Full Text
May 2015 Southern California Association of Governments Profile of the City of Anaheim Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Regional Council includes 69 districts which represent 191 cities in the SCAG region. SCAG Regional Council District 19 includes only Anaheim Represented by: Hon. Kris Murray LOCAL PROFILES REPORT 2015 This profile report was prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments and shared with the City of Anaheim. SCAG provides local governments with a variety of benefits and services including, for example, data and information, GIS training, planning and technical assistance, and sustainability planning grants. ---PAGE BREAK--- Source: 2012 SCAG city boundary data, which is provided by the county Local Agency Formation Commissions. ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. POPULATION 4 III. HOUSEHOLDS 9 IV. HOUSING 12 V. TRANSPORTATION 18 VI. EMPLOYMENT 19 VII. RETAIL SALES 27 VIII. 28 IX. SCAG REGIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 31 X. DATA SOURCES 32 XI. METHODOLOGY 33 XII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 38 ---PAGE BREAK--- This Page Intentionally Left Blank ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 1 I. Introduction The purpose of this report is to provide current information and data for the City of Anaheim for planning and outreach efforts. Information on population, housing, transportation, employment, retail sales, and education can be utilized by the city to make informed planning decisions. The profile provides a portrait of the city and its changes since 2000, using average figures for Orange County as a comparative baseline. In addition, the most current data available for the region is also included in the Statistical Summary (page This profile demonstrates the current trends occurring in the City of Anaheim. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the largest Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in the nation. The SCAG region includes six counties (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) and 191 cities. As the designated MPO, SCAG is mandated by federal law to research and develop a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which incorporates a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) per California state law. SCAG is currently undertaking a variety of planning and policy initiatives to foster a more sustainable Southern California. In 2008, SCAG initiated the Local Profiles Project as a part of a larger initiative to provide a variety of services to its member cities and counties. Through extensive input from member jurisdictions, the inaugural Local Profiles Reports were released at the General Assembly in May 2009. The Profiles have been updated every two years. Local Profiles provide basic information about each member jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the following: How much growth in population has taken place since 2000? Has the local jurisdiction been growing faster or slower than the county or regional average? Have there been more or fewer school-age children? Have homeownership rates been increasing or decreasing? How and where do residents travel to work? How has the local economy been changing in terms of employment share by sectors? Have the local retail sales revenues recovered to pre-recession levels? Answers to questions such as these provide a snapshot of the dynamic changes affecting each local jurisdiction. Factors Affecting Local Changes Reflected in the 2015 Report Overall, member jurisdictions since 2000 were impacted by a variety of factors at the national, regional, and local levels. For example, the vast majority of member jurisdictions included in the 2015 Local Profiles reflect the national demographic trends toward an older and a more diverse population. Evidence of the slow process towards economic recovery is also apparent through gradual increases in employment, retail sales, building permits, and home prices. Work destinations and commute times correlate with regional development patterns and the geographical location of local jurisdictions, particularly in relation to the regional transportation system. ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 2 Uses of the Local Profiles Following release at the SCAG General Assembly, the Local Profiles are posted on the SCAG website and are used for a variety of purposes including, but not limited to, the following: Data and communication resources for elected officials, businesses, and residents Community planning and outreach Economic development Visioning initiatives Grant application support Performance monitoring The primary user groups of the Profiles include member jurisdictions and state and federal legislative delegates of Southern California. This profile report is a SCAG member benefit and the use of the data contained within this report is voluntary. Report Organization This profile report has three sections. The first section presents a Statistical Summary for the City of Anaheim. The second section provides detailed information organized by subject areas and includes brief highlights on the impacts of the recent economic recession and recovery at the regional level. The third section, Methodology, describes technical considerations related to data definitions, measurement, and data sources. ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 3 2014 STATISTICAL SUMMARY Category Anaheim Orange County Anaheim relative to Orange County* SCAG Region 2014 Total Population 348,305 3,113,991 [11.2%] 18,645,437 2014 Median Age (Years) 33.6 37.0 -3.4 35.5 2014 Hispanic 55.2% 35.2% 20.0% 46.8% 2014 Non-Hispanic White 24.6% 41.7% -17.1% 31.8% 2014 Non-Hispanic Asian 15.1% 18.4% -3.3% 12.4% 2014 Non-Hispanic Black 2.7% 1.7% 1.0% 6.3% 2014 Non-Hispanic American Indian 2014 All Other Non-Hispanic 2.0% 2.7% 2.5% 2014 Number of Households 99,944 1,005,957 6,029,326 2014 Average Household Size 3.4 3.0 0.4 3.1 2014 Median Household Income 59,272 72,262 -12,990 56,737 2014 Number of Housing Units 105,987 1,062,966 [10%] 6,524,730 2014 Homeownership Rate 49.2% 54.5% -5.3% 54.5% 2014 Median Existing Home Sales Price 445,000 581,000 -136,000 426,000 2013 - 2014 Median Home Sales Price Change 7.9% 8.6% -0.65% 10.1% 2014 Drive Alone to Work 77.9% 82.2% -4.3% 78.2% 2014 Mean Travel Time to Work (minutes) 29.8 28.8 1 31.7 2013 Number of Jobs 183,144 1,570,830 [11.7%] 7,660,489 2012 - 2013 Total Jobs Change 5,272 44,603 [11.8%] 231,953 2013 Average Salary per Job 43,167 52,479 -9,312 48,213 2014 K-12 Public School Student Enrollment 60,630 499,555 12.1% 3,058,957 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey, 2014; Nielsen Co.; California Department of Finance E-5, May 2014; MDA Data Quick; California Department of Education; and SCAG * Numbers with [ ] represent Anaheim’s share of Orange County. The other numbers represent the difference between Anaheim and Orange County. Mapped jurisdictional boundaries are as of July 1, 2012 and are for visual purposes only. Report data, however, are updated according to their respective sources. ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 4 II. Population Population Growth Population: 2000 - 2014 Source: California Department of Finance, E-5, 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the total population of the City of Anaheim increased by 20,291 to 348,305 in 2014. During this 14- year period, the city’s population growth rate of 6.2 percent was lower than the Orange County rate of 9.4 percent. 11.2% of the total population of Orange County is in the City of Anaheim. 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Population ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 5 Population by Age Population Share by Age: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the age group 55-64 experienced the largest increase in share, growing from 6.7 to 10.2 percent. The age group that experienced the greatest decline, by share, was age group 21-34, decreasing from 24 to 21.3 percent. Population by Age: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 The age group 55-64 added the most population, with an increase of 14,054 people between 2000 and 2014. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0-4 5-20 21-34 35-54 55-64 65+ Share of City Population 2000 2010 2014 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 Population 2000 2010 2014 ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 6 Population by Race/Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino of Any Race: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the share of Hispanic population in the city increased from 46.8 percent to 55.2 percent. Non-Hispanic White: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the share of Non- Hispanic White population in the city decreased from 35.9 percent to 24.6 percent. Please refer to the Methodology section for definitions of the racial/ethnic categories. 46.8% 52.8% 55.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2000 2010 2014 Share of City Population 35.9% 27.5% 24.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2000 2010 2014 Share of City Population ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 7 Non-Hispanic Asian: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the share of Non- Hispanic Asian population in the city increased from 11.9 percent to 15.1 percent. Non-Hispanic Black: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the share of Non- Hispanic Black population in the city increased from 2.4 percent to 2.7 percent. 11.9% 14.6% 15.1% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 2000 2010 2014 Share of City Population 2.4% 2.4% 2.7% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2000 2010 2014 Share of City Population ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 8 Non-Hispanic American Indian: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the share of Non- Hispanic American Indian population in the city decreased from 0.3 percent to 0.2 percent. All Other Non-Hispanic: 2000, 2010, and 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the share of All Other Non- Hispanic population group in the city decreased from 2.8 percent to 2.0 percent. 0.32% 0.20% 0.20% 0.00% 0.05% 0.10% 0.15% 0.20% 0.25% 0.30% 0.35% 2000 2010 2014 Share of City Population 2.8% 2.5% 2.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2000 2010 2014 Share of City Population ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 9 III. Households Number of Households (Occupied Housing Units) Number of Households: 2000 - 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; California Department of Finance, E-5, 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the total number of households in the City of Anaheim increased by 2,975 units, or 3.1 percent. During this 14- year period, the city’s household growth rate of 3.1 percent was lower than the county growth rate of 7.6 percent. 9.9 percent of Orange County’s total number of households are in the City of Anaheim. In 2014, the city’s average household size was 3.4, higher than the county average of 3.0. Average Household Size: 2000 - 2014 Source: California Department of Finance, E-5, 2014 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Households 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Average Household Size Anaheim Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 10 Households by Size Percent of Households by Household Size: 2014 Source: Nielsen Co., 2014 In 2014, 58.5 percent of all city households had 3 people or fewer. About 18 percent of the households were single-person households. Approximately 25 percent of all households in the city had 5 people or more. Households by Income Percent of Households by Household Income: 2014 Source: Nielsen Co., 2014 In 2014, about 44 percent of households earned less than $50,000 annually. Approximately 25 percent of households earned $100,000 or more. 18% 24% 17% 17% 11% 6% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 or More Share of Households Number of Persons 9% 10% 11% 14% 18% 14% 15% 7% 2% 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Share of Households ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 11 Household Income Median Household Income: 2000, 2010, & 2014 Source: Nielsen Co., 2014 From 2000 to 2014, median household income increased by $12,355. Note: Dollars are not adjusted for annual inflation. Renters and Homeowners Percentage of Renters and Homeowners: 2000, 2010, & 2014 2000 2010 2014 Sources: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, homeownership rates decreased and the share of renters increased. $46,917 $57,807 $59,272 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 2000 2010 2014 Median Household Income Rent 50.0% Own 50.0% Rent 51.5% Own 48.5% Rent 50.8% Own 49.2% ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 12 IV. Housing Total Housing Production Total Permits Issued for all Residential Units: 2000 - 2014 Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000 - 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, permits were issued for 6,190 residential units. Permits Issued for all Residential Units per 1,000 Residents: 2000 - 2014 Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000 - 2014 In 2000, the City of Anaheim had 1 permit per 1,000 residents compared to the overall county figure of 4.5 permits per 1,000 residents. For the city in 2014, the number of permits per 1,000 residents increased to 1.7 permits. For the county overall, it decreased to 1.9 permits per 1,000 residents. 327 79 411 376 257 763 721 875 506 307 105 147 334 409 573 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Permits 0 1 2 3 4 5 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Permits per 1,000 Population Anaheim Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 13 Single-Family Housing Production Permits Issued for Single-Family Units: 2000 - 2014 Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000 - 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, permits were issued for 1,213 single family homes. 18.1 percent of these were issued in the last 3 years. Single-Family Permits Issued per 1,000 Residents: 2000 - 2014 Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000 - 2014 In 2000, the City of Anaheim issued 0.3 permits per 1,000 residents compared to the overall county figure of 2.4 permits per 1,000 residents. For the city in 2014, the number of permits issued per 1,000 residents decreased to 0.1 permits. For the county overall, it decreased to 0.8 permits per 1,000 residents. 114 75 161 268 86 76 64 35 27 17 44 27 141 43 35 0 50 100 150 200 [PHONE REDACTED] 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Permits 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Permits per 1,000 Residents Anaheim Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 14 Multi-Family Housing Production Permits Issued for Multi-Family Units: 2000 - 2014 Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000-2014; City of Anaheim Between 2000 and 2014, there were permits issued for 4,977 multi-family residential units. Multi-Family Permits Issued per 1,000 Residents: 2000 - 2014 Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000-2014 For the city in 2014, the number of permits per 1,000 residents increased to 1.6 permits. For the county overall, it decreased to 1.1 permits per 1,000 residents. 213 4 250 108 171 687 657 840 479 290 61 120 193 366 538 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 [PHONE REDACTED] 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Permits 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Permits per 1,000 Population Anaheim Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 15 Home Sales Prices Median Home Sales Price for Existing Homes: 2000 - 2014 (in $ thousands) Source: MDA Data Quick, 2014 Annual Median Home Sales Price Change for Existing Homes: 2000 - 2014 Source: MDA Data Quick, 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the median home sales price increased 107 percent from $215,000 to $445,000. Median home sales price increased by 27.1 percent between 2010 and 2014. In 2014, the median home sales price in the city was $445,000, $136,000 lower than that in the county overall. Note: Median home sales price reflects resale of existing homes and provides guidance on the market values of homes sold. Between 2000 and 2014, the largest single year increase was 28.6 percent. $215 $240 $285 $350 $450 $540 $588 $550 $369 $335 $350 $332 $345 $412 $445 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 In thousands 11.6% 18.8% 22.8% 28.6% 20.0% 8.9% -6.5% -32.9% -9.2% 4.5% -5.1% 3.9% 19.5% 7.9% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 00-01 02-03 04-05 06-07 08-09 10-11 12-13 Sales Price Change ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 16 Housing Units by Housing Type: 2014 Housing Type Number of Units Percent of Total Units Single Family Detached 44,941 42.4 % Single Family Attached 8,902 8.4 % Multi-family: 2 to 4 units 11,390 10.7 % Multi-family: 5 units plus 36,069 34 % Mobile Home 4,685 4.4 % Total 105,987 100 % Source: California Department of Finance, E-5, 2014 The most common housing type is Single Family Detached. Approximately 50.8 percent were single family homes and 44.8 percent were multi- family homes. Age of Housing Stock Source: Nielsen Co., 2014 About 48 percent of the housing stock was built before 1970. Approximately 52 percent of the housing stock was built after 1970. 2.9% 2.6% 22.4% 19.1% 23.1% 12.9% 10.1% 3.3% 3.5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Share of Homes ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 17 Foreclosures There were a total of 65 foreclosures in 2014. Between 2007 and 2014, there were a total of 5,698 foreclosures. Source: MDA Data Quick, 2014 68 32 12 9 82 621 1,655 1,099 823 809 442 184 65 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Foreclosures ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 18 V. Transportation Journey to Work for Residents Transportation Mode Choice: 2000, 2010, & 2014 Sources: 2000 U.S. Decennial Census; 2010 U.S. Census American Community Survey; and Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the greatest change occurred in the percentage of individuals who traveled to work by driving; this share increased by 5.1 percentage points. ‘Other’ refers to bicycle, pedestrian, and home-based employment. Average Travel Time (minutes): 2000, 2010, & 2014 Sources: 2000 U.S. Decennial Census; 2010 U.S. Census American Community Survey; and Nielsen Co., 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, the average travel time to work decreased by approximately 1 minute. 73% 18% 5% 5% 74% 15% 6% 5% 78% 13% 5% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Drive Alone Carpool Public Transit Other Percent of City Residents 2000 2010 2014 31 30 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2000 2010 2014 Travel Time (minutes) ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 19 VI. Employment Top 10 Places Where Residents Commute to Work Local Jurisdiction Number of Commuters Percent of Total Commuters 1. Anaheim 22,901 17.46 % 2. Los Angeles 9,926 7.57 % 3. Santa Ana 9,638 7.35 % 4. Irvine 8,571 6.53 % 5. Orange 6,930 5.28 % 6. Fullerton 4,437 3.38 % 7. Garden Grove 3,343 2.55 % 8. Costa Mesa 3,121 2.38 % 9. Long Beach 2,833 2.16 % 10. Buena Park 2,572 1.96 % All Other Destinations 56,898 43.38 % Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014, LODES Data; Longitudinal-Employer Household Dynamics Program, 2011 This table identifies the top 10 locations where residents from the City of Anaheim commute to work. 17.5% work in the city where they live, while 82.5% commute to other places. ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 21 ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 22 Total Jobs: 2007 - 2013 Sources: California Employment Development Department, 2007 - 2013; InfoGroup; and SCAG Total jobs include wage and salary jobs and jobs held by business owners and self-employed persons. The total job count does not include unpaid volunteers or family workers, and private household workers. In 2013, total jobs in the City of Anaheim numbered 183,144, a decrease of 6.7 percent from 2007. Jobs in Manufacturing: 2007 - 2013 Sources: California Employment Development Department, 2007 - 2013; InfoGroup; and SCAG Manufacturing jobs include those employed in various sectors including food; apparel; metal; petroleum and coal; machinery; computer and electronic products; and transportation equipment. Between 2007 and 2013, the number of manufacturing jobs in the city decreased by 15.8 percent. 196,223 191,921 176,740 174,005 175,959 177,872 183,143 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number of Jobs 26,258 25,348 22,533 21,893 22,362 22,146 22,104 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number of Jobs ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 23 Jobs in Construction: 2007 - 2013 Sources: California Employment Development Department, 2007 - 2013; InfoGroup; and SCAG Construction jobs include those engaged in both residential and non-residential construction. Between 2007 and 2013, construction jobs in the city decreased by 29.4 percent. Jobs in Retail Trade: 2007 - 2013 Sources: California Employment Development Department, 2007 - 2013; InfoGroup; and SCAG Retail trade jobs include those at various retailers including motor vehicle and parts dealers, furniture, electronics and appliances, building materials, food and beverage, clothing, sporting goods, books, and office supplies. Between 2007 and 2013, the number of retail trade jobs in the city decreased by 13.9 percent. 20,804 18,404 14,994 13,742 13,794 13,564 14,684 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number of Jobs 15,322 14,796 13,537 13,323 13,466 13,032 13,195 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number of Jobs ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 24 Jobs in Professional and Management: 2007 - 2013 Sources: California Employment Development Department, 2007 - 2013; InfoGroup; and SCAG Jobs in the professional and management sector include those employed in professional and technical services, management of companies, and administration and support. Between 2007 and 2013, the number of professional and management jobs in the city increased by 3.8 percent. 35,332 34,515 31,137 31,568 31,987 36,039 36,676 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number of Jobs ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 25 Jobs by Sector: 2007 Sources: California Employment Development Department, 2007; InfoGroup; and SCAG. From 2007 to 2013, the share of Leisure jobs increased from 14 percent to 16.2 percent. See Methodology Section for industry sector definitions. Jobs by Sector: 2013 Sources: California Employment Development Department, 2014; InfoGroup; and SCAG. In 2013, the Professional sector was the largest job sector, accounting for 18.6 percent of total jobs in the city. Other large sectors included Education (16.2 percent), Leisure (16.2 percent), and Manufacturing (12 percent). Agriculture 0.4% Construction 10.6% Manufacturing 13.4% Wholesale 7.4% Retail 7.8% Transportation 3.1% Information 1.4% Finance 4.7% Professional 18.0% Education 14.1% Leisure 14.0% Other 2.9% Public 2.0% Agriculture 0.3% Construction 7.5% Manufacturing 12.0% Wholesale 7.4% Retail 7.9% Transportation 3.6% Information 1.2% Finance 4.1% Professional 18.6% Education 16.2% Leisure 16.2% Other 3.0% Public 2.0% ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 26 Average Salaries Average Annual Salary: 2003, 2009, 2011, & 2013 Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003, 2009, 2011, 2013 Average salaries for jobs located in the city increased from $38,072 in 2003 to $43,167 in 2013, a 13.4 percent change. Note: Dollars are not adjusted for annual inflation. Average Annual Salary by Sector: 2013 thousands) Source: California Employment Development Department, 2013 In 2013, the employment sector providing the highest salary per job in the city was Public Administration ($87,194). The Leisure- Hospitality sector provided the lowest annual salary per job ($23,141). $38,072 $43,741 $43,849 $43,167 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 2003 2009 2011 2013 Average Annual Salary $43 $36 $56 $52 $55 $63 $57 $66 $44 $23 $87 $36 $51 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 All Agriculture Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Information Finance-Insurance-Real Estate Professional-Management Education-Health Leisure-Hospitality Public Administration Other Services Non-Classified ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 27 VII. Retail Sales Real Retail Sales: 2001 - 2013 (in 2013 $ millions) Source: California Board of Equalization, 2001-2013 Real (inflation adjusted) retail sales in the City of Anaheim increased by 28.3 percent between 2000 and 2005. Real retail sales decreased by 16.4 percent between 2005 and 2013. Real Retail Sales per Person: 2001 - 2013 (in 2013 $ thousands) Source: California Board of Equalization, 2001-2013 Between 2001 and 2013, retail sales per person for the city increased from $9,337 to $9,482. $3,297 $3,310 $3,500 $3,859 $3,931 $3,817 $3,639 $3,315 $2,868 $3,000 $3,149 $3,226 $3,286 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Sales in 2013 $ millions $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $18 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Sales in 2013 $ thousands Anaheim Orange County ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 28 VIII. Education K-12 Public School Student Enrollment: 2000 - 2014 Source: California Department of Education, 2000 - 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, total K-12 public school enrollment for schools within the City of Anaheim decreased by 2,741 students, or about 4.3 percent. K-6 Public School Student Enrollment: 2000 - 2014 Source: California Department of Education, 2000 - 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, total public elementary school enrollment decreased by 3,522 students or 9.9 percent. 63,371 65,760 66,972 65,920 63,804 63,137 61,829 60,630 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Students 35,672 36,964 36,494 34,654 32,381 32,423 32,241 32,150 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Students ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 29 Grades 7-9 Public School Student Enrollment: 2000 - 2014 Source: California Department of Education, 2000 - 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, total public school enrollment for grades 7-9 decreased by 426 students or 3 percent. Grades 10-12 Public School Student Enrollment: 2000 - 2014 Source: California Department of Education, 2000 - 2014 Between 2000 and 2014, total public school enrollment for grades 10-12 increased by 1,207 students, about 8.8 percent. 13,970 14,953 16,311 16,037 15,590 14,457 13,953 13,544 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Students 13,729 13,843 14,167 15,229 15,833 16,257 15,635 14,936 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Number of Students ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 30 Percent of City Population 25 Years & Over Completing High School or Higher Sources: 2000 and 2010 Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 In 2014, 74.7 percent of the population 25 years and over completed high school or higher, which is higher than the 2000 level. Percent of City Population 25 Years & Over Completing a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher In 2014, 24.2 percent of the population 25 years and over completed a Bachelor’s degree or higher, which is higher than the 2000 level. Sources: 2000 and 2010 Census; Nielsen Co., 2014 69.3% 73.7% 74.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2010 2014 Percent of Population 19.6% 23.1% 24.2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2000 2010 2014 Percent of Population ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 31 IX. SCAG Regional Highlights Regional Median Sales Price for Existing Homes: 2000 - 2014 Source: MDA Data Quick, 2014 After reaching its peak in 2007, the median sales price for existing homes in the SCAG region dropped by almost half by 2011 from its 2007 level and rebounded from 2012 to 2014. Median home sales price was calculated based on total existing home sales in the SCAG region. Regional Real Retail Sales: 2001 - 2013 Source: California Board of Equalization, 2001-2013 Retail sales tend to follow closely with trends in personal income, employment rates, and consumer confidence. Between 2001 and 2005, real (inflation adjusted) retail sales increased steadily by 19 percent but then dropped between 2005 and 2009 by $52 billion, or 25 percent. In 2013, total real retail sales were three percent higher than the 2001 level. $218,000 $240,000 $279,000 $330,000 $410,000 $491,000 $531,000 $552,000 $387,000 $276,000 $291,000 $280,000 $298,000 $372,000 $426,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Median Sales Price 183,584 186,712 196,784 210,683 217,810 216,878 208,809 185,386 162,638 167,289 171,722 183,871 188,302 $0 $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 $150,000 $175,000 $200,000 $225,000 $250,000 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 In 2013 $ millions ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 32 X. Data Sources California Department of Education California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information Division California State Board of Equalization Construction Industry Research Board InfoGroup MDA Data Quick Nielsen Company U.S. Census Bureau ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 33 XI. Methodology SCAG’s Local Profiles utilizes the most up-to-date information from a number of publically available sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau, California Department of Finance, and the California Department of Education. In the event that public information is not available or is not the most recent, SCAG contracts with a number of private entities to obtain regional data. The following sections describe how each data source was compiled to produce the information displayed in this report. Statistical Summary Table In the Statistical Summary Table (page the values in the field “Jurisdiction Relative to County/Region” represent the difference between the jurisdiction’s value and the county/region value, except for the following categories which represent the jurisdiction’s value as a share of the county (or in the case of an entire county as a share of the region): Population, Number of Households, Number of Housing Units, Number of Jobs, Total Jobs Change, and K-12 Student Enrollment. Median Age, Homeownership Rate, and Median Household Income are based on Nielsen Company data. Number of Housing Units is based on the 2010 Census and estimates from the California Department of Finance. Data for all other categories are referenced throughout the report. Population Section Where referenced, data from 2000 to 2014 was taken from the California Department of Finance’s (DOF) E-5 estimates, which were published in May 2014. This dataset was benchmarked to population figures from the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Censuses. Data relating to population by age group and by race/ethnicity was derived from the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Censuses, and Nielsen Co. The 2000 figure was based on U.S. Decennial Census figures for April 1, 2000 and the 2010 figure was based on U.S. Decennial Census figures for April 1, 2010. Below are definitions for race and ethnicity, taken from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Hispanic or Latino origin category is: A person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. The race categories are: American Indian or Alaska Native – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment. Asian – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam. Black or African American – A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa, including those who consider themselves to be "Haitian." ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 34 White – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, North Africa, or the Middle East. Some other race – This category includes Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands) and all other responses not included in the "American Indian or Alaska Native," "Asian," "Black or African American," and "White" race categories described above. Charts for population based on age were tabulated using 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census data and Nielsen Company data for 2014. Charts for race/ethnicity were tabulated using 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census data and Nielsen Company data for 2014. Households Section The 2000 figure was based on U.S. Decennial Census figures for April 1, 2000 and the 2010 figure was based on U.S. Decennial Census figures for April 1, 2010. Information for 2014 was supplied by the Nielsen Company. Average household size was developed using information from the California Department of Finance (DOF). Households by Size was calculated based on Nielsen Company data. Households refer to the number of occupied housing units. Housing Section Housing units are the total number of both vacant and occupied units. Housing units by housing type information was developed using data from the California Department of Finance (DOF). Age of housing stock information is from the Nielsen Company. The number of residential units with permits issued was obtained using Construction Industry Research Board data, which are collected by counties and are self-reported by individual jurisdictions. It represents both new single family and new multifamily housing units that were permitted to be built, along with building permits that were issued for improvements to existing residential structures re-roofs, remodels). Please note that SCAG opted to report the annual number of permits issued by each jurisdiction which may be different than the number of housing units completed or constructed annually. This was done using a single data source which provides consistent data for all jurisdictions. The Construction Industry Research Board defines “multi-family housing” to include duplexes, apartments, and condominiums in structures of more than one living unit. The median home sales price, compiled from MDA Data Quick, was calculated based on total resales of existing homes in the jurisdiction, including single family units and condominiums. The median price does not reflect the entire universe of housing in the jurisdiction, only those that were sold within the calendar year. Transportation Section The journey to work data for the year 2000 was obtained by using the 2000 U.S. Decennial Census Summary File 3. Data for 2010 is based on the 2010 U.S. Census American Community Survey. Information for 2014 was provided by the Nielsen Company. ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 35 Employment Section Data sources for estimating jurisdiction employment and wage information include the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau Local Employment Dynamics Survey, and information from the California Employment Development Department, InfoGroup, and SCAG for years 2007- 2013. In many instances, employment totals from individual businesses were geocoded and aggregated to the jurisdictional level. Employment information by industry type is defined by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Although the NAICS provides a great level of detail on industry definitions for all types of businesses in North America, for the purposes of this report, this list of industries has been summarized into the following major areas: agriculture, construction, manufacturing, wholesale, retail, information, finance/insurance/real estate, professional/management, education/health, leisure/hospitality, public administration, other services, and non-classified industries. A brief description of each major industry area is provided below: Agriculture – This industry includes crop production, animal production and aquaculture, forestry and logging, fishing hunting and trapping, and support activities for agriculture and forestry. Construction – Industries under this umbrella involve the construction of buildings, heavy and civil engineering construction, and specialty trade contractors. Manufacturing – This group includes the processing of raw material into products for trade, such as food manufacturing, apparel manufacturing, wood product manufacturing, petroleum and coal products manufacturing, chemical manufacturing, plastics and rubber products manufacturing, nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing and primary metal manufacturing. Wholesale – Wholesale industries do business in the trade of raw materials and durable goods. Retail – Retail industries engage in the sale of durable goods directly to consumers. Information – Businesses in this industry specialize in the distribution of content through a means of sources, including newspaper, periodicals, books, software, motion pictures, sound recording, radio and television broadcasting, cable or subscription programming, telecommunications, data processing/hosting, and other information mediums. Finance/Insurance/Real Estate – This sector includes businesses associated with banking, consumer lending, credit intermediation, securities brokerage, commodities exchanges, health/life/medical/title/property/casualty insurance agencies and brokerages, and real estate rental/leasing/sales. Professional Management – This industry involves businesses that specialize in professional/scientific/technical services, management of companies and enterprises, and administrative and support services. Types of establishments that would fall under this category range from law offices, accounting services, architectural/engineering firms, specialized design services, computer systems design and related services, management consulting firms, scientific research and ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 36 development services, advertising firms, office administrative services, facilities support services, among many others. Education/Health – Organizations include elementary and secondary schools, junior colleges, universities, professional schools, technical and trade schools, medical offices, dental offices, outpatient care centers, medical and diagnostic laboratories, hospitals, nursing and residential care facilities, social assistance services, emergency relief services, vocational rehabilitation services, and child day care services. Leisure/Hospitality – These industries include organizations in the performing arts, spectator sports, museums, amusement/recreation industries, traveler accommodations, and food and drink services. Public Administration – This classification includes public sector organizations, including legislative bodies, public finance institutions, executive and legislative offices, courts, police protection, parole offices, fire protection, correctional institutions, administration of governmental programs, space research and technology, and national security. Other Services – Groups in this group include, for example, automotive repair and maintenance, personal and household goods repair and maintenance, personal laundry services, dry-cleaning and laundry services, religious services, social advocacy organizations, professional organizations, and private households Non-Classified – Non-classified organizations involve work activites that are not included in the North American Industry Classification System. Retail Sales Section Retail sales data is obtained from the California Board of Equalization, which does not publish individual point-of-sale data. All data is adjusted for inflation. Education Section Student enrollment data is based on public school campuses that are located within each jurisdiction’s respective boundary. Enrollment numbers by grade within a given jurisdiction are tabulated based upon data obtained from the California Department of Education. Enrollment year is based on the end date of the school year; for example, enrollment data for the year 2000 refers to the 1999-2000 school year. City boundaries used in the dataset for all years is based on data provided by the Local Agency Formation Commission for each county in the region. Regional Highlights Information for this section was developed through data from MDA Data Quick and the California Board of Equalization. ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 37 Data Sources Section In choosing the data sources used for this report, the following factors were considered: • Availability for all jurisdictions in the SCAG region, • The most recognized source on the subject, • Data sources within the public domain, and • Data available on an annual basis. The same data sources are used for all Local Profiles (except where noted) to maintain overall reporting consistency. The jurisdictions are not constrained from using other data sources for their planning activities. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Additional assistance was provided by the California Department of Transportation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 38 XII. Acknowledgments SCAG Management Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Sharon Neely, Chief Deputy Executive Director Debbie Dillon, Deputy Executive Director, Administration Joann Africa, Chief Counsel/Director, Legal Services Huasha Liu, Director, Land Use & Environmental Planning Rich Macias, Director, Transportation Planning Darin Chidsey, Director, Strategy, Policy & Public Affairs Basil Panas, Chief Financial Officer Catherine Chief Information Officer Project Managers Ping Chang, Program Manager, Land Use & Environmental Planning Michael Gainor, Senior Regional Planner Project Core Team Kimberly Clark, Senior Regional Planner Prabhu Rajendran, Senior Application Developer Jung Seo, Senior Regional Planner Alex Yu, Manager, Application Development Reproduction Pat Camacho, Office Services Specialist Assistance from the following SCAG staff members is also recognized: Matthew Abad, SCAG Intern Precy Agtarap, SCAG Intern Anita Au, Assistant Regional Planner Ludlow Brown, Graphics Designer Diana Chamberlain, Graphics Designer John Cho, Associate Regional Planner Christine Delostrinos, SCAG Intern Stacy Farfan, SCAG Intern Carolyn Hart, Lead Graphics Designer Gurpreet Kaur, Programmer Analyst Cheol-Ho Lee, Senior Regional Planner JiSu Lee, SCAG Intern Weining Liang, SCAG Intern Jeff Liu, Manager, Media and Public Affaris Jonathan Nadler, Manager (former), Compliance & Performance Monitoring Frank Wen, Manager, Research & Analysis Ying Zhou, Program Manager II ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments Regional Council Roster May 2015 Southern California Association of Governments 39 Build 2.0.0.33 President 1. Hon. Carl Morehouse San Buenaventura District 47 1st Vice-President 2. Hon. Cheryl Viegas-Walker El Centro District 1 2nd Vice-President 3. Hon. Michele Martinez Santa Ana District 16 Imm. Past President 4. Hon. Greg Pettis Cathedral City District 2 5. Hon. Jack Terrazas Imperial County 6. Hon. Mark Ridley-Thomas Los Angeles County 7. Hon. Michael Antonovich Los Angeles County 8. Hon. Jim Katapodis OCTA 9. Hon. Michelle Steel Orange County 10. Hon. Curt Hagman San Bernardino County 11. Hon. Linda Parks Ventura County 12. Hon. Chuck Washington Riverside County 13. Hon. Jan Harnik Palm Desert RCTC 14. Hon. Alan Wapner Ontario SANBAG 15. Hon. Keith Millhouse Moorpark VCTC 16. Hon. Jim Hyatt Calimesa District 3 17. Hon. Clint Lorimore Eastvale District 4 18. Hon. Randon Lane Murrieta District 5 19. Hon. Frank Navarro Colton District 6 20. Hon. Larry McCallon Highland District 7 21. Hon. Deborah Robertson Rialto District 8 22. Hon. Paul Eaton Montclair District 9 23. Hon. Ray Marquez Chino Hills District 10 24. Hon. Bill Jahn Big Bear Lake District 11 25. Hon. Mike Munzing Aliso Viejo District 12 26. Hon. Barbara Kogerman Laguna Hills District 13 27. Hon. Steven Choi Irvine District 14 28. Hon. Steve Nagel Fountain Valley District 15 29. Hon. John Nielsen Tustin District 17 30. Hon. Steve Hwangbo La Palma District 18 31. Hon. Kris Murray Anaheim District 19 32. Hon. Tri Ta Westminster District 20 33. Hon. Art Brown Buena Park District 21 34. Hon. Marty Simonoff Brea District 22 35. Hon. Victor Manalo Artesia District 23 36. Hon. Gene Daniels Paramount District 24 37. Hon. Sean Ashton Downey District 25 38. Hon. José Luis Solache Lynwood District 26 39. Hon. Ali Saleh Bell District 27 40. Hon. Dan Medina Gardena District 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments Regional Council Roster May 2015 Southern California Association of Governments 40 Build 2.0.0.33 41. Hon. Rex Richardson Long Beach District 29 42. Hon. Lena Gonzalez Long Beach District 30 43. Hon. Andrew Sarega La Mirada District 31 44. Hon. Margaret Clark Rosemead District 32 45. Hon. Gene Murabito Glendora District 33 46. Hon. Barbara Messina Alhambra District 34 47. Hon. Margaret E. Finlay Duarte District 35 48. Hon. Jonathan Curtis La Cañada/Flintridge District 36 49. Hon. Carol Herrera Diamond Bar District 37 50. Hon. Sam Pedroza Claremont District 38 51. Hon. James Gazeley Lomita District 39 52. Hon. Judy Mitchell Rolling Hills Estates District 40 53. Hon. Pam O’Connor Santa Monica District 41 54. Hon. Jess Talamantes Burbank District 42 55. Hon. Steven Hofbauer Palmdale District 43 56. Hon. John Sibert Malibu District 44 57. Hon. Carmen Ramirez Oxnard District 45 58. Hon. Glen Becerra Simi Valley District 46 59. Hon. Gilbert Cedillo Los Angeles District 48 60. Hon. Paul Krekorian Los Angeles District 49 61. Hon. Bob Blumenfield Los Angeles District 50 62. Hon. Tom LaBonge Los Angeles District 51 63. Hon. Paul Koretz Los Angeles District 52 64. Hon. Nury Martinez Los Angeles District 53 65. Hon. Felipe Fuentes Los Angeles District 54 66. Hon. Bernard C. Parks Los Angeles District 55 67. Hon. Curren D. Price, Jr. Los Angeles District 56 68. Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr. Los Angeles District 57 69. Hon. Mike Bonin Los Angeles District 58 70. Hon. Mitchell Englander Los Angeles District 59 71. Hon. Mitch O’Farrell Los Angeles District 60 72. Hon. José Huizar Los Angeles District 61 73. Hon. Joe Buscaino Los Angeles District 62 74. Hon. Karen Spiegel Corona District 63 75. Hon. Barbara Delgleize Huntington Beach District 64 76. Hon. Ryan McEachron Victorville District 65 77. Hon. Michael Wilson Indio District 66 78. Hon. Dante Acosta Santa Clarita District 67 79. Hon. Rusty Bailey Riverside District 68 80. Hon. Julio Rodriguez Perris District 69 ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments Regional Council Roster May 2015 Southern California Association of Governments 41 Build 2.0.0.33 81. Hon. Ross Chun Aliso Viejo TCA 82. Hon. Andrew Masiel, Sr. Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians Tribal Government Representative 83. Mr. Randall Lewis Lewis Group of Companies (Ex-Officio) 84. Hon. Eric Garcetti Los Angeles (At-Large) ---PAGE BREAK--- Southern California Association of Governments 42 Build 2.0.0.33 Notes: