant palette emphasiZes plants which will have a positive visual lmpact and are well adapted to the Specific Plan ar ea Many of the recommended plants are typical of South ern California gardens and emphasize the special quallties of plants that only grow in moderate subtropical climates Palms broad leafed evergreens such as Euca lyptus and exotic flowering shrubs such as the Bird of Paradise are typical of the kinds of preferred plants A complete list ofthe plants for use in Plan area is included in Section 5 8 4 5 3 1 5 Layer Landscape to Create Depth To create an illUSIon of greater depth in narrow spaces throughout the Specific Plan area and to add further va riety landscape will be planted in layers The layers will include plants in both the Public Realm and the Setback Realm Layers will be expressed vertically by the varying heights of plant material street lights and other land scape elements layers will also be expressed horiZontally by establishing several distinct planting areas with con SIstent setback relationships The margin graphic illus trates the layered landscape concept Section 5 3 2 contains planting guidelines which establish the planting desIgn criteria for creating a layered landscape It is sup plemented by the plant palette in Section 5 8 4 which recommends speclfic plants 5 3 16 Contrast Plant Material for Diversity and Balance To create diversity landscape planting desIgn will often rely on contrasting one plant material with another The types of contrast will include form large vs small tall vs short narrow vs broad rigId vs loose texture coarse vs fine lush vs sparse open vs closed and color dark vs light gray vs green This contrast will be expressed in the Public Realm for example with street tree plant Ings that consist of alternating tall narrow trees such as palmS with short broad trees such as a small or medIum sized canopy tree There will also be contrast between the planting In the Public Realm and the adjacent Setback Realm For example aformal planting of regularly spaced palms in the Public Realm mIght be complemented by 02170 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plart plantings In the Setback Realm of masses of eucalyptus or pines with less regular forms 5 3 1 7 Colortul Plants to Emphasize a Festive Atmosphere Colorful plant materials will be used throughout the Ana heim Resort to help create a festive cheerful atmosphere Where appropriate nowerlng trees may be used as well as nowering shrubs and groW1d covers These colorful shrubs and ground covers will often be planted In large masses of the same plant material In order to create a more dramatic lmpresslon The types of colorful plants will be varied so that color is apparent throughout the year The preferred color for nowertng plants will be deep ly colored reds oranges yellows and purples The use of plants with pale colors Including pale blue pink and off white will be limited 5 3 2 Plant Material Selection and Use The purpose of this subsection Is to Describe the basic plant selection criteria for the plants that will be used In the Specific Plan area Describe the role each type of plant tree shrub ground cover will play In establishing the overall character of the Specific Plan area and Identify In ageneral way where and how each type will be used The information In this subsection Is supplemented by a de ta1led plant palette In Section 5 8 4 which contains aUst of plants recommended for uSe In the Specific Plan area The purpose here Is to provide the rationale that serves as the the basis fot plant palette 5 3 2 1 Basic Selection Crfferio The desirable attr1butes of plants to be used In the Speclf Ic Plan area include Drought tolerant Reasonably low in maintenance Relat1vely free from disease and pest infestation Outstanding In some characteristic such as fonn color bark etc Unlikely to be familiar outside subtropical areas Evergreen Exotic In appearance Page 5 12 02171 L e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e e Moderate or fast In growth and Suitable for use around people The Intent is to establish an overall appearance that is recognizably Southern Californian In character There is virtually no list of plants that could be developed that would completely satisfy all of these conditions The Intent is to provide alist from which plants can be select ed that will provide the best plants to respond to the needs of different uses functions In the Specific Plan ar ea as well as the flexibility to be used In avariety of dif ferent situations 5 3 2 2 Tree Selection and Use Criteria Trees will be the backbone plant material of the planting design because ofthe size and widespread presence In the street rights of way and setback areas The following de scribes the different types of tree fonns that will be used throughout the Specific Plan area and the criteria that will be used to detennlne how they will be used Small canopy trees Small canopy trees are Intended for use where it is desirable to create amore Intlmate scale such as along narrow streets or In pedestrian areas where a contrast with a larger tree will help reinforce the layered landscape concept or to contrast with a tree with a different fonn On wide streets where the sep aration between trees from one side of the street to anoth er or from a parkway to amedian planting is thirty feet or greater smallcanopy trees should always be combined with medium or large canopy trees Small canopy trees will have a mature height of at least twenty feet but not more than forty feet Their mature spread will approximately equal their height Along streets WIth regularly spaced trees small canopy trees will be planted at arate of one tree for each twenty to thir ty lineal feet of frontage spreading trees may require a somewhat wider spacing MedIum canopy trees Medium canopy trees may serve the same purposes as either the large or small canopy trees Typically they will have amature height of at least thirty feet but will not typically exceed sixty feet Their mature spread will approximately equal their height Along streets with regularly spaced trees medium canopy trees 02172 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Page 5 14 will be planted at a rate of one tree for each twenty five to thIrty five lineal feet of frontage spreading trees may re quire a somewhat wtder spacing Medium canopy trees may be used onlocal or secondary streets but should not be used alone on arterial roads or other streets greater than sixty feet wtde unless there is a landscaped median Large canopy trees Large canopy trees will be used on ar terial roads to help reinforce the grand civic scale of the Anaheim Resort landscape They are intended to be large scale elements that create astrong positive visual im pression Their mature height will not be less than fifty feet and may exceed eighty feet For the smaller trees in this category the spread will approximately equal the ma ture height while in larger trees the spread will typically be 50 to 75 of the height Along streets wtth regularly spaced trees large canopy trees will be planted at arate of one tree for each thirty to forty lineal feet of frontage spreading trees may require a somewhat wtder spacing Large canopy trees may also be used in setback areas that exceed twenty feet in and may be planted in mass es Vertical and Pyramidal trees Vertical trees have amature height that dramatically exceeds their mature Ver tical trees will have aratio ofheight to not less than 4 I but which may in the case of certain varieties of palm exceed 20 1 Vertical trees will range in height from 30 to 100 feet when mature The spacing of vert1cal trees will typically be from eight feet to thirty feet on center for streets on which they are regularly spaced depending on the ultimate sIZe and spread of the specific tree When the prtmary purpose Is screenlng vert1cal trees will be ever green and will be spaced so that the mature trees form a dense V1sual barner When used in the PubUc Realm ver tical trees will generally be used in combination wtth can opy trees especially In areas with pedestrians who will need canopy trees to provide shade Vertical trees are es peCially useful In narrow setback areas as acontrast with lowergrOWIng canopy trees or shrUbs to createthe layered landscape Vertical and pyramidal trees are intended to serve a vari ety of purposes Among these are 02173 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e Screening views of adjacent uses or property Establishing regular easily recognizable geometrIc pat terns and Providing a dramatic vertical expressIon that stands out from the surrounding landscape PyramIdal trees have a characterIstic shape like a pyra mId and benefit from having space that their low er branches to touch the ground Many needle leafed evergreens such as pine and cedar trees belong to thIs category Pyramidal trees w1IJ be used as screens as large scale backdrop in formal rows Within setbacks or where space as large specimens i e e 5 3 2 3 Shrub Vine and Ground Cover Selection and Use Criteria Tlus subsection explains the role that w1IJ be played by shrubs Vines and ground cover to support the basic de sIgn established by the trees Shrubs Shrubs w1IJ serve several main design purposesto reinforce the basIc landscape plan Including the follow lng Screening views of surface parking lots service areas trash enclosures and other sIghts that detract from the garden like character envisIoned for the area or to pro vide prtvacy for pool areas outdoor eating areas and pa tios assocIated with ground noor hotel rooms Providing a phYSIcal barrier to dIscourage pedesUians from crossing streets mid block or to dJrect pedestr1an and vehlcular trafilc and Introducing an IntermedJate to low layer Within a layered landscape To create a stronger Impact shrubs w1IJ be planted In large masses dominated by a single specIes They w1IJ of ten appear as either loose unclipped or formal clipped hedges ofconsIstent heIght that may vary from two feet to more than fifteen feet hlgh Shrubs that are very low grow Ing less than two feet tall and that spread widely will be used as a ground cover Vines Vines will be used for the follOWing main purposes Creating acloak to cover walls and For exam pie cUnging Vines will be used on parking facUlties buJId ee 02174 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Page 5 16 ings and walls to enhance building elevations and w1II help discourage graffiti Creating vertical and hanging gardens Vines w1II be trained to the trunks of palms in order to enhance their appearance at the pedestrian level and will be used in planters on parking facilities or other buildings Vines Will also be used on garden structures such as arbors and trellises especlaJ Jy where limited planting area precludes a more traditional planting of trees and shrubs and Establishing asprawling ground cover in large areas where the Vine s growth can be contained in the available space Ground Couer In addition to spreading low groWing shrubs and sprawling Vines ground covers include turf and other grasses annuals and other varieties of plants that do not generally exceed two or three feet In height at matur1ty Generally ground covers w1II be used to create a green or colored blanket over the ground They w1II be planted so that large areas have a unJionn appearance The use of turf as a ground cover will be to partic ular areas where Its smooth green manicured appear ance and ability to accommodate light pedeslr1an traffic Is needed Large areas of landscape w1II be planted With drought tolerant ground covers in order to reduce water usage and long term maintenance costs 5 3 3 Layered Landscape Design Criteria ThJs subsection descr1bes in more detail the layered land scape concept and proVIdes cr1ter1a that w1II be used to de sign areas in the Setback Realm designated to have a layered landscape treatment Since planting in both the Public Realm and adjacent Set back Realm Will be needed to create alayered landscape successful Implementation requires that planting in both reinforce each other As aresult setback landscaping w1II vary on the treatment of adjacent public land scape Implementation oflhe layered landscape Is most Important in two areas along Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard the two major streets With1n the Central Core as an addi tional deVIce to create aun11led appearance and adjacent to large parking facilities will benefit from the artic 02175 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Spectfic Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan e ulatlon of the building facade provided by the variation in the size and height of plant materiaL Such effective articu lation for these buildings would be difficult to provide only with architecture While construction of the layered landscape in the Publlc Realm w1ll be achieved in large continuous sections of street layered landscape in the Setback Realm w1ll be con structed in smaller pieces as individual parcels develop or are renovated Achievement of the layered landscape look w1ll depend onthe successful enforcement ofthe concept on numerous parcels over anumber of years The length of the street frontage of individual parcels is the most Important factor that w1ll influence Implementation of the layered landscape Parcel frontages of more than five hundred lineal feet are long enough to provide the vartatlon needed to create the layered landscape look within a single parceL wh1le frontages of less than three hundred feet are too short to provide much vartatlon Therefore areas that have many parcels with short frontages w1ll require special consideration Exhibits 5 3 3a and 5 3 3b illustrate dia grammatically the criteria for creating layered landscape based on the length of parcel frontage Cons Ient slreet Iree planting forms layer s in Public Realm typical Vertical or canopy tree greater Ihan SO It loll 01 maturity Minimum length ISO It f Min length Minimum length 100 It SO It TOll shrub or small canopy tree 1025 It toll at maturity Exhibit S 3 3olayered landscape Design Criteria tor Praperlies with Frontages Greater than 300 Feet Medium shrub 5 15 It toll at maturity No minimum length for ground covers e 02176 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Page 5 18 ConSistent street tree planting torms Within Setback Realm each property layer s In Publ c Realm tYPical J must match the layered landscape of one of Its adJocent neighbors Property A Property 8 Property C Exhibit 5 3 3tLayered Landscape Design Criteria for Properties with Frontages Less than 300 Feet The width of the landscape setback will also affect the cre ation of the layered landscape In order to create a layered landscape there needs to be at least two horizontal or two vertlcallayers of landscape ThJs means that In narrow set backs 1020 feet wide the selection of plant material Is Ukely to be different than for medium 2030 feet or wide greater than 30 feet setbacks WIder setbacks permit the use of a larger canopy or pyramidal trees or will allow more than three layers In the Setback Realm alone See Section 5 6 6 Min1mum Landscape Requirements for size and number of trees In the required setback Exhibit 5 3 3c il lustrates diagrammatically the criteria for creating layered landscape based on setback width 5 3 4 landscape Concept Diagram The Landscape Concept Diagram In Exhibit 5 3 4a shows the dlfferent landscape treatments proposed for each of the major streets In the area as well as the location of the lay ered landscape treatment of setback areas This Diagram Is Intended to illustrate the overall planting design concept and does not show the actual size or placement of trees and other landscape elements 5 3 5 landscape Cross Sections The folloWIng landscape cross sections are Intended to pro vide a general overview of the dlfferent landscape treat ments that will help create the un1fy1ng Identity for the Anaheim Resort They also show the apprOXlmate location 02171 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e h icot plont rr erIOI envelope lOIQer scale plonTs snould be usee on wiele setcocks Allelnale use or medium scale plont typiCal l I 1 1111 l l 2 l 1 25n Mlnmum of 2 horIZontal end J vertlcel loyelS In nOHOw selbOCk oreos Minimum Of 3 horIZontal end 3 rtlColloy s In medium WidTh setbOck OtllOs Mininlum of 3 honlonlol end 3 vertlCel lelVers In wiele elDock oreos Eoch Ioyer be Ioroc scoped The number end sIZe 01 tr lraoll be bolonced between oJllOye s See 5 6 6 6 30 TI Density Pion 101 sIZe onO numbe of trees In In cock 018 11 e Exhibit 5 3 3c ayered landscape Setback Widtfl Criteria ofthe Publlc Realm Setback Realm and Private Realm on each street In the Specific Plan area In thls way they pro vide a key to Sections 5 5 5 6 and 5 7 which contain more detailed Information about each Realm including the role of each Realm In creating anoverall unifying Identity and ade scription of the components of each respective Realm The crosssections are not Intended to Illustrate every con dition that may occur WIthin or adjacent to the street of way nor do they contain setback and of way di mensions Section 5 8 1 contains more detalled information about these other topIcs and also serves as asummary of the concepts presented here e 02178 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ibid The Anaheim Resort Specific Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan OOMfy boe 1 V rne lf I The Anaheim Resort Pion Anaheim California legend Landscape Concept Diagram r for Anaheim Resort Public Realm Fml 1J l 20Cll t EB North o Destgnated Future AJlgl Y nent In General Pion Element rOC8ttltOS Avenue wtIl be relocated 1 COO to 1 100 teet nortt1erly a portion or West Street wMl become 0 cui desac est Aoes ji Nl lmICJfO UmIl ot Anaheim Resall Anaheim RllsaIl Ran Bounday Designated tor Future Extension In General Plan CIlculotlon ElemCll t Sma Meclum or laroe Canopy Trees see text Palm or Verllcal Tree SlTeet wt1h landscape MecSan LandsCape Cross Section Locatlon not diagram does not showlocal Strt locotions Extl bif 5 3 4oLandscape Concept Diogram tor Anatleim Resort Public Realm Page 5 20 02179 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort SpecifiC Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan levered IOno COpe of lrees 5I lIlltJ onolOI glouno cover Verl eollle 1 ll l vl les planl O 01 boa Inurv j lwo leer 32 on centel rypiCol Medll m orlarge canopy Ilees illparkwoy ono j meOlOn rn ty lwo feel 32 on eenl f typiCal I peciOllignl tixTures wlln Plonlll lQ on ground 10 boMers 1 ono COnsGl ofbanilt meoen fyp OI ilfounel cover and Of I Ream 5eltlock Aeorn I m publiCReorn Exhibit 5 3 5oLondscape Cross Section A HOlbor Boulevard Between Manchester A venue and Orangewood Avenue SelbQ Q OO O ShlUtlS wI ond orouncl cover P o IIO Side IQ vemoI oncl oono Oj be plQ lle l1 l mlnil num Cl ll ovn IIUtnMlOw m I I I m Exl1iOlf 5 3 5I Londscope ClOSS Section B HOIOol Bou evold Between 5 and Vermont A venue 02180 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The AnaheIm Resart Specific Plcn Section 5 0 Design Plan lovered lOt lds ooe r1 seIOOC 01 rrees srUUOI grovnd cover and Ivrt DouOle lOW 01 DOle Palms 1wenty toUl leel U Ot lCet ller j SpeClOllognl fixlures Cnnersln pottwoy ana typeal love eo lonascoce in selback conSlS1S C lIees snrves grovnd covel end Ivrl Double rowol Dole Palms lwenly 24 Joneenrer Grour d cover may lncl oe Mr ground covel orSNubS 5 P oom P P OiCReolm Exhibit 5 3 5c Londscope Cross Section C Kotello Avenue SelboClr landscape 10 consist of hees shlubs glound eover ana or tul1 planling design to be lOyefed landscape Tlees In pallcwoy and median fa be legulorly spacea meaium canopy If s lanascape on ground may c of shrUbS glounct CoYer ana Of turf ondmov be bermed Pubic Ream Setback Room Room Exhibit 5 3 5dlandscope CrossSection D WalnutStreet 02181 Page 5 22 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e Sell lOCk londloCCpe 10 or lrees lrul lS llround coyer end orIur plonht lll ees n 10 ce lOyeree IOneloCope PedeSlrOnsoClewolk Slre l r es in PorkWOV1IJ cons s 01 J C POC O CO l j Exhibit 5 3 5eLandscape Cross Section E West SIreet Disneyland Drive North of Boll Rood PuOfcReam m SelDock m IOndscope 10 COnalsl or11 5 stllUl lS glDUnd co r end Ol lUff Pedeslllon wOll Sh llr S in pol twQy l Oncl medlOn fO coruat 01 01fnolng COllfe S end medun Of feIIQ CO IOPY If S PlOnfll lQl Qr glCUncl moy W lClude stwul ls g cund CO Oncl 0l1 Ull 1 PutlIca am I I Aeom Aeam A NMyIOnd llll Ofl SoKtc n Exhibit 5 3 5f Landscape Cross Section F Wesl Slreet Disneyland Drive North of Katella Avenue e 02182 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan SelOQer 10nlSeo vo e ceeoro ng 100010 1 01 UHHe SecllOn 5 11 2 r M C umorlOrgeccnODyllee 10 O l l o r o 10 10 01 010 oor OY 0 MeaOOl lVOl j m I PuoliC Ileo 0 m WCWlII1 51 CII oClI tr t be l l1Qn 110 10 0 00 1 1011 011 5 11 1 Ana ReIOfI tr wll be DlDl lleeJ III11 Exhibit 5 3 5g Londscope Cross Section G Boll Rood j layered loncUcQOe DOCk 10 01 1Sl VUDS 10l0 M 1dCOvel and Cll 1 Irt j plonlinQ 10 Connl or oll rno vel hcolll onc r smdl 01 meclUtn canopy on glound may R1I r J grOUtlO COvet ond c wIUl I Narl orlta 1a piOtIli lOlO A e potenllOl c 01 pedes Ian CCll lOPY II woy IhNDL vnes InOfeI gro n lCO 4I lOewOIt 0I Id c w 1 I m Sceclle nc w1I OI ItOtelDA Se 1M Anonem hIoIt SDeClC Exhibit 5 3 5 ondscope Cross Section H Clementine Street Page 5 24 02183 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e SeltlOclt Iandscope to CONi ll 01 tlees sluutlS ground cover ond Or lurl plOnting design to be leyered IOncts ooe Pedestnan SidewOI PecleslliOn idewolk Sheet trees In POrkWOY Ond mediOn 10 COJ S CI1 Of ottert lOllnQ vertcal Irees anct OIIT eOiU TIcanepytrees Poinledmedian n I O I PutlICA lm StooCk PrIvate Reo Exhibit S 3 Silandscape Cross Section I Freedmon Way Pedestrian sidewalk Porkway planling to caNisl 01 r medium Of ICllge conopy reesj Planting on ground mey nclude ground cover ond or turf I Pubic Ream Exhibit S 3 Sjlondscope Cross Section J Orangewood Avenue e 02184 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anahelm Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan SeltlaC lCrOlCape 10 cOlls 1 or llees snrutls 010 10 cover Cl lO crlUll IOr lMO Oe IQn 10 tli leyeled IOndscope Pec lmOr lIlOewOl Slree1 Irees In Porlwovs Cr1 l medlCn 10 conSISt Or onernOllnQ veW OI Tlees ond II 01 medIUm CCnCO f Irees P eshlOl l Il ew k m Ream Stboct eam earn Public Rearn 51 0 Nle 6 Exhibit 5 3 5k landscape Crass Section K Manchester Avenue Westand MidPortions SeltlOCt o to consls1 OII H stlIUCS QIO InCl co onCl OlI pIOnlW1g OUgn 10 De 1Oye d londJcoo SIrMII po twoys 10 conSist 01 veIlCOll J 1 wIn S IIUDI and clingW1g vnes on way wollI Olllf C l Cfj ree shD J L j 1 1 I RIQftIJl way Exhibit 5 3 5 Landscape Cross Section L Manchester Avenue POl tions adjacent to 1 5 Page 5 26 02185 4 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e elboc 10 01 IrIlIlS l IrUel 0 01 100 cO IO lCl Ollul1 Pe clk ConolV ISlCno 00111 PClm In Porlr Ovl 000 mee n Prio oOle eom IS I eom elbOCk PrM lle eom Exhibit 5 3 5mlondscape ClOSS Section M Pocitico Avenue between Harbor BouJevofd and Haster A venue SelbOCk Icncl oCOpe loconsalo11r S sfVuDS Qfoundcov r j anal0 o n a n 10 be a noo j V rtlCOl pam wf lel1I Peoestllon loideWOI vel1iCol palm wrtere poSIOle nplanIng poalOle In plOnling oreas Ofeos legulCly spaced ploollng ollernollf lQ tlele DOrms Oncl conopy If es POn l srlluDS ana QlOl If dcow In meOiCn 1 1 eom Exhibit 5 3 5nlandscape Cross Section N Convention Way e 02186 Poge 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Pion Page 5 28 Section 5 0 Design Plan Se cCl lano Copeloconnrorleel 1 Vll les 9 ounecove onCf011url IPQ k oviOne o elnOlt1Q 101 ve IICOllreel one lITloQ 0 meal ll Tlcanopy reel pLlr hn cr l un l VCCMIS 01 ru r onOIO 9 o n l covel 8 a r s s I I P blC Reorn I Exhibil5 3 5crLandscope Cross Section 0 Anaheim Boulevord Hoster Street I 0 Putllic Aeom J Setback 0 Exhibit S 3 S andscape ClOSS Section P West Place 02187 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e e Pli oCle Tree wellS on V monl Avenue on Y Exhibit 5 3 Sqlandscape Crass Section Q local Streets Arlo Way Coso Vista Ox Road Vermont A venue and Zeyn Street 02188 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 4 Identity Concept Pion This section of the Design Plan proVIdes a summary of the Anaheim Resort Identity Program lunder separate cover which describes how signs and other identity elements such as entry gateways and street furniture in the Public Realm and freestanding monument signs identifying pri vate businesses in the Setback Realm will help create the unified enVIronment envisioned for the entire Anaheim Re sort This Section describes the basic concepts for sign and identity elements and contains speclfic design crlterta for these elements It also shows where the Identity elements will be located Within the Speclfic Plan area The Anaheim Resort Program will be considered by the City Council as a separate document It Is the intent that all Public Realm Identity elements as well as the free standing monument sign design in the Program will be ap plicable to the entire Anaheim Resort Additional important information about signs Is also con tained elsewhere In the Anaheim Resort Speclfic Plan Sec tion 5 5 2 The ArrIval Gateways contains design crtterla for each ofthe major gatewaylocations that supplement the more conceptual contained in this Section Sec tion 5 6 Design Crtterta for the Setback Realm contains a subsection Section 5 6 2 Sign Guidelines and Standards which the design crtterta for signs which identify particular uses Section 5 7 Design Crtterta for the Prtvate Realm also contains asubsection Sectlon 5 7 9 Signs which proVIdes sign guidelines Code Sectlon 18 48 130 of Section 7 0 Zoning and Development Standards contaJns the Anaheim Municipal Code regula tions which will apply to signs in the Speclfic Plan area 5 4 1 Identity and Sign Concepts The folloWIng Bve concepts are the guiding prinCiples which apply to the development of sign and Identity elements Within the Anaheim Resort Page 5 30 5 4 1 1 Reinforcethe Landscape Character of the Anaheim Resort In order to unJty the area sign and Identity elements will reinforce the landscape character in Section 5 3 and elsewhere in the Speclfic Plan This will be achieved In several ways All sign and Identity elements will 02189 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e m m Trellis Design Vocobulary h lW bet e l Be consistent With the geometry by the land scape planting particularly the regularly spaced street trees Convey a warmth and friendliness that will make visi tors feel welcome Emulate traditional garden elements such as trell1ses pergolas garden benches and other typical garden archi tectural elements and Have an open traditional metal trellis work design vo cabulary when appropriate Lattice grids may be open or closed square or diamond mesh simple or elaborate reg ular or irregular Typically trellis design vocabulary will include uprights and capping elements in addition to the grids 5 4 1 2 Forms to be Traditionalln Appearance The basic forms of sign and identity elements will be more tradItional and classical in principle and appearance The following principles will help achieve this Symmetry will be employed in both the desIgn ofindlvid ual elements and in their placement in the landscape Classic garden fumJshings will provide prototypical forms for sign and streetscape elements and Specially designed street fumJture such as benches bus shelters and trash receptacles will create a richer more interesting and inviting pedestrIan enVirorunent 5 4 1 3 Integrated Sign Program Directs Visitors Efficiently In order to better orient vls1lors an integrated program which includes Informational regulatory and directional signs will be established The overall intent of this system is to Inform rather than advertise ThIs system will have the folloWing characteristics Prior to inStallation plans will be prepared which show the location sign type and message or messages in the case of achangeable message sIgn that will be used for each sIgn in the Plan area Signs in the Public Realm the ulllmate public right of way and thefreestanding monument signs in the Setback Re Jw bedesigned as a famUy of Signs with a consis tent design vocabulary and Consistent regulations for signs on private property will make 1l easier for visitors to qUIckly find their destinallon 02190 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Page 5 32 Section 5 0 Design Plall 5 4 4 Consistent Color System A consistent color system for all sign and identity ele ments in the Public Realm and freestanding monument hal ef signs in the Setback Realm established to further enhance the area s Visual appearance and proVide a dis tinct Identity The dominant hues of the coior system w complement the landscape and will incorporate the colors found in traditional garden fumlshings The color system hA iH ha e the following The color Palette limited a few major colors w1ll dominate sign and Identity elements and any minor col orsused w1I1 be limited to accents and other inor usage and The color palette w1ll be applied to all elements in the public of way and to freestanding monument signs in the Setback Realm 5 4 1 5 Night Lighting to Create 0 Festive Atmosphere Night lighting w1ll be another component of the Identity concept Lighting Visible from public streets w1ll be espe cially important in helping to create the festive garden like atmosphere of the Specific Plan area Accordingly the following night lighting concepts w1ll be applied within the Specific Plan area Identityw1ll be created by night lighting using wann and cool light effects and Special identity elements in the public right of way such as gateways can feature special night ligh g ef fects not permitted elsewhere 5 4 2 Identity Elements This section contains the design principles that dellne the character ofthe key Identity elements in the area These el ements are contained w1thln the public right of way and in clude Gateways Light fixtures and pageantry elements such as flags and banners and Street such as benches bus shelters and trash receptacles 5 4 2 1 Got woys Gateways w1ll dellne the entries into the Anaheim Resort They w1ll help the area as dUferent 02191 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e l The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design plan AJ FI s Arterial Rood Gateway from surrounding areas and will Inform arriving Visitors that they are entertng a special place With a resort recre ation character Since many Visitors will arrive in the area by vehicle the Plan defines two dlfferent types of gateways that will be oriented primarily to vehicles Freeway Gateways and Arterial Road Gateways The folloWing Is ageneral description ofeach ofthese ma Jor gateways which are on ExhIbit 5 4 2 la Gateway Location Plan and the guiding design pies for each type Section 5 5 2 Arrival Gateways sup plements the general concepts described here With more detalled guidelines for each indIVidual gateway Freeway Gateways The Plan Identifies three freeway gateways along Inter state 5 as shown on Exhibit 5 4 2 la Gateway Location Plan Theywill be the first experience of the Anaheim Re sort for nearly 70 ofarriving Visitors and Will be oriented primarily to vehicles The character of the freeway gate ways Will be created primarily by landscaping which may consist of large scale plantings of trees and directional signs Other optional features which may be incorporated into these gateways include Night I1ghting which hlghI1ghts the arrival experience Architectural elements consistent with the other gar den l1ke elements to be used in the area and Ident11lcation signs to supplement the directional signs Artertal Road Gateways ArteI1al gateways occur on Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue near the edges ofthe Central Core area TheyWill be oriented primarily to vehicles and will include the fol lowing primary elements Trellls l1ke architectural elements located in the median and or parkways depending on local conditions see Sec tion 5 5 2 An1val Gateways for more Information Trellis elements will have the same appearance at each location though their arrangement may vary Trell1s elements will be placed on abase which reinforc es the elements traclJtional character 02192 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan x J c I L H I II Wft ij x if ii J4 i1 jl fC i Ji 11 nt t fn JtJ J fi f I luel l I I J l II Ii IoJ 11 1 i llj i 1i B T f l 1 I i r i f 7 I L i iL 1 i ti i I I I Z o I 4 I i 1 IJ JSi The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim Callfomia legend J limit 01 Anaheim Resort limit of Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Area Gateway Location Plan o lOCO 2lXXl tee EBN Designated rar Future Extension in General Plan Circulation Element Designated Future AUgnment In General Plan Circulation Element Freeway Gateways Ibid i Cerritos Avenue win be elocated 1 COJ to L 1 00 leet northerly a portion 01 West Street wiU become 0 cul de sac West Place Arterial Raad Gateways Exhibit 5 4 2 1o Gotewoy Location Plan Page 5 34 02193 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design P an e e Special Ligfll Fixture wtth Banner i Bus Sneller with bench ee l e Landscape on the ground will feature color and may consist oflarge uniform shrub masses seasonal color or other similar landscape plantings The gateways will allow for the attachment of flags and banners the deployment ofthese elements may be related to seasonal or event driven needs A logo the Nlahelm Resort will also be in cluded In the gateway and Night lighting will be used the gateway after sunset 5 4 2 2 Lighting Fixtures and Street Pageantry A new City of Nlahelm Design Street light standard shall be approved by the Public Utilities Department for instal lation In the Nlahelm Resort The new street light stan dard will be unique to the Nlahelm Resort and will utilize the standard cobrahead lumlnalre This street light will consist of atapered fluted pole on a special base and a decorative scroll and flnjal The light standards will pro vide an armature for pageantry which may Include flags banners or other similar temporary and permanent but changeable elements The Intent Is to allow regular changes to the pageantry elements In terms of color de sign and other visual content so that the pageantry can always look current 5 4 2 3 Street FumRure Design and placement of street fum1ture within the Nla helm Resort will consist of bus shelters benches and trash receptacles Bus shelters and trash receptacles are acustom design A bench design has been selected from a standard street furniture catalogue but It will be cus tomized for use In the area All street furniture elements will be compatible with and will enhance the landscaped garden theme The custom features will Include Speclal colors consistent WIth the color palette used on r signs gateway elements and other Identity elements Materials added to the furniture to reinforce the trellis like architectural character of other Identity elements and Addition of logos signs or other information al displays 02194 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 4 3 Sign Elements Signs will also conllibute to the unified appearance of the Anahelm Resort Signs In the public right of way will have a consistent theme that Includes support structures type face and color palette Sign elements may be externally or internally illuminated The placement of signs and their in dividual messages will be established prior to sign con struction and Installation The major sign elements In the public right of way Include Vehicular directional signs Regulatory signs Street Identlfication signs Pedestrian directional signs The major sign element In the Setback Realm Is the free standing monument sign for Identillcation of private busi nesses Since these signs are designed to reinforce the identity of the Resort asimilar trellis vocabulary Is used Standards and guidelines for these private signs are dis cussed In Sections 5 6 Deslgn Criteria for the Setback Realm and 5 7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm 7 5 4 3 1 Vehicular Dlrecllanol Signs Vehicular Directional Signs Include the following basic types Primary signs which extend over but do not span the roadway and Secondary signs which are located In either the parkway or median L 41 lbu lLH iR lee hit enJs m f 1 lIIh p The communication of information In thJs sign system Is a hierarchical task The hierarchy Is based on communi cating the I1ght information In the I1ght place at the right time In an effort to achieve thJs goal three zones of Infor matton werecreated As Visitors to the area arrive and navigate through the area over one or more days the Informatton zones will be apparent In asubconsciousness way Visitors will look for certain information In speclfic areas For this system to work It will be Important to reduce visual sign clutter All necessary lnformaUon will be consolidated on as few signs as possible and unnecessary signs will be deleted A sign Page 5 36 02195 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e Prlmory VehiCulor Dir c ionOI Signs Secondory Vehlculor DIrectional DepoI nt of T mlpO n htn e 1 r 11 I 11 i ul n Section 5 0 Design Plan hierarchy can only be effective if the number of signs are mln1mlzed and the Informatlon on the signs Is communi cated clearly and IRP ASaRtil aRa re S Primary Vehicular Directional Signs Pr1mary vehicular directional signs Include signs which extend over but do not span the roadway With vehicles traveling on the Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue ar terials at speeds of 45 mph or more It Is Important that this Information can be read from adistance In away sim Ilar to freeway signs These signs will be Umlted In quan tity These signs will be constructed using the same design vocabulary as the Gateways Some of these signs may have achangeable message which features electron Ically controlled display areas which allow custom mes sages to be displayed The messages may vary during the day and will prOvide Important Information to arriving or departing visitors about the locatlon of attractions park Ing or tralllc conditions The final location of these signs will be Identlfied prior to construction Secondary Vehicular Inlormallon Signs Secondary vehicular information Signs are located In ei ther the median or parkway Most of these signs are non changeable however some of the static signs wIIli1kely includesichangeable portlons which can direct traffic or provtdCil1nformation about current events These vehicu lar information signs have been designed to be compatible with other Signs and Identity elements In terms of charac ter color and typeface S 5 13 2 SUIA Hllet d I t 4I IjfU T f1 Uthll 1 81 v II IDI 1 I lIe UIA IOr st Tlftiary 51 os will appear onthe parkway only sY tf H w A S to i J id e mounte on Sign poles wh cll L 1 An elM fif J l i 1I IlJ the 99hn BRa des1gn character of T t8 81 ft JQL nW lul lid he ial L t MS l tu If I lnr tli Alt lS l tco An appropriate metal cap w1lJ bc placed at the top of the pole Tha gp Page 5 37 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan I 1ne h l8@ staneiarel IgpaitiV a nt f T p OlrtaYe glolv SigHS 11 a l y guJ Street identification signs will be located on traffic light poles at major intersections and at secondary intersections on street light poles g@ g rl gl llB te g J JIUR QS etsp uigRu 11 a I tRf 6Lvludu t lw fl t The placement of regula torysigns shall be determined prior to construction and will be coordinated with the placement of directional and information signs as well as other identity elements 3 5 4 3 2 Pedestrian Directional and Informational Signs Pedestrian directional and information signs will be locat ed at three major intersections Katella Avenue and West Street Disneyland Drive Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard and Freedman Way These signs include maps Imbedded in the sidewalk on each of the corners Their purpose is to orient pedestrians and provide direction information to destinations j 5 4 3 1 Private Signs Freestanding Monument Signs The plan provides for monument signs to be located within the Setback Realm These signs are intend ed to Identify particular uses or properties The Design Plan in conjunction with Section 7 0 Zonlng and Devel opment Standards contains design criteria which regu late the location size appearance and message of these signs The basic prinCiples which gulded the formulation of these guldellnes which are explained In more detaJlln Section 5 6 2 Sign Guldellnes and Stan dards and Section 18 48 130 064 of the Specl1lc Plan in clude the follOwing d i d tit f i OI mOllOl O gmolOl 1I OI ClOIllOC O 1Il yOU Il IOI00n irnll OIIl 01 key Inr 1ON OIt oY IypO oI s c OIl rNedestrian Direc liona and Informational f7Signs I a I Freestanding Monument SIgn Page 5 38 Except as spec11lcally permitted In thls Section and In Section 7 0 ZOnlng and Development Standards all free standing Signs shall be monument signs The maximum area of amonument sign Identifying a particular property will be determined by the amount of frontage that particular property has on the adjacent pub lie street Monument signs will have a consistent relationship to the adjacent street IncludJng a m1nlmum setback and a perpendicular orientation to the ultimate public of way 02197 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e Monument signs will have a consistent design whIch Identifies the use as being part of the Anaheim Resort and The message on the sign will be limited to essential in formation about the use on the property Its name Iden tifying logo address and In the case of hotels the availability of rooms for rent and professional Ultimate public right ol way v C j r Ii L Ui t1f lp IJ 1 fl t 4 i Ch N f i I C oo adjacent to Katella Avenue between Hoster Street and Walnut Street and Harbor Boulevard between Interstate 5 and Orangewood Avenue 0 feet elsewhere 7 feet minimum Harbor Boulevard depicted In graphic alSo see Section 5 6 2 lor monumenl sign criteria Exhibit 5 4 3 ree SIgn Design CrHerlo e l t 02198 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 5 Design Criteria for the Public Realm PubIC R 5etDock halm rivate lleCllm R9nlo woy 18UllftO POOIOl l Page 5 40 As described in Section 5 2 7 the Design Plan divides the Specific Plan area into three segments the Public Realm the Setback Realm and the Private Realm The most visible segment known as the Public Realm includes all the area wtthin the ultimate public right of way wtthin the Specific Plan area and includes public streets street medians park ways and sidewalks Because of its visual prominence and because development of this segment will prlmarlly be im plemented by the City or other government agencies Ie Caltrans for 1 5 wtdenirlgJ the Plan proposes more specific design solutions for the Public Realm than for the other Realms These design solutions are described in this Sec tion of the Specific Plan The primary design emphasis in the Public Realm Is to pro vide a streetscape design that Implements the major design concepts described in the preceding sections Adherence to the streetscape design concepts proposed for the Public Realm Is extremely Important because of the dpminant role astreets Image has in creating the Anaheim Resort s iden tity Creating a strong identity 15 critically dependent on 1m plementing a consistent hJgh qUalJty streetscape treatment Virtually all who pass through the area will be affected by the qualJty of the street environment The Public Realm includes public streets wholly the Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan area or public streets on the border ofthe Specific Plan area To the description the Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan describes all public streets contained wholly orpartially within the Plan area The Dtsneyland Resort Speciflc Plan also Identifies the ultimate ot way Its boundaries as the Public Realm The design concepts of streets the Disney land and Anaheim Resort Specific Plans have been designed to be compatible so that the Anaheim Resort as awhole will have aconsistent design and identity Anaheim Resort pub lic streets are entirely outside the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area are not in this document in terstate 5 is located outside theAnaheim Resort has been included the Public Realm because oUts Impor tance to the s experience 5 5a The Public Realm shows the extent of the Public Realm throughout the Anaheim Resort 02199 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The AnOhelm Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Interstale 5 and me Ma Or Intercnanges Though not designed the conceptual landscape plan pro poses that each Interchange be treated as alarge scale gar den easily perceived from vehicles traveUng at freeway speeds To differentiate the Interchanges from one another each Is proposed to feature a distinct landscape type found In Southern CalJfom1a Currently the design plan proposes that the West Street Disneyland Drtve Interchange be a temperate garden featur1ng vertical evergreen trees the Harbor Boulevard Ball Road Interchange a temperate subtropical garden featunng large fiowenng canopy ver tical trees consistent wlth the proposed Public Realm land scape on Harbor Boulevard and the Katella Avenue Freedman Way Interchange an temperate tropical garden e I W l Slr Dflve Inlen hanve a e The discussion of the elements of the Public Realm Is divid ed Into the follOwing parts Interstate 5 and the Major Interchanges The Arrival Gateways and The Public Streets Including West Street DIsneyland Drive Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue Freedman Way Clementine Street Manchester Avenue Walnut Street Ball Road Anaheim Boulevard Haster Street Pacifico Avenue West Street West Place Orangewood Avenue Convention Way and typIcal local streets Including Casa Vista Ver mont Avenue Ox Road Mountain View and Zeyn Each element contains a small reference plan located In the margin that shows the approximate location of the element In a darker shade than other elements depicted In the dia gram There Is also abrtef descliption ofthe landscape con cept a cross section reference key and a cross section illustrating the concept 5 5 1 Interstate 5 and the Major Interchanges Because most of the visitors to the Anaheim Resort will be via Interstate 5 It has an Important role In creating and enhancing the overall Anaheim Resort Identity There may be opportuntty to the Interstate 5 wallsadjacent to the Anaheim Resort for art work to provide additional Identity to the area In addition the design of the Interstate 5 Interchanges wlth West Street Disneyland Olive Harbor Boulevard Ball Road and Katella Avenue Freedman Way will reinforce and complement the overall design objectives of the Plan 02200 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plall o ooa I r c t II c J t II II f llt li 5 1 i w i i Iy a c w i It r 1IIl r i J II Ii I 1 t The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim Callfomla Legend L 1 01 Anonem Resort The Public Realm EBNOrth Anaheim Resort Plan Boundary O 2lXXl 1 The PubDc Ream 1IXXI IbId cerrltos Avenue wtI be relOCated 1 CXlO to 1 100 leel nOflnelty 0portIOn 01 West SI eel wid become 0 cuId sac West Place Destgnated rOI Future Extension In General PIOn Circulation Element Designated Future Alignment In General PIOn Circulation Element Not Pubic Ream dImef lIiOnSnot to ICa txl1ibll S SoTI1e Public Realm Page 5 42 1 e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e Welt Str IIDl1nep nd DnolnIercnonoe lolartrotloulevcm lllal loadIr t cnange 10 Avnue eftong The Freeway Arrlvolgateways e featuring vertical trees Plants will be selected for their drought tolerance to the extent feasible as well as their ability to create avisual impact whJJe st1ll complying with State of California requiremenis for treating water runoIT Though many design solutions might be possible In each of these Interchanges the design should be based on the fun damental prinCiples of creating hortzontal and vertical lay ers and the regular repetition of landscape elements that are among the basic landscape design concepts for the area 5 5 2 Arrival Gateways As described In Section 5 4 there will be several types of ar rIval gateways to the Specific Plan area This section de scribes the treatment of these gateways The three primary Freeway arrival gateways are located at the Interstate 5 Ka tella Avenue Freedman Way Harbor Boulevard Ball Road and West Street Disneyland Drive Interchanges since the majority ofvehJcles to the Anaheim Resort will use these in terchanges The design concept for these gateways will be to extend the landscape treatment of the adjacent Freeway In terchange Into the Anaheim Resort unt1l a smooth transi tion can be made to the landscape treatment of the public streets Entry gateway elements will be located at each ma Jor arrival gateway These entry gateways will be placed In the large landscape areas indicated on the Gateway Loca tion Plan Exhibit 5 4 2 laJ Their desIgn will reinforce the overall Identity ofthe Anaheim Resort according to the Iden tity Concept Plan described In Section 5 4 Arterial Road gateways will be located as shown on the Gateway Location Plan Exhibit 5 4 2 la The design of the entry gateways at these Intersections will be consIstent with the recommenda tions of the Anaheim Resort Identity Program described In Section 5 4 2 5 5 2 1 Harbor Boulevard North Gateway The Harbor Boulevard North gateway Is located at the northern entry Into the Central Core area It will be locat ed immedIately south of the Intersection of Harbor Boule vard and Manchester Avenue Because of the In the parkways on the east side of Harbor Boulevard the garden trellis elements will be limited solely to the medians Other criteria described In Section 5 4 2 I Gateways will be Incorporated Into the design of this gateway 02202 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Page 5 44 Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 5 2 2 Harbor Boulevard Sou1h Gateway The Harbor Boulevard South gateway Is located at the southern entry into the Central Core area It will be locat ed immediately north of the intersection of Harbor Boule vard and Orangewood Avenue To match the Harbor Boulevard North gateway the garden trellis architectural elements will be limited solely to the medians Other cri teria described in Section 5 4 2 1 Gateways will be in corporated into the design of this gateway 5 5 2 3 Katella Avenue East Gateway Je r The Katella Avenue East gateway will be located we of the intersection of Katella Avenue and Haster Stree he gateway elements including the garden trellis architec tural elements will be placed in both the median and 8 foot parkway on either side of the street No elements will span the street The gateway area will begin several hun dred feet west from the Intersection with Haster Street west of the left turn lane median Other criteria described In Section 5 4 2 1 Gateways will be Incorporated Into the design of thJs gateway 5 5 2 4 Katella Avenue Wes Gateway The KateUa Avenue West gateway will be located east of the Intersection ofKateUa Avenue and Walnut Street The gateway elements including the garden trellis architec tural elements will be placed In both the median and 8 foot parkway on either side of the street No elements will span the street The gateway area will begtn Immediately east of the Intersection unless there Is a left turn lane for west bound traffic In which case the gateway area will be Ing Immediately east of the left turn lane median Other crlterta described In Section 5 4 2 1 Gateways will be Incorporated Into the design of this gateway 02203 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan L J Typical ClOSS SCIiOft LocatiOn Typical O fecr On of VIew e ee 5 5 3 The Public Streets Public streets are the backbone of the Public Realm Conse quently It Is important that the public streets confonn to the design concepts in this section 5 5 3 1 Herbor Boulevard Harbor Boulevard is the main north south street with in the Anaheim Resort Between Manchester Avenue and Orangewood Avenue the landscape treatment Is intended to unify the two sides of the street by aland scape treatment that Is consistent on both sides of the street The proposed treatment consists of regularly spaced medium or large spreading canopy trees and ver tical trees The canopy trees will provide shade for pedes trians that walk to the theme parks Anaheim Convention Center or other Anaheim Resort uses from the hotels on Harbor Boulevard and the vertical trees are intended to provide a skyline Identity for the street The median will be planted with the same canopy trees that will be planted in the landscaped parkways The intent Is that the trees eventually close over the street to create agreen canopy Pedestrians will be separated from vehicular traffic by a landscaped parkway Within the median shrubs will be planted to form a barrier to prevent pedestrian crossings at mid block ThIs barrier should be easily seen to be im penetrable to pedestrians Exhibit 5 5 3 la Harbor Bou levard in the Public Realm Between Manchester Avenue and Orangewood Avenue shows the typical treatment on Harbor Boulevard Venlcalll wiln Me ptol l d 01 DeM nirty j IwO 37 01 1cenl rypicol j conoOY u po ona V 1wo r J2 on c nl typIcOl ftdur n PlOntng on Douna to portway ano medlen C 01 Dan typiCal sM ltISground CoYel ondlOflurl Iloom Exhibit 5 5 3 I oHarbor Boulevard in the Public Realm Between Manchester Avenue and Orangewood Avenue 02204 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan L ITypICal CIOSJ S tlOn locotlon Typical OitecliOtl 01 View L I1 5IIc lOC 1 l1PCGfOnc l V Page 5 46 Section 5 0 Design Plan North of Interstate 5 the landscape treatment will contin ue the Harbor Boulevard skyline identity with thevertical tree alternating with amedium or large canopy tree In thIs area of Harbor Boulevard there Is not adequate of way to place a landscape parkway therefore the street trees will be placed in sidewalk cutouts Section 5 8 1 Full Street Reference Plan and Cross Section and Section 5 8 2 Half Street Reference Plan and Cross Sections pro vided specific detaJIs for Harbor Boulevard between Manchester Avenue and Interstate 5 oeWQlk AlIefnalng veniCOIlffle OnG jm o 0 conoov be plOnled 11 I ml limum 4 5 culOulS wiln lOw sruuos tlelOw Exhibi S S J 1 Harbor Boulevord in the Public Realm Nor h of In ers a eS 5 5 3 2 Kefelle Ayenue Katella Avenue Is the main east west street wilh1n the Anaheim Resort In the of cWrerentlating the major streets from each other the landscape on Katella Avenue will feature formal colonnades of regularly spaced Date Palms The Intent Is to Create adramatic impression with the multiple rows of closely spaced palms Maximize the effectiveness of the area available for land scape by using the multiple layers to create an Increased sense of depth of the landscape along the street and Use the palm s ultimate height to help create afeeling of enclosure thereby reducing the apparent scale of the street Pedestrtan walks on both sides of the street will be sepa rated from the vehicular tramc by alandscaped parkway 02205 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resar Plan e e Wed I IID1tMytand DtI L I rypeOlCfous ctlonloeOliO l A ryp cOlOlt ttonol e Section 5 0 Design Plan The broad canopy of the palm wt1l provide shade on the walks and the narrow trunk will permtt views Into adJOin Ing properties o O 0 00 Polms 1wenry IOl IrleeT 24 oncel llel pec iol Q rhdure Wlrnocnneri on pcr wovond medlCn vplCal Doutlle lOW or DOle l Potms Twenty tour reel lA loneenlel Ground cover mov nCluele lur Qround covel pl ll lieRe lm Exhibit S S J 2oKafella A venue in the Public Realm 5 5 3 3 West Slreel Dlsneyland Drive West Street Disneyland Drtve has two typical conditions North ofBall Road tt Is thenorthern arrtval street Into the Anaheim Resort The landscape trealment wt1l be an ex tension of the landscape treatment of the 1 5 West Street Disneyland Drtve Interchange which Is currently proposed to feature evergreen vertical trees and other temperate zone plants Tall vertical canopy trees will be placed In existing sidewalks to help screen existing resl dential uses to the west 5 r I Oncl median 10 r C O C C O OIU l 8eom xhibit S S J JoWest Street Disneyland Drive in the PubliC Realm North at Boll Rood 02206 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan L J 1y col C OU S1Ion Local ioll 1yph CJlO ltw Ir 01CCIfem s rPlCO Page 5 48 Section 5 0 Design Plan South of Ball Road the proposed landscape for the Public Realm IS Intended to help tie together the different uses on either sIde of the street with aplanting ofmedIum or small canopy trees and vertical trees from Katella Avenue to the north end of the public parking facility planned for The Disneyland Resort West Parking Area Pedestrian walks on both sides of the street will be separated from vehicular traffic by alandscaped parkway along the entire length of the street ExhIbIt 5 5 3 3 West Street Disneyland Drive In the Public Realm Between Cerritos Avenue and KateUa Avenue shows the treatment In the Public Realm on West Street Disneyland Drive south of Ball Road PedeSlllOn sidewalk j po an m 10 COI WS ot QllelnalinQ verllCOIl ftS and m lUm Of smal canopy I S PlonI9on g10und moy IncluCleJlV lOl OfOl nd coYerOl Id Ol Iud Exhibit S S 3 Disneyland DriveIn the Public Realm Between Cerritos Avenue and Kat9Ua Avenue 5 5 3 4 West 51r south of Kofello Avenue Magnolia trees In a landscaped parkway Is the dominant character of the existing streelscape onWest Street south of Katella Avenue In order to maintain the residential quality of this street Magnolla trees within an 8 foot turf parkway and 4 foot sidewalk are proposed for this section of West Street between KateUa Avenue and Convention Way 02207 1 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Pedeslrion side alk e e J yplCaI CIOU SKIIon ocanon A TypICal Dt ec lcln or v e Section 5 0 Design Plan PubiC AeOlm Exhibit S S J 4oWest Street in the Public Reaim South ot Katelia Avenue 5 5 3 5 Freedman Way Freedman Way will be widened to automobUes effi cientlyInto the planned public parking facility in The Dis neyland Resort East Parking Area The landscape treatment the Public Realm will feature regularly spaced alternating small or medIum canopy trees and vertical trees such as those shown In the accompanying cross sections An eIght foot landscaped parkway will separate pedestrians from vehicular tratllc f Peots1llon K1 oIt Exhibit S S J So Freedman Way East at Clementine Street In the Public Realm 02208 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anehelm Resert Specific Plen location Typical atec lOl l of V w Page 5 50 Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 5 3 6 Clementine Street Like Freedman Way Clementine Street Is an important vehicular access road to the planned public parking facil Ity In The Disneyland Resort East Parking Area The pro posed landscape for the public right of way of this street is simllar to the treatment of Freedman Way and Is illus trated In the next two cross sections Pedestrian walks w1ll be separated from vehicular traffic by a landscaped parkway In the future apedestrian way people mover mOVIng sidewalk system may be located In the median to connect The Disneyland Resort East Parking Area to the Future Expansion District located south of Katella Ave nue as shown below In interim conditiOn median 19 to CONISl 01 mQM canopyII S VIl Ies glound cover oncl or lu l Exhibit S S 3 6O Clementine Street in the Public Reaim Condi tion Without 0Pedestrian Way People Mover Moving Sidewalk System in Median J m y on grOl rdmay planMg 10 roIICI conlillol C Ol IO or1Uf canopy I orCU ClC and ort l1 I Exhibit S S 3 6b Clementlne Street In the Public Realm Condition with 0PatenNal Pedestrian Way People Mover Moving Sidewalk System In Median North 01katello A venue 02209 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e L J ClewsectiOn Loconon Dection 01 View Typical Crcw 5K1Ion LocOlOll e ee e 5 5 3 7 Manchester Avenue Like Freedman Way and Clementine Street Manchester Avenue is an important vehicular access road to the Ana heim Resort The proposed landscape for the public right of way of the west portion is similar with regularly spaced alternatmg small or medium canopy and vertical trees In an 8 foot landscape parkway and In a landscaped median The west and mid portions of Manchester are 11 lustrated In the next exhibit SUe llrees in parkways end medlOn 10 consiSt 01otlernorll1g verhCOI llees ol d smo Of meehum canopy lIees PedeSlnonslOewolk J j j I Exhibit 5 5 3 7o Monch ter Avenue West ond North Portions shoo med Adjacent to Interstate 5 the proposed landscape of Manchester Avenue continues the regularly spaced alter natingsmall or medlum canopy and vertical trees In an 8 foot landscape parkway Adjacent to Interstate 5 there Is no pedestrian walkway and the parkway is reduced to 5 feet In width 02210 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan aI I CI CIQII SKIlon toeOllOn tn cd 0IIK1IOI l atVIew Page 5 52 Section 5 0 Design Plan v tlees in Porkwoysro CONiSl 01 Yerl J I J 00 000 u rubS SI08WOik WIn i Vi 1 04 fn j 1 0 ones DE Ie e CMOflI Snow pOl Pvl lliC Reom Exhibit S S 3 7b Mancheslef Avenue Pot ions Adjacent 10 in lefSlaleS 5 5 3 8 Walnut Street Walnut Street forms the western edge of the Specific Plan area The proposed landscape within the public of way medium canopy trees planted In a con tinuous parkway on the east side of the street and In a new median which w1ll be Installed between Ball Road and Katella Avenue Trees of a similar sIZe and type w1ll be Installed on the west side of the street A continuous pedestrtan walk on the east side of the street w1ll be sep arated from vehicular tra1l1c by a landscaped parkway 02211 e e ee ---PAGE BREAK--- I The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design plan e e a I 1VPCo1CIOM s e lOCGaotl In col ChC1lOn of Ie e ee T end median10 be legUlarlY OCICeCl medIUm canopy nees landsCape on IWrOYnd may COOi or l In lt grounl cover and or 11 I1 and may be ben ned PutlliCReolrn Exhibil5 5 3 80Walnut Street in the Public Realm 5 5 3 9 Ball Road Ball Road Is another major east west street within the Specific Plan area The proposed landscape treatment for the public right of way will Include aplanting of medium or large canopy trees In new tree wells to be cut Into the concrete sidewalk east of Interstate 5 The large canopy trees will be placed In parkways west of Interstate 5 Trees ofthe same species will be planted In the raised medians as will complementary ground cover J MedIUm or IolgeCOnopyll SIO pICInled irlloncuc oped paltway well or 01nil weaseOSl 01 5 fuv tf Jfi r r i 11 POInTed median Pub horn Exhibit 5 5 3 9080 1 Road East 01 West Place in the Public Realm with Painted MedIan 02212 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan a T tQ COI c o 5ec lOn tocorlOn Nee Ion of V w J Typical CI OU sec oOtl LocoJon Page 5 54 Section 5 0 Design Plan n Medil lm orlQQe canopy Ireeslo be plOnlecl tn lQnc lCoped POlkway onc eXllIng medians Publi Reolm Exhibit 5 5 3 91Ball Rood West Place to Walnut Street in the Public Realm with Landscaped Median 5 5 3 10 Anaheim Boulevardl Haster Street The Anaheim Boulevard Haster Street landscape w1ll consIst of alternating regularly spaced small or medium canopy trees and vertical trees Pedestrian sidewalks w1ll be separated from vehJcular traffic by alandscaped park way 1 0 0 onernomg 101 n1Coll 1ono 01 01 meolum COI lOPV Irees PIOnIIng on grOl lnCI moy COI lIlII 01 lu oncl Ol g ound co r e e Exhibit 5 5 3 lOaAnaheim Boulevard Hoster Street in the Public Realm 02213 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan e Clem secllOl l LocOtiO l rYP COI DitKIiot1 01 View L J rPlCOI CIQjJ Secnon lOCOHCn l p1cel OwKhOn 01 v e t Section 5 0 Design Plan 3 11 Canvenllan Way Convention Way has been designed and constructed to create agrand and through the use oflarge stately palm trees alternating with large canopy trees A subtropical plant palette provides abackdrop to the palms Since the public right of way is not changing in this area the palms have been Inserted within the exist Ing sidewalks on both sides of the street which will also maintain their current location and size Where there is an existing raised median palms and barrter shrubs were added In order to create aconsistent streetscape Veneol palm 1 pQDl Ie fl OIIlOS Regl llcr1y spoc eo Planting onelno 9 belw and canopyIr s DOII r Srllutll ond ground eave in m iOn PubIll Aeom EXhibit 5 5 3 Ilo Convention Way in the Public Realm 5 5 3 12 Avenue The Anaheim General Plan designates the westward ex tension ofPacifico Avenue from east ofInterstate 5 to Har bor Boulevard south of Katella Avenue At this time the exact alignment of Pacifico Avenue has not been deter mined However the future Interstate 5 widening plans show Pacifico Avenue to be an HOV HJgh Occupance Ve hicle exit and as such will be an entrance Into the Ana helm Resort Between Interstate 5 and Haster Street reta1n1ng and soundwalls are proposed along both sides of Pacifico Avenue since the road will be elevated The land scape on Pacifico Avenue between Haster Street and Har bor Boulevard Is proposed to feature a fonnal colonnade of regularly spaced palms with asubtropical plant palette 02214 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan to provide a backdrop to the palms The sidewalks will be set behind a parkway of unlform dimension PeoeSlr n S1 lewOlk Canary SlOnCl Dare lo m parkwaY onCl medlons Suoolemenrory meoan uOlIgnl or0004eo evergreen s lIUOI PuDIIC Rea Exhibit 5 5 3 12oPacitico A venue in the Public Realm tMtween Harbor Boulevard and Hoster Street 5 5 3 13 Orangewood Avenue Although Orangewood Avenue ts generally outside the Anaheim Resort the intersection with Harbor Boulevard and the segment of the street adjacent to the Anaheim Re sort has been included in the Plan The bastc concept ts to extend the planting of the street tree MagnoUa grand11lora within the right of way and park way stdewalk PedeShlOl ll6cMwalll 1yptCOICrous b lLoeoffcn 1yp1C01Otecaonolvr w r OC oI J Plonft lo on orcund mayKluae QlCM lCCOWt anclOf Iud I Exhibit 5 5 3 13crOrangewood Avenue in me Public lealm Page 5 56 02215 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan J Typical CrouShOn loco ion TypicoJ Oit lionof VIII 5 5 3 15 Locel Streets Local Streets are those streets lntended primarilyto serve local traffic Local Streets Within the Specific Plan area In elude Arlo Way Casa VIsta Ox Road Vermont Avenue and Zeyn Street The typIcal configuration of an lnterlor street includes one travel lane in each direction with on street parking Public Realm Improvements for Arlo Way Casta VIsta Ox Road West Place and Zeyn Street lnelude a landscaped parkway with street trees and a pedestrian sIdewalk as Illustrated In the folloW1ng cross section Pedestriansidewolk Smell or medium canopy I flree oonled n parkway l ortree wells Planting on ground may include ground cover and or fun y PUbtic Realm Tree wells on Vermonl Avenue Exhibit 5 5 3 l5aTypicol locol Street Arlo Woy Coso Vlsto Street Ox Rood Vermont A venue ond Zeyn Street Public Realm improvements for Vennont Avenue lnelude the same street trees however they are located within tree wells rather than In alandscaped parkways The public Realm landscape for West Place Is also similar however there are additional parkways PoItwoyIondscope 10 cOnu1 ot lees srvutls groutld cover ond OlIf plOnlll lQ 0ftIgl lto De IOyered IOndSCOpe Pedetlllon IdOeWOll t M t p PuDIC R 5 3 l5 Typicollocol Street West Ploce Page 5 57 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5 6 Design Criteria tor the Setback Realm Public holm s 1back unrmalePubtc l liQ ll0r woy BuMdinQ Serboclt Page 5 58 Privet Realm Section 5 0 Design Plan The Setback Realm Includes the required structural set back area between the Public and Private Realms as Identi fied In Section 7 0 ZonJng and Development Standards The primary role of the Setback Realm Is to support the de sign objectives for the entire Specific Plan area by reinforc ing the design of the streets The setback areas vary sIgnificantly In width use and character Consequently the design guIdelines for the Setback Realm vary depending on these factors VIsual consIstency w1lI be achieved by appli cation of the common landscape vocabulary such as the layered landscape concept descrIbed In precedlng sections and the regularIty of the landscape treatment along the ad jacent public streets The exhibit on the following page shows the location of the Setback Realm within the Specific Plan area 5 6 1 Exterior Lighting The following gUIdelines and standards apply to exterior lighting In the Setback Realm or where visible from the pub lic right of way All night lighting shall predominantly consist oflights that have awarm lncandescent appearance cool light sourc es such as mercury vapor lights or other light sourceS which give people and plants astrange appearanCe at night such as low or high pressure sodium lights shall not be visible from major streets Code Section 18 48 050 illuminated areas shall be localized as much as possIble light fixtures which broadcast light OVer large areas or which are asource of glare are not permitted Code Section 18 48 050 I EJ t Q 11 BlOOdcost nOI permmed lOCOl1ed lighting requied Exhibit 5 6 IoLocallze lignting Effects 02217 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Ibid The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 1 I v f J i C ffl ft m JZ hr 4YZ i wd b h n I r w I f I E J I U ffl e i1 f h I It l r G r c t it i o j i J i H t i 1 i 4 j r 1 V I J V M H I II l Ji l i i z n 1 l 2 l ii i 1 t 1 i W I i c J I z Sl f Ir e v M 1 I liI ct v r a i c lC c c r wqQx 4f t I w I c non I J i fr i 1 CI U f C re I Ice n i ltl aronp 71 Ch SE I ne cl lkh bC mNt entrJ YV eMs Af fI7 W The Anaheim Resart Specific Plan Anaheim Callfamia Legend The Setback Realm I L Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundor Designated for Future Extension In General Plan Circulation Element limit of Anonelm Resort EB Norlh m n o 1 2QX feel C2 a Designated Future Alignment In General Plan Circulation Element feerrltos Avenue will be rekcated to 1 100 feet northerly 0portion of West Street will become 0 cul de sac West Place Setback Realm Central Core DeSlgn Standards Setback Realm Peript1ery Design Standards v ExnlOit 5 6oTne SetOack Reatm 02218 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Page 5 60 Exterior building illumination sl 1all be focused at tl 1e pe destrlan level storefronts building en01es porte cocheres and other comparable locations Code Section 18 48 050 Special accent lighting may illuminate unique architec tural details where appropriate but such lighting should be focused and used sparingly night ligl 1ting effects wl 1icl 1 il luminate entire buildings or large portions of buildings w1Jl not be permItted where sucl1 buildings are prominently vls ible from adjacent public streets Code Section 18 48 050 Multi colored ligl 1ts may only be used sparingly the dom Inant ligl1t colors shall be warm incandescent like colors Code Section 18 48 050 Landscape ligl 1ting inCluding tree upligl 1ts small bare bulb incandescent Ughts twinkle lights and other similar Ughting effects are encouraged to add a gUttering or specu lar effect to supplement the indirect nature of the rest of the Plan area s night lighting Except for small bare bulb and tw1nkle lights all land scape lighting fixtures including tree UPUghts shall be con cealed from vlew by burial in the ground or by locating them in landscaped areas Code Section 18 48 050 5 6 2 Freestanding Sign Guidelines and Standards Freestanding monument sIgns wlll be placed in the Setback Realm to provlde aprimary source ofbusiness Identiflcatlon for all categories of commercIal enterprise They wlll be part of the elements for the Anaheim Resort and as such wlll contr1bute to the un1fy1ng effect of the overall sIgn and streetscape program 5 6 2 1 General Sign Slandard Standard sIgn base shall be precast colored concrete as specified In the Anaheim Resort Program Construct street number and main Identity sIgn boxes of fiberglass or aluminum materials All other materials in cluding wood and steel are not allowed The SIgn face shall read as a single surface WIth sIgn copy applied by sUk screenlng or push through acryUc fiush to the surface Code Section 18 48 130 FIberglass sIgns shall be constructed of fiberglass reln orced plastic WIth a smooth surface prIor to painting Col 02219 e eel ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resart Specffic Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e orlng lntegral to the fiberglass materIal Is also acceptable Code Section 1848 130 Alumlnum signs shall be of an approprtate thickness to avoid oil canning or buckling A 1 8 lnch m1n1mum thick ness Is required All seams shall be filled and ground smooth There shall be no visible fasteners and all edges shall be eased Code Section 18 48 130 All surfaces shall be thoroughly prepared and approprt ately prlmed and palnted to lndustry standards to prevent oxidation pItting or rust Code Section 18 48 130 Construct 9 of perm tn r r S 1 M r J ode S idIe 18 130 Identification of sIgn fabricator credits shall be hIdden om public view Code Section 18 48 130 5 6 2 2 Freestanding Monument Sign Requirements l X r r n n I i A r r j J I I l Jj x tIO 11o U StanCfOICf Sign Bose I I lUiif r e SlanC10rd Location for Hotel Motel InfOfmotlon Each site shall have only one prlmary iden tification sign unless otherwise allowed In Code Section 18 48 130 All freestanding signs shall be monument on ground signs except as speclfically provided In the Design Plan and In Section 7 0 Zonlng and Development Standards Pole or pylon signs are prohibited Code Section 1848 130 All signs shall use the standard sign base which has been designed as part of the overall Anaheim Re sort Identity Program unless speclfically exempted by the provisions of Section 7 0 ZOnIng and Development Stan dards Code Section 18 48 130 An Anahelm Resort logo will appear on three sides ofeach column on the standard sign base Locate the street address In the desIgnated area Use the typeface consistent with the identity sIgn elements for the street address Code Section 18 48 130 Use a horlzontal format for all monument signs Hotel motel owners shall place standardized vacancy and affiliation Information In the designated area Code Section 18 48 130 Use only the allowable sign illumlnation Code Section 1848 130 02220 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Page 5 62 Section 5 0 Design Plan Determine sign area by length of street frontage Code Section 18 48 130 Calculate sign area based on rectangu lar shaped sign cabinet Code Section 18 48 130 q I iV Lf lL L H 12 1 U l 1IIn 10 150 r q 1 Jo q remod hAi 5 n 150 100 I It q I I s 300 Exhibil5 2 2e Sign Area Determined by Street Frontage The setback from the ultimate pubUc of way for monument sIgns shall be zero feet ad Jacent to Harbor Boulevard between Orangewood Avenue and Interstate 5 and adjacent to Katella Avenue between Interstate 5 and Walnut Street the mln1mum setback from the ultimate pubUc of way for freestanding monument sIgns from all other adjacent streets shall be seven feet Code Sectlon 18 48 130 In general the number of colors used on asign should be Umlted Use a single Ught tan color Ident1fted In the Ana heim Resort Identity Program document for the sign face background and acontrasting color for the sign copy A company symbol may have a variety of colors Use of fluo rescent colors Is prohibited Code Section 18 48 130 02221 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e PROJECT NAME T t 1 T t 2 Te t I I I 0 I 0 Tenant IdentIfication Criteria e The layout ofsign copy both company name and symbol may vary however sign copy total area shall not exceed 75 of total sign area For the maln body of the sign copy Is prohibited In the ten Inch zone around the perimeter of the sign face This will keep the sign copy from appearing crowded Code Section 18 48 130 I I I 10 10 II II 10 0 10 10 Exhibit 5 6 2 2ILoyout of Sign Copy Sfll h t 16 0 f d8dl8Rt I IR8RSf IItgR aat t l f C I Hnn 1 R 4R m 5 6 2 3 Mu l t nant Signs o Limit the number of tenant names per freestanding mon ument sign A single sign may Incorporate the name and or U logo of the project or development and or name and or logo of up to three business tenants Code Section 18 48 130 10 o To enhance legibility such multi tenant signs shall either use one consistent typeface for all tenants or use one color for all sign copy The capital letter height and logo ofall ten mt Identification copy shall be the same on asingle sign ace Code Section 18 48 1301 02222 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Speetfie Plan Curb Ultimate riQht or woy 1 r i I Clear area of corner I permits befler visibility I I Minimum sign setback 7 I Page 5 64 Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 6 2 4 Land cape Sign Locate monument signs and landscaped wall Identity signs so that vehicular sight dIstances at entry driveways are maintained Code Section 1848 130 A landscap Avall Identity sign shall be In Ueu of a freestanding monument sign on Convention Way Code Section 18 78 130 0 WC t Smd IOiS d J p n J te h e K lOllPottnuc Pll Ro Encourage landscape screening behind the landscaped wall identity sign Dolled line InCiCcles o eo used 10 COleulOfe SQuOle loofoge 01 Ign Exhibit 5 6 2Ao londscoped WolI Sign 5 6 2 5 Aulomotlve Service Slollon Sign Slondords Automol1ve sernces station signs shall be designed as part of a unllled lnformal1onal sign system and shall con form to the provisions of Section 7 0 Zonlng and Develop ment Standards Code Section 18 48 130 Automot1ve sernce station sign copy Is prohibited In the six Inch zone around the perlmeter ofthe sIgn face Code Secl10n 18 48 130 Changeable copy for pricing information located In the area of the sign face closest to the adjacent pubUc street shall be eIther manually or electronically changeable char acters shall not be greater than ten l0 Inches provided 02223 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plpn they are smaller In height than the company name nor less than six 6 Inches In height Code Section 18 48 130 q I r 10 l l II II 0 r I I Exhibit S 6 2 SoGas Station Pricing Information 02224 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Pla n Page 5 66 5 6 3 Setback Realm Guidelines tor the Central Core The prinCipal objective of the design guidelines within the Setback Realm In the Central Core Is to create a consistent hJgh quallty pedestrian environment that reinforces the character established by the landscape and other street el ements contained in the Public Realm Generally these ob Jectives will be achieved by Site planning guidelines such as encouraging ground floor uses 1 e outdoor d1n1ng promote pedestrian activity adjacent to the street see Section 5 6 3 1 guidelines which encourage buUdlng mass Ing that w1l1 define the street edge In a consistent manner see Section 5 6 3 2 Circulation and parking guidelines limit the extent of the area devoted to the automobUe See Section 5 6 3 3 Speciallntersectlon landscape treatment for Intersections In the Central Core as well as other major entrances In the Anaheim Resort See Section 5 6 3 4 Landscape guidelines encourage planting design which Is compatible with the treatment of the adjacent Pub lic Realm See Section 5 6 3 5 LIghting guIdelines limit the variety ofoutdoor light Ing effects See Section 5 6 3 6 and Sign guidelines require consistent size placement and treatment of signs See Section 5 6 2 Exhibit 5 6 3a Is adiagram illustrates the basic Cen tral Core design It Is followed by amore detaUed discussion of each and how they will be applied to the two maJn streets In the Central Core Harbor Boulevard and Ka tella Avenue Ground lloof use to pedestrk lns No palUlgbetween buidlng and ighl ol way Cansislenl sign deSign Cans tenl plant palene and landsCape design treatment PubIC Ream o setback Ream 1 f Exhibit 5 6 3 Bosic Centrol Core Design Principles 02225 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 6 3 1 Central Core Site Planning Guidelines Provide ground floor uses such as restaurants retail stores and other similar types of businesses that attract pedestrtans adjacent to the right of way Provide direct access to uses on the ground floor of buildings from the slreet This Is partlcularly true of ac cessory uses for hotels which may also provide entries and openings from inside the hotel building Place buildings on parcels so that aminimum of 80 of the property frontage Is occupied by building Ifthis Is not possible plant closely spaced vertical trees at the building setback line in order to create a green mass which has the effect of enclosing the street in amannersimilar to the effect of a building mass New buildings added to existing development slles should be located adjacent to the setback line and park Ing concealed from view Provide outdoor and other uses up to 80 with In the Harbor Boulevard Central Core Setback Realm Uke ly to attract pedestrians Prohibit uses intended primar1ly to attract automobiles such as drtve through restaurants Locate parking structures In separate buildings at the rear portion of the site unless more than 75 of the ele vation contains pedestrian ortented uses which have openings to the adjacent Central Core street Centrol Core J Parking Facililyol J Hotel or other permitted C R Area Use Street rear of site Exhibit 5 6 3 1 oPloCe ot the teot of fhe site 5 6 3 2 Archnecturol Guldennes Articulate building masses adjacent to the of way with elements such as recesses In windows and door openings vartations In building height balconJes and buildings with distinct layersabase amiddle and a top 02226 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design PZan Page 5 68 Prohibit large blank undifferentiated building eleva tions and monolithic building masses that would be visi ble from the Public Realm including such building elevations located on the property lines which are promi nent 5 6 3 3 Circulation and Parking Guidelines Eliminate curb cuts and driveways that disrupt the flow ofpedestrians whenever feasible eliminate redundant ac cess driveways to the same parcel or consolidate drtve ways on adjacent parcels Parcel 8 access i drvewoy Q Parcel A PatcelA access driveway ParcelS Right of way Sidewall Central Core Slr t curb 1 cuts disrupt pedestrian trotflc Exhibit S 6 3 3o CUlb cuts Parcel A Porcel A CleC dfiYeway POlcel 8 Parcel 8 acces s driveway Central Core Ir Rec ocQl acce51 nlSmoy be necessary to assure I peml0n8nl access L 1 CONOIdal drivewayssmooth now Exhibit S 6 3 3b ConsoHdote CUlb cuts 02227 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e e The maximum number of curb cuts per lot should ad here to the following standards Parcel Width Number of Curb Cuts 300 feet or less 300 feet 2 Exhibit 5 6 3 3c Maximum Number of Curb Cuts per Lot Prohibit curb cuts separated by less than forty feet The maximum Width of a driveway should not exceed twenty eight 28 feet Entry to hotel parking areas including those located un der buildings and surface parking lots may be directly from the adjacent Central Core street prOVided such entry Is not more than 28 feet Wide and Is less than 20 of the Width of the property Enlry 10 parking areas covers no more 1han 28 feet wide I I Parcel Widlh Exhibit 5 6 3 3dLimH portion of elevation devoted to parking crea entries Parking between the right of way and the building face Is prohibited 5 6 3 4 5peclallnlersecllon Landscape SpeCial Intersection landscape treatment Is required for the following Intersections which are either to the Anaheim Resort or major Intersections Within the Re sort All of these Intersections are Within the Central Core except for the Ball Road Intersections Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard and Manchester Avenue Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue KateUa Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard Haster Street Katella Avenue and West Street Ball Road and West Street DIsneyland Drive and Page 5 69 2228 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Add c d re r Y 5howj Jr1I 1IT Ilt cr jv J i 1teJ a 1fh C w U be pr 47J rytr Page 5 70 Ball Road and West Street to be renamed West Place 10 i o I d men ltr 10 Low shrubs colorful plants 1Za XF OI l 0 ms i it1 X t 3 0 8 J t Katella Avenue Exhibit 5 6 J 4aSpeciallnfersection Landscape Treatment All properties at these comers shall provide afifty oot trt angular intersection area to be landscaped with the same type o parkway trees on the adjacent streets For exam ple the tr1angular landscape area on the Harbor Boule vard Katella Avenue intersection would be landscaped with acombination o Palm trees and canopy trees as well as shrubs and colorful annuals 5 6 3 5 Landscape The landscape character o the Setback Realm In the Central Core should support the garden Image o the Anaheim Resort the landscape o the adjacent Publlc Realm and the layered landscape concept de earlJer In Section 5 3 3 Layered landscape De sign Crtterta Where there Is adequate space and the scale Is approprt ately grand trees should be planted In away that creates large scale horIZontal and vertical layers On Harbor Boulevard the ollowlng addltional guide lines apply Areas that have amore Intimate scale such as those ortented towards pedestrtans outdoor eating areas or example may use smaller scale trees and shrubs wlth 02229 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e e in the Setback Realm Shrubs decorative walls and fences may be used as barners wtthin the Setback Realm to create enclosure for outdoor eating and pedestrian gathering areas pro vided that any barner greater than 42 inches high shall be transparent Paving ofrequired landscape areas will be perm1lted in the Setback Realm provided such paved area will serve pedestr1an related activities outdoor dining access to retall stores and similar uses Paved portions of the Setback Realm specifically in tended for pedestrian use may cover up to 80 of the setback area provided that the paved area Includes cut out areas for trees minimum ofone tree per 200 square feetl planters pots colored or enriched paving and other pedestrian oriented amenJties 5 6 3 6 Exterior Lighting Decorative lighting wtth a festive Tlvoli Garden charac ter Is permitted wtthin the Setback Realm It may Include tree uplights tree small lights In trees or on shrubs outdoor str1ng lights that outline building mass es and similar lighting effects Visible light bulbs shall be Incandescent or shall have a warm lighting characteristic similar to Incandescent fix tures Exterior lights may be Incandescent or metal halide flu orescent low pressure sodium high pressure sodium and mercury vapor are prohib1led In the Setback Realm Lighting that illuminates building walls Is not permitted 5 6 4 Setback Realm Guidelines for Areas Outside the Central Core In the areas of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan outsidethe Central Core the Intent of the Design Plan Is to perm1l flex Ibillty In site architectural design location of parking areas and landscape design 5 6 4 1 S e Planning wl lwll S mnd IJds The of the minimum building setback wt1l vary de pending on the General Plan designation of the adJacenl street as foUowC Ccit sec n4l 16 18 010 Adjacent to Major Primary and Secondary Arterl al Roads the minimum setback for buildings seventy flve 75 feet tall or less shall be twenty 20 feet for 02230 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan greater than seventy five 75 feet the setback shall be thirty 30 feet Major Primary and Secondary ArterIal roads lnclude Harbor Boulevard north ofInterstate 5 Ball Road West Street DIsneyland Drive north of Ball Road Haster Street Anaheim Boulevard Avenue desIgnated for future exten sIon In the General Plan CIrculation Element Convention Way Manchester Avenue Clementine Street north of Katella Avenue Clementine Street south ofKatella Avenue desIgnated for future extension In the General Plan CIrculation Element Orangewood Avenue West Street south of Katella Avenue Adjacent to Local Streets the m1n1mum setback for bUlJd1ngs three stories or less shall be ten 10 feet for greater than three stories the mln1mum setback shall be twenty 20 feet Local Streets Include Alro Way Casa Vista Street Ox Road Vermont Avenue West Place Zeyn Street Adjacent to West Street Disneyland Drive between Katella Avenue and Ball Road the ml111mum set back shall be nineteen 19 feet to be consistent with the setback In the portion of the street located with In The Disneyland Resorl Plan 5 6 4 2 Archnectural Guideline BUlJd1ngs may be placed on the site In any manner con sistent With bu1ld1ng massing and articulation guldeUnes described In Section 5 7 The Private Realm or those conta1ned In Section 7 0 Zonlng and Development Regu lations surrounded by park1ng lots WIll be permItted provided the park1ng areas are screened as described In the following subsection Page 5 72 02231 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Spect1ic Plan Section 5 0 Design Plqn e 5 6 4 3 Clrculallan and Parking Guidelines No parking Is penn1tled between the ultimate of way and the building setback line Code Section 18 48 070 Parking may be located between the building setback line and the building face proVided It is screened by a con tinuous hedge wall or berm or combination thereoO w1th a minJmum height of 42 Inches Arrival and Visitor drop off areas may be located adJa cenl to the Setback Realm and are nol subject to the screening required for parking areas proVided they present an attractive front door appearance as Visible from the adjacent Public Realm streets 5 6 4 4 Landscape Guidelines The Setback Realm shall be fully landscaped and main tained according to the guidelines and regulations con talned In this Section and Section 7 O Zoning and Development Regulations Plants to be used w1thln the Setback Realm shall be se lected from Exhibit 5 8 3a Tree Section Matrtx and from Exhibit 5 8 3b Shrub Vine and Ground Cover Matrtx 5 6 4 5 L1ghling Guidelines Decorative lighting such as tree uplights tree down lights small lights In trees or on shrubs outdoor string lights that outl1ne bullding masses and similar lighting effects are and may be Visible from the Public Realm Extertor lights should be predominantly Incandescent or metal hallde and have a warm color hJgh pressure sodi um fixtures may be used where they are Visible from the Public Realm but should be I1mlted to areas which are not Visually prominent fluorescent lowpressure sodium and mercury vapor fixtures should not be used 5 6 5 Interior Setbacks Intertor setbacks are those setbacks not adjacent to a pub lic street The follOwing Is a of the proposed landscape treatment for the two typical conditions w1thln the Specific Plan area Also see Section 7 0 Zonlng and De velopment Standards Code Section 18 48 070 e 02232 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Page 5 74 Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 6 5 1 Interior Setbacks Between Adjacent nonresidential properties The mln1mum setback adjacent to the interior property line shall be ten feet The setback area shall be fully land scaped with trees and other plant material according to the layered landscape concept described in Section 5 3 1 5 Code Section 18 48 070 5 6 5 2 Interior Setbacks Adjacent to Residential Uses Within one hundred and fifty 150 feet of any residential or MHP Overlay Zone an open side yard setback area equal to two times the height of any proposed bu1Jding or struc ture shall be provided unless a lesser setback Is approved per a concUtional use permit Within this setback area not less than twenty feet of landscaping shall be provided adja cent to the property line The landscape area shall be plant ed with closely spaced evergreen vertical trees maxlmum ten feet on center in order to help screen the view of build ings from adjacent residential uses In adt ti hote dows and alconJes s be orien d in wa hich overloo esldential ctures mobile mes or ually intru on the p cy of suc C1wellers Co e Section 18 48 070 Wolll to plOnled wttn CInQIl lQ l lfteS 10 dcouroge glOlf1li Vel lICOlreet 10 planted OdjoCentlo PlOpetTy Ine spacing Iended 10 cleote o SCIn wlWn Ilees 1 I01 conur oIsrvub1 ONJ Of glound CO n j I I I I I lwoM eslNhelgl ll oIrneDulOIt IQ 02233 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e 5 6 6 Minimum Landscape Requiremenls All areas WIthin the Setback Realm whIch are required to be landscaped will have a mlnimum landscape requirement whIch is described In this section 5 6 6 1 Minimum Tree Density The Plan Identifies trees as a crttical element necessary to create a civic scale and trees are also needed to establish the layered landscape enVisIoned for the Setback Realm Trees In the setbacks adjacent to public streets also sup port the landscaping proposed for the Public Realm Therefore both the size and number of trees which are to be planted In the Setback Realm are regulated by the min imum landscape requirement To permit flex1bll1ty and desIgn creatiVity In landscape de sIgn the mlnimum landscape requirement recognizes that the effect of planting many smaller sized trees Is com parable to the effect created by planting fewer large trees Therefore the regulation allows for vartation In the size and number of trees However the Setback Realm land scaping adjacent to public streets must also be In con formance WIth the requirements Identified In Section 5 3 3 Layered Landscape DesIgn Crlterta which requlro f5 abalanced number oftrees plants shrubs to be planted WIthin the vartous landscaping layers 5 6 6 2 Tree to Vary According to Adjacent Use The regulation also recognizes that the densIty of trees ad jacent to some types of uses should be different than the densIty adjacent to others The densest tree planting will be required adjacent to residential uses Dense planting will also be required when Intended to screen an area as In the case adjacent to parking structures or seMce ar eas The least dense planting will be required adjacent to the public of way for hotels restaurants or other viSitor serving uses where to the public Is impor tant 5 6 6 3 The Tree Factor To differentiate one tree density from another landscape plans submItted to the CIty for approval will be required to show the Tree Density Factor for each land scape area To establish the Tree DensIty Factor all trees planted In the setback areas will have apoint value based e 02234 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Page 5 76 upon their size at installation The point value varies de pending on the size of the tree large trees have a higher pOint value than small trees the actual values are defmed below The Tree Density Factor for any landscape area is defmed as the sum of the point values for all trees in stalled diVided by the total area required to be land scaped The Spec1fic Plan establishes three levels of tree density defined as follows e Very Dense 0 8 Screening adjacent to sen sitive areas for example next to residential zones and the MHP Overlay Zone Dense 0 5 8 Screening adjacent to parking structures interi or property l1nes or the 1 5 freewayIramps Moderately Dense 0 3 5 e Landscaping adjacent to the public right of way for hotels restaurants and other viSitor serving uses 5 6 6 3aTree Density Factor Plan shows the lo cation of each density oftree planting required by the plan adjacent to all public streets and to properties borderlng the Specific Plan area All trees are also subject to amin Imum Size at the time ofinstallation 5 8 3a Tree Selection Matr1x defines the minimum permitted tree Size to be used The tree point values are defined In the follOwing table S points 5 gallon tree minimum tree size permitted In the Setback Realm 15 points IS gallon tree 02235 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e 50 points 125 points 24 Inch box canopy or vertical tree Washingtonia or Brahea species palm with a trunk 5 feet In height 36 Inch box canopy or vertical tree Washingtonia or Brahea species palm with a trunk s 20 feet In height Phoenix species palm with trunk 5 feet In height 300 points 48 Inch box canopy or vertical tree Washingtonia or Brahea species palm with atrunk 20 feet In height Phoenix species palm with trunk s 20 feet In height 600 points 1200 points 60 Inch box canopy or vertical tree Phoenix species palm with trunk 20 feet In height 72 Inch box canopy or vertical tree The total number of points for agiven landscape area within the setback must be equal to Or greater than the product of the Tree Density Factor and the area to be landscaped For example a 10 000 square foot landscape area with a factor of 5 requires the total point value of trees planted In this area to equal or exceed 5 000 pOints e 02236 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ibid The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 X j t j tal J h p T 7 I a 1 I 4 I i UI k T I X 1 L f c 11 l 2 I Ch l 6e 1 lille to I i tN oF f m tt I j r 1 e J I 1 Ji I Ti i Ii 1 L r iit I j I Il 1 5 r Ill k 1 i N f hl m 7 h N N t N I f v J jfjr u i i I C W f l i fm l r i j J i 1 nn l I e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Anaheim CalHomla Legend Tree Density Plan J lmlf or Anohem Resort Urnlt 0 Anonein Reson SpelfkPIOn boundary DesIgnated or Future Extenuon In General Plan C cutoUon Element very Dense Tree DeNny Foetor II 8 Dense Yr Foetor lIt 5 8 ModeIaretv Dense Tree DensIIy Factor 3 5 ffi o 100l 3XJ r DesIgnated FutUle GenerOl PIOn CirculOtion Elemenr r ceff IOS Avenue wII be fetocoled 1 COJ 10 1 1CO reel nonnenv 0 portion of Wesl Street wll beCome 0 CUJ deSOC West PlOCe I n e EXhlbiIS 6 6 3o Tree Density Foclor Plan e Page 5 78 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e 5 7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm Public ek 1 Realm Im Ultimote P JDliC Buidll lg I Buidoble I lIgnl Q woy l POfllOn e Section 5 0 Design Plan The Prtvate Realm Includes the prtvately owned property not Included In the Setback Realm In the previ ous section It encompasses all of the developable area of a parceL Although the prtvate Realm Is less visually promi nent than the Public Realm and the Setback Realm the de sign guidelines and standards contained in this section are Intended to help strengthen the overall quality and charac ter of development In the Specific Plan area The design guidelInes and standards serve two main purposes To ensure high quality development projects will occur over time by providing uniform design crtterta and To help m1n1mlze development costs by reducing ambigu Ity about what type of crtterla will be applied by the City when evaluating specific development proposals 5 7 1 Organization of Private Realm Design Standards and Guidelines The design guidelInes and design standards provide both the general design and the specific regulations that will guide the design of prtvate development projects Within the Spec1flc Plan area 7 1 Guidelines YS Standards In thJs Section guidelInes are considered to be general Ized rules to be applied by designers With and Judgment ta the particular condJtion which they address They are Intended to help guide designers to solutions that w1ll enhance the quality of development projects Within the Spec1flc Plan area They are not Intended to provide the only design solution to every condition a de signer might face and should not dJscourage creative and innovative solutions In situations where they apply how ever they should be followed The term standards refers to regulations that have the same authortty as the Code requirements found In Sec tion 7 0 of the AnahelIn Resort Spec1flc Plan and In Title 18 of the AnahelIn Municipal Code To distinguish stan dards from guidelInes all standards In thJs Section have been IdenUfied With the approprtate Code reference Both standards and guidelines are Included In this Section to prOvide a more complete picture of the Intent of the Spe c1flc Plan though all standards that are part of the Code are repeated In Section 7 0 of the SpecifiC Plan as welJ 02238 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Citystaff and decision makers will use both the guidelines and standards to evaluate projects for conformance with the intent and specific requirements of the Design Plan 5 7 1 2 Type 01 guidelines ond tondord The guidelines and standards which apply to the Private Realm are divided into the folloWing subsections General site Ilanninll Itrt h semt F r heme 6 f h use service area Servlce and loading areas Exterior lighting Surface parking areas Parking structure appearance appearance Signs Landscape 5 7 2 General Site Planning Site IS the process of arranging buildings land scaped areas circulation parking and service areas on a particular site 5 7 2 1 Guldelln and Standard Long unartlculated facades should not be placed adjacent to portions of the Setback Realm adjacent to public rights of way Provide landscape buffers between different land uses Code Section 18 48 070 also see Section 5 6 the Set back Realm Conceal all service areas storage areas uUUty meters and other outdoor equipment from public view Code Sec tion 18 48 0701 Incorporate service areas Into the main building whenev er pOSSible screening devices should be compatible with adjacent Screen service areas from view Page 5 80 02239 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e Am Ii se YILt park e Screen auto related facilities such as working bays stor age etc from off slte public view Code Section 18 48 070 Orlent at least one public entry toward major streets Provide direct pedestrian access from public walkways to buildings where appropriate Provide secondary entrtes to buildings from parking ar eas or tntertor pedestrian walks Design buildings to allow pedestrians to circulate around buildings without stepping into vehicular driveways Provide pedestrtan circulation between adjacent com mercial properties where approprtate Place utllities and power service lines underground Provide reciprocal easements between adjacent proper ties for shared drtveways and parking aisle connections T ipe C elll 5 7 3 Themef c n k Back aI House Service Areas 5 7 3 1 Guidelines and Standards Consolidate and screen from public view all rooftop and ground mounted service equipmentIe air conditioners fan units transformers trash collection equtpment and other service functions Code Section 18 48 050 Screen service areas and loading docks from public view Code Section 18 48 050 Screen views to service areas not otherwise screened by adjacent structures with walls berms and landscaping Screen walls will be constructed of materials which are compatible with those used on the adjacent bulldings Use landscaping to soften the visual appearance of ser vice areas Destgn service access to minimize interference with pub lic vehicular and pedestrtan movement Provlde pedestr1an crosswalks when walkways crossser vice areas Facades structures shall include treatments such as palnted surfaces integrally colored stucco score joints reveals vartations in applied material etc 5 7 4 Service and Loading Areas Although service and loading areas are important to the smooth function of uses within the Plan area they are not aesthetJcally compatible with the planned resort and enterta1nment areas It ts important that the follOwing guidelines and standards be followed so that service and Page 5 81 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan fQ x Screen seNice areas from view Page 5 82 Section 5 0 Design Plan loading areas do not detract from the visual quality of the Specific Plan area a tI U t 5 7 4 1 Guidelines and Standards Screen service areas including storage special equip ment malntenance and loading areas vlth landscaping and architectural elements such as walls to conceal these areas from adjacent buildings streets sidewalks and driveways Code Section 18 48 70 Posltlon service and loading areas to prevent disruption of the traffic flow by service vehicles to and from the site Locate loading areas entirely on site including space for truck maneuvers prohibit off site vehicle loading Code Section 18 48 070 Screen loading and service areas from streets the Free way or adjacent properties Code Section 18 48 070 Locate loading docks and service areas on interior side or rear yards concealed from pubUc view Code Section 18 48 070 Screen utility equipment and communication devices antennae satellite dishes etc so that the site appears free of all such devices Code Section 18 48 070 Install utility connections equipment for and communJcatlon underground Screen refuse collection areas from pubUc view with a soUd wall mln1mum six feet maximum eight feet high uSing materials and colors compatible with those of the adjacent Code Section 18 48 070 Locate refuse collection areas in an accessible interior side or rearyard to the satisfaction ofthe CIty Mainte nance Department Code Section 18 48 070 Construct and maintain service storage and mainte nance areas according to the following cnter a Store mater1als suppUes or equipment inside an en closed building to prevent from neighboring property and streels Screen all storage areas with soUd walls mln1mum six feet maxtmum eight feet high Construct architectural screenJng of the same materi als and compatible with the adjacent and designed and placed to complement the building deSign AU screenJng walls shall be planted with vlnes 02241 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e Prohibit extension of serv ice storage maintenance parking and loading area Into a required landscape area Code Section 18 48 070 Arrange new service stations so that buildings are locat ed adjacent to the front setback areas abutting the street and pumps service bays and other functions are located behind the building Landscape the area between the building and the street consistenily with the require ments of the setback landscape concepts 5 7 5 Exterior lighting of buildings Is Important In creating an interesting and safe environment In addition it can highlight building design features add emphasis to promi nent entrances and plazas and create an ambiance of vttal ity and security The following gUidelJnes suggest ways in which these purposes can best be served 5 7 5 1 Guidelines Relate exterior lighting to the design elements of the slle and building they serve Lighting should highlight archi tectural elements and details and not entire walls Design exterior lighting to be an Integral part of the over all architectural concept Flxlures standards and all ex posed accessories should be harmonJous with the building design and the vtsual envtronment Obtrusive lighting elements which detract from the appearance of their setting should be avoided Illuminate the entrances of buildings and parking areas to promote convenJent safe and easy identification Extertor lighting within prtvate development should com plement and not conllict with public lighting ConSider energy conservation In lighting plans Plans for the design and operaUon of lighting and illumination should be developed consistent with the lat est technical and operauonal energy conservation con cepts the use of fluorescent mercury vapor high and low pressure sodium light In areas where II might be vtsually prominent Prohibited In the Central Core Set back Realm Include extertor lighting of pedestrtan walkways v1thin private development Pedestrtan walkway lighting levels should be set relative to the level of security necessary e Page 5 83 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5C1een parking oreos rom view Page 5 84 Section 5 0 Design Plan and the mounting height of the luminaires The standards shown below are averages Higher lighting levels may be necessary to proVide for safety subject to the approval of the City Average conditions 0 5 footcandJes fc Security conditions 915 foot tall fIxtures 2 0 fc Security conditions 15 30 foot tall fixtures 4 0 fc 5 7 6 Surface Parking Areas Parking lot design Is a critical factor In the success or failure of a commercial use In conSidering the possibilities for de velopment of a parking area the followtng factors will be an alyzed Ingress and egress avoidance of pedestrtan and vehicular confliCts conflicts With street traffIc and the overall configuration and appearance of the parking area 5 7 6 1 General Parking Guideline and Slandard Pave all off street parking facilities Includlng access alsles and drtveways to standards established In Section 7 0 Zoning and Development Standards Title 18 of the Anaheim MUnJCipal Code or other applicable City stan dards Code Section 18 48 110 Maintain parking area paving as well as striping and dJ rectional markings In good condJtion at all times Code Section 18 48 110 Pro ide pavement strength of all parking areas consis tent With the expected trafilc Iffuture expansion is contemplated areas should be re served for parking expansion and indicated as such on plan submittals Whenever adriveway Is abandoned remove all drtveway pavement curb and gutter and replace the curb and gut ter and landscape the area to conform to the landscape guidelines contained In this Section Code Section 18 48 110 Separate parking areas from buildings sidewalks and plazas by alandscaped area With a mln1mum Width of 5 feet Code Section 18 48 110 Shared parking should be accommodated between adJa cent parcels when appropriate PrOVide a mln1mum six Inch curb where parking abuts landscape areas Code Section 18 48 110 Avoid heaV1ly textured paving that may create walking surface 02243 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e I U e Pedestrians move perpendicu ol to parking spaces L Section 5 0 Design Plan Mark all parking spaces clearly and permanently in con formance with City standards Code Secllon 18 48 110 Provide parking stalls for disabled persons close to the building entrance consistent with City and State stan dards Discourage surface parking excluding short term park ing associated with hotel drop off areas between the street setback and abuilding structure within one hun dred feet of a street intersection as measured from the ul llmate right of way line Surface parking Is prohibited in the Central Core between the front setback and the build lng structure 5 7 6 2 Parking Area Design Locate parking areas to the rear or If no space Is avall able to the side of whenever possible Surface parking Is in the Central Core between the front setback and the building structure Design parking facWlles in amannersuch that any vehl cle on the property will be able to maneuver to exit from the property traveling in a forward direction Code Section 1848 110 Design parking facWlles so that acar within a parking area will not have to enter astreet to move from one loca tion to another within the same site Code SecUon 18 48 11 0 Provide aslx lnch continuous raised curb on all parking stalls except parallel parking heading Into a sidewalk planting area or setback area Code SecUon 18 48 110 Use landscape areas walkways and plazas to reduce the visual Impact of large surface parking areas Landscape parking areas In accordance with the regula Uons contalned In Section 7 0 ZonJng and Development Standards and the guidelines contained In Section 5 7 1 L Encourage nght angle 90 parking stalls to minimize to tal surface area 5 7 6 3 Parking Lot Clrculotlon Design parking areas so that pedestr1ans walk parallel to moving cars Min1mize situations where pedestr1ans must cross park Ing alsles at nght angles 02244 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Vehicle queuing space vories occording to number of cors served n nm C Provide vehicle queuing space Page 5 86 Design the parking lot sO that drive aisles are perpendic ular to the main building wherever feasible Direct vehicular circulation through a parking area to the outer edge of the lot where there is less pedestrian traffic Direct vehicular circulation away from fire lanes Design the parking area to link the building to a Sidewalk system that is an extension of the pedestrian walk system through the use of design elements such as painted or en hanced paVing architectural features and or landscape treatments M1n1mize the number of entrances and exits to reduce at entries and lessen possible congestion at street intersections ProVide vehicle queuing within surface parking lots ac cording to the following standards and as measured from the ultimate public right of way Code Section 18 48 110 Number of Cars Served 1 60 61 120 120 Minimum Vehicle Queuing forty 40 feet sixty 60 feet One hundred 100 feet 5 7 7 Parking Structure Appearance Parking structures will be found throughout the Specific Plan area and their design is an Important consideration In the overall visual qualJty of the Anaheim Resort The design guidelines In this section are Intended to assure that park Ing structures Incorporate design features which make them more attractive 5 7 7 1 Guidelines and Standards Conceal views of cars parked In parking structures through acombination ofvisual barriers planting or oth er means open sided facUitles whichallow complete views of parked vehicles are not permitted Code Section 18 48 110 Articulate the elevations ofparking facUitles visible from public streets such articulation may consist ofIndenta tlons In the structure changes In color addition of ap plied elements to the surface of the facUity or other devices including the provision of alandscape buffer with a minimum width of 10 feet 02245 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Construct parking structures of masonry materials that are predominantly I1ght In color Conslder allowing vines to grow on the surfaces of parking structures on elevations of the structure that face publ1c streets Conslder adding planters for hanging or climbing vines on the elevations of the structure that face public streets Conslder stepping back parking structures above the fourth level on elevations adjacent to apubl1c street when such structures exceed four levels In helght Ifa parking structure has frontage adjacent to two or more publ1c streets consider stepping the structure back on the street with the htghest trafflc volume Conslder creating openIngS In theupperdecks that allow I1gbt to lower levels for parking structures that are only one or two levels above grade and permtt trees to be planted on grade under the that when mature wt1l extend above the structure Parking levels may be stepped or terraced to vtsually soften the overall mass ofthe structure Parking structure facade aruculatlon should create a oforder through play of I1gbt shadow and texture hortzontal or wrt1cal bN Itl g by both wrt1cal and hortzontal elements use Dp nlngo columns and beams to vtsual1y segment extertor surface and provtde acale aplIDdre1a are to be lewl and UDtform when feas1ble dtfrerenttate and veh1cular entrances Pedestrtan and veh1cular entrances ahal1 be clearly and eaat1y acceas1ble to mtn ml e pedestrtanl V confI1ct B lIltll g destgn should employ clean geometr1c forms and coordinated maaatng that produce overall uni ty acale and Interest App opI1ate treatments Include geometry unlfted composition delineation offloor levels and structure soltd parapets Facades should reflect a coordinated design concept in cluding portrayal of bt ltl g fuDctIon structure and scale Approprtate treatments Include functional destgn 02246 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relor Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan expression ofstructure With columns and beams unlty and scale reinforced through an Integrated grid module surface deUneatlon through use ofreveals mullions and receSses DetaJl1ng should be clean clear and straightforward DetaUs should reinforce overall design unlty Interest and scale Approprtate treatments Include coordinated mu1l1ons and deta1ls dellneatlon and alignment of structural connections commensurate With building materials coordinate entry spaces and landscaping Street facades shouldbe deSigned to be VIsually Interest Ing and screen parked cars from exterior views AVOid hor1zontaJ banding 5 7 1 Building Appearance Building appearance guidellnes and standards address the following elements massing shape scale and materials The Intent of these guidellnes and standards Is to IIlIlIURI a harmonious relationship between buildings In the Sped1lc Plan area Without apartlcu1ar architectural theme Tbla can beachieved by careful attenUOn to IIt1IY1g mll IYlg materla1ll and color The guIdeIlnes In this sect10n are Intended to apply to both new and renovation ofexisting ExIstIng buiJtI nlP may need more latitude In the Interpre tatlon oftbese guidellnes and standards becauae ofthelIm lted oppotoJD1ttes to make ntlmental changes In g m g for pie thanwould be JIO1le In new conatructton 1 7 L1 IuIIc1Ing MaaIng Cl eatlng attracttve m Isan Importantfactor contributing to the overaJl character ofthe Spedftc Plan area The Intent of the guidellnes 18 to promote bu1I l g m I g that 18 neb vtauaDy and creates a more and vaned urban 11Il d1CA but does not place too much Importance on BDY single 8 1111I wbich bave alarge UIId1fterenttated mua are often unattractM and detract from the Specdk P1an s gaa1 ofenc oura lDmore pedestnan act1v1ty becauae their lI1ze and 8C8le make pe destrtans feel Iucmnrortable Poge 02247 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anallelm Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan The folloWIng guldeUnes are Intended to guide designers In creattng buUdlng masses that satISfy the goals of the Plan It 1 not necessary that every guldeUne be employed In the design of every buUdlng rather each guldeUne should be Viewed as asuggesllon that should be considered for any building In the Plan area Create spaces With buUcUng masses whenever possible avoid creating buUdlng masses which are perceived as ob jects Design to be members of aharmontous group rather than Independent sculptural masses Use buUcUng massto enhance the pedestrlall scale ofthe street Increase the articulallon of buUcUng massing adja cent to major pedestr1an walks and gathertng places In crease landscape and architectural detail at the ground level Cons1der the location SIZe and scale ofneighbortng when massing new Create aharmo ntous re1atloDBh1p between adjacent fac1l1t1es regardless ofwhether or not they are on the same parcel ArtIculate the different parts of a buUdIng facade using color arrangement offacade elements achange In mate r1als or other devices Vary the height ofthe building so that It appears to be Into elements Use roof llDes to help establish the mass ofa buUcUng whenever feas1b1e the form of the rooJllI1e should physi cally represent lts function avoid mansard roofs 17 12 lUIIdIng MCIlMaIl and CaloIw The Intent of these guJdellnes 18 to encourage the use of materlals and colors that hnce the phys1cal cohesM ness ofthe area and to convey asense ofpermmence Al though no part1cular material 18 spedfIcaI1y prohIb1ted the use ofsome materta1s 18 dlscouraged hecalUe It wouJd be d1fIlcu1t to achIeve the guJdel1nea goal ofpromoting co beaIVeneas and permanence Walls The preferred dolll1DaDt material for walls 18 masonry In any of the foIJow1Dg forms natural stone including granite lIlIDdatone marble and i1meatone brick stuc co poured In pJace or precast natural coucrete sand blasted textured or aggregate and palnted concrete 02248 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Wall materials that may be used with care Include SpUt face slump or other forms of concrete block Shingle clapboard vertical or angled wood siding Use ofthe following materials will require aspecial de sign solution or other unique condition In order to be successful Exotic wood treatments such as dIStressed wood pecky cedar log cabin look stained llr plywood or gingerbread flUgree ReflectIVe mlrror glass curta1n wall Corrugated metal imitation rock work Plastic molded imitations of any conventional bu1Idlng material Silver or clear anodized aluminum sheets Im1tatlonwood s1dlng Flat or molded plastiC sheettng White brick TIlt up concrete AntIqUe or old brick with part1al pa1Dt mottled light variegated brick oversized brick and white brick mortar bet J ed nt material Cor tnms parent or Unted glasa reflectIVe or solar glasa may be used above the IIrBt floor Windows ofdark or h1gbly reflectIVe glasa are not rec ommeuded especially OIl the llrat floor elevatIOns and wID require acept1ClDlI1 or UDIqUe solutioDS to make them acceptable Roof Mater1ala When vlsIbIeIi om the street the p1efelled roof mate r1aIa 1Dclude natural colored terra cotta UIe c oucrete UIe and other np mater1ala Roof materials that wID require aspecial deeIgD solu tIoD orother 1UIlque COIId1t1oIlID order to be SUCt I f ul IDcJude wood h wood ftberg1asa sbJD glea COIDpoettloD ahlnaJ canugated metal uId ataDd 1DC metal seam raoflI 02249 PorJfI590 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e The Anaheim Re ort Plan Roo Op equipmentIntegrated Into architecture Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 7 3 Building Equipment Dlscourage wall and or WIndow mounted room air con cI1tioners unless they are concealed from public VIew or are Integrated Into the architecture lntegrate rooftop mechanlcal and uUUty equipment Into the design of the building Set rooftop screening deVIces back from the roof edge so that they are concealed from public VIew Conceal rooftop mechanlcal and uUUty eqUIpment from nearby taller with screening deVIces Code Sec tion 18 48 050 Pa1nt uUUty eqUIpment and pipes andvents visible from surrounding streets properties or to comple ment the color of the roof or wall to which they are at tached Code Section 18 48 050 Screen rooftop eqUIpment on two stories or less on all sides including from above Code Section 18 48 050 unscreened rooftop equipment Code Section 18 48 050 5 7 4 Color BuUdIng color guidelines provide another means to visu ally unify theSpecIflc Plan area by narrowtng the range of choices to agroup of colors that are visually compatible with one another Although It Is not the Intent of the guidelines to eliminate any color from consider aUon or use within the Private Rea1m the following ertte ria provide appropriate guidance for the selecuon of bltt tt g color Encourage large surface areas to be IIgbt col onel In generaJ accent elements including but not Um tted to windows doors awnIngS buDtll g trim and IIgbt flxtures may be either dark or IIgbt colored LIm1t the nt surfaces ofa g to onlycomple mentaJy colors accent areas may Include a greater vari ety of colors 1 7 1 AwnIngI AwnIngS can be used to create an space In front where people may step away from the flow of pedestrtan tra1IIc and llnd a sbady protected area 02250 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan that are continuous or broken to dllJeren lIate WIndows and display areas awnings can become an Important element In astorefront design as they may be used to unify a storefront WIth the whole Design the shape of the awning to fit the architecture Awnings that are barrel shaped segmented arches or round ended create distinctive Images but should be used sparingly and only when they do not the s architectural elements Ensure the highest point ofa floor awning not be higher than the midpoint ofthe space between the second story wtndow and the top of the floor storefront wtndow awning canopy or transom ThIs attachment should leave a comfortable space between awning and ar chitectural elements which the Ensure that the awnings do not obstruct the VIews to ad Jacent businesses Avoid awnings of more than a color per bl JI g 5 7 9 Sign 1 7 9 1 Purpoae Signs are one of the most visible design elements In the Spedflc Plan area The purpose ofestallt h ngSIgn guide 1lnes solely for the Spedflc Plan area l s to ReInforce Encourage grapbfc excellence Reduce CODfl1cts bete a signa Improve appearance ofthe Spedflc Plan area Create conaIlIteDCy amcmg signa Promote SIgn Jeglb1lIty Promotesmooth fJow oftraftlc as people are able to iden tify sites 17 9 2 IIgn liIlIIcI The guIdeIlDes below estaNI h postUW criteria for the de SIgn ofdemable signa and wbich complement the other bun ttng elements In the Sped1lc Plan area The followlDg general Ilnes abouId be COII8Idered prI or to developing signa for any development In the Sped1lc Plan area Use a briefmessage The fewer thewarda themore elIee UW the SIgn A SIgn nth abrief suc l s aJID Poge592 02251 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Re art Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan pier and faster to read looks cleaner and Is more attractive Avold faddish and bizarre typefaces Such typefaces may look good today but soon go out of style The Image con veyed may become that ofa dated and unfashion able business Avold hard to read intricate typefaces These typefaces reduce the Slgn S abWty to communicate Select sign colors and mater1als to contribute to and design Integrity Even the most carefully thought out sign may be unattractive and apoor communicator be cause of poor color selection Use contrast between the background and letter or symbol colors Ifthere Is Uttle contrast between the brightness or hue of the message ofa SIgn and Its background It w1II be to read Use complementary colors on sIgnS Too many colors overwhelm the basic function ofcommunication The col orscompete with content for the viewer s attention LIm Ited use ofthe accent colors can Increase whUe large areas ofcompeting colors tend to confuse and dIs turbo Harmonlze sign s1Ze with the scale of the structure Place sIgnS conalStent with the proportions of scale of elements withinthe facade Within ab fa cade the SIgn may be placed In dl1Ierent areas A partIc ular SIgn may flt we11 on a pla1n wall area but would ovel finer scale and proportion of the lower storefront ASIgn appropriate near the entry may look tiny and out of place above the ground level Place wall sIgnS to estabUsh facade scale and proportion where facade doesn t exist In many b that have a monoUthlc or pla1n facade signs can estabUsh or continue approprtate deslgD scale and proportiOn Usewidely recogn1zed 1ogos rather than print text when ever p thl Avoid sIgnS with strange shapes Signs that are unnee euart1y namJW or oddly shaped can restrICt the legtb111ty ofthe message Ifan unusual shape Is not symboUc It Is probably confualng Consider carefu11y the proportionof letter area to overall sign background area Ifletters take up too much sign 02252 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Tne Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan they may be harder to read Large letters are not neces sartly more legible than smaller ones A general rule Is that letters should not appear to occupy more than 75 of the sign panel area Make signs smaller Ifthey are onented to pedestrians The pedestrlan onented sign should read from a distance of Meen to twenty feet the vehlcle orlent sign Is viewed from a much greater dlstance The closer aSlgn s viewing dlstance the smaller that sign need be Design wall signs to be appropriate to the bU1ld1ng on which It IS placed The wall sign IS an Integral part ofthe bU1ld1ng facade The style ofa wall sign should be appro priate to the style of abU1ld1ngs design 5 7 9 3 America wllh DIaCIblnn Act ADA Standards All prtvate s1gns shall comply With the provls1ons of the Americans With DISabilities Act 5 7 9 4 WaR or Sign stanclardl The fol1ow1ng standards apply to wall or sIgnS Also refer to the Sign Standard Matrices Sect10n 7 0 Zonlng and DeveJopment Standards ofthe Spec1flc Plan Code Section 18 48 130 Allow two types of waD or b l1lrlt g mounted sIgnS Buaf ness ldent1ftcation tndudlng name am or logo apec1fled In Sect10n 18 48 130 0604 SIgn Standards Matrices am pedestrian or veh1c u1ar d1rec t1onal am lnformaUon slgna sa apec1fled In the Sect10n 18 48 130 0601 sa In formattcmal Regulatory am DIrecUonal Code Sec tion 18 48 130 page 594 02253 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- r e e II The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Determine size of company sign by length ofstreet frontage and or height of structure as outl1ned In ode Sections J 8 48 130 Building Face typical Sign Area typical J Maximum height of sign Is top of the building eave line or roof IInJl whlc hever Is De let eJj cf h I I nio o iJ 101 1 Oocle Exhibit 5 7 9 4tr7S1gn Area fljJ MAX tETTER HT 1 6 MAX SYMBOL HT 20 Note width of sign Is based on width of street frontage V 3O 60 60 100 100 1 50 150 wIDTH OF SmEET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA 0 30 3CIf 6011 10011 140 1 16011 ExhIbIt 5 7 9 WQI SIgn Area for Buldings Lea Than Two Stories J II MA LETTER HT 1 6 AX SYMBOL HT 20 DTH OF STREET i ONTAGE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA Note width of sign Is based on width ofstreet frontage o 311 60 60 100 100 150 150 60 It 100It 14011 160 It ExItIbIt5 7 940WOIISIgn fOf Bu k1InQJ L Than Two Stones Use only the a1lowabIe aIgD IJ1um1DatloD speclfled In Code Sec tIoD 18 48 130 The use oflDtemaIIy IIh mln ted can type box signs with whtte or I1ght colored traDaluc ent back l1t panels are not aI10wed on any structure Code Sec tIoD 18 48 130 Use aconalstent color scheme on all extertor signs Is compaUble with all other signs on the buM g and all 02254 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relart Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan lOC O D ono a 0 01 mOll or IO locatIOn af Bufld flQ Ada REGISTRATION 7 1 8 PARKING ONLY VALET PARKING COOIClIna eCJSIgn t rt l II t Proper SIgn PIoc t Page 596 freestanding Signs on the parcel Code Secl10n 18 48 130 Construct signs of permanent extertor sign materials Signs shall be attached to abu1lding without V1Sible sup ports or raceways Code Section 18 48 130 each building or store s address in 6 inch high numbers amaximum of three feet over the main entry doorway or within ten feet from the main entry Code Sec tion 18 48 130 When asingle property has multiple tenants with sepa rate storefronts multi tenant wall signs shall either use one consistent typeface for all tenants or use one color for all sign copy To enh nce the capital letter height and logo ofall tenant identUlcation signs sha1l be the same on asingle property Code Section 18 48 1301 Multi tenant wall signs sha1l either be all wall signs or all canopy signs except for hotel motel accesaOrt uses Code Section 18 48 1301 Canopy signs will be considered wall signs within the Spec1ftc Plan area Code Section 18 48 1301 Prohibit the use of permanent come onsigns Code Sec tion 18 48 1301 5 79 on DIo cllanal Sign Slandaldl Ensure that on site dlrect1oDa1 gJrI C and lDforma tion are d l Ved as part ofa coordlDated arch1tec tIU allDformauon regulatory and d1rect1ona1 sIgD sylItem for the pioject With CODlIIstent dealgD and color scheme Code Sect10n 18 48 1301 Ensure that sIgD placement ofon site dlrecUonal and In format1oDal Is In theappl O Mlate zone for VlewIDg by pedestrtans and from fth1 and c aulorms to local state or nat10Dal codes Code Sectlon 18 48 1301 Use oflogo or company symbol on may be conald erect provlded that these do not occupy more thaJ125llt of thesIgD area for thelDd1vIdual sIgD upon these are lDcluded Code Sect10n 18 48 1301 02255 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 7 9 6 Window Sign tlldalln4 11 Standards The following g1 relate to all Window tion Signs StM llWD I Apply signs to interior ofwindow surface only Signs ap pUed to the exterior ofwindow surfaces are prohibited Code Section 18 48 130 Allow painted screen printed or leafed letters andIor logo only Limit signcopy to name andIorlogo ofbusiness Code Section 18 48 130 size to a of 10 ofwindow ar ea Sign layout shall be positioned so views Into the pre mises are not obstructed Code Section 18 48 130 ILIVAIION 1 211Cl11Y IUIDI NOT 10 EllCIED l0 0Of EJttJ b t 57 96o linIfArea of Wlnc ow SIQns SJgn may VlUY to mQdate logo tmdl or company name Code SectIon 18 48 130 Use only one sign per gIasa window panel two maximum per bua1nesa Code SectIon 18 48 130 Neon sIgDa tmd plaques or sIgDa suspended htnd the gIasa are not allowed Code Sect10n 18 48 130 02256 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 7 10 Landscape 5 7 10 1 SlIe Landscape Guidelines and Standards Design landscape and open space areas to be an Integral part of the overall site plan design Use trees to define and enclose extertor spaces and to provide physical protection from the sun and wind Provide for landscaped open space areas that enhance the building design and public views and provide buffers and transitions between adjacent uses Use trees shrubs and vtnes to conceal walls building el evatlons and parking facll1t1es Use arbors trellises walls gates and other elements to reinforce the architecture of adjacent buildings land scape structures should be compatible and consIStent With the architectural treatment of the adjacent build Ings Screen undeveloped vacant land Intended for future phases With plants that prevent wind and water eroa1on Code Section 18 48 0501 Space plants to assure unobstructed VISual access for vehicles and pedestrtans Ensure that plant materials do not Interfere With securt ty lighting ar restr1ct 8CCelIlI to emergency apparatus such as lire hydrants or lire alarm boxes 1 7 1G 2SUrfaCe ParlcIng ANa LA lncIIeapIng QUld 1MI ancl Ilandaldl The following guldellnes and standards are Intend to apply to surface parking areas genera11y acer 1Nl to the public such as thaee fouDd adjace nt to a hoteL Use trees With a8P canopy In parking areas auf tlcIent to COWl at leut ofthe parking surface With m jf tree canopyWithin llve years oflDatallat1oa Require ODe tree ofa 24 beD size for each ten ArborI and gatfII parking spaces Code SectIon 18 48 1001 Dlatnbute the requlrecl trees througbout the parking area Code Sectlca 18 48 1001 Mus trees In large plantei llWithin the parking area In parking lots With than 50 spaces to reduce the ap parent size ofthe lot Enaure that the Jowut tree br9n hes be than six feet above the IInIah grade at the base of the tree to pre vent mgoe li om automob1Jea Landscaping aeta atground level rrells 02257 Page 598 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e e e The Anallelm Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Screen parking areas from publlc streets In the following manner Code SecUon 18 48 1001 low evergreen shrub masses or landscaped berms that conceal parking areas or acomblnaUon of the two 5 7 10 3 Dellgn Provide simple bold and easy to maintain landscape planUng desIgnS which Incorporate many drought toler ant plant mater1als Landscape elements vtsible from the public r1ght of way should blend with and seem apart of the publlc of waylandscaping See Sectlon 5 6 the Setback Realm Provide amlx ofplant matel1al sIZes In Informal planUng The following Is atypical mlx ofplant sizes for an Informal planUng Trees 30 24 lnch bolt 60 15 gallon 10 5 gallon Shrubs 60 5 gallon 40 1 gallon Ground cover 100 coverage withln 1 year Provide for plant palettes that lDclude both long and short 1Md plant materials Long 1Md mater1als lDclude trees and most shrubs short 1Md mater1als lDclude pc pnI lIDDuala and some shrubs See Sect10n 5 S 4 PlaDt Palette Select plant mater1alswhichare suited to thesm1 and cI1 maUCc ond1Uoas ofthe lISte the uae of ter through the seIect10n ofplants that are drougbt tolerant wben they are mature Space treea and shrubs with conalderatloD for thelr ulU mate stze Ensure that aD ground cover Is healthy and densely foll ated and Is comprised ofwell rooted cuttIngS or container plants Ground COftrS planted from flats should be plant ed DO more than eighteen lDches 1S on center One gaI 11m container grouml cover should be planted no more than four feet 4on center 02258 Page ---PAGE BREAK--- TIle Ana elm Re art Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 7 10 4 Pede lrtan Paving G Jldellne These guldel1nes for pedestrtan pavements apply to all paved areas on private property Intended for use by pe destrlans including areas to be used by both pedestrians and vehicles Pedestrtan pavements may Include but are not necessartly limited 10 sidewalks paths walkways courtyards and plazas Desirable qualltles ofpedestrtan paVIng surfaces asurface texture rough enough to prevent sUpping but smooth enough to prevent stumbling maintenance free stain resIStant fade resIStant non refiect1Ve Acceptable pedestrian paVIng materials concrete broom salt heavy sand blasted colored concrete stamped and saw cut concrete provided the pattern does not have joints or score l1nes that catch high heels or cause tripping unit pavers including brick stone concrete and Ule provided thepavers do nothaveJoints orscore l1nes that catch high heels or cause tripping Pedestrlan paVIng surfaces wh1ch may be used In situa tionswhere the l1mttaUons of thematenal have been con sidered Include decompo8ed granite not SUitable for use where d1S abled at ee8II eh JJd be provided loolIe gravel not SUitable for usewhere dl bl accesa should be or where heavy pedestrIaD traIIIc caDbeapec tedl wb1te orVf rY colored paVIng not SUitable where glare from the swfiIce will a1rect pedestrtaD safety uphalt not SUitable where the uphalt 18 Ukely to be come 80ft on hot dayal woodeD boardwalk type paVIng not SUitable where heels catch In thec ncka bo8rdal Unacceptable pedeat a1an paVIng aurfacea Include stamped coacrete or unit pavers with deep J OUDded joints or ICOre linea aDdjoints that arewider ttum 1 4 Turf block Page 5 100 02259 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anallelm R sort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Properly Ine Minimum 2foot wide landSCape area with shrubs and vines j Clinging vines on visible vertiCal surtacesof wall 1 Boundary waD Retalnng waD Where walk IS adjacent to wol Engneertng Standard No 137 Provide landscape areas for shrubs and vines when changing grade atproperty Ones 5 7 10 5 Landscape Wall and Fence Guidelines and Standard Use walls and fences for securtty vtsual screening and aesthetic purposes Ensure that walls and fences are consIStent With the ar chitecture of the adjacent bu1ld1ng In terms ofmaterial color and form AvoId walls which feature long unartlculated surfaces Use pUasters heIght vartation setback vartation land scaping and surface texture to vaJY the wall surface Provtde walls and fences that are of the follow1ng pre ferred matertaJs masonry wrought Iron and painted sted tubing Wood and uncoated chain link fences should not be used In publiC view Coated fences can be used within public view If adense landscape buffer Is In front of the fence or If vines are planted on the fence Proh1b1t walls from encroaching Into areas needed for safe ilstance Code SectIon 18 48 070 Ensure that walls Intended to screen storage or refuse areas outdoor mechanical equipment or to provtde sep aration between dlfrerent uses at aproperty line be of ma sonry construction and not be less than six nor more than a maximum ofeight feet In height Code SectIon 18 48 070 Proh1b1t walls and fences greater than thirty Six Inches Inheight w1thIn the required setbacka adjaeent to public streets the Setback Realm except where permitted In Sect10n 7 0 Z and Development Standarda Cover walls Pc e to the public With 1Iv1ng vInea In order to discourage grafBU and enhance the appearance of the fence and or wall 17 10 6IIr1QCr11Oft 8uIdellMl The Intent ofthe In1gatlon guidelines and standarda Is to provlde for adequate ln1ptlon coverage wh11e eIIldently conserving water irrigate all pernu I nt p or required laDd ac ape With a perm nmt underground In1gatlon system that Is operated by lID automat1C In1gatlon COD troller irrigate turf With low gallon spray heads With a mInlmum Six 1nch popup body Use U1aDgUIar g of spray heada In turf whenever fenlble 02260 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Irrlgate shrub areas With low gallon spray heads When approprtate drtp Irrtgation should be provided In shrub areas Irrlgate individual shrubs With a pressure compensation bubbler With low flow charactertstics Irrlgate at night and early morning to reduce evaporation due to sun and WInd Apply Irrtgation water In multiple short applications to reduce runoff on to areas not needing irrigation Ensure that Irrlgation water Is not applied to walks dr1veways walls fences and bu1iding faces Provide methods ofretAIning Irrtgation runoffwater on SIte It should not flow on to other property or the publ1c ngbt of way ProvIde approved backflow preventers on all systems Screen from public view equipment includ Ing backflow preventers and controller boxes Jnstall automatic valves In valve boxes and use popup spray heads whenever feasible 5 7 107 Landlcape Maintenance Malntaln all landscape mater1aia Including trees shrubs ground covers and vtnes In ahealthy condltion at all tlmes Remove m ged dead or dlseued plant material and replace ItWith plants that match the origi nal destgn Intent In terms ofsue location and variety Remove owrgrown owrsIZed or hazardoua plant mate r1aIa when they cannot be pruned to asafe condition and threaten publ1c health safety or weIlBre Prepare and show on Ian pe p1ana ma1nt fledUOaa theIn1gatton pruning weeding ferUl1zer llJlI ll and otherpertinent ma1ntenance crt terIa for aJll pect areas POQtI 50 102 02261 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The AnaheIm teoort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 8 Design Plan Reference Summary This subsection contalns a summary of the design stan dards and guideUnes contalned within the Design Plan that apply to the publlc of way the Publlc Realm and the adjacent setbacks the Setback Realm It also contaInS de sign standards that apply to streets which continue outside the Specific Plan area such as Harbor Boulevard and Ka tella Avenue The Intent Is to summanze In one location the street of way widths setback and height reg ulations and landscape concepts In order to ahow the rela tionship between these various elements It Is dMded IDto two parts full crosssections andhalf cross secttons Among the full cross sections are cross sections of Harbor Boulevard KateUa Avenue o Walnut Street o West Street DIsneyland DrIve between 1 5 and Ball Road o West Street DIsneyland DrIve between Cen1tos Avenue and KateUa Avenue o West Street south of Katella Avenue o BaD Road o Clementine Street o Manchester Avenue FreMwnan Way o Anaheim Boulevard Hasler Street o Conventton Way o Pad1Ico Avenue betw Harbor Boulevard and Hasler Street o Orangewood Avenue o Typ1cal Local Streets oAJro Way oeua Vlata Street oOx Road oVermontAvenue oWest Place oZeyn Street The Intent Is to lIhaw full street cross secttona for aD streets In the SpecI1Ic Plan Area Because there Is 0D1y one cross aecttoD for e8Ch street these cross are typical and may not apply to every aitUatloD IIIoDg the specl1lc street 02262 PaQe ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Page 5104 In order to show all along the edges of each De velopment Area the second part of this subsection contains half street cross sections that Wustrate every situation 5 8 1 Full Street Reference Plan and Cross Secttons Exhibit 5 8 1a shows the location ofeach ofthe full street crosssections It IS followed by the cross sections referred to In the reference plan 02283 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e l The Anaheim e art Ian Section 5 0 Design Plan I j I I A H J I J j pDr on ay A I Q I I The AnaI IeIm hIort Specllc Plan Anaheim CaIIwmIa Full Street Croll SectIon Key gencI 1 LmIl of Anahetm Resort llDl 2llOO teet ffi Ananem Resort Plan Boundary Fune Extenllon In General Plan C ElImenI 0eIIgna1Id Future AIgIrnent In Genefal Plan CIreulattona ment t rt C oSec tton LocatIOn Dtrectlon 01View o o terrttOl Avenue wi be relOCatlId 1 lXXl to 100 INtnortIlertV a porIIon of Well StrNI wi become a cul cle laC Well Place Extr1b1158 o FufI CIQII Section Refetence Plan 02264 Page5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan rFr locOOO ocooln hUCI v Ol ld grouno co PedeImQ ISldeWOll Ol tr and Jmno conoaV J plOtl d In tr w PullIc I I li I j j I I i lO r J J I I I 1 1 1 I t 0 311 11 60 I trO eoft I NcIII NIftOllll a a WCIIr l ID A I AI Harbor loulevarct from Intentate 5 to Vermont Avenue ExhibIt 6 atDOr 80uIevard NOI1tI oIln FuI Croa Section Page l06 02265 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e lk The Anaheim Re arl Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Fence to J JMdium Of large canopy treeI median anCl 01 tjW CJfCUftO 10 CCII at DC IMelIIn parkwayana rnedlcIn typICQI J Fence 10 tMt PlOnlea Wdlilla ln Of i 01 ana t ICIIltWOr CIIItDwn IllDIKf CaIlano CIy I f I j i I I I I vaIeI 11 11 1IDuII wafa rJJI u n CDlea A2 AZ Harbor Boulevard EJtIIIbIt 5 Ic HatDor 1ouMI lot1 atwHn In kl 5 and A on ItIe fait SICIe and 15010 250 South 01 Monchel1WA on ItIe west SICIe FtAStrN C Section 02266 PageS I07 ---PAGE BREAK--- zr The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan l lanatcQOe e 1tIQ ot glound co and Of h lrr lov ecllOl dlCDOe c 01 II Jor Qrouno COvel verttcot with In at DaM Y IWO I 32 on e tef 1yJ Ie0l e j e on medlCl l two 32 on center typICal ftxtut with PlanMg on OUf CIIO bQnnenIln OQrkwayoncI G O 0 barrlIIr IhtUCI meGlan Iyplcal cuno coverand or l If 1 j I I i j II e IJ r 1 s It acl NIt I 7111 lICIN Gf WGf 1 11D 11IM 01 WG a fW aIClftIIl I DW to CIIlIlIO lICIat C1f A3 Harbor lou vard Exh tllt 58 d HCIIDOt IoIMvatd Ile OratIQewOOd A ueand Moncn terAvenue onlhe EOII SIde and 50 to 250 FHt Sou Avenue onlhe Wetf SIde Full Str 1C tit Page 5 08 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re art Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e lCIYWtIO lOtICIICape ConIII1IOI nuDs grOU ld eovoncIlur1 g I 24 on e 1 I IClIgn IJ I portwavano mec2Ian 1ypiC0I lovert llOnOlCOpe Mrcoet or 01 O ounoj cover ana fUll OO roworoor POImIo Iwenly IOUI eer 24 on cenfer Grouna cover may n1UOeMl QICM nCI cover SI lNtlI f 1 i 1 r i e I I IlIIXIcIIeaIn Dr 141 a I I k 11 n to 12 D u naIeaA fIgM of wQIt 1 10 66 n frIote 4 wGW CIIMMOnIOIe IypCGI ana wary 1I OWf ID OI e KClfella Avenue Qnterm condl1lOn travel lanes 1400 Ebl ur CI ExftIbIt 5 B le KateIo Aven Eo of lit Sf 1 8 TJ 8 FIJIStteet Cross Section 02268 pQQ8 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResartSpecific Plan Section B O Design Plan tbock or ftuDf ground e rowof 001 PalmI tweMv40ur 24 on centef I j win DannelS In 1MdIon I PlCCII L landlCoge In IItfbOek or hubS ouncIj cowtrOl ldll l1 owOlea PamI t ry tOll t 2 a oncentef Qfouna CO 4I may we f cover Of I f f i i I I I I In JeI QdlIearn br 1 1 TTl I I1rt I l1ft 40ft to I2 a to art A DI lIa 1 I c at IIlGL A IyDICGICRI lIarY 110m Nwft eIf KateRa Avenue ultmafe wtth tour Iravellanet 1plocrr SD lIlf o rJ EJItlICIt 6B If K A EOIt of Ill rllt an Fu6 Croa SecIlOn PQ Ie5 10 Q2269 e e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e La IOndscoQe lletOOCk 10 ConIIIl ot 1l l1U1 s MttS and ground COI itI ertlCOJ and l Ionzonloloyen O G G I IPQCed meaUfl conooy If Landscape on gtOUI ICIrT G te gfQUl lCIcov ondor ono tnay tillDelmed I I If f Jt i Ii I AeaIn Dw IanOOwner jL j 7 n aIan 1ft 3D1t I I 11 JDfI ft U1t 7 y CIfIt C Walnut Street e ExhibIt 5 B 1Q WO 1ut SIr FIJI SIr Croa StIon 02270 Page ---PAGE BREAK--- TIle Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e s ttMac lI InOIeGIDetoc ot If NtlI QIOUftdco CIl ICUor OlDIIII Ig too r l I I I I I f li e I I J J to Y K ti dIae r Dl Dl Welt snet Dllneyland DrIY North or laD Road ExtIl IIt58 hwest S tIDIItIr IanQ DtIve Notth of801 Rood Full c s cttotl e POQfI5 112 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Relart Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan SettlOdttondlcopeIoCCll lIIITOItlMI sPllUtll grOllnOCOYeI oncI Ol turf deugn to D111QyefeCl anoocooo PlOeSlnan w o d 1 10 ConMf OfotemOlng Ol and meaun 01I Jrge canopy MI PIonnngon rnov co anGlorlulf 1 1 If i t I II f i I Ji I I I 1IIIblXt I 1 J I rd II II mecICW t I Itft c5 AnarWft c 4 ft CIIf n DIICt D2 20 West 5treef Dllneyland DrIve Between Cerrito Avenue and Kcnuo Avenue ExhibIt 5 8 IIWest S IDiInfIyIarta OlIve Between Centos Avenue ancJ KateIa Al lItlue FuI S Cr Sectton PO 185 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim RelOr Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e to C 01 nvtlI grouna C0Yef and or turf e 1 1 I I I i i I I I I or a C J I 2 2 I I I I 12 1 L 13 I lU 10 1111 It It ar ft e 0 1 0 1 West 5trHt South of KateDa Avenue ExhIbIt 58 W South of KaMIo A ue SlJcIlOn e POQflS 1I4 ---PAGE BREAK--- lhe Anaheim Re art Speellle Ian Section 5 0 Design Plan e 5rfIbOCk tindleapt10 eOIlIlIt of QJOUnd cower antVOf IUd 0lCIl l1hg dll9l1ODe aoterecIlandlCape cO J P1antng on ground ona OlMl pI f f i i I L I I or I to 1IIt vG a lft 1 I a 1I liltI ar Clr 04 04 West Place Cul de Sac e ExhIbIt 5 8 k WeIt Place C rtIH CIOIIS Secllon 02274 POQe 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Anallelm R ort Ian Section 5 0 Design Plan 1OtICIIC to co 01 hUDI vi leI ana ground CDVel e 01 lClIo canooy to be pIOnMd In lQtIc2ICao aponcwoy j i i I I i Ii il l Ii I i i I I I 1 I r 71 11 A U 1O UIt 1Otft ll T l 1 10 l 11aft I I CIf El l Ian Road Extl bIt51 11 1IoI Rooa W or w Place FuI ClOG SecflOll e 02275 POQe 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim RelOr Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan IandlCape 10 CaraT 0 InnJtII and ground cover orlarge canoovtlM r 10 o oa aoea J I I PIbk a i I I g i I I I I I I JJ ir j J tfOveIlCIneI pan I I 2D It ft I 11 ft tD Uft WICIW to cem tne a s AnaI wm uOf UIeIeCIIt 01 IalIIOOd of 106ft a E2 I BaD Road EJdI DIt58 In IlOl RoQQ Ecxt Of wen Place FYI Croll s ctton 02276 Page 51 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan J woy Of YertIcoI trMs CJnG ormeClIum CO lCC y on Qlounc may IncluOe coverana or ltt ton l co 01 ImON conoDV IF ground co ancI OIf lrI e I l f j I f Iiji I I I e 11 J J Z I CIIaIICInl ec itowe 0 I I 12 at 12 I I ID Q l1t I tD CU 4IDf 17 w CIt Ff Clementine Street EJdlIbIt 58 1P C1emen C Section e POQe 5118 022n ---PAGE BREAK--- Th Anall lm R orl Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan SrDOek lOndIcaoe to CorGT of Tr huDI orouna COYer and orturf o n 10 be Iayere IlQnOII aoe P OIl 5tr ees In oorkwoyt onct median to C 01 OIl malln trees ond 11 I I01 01 meOiUm canopy I HI W OOeQUote rtgpermItS rees pattWO lS to corwst or alte noflnQ rtlcal ono tmOB canopy tree ty toUl 24 on cent 1 1 f f i i 1 1 l I L br J I ft 3 ean M I A IteIortu WGV d woy lll It car G Way ExhIbIt 58 IQ Way NI Str CrOllSection 02278 I Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relall Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e JS ltloc tICrlalcODeIOC oIl1eea 1fVUDI coverO l1fJ01N1 1 10 l ce and ImCII Cll meca m onCPOUllOlIlG ICONill otturtanGICll lJO IlCIcover Ii f 7 lo t l JI f l r r f rl i i f l N FI l I L f i I I f i I I e I WII I WIlIII II I I I 1Jf s 1 ID I DI 0 H Anahelm IouIevard Haster e ExttIbIt 5 nahem 8ouIeVC1tCVHa6I FuI S tCrOll SectIOn 02279 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re or Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e I j 1 1 Roam f f i i l I e I I L l II 10ft wtaI lto Mtt U r 0 Ion WfCItn to 56 7IfI c on n onWa doWOr 110 010 I I Convention Way EJChIbIt 5 8 I conventton Way Full SIT ClOG Sectton e 02280 PageS ---PAGE BREAK--- Th Anoh lm R or Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan sd l ft Qc IQnaxCI 10 C attr a lUtll ground J PeOtirtrlan ItMWOIk CClnary IIIOnd Oar Pam l 01IwQyI ono mec llal lll s PlIm l meaia plOntll lg Of lorge UC l IQt lI Ofooa gr ItVuCS 1 f i J I i j J I i j i I s tDOCl I Vl prl i l rlj l L 2IlI JOlt 71 JU 10 1a SI I 10 to II Pal IICo A ItghtoOf 110 A IIOIVl Iatl 1ftOwn 10 01 CIy J J Avenue Between Harbor Boulevard and Halfer street future Propoaed EJCflIbf 58 It I QC tIco Avenue BetwHn HatbOt BouIevatO ana Harter SIr FlJIute FIJI SIr CfOII Sectlorl page 5122 02281 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Pedettrlan walk r J on ground may lncluOe groUI IC COvel and Ollurf I i i I I I 11 11 10 J L r ft In a ft WIdIlto rt 0 J 9 d war to IypICQI K K Orangewood Avenue Jnt t Wi I V jJ t or 0JJ l IoJl Se C v tf S 0 rJ EJtIl bIt58 1u OranQewooa AlIeIlue FIJI ClOG Sectton 02282 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim e ol1 Plan Section S O Design Plan SlItOock IOndEQOtI to l at frees Inr JCI Ql ouno co and or luff ponTll lQ ae10 011 Oyefe lIOl lOlcOge e P oettnan Str and meolOtl to COl I 0 art noting verTICal ees orK l sma or meoun carJOOY II 1 1 1 1 i It i I i I J I I JI L4I l J 2 2 r I 13 1 1 Jilt ft to an 4 A OI I r A 1 fII car L1 L1 Manchester Avenue West and Mid Portion EJdlItI t 5 8 II Manchelter Avenue W ana MIeI PortIorw FuI Street Croa Section e Poge5 124 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e TIle Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Selbaelt IQndIc CI eto cOf IIIIf or I 1 uI ground COvel ondlOl turf d nto De lOyelecIlon01CCl PedelIIIan IiCMwoIk 1 rr cOf 4lllof an g IICOIlfHS and small or medIUm COOOO fI S j I I j I 1111 12ft aD 1D n tD 37 Ml vI Avenue or 61 fl or yJ f AIgftt ol wov L IlIpoItwoy wtdI I UltfN no I Dv C cn typIca r L2 L2 Manch rAv nue Portion AdJacent to 1 5 Freeway North of Ado Way EJItlIbIt 5 8 1w Monchelter Avenue pottton ACfOCent to 1 5 Ft woy NOIttlof Ano Way FuI Strt CIOa SectIOn 02264 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan Seltlack lanalCaoe to COtlIW01 hHS nubl grouncl CDVel anellof lUff deIIgn 10 b oce Str tr llI I oorkw IVIto 0 atternorng 1COI1ancI 01 01 medIUm cQnoPY Ir I I I i I i I i I I I Ii i I I I LVJ II pGItwOt I 4 no I I I r I ar 1 r J r I I I h I lOft 1111 2 A worVQIIII t 1 car La La Manchester Avenue Portion Adjacent to 1 6 Freeway South of KateUa Avenue ExIlI t 5 I t MofIC AOWIUlJ10t1I0tl A t to1 6FfNway South ofKateIIa AOWIUlJ ClOGs cnon Page So 126 0228s e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design PlCUl k Ql etoC ftuDs gro na C anCHor f Jrf OellQn to De IQywfed IClnOIICOpe WOk I oooopy PIOnMgO 9 0IJnc l meclUcIe QlOund cOvttr ana or I1JI1 I 1 1 1 i J i I c 6ft 1 J 1 ft I 1 3 fl 10 11 3011 I 1SP 10 we J l ODaI 1Igf It01 n1 eQft ers ttr Local street Alro Way ExhibIt 58 Hocm StreeMto Way FuIStree CIOII Secllon 02288 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- TIle Anohelm Re ort rICIn Section 15 0 Design Plan e I r 1 I f i i I I e l sRt IOft It 30 I 3Sp l fI r r Cl r t r Local Street Cola Vlata Street EJth Ct 5 8 Iz tocQ StrN COlQ Vllto Str FIJI S Croa Section 02287 e Poge 5128 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anohelm e ort SpeCIIIC Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan I g i I I i J 7 Jc 4 1 1 J I 4ft 1 I I s 10ft 10 UIcaI at MIL Or ES t Local Street Ox Road I 35f 10ft EXhIbIt 5 8 1aoocQ StrH Ox Root1 FIJI SIr Croa SectIOn 02288 POQfl5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re arl Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan I1 canoo c Jrl No f kLJoj Ifee JeU J Dc let cf SJcJ 11 Pubic lleam 1 1 I i I I if i I I tree v ells lied Sdf1c r IU fft lift alt I zsf @ la LocCIf IIgNDf la u Local street Vermont Avenue tIIbIt 58 IQD iOCQ S VemJOII A FIJIStrH CIOII s cnon Page 5130 e e Q2289 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anallelm Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e SefOocIrIOnOICQOe to COt I oIl 1hruDa Ql oundcover ana or IUlI C InMg CMIIgn 10 De Iayltfeo lOnGIeoo f SrnoIormeoll mC I Planting on ground may inClude ground VI COvel andlOllurl 1 1 1 Pul Ic f f i i j j I h 1 sf IOIt 101t I ft I 3Sf @ lOlt It LOeCIl ot wor 6D aaIM I l i ftl V Local Street Zeyn Street EJtI JIbIt 58 1 oc LocQ Street Zeyn Strt FIJI Street CrOll SectIOn Q2290 e POQfl5 131 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relor Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5 8 2 Half Street Reference Plan and Cross Sections The on the following page shows the location of the Setback Realm the Specific Plan Area It Is followed by the cross sections that the conditions at all edg es of development The numbertng ofthe cross sections Is not In sequence since some ofthe crosssections correspond wtth crosssections In The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan document All required setbacks are measured from the ul timate planned of way SeveraI ofthe streets are adJa cent to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area as well as to the adopted DIsneyland Resort and Hotel Circle Spec1flc Plan areas For these cases the Setback Realm in formation Is only shown for the Anaheim Resort Spec1flc Plan area Setbacks for properties the other Specific Plan areas are not depicted 02291 e Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e The Anallelm Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan ilt t i r 23 23 41 41 41 21 37 r I ii oc i 8 34a 36 V I 11 1 X f 16 J1 Jr r I I L 10 i i r 13 Y l r I I I j DOl OfI Ofy 6 l hli 22I 3 e r r r 4t 1f j 31 45 1 A 0 y 312 e 4 I AI I i I I IIofll The Anaheim R OIt Plan Anaheim CaUfomIa Half Street Cro Section Key Legend r Li nII01 Anonern Resort AnaIMIm Reoort SpecllIc Plan Bounclary 0eIIgnat8d tor Future ExtenIIOn n General Plan Qculalton elemenl Future AIgrYnenI n General Plan OCulalton Elemenl 32 Locanon at Hall I Croll SecIlOn and Iclenlll Wlg runt er Croa Sec1ton 28 adlaCent to 01t MK eornm ctCII Zaneol EB o UXIl 2000 L f C AvenuewllDe 1 CIOOIO D 1 100 I nortnerIy apol Ian 0 1 Well SIr 1 w llecome a Cuf le sac Well PlCICel Nale AI kateIa Avenue HCIIbor IouleYard KatelIa Avenue AnaIMIm IouIevard SIr HOIl louevarcl ConvenIIaf Wavl me wiClef IhCIn dlIr ICled on a 1IOn 10 accomaclate Tt 1 t a J I r1ght and Iltn tun lanes ArvJ iky Croa Sec 1Ion 30 acl OcenllO Ilal and rnollIeI1ome I Exn blt S B 2o Half Srr Crass SectIOn Reference Plan 02292 PageS ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan lQVel ed landsCape tDoek COnIItI 01 IIHIIl IruOL ground CO oncIlurf 001Jble row orDale Double row ot Dole orns twenlV IOuf ee NOms wenty lour 2 on c 2 1 on cent j Ibrtures on grouna wnn canners COWf I C IuGe turf IX8WOVancl gtOYnCICO OlIl VUOl 0 1 ry CX I J II 51 II JI l al ldIcOpIIn SeIbOcl IU tD l2toUft of tol66 c 3a KateDa Avenue Interim Condition with Three Trave Lane ExIlIbIt 5 8 2t HaIf Str CIOI SectlOn 3D KatelaA IWIIW Intettn Condition witt Thtee raveI LonwJ Page 50 34 02293 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e OauDle lOW Of Date Potma twenty roul f t 2 on cent on glOUnd c l tul ground cover or IhIUOS I I Il oc oam I I i I I LOl cIJooe In 5etbOCt AtlcI n bot IanCIOWMf j oam Stda r r 11ft 1ft 1ft 1ft 41JOW1ta I lift 1210 W1Cftt l1O C l 12 to Uunmate ICOtlIIa A 1tgM of way164 to 166 e M OI 3b Katella Avenue Ultimate Condition with Four Trave Lane e ExIlIbIt 58 2c Sit Cro SecIlOn3DKat Io Avenue U1ttnate CondItIOn wIttl Foul TlaveI Lones 02294 Page 5 135 ---PAGE BREAK--- Th Anaheim ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan LcwefttdIOnCUCao 01 ubI grouna eo r ana at tv I anic Ol ftH 1I Ifl l vines Planlea 01 Dose f two e In on cent L lMaun orIClrge Canoov rr PCIIlway onCl rneGIan VIWO ree on c nhl 32 rygiCQ 1 1OI pOrkwoyana I PIan g on grouncI to of on J c I f i I L nletDacll L U l aWIn 101 1 6 Harbor Boulevard Setback ExhIbIt5 B 2d HaII CfOGSectlOtl6 Ho COl BouIeIlOfd BetwOfongeWOOCl A to Moncnerr r AVWlue0 1 EOIf SlOe and 160 to 260 fH Soutfl of Moncne JwAVWlue 0 1 W SlOe P 5 136 02295 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The AnaheIm Re arl Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Medium Oi 1OrQ canopy trees partwoY and medcn lf l ty IWO I 32 on cenl f typICal fiafu Nil j on ground 10 bannerS poIlwayand c of DOn r l uuDS rypcol grour1O COYeI and or No Of vinesoncl OQfItWCIY tyee as WIOwn DItIC llo DPProVOl 01 COItiON ana me City s tbadI Atom hen f j I HncefO ar waI MlIIttIO appowmol CoIlaNand CIy DwaI WGIIIIlnOft to2DfMt IIdJ I ClI lllINCIy i 10ft OW waIY 31ft WIlII ltD 51 61ft Harbor lO N i arCI way 102 101 rt IOrYlIroriI nctto CIIV a Harbor Boulevard Between Manchester Avenue 5 Freeway ExtlIbIt 5Bz HaIf Str Croa Section B Hamor Manchelter Avenue on the EOIf and 150 0 250 South of Mancheltet A ue on the West SIde and the 15 02296 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The AnaheIm Plein Section 5 0 Desjgn Plo n SlIfbOCW IandICaDlI to C onIlI1 01 trtte INUbI gr co OtW3 orturf j Sh In ond ClIDrl to Cor lIII1 at af notng Ql ana mtKl m Of IQlge C CJnoPY l l mC y NbL Qrounc I co oncI Ot turf I LQ J It 2 I 7 0 V 1 t 1lI West Street Setback Betw n Katella Avenue and CerrIto Avenue EJdtII IIt5 IJ2f HoIr SlIM Croll s ctlOn 10 W OlIve twMn KaNIa Awnw ana CIHtItoI A l 10 Page 5 138 02297 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Re art Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 1 LorecllanGlcaoe In Cock COfUllfSO ltlruC grouncl cover ono turf OUtlle rOw 01 Del ROjOIe row 01 001 Palms Iwenry lovr I pOlfTIs l ty lCl ll l 2 on cenler 2 1 on c n I jSOOc IlO 1 0 S wdt oonnetS I lCluQe turf grOUl lO fJOIlwoY ana covet Oth IC I I tMdiOn 1 I l f i I l O etfje ecr1 Slt 0 cr C WJI 5 tof rI Lcnc c lpe In 5etboCi J 20ft A liIfd oI 1 DIIfII 13 Katella Avenue Setback Between We street DIsneyland Drlve Walnut Street Ext1 01 5 82rr HaIf Sir Crou sectton IJ KatefOAven 8elwHn west S OIJneytOnd Ortve Waonuf Sf I Ulttnote 02298 poge 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Se1DOCk IQnQICQCle 10 conIlIf of f II A LgrouncICOV efatld OfIUtf Oo tgnfObe ancI 1 feQUICIrlY tpCIClICmd m canopy lo ongJOUl onIIl1Ofnu gfOUrod coveroncl orl lrtandmov Ream Ream i i I It Cllr 21 Walnut Street Setback ExtIIbIt582tI HaIr c Sectton 21 Page 5140 02299 e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Th Anaheim R ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 10 cONllt 011 uDI vnll ground cover and or furl j Panway loMOSCape 0 COl 01 clt notIr Ig Tall vefflcal trees ana smOll Of meou n canoPY trHS PlanIng on gtO 6 dmay of tuff and orgrounCJ COvel VM r M 11 rd Z t II I 0 i J I i I i i I I j t I DCItwOt I t I wt 1Ift JOlt 11 II 10 10 10 1 AncIINlm mcII IOOft cr CIw 22 Anaheim Boulevard Halter Street setback ExhibIt 5 82J Haf Cr SectIOn 22 AnatletnBouIevotrJ HaI1er Allellue 02300 POgtlS ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5eft OCk ape to c 01 IMoIDI vnesonct ground CO lum orIarqe conoov trees to De PIOI Itec l landacapea pork1lfOY e j m go conoovtJMI to De plantedI lg lO dSCOpecl IO lI f j I 81 n A 106ft 23 Ball Road We of We Place ExfIJbIt 5 82f H0If Croa SectIOn 23 101Rood W of W 02301 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 e e The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan vlneS to De PIOnleel on wa IOTIOnS V CIIe and QCceSllbI8 0 I i 11 lI i i IIlOC IplCIl latg OItalglOImg fl teet ot ptOp4Ifty to eomrn8ICkII i1 10 Other cIaI zen Anl IMIn u 28 InteriorProperty Une Setback Adjacent to Other Commercial Zones ExtIibIt 582k CI Sectbn 28 IntedorPtoperty Une Setback AdjOCent to 0 ComrnerclalZOfIM 02302 P0Q85 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e Slltoac t 1ClndIcac e 10C 01 trMs rvuCl OfOund covet Ql l JIOt turf P oemlQn IlCMwal i i i J I M w 0 J fljt e IlCIl 1 I21ff caw 280 w st PIac cul de sac ExhIOIt 5 8 2I HaIf StreetCr SecIlOn 28a Welt Place Cui de Sac 02303 e Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Re arl Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan V 1ll to tle CIlOnMCl ac2IOcenllo tpOcng UendeCllo CfeOle a VIUOlIC n wnenmolul LoncMeQI MICI area to CONII Of snrutd anaJOI gtOuna CoYef i i 2t 01 1 c l 11O 0IGnW I ftIlIIII McIII tlwn6 WCII a 9 wail bw Q marDei OCGMG at III L th di f r 5ld fco J 1 1 ill p tl t1Hf a It t f t 30 Interior Property line Setback Adjacent to Re ldentlal and MobIIehome U ExhibIt 5 82m HaIf S1reet C IIIs ctlOrl 3D 02304 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort pecmc Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan s toac lOnaICaoe CONIf Of IleaIV ItIIgrouna c andIer hII MnfrIQ CNIlgn 10 De ld ape e VenteOlpaln I I 00 A oulaflV SDQCIIO PICInmg OIemal ng Detw ngartll ancl DcIrnIJ thnItlIone grounc COV II UIIJ 1 ft 111 1011 1D n c n I 110 31 Conventton Way EJtttIII t 512rt HoIfStree Croa s cflOn 31 Con WIflOn Way 02305 e Poge5 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e The Anaheim Re orl PIn Section 5 0 Design Plan LonOIcOpe 10 ConAlf 01 II VuIawgrouno and orIU1 Potkwoy to Median pIOn tocONlI eonalf01 on ollmOlCanopyfr QlOl ItVutlL 0 M nJ NO A I I I Ifi i IIIII E I i I m wat l oJKae I A n lO I a 11 to CUIl d wor 17 or 32 Clementine Street ExhibIt 5 B 2 aJf street Cross SectIOn 32 Street 02308 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anohelm Resort Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan I I In rDOC to e 01 If P lCII W IeI ground C014 anGlOI f1Jrl Portwoy OIOnMO to e 01 medium orIOrge COtIOpy hHS PIonMg on grOIf lQ may InclUd Il IIYDI glouna C r i f i lpeto 01 arouncI Otrd Ol deIO ltoo 1I iIndIcaPe I h Ii 1 I 31ft r w or orto It c I 33 Welt S1reet South of Katella Avenue within Anaheim Resort ExhIlJ5 42P HaIf Sir C ca Section 33 west StrH SOuttl of KatelaA venue POQfl 5 48 02307 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e The Anaheim Relar Plan Section 5 0 Design P1CUl d 51 111I partwovs and m ClIon 10 eQNaIT Of CltemOfll lQ mcallreet and smCII Of medIUm canopy tr s On ground mov t1cllJoe ground cover and alturl setDOCk 10c 1 01 trelil lFlluD 1YIneI ground cover anafor 1 Pnvaf i m I I LancIICGPt hs tbOCl II ft 1 1 1 WI lIO WCIl I lIotoI A non 01 90 r I 20ft 10ft 718 t 34a Manchester Avenue West portion Exhibit 582q HofStreet Cross Section JAa t1H Avenue West Portion 02308 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Relort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan lon lIc 10 OOJ 01 trees srwuosvr Ies grOl6 d COYeI OfICJ orM1 W OnG m latllO conam 01 alternating rtleal tr QI lCI ImQl Of me m canopv tr J Kln on ounaInOy 0 rl ground co er anOIOllurl e 1 1 M1c f J I e L J r I It 12 JDft PI m 34b Manchester Avenue Portion South of Alro Way E1d1JbIt S 8 2r Hatf Str Cross Section 340 A Ponton South of AltO Way e POgfl5 ISO ---PAGE BREAK--- r e e The Anallelm Re ort S clIc Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Str I In 10 ClfY rnO lng rtlC t I Qna 0 0 m dlurnconopy Iree I iiiijl ItighltIfOY f I I j I PQl1lwov 6 mln no r by CaoO r v to 3O A ltgN ol1lOf IO IK 61 nW l c 35a ManchefterAvenue Po on Adjacent to Interstate 5 Right of Way North ofArlo Way EXhIbit S8b HaI Strt Cross SectlOn 350 AVfNlue Portion AcI OCBnt to Interstate 5 North of AI10 Way 02310 PageS ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re orl Plan Ir llr s In parkways10 cot llll ot OllernallnQ velflcor IIMS ond sma 01 lUm canopy Page 5152 f i J i j v Ma I Awrue light Of I2 tnr I Section 5 0 Design Plan I Ii Iii IrIN111a S lhgIltolloWGy i i i i i i LOllid capldparkway wtc Ifh att no V r gy Manchester Avenue Portion AdJacent to Intemate 5 of Way South of Katella Avenue ExhIDl 5 8 2t HaIf S CICMSection J5b Mancheler A VtHl Portion AdjOCenllo Inlerstate 5 South of KOfIllo AVlIn 35b 02311 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Th Anah lm R lort Speellle Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan VIne to De PIOnted on waM elilllohons VIIftlle ana ace SICIIla tn P1JDlIC j Vertleal to De adlOCenllo DtO rty Nsooclng 10 creole o I OIlCreftn wntn fTHS mat PIIYO e arn f i I 5dlactto be AnaM n heoft u 5 flgl ltlloWaW 36 Interior Setback Adjacent to Interstate 5 ExhibIt 5 82 CfOll s cllon 36 Intfl Of SeltxJek Ac1IOcent to In terstate 5 02312 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resorl Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e lavIIOIQndIrQOIIInIelCQC 1O eDna Of IfeeInNClI YlNIond c 1 0 medIurrI or ICIfQecOl lOOY trMI to DI pionIn rM Ilmutn CUI1 JUS wttI llOwtl Ow 1 1 I 0 i I e Pcwed SIdewoa c ncJ j jO r M3 lICIIWI J tt an 1ft wIdIh vantoft Anclihem u HaDof way12D It car HarbOr Boulevard North of Interstate 5 ExI1JI5 B2w H0If Str Croa Section 31 HotlXN Boulevard Norlfl o nfemate 5 37 02313 e POQe 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Relor Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan lQ on grounclmav I lclUde 01011 0 co OfICllor 11 111 1 AeClm 0 i L 1 J 1 I JDft g71i11 III II nil MIlt 10 ft ffD On lr9tWOOCl A 1IQNoway tOft MlICCI NWI ct c 39 OrangewOOd Avenue In the Anaheim Resort Ex lJbIt5 8 2x HaJI S rH CrOll Sectbn 39 OrangewOO 1 Avenue 02314 Pog 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim R or Plan if Section 5 0 Desfgn Plan Mtboct k to Conlin 01 b ubt grounQ COvel ana Of turf planting gn to IaV eeI J stt tf WI o median 0 c on Of c 1OMIy 1pOCec2 ventcOl f i i LanC IIcdpe s 1bOCIr Iteatn IlJVQ JF an 1ft trOY IcrneI JOftwM 71rt J N1Cfm to cen AnoI Mnheort W OItw oI wtItmayvary aNlI e ctIO OI 40 West Street Disneyland Drive north of Ball Road EJdlIbIt 5Bb HaIf 5ITHt c s ctton 40 west rneylanC1 DrIVe nor1tJ 0 So RooC1 Page lS6 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e Th Anall lm R ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Lanca apeIn s ttxx D f1Ql ldOwnlt i j oI 5 llJ I JDft 71ft Xlfl lluIIS lg PI 1QndIc0Qe to conallt 01 treel n ltll Metono gIOUI IC lcoYeI J MeaIum Ofbrge canaov to be pjt l lleG In OT 5 11M east Q 1n1tl1ltote5 SolIloe i 1il i 3 j J oQ Anaheftl u AoCId Of vadII 1 106 cr 41 Ball Road East of West Place ExtlIblt 5 8 20o HOIr S CrOll Section 41 80 Road EQ6 of West Place 02316 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan 10 ConIIT or trMJItI UbS Ground co anel o tuff 0eIlgn to 0 IQyefed lanaseape Peaestnan ItSeWOl J Stf t In partways ancI mecllon to co or onernotlng ltlCat Ir 1and smOll canopy e 1 PIoIOIC AIom tn mImay YGIY I i I e ftSel OCl Dr i 1 I I ft 5 WIdItlIO 56J Anc Iftem u olway 111 IIIIII 43 Freedman Way ExIIIbIt 5 8 2aD HaIf St t Croa SectIOn 43 F Hdman Way SOuttl SIde 01 Rlg 1t oI Way e 02317 poge 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim R lart Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Setback IQrIC2fCQDe 10 ConIlIf0 fleel stINes grounO cover onC3lor tutf o lgn 10 be overIan llcQ Pe IICMwal I I 3S oca 1011 u PuC Ic I j I T c 61t J I WIlII lto S1It Loca rtgI lt f wav MJ ct a s V 44a Local Street Alro Way Street Exhibit S 8 2ac HaIf Street Croa SectIOn 440 Local Street AfrO Way 02318 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Specific Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan SelDoc t IOnc2lCODe 10 cONll1 01 tr utl grou Covef oncI Of 1Ulf CMllOn 10 0 IQyerltC lOnc21cape oelhlOn sw s wa e J mal 0 me once tr as st tr Planlt lg on ground mov clUde glounCl Co r and Of lur 1 1 f i J e T J c J I 1 10 I II I lOft MIIIO 3D II Wt 20 AI IIl 1hMn IttlIOl fu Loca oOf wayeo r c a 44b Local street Casa Vista Street Exhibit 5 B 20a HaIf Str Croa Seclton 44Q LOCal Stree CQIO Vlrfa SIr e POQfl5I60 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan StbaCk IondICDPe 10 eCJn toflreM IhrubS C1 OUt ld cover oncI Ot turf aetlgn to be laYefed lanc2leape Pedestrian IIOeWOlk J mOl moo m canoov IT as Ilr rr Q l fcuna may InClUCle grounGl CO f OndJOll lrf I I i I T L J c J I 3t1 I I II I @ 10 WIIIlIl ID A onu LOCal woy 60tt ct ca er 44e Local Street Ox Road Exh Dlt 5 B 2t Half Str Cfoa Sectton 44 Locat Str ORoad 02320 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan sertxx k IClno eaoe 10 C0tlIII1 0 I MS huet ground cover and or full gIatIllng ae n lODe WQ M Sma ormedlulTl canoov TfH QI meet tr 1n weB PIli Ib rr I J co i if e K C b fj r C I e I t 1 I 3S @ lOft 2111 wtmto SSft 1yp l oCGl SlleefIligN ll war ct car 1 i 44d Local street Vermont Avenue Ex IIbI 82af 0If Str Cross Sectton UCI Verrnon Avenue 02321 e Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anohelm Re ort Pion Section 5 0 Design Plan Setback landlCaoe 0ConMt of n hUbs grouncl CO 4l ana Of turf pIOntng OMIgn toa layered 1on000aoe Sldewoll J 01 mo mcanopy tr OIIbH rr Plelnll lg on ground may inClude grouna co andJOIlurl 1 1 PubIC f i I 1 M Tj c 6ft 1 I I I f IO MIGJlI 10 10 LoCal lIghtoof wof J w ct CIIIJ r i r 44e Local Street Zeyn Street ExhIbII S 82aQ HaIf SIrt CfOI SectIOn 448 LocalStreet Z IStreet 02322 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re or Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan 5ettlOct lOndaCape 10 CONIIT ollf grOund cow e Conorr IIIOnCl Dale Palm In parkWays Oncl SUClolemenlorv medICn olanhl lg Of IOlge broaa ol 0 een S lruOS 1 i i I e lnSelbaCt I I ft iL L Tel 4ft nwcIan I ft 2Illlt 1Itt JOlt 11 Pacft O woy 110ft NDM oWO OJIIIypIcQICI l ICIm NWnlUDlKt to 1M OltM CIy 45 Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street Designated for Future Extension In General Plan Circulation Element e Exhibit S B 2ah H0It Strt Crass SectfOn 45 PacIfICa Avenue Between Harbor Boulevard and Hast Strt Page 5 764 ---PAGE BREAK--- 11Ie Anaheim RelOrt Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e e L 5 8 3 Plant Selection Matrix ThIs subsection Is Intended to assist In the selection of plant matertal to be used Within all three Realms ofthe Spe cific Plan area It contains two plant selection matrtces one for trees and another for shrubs ground covers and vines The plants l1sted In these matrices the planting design requirements contained In subsection 5 3 2 and Identify the specific plant mater1al that may be used to satisfy the landscape requirements deflned In the plans and cross sec tions contained In the Design Plan The Tree Selection Matrtx lExh1blt 5 8 4a divides the trees Into four subgroups small canopy trees medium canopy trees large canopy trees and vertical and pyramidal trees Secl10n 5 3 2 contains ofthese t 1 s1fIcations and generally describes the bastc uses for each type oftree For each species the matrtx contains detailed Information about the character of the tree Includtng mature height and spread evergreen or deciduous drought tolerance and normal rate of growth The matrtx also Ident1fles the preferred locations and how the tree shouldbe used Within the Publ1c Realm the matrtx specifies whether the tree should be used Within the Freeway Interchanges on the two major Central Core streets or on other streets The matrtx additionally 1nd1 cates the mIn1mum parkway width required for the partic ular tree based on the City scriteria the mIn1mum size for theindicated use and the maximum recommended separa tionbetween trees when planted In regular rows SImUarIy the matrtx ldent1fleswhere and howtrees shouldbe used In the Setback Realm and the approprtatenessofeach species for use In narrow 1020 feet medium 20 30 feet or wide 30 feet setbacks For the PrIvate Realm the matrtx Iden t1fles trees to be used for parking areas pool areas general landscaping or as focal points The Shrub SelecUon Matrtx ExhIbIt 5 8 4b foUows a sIm1 lar pattern by the recommended plants Into three groups shrubs vines and ground cover and then Indicattng the character of the plant and where and how It should be used to achieve the obJecttves of the Design Plan 02324 Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan POQfl5 166 For both matrices asoUd dot indicates that the particular plant has eIther the quality indicated In the case ofthe por tion of the matrix which describes the plants character or that the plant Is preferred for the desIgnation A hollow dot indicates that the plant IS acceptable for the indIcated use and the absence of adot generally means that the plant should not be used for the specUled situation WIthin the Prtvate Realm the matrix may be Interpreted more freely for example It Is acceptable for trees not Ident11led as focal points to be used as focal points If planted In larger sizes 48 box or larger The Intent Is to permIt somewhat more flexibility In the Prtvate Realm It Is also acceptable to occasIonally use plants not Usted In the matrices However plants from the matrices should at least 80 ofthe area to be landscaped and 80 oftotal Ust of plants to be used within each Realm LImIting the varietyofplants will strengthen the overall uni ty of the Anahelm Resort Subsequent to adoption of the landscape program for the Anahelm Resort PubUc Realm a distinctive plant and tree program will be selected for each of the streets within the Anahelm Resort ThIs planting program shall be subject to the review and approval of the CIty All plants and trees In the Setback and PrWate Realms sha1l be planted In con formance with the guidelines and standards Ident11led In this SpecUlc Plan In connection with the development ofIn dMdual properties 02325 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan e AnlIhelm Resort Specific Plen Tree Selection Metrix IIIIII If II II II III I t IIU U If nil I I i Wt II 0 GIM r c n II z 111II II r 1 1 CoO arAlMT c D r T eo v c e I 1 0 ar 02326 ExI IIbIt S S 30r Selection MatTIX Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Re ort Plan Section 5 0 Design Plan Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Shrub Selection Matrix AaII G It T T Tn r lo t I I I 1 L11 I III I I I I rhll i i u 1 II ilf 1 J x rrt r y Wi M1 T Cool fA T aw T Of Exhibit S B 3I ShruO Vine and Ground Covel Matrix Poge 5168 e e 02327 ---PAGE BREAK--- e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 1 General Community Objectives and Policies California Government Code 65450 65453 pennlt the adoption and administration of Specific Plans as an imple mentation tool for elements contained withtn the local Gen eral Plan Specific Plans must demonstrate consistency tn regulations guldeltnes and programs with the goals objec lives policies programs and uses Ihat are set forth tn the General Plan The Anaheim General Plan contains the Land Use Redevelopment Clrculallon Scenic Highways Envt ronmental Resource and Management tncludtng Conserva lion Open Space Parks Recreation and Community Services and Safety and Seismic Safety Houstng Noise and Growth Management Elements A General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Circulation and Environmen tal Resource and Management Elements Is being processed tn connection with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan tn or der to comprehensively plan for the enhancement of the Anaheim Resort The proposed amendment Is addressed tn General Plan Amendment No 333 and Is dJscussed tn detail tn Section 10 0 of this document This Specific Plan has been prepared tn conformance with the goals and policies of the General Plan Subsections 6 1 through 6 9 Include adJscusslon of the Specific Plan s conformance with the relevant goals and pol Icies ofeach ofthe applicable Elements ofthe General Plan This section describes the general community objectives and policies from the General Plan 6 1 1 General Community Objective 1 Malntatn and enhance the residential envtronment of Ana heim s IIvtng areas 6 1 1 1 Project Implementation Implementatlon of the Specific Plan wUl protect and en hance the surrounding residential uses through thefollow Ing means Deuelopment setback arfas willbe created and maintained wUl proulde an aesthetically appealing landscaped buffer between the Specific Plan properties and resldenttal areas All CoR District structures within 150 feet ofresldenttally zoned properties are required to haue a minimum buUcUng setback of two 2 times theheight of the buUdlng with aminimum 20foot wide landscaped area ad Jacent to the resldenttal property tne Also the height of structures wIthin 150feet ofa resIdential zone Is limited to 02329 Page 6 3 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency bACk5 IHS lho n t U rtme el Srh Sri jv h i w rE L1I1 rrJ md J J LI IC JD P 5iJbyd 0 t p yaJ I tJ 1iJ fletM cd f c ne N one half the distancefrom the building to the zone bound 6 1 2 General Community Objective 2 Maintain and enhance Anaheim as a regional cultural and employment center by diversifYing and enhancing the eco nomic base of the community 6 1 2 1 Projecflon Implementation The primary planning conceptfor this Spec flc Plan is to en hance this urban destination area and create aresort envi ronment By creating a destination resort wtth more attractions iodging and diningfacliities visitors wiil be en couraged to stayfor severai days or more and to eryoy the vartety of recreation and entertainment opportunities avail able within the Ctty ofAnaheim thereby enhancing the Clty s economic base 6 1 3 General Community Objective 3 Maintain and encourage Anaheim s position as anationally recognized tourist convention and recreation center 6 1 3 1 Project Implementation The Anaheim Resort Spec flc Plan recognizes the unique ness ofthe Anaheim Resort asafamily ortented tourist and convention destination center and encouragesfacliities ca tertng to tourist and convention related events while stiil complementing and protecting adjacent residential uses As proposed the Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan provides a long range comprehensive plan to create a cohesive unique resort identity to maintain and enhance existing recreation ortented land uses and to build upon the exist ing business opportunities to maximize the Anaheim Re sort s potenttal 6 1 4 General Community Objective 4 ProVIde all working living and recreation areas with a full range of communlty facilities and services 6 1 4 1 Project Implementation Another important Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan objective is to improve services and irifrastructure to accommodate the growth and development that will occur in the Speciflc Plan area The publicfacility components to be improved as a result of the Speciflc Plan are discussed in Secton 4 0 Public Facilttles Plan of this document Page 6 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resor Specific Plan 6 2 Land Use Element Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency ThJs section describes the portions ofthe Land Use Element of the General Plan apply to the Specific Plan 6 2 1 Commercial Areas Goals and Policies To meet the contlnuing needs and demands of the com munity for commercial goods and services at well designed safe and convenient localions within the community To increase sales tax yields and further enhance the eco nomic base of the community thereby lessening the tax burden on real property To maintain and enhance the position of the community as a nationally recognized tourist center 6 2 1 Polley Encourage and provide for the development of abroad range ofquality commercial facilities at appropriate loca tions throughout the community 6 2 1 2 The Anaheim Resort Spec flc Plan similar to the existing CoR Zone encourages the development oj toulist and con venton Ineludlng hotels restaurants and other visitor serving uses within the Anaheim Resort The Spec flc Planfurther providesfor an enhancement ofthe Anaheim Resort streetscape which together with enhanced development standards and design guidelines wtl create aunique resort Identty 6 21 3 Policy Encourage the grOuping of compUmentary commercial uses adjacent to arter1al and the total city Wide Inventory will reasonably relate to the size and char acter of the population to be served 6 21 4 Project Implementation The Anaheim Resort Spec flc Plan Implements thispolleY by grouping visitor serving commercial uses adjacent to arteri al highways Including Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue Ball Road DrIve Freedman Way Manchester Avenue Orangewood Avenue Convention Way and Anaheim Boulevard Haster Street 6 21 5 POlicy Encourage the development ofwell deSigned commercial areas througb the application of site development stan dards which provide for e e e 02331 Page 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency If e e Page 6 the compatible integration of conunercial uses when they are adjacent to residential and industrial areas and adequate off streei parking loading areas landscaping and other appropriate site improvements 6 2 1 6 Project Implementaflon The Anaheim Resort Plan includes zoning and de velopment standards design guidelines and a landscape streetscape program which are intended to enhance the Anaheim Resort and encourage high quality development The Specific Plan also includes provisionsjor landscape buffers between the Specific Plan area and residential land uses and adequate off street loading areas land scaping and other approprtate site improvements 6 2 1 7 Polley Provtde all conunercial developments with adequate and safe access to transportation facilities fire and police pro tection public utilities and other necessary conununlty servtces 6 2 1 8 Project Implementation Land uses within the Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan will be developed consistent with the Clrculatlon Element Envi ronmental Resources and Management Element which In cludes Sajety and Growth Manag JJ nt oj the CIty oj AnaheIm GeneralPlaj 1s will ensure that all de velopment In the AnaheIm Resort Specific Plan area wUl have adequate and saje access to all and services The Specific Plan In co lunct1fJn with the Environ mental Impact Report also providesjoradequatejlre and police prorectlon with the Anaheim Fire and Pollee Deport ments providing protectkm 00 The Fire andPo lleeDepartments will revtew FInal Site Plans and building plans and make recommendations 00 lnerease the ejJec tlveness oj their services Section 4 0 oj the Specific Plan provides a Public Plan which details all neces sary Improvements to water sanltalsewer sOOnn drain natural gas telecommunications and solid waste services 6 2 1 9 Poley Encourage the development of quality facilltles which complement conventions fam1ly entertalnment and rec reation within appropriate areas of the community ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 2 1 10 Project Implementation The Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan will accommodate uses which complement convention jamily entertainment and recreation through its list oj permitted and conditionally permitted uses In addition the Speciflc Plan provides de tailed design objectives and Implementation mechanisms such as extensive urban design and landscaping plans and detailed development regulations to ensure consistent ly high quality In and improvements 6 2 11 Polley Maintain the integrity of the Commercial Recreation Area now referred to as the Anaheim Resort by only compatible land uses within this designated area 6 2 112 Project Implementaflon The Speciflc Plan will maintain the Integrity qftheAnaheim Resort by providing a wide range oj attractions hotel ac commodations and restaurants which are compatible with each other In addition proposed pedestr1 m walkways and landscaped streetscape areas such as medians and parkways will establish a unifled resort Identity 6 2 13 Polley Evaluate the between the Downtown Area Redevelopment and the continued growth In the Commercial Recreation Area IncludJng both the Disney land Convention Center Area and the Anaheim Stadium Area to maintain the integrity of development trends 62 1 14 ProJecl Implementallan The architectural character and quality oj the buildings proposedjor areas vlsibleJrom publiC rights oJ way wLll be regulated through a combination oj deveiopment stan dards setJorth In Section 7 0 and design guidelines set jorth In Sectton 5 0oj the Spec flc Plan documentThe Ana heim Resort wLll be unique in that its primaryJocus isJor entertainment recreation and conventIon activities These standards and guidelines wLll encourage high quality de velopment and while different in nature will be compatible with proposed developments In the Downtown Area and the Anaheim Stadium Business Center Growth in each area will enhance the City s overal lmage as a regional commercial and recreation center 02333 Page 6 7 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resor Plan e e Page 6 8 Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 2 2 Community Services and Facilities Goals and POlicies 6 2 2 1 Goal Police To meet communIty needs for publlc safety and law en forcement by uillizing allocated resources for the preven tion detection and inveStigation of crime response to calls for service and maintenance of pedestrian and vehIc ular safety 6 2 2 2 Polley Assist in evaluation of land use proposals and develop ment patterns by proVIding input to the Planning Depart ment to assist in site plan reVIew and building analysIs and assessing land use trends and assumptions to deter mlne future needs 6 2 2 3 Project Implementation The Anaheim Pollee Department has been Involved In re vIewing theAnaheim Resort Spec flc Plan proposal and will also be Involved In the review of Final Slte Plans and buUd Ing plans The recommended mitigation measures are Iden t fled In the Environmental Impact Report The servIce needs ofthe Pollee Department has also been addressed In Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan document 6 2 3 Infrastructure Goals and Policies 6 2 3 1 Goa Water System To proVIde serVIce to the citizens ofAnaheim in the form of adequate pressure good quality and necessary quan tltles ofwater to meet both damestlc and tlre demands 6 2 3 2 Po8cy ProVIde for the efficient and economic of an adequate water supply and pressure to all residential commerc1al industrlal and pubUc areas served by the Municipal Water System 6 2 3 3 Project Implementation The Spec flc Plan area willbe serviced by theAnaheim Pub lic Utilities Department through the system wUl be mod fled as necessary to provide adequate quan tities and pressures to the Specifk Plan area 6 2 3 Goal System To provide ut1l1ty services adequate to enhance the health safety and general welfare of present and future cItizens of Anaheim ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specllic Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency Gl icl m cd i 0 2 3 5 Polley Serve electrical energy to all electrical consumers In Ana heim In a reliable and efficient manner which Is consis tent WIth good uttlity and business pracllces at rates WhiCh are equal to or lower than rates for comparable ser vices in adjacent communities 0 2 3 0 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan may result In an In creased demandfor power and the expansion of theInter state 5 as proposed by Caltrans will result In the elimination ofan exsting substation In connection with the Interstate 5 widenIng a new substation wtll be located ad Jacent to the AnaheIm Resort Specific Plan area at the northeast comerof Katella Avenue and Claudina Way and will supply the Anaheim Resort wIth the necessary electrt cal power e 0 2 3 7 Polley Encourage and provide for the Insta1lallon ofelectrical lines and cables and underground factlilles In a manner which enhances the aesthetic appearance of the commu nity 0 2 3 Project Implementation As part of a current City program the uttll ttes on Katella Avenue West StreettDisneyland Drive and Harbor Boulevard wtll be placed underground Any new power lines constructed to serve the Anaheim Resort wtll also be placed underground 6 23 9 Polley Operate and malntaJn City street lighting factlities for the safety and control of pedestrian and vehicular traffic 6 2 3 10 Project Implementation Street will be maintained for all streets and side walks within theAnaheim Resort Specific Plan The design of the system 1011I 1 leII flu n I Ill Hl oj theAnahetm Resort teIM 6 2 3 11 6oa nllary Sewer System PIC wr To provide adequately sized collector sewers to serve new developments In the City e 02335 Page 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specl1lc Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency e 6 3 Circulation Element e Page 6 10 t 6 2 3 12 Polley Monitor the existing sewer systems for impacts caused by changes In land use and liVing patterns and provide addi tional sewer capacity where necessary 6 2 3 13 Project Implementation The City qfAnaheim has prepared acomprehensive Master Plan oj Sewersjor the South Centrai Area aportion oj which Includes theAnaheim Resort Speciflc Plan area Re quired measures In Ihe Environmenta lmpact Report wtll provldejor adequate sewer capaclty The wastewater In Fountain Valley wtll ac commodate waste water generated In the Speciflc Plan ar ea The Orange County Sanitation may construct one or to provide reclaimed waterjor land scape Irrigation purposes 6 2 3 14 Goal Storm Drain System To provide aquallty service which will adequately protect and enhance thehealth safety andgeneral welfare ofthe present and future citizens of the City of Anaheim 6 2 3 15 Polley Provide a storm drainage system which will prevent dev astating flood damage and adequately dispose of rainfall and subsequent runoff from a ten year frequency storm 62 3 16 Project Implementation The City ojAnaheim has prepared acomprehensIve Master Plan oj Dralnagejor the South Central Area that examines dejlc enCles and Includes an Improvement plan encom passing theAnaheim Resort The study examined the ex storm drainage systems Anaheim Barber City Channe East Garden Grove Wlntersburg Channe and the West Anaheim Storm Drain proposed DISneyland Re sort and Anaheim Resort drainage Improvements at total buUd out conditions along with management techniques or programs Required measures In the Environ mental Impcu tReport wtll provtdejor adequate storm draIn capacIty ThIs secUon describes the porUons of the ClrculaUon Ele ment ofthe General Plan that apply to the Spedfic Plan 6 3 1 Goal and Policies PrOVIde a system of tra1 lc ways which Is related to the uJU mate need for moving people and goods and which will en ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency hance the appearance and quality of the residential and commercial areas through which they trave Provide abal anced transportation system which establishes mobility for all ages efficient and economic movement compatibility With the envtrorunenl and recognizes all avallable modes of transportation including yet not limited to the automobile mass transit and facilities to accommodate pedestrians equestrians and bicycles 6 3 1 Policy Classify all streets and highways in accordance With their function and the nature of the area which they are intend ed to serve The system ofarterial highways Will be related to the Orange County Master Plan ofArterial Highways and to the plans of adjacent cllles 6 3 1 2 Project Impiementaflon The Circulation Plan Is consistent with the results oj a traf flc study conducted in cO lunctlon with the Enuironmentai Impact Report preparedfor theAnaheim Resort Specific Plan The tra ffk study Included an eualuatlon of the pro posed circulation system modiflcatlons and their relation ship to the County Master Plan oj Arterial Highways The Public Plan Section 4 3 includes roadway cross sections which are consistent with the Clty s General Plan as amended per GPANo 33 A rs4 lll t rSP t JI the County s Master Plan oj Artertal Highways h bUR In rnnh nrH ro fl5l r 1 PI 1Il A d L uu 1 ot 1 1 rv lr R DI 1 Lv Je tIw l1f l ILL LUIUI ul lCa I FIJl 1 Bn e D 1 P I DA k1 6 3 1 3 Policy Design access onto major arter1al streets In an orderly and controlled manner Restr1ct heavy trafllc from enter ing the immediate of schools and other institu tions because of noise and safety factors 6 3 1 Project ImplemenlCl1lon Expanded roads and Intersections wlU be constructed In connection with The Disneyland Resort project to moue au tomobUes conuenlently off the 5 Freeway Intopublic park ingjacUltles The artertal and secondary system will be improued in connection with The Dtsneyland Resort and theAnaheim Resort Speciflc Plan projects to Increase Its ca pacity Circulation Improuements will be designed in a 02337 Page 6 11 i e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 11 mannerwhich discourages residential neighborhoods or negatively oJJecting schools or other in stitutions In addition the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan en courages shuttle bus services which will reduce bus tralflc aiong major arterials 6 3 15 POlicy Provide for the development of new transportation sys tems and modes 6 3 1 6 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan recognizes and provides jor masstransit to minimize automobile troJJic On local streets while moving large numbers ojpeople throughout the Anaheim Resort area The Orange County Transit Au thority OCTA provides local express dlal a ride and ride shartng bus services wIthIn the AnaheIm Resort as well as throughout Anaheim and the County In addition to public bus service a number oj Interstate buses private touring buses hotel and airport shuttle and taxts service the area 6 3 1 7 Polley A system of bicycle pedestrian hJk1ng and equestrian trails will be established which may be utilized for recre atlon as well as transportation uses 6 3 1 Project Implementation An extensivepec1estrtan circulation system will be con structed IncludIng pedestrtan overpasses In counction with The Disneyland Resort Speciflc Plan and sidewalks with landscaped parkways The General Plan does not designate any bicycle or equestrian trails within or aqJa cent to theAnaheim Resort Speciflc Plan area 6 3 1 9 Polley Redevelop existing circulation facU1t1es to meet present and future demand 6 3 1 10 ProjectImplementation Significant Improvements to existing local streets will be made to enhance the overall vehicular circulation within the Specific Plan area as dlscussed In thePublic FacUlties Plan e e poge6 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim ResortSpecific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 4 Environmental Resource and Management Element ThJs section describes the portions of the Environmental Resource and Management Element of the General Plan that apply to the Specific Plan e 6 4 1 Goal and Policy 1 Insure the efficient utilization and conservation of the City s naLural and man made resources to provide for the health safety and economic welfare of the citizens 6 4 1 Policy Encourage the retention of agricultural lands especially those In agricultural preserves for Its food and fibre and as valuable open space where economically feasible 6 4 1 2 Project Implementation There are approximately 56acres ojprivate land withinthe 5pecljic Plan CoR District which are utllizedfor agricultural purposes This acreage Is designated In the General Plan Land Use Elementfor Commercial Recreation land uses and In the Environmental Resource and Management ele ment as an agricultural preserve This land Is currently un der Williamson Act contract and has been noticedfor non renewal In connection with this Specljic Plan General Plan Amendment No 333 Is proposed to amend the Environ mental Resource and Management Element to take the ag ricultural preserve designation off of the property In recognition oj Its non renewal status Agricultural uses however will continue to be permitted in the Specljic Plan CoR District as weil as commercial recreation uses e 6 4 2 Goal and POlicy 2 Provide a full range of parks and recreational facilities and programs which are accessible to all residents 6 4 2 1 PoliCY Enhance the value of the City s Commercial Recreation Area and privately operated recreational facilities as avi able and valuable asset to the City s growtng recreational and leisure needs 6 4 2 Project Implementatton The Specljic Plan s objectives Include the transformation oj the Spec flc Plan area Into ajully Integrated destination re sort The Anaheim Resort wlll be enhanced through thepro vision of a wider range oj attractions hotel accommodations restaurants shopping opportunities and publtc spaces The Specific Plan proposes to expand the e 02339 Page 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency e 6 5 Safety and Seismic Safety Element e e Page 614 siZe and enhance the quality of streetscape areas land scape areas create an unique the area through landscape and signage and improve the irifrastructurefor the purpose oj increasing the enjoyment of the community and area visitors This sectton describes the portions of the Safety and Seis mic Safety Element of the General Plan that apply to the Specific Plan 6 5 1 Primary Safety Goal To provide for the preservation oflife and property by ensur Ing the most effective and economical use of all resources 6 5 2 Goal and Policies Fire Prevention Ensure the availability of adequate supplies of water and water pressure for sufficient frre flows 6 5 2 1 Polley Upgrade all water facilities as needed 6 5 2 2 The Anaheim Fire Department sets minimum standardsfor waterflow and will review the water improvement plans for each subsequent development to ensure the necessary facllitles are provided The Public Utllittes Department will ensure adequate supplies ofwater are provided 6 5 2 3 Polley Evaluate development proposals to ensure adequate wa ter supply 6 5 2 The waterfacillttes serving the Speciflc Plan area will be upgraded tD ensure that thepressures and nec essary to serve theAnaheim Resort wUI be provided as diS cussed In Section 4 6 oJ the Public Facllitles Pian 6 5 3 Goal and Policy Geologic Hazard e the risk to life and property through the Identl1l cation of hazardous areas establishment ofproper design cr1ter1a and provision for pubUc Infonnatlon 6 5 3 1 Policy Mitigate potential dJsaster through land use and develop ment standards ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 GeneralPlan Consistency 6 6 Housing Element 6 5 3 2 Project Implementaflon The environmental reviewfor the Specific Plan area has ex amined seismic hazards and has not identified anyfaulis or other serious geologic hazards within the Specific Plan area All physicai Improvements in the Specific Pian area will conform to City Codes in order to minimize potential di saster 6 5 4 Goal and Policy Flood Hazard the risk to Ufe and property through Identification of flood hazard areas 6 5 4 1 Polley Review and evaluate all development proposals located In areas which are subject to flooding 6 5 4 2 Project Implementation The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area is outside the 100 yearflood plain so the Impacts associated with potential flooding durtng a 1DOyear storm event are low The Storm Drainage System has been analyzed and Improvements will be required as discussed In the Public Plan 6 5 5 Goal and Policy Disasters the rtsk to Ufe and property through disaster pre paredness and public awareness 6 5 5 1 Policy Provide for streets to be used as the major source of evac uation 6 5 52 Major arterials In the Specific Plan area will be widened and otherwise Improved Increasing their efficiency and ca pacityfor use In evacuation Further mitigation measures such as requiring an emergency accessplan and the place ment ofemergency telephone serolce numbers In prominent locations are setforth In the Envtronmentallmpact Report This section the portions of the Housing Element ofthe General Plan that apply to the SpecUlc Plan 6 6 1 Goal and Policy Housing and Neighborhood Quality To prOvide Anaheim s residents with quallty housing and safe attractive neighborhoods 02341 Page 6 15 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency e 6 7 Noise Element e e Page 616 6 6 1 POlicy Safeguard the City s stable neighborhoods from intrusion by Incompatible uses or structures 6 6 1 2 Project Implementafion The Specific Plan implements the existing Commercial Rec reation General Plan designation Development standards and guidelines included in the Specific plan will require buffering ojAnaheimResort usesjrom adjacent residential areas through wider setbacks and required landscaping This section the portions of the Noise Element of the General Plan that apply to the Plan 6 7 1 Goals and Policies To protect those existing regions of the City for which noise envtronments are deemed acceptable and also those loca tions throughout the City deemed noise sensitive To encourage the reduction of noise from all sources such as motor vehicles industrial commercial activity aircraft operations home appliances and railroad movements 6 7 1 Polley The City shall develop acceptable noise standards consis tent with health and quallty of life goals and employ effec tive techniques of noise abatement through such means as anoise ordlnance bulld1ng code amendment and sub and zoning regulations 6 7 1 2 ProJect Implementation Uses within theAnaheim Resort Specific Plan area wtll be required tD conjorm wIth existing City ordinances relative tD noise The recommended measures are Iden t fled In the Environmental Impact Report 6 7 1 3 PoliCy Standards to regulate noise from construction activities shall be expanded and enforced Particular emphasis shall be placed on the restriction ofthe hours which other than emergency work may occur 6 7 1 4 Project Implementation Constructton activities wtll be required tD comply with the City ojAnaheim Sound Pressure LevelOrdinance which re noise levelsjrom constructton actlultles between 7 p m and 7 am All construction equipment shall be re ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency quired to be equipped with properly operating and main tained muiflers 6 7 15 POlicy Sound amplification equipment shall not be used within public spaces in prOximity to noise sensitive areas and or on streets and highways vjthin the City during the late night and early morning hours 6 7 16 Implementaflon No sound ampliflcatlon equipment shall be permitted with inpublic spaces in proximity to noise sensitive areas and or on streets and highways within the City during the late night and early morning hours Noise produced by said equipment shall be In coriformance with existing City ordi nances relative to noise 6 7 J 7 POlicy The nOise produced by power tools lawn mowers power edgers etc shall not Intrude upon adjacent residential spaces during the late evening night arid early morning hours 6 7 1 8 Project Implementaflon The noise produced by power tools lawn mowers power edgers eu shall not be allowed to Intrude upon adjacent resldenttal spaces during the late evening night and early morning hours and shall be In coriformance with existing City ordinances relative to noise 6 7 1 9 Polley When construCting new freeways mod1fy1ng freeway ramps or freeway access on oC way within the City the City shall encourage that preference be given to meth ods of deSign which reduce noise Impacts on adjacent lands 6 7 1 1 Q ProjectImplementallon The State oj California Department ofTransportatton lCAL TRANS is the destgn ojjreeway Improve ments Including widening oj the 1 5 Freeway and constructton ojon and offramps within the Anaheim Re sort City have provided Input to Caltrans on the 1 5 widening relattve to noise issues 6 7 1 11 Polley Employment ofnoise mJtigation measures In the design of all future streets and highways and ofbuff 02343 Page 617 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e 6 8 Growth Management Element e e Page 6 18 Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency ers between the arterials and adjoining noise sensitive ar eas 6 7 12 Project Implementation The Plan providesfor landscaped buffers along the major arterials to reduce noise Impacts on surrounding ar eas The Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Report dls cusses impacts associated with the Anaheim Resort Plan The recommended mitigation measures are In the Environmental Impact Report 6 7 13 Polley Where appropriate sound walls berms and landscaping along existing and future highways and ra1lroad rights of way to beautify the landscape and reduce noise shall be required 6 7 14 Road Improvements In the Plan area wtl utilize ex tensive landscaped buffers which wlU reduce noise and beautify the landscape No ralroad oJ J1Jay Is located within the Plan area This section describes the portions of the Growth Manage ment Element of the General Plan that apply to the Specific Plan 6 8 1 Growth Management Goals and Policies for Land Use 6 8 1 Goal ProVide a full range of land uses In the City to meet the physical social and fiscal needs necessary to the well be Ing ofex1Sting and future citizens 6 8 1 2 Policy Direct growth and change to those areas ofthe Citywhere system capadties can accolDIIlodate additional demand or where these systems can be readlly Improved 6 8 1 3 The AnaheIm Resort Speciflc Plan area Is located In the AnaheIm Resort which the City ofAnaheIm has Identified In Its EconomIc Development Strategic Plan adopted In 1990 as apriority growth area There wIIbe Infrastructure Improvements to upgrade the existing system capacIties as and discussed In Section 4 0Publlc Facllties Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General plan Consistency 6 8 1 4 Policy Assure a balance of commercial industrial and residen tialland uses in order to retain Ienhance the economic base of the City 6 8 1 5 Project Implementation The City oj Anaheim General Plan providesjor a baiance oj commercial industriai and residential land uses with the City The Speciflc Plan area is designatedjor Commercial Recreation land uses e 6 8 1 6 POlicy Design or redesign commercial and industrial areas to prOVIde recreational opportunities for workers in both public and private recreational facilities as well as parks for passive recreation open space 6 8 17 The Speciflc Plan includes pedestrian walkways and al lows entertalnmentjacllities subject to the approval oja conditional use permit Thosejacilltles will be available to workers within the surrounding area as well as visitors andl or area residents The provision oj parks with In the vicinity qf the Anaheim Resort is discussed in the Parks Recreation and Community Services Element oj the General Plan U 1 8 Goal Strive to establish development priorities citywide 6 8 1 9 Policy Identify and encourage development of vacant and un derutll1zed lands where services are available or can be accommodated 6 8 1 10 Project Implementation The economic Development Strategic Plan adopted In 1990 has ldentiJled theAnaheim Resortincluding theAna heim Resort Speciflc Plan area as apr1or1ty growth areaJor the economic development oj the City The Speciflc Plan area Includes vacant and parcels The Public FacUlties Plan setsJorth the trifrastructure and service 1m provements necessary to accommodate thefuture growth In the area 6 8 1 11 Policy Employ strategies within urban growth boundaries such as public Infrastructure investment to promote inIlll and e e 02345 Page 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency rehabllitation of existing properties and to foster permJt ted development consistent with the protection of quality of life within existing communities 6 8 1 12 Project Implementoflon Implementatton of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan wiIl en hance the Anaheim Resort I fill and rehabilitation ofprop erties are encouraged within the Specific Plan area The area wide irifrastructure and service improuements neces sary to accommodate thefuturegrowth in the area are ad dressed in Section 4 0 Public FaciIlties Plan and EIR No 313 e 6 8 13 Goal Develop land use strategies incentives to reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled 6 8 14 Polley Encourage new pedestrian oriented development that provides arange of services and amenities to reduce auto use during non commute times 6 8 15 Project Implementaflon The AnaheIm Resort Specific Plan encourages a uariety qf pedestrian ortented ulsitor serving uses includIng restau rants and hotels wIth accessory retail uses within walking dlslance qf the AnaheIm Conuentlon Center and the exist ing and planned theme parks all ofwhich are proposed to beconnected by landscaped parkways and sidewalks To gether with the landscaped promenades and connectIons wIth theproposed theme park entry areas andpubltc park IngfacUlties In connectton wIth The Disneyland Resort Spec flc Plan these pedestrian ortented uses amen itIes wlU allow ulsltors to reduce theirauto use during the d11y 6 8 16 Policy Support the development of diverse types of public and prtvate transit services within urban areas to facllitate travel particularly the home to work commute 6 1 17 Project Imp mentatton The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan recognizes andprouldes forpublic transit services The Orange County Transit Authority acrAl prouldes local express d al a rtde and rtdesharing bus services wUhIn the AnaheIm Re sort as well as throughout Anaheim and the County In ad e e Page 6 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 GeneralPlan Consistency dition to public bus service a number oj interstate buses private touring buses hotel and airport shuttie and taxi serolces service the area 6 8 18 Policy Encourage new development to provide commercial sup port opportunities for employment centers such as locat ing restaurants near and or in employment centers or providing shuttle service to shopping areas 6 8 1 19 An Important objective oj theAnaheim Resort Speciflc Plan is to supply the visitorjacillties that will be needed to meet the long term demandjor recreation convention and resort Many oj these same visltor can aiso be utilized by employees who work in the Anaheim Re sort An extensive pedestrian oriented environment and shuttle service will also help to implement this polley 6 8 2 Growth Management Goals and Policies for Community Services and Facilities 6 8 2 1 Pollee Goal To adequately assess the impacts of proposed develop ment and or intens1ficatlon of existing land uses and strive to achieve agoal of 1 45 to 1 7 sworn officers per thousand population an emergency response time of 3 mJnutes and anon emergency response time of 20 mJn utes 6 8 2 2 Policy Provide mandatoryreview of all new actions prior to their approval to ensure that impacts to the Pollee Department are identified and appropriate mitigation measures of approval are incorporated in cluding phasing of the measure 6 8 2 3 Prolect Implementation The Speciflc Plan Pubilc Faciltties Plan Section in conJunc tion with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Re port discusses Impacts Implementation ojthe Speciflc Plan wilt have on the Pollee Department The recommended mit Igation measures are ldentifled In the Environmental Im pact Report Page 6 21 02347 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort pectfic Plan Section 6 0 General plan Consistency 6 8 2 4 Goal Fire e To adequately assess the impacts of proposed develop ment and or intensification of existing land uses toward achieving a goal of providing a maximum five minute engine company re sponse to 90 of all incidents and a maximum of 8 minute response to the remaining 10 ofall incidents for both fire and paramedic service providing amaximum 10 minute truck company re sponse to 90 of all incidents for both fire and paramedic service providing aminimum 15 minute truck company reo sponse to 90 of all hazardous material emergencies and a30 minute response to the remaining 10 of dents 6 8 2 5 Polley Review all new discretionary and nondiscretionary ac tions pr10r to their approval to ensure that impacts to the Fire Department are Identified and appropr1ate mitigation measuresIconditions of approval are Incorporated 6 8 2 6 P The Specific Plan Public FacUlties Plan Section In cO lunc tlon with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Re port discusses Impacts Implementation ofthe Specific Plan wUI halle on the Fire Department The recommended mitl gation measuresare In the EnvironmentalImpact Report 6 8 2 7 Goal Schools Assist the School In their long range planning ef forts by facilitating their review of planning and develop ment proposals Including General Plan Amendments zoning reclassifications annexations and redevelopment proposals servingthe planning area and to cooperate With the school In their planning to provide school fa cUlties to meet the needs of the community In atimely manner e 6 8 2 8 Polley Continue the practice oflevying school Impact fees on de velopment as prescribed by AB 2926 e Page 6 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 GeneraZ PZan Consistency 6 8 2 9 Implementation Development pursuant to theAnaheim Resort Specific Plan will be subject to a schoollmpactjee as discussed In the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Environmental Impact Re port 6 8 3 Growth Management Goals and Policies lor Infrastructure 6 8 3 1 GaolWater To adequately assess the impacts of proposed develop ment and or intensification of existing land uses and pro pose mitigation measures to assure adequate levels of servtce and Infrastructure are proVided 6 8 3 2 Polley Continue to reView plans and permits to assure that de velopments proVide their fair share of water servtce and costs to serve their proJects 6 8 3 3 Project Implementation The Specific Plan Public Facilities Plan Section In conjunc tion with the Anaheim Resort EnvIronmental Impact Re port discusses Impacts Implementation Ifthe Specific Plan will have on the City S water system supply The recom mended measures which Include the watersys tem Improvements listed In Secton 4 6 assure that an adequate supply oj water will ex Stjor the growth envi sioned In the Specific Plan 6 8 3 4 Goal To assure that water sources remain pure that there Is ample supply and distribution through more eIDclent use of water storage conservation use oCreclaimed water and acquisItion of additional facilitles 6 8 3 5 PolICy Implement water conservation programs and techniques in accordance with the Best Management Practices MOU to reduce the use ofwater to the most effective extent pos sIble 6 8 3 6 I ro eCt Implementation Water conseroatlon will be Implemented In accordance with the City S adopted Landscape Water EffiCIency OrdI nance The Public Facilities Plan Section 4 7 lists some oj thewater conservatIon measures that will be Implemented within the Specific Plan area Water conservaton Is also e e Page 6 23 e ---PAGE BREAK--- 4h The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency discussed In the Anaheim Resort EnvironmentalImpact Re port 6 8 3 7 Polley RecogniZe that water is a natural resource that needs to be protected through the Best Management Practices MOU and other techniques 6 8 3 8 Project Implementation Water conservation will be Implemented In accordance with the Clty s adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Ordi nance The Publlc Facilities Plan Section 4 7 lists some oj the waterconservation measures that will be Implemented within the Specific Plan area 6 8 3 9 Polley Develop techniques to increasewater storage and capture such as capturing rain runoff and utilizing reclaimed wa ter where appropriate 6 8 3 10 Project Implementation The Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Report discuss es techniques to Increase water storage and capture and Identifies recommended mitigation measures 6 8 3 11 To adequately assess the Impacts of proposed develop ment and or intensification land uses and pro pose mitigation measures to assure that adequate levels of service and Infrastructure are provided 6 8 3 12 Polley Continue to revtew plans and permits to assure that de velopments provide their fair share of electrical require ments to serve theirprojects and Implement conservation measures 6 1 3 13 PrOject Imple nlallon The Speciflc Plan Public Facilities Plan Sectlon In conJunc tion with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Re port discusses Impacts Implementation oj the Specific Plan will have on the electJ1caIjacUltleS The recommended mit Igation measures are Identified In the Environmental Im pact Report to assure that electJ1cal requirements are met and that approprtate conseroatlon measures are Imple mented 6 8 3 14 POliCY Implement the conversion program e e Page 6 24 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 8 3 15 The Speciflc Plan requires all new llnes constructed to serve development In the Anaheim Resort Speciflc Plan area to be placed underground 6 8 3 16 Goal Sanitary Sewer System To adequately assess the impacts of proposed develop ment and or intensification of existing land uses and pro pose measures to assure that adequate levels of service and infrastructure are provided 6 8 3 17 PollcV Continue to review plans and permits to assure that de velopments provide their fair share of sanitary sewer sys tem requirements to serve their projects Require capacity studies be performed by the developer applicant If deemed necessary by the Public Works Engineering De partment 6 8 3 18 The Speciflc Plan Publlc Plan Section In conJunc tion with theAnaheim Resort Environmental Impact Re port discusses Impacts implementation qfthe Speciflc Plan wUl have on the sanitary sewer system The recommended mitigation measures are Identt fled in the Environmental Impact Report 6 8 3 19 Pallcv Continue to collect and implement sewer assessment area fees as approprtate 6 8 3 20 Project Implemenlallon The AnaheIm ResortSpeciflc Plan will require development to provide theirproportionate share offeesfor sewer sys tem Improvements 6 3 21 Goal Slarm Drain Svstem Ta adequately assess the impacts of proposed develop ment and or intensification ofexisting land uses and pro pose mitigation measures to assure that adequate levels of service and Infrastructure are provided 6 3 22 PollcV Continue to review plans and permits to assure that de velopments provide their fairshare ofstorm drain require ments to serve their projects Page 625 02351 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General jlan Consistency e e Page 6 26 6 8 3 23 Project Implementation The Specific Plan Public FaclIlties Plan Section in conjunc tion with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Re port discusses impacts Implementation oj the Specific Plan will have on the storm drainjaclIlties The recommended mitigation measures are identified in the Environmental Impact Report 6 8 3 24 Goal flood Control To adequately assess the impacts of proposed develop ment and or of exiSting land uses and pro pose mitigation measures to assure that adequate levels of service are provided 6 8 3 25 Polley Implement the recommendations In the Master Plan for Drainage 6 8 3 26 Project Implementation The recommended mitigation measuresjor stonn drainage and compliance with the Master Planjor Drainage are dis cussed in the Environmental Impact Report 6 8 3 27 Polley Continue to review plans and to assure that de velopments provide their fair share of flood control re quirements 6 8 3 28 Project Implementation The Specific Plan Public FaclIlties Plan Section In conjunc tion with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Re port discusses Impacts Implementation ojthe Specific Plan will have on theflood controljacUltles The recommended measures are In the Environmental Impact Report 6 8 4 Growth Management Goals and Policies for Circulation 6 8 4 1 Goal To reduce traffic congestion on the City of Anaheim con trolled arterial highway system 6 8 4 2 Polley Continue to Implement the Critical Intersection Program 6 8 4 3 Project Implementation The Circulatton Plan oj the Spec flc Plan accommodates the required widening oj Clty destgnated Intersections wIthin the Specific Plan area ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 8 4 4 Polley Continue to promote traffic reduction strategies through incentives and site design criteria such as bicycle usage carpools pedestrian circulation and other TDM mea sures e 6 84 5 Project Implementation The City will Implement and monItor a comprehensiue Transportation Demand Management TOM program with participating employers which carpooling uanpooling transit passes commuter busses shuttle ser ulce bIcycling aguaranteed ride home program work schedule adjustments workfacillty management and Transportation Management AssocIation TMA services 6 8 4 6 Polley Use the Citywide transportation model to develop im provement phasing plans 6 8 4 7 The traJ lc study preparedfor the EnulronmentalImpact Reportfor the Anaheim Resort Specific Pian wasprepared In cor functlon with the citywide transportatIon model 6 8 4 8 Polley Continue to maintain consistency between the City S and Countys Master Plan of Arterial Highways 6 8 4 9 Project Implemenlallon The Circulation Planfor theAnaheim Resort Specific Pian ts consistent with the City s General Plan Circulation Element aSM ei 4U as amended per GPANo 33 A 86 far SM Pld RilRt r 011 the County s Master Plan ofMertal Highways l u 1 I7 Rr 1 rq r1191 R 1lLa h 881 I In n n B ifJ RR 1 the MnC t r DJI la ritr Jt JM H Bl lfk the n HI IIJ I J A or BS1 e 6 4 10 Policy Promote and implement publlc transportallon and alter nallve modes oftransportallon such as increasing access to publlc transit through land use design locating higher unit residenUal projects near transportallon corridors provide direct and convenient pedestrian access from the Interior of development to publlc transit stops develop ment and promollon of bicycle trails encouraging pedes Page 6 27 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency trian friendly developments support development of High Occupancy Vehicle HOVJ lanes etc 6 8 4 11 Project Implementation An essential part oj the Anaheim Resort Specific Pian is to promote improvements to the transportation system so that access to the Anaheim Resort will be convenient and pleas ant The Specific Plan providesJor arterial Improvements coordinated with the 1 5 widening and interchange Im provements In addition the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan includes a variety oj uses In one location connected by an Inviting integrated pedestrian environment 6 8 4 12 Polley Prior to the Issuance of building permits for new devel opment forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour morning or evening trlp ends trafllc Impact analyses are to be completed to Identify arterial and intersection im provements needed to provide not worse than LOS E along Interstates State Routes Superstteets unless CUf rent operation Is LOS Fl and not worse than LOS D along the balance of the arterials on the Citys Circulation Ele ment that are measurably Impacted by the new develop ment and are under the City s Jurisdiction Developments that are under the Citys Jurisdiction are required to provide Improvements or provide funding for needed improvements to provide not worse than the above referenced LOS WIth existing plus development tra1llc Large scale development projects In the City may Involve complex coordination between the d11ferent phas es of development of the project and the phasing of the necessary improvements to roadway capacities needed for theproject Thus new large scale development projects In the City shall be required to estabUsb an approved devel opment phasing program Phasing Program which phases development of the project commensurale WIth the required improvements to roadway capacities The Phasing Program shall Include an overall buildout plan which can demonstrate the ability ofthe Infrastructure to support the planned development and financing mecha nisms to fund the improvements WIth the developer pay Ing Its fair share of the costs of the improvements Projects which are not subject to the Phasing Program shaJIlmplement improvements WIthin three years of e e e ee Page 628 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency building permit issuance or up to five years from first grading pennit for each approved phase of the project With bonding to ensure the developer s fair share partici patlon e Intersections exempt intersections that can have an un acceptable LOS from the above paragraph include facill ties under thejurisdiction of another City or the State or those included on the Deficient Intersection List estab lished pursuant to the Growth Management Element thJs Deficient Intersection Lisl wasdetermined by members of the Inter Planning Forums Deficient in tersections are those intersections that are not brought into compliance in the most current CIP for reasons be yond the control of the local i e intersec tions such as those involving ramps leading to or from the freeways The intersections ident1 led on Figure 2 of the Growth Management Element are under the control of another City the County or State therefore the City of Anaheim Is not held responsible for bringing these inter sections to an acceptable LOS Locations outside of the City s Jurisdiction shall be discussed through the Growth Management Area inter Jurisdictional Planning Forums to effect mutually satisfactory mitigation of traffic impacts forecast With individual development 6 8 4 13 ProjectImplementation Section 4 0 Publtc Facilities Plan In conjunction with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Report discusses Impacts Implementatton oj the Spec flc Plan will have on the Circulation System The recommended mea sures to achieve the required LOS are ldent fled In the En vironmental Impact Report 6 U l Goal To adequately assess the Impacts ofproposed develop ment and or intens1 lcatlon of existing land uses and pro pose mitigation measures to provide adequate levels of service and infrastructure 6 1 15 Polley Continue to review plans and permits to assure that de velopments provide their fair share of transportationfees Improvements to their impact e Page 6 29 e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 8 4 16 Project Implementoflon Section 4 0 Public Facilities Plan In coryunction with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Report discusses impacts implementation of the Specijic Plan will have on the transportation system The recommended mitigation measures which will assure thedevelopment sfair share of transportationfees Iimprovements aremet are identijied in the Environmental Impact Report 6 8 4 17 Polley Require that all new development shall pay Its share of the transportation Improvement costs associated with that development including traffic mitigation affecting neighboring cities through the inter Jurisdictional Plan ning Forum process 6 8 4 18 Section 4 0 Public Facilttles Plan In coryunction with the Anaheim Resort Envtronmentallmpact Report discusses Impacts implementation of the Specijic Plan will have on the transportation system Mitigation measureswill assure the projects share oftransportation improvement costs are met 6 8 4 19 Polley That the Cityof Anaheim shall collect atransportation im provement fee for Improvements Its boundaries and work with other through Inter lIona Planning Forums to determine accept able Impact fee levels for appl1callon the GMAs 6 1 4 20 Project Imp ntatton Sectton 4 0 Public FacUitles Plan in coryunctton with the Anaheim Resort Envtronmentallmpact Report discusses tmpacts Implementatton of the Spec flc Plan wUI have on the Clrculatton System 6 1 421 Policy That development shall be phased and phasing programs for specl1lc large scale prOjects shall be approved in accor dance with any appl1cable Comprehensive Phasing Pro gram CPP adopted by the City CPPs shall include development phasing plans which establish both aphas ing allocation of development commensurate with road waycapacities and an overall build outdevelopment plan which can be supported by Implementation ofthe planned circulation system e e e Page 630 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 8 4 22 The Specific Plan Public Plan Section in conjunc tlon with the Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Re port discusses Impacts Implementation ofthe Specific Pian wtlt have on the Circulation System 6 8 4 23 Policy All new development shall pay its fair share of the costs associated WIth cumulatively needed tramc improve ments programs This shall be accomplished WIth collec tion of a CItywide transportation Improvement fee that meets or exceeds the minimally acceptable fee levels Iden tUled through the Growth Management Area Inter Jurls Planning Forums New Measure M sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private developer fundIng which has been conunltted for any project or nor mal obligations and shall be applied towards maintenance and or correction of exiSting LOS deficien cies 6 8 4 24 The Specific Plan Public Plan SectIon In coryunc tlon with the AnaheIm Resort Envtronmentallmpact Re port dtscusses Impacts Implementatton ofthe Specific Plan will have on the transportatton system The recommended measures addressIng the poyment or construc tIon oftransportatton Improvements are Identified In the Environmental Impact Report 6 8 5 Growth Management Goal and Policy for Parks and Open Space 6 5 1 Goal To adequately assess theImpact of proposed development andIor Intensification of exiSting land uses and propose mitigation measures to assure that adequate levels of ser vice are provided and that the goal of a mInimum of two acres ofparks per thousand population Isrequired of new developments 6 52 Policy Continue to review plans and permits to assure that de velopments provtde their fair share contribution to park facWtles 6 8 5 3 The Parks RecreatJon and Community Services Elementof the General Plan dtscusses the ofparle and Page 631 02357 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 6 0 General plan Consistency e community service within the vicinity oj the Ana heim Resort As this project does not Include the construc tion oj residential structures noparkJees are required As further discussed In the Anaheim Resort Environmental Im pact Report this project does not result In Impacts to the parks system 6 8 6 Growth Management Goal and Policies for Air Quality 6 8 6 1 Goal To adequately assess the lrnpacts of proposed develop ment and or intensification ofexisting land uses and pro pose mitigation measures to assure that SCAQMD air quality standards are achieved the greatest reduction possible In vehicle miles traveled Is achieved and that land uses are proportionately balanced 6 8 6 2 Policy Continue to require ali developments to comply with the requirements of the AIr Quality Management Plan 6 8 6 3 ProjectImplementation The Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Report discuss es Impacts Implementation the Spec flc Plan may have on air qualtty The recommended mitigation measures are Identified In the Environmental Impact Report 6 8 6 4 Policy Continue to reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled through the implementation of transportation demand management TDM programs the City recently adopted TDM Ordinance 115209 and other programs destgned to promote trip reductions Increase vehicleoccupancy ratio etc 6 8 6 5 PToject Implemenlallon The City wUI Implement and monitor a comprehensIve Transportation Demand Management TDM program wtth participating employers which wUI Include catpoollng vanpooltng transit passes commuter busses shuttle ser vice bicycling aguaranteed rtde home program work schedule adjustments workfacUlty management and Transportation Management Association TMA services e Page 6 32 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Plan Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency Policy 6 9 Parks Recreation and Community Services 6 8 6 6 e Pursue methods to reduce vehicle miles traveled through non regulatory and voluntary market based mcentive ef forts 6 8 6 7 Project Implementation The City will implement and monitor a comprehensive Transportatton Demand Management TOM program with employers which will include carpooling vanpoollng transit passes commuter busses shuttle ser vice bicycling aguaranteed ride home program work schedule adjustments workJacillty management and Transportation Management Association TMA services 6 8 6 8 Policy Strive to achieve compliance with applicable Federal and State standards for air quality 6 8 6 9 Project Implementation The Anaheim Resort Environmental Impact Report discuss es Impacts Implementation oJthe Spec flc Plan will have on air quality The Spec flc Plan will require that IndIvidual de velopment projects strive to achieve compliance with appli cable Federal State standards This section describes the portion of the Parks Recreation and Community Services Element ofthe General Plan that apply to the Specific Plan 6 9 1 Goal and Policies 1 Provide for sufficient mdoor and outdoor park recreation and community service opportunities throughout Anaheim to meet the needs of existing and future residents and work ers 6 9 1 1 PolicY Encourage the development of park and community ser vice facWUes within areas of relatively high employment concentrations that wtII serve the needs both of local workers and nearby resldents 6 9 1 2 PtoJKt Implementatton The Parks Recreatton and Community Services Elementoj the General Plan discusses the auaUabUlty ojpark and community within the viCinity oj the Ana helm Resort e Page 6 33 e ---PAGE BREAK--- r The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan e e an C St 5 mtfT 1 1li t fi 1 I JJ liUt II J m a rJ e Page 634 Section 6 0 General Plan Consistency 6 9 2 Goal and Policies 2 Maintain and Improve Anaheim S overall visual appeal by way of continued development and maintenance of medi ans parkways and street trees throughout the City 6 9 2 1 Polley Develop continuously maintain and rehabilitate when necessary cost effective aesthetically pleasing and uni fonnly designed landscaped parkways and medians with out compromising other park recreation and community services programs 6 9 2 2 projeet Implementation One of the desIgn conceptsfor the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ts to transform and unify the Anaheim Resort area with landscape The prtmary component qf thts transfor mation will be the streetscape which will Include trees and shrubs as well as man made elements such as tures benches monuments and signs SpecIally desIgned landscapedparkways and medians are an Integralpartof the Specific Plan All landscaping In the AnaheIm Resort Speciflc Plan ts required to be maIntained In a neat and or derly manner In the City anticipates that It will alntenance 1 Including all parcels within the Anaheim Resort 6 9 2 3 Polley Replace trees when removed with proper aesthetically pleasing easily maintained and safe tree species consis tent with an adopted Master Plan of Trees 6 92 Project Implemenlalton All trees within the Speciflc Plan area will beplanted In ac cordance wIth the approved plant palettefound In Sectlon 5 0 Design Plan ofthis document SectIon 7 0 Zoning aru J Development Standards ofthis document requires the replacement ofdead or diseased treesfrom the same plant palette within the Speciflc Plan area ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Speclnc Plan Section 7 0 Zoning Development Standards 02361 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 7 0 Zoning Development Standards CHAPTER 18 48 SPECIFIC PLAN NO 92 2 SP92 2 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTIONS 18 48 010 18 48 020 18 48 030 18 48 040 e 18 48 050 18 48 060 18 48 070 18 48 080 18 48 090 18 48 100 18 48 110 18 48 120 18 48 130 18 48 140 18 48 150 18 48 160 18 48 170 18 48 180 18 48 190 PURPOSE AND INTENT GENERAL PROVISIONS DEFINITIONS METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPMENT AREAS LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSDEVELOPMENT INTENSITY AREAS LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMERCIAL RECREATION C R DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSPUBLIC RECREATION PR DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AREA 2 MOBILEHOME OVERLAY CENTRAL CORE OFF STREET PARKING LOADING REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS FOR VACATION OWNERSHIP RESORTS SIGN REGULATIONS APPLICATION FEES DEDICATION IMPROVEMENTS RECLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE VIOLATION PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS AMENDMENTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES NONAPPLICABILITY PARK MHP AND AND 18 48 010 PURPOSE AND INTENT 010 Purpoee The regulations set forth In this Chapter have been established to provide for orderly development of and upon adoption of an ordinance reclassifying sald property to SP 92 2 the Zone shall be applicable to that certain property here Inafter referred to as the Specl1lc Plan area described In that Spec1fic Plan No 92 2 doc ument hereinafter referred to as the Specif Ic Plan marked Exhibit A and on lie In e 18 48 010 PURPOSE AND INTENT the Office of the City Clerk approved by the City Council on as the same may be hereinafter amended 020 Intent The Anaheim Resort Spe cific Plan Zone recognizes the uniqueness of the Anaheim Resort as a family oriented tourist destination and encourages facilities catering to tourist and convention related events This zone is intended to provide for and encourage the development of integrat ed facilities in attractive settings for retaJI businesses directly related to entertaining lodging and supplying servlces to tourists and visitors This Zone Is further intended to preserve locally recognized values of communIty ap pearance to safeguard and enhance proper ty values in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone to protect public inveslment in and the character of public thoroughfares and to ald in the attractlon of tourists and other visitors important to the economy of the City Application of these regula uons Is specif ically intended to provide for the most appro priate use of the land create a harmonious relationship among land uses and protect the health safety and welfare ofthe commu nity 030 Organization In accordance WIth the provisions of Chapter 18 93 of the Anaheim Municipal Code entitled SPECIF 1c PLANS the standards herein are pat terned after the zone districts and definitions contained In Title 18 ZONING of the Ana heim Municipal Code 18 48 020 GENERAL PROVISIONS 010 Compliece With Anaheim Re sort Specific Pie Code All uses and de velopment In this Zone shall comply WIth any applicable provisions of the Code ex pressly referred to In thls Chapter includ Ing unless specl1lcally amended herein the provisions of Chapters 18 01 entitled DEF INITIONS ZONING CODE and 18 04 enti tled SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL of this Code provided however that In the event of any or inconsis tency between any provision contained In any other Chapter of this Code and any pro vision contained In this Chapter the provi sion contained In this Chapter shall govern and apply All Engineering Standards re ferred to In this Chapter are on lie In the Of fice of the City Engineer and are Incorporated herein by reference as If fully Page 7 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- set forth In this Chapter Where the provi stons of this Zone do not discuss a specific condition or situation which arises the non provisions ofthe Anaheim Munic ipal Code shall apply 020 The Anaheim Resort Design Plan The site development standards set forth In Sections 1848 060 through 18 48 130 ofthis Chapter have been adopted to operate In conjunction With the Design Plan for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ident1lled In Section 5 0 of the Specific Plan document hereinafter referred to In this Chapter as the Design Plan as the same may be hereinafter amended In accordance With the Specific Plan amendment proce dures set forth In Chapter 18 93 entitled SPECIFIC PLANS of the Anaheim Munici pal Code Said Anaheim Resort Design Plan Is Incorporated herein by this reference as If fully set forth In this Chapter All develop ment otherwise permitted by this Chapter shall comply With any applicable provisions ofthe Design Plan 030 Compliance with City of Ana heim Codea All grading and subdivision plans shall comply With all applicable regu lations and be reviewed and processed In ac cordance with the procedures contained In Title 17 entitled LAND DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCES of the Anaheim Munici pal Code All construction shall comply With the provisions of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City of Anaheim and ap plicable sections ofTitle 15 BUILDING AND 0504 The site development standards HOUSING of the Anaheim Code In this Chapter shall apply to the Construction Within the Specl1lc Plan area structural expansion portion of may commence only after the 01 every building hereinafter ex rector finds that the construction proposal Is panded In substanuaJ compilance With these regula 0505 The Anaheim Resort Speclfic Plan tlons applicable polletes and guideUnes of encourages the enhancement of the Anaheim Resort Spec1flc Plan The lssU all buildings and structures Wlth ance of b permits may oniy occur af In the Specl1lc Plan boundaries ter Final Site Plan approval has been or6 lnc1u I nonconforming obtained from the City of Anaheim subject Ie I I and structures At to the procedures set forth In 18 48 040 020 t i1 S lMMhi cade Improvements Inte entitled FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW AND duct J rlor Improvements and APPROVAL ofthis Chapter a Improvements interior to orat the 040 Spedftc PlUl BouDdariea The rear of a development building Specl1lc Plan boundaries are Ident1lled on complex may be made to legal Exhibit 3 3 1a entitled Development Plan non conforming buildings or of the Specl1lc Plan document The Specl1lc structures subject to the approv Plan area encompasses two land use DIs al of the Planning Director pro the Commercial Recreation C R DIs vided the Improvements do not and the Public Recreation PR exceed live percent 5 of the The Speclfic Plan also encompasses the Mo building floor area are In bllehome Park MHP Overlay Zone as shown substanuaJ conformance With the The Anaheim Resort Areo Plan 18 48 020 GENERAL PROVISIONS Page 7 4 Section 7 0 Zoning Development Standards Yln f n Ibit 3 3 2a entitled Mobllehome Park MIl Overlay Zone The project area legal description is provided In Section 9 0 of the Speclfic Plan document The Zoning Map of the City shall reflect the boundaries of the Specific Plan area 050 Nonconforming Structures and Usea 0501 The provisions of Section 18 02 058 entitled NONCON FORMING STRUCTURES AND USES GENERAL of the Anaheim Municipal Code shall apply tp this Zone eX epl st Ea II e11 The provisions of Section 18 48 130 0207 entitled LEGAL NONCONFORMING SIGNS GEN ERAL of this Chapter shall apply to nonconforming signs The site development standards In Section 18 48 050 120 enti tled LANDSCAPING In this Chapter shall apply to all land scaping hereinafter Installed or modified and to all landscape on any lot or parcel a building hereinafter structurally modified to an extent exceeding forty five percent 45 of the gross floor area of said existing building within any two year peri od 0502 0503 02363 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- e e e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 7 0 Zoning Development Standards building envelope do not ad versely impact any adjacent par cels and are in conformance with the Design Plan and this Chap ter If the Planning Director de termines that adverse impacts may occur from the improve ments if the improvements would add any additional square footage beyond 5 ofthe building floor area or if the improvements are not in substantial conform ance with the building envelope the improvement plans shall re quire a conditional use permit subject to the provisions of Sec tion 18 03 030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code Notwithstanding the foregoing the Planning Direc tor may refer any of the above noted improvement pians to the Planning Commission for consid eration as a conditional use per mit 060 Zoning Code Any reference to the Zoning Code made in this Chapter shall mean Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code 070 Terms Terms used In this Chap ter shall have the same definitions as provid ed In the Anaheim Municipal Code unless otherwise defined In Sectlon 18 48 030 enti tled DEFINITIONS 080 General Plan Consistency In Resolution approving and the Specific Plan the City Council of the City ofAnaheim made certain findings of consistency between the General Plan of the City and the Specific Plan In future approvals as contemplated by this Chapter and by the Specific Plan the particular person or body so shall not do so In such a manner as to abrogate or nullify those findings 18 48 030 DEFINITIONS b EXpcOOIOf of us e Jf d otlr S1n rt S ni brig the use I dla bJ 6 iij i n O armer tpn rN u ltn e st e fic PI rn be ferlY tleJ wbjec 0 n if vJ e cono ioncl u e pe mi I aIl1t6 e 111 he P II51 r t S i I IID3 030 f4 e h1r r i lC F eode For the purposes of this Chapter the fol lowing terms phrases words and their deri vations shall have the meaning given herein The word shall Is always mandatoryand not merely directory 010 MAM Words Terms ADd Phruea 0101 Acceuory Use Permitted A Permitted Accessory Use Is a use which Is considered to be com patible with a Permitted Primary 020 0201 0202 030 0301 040 0401 18 48 030 DEFINITIONS Use while also being clearly inci dental to and integrated with the Permitted Primary Use A Permit ted Accessory Use is permitted as of right provided that the specific proposal for such a use conforms to all requirements of the Specific Plan A Permitted Accessory Use is a use which Is secondary or subordinate to a Permitted Pri mary Use GM Words Terms And Phrases Gross Acreage The total acreage of a parcel or lot measured from the ultimate public right of way except that due to the enhanced ultimate right of way widths re quired by adopted General Plan Amendment No 331 for Harbor Boulevard 12 feet Katella Ave nue 28 feet Freedman Way II 1 2 feet West Street Disney land Drive north of Ball Road 10 feetl and West Street Disney land Drive between Cerritos Ave nue and KateUa Avenue 2 1 2 feet to implement the Public Realm streetscape program properties along these streets may Include the additional right of way widths In their property gross acreage when computlng density Gross Square Footage The total square footage of a buUdlng or structure Including the exterior walls ofa llloors MH Words Terms ADd Phr Hotel Motel Gueat Suite A ho tel motel guest room or suite that Is for rent by a single party with one entry door key for the guest that also controls any doors Into or within the guest room or Into the service kitchen area A hotel motel guest suite shall be considered one room for the purpose of total room count permitted In the Specific Plan ar ea even If It Includes more than one room MN Words Terms aJld Phr ea Net Acreae The total acreage of aparcel or lot excluding the ulti mate right of way for all public Page 7 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Area Specific Plan Section 7 0 Zoning Deuelopment Standards 18 48 040 METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 050 0501 0502 0503 0504 060 0601 0602 070 0701 Page 7 6 streets P Words Terms And Phrases Parking Facilities An area or structure intended for the tempo rary storage of automobiles and other vehicles Such facilities may consist of but are not limit ed to surface parking lots park Ing structures and parking areas under buildings PllU1J1ing Director The Planning Director of the City of Anaheim or his or her duly authorized desig nee Porte Cochere An accessory use consisting of a reserved space roofed or unroofed and attached to the side or front of a building and established for the conve nient loading and unloading of passengers Public of Way Any area of real property dedicated to or owned by the City ofAnaheim or over whiCh the City of Anaheim holds any easement for public street alley sidewalk landscape utility or pedestrian purposes and accepted by resolution of the City Council 5 Woru Terms And Phrases Sign See Section 18 48 130 010 DEFINITIONS PER TAlNING TO SIGNS of this Chapter Strip shoppm centers A buJId ing or collection ofbuJIdings con ta1nIng retail and or commerCIal uses in which the primary arlen taUOn of the buJIdings entranc es signa and uses Is toward the adjacent public street and in wh1ch parking areas or access to parking areas are prominently displayed to passing veh1cles Such shopping centers contain uses intended to attract either the general public or tourists vis Itor and or recreational consum ers 1 WorcU TenuAnd Phrases Temporary parJdD Lots An area Intended for the temporary parking ofautomobiles and other vehicles and not intended to be the ultimate use of the property Transportation Facility FaclU ties and structures intended to accommodate transportation ter minal stations facilities Intended to accommodate the transfer from automobile or pedestrian travel to bus train or other forms of mass transit fixed transit guJdeways and other structures intended to move passengers or pedestrians from one location to another Tun block Anyone of several pavingproducts made of concrete or plastic which permit turf or other low growing plant materi als to grow through the paving so that the paving Is not easily seen Turf block paving Is intended for occasional vehicle traffic such as requtred emergency access through landscaped areas U Woru Tenu And Phrases mtimate Planned Right Of Way The right of waydesignated in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan as further described in Secttons 4 0 Public FaclUttes Plan and 5 0 Design Plan of the Anaheim Resort Spe c1fic Plan document Required setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate planned of way shown on the General Plan including any Intersec tton standard applicable to the property METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION The methods and procedures for imple mentation and of the Speci1lc Plan are prescribed as follows 010 ImplementaUon The Speci1lc Plan shall be Implemented through the pro cessing and approval of FInal Site Plans as described in this Section and hereinafter col lectively referred to as the F InaI Site Plans prior to issuance of buJId1ng landscape and or slgnage permits 020 P IJ1al Site PlaD Rmew and Ap proval 0201 Rmew uuI Approval Final Site 0702 0703 080 0801 11 48 040 02365 e e ---PAGE BREAK--- The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Section 7 0 Zoning Development Standards 18 48 040 METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION e Plans Including but not limited to Site Plans Floor Plans Eleva tions Signage Landscape Plans and such other plans and infor mation as required by the Plan ning Director shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department for review and ap proval by the City of Anaheim Planning Commission as a Re port and Recommendation item in accordance with the proce dures and containing the infor mation set forth In the Final Site Plan Review Application as adopted by Resolution of the City of Anaheim Planning Commis sion and on file with the Planning Department If the Final Site Plan is found to be 1n l staRttal con formance with the Specific Plan the Design Plan Section 5 0 of the Specific Plan document and the provisions of this Chapter the Final Site Plan shall be ap proved The Planning Commis slon s decision shall be final unless appealed to the City Council within ten 10 days from the date of such decision Plans submitted for Issuance of build Ing landscape or slgnage permits shall be in shltastant 1AJ conform ance with the approved Final Site Plans 0202 Appeal Proces The appeal shall be processed In the same manner as appeals for decisions on re use permits or variances as set forth In Sections 18 030 080 through 18 03 084 except that the appeal period shall be amaxlmum of ten 10 days 0203 En9iroam tal Review Not any other provision of this Chapter Final Site Plan review by the Plann1ng Depart ment JlOder Section 18 48 040 Zl 0201 entitled REVIEW AND APPROVAL shall Include a mln1ster1al determlna tion whether the proposed build Ing structure or use has been envtronmentally cleared on a proJect specific level by the Envl e e ronmental Impact Report for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR No 313 or other fmal envi ronmental documentation Ifnot then the proposed activity shall be subject to the preparation of an initial study and potential fur ther enVironmental review and mitigation pursuant to the proce dures outlined for subsequent projects under a Master EIR in Public Resources Code Section 21157 L 030 Development Review and Per mits Prior to commencing any work per taining to the erection construction reconstruction moving conversion alter ation or addltion to any or structure within this Zone all building and site plans shall be subject to review by the ZOning and Divisions of the Planning Depart ment of the City for conformance with the Specific Plan and the approved Final Site Plans and permits shall be secured from the Official of the City ofAnaheim In compliance with all provisions of Section 18 04 090 entitled DEVELOPMENT RE VIEW AND PERMITS GENERAL of this Code provided further that where there are existing buildings and structures on a site for which more intensive development is pro posed under the provisions of this Zone no permit shall be Issued until the Chief Building Offic1al and the FIre Chief have certl1led that the existing and structures are safe for occupancy and for human habitation 040 Landscape Plan Review The lo cation of all proposed on site and off site landscaping Includlng that within the park way area the area within the ultimate street right of way as In the Circulation Element of the General Plan as further de In Sections 4 0 Public FacUlties Plan and 5 0 Design Plan of the Specific Plan document shall be shown on a site plan drawn to scale and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City prtor to installation Such plans shall be consistent with Final Site Plans approved pursuant to Section 18 48 040 020entitled FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL and the provisions of the Design Plan 0150 Specific Plan Am tim h Amendments to the Specific Plan shall be processed In accordance with Chapter 18 93 entitled SPECIFIC PLANS of the Anaheim Page 7 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- e 6 These designatioDS are based upon hotelmotel development and allow up to 20 of each hotelmotel project gross square footage excluding parking facilities to be developed with integrated ie included within the main hotel motel complex accessory uses These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotelmotel density at the rate of one hotelmotel room per six hundred 600 gross square feet of accessory use For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels motels with accessory uses the traffie generation charaeteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel motel including accessory uses density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to Fmal Site Plan review and approval e e 17 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---