Document Anaheim_doc_2b55fdee4b

Appendices SEIR No. 339 City of Anaheim Appendix C Air Quality Modeling Output ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendices The Planning Center August 2010 This page left blank intentionally. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Glassell&Walnut.txt CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 1 JOB: 89. Glassell and Walnut RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide I. SITE VARIABLES U= 1.0 M/S Z0= 175. CM ALT= 0. BRG= WORST CASE VD= .0 CM/S CLAS= 7 VS= .0 CM/S MIXH= 1000. M AMB= 5.8 PPM SIGTH= 5. DEGREES TEMP= 15.0 DEGREE II. LINK VARIABLES LINK * LINK COORDINATES * EF H W DESCRIPTION * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * TYPE VPH (G/MI) A. NF * 4 -450 4 -150 * AG 1550 1.0 .0 9.6 B. NA * 5 -150 5 0 * AG 1410 1.4 .0 9.9 C. ND * 5 0 5 150 * AG 1660 1.1 .0 9.9 D. NE * 4 150 4 450 * AG 1660 1.0 .0 9.6 E. SF * -4 450 -4 150 * AG 1400 1.0 .0 9.6 F. SA * -5 150 -5 0 * AG 1300 1.4 .0 9.9 G. SD * -5 0 -5 -150 * AG 1240 1.1 .0 9.9 H. SE * -4 -150 -4 -450 * AG 1240 1.0 .0 9.6 I. WF * 450 4 150 4 * AG 400 1.0 .0 9.6 J. WA * 150 4 0 4 * AG 310 1.6 .0 9.9 K. WD * 0 4 -150 4 * AG 620 1.7 .0 9.9 L. WE * -150 4 -450 4 * AG 620 1.0 .0 9.6 M. EF * -450 -4 -150 -4 * AG 780 1.0 .0 9.6 N. EA * -150 -5 0 -5 * AG 450 1.6 .0 9.9 O. ED * 0 -5 150 -5 * AG 610 1.7 .0 9.9 P. EE * 150 -4 450 -4 * AG 610 1.0 .0 9.6 Q. NL * 0 -150 0 0 * AG 140 1.2 .0 9.9 R. SL * 0 150 0 0 * AG 100 1.2 .0 9.9 S. WL * 150 0 0 0 * AG 90 1.6 .0 9.9 T. EL * -150 0 0 0 * AG 330 1.6 .0 9.9 CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 2 Page 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Glassell&Walnut.txt JOB: 89. Glassell and Walnut RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide III. RECEPTOR LOCATIONS * COORDINATES RECEPTOR * X Y Z 1. NE * 12 8 1.8 2. SE * 12 -12 1.8 3. SW * -12 -12 1.8 4. NW * -12 8 1.8 IV. MODEL RESULTS (WORST CASE WIND ANGLE ) * * PRED * CONC/LINK * BRG * CONC * (PPM) RECEPTOR * (DEG) * (PPM) * A B C D E F G H 1. NE * 265. * 6.1 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * 353. * 6.1 * .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3. SW * 6. * 6.1 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .2 .0 .0 4. NW * 174. * 6.1 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .0 * CONC/LINK * (PPM) RECEPTOR * I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1. NE * .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3. SW * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 4. NW * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Haster_GeneAutry.txt CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 1 JOB: 24. Haster & Gene Autry RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide I. SITE VARIABLES U= 1.0 M/S Z0= 175. CM ALT= 0. BRG= WORST CASE VD= .0 CM/S CLAS= 7 VS= .0 CM/S MIXH= 1000. M AMB= 5.8 PPM SIGTH= 5. DEGREES TEMP= 15.0 DEGREE II. LINK VARIABLES LINK * LINK COORDINATES * EF H W DESCRIPTION * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * TYPE VPH (G/MI) A. NF * 9 -450 9 -150 * AG 2270 1.0 .0 16.8 B. NA * 14 -150 14 0 * AG 2010 1.4 .0 21.6 C. ND * 14 0 14 150 * AG 1950 1.2 .0 10.8 D. NE * 9 150 9 450 * AG 1950 1.0 .0 16.8 E. SF * -9 450 -9 150 * AG 1590 1.0 .0 16.8 F. SA * -14 150 -14 0 * AG 1340 1.4 .0 21.6 G. SD * -14 0 -14 -150 * AG 2020 1.2 .0 10.8 H. SE * -9 -150 -9 -450 * AG 2020 1.0 .0 16.8 I. WF * 450 9 150 9 * AG 2010 .9 .0 16.8 J. WA * 150 14 0 14 * AG 1280 1.4 .0 21.6 K. WD * 0 14 -150 14 * AG 1680 1.1 .0 10.8 L. WE * -150 9 -450 9 * AG 1680 .9 .0 16.8 M. EF * -450 -11 -150 -11 * AG 1510 .9 .0 20.4 N. EA * -150 -14 0 -14 * AG 1200 1.4 .0 21.6 O. ED * 0 -14 150 -14 * AG 1730 1.1 .0 14.4 P. EE * 150 -11 450 -11 * AG 1730 .9 .0 20.4 Q. NL * 0 -150 0 0 * AG 260 1.4 .0 9.9 R. SL * 0 150 0 0 * AG 250 1.4 .0 9.9 S. WL * 150 0 0 0 * AG 730 1.4 .0 9.9 T. EL * -150 0 0 0 * AG 310 1.4 .0 9.9 CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 2 Page 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Haster_GeneAutry.txt JOB: 24. Haster & Gene Autry RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide III. RECEPTOR LOCATIONS * COORDINATES RECEPTOR * X Y Z 1. NE * 28 28 1.8 2. SE * 28 -28 1.8 3. SW * -28 -28 1.8 4. NW * -28 28 1.8 IV. MODEL RESULTS (WORST CASE WIND ANGLE ) * * PRED * CONC/LINK * BRG * CONC * (PPM) RECEPTOR * (DEG) * (PPM) * A B C D E F G H 1. NE * 187. * 6.1 * .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * 344. * 6.1 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3. SW * 79. * 6.1 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 4. NW * 164. * 6.1 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 * CONC/LINK * (PPM) RECEPTOR * I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1. NE * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3. SW * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 4. NW * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Lewis_Katella.txt CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 1 JOB: 33. Lewis and Katella RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide I. SITE VARIABLES U= 1.0 M/S Z0= 175. CM ALT= 0. BRG= WORST CASE VD= .0 CM/S CLAS= 7 VS= .0 CM/S MIXH= 1000. M AMB= 5.8 PPM SIGTH= 5. DEGREES TEMP= 15.0 DEGREE II. LINK VARIABLES LINK * LINK COORDINATES * EF H W DESCRIPTION * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * TYPE VPH (G/MI) A. NF * 4 -450 4 -150 * AG 1440 .9 .0 9.6 B. NA * 4 -150 4 0 * AG 1190 1.8 .0 9.9 C. ND * 4 0 4 150 * AG 1280 1.8 .0 9.9 D. NE * 4 150 4 450 * AG 1280 .9 .0 9.6 E. SF * -4 450 -4 150 * AG 1610 .9 .0 9.6 F. SA * -4 150 -4 0 * AG 1230 1.8 .0 9.9 G. SD * -4 0 -4 -150 * AG 1050 1.8 .0 9.9 H. SE * -4 -150 -4 -450 * AG 1050 .9 .0 9.6 I. WF * 450 7 150 7 * AG 3370 .9 .0 16.8 J. WA * 150 9 0 9 * AG 2890 1.4 .0 14.4 K. WD * 0 9 -150 9 * AG 3720 1.2 .0 10.8 L. WE * -150 7 -450 7 * AG 3720 .9 .0 16.8 M. EF * -450 -7 -150 -7 * AG 2630 .9 .0 16.8 N. EA * -150 -9 0 -9 * AG 2210 1.3 .0 14.4 O. ED * 0 -9 150 -9 * AG 3000 1.2 .0 10.8 P. EE * 150 -7 450 -7 * AG 3000 .9 .0 16.8 Q. NL * 0 -150 0 0 * AG 250 1.6 .0 9.9 R. SL * 0 150 0 0 * AG 380 1.6 .0 9.9 S. WL * 150 0 0 0 * AG 480 1.3 .0 9.9 T. EL * -150 0 0 0 * AG 420 1.3 .0 9.9 CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 2 Page 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Lewis_Katella.txt JOB: 33. Lewis and Katella RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide III. RECEPTOR LOCATIONS * COORDINATES RECEPTOR * X Y Z 1. NE * 8 19 1.8 2. SE * 8 -19 1.8 3. SW * -8 -19 1.8 4. NW * -8 19 1.8 IV. MODEL RESULTS (WORST CASE WIND ANGLE ) * * PRED * CONC/LINK * BRG * CONC * (PPM) RECEPTOR * (DEG) * (PPM) * A B C D E F G H 1. NE * 185. * 6.5 * .0 .2 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * 355. * 6.5 * .0 .1 .2 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3. SW * 5. * 6.4 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .2 .1 .0 4. NW * 175. * 6.4 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .2 .0 * CONC/LINK * (PPM) RECEPTOR * I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1. NE * .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3. SW * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 4. NW * .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Amendment to the Platinum Triangle MLUP Caline Results Ambient CO For Source Receptor Area 17 AQMD Projected CO Concentrations Year One Hour Year Eight Hour 2015 5.8 2015 3.9 Ambient 2020 5.8 2020 3.9 2030 5.8 2030 3.9 1 hr/8hr deterioration 70% 33. Lewis and Katella 6.5 4.6 50. State College and Gateway Center 6.3 4.4 89. Glassell and Walnut 6.1 4.3 24. Haster & Gene Autry 6.1 4.3 9:59 AM 1/6/2010 Results-CO CL4v9.3_New.xls ---PAGE BREAK--- StateCollege_Gateway.txt CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 1 JOB: 50. State College and Gateway Center RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide I. SITE VARIABLES U= 1.0 M/S Z0= 175. CM ALT= 0. BRG= WORST CASE VD= .0 CM/S CLAS= 7 VS= .0 CM/S MIXH= 1000. M AMB= 5.8 PPM SIGTH= 5. DEGREES TEMP= 15.0 DEGREE II. LINK VARIABLES LINK * LINK COORDINATES * EF H W DESCRIPTION * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * TYPE VPH (G/MI) A. NF * 7 -450 7 -150 * AG 1590 .9 .0 16.8 B. NA * 7 -150 7 0 * AG 1510 1.3 .0 10.8 C. ND * 7 0 7 150 * AG 1620 1.0 .0 10.8 D. NE * 7 150 7 450 * AG 1620 .9 .0 16.8 E. SF * -9 450 -9 150 * AG 1570 .9 .0 16.8 F. SA * -13 150 -13 0 * AG 1170 1.3 .0 18.0 G. SD * -13 0 -13 -150 * AG 2240 1.1 .0 10.8 H. SE * -9 -150 -9 -450 * AG 2240 .9 .0 16.8 I. WF * 450 4 150 4 * AG 1780 1.0 .0 9.6 J. WA * 150 4 0 4 * AG 620 1.8 .0 9.9 K. WD * 0 4 -150 4 * AG 280 1.1 .0 9.9 L. WE * -150 4 -450 4 * AG 280 1.0 .0 9.6 M. EF * -450 -4 -150 -4 * AG 140 1.0 .0 9.6 N. EA * -150 -4 0 -4 * AG 80 1.5 .0 9.9 O. ED * 0 -4 150 -4 * AG 940 1.8 .0 9.9 P. EE * 150 -4 450 -4 * AG 940 1.0 .0 9.6 Q. NL * 0 -150 0 0 * AG 80 1.3 .0 9.9 R. SL * 0 150 0 0 * AG 400 1.3 .0 9.9 S. WL * 150 0 0 0 * AG 1160 1.8 .0 9.9 T. EL * -150 0 0 0 * AG 60 1.5 .0 9.9 CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL JUNE 1989 VERSION PAGE 2 Page 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- StateCollege_Gateway.txt JOB: 50. State College and Gateway Center RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE) POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide III. RECEPTOR LOCATIONS * COORDINATES RECEPTOR * X Y Z 1. NE * 16 8 1.8 2. SE * 16 -8 1.8 3. SW * -25 -8 1.8 4. NW * -25 8 1.8 IV. MODEL RESULTS (WORST CASE WIND ANGLE ) * * PRED * CONC/LINK * BRG * CONC * (PPM) RECEPTOR * (DEG) * (PPM) * A B C D E F G H 1. NE * 186. * 6.2 * .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * 84. * 6.3 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3. SW * 85. * 6.3 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 4. NW * 95. * 6.2 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 * CONC/LINK * (PPM) RECEPTOR * I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1. NE * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2. SE * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .2 .0 .0 .0 .1 .0 3. SW * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .1 .0 4. NW * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .0 Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 2 Projected Future Year 1-hour CO Concentrations (ppm) Y E A R Monitoring Site Location 1999 2000 2010 2015 2020 1 Central LA 7 6.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 2 West LA 6 5.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 3 Hawthorne 10 9.6 7.3 7.3 7.3 4 Long Beach 7 6.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 6 Reseda 9 8.6 6.5 6.6 6.6 7 Burbank 9 8.6 6.5 6.6 6.6 8 Pasadena 9 8.6 6.5 6.6 6.6 9 Azusa 5 4.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 10 Pomona 10 9.6 7.3 7.3 7.3 11 Pico Rivera 7 6.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 12 Lynwood 19 18.2 13.8 13.8 13.9 12 Compton 19 18.2 13.8 13.8 13.9 13 Santa Clarita 7 6.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 16 La Habra 11 10.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 17 Anaheim* 8 7.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 18 Costa Mesa 8 7.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 19 El Toro 4 3.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 23 Rubidoux 7 6.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 23 Banning AP** 7 6.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 30 Palm Springs 3 2.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 34 San Bernardino 5 4.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 *Anaheim data recovery rate: 33.7% **Banning AP data recovery rate: 82.2% ---PAGE BREAK--- Table 3 Projected Future Year 8-hour CO Concentrations (ppm) Y E A R Monitoring Site Location 1999 2000 2010 2015 2020 1 Central LA 6.3 6.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 2 West LA 3.8 3.6 2.8 2.8 2.8 3 Hawthorne 8.4 8.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 4 Long Beach 5.4 5.2 3.9 3.9 3.9 6 Reseda 7.6 7.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 7 Burbank 9 8.6 6.5 6.6 6.6 8 Pasadena 6.6 6.3 4.8 4.8 4.8 9 Azusa 3.9 3.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 10 Pomona 6.7 6.4 4.9 4.9 4.9 11 Pico Rivera 5.6 5.4 4.1 4.1 4.1 12 Lynwood 11 10.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 12 Compton 11.7 11.2 8.5 8.5 8.5 13 Santa Clarita 3.6 3.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 16 La Habra 5.3 5.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 17 Anaheim* 5.3 5.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 18 Costa Mesa 6.4 6.1 4.7 4.7 4.7 19 El Toro 2.5 2.4 1.8 1.8 1.8 23 Rubidoux 4.4 4.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 23 Banning AP** 4.1 3.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 Palm Springs 1.8 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 34 San Bernardino 4 3.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 *Anaheim data recovery rate: 33.7% **Banning AP data recovery rate: 82.2% ---PAGE BREAK--- Title: Orange County - 2030 Version: Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov, 1 2006 Run Date: 9/4/2009 Scen Year: 2030- All Model years in the range 1986 to 2030 selected Season: Annual Area: Orange County Running Emissions (grams/mile) Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide (CO) Temperature: 60F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 0.667 1.126 1.367 1.364 4.983 15.485 1.038 Pollutant Name: PM10 Temperature: 60F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 0.013 0.031 0.033 0.099 0.158 0.015 0.026 Pollutant Name: PM10 (Tire Wear) Temperature: 60F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.022 0.009 0.004 0.009 Pollutant Name: PM10 (Break Wear) Temperature: 60F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.019 0.013 0.006 0.013 Pollutant Name: Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Temperature: 70F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 0.04 0.078 0.153 1.866 7.809 0.914 0.155 ---PAGE BREAK--- Pollutant Name: Total Organic Gases (ROG) Temperature: 85F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 0.023 0.041 0.058 0.241 0.675 2.247 0.056 Pollutant Name: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Temperature: 77F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 428.294 538.105 [PHONE REDACTED].306 1867.583 153.723 552.148 Pollutant Name: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Temperature: 85F Relative Humidity: 70% Speed MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 25 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.015 0.018 0.002 0.006 Starting Emissions (grams/trip) Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide (CO) Temperature: 60F Relative Humidity: All Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 5 0.13 0.224 0.622 1.133 3.147 3.365 0.335 10 0.258 0.443 1.229 2.22 6.166 4.329 0.644 20 0.502 0.865 2.395 4.255 11.82 6.162 1.235 30 0.733 1.265 3.501 6.107 16.963 7.866 1.791 40 0.952 1.643 4.544 7.774 21.595 9.443 2.311 50 1.157 2 5.527 9.257 25.715 10.89 2.795 60 1.349 2.335 6.447 10.556 29.323 12.209 3.244 120 2.103 3.647 9.594 8.945 24.847 16.315 4.539 180 1.485 2.595 7.023 9.206 25.574 12.254 3.424 240 1.607 2.815 7.607 9.476 26.324 13.364 3.683 300 1.716 3.008 8.124 9.755 27.098 14.385 3.914 360 1.81 3.177 8.574 10.042 27.896 15.318 4.118 420 1.89 3.319 8.956 10.338 28.718 16.162 4.295 480 1.956 3.436 9.27 10.643 29.565 16.918 4.444 540 2.009 3.527 9.517 10.956 30.435 17.585 4.565 600 2.047 3.593 9.696 11.278 31.328 18.163 4.659 660 2.071 3.633 9.808 11.608 32.246 18.653 4.726 720 2.081 3.648 9.852 11.947 33.188 19.055 4.765 ---PAGE BREAK--- Pollutant Name: PM10 Temperature: 60F Relative Humidity: All Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 5 0.001 0.001 0.001 0 0.001 0.007 0.001 10 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.006 0.002 20 0.002 0.005 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.005 0.003 30 0.003 0.007 0.006 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 40 0.004 0.009 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.006 50 0.005 0.011 0.009 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.008 60 0.006 0.013 0.011 0.004 0.005 0.003 0.009 120 0.01 0.021 0.018 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.014 180 0.011 0.024 0.02 0.005 0.007 0.008 0.016 240 0.012 0.026 0.022 0.005 0.007 0.011 0.018 300 0.013 0.028 0.024 0.005 0.007 0.013 0.019 360 0.013 0.029 0.025 0.006 0.007 0.014 0.02 420 0.014 0.031 0.026 0.006 0.007 0.016 0.021 480 0.014 0.032 0.027 0.006 0.008 0.017 0.022 540 0.015 0.033 0.028 0.006 0.008 0.018 0.022 600 0.015 0.033 0.028 0.006 0.008 0.019 0.023 660 0.015 0.034 0.029 0.006 0.008 0.019 0.023 720 0.015 0.034 0.029 0.007 0.009 0.019 0.023 Pollutant Name: Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Temperature: 70F Relative Humidity: All Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 5 0.042 0.099 0.597 0.205 0.835 0.154 0.181 10 0.045 0.105 0.634 0.309 1.258 0.193 0.197 20 0.051 0.115 0.7 0.492 2.001 0.263 0.226 30 0.056 0.124 0.757 0.641 2.606 0.32 0.251 40 0.059 0.132 0.804 0.756 3.074 0.365 0.271 50 0.062 0.138 0.842 0.837 3.404 0.398 0.287 60 0.065 0.142 0.87 0.884 3.597 0.419 0.297 120 0.07 0.154 0.943 0.891 3.623 0.422 0.318 180 0.07 0.155 0.943 0.888 3.609 0.418 0.319 240 0.069 0.154 0.936 0.883 3.589 0.411 0.316 300 0.069 0.152 0.925 0.876 3.562 0.403 0.313 360 0.067 0.149 0.909 0.867 3.527 0.393 0.307 420 0.066 0.146 0.888 0.857 3.486 0.382 0.301 480 0.064 0.142 0.863 0.845 3.437 0.368 0.293 540 0.062 0.137 0.834 0.832 3.382 0.353 0.284 600 0.06 0.131 0.8 0.816 3.319 0.337 0.274 660 0.057 0.125 0.762 0.799 3.25 0.318 0.262 720 0.054 0.118 0.719 0.78 3.173 0.298 0.248 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- Pollutant Name: Total Organic Gases (ROG) Temperature: 85F Relative Humidity: All Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 5 0.005 0.009 0.033 0.054 0.163 0.637 0.019 10 0.01 0.017 0.065 0.104 0.319 0.783 0.034 20 0.02 0.033 0.127 0.198 0.604 1.064 0.063 30 0.029 0.048 0.185 0.281 0.856 1.33 0.089 40 0.037 0.062 0.24 0.353 1.075 1.581 0.114 50 0.044 0.076 0.291 0.413 1.261 1.817 0.136 60 0.051 0.088 0.339 0.463 1.414 1.988 0.157 120 0.08 0.144 0.55 0.561 1.711 2.371 0.237 180 0.092 0.165 0.593 0.595 1.815 2.52 0.259 240 0.098 0.175 0.63 0.628 1.916 2.68 0.275 300 0.103 0.186 0.667 0.66 2.014 2.837 0.291 360 0.109 0.196 0.704 0.691 2.108 2.99 0.307 420 0.114 0.206 0.74 0.721 2.2 3.141 0.322 480 0.12 0.216 0.776 0.75 2.288 3.288 0.337 540 0.125 0.226 0.812 0.778 2.372 3.432 0.352 600 0.13 0.236 0.847 0.804 2.453 3.572 0.367 660 0.136 0.246 0.883 0.83 2.531 3.71 0.382 720 0.141 0.255 0.917 0.854 2.606 3.844 0.397 Pollutant Name: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Temperature: 77F Relative Humidity: 70% Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 5 12.21 15.367 21.663 2.852 3.038 13.326 14.537 10 13.709 17.262 24.532 5.688 6.06 15.525 16.504 20 17.207 21.681 31.144 11.312 12.053 19.843 21.019 30 21.372 26.939 38.921 16.874 17.978 24.053 26.305 40 26.203 33.035 47.862 22.372 23.836 28.156 32.363 50 31.701 39.969 57.967 27.807 29.627 32.151 39.193 60 37.866 47.742 69.237 33.179 35.351 36.039 46.796 120 88.224 111.159 159.552 56.432 60.126 53.502 107.307 180 100.144 126.187 181.329 66.67 71.034 57.729 121.972 240 112.044 141.189 203.022 76.304 81.298 61.707 136.569 300 123.925 156.164 224.629 85.333 90.919 65.437 151.098 360 135.787 171.112 246.152 93.758 99.896 68.92 165.559 420 147.629 186.034 267.59 101.579 108.228 72.154 179.952 480 159.452 200.93 288.942 108.796 115.918 75.14 194.278 540 171.256 215.799 310.21 115.409 122.963 77.878 208.535 600 183.041 230.641 331.392 121.417 129.364 80.368 222.725 660 194.806 245.457 352.49 126.821 135.122 82.611 236.847 720 206.551 260.246 373.503 131.62 140.236 84.605 250.901 ---PAGE BREAK--- Pollutant Name: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Temperature: 85F Relative Humidity: 70% Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0.001 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0.001 0 0.001 0 0 60 0 0 0.001 0 0.001 0.001 0 120 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 180 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 240 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 300 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 360 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 420 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 480 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 540 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 600 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 660 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 720 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 Hot Soak Emissions (grams/trip) Pollutant Name: Total Organic Gases (ROG) Temperature: 85F Relative Humidity: All Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 5 0.026 0.046 0.035 0.004 0.044 0.185 0.034 10 0.048 0.085 0.066 0.007 0.081 0.345 0.062 20 0.083 0.147 0.113 0.012 0.138 0.602 0.107 30 0.106 0.19 0.147 0.015 0.178 0.792 0.139 40 0.115 0.206 0.159 0.017 0.193 0.868 0.151 Hot soak results are scaled to reflect zero emissions for trip of less than 5 minutes (aboute 25% of in-use trips). Partial Day Diurnal Loss Emissions (grams/hour) Pollutant Name: Total Organic Gases (ROG) Temperature: All Relative Humidity: All Temp degF LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 60 0.02 0.039 0.038 0.001 0.001 0.138 0.031 70 0.031 0.059 0.057 0.002 0.002 0.306 0.049 77 0.039 0.074 0.072 0.002 0.003 0.407 0.063 85 0.056 0.103 0.1 0.003 0.004 0.563 0.088 Partial Day Resting Loss Emissions (grams/hour) Pollutant Name: Total Organic Gases (ROG) Temperature: All Relative Humidity: All Temp degF LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 60 0.012 0.026 0.026 0.001 0.001 0.054 0.019 70 0.014 0.04 0.041 0.001 0.001 0.104 0.028 77 0.017 0.049 0.05 0.002 0.001 0.165 0.035 85 0.025 0.069 0.071 0.002 0.002 0.3 0.052 ---PAGE BREAK--- Evaporative Running Loss Emissions (grams/minute) Pollutant Name: Total Organic Gases (ROG) Temperature: 85F Relative Humidity: All Time min LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL 1 0.009 0.23 0.253 0.071 0.753 0.005 0.123 2 0.007 0.118 0.13 0.036 0.385 0.038 0.064 3 0.008 0.083 0.092 0.025 0.263 0.055 0.047 4 0.009 0.067 0.074 0.02 0.203 0.066 0.039 5 0.01 0.058 0.063 0.017 0.167 0.073 0.035 10 0.012 0.04 0.043 0.011 0.095 0.088 0.027 15 0.013 0.035 0.038 0.01 0.073 0.093 0.025 20 0.013 0.034 0.036 0.009 0.063 0.097 0.024 25 0.014 0.033 0.036 0.009 0.057 0.099 0.024 30 0.014 0.033 0.036 0.009 0.058 0.1 0.024 35 0.014 0.033 0.036 0.009 0.058 0.101 0.024 40 0.014 0.034 0.036 0.009 0.058 0.101 0.024 45 0.014 0.034 0.036 0.009 0.059 0.102 0.024 50 0.014 0.034 0.037 0.009 0.059 0.103 0.024 55 0.014 0.034 0.037 0.009 0.059 0.103 0.025 60 0.014 0.034 0.037 0.009 0.06 0.104 0.025 ---PAGE BREAK--- Summary of Emission Rates Running Emissions (lbs/mile) Starting Emissions (lbs/trip) Hot Soak Emissions (lbs/trip) Partial Day Diurnal Loss Emissions (lbs/hour) Partial Day Resting Loss Emissions (lbs/hour) Evaporative Resting Loss Emissions (lbs/minute) Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0.002 0.010 Particulate Matter (PM10) 0.000 0.000 Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) 0.000 0.001 Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.003 0.001 0.000 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1.217 0.428 Sulfur Oxide (SO2) 0.000 0.000 Hot Soak: Assumes 20 minutes Diurnal Loss Assumes 16 hours for partial day diurnal loss based on 16 hours between work end and next day start Resting Loss Assumes 8 hours for partial day resting loss, based on an 8-hour workday Evaportative Assumes 60 minutes for evaportative running loss emissions 1 gram = 0.0022046 lbs 0.0022046 ---PAGE BREAK--- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Existing Future No Project Platinum Triangle MLUP Difference Trips/day 84,416 243,060 443,263 200,203 VMT/day 655,113 1,715,669 3,135,398 1,419,729 average trip length 7.76 7.06 7.07 0.01 Running Emission Rate (lbs/mile) Emissions (lbs/day) CO 2.29E-03 1,499 3,926 7,175 3,249 PM10 1.06E-04 69 182 332 150 NOx 3.42E-04 224 586 1,071 485 ROG 1.23E-04 81 212 387 175 CO2 1.22E+00 797,446 2,088,425 3,816,612 1,728,187 SO2 1.32E-05 9 23 41 19 Emissions (lbs/day) Starting Emissions (lbs/trip) CO 9.80E-03 827 2,381 4,343 1,961 PM10 4.85E-05 4 12 21 10 NOx 6.46E-04 55 157 286 129 ROG 7.43E-04 63 181 329 149 CO2 4.28E-01 36,156 104,104 189,852 85,748 SO2 4.41E-06 0 1 2 1 Evaporative Emissions Emissions (lbs/day) VOC (HS) 2.36E-04 20 57 105 47 VOC (Dirunal) 3.10E-03 262 754 1,376 621 VOC (Resting) 9.17E-04 77 223 407 184 VOC (Running) 5.51E-05 5 13 24 11 Total ROG 364 1,048 1,911 863 P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\Transportation\EMFACWorksheetRegional.xls PB 1/6/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Total Emissions Emissions (lbs/day) CO 2,326 6,307 11,518 5,210 PM10 73 193 353 160 PM2.5 73 191 350 158 NOx 278 743 1,358 614 ROG 508 1,441 2,628 1,187 CO2 833,602 2,192,529 4,006,464 1,813,935 SO2 9 24 43 20 assumes PM2.5 is 99 percent of PM10 for mobile sources 1 Ton = 2,000 lbs Emissions (tons/year) CO 425 1,151 2,102 951 PM10 13 35 64 29 PM2.5 13 35 64 29 NOx 51 136 248 112 ROG 93 263 480 217 CO2 152,132 400,136 731,180 331,043 SO2 2 4 8 4 1 Ton = 0.9071847 Mtons Emissions (Mtons/year) CO 385 1,044 1,907 863 PM10 12 32 58 26 PM2.5 12 32 58 26 NOx 46 123 225 102 ROG 84 238 435 197 CO2 138,012 362,998 663,315 300,317 SO2 1 4 7 3 convert to MMTons 0.14 0.36 0.66 0.30 Assumptions SCAQMD. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Appendix Table A9-5-F, Input Assumptions to Determine Speed by Trip Type. County Average Speeds (miles per hour) 1987 2010 2030 Orange County 27.0 26.0 25.1 Orange County (Area 1) CO 60 NOx 70 ROG/VOC 85 Based on SCAQMD. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Table A9-5-I, Estimating Temperatures Needed to Choose Composite P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\Transportation\EMFACWorksheetRegional.xls PB 1/6/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- Greenhouse Gas Emissions CO2 77 Based on annual average temperature (WRRC) Starting emissions: Hot Soak: Assumes 20 minutes Diurnal Loss Assumes 16 hours for partial day diurnal loss based on 16 hours between work end and next day start Resting Loss Assumes 8 hours for partial day resting loss, based on an 8-hour workday Evaportative Assumes 60 minutes for evaportative running loss emissions assumes that cars rest for an average of 480 minutes between trips, based on an 8 hour workday (60 minutes/hour * 8 hours = 480 minutes) P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\Transportation\EMFACWorksheetRegional.xls PB 1/6/2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 1 BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK VERSION 5.0 – MAY 9, 2008 THE FRAMEWORK SUPPORTS YOUR EFFORTS NOW This Best Practices Framework offers suggestions for local action in ten Climate Leadership Opportunity Areas (see right), both in agency operations and the community at large. An agency can use specific best practice suggestions for stand-alone programs or as part of a broad-based climate action plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The suggestions are designed to reflect the variation among cities and counties and offer a variety of options ranging from simple steps to more complex undertakings. YOU CAN START NOW We encourage you to review the Framework and get started on those actions that make sense for your agency. Many ideas in the Framework can be implemented immediately, even if you don’t have a climate action plan. For example, you can audit agency buildings and operations to find ways to save energy and money, such as by replacing lights, inefficient HVAC systems or water pumps. Buying climate-friendly products are another option. Check the Framework for ideas you haven’t thought of – if it fits your agency or community, you can start today. DEVELOP A BROAD-BASED CLIMATE ACTION PLAN Strategies for reducing greenhouse gases often overlap more than one program area. For example, many practices that improve energy efficiency also can apply to green building and water conservation. Strategies to promote efficient transportation are related to land use and community design. You can use the Framework to help identify these overlaps and start developing a broad-based climate action plan for your community. SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK The Best Practices Framework is an evolving resource document. Over time, we will include new actions that reflect innovation at the local level. If your city or county has additional suggestions for best practices to share, please send them to us, along with any background information available. Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] If you would like to receive information about climate change resources and updates from CCAN, please visit www.ca-ilg.org/climatelistserve to be added to the CCAN listserve. Climate Leadership Opportunity Areas 1. Energy Efficiency and Conservation 2. Water and Wastewater Systems 3. Green Building 4. Waste Reduction and Recycling 5. Climate-Friendly Purchasing 6. Renewable Energy and Low-Carbon Fuels 7. Efficient Transportation 8. Land Use and Community Design 9. Storing and Offsetting Carbon Emissions 10. Promoting Community and Individual Action The California Climate Action Network provides information, tools and resources in support of local governments’ efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in their communities. The California Climate Action Network is a program of the Institute for Local Government, the non-profit research and education affiliate of the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties. Visit the California Climate Action Network Web site at www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 2 Energy Efficiency and Conservation GOAL BEST PRACTICE Energy conservation and efficiency in agency buildings and equipment. See also Green Building section for additional energy options. Audit/evaluation • Audit major agency buildings and facilities to quantify energy use and identify opportunities for energy savings through efficiency and conservation measures. • Conduct retro-commissioning studies of major agency building HVAC and lighting systems. • Benchmark energy use of major agency buildings. Building retrofitting and retro-commissioning • Develop an implementation schedule to implement no cost/low cost opportunities. • Develop implementation plan for capital intensive energy retrofits. • Develop implementation plan to achieve facility Energy Star rating of 60- 75 or greater, where feasible. • Implement retro-commissioning improvements as recommended in studies. Operations/protocols • Establish energy efficiency protocols for building custodial and cleaning services. • Establish facility energy efficiency policy for employees that provides guidelines, instructions and requirements for efficient use of the facility such as by turning lights and computers off, thermostat use, etc. • Implement off-peak scheduling of pumps, motors and other energy intensive machinery where feasible. • Incorporate energy management software or other methods to monitor energy use in agency buildings. Standards/commissioning • Develop commissioning and retro-commissioning standards for new and renovated buildings. • Develop and implement shading requirements for agency and community parking lots, buildings and other facilities to reduce the urban heat island effect. • Develop and implement a continuous commissioning plan. • Integrate energy efficiency, conservation, solar and other renewable energy technologies into new agency facilities. Work with energy provider • Work with energy provider to access utility’s technical assistance and financial incentives. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 3 Energy Efficiency and Conservation GOAL BEST PRACTICE Reduce energy use for traffic signal and street lighting system. • Replace incandescent traffic and crosswalk lights with energy-efficient light-emitting diodes (LEDs). • Replace incandescent and mercury vapor street and parking lot lights with energy efficient alternatives. Outreach to business and residents to promote energy efficiency in the community. • Encourage community businesses to conduct energy audits. • Work with energy provider to encourage commercial sector to install energy efficient exterior lighting that is appropriate for the location and use, considering security versus decorative lighting. • Require energy audits and/or retrofits, such as at time of sale of commercial and residential properties. • Work with energy provider to promote use of financial incentives to assist residential and commercial customers improve energy efficiency. • Promote and reward energy efficiency efforts of local retail businesses. • Collaborate with local retail businesses to encourage residents to purchase energy efficient products. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 4 Water and Wastewater Systems GOAL BEST PRACTICE Reduce energy use in water, irrigation and waste water systems (either operated by agency or by another agency or private company). See also Green Buildings section for additional options. • Audit agency’s water and waste-water pumps and motors to identify most and least efficient equipment. • Develop and implement a motor/pump efficiency cycling schedule to use most efficient water or waste-water motors/pumps first and least efficient ones last. • Replace least efficient water/wastewater motors and pumps with more efficient units. • Work with agency or company that provides water and waste water service to implement an audit, cycling and equipment replacement program for water and waste water pumps and motors. • Implement methane capture for energy production at wastewater treatment plants. • Use recycled water for agency facilities and operations, including parks and medians, where appropriate. • Retrofit existing agency buildings and facilities to meet standards for the LEED Standards Rating Systems for Existing Buildings (EB) or Commercial Interiors (CI). • Require dual plumbing for use of recycled water for new commercial and/or residential developments. Reduce water use in agency operations and in the community. See also Green Building section for additional options. Agency operations • Assess, maintain and repair existing plumbing fixtures, pipes, and irrigation systems in all agency buildings and facilities to minimize water use, including building and parking lot landscaping, public rest rooms and parks, golf courses and other recreational facilities. • Upgrade and retrofit agency plumbing and irrigation systems with state- of-the-art water conserving technology. • Implement all feasible water efficiency strategies included in the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource Efficient Land Use in all agency parks, landscaping and in new developments. Community at large • Adopt water efficiency principles similar to the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource Efficient Land Use for new and existing residential and commercial developments. • Implement water conservation and reclamation programs to reduce energy use associated with water delivery. • Require water efficiency audits at point of sale for commercial and residential properties. • Adopt retrofit program to encourage or require installation of water conservation measures in existing businesses and homes. • Partner with water provider to adopt water conservation measures. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 5 Green Building GOAL BEST PRACTICE Establish minimum levels of energy efficiency and green building standards for agency buildings and facilities. See also Energy Efficiency and Conservation section for more options. • Require that agency buildings have a performance equivalent to an Energy Star rating of at least 60-75 (as described in the LEED-E3 reference guide), where feasible. • Require all new agency buildings and facilities to meet at least LEED Silver certification standards. • Require renovated agency buildings and facilities and those using agency funds or other financial support to meet at least LEED Silver certification standards. Establish and implement minimum levels of energy efficiency and green building standards for commercial and residential buildings. See also Energy Efficiency and Conservation section for more options. • Require new residential and commercial construction to exceed Title 24 energy efficiency standards to extent permitted by law. • Provide technical assistance, financial assistance, and other significant incentives to private development projects that meet or exceed LEED Silver certification standards for commercial buildings. • Adopt and implement a local green building ordinance or program setting minimum standards of LEED Silver certification for new commercial, industrial and high-rise residential building projects. • Adopt and implement a local green building ordinance or program to require new low-rise residential construction to meet minimum green building standards, such as Build It Green, California Green Builder, LEED, or a similar program. • Provide technical assistance, financial assistance, and other significant incentives to private development projects that meet or exceed specified standards under green building programs such as Build It Green, California Green Builder, LEED, or a similar program. • Work with commercial developers to incorporate materials and furnishings made from recycled content. Implement sustainable landscaping. See also Water and Wastewater section for more options. • Develop and implement sustainable landscaping standards for public agency facilities to reduce water consumption. • Develop and implement sustainable landscaping standards for new commercial construction and renovation to reduce water consumption. • Develop and implement sustainable landscaping standards for new residential construction and renovation to reduce water consumption. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 6 Waste Reduction and Recycling GOAL BEST PRACTICE Enhance existing waste reduction and recycling activities at agency buildings and in the community. • Institute a comprehensive waste reduction and recycling program in agency offices and facilities. • Institute a partnership with other public agency offices located within the jurisdiction for waste reduction and recycling at those facilities. • Adopt a partnership with local schools for waste reduction and recycling. • Increase opportunities for e-waste and hazardous waste recycling by residents and businesses. • Educate the community about “buy recycled” opportunities. • Evaluate current community recycling infrastructure relative to future population growth and waste generation. • Include provisions and incentives for new recycling infrastructure and facilities to accommodate growth, in land use planning and zoning. Implement source reduction, recycling and resource recovery programs for waste organic material. Produce compost, mulch, energy and fuels from organic waste stream. • Audit agency facilities to identify opportunities to increase material recovery and beneficial use of organic material. • Establish an organic material recovery program for green waste from agency parks and facility landscaping. • Establish a program to use the maximum amount as possible of organic waste generated within the jurisdiction to produce compost and/or biofuel, including use on agency parks and landscaping. • Establish incentives for residents to participate in green waste recycling programs. • Adopt a restaurant food waste collection program or ordinance. • Approve siting of composting facility within jurisdiction. Reduce office and commercial waste and increase recycling. • Adopt a program or ordinance to encourage or require recycling at multi- family apartments. • Adopt a program or ordinance to encourage or require recycling in the commercial/industrial sectors. • Adopt a program or ordinance to encourage or require waste audits and waste reduction plans for existing and/or new commercial developments. • Audit major waste generators and recommend strategies to reduce waste and increase recycling. • In partnership with the waste hauler(s) serving the commercial sector, institute a comprehensive waste reduction and recycling program with financial and other incentives to promote waste reduction and recycling for commercial/industrial waste generators. • Partner with the California Integrated Waste Management Board to encourage businesses and residents to participate in CalMax (California Materials Exchange) or a similar program. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 7 Waste Reduction and Recycling GOAL BEST PRACTICE Source reduction, recycling and resource recovery programs for construction and demolition material. • Require all agency demolition projects to incorporate de-construction and construction and demolition waste recycling or recovery practices. • Adopt a program or ordinance to reduce, reuse and recycle community construction and demolition waste. • Adopt a “deconstruction” program or ordinance to salvage and reuse materials in all community remodeling projects. • Adopt and implement a policy to require use of rubberized asphalt concrete (RAC) for streets and roads. • Adopt and implement a policy to require use recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) for streets and roads. • Implement a policy to use RAP for commercial and community parking lots, where feasible. • Encourage schools and other public agencies to use RAP for parking lots, where feasible. • Establish a program or ordinance that results in 100 percent in-place recycling of asphalt concrete. • Establish a program or ordinance that results in recycling of 100 percent of all Portland cement and asphalt concrete. Decrease carbon footprint of jurisdiction’s waste and recycling collection system. • Work with solid waste and recycling collection providers to calculate carbon footprint of collection system. • Work with solid waste and recycling collection providers to reduce collection system footprint. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 8 Climate-Friendly Purchasing GOAL BEST PRACTICE Commit to purchasing specific products and goods that are climate-friendly. See also Waste Reduction and Recycling and Green Building sections. • Adopt and implement a procurement policy that establishes standards for climate-friendly products and requires agency purchases to meet such standards as: o New equipment meets Energy Star or comparable energy efficiency standards. o Computer purchases meet the highest feasible EPEAT certification level. o Office paper purchases (copy paper, printer paper, writing pads, stationery, envelopes and business cards) contain a minimum specified percentage of post consumer recycled content. o Other paper purchases (paper towels, toilet paper, napkins and similar items) contain a minimum percentage of post consumer recycled content. o Carpeting and other furnishings contain a minimum percentage of recycled content. o Plastic items (refuse and recycling receptacles, decking, parking lot barriers, furniture, etc.) contain recycled content. o Oil and oil-related products contain recycled content. o Products certified by either GreenSeal or EcoLogo, as long as they cost no more than an agency-determined percentage above the price of non- certified products. • Create an interdepartmental team to 1) promote policy implementation, 2) track policy adherence, and 3) suggest additional items to be included in the agency’s climate-friendly purchasing program, including such tasks as: o Reviewing and analyzing current (baseline) purchasing by major product categories. o Prioritizing product categories in terms of greenhouse gas emissions implications and improvement potential. o Reviewing policies, procedures, organization/staffing for implementation barriers. o Developing multi-year implementation schedule based on priorities, difficulty, upcoming solicitations. o Reporting achievements under the policy to policy makers and the public annually. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 9 Climate-Friendly Purchasing GOAL BEST PRACTICE Purchase services that are climate-friendly. • Require service providers to follow climate-friendly practices, or provide a preference in selecting and contracting with service providers to those that follow climate-friendly practices. • Provide incentives for the use of alternative fuel vehicles for agency contracts for services involving vehicles (buses, waste hauling and recycling, construction, etc.). • Ensure that the highest feasible percentage of annual expenditures for contract services is with companies registered with the California Climate Action Registry or its successor. Give a preference to climate- friendly vendors. • Provide a price preference to product vendors that follow climate-friendly practices, including use of recycled content materials, Energy Star and EPEAT materials and equipment, as well as alternative fuel vehicles. • Provide a price preference to product vendors that inventory and register their greenhouse gas emissions with the California Climate Action Registry or its successor and that report their verified greenhouse gas emissions within the jurisdiction. Community education about climate friendly procurement. • Educate the public about climate friendly procurement opportunities. • Work with the business community to educate them about climate friendly procurement opportunities. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 10 Renewable Energy and Low-Carbon Fuels GOAL BEST PRACTICE Promote agency use of fuel efficient and alternative fuel vehicles to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. See also Efficient Transportation section • Convert vehicles owned, leased or operated by the agency to run on alternative fuels or other non-fossil fuel based technology that significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions. • Install bicycle racks, showers and other amenities at agency facilities to promote bicycle use by agency employees and visitors. Promote methane recovery programs and projects. See also Waste Reduction and Recycling section. • For jurisdictions that own or operate one or more landfills, recover and use the maximum feasible amount of recoverable methane gas from the landfill to produce electricity, fuel co-generation facilities, and/or produce CNG for use in alternative fuel vehicles. • For jurisdictions that do not own or operate landfills, calculate the methane emissions associated with the disposal of waste generated within the community. • For jurisdictions that do not own or operate landfills, enter into partnerships or agreements with waste disposal agencies or companies to ensure that the maximum feasible amount of methane is recovered for waste-to-energy purposes. • Install digesters and other technologies at wastewater treatment facilities to produce methane and other biofuels. Promote the use of renewable sources of energy. • Install photovoltaic systems or other renewable sources of energy on agency facilities OR enter into power purchasing agreements to meet at least 10-25 percent of the electrical energy requirements of facilities owned, leased or operated by the agency. • Adopt policy or program that offers incentives, such as streamlined permitting system or fee waivers, to encourage installation of photovoltaic systems on new or existing residential and commercial buildings. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 11 Efficient Transportation GOAL BEST PRACTICE Implement transportation planning processes that reduce automobile dependency. • Update transportation models and surveys to capture data for and accurately reflect all modes of transportation. • Make reductions in vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) a high-priority criteria in evaluation of policy, program and project alternatives. • Implement transportation planning procedures that consider demand management solutions equally with strategies to increase capacity. • Include all significant impacts (costs and benefits) in benefit-cost assessment of alternatives, including non-market or indirect impacts, such as improving mobility options or reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Improve infrastructure and Transportation Systems Management (TSM). See also Land Use and Community Design section. • Implement Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for surveillance and traffic control, such as signals, transit and emergency signal priority, and other traffic flow management techniques, to improve traffic flow and reduce vehicle idling. • Implement programs to reduce "incident-based" traffic congestion, such as expedited clearing of accidents from major traffic arteries, airport traffic mitigation, etc. • Develop infrastructure improvements such as HOV/HOT lanes and dedicated bus rapid transit right-of-ways. Reduce Idling. • Adopt and implement a policy requiring limitations on idling for commercial vehicles, construction vehicles, buses and other similar vehicles, beyond state law, where feasible. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 12 Efficient Transportation GOAL BEST PRACTICE Promote alternatives to single- occupant auto commuting. See also Land Use and Community Design section. Agency operations • Provide agency employees with incentives to use alternatives to single- occupant auto commuting, such as parking cash-out, flexible schedules, transit incentives, bicycle facilities, ridesharing services and subsidies, and telecommuting. • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from municipal fleet operations by purchasing or leasing high MPG, low carbon fuel or hybrid vehicles, or by using an external car sharing program in lieu of city/county fleet. Community • Work with major employers in the community to offer incentives and services to increase the use of alternatives to single-occupant auto commuting (voluntary commute trip reduction programs). • Encourage and facilitate the development of car-sharing and other services that reduce the need to own a personal motor vehicle. • Develop and implement voluntary agreements for commute trip reduction programs for new commercial developments. • Provide parking preferences in public lots, garages and on-street spaces for residents who rideshare or use low-carbon fuel vehicles. • Implement variable (“congestion”) pricing and other pricing mechanisms for parking facilities, to provide incentives and discourage single- occupant-vehicle and peak travel. • Dedicate revenues from fees and tolls to promote alternative transportation modes. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 13 Land Use and Community Design GOAL BEST PRACTICE Create communities and neighborhoods that are attractive, safe and convenient for walkers and bicyclists. See also Efficient Transportation section. • Assess and report on pedestrian and bicycle conditions in existing communities and neighborhoods. • Develop a community-wide pedestrian and bicycle plan and capital program that maximizes the potential for residents to walk or bicycle within and between neighborhoods. • Require new commercial developments to install bicycle parking facilities and other cyclist amenities at a level commensurate with the number of employees or square footage. • Adopt and implement a community-wide pedestrian and bicycle plan. • Provide bicycle access to transit services on major transit corridors and other routes that may attract bicyclists, such as routes serving schools and colleges. • Install traffic calming devices and other measures to reduce traffic speeds and volumes and increase the safety and feasibility of bicycling and walking. • Implement design standards that require streets and sidewalks to be designed for multi-modal mobility and access, including walking and bicycling, to ensure that new development is designed, sited and oriented to facilitate pedestrian, bicycle and other mobility and access. Orient new development to capitalize on transit system investments and services. See also Efficient Transportation section. • Provide incentives and remove zoning and other barriers to mixed-use and higher intensity development at transit nodes and along transit corridors (existing and planned). • Require new development at transit nodes and along transit corridors to meet planning and design standards to generate, attract, and facilitate transit ridership as a condition of approval. • Integrate park-and-ride lots with multi-use facilities. Adopt policies that promote compact and efficient development in new and existing communities. See also Efficient Transportation and Green Building sections. • Inventory infill development sites. Plan, zone and provide incentives for new development and renovation of existing uses in identified infill areas. • Adopt and enforce land use ordinances and regulations that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Examples include prioritizing mixed uses and infill development, and providing more transportation and housing choices. • Require new housing and mixed use developments be built to the LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND) standard or its equivalent. • Provide expedited application processing for development projects that meet climate change response policies. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 14 Land Use and Community Design GOAL BEST PRACTICE Incorporate greenhouse gas emissions considerations into the General Plan and environmental review process. See also Efficient Transportation section. • Include a greenhouse gas reduction plan in the General Plan, or include within the General Plan a requirement for development and adoption of a greenhouse gas reduction plan. • Analyze impact of greenhouse gas emissions from land use and transportation sectors in the EIR prepared in connection with general plan updates. • Amend local CEQA guidelines to explain how analysis of greenhouse gas emissions will be treated, such as thresholds of significance. [NOTE: the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association has published recommendations at www.capcoa.org.] • Analyze impacts of development projects on safety, availability and use of alternative transportation in CEQA documents. Establish planning processes that encourage reducing greenhouse gas emissions. See also Efficient Transportation section. • Develop and adopt a preferred “climate-friendly” land use and transportation scenario for future development to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through software tools such as the PLACE3S system developed by the California Energy Commission. • Incorporate land use and transportation policies in the General Plan, capital improvement program and other planning and spending documents, codes and ordinances to reflect the preferred “climate- friendly” land use and transportation scenario. • Implement a regional blueprint or other long-range, regional planning process to assess the climate impacts of future growth and develop a preferred regional climate-friendly growth scenario. • Involve emergency responders early and consistently in development of growth plans. Increase transportation choices. See also Efficient Transportation section. • Establish land use policies that support multimodal transportation systems and connection of modes to each other. • Require sidewalks in all new developments. • Plan and permit road networks of neighborhood-scaled streets (generally 2 or 4 lanes) with high levels of connectivity and short blocks. • Zone for concentrated activity centers around transit service. • Coordinate planning and project approval procedures to increase collaboration between land use and transportation planning staff. • Cluster freight facilities near ports, airports and rail terminals. • Coordinate with regional efforts and neighboring jurisdictions to plan for and accommodate alternate modes. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 15 Storing and Offsetting Carbon Emissions GOAL BEST PRACTICE Preserve and enhance forests, parks, street trees, open space and other natural systems that act as carbon “sinks.” • Inventory existing trees on property owned or managed by the agency and implement a management system to preserve and enhance the existing urban forest. • Manage parks, open space, recreational facilities and other natural areas owned or operated by the agency to ensure the long-term health and viability of trees and other vegetation. • Develop and implement a community-wide urban forestry management and reforestation program to significantly increase the carbon storage potential of trees and other vegetation in the community. • Steer new development away from open space and agricultural lands that provide natural carbon storage. • Partner with other agencies and non-profit organizations to protect natural lands in and adjacent to the community through acquisition, conservation easements or other long-term mechanisms. Promote local sustainable agriculture to reduce carbon emissions associated with food production, processing, and transport. • Promote the purchase of local and organic produce through farmers markets and other measures. • Enact a local food purchase policy for agency food purchases. • Promote conservation tillage and other agricultural practices to retain carbon fixed in soils. Offset carbon emissions through carbon credits or allowances. • Audit agency-sponsored events and activities to determine greenhouse gas emissions associated with the event/activity. • Achieve carbon neutrality at agency-sponsored events and activities through conservation, efficiency, alternative transportation, and the purchase of third-party verified emission reductions to offset carbon emissions. • Achieve carbon neutrality for major agency operations through conservation, efficiency, alternative transportation, and the purchase of third-party verified emission reductions to offset carbon emissions. • Create incentives for community organizations and residents to reduce their carbon use including the purchase of third-party verified emission reductions. • Purchase and retire third-party verified emission reductions to offset community-wide carbon emissions. ---PAGE BREAK--- INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CALIFORNIA CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK - VERSION 5.0 MAY 9, 2008 www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange PAGE 16 Promoting Community and Individual Actions GOAL BEST PRACTICE Promote individual actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve natural systems that store carbon. • Survey businesses and residents to understand attitudes and behaviors related to climate change. • Include information on actions that individuals can take to address climate change in local agency mailings, websites, and other communications. • Develop a community climate change education initiative that enlists participation from schools, museums, service groups, business organizations (such as local Chambers of Commerce), neighborhood and homeowner associations, and other community partners. • Identify and allocate resources to implement a community climate change education initiative, and establish an implementation timeline not to exceed five years. • Initiate implementation of the education and action plan. • Provide programs and/or incentives to individuals, groups, and businesses that adopt practices that reduce their carbon footprint. Promote cooperation among agencies and communities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve natural systems that store carbon. • Participate in inter-agency and inter-jurisdictional meetings to share information about climate change and best practices to reduce carbon emissions. • Create an inter-agency local or regional climate action partnership and/or action plan with one or more sister agencies or neighboring jurisdictions. • Initiate the regional action plan. • Participate in the development of a regional blueprint or other long-range planning process to assess the climate impacts of future growth and develop a preferred climate-friendly growth scenario. • Initiate a Community Climate Action Partnership with a Global Sister Agency. Provide opportunities for public engagement that will support successful implementation of climate change actions. • Organize and promote community dialogues that educate residents about climate change and its possible impacts on the community. • Develop informational material for residents about climate change and opportunities for individual action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. • Use public involvement processes to develop recommendations from residents and businesses about the city or county’s climate change action plan and actions the agency is taking to respond to climate change, such as through green building, energy conservation, efficient transportation, and other actions. • Provide opportunities for interested residents to stay engaged after the initial planning to help monitor and assess ongoing efforts and recommend plan adaptations as needed. ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction GHG Emissions Summary From Urbemis2007 Year Adopted Amended Increase 2010 13,152 31,406 2011 22,202 53,014 2012 22,285 53,212 2013 22,284 53,209 2014 22,283 53,206 2015 22,282 53,204 2016 22,281 53,200 2017 22,194 52,994 2018 22,279 53,196 2019 22,279 53,195 2020 22,364 53,398 2021 22,276 53,188 2022 22,191 52,984 2023 22,191 52,984 2024 22,362 53,392 2025 22,276 53,188 2026 22,275 53,185 2027 22,275 53,185 2028 22,190 52,982 2029 22,275 53,185 2030 9,303 22,212 445,499 1,063,719 0 Conversion to CO2e Year Adopted Amended Increase 0 0 0 2010 13,191 31,500 0 2011 22,269 53,173 0 2012 22,352 53,372 0 2013 22,351 53,369 0 2014 22,350 53,366 0 2015 22,349 53,364 0 2016 22,348 53,360 0 2017 22,261 53,153 0 2018 22,346 53,356 0 2019 22,346 53,355 0 2020 22,431 53,558 0 2021 22,343 53,348 0 2022 22,258 53,143 0 2023 22,258 53,143 0 2024 22,429 53,552 0 2025 22,343 53,348 0 2026 22,342 53,345 0 2027 22,342 53,345 0 2028 22,257 53,141 0 2029 22,342 53,345 0 2030 9,331 22,279 0 Total By Phase 446,835 1,066,910 620,075 Average Annual Construction 22,342 53,346 31,004 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction GHG Emissions Summary Conversion to MTons of CO2e Year Adopted Amended Increase 0 0 0 2010 11,967 28,577 0 2011 20,202 48,238 0 2012 20,277 48,418 0 2013 20,276 48,415 0 2014 20,275 48,412 0 2015 20,275 48,411 0 2016 20,274 48,407 0 2017 20,194 48,220 0 2018 20,272 48,403 0 2019 20,272 48,402 0 2020 20,349 48,587 0 2021 20,269 48,396 0 2022 20,192 48,210 0 2023 20,192 48,210 0 2024 20,347 48,582 0 2025 20,269 48,396 0 2026 20,268 48,393 0 2027 20,268 48,393 0 2028 20,191 48,209 0 2029 20,268 48,393 0 2030 8,465 20,211 0 Total By Phase 405,362 967,885 562,522 Average Annual Construction 20,268 48,394 28,126 1 short ton (Ton) equals 0.9071847 metric tons (Mton) URBEMIS2007, Version 9.2.4. Assumes CO2 represents 99.6 percent of total CO2e emissions from motorgasoline and 99.7 percent of total from diesel CO2e while CH4, N2O, and Fluorinated Gases comprise the remaining percent (BAAQMD 2008). ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction GHG Emissions Summary - With Industrial From Urbemis2007 Year Total 0 2010 32,436 32,436 2011 54,754 54,754 2012 54,959 54,959 2013 54,953 54,953 2014 54,951 54,951 2015 54,947 54,947 2016 54,734 54,734 2017 54,942 54,942 2018 54,942 54,942 2019 54,942 54,942 2020 55,151 55,151 2021 54,934 54,934 2022 54,724 54,724 2023 54,724 54,724 2024 55,145 55,145 2025 54,934 54,934 2026 54,932 54,932 2027 54,932 54,932 2028 54,721 54,721 2029 54,932 54,932 2030 22,941 22,941 1,098,629 0 0 1,098,629 Conversion to CO2e Year 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 2010 32,533 0 0 32,533 2011 54,918 0 0 54,918 2012 55,124 0 0 55,124 2013 55,118 0 0 55,118 2014 55,116 0 0 55,116 2015 55,112 0 0 55,112 2016 54,898 0 0 54,898 2017 55,107 0 0 55,107 2018 55,107 0 0 55,107 2019 55,106 0 0 55,106 2020 55,316 0 0 55,316 2021 55,099 0 0 55,099 2022 54,888 0 0 54,888 2023 54,888 0 0 54,888 2024 55,310 0 0 55,310 2025 55,099 0 0 55,099 2026 55,097 0 0 55,097 2027 55,097 0 0 55,097 2028 54,885 0 0 54,885 2029 55,097 0 0 55,097 2030 23,010 0 0 23,010 Total By Phase 1,101,925 0 0 1,101,925 ---PAGE BREAK--- Construction GHG Emissions Summary - With Industrial Conversion to MTons of CO2e Year 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 2010 29,514 0 0 29,514 2011 49,821 0 0 49,821 2012 50,008 0 0 50,008 2013 50,002 0 0 50,002 2014 50,000 0 0 50,000 2015 49,997 0 0 49,997 2016 49,803 0 0 49,803 2017 49,992 0 0 49,992 2018 49,992 0 0 49,992 2019 49,992 0 0 49,992 2020 50,182 0 0 50,182 2021 49,985 0 0 49,985 2022 49,794 0 0 49,794 2023 49,794 0 0 49,794 2024 50,177 0 0 50,177 2025 49,985 0 0 49,985 2026 49,983 0 0 49,983 2027 49,983 0 0 49,983 2028 49,791 0 0 49,791 2029 49,983 0 0 49,983 2030 20,874 0 0 20,874 Total By Phase 999,650 0 0 999,650 1 short ton (Ton) equals 0.9071847 metric tons (Mton) URBEMIS2007, Version 9.2.4. Assumes CO2 represents 99.6 percent of total CO2e emissions from motorgasoline and 99.7 percent of total from diesel CO2e while CH4, N2O, and Fluorinated Gases comprise the remaining percent (BAAQMD 2008). ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future PTMLUP Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future PTMLUP Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future PTMLUP Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future PTMLUP Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft 2) Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft 2/Year) /Year) /Year) /Year) Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO 2e/Year e/Year e/Year e/Year Retail (Other Than Mall) 4,909,682 11.3 55,479,407 35,080,322 Office 14,340,522 16.8 240,920,770 152,337,214 Public Assembly 1,500,000 19.7 29,550,000 18,684,834 Mercantile 0 17.3 0 0 Total Commercial Total Commercial Total Commercial Total Commercial 20,750,204 20,750,204 20,750,204 20,750,204 65.1 65.1 65.1 65.1 325,950,176 325,950,176 325,950,176 325,950,176 206,102,371 206,102,371 206,102,371 206,102,371 Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year 103,051 103,051 103,051 103,051 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 564,664 564,664 564,664 564,664 Residential Residential Residential Residential Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft 2) Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft 2 2 2 2 /Year) /Year) /Year) /Year) Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO 2e/Year e/Year e/Year e/Year Residential 27,720,594 41.7 338,692,990 214,159,811 Total Residential Total Residential Total Residential Total Residential 27,720,594 27,720,594 27,720,594 27,720,594 83.4 83.4 83.4 83.4 338,692,990 338,692,990 338,692,990 338,692,990 214,159,811 214,159,811 214,159,811 214,159,811 Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year 107,080 107,080 107,080 107,080 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 586,739 586,739 586,739 586,739 Total Total Total Total Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use CO2e CO2e CO2e CO2e KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year 664,643,166 664,643,166 664,643,166 664,643,166 lbs/Year lbs/Year lbs/Year lbs/Year 420,262,182 420,262,182 420,262,182 420,262,182 GWH/Year GWH/Year GWH/Year GWH/Year 665 665 665 665 MTons/year MTons/year MTons/year MTons/year 190,628 190,628 190,628 190,628 Tons/Year Tons/Year Tons/Year Tons/Year 210,131 210,131 210,131 210,131 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 1,151,403 1,151,403 1,151,403 1,151,403 Sources Sources Sources Sources Note: New structures would be constructed to meet newer California Building Code energy efficiency requirements California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors 0.631 lbs of CO2/kwh Southern California Edison* 0.0000067 lbs of CH4/kwh For California 0.00000378 lbs of N20/kwh For California US EUA http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ee-factors.html GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e CH4 N20 21 310 lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh 0.632 0.632 0.632 0.632 Conversion Factors Conversion Factors Conversion Factors Conversion Factors 0.0005 lbs in a ton 0.9071847 Metric Tons 0.000293 BTU (British Thermal Units) in a kwh 471,000,000 tons of CO2e in 1990 and Goal for 2020: Assumptions Assumptions Assumptions Assumptions 1 Commercial energy use based on Table C20 and C14 (where climate specific information was not available) US Energy Information Administration www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/ 1 Residential energy use based on US Energy Information Administration www.eia.doe.gov Table US1. Total Energy Consumption, Expenditures, and Intensities, 2005. Part 1: Housing Unit Characteristics and Energy Usage Indicators Released January 2009. Assumes residential units are for sale units and are 1,466 sqft. Based on average sqft for units in the western United States (US Census). Based on CARB emissions inventory of GHG emissions for the State of California in 1990 of 471 million short tons of CO2e (427 million metric tons of CO2e) of in state emissions adopted in December 2007. * As reported to California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Existing Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Existing Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Existing Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Existing Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft 2) Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft 2/Year) /Year) /Year) /Year) Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO 2e/Year e/Year e/Year e/Year Retail (Other Than Mall) 605,676 11.3 6,844,139 4,327,635 Office 6,805,412 16.8 114,330,922 72,292,871 Public Assembly 19.7 0 0 Mercantile 0 17.3 0 0 Total Commercial Total Commercial Total Commercial Total Commercial 7,411,088 7,411,088 7,411,088 7,411,088 65.1 65.1 65.1 65.1 121,175,060 121,175,060 121,175,060 121,175,060 76,620,505 76,620,505 76,620,505 76,620,505 Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year 38,310 38,310 38,310 38,310 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 209,919 209,919 209,919 209,919 Residential Residential Residential Residential Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft 2) Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft 2 2 2 2 /Year) /Year) /Year) /Year) Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO 2e/Year e/Year e/Year e/Year Residential 571,740 41.7 6,985,576 4,417,067 Total Residential Total Residential Total Residential Total Residential 571,740 571,740 571,740 571,740 83.4 83.4 83.4 83.4 6,985,576 6,985,576 6,985,576 6,985,576 4,417,067 4,417,067 4,417,067 4,417,067 Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year 2,209 2,209 2,209 2,209 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 12,102 12,102 12,102 12,102 Total Total Total Total Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use CO2e CO2e CO2e CO2e KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year 128,160,637 128,160,637 128,160,637 128,160,637 lbs/Year lbs/Year lbs/Year lbs/Year 81,037,573 81,037,573 81,037,573 81,037,573 GWH/Year GWH/Year GWH/Year GWH/Year 128 128 128 128 MTons/year MTons/year MTons/year MTons/year 36,758 36,758 36,758 36,758 Tons/Year Tons/Year Tons/Year Tons/Year 40,519 40,519 40,519 40,519 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 222,021 222,021 222,021 222,021 Sources Sources Sources Sources Note: New structures would be constructed to meet newer California Building Code energy efficiency requirements California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors 0.631 lbs of CO2/kwh Southern California Edison* 0.0000067 lbs of CH4/kwh For California 0.00000378 lbs of N20/kwh For California US EUA http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ee-factors.html GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e CH4 N20 21 310 lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh 0.632 0.632 0.632 0.632 Conversion Factors Conversion Factors Conversion Factors Conversion Factors 0.0005 lbs in a ton 0.9071847 Metric Tons 0.000293 BTU (British Thermal Units) in a kwh 471,000,000 tons of CO2e in 1990 and Goal for 2020: Assumptions Assumptions Assumptions Assumptions 1 Commercial energy use based on Table C20 and C14 (where climate specific information was not available) US Energy Information Administration www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/ 1 Residential energy use based on US Energy Information Administration www.eia.doe.gov Table US1. Total Energy Consumption, Expenditures, and Intensities, 2005. Part 1: Housing Unit Characteristics and Energy Usage Indicators Released January 2009. Assumes residential units are for sale units and are 1,466 sqft. Based on average sqft for units in the western United States (US Census). Based on CARB emissions inventory of GHG emissions for the State of California in 1990 of 471 million short tons of CO2e (427 million metric tons of CO2e) of in state emissions adopted in December 2007. * As reported to California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future No Project Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future No Project Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future No Project Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Energy Use - Future No Project Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Commercial - Climate Zone 4 (Coastal California) Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft 2) Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft Energy Consumption (kWh/ft 2/Year) /Year) /Year) /Year) Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO 2e/Year e/Year e/Year e/Year Retail (Other Than Mall) 2,264,400 11.3 25,587,720 16,179,435 Office 5,055,550 16.8 84,933,240 53,704,349 Public Assembly 19.7 0 0 Mercantile 0 17.3 0 0 Total Commercial Total Commercial Total Commercial Total Commercial 7,319,950 7,319,950 7,319,950 7,319,950 65.1 65.1 65.1 65.1 110,520,960 110,520,960 110,520,960 110,520,960 69,883,785 69,883,785 69,883,785 69,883,785 Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year 34,942 34,942 34,942 34,942 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 191,462 191,462 191,462 191,462 Residential Residential Residential Residential Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft Area (ft 2) Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft Energy Consumption (BTU/1000ft 2 2 2 2 /Year) /Year) /Year) /Year) Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption Energy Consumption KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO lbs of CO 2e/Year e/Year e/Year e/Year Residential 15,049,956 41.7 183,881,867 116,270,803 Total Residential Total Residential Total Residential Total Residential 15,049,956 15,049,956 15,049,956 15,049,956 83.4 83.4 83.4 83.4 183,881,867 183,881,867 183,881,867 183,881,867 116,270,803 116,270,803 116,270,803 116,270,803 Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year Tons/year 58,135 58,135 58,135 58,135 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 318,550 318,550 318,550 318,550 Total Total Total Total Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use Annual Electricity Use CO2e CO2e CO2e CO2e KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year KWH/Year 294,402,827 294,402,827 294,402,827 294,402,827 lbs/Year lbs/Year lbs/Year lbs/Year 186,154,588 186,154,588 186,154,588 186,154,588 GWH/Year GWH/Year GWH/Year GWH/Year 294 294 294 294 MTons/year MTons/year MTons/year MTons/year 84,438 84,438 84,438 84,438 Tons/Year Tons/Year Tons/Year Tons/Year 93,077 93,077 93,077 93,077 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day 510,013 510,013 510,013 510,013 Sources Sources Sources Sources Note: New structures would be constructed to meet newer California Building Code energy efficiency requirements California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors California Energy Emission Factors 0.631 lbs of CO2/kwh Southern California Edison* 0.0000067 lbs of CH4/kwh For California 0.00000378 lbs of N20/kwh For California US EUA http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ee-factors.html GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e GHG Potential - Coversion to CO2e CH4 N20 21 310 lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh lbs of CO2e/kwh 0.632 0.632 0.632 0.632 Conversion Factors Conversion Factors Conversion Factors Conversion Factors 0.0005 lbs in a ton 0.9071847 Metric Tons 0.000293 BTU (British Thermal Units) in a kwh 471,000,000 tons of CO2e in 1990 and Goal for 2020: Assumptions Assumptions Assumptions Assumptions 1 Commercial energy use based on Table C20 and C14 (where climate specific information was not available) US Energy Information Administration www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/ 1 Residential energy use based on US Energy Information Administration www.eia.doe.gov Table US1. Total Energy Consumption, Expenditures, and Intensities, 2005. Part 1: Housing Unit Characteristics and Energy Usage Indicators Released January 2009. Assumes residential units are for sale units and are 1,466 sqft. Based on average sqft for units in the western United States (US Census). Based on CARB emissions inventory of GHG emissions for the State of California in 1990 of 471 million short tons of CO2e (427 million metric tons of CO2e) of in state emissions adopted in December 2007. * As reported to California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) ---PAGE BREAK--- 2007 Annual Entity Emissions: Electric Power Generation/Electric Utility Sector Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Ave Legend Rosemead Ca 91770 Blue = required Website: www.sce.com Green = required Orange = optional Reporting Year: 2007 Direct Baseline Year: 2002 Indirect Baseline Year: 0 Reporting Scope: CA and US Reporting Boundaries: Equity Share Reporting Protocols: General Reporting Protocol Version 3.0 (April 2008) Power/Utility Reporting Protocol Version 1.0 (April 2005) Contact: Howard Gollay Title: Manager Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Industry Type: Entity NAICS Code: Facility NAICS Code: Entity Description: POWER/UTILITY ENTITY EMISSIONS Direct Emissions from Owned Facilities CO2e CO2 CH4 N2O HFCs* PFCs* SF6 Unit Mobile Combustion 51,326.00 51,326.00 0.00 0.00 n.a. n.a. n.a. metric tons Total Stationary Combustion 6,868,412.00 6,827,012.00 820.00 78.00 n.a. n.a. n.a. metric tons 6,868,412.00 6,827,012.00 820.00 78.00 n.a. n.a. n.a. metric tons from Natural Gas-Related Activities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 n.a. n.a. n.a. metric tons from Other On-Site Combustion 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 n.a. n.a. n.a. metric tons Process Emissions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 n.a. metric tons Fugitive Emissions 269,329.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.27 metric tons TOTAL DIRECT EMISSIONS 7,189,067 6,878,338.00 820.00 78.00 0.00 0.00 11.27 metric tons 100 0 7,189,067 6,878,338.00 820.00 78.00 0.00 0.00 11.27 metric tons 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Comments: Indirect Emissions from Owned Facilities CO2e CO2 CH4 N2O Unit Electricity Purchased and Consumed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Steam Purchased and Consumed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Heat Purchased and Consumed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Cooling Purchased and Consumed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Total Transmission and Distribution Losses 1,985,658.20 1,982,911.00 14.20 7.90 metric tons from Purchased Power 1,454,248.20 1,452,267.00 10.20 5.70 metric tons from Wheeled Power (excluding Direct Access) 222,461.70 222,147.00 1.70 0.90 metric tons from Direct Access 308,948.30 308,497.00 2.30 1.30 metric tons TOTAL INDIRECT EMISSIONS 1,985,658 1,982,911.00 14.20 7.90 metric tons Comments: De Minimis Emissions CO2e CO2 CH4 N2O HFCs* PFCs* SF6 Unit TOTAL DE MINIMIS EMISSIONS 60,105 0.00 259.61 8.26 31.51 0.00 0.00 metric tons Comments: Electric Power Producer 2211 Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Total Direct Emissions from Deliveries outside of CA * Throughout this report, please note that HFCs and PFCs are classes of greenhouse gases that include many compounds. These columns may reflect the total emissions of multiple HFC and PFC compounds, each with a unique Global Warming Potential (GWP). The values you see in these columns represent the total metric tons of multiple HFC or PFC compounds summed together, not the metric tons of the individuals gases. Notes: Emissions reported in this section are estimated; these estimates are reviewed by the verifier and found to be less than 5% of the total entity's emissions. These estimates are conservatively estimated per the GRP. For example, although some HFC leakage is assumed for the largest of SCE facilities, the General Office Complex, it in fact had no HFC leaks that required refills in 2007. Southern California Edison is one of the largest electric utilities in the U.S., and the largest subsidiary of Edison International. On an average day, SCE provides power for 13 million individuals, 430 communities and cities, 5,000 large businesses, and 280,000 small businesses. in Central and Southern California. Delivering that power across a 50,000 mile service area takes 16 utility interconnections, 4,900 transmission and distribution circuits, 365 transmission and distribution crews, the days and nights of 12,642 employees, and over a century of experience. from Electric Power Generation, Transmission & Distributio % of Net Generation Delivered to CA % of Net Generation Delivered Outside of CA Total Direct Emissions from Deliveries to CA ---PAGE BREAK--- GENERATION & PURCHASED POWER INFORMATION Amount Unit CO2 Unit Owned Generation Total (Net) MWh 6,827,012.00 metric tons Fossil Generation (Net) 11,339,359.00 MWh 6,827,012.00 metric tons Biogenic Generation (Net) 0.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Geothermal Generation (Net) 0.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Other Renewable Generation (Net) 360,138.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Zero Emission Generation (Net) 19,604,576.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Co-generation (Net) 0.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Purchased Generation Total (Net) MWh metric tons Purchased Fossil Generation (Net) 20,658,274.00 MWh 8,755,072.00 metric tons Purchased Biogenic Generation (Net) 1,241,931.00 MWh 22,534.00 metric tons Purchased Geothermal Generation (Net) 7,469,380.00 MWh - metric tons Purchased Other Renewable Generation (Net) 3,404,770.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Purchased Zero Emission Generation (Net) 1,078,118.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Purchased Co-generation (Net) 12,831,457.00 MWh 6,064,179.00 metric tons Purchased Wholesale Power (Net) 5,970,767.00 MWh 2,379,845.00 metric tons TOTAL FOSSIL GENERATION/PURCHASES MWh metric tons TOTAL FROM BIOGENIC SOURCES 1,241,931.00 MWh 22,534.00 metric tons TOTAL OTHER GENERATION/PURCHASES MWh 8,444,024.00 metric tons TOTAL FROM ALL GENERATION SOURCES MWh metric tons TOTAL FROM RETAIL SALES 0.00 MWh 0.00 metric tons Comments: OTHER BIOGENIC EMISSIONS CO2e CO2 CH4 N2O Unit Stationary Combustion 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Mobile Combustion 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Process Emissions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Fugitive Emissions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons TOTAL OTHER BIOGENIC EMISSIONS 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Comments: Yes EMISSIONS EFFICIENCY METRICS Ratio Electricity Deliveries: 630.89 lbs CO2/MWh delivered (includes CO 2 from owned and purchased generation) Net Generation: 480.80 Net Fossil Generation: 1,327.32 lbs CO2/MWh net owned fossil generation only Comments: Note: Efficiency metrics are calculated using CO 2 emissions from stationary combustion for purposes of electricity generation. CO 2 emissions from biogenic sources are not included in the Electricity Deliveries metric; however MWh from biogenic and all other generation sources are included. Geothermal generation CO2 emissions and MWh are included in Net Generation metric but not Net Fossil Generation metric. Combustion sources related to any non-electricity generating natural gas operations are not included. Do you deliver power to an end-user/retail customer? (Enter yes or no) lbs CO2/MWh net owned generation (fossil, geothermal, hydroelectric, nuclear, solar, etc.) Note: CO 2 from biogenic sources (indicated in green ) are not included in entity's total CO 2 , nor used to calculate efficiency metrics. Biogenic Generation consists of biomass, landfill gas, waste-to-energy. Renewable Generation consists of small hydro, solar, wind. Zero Emission Generation consists of large hydro and nuclear. Co- generation consists of the electricity component only. CO 2 from Geothermal includes anthropogenic process emissions. Purchased Wholesale Power consists of Spot Market purchases. The goethermal CO2 emissions are estimated to be 508,217 metric tons. These emissions are excluded from the worksheet to be consistent with the PUP that states that only emissions from stationary sources should be included in the metric. Note: Other Biogenic Emissions sources include non-generation stationary combustion or mobile combustion (ethanol or biodiesel vehicles). ---PAGE BREAK--- OPTIONAL INFORMATION Optional Emissions CO2e CO2 CH4 N2O HFCs* PFCs* SF6 Unit TOTAL OPTIONAL EMISSIONS 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 metric tons Comments: metric tons CO2e metric tons CO2e metric tons CO2e metric tons CO2e MWh therms Information on Environmental Goals and Programs: Company Activities to Improve Energy Efficiency Comments: Purchases of GHG Emission Offsets: Information in this section is voluntarily provided by the participant for public information, but is not required and is not verified under the California Registry protocols. Sales of Tradable Renewable Certificates: Purchases of Tradable Renewable Certificates: Geographic Origin of Certificates: Purpose of Transaction: Information on GHG Risk and Liability: Company Activities Related to Renewable Energy Benefits of Actions: Description: Estimated Annual Energy Efficiency Savings: Reasons for Undertaking Energy Efficiency Programs: Other Emissions Efficiency Metric(s): Comments: Parties Notified of Transaction(s): Other Company Actions to Reduce GHG Emissions: Sales of GHG Emission Offsets: Type of Project(s): Terms of Purchase/Sale: Parties Notified of Transaction(s): Comments: Company Activities to Offset GHG Emissions ---PAGE BREAK--- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary Existing GHG Emissions Inventory Source CO 2e Emissions Tons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 Percent of Total Transportation Sector1 152,741 138,564 73% Electricity Sector Water Demand and Treatment3 863 783 0% Purchased Energy2 40,519 36,758 19% Total Energy Emissions 41,382 37,541 20% Recycling and Waste Sector4 4,264 3,868 2% Area Sources Sector5 12,160 11,032 6% Annual Average Construction6 0 0 0% Total all Sectors 210,547 191,005 100% Employees + Residents 15,407 15,407 Per-Capita 13.7 12.4 Adopted Business As Usual GHG Emissions Inventory Source CO 2e Emissions Tons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 Percent of Total Transportation Sector1 401,737 364,449 71% Electricity Sector Water Demand and Treatment3 2,637 2,392 0% Purchased Energy2 93,077 84,438 16% Total Energy Emissions 95,714 86,830 17% Recycling and Waste Sector4 12,111 10,987 2% Area Sources Sector5 35,804 32,481 6% Annual Average Construction6 22,342 20,268 4% Total all Sectors 567,708 515,016 100% Employees + Residents 30,039 30,039 Per-Capita 18.9 17.1 Amendment to the PTMLUP Business As Usual GHG Emissions Inventory Source CO 2e Emissions Tons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 Percent of Total Transportation Sector1 734,105 665,969 66% Electricity Sector Water Demand and Treatment3 5,786 5,249 1% Purchased Energy2 210,131 190,628 19% Total Energy Emissions 215,917 195,877 19% Recycling and Waste Sector4 30,248 27,441 3% Area Sources Sector5 77,088 69,933 7% Annual Average Construction6 53,346 48,394 5% Total all Sectors 1,110,703 1,007,613 100% Employees + Residents 64,864 64,864 Per-Capita 17.1 15.5 Net Increase in GHG Emissions from Existing Existing Amendment to MLUP Net Increase Source CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 Transportation Sector1 138,564 665,969 527,405 Electricity Sector Water Demand and Treatment3 783 5,249 4,466 Purchased Energy2 36,758 190,628 153,869 Total Energy Emissions 37,541 195,877 158,335 Recycling and Waste Sector4 3,868 27,441 23,572 Area Sources Sector5 11,032 69,933 58,901 Annual Average Construction6 0 48,394 48,394 Total all Sectors 191,005 1,007,613 816,608 ---PAGE BREAK--- Net Increase in GHG Emissions from Adopted Adopted Amendment to MLUP Net Increase Source CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 Transportation Sector1 364,449 665,969 301,519 Electricity Sector 0 0 Water Demand and Treatment3 2,392 5,249 2,857 Purchased Energy2 84,438 190,628 106,190 Total Energy Emissions 86,830 195,877 109,046 Recycling and Waste Sector4 10,987 27,441 16,454 Area Sources Sector5 32,481 69,933 37,452 Annual Average Construction6 20,268 48,394 28,126 Total all Sectors 515,016 1,007,613 492,597 Employees + Residents 30,039 64,864 Per-Capita 17.1 15.5 -1.6 Note CARB CO2e based on fuel consumption and not EMFAC 1 short ton (Ton) equals 0.9071847 GREENHOUSE GAS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Future No Project Future With Project Reductions CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 Reductions CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 2030 2030 Based on 2020 reductions 15% above 2005 Title 24- Area Sources1 3,217 8,835 15% above 2005 Title 24- Energy1 7,152 23,080 Renewable Energy Portfolio - Energy 16,230 35,185 Renewable Energy Portfolio - Water 502 1,102 Transportation - increase in Fuel Efficiency Year 155,984 285,035 Total Reductions from BAU - Year 2012 183,086 353,237 2 Based on an increase in renewable energy use from 12 percent to 33 percent by 2020. (CARB 2008a) 3 Based on an increase in 15 percent energy efficiency from the 2005 to 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, California Building 5. Service population includes people who live (residents) and work (employees) in the Platinum Triangle. The Adopted MLUP generates 15,399 residents and 14,640 employees for a service population of 30,039 people. The Amendment to the MLUP would generate 23,364 residents and 41,500 employees for a service population of 64,864 people. 6. URBEMIS2007, Version 9.2.4. Based on the default construction equipment mix and assumes CO2 represents 99.7 percent of total from diesel CO 2e while CH4, N2O, and fluorinated gases comprise the remaining percent (BAAQMD 2008). Does not include a reduction in GHG emissions from implementation of the low carbon fuel standard which would reduce the carbon content of fuel proposed by year 2020, thereby reducing GHG emissions from fuel from construction equipment by 10 percent. 1 URBEMIS2007, Version 9.2.4. Assumes CO2 represents 99.6 percent of total CO2e emissions from gasoline while CH4, N2O, and Fluorinated Gases comprise the remaining percent (BAAQMD 2008). 2. Includes energy required for water conveyance, treatment, distribution, and wastewater treatment. Water use estimated from SCAQMD Water and Electricity Usage in Southern California. CO 2e emissions calculated using energy usage factors and emission rates from the United States Department of Energy, Southern California Edison. Based on California Energy Commission. 2005, November. California's Water-Energy Relationship. CEC-700.2005-011-SF. 3. CO2e emissions calculated using energy usage factors and emission rates from the United States Department of Energy, EIA, and Southern California Edison. Based on the EIA 2003 Commercial Building Energy Consumption, December 2006, Table C14 and C20. Note: Does not take into account increase in appliance and building energy efficiency. 4. CO2e emissions from waste generation are based on the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) created by the USEPA and the waste stream jurisdictional profile for the City of Anaheim (CIWMB) 1 Based on a 42.8 percent increase in fuel efficiency in passenger vehicles from 2008 to 2020 in the CARB 2008 Technical Advisory. Pavley 2 would require an average fleet fuel economy of new cars of 42.5 mpg by 2020 compared to an existing average of 24.4 mpg (CARB 2008b). ---PAGE BREAK--- GHG Emissions Inventory with Scoping Plan Reductions Adpoted Amendment to MLUP CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 CO 2e Emissions MTons/Year 1 Source 2030 2030 Percent of Total Transportation Sector1 208,465 380,934 58% Electricity Sector Water Demand and Treatment3 1,890 4,147 1% Purchased Energy2 61,056 132,362 20% Total Energy Emissions 62,946 136,509 21% Recycling and Waste Sector4 10,987 27,441 4% Area Sources Sector5 29,264 61,098 9% Annual Average Construction6 20,268 48,394 7% Total all Sectors 331,930 654,375 100% Employees + Residents 30,039 64,864 Per-Capita 11.0 10.1 Percent Decrease from BAU 36% 35% Increase from Existing 463,371 PercentIncrease from Existing 243% Service Population Existing Adopted MLUP Residents 585 15399 23364 Employees 14,822 14640 41500 15407 30039 64864 ---PAGE BREAK--- GHG Emissions Analysis Summary Report Version 8 (5/06) GHG Emissions Waste Management Analysis for Prepared by: Project Period for this Analysis: 01/00/00 to 01/00/00 GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCO2E): 3,868 Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCO2E Glass - 663 - NA 25 Mixed Paper, Broad - 6,220 - NA 2,166 Mixed Metals - 1,184 - NA 45 Mixed Plastics - 1,867 - NA 71 Mixed Organics NA 5,864 - - 1,385 Mixed MSW NA 205 - NA 87 Concrete - 2,325 NA NA 88 ---PAGE BREAK--- GHG Emissions Analysis Summary Report Version 8 (5/06) GHG Emissions Waste Management Analysis for Prepared by: Project Period for this Analysis: 01/00/00 to 01/00/00 GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCO2E): 12,111 Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCO2E Glass - 2,094 - NA 80 Mixed Paper, Broad - 17,397 - NA 6,058 Mixed Metals - 3,170 - NA 120 Mixed Plastics - 5,345 - NA 203 Mixed Organics NA 20,682 - - 4,886 Mixed MSW NA 1,335 - NA 566 Concrete - 5,207 NA NA 198 ---PAGE BREAK--- GHG Emissions Analysis Summary Report Version 8 (5/06) GHG Emissions Waste Management Analysis for Prepared by: Project Period for this Analysis: 01/00/00 to 01/00/00 GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCO2E): 30,248 Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCO2E Glass - 5,216 - NA 198 Mixed Paper, Broad - 44,998 - NA 15,668 Mixed Metals - 8,317 - NA 316 Mixed Plastics - 13,723 - NA 522 Mixed Organics NA 49,928 - - 11,796 Mixed MSW NA 2,819 - NA 1,195 Concrete - 14,548 NA NA 553 ---PAGE BREAK--- Jurisdiction Profile for City of Anaheim Profiles Home Overview Profile New Jurisdiction Help General Information Jurisdiction: Anaheim County: Orange Size: 44.0 Sq./Miles Geographic Area: Southern California Rural/Urban: Urban (L)EA: CIWMB State Representatives 5 Senate District(s) More... Ashburn, Roy Senate District 18 Correa, Lou Senate District 34 Florez, Dean Senate District 16 Huff, Bob Senate District 29 Walters, Mimi Senate District 33 9 Assembly District(s) More... Conway, Connie Assembly District 34 Duvall, Michael D. Assembly District 72 Fuller, Jean Assembly District 32 Hagman, Curt Assembly District 60 Mendoza, Tony Assembly District 56 Miller, Jeff Assembly District 71 Silva, Jim Assembly District 67 Solorio, Jose Assembly District 69 Tran, Van Assembly District 68 US Senate Information US Representative Information County Information City Information Household Materials Generators (2004) Amount Rank (of 530) Population: 310,700 16 Population Density: 7,061 /sq mile Single Family Units: 49,188 24 Multi-Family Units: 46,077 13 Mobile Home Units: 4,086 35 Business Materials Generators Taxable Sales (2000): $4,263,199,000 Employment (2000): 146,426 Businesses (2000): 10,576 Household Materials Collection Data not available Business Materials Collection Commercial On-Site Recyclable Pickup: No Commercial On-Site Greenwaste Pickup: No Top 4 Specific Materials in Household Disposal (Based on 1999 Statewide Estimates) Top 4 Specific Materials in Business Disposal (Based on 1999 Statewide Estimates) Page 1 of 2 Jurisdiction Profile Overview - California Waste Stream Profiles 9/9/2009 http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Profiles/Juris/JurProfile1.asp?RG=C&JURID=15&JUR=Anaheim ---PAGE BREAK--- Specific Material Type % Tons Food 20.0% 24,314 Leaves and Grass 10.5% 12,742 Remainder/Composite Organic 9.5% 11,523 Remainder/Composite Paper 8.1% 9,797 More... Specific Material Type % Tons/Yr Food 16.0% 34,503 Remainder/Composite Paper 10.3% 22,248 Uncoated Corrugated Cardboard 6.7% 14,400 Lumber 6.3% 13,509 More... Household Disposal by Overall Materials (Based on 2000 Statewide Estimates) Material General Category % Tons Other Organic 45.0% 54,700 Paper 27.5% 33,369 Plastic 8.8% 10,754 Metal 4.6% 5,625 Construction and Demolition 4.5% 5,445 Glass 4.0% 4,906 Mixed Residue 4.0% 4,864 Household Hazardous Waste 0.3% 393 Special Waste 0.0% 29 Business Disposal By General Material Category (Based on 1999 Statewide Estimates) Material Category % Tons Paper 32.4% 69,983 Glass 3.4% 7,249 Metal 6.2% 13,457 Plastic 9.7% 20,861 Other Organic 29.6% 63,857 Construction and Demolition 12.4% 26,679 Household Hazardous Waste 0.2% 431 Special Waste 0.1% 168 Mixed Residue 0.6% 1,401 Household Disposal Rates (2008) 33% of overall disposal Total Household Waste Disposal (Tons/Yr.) 0 Top 4 Business Types with the Most Disposal (Based on 2000 Statewide Estimates) Sector % Tons/Yr Construction 12.9% 27,039 Retail Trade-Restaurants 12.7% 26,595 Services-Hotels / Lodging 8.3% 17,367 Services-Medical / Health 7.3% 15,252 More... Business Disposal Rates (2004) 67.0% of overall disposal Total Business Waste Disposal (Tons/Yr) Waste Stream Information Profiles http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Profiles/ CIWMB Webmaster: [EMAIL REDACTED] (916) 341-6141 Disclaimer Information Conditions of Use I Privacy Policy ©1995, 2009 California Integrated Waste Management Board. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2 Jurisdiction Profile Overview - California Waste Stream Profiles 9/9/2009 http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Profiles/Juris/JurProfile1.asp?RG=C&JURID=15&JUR=Anaheim ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy From Waste Disposal - Existing Jurisdiction Profile for the City of Anaheim Business Household Other Organic 29.6% 45.0% Paper 32.4% 27.5% Plastic 9.7% 8.8% Metal 6.2% 4.6% Construction and Demolition 12.4% 4.5% Glass 3.4% 4.0% Mixed Residue 0.6% 4.0% Household Hazardous Waste 0.2% 0.3% Special Waste 0.1% 0.0% Project-Generated Solid Waste lbs/day Commercial/Business 100,930 Total Business 100,930 Household 5,014 Total Household 5,014 Total 105,944 Project-Generated Solid Waste by Type lbs/day tons/year Other Organic 32,132 5,864 Paper 34,080 6,220 Plastic 10,231 1,867 Metal 6,488 1,184 Construction and Demolition 12,741 2,325 Glass 3,632 663 Mixed Residue 806 147 Household Hazardous Waste 217 40 Special Waste 101 18 100,429 18,328 Conversion 0.0005 tons/lbs WARM FIELDS Glass 663 Mixed Paper (general) 6,220 Mixed Metals 1,184 Mixed Plastics 1,867 Mixed Organics 5,864 Mixed MSW 205 Concrete1 2,325 FROM WARM 3,868 Metric Tons of CO2e 4,264 Short Tons of CO2e metric tons to short tons conversion 1.102311 tons/metric ton Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2009. Jurisdiction Profile for City of Anahiem. Based on 1999 (business) and 2000 (household) Statewide Estimates http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Profiles/Juris/JurProfile1.asp?RG=C&JURID=15&JUR=Anaheim ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy From Waste Disposal - Future No Project Jurisdiction Profile for the City of Anaheim Business Household Other Organic 29.6% 45.0% Paper 32.4% 27.5% Plastic 9.7% 8.8% Metal 6.2% 4.6% Construction and Demolition 12.4% 4.5% Glass 3.4% 4.0% Mixed Residue 0.6% 4.0% Household Hazardous Waste 0.2% 0.3% Special Waste 0.1% 0.0% Project-Generated Solid Waste lbs/day Commercial/Business 182,190 Total Business 182,190 Household 131,991 Total Household 131,991 Total 314,181 Project-Generated Solid Waste by Type lbs/day tons/year Other Organic 113,324 20,682 Paper 95,327 17,397 Plastic 29,288 5,345 Metal 17,367 3,170 Construction and Demolition 28,531 5,207 Glass 11,474 2,094 Mixed Residue 6,373 1,163 Household Hazardous Waste 760 139 Special Waste 182 33 302,627 55,229 Conversion 0.0005 tons/lbs WARM FIELDS Glass 2,094 Mixed Paper (general) 17,397 Mixed Metals 3,170 Mixed Plastics 5,345 Mixed Organics 20,682 Mixed MSW 1,335 Concrete1 5,207 FROM WARM 12,111 Metric Tons of CO2e 13,350 Short Tons of CO2e metric tons to short tons conversion 1.102311 tons/metric ton Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2009. Jurisdiction Profile for City of Anahiem. Based on 1999 (business) and 2000 (household) Statewide Estimates http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Profiles/Juris/JurProfile1.asp?RG=C&JURID=15&JUR=Anaheim ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy From Waste Disposal - Future PTMLUP Jurisdiction Profile for the City of Anaheim Business Household Other Organic 29.6% 45.0% Paper 32.4% 27.5% Plastic 9.7% 8.8% Metal 6.2% 4.6% Construction and Demolition 12.4% 4.5% Glass 3.4% 4.0% Mixed Residue 0.6% 4.0% Household Hazardous Waste 0.2% 0.3% Special Waste 0.1% 0.0% Project-Generated Solid Waste lbs/day Commercial/Business 554,647 Total Business 554,647 Household 243,116 Total Household 243,116 Total 797,763 Project-Generated Solid Waste by Type lbs/day tons/year Other Organic 273,578 49,928 Paper 246,563 44,998 Plastic 75,195 13,723 Metal 45,571 8,317 Construction and Demolition 79,716 14,548 Glass 28,583 5,216 Mixed Residue 13,053 2,382 Household Hazardous Waste 1,839 336 Special Waste 555 101 764,652 139,549 Conversion 0.0005 tons/lbs WARM FIELDS Glass 5,216 Mixed Paper (general) 44,998 Mixed Metals 8,317 Mixed Plastics 13,723 Mixed Organics 49,928 Mixed MSW 2,819 Concrete1 14,548 FROM WARM 30,248 Metric Tons of CO2e 33,343 Short Tons of CO2e metric tons to short tons conversion 1.102311 tons/metric ton Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2009. Jurisdiction Profile for City of Anahiem. Based on 1999 (business) and 2000 (household) Statewide Estimates http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Profiles/Juris/JurProfile1.asp?RG=C&JURID=15&JUR=Anaheim ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy Use from Project-Related Water Demand - Existing Total project-related water demand 588,942 gallons per day 214,963,830 gallons per year 215.0 million gallons per day Energy-intensity 2,730,041 Kwh/MG CO2 Emissions from Water Demand 1,726,239 lbs of CO2e/year 4,729 lbs of CO2e/day Project-related water-energy 863 tons of CO2e/year 783 metrics tons of CO2e/year Table 1-3: Electricity Use in Typical Urban Water Systems Kwh/MG Northern California Southern California Water Supply and Conveyance 150 8,900 Water Treatement 100 100 Water Distribution 1,200 1,200 Wastewater Treatment 2,500 2,500 Total 3,950 12,700 California Energy Emission Factors 0.631 lbs of CO2/kwh Southern California Edison* 0.0000067 lbs of CH4/kwh For California 0.00000378 lbs of N20/kwh For California Coversion to CO2e CH4 N20 21 310 lbs of CO2e/kwh 0.632 Sources Conversion: 0.0005 lbs in a ton 0.9071847 tons in a Metric Ton Assumptions for water demand: Based on the Initial Study, USS section. 1 LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, Exhibit M.2-12, p. M.2-25. http://www.ci.la.ca.us/ead/EADWeb-AQD/thresholdsguide.htm. 2 3 Not including commercial structures. 4 230 gpd is the wastewater generation factor for a three-bedroom single-family residence (LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, 2006). 5 160 gpd is the wastewater generation factor for a two-bedroom multifamily residential unit (LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, 2006). Water consumption is estimated to be approximately 125 percent of the estimated wastewater generated (per Program EIR p. 3.15-18). * As reported to California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) and for SCE California Energy Commission. 2005, November. California's Water-Energy Relationship. CEC-700.2005-011- SF. Energy Intensity: Amount of energy consumed per unit of water to perform water management-related actions desalting, pumping, presurizing, groundwater extraction, conveyance, and treatment) Kwh/MG: kilowatt hours per million gallon of water US Energy Information Administration (US EIA). 2002, April. Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program, Average Electricty Factors by State and Region. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ee-factors.html ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy Use from Project-Related Water Demand - Future No Project Total project-related water demand 1,799,215 gallons per day 656,713,475 gallons per year 656.7 million gallons per day Energy-intensity 8,340,261 Kwh/MG CO2 Emissions from Water Demand 5,273,651 lbs of CO2e/year 14,448 lbs of CO2e/day Project-related water-energy 2,637 tons of CO2e/year 2,392 metrics tons of CO2e/year Table 1-3: Electricity Use in Typical Urban Water Systems Kwh/MG Northern California Southern California Water Supply and Conveyance 150 8,900 Water Treatement 100 100 Water Distribution 1,200 1,200 Wastewater Treatment 2,500 2,500 Total 3,950 12,700 California Energy Emission Factors 0.631 lbs of CO2/kwh Southern California Edison* 0.0000067 lbs of CH4/kwh For California 0.00000378 lbs of N20/kwh For California Coversion to CO2e CH4 N20 21 310 lbs of CO2e/kwh 0.632 Sources Conversion: 0.0005 lbs in a ton 0.9071847 tons in a Metric Ton Assumptions for water demand: Based on the Initial Study, USS section. 1 LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, Exhibit M.2-12, p. M.2-25. http://www.ci.la.ca.us/ead/EADWeb-AQD/thresholdsguide.htm. 2 3 Not including commercial structures. 4 230 gpd is the wastewater generation factor for a three-bedroom single-family residence (LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, 2006). 5 160 gpd is the wastewater generation factor for a two-bedroom multifamily residential unit (LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, 2006). Water consumption is estimated to be approximately 125 percent of the estimated wastewater generated (per Program EIR p. 3.15-18). * As reported to California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) and for SCE California Energy Commission. 2005, November. California's Water-Energy Relationship. CEC-700.2005-011- SF. Energy Intensity: Amount of energy consumed per unit of water to perform water management-related actions desalting, pumping, presurizing, groundwater extraction, conveyance, and treatment) Kwh/MG: kilowatt hours per million gallon of water US Energy Information Administration (US EIA). 2002, April. Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program, Average Electricty Factors by State and Region. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ee-factors.html ---PAGE BREAK--- Energy Use from Project-Related Water Demand - Future With Project Total project-related water demand 3,948,335 gallons per day 1,441,142,275 gallons per year 1441.1 million gallons per day Energy-intensity 18,302,507 Kwh/MG CO2 Emissions from Water Demand 11,572,904 lbs of CO2e/year 31,707 lbs of CO2e/day Project-related water-energy 5,786 tons of CO2e/year 5,249 metrics tons of CO2e/year Table 1-3: Electricity Use in Typical Urban Water Systems Kwh/MG Northern California Southern California Water Supply and Conveyance 150 8,900 Water Treatement 100 100 Water Distribution 1,200 1,200 Wastewater Treatment 2,500 2,500 Total 3,950 12,700 California Energy Emission Factors 0.631 lbs of CO2/kwh Southern California Edison* 0.0000067 lbs of CH4/kwh For California 0.00000378 lbs of N20/kwh For California Coversion to CO2e CH4 N20 21 310 lbs of CO2e/kwh 0.632 Sources Conversion: 0.0005 lbs in a ton 0.9071847 tons in a Metric Ton Assumptions for water demand: Based on the Initial Study, USS section. 1 LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, Exhibit M.2-12, p. M.2-25. http://www.ci.la.ca.us/ead/EADWeb-AQD/thresholdsguide.htm. 2 3 Not including commercial structures. 4 230 gpd is the wastewater generation factor for a three-bedroom single-family residence (LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, 2006). 5 160 gpd is the wastewater generation factor for a two-bedroom multifamily residential unit (LA CEQA Thresholds Guide, 2006). Water consumption is estimated to be approximately 125 percent of the estimated wastewater generated (per Program EIR p. 3.15-18). * As reported to California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) and for SCE California Energy Commission. 2005, November. California's Water-Energy Relationship. CEC-700.2005-011- SF. Energy Intensity: Amount of energy consumed per unit of water to perform water management-related actions desalting, pumping, presurizing, groundwater extraction, conveyance, and treatment) Kwh/MG: kilowatt hours per million gallon of water US Energy Information Administration (US EIA). 2002, April. Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program, Average Electricty Factors by State and Region. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ee-factors.html ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:49:47 PM ROG 2.16 0.08 0.07 96.11 11.02 109.44 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Annual Emissions Reports (Tons/Year) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\FutureNP.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-FutureNoProject Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 109.44 28.55 17.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 35,661.67 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 109.44 28.55 17.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 35,661.67 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Annual Tons Per Year, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 28.51 16.34 0.00 0.05 0.05 35,623.90 Hearth 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.23 Landscape 0.01 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.00 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 0.05 0.05 35,661.67 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 28.55 17.20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:50:06 PM ROG 11.81 0.37 526.65 60.36 599.19 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\FutureNP.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-FutureNoProject Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 599.19 156.30 94.17 0.00 0.31 0.31 195,207.89 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 599.19 156.30 94.17 0.00 0.31 0.31 195,207.89 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 156.24 89.53 0.00 0.29 0.29 195,199.46 Hearth - No Summer Emissions Landscape 0.06 4.64 0.00 0.02 0.02 8.43 Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.00 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 0.31 0.31 195,207.89 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 156.30 94.17 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:49:56 PM ROG 11.81 3.32 526.65 60.36 602.14 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Winter Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\FutureNP.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-FutureNoProject Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 602.14 213.00 113.69 0.36 4.88 4.83 267,665.34 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 602.14 213.00 113.69 0.36 4.88 4.83 267,665.34 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Winter Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 156.24 89.53 0.00 0.29 0.29 195,199.46 Hearth 56.76 24.16 0.36 4.59 4.54 72,465.88 Landscaping - No Winter Emissions Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.36 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 4.88 4.83 267,665.34 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 213.00 113.69 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:51:56 PM ROG 4.64 0.26 0.09 177.03 28.05 210.07 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Annual Emissions Reports (Tons/Year) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\FutureWP.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-FutureWithProject Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 210.07 61.84 39.01 0.00 0.12 0.11 76,780.70 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 210.07 61.84 39.01 0.00 0.12 0.11 76,780.70 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Annual Tons Per Year, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 61.77 37.86 0.00 0.12 0.11 76,711.91 Hearth 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.74 Landscape 0.02 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.05 Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.00 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 0.12 0.11 76,780.70 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 61.84 39.01 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:51:38 PM ROG 25.43 0.49 970.03 153.71 1,149.66 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\FutureWP.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-FutureWithProject Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 1,149.66 338.53 213.64 0.00 0.65 0.64 420,350.45 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 1,149.66 338.53 213.64 0.00 0.65 0.64 420,350.45 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 338.45 207.46 0.00 0.63 0.62 420,339.21 Hearth - No Summer Emissions Landscape 0.08 6.18 0.00 0.02 0.02 11.24 Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.00 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 0.65 0.64 420,350.45 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 338.53 213.64 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:51:47 PM ROG 25.43 6.12 970.03 153.71 1,155.29 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Winter Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\FutureWP.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-FutureWithProject Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 1,155.29 443.01 251.95 0.67 9.08 8.98 553,814.50 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 1,155.29 443.01 251.95 0.67 9.08 8.98 553,814.50 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Winter Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 338.45 207.46 0.00 0.63 0.62 420,339.21 Hearth 104.56 44.49 0.67 8.45 8.36 133,475.29 Landscaping - No Winter Emissions Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.67 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 9.08 8.98 553,814.50 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 443.01 251.95 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/4/2009 03:54:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Dust PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Exhaust CO2 17.95 82.44 214.38 0.31 350.90 3.69 354.59 3.35 32,436.33 17.95 82.44 214.38 0.31 58.43 3.69 62.12 3.35 32,436.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.48 0.00 0.00 28.77 127.00 337.67 0.52 592.43 5.77 598.20 5.22 54,753.79 28.77 127.00 337.67 0.52 98.65 5.77 104.42 5.22 54,753.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.54 0.00 0.00 27.40 115.60 315.61 0.52 594.71 5.30 600.01 4.79 54,958.62 27.40 115.60 315.61 0.52 99.03 5.30 104.33 4.79 54,958.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.61 0.00 0.00 26.01 104.30 293.34 0.52 594.71 4.85 599.56 4.37 54,955.64 26.01 104.30 293.34 0.52 99.03 4.85 103.88 4.37 54,955.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.67 0.00 0.00 24.75 93.55 273.40 0.52 594.71 4.42 599.13 3.97 54,952.81 24.75 93.55 273.40 0.52 99.03 4.42 103.45 3.97 54,952.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.73 0.00 0.00 2014 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 24.98 Percent Reduction 83.13 80.56 2014 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 128.49 2013 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 25.38 Percent Reduction 83.13 80.31 2013 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 128.90 2012 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 25.79 Percent Reduction 83.13 80.05 2012 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 129.31 2011 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 20.93 26.15 Percent Reduction 83.13 79.77 2011 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.05 129.27 2010 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 12.39 15.74 Percent Reduction 83.13 79.51 PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 2010 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 73.47 76.82 Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Summary Report for Annual Emissions (Tons/Year) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\sampleconstruction.urb924 Project Name: Construction Sample ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/4/2009 03:54:27 PM 23.53 83.48 254.55 0.52 594.71 4.05 598.76 3.63 54,950.73 23.53 83.48 254.55 0.52 99.03 4.05 103.08 3.63 54,950.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.78 0.00 0.00 22.49 75.14 238.10 0.52 594.71 3.73 598.44 3.34 54,946.79 22.49 75.14 238.10 0.52 99.03 3.73 102.76 3.34 54,946.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.83 0.00 0.00 21.49 67.67 221.71 0.52 592.43 3.45 595.88 3.08 54,733.77 21.49 67.67 221.71 0.52 98.65 3.45 102.10 3.08 54,733.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.87 0.00 0.00 20.72 61.66 208.14 0.52 594.71 3.21 597.93 2.86 54,942.57 20.72 61.66 208.14 0.52 99.03 3.21 102.25 2.86 54,942.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.90 0.00 0.00 19.96 56.11 194.79 0.52 594.71 2.99 597.70 2.66 54,941.55 19.96 56.11 194.79 0.52 99.03 2.99 102.02 2.66 54,941.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.93 0.00 0.00 19.30 51.47 183.07 0.53 596.99 2.87 599.86 2.54 55,151.14 19.30 51.47 183.07 0.53 99.41 2.87 102.28 2.54 55,151.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.95 0.00 0.00 17.29 40.83 138.27 0.52 594.71 2.61 597.32 2.30 54,934.43 17.29 40.83 138.27 0.52 99.03 2.61 101.64 2.30 54,934.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.98 0.00 0.00 17.23 40.68 137.74 0.52 592.43 2.60 595.03 2.29 54,723.95 17.23 40.68 137.74 0.52 98.65 2.60 101.25 2.29 54,723.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.98 0.00 0.00 17.23 40.68 137.74 0.52 592.43 2.60 595.03 2.29 54,723.95 17.23 40.68 137.74 0.52 98.65 2.60 101.25 2.29 54,723.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.98 0.00 0.00 17.36 40.99 138.80 0.53 596.99 2.62 599.61 2.31 55,144.90 17.36 40.99 138.80 0.53 99.41 2.62 102.03 2.31 55,144.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.98 0.00 0.00 2024 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.09 23.40 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.62 2024 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 125.00 127.31 2023 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 20.93 23.22 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.62 2023 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.05 126.34 2022 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 20.93 23.22 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.62 2022 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.05 126.34 2021 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 23.31 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.62 2021 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 126.82 2020 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.09 23.63 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.47 2020 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 125.00 127.54 2019 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 23.66 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.39 2019 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 127.18 2018 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 23.87 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.26 2018 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 127.39 2017 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 20.93 24.00 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.12 2017 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.05 127.12 2016 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 24.34 Percent Reduction 83.13 80.96 2016 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 127.86 2015 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 24.64 Percent Reduction 83.13 80.77 2015 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 128.16 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/4/2009 03:54:27 PM 17.29 40.83 138.27 0.52 594.71 2.61 597.32 2.30 54,934.43 17.29 40.83 138.27 0.52 99.03 2.61 101.64 2.30 54,934.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 82.98 0.00 0.00 16.33 36.90 115.11 0.52 594.71 2.51 597.22 2.21 54,931.79 16.33 36.90 115.11 0.52 99.03 2.51 101.54 2.21 54,931.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 83.00 0.00 0.00 16.33 36.90 115.11 0.52 594.71 2.51 597.22 2.21 54,931.79 16.33 36.90 115.11 0.52 99.03 2.51 101.54 2.21 54,931.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 83.00 0.00 0.00 16.27 36.76 114.67 0.52 592.43 2.50 594.93 2.20 54,721.32 16.27 36.76 114.67 0.52 98.65 2.50 101.15 2.20 54,721.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 83.00 0.00 0.00 16.33 36.90 115.11 0.52 594.71 2.51 597.22 2.21 54,931.79 16.33 36.90 115.11 0.52 99.03 2.51 101.54 2.21 54,931.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 83.00 0.00 0.00 6.82 15.41 48.07 0.22 248.37 1.05 249.41 0.92 22,940.86 6.82 15.41 48.07 0.22 41.36 1.05 42.41 0.92 22,940.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.35 0.00 83.00 0.00 0.00 2030 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 8.77 9.70 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.68 2030 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 52.00 52.93 2029 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 23.22 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.68 2029 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 126.74 2028 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 20.93 23.13 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.68 2028 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.05 126.25 2027 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 23.22 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.68 2027 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 126.74 2026 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 23.22 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.68 2026 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 126.74 2025 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.01 23.31 Percent Reduction 83.13 81.62 2025 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 124.52 126.82 ---PAGE BREAK--- SO2 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:30:28 PM Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Annual Emissions Reports (Tons/Year) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\sampleconstruction_adopted.urb924 Project Name: Construction Sample - Adopted MLUP Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO PM10 Dust PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CO2 2010 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 7.05 39.51 85.84 63.65 1.88 65.53 13.37 1.71 15.08 13,152.25 2010 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 7.05 39.51 85.84 10.46 1.88 12.34 2.26 1.71 3.97 13,152.25 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 81.16 83.10 0.00 73.66 0.00 2011 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 11.21 61.14 135.45 107.46 2.95 110.41 22.57 2.68 25.25 22,201.76 2011 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 11.21 61.14 135.45 17.66 2.95 20.61 3.81 2.68 6.50 22,201.76 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 81.33 83.10 0.00 74.27 0.00 2012 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 10.58 55.95 126.87 107.87 2.71 110.58 22.65 2.46 25.11 22,285.00 2012 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 10.58 55.95 126.87 17.73 2.71 20.43 3.83 2.46 6.28 22,285.00 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 81.52 83.10 0.00 74.97 0.00 2013 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 9.96 50.80 118.20 107.87 2.48 110.35 22.65 2.24 24.90 22,283.91 2013 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 9.96 50.80 118.20 17.73 2.48 20.21 3.83 2.24 6.07 22,283.91 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 81.69 83.10 0.00 75.61 0.00 2014 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 9.38 45.86 110.43 107.87 2.25 110.12 22.65 2.03 24.68 22,282.87 2014 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 9.38 45.86 110.43 17.73 2.25 19.97 3.83 2.03 5.86 22,282.87 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 81.86 83.10 0.00 76.27 0.00 2015 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 8.82 41.12 103.08 107.87 2.06 109.93 22.65 1.86 24.51 22,282.12 2015 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 8.82 41.12 103.08 17.73 2.06 19.79 3.83 1.86 5.69 22,282.12 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.00 83.10 0.00 76.80 0.00 2016 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 8.34 37.13 96.69 107.87 1.88 109.75 22.65 1.69 24.35 22,280.66 2016 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 8.34 37.13 96.69 17.73 1.88 19.61 3.83 1.69 5.52 22,280.66 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.13 83.10 0.00 77.32 0.00 2017 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 7.88 33.51 90.30 107.46 1.72 109.18 22.57 1.55 24.12 22,194.38 2017 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 7.88 33.51 90.30 17.66 1.72 19.38 3.81 1.55 5.36 22,194.38 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.25 83.10 0.00 77.76 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:30:28 PM 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 2018 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 7.50 30.56 85.06 107.87 1.59 109.46 22.65 1.43 24.08 22,279.14 2018 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 7.50 30.56 85.06 17.73 1.59 19.32 3.83 1.43 5.26 22,279.14 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.35 83.10 0.00 78.18 0.00 2019 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 7.15 27.83 79.88 107.87 1.46 109.33 22.65 1.31 23.96 22,278.78 2019 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 7.15 27.83 79.88 17.73 1.46 19.19 3.83 1.31 5.14 22,278.78 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.45 83.10 0.00 78.56 0.00 2020 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 6.83 25.53 75.37 108.29 1.39 109.67 22.74 1.24 23.98 22,363.83 2020 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 6.83 25.53 75.37 17.80 1.39 19.18 3.84 1.24 5.08 22,363.83 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.51 83.10 0.00 78.81 0.00 2021 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 6.05 21.24 58.25 107.87 1.28 109.15 22.65 1.14 23.79 22,276.24 2021 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 6.05 21.24 58.25 17.73 1.28 19.01 3.83 1.14 4.97 22,276.24 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.59 83.10 0.00 79.12 0.00 2022 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 6.03 21.16 58.02 107.46 1.27 108.73 22.57 1.13 23.70 22,190.89 2022 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 6.03 21.16 58.02 17.66 1.27 18.93 3.81 1.13 4.95 22,190.89 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.59 83.10 0.00 79.12 0.00 2023 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 6.03 21.16 58.02 107.46 1.27 108.73 22.57 1.13 23.70 22,190.89 2023 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 6.03 21.16 58.02 17.66 1.27 18.93 3.81 1.13 4.95 22,190.89 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.59 83.10 0.00 79.12 0.00 2024 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 6.07 21.32 58.47 108.29 1.28 109.57 22.74 1.14 23.88 22,361.59 2024 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 6.07 21.32 58.47 17.80 1.28 19.08 3.84 1.14 4.99 22,361.59 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.59 83.10 0.00 79.12 0.00 2025 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 6.05 21.24 58.25 107.87 1.28 109.15 22.65 1.14 23.79 22,276.24 2025 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 6.05 21.24 58.25 17.73 1.28 19.01 3.83 1.14 4.97 22,276.24 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.59 83.10 0.00 79.12 0.00 2026 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 5.68 19.67 49.41 107.87 1.24 109.11 22.65 1.10 23.76 22,275.31 2026 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 5.68 19.67 49.41 17.73 1.24 18.97 3.83 1.10 4.93 22,275.31 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.62 83.10 0.00 79.25 0.00 2027 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 5.68 19.67 49.41 107.87 1.24 109.11 22.65 1.10 23.76 22,275.31 2027 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 5.68 19.67 49.41 17.73 1.24 18.97 3.83 1.10 4.93 22,275.31 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.62 83.10 0.00 79.25 0.00 2028 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 5.65 19.59 49.22 107.46 1.23 108.69 22.57 1.10 23.66 22,189.96 2028 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 5.65 19.59 49.22 17.66 1.23 18.89 3.81 1.10 4.91 22,189.96 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.62 83.10 0.00 79.25 0.00 2029 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 5.68 19.67 49.41 107.87 1.24 109.11 22.65 1.10 23.76 22,275.31 2029 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 5.68 19.67 49.41 17.73 1.24 18.97 3.83 1.10 4.93 22,275.31 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.62 83.10 0.00 79.25 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:30:28 PM 0.08 0.08 0.00 2030 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 2.37 8.21 20.64 45.05 0.52 45.57 9.46 2030 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 2.37 8.21 20.64 2.06 9,302.72 0.46 9.92 9,302.72 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.46 7.40 0.52 7.92 0.00 79.25 0.00 83.57 0.00 82.62 83.10 Percent Reduction 0.00 Phase Assumptions Phase: Demolition 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Demolition Description Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 2613813 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 37.57 On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 0.75 Off-Road Equipment: 3 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description Total Acres Disturbed: 820 Maximum Daily Acreage Disturbed: 41 Fugitive Dust Level of Detail: Default 20 lbs per acre-day On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 13.69 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Graders (174 hp) operating at a 0.61 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Scrapers (313 hp) operating at a 0.72 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Water Trucks (189 hp) operating at a 0.5 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Trenching 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Trenching Description Off-Road Equipment: 2 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Other General Industrial Equipment (238 hp) operating at a 0.51 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 0 hours per day Phase: Paving 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Paving Description Acres to be Paved: 57.62 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Pavers (100 hp) operating at a 0.62 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Paving Equipment (104 hp) operating at a 0.53 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rollers (95 hp) operating at a 0.56 load factor for 6 hours per day Phase: Building Construction 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Building Construction Description Off-Road Equipment: 1 Cranes (399 hp) operating at a 0.43 load factor for 7 hours per day 3 Forklifts (145 hp) operating at a 0.3 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Generator Sets (49 hp) operating at a 0.74 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 7 hours per day 1 Welders (45 hp) operating at a 0.45 load factor for 8 hours per day ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:30:28 PM Phase: Architectural Coating 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Architectural Coating Description Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 50 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Nonresidential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Nonresidential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Construction Related Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures apply to Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 5% PM25: 5% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Water exposed surfaces 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 44% PM25: 44% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Manage haul road dust 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 55% PM25: 55% PM10: 55% PM25: 55% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Equipment loading/unloading mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 69% PM25: 69% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph mitigation reduces emissions by: ---PAGE BREAK--- SO2 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:31:50 PM Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Annual Emissions Reports (Tons/Year) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\sampleconstruction.urb924 Project Name: Construction Sample - Amendment to MLUP Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO PM10 Dust PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CO2 2010 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 17.07 72.97 210.38 64.44 3.35 67.79 13.65 3.03 16.68 31,405.90 2010 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 17.07 72.97 210.38 11.26 3.35 14.60 2.54 3.03 5.57 31,405.90 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 78.46 81.38 0.00 66.59 0.00 2011 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 27.39 112.18 331.50 108.80 5.25 114.05 23.04 4.75 27.79 53,014.11 2011 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 27.39 112.18 331.50 19.00 5.25 24.25 4.29 4.75 9.04 53,014.11 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 78.74 81.38 0.00 67.48 0.00 2012 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 26.08 101.87 309.96 109.22 4.82 114.04 23.13 4.34 27.48 53,212.25 2012 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 26.08 101.87 309.96 19.08 4.82 23.89 4.31 4.34 8.65 53,212.25 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 79.05 81.38 0.00 68.51 0.00 2013 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 24.74 91.66 288.20 109.22 4.41 113.63 23.13 3.97 27.10 53,209.27 2013 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 24.74 91.66 288.20 19.08 4.41 23.49 4.31 3.97 8.28 53,209.27 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 79.33 81.38 0.00 69.46 0.00 2014 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 23.55 82.05 268.70 109.22 4.01 113.23 23.13 3.60 26.73 53,206.44 2014 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 23.55 82.05 268.70 19.08 4.01 23.09 4.31 3.60 7.91 53,206.44 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 79.61 81.38 0.00 70.42 0.00 2015 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 22.40 73.03 250.25 109.22 3.69 112.91 23.13 3.30 26.43 53,204.37 2015 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 22.40 73.03 250.25 19.08 3.69 22.76 4.31 3.30 7.61 53,204.37 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 79.84 81.38 0.00 71.22 0.00 2016 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 21.43 65.59 234.15 109.22 3.39 112.60 23.13 3.02 26.15 53,200.43 2016 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 21.43 65.59 234.15 19.08 3.39 22.46 4.31 3.02 7.33 53,200.43 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.05 81.38 0.00 71.98 0.00 2017 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 20.48 58.97 218.08 108.80 3.13 111.93 23.04 2.79 25.83 52,994.10 2017 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 20.48 58.97 218.08 19.00 3.13 22.14 4.29 2.79 7.08 52,994.10 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.22 81.38 0.00 72.59 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:31:50 PM 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 2018 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 19.76 53.66 204.74 109.22 2.93 112.15 23.13 2.60 25.73 53,196.21 2018 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 19.76 53.66 204.74 19.08 2.93 22.01 4.31 2.60 6.91 53,196.21 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.38 81.38 0.00 73.16 0.00 2019 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 19.04 48.78 191.61 109.22 2.73 111.95 23.13 2.42 25.55 53,195.19 2019 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 19.04 48.78 191.61 19.08 2.73 21.81 4.31 2.42 6.73 53,195.19 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.52 81.38 0.00 73.67 0.00 2020 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 18.43 44.73 180.07 109.64 2.63 112.27 23.22 2.33 25.55 53,398.09 2020 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 18.43 44.73 180.07 19.15 2.63 21.78 4.32 2.33 6.65 53,398.09 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.60 81.38 0.00 73.97 0.00 2021 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 16.47 34.68 135.49 109.22 2.39 111.61 23.13 2.10 25.24 53,188.07 2021 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 16.47 34.68 135.49 19.08 2.39 21.47 4.31 2.10 6.41 53,188.07 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.77 81.38 0.00 74.59 0.00 2022 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 16.41 34.55 134.97 108.80 2.38 111.18 23.04 2.10 25.14 52,984.29 2022 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 16.41 34.55 134.97 19.00 2.38 21.39 4.29 2.10 6.39 52,984.29 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.77 81.38 0.00 74.59 0.00 2023 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 16.41 34.55 134.97 108.80 2.38 111.18 23.04 2.10 25.14 52,984.29 2023 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 16.41 34.55 134.97 19.00 2.38 21.39 4.29 2.10 6.39 52,984.29 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.77 81.38 0.00 74.59 0.00 2024 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 16.53 34.81 136.01 109.64 2.40 112.04 23.22 2.11 25.33 53,391.86 2024 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 16.53 34.81 136.01 19.15 2.40 21.55 4.32 2.11 6.44 53,391.86 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.77 81.38 0.00 74.59 0.00 2025 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 16.47 34.68 135.49 109.22 2.39 111.61 23.13 2.10 25.24 53,188.07 2025 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 16.47 34.68 135.49 19.08 2.39 21.47 4.31 2.10 6.41 53,188.07 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.77 81.38 0.00 74.59 0.00 2026 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 15.52 30.93 112.42 109.22 2.30 111.52 23.13 2.02 25.15 53,185.44 2026 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 15.52 30.93 112.42 19.08 2.30 21.38 4.31 2.02 6.33 53,185.44 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.83 81.38 0.00 74.84 0.00 2027 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 15.52 30.93 112.42 109.22 2.30 111.52 23.13 2.02 25.15 53,185.44 2027 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 15.52 30.93 112.42 19.08 2.30 21.38 4.31 2.02 6.33 53,185.44 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.83 81.38 0.00 74.84 0.00 2028 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 15.46 30.82 111.99 108.80 2.29 111.09 23.04 2.01 25.06 52,981.66 2028 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 15.46 30.82 111.99 19.00 2.29 21.30 4.29 2.01 6.31 52,981.66 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.83 81.38 0.00 74.84 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:31:50 PM 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 2029 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 15.52 30.93 112.42 109.22 2.30 111.52 23.13 2.02 25.15 53,185.44 2029 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 15.52 30.93 112.42 19.08 2.30 21.38 4.31 2.02 6.33 53,185.44 Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.83 81.38 0.00 74.84 0.00 2030 TOTALS (tons/year unmitigated) 6.48 12.92 46.95 45.61 0.96 46.57 9.66 2030 TOTALS (tons/year mitigated) 6.48 12.92 46.95 2.64 22,211.54 0.84 10.51 22,211.54 0.00 0.00 1.80 0.84 7.97 0.96 8.93 0.00 74.84 0.00 82.53 0.00 80.83 81.38 Percent Reduction 0.00 Phase Assumptions Phase: Demolition 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Demolition Description Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 1477273 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 21.97 On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 0.44 Off-Road Equipment: 3 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description Total Acres Disturbed: 820 Maximum Daily Acreage Disturbed: 41 Fugitive Dust Level of Detail: Default 20 lbs per acre-day On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 13.69 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Graders (174 hp) operating at a 0.61 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Scrapers (313 hp) operating at a 0.72 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Water Trucks (189 hp) operating at a 0.5 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Trenching 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Trenching Description Off-Road Equipment: 4 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Other General Industrial Equipment (238 hp) operating at a 0.51 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 0 hours per day Phase: Paving 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Paving Description Acres to be Paved: 225.45 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Pavers (100 hp) operating at a 0.62 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Paving Equipment (104 hp) operating at a 0.53 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rollers (95 hp) operating at a 0.56 load factor for 6 hours per day ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:31:50 PM Phase: Building Construction 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Building Construction Description Off-Road Equipment: 1 Cranes (399 hp) operating at a 0.43 load factor for 7 hours per day 3 Forklifts (145 hp) operating at a 0.3 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Generator Sets (49 hp) operating at a 0.74 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 7 hours per day 1 Welders (45 hp) operating at a 0.45 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Architectural Coating 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Architectural Coating Description Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 50 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Nonresidential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Nonresidential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Construction Related Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures apply to Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 5% PM25: 5% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Water exposed surfaces 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 44% PM25: 44% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Manage haul road dust 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 55% PM25: 55% PM10: 55% PM25: 55% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Equipment loading/unloading mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 69% PM25: 69% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph mitigation reduces emissions by: ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:30:06 PM Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\sampleconstruction_adopted.urb924 Project Name: Construction Sample - Adopted MLUP Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Phase Assumptions Phase: Demolition 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Demolition Description Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 2613813 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 37.57 On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 0.75 Off-Road Equipment: 3 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description Total Acres Disturbed: 820 Maximum Daily Acreage Disturbed: 41 Fugitive Dust Level of Detail: Default 20 lbs per acre-day On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 13.69 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Graders (174 hp) operating at a 0.61 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Scrapers (313 hp) operating at a 0.72 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Water Trucks (189 hp) operating at a 0.5 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Trenching 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Trenching Description Off-Road Equipment: 2 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Other General Industrial Equipment (238 hp) operating at a 0.51 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 0 hours per day Phase: Paving 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Paving Description Acres to be Paved: 57.62 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Pavers (100 hp) operating at a 0.62 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Paving Equipment (104 hp) operating at a 0.53 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rollers (95 hp) operating at a 0.56 load factor for 6 hours per day ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:30:06 PM Phase: Building Construction 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Building Construction Description Off-Road Equipment: 1 Cranes (399 hp) operating at a 0.43 load factor for 7 hours per day 3 Forklifts (145 hp) operating at a 0.3 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Generator Sets (49 hp) operating at a 0.74 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 7 hours per day 1 Welders (45 hp) operating at a 0.45 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Architectural Coating 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Architectural Coating Description Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 50 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Nonresidential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Nonresidential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Construction Mitigated Detail Report: CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Dust PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CO2 Time Slice 6/1/2010-12/31/2010 Active 91.56 513.10 1,114.75 1.55 135.85 24.45 160.30 29.33 22.26 51.59 170,808.46 Asphalt 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 3.28 19.36 11.75 0.00 0.01 1.69 1.70 0.00 1.55 1.56 1,591.17 Paving Off-Gas 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving Off Road Diesel 3.20 19.17 10.47 0.00 0.00 1.68 1.68 0.00 1.55 1.55 1,418.81 Paving On Road Diesel 0.01 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 Paving Worker Trips 0.04 0.07 1.23 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 155.56 Building 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 50.67 333.33 1,016.49 1.54 6.55 14.96 21.51 2.32 13.53 15.86 153,797.61 Building Off Road Diesel 4.08 23.31 14.31 0.00 0.00 1.67 1.67 0.00 1.54 1.54 2,259.28 Building Vendor Trips 21.80 263.08 197.62 0.48 1.75 10.65 12.40 0.59 9.77 10.36 49,838.64 Building Worker Trips 24.79 46.94 804.56 1.06 4.80 2.64 7.44 1.73 2.23 3.96 101,699.69 Coating 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 18.64 0.04 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.44 Architectural Coating 18.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Worker Trips 0.02 0.04 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.44 Demolition 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 5.58 46.53 27.46 0.00 0.02 2.23 2.25 0.01 2.05 2.06 4,291.17 Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demo Off Road Diesel 5.54 46.44 26.23 0.00 0.00 2.22 2.22 0.00 2.05 2.05 4,132.45 Demo On Road Diesel 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.16 Demo Worker Trips 0.04 0.07 1.23 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 155.56 Mass Grading 06/01/2010- 11.30 96.09 49.23 0.00 129.26 4.69 133.95 27.00 4.31 31.31 9,211.98 Mass Grading Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129.24 0.00 129.24 26.99 0.00 26.99 0.00 Mass Grading Off Road Diesel 11.19 95.53 46.62 0.00 0.00 4.66 4.66 0.00 4.29 4.29 8,842.87 Mass Grading On Road Diesel 0.03 0.42 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 58.01 Mass Grading Worker Trips 0.08 0.14 2.46 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 311.11 Trenching 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 2.09 17.75 9.20 0.00 0.01 0.88 0.89 0.00 0.81 0.81 1,839.08 Trenching Off Road Diesel 2.06 17.69 8.22 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.81 0.81 1,714.64 Trenching Worker Trips 0.03 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 124.44 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:30:06 PM Construction Related Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures apply to Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 5% PM25: 5% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Water exposed surfaces 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 55% PM25: 55% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Equipment loading/unloading mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 69% PM25: 69% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 44% PM25: 44% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Manage haul road dust 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 55% PM25: 55% ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:31:24 PM Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\sampleconstruction.urb924 Project Name: Construction Sample - Amendment to MLUP Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Phase Assumptions Phase: Demolition 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Demolition Description Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 1477273 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 21.97 On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 0.44 Off-Road Equipment: 3 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description Total Acres Disturbed: 820 Maximum Daily Acreage Disturbed: 41 Fugitive Dust Level of Detail: Default 20 lbs per acre-day On Road Truck Travel (VMT): 13.69 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Graders (174 hp) operating at a 0.61 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Rubber Tired Dozers (357 hp) operating at a 0.59 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Scrapers (313 hp) operating at a 0.72 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Water Trucks (189 hp) operating at a 0.5 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Trenching 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Trenching Description Off-Road Equipment: 4 Excavators (168 hp) operating at a 0.57 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Other General Industrial Equipment (238 hp) operating at a 0.51 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 0 hours per day Phase: Paving 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Paving Description Acres to be Paved: 225.45 Off-Road Equipment: 1 Pavers (100 hp) operating at a 0.62 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Paving Equipment (104 hp) operating at a 0.53 load factor for 8 hours per day 2 Rollers (95 hp) operating at a 0.56 load factor for 6 hours per day ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:31:24 PM Phase: Building Construction 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Building Construction Description Off-Road Equipment: 1 Cranes (399 hp) operating at a 0.43 load factor for 7 hours per day 3 Forklifts (145 hp) operating at a 0.3 load factor for 8 hours per day 1 Generator Sets (49 hp) operating at a 0.74 load factor for 8 hours per day 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes (108 hp) operating at a 0.55 load factor for 7 hours per day 1 Welders (45 hp) operating at a 0.45 load factor for 8 hours per day Phase: Architectural Coating 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Architectural Coating Description Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Residential Interior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 50 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 6/30/2008 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Residential Exterior Coatings begins 7/1/2008 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 100 Rule: Nonresidential Interior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Rule: Nonresidential Exterior Coatings begins 1/1/2005 ends 12/31/2040 specifies a VOC of 250 Construction Mitigated Detail Report: CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Dust PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CO2 Time Slice 6/1/2010-12/31/2010 Active 221.73 947.70 2,732.23 3.96 146.17 43.47 189.64 33.01 39.37 72.38 407,868.85 Asphalt 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 3.39 19.71 11.88 0.00 0.01 1.70 1.71 0.00 1.57 1.57 1,640.09 Paving Off-Gas 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving Off Road Diesel 3.20 19.17 10.47 0.00 0.00 1.68 1.68 0.00 1.55 1.55 1,418.81 Paving On Road Diesel 0.03 0.47 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 65.72 Paving Worker Trips 0.04 0.07 1.23 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 155.56 Building 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 120.33 749.78 2,623.63 3.95 16.86 33.09 49.95 6.00 29.82 35.82 388,842.56 Building Off Road Diesel 4.08 23.31 14.31 0.00 0.00 1.67 1.67 0.00 1.54 1.54 2,259.28 Building Vendor Trips 49.90 600.85 456.15 1.10 4.02 24.34 28.36 1.36 22.32 23.68 114,414.50 Building Worker Trips 66.35 125.62 2,153.17 2.85 12.85 7.07 19.92 4.64 5.96 10.60 272,168.78 Coating 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 76.96 0.10 1.63 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 206.19 Architectural Coating 76.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Worker Trips 0.05 0.10 1.63 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 206.19 Demolition 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 5.58 46.52 27.46 0.00 0.02 2.23 2.24 0.00 2.05 2.05 4,289.86 Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demo Off Road Diesel 5.54 46.44 26.23 0.00 0.00 2.22 2.22 0.00 2.05 2.05 4,132.45 Demo On Road Diesel 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 Demo Worker Trips 0.04 0.07 1.23 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 155.56 Mass Grading 06/01/2010- 11.30 96.09 49.23 0.00 129.26 4.69 133.95 27.00 4.31 31.31 9,211.98 Mass Grading Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129.24 0.00 129.24 26.99 0.00 26.99 0.00 Mass Grading Off Road Diesel 11.19 95.53 46.62 0.00 0.00 4.66 4.66 0.00 4.29 4.29 8,842.87 Mass Grading On Road Diesel 0.03 0.42 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 58.01 Mass Grading Worker Trips 0.08 0.14 2.46 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 311.11 Trenching 06/01/2010-06/01/2030 4.18 35.49 18.40 0.00 0.01 1.76 1.77 0.00 1.62 1.62 3,678.17 Trenching Off Road Diesel 4.12 35.38 16.43 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.61 1.61 3,429.28 Trenching Worker Trips 0.06 0.11 1.97 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 248.89 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/10/2009 01:31:24 PM Construction Related Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures apply to Phase: Mass Grading 6/1/2010 - 6/1/2030 - Default Mass Site Grading/Excavation Description For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 5% PM25: 5% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Water exposed surfaces 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 55% PM25: 55% For Soil Stablizing Measures, the Equipment loading/unloading mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 69% PM25: 69% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 44% PM25: 44% For Unpaved Roads Measures, the Manage haul road dust 2x daily watering mitigation reduces emissions by: PM10: 55% PM25: 55% ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:48:22 PM ROG 0.73 0.00 0.07 3.65 8.04 12.49 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Annual Emissions Reports (Tons/Year) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\Existing.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-Existing Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 12.49 10.06 9.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 12,111.86 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 12.49 10.06 9.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 12,111.86 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Annual Tons Per Year, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 10.05 8.15 0.00 0.02 0.02 12,108.94 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.38 Landscape 0.01 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.00 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 0.02 0.02 12,111.86 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (tons/year, unmitigated) 10.06 9.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:48:47 PM ROG 4.01 0.37 20.01 44.04 68.43 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Summer Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\Existing.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-Existing Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 68.43 55.11 49.30 0.00 0.12 0.12 66,358.79 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 68.43 55.11 49.30 0.00 0.12 0.12 66,358.79 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Summer Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 55.05 44.66 0.00 0.10 0.10 66,350.36 Hearth - No Summer Emissions Landscape 0.06 4.64 0.00 0.02 0.02 8.43 Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.00 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 0.12 0.12 66,358.79 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 55.11 49.30 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page: 1 9/9/2009 03:48:37 PM ROG 4.01 0.13 20.01 44.04 68.19 Urbemis 2007 Version 9.2.4 Combined Winter Emissions Reports (Pounds/Day) File Name: P:\COA-51.0E\Technical Studies\AIr\URBEMIS\Existing.urb924 Project Name: PTMLUP-Existing Project Location: Orange County On-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: Version : Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov 1 2006 Off-Road Vehicle Emissions Based on: OFFROAD2007 Summary Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 68.19 57.21 45.58 0.01 0.27 0.27 69,103.30 SUM OF AREA SOURCE AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 68.19 57.21 45.58 0.01 0.27 0.27 69,103.30 Area Source Unmitigated Detail Report: AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Winter Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated Source NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Natural Gas 55.05 44.66 0.00 0.10 0.10 66,350.36 Hearth 2.16 0.92 0.01 0.17 0.17 2,752.94 Landscaping - No Winter Emissions Consumer Products Architectural Coatings 0.01 Percentage of residences with wood stoves changed from 10% to 0% Percentage of residences with wood fireplaces changed from 5% to 0% Percentage of residences with natural gas fireplaces changed from 85% to 100% 0.27 0.27 69,103.30 Area Source Changes to Defaults TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 57.21 45.58 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Period of Record General Climate Summary - Temperature Table updated on Aug 27, 2009 For and annual means, thresholds, and sums: Months with 5 or more missing days are not considered Years with 1 or more missing months are not considered Seasons are climatological not calendar seasons Station:(040192) ANAHEIM From Year=1989 To Year=2008 Averages Daily Extremes Extremes Max. Temp. M Tem Max. Min. Mean High Date Low Date Highest Mean Year Lowest Mean Year 90 F 32 F 32 F F F F F dd/yyyy or F dd/yyyy or F - F - # Days # Days # Days January 69.6 47.4 58.5 95 31/2003 30 30/2002 64.8 2003 55.4 2001 0.2 0.0 0.1 February 70.1 48.3 59.2 94 12/2006 30 15/1990 63.2 1995 55.3 2001 0.7 0.0 0.1 March 72.3 50.5 61.4 97 19/1997 37 18/2002 66.9 2004 55.8 1999 0.9 0.0 0.0 April 74.4 52.7 63.6 106 26/2004 38 02/1999 67.6 2008 59.1 1999 1.5 0.0 0.0 May 77.0 57.3 67.1 106 03/2004 45 01/1999 71.8 2004 62.6 1995 2.1 0.0 0.0 June 80.2 60.5 70.4 104 27/1990 50 17/1995 76.1 2006 66.6 1999 2.6 0.0 0.0 July 85.2 64.2 74.7 107 22/2006 54 24/1999 82.6 2006 71.3 1991 6.8 0.0 0.0 August 86.9 64.3 75.6 102 12/1994 53 23/2002 78.9 1992 71.4 2002 9.1 0.0 0.0 September 86.1 62.5 74.3 108 30/1999 51 13/1991 77.9 1997 71.1 1999 9.6 0.0 0.0 October 81.3 57.7 69.5 107 10/1991 45 31/1991 74.7 2008 63.2 2002 5.1 0.0 0.0 November 75.3 51.8 63.6 99 02/1997 33 19/1994 68.5 2008 57.9 1994 1.3 0.0 0.0 December 69.9 46.9 58.4 89 10/2004 32 23/1998 61.6 2005 55.0 2002 0.0 0.0 0.1 Annual 77.3 55.3 66.3 108 19990930 30 19900215 67.7 2004 64.2 2002 40.0 0.0 0.2 Winter 69.8 47.5 58.7 95 20030131 30 19900215 61.2 2006 56.7 2001 0.8 0.0 0.2 Spring 74.6 53.5 64.0 106 20040426 37 20020318 68.6 2004 59.4 1999 4.5 0.0 0.0 Summer 84.1 63.0 73.6 107 20060722 50 19950617 78.6 2006 70.7 1999 18.5 0.0 0.0 Fall 80.9 57.4 69.1 108 19990930 33 19941119 73.3 2008 66.2 2000 16.1 0.0 0.0 Winter = Dec., Jan., and Feb. Spring = Mar., Apr., and May Summer = Jun., Jul., and Aug. Fall = Sep., Oct., and Nov. Page 1 of 2 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Period of Record General Climate Summary - Temperature 9/4/2009 ---PAGE BREAK--- Western Regional Climate Center, [EMAIL REDACTED] Page 2 of 2 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Period of Record General Climate Summary - Temperature 9/4/2009 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA (040192) Period of Record Climate Summary Period of Record : 8/ 1/1989 to 12/31/2008 Percent of possible observations for period of record. Max. Temp.: 99.8% Min. Temp.: 99.7% Precipitation: 100% Snowfall: 100% Snow Depth: 100% Check Station Metadata or Metadata graphics for more detail about data completeness. Western Regional Climate Center, [EMAIL REDACTED] Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Average Max. Temperature 69.6 70.1 72.3 74.4 77.0 80.2 85.2 86.9 86.1 81.3 75.3 69.9 77.3 Average Min. Temperature 47.4 48.3 50.5 52.7 57.3 60.5 64.2 64.3 62.5 57.7 51.8 46.9 55.3 Average Total Precipitation (in.) 2.85 3.66 1.89 0.81 0.38 0.16 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.64 0.82 1.58 12.92 Average Total SnowFall (in.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Average Snow Depth (in.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Period of Record Climate Summary 9/4/2009 http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliRECtM.pl?ca0192